Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	apostle_n	sin_n	wage_n	4,685	5	10.8916	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A07898	The regiment of the Church as it is agreable with Scriptures, all antiquities of the Fathers, and moderne writers, from the Apostles themselues, vnto this present age.	Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.	1606 (1606)	STC 1827; ESTC S101485	157,812	234

is sinne this day as odious in Gods sight as euer it was and remaineth punishable by the law Morall which is the law of Nature more fullie explained in the Law of the Newe Testament but the quantitie kinde of punishment therein omitted by reason of the mutabilitie of times places and persons is wholly referred to the discretion of the wise Godly Magistrate This conclusion containeth in it three parts the expiration of the Mosaicall law Gods wrath and indignation against sinne the quantitie kinde of punishing sinne which is cōmitted to the Magistrate The first part is sufficiently cleered by the context of the former cōclusion The second part may be prooued by manie places of holie writ For as th' Apostle saith Tribulation anguish shal be vpon the soule of euery man that doth euill of the Iew first also of the Graecian Again in another place the wages of sinne is death Again therefore shall her plagues come at one day death and sorrowe and famine and shee shall bee burnt with fire for that God which condemneth her is a strong Lord. And Christ himselfe sheweth his generall hatred against sinne when hee pronounceth life eternall to be prepared for the righteous and euerlasting paine for the wicked The third and last part is proued two waies affirmatiuely and negatiuely Of the former speaketh S. Paul when hee telleth vs That the Magistrate is not to be feared for good workes but for euil Where hee rendreth the reason thereof vz. for that he is Gods Minister to take vengeance on him that doth euill Of the same speaketh Saint Peter when hee affirmeth the magistrate to bee appointed of God for the punishment of euill doers and for the prayse of them that doe well Touching the latter there is no parte in the whole corpse of the new testament or of the old this day in force which determineth eyther the quantitie or kinde of punishment with the which male factors are to bee punished This negatiue assertion is proofe sufficient vntill some instance can bee giuen for the affirmatiue Againe as the Prophets containe nothing but an explication of the Law so the New Testament containeth nothing but a cleare explication of the law and the Prophetes This I haue elsewhere proued at large where hee that listeth may reade the same for all the kindes of punishment expressed in the Mosaicall Law were meere iudiciall and are alreadie expired as is proued in the former conclusion The law Moral which is the law of nature teacheth vs that sinne ought to be punished but for that no one kinde of punishment not quantity in punishing can be meet and agreeable to all nations all times all places and al persons it leaueth the quantitie and kinde of punishment to bee determined by the godly and prudent Magistrate as shall bee thought most fit and commodious for the peaceable gouernement of the common weale the circumstances of times places and persons euer dulie considered this is euident by the practise of all nations for as M. Caluin writeth truely where Gods law the law of nature forbiddeth to steale the ancient lawes of the gentiles punished theft with double others condemned theues with exile and bannishment others adiudged them to be whipped others to be put to death False witnes was punished in som places onely with infamie in other places with hanging All lawes doe reuenge murder with blood but yet with diuers kinds of death In some places there are grieuouser paines appointed for adulterers in other places those that are more easie yet wee see how they all by this diuersitie of punishment tend to one and the same end For they all with one consent giue sentence of punishment against those offences which are condemned by the eternall lawe of god to wit murder theft adulterie false witnes but they agree not all in the manner of the punishment neithe truely is it necessarie or expedient that they should agree therein Their is a countrey which should out of hand be destroied with theues and slaughter if it did not with horible example deale verie sharpely with murderers There is also some time which requireth the enlarging of the sharpnes of punishment and some people verie prone to some certaine sinne vnlesse they be with great rigour kept in awe he is then very euill affected and enuieth the publike commoditie that is offended with this diuersitie which is most meete to retaine the obseruatiō of the law of God Thus writeth M. Caluin adding much more to the like effect which I omit in regard of breuitie referring the reader to the place out of whose words I note first that all nations who haue as S. Paule recordeth the law of nature ingrafted in their harts did not agree in the kind of punishing sin but vsed some one kind some another Secondly that theft murder false witnesse adulterie and such like haue not one and the same kinde of punishment in euerie people natiō Thirdly that addultery is punished in some places sharply in other som places more gentlie Fourthly that his diuersitie of the kinds of punishment is not onely godly and lawfull but also expedient and necessarie And so I conclude that the law morall which onely law is now in force doth leaue the quantitie and kinde of punishment to be determined by the ciuill Magistrate The third Conclusion Emperours and Empresses Kinges and Queenes absolute Princes and independant Magistrats may lawfully in certaine causes vpon good and godlie considerations either tolerate sinne vnpunished or pardon male factors For the exact handling of this conclusion because it is a matter of great importāce very necessary for many respects I deem it operapretiū agreable to the time in which we liue to lay down some strōg foundations in that behalfe First this is a constant Axiome approued by vniform assent of al learned diuines Cess inte fine legis cessat lex ipsa When the finall cause or end for which the law was made ceaseth then doth the law of necessitie also cease This foundation is grounded vpon the holy scripture where by the flat decree and setled law of the apostles wee are bounde to abstaine frō blood strangled meates This notwithstanding no man hath this day anie scruple of conscience to eate the same yet hereof no other sound reason can be yeelded saue onely that the end for which that law was made did lōg sithēce cease For euē at that time was no precise necessitie to abstaine from blood and strangled meates But this law was onely made in respect of the state of that time that the Gentiles and the Iewes might liue more peaceably together there by avoid all occasion of contention and quarreling And I therefor so soone as that end ceased the law also ceased with it and so we are this day freede from the same yea this Axiome is euident lumine