altogether needfull in our reading this chapter to carry along in our eye the main scope and designe of the Apostle in what he here writes to this people which was in a direct line to prove his grand thesis namely justification by faith without the deeds of the law and therein this Chapter carries a compleat analogy with the former and two following Chapters of this Epiâ—le the grand scope of all which is to convince the Jew of his sin in not believing in Jesus Christ for life and salvation The Apostle in this Epistle and Chapter had an eye to the Jews great Argument with respect to the covenant made with Abraham which argument is by them formed thus if not any be justified but by faith in Christ then the Jews though the natural seed of Abraham are not justified but are in the state of condemnation for they hate Christ have persecuted and slayn him but it is absurd to conclude that the Jews are not justified therefore man may be justifyed some other way then by believing in Christ and the Minor of this argument is strengthened by a three-fold fortification which the Jews think impregnable As first say they to the seed of Abraham was the promise made and if they be not justified then there is a failing in Gods word Secondly there are not any amongst all the sons of men so zealous for righteousness therefore they must needs be the persons justified Thirdly say they if they be not justified then hath God cast off his own people which he hath chosen But these things cannot be so therefore this doctrine of justification by faith in Christ must be a doctrine of Pauls devising and not the truth of God Now my souls desire and prayer to God is that the truth in this Scripture might clearly shine into the hearts of all that are sincere who shall reade the ensuing matter and that which I designe as I go along shall be to discharge this Scripture from that hard service which it is prest to serve in which is to attest a personal absolute Election and reprobation unchangeable and irrevocable establisht before the foundation of the world which preordination of God doth unavoydably necessitate men to be what they are and shall be as to sin and death Righteousness and life which inference and conclusion will appear very forreign to the Apostles designe in this Chapter CHAP. I. Personal Reprobation Reprobated Wherein is contained what reall great and constant sorrow the holy Apostle St. Paul had for the miserable estate of the Jews under their sin of blindness Vers 1. I say the truth in Christ I lye not my conscience also bearing me witness in the holy Ghost IT may be easily and readily supposed that the Apostle had here to do with a people who partly through prejudice to the persons and partly his doctrine were likely to be hardly perswaded that Paul had affection for them that he had in his heart secret hatred and revenge against them for those injuries done to him and therefore he is necessitated to take great pains to raise and beget in them a credit of his choyce love and affection to them which he labours after in the beginning of this Chapter these 5 first verses contains the proem or preface to the Chapter In which preface we have the Apostles most ardent and patheticall complaint and manifestation of sorrow in the behalf of he Jews his countreymen who were not only ignorant but persecutors of Christ and his Gospel which rendred them in the Apostles judgement in a very sad and deplorable condition Now these five verses are two ways understood First some understand them to look backward to what the Apostle had been treating on before 〈◊〉 the former Chapter in which he had been treating of the choyce priviledges of such as were believeâ— in Christ that they were not lyable to condemnation that they were chosen of God had the spirit were heirs of God joynt-heirs with Christ and that nothing should be able to separate them from this their happy estate some I say do judge that the Apostle having been deeply contemplating upon these things breaks forth passionately and abruptly with these affection at lamentations for those his Countreymen who for the generallity of them lay short and at a distance from these priviledges Secondly there are others who understand these verses as a preface to what follows in this Chapter and as a preparative to what he had to say which I think is the likelyest to agree to truth and I shall handle them as so understood and that great truth which the Apostle takes such pains to fasten upon their hearts was this that he had a cordial and deep sence of the present state of the Jews and their condition even to exquisite sorrow and grief In which sorrow we have four circumstances considerable First the certainty of it Secondly The greatness of it Thirdly the cause of it Fourthly the heightning circumstances of this sorrow which are two 1. The Jews are his kindred 2. They were such who had been invested with very great priviledges of each of these a few words in order First the Apostle is very pathetical in this his â—ttestation of the truth of this his sorrow he doth with much earnestness assure them that he had such a simpathy with them and sorrow with them â—e would command their belief iâ— this point and therefore doth he make a solemn and sacred protestation and profession in these words I say the truth in Christ I lye not The certainty of this which the Apostle speaks is two ways confirmed First by his positive attestation I say the truth in Christ Secondly by his duplication or doubling his speech on the negative as well as the affirmative I lye not These words of our Apostle are read two ways some reade instead of in by Christ not as we reade here as Paul having an eye to Christ as a witness as if he should say Christ thou knowest that I say nothing but truth that my sorrow is real and so also doth my conscience bear witness and so doth the spirit of God also in this matter and that this is the dialect of the Apostle see elsewhere Gal. 1.10 now the things which I write unto you behold before God I lye not so also 2 Corinth 11.31 the God and father of our Lord Jesus Christ knoweth that I lye not I appeal to him that I lye not as here But 2dly the most both of antient and latter Interpreters understands and reades these words of the Apostle otherways as containing in them the nature and force of an oath because the particle translated in say they may be more properly translated by and so saith Calvin Piscator and Musculus and so they reade those words 2 Cor. 12.1 I knew a man by Christ and of the same minde are most of our latter writers who also takes these words as an asseveration or an oath but take it
of the flesh are understood to be such as look for justification and acceptance with God upon the account of the works of the law circumcision and Obedience to the ceremonial law this is plain for flesh and works of the law are often taken one for another and by this our Apostle Rom. 4.1,2 what shall we say then that Abraham our father according to the flesh hath found for if Abraham were justified by works that which is called flesh in the first part of the verse is called works in the latter part this is understood Gal. 3.3 of being made perfect by the flesh and so chap. 4.29 he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the spirit that is he that was born according to the works of the law and thus S. Paul must be understood Phil. 3. though he was circumcised and kept the law yet he had no confidence in the flesh now in this third sense must our text be understood the children of the flesh are not the children of God Adoption and heirship doth not come in that way they that have nothing else to plead must stand off let us take it in which sense we will the text is here the children of the flesh are not the children of God 1. Such as have only nature Nor 2ly those who live after the flesh though they profess to believe in Christ Nor 3dly those who are most circumspect as to the observation of the law except they believe in and obey Jesus Christ Secondly who are the Children of the promise unto whom these are opposed By children of the promise must be understood such as rest and depend upon the free promise of God in Christ for life and salvation believers in Christ who seek for acceptance and salvation by him alone such as are begotten to love and obedience by the power of the promises To this doth the Apostles words agree Such as are Christs are the seed and heirs according to the promises therefore doth the Apostle oppose the Law to the promise Gal. 3.18 For if the inheritance be of the Law it is no more of the promises but God gave it to Abraham by promise So also Gal. 4.14 if they that are of the law be heirs their faith is made void and the promise of none effect the Gospel is a dispensation of promises and consequently of faith S. Paul calleth the Saints Heb. 6.17 the heirs of promises So also Gal. 4.28 We as Isaac are children of the promises So that when the Apostle saith here the Children are counted for the seed he intends not others then true believers in Christ Jesus Thus I have briefly answered these two Questions in order to the explication of the words I shall now summary the first part of the words into this Doctrine Doct. That the true seed of Abraham are not nor were not at any time estimated or accounted as they were found in the external profession or practice of Ordinances though of Gods own appointment but of such who under such Ordinances had the life and power of them in their hearts The true heirs of justification and salvation were in all ages intended to be inwardly and believinâ—…y children of God God did never accept of any outside professors since the beginning but as he was a searcher of hearts allways so he allways required heart and inside-worship he did always require to be worshipped with heart soul and strength In Abels time Cain was a worshiper as well as Abel but the difference lay in the inside of the worship therefore it is said Heb. 11.4 by faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice then Cain In the time of Circumcision God was not satisfyed with a fleshly circumcision only but God calls for circumcision of heart Deut. 10.16 circumcise therefore the foreskin of your hearts and we see the severe threatnings of God against Israel for the want hereof Ierem. 9. Inward spiritual worship was always required and much more in Gospel-days therefore Christ tells the Jews John 6.53 Except you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood ye have no life in you Rom. 2.28 he is not a Jew who is such outwardly God almighty was so cautious and careful lest men should bear upon works for Justification and acceptance with him thereupon that he declares Abraham justified before he was circumcised and that our Apostle takes special notice of Rom. 4.11 Abraham received circumcision a seal of the righteousnesse of the faith which he had being not yet circumcised to which agreeth these words verse the 5. now to him that worketh not but believeth in him that Iustifieth the ungodly his faith is accounted to him for righteousnesse so that it is plain that the spirit of God is greatly concerned in beating men off from bearing upon works of righteousnesse and we see the spirit of St Eaul to this purpose Titus 3.5 not by works of righteousnesse that we have done but according to his mercy he saved us This Doct. seems to discover to us a great mistake amongst professors in this day there are but a sew who do not erre on this hand to bear upon their external obedience to ordinances and raise their comforts and hopes from thence Is not this like the plea of the pharisee Luke 18. I fast twice in the weeâ— are there not many who bless themselves upon this account and this appears because your comforts are high and low according to your duties but some may say ought it not so to be I answer you must have a special care to keep allways in a clear sight and sense and assurance of your relation you stand in to God if you are truly regenerated persons and are begotten from above do not easily let go that hold it is the duty of a child to grieve that he hath offended his loving father but not to call in question his relation to him thereupon God doth not unchilde for every fault nor for many sins if they be not wilfully committed but I pray mistake me not I would not have Gods children passe lightly over their miscarriages against him nor their unanswerable returns to him but mourn cordially as David and Peter did not in slavish but filial frame of spirit but know this that our sanctification is not the ground of our justification but the Demonstration of it good works may demonstrate our justification 2. Let each of us be instructed from hence to have a special care that we do not bear or rest upon our Gospel-obedience for acceptance or justification namely our Baptism nor other gospelobedience in ordinances for this we may be assured of as a truth that if legal performances of Godâ— appointment were not accepted being only outward much less are gospel persormances in ordinances acceptable without the spiritual part of them Baptism hath an inside as well as circumcision which consists in two parts death to sin life to righteousness now if
he that rules is loved he 〈◊〉 serves in this sense is hated for this prophecy of Malachi is counted by our Apostle for a threefold illustration and explication of Gen. 25.23 1. More particularly to distinguish who and what those nations and people are of whom God speaks to Rebecca for in Gen. 25. we have it only laid down in general and comprehensively two nations two manner of people here we have it explained to be Israel and Edom these are the two sorts of people 2. To certify the Jews that the servtude of Esau to Jacob was the fruit of a defect of love in God to him Esau have I hated for we have nothing of hatred exprest Gen. 25. only their state is there exprest 3. Malachi gives the reason of this servitude which is not spoken unto Gen. 25. it is as they are the border of wickedness and so the people against whom the Lord hath indignation for ever Jacob have I loved and Esau have I hated these few words require to be plainly and fully spoken unto because they are very much wrested and wronged to the great disparagement if not to the overthrow of Gods free and impartial love to mankinde are not these the inferences drawn from these words That by love here in this text is to be understooâ— election to eternal life and by hatred reprobation to hell-torments and that the time of the commencement of this is from eternity before the persons are born or have done good or evill so that God elects and reprobates loves and hates without any respect to works good or evil therefore do they reade these words in conjunction before they were born or had done goad or evil one was hated and the other beloved or one elected and the other reprobated and that at the meer pleasure and purpose of Gods will and that these two persons by name are as leading examples or types of 〈◊〉 kinde and that when God hath set this love or 〈◊〉 tred it is for ever without any revocation no the one side or the other Now as the Lord shall assist I take it my proper work to labour to discharge this portion oâ— Scripture from that hard service in which it is â—… unwillingly prest to serve contrary to its genuine sence the which I shall do by inquiring into these Eight circumstances following 1. What is the nature of this hatred in God 2. Doth God hate any man without a cause 3. Whether the first transgression of Adam is the cause that God takes up against mankinde to haâ—… them 4. What is the cause that doth provoke God against any people to hate them 5. What are the effects of Gods hatred against any people when conceived 6. Whether we can finde ground from hence or elsewhere to believe that God doth hate parriâ—…lar persons 7. Whether Gods love or hatred to a people be irrevokable and unchangeable 8. How doth such an understanding of our â—postle accommodate his scope and designe in thâ—… contaxt First Hatred in Scripture is taken two ways 1. Positively and absolutely in a strict sence 2. Comparatively in a milde and lower senâ—… 1. Hatred is taken sometimes in a proper 〈◊〉 positive sence to detest and abhor to standing from and seek destruction of thus Cain hateâ— Abel such a hatred is in conjunction with malicâ— and envy thus Ahab hated Micaiah when 〈◊〉 sought his life In this sence the Apostle must be understood Eph. 5. No man ever hated his own flesh but nourished and cherished it 2. Sometimes hatred is taken in a comparative and milde sence for lesse love this is called hatred In this sence Jacob hated Leah Gen. 29. which is there interpreted only for lesse love thus it is understood Deut. 21.15 Matt. 10.39 Luke 14. to hate father and mother and life that is to love them lesse then we love Christ and in this sence if we will take the opinion of the Learned who have left their opinions behinde them it is that there is no more in these words Esau have I hated that is in comparison of Jacob to whom I have given the land of Canaan whilst Esau hath only the barren Countrey of mount Seir. The Second Question to be spoken unto is this Doth God hate any without a cause I answer that as hatred may be either understood in a comparative sence and with respect to external and temporal dispensations it may sometimes be without a cause he may shew lesse love to one then to another in outward things without a cause this I spoke unto before from ver 11. but God doth never hate without a cause if hatred be understood as to a personal final and eternal state 3. Is Adams sin a sufficient cause taken up by God to hate his posterity I answer that hatred in God is not to be understood as a passion of mind but God is said to hate love or be angry as the effects appear now we may see Gods hatred to Adams posterity by the effects of it which is an irrevocable sentence of bodily death to the grave which hatred is plain without exceptions to all Adams posterity But 2ly If we speak of hatred as antecedaneous to Reprobation as to the second death I deaâ— any such hatred to be in God as to Adams posterity so understoed but the quite contrary See Psal 145.9 God is good to all and his tender mercys are over all his works and he swears Ezek. 33.11 that he hath no pleasure in the death of the wicked and consider in the Fall God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son for them Joh. 3. Rom. 5.8 God commended his love to us that whilst 〈◊〉 were enemies Christ died for us Thus love or hatred in our Text cannot be understood of such a love or hatred whereby either person or party are saved or damned Esau in his lineal posterity was not so hated as I have shewn already for many of them it will be granted were saved as Job and others of that race Fourthly What is the cause that doth provoke God to hate a people I answer Sin and therefore when God hates he renders a reason Psa 5.5 thou hatest the workers of iniquity Psal 11. he that loves violence his soul hates This is an undeniable truth that if God hate so as to reprobate to the second death it is for sin namely actual sin but God may hate in temporals without sin for he afflicts whom he loves Heb. 11. Esa 49. Gods carriages to Zion was as if he hated her whilst his love was to her Gods inward love and outward hate may stand together Fifthly What are the effects of Gods hatred I answer a privation of good and an infliction of evil is reckoned hatred in these Scriptures following Deut. 1.27 Esa 60.15 Jer. 12. Amos. â— 8 Ezek. 35. Hos 9.15 Sixthly Can it be proved that God hates particular persons that God hates things and people is plain Zech. 8.17 I answer that
4.21.22.23 but with this proviso if he did not let his first-born Israel go even so he bids Moses to let Pharaoh know in like manner if he did not let them go he would harden his heart to his own destruction I will punish his natural and his acquired hardnesse with judicial hardnesse the sum of which is to punish sin with sin as God threatens Ephraim Hose 8.11 because he made many altars to sin altars should be to him for sin that is God would give up Ephraim to that sin he delighted and that is usual for God to foretel his judgments before he execute them see concerning the old world Gen. 6. an end of all flesh is before me I will destroy men yet after God had determined to destroy men he waits a 120 years so as to the destruction of Jerusalem he gives 40. years to try them so after he had resolved conditionally to harden Pharaoh he stays a considerable while till he had hardened himself and rebelled against him with a high hand under six plagues and that the threatning given out chap. 4.21 refers to this time and latter hardening appeareth if we will consider chap. 8.29 where we have that special warning ver 29. such as we finde not before let not Pharaoh deal deceitfully any more implying that Pharaoh had dealt deceitfully before had promised and not performed and it is emphatically added Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also Now after these six plagues and Pharaohs six hardenings on his side we have this emphatical threatning chap. 9.14 I will at this time or turn pour out all my plagues upon thy heart which some understand of his hardening by God so that this second hardening by God is the fruit and effect of his voluntary and obstinate hardening himself before Now in speaking to this second sort of hardening it will be needful to enquire into the difference between the second and first seeing God is concerned in both either accidentally or intentially it hath already been made plain that God did gradually harden Pharaohs heart by his former applycations unto him but what did God do more now then before to Pharaoh from whence it is now said God hardened his heart whereas before it is said Pharaah hardened his own heart I answer as to the negative part it hath been spoken unto under the former head that God doth not do any thing positively much less forcibly to make the heart hard neither doth he infuse any hardening quallity whereby he hardens soft hearts but that which we are to understand as to matter of fact on Gods side is this that God doth harden by withdrawing those influences of his spirit that should soften as withdrawing the sun makes the earth dark the Naturallists tells us that hardening is occasioned in a natural way by withdrawing the moisture out of any body or substance whereby it is condenst and made hard and stiff and unyeilding to the touch as the earth also becomes hard like iron by the withholding its moisture by showrs Thus withdrawing of the influences of Gods spirit makes the soul dark and hard it seems to be supposed and granted in Scripture that the spirit of God attends men ordinarily in striving with them as they are considered in a general capacity by which means they are not so bad as otherwise they would be Gen. 6. my spirit shall not always strive with men it had strived and would yet strive but not always strive so that the wicked old world had this means the spirit and whereas we reade the spirit shall not always strive with men the greek turns it my spirit shall not always continue with these men it was one of the blessings that God bestowed upon rebellious Israel a long while in the wildernesse that his spirit was with them Nehem. 9.20 he gave them his good spirit to guide them till they grieved and rebelled against it this was the blessing which God intrusted Saul with whilst he was obedient 1 Sam. 16.14 but upon his disobedience God took his spirit from him and an evil spirit came on him in the room of it wicked men are attended with good motions of the spirit but for great sins God sometimes withdraws it from them and this withdrawing is called giving up persons see that eminent place Psal 81.11.12 they would not hearken so he gave them up or as Ainsworth reades he lot them go away in the perversenesse of their own hearts or to walk in their own counsels this was Pharaohs case he had grieved quenched rebelled against the motions of Gods spirit which had several times instigated him to be willing to let Israel go Now he is given up to follow his own will and counsel without controul I will pursue I will overtake I will divide the spoil Thus God is said to do with those wicked persons of which we reade Ro. 1.24 God gave them up he would possess them no longer now the fruits and effects of his giving up or withdrawing the spirit is very dreadful As first the fruits of it is a heavinesse and fatnesse of heart a very great indisposednesse of heart to hear what God or his servants shall speak to them for their own good this was the case with Elies sons for their horrible sin in causing Gods ordinances and sacrifices to stink 1 Sam. 2.25 they hearkened not to their fathers instructions because the Lord would slay them God as a judgment had shut their hearts from hearing such an effect we reade of to Rehoboham 1 Kings 12.15 he had no disposition to take the councel of the old men which would have been his safety but the young mens to his own ruine such an instance we have Deut. 2.30 therefore Pharaohs hardening his heart and not hearkening are put together all along The second effect of this judicial act of God is an implacable hatred to Gods most faithful servants who seeks their souls good when Saul had lost the spirit of God and the evil spirit was upon him he fought to kill David whom he was forced to say was more righteous then he 1 Sam. 16.17 cha 8.11 Saul cast a javelin at him with a designe to kill him whilst he was pleasing him with his musick it is considerable that after this hardning of Pharaoh Ex. 10.28 he forbids Moses to come any more into his presence upon pain of death see thou see my 〈◊〉 no more for in the day thou seest my face thou shalt dye this was the state of the hardned Jews Mat. â—… stoned one killed another yea Christ himself at last 3. Such a person hath no sence of sin when committed a judicial hardned sinner is insensible whereas a true-hearted person is sensible of the least sin and hath checks in his conscience upon that account the Apostle speaks of some 1 Tim. 4.2 who have their consciences seared with a hot iron and to the Ephes chap. 4.18 the Apostle speaks of some that are past feeling a hardned soul
then the old world for whom God was grieved at the heart and repented that he made man yet he strives with them by his spirit in the ministry of Noah a 120. years so also 2 Cron. 36.15 he had compassion after all that hardness contracted by them as appears by their abusing his prophets see Ezek. 12. we there reade of a rebellious house who had hardened themselves to a high degree having eyes and see not ears and hear not yet still God useth means with them and that with this proviso ver 13. it may be they will consider though they be a rebellious house God knew that they were not in an incapacity to consider and return such a hardened people are not debarred of means of consideration the wicked old world were in a capacity of returning to the last moment of the 120. years so long as the patience of God waited God waited after he is said to harden Pharaohs heart under four judgements more to provoke him to prevent his utter destruction and besides all this it appears Pharaoh was not put into an incapacity to repent because after all this hardning he did repent though it did not hold with him chap. 9.27 saith he God is righteous I and my people are wicked and however some may judge of this repentance had it been continued in and not repented of it would have saved Pharaoh from destruction so again cha 10.16 I have sinned against the Lord and against you So that God did not harden Pharaoh irrecoverably so as that it was impossible for him to repent neither was Israel so shut up after the death of Christ but that they might still repent for we reade of three thousand of them who were guilty of that great sin of killing Christ converted in one day Acts. 2. by Peters sermon and that they are not irrecoverably shut up by vertue of that sentence and that hardening and blinding judicially by God is granted of all sides for they shall yet in time have soft relenting hearts given them and their blinding and hardening is but temporal the first prophecy of it Esa 6. had in it an until and Rom. 11. they shall be grafted in again if they abide not still in unbelief and this must needs follow unlesse we grant that Pharaoh or the Jews had committed that unpardonable sin which I suppose none will say if this be so then let us take up this consideration by the way that if Pharaohs hardening was not irresistible nor irrecoverable how can Pharaohs hardening be a meet type of absolute personal irrecoverable reprobation except you will plead for a personal conditional reprobation seeing all these threatnings against Pharaoh are conditional if he do not repent to let Israel go 2. He was in a capacity to repent even under the worst hardening till his utter destruction so that Pharaohs case will not do that service that it is by most summoned to do in the point of personal and absolute irrecoverable reprobation but it may be objected doth not this arguing seem to lessen the judgement of Gods hardning Pharaâ—… heart as if it were not so great as indeed it is for if it be not irresistible nor irrecoverable how is there that dread in it I answer that notwithstanding what of this kinde can be said yet it is a great yea the greatest of all judgements that can be inflicted upon a person to be hardened by God and that for these five reasons First because this hardening by God is the fruit and effect of the highest provoking sin it is sin punished by sin to be given over to commit sin with despight which before he commited with regret and trouble but now with all greedynesse see Rom. 1.28 it is to be given up to a reprobate minde 2. This hardnesse of heart from God though there may be a possibility to withstand it or recover out of it yet know it is unspeakable hard next to an impossibility as it must needs follow for every act of impiety doth still harden more and more it was very hard for Pharaoh to attain to that degree of relenting which he did attain unto but yet more hard to keep it upon his heart custome in sin begets a second nature see 13. Jer. 23. can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard his spots no more can they learn to do good who are accustomed to do evil 3. No person so near so lyable and ready to fall into his own destruction as a hardened sinner he is very near to ruine who saith Job cha 9.4 hath hardened himself against God and prospered muchless can they think to prosper whom God hardens 4. To be hardened by God is the greatest of judgements because commonly it is the punishment of the abuse of mercy and no judgement so severe as that which follows the abuse of mercy 5. This hardening by God is a great judgement as it is a token of Gods highest displeasure see the woes that go along with it upon the Jews Mat. 23. that which yet remains in order to a close of the 17. and 18. verses is to sum up those Doctrines that flow from the words thus explicated which may be many but I shall but little more then name the most of them 1. From verse 17. for the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh from this preface this Doctrine offers it self to our consideration 1. Doctrine That the sayings of God are not less divine or authoritative because they are written The writing of Gods sayings doth not take away from them divine authority but they are as if God had spoken them at present by his own mouth The Apostle might as well have said God saith unto Pharaoh yet he chooseth to say the Scripture saith This Doctrine is very well worth our consideration in this day in which we are fallen but I shall but briefly touch it because I spoke something to it in the explication it is plain these words were spoken by God Exo. 9. yet the Apostle referreth us to the Scripture and this is usual with the Apostle in other places see Gal. 4. the Scriptures saith cast out the bond woman though God spake it so 1. Timo. 5.18 the Scripture saith thou shalt not muzzel the mouth of the oxe whereas God spake it So that to say the Scripture saith and to say God saith are the same and indeed why should any body question the truth of this doctrine are the sayings of Kings and Monarchs of lesse authority because they are written and made into a law holy men appropriates that to the Scriptures that is proper to God himself as convincing converting clensing quickening they are able to make the man of God wise unto salvation 2 Timo. 3.15 able to build up and give an inheritance amongst them that are sanctified Act. 20. From hence we may note 1. That those that slight and undervalue the Scriptures are not guided by the same spirit that the Apostle Paul was there are some that will
to ver 21. But affirmatively there was a twofold framing or making upon the Jews at which they were much offended at God and both respecting Gods present dealings with them for their actual rebellion against the Gospel which was now judicially upon them 1. They were by God subjugated in their outward state to the Nations as to their outward glory and politick government wherein they had exceeded all the world besides Gods presence was in the midst of them his sanctuary was amongst them they were his first-born son the head and not the tail this people are now scattered amongst the Nations and their temple and glory laid in the dust they are made as a vessel in whom is no pleasure as it was prophesied of them Hos 8.8 and herein are a dishonourable vessel according to our Text this our Lord tells them Matth. 23. last their house is left desolate this formation they are greatly offended at why hast thou made me thus say they they are not sensible of any sin of theirs that could deserve this forming nay they questioned whether God had power or right to thus make them contrary to his promise made to their fathers Abraham Isaac and Jacob. 2. They took themselves wronged as we may perceive that God had put them out of a capacity of obtaining justification or salvation by all their zeal and legal obedience whilst enemies rejecters of Jesus Christ they are threatned with eternal death if they do not believe in Jesus Christ ye shall die in your sins notwithstanding all your legal obedience if you believe not that I am he why hast thou made me thus that is put me into this capacity Now the great designe of the Apostle is still to maintain Gods unquestionable right of power to turn a disobedient people into what form he please when they have first abas't themselves by rebellion he still carries on the same conclusion be hardens whom he will but according to promise I shall be brief upon this verse because I shall meet with it more fully and properly in the following verse that which remains according to our usual proceedings in order to concluding this verse is only to lay down those Doctrinal conclusions that offers themselves to us from these words 1. From the Apostles zealous replication I note 1. Doctrine That it is the nature of a true cordial faithful servant of God to have his zeal kindled when he hears Gods name and glory dishonoured and his attributes his wisdom power mercy and goodness abused This was the spirit of meek Moses Exo. 32.19 he brake the tables hereupon this was the spirit of Jobs friends when they saw but the least appearance hereof as they thought in Job So it was with Paul at the sight of Idolatry Act. 16. his spirit was stirred in him it is as it is with a dutyful childe to his father he cannot bear to see him dishonoured so David was sensible hereof Psal 42.10 as a sword in his bones Paul and Barnabas waxed bold Act. 13.46 when the Jews blasphemed see also Psal 44. so was Hezekiah upon the blasphemy of Rabshakeh 2 Kings 19. compared with Esa 37. From the designe of the Apostle to abase the Jews 2. Doctrine The great sin of the circumcised Jews was spiritual pride or pride of spirit This sin of pride in them God complains of old Hose 5.5 cha 7.10 their pride was testified to their face and to this our Apostle speaks Rom. 2. they made their boast they said we see John 9. 3. Doctrine It is a very high piece of presumption and impudence in man to question the reasonableness of the terms and conditions propounded by God in order to mans justification and salvation To say or think that there is a defect in Gods wisdom in propounding such or such a way rather then such this was the very case in hand and the great fault of the Jews this is very unreasonable so to reply it is but reasonable and equal that he that is sole author and donor of mans salvation should take his own way and propound his own terms upon which persons shall reap that benefit if God be about to bless Abraham with a great blessing to make him the father of the faithful he must follow God at his foot stoop to his directions in every thing as to the way to it the clay must yield to the hand of the potter if it will be a vessel of honour to this speaks Esaiah 40.13 cha 45.11 they must not command God 4. Doctrine It is very unreasonable and a high provoking sin against God for a poor finite creature who hath received his very being from him and who hath forfeited his very being a thousand times by sin yet to be found disputing and quarrelling'with God about the form of his being why he is not treated better by his maker As if a malefactor pardoned by the king should quarrel with him that he did not make him one of his bed chamber or confer some great honour upon him may not God do what he will with his own Mat. 20.7,8 5. Doctrine That the great dispute that the unbelieving Jews had with God was not about their original making or future rewarding but about their present handling called making The Jews question with God about the justness of his present judicial dispensations upon them why hast thou made me thus the truth of this will more clearly appear if we consult the context about this present hardning whom he will But I proceed to the next verse CHAP. XIII Explaining the potter and clay and that God makes and mars vessels according to their submission or rejection of him Ver. 21. Hath not the potter power over the clay of the same lump to make one vessel to honour and another to dishonour THese words are propounded by way of interrogation which kinde of speaking signifieth much intentness in the speaker and hath much awakening force upon the person unto whom spoken it is a kinde of speech much used by this Apostle both in this Epistle and elsewhere 2. This kinde of speaking supposeth a strong assumption and conclusion in the matter it self Hath not is as much as if he had said it is certain he hath it puts the question out of doubt we have the Apostle in these words further managing and manifesting his dislike of the former objection ver 19. and also further demonstrating the unreasonable perverseness of the said objecter giving yet a more clear account that God may harden whom he will and yet be just in finding fault or complaining of them so hardened by him which position is built upon this double principle 1. From his unquestionable right of power and prerogative 2. From this consideration that he hardens none but such as by their sin break or first mar in his hands when he is about to work them and soften them for vessels of honour or such as first are become clay of the vilest sort I need