Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	arm_n	extend_v	great_a	24	3	2.1033	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A01858	The vncasing of heresie, or, The anatomie of protestancie. Written and composed by O.A..	Almond, Oliver.	1623 (1623)	STC 12; ESTC S121925	83,475	142

that the Protestant Doctors euen by their owne confessions teach most wickedly concerning Christs death and Passion and therefore are very far from beleeuing a right the fourth Article of the Apostles Creed ARTICLE V. He descended into hell the third day he rose againe frō the dead COncerning the fift Article which treateth of Christs descent into hell and rising againe from the dead whereas it is expresly said in the Article that he descended into hell after he was dea● and buried the Caluino-protestants generally * Zwinglius l. epist 3. Oecolāpadius lib. 1. Epist p 4. Bucerus in c. 27. Mat. Bullinger coment super Epist Petri Hidelbergens Theologi in catechismo an 36. 69 Caluin l. 2. instit c. 16. n. 8. 10. 11. teach that by his descent into hell is meant that he suffered extreame torments on the Crosse and so either vtterly denie this Article or confound it with the former Againe whereas the Scripture plainly saith Thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell and Thou hast brought my soule out of hell c. whence it may be euidently collected as (b) Rogers in his Analacis of the English Articles agreed vpon an 1562. and 1609. art 3. Bezas testament printed an 1556. 1558. 1598. some chiefe Protestants acknowledge that his soule went downe into Hell Beza in the translation of the text readeth Thou shalt not leaue my carcasse in the graue and after (c) See t. 1. operum Bez. an 1582. pag. 461. giueth the reason of this wicked translation to haue bene because the Papists wrest this place to establish their Limbus Moreouer whereas all the (d) Irenaeus l. 4. c. 39. Eusaebius in demonstrat euang l. 10. c 8. Gregor Nazianzene in oratione 2 in pascha Epiphanius haer 46. Ambrose de Myster Paschae c. 4. Chrysostome hom 5. in demonstrat quod sit Deus Hierom in 9. Zachariae epist 3. epitap Nep August l. 20. de Ciuitate Dei c. 15. epist 99. Cyrill in Iohn l. 12. c. 36. Gregorie the great l. 6. epist 179. Paulinus in Panegerico Colsi c. Fathers with one consent out of the Scriptures and this Article as (e) Cal. l. 2. Inst c. 16. n. 9. Caluin him selfe confesseth taught that Christ descended into hel or Limbus freed thence the Patriarkes and Prophets and other true beleeuers and after in his ascension carried them with him triūphantly into heauen the Protestants wil beleue no such matter yea they hold it a (f) Rogers vt supra art 3. pag. 17. Popish errour to affirme that the Fathers which died vnder the Old Law were shut vp in any such place as Limbo and (g) That there is a hell before the last day I am not yet well assured and that there is a particular place where now the soules of the damned are as Painters set out and bellie-slaues teach is nought in my opinion Luther tom 3. Ien. Ger. fol. 212. Christophorus Ireneus also in his booke entituled Speculum inferni cap. 9. affirmeth that the hell of the damned is not yet but that God will make such a place at or after the day of iudgement and the Catechisme of the diuines of Hidelberg an 63. 69. maketh a doubt whether there be any hell or not or any place appointed for the wicked to be punished in after this life See Schlusselberg in theologia Caluin art 27. many of them and those also of the chiefest note make question whether there be any such locall place as hell is affirmed to be by the Catholike Doctors or whether there shall be any hell at all till after doomes-day at the soonest Againe whereas this article expresly saith that Christ rose from death and the (h) I haue power to yeeld my life and I haue power to take it againe Ioh 10.18 The Sonne quickeneth whom he will Iohn 5.21 dissolue this temple and in three dayes I will raise it Iohn 2.19 Caluin in cap. 2. Iohn in 8. ad Rom. Scriptures adde that he rose by his owne power as it must needes be he being himselfe God and equal to his Father according to his diuine nature Caluin saith that it is absurd to hold that Christ did challenge to him selfe the glorie of his owne resurrection since the scripture saith that it was the worke of God the Father and [i] In concione habita Daeipa in portis neustriae an 1564. teste Feuardentio in theomachia Caluin l. 3. haer 17. Franciscus à Sancto Paulo a Minister at Deip expounding that place of S. Paule the God of peace which raysed from death our great Pastor Heb. 13.20 affirmed that Christ could not raise him selfe and therefore it was necessarie that his Father should extend the arme of his vertue to that worke Further the right beleefe of this Article according to expresse (k) Mat. 28. v. 2. Scripture and the ioynt (l) Hier. in 28. Mat. Hilar. l. 6.3 de Trinitate Cyrillus l. 12. in Ioan. ca. 59. 53. Chrysost hom 85. in Iohan. hom 16. de resurrectione Augustine sermon 160. de clausis Ianuis alibi passim consent of all auncient Catholike Doctors is that Christ in his resurrection penetrated the stone and arrose the sepulcher being shutte close as after he entred into the chamber the doores being shut but the Caluino-Protestāts least hence they might be forced to confesse that Christs bodie may as well be in many places at once as that two bodies may be in one place vtterly deny * See Schlusselberg artic 31. p. 163. in Theolog Caluin l. 1. this veritie and say that either he tumbled away the stone whē he rose or that some other rolled it away yea Zwinglius the Protestants sainted confessor and Martir dareth to say that (m) Zwinglius apud Guliel Rainold in Caluino-Turcis l. 3. c. 15. pag. 614. Beza Apolog 2. ad Claud. de Xantes p. 385 Confess Gallica an 1560. Conf. Belgica cōtinent 37. artic quibus synodus Dordraci an 1578 praecipit omnes Hollandiae Ministros subcribere See Feuard in Theolog. Cal. l. 6. cap. 1. Carleil against D. Smith fol. 28. 77. 140. the grossest Sargeant with his redde breeches might haue gone out of the Monument in that maner as Christ did Lastly Beza is of opinion that this Article he descended into hell and rose againe the third day crept by negligence into the Creed yea the French Holland Ministers in the yeares 1569. and 1578. in the Confession of their faith omitted this article and Carliel in a booke printed at London an 1582. calleth this Article a a Tale an Errour and a pernicious heresie From all which premises it will abundantly follow that the Protestants especially those of the Caluinian sect cannot in any point be said to beleeue a right this fift Article of the Apostles Creed ARTICLE VI. He ascended into Heauen and sitteth at the right hand of God the Father Almightie

punishment before the day of Iudgement that to hurt circumuent his enimie d See Gualter in Crono graph saec 8. in collat c. 4. a man might lye and for-sweare him selfe that it was in each mans power when he listed to dissolue Matrimonie that Widdowes might not marrie againe that simple fornication and vsurie were no sinnes that a man was not bound to make restitution of stolne goods that men were to abstaine from blood and all meates prohibited in the Old law that the Eucharist was to be administred to children immediatly after baptisme and the like Lastly they g Powel in praefat l. de antichristo produce as a Protestant witnesse of this age Alphred king of the west Saxons some others whom h See Stow in his Cronicle edi an 1614. pag. 80. all the world knowes to haue bene in all poynts true Roman Catholikes White as aboue § 50. pag. 389. IN the ninth age quoth M. White Otho the great deposed IOHN the Pope assumed into his hands the nominating and making of Popes euer after Which was a manifest resistance made against the grouth of the supremacie So White and citeth for his Author Sigonius In which Sigonius regni Italici l. 7. an 963. after search made finding the contrarie I could not but stand amazed at the frontlesse impudence of this Minister his Cymists For both Sigonius Luitprandus declare that Otho went to Rome with an intent to aid Pope IOHN against Berengarius and Albertus And after comming thither though he was informed by the Bishops of this Popes ill demeanour yet he wrote vnto him a letter Luitprandus l. 6. c. 6. 7. in which he stiled him The chiefe Bishop and vniuersall Pope called the Cardinalls Bishops and Priests his sonnes him selfe his Protectour earnestly praying his FATHERHOOD to make his appearance and answere before the Councel of Bishops for that purpose assembled to such crimes as were obiected against him And after when he appeared not and the Bishops were instant to haue him deposed he only answeared as Sigonius writeth Quando ergo haec praestare statuitis c. Since then you are determined to depose him choose yee another in his roome Illiricus ex Luitprando cent 10. c. 9. col 433. sequent who may be worthie of this seate c. not daring as Illiricus confesseth out of Luitprandus to make him selfe iudge of him that was his Iudge So farre was this good Emperour from presuming on his owne authoritie in the deposition of Popes or arrogating vnto himselfe the making of Popes as this lying heretical Minister affirmeth Arnulphus a learned Catholike Bishop is also * White as aboue pag. 23. produced for a Protestant witnesse of this age but the only reason alleadged which is that he held the Pope to be Antichrist proouing to be a b See Baron an 992. per totū slanderous lie the Protestants cause is but little aduantaged by this witnesse Illiricus in catalogo testium White as aboue IN the tenth age they name Glaber Rodolphus Leuthericus Anselmus Lanfranke and others who are all well knowne Roman Catholikes and notable oppugners of Protestancie They name likewise c White as aboue Berengarius d See Gualter in cronographia saec 1000. in coll c. 1. who yet abiured as hereticall that very poynt for which only he is made a Protestant and dyed reconciled to the Church of Rome They e White as aboue Stephanus Alberstadiensis in epist ad Wolfangum extat apud Dodechi num in additione ad Marianum Scotum an 1090. name also Henry the fourth Emperour of Germanie other of his Bishops nobles The worth of which witnesse you shall heare from the Histographers of that time Omnis qui dignitates spirituales vendit haereticus est c. Euerie one that selleth spiritual dignities is an heretike but Henrie whom they call king doth sell Bishoprikes and Abbotships for he hath sold for money the Bishoprikes of Constance Bamburg and Mintz the Bishoprikes of Reipurth Ausburg and Strasburge for a sword the Abbotship of Fulden for adultrie the bishoprike of Monasterience for Sodomie c. So Stephanus Alberstadiensis while this Henry was yet liuing The Catholike men who liued in that time saith Maerianus hearing and seeing these abhominations Marianus Scotus in Cron. an 1075. and vnheard of wickednes of Henry directed Messengers with letters to ALEXANDER Bishop of the Sea Postolike in which they declared these and manie other things which were done said by the mad Simoniacal heretikes vnder King Henry their Author and patron If you desire to know saith Krantzius the praises of Henry he was noble Krantzius l. 5. Saxon. c. 24. learned strong tall and of a Kingly Maiestie but on the other side the heynous offences which he committed are incredible to be spoken c. Auentine also saith Auentine l. 5. anal Boron ● pag. 563. that his very freinds cannot deny but that Henry was infamous for rauishments adultries c. He was held by all Catholikes saith Vspergensis for an arch-pirate an apostata Vspergensis in crônic an 1068. Caluin l. 4. inst c. 11. n. 3. see Bellarmine l. 1. de translat Rō Imperij c. 9. tom 7. arch-heretike and a greater persecutor of mens soules then of their bodies c. So all the writers of that time to which you may adde the testimonie of Caluin who plainly confesseth that this Henry was a man light rash and of no iudgement of wounderful dissolutenesse of life Who had in his Hall all the bishorikes of Germany partly to be sould and partly to be exposed for a pray To this you may * Note that this Henrie the 3. or as some call him the fourth in the time he stroue with the Pope for the inuestiing of Bishops by Ring and Staffe was deposed by his owne sonne and imprisoned whence escaping after a second defeat was brought to such miserie that he sued to be a Sexton in a Church but not admitted to that office he fell to begge of Lay men crying in lamentable maner Haue mercie vpon me at least you my friendes for the hand of the Lord hath touched me and so full of miserie and repentant sorrow he pyned to death to the great reioycing of al Christendome See Sigonius de reg Italico l. 9. in Hen. 4. adde that he afterward submitted him selfe to Rome and acknowledged the Popes supremacie as BELLARMINE proueth at large IN the eleuenth age they name Henry the fift Emperour of that name who in the beginning of his raigne insisted in the steps of his father before mentioned See Abbas Vspergensis in cron an 1110. but seeing as it is well knowne he afterward recanted and was reconciled to the Sea Apostolike he ceased to be a Protestant witnesse They produce in like maner an other of their Gransires in this age White as aboue the Emperour Fredertcke