Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	adam_n	sin_n	transgression_n	6,929	5	10.8054	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A15415	Hexapla in Danielem: that is, A six-fold commentarie vpon the most diuine prophesie of Daniel wherein according to the method propounded in Hexapla vpon Genesis and Exodus, sixe things are obserued in euery chapter. 1. The argument and method. 2. The diuers readings. 3. The questions discussed. 4. Doctrines noted. 5. Controversies handled. 6. Morall observations applyed. Wherein many obscure visions, and diuine prophesies are opened, and difficult questions handled with great breuitie, perspicuitie, and varietie ... and the best interpreters both old and new are therein abridged. Diuided into two bookes ... By Andrevv Willet Professour of Diuinitie. The first booke.	Willet, Andrew, 1562-1621.	1610 (1610)	STC 25689; ESTC S118243	838,278	539

nor needed any such remedie therefore the lawe was not giuen vnto him 2. The law was not giuen to him to keepe who is the ende of the law but Christ is the ende of the law as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 10. 4. and the law is a schoolemaster to bring vs vnto Christ Gal. 3. 19. 3. Christ is aboue the law and Lord of the law euen as man therefore not vnder the law or subiect vnto it the first is euident where Christ saith the Sonne of man is Lord of the Sabbath which is a part of the law and as he is Lord of part of the law so of the whole 8. Obiect The Apostle saith Heb. 10. 19. By the blood of Iesus we may be bold to enter into the holy place S. Iohn saith 1. epist. 1. 7. The blood of Iesus doth purge vs from all sinne what neede then the imputation of the innocencie and obedience of Christ Ans. 1. Though the blood of Christ onely be named yet by a synecdoche part beeing taken for the whole other parts of his oblation are signified as his obedience and innocencie whereby his blood was made a sacrifice of atonement acceptable vnto God for God was not simply delighted with the shedding of Christs blood but with his obedience as Bernard well saith non mors sed voluntas placuit spont● morientis not the death but the will of Christ dying of his owne accord was pleasing vnto God 2. If all were in deede ascribed to Christs blood then the oblation of his flesh and bodie the anguish and agonie of his soule had beene superfluous by the blood then the other parts are signified but the blood is named as the most conspicuous part of his oblation and because it answered to the type the blood of the legal sacrifices 3. And though the blood of Christ doe purge vs from all sinne yet not from that b●nd and obligation whereby we are tied to keepe the law which we are freed from by the imputation of the obedience of Christ. 4. So then the expresse mention of the blood of Christ doth not exclude his innocencie and obedience but onely the blood of the legal sacrifices and mans merit and all other humane meanes which auaile not to saluation 9. Obiect But seeing Adams disobedience by the which sinne entred was but one offence in eating the forbidden fruit one act likewise of Christs obedience which was in the sacrifice of his death may seeme to be sufficient for our iustification Ans. Though God gaue but one precept vnto Ada● for these reasons 1. because one commandement sufficed to exercise and make triall of mans obedience 2. And the transgression of one commandement was enough to make man guiltie of eternall death 3. And thereby mans impotencie and weaknes appeared who in the state of integritie was not able to keepe that one commandement yet in that one precept were contained and included all the precepts afterwards giuen in the morall law as Tertullian saith primordialis illa lex quasi matrix omnium praeceptorum Dei that first law was the mother and wombe as it were of all Gods precepts And as Augustine well noteth in illo vno peccato intelligi possunt plura peccata in that one sinne many sinnes may be vnderstood c. quia superbia est illic c. for there was pride in that man loued rather to be in his owne power then Gods there was sacriledge because man beleeued not God and homicide because he cast himselfe headlong into death there was spirituall fornication because the integritie of mans minde was corrupted by the enticement of the serpent and there was theft because he vsurped the forbidden fruit and couetousnes in that he desired more then sufficed Wherefore seeing that in Adams transgression we are made guiltie of many sinnes we haue neede also of Christs whole righteousnes 10. Obiect If all Christs innocencie is imputed vnto vs for our righteousnes then all Christs acts must be imputed vnto vs likewise for our iustification Ans. 1. It followeth not that because all Christs acts which concerned the iustice and fulfilling of the law are imputed vnto vs for righteousnes that therefore all his acts are imputed for his descension conception incarnation his miracles are not imputed vnto vs because they were no part of the fulfilling of the law So then it is true that all the righteousnes which is imputed vnto vs Christ wrought for vs and that whatsoeuer Christ did he wrought for vs he was conceiued borne circumcised fasted for vs yet all Christs acts are not applied vnto vs for our iustification but onely those wherein properly consisted Christs obedience and the fulfilling of the law And thus much shal suffice of this question abridged out of Polanus 26. Quest. Whether the iustice brought in by Christ exceede the iustice of Adam The righteousnes of Christ imputed vnto vs by faith is farre more excellent many waies then the iustice which Adam had in the state of his innocencie 1. That was the iustice of a meere man but this is the iustice of that person which is both God and man 2. for the effects the iustice of Christ is meritorious of eternall life it ouercame death subdued the deuill none of all which Adams righteousnes could doe 3. Christs iustice is eternall and immutable but Adams iustice was but temporarie for a time 4. And we are in Christ restored to a more excellent state then we lost in Adam which was but terrene and mutable but by Christ we receiue an heauenly euerlasting and immutable kingdome 27. Quest. Whether it standeth with Gods iustice to iustifie vs by an others righteousnes and how that may be 1. It is not agreeable with Gods iustice to iustifie a sinner by that righteousnes which is not intended vnto him nor wrought for him but seeing Christ wrought not righteousnes for himselfe but intended it wholly vnto vs and our benefit it very well standeth with Gods iustice that we should be iustified thereby 2. And this iustice of Christ which is externall and without vs is more auaileable to saue and iustifie vs then if it were in our selues for then it were subiect to change and alter as all other gifts in vs are mutable and changeable but now this sauing righteousnes is in a subiect namely Christ immutable and vnchangeable 3. And this righteousnes is verily made ours by faith it is not an imiginarie or supposed iustification but verily and in deede for as we verily are by nature guiltie of Adams transgression so is the obedience of Christ verely made ours by imputation through faith And as our sinnes were imputed to Christ and he verely suffered death the punishment of sinne so we by the imputation of his righteousnes are verely made partakers of euerlasting saluation 28. Quest. How the vision and prophesie was to be sealed vp The Latine interpreter readeth vt impleatur c. that the prophesie and vision may be fulfilled which is

the guilt vnto condemnation and in making expiation for the fault and offence it selfe Quest. 23. v. 24. How the Messiah brought euerlasting righteousnesse 1. Some by this euerlasting iustice vnderstand Christ himselfe Vatab. who is said to be our iustice fiue wayes 1. exemplariter because his iustice and righteousnesse is set before vs to imitate and follow 2. satisfactorie because he hath satisfied the wrath of God by his righteousnesse for our sinnes 3. meritorie he hath by his righteousnes merited for vs eternall life 4. efficienter he is the efficient cause of our iustice and righteousnes 5. finaliter because this is the ende of our holinesse and righteousnesse to be made like and conformable to the image of the sonne as the Apostle speaketh Rom. 8. 29. Perer. But here is vnderstood not that righteousnesse which Christ hath in himselfe but that which is communicated vnto vs for here are two benefits rehearsed which should come by the Messiah the first is the taking away of sinne which is before expressed the other the bringing and giuing of righteousnesse 2. Some by iustice vnderstand the preaching of righteousnesse by the gospel as Lyranus as it is taken Isay. 45. 23. the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousnesse Pintus But the preaching of the gospell shall not be euerlasting for in the next world there shall be no neede of preaching the Saints shall enioy the presence and sight of the lambe who shall be their light 3. Some by iustice interpret the actiue iustice which God exercised vpon the crosse in not sparing his sonne but giuing him for the redemption of the world Hug. Card. But the verie phrase to bring in euerlasting righteousnesse sheweth that such a iustice is here meant not which was shewed vpon Christ but was communnicated to his members 4. Wherefore by iustice here is vnderstood nothing els but our iustification whereby the iustice of Christ is imputed vnto vs freely and made ours by faith Bulling and in this sense is the word iustice or righteousnesse taken Iames. 2. 23. Abraham beleeued God and it was imputed to him for iustice or righteousnesse Pintus 5. But we must take heede here of that Popish conceit of inherent iustice as Pererius here vnderstandeth that iustice quae in homine inest à Deo effecta which is in ●●an wrought by God c. for this iustice which is wrought in man by faith is nothing else but our sanctification which is imperfect and therefore it is not that euerlasting iustice which is the iustice of Christ imputed vnto vs by faith Quest. 24. Why it is called euerlasting righteousnesse 1. The iustice or righteousnesse of faith in Christ is called euerlasting in respect of the iustice of the lawe non euanescet sicut iustitia legis it shall not vanish away as the iustice of the law Osiand which was a temporarie iustice consisting in the obseruation of legall rites and ceremonies which were not to continue Perer. such was the righteousnesse of Zacharie and Elizabeth which are called iust because they walked in all the commandements and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 constitutions and ordinances of the lawe Luk. 1. 6. so also the gloss it is called eternall iustice quae legis iustitiam vincat which should exceede the iustice of the lawe 2. This iustice of faith is euerlasting because it is omnium temporum for all times all that euer liued in the world were iustified by the iustice of faith in Christ Bulling 3. And is eternall quia inchoatur in via in patria perficitur it is begunne here as in the way and shall be perfited in our countrey Pintus 4. But it is rather so called in respect of the euerlasting force and vertue of this iustice which shall neuer be extinguished but shall make vs accepted of God for euer Polan as the Prophet Isay saith c. 45. 17. Israel shall be saned in the Lord with an euerlasting saluation ye shall not be ashawed nor confounded world without ende Here followe certaine questions of the iustice of Christ in what manner wherein and in what measure it is applyed Quest. 25. Whether as Christs satisfaction for the punishment of sinne is imputed to vs by faith so likewise his innocencie It must of necessitie followe if that Christ hath obtayned and purchased for vs a perfect and absolute redemption that he hath discharged our whole debt not onely in satisfying for the punishment of the lawe but in imputing also vnto vs his innocencie and obedience as may appeare by these reasons 1. Christ is of greater power to communicate vnto vs his innocencie then Adam was to deriue vnto vs the guilt of his sinne and disobedience then as by Adam sinne was propagated and death came in by sinne Rom. 5. 12. so it is necessarie that we should receiue from Christ not onely exemption from death by his death but be cloathed also with his righteousnesse 2. We cannot stand in iudgement before God vnlesse we be endued with perfect iustice now perfect iustice is that whereby the commandements of God are exactly fulfilled which was performed not onely by that one act of Christs death but by the perfect innocencie and holinesse of his whole life therefore the whole obedience of Christ must be imputed and communicated vnto vs. 3. Christ discharged our whole debt Now we are debters not onely in respect of the punishment of the lawe which by our disobedience we haue deserued but the lawe exacteth also of vs perfect obedience and integritie from sinne in both these respects then we haue neede of Christ. 4. The Apostle saith directly Rom. 10. 4. that Christ is the ende of the lawe for righteousnesse vnto euerie one that beleeueth that is by faith the righteousnes of Christ in fulfilling the lawe is imputed vnto vs in as full and ample manner as if we had fulfilled the lawe our selues 5. If Christ hath not fulfilled the lawe for vs it would followe that the law remaineth still to be fulfilled by vs which is impossible The contrarie obiections answered Obiect 1. The righteousnesse of faith and the righteousnesse and fulfilling of the lawe are two diuerse things the righteousnesse which we receiue by Christ is by faith therefore not the fulf●●●ng of the lawe Answ. The righteousnes of the lawe by works and of the gospel by faith are not two diuerse righteousnes for they differ neither in matter as both requiring that obedience which is to be performed vnto God not in forme for the lawe of God is the rule of righteousnes in both they differ in the efficient and worker the legal righteousnes must be performed by man himselfe the Euangelical by Christ in our name and in the ende for the ende of the legal righteousnes is the glorie of man if he could keepe it by his owne strength the ende of the Euangelical iustice is the glorie of God in the setting forth of his mercie So then one and the same righteousnes is both of

the law in respect of Christ who fulfilled the law and it is not of the law in respect of vs because we fulfill not the law but of faith because we beleeue in him who hath fulfilled the law for vs. 2. Obiect If the obedience of the life of Christ be imputed vnto vs it seemeth then there was no cause why Christ should die for vs seeing we are made iust by his obedience Ans. 1. As by Adam both sinne entred and death by sinne so it was requisite that in both we should in the one be healed in the other helped by our blessed Medi●●our so Iustin Martyr per conuersationem exactam evacuans lapsum per mortem indebitam debitam extinguens by his most exact conuersation he auoided mans fall and by his vndue death abolished our due death c. 2. seeing the perfect fulfilling of the law consisteth in the perfect loue of God and of man it was necessarie that Christ should die for therein he shewed his perfect loue vnto God his father in beeing obedient vnto him Ioh. 14. 31. It is that the world may know that I loue the Father as likewise his perfect loue of man as our Sauiour saith Ioh. 15. 13. Greater loue then this hath no man when any man bestoweth his life for his friends 3. Obiect The law bindeth either vnto obedience of the law or to the punishment not vnto both if then Christs obedience be imputed vnto vs the imputation of his satisfaction by his death would seeme to be superfluous Ans. 1. That proposition is not simply true that the law bindeth either vnto obedience of the law or to the punishment for the law doth not properly binde vnto punishment but that is added as a commination the rather to mooue vnto obedience of the commandement as when the Lord saide to Adam that in the day he did eate of the forbidden fruit he should die the death that commination was no part of the bond or obligation of the commandement but a conditionail commination if the other were not performed 2. We must distinguish betweene the state of mans integritie and his fall while man stood in his integritie he was onely bound vnto the obedience of the commandement but since his fall man both is subiect to the obedience of the law which is not giuen him in vaine and to the punishment because he can not fulfill the law 3. Againe of the reprobate and wicked God exacteth onely the punishment due vnto their disobedience but of his elect he requireth both the obedience of the law and the penaltie both which are performed in Christ he hath fulfilled for them the one and suffered the other ex Polan 4. Obiect If Christ hath fulfilled the law for vs and we are by his obedience made righteous then it would follow that no other obedience or holines of life should be required of vs. Ans. It followeth not Indeede that perfect and absolute obedience of Christ whereby he perfectly fulfilled the law is not exacted of vs for Christs obedience is ours by faith yet an imperfect obedience is required as a testimonie of our faith and signe of our thankfulnes vnto God Like as it followeth not because Christ died for vs the death of the bodie that therefore it is not necessarie that we should die the death of the bodie still remaineth euen in the children of God for it is appointed for men to die once Hebr. 9. 27. but death is neither now as a punishment or as a satisfaction for sinne but as a condition of their mortall nature and a passage vnto a better life After the same manner obedience is now required of the members of Christ but neither such an obedience as Christs was that is perfect absolute nor to the same ende to be meritorious or satisfactorie for sinne 5. Obiect How are we made iust by the obedience of Christ seeing that we in Christs death are together punished with him Ans. 1. We 〈◊〉 not actually made iust by Christs obedience but by the imputation thereof we are iustified and held as iust in the sight of God 2. It is not all one to say we are punished in Christ and Christ was punished for vs and in our stead this is warranted by the Scriptu●e as the Prophet saith Isa. 53. 6. God hath laid vpon him the sinne of vs all But the other can not be affirmed 〈◊〉 seeing in Christs death we haue remission of our sinnes we can not be said for the same sinnes to be punished in and with Christ whereof we haue remission in his death 6. Obiect Seeing Christ died to that ende that we should be iustified by his death as the Apostle saith 2. Cor. 5. 21. He made him sinne for vs that knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnes of God in him how then is our righteousnes obtained by the obedience of his life Ans. 1. The obedience of Christ in his life and death can not be seuered for in perfect obedience is required constancie and perseuerance vnto the ende therefore the obedience of Christ in his death and suffering is a part of his integritie innocencie and righteousnes 2. Neither doth that place prooue that our righteousnes was purchased onely by Christs death but to make that a perfect and acceptable sacrifice the integritie of his life is required for in that he knew no sinne in himselfe but our sinnes were imputed vnto him as his righteousnes is vnto vs therein he was the vnspotted lambe and so was made for vs the sacrifice of atonement We see then that euen to make the sacrifice of his death acceptable the obedience and integritie of his life was requisite 7. Obiect How is Christs obedience made ours seeing he as a creature was subiect to the law and so was obedient thereunto for himselfe Ans. 1. It followeth not that because Christ as man was a creature that therefore he was for himselfe subiect to the law this is true of those which are creatures for themselues but Christ was not made a creature for himselfe he was not incarnate and made man for himselfe but for vs therefore not for himselfe but for vs was he subiect to the law 2. And further that Christ was not for himselfe bound and subiect to the law it may appeare by these arguments 1. to them onely the law was giuen whome the ends of the law concerne which are these before the fall of man the Law was giuen to these two ends to teach man the will of God and to containe and keepe him in obedience to the will of God After mans fall the law likewise hath two ends to teach man to know himselfe and to acknowledge his sinnes and to stirre him vp to seeke the remedie against the same But none of all these endes doe appertaine vnto Christ he needed not to be taught the will of God nor yet to haue any helpe to containe him in his obedience he had no sinnes to acknowledge

to the course of the Sunne otherwise by this reason the 70. yeares of the captiuitie must likewise be cutt short see before quest 17. 2. in great numbers sometime odde yeaes are omitted but so it is not here because these seuentie weekes are said to be cut our that is precisely they shall fall out to be so many weekes of yeares 3. That distinction hath no place here for seeing the account is made by weekes if any part thereof should be reckoned inclusiuely or exclusiuely it must be done by weekes of yeares not by single yeares as M. Liuely well obserueth pag. 187. 2. It remaineth then that these yeares must take their ende precisely at the time of the death and passion of Christ as Iulius Africanus Beda Ruperius Bullinger H. Br. doe determine them and then whereas it is said in the middes or halfe weeke the sacrifice shall cease the sense is that Christ by the sacrifice of himselfe in the latter halfe of the weeke shall abolish all other sacrifices in right and whereas it is said he shall confirme the couenant in one weeke the meaning is not that all the last weeke this couenant should be in confirming but the couenant shall be confirmed first by the preaching and then by the death of Christ in the last weeke which was done in the last middle or halfe part thereof Bulling Now for this precise determining of these weekes in the verie passion of the Messiah the reasons are these 1. The last weeke endeth at the confirmation of the couenant or Testament as the Prophet saith he shall confirme the couenant with many in one weeke the weeke then must end with that confirmation for not the beginning but the ende is counted for the weeke But the Testament was ratified by the death of Christ Hebr. 9. 17. the Testament is confirmed when men be dead therefore this last weeke endeth in Christs death Bulling 2. The death of Christ was to fall out in a yeare of Iubile that the bodie may answer vnto the figure therefore it is called the acceptable yeare of the Lord Isay. 6102. the great yeare of remission of sinnes and of the redemption of prisoners and captiues And so the yeare wherein Christ died was a Iubile yeare beeing the 28. Iubile by iust computation from the 8. yeare of Iosuah when the first Iubile was kept for so many Iubilies fall but in 1400. yeares It is most probable then that Daniels 70. weekes should ende with the last Iubile H. Br. in 9. Daniel 3. M. Liuely though he ende not the 70. weekes in the passion of the Messiah yet he holdeth so many weekes preeisely gathering so much by the Hobrewe phrase Sexentie weekes is cut out where a verbe of the singular number beeing put to a word of the plurall sheweth that euerie one of the weekes particularly from the first to the last shall be precisely and absolutely complete Persian Mon. pag. 159. 4. If any of these weekes should be extended beyond Christs death it is more like they should reach to the destruction and desolation of the di●ie which is by name expressed for there is no other cause to extend them further the preaching of the Gospell continued longer then three yeare and a halfe after Christ therefore in that regard the halfe weeke is not to be extended beyond Christs death 5. Burgens alleadgeth this reason to shewe that the last ende of these weekes must concurre with the passion of Christ nam deletie iniquitatis consummatio praevaricationis c. the taking away of iniquitie and the finishing of transgression which are propounded by the Angel in his first speach are the proper effects of Christs passion c. vpon this reason Burgens is so confident that he concludeth the ende then of these weekes est nobis notus de fide is knowne vnto vs as of faith that is certainely Thus then the argument may be framed the finishing of iniquitie and taking away of sinne were accomplished in the passion of Christ but seuentie weekes are determined for the finishing of iniquitie therefore 70. weekes are determined at the passion of Christ. 6. Mel●ncthon addeth further that the 70. weekes must not extend beyond Christs passion because the Iewes reiecting of him were no longer his people neither tooke he protection of them Thus hauing the beginning of these 70. weekes at Cyrus and the ende at the passion of Christ it remaineth then to be shewed how by a iust computation these 70. weekes may be brought from Cyrus vnto Christ. Quest. 50. Of the iust and exact computation of yeares from Cyrus first vnto the passion of Christ. 1. Tertullian beginning in the first of Darius counteth but 490. yeares to the destruction of Ierusalem the 62. weekes and an halfe he would haue ended at Christs natiuitie which make 437. yeares and from thence to the destruction of Ierusalem he reckoneth 7. weekes and an halfe more that is 53. yeares But Tertullian committeth diuerse errors in this account 1. he maketh but 5. kings of Persia. 2. he giueth but an 106. yeares to the whole Monarchie of the Persians 31 he fayleth in the particular account of the yeares of the kings of Persia he alloweth vnto Darius the Mede 19. yeares whereas he raigned but one and to the last Darius 22. yeares who raigned but sixe in all and to Alexander be giueth 12. yeares after who liued but sixe yeares after Darius ouerthowe 4. he counteth but 53. yeares from Christs natiuitie to the destruction of Ierusalem which in true account were 70. yeares at the least for Christ was borne in the 4. yeare of the 194. Olympiad and the citie was taken by Titus in the 4. yeare of the 212. Olympiad 2. Lyranus beginning his account the 5. yeare of Zedekiah when as Ieremiah promised deliuerance after 70. yeares reckoneth from that yeare to the destruction of Ierusalem 6. yeares from thence the Hebrewes to the first of Cyrus count 52. yeares then to Cyrus and Cambyses he giueth 9. yeares to Assuerus and Darius in whole 6. yeare the Temple was built 45. yeares betweene them all these yeares make beeing put together 112. yeares then the second Temple is held by the Hebrewes to haue stood vnto the second destruction by Titus 420. yeares all make 532. from whence 42. yeares beeing diducted which come betweene the blessed passion of our Lord and the destruction of Ierusalem there will remaine iust 490. yeares Paulus Burgens agreeing with Raimundus beginning and ending as Lyranus doth yet proceedeth an other way from the 4. of Zedekiah which was in the 12. yeare of Nebuchadnezzar who raigned in all 45. yeares there remained of his raigne 34. yeares and of Evilmerodachs 32. and 3. yeares of Balthazar 's raigne all these make 60. yeares then Darius raigned two Cyrus 30. Assuerus 14. Darius his sonne had raigned 6. when the Temple was finished these yeares make 52. and the second Temple stood 420. yeares as is the generall opinion of the Hebrewes