errores That in one artikle of the communion of the one kynd or vnder both he is conuinced of 36. filthy errors as Cochlaeus Reherseth at length In this giddinesse laboures Caluin whill in his booke adu gentil in diuerse his epistles to the Polonians affirmes some tyme Christ the Sone of God to be equal to his father furth with in his 2. of instit cap. 14. § 3. the same aequalitie he retractes Caluin is also variable in his opinion concerning the equalitie of Christ with his father and subiectes it to the Father alswell the diuine nature as the humane for treating how Christ in the day of judgment is to delyuer vp the kingdome to God his father than sayes he the name it self and the croun of glory and what soeuer he receaued of his father he shall again subiect to the father that God may be all in all In conclusion of this their reformed faith is not vndouted nether which they propound to be beleued is of the giddinesse of Heretikes whose variablenes and inconstancy is lyke to the windes of the heauen and therefor no faith nether religion is the profession of the reformed The last reasone is trew faith doth declare and shew the trew God trew saluation Trew faith shewes the trew God saluation and a good life The Protestāts faith is cleane contrary the trew way to liue well as also to escheu all kynd of filthynes and vncleannesse and such is the Catholik Roman faith and not Luthers or Caluins which conteine many things contrary to right reasone against diuine and humane lawes and naturall good maneres As first that infantes belieue in Baptisme Luth Luther sayes that infantes belieue in Baptisme Caluin that yt was decreed of God the sinne of Adam Caluiu sayes that God hath ordened some to life some to death and this is called his predestination Caluin makes God author of sinne contr Cochl Anno 23. Secondly that it was decreted of God that Adam should sinne Calu. lib. instit 3. c. 23. § 7. Thirdly that God hath decreed some to eternal life and other some to eternall condemnation and this is his preordination for all is not created to a lyke condition therefor as each one is made to his own proper end wither to life or to death we say that he is predestinat of God Caluin lib. 3. institut cap. 21. § 5. Morouer he makes God the author of sinne and to work iniquitie For sayes he he moueed Absalon to commit incest in that sayes he that Absalon with an incestuous commixtion defiled his fathers bed and did commit a detestable crime not with standing God pronuncis this work to be his dede and not Absalones Calu. lib. 1. inst cap. 18. § 1. ibid. c. 17 § 8. Morouer in the same book and chapter he sayes that God not only vsed the workes of the wicked but also gouerned their counsell and effects and to be author of all their scelerous deedes Againe he goeth about to glosse and defende the maiestie of God from sinne and accusation whill in the same booke both he purgeth God and makes him author of sinne and now sayes he from whence are the euills of Iob and the disobedience of Helies children which immediatly befor he hath alledged and proued to be of God and in the end plainly declaires and affirmes God to be the author of sinne how soeuer these Censorists-Papists wold of lykelyhood haue these to happen by his ydle permission Calu. lib. 1. cap. 14. § 16 cap. 18. § 4. Caluin sayes man hath no freewill but doth of necessitie A man is justified by only faith and all good workes are sinne Likewise hath he not extinguished and robbed man of freewill but to be ruled by necessitie Calu. lib. 1. cap. 15. § 1. Morouer Caluin teaches a man to be justified by only faith and good workes not only to be vnprofitable but to be abominable and how soeuer they be done of the righteous man they are euer sinne and abominable in the sight of God Calu. lib. 3. instit cap. 11. § 19. in this maner and paradoxes playeth the reformed applying against the law of right reasone and all good manners The end that heresies intendes and for the teaching of the trew faith vnto the knowledge of God and saluation and to liue Godly and well but their new no faith and hereticall reformation makes an open way to all kynd of wickednesse and to damnatiō and by this way the reformed blindes and obscures the knowledge of God which is made known by trew faith in teaching strange doctrin not to saluation but to condemnation and auouching such damnable paradoxes and opinions to the libertie of the fleshe to the following of all sensualite and wikednes and for conclusion this is the prophane bragg of the protestantes to call them selfs which they ar not no more then an ape is a man so no more ar the reformed catholikes albeit they desyre to be so called Whose reformation is inuented by the priuate inuention of particular men Heresie is by tolleration of som particular man now allowed now disproued and manteined by priuat affection of som priuat prince som tymes for fourtie yeares or fyftie as new faithes ar accustomed to be receaued now allowed now disprowed now imbraced now disliked so that this priuat faith is farr from the catholik faith which from the begining hath ben receaued and without interruption hath continued this faith may no wayes be devysed of man or inuented by man or vpon affection allowed and approwed but it must be learned of the church for faith is by hearing Bot treue faith is by hearing of the church and not be reading or reuelation as we see in the vocation of S. Paul to be a chosen vessell of God he was sent to Ananias in Damascus to learne of him what he should do also Cornelius a godlie mā and fearing god although he might haue ben taught of the angell that appeared to him yet was he not but by that same angell was commanded to send to Ioppa for Simon Peter to com to him and he shall shew thee Sayes he what thow ougthest to do So that this treu Catholik faith which the Roman church holdes is of Gods ordinance and learned of our predecessors and not as the reformed fatth is It is ane euil thing not to beleue the church deuysed and fained of new inuentions for as S. Leo sayes to Eutichian What is more wicked than to haue vngodly opinions and no◠to beleue the church and the holy fathers of the church whose wisdome and learning is in admiration to the world and therfore in the fight of all the world the reformed is condemned in vsurping their faith and name for Catholick whose entries and progress is nether of God nor for God nor sauor no point of the catholick faith nether of the catholick name for they ar allienat from this church and
contrary is with the Protestants no constancy no stability in their doctrin as witnes Zuingl Tom. 2. comm de vera falsa relig cap. de euch fol. 202. We recant here what we sayd there with this condition that that which we delyuer the 42 yeare of our age take place of what was taught in the 40. yeare In this same mynd is Beza in colloq mompel pag. 1â—0 268 388 I confesse me to haue written many things which I wish had not been written I would to God the memory of them all were abolished Moreouer they impugne this article and fall in misbeliefe who appeall to an inuisible Church remoued from all senses lyk a Platonicall Idea separated from all knowledge neyther extant in any country neyther read of in any history in which there is no Euangelicall Annunciation no Sacraments minystred no persones knowne and this is done because their conscience informed them that the true visible auncient and vniuersall Church in which Christs name Scriptures and Sacraments were preserued stood with vs agaynst them in auouching the same It is a desperat opinion proceeding from profound infidelitie As concerning that article The communion of Saints the forgiuenes of sinnes Against the 10 Article By this article it is euident that there should be a communion betwixt the liuing and the dead who liue and die in one faith hope and charity But this article is misbelâ—eued of the Protestants who deny all corespondence betwixt the Saincts in Heauen and men in earth As also they misblieue impugne Scriptures which iustify this controuersie of the inuocation of Saincts conformable to this article Moreouer this article disalloweth the discordes amongst the Protestants themselues For Sturn di ratiâ— contradict ineundae pag. 24. sayes that the Lutherans in their published bookes do condemne the Churches of England Fraunce Flanders Scotland c. And call their martyres Martyres of the Diuel And Iester Zuingl Caluinist lib. de diuturm belli eucha pag. 25.80 There is no end of chiding wryting accusing disputing condemning excoÌ„municating betwixt the Lutherans and the Caluinistes and this is the communion of the Saincts in the reformed Church Morouer they fall in misbeliefe and impugne this Article who affirme it blasphemie to giue tytles to Saincts in Heauen which they themselues vsurpe and giue to sinners on earth in this madde humor is Caluin who not induring any honour towards Saincts or images yet could permit his owne picture to be borne about the necks of them in Geneua and when some thought it insolent arrogancy and reprehensible admonished that the people might sinne thereby because they esteemed it as a remedy against mischances answered them grieue at it till yow burst and after hange your selues Bols in vita Calu. cap. 12. Morouer as concerning the forgiuenes of synnes all protestants remayne in this misbeliefe and are repugnant to this article partly affirming only fayth to iustifye and consequently being once in this Protestants fayth which once had can neuer be lost they can neuer after synne what should they belieue which they already haue as we haue declared in the second question at length Partly by making God the author of euil and themselues but bare instruments and consequently not themselues but that God hath need of the remission of sinnes Partly in saying a man hath no frewill and consequently cannot synne Partly by saying that synnes caÌ„not be forgiueÌ„ in the Church contrary to Christs doctrin Iob 20 For if the Protestant will not deny but there is remission of sinnes in baptisme whey not in pennance to the remission of sinnes for if the one be a washing of the spotted the other is also a lowsing of the bound and the one as necessary as the other Against the 2â— article Moreouer as concerning the resurrection of the dead this article is misbelieued and impugned amongst themselues For Luther sayth of the Caluinists that they intend to a manifest Apostasie coÌ„cerning this article Tom. 7. VVitt. defend Verb. Caen. fol. 390. The same Villagaignon epist ad Geneu in praef lib. 1 de euch affirmes that with his eares he hard it preached of the Caluinistes that the hope of lyf did not beloÌ„g to the bodyes but to the soules Lykwyse Almaricus on of Foxes Martyres as Caesar lib dial dial 5 affirmes sayd that there was no resurrection of the bodyes Caluin is of this same opinion in his epist ad Farell fol. 194. saying In that the resurrection of the flesh seemeth incredible to thee it is no thing admirable Moreouer they misbelieue this Article who deny mens soules to be immortall vnto which opinion Luther is inclyned Tom. 4 in Eccles cap. 9â— 5 10. It appears sayth he out of this place that the dead feel nothing Lykewyse Calu in praef Psiâ—hrinachiae in praef Gallasij sayes that he knew certayne good men to whome this opinion of the souls sleeping seemed sound It followes that he himself is one of these good meÌ„ who in the ps 130. sayes that the soules of the wicked are anihillated and not in hell lib. 3. iust cap. 25. § 12. and the residue to be but shadowes imaginations fantasies idoles dead And consequently no immortality Whereupon it was concluded in a solemne disputation at Geneua when they had long consulted how to auoyd purgatory to say Let vs affirme the soule to be extinguished togeather with the body Purgatorie is abolished by denying the article of the â—â—eed and so purgatory wil be spedely abolished For this doctrine is so vrgent that they are persuaded that it cannot well be denyed vntill the resurrection of the dead and the immortality of the soule also be denyed But why is purgatorie so annexed to this article that the Protestants are driuen to his extremity because they obserued that God oft forgiueth the offenses and yet reserueth a chastisment for satisfaction as in Adam in Moyses in Dauid whose offenses being forgiuen yet Adam remayned subiect to death This place serueth for the proofe of Purgatory and indured all other myseries Moyses neuer entred into the land of promise Dauids ch ld begotten in sinne dyed So lykewyse because God is euer one and lyk himself such as repent late or slakly might be forgiuen at their death and yet for satisfaction remayne in purgatory therefore it is the rediest way to deny purgatory by the denyall of the resurrection of the dead and mortality of the soule Against the 12 article And as for that Article the lyfe euerlasting So many are in misbeliefe and impugne this as deny God Heauen the resurrection of the dead the immortality of the soule and our redemption by Christ c. And this is the great aboundaÌ„t light of truth that hath sprung with the reformed who in the blindnes and night of darkenes wherein they are wrapped do vant and glorifie as in the clearnes of the light Greg. lib. 1. Mor cap. 26. who wil be more curious to know how
36. Not withstanding not so Only faith neuer patronizeth defendes internall iustification for the only faith of the father the health of the doughter is giuen although Christ stirred vp the father to belieue yet this fact doth not patronize nor defendes not the building of only faith to internall iustification but Christ speakes to him as a Phisitian vseth to speak to the patient saying only be of good courage and thow shall be wholl whill neuer theles he prescribes him to obserue a dyet and other wholsome medicines euen so is the health of the soule ascrybed to faith by the rest of other vertues because right faith is the fundament and roote of all other vertues neither is any work done absolutlie without faith acceptable to God OBIECTION I. WE know that we ar translated from death to lyf becaus we loue the bretheren 1. Iohan. cap. 3. v. 14. Therefor by speciall faith we ar certaine of ryghteousnes and forgiuenes of synnes for this is the translation from the death of synne to the lyf of grace c. ANSVVER THow art deceaued for lyf is not here supposed for iustification but for lyfe eternall as though he said We know vs to be instituted heires of eternall lyf and of that caelestiall kingdome if we loue the bretheren for this word because is taking for if conditionally OBIECTION II. THe incertitude of remission of synnes and of the present righteousnes doth torment and tortor the consciences of the faithfull takes away quyetnes and induceth diuerse anxieties add doubtes so that our archrabbie Luther in the 4. chapt of Gen. sayes the Papistes now Laitlie haue vsed to teach that we ought to wauer and doubt of the remission of synnes grace and saluation For this cause our confederat frind Chemnitius in his treatise of the certitude of iustifying faith calleth the papist Church a Shoppe of doubtes therefor this speciall faith is to be retained of the reformed Church with the certitude of actuall rychteousnes and by consequence of the remission of our synnes which makes our conscience free of a thowsand launcinge and pearcing scruples of the Papistes ANSVVER GOd forbid that we should wrappe snares of desperation or eyther butcher tortour the consciences of the faithfull for that we cōsent not to your only faith for neither the onely heauenly faith takes away all tortour of conscience neither doth it free men of these scruples neuertheles some morall certitude is gotten by faith or by diuers signes of the state of iustifying grace and of the remission of synnes for iust men may aspyre and rise to this certitude that ofte they fear not howbeit they might fear if they consider and looke to their own infirmitie First in the confiding and trusting them to be in grace so that in them selues be founde no contrary opposition and yet they may doubt and fear least perchance they be deceaued which way of iudginge of their owne richteousnes should be comō to all righteous men The second is muche more perfecter neither comone to all but to these only who are treuly turned to God with great zealle and feruour or haue long serued him with greate deuotion who may reache and attaine to that perfection that morally they ar certaine in some manner that they are in grace so that neither are they anxious ar moued with any doubt neither do they feare as morally a mā is certaine to be a Christian and to be verely baptized howbeit some maner of way he may doubte if he consider his owne fragilitie which is prone to doubt but dothe aspyre to the seconde perfection to wit that after long contrition and doing of pennance is absolued and lykwise is baptized in the intention of the church and liues a holy lyfe and by dayly examining findes nothing in him self guiltie of synne as also in contemning the world and studyinge to please god doth finde this certainety in them selues with these morall signes before iustifying faith to delight them selues in the exercises of vertue and to be penitent for their synnes committed to absteine from synne and to ouercome the perturbations of the mynd as wrath lust vaine-gloire passiones to Loth dispyse the world and to feele an internal motion to good things tranquillitie in mynd and peace in conscience a feruour to loue God and an affection to loue of the neygetbour to remitte trespasse and iniurie which how much the more they aboūde in man he is the perfecter and is more certaine and feare is lesse and confidence doth growe and increase the more in so farr that S. Basil in Reg. Breuior sayes VVhosoeuer takes heede and considers his owne fragilitie and pityeth other menns and is wholly affected towardes God let him belieue him to haue forginenes of synnes and to be in a goode confidence yit not withstanding with feare for Salom. Prouerbior 28. v. 14. tearmes the man blessed who is euer fearfull for securitie is the mother of negligence as writes S. Gregorius libro 6. epist. 286. Therefor God would not that our hope should only leane and depende on the promisses of God but to be strengthned and fortifyed with the merites of good workes as of contrition for our synnes and amendment of lyfe by the which the certitude of morall righteousnes sufficiētly aboundes and expelles the scruples of all anxietie and care and geaues to the iustman clearnesse of conscience and peace of mynde So that the reformed church in which this onely faith is forged and maintained is a merchant shoppe of temeritie presumption and perdition OBIECTION OVr Sauiour sayes to the sick of the palsie Matth. 9. v. 2. Sonne belieue they synnes ar forgiuen thee therefore God to the remission of synnes requires only faith and the euangelicall confidence and no other thing of vs therefor only faith is sufficient and is commended of Christ. ANSVVER I Deny thy absurde sequelle by the obteineinge of remissiō of synnes he is cōmanded of Christ to stirre vp confidence in him self and because of the precedent remission by saith the paralyt here in this place is commanded to belieue and to conceaue confidence of his future health for it is not said to him thy synne shal be remitted to thee as to come in the future where vpon they might build their only faith but Christ saith to him his synnes are forgiuene already and therefor here he exhortes him to tak confidence of his future health for thy synnes which was the cause of thy infirmitie now already are forgiuen remitted So that this only faith is neither sufficient neither is commended of Christ for iustifying faith but rather accursed and reiected as inuented of man QVAESTIO III. Of the article of the Creede I belieue the remission of synnes HOw belieue the Roman Papists the article of the Creed I belieue the remission of synnes if we accept not of only faith Caluin lib. 3. inst cap. 13. Brent in prolog cont a Soto ANSVVER ANd I pray thee good reader obserue
how the reformed belieue this article of the creed to wit the remission of synnes Cal. doctrine can not agree accord with this article Good workes are synne seing that they say that all our workes ar mixed and defyled with synne and what soeuer good workes shal be done of the most holyest man by the vncleannes and the impuritie of the fleshe are polluted corrupt and putrifyed Man is not fre neither of originall nor actuall synne by any Sacrament Only faith by imputatiue iustice maketh man fre Lyckwise he teaches that we are not free of originall synne neither are we absolued or remitted from any other synnes howsoeuer confessed and satisfyed but only couered by the imputatiue righteousnes of Christ neither are these synnes imputed to the fault nor to the punishment as Rabbi-Caluin teaches lib. 3 inst cap. 14. § 9.10 11. lib. 4. inst cap. 15. § the which doctrine doth subuert and ouerthrow the very article of our creede to wit the remission of synnes Cal. reiectes the iudgment of S. Aug concerning synne in the regenerat He teaches that in the sainctes synne reignes All the regenerat ar in aid cleaue by imputatiue iustice which stoutlie he defendes by reiecting and casting of the opinion and iudgment of S. Austen de concupiscentia in renatis We teach sayes he in the holy Sainctes euer to be synne vntill they be freed and vnclothed of this mortall body lib. 3. inst cap. 3. § 10. and proceeding more deeplie to iustify his doctrine of only faith moues this doubte and solues it him self But how is it sayes he that God doth purge his Church of all synne and that he promiseth to hir the graces of fredome and puritie by baptisme and doth fulfill it in his elect It is referred and fulfilled in communicating his imputauiue iustice and this God performes and exhibites in regenerating his own that in them the kingdome of synne may be distroyed abolished by subministratinge to them vertue of the holy Spirit by which they are superior and victors in the fight lib. 3. instit cap. 3. § 11. Synne to reigne and not imputed for a faust is false doctrin And a litle after those reliques of synne which be in his sainctes we cōfesse them not to be imputed as if they were not of the which doctrine it followes synne absolutlie not to be remitted for it implicates a contradiction synne to reigne and not to be imputed for a fault for Caluin affirmes Cal. sayes synne reignes not but dwelles Synne failes to reigne in the sainctes but not to dwell as an other contradiction Contrariwise catholikes exhort all men firmely to belieue assured lie confide that there is remission of synnes in the holy Church and this remission is to vs and to yow and to Iudas the triator and to euery mortall synner and to those that now are and to those that shal be hereafter and to those that are in purgatorie for Christ hath promerited to all abundantlie who hanging in the crosse is made a propitiation for our synnes and not for ours only The Catholikes firmly belieue remissiō of synnes but for the synnes of the whole world But that we Catholikes belieue all men to haue receaued and obteined remission of their synnes de facto sola fide credendo not onely we Catholikes deny and gainstand but also the Scriptur for treuly Christ hath tasted the death for all But that all men haue remission of synnes de sacto is against the Scriptur and Christs death We belieue the remission of synnes by the power of the Church but all do not apply to them the fruite of his most pretious death for in deed he is made the cause of saluation to all but yet the Scriptur sayes Heb. 5. v. 9. He was made the author of eternall saluation vnto all them that obey him Therefore wee belieue most firmly the remission of synnes but not to be remitted in particular by onely faith but that power is giuen to the Church to remitt synne and to reteine synne Howbeit we admitt the heauenly promisses of the remission of synnes iustification and eternall lyfe Remission of synnes is not made to any in particulat The promises of God are to all a lyke are made with condition and such lyke which generally is denounced to perpeteyne to euery man to wit so farr as lyeth in God who without acception of persones promisseth and giueth to all men abundantly but with that condition that he do worthy pennance for his synnes and to keepe the commandementes of God as Ezech. cap. 18. v. 21. If the vngodly man shall do pennance for his synnes which he hath wrought and shall keep my preceptes and do iudgment and righteousnes he shall liue the lyfe and shall not die and lykwise Matth. cap. 10. v. 22. Yow shal be hated of all men for my name saks but who shall perseuer vnto the end shal be saued No mā is certaine of perseuerance in vertue But because a man is vncertaine of his owne righteousnes and perseuerance in virtue and lykwise vncertaine of his saluation therefore it is said in the holy Scripture Apocalyps 3. v. 11. Hold fast what thow hast that no man tak thy crown for there hath falne Saul Salomon Iscariotes Many haue falne those they stoode as of the Caluin som are made Turkes Paulus Alciatus Sartor Blandrata Socimus Lysmannus Luther Calu. and many more of the protestantes companious abiuringe their faith are falne to Turcisme Mahematisme and Atheisme as witnesseth Beza in the history of Valentine Gentill and Caluino-Turcismus lib 1. cap. 2. Wherevpon we may gather that the great maxime of the Caluinistes Theologie is falne and is conuniced of falsehood affirming that only faith once gotten neuer doth faile or decayes as stoutly Cudsemius in his Hyperaspisce declares but when we see their owne turned from their owne faith to infidelitie what iudgment is against them and what condemnation fall they into no lesse treuly than in the same iudgment and damnation of the heresiarches who by the doctrin of this only faith minister subiectes to Paganisme and Atheisme OBIECTION I. THerefor what Dost thow commande and bids vs dispaire ANSVVER GOd forbid for as we deny that any can firmly belieue certainlye persuade him self of the remission of his synnes euen so no lese we affirme cōstantlie that euery Christian man is bound to belieue and with faith to do what is in him to expect the effect of faith What Christiās ar bound to hope with firme and sure hope in this lyf of true remission of synnes by the Sacrament of baptisme and pennance and in the world to come to eternall lyf which hope except we haue it firme and constant in vaine we ar called Christians OBIECTION II. THow speakes a paradox and a contrary thing for firmly to belieue and assuredly to persuade thow denyes and yet thow commaundes and biddes euery one to be
nothing they were of no force but only the death of Christ redeemes promerits for vs and that his preaching is lesse a vaylable then other mens who by preaching do cancell the multitude of sinnes Lykewyse his fasting and prayers werelesse worth then the Niniuites who thereby eschewed the wrath of God likewyse lesse worth theÌ„ Moyses who purchased to the Israelits gods fauour more ouer his voluÌ„tary pouerty his innocent lyfe his circumcision his workes of mercy are of noe value and benefit Wheras in any other all and euery one of these had been a sufficient pryce for Heauen which caÌ„not be denyed to be of infinit pryce in Christ and consequently of sufficiencie all and euery one of them to redeeme a thowsand worlds vnlesse Christ be denyed to be of infinit dignity Wherfore all divynes belieue that Christs death was a demonstration of excesse of loue because he so loued his that of the end and consummation of all loue he left them aboundant proofes and that his merites were sufficient to redeeme a thowsand worldes if Christ would haue ben coÌ„tented with that which was sufficient omitting what was aboundant D. Thom. 3. part de Christs mers is 1.2 quaest 114. rota Wherupon it followeth that neyther his death was sufficient satisfaction of sinne and consequently neyther Christs lyfe nor death are allowed to be meritorious and sufficient to redeeme vs. Morouer a great absurditie followeth because they euacuate Christs death who make Christ vnuoluntary to haue suffered for vs for as euery sinn is voluntary so is euery merit But Calu. in cap. 26. Mat. v. 39 sayes that he refused to discharge the office of a mediator reputed Christ at the tyme of his passion to haue had no sufficiencie aboue other men and that in his prayer did not appeare a temperate moderation et Caluin lib 2. inst cap. 13. § 10 11.12 sayth that he was tormeÌ„ted with doutfulnes of his conscience and that he was astonished with the horror of Gods malediction and tormented with the fear of the bottoÌ„les pit of horrible destruction and he burst out into a voice crye of desperation and being ouerwhelmed in desperatioÌ„ he ceased to pray long to God Which doctrine also coÌ„firmeth Beza in cap. 27. Matth. Marlor in Psal 22. Morouer they euacuate the passion of Christ who affirme him to haue been our deliuerer only and not our redeemer Heâ—lius apud Cleâ—itium in Victoria part 2. And lykewyse also they who reiect the name of merit and with Caluin affirme lib. 2. inst c. 17. § 1 If any would sayth he oppose Christ to the iudgement of God there would no place remayne to any merit because there is not in man that dignity to deserue any thing of God And so for conclusion of Caluins assertion the merit of Christs death is naught Christ is only affirmed to be but man not God For in expresse tearmes all Hereticks saye Christs blood Death and passioÌ„ to haue nothing auayled to the redeÌ„ption of mankynd and that Christ with all his workes deserued not heauen or at the least to say that his death and passion are profitable only for the predestinat and that no other haue any benefit thereby Calu. cont Heshus pag. 39. Beza in colloq Mompel 1. pag. 522. Bucc sup Ioh. pag. 34. Musc in loc Theol. fol. 363.367 Zanch. in miscellam pag. 3. 200. 206. Aret. apud Schlus lib. 1. art 6.25.26 lib. 2. fol. 42. Theol. Calu. Wherby it followeth that Christ is not redeemer of all or mediator for all offences and offenders neyther intending their saluation Against the 6. Article How the protestants deny Christ to haue descended into Hell Moreouer as concerning that Article He descended into Hell the third day he rose againe froÌ„ the dead It is mightely impugned of the Protestantes for Carlil in his book that Christ descended into Hell sayes it is a pernicious Heresie to say that Christ descended into Hell and Beza in Apol. 2. ad Zantes pag. 385. These wordes sayes he entred into the creed by inaduertisement Or otherwayes by glossing these wordes that his descending was only the suffering of the panges of death on the crosse wher not only his humanity but also his diuinity indured paynes yea and death Luth. conc pag. 276. sayes that he would not acknowledge Christ to be his Sauiour if only his humanity had suffered Yea Caluin backes Luther in Cataeches cap. de fide This is Christ descention to hell that he suffered that death which God in his angre inflicteth on the wicked And againe lib. 2. inst cap. 16. § 10 cap. 26.27 Matth. That he suffered all the paynes in his soule which by God in reuendgmeÌ„t are exacted of the damned thus he In which doctrine is contayned besyde the death of Christs body the death of his soule Calu. blasphemies against the holy Ghost and of his diuinity that after he had endured such deaths to haue suffered all punishments of the damned Morouer they impugne this article by making his descentioÌ„ nothing els Christ descention to Hel how it is vnderstood of the Hereticks but Christs buriall in the sepulchre as Zuing Oecol Buc. Calu. inst Trem Marel Beza doe affirme And because the common name for Hell in Hebrue doth signifie somtyme a graue or ditch And yetnotwithstanding Caluin confesseth that the sayd name more vsually properly doth signifie Hell the place and state of the damned also many of the ProtestaÌ„t professors oppose Beza shewing by manifold passages of Scripture that the Hebrue word Scheol the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in Latin Infernus doe signifie an Infernall proper place of the damned And yet neuerthelesse some are not ashamed to deny Christs descention to heel thereby to maintayn their former blasphemies They intend to deny limbo and purgatory by denying Christs desceÌ„tion of his suffering the paynes of the damned on the Crosse and to euacuate the delyuerance of the Fathers out of the Limbo and purgatorie And therfore to remoue these blockes out of way Beza in cap. 2. Act. He traÌ„slates by his owne confession and contrary to the opinion of his fellow compagnions contrary to the Greeke Latin interpretors and Fathers Wherupon D. Humfrey lib. 2. derat interpret pag 219 220. saies that the forsayd Hebru word should not be traÌ„slated graue but hell if the authority of the holy Ghost be obserued For this hath been Bezas inteÌ„tion to traÌ„slate graue for hell and Christ soule for body to deny hell Hell is taken metaphorically of the Protestantes and all infernall torments and that mention is made of hell metaphorically Albeit forgetting himself proueth by Scripture and Fathers the coÌ„trary saying in cap. 16. Luc. That Christ descended into the earth into the receptacle of those who were there long retained Moreouer Bullinger in 1. Pet. cap. 4. impugnes this article that Christ descended no otherwayes into hell then as he dayly
I haue loued Iacob and haue hated Esau in which the Apostle concludes that Iacob is not for his forseen workes beloued of God with the loue of predestination euen so neyther Esau for his forseen sinnes to be had in hatred and reprobation of God and therefore the one is loued and the other is hated for the only ostentation of his mercy and iustice without respect of their merites and demerites ANSVVER BY Iacob Esau are vnderstood two people to wit the Idumeans and Israelites and therfore by the name of Iacob he declares the Synagogue with her head and by the name of Esaw the people descended of Esaw with their head it followeth that this loue towards Iacob was in the good will of God to giue to the Synagogue those preuiledges by helpe of which many was saued and predestinate And the hatred of God in this place towards Esaw and his posterity is nought els then lesse loue whom God would not preuent with such singular preuiledges but permitted them with their head to fall in sinne and to be obdurate in sinne and therefore this word hatred is taken for the lesse loue as is frequent in Scripture Luc. 14. v. 26. If any man come to me and hate not his Father c. So that Iacob was elected to a farre more helpe of grace and greater preuiledges then Esau for of Iacob and his posterity Christ was borne and not of Esau also Iacob receaued a temporall inheritance in a figure of an eternall inheritance and benediction and Esau only left to common helpes of grace hereupon Iacob is beloued because of the singulare graces giuen to him which was denyed to Esau seing the election to be inequall because of the will of the caller and not the merites of the one or demerites of the other it is sayd I haue loued Iacob and hated Esau and to giue a token of his loue he sayes that the elder shall serue the younger which according to the letter we read in no Scripture that Esau euer serued Iacob neyther doth he absolutly speake in this place of predestination and reprobation yet notwithstanding so he speakes of those grounds in which proper reason teaches in what consistes election and reprobation OBIECTION IT is sayd by the Apostle ibid. v. 15. I will haue mercy on whom I will haue mercy and I will show mercy on whom I will show mercy Therefore it is not the Willer nor the Runer but of God that showeth mercy c. Therefore as mercy is of God euen so is reprobation in the will of God vnto the ostentation of his iustice ANSVVER THe Sequell is false for neyther to haue mercy is to predestinate or not to haue mercy is to reprobate but to haue mercy is to conferre and giue meanes by which men is delyuered and made fre from the miseryes which sinne induceth with it and this mercy is in the will of God which he giueth to one and not to another neyther can any complayn because God giues sufficient grace to all men if that man cooperate therewith In the same manner is vnderstood the discourse of the potter and the clay as concerning precious and contemptible vesselle for so the Apostle argues if it please the Potter to make a vessell to honour and in another to dishonour which in the coniecture of man is a great worke may not it please God to do that which is lesse For if an Potter of an Clay may make two vessels after his will to honour or ignominy may not God make of two sinners who is basser then clay through their owne fault two vessels eyther to honor or ignominy after the multitudes of his mercy or the equity of his iustice in giuing to the one conuenient help and grace by which God foreseeth him to be mollifyed by pennance and to be formed a vessell to honour by good workes And vnto the other he giues meanes sufficient albeit not in such aboundance or powerfull yet sufficient to saue their soules if they work sufficiently with these meanes But when these meanes are not followed and applyed which are sufficient that it is sayd that God leaues him in his owne will this way he is sayd to be indured and hardned of God But wheras the Apostle sayes what if God would to shew his wrath and to make his power known this sense is more difficile for he speaketh not simpliciter as delightfull in the punishement of man but for the reason of iustice and to make his power knowne who longe hath sustayned with patience the vessels of vrath that is to say expecting their pennance and ready to help thē with his graces who withstanding him haue obdured themselues that he may show the riches of his glory in the vessels of mercy and so by a consecutiue reasō in shewing the power of his wrath on the one in the righteousnes of his iustice is the ministring of mercy to the other to come to glory What herein can any man complaine seing he hath sufficient helpe of God if he will worke with that help No man can perish for it is Gods will that all men should be saued and none should perish 1. Tim. 1. who delytes not in the death of a sinner Ezech. 18. Where it is to be noted the saying of the Apostle and the end why the reprobat are permitted to sinne the suffering of them was not only that God should show his wrath in them and vindicatiue iustice but also that he might show the riches of his glory in the vesseles of mercy for the death of Christ should not haue been neyther the death of his martyres if God had not permitted sinnes c. OBIECTION SAinct Paul seemeth to speake of predestination so that there is no cause in vs of rebrobation because all is referred to the only good pleasure of God For which cause the Apostle cryeth out O the deaphes of the riches of the wisdome and of the knowledge of God how incomprehensible are his iudgements his wayes vnsearchable Thus he ANSVVER THe Apostle exclames not admiring the secret causes of predestination and reprobation but the immense wisdome of God his counsell and dispensation of his grace and fayth Who hath permitted both the Gentils and the Iewes to fall in infidelity that he may haue mercy on both as at length in this place is discussed but as touching the wordes of the Apostle saying when the children as yet were not borne nor had done good oreuill By which example it is euident that neyther nations nor particular persones be elected eternally or called tēporally or preferred to Gods fauour by their merits because when God made these two persones he loued Iacob and refused Esaw respecting them both euill and the one as guilty as the other for originall sinne which was alyke in them both And therefore iustly where he might haue reprobated both he saued of mercy one which one being as euill and as voyde of
v. 28. Where Christ asked of the two blind men saying belieue yee that I can doe this to yow In which wordes he demaundes the consent of their vnderstanding which assent or consent and S. Aug. lib. de praed Sanct. sayth he would haue them belieue vertue to be existant in the power of Christ by which he would haue them belieue there health and restauring of their sight not that foolish special iustifying fayth which you dreame of your own inuention Neyther this confent as S. Aug. sayth fuffices not to the conseruation of righteousnes neyther to saluation but besides these are requisit good workes and the obseruance of the Commandemēts of God Good workes is very requisit to fayth by which the iust man groweth in righteousnes and charity according to that saying of S. Iames cap. 2. v. 21. That Abraham our Father was iustifyed of workes that is to say by works he is made more righteous What els mean other places of Scripture in demāding good fruict and greater abondance of righteousnes aboue the Pharisaicall righteousnes to this effect the yongman asken what worke was to be done needfull for him to enter into the Kingdome of Heauē our Sauiour answeres not saying belieue and thou shal be iust as the Protestants presupposition is but he sayth to him If thow wilt enter into the lyfe kept the commandements Matth. 19. v. 17. which commandements was the Decalogue as Christ expones vnto him Workes are the fruict of faith To what end is this speciall fayth when the true fayth suffices not to doe absolutely right well but charity ioyned with fayth doth make men iust and the sonnes of God because the Apostle sayth 1. cor 13. v. 1. Without charity all to be insufficient to saluation what a man can doe so consequently fayth of it self suffices not without workes which proceed of charity Luther moekes good workes Therefore let Luther be ashamed in making this wicked skoffagainst good workes in his sermon saying I say to thee because the way is strait and narrow it behoweth thee to bethin small if thou wilt come be that way but it followeth who are charged with works as we see ye pilgrims of S. Iames to be loden with there clam-shelles can no way enter into Heauen To conclude the counsell of Luther is different frō the counsell of Christ who commendes the frutes of righteousnes proceeding from fayth and the other discomendes all good workes to establish his naked only fayth OBIECTION IVstification oft in the Scripture is attributed to only fayth as Luc. 7. v. 50. Thy fayth hath made the whole and lykewise Rome 5. v 50. VVe are iustifyed of faith Therefore in vaine are workes ANSVVER AS the Scripture hath attributed iustification to fayth euen so lykewyse to hope to feare to pennance and to Almesse As Rom. 8. v. 24. By hope we are saued and Tob. 4. v. 11. Almesse delyuere from sinne and death also Eccl. 1. v. 27. The feare of the Lord expelleth sinne ergo it followeth these to iustify as well as only fayth and if there be rightly vnderstood ioyned with fayth Workes ioyned with faith iustify a man make iustification for they are the fruicts of fayth and so it is not only fayth that maketh a man iust for that word is not found in the Scripture only but because faith is the foundament and root from whence other vertues groweth Therefore righteousnes and saluation is attributed to him although mention is not made so ample of the vertues as of the foundation for what pulchritude and beauty is in a tree all dependes of the roote euen so what vertue and righteousnes groweth with man all is commended to proceed of fayth as of the roote and foundation of others OBIECTION THe Scripture speaking of the Euangely and explicating what it is as it were by a Emthesis sayth the Euangely which is to say Gods word saueth vs as 1. cor 15. v 2. The Euangely sayth he by which yee are saued and lykewyse Iacob 1. v. 18. VVillingly hath he begotten vs by the word of verity Therefore by fayth and not by workes we are iustifyed and for this cause we Protestants giue our selues to preaching of the word to the reading of the Bybel that by the word of fayth we may be feede and saued ANSVVER MIserable Protestāts how art thou deceaued in hearing preachings and in profitable reading of the Byble when thou vnderstandes it not For if thou would vnderstand thy owne proposition thou shall well know that the word of God saueth not formally but by way of Gods proponed grace and our obedience and not be only fayth as S. Iames cap. 2. v. 24. sayth in expresse wordes See sayth he how a man is iustifyed of workes and not of fayth only OBIECTION BVt how sayth S. Paul Rom. 3. vers 20. Gall. 2. vers 16. That no man by the vvorkes of the Law can be iustifyed ANSVVER WEll agreeth S Paul and S. Iames by diuers reasons for S. Paul sayth that the workes of the Law without relation to Christ auailleth not to righteousnes which S. Paul so hyghly disputes and againe the workes of the Law with relation to Christ conioyned with faith to auaille much so that S. Iames and S. Paul denyeth not good works done by fayth but teaches expresly the vtility of them as Gal. 5. v. 6. saying in Christ Iesu neyther is circumcision any thing neyther the preputie◠but faith which by charity is wrought and seing it is euident that the requyres demaundes good works which commeth of faith and charity that only fayth may be secluded OBIECTION YF Abraham is iustifyed of workes he hath wherein to reioyce but not with God Rom. 4. v. 2. Therefore we cannot reioyce and boost of our workes ANSVVER I Say that neyther Abraham nor any other man could glory and reioyce of their workes in the mynde and sense of S. Paul that is to say in the merites of their workes done without fayth as the Iewes did reioyce of to wit of righteousnes done without grace by the knowledge of the Law which obseruation was very imperfect in them for that they keeped the Law but in a part to wit concerning certaine externall things OBIECTION CHrist hanging on the Crosse hath sayd it is finished Iohn 19. v. 20. Therefore there remaine no workes for all are done by Christ and no more is required no fasting pennance and satisfaction c. ANSVVER THe true sense of these wordes are that Christ hath finished the work of our redemption on the Crosse For if otherwyse the Protestant vnderstand this they ought not to baptyse nor be baptised frequent the Lords Supper Preach sing-psalmes pray nor fast c. OBIECTION ONly Fayth suffices as sayth Thomas de Aquino ergo ANSVVER SO it is in the mynd of the Doctor to the vnderstanding and conception of the mystery of the Eucharist and not to the conseruation of righteousnes and to the
properly of worth and right merite eternall lyfe without any preiudice of gods diuine Maiesty Which doctrine of fayth is valled with stroÌ„g reasons of holy Scriptures which no man will deny that is not preuented with a malicious mynd and carnall passion who hath the smalest taest in the diuine Scriptures shall easily defyne this argument so that Eccl 16 v. 15. sayth all mercy maketh a place to euery one according to the merite of his worke How euident is merite expressed to be a consequent of mercy what in this word is to be hated and abhorred of the Protestantes if they loue the Scripture for if they deteste the one they must detested the other and so the Scripture is as abominable to them as the word merite and goode workes are next to Ecclesiasticus S. Paul auouches the same saying Heb. 13. v. 16. doe good and to distribute forget not for with sacrifice God is promerited And lykewyse of these places in which it is sayd that God giueth to euery maÌ„ a rewarde wadges according to the measure condition and dignity of the worke which is nothing other then according to the good merite of the worke or the euill as it is sayd Psal 6. v. 13. That God giues to euery one according to his workes And lykewyse S. Matth. 16. v. 27. sayth That when the sonne of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his Angels then shall he giue to euery one according to his workes And lykewyse S. Paul 1. cor 3. v. 8. sayth That euery one shall receaue his proper wadges according to his labour What is else merit but wadges and a reward and a condigne recompensation of euery mans laboures workes But now if there be no mention of merit which word the Protestantes abhorreth how are wadges and rewards distributed and giuen and lykewyse punishements For doth not God punish man for euill according to the euill and remunerates man with eternall lyfe for good workes accordâ—ng as they are good workes and therefore seing euill workes of worth ex condigno merites this punishement which is eternall shall not good workes and welldoing merite eternall lyfe as a reward and a remuneration of good things for if we obserue peculiarly the name of wadges and rewarde alleadged of the Apostle it giueth vs to vnderstand that wadges hath no place but where is merite for they are correlatiues one with the other for there is due no wadges where there is no merite neyther followeth merite but where there is workes OBIECTION CAluin lib. 3. inst cap. 15. § 2. sayth that the Kingdome of God improperly is called wadges seing it is the inheritaÌ„ce of the children ergo ANSVVER VVHerefore is it rather improperly sayd waidges then inheritance seing the same be waidges and inheritance and the same with diuerse titles may be debt to vs as appeareth euidently in Christ to whome the accideÌ„tall glory of his body was true waidges as sayth the Apostle Phil. 2. v. 8.9 He hath humbled himself and is made obedient to the death euen to the death of the Crosse for which God hath exalted him and hath giuen him a name which is aboue all name c. For that he promerited the same through his humility and passion for if he had not promerited this accidentall glory to his body as waidges the Apostle had not sayd this word propter quod which waidges was also in heritance due to him by reason of his hypostaticall vnion euen so lyfe eternall is inheritance to the iust and innocent for somuch as they are adopted sonnes of God by habituall grace which only title is dewe to baptised infantes And lykewyse lyfe eternall is waidges to the children of adoption forsomuch as they merit it with good workes done in the state of Grace And therfore it is not called improperly waidges more then inheritance seing both the inheritance and waidge depende on the merite of good vvorkes OBIECTION THe Lutherans argue that lyfe eternall is called waidges not that it is giuen or due for good workes but because it is anexed to the promises of God and therefore it is due to vs by promise and not of no merite ANSVVER I Say a man instructed confirmed with habituall grace of God may exhibet and doe a work condigne and worthy of eternall lyfe because he is moued with the spirit of God whose supernaturall motion intendes to lyfe eternall and therefore for that cause these good workes are so high and excellent as is the selfe life eternall And therfore with diuyne promise ioyned lyfe eternall shal be debtfull to that worke and for that cause that vvork shall merite truely and properly lyfe eternall as a merite and so our merites draw their owne condition which are done and wrought by the grace of God OBIECTION THe Apostle sayth Rom. 6. v. 23. That the grace of God is lyfe eternall but that which is of grace is not debtfull to vs by way of wadges of righteousnes And for this cause it is sayd Psal 102 v. 4 That God hath crowned vs vvith mercy and compassion ergo of grace and not of vvorkes is lyfe eternall ANSVVER WHo is so ignoraÌ„t that knoweth not that lyfe eternall is called grace because the coÌ„dâ—gne merites of lyfe eternall are of the grace of God as sayth S. Aug. Epist 105. For if S. Paul calleth death the stipeÌ„d of sinne eueÌ„ so the stipeÌ„d of righteousnes may be called lyfe eternal or the stipend of death stipend of lyfe is merite demerit as correlatiues are for in this the Apostle hath changed a kynd of speach that he might exclud ambition and pryd out of the hart of man and especially such as would that lyfe eternall should be due and properly giuen for their owne righteousnes without the grace of God as witnes S. Aug. in Epist 105. And therefore the Apostle calleth lyfe eternall the grace of God because it is giuen for the revvard of workes done in the state of grace and seing our vvorkes without grace as vnto the lyfe eternall it is attributed to grace as vnto the principall cause that our vvorks merits lyfe eternall And consequently is the exposition of the Psalme that he hath crovvned vs in mercy and compassion not that lyfe eternall is our true waidges of due righteousnes to our vvorkes but because the same vvorkes are done in the mercy of God albeit others expoundes this place so that God vvith his mercy and benefits compasses the iust man about as vvith a crovvne OBIECTION WHen we haue done all which is commanded say we are vnprofitable seruaÌ„ds what we ought to haue done â—e haue done it Therfore to vnprofitable seruands wadges is not due of righteousnes ANSVVER OVr owne workes of themselues in a part to vs are vnprofitable and of no value without God because they draw all their dignity and worth of his grace notwithstaÌ„ding good works layde and ioyned vvith diuine grace are very profitable according to that