when wee haue peace in our consciences Thirdly when there is peace betweene men which ariseth out of both the former Where should this peace be established Vpon the throne of Dauid that is in the Church of God Are we not partakers of this honour of Kingdom Yes verelie as of his Priests office Rom. 6.12 Rom. 16.20 Reuel 1.6 For wee are Kings to rule and subdue our stirring and rebellious affections and to tread Satan vnder our feet What is the cause of all this The loue and zeale of God breaking through all lets either inward from our selues and our own sins or outward from the enmitie of the diuel and world 1. COR. 1.30 30 But ye are of him in Christ Iesus who of God is made vnto vs wisdom and righteousnes and sanctification redemption WHat fruit receiue we by the Kingdome of our Sauiour Christ By it all the treasures brought in by his propheticall and priestly office are dealt and made effectuall to vs continually What are those treasures They are either within vs or without vs. What is the first he here nameth within vs That he is here made vnto vs wisdome Why is this set downe as necessarie to our saluation Because it was necessarie that hauing absolutely lost all godly and sauing wisdome wherein we were first created that it should be againe repaired ere we could be partakers of life eternall Why haue wee not true wisedome naturally able to bring vs to it No verily for although we haue wisdom naturally engrafted in vs to prouide for this present life and sufficient to bring vs to condemnation in the life to come yet we haue not one graine of a sauing wisedome able to saue vs or to make vs step one foot forward to life eternall VVhere is this wisedome to be found In the word of God How come we to it 1. Tim. 6.16 Joh. 1.18 By Christ for God dwelleth in Light which no man hath approched vnto onely the sonne which was in the bosome of his father hee hath reuealed him VVhat is the second effect and that without vs That hee is made vnto vs Righteousnesse namely that we are iustified by the righteousnesse of our Sauiour Christ Is not this an absurd doctrine as that a man should be fed with the meat another eateth or to bee warmed with the clothes another weareth or be in life and health with the life and health of another No doubtlesse for if the sinne of Adam being a man were of force to condemne vs because wee were in his loines why should it seeme strange that the righteousnesse of our Sauiour Christ both God and man should bee auaileable to iustifie others Secondly although it is not meet to measure heauenly things by the yard of reason yet it is not vnreasonable considering that we haue a more strict coniunction in the spirit with him then euer wee had in nature with Adam that a man owing a thousand pounds not able of himselfe to discharge it his Creditor may be satisfied by one of his friends But how can one man saue so many Because the manhood being ioyned to the Godhead it maketh the passion and righteousnesse of Christ of infinite merit How doe you proue this righteousnesse heere to bee meant of the righteousnesse which is in Christ Because he speaketh after of sanctification which is the righteousnesse within vs. What is meant by righteousnes in this place As by the chiefe part thereof our whole iustification which is a deliuerance of vs from all sinne the guilt and punishment thereof and whereby we being accounted righteous euen by the righteousnes of our Sauiour Christ imputed vnto vs are restored to a better righteousnesse then euer we had in Adam What are the parts of iustification Two the not reckoning of our sinnes and the imputation of Christs righteousnes both which are merited by his Priesthood How did he merit the forgiuenesse of our sinnes By his sufferings in abasing himselfe especially to suffer death and so grieuously to pay the payment of our sinnes How commeth it then that Christ hauing borne the punishment of our sinnes the godly are yet in this world afflicted for them and that for the most part more then the vngodly The affliction of the godly is no punishment Ier. 12.3 but a fatherly correction and chastisement in the world that they should not perish with the world whereas the wicked the longer they are spared and the lesse they are punished in this life their danger is the greater for God reserueth their punishment to the life to come What gather you of this Ie. 12.3 That we should not grudge at the prosperity of the wicked when wee are in trouble for as the sheepe and kine are put in fat pastures to be prepared to the shambles so they the more they receiue in this life the neerer and the heauier is their destruction in the life which is to come But to returne where wee left of the forgiuenesse of sinnes is that sufficient to bring vs to the blessed presence of God No but wee must also be made righteous otherwise we cannot enter into the kingdome of heauen as a banckerupts debt being paid hee is not by and by to be made a Burgesse of a Citie without goods nor a beggerly prisoner fit to serue the Prince vnles he be new apparelled How did he merit our righteousnesse By his fulfilling the Law in that hee walked in all the commandements and failed in no duties either in the worship and seruice of God or duties towards men whereby we are made fully and wholly righteous as we were made vnrighteous by Adams sin but we are iustified by a man that is God Hitherto of righteousnesse What is sanctification Rom. 6.14 Psal 19.14 It is a freedome from the tyrannie of sin into the liberty of righteousnesse begun here and increased daily vntill it be fully perfited in the life to come What differences are there betweene Righteousnes imputed and Sanctification 1. Thes 4.3.4 Rom. 5.14.17 2. Cor. 5.21 Rom. 3.21.22 Reuel 22.11 Diuers as first Sanctification is in vs righteousnesse imputed is inherent in our Sauiour Christ Secondly the imputed righteousnesse increaseth not Sanctification doth as it were grow in vs by degrees from walking in it to a further degree of standing and from that to a sitting down in it Lastly Psal 1.1.2 Rom. 8.30 the righteousnesse of our Sauiour Christ is the root or cause Sanctification the effect Doe righteousnesse and sanctification goe together Yes in time they go together Joh. 15.2 Iam. 2.18 and as it were hand in hand for so soone as a man is made partaker of Christs Righteousnesse hee is made holy in some measure although in nature the imputed righteousnes goeth before as the cause before the effect Is there any such Sanctification or holines of life in vs as God doth accept of and will giue reward vnto None 1. Pet. 2.5 Exod. 28.36.37.38 vnlesse the
called a kingdome and therefore euery godly one shall bee a king in heauen How commeth this kingdome by grace or desert By the onely grace of God in Iesus Christ Declare the same more euidently First it is the blessing of God and therefore of grace Secondly it is giuen to vs as to heires not as the wages of a seruant which commonly deserueth more then a sonne Thirdly it was prepared for vs from the beginning of the world and therefore is of the meere loue of God and not of merit So much of the sentence What is the reason of it When Christ was an hungred they fedde him when hee was a thirst they gaue him drinke when he was naked they clothed him when he was sicke and in prison they visited him Doth not this reason plainely strengthen the doctrine of merits For. Not so seeing for importeth not heere the cause but the effect as wee say Summer is come for flowers doe spring and It is a good tree for it bringeth forth good fruit these are effects and not causes Moreouer if Christ would haue taught merit then would hee haue chosen the greatest and chiefest workes as of his owne worship in the first table else some might iustly complaine that they were not rewarded according to the measure of their good workes hauing yeelded a greater obedience to the first table then others Why then doth Christ choose those workes of the second table Because they are most manifest to the world following therein the custome of earthly Iudges who insist most vpon plainest proofes either to conuince the guiltie or cleere the innocent so Christ pronounceth his sentence rather according to workes then to faith and those of the second table rather then of the first because that workes are visible and faith inuisible and for that it is easier to play the hypocrite in the obedience of the first table then of the second Why doth Christ heere vse so long a catalogue of these workes To teach vs to exercise mercy in all those duties and not content our selues with any one of them How could they doe these things vnto Christ whom most of them did neuer see When they did any of them to the poore then they did it vnto him What gather you of this That it was a great honour to lodge Angels at vnawares in stead of strangers but this is a farre more excellent honour whereunto Christians are called being assured that in receiuing the poore they receiue Christ himselfe which should stirre vp the bowels of mercy and compassion in vs towards them seeing not so much as a cup of cold water shall bee vnrewarded But how is it that they being then immortall seeme not to know the meaning of this dutie It is set downe not to note ignorance but to teach vs the exceeding bountifulnesse of Christ which is able to astonish them in the middest of their greatest knowledge for the more men know of God the more they wonder at the vnsearchable wisedome of God So much of the former sentence What is the latter It is spoken to the wicked Depart from mee yee cursed into euerlasting fire prepared for the diuell and his Angels VVhat is the equitie of this speech It is likewise answerable to their owne desires that in their life thrust away from them the day of the Lord and bid Christ depart When doe the wicked say so to Christ When they refuse to know his will when they disdaine the ministerie the poore and the stranger or doe not prouide for them according to their abilitie What are the parts of this his iudgement First to bee depriued of Gods presence as it is a great part of glory to be continually in his presence Secondly to be euerlastingly tormented in hell fire What is the reason of this sentence It is cleane contrarie to the former in leauing those duties vndone And although the former good workes were not the causes of saluation yet these euill workes are the very next cause of damnation How can that bee Because the best workes of the godly are imperfectly good and cannot deserue life but the euill workes of the euill are perfectly euill and therefore deserue death What is to be considered in their answere Their exceeding wretchednesse whiles they liued heere that neuer considered whom they reiected in reiecting the poore Hitherto of the iudgement What say you to the execution of it Contrarie to the order of the sentences it shall beginne at the wicked for to the end the Angell that shall presently take binde and cast them into hell may attend our Sauiour Christ returning his elect triumphantly going into heauen the sentence must be first executed vpon the wicked Beside that it is agreeable to the order of iustice the Lord appointeth in the Law that the malefactors should be executed in the eye of the Iudge and the godly also that shall see it to abide euerlastingly DAN chap 12. vers 2.3 2 And many of them that sleepe in the dust of the earth shall awake some to euerlasting life and some to shame and perpetuall contempt 3 And they that be wise shall shine as the brightnesse of the firmament and they that turne many to righteousnesse shall shine as the starres for euer and euer WHat is the scope of this place The scope of the Prophet is to hold the faithfull afflicted in a constant course of duety and obedience to the Lord by consideration of the rich reward of the godly and fearefull punishment of the wicked at the second glorious comming of Christ It seemeth by the word many that all shall not rise There seemeth indeed to bee some aduantage giuen to the Iewes who of the first Psalme gather that there is no resurrection of the wicked which notwithstanding is manifestly confuted euen by this place it selfe where it is said that many shall awake to shame euerlasting And when he saith many the word is not restrained to either the iust or wicked but as many of the good should awake and not all so many of the wicked should awake and not all How then is this to be taken It is taken seuerally by it selfe as one whole which is diuided into his parts As if he should say an infinite number shall awake an infinite or a great number of iust and an infinite or great number of the wicked And the like forme of speech to this is vsed of the Apostle Rom. 5. vers 15.19 he saith that many are dead by the sinne of Adam and yet in the 18. vers he sheweth that by those many hee meaneth all and so speaketh that all were condemned in Adam Likewise in the 18. vers it is said that the benefit of Christs death commeth to all meaning the faithfull that by faith are one with Christ as we were all naturally with Adam yet in the 15. and 19. verses those that he called all he tearmeth many Although if he speake of the wicked by themselues and of
and without al truce and therefore that here it is wherein we must shew our choler our hate our valour our strength not faintly and in shew only but in truth where we being collered with our enemie leaue our fight with him to fight against our brethren yea against our owne soules he continually and without ceasing fighting with vs and not against his owne as the blasphemous Pharisies said Matth. 12.24 What is the sentence against the woman First in the paine of conception and bearing Secondly in the paine of bringing foorth wherein is contained the paine of nurcing and bringing them vp Thirdly in a desire to her husband Fourthly in her subiection to her husband Was she not before desirous and subiect vnto her husband Yes but her desire was not so great through conscience of her infirmitie nor her subiection was so painfull and the yoke thereof so heauie VVhat is the sentence against Adam First his sinne is put in the sentence and then the punishment What was his sinne One that hee obeyed his wife whom he should haue commanded then that hee disobeyed God whom he ought to haue obeyed the first being proper to him the other common to his wife with him VVhat was the punishment A punishment which although it be more heauie vpon Adam yet it is also common to the woman namely the curse of the earth for his sake frō whence came barrennes by thistles and thornes c. Whereof first the effect should be sorrow and grief of mind Secondly labour to the sweat of his browes to draw necessarie food from it and that as long as hee liued Lastly the expulsion out of Paradise to liue with the beasts of the earth and to eate of the herbe which they did eate of What learne you from thence That all men from him that sitteth in the throne to him that draweth water are bound to painfull labour either of the body or of the minde what wealth or patrimonie soeuer is left them although hee had wherewith otherwise plentifully to liue But it was said that at what time soeuer they ate of it they should certainly die And so they were dead in sin which is more fearfull then the death of the bodie as that which is a separation from God whereby they were alreadie entred vpon death and hell to which they should haue proceeded vntill it had bin accomplished both in bodie and soule in hell with the Diuell and his angels for euer if the Lord had not looked vpon them in the blessed seed How doth it agree with the goodnes or with the very iustice of God to punish one so fearfully for eating of a little fruit Very well for the sin was horrible first by doubting of the truth of God Secondly a crediting of the word of Gods enemie and theirs Thirdly a charge against God that he enuied their good estate Fourthly intollerable pride and ambition in desiring to be equall in knowledge to God himselfe Last of all which much aggrauateth the sin for that the commandement he brake was so easie to be kept as to abstaine from one only fruite in so great plentie and varietie VVhat obserue you else I obserue further out of this verse and out of the two next Heb. 3.2 that in the middest of Gods anger hee remembreth mercie for it is a benefit to Adam that he may liue of the sweat of his browes To Euah that she should bring foorth and not be in continual trauell vnto them both that he taught them wisedome to make leather coates VVhat learne you from that it is said that God made them coates That in euery profitable inuention for the life of men God is to be acknowledged the author of it and haue the honour of it and not the wit of man that inuented it as it is the manner of men in such cases to sacrifice to their owne nets Heb. 1.16 When there were better meanes of clothing why did they were leather It seemeth that thereby they should draw themselues the rather to repentance and humiliation by that course clothing What learne you from thence That howsoeuer our condition and state of calling affoord vs better aray yet wee learne euen in the best of our clothes to be humbled by them as those which are giuen to couer our shame and carrie alwaies the marke and badge of our sinne especiallie when these which were euen after the fall the goodliest creatures that euer liued learned that lesson by them VVhat followeth A sharp taunt that the Lord giueth Adam vers 22. further to humble him as if he should say Now Adam doest thou not see and feele how greatly thou art deceiued in thinking to be like God by eating of the forbidden fruite VVhat learne you from it That by the things wee thinke to be most esteemed contrarie to the will of God we are most subiect to derision and that it must not be a plaine and common speech but a laboured speech that must bring vs to repentance VVhy doth God banish him out of Paradise lest hee should liue if he could eate of the tree of life seeing there is no corporall thing able to giue life to any that sinne hath killed It is true that the eating of the fruite of the tree of life would not haue recouered him but the Lord therefore would haue him banished from it lest hee should fall into a vaine confidence thereof to the end to make him to seeke for grace Wherefore are the Angels set with a glittering sword to keepe them from the tree of life To increase their care to seeke vnto Christ being banished from it without hope of comming so much as to the signe of life VVhat learne you from hence The necessarie vse of keeping obstinate sinners from the Sacraments and other holy things in the Church ROM chap. 5. vers 12 13 14. 12 Wherefore as by one man sinne entred into the world and death by sinne and so death went ouer all men forasmuch as all men haue sinned 13 For vnto the time of the Law was sinne in the world but sinne is not imputed while there is no Law 14 But death reigned from Adam to Moses euen ouer them also that sinned not after the like manner of the transgression of Adam which was the figure of him that was to come What is the principall scope of this place To shew that the sinne of one Adam eating the forbidden fruit is the sinne of all men How is the sinne called the sinne of one man when as both Adam and Euah sinned which are two and that Euah sinned before Adam In the name of Adam are comprehended the man and the woman for by mariage two are made one and Moses calleth both the man and the woman Adam And last of all the Apostle vseth a word here signifying both man and woman VVhat ground is there that all the posteritie of Adam should sinne in that one sinne that they neuer did The reason hereof is
confession that we haue sinned both originally and actually another that there is no power in vs to satisfie for them 1. Iohn 1.8.9 Psalm 32.3.4 Prou. 28.13 Iob 31.33 1. Sam. 15.19.20 Psalm 51.3.4.5.6 Acts 22.3.4.5 1. Tim. 1.13 What vse is there of confession Great for that we haue naturally a senselesnesse of sinne or else being conuinced thereof we are readie to lessen it and make it light The contrary wherof appeareth in the children of God How can a man confesse his sinnes being not known and without number Those that are knowne wee must expresly confesse Psalm 19.12 and the other that are vnknowne and cannot be reckoned generally How appeareth it that we are not able to pay it Because by the Law as by an obligation euery one being bound to keepe it wholly Deut 27.26 Gal. 3.10 and continually so that the breach thereof euen once and in the least point maketh vs presently debters there is no man that can either auoid the breach of it or when he hath broken it make amends vnto God for it considering that whatsoeuer he doth after the breach is both imperfectly done and if it were perfect yet it is due by obligation of the law and therefore cannot goe for paiment no more then a man can pay one debt with another What doth it draw with it that causeth it to be so impossible to be satisfied Rom. 6.23 The reward of it which is euerlasting death both of bodie and soule The greatnesse and also number whereof is declared by the parable of 10000. talents which no man is able to pay being not able to satisfie so much as one farthing But are we not able to satisfie some part of it as a man in great debt is sometimes able to make some satisfaction especially if he haue day giuen him Exech 16.4.5 No and therefore wee are compared to a child new borne red with blood not able to wash himself nor to helpe himselfe Luke 4.18 Matth. 12.19 and to captiues close shut vp in prison and fetters kept by a strong one so that there is as small likelihood of our deliuerance out of the power of Satan as that a poore lamb should deliuer it selfe from the gripes and pawes of a lion What is the meanes to free vs from this debt By this petition Christ teacheth vs that being pressed with the burden of our Sinne Matth. 11.28 Esay 55.1 we should flee vnto the mercie of God and to intreat him for the forgiuenesse of our debt euen the cancelling of our obligation that in law it be not auaileable against vs in which respect the preaching of the Gospel is compared to the yeere of Iubilie Luke 4.19 when no man might demand his debt of his brother How shall we obtaine this at Gods hands By the onely blood and suffering of Christ as the only ransome for sin Contrary to the Papists who confessing that originall sin is taken away by Christ in Baptisme doe teach that we must make part of satisfaction for our actuall sins and therefore the Iesuites whip themselues as if their blood might satisfie for sinne which is abominable to thinke of Do we here pray for these sinnes of this day as before for the bread of this day Not onely for them but also for all that euer wee haue done at all times before to the end that wee might be the further confirmed in the assurance of the remission of all our sinnes What is further to be considered in this petition That as in the former by bread more was vnderstood so here by the forgiuenesse of sinnes which is the first part of iustification the other is also meant namely Dan. 9.24 the imputation of righteousnes for as Christ hath taken away our sinnes by suffering so hee hath also clothed vs with his righteousnesse by fulfilling of the Law for vs. What need was there of this Because we could not appeare naked before God for as it is not enough for a beggar to come before a King to want his ragges vnlesse he haue conuenient apparell and ornaments so for vs it is not enough to haue our filthinesse done away vnlesse we bee clothed with conuenient righteousnesse not enough to put off our shackels and manacles vnlesse we haue garters and bracelets to decke vs with What else is vnderstood here Zach. 12.10 Mark 9.24 Wee pray for the spirit of prayer whilest with griefe and sorrow for our sinnes we may craue pardon for our sinnes and increase of faith So much of the former part What is set downe in the latter A true note to certifie vs whether out sinnes are forgiuen vs or not by that we forgiue or not forgiue others that haue offended vs and it is a reason of the former Matth. 9.2 Mark 2.7 Iob 14.4 Esay 43.25 But seeing God alone forgiueth sinnes here vnderstood by the word debt how is it said that we forgiue sinnes Wee forgiue not the sinne so farre as it is sinne against God but so farre as it bringeth griefe and hindrance vnto vs we may forgiue it How is the reason drawne Matth. 5.7 6.14.15 From the lesse to the more thus if we wretched sinners vpon earth can forgiue others how much more will the gracious God of heauen forgiue vs if we hauing but a drop of mercy can forgiue others much more will God who is a sea full of grace 1. Ioh. 2.10 3.14 especially when wee by forgiuing sometimes suffer losse whereas from God by forgiuing vs nothing falleth away Doth this reason tie God to forgiue vs No otherwise then by his gratious and free promise for it is a necessarie consequent and fruit of the other and not a cause considering the inequalitie betweene our debt vnto God and mens debts vnto vs. Wherein standeth the inequalitie First in the number of our debts to God being compared to ten thousand mens debts to vs to one hundred Secondly in the waight our debts to God being compared to talents and those to men being compared to pence How riseth this great inequalitie in the waight From the great inequalitie betweene God and man for if to strike a King bee much more hainous then to strike a poore subiect what is it then to strike God who is infinitely greater then all the Kings of the earth What is to be gathered of this That as this is a testimonie to our hearts that if we can heartilie forgiue others God will forgiue vs so on the otherside if wee can shew no fauour to others we may looke for none at the hands of God and therefore to pray without forgiuing such as haue offended vs were not onely a meere babling but also a procuring of Gods wrath more heauilie against vs. What learne you from hence The hypocrisie of many which assuring themselues in great confidence of the forgiuenes of their sinnes yet cannot find in their hearts to forgiue others Are we heereby bound to forgiue
the godly by themselues it may bee truely said that neither all the wicked nor all the godly shall awake out of the dust because some of both sorts shall not die but be changed onely 1. Cor. 15. What doe you consider in this text Two things one of the perfect happines of the good and the other of the vtter vnhappines of the wicked VVhat doth this text teach of the first Two things the first of the happinesse which is common to all the good in the second verse and the other of the speciall happinesse that some shall haue aboue their fellowes in the third From whence commeth this happinesse both common and speciall From our communication and participation with God in Christ which is set forth Apocal. 21.3 by that God will dwell with vs and we with him and Apocal. 3.20 Luk. 22.20 by similitude of eating and drinking with him and eating of the tree of life and of the hidden manna Apocal. 2.17 glorious clothes Apoc. 3.5 of rule and dominion Apoc. 2.26.27.28 VVherein standeth the happinesse common to all Partly in freedome from all euill and partly in the inioying of the fulnesse of that is good How is the first set forth Hee shall wipe away all teares there shall bee no more death no sicknesse no sorrow no crying no labour no darkenesse Apocal. 22.5 no not so much as the danger or perill or feare of any euill Apocal. 21.25 the gates shall not bee shut and therefore in their minds and soules they shall bee free from all those good affections that haue any paine ioyned with them as wrath mercy pitie compassion feare care repentance and such like How describe you the second First by a comparison of the lesse of the very dead and dumbe creatures which shall be partakers of immortality and of a kind of glory for the elects sake how much more shall they be glorious Againe it is described more generally by a comparison of the lesse in that it shall be better then euer Adams was in his greatest happines although he had neuer fallen Rom. 5. Yea what if I should say that the holy and blessed Angels shall not haue so full felicitie for that they are not members of Christ as we be although elect in Christ Lay forth this enioying of good things more particularly We may consider it either by that which is without or else that within vs. How consider you that which is without Reuel 21.10 The place which they shall be in for the pleasant situation likened to a high hill Psal 15. as that which is aboue the stars for the delicacy of it compared to the Paradise But especially described Apoc. 22. set forth by comparison of the lesse the land of Canaan incorruptible vndefiled and that which withereth not 1. Pet. 1. How else By the company wee shall haue and fellowship with the Saints and Angels in which respect eternal life is set forth partly by being with Abraham Isaac and Iacob and 2. Thes 2. the Apostle adiureth vs by the great assemblie And we see what delight the Apostles tooke to see Moses and Elias so as they would faine haue had them taried with them although through their infirmity they were afraid of the sight of them how much more then shall the ioy be when we shall behold their glory without all feare and astonishment And specially in beholding the glory of our Sauiour Christ from whom also commeth all the good of the Saints and Angels we shall delight in Iohn 17.24 Apoc. 22.4 1. Iohn 3.2 And they shall see his face that is Christs visiblie with the eies of their bodies of the Father and the holy Ghost with the eyes of their soules Iohn 3.3 Hitherto of the happinesse and good without them How consider you that in themselues First in their bodies and then in their soules How in their bodies That they shall bee made conformable vnto the glorious body of our Sauiour Christ Phil. 3. whose glory hath been told before And therefore they are said that they shall shine as the sun Matth. 13.43 So that Absaloms beautifull body which had neuer spot or wenne in it from the top of the head to the sole of the foot is but a shadow of that beauty and comelinesse that shall be in the bodies of the Saints How in their soules Their knowledge shall bee perfect for wee shall know as we are knowne 1. Iohn 3.1 Which is set out by comparison of the lesse that our knowledge then shall differ from that now as the knowledge of a child differeth from the knowledge of a perfect man and as the knowledge by a glasse differeth from the knowledge by seeing the thing it selfe as knowledge of a plaine speech from that which is a riddle that we need not doubt but that wee shall know one another there especially seeing our Sauiour Christ setteth forth the estate of the blessed by knowledge one of another Matth. 17. And as the knowledge is perfect so the vnderstanding and memorie How further Our holinesse shall bee perfect and our loue 1. Cor. 13. What is the measure and quantitie of this good which all shall enioy 1. Cor. 2.9 Reuel 2.17 It is vnspeakable great such as neither eye hath seene eare hath heard nor hath entred into the mind of any and which none but God knoweth Esa 64.4 and he which doth enioy them Hitherto of the felicitie common to all What is that which is speciall It is described in the third verse where hee saith that those that haue taught many and iustified many or as the Apostle speaketh saued many 1. Tim. 4. that is haue beene the Lords good instruments to saue many shall shine as the firmament and as the principall starres and bee preferred before those whom they haue taught Eccles 8.1 for if the skill of interpreting a matter do lighten and cause the face to shine in this life it will much more cause it to shine in the life to come Shall all teachers haue one glory No for as heere it is said that the Ministers shall excell others so 1. Cor. 4. it is declared that one Teacher shall haue greater glorie then another as hee that planteth and layeth the ground worke more then he that watereth and buildeth vpon it But amongst those that are no Ministers shall not there be difference of glory Yes as the Martyrs shall bee preferred before the rest Apocal. 3.12 for euery one shall not bee a pillar in the Church and as euery one hath gone beyond others in right vse of the gifts bestowed vpon him so he shall receiue his reward more or lesse But it seemeth this doctrine should argue some want in those that haue lesse None at all for all shall bee full although one haue more then another as a vessell containing a gallon is as full for the bignesse as that which containeth ten and the foot may for the proportion of a foot be as beautifull as the hand although it haue not so much beautie in it as the hand which would be no grace in the body Howbeit this doctrine seemeth necessarilie to draw merit with it Not so for albeit they receiue according to their workes yet they receiue it not for their workes And as God bestowing greater graces vpon one heere in this life more then vpon another is not therefore esteemed to haue bestowed them in regard of merit so in bestowing greater felicity in the life to come vpon one more then another is not to bee esteemed to doe it for merit Hitherto of the happinesse of the elect What is the vnhappinesse of the reprobate It may be easilie gathered by the contrarie of that which hath beene spoken of the happinesse of the elect FINIS