of this sinne Heb. 6. 4. and 10. 26. 27. the Apostle calling it an apostasy or backslyding from God It is so also described 2. Pet. 2. 20. And 1. Io 5. 16. It is called a sinne vnto death As for the other kinds of this sin before specified some of them are consequently of this sin which we call a blasphemie and appertaine vnto it for desperation and final impenitency are the punishments of this sinne Obstinacie is in the very nature of this sinne for it caries with it an obstinate maliciousnesse And as for the other kinds I cannot see how they may be called sins against the holy Ghost for as for presumption what is it els but hypocrisie To Presumption repine at the graces of God in our brethren is a sinne against our neighbour and against the second table of the law Therefore let this rest that there is but one sin against the holy Ghost so called to wit the blasphemy against the holy Ghost or an apostasy from the grace of the spirit once receiued for these are one and the same to blaspheme against the holy Ghost and to fall from grace receiued Notwithstanding I deny not but that this sin which is but one in substance may haue his increase or growth for then it is come to a height when as it fighteth against all the known truth which is according to godlinesse Next we say that this one sinne is impardonable not for that it is seldome and hardly pardoned but for that it is neuer pardoned because such a one can neuer repent him of his sinne that he hath committed For this mans heart groweth to such a hardnesse and that by Gods iust iudgment as can neuer after be mollified And that this sin is simply impardonable is manifest by y e very words of the lord in y e gospel before cited for where it is sayd in Matth. it shall not be forgiuen him neither in this world nor in the world to come and in Mark This sinne is neuer forgiuen but is culpable of eternall damnation Do not these words cut off all hope of pardon So as I cannot but wonder at the Rhemists so impudently to extenuate Rhemists impudency 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the force of the words of the lord To the Heb. 6. he saith it is impossible that he which so sinneth should be renued by repentance then he addeth a waighty cause and most necessarie for sayth he This man crucifieth againe to himselfe the Sonne of God that is as much as in him lyeth Which point the better to conceiue it we must know there is a difference betweene all other sinnes and this sin against the holy Ghost as touching the remission and expiation of them For to expiat all other sinnes the sacrifice of Christ once offered is sufficient for them all and the vertue thereof extendeth it selfe to purge all sinnes for euer But when a man hath once sinned against the holy Ghost and profaned that pretious bloud the vertue thereof will neuer after be effectual for the expiation of his sin Wherefore he stands in neede of some new sacrifice to purge his sinne which thing shal neuer be granted him For if this were graunted then must Christ be crucified againe or some other sacrifice must be offered but neither can Christ be crucifyed againe neither can any other sacrifice bee offered for him as it is written Heb. 10. 26. For there remaineth no more sacrifice for sinnes Therefore this sin can neuer be expiat because a new sacrifice can neuer be giuen for it And this is the cause of the impossibility of the pardon of this sinne The aduersaries namely the Rhemists in their obseruations on this place do thus interpret this impossibilitie they say there is a double repentance or renuing or purging of sinne They say the first is easie and light in and by Baptisme where say they all the sinnes before Baptisme are purged by that light washing of baptisme The second they call penance or the purging of sinnes Popish sacrament of penanc as they say by the sacrament of Penance and in this Sacrament as they speake such sinnes are purged which are committed after baptisme and this is hard and painfull as consisting of fastings prayers satisfactions and other corporall afflictions If you graunt them this distinction then they say this impossibilitie of being renewed is in respect of that repentance renewing and purging of sinne which is in baptisme For they say it is impossible that a sinne committed after Baptisme some baptisme being iterated should be purged for we may not be rebaptized As for the latter penance and renewing they say there is a possibility in it For the greatest sinne after baptisme may be expiat by it Therefore they affirme the Apostle speakes couertly to such as sinne after baptisme sending them to the Sacrament of Penance that by vertue of that Sacrament their sinne may be expiat and that they may be renewed But by this their interpretation 2. Pet. 3. 16 they peruert the holy Scripture to their owne destruction For this is certaine that the Apostle here takes away all possibilitie of being renewed as the reason annexed manifestly proueth Finally it is euident by that place of Iohn before cited that this sinne is impardonable and that this is proper to that sin that it can by no meanes be pardoned For Iohn saith we may not pray for that sinne If we may not pray for it there is no hope of repentance or pardon for it I know what the Rhemists heere would say to wit that by this sinne vnto death we must vnderstand finall impenitencie finall impenitencie is not remitted because here wants repentance and therfore we may not pray for such a one after his death for he died in impenitency contemning the Sacrament of Penance But they affirme it to be lawfull to pray for other sinnes after death This againe is to peruert Scripture for the Apostle speaketh not of prayer to be or not to be after his death which hath so sinned but that prayer must not bee conceiued for him whilest he liueth after that it hath manifestly appeared vnto the church by infallible arguments that such a one hath sinned vnto death As for Iulian the Apostata for whom the Church prayed not while he liued yea it prayed against him in his life time after it was clearely discerned that hee had sinned vnto death that is had blasphemed against the holy Ghost I passe ouer that place of Peter before cited where the Apostle speakes of no difficultie but of a meere impossibilitie of being renewed of repentance and of remission of sinnes where it is said Their latter state is worse then the first and as it followeth but it hath happened vnto him as it is in the true prouerbe the dog hath returned to his owne vomit and the sow to her wallowing in the mire And thus farre of this second controuersie and so much shal suffice concerning sinne
vnder the couenant of works in respect of vs for being vnited to that diuine nature it is become a mediatour for vs to make intercession and peace betweene God offended and man offending For Christ our Mediatour albeit he be God and man in that personal vnion yet was he made subiect to the couenant of works and to the course of the law for vs properly in respect of his humane nature that as the Apostle speaketh he might redeeme vs from the law and the curse of the law See Gal. 4. 4. and 5. After that the fulnesse of time was come God sent his Sonne made of awoman made subiect to the lawe to redeeme them which vvere vnder the lawe And Galath 3. ver 13. But Christ saith he hath redeemed vs from the curse while he was made a curse for vs. Christ therefore our mediator subiected himselfe vnto the couenant of works and vnto the lawe for our sake and did both fulfill the condition of the couenant of works in his holy and good life euen in the highest degree of perfection as being God and man euen that most holy one of God in one person and also he did vndergoe that curse which was denounced against man in that couenant of works if that condition of good and holy works were not kept for in the couenant of works ye haue together with the promise of life to him who doth well a commination of euerlasting death to him who doth not well For this cause Christ our mediator both did wel according to the promise died also according to the curse denoūced Wherefore we see Christ in two respect to wit in doing suffring subiect to the couenant of works to haue most perfectly fulfilled it that for our sake whose mediator he is become It may be demaunded Had it not beene sufficient for our good and to the end he might redeeme vs if he had only liued well and holily and not also so to haue suffered death for vs I answer it had not sufficed for all his most holy righteous works had not satisfied the iustice and wrath of God for our sins nor merited the mercie of God reconciliatiō righteousnes life eternal for vs the reason is for that the iustice of God did require for our breach of Gods couenant that we should be punished with death eternall according to the condition denounced and annexed to the promise of that couenant Therefore no good works of our owne or of any Mediator for vs after the breach of that couenant of works could haue satisfied the iustice of God which of necessity after asort required the punishment and death of the offender or certainly of some mediator in his steed If then all the good holy works of the Mediator could not satisfie that wrath and iustice of God for sin it is cleere they could not meritany new grace or mercy of God for vs. But you will say that the good and holy works of Christ our Mediatour haue wrought some part at least of that satisfaction whereby Gods iustice was appeased for vs and some part of that merit whereby Gods fauour was purchased for vs I answer these works did serue properly for no part of satisfaction or merit for vs for that to speake properly the death of Christ and his passion onely did satisfie Gods iustice and merited his mercie for vs. If anie will yet further demaund May we not diuide the satisfaction and merit of Christ into his doings and suffrings that we may speake on this manner Christ by his death and passion hath satisfied Gods iustice and by his good and holy works he hath merited Gods mercie for vs that so satisfaction may bee ascribed to his death and merit to his workes that the righteousnesse wherewith wee are iustified before God may bee partly the satisfaction which Christ perfourmed by his death for vs partly the merits which he obtained by his works for vs I answer to speake properly the satisfaction and merit which is by the only passion of Christ both He saith we are iustified only by the passiue righteousnesse of Christ was and is our righteousnesse or the satisfactorie and meritorious death of Christ or the satisfaction which was by Christs death or the merit of his death or the obedience of Christ as being obedient to his Father vnto the death the death also of the Crosse to bee short that iustice of Christ which he obtained when in his passion he satisfied his Fathers wrath this is our righteousnesse For we may say that either the death of Christ or his satisfaction or his merit or his obedience or his righteousnesse is imputed vnto vs for righteousnesse For all these are taken for one and the same thing But here it may bee replied If the works of Christ cannot properly procure for vs any satisfaction nor merit nor anie part of satisfaction or merit then it may bee demaunded What hath beene and what is the vse of Christs works or of his actiue obedience or of the obedience of his life I answer that the holinesse of the person The actiue obedience of Christ or the righteousnes and holinesse of his person and life how it is the ground of the satisfactorie and meritorious passion of Christ of Christ and of his natures diuine and humane and of his works is the verie ground or foundation of the satisfaction and merit which wee haue in the passion of Christ that is the excellencie and worthinesse of that person and of his works did cause that his passion was both satisfactorie and meritorious for if this person which suffered had not beene so holy and excellent as also his life so pure and godly it is most certaine that his passion could neither haue satisfied Gods wrath nor merited mercie for vs. For which cause the Apostle Heb. 7. 26. speaking of this ground of this meritorious passion of Christ saith that such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy blamelesse vndefiled separate from sinners and made higher then the heauens And thus farre of Christ and how hee may bee said to be vnder the couenant of works And that he was not vnder the couenant of grace the matter is so cleare that it needs no disputation For the couenant of grace was made in him and established in his bloud and the promise in the couenant of grace is made to them which were vniust and dead in sinne because of the breach of that couenant of works and lastly Christ not vnder the couenant of grace the condition in the couenant of grace is faith in Christ the mediator Wherfore if ye respect either the ground or condition or promise of the free couenant Christ can not be said to bee vnder it And thus farre of both couenants of them which are vnder the couenant of God either of works or of grace CHAP. V. A comparison of our iudgment and of the Aduersaries concerning both these
iustification which is by Christ onely by the grace of God only by faith only for al these haue one respect and purpose Obserue then here by the way what the palpable blindnesse of the Papists is in this cleere light of the Gospell Popish blindnes First they see not how nature is plainlie lost as touching sanctitie Secondly they know not the sole grace and mercie of God neither do they vnderstand what the excellency is of Christs merit Thirdly they perceiue not how that couenant of works is abolished to them which are in Christ as touching iustification Fourthly they conceiue not that the only couenant of grace is made with mankinde after the fall speciallie now after the incarnation of Christ in the Gospell and that vnto iustification and life eternall Fiftly they see not that the works of free will as they call them if there were any such to be duties only and testimonies of thankefulnesse according to the first institution of the couenant of works which be done by the strength of nature but ascribe some speciall meritorious vertue vnto them Wherefore we conclude concerning these men that albeit they be not iust of one minde with those old Iewes against whom the Apostle disputed in the Epistle to the Romans yet they hold much on their side striuing to defend that nature is in part good and holy so contending against the pure and only grace of God and to diuide iustification and The popish iustification mans saluation betweene Christ and Gods free grace the vertues and workes of nature whereas notwithstanding these two nature and grace can neuer stand together in the worke of our saluation For whosoeuer shall conioine or make a mixture of grace and nature in this matter shall quite ouerthrow and extinguish grace which either is alone or not at all as Rom. 11. 6. If it be of grace it is no more of works for otherwise grace were no more grace And in the Epistle to the Galathians he doth purposelie dispute against those Iewes which did couple together in the matter of iustification the guifts and works of nature with Christ with the grace of God and with the Gospell And these Iewes as I iudge the Papists seeme most to resemble I meane those Iewes against whom he wrote in the Epistle to the Galathians For in that other epistle to the Romans he disputeth against such Iewes as did openly deny Christ and reiect him but to the Galathians his disputation is against such Iewes as were not content with Christ only but would haue Christ and the law ioined together Thus far of the comparison betweene Paul and vs on the one side the old Iewes and the Papists on the other Now because it will be demanded what Paul thought of the works of regeneration and what we and what the aduersaries thinke also therefore I will touch this question in few wordes Here then some one will say did Paul then in that disputation to the Rom. and to the Galathians oppugne the works of grace and regeneration I answer Paules chiefe purpose in that disputation is against the works of nature which the Iewes thought to be holy and iust and also meritorious he did not reiect the works of regeneration as they be duties and testimonies of thankfulnesse vnto God but in that respect commends them Rom. 6. 7. 8. Chapters and in other places But as touching the cause of iustification he would not haue these workes as we call them of regeneration coupled with the grace of God or with Christ or with faith as anie cause or as part of anie meritorious cause of saluation To this purpose he saith Rom. 4. that Abraham himselfe being regenerate was not iustified before God by anie works of his regeneration And Rom. 6. hauing commended the works of sanctification in the end vers 23. where he attributeth death to the merit of sinne hee doth not there notwithstanding ascribe life eternall to the merit of the works or fruits of sanctification but when he had said that the wages of sin is death he doth clearely auouch it that eternall life is the free gift of God in Christ Iesu In which place if the Apostle had beene of this iudgement that the works of regeneration be in anie respect meritorious assuredly he would not so passe ouer the commendation of the works of regeneration specially for that this heere is principally intended Wherefore the Apostle to the Romans so reiecting the works of nature which the couenant of works requireth yet hee vnderstandeth also all kinds of workes morall and naturall going before grace and faith as also all ceremoniall works and the very fruits of regeneration which follow grace and faith that faith onely Christ only grace only may herein be all in all Thus far of S. Paules iudgment We at this day are of one and the same mind with the Apostle concerning works of regeneration Our aduersaries granting there be such works ascribe too much vnto them for they will not haue them to be duties and testimonies onely of thankfulnesse vnto God but also that they be meritorious causes of that iustification which they call the second iustification Again we are to remember that the aduersaries iudgment concerning works of regeneration is that they proceed not onely from infused grace and first iustice as they speake but also from nature and free-will which works together with that iustice in respect whereof also they account good works meritorious as was before The popish opinion of good works shewed so ascribing their good works in part to that their first grace and in part to free-will And thus farre of this comparison wherby it appeares whether we or our aduersaries haue the better or the more sound iudgment concerning both couenants of the grounds of both nature grace and Christ as also of the effect of both which we call mans iustification And lastly for that this is the most fundamentall point of true religion we may hereby discerne also whether we or the aduersaries haue the religion and worship of God the more purely soundly established amongst vs. CHAP. VI. Of the written Word or of the written Couenant of God THe word in both couenants was for a long time in the world euen from Adams time till Moses vnwritten deliuered as from hand to hand and continued by a liuelie voice for I passe ouer such matters as Ioseph recordes to be ingrauen in columnes before the floud as also the Apocryphals of Henoch And whē as in continuance of time corruptions grew by these traditions and the puritie of the doctrine of the couenant could not thus be preserued and y t God would no longer follow the former course onely he beganne in Moses time to ordaine and to publish another forme to wit this to preserue and to continue the puritie of the celestiall doctrine in written books approued and sealed by diuine authoritie and testimonie the more to commend his written word vnto men
of faith 167 31 The opinion of the aduersaries concerning faith 176 32 Of hope 191 33 Of Charitie or Loue. 198 34 Of Repentance 202 35 How farre a wicked man may proceede in repentance 210 36 What the iudgement of Papists is of repentance 213 37 Of mans free-will 216 38 Concerning the free grace of God 226 39 Of the meanes whereby God from the beginning hath reuealed both his couenants vnto mankinde 238 A TREATISE OF OVR EFfectuall Calling and of certaine common places of Theologie contained vnder it CHAP. 1. Of our effectuall Calling GOds effectual calling is that wherby God calleth out of darknesse into 1. God cals by his word preached his admirable light from the power of satan vnto God in Christ Iesu those whom hee knew from eternitie and predestinated vnto life of his meere fauor by the promulgation of the couenant of grace or preaching of the Gospell Such also as be called by the same grace of God answer 2. Man answers by beleeuing and beleeue in him through Iesus Christ This answer is of faith which is in verie truth the condition of the promise which is in the couenant of grace Wherefore our effectuall calling doth consist of the promise of the couenant which is vnder condition of faith and in faith also which is nothing els but the fulfilling of the condition Therefore there be two parts of our effectual calling the first is the outward calling of such as are predestinate Two parts of our effectual calling vnto life from darknesse vnto light and that of Gods meere grace and that I say by the publication of the couenant of grace or preaching of the Gospell The latter part is their inward faith wrought in them by the same grace and Spirit of God whereby they are conuerted from Sathan vnto God for I cannot see how this second part of our effectual calling can differ from faith it selfe In the first part of our effectual calling first we are to consider the persons calling called The person which calleth vs properly to speake is God himselfe for he only promiseth in his couenant calling those things which bee not as though they were Roman 4. ver 17. The persons called are they whom God knew before and hath predestinated vnto life for whom he hath predestinated them he hath called Rom. 8. Secondly in the first part of our effectuall calling the cause which moued God hereunto is his owne speciall grace for the cause of all Gods blessings vpon vs is in himselfe For as hee did predestinate vs in himselfe according to the good pleasure of his owne will Ephe. 1. 5. so hath hee called and iustified vs in himselfe and shall glorifie vs in himselfe to the praise of the glorie of his grace that all glorie may be wholy ascribed vnto him Thirdly we be to obserue the instrument of our vocation which is the couenant published Instrument of our vocation or the Gospell preached Fourthly in this former part of our effectuall calling we bee to consider the estate from which and the estate whereunto we be called The condition from which we be called is darknesse the power of Sathan and that miserable plight which is without Christ in sin and death The state whereunto we be called is light God himselfe and that blessed condition of man in Christ Hence it is euident that these common places of Diuinitie Of Gods word and of sinne and the miserie of mankind must bee referred to this argument of our effectuall calling as to a most generall head in religion In the second part of our effectuall calling these branches must be noted First that the cause wherefore we answer Gods calling or beleeue in God is Gods own grace which worketh in vs this faith by the holy Ghost which is giuen vs with his word For like as God of his meere grace calleth vs outwardly vnto himselfe so the same his grace and free loue in Iesus Christ kindleth this faith in vs whereby we answer his heauenly calling And in this 2. part of our calling which we say doth 2. Part of our calling faith consist in faith if we desire yet more deeply to search it there is a double grace or working of God in our hearts The 1. is whē he inlightneth vs by his holy spirit pouring a new a heauenly light into our mind before so blind as that it neither saw nor could see the things which doe belong to the Spirit of God 1. Cor. 2. 14. 15. The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishnesse vnto him neither can he know them In the wil which is altogether froward and quite fallen from God he worketh an vprightnesse and in all the affections a new holinesse Hence proceedes the new creature and that new man which is created after God in righteousnesse and true holinesse Ephe. 4. 24. The Papists call this first grace in the faith and work of the holy Ghost not the creation of any new creature which was not before but the stirring vp of some goodnesse and sanctitie which as they say was left in nature Free-will after the first fall of man which they call also free-will which they say was not quite lost in the fall but lessened and weakened But this free-will whereof they speake is in verie truth nothing els but that holinesse of nature and life of God and the spirituall light of man in his first creation and innocencie But of this more in place conuenient This they say then that after the fall man retained not only the faculties of his soule but also the holy qualities of those powers only hurt and weakened And this is that free-will which they say is quickned by Gods preuenting grace which they define to be an externall motion standing as it were without and beating at the doore of the heart In this first grace of God which we call a new creation of diuine qualities in the soule man standeth meere passiuely before God and as the materiall cause of Gods worke For in this first renewing of the soule of man what diuine vertues hath man to work with Gods Spirit or to helpe the worke of grace Yet we say not that man in this new birth is no more then a trunke or dead tree for that there is in man that so I may speake a passiue power to receiue that diuine grace and life of God as also the vse of reason which dead trees haue not The aduersaries say that in quickening of free-will there is a libertie or strength in it to reiect or to receiue that grace which they call preuenting grace Therefore they giue a fellow-working vnto grace and a fellow-working vnto freewil The second grace or the second worke of Gods spirit The action of faith in the second part of our effectuall calling or in faith is the verie act of faith or an action proceeding from this new creature the action of
benefite of iustification It may be heere demaunded whether the works of grace and regeneration as they are called haue not some place in the condition of the couenant of grace for all the good works of nature are hence excluded I answer that the very works of regeneration are not contained in the condition of the couenant of grace First for that the couenant of grace is made with the vniust and vnregenerate now how can their works be iust good Next in the couenant of grace both regeneration it selfe and all the holy fruits thereof are promised for in it all the benefits of Christ be promised the beleeuers Now then the promise of the couenant must necessarily differ from the condition of the couenant But this you will Obiection say It is euident that in many places of the new Testament that life eternall or as they say the reward of eternall life is often promised vnder the condition of good works that is the works of regeneration as 1. Timoth. 4. Godlinesse is profitable vnto all things hauing the promises both of this life and of the life to come Luke 14. It shall be repaid thee in the day of the resurrection of the iust Matth. 5. Your reward is great in heauen Matt. 19. He shall not lose his reward Gal. 6. Let vs not be wearie in weldoing for in due season we shall reape if we faint not Ephe. 6. Knowing this that what good soeuer euerie man doth that he shall receiue of the Lord. Heb. 6. The Lord is not vniust to forget your worke and the loue which ye ministred vnto the saints 2. Thess 1. 6. Notwithstanding it is a righteous thing with God to render affliction in like manner to them which afflict you and vnto you which are afflicted rest with vs. To these I answer In my Answer Three kinds of promises in the Gospell iudgment there are three distinct kinds of promises in the Gospell The first is the promise of the couenant of works wherein eternall life is promised vnder condition of works done by the strength of nature Thesecond is the promise of the couenant of grace which is propounded vnder condition of faith The third kind of promises are those particular and special promises which are to be referred to the couenant of grace found euery where in the Gospell and made vnder condition of the works of grace and regeneration These three kinds of promises differ first in conditiō next in propriety thirdly in subiect fourthly in end and vse First thē they differ in condition for y e promise in the First difference couenant of works is vnder condition of y e works of nature the strength therof In the couenant of grace the promise is vnder condition of faith in Christ In the promises which I cal particular or special promises there is a cōdition of works indeed but of the works of grace and regeneration and not of the works of nature or any naturall facultie Secondly these promises differ in proprietie for the promise in the couenant of workes is Second differēce meerely legall and requires the condition of works done only by the strength of nature commanded in the lawe and to be done according to the strict rule of Gods law and the works of nature or wrought by natural strength are properly called the works of the law Rom. 9. 32. And the promise in the couenant of grace is not legall but meerely Euangelicall for the condition here is not of any worke morall and naturall but of faith in Christ and of Christ himselfe to bee apprehended by faith Lastly those particular promises they are partly Euangelicall partly legall for the condition is of workes which proceed from grace and regeneration and therefore of such works as in regard of their originall may truly be called Euangelicall works but because the law morall is the rule of them in this respect they may also be called legall works Thirdly these promises differ in subiect because Third differēce the promise in the couenant of works is propounded to them which now after the breach of that first couenant of works lie dead in sins offences hauing notwithstanding Ephe. 2. 1. for the time no sense of sin nor death The promise in the couenant of grace is giuen to them which are also dead in sinnes and transgressions but hauing some feeling of sinne of death and of their owne miserie wrought in them by the law and legall couenant and as for those particular promises they are proposed to them which are alreadie iustified renewed by faith in Christ Lastly these promises differ in vse and end for the end of the couenant of works is that wretched sinners which 4. difference are void of sense of their sin and miserie may be awakened to feele and acknowledge their owne sinne and miserie that is as the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. 9. 10. that sinne may reuiue in them and that they may die that is they may feele that they be dead in sinnes and offences Of this vse of the law see Rom. 3. 19. 20. 11. 32. Gal. 3. 22. and 5. 23. This is the vse then of the couenant of works to worke in vs the sense of sinne and miserie and to prepare men to receiue grace Therefore the doctrine of the Gospell begins with the legall doctrine of works and of the lawe morall for the Gospell should preach and promise in vaine righteousnesse and life to the beleeuers if they were not first prepared by feeling their owne corruption and miserable condition to heare and receiue grace by the Gospell For this cause Christ himselfe first Matth. 5. 17. and after freeth and restoreth the law as pure from the leuen of the Pharisees expounding * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the perfection and exact seuerity thereof for this very cause that men by this light of the couenant of works law morall might acknowledge how miserable they be by nature and so might hereby bee prepared to embrace the couenant of Grace So did Christ prepare that rich young man which came vnto him to be schooled as hee made shew to entertaine the couenant of grace Wilt thou saith he enter into life Keepe the commandements Paul begins his doctrine in the Epistle to the Romans from the law and couenant of works and spends neere his three first chapters of his Epistle in this doctrine to this end that he might conclude all vnder sinne and condemnation and so might prepare men to the doctrine of grace which begins Rom. 3. 21. So Gal. 4. 21. he teacheth the Galathians that would be vnder the law as he speaketh their miserable seruitude which be in that condition and how at the last they are cast out of Gods kingdom for this verie cause that the Galathians renouncing all confidence in that righteousnesse which is by the law couenant of works might lay hold on that righteousnesse which is by faith and
end vse of the couenant of works is that men by it may be iustified and saued or otherwise condemned The couenant of works had this vse in Adam before his fall that Adam by it might be iustified and liue After the fall it hath the same vse in the vnregenerate elect and reprobate to wit to iustifie and saue them or to condemne them And for as much as it can not iustifie them because of their corruption Rom. 8. 3. it followeth that it must necessarilie condemne them And the verie vnbeleeuing and vnregenerat doe otherwhiles feele this condemnation in themselues Of this vse read Rom. 3. 19. where he sayth that by the law Euery mouth is stopped and made obnoxious to the condemnation of God And of the experience of this condemnation reade Rom. 7. 10. I saith he when the commandement came was dead that is condemned in my conscience so that I felt in my selfe present condemnation and death And albeit this first vse of the couenant of works be cōmon to al vnregenerat elect and reprobate yet this wants not some difference for in the elect the acknowledgmēt of sin and condemnation which they haue by the couenant of works is vnto them a preparatiue to imbrace the couenant of grace but in the reprobate it is the way to extream desperation Thus far of the first vse The second end of the couenant of works is this It 2. End of the couenant of works serues to driue on and to stir vp al beleeuers to march on forwardes in all faith and godlinesse This vse it hath I say in the regenerat who in the legall couenant or morall law doe desire principallie to behold as in a glasse euermore first the holinesse maiestie and iustice of God 1. The vse of the morall law to the beleeuers Ro. 7. 12. Therefore the law is holy and the commandement is holy iust good Next they see here that which they call the originall holines and iustice of man to wit 2. the same which was in the creation which is defined to consist of iustice holines and wisdome Thirdly they behold here that life eternall which was to follow that 3. first originall iustice Fourthly they see that corruption and vnrighteousnes which is now in nature after mans 4. fal but this they see by consequent as we say one contrary is discerned and knowen by another for while we consider first that infinit iustice of God next our original iustice which are properlie discerned by that glasse of Gods law and couenant of works by the light and brightnes of these I say we may take a view of the grosse darknes filthinesse and deformitie of our corrupt nature For this cause it is said Ro. 3. 20. By the law commeth the knowledg of fin Fiftly they see herein Gods wrath kindled against y t deformitie of nature so contrarie both to Gods iustice to mans original iustice For this cause it is said Rom. 1. The wrath of God is reuealed from heauen against all the vngodlines and vnrighteousnesse of men and Rom. 4. The law causeth wrath Sixtly and lastly they behold how present death followeth that wrath of God Ro. 1. 32. Which men though they knew the law of God how that they which commit such things are worthie of death yet not onelie doe the same but also fauour them that doe them Chap. 7. 9 10. When the commandement came I dyed The regenerate when they consider these things in the law and couenant of workes they are forthwith terrified with that heauie spectacle 1. of their sinne 2. of the wrath of God against sinne 3. of eternall death which followeth Gods wrath And then doe they more more relinquish and renounce 1. that legall righteousnes required in the couenant of workes 2. that originall iustice and all opinion of free-will 3. that life and safety which followeth that legal righteousnes of works And hauing renounced all confidence in these thinges with like in deuour they follow hard after Christ by conuersion and faith to this end that they may finde in him first that mercie of God in Christ contrarie to that iustice of God secondlie they seeke for that imputatiue iustice as they call it so contrarie to their owne righteousnes to that originall iustice of the law or of works Thirdly they labour for that sanctification and regeneration that so they may bring forth the fruites of the spirit Fourthly they waite for to attaine that life eternall which is giuen vs of Gods free grace in and by that imputed righteousnes of Christ If we were possest in this life of a perfect faith in Christ A perfect faith we haue not and so of perfect holines then I graunt the beleeuers should not need this terrible glasse of the law and of the couenant of works But because vnbeleefe still resteth in this our nature and the reliques of that inherent contagion still abide in vs and for that so long as wee liue here neither our faith nor holinesse can be perfected Therfore to weaken more more our vnbelcefe and inherent sinne in vs and more and more to increase faith and holinesse we haue euer need of this terrible glasse as a continuall seuere Schoolemaister which euer casting many feares before vs may driue vs to the faith of Christ and to sanctimonie of life Now then seeing it is euident that there is a double vse of the couenant of workes the answer to the question aforegoing is easie For this we auouch that as touching the former vse the couenant of works is abolished to them which are vnder grace To this the Apostle pointeth when he saith Ro. 6. 15. Yee are not vnder the law but vnder grace Gal. 4. that he might redeeme them which were vnder the law Rom. 7. Being dead to the law we are now free from the law 2. Cor. 3. 11. For if that which should be abolished was glorious But as for this second vse it is not abolished This distinction is commonlie receiued that the law legall couenant is abolished as it is a condemning tyrant and not to be abolished as it is a Schoolemaister to chasten vs and with terrours to driue vs vnto Christ For this second vse we haue an example in Paul after his regeneration Ro. 7. 14. c. For when he considers in the glasse of Gods law the spiritualitie that so I may speak the holines and goodnes of the law first next his owne carnalitie to vse that worde and rebellion and lastly death it selfe first he breaks forth into these wordes Miserable man that I am who shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Next he flieth to the mercie of God in Christ Iesu saying I giue God thanks in Christ Iesus And 2. Cor. 5. 11. Paul sayth of himselfe he was inforced and mooued forwardes to doe duties in his calling because of the terrors of the Lord set downe and offered vnto him in and by
which is done against Gods will is said properly to be done against Gods decree and not against his reuealed wil or expresse law but sinne as it is a transgression of the law is not done against any decree therefore sinne as it is a transgression of the lawe is not done against Gods will The Assumption is shewed because God decreed not from euerlasting that sinne as it is a transgression of his law should not be done of an euill instrument Therefore thou saist hee decreed that it should be done Answer It followeth not 1 For both these are true concerning God God hath neither decreed that transgression as it is transgression 2 should not be done neither hath he decreed that transgression in so farre as it is transgression should be done For there is no decree of God extant either in this or that respect touching sinne as it is a transgression or breach of the law of God But thou maist aske is not sinne effected as it is transgression some way by the permission of God Answ A thing is said to be done two wayes by Gods permission either by it selfe or by accident That which by Gods permission commeth to passe by it selfe must of necessitie respect and put on the nature of good seeing God proposeth and directeth the same vnto a good end but that which by an accident is done God permitting it or forsaking the creature nothing hindreth but that as it is such it is euill for God leauing the creature and euill instrument to it selfe the creature doth that which is euil as it is euil neither can it otherwise do being left of him who is the Author of al good But now in respect of God permitting and leauing that euill as it is euill is done by accident not by it selfe because God in forsaking purposed not euill as it is euill but on the contrarie so farre forth as it respecteth good and is a meane of his glorie of that especially which is the consequent of his mercie for all meanes whether wrought by God himselfe or suffered to be done of euill instruments in the first place are both ordained of God himselfe and directed to the glorie of his mercie arising from the saluation of the creature God hath shut vp all vnder sinne that he might haue mercie on all And in the second place for the hardnesse of man and because of the heart that cannot repent sinnes and euils which are done by an euill instrument serue to that glory which God getteth vnto himselfe by his iustice and iust punishments If on the contrarie thou obiect God suffereth sinne that he may punish the same but he punisheth sinne in Or I would answer the maior That God suffereth not sin to punish it for that he respecteth not but for that be hath a purpose to manifest his owne glorie in the punishment of sinne that it is sinne or transgression therefore he permitteth sinne as it is sinne I answer vnto the Assumption Sinne as punishment followes thereupon which in it selfe is good and turnes to the glorie of God in this sin I say hath not respect vnto euill but vnto good producing a good effect for an euill cause as it is euill cannot bring forth a good effect But if that cause which in it selfe is euill be also considered as the cause of a good effect it must needes in some sort take vnto it the nature of good I confesse indeed that sinne as it is sinne is the cause of punishment and the punishment as it is the effect of an euill cause must needs it selfe be euill And indeed punish ment Punishment in it selfe is euill which is inflicted is considered two wayes first as a thing in it selfe euill for there is some transgression How punishmēt is euill in euerie punishment and euery punishment after a sort is also a sinne Againe it is considered as a thing that is good to wit as a meane of Gods glorie This I say in a word that all meanes which in and by themselues are euill in respect of God propounding and of the end which is the glorie of God in some sort are good And that whole chaine of meanes which is betweene God propounding as the head and beginning and the glorie of God as the end is the order of things which either by themselues are good or at the least in some sort may be so accounted For those two extremes chaunge all darknesse after a sort into light CHAP. XXV Of Originall Sinne. THVS farre of sinne in generall the first diuision of sinne is into originall and actuall To speake of originall sinne first we be first to obserue the reason why it is so named It is called Originall sinne why so called original because it is in vs with vs from our first being conception and natiuity for it comes by propagation and is deriued from parents to children as an hereditary disease as a leprie the stone or any such like malady of the body And that there is such a kind of sinne it is most manifest for there is none so fottish and so voide of all sense that he feeleth not this hereditarie sicknes in himselfe as the infection and corruption of his nature But the holy Ghost who best knoweth what is in man doth cleerely auouch this in many scriptures Gen. 5. 3. When as Adam saith he begat a sonne according to his owne image Note heere the propagation of that corrupt image which was in Adam into his sonne Sheth Iob. 14. 5. Who can bring forth a cleane thing of an vncleane not one Behold here the propagation of vncleannes Psalm 51. 7. Behold I was formed in iniquitie and in sinne did my mother cherish * Tremel fouit kept me warme in hir bed mee Behold the sin which we haue from our mothers wombe Ioh. 3. 6. What is borne of the flesh is flesh Behold the propagation of flesh that is of our corrupt nature Rom. 5. 12. Like as by one man sinne entred into the world and by sin death c. Obserue here the propagation of sinne Eph. 2. 3. We were by nature the children of wrath Note here our corrupt nature and therefore how subiect it is to the wrath of God And thus far we see that there is a sin which we call originall Now let vs consider what the subiect thereof is The subiect of originall sinne is the whole man body and soule which thing is taught vs cleerely by that one name Soule infected with Orig. sin which is giuen it Ro. 6. 6. as els where that old man whereby nothing els is signified but the whole man corrupted or the corruption of the whole man That the minde is infected with this sin first we be taught it by very sense it selfe next by many testimonies of scriptures Genes 6. 5. When the Lord saw all the imaginations that is all the thoughts of his heart were only euill continually Gen. 8. 21. Albeit the
imagination of mans heart be euill from his youth Ephes 2. 3. Fulfill the will of the flesh and of the minde And that the body is infected with this poison see Rom. 6. 12. Let not sinne raigne in your mortall body And that euery The body and all the members poisoned with originall sinne one of the members is infected and poisoned with the same sin is shewed v. 13. Neither giue your members as instruments of vnrighteousnes vnto sin Againe the very names of this sinne shew the subiect thereof or where it resteth As when it is called flesh concupiscence the law of the members the body of sin the body of death And thus farre of the subiect of originall sinne Now wee bee to come to the parts of it and because it is as a compound thing we are to consider first The materiall cause of originall sinne threefold what the matter thereof is next what the forme The matter of originall sin is threefold The first part of the matter thereof is that apostasie wherein we fell all away from God in the loines of Adam This we receiue from our mothers womb for we are al born Apostates backsliders frō God For that the first apostasie was not Adams only but did appertaine to vs al first reasō it selfe may sufciently conuince it for we were all as then in his loynes and as parcelles of the substance and nature of the first man and so we all fell in him and with him from the liuing God For this very cause Heb. 7. Leui is said before he was borne to pay tithes to Melchisedeck because he was then in the loynes of Abraham Abrahams fact was therefore Leui his fact also and of all his posterity which then were in his loynes Next this is testified by scripture as by name in that place which is Rom. 5. 12. In whom to wit Adam all men haue sinned That first Apostasie I grant is past and vanished away as euery action passeth away yet after a sort it is saide to continue still for albeit the fact be past yet the How the Apostasie of Adam continueth still guilt thereof remaineth still for euery man is borne guilty by nature of that first Apostasie The same is to bee said of euery other sinne Murther Adultery Theft c. For whatsoeuer it is it may be truly sayd to remaine still so long as the guilt remaineth which is consequent thereunto Wherefore euery man is guilty of that first defection and falling from God vntill this guilt be taken away by the bloud of a mediator And that we be such Apostates by nature the scripture testifieth Rom. 5. 15. By the offence of one many be dead Wherefore many must be guilty that one offence Ro. 5. 16. The fault came of one offence vnto condemnation And thus farre of the first part of originall sinne that is of the first backsliding and our falling away which we bring forth with vs from our mothers wombe into the world The second part followeth of originall sinne which is a certaine defect or a certaine want of originall iustice Second part of Originall sinne that is of that righteousnes or integrity wherein man was created according to the image and example of the righteousnesse which is in God the creator For he created man after his owne image wise iust holy For the Apostle to the Eph. 5. and Col. saith that in these respects man was like to God himselfe in his creation This want I speake of originall iustice is the first effect of that apostasie before shewed For that apostasie whereof we are al by nature guilty depriueth vs in our first birth euē in our very conception of that originall iustice and image of God This part of the matter of originall sinne very sense sheweth and many scriptures testifie of it I meane such as speake of sinne negatiuelie or priuatiuelie For Proofe of our want of original iustice by 1. sense 2. by scripture all such places shew plainelie what defect is in vs and what want of originall iustice Rom. 3. 23. All haue sinned and are depriued of the glory of God Ro. 7 18. I know that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing And a little after I find no meanes to performe that which is good Rom. 8. 7. The wisdome of the flesh is not subiect to the law of God neither indeed can be 1. Cor. 14. The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God neither can he know the. 2. Cor. 3. 5. Not that we are sufficient of our selues to think any thing as of our selues Eph. 4. 18. Hauing their cogitation darkened and being strangers from the life of God And thus far of the 2. part of the matter of original sin to wit the want of originall iustice The third part followeth and this we say is an inclination The 3. part of the matter of originall sinne or quality contrary to that originall iustice and integritie before mentioned succeeding euen in place thereof This is that which they call our naturall corruption and it is the second effect of the apostasie of Adam in Paradice For that rebellion of our first parents first depriueth vs of originall iustice and of the image of God next in place there of by Gods iust iudgement it infecteth vs with a quality cleane contrary to that righteousnesse whereby we are made prone and apt to al euil This contratie qualitie or inclination vnto sin to be in vs very sense procues it with many testimonies of the holy Scripture all which speake of sinne affirmatiuely or that I may so speak positiuely Ro. 7. 7. I had not known concupiscence but that the law sayth thou shalt not couet Rom. 7. 23. I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my mind Eph. 2. 3. Fulfilling the lusts of the flesh and of the minde Ad to these the places before cited Gen. 6. and 8. And thus farre of the third part of the matter of originall sin And here as touching the want of iustice and inclination vnto sinne which were two parts of the matter of originall sinne ye must be aduertised that there is no facultie A speciall note of the soule of man which is not infected with both these euils together We reckon as principall powers of the soule the minde or vnderstanding the will and the affections These two last the scripture often vnderstandeth them in the worde hart because the will and affections be seated in the hart The first defect then is in the mind and this is the want of light and knowledge here is also the want of holinesse that is of a quality wherewith our very knowledge and light must be affected and assuredly was affected with in the first creation The light of the minde or knowledge is twofold naturall A two fold light of the mind 1. VVant of naturall light and spirituall In the mind there is a defect
of light or of naturall knowledge not in whole but in part for there do remaine euen in the vnregenerate certaine generall notions of good and euill things which are commanded and condenmed in the law but they be such as serue only to make men inexcusable for that they are but lame and corrupt Rom. 1. 19. The mind also wants spirituall 2. VVant of spirituall light light not in part but in whole for it is vtterly void of this light for as concerning those things which appertaine to the kingdom of heauen the vnderstandings is so darkened that it doth not only not perceiue them but also hath no power to conceiue them 1. Cor. 2. 14. To be short the minde wants holinesse for the things it vnderstandeth 3. VVant of holinâ—sse in the mind it neither conceiueth them rightly and holily but impiously and prophanely all things euen the things which in and by themselues are good For the facultie of vnderstanding albeit it be not vtterly lost yet that holynes of this facultie wherein it was created after the image of God was vtterly lost in the fall of man This want of this naturall light the Apostle sheweth Rom. 1. 21. Because when they knew God they glorified him not as God These latter wordes plainly shew that the naturall light of the minde is but a dim light and soone vanisheth away The want of the spiritual light the Apostle sheweth 1. Cor. 2. 14. The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God The want of sanctitiy in y e vnderstanding the Apostle sheweth Rom. 8. 7. The wisdom of the flesh is enmity against God euen then when it vnderstaÌ„deth those things which otherwise be in themselues true good 2. Cor. 3. 8. Not that we are sufficient of ourselues to thinke any thing to wit well and holily Eph. 4. 18. Hauing their cogitation darkened being estranged from the life of God And there ver 23. And be ye renewed in the spirit of your minde And thus farre of the want or defect which is in the mind There is also a quality in the minde which hath succeeded or stept in place of that light and holinesse which was lost in the fall of man For darknes hath taken possession in the very seate of light Ephesi 5. 8. Yee were in times past darknes but now ye are light in the Lord. In place of sanctitie integrity haue crept in impuritie and a certaine malitiousnesse of nature which euidently appeareth when it is said Rom. 8. 5. For they that are after the flesh sauour the things of the flesh This wisdome is of some euill quality 1. Cor. 1. 18. The preaching of the crosse is to them that perish foolishnesse And 1. Cor. 2. 14. For they are foolishnes vnto him This word foolishnes argueth the peruerse iudgment of the minde Thus far of the want of the mind the contrary quality crept thereinto Both these in like manner are to be seene in the will and in euery affection The want of integrity The will corrupted and vprightnes in the will the Apostle testifieth saying I find no meanes to performe that which is good Rom. 7. 18. and Phil. 2. 13. It is he which worketh in you both the will and the deed The corruption and frowardnes of the will and of the motions thereof is testified by many scriptures As Gen. 6. 5. 6. The conceit of a mans heart is only euill Eph. 2. 3. Doing the will of the flesh and of the minde Finallie this I say that mans will is more poisoned by this originall corruption then the minde is for which Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor cause the very heathen could say I see approue by the light of reason the better things but through the corruption of my will I incline to the worser And this the Apostle saith Eph. 4. 18. Affirming that the ignorance The will worse then the mind which is in men is by reason of the hardnesse of their hearts Rom. 1. 28. They regarded not to know God therefore God deliuered theÌ„ vnto a reprobate mind Note how the obstinate will resisteth the light of the mind and causeth the mind to be ouerclouded And thus far of the threefold matter of originall sinne These parts of the materiall cause of originall sin because they are so many Beings * Entia and are of God euery one of them must retaine in them some goodnes as we say in respect of their being for that very apostasie and falling away was good in it selfe as so the want of originall iustice because it is athing in nature and a consequent of that Apostasie this want I say as it is of God is good in it selfe and to conclude that positiue qualitie which succeedeth in place of that holinesse and image of God for the being thereof is of God as principall efficient and is good in itselfe The forme of originall sinne followeth And this is a The forme of originall sinne very speciall repugnance against the law of God causing a very speciall kind of sinne And like as the matteriall cause of originall sinne is threefold so there is in it a threefold * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 repugnance against God and his law For euery part of the materiall cause hath a repugnance against the law in it and so a forme which is from another in respect whereof it is sinne The first Apostasie hath in it a repugnance against God and so the want of originall iustice and the positiue quality also which succeeded in place thereof This threefold iniquitie * Or breach of Gods law is not of God as efficient but from the euill instruments the deuill first next Adam and lastly the very man which is of Adams progenie For we also which are sick of this hereditarie euill are the very causes of our sicknes And thus far of the forme of originall sin Now we be to define originall sinne of the matter and forme thereof on this wise Originall sinne is an apostasie from God a want of Originall iustice and a certaine positiue qualitie repugning against the law of God The threefold Originall sin defined materiall cause stands for the genus of it and for the forme the threefold breach of Gods law And like as guilt in general is the consequent of sin in general so a speciall guilt Guilt following originall sin is consequent to originall sin and this is threefold also as the matter and forme of this sinne is threefolde For the apostasie hath his speciall guiltinesse following it so also the want of originall iustice and that positiue quality And euery guiltinesse merits death and eternall damnation It resteth now that seeing we see this sinne originall is deriued by propagation from the parents to the children that we search out the manner thereof and this may bee expressed on this wise The propagation of sin must be by one of these 3. waies
sin if he be not the cause of it then is he not the authour of all things Therefore there is no such positiue qualitie at all We answer to the Assumption in that euill positiue quality two things must be respected First the qualitie it selfe or the being of it next the euilnesse or irregularity or deformity therof God is the the authour and principall efficient of the first but the diuell and the euil instrument is the authour and cause of the second This done at last the Iesuit sets downe his owne iudgemēt auouching that original sin consisteth in two things Bellarm iudgment of originall sinne first in the first transgression of Adam not as hee was a certaine priuate person but as being then the person of all mankind next he saith it is also a want of that gift of originall iustice And thus farre he speakes wel affirming that there are two parts of original sin but herein he erreth for that he omitteth that euil positiue quality before mentioned And thus farre of the iudgement of the Aduersaries concerning originall sinne CHAP. XXVI Of Concupiscence BVt because there is some controuersie touching concupiscence which is the third part of originall sinne therefore we be to speake something of it apart The word Concupiscence doth first and properly signifie that coueting or lusting which is said to be in the baser facultie of the soule to wit in the sensible and the naturall power thereof and tropically it signifieth our naturall corruption and that euill positiue quality which resteth not onely in the concupiscible faculty of the soule but in all the powers therof also euē in reason it self For the word Concupiscence in Scripture is as generall as the old man or the flesh for Paule vseth these words indifferently for one and the same matter the old man the flesh concupiscence and the law of the members to wit for the third part of originall sinne which is that euill positiue quality And that concupiscence is properly and truly a sinne appeares plainly out of the Epistle to the Romans ch 7. 7. I had not knowne lust except the law had said thou shalt not lust And this briefly is our iudgment touching Concupiscence Pelagius reckoneth Concupiscence in the number of the good things or benefits of nature for hee denies originall sinne Our aduersaries the Papists by Concupiscence vnderstand nothing els but that concupiscible faculty of the soule which is in it self good or atleast indifferent but euill accidentally and in some respect to wit for that now the bridle or originall iustice is let loose whereby Concupiscence ought to haue been curbed so then this curbe being lost it inclines say they to sinne This is the iudgment of the Councell of Trent The iudgment of the papists concerning concupiscence concerning Concupiscence that it may not be saide truly and properly that it is a sin but that it is so called because it proceedes from sin and inclines to sinne But that Concupiscence is sinne is more manifest by Paules doctrine then that it needes any proofe at all and that it is a sinne not onely in the vnregenerate but also in the regenerate And thus farre of Concupiscence and of originall sinne CHAP. XXVII Of Actuall sinne ACtuall sinne is the fruit and effect and the punishment also of originall sin The first and principall diuision of actuall sin is into Actuall sinne internall and externall The internall I call the sinnes of soule and of the faculties thereof Internall sinne is partly of omission partly of commission A sinne of omission in the mind is the want of a holy and good motion and the roote of this is the want of originall iustice And like as that defect of original iustice is in all the powers of the soule so this internall Sinne of omission what sinne of omission is of all the powers of the soule Of the sinne of omission the Apostle speaketh 1. Cor. 2. 14. when he saith that the naturall man cannot conceiue the things of the Spirit of God Lo here the want of a holy motion in mans nature the fundamentall cause whereof he addeth in the next words saying neither can he perciue them In which words yee haue the want of that power and faculty whence a holy motion doth spring The internall sinne of commission followeth and this is a peruerse and euill motion of the mind And this proceedes from the third part of originall sinne to wit that A sinne of commission euill positiue qualitie or naturall corruption And like as y t positiue quality is of al the faculties of the mind so that internall sinne of commission is of all the powers of the soule in like manner Of this sinne the Scripture speakes euery where Rom. 7. 5. When we were in the flesh the * or affections motions of sinnes which were by the law had force in our members to bring forth fruite vnto death Where three things are to Three things Rom. 7. 5. be obserued first the flesh which is original sin Secondly Affections or motions whereby vnderstand the internall sinne of commission Thirdly the fruit of those motions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or affections whereby he meanes euery externall actuall sinne Againe ye haue the same three things knit together Ephe. 2. 3. Fulfilling the will of the flesh and of the mind 1. the flesh that is originall sin 2. Next the thought or lust of the flesh which is the internall commission of sinne 3. To fulfill the same and this is externall sinne The same things ye haue Iam. 1. 15. When concupiscence hath conceiued it bringeth forth sinne Concupiscence is originall sinne conception is actuall internall sinne the birth thereof is an externall sinne And thus farre of actual internall sinne The externall actuall sinne followeth which is a sinne of the bodie and of the members thereof and this sinne Externall actual sinne also is partly of omission partly of commission The externall sinne of omission is when things to bee done are omitted and this proceedes from the internall sinne of omission And here also like as the internall sinne of omission is of all faculties of the mind so the externall sin of omission is of all the members of the body Of this sin the Apostle speaketh Roman 7. 9. I do not the good which I would do The externall sinne of commission followeth This is when that is done which ought not to be done Externall sin of commission and it proceedes from the internall sinne of commission This is also of all the parts of the body like as the internall sinne of commission is of all the powers of the soule The testimonies of Scriptures before cited proue this Rom. 7. 19. The euill which I would not that do I. The externall sinne of commission is twofold partly of errour and ignorance partly of knowledge It is of ignorance when a man ignorantly committeth any thing This was Paules sinne 1. Tim.
1. 13. For I did it ignorantly through vnbeleefe This ignorance is either of the law or of the fact The ignorance of the law is to be ignorant of Gods will Of this Sin speaketh Christ Luke 12. 48. He that hath not known his masters wil hath done things worthy of stripes shall be beaten with few stripes This was also Paules ignorance when hee blasphemed and persecuted the Church of Christ 1. Tim. 1. The ignorance of the fact is when a man knowes not what he doth And a man may be said not to know what he doth or to erre in the Sin of ignorance fact either when he doth a thing negligently or when a thing is done by him as we say by fortune or chance or rather by the ineuitable prouidence of God An example of sinne of negligence may be this as when a ship is lost by the negligence of the Gouernour or maister thereof An example of a sinne by fortune or Gods prouidence may be as when one casting a stone killeth a man passing by of whom he neuer thought for this sinne in the old Church the cities of refuge were appointed Numb 35. 23. Thus farre of the external sinne of commission which proceedes of errour or ignorance The externall sinne of commission followeth which is committed in knowledge or as we say wittingly and this is when a man knoweth that hee doth euill hereof speakes Christ Luk. 12. 47. That seruant who knoweth his masters will and doth it not shall be beaten with many stripes This sin is either of infirmitie or of contumacie An example Actual external sinne committed willingly of a sinne of infirmitie is in Peter who three times denied his Lord and maister for feare of death and persecution An example of a sin of contumacie we haue in Iudas the traitor Againe a sin of contumacie is either done in hypocrisie as when a man is not openly rebellious but hides his sinne vnder the cloake of hypocrisie this the Apostle taxeth Rom. 2. 5. Thou saith he after thy hardnesse and heart that cannot repent doest treasure vp wrath against the day of wrath Againe it is an open rebellion or pride when a man ioynes to his contumacy pride against God himselfe for which cause he is said to sinne with an high hand Numb 15. 30. This manifest rebellion and Heresie pride is either against the second Table of the law as open murther knowne adulterie and this is the lesser contumacie but if it be a proud rebellion against the first Table the sinne is intolerable And of this latter kind is Open rebellion heresie first when as a man in a proud obstinacy wil defend anie opinion against the manifest truth of Gods word Of all the sinnes before specified this is one property that a man may repent of them or for them all whereupon followes another property that they are all pardonable But if ye adde to knowledge pride frowardnesse a malicious heart striuing against the holy Ghost inlightening a man teaching inwardly then the great sinne ariseth which they call the sinne against the holy Sinne against the holy Ghost Ghost the propertie whereof is this that hee which so sinneth cannot repent him of his sinne whereupon it followeth that this sinne is impardonable And this sin is called irremissible not for that the greatnesse of it exceeds the greatnes of Gods mercy grace in Christ but VVherefore impardonable because finall impenitence is the reward and punishment which by Gods iust iudgment is inflicted vpon this sinne Read of this point Matt. 12. 21. Heb. 6. 4. 5. and chap. 10. 26. 1. Ioh. 5. 16. And thus farre of actuall sinne Now it remaineth to see what the aduersaries say of actuall sinne Here the greatest controuersie is of the diuision of actuall sinne into mortall and veniall We auouch that euery sin by nature is mortall that is that the guilt Sinne mortall veniall a popish doctrine of eternall death followes it And that if any sinne be veniall that is may find pardon of God this commeth to passe not for that it is so by nature but of Gods meere mercie in Iesus Christ Many scriptures approue our assertion Ro. 6. 23. The wages of sin is death He speakes here of sin in generall and of eternall death Matth. 5. 19. Who soeuer shall breake one of the least of these commandements and shall teach men so heshall be called the least in the kingdome of God that is he shal haue be of reckoning in heauen Obserue then here how for the least sin a man deserues to be shut forth out of heauen Deut. 27. 26. Cursed be he that abideth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law Therefore there is no sinne which deserueth not the curse or malediction of God For in that the law denounceth an execration against euery sin there is no exception we see of anie euen the least sinne I am 2. 10. Whosoeuer shall keepe the whole law and yet fayleth in one point hee is guiltie of all Therefore if ye rest in any one sinne against the law ye sinne against the whole law and stand guiltie of all sinnes which are committed any way against the law So there is no cause why wee should measure our guilt by anie one sinne euen the verie least For euen the verie least sinne we liue and lie in without faith repentance The least sinne merits hell caries with it the guilt euen of the greatest sinnes as may clearely appeare by that place of Iames. Matth. 5. 26. Thou shalt not depart thence till thou hast paid the vtmost farthing Therefore God in his accounts respecteth euen the least parts of sinne and the smallest sinnes that are The tenth law condemnes euen the least motions of concupiscence Matth. 22. 37. Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thine heart with all thy soule and with all thy mind Therefore the law requires an exact or perfect obedience Wherefore he that offendeth euen in the least point is a transgressor of the law and that euerlasting curse followeth the breach of the law if redemption be not purchased by Iesus Christ Matt. 5. 18. Till heauen and earth perish one iote or one tittle of the law shall not scape till all things be fulfilled Note here there shal not passe away one iote or one tittle that is the least branch of the breach of the law which shall escape without satisfaction either by our selues or a mediator And thus far touching our iudgment of this matter The aduersaries for actuall sinne respecting it either according to the greatnesse thereof or for the punishment it deserueth they diuide it into mortall and veniall They cal that mortall sinne which doth extinguish charity Mortal sin defined of Papists or iustice making vs enimies vnto God and therefore guilty of eternall death They call that veniall sinne which doth not quench charitie and iustice nor doth not
cause an enmitie betwixt vs and God but dooth a little staine iustice which they place in charitie and they say it A popish veniall sinne spots it a little wherefore this sinne say they is soone pardoned and expiate with a light punishment as in this life with the repetition of the Lords prayer the smiting of the breast satisfactiō or penance imposed by the priest or which men do of thēselues voluntarily vndergo After this life all venial sinnes be expiat in purgatory if they be not pardoned in this life by the meanes before expressed They say veniall sinne is twofold the first veniall sin is so called because it is so by nature and for the substance Venial sin 2. of it as an idle word or immoderate laughter The next veniall sinne they say is that which is not so by nature but for some imperfection for that sin by nature is mortall but because it is imperfect for the measure or quantity of the euill therefore it is veniall This imperfection say they is twofold for this imperfection is either by reason of the will as when there is not a full consent of the will vnto a secret motion of concupiscense In this kind of venial sinne they reckon all euil secret motions which stirre in the affection before the mind can think of them and which get not any full consent of the will as the motions of lust of anger of enuie c. Oragaine there is an imperfection in respect of the matter of the sinne to wit when the matter is so small and light that it makes the sin veniall as for example if a man steale a half-peny or some such trifle wherby the neighbour is little or nothing touched and charity is not violate And they go about to proue their opinion concerning veniall sinne by diuers kindes of arguments First by testimonies of the scripture and of the Church next by reasons of their owne in refutation of which arguments my Popish arguments for veniall sinne meaning is not to insist For veniall sinne they cite Mat. 12. 32. Whosoeuer shall speake against the holy Ghost it shall not be forgiuen him neither in this world nor in the world to come Therefore say they there is a kinde of sinne which shal be pardoned after this life and the same is venial sin which is purged with the fire of purgatory But let Mark chap. 3 29. bee the interpreter of this phrase which Mathew hath in this place Whosoeuer saith he shall blaspheme against the holy Ghost shal neuer haue forgiuenes but is culpable or guilty of eternall damnation Therefore where Mathew saith neither is this life nor in the life to come it is the same as if he said It shall neuer be forgiuen him They bring also the place which is Mat. 5. 22. Whosoeuer is angry with his brother vnaduisedly shal be culpable of iudgment and whosoeuer saith vnto his brother Raca shal be worthy to be punished by the Councel and whosoeuer shal say foole shal be worthy to be punished with hell fire There are here 3. kinds of sins say they of which he adiudgeth one kinde only worthy of hell fire wherefore the two former are to be expiat with some light punishment and therfore be veniall sinnes I answere this place teacheth vs that there is an inequality first of sinnes next of punishments and those also spirituall and infernall which Christ expresseth here by an allusion to ciuill and politique penalties which were vnequall They reason also on this wise No man say they will denie that one sin is lesser then another by nature Therefore Popish reasons for veniall sin is not the lesser sinne veniall by nature I answer it followeth not for that the least sinne by nature meriteth eternall death and eternall punishment albeit not the greatest punishment For we deuie not the inequalitie of the paines of the damned Next say they is not one sin lesse then another in quantity And therefore is it not veniall in respect of the imperfection thereof I answer it followeth not for euery sin howsoeuer imperfect meriteth eternal death or if it be venial it is not for the imperfectiō of it but for Christs sake and his satisfaction for it Thirdly they say is not that sin veniall which doth not destroy or ouerthrow iustice charity or inherent grace But there are some sinnes which doe not ouerthrow or extinguish iustice Ergo there be some venial sinnes The assumption is proued The iust man fals 7. times in the day and riseth againe Behold here one sinneth and yet ceaseth not to be iust I answer The proposition is false for that very sinne which doth not extinguish the grace of Christ and inherent holines that very sinne by it owne nature is mortall And in that it is pardonable and doth not abolish holines that is not to be imputed to the sin it self but to the free mercy of God in Iesus Christ CHAP. XXVIII The controuersie concerning the sinne against the holy Ghost THE aduersaries say there be 6. kindes of this sinne The first sinne is presumption when a The Papists say there be six kinds of the sinne against the holy Ghost man presumeth ouermuch of the grace of God and of faith in the meane while denying his faith by his works This is the man whom Iames taxeth in his Epistle Chap. 2. vers 14. and after Thesecond is desperation contrary to presumption this was Cain and Iudas sin The third is to impugne the knowne truth hereto belongs the blasphemie against the holy 3 Ghost this was the sinne of the Pharasies Matth. 12. The fourth is to enuy or to repine at the graces of God in our 4 brethren this was the sin of the Iewes which did repine and grieue at the grace of God giuen the Gentiles The fift is obstinacy when as a man shal persist in a known sin with an obstinate mind This was Pharaohs sinne and 6 the obstinate Iewes The sixt is finall impenitency when as any shall die in contempt of the sacrament of penance and of any satisfaction imposed vpon him by Ecclesiasticall order Of this they vnderstand that place 1. Ioh. 5. 16. There is a sin vnto death I do not say that ye should pray for him They say a man sins against the holy Ghost al these waies and that all these sins be inexpiable and that these sins are called irremissible because they bee seldome and hardly forgiuen as men seldome and hardly repent them of these sins But the last which is finall impenitency they thinke that onely is properly sayde to be impardonable because it is neither forgiuen in this life nor after this life And this is their iudgment of the sin against the holy Ghost But we auouch that the scripture doth teach vs there is but one sinne only against the holy Ghost Matth 12. 32. Mark 3. 29. Luke 12. 10. called the blasphemy against the holy Ghost Ye haue a description
appeareth not vnto men neither doe we sufficiently feele it and find it our selues but it shall be seene in another life when as we shall put on beare the image of that heauenly man 1. Cor. 15. 49. Now we are called the sonnes of God but as yet it appeareth not what we shall be but we know it shall come to passe that we shal be like vnto him when he shall appeare 1. Io. 3. 2. The Aduersaries spend all their labour in setting forth the commendations of loue and they be too long in extolling charitie For they adorne it with the spoiles of iustifying faith so gracing it with stolen colours and not with it owne proper beautie ascribing the iustification and saluation of man which they take away from faith vnto charitie as shall be seene when we come to speake of the doctrine of free iustification And thus farre shall suffice of charity or loue CHAP. XXXIIII Of Repentance REpentance followeth faith as the effect followeth his cause For that godly sorrow which is according to God and worketh repentance is the daughter of Faith as we shall see afterward Of this benefit there are diuers names in diuers languages The Hebrues do cal it TESCHUBHAH the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of a verbe which signifieth to bee wise after a thing is done to retract his sentence to change his mind to returne to a right mind Whereupon Repentance is nothing els but an after wit a reuersing of iudgment and chaunge of determinations The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to be carefull and anxious after a thing is done Wherupon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing els but a trouble and disquietnesse of heart after a thing is acted Therefore these two Greeke words differ for that the first concerneth properly the mind or vnderstanding the second the heart and affection They differ also in another respect in that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comprehendeth the whole worke and benefit of Repentance for the change of the mind which is implied in this word doth necessarily presuppose the sorrow of the heart and that same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is a contrition an axnietie after the fact committed whereas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rather restrained to signifie only a part of this benefit namely the first which consisteth in sorow in contrition and the disquiet of the heart after a thing is done for it followeth not that wheresoeuer this same cōpunction of of heart be there should presently follow that sound Repentance as it is necessarie that wheresoeuer sound Repentance be found there also must be that compunction of heart Some there are which make a third difference betweene these two affirming that this sound Repentance properly belongs to the godly and to the Elect and onely to them for the elect onely properly and in very truth become wise after their fals and they doe onely change their minds and their purposes returne to a sound mind whereas some compunction and disquietnesse of heart doth not onely belong to the godly and the elect but also to the wicked and to the Reprobates in whom there is found after a sin committed some griefe and disquietnesse of heart not so much for the sinne committed as for the punishment of the sinne But we are to vnderstand that wheresoeuer this same sorrow is attributed to the wicked there is not vnderstood hereby that godly care and sorrow which is according to God but a worldly sorrow and a sorrow which is vnto death In which sense it is attributed to Iudas Mat. 27. 3. Iudas repented himselfe but contrariwise when it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is attributed to the Godly thereby is signified not so much a sorrow for the punishment of sinne it selfe as for the offence and displeasure of God Thus farre of the Greeke names of Repentance The Latines do call it a Conuersion an after-wit to returne to heart and vnderstanding and repentance Conuersion Conuersio Resipiscentia doth fitly answer with the Hebrue word and it is a word which the Prophets haue vsed in the old Testament Teschubbah Conuert me O Lord and I shall be conuerted Ier. 31. Euen as Christ and his Apostles themselues vse the foresaid Greeke words in the newe Testament of Repentance and Compunction of heart A change of the mind is properly signified in the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 change the mind is to begin to be wise after the deede done Penance is signified in the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for it is deriued of the verbe Poenitere which signifieth a punishment for in this kind of repentance that sorrow and anxietie of the heart is a punishment For as the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth differ from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so doth poenitentia penance from the word Resipiscentia Resipiscentia Repentance For to passe by other differences the word Penance signifieth properly one part onely of this benefit to wit sorrow disquietnesse and anxietie after the deed done But the word Resipiscentia which is a change of the mind doth comprehend this whole benefit for the change of the mind and to become wise after our fals doth necessarily presuppose the sorrow of the heart as the efficient cause The old Latine translation doth translate both the Greeke words euery where Poenitentia Penance The aduersaries doe earnestly contend that the word Penance is euerie where to be retained to wit that they may defend the Sacrament of Penance as they call it euen by the very name it self to consist in externall and corporall affliction The word Resipiscentia which signifieth a change of the mind is more vsed by our Diuines when they speake of this grace And thus much concerning the names of this benefit The parts thereof are generally these first sorrow then after sorrow a chang of the mind purpose which Parts of Repentance is properly as is afore said signfied by the Greeke word vsed for repentance Wee are therefore first to speake of sorrow which is the first part of repentance and this sorrow is of two kinds First for the punishment of sin which 2. Co. 7. is called The sorrow of the world and also a sorrow Sorrow twofold which is to death Secondly it is a sorrow for the sinne it selfe and because of the offence which is committed against God which in like manner is called of the Apostle A sorrow according to God Of both these we will speake seuerally The principall efficient of the first sorrow which is conceiued in heart for the punishment of sin is the holy Ghost which Rom. 8. verse 15. 16. is called the spirit of bondage to feare that is to say which testifieth vnto vs of our seruile and miserable condition