due to vs for the sinne of Adam vnlesse we be freed by Christ The Arminians doe not much differ from this opinion who doe not care who they imitate so they inuent something that may make for the safeguard of their errour Pag. 388. in Tilenum Arnoldus after Arminius doth teach that Originall sinne hath no respect of vice or sinne properly so called for nothing is sinne or vice vnlesse it be committed by the free-will In the same place hee denieth that Originall sin deserues punishment but saith that it is a punishment And he doth confesse Pag. 389. 390. that Arminius doth deny that Originall sinne is sinne properly so called Arminius himselfe Resp ad 9. Quaest P. 174. hath these words It is peruersely said that Originall sinne doth make a man guilty of death XIII The reasoning then of Saint Paule the Apostle doth fall to the ground Rom. 5.13.14 where speaking of sinne which hath flowed from Adam into his posterity when he had said That sinne was in the world vntill the Law hee afterward proues it by the death of the infants who were dead before the daies of Moses Death saith he raigned from Adam to Moses euen ouer them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adams transgression that is ouer infants which had not sinned actually Hee thereby proueth that sinne was in those infants because death is the fruit and punishment of sinne Seeing therefore the death of infants is a punishment of Originall sinne if this Originall sinne were not truely sinne but onely the punishment of sinne then this death of infants would be the punishment of a punishment and not the punishment of sinne but to say that God doth punish punishments and not sinnes is vncomely for any especially for those who professe themselues to be maintainers of Gods iustice XIV And if the Originall blot of infants is not sinne but onely the punishment of sinne they are baptised in vaine For baptisme is not profitable to wash away punishments but to wash away sinnes In vain are they washed that are without the filth of sin Why is it necessary men should be borne againe but because they are dead in sinne Whence is that peruersenes by which naturally men are prone to euill but from vice and what is this vice but sinne XV. But you say it is not sinne vnlesse it be voluntary I confesse it if you speake of actuall sinnes but if you speake of the naturall staine and blot it is not necessary that this naturall blot be procured by euery one 's owne will it is enough if it be contrary to the Law For this is the best difinition of sinne that Saint Iohn layeth downe that sinne is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the breach of the Law And it cannot be doubted but that that is contrary to the law which doth stirre vp a man to rebell against the law For although Originall sinne hath not yet stirred vp the infant to sinne in act yet is it apt and prone to stirre him vp No otherwise then the Snake which hath not yet infected any one with her poysoning biting hath yet an engrafted poyson in her and a naturall readinesse to hurt Originall sinne also may be said to be voluntary because by it we sinne voluntarily and also because we sinned in Adam and therefore in him wee were desirous of this corruption Finally wee must rather beleeue Saint Paul that teacheth vs that sinne is in infants then these men who strike themselues with their owne stings and entangle themselues XVI For seeing that the Arminians teach that by the death of Christ all mankinde is reconciled to God and that remission of sinnes is obtained for all men I demand for what sinnes are infants punished and doe fall into torments of body and doe suffer the assaults of Diuels Is it for the sinne of Adam that the Arminians affirme is forgiuen them Is it for any actuall sinne they haue committed none It remaines therefore that they are punished for Originall sinne Vide Aransic Concil secund Chap. 2. vnlesse we will brand God with the marke of iniustice as he that torments the innocents and they that are guilty of no sinne CHAP. IX How the sinne of Adam may belong to his posteritie and how many waies it may passe to his of spring And first of the imputation and whether the sinnes of the Grandfather and great-Grandfathers are imputed to their posterity I. THe sinne of Adam doth passe to his posterity by two meanes by imputation propagation II. The punishments which all men suffer in the name of Adam doe argue that the sinne of Adam is imputed to vs This the Apostle teacheth Rom. 5.12 Death passed on all men by one man in whom all men sinned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or because all men sinned in him For the sinne of Adam was not onely personall neither did hee sinne as a singular person but as carrying all mankinde in the stocke and originall no otherwise then Christ satisfying for vs on the crosse hath not suffred as a priuate person but as sustaining and representing the whole Church in the head Saint Paul 2 Cor. 5.15 speaketh thus If one dyed for all all likewise were dead And Rom. 6. doth affirme that we are dead and crucified with Christ If therefore we dyed in Christ dying and were crucified with him it is no doubt but that it may likewise be said that we sinned in Adam For if the satisfaction and righteousnesse of the second Adam be imputed to vs why shall not the sinne of the first Adam be imputed to vs seeing that therefore the righteousnesse of Christ is imputed to vs that the sinne of Adam might not be imputed to vs III. Reason it selfe doth consent to this for if Adam had receiued good things not for himself alone but for his posterity it is no maruell if being spoiled of these good things he lost them for himselfe and his posterity If any one be capitally punished for treason and brought to extreame pouerty his children also with him doe loose their Nobility Nor is any thing more equall then that the sonne should pay his fathers debts and that as they are heires of their estates so they might be heires of their debts IV. But in this similitude there is one and that a notable difference that is when the debter hath wasted the inheritance and there is more in debt then in goods the sonne may renounce the inheritance and leaue his fathers goods But here this yeelding vp cannot be made because to the guilt by the sinne of Adam there commeth also the naturall deprauation and contagion like as he that is borne of parents infected which leprosie which contagion cannot be put off when they please V. Although these things are grounded vpon the word of God and the very rule of iustice yet they seeme to be charged and followed with great discommodities First that in Ezekiell Chap. 18. v. 20. doth offer it selfe The
the sinnes of their Ancestors Arminius ought not to extend it to so many ages seeing the law doth not extend the visitation of the iniquity of the fathers vpon the children beyond the third and fourth generation And that because a man can scarce liue so long as to see his issue beyond the third or fourth generation For therefore are children punished their fathers beholding it that griefe might thereby increase to their parents and that the fathers might be punished by the misâ—ries of the children which is a cause to me of suspecting that this visitation of the sinne of the fathers vpon the children ought to be vnderstood of temporall and not of eternall punishments VII But to that which was said that the punishment was greater then the sinne because they which in Adam sinned onely in power are for his sinne punished in act it is easie to answere For wee so sinned in Adam in power that also the sinne was in vs in act neither doe we onely beare the punishment of anothers sinne but also of our owne nor is it any maruaile if God hath pardoned Adam and doth not pardon many of his posterity for Adam beleeued and repented but these refuse the grace of God offred and persist in impenitency CHAP. X. Of the propagation of the sinne of Adam to his posteritie where also of the traduction of the soule and of sinne it selfe WE haue already said that the sinne of Adam is conueyed to his posterity two manner of wayes by Imputation and Propagation Of imputation it hath been spoken now we are to speake of Propagation I. That the sinne of Adam hath infected all mankinde with an hereditary deprauation and that this contagion hath farre spred it selfe hath beene abundantly proued by those places by which we haue declared that euery man was conceiued and borne in sinne As by one man sinne entred into the World and death by sinne so death went ouer all in whom all men sinned Rom. 5. II. And if any one would exactly view the manner and circumstances of Adams sinne he shall finde that in euery man the character and no obscure image of that first sinne is deepely impressed for there is engrafted in euery man curiosity desire of knowing those thin gs which pertaine nothing to him and also a distrustfull haesitation and doubting of the word of God And as Adam laid the fault vpon his wife and his wife vpon the Serpent so is it naturall to euery man to couer his fault with anothers fault Also flight and trembling at the meeting of God lying dissembling and a sense of vndecent nakednesse are in all men by nature and are deriued into posterity from that fountaine and to these things we are not taught but made not instructed but infected To these things we doe not onely not need a master but contrary to the teaching of masters and to discipline all stayes and barres being broken wee returne to them nature being conqueror III. As therefore the egges of the Aspe are iustly broken and serpents new bred are iustly killed although they haue yet poysoned none so infants are rightly obnoxious and subiect to punishments For although they haue not yet sinned in act yet there is in them that contagious pestilence and that naturall pronenesse to sinne IV. But hence ariseth a question hard to be dissolued to wit by what meanes sinne is traduced from parents to their posterity and how mens soules may draw this deprauation For seeing all things that God doth are good it is not credible nor likely that God put Originall sinne into mens soules For how should he punish those soules which hee himselfe had corrupted And if he created the soule pure and iust but being included in the body it is defiled with the contagion other discommodities no whit lesse doe arise For to include a pure and innocent soule in a stinking prison and to thrust it as it were into a bridewell that it might bee corrupted there doth not seeme to agree with the iustice and goodnesse of God V. Hereto is added also that sin is the deprauation of the soule not of the body for sin is a spirituall thing a vice of the will the body therefore cannot giue that to the soule which it hath not And seeing the body doth not sinne but when the soule doth vse the body as an organ to sinne Rom. 6.13 it is manifest that sinne doth passe from the soule into the body and not from the body into the soule to which thing the very sinne of Adam is a cleere testimony to vs For Adam first sinned in will before hee stretched forth his hand to the forbidden Apple Caluin saw this who in the first chapter of the second booke of his Institutions hath these words This contagion hath not its cause in the substance of the flesh or of the soule but because it was so appointed by God that what gifts hee had bestowed vpon the first man he should haue them and also loose them both for himselfe and his VI. Here is a way that is obscure and slippery in which we must goe with wary steppes I doe not propound to my selfe to satisfie them that are braine-sicke and wickedly acute I will onely set downe those things which seeme to mee to be agreeable to the word of God and to reason whereunto that the way may be made plaine some things are to be spoken of the originall of the soule and of the traduction of it VII Origen following Plato was of opinion that all soules were at first created together with the Angels and afterwards put into bodies This hee disputes lib. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 7. Tertullian will haue the soule to be conueyed with the seede and the soule of the sonne to be from the soule of the father which is not to be marueiled at in him who doth contend that the soule is the body lib de anima Chap. 5. Saint Ierome in his Epistle to Marcellina and Anapsychia doth witnesse that the greater part of the west were of the same opinion Saint Austin hath writ foure bookes of the originall of the soule in which he leaueth this question vndecided neither dares hee rashly determine any thing And his second booke of retractations Chap. 56. doth witnes that hee continued in that doubt to his death Yet in his 157. Epistle hee doth debate with Tertullian and doth more incline to the contrary opinion VIII But we determin that the reasonable soule is infused into the * i e. The childe conceiued and not yet borne embryon but not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to come from without as Aristotle would haue it lib. 2. de generat animal Cap. 3. But we thinke that it is formed by God in the fruit and in the rudiment of mans body being led thereto by the authority of the Scripture whereunto reason and the nature of the soule it selfe doth agree IX Moses Numb 27.16 saith thus to God Let the Lord the
be more loued then by dying for them For although it be greater loue to die for ones enemies then for his friends yet it is certaine that nothing can be performed for thy friends sake by which thou maist more testifie thy loue to them then if thou die for them Seeing therefore that this is the greatest loue to die for one whether friend or enemie it must needes be that Christ equally loued all men with his greatest loue They must therefore affirme if they will be constant to themselues that Christ in dying loued with his greatest loue Iudas Pilate yea Cain and Pharaoh who were already in hell XVIII The conferrers at the Hage doe endeauour to quit themselues If say they to loue in the highest degree is not onely to merit saluation but also to bestow it we denie that Christ did generally loue all those in the highest degree for whom he died They therefore condemne Christ and accuse him of a lie who will haue this to be the greatest degree of loue to die for one And it is impossible that Christ should loue any one in the highest degree of loue but that also hee should bestow saluation vpon him And if these things could be separated yet this would remaine firme and sure that Christ loued him with his greatest loue for whom hee died although hee hath not afterwards bestowed saluation vpon him because the greatnesse of the loue of Christ is to be esteemed not by the profit that commeth to him for whom hee died but by the greatnesse of the sorrowes which hee suffered for him Yea whosoeuer shall weigh these things in the exact scale of iudgement shall finde that it is greater loue to suffer death for one to procure for him some little good then to procure great good So it is more flagrant loue to expose himselfe to death that his friend might not be hurt no not a little then if he should doe it that his friend should not perish by being burnt aliue XIX Nor doe they escape by the distinction of this loue into Antecedent and Consequent seeing the Antecedent loue wherewith they will haue Iudas and Pharaoh to be loued by Christ cannot but be the greatest and that beyond which as Christ himselfe witnesseth none can be extended These are not two loues to be willing to haue mercy before faith and to be willing to saue after faith but they are two effects of one and the same loue XX. And if Christ by his death was the pledge and price of redemption for Iudas Pharaoh Saul c. The marke of iniustice would be set vpon God who hath taken two punishments for the same sinnes when the first satisfaction did suffice and hath twice giuen iudgement vpon the same thing For once they were dead in Christ seeing Christ sustained their person vpon the crosse and yet the same men doe die the eternall death in their owne persons Thence also it will follow that Christ did in vaine beare the punishments due to Iudas and Pharaoh and that hee in vaine made himselfe a pledge for them For surely if Christ on the crosse was the pledge of all and seuerall men and made himselfe for them as a surety it must needes be that hee supplied their place on the crosse and sustained their person And so that may be said of all men without exception which the Apostle saith 2. Corinth 5.14 If one died for all then were all dead But no man yet as I know hath dared to say that the reprobates died with Christ or in Christ And truely the following words of the Apostle doe argue that he doth not speake of all men in the whole world but of all those to whom the fruit of the resurrection of Christ doth pertaine and who are become new creatures XXI That reconciliation is purchased onely for the elect the Apostle teacheth Rom. 5.11 Wee ioy in God through Iesus Christ our Lord by whom wee haue now receiued reconciliation Did S. Paul so greatly reioyce in that benefit which was common to him with Herod and Pilate And C. 3. v. 25. God hath set forth Christ to be a propitiation through faith in his blood There is therefore no propâ—tiation without faith and therefore no obtaining of reconciliation For hereby it is perceiued that God is pacified to a sinner and his propitiation is made because Christ hath obtained reconciliation for him XXII In the eight Chapter and foure and thirtieth verse of the same Epistle it is not onely said that Christ died for the elect but because that Christ died for them the Apostle doth thence inferre that no accusation can be laid against them Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect It is God that iustifieth Who shall condemne It is Christ that died c. Out of which place we thus argue They for whom Christ died cannot be condemned nor can any thing be laid to their charge But the reprobates are condemned and something is laid to their charge therefore Christ died not for them So it be vnderstood in that sence which I said at the beginning to wit that Christ by his death did not obtaine reconciliation and saluation for them XXIII Those for whom Christ obtained reconciliation and remission of sinnes for those he also prayed and made intercession But he doth not make intercession nor pray for the world but onely for the faithfull as Christ himselfe saith Iohn 17.9 I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast giuen me It is no doubt but that by the world those that doe not beleeue are to be vnderstood and those that haue not receiued the grace of Christ amongst whom also are refractary persons For these Christ saith he doth not pray Now all men are such by nature being destitute not onely of faith but also of the power of beleeuing But among these God giueth some men to Christ to whom also hee giueth faith in Christ For these alone Christ doth professe that he maketh intercession to his father XXIV Here the sectaries after their manner doe vse a sleight distinction For they make a double intercession one generall whereby Christ doth make intercession for all the other particular whereby hee doth make intercession onely for the faithfull By the first reconciliation of sinnes is obtained by the other the applying of reconciliation and saluation But this generall intercession is plainely needelesse for in vaine is reconciliation asked without the application of saluation By that generall intercession Christ eyther asked saluation for Iudas and Pilate or else hee did not aske If he asked not his intercession was to no purpose If he asked he suffered the repulse and so in vaine he made intercession But hee himselfe saith Iohn 11.42 that he was alwaies heard by his father But perhaps they will haue Christ to haue asked the application of saluation for all men on a condition to wit if they will beleeue and with this respect
driuen into sinnes by the diuine power Neither doth Thomas teach things vnlike these in his Commentary vpon the Epistle to the Romanes and the ninth Chapter CHAP. IIII. Of the will of God I. THE will in man is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the rationall appetite whereby man of his own accord with knowledge doth moue himselfe to obtaine good whether it be truely good or good onely in shew and in the opinion of man But sometimes the will is not taken for the faculty whereby wee will but for the act of willing or desiring sometimes it is taken for the thing it selfe which wee will after the same manner as Saint Paule speaketh 1. Thes 4. That the will of God is our sanctification II. Will in God is not a rationall appetite for God is not capable of any appetite yea nor reason But the will of God is that act of willing whereby hee doth eyther command or appoint and decree III. For the will of God is two-fold the one is his decree the other is his commandement The decree of God belongeth to the prouidence of God and the commandement of God belongeth to his iustice By his decree hee doth appoint and dispose the euents of things by his commandement hee doth gouerne our actions By the former will God doth appoint what he will haue done by the latter what he would haue vs doe To the former all creatures obey euen the Diuels themselues to the latter onely the faithfull and yet not that perfectly IV. These faithfull men are esteemed iust not because they obey the decree of God but because they are obedient to his commandement So the wicked sonne wishing the death of his sicke father doth sinne against the will of God although his wicked minde doth consent with the decree of God On the other side the sonne which doth pray to God for the health of his sicke father doth obey the will of God although by the decree of God his death is certaine and the desire of the good sonne is contrary to the purpose of God God forbids murther and yet hee decreed that the Iewes should kill Christ by which fact they sinned against God howsoeuer they fulfilled his decree Act. 2.23 Vorstius himselfe doth acknowledge That God would not haue had his people so soone sent away by Pharaoh viz. because God had decreed not to bend the heart of Pharaoh to obedience But as concerning the commandement it is no doubt but God commanded Pharaoh that hee should send away the people without delay for therefore God inflicted vpon him so many scourges because he did not obey the commandement of God Neither by this will Vorstius make God guilty of Hypocrisie or fraudulent dissimulation as he doth falsely lay to our charge V. These two willes the Scripture doth sometimes mixe and take them promiscuously one for another So when Christ Iohn 6. saith that he descended from Heauen that hee might not doe his owne will but the will of him that sent him it is certaine that Christ vnderstandeth both these two willes because Christ by those actions did both fulfill all righteousnesse and also did execute the decree of God And therefore eyther of these willes is called the purpose of God Esay 46.10 Luke 7.30 Act. 20.27 VI. This decree of God is properly and by it selfe called the will of God the law of God is not so properly called his will for the law is rather a document or lesson then his will and rather a declaration wherein God doth make knowne to man by what meanes he may be pleased then what hee hath absolutely appointed to come to passe For onely of the will of God so properly called is that true which is saide Psalme 115. God doth whatsoeuer hee will VII The promises and threatnings of God are yet more improperly called the will of God seeing by them God doth neither command nor decree any thing absolutely but they are declarations whereby God doth declare what shall come to passe if man obey the law or if he doe not obey it if man beleeue the Gospell or if he doe not beleeue it Perhaps the promises and threatnings of God Obiect are his conditionall decree and depending vpon the performance of the condition by the pleasure of man But this cannot truely be said For if it should be so Answ this decree would not be certaine by the will of God although the euent was certainely foreseene by him Also nothing can be imagined more absurd then to appoint God to decree any thing with a condition which condition in the very moment in which hee decrees it he knoweth will neuer be fulfilled When a master saith to a seruant if you will doe thus you shall haue this reward he doth declare that hee will then giue the reward when the condition is fulfilled But God willeth nothing which hee willed not from eternity Indeede God doth promise life vnder the condition of obedience but hee doth decree nothing vnder that doubtfull condition Hee doth not elect Peter if hee shall beleeue but hee electeth him to faith that he might be saued Neither was he onely willing to preserue the Niniuites if they would be turned but hee also gaue them repentance whereby they turned VIII They which say that Gods decree is his secret will but his commandement his reuealed will seeme to me to speake inconsiderately For many things are made knowne to vs of the decrees of God not onely those things which are made manifest by the euents but also may other things which God in his word hath taught vs shall come to passe As the comming of Christ the resurrection c. IX Thomas and the Schoole-men doe distinguish the will of God In voluntatem beneplaciti voluntatem signi Into the will of his good pleasure and the will of his signe that is his signified and reuealed will The members of which distinction fall one into another For many things of the will of his good pleasure are signified to vs Neither is the word beneplaciti good pleasure which in Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sufficiently applyed heere For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or good-pleasure doth for the most part include Loue and good-will as Luke 2.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 On earth peace towards men good will See also Ephes 1.5 9. But the decree of God is also extended to his iudgements and to the punishment of the wicked X. They doe very ill which set these two willes one against another and would haue them be contrary Surely if God should driue a man to doe those things which hee hath forbidden to be done or should keepe backe him who is indeauouring to obey the Law with an opposite barre from his obedience God should will things that are contrary and should resist his owne will But his decree doth not resist his commandement when he doth require those things from man which doe exceede mans power and doth not minister to man that ability whereby
They therefore doe inuert the nature of things who say that God decreed that Adam should sinne because hee had determined to send Christ who should cure Adams sinne when rather God decreed to send Christ because Adam was to sinne Man did not sinne that Christ should abolish sinne but Christ came that he might abolish sinne Here is nothing said that ought to trouble tender eares or which should make God partaker of sinne which yet if any one doth either not conceiue or not digest it is better to accuse his owne dulnesse then accuse the iustice of God and to abstaine from lawfull things then attempt vnlawfull things CHAP. VII That all mankinde is infected with Originall sinne I. SInne is either Originall or Actuall I vse the accustomed words for clearenesse of speech for if one would deale strictly he shou d abstaine from these tearmes seeing it is certaine that Originall sin is in act and therefore is actuall But vse hath obtained that that sinne should be called actuall which is committed in action or in deede and that originall which we haue from the birth that hereditary blot which is sent into vs from our Parents II. Of Originall sinne Saint Paul doth treat in the fifth and seauenth Chapter to the Romanes In the fifth Chapter how it hath passage into all mankinde in the seauenth Chapter how it doth remaine in him in whose minde the law of God is perfectly written III. That no man is free from this blot the Scripture doth cry and experience doth witnesse Whatsoeuer is borne of the flesh is flesh saith Christ Iohn 3. And there he doth plainely teach that all men are defiled with Originall sinne when he saith that it is necessary to be borne againe and to be formed anew We are by nature the children of wrath Eph. 2.3 Who can bring forth a cleane thing out of an vncleaâ—e there is not one Iob 14. Dauid acknowledgeth himselfe infected with this contagion Psal 51. Behold saith he I was formed in iniquity and in sinne my mother conceiued me He doth not acâ—use his father nor expostulate with his mother but although hee was adorned with fingular prerogatiue and replenished with benefits yet hee doth confesse himselfe to be defi ed with that vniuersall contagion he fetcheth the cause of his sinne from that originall and in this common lot he doth lament his owne Circumcision signiâ—ied this for by that externall symbole â—e Church was warned that there was something â—n man 〈◊〉 soone as he was borne that ought to be cut off and â—â—â—râ— ted The end of Baptisme is the same watch 〈◊〉 the Sacrament of our cleansing in the bloud of Christ by which our naturall filthinesse is washed away IV. Not onely the progenie of Ethnicks and Infidels or euill Christians is borne in this Originall sinne but also the off-spring of the godly and faithfull No otherwise then he that was Circumcised begat one that was vncircumcised and as a graine of Wheate well cleansed and receiued in the lap of the earth afterward growing doth bring forth Wheate with chaffe Then was Adam iustified then did hee by his faith cleaue to the promise of his seede that should bruise the serpents head when he begot Cain the heire of his naturall wickednesse and not of his faith or repentance Piety is not hereditary to be deriued to ones heires neither doth holinâ—sse come into vs by nature but by grace not generation but regeneration doth make men holy and good After the same manner that Aristotle lib 2. Phisic doth teach That artificiall formes as the forme of a statue or image are not begotten but onely naturall formes Therefore in the children of the best man as soone as they beginne to speake you may see a crafty and lying disposition and prone to reuenge stubbornenesse against those that admonish them prickes of glory and sporting vanity also that great honour wherewith they prosecute their puppets and babyes are no obscure seedes of their inclinablenesse to Idolatry For as puppets are the Idols of infants so Idols are the puppets of those that are growne in age And therefore when any man hath children of euill manners he ought to acknowledge his image in them when he hath good children he ought to admire the worke of God in them For these are they of whom Saint Iohn saith Chap. 1. who are not borne of bloud nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God V. The second Canon of the Mileuitan counsell is expresly to this thing It pleaseth vs that whosoeuer doth deny little ones that are new borne to be Baptised or doth say that indeede they are Baptised for the remission of their sinnes but yet they drew no originall sinne from Adam which is to be taken away by the lauar of regeneration whence it followeth that the forme of Baptisme in them is to be vnderstood not to be true but false be an Anathema VI. Christ alone was free from this blot he deriued not Originall sinne from his Mother Saint Paul indeede Rom. 5.10 saith that all men sinned in Adam neither is it any doubt but that Christ was in Adam as being one of his posterity but that sentence of the Apostle doth not concerne Christ because the person of Christ was not in Adam but onely his humaine nature neither is he from Adam as from the agent principle and from the seminating power but thence he tooke that matter which by the ouer-shadowing of the holy Ghost was freed from the common contagion VII Now if you should aske me whether Originall sinne is done away by Baptisme or whether that blot doth yet remaine in those that are regenerated by the holy Ghost it is readily answered out of the Scripture and experience which is so certaine here that there is no place left for doubting Dauid was circumcised and plentifully instructed with the gifts of the holy Ghost and yet he doth confesse that he was not free from this staine but was polluted in an equall contagion with others And Saint Paul Rom. 7. speaking vnder his owne person of euery man in whose minde the law of God is faithfully imprinted doth acknowledge that sinne doth dwell in him which he â—aileth the law of sinne because it doth stirre him vp to sinne We see infants dye as soone as they are baptised and death the Apostle being witnesse Rom. 6. is the wages of sinne I demand for what sinne doe those Baptised infants dye is it for actuall sinne but they haue committed none therefore it is for Originall sinne Whence it appeareth that Originall sinne doth remaine after Baptisme wherein sinne is remitted as touching the guilt although it remaine in the act as Saint Austen teacheth at large in his first Booke against Iulian concerning Marriage and concupiscence Cap. 25. and 26. The concupiscence of the flesh saith he is forgiuen in Baptisme not that it should not be at all but that it should not be imputed for sinne VIII
curse What Predestination is The parts of it That Arminius did not vnderstand what the decree of Predestination is and that he hath vtterly taken away Election I SEeing that by one man sinne entred into the world and death by sinne and all men without exception are borne guilty of the curse it is certaine that that no man can be freed from the curse but by the meere grace and fauour of God This grace he hath reuealed to vs in Christ without whom there is no saluation For he put on our nature that by this meanes of his comming betweene and as it were by this knot man might be ioyned with God and hee suffered death that hee might satisfie for our sinnes and so reconciliation being made wee might be restored to the title and degree of the sonnes of God II. This benefit and sauing grace God doth declare to vs by the Gospell wherein that couenant of free grace whereof Christ is the mediator and foundation is propounded III. By this Gospell eternall life is promised to those that beleeue in Christ For as there is no saluation without Christ so without faith Christ cannot be apprehended nor can we come to the saluation appointed onely for the faithfull For as the Apostle saith Heb. 11 Without faith it is vnpossible to please God I call faith not that vaine trust whereby men sleepe in their vices and their consciences are benumbed while they haue a good hope of the mercy of God but a liuely faith which doth worke by charitie Gal. 5.6 which by that very meanes doth increase loue because it driues away feare IV. This faith man hath not of himselfe neither is it a thing of mans free will but the gift of God and the effect of the holy-Ghost who doth draw men by a powerfull calling and doth seale in mens hearts and deepely impresse in their consciences the promises of God propounded in the Gospell V. All men haue not this faith as the Apostie saith 2. Thes 3. for then all men should be conuerted and saued but onely they whom Paul saith are called by the purpose of God Rom. 8.28 and whom God of his meere * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 good pleasure hath chosen to saluation VI. Faith is giuen by the meer good pleasure of God neither is it giuen to the worthy but it doth make them worthy when it is giuen For God doth not find men good but makes them so neither doth he foreknow any good in man but that which hee himselfe shall doe as hereafter shall more fully be taught VII This eternall and therefore immutable decree of God is called Predestination which is a part of the prouidence of God For prouidence is called Predestination when it doth apply it selfe to the saluation or condemnation of the reasonable creature and when it doth dispense and dispose the meanes by which men come to saluation for that these things are gouerned by the diuine will and that God according to his good pleasure doth giue to some that which he doth deny to others cannot be doubted For though the Scripture were here silent yet reason would cry out that it is not likely that God who doth extend his care to all things is negligent in this thing alone which is the chiefest VIII Furthermore although there be a Predestination among the Angels as Saint Paul witnesseth who 1. Tim. 5.21 calleth the Angels Flect Here we are to deale onely with the predestination of men as that which alone belongs to vs. IX Predestination is therefore the decree by which in the worke of our saluation God hath from eternity determined what hee will doe with euery man Or thus Predestination is the decree of God by which of the corrupted masse of mankinde hee hath decreed to saue certaine men by Christ and iustly to punish the rest for their sinnes X. Of this Predestination there are two parts the one is election the other is reprobation whereof the first doth necessarily lay downe the second For as often as some are chosen out of many the rest are necessarily reprobated and of them that are chosen some are preferred before others XI Of election and of the Elect there is often mention in the Scripture Many are called but few are chosen Math. 20.16 God hath chosen vs in Christ before the foundations of the world were laid Ephes 1.4 The purpose of God according to election doth stand not of workes but of him that calleth Rom. 9.11 There is a remnant according to the election of grace Rom. 11.5 False Christs and false Prophets shall arise and shall shew signes and wonders to seduce if it were possible euen the elect Mark 13.22 XII On the other side that some are reprobates the Scripture doth witnesse 1. Pet. 2.8 Which stumble at the word being disobedient whereunto also they were appointed And Iude v. 4. Certaine men are crept in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who were before of old ordained to this condemnation Hitherto belongs that which is said Reuel 20.15 That there is cast into the lake of fire whosoeuer is not sound written in the booke of life Which booke is nothing else but the Catalogue of the Elect determined by the decree of God XIII We haue Iacob and Esau for a notable example of this difference of whom whilest they were yet shut vp in the wombe before they had done either good or euill God doth pronounce I haue loued lacob I haue hated Esau Rom. 9. Also the two Theeues crucified with Christ Two shall be in a bed the one shall be receiued and the other left Luk. 17.34 Not much vnlike that which happened to Pharaohs Butler and his chiefe Baker who being shut vp in the same prison the one was brought forth to honour the other to punishment XIV An example of this difference God hath shewed not onely in Abraham but also in his stocke which for no desert of theirs hee preferred before other Nations When the most high diuided to the Nations their inheritance when he seperated the sonnes of Adam the Londs portion was his people Iacob was the lot of his inheritance Deut. 32. And least any one should suppose that that was done for the vertue of that people fore-seene he thus speaketh to his people Vnderstand therefore that the Lord thy God giueth thee not this good Land to possesse it for thy righteousnesse for thou art a stiffe-necked people Deut. 9.6 XV. And although Predestination doth comprehend reprobation seeing that it is certaine that the wicked are appointed to a certaine end and to their deserued punishments yet the Apostle by the word Predestination doth vnderstand onely Election as Rom. 8. Those that he predestinated he called c. And Ephes 1.5 Hauing predestinated vs to the adoption of children Thomas imitating this manner of speaking doth thus define Predestination 1. Part. Sum. Quest 23. Art 2. Predestination is the preparation to grace in the present and to glory in the world to come XVI But when
decree of God to be precise yet doth confesse that God doth certainely fore-know who are to be damned And to confesse this what is it else then to teach that God is willing that wee should pray for them whom he certainely knoweth our prayers will not profit But that which he casteth vpon vs that we make the decree of reprobation to goe before all things and causes and therefore also before sinne it selfe is plainely contrary to our opinion And if such words haue fallen from any vnawares it is not therfore the opinion of our Churches we defend those things that are ours but we doe not warrant other mens XXVI Concerning the place of the Apostle where hee saith that God would haue all men be saued it shall be spoken in his order and place To will here is no other thing then to inuite and to call Also by all men he vnderstandeth men of euery condition and sort After the same manner that Titus 2.11 The grace of Christ is said to bring saluation to all men when notwithstanding so many perish This is a token here of that in the former place it is spoken of kings in this place of seruants Their domination was at that time contrary to Christ and the lot and state of these men was abiect and base the Apostle would not hinder that they should not be prayed for and these are thought such as may be partakers of sauing grace XXVII The Arminians seeme to themselues to deale very acutely when they dispute thus If there be any one say they whose eyes haue beene pulled out for not keeping his watch well is it a iust thing to command him that hereafter he should watch and ward And then if he hath not done it to lay great punishments vpon him because he hath not watched I answere that this is an example nothing to the purpose For they vse the example of one that is blinde who is not bound to see But man though he be corrupted and wicked yet he is bound to obey God which if hee hath not done he is iustly punished Then also they bring an example of one whose eyes were pulled out hee striuing against it and being vnwilling But man brought this deprauation on himselfe of his owne accord and was voluntarily euill and therefore he is iustly punished CHAP. XXVII How farre and in what sence Christ died for all The opinions of the parties I. THE Arminians are of opinion that Christ by his death obtained got remission of sins Coll. Page 130. Christut omnibus per mortem impetrauit recenciliationem remissionem peccatorum Collat. Hag. P. 183. Non omnibus merito suo partam salutem consert etiamsi omnthussit acquisita reconciliation saluation for all particular men Nor doe they doubt to say that by the death of Christ reconciliation was obtained for Pharaoh Saul Iudas and Pilate not as they were reprobates but as they were sinners For God doth equally intend and desire the saluation of all men and that the incredulity of man is the cause that remission and reconciliation is not applied to all Yet Vorstius alone the champion of the Arminians doth stagger in this question and doth seeme to be more prone to the contrary opinion In the 56. Page Collat. cum Piscat He saith that Christ was deliuered by God to death not for the elect alone but for all men whatsoeuer at least for them that are called III. They thinke that the end which God propounded to himselfe in deliuering his Sonne to death was not to apply this benefit to some certaine men nor doe they thinke that Christ was appointed to death by the precise will of God to saue man for Christ was appointed to death by his father before God thought of sauing of men and therefore that he was appointed to death without that respect that they which beleeue in him should be saued Greuinchouius Page 21. doth say expressely that reconciliation being obtained there was yet no necessity of application that is after saluation and reconciliation for all men was obtained there was no necessity that any one should be saued and it was possible that no man in act should be reconciled Because he will haue the decree of sending Christ in order to goe before the decree of sauing those which beleeue and therefore that God determined to send his Sonne when he had not yet determined to saue those which beleeue But the Arminians would haue this to be the end which God propounded to himselfe in sending his Sonne to wit to make the saluation of men possible and to lay open a way for himselfe whereby hee might saue finners without any hurt to his iustice By this meanes they say God hath gotten power of sauing man because without the death of Christ Greuinch Pag. 15.16.17 by which the iustice of God was satisfied God could not be willing to saue men IV. And if no man had beleeued in Christ yet Christ if these men be beleeued had obtained that end which he propounded to himselfe in dying For they denie that he died to saue any man precifely but that the saluation of man might be made possible and a gate might be opened vnto him to saluation which is left free for man by the helpe of grace to enter or not to enter V. Vide Collat. Hag. p. 172. Greum p. 8.9 Deus applicationem reconnliationes amnibus nec voluit nec noluit c. They distinguish therefore betweene the obtaining of reconciliation and the application of it They contend that reconciliation and remission of sinnes is obtained for all which yet is applied onely to them that beleeue That all men are giuen to Christ in the right of saluation but not in the communication of saluation That God hath neither willed nor nilled the application of reconciliation that is faith and saluation to all men but he hath thus willed it if they beleeue if they will receiue grace VI. Armin in Perkins Page 77. 78. The same men also doe deny that Christ on the crosse sustained the person of the elect or that he died for the elect Because election had not then place for election is something that is after the death of Christ VII They say indeede that Christ offered himselfe for a sacrifice for all men but as concerning his intercession they are not constant to themselues in that * Greuinch P. 46. Christus quoad actum oblationis omnium â—m nino hominam sacerdâ—s suit etiam Pharaonis c Ibâ— per oblationeÌ„ vult fiâ—ri impetration 〈◊〉 per intercessionem â—ere applicationem sometimes they will haue him to make intercession onely for the saithfull as if something might be obtained without intercession Sometimes they make two kindes of intercession * Coll Ha. p. 187. Respondemus dupâ—â—ceÌ„ esse intercessâ—onem vnam generalem quae â—otum mundum spectat alteram particulareÌ„ quae ad solâ—s credemtes pâ—rtiâ—es one generall
and common to all another particular which is onely peculiar to the elect VIII We doe very much differ from this opinion We acknowledge that Christ died for all but we denie that by his death saluation and forgiuenesse of sinne is obtained for all men Or that reconciliation is made for Cain Pharaoh Saul Iudas c. Neither doe wee thinke that remission of sinnes is obtained for any one whose sinnes are not remitted or that saluation was purchased for him whom God from eternity hath decreed to condemne For this were a vaine purchaâ—e We denie that election is after the death of Christ as for many other causes so also because Christ in the very agony of death gaue a notable proofe of election in the theefe whose heart he affected and enlightned his minde after an vnvtterable manner the other theefe being left and neglected And seeing Christ doth euery where say that he died for his sheepe and for those whom his father gaue him he doth sufficiently declare that he died for the elect IX And when we say that Christ died for all we take it thus to wit that the death of Christ is sufficient to saue whosoeuer doe beleeue yea and that it is sufficient to saue all men if all men in the whole world did beleeue in him And that the cause why all men are not saued is not in the insufficiency of the death of Christ but in the wickednesse and incredulity of man Finally Christ may be said to reconcile all men to God by his death after the same manner that we say that the Sunne doth enlighten the eyes of all men although many are blinde many sleepe and many are hid in darkenesse Because if all and seuerall men had their eyes and were awake and were in the middest of the light the light of the Sunne were sufficient to enlighten them Neither is it any doubt but that it may be said not onely that Christ died for all men but also that all men are saued by Christ because among men there is none saued but by Christ After the same manner that the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 15.20 that all men are made aliue by Christ because no man is made aliue but by him CHAP. XXVIII That reconciliation remission of sinnes and saluation is not obtained nor purchased for all and particular men by the death of Christ I. FIrst whosoeuer saith that by the death of Christ reconciliation is obtained for all and singular men although hee consider Pharaoh and Iudas not as reprobates but simply as sinners yet hee saith that reconciliation is obtained for them who haue neuer beleeued nor neuer were to beleeue And seeing it is not equall nor iust that reconciliation should bee obtained for such the death of Christ is vsed wrongfully to obtaine something that is vniust and to doe something which is contrary to the iustice of God II. And who but hee that doth willingly shut his eyes will euer beleeue that the reconciliation of Iudas was obtained by the death of Christ seeing that the death of Christ was the very crime of Iudas and by it he was brought to the halter III. And seeing that at the very time in which Christ did die many were already tormented in hell he must needes be of a shallow braine who thinketh that by the death of Christ saluation or reconciliation was obtained for them IV. Also by this doctrine God is openly mocked For Christ is imagined to obtaine that from his father which he knew would neuer profit as if God should grant to his sonne the saluation of that man which from eternity he decreed to condemne For if Christ obtained reconciliation and remission of sinnes for Pharaoh and Iudas whether considered as Reprobates or considered as sinners hee knew well enough that that obtaining of it would not be for their good or profit Christ therefore is brought in asking this of his father I pray thee receiue into grace those whom I know thou wilt neuer receiue into grace and whom I know certainely are to be condemned For Christ in his death and before his death knew full well the secrets of election Surely these men seeme to doe their endeauour that Christian Religion should be made a laughing stocke V. Also they expose God to derision while they will haue God at the same time to loue and hate the same man to loue him because hee giueth his sonne for him and would haue reconciliation to be obtained for him but to haue hated him because from eternity he decreed to condemne him VI. And if Christ obtained remission of sins for Iudas it must needs be that God granted that to Christ asking it that he forgaue the sins of Iudas Which if it be true it necessarily followeth that God doth abolish his owne acts and condemning Iudas punished those sins which were remitted and so men should be punished for those sins the pardon whereof is obtained the testament of Christ by which they wil haue saluation to be purchased for all men should be made void VII Neither is God onely thus mocked but also he is made to mocke mankinde For it is manifest by vse and by the experience of all ages that the Gospell is scarce preached to euery tenth man and that the name of Christ is vnknowne to the greatest part of the world which thing that it is done by the prouidence of God so dispensing there is none that will deny vnlesse he that thinkes that all things are carried confusedly and that they doe proceede without reason or order And if reconciliation and saluation by Christ be purchased for all men why doth not God publish this benefit through the whole world Why doth he suffer this reconciliation to be vnknowne to the greatest part of mankinde Why doth he keepe in and hide from so many men the grace which doth belong to them and which is obtained for them without the knowledge of which no man can be saued They answere that God doth it because men shew themselues vnworthy of this grace As if any man could be worthy of it or could shew himselfe worthy of it Who knoweth not that the Gospell is preached to them that are most vnworthy And where sinne hath abounded Rom. 5.20 there grace hath abounded And if God is hindred by the vnworthinesse of man that he should not make knowne to him the reconciliation obtained the same vnworthinesse could and ought to hinder the obtaining of reconciliation For when reconciliation was obtained God did then fore-know the vnworthinesse that would follow with no lesse certainty then if it had beene present VIII And when they say that Christ died for all as concerning the obtaining of saluation but not as concerning the application of it they doe plainely confesse that Christ did not obtaine that this reconciliation should be applied to all Whence it commeth to passe that this obtaining of reconciliation is vaine yea and ridiculous For they speake as much as if
they should say that freedome was obtained for one but not that he should be freed or that foode was obtained for one but it was not procured that hee should be fed with this foode IX And seeing that by faith the application of the death of Christ is made if Christ by his death hath not obtained for vs the application of this reconciliation it will follow that he hath not obtained faith for vs For they must needes deny that faith is obtained for vs who will not haue faith to be from grace alone but to be partly from free-will in whose power they will haue it to be to refuse or admit grace to beleeue in act or not to beleeue X. And surely hee that shall more attentiuely consider what these words meane The obtaining of application and the application of the thing obtained will finde that it is a meere Meteor or building of Castles in the ayre and that they are vnseasonable trifles with which they enwrap mens wits seeing Christ doth obtaine nothing which he doth not apply nor doth he apply any thing which he hath not obtained Otherwise in vaine were the obtaining of that benefit which both he that obtaineth it and he of whom it is obtained knoweth that it will neuer be applied and that it will neuer profit him for whom it is obtained Nor is it credible that the remission of that sinne which shall neuer be remitted is procured XI Yea these innouators doe so speake as they that would haue by the death of Christ something to be procured not for vs but for God For they say that by the death of Christ God obtained power of sauing vs but they denie that the application or conferring of saluation was obtained by the death of Christ for Peter or Paul but that onely a gate and way was opened for them by which they might come to saluation Wherefore Christ by his death will be said to be not the giuer but the preparer of saluation And certainly the opinion of Arminius doth tend thither that Christ should be said not to haue obtained reconciliation for any one but to haue laid open a way for God by which he might bestow saluation XII They doe no lesse trifle when they confesse that the fruit of the resurrection of Christ Aduer Walach P. 51. Non ad eos omnes fructus resurrectionis extenditor prâ— quibus mâ—rtem oppetijt Christâ—â— pertained onely to the faithfull but the fruit of his death that is reconciliation and remission of sinnes they extend to all and seuerall men Ther fore if these men be beleeued there will be some mâ—n to whom the fruit of the death of Christ doth pertaine but the fruit of his resurrection doth not pertaine As if they should say that Christ died for some men for whom hee hath not ouercome death And that the fruit of the fight belonged to all but not the fruit of the victory And there will be some men for whom although he hath offered himselfe on earth yet hee doth not offer himselfe in heauen But the Scripture ioyneth these things as inseuerable and vnseperable that hee died for vs and that he rose againe for vs Rom 8.34 It is Christ that died yea rather that is risâ—n againe who is at the right hand of God making intercession for vs. And the 2. Co. 5.14 That they which liue should not henceforth liue vnto themselues but vnto him that died for them and rose againe Because no man is made partaker of the fruite of the death of Christ but by his resurrection XIII It is of no small moment that if reconciliation were obtained for all mankind it must needs be that all infants borne without the couenant are reconciled their sinne is forgiuen them Whence it would come to passe that they could not haue a greater benefit bestowed vpon them then if one in a gentle cruelty should kill them in their cradles For if they die in this state of reconciliation their saluation is certaine but if they liue they shall be brought vp in paganisme which is the most sure way to eternall destruction XIV And seeing no man can be saued but hee for whom reconciliation hath beene obtained and hath also beene applied I doe not see what the obtaining of reconciliation doth differ from the application of it in infants which are taken away by an vntimely death For by the doctrine of Arminius they are saued by reconciliation alone Here therefore that distinction of the obtaining of reconciliation and of applying of it doth vanish away Which distinction although it may haue place among men yet with God it cannot haue place who granteth nothing which he doth not giue from whom nothing is obtained which hee doth not giue and conferre in act For to him all things are fore-seene neyther can any thing happen by which hee should be compelled to deny what hee hath granted to change his counsell or to abolish his acts XV. And if these two things be compared betweene themselues to obtaine reconciliation for his enemies that they might be saued and to bestow saluation on them that are already reconciled it is no doubt but that it is farre greater loue to die to reconcile his enemies then to giue saluation to them that are reconciled The Apostle teacheth thâ—s expresly Rom. 5.10 If when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his sonne much more being reconciled we shall be saued by his life If Saint Paul be beleeued it is an easier and more likely thing to saue him that is reconciled then to reconcile him that is an enemy by dying for him Seeing therefore that Christ if we giue credit to Arminius hath performed for all men that which is farre the greatest and is an argument of his highest loue it will be said that Christ in dying for vs loued Pilate Iudas Saul and Pharaoh no lesse then Peter and Iohn But there is no man can make himselfe beleeue vnlesse it be hee that is willing to be deceiued that Christ loued those with his greatest loue whom his father from eternity hated and whom the sonne himselfe knew were from eternity appointed to punishment XVI Yea truely seeing Christ as hee is one God with the father hath from eternity predestinated the reprobates to damnation it is not likely yea not possible that the same Christ hath obtained reconciliation for Iudas as hee is man and a mediator and hath from eternity reprobated the same man as hee is God For although these sectaries will haue the decree of reprobation to be in order after the obtaining of reconciliation yet neither of them is in time before the other and it must needes be that the desire of reconciling and the decree of reprobating were together in one and the same minde XVII Notable is the speech of Christ Iohn 15.13 Greater loue hath no man then this that one lay downe his life for his friends The meaning of Christ is that friends cannot
the death of Christ are not bound to beleeue that Christ dyed for them which yet are the greatest part of the world Neither are they to whom Christ is preached bound to beleeue absolutely and without condition that Christ died for them but on this condition if they be conuerted For if they shall perseuere in impenitency they are bound to beleeue that the death of Christ doth nothing pertaine to them XV. Arminius pag. 77. against Perkins and his sectaries doe repeate and heape vp these things euen to tediousnesse If there be any for whose sinnes God would not haue satisfaction to be made to himselfe by the death of Christ then in no right can faith be required of them nor can Christ be made their iudge neither can the reprobate be blamed for refusing the grace of redemption because it did not pertaine to him I answere all these things are grounded on this false supposition that faith is required of all men for wee haue already taught that it is not required of them who neuer had any meanes to know Christ as also that they to whom Christ is preached are not bound absolutely and without condition to beleeue that they are redeemed by the death of Christ but on this condition that they be conuerted They to whom the Gospell hath not beene preached shall not be condemned for the reiection of the Gospell but for the breach of the Law of which iudgement Christ by his father is appointed to be the Iudge who doth leaue vnder the Law those whom he doth not saue by the Gospell But they who by their incredulity haue refused the grace offred them by the Gospell are iustly condemned for refusing that grace not because they haue reiected that which pertaineth to vnbeleeuers and impenitent persons but because hauing despised the condition they haue neglected that which was offered to them vnder the condition of beleeuing which condition although they cannot fulfill by their naturall powers yet it is their debt for man himselfe by his owne fault brought vpon himselfe the disabilitie of beleeuing which disability God is not bound to cure in all Of which thing it is largely spoken Chap. 11. But say they Reprobates cannot be blamed for despising that grace which doth not belong vnto them But they are quite out of the way For reprobates cannot be accused for despising grace if they did despise it because they knew it did not belong vnto them But they therefore reiect it because they loue not Christ and they are led to the contempt of it by their owne will For Reprobates doe not therefore beleeue because saluation doth not belong vnto them but rather saluation doth not belong vnto them because they doe not beleeue and they draw destruction to themselues by their owne incredulity and impenitency It is true indeede that reprobation is the cause why God will not giue faith and repentance to this or that man But it is not the cause which doth put in and breâ—de impenitency and incredulity in man Wherefore that speech of Christ Iohn 10.16 Yee beleeue not because ye are not of my sheepe is so to be taken as if hee had said Therefore God doth not giue you faith which is peculiar to the elect because yee are not elected XVI This is the obiection of Greuinchouius P. 19. If election be before the obtayning of saluation then God first decreed of the communicating of saluation before he decreed of the obtaining of it But I am so far from thinking this to be absurd that I beleeue it is plainely necessary For it is alwaies first thought of the end before of the meanes to the end The saluation of man was the end God propounded to himselfe that this was the end is hence manifest because this is last in execution Therefore God first thought of giuing saluation before he thought of the obtayning of saluation by Christ because this is the meanes by which he doth leade vs to saluation XVII The same man Page 87. doth thus dispute They to whom this price being fit to saue them is offered if they themselues will embrace it for them also it is payed by the purpose of God But it is offered to Reprobates on this condition if they will embrace it therefore it is payed also for them by the purpose of God I answere that the minor part is not vniuersally true for this price is not offered for all the Reprobates and the maior part doth offend against the rules of precognition or supposition which will haue the subiect of euery Axiome or sentence to be or to haue being For examples sake this sentence Whosoeuer fulfilleth the law is saued is not false But the falshood of it is in the presupposition whereby it is presupposed That some men fulfill the Law The Maior of this Sylogisme hath the same fault For the subiect of it is imaginary and not existent For the subiect is this They to whom this price is offered to embrace it if they will I deny that there are such men to be found For this price is not offered to the Reprobates if they will embrace it seeing it is most certaine that they will not and that they cannot will of which disabilitie man himselfe is the cause Neither is this price offered to the Elect if they will but God in offering that price doth worke in them that they should will XVIII And when they speake of the sufficiency of the death of Christ as they extoll the efficacy of it so they say that it is sufficient not onely for men but also for the diuells Which if it be true it must needes be that God doth take away and cut off something from the price of the death of his Sonne and doth shorten the efficacy of it But although I know that the price and dignity of the death of Christ doth not depend on his humane nature but on the infinite excellency of his diuine nature yet I denie that his death is fit for the redemption of diuels because the iustice of God requireth that man who sinned should beare the punishment and it was needfull that the mediator betweene God and man should haue reference to both in the communion of his nature Therefore to saue man he tooke not the Angels but the seede of Abraham Heb. 2. And if the death of a man is sit to satisfie for the sinnes of Angels then the torments of an Angell if Christ had taken the nature of Angells had beene fit to satisfie for the sinnes of man Finally when it is spoken of the fitnesse is not to be disputed of the sufficiency For otherwise it might also be disputed whether the death of Christ be sufficient to saue Horses or Beetles and to giue them immortality which surely is not without impietie XIX These in a manner are the arguments wherwith these innouators do defend themselus But they doe exagitate and wrong our opinion after their owne manner which is euill for they change it
moued to gine a greater measure of grace But it is so farre that God in beginning regeneration should haue respect to fore-going dispositions that on the contrary they are called who are the greatest strangers from the kingdome of heauen and who are ouer whelmed in greatest darknesse Let the Thiefe on the crosse be an example also the Romanes the people of Alexandria of Antioch the Corinthians and the Ephesians then which people there were neuer any more wicked in lust nor more effeminate in luxurie of greater ignorance or of more prodigious idolatry whom yet so euill affected and dispoled God called by an effectuall calling and hauing sent his Apostles to them gained them to Christ that where sinne did more abound there grace also might more abound XVII And that regeneration is not alwayes wrought by degrees the example of the conuerted Thiefe doth shew who in the extreame inuasion of spirituall agony in one moment passed ouer an vnmeasurable space and oâ— the contrary that the resurrection of the body may be done by degrees Ezechiel teacheth Chap. 37. XVIII That is no truer which they say that regeneration is wrought free-will remayning For if free-will doth remaine in regeneration it must needes be that it goeth before regeneration but in things that are spirituall and which belong to saluation there was no free-will before regeneration XIX It is of the same sort yea farre worse which they adde that in an vnregenerate man there are some reliques of the spirituall life for so they aske that to be granted to them which is the question and which we haue already proued to be false XX. Neither yet is that true which they say that God doth not speake to a dead corps for Christ spake these words to Lazarus that was dead Lazarus come forth Luk. 11. And Eze. 37.4 God doth thus speake to the bones that were long before withered Oye dry bones heare the word of the Lord. God calleth those who are not as if they were but in that he calleth them he causeth that they may be The words of Christ Iohn 5.25 are direct to this purpose The dead shall heare the voice of the sonne of God and they that heare shall liue For as God with his light doth so enlighten the blinde that he also giueth them eyes so by his word he doth so speake to the dead that by that word he doth make them aliue XXI Maruailous is the wittinesse of the Arminian conferrers at the Hage who doe thence proue that there is some ability left in man that is spiritually dead because we acknowledge that man may resist grace Passing well spoken for they proue that a man is not dead in sinne because he can resist the spirit of God as if the remainds of our spirituall life were placed in the faculty of resisting God when on the contrary a man is therefore dead in sinne because he can doe nothing but resist They doe therefore as much as if they should say that a man is not therefore dead in sinne because he is dead in sinne XXII And that which they say that he which is dead cannot resist his resurrection but hee that is vnregenerated may resist his viuification maketh for vs and doth burden the cause of these innouators For thence it followeth that the death in sinne is farre the worse death and that he that is dead in sinne is bound with stronger bonds if he resist his owne resurrection not onely in the beginnings of his regeneration but also in the progresse of it Yea that very inclination to resist God is the chiefest part of that death and naturall corruption XXIII In the meane while the Reader shall obserue how artificiall a couert Arnoldus doth vse while he saith that he which is dead cannot resist his resurrection but he that is dead in sinne may resist his viuification The opinion of the Arminians is that an vnregenerate man hath free-will by which he may vse sufficient grace or not vse it beleeue or not beleeue Arnoldus therefore ought thus to haue framed his comparison saying he that is dead cannot hinder or further his owne resurrection but hee that is vnregenerate may hinder or further his regeneration But Arnoldus doth not here make mention of that helpe that he might put by the enuie and suspâ—tion of Semipelagianisme Thus they are wont to doe that are ashamed of their owne opinion XXIV That is not to be passed ouer with silence which the Arminians of the conference at the Hage pag. 81. doe say For there they make two kindes of vnregenerate men some who being left without any calling of God doe walke in the vanity of their minde and thoughts These they confesse are dead in sinne but there are some who are already called and stirred vp by the grace of God whose vnderstandings being enlightned and their affections being enflamed doe stirre vp the will to the apprehension of the truth They deny that those are dead in sinne because their vnderstandings and appetites are viuified although the will is not yet drawne here are many absurdities First because they thinke that some are vnregenerate who are already viuified and made aliue when yet viuification and regeneration are the same thing For if ones minde be quickned it must needes also be regenerated Secondly With the like error they place viuification there where there is not faith seeing as the Apostle witnesseth the iust doth liue by faith and it is impious to acknowledge any viuification to be in an infidell and vnregenerate man Thirdly And they dispute vntowardly when they iudge it to be possible the vnderstanding being enlightned with the knowledge of the truth and the appetite enflamed with the loue of it that the will should be auerse from this truth And that a man may be quickned in his minde and affections and yet his will remaines without life For what should turne away the will when they two doe instigate and stirre it vp seeing that the will is moued by these two alone Nor doth the will euer stand in doubt but when reason stirreth it vp one way and the appetites draw it another way and the will is forced hither and thither by the contrary suggestions of the minde and the appetites Fourthly Nor doe they agree to themselues when they say that there are some left without any calling of God seeing that they maintaine with great contention that all men are called to saluation not onely by an outward but also by an inward calling and that sufficient grace is administred to all Fiftly Finally I demand whence they haue these two kindes of vnregenerate persons If out of the Scripture let them shew the place If out of their owne coniecture wee doe not beleeue them XXV Arnoldus against Tilenus Page 134. doth say that it may come to passe that of two men furnished with an equall helpe of grace one may be conuerted one not But he ought also to shew whether it may come to passe
Scripture that cannot lye saith that euery man is a lyar The same Law commandeth that God be loued withall our heart and all our strength which thing how can it be performed by the vnregenerate seeing it was neuer peeformed by the regenerate themselues That which a liuing man neuer performed how can it be performed by him that is dead Finally we must bid Christian religion farewell and another Gospell must be coyned if this prodigious doctrine be admitted IX But that we may come to that double spirit of God Arminius and according to him Arnoldus pag. 399. doe deuise two spirits or rather two acts of the same spirit The one of these spirits they will haue to be common to all men euen to the vnregenerate yea and to heathen men to whom the Gospell hath not come by which spirit they thinke that God doth worke in all men and is idle in none This is that spirit which they call the spirit of bondage of which it is spoken Rom. 8.15 which is opposed in that place to the spirit of Adoption which is peculiar to the true faithfull This spirit of bondage the Arminiaâ—s will haue to be effectuall in the law not onely in the written law but also in that which is naturally imprinted in mens hearts By this spirit they thinke that vnregenerate men doe tremble with a sauing feare doe acknowledge and confesse their sinnes doe implore the grace of God and apply themselues to the obedience of the law of nature these they thinke are preparation and dispositions to regeneration if so be that free-will doth vse well that vniuersall and sufficient grace which is common to all men These are the decrees of this new sect full of many perplexities and filled with nice and slender points X. I finde in the holy Scripture the spirit of adoption the first fruits of the spirit the spirit of sanctification but I no where finde a spirit of God that is tyed to the law and common to all men Nor can the spirit of God working in our hearts be without very great wickednesse seperated from the knowledge of Christ 2 Cor. 3.6 Ministers of the new Testament not of the Letter but of the Spirit for the letter killeth but the spirit giueth life Nor doe I see how there can be in them whom Saint Paul Ephes 2. saith to be dead in sinne strangers from the life of God and without God in the world either any spirituall life or the spirit of God dwelling in their hearts and sauingly mouing and affecting them Certainely the Apostle had neuer called the Law seperated from the Gospell a killing letter nor had opposed it to the spirit if the spirit of God were alway ioyned to the law or if the spirit of God did worke in mens hearts and dispose them to faith and conuersion without the knowledge of the Gospell Nor is the Law a Schoole-master vnto Christ vntill the grace of Christ is offred to vs for then the Law with terrour and threats doth compell vs to imbrace the grace offred XI But that is most dangerous which the Arminians presse downe and hide but dare not vtter to wit that the holy spirit is naturally in euery man For if the spirit of God be effectuall in the law and the law be naturally engrauen in euery man it must needes be that the spirit of God is naturally in euery man And so whatsoeuer the Scripture speaketh of the second birth by the spirit of the creation of the new man and of the spirituall resurrection will fall to the ground yea will be ridiculous For what neede were there to infuse a new spirit for regeneration if the same spirit of God did already dwell in the hearts of the vnregenerate XII And that place of Saint Paul Rom. 8. Ye haue not receiued the spirit of bondage againe to feare they doe falsely and against the Apostles will draw to this matter For Saint Paul neuer called the spirit of God the spirit of bondage for so he had reproached the spirit of God but he onely saith that the spirit that was giuen to them was not seruile and such as should strike their hearts with a slauish feare For where the spirit of God is there is liberty 2 Cor. 3. If I should say that we haue not receiued from God the spirit of lying should I therefore say that there is a spirit of God that compels to lying Is the spirit of God contrary to it selfe that one spirit of God should be called the spirit of bondage and another the spirit of liberty The plaine and simple meaning therefore of the words of the Apostle is this Ye haue receiued the spirit of God not that which should terrifie your consciences with a slauish feare which made you vncertaine and doubtfull before the grace of God and the adoption of Christ was reueiled to you c. XIII And they doe extreamely dote when they put the feare and terrour wherewith the law destitute of the spirit of regeneration and the knowledge of Christ doth strike mens hearts among the effects of the spirit of God For the law thus receiued can onely restraine the raging affections with the feare of punishment and frame a man to certaine outward obedience but it will neuer purge the inward filthinesse or instill any one drop of true repentance yea rather it will stirre vp the inward lusts by the resistance of it as it is engrafted in euery man to encline to that which is forbidden and wheresoeuer hope of impunity is propounded men hauing broken their barres doe so much the more outragiously riot by how much they were straightly bridled in This is that which the Apostle would expresse Rom. 7.5.8 The motions of sinnes by the law did worke in our members and sinne taking occasion by the commandement it selfe wrought concupiscence And that vntill the spirit of life which in Christ frees vs from the law of sinne and death as it is said Chapter 8.2 that is vntill the powerfull efficacy of that quickning which we haue from Christ free vs from that bondage of deadly sinne XIV It is vaine and idle which they obiect that the corruption of an vnregenerate man is compared to sleepe and to an Vlcer I confesse it is compared to a sleepe but to a deadly one and such a one out of which man cannot awaken and raise himselfe That Vlcer and scarre which is spoken of Esay 53.1 and 1 Pet. 2. doth not signifie sinne it selfe but the punishment of sin This therefore is nothing to the reliques and remainds of spirituall life in an vnregenerate man CHAP. XXXV The Obiections which the Arminians borrow from the Pelagians and Papists are answered Whether an vnregenerate man doth necessarily sinne and whether necessitie excuseth the sinner Also whether God doth command those things which cannot be performed by man I. THese thornes and difficulties being taken away wee are to come to the Arguments or rather Declamations with which they
curse neither can any one know this except he be instructed by the word seeing I say it is thus whatsoeuer the Arminians doe tattle of vniuersall and sufficient grace doth fall to the ground seeing that by it a man cannot attaine to that which is the beginning and first element of conuersion and that from which grace doth necessarily begin certainely hee that shall turne ouer the writings of the heathen shall finde nothing of the death in sinne nothing of the viuification and regeneration nothing of the necessity of supernaturall grace The best of the heathens set this as the Cynosure and starre by which they would direct the course of their life viz. to follow nature when on the contrary this is the office and worke of the grace of God viz. to restore and change nature X. But in setting downe the time wherein this sufficient grace is at the first giuen to euery man by God they doe not explaine themselues For if all men haue this grace from the wombe then it is not rightly distinguished from nature seeing that that is natural which is ingrafted in euery man from his birth and natiuity But if this grace be giuen onely to them that are growne in yeares in what yeare of their age is it giuen Is it giuen to all at a certaine and equall age or is it giuen to some sooner and some later And if it be giuen in the tenth or twelfth yeare of the life what shall be done with those who dye in the seauenth or ninth yeare what shall be done with them whom death doth take away a day or two before that grace is bestowed Also if one dye presently after that sufficient grace is giuen before hee hath time of well vsing this grace what shall become of this man Being excluded from the right vsing of grace by the shortnes of the time shall he be excluded therefore from the kingdome of heauen Surely while they tye God to lawes they doe entangle themselues in bonds which cannot be shaken off XI And when the Arminians say that sufficient grace which is common to all men euen to vnregenerate men and in fidels is supernaturall it is a hard thing that he who is at the first touched with this supernaturall and helpefull motion should not feele it Or if the beginnings of it are doubtfull and vncertaine at the lest it must needes be felt in progresse of time But neuer any of the heathen hath professed that he hath euer felt this grace nor is there any mention of it in their wrightings XII Also it would be worth the labour to know by what degrees the heathen man dwelling in the south countrie or in the inmost part of Tartaria well vsing naturall instructions may at length come to faith in Christ For these Sectaries must needes faigne many things here and wantonly play with bold coniectures and with vnconstant rashnesse For they must faigne that eyther Oracles were poured on that man from heauen or that Angels were sent to him or some Prophet lifted vp by the hayre hath beene carried thither from some other place that he might instruct that man in the Christian faith For where the Scripture is wanting audacity must needes supply the place of the Scripture XIII Finally what is to be thought of this sufficient grace may hence be iudged in that the Arminians themselues are not constant to themselues and they doe so build it vp that they pull it downe For they which say and doe maintaine with great force that God doth giue sufficient grace to all men doe afterward say that God is ready and prepared to giue it to all as if he indeede were willing to giue it to all but it was hindred by man that it was not done Also the same men teach that no man is conuerted without speciall grace by which speech they confesse that generall grace is not sufficient Finally when they diuide that grace into grace which is sufficient mediately and grace which is sufficient immediately they doe confesse that some grace is sufficient mediately which is vnsufficient immediately and they make many degrees of sufficient grace which degrees how many and what they are none of them hath explained CHAP. XLI The Arguments whereby the Arminians doe maintaine vniuersall sufficient Grace are refuted I. THE arguments of the Arminians for Vniuersall Sufficient and Helpfull Grace are almost the same with them which they are wont to bring for the liberty of free-will in an vnregenerate man which seeing they are aboundantly confuted Chapter 34. there will be no great labour in examining some few which they most frequently vse to proue sufficient grace common to all men They maintaine it by that place of the Apostle Rom. 1.19 where Saint Paul doth thus speake of the Gentiles That which may be knowne of God is manifest in them for God hath shewed it vnto them Surely here is no mention of sufficient grace which the Arminians think to be supernaturall For here the Apostle speaketh of the light of nature and of any sort of the knowledge of God by the creatures which may be had without supernaturall grace by which the Apostle doth not say that man hath power of beleeuing in Christ or that he can dispose or prepare himselfe to regeneration but he onely saith that the power and that the deity of God was seene of them by the creation that they might be inexcusable And they are inexcusable not because they haue abused that grace which was mediately or immediately sufficient to saluation but because they haue not vsed the light of nature as farre as they might and haue endeauoured to choake that light engrafted in them II. They pretend the words of the same Apostle Chapter 2.14 The Gentiles which haue not the law doe by nature the things contained in the law But neither can this place be drawne to stablish sufficient grace which these Sectaries will haue to be supernaturall For it speaketh onely of naturall impressions of equity and goodnesse and of outward actions that are ciuilly honest which are done by the guidance of nature for Saint Paul doth here make no mention of grace Furthermore those things contained in the law may be done by him who doth violate and breake the law for in the externall worke he may doe the things commanded by the law and yet not doe them after that manner and to that end which the law doth require that is with faith and to the glory of God III. That which they obiect out of the foureteenth Chapter of the Acts Vers 17. is nothing to the matter where Saint Paul doth thus speake of the heathen people Neuerthelesse he left not himselfe without witnesse They doe falsely thinke that this witnesse was some sufficient sauing and supernaturall grace and the law naturally engrauen in their hearts which should be a Schoole-master to Christ For the Apostle in the following words doth explaine what manner of testimony this is saying that God gaue
it is not therefore ouerthrowne Our nature is necessarily determined and directed to the desiring of felicity and yet it is not therefore destroyed The will of the Israelites whose hearts God touched that they should cleaue vnto Saul 1 Sam. 10.26 The will of Esau yeelding with a suddaine change to the embracing of his brother Gen. 33. The will of the Thiefe crucified with Christ and of Paul in the very point of conuersion were determined limited to one thing and yet force was not therefore offered to their free-will or their nature destroyed The vehemency of him that is thirstie mouing him to the drinke that is offered is determined and limited to that one thing and yet he doth not therefore cease to be a man nor is his nature therefore ouerthrowne God hath some secret and vnperceiueable meanes by which he can bow mans will the liberty thereof being vntouched An addition to the thirteenth Chapter containing some places that are taken out of the confession of the Churches of France and out of the chiefest Doctors of this age concerning the obiect of Predestination THe twefth Article of the confession of the Church of France is this We beleeue that God out of that corruption and generall curse into which all men were plunged doth free those whom in his eternall and immutable counsell he elected of his meere goodnesse and mercy in our Lord Iesus Christ without the consideration of workes leauing the rest in the same corruption and damnation to shew forth in these his iustice and in them the riches of his mercy For none of them are better then others before God hath separated them c. Iohn Caluin in his Comentary vpon the ninth Chapter of the Epistle to the Romanes speaking of Iacob and Esau in the wombe hath these words God in the defiled nature of man such as was in man could consider nothing whereby be might be induced to doe good to it when therefore he saith that both of them had done neither good nor euill that also is to be added which he doth presuppose to wit that they were both the sonnes of Adam by nature sinners indued not with a mite of righteousnesse Esau was iustly reiected because he was naturally the childe of wrath yet least any scruple should remaine as if his condition had beene the worse for the beholding of any sinne or vice it was expedient that his sinnes should be no lesse excluded then his vertues It is true indeede that the neare cause of reprobation is because we are all cursed in Adam The same Caluin in his Booke of the eternall predestination of God in the beginning of the Epistle which is set before the booke The free Election of God saith he is whereby he adopted to himselfe out of mankinde lost and condemned those whom it seemed good to him Pag. 955. He doth allow the opinion of Saint Austin speaking thus They that are not to perseuere are not seperated by the Predestination and fore-knowledge of God from that masse of perdition and destruction and therefore are not called according to his purpose Pag. 691. I would know if Esay and Iacob should haue beene left to their common nature what good workes God should haue found in Iacob more then in Esau Surely they both by the hardnesse of their stony heart would haue alike refused saluation offered In the same place When Paul tooke that for granted which is incredible to these good Diuines that all men are equally vnworthy that alike corruption of nature is in all men hee thence safely determined that God doth by his free purpose elect whomsoeuer he electeth In the same place that of Austin is most true That those that are redeemed are seperated from those that perish onely by grace whom the common Masse deriued from the same originall had ioyned together to destruction Pag. 965. He doth witnesse that God prepared the vessels of mercy for his glory if this be speciall to the elect it is manifest that the rest are sitted to destruction because being left to their nature they are certainely deuoted to destruction Pag. 970. The Readers are to be admonished that both these are equally condemned by Pighius viz. That God from the beginning when yet the state of man was intire decreed what afterwards should come to passe and that now hee chose out of the perished Masse whom he would He mocketh Austin and all that are like him that is all the godly who doe thinke that God after he fore-knew the vniuersall ruine of mankinde in the person of Adam appointed some to life and some to destruction The same man in his Institutions Lib. 3. Chap. 22. Sect. 1. When Paul teacheth that we were elected in Christ before the creation of the world certainly he doth take away all respect of our owne worth for it is as much as if he should say Because our heauenly father found nothing worthy of Election in the whole seede of Adam he turned his eyes vpon Christ that as it were out of his body he might choose members whom he would after take into the fellowship of life Therefore let this reason preuaile with the faithfull that therefore God adopted vs in Christ to his heauenly inheritance because in our selues we were not capable of this excellency And Section 7. If any one aske from whence God elected he in another place answereth out of the world which he excludeth from his prayers when he doth commend his Disciples to his Father And Chap. 23. Sect. 3. If any one should set vpon vs with these words Why God from the beginning predestinated some men to death who when they were not could not deserue the iudgement of death Instead of an answer we may againe aske them What they thinke God is indebted to man if he will esteeme him according to his owne nature As we are all defiled with sinne we cannot but be odious to God and that not in a tyrannicall cruelty but in the most equall respect of iustice And if all they whom God doth predestinate to death are by a naturall condition obnoxious and subiect to the iudgement of death of what iniustice I pray you of his towards them can they complaine Let all the sonnes of Adam come let them contend and dispute with their Creatour because by his eternall prouidence they were appointed to perpetuall calamity before their generation What could they speake against this defence when as God shall on the contrary side call them to the knowledge of themselues If all are taken out of the corrupted Masse it is no meruaile if they lye vnder damnation Hieronymius Zanchius Miscellan Lib 3. In his Treatise of the Saints at the end of the first Chapter hath these words Generall Predestination that is the predestination of all men is the eternall most wise and immutable decree of God by which he determined with himselfe from eternity first to create all men iust and wise according to his image and likenesse and
to permit that they being tempted by Sathan should of their owne free-will fall into sinne and should fall into the pit of eternall death as the most iust stipend of their sinne Secondly of his grace by Christ to free some of them out of the pit of sinne and death by certaine meanes and to accompany them with his spirit whom he freed and at length to giue them eternall life and to others he decreed not to vouchsafe this grace but rather to blinde them and harden them with Sathan and to destroy them with eternall destruction c. The same man in the same place The speciall predestination of the elect is the eternall most wise and immutable decree of God whereby he determined with himselfe from eternity according to the good pleasure of his will freely to deliuer by Christ some certaine and set men fallen with all the rest into the deepe pit of sinne and death The same man lib. 5. de Natura Dei cap. 2. quest 4. By ascending after this order from the effects to the causes and by descending from the causes to the effects Election and Reprobation may and ought to be considered by vs to wit that God from eternity determined by a firme decree first to create all men then to suffer them to fall into sinne and for sinne to be obnoxious to eternall death Lastly to free by that meanes which he hath freed some men by Christ and to giue them eternall life but to reiect the rest from this grace and being left in their sinnes at length to punish them eternally for their sinnes Bucer vpon the ninth Chapter to the Romanes They that will plainly and simply follow Gods word may easily free themselues from these things for they stick fast to this that God doth witnesse of himselfe viz. that he out of mankinde destroyed by their first father chose some men to be framed by him to a new and blessed life and he accounted the rest the vessels of his wrath Philip Melanchton in his Theologicall Common places loco de Praedestin doth repeate these words more then once It is certaine that this is the cause of Reprobation to wit sinne in man Vuolfangus Musculus loco de Elect. Chap. 5. It is manifest that our election is not made for any respect of our quality It must needes be therefore that we seeke the respect of our election in God electing For the sence of our owne basenesse and deprauation doth driue vs thither Dauid said What is man that thou art mindfull of him and the son of man that thou didst predestinate him when thou didst fore-know that he would be euill and depraued Dauid Paraeus in his commentary on the ninth chapter to the Romanes Page eight hundred and sixeteene will haue Iacob and Esau to be considered as sinners by God electing The cause saith he was the eternall purpose of God whereby he determined to make such difference of them Esau was wicked and Iacob was no lesse wicked for they were both conceiued in sinne and yet God loued the one and hated the other not for any inherent or fore-seene difference but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to election whereby he elected one but not the other The same man page 819. The pleasure or will of God calling is his purpose according to election in Christ that is the purpose of God whereby out of the perished masse he seperated some from others by choosing these and leauing the rest which purpose is called Predestination containing vnder it Election and Abiection The Pastors of the Walachrian Churches in their Epistle doe with one consent thus define Predestination This is the opinion of them who cleaue to the old and receiued confession of our Churches That God from eternity according to the immutable good pleasure of his will decreed to saue some men whom by his meere bounty in Christ Iesus he seuered out of corrupted mankinde c. Iohn Piscator a most rigorous maintainer of Predestination out of the entire and vncorrupted Masse and of reprobation without the beholding of sinne hath very lately set forth a treatise digested into ten Aphorismes the second whereof is conceiued in these words This Predestination hath two species or kindes the one whereof is called Election the other Reprobation by a Metonimy of the effect For election and reprobation are properly referred to mankinde already made and fallen but Metonimically the decree it selfe of Electing or Reprobating is so named The learned man doth at length see that it must needes be that in election and reprobation man be considered as already fallen and in the corrupted Masse But he hath deuised another higher decree whereby God doth neither elect nor reprobate but doth only decree to elect and reprobate Of which decree there is no mention made in the Scripture Finally the Synode of Dordt in the seuenth Canon doth thus define election Election is the vnchangeable purpose of God by which before the foundation of the world according to the free good pleasure of his will of his meere grace he hath chosen out of all mankinde to saluation in Christ a certaine and set number of men neither better nor more worthy then others but lying in the common misery with others and fallen from originall righteousnesse into sinne and destruction by their owne fault c. The same Fathers in the 15. Canon of Reprobation doe thus speake The holy Scripture doth manifest and commend vnto vs this eternall and free grace especially when it doth further witnesse that not all men are elected but that some are not elected or are passed by in the eternall election of God To wit those whom God according to his free iust vnreprouable and immutable good pleasure decreed to leaue in the common misery into which they had cast themselues by their owne fault and not to giue to them sauing faith and the grace of conuersion c. FINIS