these Scriptures show in the Margent viz. the Church at Jerusalem Samaria Cesaria Philippi Coloss Corinth Rome Galatia Ephesus c. To conclude If the Churches of Christ were so planted and constituted in the Primitive Times they ought to be so still unless any can shew where Christ hath since that altered the Constitution of his Churches 3ly This Ordinance cannot concern Infants but Believers because it 's a testification of the Remission of Sins and Salvation to the worthy Receiver and Subject of it Acts 2.38 Mark 16.16 else why doth Peter promise remission of Sin and the Gift of the Holy Ghost to such And why did our Lord join Faith Baptism and Salvation all in one Verse Baptism is never enjoined as a Means of Remission of Sins and Eternal Life but something of Duty Choice and Sanctity is joined with it in order to the production of the End so mentioned Dr. Taylor but that the Ordinance should be a Pledg to the Believer of those great things We collect as much from Acts 22.16 where Ananias exhorted Paul to arise and be baptized and wash away his Sins that is put that Duty in practice which will be a Confirmation of thy Justification so we understand Peter The like Figure whereunto Baptism doth now save us viz. As the Ark was the instrumental way of God's saving Noah by his Grace 1 Pet. 3.20 Baptism is our Marriage-Ring Military Press-mony our ingrafting into Christ our Badg and Cognizance our Ship our Ark our Red-Sea our putting on Christ Dan. Rogers so Faith in Christ's Death and Resurrection is the way God saves our Souls this being confirmed unto us in the Figure of Baptism as well as at the Lord's Table But what have Infants to do with this who are not capable to take in the Comfort exhibited and held forth in it This is Meat for strong Men not Babes 4ly Believers only must be the Subjects of this Ordinance because it holds forth a Covenant the Subject makes actually with God Hence saith the Apostle Rom. 6.3 Know you not as many as were baptized into Christ were baptized into his Death as if he should say In that Ordinance you did covenant and promise to die unto Sin and live a new Life Therefore saith he how can you that are dead to Sin live any longer therein And this you have profess'd in your Baptism as in the words of the Institution Gossops and Sureties are no where found in Holy Scripture but in the Pope's Decree and Common-Prayer Book Which the Parliament in K. Edward the 6th's time confessed There was no other difference between that and the Mass-Book only a few things left out but that one was in Latin the other in English Fox's Acts Mon. Edit 9. Vol. 2. Book 9. p. 14 15. the whole Trinity gives it self unto the Believer So he dedicates himself voluntarily to the Service of the whole Trinity Father Son and Spirit In all Covenants of this Nature there is required the Information of the Judgment Consent of the Will it must be an Act of Choice As the Eunuch said See here is Water what hinders me to be baptized But none of these things are agreeable to an Infant and as they are not able to enter into Covenant themselves if others do it for them 't is not only Unscriptural but Antiscriptural Can Persons covenant to keep others from Sin when they find it too hard a work to keep themselves 5ly Baptism is a lively representation of Regeneration therefore can only affect Believers The Apostle alludes unto Baptism when he speaks of the washing of Regeneration Titus 3.5 His meaning is that the Ordinance is a lively Badg Symbol and Sign of Regeneration and the New Birth The Apostle to the Colossians Ch. 2.12 tells them That their Baptism did exhibit and shew forth their being dead and risen with Christ through that Faith which was of that Omnipotent Operation which raised Christ from the Dead but no Signs of Regeneration appear in Infants at Baptism that is untruly said Saith the Papist to the Prelat You prove that Sacraments convey Grace in the very Act as we assert for just before Baptism the Child was an Heir of Hell and Child of Wrath but being baptized it is Regenerated and born again as your Common-Prayer Book saith in the Common-Prayer Book after the Child is sprinkled Forasmuch as this Child is regenerated and born again which just before was acknowledged to be a Child of Wrath and an Heir of Hell We say tho God hath promised his Presence in all his Appointments yet we also say Persons are not to be Baptized that they may be Regenerated but to hold forth and signify Regeneration therefore Baptism can no ways affect little Infants CHAP. V. Contains the Answer of Objections Objection 1. FEW Learned Men own this way of Baptizing only a few mechanick poor illiterate Persons I Answer The Apostle saith Not many wise Men after the Flesh are called 1 Cor. 1.24 29. Christ did not ordinarily make use of the learned Rabbies among the Jews to preach the Gospel but rather those who were counted illiterate and ignorant that no Flesh might glory in his Presence God gets the more praise by making use of Babes and Sucklings Christ thanks the Father Psal 8.2 that Divine Things were hid from the Wise and Prudent such as the World so accounted Mat. 11.27 and revealed unto Babes because they would render the Glory unto God while the worldly wise Men would take it to themselves 2. Those who have the most humane Literature are no Rule but God's Word we must follow Paul no further than he follows Christ 3. The Holy Scriptures account no Man truly Wise and Learned but those taught of God and that keep his Commands Psal 111.10 The Learned Pharisees and Expounders of the Law rejected the Counsel of God against themselves in not being Baptized 4. Are there no Learned of this Practice What think you of St. Augustine See Danvers on Baptism p. 60 61 62 63. Many of those born of Christian Parents Basil Gregory Nazianzen Jerom Ambrose Chrysostom Constantine Theodosius Paul and as the Crown of all our Lord Jesus were all these Illiterate and Ignorant Object 2. The Children of Believers are in the Covenant They say the Foederati were to be the Signati therefore ought to have the Seal of the Covenant Baptism I Answer There is but two ways of being in the Covenant Absolutely or Conditionally Let it first be proved the Infant-Seed of Believers are in Covenant then 2ly if so that they ought to be baptized Female Children under the Law had a legal or federal Holiness yet not to be Circumcised No Believer dare say all his Infant-Seed are in the Covenant of Grace absolutely for then they must all be saved but we see Abraham had an Ishmael Isaac an Esau David an Absalom Samuel Sons of Belial c. so that they cannot
a secret Design to decry the Holy Scriptures crying up the Power of Godliness in Word to undermine the Form of Godliness cry up Faith and Justification by Faith to lessen Repentance and a holy Life crying out against the Error of all Churches and under that pretence leave the true Church and the Communion of Saints until at last they have lost the Church in the Wilderness the ready way to lose themselves too if Grace prevent not which I desire may CHAP. VI. Contains the Vse 1. IF it be their Duty who believe to be Baptized then I infer those who are not capable of this Grace of Faith are under no Divine Obligation nor their Parents neither to Baptize them 't is only a piece of Will-worship which God never required Col. 2.23 If any reckon themselves obliged to Baptize or be Baptized from Mens Authority let such baptize in their Name of whom they have this Authority and not join the Name of Christ with humane Inventions Baptism of Infants was not practised for near 300 Years after Christ nor enjoined as necessary till 400 Years after Christ. Magdeburgh Hist Cent. 5. p. 835. Danvers on Baptim p. 105 106 107 108 109. Infant-Baptism was hardly heard of till about three hundred Years after Christ Augustine was the first that preached it necessary in his heat against Pelagius Bishop of Rome who denied Original Sin which Augustine supposed to be taken away in Baptism about the 5th Century it was confirmed and decreed by the Pope and his Council in the Milevetan Council a Province in Africa 2. Is Faith to precede Baptism Then how irregular do they act who baptize first before the Subject hath any Grace and know not whether ever they will Our Lord knew how he placed his words when he said Believe and be baptized and for Persons to act contrary reflects upon the Wisdom of Christ as though they knew it were better to Baptize first whatever the Lord said to the contrary 3. Is Faith to precede Baptism Then we infer those who are in this practice are very unjustly called Anabaptists Persons Baptized in Infancy are to be Baptized after they believe which is not to be esteemed Rebaptization but right Baptism as Peter Bruce the great Waldensian Martyr Rebaptizers We know but of one Baptism Ephes 4. and that is Believers having the Broad-Seal and Stamp of Divine Authority upon it how in derision are such called Catabaptists as if they were against Baptism because they plead for Christ's Institution against Mens Inventions 4. Is Faith to precede Baptism Then we infer they are greatly Heterodox who assert that Baptism works Regeneration by the very * Some call it Opus operatum Act altho we doubt not of the concurrence of the Holy Spirit to strengthen and comfort God's People in the Way of their Duty But to say the very Act works it is not allowable forasmuch as Regeneration is required before it and this Sacrament is a Sign and Signification of Regeneration therefore called by the Apostle the washing of Regeneration Tit. 3.5 Death to Sin and Sanctification is figured out in this Ordinance when Persons are buried with Christ in Baptism Rom. 6.4 Grotius saith in his Annotations upon Matth. 19. The Synod of Neocesarea decreed a Woman with Child might be Baptized because it reached not the Fruit of the Womb forasmuch as in Baptism each one 's free choice is shewed 5. Are Persons to believe before Baptism Then an actual personal Faith is to precede this Ordinance 't is not the Faith of the Church nor an imputative Faith of the Parents in Covenant nor the Faith of the Gossips or Sureties can be a sufficient Argument for any Minister to Baptize but a profession of their own Faith as Philip required of the Eunuch Act. 8.37 And whereas some assert Infants have Faith what they may have is not known by any Sign appears in them See Dr. Duveil on Acts 8. And for personal and actual Faith they have none which the Commission requires as prerequisite to Baptism And for any to assert Infants have Faith or any other inspired Habit may we not say with Dr. Taylor such are constrained to answer this without Revelation against Reason common Sense and all the Experience in the World no greater Advantage can be desired against such a Position 6. Is Faith to be professed before we are Baptized Then we infer those that have suffered in defence of this Doctrine had a good Foundation for what they did The Waldensian Christians suffered Imprisonment Danvers on Baptism p. 113 114. confiscation of Goods and some Death Many in Germany Holland Flanders Vienna Mentz the Palatinate for their opposing Pedo-Baptism and asserting Believers II. Let all Believers be exhorted to obey Christ who yet lie short of their Duty the King or Subject Pastor or People Learned or Illiterate for the King of Kings hath done it the great Shepheard of the Sheep and he who is only wise If any Object I was Baptized in my Infancy I Answer As one saith of Marriage It 's not the Bed that maketh Marriage for then Fornication is Marriage but it 's a lawful Consent by Covenant So I say of Baptism It 's not a little Water sprinkled upon the Face makes Baptism but also Consent and Subjection to Christ's Command When thou wast an Infant Mr. Baxter saith Entring Covenant with God is the essential point of Baptism without it it is not Baptism Children cannot Covenant Sureties neither by the Law of God nor Nature ought not Parents by the Canon Law must not thou gavest no Consent but rather Dissent by crying when the Water was scatter'd upon thy Face thou hadst no Faith no Love no active Obedience thy Judgment not informed thy Will and Affections not inclined but wholly passive in the thing Dr. Barlow saith In the Primitive Times Persons were first Catecumini then Illuminati or Baptizati If Matter and Form be wanting the Essence of the Oâ—â—inance is 〈…〉 like a Stock or Stone so that thou art not yet Baptized because there wanted then the very Essence of the Ordinance which is right Matter and Form as for Matter an ignorant Infant was the Subject in the room of an understanding Believer For the Form Sprinkling instead of Dipping so that thy Infant-Baptism is a meer non entity and nothing The Church of the Rome confesseth she changed Dipping into Sprinkling Cyprian is the first who pleads for Baptizing the Sick by Sprinkling and for Sprinkling new Converts in the Prison-House Danvers p. 204 205 206. Magd. Cent. 3. C. 6. p. 126. By degrees they brought it in for Sick Children then for all Children Rome's first and great Argument Novatians and Donatists against Infant-Baptism by which Infant-Baptism was brought in was their imagining it took away Original-Sin Upon which they made this Canon in the Milevetan Council It is our Will Too many are very tenacious of this
that hath Christ's Authority stamp'd upon it tho it were the blowing of Rams-horns round the Walls of Jericho Josh 6.13 Exod. 20.24 25. Making an Altar of Earth or rough Stone taking the Blood of the Trespass-Offering putting it on the Lap of the High-Priest's right Ear Levit. 8.24 the Thumb of the right Hand the great Toe of the right Foot having on it a Divine Stamp is an Argument sufficient for our Obedience Acts 9.18 St. Paul a very learned Man the Eunuch who was Lord Treasurer under Candace Queen of Ethiopia Crispus a chief Ruler Constantine and Theodosius great Emperors our Lord the only Potentate accounted it so honourable a thing as to practise it when about thirty Years of Age and led us the way as well by his Example as Commission Nothing sure can be more obliging Believers unto Obedience than their Saviour's Precept and Precedent CHAP. III. What Baptism is FIrst Negatively Not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 28.18 19 20. It 's not sprinkling dropping or pouring of Water Sprinkling is known to be Rantising not Baptising or Baptism Baptism is an external washing plunging or dipping a profest Believer in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost Which I thus demonstrate The Hebrew word Tabal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dip. The Septuagint translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Dr. Hammond notes on John 13.10 Gen. 37.31 Levit. 4.6 Deut. 33.24 2 Kings 5.14 Josh 3.15 1. From the Scripture-acceptation of the Word the word Baptize in the New Testament is taken from the word Dip in the Old as the Learned do know Where 't is said Joseph 's Coat was dipt in Blood The Priest's Finger dipt in Blood Asher 's Foot dipt in Oil. The Priests Feet dipt in Jordan Naaman wash'd or dipt seven times in the same River with many more places of Scripture ☞ Moreover 't is worth our noting the word translated Dip John 13.26 Rev. 19.13 Luke 16.24 concerning the Sop Judas had And where it 's said Christ's Vesture was dipt in Blood it is from the same Original word Baptism is that our Translators might had they pleased have rendred the word Baptizing Dipping being from the same Theme Bapto as Baptism is We are much to be governed by the Common and Vulgar acceptation of words as they were used and understood among all Nations God so inspired the Prophets and Apostles to deliver his Mind always in such words as were understood among the vulgar and ordinary People or else they would have been Barbarians unto them We cannot understand each other in Discourse but this way I call for a Book it 's readily given me because every one knows what it is we call a Book So if Tabal were used among the Hebrews for Dip in the common Acceptation and the Learned Hebrews by the Order of Ptolomy King of Egypt did translate that word Baptizo which was commonly accepted for Dip among the Grecians and we also translate Baptizo Dip none but an Enthusiast will object against the common acceptation of words This puts me in mind of a Discourse between Bishop Vsher and Mr. Hanserd Knowllys about the Propriety of the word Baptizo the Bishop said it signified to sprinkle as well as dip Mr. Knowllys said it signified only to dip there being other words in the Greek for sprinkling and pouring 'T is observable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to wash 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to pour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to sprinkle are never taken or used for Dip or Baptize nor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 simply taken for Washing by sprinkling or pouring Danvers on Baptism p. 206. To end this Controversy those who could produce the best and most Authors for their Sense should carry it the Bishop after some search found Two for his Opinion Mr. Knowllys brings Seventy for his Two namely the Septuagint and so the Controversy ended The Writings of the most Learned of the contrary Mind do confess that the Original Word * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence Baptism is taken signifieth properly to dip Leigh's Critica Sacra saith The native signification of the Word is to dip into or plunge under Water as the Dyer dips his Cloth in his Fat 's The Book of Canons saith You shall dip c. So the Dutch translate the Word In those Days came John the Dipper Ende doc Jesus ghe Doope was quam hysterstont vanden Water and when Jesus was dipt he came out of the Water Calvin saith We see what Fashion the Ancients had to Administer Baptism for they plunged the whole Body into Water 2. The end of the Ordinance sheweth Baptism to be dipping which is to hold forth unto a Believer the Death Burial and Resurrection of Christ as the Apostle saith Rom. 6.4 We are buried with him in Baptism Although there be no manner of similitude and likeness between Christ's Death and Burial with sprinkling a little Water on the Face yet burying in the Water is as lively a Similitude and Likeness of Jesus Christ's Death as the breaking Bread and pouring out the Wine is at the Lord's Table So that they lose one great End of this Ordinance who Rantize instead of Baptize for no Man accounts him buried who hath only Earth cast on his Face but he who is in the Heart of the Earth and covered with the same 3. John the beloved Disciple gives this as the Reason why John the Baptist baptized in Enon John 3.23 because there was much Water there the place was commodious for that Ordinance Hence our blessed Saviour came from Galilee to Jordan From Galilee to Jordan where John baptized is about thirty or forty miles to be baptized of him there which if Sprinkling would have done there had been no need of much Water nor Rivers 4. That Baptism is Dipping appears from Scripture-Metaphors explaining it Luke 15.50 Our Lord's Sufferings are called a Baptism because his Pains were not only upon one part of his Body No such thing as Sprinkling or Rantizing used in the Apostles Days nor many Ages after Mede's Diatribe but his whole Soul and Body was baptized and plunged into Sorrows Thus one that is Baptized is plunged under Water to shew how Christ was Baptized and plunged into Sorrows for Man's sake Great Measures of the Spirit are also discovered by Persons being said to be Baptized with the Spirit Acts 1.5 for where the word Baptism is used whether it be joined with Suffering with the Spirit or with Water it always holds forth a great quantity either of Sufferings of the Spirit or Water 5. Hence in the 5th place The vast height of Waters which stood above the Church in the Red Sea like a high Wall is called 1 Cor. 10.2 3. A Baptism unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea because encompassed with it for the Ordinance of Baptism was not then in force but
Circumcision therefore cannot be meant God's Ordinance of Baptism but sheweth the great Care God had of his Church that as he fed them miraculously and gave them Water out of a Rock in the Wilderness Baptism signifieth properly plunging in Water or washing by dipping Dr. Taylor 's Rule of Conscience so he did not leave them in the Red Sea but incompass'd them about by his Divine Providence with Water and the Cloud as Persons are encompassed with that Element when Baptized Hence in the 6th place Baptism is explained by the Metaphor of a Garment which the Apostle refers unto when he calls Baptism a putting on Christ Gal. 3.27 As the Servant by his Lord's Livery declares whose he is so the long white Robe of Baptism sheweth us to be the Servants of the Lord Jesus 7. Baptism is not only called a Washing by Ananias and Peter Acts 22.16 1 Pet. 3.21 Tit. 3.5 but the washing of the Soul in Regeneration is held forth in this Symbol and Sign Austin and Paulinus in the 7th Century in England Baptized great Multitudes in the River Trent and Swale Hence saith Mr. Fox there was no use of Fonts then Fox's Acts and Monuments 9 Edit Vol. 1. p. 132. by the Apostle Paul when he speaks of the washing of Regeneration unto Titus Now we know every Faculty of the Soul is washed in the Blood of Christ and every Faculty sanctified by the Holy Spirit not a part of the Faculties but all the Faculties therefore wisely set forth by Baptism wherein not only a part but the whole Body is wash'd and cleansed in Water 8. This is further cleared from the practice of the most pure Apostolick Times 'T is said of our most blessed Lord Jesus That he went up out of the Water Mat. 3.15 16 17. which in common sense signifies He first went down not only to the Water but into the Water and came up out of the Water Of Philip and the Eunuch 't is said Acts 8.36 40. They went down both not only to the Water but into the Water and came up out of the Water if Sprinkling would have done they need only go to and come from it but they knew the Commission could not be answered unless they went down into the Water The Minister is to dip in Water as the meetest Act the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 notes it Rogers on the Sacrament Thus you see the Places where the Apostles Baptized were in Rivers and where was much Water You see their Act and Posture they went down into the Water you see their End was to exhibit and shew forth Christ's Death Burial and Resurection If any should ask Why Sprinkling will not do as well as Dipping I answer 1. Because that is another thing than Christ hath commanded and 't is high presumption to change God's Ordinances Isa 24.5 Tho there was no more virtue in the Waters of Jordan than of Damascus yet Naaman must keep to God's Appointment 2. In so doing we lose the End of the Ordinance which as aforesaid is to shew forth the Death and Resurrection of Christ 3. We must keep the Ordinances as they were delivered unto us 1 Cor. 11.2 'T is a known Maxim to practise any thing in the Worship of God as an Ordinance of his without an Institution ought to be esteemed Will-worship Idolatry And that there is a necessity for Scripture-Authority to warrant every Ordinance and Practice in Divine Worship is owned by Luther Austin Calvin Basil Theoph. Tertul Mr. Ball and in the 6th Article of the Church of England also Bellarmine as Moses was to make all things according to the Pattern shewed him in the Mount. 4. God is a Jealous God and stands upon small things in Matters of Worship Had Moses and Aaron but lifted up a Tool upon the Altar of ruff Stone to beautify it they would have polluted it because contrary to the Command 5. This hath no likeness to the holy Examples of Christ and his Apostles CHAP. IV. Shewing that professing Believers and them only are the proper Subjects of Baptism Which I demonstrate FIrst From Gospel-Precept Our Text saith He that believeth and is baptized Erasmus saith 'T is no where in the Apostles Writings Infants were baptized The parallel Text Mat. 28. is worthy of consideration by way of Division The Commission is Go the Subjects spoken to are his Apostles the Matter of it is to teach and baptize the Extent of it is into all the World not only in hot Countries but in Cold. The Order in this Commission is first to teach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then after taught and discipellized to baptize them Therefore to baptize them We meet with no Example in Scripture for baptizing Infants Magd. Hist Cent. 1. L. 2. p. 196. before taught is quite contrary to the Command The words of Institution in whose Name it is to be done is the glorious Trinity in the Name of Father Son and Holy Spirit this must be some great thing which is done by so great Authority Unto this is annexed a glorious Promise of Divine Presence not only to the End of that Age but the End of the World * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and to put us out of all doubt about it 't is back'd with an Asseveration Amen so it shall be Finally here is a Note of Observation Lo our Lord would not have so great a Commission and Promise disregarded therefore saith he Lo that is observe what I have said wherever you find the word Lo Mark or Behold you will always find something very considerable it relates unto in the Context Now in pursuance of this Commission Peter exhorted the Murderers of Christ when they were convicted and cried out What shall we do he saith Repent and be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the Remission of Sins and ye shall receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost 2ly This appears from Gospel-Precedent and Example the Apostles in pursuance of their Commission baptize none else but such Hence John the Baptist tells the Pharisees and Sadduces which came to his Baptism As Isaac was brought forth by the Word of Promise so must we be born of the Word of God which only makes Baptism powerful and effectual Magd. Cent. 5. p. 363. they must first bring forth Fruit meet for or to amendment of Life and not to think the old Argument for Circumcision that Abraham was their Father would give them a right to Gospel-Ordinances It 's not the Faith of Parents gives Children a right to the Seals of the New Covenant but a personal Faith hence Philip would not baptize the Eunuch but upon profession of Faith In a word all the Primitive Churches were constituted and planted upon this Foundation-Principle Heb. 6.1 2. Acts 2.41 Chap. 8.12 Chap. 16.14 Coloss 2.10 Acts 18.8 Rom. 6.4 Gal. 3.26 Acts 19.1 2 3. Ephes 4.4 as
Christians 'T is most likely those who baptize Infants baptize Heathens for we are all the Children of Wrath by Nature Eph. 2.3 It is you plead for Baptizing Heathens we plead for Baptizing Believers and Christians Object 11. There is no express Command for Womens receiving the Lord's Supper yet there may be good Consequences to prove it lawful so of Infant-Baptism I Answer Who will say there 's no Command for Women's communicating so long as that stands upon Record 1 Cor. 11.28 But let a Man examine himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Common Gender and so let him eat The Learned do know the original word signifieth Man or Woman The Apostle saith There 's one Mediator between God and Man 1 Tim. 2.5 the word signifieth Man or Woman Gal. 3.28 Male or Female all one in Christ it is the same word with the former in the Original Moreover we read of Women who believed and were Baptized Acts 8.12 so are fitly qualified for the Lord's Table We have also an Example of Women's communicating in Act. 1.13 14. we read Mary and other Women with the rest of the Disciples were altogether And in Act. 2.44 it 's said all that believed were together and in ver 42. these continued stedfastly in the Apostles Doctrine and in Fellowship and in breaking of Bread and in Prayer So that here is a Command and an Example for Womens communicating tho none for Infants Baptism therefore the Objection is false and weak Object 12. Infants are Disciples therefore they may be Baptized I Answer This Objection being grounded on Act. 15.10 11. we shall shew the Occasion and Scope of it and see whether it can prove Infants Disciples or that they ought to be Baptized Some having asserted who came from Judea Vnless a Man was Circumcised he could not be saved Then the Church of Antioch determined that Paul and Barnabas with certain of the Church should go to Jerusalem to the Apostles and Elders concerning this Question which when they came together to consider this Matter Peter rose up and said Why tempt you God to put a Yoke upon the Necks of the Disciples Acts 15.10 This proves not Infants Disciples neither that they ought to be baptized which neither our Fathers nor we were able to bear The Meaning of the Apostle is Why should we impose the Yoke of Circumcision upon the Necks of the Disciples viz. Believing Gentiles which are by no Law obliged unto it this is to bring us unto that Bondage God hath delivered us from Now how this doth prove Infants Disciples and so ought to be Baptized I leave to all judicious Considerers Object 13. Circumcision nor Vncircumcision avails any thing but a New Creature We fear Persons lay too much stress upon Circumstantials not minding the Power of Godliness I Answer Those who lay too much stress upon Circumstantials 't is doubtless their Evil But can any lay more stress upon it than our Saviour who though unspotted yet would not live without it Tho Circumcision be nothing which is abolished is Baptism nothing which is called Righteousness and the Counsel of God and calls it Righteousness The laying the stress of our Happiness upon Christ should not hinder but further Obedience and always doth where the Faith is of the right Kind And whereas the Apostle saith Circumcision avails not any thing it did avail something when God threatned Moses with Death for not circumcising his Son Exod. 4. And when God said Whoever was not Circumcised should be cut off from among the People Gen. 17.14 The Apostle never intended to undermine Gospel-Commands by saying Circumcision nor Vncircumcision avails any thing for in 1 Cor. 7.19 he adds but the keeping the Commands of God What tho Circumcision is nothing because abolished is Believers Baptism nothing which is a standing Ordinance What tho some Jews might lay more stress upon Circumcision than upon the Lord Jesus for Salvation which might be the principal Cause of the Apostle's thus speaking I hope Persons have more charity than to conclude we lay more stress upon Baptism than our Lord's Merits Object 14. If Children may not be Baptized under the Gospel their Priviledg is less than under the Law I Answer The Priviledg under the Law and under the Gospel is the same to Infants as to the Covenant of Grace and as for Circumcision it was indeed a Priviledg to the Jews in comparison of the Heathens but called a Yoke in comparison of them under the Gospel We grant Why should this be esteemed the loss of a Priviledg more than not enjoying literally a holy Land a holy City Temple or Succession of a High Priest and Priesthood by Generation it 's a great Mercy for Children to have Godly Parents having the advantage of a good Education Prayer and good Examples But what benefit can Infants have from Baptism when God never appointed it for them nor made any Promise to them in it but most glorious ones are made to such as believe and are baptized namely Remission of Sins the Gift of the Holy Ghost and Eternal Salvation Mark 16.16 Object 15. The Children of Believers are Holy therefore they ought to be Baptized I Answer By explaining the Scripture upon which the Objection is grounded 1 Cor. 7.14 The Apostle is here giving an answer to a Case of Conscience that is Whether it were lawful for the believing Husband or Wife to leave or depart from the unbelieving Wife or Husband The Apostle in the Negative answers By no means for these Reasons First Now your Children are Holy viz. lawfully begotten in Wedlock but if the Husband leaves the Wife The Greek Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is well translated to by the Geneva or Wife the Husband every one will count your Children unclean that is Bastards therefore don't part but live together because the unbelieving Husband is sanctified or set apart by God's Ordinance to the use of the Wife and the Wife to the use of the Husband in a matrimonial way 1 Cor. 7.14 This is not an inherent spiritual nor a federal Holiness as some would beg and therefore argue for Baptism this Holiness is a legitimate Holiness And there can be no more concluded because these Children are said to be Holy therefore to be baptized than the Baptizing Zacharias's Bells or Pots in the Lord's House because they are said to be Holy Zach. 14.20 Object 16. All Nations are to be Baptized Infants are a part of the Nation Ergo Infants may be baptized I Answer The Lord Jesus Christ saith Mat. 28.19 20. Go ye therefore and teach all Nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Disciple all Nations but that must be first by Preaching and Instructing them in the Principles of the Christian Faith And addeth I cannot be of their mind who think that Persons may be baptized before taught Pool's Synopsis on Mat. 28. Baptizing them c. Never intending any should be baptized but what
for Men go down into the Sea So accordingly it was practised in the Apostles Time they went down into the Water which if it had not been to be dipp'd in it they need to have gone only unto it therefore how vain is that he asserts John baptized standing at the brink of the River Jordan pag. 8. This is to contradict the Word of God which saith plainly Philip and the Eunuch went both down into the Water not to the brink of it and came up out of the Water In pag. 4 5. his great Ordnance by which he thinks to do the most Execution is from 1 Cor. 10.1 2. where it is said All our Fathers were baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea Answer 1. Consider it is said the Fathers not the Children were baptized 2. If you will have it the Children also then you must include there Beasts and Cattel for the Cloud poured Water upon them all 3. Where-ever the word Baptism is used whether it be applied to the Spirit to Sufferings or to Water it always sheweth some large measure of all So here they were baptized in the Cloud and in the Sea not properly baptized for that Ordinance was not in use then but the scope of that place is the Apostle thought fit to borrow that word Baptize for to show God's gracious protection of them in the Red-Sea as in the Wilderness he fed them with Manna from Heaven and gave them Water out of a Rock So he left them not in the Red-Sea but encompassed them about in safety by his Divine Providence with Water on each side of them and the Cloud over them as Persons are encompassed with that Element when baptized Again for the true understanding of the Word we must have recourse to the common Acceptation of it and not imagine the Spirit of God doth contradict the common Acceptation of Words among Men. When the Prophets wrote by Inspiration and the Apostles they always used such words as were vulgar and commonly accepted amongst Men so that the common acceptation of the Hebrew word Tabal among the Hebrews and Baptizo among the Greeks always signifying to dip there being other words to signify sprinkle or pour How then can pouring Rain from the Cloud be called Baptism as John Wall would needs have it though he beg for it because it can never be proved see my Book pag. 16 17. And is he not full of audacity or boldness to tell the World in pag. 8. That there is not one word that any by John or Philip were dipped when the very word properly signifieth dipping Hence the Dutch call John the Dooper And our Translators might as well have rendred baptize dip in all the places where it is as to render Judas sopt dipp'd and Christ's Vesture dipp'd in Blood being all from the same Original Word And whereas he tells the World pag. 16 17. Though the Scripture say they baptized in Aenon because there was much Water He saith It would not be enough to dip half the Body in 1. I suppose he never was there to see it but speaks by an implicit Faith 2. Common sense directs us to believe there was need of much Water to the due performance of that Ordinance or else the Holy Spirit would not have mentioned it as commodious for that Work because much Water there a little Water will sprinkle hundreds but much Water is necessary unto the due performance of this Ordinance of Baptism because it must be so done as to figure out the Death Burial and Resurrection of Christ Now I would fain know how sprinkling or pouring Water upon the Face doth figure out Christ's Death Burial and Resurrection Rom. 6.1 2 4. In pag. 9. how disingenuously doth he deal with Coloss 2.12 We are buried with Christ in Baptism To follow their natural Fancy saith he the Person buried is wholly passive and must be taken in Arms laid upon the Water then Water cast upon him till covered as Earth is upon the Dead Answer This way of discourse is a kind of trifling with God's Word You are to know Similitudes do not run upon all four as we say but respect must alway be had to the chief intent and design of a Metaphor which in this Text is to hold forth the Death Burial and Resurrection of Christ for our Justification and also holds forth our Death to Sin and Resurrection to a new Life This being the prime scope of the Apostle his way of discourse is nothing but to evade the strength of the Argument Whereas in pag. 10. he saith The Person baptizeth part of himself because he goeth into the Water We answer That is false because he doth not lay himself down in the Water but that is done by the Administrator he lays him along as one buried under the Water his whole Body not the upper part only to figure out Christ's lying in the Grave for as the Persons stands upright in the Water that is not Baptism but when laid along under the Water by the Administrator using the words of Institution I baptize thee in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost this is Baptism In pag. 14. he saith The Person is not baptized but his Cloaths Those things are not becoming Modesty to discourse of Let that vain Man know we do not baptize the Cloaths in the Name of the Blessed Trinity but the Person and should we baptize otherwise I fear this poor Man would be the first would reproach the Interest of Christ upon that account Whereas he chargeth B. K. pag. 80. with the whole Assembly of Baptized Believers that they were forced to try their Wits for want of those literal words Remember you keep holy the First Day Answ Our Arguments for observing the First Day do greatly satisfy our Consciences being grounded upon the Word of God Also our Arguments against Pedobaptism and for Believers Baptism also being proved from the same Divine Revelation But alas how are Men put at their Wits end to find Arguments for Pedobaptism or else they would never prefer a dark Consequence before a plain Command which is beneath the Reason of a Man nor run to the Law to prove a Gospel-Ordinance and reject God's Institution and set up Man's Invention Could he say as much for Pedobaptism as we can for the Lord's Day the Controversy would not have held so long Could he give us such Examples of Infant-Baptism as we can for our religious observing that Day we shall give him thanks And whereas in pag. 104. he quarrels because we do not Baptize always upon the First Day We do not judg we are confin'd to that Day The Lord's Supper Christ himself did institute it and practise it with his Apostles on another Day than the First Day of the Week Although we do grant it is very commendable to do such Work on such Days when retired from our Labour yet we do not think we are confin'd to that Day for