for it is one thing not to account us unrighteous and another thing to esteem us righteous Which that we may the better understand we must know how these terms are different Not just and just Unjust and just Not just and unjust Not unjust and just Not just and just are contradictories Vnjust and just are partly privatives partly contraries Not just and unjust also Not unjust and just are diversa We must also know that Unjust and Just are not immediate contraries for the medium is innocent who is neither unjust nor just Now whereas the remission of sins is a removing or putting away of our sins but the imputation of justice is the adjudging of it to be ours by that we are accounted for not unjust or innocent by this for just Now who knowes not that it is more to be just then to be innocent only and not only to have done no evil but also to have done good But although these two now in man differ not in subject but in some respect only yet heretofore they differed in subject also For Adam in Paradice was innocent but not just for he was at length to attain justice by his perfect obedience 2. They differ in their proximate and proper causes for Christs death and passion are the cause or remission of sins which are expiated by them Heb. 9.22 Without blood there is no remission 1 Joh. 1.7 The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin But the cause of the imputation of justice is Christs perfect obedience Rom. 5.19 For as by the disobedience of one man many are made sinners so by the obedience of one many are made righteous We have shewed above Cap. 18. that this obedience is that actual by which he fulfilleth the whole Law for us 3. They differ in their proper effects for by remission of sins we are freed from damnation Rom. 5.9 Much more then now being justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him But by imputation of righteousnesse we attain over and above life eternal Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousnesse shall reign c. so Gal. 4.5 both effects are put Made under the Law that he might redeem them that are under the law that is under the curse of the law and that wee might receive adoption It is then a greater benefit to redeem a Slave and being redeemed to adopt him then onely to redeem it is a greater favour to give and forgive then barely to forgive therefore that justification is lame by which onely Christs passion is imputed and which onely consisteth in remission of sins Here divers things are objected 1. The Scripture in many places makes mention of Christs Passion or Remission of sins onely But this is no wonder for in many places it speaks Synecdochically its sufficient that it explains it self in the above-cited places 2. The Apostle promiscuously useth these phrases as equavalent to forgive sins and to impute righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 6. But we answer that it is one thing for propositions to be equivalent and an other thing for one proposition to follow upon or to conclude another as Paul out of this phrase of David Psal 32.2 Blessed are they whose sins are forgiven them c. collects this that David doth describe him to be blessed to whom righteousnesse is imputed without works The reason of the consequence is because if the remission of sins be free then so is also the imputation of justice Although then that is not formally spoken by David which Paul affirmeth v. 5. yet it is spoken by way of consequence yea it is an argumentation as Chrysostome saith from the lesser to the greater for if he be blessed whose sins are forgiven then much more blessed is he to whom besides righteousnesse is imputed 3. To whom sins are forgiven to him also righteousnesse is imputed and whosoever is freed from damnation he is inheritor of life eternal therefore these benefits are not different Ans Those things are not the same which are in the same subject together For so it would follow that Vocation Justification and Sanctification are not different benefits because every man that is called is also justified and sanctified 4. In the pardon of sins there are the sins of omission pardoned and therefore by that man is made perfectly just They adde the reason of the consequence Because he performs all things who omits nothing Ans The consequence is false because there is one cause why we are said to have omitted nothing another why we are said to have done all things We are said to have omitted nothing because Christ hath suffered for our sins also of omission But we are said to have performed all things because he hath for us performed all things Besides to have omitted nothing and to have done all things differ in respect of punishment and reward for although the fault and the punishment are remitted to him who omits what he should do yet for this there is no reward due to him 5. It is absurd that the same debt should be paid twice If therefore satisfaction is made for sin by Christs suffering satisfaction also is not to be demanded by active obedience Ans Here is Ignoratio Elenchi for there is is not a double payment of the same debt but two parts of one payment Neither is Christs active obedience required to make satisfaction for sin but to satisfie for our interest in the Kingdom of heaven 6. If it be the same thing to be liberal and not to be prodigal nor covetous then it is the same thing to be just and not unjust Ans The Assumption is false because these are not immediate opposites for there are men who are neither covetous nor prodigal nor liberal 7. If it be the same thing to be clothed and to have nakednesse covered then it is the same thing to have our sinnes remitted and justice imputed because by the garment of Christs righteousnesse our sins are covered Ans This is an unfit simile for the sinner must not only be clothed but he must be first unclothed to wit from the rags of sin Therefore as Joshuah the High-Priest had his filthy garments taken from him first then new garments were put upon him and a crown on his head Zac. 3.4 5. So we also first must be divested of this dirty garment of sin then we are clothed with the glorious garment of Christs righteousnesse XVI The form of Justification taken passively is whereby believers lay hold on Christ with all his merits by the hand of faith and apply him to themselves XVII The end of that benefit is Gods glory and our salvation XVIII Out of this commemoration of causes we firmly gather That man is not justified before God by his good works and merits Reas I. For to be justified by grace and by merit are repugnant Rom. 3.24 They are justified freely by his grace v. 28.
head and root of all mankind IX Whatsoever therefore he received and lost he received and lost it for himself and posterity As the head contains Reason both for it selfe and the members as a Gentleman keeps or loses his Copy-hold for himself and posterity as out of a venemous root nothing can proceed that 's wholsome so all that are come of Adam naturally are born guilty of that primitive sin X. That Primitive sin therefore is not only personal but natural also because by it whole Nature is destroyed of which also Adams posterity is held gâ—ilty to wit all that are naturally sprung from Adam Christ then is excepted from this guilt for he was born of Adam but not by Adam not by natural generation but by the Vertue of the Holy Ghost XI As therefore the Person infected Nature so afterward Nature infected the Person XII We religiously believe that our first Parents were received into favour by God CHAP. X. Of Original Sinne and Free-will THat Sin which is derived from the first or primitive Sin is either original or actual original Sin is that native corruption derived into the whole man and to the whole race of man naturally descending from Adam whereby man having utterly lost his freedome to good becomes prone to evil The RULES I. This sin in Scripture is named by way of excellencie Sin and the Body of sina Sinful sin b Inhabiting sin c The law of our members d The old man e Fleshf. a Rom. 6.6 b Rom. 7.13 c Rom. 7.17 d Rom. 7.23 e Rom. 6.6 f Joh. 3.6 Gal. 5.17 II. It is called also Concupiscence Rom. 7.7 I had not known lust or concupiscence unlesse the Law had said Thou shalt not covet or lust III. Therefore the Papists do erroniously exempt it from being a sin reckoning it among the works of God By the name of Concupiscence is understood either that natural faculty of desire which was in man even before his fall or that corruption which naturally adheres to it as it is in the first act and as it inclines man onely to evil IV. The proximate cause of original sin is the guilt of the first sin in respect of which it is a most just punishment from God to wit a part of that death which God threatned to man V. Although the soule is immediately infused by God into man yet being united to the body it is made guilty presently of the first sin imparted to the whole man and therefore is infected with original contagion VI. Neither for this cause doth original sin cease to be sin in that it is not wittingly nor willingly committed for it is sufficient that the irregularity of our nature is present though spontaneousnesse be absent VII From this original sin except Christ alone no man is free not the blessed Virgin Mary Neither is it only in Infants but it is in the embryo scarce at yet conceived and before the birth and it appears still more and more as the rapacity of wolves shews it self in their whelps Psal 51.7 Behold I was born in iniquity and in sin hath my mother conceived me 2 Cor. 5.21 for he hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin VIII Original sin doth consist not onely in an impotency and ineptitude to goodnesse but also in pronenesse to evill neither is it onely the amission of original good but also the immission of the contrary evil IX By Original sin our natural gifts are corrupted but supernatural are utterly lost X. The Vnderstanding remained but darkned the Will remained but depraved the inferiour Appetite remained but altogether vitiated XI Hence it is that in natural and civil actions an irregenerate man can doe no good without speciall grace XII Without this special grace no excelling thing could be performed by the Gentiles XIII Whatsoever good then that was which they did it was mixed with much vanity so that their cheif vertues were in Gods sight but glorious enormities XIV For these are not good works which are good in themselves but which are done well A work is said to be good either univocally or equivocally univocally so such a work is simply good in respect of all circumstances equivocally a work is good in it self but withall vitious either in respect of the subject or object or means or the end for if we look upon the actions of the Gentiles we shall finde rhat they aimed more at their own then at Gods glory in them XV. Although the affections of the wicked are kept in by God as with a Bit yet they are not healed XVI But supernatural gifts were utterly lost to wit a A. R. When it is said here that supernatural gifts were utterly lost is meant that Faith was utterly lost and Faith is the cheif of all supernatural gifts now that Faith was utterly lost in our first Parents is plain because they gave credit to the Serpent therefore they believed not that God was either true or omnipotent they thought to hide themselves from him therefore they believed not his omnipresence and in a manner Adam accused God for giving him the woman that made him sin and in this he lost the faith of Gods goodnesse and justice yet though man lost his Faith he did not utterly lose all other spiritual gifts for he did not utterly lose the knowledge of God nor did his posterity for that is learned by the things that are made Rom. 1.20 nor did he utterly lose the fear of God for Adam confesseth Gen. 3. that when he heard that voice of God he was afraid which Fear though servile yet it is a supernatural gift but of an inferiour rank the claritie of the intellect the rectitude of the will and the conformity of the appetite with reason XVII b A. R. When it is said here that there is no spiritual knowledge in us this must not be taken subjectively but causatively for there is knowledge in us because the soule is the subject of knowledge but this knowledge or performance of spiritual things is not of us or from us for of our selves we cannot think a good thought Again when it is said here that the principle of this knowledge is not in us the meaning is that the prime or chief principle is not in us for that is grace yet the secondary or subordinate principle of knowledge is in us and that is the minde Lastly it is said here that this principle is not in us either in act or in possibility we must not conceive that here is meant possibility passive for there is in us a power to receive spiritual knowledge when it is infused or else we are stones but here is meant an active possibility for we are not agents but patients in the first act of our Conversion so that there is no power nor possibility in us to illuminate ours own mindes or to rectifie our own wils Hence there is no principle of knowledge or performance of spirituall things in us
either in act or in possibility XVIII They seek then the house in the ashes who ascribe to an unregenerate man free-wil or other faculties by which he may doe well or prepare himself to his own conversion or to the acceptation of Gods grace For this is the errour of Pelagians and Semipelagians XIX Mans will remained free from coaction but not to good and evill XX. Yea it is free to evil onely and therefore deserves rather to be called servile then free As for the understanding the natural man comprehends not the things that are of Gods spirit 1 Cor. 2.14 If you look upon the will the imagination of mans heart is onely evil Gen. 8.21 Finally the Scripture cries out that the whole man having lost his spiritual life lieth dead in sin Eph. 2.1 Col. 2.13 XXI Although this sin is pardoned in the sanctified parents notwithstanding by generation it is transmitted to posterity The reason is because the corruption dwelling in us â— not altogether taken away by pardon although the guilâ— be done away and as faith is the gift not of generation but of regeneration so man not as he is regenerate but as man begets man even as seeds being winnowed from the ears chaff and husks doe spring up again with the same CHAP. XI of Actual Sin SO much of Original sin Actual sin is whereby Gods law is broken by thoughts desires words or deeds The RULES I. According to the diversitie of circumstances there are diverse sins II. From the efficient cause sin is either of publique or of private persons as they are in more or lesse dignity III. From the matter which are things thought desired said or done IV. From the form it is either of commission or omission V. From the end it is either of incogitancy or of affectation and against conscience and that rather of malice then of infirmity or contrarily rather of infirmity then of malice VI. From the subject it is of the soule chiefly or of the body or of both VII From the object it is either committed against God or our neighbour VIII Sin committed against God is either with a kinde of unwillingnesse or with a full desire this latter sin the scripture cals the sin against the holy Ghost and to death Matt. 11.32 1 Joh. 5.16 IX The sin against the holy Ghost or to death is when one is convicted in his conscience by the testimony of the holy Spirit resisteth notwithstanding the same spitefully wantonly and with a high-hand X. Sin against man is committed either against superiours or inferiours or equals being knit by fewer or more bands of blood affinity c. XI From the adjuncts a sin is either such of it self or by accident Such are scandals in things otherwise indifferent see Rom. 14. XII No sin of its own nature is venial or so smal as not to merit damnation By this maxime the Popish errour that some sins of themselves are venial is condemned the reason is manifest by the object and the effect for there is no sin which is not conjoined with the offence of Gods majesty XIII Yet in respect of the event to wit Christs merits and Gods favour all sins are pardonable except finall infidelity and the sin against the holy Ghost Not as though these sins were greater then Grace and Christs merit but because they resist grace and Christs merit and despise both XIV We are to judge of the degrees of other sins by the circumstances the consideration of which doth aggravate or lessen them Thus the sin of a superiour is greater then of an inferiour for sin is so much the more conspicuous by how much the more eminent he is that sinneth The sin of desire is greater then the sin of thought alone A sin committed in word and deed is greater then that which is in thought and desire sin committed with affectation is greater then that which is done of incogitancy the sin of commission is greater then oâ— omission if it be in the same kinde the sin against God is greater then against man that sin is greater which is committed against him to whom we are most beholding for favours then against another for example A sin against our Parents is greater if it be in the same kinde then against a brother a scandal against a weak brother is greater then against a stronger CHAP. XII Of the miseries which follow sin HItherto of sin now of the misery that follows upon sin This misery is either temporal or eternal both which is either corporal or spiritual The RULES I. God comprehended all mans misery under the name of death Gen. 2.27 What day thou shall eat of it to wit of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil thou shalt dye the death II. There be foure degrees of this death III. The first degree is death spiritual which is the privation of spiritual life of this man being destitute he liveth onely to sin Rev. 3.1 I know thy works in that thou art said to live but thou art dead IV. The second degree is the death of affliction which is the privation of original happinesse and the inflicting of all sorts of calamities Exod. 10.17 Pray to the Lord that be would remove this death from me V. The third decree is death corporal which is the privation of this life and the resolution of the body into dust and the reversion of the soule to God Eccles 12.9 He shall return to dust from whence he came and the soule to God that gave it The soule returns to God either as to a Father or as to a just Judge and although by the bounty of Christ our death is become a passage from this life to that which is eternal yet in this place we consider it as it is in it self VI. The fourth degree is death eternal or the state of the damned which in relation to death corporal is called the second death Revel 21.8 VII We must imagine nothing of the state of the damned which is not in Scripture VIII This state consisteth in the privation of the chief good and infliction of the greatest evil IX The privation of the cheife good is whereby they are for ever excluded from the fellowship of God and of the blessed Mat. 25.41 Go ye cursed X. But the chief evil shal be a communion for ever with the Devil and his Angels Mat. 25.41 Into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil c. XI The place appointed for the damned is Hell XII But where Hell is we are not to search or enquire XIII 'T is sufficient that in Scripture it is named Gehennaa a fiery Furnaceb the place of tormentc a Prisond a bottomless pite the lake of firef burning with fire and brimstoneg a Matth. 5.22 b Mat. 13.42 c Luk. 26.28 d 1 Pet. 3.19 e Rev. 9.1 f Rev. 20.15 g Rev. 21.8 XIV In the pains of the damned we are to consider the multitude greatness and continuance XV. Their multiplicity
covering as it were the Divine nature X. In the Court was the Altar of Burnt-offerings overlaid with brasse representing Christs flesh united to the Divinity and withall his strength of suffering any thing for us the Altar also of Incense intimating Christs Intercession for us XI There also was the brazen Laver appointed for washing which signified that we are purged by the blood of Christ that we may offer to God acceptable sacrifices XII In the Holy-place or Court of the Priests was the Table and on it the Shew-bread and the golden Candlestick by which was taught that Christ is to his people meat drink and light to life eternal XIII In the same place were the Vessels of Gold ready for sprinckling and Incense representing both Christs death and Intercession XIV In the Holy of Holies was the golden Censer proper to the High-Priest alone and there was also the Ark of the Covenant XV. The Ark was made of Cedar-wood and covered with Gold which represented both Christs natures XVI The Tables of the Law the Manna and Aarons rod kept within the Ark representing Christ as he teacheth nourisheth and ruleth his People XVII The cover of the Ark called the Propitiatory together with the Cherubims from whence God promised to speak with Moses was the Type of Christ covering our sins defending us by his Angels and expounding to us the word and counsel of his Father The manner of the Levitical service consisted partly in the things that were offered to God partly in holy times The things that were offered to God were sacrifices both Expiatory or of Propitiation Eucharistical or of Thanksgiving The Expiatory sacrifice or Peace-offering was when the faithful witnessed by the killing and offering of living creatures that they in themselves were guilty of death and that they placed their confidence in the blood of Christ as of that immaculate Lamb who was to be offered afterward for the sins of the world The sacrifice of Thanksgiving was offered either for all sins or for some certain sins The sacrifice that was offered for all sinnes was called a Holocaust or burnt-offering for it was performed by burning the whole sacrifice The sacrifice for certain sins called the Sacrifice of Redemption was either for the sinne it self or for the guilt thereof The Sinne-offering was when a sinne was expiated which had been committed out of error or ignorance See Levit. 4.2 3. The sacrifice for the guilt called the Trespas-offering was when a sin was expiated which had been done wittingly yet out of infirmity Lev. 5. 7. The Eucharistical sacrifice or Offering of Thanksgiving was to testifie the gratitude of the offerer These were performed by offering of gifts onely or by offering of living creatures also The sacrifice of gifts called Libatio or Meat-offering was that in which meat drink oyle salt frankincense c. were offered The sacrifice of Living-creatures was performed either by burning the fat of the sacrifice or by killing and eating of the beasts also That was called the Sacrifice of Pacification This the Sacrifice of Praise The holy times were either of dayes or of yeares Of dayes were 1. The morning of each day and the two evenings in which the daily sacrifice was offered 2. The seventh or Sabbath-day which was a type of that sanctification and rest which was to be obtained by Christ 3. The Calends or New-moons or first day of the moneth The times of the yeares were either anniversary or every yeare or else after the expiration of divers years The anniversary Solemnities were either greater or lesser The greater were the Feasts of Easter Pentecost and of Tabernacles The feast of Easter was celebrated the fiftieth day of the first moneth as a remembrance of the peoples delivery from Egypt and as a type of their future delivery by Christ The feast of Pentecost was kept the fifty day after Easter as a memorial of the Law given upon mount Sinai and as a type of that new Law which was to be written in our hearts by the Holy Ghost who was to be sent afterward in a visible form At this feast were offâ—red the first-fruits hence it was called the Feast of the first-fruits The feast of Tabernacles was solemnized the fifteenth day of the seventh moneth as a remembrance of that gracious preservation of the Israelites in the desart in tents and as a type of Christs incarnation Thanks also were given to God at this feast for the fruits and harvest whence it was called the Feast of Collection The lesser solemnities were The feast of Trumpets celebrated the first day of the seventh moneth in which the civil yeare had its begining the feast also of Expiation which fell out upon the tenth day of the same moneth That did represent the sounding of the Gospel this of our atonement to be made by Christ The Solemnities that were kept after divers years were the Sabbathical year and the year of Jubile The Sabbathical year or year of weeks was every seventh year in which there was a cessation from tilling the ground and from demanding of debts The yeare of Jubile was every fiftieth yeare in which all possessions returned to their owners and the Hebrew servants were set free A type of our freedome from Sin and Satan by Christ So much for the Ceremonial Law the Judicial Law was that which belonged to the constituting of the Jewish Commonwealth The RULES I. As the Ceremonial Law had relation to God so the Judicial to our Neighbour II. The Judicial Law binds us in those things that agree with the Moral Law and were of common right III. But what was of private right and commanded for the Jewish Commonwealth in particular doe no more bind us then the Municipal Lawes of other Commonwealths CHAP. XV. Of the Gospel and how it agrees with and differs from the Law HItherto we have seen out of the Law the necessity of Redemption now we are to see the truth thereof in the Gospel The Gospel is the joyful news or the Doctrine of the Son of God being sent into this world that he might assume our nature and might undergo the curse of the Law for us that by his perfect obedience to the same he might obtain life eternall to us The RULES I. The Law and Gospel agree in the chief efficient cause to wit God and in the instrumental namely the written Word but they differ in their outward instrumental causes both because the Law was delivered by Moses and the Gospel by Christ fully and also because the Law is by nature known to man but the Gospel is not except by Gods gratious revelation II. They agree in their common matter because on both sides obedience is required by promises and threatnings but they differ in their particular matter for the Law principally teacheth what we must do and the Gospel what we must believe III. They agree in their common form because on both sides the Looking-glass of perfect obedience is
Isa 6.2 How much lesse then could any man intercede whereas there is not one just Person Rom. 3.10 The evill that was to be taken away was sin and the consequents of sin the wrath of God the power of Satan both temporal and eternal death Now I pray by whose suffering could that infinite Majesty be satisfied which was offended unlesse by his suffering who was also Infinite By whose Intercession could the wrath of God be appeased but by his onely who is that best beloved Sonne of God By whose strength could Satan with the whole power of darknesse be overcome except by his who in power exceeds all the Devils who finally could overcome death except he who had the power over death Heb. 2.15 But the good things that were to be restored were perfect righteousness adoption into sons the Image of God the gifts of the Holy Ghost life eternal and such like but now who could bestow that righteousness on us except he who is justice it self Who is so fit to make us the sons of God as he who is by nature the Son of God Who was so fit to restore in us the Image of God as he who is himself the image of the invisible God Who can bestow on us the holy Spirit so assuredly as he from whom the Spirit proceedeth Who at last can give us life eternal but he who is life it self Joh. 1.4 XII That he might be man the justice of God required which as it leaves not sin unpunished so it punisheth not sin but in that nature which sinned The first branch of this Rule is plain both by the justice and by the truth of God By his justice because God by this doth not onely resist but also punish sin Psal 5.5 6 7. For thou art not a God that hast pleasure in wickedness nor shall evil dwell with thee the foolish shall not stand in thy sight thou hatest all workers of iniquity thou shalt destroy them that speak lies the Lord will abhor the bloody and deceitfull man Now by the truth of God because the threatning which was given before the fall could not be in vain therefore Socinus is idle and foolish who that he might overthrow the merit of Christ feigns such a justice of God which doth not necessarily inflict eternal death or require satisfaction and which in this respect can be content to lose its own right but if sins are to be punished they were surely to be punished in our nature for to man the Law was given and to man death was threatened therefore it lies upon man to suffer the punishment XIII It was requisite that God and man should be united in one Person that he might be a Mediator between God and us He was therefore the medium between God and man that is he was at the same time God and man that he might perform those things which were to be effected towards God and man Heb. 5.1 These works of God and man do require both natures in the same person of which in the next Chapter more at large The parts of Christs Incarnation are two to wit the Conception and the Nativity In the Conception three things for the better understanding are considerable the forming the assuming and the personal union of the humane nature The forming of the humane nature of Christ is that whereby it was produced without the help of man of the Virgins blood by the operation of the Holy Ghost The RULES I. The Holy Ghost is not the material but the efficient cause of Christs conception For he was conceived not of his substance but by his power not by generation but by his commanding force and benediction Aug. II. The next or proximate matter was the blood of the blessed Virgin III. the form of Christs conception consisteth in the preparing and sanctifying of the Virgins blood by the vertue of the Holy Ghost in the forming of the body whereby together at the same instant it was made perfect and not successively as the bodies of other men are Lastly in the inspiring of the reasonable soul Whereas fourty dayes are appointed in ordinary generation for the time of forming the embryo the body of Christ was perfected in a moment otherwise not Christ the man but an embryo had been conceived IV. The end of Christs miraculous conception was that he might be free from Original sin for this sticks close to all that are of and by Adam that is to all who are naturally descended from him but it was needfull that Christ should be born without sin that we might have a holy High Priest Heb. 7.17 The assumption of the humane nature is whereby Christ assumed truly a humane soul and body with all their affections proprieties and infirmities yet without sin The RULES I. Christ assumed not man but the humanity not the person but the nature For otherways he had not been God-man and one person but two persons and so there had been two Christs The Scripture stiles him Emanuel because the same who is with us that is to say who is man is also God Isa 7.14 the same eternall Word is said to be made flesh Joh. 1.1 and the same is called both Davids Son and his Lord Mat. 22.42 II. And not onely did he assume a true humane body consisting of three dimensions and a true soul but also the essential Properties III. Yea and he took our infirmities too but not those damnable ones but such as were faultlesse and miserable These infirmities are either of the body or of the soule Again the infirmities of the body are from external causes as the calamities and torments inflicted by enemies Or they have their being from some internal cause and they follow wholly our nature since it fell front its primitive happinesse as to be cold to be hot to thirst to hunger to be in pain to grow weary and such like But the infirmities of the soule are sadnesse feare ignorance c. IV. So likewise he took upon him our affections but free from all disorder or inclination to evil The Personal Union is whereby the Person of the Son of God did communicate his Hypostasis or Personality to the humane nature and he so knit it to himself and with his divine nature that the propriety of both natures being entire he is in one Person God and man The RULES I. Christs humane nature hath no other or particular Hypostasis or subsistence then that of the Word that is of the Son of God In this point Christ differs from all other men because every man hath a peculiar Hypostasis or manner of subsisting by which he differs from other Persons besides his Essence consisting of body and soul but Christs humane nature wanting a proper subsistence is assumed into the fellowship of the Hypostasis of the divine nature neither doe we inferre from hence that the humane nature in Christ in this point is more inferiour then in other men for it is so much the
We consider the greatness of his love 2. The greatness and multitude of his sufferings 3. The dignity of his Person 4. The holiness of his life his Satisfaction The reason because he did not suffer for himself in any thing but all for us II. Therefore those innumerable sufferings which Christ endured untill his last journy to Jerusalem are not to be separated from the price of Christs redemption for although the Passion of Christ wch went before his last agony might be called a preparative to his death yet it is indeed an integral part of satisfaction As it cannot be denied that the payment of an hundred pounds by him who oweth divers tuns of gold is an integral part of the payment although it be but a small sum in respect of the whole and principall debt III. Yet the Scripture synecdochically and by way of excellency doth describe his last passion as the price of our Redemption and his death or oblation on the altar of the cross as an expiatory sacrifice Of this see the 9. and 10. chapters to the Hebrews IV. The principal efficient cause of this Passion was the Holy Trinity the ministering causes were Christs enemies both Jews and Gentiles V. The Person that suffered for us is not the Father nor the Holy Ghost but the Son of God VI. Although God is rightly said to suffer yet the God-head suffered not God suffered in the flesh not with the flesh VII The sufferings of Christ were divers of which there were three ranks to wit some before his death death it self and some after death VIII Of those that went before his death some were internal some external IX The internal were his sadness anxieties and tortures proceeding from the fierceness of Gods wrath and the conflict he had with that tentation of dereliction which cast him into that bloody sweat and made him cry out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me X. But although he wrested with the tentation of dereliction yet he fell not into desperation neither did he yield to the tentation but overcame it by a strong confidence in his God The undoubted argument of his victory was this That in his greatest agony he failed not to call God his God XI His externall sufferings were the tortures of his body which he endured in a manner in all his members and senses for his head was torn with thorns and beat with reeds his face was defiled with spitle and bruised with bufferings his ears were wounded with scoffs and railings his eyes were troubled with the mourning of his Mother and his disciples his tongue was scorched with thirst and poisoned with vinegar and gall his body was stript and torn with whipping and the same was fastned to the Cross his hands and feet being pierced with nails was hanged between Theeves his sinews were racked and his side was peirced with a lance XII The Crosse was chosen to die on which was no ordinary kinde of death but an accursed one for of old it was made execrable by the mouth of God Cursed is he that hangeth on a Tree Deut. 21.22 XIII * A. R. * In Christs death the Personal Union was not dissolved This is true and the reason is because the gifts of God are without repentance now the Hypostatical Vnion is the greatest of his gifts which could not be lost without sin and sin could not be in him who came to save sinners its true Christ seems to grant a dereliction when he saith My God my God why hast thou forsaken me But these words do not shew any dereliction or dissolution of the personal union in death for Christ spake them whilst he was alive they only shew that Christ was left to tread the wine-presse alone and yet he was not alone for the Father is with me saith he Christ was alone and forsaken in respect of deliverance but not alone nor forsaken in respect of the Divine presence and assistance without which he could not have performed that great work of our redemption In that the Father left him in the hands of his enemies and did not deliver him he might be said to forsake him But it may be objected that Christs soule was the medium of the union between the Divinity and Christs body This medium being gone how could the extremes cohere I answer in this union the soul was the medium of congruity not of necessity for the Divinity was united to Christs body in the Virgins womb before the soul was infused or else he could not have bin conceived by the Holy Ghost So might the Divinity be united still to the body after the soul was separated The soul indeed being aspirit was a fit medium to unite the Deity to the body but not absolutely necessary In Christs death the Personal Vnion was not dissolved the soule indeed was severed from the body but neither of them from the Personality or Hypostasis of the sonne of God XIV The sufferings that followed his death were not joyned with any pain yet they wanted not disgrace or ignominie such was his burial and the three dayes lying in the grave XV. His burial was a part of his sufferings whereby Christs body no otherwayes then the carkasses of other men was cast into the grave XVI His three dayes detention or stay in the grave is the last degree of his Humiliation at which time his soule being translated to Paradise his body was detained under the pains and bands of death as if he had been altogether overcome and swallowed up by it his enemies in the mean while triumphing over him as if he had been quite cut off Act. 2.24 Whom God raised having loosed the sorrows of death XVII When mention is made of Christs descent into Hell in the fourth Article of the Creed it is demanded of what part of Christs passion that must be understood That opinion of the Papists concerning Christs local descent into Limbus Patrum or the place of the Fathers and their delivery from thence is fabulous from which their opinion is not much different who feign that Christ entred Hell that he might triumph there as a Conquerour Both opinions are repugnant to the story of the Gospel for whereas Christ otherwayes in respect of his Deity is every where his soule being recommended into the hands of his Father by himself whilst he hung on the Crosse and his body being laid up in the grave it must needs be false that Christ did locally go down to hell Besides whereas God doth professe that he is their God after death Exo. 3.6 there can be nothing more absurd then that the soules of the Fathers should be detained in that limbus or prison Peter witnesseth 1 ep 3.19 that Christ preached to the Spirits of old that were disobedient but this is to be understood of that preaching which was before the flood by Noah being furnished or instructed for this purpose by the Spirit of Christ Neither is there any ground
for that fiction of Christs triumph in hell both because he triumphed not before his resurrection as also because heaven was the fit place of his triumph not hell Again whereas the word Shcâ—l sometime signifieth the grave and sometime Hell the place of the damned hence it is that the phrase of Christs descent into hell hath divers meanings in Scripture for either it is the same thing that is to be buried Psal 16.10 Thou wilt not leave my soule in hell Or it is the same that is to fall into extreme tortures and anguish 1 Sam. 2.6 The Lord bringeth down to hell and bringeth out Psal 8.6 The sorrowes of hell compassed me about Or else it signifieth the state of them who are oppressed and swallowed by death Ps 49.15 Like sheep they lie in hell death gnaweth upon them Isa 14.11 c. The first exposition hath no place in the fourth Article of the Creed for it is unlikely that in so brief an Epitome of Faith there should be any tautologie or that a plain speech should be declared by a darker In the second the inconvenience of a disordered narration seems to resist to wit that Christs extreme sadnesse and anguish of mind are rehearsed to be after his death But Calvin makes the matter plain shewing that the order of things and not of time is observed so that there are two members of that Article the former is of the tortures of the body the latter of the internal torments of the mind They who maintain the third exposition do chiefly urge the order of passages both because the detention of Christ in the grave is the last degree of humiliation as also because by this means the degrees of his joyful exaltation do answer the sufferings of Christ to wit his Resurrection answers his Death the Sepulture his ascension to heaven and his descending to hell the sitting at his Fathers right hand Now as this opinion is not disliked so the former is not rashly to be rejected nor should we dispute contumaciously in this matter seeing this clause of Christs descent to hell was not alwayes added to the fourth Article as the Nicene Creed and divers others do witnesse So that this may remain firm that neither his spiritual agonies in his soule nor his three dayes detention in the grave ought to be separated from his sufferings XVIII For the forme or manner of his Passion He suffered 1. Truly 2. Holily and innocently 3. Voluntarily These three things are to be well observed For if he had not truly suffered he had not satisfied if he had not suffered holily and innocently we could not have a perfect High-Priest Heb. 7.26 If lastly he had not voluntarily submitted himself his sacrifice had been compulsory not free hence he saith Heb. 10.7 Behold here I am to do thy will ô God XIX The generall end of Christs paâ—sion is the glory of God and chiefly the manifestation of his wrath against sinne as also of his justice and mercy besidâ—s the declaration of the Divine and Humane naâ—ures But the proper and special end is Satisfaction for our sinnes XX. In the end and use of every particular Passion a regard is to be had of that Analogie in which the Expiation is compared with the Sin and the Passion with the Punishment which we should have suffered For example He sustained most grievous tortures in his soul and body both that the sinnes of soul and body might be expiated as also that we might be delivered from those spiritual corporal pains which eternally we should have suffered His death upon the crosse was execrable partly that he might expiate the sins by which we deserved to be accursed partly that he might free us from that curse and damnation He was buried to testifie that our sins were buried with him and that he might sanctifie our graves in which as in prisons we were to be detained untill the horrible day of Judgement by turning them into sleeping places His three dayes detention in the grave teacheth that we had deserved that for our sins death had eternally reigned over us if his ignominious detention had not also satisfied for this punishment XXI They do annihilate the end and fruit of Christs Passion who say that he suffered onely for this that he might be an example to us 'T is true that Christ by suffering hath left us an example but the main fruit of his Passion is the satisfaction for our sins The Socinians acknowledge Christ a Saviour onely in these things 1. In that he preached celestial Truth 2. That he confirmed it 3. That he was our example in his Passion and Resurrection 4. In that at length he bestows life eternal on us But when we alleadge testimonies out of Scripture concerning Christs death for us they elude them by saying that he died for us that is for our good but not for us that is in our place or stead But this most pestilent Heresie is refuted by these subsequent Arguments 1. Because he so died for us that he gave his life as the price of redemption for many Mat. 20.28 who gave himself a ransom for all 2 Tim. 2.6 that he is said to redeem us with his pretious blood 1 Pet. 1.18 19. You are saith he redeemed Now who knows not that it is one thing to be an example of salvation and freedom and another thing to pay a ransom for any for he that satisfieth not for his slave or in his stead how doth he pay a ransom for him 2. Because he died so for us that he was made sin for us 2 Cor. 5.21 That he took our sins upon him and he bore the punishment due to our sins Isâ— 53.4 Is then the taking of anothers sin upon him and the suffering of the punishment due to another onely the shewing of an example and not to satisfie and to be punished in his stead 3. If the sacrifices of the Old Testament were offered by the Priests for the People or in their stead then Christs sacrifice also was performed in our stead the former is true therefore so is the latter They assever boldly that in Scripture there is no example where the particle for is the same that in anothers stead but who sees not this in these subsequent testimonies Joh. 10.11 The good shepherd layeth down his life for his sheep to wit by fighting even to death in the stead or place of his sheep Rom. 5.7 Scarce will one die for a just man Rom. 8.26 The Spirit maketh intercession for us and ver 13. If God be for us who can be against us and ver 9. I could wish to be accursed for my brethren Neither doth the eternity of pain due to our sins make Christs Passion an insufficient ransom in that he suffered not eternally for us because though his punishment was not eternal in regard of time yet it is equivalent to eternal pain both in respect of the infinite majestie and dignity of Christs
for us The latter branch confounds his holiness or innocency with his obedience or actual justice which differ as much as the habite and privation Innocency indeed is necessarily required in Christs Sacrifice but his actual obedience is not onely required in Christ as a Priest but it is also a part of his satisfaction and merit for if Adams actual disobedience was the meritorious cause of damnation why should not the actual obedience of the second Adam be the meritorious cause of salvation except we will say that the first Adam was more powerful to damn us then the second was to save us II. The Fathers command which Christ obeyed was special and general Special in respect of the end that he should obey not for himself but for us But general in respect of the object for he was subject to the same Law which was prescribed to us and in all things which the Law enjoyned us to They who only make Christs passive obedience meritorious pretend that it was performed so onely by a special command from the Father that he should die for us But this were not a special command only but a partial For Christs obedience doth as far extend it self as the Law doth Whereas then the Law obligeth us both to the punishment and to obedience he did satisfie both these requisites III. Life eternal is considered either in it self as it is a full participation of celestial joy or in opposition to damnation as it is a freedom from damnation in the former sense the perfect Justice of Christ is the cause of eternal life but in the latter the suffering of the punishment is the cause of life eternal It is one thing to describe Life eternal privatively and another thing positively To speak properly there is no other cause of eternal Life but perfect Justice according to the Law Do this and live Yet Christs death is called the cause of eternal Life so far as it is a delivery from all evil neither is freedom from damnation and heavenly joys parts of life but onely different relations Hence it is apparent in what sense Christ promiseth that he will give his flesh for the life of the world Joh. 6.51 Two things here are objected 1. If Christs active obedience is the cause of eternal Life then he suffered in vain 2. If Christ obeyed for us then we need not yield obedience But in the first Argument there is no consequence for there is one end which is common to both parts of satisfaction to wit our salvation another proper to each one for the end of his suffering was our delivery from evil but the end of Justice is the procuring of right to eternal life The latter Argument against the merit of active obedience is such a one as Socinus frames against the merit of passive obedience If quoth he Christ died in our stead then we need not die But there is no consequence in either there is one death of Christ another of the godly that was joyned with a curse this with a blessing Christ did undergo that as the wages of our sins but we undergo this as a passage from this life to a heavenly so there is one obedience of Christ another of man that was perfect Justice which he performed in our stead to purchase life for us but this is imperfect and is performed to shew our gratitude for our redemption IV. The active Justice of Christ in the Old Testament was shadowed out by the glorious robes of the High-Priest as a type They who deny the merit of active obedience ask By what type it was shadowed out For if say they it is a part of the Priests office in what thing did the High-Priest type it out But to what purpose was all that glorious attiring of the High-Priest in which he appeared before God if it was not to shadow out Christs righteousness Hence we read that not only were the filthy garments of Jehosuah taken off from him in signe of our sins removed from us but that new garments were put upon him and a mitre or crown set upon his head Zach. 3.4 5. So much of Christs Satisfaction His Intercession in the state of Humiliation was whereby he offered Supplications and Prayers not without tears and groans to his Father for us The Evangelical storie tels us of whole nights that Christ spent in prayer but he performed this office chiefly in the time of his Passion Joh 17. Heb. 7.5 Who in the days of his flesh offered with strong cries and tears supplications and prayers to him who was able to deliver him from death The RULES I. They annihilate Christs Incarnation who seek other Mediators of Intercession as they call them besides him The Pontificians distinguish between the Mediator of Redemption and mediators of Intercession and this latter office they ascribe to the departed Saints but it is no lesse sacriledge to ascribe his Intercession to the secondary Intercessors then to impart his Sacrifice to subordinate Priests and whereas they feigne that the Saints profit us not by their Intercession onely but by their merits also their distinction fals to the ground seeing they divide the glory also of Redemption between Christ and the Saints while they seâ—gn that by their merits as it were by an auxiliary aid our sins are purged and the defect of Christs passion supplied Hitherto of his Priestly office His Regal office he administred in the state of his Humiliation in gathering together a Church by his Word and Spirit so that in it there appeared no signe of Regal Majestie The RULE I. In vain do the Jews dream of the Messiah's earthly Kingdom Isa 42.2 He shall not cry nor lift up nor cause his voice to be heard in the streets Isa 53.2 3. But he shall grow up as a branch and as a root out of a dry ground he hath neither form nor beauty when we shall see him there shall be no form that we should desire him he is despised and rejected of men he is a man full of sorrows and hath experience of infirmities we hid as it were our faces from him he was despised and we esteemed him not Zach. 9.9 Behold thy King cometh unto thee he is just and saved himself poor and riding upon an asse CHAP. XIX Of Christs Exaltation THus of the state of his Humiliation the state of his Exaltation is that wherein Christ being raised from the dead was exalted to Heaven and being set down at his Fathers right hand was crowned with the highest degree of glory The RULES I. The efficient cause of this Exaltation was the whole Trinity II. But Christ considered according to dispensation is the object thereof III. The exaltation of Christs person was according to both natures IV. According to his humane nature he was exalted by laying aside the infirmities which he assumed and by obtaining those gifts which before he wanted For he attained as great a perfection both in his body and soul as
the creature was capable of V. He was exalted according to his divine nature not by accession of any dignity to it being considered in it self but by the manifestation of that majesty which before was hid under the form of a servant VI. * A. R. It is said here that Christ obtained his exaltation by his obedience nor by the way of merit It is true that Christ as God cannot merit Nor 2. did he merit the grace of union as man for that was infinitely more then man or Angels could merit Nor 3. did he merit by the act of free-will in his conception that plenitude of grace and knowledge which was infused into him Nor 4. did he merit any thing which was not due to him in respect of the Personal union Yet we may not deny but that he merited whatsoever honour was conferred on him before his death and likewise his exaltation after his resurrection for so the Apostle sheweth that because Christ humbled himself and because obedient to the death of the crosse therefore God exalted him Phil. 2.9 10 11. He shall drink of the brook in the way therefore shal he lift up his head Ps 110. Therefore S. Austin in Joh. tract 104. cals Christs humility the merit of his glory and his glory the reward of his humility This glory then was Christs due both in respect of the personal union and also in respect of merit for why may not a thing be due in a double respect Christ attained to this exaltation by his obedience not as it were by merit but as it were by the means or way VII The end hereof was to witnesse that he faithfully performed the office enjoyned him in his humiliation and to manifest his divine power by which he doth powerfully apply his merit to us The parts or degrees of this are three His Resurrection his Ascension to heaven and his Sitting at the Fathers right hand His resurrection was the first degree of exaltation by which Christ having overcome the power of death was raised the third day in that very flesh which he had laid down that he might live to God for ever The RULES I. Christ was not only the object but also the efficient cause of his resurrection Rom. 1.4 Being declared with power to be the Son of God according to the Spirit of sanctification by the resurrection from the dead 1 Pet. 3.18 He died concerning the flesh but was quickned in the Spirit II. The matter of the Resurrection is the same body that was crucified but endowed and glorified with new qualities III. Neither was it so changed as to lose its quantity and three dimensions For otherwise it had been no body nor had Christ remained man in his Resurrection IV. The Forme consisteth in a new and indivisible union of soul and body V. Although Christs Resurrection was altogether miraculous yet it is false that his body passed through the stone which covered the grave or that it passed through the door after his Resurrection Mat. 28.2 The Angel of the Lord rolled away the stone Joh. 20.19 The doors being shut not through the doors that were shut VI. The end of his Resurrection besides that general end which was mentioned before is the assurance of our Resurrection both from the death of sin as also from death corporal Rom. 6.1 2. 1 Cor. 15.12 c. His ascension to Heaven was the second degree of his Exaltation in which Christ after he had conversed fourty days with his Disciples upon earth ascended into heaven The RULES I. Christ ascended both according to his divine and humane natures according to his humane at the object according to his divine as the efficient cause II. The Forme consisteth in Christs real and local translation from this world to the highest heaven III. Here we need not trouble our selves about penetration of bodies both because heaven is not a solid thick or iron body as the Philosophers would have it as also because one body can easily yield to another and the creature to the Creator IV. The doctrine of Christs corporal presence here on earth doth utterly overthrow that of his Ascension V. The special end of Christs ascension is to assure us of our threefold ascension the first is of faith and godlinesse in this life the second of our souls in death the third of body and soul in the last day The sitting of Christ at his Fathers right hand is the highest degree of his Exaltation by which being placed in heaven he is exalted above all power Eph. 1.20.21.22 He hath set him at his right hand in the heavenly places far above all principalities and power and might and dominion and every name that is named not in this world onely but in that also which is to come and hath made all things subject under his feet and hath appointed him over all things to be the head to his Church which is his body and the fulness of him that filleth all in all things The RULES I. To sit at Gods right hand is to have the next power after God After the manner of Kings who use to set them on their right hands to whom they will give the chief honour next to themselves Psal 45.10 The queen is at thy right hand 1 King 2.19 When Bathsheba came to Solomon to speak unto him for Adonijah the king rose to meet her and bowed himself to her and sat down on his throne and he caused a seat to be set for the Kings mother and she sate at his right hand Mat. 20.21 command that my two sons may sit the one at thy right hand the other at thy left in thy Kingdom II. Christ according to both Natures sits at Gods right hand III. The Humanity was so exalted that yet it was not made equal to the Divinity he received glory above all creatures yet not equal to that essential glory which he hath in common with the Father and the Holy Ghost In this highest degree of Exaltation Christ hath not left to do his office He performed his Prophetical office by furnishing his Ministers with gifts of old extraordinarily but now by ordinary means propagating his Gospel through all the world with most happy successe Ephes 4.11 Some he gave to be Apostles c. His Priestly office he exerciseth not in offering himself again or in casting himself with cries and sighs at his Fathers knees but in appearing before his Father for us with the merits of his most full satisfaction and in applying the same effectually to us Psal 110.4 The Lord hath sworn and will not repent thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedek Heb. 9.24 He hath not entred into the Sanctuary made with hands which are similitudes of the true Sanctuary but is entred into the very heaven to appear now in the sight of God for us Lastly He useth his Kingly office not onely by ruling the Triumphant Church but also by gathering together the Militant Church
ye should be wise in your own conceit that blindness in part is happened to Israel until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in and so all Israel shall be saved The Apostles scope in this is to dehort Christians from insulting over the Jews that are rejected because they themselves are called The reason is because by their ruine the Gentiles have received salvation ver 11. Yet so that all hope of reconciliation is not cut off from the Jews ver 15. Nor are they exempted from being rejected who being Christians onely in name are puffed up in their mindes ver 20 21. That former passage of the rejection of the Jews which was not altogether without hope of pardon doth shew in a mysterie that the Jews were not totally but in part only rejected not in respect of time for it was to last onely a while but in respect of that part of the Jewish Nation which contains the Reprobates so that the meaning is this blindness hath hapned not to all the Jews but to a part onely that is to the reprobates Neither have these words untill the fulness of the Gentiles come in this meaning that there shall be such a plausible calling of the Jews after the fulness of the Gentiles is come in For there is nothing more usual then that these particles untill or till being denyed or affirmed signifie the same that never or always As we shewed above c. 19. Neither doth that which the Apostle subjoyns v. 26. hinder any thing this interpretaton And so all Israel shall be saved For by the name of all Israel he understands the Elect which indeed are the true Israelites as above c. 9.7 c. he sheweth And also in the following places v. 28 c. 11. he explains saying As concerning the Gospel they are enemies for your sakes but as touching the Election they are beloved for their fathers sakes The summe of the whole place is this The rejection of the Jewes nation in part whereby blindnesse shall remain upon the reprobate doth no wayes prejudice the elect of that same nation but they also and so all Israel shall be saved See Calvin on this place VII The signe of Christs presence shall be doubtless an incredible brightness and majestie in which he shall appear For he shall come in the clouds of heaven Mat. 26.64 with incredible glory Mat. 25.31 accompanied with the whole army of his Angels ibid. with a great shout and voice of the Archangel 1 Thess 4.16 By reason of his brightness the Sun and Moon shall be darkned as lesser lights by the greater and stars shall fall from heaven that is they shall seem to fall from heaven and the powers of heaven shall be shaken Mat. 24.29 yea at his sight heaven and earth shall seem to flie away Rev. 20.11 Thus of Christs coming The resurrection of the dead is whereby the bodies of the dead shall be raised but the bodies of those that remain alive shall be changed and shall be again united to their souls by an indissoluble union The RULES I. The Resurrection called by the Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is First or Second That is a resuscitation from the death of sinne to the life of righteousnesse This is a revocation from death corporal to life Rev. 20.6 Blessed is he who hath part in the first resurrection II. The Scripture proves the Resurrection of the dead by testimonies a examples b types c and reasons d a Iob 19.25 26. Dan. 12.2 Hos 13.14 Mat. 22.31 c. 27.52 Ioh. 5.26 27 28. Phil. 3.21 1 Thess 4. and other such like places b The example of those that were raised by the ministery of Eliah 1 King 17.22 Elisha 2 King 4.34 2 King 13.21 by Christ also Mat. 9.25 Luc. 7.14 Ioh. 11.11 Mat. 27.52 53. and by the Apostles Act. 9.40 20.10 c The type of Aarons Rod budding Num. 17. of the Jews returning from Babylon Ezek. 37. but chiefly of Henoch and Elias Gen. 5. 2 King 2. d Reasons are drawn from the covenant of God which is not broken by death Mat. 22.30 from the promises of life eternal from the Sacraments which are seals thereof which 1 Cor. 15. are set down at large but the chief reason is drawn from Christ who is not only the type and example of our resurrection but the beginning also thereof for from the life of the Head we undoubtedly gather the life of the mystical body III. Though the Resurrection of the dead is above nature and mans corrupt reason yet it is neither against nature nor against right reason For right reason teacheth that the dead can be raised and shall be raised That is gathered from his omnipotence this from his justice For as it is just that some sins be punished after this life so it is just likewise that what was the companion of sin should be the companion of pain IV. The generall efficient cause of the Resurrection is the whole Trinity the particular is Christ our Lord. Christ is the efficient cause of this three wayes 1. As God 2. As the Judge of the world 3. As Mediator The first two wayes he is the efficient cause of resurrection both in the elect and reprobate but the third way he is the cause of the resurrection of the faithful by his merit efficacie and inchoation V. The matter is the same numerical body that man had in this life Besides Iobs testimony Iob 19.26 the reason annexed to the third Canon taken from Gods justice proves this VI. The form consisteth in the reunion of body and soul and restoring of the dead to life and in the sudden change of those that remain and in their freedome from corruption 1 Cor. 15.51 VII The end is the declaration of Gods justice and mercy of that in raising the wicked to condemnation of this in raising the godly to life eternal Dan. 12.2 Joh. 5.28.29 VIII In the Resurrection the godly shall be freed not only from corruption and bodily defects but shall be crowned also with glory 1 Cor. 15.42 43 44. It is sowed in corruption it is raised in incorruption it is sowed in dishonour it is raised in glory it is sowed in weaknesse it is raised in power it is sowed a natural body it is raised a spiritual body CHAP. XXXV Of the last Judgement SO much of the antecedents of the last Judgment The Judgment it self is that most glorious act whereby Christ shall judge the whole world The RULES I. The certainty of the last Judgment is proved by the same arguments by which we proved the certainty of Christs coming and of our resurrection II. The general efficient principal cause is the whole Trinity the particular is Christ our Lord in the assumed humane nature but glorified III. The chiefe power of Judicature shall be in Christ for to him all power is given and from whom no appeal can be made to any superiour IV. This Judge shall be
latter rank is of those Petitions which concern our needs as well for this as for the next life For the present belongs the 4. Petition Give us this day our daily bread For the future the two latter And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive them that trespasse against us And lead us not into tentation but deliver us from evil That hath reference to the gift of justification this of sanctification The Confirmation fellows in these words For thine is the kingdom the power and the glory for ever and ever By which we are taught 1. that God likes our Prayers because he is our King for His is the Kingdome 2. That he can hear us for His is the Power 3. That he will hear us for His is the Glory 4. That his love towards us is unchangeable for he is so for ever and ever The Conclusion is in the particle Amen by which we witnesse that we have prayed seriously and with confidence to be heard V. The end of Prayer is Gods glory and our salvation For this is the Alpha and Omega of Prayer hence the Petitions of the Lords Prayer begin with Gods glory and end in our salvation VI. Great are the effects of Prayer not as if there were merit in it for the work wrought the force is in Gods promise rather then in the prayer VII The Object to which Prayer is directed is the whole Trinity yet so that all the Persons conjunctly or either of them severally is called upon That the Father is to be called upon is not doubted The Son is called upon by Stephen Act. 7.59 yea all the Angels worship him Heb. 1.6 The Holy Ghost is called upon with the Father and Son by John Rev. 1.4 5. And that Angelical hymne Holy holy holy c. is applied to the Sonne Joh. 12.41 and to the Holy Ghost Act. 11.26 27. VIII The object for which we pray are the living not the dead and such as sinne but not to death For God will not be intreated for those who sinne unto death 1 Joh. 5.16 For the dead we must not pray because they are either damned or blessed if damned our prayers are fruitlesse if blessed needlesse IX The object against which we pray are Gods open enemies We ought not presently to pray for their eternal destruction but we are to beseech God that with his mighty hand he would humble and convert them otherwise eternally to plague them if they will not be converted The imprecations of the Prophets are not to be imitated by us rashly for it is hard to discern those who sinne to death and those of whom we have good hope X. Prayers should be joyned with an humble confession of our sins with a true and firm confidence and a constant purpose of repentance XI External gestures decently used availe much both to excite and to testifie the devotion of our souls So much of the parts and of that forme whereby God will be worshipped of us the outward helps follow whereof be Fastings and Vows Fasting is an abstinence from meat and drink undertaken for a time that the lasciviousnes of the flesh may be subdued and God with the greater fervencie may be called upon The RULES I. Fasting is either forced or voluntary That is the poore mans for want of meat this of them who want not meat The voluntary Fast is either Natural Civil or Ecclesiastical Natural is that which is undertaken for healths sake the Civil is that which is enjoyned by the Magistrate in some publique affairs Ecclesiastical is that we defined II. Ecclesiastical fasting is private or publique III. Private is that which one enjoyns to himself or his family for some private causes Examples are Job 1.12 2 Sam. 3.36 and 12.16 Nehem. 1.4 IV. Publique is that which is commanded by the Magistrate or the Church for some publique causes especially when calamities are at hand Examples 2 Chron. 20. Hest 4. V. In a true Fast the manner and end are to be considered VI. For the manner true fasting consisteth not in choice of meats but in abstinence from all meats 2. Not in external abstinence from meat but in abstinence from sin Isa 58.6 c. Joel 2.12 VII There ought to be no other end of Fasting but onely to give our selves more earnestly to prayer and divine worship to beat down the lasciviousnesse of the flesh to witnesse our humility before God and our repentance before our neighbour VIII Fasting is not tied to certain times as in the Old Testament but ought to be undertaken freely upon urgent causes and necessity So much for Fasting A Vow is a promise made in a holy manner to God of things lawful to witnesse our readinesse to serve God The RULES I. A Vow in this place signifieth a religious Promise not prayers or desires II. A Vow is either general or particular That is of things commanded and is required of all men such is the Vow of Baptisme this is of things lawful and is undertaken for some private cause that is a part of divine Worship this is onely a help thereto III. A particular Vow is considered in its efficient matter forme and end IV. For the efficient they are excluded from making a vow who want as yet the use of judgement and reason 2. Who are not masters of themselves but are subject either to Parents or Husbands Numb 6. V. The matter of a Vow is a thing lawful and in our power VI. The forme consisteth in the deliberation of the minde in purpose of the will and in the promise either internal or external also VII The end is to testifie thankefulnesse of minde or to exercise some private discipline A Vow of the first kind is when one that hath escaped a sicknesse or danger doth consecrate to God something by Vow as a token of his gratitude A Vow of the latter sort is when one by Vow abstains from something in it self lawful yet dangerous to him as Wine c. VIII The subject to whom we ought to Vow is God onely IX A Vow before it is made is arbitrary but being lawfully made it is to be kept Psal 76.12 Vow and pay unto the Lord your God Hitherto of the true manner of worshipping God to which are contrary the intermission of it and false worship And this is threefold in respect of the object for either it is not commanded by God or else it is expresly prohibited by him or being commanded is directed to some other end The manner of worshipping God not commanded is called Wil-worship to wit a worship devised by mans brain Paul opposeth this kinde of worshipping God to Christian Liberty Col. 2.20 21 22 23. Therefore if you be dead with Christ you are freed from the rudiments of this world Why as though living in the world are you subject to ordinances touch not taste not handle not which all are to perish with using after the commandments and doctrines of men which things have indeed
is a sensitive creature but the latter as he is man But by Philosophers it is taken more strictly so that they reduce the inferior appetites to the concupiscible faculty but the affections to the irascible Ordered appetites are whereby man desires meat drink rest sleep and such like moderately and to the end appointed by God 1 Tim. 5.23 Drink no longer water but use a little wine for thy stomacks sake and often infirmities To this is opposite Inordinate appetite whereby more is desired then nature or Gods ordination do require or for another end then that to which God hath ordained natural things lawful Rom. 13.13 Not in surfeting and drunkennesse not in chambering and wantonnesse The chief affections are Love Hatred Joy Sadnesse Hope Fear and Anger Ordered Love is whereby we sincerely love our neighbour and desire the things that be good fair and of good report Rom. 12.9 Let love be without dissimulation abhor that which is evil cleave to that which is good Phil. 4.8 Whatsoever things are true whatsoever things are lovely whatsoever things are of good report if there be any vertue and if there be any praise thinke on these things To this is opposite the too much love of our neighbour a selfe-love b impure love c and the love of this world d a 1 Sam. 2.29 Thou hast honoured thy sonnes above me b 2 Tim. 3.2 Men will be lovers of themselves c Prov. 6.25 Desire not her beauty neither let her eye-lids intice thee d 1 Joh. 2.15 Love not the world c. And v. 16. Because whatsoever is in the world the lust of the flesh the lust of the eyes and the pride of life is not of the Father but of the world Ordered hatred is whereby we onely hate those who hate God a in other men and in our selves we hate not the person but by all meanes we hate and avoid the sinne b a Psal 139.21 Do not I hate them O Lord that hate thee b Mat. 18.15 If thy brother offend thee reprove him between thee and him alone c. Rom. 7.19 For I do not the good which I would but the evil which I would not do that do I To this is opposite the unjust hatred of our neighbour a and the hatred of good men b a 1 Joh. 3.15 Whosoever hateth his brother as a murtherer b Psal 41.5 My enimies said of me when shall he die c. Ordered joy is whereby man rejoyceth moderately for his own prosperity a and heartily for his neighbours felicity b a Psal 30.12 Thou hast turned my mourning into joy b Rom. 12.15 Rejoyce with them that rejoyce To this is opposite carnal and immoderate joy a also rejoycing at our neighbours misfortunes b a Luke 6.25 Woe to you that now laugh for you shall weepe and mourne b Prov. 24.17 Rejoyce not at thy enemies fall Ordered sadnesse or sorrow is whereby we moderately bemoane our own afflictions a and heartily condole our neighbours calamities b a Jam. 5.13 If any amongst you be afflicted let him pray b Rom. 12.15 Mourne with those that mourne To this immoderate sadnesse is opposite a sadnesse also for our neighbours prosperity b and too much sadnesse when wicked men are punished c a Prov. 17.22 A merry heart doth good like a medicine but a broken Spirit dryeth the bones b Mat. 20.15 Is thine eye evil because I am good c 1 Sam. 16.1 How long wilt thou mourn for Saul seeing I have rejected him Ordered hope is whereby we expect better things for our selves and by the law of charity also for our neighbours Of hope as it is a vertue we have spoken before 1 Cor. 13.7 Love suffereth all things believeth all things hopeth all things To this is opposite disordered hope when we place more trust in our selves and neighbours then is fit Jer. 17.5 Cursed is he that putteth his trust in man Ordered fear is whereby we walk carefully neither trusting too much our selves nor others Prov. 14.8 The wisdome of the prudent is to understand his way To this is opposite disordered feare whereby man feares himselfe and others too much Mat. 10.28 Feare not them that can kill the body c. Ordered anger is whereby we are offended ordispleased with our selves and others upon just cause yet moderately and with hope of amending Eph. 4.26 Be angry but slane not To this is opposite inordinate anger whereby we are incensed upon light causes or more then is fit or when we intend private revenge Jam. 1.20 For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousnesse of God So much of the ordering of concupiscence Wrestling against tentations and the assaults of an evil conscience is whereby a Christian man denies an evil conscience crucifying his flesh with the lusts thereof and against the assaults of the flesh the devil and the world watcheth and stoutly fighteth There are many reasons that induce us to wrestle stoutly 1. Because the Scripture forbids evil desires and lusts Pro. 6.25 1 Cor. 10.6 Gal. 5.6 26. Col. 3.5 1. 1 Thes 4.5 2. Because he that is given to lusts loves not God 1 Joh. 2.15 16. 3. Because lusts in regenerate men are hateful Gal. 5.16 17. 4. Because they inconse God to anger Col. 3.5 6. 5. Because the Apostle furnisheth us with the whole armour of God against them Eph. 6. Invisible lusts are overcome by us saith Austin 6. Because the fire of lusts is most hurtful and breaks out into most sad events the Scripture is full of examples there was never yet any sin committed which did not spring from evil lust To this is opposite carnal security whereby man flatters his own flesh whereby he willingly entertaineth lusts whereby he gives himself to idlenesse or sloth which is the devils cushion whereby he omits holy exercises whereby he burdens his soule with intemperance covetousnesse and such like Vices There are three degrees of our wrestling against lusts to wit against suggestion delight and assent To understand these degrees that of James helps c. 1. 14 c. Every man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust and enticed then when lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne and sinne when it is finished bringeth forth death We must then first resist suggestions and thoughts which are either ascending from the fewel of concupiscence or descending being suggested elsewhere the first are not without sinne the latter are not sinnes being cast in by Satan if so be we let them passe and entertain them not We cannot avoid the first degree let us shun the second lest we come to cherish evil thoughts with delight but we must chiefly beware of the third degree that we give not our assent for the more we obey the sinne of concupiscence the more it increaseth Which that we may more and more avoid we beseech God the Father in his Sonne through the Holy Ghost to which one God in Trinity be praise honour and glory for ever and ever Amen FINIS A TABLE