to the death of the Crosse Phil. 2. Hence to weary of submitting to God speaks much unnaturall pride yea will not be under God 2. There is little of Christ in such for it was life to Christ and meat and drink Psal. 40.8 Heb. 10.8 John 4.34 Act. 10.38 to obey and it is the Angels life Jsa 6.2 3. Psal. 103.20 Rev. 4.8 and they are neer him who both at once serve and Raigne Rev 22.3 5. much delight to obey speak much of God in the heart Tyre not of your Master examine more untowardnesse to pray to confer to give c. if it be not a cause of deadness and be not a way of backsliding 5. Use. If creatures keep their Covenant-naturall with God shal not the oxe the cran Isa. 1.3 Jer. 8.7 the asse 2 Pet. 2.16 who never had a design of rebellion depon against us in Judgement Ah! what an unnaturall policie the first evill wit of him that sinned from the beginning John 8.44 and whom we follow at the heels it is to please our own wit in Covenant breaking Such as are sick of love for their own wylie time-serving custome If all naturall men in their death bed damne not this folly aske them and they shall speak 6. Use. If God Covenant with us for hyre when his absolutenesse may bear him to command how sinfully soft are our spirits and weak is reason that is broken with a straw when an apple conquers Evahs eye and heart Talents of Silver and a wedge of Gold Achan and Gehazi A drink of water if not at hand in time of thirst make the people murmure against God the more sanctified defecat and spirituall reason be the farther it is above that which crusheth Balaam and Judas The first heavens motion the primum mobile which draws all the rest must be the most excellent and the moving power must be most spirituall it s neither heavinesse which is in stones or clay nor lightnesse in the aire and fire but a more heavenly force which throwes about that body so the motions of sanctified reason which is sweyed and driven by no Argument but from eternity communion with God a Kingdom above time must be most spirituall The dogge is moved with a bone the oxe with hay 7. If no law and poor obedience of ours can buy a communion with God let us examine the peace that flowes from obedience It s purer and more solid peace that flowes from Justification and more immediatly removes the warre between God and us Rom. 5. 1. and comes by a purer and nearer emanation from God and from the ransome of Redemption that is in Christ then that which flowes from created acts of inherent holinesse 2. Our first Adams Element is Justification by works in which we love to live and die The Law is an home-born Idol in us Our apprehensions of our own actings are lively and vigorous the 3000. Acts 2.37 Saul Acts 9.6 and the Jayler Acts 16.30 aske what we shall doe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But it is not the law word of working Rom. 4.2 4 5 6. Rom. 3.20 28. It s much to be dead to the Law and to Law-righteousnesse Gal. 2.19 20. I live not but Christ lives in me Christ 2. is a stranger to us and comes from without gifted righteousnesse comes from heaven Grace only makes us willing debters to grace The pride of self will neither begge nor borrow from nor be debter to a Crucified Saviour when it despiseth him untill the roof of the house fall 3. Seldome do these two concurre deadnesse to works of grace and lively activity in the doing of them Paul attained to both but every man is not Paul 1 Cor. 15.9 10. I laboured more abundantly then they all But fearing and trembling at at that I 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he strikes sail to Christ yet not I but the grace of God in me This pride Paul notes in the Jewes they stouped not nor bowed as inferiours to their Master King or Lord or Father and Husband so the word to the righteousness of God When I self or nature meets with working yea with grace often there followes some loftinesse except it be humbled and mortified I which can weep and say Lord what am I CHAP. VIII What place death hath in the Covenant 2. What such as Cain and Judas are to do in their desperate state 3. And why the LORD is no where called the GOD of Adam Q. WHat room hath death in the Covenant A. Death hath room in the broken Covenant of Works as the Pursevant and Sergeant of revenging justice Hence deaths reign I must die whether I will or not Unwillingnesse to die and bondage through fear of death is the Law-sting in death from which Christ hath delivered us Heb. 2.15 Original sin and death came and entred the world by the Covenant of Works The Covenant of Grace made not death but found it in the world Christ made of an old enemy death a new servant it s now the Kings ferry-boat to carry the children over the water It s a sutable condition to a spirituall state to die being sent for not legally summon'd and to die because I desire to be dissolved Ph. 1.23 not because I must And better it is to summon our selves then to be summoned Though we love heaven too much as a place of pleasure rather then a place of holinesse yet most men would wish a better causey to it then to sleep through th◠cold grave or a dark hole in the earth Q. What room hath life in the Covenant Ans. The Administration of the Law-Covenant is first habituall holinesse of works and then a crown The Administration of grace is first faith and a title to Christ our life and hope of glory and then habituall holinesse begun here and perfected hereafter The Gospel-life is both a reward and a duty of praising and loving eternally in place of all the ten Commands yea of Law and Gospel The Law-life for ought that is revealed is a reward to be purchased by our legall obedience Q. If Adam in the intervall betwixt his fall and the publishing of the blessed Seed was not to despaire but to rely upon God as mighty to save What should such as Judas or Cain do A. The conscience of Cain and of despairers being no authentick Bible nor Judge which can carry the controversie between them and God so long as they are in the way or are viators the Gospel treaty betwixt them and Christ yet standing and not broken off upon the part of Christ they are to cherrish and hold up the Treaty and as it were to force speech out of Christ and to pursue the news of an offered salvation 2. There is no Spirit of God that suggests to them despaire and bids them write themselves in the black roll of Reprobates for though they beleeve hell as the Devils haply beleeve there is a God yet they blow
then the second ADAM No more of this here It is a question the Threatning standing Gen. 2.17 how the active righteousnesse of Christ can be a cause meriting to us life and satisfying the Law when there is no suffering for the breach of the Law which expresly required death in the sinner Not to say that it seems too near to make Christs dying needlesse if his active holinesse do the businesse Nay we cannot so teach CHAP. II. Wherein stands our right to Christ and the satisfaction made for us by Christ 2. Faith is not the cause of our right 3. Christs incarnation and dying are not favours merited by Christ. 4. How Adams sin and Christs righteousnesse are ours OUr right to CHRIST must be considered more accurately then ordinarily it is Whether it floweth from 1. the merite of Christ Or 2. from the grace of predestination Or 3. faith in Christ. 1. Conclusion Grace is either objectivè out of us as the free love of God having mercy on whom he will Or subjectivè merited by Christ to us and bestowed upon us As touching our right to God as incarnate 2. As dying for us 3. As his satisfaction is made ours are of diverse considerations For if God out of free love sent his Son in the world Joh. 3.16 and if he out of free-grace that separateth the race of man from Angels took upon him the nature of man to wit of Abraham and not the nature of Angels Heb. 2.16 Then sure by the merits of Christs death it cannot come that God came in the flesh to save sinners For the effect cannot but come from the cause but the cause flowes not from the effect nor is the effect to wit Christs Incarnation and his dying the cause of that love and free-grace of God which moved God to send his Son in the flesh but posterior unto and latter then that love for because he loved us he sent his Son in the flesh to die for us 2. This cannot then be true Christ by his dying for the Elect merited and deserved that God should be made Man for us for this should be true also by the blood of Christ and by the redemption that is in Christ God sent his Son in the flesh and the Son took on him our nature by the blood of the Covenant nor can this be true Christ merited by his death that he should die for us for so it should be true that Christ by his blood shed his blood for us Where as because he loved his Church freely he gave himself for her Eph. 5.15 Who loved me and gave himself for me Gal. 2.20 Hence 1. though grace be the cause of grace as because he of grace ordained us to glory therefore of grace he calls and because of free-grace he calls of free-grace he carries on his work and gives of grace perseverance and glory Yet there is a fountain-grace of election to glory which hath no cause nor merit not the merit of Christ for its cause but is the cause of causes and of Christs merits As one fire may produce another but the element of fire was not produced by another element of fire but by God in creation And one Vine Tree brings forth another but the first Vine Tree was created by the Lord only 2. Conclus Nor have we to speak acurately right to Christs satisfaction nor to his righteousnesse by faith 1. Because the Lords free-grace in laying our sins on Christ Isa. 53.6 and his making him sin for us 2 Cor. 5.21 does rather give the right to his satisfaction God would have Christ to stand for so many chosen of God upon the Crosse and for no other 1 Cor. 1.30 Ye are of him through Jesus Christ who is made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of God to us wisedom and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption Nor is there any act of faith interveening by which Christ became our surety and ransone-payer upon the Crosse and not the surety of others 2. It is ordinary to our Divines to say by faith we do apply Christ and his righteousnesse but if we speak properly application is possession and a putting on of Christ and his righteousnesse Now title or Law-right to an inheritance and possession of it are different natures and have different causes but faith gives not law-right to Christ and his righteousnesse not so much as instrumentally My receiving with my hand gold my eating and drinking the flesh and blood of Christ by faith Joh. 6.53 54 c. doth presuppone some right to that gold but no man can say that receiving of gold and eating of bread and putting on of garments gives a man right to gold bread or garments He that possâ—sseth an inheritance hath some right to the inheritance by birth buying purchase or gift the possession in its nature and causes may be unjust yet it is possession Nor can it be shown what causative influence even instrumentall faith hath in our Law-right to Christs satisfaction and righteousnesse except it were a meritorious cause of our right by way of instrument which can hardly be said 3. We may ask how Christ so died for the Reprobate as his death is a remedie applicable to them by the ordination of God so as they shall have life eternall if they believe For 1. there is either a jus and a Law-right to pardon and life eternall merited bâ— Christs death to the Reprobate or no such thing is merited If neither be procured by Christs merite the Patrons of this way shall say there is no serious offer made to them yea there is a jus a title to life eternall and remission which all the reprobate may challenge even a right to remission and life eternall so they beleeve Well then it is the same right conditional to life and pardon which is purchased to the Elect yea this must be purchased whether they believe or not Then there is no more in the kind of the Law-right to Redemption and life eternall and remission of sins purchased to Peter then to Judas or Cain And therefore hath Christ bestowed as much tender love in dying for the Reprobate as in dying for his friends And Christ saith there is no greater love then this Joh. 15.13 As for the efficacious intention of applying of Christs death to Peter when as God had no such intention of applying it to Judas that is an act of eternall predestination not a fruit of Christs death and as for the grace of beleeving it was purchased to all Reprobate and Elect only the Lord applyes not his death and bestowes not the grace of beleeving upon the Reprobate but for right to faith to remission to perseverance to life eternall this right must be purchased but faith it self is never bestowed upon them But there is a ransome of blood given for faith and purchased by CHRISTS merit But CHRIST is never called the Head of all men Elect and Reprobate but the Head of the Body
we are gifted with a life of more worth then many acres of Vineyards They declare therefore that there is much of the first Adam in them little of the second Who would conquesse again the many lands that our first father Adam sold and joyn house to house and lay field to field till there be no place and disinherit all others as if they were bastard heirs and themselves the only righteous heirs of Adam that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth Isa. 5.8 And the more spiritual any be the more are they above the nothing world Mortality may be called supernaturall to the earthie part of Adam since it is not naturally due to a body of earth to claim life for ever Though immortality be due to whole Adam consisting of soul and body and endued with the image of God For the soul cannot die But if we speak of such a life to wit of a heavenly communion with God as Adam was a comprehensor or one who is supposed now to have runne well and won the Gold and the Crown such a life was due to Adam not by nature but by promise Adam in his first state was not predestinate to a law glory and to influences of God to carry him on to persevere Nor could he blesse God that he was chosen before the foundation of the world to be Law holy as Eph. 1.3 What Was not then Adam predestinated to life eternall through Jesus Christ He was But not as a publick person representing all his sons but as another single person as Abraham or Jacob for Gospel predestination is not of the nature but of this or that person Therefore were we not predestinat to life eternall in him but in Christ Rom. 8.29 30. Therefore Adam fell from the state of Law-life both totally and finally but not from the state of Gospel election to glory For the Lord â—ad in the Law-dispensation a love designe to set up a Theatre and stage of free grace And that the way of works should be a time-dispensation like a summer-house to be demolished again As if the Lord had an aime that works and nature should be a transient but no standing Court for righteousnesse Hence it is now the reliques of an old standing Court and the Law is a day of assyse for condemning of malefactors who will acknowledge no Tribunall of grace but only of works And it is a just Court to terrifie robbers to awe borderers and loose men but to beleevers it is now a Court for a far other end CHAP. III. What is the intent and sense of the threatning Gen. 2.17 In the day thou eats thou shalt die And Gen. 3.20 Dust thou art c. WE must distinguish between the intent of the threatner and the intent and sense of the threatning Law-threatnings may be well exponed by the execution of them upon persons against whom they are denounced As 1 King 11.30 compared with 1 King 12.15 16. Ten Tribes are taken from Davids house according to the Word of the Lord. Because therefore the threatning of death was executed upon Christ 1 Pet. 3.18 Gal. 3.10 11 12 13 14. then must the threatning Gen. 2.17 Deut. 27.26 have been intended against the Man Christ and because beleevers die as all do Heb. 9.27 the threatning must have been intended against them also for that they sinned in Adam and because it is out of question that the reprobate die the first and second death the threatning must also have been intended against them And therefore in the intent of the threatner the threatning was mixed partly Legall partly Evangelick According to the respective persons that the Lord had in his eye He had therefore in his heart both Law and Gospel It is therefore to no purpose to aske what kind of death and whether purely legall which the Lord threatned to Adam For the Question supposeth that the Covenant of Works was to stand and that the Lord was to deny a Saviour to fallen man But we may say what death the Lord actually inflicts that death he intended to inflict nor did the Lord decree to inflict a meerly legall death personall first and second upon Adam and all his race Obj. Adam was to believe he should certainly die For so was the threatning Gen. 2.17 if he should sin or then we must say that Adam was to beleeve he should not actually die the latter cannot be said for then he was to believe the contradicent of the Lords true threatning which was the lie of the Serpent Gen. 3. Ans. He was to beleeve neither of the twain according to the event for there are two sort of threatnings some pure and only threatnings which reveal to us what God may in Law do but not what he hath decreed and intended actu secundo quoad eventum to do and bring to passe These threatnings contain some condition either expressed in other Scripture or then reserved in the mind of the Lord. 1. Because the Lord so threatned Adam as he remained free and absolute either to inflict the punishment or to provide an Evangelick remedy even as Solomon 1 King 2.37 saith to Shimei in the day thou passest over the brook Kidron thou shalt surely die that is thou shalt be guilty of death reus mortis Yet it cannot be denyed but Solomon reserved his own Kingly power either to pardon Shimei or to soften or change the sentence 2. The words of the Law do reveal what the Magistrate may do jure and what the guilty deserves by the Law but do not â—eveal the intention and absolute decree of the Law-giver and what punishment actually quoad eventum shall be inflicted upon the guilty and what shall come to pass as a thing decreed of the Lord So Gen. 9.6 the Murtherer shall die by the Sword of the Magistrate and Exod. 22.18 19 20. the Witch the man that lyes with a beast he that sacrifices to a strange god shall die the death jure merito and by Law-deserving but it followeth not but such as commit these abominations do live as is clear in the Kings of Assyria Chaldaea and many of Israel who were not put to death but lived quoad eventum though contrary to the Word of God 3. The expresse Precepts of the Decalogue Thou shalt have no other gods before me c. Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not steal c. do shew what in Law we ought not to do but not what actually shall come to passe For there be not a few who do actually quoad eventum worship strange gods kill and steal But there are other threatnings which are both threatnings and also Prophesies and these reveal both the Law and the fact and what the Law-giver may jure and in Law inflict and what shall actually come to passe upon the transgressours if they continue in impenitency Rom. 2.1.2 3 Rom. 1.18 1 Cor. 6.9 10. Obj. Then in
all threatnings and promises we are not to believe that though we sin we shall actually quoad eventum die and though we obey and beleeve wee are not to beleeve that GOD shall fulfill his promise and that our salvation shall come to passe only we are to believe jure that we deserve to die and that we shall have eternall life jure promissionis but not actually and according to the event Answ. Something is to be said of the threatnings then of the promises As touching the sense we are to beleeve In the threatnings conditionall as yet fourty days and Nineveh shall be destroyed and in that day thou eats thou shalt surely die in thy person and all thine the first and second death we are not to believe the event nor is it carnall security not to beleeve such an event we are only to have a godly fear and to tremble at the dreadfuâ—l deserving of such threatnings legall as alway are to be exponed and beleeved by all within the Visible Church with an Evangelick exception of repentance If therefore Adam did beleeve that he and all his should in their own persons actually suffer the first and second death and that irrecoverably he had no warrand for any such belief and the like may be said of Nineveh For when the Lord said in the day that thou eats thou shalt die the first and second death thou and all thy children personally His meaning was except I provide an Evangelick remedy and a Saviour Godly fear trembles more at the darkning of the glory of the Lord in a broken Law then at the event of inflicted wrath were it even Hells fire Obj. Adam was to beleeve no such exception Answ. True Because it was not revealed nor was he to beleeve the contrary that he should irrecoverably and eternally perish because that was not revealed But the threatning of the Law doth not deny the Evangelick remedy as it neither doth affirme it Obj. Then was Adam to believe it was true which the Serpent said ye shall not surely die quoad eventum but ye shall be as Gods living and knowing good and evill Ans. Neither doth that follow for in the meaning of the liar it was not true that they should not die either by deserving for Satan brangles the equity and righteousness of the Law and threatning or actually and in the event for both were false and neither revealed and faith is not to go beyond what is revealed of God And Sathan disputed against both the equity of the threatning as if it had been unjust in Law and against the event as a fiction and a thing that should not come to passe in the event which indeed did not come to passe but not according to the Serpents lying and false principles Obj. Was then Adam to despair and to beleeve nothing of a Saviour Ans. He was not obliged to despaire but to rely by vertue of the first Commandement of the Decalogue upon God infinitly powerfull mercifull gracious and wise to save for that was revealed and written in his heart and that is far from despairing But in the intervall between the fall and the Lords publishing the blessed Gospel and news of the seed to come he was so to trust in God for possible deliverance in generall as the Law of Nature requireth but he was to beleeve nothing of unrevealed particulars far lesse of the mystery of the Gospel which was kept secret since the world began Rom. 16.25 Obj. Then may also the damned in Hell who are not loosed from their obligation to the Law of Nature and the first Command be obliged to rely on an infinite and Almighty God for their deliverance for they are not obliged to despair nor is there an obligation to any sin Ans. There is not the like reason for though the damned be not loosed from the Law of Nature but are to rely upon God in his whole al-sufficiency yet with exception of his revealed Justice and Truth Now he hes expresly revealed that their worm never dieth and their fire never goeth out And to believe that is not to despaire Obj. What are then such Heathens to beleeve as touching that threatning who never heard of the Gospel Ans. They are under the Law of Nature and to beleeve that sin deserves wrath according to the infinitnesse of the Majesty against whom it is committed and to obey the Law of Nature and read the Book of the Creation carefully But and if the news and rumor of a Saviour come to their ears their sin cannot but be Evangelick in not pursuing the reality and truth of such a soveraign remedy Yet it is not to be thought that though the Gospel be come to all Nations Rom. 16.26 that that is to be meant 1. Of every Generation of all Nations Or 2. of the individuall persons either young or come to age of every Nation under Heaven experience and Scripture speaketh against both Obj. But is not the Covenant of Grace contrary to the Law and Covenant of Works Answ. A diversity there is but contrary wills in the holy Lord cannot be asserted Yea the Gospel may be proven out of the Law and from the first Commandement of the Decalogue if any act of the Lords free will and infinite wisedome shall be added to prove the Assumption So If the first Command teach that God is infinitely wise mercifull gracious just and able to save then if so it please him he shall save But the first Command teacheth the former And the Gospel revealing the unsearchable riches of Christ Eph. 3.8 expresly saith so much Ergo. As to the promises they contain not only the jus equity and goodnesse of the thing promised but also that the Lord shall actually perform yea and intends to perform what he hath promised upon condition that we perform the required condition And in this the promises differ not a little from these threatnings that are only threatnings of what God may do in Law but not from these threatnings which are both threatnings and also Propheticall predictions of what shall come to passe therefore must we here difference betwixt threatnings and such and such threatnings The promises are considered as they are Preached and anunciated to all within the Visible Church and as they are made in the intention of God with the Elect and Sons of the promise The same way the threatnings admit of a two-fold consideration The promises to the Elect as intended of God reveal that both the Lord minds to give the blessing promised and the condition that is grace to perform the condition and so they are promises Evangelick both in the matter and in the intention of the Lord But as proponed to the reprobate who are alwayes from their birth to their death under a Covenant of Works really as touching the LORDS holy Decree they are materially Evangelick promises but formally and in the Lords intention legall as every dispensation to
the Lord had followed Adams obedience with no reward at all For man as a creature owes himself to God and as sweetly and pithily Anselme saith as a redeemed one I owe my self and more then my self to thee because thou gave thy self who art so farre more then my self for me and thou promises thy self to me Now God who is more and greater then Adam promised himself to be enjoyed by Adam if he should continue in obedience For what can the highest goodnesse sayeth he give to one that loves it but it self 3. If God of justice give Adam life Adam might compell God to pay what he oweth him else he should be unjust But the creature can lay no necessitie on the Creator either to work without himself nor can he cause him to will 4. The proper work of merite saith great Bradwardine and of him that works must go before the wages in time or in order of nature And if the worker receive its operation and working for wadge from God first and by his vertue and help continue in operation and working he cannot condignely merit at the hand of God but is rather more in Gods debt after his working then before his working because he bountifullie receives more good from God then before especially because he gives nothing proper of his own to God but gives to God his own good But no man first acts for God for God is the first actor and mover in every action and motion As that saith Who gave first to the Lord and it shall be recompensed him 5. If this was yesterday just that life eternall is due to Adam for his work before God made it just and due then from Eternitie and before any decree of God it was just and due Certainlie God upon the same reason was debtour to make such a Covenant that was just before he made it just And this is no Covenant of God for God not making the justice of the Covenant and the juâ—t connexion between work and wadge he cannot be the Author of the Covenant But neither is Adam the Author of the justice nor of the just Covenant Upon the same ground it was then an everlasting justice without and before God from Eternitie Non datur justum prius primo justo 6. If God did more for Adam then he can recompence God for it as the Father hath done to the Son then he could not merit at the hand of God But God did more to Adam in giving to him being faculties mind will affections power habites his blessed Image then Adam can never be in a condition in which he can recompence God or give him more annuall and usurie in his acting of obedience then the stock was he received in proportion As the Son can never give the Father in recompence so much or the captive ransomed from death can never give to his ransome payer who bought him so much as the one and the other shall no more be under an obligation and debt of love and service to father and ransomer then to a stranger that they never knew Nor could Adam thus be freed of God so as he should be owing nothing to him If any say God may freely forgive all this obligation and debt To which Bradwardine Answers well 1. The forgiving of the debt when the debtor hath nothing to pay is a greater debt taken on 2. God saith he may forgive so in regard of actuall obligation that he is not oblidged ad aliquid faciendum sub poena peccati to do any thing under the pain or punishment of sin as the hireling is obleiged to work when he hath made a Covenant to work and so we are not oblidged to do as much as we can for God But in regard of habituall obligation God cannot forgive the debt that the reasonable creature owes to God for so he might dispence with this that the reasonable creature owe no obedience to God suppose he should command it which is impossible They seeme therefore with eyes of flesh to look upon God who say that God by necessitie of justice must punish sin yea that the most High cannot be God except he punish sin and that he should not be God if all his Lawes imposed upon men were only promissorie and void of all threatnings What could not God have said eat not of the tree of knowledge for if ye eat not your obedience shall be rewarded with life eternall and no more might he not have laid aside all threatning What Scripture or reason teacheth to say that God if he create a reasonable creature and under a morall dependencie which it hath and must have of God then must God by necessitie of nature punish the sinner yea so as if he punish not he should not be God nor just but must fall from his naturall dominion except he make penall laws and so he should not be God except he say to Adam if thou eat thou shalt die or shalt be punished for eating but this is not proven by one word except this the reasonable creature is not nor cannot be subject to God Creator except God punish the sinner But that is denyed Adam should have had a Morall dependance upon God and God should have been God and essentially just if sin had never come into the World and if God had kept Adam under a Morall Law as he did the Elect Angels who never felt or knew the fruit of a Morall Law broken and transgressed And God if he imposed any penall Law upon the Elect Angels as penall which shall be an hard work to prove yet had a naturall dominion over the Elect Angels and suppose no Law but only a rewarding and remunerative Law had been over their heads should God be no God in that case and if any deny that God hath a perfect dominion over the Elect Angels he is not worthy to be refuted 2. Shew me in all the Old or New Testament any penall Law of active obediencâ— as penall imposed upon the man Christ or where is it written If the Man Christ sin he shall eternally die I tremble at such expressions Is the Lord therefore not the Lord and hath the Lord fallen from his naturall dominion over his Son the Man Christ Or 3 will any man deny but the Lord might justly have laid upon all men and upon the Elect Angels a Law only remunerative not penall at all a Law only with the promise of a reward and void of all threatning of death first or second or any other punishment and yet he should have been the Lord and had a naturall dominion over Angels the Man Christ and all mankind 3 Suppose the Lord had never imposed the Law penall forbidding the sin against the Holy Ghost upon the Elect beleevers nor any other penall Law but by vertue of the most sufficient ransome of the Blood of God payed for man he had made them now after the fall as the
confirmed Angels and holy as the Man Christ and brought them so to glory should he not have been God in that case and should he have lost his naturall dominion over men in that case 4. The dominion of God over men is not only in one particular of penall Laws it is in remunerative Laws also in giving predeterminating influences to obey and persevere in obedience in not leading into temptation in hyring and alluring us to serve God in terrifying men with examples of the Lords Judgements on others he spared not the Angels c. 2 Pet. 2.4 Jud. 6. and therefore to say that God falls from his naturall dominion over man and leaves off to be God except he impose penall Laws upon men is first an errour in Logick à negatione speciei ad negationem generis nulla est consequentia If God have not a dominion over man in one particular of penall Laws he falls from his whole dominion naturall in other things It is an undue inference 2. It cannot be but too darring to tye the blessed God-head and his essentiall dominion over man to only making of penall Laws it smells of Scripturelesse boldnesse with the most High and limits the Holy One that he cannot be God except he be God in our way And saith he hath no way to preserve his glory but by creating a Hell And therefore let that stand as an unproven position since it hath no probation The reason that is given is as weak as the weak conclusion Though water may bear up water yet it cannot support the earth For 1. it saith if man be created a reasonable creature under a Law he may sin intercidi potuit obedientiâ and he may be created under a Law with perfect morall dependence upon God Creator as the Elect Angels and the Man Christ and yet never sin and yet God falls not from his dominion and leaves not off to be God 2. This lookes somewhat the Arminian way that man cannot be under the subjection of properly so called Morall obedience except his will be indifferent as Adams was to stand or fall to run to Heaven or Hell which indeed saith that the most perfect obedience of Christ who was obedient to the death Phil. 2.8 and delighted to do the will of God Psal. 40.8 John 4.34 is no proper obedience that is perfect obedience is not proper obedience And that obedience of Elect Angels the samplar of our obedience Mat. 6.10 Isa. 6.2 3. Psal. 103.20 is not proper obedience 3. Whereas it is said if man sin his morall dependency cannot stand except God punish him but so not only God shall not be God nor have dominion over man except he impose a penall Law upon man but he shall not be God except he actually punish man or his surety Christ. But the same pen saith that the out-goings of justice are free that is to say it is free to God to punish sin and yet he falls from his naturall dominion over man and leaves off to be God if he punish not sin But we do deny that God falls from his naturall dominion over man though he never impose a penall Law upon him and never punish and desire that this may be proven nor is it imaginable how God by necessity of nature must punish sin And yet in the way measure and degree of punishment and in the time when he can use moderation Which is as good as to say the fire must by necessity of nature burn the Sun cast light But the fire hath free will to burn when it pleaseth and at this time and not at this time and the Sun must shine by necessity of nature but it is free to shine at ten hours of the day and not at twelve and it may shine as bright as the Sun or as dimme as the Moon Or God the Father loves himself but it is free to him to love himself to day not to morrow and to love himself so much not so much And so he may say God is so mercifull and just to day as he may be no merciful no just to morrow and God is infinitly mercifull and just and yet he is lesse mercifull and more mercifull essentially according to his good pleasure which are speaking contradictions Yea this is that which misjudging Suarez saith that the creature may do a reall injurie to God and take away from God jus Dei ad gloriam his right to glory but the truth is the creature by sin darkeneth or overcloudeth his declarative glory but can take away no essentiall glory nor any reall right or reall good from God so Elihu Job 39.6 If thou sinnest what dost thou against him If thy transgressions be multiplied what dost thou to him To take his declarative glory from God is no lose to him no more then it is lose to the Sun that ye hinder it to shine upon the wall when yet ye take no light from the Sun for it shines upon an interposed body Job 35.8 Thy wickednesse may hurt a man as thou art and thy righteousnesse may profite the Son of man It is needfull say some that God preserve his own glory safe but if sin be without infliction of punishment it is impossible that he can defend his owâ— glory Ergo of necessity he must punish sin The proposition is out of controversie for all confesse that God must preserve his own glory 〈◊〉 by necessity of nature he must do so quoniam seipsum non potest non amare Because he cannot but love himself and he hath said my glory will I not give to another To this is answered the glory internall eternall and essentiall to God the Lord must defend and love as he loves himself by necâ—ssity of nature and if any say that the egressions and out-goings of God to defend and love his own essentiall Glory and his own holy Nature so as he may use moderation in the degrees and time of these and he may love himself and his own essentiall glory more or lesse and touching the time he may delay to love himself and he may love himself and his own essentiall glory to morrow not to day As the Author sayes the out-goings of revenging justice are moderated in punishing he speaks wonders and things unworthy of God The place Isa. 42. speaks not of this glory for no idol no creature can more take away from the Almighty this essentiall glory of God nor his blessed Nature can cease to be but there is a glory declarative of pardoning mercie as well as of revenging justice It must be a carnall conception and a new dream that God by necessity of nature loves himself as cloathed with revenging justice or as just and his own glory of revenging justice but that God loves himself as mercifull and ready to forgive or his own glory of pardoning mercie freely and by no necessity of nature Which the Author must say for the place Isa. 45.
it be a doubt to me if the Covenant of Works had stooden and Adam and all his had fulfilled it perfectly if the Lord should weigh in an even ballance by ounce weights our poor labour and great reward of Glory for had he entered such a market the losse had been ours we could not have obtained life eternall that way for our stock of time-working should have dryed up The vertue of justice stands in the equality of that which is given and received Now there is a two-fold equality one rei ad rem between thing and thing ane Arithmetick justice so many ounces of naturall actings and the same number of ounces of grace and glory This commutative justice is not in God as the soundest and learned'st School men teach There is another justice of proportion duarum rerum ad duas alias res of two things proportionally answering to two things distributive justice is this and it keeps a Geometricall proportion Augustine with Scripture saith God is become our debter not by receiving any thing from us but by promising what he pleaseth 2. It followes from the Parable that Gods bargaining with us depends not upon the equality between thing and thing the work and the wage But upon his own free pleasure of disposing of his own And it is the froathinesse of our nature to judge the penny of Glory that we get by labouring to be our own whereas after the promise and after we have fulfilled the condition it is not ours but Gods and he calls it his own and it is to be disposed on by the Lords free-grace Friend may not I do with mine own what I please Mat. 20.15 2. No promise as a promise can give us a proper right by way of strict justice to plead with God 1. A promise of grace is a free promise and no man can say because God promises the new heart to most undeserving men that are of a stony heart and doe profane his holy name amongst the Gentiles that therefore it is just by condignitie of the thing that a new heart should be given to them that are foolish disobedient and serving diverse lusts The farrest that hard faced Jesuits go in this is to tell us of the poor penny of the merit of congruity for the right weight of the summe and thousands of saving grace which Papists have refused as ashamed thereof 3. If a promise as a promise should make an equalitie between one thing and another and so lay a band of strict commutative justice upon God then should every promise do the like quod convenit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 convenit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but that cannot be said For then if God should promise glory of ten thousand millions of degrees above the glory that Angels and men now injoy for speaking one good word that should be a free promise but that promise should not make an equality between so hudge and rich a reward of glory and so hungry and poor a work as the speaking of a good word so as God should fail of justice if he should deny a reward so great for so small a work For the denying thereof should be against the veracitie and faithfulnesse of God if he should not fulfill his promise but he should not fail against strict justice either in not rewarding the work with a condigne reward or in not giving to the man that spake the good word his own For there is no just equality between work and wage here Nor can ever so feckless a work or all the works of men and Angels make the glory of life everlasting our own For glory remains ever the proper gift of God and under his dominion 4. A promise is by order of time or nature latter and posterior to the good thing promised as words of truth are latter to things and things have the same valor and worth before and after the promise yea if one promise to give for a plot of ground a summe of money of value five hundred times above the worth of that plot of ground that promise can not make the unequall and unjust price to be a just and equall price Even so the promise of God to give eternall life to the obedience of Adam can make no equality of strict justice between the reward and the wage For the reward promised for the wages is equall and just before the promise and ex naturâ rei and so must lay bands on the Lord so as he cannot do contrair unto it which is against all reason And who gave first to the Lord and it shall be recompensed to him and he that gave first to him man or Angel must give his own or then it is no giving which he received not from God either created being or gift or work for any uncreated gift none can give to him as is said 2. What is given is amongst the all things that are of him as the efficient and to him as the last end and through him as the conserver of all and so can be no gift to him Rom 11.36 And what God of free goodnesse decrees to do that he may decree not to do and things falling under his decree are not necessary he cannot decree that man should be a reasonable creature for it involves a contradiction to be a man and not to be a reasonable creature But no shadow of contradiction there is for the Lord to forbid to eat and to forbid to eat under a punishment And the not created world it being from eternity nothing and a non ens could not have any jus or right to plead that God would stand to what he decreed and give being and create a world for if the Lord should not give being to it and create what he had decreed from eternity to create he should fail against his own unchangeable Nature but should do no unjustice to an uncreated world except we say God should be unjust if he had not created the world For being of justice is due to the world and God refuses to pay the debt of being to the uncreated world which is non-sense And upon the same ground if he should annihilat the world or take away life from living things he should be unjust It is safer therefore to say that God oweth the creature nothing but we are his debtors for service and praises while we have any being 4. Use. If God of his free will so placed Adam to reward his obedience We think hard to serve God for wages and to be placed in a condition of obedience Evah and we with her sucking the same milk thirst after such lawlesse Independency to be from Gen. 3.5 6. under God Whereas Adam and Angel-courtiers that have wings to obey and the Noble and High Heir who learned obedience through the things he suffered were in this condition and Christ a King in the shape of a Servant was obedient to death
eternall condemnation as Arminius disp pub 7. th 16.3 and the Scripture saith infants are guilty of this sin Eph. 2.3 Rom. 5. Psal. 51.5 Job 14.4 As also Christ must not have died for the sins of Infants if there be no sin in them they need not the ransome of Christs Blood The other bastard ground is the naturall antecedent desire and love of God to have all saved moved him say they to make this Covenant of Grace with all But this makes away free-grace and changes God as the blind Talmud which saith God hath a secret place in which he afflicts himself because he burnt the Temple and delivered the Jews to captivitie As also the Lord remembring the captivity of the Jews and their desolation he powres out two tears every day in the Sea or Ocean and for grief smites his breasts with both his hands And the Alcoran saith that God and the Angels wish well to Mahomet but cannot free him from death So made the Heathen their Jupiter to deplore the destinies which he could not amend And what is this but to say God hath passionate desires to have all Elect and Reprobat Men and Angels to obey and be eternally saved but he cannot help the matter and therefore must upon the same account be sorrowfull and mourn that he cannot get all saved which destroyes the power of grace and restrains the out-goings of free-love CHAP. XI The three-fold Covenant considered 2. The Law pressed upon Israel was not a Covenant of Works but a darker dispensation of Grace 3. The three-fold Covenant of Arminians refuted 4. Diverse considerations of the Law and the Gospel THere be who hold that there be three Covenants 1. A Covenant of Nature whereby God as Creator required perfect obedience from Adam in Paradice with promise of life and threatning of death 2. The Covenant of Grace whereby he promises life and forgivenesse in Christs Blood to believers 3. A subservient Covenant made 1. With Israel not witâ— Adam and all mankinde 2. For a time with Israel not for ever as the naturall Covenant 3. In Mount Sinai not in Paradice 4. To terrifie and keep in bondage the other from an inward principle required obedience 5. To restrain Israel from outward sins to prove the people that the fear of God might be before their eyes that they should not sin So they expound Exo. 20.20 the other Covenant was to restrain from all sin Yea and so was that on Mount Sinai to do all that are written in the Book of the Law Deut. 27.26 Deut. 28.1 2 3 4. c. to that same end to love God with all the heart and with all the soul Deut. 10.12 Deut. 5.1 2 3. Deut. 6.1 2 3. Deut. 5.29 Deut. 6.5 With all the heart with all the soul with all the might which is expounded by Christ Mat. 22.37 Luke 10.27 in as full a hight of perfection as ever was required of Adam 6. It was written to Israel in Tables of stone The naturall Covenant was written in the heart so was there a circumcised heart promised to Israel Deut. 30.6 though sparingly 7. It was say they given by the Mediator Moses as that of nature was without a Mediator Yea Moses was the Typical Mediator of the young Covenant of Grace The differences between the subservient Covenant and that of Grace 1. In the subservient God only approves righteousnesse and condemnes sin in that of Grace he pardons and renues Ans. Acts 15.11 We beleeve through the Grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved even as they under that Covenant Acts 10.43 To him gave all the Prophets witnesse that through his Name whosoever beleeveth in him shall receive remission of sins Abraham and David were justified in that sin was not imputed to them not by works Rom. 4.1 2 3 6 7 8 9 c. Gen. 15.6 Psal. 32.1.2.5 I said I will confesse my transgression and thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin Isa. 4325. I euen I am he that blots out thy transgressions for my own sake and I will not remember thy sins So David was a man according to the heart of God So Asa Josiah Jehoshaphat Samuel Baruch Gedeon Daniel the Prophets under that subservient Covenant except they be under a fourth Covenant were renued justified saved by faith Heb. 11. as under a Covenant of Grace 2. The former was do and live this was believe and live Ans. Doing and living was but a shuting them up under the Law that they might flee to Christ in whom they beleeved else the fathers must be saved and justified by works contrair to Rom. 2. Rom. 4. Heb. 11. 3. In antiquity the former came in as added 430. years after the promise of grace Gal. 3.17 Ans. True but he speaks of the Covenant in Sinai according to the strict Law part which could not save and so its different But that proves not two Covenants 4. In the former is compulsion and the Spirit of bondage in this heart inclining freedom and the Spirit of Adoption Ans. Yet the differences are accidentall there was a legall awing of the hearts as if they had been Servants yet Heirs and Sons they were Gal. 4.1 2. The whole Book of the Proverbs spake to the Godly as to Adopted Sons They were beleevers Heb. 11. Rom. 4. Acts 10.43 and so Sons as touching a spirituall state John 1.11 12. In regard of Oeconomie it was somewhat more rigid and legall they were restrained as servants Yet it was the Covenant of Grace by which beleeving Jews were justified and saved Acts 15. v. 11. Acts 10.43 5. In the former man is dead in this man is humbled for sinne Answ. Legally dead except they would flee to Christ and legally condemned but there was true humiliation for sins under that Covenant As David Josiah Hezekiah and all beleevers then as now were pardoned and justified 6. In the former there are commands not strength but here there be promises and grace given Ans. The full abundance of grace and of a new heart was reserved untill now And the Law could not make perfect nor give pardon in the blood of beasts as touching that legall dispensation But both grace the Spirit pardon righteousnesse and life were received and beleeved by looking on Christ to come 7. In the former Canaan was promised in this Heaven Ans. Canaan is promised only but sacramentally and that was a poedagogicall promise for the infancie of that Church but a type which was then in that Covenant and is not now make not two Covenants one then and another now Except ye say there was then a Lamb in the Passeover which was a Type of Christ to come and there is now no such Type because the body is come and Christ the true High Priest offered himself Therefore there are two Christs one then to come another now who hath come already The Lords dispensation with Israel is often called a Covenant now
Covenant Christ and the Apostles are more sparing in denouncing temporall plagues in the New Testament Christ sayeth the worme never dieth the fire never goeth out the Hypocrite is to be bound hand and foot and cansten into utter darknesse Math. 22.12 and the Holy Ghost such shall not inherite the Kingdome of Heaven 1 Cor. 6 9. Eph. 5.5 the Apostate is near a curse his end burning Heb. 8.6 he is to look for judgement and firie indignation Heb. 10.27 to some is reserved the blacknesse of darknesse for ever Jude 7. the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone which is the second death Rev. 21.8 Because 1. Temporall blessings and curses are more legall and more easily believed when the light was dimmer then now when light is larger convictions stronger and men are more apâ— to believe Everlasting wrath 2. It s a more Gospel way to bear in the threatning of Everlasting wrath then of Temporall rods 3. Desertions and tryalls under the Law were more legall and sharp and sad upon David Ezekiah Job Jeremiah Heman Psal. 6. Psal. 38. Psal. 77. Psal. 102. Psal. 88. Isa. 38. Jer. 20. But it is to be thought that in regard the day now hath dawne the Gospel desertions coeteris paribus for the aboundance of light are more sharp nearer to dispaire see 2 Cor. 1.8 We were pressed out of measure above strength in so much that we despaired even of life having received the sentence of death It s a doubt if Paul should be so pressed by a sentence of temporarie death Though there be a larger measure of faith to bear up the soul under the New Testament but it would appear there is more of hell now then under that dispensation and that the Gospel despair of Judas and of these that cry for mountains and hills to cover them Luke 23.29 30. is more intollerable under the Gospel 4. There is a more numerous company of these who have not loved their lives to the death and the Martyres that suffered more exquisite torments for Christ under the persecuting Emperours and reigne of Antichrist then ever before the constraining love of Christ which is stronger then death or hell hath so swallowed up all temporarie sufferings the Spirit hath such influence on the flesh 5. When the world seeks wisdome 1 Cor. 1. and Rabbies of the Jews and learning and artes abound all the world over as the profound Philosophers of the Gentiles the wonders of nature prove yet not many wise are called 1 Cor. 3.21 26 27. and unlettered and ignorant are in number for Godly spirituall knowledge farre beyond the Godly learned and make that true Esa. 11.9 The earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the Sea and Isa. 30.26 And the light of the Moon shall be as the light of the Sun and the light of the Sun shall be as the light of seven dayes so hath the Lord darkned carnall learning though of it self the good gift of God with the shining of spirituall wiâ—edome in the fools of the world for so are they judged 1 Cor. 1.27 Q. 3. What are the speciall differences of one under the Covenant of Works and of one under the Covenant of Grace Answ 1. The dominion and kingly power of sin to condemn and judge to eternall wrath and also to command against all shaddow of reason such crying sins 1 Cor. 6.9 10. Rom. 1.29 30. Gal. 5.20 21. Eph. 4.17 18 19. Col 3.5 1 Tim. 1.9 Rev. 21.8 Rev. 22.15 16. without exception makes an universall slave for as far as the lusts of sin go as far goes the dominion of sin and this is to be under the Law Rom. 6.14 2. There is subjection to the Law when men are agents in resigning and giving themselves over or offer themselves as sacrifices at the altar or servants that tender their service to their masters Rom. 6.16 to sin which hath strength from the Law to condemne 1 Cor. 15.56 and to be a captive is not intended but comes on by occasionall force Rom. 7. such are patients as it were But 3. Then they are sinnes servants when there is a Law of sin and a Covenant as there is between a master and a servant And 2. full consent and men give themselves and willingly commit and deliver themselves the word spoken of Christs willingnesse to offer himself for us Eph. 5.25 and to God the Judge 1. Pet. 2.23 to commit filthinesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in aboundance with greedinesse Esa. 9.19 when the renued part enters not a spirituall protestation on the contrare see Rom. 7.19 the carnall protestation entered by naturall reason is not the protestation of the renued will and affections against the will and affections but will against will makes a division of the practicall act and division weakens the half is lesse then the whole especially when half and half are contrare half fire and half water makes the burning lesse half light half darknesse makes twylight it s not perfect day light yea and it not only lesseneth but weakneth yea and alters the kind of the morall act no reason can admit that when a merchand casts his goods in the sea for fear of shipwrake that he does an act of prodigalitie or wastrie It wants delight and full consent Herods killing of John Baptist though he did it with sorrow yet was no compelled nor devided action between renued affection and unrenued affection And so it was no protestation in favour of the Law of God for he was not grieved because murthering of the man of God was against the honour of God but because not murthering of him was against his supposed credit he should appear before men perjured and to kill was a torment of conscience it was then a protestation in favour of his own credite and conscience naturall Hence the formall objects of action and action show the clear difference between the combate between sense and reason or between a naturall conscience and the flesh for a naturall conscience cannot plead for and protest in favour of the spirituall Law of God and the combate between the flesh and the Sprit 2. The second speciall difference is in the Law convictions and the Gospel convictions convictions under the Gospel are stronger and more solide for they have more of sanctified reason 2. Will. 3. Inclination of heart and affection A believer accuseth himself and joines actively with the Spirit to convince himself and hightens his own guiltinesse Psal. 51.1 2 3 4 5 6. Dan. 9.5 6 7 8 9 20. but a Law conviction comes upon Divels and they tremble John 2.19 and upon such as are under the Law and are unsent for by resultance from a naturall conscience as heat from fire light from the Sun Compelled convictions speak a Law-state 2. It is easier to be found and Orthodox then to be Godly Sathan in a manner foundly believes there is one God Jam. 2.19 and
whole and need no Physick 3. Ye loath Christ but knows it not Luke 7.44.45 ye love Christ as a supposed Prophet and loath him as a Redeemer One may deadly hate Christ and not know it 4. Ye cannot compare the two states together the state of nature and the state of Grace as 1 Tim. 1.13 ye idolize your own choise to bear down Achabs Idolatrie but choose not the will of God to oppose Ieroboams Idolatrie 5. Ye want Christ and ye were not born with Christ in the heart 2. Yea ye are eternally lost without him and know neither the one nor the other Quest. 4. Whether or not are beleevers the parties of the Covenant of Grace Ans. These are parties to whom the Covenant-promise is made not these who already have the benefit promised in the Covenant but beleevers must have a new heart and consequently faith already therefore they cannot be parties with whom the Covenant is made As because the Image of God is not promised to Adam in the Covenant of Works but presupposed to be in him by order of nature before God make with him the Covenant of Works else he could not be able to keep that Covenant which we cannot say for God created him right and holy Gen. 1.26 27. Eccles. 7.29 Eph. 4.24 Col. 3.10 Therefore Adam in his pure naturalls as not yet indued with the Image of God cannot be the partie with whom the Covenant of Works is made for then the Image of God must either be a reward which Adam by his pure naturalls and strength thereof must purchase by working which the Scripture and nature of the Covenant cannot admit or then the Image of God must be promised to Adam in the Covenant of Works which is no lesse absurd And if faith be promised in the Gospel the Covenant of Grace must be made with some Israel and Judah as predestinated to life eternall and yet wanting a new heart For God cannot Covenantâ—ways promise a new heart to such as have it but to suchÌ„ as have a stony heart and beleeve not Ezek. 36.26 Deut. 30.6 Ezek 11.19 nor can he promise faith to such as have faith this way Quest. 5. Who are these that have the new heart and so are personally and really within the Covenant of grace Ans. Because the new spirit is given when the new heart is given Ezek. 36.27 Ezek. 18.31 Make you a new heart and a new spirit and many in our times boast of the spirit it shall be fit to speak of the new spirit and who are spirituall Hence these Questions of the new spirit Quest. 1. What is the seed of the new spirit Ans. The word of the Gospel therefore before Adam could have the Gospel-spirit the Lord must reveal the Doctrine of the Gospel the seed of the woman must tread down the head of the serpent Gen. 3. So the word and the spirit are promised together Isa. 59.21 Isa. 30.21 Thy teachers shall not be removed and thine ears shall hear this is the inward teaching a voice behind thee saying this is the way walk ye in it Isa. 51.16 17. Mat. 28.20 Go teach that is the word Loe I am with you to the end of the world that is the Spirit to make it effectuall by my Spirit Joh. 14.16 17. Object But Adam when he heard first the Doctrine of the blessed seed could not try the Doctrine or speaker by any new Doctrine Ans. The first Doctrine can be tryed by no other rule because it was the first rule it self nor can these principalls written in the heart naturally That God is God is just holy c. be tryed by any other truths because they are first truths As the sense of seeing cannot try whether the Sun be the Sun by the light of some other Sun that is before this Sun which is more lightsome For there is not another Sun before this the Gospel it self hath God shining in it to these who are enlightened as Adam was a Rubbie doth speak that is a Rubbie Obj. How then should Adam know what God spake to him and nâ—t to another are we not to try all spirits that speak Ans. There is a word immediatly spoken by the Prophets and Apostles that is to be tryed partly by the first Preaching the Lord made in Paradise partly by the effects that it converteth the soul Psal. 19.7 and smells of that same Majesty and the divine power of another life which is in the first Sermon Gen. 3.15 this is Verbum Dei immediatum But when God himself speaks in his own person to Adam to Abraham Gen. 22. to Moses Isaiah the Apostles that is Verbum Dei immediatissimum the fountain-word neither word nor speaker is to be tryed The Patriarchs and Prophets are never bidden try the visions of God for when God speaks them himself he makes it evident that it is he and only he who speaks and we read not of any in this deceived Angels or men cannot counterfeit God Obj. There have after the Canon of the Scripture is closed been some men who have Prophesied facts to come that fell out as they foretold just as Isaiah Elias and other Prophets then something is to be beleeved that is not written and such may have the Spirit and yet no word of Scripture goes along with it Ans. 1. Such men may have I confesse a Propheticall spirit but first they were eminently holy and sound in the faith and taught that the Catholick Church should beleeve nothing nor practise nothing but what is warranted by the Word Such as boast of Spirit or Prophesie and reject the word are therefore not to be beleeved 2. What these men of God foretold is a particular fact concerning a man what death he should die or a Nation or a particular such a man shall be eternally saved but no dogma fidei nor any truth that lays bands on the Catholick Church to believe that to the end of the world as all Scripturall truths do and a doubt it is if we are to beleeve these in the individuall circumstances of fact sub periculo peccati upon hazard of sinning against God we may I judge without sin suspend belief and yeeld charity to the speaker 3. If any object the Prophets did foretell particular facts concerning the death of Ahab the birth of Josiah which concerned particular persons I but they so were the maters of fact as the crucifying of Christ was a mater of fact as also they did by the intent of the Holy Ghost contain Historicall Morall and dogmatically divine Instructions so that the whole Catholick Church must believe them with certainty of divine faith they being written and spoken for our Instruction and they sin who believe not Quest. 2. What are we to judge of these truths revealed to Professors when they are in much nearnesse to God and the Lord is pleased to shine upon them in some fulness of manifestation of himself to their
purpose of heart to obey either obedience or faith formally 5. If to be justified by faith in Christ as not only Jesus who saves but as Lord who commands then we are justified by love for we are to love him not as Jesus only but also as Lord 1 Cor. 16.22 Eph. 6.24 especially since all the works of the Law come under the command of love Matth. 22.3.7 Luk. 7.27 Deu. 6.5 Rom. 13.8 6. All these thy faith hath saved thee Matth. 9. Luk. 7. only beleeve must be of this truth thy good works hath saved thee only do good works And it is strange that Paul saith Eph. 2.8 By grace ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God 9. Not of works lest any man should boast Nor could Paul make an opposition between grace and works as in Rom. 11.6 if the grace of beleeving and good works were one in the New Testament for so we should be saved by works and not by works And Paul by an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 takes that away Yea but we are saved that is justified and delivered from obligation to wrath by the works of free-grace He answers nay but neither are we saved or justified by these works of grace as by means or causes For we are first saved and justified before we can do good works for good works are the fruits of free-grace since v. 10. we are his workmanship created in Christ Iesus and so justified and saved in Christ Jesus to good works that we should walk in them Yea and Paul undenyably removeth this doubt 1 Cor. 4.4 I know nothing by my self that is by his grace I am free of such sinnes as bring condemnation and so he must abound in works of grace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet thereby and notwithstanding of all my inherent holinesse by works of grace I am not justified 7. There should be no ground of gloriation and boasting more then this by the Socinian and Arminian way if we should be justified by works which come from free-will not determined by any grace either habituall or actuall which is merited by the death of Christ but do proceed from pure free-will which separateth the beleever from the non-beleever Then might we glory and boast that we are not in the debt of Christ or of his grace for that which is our formall righteousnesse before GOD and so no flesh can say they are justified by grace but that we are justified by nature the same way that Adam should have been justified without being beholden to CHRIST or to his death Asser. 3. There are not properly the same causes of the possession of Life Eternall and of the righteousnesse of Life Eternall The ransome of Christs blood is only the cause of the right For jus or right to Life Eternall is a legall and a morall thing eâ—s morale and hath a morall cause as a man hath right to such a City being the Lord and owner thereof by birth or money or conquesse or by gift or grant of a Prince or of the Citizens themselves but possession and injoying the houses and rents of the City is a Physicall thing ens Physicum and hath a Physicall cause as eating drinking lodging sleeping wearing of cloaths to defend the body from the cold So the legall right a man hath to the bread and lodging he hath in an Innes but the Physicall causes are hunger appetite bodily necessities so require and his pleasure to make use of such necessities Hence the eating drinking may be Physically good and the right jus legale very bad he may have no right to the bread when he comes to it only by spoil and rapine So the legall right jus legale to life eternall is the ransome of blood that Christ payed our Goel our friend and kinsman to make the inheritance ours but that great I may say almost Apostolick light Mr. John Calvin saith good works are as it were the inferiour causes of the possession of life So simple possession is one thing and quâ— jure aut titulo but by what Law-right he possesseth is another thing But 1. Good works are necessary necessitate praecepti by the command of God and promise 1 Thes. 4.4 1 Cor. 6.20 Eph. 2.10 Matth. 28.20 and where it is said 1 Tim. 4.8 Godlinesse is profitable to all things having the promise of the life that now is and of that which is to come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the promise is opposed to the Law And that is a strong Argument Gal. 3.18 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If the inheritance be of the Law it is no more of promise but God gave it to Abraham by promise Covenant-promise What is that to the Galatians and to us Gentiles Mâ—ch every way For three notable points are therein 1. The heavenly inheritance promised to the seed to Christ and his ver 16. not a pâ—or earthly Canaan as Sociniâ—ns and Papists say were promised to Abraham and his seed except they say that an earthly Canaan was promised to Christ. 2. That Covenant-promise of an heavenly inheritance made to Abraham the same is made to the believing Galatians the Gentiles and their seed else Paul saith nothing for the Doctrine of Justification by faith to the Gentiles contrair to the purpose of the Apostle 3. There is an inheritance by Covenant-promise a promise of eternall life made not to works as the price that buyes the right for sure then Christ must have dyed in vain 3. Works are not necessary simply necessitate medii for then we must exclude all Infants But the necessity of a Precept inferreth a necessity of means ordinary to all capable of a Command that they do good and sow to the Spirit that they may reap of the Spirit life everlasting Gal. 6.8 3. They are necessary for the glory of God Math. 5.16 1 Pet. 3.1 2. 1 Pet. 2.12 4. They are necessary by the law of gratitude which is common both to the Covenant of Works and of Grace as we are debters to God for being so to God-incarnate as ransoned ones for everlasting life 1 Cor. 6.20 Luke 1.75 1 Pet. 1.18 and eternall well-being But such as will have our works the formall cause of our justification they put them in the chair of Christs merite and they must be meritorious as Adams legall obedience should have been yea but not but by and of gracious estimation God so esteeming them say they True but as is proven neither was Adams obedience meritorious but by Gods estimation Yea and Calvine gives a power of meriting ex pacto to our works But our works of grace are dyed and washen in Christs blood and justified that they may justifie us But the Scripture speaks nothing of justifying of works or not imputing sin to our works Antinomians dream of a freeing of both the person and works of a justified man from Law-obligation and that is a way indeed to justifie works of murther
and adultery in David or any justified man from being sins against the Law of God But because our works of grace have an intrinsâ—call power of meriting and justifying communicated to them by the merits of Christ they must be far more our formall righteousnesse before God then Adams righteousnesse was his justification and life before God And if our works of grace have no power of merite or worth communicated to them from Christs death then must it follow though Christ had never dyed our works may have the same gracious esteem of God the same power of meriting of justifying and saving they now have Yea and since Christ hath redeemed us from our vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 by his blood Why but as he hath redeemed us from hell and purchased salvation to us by giving us grace by our own good works after conversion to redeem and justifie and save our selves so he hath redeemed us from our vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 by giving us grace to do such works before we be redeemed from our vain conversation and before we be converted as we may merite our conversion and Redemption from our vain conversation If it be said he absolutely and without any condition that is required on our part by his blood redeems all whom he hath given his Son Christ to die for from their vain conversation 1. All mankinde without exception for by their way he hath died for them all must be redeemed from their vain conversation and converted Nothing can be more false 2. The Gospel to no purpose and the Gospel-Commands shall in vain crave obedience or so much as the duty of hearing the Gospel from such as are not yet redeemed from their vain conversation or not yet converted For that Redemption is promised to them â—bsolutely without any condition required of them saith this way Obj. If works have a causative influence on the possession of glory as working on wages and fighting on victory then must they have influence on just possession also For possession except it be just is no possession but usurpation Answ. Possession is essentially the enjoying of any thing pleasant gainfull yea or honest whether the title be just or unjust The Title is accidentall to the Possession Obj. 2. He that possesseth the Crown possesseth the Diamonds and pretious stones and the worth of the Crown Therefore he that possesseth life possesseth the right and title to it Answ. True but hence it followeth not but possession and right to what we possesse do differ in their nature Nor do we properly possess the right of possession for the right or title is modus rei non res the maner of and the due or the undue way of the possession thereof Obj. 3. Is not possession of eternall life from Christ as well as the title or right to the Crown from Him Ans. True both are from Christ but not the same way Possession of the Crowne is the enjoying thereof and is from free grace and we as willing and sanctified agents make use thereof But Christ alone bought with his blood the title and right to it And when he gave his life for the rightfull and due possession of glory to us we did contribute nothing either request or help to procure the title and the grace to enter in to the possession by faith is the fruits also of free grace Nor can it be denyed but our good works by which we enter into possession of the Crown are also the fruit of Christs death but yet not so as there is any meritorious or federall power of deserving the possession communicate to our works Only they are made by Christs death the oblidged way to the possession of life Obj. 4. How then is there a promise of the life to come made to Godlinesse 1 Tim. 4.8 Answ. That promise is neither a promise of the Covenant of Works for by the deeds of the Law no flesh can be saved Nor is it a federall promise of the Covenant of Grace strictly so called except any would say that it is called a promise especially for faith which is speciall Godlinesse and the acknowledging of the truth which is according to godlinesse Tit. 1.1 and so a promise made to the Godly in so far as he is in Christ by faith and in Christ is the promise of life 2 Tim. 1.1 Nor 3. is the promise of a title and right which is made to Christ our Ransone payer made to our Godlinesse as if it did buy our right to life eternall or were the price thereof 4. Life is promised to Believers who work not because they work And 5. the Lord in these only showeth the order of bringing men to glory not the causes of the right and title to glory except we say the mowing of the first quarter of the Meadow is the cause of the mowing of the second because it makes way to the mowing of the second and the mowing of the second quarter is a cause of the mowing of the third and so forth untill all be mown As because God gives grace to work to run to use means therefore he giveth of free grace the crown of life in the possession thereof Obj. Adams Law-obedience should only have so and by this way been the cause or way to the possession Ans. Not so if Adam had perfected his obedience he should have claimed life by right of sinlesse federall merit ex pacto without suiting of it by any title of grace merited by CHRIST not so we It s true beleevers are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 worthy Rev. 3. but that is legally in Christ the Head not that the meritorious worth of Christ goeth out of himself and renders our works intrinsecally meritorious CHAP. XX. Whether or not suffered Christ for any sin against the Gospel only such as unbeleef finall which is conceived to be the only sin against the Gospel That Christ died not for all without exception The unwarrantablenesse of that Doctrine how the Law commands justifying faith and repentance how not IT may appear that Christ suffered not for any sin which is onely against the Gospel such as finall unbeleef If any sins be considered in any other respect as against the Gospel only then Christ was not to suffer for any such sin so considered for where no death is threatened none is explicitely due and where it is not so due to the sinner nor should have been execute upon him there it could not have been due to Christ nor executed upon him For the Gospel threateneth not death to any sin but finall unbeleef and rebellion and for that Christ never died therefore Christ died not for any sin as against the Gospel nor suffered that which is no where threatened But this is most doubtsome and cannot well stand It s true that Christ suffered not for finall unbeleef it being the proper sin of some reprobates to wit of such as hear the Gospel Joh. 8.21
For there be maâ—y Nations who never heard of Christ and understand not writing or any of the commonest Latine and Greek and there is not any such decree revealed in the word and we can not but know such gifts of Tongues are not bestowed on men and without this it is physically impossible to communicate the Gospel It shall not help to say that Christians should travell to all Countreys and learn their Tongues that so they may communicate the Gospel and it is their sin they do not so And therefore God hath decreed that the Gospel may be offered and Christ applicable Ans. 1. What shall become of the aged and of multitudes for whom Christ died who must die in Paganism before Christians can be so mixed and learn the Tongues of all Nations under Heaven 2. Did ever the Apostles to whom the Lord gave the gift of the tongues go to this Nation and not to this but by the call of the Spirit to Macedonia not to Bythinia Act. 16 Is there no call of God now required for spreading of the Gospel Some Nations would kill them some would persecute Christians to death and not receive them in the mean time many for whom Christ died perish 3. Show from Scripture that it is the duty of Christians to mix themselves with all Nations and to learn their Language and that they sin in not doing so Nor let it be said into what Nâ—tion soever I come I may say if thou beleeve in Christ thou shalt be saved Ans. 1. You can not say that except you Pâ—each the Gospel to them For they are not oblidged to believe upon one sentence and if you Preach the Gospel to the Nation God â—â—th some chosen ones there and it is no more a Pagan Nation 〈◊〉 Yoâ— are to say to any one by your way thou art oblidged â—o beleeve that Christ satisfied for all thy sins and for the sins of the whole world but that is a lie which you teach Pagans as a principle of the Gospel 3. It s false that I may say and Preach truely such a thing to every Nation and all in it 4. Nor is it physically possible that Christians can so speak to all and every old and young Also all is indeed referred to the free-will except the Authors say that God doth insuperably determine the will of the Elect to beleeve and the places speak of thâ—â—fficacious redemption of the Elect only But so God had two intentions in Christs dying one generall to render all mankind saveable another speciall actually to save the Elect. But 1. who can beleeve multiplied intentions in God of half redemption from wrath and of whole redemption from both vain conversation and â—â—ath upon their bare word when the Scripture saith Christ in suffeâ—ing without the Camp suffered for the world of Jew and Gentiles that he might sanctifie them he died for 2. What warrand to separate these two conjoined by God to wit that CHRIST should bear on the Crosse the sins of reprobate and not intend that they should die to sin and be redeemed but not from all iniquity be loved and washen and not made Kings and Priests to God That Christ should be wounded for the transgressions of many and yet the chastisement of his peace not be upon them 3. The dying for all and every one cannot be conditionall in so far as the condition is referred to dying to wit if they believe for so believing must go before dying either really which is manifestly false for multitudes for whom Christ dyed had neithâ—r being nor believing when he dyed for them Or in the prescience of God and that destroyes their principles for so Christ cannot have died for all and every one foreseeing that all and every one would believe for he never foresaw that the Reprobate should believe Then must the condition of dying or Redeeming or of paying the ransone of His blood these being all one be referred to Gods accepting of Christs death for so many or for all if they should believe And the same way the Argument is as formerly For God accepteth the payed ransome for all and every one if they all really believe or if they all and every one be foreseen of God to believe befâ—re the Lords accepting of them Both are false as is evidâ—â—t 〈…〉 they say in the issue what we say and contradict themselves to wit that believers and only believers are these for whom Christ died We before said the promises are conditionally to all within the Visible Church but so as the condition relates only to the benefite promised we shall have remission and life if we believe but not otherwise But now the Covenant-promise which is accepted of and assented unto by Professors in their very profession in themselves or their pâ—â—â—nts is absolutely made to all within the Visible Church and they are Covenant-wayes ingadged and say and professe they are the Lords people and they take him and no other for thâ—â—r God whether they obey and believe or no for a people not right in heart may bind themselves in Covenant with God Deâ—â— 29.10 11 12 13 14. compared with 21 22 23. Deut. 31.27 Jâ—sh 24.22 compared with Judg. 2.12 13. So God absolutely intends to save all for whom Christ dies and by his death intends to give a price to redeem them from hell and from unbelief or their vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 from all iniquitie Tit. 2.14 from this present evill world Gal. 1.14 Ergo from finall unbeleef the greatest iniquity of a present evill world But here the case widely varies upon no condition that we can read in holy Scripture gave Christ a price a ransome of blood to redeem men from unbeleef and from all iniquitie this price must be absolutely given and grace purchased to all whose sins Christ did â—ear in the Crosse that they may beleâ—ve that they may be sanctified Heb. 13.12 1 Pet. 2.24 2. Sinnes of Thomas refusing to beleeve the resurrection of Christ and of Peter denying the Lord before men and the Gospel-sinnes of beleevers after they are justified and are inlightened must be sins against the Covenant of Grace as well as against the Law And the denying of Christ before men hath a sad threatning of everlasting death Matth. 10.32 Mar. 8.38 annexed to it if they repent not And shall these within the Visible Church who receive not Christ be in a harder condition then Sodom and Gomorrah Matth. 10.14 15. if no sins against the Gospel be punished with eternall death but only unbelief Yea the Scripture saith such as live in the Visible Church and are in Covenant with God not only for finall unbelief are condemned but because they are unrighteous fornicators idolaters adulterers 1 Cor. 6.9 whoremongers unclean covetous persons Eph. 5.5 6. murtherers sorcerers dogs liers Rev. 21.8 Rev. 22.15 for all their ungodly deeds and hard spâ—eches Jude v. 15. 2 Pet. 2.17 for all disobedience 1 Cor.
Commandement of love Q. 2. Doth the Lord Mediator in the Covenant of Grace command the same good works to all thâ— same way Ans. Rom. 3.19 The Lord in the Law must speak one way to these that are under the Law that is under the jurisdiction and condemning power of the Law and a far other way to these that are not under the Law CHRIST speaks to reprobats in the Visible Church even when the matter of the command is Evangelick as to non-confederates of grace in a Law way and in a Law intention For he cannot bid them obey upon any other ground then legislative authority not upon the ground of Redemption-love bestowed on them or that he died out of love to save all and every one For we disclaim that ground or because he died out of a speciall design to save them as his chosen ones For there is no ground for that untill we beleeve But they are to obey upon the ground of Redemption-love so they first beleeve and fiducially rely upon Christ the Saviour of all But he commands Law-obedience to his chosen even as Mediator 1. Upon a Gospel intention to chase them to Christ Gal. 3.23 2. When they are come to bâ—dge them in with Law-threatning to adhere in a Godly fear more closely to Christ. But the Lord commands no beleever to believe hell in the event to be their reward but to beleeve perseverance and life but hell in the deserving Hence that 1 Tim. 1.9 The Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not made for the righteous to condemn them as if God thereby opened up to them their doom but for the lawlesse c. to let them be damned and see their damnation CHAP. XXII The differences in the promise of the Covenants Quest. WHat is the speciall difference of the promise of the two Covenants Ans. It is known that only life eternall is promised in the Law if a right to the things of this life was promised to Adam it is like he behoved to compleat his course of obedience and merit a right legall to the herbs and fruit of the earth beside the right he had by gift of Creation ex dono Creatoris non jure operum But 2. There was no promise made to Adam of perseverance and so no promise made to him of influences to work in Adam to will and to do so the influences by which he obeyed was purum donum Creatoris a meer gift of the Creator not a gift of either the grace of Christ or a promised grace though in a large sense it may be called a grace or donum gratis datum For God gave that influence upon no obligation Now that it was not a grace promised is evident by Adams fall for God who is true fulfills his promises 2. Augustine and our Divines teach Dedit Deus posse ut vellet non velle ut posset a power to stand but not the gift of actuall perseverance If any say that the Lord promised to Adam perseverance conditionally which in one sense is true in another false if he pleased in that he gave to him all necessaries required for actuall standing Ans. 1. This is to teach that perseverance was promised the same way in the Covenant of Works that Arminius saith it is promised in the Covenant of Grace and that the free-will was absolute lord of standing and falling and to deny God to be the nearest cause of our standing and persevering in either the one or the other and to bid us first and last sacrifice to our own free-will 2. Willing perseverance actuall cannot be promised conditionally for the question should be Upon what condition doth the Lord promise to work in Adam actual perseverance if he should be willing to persevere But the question shall remain whether that willingnesse to persevere since it is the greatest part if not whole perseverance be promised or not If it be not promised the contrair whereof they hold if it be promised conditionally the question shall recur what shall be the condition and another condition then the willingnesse of the will to persevere cannot be given and so the argument shall rise against it self and the issue must be God gave to Adam actuall perseverance if he should be willing to persevere that is he gives to Adam perseverance if he give him perseverance for willingnesse to persevere is perseverance or a very large part thereof 3. But persevering grace and so influence of grace to persevere is promised in the Covenant of Grace Jer. 31.35 that they shall continue in Covenant more sure then the night and the day Jer. 32.40 I will put my fear in their hearts that they shall not depart from me The meaning cannot be I will give them a power never to depart from me if they will For so nothing is more promised in Christ to the second Adams heirs then to Adam and the Angels that fell for the like say they was promised to them And 2. If notwithstanding of that fear both promised and put in the heart and in the will yet lubrick free-will may stand or fall and remain indifferent to either then the sense shall be thus I will make an everlasting Covenant I will put my fear in their heart by which they may either depart from me and turn apostates or not depart from me but persevere But so the Covenant made with Adam and the fallen Angels should be an everlasting Covenant and yet it was broken For the Image of God of it self inclined Adam and the fallen Angels never to depart from God For sure Adams fear being a part of that Image which sanctified his affections inclined him but not undeclinably and immutably not to depart from God and not to hearken to the lying Serpents suggestions But it is not that new Covenant-fear promised and given in the second ADAM Ier. 32.39 40. 4. That these influences were purchased by Christs death is clear because they are the nearest causes of our actuall believing and coming to Christ of faith and perseverance that are given freely and repentance and faith are given of Christ Acts. 5.31 Zech. 12.10 2 Tim. 2.25 Phil. 1.29 Ephes. 2.1 2 3. Ezek. 36.26 27. Eph. 1.17 18 19 20. John 6.44 45. 5. So obedience to the Covenant of Works was Adams own 2. And came from his concreated self the Image of God that was his own by a common influence and neither was the Image of God nor the influences of God acts of free grace or the purchase of grace properly so called 2. Adam had a Law-claim to the Crown without sin if he had continued in obedience and did merite ex pacto life eternall our new Covenant obedience in habituall and actuall performance is so a duty that it is also promised and a benefite merited to us by the death of Christ whereas Adams obedience was purum officium non officium promissum as our Gospel-obedience is 6. Hence in obedience distinguish two
promises to the Reprobate though in teaâ—ms Evangelick yet are Law to them if Cain do well he shall be saved if Judas beleeve he shall be saved because God by Grace fulfills not the promise in them Obj. 1. Then shall Gospel-obedience be of lesse worth then Law-obedience which floweth not from Grace which Christ hath merited by his death Ans. It s not denyed but it is obedience so the Scripture Heb. 5.9 Rom. 1.5 Rom. 6.17 Rom. 16.19 2 Cor. 10.5 1 Pet. 1 5. Act. 6.9 Act. 5.32 37. But 2. It hath lesse of the nature of obedience but more excellency Who would say Peter labouring in the Vineyard of John for wages does properly obey if we suppon that Peter hath from John not only soul will body arms and legs but the inward infused principle of willingnesse the habite and art of dressing Vines the nearest propension and determination of will to work so have we in the Gospel but in the Law though the Lord who gives being does also give his Image to Adam and his influence to obey yet the Image of God is concreated and Adams own grace especially merited by Christ is supervenient and a meer stranger to us and the influence though it did predetermine Adams will yet it is connaturall as it were naturae debita not merited by Christs death and so we give more of our own when we give the fruit of Creation which God hath bestowed on the Pismire and the Worm then when we give the obedience of Grace 2. The obedience of Adam though rationall and perswasive there being a lamp of light in the mind yet came from the feared authority of the Law-giver under the pain of damnation the Gospel-obedience is by the word Act. 2.37 is by way of perswasion Christ saith not Peter thou art afraid of hell feed my Lambs but Peter loves thou me feed my Lambs For a Law-obeyer is not to beleeve life eternall but in so far as he shall keep the Law perfectly the Gospel obeyer so obeyes as he beleeves deliverance from wrath and life eternall but his beleeving is not reckoned to him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Law-debt but of love and Grace-debt See Rom. 4.4 Matth. 6.12 these promises 1 Tim. 4.8 Luk. 12.31 Matth. 19.29 are exponed by the promises made to the overcomer Rev. 2. Rev. 3. which is by faith 1 Joh. 5.4 5. 3. But it is most true Gospel-obedience hath these excellencies 1. It is a plant of a more noble Vine coming from the merit of blood yet is not our obedience comparable to Christs for a work of Law or Gospel Grace hath a necessary reference to no wages of its own nature but only by the interveening of the free pleasure of God But Christs obedience intrinsecally from the excellent dignity of the person hath a meriting vertue 2. It works more eminently then nature It is a pillar to support sowning nature and acts in more excellent subjects in CHRIST in the Elect Angels in the Redeemed ones and makes them stones of another nature and this is the handie-work of CHRIST Isai. 54.11 I will lay thy stones with fair colours and lay thy foundations with Saphires v. 12. I will make thy windows of Agats and thy gates of Carbuncles and all thy borders of pleasant stones What do morall men that work on clay and make clay pots all their life and know nothing of the actings of saving Grace Fairest civility is but roustie iron the basest of Mettals and they sweat and hammer upon Law-works being strangers to Christ and his gold O! what a difference between praying and hearing out of discretion and by necessity of the office and praying in the Holy Ghost and hearing in faith CHAP. XXIII Q. VVHat sort of doing the Law requireth The Scripture is clear that consumate and continued in doing to the end is required by the Law Paul interpreting Moses Deut. 26.27 Gal. 3.10 Cursed be every one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who continueth not in all that are written in the Law to do them Deut. 26.27 Cursed is he who shall not confirm It is a word they use in inacting of Laws when we say Be it statuted and ordained the word in Piel is three times in the Book of Esther to ordain by a Law Which clearly saith that the Covenant of Works was a work of justice and such a time God set to Adam so as to the end he was to run it out but how long he was a viator or traveller in his course of obedience no man knows CHAP. XXIII Whether faith as lively and true or faith as continuing to the end be the condition of the Covenant of Grace THese who in all points as in this make this new Covenant a Covenant of Works contend that faith as enduring to the end must be the condition of the new Covenant 1. Because the promise of the reward 2. The reward is given to him that endures to the end And this faith say they is the adequat and compleat-condition of the Covenant of Grace as full and consumate obedience to the end in degrees and parts 2. But faith as lively and sincere is the condition of the Covenant the nature and essence of this faith is to continue to the end but continuance to the end is an accident all condition of this onely essentiall condition of the Covenant faith quae which endures to the end but not quâ aut quatenus as it endures to the end is that which saves us and justifies us as the condition of the Covenant 1. Faith as lively units us to Christ and justifies whether it be come to the full perfection or not Otherwise 1. no man should be ingrafted in Christ as brâ—nches in the Vine Tree no man partakers of the Divine nature no man quickened but he that dies in finall beleeving Whereâ—s Joh. 5.24 he that beleeveth before his finall continuâ—nce to the end 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath passed from death to life and shall never come to condemnation And in this is the difference of the condition of the Covenant of Works that Adam had no right to life by one or two the most sincere acts and highest in measure except he continue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Law saith Deut. 26.27 Gal. 3.10 to the end otherwise at the first act of obedience perfect in degrees and parts God behoved by Covenant except the Lord should break the first Covenant himself before man sin which is blasphemous to have given him confirming grace and the reward of life but the condition of the Covenant of Grace is that He that beleeves Joh. 3.36 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not condemned yea is freed from all condemnation Rom. 8.1 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath life being really unâ—ted as the member to the head as the branch to the tree mystically as the wife to the husband legally as the debter and the surety becomes one person in Law the summe one
satisfactory passions For satisfaction is defined a voluntary restoring of the equivalent and as good in the place of what is taken away and the good restored must be 1. Undue 2. The proper good of the restorer which agrees to the active and passive obedience of Christ. Obj. Then Christs very weeping and praying being the weeping and praying of God-Man might have been a perfect satisfaction for our sins for Christ was God-Man in all his holy actions in the state of humiliation as in his being crucified and in his suffering Ans. This doth not follow Because the punishment of the breach of the Law and not that only but such a speciall punishment by dying the first and second death according to the threatening of the Law Gen. 2.17 In the day that thou eatest thou shalt surely die was required in the Law and except the threatening of the Law be fulfilled the Law is not fulfilled And Paul Gal. 3.13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law being made a curse for us for it is written cursed be every oâ—e that hangeth on a tree Now Christs suffering the death of the crosse the cursed death is that which makes him under the Law Ergo there is a Law-righteousnesse in suffering death So Gal. 4.4 God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law For what end 5. To redeem them that were under the Law that we might receive the Adoption of sons How are we redeemed from under the Law By blood purchasing to us Justification Rom. 3.24 Being justified freely by his Grace through the redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousnesse for the remission of sins past And redemption from the curse of the Law and remission is ever ascribed to the blood of Christ dying Rom. 3.24 25. Ye are bought with a price 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called a ransome of Christs blood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Matth. 20.28 1 Tim. 2.6 Eph. 1.1.7 In whom we have redemption in his blood the forgivenesse of sins Col. 1.14 In whom we have redemption through his blood even the forgivenesse of sins Rom. 5.9 Being justified by his blood 1 Pet. 1.18 Being redeemed by the blood of the Lamb unspotted and undefided 1 â—oh 1.8 The blood of Jesus Christ purgeth us from all sin Rev. 5.9 And they sang a new song to wit the four Beasts and the four and twenty Elders for thou wast slain and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood 1 Pet. 1.18 By his stripes which he suffered in his death Isa. 5.3 we are healed Rev. 1.5 To him that hath loved us and washen us from our sins in his blood For though all Christs actions of God-man from the worth of the infinite person be meritorious yet are they refuseable yea a satisfaction by Covenant which was the death of God-Man must be also 2. The word also never speaks of Christs dying for all but it mentions Justification in his blood Ro. 3.24 25. Rom. 5.9 Yea the Scripture adds another end of Christs death to wit forgivenesse Col. 1.14 Eph. 1.7 intercession at the right hand of GOD 1 Joh. 2.1 that we may receive the Adoption of sons Gal. 4.5 To make us Kings and Priests to God Rev. 1.16 dying to sin living to him 1 Pet. 2.24 That he might bring us to God 1 Pet. 3.18 The glorifying of God in our bodies 1 Cor. 6.19 20. Redeeming us from our vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 From this present evill world Gal. 1.4 Sanctifying the people Heb. 13.12 Heb. 10.8 9 10. All which the Lord must intend in Christs death to Pagans old and young to all and every one of mankind to whom the Gospel could not come And what authority have men to devise a redemption generall universall from hell and not from sin 2. For life eternall and not for the giving of the Spirit and for redemption from a vain conversation and for sanctifying of the people also 3. A redemption in Christs blood but no forgivenesse of sins in his blood not any non-imputation of sin nor reconciliation of the world 2 Cor. 5.15 18 4. A dying of the just for the unjust but not to bring them to God a redeeming of them but not a redeeming of them out of every Kindred and Tongue and People and Nation for these People Nations and Tongues were redeemed by this way as well as they and a washing of them in his blood but no making of them Kings and Priests to God a dying for all but no living to him contrair to 1 Pet. 1.18 Rev. 5.9 Rev. 1.5.5 6. 2 Cor. 5.15 5. Christs blood did something and it is not any thing to make all saveable to pacifie Justice satisfie the Law to merite Heaven but did nothing to soften the heart mortifie and sanctifie the will mind affections to remove unbeleef to renew the mind But it is sure the Lord had not intended to commit heaven and hell any more to a sanctified will but mutable and lubrick in Adam but to commit all to Christ to a better Covenant better promises to a way of free-grace not of nature Yet these men commit the salvation and damnation of all and every one to an unsanctified corrupt rebellious will Gen. 6.5 Gen. 8.21 1 Cor. 2.14 Joh. 6.44 Job 14 4. Psal. 51.5 Jer. 17.9 10 c. except they say Pagans and all mankind are regenerated sanctified justified yea to a worse Covenant then that Covenant of Works to an universall Covenant of Grace That 1. never came to their ears 2. By which they are in a worse condition then Adam was who had the Image of God in his soul and a full power to stand and a clearly revealed Covenant But all mankind for whom Christ is supposed to die are born heirs of wrath but they are born in more miserie in the bondage of sin of a blind heart of a corrupt will their chains heavier their furnace hoter in hell helps fewer And yet the absolutenesse of Soveraignty under the freedom of the Grace of Christ by this way of Vniversalists shines no more now nay not so much now as in Adams state for more is laid upon free-will and lesse help to heal the will then was in the Covenant of Works And if all die in Adam and the Second Adam die for all he must die to loose the works of Satan in all Now if a weaker course be taken to destroy Sathans kingdom now then in Adams state and all be laid upon a weaker will Sathan is stronger now then before And if Christ do not purchase by his death grace to bow indeclinably the will of all these for whom he dyed to cause them live to him die to sin to make them Kings and Priests to God c. but leave their will in a more weak and wicked condition then it was under in the first Covenant Sathan is in this stronger
In the Covenant of Works as a sufferer for the breach of it It s said by Learned Davenantius one is said truely and properly to die for another who dies to procure his good though the other by his own fault get no good of his dying for him But there is not such a Question as this whether one may truely and properly die for another but whether Christ in the sense of the Holy Ghost died verè propriè truely and properly the just for the unjust to procure good to the unjust and yet these unjust may eternally perish and reap no good by Christs dying through their unbeleef 2. Will it not follow that Christ 1. died truely and properly for all and yet non obstante morte Christi notwithstanding of the Lords dying all the world may eternally perish as say Arminians and Socinians 3. It shall follow that the immediate yet the compleat effect of Christs death is not actuall but possible saving of all And Christ hath verè propriè truelie and properly died for them Nor 4. is it enough to say that Christ had a speciall intention in dying for the Elect to give them faith but he had no such intention in dying for the Reprobate But hence it follows that Christ as properly and truely died for the Reprobate as for the Elect as touching the nature and intention of his dying and that he offered as sufficient a ransome for the one as for the other and that is a meer possible ransome but as concerning the intention to apply effectually or no effectuall intention to apply the death there 's the difference But 1. we aske for Scripture where it is said CHRIST dying as dying for the world had these two contrair intentions The Scripture saith Christ died to gather his scattered children Joh. 11.5 to bring to God 1 Pet. 3.18 these for whom he died that they might have life Joh. 10.11 live to God 2 Cor. 5.15 die to sin 1 Pet. 2.24 be redeemed from their vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 be delivered from this present evill world Gal. 1.4 Here is our effectuall intention where is there a place for his dying with no effectuall intention to bring any to God and yet he dyed for all good and evill to make salvation possible say they It is not enough to coyn two intentions in Christ-God-Man dying and give us Scripture for one of them only and bid us take the other on trust 2. Nor is it enough to say all these places speak of Christs effectuall dying for his Elect only For 1. it is not truely nor properly said that Christ effectually died for the Elect only for he effectually died for no man by this way because he died only to make salvation possible to all so as they might perish for ever notwithstanding of his dying for them So the efficacy of dying is in Christs intention and application Now efficacy of intention and efficacy of application are both extrinsecall to his laying down his life 2. The place 2 Cor. 5.15 cannot be expounded by them of only the effect For it speaks as they expone it of Christ dying for all that were dead as v. 14. and these they say are Elect and Reprobate 3. Nothing is said whether Christ on the Crosse did sustain the person of all for whom he died Elect and Reprobate and whether he sustained two persons for he was cut off but not for himself Dan. 9.26 one for the Reprobate another for the Elect And whether he finished the transgression and made an end of sins as Daniel saith 9.24 that is of all sins and transgressions finall unbeleef and all others For except he did that hee cannot finish the transgression make an end of sins make reconciliation for iniquity and bring in everlasting righteousnesse to these for whom he died Except either he bring in half a righteousnesse or at least imperfect and never make an end of some sins and transgressions because men will not have it so and set bounds to the infinit sufficiency of Christ Oâ— because he puts an end of sin and brings in everlasting righteousnesse conditionally and is gracious and mercifull as men will and decrees to show mercy not upon discriminating rebellion or upon unbeleef which separateth a Reprobate from an Elect if so it seems good to men and if man shall have mercy on whom he will and harden whom he will or which is all one if man shall have mercy upon himself because he will or harden himself because he will harden himself Yet may it be disputable to some whethâ—r grace by which one is effectually drawn to Christ rather then another be the grace of predestination continuated and so before Christs death or a fruit of Christs death and so after But it may well be sâ—id that every created saving grace is a fruit of Christs death and that we receive the habit of saving grace out of his fulnesse and the saving habit infused separateth an Elect from a Reprobate For it is peculiar to Beleevers and the Elect to be gifted with one heart Ezek. 11.19 and a new heart in the habit Ezek. 36.26 and with the spirit 〈◊〉 grace and supplication to beleeve and mourn Zech. 12.10 and the Spirit and blessing that is powred on the thirsty ground and the seed Isai. 44.3 And so must we say that the same habit as actuated by the Lords Spirit and as it makes one to beleeve and draws him effectually to the Son actually and efficaciously and draws not another is a fruit of Christs death but this way must glory be a fruit of the death of Christ but not habituall saving grace 2. The death of Christ for all is as common a means of salvation as the Preaching of the Gospel And both must be made effectuall by efficacious grace which is not the fruit of the merit of Christ by this way and since grace to actually apply the death of Christ is not given to Pagans and millions for whom Christ died as these Authors teach how unsufficient must the death of our Lord be For it leaves faith as impossible to the reprobates as if he had never died for them for neither habituall nor actuall faith is purchased to them by this death Only the Pelagian application is left to them which they should have had suppose Christ had never died for them 2. It is to be considered how many wayes CHRIST may be said to give himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a ransome for us or in our place 1. Christ hath sufficiently died for all in their room to redeem them For pro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for men noteth ever the decree and intention of Christ dying for men but the sufficiency and worth and intrinsecal dignity of Christs death depends not upon the decree intention of God for the worth of the death and the blood of him who is God Act. 20.28 1 Cor. 2.8 and the Lord of Glory
or to hearken to conscience which craves in the name of mistaken Law well payed debts and this is but Sathan abusing the Law and feigning Letters of Caption in the name of the Law to trouble the quieted conscience of a beleever But its safest to say I stand to what Christ hath done and suffered to fulfill the Law and I believe I was crucified in him judged and condemned legally in Christ and what can you seek more of an ill-doer He is condemned crucified hanged on a tree and so is justice quieted Some raise the devill and a storm in the soul and cannot calm it again It is not good to provoke irritate and waken a sleeping dogge There is quietnesse and peace of beleeving what Christ hath done as well done and comfortably to rest on his deed by faith Hence a case of some who because they are under deadnesse and security desire a wakening of conscience and Sathan hath taught some to commit some hainous guiltinesse that they may fall in the hand of justice and so be wakened and Sathan gives them their fill of it Hence we had rather take a Law-way which is not Gods way as ly under deadnesse there may be a legall looking upon deadnesse whereas it is a Gospel-sin that we should be humbled for and in which we should not please our selves but no man freed from the Law and brought out of prison should be willing or desirous to return to the dungeon again We should let God guide us under a feaver and not be our own Physitians but be quiet at Christs part if he be pleased to cure by contrairs and to quicken me by deadening me or to make a soul humble by smiting with a spirit of pride its good we are to submit Obj. How could we be in Christ as in our surety for saith Arminius we did not give nor appoint Christ to be our Cautioner or Surety Ans. It s evill arguing of Arminius or Sathan who would make the union either naturall or legall betwixt us and Christ weak far off generall and such as is betwixt Christ and Pagans and all the world But this reason is nought for we sinners were not born and very nothing when God made the first Adam our father and head in Law as in nature nor had we any hand or action in substituting the first Adam in his place and yet we sinned in Adam and his sin is ours by divine imputation But can any deny but Christ on the Crosse did act the cause of many beleevers not born This is peculiar to this dispensation that the creditor not the debter appoint both the Law-head and the Evangelick Surety The Surety had from us a Cautionary sponsorie and deputed nature but no subscribed commission from us it was in the heart of the Creditor by grace efficacious to obtain our consent and to make a sort of legall marriage assuming our nature before we either knew our husband or gave consent to the marriage-Covenant As the Advocat speaks in the person of the Client absent and sleeping and when the Client hears and sees how his cause is promoved he both assents unto and renders thanks and praises to the Advocat and so the absent and far off Client not knowing any thing does act in the Advocat And how many answers doth our Advocat in Heaven make for sinners on earth in his pleadings of which we know not in particular any thing Nor doth Christ speak or plead for beleevers as a privat man nor appear in his Name as it were but in our person Neither is there a faining of a person here or a borrowed and fained redemption there be these five here 1. A Redeemer Christ. 2. Persons redeemed sinners 3. A Lord from whom we are redeemed the Lord Jehovah not simply as God he is the partie from whom we are redeemed but God as the offended Law-giver who had us lyable to eternall punishment 4. There was a price the life and blood of God which though not profitable to God for that is extrinsecall to satisfaction reall yet an aboundant compensation to justice for declarative glory taken from God which is the nature of reall satisfaction 5. There is here a God just true holy unchangeable to whom the price is payed Nor does Christ sustain the person of the enemy Satan from whom we are redeemed for he is but the lictor who then had no right to detain us we are redeemed from evils of sin and punishment Nor doth Christ in suffering sustain the person of God Hence from our being crucified with Christ crucified something is to be said in a practicall way of our mortification for mortification flows originally from Christs death we being crucified in him and with him Gal. 2.20 Q. What is mortification A. It is a deadning of the whole powers and inclinations of the soul in their bentnesse and operations in order to things forbidden by the Law of God or in things indifferent and commanded Hence not the affections only but the understanding and mind must be deadned And therefore this is no mortification untill sin originall be subdued in its damnation by Christs death and in its dominion by the Spirit of Sanctification A tree is not withered while standing on its root bulk and branches are green and flourishing It s much to know the withdrawing of sap and life from the root and the vitall parts of old Adam The ebbing of a River is not the drying up of it the new birth only is mortification Q. 2. Since mortification comes only from Christs death what is the influence of Christs death herein Ans. The influence is reall ad modum causae physicae the merit of blood hath bought us from our vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 Christ dying doth merit by blood the Spirit and infused grace which deadens the whole life of sin Evangelick Arguments from ten heavens from ten Gospels working morally and in a swasory way cannot more work mortification then touching can make a reall change on a dead corps we was legally dead and crucified in Christ and with Christ when he died many not being born then But in the infusing of the life of God Christ applyes the reall principle of mortification Now the redemption from a vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 from the present evil world Gal. 1.4 is as reall and proper a bargain except we follow Socinus as redemption from the wrath to come 2. Christs death hath an influence morall and swasorie to work mortification As 1 Pet. 1.16 Be holy 17. Passe the time of your sojourning in fear For ye are bought with his blood from your vain conversation And 1 Pet. 5.1 2. Christ hath suffered in the flesh therefore be mortified to your lusts and serve them not as the Gentiles do So Col. 3.1.5 But the action morall of the Gospel doth not work upon the naturall man for like works upon the like carnall reason upon a carnall spirit and
head by the ascent of Mount Olivet it is good he also praises and sings Psalms 2 Sam. 15.30 Ps. 3.1 2 3. If he be at home in his house it is good he praises Ps. 30. Ps. 101. If he be banished in the wildernesse and chased from the house of God its good he praises Psal. 42. Psal. 63. Psal. 84. Nothing falls wrong to a mortified soul. The people cry Hosanna Christ bids them rejoice their King comes Zech. 9.9 The wicked spits on his face and plucks off the hair that is good Isa. 50.6 I gave them face and back to be doing their will Heat to a gracious spirit is good cold is good joy is good sorrow is good health is good sicknesse is good Ezekiah gets a victory the Assyrians are slain that is good Isaiah prophecies that all that are in his house and his treasures shall be spoiled and his children carried captive good is the word of the Lord Is spoil and captivity and the sword good Yea Ezekiah closes with it Isai. 39.8 Grace wonders at nothing laughs at nothing weeps at nothing but faintly rejoices at nothing wantonly closes with all sayes Amen to all for Christ was crucified for me and I am crucified in and with him Q. 3. What are the speces or sorts of mortifications that we may know the true mortification A. 1. It s hard to give the division of them logically There is 1. a naturall mortification there is no fire in the affections of sucking infants to Crowns Kingdomes to treasures of Gold and Silver that is not mortification but virtually there is as much fire in a flint stone though formally it be cold as may burn twenty Cities Concupiscence driven away from the aged Eccles. 12. the hearth-stone is cold and there is in it such a deadnesse to lusts not because of deadnesse of sin Originall it lives as the souls of the old men live but because the tools are broken the animal and vitall spirits are weakened the man loves the journey but the horse is crooked and laid by there is nothing of Christs death here 2. There is a compelled mortification sicknesse and withered arms and legs and strong fetters in the prison poverty and want care for bread and the armed man poverty that hath a sharp sword necessity blunts the affections in their second acts the man hath no mind of whooring And many drink water who through Christ crucifying are not mortified to wine and strong drink 1. There is often in this an ignorance of CHRIST crucified and no faith 2. A reluctance to divine dispensation and no gracious submission to God which is in one crucified to the world 3. There is a Philosophick mortification to the creatures which are seen by the light of nature to be very nothing and most unsatisfactory to the naturall man but there is no supernaturall deadness in the heart wrought by the death of Christ. Archimedis and other great spirits sick of love to know the nature motion and influence of the starres and pained with a speculative disease of books and to know much do contemn and despise honour gain pleasure the three idols of ambitious of covetous and voluptuous men but there is no deadnesse no bluntning of the operations of the soul toward the idol world flowing from the beleeved in crucified Lord of Glory except you say that Plato and Aristotle and such were crucified with Christ Learning works not mortification 4. There is a religious or a madly superstitious mortification The Monks saith Luther dreamed that the world was crucified unto them and they unto the world when they entered unto their Monasteries but by this means Christ is crucified not the world Yea the world is delivered from crucifying and is the more quickened by that opinion of trust they had in their own holinesse and righteousnesse Col. 2.23 In will-worship in humility and neglecting of the body not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh There is much vain and counterfeit mortification and Papists have as good warrand to sacrifice their lives to God and to offer a bloodie sacrifice unto God under the New Testament as to shed their own blood in whipping and scourging and such bloody worship hath the ground of mortification that Baals Priests had to launce themselves with knives to the effusion of blood And the same may be said of pilgrimages of voluntary poverty in which as Luther said the world and all their lusts are quickened 5. Not unlike to this is the Pharisees mortification in which they are not crucified with CHRIST but alive and vigorously strong to self-righteousnesse to merits to dead works 6. There is a civill or morall mortification which hath diverse branches As 1. Senecâ— teacheth that nature is satisfied with water for drink and a â—urse for a house yet he was a covetous man himself And shall Horatius Cocles be a mortified man because he defended the Romans against the three Curiatii alone Though the bloody Gallant killed his own sister And was the state mortified who pardoned him that bloody fact for his gallant service And Decius father and son who suffered so much for their Countrey and loved it more then their own blood And must Africanus Major and Cato who suffered for the liberty of the publick and Diogenes who lived on herbs be mortified men to the world But what avails it to be dead to the bulk of a bit body of clay and yet be alive to vain glory 2. There is an occasionall deadnesse rising from the sight of a father a brother a friend dead not from the death of Christ. An unbeleever dies with this word I would not live for all the world and we are like water spilt on the ground The house is burnt all spoiled treasures and the stock by land and sea-robbers are plucked away and riches have wings Hence mortification transient for a time but lusts fallen in a sown are not dead they rise again and live 3. There is another transient mortification as D. Preston observes when the conscience is affrighted with Judgement and some fire-flaught of restraining grace is up 4. A good calm nature naturally either dul and stupid or some clement and meek disposition and free of the fire that often follows the complexion and hampered in with teachers parents company education learning seems a mortified nature But that is true mortification that flowes from faith in a humbled crucified Saviour and it is not to beleeve that Christ was mortified in our room and place as Saltmarsh and Antinomians would say Faith in Christ crucified is our mortification causatively in radice not formally Q. 4. To what things must we be crucified Answ. Gal. 6.14 To all things created to the world wee condemn and despise and hate the world and the world does value us nothing 1. There is a deadnesse to self which was in Christ our samplar of mortification Ro. 15.1 Let us not please
our selves but bear the infirmities of others 3. For even Christ pleased not himself Self loved and adored and mortification do not consist too much life in apprehension and admiring self argues deadnesse of deadnesse and of mortification Was not Christ a noble self Yet for the Lord and his ransoned ones Christ got above noble excellent self It is true there is a renewed spirituall self a new I in the Saints 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 7.17 Now it is no more I that do it but sin that dwels in me Gal. 2.20 It is not I that lives but Christ lives in me Mortification sets us above new 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 renewed self and regenerated and crucified I it being a created excellency that we are not to adore 2. Mortification requires a deadnes to the will as in Christ not my will but thy will be done Much life in the will to created things speaks little or no mortification Christ excelled in this Joh. 5.30 I seek not mine own will but the will of him that sent me O what court and power and life hath our will And how soon the will is broken and dead then is the man broken dead and crucified with Christ. Much will much life of sin See Joh. 5.40 Ye will not come Luk. 19.14 We will not have this man to raign over us See Mark 6.25 Mat. 1.19 Mark 15.15 Act. 24.27 Act. 25.9 Luk. 10.29 Rev. 22.17 All will argues no mortification 3. There is required deadnesse to our life which was eminently in Christ Mat. 20.28 1 Tim. 2.6 Joh. 10.11 So Paul Act. 20.24 Ye speak of bonds and affliction But none of thase things move me neither count I my life dear to my self so that I may finish my course with joy To be mortified to life is to hate the life Luk. 14.26 for Christ. And Revel 12. they overcame mortification was their victory v. 11. They overcame for they loved not their lives unto death Love of life is the life of sin when it s not loved in God 4. We must be dead to wisedome and to all the gifts of the mind for the wisedome of the world is foolrie and God hath befooled it when it comes in competition with the wisedom of the Gospel 1 Cor. 1.18 19. except we be dead to it we cannot glory in the Lord. 27 28 29. Compared with v. 31. 2. There must be a deadnesse to learning to books and book-vanity Eccles. 12.12 There is no end of making many books and much study is a wearinesse of the flesh Eccles. 1.17 And I gave my heart to know wisedome and to know madnesse and folly I perceived that this also is a vexation of spirit 18. For in much wisedom is much grief and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow Paul spake more with Tongues then they all 1 Cor. 14.18 but he was dead to that gift he had rather have brought them nearer to Christ. 1 Cor. 4.10 We are fools and hardly we can away with that but we are fools for Christs sake and for the interest of Christ and the Gospel let us so be counted It s nearnesse to Christ that maks us for him to be willing that what is most eminent in us be trampled upon even shining wisedome sciences acts eloquence knowledge which puffeth up Yea there is 3. required a deadnesse of the knowledge of Gospel-mysteries 1 Cor. 13.2 Paul was not rude in knowledge but he was dead to that and would not glory in that And 4. they are not crucified with Christ not dead to opinions and sides and to lead factions I am of Paul I am of Apollo was no honour to Paul in his own esteem 1 Cor. 1. What was Paul crucified for you or were ye baptized in the name of Paul Who excells in learning who admires not his own the birth of his own mind If it were but to hold there be ten new worlds in the Moon and millions of worlds in the other side of this world My brethren be not many masters Ah! we are not dead to the Chair the Pulpit every one loves to be counted and called Rabbi The blessed Man Christ confesses that he knows neither the day nor the hour of the Son of Mans coming yet there are who darre define the time of his coming and the day The mind is a proud and haughty thing and we are not dead to it the mind is not mortified to the mind 1 Cor. 8.1 2. 5. We are not dead to Mammon O who is like Christ and refuses to be a rich King Joh. 6 Paul 2 Cor. 8 9. For ye knâ—w the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ that though he was rich yet for your sake he became poor He had a greater mind then that he could live to riches Paul Acts 20.33 saith not I have sought neither silver nor gold as the Godly judge Whose ox have I taken 1 Sam. 12.3 but I have coveted no mans silver or gold or apparrel The life of lust to riches is in the trusting in it Job 31.24 If I have made gold my hope or have said to the fine gold thou art my confidence Or 25. have rejoiced because my wealth was great It s true a beggar and an extream poor man that cannot have bread is not troubled nor much tempted to seek a Kingdom and the millions and tunnes of gold that many rich ones have but yet there are speculative desires and rolling waves and floods of wishes in the heart for these and because hunger and want of bread is his door enemy lying between him and the hope of great riches the man is neither mortified to the love of bread nor to the millions of gold that the heart is sick after And as there be diverse kinds and speces of pests and they are not all of one kind yet all contrair to the blood and the heat of life So are there sundry kinds of unmortified lusts about riches according to the sicknesse of the desire Obj. But is not the desire of food and raiment naturall how then is it faulty Ans. The desire simply is naturall and the Ants and the Conies do desire But the desire 1. beyond measure 2. With a sinfull doubting that they shall not have it which reproacheth Omnipotency 3. A desire wider then that of Ants and Conies of that which is more nor sufficient which would destroy and not feed but over-feed is the faulty desire as sicknesse desires drink more then sufficient not for health but to feed the disease it is the desire of the disease rather then of the man diseased and the forbidden desire is the sin Obj. 2. May not a child of God desire more then enough how then is he mortified Ans. If the desire of more then enough come from the habit of covetousnesse the man is not mortified to Mammon all sinfull habits in the child of God are broken and lessened and chased in to inclinations or to the habit
salvation upon their own Socinian faith that is their indifferent relying upon the Saviour Jesus and their own holiness watchfulnesse obedience love to God Sure the comfort joy peace assurance subjective that they have in their conscience can be no stronger then the objective and fundamentall certitude of standing persevering overcoming flowing from free-will which is woefully free and indifferent to persevere and stand or not to persevere not to stand but to fall away It s a stronger consolation and the strongest should be the Christians choise that is founded upon the Fathers giving and the Sons receiving of sinners and the faith of salvation to me which relies and leans upon Christs undertaking for me that I shall not be lost nor casten out then upon my undertaking for my self The fifth Argument is from Christs receiving the Seals Who so receives in his body the Seals of the Covenant of Grace Circumcision and Baptism and yet needs no putting off of the body of the sins of the flesh by Circumcision and needs no forgivenesse of sin no regeneration no burying with Christ in Baptism as Col. 2.11 12. Rom. 6.3 4 5. and eats the Passeover and needs not that the Lamb of God take away his sins as Joh. 1.29 since he is holy and without sin he must be under the Covenant and God must be his God in some other Covenant then sinners are for these seals are proper to a Covenanted people strangers and Pagans might not receive them but these in Covenant only Gen. 17.7 Exod. 12.48 Matth. 28.20 Col. 2.11 12. and Christ must have received Seals for other uses and ends then sinners received them to wit to testifie that he was the God of both Jews and Gentiles and that he was the undertaker for us in a Covenant of suretyship for us to perfect a higher command then any mortall man was under to wit to lay down his life for sinners Joh. 10.18 and beside that for our cause he was made under the Law to fulfill all righteousness and so was Circumcised Luk. 2.21 Baptized Matth. 3.13 16 17. did eat the Passeover with the Disciples Mat. 26.18 19 20. Mar. 14.18 Luk. 22.13 14. he in coming under that state in which he must because a man fulfill the Law and be under even Gospel commands so far as they were suteable to his holy Nature testifieth in obeying all commands even of the Morall Law and as the Son of God he was under no such obligation that he was under a speciall ingagement and compact to God for the work of Redemption And we are taught to feel what imbred delight and sweetnesse of peace is in duties when Christ Covenants with God to come under the Law and under the hardest of commands to lay down his life for sinners because it was a Law and command by Covenant that hath most of obedience which hath most of a Law Q. Was Christ such an one as needed seals to his speciall Covenant with the Father Ans. He needed no seals at all to strengthen his faith of dependency for there was no sinfull weaknesse in his faith yet he was capable of growing Luk. 2.52 For the Law requires not the like physicall intention and bendednesse of acts of obedience from the young as from the aged 2. In that the receiving of the seals proves Christ to be Surety of the Covenant of Grace it makes good that he was under the other Covenant and to perform the obedience due to the speciall command of dying as to a command of Covenant 6. Argument is from the Lords libertie If God might in justice have prosecuted the Covenant of Works and Adam and his might justly have suffered eternall death for sin for the Law is holy and just and the threatning Gen. 2.17 just except the Lord had of grace made another Covenant then must the Lord send or not send a Saviour to suffer and be a suffering Redeemer and Surety as pleased him or not pleased him and if Christ may refuse to undertake or willingly agree as pleased him and Christ being Godâ—consubstantiall with the Father might have stood to the Law-way of works For who or what could have hindered him to follow a course of justice against all men then if both agreed to dispense with that Law-way to save man Here is Covenant-condiscension between JEHOVAH and the Son of quieting Law and pitching on a milde Gospel-way 7. Argument from the promises made to Christ He to whom the promises are made as to the seed so as in him they are yea and Amen and he who is eminently the chief heir of the promises as ingaged to make good the promises on the Lords part to give forgivenesse Jer. 31.34 Heb. 8.12 perseverance Jer. 32.39 40. Isa. 54.10 Isa. 59.21 peace Ezek. 34.25 Lev. 26.6.11 12. yea and a new heart Jer. 31.33 Ezek. 11.19 Heb. 8.10 life eternall Joh. 10.28 and to make good the promises upon our part by fulfilling the condition and giving habituall grace Jer. 31.33 Ezek. 36.26 and actuall influences Jer. 31.34 to know the Lord Ier. 32.39 40. Ezek 36.27 to and with him God must strike a Covenant of suretyship that he shall have the anointing in its fulnesse above his fellows without measure to make good all these promises as Mediatour for it is not simply grace and life that the Lord bestows upon his people but grace out of the store-house of the Mediatour God-Man Now this must be given to Christ by promise Gal. 3.16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made he saith not and to seeds as of many but as of one and to thy seed which is Christ He cannot well mean mysticall Christ that is Christ and all his for they are indeed many and numerous as Isai. 2.1 2. Isai. 60.1 2 3 4 5 6. Psal. 22.27 compared with Rev. 5.11 Rev. 7.9 for the promises are made to Christ-God-Man eminently not formally For 2 Cor. 1.20 All the promises of God in him are yea and in him Amen For the promise is made to us for Christ and through his grace then the promise is made first to him and more eminently and to us for him Propter quod unumquodqueâ—ale id ipsum magis tale 2. The promises are fulfilled and made good not because we fulfill the condition but for Christ in whom and by whose merit both the grace promised and the grace habituall and actuall to perform the condition be it faith repentance humility c. is freely given to us 3. Christ is he who makes the Covenant and all the promises Act. 7.32 Who said to Moses I am the God of thy fathers the God of Abraham 34. I bave seen I have seen the affliction of my people which is in Aegypt and I have heard their groaning and am come down to deliver them And now come I will send thee unto Aegypt And v. 35. Moses is made a Ruler and a deliverer by the hands of the Angel that appeared to
sprinkled Altar was also sprinkled with blood for saith the Holy Ghost Heb. 9.22 Almost all things are by the Law purged with blood and without shedding of blood there is no forgivenesse of sins There was no guiltinesse in the Book but these written Lawes and Ceremonies were the hand-writing of Ordinances which was against us which was contrary to us which Christ by his bloody death behoved to blot out take out of the way and nail to His Crosse Colos. 2.14 But another Question riseth Exod. 24.6 What needed the sprinkling of the people with one half of the blood and the sprinkling of the Altar that is Christ the Mediator with the other For 1. Neither the work of dying to redeem man can be divided between Christ and the people nor needed Christ our true Altar forgivenesse of sins Ans. The typicall sprinkling of the people is expounded Heb. 9.14 the purging of the conscience from dead works to serve the living God to obey the Gospel 1 Pet. 1.3 But the sprinkling of the Altar Christ with the blood is a far other thing So the Holy Ghost Heb. 9. He who is constitute the Mediator of a Testament his death must interveen to ratify and make valide in Law the Testament v. 16 17. That the friends of the Testator may have right to the goods that are bequeathed to them in the Testament But Christ is the Mediator of the New Testament v. 15. Ergo c. Now we are to know that Christs dying is considered 1. As a paying of ransone for captives by which in Law and by way of meriâ—e the ranson of the blood of God exceedeth the worth of the bought captives or the crime committed by the captives and so Christs death meriteth to his friends ransoned righteousnesse life pardon 2. His dying is considered as a Testament of a dying friend Now the living friends by vertue of a Testament as a Testament have not â—us and right by buying and selling to the goods tested The essence and nature of a Testament is saved whether the goods that are bequeathed in legacy be the free gift of the Testator not bought with a price by him or goods of the father of the friend to which the friend being a German-brother hath as good right or the same right by birth that the Testator hath How ever the comparison holds in this Christ 1. hath bequeathed to believers these goods 2. The Testament is no Testament nor valide in Law except the Testator be dead No man can sue by Law tested goods if the Testator himself be living Nor can we have right to a new heart forgivenesse perseverance eternall life to grace and glory except Christ our Testator had died But because the Tested goods are more then goods left to us in Testament they are left to us by such a Testament as is both a Testament and a death perfectly meritorious this is superadded to the nature of a Testament and beyond all Testaments yea a death which is a price to ransone us from the wrath to come Therefore Christ so dying in our stead of justice meriteth that the friends should have these goods though they belong by meer grace and free promise to the friends Now this is a most clear ground Christ hath a well purchased right by giving a condign price for the goods and blesâ—sings promised in the Covenant of Grace to us This right he hath by paying a price laying down his life for us This buying is not by necessity of nature of justice but by a voluntary free and uncompelled agreement and Covenant Joh. 10.18 Isai. 53.6 No man can exact upon him Psal. 89.22 2. If the Old Testament was confirmed by the blood of beasts then must the New Testament be confirmed by the blood of Christ prefigured in these But the Old Testament was so confirmed Heb. 9. v. 18 19 20 21 22 23. Ergo now neither Testament nor Covenant was confirmed by blood simply but by the blood of a living creature slain 3. Hence the making of a Covenant was by cutting a calf or a beast in twain and passing between the parts thereof Jer. 34.18 and so they entered into a curse Nehem. 10.29 devoted themselves to destruction wishing they might be cut 〈◊〉 which is a strange kinde of death Math. 24.51 if they should break the Covenant Hence the Phrase of striking a Covenant So the Romans slew a sow So the Romans and Albani made a Covenant as Livius A Herauld or Officer at Arms slew the beast and prayed a curse on the people of Rome that they might be the same way stricken if they should break the Covenant It s like they had it from the Jewes So Christ died to ratifie and confirm the Covenant Exod. 24.6 This is the blood of the Covenant Now the Covenant hath no blood This blood of slain beasts for it is a figurative speech is a signe confirming the Covenant that believers shall have remission of sins in that blood of Christ which is shaddowed forth by the blood of these beasts So Christ the great Shepheard of the flock Heb. 13.20 is said to be brought from the dead 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the blood of the everlasting Covenant Juâ—ius the Article is understood Or as the Hebrew Phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Calvin and Piscator The question may be How did God bâ—ing Christ again from the death by the blood of the everlasting Covenant had the blood of Christ any influence to bring himself back from the dead Or did he by dying merit his own resurrection Ans. Some read the word thus and shun the Question The God of peace who brought again from the dead the great sheepherd of the sheep Understanding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being the great sheepherd or feeder by the blood of the everlasting Covenant So Beza who maks these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be referred to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So as Christs right to be Pastor is in and by his blood and suffering And the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so is not to be constructed with the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But Beza confesseth that he changed the situation of the words But if Christ be made a Pastor and feeder of the sheep by the blood of the eternall Covenant then is he called to be a Pastor by Covenant And what influence hath his death in his Pastoral Office Is it by way of merit Or did Christ merit to himself Hardly if not curiously can we say that though I nothing doubt but Christ gave perfect obedience as man to the Covenant of Works and he did merit as man jure operum life eternall the way that Adam should have merited life eternal so he had never fallen But the words naturally bear this sense as Deodati expounds them that Christ is risen by vertue of his death As it is well said the just surety
perfect satisfaction once given and as a pledge and hostage of peace and Christs appearing for us for ever is an allusion to the Ambassadours sent by forrain Princes who standing in Court before the Prince they are sent unto are speaking tokens that the confederacie of peace stands and that no acts of hostilitie can be done by either of the States and because God is eternally and not by fits just as if he were now angry at sin and then satisfied and pacified when the satisfaction is gone therefore the Lord Christ stands in that Body and Nature in which he once suffered before God for the acquiescing of Justice for ever in the once payed ransone As also Christ remains the substantiall and naturall Head though nature be now glorified of the Mysticall glorified body for ever and of these members under the Covenant of Redemption eternally though all be done and performed in regard of the purchased redemption yet we then glorified once brake the Law and therefore cannot even then stand in our Law-righteousnesse but must stand in our Lord Jesus Christs Righteousnesse which garment shall never cast the collour nor lustre 2. That love to redeemed ones and the soul-satisfaction of Christ in his seed iâ— eternall looking back to the bargain he hath once made as Mediatour he cannot leave off to be satisfied in soul with what he hath done for that were a retracting of his love and a repenting of his royall and Princely tendernesse that as King he once did beat to his conquered subjects whom he hath made his own for ever 3. The soul of God must be eternally well pleased with his Son eternally God-Man and he stands resting in his love Zeph. 3.17 and delighting for ever in all his Sons actings and transactions in the work of Redemption if therefore God have once given to him Godâ—Man the Throne of David to raign over the house of Jacob he must make empty that Throne if he shall leave off to raign And the Angel Luk. 1. speaks of his birth and conception 31. Thou shalt bring forth a son and he shall be great and the Lord God shall give unto him the Throne of his Father David and he shall raign over the house of Jacob for ever And he speaks of the eternity of Davids Throne over Jacobs house so that as he shall be a man and he shall never lay down our nature so shall he be a King upon Davids Throne for ever and ever 4. To triumph eternally over enemies the devils Malignant opposers of his raign sin and hell is an act of a Mediatory King when head and members do both triumph no lesse then it is a part of his royall Mediatory power to crush them all and make them his foot-stool Psal. 110. But Christ and the Armies of heaven when the Marriage-Supper of the Lamb shall come shall ride upon white horses and triumph over enemies for ever Rev. 19.7 13 14 15. and the eternall living of Christ in our nature with all his is a triumphing over the grave and death 1 Cor. 15. and who can prescribe a period and an end of that triumph 5. The River of Water of Life shewed to John Rev. 22. proceeds out of the Throne of God and of the Lamb then hath the slain Lamb a Throne for 〈◊〉 v. 3. And there shall be no more curse there the Law of Works as threatning a curse shall no more be there Gal. 3.10 11 13 14. Deut. 27.26 but the Gospel-blessing shall be there and the Throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it v. 5. And they shall raign for ever and ever 6 If the glorified sit with the Lamb on a Throne as he is set down with his Father upon his 〈…〉 is promised Luk. 22.29 30. Rev. 3.21 If Christs Throne 〈◊〉 removed the Throne of the glorified cannot stand And all alongs where the state of the triumphing Church is dâ—scribed the Lord Jesus keeps the name of the Lamb in reference to the Mediatory sacrifice of the Lamb of God slain for the sins of the world Joh. 1.29 as Rev. 5. The Beasts and the Elders stand round about the Throne saying Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power and riches and wisedome c. Rev. 7.15 Therefore are they before the Throne and serve him night and day in his Temple and he that sitteth on the Throne shall dwell among them They shall hunger no more nor thirst any more 17. For the Lamb that is in the midst of them shall lead them unto the living fountains of waters Though this be expounded of the Church Militant Isa. 49.10 yet it hath not its perfect accomplishment but of the Church before the Throne for all tears are wipt from that Church only And whereas it is said that Christ acts not as Mediatour in heaven its true he acts not as now he acteth for sinners but even then the Lamb v. 17. is the midst of them and leads them when they need neither Temple nor Sun-light beside that the Lord God Almighty is their Temple Rev. 21. The Lamb is their Temple v. 22. And the Lamb is their light v. 23. Now what sort of leading and what influences of worship and light comes from the Lamb is another question And it weighs much with me that its impossible that the precious Ark Godâ—Man and the union personall can be dissolved 7. Christ saith I will be a God to the â—vercomer and he shall inherit all things Rev. 21. And if he be the God of Abraham being dead in regard of the soul that lives far more shall he be a God in an eternall Covenant with Abraham in soul and body glorified though the acts of Christs raigning and the actings of his Covenanted people must be suteable to a glorified state Come Lord Jesus FINIS Isa. 65.8 The first and second Adam Nobility self empty things The first Adam earthly we have more in the second Mortality immortality how due to Adam How life was due to Adam Adam was predestinated to life and how The Law a transient Court for a time The death threatned Genes 2.17 was according to the intent of the Threatner partly legall partly Evangelick What threatnings are and what sorts there be of them Threatnings that are pure threatnings in law show what the Law-giver may jure inflict but not what he shal actually doe and what shall come to passe Threatnings that are both threatnings and also Prophesies reveal both the deserving of the transgressor and the event What is carnall security in beleeving legal threatenings what not What Adam was to beleeve in the threatning what the lying Serpent would have him to beleeve The damned in hell not loosed from the first Command are not obliged to despair and yet are not to believe actuall deliverance What heathens are to believe The Covenant of Works is not contrair to the Gospel How the Gospel may be deduced from the Law if an
scripture The dying for all and every one cannot be coÌ„ditional The promises are so made to all within the Visible Church as all are in Covenant conditionall The unbeleef of justified persons is against the Covenant of Grace and diverse other sins beside finall unbelief are the causes of condemnation All sins against the Gospell even finall unbeleefe are also against the Law and against God Redeemer Immanuel Dicique beatus ante obitum nemo supremaque funera debet How the Covenant of Grace is everlasting yet brokeÌ„ by men The Law commands repentance but not with a promise of life or as a way to life How finall unbeleef is the onelie cause of coÌ„demnation and to whom and how not For whom Christ died he died for their sins and for all their sins There is a world reconciled to whom God imputes no sinne and therefor all the world of Pagans Infidels cannâ—t be such as Christ died for and whose final unbelief he satiâ—fied for The Law the Covenant of Grâ—ce doe not one the same way command faith and forbid unbeleef How the reprobate are under the Covenant of Works Christ one way layes EvaÌ„gelick commands upon the Elect another way on the Reprobate Conditionall perseverance was not promised to Adam The considerable differences betwixt the influences of God given to Adam for his standing in obedience and these influences given to us in the second Adam The obedience of Adam only a duty not a promised benefite our new obedience is both a duty and a promised benefite Four kinds of obediences The excellency of the obedience of Jesus Christ how it was his own properly meritorious The obedience of CHRIST debtfull not dâ—btful in diverse respects Properlie so cal'd satisfactâ—oÌ„ is performed by Christ. Angels obedience properly obedience that â—s of grace and not their own Grace diminisheth of the nature of meriteâ— from the obedience Of Adams obedience how proper it was Gospel-obedience hath less of the nature of obedience then Adams obedience The Law is made as it were Gospel to elect beleevers the Gospel Law to reprobates Obedience from Law and from love how differenced Gospel obedience from grace how excellent and how far above civiliâ—ty in its fairest lustre Tremellius Trostius in Syria Ver. Gal. 3. Qui non fecerit omnia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hyeronâ— Maledictus qui non permanet LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chald. Para. Qui non permanserit Syria Versio Maledictus qui non perâ—â—iceriâ— Arab. Versio Qui non confirmabit Bâ—za Gal. 3.10 Qui non firmarit Magna vis Verbi Jakim Pagnâ— Ari. Montanus Qui non statuerit Faith as lively not as induring to the end the condition of the new Covenant Faith in the first lively act saves justifies How boasting is excluded by grace Boidius Comment Eph. 2. How faith saves not according to the dignitie of its act 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shindlerus notat in cum propter Calv. com Ezek. 20.11 Nulla igitur est in eo absurditâ—s si homines viâ—ant hoc est mereantur ex pacto vitam â—ternam Sed â—i quisâ—legem servat sequetur eum non opus habere Christi gratia Toletus Rom. 3. Adverte fidem non habere ex se officaciam ullam ut actus quidam noster est remitten di reconciliandi sed virtutem totam procedere ex objecto ipso nempe Christo cujus virtutem meritum disposuit Deus per fidem in ipsum applicare peccatori ad justificandum The Adversaries exclude not Law-boasting A twofold imputatioÌ„ of Christ one legall another Evangelick The mistake of Antinomians Obedience to the surety Christ is by a speciall Law Faith presupposeth three unions maketh the fourth We believe that Christs righteousnes may be made ours because it is ours we believe it to be ours also Four or five sort of adversaries who caused various coÌ„siderations of the question of justification in the Old and in the New Test. Of the dominion of the Law Ambro· Mori legi est vivere Deo quia lex dominatur peccatoribus cui ergo dimittuntur peccata is moritur legi boc est liberatur a Lege per corpus Christi hoc consequimur beneficium 〈◊〉 tradens enim corpus suum Servator mortem vicit peccatum damnaviâ— Christ Mystical Christ believers are freed from the law-dominion The Antinomian objectioÌ„ charged upon is answered by him There is a twofold dominion of sin The oldnesse of the letter and the newnes of the Spirit No gifts nor grace can be given by the Law How the Covenant of works is eternall How the Covenant of works is not eternal There is more of the Covenant of grace in the life to come then of the Covenant of works Other differences between the Covenant of Works and that of Grace The perpetuitie of the Covenant of Grace in the life to come Every thing in this Covenant is free Grace How fear of law-fear acts upon a beleever * So the faith of Joseph Mary that Christ their Son shal be great shal sit in the Thron of DAVID his father shal raign over the house of Jacob for ever Luk. 1.32 33. did wel consist with that holy and obedientiall fear of fleeing into Egypt for fear that Herod shuld murther that hopefull young King in his cradle Math. 2. What is to be done under tentations What way a fixed peace is in the children of GOD. A beleever ought not to coÌ„plain of a state of non justificatioÌ„ but ought to complain of a state of non sanctification Why feeling of sin seldome wants unbeleef OfteÌ„ when the believer complains of his own sanctificatioÌ„ because of guiltines lately acted he also unbeleevingly coÌ„plaines of Christ his performed satisfactioÌ„ as if it were weak Christ by his death removes not sense of sin CHRIST died not to remove Gospel sense or any sense of sin flowing from a naturall conscience The room of Christ in both Covenants The first Adam marres all the second ADAM mends all How the Law doth oblidge to both doing and suffering The righteousnesse of Christs person and of his merit Christs active obedience how it is meritorious for us Epist. David Parel de justi ch activa passivâ— 186 Satisfactio est redditiâ— voluntaria equivalentis alioquin indebiti 〈◊〉 alii ex propriis bonis non debitis No satisfaction could be at all except Christ had died because all the satisfaction of a surety might in Law have been refused and the Lord might have eternally punished Adam all his in a Law-way in their persons therefore there was need of a punishment agreed upon between God and the Mediator by a special Covenant this punishment must be satisfactory to the Law which required death Gen. 2.17 and so must Christ-God-man dâ—e The Scripture never speaks of Christs dying but it speaks of this intrinsecall end that they should die to sin and live to God for whom
Christ died now this end is not possible in Pagans who never hear nor can hear the Gospel therefore Christ died not for Pagans These who teach that Christ died for all and every one and made a Covenant of Grace with all every one and sends no more of the Gospel to al every one make the way of salvatioÌ„ more impossible under the second theÌ„ under the first Adam Christs incarnation and death cannot be a fruit of the Mediators death We have not properly right to Christs satisfaction by faith CHRISTS death cannot be applicable to the Reprobate by faith except faith be merited to them by that death Davenantius dissert de morte Christi pag. 49. Respectu mortis Christi voluntas Dei aliter est comparata ad omnes singulos quam esset absque ea nam hoc ipso quod Christus passus est in natura humana sine alio ullo medio interveniente hoc saltem apud Deum effectum ut velit 〈◊〉 homini Caino credenti poenitenti reconciliari peccata remittere vitam aeternam conferre â— tolle respectum hunc mortis Christi promissionibus quoad non-eleâ—tos nihil serii nihil solidi aut veri subesset illud certum quemlibet hominem beneficio mortis Christi hoc juris sibi vendicare posâ—e Ergo hoc jus est impetratum morte Christi etiam reprobis We have not a new heart by beleeving Adams sin is ours not because Adam is our father by nature but because he is our father both by nature and by law Three parts of original sin The free-will of God the ground of the Lords imputeing Adams sin to us The difference between the imputation of Adams sin to us of the righteousnes of Christ to us Christs imputed righteousnesse cannot remove inherent sin or make us such as never sinned Davenantus de morte Christi c. 4. pag. 48. Ex solâ vi horum verborum Christus pro omnibus mortuus est non potest inferri Christum pro omnibus ita mortuum esse ut absolute decreverit hac sua morte omnium salutem efficaciter insallibiliter operari quia satis vere proprie pro aliquo mori is dicatur qui bono alterius procurando moâ—itur quamvis ille alter suo vitio nihil commodi inde percipiat Christ cannot be said to die for all if these all may eternally perish No Scripture warranteth us to say that Christ died for all with one intention to apply his death to the elect and with another intention to apply no death at all to the reprobate Christ sustained not two persons upon the crosse Christ was not cut off to put an end to all their transgressions for whom he died by their way who teach that he died for all without exâ—ception There is nothing purchased to the most part for whoÌ„ Christ dies but a pelagian power to apply which power all men have suppone CHRIST had never died according to these who teach that CHRIST died for all and every one How many ways it may be said Christ died in our room stead The sufficiency of Christs death depends upon the iâ—finitness of his person not upon the free decree of God Whether all beleeve and be saved or none believe or be saved its true that whosoever believe shal be saved but the truth of it dependeth not upon Christs dying for all and for every one None are saved by beleeving that Christ died for them except thâ—y also believe that Christ rose also ascended interceeâ—ded for theÌ„ God hath no intention to save all though he say all that believe shall be saved nor comes such an offer froÌ„ CHRISTS intention to die for all and every one One that hath the Tongues may preach the Gospel to the Nation he comes unto but that preachablnesse of the Gospel comes in in no sort from the Lords sending his Son to die for all and every one The Gospel is not preachable to all and every Nation at all and every age difference of time The conditionall promise either of life to all that shall keep the Law or of salvatioÌ„ to all that beleeve in Christ can inferre no intention or good-will â—n God to bestow the end the means upon either the one or the other or any good-will toward their persons Conditionall promises place nothing absolutely in persons but only the connexion of things means â—nd work reward If the Gospel of it self were Preachâ—ble at all times to all Nations it were the sin of the Prophets not to Preach to all Nations whether they can speak wiâ—h all Tongues or no. 2. And all Nations should be in a fit câ—pacity at all times to be the Churchâ—s of Christ and â—ll Natiâ—Ì„s should be Chuâ—ches in Covenant with God in Christ. It s false that Christ so died for us that is in our stead as that in our stead hee fulfilled the Law and performed all active obedience passive by doing and dying that God can require of us How Socinians will have Christ to die for us Socinus de Servatore l. 2. c. 8. dictio pro causam finalem notat Ioan Crellius advers Grotiam par 1. c. 5. Cateche Râ—ccovie c. 8. pag. 183 184. Loco vice peccatorum nostrorum mortuum esse nihil delutiâ—â— qui dat pendit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro captis in fuga aut loco fugae id pendit Jac. Armin. Antiper edit Bertianae pag. 676. Quod si statuamus talem mediatioris rationem ut omnium electorum peccata actu ab ipsis ablaâ—a in Christum translâ—ta sint qui poenam pro illis passus illos actu ipso â— poenis liberaverit tum obedientia ab illis postulata fuerit qui illam praestitit vitam aeternam illa praestatione non sibi sed illis meruerit non â—â—cus quam si ipsi Mediatorem nostro loco constituissemus per eum DEO solvissemus debita nostra jam simul statuendum est secundum ipsum justitiae DEI legis rigorem electis deberi immunitatem â— peccaâ—is vitam aeternam eosque ista bona â— DEO postulare jure solutionis emptionis absque eo ut Deus postulare ullo jure fidem in Christum conversionem ad Deum possit One may in Law be a real and true satisfying surety for another thogh the debter neither request nor Covenant with him to undertake yea though he know no thing of the sureties willingness to undertake and so Christ is our surety Arminius sides with Socinus How wee satisfied justice in CHRISTS dying so that we caÌ„not suffer eternally in hell if CHRIST suffered for us on the Crosse without wrong to Divine justice Christ dies not so in our room and stead as that we cannot in justice die the second death except there be a breach of Covenant between the Lord and Christ. God demands not of us faith and repentance by necessity of divine justice for
so he should fail against justice with all glory to him be it spoken if he should exact these from us Christ died not for our good only but also in our stead There be considerable differences between Christs punishment and that punishmeÌ„t which was due to uâ— eternally A fivefold onenes law identity samenes betweeÌ„ Christ the surety and sinners for whom he satisfied Scripture and arguments froÌ„ Scripture prove that Christ died in our room and stead If Christ was made the curse that was due in law to us that blessing not due to us might coÌ„e upon us then he suffered in our place Oratio pro Arâ—hia Poeâ—à Oratio pro Marcello 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Demosthe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isocrates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Col. 1.24 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Homer 〈◊〉 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Three for one slain 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rex 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Il. 1. Rom 9. ◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 10.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 15.13 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 11.50 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 5 6· 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Sam. 18. Syria versio Quis dabit me mori loco tui Chaldae Paraph Vellem quod mortuus essem tu mansisses â—odiè fili mi. Ge. 22. LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 44. LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mar. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 20.28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 23. dabis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Daebis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prov. 11.8 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Job 34. â—4 Heb as before Ps. 45.16 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Job 16 4 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat 2.22 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Trostius Syria versio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Loco Herodis patris sui 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tremel Trostius vice piscis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ro 12.17 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tremellius Trostius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro multis sed Mat. 2.22 vertunt loco 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro vel vice omnis hominis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loco seu vice vestri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loco â—â—ium suarunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vice populi 1 Tim. 2.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loco omnis hominis 1 Pet. 2.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro nobis vice nostri In stead or â—or another cannot note alwayes for the profit and good of another but it must make non-sense Socinus de Servato l. 2. c. 8. Cateches Raccoviens c. 8. pa. 183 184. The vain reason of Socinians that Christ died not in the place and room of sinners because he died not in the place and room of sinnes and transgressions retorted answered We legally died suffered for sin in Christ altho many of us for whom he died were not then born and neither we nor our sins had any being CHRIST willeth not that we answer plea's that he hath answered and that by unbeleef wee trouble our selves with debt that he hath payed Socinus de Servato l. 2. c. 8. Quomodo igitur vice loco nostri Christus est mortuus si nos quoque perpetuo â—idem mortis generi expositi sumus Crellius adversus Grotium c. 9. par 9. How wee die though Christ have died for us We depose CHRIST with reverence to his holiness from his office of Mediator when we embark having once beleeved in him in a new plea with the Law We are not to act of new a plea with the Law being now in another kingdome and freed from the Law We are not to desire a Law-wakening under Gospel-deadnesse VVe sinned in AdaÌ„ though we had neither being nor hand in making Adam either our naturall or Law-head so may we be legally crucified with Christ our surety though we had no hand in appointing Christ to be our surety All the requisits to a reall satisfaction are in Christs dying for us What mortification is Mortification comes froÌ„ Christs death as from a real cause and from a real new principle procured by the death of Christ. Gospel arguments how and upon whoÌ„ they work When reasoÌ„ is green adherence to a course by perswasion is unstable Four sorts of considerable actings in one mortified 1. No actings are in the mortified at most moving objects The motions of grace are quiet slow The actings of a mortified man in order to all created things are indifferent not peremptory not so absolutly fixed but he can qâ—iâ—e them 〈◊〉 Goâ— Actings terminated on God may be fiery Mortification sweetly closes with all providences Mortification or deadnesse meerly naturall only because the Tools are broken the horse wearied hath nothing to do with the death of CHRIST 2. Compelled mortification is not froÌ„ Christs death 3. Philosophick and bookish mortification not from Chrst crucified 4. Superstitious and religious mortification Luther Com. on Gal. 6 14 5. Pharisaâ—cal mortification 6. Civil mortification D. Preston Serm. 1. of mortification p. 8 p. 9. 1. Mortification to self 2. Mortification to will Much will much life all will is no mortification 3. Mortification to life 4. Mortification to wisdom there is a paper sicknes for maÌ„y books 5. Mortification to learning books Ptolemaeus Philadelphius King of Egypt gathered in the Bibliotheck of Alexandriâ— 40000. books ad luxuriam non ad utilitatem ait Livius and they were all burnt Serenus Sammoniâ—â—â— left in Testament to Gordianus junior three score and two thousand books Petrarcha Librorum larga copiae est operosa sed delectabilis sarcina animi jucunda distractio libri quosdam ad scientiam quosdam ad insaniam deduxere dum plus hauriâ—nt quam digerunt Vt stomachis sic ingentis nausea saepius nocuit quam fames 6. MortificatioÌ„ to riches The simple desire of riches is not the sin Whether acts of covetousnesse may consist with mortification and how 7. Deadnesse to honour Sis pro nobis peripsema Plutarchus De profectu virtutum lib. 11.5.237 Themistocles somnum sibi Miltiadis Tropheo adimi eoque se excitari electo Plutarch ib. pag. 239. Quid mihi nunciaturus es nisi Homerum revixisse Men may judg themselves mortified to honour because they are deadned to riches and not be mortified Plutarch de capienda ex hostibus utilitate lâ—bel n. 3â— pag. 241. Zeno cum nunciaretur navim ipsius qua negotiabatur fractam Bene facis inquit fortuna quae nos intra palliolum compellis All sins are not mortified with the like labour 8. Deadnesse to injuries Plutarch lib. de liberis educandis moral 1. n. 15.20 pag. 17. Aâ— si me Asinus calce feriisset jussuri eratis ut contra eum calcem impingerem Omnibus hoc ei exprobrantibus calcitronem adolescentem appellantibus