Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	adam_n	sin_n	wage_n	4,026	5	11.2119	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A35959	Truths victory over error, or, An abridgement of the chief controversies in religion which since the apostles days to this time, have been, and are in agitation, between those of the Orthodox faith, and all adversaries whatsoever, a list of whose names are set down after the epistle to the reader : wherein, by going through all the chapters of The confession of faith, one by one, and propounding out of them, by way of question, all the controverted assertions, and answering by yes, or no, there is a clear confirmation of the truth, and an evident confutation of what tenets and opinions, are maintain'd by the adversaries : a treatise, most useful for all persons, who desire to be instructed in the true Protestant religion, who would shun in these last days, and perillous times, the infection of errors and heresies, and all dangerous tenets and opinions, contrary to the word of God.	Dickson, David, 1583?-1663.; Sinclair, George, d. 1696.	1684 (1684)	Wing D1412; ESTC R3405	145,943	378

And besides this Law a positive Law was superadded to it that Adam should not eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that by obeying the same he might give a Specimen or proof of his obedience to the Law of Nature in the perfect obedience whereof so long as he should continue he should live for ever For the Lord threatned death to him only if he should sin and death is the wages of sin which by sin entered into the world Gen. 2. 17. Rom. 6. 23. Rom. 5. 12. 13. 4 From those places of Scripture in which it is denyed that believers under the Covenant of Grace are justified by the Law but by Faith and the righteousness of Christ manifested in the Gospel For that the Law is weak powerless or impotent through the corruption of our Nature to justifie us and give us life Rom. 3. 20 21 28. Gal. 2. 16. Gal. 3. 10 11 12 13. Phil. 3. 9. Rom. 8. 2 3. Quest. II. DO the first four Commandments contain our duty towards GOD and the other six our duty towards man Yes Matth. 22. 37 38 39 40. Well then do not the Papists and Lutherians err who maintain that three only belong to the First Table and seven to the Second and that thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image with the foregoing thou shalt not have any other Gods before me are but one Command And that Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house thou shalt not covet thy neighbours Wife nor his man-servant c. are two distinct Commands Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the two first Precepts command diverse things The one teacheth us who is to be worshipped to wit the true and living God and no other The second instructs us how he is to be worshipped namely according to his own appointment and not according to the appointment and pleasure of men as by Images and such like 2 Because it is one and the same Concupiscence which is forbidden in the tenth Command the summ whereof Thou shalt not covet is cited by the Apostle Paul Rom. 7. 7. and which is summarly exprest in the close of the tenth Command nor any thing which is thy neighbours 3 If the tenth Command ought to be two because these words thou shalt not covet are twice repeated then would it follow there should be as many Commands as there are things desired forbidden because it is evident that these words Thou shalt not covet are to be repeated with every part Quest. III. ARE all the Ceremonial Laws now abrogated under the new Testament Yes Col. 2. 14 16 17. Dan. 9. 27. Eph. 2 15 16. Well then do not the Judaisers err who maintain that all the Ceremonial Laws remain in their former strength and vigour and are obliging to Believers under the Gospel and not abrogated or disanulled by Christ Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ hath abolished the Law of Commandments contained in ordinances that he might gather together both Iews and Gentiles into one new man Eph. 2. 14 15. Col. 2. 14. Note that the Apostle here speaks of all Believers both of Iews and Gentiles as of one man because they being all under Christ the Head as members of one spiritual Body are made up as one renewed man 2 Because the Apostle sayes let no man judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy day or of the new Moon or of the sabbath dayes all which are shaddows of things to come but the body is of Christ Col. 2. 16 17. This ver is a conclusion of the Apostles foregoing discourse against Ceremonies and things commanded by the Ceremonial Law which by the coming of Christ are abolished He calls them in the 17 verse a shaddow of things to come but the body says he is of Christ. That is the thing signified is of Christ for all the shaddows of the Old Testament had respect to Christ and his benefites by whose coming they also have an end Iohn 1. 17. Gal. 4. 3 4 5. 3 Because the Apostle says Believers are dead with Christ from the Rudiments of the World that is from the Ceremonial Commands as is evident from the Context Why says he as though living in the World are ye subject to ordinances That is as if your life and happiness consisted in these outward worldly principles but suffer your selves to be burdened by such Teachers with humane institutions and ordinances The Apostle indeed in these last words is reasoning against the institutions and ordinances of men from this Medium which is an argument from the greater to the lesser if ye be dead with Christ from the Ceremonies of the Law instituted in the Old Testament by God himself much more are ye free from the institutions and ordinances of men which are only grounded upon their own good pleasure Col. 2. 20 21. Gal. 4. 10 11. 4 Because the Apostle affirms that the Observation and useing of Circumcision cannot consist with true Faith in Christ now after the Gospel is fully published And he exhorts the Galatians to abide in their liberty purchased by Christ and not to submit themselves to the yoke of Mosaical Ceremonies Gal. 5. 1 2. 5 Because those Teachers who pressed the believing Gentiles to be circumcised and to observe the Law of Moses I mean the Ceremonial Law were condemned by the Council of Apostles Acts 15. 24. 6 Because Ceremonial Commands are neither of the Law of Nature nor are they injoyned to Believers under the Gospel as things Moral 7 Because these appointed Ceremonies were figures only of things to come imposed on the Iewes until the time of Reformation but taken away by Christ Heb. 9. 9 10 11 12. and Heb. 10. 9. Where it is said he taketh away the first namely all sorts of Propitiatory Offerings which were used in the Old Testament to settle the second namely his obedience to the will of his Father 8 Because they were given to the Israelites to foresignifie and represent Christ and his death and to be marks of difference between them and the unbelieving Nations Col. 2. 17. Eph. 2. 14. Where it is said who hath made both these namly Iewes and Gentiles one and hath broken down the middle wall of partition whereby the Ceremonial Law is understood which made a difference between the Iewes and the Gentiles Now since Christ hath suffered death and the Gentiles are called all these Ceremonies which did foresignifie his death and made that difference must of necessity cease 9 Because the Temple of Ierusalem to which the Ceremonies were restricted is destroyed and could never since be rebuilded Quest. IV. DId the Lord by Moses give to the Jews as a Body Politick sundry Iudicial Laws which expired together with their state Yes Do they oblige any other now further than the general equity thereof may require No. Exod. 21. from the first to the last ver Exod. 22. 1. to verse 29. Gen. 49.

Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Scripture says GOD blinds their eyes and hardens their hearts even actively and judicially Iohn 12. 40. Exod. 7. 3. Deut. 2. 30. Rom. 9. 18. 2. Because God is said to punish one sin with another Rom. 1. 24 26 28 1 Thes. 2. 11 12. 3 From the practise of Iob and David who when they were afflicted and persecuted looked to God and took it patiently Iob 1. 21. Quest. III. DOth the sinfulness of the action proceed only from the Creature and not from God I answer from the Creature only Iam. 1. 13. 14 17. 1 Iohn 2. 16. Psalm 50. 21. Well then do not the Libertines err who affirm God without blasphemy be it spoken to be the Author and Cause of all sin Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From Davids testimony Psalm 5. 4. 2 From Moses his testimony Deut. 32. 4. 3 From Daniels testimony Dan. 9. 14 4 From the testimony of Iames 1. 13. 5 From the testimony of Iohn 1 Iohn 2. 16. and 1 Iohn 1. 5. 6 From the testimony of Paul Rom. 3. 3 4 5. 7 From the testimony of Habukkuk 1 13 From reason 1 because God is in the highest degree essentially and infinitely Holy and Good and therefore pure and free from every spot and blemish Isaiah 6 3. Psalm 78 41 1 Peter 1 15 16 Lev. 11 44 2 Because God is absolutely perfect and therefore he cannot fail or be deficient in working 3 Because God is the Judge of the World He is the Forbidder the Hater and Revenger of all sin and unrighteousness as contrary to his holy Nature and Law Exod chap 20 Rom 3 5 6 Gen 18 25 Rom 1 17 Psalm 5 4 4 Because by his own most absolute and most supream dominion Soveraignty and infinite perfection He is in and of himself above all Law whatsoever and under the command of none in Heaven or in Earth CHAP VI Concerning the Fall of Man of Sin and the punishment thereof Question I. IS the guilt of the sin of our first Parents imputed and the same death in sin and corrupted Nature conveyed to all their Posterity descending from them by ordinary generation Yes Rom. 5 12 15 16 17 18 19 1 Cor. 15. 21 22 45 49. Psalm 51. 5. Gen. 5. 3. Iob 14. 4. Iob 15. 14. Well then do not the Pelagians and late Anabaptists Quakers and Socinians err who deny original sin inherent Yes Do not likewise the Dominicans Franciscans and Iesuits err who maintain the Virgin Mary not to be conceived in Original sin Yes Does not lastly a certain Ring-leader of the Quakers err who maintains that to Infants this Original sin is not imputed until by actual sin they joyn themselves to it Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From that well known place of Scripture Rom. 5. chap. which is the very seat and foundation of this Doctrine of Original sin 2 Because unless a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God Iohn 3. 3. 3 Because all men by Nature and birth are the children of wrath Eph. 2. 3. 4 Because whatever is born of the flesh is fleshly Iohn 3. 6. And who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean Not one Iob 14. 4. Iob 15. 14. 5 Because all the thoughts and imaginations of the heart of man viz. of the natural and unregenerate man are evil continually Gen 6. 5. 6 Because David confesseth that he was shapen in iniquity and in sin did his mother conceive him Psalm 51. 5. 7 Because Infants that are guilty of no actual transgression need a remedy against sin to wit absolution by the blood of Christ a Seal whereof was given according to Gods institution under the Law to Infants namely Circumcision to which Baptism under the Gospel succeeds Deut. 30. 6. Rom. 2. 29. Acts 22. 16. Mark 1. 4. Col 2. 12. Gen 17. 12. Matth. 28. 19. 8 Because all the Elect among which are infants Matth. 18. 6. Mark 9. 42 are redeemed by Christ and are set at liberty from slavery freed from the fault and penal punishment Iohn 1. 29. Iohn 10. 15. 1 Tim 2. 6. 9 Because infants are lyable to death and other miseries and calamities which are the wages and punishments of sin Rom 6. 23. Gen 3. 19. Quest. II. IS this corruption of Nature albeit pardoned and mortified through Christ in some measure in the Regenerate both it self and all the motions thereof truely and properly sin Yes Rom. 7. 5 7 8 25. Gal. 5. 17. Well then do not the Papists Socinians and Arminians err who maintain that Concupiscence or Lust and the first motions thereof which have not gotten the consent of the Will are not properly and truely sin Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because they are forbidden by the Moral and Natural Law in the tenth Command Exod. 20. 17. Deut. 5. 21. Rom 7. 7. 2 Because Paul speaking of himself while unregenerate calleth concupiscence and lust of which the controversie is often times sin and evil Rom. 7 5 6. 3 Because it is a great part of the old Man which we must lay down and must be mortified Col 3. 5 6 9. Ephes 4. 22. Quest. III. DOth every sin both Original and Actual being a transgression of the Righteous Law of God and contrary thereunto bring in its own nature guilt upon the sinner whereby he is bound over to the wrath of God and the curse of the Law and made subject to death with all miseries Spiritual Temporal and Eternal Yes 1 Ioh. 3. 4. Rom 2. 15. Rom. 3. 9 19. Eph 2. 3. Gal 3. 10. Rom 6. 23. Ephes 4. 18. Rom 8. 20. Lam 3. 39. Matth 25. 41. and 2 Thes 1. 9. Well then do not many of the Papists err who maintain That all sins are not contrary to the Law of GOD nor transgressions thereof Yes Do not all Papists err Who deny every sin to be mortal or to deserve Eternal punishment Yes Lastly Do not the Socinians err Who deny that any sin can deserve Eternal punishment Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because all sins deserve Eternal death Rom 6. 23. Esek 18. 4. Rom 8. 6 13. 2 Because every sin is a transgression of the law 1 Iohn 3. 4. 3 Whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point he is guilty of all Iames 2. 10. 11. and therefore he deserves Eternal punishment 4 Because those sins of Infirmity and Ignorance which the Saints are subject to and which the Papists call Venial sins will not suffer them to stand in Judgement before GOD nor can the Saints be justified from them but by Faith and therefore in strick Justice they merit and deserve Hell Psalm 143 2. Psalm 130 3 4 8. 5 Because GOD commanded Believers under the Law to offer typical Sacrifices for making a propitiation for such sins and Christ did really by his own pretious blood purge them away for by no less price

or oblige him to give any thing as due And according to the order of Gods justice he can receive no favor from us nor can any creature confer any benefit on him Ps. 16. 2. Iob 22. 2 3. Truely where there is no favour done there can be no Merit for merit presupposeth a benefit accepted 4 Because our works are imperfect as well as to Parts as to Degrees Gal. 5. 17 Is. 64. 7. Deut. 27. 26. A Perfection of parts is when we have a Part of every Grace and are renewed in some measure in every power and faculty of the whole man though we be not come to the just and due measure in any of them A perfection of Degrees consists in the compleat measure of our conformity and our exact correspondence to the Law of God in respect of all whatsoever it requires 5 Because Christ says so likewise ye when ye shal have done all those things which are commanded you say we are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our duty to do Luke 17. 10. 6 Because the Good Works which we do are not ours but it is God that worketh in us both to will and to do 1 Cor. 4. 7. Gal. 5. 22. Phil. 2. 13. 7 Because that heavenly blessedness to be given to the saints is expresly attributed to the mercy and pity of God Plalm 103. 4. Matth. 5. 7. Titus 3. 5. Eph. 4. 6 7 8. 8 Because when the Apostle proclaims death to be the wages of sin he doth not affirm life eternal to be the reward of Good Works but the free and gracious gift of God which we obtain by Christ even in our sanctification whereof the Apostle here Rom. 6. 23. Which free Gift hath for its end eternal life Not that it merits this for then it should not be a gracious gift but because Christ hath merited this for us and shal of free Grace give it to us as the following words through Iesus Christ our Lord shew 9 Because God will have us to buy without money or price Wine Milk Honey that is to receive all things requisite and necessary for our spiritual life for Nothing and eternal life it self Isaiah 55. 1 2 3. 10 Because Christ should not be a perfect Saviour if any thing from us were to be added to the righteousness of his Merit But Christ is a perfect Saviour Eph. 1. 7. Eph. 2. 7 8 9. 1 Iohn 1. 7. Acts 4. 12. 11 Because our best works have such a mixture of corruption and sin in them that they deserve his curse and wrath so far are they from meriting Isa. 64. 6. But we are all saith the Prophet as an unclean thing and all our righteousnesses are like filthy raggs 12 If the works of regenerated men did deserve eternal life then should the whole contrivance of the Gospel be subverted and the same very way of Life layed down which was in the Covenant of works as is clear from 2 Cor. 5. 21. The Gospel is so contrived by the infinite Wisdom and Goodness of God that there is a judicial transferring of our sin as a debt on Christ the Cautioner and a translation of his righteousness and merit to be imputed to us for our justification without the least respect to our works Quest. VII ARE Works done by unregenerate men although for the matter of them they may be things which God commands and of good use both to themselves and others are they I say sinful and cannot please God Yes Hag. 2. 14. Titus 1. 15. Amos 5. 21. 22. Hos. 1. 4. Rom. 9. 16. Titus 3. 5. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain that not only all the works of unregenerate men are not sinful but also that some of their Works do indeed Merit and deserve somewhat from God namely as they speak by Merit of Congruity that is as they are agreeable to the Law of God Yes There is also as they say a Merit of Condignity by which the works of the Regenerate which follow justification deserve eternal life not from the imputation of Christs righteousness but from their own intrinseck worth and proportionableness to the Reward Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because as a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit neither can a corrupt rotten tree bring forth good fruit Matth. 7. 18. 2 Because all unregenerate men are dead in Trespasses and sin Eph. 2. 1. 3 Because all the works of unregenerate men are done without Faith and so cannot please God Heb. 11. 6. Rom. 14. 23. 4 Because if unregenerate men were able to do Good Works or perform any duty which deserved somewhat from God than would it follow that a man were able to do some good of himself which is contrary to Iohn 15. 5. Phil. 2. 13. 5 Because it is clear from Scripture that before renewing grace all are the children of wrath who of themselves cannot have a good thought nor any active concurrence or putting themselves forth to the utmost for their own Conversion 2 Cor. 3. 5. Therefore no plea for merit by any improvement of mens natural abilities see Rom. 9. 15. CHAP. XVII Of the Perseverance of the SAINTS Question I. CAN they whom GOD hath accepted in his beloved effectually called and sanctified by his Spirit either totally or finally fall away from the state of Grace No. Shall they certainly persevere therein to the end and be eternally saved Yes Phil. 1. 6. 2 Pet. 1. 10. Iohn 10. 28 29. 1 Iohn 3 9. 1 Peter 1. 5. 9. Well then do not the Papists Socinians Arminians and some Ring-leaders among the Quakers err who maintain that the Saints may totally and finally fall away Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Saints are built upon the Rock and not upon the Sand therefore when temptations of any kind assault they can never fall nor can the gates of hell prevail against them Matth. 7. 24. Matth. 16. 16 18. 2 Because he that hath begun a good work in the Saints will finish it untill the day of Jesus Christ Phil. 1. 6. 3 Because Paul says nothing can separate us from the love of God Rom. 8. 35 38 39. 4 Because they that fall away have never had true justifying Faith Luke 8. 13 16. 1 Iohn 2. 19. 5 Because it is impossible for the Elect to be seduced Matth. 24. 24. I say impossible not in respect of the will and power of the Elect themselves but in respect of the immutability of Gods Decree concerning them and of his purpose of keeping them powerfully against seduction according to his promises of which he cannot repent see Iohn 10. 28. Rom. 8. 38 39. 1 Peter 1. 5. 6 Because they that believe in the Son of God have life eternal 1 Iohn 5. 13. Iohn 6. 47 54 58. And they have passed from death unto life and shall never thirst nor hunger any more Iohn 6. 35. 7 Because God hath promised in his Covenant that though he chastise his own

substance Yes Iohn 1. 1 14. 1 Iohn 5. 20. Heb. 2. 14 16 17. Luke 1. 27 31 35. Well then do not those Hereticks called Marcionits and the Anabaptists err who maintain That Christ is not a true Man but onely the Appearance Shape or Form of a Man Yes Do not likewise the Manicheans err who maintain That the Body of Christ is not of the substance of the Virgin Mary but a heavenly Body brought from Heaven to the Womb of the Virgin Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ is said to be made of a Woman Gal. 4. 4. 2 Because the Word was made Flesh Iohn 1. 4. 3 By an induction of the essential parts of a Man and sinless infirmities which were found in him First He was endued with a rational Soul Iohn 12. 27. Secondly He had a real and substantial Body and denyed he was a Spirit only Luke 24. 39. Thirdly Christ did hunger Mat. 4. 2. Fourthly He was wearied and thirsty Iohn 4. 6. Lastly He was sad he groaned in Spirit and was troubled Iohn 11. 33. and verse 15. He wept None of which sinless perturbations can agree to an Appearance Shape or Form of a Man 4 Because He was made of the seed of David according to the Flesh Rom. 1. 3. and descended of the Iews Rom. 9. 5. 5 Because the promises were made in the seed of Abraham Gen. 12. 3. and Gen. 18. 18. 6 Because He took not on him the nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren Heb. 2. 16 17. 7 Because otherwise he could not have satisfied in our place the Justice of GOD seing it had been unjust for another Nature to have suffered punishment than that Nature which had offended and sinned Quest. II. ARE there two whole perfect and distinct Natures in Christ the God-head and the Man-hood inseparably joyned together in one person Yes 1 Cor. 8. 6. Eph. 4. 5. Well then do not the Nestorians err who maintain the Union between the Divine and Humane Nature not to be Hypostatical but only by way of Assistence and that as there are two Natures in Christ so there are two Persons one proper to the Divine Nature another proper to the Humane Nature Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because unless Christ-God-Man were but one Person the Merit of his Death would not be of so great value as to redeem the Elect from infinite and eternal punishment seeing hence cometh all the value and worth of his death that the same Person who was God did suffer and die for us 2 Because otherwise Christ had been swallowed up and devoured by the wrath of God against the sins of the Elect which he himself undertook 3 Because Christ if he had not been both God and Man in one Person he could not have been a Mediator for a Mediator must be One 1 Tim. 2. 5. Quest. III. IS the Godhead and Man-hood in Christ united without Conversion Composition or Confusion Yes Luke 1. 35. Col. 2. 9. Rom. 9. 5. 1 Peter 3. 18. 1 Tim. 3. 16. Well then do not those old Hereticks the Eutichians err who maintain that as the Person of Christ is One so his Nature is made One by a composition or Confusion of the two Natures together Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because such a Composition is impossible seing the Divine Nature is most perfect and cannot lose any of its own perfection unless we would affirm the Divine Nature to be mutable and changeable 2 Because that same Christ who according to the Flesh descended of the Iews is over all God blessed for ever Rom. 9. 5. 3 Because this doctrine takes away all means of Mediation for by taking away the distinction between the Natures they take away the Natures themselves and so neither could Christ have suffered in our place because not Man neither could he have given any vertue value or worth to his sufferings because not God Quest. IV. DID Christ endure most grievous torments immediately in his soul Yes Mat. 26. 37 38. Luke 22. 44. Matth. 27. 46. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain that the soul of Christ even from its first creation was never affected with any sadness or sinless perturbation of mind Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Scripture testifies that his soul was sad unto death Matth. 26. 37. 2 Because the Apostle Iohn testifies that when Christ saw Mary weeping for her brother Lazarus he groaned in Spirit and was troubled Iohn 11. 33. Iohn 12. 27. 3 Because his soul was exceeding sorrowful even unto death as was cited before Matth. 26. 37. 4 The same thing is proven from Christs desertion whereby the actual fruition and enjoying of Gods favour as to his sense was interrupted and broken in the midst for a time but in no wise altogether taken away which made him cry upon the Cross My God my God why hast thou forsaken Me. Matth. 27. 46. Eph. 5. 2. Quest. V. HAD the Lord Iesus by his perfect obedience and sacrifice of himself which he through the eternal Spirit once offered up unto God fully satisfied the Iustice of his Father Yes Rom. 5. 9. Rom. 3. 25 26. Heb. 9. 14 16. Heb. 10. 14. Well then do not some otherwise Orthodox err who deny Christs Active Obedience to be a part of his satisfaction performed in our place Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Active disobedience of the first Adam made us all sinners therefore we must be made Righteous by the Active Obedience of the second Adam Rom. 5. 19. 2 Because Christ not only offered himself to the death for us but for their sakes that is for the Elects sake he sanctified himself that is he gave up himself as a holy sacrifice Iohn 17. 19. 3 Because it behoved Christ to fulfil all righteousness Mat. 3. 15. 4 Because we stood in need not only of the expiation of sin for saving us from eternal death but of the gift of righteousness for obtaining eternal life according to that precept and demand of the Law Do this and thou shalt live And therefore Christ is not only called our Ransom but the end and perfection of the Law to every one that believeth Rom. 10. 4. That is the aim of giving the Law by Moses is that thereby men being brought to the knowledge of their sin should flie for refuge unto Christ and his righteousness as he that hath perfectly fulfilled the Law for us 5 Because the passive obedience of Christ was not in it self meerly and purely passive but his active obedience did challenge the chief and principal part in it Psal. 40. 7. Then said I lo I come in the volume of the book it is written of Me. With these words our Saviour Christ declareth his willing Obedience to accept of undergo and execute the Mediatorship by GOD imposed

Iohn 4. 2. 4 Because reason requires that from the knowledge of the effect we should come to the knowledge of the cause according to that of Matth. 7. 16. 5 Because marks of Grace have so much clearness in themselves that they will even beget in others a judgement according to charity concerning the Election of others therefore much more in those same very Persons who are able to discern and know better their own hearts 1 Thes. 1. 3 4. Quest. IV. DOTH this infallible assurance belong to the essence of Faith No. May a true Believer wait long and conflict with many difficulties before he be partaker of it Yes 1 Iohn 5. 13. Isai. 50. 10. Mark 9. 24. Psalm 88 throughout Psalm 77 to the 12. verse Well then do not the Antinomians err who maintain That the assurance of Salvation is Faith it self And that Faith is nothing els but the Eho of the Soul answering the holy Spirit my sins are forgiven me Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the sealing of the Holy Spirit which is the Earnest of our inheritance is given to Believers after they have believed Eph. 1. 13 14. 2 Because Believers may sometimes not know that they have eternal life 1 Iohn 5. 13. And he that feareth the Lord obeying the voice of his servant may walk in darkness Isaiah 50. 10. 3 Because if this assurance which takes away all doubting as the Antinomians affirm were of the Essence of faith there should not be any degrees of faith which is contrary to Mark 9. 24. Matth. 8. 10. Matth. 15. 28. 4 Because there are evident examples in Scripture from the Experience of the Saints as that of faithful Heman who thus complained Psalm 88. Why casteth thou off my soul why hidest thou thy face from me And of faithful Asaph under very sad exercise Psalm 77. to the 10 verse Quest. V. DOTH this assurance of Salvation incline men to loosness No. 1 Iohn 2. 1 2. Rom 8 1 12 1 Iohn 3 2 3 1 Iohn 1 6 7 Rom 6 1 2 Titus 2 11 12 14 2 Cor 7 1 Well then do not the Papists err who maintain That the Doctrine of Assurance of Salvation is of its own nature hurtful to true Piety and inclines men to sin and wickedness Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Apostle Peter argues the contrary way and infers a far other conclusion namely because Believers know they are redeemed by the pretious blood of Christ they ought to pass the time of their sojourning here in fear 1 Peter 1. 17 18 19. 2 Because the Apostle Paul who was certainly perswaded of his interest in Christ rejects and abominats that conclusion with indignation and wrath Rom. 6. 1 2. 3 Because from the promise that God is the Father of Believers the Apostle exhorts the Corinthians by consequence to cleanse themselves from all filthiness of the flesh and Spirit and to perfect holiness in the fear of God 2 Cor. 7. 1. 4 Because they who are in Christ to whom there is no condemnation and are assured of it walk not after the Flesh but after the Spirit Rom. 8. 1. 12 38 39. 5 Because a Believer knowing God to be merciful concludes that God ought to be feared Psalm 130. 4. 6 Because whosoever hath that hope namely that he shall see Christ and be made like unto him he purifies himself as he is pure 1 Iohn 3. 3. 7 Because it is evident from the example of those who were perswaded of their salvation who yet lived piously and holily As Paul Rom. 8. 38 39. compared with 2 Cor. 1. 12. Acts 24. 16. Next we have the example of Abraham Gen. 17. 1. compared with Rom. 4. 18 19 20. Quest VI ARE true Believers when they fall into some special sin which woundeth the Conscience and grieveth the Spirit destitute of the seed of GOD and life of Faith No. 2 Iohn 3 9 Luke 22 32 Well then do not the Quakers and others err who maintain That true Believers falling into some special sin can have nothing of the life of faith and seed of GOD in them Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin for his seed remaineth in him and he cannot sin because he is born of God 1 Iohn 3. 9. For his seed remaineth in him that is doth not totally perish but abideth thenceforeward working the fruits of regeneration once begun in them Phil. 1. 6. 2 Because although Peter fell into that grievous sin of denying his Master thrice yet he still retained that seed of God and life of Faith and love to Christ because Christ had said to him I have prayed for thee that thy Faith fail not Luke 22. 32. The like may be said of David and others of the Saints of GOD who by falling into some special sins have wounded the Conscience and grieved the holy Spirit CHAP. XIX Of the Law of GOD. Question I. DID GOD give to Adam a Law as a Covenant of Works by which he bound him and all his Posterity to Personal Entire Exact and Perpetual obedience Yes Did he promise life upon the fulfilling and did he threatten death upon the breach of it Yes Was Adam endued with Power and Ability to keep it Yes Gen 1 26 27 Gen 2 17 Rom 2 14 15 Rom 5 12 19 Gal 3 10 12 Eccl 7 29 Iob 28 28 Well then do not the Socinians err who maintain that God made no Covenant with Adam in his integrity in which he promised to him and his posterity life eternal Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From those places of Scripture where the righteousness of the Law is described Lev. 18. 5. Rom. 10. 5. Gal. 3. 12. Ezek. 20. 11. 13. Whosoever therefore keepeth my Statutes and Judgements saith the Lord shall live in them And to whom life is promised for ever upon their perfect obedience and continuance in all things written in the Book of the Law And from those places in which death is threatned to them that in the least transgress the Law of God Deut. 27. 26. Gal. 3. 10. Ezek. 18. 4. 2 From the words of our Saviour who spoke to the Young man according to the Covenant of Works in which the Lord promiseth life eternal to such as shall fulfil the Law Matth. 19. 17. Luke 10. 28. Observe that Christ answereth here according to the question and opinion of this young man who thought he was able to obtain salvation by his own good works and therefore Christ directs him to the Law thereby to bring him to the acknowledgement of his own imperfection and afterwards to Faith in himself 3 Because man was created by God in righteousness holiness and immortality according to the similitude and image of God Gen. 1. 26. Gen. 9. 6. Eccl. 7. 29. Eph. 4. 24. Col. 3. 9 10. And received from him the Law of Nature naturally ingraven upon his heart Rom. 2. 14. 15.