why hast thou forsaken me and therefore the Prophet Isay foretelling his passion mentioneth his soule which was made an offering for sin in a word not onely his bloud and body and soule but his whole person is to be included the passion being expiatory as you shall hear more fully anon in that it was the passion of such a person and therefore it is often said he gave up himselfe and more appositely to our present purpose is that of the Auther to the Hebrews by himselfe he purged our sins 2. For the Resolution of the 2. question be pleased to take notice 1. That the cleansing of our sins is attributed in scripture to God to Christ to faith and all of them have a reall and severall influence upon this benefit the principall efficient of this cleansing is God to whom therefore it is attributed in the 9 verse the instrument receiving the benefit is faith and therefore it is said to be through faith the meritorious cause deserving this benefit at the hands of God for us is Christs bloud indeed Socinus asserts with a nihil verius that God and Christ act in the same way of efficiency onely with this difference God is the principall and Christ the organicall cause and so God forgiveth by Christ but whilst he onely asserts but doth not prove it we may as confidently deny as he affirmeth especially when the scriptures expresse that not per but propter Christum by but for Christ we are forgiven so our translators render the sence of St Paules 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for Christ sake and our Apostle in the twelfth verse of the next chapter saith our sins are forgiven 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for his name sake 2. More particularly Christs bloud is the meritorious cause of cleansing us from sin inasmuch as he thereby took our sins upon himselfe This is the truth which the Apostle Peter manifestly asserts where he saith he bore our sins on his own body on the tree and presently addeth by whose stripes we are healed Healing cleansing are paralel phrases our sins being the diseases of our souls of these sicknesses we are healed of these sins we are cleansed by Christs bearâ—ng them on his body which because it was done on high upon the tree the Apostle useth not barely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifyeth sursum tulit not onely he bore but he carryed up whereby the sence is not diminished but augmented as having in it a fit allusion to the sacrifices which were lift up upon the Altar It is very considerable in this respect that the hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like the latine tollo signifie both ferre and auferre to bear and to take away and both these are used concerning Christ in this particular the one by the prophet Isay where he saith he bore our griefes the other by Iohn Baptist when he saith he taketh away the sins of the world and most aptly because he taketh away the sinne from us by taking it upon himselfe To unbowel this precious truth know 1. That Christ bleeding and dying on the Crosse stood in our stead and suffered in our room to this purpose are those expressions where Christ is said to suffer for us to die for the people for so much the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometimes signifieth as when St. Paul wisheth to be an anathema 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for or instead of his brethren and when the Apostles are said to be Ambassadors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that is in Christs stead more clearly to this intent is that phrase of the Evangelist where Christ is said to give his life a ransom for many the preposition being not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which alwayes implyeth a commutation and when it is applyed to persons signifieth the comming of one into the room of another so Archelaus is said to raign in Judea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the rooom of his father Herod Yea that this sence is intended where spoken of Christs sufferings appeares by St. Pauls question is Paul crucified for you for if it were onely meant for your good Paul might have been crucified for them as he tells the Colossians I rejoyce in my sufferings for you and therefore crucified for you must be as much as in your stead which neither Paul nor any other could be 2. That Christ standing in our stead death was inflicted on him by God for our sins this no doubt is the genuine meaning of those Scriptures where he is said to be wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities and again he was delivered for our offences he died for our sins That these phrases cannot properly note the final cause appeareth in that the end of his death is not our sins but what is directly contrary to our sins the destruction of them who ever said that Physick was taken for death that is the avoyding death but for the disease the disease being that which necessitateth to Physick besides to instance yet nearer when we say a man died for theft for murder or treason what else do we mean but that those crimes were the deserving cause which brought him to his end Thus Christ died for our sins our sins bringing him to his Cross to his grave in this sense no doubt it is that the Apostle saith he that is God made him to be sin for us to wit at least so farre as to be made a sacrifice for our sins when yet he sin-namely in himself and look as the beast in the law was slain and sacrificed in the room and for the sin of the person that brought it so was Christ crucified in our stead because of our sin 3. That Christ bleeding and dying for our sins suffered that punishment which was due to us It was the commination of God to Adam Thou shalt dye the death Death then was the punishment due to him and all his posterity for sin and this death which we must have undergone in our own persons is inflicted upon Christ. To this purpose it is that Christ is said by the Apostle to be made a curse when this but when he hung upon the tree for cursed is every one that hangeth upon the tree so that the curse which the law pronounceth against uâ— was laid on him if it be said that the curse and death which was due to us was eternal whereas Christs was temporary I answer that duration is but a circumstance to the thing and the reason why on us it must have been eternal is because our punishment could no other way be infinite which yet is required for the satisfaction of an infinite offended justice whereas the case is farre different in respect of Christ as will appear presently 4. That Christ having suffered
he gave him sicut promissus sic missus he was not more mercifully promised than faithfully sent It did not seem good to his wisdome to confer this jewel presently but in the mean space that the Church might have somewhat to support her he vouchsafed the promise of it divine promises are as sweet bits to stay our stomachs before the full meal of his actual performances the promise of Christs first coming was that which comforted the Iewes and the promise of his second coming is that which now reviveth the Christian Church and since we have found him making good his word in the one we may assure our selves he will fulfill it in the other since as he was so good as to give a word so he will be so good as his word and give the thing whatsoever it is that he is pleased to promise for so it was in that singular eminent promise of Christ who is therefore not unfitly called the word and so much for that 2. The other substantive yet remaineth to wit life which is in the place of an adjective and may be rendred as an Epithete the living word and look as Christ when he is compared to bread to a stone it is with this addition the bread of life a living stone to difference him from other stones from common bread so he is here called the word of life to distinguish him from and advance him above other words for whereas other words though spoken by living persons yet have no life in themselves this word is the living word personally subsisting or else as he is called the bread of life because he giveth and communicateth life to them that feed on him so here the word of life because he is the author of life to them that receive him but the discussion of this falleth more fitly in in the next part to which therefore I pass on namely The particular exemplification in which Christ is characterized as God-man as God as man as God-man he is stiled the life and the eternal life as God he is said to be the life which was with the Father as man he is the life which was manifested Of each of which with all possible brevity and perspicuity He is called the life that eternal life If you ask in what respect this agreeth to him the answer is already hinted but shall now be more largely prosecuted He is the life and that eternal two wayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 formaliter and efficienter in himself in respect of us as being both vivus and vivificus living giving life 1. Christ is the life and that eternal life because in himself he liveth for ever this is true of him primarily as God this being one of his choice attributes that he is the living God inasmuch as divine attributes are better expressed by the abstract than the concrete he is fitly said not onely to be living but life it self and this life is most properly said to be eternal because it is so both a parte ante a parte post from everlasting to everlasting Secondarily this is true of him as Mediator God-man since though there was a time when thus he began to live to wit at his assumption of our nature and likewise his life on earth did expire to wit at his passion yet now he dieth no more death hath no more dominion over him but he is alive for evermore and that to make intercession 2. But that which I conceive most suitable to the Apostles meaning is that Christ is said to be the life because he is the original of life to us in this respect the abstract fitly agreeth to him because life is in him as sap in the root water in the fountain to convey it to all that believe on him in this sense it is that Christ useth it concerning himself as appeareth by his own Commentary I am the life whosoever believeth in me though he were dead yet shall he live hence it is that he is called by the Apostle Paul expressely our life nor is he onely life but eternal life that life which as Mediator he vouchsafeth to believers being eternal indeed all creatures are beholding to him for their natural life in him we live move and have our being but the life which believers have by him is an eternal life according as he saith himself I give to them eternal life This is that life which as the learned Davenant observeth 1 Christus promisit Christ promised to his disciples and in them to all Christians where he saith it is my Fathers good pleasure to give you the Kingdome 2 promeruit by his own death he purchased for all believers in which respect eternal life is said to be the gift of God through Iesus Christ our Lord 3 praeparavit being now ascended into heaven he there maketh ready for us according as he saith himself I go to prepare a place for you and yet more 4 inchoat he begins by the work of grace in the hearts of all the faithful in which respect he that believeth on him is said to have everlasting life and finally 5 reddet he will at the last day consummate by glory Indeed then it is that our bodies being raised our persons shall be glorified and this eternall life actually conferred therfore our blessed Saviour joyneth these two together in that forementioned place I am the resurrection and the life thus as the oyntment ran down from Aarons head to his beard and thence to his skirt so that eternal life which Christ rising from the grave personally enjoyeth shall be communicated to all his members To sum it up Christ God-man Mediator is the life that eternal life in respect of his threefold offices of King Priest and Prophet as Prophet he is the life by way of Revelation discovering this eternal life to us as Priest by way of impetration procuring this eternal life for us as King by way of collation conferring this eternal life on us and as the fulness of water is dispensed by the Sea to the Earth and the fulness of light is communicated by the Sun to the Air and the fulness of Corn was divided by Ioseph among the people so the fulness of grace and glory of life even eternal life is conveyed by Christ to his Church and therefore very justly doth this character belong to him And now what should this consideration teach us But 1. To bewail our sad condition whilest we are without Christ for if Christ be the life all that know him not or believe not in him must needs be in a state of death and damnation It is observable that St. Paul speaking of the Ephesians whilest in the state of unregeneracy saith they were dead in sins and trespasses and a little after renders this as the reason because at that time they were without Christ indeed as
manifestly intendeth the grave and its forerunner death the last but not the least nay the greatest of all temporal evils When the prophet Isaiah mentioneth One that feareth the Lord and obeyeth his voyce walking in darknesse and seeing no light no doubt he is principally to be understood of the darkness of spiritual desertion when God withholdeth the light of his countenance from the soul. Finally when we frequently read in the New Testament of utter darkness the mist of darkness blackness of darkness what else do those phrases mean but the damneds everlasting misery in being wholly deprived of the beatifical vision 3. Of iniquity in this respect it is that the power of sin ruling in mens hearts is called the power of darkness and the works of sin which they act in their lives are called the works of darkness especially flagitious enormities such as rioting and drunkenness chambring and wantonness strife and envying which are enumerated by the Apostle as the works of darkness If you ask in which of these acceptions it is here to be construed some Interpreters answer in two of them namely for ignorance and iniquity but doubtless more sutably the latter is to be understood namely sin and wickedness and chiefly gross notorious sins because the Apostle speaketh of the conversation the darkness of ignorance is that in which men are said to sit but that in which they walk is most congruously construed to be the darkness of sin And indeed so truly nay fully doth this term of darkness agree to sin that it taketh in all the other acceptions under some notion or other each of which may serve as a several reason why this appellation of darkness is given to it 1. Sin hath relation to the darkness of nature as a concomitant which it most delights in most sins are such as flie the light and love to be covered over with nights canopy St. Paul saith of drunkards that they are drunk in the night and Solomon of the young man that he goeth to the harlots house in the evening in the black and dark night and Iob of the adulterer the thief the murderer that they rebell against the light and the morning is to them even as the shadow of death To this purpose it is that Clemens Alexandrinus observeth of the Carpocratians that they appointed their meetings in the night Indeed the night being a cover to wickedness maketh men secure and shameless in committing it no marvell if they make choice of that time and there works are therefore deservedly called the works of darkness because acted in the night 2. Sin hath relation to the darkness of ignorance both as an effect and as a cause in which respect it is called by wickedness 1. No sin is committed but the Iudgement is first infatuated and therefore it is the wisemans question Do not they erre that devise mischief and the Phylosophers assertion every offender erreth there is upon the heart of every sinner atra nubes caeca nox to use the Poets expression a black cloud a dark night which causeth him to wander and the blindness of our mind is that which misguideth our feet in which respect sin is an effect 2. The commission of sin as it hardneth the heart so it blindeth the minde what mists and fogs and clouds are to the aire that are corrupt affections and flagitious actions to the soul darkning and obscuring whatever light of knowledg shineth in it in this notion we may very well understand that of the wise man when he saith the way of the wicked is as darkness the darkness of ignorance increasing upon men as they go on in sinfull wayes and in this respect sin is as a cause and because sins are caused by and withall are the causes of darkness and ignorance in the mind very fitly is this brand of darkness set upon it 3. Sin hath reference to the darkness of misery as a cause and that in its full latitude Wherefore doth the lâ—ving man complain saith the Church in respect of temporal afflictions man suffereth for the punishment of his sin all the miseries of life yea death it self being the bitter fruits of sin for so the Apostle saith expressely death entred into the world by sin It is the interposition of sin between God and us that eclipseth his loving kindness towards us so saith the Prophet Isay Your iniquities have separated between you and your God and your sins have hid his face from you finally it is wickednâ—ss that brings eternall wrâ—tchedness that being the doom denounced by our blessed Saviour against the wicked servant Cast him into utter darkness there shall be weeping and gnashâ—ng of teeth so that in this respect is sin most justly called darkness because it brings so great a darkness of sorrow and calamity upon the sinner And thus I have given a dispatch to the first of these metaphors 2. The other of walking is no less considerable a word that is very frequently used in Scripture and that to signifie in generall a course of life Indeed what is our life but a walk and all the actions of our life as so many steps and as walking in a way leadeth to some place or other so doth the course of every mans life tend to some end either of felicity or misery To this purpose is that metaphor of sowing which we so often meet with in holy writ because sowing bringeth forth some harvest or other according to the seed that is sown And I would to God that all men might hence learn so to look upon themselves as sowers as travellers therefore to make choice of their seed and take heed to their wayes more particularly this word is used both in respect of a good and an evill course of life and an instance of both we have in this and the next verse there it is applyed to a godly and here to a wâ—cked conversation That then which we are now to inquire into is what this phrase of walking imports concerning a state of sinfull living the answer to which will appear by taking notice of three properties in the motion of walking as being motus voluntarius continuus progressivus a voluntary constant and a progressive motion 1. Walking is a voluntary motion it is one thing to be drawn and another thing to goe the one is an act of violence the other of voluntariness walking is a free willing act so willing that it is an act of choice and is never done but upon a preceding delâ—berate resolution nor is it onely voluntary but delightful running is painful but walking a pleasant motion and it is a great deal of content and pleasure men take in walking All this representeth the temper of wicked men who not onely act sin but affect it a good man may be sometimes drawn into sin but bad men walk in it yea as Solomons expression is They leave the
theef and the least noyse causeth a commotion in his brest Thus is it with wicked men many times they feare according to the Psalmists expression where no feare is though withall the truth is they have alwayes reall cause of feare in respect of the danger that deservedly hangs over their heads Indeed as men in the darke sometime not seeing Feare not the perill which they are very neere to So wicked men being secure are feareles and not considering what they deserve feare not till they come to feele but when once their sleepy conscience is awakened oh what horrid feares perplexing terrours invade them whilest the cloud of vengence is ready every moment to raine fire haile and brimstone upon them To end all what now remaineth but that this discourse of darknes serve as a light to discover to you where you are what you do and whither you are going That so being enlightened to see your utter darkenesse you may walke no further but with incessant cries beseech him who is the Father of lights that he would send his spirit to plucke you out of Sodom and by his mightie working deliver you from the power of darknes translate you into the kingdome of his deare sonne Amen THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 6. If we say we have fellowship with him and walk in darkness we lie and do not the truth THat Preface which I find in the beginning of one of Salvians books concerning Gods Government of the world I may here aptly make use of I suppose yea I am confident my discourse of this Scripture will be unwelcome to many auditors and that because it is a smart and sharp reprehension men naturally love to be tickled with applause not scratched with reproof we relish well the honey of commendation but know not how to digest the wormwood of increpation But beloved the diet which is not so toothsome may be wholesome that potion which is very bitter to the taste may prove healthful to the body and faithful rebukes though they be not so pleasing yet I am sure are profitable especially when they are seasonable and sutable such as this was to those in St. Iohns time and I would to God it were not as truly agreeing to many very many in our dayes who will be found one day among the number of those lyars If we say we have fellowship with him and walk in darknesse we lye and do not the truth Having already dispatched the impiety of those mens practice in that they walk in darkness that which followeth next in order is the eminency of their profession implyed in that supposition If we say we have fellowship with him for in this supposition there is a position couched namely That many who walk in darkness say they have fellowship with God For the better explication of which in its fullest latitude I shall briefly premise a double distinction and then pursue a double proposition The distinctions to be premised are of 1. A double Having this fellowship to wit in spe and in re in a confident expectation and in a reall possession 2. A double Saying we have it namely a saying within our selves and a saying to others that is inward in respect of our thought and opinion this outward in respect most properly of our words and not excluding gestures and all other wayes of external expression The propositions to be prosecuted are two 1. Many say they have fellowship with God in hope who yet walk in darkness they promise to themselves the future vision of Gods face whilest they go on in the wilfull breach of Gods Law This is that which they say in their hearts perswading themselves that their condition shall be happy though their conversation is wicked of such an one it is Moses speaketh who blesseth himself in his heart saying I shall have peace though I walk in the imaginations of my own heart This is that they say with their lips impudently laying as full claim to happiness as the uprightest and exactest Saint If you inquire whence this comes to pass I answer from the false reasonings which are in the minds of men concerning The freeness of Gods grace in electing The fulness of his mercy in forgiving The worthiness of Christs blood in redeeming 1. When presumptuous sinners hear that Gods election is without respect to any worthiness or qualifications in us they presently fancy to themselves that their names may be written in the book of life as well as any other yea they fondly imagine that being elected they shall have fellowship with God let them live as they list and hence they are emboldned to presume and boast of a future well-being not considering that Gods election though it be not conditional yet is ordinate to wit to the end by the means to happiness by holiness 2. When wicked men look upon the extent of Gods mercy whereby it is that he desireth not the death of a sinner that he is a God pardoning iniquity transgression and sin not onely few but many small but great all sorts of sin they promise to themselves a facility of obtaining forgiveness whilest yet they indulge to their sins not considering that God is just as well as merciful righteous as well as gracious and he is ready to pardon the penitent so he will by no means clear the guilty Finally when secure sinners hear of the infinite merit of Christs blood how satisfactory it is for the sins of the whole world and therefore much more of a particular person they are willing to perswade themselves of an interest in that blood and thereby of reconciliation and fellowship with God not considering what our Apostle saith in the very next verse the bloud of Iesus Christ cleanseth from all sin but it is onâ—ly those who walke in the light Thus is the sweetest hony turned into gall by bad stomachs the most wholsome antidotes become poyson to wicked men and the pretious supports of a lively faith are abused to be props of presumption by arrogant hypocrites by reason whereof it is that they are so impudent as to say they hope to have fellowshâ—p with God though they walk in darkness 2. Many who walk in darkness say they have actually this Divine fellowship and are in a state of grace As for the grossest sort of hypocrites who make pretences of religion and holiness a cover of their wickedness they cannot say it in their hearts because their consciences must needs tell them they are wicked and odious in God sight but they say it to the world that they may walk in the dark and accomplish their wicked designs the more secretly speedily and effectually But as for others they say it both in opinion and profession they think and accordingly boast themselves to have communion with God though they walk in the darkness both of sin and error Instances of this nature there want not many in all times of the
a legall word and in both it represents this blood of Christ. 1. As it is a metaphoricall word What water is in the corporal that is this blood of Christ in the spiritual cleansing blood in a natural way is not cleansing but defilâ—ng and besmearing and yet what water doth to material that this blood doth to the immaterial cleansing in this respect it is that as men use to wash themselves in water so Christ is said to wash us in his blood to this the promise in Ezechiel properly alludeth where God saith I will sprinkle clean water upon you and for this end certainly Christ instituted water as the element in the holy Sacrament of Baptism that he might thereby signifie the cleansing efficacy of his blood 2. As it is a legall word What the blood of beasts in the law did tipically that the blood of Christ doth really to wit cleanse from sin The Authour to the Hebrews observeth that almost all things in the law were purified with blood and without shedding of blood there was no remâ—ssion thus in the ceremonies for legal uncleanness there was for the most part blood used and in their sacrifices for expiation of moral uncleaness there was shedding of blood to both which the Apostle alludeth when he speaketh of the blood of Bulls and Goats and the ashes of an heyfer the blood of Bulls and Goats being shed in their sin-offerings and the ashes of a slain heyfer used in cleansing those that touched a dead body And surely what were all these cleansings by blood but types and figures of the cleansing by Christs blood for which cause the Apostle manifestly calls these purifyings patterns of the heavenly things indeed as the same holy writer saith it is not possible that the blood of Bulls and Goats should take away sin so that when expiation of sin is attributed to them it is only to be understood in a tipical and sacramental sense as they were shadows figures representations of this blood whereof my Text speaketh and therefore it is they all vanished and were abrogated from the time of the shedding of this blood in which they had their accomplâ—shment and by which this admirable effect was really and fully performed the cleansing from all sin For the better understanding of this precious truth give me leave briefly to resolve these three Queries What we are here to understand by the blood of Christ. What kind of causality this blood hath to the cleansing from sin Whence it is that this blood hath this causalâ—ty and when I have thus opened the vein of this clause I shall the better let out the blood contained it for your spiritual refreshment 1. In answer to the first of these you must know that this blood of Christ is here to be taken both metonymically and synechdochically 1. Metonymically Socinus making use of this trope understandeth by Christs blood Gods new Covenant in which this benefit is promised a sence which if admitted yet according to a right construction will nothing advance his design It is true he maketh it a metonymy of the adjunct as if the covenant were called Christs blood onely because it is confirmed by it but when St. Paul telleth us in general that all the promises are in him yea is well as Amen made as made good yea when our blessed Saviour in particular calleth it the blood of the new Testament or Covenant because it was shed not so much for confirming the covenant wherein remâ—ssion of sins is promised us for the remission that is obtaining the remission of sins which is promised in that covenant it plainly appeareth that if by blood we will understand the covenant it must be a metonymy not so much of the adjunct as of the cause so it amounts to thus much that the remission of sin which is promised in the new covenant is procured by the blood of Christ which is as much as the orthodox doctrin asserts But the right metonymy here necessarily to be taken notice of is by the blood to understand the death of Christ and this of the cause for the effect because by the violent effusion of his blood his death was effected The better to clear this take notice that the blood of Christ was shed according to St. Bernard who supposeth they drew blood from his cheeks when they smote him seven but rather six several times Soon after his birth when at his câ—rcumcâ—sion they took away the foreskâ—n of his flesh a little before his death in the garden when he was cast into that bloody sweat in his scourging when they plowed his back with whips and made long furrows on his shoulders upon his coronation when they platted his head with a crown of thorns at his death on the Cross in the piercing of his feet and hands with nayls after his death when his side was opened with a spear blood and water gushing forth and truly though none of these times his blood was shed in vain yet it is the blood of the Cross when together with his blood he powred out his life that was the offering for sin in which respect it is expressely so called by St. Paul It is indeed by some asserted that one drop of his blood by reason of the hypostatical union might have sufficed for the redemption of the world but that must be taken cum grano salis since supposing at least Gods decree it was no less blood then his life-blood that could avail to the accomplishing this expiation 2. Synecdochically Socinâ—anizing Vorstius making use of this trope extends the synecdoche to that which he cals the whole oblation of Christ and so comprehendeth not only his antecedent obedience but his subsequent glory to wit of his resurrection ascension session and intercession But inasmuch as the authour to the Hebrews expressely saith that when he had purged our sins he sate down at the right hand of God and again he entred into the holy place having obtained eternal redemption for us yea our blessed Saviour himself being ready to up the Ghost cried it is finished I shall not noubt to assert but that what concerned the acquisition of this great benefit was then fully performed though the resurrection with the consequents of it were needful for the effectual application of it to us This Synecdoche therefore is to be extended onely to his passion one part put for the whole of his sufferings and so we are to construe it not onely of his blood but his body since as the one was shed the other was crucified and as here his bloud cleanseth from sin so in St. Peter he is said to beare our sins on his body yea St. Paul ascribeth our reconciliation both to his bloud and to his body nor yet onely of his body and bloud but his soule also in which suffering a subtraction of the Divine vision he cryed out upon the Crosse My God my God
that punishment which belonged to us we must needs be thereby acquitted and cleansed to this purpose he is called by the Authour to the Hebrews a surety and look as the surety paying his debt for whom he is bound dischargeth him from his creditor so Christ suffering our punishment freeth us from the obligation to it which is all one with cleansing from the guilt of sin and the reason is plain for since the guilt of sin is its binding the sinner over to the punishmenâ— Christ taking that punishment upon himself and suffering it in our roome must needs thereby cleanse us from that guilt so that in few words Christs blood being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a laver became 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a price satisfactory for our debt hath obtained the forgiveness of it to us and so we are cleansed Having in some measure according to the scriptures explained the genuine notion of this causality I shall not much trouble my selfe nor you with those farfetched and ieiune inventions of the Socinians whereby they endeavour to elude these truths and yet I cannot passe by one evasion because it is that Socinus annexeth to this very scripture as if this saying the blood of Christ cleanseth from sin were no more but that his blood declareth us to be assureth us that we are cleansed so that what the Orthodox attribute to the Sacrament instituted by Christ in commemoration of his blood that these Hereticks attribute to the blood it selfe but how incongruous it is to expound this of a declarative cleansing appeareth in that the Apostle who could best interpret his own language in the very next verse save one unfolds it by forgiving besides this construction maketh cleansing from sin to antecede Christs blood for if it did not praeexist there not be could any declaring or confirming of it whereas the scripture both here else where plainly positively asserteth this cleansing to flow from come through the blood of Christ the consideration hereof no doubt forced Socinus to the finding out of other solutions and there fore he sometimes asserts that Christs blood cleanseth inasmuch as it perswadeth us to a beleefe hope of eternall life whereby we are induced to holiness of life and so our sins are cleansed but all which is hereby ascribed to Christs death is only a morall causality nay rather a meere antecedency sure it is Christs resurection rather then his death which ingenders that faith and hope in us and it is not imaginable that the scripture should so often attribute that to the death which cheifely depends on the resurrection of Christ adde to this which is very considerable how remote if any at all an influence it is which Christs blood according to this sence hath upon this cleansing for as Grotius hath well observed the thread must be drawn out to this length Forgiveness and cleansing from sin is conferred upon them that live holily to live holily we are induced by a certaine faith and hope of the reward the example of Christ raised from the dead and exalted to glory for the holinesse of his life is a way to beget this faith hope that glorifying and rising his death did necessarily antecede and thus our cleansing from sin is obtained by his blood but how credible it is that the scriptue should so frequently so positively so expresly attribute this cleansing to Christs blood and yet the dependance of these one upon the other to be at so remote a distance and of so slender an energie let any one who hath but a competent use of his reason Judge 3. I proceed therefore to the answer of the last question nor need we go further then the text it selfe to finde that if you would know how this blood becometh so effectuall to cleanse from sin the answer is because it is the blood of Iesus Christ his son I shall not altogether passe by nor yet insist upon that note which Estius hath upon the blood of his son that in them there is a confutation of three heresyes at once the Mâ—â—ichees who deny the truth of Christs humane nature since as Alexander said of his wound clamat me esse hominem it proclaymeth me a man we may say of his blood for had he not beene man he could not have bled have dyed the Ebionites who deny him to be God since being Gods naturall son he must needs be of the same essence with himselfe and the Nestorians who make two persons which if true the blood of Christ the man could not have been called the blood of Christ the son of God That which I conceive here chiefly to be taken notice of is that our Apostle contents not himselfe to say the blood of Jesus Christ but he addeth his son to intimate to us how this blood became avaâ—leable to our cleansing to wit as it was the blood not meerly of the son of Mary the son of David the son of Man but of him who was also the son of God Indeed that it was the blood of an innocent pure unsinnâ—ng man did much conduce to this worke since had he beene himselfe a sinner he could not have cleansed us from our sins and therefore our Apostle in the next chapter joyneth these two together Jesus Christ the righteous the propitiation for our sins and the Apostle Peter puts these together as of a pretious lambe without spot and blemish to this purpose it is St. Austin saith the blood because it was the blood of him who had no sin himselfe was shed for the remission of our sins and Leo sutably the powring out of a just mans blood for the unjust was effectuall to our redemption But though this was a necessary qualification in this person who did shed his blood for this end yet that which gave the efficacy and merit to his blood was the fullness of the Godhead which dwelt in him personaly thus Damasen speaking of his deity addeth thence his passion became of a saving and quickâ—ning virtue and St. Cyrill expresly his blood had not been a price for the worlds sin if he had been only man Indeed Socinus asserts that the dignity of his person added nothing to the value of his sufferings because the divinity it selfe did not suffer but though the Godhead did not suffer yet Godman did suffer and he who endured the punishment was God though he did not indure it as God in these respects it is said they crucify'd the Lord of Glory and God is said to purchase his Church with his blood and here it is called the blood of Iesus Christ his son and we may as well say it is all one to kill a King as a beggar a Father as a stranger because the mortall wound is directed against the body not the dignity or affinity The summe then is this Christs deity being personally united to his manhood giveth an efficacy to his sufferings hence
it is that his person being infinite the worth of his blood is infinite and so it became commensurate and adaequate both to the infinite demerit of the sin committed by us and the eternity of the punishment which was to have been inflicted upon us and by the same reason that mans sin being a finite act yet deserveth an infinite punishment because perpetrated against an infinite majesty Christs death though a temporary passion cannot but be infinitely satisfactory because it is the death of an infinite person Christ Iesus the son of God blessed for ever And now what other use should we make of this but as both a looking-glasse and an antidote 1. In this truth as in a looking-glasse let us see these two things the haynous nature of our sins and the unparaleld measure of Christs love 1. View oh sinner the hainous nature of thy sins from which nothing but Christs blood can cleanse thâ—e sin if looked upon in the glasse of the law cannot but appeare sinfull but when beheld in the blood of Christ it must needs appeare beyond measure sinfull ex consideratione remedii periculi aestimo quantitatem saith St. Bernard excellently take notice of the greatnes of thy disease and danger in the remedy prepared for the cure of the one and prevention of the other Oh how great is that wound which nothing could heal but the Physitians death The truth is Christs blood in respect of sin is both aggravating and diminishing look upon sin in Christs blood one way it appeareth not so terrible because this blood cleanseth from it look upon it another way it appeareth abhominable because it could not be cleansed but by this blood Tell me oh sinner why dost thou make nothing to defile thy self with that which cost thy Saviour so dear to cleanse thee from how much rather should thy sins wring tears from thee since they drew blood from Christ 2. Behold oh Sinner the exceeding love of thy Saviour who that he might cleanse thee when polluted in thy blood was pleased to shed his owne bloud Indeed the powring out of Christs blood was eximium charitatis opus a superexcellent worke of charity hence it is that these two are joyned together and when the scripture speaketh of his love it presently annexeth his sufferings so St. Paul who loved me and gave himselfe for me so St. Iohn who loved us and washed us from our sins in his owne blood We read that when Christ wept for Lazarus the standers by said see how he loved him surely if his tears much more his bloud proclaimeth his affection towards us thus may we see the bowels of his compassion through the wounds of his passion The Iewes were the scribes the nayles were the pens his body the white paper and his bloud the red inke and the characters were love exceeding love and these so fairely written that he which runs may read them I shut up this with that of devout Bernard Behold and look upon the rose of his bloudy passion how his redness bespeaketh his flaming love there being as it were a contention betwixt his passion and affection this that it might be hotter that that it might be redder nor had his sufferings been so red with bloud had not his heart been enflamed with love Oh let us beholding magnify magnifying admire and admiring praise him for his inestimable goodness saying with the holy Apostle unto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his bloud be honour and glory for ever 2. Make use of this truth as a cordiall to revive thy drooping soul in a time of inward affliction it is the note of Oecumenius upon the text Is any one affrighted with the light and sense of sin Let this cleansing by the bloud of Christ make him confident and to the like purpose St. Austin the devil hath put in a caveat an hand-writing against us but let us be secure the blood of Christ hath blotted it out Me thinks I hear some wounded broken sinner crying out in dispaire Woe is me that ever I was born my sins are for number innumerable for measure unmeasurable and I am not able to cleanse my selfe from any no not the least of them Oh what mountaines of grievous sins lye upon my back that I am not able to look up oh what scarlet crimson bloudy sins continually sly in my face that I am not able to behold without desperation oh that I had never been oh that I might be no more whether shall I sly who carry my guilt still along with me What shall I do to be eased of this oppressing burden Ah my sinfull soule what will become of thee Vile wretch that I am where shall I appear But stay thou despaâ—ring sinner with poore Hagar in the wildernesse thou art crying weeping dying when as behold a well of water is by thee a fountaine of bloud is opened for sin and for uncleanness thou dost well to bewayle thy own sin but thou dost ill to forget thy Saviours bloud Thou sayst thou art a great sinner true else Christ needed not have shed his bloud thou sayst thou art a great sinner be it so yet Christs bloud cleanseth from all sin And therefore is Christs bloud sayd to cleanse from all sin because there is no sin so great from which it cannot cleanse what if thy sins be clouds thick clouds yet the beames of this sun of righteousnesse can dissipate them what though they be mountaines yet this red sea can swallow them what though they be scarlet sins yet this scarlet bloud can make them white as snow View the catalogue of those sinners whom this bloud hath cleansed and thou shalt find fornicatours idolaters adulterers effae'minate abusers of themselves with mankind theeves covetous drunkards revilers extorâ—tioners have been washed by it for such saith St. Paul to the Corinthians were some of ye but ye are washed look once again and thou shalt find a blasphemer a persecuter for such was Paul himselfe nay murderers even those who had a hand in the murder of Christ himselfe for such were those converts at St. Peters sermon cleansed mercyfully by this very bloud which they shed so cruelly Sinners this bloud still as it were runs afresh and the efficacy of it is as full now as it was at first onely remember that this bloud which was shed cleanseth not unlesse it be sprinkled so much David intimateth in that prayer purge me with hisope hysope being that by which the bloud of sacrifice was sprinkled to which answereth faith wereby our souls are sprinkled with this bloud of Christ. The brazen Serpent cured those who were stung with the fiery Serpent but not without their looking on it The bloud of Christ can cleanse us from all our sins but not without our applying it Go then oh sinner in a sence of thy own filthiness to thy blessed Saviour
say to him with the Leper Lord if thou wilt thou canst make me clean with the Father of the child Lord I believe help my unbelief remember his gracious invitation to come and his comfortable promise of ease and be not faithless but beleeving Nor needest thou mingle any water with this bloud popish pennances pilgrimages indulgencies or any such like inventions of superstitious dotages this bloud alone can cleanse and by joyning any thing with it thou dost what lyeth in thee to defile and debase this bloud To him then and him alone have recourse with a lowly yet lively confidence relying on the merits of his bloud which cleanseth from all sinne 2. You have seen the position in it selfe be pleased now to look upon it in its reflection on what proceedeth and thus we may consider it two wayes Either as these words are an answer to some objection which may be made against the preceding Or as the preceding words prevent a misapplication which may be made of these 1. Whereas the Apostle saith in the former part of the verse If we walke in the light as he is in the light we have fellwoship one with another It may be objected though we now walke in the light yet before we walked in darkness and will not that hinder our Communion nay besides though we walk in the light yet we still fall into darkness and will not that make a seperation between God and us to both these we have a cleare answer returned in these words 1. As for our past sins committed before conversion they shal not hinder this fellowshâ—p because so and is somtimes taken especially by S. John the bloud of Christ cleanseth from all sins To wit as some expound it truly though not fully all past sin it is the promise of Almighty God made by Ezechiell that when the wicked turneth from his wickedness that he hath committed all his transgressions that he hath committed they shall not be mentioned to him indeed the convert himselfe still penitently remembers them buâ— God mercifully forgets them and why the bloud of Christ cleanseth from them whence by the way it is well observed by Zanchy that it is not our walkâ—ng in the lâ—ght cleanseth from our former workes of darkness but the bloud of Christ. Our present obedience is not cannot be any compensation to God for our former disobedience we now doe no more then we ought to do and therefore it cannot satisfy for our former doing what we ought not and not doing what we ought to do but the merit of Christs bloud both can and doth expiate our former guilt 2. As for our present sins whither continuall infirmities or our particular grosse acts into which we may fall notwithstanding we walk in the light from these upon our repentance the bloud of Christ cleanseth so our fellowshâ—p with God continueth it is true we cannot walke so exactly but sin will cleave to us sin in whomsoever it is cannot but provoke God to seperate from him I but the bloud of Christ cleanseth us from our sins whereby it is that we still have fellowshâ—p with God Thus doth this sentence at once both infirmitatis nostrae nos admonere admonish us of our own weakness adversus desperationem munire arme us against those fears which the sins we fall into by reason of that weaknesse may prompt us to whilst we have still a refuge to flie to a rock to lay hold upon a plaster to make use of even this bloud of Jesus Christ which cleanseth from all sin 2. There is yet another relative consideration of these words which would by no means be left out as being that which may serve like the angels flaming sword to keep of impenitent sinners from comming to the tree of life Brethren this is a very comfortable doctrine which you have heard of Christs bloud cleansing from all sin and I doubt too many will be ready to lay hold on it to whom it doth not yet belong when therefore you apply this comfort take with you the condâ—tion if we walke in the lâ—ght as he is in the light the bloud of Christ cleanseth from all sin And remember that this hypotheticall proposition is aequivalent to an exceptive unless we walk in the light the bloud of Christ will not cleanse us Hence then impenitent presumptuous sinners here is bread indeed but not for Dogs a pearle but not for swine The comfort of this text is precious but not common and though that his bloud is able to cleanse all yet it only will cleanse them that walk in the light It is the strange conceit of many that all is so done for them that nothing needs to be done by them whereas Christs bloud so cleanseth from sin that we must walk in the light it is the horrid presumption of some that though they live in sin they shall be cleansed by Christs death whereas his bloud cleanseth onely such as walk in the light Oh then let us not deceive our selves with vain hopes Christ hath borne our sins we must not therefore think to lay what load upon him we please he onely taketh away their sins who cast away their sins Christs death is a plaister for wounded sinners but we must not presumptuously wound our selves in hope that this plaister will cure us Finally Christs bloud is a rich treasure to defray the debts of humble sinners and to beare the expences of such to heaven but there is nothing allowed for wanton prodigals who spend freely and sin lavishly upon the account of Christs merits and therefore to end all be sure in reading and applying to joyne the beginning of the verse with the end If we walke in the light the bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth from all sin THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 8 9 10. If we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us If we confesse our sins he is faithfull and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness If we say we have not sinned we make him a lyar and his word is not in us THat vision which Moses saw of a bush burning in the fire is symbolically applyed to instruct us in that most exquisite wisdom the knowledge of God and our selves nor unfitly since flaming fire is a fit embleme of Gods purity and the thornie bush of mans iniquity This sight me thinketh St. Iohn presenteth us within this Chapter if you please to cast your eyes on the sixth verse you may behold the fire a delineation of Gods holinesse who is light without any darknesse here in these verses you may meet with the bush a declaration of mans sinfulness It was the prayer of a devout Ancient Domine noverim te noverim me Lord let know thee let me know my self this ought to be the prayer the study of every Christian to know Gods purity that
reason why we may not as wel expound the 10. by the 8. as the 8. by the 10. besides it is an usuall hebraeisme which kind of phrase our Apostle much followeth to put the preterperfect tense for the present therefore it is more rationall to expound those words we have not sinned by those we have no sin then these by those and so this assertion is verified concerning all Christians not only before but after conversion indeed this is not mine but St. Austins note upon the 8 verse St. John doth not say if we say we had but have no sin indeed there are two places in this epistle which seeme to contradict this construction of these words the one where he saith he that is borne of God cannot sin and the other not much unlike where he saith that which is borne of God sinneth not What the full sense of these Scriptures is I shall God willing insist upon in their proper placesâ— for the present it may suffice to answer either with St. Austin that he who is born of God sinneth not to wit as he is born of God Regenerate men being therefore subject to sin because but in part regenerate and that holy men fall into sin is because of the remainders of the old man not so far as their natures are renewed or else as St. John seemeth to expound himselfe in the one place that he who is born of God doth not sin that is doth not commit sin which being a synonimous phrase with working iniquity is onely true of unregenerate persons and in the other place that he who is born of God sinneth not that sin of which he there speaketh in particular namely the sin unto death notwithstanding which it still remaineth as a truth that even they who are borne of God cannot say they have no sin at all 2. This totall immunity from sin is denyed not onely of ordinary but eminent even the holyest Saints that have been are or shall be The We of whom my Text speaketh were the Apostles who as they were dignified in office above others so no doubt they obtained greater measure of grace then others yea he that includeth himselfe in the number was St. John who of all the Apostles was most beloved of Christ and as St. Austin excellently Who can say he is without sin when he that leaned in the bosome of Christ saith If we say we have no sin Indeed as Jehu wrote to the rulers of Iezreel in another case look out even the best and meetest of your Masters Sonnes I may say in this looke out even the best and holyest of Gods children see if any of them can or dare wholly acquit themselves from sin the truth is as that forementioned Father saith If we shall ask all the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles Martyrs de sepissi dum in hoc corpore degerent una voce concorditer responderent they would with one consent say of themselves as living on earth in these words If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves To this purpose is the observation of Beza and Zanch. upon the text Consider who it is that here speaketh and that in his own person who then can be excepted out of the catalogue It is true there is one whom he calleth in the next chapter Iesus Chrâ—st the righteous who is most justly to be excepted of him it is said He did all things well Himselfe maketh the challeng Which of you can convince me of sins he was no doubt altogether free from the least spot or staine of corruption but as for any other exception this generall rule admits none I know the papists contend very earnestly that the Mother might be exempted as well as the Son asserting her to be free from all kind of sin It is true St. Austin in one place speaking of the saints sinfulnesse doth except her but not in their senâ—se as if she were not a sinner but for the honour of Christ he would not have her mentioned as a sinner and therefore elsewhere he is cleare and expresse that all are sinners except the one onely mediator between God and man nor need we feare to injure the blessed Virgin in joyning her with the rest when as her selfe calling Christ her Saviour acknowledgeth her selfe to be a sinner indeed that her conception of Christ should be without sin was needful but that she her selfe should be without all sin was not necessary nor doth the Scripture or the ancient Church affirme Clement Alexandrinus is expresse onely the word is without fault and St. Basil the Scripture beareth witnesse onely to one that he knew no sin Tertullian expressely our Lord commandeth his disciples to pray forgive us our trespasses as knowing himselfe onely without sin I shut up this with St. Ieroms saying If there be any who may attain to this state of perfect purity he must be holyer then any nay then all the Apostles 3. This perfect freedome from sin is not denyed de suturo but de praesenti of the future but onely the present time Our Apostle doth not say If we say we shal have no sin nay it is an undoubted verity there will be a time when we shall sin no more yea when sin shall be no more As man in his created estate had a posse non peccare a possibility of not sinning so in his glorified condition he shall have a non posse peccare an impossibility of sinning But now as in his fallen estate he cannot say he doth any good so in his renewed condition he cannot say he hath no evill Alexander Alensis starteth an objection of Pelagius seemingly very accute nay solid that either God would have us without sin or he would not to say he would not have us without sin were to deny his nature contradict his word which calleth upon us to sin no more If he would have us without sin then surely we may be so since the Divine Will cannot be conversant about impossibilities To which he returneth this answer and that very aptly to our present purpose God would have us without sin quantum ad futurum statum as to the future but not as to our present state And if you desire a fuller untying of the knot be pleased to know that 1. Voluntate praecepti God calleth upon us to be perfect as he is perfect and requireth us to lay apart all filthinesse nor is it unjust for him to command that which we might once have done but now through our own default cannot and so is impossible not per se but per accidens in its own nature but accidently yea in wisdome he commands men not to sin though he know they cannot but sin that in the disobedient he may punish not the cannot but the will not thereby glorifying his justice and in the obedient he may reward the willing to doe what they cannot and so glorifie
let us look upon our black feet and as with one eye we behold the good that is done by us so with the other the evill that remaineth in us 2. Charitable towards their brethren If thy brother be overtaken in a fault restore him with a spirit of meeknesse give to thy neighbours actions the allowance of humane frailty and be not too rigid in censuring other mens faults If they offend in one thing perhaps thou art more guilty in another if they fall to day thou mayst tomorrow the same corruption that hath led another aside is still in thee and if grace withdraw will soon prevail over thee indeed if you practise the former duty you will soon learn this pride and censoriousnesse are ever companions and he that is lowly in his own esteem will be charitable towards others 3. Watchful over their own hearts indeed he that carrieth gun-powder about him had need beware the least sparks of fire what cause have we to take heed of every temptation who are at best so prone to be led into it Happy is the man saith SolomoÌ„ that feareth always no doubt he sinneth least that most feareth lest he should sin it is Jobs saying of himself according to the vulgar Latine verebar omnia opera mea I did fear all my works let the best do so fear themselves in all their actions lest they should fall into sin 4. Frequent in prayer to God for this shall every one that is godly pray to thee saith David for this what because of his sins and who not the wickedest but the godly in this respect have cause to pray and for what should he pray surely for renewed pardon for increase of grace and for the perfection of glory We cannot say we have no sin Oh then let us pray with David Enter not into judgement with thy servant oh Lord where there is a double emphasis observable it is not ab hoste but à servo though Gods servant yet he would not have God to enter into judgement with him and again ne intres it is the very entrance into judgment that he dreads and prayeth against not only do not proceed but do not so much as enter when we have done our best we have need to crave for mercy Again we cannot say we have no sin let us pray for more grace that we may every day have lesse sin so doth Paul in effect when he confesseth himself not to have already attained but resolveth to reach forward we must never cease to hunger and thirst after greater measures of righteousness till we are wholly and perfectly without any stain of sin and therefore we must continually say with the Apostles Lord increase our faith and all other graces of thy spirit in us Finally since we cannot now in this life say we have no sin how should we pray and sigh and long to be possessed of that future felicity indeed in this respect only it is lawful and commendable to desire death that we may be free not from pain or misery but from sin and iniquity upon this ground we may we ought and the stronger we are in grace the more earnestly we should groan for the day of our perfect redemption when we shall be cloathed with unspotted purity perfect felicity and that to all eternity AMEN THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 8.10 If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and there is no truth in us If we say we have not sinned we make him a lyar and his word is not in us IT is one of the sage counsels which the wise man giveth Turn not to the right hand nor to the left remove thy foot from evill the genuine and literal sense whereof no doubt is that we must keep the straight way which God hath chalked before us in his word not in the least declining on either hand but withall there are severall allusions and profitable applications made of these words by the Ancients Hugo taketh the right hand as an embleme of prosperity to which we must not turn by being too much lâ—fâ—ed up and the left hand of adversity which we must not turn to by being too much cast down veneâ—oble â—edâ— resembleth by the right hand 〈◊〉 to which we must not turn by being wise above what is written and by the left hand folly to which we must not turn by giving our selves up to its dictates once more to our present purpose according to St. Austin To turn to the right hand is by saying we have no sin to deceive our selves to turn to the left hand is to go on in sin and yet think our selves safe and our condâ—tion happy Both these our Apostle warneth us of in this Chapter and it is not mine but Aretius his observation where he saith the Kings high way lyeth betwixt two extremes the one whereof is to will a continuance in our sins the other to acquit our selves from having any sin the former of these which is secura delectatio peccati a secure delight in sin is that which is sharply reproved at the sixth verse which calleth those lyars who walk in darknesse live in wickedness and yet boast of communion with God the latter of these which is superba justitiae presumptio proud presumption of our own righteousness is no less severely condemned in these verses letting such know how vainly they cozen themselves and highly they injure God If we say we have c. Having already dispatched the first branch of the confutation which is the truth implicitely asserted proceed we now to the second which is the errour expresly refuted for the handling whereof be pleased to observe these two things The opinion wherein the errour consists and that is set down in the beginning of the eighth and the tenth verses If we say we have no sin if we say we have not sinned The arguments by which it is refuted and disswaded drawn from The folly of it in that we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us verse eighth The impiety of it in that we make God a lyar and his word is not in us verse tenth Begin we with the opinion it self which we see is not singly mentioned but ingeminated as if our Apostle would hereby insinuate that it is at once both a very common and very dangerous disease no lesse spreading then deadly infecting in some degree or other the greatest part of men of Christians The manner of committing this moral errour is saying which refers both to the tongue and the mind saying is not only peculiar to the lips every thought is interpreted by God a saying the heart may cry when the tongue is silent and we may say when we do not speak Hence it is that though this be not our open assertion or outward protestation yet if it be our inward thought our secret imagination we shall be found guilty before God The
as lyable to the penalty so is the forgiven sinner from the punishment it selfe which is the remote term and the obligation to it which is the proxime term of pardon in this respect it is that Anselm saith to forgive sinne is not to punish it and St. Austin to the same purpose it is Gods not marking inquity so as to inflict the penalty due to it and the Schooles to remit the sinne is not to impute it so as to punish it For the fuller opening this truth know 1 On the one hand there is a great deale of difference between these two to withhold the execution off and to withdraw the obligation to the punishment it is one thing for a creditor to give day of payment and another thing to cancell the bond indeed the phrase used by Moses of Gods forgiving his people from Egypt untill now seemeth chiefely to intend his sparing to punish them but that is forgivenesse in a larger and improper sence according to the genuine notion there is a vast difference between forgiving and forbearing mercy As learned Davenant upon those words forbearing forgiving one another hath observed that there is far more in the latter than in the former since a man may forbear revenge meerly for want of ability or opportunity so is it true though not upon the same ground in respect of God his forgiving is farre more then his forbearing and therefore this latter hee vouchsafeth even to those who goe on in sinne but the former onely to them who confesse theâ—r sin since whereas by the one it is onely hee doth not as yet by the other it is that he will not at all punish 2 On the other hand there is a great deal of difference betwixt afflâ—cting for sin and punishâ—ng for sin properly so called for though the meritorious cause of both be the same to wit sin yet the impulsive cause from within is different that from an anger mixed with love this from meer anger and purely judiciall wrath besides the finall cause is far differenâ— that is for emendation of the person this is for satisfaction of the law and so whereas that is medicinall this is exitiall That God doth afflict his own people for sin yea for sinne after it is forgiven is a case so cleare that it cannot upon any just reason be denied The Antinomians doe but discover their owne blindnesse whilest they deny that God seeth sinne so as to correct it in justified persons that instance of David is pregnant whom the prophet tels as it were with one breath that God had forgiven his sinne and yet for that sinne the childe must dye that of the Psalmist concerning the Isralites is very plaine Thou wast a God that forgavest their sinne though thou tookest vengeance of their iniquities finally that of the Corinthians is no lesse apposite who though they were forgiven and therefore should not be condemned with the world yet were judged and chastized of the Lord for their sinne of unworthy receiving the holy sacrament But still though God doe afflict yet hee doth not punish for sinne those whom hee forgiveth unlesse as all afflictions may in some sort bee called punishments and the reason is plain because punishing for sinne is in a war of revenge and Satisfaction which are direâ—tly opposite to forgivenesse and wee may as well say that â— judge can at the same time pardon a malefactor and exâ—â—ute him as that God can punish when hee forgiveth indeed because those eternall miseries have most properly in them rationem paenae the nature of satâ—sfactory punâ—shment therefore forgiveness chiefly consists in taking off the obligation to that according to St. Pauls Phrâ—se There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus but yet it is no less true that the oblâ—gation to temporall as well as eternall punishâ—enâ— is taken off so that though the same ouâ—ward miseries seize upon pardoned as well as unpardâ—ned sinners yet nâ—t in the same way as hath been already iâ—timated and therefore though God doe inflict many miseries of life yea death it self upon forgiven sinners to make them feel the smart of sinnâ— watchfull how they run into sinne and to declare his justice against sinne yet not in the least to satisfy his justice upon them for sinne that being already most fully as I shall hereafter shew performed by Christ. 2 You see the significancy of the first word and thereby the nature of the thing passe wee on to the second which though the same as to the thing with the former yet wants not its peculiar emphasis That distinction of Divines concerning remissio culpe paenae the remission of the fault and the punishment may not unfittly bee made use of for a distinct reference of those two expressions the former of forgiving more properly refers to the remission of the punishment though yet it includeth the fault as a creditor cancelleth the bond doth thereby remit the debt it selfe this latter of cleansing chiefely refers to the remission of the fault which defileth though it include the punishment because it is of that defilement which is contracted through the guilt of sinne And now as in the former so in this expression wee have two things considerable what unrightâ—ousnesse doth and what pardon doth 1 What unrighteousnesse dothâ— it maketh the sinner filthy and polluted in Gods sight sinnes as they are debita debts so they are said to bee remitted and blotted out and as they are sordes filthy so they are said else where to bee covered and here to bee cleansed Oh then how odious is an unpardoned sinner in Gods sight It is very observable how Almighty God describing the sinfull state of rebellious Israel borroweth a metaphor from a châ—ld that is not swadled but lieth polluted in its bloud the Psalmist speaking of wicked men saith They are corrupt â—nd become abominable where the former word iâ— borrowâ—d from a dead carkass and truely â— child in its bloud is not more loathsome to our eyes a carkasse on the dunghill is not more nâ—isome to our smell then a sinfull wretch is in Gods eyes and to his nostrils 2 What forgivenesse doth it cleanseth the sinner An expression that must not be strained too much as 〈◊〉 according to the doctrine of the Church of Rome the pardoning of sinne were an utter extinction and aboâ—â—tâ—on of it as cleansing doth wholy take away filthâ— truâ— it is where sinne is forgiven the filth of sinne is in some measure and shall at last bee wholly removed but that is onely the effect of glorification not of justification or sanctification and indeed as if our Apostle would prevent any such inference from this Phrase wee finde him subioyning if wee say wee have not sinned as before whâ—n hee speaketh of Christs cleansing he addeth if wee say wee have no sinne so that sinne is therefore said to bee cleansed not that the
1. Some interpreters make faithful and just to be synonima's therefore he is faithful and just because it is just he should be faithful in this respect the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth truth is by the Septuagint translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that signifieth righteousnesse nor is it without reason because it is a righteous thing to be true before a man maketh a promise he is free to make it or not but when he hath made it he is not free to keep it or not by promise a man becometh a debtor and for one to pay his debt is no more then just Indeed this is not exactly true in regard of God because we never so fully perform the condition but it is justly lyable to exception yet after a sort it is that which he accounts himself engaged to in point of justice to perform all his promises and therefore though it is meer mercy which maketh it is justice which fulfilleth the promise This interpretation Socinus layeth hold on hereby to evade the doctrine of satisfaction which this word according to its proper sense doth clearly â—avour But the designe of the Holy Ghost being in these words to strengthen our weak faith in beleeving the pardon of sin I conceive we shall do best to expound the words in that way which may most â—onduce to this end and that is as affording not only a single but a double prop to our faith from a double attribute in God and therefore I waâ—e this interpretation 2. Others there are who distinguishing these two understand by justice mercy so Grotius here saith I interpret just to be good gentle and Illyricus observeth that righteousnesse is sometimes taken for benignity and clemency in this respect iâ— is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth mercy is sometimes by the Sepâ—uagint rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that signifieth righteousnes agreeable hereunto the Greâ—k word for almes is by the Syriach rendred righteousness the merciful mans bounty is by the Psalmist and St. Paul called righteousnesse yea upon this account mercy and righteousnesse gracious and righteous are joyned together and David promiseth if God would deliver him from blood guiltinesse he would sing aloud of his righteousnesse And now according to this interpretation we see another impulsive cause of forgivenesse namely the grace mercy clemency of God Among others there are two Greek words by which pardon is set forth that excellently confirm this truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former by St. Paul which comming from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to forgive freely and intimateth free grace to be the spring of pardon the latter by the Authour to the Hebrews in that quotation of the Prophet I will be merciful to their sins and their transgressions which is by shewing mercy to the sinner in the forgivenesse of his sins so that we may hence learn to what we are to ascribe the pardon of our sins meerly the good will and grace and mercy of God Indeed we shall still find all those benefits especially spiritual which we receive attributed to mercy the regeneration of our nature according to his mercy he hath begottâ—n us the salvation of our soules according to his mercy he saved us and the remission of our sins through the tender mercy of our God oh let us admire the bowels of love the riches of grace the treasures of mercy which are manifested in pardoning and cleansing our sins 3. But though this interpretation may be received yet since it is a good rule in expounding Scripture to keep to the proper meaning of the words if there be not very good reason to the contrary and there being no reason why we should here recede from I have chosen rather to adhere to the litterall sence of the word Iust. For though it be true that 1. The commission of sin deserveth punishment and therefore justice which giveth every one their due calls for the punishing not the remitting of sin and 2. The confession of sin cannot as hath been before asserted deserve pardon because it is no proportionable compensation of the offence Upon which grounds it appeareth that this justice which forgiveth cannot be in respect of us yet it still is a truth in regard of Christ God is just to forgive so that a Gualtâ—r well he cannot but forgive unlesse he will be unjust to his own Son and inasmuch as our Apostle in the foregoing verse save one expressely attributes this cleansing to Christs blood this interpretation of justice is doubtlesse most genuine and congruous To clear briefly and perspicuously this sweet truth of pardoning justice be pleased to know that 1. The mâ—ledictory sentence of death denounced by the law against sinners was inflicted by God upon Christ this is that which the Prophet Esay positively asserts where he saith the chastisement that is the punishment called a chastisement because inflicted by a father and onely for a time of our peace was upon him and again he was oppressed and he was afflicted which according to the genuine sence of the original is better rendred it was exacted to wit the punishment of our sin and he was afflicted or he answered to wit to the demand of the penalty It may be here enquired how it can stand with Godâ— justice â—o inflâ—ct punishment upon the guiltles and if this doubt be not cleared we shall stumble at the threshold and the foundation of this pardoning justice will be layed in injustice and truly when we find God saying the soul which sinneth shall die and asserting those who condemne the righteous as an abomination to him it is hard to imagin how he can himself justly punish the innocent for the nocent To remove this scruple consider 1. That God did inflict death on Christ is undeniable and who may question the justice of his actions when as things are therefore just because he wills them to be done whose will is the supream rule of justice 2. There cannot be a more necessitating reason of Gods afflâ—cting Christ by death then this so that if it be not just for God to inflict it upon him on this ground it is much lesse upon any other That Christ should die for the confirmation of his doctrine was needless it was done sufficiently by miracles To make way by death to his glory was not necessary he might have been translated as were Enoch and Eliah To dye only as an example of patience and fortitude to his followers is a far less cogent cause then to dye as an example of Gods justice and severity against sin nor need he have died for that end since the death of any of his Apostles might have been exemplary in that kind Finally had he died only for the declaration of Gods immense love to us and not for the demonstration of his severe justice against sin whilest he had been so
loving to us he had been little other then cruâ—l to Christ There wanâ—ed not other wayes to declare his tender affection to mankind but there was no other way to declare his impartial justice against sin so that since the inflicting of death on Christ as a punishment carrieth with it a more urging inducement then any other cause assigned and since the lesse cause there is of inflicting death upon any the greater must needs be the injustice in the inflicter it evidently followeth that there is nothing can so much clear the justice of God in this act as that which the Orthodox asserts to be the cause of it his undergoing the penalty due to our sins 3. But further Christ becoming man is joyned to us in nature and undertaking in our behalf is conjoyned to us by suretiship and in sensu forensi a judicial construction one with us We see in humane Courts the Law taketh as much hold of the surety as of the debtor and why then should it be unjust for God to punish Christ engaging for our debt indeed upon this account the Messiah though innocent became after a sort guilty not as guilt noteth a due deserving of punishment in respect of sin either personally inherent or at least naturally imputed but onely so farre as it noteth an obligation to the punishment in a judicial way as being our surety in which respect that phrase of St. Paul is very apposite he was made sin for us 4. Lastly to put all out of doubt The undergoing this punishment was Christs voluntary Act who as he had power so he wanted not will to lay down his life He was not sent for this end without his own consent as God layed so he took our iniquities upon him the curse to which we were subject saith Theodorus he assumed upon himself of his own accord the death that was not due to him he underwent that we might not undergo that death which was due to us saith S. Gregory he made himself a debtor for us who were debtors and therefore the creditor exacts it from him saith Arnoldus now Volenti non â—it injuria so the moralist most truly if another will voluntarily substitute himself in the room of a malefactor though the inferiour Judge who is bound by the law cannot yet the superiour Governour may without injustice accept of it When therefore God saith the soul that sinneth shall dye he only sets forth the ordinary course of his providence which impedeth not but that Christ being ready to dye in our stead who had sinned God being the supream Ruler and Judge might most justly inflict it on him 2. This punishment thus inflicted on Christ is a plenary satisfaction to Gods justice It is true this word satisfaction is not formally expressed in Scripture yet there are aequivalent phrases such among others is that phrase so often used of redeeming and as if the Holy Ghost would prevent that Socinian Exposition of redimere pro aliquâ— modo liberare redeeming as if it were onely in a large sence no more then delivering it is St. Pauls expresse phrase ye are bought with a price and that this price may appear to be of full value it is opposed to and advanced above corrupt gold and silver by the Apostle Peter nor is it any infringement to the merit of this price and worth of this satisfaction that the suffering of Christ was not every way the same that we should have undergone since it is all one whether the debt be payed in the same coyne or no so it be to the full value Christ suffered the punishment of our sins as Calovius well observeth though not Seâ—undum identitatem omnimodam yet per aequivalentiam the same in every respect yet aequivalent to it Indeed what satisfaction could justice demand more then infinite and the suffering of an infinite person could not be lesse whence followeth 3. In the last place that Gods justice being satisfied for our offences it cannot but remit those offences to us As the creditor cannot demand that of the debtor which the surety hath already payed so neiâ—her can God exact the punishment of us which Christ hath suffered and therefore it is just with him to forgive and cleanse us The case being thus cleared it will be altogether needless to enquire whether it had been injustice in God to forgive without satisfaction St. Austins determination is very solid there wanted not to God another possible way and if it were unjust it were impossible but this of satisfaction was most agreeable to divine wisdom before God did decree this way it might be free to have used it or not but in decreeing this seemed most convenient and after it became necessary so that there can be no remission without it and however it might not have been unjust with God to have forgiven without yet we are sure it is most just with him to forgive upon satisfaction There is onely one objection which remaineth to be answered and it is that which seemeth to carry a great deal of strength in it namely that forgiveness is a free act in God springing from grace and mercy and if it be of grace how can it be of justice that which is of grace is freely done and might justly have been otherwise that which is of justice there is a necessary obligation to the performance of it and what more opposite besides that which addeth the greater force to this argument is that remission and satisfaction are altogether inconsistent A man cannot be said to forgive that debt which he is fully payed so that plenary satisfaction leaveth no place for remission To remove this doubt you must know that things in their own nature opposite may according to different respects concur to the same work and therefore forgivenesse of sin may be an act both of mercy and justice in a several reference In respect of us it is an act of mercy meer mercy and therefore we are said by St. Paul to be justified freely in respect of Christ it is an act of justice and therefore he is said by the same Apostle in the same place to set forth Christ a propitiation to declare his righteousnesse In these different considerations it is that remission and satisfaction are consistent inasmuch as the satisfaction was by Christ not us and the remission is to us not Christ. For the further clearing of this answer be pleased to observe that 1. This satisfaction was neither performed nor procured by us we did not could not do it our selves we did not desire could not obtain it at the hands of Christ it was no other then God himself the injured person who provided and that no other then his own Son to perform this work if a creditor should of his own good will appoint his Son to pay the debt might he not be said to forgive the debtor and would it not be interpreted an act of benignity though
he is an advocate for us with the Father let us be advocates for him with the world let us plead his cause vindicate his honour speak for his Gospel intercede for his members it is but that to which gratitude obligeth to do for him as far as we may what he doth for us and so return like for like indeed he can and will plead his own cause nor doth he stand in need of our help but he taketh it kindly when we expresse our thankefulnesse by becoming advocates for him 3. That when we sin Christ may be our advocate let us be sure to arraign and accuse our selves it is St. Austins advice continually censure and condemn thy self so mayest thou come boldly in confidence of thine advocate Indeed I may here fitly make use of those words towards the end of the former Chapter if we confesse our sinnes he is our advocate to plead for pardon in one word Let us with penitent hearts on all occasions go to him and humbly intreat him that he would intreat for us he desireth no more then to be desired prayer is the only fee this advocate expects Let us therefore confesse and confessing pray to the Father in his name yea to himself that he would pray to the Father and let us not doubt but he will perform what we desire and obtain what we expect the forgivenesse of our sins and not only so but in the end that which is the end of our faith the salvation of our souls THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. II. Ver. 2. And he is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours onely but also for the sins of the whole world IT is one of those excellencies which are common both to Law and Gospel that they require purity of heart and holinesse of life sin not is the voyce both of Moses and Christ Prophets and Apostles Indeed since they were holy men who wrote and that as moved by the Holy Ghost it was impossible but that all their writings should tend to the advancing of holinesse It is one of those excellencies which are peculiar to the Gospel that it provideth an Anchor in case of a storme a rock of succour in shipwrack a refuge whether to flye when we are in danger indeed the Law doometh the transgressour to the curse and there leaveth him hopelesse helplesse remedilesse Accursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the Law to do them so runs the comminatory sentence in which the sinner being involved hath no way left by the Law of escaping but must inevitably perish whence it is that the legal ministration is called by the Apostle the ministration of death but by the Gospel cometh glad tidings of pardon and propitiation to disconsolate sinners and whilest we are sitting in the darknesse of despaire by reason of our sin breaketh in upon us with beams of comfort from the Sun of righteousnesse thus as it saith sin not so withall if we fall into sin it saith despair not a careful endeavour against sin it requireth yet when we have sinned it leaveth us not without hope but directeth us to Christ as an intercessor and reconciler for so we find St. John here in those words which may therefore be truly called the Epitome and summe of the Gospel My little children these things I write unto you c We are now come to the second Ingredient in this Remedy to wit the reconciliation wrought by Christ and this in the second verse and he is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours only but for the sins of the whole world concerning which choice and amiable benefit we have two things set before us The nature of it wherein it consists in those words and he is the propitiation for our sins The extent of it how far it reacheth in those words and not for ours only but for the sins of the whole world each of which may well take up an whole discourse At this time only of the former expressed in those words and he is the propitiation for our sins Before I enter upon the matter it will be needful to take a little notice of the connexion of the clause implied in the particle And. A word which may be considered either meerly as conjunctive or as causal 1. If we read it only as a conjunctive particle it lets us see that Christ being an advocate becometh a propitiation indeed the work of reconciliation according to a different notion belongs both to Christs sacrifice and his intercession the meritorious purchase of our peace belongs to his sacrifice the effectual application of it to us belongs to his intercession the shedding of his blood upon the crosse was that which wrought reconciliation for all that should beleeve in him the presenting his blood in heaven is that which obtaineth the actual collation of this benefit upon them who do beleeve in him This was excellently tipified under the Law by the blood and the incense which the Priest made use of in the attonement the former prefiguring Christs suffering and the latter his advocateship by both which the propitiation is made It is that which we have reason to take notice of for our comfort that Christ is such an advocate as hath not only affectum but effectum a desire to do us good but accomplisheth it as doth not only satagere but efficere undertake but perform as he intercedeth for us when we sin so he finds acceptance and he propitiatâ—th God for our sins oh let it be our wisdom to addresse our selves to him as our advocate when we have offended let us not doubt of being reconciled 2. We may yet further look upon this and as a causal particle signifying after the Hebrew use for and so it lets us see what giveth the efficacy to Christs intercession to wit his propitiation this will the better appear if we consider that 1. This propitiation for our sins was merited by Christs blood and therefore God is said to set him forth a propitiation through faith in his blood and Christ is said to make peace through the blood of his crosse indeed there can be no propitiation of wrath without satisfaction of justice and there can be no satisfaction of justice without shedding of blood whereby the punishment was suffered which justice required 2. Christ maketh intercession in the vertue of his blood our salvation is obtained first pretio and then prece by laying down a price and then pleadâ—ng the payment before God so that what was once offered is continually presented 3. Christ being a propitiation and so our advocate must needs speed whilest a man is angry it is in vain to move him for a favour but his anger being appeased there is hopes of successe especially when he pleads who was the means to pacifie him thus stands the case between God and Christ and us God being â—ncensed
stone is one and very apt to our present purpose Since as in respect of Satan He is lapis triumphalis a stone of victory and triumph dashing that Goliah in the forehead so in respect of God he is lapis foedificus a stone of league and amity such as that between Laban and Iacob or rather lapis angularis a corner stone for as this uniteth the walâ— which were one seperate from the other together so doth he unite and that not onely Iewes and Gentiles to one another but both to God This is that truth which the Apostle Paul planly asserts in those Scriptures which speak of reconciliation to God thus he saith God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe and again Christ is said to reconcile both to wit Jew and Gentile unto God in one body by the crosse and againe It pleased the Father by him having made peace through the bloud of his crosse to roconcile all things to himselfe It would not be passed by what is by Socinians objected against these Scriptures that they speake onely of our being reconciled to God not of Gods being reconciled to us and so prove not any pacification of divine wrath by Christs death whence it is that they understand this reconciling of us to God to be no more then the turning of us from sin to God by true repentance But to vindicate this great truth and that as asserted in those Scriptures be pleased to consider briefly that Though the phrase onely run in this straine the reconciling us to God yet it doth not therefore follow that the reconciliation is onely on our part and not on Gods nay rather the one involveth the othâ—r since if we were not sinners there were no need of reconciling us to God and being sinners there is no lesse need of his being reconciled to us unlesse we will say that sin doth not provoke him which is to deny him to be a God And though this reconciliation being mutuall doth no lesse imply Gods to us then ours to him yet it is very fitly thus expressed because God is the pars offensa the party offended and man is pars offendens the party offending he that offendeth another is more properly said to be reconciled to him whom he hath injured then he that is offended in which respect Christ adviseth him who bringeth his gift to the altar If he remember his brother have ought against him to go and be reconciled to his brother and St. Paul wisheth the woman that departeth to be reconciled to her husband as having by departing offended him But as the reconcililing of a woman to her husband a trespasser to his brother is the paâ—ifâ—ing the one of her husbands anger the other of his brothers displeasure justly conceived against them so the reconciling us to God is the appeasing of his wrath towards us which for our sins was incensed against us And that this is St. Pauls meaning appeareth plainly in one of those forecited places where the manner how God in Christ reconcileth us to himselfe is expressed to be his not imputing our trespasses and Christ in whom we are thus reconciled is said to do it by being made sin for us It is not therefore our turning from sin to God but Christ becomming a sacrifice for our sins and Gods not imputing our sins to us for his sake which is our reconciltation to God and inasmuch as it is God who being offended receiveth us againe into favour therefore it is ascribed to him as his act and because it is Christ who hath by his death appeased Gods anger therefore it is attributed to him and so the cleare meaning of our Apostle appeareth to be the same with that which here S. Iohn asserts and intends when he saith of Christ He is the propitiation for our sins And because the Socinians being resolved to make all Scripture stoop to their reason endeavour to pervert this text as if it were onely a delivering us from the wrath to come upon impenitents by turning us from our sins Give me leave to set before you the genuine sence of this word which our Apostle here useth and that both in its native signification and legall allusion 1. If we consider this word in its native signification we shall find that the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Text commeth in all writers both sacred and prophane Poets Oratours Historians as the learned Grotius hath observed signifieth to appease or pacify or render propitious and is usually construed with an accusative expressing the person whose anger is pacified Indeed there is one place in the Hebrewes where being joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the plurall accusative it is rendred to expiate the sins of the people but either the use of the word there must be altogether different from its sence of perpetuall signification or it must signify such an expiation as tends to a pacification so it is all one whether you read it here He is the expiation or He is the propitiation since the one depends on the other and by expiating our sins it is that He propitiateth God towards us 2. If we consider this word in its legall allusion we shall find a double reference which may be made of it 1. To the mercy-seat which covered the arke where the law was whence God gave answers and from which he shewed himselfe propitious to the people whereof we read in the booke of Exodus Hence the Seventy and the Authâ—r to the Hebrews from thence cal it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a propitiatory to this the Apostle Paul manifestly alludeth where the very same word is used when he saith Him hath God set forth a propitiation and possibly St. John in this word might have the same reference Indeed Christ may well be called the propitiatory or a propitiation in allusion to the mercy-seat since there is a fit analogy between them For as it covered the Law so Christ the transgressions of the Law as thence God gave answers so by Christ his Evangelical Oracles are revealed and as from thence God shewed himselfe propicious so is he in Christ well pleased but in this last analogy in which respect it was called a propitiatory and serveth to our present purpose though there is a fitnesse yet not a fulness for whereas the mercy-seat is called the propitiatory onely because it had vim declarativam a declarative vertue to signify Christ is the propitiation as having vim effectivam an operative energy to procure divine favour and therefore was God pleased to manifest himselfe benevolous from the mercy-seat because it was a type of Christ in whom he is propitiated towards sinners In vaine therefore do the Socinians confine the antitype to the type as if that Christ must be in no other sense a propitiation then the mercy-seat was since it is sufficient to make a type
that there be in some things a similitude though not in all things an aequality nor is it any wonder if there be more energy in the body then in the shadow since the shadow is but a resemblance of the body 2 Besides this allusion which no doubt is most congruous to S. Pauls phrase there is another more suitable to this of S. John and that is in reference to the Sacrifices of expiation attonement Almighty God in the Law appointed both the burnt-offering for sin in generall and trespasse-offerings for particular sins by which being offered up he became appeased towards the sinner Now all those Sacrifices did look at Christ and the attonement which was made by them was not as considered in themselves but as they did typify Christs death and the propitiation to be wrought by it That those sacrifices did all of them typify Christ seemeth to me an undoubted truth and that among others for this reason because by Christs death they were abolished and became mortua dead yea soon after mortifera not onely dead but deadly upon this account that to continue those Sacrifices was to deny Christ. That whatsoever efficacy those Sacrifices had towards attonement was onely in reference to Christ must needs follow upon the former since as when the antitype is accomplished the type ceaseth so the vigour of the type whilest inbeing is from its relation to the antitype in this respect it is that under the legall administrations the people offering Sacrifices were minded of Christ and beleeving in him and God was propitiated by those Sacrifices as they did prefigure and so as it were mind him of Christ to be offerred up a reall and effectuall propitiation To close up this it would not be passed by how emphaticall our Apostles expression is in that he doth not onely say of Christ he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a propitiatour but the propitiation it selfe that is victima 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the propitiatory Sacrifice Indeed he is both the Priest and the Sacrifice rhe propitiator and the propitiation according to which is that of Origen God hath set him forth a propitiation through faith in his blood that by the Sacrifice of his body he might render God propitious to men In one word to speak after the Schooles inasmuch as Christ by his death did removere peccatum take away the guilt of sin which causeth the enmity and offerre sacrificium Deo acceptissimum offer up a sacrifice most grateful to God he might be truly said to be the propitiation There is only one objection which carrieth in it a shew of reason and therefore calls for a solution It is drawn from those Scriptures in which Gods love to mankind is set down as the cause of sending Christ into the world whereas if Christs coming into the world to dye did propitiate God for our sins this love of his towards man should be the effect not the cause and those Scriptures should have run thus not God so loved the world that he sent but God sent his Son into the world that he might love it and not in this was the love of God manifested but by this was the love of God procured to wit the sending his only begotten Son To untye this knot you may please to know that these two assertions are not irreconcileable Gods love to us moved him to send Christ to dye Christs dying moveth him to love us Indeed the love of God to man is in one respect the cause and in another the effect of Christs death and that thus it appeared to St. John is plain in that he puts these two together in one verse he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins To clear the truth hereof briefly observe these distinctions 1. Man fallen is to be considered say the Schooles two wayes either quantum ad naturam or quantum ad culpam as made by God or marr'd by sin he loved us as the work of his hands and that love was the cause of sending Christ he hated us as transgressours of his Law and Christ by making satisfaction removeth that hatred and obtaineth his favour 2. There is a twofold love of God towards man The one of commiseration and benevolence whereby he was reconcileable yea himself appointed the way of reconciliation and this love was the cause of Christs death The other of friendship or complacency whereby he becomes actually reconciled and so conferreth all good upon us and this love is the effect of Christs death It is observable concerning the friends of Job that God said to them My wrath is kindled against you therefore take seven bullocks and seven rams and go to my servant Job and offer up for your selves a burnt-offering and my servant Job shall pray for you for him will I accept wherein it appeareth God so far tendred them as to acquaint them with his wrath and the meanes of pacifying it but his wrath was not removed till those meanes were used An enemy may so far love as to propose and offer conditions of peace to his adversary but till those conditions be accomplished and performed there is no amity between them so is it in this case though God loved us so as to propose nay indeed to perfect the meanes of reconciliation yet still he is not actually reconciled to us but only in and by those means the chief whereof is Christs passion The summe of all then amounts to this God considered without respect to Christ was though iratus yet placabilis actually angry yet so as that there was a possibility of appeasing it he was not so far provoked with men as with the Angels for whom he would not appoint nor accept a ransom but still it is only in and through Christ that he becometh placatus actually appeased toward sinners 2. He only is the propitiation for our sins only Moses must go up to God in the mount none but the High Priest must enter with the blood into the holy of holies Christ alone must mediate with God for man Indeed there was not could not be found in heaven or earth any one fit or able to undertake this work This will the better appear if we consider that whosoever would become a propitiation for our sins must both be free himself from all sin and be both capable and able to undergoe the punishment of our sins 1. He must be free from sin and therefore we could not propitiate God for our selves can it be imagined a Rebâ—ll should pacify the King towards himself or fellow-rebels whatever we could do whilest in our sins were but evaginato gladio pacem peterâ— seeking for peace with a drawne sword in our hand against our Soveraign indeed the good works of them that are in Christ do placere but not pacare please not appease and that only as dyed in Christs blood but as we are in a
state of sin nothing we do can please much lesse pacify he Almighty The truth is to use Ferus his similitude All the works we do are in themselves but as a ring of iron and could not so much as gain acceptance were it not for faith which sets into them as it were the precious gemme of Christs merits 2. He must be capable and able to bear the punishment of our sins There can be no propitiation for without expiation of sin the expiation of sin is by suffering the punishment and the sin being committed against an infinite Majesty the suffering by which it is expiated must be of infinite value in these respects it is impossible that any or all the Angels though holy and just should propitiate God for out sins since as Angels they were not capable of the punishment and though they should have assumed humane nature yet being but finite creatures the worth of their sufferings could not be infinite only Christ in himself being altogether pure and therefore called Iesus Christ the righteous in the end of the former verse and being both God and man and so able as God and capable as man of undergoing such a penalty as should by reason of the infiniteness of his person be of infinite merit is the propitiation for our sins To end this The propitiation here spoken of may be considered several wayes and accordingly it may have several causes as decreed published applyed purchased The decree and intention of this propitiation is the work of the whole Trinity though especially attributed to the Father The declaring and publication of it is the work of Christs Ministers to whom is committed the word of reconciliation The effectual application of it to every one in particular is done principally by the Spirit and instrumentally by faith But still the purchase and procuration of it is only by the blood of Christ nemo praeter illum nemo cum illo there was none besides him there was none to joynâ— with him he alone did undertake and accomplish the work of reconciliation Having briefly and I trust in some measure clearly explicated the explicite truth of this clause give me leave in a few words to apply it 1. In the sense of Gods wrath for our sins whither should we go but to Christ for reconciliation far be it from us to think we can pacify God for our sins by our prayers or teares or almes in all which Gods severe eye of justice would find matter of provocation far be it from us to place our hopes of Gods favour towards us in the merits and mediation of Saints or Angels who themselves are beholding to this Mediatour the truth is Propter filii meritum mater invenit gratiam The Mothers peace was made by the Sonnes blood and therefore to him and him alone let us have recourse as our only Peace-maker And would you know how to go to him I answer by faith accedit qui credit he cometh to who beleeveth on Christ and as there is no propitiation but through him so there is no propitiation through him to us but by laying hold on him in which respect the Apostle doth not only say God hath set forth Christ a propitiation through his blood but through faith in his blood and therefore being sensible of divine pleasure let us embrace Christ in the armes of our faith that God for his sake may be propitious to us 2. In the confidence of this propitiation wrought for us by Christ how infinitely should we account our selves obliged to our blessed Jesus the more to imprint this meditation upon us consider 1. What the benefit is which Christ hath procured propitiation for our sins a benefit which hath many blessings to attend upon it such as are acceptation of our persons and performances nearnesse of union and fulnesse of communion with God boldnesse of accesse to the throne of Grace peace of conscience and joy in the Holy Ghost Christ saith to every beleeving soul that hath an interest in his propitiation in words much like those to his disciples Be of good cheer I have pacified the Fathers wrath towards thee God saith to every such person for whom he hath accepted Christs propitiation in words much like those to Ephraim It is my dear Son it is my pleasant child though I spake against thee I do earnestly remember thee I will surely have mercy on thee and 2. Who are we for whom Christ vouchsafed to become a propitiation Jonathan stood between Sauls fury and David a good reason Sauls rage was causelesse David was innocent but Gods anger was just and we were offenders the people mediated between Saul and Ionathan when he tasted of the honey but Ionathan had offended ignorantly we have been wilful presumptuous Rebels Abigail pacified Davids wrath against Nabal but he was her husband Hester diverteth Ahasucrus his rage from the Iewes but they were her countreymen but loe Christ becometh a propitiation for our sinnes who were strangers not allies enemies not friends enemies to him as well as the Father and yet for our sins he propitiateth 3. When there was no other way left of propitiation he undertaketh it I looked saith Christ and there was none to help I wondred that there was none to uphold therefore mine own arm brought salvation If all those glorious Angels had with united endeavours sought to reconcile God to man it could not have been accomplished As God faith in another case Though these three men Noah Daniel and Iob were in the land they should deliver but their own soules they shall deliver neither sonnes nor daughters so he seemed to say in this Though Gabriel Michael yea all the Myriads of Angels had not only intreated but in assumed bodies suffered they should not have propitiated my wrath towards one man for the least sin And as Elishah said to Ahab Were it not that I regard the presence of Iehoshaphat I would not look towards thee nor see thee so God saith to us Were it not that I regard the passion and intercession of my Son I would not vouchsafe the least look of grace or favour towards you 4. That Christ might be the propitiation for our sinnes he was pleased to offer himself a sacrifice our blessed Saviour appearing to his disciples after his resurrection Said Peace be to you and shewed them his hands and his feet as if he would say See how dear your peace cost me Thus the case stood we had offended God was provoked wrath was ready to strike us Christ steps in and taketh the blow upon himself and so by his suffering God is pacified towards us And now putting all these together that when none could Christ would and that undertake so great a work as the reconciling offended justice and when no other means would prevaile but blood and death Christ should be willing to lay down his own life and this for our sinnes who were so
from Gods pleasure not any want of dignity and sufficiency in the price which was payed by him 2 But when the schooles speak of Christs dying for all sufficiently and accordingly some Expositours interpret this expiation sufficient for the sins of the whole world it is as the Learned Davenant hath excellently observed solidly proved another kind of value to wit such as ariseth from divine ordination and thus though we must exclude Angels and consider men onely as viatores whilest they are in the way since as S. Bernard truly The blood of Christ which was shed on earth goeth not down to hell yet we are by the whole world to understand omnes singulos all and every man that hath been is or shall be in the world so that we may truly assert It was the intention of God giving Christ and Christ offering himselfe to lay down such a price as might be sufficient and so upon Gospel termes applicable to all mankind and every individuall man in the whole world To unfold this truth aright I shall briefly present two things to your consideration 1. A price may be said to be sufficient either absolutely or conditionally a price is then absolutely sufficient when there is nothing more required to the participation of the benefit but onely the payment of the money and thus we are not to conceive of Gods ordination that Christs death should become an actuall propitiation without any other intervenient act on our part He dyed not in this sense for any much lesse for all when therefore we say God would that Chrâ—st should lay down a prâ—ce sufficient and so applicable to every man it is to be understood in a conditionall way upon the termes of faith and repentance And hence it is that though Christ dying suffered that punishment which was designed to be satisfactory for the sins of every man yet God doth justly inflict the punishment upon the persons of all them who are not by faith partakers of Christs death because it was intended to satisfy for them onely upon condâ—tion of beleeving 2. Know further that though God intend Christs propitiation conditionally applâ—cable aequè as well to every as any man yet he did not ex aequo aequally intend it for every man it is one thing to say He is a propitiation not for our sins onely but for the sins of the whole world and another thing to say He is a propitiation as fully for the sins of the whole world as He is for ours It is observable in Scripture that some places speake of Christ laying down his life for his sheep and giving himselfe for his Church and others of Christs dying for all and tasting death for every one in one place He is called the Saviour of the body and in another the Saviour of the world nor will it be hard to reconcile these if we distinguish of a general a speciall intention in God that the fruit of his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 love to mankind this of his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 good will to some particular persons by the former he intends Christs propitiation applicable to all by the latter He decreth it to be actually applyed to some according to this it is that S. Ambrose saith Christ suffered generally for all and yet specially for some and Peter Lumbard Christ offered himselfe on the Altar of the Crosse for all as to the sufficiency of the price for the elect onely as to efficacy because he efâ—ects salvation onely for them that are praedestinaâ—ed Sutably hereunto it is â—hat Divinâ—s conceive a double covenant to be intimated iâ— Scripture the one universall and condâ—tionall the other speciall and absolute the one made with all and every man upon these termes Whosoever beleeveth in Christ shall not perish the other made with Christ concerning a seed which He should see upon makâ—ng hâ—s Soule an offering for â—in to whom He promiseth not onely Salvation by Christ upon condition of beleeving but the writing his law in their hearts whereby they are inabled to performe the condition and so infalâ—â—by pertake of that salvation By all which it appeareth that notwithstanding Gods speciall affection and dâ—crâ—e of election whereby he hath purposed this propitiation shall be actually conferd upon some we may tâ—uly assert God hath a generall love whereby He hath ordained the death of Christ an universall remedy applicable to every man as a propitiation for his sins â—f he beleeve and repent And hence it is that this propitiation as it it is applicable so it is annunciable to every man Indeed as God hath not intended it should be actually applyed so neither that it should be so much as aâ—â—ually revealed to many men but yet it is as applicable so annunciâ—ble both by virtue of the generall covenant God hath made with all and that generall mandate He hath given to his Ministers of preaching the Gospel to all so that if any Minister could go through all the parts of the world and in those parts singly from man to man He might not onely with a conjectural hope but with a certain faith say to him God hath so loved thee that he gave his onely son that if thou beleeve in him thou shalt not perish and that this is not barely founded upon the innate sufficiency of Christs death but the Ordination of God appeareth in that we cannot may not say so to any of the fallen Angels for whom yet as you have already heard Christs death is intrinsecally sufficient And now what should the meditation of this truth afford us but matter of 1 Admiration at the riches of divine love to all mankind and which rendereth it so much the more wonderfull that whilest it is conferd on the whole world of men it is denied to Angels That God should cause his wrath to smoake against those spiritual and noble creatures the Angels and appoint a propitiation a ransome for such crawling wormes sinful dust and ashes as men are is it not to be admired at St. Ambrose speaking of these words the whole earth is full of thy mercy puts the question Why is it not said the heaven as well as the earth and returneth this Answer because there are indeed spiritual wickednesses in high places sed non illae ad commune jus indulgentia Dei remissionemque pertinent peccatorum but the remission of God and propitiation of Christ belongs not to them well may we in this consideration take up those words of the Psalmist quoted by the Authour to the Hebrewes upon this very occasion Lord what is man that thou art so mindful of him and the Son of man that thou visitest him 2. Consolation to all despairing soules it is an excellent saying of Leo The effusion of Christs blood is so rich and availeable that if the whole multitude of captive sinners would beleeve in their Redeemer not one should be detained in the tyrants chaines
Who art thou then that sayest Christ dyed not for thee and will not be a propitiation for thy sins when the doore is open by God why should it be shut by thee when God is ready to receive thee why shouldest thou reject Christ and cast away thy self view the Text well and tell me if the whole world do not include thee surely omne totum continet suas partes omnis species sua individua every species includeth its individuals every whole its parts it is both Calvins and Gualters note upon the word world that it is so often repeated ne aliquem à Christi merito exclusum puâ—aremus so Gualter that we should not think any one excepted ne quis omnino arceri se putet modo â—idei viam teneat so Calvin lest any one should think himself excluded if he walk in the path of beleeving Beleeve it never any missed of propitiation for want of merit in Christ but of faith in themselves why should I give my self over when my Physician doth not so long as I am one of the whole world and my particular sins are not so great as the sins of the whole world I will not cast away all hopes of propitiation 3. Caution that we do not hence presume of a propitiation without application St. John saith he is the propitiation for our sins and for the sins of the whole world but we cannot inferre he is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world therefore he will be for ours though we live as we list Alas brethren you have already heard this propitiation as it is universal so it is conditional habet quidâ—m in se ut omnibus pro sit sed si non bibitur non medetur this cup of salvation hath that in it which can benefit all but if no drinking of it no healing by it If thou dost not beleeve saith St. Ambrose Christ did not descend for thee nor dye for thee to wit so as effectually to save thee and in another place more aptly to our present purpose if any one doth not beleeve he defraudeth himself of that benefit which is so generall indeed by reason of this condition it falls out that though Christ be a propitiation for the sins of the whole world yet it is not the whole world no nor the greater no nor an equall part of the world but a third a fourth part a remnant a little flock partake of this propitiation and therefore we have a great deal of reason to fear and tremble lest we miscarry and have no share in this propitiation which is so universal 4. Exhortation that since Christ is a propitiation for the whole world we labour to make sure our own share in this universal good it had been little comfort to St. Iohn that he could say Christ is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world if he could not have said he is the propitiation for our sins that known saying is in this case too often verified later dolus in universalibus men deceive themselves whilest they rest in generalities content not thy self to know that Christ hath dyed for the world but strive to be assured that thou shalt be saved by his death it will be a sad trouble at that day for thee to think I had a price in my hand but I made no use of it I might have obtained propitiation by Christ but I neglected it there was a remedy prepared but I contemned it And therefore let our great care be to gain an interest in assurance of this propâ—tiation to our own soules that what it is in it self it may be to us and it may be for our sins efficiently what it is sufficiently not for ours onely but for the sinnes of the whole world FINIS A TABLE of the materiall Truths in this Treatise A. ADvocate How affirmed of Christ how of the Holy Ghost 351. how Christs Advocateship differs from his Mediatorship 352. He the onely Advocate 363. wherein it consists 354. with whom he is an Advocate 356. what giveth efficacy to it 357 369. he is no Patron of sin though advocate for sinners 353. he is no Advocate for them that continue in sin 346.347 we must be advocates for Christ. 365 Afflictions compared to darknesse 151 152. Christians rejoyce in them 110. the Word of God comforts in them 118 for sin inflicted even on forgiven persons 294. Ambition spiritual commendable 192. Angels Christs death in some sense suffiâ—ient to redeem the fallen Angels 397. yet not applicable to them 400. Anger Gods how terrible 371. sin the cause of it 369 370. Antiquity a note of verity 80. what kind of Antiquity is so 81 82. Apostles the meannesse of their outward condition 133. their integrity and unblameableness 71. Christs witnesses 21. their continual converse with him 64 65 66. why needfull 67 68. B. BLood of Christ how taken in Scripture 205. how often shed 206. how it cleanseth from sin 207 208. C. CHildren Regenerate persons must be as such 327. they must reverence their parents 330. Christ. Why called the Word 37 38 39 40. The subject of the whole Scripture 42. how the life the eternal life 44 45 46 His eternal subsistence from the beginning 53 76. Truly man 68. God and man in one person 69 212. How he was visible 67. His excellent preaching 64. His unspeakable dignity 6â— His fitnesse for the work of our Redemption 54. promised before sent 43. our miserable condition without him 46 391. In what respects said to be righteoue 395. The onely Refuge of a wounded conscience 350. The Parable between him and the Mercy-Seat 375. His great love to sinners 215. No fellowshâ—p with God but through him 98. no salvation but through him 388. Christians their dignity 102. their charity in desiring others may partake with them 86 87.385 what is done to them reflects on Christ. 101. Christ to be manifested in their lives 60. Church the Christian in it self a great multitude 393.395 Civility how differenced from sanctity 182 183. Cleansing from sin twofold 27 28. the causes of it 208. Commandments of God joyned with promises 131. how conversant about things impossible 228. many think they keep them all 252. Communion with God and Christ and the Saints see fellowshâ—p Confession threefold 264. of sin necessary to remission and how 280 281 282. it brings glory to God 285. benefit to us 283. The devil an enemy to it 285. it must be particular 266 267 chiefly of our ouwn sins 269. to whom to be made 271 272. its antecedent ingredients consequent 273 274 275. to be performed by the Holiest 227. Conversion maketh an alteration 192 192. others must be desired by us 87. Conversation of Christians ought to be exemplary 179. Covenant of Grace double one general the other special 399. D. DArkness fourfold 150. Death of Christ in our stead for our sins our dischrge 209 210. what gave the merit to iâ— 213 214. no benefit by
it to wicked men 219. Deceive Man apt to deceive himself 246. the more need to wheare of it 253 254. there are many deceâ—vers 246. Despair Antidotes against it Christs blood two 216 217. his Avocateship 360 361. his propitiation 381. especially the undversality of it 400. despaire and presumpt on two dangeroâ—us rocks 344. E. EPistles their use 12. Exordium's the properties of them 18. Excuse men apt to make for their sins 268. by transferring the fault on others 269. the sins of the godly no excuse for the wicked 276 237. F. FAlls Saints nay fall grossely 347. fear of falling a preservative 348. Father when applied to God how taken 50. how God is our Father and how Christs 357. Fathers love to their children 333 357. Faith the Christians spiritual sense 74. the means of fellowship with God 85. it applieth but doth not appropriate Christ. 38 no salvation but by faith in Christ. 389 390. greatly oppugned by the devil 126. it is neither unmannerly nor uncharitable 386. the only instrument of pardon 281. Faithfulness Gods in performing his promises 310 311. ground of faith 313. mans required in imitation of Gods 312. Fellowship between Saints 83. with God and Christ wherein it consists 91 92 93. we may have it as well as the Apostles 84. how with the Father 94. how with Christ. 95 96 97. earnestly to be desired 109. the difficulty of attaining it 197. impossible to men continuing in their sins 167. Forgiveness of sin the nature of it 292 293. why called cleansing 296 297. Gods prerogative 304.305 306. Gods faithfulnesse obligeth him to it 312 314. It is just with God to forgive sin and how 316 317. mercy the impulsive cause in respect of us 315. it is onely of sin past 299. it s universal extent 300 301. how consistent with afflictions for sin 294 295. how differâ—nt from forbearing 293. earnestly to be longed after 298. mans required in imitation of Gods 308 309. Forsaking sin to be joyned with confession 275 276. The truest part of repentance 335. how far it is required 337. G. GEntiles as well as Jewes capable of the mâ—rit of Christs death 393 394. Gnosticks their impurity 167. their pretences of purity 245. God all good in him 111 112. why compared to light 137 138. how manifesting himself in the incarnation 58. no authour of sin 142 144. Gospel why called the Word of life 30 31. its excellency above the law 33.129 366. accidentally the savour of death 34. chiefly promissory 129. a doctrine of joy 115. its Antiquity 78 79. its doctrines made by wicked men incouragements to sin 340. whereas they are arguments against sin 341. though a refuge when we have sinned 366. Grace the difference between sincere and counterfeit grace 182 183. see holinesse H. HEathen their condition to be pitied 392. Hide our sins from God we cannot 265. Holiness Gods why compared to light 139 140. all holinesse from him 141.187 mans holinesse why resembled by light and by what light 181 182. how it fits for fellowship with God 198. Humility maketh men low-conceited of themselves 249. she remainders of sin in us should make us humble 238. Hypocrites the worst of sinners 148. sharply to be reproved 149. they are best conceited of themselves 148. they say they have no sin 244 245. they pretend to fellowship with God 163 164. the most miserable men 175. the contrariety of their conversation to their profession 172. I. IEsuites their Arrogancy in assuming that title to themselves 95. Ignorance compared to darknesse 151. affected damnable 170. Image of God what it is 92. Imitation of God required 189 190. Incarnation why called a manifestation 55 56. why the second person incarnate 57. Infidelity it maketh God a lyar 360. Infirmities to be altogether without them the priviledge of heaven 228 229.349 they accompany our best duties 234 235 236. they hinder not fellowship with God 218. they ought to be bewayled 350. but yet must not too much discourage us 239. John his humility 9. prudence 10. innocency 11. his first Epistle the scope of it 2 3 124 125. the comprehensiveness of it 4 5 6 7. why cvlled Cathalick 14 15 16. Joy it is that which all men seek after 106. Christianity doth not abolish it 113. the difference between worldly and spiritual joy 108 109 110. Spiritual joy is fixed on God and Christ. 107 111 it supports in all afflictions 110. Judge how Christ both Iudge and Advocate 352. we must nat judge according to outward shewes 165. our owne frailties should make us judge charitably of others 238 239 348. Justice of God appeareâ—h both in forgiving penitents and punishing of the impenitent 322 323. Justification and sanctification inseparable 290. Justiciaries their self-conceit 244.245 the causes of it 251 252. K. KNowledg not avayleable without practice 185 it must be communicated to others 24. of God how to be attained 143. of sin an antecedent to confession 273. L. LIfe Eternall to be sought after 4. how great the joy of it 112 113. in what respects through Christ. 45. Light threefold 180. Love of God to man threefold 377 378. Lie wicked men fasten on God 255. hypocrisie a reall lie 172 two things concurre to a lye 166.169 three sorts of lies 173. M. MEan things made choyce of to be Christs instruments and why 133.134 Mediatorship onely belonging to Christ. 98.99 how different from his Advocateship 352.353 Men ranked into two sorts 196. Metaphors must be familiar 135 136. Ministers must be sent 25. they must be assured of the truth of what they deliver 73. what they declare to others must be received from Christ. 132. they must give every one their due 137 138. their language must be plain 39. their aime is to beat down sin 338. they must use mildnesse in their instructions 333.334 fathers to the people and how 328. their great love to the people 331 332. their care of and joy in the peoples welfare 119 120 123. they must seek the peoples benefit 85 86. to be honoured and reverenced and obeyed 32 330 331 how far confession to be made to them 271. what their power in forgiving 307. Morality how different from Sanctity 182.183 N. NAme it is prudence sometimes to conceale it 10. O. OBedience the properties of it represented by walking 184. Omniscency Gods attribute 138. Originall sin remaining in the best 231 232. P. PApists we dare vie with them in the point of antiquity 82. Pardon of sin see forgivenesse Precepts See commandements Presumption the grounds of it 162. the difference between presumptuous sinners and weake Saints 262. Christs universall propitiation no just cause of it 401. Pride Spirituall what should abase it 103. Profession without practise a lye 170.173 the loose conversation of professors how great a dishonour to God Religion and injurie to themselves 174 175. Promises their worth 130. benefit 43 303. free and yet conditional 130. Punishment of the guiltlesse how consistent with Gods justice 316
his mercy in a word the designe of these precepts is to teach us what we ought not what we can to set the marke before us which we must shoot at though we cannot reach to it till we come to Heaven And therefore 2. Voluntate decreti Gods decree is that we shall gradually come to perfection and here indeavouring to attaine hereafter attain what we indeavour To this purpose it is that the Church which Christ is said to present to himselfe not having spot or wrinckle is called a glorious Church to intimate saith Chemnitius excellently That then and not till then the Church shall be without spot when she is glorious and that is when it shall be tâ—iumphant and appeare with him in glory 4. This impeccability is not denyed as that which might not have been but as that which supposing Gods councel cannot be S. Austin moveth the question whether it be possible for a man assisted by grace to be without sin and resolveth it affirmatively nor can it be gainsayed but that if God had so pleased he might have restored his Image to man perfectly at his first conversion or he might have conferred such extraordinary grace as a pecuilar priviledge upon some particular men whereby they should have been free from all sin God neither hath commanded any thing which was impossible in it selfe for man to do nor is it impossible for God to assist a man fully to performe what he commands but what need we dispute of Gods power when we know his purpose divine decree hath placed impeccability beyond the reach of any meer man in this life there cannot be any one named that hath been and we may surely conclude there never will be any one on whom such a praerogative shal be conferred From hence S. Ierome hath wel reasoned against Pelagius It is in vaine to assert such a power which never is reduced into act and to say a man may do that which yet no man could ever do yea as he doth to say a man might be without sin if he would when the blessed Apostle cryeth out The good I would do I do not and the evâ—ll I would not do I do is foolish and absurd yea hereticall and impious 5. There is a great deale of difference between these two phrases Habere peccatum Haberi a peccato to have sin and to be had by sin to the one is required onely the presence to the other the domâ—nion of sin There are many that can say nay all truly regenerate persons may say they are not had by and under the possession of sin but yet they cannot say they have no sin remayning in them the weakest Christian is not under the raigne and the strongest is not without the being of sin aliud est non habere peccatum aliud non obedire desideriis it is one thing not to have sin and another not to obey sin He that obeyeth any sin and yet saith he is a saint deceiveth himselfe and he that is a saint should he say he had no sin would but deceive himselfe likewise 6. It is not a possibility of freedome from grosse scandalous enormous sins which is here denyed but from any sin whatsoever St. Gregory maketh a distinction between crimen and peccatum that though every crime is a sin yet every sin is not a crime and proportionably many in this life are without crime but not without sin To the same purpose St. Ierome asserts that a man may be without that which the Greeks call malitious wickednesse and yet not free from sinful spots and not much unlike St. Austin where he saith It is one thing to be without sin and a-another to be without blam We may read of men without crime without blame but of none without sin It is the Apostles councell to the Philippians that they should be harmless without rebuke and accordingly it is said of Zachary and Elizabeth that they walked in all the commandements of the Lord blameless and no doubt there are many godly men who lead such lives that the world cannot taxe them nor they themselves with any known grosse wickednesse but still they want not infirmities cleaving to them When therefore St. Paul saith of the Saints that they are free from sin it is an inchoate not a consummate liberty and a freeedome from great not all sins as St. Austin appositely the truth is to be without sin is the holynesse of Heaven to be without grosse sin the holynesse of earth 7. It is not a possibility of freedome from this or that particular sin but from all sin that is here denyed There are severall sins which godly men may say they have not nay there is not any one particular great sin which a man may not through divine assistance be able to avoid but to say We have no sin at all in no kind nor respect were arrogancy in the holyest person this is the position of that great schooleman A man may shun any sin in particular but not sin in generall and his instance excellently illustrateth it If there be an 100 leakes in a ship it is easy to stop any one of them but difficult to stop them all we may be in a great measure and in many respects but not in all free from sin till the resurrection of the flesh 8. Lastly these two expressions the one of havâ—ng sin the other of having sinned are not improbably referd by interpreters the one to originall and the other to actuall sins and accordingly I shall demonstrate the truth of this doctrine in respect of both 1. If we say we have no sin that is no originall sin remaining in us we deceive our selves That our Apostle here intends originall sin is probable because he useth the singular number sin not sins as if it were some special sin he pointed at and likewise because of the phrase of having which intimateth that he speaketh of that sin which is as it were habitual and innate in us It is not unworthy our observation that Christ speaking to his own Disciples calls them evill and St. Hilaries note upon it is that the reason of this appellation was in respect of that common staine of naturall corruption which did still adhere to them Indeed we all bringing sin with us into the world cannot be without it whilest we are in the world it is the Apostles expression that we must be renewed dayly and it is St. Austins glosse that therefore we are but in part renewed and so the old man is still abâ—ding in us Indeed according to that known elegant expression of St. Bernard this sin is weakned but not plucked up cast down but not cast out subjugated but not extirpated in the best of Gods saints Hence the dolefull sigh and sorrowful complaint of the holy Apostle Oh wretched man that I am who shal deliver mee from this body of death knowing saith that devout
Father that he should not be loosed from the root of bitternesse law of sin till he was loosed from his body nor could this sin which separateth between God and us be separated from him till his soule was separated from his body It may be here objected what is by the Romanists asserted that concupiscence in the regenerate is no sin and so though they have concupiscence yet not therefore sin to insist upon this controversie would be a digression it is enough that whilest they only account it paenam and fomitem a punishment of sin and as it were the fuell of sin St. Paul no lesse then fourteen times calleth it by the name of sin in the 6.7 and 8. chapters to the Romanes It may perhaps further be objâ—cted what is generally agreed to that baptisme be coming an instrument of regeneration washeth away original sin therefore why may not regenerate baptized persons say they have no original sin But the schools answer to this objection is very ful that Sacraments are administred to the person therfore the person is free from the guilt whilest yet stil the nature is defiled with the stain of original sin whereas it may be retorted that if the sin remaine the guilt cannot be abolâ—shed guiltiness being an inseperable adjunct of sin I answer that the â—eatus simplex guilt abstractively considered is not taken away but as redundans in personam concretively considered it is taken away so that this guilt shall not be imputed to the person whilest yet there are some remainders of the sin in him so that he cannot say truly he hath no sin to wit no originall corruption 2. If we say we have not sinned by actual transgressions we deceive our selves that expression of the prophet upon the land of my people shal come up briars thornes is not unfitly moralized by St. Gregory to this purpose since the bryers and thornes of iniquity are to be found growing in the land of Gods people the hearts and lives of Gods saints Excellently to this purpose saith Lâ—â— who is found so voyd of fault that there is not in his life what justice may blame and mercy perdon it is the position of Solomon in his prayer upon his supposition If they sin against thee for there is no man that sinneth not and the assertion of St. Iames including himself in the number who yet was called Iames the just In many things we offend all yea our blessed Savâ—our prescribeth it as part of a forme of prayer for his own disciples Forgive us our trespasses and as St. Cyprian well noteth to check any high conceits of our sanctity he mindeth us of our dayly sins for which we have need dayly to ask pardon Indeed as St. Gregory aptly we must know there are some faults not to be avoyded by the most righteous persons such are those delicta quotidianae incursionis as Tertullian calls them sins of quotidian incursion to which all men are subject yea in respect of these it is St. Ambrose his complaint unus quisque nostrum per singulas horas quà m multa delin◠〈◊〉 in how many things doe every one of us offend every hour no wonder if St. Cyprian assert opus est nobis quotidiana sanctificatione We have need of renewed sanctification that as we sin dayly so we may be dayly purged by repentance nay that the wise man makes the challenge who can say I have made my heart clean I am pure from my sin We can neither ascribe what purity we have to our selves nor yet attribute perfection to our purity To illustrate this more distinctly consider 1. Even the externall conversation of the best men is not exactly pure The life of a Christian is as it were a book his birth the Title page his Baptisme the Epistle Dedicatory his years the leavs and his actions the lines in those leaves and there are some lines in the leaves of the fairest life which by reason of their errata are legenda cum venia to be looked upon with a favorable eye since if God should examine our acts with a severe eye woe would be to the most commendable life as St. Augustine excellently 2. Put the case that a man were free in respect of his externall actions yet who is free from internall motions though thy hands were perfectly cleane yet thy heart is not To be free from all titillations and motions is not for this life which is a continued temptation that expression of our Saviour He that is washed need not save to wash his feet is fitly alluded to by St. Bernard for our present purpose He is washed whose head that is his intentions and hands that is his operations are cleane But our feet which are lusts and affections whilest we walke upon the dust of this world continually need washing 3. And yet further though one might arrive at such a perfection as to say with St. Paul I know nothing by my selfe yet as he saith of himselfe he could not thereby be justifyed Indeed it is most probable that the Apostle there speaketh onely in respect of the discharge of his calling concerning which he knew nothing by himselfe for which he was blame worthy but take it in the largest extent that he knew nothing by himselfe in the present bent of his heart and course of his life yet he as well as David and so every Saint hath reason to pray Cleanse me from secret sins many things being sins which yet we know not to be so and there being much filth and uncleannesse in our hearts which by reason of their deceitfullnesse we are not able to discover and finde out 4. Finally Our holiest services are full of infirmities so that if we say we have not sinned in the best duty that ever we performed we deceive our selves This was visibly represented where Aaron the high priest a tipe of Christ was to beare the iniquity of their holy things and it is not improbably conceived as the assertion of Solomon when he saith There is not a just man on earth that doth good and sinneth not that is who sinneth not in the good he doth yea it is the confession of the Church All our righteousnesses are as filthy rags upon which St. Bernâ—rd Our righteousnesse though upright is not pure unlesse we think our selves better then those who uttered those words and Gerson upon the same Scripture infers Who dare then boast of his righteousnesse before God No brethren there is a worme in our best fruits drosse in our purest gold smoak in our brightest fire spots in our most beautiful splendid performances our graces are not without their defects our duties not without their defaults who finds not his knowledge dâ—mme his faith weake his love cold his zeale remisse Who may not complain of dulness deadness wandringnes in his devotion Who ever could say he loved