Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n alive_a dead_a life_n 5,787 5 5.0987 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A38608 New observations upon the Creed, or, The first of the four parts of the doctrine of Christianity preached upon the catechism of the French churches : whereunto is annexed The use of the Lords prayer maintained / by John Despagne ... ; translated out of French into English.; Nouvelles observations sur le symbole de la foy. English Espagne, Jean d', 1591-1659.; C. M. D. M. 1647 (1647) Wing E3263; ESTC R13854 71,425 411

There are 7 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of God caused himself to be known by his miraculous actions divers notwithstanding took him for John the Baptist whom they imagined to be raised from the dead and to be the authour of those marvels that then were wrought Matth. 14.2 and 16.13 14. This errour had passed further if that Prophet had in effect been raised But it was requisite that that light should give place to a greater Luminary since he came not but onely to bring men unto Christ To conclude Christ is the onely Prophet that made any stay after his death to the end that he might be adored by them All the rest that returned from the dead either have been persons that had nothing extraordinary in their life or have not stayed alive some few moments of time upon the earth but Christ stayed fourty days and conversed with many at several times in several places and in several occurrences Of all those that have been raised from the dead none is introduced in Scripture speaking except Jesus Christ We need not demand whether we would be curious to see a man that had returned from the dead or whether we would desire to speak with him How many questions should we ask him We should demand of him what remembrance he had what being his soul had out of the body in what place it lodged in what condition it found it self what it saw or understood and what it did When Lazarus was raised great troops of the Jews ran to see him Without doubt they had as much curiosity as we have to ask and to hear him discourse And surely they whom God restored to life recovered also their speech yet the Scripture reporteth not any thing which hath been spoken by them And even when Eutychus was raised Acts 20.9 which happened in the presence of many spectatours he put himself again into the assembly to hear Saint Paul nor did they forsake the preaching of the Apostle to ask or hearken to one that was returned from the dead We read indeed that Moses and Elias being returned to the world spake with the Son of God in his Transfiguration and the subject of their discourse was of the decease which the Redeemer was to accomplish in Jerusalem Luke 9. But for the rest all the dead which have been raised keep silence in the History for it reciteth not any one word which they uttered although it observeth other particularities which seem lesse considerable And this is true of all those whose resurrection it hath described there being not one of them who is represented unto us speaking Hereupon it is to be considered why the Scripture never rehearseth what they have said For an omission so notable and universal cannot be without cause We finde therefore that this is an honour reserved to Christ to be the onely man among them that were raised from the dead whose words should be registred the onely one which speaketh in the Scripture the onely one from among the dead whom we can hear Wherefore the holy History expresseth very amply the words which the Son of God uttered after his Resurrection to divers persons upon divers subjects but for the rest which returned from the dead it mentioneth not so much as one word of all that they have spoken Three several Fourties of Days in the time that our Saviour stayed in this world Observations upon this circumstance Fourty days passed after the birth of Christ till the first entry he made into the Temple to be presented according to the Law Levit. 12. Luke 2.22 Fourty days after his Baptism till the day he began to enter upon the functions of his charge having miraculously fasted all that time And fourty days after his Resurrection before he entred into heaven In the first Fourty he appeared as a common man as all the rest of the first-born of Israel which they carried to the Temple to consecrate them to God In the second he appeared as a miraculous man as Moses and Elijah by an abstinence extraordinary In the third he appeared as the Son of God being declared to be so by his Resurrection Rom. 1.4 Many memorable periods have begun and ended by Fourties of days or yeers The Deluge began by a rain of Fourty days and Noah opened the window of the Ark Fourty days after the waters were withdrawn from covering the tops of the highest mountains The slavery of the Hebrews in Egypt and the peregrinations of their Fathers lasted ten times Fourty yeers Gen. 15.13 to wit till their going out of Egypt and were followed by another Fourty yeers of their sojourning in the desert Moreover after their going up out of Egypt to the yeer in which Solomon laid the foundations of the Temple which is a date of a great consideration in the sacred History there passed twelve times Fourty yeers 1 King 6.1 Why the Son of God entered no more into the Temple after his Resurrection And the difference in this regard between Him and those which were his principal types Hezekiah having been menaced with death had a promise that on the third day he should ascend into the house of God as a man newly raised from death Jonah being brought back to the light of the living would see the Temple of God chap. 2.5 And Isaac another figure of the Resurrection of Christ was delivered from death in the same place where the Temple was afterward built Now the Son of God being raised from the dead entered indeed into the City of Jerusalem and revisited divers places which he had frequented before his death but he returned no more into the Temple which at other times he had so often honoured with his presence For it was not convenient that this great and Eternal Priest having consummated the Sacrifice which disannulled all those of the Temple of which he had rent the vail and being to make his entrance into the Sanctuary of heaven should return into that which was none other then a figure of the heavenly Heb. 9.24 Of those which have seen the Son of God being in heaven We know that he hath been seen in all the three degrees of his Exaltation He was seen after his Resurrection by more then five hundred persons at one time He was seen ascending into heaven by the eleven principal disciples And finally he hath been seen at the right hand of God by Saint Steven and by Saint Paul These two witnesses sufficed for the publishing the third degree of his Exaltation the first and the second being attested by so great a number of persons It is a thing considerable that the Wisdom of God hath chosen the first of the Martyrs and the last of the Apostles to be eye-witnesses of the glory of his Son The one being in the hands of the executioners died in this confession That he saw the heavens open and Jesus standing at the right hand of God Acts 7.55 56. The other having been a sworn enemy of the Name of Christ and of those
or quality of an Altar in this Oblation Neither doth the Scripture ever call it so although it speaketh so often of the Crosse and of the Sacrifice of Christ Let it not displease so many learned men who have authorized this vulgar phrase That Christ was offered on the Altar of the Crosse The Crosse was not the Altar of this incomparable Sacrifice The name of Altar is of greater importance then many men consider This is an irrefragable Maxime That the Altar is greater then the Offering in as much as it is the Altar which sanctifieth the Offering Matth. 23.19 Whence would follow that which none should dare to think that the Crosse should be more excellent then the Body of Jesus Christ yea that it had sanctified it All that can be said when the name of Altar is given to the Crosse is this that it is not understood so in effect but onely by way of similitude or allusion But such a similitude transferreth to the Crosse a title which appertaineth to none but Christ for on the Crosse himself was the Altar the Sacrifice and the Priest altogether Under the Law these were different things because one of these figures alone could not represent Christ in all these three qualities but in him they are found united and no creature hath had part in this honour Why then should we communicate it to the wood of the Crosse Either this phrase hath helped toward the adoration of the Crosse or it hath proceeded from that Superstition or howsoever it be it hath been unwisely introduced without taking heed to the consequences which it draweth after it Why the Scripture speaketh of what matter the Crosse was made yet expresseth not the form of it It concerneth us to know that it was of wood This particularity should seem little considerable if the Apostle had not opened the mystery shewing that Christ hath delivered us from the curse insomuch as he was hanged on the tree because this kinde of death was cursed by the Law Deut. 20.23 Gal. 3.13 But for the structure of it of how many pieces it was composed how they were placed and in sum what figure it had this is that which the Scripture passeth under silence as not necessary The form which is commonly given to the Crosse is contradicted by the learned which represent it quite another We shall observe from hence that supposing we had the true figure of the Crosse and that it were an object of adoration as the Church of Rome teacheth this honour would not appertain to any but Crosses of wood for Jesus Christ was not crucified on a Crosse of stone or silver Neverthelesse they make Crosses of all things but this is to falsifie that of Christ under pretext to represent it None hath wrought Miracles at his death except the Son of God This is remarkable against the Jews Divers great servants of God have wrought Miracles in their life but never in their death Was there ever man at whose death appeared such wonders as at the death of Christ Whence cometh it that neither Moses nor Joshua nor Samuel nor Prophet nor King nor Patriarch hath wrought any Miracle dying And whence cometh it that this crucified having given up the Ghost rendeth the Veil of the Temple darkeneth the Sun cleaveth the Rocks shaketh the Earth and opened the Sepulchres The exploit of Samson dying howsoever prodigious yet it was not miraculous to speak properly nor doth it approach any thing neer to those great wonders which our Lord wrought in his death Wherefore is Jesus Christ the onely man among all men whose death hath been honoured with visible miracles if not to distinguish him from all other men by a mark so illustrious So as I have observed before as well the Birth as the death of Christ have been signalized by miracles and never any man whatsoever hath had the like honour Three signes from heaven exhibited in three several passages by the which Jesus Christ hath been declared publikely to be the Messiah In the course of the life of Jesus Christ in the days of his humiliation we consider his Nativity his Baptism and his Death His Nativity in which he began to appear in the world His Baptism by which he entered into the functions of his Office And his Death by which he finished the work of the Redemption Every one of these mystries was immediately followed and overtaken by a signe from Heaven and that way shewed unto the world His Birth by the Star which carried the news as far as the East preceded by the acclamation of Angels publishing this happie Nativity His Baptism by the opening of the Heavens and the descent of the holy Ghost in the shape of a dove accompanied by the voice of God His Death by the miraculous darkning of the Sun which filled all the earth with darknesse When the Jews demanded that Jesus Christ should authorize his calling by some signe from Heaven they should have learned that which passed at his Birth and his Baptism and afterward they ought to have considered that which happened at his death They had then seen his calling attested by three signes from Heaven Why the High Priest who represented Jesus Christ never came neer to the dead and yet Jesus Christ did the contrary The Law forbade the High Priest to touch a dead corps yea to enter into any house in which there was one deceased yea to shew any signe of grief were it for his own father or mother Levit. 21.10 11. Whence it appeareth that if he found himself in any place where any person was at the point of death it behoved him to depart from thence immediately his presence being incompatible with that of a dead body But on the contrary Jesus Christ entered into the house where lay the dead body of the daughter of Jairus Himself took her by the hand He touched the Coffin of the young man of Naim that was carrying to the grave He shed tears over Lazarus already putrified These particuiars are more important then they seem to be Certainly the defiling which the Law findeth in dead bodies might bear a reflexion upon the Priest because he was not capable of removing the corruption of death But he which is able to give life unto the dead is above this Law and the reach of this infection Here is seen a notable difference The Mosaical Priesthood abandoneth the dead and leaveth them in their uncle●nnesse because it cannot remedy it But the true and eternal Priest because he raiseth the dead hath conversed with them and his touch hath restored their life He cometh to search us yea within our graves yea he guardeth our bones Why the fear of death was more excusable in the Saints of the Old Testament then it is now And why we ought not to imitate them in all that which have spoken concerning this subject We should finde it strange that the apprehension of a natural death should make a Christian to
which were raised out of the dust Matth. 27.52 53. Afterward that of Tabitha Acts 9.40 And for the third example that of the young man Eutychus Act. 20.9 10 11 12. There are notable resemblances between the three that were raised under the Old Testament and the three which Jesus Christ raised before his death The first raised from the dead in the Old Testament was the onely son of a widow and the first raised ●n the New Testament was the onely son of a widow The one in Sarephta the other in Naim In both the Testaments God began the Resurrection of the dead by the demonstration of his Mercy as well as that of his Power Moreover the last of the three raised before the coming of Christ was already entered into the grave where he touched the bones of the Prophet Elisha and the last of the three raised by Christ to wit Lazarus had already stayed four days within the Sepulchre Why Christ rose not again the day after his death but suffered the whole Sabbath day to passe over before he returned to life I passe by the ordinary reasons which are brought concerning this and will onely observe a Maxime which I finde in this matter to wit That never any dead man was raised again on the Sabbath day The Son of God hath healed many sick on the Sabbath day but ye read not that on that day he raised any dead And in sum none of all those which were returned to life as well under the one as the other Testament and of whom we have considered the catalogue and the order according to which they are ranked hath been raised on the Sabbath day I shall verifie this when I shall come to expound the fourth Commandment of the Decalogue For the present question we may say that Jesus Christ who is the Head of the Resurrection would shew the communion which is between him and others that are raised in whom we have a preludium of the general Resurrection And forasmuch as none of them recovered life on the Sabbath day he also not to seem to disjoyn himself from them would not that his Resurrection should fall on that day This excludeth not the other reasons of the time of his stay among the dead A comparison of the time which God employed in the Creation with that which he employed in the Redemption And of the days of the one and the other The time of the Creation was six Days that of the Redemption was but of three Days which is the lesse by one half But the Wisdom of God hath divided the time of the Creation in two equal parts each of three days the first three being distinguished from the three following by a most evident mark The first three days of the world with their nights had neither Sun nor Moon nor Stars but preceded the being of all these lights in which they have been different from all other days that since have come As therefore the Creation hath had three days extraordinary so the Redemption in the which the world hath been as created anew hath had these three marvellous days in the which Christ continued among the dead It is to be observed that himself speaking of the three days of his stay within the bowels of the earth Matth. 12. which ought not to be understood of three entire days had regard to the history of the Creation which reckoneth the Evening and the Morning for a Day a part for the whole Gen. 1.5 8. The first and neerest cause of the three days detaining of Jonah in the whales belly The intention of God indeed was to present unto men in Jonah a type of the Resurrection of Christ as every one knoweth But there was first another reason for which the Prophet was not delivered before the third day The chastisement of the sinner oftentimes answereth to the fault even to circumstances This happened to Jonah His History telleth us that Nineveh was a City of three days journey chap. 3.3 For having refused to take this walk of three days in Nineveh he was condemned to keep prison three days within the whale The three days which he would not passe over in a great City among men it was necessary for him to passe in the intrails of a fish out of the sight of men and sun From this historical consideration we come to that of this great mystery which is enclosed in the detention and deliverance of Jonah The Resurrection of Christ figured in Hezekiah by a double resemblance It is sufficiently known that this Resurrection as touching the circumstance of the Third Day hath been prefigured in Isaac in Jonah in Hezekiah A Patriarch a Prophet a King have been the types Isaac destined to be offred an whole-burnt-offering and remaining as dead in the brest of his father is as returned to life on the third day Gen. 22. Heb. 11.19 And this for the more ample correspondence happened very neer the same place where Christ afterward was buried and where he rose from the dead Jonah issuing from the depth of the sea giveth the term of fourty days to the Ninevites And this figure which marketh out the Resurrection of Christ on the third day extendeth also all along the fourty days which Christ gave unto the world after his Resurrection before he left the earth The healing also of Hezekiah is considered as a type He was held in the rank of the dead and his bed was to him a grave He was raised up miraculously on the Third Day as it were surviving himself 2 Kings 20.5 But that which I observe concerning this last and which I adde to the observations of those which have gone before me is another correspondence which is found between the wonders that befell in this subject the one in the sicknesse of Hezekiah and the other in the death of Christ In both these there was a Miracle in the Sun For the Eclipse of this Luminary which happened at the death of Christ was supernatural as well as the going back in the sicknesse of Hezekiah So that this type meeteth with Christ dead and raised from the dead by a double resemblance But the shadow which returned ten degrees backward to foreshew the return of Hezekiah to the course of his life was not so miraculous as the return of Christ from among the dead verified by ten Appatitions by which as by so many degrees he shewed himself living again upon the earth before he ascended into heaven Why none ever was raised again the third day after his death but onely Christ Of all those whom God hath caused to return into the world after they were dead there is not one whom the Scripture saith to have been raised on the Third Day If there had been any one this circumstance had not been omitted in History All have been raised either before or after the Third Day after their decease but none on that day The son of the widow of Sarephta the daughter
of Jairus Eutychus were certainly raised again the very day of their death The son of the Shunamite he of Naim Tabitha and the man which was raised from death in the Sepulchre of Elisha most probably had not yet reached to their Third Day among the dead when they returned to life As on the contrary many others have been raised after their third day to wit Lazarus and the Saints that rose from the dust when Christ rose again This circumstance of the Third Day for the Resurrection hath been appropriated to Christ and marked out for him in the Calender of the Prophets to the end that among other signes which distinguish him from all others that were raised he might be known also by this as particular to him to wit that his Resurrection befell on the Third Day according to the Scriptures When Lazarus was dead our Lord let passe the Third Day before he raised him and stayed till the Fourth Joh. 11.39 Among divers reasons of this delay I reckon this The Son of God would not raise Lazarus the same day of his decease nor before he entered into the Sepulchre because he had already raised two dead which had not as yet been put into the earth to wit the young man of Naim and the daughter of Jairus which was deceased but a few hours before Now his intention was to extend his power yet farther to wit as far as within the grave as he did when from thence he fetched Lazarus But this dead man had not his Resurrection on the Third Day our Lord having deferred if till the Fourth and hindering the concurrence of it with his own in regard of this circumstance Three miraculous Sepulchres in the holy History The Scripture mentioneth three famous Sepulchres in the which God hath given life to the dead to wit That of Elisha whose corps served to raise another dead though himself returned not to life That of Lazarus which was raised from the dead but not by himself That of Christ who rose himself and at the same time raised many others whose graves he had opened at his own death Matth. 27.52 53. The two first were preparatories to the wonders of the third The Son of God raised others before he raised himself and again in coming out of the sepulchre he carried his power into the graves of others who were raised after him Four men that raised the dead before and after the coming of Christ The gift of Miracles was conferred upon divers who notwithstanding received not the power to restore life to the dead this kinde of Miracle being reserved to a small number of them The Scripture nameth but four who exercised this power two under the Old Testament and two in the New The two first are Elijah and his successour Elisha The one raised the son of the widow of Sarephta the other the son of the Shunamite The two other are Saint Peter and Saint Paul The one raised Dorcas the other Eutychus So God raised two instruments of the Resurrection before the coming of his Son and after he was gone out of the world Christ appeared between the two first and the two last as the Sun among the Planets spreading his quickning power over the dead of the one and the other Testament The continuation of the Article of the Resurrection of CHRIST His Ascension into Heaven His Sitting at the right hand of God Christ hath verified his Resurrection by all the proofs which could be given BEing come back from the dead he hath made himself known to be living Not to one person alone but to many men and women yea to above five hundred together Not at one onely time but at many and divers times Not for a little time but for the space of fourty days Not in one onely place but in many and divers in the city in the fields within the houses and upon the mountains Not afar off but in the same chamber in a close place Not by one means but by an infinite number of testimonies By the Hearing he causeth his voice to be known By Sight his lineaments and stature By the Touch the wounds of his hands his feet and his side By his Actions going coming and eating with his disciples he shewed that he was truely alive And beside all this by all the Scriptures beginning at Moses and going thorow all the Prophets he proved the necessity and verity of his Resurrection Why God never raised any person of note to converse among men except the Messiah Of all the dead which have returned into the world to sojourn there some space of time and frequent the company of men there hath not been except our Lord any Prophet nor any person otherwise famous Those whom God raised either were children as he of Sarephta and the son of the Shunamite or young people as he of Naim the daughter of Jairus and Eutychus or without any mark of eminent quality in the Church as he that came living out of the grave of Elisha Lazarus and Tabitha For as for the Saints which appeared on the day of the Resurrection of Christ they did no more then passe by and having shewed themselves stayed not at all among mortals neither are their names mentioned in the History Whereupon it may be asked Why being raised from the dead they stayed no longer time in the world that there might have been some time to converse with them And in sum Why none of the Patriarchs or of the Prophets have been called back from the dead to sojourn a while among men as Lazarus or Eutychus But without speaking of the Fathers of the Old Testament I will yet make this question Why did not our Lord raise John the Baptist who had been his forerunner and his contemporary in the days of his flesh Was it not to the purpose that that excellent Prophet so great a light of the Church and who had suffered death for the Truth should be returned unto life as well as the daughter of Jairus or the young man of Naim It is easie to conjecture why this was not done If Abraham or David or any one of the Prophets or any one of them who wrought Miracles in their life time had returned to the world there to make their abode there had never wanted those who would have honoured them excessively If Superstition made Idols of the dead bodies of Saints how much more would it have ido●ized the very bodies themselves living after their death This is one of the causes for which God liked better to raise an ordinary man who had touched the bones of Elisha then to raise Elisha himself For such a Prophet that had been so famous in Miracles had been adored by men if he had returned from the grave to be among them There was also another particular reason concerning John the Paptist It is known how high his reputation had been After his death that was ascribed unto him which was not For when the Son
of his graces hath appeared in the distribution of his judgements For they whom his mercy first visited have been the first that have been visited by his justice and in succession others according to the date of the time of their enlightning Of many kindes of scourges equally dreadful and unavoidable which ought to be chosen if God should leave the choice to us or which is more to be desired I speak not of those three scourges of which God gave the choice to David to wit Plague War and Famine The question is cleared 2 Sam. 24. But there are an infinite number of other scourges general and particular where oft-times we are constrained to chuse the one that we may escape the other or at least we desire the one rather then the other it concerneth us that our desire be lawful We set aside that which dependeth not at all on our choice or of which there can be no dispute but in vain as which is worse to be born deaf or to be born blinde Or which is more grievous Leprosie or perpetual Infamy But for example A man guilty of a capital offence who is permitted to chuse the kinde and fashion of his punishment or a dangerous labour of a woman where the life of the mother cannot be saved with that of the childe and many other occurrences or different afflictions that encounter one another in the front and reduce us to a necessity of chusing one I conceive that it behoveth to chuse that in which God is lesse offended The choice of David was judicious preferring the Pestilence before the other two scourges not onely for the reason by him expressed but also because in War and Famine there are committed more sins and more enormous then in a Pestilence War ordinarily is a torrent of villanies and Famine produceth unnatural horrours so far as to induce a mother to eat her own childe Now concerning other kindes of adversities in which it is requisite that we make a choice we ought to look well upon every one with their circumstances to take notice of that which affordeth the least occasion ●o offend God Whence cometh it that among publike scourges those that passe the hand of men are more frequent more universal and of longer durance then those which come immediately from God For one Famine that you read in Histories you shall finde ten Wars and Famine also it self for the most part cometh from a preceding War Now War proceedeth immediately from man Neither Famine nor Pestilence have ever been so universal nor of so long continuance as divers Wars The Providence of God would make men know that they procure to themselves more mischief then heaven hath sent upon them It maketh for the glory of God that there be more wicked then good men I am not here to shew why it is necessary that there should be wicked men God who hath made nothing in vain hath made all things for himself even the wicked for the day of evil Prov. 16.4 Neither am I to declare how it is necessary that God should suffer them If his Justice should extirpate all the wicked the greater part of the earth would become a desert and in stead of being peopled with men would be peopled with savage beasts and this would redound to the prejudice of them that are good who from thence would receive a thousand discommodities This was the reason why God would not destroy all at one blowe the inhabitants of Canaan for fear left the Countrey should fall to be a wildernesse and should be replenished with cruel beasts which would have given more trouble to the Israelites Exod. 23. But how can it serve to the glory of God that the number of the wicked should surpasse the nūber of the good On the contrary doth it not seem that the glory of God would be more illustrious and of a greater extent if the good were in greater number then the wicked If it were so the subsistence of humane society and the policy by which it is maintained would seem rather to depend upon the goodnesse of men then upon the Providence of God But this is a wonder that there being far more wicked men then good neverthelesse there is a Providence which hindereth the wicked from doing all the evil that they might do For whence cometh it that being in a far greater number they do not altogether ruine the good Certainly it is the work of God who maintaineth a handful of men in the midst of a world of wicked The greatest good that God hath done to the world is come to passe by means of the greatest crime that men could commit The greatest sin that men ever committed was to crucifie the Prince of glory It was impossible to perpetrate one more enormous Yet neverthelesse from this crime managed by the wisdom of God hath been brought forth the greatest good which men have received from heaven to wit the benefit of Redemption This is wonderful that God hath taken the advantage of the greatest sin that the world could commit to cause to issue from it the greatest good that the world could receive Nature it self hath restrained the forces and ability of man to the end to bound his desires and the effects of his malice All the cares of man cannot adde one cubit to his stature If this could be brought to passe we should see prodigious bodies every one striving to attain to an unmeasured height The same Providence which hath limited the stature of man hath denied him that which it hath granted to the birds to wit the liberty of going to and fro in the air He seeth those creatures passing swiftly thorow that element over his head while he cannot lift himself above the earth This is to the end that he may not extend his violence so far nor so easily nor so generally For howsoever violence traverseth the sea and climbeth up to the top of the highest mountains it would yet be more formidable and more pernicious if it had the wings of an Eagle and innocence which often findeth refuge in places inaccessible would have no more a sanctuary in the world Of the marvellous Providence of God permitting that the righteous die by the hand of the wicked The first righteous man of the Old Testament to wit Abel and the first righteous of the New to wit John the Baptist were both thrust out of the world by the hand of wicked men God would that the first-fruits of the just in both Testaments should fall down under the hand of wicked men Furthermore the last man that is named in Scripture is a just man to wit Antipas Apol. 2. And this just man was put to death by the wicked So that the first and the last of the righteous lost their lives by the fury of those that were perverse The Scripture beginneth the catalogue of good men in their blood and endeth it in their blood The beginning and the closure teach
nameth the number of young people raised from the dead is greater then that of aged persons of whom we have none but Tobitha and it may be him that was raised in the grave of Elisha Now this also is a short table or patern of the great Resurrection which is to be at the last Day For that shall raise far more young people then old This needeth no demonstration The number of them that die young hath still surpassed the number of them that die old How many human creatures die in their childhood or in their growth or in the flower of their age Those that go beyond all those first seasons of their life and arrive as far as the last are very few in comparison of them whom death intercepteth in the way As therefore the number of the younger sort is the greater among the dead so also it shall be the greater in the Resurrection of the dead And to represent this to us God would by a mysterious Preludium raise more of young people then of old Of the first Resurrection and of the second death mentioned Revel 20. And from whence those terms are extracted THis passage hath divers difficulties For it speaketh of a term of a thousand yeers during which the Saints must raign with Christ It is also said that the rest of the dead are not to rise till those thousand yeers be accomplished and this is the first Resurrection Concerning which the Expositours both ancient and modern have very different opinions And many renewing the opinion of the Millenaries figure to themselves a bodily Resurrection of the faithful which they believe must precede by many ages the Resurrection of other men Now I will not contradict the common exposition which beareth that by the first Resurrection is meant the Regeneration by which we rise again into newnesse of life And by the second Death that which is otherwise called eternal But that which I have to observe here is that these terms the first Resurrection the second death carry with them an excellent allusion which is not considered though it be very visible and that it giveth abundance of light in the obscurity of this text This therefore is to be noted that according to the literal construction of these words there are two Resurrections The one which is or already hath been performed in this world the other which is to be at the last day The one is particular the other is universal Now this is true historically and really For Lazarus Eutychus Tabitha and divers others mentioned in Scripture have been already raised once this is the first Resurrection and shall yet be raised once more to wit in the end of the world with the rest of the dead So that they have two Resurrections having already passed thorow the first This allusion is extended yet farther It is said touching them that have part in this first Resurrection that the second death hath no power over them Upon which it is to be considered that it is never said that Lazarus or any of all them which were raised from the dead died the second time It is very true that they died again for Christ is the first of them that rose to immortality Neverthelesse the Scripture which is so exact to set down all that which is worthy of consideration never relateth the second death of them which have been raised no not of one of them It did import as it should seem to know so much the consequents and the effects of the divine power which restored them to life that we should know whether they lived any long time after they were raised from the dead Yet their second death is not read in the Scripture A silence so constant and universal as well in the one as the other Testament is not without some great ground I think therefore that this omission is mysterious as divers others which are seen in the Scripture There is no doubt but that Melchizedek died as well as other men Yet as every one knoweth he is said to be without end of life Heb. 7.3 That is to say in as much as he is presented as such in the holy History the which reciteth not either the birth or the decease of this person but rather produceth him as a man eternal Accordingly howsoever those that have been raised have been returned to the grave yet this is not expressed The Scripture after having raised them leaveth them as living for ever without ever saying that they died afterward So that their second death is not found Where therefore it is spoken Revel 20. of those which have part in the first Resurrection that the second death hath no power over them it is evident that this expression is drawn from the history of them whom we read to have been raised from the dead which is the first Resurrection but we read not that they died the second time Thus the Spirit of God draweth matters Historical to frame the images of future events which it setteth to view in Prophecies This Book of the Revelation is all composed of such pictures whereof the stuff and colours are borrowed of that which hath come to passe really according to the letter but animated with a spiritual and mystical sense For it doth not follow that that which is literally in History ought to be understood literally in Prophecie On the contrary it representeth one thing by another quite different though there be a resemblance of one to the other These Prophetick terms that the second death hath no power over them which have a part in the first Resurrection expresse formally the history of Lazarus and the rest which already have had one Resurrection which we read not to have been followed by a second death Shall we therefore yet expect that some shall be raised before the last Day yea a thousand yeers before By the same reason it will be requisite that we expect two men which shall have power to shut up heaven to hinder that it rain not to turn waters into blood to smite the earth with all plagues to consume their enemies with fire coming forth of their mouth Revel 11.5 6. But this if we take it literally is as absurd as if we would make Moses and Elias to come again for this Prophecie is moulded upon their history By the same reason we must imagine Jaspers Amethysts Emeralds in the heavenly Jerusalem Rev. 21. where the magnificence of it is represented under the figure of those precious stones which were set in the brestplate of the High-Priest Exod. 28. And by the same reason we must rebuild the Altar and Temple of Jerusalem which represent the Christian Church Revel 11. Everlasting life The first and the last of all Miracles THe first Miracle that came to passe after the Creation is as I have already said the translation of Enoch And the last Miracle which shall be wrought in the world shall be the translation of the faithful which
man ever wrought Miracle within the Temple of God except the Son of God An observation upon this subject p. 89. Why Jesus Christ when he was hungry or thirsty or weary with travel never helped himself by his miraculous power to give himself refreshment p. 91. Why the Son of God after he was raised from the dead ceased from healing the sick p. 92. Of the Tears of Christ in the days of his Flesh p. 93. Christ condemned by Pilate AConsideration why the names of dive●● wicked men are set down in the hist●● of the Passion of Christ p. 9● The name of the Romane Empire hath is tervened both in the birth and death of Christ p. 97. The Death and Burial of CHRIST FOur glorious occurrences distant many ages one from the other and coming ●● passe on the like day p. 98. An advertisement touching the Name of Altar improperly ascribed to the Crosse p. 100. Why the Scripture speaketh of what matter the Crosse was made yet expresseth not the form of it p. 102. None hath wrought Miracles at his death except the Son of God p. 103. Three signes from heaven exhibited in three several passages by the which Jesus Christ hath been declared publikely to be the Messiah p. 104. Why the High Priest who represented Jesus Christ n●ver came neer to the dead and yet Jesus Christ did the contrary p. 106. Why the fear of death was more excusable in the Saints of the Old Testament then it is now And why we ought not to imitate them in all that which they have spoken concerning this subject p. 108. The descent of CHRIST into Hell AN observation upon the words of the Apostle Rom. 10.6 7. forbidding to ask who shall ascend into heaven or who shall descend into the abysse p. 110. Why Christ being on the Crosse pronounced the first words of the 22 Psalm p. 112. The fruits of the death of CHRIST VVHy the Son of God deferred so long time to come and expiate the sins of the world p. 114. An admirable concurrence of the time of Redemption with the times of the most famous Ceremonies of the Law An observation upon this subject p. 118. A mysterious reason of the name which the Apostle giveth to the Sacrifice of Christ calling it A Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour Ephes 5.2 p. 120. The Resurrection of CHRIST NIne examples of the Resurrection of the dead which have gone before or followed the Resurrection of Christ An Harmony between those that were raised under the Old Testament and those that were raised by the Son of God while himself was yet mortal p. 123. Why Christ rose not again the day after his death but suffered the whole Sabbath day to passe over before he returned to life p. 125. A comparison of the time which God employed in the Creation with that which he employed in the Redemption And of the days of the one and the other p. 127. The first and neerest cause of the three days detaining of Jonah in the whales belly p. 128. The Resurrection of Christ figured in Hezekiah by a double resemblance p. 129. Why none ever was raised again the third day after his death but onely Christ p. 131. Three miraculous Sepulchres in the holy History p. 134. Four men that raised the dead before and after the coming of Christ p. 135. The continuation of the Article of the Resurrection of CHRIST His Ascension into Heaven His Sitting at the right hand of God CHrist hath verified his Resurrection by all the proofs which could be given p. 136. Why God never raised any person of note to converse among men except the Messiah p. 137. Of all those that have been raised from the dead none is introduced in Scripture speaking except Jesus Christ p. 141. Three several Fourties of Days in the time that our Saviour stayed in this world Observations upon this circumstance p. 143. Why the Son of God entered no more into the Temple after his Resurrection And the difference in this regard between Him and those which were his principal types p. 145. Of those which have seen the Son of God being in heaven p. 146. All the miraculous prerogatives which have been severally in divers Saints are found united in one onely Christ in a soveraign degree p. 148. Of the last Judgement VVHy doth the holy History never say that God descended but onely where the businesse hath been to do justice or to establish it and protect the innocent p. 150. An observation upon the four general Judgements mentioned in the Scriptures p. 151. A wonderful Mystery which is seen in the several goings out of the three first men which God took out of the world p. 153. Why God who hath foretold and set down the measures of certain particular times hath not revealed how long the world should endure or when the day of Judgement should be p. 156. Of the holy Ghost FOur remarkable productions which the Scripture attributeth to the Spirit of God to wit two in the Creation two in the Redemption p. 159. Why the Scripture representeth the holy Ghost and his effects under the names of Water of Fire of Anointing with Oil and of Sprinkling of Blood The true interpretation of these terms contained in divers passages p. 160. A catalogue of those actions which were celebrated with Aspersion of Blood in the time of the Law p. 163. Blood hath no propriety of making white Why then is it said Apocal. 7.14 that the Saints have made white their robes in the blood of the Lamb p. 166. Of the Church and the Communion of Saints WHy Moses is more prolix and more exact in the description of the Tabernacle then in that of the whole world p. 169. The number of persons that make up the body of the universal Church is not onely prefixed and definite but also regulated by measures and proportions p. 171. Of the small number of believers in the three several comings of the Son of God Resemblances on this subject p. 174. Three several states of the Church in three several times and three several titles of it p. 175. A difference between the Church of the Old Testament and that of the New in regard of the Communion of those things which were ordained to sanctity p. 176. Four several buildings of which God hath been the Architect representing severally the estate of the Church p. 178. Why the most notable periods of the Church and many famous mysteries had their beginning in a Desert p. 180. All the Church was never gathered together in one place except then when it was in the Ark. p. 182. The Remission of Sins A Difference between the Remission which the Law presented of old to sinners and that which is offered unto them by the Gospel p. 184. Which is most injurious and repugnant to God Either Despair or Presumption p. 187. A believer having commited some sin very enormous is it credible although he have repented and obtained pardon that God will love him altogether as much as he loved him before the offence committed Ibid. Examples of divers great sinners reestablished in their first estate p. 190. The Resurrection of the Flesh WHy is Abraham so highly commended for having believed that God could raise the dead Heb. 11.19 p. 192. An admirable gradation in those which have heen raised from the dead p. 193. Why there have been more young people raised from the dead then old p. 195. Of the first Resurrection and of the second death mentioned Revel 20. And from whence those terms are extracted p. 197. Everlasting life THe first and the last of all Miracles p. 203. Why Adam was not carried bodily to heaven as well as Enoch p. 204. Why God hath shewed the glory of heaven to some that were yet upon the earth and yet never shewed hell to any person while he was in this world p. 206. Why Saint Paul being come back from the third heaven speaketh not of having Seen but onely of having Heard 2 Cor. 14.4 p. 207. Of Faith The Conclusion of this Treatise TWo onely things at which Jesus Christ as man wondered p. 208. Of a strange method by which God obligeth men to Believe p. 209. Of those that promise to Believe if the truth be shewn unto them p. 110. FINIS