yee saued through faith not of workes then it followeth ver 10. for wee are his workemanship created in Christ Iesus vnto good workes which God hath or deyned that wee should walke in Here the apostle excludeth euen workes of grace prepared and or dayned of God from being any cause of our iustification Distinct. 43. Some things doe iustifie Ex opere operantis by the worke of the doer Id est fide deuotione suscipientis That is by the sayth and deuotion of the recevuer so the sacramentes of the old law did iustifie Some things doe iustifie Ex opere operato by the very worke wrought as the Sacraments of the New Testament Bellarm. de effect sacr lib. 2. cap. 13. Contra. First there is one and the same efficacie substance and operation in generall of the Sacraments both of the olde and newe Testament For they did eate the same spirituall nieate and drinke the same spirituall drinke 1. Cor. 10. 2. 3. Secondly Yet neither of them do conferre grace or are causes of our iustification before God but are onely seales of the iustice or righteousnes that commeth by faith Rom. 4. 41. Yet wee graunt that in the Sacraments of the Gospell there is a more liuely resemblance and more full representation of spirituall things than there was in the other in which respect they are preferred before them Thirdly Wee are not iustified before God in part or in whole by any worke either operantis or ex operato of the doer or of the thing done But wee are iustified onely by faith all workes euen such as are wrought in vs by grace are excluded from being any cause of our iustification before God Ephes. 2. 10. 11. Fourthly And so farre is it off that any iustification can bee had ex opere operato by the worke wrought without respect to the faith of the doer that no such worke is at all acceptable to God much lesse able to iustifie for without faith it is impossible to please God Heb. 11. 6. And thus this Iesuitic all distinction is nipped in the head Distinct. 44. To extenuate eneruate the force efficacie of the death and passion of our Sauiour Christ as though it were not alone by it selfe a sufficient satisfaction for the sinnes of the world vnlesse other satisfactions as helpes were ioyned thereunto they haue forged and deuised impious and blasphemous distinctions of their owne First there is a kinde of satisfaction Pro amicitia restauranda for restoring vs to the friendship of God there is another Pro iustitiae restauranda for restoring of iustice lost and decayed in vs the first satisfaction is only wrought by the death of Christ the other must be wrought by vs Bellar. de poenitent lib. 4. cap. 1. Contra. Christ hath satisfied for vs in paying the raunsome for our sinnes and hath reconciled vs to God in imparting to vs of his righteousnes He hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne that wee should be made the righteousnes of God in him 2. Cor. 5. 21. therefore Christ hath by his death not onely redeemed vs and reconciled vs to the fauour of God but hath also clothed vs with his righteousnes who is made of God vnto vs our wisedom righteousnes sanctification redemption 1. Cor. 1. 30. Not onely our redemption but our righteousnes hec hath therefore satisfied the wrath of God in restoring his friendship and hath repaired iustice decaied in vs by his iustice and righteousnes Distinct. 45 There is a satisfaction pro â—câ—â—â—a for 〈…〉 another kinde pro poena for the punishment The first was 〈…〉 by Christ 〈…〉 the other is our satisfaction to bee 〈…〉 mine ibidem So there is duplex 〈…〉 〈◊〉 double or twofold remission of sins the first in baptisme both 〈…〉 poena from fault and punishment the second from the fault but wee our selues must satisfie for the punishment Bellarm. depoenitent lib. 4. cap. 14. Contra. If our sinnes be for giuen vs the punishment likewise together with the sinne is remoued for sinne causeth death and all other punishments It should not therfore stand with the iustice of God to lay punishment vpon men hauing forgiuen them their sinnes for this were to say that their sinnes are not truely forgiuen Christ hath set vs at peace with God by the bloud of his crosse Coloss. 1. 20. Ergo hee hath satisfied both for the offence and punishment For if God punish stil then were we not at perfite peace with him his anger yet abiding And whereas they make the first remission of sinnes to be auailable both for the sinne and punishment the second but for the sinne the Apostle reasoneth cleane contrarie If while we were yet sinners and enimies Christ dyed for vs much more being iustified by his blood and reconciled by his death wee shalbe saued from wrath through him Ro. 5. 10. 11. Much more saith the Apostle if then in the first reconciliation to God we had remission of both being now reconciled wee shall much more Hence also it is manifest that Christ worketh all both before our reconciliation and after Distinct. 46. Men also may satisfie for the fault but ex congruo non ex condigno It is a satisfaction of congruitie not of condignitie Bellarm. li. 4. de poenitent cap. 1. Contra. There is no satisfaction wrought by man for his sinnes no not of congruitie First it is repugnant to the nature and propertie of satisfaction for that which is of congruitie is accepted of fauour but satisfaction is an exact compensation in respect of iustice by this God is iustly satisfied by the other hee is but enclined to fauour as they teach Secondly there is no satisfaction for sinne ex congruo for when we were enimies saith S. Paul wee were reconciled to God Rom. 5. 10. But nothing that enimies can do is acceptable vnto God therfore God cannot any waies no not ex congruo by our satisfaction be appeased before our reconciliation nor yet afterward for our sinne in the purchasing of our reconciliation was alreadie satisfied for by Christ. Distinct. 47. Man can not satisfie God for the eternall punishment due vnto sinne but for the temporall he may Bellarm. lib. 4. de poenitent cap. 1. Contr. Seeing our Sauiour Christ hath fully redeemed vs by his most precious bloud he hath not onely satisfied for our sinne but for our punishment both eternall and temporall due vnto sinne Heb. 10. 14. with one offring hath he made persite or as the Rhemistes read consummated for euer them that are sanctified If then he haue consummated vs by our redemption he hath satisfied for all for if any thing were left to be done by vs wee should not be consummated by him And as for the punishments and chastenings of this life S. Paul sheweth the ende of them not to make satisfaction but we are chastened of the Lord that we should not be condemned with the world 1. Corinth 11. 32. Distinct. 48. There is
as there was in the law 2 The scripture saith Where the remission of these thinges is there is no more offering for sin Heb. 10. 18. But they teach that their Masse is a sacrifice propitiatorie both for the quicke and the dead as though remission of sinnes were not already obtained by the oblation of Christ. 3. Also the scripture saith Without shedding of blood is no remission Heb. 9. 22. how then can their sacrifice giue remissiō of sins as they affirme where there is no effusion or shedding of blood for they cal it the vnbloody sacrifice Bellarm. de miss lib. 1. cap. 25. Their doctrine and superstitious vse of priuate masses where the priest receyueth alone the people onely gazing and looking vpon him neither eating nor drinking is altogether repugnant to the vsage and doctrine of the Apostles as Saint Paul witnesseth Wee that are many are one bread and one bodie in as much as wee are all partakers of one bread 1. Corinth 11. 17. There ought to bee therefore many at the communion which are made partakers of one bread They affirme that it is a necessarie thing to receyue the communion fasting Bellarm. de miss lib. 2. cap. 14. But the Apostle seeth no such necessitie in it giuing libertie vnto those that can not endure to fast to eate at home before 1. Cor. 11. 34. yet abstinence for them that are able is conuenient That it is lawful for the parties married to be dismissed each from other for diuerse causes beside fornication as for heresie for auoiding of offence for the vow of continencie Bellarm. de matrim lib. 1. cap. 14. yet our Sauiour Christes words are plaine to the contrary Whosoeuer doth put away his wife except it be for fornication causeth her to commit adultery Math. 5. 32. That the coupling in marriage of a faithfull partie with an infidel is not onely illicitum but irritum is not onely vnlawfull to be made but being made is voide Bellarm. de matrim lib. 1. cap. 23. S. Paul teacheth the contrarie The woman that hath to her husband an infidel if he consent to dwell with her let her not put him away 1. Corinth 7. 13. The marriage therefore of such is not in respect of the vnbeleeuers infidelitie if there be no other cause actually void Though we grant acknowledge also with S. Paul that it is not lawful for the faithful to match in marriage with an infidel 2. Cor. 6. 14. That it is not against the law of nature for a man to marry his brothers wife neither that it is simplie prohibited in the law of Moses but that in some cases it may be dispensed withal Caietan Bellar. Bellar. de matrim lib. 1. cap. 27. But Iohn Baptist the best expounder of the lawe openly reproued Herod saying It is not lawfull for thee to haue thy brothers wife Math. 14. Mar. 6. It is a generall reproofe without any exception or limitation at al. That we are not iustified onely by faith yea they say that workes are more principal then faith in the matter of iustification Rhemist Iam. 2. sect 7. Flat contrary to the doctrine of the Apostle Therefore we hould that a mā is iustified by faith without the workes of the law Rom. 3. 28. Workes are so far from being more principall then faith that they haue not to doe at all in the matter of iustification before God That some sinnes are veniall pardonable of their owne nature not worthy of damnation Rhemist Rom. 1. sect 11. Whereas the Apostle sayth that the stipend of sinne is death speaking generally of all sinne Rom. 6. 23. yet both great small sinnes are not onely pardonable but indeed clearly remitted and pardoned by grace in Christ vnto the faithfull and beleeuers which repent and study to amend The law by Christ say they is Ministratio vitae effecta is made the ministration of life Andrad lib. 5. And they call it verbum fidei the word of faith Trident. Concil sess 6. cap. 7. But S. Paule calleth it a killing letter ministerie of condēnation 2. Corinth 3. 6. 9. And that it serueth but as a schoolemaister to bring vs to Christ Galath 3. 24. And he saith flatly that the law is not of faith Galath 3. 12. How then dare they call it the worde of faith vnlesse they list to play with an aequinocation of the worde contrarie to the Apostles meaning But it were too long to rehe arse all their opinions which they maintaine contrarie to scripture such in a manner are all which they houlde wherein they dissent from vs. Let these therefore suffice for example sake which we haue seene and for the rest wee will take their owne confession who doe not denie but that they hold diuerse opinions which are not grounded nor gathered out of scripture as Gabriel Biel confesseth of transubstantiation Non inuenitur in canone bibliae expressum It is not found expressed in the canon of the bible In canon lect 40. Likewise Siluester Prierias Indulgentiae authoritate scripturae non innotuere nobis Pardons or indulgēces are not known vnto vs by authority of scripture lib. cont Luth. Bellarmine also graunteth that single life is not imposed vpon ministers by the word of God there being no precept neither in the old or new testamēt that forbiddeth ministers to marrie Declericis lib. cap. 18. Againe in an other case he confesseth that Matrimoniū inter fidelem infidelē non est iure diuino irritum That mariage betweene a beleeuer an infidel is not void orfrustrate by the law of God yet the papists generally hold the contrary De matrimon lib. 1. cap. 23. And many other such like opiniōs they haue which in their iudgment are not found in scripture but as we thinke are able to proue are cōtrary to scripture in so much that it is a cōmon saying of their schoole-diuines Thus wold I say thus would I hold being in schooles but yet be it spoken here amongest our selues It cannot be so proued by the holy scriptures Ex Paralipom Abbat Vrspergens Bellarmine also concerning the adoration of Images saith that in a sermon before the people it is not safe to affirme that images are to be adored Cultulatreiae with religious worship de sanctor imaginib lib. 2. cap. 22. and yet he graunteth that concerning the matter it selfe it may be admitted that images after a sorte and improperlie may haue that kinde of worship cap. 23. Is not this now an holy religion that in corners secretly whispereth one thing as in the care and publikelie maintaineth and teacheth an other I conclude then this place with that saying of Bernard as he said of certaine superstitious orders of monkes An regula non concordat euangelio vel apostolo alioquiregula iam non est regula quia non recta Doth not your rule agree with the gospell or the Apostle then is it no rule because it is not right Apolog. Bernard so may
you spare neither Apostle pastor nor minister neither primitiue and auncient nor present and now being Church say on still as ye doe that the protestants tende euery day more and more to Atheisme and Antichristianisme Rhemist 2. Thessa. 2. sect 14. That the protestantes haue forsaken Christ the protestantes are become Iewes the protestantes wil be circumcised according to Moses law the protestantes require to haue the paschal Lambe the protestantes tell the people there is no hell at all the protestantes at their next proceeding wil vtterly denie God Har ding praefat ad defens apolog ex Iuello Well yee slaunderous mouthed hypocrites if Ieremies saying were not verified vppon you Thou hast a whores forehead thou wouldest not be ashamed 3. 3. ye might well blushe and shew al your blood in your face when you inuent such vnchristian slaunders against vs which the worlde crieth shame vpon and your owne consciences accuse ye of Wee haue no other shielde to holde vp against these iniuries of yours but the prophet Dauids saying with his words in the person of our Church As he loued cursing so let it come vnto him and as he loued not blessing so shall it be farre from him as he clothed him selfe with cursing like a rayment so shall it come into his bowels like water and like oyle into his bones Let it be vnto him as a garment to couer him and for a girdle wherewith he shall alway be girded Let this be the rewarde of mine aduersarie from God and of them that speake euill against my soule Psal. 109 vers 17. 18. 19. 20. Heare ye also what Bernard saith Gladius anceps lingua detractoris Nec verò huiusmodi linguam ipso mucrone quo dominicum latus confossum est crudeliorem dicere verearis haec enim non iam examine Christi corpus fodit sed facit examine fodiendo A slauderous tongue is a two edged sword And such a tongue we need not doubt to cal more cruel then the speares point that peirced our Lordes side for this doth not pierce or wound the dead bodie of Christ but slayeth and woundeth it to death serm de triplici custodia Thus yee papistes shew your selues greater enimies to Christ in slaundering his Church then if ye had thrust his body through that hanged vppon the crosse for then his bodie was first dead before it was pierced But you doe rent and wound the liuelie bodie of Christ now which is his Church I pray God giue you grace if yee belong vnto him to repente you of this wickednes And thus much also concerning the slaunders and malicious reportes giuen out by papistes against our Church The 3. part of the manifold vntruthes forgeries and bold denials of papistes of manifest vntruthes Part. 3. IT followeth now in the third place hauing alreadie sufficiently discoursed of their personal slaunders which they vomite and spue vp either against our Church in general or against some particular members thereof that now we lay open to the worlde their vntruthes and lies which in heapes are coyned and forged out of their shoppes that whereas they accuse vs of lying saying most scornefully That lies are as common with heretikes as lice with beggers Harding it may euidentlie appeare to the world whether of twaine be the greate lyers And first of their forgeries Neuer anie Heretikes were more cunning or had better dexteritie in forging of writinges and foisting bookes of their owne deuising and making vnder the name of other authors First the Canons of the Apostles as they call them which are fathered vpon the Apostles are but bastard writinges falsely going vnder their name for in the last canon the gospell written by S. Iohn is numbred among the bookes of the newe testament which is confessed by all to haue beene penned by the Euangelist after the death of all or most of the Apostles How could then these Canons as they affirme be deuised and published by the Apostles them selues assembled together Againe those Canons of the Apostles doe recken 3. bookes of the Macchabees amongest the canonicall scripture But the papistes them selues receiue but two if then they were perswaded them selues that they were the verie Canons of the Apostles how durst they disagree from them in opinion Plura apud Whitacher controu 1 de scriptur cap. 4. The constitutions also of the Apostles the collection whereof is ascribed to Clemens seemeth to be but a forged booke conteining many thinges false and friuolous as lib. 6. cap. 14. He bringeth in Iames the brother of Iohn writing and speaking with the rest of the Apostles many yeares after his death Lib. 6. cap. 7. he calleth Philip spoken of Act. 8. an Apostle but lib. 8. cap. 52. he maketh him but a Deacon Of the like credite are the counterfeit writinges which passe vnder the name of Abdias Ignatius Hippolytus Policarpus as it may appeare by the homely stuffe contained in them Abdias prescribeth a most superstitious obseruation of Lent fast not onely in abstaining from all flesh-meates but also from all carnall copulation betweene man and wife The same Abdias is also contrarie to himselfe for he affirmeth that Paule suffered 2. yeares after Peter And saith further that Paule after Peter was crucified remained in his custodie at Rome mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles which was as Hierome saith the 3. or 4. yeare of Nero so that by this account there must be 10. yeares space betweene the suffering of Paule and Peter for it is confessed by all writers that Paule suffered the 14. that is the last yeare of Nero. Ignatius saith in his epistle to the Philippians that if any man shal fast on Sunday or Saturday he is a murtherer of Christ so hoat this counterfeit father is about his counterfeit traditions Of the like authoritie is Policarpus epistle ad Philippen which is gathered out of the Apocryphall constitutions of counterfeit Clemens Hippolytus booke is too ful of fables then to be thought to be that auncient Martyrs worke for writing of Antichrist he saith he shalbe no man but a deuil in the shape of man that Iohn the Euangelist shal come with Henoch and Helias before the comming of Antichrist that Antichrist shal bring deuils with him in the shape of Angels and commaund them to carie him vp to heauen with other such stuffe Now commeth in that vncleane dunghil of decretals which are falsely attributed to those good Bishops of Rome that suffered in the great persecutions in the primitiue age of the Church for the testimonie of Iesus As wee may strongly coniecture by the matter and substance of those decretals The epistle fathered vppon Alexander doth euidentlie appeare to be counterfeit by the date which it beareth when Traianus and Helianus were Consuls But there was neuer anie Helianus Consull with Traianus Fulk 1. Tim. 4. 13. Euaristus Bishop of Rome is saide to haue decreed that no priest should be ordained without a title But it is not like that
apart and so ought we verilie to beleeue affirmed by D. Benet maister of the Sorbonistes disputing with Frauncis Rebezies Martyr ex Crispin lib. 6. Fox 921. In the towne of Perth in Scotland Fryer Spense in his sermon affirmed that prayer made to Saintes was so necessarie that without it there could bee no hope of saluation to man ex regist Scotiae Fox pag. 1267. Thus Christ we see is displaced and thrust out of dores as whose mediation is not necessarie and the idolatrous inuocation of Saints brought in insteed thereof That there are some men in this life so iust that they need no repentance affirmed by the Rhemistes Luk. 15. sect 1. for so they expound that place ver 7. of men that continue iust and godly and are not penitent for their sinnes An other calleth marriage a prophanation of holy orders Greg. Martin discouer cap 15. sect 11. Contrarie to the Apostle who saith that marriage is honourable amongst all men Heb. 13. Our heartes and inward repentance are open to the Angels and other celestiall spirites in heauen Rhemist Luk. 15. sect 2. And thus they blasphemouslie rob God of his honour in attributing that to creatures which is peculiar to his Maiestie namely to bee a searcher and knower of our hearts 1. King 8. 39. That wee may beleeue in Saintes and that it is true of them as saint Paul sayth How can they call on him on whome they haue not beleeued Rom. 10. 14. So we cannot pray to any Saint in heauen vnlesse we beleeue and trust that they can helpe vs Rhemist Rom. 10. sect 4. A blasphemie contrarie to Scripture which sayth yee beleeue in God beleeue also in me Iohn 14. 1. God onely and his Christ is to be beleeued vpon That wee neede not maruell if the image of our Ladie and the like do stranger and greater miracles then those which Christ himselfe did Rhemist Iohn 14. sect 3. A monstrous blasphemie that images worke stranger miracles then Christ himselfe Catharinus a great papist sayth that the commandement in the lawagainst Images was but temporall and to continue but till the establishing of the New testament ex Bellarm. de imaginib sanctor lib. 2. cap. 7. That there is a religious worshippe properly due vnto Images yea as they are considered in themselues Et non solum vt vicem gerunt exemplaris And not onely as they represent an other thing Bellarm. de imaginib sanctor lib. 2. cap. 21. Lo then by these popish doctrine Images are to bee worshipped with diuine and religious worship which the Angels themselues refuse and is onely due vnto God Reuelat. 22. 9. That euery popish priest is after the order of Melchisedech and that the proper acte of Christes priest-hood consisteth in the perpetuall offering of his bodie and blood in the Church Rhemist Heb. 7. sect 8. That the sacrifice of Christ vpon the crosse was not after the order of Melchisedech but after the order of Aaron Heskius lib. 1. cap. 13. What intollerable blasphemie is this to affirme that euery vile massing priest is after the order of Melchisedech and to denie that Christ vpon the crosse was in that act a priest of Melchisedechs order And thus shall euery one of their shauelings be more properly a priest then Christ. In the idolatrous seruice of their Masse they vtter blasphemies in heapes Wee beseech thee sayth the priest receyue this oblation and yet they affirme that it is the verie bodie and bloode of Christ here then the priest is made a mediator for Christ. And agayne Commaunde thou these to be brought by the handes of the holy Angel into heauen But if it be the bodie of Christ what neede it bee carried by an Angel Let the Priest bow him selfe to the host saying I worship thee I glorifie thee Loe here they worship a peece of bread In canon Missae And to conclude they doubt not to say that sacerdos est creator creatoris sui That the priest doth make his maker Iewelrespons ad articul p. 615. It is not a sufficient satisfaction to beleeue that Christ hath abundantly satisfied for vs but God also must bee satisfied for our sins by the punishment of our selues Concil Tridentin sess 14. can 13. A blasphemous assertion that Christes satisfaction is not sufficient for vs. Men can not bee saued though they bee predestinate vnlesse they keepe Gods commandementes Rhemist Act. 27. sect 3. By this speech they seeme to insinuate that a man predestinate of God may misse of saluation which is a blasphemous thought for Gods eternall decree chaungeth not The Rhemistes alleadg this saying of Hierome They follow the lambe whither soeuer he goeth if the lambe be in euery place then they that bee with the lambe must be euerie where you see say they how that blessed father refuted the Caluinistes before they were borne Rhemist Apocalyps 6. sect 1. Are not now the papistes I pray you become vibiquitaries them selues nay worse then vbiquitaries enclyning to the opinion of the omnipresence not onely of the humanity of Christ but euen of the saintes which is a great blasphemie That confidence and assurance that faithfull men haue of their saluation they call a faithlesse persuasion a most damnable false illusion and presumption Rhemist Rom. 8. sect 9. A fond speciall faith and fiction Rom. 4. sect 9. yea they most wickedly say that it is not fides Apostolorum but fides demoniorum not the faith of the Apostles but the faith of Deuils 1. Corinth 9. 9. yet this assuraunce and persuasion of saluation is grounded vpon the Scriptures as where Saint Paul sayth I am persuaded or I am sure that neyther death nor life c. shall bee able to remoue vs from the loue of God Rom. 8. ver 38. 39. And S. Peter That wee should make our election and calling sure 2. Pet. 1. 10. A dead faith is a true faith and the same which is called the catholike faith and in substance al one with that faith that iustifieth Rhemist Iames. 2. sect 11. So by this reason the faith of deuils and iustifying faith shal be all one in substance for that dead faith as the apostle sheweth the deuils them selues may haue for they beleeue and tremble Iames. 2. 19. The certaintie of remission of sinnes with a sure confidence and trust in Christ may be found euen amongest schismatikes heretikes and wicked men Coun. Trident. sess 6. cap. 9. It appeareth by this that they vnderstand not what this sure trust and confidence meaneth when so vnaduisedlie and grossely they affirme it to be found amongest wicked men None can be affured of remission of finnes but there followeth peace of conscience with God And this peace none can haue but they which are iustified by faith Rom. 5. 1. and none are so iustified but the righteous and faithfull That the decree sentence which was pronounced by the high priests scribes against Christ was iust and right Hosius cont Brentiū lib. 2.
And that it might was truely pronouncod by Caiphas that Christ was worthie of death And thus wickedlie they take part with Annas and Caiphas against Christ. Some other papistes say that they erred not in the sentence giuen against Christ for he was in deede guiltie of death hauing taken our sinnes vpon him but the error was in the manner of their proceeding which was done tumultuonsly and by suborning of false witnesses And this saith Bellarmin their great doctor is Probabilis sentētia a very probable opiniō de concilior authoritat lib. 2. pag. 8. Yea they speake yet more plainly Iudaei mortaliter peccassent nisi Christum crucifixissent the Iewes had sinned mortally if they had not crucified Christ. distinct 13. Itē in margine An other saith Petrus non fidē Christi sed Christum salua fide negauit Peter denied not the faith of Christ but his faith saued hee denied but onely Christ. Copus dialog 1. pag. 51. Is not here good popish diuinity that Christ may be denied without deniall of the faith The Rhemistes affirme that Christ did penance by fasting solitarines and conuersing with beastes Mark. ◠sect 6. This is great blasphemie for Christ was free from sinne therefore needed no repentance That Lazarus and Abraham were both in hell and not in the kingdome of heauen before Christ. Rhemist Luk. 16. sect 1. A blaspemie contrarie to scripture which saith that the rich man onely was in hell ver 23. and not that Lazarus was in hell They deny that Christ is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is God of himselfe Rhemist Iohn 10. sect 3. Whereas the scripture speaketh plainely that as the father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the sonne to haue life in himselfe Iohn 5. 26. what is it to haue life in himself but to be God in himselfe The sufferings passions of the Saintes dedicated and sanctified in the blood of Christ haue a forcible satisfactiō for the Church the particular members thereof and are the accomplishment of the wantes of Christes passions Rhemist Coloss. 1. sect 4. An horrible blasphemy against the merite satisfaction of Christes death as though it were not sufficient in it selfe to satisfie for al his members but his wantes must be supplied by the satisfaction of others contrarie to the scripture which saith that Christ by him selfe hath purged our sinnes Heb. 1. 3. therefore not by any other but sufficiently in his owne person Bellarmine saith Non dubitantur multi esse fideles qui nondum iustificati nec redempti sunt It is not to be doubted but that there are many faithfull men which are not yet iustified or redeemed de Miss lib. 2. cap. 22. resp ad 4. obiect yea he saith most blasphemously Hominem cum vera fide damnari That a man hauing a true faith may for al that be condemned De baptism lib. 1. cap. 14. Great blasphemies contrarie to scripture being iustified by faith saith S. Paul we are at peace with God Rom. 5. 1. And we are saued by faith Ephes. 2. 10. If then faith bringeth peace of conscience and saluation how then is it possible that with this faith men notwithstanding should be condemned That we are not formaliter that is formallie iustified by the righteousnes of Christ. Bellarm. lib. 1. de baptis cap. 21. resp ad argum 4. yet S. Paul saith that Christ is our wisedome righteousnes 1. Cor. 1. 30. his righteousnes is our righteousnes what is this else but the verie forme substance and matter of our righteousnes And againe saith he sacrificium crucis non efficienter iustificat Christes sacrifice vpon the crosse doth not iustifie as an efficient cause de Miss lib. 2. cap. 4. Thus Christes death is neither formal nor efficient cause of our iustification with papistes I pray you then what is it But the Apostle I am sure saith otherwise That Christ hath recōciled vs in the body of his flesh Col. 1. 21. 22. he then that reconcileth ransometh or redeemeth vs what is he else but an agent efficient working cause of our redemption reconciliation Bellarmine also saith Accedente dei gratia vere possumus aliquo modo ex proprijs ad aequalitatem ac per hoo iuste ex condigno satisfacere By the grace of God we may make satisfaction truely in some sorte of our owne and to a full equalitie yea iustly and condignly de poenitent lib. 4. cap. 7. A most horrible blasphemie that man may satisfie God by his owne proper workes fully according to the exact rule of iustice Iob saith contrary That man can not aunswere God one thing of a thousand Iob 9. 3. Neither is this blasphemie much qualified by saying that wee may satisfie by grace For these two Gods grace and our satisfactorie workes cannot stand together as S. Paul sheweth If it be of grace it is no more of workes for then grace were no more grace but if it be of workes it is no more of grace for then worke were no more worke Rom. 11. 6. Our saluation then can not be of grace and workes together for the one excludeth the other And I pray you to what purpose died Christ if men receiue grace so fully to satiefie for them selues If righteousnes be by the lawe saith the Apostle Christ died without cause Galath 2. 21. And euē this righteousnes of the Law was also of the grace gift of God for the Lawe is holy iust and good Rom. 7. 12. And euerie good gift is of God Iam. 1. 17. Wherefore to say that a man by working well euen of the grace and the gift of God is iustified is to make the death of Christ needelesse and in vaine What greater blasphemie then can be vttered by any heretikes in the world then this Now in the last place commeth in wicked blasphemous frier Tecell the Popes pardoner who made his proclamations openly in the Churches to the people in this sort Although a man had laine with our Ladie the mother of Christ and had begotten her with childe yet were he able by the Popes power to pardon the fault Sleidan lib. 13. Vnto these blasphemies afore rehearsed we may adioyne such like popish stuffe out of their Ladie Psalter which was compiled by no small person among them but euen by that Seraphicall doctor of theirs Bonauenture a Cardinall of Rome who liued Ann. 1170. and was Canonized for a Saint by Pope Sixtus the 4. ann 1482. In this blasphemous Psalter such psalmes as the prophet Dauid endited to the honor of God are applied by the foresaid Doctor to the praise of his Ladie And therefore he in diuerse psalmes in steed of the name of the Lord hath put in the name of our Ladie Some fewe examples it shall not be amisse to see Psal. 4. Benedicta sis domina in aeternum maiestas tua in seculum glorificate eam omnes gentes Blessed be thou o Ladie for euer and thy maiestie for
immediately by Iesus Christ Galath 1. 1. and verse 16. he saith he did not immediately being now called and appointed of Christ communicate with flesh and bloode Faith which iustifieth is not the efficient or instrumental cause of saluation Rhemist Galath 6. sect 4. But the contrarie is proued out of scripture 2. Corinth 5. 7. We walke by faith and not by sight As the eie then is the instrument whereby wee behold thinges present so is faith the organon or instrument of the soule whereby we apprehend thinges absent and inuisible That also is an euident place to this purpose Ephes. 2. 10. By grace are ye saued through faith and that not of your selues for it is the gift of God and not of workes What else can be the meaning of this place but that we are saued by grace apprehended by faith So that grace is the efficient cause faith the instrumental And least that any man should say that faith saueth vs as other vertues wrought in vs by grace not by an apprehension of grace but as a meritorious cause as the Rhemistes affirme the Apostle addeth that faith is the gift of God and therefore meriteth not and he excludeth workes euen workes of grace ordained for vs to walke in from beeing any cause of Iustification before God And so faith also is excluded as it is an act or worke of the vnderstanding onely and hath place onely in the matter of saluation in respect of the apprehensiue facultie and power thereof Whereas the Apostle saith the gift of God is eternall life Rom. 6. 23. The Rhemists take vpon them to correct the Apostles wordes saying thus The sequele of speech required that as he said Death or damnation is the stipend of sinne so life euerlasting is the stipend of iustice and so it is Rhemist Rom. 6. sect 8. What can be more contrarie to the Apostle then this Life euerlasting saith he is the gift of God Nay say they it is as properlie the stipend of righteousnes as damnation is the stipend of sinne but the Apostles declination from that sequele sheweth the contrarie Christes paines were of no account of their owne nature compared with his glory Rhemist Rom. 8. sect 5. A monsterous blasphemie and contrarie to scripture for if there were no comparison betweene Christes sufferinges and the glorie which he hath purchased for vs by them then his sufferinges were no satisfaction to Gods Iustice Wherefore his passion being the passion of the sonne of God was both a full satisfaction and a worthie desart of that glorie which hee hath obtained for vs Thou art worthie to take the booke and to open the seales thereof because thou was killed Reuelat. 5. sect 9. Christ therefore in respect of his passion did fully deserue all that glorie which hee hath obtayned for vs but there is no desert where there is not a proportion betweene the labour and the reward yet wee affirme not that Christ merited for him selfe for his owne glorification was due vnto him before the worlde was Iohn 17. 5. That our afflictions are meritorious of heauen Rom. 8. 18. Saint Paul sayth cleane contrary that the afflictions of this time are not worthy of the glory which shall be reuealed ibid. They deny that the Iewes did receiue the trueth or substance of Christ in their sacramentes as we doe in ours or that they and wee do eate and drinke of the selfesame meate and drinke Rhemist 1. Corinth 10. sect 2. and yet the Apostle saith plainely That they did all eate the same spirituall meate and all drinke the same spirituall drinke for they dranke of the spirituall rocke which followed them the rocke was Christ. ibid. Doth not the Apostle now say here that they did drinke the same spirituall drinke with vs for Christ was their spirituall drinke and so is he ours That where the Apostle sayth This is not to eate the Lords supper 1. Corinth 11. 20. Hee meaneth not the Sacrament which Christ instituted at supper but the feastes of loue which were vsed in the primitiue Church Rhemist ibid. And yet it is most manifest by the circumstance of the place that S. Paul reprooueth them for the abuses in the Lords supper and therefore putteth them in minde of the institution of Christ verse 23. which had beene a matter impertinent if hee in so saying the Lords supper had not meant the Sacrament That the force and efficacie of common prayer dependeth not vppon the peoples vnderstanding hearing or knowledge and that the infant idiote and vnlearned man taketh no lesse fruite of diuine office than any other Rhemist 14. sect 10. And therefore it is not repugnant to saint Paul to pray in the latine that is an vnknowen tongue ibid. sect 15. Yet in trueth S. Paul flatly condemneth the vsing of an vnknowen tongue in publike prayers and thankesgiuing Hee that occupieth the roome of the vnlearned can not say Amen at thy giuing of thankes seeing hee knoweth not what thou saiest for thou verilie giuest thankes well but the other is not edified And it followeth verse 19. I had rather in the Church speake fiue woordes with mine vnderstanding that I might instruct others then ten thousand words in a strange tongue What could haue beene spoken more plainely against the vse of an vnknowen and vnedifying tongue in the Church That man hath a proper freedome and motion in his thoughtes doings and all is not to be referred vnto God 1. Corinth 3. sect 2 Rhemist that man was neuer without free will but it is made onely more free by grace Rhemist Iohn 8. sect 2. That the Gentiles doe beleeue by their free will Act. 13. 2. All this is flat opposite to scripture Which saith wee are not able to thinke a good thought of our selues 2. Corinth 3. 5. And that God worketh in vs both the will and the deed Philipp 2. 13. That wee are not formally made iust by the righteousnesse of Christ imputed vnto vs but by a iustice inherent and resiant in vs. Concil Trident. sess 6. can 10. Rhemist Rom. 2. sect 4. yea they condemne it as hereticall to say that a man hath no iustice of his owne to be iustifyed by but the iustice onely of Christ Rhemist Philip. 3. sect 3. And yet S. Paul sayth thus in plaine termes That I might be found in him not hauing mine owne righteousnesse which is of the lawe but that which is through the faith of Christ euen the righteousnes which is of God through faith Philip. 2. 9. Here the Apostle refuseth his owne inherent righteousnesse and cleaueth onely to the imputatiue iustice of Christ to bee iustified by though wee denie not an inherent righteousnesse in the faithfull but imperfect not a meanes of their iustification before God but the fruites thereof and is no other but that which we call Sanctification They doe set vp Idols or images to bee adored and attribute vnto them religious worship contrarie to the scripture Children keepe your selues
much troubled about this question whether the Pope may be deposed for heresie Albert. Pighius holdeth that the Pope cannot be an heretike therefore not for any cause to be deposed Iohannes de Turre cremat is of opinion that the Pope for secrete heresie is actually deposed of God may be by the Church declared to be so deposed Others helde that the Pope neither for manifest nor secrete heresie either is actually or may be deposed Caietanus that the Pope for manifest heresie is not actually deposed but may be deposed by the Church There is a fifth opinion that the Pope being a manifest heretike doth cease of himself to be pope that he may be iudged by the Church yet they iudge not the Pope for he is now no Pope Iohan. Driedo Melchior Canus Bellarmine consenteth lib. 2. de Pontif. cap. 30. Concerning the popes temporal iurisdiction some of them teach that the pope by the worde of God hath full plenarie power in all matters both Ecclesiastical ciuill Augustin Triumphus Hostiensis Others that he hath not directly immediatly any temporal authoritie but only spiritual yet indirectly imediatly by reason of his spiritual power he hath chiefe authoritie also in temporal matters Sic Iohan. Driedo Iohan. de Turre cremat Pighius Caietanus Bellar. lib. 5. de Pontif. ca. 1. They are much busied about the Councel of the Iewes that condemned Christ whether it erred or not Some hold that the question was de facto non de iure not by what right Christ should be put to death but they consulted only of the fact to put him to death therefore in a matter of fact might erre Others think that they erred in their own mind affectioÌ„ toward Christ not in the sentence for Christ was worthie of death bearing our sinnes But Bellar. is of an opinioÌ„ by himself that the Councel did erre for they were priuileged only froÌ„ error before Christs coÌ„ming not afterward li. 2. de Concil ca. 8. Thus they wearie theÌ„selues in their owne foolish conceits Some think that generall Councels cannot erre though they haue not the Popes confirmation so the diuines of Paris Others hold the cleane coÌ„trarie that they may as Caietanus Turrecremat Bellar. li. 2. de concil c. 11. Some hold opinion that a general Councel is aboue the Pope Nichol. Cusanus Panormitanus Abulensis So also it was concluded in the Councels of Constance Basile The Canonists teach that the Pope by right is aboue the Church Councels but he may if he please submit himself to their iudgement giue them authoritie ouer him But others think that he hath such an absolute authoritie that he cannot submit himself to the sentence or censure of Councels though he would So Antoninus Iohan. de Turre cremat Caietanus Pigghius with others vnto this Bellarm. subscribeth the Popes waged champion to fight for his triple crowne Alphons de Castro is of opinion that heretikes are members of the Church Bellarm. bestoweth some labour to confute his opinion Thus one Papist maketh worke for another Bellarm. de Eccl. li. 3. ca. 4. Iohan. de Turre cremat requireth faith as necessarie to make a true member of the Church which is a true sound opinion but he is confuted by Bellarm. who holdeth faith in this case to be needlesse li. 3. de Eccl. ca. 10. Iohannes de Turre cremat saith it is against the Catholike faith to affirm that the faith of the Church did not only rest or was preserued in the virgin Marie in the passioÌ„ of Christ Bellar. thinketh that faith was preserued as well in the Apostles as in Marie that theirs failed no more than hers li. 3. de Eccles. ca. 17. And herein the Iesuite coÌ„meth nearest the truth The Apostles faith was not lost but greatly shaken at the death of Christ and they remained wauering doubtful til they were by Christ risen again confirmed Some affirme that the vow of continencie or single life is annexed to priesthod by the law of God Iohan. Maior Clictouaeus Others that it is not grounded vpon the diuine law but onely brought in by the constitution and decree of the Church and may be dispensed withall Tho. Aquinas Caietanus so thinketh also Bellarm. de clericis lib. 1. ca. 18. The Canonistes holde that the constitution of tithes euen in respect of the quantitie proportion of the tenth is established by the law of God therefore cannot be altered to any other quantitie Bellarm. calleth it an error of the Canonists confuteth it determining the matter thus that the paiment of tithes is De iure diuino quoad substantiam non quoad quantitatem is by the word warranted in respect of the substance or equitie not in regard of the precise quantitie de Clericis lib. 1. cap. 25. The Canonists hold that clergie men are exempt from the power of secular Princes not only in Ecclesiastical but in politike ciuill affaires by the law of God Others affirme that they are freede their persons their goods onely by humane constitution Franciscus Victoria Dominicus a Soto and Bellarm. de Clericis lib. 1. cap. 28. Scotus did hold that venial sinnes were remitted in the verie instant of the separation of the soule from the bodie but they were remitted per merita prâ—cedentia by vertue of the merites which went before in the life Tho. Aquinas held the contrarie that they were not remitted then but afterward in Purgatorie To this agreeth Bellarmine and the rest Bellar. libâ—â— de Purg. ca. 10. Some Papistes holde that the soules in Purgatorie are vncertaine of their saluation and though they shalbe saued yet they know it not Dyoâ—is Carthusianus Michael Baij but the general opinion of the Papists now is that they are certaine of their saluation Bellarm. de Purg. lib. 2. ca. 4. Some of them thinke that veniall sinnes by nature deserue eternall death that they are but venial of Gods mercie wherein they holde the truth for the stipend of all sin is death Rom. 6. 25. so Michael Baij Gerson Iohan Roffens But now the Iesuits generally hold the contrarie that venial sinnes are pardonable of their own nature Bellarm. ibid. Some are of opinion that prayers may be made for soules that are in Hell Bellarmine generally all that rable holde it onely to be lawfull to pray for soules in Purgatorie But the truth is the dead are not to be praied for at all Bellarm. de Purg. lib. 2. ca. 5. The papistes generally hold that the soules which neede no â—lensing in purgatorie do streight-waies go to heauen yet Bellarmine hath a trick by himself thinketh it not improbable that there should be another place not so ful of ioy as heauen is nor in paine equal to purgatorie li. 2. de Purg. ca. 7. But we acknowledge neither the one nor the other for Scripture no where maketh mention of moe places than heauen hell Th. Aquinas holdeth that the least