came For if Baasha began to reign in the third year of Asa and reigned but four and twenty years as 1 King 15. 33. asserteth then was Baasha dead nine full years before the six and thirtieth year of Asa came and therefore he could not then possibly come up against Judah for he was rotten in his grave But it is thus to be understood that in the six and thirtieth year of Asaes Kingdom that is of the Kingdom of Judah since the revolt of the ten tribes Baasha came up against that Kingdom and warred against it the Kingdom that God would not have to be fought against Now as Jeroboam had made the division which had now continued six and thirty years viz. 17 of Rehoboam 3 of Abijah and 16 of Asa so doth Baasha go about now to confirm that division for he setteth on to build and Garrison Ramah that he might stop all entercourse betwixt Israel and Judah and therefore the Holy Ghost reckoneth the time of this act of Baasha by a computation from the first division And he calls it the Kingdom of Asa the rather also because he had lately confirmed and established it to himself as far as it was possible for him to do namely by a Reformation and a Covenant But now doth Asa exceeding ill for he relieth upon an arm of flesh the King of Syria he hireth him with dedicate things which himself had dedicated but a year or two before he bringeth a forraign enemy in to the Land of Israel and imprisoned the Prophet that reproved him for it Here is the first Captivity of any Israelites and Dan the place of the golden Calf falleth under the sword Because Asa leaned upon the King of Syria therefore was the King of Syria escaped out of his hand 2 Chron. 16. 7. for the Syrian was in league with Baasha and had Asa let him alone he had sided with Baasha and Asa if he had relied on God had conquered Israel and the Syrian both but now he had lost that victory over Syria by seeking thereunto for help 2 CHRON. XVI ver 1. to ver 7. World 3065 Asa. 16 Baasha 14 Division 35 BENHADAD son of Tabrimmon Asa. 17 Baasha 15 Division 36 now King of Syria Baasha cometh up against Judah and beginneth to build and to fortifie Ramah which was a frontier upon the very skirt of Ephraim towards Benjamin and Judah 2 CHRON. XVI vers 7. to vers 11. Asa 18 Baasha 16 Division 37 ASA upon this reliance upon Asa 19 Baasha 17 Division 38 Syria declineth excee-dingly Asa 20 Baasha 18 Division 39 from his former goodness Asa 21 Baasha 19 Division 40 for he grows not only harsh to Asa 22 Baasha 20 Division 41 the Prophet Hanani that reproved Asa 23 Baasha 21 Division 42 him but he also began to Asa 24 Baasha 22 Division 43 use harshness and to tyrannize Asa 25 Baasha 23 Division 44 over his Subjects and for this his alteration he is in continual Baasha 24 wars and troubles World 3074 Asa 26 Elah 1 Division 45 Asa seeth an end of his great Enemy World 3075 Asa 27 Elah 2 Omri 1 Division 46 Baasha and the ruine of that family as he had seen the ruine of the family of Jeroboam 1 KINGS XVI vers 1. to vers 23. Asa 18 Baasha 16 Division 37 AS Hanani the Seer reproved Asa 19 Baasha 17 Division 38 Asa for his reliance Asa 20 Baasha 18 Division 39 upon Syria so Jehu the son of Asa 21 Baasha 19 Division 40 Hanani reproveth Baasha for his Asa 22 Baasha 20 Division 41 Idolatry and threatneth destruction Asa 23 Baasha 21 Division 42 to him and to his family Asa 24 Baasha 22 Division 43 and the same fate is denounced Asa 25 Baasha 23 Division 44 to his house that had befallen the Baasha 24 house of Jeroboam World 3074 Asa 26 Elah 1 Division 45 ELAH reigneth in the of Asa 1 King 16. 8. World 3075 Asa 27 Elah 2 Omri 1 Division 46 OMRI reigneth having slaign Zimri who had slain Elah This is a year of great turbulency in the State of Israel Elah a drunkard of Ephraim is slain by Zimri and Baasha's house is utterly destroyed with him Zimri reigneth at Tirzah but Omri is made King in the Camp at Gibbethon In that very place had Baasha gotten the Kingdom by the slaughter of Nadah five and twenty years ago 1 King 15. 27. a siege being there then as it is now Omri besiegeth Zimri in Tirzah and Zimri destroyeth himself and the Kings Pallace together Then there is another competition and war betwixt Omri and Tibni which continueth till the thirty first year of Asa 1 King 16. 23. And then Tibni is overthrown and Omri becometh sole and intire King Howbeit in the account that the Scripture giveth of Omri's raign saying That he raigned twelve years The beginning of these years is to be taken from the death of Zimri which was in the seven and twentieth of Asa 1 King 16. 15. Therefore whereas it is said in vers 23. That in the one and thirtieth year of Asa King of Judah began Omri to raign over Israel twelve years it is to be understood that his whole raign from the death of Zimri was twelve years which expired in the eight and thirtieth of Asa ver 29. but that the first year of his sole and single Government was Asa's thirty first 2 CHRON. XVI ver 11 12 13 14. World 3076 Asa 28 Omri 2 Division 47 ASA seeth now a third change Asa 29 Omri 3 Division 48 in the Kingdom of Israel Asa 30 Omri 4 Division 49 first the family of Jeroboam then Asa 31 Omri 5 Division 50 of Baasha now of Omri Thus Asa 32 Omri 6 Division 51 speedily doth Idolatry root Families Asa 33 Omri 7 Division 52 out and thus little stability Asa 34 Omri 8 Division 53 is there with those that forsake Asa 35 Omri 9 Division 54 God Athaliah a spawn of Asa 36 Omri 10 Division 55 this last family setteth hard in Asa 37 Omri 11 Division 56 time to bring in the like ruine and confusion into the royal stock Omri 12 of Judah that is now in Israel when she goeth about to destroy the Kings Seed Ahab 1 ASA falleth diseased of Ahab 2 the Gout and seeketh too much to Asa 38 the Physitians 2 Chron. 16. 12. World 3086 Asa 39 Division 57 His name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth a Physitian World 3087 Ahab 3 Division 58 in the Chaldee Tongue Asa 40 Division 59 Asa still diseased in his feet 1 KING XXII Vers. 41 42 43. World 3089 Asa 41 Ahab 1 Ahab 4 Division 60 JEHOSHAPHAT reigneth upon his fathers death in the fourth year of Ahab 2 Ahab 5 Division 61 Ahab 2 King 22. 41 42 c. and walketh uprightly before the Lord and prospereth 1 KINGS XVI vers 23. to the end World 3076 Asa 28 Omri 2 Division 47 FROM this second of Omri Asa 29 Omri 3 Division 48 42 years are reckoned to
reign in the twelfth year of Joram the son of Ahab 2 King 8. 25. and in the eleventh year of Joram the son of Ahab 2 Kings 9. 29. Answer The resolution of this doubt will be easie to him that hath such a Chronical Table as we have spoken of before his eyes For there will he see that Jehoram reigned one year before his Father Ahabs death For in the twentieth year of Ahab which was the seventeenth of Jehoshaphat did Ahaziah the son of Ahab begin to reign 1 King 22. 51. being made Viceroy when his Father went to Ramoth Gilead He reigning but that year Jehoram his son was Viceroy or began to rule in his stead the next year namely in Ahabs one and twentieth Ahab in his two and twentieth died and so Jehoram became absolute and intire King and reigned so eleven years so that his reign hath a double reckoning he reigned as Viceroy twelve years but as intire King but eleven 7. Amaziah began to reign in the second year of Joash King of Israel 2 King 14. 1. this was the eight and thirtieth year of his father Joash King of Judah three years current before his death And the reason was because his father had cast himself into so much misery and mischief through his Apostasie and murder of Zacharias 2 King 12. 17 18. 2 Chron. 24. 23 24 25. that he was become unfit and unable to manage the Kingdom 8. Uzziah or Azariah the son of this Amaziah being but sixteen years of age in the seven and twentieth year of the reign of Jeroboam the second 2 King 15. 1 2. it appeareth that he was but four years old at his fathers death Therefore was the Throne empty for eleven years and the rule managed by some as Protectors in the Kings minority 9. There is also an interregnum or vacancy of twenty two years in the Kingdom of Israel between Jeroboam the second and Zachariah whereof what the reason should be is not easie to determine whether through wars from abroad which Jeroboam might have provoked against his house by the conquest of Hamath and Damascus 2 King 14. 28. or through war at home as appeareth by the end of Zachariah 2 King 15. 10. or through what else it was it is uncertain but most sure it was that the Throne was so long without a King since Jeroboam beginning to reign in the fifteenth year of Amaziah and reigning forty one years 1 King 14. 23. died in the fifteenth of Uzziah and Zechariah began not to Reign till the eight and thirtieth 2 Kings 15. 8. 10. Hoshea is said to slay Pekah in the twentieth year of Jotham the Son of Uzziah 2 King 15. 30. whereas Jotham reigned but sixteen years in all 2 King 15. 33. But the reason of this accounting is because of the wickedness of Ahaz in whose reign this occurrence was and the Holy Ghost chuseth rather to reckon by holy Jotham in the dust then by wicked Ahaz alive For in the slaughter of Pekah the Lord avenged upon Pekah the blood-shed and misery he had caused in Judah for he had slain of the men thereof 120000 in one day 2 Chron. 28. 6. Now Ahaz had caused this wrath upon the people in withdrawing them from the ways of the Lord therefore when the Lord avengeth this injury of his people upon Pekah the time of it is computed from Jotham who was holy and upright and not from Ahaz who had caused the mischief 11. There is a scruple of no small difficulty about the reckoning of this twentieth year of Jotham if it once be spied out And that is this If Pekah began to reign in the two and fiftieth or last year of Uzziah and reigned twenty years as 2 King 15. 27. and if Jotham began to reign in the second year of Pekah 2 King 15. 33. then certainly the twentieth year of Pekah the year when Hoshea slew him was but the nineteenth year of Jotham and not the twentieth Answer In this very difficulty hath the Text fixed the time of Uzziahs becoming Leprous which else-where is not determined and it sheweth that it was in the last year of his reign when he assayed to offer incense in the Temple and was struck with the Leprosie a disease with which the Priests who were to be the Judges of it could not be touched nor infected and his son Jotham was over the house judging the land 2 King 15. 5. till the day of his death Now that last year of Uzziah is counted for the first of Jotham in this reckoning that we have in hand and although he began to reign as absolute and sole King in the second year of the Reign of Pekah yet began he to reign as Viceroy in the diseasedness of his father the year before 12. It is said Hoshea the son of Elab began to reign in the twelfth year of Ahaz 2 King 17. 1. whereas he had slain Pekah in the fourth of Ahaz or the twentieth of Jotham which sheweth that he obtained not the Crown immediately upon Pekahs death but was seven or eight years before he could settle it quietly upon his head It is like that Ahaz in this time did disquiet Israel when his potent enemy Pekah was dead in revenge of that slaughter that he had made in Judah and that he kept Hoshea out of the Throne and for this is called the King of Israel 2 Chron. 28. 19. as well as for walking in the ways of those Kings 13. It is said that Hezekiah began to reign in the third year of Hoshea the son of Elab 2 King 18. 1. Now Hoshea beginning in the twelfth of Ahaz 2 King 17. 1. it is apparent that Hezekiah began in the fourteenth and so reigned two or three years with his father Ahaz who reigned sixteen years 2 King 16. 2. The reason of this was because of the wickedness of Ahaz and because of the miseries and intanglements that his wickedness had brought him into as a Chron. 28. 16 17 18 and Chap. 29. 7 8 9. And this sheweth the zeal of Hezekiah in the work of Reformation the more in that he assayed and perfected it so much in the very time of his wicked Father 14. But yet there ariseth another doubt in the computation of the times of Hezekiah parallel with the times of Hoshea For whereas he began to reign in the third year of Hoshea as is clear before then the seventh year of Hoshea should be counted his fifth year and yet it is called but his fourth 2 King 18 9. Answer The beginning of Hezekiahs reign is of a double date He began indeed to be Viceroy and to bear the rule in the third of Hoshea which was the 14th year of his father Ahaz but the time of that year was but short that he was in the royalty and he did but little or nothing of note that year but the next year which was the fifteenth of Ahaz and the fourth of Hoshea on the very first day of
For so was he indeed distinguished from all mortals and Sons of men And God saith he had then begotten him when he had given a token that he was not a meer man by his divine power whereby he had raised him from the dead And according to the tenor of the whole Psalm God is said to have begotten him then when he was ordained King in Sion and all Nations subdued under him Upon which words that passage of our Saviour uttered immediately after he had arisen from the dead is a good Commentary All power is given unto me c. Matth. XXVIII What do those words mean Matth. XXVI 29. I will not henceforth drink of this fruit of the Vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Fathers Kingdom They seem to look this way viz. I will drink no more of it before my Resurrection For in truth his Resurrection was the beginning of his Kingdom when he had overcome those enemies of his Satan Hell and Death from that time was he begotten and established King in Zion I am mistaken if that of Psal. CX v. 3. doth not in some measure fall in here also which give me leave to render by way of paraphrase into such a sense as this Thy people shall be a willing people in the day of thy power it shall be a willing people in the beauties of holiness it shall be a willing people from the Womb of the morning thine is the dew of thy youth Now the dew of Christ is that quickning power of his by which he can bring the dead to life again Isai. XXVI 19. And the dew of thy youth O Christ is thine That is it is thine own power and vertue that raiseth thee again I would therefore apply those words from the womb of the morning to his Resurrection because the Resurrection of Jesus was the dawn of the new world the morning of the new Creation VERS XXXIV 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The sure mercies of David IT hath been generally observed that this phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken from the Greek Version in Isai. LV. 3. But it is not so generally remarked that by David was understood the Messiah which yet the Rabbins themselves Kimchi and Ab. Ezra have well observed the following Verse expressly confirming it The Resurrection of our Saviour therefore by the interpretation of the Apostle is said to be the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The sure mercies of Christ. And God by his Prophet from whence this clause is taken doth promise the raising again of the Messiah and all the benefits of that Resurrection He had fortold and promised his death Chap. LIII But what mercies could have been hoped for by a dead Messiah had he been always to have continued dead They had been weak and instable kindnesses had they terminated in death He promises mercies therefore firm and stable that were never to have end because they should be always flowing and issuing out of his resurrection Whereas these things are quoted out of the Prophet in the words of the LXX varying a little from the Prophets words and those much more 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold ye despisers and wonder c. vers 41. it might be enquired in what language the Apostle preached as also in what language Moses and the Prophets were read in that Synagogue vers 15. If we say in the Greek it is a question whether the Pisidians could understand it If we say in the Pisidian language it is hardly to be believed the Bible was then rendred into that language It is remarkable what was quoted above out of Strabo where he mentions four tongues amongst them the Greek and the Pisidian distinct from one another But this I have already discusst in the Notes upon Verse 15. of this Chapter VERS XLI 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Behold ye despisers c. DR Pocock a a a a a a Poc. Miscell 3. here as always very learnedly and accurately examines what the Greek Interpreters Hab. I. read saving in the mean time the reading which the Hebrew Bibles exhibit for it is one thing how the Greek read it and another thing how it should be truly read VERS XLII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Gentiles besought c. IT is all one as to the force of the words as far as I see whether you render them they besought the Gentiles or the Gentiles besought them the later Version hath chiefly obtained but what absurdity is it if we should admit the former And doth not the very order of the words seem to favour it If it had been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one might have inclined to the later without controversie but being it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is place for doubting And if it were so that the Jews resented the Apostles doctrine so ill that they went out of the Synagogue disturbed and offended as some conjecture and that not improbably we may the easilier imagine that the Apostles besought the Gentiles that tarried behind that they would patiently hear these things again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 On the next Sabbath I. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Lexicons tell us amongst other things denotes hence forward or hereafter Now this must be noted that this discourse was held in the fore noon for it was that time of the day only that they assembled in the Synagogue in the afternoon they met in Beth Midras Let us consider therefore whether this phrase will not bear this sense They besought that afterwards upon that Sabbath viz. in the afternoon they would hear again such a Sermon And then whether the Gentiles besought the Apostles or the Apostles the Gentiles it dot not alter the case II. Let us inquire whether the Apostles and the Christian Church did not now observe and celebrate the Lord's day It can hardly be denyed and if so then judge whether the Apostles might not invite the Gentiles that they would assemble again the next day that is upon the Christian Sabbath and hear these things again If we yield that the Lord's day is to be called the Sabbath then we shall easily yield that it might be rightly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbath after And indeed when the speech was amongst the Jews or Judaizing Proselytes it is no wonder if it were called the Sabbath As if the Apostles had said to morrow we celebrate our Sabbath and will you on that day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have these words preached to you III. Or let 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be the week betwixt the two Sabbaths as that expression must be rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I fast twice in the week then as the sense is easie that they besought them the same things might be repeated on the following week so the respect might have more particularly been had to the second and fifth day in the week when they usually meet together in the Synagogue
Ismael 22 Isaac 8 league c. God had foretold Abraham of the Egyptian Abram 109 Ismael 23 Isaac 9 affliction and his affliction beginneth first by an Egyptian Abram 110 Ismael 24 Isaac 10 namely by Hagar and her son There is mention of Abram 111 Ismael 25 Isaac 11 a double space of his seeds sojourning in a land not Abram 112 Ismael 26 Isaac 12 theirs viz. 400 years Chap. 15. 13. which was from Abram 113 Ismael 27 Isaac 13 Ismaels mocking to their delivery out of Egypt and Abram 114 Ismael 28 Isaac 14 430 years Exod. 12. 40. which was from the promise Abram 115 Ismael 29 Isaac 15 given to Abram Gen. 17. 1. to their delivery Gal. 3. 17. Abram 116 Ismael 30 Isaac 16 Abraham consecrateth a grove at Beersheba that he Abram 117 Ismael 31 Isaac 17 might have hallowed wood for his sacrifices as well as holy fire see Chap. 21. 7. he had had fire from heaven at some time upon his sacrifice and he preserved it World 2126 Sem 568 Salah 433 Eber 403 Abram 118 Ismael 32 Isaac 18 SALAH or Shelah dieth being 433 years old read Gen. 11. 14 15. Abram 119 Ismael 33 Isaac 19 There is a good space of time passed over in silence Abram 120 Ismael 34 Isaac 20 concerning Isaac for from the time of Ismaels mocking Abram 121 Ismael 35 Isaac 21 which was at his fifth year till the time of his offering Abram 122 Ismael 36 Isaac 22 up in a figure which was at his thirty third as Abram 123 Ismael 37 Isaac 23 may be conceived there is no mention of him for as Abram 124 Ismael 38 Isaac 24 yet the story most especially followeth the Acts of Abraham Abram 125 Ismael 39 Isaac 25 Now it is very likely that as the offering up of Abram 126 Ismael 40 Isaac 26 Isaac was so plain and perfect a figure of the offering up Abram 127 Ismael 41 Isaac 27 of Christ in other things so also that these two things the Type and Antitype did agree in the time and that Isaac was offered when he was two and thirty years and an half old or three and thirty current which was the age Abraham 128 Ismael 42 Isaac 28 of our Saviour when he was crucified And the like concurrence Abraham 129 Ismael 43 Isaac 29 and circumstance of the time may be also well Abraham 130 Ismael 44 Isaac 30 conceived of Abel at his death who murdred by his brother Abraham 131 Ismael 45 Isaac 31 typified the same thing that Isaac did sacrificed by Abraham 132 Ismael 46 Isaac 32 his father CHAP. XXII Abraham 133 Ismael 47 Isaac 33 ISAAC probably offered up this year The mount Moriah Abraham 134 Ismael 48 Isaac 34 Ver. 2. the third day Ver. 4. His first bearing the Abraham 135 Ismael 49 Isaac 35 wood and then the wood bearing him Vers. 6 9. His Abraham 136 Ismael 50 Isaac 36 being bound hand and foot Vers. 9. do call us to remember such circumstances in the death of Christ. CHAP. XXIII World 2145 Sem 587 Eber 422 Abraham 137 Ismael 51 Isaac 37 SARAH dieth being 127 years old the only woman Abraham 138 Ismael 52 Isaac 38 whose age is recorded in Scripture A burial place is Abraham 139 Ismael 53 Isaac 39 the first land that Abraham hath in Canaan CHAP. XXIV XXV to Verse 7. and 1 CHRON. 1. Vers. 32 33. World 2148 Sem 590 Eber 425 Abraham 140 Ismael 54 Isaac 40 ISAAC is married to Rebeccah Abraham after Sarahs Abraham 141 Ismael 55 Isaac 41 death marrieth Keturah and hath divers children by Abraham 142 Ismael 56 Isaac 42 her those children when they come to age he sendeth Abraham 143 Ismael 57 Isaac 43 away into those countries beyond Jordan and in Arabia Abraham 144 Ismael 58 Isaac 44 which Kedarlaomer and the Kings with him had conquered Abraham 145 Ismael 59 Isaac 45 and by the conquest of them they descended to Abraham Abraham 146 Ismael 60 Isaac 46 There these sons of his grow into Nations and become continual Abraham 147 Ismael 61 Isaac 47 enemies to the seed of Israel Though Abraham were Abraham 148 Ismael 62 Isaac 48 very old at Sarahs death being 137 years old then yet is Abraham 149 Ismael 63 Isaac 49 he not past the strength of generation through the strength of that promise I will multiply thee c. The greatest wonder of Isaacs birth was that he was born of an old barren woman World 2158 Sem 600 Eber 435 Abraham 150 Ismael 64 Isaac 50 SEM dieth being 600 years old read Gen. 11. 11. the Abraham 151 Ismael 65 Isaac 51 same was Melchisedech the only man in the world greater Abraham 152 Ismael 66 Isaac 52 then Abraham For though Eber and Arphaxad and the Abraham 153 Ismael 67 Isaac 53 other Patriarchs had this dignity above Abraham that they Abraham 154 Ismael 68 Isaac 54 were his fathers yet he was dignified above them all in Abraham 155 Ismael 69 Isaac 55 this that he had the singular and glorious Promise made to Abraham 156 Ismael 70 Isaac 56 him which was not made to any of them but only Sem Abraham 157 Ismael 71 Isaac 57 Sem saw the two great miseries of the world the Flood Abraham 158 Ismael 72 Isaac 58 and the confusion of Tongues but he saw comfort in Abraham Abraham 159 Ismael 73 Isaac 59 and Isaac He lived as many years after Abraham came into the land of Canaan as Abraham was old when he came thither namely 75 years CHAP. XXV Ver. 11. and from Ver. 19. to the end World 2168 Eber 445 Abraham 160 Ismael 74 Isaac 60 JACOB and Esau born first he that was natural Abraham 161 Ismael 75 Isaac 61 Iacob 1 and then he that was spiritual These children Abraham 162 Ismael 75 Isaac 61 Iacob 2 strove in the womb and Rebeccah inquired after the Abraham 163 Ismael 77 Isaac 63 Iacob 3 cause and the Lord by an oracle it is like by Abrahams Abraham 164 Ismael 78 Isaac 64 Iacob 4 oracle at Beersheba resolves her of the difference of the Abraham 165 Ismael 79 Isaac 65 Iacob 5 children and of the Nations that should descend of Abraham 166 Ismael 80 Isaac 66 Iacob 6 them Esau is born all hairy over like a kid a strange Abraham 167 Ismael 81 Isaac 67 Iacob 7 birth and he is therefore named Esau that is Made Abraham 168 Ismael 82 Isaac 68 Iacob 8 for he had his beard and his pubes now even from the Abraham 169 Ismael 83 Isaac 69 Iacob 9 birth as if he had been a mature man The story is Abraham 170 Ismael 84 Isaac 70 Iacob 10 now to fall upon the acts of Isaac and Jacob and therefore in this Chapter it concludes the story of Abraham and Ismael reckoneth up the tearm of their lives and mentioneth their deaths by anticipation the Reader Abrah 171 Ismael 85 Isaac 71 Iacob 11 will readily reduce the Texts that mention these to Abrah
grandchilds actions were like Manasses his actions the King of Judah CHAP. XIX Othniel 27 ISrael tolerateth this Idolatry and never stirreth either against Micah or the Danites which toleration breedeth all iniquity so that Gibeah a City of Israel becometh as abominable as Sodom A whorish woman is kill'd with whoredom CHAP. XX. ALL Israel goeth against Gibeah and that by Gods express commission and command and yet 40000 of them are slain by that wicked and wretched Town and by the Tribe that took part with it Thus did God avenge his own cause against Israel because Israel would not avenge Gods cause against Idolatry they were so sensible of an injury done to a whore in Gibeah but were not at all sensible of an injury done to God by Dan's Idolatry when God hath thus used Benjamin to execute his justice against Israel for not punishing Idolatry he then useth Israel to punish Benjamin for not delivering Gibeah up to justice Othniel it is like was chief commander in this service and Phineas was zealous in this case as he had been in one of a not much different nature Numb 25. Benjamin is now Benoni a son of sorrow and Rachel hath cause to weep for her children CHAP. XXI HAdad Rimmon Zech. 12. 11. or the sad shout of Rimmon the Prophet alludeth to the two great and general Lamentations of Israel the one about the rock Rimmon where a whole Tribe was now come to 400 men and whereupon even the very conquerors become mourners The other in the valley of Megiddo for the death of Josiah The one in the beginning of their estate the other in the latter end Jabesh Gilead is destroyed for affection to Benjamin they were both of Joseph and both had pitched under one standard Benjamin raveneth like a wolf for wives Josephs daughters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 49. 22. go to the enemy and repair the decaied Tribe when the daughters of Shiloh in Ephraim and of Jabesh in Manasseh supply Benjamin an hostile Tribe with wives or else it had perished and thus is the story of these Chapters knit to it self Now that the beginning of the Book of Judges is the proper time and place of these stories may be concluded upon these reasons 1. The Danites were unsetled when the stories of the seventeenth and eighteenth Chapters came to pass and therefore this could not be long after Joshua's death 2. Phinehas was alive at the battle at Gibeah Chap. 20. 28. 3. The wickedness of Gibeah is reckoned for their first villany Hos. 10 9. 4. Deborah speaketh of the 40000 of Israel that perished by Benjamin as if neither sword nor spear had been among them Chap. 5. 8. 5. Mahaneh Dan which was so named upon the march of the Danites when they set up their Idolatry Chap. 18. 12. is mentioned in the story of Samson though that story be set before the story of their march Chap. 15. 25. 6. Dan is omitted among the sealed of the Lord Rev. 7. because idolatry first began in his Tribe as is said before 7. Ehud may very well be supposed to have been one of the left-handed Benjamites and one of them that escaped at the rock Rimmon Chap. 20. 16. 21. Now the reason why the Holy Ghost hath laid these stories which came to pass so soon in so late a place may be supposed to be this 1. That the Reader observing how their state-policy failed in the death of Samson which was a Danite might presently be shewed Gods justice in it because their Religion had first failed among the Danites 2. That when he observes that eleven hundred pieces of silver were given by every Philistim Prince for the ruin of Samson Chap. 16. 5. he might presently observe the eleven hundred pieces of silver that were given by Micahs mother for the making of an Idol which ruined Religion in Samsons Tribe 3. That the story of Micah of the hill Country of Ephraim the first destroyer of Religion and the story of Saemuel of the hill Country of Ephraim the first reformer of Religion might be laid together somewhat near CHAP. II. Ver. 11. to the end And CHAP. III. to Ver. 11. Othniel 28 WHEN these stories are read the story returns to Chap. 2. 11. and relateth Othniel 29 the spreading of Idolatry over all the Tribes as it had done over Othniel 30 that of Dan and how mixt marriages with cursed Canaanites undo Israel their Othniel 31 first afflicter is Cushan Rishathaim a Mesopotamian he oppressed them eight Othniel 32 years it is like he broke in upon the Tribes that lay on the other side Jordan Othniel 33 as those that lay nearest to his own Country and there got possession for so Othniel 34 many years together and incroached upon them within Jordan by degrees as Othniel 35 he found strength and opportunity but Othniel of Judah maketh good the Othniel 36 Prophecy of Judahs being a Lions whelp c. and so the tents of Cushan come into Othniel 37 affliction c. Hab. 3. 7. The consideration and observing that the first forain Othniel 38 oppressor of all others that troubled Israel in their own land was a man of Othniel 39 Aram Naharaim or a Mesopotamian it cannot but call to mind the dealing of Laban with Jacob in that place and it is a matter of question and some strangeness how and why a man of that Country of all others should thus oppress theirs CHAP. III. Vers. 11. World 2610 Othniel 40 OThniel dieth CHAP. III. Verse 12. to the end World 2611 Ehud 1 Ehud 2 Ehud 3 EHuds eighty years begin not that he ruled so long without intermission Ehud 4 Ehud 5 or so long in any sense at all for eighty years was even a mans Ehud 6 Ehud 7 whole life but that there were fourscore years from the death of Othniel Ehud 8 and that after Ehud delivered them from Eglon he was Judge and a Ruler Ehud 9 Ehud 10 over them whilest he lived not as a Monarch for the Sanhedrin bare the Ehud 11 sway but as a chief commander and one ready to undertake for them if Ehud 12 Ehud 13 any enemies should arise and one ready to teach and lead them in the ways Ehud 14 of God as was said before of Othniel It is said of Othniels time that the Ehud 15 Ehud 16 land had rest Ehud 17 forty years and Othniel died by which it is apparent that the forty years are reckoned till Othniels death so in Chap. 22. Ibsan judged Ehud 18 Ehud 19 seven years and died Elon judged ten years and died Abdon judged eight Ehud 20 years and died c. Samson judged twenty years and these twenty years Ehud 21 ended in his death and so are we to conceive of these fourscore of Ehud Ehud 22 Ehud 23 that they ended with his death also and therefore it is improper to conceive Ehud 24 that the eight years of Cushans afflicting were the last eight years of Ehud 25 Ehud 26 Othniels
forty or the eighteen years of Eglons afflicting were the last eighteen Ehud 27 years of Ehuds eighty for by this means Othniel and Ehud are made Ehud 28 to start up in the very end of these sums of years and get a victory and no Ehud 29 Ehud 30 more news of them whereas it is apparent not only by the years of the Ehud 31 men lately cited and by Chap. 2. 19. but also by other passages that the Ehud 32 Ehud 33 Judge was not only their deliverer in one fought battle or the like but Ehud 34 that he was their instructer and helped and strove to keep them to the fear Ehud 35 Ehud 36 of the Lord Chap. 2. 17. and when any of the Judges did not so they are Ehud 37 noted for it as Gideon about his Ephod Abimeleck about his brethren Ehud 38 Ehud 39 and Samson about his women so that in what time of these fourscore years Ehud 40 of Ehud to place the eighteen of Eglons afflicting it is not certain nor is it Ehud 41 very much material seeing it is certain that they fell out sometime within Ehud 42 Ehud 43 those fourscore years A good space of time may we allot for Israels falling Ehud 44 to Idolatry after Othniels death and for Gods giving them up to their enemies Ehud 45 Ehud 46 power upon their Idolatry but whensoever that affliction comes it Ehud 47 comes so home that a King of Moab is King of Israel and hath his very Ehud 48 Ehud 49 Court and Palace in the Land of Canaan in the City of Jericho That City Ehud 50 was inhabited by Israelites before Eglon and his Moabites Ammonites and Ehud 51 Ehud 52 Amalekites drove them out and yet had not Joshua's curse seized on them Ehud 53 for that had reference only to Rahabs kindred and family to prohibite Ehud 54 Ehud 55 them for ever going about to fortifie and build it for a Canaanitish Town Ehud 56 again and Hiel that went about that work in Ahabs time was of that Ehud 57 Ehud 58 stock and that light upon him accordingly as will be touched there The Ehud 59 oppressours of Israel at this time were the very same Nation that came Ehud 60 against Jehoshaphat 2 Chron. 20. Namely Moabites Ammonites and Meunims Ehud 61 Ehud 62 or Amalekites and Edomites that dwelt promiscuously among Ammon as see Ehud 63 the Notes when we came there and those that are here spoken of are generally Ehud 64 Ehud 65 fat men ver 29. as was Eglon himself extraordinarily Ehud was a Ehud 66 man of Benjamin and probably of Gibeah for he was of the same family in Ehud 67 Benjamin that King Saul was of afterwards and thus the honour of Benjamin Ehud 68 Ehud 69 was somewhat restored in him and as Judah in Othniel hath the first Ehud 70 honour of Judge-ship so Benjamin in Ehud had the second Eglon is destroyed Ehud 71 Ehud 72 with a two edged sword compare Rev. 1. 16. About the latter end Ehud 73 of Ehuds life we may indeed suppose some of the passages of the Book of Ehud 74 Ruth to have come to pass for that Book containeth the story of a very Ehud 75 Ehud 76 long time but the exact place in the Book of Judges where and the exact Ehud 77 time in Chronicle when to lay any particular of those occurrences is not Ehud 78 Ehud 79 to be found nor determined World 2690 Ehud 80 EHUD dieth The Book of RUTH TOwards the aiming and concluding upon the time of the story of the Book of Ruth these things may not unprofitably be taken into consideration 1. That Salmon who came with Joshua into the land married Rahab and of her begat Boaz who married Ruth Matth. 1. 5. 2. That from Salmons coming into the land to the birth of David were 366 years namely 17 of Joshua 299 of Judges 40 of Eli and 10 of Samuel and yet was this long space of time taken up by four men viz. Salmon before he begat Boaz of Rahab and Boaz before he begat Obed of Ruth and Obed before he begat Jesse and Jesse before he begat David so that you must allow to every one of them near upon a hundred years before he begat his son 3. That from their coming into Canaan to Ehuds death were 137 years 4. Now grant that Rahab lived sixty years in Israel before she had Boaz by Salmon and that Boaz lived an hundred years before he was married to Ruth both which are fair allowances yet will this his marriage with Ruth fall but three years after Ehuds death So that this Book of Ruth may be taken in between the third and fourth Chapters of the Book of Judges The Book of Ruth setteth out the great providence of God in bringing light out of darkness Ruth a mother of Christ out of the incest of Lot a special mark over 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the story of Lots eldest daughter lying with her father Gen. 19. 34. and a special mark in a great letter in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the story of Ruth going to Boaz his bed Ruth 4. 13. seem to relate one to the other and both together to point at this providence Boaz born of a Heathen woman and married to a Heathen woman but both these become Israelites and holy After the reading of the Book of Ruth the Reader and story return to the fourth of Judges JUDGES CHAP. IV. V. World 2691 Deborah 1 Deborah 2 DEBORAH and BARAKS forty years begin Israel after the death Deborah 3 of Ehud fall to their old Idolatry again and for that ere long fall under Deborah 4 Deborah 5 oppression Shamgar got one wonderful victory for them but wrought Deborah 6 not a perfect deliverance Deborab a woman of Ephraim ariseth after him and Deborah 7 Deborah 8 judgeth the people she being a Prophetess and by the spirit of Prophecy stirreth Deborah 9 up Barak of Nephtali to fight with Sisera whom he overcometh by an army Deborah 10 of Galileans but Sisera himself falleth by the hand of a Proselytess woman Deborah 11 Deborah 12 Then Deborah and Barak sang Here the man of Nephtali giveth goodly Deborah 13 words They tell the sad case of Israel in Shamgars and Jaels times before the Deborah 14 Deborah 15 victory was gotten over Sisera that men durst not go in the common ways nor Deborah 16 dwell in villages and unwalled Towns for fear of the enemy The rich and Deborah 17 Deborah 18 gallant men that used to ride on white Asses durst not ride in those times and Deborah 19 the rulers durst not sit in Judgment for fear of being surprised and people Deborah 20 Deborah 21 durst not go to the Town wells to draw water for fear of the enemies archers Deborah 22 but now all these may speak of the actings of God towards the forsaken villages Deborah 23 Deborah 24 and towards the forlorn places of Judicature in the gates for they
doth confirm the order JOHN from Machaerus Castle where he lay Prisoner sendeth two of his Disciples to Christ to enquire of him Whether he were he that should come Not that John was ignorant who he was having had so many demonstrations of him as he had had and having given so ample testimony of him as he had done Joh. 1. 34 36. 3. 29 30. Nor that Johns Disciples were so wilfully ignorant of him as not to be perswaded by their Master that he was he but his message to him seems to this purpose John and his Disciples had heard of the great and many miracles that Christ had done healing the sick and raising the dead c. and it may be they thought it strange that Christ amongst all his miraculous workings would not work Johns liberty out of thraldom who lay a prisoner for him and for the Gospel he preached before him And this may be was the bottom of their question Art thou he that shall come or look we for another As expecting somewhat more from the Messias then they had yet obtained They received a full answer to their question by the miracles they saw wrought which abundantly proved that he was he that was to come But as to their expectation of his miraculous enlargement of John his answer was that his work was to preach the Gospel and that it was a blessed thing not to take any offence at him but to yield and submit to his wise dispensations And accordingly when the messengers of John were returned he giveth a glorious testimony concerning him to the people but yet sheweth how far one truly and fully acquainted and stated in the Kingdom of Heaven went beyond him in judging of it who looked for temporal redemption by it The Method of Matthew is somewhat difficult here but he seemeth purposely to have joyned the mission of Christs Disciples and Johns Disciples together I suppose Christ was at Jerusalem when Johns messengers came to him and if it were at the feast of Pentecost John had then been seven or eight months in prison SECTION XXXII MATTH Chap. XI from Ver. 20. to the end of the Chapter Chorazin and Bethsaida upbraided BEsides Matthews continuing this portion to that that went before the upbraiding of these Cities is so answerable to the matter contained in the end of the former Section that it easily shews it to be spoken at the same time See Ver. 17 18 19. of this Chapter When Christ saith that if the things done in these Cities had been done in Tyre and Sidon and Sodom and Gomorrha they would have repented and would have remained till now he understandeth not saving grace and saving repentance in them but such an external humiliation as would have preserved them from ruine As the case was with Nineveh they repented and were delivered from the threatned destruction their repentance was not to salvation of the persons but to the preservation of their City as Ahabs humbling prevented the present judgment and not his final condemnation SECTION XXXIII LUKE Chap. VII from Ver. 36. to the end of the Chapter Mary Magdalen weepeth at Christs feet and washeth them with tears c. THE continuation of this portion in Luke to that in Sect. 31. will plead for its order and the reader will easily observe that the interposition of the preceding Section in Matthew is so far from interrupting the story that it is necessarily to be taken in there and is an illustration of it The actings of the two several parties in this Section the Pharisee that invited Christ to eat with him and the woman sinner that comes and weeps at his feet for mercy may seem to have had some rise from or some occasional reference to the speech of Christ in the two Sections next preceding In the former he had said The son of man came eating and drinking and this possibly might induce the Pharisee to his invitation and in the latter he had said Come unto me â—e that are weary and heavy laden and that might invite the woman to her address This woman was Mary the sister of Lazarus who was also called Mary Magdalen of whom there is mention in the very beginning of the next Chapter That she was Mary the sister of Lazarus John giveth us ground to assert John 11. 2. as we shall shew when we come there where we shall evidence that these words It was that Mary which annointed the Lord with oyntment and wiped his feet with her hair can properly be referred to no story but this before us And that Mary the sister of Lazarus was called Mary Magdalen we shall prove in the next Section Christ in the story in Sect. 31. when Johns disciples came to him we supposed to be at Jerusalem and answerably it may be conceived that this passage occurred at Bethany where Simon the Pharisee may not improbably be held to be the same with Simon the Leper Matth. 26. 6. where this very woman again annointed him SECTION XXXIV LUKE Chap. VIII Ver. 1 2 3. Certain women that followed Christ. LUKE again is the warrant for the order In the former story he had spoken of one woman that had found healing and mercy with Christ and he speaks here of divers and among them Mary Magdalen Now that she was Mary the sister of Lazarus let but these two arguments be weighed not to insist upon more The first is this If Mary Magdalen were not Mary the sister of Lararus then Mary the sister of Lazarus gave no attendance at Christs death nor had any thing to do about his buriall or at least is not mentioned as an agent at either which is a thing so incredible to conceive that it needs not much discourse to set forth the incredibility of it There is mention of Mary Magdalen and Mary the mother of James and Salom Mark 15. 40. and Joanna Luk. 24. 10. but not a word of Mary the sister of Lazarus She had twice annointed Christ in the compass of that very week she had ever been as neer and as zealous a woman disciple as any that followed him and her residence was at Bethany hard by Jerusalem and what is now become of her in these two great occasions of attending upon Christs death and imbalming Had she left Christ and neglected her attendance on him at this time above all others or have the Evangelists whilst they mention the other that attended left her out It is so unreasonable to believe either of these that even necessity inforceth us to conclude that when they name Mary Magdalen they mean Mary the sister of Lazarus And Secondly take this Argument of Baronius which hath more weight in it then at first sight it doth seem to have who in his Annals ad Annum Christi 32 goes about to prove this thing that we assert and he shews how it also was the opinion of the Fathers and those in former times His words are these We say upon the
in all Judea and in Samaria c. He had forbidden them before Go not into the way of the Gentiles and into any City of the Samaritans do not enter Matth. 10. 5. but now that partition wall that had been between is to be broken down Of all Nations and people under Heaven the Samaritans were the most odious to the Jews and a main reason was because they were Jews Apostates For though the first peopling of that place after the Captivity of the ten Tribes was by Heathens 2 King 17. yet upon the building of the Temple on mount Gerizim such multitudes of Jews continually flocked thither that generally Samaritanism was but a mongrel Judaism They called Jacob their father expected Messias had their Temple Priesthood Service Pentatuch c. And to spare more take but this one passage in Talm. Jerus Pesachin fol. 27. 2. The Cuthaeans all the time that they celebrate their unleavened bread feast with Israel they are to be believed concerning their putting away of leaven If they do not keep their unleavened bread feast with Israel they are not to be believed concerning their putting away of leaven Rabban Gamaliel saith All the Ordinances that the Cuthaeans use they are more punctual in them then Israel is It is an unhappy obscurity that the Hebrew Writers have put upon the word Cuthaeans for though it most properly signifie Samaritans yet have they so commonly given this name to Christians as the most odious name they could invent to give them that in the most places that you meet with it you cannot tell whether they mean the one or the other In the place cited it seemeth indeed most likely that it means the Samaritans because it speaks of their keeping the feast of unleavened bread and using the Ordinances of Israel unless it speak of those Jews that had received the Gospel and become Christians and were fallen to their Judaism again and joyned that with their Christianity which very many did as we shall have occasion to observe hereafter Simon Magus taketh upon him to believe and is baptized The naming of him calls to mind the mention of one Simon a Magician that Josephus speaks of Antiq. lib. 20. cap. 5. who was a means to intice Drusilla from her former husband to go and marry Felix the Governour of Judea this might very well be that man And it minds of a passage in Tal. Jerus in Jebamoth fol. 13. col 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I cannot but render it The Simonians came to Rabbi and said to him We pray thee give us a man to be our Expositor Judge Minister Scribe Traditionary and to do for us all we need I know what 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in Tal. Bab. in Cholin fol. 15. But certainly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 means some people but whence so named there is no disputing here Philip baptized Samaria and did great wonders among them but could not bestow the Holy Ghost upon them that power belonged only to the Apostles therefore Peter and John are sent thither for that purpose They laid their hands upon them and they received the Holy Ghost Not upon all for what needeth that Or what reason was there for it The gifts of the Holy Ghost that were received were these miraculous ones of Tongues Prophesie c. Acts 10. 46. 19. 6. Now of these there were but these two ends 1. For the confirmation of the doctrine of the Gospel such miraculous gifts attending it And 2. for instruction of others for Tongues were given indeed for a sign 1 Cor. 14. 22. but not only for a sign but for edification and instruction as the Apostle also sheweth at large in the same Chapter Now both these ends were attained though they that received the Holy Ghost were not all but only a few and set number nay the later not conceivable of all for if all were inabled miraculously to be Teachers who were to be taught The Imposition therefore of the Apostles hands mentioned here and elsewhere and those passages These signs shall follow those that believe they shall cast out Devils they shall speak with Tongues c. Mark 16. 17. Repent and be baptized every one of you and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost Act. 2. 38 c. were not upon all that believed the Gospel and were baptized but upon some certain number whom they were directed by the Holy Ghost to lay their hands upon as those men that God had appointed and determined for Preachers and Ministers to the people and who by the Imposition of the Apostles hands receiving the Holy Ghost were by those gifts inabled to understand the language and sense of Scripture and to be instructers of the people and to build them up Candaces Eunuch having been at Jerusalem to worship and returning back is converted by Philip. Of Candace Queen of Meroe in Aethiopia see Strabo lib. 17. He met with him in the way that lead from Jerusalem to Gaza the desert Of this place Strabo again lib. 16. speaketh thus Then is the haven of the Gazaeans above which some seven furlongs is the City once glorious but ruined by Alexander 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and it remaineth desert Diodorus Siculus calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The old Gaza lib. 19. for another was built at the haven by the Sea side called sometimes Maiuma Sozom. Eccles. hist. lib. 5. cap. 3. and afterward Constantia named so by Constantine after the name of his sister as saith Euseb. de Vit. Constant lib. 4. cap. 28. or as Sozomen of his son Constantius Whether this Eunuch were a Jew or a Proselyte is scarce worth inquiring his devotion is far more worth spending thoughts upon which brought him so long a journey and imployed him so well in his travail as in reading the Scripture He is baptized in the name of Jesus ver 37. and as it may well be conceived takes ship at Gaza and is the first that we find that carried the profession of Jesus into Africk The mention of which may justly call our thoughts to consider of the Temple built in Egypt by Onias and the vast numbers of Jews that were in that and the Countries thereabouts and yet how little intimation there is in the New Testament Story by whom or how the Gospel was conveyed into those parts Philip is rapt by the Spirit from Gaza to Azotus which were 270 furlongs or 34 miles asunder as Diodor. Sicul. ubi supra measures ACTS CHAP. IX from the beginning to Vers. 23. THE conversion of Paul A monument of mercy 1 Tim. 1. 14 16. A Pharisee a persecutor a murderer yet become a Christian a Preacher an Apostle He consented to Stevens death and after that he gets a Commission from the chief Priests and makes desperate havock in Jerusalem Act. 8. 2. 22. 4. 26. 10. We find all along this Book that the chief Priests are not only the busiest men in persecuting of the Gospel but in
were so eminent in gifts of the Spirit as well as they of the Circumcision and what could these add to them But James findeth out a temper betwixt those that would have all these yokes imposed and those that would have none that so the Jews might have the less offence and the Gentiles no burden neither And that was that the Gentiles might be required to restrain from eating things offered to Idols and strangled and blood and fornication The three first were now become things indifferent however strictly they had been imposed by the Law before Christ having by his death done down the partition wall and laid these things aside as useless when there was to be no distinction of meats or Nations any more yet because the Jews were so glewed to these things that the tearing of them away suddenly would in a manner have fetched up skin and flesh and all therefore the whole Council upon the motion of James think it fit that the Gentiles should thus far Judaize till time and fuller acquaintance with the Gospel might make both Jews and Gentiles to lay these now needless niceties aside The Jews about these things had these Canons among many others Avodah Zarah per. 2. These things of Idolatry are forbidden and their prohibition meaneth the prohibition of their use Wine and vinegar used in Idolatry which at first was wine c. And flesh that was brought in for Idolatry is permitted to be used viz. before it was offered but what is brought out is prohibited And bottles and cans used in Idolatry and an Israelites wine put in them are prohibited to be used Maymon in Avoda Zarah per. 7. A beast offered to an Idol is forbidden for any use yea even his dung bones horns hoofs skin yea though there were only a hole cut in the beast to take out the heart and that alone offered Divers other things used in Idolatry are mentioned and prohibited The observing of all which helpeth to clear the distinction of the words used in the Text namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for these properly were not one and the same thing for every 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 buâ—… contra every 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For divers things were used at an Idolatrous offering which themselves were not offered as knives dishes and the like which cannot be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and yet by these traditions were prophane and unclean and prohibited to be used About not eating of blood they expounded the prohibition of the Law in that point unto this purpose He that eats blood to the quantity of an olive if presumptuously he is to be cut off and if ignorantly he is to bring a sin offering Talm. in Cherithuth per. 1. 5. Maym. in Maacaloth Asuroth per. 6. By things strangled their Canons understood any thing that died of it self or that was not killed as it ought to be And he that eat to the quantity of an olive of the flesh of any cattel that died of it self or of any beast or any fowl that died of it self was to be whipt as it is said Ye shall eat no carcase and whatsoever was not slain as was sitting is reputed as if dying of it self Talm. in Zevachin per. 7. Maym. ubi super per. 1. Therefore they had their rules about killing any beast that they were to eat of which the Talmudick Treatise Cholin discusseth at large Now as concerning fornication it is controverted first whether it mean bodily or spiritual and secondly how it cometh to be ranked among things indifferent as the other named were it self being of no such indifferency whethersoever is meant the one or the other The former certainly is not meant for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reacheth that to the full and more needed not to be spoken to that point The later therefore is meant but why named here with things indifferent Not because it was indifferent as well as they Nor because it was so very offensive to the Jews as were the other for they made but little of fornication themselves according to the common taking of the word fornication but fornication here seemeth to translate their word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that meaneth with them marriages in degrees prohibited which the Gentiles made no matter about and so the Apostles would bring the convert Gentiles under obedience of the Law Levit. 18. Before we part from this Council as it is commonly called we may thus far take notice of the nature of it as to observe that it was not a convention premediated and solemnly summoned but only occasional and emergent and that it was only of those Apostles and Elders that were at Jerusalem at the instant when the matter from Antioch was brought thither and the other Apostles that were abroad were not fetched in nor indeed needed any such thing for the message from Antioch required not so much the number of voices as the resolves of those Apostles that had especially to deal with the Circumcision and whom the Antiochian Church doubted not to find ready at Jerusalem The matter being determined Letters are dispatched with the Decrees unto the Churches by Paul and Barnabas and Judas and Silas they come to Antioch and there abide a while and at last go their several ways Judas to Jerusalem and Paul Barnabas and Silas away among the Gentiles It was the agreement between Paul and Barnabas on the one party and Peter Jameâ— and John on the other that those two should go among the Gentiles and these three among the Circumcision Gal. 2. 9. James abode at Jerusalem as the residentiary Apostle of that Country Gal. 2. 13. Act. 21. 18. and there at last he suffered Martyrdom Peter and John went abroad among the Jews dispersed in forreign parts so that at last you have Peter at Babylon in the East and John at Patmos in the West and by this we may guess how they parted their imployment between them When Paul and Barnabas are to set forth they disagree about Marks going with them Barnabas being his uncle would have had his company but Paul denied it because of his departure from them before Mark it seemeth was at Antioch at this time and it may be a quaere whether Peter were not there also Gal. 2. 11. and when the contest twixt Paul and Barnabas was so sharp that they part asunder Barnabas taketh Mark and Paul Silas and go their several ways and it is questionable whether they ever saw one anothers faces any more Only Paul and Mark were reconciled again and came into very near society as we shall observe afterward CHRIST LI CLAUDIUS XI ACTS CHAP. XVI PAul and Silas having travelled through Syria and Silicia come to Derbe and Lystra there he Circumciseth Timothy whom he intended to take along with him and to breed him for his successor in the Ministry after his death Timothy was a young man of very choice
bloods in the plural number That is not of the kindred descent or continued Pedegree from the Patriarchal line or the blood of Abraham Isaac Jacob and successively For John the Evangelist speaketh much to the same tenor here that John the Baptist doth Mat. 3. 9. That Christ would adopt the Heathen for the Sons of God as the Jews had been though they had no relation at all to the Jewish blood or stock Nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man The Evangelist hath traced Moses all along from the beginning of the Chapter and so he doth here He used the Phrase of the Sons of God in the Verse preceding from Gen. 6. 2. And this Clause that we have in hand he seemeth to take from the very next Verse after My Spirit shall no more strive with man because he also is flesh Where as Moses by flesh understandeth the brood of Cain men that followed the swing of lust sensuality and their own corruption and by Man the Family of Seth or Adam that was regulated by Religion and reason till that Family grew also fleshly like the other so doth John here the like For having in the next foregoing words excluded one main thing that was much stood upon from any claim or challenge towards the adopting of the Sons of God or forwarding of the new birth and that is descent from Abraham and from those holy men successively that had the promise So doth he here as much for two other which only can put in for title to the same and those are first the will of the flesh or ability of nature Secondly the will of man or power of morality Ver. 14. And the word became Flesh Now hath the Evangelist brought us to the Apollinaris from this clause the word became flesh would wickedly conclude that the word assumed not an humane soul but only humane flesh and that the Godhead served that flesh instead of a reasonable soul Conâ—uted Luke 5. 52. Mat. 26. 38. great Mystery of the Incarnation in the description of which may be observed First the two terms the word and Flesh expressing Christs two natures and the word was made or became their hypostatical union Secondly the word flesh is rather used by the Evangelist then the word man though oftentimes they signifie but the same thing as Gen. 6. 12. Psal. 65. 2. Isa. 40. 5 6. First to make the difference and distinction of the two natures in Christ the more conspicuous and that according to the common speech of the Jews who set flesh and blood in opposition to God as Matth. 16. 17. Gal. 1. 16. Secondly to magnifie the mercy of God in Christs incarnation the more in that flesh being in its own nature so far distant from the nature of God yet that he thus brought these two natures together as of them to make but one person for the reconciling of man and himself together Thirdly to confirm the truth of Christs humanity against future Heresies which have held that he had not a true and real humane body but only Fantastical or of the air Fourthly to explain what he said before that Believers became the Sons of God that is not by any change of their bodily substances but by participation of divine grace for Christ on the contrary became the Son of Man by assuming of flesh and not by changing into it Fifthly to shew the Plaister fitly applyed unto the Sore and the Physick to the Disease for whereas in us that is in our flesh there dwelleth no good but sin death and corruption he took upon him this very nature which we have so corrupted sequestring only the corruption from it that in the nature he might heal the corruption Sixthly he saith he was made or became flesh and not he was made man lest it should be conceived that Christ assumed a person for he took not the person of any man in particular but the nature of man in general Was made flesh Not by alteration but assumption not by turning of the Godhead into flesh but by taking of the Manhood into God not by leaving what he was before that is to be God but by taking on him what he was not before that is to bo man And the Evangelist saith rather He was made flesh then he assumed it i. e. that he might set out the truth and mystery of the Incarnation to the life both for the hypostatical union of the two natures and their inseparablity being so united For first whereas Nestorius said that the word was not that man that was conceived and born of the Virgin Mary but that the Virgin indeed brought forth a man and he having obtained grace in all kind of vertue had the word of God united unto him which gave him power against unclean Spirits And so he made two several Sons and two several persons of the two natures his Heresie is plainly and strongly confuted by this phrase he was made flesh which by the other he assumed it might have had more pretext and colour Secondly whereas Eutyches Valentius and others averred that Christ had not a true humane body but only a body in appearance This also confuteth them home and taketh away all probability of any such thing which the word assumed might have left more doubtful since we know that Angels assumed bodies and those bodies were not truly humane So that in this manner of speech The word was made flesh is evidently taught First that there are two distinct natures in Christ the God-head and the Man-hood for he saith not the word was turned into but was made or became flesh Secondly that these two natures do not constitute two persons but only one Christ for he saith he was made flesh and not assumed it Thirdly that this union is hypostatical or personal for he saith the word was made flesh and not joyned to it And lastly that this union is indissoluble and never to be separated For Angels in assumed bodies laid them by again and were parted from them but the word being made flesh the union is personal and not to be dissolved And dwelt among us c. That is among us his Disciples for so the next clause we saw his glory importeth And this Evangelist speaketh the same thing more at large 1 Joh. 1. 1. Full of grace and truth For these words follow next in Grammatical construction and connection lying thus And the word became flesh and dwelt among us full of grace and truth The reason of the Parenthesis and we saw his glory may seem to be First because he would explain what he meant by Us before he left it viz. us Disciples that saw his glory Secondly because the Apostles beheld not the very fulness of his grace and truth till they had beheld the fulness of that glory which he shewed on earth Grace and truth As the Soul hath tow noble faculties the understanding and the will the objects of which are
Father judgeth no man but hath committed all judgment to the Son This is but the same in sense and substance with those many places of Scripture where the Lord setteth up Christ as King and Lord of all things as Psal. 2. 7 8. c. Psal. 89. 27. Esay 9. 6 7. Heb. 1. 2 6. c. Dan. 7. 13 14. Esay 42. 1 2. c. Jer. 3. 9. Mat. 28. 18. Rev. 16. 19. c. It pleased the infinite wisdom of God to use this most divine and mysterious dispensation that the Son of God should become the Son of man and this God-man the Lord Christ should be set up the head of all Principality and power Col. 2. 9. and King and Ruler and Judge of all things And this dispensation the Scripture ascribeth to divers reasons 1. To Christs natural and essential interest as I may express it for he was the only begotten of the Father and so necessarily the heir of all things Heb. 1. 2. 2. To Gods love of the Son because he laid down his life for mans redemption Joh. 10. 17. Philip. 2. 8 9. He became obedient to the death c. Wherefore God hath also highly exalted him 3. To Gods willingness and contrival that man should have the utmost means of the knowledge and for the honouring of God that was possible namely by revealing his Son in humane flesh yet in the highest evidence of Divine power Matth. 21. 37. Heb. 1. 1. When men for all the means that he had used for the bringing of them to the knowledge of himself yet would not know God nor worship him as God but doted after Gods that were visible the Lord sends his own Son in visible shape and in visible demonstration of his Divinity in that he raised himself from the dead Rom. 1. 4. and setteth him up as Lord of all things to be worshipped as God blessed for ever and in and through him the Father to be worshipped who sent him 4. The Scripture holdeth out Christ as the arm of the Lord Esay 53. 1. 40. 10. the Combatant and Champion against Satan and all the Lords enemies Gen. 3. 15. Revel 19. 11. c. And the Lord hath set him up to reign till all these enemies be put under his feet 1 Cor. 15. 24 25. 5. God hath given him authority to execute judgment Because he is the Son of Man John 5. 27. which we shall speak to when we come to that verse Vers. 23. That all men should honour the Son even as they honour the Father The great design of the blessed Trinity was to reveal it self the eternal God-head to be worshipped Trinity in Unity and Unity in Trinity In the times of the Old Testament the Father was worshipped and acknoweledged dispensing indeed his administrations by the Son the Angel of the Covenant and the Arm of the Lord but himself more especially owned as the Fountain and Original of all Divine dispensations as Psal. 2. 6. c. Exod. 23. 20 21. Prov. 8. 22. Esai 42. 1. c. Under the New Testament the Son was visibly exalted and set up as the Lord to whom every knee should bow and every tongue confess in that he gave the Gospel as the Father had done the Law subdued Satan triumphed over death ascended visibly by his own power into heaven and did as visibly pour out and send down the Holy Ghost which he had promised That as all men had honoured the Father under the Old Testament so all men should equally honour the Son under the New The Arian in denying the God-head of Christ and his coequality with the Father is not only injurious to his person but also contradicteth the highest and greatest design of heaven for Christs exalting And the Jews Turks and whosoever take upon them to honour God and acknowledge not Christ their undertaking is but vain since they honour not the Son whom he hath set up and exalted over all Vers. 24. He that heareth my word and believeth on him that sent me These words and those in the verses following have their rise from verse 21. and lie in connexion with the sense of those words and are in explanation of them There he had said that As the father raised the dead so the Son quickneth whom he will and in these verses he speaketh to that point and in this verse he sheweth how he quickneth spiritually and in the following how he quickneth bodily and both his assertions he setteth on with this asseveration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The matter of this verse seemeth to be taken from those words in Esay 55. 3. Incline your ear and come unto me Hear and your soul shall live Upon which last words Aben Ezra giveth this gloss It meaneth that the soul abideth though the body dye or it meaneth that the Messias shall revive those that turn to the Law of God And so likewise do other Jews confess there that those words and the context before do speak of the teaching of the Messias Our Saviour in the verses before had pleaded his equal acting as he was Messias with God the Father as he shewed himself in the administration of the Old Testament that as the Father raised the dead by Prophets then so he quickened whom he pleased and as the Father had judged so now he had committed all Judgment unto him and here he cometh on with a third parallel and that is that as the Father had given the Law or the Word of the Old Testament so he should give the Gospel the Word of the New And as it was life to hearken to the Work of the Father Deut. 30. 15. 20. so he that heareth his Word hath life everlasting c. He was the Word of the Father that came out of his bosom to reveal him Joh. 1. 18. He was the great Teacher promised and expected Deut. 18. 15. Acts 3. 23. and sealed and proclaimed Matth. 17. 5. 1 Pet. 1. 17. He was to be the destroyer of the works of Satan the hearkning to whose word had been mans confusion and therefore it would not only be their piety to hearken to him who revealed the Father nor would it be only sutable to their expectation who looked for the great Teacher and were resolved to be taught by him but it would be eternal life and everlasting healing to the Soul against those wounds that hearkning to the words of the Tempter had made in it Now in that he saith And believeth on him that sent me 1. He doth most properly center the ultimate fixing and resting of belief in God the Father For as from him as from the fountain do flow all those things that are the objects of Faith in its living and moving namely free Grace the gift of Christ the way of redemption the gracious promises c. So unto him as to that Fountain doth Faith betake its self in its final repose and resting namely to God in Christ as 2 Cor. 5. 19. and he
his friends to a most miserable and intolerable imprisonment and being solicited and earnestly sued unto that he might be speedily executed and put out of his misery he flatly denyed it saying That he was not grown friends with him yet Such was the penance that he put poor Gallus to a life far worse than a present death for he ought him more spite and torture than a suddain execution The miserable man being imprisoned and straitly looked to not so much for fear of his escape by flight as of his escape by death was denyed the sight and conference of any one whosoever but him only that brought him his pitiful dyet which served only to prolong his wretched life and not to comfort it and he was forced to take it for he must by no means be suffered to dy Thus lived if it may be called a life a man that had been of the honourablest rank and office in the City lingring and wishing for death or rather dying for three years together and now at last he findeth the means to famish himself and to finish his miserable bondage with as miserable an end to the sore displeasure of the Emperour for that he had escaped him and not come to publick execution Such an end also chose Nerva one of his near friends and familiars but not like the other because of miseries past or present but because of fear and foresight of such to come His way that he took to dispatch himself of his life was by total abstinence and refusal of food which when Tiberius perceived was his intent he sits down by him desires to know his reason and begs with all earnestness of him that he would desist from such a design For what scandal saith he will it be to me to have one of my nearest friends to end his own life and no cause given why he should so die But Nerva satisfied him not either in answer or in act but persisted in his pining of himself and so dyed § 6. The miserable ends of Agrippina and Drusus To such like ends came also Agrippina and Drusus the Wife and Son of Germanicus and Mother and Brother of Caius the next Emperour that should succeed These two the Daughter in law and Grandchild of Tiberius himself had about four years ago been brought into question by his unkind and inhuman accusation and into hold and custody until this time It was the common opinion that the cursed instigation of Sejanus whom the Emperour had raised purposely for the ruine of Germanicus his house had set such an accusation on foot and made the man to be so cruel towards his own family but when the two accursed ones had miserably survived the wicked Sejanus and yet nothing was remitted of their prosecution then opinion learned to lay the fault where it deserved even on the cruelty and spite of Tiberius himself Drusus is adjudged by him to die by famine and miserable and woeful wretch that he was he sustaineth his life for nine days together by eating the flocks out of his bed being brought to that lamentable and unheard of dyet through extremity of hunger Here at last was an end of Drusus his misery but so was there not of Tiberius his cruelty towards him for he denyed the dead body burial in a fitting place he reviled and disgraced the memory of him with hideous and feigned scandals and criminations and shamed not to publish in the open Senate what words had passed from the pining man against Tiberius himself when in agony through hunger he craved meat and was denyed it Oh what a sight and hearing was this to the eyes and ears of the Roman people to behold him that was a child of their darling and delight Germanicus to be thus barbarously and inhumanely brought to his end and to hear his own Grandfather confess the action and and not dissemble it Agrippina the woeful Mother might dolefully conjecture what would become of her self by this fatal and terrible end of the poor Prince her Son And it was not long but she tasted of the very same cup both of the same kind of death and of the same kind of disgracing after For being pined after the same manner that it might be coloured that she did it of her self a death very unfitting the greatest Princess then alive she was afterward slandered by Tiberius for adultery with Gallus that died so lately and that she caused her own death for grief of his She and her Son were denyed burial befitting their degree but hid in some obscure place where no one knew which was no little distast and discontentment to the people The Tyrant thought it a special cause of boasting and extolling his own goodness that she had not been strangled nor dyed the death of common base offenders And since it was her fortune to die on the very same day that Sejanus had done two years before viz. Octob. 17. it must be recorded as of special observation and great thanks given for the matter and an annual sacrifice instituted to Jupiter on that day Caius her Son and Brother to poor Drusus took all this very well or at least seemed so to do partly glad to be shut of any one that was likely to have any colour or likelyhood of corrivality with him in his future reign and partly being brought up in such a School of dissimulation and grown so perfect a Scholar there that he wanted little of Tiberius This year he married Claudia the daughter of M. Silanus a man that would have advised him to good if he would have hearkned but afterward he matched with a mate and stock more fitting his evil nature Ennia the Wife of Macro but for advantage resigned by her Husband Macro to the adulterating of Caius and then to his marriage § 7. Other Massacres The death of Agrippina drew on Plancina's a Woman that never accorded with her in any thing but in Tiberius his displeasure and in a fatal and miserable end This Plancina in the universal mourning of the state for the loss of Germanicus rejoyced at it and made that her sport which was the common sorrow of all the State How poor Agrippina relished this being deprived of so rare a Husband can hardly be thought of without joyning with her in her just and mournfull indignation Tiberius having a spleen at the woman for some other respect had now a fair colour to hide his revenge under to call her to account and that with some applause But here his revenge is got into a strait for if he should put her to death it may be it would be some content to Agrippina and therefore not to pleasure her so much he will not pleasure the other so much neither as with present death but keepeth her in lingring custody till Agrippina be gone and then must she follow but her resoluteness preventeth the Executioner and to escape anothers she dieth by her own hand Let us make up the heap
terrible sports and when he came off victorious he caused him and his father to be slain and divers others with them inclosing them in a strong Chest or Press When once there were not enough of poor condemned wretches to cast to the wild beasts he caused divers that stood upon the Scaffolds for spectators to be cast unto them causing their tongues first to be cut out that they might not cry or complain yet did he with these cruelties mingle some plausible actions tending to popularity as creating of Knights priviledging the commons and lavishing in gifts that strengthing himself with these curtesies in the hearts of some men he might with the more confidence be cruel to other § 2 An end of Macro It cannot be expected that he should come to a good end himself that had brought so many to a bad His course is now come to tast of the same sauce that he had provided for so many others and it would half move the spectator to some kind of pity to see him slaughtered for such a cause as he was slaughtered for How he had been a means to curry Caius favour with Tiberius and to skrew him into the Empire and himself into his good opinion even by the prostitution of his own wife we have heard before and this his extraordinary officiousness he did not forelet or slacken when he had brought him where he desired to have him to the Empire But now he turned his observance a better way and what he had done before by baseness flattery and senseless obsequiousness to bring him to the rule he changeth into good counsel to keep him well in it For when he saw him fall asleep at Banquets amongst his cups he would freely check him for it as being neither for his credit nor for his safety The like would he do when he saw him misbehave himself by lightness profuse laughter and ridiculous gestures in the Theater and in beholding of plaies In brief so round and plain was he with him when he saw just cause that in fine the uncounselable humorist became his enemy and at last his death His end is reported to have been the same with young Tiberius forced to slay himself and Ennia his wife or the wife of Caius whether you will to have been constrained to the same extremity and end with him An end well befitting and well deserved of them both but from all men living least deserved from Caius Philo after the death of Macro placeth the death of M. Silanus which upon the warrant of Dion we have set before and in things so indifferent will not spend labour to examine PART II. The JEWISH Story § 1. Troubles of the Jews in Alexandria FLACCUS Avilius was now Governour of Aegyt and had been so for some years before A man that ruled well while Tiberius lived but after his death could not govern himself For when he heard of the death of the old Emperour and the succession of the new sorrow for the one and fear of the other did so transport him besides himself that forgetting the bravery and glory wherewith he had governed hitherto he let loose the reins of himself to these two passions and the reins of the government to desperate carelesness and neglect He did nothing but weep for the loss of old Tiberius to whom he had been very intimate and dear and he might well weep the more because he could meet hardly with any that would bear any part and share in that sorrow with him This his grief was augmented by the fear that he had of Caius and of his displeasure and that by the intelligence that his conscience gave him that he had deserved it partly for his propensity to young Tiberius and siding with him but chiefly because he had had some hand or at least some consent and inclination to the death of Agrippina Caius his Mother Both these his miserable passions were brought to their height when he heard of the death of young Tiberius and of his old friend Macro The thought of these two was the only comfort he had against his dejectedness and discontent for all his hope was that these two might make his peace with Caius whose displeasure he so much doubted But what must he do now when they cannot make their own peace He yeeldeth himself therefore wholly to his discontented mood and neglecteth utterly both himself and the State His old friends he groweth jealous of and rejecteth his professed enemies he receiveth to his favour and to his counsels These rule him that should have ruled Egypt and he had done it worthily but now is drawn any whither that ill advise fullenness and melancholy doth direct him These his wicked Counsellors invent a course to procure his peace and the Emperours favour a course indeed bloody barbarous and inhumane but such as suited with their own malice and as it proved took place with the Governors desperateness and cowardize if so be he may be called a Governor still Caius the Emperour say they is an enemy to the Jews and a friend to the Alexandrians Let this be the opportunity whereby to work thy reconciliation to suffer the City to rise against the Jews and to commit outrage upon them and thou canst not perform an act more acceptable to the Prince nor more profitable for thy self The wretched Flaccus that took to heart no mans misery but his own and cared not who suffered so he might escape gave ear to this damnable and devilish counsel and put it in practice first plotting mischief against the Jews in secret then oppressing them in judgment and in their suites openly and at the last professing and publishing himself their resolved enemy § 2. Agrippa at Alexandria an unexpected and unwilling occasion of further troubles Those incendiaries that had kindled this fire will be sure to lose no blast that may make it flame and keep it burning Agrippa that had not long ago departed from Alexandria a poor private man returneth now thither in prosperity and a King Caius that had promoted him to his kingdom did lovingly direct him by Alexandria as the safest way to it Thither he came with as great privacy as such a personage could do and yet was he espied by the jealous eyes of these rare counsellours and his coming misconstrued through their malice to the Jews They perswade Flaccus that his coming thither was an affront to him in his own Province that his Pomp and Train was more sumptuous than his that the eyes of all men were upon the new King Agrippa and in short that his presence there was his present disgrace and would prove his future disadvantage The ill governed Governour was ready enough to hearken to such buzzings as these and to yeeld them impression in his mind yet durst he not put any thing in execution against the King for fear of him that sent him He therefore thought it best to carry a fair outside to Agrippa and to his
Apostle or Antioh a chief Church above others more than by humane preferring or Antioch yet a Church and were all these proved which never will be yet is the inference or argumentation thereupon but of small value and validity 6. His last Argument is from Authorities which at last he gathereth into the Center of a Councel at Rome pag. 332. But Amicus Plato amicus Aristoteles magis amica veritas As for his answers to Eusebius that calleth Evodius the first Bishop of Antioch his answer to Ignatius that saith he was placed there by the Apostels more than one and to Onuphrius that maketh Peter Bishop of Rome before he was Bishop of Antioch be they referred to the perusal of his own Text for the matter is not worth the labour of examining them Vers. 32. Lydda This seemeth to be the same with Lod 1 Chron. 8. 12. A City in the Tribe of Benjamin mentioned Ezra 2. 33. Vers. 35. Saron Heb. Sharon A fertile valley famous in Scriptures as 1 Chron. 27. 29. Esa. 33. 9. Cant. 2. 1 c. where the Targum renders it the garden of Eden and the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a field or plain the masculine Article sheweth it is not named of a City And so do the LXX article it Esa. 33. 9. There is mention of a Sharon beyond Jordan 1 Chron. 5. 16. inhabited about by Gileadites by which it seemeth it was a common name for plain champion grounds wheresoever Vers. 36. Tabitha which by interpretation is called Dorcas Tabitha the Syriack and Dorcas the Greek do both signifie a Hind or Doe Capream as Beza renders it Now the reason why Luke doth thus render the one into the other seemeth to be because Tabitha was a Grecizing Jewesse and so was commonly called by these two names by the Syrian among the Hebrews and by the Greek among the Greeks Vers. 37. Whom when they had washed Whether it were a common custom among the Jews to wash all their dead bodies before they buried them as is concluded by many upon this place we will not insist to question nor whether it were in token of the resurrection or no as some apply it only the other application that they make hereupon I cannot pass over untouchâ—â— which is that Paul spake in reference to this custom and to that intention is this custom when he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 1 Cor. 15. 29. Else what shall they do which are baptised for the dead c. as our English reads it as if the Apostle produced this custom as an argument for the resurrection as meaning to what purpose should dead bodies be washed if not to betoken this thus he is conceived to argue whereas by the juncture of the thirtieth verse to this it seemeth that he intended a clean contrary or different thing by being baptized 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 namely being baptized so as baptism signifieth death by matyrdom or suffering for the truth as Matth. 20. 22 23. Luke 12. 50. And his arguing is to this sense if the dead rise not again what will become of those that are baptized with a martyrial baptism or that do suffer death for the profession of the truth why are they then baptized for the dead yea and why stand we in jeopardy every hour of such a baptism and matyrdom also Why do they suffer and why are we daily in danger to suffer for the truth if there be no resurrection And so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie not vice or supra but pro that is in such a sense and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to mean In such a sense as baptized meaneth dead or martyred As 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken in this clause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Fabius delivered the power or Army to Minucius under this intent and meaning or condition that he should not fight Plut. in Fab. § They laid her in an upper chamber This probably was the publick meeting room for the believers of that Town Dorcas being a woman of some good rank as may be conjectured by her plenteousness of good works and alms-deeds Now they purposely disposing of the dead corps that Peter if he would come might exercise a miracle upon it they lay it in that publick room that the company might be spectators of the wonder but Peter would not suffer them so to be for some singular reason vers 40. Acts X. § Some things remarkable about the calling in of Cornelius First the Gospel had now dilated it self to the very utmost bounds of the Jews territories in Canaan Judaea Samaria and Galilee had been preached to and through and now is it got to the very walls of their dominions round about And there wanteth nothing but laying the partition wall flat that the Gospel may get out unto the Gentiles and that is done in this Chapter where the great partition and distance that was betwixt Jew and Gentile is utterly removed and taken away by God himself who had first pitched and set it betwixt them Secondly the two first and mainest stones of interposition that were laid in this wall were circumcision and diet the one in the time of Abraham Gen. 17. the other in the time of Jacob Gen. 32. 32. And in reference to these two it is that they of the Circumcision contend with Peter upon his return to Jerusalem for they are grieved that he went in to men uncircumcised and ate with them Chap. 11. 3. These were the proper distinguishers betwixt Israel and other Nations for all their other Ceremonies were not so much to distinguish them from other people as to compose them among themselves and towards God they being first distinguished from others by these Of these two singularity of Dyet or Prohibition of certain meats was the more proper difference and the more strict distinctive For all the seed of Abraham was circumcised and so in regard of that Ceremony there was no difference betwixt an Ismaelite and a Jew But abstaining from such and such meats was a proprium quarto modo a singularity that differenced an Israelite from all the world besides Thirdly therefore it was most proper and of most divine reason that the liberty of eating any meats did denote and shew a liberty of conversing with any nation and that the inlarging of the one is the inlarging of the other Fourthly the first-fruits of this inlargement and entertainment beyond the partition wall is Cornelius a Convert but not a Proselyte a man that was already come in to God but not come in to the Church of Israel a man as far contrarily qualified for such a business in all humane appearance as what could be most contrary as being a Roman a Souldier a Centurion and yet he of all men chosen to be the first-fruits of the Gentiles that God herein might be the more plainly shewed to be no respecter of persons Fifthly it had been now 2210 years since the Heathen were cast
170. His Allegories make him impious and he counteth the story of Paradise to be but foolery if it be taken litteral Pag. 180. He talketh a Rabinical tale about the invention of Musick He constantly followeth the LXX as appeareth pag. 160 179 218 245 255. Pag. 190. He maketh God and his wisdom as it were father and mother of whom the world was generate but not humano more Ibid. He readeth that place Prov. 8. 22. The Lord created me the first of his works For saith he it was necessary that all things that came to generation should be younger than the mother and nurse of all things Pag. 191. He is very uncivil with Jethro Pag. 205. He holdeth Lots wife to have been turned into a stone Pag. 206. He was in the Theater at a play Pag. 213. He holdeth Isaac weaned at seven years old And mentioneth certain Dialogues made by himself personating Isaac and Ismael He calleth cap. 32. of Deuteronomy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Canticum majus according to the Rabbins phrase so likewise pag. 179. Pag. 214. Jacob praying for Joseph saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is very questionable where this speech is to be found Pag. 223. The spirit of God is an immortal knowledge Pag. 232. He treateth de Printogenito secundogenito Dei that is of his Word and the World Pag. 234. He holdeth freewil but it is in comparison of the actions of men with the effects of Plants and Bruits Pag. 241. He is fallen out with Joseph again Pag. 251. He telleth a fable how all Birds and Beasts spake the same Language and understood one another but that their Tongue was confounded because they petitioned that they might never grow old but renew their youth as the Serpent doth who is the basest of them But this is more than enough for a taste we shall conclude this Character with that Apophthegme that came from him when Caius was in a rage against him and his fellow Commissioners How ought we to chear up saith he though Caius be angry at us in words seeing in his deeds he even opposeth God Josephus relateth it Antiq. lib. 18. cap. 10. PART III. The ROMAN Story §. 1. Caius still foolish and cruel THIS year did Caius make an expedition to the Ocean as if he would have passed over into Britain but the greatest exploit that he did was that first he went a little upon the Sea and then returning he gave a signal to his Souldiers that they should fall to battail which was nothing else but that they should gather cockles and shells upon the shoar and so he returned with these goodly spoils and brought them to Rome in a foolish triumph as if he had conquered the Ocean being come into the City he had like to have slain all the Senate because they had not decreed divine honours and worship to him But he became reconciled to them again upon this occasion Protogenes his bloodhound that used to carry his two Books or Black-bills the one whereof he called a Sword and the other a Dagger in which Books he inrolled whom he destined to death or punishment he coming one day into the Court and being saluted and fawned upon by all the Senate was among them all saluted by Scribonius Proculus Upon whom looking with a grim and displeased countenance What saith he dost thou salute me that hatest so deadly the Emperor my Master Whereupon the rest of the Senators arose came upon him and pulled him in pieces With this piece of service so well suiting with the Tyrants humor he was so well pleased that he said they had now regained his favour again Under his cruelty this year perished by name Ptolomy the son of King Juba because he was rich Cassius Becillinus for no crime at all and Capito his father because he could not indure to look upon his sons death Flattery delivered L. Vitellius our late Governor of Syria and it was much to appease such a Lion but that it was a flattery without parallel §. 2. Caius profane The blasphemous Atheist continued still in his detestable Deity being what God he would when he would and changing his Godship with the change of his cloths sometimes a male Deity sometime a female sometime a God of one fashion sometime of another Sometime he was Jupiter sometime Juno sometimes Mars sometimes Venus sometime Neptune or Appollo or Hercules and sometimes Diana and thus whilst he would be any thing he was nothing and under the garb of so many gods he was indeed nothing but Devil He built a Temple for himself in Rome and made himself a room in the Capitol that he might as he said converse with Jupiter But it seems Jupiter and he fell out for he removed his own mansion and built himself a Temple in the Palace because he thought that if Jupiter and he shared in the same Temple Jupiter would have the upper hand and the more repute Therefore that his own Deity might have room enough he built this new Temple and that he might be sure to get equal worship with Jupiter he intended to set up the statue of Jupiter Olympius there but pictured directly after his own Image so that it must have been Jupiters statue but Caius his picture Jupiturs trunk but Caius his head and face but this fine design came to nothing and was clean spoiled for the Ship that went for this statue was spoiled with lightning and there was a great laughing always heard whensoever any one went about to meddle with the picture to forward the business and truly it was as fit an Omen as likely could have been invented for it When this invention thus failed him he found out a new trick to get part of the Temple of Castor and Pollux for himself and joyned it to the Palace and he so contrived the matter that his entrance was just in the middle between those two gods and therefore he called them his Porters and himself he stiled the Dialis and his dear Caesonia and his uncle Claudius and divers of the richer sort he ordained to be his Priests and got a good sum of money of every one of them for their Office nay he would be a Priest unto himself and which best suited with him in such a function he admitted his Horse to be fellow Priest with him and because he would be a right Jupiter indeed he would have his tricks to imitate thunder and lightning and he would ever be defying Jupiter in Homers speech Either take me away or I will take thee And thus was his Palace parted into a sensless contrariety one part to be a Temple and another part a common Stews in one Caius to be adored as a god in another Caius to play the Beast deflowring Virgins violating Boys adulterating Matrons exacting and extracting Money from all and using to tumble himself in heaps of Money which he had so gotten THE CHRISTIAN HISTORY THE Jewish and the Roman Of the Year of CHRIST
and they say he is not able to bear forty then he is quit they allot him to receive eighteen and as he is in whipping they say he is able to bear forty yet he is quit How do they whip him His hands are tied to two pillars or posts and the Officer of the Court lays hold of his garments and rip or rent it is no matter he pulls them down till he have bared his breast Now there was a stone lay behind him upon which the Officer of the Court stood with a whip of whit-leather in his hand platted four plats and two lashes hanging by it the handle was a hand bredth long and the whip a hand bredth broad and the end of it raught to his belly A third part of his stripes he gave him before on his belly two parts behind And he beats him not standing nor sâ—â—ting but bowed down as it is said The Judge shall cause him to lie down and he strikes him with one hand with all his might And in the mean while one standing by reads or says these portions of Scripture But if thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this Law c. Then the Lord will make thy plagues wonderful and the plagues of thy seed c. Deut. 28. 58 59. And therefore ye shall keep the words of this Covenant c. And he concludes with But he being full of compassion forgives iniquity and destroyeth not Psal. 78. 28. This was the manner of their scourging a very sharp penalty thirteen lashes with a three-lash whip which by that triplication arose to forty save one or if the number were allotted less yet it was as many stripes as they conceived the party could bear 2. There was the penalty of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Rebels beating the beating or the mawling by the people which was a terrible rugged beating by all the people without any sentence of the Judges passed upon him at all and without any measure As in divers cases if a man were deprehended faulty in such or such an offence the people made no more ado but fell upon him pell mell with fists staves or stones and mawled him unmeasurably and very often to death Rabbi Nathan describes it thus b b b Aruch in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The beating according to the Law is of those that transgress against negative precepts and it is by measure and for admonition and with a three corded whip But he that transgresseth against affirmative speeches they beat him till his life depart and not with a threefold whip And likewise whosoever transgresseth against the words of the wise men they beat him without number and measure and they call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Rebels beating because he hath rebelled against the words of the Law and against the words of the Scribes The reason of this beating c c c Gloss. in Maym. in Sobbath per. 1. saith another Jew is because he transgressed against a prohibition of theirs in a thing which hath its foundation in the Law and he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Son of Rebellion The frequent taking up of stones by the People to have stoned our Saviour and that incursion upon him Mat. 26. 67. and upon Stephen Act. 7. 57 58. for blasphemy as they would have it and upon Paul Act. 21. 31. for defiling the Temple as they supposed were of this nature Thus he that committed a transgression for which he became liable either to Death by the hand of Heaven or to Cutting off he did not escape barely with that liableness but either he was to be whipt or thus mawled or in some cases was to suffer death by the sentence of the Judges d d d Maym. in Blath Mikdash per. 4. Every negative precept saith Maymony upon which they become liable to death by the hand of Heaven they are beaten for it Much more where there is a liableness to cutting off which is the greater guilt And the same Author e e e Id. in San. per 19. reckons eighteen offences that fell under liableness to death by the Hand of Heaven and for which the Offenders were whipt and twenty one that fell under liableness to cutting off and for which the Offenders were also whipt and were not put to death by the Judges Amongst those transgressions that deserved these penalties going into the Sanctuary in uncleanness fell under as many of them as any one offence whatsoever It were too tedious to insist upon all particulars let us take up these few and guess and conjecture of the rest by them A Priest or any other that went into the Court being unclean fell under the guilt of being cut off and if they served there in their uncleanness the Priest at the Altar and any other person in laying on of his hands on the sacrifice or waving any part of it they then became liable to death by the hand of Heaven And such a Priest being deprehended thus faulty f f f Id in Biath Mikd. ubi supr they never brought him before the Sanhedrin g g g Talm. in Schedr per. 9. but the young men of the Priests thrust him out of the Court and dasht out his brains with the billets And the like they did by the other persons A Leper that entred into the Mountain of the House was beaten with eighty stripes He that was defiled by the dead or unclean for a day if he went into the Court of the Women he was to be beaten with the Rebels beating And so was he that came in having eaten or drunk any unclean thing or after a seven days uncleanness would go into the Court of Israel before his atonement was made And he that brought in a Vessel or came in any Clothes which one that was defiled by the dead had toucht was to be whipt And not to multiply particulars whosoever came within the holy Ground being unclean and knowing of it and yet would come in he incurred the guilt of cutting off ipso facto and if he were discovered and the matter proved by witness he was sure either to be whipt or else to be mawled with the Rebels beating the former always most terrible the latter deadly very oft It is indeed a common saying among the Talmudick Writers that for such or such offences though a man be not whipt yet is he beaten with the Rebels beating as if the latter were the gentler castigation they do not mean that the Rebels beating was the less penalty but they intend this that though there be no express in the Law that appoints his whipping yet the decrees of the Wise-men which he hath broken appoint him to be beaten h h h Talm. in Maccoth per. 3. Whosoever had incurred the guilt of being Cut off after he is whipt is acquitted from that guilt as it is said Lest thy brother be vile in thine eyes Behold after he is whipt he
came himself and lay upon him with his mouth to the Childs mouth his eyes to his eyes and his hands to his hands then the Child recovered So when man was dead in trespasses and sin as it is Eph. 2. God lays his * * * Psal. 23. staff or rod of the Law upon him but what good did this toward his recovery Even make him to long the more for Elisha or Christ who when he came and laid his mouth to mans mouth and kissed humanity in his Incarnation and laid his eyes to his eyes and his hands to his hands and suffered for mans actions at his passion then is man recured God in the book of Isay when he is to send a Prophet to Israel says thus Mi eshlah whom shall I send or who will go for us Isa. 6. 8. Upon which words the Jew Kimchi paraphrases thus Shalahti eth Micah wehem maccim otho Shalahti eth Amos wehem korin otho * * * Amos in Heb. signifies one that is heavy tongued which Kimchi calls Peseleusa from the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Blaesus Pesilusa I have sent Micah and him they smote I have sent Amos and him they called a stammerer Whom shall I send or who will go for us Then says Esay Behold I am here send me Imagine that upon the fall of man you saw God about to send the great Prophet not to Israel alone but to all the World nor only to teach but also to redeem Suppose you heard him thus questioning whom shall I send to restore fallen man And who will go for us Should I send Angels They are creatures and consequently finite and so cannot answer mine infinite Justice Should I send man himself Alas though he once had power not to have fallen yet now hath he no power to raise himself again Should I send beasts to sacrifice themselves for him Alas can the burning of dead beasts satisfie for the sins of all men alive Whom shall I send or who will go for us Our Saviour is ready to answer with Isay Behold I am here send me Here am I that am able to do it send me for I am willing I am able for I am God I am willing for I will become a man I am God and so can fulfil the Law which man hath broke I will become man that so I may suffer death which man hath deserved Behold I am here send me Then as one of our Country Martyrs at his death so may we sing all our lives None but Christ none but Christ None but Christ to cure the wounded travailor None but Christ to raise the dead Shunamite None but Christ to restore decaid mankind None but Christ that would None but Christ that could No Angel no Man no Creature no Sacrifice no Ceremony that would and could do this for us which we could not do for our selves and say for us I have trod the Winepress alone When the Ceremonial and Judicial Law have thus brought us to Christ we may shake hands with them and farewel but for the Moral as it helps to bring us thither so must it help to keep us there For Christ came not to disannul this Law but to fulfil it He does not acquit us from this but furthers us to the keeping of it What else is the Gospel but this in milder terms of Faith and Repentance which is since we cannot keep this Law yet to strive to keep it as we can and to repent us for that we have not kept it and to relie upon his merits that hath kept it for us Thus as love to God and to our neighbours was the sum of the Old so true faith and unfained repentance is the total of the New This was the tenour of Christs first words after his Baptism Mark 1. 15. and of his last words before his Ascension Mark 16. 16. CHAP. LXI Of the Ten Commandments THE Ten Commandments may be called the Word of the Word of God for though all Scripture be his Word yet these in more special be his Scripture to which he made himself his own Scribe or Pen-man upon these Commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets and these Commandments upon two duties to love God and to love our neighbour A shorter and yet a fuller Comment needs not to be given of them than what our Saviour hath given Luke 10. 27. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy strength and with all thy mind and thy neighbour as thy self The four Commandments of the first Table he expounds in four words The Lord thy God there is the Preface I am the Lord c. Thou shalt love the Lord c. with all thy Heart for the First Commandment Soul for the Second Commandment Strength for the Third Commandment Mind for the Fourth Commandment If we need any further Exposition upon this Exposition of our Saviours it is easie to find as thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine Heart for it he hath Created Soul for it he hath Redeemed Strength for it he hath Preserved Mind for it he hath Inlightned And therefore thou shalt love him with all thine Heart without Only talking and no more Soul without Dissembling Strength without Revolting Mind without Erring This is the first and the great Commandment and the other is like unto this thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self This adds great light to the second Table for half of the Commandments of that Table want an object whereupon to fasten the duty The first hath one Honour thy Father c. the last but one hath one thou shalt not witness falsely against thy neighbour And so the last hath Thou shalt not covet ought of thy Neighbours But Thou shalt not kill steal and commit adultery these have no object viz. none named whom from whom and with whom we must not kill steal nor adulterate because we must make our selves also the object here and reflect the Commandments upon our selves as thus Thou shalt not kill first not thy self and secondly not thy neighbour and so of the rest The Jews have been too bold in adding too strict an object as you may see in their explaining these three precepts And some Hereticks have been too nice in giving some of them too * * * For Marcion held it unlawful to kill a beast because the command non occides hath no set object Aug. de Clv. Dei l. 1. cap. 20. large a one The fifth Commandment in the Ten is with a Promise and the fifth Petition in the Lords Prayer is with a Condition I omit the exquisiteness of the pricking of this piece of Scripture of the Commandments extraordinarily Some special thing is in it The Jews do gather six hundred and thirteen Precepts Negative and Affirmative to be in the whole Law according to the six hundred and thirteen letters in the two Tables and so many
is and I will do it a a a a a a Hieros I have done my duty that the Command may be performed according to it The Aruch thus As though he should say There is no man can shew me wherein I have transgressed 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Pharisee of fear such as Iob. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Pharisee of love as Abraham 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 b b b b b b Hieros Among all these none is worthy to be loved but the Pharisee of love Whether Pharisaism ran out into any of these Sects in the days of the Baptist we dispute not Let it be granted that the best and the most modest of that order came to his baptism the best of the Pharisees certainly were the worst of men And it is so much the more to be wondred at that these men should receive his baptism after that manner as they did when it was highly contrary to the rule of the Pharisees to converse among the common people of whom there was so great a concourse to John and highly contrary to the Doctrine of the Pharisees so much as to dream of any righteousness besides that which was of the works of the Law which the Doctrine of John diametrically contradicted The original of the Sadducees learned men as well Jews as Christians do for the most part refer to one Zadoc a Scholar of Antigonus Socheus which Antigonus took the chief seat in the Sanhedrin after the death of Simeon the Just. Of him thus speaks the Tract Avoth c c c c c c Chap. 1. Antigonus of Socho received Traditions of Simeon the Just. He said Be not as servants who wait upon their Master for the sake of the reward but be ye like servants who wait upon their Master not for the sake of the reward but let the fear of the Lord rule you The Wise man saith Rambam upon the place had two Scholars Zadoc and Baithus who when they heard this from their Master said among themselves when they were gone away our Master in his Exposition teacheth us that there is neither reward nor punishment nor any expectation at all for the future For they understood not what he meant Therefore they mutually strengthned one another and departed from the rule and forsook the Law and some company adhered to both The Wise men therefore called them Sadducees and Baithusees And a little after But in these Countries namely in Egypt they call them Karaites 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but Sadducees and Baithusees are their Names among the Wise men d d d d d d Chap. 5. See also the Avoth of R. Nathan e e e e e e Bab. Berac fol. 5◠Yet that raiseth a scruple here At the conclusion of all prayers in the Temple they said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for ever But when the Hereticks brake in and said There was no age but one it was appointed to be said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For ever and ever or from age to age Upon these words thus the Gloss In the first Temple they said only Blessed be the Lord God of Israel for ever But when the Hereticks brake in and said There was no age but this Ezra and his consistory appointed that it should be said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For ever and ever or from age to age to imply there is a double world this and one to come to root out of the heart the opinion of those that deny the Resurrection of the dead Take notice Reader that there were some who denied the Resurrection of the dead in the days of Ezra when as yet Zadoc the father of the Sadducees was not born After Ezra and his great Synagogue which indured many a year after Ezra was dead sat Simeon the Just performing the office of the High Priest for the space of forty years and Antigonus Socheus the Master of Zadoc succeeded him in the chair of the Sanhedrin So that although the Sadducees with good reason do bear an ill report for denying the Resurrection and that was their principal Heresie yet that Heresie was when as yet there were no Hereticks called by the name of Sadducees To which perhaps those words do agree which sufficiently taste of such a Heresie Ye have said it is in vain to serve God c. Mal. III. 14. It is not therefore to be denied that the Sadducee Hereticks were so named from Zadoc but that the Heresie of the Sadducees concerning the Resurrection was older than that name one may suppose not without reason nor that that cursed Doctrine first arose from the words of Antigonus illy understood by Zadoc and Baithus but was of an antienter original when as yet the Prophets Zacharias Malachi and Ezra himself were alive if that Ezra were not the same with Malachi as the Jews suppose Therefore I do rather think that Heresie sprang from the misunderstanding of the words of Ezekiel Chap. XXXVII which some understanding according to the letter and together with it seeing no Resurrection dreamt that there would be none afterwards And this Doctrine encreased and exalted it self into a Sect when at length Zadoc and Baithus asserted that it was so determined out of the Chair by their Master Antigonus the President of the Sanhedrin When I fetch the rise of the Sadducees not much after the death of Simeon the Just that does not unseasonably come into my mind which is mentioned by the Talmudists that the state of things became worse after his death f f f f f f Hieros Ioma fol. 43. 3. All the days of Simeon the Just the scape Goat had scarce come to the middle of the precipice of the Mountain whence he was cast down but he was broken into pieces but when Simeon the Just was dead he fled away alive into the desert and was eaten by Saracens While Simeon the Just lived the lot of God in the day of Expiation went forth always to the right hand Simeon the Just being dead it went forth sometimes to the right hand and sometimes to the left All the days of Simeon the Just the little scarlet Tongue looked always white but when Simeon the Just was dead it sometimes looked white and sometimes red All the days of Simeon the Just the West light always burnt but when he was dead it sometimes burnt and sometimes went out All the days of Simeon the Just the fire upon the Altar burnt clear and bright and after two pieces of wood laid on in the morning they laid on nothing else the whole day but when he was dead the force of the fire languished in that manner that they were compelled to supply it all the day All the days of Simeon the Just a blessing was sent upon the two loaves and the Shewbread so that a portion came to every Priest to the quantity of an Olive at least and there were some who eat till they were satisfied and there were
morrow when I come into the Consistory do thou come forth and question me about this matter The Disciple stood forth and askt Rabban Gamaliel then President of the Sanhedrin of what kind is Evening Prayer He answers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is a thing of duty But behold saith the other R. Joshua saith it is a thing at pleasure Saith Gamaliel to Joshua dost thou affirm it to be a thing at pleasure He saith unto him No. Stand upon thy feet saith the other that they may witness against thee Rabban Gamaliel was then sitting and expounding Probably this very Article R. Joshua stood on his feet till all the people cryed out to him They say to R. Hotspith the Interpreter Dismiss the people They say to R. Zenon the Chazan say Begin ye and they said begin thou So all the people rose up and stood on their feet They said unto him Who is it thy wickedness hath not toucht they went out streight way and made R. Eleazar ben Azariah President of the Council 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 How many seats were there R. Jacob ben Susi saith fourscore seats for the disciples of the wise beside those who stood behind the bars R Jose cen Bon saith thirty beside those that stood behind the bars We have the same i i i i i i In Bab. Beracoth fol. 27. 2. Story This we transcribed the larglier not only for proof of what we said of the Disciples asking the Doctors Questions in the Court but that the Reader might have a little sight of the manner of that Court and how there were many not only of the Disciples of the wise but others too that flockt thither II. We may further add k k k k k k Mâ—iâ—… Sanhedr cap. 1. In a City where there are not two great wise men one fit to teach and instruct in the whole Law the other whoknows how to hear and ask and answer they do not constitute a Sanhedrin although there were a thousand Israelites there c. l l l l l l Sanhedr fol. 17. 2. In a City where there are not two that may speak and one that may hear they do not constitute a Sanhedrin In Bitter there were three In Jabneh four viz. R. Eliezer R. Joshua R. Akibah and Simeon the Temanite 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He judged before them sitting on the ground By him who hears they mean one skillful in the Traditions that can propound questions and answer every question propounded Such an one was Simeon the Temanite who though he was a man of that learning yet not being promoted to become one of the Elders he sate upon the ground that is not on any of the benches of the Fathers of the Sanhedrin but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on one of the seats that were near the ground for they speak these things as done in the times after the death of Gamaliel There is nothing absurd therefore in it if we should suppose Christ gotten into the very Sanhedrin it self Thither Joseph and his Mother might come and seeking him might find him on the benches of the Fathers of the Council for that time they having found him so capable both to propound questions and answer them For it is plain they did admit of others for other reasons to sit sometimes in their seats m m m m m m Sanhedr fol. 40. 1. And it is less wonder if they suffer him to sit amongst them being but twelve years of age whenas they promoted R. Eleazar ben Azariah to the Presidency it self when he was but sixteen n n n n n n Hierosol ubi supr But if it was in a lower Court it is still less wonder if he sate amongst them But that which might be chiefly enquired is whether Christ sate amongst them as one of their disciples this indeed is hardly credible CHAP. III. VERS II. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Annas and Caiphas being High-Priests 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a a a a a a Hierosal Sanhedr fol. 29. 1. They do constitute two High-Priests at one time True indeed but they promoted a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sagan together with an High-Priest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 b b b b b b Juchasin fol. 57. 1. out of Rambam The Sagan as to his degree was the same to the High-Priest as he that was next or second to the King They substituted indeed on the Vespers of the day of expiation another Priest to the High-Priest that should be in readiness to perform the office for the day if any uncleanness should by chance have befallen the High-Priest c c c c c c Joma caâ— 1 d d d d d d Hieros Hâ—raioth fol. 47. 4. It is storied of Ben Elam of Zipporim that when a Gonorrhea had seized the High-Priest on the day of expiation he went in and performed the Office for that day And another story of Simeon ben Kamith that as he was walking with the King on the Vespers of the day of expiation his Garments were toucht with another's spittle so that Judah his Brother went in and ministred On that day the Mother of them saw her two Sons High-Priests It is not without reason controverted whether the Sagan were the same with this deputed Priest the Jews themselves dispute it I would be on the negative part for the Sagan was not so much the Vice-High-Priest as if I may so speak one set over the Priests The same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the ruler of the Temple of whom we have such frequent mention amongst the Doctors upon him chiefly did the care and charge of the Service of the Temple lye 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 e e e e e e Joma capâ— hal 1. The ruler of the Temple saith to them go out and see if it be time to slay the Sacrifice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Ruler saith come and cast your lots who shall slay the f Tamid cap. 3. hal 1. Sacrifice who shall sprinkle the blood c. The gloss is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Ruler is the Sagan He is commonly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Sagan of the Priests Which argues his supremacy amongst the Priests rather than his Vicegerency under the High-Priest g g g g g g Sanhedr fol. 19. 2. When the High-Priest stands in the circle of those that are to comfort the mourners 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Sagan and he that is anointed for the battle stand on his right hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the head of the Fathers house those that mourn and all the people stand on his left hand Mark here the order of the Sagan He is below the High-Priest but above the Heads of all the Courses 2 Kings XXIII 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Priests of the second order Targum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Sagan of the Priests And Chap. XXV 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
amongst them yet were they not exactly Eleven then for Thomas was absent Joh. XX. 24. 2. When the Eleven are mentioned we must not suppose it exactly meant of the number of Apostles then present but the present number of the Apostles VERS XXXVII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They supposed they had seen a Spirit WHereas the Jews distinguished between Angels and Spirits and Daemons Spirits are defined by R. Hoshaiah l l l l l l Beresh rabb◠fol. 34. 2. to be such to whom souls are created but they have not a body made for those souls But it is a question whether they included all spirits or souls under this notion when it is more than probable that apparitions of Ghosts or deceased persons who once had a body were reckoned by them under the same title Nor do I apprehend the Disciples had any other imagination at this time than that this was not Christ indeed in his own person as newly raised from the dead but a Spectrum only in his shape himself being still dead And when the Pharisees speak concerning Paul Acts XXIII 9. That if an Angel or a Spirit hath spoken to him I would easily believe they might mean it of the Apparition of some Prophet or some other departed just person than of any soul that had never yet any body created to it I the rather incline thus to think because it is so evident that it were needless to prove how deeply impressed that Nation was with an opinion of the Apparitions of departed Ghosts VERS XLIV 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the Law of Moses and in the Prophets and in the Psalms IT is a known division of the Old Testament into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Law the Prophets and the Holy Writings by abbrevation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I. The Books of the Law and their order need not be insisted upon called commonly by us the Pentateuch but by some of the Rabbins the Heptateuch and by some Christians the Octateuch m m m m m m Schabb. fol. 116. 1. R. Samuel bar Nachman saith R. Jonathan saith Wisdom hath hewn out her seven Pillars Prov. IX 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These are the seven Books of the Law The Book of Numbers compleats the seven Books of the Law But are there not but five Books only Ben Kaphra saith the Book of Numbers is made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 three Books From the beginning of the Book to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And it came to pass when the Ark set forward Chap. X. 35. is a Book by it self That verse and the following is a Book by it self And from thence to the end of the Book is a Book by it self The reason why they accounted this period Chap. X. 35. 36. to be one Book by it self was partly because it does not seem put there in its proper place partly because in the beginning of it it hath the letter Nun inverted thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so after the end of it in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in both places is set for a boundary and limit to distinguish that period from the rest of the Book Whatever therefore goes before from the beginning of the Book to that period is reckoned by them for one Book and whatever follows it for another Book and the period it self for a third Eulogius speaking concerning Dosthes or Dositheus a famous seducer of the Samaritans hath this passage n n n n n n Apud Phot. Cod. ccxxx 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. He adulterated the Octateuch of Moses with spurious writings and all kind of corrupt falsifyings There is mention also of a Book with this title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 o o o o o o Cod. xxxvi The Christians Book An Exposition upon the Octateuch Whether this was the Octateuch of Moses it is neither certain nor much worth our enquiry for Photius judgeth him a corrupt Author besides that it may be shewn by and by that there was a twofold Octateuch besides that of Moses Now if any man should ask how it come to pass that Eulogius and that probably from the common notion of the thing should divide the Books of Moses into an Octateuch I had rather any one else rather than my self should resolve him in it But if any consent that he owned the Heptateuch we have already mentioned we should be ready to reckon the last Chapter of Deuteronomy for the eighth part Aben Ezra will smile here who in that his obscure and disguised denial of the Books of the Pentateuch as if they were not writ by the pen of Moses he instances in that Chapter in the first place as far as I can guess as a testimony against it You have his words in his Commentary upon the Book of Deuteronomy a little from the beginning p p p p p p Cap. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But if you understand the mystery of the twelve c. i. e. of the twelve Verses of the last Chapter of the Book for so his own Country-men expound him thou wilt know the truth i. e. that Moses did not write the whole Pentateuch an argument neither worth answering nor becoming so great a Philosopher For as it is a ridiculous thing to suppose that Chapter that treats of the death and burial of Moses should be written by himself so would it not be much less ridiculous to affix that Chapter to any other volume than the Pentateuch But these things are not the proper subject for our present handling II. There also was an Octatuech of the Prophets too q q q q q q Bava bathra fol. 14. 2. All the Books of the Prophets are eight Josuah Judges Samuel Kings Jeremy Ezekiel Isaiah and the twelve For the Historical Books also were read in their Synagogues under the notion of the Prophets as well as the Prophets themselves whose names are set down You will see the title prefixt to them in the Hebrew Bibles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former Prophets as well as to the others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the latter Prophets The Doctors give us the reason why they dispose the Prophets in that order that Jeremiah is named first Ezekiel next and Isaiah last which I have quoted in Notes upon Matth. XXVII 9. and let not the Reader think it irksome to repeat it here r r r r r r Bava bathra ubi supr Whereas the Book of Kings ends in destruction and the whole Book of Jeremy treats about destruction whereas Ezekiel begins with destruction and ends in consolation and whereas Isaiah is all in consolation they joyned destruction with destruction and consolation with consolation III. The third division of the Bible is intitled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Holy Writings And here also is found an Octateuch by some body as it seems though I know not where to
and fury of the Romans I beg your pardon for that saith Caiphas you know nothing neither consider for be he the Messiah or be he not it is expedient nay it is necessary he should dye rather than the whole Nation should perish c. VERS LI. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He Prophesied IS Caiphas among the Prophets There had not been a Prophet among the Chief Priests the Priests the People for these four hundred years and more and does Caiphas now begin to Prophesie It is a very foreign fetch that some would make when they would ascribe this gift to the office he then bore as if by being made High-Priest he became a Prophet The opinion is not worth confuting The Evangelist himself renders the reason when he tells us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Being the High-Priest that same year Which words direct the Reader 's eye rather to the year than to the High-Priest I. That was the year of pouring out the Spirit of Prophesie and Revelations beyond whatever the world had yet seen or would see again And why may not some drops of this great effusion light upon a wicked man as sometimes the Childrens crums fall from the table to the Dog under it that a witness might be given to the great work of Redemption from the mouth of our Redeemer's greatest enemy There lies the emphasis of the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that same year for Caiphas had been High-Priest some years before and did continue so for some years after II. To say the truth by all just calculation the office of the High-Priest ceased this very year and the High-Priest Prophesies while his office expires What difference was there as to the execution of the Priestly Office between the High-Priest and the rest of the Priesthood none certainly only in these two things 1. Asking counsel by Urim and Thummim 2. In performing the service upon the day of Expiation As to the former that had been useless many ages before because the Spirit of Prophesie had so perfectly departed from them So that there remained now no other distinction only that on the day of expiation the High-Priest was to perform the Service which an ordinary Priest was not warranted to do The principal ceremony of that day was that he should enter into the Holy of Holies with blood When therefore our great High-Priest should enter with his own blood into the Holiest of all what could there be left for this High-Priest to do When at the death of our great High-Priest the Veil that hung between the Holy and the Holy of Holies was rent in twain from the top to the bottom Math. XXVII 51. there was clear demonstration that all those Rites and Services were abolished and that the Office of the High-Priest which was distinguished from the other Priests only by those usages was now determined and brought to its full period The Pontificate therefore drawing its last breath prophesies concerning the Redemption of mankind by the great High-Priest and Bishop of Souls that he should dye for the people c. That of the Apostle Acts XXIII 5. I wist not that it was the High-Priest may perhaps have some such meaning as this in it I knew not that there was any High-Priest at all because the Office had become needless for some time For grant indeed that St. Paul did not know the face of Ananias nor that Ananias was the High-Priest yet he must needs know him to have been a Magistrate because he had his seat amongst the Fathers of the Sanhedrin now those words which he quoted out of the Law Thou shalt not speak evil of the Ruler of thy People forbad all indecent speeches toward any Magistrate as well as the High-Priest The Apostle therefore knowing Ananias well enough both who he was and that he sate there under a falsely assumed title of the High-Priest does on purpose call him whited wall because he only bore the colour of the High-Priesthood whenas the thing and office it self was now abolished Caiaphas in this passage before us speaketh partly as Caiaphas and partly as a Prophet As Caiaphas he does by an impious and precipitate boldness contrive and promote the death of Christ and what he uttered as a Prophet the Evangelist tells us he did it not of himself he spoke what himself understood not the depth of The greatest work of the Messiah according to the expectation of the Jews was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the reduction or gathering together the Captivities The High-Priest despairs that ever Jesus should he live could do this For all that he either did or taught seem'd to have a contrary tendency viz. to seduce the people from their Religion rather than recover them from their servile state of bondage So that he apprehended this one only remedy left that care might be taken so as by the death of this man the hazard of that Nations ruin might blow over If he be the Messiah which I almost think even Caiaphas himself did not much question since he can have no hope of redeeming the Nation let him die for it himself that it perish not upon his account Thus miserably are the great Masters of Wisdom deceiv'd in almost all their surmizes they expect the gathering together of the Children of God in one by the life of the Messiah which was to be accomplisht by his death They believe their Traditional Religion was the establishment of that Nation whereas it became its overthrow They think to secure themselves by the death of Christ when by that very death of his their expected security was chiefly shaken O blind and stupid madness VERS LV. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To purifie themselves R. f f f f f f Rosh hashanah fol. 16. 2. Isaac saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Every man is bound to purifie himself for the Feast Now there were several measures of time for purifying He that was unclean by the touch of a dead body he requir'd a whole weeks time that he might be sprinkled with the water of Purification mixt with the ashes of the red heifer burnt the third and the seventh day which ceremony we may see and laugh at in Parah cap. 3. Other purifyings were speedilier perform'd amongst others shaving themselves and washing their garments were accounted necessary and within the Laws of purifying g g g g g g Moed-katon fol. 13. 1. These shave themselves within the Feast he who cometh from an heathen Country or from captivity or from prison Also he who hath been excommunicated but now absolv'd by the wise men These same also wash their garments within the Feast It is suppos'd that these were detain'd by some necessity of affairs that they could not wash and be shav'd before the Feast for these things were of right to be perform'd before lest any should by any means approach polluted unto the celebration of this Feast but if by some necessity they were hinder'd from doing it before
that sit in the upper Gab in the mount of the Temple But we will not contend VERS XIV 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And it was c. THE preparation of the Passover that is of the Chagigah as we have already noted at Chap. XVIII 28. and more largely at Mark XIV 12. where also we took notice of the following passage 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 About the tenth hour VERS XX. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the Hebrew THAT is in the Chaldee Tongue or the Language of those Jews on the other side Euphrates as before at Chap. V. VERS XXII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What I have written I have written THIS was a common way of speaking amongst the Rabbins p p p p p p chetubb fol. 96. 1. A Widow if she take or occupy the moveables of her Husband deceased for her own maintenance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What she takes she takes i. e. that which she hath done stands good and the moveables go to her q q q q q q Menacoth fol. 3. 1. If any one shall say I bind my self to offer an oblation out of the Frying-pan and offers indeed something from a Gridiron and so on the contrary 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which he hath offered he hath offered That is and indeed it is frequently used amongst them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which is done and cannot be recalled r r r r r r Jevamoth fol. 106. 2. If the putting off the shooe of the Husbands Brother be before the spitting in his face or the spitting in his face before the putting off the shooe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which is done and it stands good Pilate doth almost act the Prophet as well as Caiphas That which I have written JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS I have written and it shall stand and obtain they shall have no other King Messiah than this for ever VERS XXIII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. They took his Garments and Coat c. BY the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Garments we are to understand all his Cloths excepting his Coat or upper Garment for which because it was without seam they cast lots Targumist upon Psal. XXII 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They cast lots upon my Sindon or linnen For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with him is Sindon or Linnen Prov. XXXI 24. That is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sindon as it is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Talith The upper Coat Matth. V. 40. He that will take thy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thy Coat or outward garment let him also have thy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 inward garment also VERS XXV 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There stood by the Cross c. * * * * * * Bava Meziah fol. 83. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He stood under the Cross or the Gallows and wept It is told of R. Eliezer ben R. Simeon who being very angry had commanded a Fuller to be hanged 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but his wrath abating and he coming to himself went after him to have freed him but could not for they had hanged the man before he came He therefore repeated that passage He that keepeth his lips and his tongue keepeth his soul from trouble He stood under the Gallows and wept c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mary of Cleophas That is Mary the Wife of Cleophas or Alpheus For I. Consult Mark XV. 40. There were also Women looking on afar off among whom was Mary Magdalene and Mary the Mother of James the less and Joses Now it is well enough known that Alpheus was the Father of James the less and of Joses Matth. X. 3. II. We very oftentimes meet with the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 amongst the Talmudists which in the reading may be turned either into Alphai or Cleophi s s s s s s Echah rabbathi fol. 79. 4. R. Berechiah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 t t t t t t Midâ—as Coheleth fol. 82. 4. R. Chaijah and R. Achah say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 u u u u u u Hieros Nazir sol 53. 3. R. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 askt R. Johanan x x x x x x Beresh rabb fol. 14. 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VERS XXVI 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Woman behold thy Son I. y y y y y y Maimon in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Widow is maintained by the goods of the heirs of him that is deceased so long as she remain a Widow till she receive her dower II. Joseph being deceased and Jesus now dying there were no heirs and probably no Goods or Estate for the support and maintenance of his Mother Mary This Christ at his last breath takes particular care of and probably had made provision before for it is hardly conceivable that this was the first overture he had with St. John in this affair but that had obtained a promise from him in his Mother's behalf some time before this And hence perhaps that peculiar love he bore to him beyond all the rest So that those words Woman behold thy Son and on the other side to him behold thy Mother seem no other than as if he had said This man from the time that thou art now deprived of thy Son shall be in the stead of a Son to thee and shall cherish and provide for thee and so vice versâ to his Disciple John VERS XXIX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There was set a Vessel full of Vinegar BUT was not this an unusual and uncustomary thing that there should be a Vessel filled with Vinegar should it not have been rather 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with Myrrhate Wine or Wine mingled with Myrrhe as it is Mark XV. 23. It seems evident from the other Evangelists that our Saviour had the proffer of something to drink at two several times I. Before he was nailed to the Cross Matth. XXVII 33 34. When they were come to a place called Golgotha they gave him Vinegar to drink mingled with gall Vers. 35. And they Crucified him It was the custom toward those that were condemned by the Sanhedrin they were wont to allow them a Cup but it was of Wine mingled with Myrrhe or Frankinsence that by drinking that their brains might intoxicate and themselves become the more insensible of their torments and less apprehensive of their death z z z z z z Sanhedr fol. 43. 1. When any one was leading out to Execution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they give them to drink a little Fankinsence in a cup of Wine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mark XV. 23. And they gave it for this reason as it immediately follows 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. that their understanding might be disordered It was a Narcotick draugt on purpose to disguise and stupifie the senses Wine mingled with Myrrhe saith Mark. Vinegar mingled with Gall saith Matthew
God the true Messias And the Jews that would not believe that no sign would serve to make them believe That indeed you 'l say gave assurance to all men that he was the Son of God the true Messias but how did that give assurance that there should be an universal Judgment and he the Judge Truly he that knows what the true Messias means needs no more proof and demonstration of that than his very Character He is heir of the World he is Prince and Saviour he is King in Sion he is set up above all Principality and power as the Scripture speaks these and divers other things of him and doth any man need more evidence of his being judge of all the World But our question is how that is inferred or argued from his Resurrection The Resurrection of Christ did beget and effectuate a double Resurrection for you have mention of a two fold Resurrection in Scripture First There is mention of the first Resurrection Rev. XX. 5. The Millenary not able to clear the notion whereof nor to spell out the meaning hath bewildred himself in those wild conceptions as he hath done The first Resurrection began and took place presently after our Saviours own Resurrection for it means no other than the raising the Heathen from their death in sin blindness and Idolatry to the life light and obedience of the Gospel And so the Apostle titles their estate writing to the Ephesians which had been some of them Ephes. II. 1. You hath he quickned who were dead in trespasses and sins And to that very tenor are those words of the Prophet Esay XXVI 19. Thy dead men shall live together with my dead body shall they arise The Gentiles to be raised from their spiritual death presently upon his raising from his bodily And who so shall well weigh those words of our Saviour Joh. V. 25. The hour is coming and now is when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God and they that hear shall live will clearly find them to mean nothing else So that the Resurrection of Christ had first influence and virtue to cause this spiritual Resurrection the Resurrection of souls the raising up of the Gentiles from the death of sin And whence it had this influence it is easie to read viz. because by his Resurrection he had conquered the Devil who had so long kept the poor Heathen under that spiritual death Will you have a Commentary upon that passage in Psal. CX 3. Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power First His Resurrection day of power Rom. I. 4. Then look into the story of the Acts of Apostles the history of the times next following his Resurrection You may wonder there to see people coming in by flocks and thousands to the acknowledgment and entertaining of the Gospel three thousand at one Sermon Chap. II. five thousand at another Chap. III. and further in that book in a little time the Gospel running through the World and imbraced and intertained of all Nations Oh! It was the day of his power and thy people shall be willing in day of thy power He had now Conquered Hell and Satan by his death and rising again whose captives those poor heathen had been two and twenty hundred years and now he said to the captives Go free and to the prisoners Go forth and so they did And upon the very like account his Resurrection hath influence to the causing and effectuating the general Resurrection at the last day For though it might be a little too long to hold that the wicked shall be raised by the very same virtue of Christs Resurrection that the godly shall yet it is not too large to hold that they shall be raised by some virtue of his Resurrection viz. as his Resurrection had conquered death and brought him to those articles that he must in time give up and restore all prisoners and dead that they may come and give account to him that conquered him I have the keys of the grave and death faith he in the Revelations he had wrung the keys out of the jaylors hand and opened the prison doors that the prisoners should come out when he calls Very observable to the purpose we are upon viz. that Christs Resurrection did assure that judgment and that he should be judge is that in Phil. II. 8. 9. He humbled himself and became obedient unto death even the death of the cross Wherefore also God hath highly exalted him Obedience was that debt that was to be paid to God Whereas much stress is laid upon the torments that Christ suffered it is very true that he suffered as much as I may say God could lay upon him short of his own wrath and as much as the Devil could withal his wrath but that was not the debt that was due and to be paid to God Wrath and torment and damnation was rather the debt that was to be paid to man But the debt was obedience For easie is it to observe how Satan had got the day of God as with reverence I may speak it when he had brought the chief creature of Gods creation and in him all mankind to disobey God and to be obedient to him and had carried it for ever had not an obedience been paid again to God that outvied that disobedience How might Satan triumph Man that is the darling creature to the Creator and that is set up Lord and Ruler of all Creatures and to whom even the Angels are appointed to be ministring Spirits I have brought this brave Gallant to forsake his Creator and to follow and obey me But forth steps this noble Champion of God and in the form of a servant incounters this triumpher and mauger all his spite and power and vexatiousness he pays God an obedience incomparably beyond the obedience that Adam should have paid incomparably outweighing the disobedience that Adam shewed He paid an obedience that should answer for the disobedience of all his people An obedience that should be a stock for all his people Nay he paid an obedience that outvied all the disobediences of all men and Devils For he paid an obedience that was infinite Now his Resurrection did demonstrate that he had made full payment or else Satan and Death might have kept him still in the grave their prison if a farthing had been yet unpaid Now he having by his Resurrection consummated the payment of so great obedience and vindicated the honour and quarrel of God against his enemies In all justice and equity the Lord exalted him above all that all should be subject and homagers to him and that he might take account and reward accordingly those that obey him and that obey him not And so the Lord hath appointed a day in which he will judge the World in righteousness by him whereof he hath given assurance unto all men in that he raised him from the dead And are you assured that there will be
not received it When we see a person in worse state than our selves we commonly look upon our selves as some body whereas we should look up to him that hath made the difference And do we see a poor miserable creature and look upon him with scorn And do we not rather think Might not God have made me as poor and miserable as this poor wretch He might have clothed me with rags as well as this poor beggar He might have made me as silly as this poor Ideot Down great heart and proud and learn to ascribe all the comforts and benefits thou hast above any other poor soul where it is due and to ascribe nothing to thy self but guilt and sinfulness If we desire to be esteemed what is it to be esteemed by God He hath set all at one II. rate as men are in the lump if we desire to be of a better value it is wisdom to labour to be so in his eyes that so values all To esteem our selves is but a folly to labour to have others esteem us is but folly unless it be in an estimation that God will say Amen to it also Remember that of the Apostle It is not he whom man approveth but whom God approveth If we would be thought to be beautiful let it shine in the image of God if rarely decked let it be with his ornaments if to be learned remember that He that honoureth me I will honour A SERMON Preached upon JUDGES XI 39. And it came to pass at the end of two months that she returned to her Father who did with her according to his vow which he had vowed THE Apostle in the Epistle to the Hebrews Chap. XI reckoning up that noble Catalogue of men famous for faith and great actions under the Law at vers 32. mentions three that may seem to be something questionable and those are Gedeon and Samson and Jephtha men indeed that had done great acts but that in the close came off with some foul blot Gedeon Judg. VIII 27. made an Ephod and put it in his own City Ophrah and all Israel went thither a whoring after it Samson pulled down the house upon his own head and so became Felo de se or guilty of his own death And was not Jephtha guilty of the death of his own daughter That is the question we are now to look into I have lately shewn you the Heathen sacrificing men and women to their Gods and Heathenish Israelites sacrificing their children unto Moloch let us now consider whether Jephtha a man of a better Name and Religion fell not under the like miscarriage in sacrificing of his Daughter The Text tells us He did to her according to his vow which he had vowed And the resolution of the question lies in the resolution of another verse what his Vow was That you have at vers 30 31. And Jephtha vowed a vow unto the Lord and said if thou shalt without fail deliver the children of Ammon into mine hands Then it shall be that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me when I come in peace from the children of Ammon shall surely be the Lords and I will offer it up for a burnt-offering A rash Vow as appears by his repenting and renting his garments vers 35. A rash Vow that he could not come off with either breaking or performing it but with sin If he performed it not he sinned in making a Vow that he might not perform If he performed it he sinned in performing a Vow that he might not make So that as the King of Syria once said Whether they came out for peace take them alive or whether they come for war take them alive So is Jephtha taken deadlily whether he hold his Vow or break it he is caught under a rash and sinful Vow as a man that hath a Wolf by the ears that whether he hold him or let him go he is in danger If he break his Vow how can he answer his taking such an ingagement upon him as not to keep If he hold it how can he answer making a Vow of so nice a performance The words of his Vow are read one way by some Interpreters and another way by others and there is one letter in the Hebrew Text breeds this diversity viz. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that may signifie either And or Or. And accordingly some read it Whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me when I return in peace shall surely be the Lords And I will offer it up for a burnt offering And others read it Or I will offer it up As meaning if it be fit to be offered in sacrifice I will offer it in sacrifice but if it be not fit yet it shall be the Lords So some of your Bibles give intimation of this diversity of reading having one in the Text and the other in the Margin But in the Text you see it is And I will offer it up And so it is in the Greek Vulgar Italian French and so rendred also from the Eastern Languages Now what could meet him out of the doors of his house that was fit for sacrifice Nothing to be expected to come out thence but Men Women and Dogs and any of these yea the very Dogs might come out to meet him and welcom home their Master but none of these were sit to be sacrificed Nay a Dog is not fit to be dedicated to God any way For though there is a supposal Levit. XXVII 11. and a permission of dedicating and sanctifying an unclean beast to the Lord that was not fit to be sacrificed and that it might be redeemed for a sum of mony to be given to the Priest yet a Dog is particularly excepted in that prohibition Deut. XXIII 18. Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore nor the price of a dog into the house of the Lord for any Vow And do ye think Jephtha had his dog in his thoughts when he made his Vow That were more ridculous to imagine And if any were so simple as to imagine it it might be answered He could not think of his dog because he knew a dog could not be so consecrate to God Could he then think of a Bullock Ram Lamb Kid or Goat These were things indeed that were fit to sacrifice but a double objection lies against thinking that he thought of any of these The one is because he speaks of coming out of the doors of his house which no one will understand but of his dwelling house And it were ridiculous to think of Ox or Ram or Lamb or Goat coming out of his dwelling house And the other is that he speaks of coming to meet him which expression means to welcom him home as his Daughter went out to meet him to welcom him home Now it can little be imagined that he thought of any Bullock or Lamb or Goat coming out to meet him under any such notion Therefore these
high when I say He suffered as much as God could put him to suffer and that I speak too low when I say short of his own wrath I dare not say He suffered the wrath of God as many do but the Prophets and Apostles teach me that he suffered the tryings of God And more he could not be put to suffer than what he did It pleased the Lord to bruise him and to put him to grief Esa. LIII 10. And more could not be laid upon him than what was laid Have you seriously weighed the meaning of those words of our Saviour himself Luke XXII 53. This is your hour and power of darkness The plain English of it is This is your hour that God hath let you loose upon me to do with me what you will without restraint And so hath he let loose upon me the Kingdom of darkness in its utmost power at the full length of the chain to do against me the utmost it can do I was daily with you in the Temple and ye stretched out no hands against me For then Providence restrained them because the Hour was not yet come But this is your hour and now Hell and all its power and all its Agents are let loose against him and Providence does not check them with any restraint I might insist to shew you that whereas God from the day of Adams fall had pitched a combate and field to be fought twixt the Serpent and the seed of the Woman in which the Serpent should bruise his heel and he break the Serpents head the hour of that incounter being now come the Godhead of Christ suspends its acting the providence of God suspends its restraining and lets Satan loose to do the utmost of his power and malice and leaves Christ to stand upon the strength of his own unconquerable holiness The Providence of God hath the Devil in a chain yea as to wicked and ungodly men Else why are they not carried bodily to Hell by him Why are they not hurried to their own place by him body and soul together But here God let the chain quite loose Satan do thy worst against him use all thy power rage and malice but all would not do for God very well knew what a Champion he had brought into the field to incounter him And therefore I may very well say it again That God put him to suffer as much as he could put him to suffer on this side his own wrath and the Devil put him to suffer as much as he could do with all his rage and power But his sufferings were not all that gave his blood and death that virtue that most justly is ascribed to it of justifying and saving The torments that he suffered were not the Godfather that named his blood by that precious Name of justifying and saving but it was that infinite Obedience that he shewed in bowing so low as to undergo those sufferings And there especially does the Scripture lay and lodge the stress of it Rom. V. 19. By the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Phil. II. 8. He humbled himself and became obedient unto death even the death of the Cross. Heb. V. 8. Though he were a son yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered Our Saviour in his sufferings and death for to that I will consine my discourse concerning his Obedience as the Text confines us to treat only of his blood and as the Scripture more peculiarly lodges his Obedience there For though he performed Obedience to God all his life yet the Obedience that he shewed to and in the shedding of his blood was the very apex and top-stone of his obedience And for this it is that I scruple to say that he suffered the wrath of God in his sufferings because it is hard to think that he lay under the depth of Gods displeasure when he was now in the highest pitch of obeying and pleasing God I say That Our Saviour in his sufferings and death had to deal with God and Satan upon different accounts with God to satisfie him with Satan to destroy him And with one and the same instrument as I may call it his Obedience he effected these contrary effects As the pillar of â—ire Exod. XIV was darknes to the Egyptians but light to Israel So his Obedience was destruction to the Devil and satisfaction to God I. Christ was to break the head of the Serpent as the Serpent had broke the head of Adam and all mankind He was to conquer the Devil who had conquered Man And what was that by which he conquered him By his divine power as he was God That had been no great Mastery for the great God by his omnipotent power to conquer a creature When he did but exert a little of his divine power at his apprehension he made Judas and all his band of Ruffians to go backward and fall to the ground Joh. XVIII 6. But he was to conquer Satan by righteousness holiness and obedience to God He had not needed to have been incarnate to conquer the Devil by his omnipotent divine power but he was to conquer him and he did conquer him by obedience and holiness Joh. XIV 30. The Prince of this World cometh saith he and hath nothing in me And he came with all his forces all his fury all his power and do all he could he could find nothing in him that could serve his turn All that he did or could do could not move him one hairs bredth from obeying God and persisting in his holiness The Apostle in the ninth of this Epistle vers 14. saith He offered himself without spot to God One spot had spoiled all the offering but the Devil could not fix one spot upon him though he flung against him all the sink of Hell but still he keeps to his obedience and holiness Vicisti Galilaee Julian a child of the Devil once said O Galilaean thou hast overcome me The Devil himself hath cause to say so now The Devil let loose upon him to do the utmost against him that he could without any restraint to bring him from his obeying of God and so to foil him and all will not do All the temptations and tricks and assaults that the anvil of Hell could forge and sharpen were bent and used against him and all return blunted and avail nothing All that Satan can do cannot bring from him one repining word for all his tortures not one desponding thought for all his pangs not one unbecoming passage for all his passion But still he will oby God come what will he will still retain his holiness and integrity let Devils and Men do what they will Satan art thou not conquered O Devil where is thy power now O Hell where is thy victory Thanks be given to God that hath given us such victory through Jesus Christ our Lord. Satan thou hast not the first Adam now in handling who was foiled by one Devil and in one
and the first temptation presented to him Now all the power and army of Hell is let loose all the machinations of the bottomless pit put in practise against the second Adam but all to no purpose he stands like a rock unmoved in his righteousness and obedience and by such a death destroys him that had the power over death the Devil II. As the Dâ—â—â—l must be conquered so God must be satisfied And as Christs obedience did the one work so it did the other Obedience was the debt of Adam and mankind and by disobedience they had forfeited their Bonds Then comes this great Undertaker and will satisfie the debt with full interest yea and measure heaped and running over Does not the Apostle speak thus much Rom. V. from vers 12. forward particularly at vers 19. By the disobedience of one man many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Nor was this all that mans debt must be paid but Gods honour lay at stake too and that must be vindicated God had created man his noblest creature that he might glorifie and honour his Creator by his obedience Satan brings him to disobey his Creator and to obey him How might Satan here triumph and the honour of God lie in the dust I have mastered the chief Creation of God might Satan boast and made him that carried the badge and livery of his image now to carry mine I have frustrated the end and honour of the Creator and now all is mine own How sad a time were those three hours or thereabouts that passed betwixt the Fall of Adam and the promise of Christ Adam in darkness and not the least glimpse of promise or comfort Satan triumphing and poor manking and Gods honour trampled underfoot But then the Sun of righteousness arose in the promise that the seed of the woman should break the head of the Serpent And shall this uncircumcised Philistin thus deâ—ie the honour and armies of the living God saith Christ shall Satan thus carry the day against man and against God I will pay obedience that shall fully satisfie to the vindication of Gods honour to confound Satan and to the payment of mans debt to his reinstating and recovery And that was it that he paid consummatively in his Obedience to the death and in it and to the shedding of his blood Of which to speak in the full dimensions of the height depth length bredth of it what tongue can suffice what time can serve T is a Theme the glorified Saints deservedly sing of to all Eternity I shall speak in little of that which can never be extolled enough these two things only I. That he died merely out of obedience The Apostle tells us in Phil. II. 8. He became obedient to the death the death of the Cross. And what can ye name that brought him thither but Obedience Christs dead body imagine lies before you Call together a whole College of Phisitians to diffect it and to tell you what it was of which he died And their Verdict will be Of nothing but Love to man and Obedience to God For Principles of death he had none in his nature And the reason of his death lay not in any mortality of his body as it does in ourâ— but in the willingness of his mind Nor was his death his wages of sin as it is ours Rom. VI. ult but it was his choise and delight Luke XII 50. I have a baptism to be baptised withal and how am I straitned till it be accomplished Ask the first Adam why he sinned when he had no principles of sin in him and the true answer must be Because he would sin And so ask the second Adam why he died when he had no principles of death in him his answer must be to the like tenor He would lay down his life because he would be obedient to the death He came purposely into the World that he might dye Behold I tell you a mystery Christ came purposely into the World that he might dye and so never did Man but himself never will man do but himself True that every Man that comes into the World must dye but never Man came purposely that he might dye but only He. And he saith no less than that he did so Joh. XII 27. Father save me from this hour but for this cause came I to this hour And John XVIII 37. For this cause came I into this World to bear witness to the Truth Even to bear witness to the Truth to Death and Martyrdom II. Now add to all this the dignity of his Person who performed this Obedience that he was God as well as Man That as he offered himself according to his Manhood so he offered himself by the Eternal Spirit or as he was God as this Apostle saith Chap. IX 14. And now his obedience his holiness that he shewed in his death is infinite And what need we say more So that lay all the disobedience of all men in the World on an heap as the dead frogs in Egypt were laid on heaps that they made the land to stink again yet here is an Obedience that out-vies them all For though they be infinite in number as to mans numbring yet lay them all together they are finite upon this account because committed by creatures finite But here is an Obedience a holiness paid down by him that is infinite And now Satan where is thy Triumph Thou broughtest the first Adam to fail of perfect Obedience that he should have paid his Creator and here the second Adam hath paid him for it infinite Obedience And what hast thou now gained Therefore to take account from whence comes that infinite Virtue of Christs blood and death that the Scripture so much and so deservedly extols and magnifies Because as the Evangelist â—aith Out of his side came water and blood so out of his wounds came obedience and blood holiness and blood righteousness and blood and that obedience holiness righteousness infinite because he that paid it down and performed it was infinite And now judge whether it may not very properly be said That Christ was sanctified by his own blood As Aaron was sanctified for his Priesthood by his Unction and Garments Christ was consecrated fitted capacitated by his infinite obedience and righteousness which he shewed to the death and in it to be an High Priest able to save to the uttermost all those that come to him For first as in reference to himself it is said by this Apostle that he was raised from the dead by the blood of the Covenant Chap. XIII 20. And it was not possible but he should be raised for when he had performed such obedience and righteousness as in it was infinite in its validity subdued Satan in its alsufficiency satisfied the justice of God it was impossible that he should be held of death which is the wages of sin and disobedience And as he was thus raised by
the virtue of his blood i. e. of his obedience and righteousness so see what the same Apostle saith of his Exaltation Phil. II. 8 c. And being found in fashion as a man he humbled himself and became obedient unto death even the death of the Cross. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him and given him a Name which is above every Name That at the Name of JESUS every knee should bow c. And think here Christian what a stock of obedience and righteousness here is for thee to answer and satisfie for thy disobedience and unrighteousness if thou become a child of the Covenant as this blood was the blood of the Covenant It is said in Dan. IX 26. That Messiah should be cut off but not for himself This blood of the New Testament was not shed for himself but for many And here is enough for every soul that comes to him be they never so many Like the Widdows oyl in the Book of the Kings there is enough and enough again as long as any Vessel is brought to receive it And this may direct us toward the forming of the reliance of our Faith upon the blood of Christ the great work that a Christian hath to do for his Justification and Salvation Which will be the more cleared to us by considering how his blood is the blood of the Covenant Which is the next thing we should speak to had we time to do it A SERMON PREACHED UPON HEBREWS XIII 10. We have an Altar whereof they have no right to eat which serve the Tabernacle THERE is one that asks our Saviour Good Master what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life Mat. XIX 16. And another that asks his great Apostle What must I do to be saved Act. XVI 30. The questions mean one and the same thing but only proposed in different expressions And the answers tend to one and the same purpose though proposed in terms very different Our Saviour answers If thou wilt enter into life keep the Commandments The Apostle answers If thou wilt be saved believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. The one proposeth Faith the other proposeth Good works not in such contrariety as the Apostle James speaks of Faith and Works Chap. III. but in such consonancy as that the one is subservient unto the other keeping of the Commandments towards the bringing on of Faith and Faith to the breeding and forwarding the keeping of the Commandments and both to obtain eternal life I will speak at present of the absolute necessity of Faith for the obtaining eternal life and therefore have I chosen these words which I have read to you which seem at first sight to be meer strangers to such a subject but when explained and rightly understood are very pertinent to such a matter I say rightly understood for there are many the Popish Expositors especially that understand them exceedingly wrong and as far from the Apostles meaning as likely can be By we have a Altar they understand the Altar in their Churches viz. the Table where they administer the Sacrament and thence they call the Sacrament The Sacrament of the Altar A title that hath been too common in England and which hath cost many a good man very dear The Lord grant the title be never known here any more But the title of the Altar is commonly known among us still and ask many why they call it an Altar they will be ready to produce this place of the Apostle We have an Altar As if the Apostle who had been crying down the service and sacrifices of the Altar all along this Epistle and shewed that they were but shadows and to vanish when the substance appeared should set them up again and build up anew what he had so earnestly set himself to destroy As if Gedeon that destroyed the Altar of Baal in the night should fall awork in the morning and build it up again But the Altar in the Apostles meaning here is Christ himself And as he had called him an High Priest and a Sacrifice along in the Epistle before so he calls him also the Altar here shewing that all those things did but represent him and that he was the substance and reality of those shadows He shews how he was the Great High Priest in the later end of the fourth and along the fifth Chapter He shews how he was the great Sacrifice in the ninth and tenth Chapters and how he was the great Altar he shews at this place We have an Altar And that he means Christ by the Altar is apparent by two things that follow to omit more that might be collected by the context The first is in the words immediately following For those beasts whose blood was brought by the High Priest into the holy place for sin their bodies were burnt without the Camp Therefore Jesus also that he might sanctifie the people with his own blood suffered without the gate His argumentation is this The great solemn Sacrifice for sin on the day of attonement was not burnt upon the Altar in the Temple but was burnt without the City so Christ was sacrificed without the gate so that whosoever will partake of that true Sacrifice for sin must go to the Altar there and not to the Altar within the Temple And in the next verse but one he shews yet more plainly that he means Christ by our Altar ver 13. Therefore by him let us offer the sacrifice of praise continually to God As on the Altar in the Temple they offered their Sacrifices and Thank-offerings so by him as on our Altar Let us offer our sacrifice of praise to God So that in the words you have an Affirmative assertion and a Negative The Affirmative That we have Christ for our Altar The Negative That they that serve the Tabernacle have no right to eat of this Altar The Affirmative comfortable to every true Christian the later seems comfortless for every true Jew The reason of the Negative assertion we may inquire more particularly into afterwards To the former to speak at present we take up this Observation from it That he that will offer any sacrifice acceptable to God must go to Christ as the true Altar on which to offer it No sacrifice among the Israelites could be accepted if it were not offered on the Temple-altar And it was Gods special command Thou shalt not offer thy sacrifice in any of thy Cities but shalt go to the Altar of the Lord thy God in the place which he shall chuse Nor can any sacrifice be acceptable to God of any Christian but what is offered to him upon the Altar of his appointment the Lord Christ where alone is attonement for sinners As Priesthood and Sacrifice were typical and signified to this purpose so also was the Altar of the same signification And whereas there were two Altars at the Temple one for Sacrifice the other for Incense they did both but represent Christ and his acting
will become of thee when those thy Treasures those thy Teachers are no more Why naught become of them For presently after the death of those Prophets and the departure of the Spirit of Prophesie the Nation parted into two deadly heresies viz. The Pharisees teaching for Doctrines the Commandments of men Mat. XV. And the Sadducees teaching for doctrines the very dictates of Devils That there is no resurrection nor Angel nor Spirit nor world to come The first thing that I observe hence is That two such different Parties should be in the Nation together should sit as they do here in council together So great a difference betwixt the parties and a continual contestation about that difference and yet both parties admitted to be in the Church to bear office in the Church and to sit Judges in the great Council There were Sadducee-Priests as well as Pharisee And the Jews Records have a story of a Sudducee-Priest that was to offer the drink offering upon the Altar at the Feast of Tabernacles and because he missed something of doing exactly as he should have done all the Company present fell a pelting him with Pomecitrons which every one used to carry at the Feast And there were Sadducee Magistrates and Judges as well as Pharisee And the Jews Records do give us notice that there was once a time that the great Council at Jerusalem consisted almost all of Sadducees if not altogether In reading of the Context at your leisure you will see that in that great Council now as Paul stands before it there were not a few Sadduces as well as there were divers of the other Sect. And what toleration there was of a dissenting Party in that Church is worth the considering of those that have to dispute about that Case Another Gloss that I should make upon both these opinions should be this question II. Was it possible that a Sadducee and a Pharisee should be saved Some will maintain that a man may be saved in any Religion in any opinion so that he live honestly toward men and devoutly towards God Whereas a man may take up an opinion and belief which may put such a bar against his salvation as to make it impossible for him to be saved let him live never so honestly For it is not bare civil honesty nor blind devotion will bring to Heaven Let a Sudducee live never so honestly never so devoutly was it not utterly impossible for him to be saved while he held the opinions that he did which were directly against Salvation And a Pharisee while he made it the great Article of his Faith that he could be justified and saved by his own works put a bar against all possibility of his justification and salvation Men think it a small thing to be medling with this or that new strange opinion or should I not say they think it a great thing a brave matter to invent and vent some new opinion or other when that very thing and opinion may be the very lock and key and bar to keep them out of Heaven Instance and example of such opinions might be given in men of several professions and religions in too great plenty But we will look more particularly on this before us The Sadducees say there is no resurrection neither Angel nor Spirit The Sadducees here are marked for their Heretical opinions about some main Articles of Faith and it gives us occasion I. To observe that they denyed such Articles II. To consider the Articles they denyed As to the First we may first remember that saying of the Apostle 1 Cor. XI 19. For I. there must be heresies among you that they that are approved may be made manifest among you That is a sad accent there must be heresies And whence comes that must be or that necessity Hath God any hand in it that it must be because he will have it Or is there any such necessity that it must be because the Church hath need of Heresies There must be weeds in the garden Is it because the garden hath need of weeds It hath need of weeding rather than of weeds But the must be proceedeth from the corruption of men of evil minds that will raise up heresies And it cannot be otherwise while their minds are and will be so evil That we may take some view of this unhappy necessity proceeding from such an unhappy cause let us gradually observe these things I. That God gives forth his word and truth to men authoritatively that men should beleive them at their peril He sends forth his word not to go a begging for belief of it and obedience to it but let men disbelive and disobey it at their peril Ezek. I. Whether they will hear or whether they will forbear yet shall they know that there hath been a Prophet among them And let them answer it according as they have recieved him II. Now the causes of mens not believing the World and not obeying the truth are in themselves and not at all in God He that gave his word to be believed and obeyed would not be the cause that it should not be believed nor obeyed It is the wickedness of mens own hearts that causeth it and it is the voluntary doing of their hearts not to obey it It is said Joh. XII They could not believe but the first cause was because they would not believe And so by the continual practise of not willing to believe they came to the fatal distemper that they could not believe The Prophet Esa. Chap. LIII cryeth out Who hath believed our report Why no body And what is the reason Was not the word worth believing Or could they say they could not believe it The truth was they had no mind to it They had a mind against it They in Jeremy Chap. XLII deal plainly and speak out We will not hear the word of the Lord which thou hast spoken to us And what was their reason They had no mind to it because it was not to their mind Now had they been disputed with and questioned Do you not think that God is wiser than you Are not his Councils better than your Councils and the words of his mouth more to be valued than the suggestions of your hearts What answer do they make Be it what it will we will have our own minds This is the cause of the must be because men will have it so and no perswasion to the contrary can prevail with them We have the mind of Christ is the Apostles rejoycing but we will have our own minds is the worlds language and practice And upon this mad wilfulness it is that there must be Heresies III. Now it is too tedious to enquire into all the immediate causes and originals of Heresies they are so many The Father of them was an Amorite and the Mother an Hittite the whole breed a Canaanite a cursed generation a monstrous generation bred very oft of clean contraries bred ever of
Spirit had glossed upon the words of the whole Sanhedrin in vers 47 48. What do we For this man doth many miracles If we let him thus alone all men will believe on him and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and Nation If they grant he did so many miracles why were they afraid that men should believe on him Why did they not believe on him themselves And afraid the Romans should destroy their City and Nation if he were believed in Whereas their destruction was because they did not believe in him Truly Caiaphas said but truly of them though he aimed it at another sense Ye know nothing neither do ye consider No nor thou O Caiaphas neither For had they known they would not have crucified the Lord of life had they considered they had not brought that guilt upon themselves and the City that they did But in what sense he makes them so senseless is somewhat obscure Ye know not neither consider that it is expedient for us that one man should dye for the people and that the whole Nation perish not That they knew as well as himself that any States-man any reasonable man might know well enough that it was better to put to death a ring-leader of mischief as they took Christ to be than that a whole Nation perish That old Maxim in Politicks and reason Pereat unus potius quam unitas would easily be observed by less States-men than they And the one that they would have to dye they all agreed in but herein Caiaphas resolution seems to have out-vied theirs namely that whereas they were afraid to take Christ off for fear of the multitude he blusters through that doubt and scruple and would have it resolved that he must dye and be taken away So that in those words of his you may observe him speaking as a Caiaphas and as a Prophet As a wretched Caiaphas counselling the Sanhedrin not to fear or boggle at the business but resolve on it for it is expedient he should dye And as a Prophet or one inspired signifying that it was necessary Christ should dye for the preservation of that Nation that it should not perish namely those that believed in him and so for the preserving of all in other Nations that should also believe The former he spake and meant with all his heart to stir up the Bench to destroy Christ for all the danger of the multitude But this later he spake indeed but meant it not neither understood what he spake and therefore the Text tells us This he spake not of himself but being High Priest c. There had not been a High Priest a Prophet among the Nation for above four hundred years before and must Caiaphas now become a Prophet Nay the Jews tell us and they tell us truly that there had not been any Prophet at all in the Nation of so long a time and it is wonder God should now inspire such a wretch as Caiaphas They tell us that upon the death of Haggai Zechariah and Malachi those last Prophets the spirit of Prophesie left Israel departed and was no more In which they spoke just as Caiaphas does here very truly and very maliciously very maliciously because they would exclude the Apostles and Disciples of Christ from having the Prophetick spirit but withal very truly as to the space between the death of those last Prophets and the appearing of Christ and his Apostles There was not a man endued with the spirit of Prophesie in all that space of time nay not a man that did pretend to the spirit of Prophesie in all that time It is observable that about the coming of Christ many arose pretending themselves to be Christ or to be Prophets but ye find not that any from the death of Malachi had done so before And the reason was because the Prophet Daniel had so exactly pointed out the time of Christs coming that the Nation knew the time and expected it and when it came such Deluders then start up with such pretences because they knew there would be then a brave change of times But till that came they lay still convinced that the Spirit was departed and should not be restored till Messias coming What I speak there is clear proof for in the New Testament That they knew when Messias should appear is plain by these words Luke XIX 11. He added and spake a parable because he was nigh to Jerusalem and because they thought the Kingdom of God should immediately appear And by that concourse of all the Nation out of all Nations to Jerusalem Act. II. 5. being instructed by Daniel in his ninth Chapter of the compleat time of Messias sealing Vision and Prophesie and bringing in everlasting righteousness which he had pointed out to the very hour And that they were convinced of the departure of the Holy Ghost not to be restored till the coming of Messias appears plainly by the answer of those Jews at Ephesus Act. XIX 2. Paul said unto them have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed And they said unto him We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost Not that they doubted at all of the being of the Holy Ghost but that they had learned with the whole Nation that the Holy Ghost was departed upon the death of those Prophets and they had never yet heard that he was restored The Jews say again that from that time there was no Urim and Thummim with the High Priest under the second Temple And there is confirmation for it in Nehem. VII 65. And the Tirshatha said unto them that they should not eat of the most holy things till there stood up a Priest with Urim and Thummim And the reason of its ceasing was because Prophesie was ceased For the Oracle by Urim as I once shewed you was given by the Priest being inspired and prophesying Now after all the long ceasing of Phrophesying in the Nation and of Prophesying among the Priest-hood for a Caiaphas to stand up a Prophesier seems something strange and what shall we say to it The Rhemists will resolve you the scruple with a wet finger if you will but believe them Will you give me leave to give you their Gloss upon the place Marvel not say they that Christ preserveth his truth in the Church as well by the unworthy as the worthy Prelates thereof the gift of the Holy Ghost following their order and office as we see here in Caiaphas and not their merits and person And they conclude How may we then be assured that Christ will not leave Peters seat though the persons that â—ecupy the same were as ill as the blasphemous and malicious mouths of Hereticks do affirm The assertion false and the inference ridiculous The assertion that Caiaphas prophesied by virtue of the order of his Priesthood being most false For none of that order had prophesied of four hundred years before And the Inference ridiculous And it
proves in the end to be but a curse as I have shewed before and they have the longer score to answer for the greater heaps of sin to be arraigned upon the sadder account of so much time mispent But for Answer to this as I said before There is no temporal thing which in it self is a blessing but wicked men by abuse of it make it a curse They make their Table a snare their wealth a trap their long life a curse And it is no wonder if they do so by these things for they make Divine Ordinances which in themselves are a savour of life to become to them the savour of death nay Christ himself to become a stumbling block and their ruine Now the goodness or blessing in things is not to be judged of by such mens using but by what they are in their own nature As thousands in Hell curse the time that ever they lived so thousands in Heaven bless God for ever that ever they lived here so long Long life to the one party was balm the other made it poison There is another Objection That long life to many proves but long misery therefore is not such a promise and blessing Such are the miseries of this life even to them that spend their time the best that Solomon tells us Eccles. VII 1. That the day of death is better than the day of birth And Chap. IV. 2 3. I praised the dead which are already dead more than the living which are yet alive Yea better is he than both that hath not yet been which hath not seen the evil which is done under the Sun And how many of the Saints of God that have spent their lives as well as ever men did as ever men could spend their lives yet because of the miseries of life have desired that their lives might be cut off and that they might live no longer How oft is this Job's mournful tune over and over Chap. VI. 8 9. O that I might have my request and that God would grant me the thing I long for Even that it would please God to destroy me and that he would loose his hand and cut me off And Chap. VII 15 16. My soul chooseth strangling and death rather than my life I loath it I would not live always And so alomst in every one of his speeches And the same tune is Elias at 1 King XIX 4. It is enough now O Lord take away my life for I am no better than my Fathers And Jeremy sings the same doleful ditty when he curseth the day of his birth Chap. XX. 14. How is long life then a blessing when the sorrows of it make men so weary of it I Answer This were true indeed if the blessing of long life consisted only in enjoying earthly prosperity and then the Children of God were of all men most miserable For they have the least earthly prosperity But the blessing of long life consists in things of another nature For those holy mens desiring because of their afflictions here to have their lives cut off 1. We neither wronged them nor Religion should we say it was an humane frailty and failing in them But 2. It was not so much for that they undervalued the prolonging of their lives and the blessing in having life prolonged as that they placed not their blessedness in living here but were assured and longed after a better life Not one of them was unwilling to live but because he was very well prepared to dye therefore he wished for death rather And now that we may come to consider wherein the blessing of long life consisteth let us a little take up some places and passages of Scripture and some arguments in reason that declare and proclaim it as of it self to be a blessing 1. Prov. III. 16. Solomon urging men to espouse and marry Wisdom tells what Portion and Dower they shall have that get her Length of days is in her right hand and in her left riches and honour Observe that he accounts length of days a right hand Dower and riches and honour but a left hand one And indeed what are riches and honour if a man have not length of days to enjoy And the same Solomon commending old age saith Prov. XVI 31. It is a Crown of glory or a glorious Crown if the long life that brought it up thither have been spent as it should I might heap up many such passages but these suffice II. Consider that it is threatned for a curse and punishment that the bloody and deceitful man shall not live out half his days Psal. LV. 23. That the men of Eli's House should dye in their prime 1 Sam. II. 31. But I will name but one for all how oft threatned such and such shall be cut off I need not to cite places the Books of the Law are full of such expressions shall be cut off from his people from the congregation c. Which some understand of Excommunication but it means cutting off by the hand of God by some untimely or fatal death or shortning of life It is threatned as a curse that his days shall not be prolonged but cut off III. Ye have holy men in Scripture praying for prolonging of their lives and that upon this warrant that God promised long life as a blessing Psal. XXI 4. He asked life of thee and thou gavest it him even length of days for ever and ever And Psal. XXXIX ult O spare me that I may recover strength And Psal. CII 24. I said O my God take me not away in the midst of my days And so in the case of Ezekiah how bitterly did he take the tidings of the cutting off of his days Whether it were that it went sadly with him to dye of the Plague or that he saw not Jerusalem delivered from Sennacherib yet certainly it cost some tears to think he was to be taken away even in his prime and his life prolonged no further IV. To this may be added that God promised it for a peculiar blessing Thou shalt come to thy grave in a good old age Job V. 26. And how feeling a promise is that Zech. VIII 4. Thus saith the Lord of Hosts There shall yet old Men and old Women dwell in the streets of Jerusalem and every man with his staff in his hand for every age Methinks I see the streets full of such venerable heads and gravity every one crowned with gray hairs and old age a crown of blessing But what need I arguments to prove this What one thing is there in the world that hath more votes and voices than this For who is there that desires not to live long and see many days And skin for skin and all that he hath will he give for his life that it may be prolonged And who but will be contented to part with any earthly blessing so his life may be preserved Now wherein it is that long life is a blessing is best observed
conquer Hell then If he did what was it with What did his Soul there to conquer Hell How he conquered Hell and Death by dying and rising we can tell but how his Soul conquered with bare going thither who can tell you Or did he augment the torments of the Devils and damned That needed not nor indeed could it be done as I shall shew afterwards What then did Christs Soul there in its Triumph unless as He Veni vidi vici I came I saw I overcame it conquered Hell by looking into it Natura nihil facit frustra Nature does nothing in vain much less the God of nature And Christ in his life time never did spoke thought any thing in vain And it is unhansom to think that his Soul after death should go out of the bosom of his Father into Hell to do no body can imagine what For who can tell what it did in Triumphing there II. Was not Christ under his Humiliation till his Resurrection Was he not under it whilst he lay in the grave He himself accounts it so Psal. XVI 10. Thou wilt not suffer my Soul being in the state of separation my Body to see corruption to be trampled on by death to be triumphed over by Satan that yet had it there If you imagine his Soul triumphing or vapouring in Hell for I cannot imagine what it should do there unless to vapour how might Satan vapour again Thou Soul of Jesus dost thou come to triumph here Of what I pray thee Have I not cause to triumph over thee Have I not procured his death Banished thee out of his body and got it into the grave And dost thou come to triumph here Let us first see whether he can get out from among the dead before we talk of his triumph over him that had the power of death So that if we should yield to so needless a point as Christs going to triumph in Hell yet certainly it would be but very unseasonable to have gone thither when he had not yet conquered but his body was still under death and as yet under the conquest of Satan This had been to triumph before Victory as Benhadads vapour was to Ahab when he received that answer Let not him that girdeth on his sword boast himself as he that putteth it off The beginning of Christs Kingdom was his Resurrection for then had he conquered death and him that had the power of death the Devil And so the Scripture generally states it I need cite no proof but two of his own speeches Matth. XXVI 29. I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the Vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Fathers Kingdom that is after my Resurrection when I have conquered the Enemies of God and set up his Kingdom And Matth. XXVIII 18. And Jesus came and spake unto them saying All power is given unto me in Heaven and in Earth And this was after his Resurrection But is it not improper to dream of a Triumph before a Conquest That Christ should Triumph as King before he had put on his Kingdom As Esth. V. 3. On the third day she put on the Kingdom For so it is in the Hebrew The days before she had been under fasting mourning humiliation and that was not a time of Royalty and Triumph So on the third day Christ rose and put on his Kingdom the days before he had been under death had abased himself a very unfit and unseasonable time for his Soul to go and triumph III. As concerning Christs triumphing over Devils His Victory over Satan was of another kind of nature than to go amongst them to shew terribly or speak terribly for what else can we imagine his Soul did in that Triumph in Hell It is said Heb. II. 14. That through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the Devil Destroy him How We may say of him as he of the Traitor Vivit etiam in Senatum venit He lives yea he comes into the Council-house So Is the Devil destroyed He is alive walketh rageth ruleth He walked about the Earth before Christs death Job I. So hath he done ever since 1 Pet. V. 8. Your adversary the Devil as a roaring Lion walketh about seeking whom he may devour He was a murtherer from the beginning to Christs death Joh. VIII 44. So hath he been ever since he goes about seeking to devour and he doth devour He wrought in the children of disobedience before and he now worketh Eph. II. 2. And how hath Christ conquered destroyed him You must look for the Conquest and Triumph of Christ over him not so much in destroying his Person as destroying his Works 1 Joh. III. 8. For this purpose the son of God was manifested that he might destroy the works of the Devil I might here speak of many things I shall only mention two or three particulars wherein the Victory of Christ over the Devil by his death doth consist 1. By his death he hath conquered the very clamors of Satan paying a ransom for all his people Rom. VIII 33. Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect Satan is ready to say I lay a charge and claim to them for they have been disobedient But Christ hath paid a satisfaction for all their disobedience Satan thou art cast in thy suit the debt is paid How is the Devil confounded at the loss of such a prize as he expected And how does the Death and Merits of Christ here Triumph Now Goliah David defies thee touch one in the Camp of Israel if you can or dare they are all redeemed and ransomed thou hast nothing to do with them And the ransomed of the Lord shall go to Sion with everlasting joy Rejoyce O Heathens for the false accuser is cast out Here is a glorious Triumph by the righteousness and holiness of Christ delivering all his people 2. By his death he brake the partition wall and brings in the Heathen Oh! how did Satan hold them in slavery Pharaoh let my people go No. I know not the Lord nor will I let them go But thou shalt be brought to it and by the death of a Paschal Lamb they shall go whether thou wilt or no. Two thousand years had they been in his slavery sure thought he this shall be for ever But by the death of poor despised Jesus at Jerusalem the prison doors are open and all these captives are gone free Rejoyce ye prisoners of hope as they are called Zech. IX 11 12. I cannot but think of the case of Paul and Silas Act. XVI in an inner prison their feet in the stocks the doors fast and a strong guard and there comes one shake and all fly open and all the prisoners are loosed Jaylor what sayest thou now Thou mayst even draw thy sword and end thy self all thy prisoners are gone 3. Nay yet further Jaylor thou must to prison thy self Ponder on those words Rev. XX. 1
be under the torments of Hell And the Captain of our Salvation to be under the condition of the damned Let it not be told in Gath publish it not in the Streets of Ascalon Let not the Jews hear it nor the Turks understand such a thing lest they blaspheme our Lord of life more than they do The colour which is put upon this opinion by them that hold it is because Christ upon the Cross bare the sins of men and therefore that he was to bear the wrath torments and damnation that man had deserved And for this they produce those places Esa. LIII 6. The Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all 1 Pet. II. 24. Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree And they would have Christ to mean no less when he cried out Eli Eli Lamasabachtani my God my God why hast thou forsaken me For the stating of this matter I lay down these two things I. That it was impossible Christ should suffer the wrath of God the torments of Hell and be in the case of the damned for any cause of his own II. That he did not could not suffer these though he bare the sins of all his people I shall speak to both these under these five observations I. In all the passages of Christ at his suffering you cannot find that he looks upon God as an angry God Begin at his prayer at his last supper Joh. XVII Can you find there even the least hint that he doubted of Gods favour to him It is the rule of the Apostle 1 Tim. II. 8. That we lift up holy hands without wrath and doubting Can we think that Christ ever prayed with doubting Especially look into that Prayer and there is not the least tincture of it vers 1. Father glorifie thy Son Did his heart then any whit suspect that God was angry at him Vers. 2. Thou hast given him power over all flesh that he should give eternal life Are these the words of one that suspected he could come under the heaviest wrath of God Vers. 4. I have glorified thee on Earth I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do Are these the words of one that thought he could ever be repayed for so doing with wrath and vengeance and the torments of Hell Vers. 5. And now O Father glorifie me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the World was Vers. 13. And now Father I come unto thee Vers. 21. Thou Father art in me and I in thee Vers. 24. Father I will that they also whom thou hast given me be with me where I am that they may behold my glory Had Christ when he spake these things any suspicion or thought that he could possibly come under the heavy wrath of God It is said Chap. XVIII 1. He went beyond Kidron There he is in his agony then he prays Let this cup pass from me Why What did he see in the Cup Bitterness enough but not one drop of the dregs of Gods wrath Guess his case by the case of sinful men A Stephen a Cranmer a Ridley a Martyr is brought to the Stake He hath a Cup put into his hand and that very bitter but doth he see any of Gods wrath in it Martyrs could not have gone so joyfully to death had they seen God angry in that bitter dispensation Christ could not have gone so readily to his sufferings had he thought he had gone to encounter Gods indignation Look at his words on the Cross Hodie mecum in Paradiso To day shalt thou be with me in Paradise Were these the words of one under the torments of Hell to assure the thief of Heaven Pater in manus tuas Father into thy hands I commend my Spirit Did he apprehend God angry as at the Damned when he spake these words Nay those words Eli Eli Lamasabachtani speak not that he felt the wrath of God but a bitter providence that God had left him to such wrackings and tortures and to such wicked hands So that look at Christs passages at and near his Passion and you find not one word or action that doth bewray that Christ felt himself any whit at all under Gods fury Nay look through the Scripture whatsoever is spoken of Christ it sets him far from being to be thought liable to the wrath of God Was Christ a child of wrath as well as others Scripture tells you no. Esa. XLII 1. Behold my servant whom I uphold mine elect in whom my Soul delighteth I have put my Spirit upon him How far is that from such language as this Behold Christ under my wrath behold him under the torments of Hell And so that passage Matth. III. ult Lo a Voice from Heaven saying This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased And at his Transfiguration In whom I am well pleased And does he ever come to be angry at him as at the Damned and to lay his fury on him as on the tormented in Hell It troubles me to think any Christian should hold such an opinion concerning our Saviour and indeed where there is little need to imagine such a thing Could not Christ have wrought Redemption without enduring such heavy wrath then it were not so improper to conceive so But II. Christ in the work of Redemption had not to deal with the wrath of God but the justice of God not with his wrath to bear it but with his justice to satisfie it There is a great deal of difference may be made twixt wrath and justice and twixt satisfying one and the other A Judge condemning a Malefactor weeps and grieves Is there any wrath No but only justice The Malefactor satisfies the justice of the Law no wrath stirring Consider what was the debt men ought to God What owest thou to my Master It will be said Damnation and suffering eternal torments True these were due to them but the debt was of another nature viz. Obedience Damnation was the penalty upon forfeiture of Bonds but the Debt was Obedience that which man ought to God before he became sinful which he owes to God as he is God and which the Law challengeth and which the Gospel does also Does man owe Damnation to God as he is God as he is Creator as he is Lawgiver Or as man is man No God rather owes and will pay Damnation to man for being sinful Therefore that which Christ was properly to pay for his people was that which was properly their debt which they could not pay viz. Obedience And that the Scripture harps upon Rom. V. 19. As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Phil. II. 8. He became obedient unto Death Now what was Christ obedient to To say To the wrath of God were hardly sense but To the will of God which would prove and try him and could do it thorowly without wrath It was