unto his Majesty in the year 1575. to negotiate a general peace betwixt the King and his discontented Subjects as well Papists as Protestants This Ambassador in the preamble of his Speech to the King used these words We thank God that it hath pleased him so highly to favour us as to send us a King that both will and can hear himself the wants and complaints of his Subjects and order and redress the same according to his good pleasure and the laudable course of Justice For if our Writers have imployed their Labours in writing to blame and reprehend those Kings which hear not but by the Ears of others which see not but by the Eyes of others and speak not but by the Mouthes of others We have most great occasion to think our selves very happy and blessed unto whom God hath sent a King so gentle and so loving unto his Subjects as that he will hear all our causes and controversies himself and a King of so rare and excellent Wisdom as that he is able to decide and determine our Contentions This commendation given him by Seigneur Darennes far exceedeth Sir Henry Cobhams because he was the Ambassador of a Prince that was in League with the late King and the Siegneur Darennes of a Prince that not long before had born arms against this King And Sir Henry might speak for favour but the other spake as he thought because it appeareth by the rest of the speeches which he used in the same negotiation that he neither would or could dissemble And because this praise and commendation was given by an Enemy rather then by a friend it cannot but be void of all partiality assertion or flattery Thus you have heard the French Kings Vertues and his Imperfections the Leaguers folly and the Spanish Kings indiscretion Now it resteth to declare unto you his further error which although it be the last yet it is not the least and I fear me I shall have occasion to enlarge my self more of it then I did of the other three It is not unknown unto all or most part of the World that the King of Spain too much crediting the light and false reports of certain English Fugitives did once attempt and doth still intend to invade and subdue England This attempt and this intention although it seemeth to be grounded upon good reasons and to be allowed by the wisest Councellors yet I will shew that it was neither begun with wisdom nor is continued with any great discretion To shew this it shall be needful to examine all and every of the causes which moved him to undertake this attempt and purpose The causes are many and some of them are already sufficiently declared others rest first to be discovered and then then to be confuted It hath already been shewed that for succouring of France for aiding of Flanders for intercepting his money and for favouring and furthering of Don Antonio his resolution to recover the Kingdom of Portugal the Spanish King had no just occasion to be offended with the Queens Majesty It remaineth to prove that the Popes Excommunication That the false and sinister reports of the English Fugitives the death of the late Queen of Scots OF the sending away of his Ambassador with some small disgrace out of England giveth him no just occasion to trouble her Majesties quiet and peaceable Government All this being proved his indiscretion shall be made appear by three principal Reasons The first because he took no good course for the accomplishment of his enterprise The second Because that although his course had been good yet he neither was nor is able to subdue England And the third Because albeit he should chance to conquer our Realm yet he could not hold the same long The order whereunto I have tied my self requireth that I begin with the Popes Excommunication And for the better clearing of this point it were necessary to shew what Authority he hath to excommunicate But this is a matter that requireth a whole and large Volume and therefore I have thought good not to medle therewith but to refer you for your better instruction unto the large Apology which Marsilius Paturius wrote above 266 years ago in the defence of the Emperor Lewis of Baviera against the Pope that would not admit or allow him for Emperor There you shall see that the Pope although he were Christs lawfull and indubitate Vicar a point which never was nor will be proved yet he hath no more Authority then Christ himself had There you shall read that Christ came not into the world to Rule that he took not upon him to Command Princes but that both he himself obeyed and taught his Apostles to obey Princes There you shall understand that Saint Paul the Apostle Saint Peter and other of Christs Disciples obeyed the Civil Magistrate and submitted themselves unto Temporal Government There briefly you shall learn that not Clergy man ought to meddle with Temporal matters And that the Pope hath no more Authority to pardon sins or excommunicate any man then other Inferior Priests and Ministers have All this being true as in that Apology you shall finde it learnedly substantially and sufficiently proved not by humane Reasons which may be erroneous but by sacred Scriptures which cannot be controlled your own discretion may sufficiently warrant you that this Excommunication can be of no great force And yet because many of our Countrimen attribute too much unto the Popes Authority and cannot be perswaded but that he came unto the same directly and holdeth it immediately from Christ. I will shew you as briefly as I can how the Pope of Rome attained unto that great Authority which he now enjoyeth It appeareth by Du Haillan in the French Chronicle that in the time of Charles the Great the Popes of Rome had no power or authority in Rome it self they medled but onely with matters of Religion with Ecclesiastical Discipline and with points of Divinity It appeareth also by Platina Dr. Illescas and Robert Barnes three notable Writers of the Popes lives the first being an Italian the second a Spaniard and the third an Englishman that many years after Christs passion and after St. Peters death they were cruelly massacred and martyred by the Emperors of Rome It is also notorious and apparent by the testimony the same Writers and of many more that they were wont to be chosen approved and confirmed by the Roman Emperors insomuch that he was not held for a lawful Pope which had not the Emperors approbation Briefly you shall find in the Histories and Chronicles of France that three Popes being chosen at one time they came into France the Kings whereof were then also Emperors to excuse themselves and their election because it was made without the consent or privity of the Emperor and to stand to his opinion that then was Emperor which of the three should be Pope but now there is a great alteration and a marvellous change
and death over their subjects yet he is to be accompted a Tyrant that causeth any of his Subjects to be done to death without having deserved to lose his life and this authority given them by Law and common consent of their subjects tendeth to no other purpose nor respecteth any other end then that sin may be punished and malefactors not permitted to live both to the scandal and detriment of well doers If therefore Escovedo committed no offence worthy of death the King had no power no warrant no authority to take away his life his offence therefore must be known the nature quality and circumstances thereof well examined and duly considered and according as his crime shall fall out and prove to be great or small pardonable or capital so shall the Kings actions seem punishable or excusable All that Antonio Peres his Book chargeth him withal is that he had secret intelligence with the Pope the King of France and the Duke of Guise wherein he was set on by his master Don Iohn de Austria who was the King's Lieutenant General and by vertue of this office represented the Kings own person and was armed with his authority if not in all things yet in as much as concerned the execution of his charge and commission The question then must be whether the Secretary unto such a Lieutenant performing that which is commanded by his master may be taken and condemned for a Traytor Treason hath many branches and is of divers kinds and it would be tedious and troublesome to make a recital of them all And it shall suffice to declare whether any of the actions specified in this accusation be within the compass of Treason He wrote Letters to whom To the Pope Why He was no enemy but a friend to the King of Spain What was the tenor and contents of this Letter Nothing else but that it might please his Holiness to recommend one Brother unto another Why That was an office of kindness and not of treason And for what purpose desireth he to have him recommended Forsooth for the employment in the service and enterprise that was to be made against England Why that service liked the King and proceeded first from him it tended to his benefit it was to be undertaken in revenge of his supposed wrongs against his enemy and all this is no treason And for whom wrote he For Don Iohn de Austria his Kings Brother the Pope's Darling and Turks scourge the Princes of Italies Favourite the Queen of Englands terror and the whole Worlds wonder But he wrote without the King's privity How shall he know that Had he not good cause to think that all that he did was done with the King's counsel and consent Had he not eyes to see and ears to hear and discretion to consider that whatsoever was done against England should be both grateful and acceptable unto the King I but he might think that the King would not be content to have his Brother made a King Why He was his Lieutenant already and so next to a King He had done him great service and was to do him more and so deserved no small recompence he had the Title of a Duke but no Living fit for a Duke the vertues and valour of a King but no possibility to be a King but by his Brothers favour and furtherance briefly he desired that honour and Escovedo perhaps thought the King meant to prefer him to that honour the rather because the King might be led to advance him to a Kingdom in his life time by his fathers example who prefers his Brother Ferdinando to the Empire before he died himself why then be it that he was either deceived in his cogitation or beguiled with the love of his Master or went further then he had warrant to go why lawful ignorance extenuateth the gravity of and as to annoy a Princes enemy so to pleasure his friend was never punishable or at any time accounted treason But when the enterprise against England failed he solicited the Pope for the Kingdom of Tunis but how Not to have it without the Kings good leave and liking And when made he that motion Even then when the Princes of Italy and the wisest Counsellors of Europe stood in fear of the common enemy doubted that Tunis might be recovered by the Turk and therefore thought it meet to have so valorous and victorious a Prince there as was Don Iohn de Austria who having the Kingdom in his own right would be the more willing and ready to defend it and was this desire an offence Or could this motion be counted treason He might have remembred that Don Iohn de Soto was removed from serving Don Iohn de Austria because he furthered him in the like enterprizes But he saw him preferred to a place of greater honour and commodity which gave him just occasion to think that the King rather liked then disallowed his actions Thus you see there is no desert of death in practising with the Pope Now it remaineth to consider how this dealing in France with the King or the Duke of Guise may be justly esteemed a crime capital It appeareth that the French King was then in League with the Spaniard whose Ambassador was then residing in his Court and Ambassadors are not permitted to remain but where there is a League of Amity betwixt Princes The Guisards affection hath been declared to have been always greater towards Spain then towards France And the enterprize of England might seem unto Don Iohn de Austria very difficult yea impossible without some favour without some help from France if then to favour this enterprize he had some secret intelligence with France is he therefore blame-worthy Or hath it ever been counted a fault in a servant or Lieutenant to seek all lawful and honourable ways to bring to pass his Masters desire and purpose Do Princes prescribe unto their Lieutenants or Ministers all that they can do to compass and effect their designs Do they not rather give them a few short Instructions and leave it to their discretion and wisdom to foresee and use other means to further their intentions Is not this the reason why they make choice of wise and discreet men for such employments Is not this the cause that when they send young Noblemen either to Wars or Ambassadors or to forraign Governments they are ever accompanyed with grave and wise Counsellors Briefly Is it not this that moveth them to command that their young Lieutenants Ambassadors or Governours shall do nothing without their Counsellors I know that it is very dangerous to be employed in Princes affairs Danger in conceiving a message and Danger in delivering the same and danger in reporting an answer thereunto And yet be it that a messenger conceiveth not a business rightly that he delivereth not his will and pleasure as he should do and that he faileth in report of his answer to whom he is sent yet he committeth not a
committing the fact with his wife or daughter is not punished with death by Law because the greatness of his sorrow excuseth the grievousness of his offence and a man that being provoked by another by word or deed killeth the provoker is not subject to extream rigour of justice because whatsoever is done in heat of choler is rather excusable in mercy then punishable with extremity The King of Spain's life stood in no danger as long as Escovedo lived he had offered no violence to his wife or daughter and if he gave him any occasion to be angry or displeased with him there was time enough betwixt the occasion given and the hour of his death to allay the heat and to asswage his wrath There is not therefore any one just cause to excuse this murther but many to aggravate the same For first A King commanded it to be committed and Kings ought to preserve not murther their subjects Next an innocent man was murthered and it is better to save many offenders then to condemn one innocent Then the murtherer was as it were a father to the murthered Kings are called fathers of their subjects Again Escovedo was no stranger but the Kings servant and it is much more grievous to kill an houshold servanâ— then a stranger Again Escovedo was no base person but of good worth and of divers good qualities and he offendeth more that killeth an adulterer of good sort then he that murthereth one of vile and base condition Again Escovedo had deserved well of the King and had done him many good services and ingratitude is a detestable vice a fault punishable by Law Again Escovedo was done to death against Law and to murther a man without Law is a double breach of Law a breach in the murther and a breach in not observance of Law Again Escovedo was poysoned and the murther that is done with poyson because it is trayterously done is much more grievous then that which is performed Therefore Lastly When poyson took no effect he was killed with a sword and the murther that is iterated is more hainous it argueth perseverance in wickedness it sheweth that the offender is obdurate in malice it betrayeth his cruelty and declareth that nothing but death will satisfie him so it is sin in a Prince to think on such a murther wickedness to command it to be done cruelty to thirst after innocent blood ingratitude to render evil for good treason to take away a mans life by poyson and of all treasons the greatest when poyson faileth to use the sword and when God hath miraculously preserved an innocent man to attempt his death again and never to desist until he was massacred For Princes are armed with authority but they are to use the sword only against the wicked they may be cruel but with a kind of mercy and compassion they may censure all mens actions but with remembrance of mans imbecility with grief for their fall with sorrow for their temptation with hope of their amendment and with a desire of their conversion They must think that ignorance may mislead them Satan seduce them sin get the upper hand of them Gods good grace abandon them and that being destitute of his favour they are no more able to make any resistance against the divel 's temptations and when they have thought upon all this they must look upon themselves and in themselves consider that they be angry but without fin they may be moved but not so much as to forget to do justice punish offenders without hatred to their persons and not before that reason hath mastered their own affections mercy hath mitigated their rigour and wisdom hath nullified all the extremity of their inordinate passions This murder being then in thought in action in continuance and in iteration impious and detestable it resteth therefore to shew whether Antonio Peres yeilding his consent and putting his helping hand thereunto be not guilty of Escovedo his death as well as the King For the affirmative it may be said that in cases of felony murther and treason the principals and accessaries are held to offend in one and the same measure because they are most commonly subject to one and the same manner of punishment That servants to private men and Counsellors to Princes must obey God rather then their Masters the almighty in heaven rather then the mighty on earth That Peres knew in conscience that Escovedo had not deserved death That no man should do any thing against his Conscience and that Counsellors attend upon Princes to be disswaders of their follies and not executioners of their furies It had therefore been the part of Antonio Peres when he saw his King resolute to have Escovedo murthered not to have reprehended his wicked intention presently but to have attended some convenient time when the Kings fury and anger had been past when he would have hearkned unto reason and given an attentive ear unto good counsel and then not to have spared his tongue or his pen his counsel or his cunning his wits or his credit with his master until he had changed his mind For wise and discreet officers unto Princes will not presently obey their hasty furious and unadvised commandments but give them time to allay and pacifie and to consider with themselves what they have commanded and what mischiefs and inconveniencies may follow of their commandments And the Prince that hath such may think himself happy and when of a servant to his passions he returneth happily to himself that is to be a right Prince then will he thank them heartily for their good counsel It is written of a Duke of Britany that when he had taken Clission an high Constable of France who had made the French his mortal enemy and caused him to work his Countries great harm and annoyance he delivered him into the hands of Iohn Bavilion his trusty and faithful servant and commanded him to be caused to be drowned secretly Bavilion considering what danger might follow of his rash and hasty commandment preserved the Constable and within a few days after when he saw the Duke his master very pensive and sorrowful he presumed to demand the cause of his grief The Duke not being able to conceal any thing from him although he thought not to have found such comfort as he did by him acquainteth Bavilion with the â—â—use of his heavines which was that he had caused the Constable so unadvisedly to be made away Bavilion seeing the time fit to declare what he had done let the Duke understand that Clisson lived and by way of advice told him that by restoring his prisoner in safety without a ransome unto the French King he should bind the Constable to do him all manner of good offices about the king of France purchase the Kings assured friendship and procure his own Countries safety and quiet For which good counsel the Duke thanked him as much as for saving the Constable and found that by following
and Antonio Peres his voluntary confession which is a slender kind of proof and especially against a King for exceptions may be made and taken against it As that Antonio Peres bewrayeth his own filthiness and therefore is not to be heard That he is but one witness That he is as Socius Criminis and therefore his accusation of little force and many other like which for brevity I omit and will dispute tanquam ex concessis and have two principal reasons to induce me thereunto The first because I presume that no man will be so impudent as to accuse a King and his own Soveraign to his face and to the view of all the world of a horrible murther unless his accusation were true and tended rather to purge himself then to defame and discredit his Prince The second cause I find that the Spanish Kings friends and favourers have not made any conscience or difficulty to calumniate our Princess her life and actions upon far more slender presumptions then we have of this murther The Author of that seditious Book which was written against the late King of France delivereth it for his resolute opinion That the said King deserved to lose his Crown because he not only consented but also commanded the Duke of Guise and the Cardinal his Brother to be murthered He aggravateth his murther by three principal reasons and instances The first Because they were innocent The second Because they were allied unto the King And the third Because they were massacred by common murtherers These reasons have already been sufficiently reproved Their innocency hath been shewed to be horrible treasons their alliance unto their King not worthy of pardon or commiseration and their death to be warrantable by Law and equity It resteth to make a brief comparison betwixt them and Escovedo and the comparison may be this Escovedo practised with friends they with foes He for the King's Brother they against the King his Brother and all his blood He to the benefit of his Prince and Country they to the hurt and ruine of the King and his realm He with the consent and command of the King's Lieutenant they against the will and pleasure of all the King 's loving and faithful Officers He to reduce the King's subjects to their obedience they to alienate their Princes subjects from their allegiance He to submit strangers unto his Princes Dominions and they to subject their Prince and Country unto strangers He to â—oyn other Countries with the Spanish Kings they to dismember and distract many provinces from the French Crown He was never admonished to desist they were oft-times required to depart from their unlawful League and Confederacy He was cut off before he came to any open action they lived after they had committed many notable and notorious treasons He was accused but of presumption they were convicted by divers and evident proofs He perished because it was thought he would or might have done evil they were not executed before it appeared that they had done too much evil He living could not endanger his Kings life and they if they had not been slain when they were would have shortned their King's days and utterly have subverted his Realm and their Country Briefly his death did the Spanish King no good their punishment had freed the French King and his Country of many troubles and dangers had not a factious and wicked Fryer ended his life before he could see an end of those troubles If ergo the King of France deserved to be excommunicated and deposed for murthering them much more deserveth the King of Spain the like punishment for massacring him although they far excelled him in honour and dignity And if great crimes are to be punished with great penalties small offences with small correction and such as the fault is such is the chastisement I shall not need to prove my opinion with more arguments And if the common and Ecclesiastical Laws have no greater punishment then degradation and excommunication and both of them are equal unto deposition unto death in the Civil Law and if for what faults they may be afflicted by an Ecclesiastical Judge deposition and death may be imposed for the same crimes by a Civil Magistrate Murther being punished with degradation and excommunication in an Ecclesiastical Court Murther must needs be capital before a Temporal Judge But what need I stand any longer upon the proof of my opinion The Author of the before-named seditious Book easeth me of that pain Ergo since the Law saith Such Judgement as a man giveth against another such must he expect and look for himself and he that approveth a witnesses honesty and integrity when he is produced to testifie in a matter for him cannot refuse to take exceptions against his person if he chance to be brought forth afterwards for a witness in another cause against him The Leaguers were the Spanish King's friends who by the mouth of this author have condemned the French King for a murtherer and have thought him worthy to be deprived for those murthers must needs allow the same reasons the same Law the same judgement against the Spaniard Thus the third question is cleared Now followeth the fourth in the handling whereof I shall likewise be eased by the same author for the same examples which fortifie his opinion may serve to confirm my assertion He mentioneth many Princes who were deposed or excommunicated or censured by the Pope for murther The Princes deposed were Ptolomeus Phisco King of Egypt Tarquinus superbus King of Rome Philip King of Macedonia Herdanus King of Castile and Edward and Richard both the second Kings of England The Kings excommunicated by the Pope were Peter King of Castile whom Pope Urban excommunicated because he killed Blanch the daughter of the Duke of Barbon and divers Peers of his Realm Maganus Nicholas King of Denmark who was likewise excommunicated for the murther committed by his sons procurement on the person of Canutus his Nephew And lastly King Iohn of England who incurred the like punishment for causing his Nephew Arthur to be murthered without any desert without any due observance of Law or Equity The same author aggravateth again the French King's murther because the Cardinal was an Ecclesiastical man and a man of great Calling and Dignity and proveth again his opinion by the example of Henry the eighth King of England whom the Pope excommunicated and absolved his subjects from the oath and duty of obedience which they owed unto him because he cause Fisher Bishop of Rochester to be done to death And by the example of Bolislaus King of Poland whom Gregory the seventh not only excommunicated but also deprived him of his Crown and Dignity because he had killed holy Stomlaus But it may be said that the French King killed two and the Spaniard but one that Escovedo was a man of no such quality as the Duke and the Cardinal that their death alone was not the only crime that
may please you and these Wonders to enter into consideration of the Spaniards Nature and of the Flemmings Qualities and to call to mind the Levity of the one and the Cruelty of the other the Weakness of them and the Pride of these and how ready they are to take and these to give occasion of Rebellion you will leave to wonder at their revolt and distraction from the bondage of the Spaniard Read the Chronicles of Flanders and you shall find that there was never any Nation more mutinous more easie to be displeased more prone and ready to Rebel then the Flemmings You shall likewise find that they are far more fit to be Governed by Gentleness then by Rigor and by Women then by men You shall likewise find that they have seldom lived in long Peace and Obedience under any of their natural Princes if he did not Rule and Govern them with all manner of humanity And finding this you must needs think that there can be no long Agreement betwixt them and the Spaniard whose nature is to Command Imperiously to Rule Proudly and to Govern Tyrannically as it appeareth in all places where he beareth Sway or Government The House of Austria had their beginning in Hasburg in Switzerland whence as you shall read in Smiller they were driven by the Subjects for their extream Tyranny By Marriage they are grown from poor Earls unto mighty Princes and have spread themselves over divers Nations over which how they have Tyrannized the very Histories of those Nations do report and witness You shall read of their persecutions in the Indies Of their Exactions in the Kingdom of Naples Of theâ— Extortion in the Dutchy of Millan Of their Pride and Arrogancy in Germany Of their hard and cruel dealing in the County of Burgundy Of their late Cruelty in Portugal and of their intolerable oppression in all places You shall read that ever since they began to be in Authority in the world they have troubled the Tranquility and Peace of most part of the world You shall read that Italy France and Germany have suffered more injuries wrongs and indignities by them only then by all other Princes and Royal Families of Christendom You shall read that Maximilian the Emperor Charles the fifth and this present King of Spain disquieted and troubled the peaceable Estates of all other Princes that lived or live in their time Briefly You shall read that they have always had high minds unsatiable desires ambitious projects marvelous designs and purposes which if it had not pleased the Almighty to prevent and cross by sundry unexpected Accidents they had long before this time made themselves Monarchs of the universal world This is so apparent and well known unto all men that know never so little of the knowledge which is gathered from Histories That I shall not need to stand upon the proof thereof and to confirm the same by Examples No marvel then since the Low-Countries did all at the first with one mutual consent Rebel and the United Provinces do yet bear Arms against the Spaniard defending themselves by power and might from his wrongs and violence who gave them many just occasions to Revolt from his Obedience Before they Revolted he Ruled them by Strangers being bound to Govern them by their own Country-men He brake dayly their Priviledges and Customes being sworn duly to keep and observe them He preferred meer Strangers and men of base condition unto the best and highest Offices over them having protested and undertaken by Oath to constitute no such Magistrates overthem as were not born in their own Country He altered the State of the Clergy without their consent having promised not to innovate any thing therein without their Counsel and permission He caused to be done to death the best of their Nobilty without any such form of Judgment as their Laws and Priviledges required He charged them with new Imposts and intolerable Tributes without their advice and consent whose counsel and consent he was to use therein He called them to consult upon matters of weight and importance in such places as they might not appear Lastly He placed such Governours over them as sought and wrought the death of the best Maintainers and Upholders of their Ancient Priviledges as filled the Country with odious and suspected People as bandied and combined themselves with Forrainers against their States as sought and took all occasions possible to sow Debate and Sedition betwixt their Nobles and Princes as charged their Nobility with false and untrue Accusations as declared the better part of them to be Traytors and Rebels because they would not at their commandment make open Wars against the Prince of Orange the only Patron and Pillar of their Liberties as seized and took into their hands the frontire Towns and Forts as builded Citadels to bridle and Castles to bridle and keep them in awe Briefly as turned their Peace into War their Wealth into Poverty and their Rest and Tranquâ—â—ity into Tumults and Troubles Can any Prince do greater wrongs unto his Subjects then these are Or can any Subjects suffer greater injuries then these Especially such a Prince as was no longer Prince then he observed their ancient Priviledges Especially such Subjects as were no longer bound to their Prince then he kept their Liberties inviolable Such a Prince as lost his Authority over them so soon as he brake the Conditions whereupon he was received And such Subjects who were freed from all manner of Obedience so soon as these Conditions were broken Such a Prince as was requested by all the Princes of Christendom not to Tyrannize over his Subjects and would not hearken to their perswasions and requests And such Subjects as besought the Princes of Christendom to be their Intercessors to their Prince and could not prevail with him Briefly Such a Prince as when he had long vexed and wearied his Subjects with intolerable charges and unsupportable wrongs might have had infinite wealth of his Subjects to receive them into his good Grace and Favour and would not accept their offer And such Subjects as offered to give their Prince three Millions of Gold to suffer them to live in liberty of conscience and could not be heard These Subjects therefore had good occasion to forsake and renounce this Prince And the Wars which they undertook against him were in my simple opinion most lawful Not that I approve Rebellion or allow Subjects to Rebel against their Soveraigns when or for what occasions they will but that I dis-allow and dislike the Prince that will Govern and Rule his Subjects in all things as he lists There is a mutual bond betwixt the Subject and the Prince there is a reciprocal League there is on both sides a certain duty in the one to obey reverently and in the other not to command over rigorously The reverence of the Subjects conserveth the Majesty of a Prince and the Lenity of a Prince maintaineth the
to pass The first of the three was the late Kings especial Favour The second an Office of great Account and Dignity The third that the rest of the Court should be at his Will and Commandment either for love towards him or for fear of his Greatness and Authority For the purchasing and assurance of the Kings favour he useth two principal means The one to let the King understand that he was now grown to so great power and strength that it was impossible for his Majesty to supplant or suppress the same The other to perswade the King not only by words but also by good carriage of himself that he would never abuse that his power but always use it to his Highness benefit and his Majesties service keeping the King by this means always betwixt love and fear and increasing the number of his friends and followers by gratifying some with Offices others with money and still imploying his Purse his Credit and his Countenance for the strengthning of his Party and that in such manner as the King could not but perceive it yet he dissembleth so cunningly protesteth so devoutly and sheweth sometimes so apparent effects of his good will and dutiful obedience to the King that his Majesty distrusteth not his proceedings And for the better continuance of the King in that opinion he marketh what is done in every Province willeth many things to be done that were acceptable and pleasing to the Kings humours and still writeth unto his Friends and Kinsmen that they should shew their obedience in small things and in matters of no great moment that they might the better be trusted in matters of more great weight and profit to the furtherance of his and their designs Now for the obtaining of such an Office as might both countenance him and prefer his Friends he very subtily insinuateth himself into the Queen Mothers favour unto whom the King had committed the Administration and charge of the weightiest affairs of his Kingdom he maketh the Kings principal Secretary sure unto him causeth him to procure his return to the Court when he was once commanded by the King to depart thence in disgrace bringeth it to pass by him that the Duke of Espernon his greatest enemy should be banished the Court and that after his departure the same Secretary should continually seek and procure his discredit and contrariwise further him in all his Attempts and Endeavours lest that the King recalling in time the Duke Despernon might be induced by him to displace and discountenance them both And whilst he is in this favour he sueth to be High Constable of France meaning in time to use the same Office as Charls Martel did for a step and Ladder to climb up to the Kingdom which Office he saith was of such antiquity and necessity as that as soon as there was a King in France there was also a High Constable and that their Estate never flourished better then when the Crown was provided of such Officers as should and did execute their Offices and Charges in as ample manner as their Commissions gave them power and Authority to do Besides seeing that the Queen Mother either at the first or at the last obtained whatsoever it pleased her of the King and that whosoever he was were he never so highly in the Kings favour that displeased her in time lost the Kings good will and good opinion He so carried himself towards her that he seemed to affect nothing more then her good liking and yet not to be so desirous thereof as that he would wholly depend thereupon knowing that the King although he did always attribute much unto his Mother and was contented that she should be reverenced and respected next unto himself yet he could not well brook them that sought for her good will more then for his Favour and thus with cunning continuing a firm League of love and amity betwixt the Mother and the Son he hoped in time to possess them both in such manner as before they should be aware thereof he would assume unto himself the power and authority of them both And further perceiving that the Kings old Secretaries were not in all respects so pliant and ready to follow and fulfil his designs as he wished he laboured by all means possible to prefer them unto Offices of higher dignity and to place others in their rooms who would not fail to further his intents and purposes nor disdain to depend wholly upon his favour and also to make him privy to whatsoever business or affairs of Estate they were commanded to dispatch by the King whereby he came to perfect knowledg of all that was purposed or determined by the Kings privy Councel And grew into such favour and credit that even the principal Officers of the Crown either for fear or for love or by other mens examples submitted themselves wholly unto his devotion And he had such interest in the Kings Court and Courtiers that all or the most part of them seemed to be at his only disposition and to affect him more then their King and Soveraign Having installed himself in this manner in the Court and distracted the hearts of the principal Officers thereof from their duty and love to their King he thinketh it not sufficient to be invested in their favours unless he might also captivate the affections and good wills of the common people whom by promise to relieve their necessities to ease their charges to supply their wants and to redress all that was thought or suggested to be amiss the common means used in all times and all ages by men of his mind to seduce and mis-lead a multitude he easily and quickly perswadeth to favour his party And finding the common sort so ready willing and desirous to perform and accomplish his pleasure as that in respect of their obedience towards him he seemeth to lack nothing but the only name of King to be a King Notwithstanding the great Honor and Reverence that Courtiers shewed unto him the love and affection that the Commonalty bear to him the Offices and Dignities which he partly affected and partly attained the high Attempts and Imaginations which he lodged in his heart and conceit and the unaccustomed Authority which he cunningly had usurped yet he was so far from being puffed up with pride or disdain towards his inferiours faults commonly incident unto men advanced unto extraordinary favour and preferment that for the better continuance of his credit and the peoples good will towards him he would debase and so much deject himself as that he thought not scorn to go bare headed from one end of the Street unto another even unto base Chrochelers and Porters with which his demeanor the Duke De Mayne his Brother was many times highly displeased and could not at any time frame himself to follow and imitate him therein which hath appeared more manifestly since his death the common people in regard of that want not favouring him so highly as
were as yet not seen moved with reverence prepared the Ark to the saving of his Household By faith Abraham obeyed God when he was called to go into a place which he should afterwards receive for an Inheritance By faith Sarah received strength to coâ—ceivâ— Seed and was delivered of a Child when she was past Age. By faith Moses forsook Egypt By faith he with his people passed through the red Sea as on dry Land By faith the Walls of Iericho fell downe after they weâ—e compast about seven dayes And by faith â—he Prophets subdued Kingdoms stopped the mouthes of Lyons quenched the violence of Fire escaped the Edge of the Sword of weak were mâ—de strong waxed valiant in Battaile and turned to Flight the Armies of the Aliens Then since faith is of this force and efficacy shall not the faithfull bee able to convert them by whose conversation they shall reape no small benefit for if any man hath erred from the truth saith St Iames and some men hath converted him know that he that hath called the sinner from going astray out of his way shall save a soul from death and shall hide a multitude of sins And is it not a thing commendable before men acceptable unto God and worth the lâ—bours of any good Christian to save a soul and to hide a great multitude of sins But to leave these Divine arguments and to come unto humane reasons because they are more pleasing and acceptable to children of this world whom mee thinketh it should suffice for proof that Papists and Protestants may live in peace and quietness together because that in Poland where there are many Religions professed you seldome heare of any civil contention and in Switzerland in many Townes thereof the Papists and Protestants eate together lye in bed one with another marry together and that which is most strange in one Church you shall have a Mass and a Sermon and at one Table upon Fish daiâ—s Fish and Flesh the one for Papists the other for Protestants And whosoever shall look upon the present State of Spaine or the present Government of Italy in this Age in which Countries there is but one Religion professed shall finde no greater peace no more assured Friendship no streighter League of Amiâ—ie amongst them then there is amongst the people of Poland Switzerland and other Nations which give Friendly entertainment unto pluralitie of Religions neither can any mâ—n say with reason that the Protestants of Flanders have been the occasion of the unnaturall variance and civill dissention which now troubleth their Country For there is no man that reverenceth the Magistrate obeyeth the Laws of God and man or fulfilleth the true sense and meaning of boâ—h Laws more willingly then they as their Supplications their Leâ—ters their Apologies do testifie It is not they but their Enemies not they but their evill Governors not the Inhabitants of their Country but the Strangers sent into the Country and delâ—ghted wiâ—h the pleasures and the profits thereof that have occasioned these Troubles Neither is it to be thought that so many Princes as the King of France the Queen of England the Archduke of Austria and the late Duke of Anjou being all strangers unto them would ever have undertaken their defence and pâ—otection if they had thought or seen that the principal câ—use of Sedition might justly be imputed unto them It was the Tyranny of Don Iohn de Austria the Crueltie of the Duke of Alva the intolerable Priâ—e of the Spaniards in general the unreasonable exaction of the Hundreth the Twentieth and the Tenth Penny of â—vâ—ry mans substance together with other Causes mentioned in the bâ—ginning of this discourse that caused the forcible distraction of them from the usuall and dutifull Obedience Devotion service and observance of their Prince Iâ— the time of Philip the Fairâ— King of France as now in the Raigne of Philip the second King of Spaine whereby it may appeare that the name of Philip hath been fatall unto this Country there were the like troubles is Flanders as there are now and as now there were some of the Country it selfe that favoured Spaine more then their owne libertie so then there were many Liliari that tendred the French Kings Factions more then the safetie of their owne Connâ—ry and as now so then those Liliari together with the King of â—â—ance imputed the cause of the Troubles and Wars unto the peevish willâ—ullness of the poor Flemings and not to the perverse obstinacy and obdurate malice and crueltie of the French King and his Councellors Moreover as now so then diverse flourishes and shâ—wes of peace were made unto the Flemings not because they that offered those conditions of peace meant to performe them but to make the world believe that they were desirous of Peace whereas indeed their tender of peace was but to save themselves from the hazard of a Battel when they saw there was no way but to take it either with some great disadvantage or to forsake it with great dishonour Such offers of peace were those that have been lately made unto the United Provinces and such were they that were tendered many years ago by which the Spaniards received alwaies some benefit sometimes he got a Town a Hold or a Castle sometimes he distracted some of the Nobility from the Prince of Oranges faction and at other times he avoided some eminent danger which could not otherwise be escaped This will appear most true and manifest unto as many as shall read divers Apologies set out by the Prince of Orange and the States of the Low-Countries And therefore I know not with what conscience or with what shew of truth the cause of this Civil Discord may be ascribed unto the Subjects of Flanders and not unto the king of Spain and his evil Officers The first and second Reasons are sufficiently refuted Now to the third He hath promised the Popes Holiness not to admit any other Religion but his in any part of his kingdoms or Dominions How is his promise proved What ground hath it Upon what Reasons standeth it He is in some manner subject unto the Pope Be it he holdeth all or most of his kingdoms and dominions of him Let it be so he beareth the title of the Catholick king as an especial gift from him or his Predecessors It shall not be denied Lastly it is he whose friendship and amity â—is father willed him to embrace and entertain this must also be granted But what of all this He may not break promise with his Holiness True if the promise be possible for no man is bound to things impossible And is this promise impossible It is or at least-wise like to a promise that standeth upon â—mpossibilities â—r whatsoever cannot be done by a Prince without offence â—o God without effusion of blood without ruin of his Estate and without manifest and great prejudice unto his honour and dignity that may in some respect be esteemed impossible and whosoever
Marcellus before Iulius Caesar he being the onely Judge and Arbitrator of his own cause And it was the custom of the first kings of Rome to hear all causes themselves as well concerning their subjects as themselves until that Servius Tullius the sixth king reserved all publick causes for his own audience and referred his own private matters unto the Senate There was nothing so great or so small saith Suetonius Tranquillus but Tiberius when he began to be weary of managing of publick affairs referred the same unto his Senators And so did Marcus Antonius as Capitolinus testifieth But after that Princes began to grow absolute after that their States became hereditary and they had established a certain order in Judgement then began they to have their Judges who sat as their substitutues as well in other mens as in their own causes as Choppianus reporteth And although they appoint such Judges yet they wrong not their Subjects therein because both they themselves vouchsafe to swear to see their Laws maintained and their Judges are sworn to Judge according unto their Laws But our Queens Majesty was not Judge in the Scotish Queens cause It pleased her to make the high Court of Parliament judge thereof What wrong then was there offered unto her since she had the same Trial which many Kings of England have had As namely Richard the second and third and Henry the fourth and sixth She had not the favour which was shewed unto Subjects or Strangers She should have had a Jury of Twelve Peers to pass on her whereof the one half should have been Englishmen and the other Scots or other strangers This in truth is the usuall and ordinary manner of Tryal for strangers offending within the Queen Dominions But where should such strangers have been had but that they would have been partial on the one side or on the other what course might have been taken for their coming into England And when they were come if she had made as she might have done any manner of exception against them had it not been dangerous to stay the coming of others Had it not been costly to have defrayed their Charges And who should have born their charges The strangers themselves would not have been at the cost The Scotish Queen was not able to maintain them And there was no reason to put her Majesty to such charges It may be that the Spanish King would have been content to have paid their charges Let it be granted yea and those whom he would have sent would have saved her life because they durst not displease him and he must needs have gratified her because she had as she confessed sold unto him her pretensive Right unto the Crown of England Is it likely that six Peers of our Realm would have spared her when six and thirty of the chiefest of our Nobility and of the most discreet Judges and Lawyers of our Realm found her guilty and the whole Parliament condemned her In which Parliament by reason of the Priviledges and Liberties thereof any man might have spoken more freely in her defence then in any other place And was it not seen that before she had endeavoured by so many wayes and means as she did to take away our most gratious Soveraigns life and Scepter that very mean men presumed to speak for her in the Parliament House and were heard with all favour and indifferency And if she had been saved by the Spaniards benefit would he not have used her to our destruction And should not we have lived in continual servitude then which nothing is more grievous unto a good minde nothing more contrary and repugnant unto the nature and quality of a Prince May it be thought that that King who objected unto our Queen in a most disdainfull and dispightfull manner that he had saved her life and that her Majesty was bound unto him for the same when as indeed there was no cause why she should have ever have been in danger to lose her life May it be thought I say that he wouâ—d not have done the like unto the Scotish Queen if she had not been alwayes at his disposition But it was strange that a Prince should be put to death It was not strange in Scotland where more Kings have been slain and murthered then have died a natural death where Alphinus not onely King of Scots but also Heir unto the Kingdom of the Picts was openly beheaded It was not strange in Hungary where Queen Ioan was executed for the murther committed on the person of her Husband It was not strange in France where Bernard King of Italy and lawful King of France was adjudged and done to death It was not strange in Asia where Hercules slew Laomedon for his tyranny and cruelty It was not strange in Spain where Henry the Bastard executed Peter the lawful King It was not strange in the kingdom of Naples where Conrad rightful King thereof was beheaded Briefly it was not strange in the holy Scripâ—ures where we read that Ioshuah discomfited five Kings and hung them all upon trees that Saul was reprehended by Samuel for not kiling Agag King of the Amalakites whom Samuel took and hewed in peeces that Gideon slew the Kings of Midian and that Iehu slew Iehoram King of Israel and Ahaziah King of Iudah There is nothing then strange or without example in the execution of the Scotish Queen unless it be strange that our Queens Majesty was careless of her life when her Subject were careful of the same that she would not hear of her death when they desired nothing more then her death That when the Parliament had condemned her she could not be in treated to subscribe to their Judgment Briefly That when with great labour and many perswasions she was won by her privy Councel and others who were of opinion that Vita Mariae would be Mors Elizabethae as Vita Conradini was thought by the Pope to be Mors Caroli to deliver her Warrant to one of her Secretaries for her death she imprisoned and grievously fined that Secretaryfor sending that Warrant with such speed as he did whereby it seemed that had not the Warrant been obtained when it was she would hardly have yeeled to her execution and by punishing him that was so willing and ready to have her executed it appeareth that her Majesty not onely loved her whilst she lived but also after she was dead and her Highness grave and wise speeches delivered unto her loving Subjects in the Parliament House do testifie how sorrowful and unwilling her Majesty was to consent unto her death although it was there made most apparent unto her Grace that as long as that Queen lived she could not be without continual danger of losing her life This opinion being therefore confirmed to be most true since her death because there have no such Treasons been either intended or practised against her Majesty since as before that time It followeth that her execution gave
we hardly change our opinons and yet when we have changed we stand stiff and obstinate in our new and late received conceits and are very hardly removed from them Insomuch that whatsoever the Childe receiveth from his Father or whatsoever the Grandfather teacheth the Grandchildren that seemeth to be irremoveable and subject to no kinde of alteration A man may therefore boldly say yea swear that the Spaniard let him try all the means he can possible shall never inforce a general change in Religion For since his Father whose power although he should surpass yet he shall never match him in good fortune could not constrain the Protestants in the very infancy of Religion to return unto his profession is it credible that the Son should ever be able to compel far and remote Nations mighty and great Princes manly and warlike people which of late years have forsaken Popery to reassume their old opinions But if any man think him great sufficient and mighty enough to effect his disire let that man consider how many how noble and how learned men the cruel War of Charls the Fifth against the Protestants in Germany the most barbarous cruelty of Francis the First against them in France the bloody five years persecution of Queen Mary in England the Spanish Kings terrible and horrible Inquisition in Spain Italy and Flanders lastly the most execrable and hateful Massacre of Paris hath sent headlong and before their times unto another World And when he hath considered all these let him likewise remember that the more these Tyrants murthered the more the Protestants as though others sprang out of their blood encreased daily If all these shall not content and satisfie him let him call to mind how many years the Wars continued in France and Flanders for Religion with far greater obstinacy then with good success and happiness Lastly Let that man weigh with himself how unlikely a thing it is for the Spaniard to prevail against so many Nations who in almost Thirty years continuance hath not been able to replant his own Religion in a few Provinces of one Nation Besides the rare success and the wondrous events that have alwayes followed the Proâ—estants make me beleeve that their Cause is a good Cause and whosoever so beleeveth must likewise beleeve that were their number smaller their Forces weakerâ— their exprience far more slender then it is yet God that can win with a few as well as with many with the weak as well as with the strong will not onely protect them but also confound their Adversaries How many examples find we in prophane Histories which record that small sroops have oftentimes subdued great Armies and that mighty Kings have been put to flight by weak Princes How can we then but think that the Protestants who are Gods Souldiers who fight in his Cause and are defended by his Forces are able to beard the proud Spainard yea to brave and foil all his Confederates It is no small comfort to have God on our â—ide It is a geat Consolation to sight in a good cause And who can desire better advantage then to contend with and Adversary that beginneth to decline that is ready of himself to fall And is not the Pope and his Kingdom in this case Have not many Nations as I said said long since shaken off the intolerable burthen of his grievous yoke and bondage And do not all States when they begin once to decline sooner fall from the half way towards the end and to their utter destruction then from the beginning of their first declination unto the middest of their downfull Shall not those then that seek to defend Popery do even as a Physitian doth when he laboureth to preserve a very weak and old man from the danger of death Hath not St. Paul said that Antichrist shall perish as soon as he beginneth to be known And if God by the mouth of St. Paul hath pronounced this Judgement this Sentence against him who either can or will be able to prevent or hinder the execution thereof He is now no more able to encounter with Henries Othons and Fredericks great and mighty Emperors He hath no more Kings of France to fight in his quarrels No more Kings of England to be Defenders of his Faith No more Switzers to be Protectors of his Church all these have forsaken him and by Example of these many other Princes have learned not to set a Fig by him Thus the First point is cleared now it remaineth to clear the second and to make it appear that the Spanâ—ard although he could yet he should not constrain his Subjects by force of Armes to change their Religion This point although it hath been already touched in some manner yet it was not so sufficiently handled but that it needeth a more ample Declaration For the better understanding therefore of this Question you shall understand that the Common people which are Princes Subjects never did and particular men although they change their lives yet they leave most commonly behinde them their posterity and their Children which succeed them not onely in their Lands and Inheritances but also in their quarrels and affections Insomuch that there dieth scant any man so bad so wicked so unbeloved but that he leaveth behinde him either children kinsmen or friends who will not onely be sorry for his death but also revenge the same if he chance to be violently or wrongfully put to death This appeareth by the Wars of France and Flanders This appeared most evidently by the Bloody and long Civil contentions that were betwixt Lewis the last Earl of Flanders for after his death the Earldom fell to the House of Burgondy as it did after the death of the County Charles unto the house of Austria and the Citizens of Gaunt who after that they had unadvisedly born arms against their said Earl and began to repent themselves of their folly most humbly intreated the Dutchesse of Brabant the Bishop of Leige and other Noble men to be Mediators of a friendly peace betwixt them and their Earl The Dutchesse and the rest became humble Suitors for the poor Gantois the Earl was obstinate and would not yeeld to their Request unless the Inhabitants of Gaunt would be content to meet him at a place appointed bare-headed and bare-footed with halters about their necks and there ask him pardon and forgiveness which being done he would then pardon them if he thought good The rich Citizens hearing these hard conditions and considering that when they had made this humble submission it was doubtfull and uncertain whether they should be pardoned or no of humble Suitors became most desperate Rebels and as Men careless of their lives resolved rather to die then to yeeld to so unreasonable conditions and with this resolution before they were constrained to leave their Town not above Five Thousand of them issued out of the City and as roaving Wolves seeking for their prey went in a great