Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n bear_v die_v sin_n 6,507 5 5.1003 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A96265 A discovery, and confutation of the opinions, and practises of some false brethren, betwixt Bridge, and Lincolne: shewing how they agree in their opinions, with Pelagians; Papists; Arminians; in their practises, with Anabaptists. Wherein univerall redemption is confuted; and Gods absolute decree confirmed. / By John Wetherall, minister of Spridlington, near Lincolne. March 22. 1651. Imprimatur. John Downame. Wetherall, John, minister of Spridlington. 1652 (1652) Wing W1523; Thomason E661_1; ESTC R206761 53,660 88

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

his life time ignorant of Christ Ad salutis donum omnes homines Universaliter vocari sive per Naturalem sive per Legem scriptam sive per Evangelicam praedicationem All men Universally are called to salvation either by Nature by the Law written or by the preaching of the Gospel so Pelagius Prospers Epist to August Com. 7. And August contra Julian Pelag. lib. 3. Cap. 3. saith thus Deus totumne mundum Redemit Ecce videmus homines in peccatis suis vivere quomodo putabimus Redemptos quos permanere videmus Captivos redimuntur sed non liberantur haec sunt Sententiarum portenta vestrarum haec inopinata mysteria dogmatum novorum haec Paradoxa Pelagianorum Haereticorum That is hath God Redeemed the whole world Behold we see men live still in their sinnes how can we think them to be Redeemed that continue still Captive they are Redeemed out of Prison and yet they are in Prison these are your monstrous imaginations these are your idle mysterious conceits these are the Paradoxes of Pelagian Hereticks If any man list to see these Opinions proved Pelagianisme let him read Perkins Tom. 1. against Universall Grace and his whole Tractate of Gods Free Grace and Mans Free Will Doctor Davenant his whole Book set out after the Councell of Dort Doctor White his Way and Defence of the Way Doctor Twisse Doctor Wille● Calvin Beza Pet. Martyr and all the Divines of the Reformed Churches that writ of this Subject If any object this and that particular man among the Protestants were of a contrary Opinion I answer so they might and yet I may plead the Protestant Churches from this generall Rule there may be two or three Exceptions or William Lilly is out and so is the whole Word And that these Opinions are plain Papistry see Perkins Tom. 1. pa. 98. he reckons up sixteene Errors of the Papists about Predestination and they and our Universalists agree in almost all of them In Doctor Whites Way and Defence the maine Controversies betwixt him and the Jesuits are concerning Universall Redemption whether God will have all men to be saved falling away from Grace certainty of Grace and salvation foreseene Faith and Works Free-will whether God have determined all men good and evill to certaine Ends and the Jesuites Arminians and our Universalists agree in all these Opinions Sure none is so ignorant but if he know any thing he knows Universall Redemption was the very top of the Arminian Tenets at the Councell of Dort it is an Article of the Arminians Faith the cooperation of Mans Free will with Grace in the first Conversion and the power it hath to hinder and frustrate the worke of Regenerating Grace totall and finall falling away from the Grace of Justification these and the like were the Doctrines of Pelagians and Arminians and they are the subject of every Sermon among our Universalists all the Churches of Lower Germany made a complaint to King James against the Armimans and yet such Offenders finde a Sanctuary among our Universalists Therefore I conclude thus If Universall Redemption was the old Heresie of the Pelagians if it be reckoned up among the grossest Opinions of the Papists and agrees in all things with the Arminians then it ought not to be defended or Preached by us Protestants but Universall Redemption was the old Heresie of the P●lagians is reputed among the gressest Opinions of the Papists and agrees in all things with Arminians therefore it ought not to bee defended or Preached by us Protestants The like Argument I may use against all those that defend Universall Election Universall Vocation Foreseene Faith and Works falling away from Grace Free Will c. All these are mong the grossest Opinions of Pelagians Papists Arminians Ergo If these Opinions were truth then no marvell if men run so fast as we see they doe run for what a brave thing is it that God will have all men to bee saved in their sense what a comfortable Doctrine that Grace shall be offered to every one effectually whether he be of the Church or not at one time or other wheresoever or howsoever he live Christ died for all and there will be an offerture of peace on Gods part which is in mans power to accept when he pleases No wonder if men live as they list and doe as wee see they doe this doore being opened to all impieties for yet there is a time say they when Grace shall bee offered effectually to All. Let mee urge a few Arguments in forme not so much against my Adversaries that can say nothing but because I know there are in other Places that are able to say something And first against Universall Redemption I reason thus Arg. 1. To whom Christ was a Redeemer for them he was an Intercessor these two Offices of Christ ought not to be disjoined but Christ was not an Intercessor for all and every one I pray for them I pray not for the World John 17. 9. therefore it followes hee Redeemed not all and every one they cannot bring one place of Scripture to prove he prayed for all and yet to pray for all was far short of powring forth his Bloud Arg. 2 If Christ died for all and every one then hee rose againe ascended and sitteth at his Fathers right hand for all and every one but sure they are afraid to say the last therefore they may be ashamed to say the first disjoyne these Offices in Christ his Death Resurrection Ascension sitting at the right hand of God and they make Christ but halfe a Saviour conjoyne them and by their Opinion it is impossible but all men must be saved if Christ as he died so he rose againe ascended and sitteth at his Fathers right hand for all Arg. 3. Christ was a Lambe slaine from the begining of the world from thence I reason thus if Christ died for all and every one then he died for Caine Esau Pharaoh wicked Jeroboam Antiochus Epiphanes then rayling Rabshakey had his part in Christ Julian the Apostata and also Judas and all that were damned yea and Divells in Hell many thousand yeares before hee suffered death but sure Christians cannot say this I wonder therfore any Christian can say that did hee actually shed his bloud in the last Age of the World for them that were damned in Hell in the first Age of the World Whether is this more ridiculous or impious Arg. 4. If Christ died obteyned Remission of sinnes and Reconciliation with God for all then none are borne the sonnes of wrath by nature or are obnoxious to death and condemnation for Originall sinne all are borne in the state of Grace but the Scripture saith we are by nature the sonnes of wrath and they dare not say that we are borne in the state of Grace then how can they say that Christ obtained Remission of sins and Reconciliation with God for all Arg. 5. If Christ redeemed all and every particular man then God wills
himselfe hath fore-appoynted 6. God ordereth all these sinnes to his owne Glory and the good of his Elect. For the most sinfull Actions of man tend to the manifestation of Gods Glory either as Acts of mercy to the godly in whom sinne produceth punishment punishment Repentance Repentance Faith Faith the Favour of God and the Favour of God Life and Salvation or as Acts of Justice to the Wicked in whom sinne produceth punishment punishment hardnesse of heart hardnesse of heart incredulity incredulity hatred of God and hatred of God death and destruction All which is manifest in the different effects which sinne produced in godly David and in ungodly Pharoah as for example Davids Murther and Adultery occasioned Reproofes and Corrections from God 2. Sam. 12. Psal 6. Psal 22. These corrections and punishments wrought sorrow and Repentance in Davids heart Psal 5. that Repentance Faith and trust in God Psal 30. Psal 31. Psal 52. Psal 23. That Faith and Trust obtained Love and Favour from God Psal 27. and that Love and Favour an assured hope of Life and Salvation Psal 12. But Pharaohs oppressions provoaked God to send his judgements and plagues upon him these plagues they hardned Pharoahs heart that hardnesse of heart caused incredulity that incredulity the hatred of God and that hatred occasioned Pharaohs ruine and destruction in the red Sea as it is Exod. 14. Yea the goodnesse of God made the very drunkenesse and incest of Lot the incest of Judah the malice of the Jewes the treason of Judas and the injustice of Pilate Meanes of mans salvation yea even Adams Fall the fountaine of sinne and misery in man was by the wisdome of God made a meanes of greater happinesse to the Godly then his perseverance and continuance in Innocency could have been For if life had been given as a reward of our just Workes so the wittiest of the Schoolemen Scotus then our Worke being finite could not have merited an infinite reward the enjoyment whereof but one minute had passed our merit whereas life eternall being now conferred upon the faithfull not by way of Debt but by the Free Grace and Mercy of God this infinite Gift is proportioned not according to the meane merits of the Receiver but according to the goodnesse of God the Giver So that even Sinne it selfe on this manner that I have shewed may be said to be of God Let a man spur forward a lame Horse in that he moveth forward the Rider is Cause but that he halteth he himselfe is the cause When we see the Sun Beames shining through a Glasse the Light is from the Sun the Colour not from the Sun but from the Glasse For talis Actio cum tali defectu is not of God as sinfull Actions have in them formalem rationem peccati and are opposite to the Rule of Gods Law so God neither is nor can be the Causer of them yet is he the Cause of that inward or outward naturall Action wherein this defect of mans Will is found Entitas pravae actionis cadit in Voluntatem Divinam yet man hath not onely potentiam in se liberam but liberum usum potentiae not onely free power but also free use of his power as it appeares in Thieves Adulterers and the like who when there is danger doe not yet after do commit such sins God is no Enforcer in sinfull Actions yet may he be a Decreer or Permitter suffering persōs not elected to fall volūtarily into sins to continue volūtarily in thē to their lives end for thē to undergo endless misery in another life God decreed the permission disposing of sin which he fore-saw upon his permission would be but he did not decree the effecting or Existence of it that it should be it more appertained to Gods Omnipotent Goodnesse to draw good out of evill then not to suffer evill to be And as in bad so also in good Actions God not onely fore-sees that a man will use his Free-Will well but wils and preordaines that he shall use it well It is true that men justified by Gods Predestination by their endeavour and deliberation may be said to determine themselves to good Workes I say after Justification but it is God that moves and makes them thus to determine themselves and doe all these things with a Free Will This is a sure Rule a man doth not that good thing which by Grace he is able to doe unlesse God make him to doe it as he hath made him able to do it if he will Ad perseverantiam in Fide Gratia non opus est nova speciali Gratia sufficit ad hoc vel quod Naturà habemus vel quod semel per Spiritum adepti sumus to perseverance in Faith and Grace there needes no speciall Grace Nature or Grace once received is sufficient for this None have beene so bold to say thus but the old Pelagians and later Semi-Pelagians It is true that Christ saith of sinfull Jerusalem How often would I have gathered thy Children together as an Hen gathereth her Chickens and yee would not Mat. 23. 37. But he willed togather them not Voluntate beneplaciti which cannot be resisted but by his revealed Will using the meanes which might had man not falne have beene effectuall that impotency in our Wills comes not from the Creator but from man that fell from his Creator and the Will is now starke dead as to good Actions untill it be enlivened by God This damnable Doctrine that all men were redeemed by Christ but not made free because God distributeth his gifts according to the carelesnesse of such as came to receive them was an old rotten Heresie buried many hundred yeares since and raised up againe by the Devill to disturbe the peace of the Church in our dayes To drive this nayle any further were needlesse had I Men to deal with but my Adversaries many of them are such Beasts as fought with Paul at Ephesus therefore yet once over againe all this I have sayd shall bee poved both by evident Reasons and out of the Word of God For 1. I say God foresees all Contingent Effects to come in his own determination of the Causes thereof and therefore seeing the Contingent Operation of our Will hee determines it to the Effect 2. Els there should bee two severall beginnings of one and the same Effect in as much as Mans Will should begin to work as soon as God and concur to the Effect willed as principally as God 3. The Will of Man is but Gods Instrument the Hatchet the Hammer whereby God hewes out his own worke but every one that useth any Instrument moves applies and determines it to his own will 4. The Will of Man is but a secondary subordinate Cause under the first Cause which is God and exceeds not the measure of second Causes but if it were not determined by the first Cause it should be all one with the first Cause it selfe Second Causes are alwaies