the King by the Charter of the 11 of E. 3. or by Act of Parliament confirming that Charter was because there were divers priviledges granted him which could not possibly be granted by Charter but must of necessity be by Act of Parliament Vide. pl. ibid. Melius inquiâ—â—d 18. A Melius Inquirendum to find what Land I. S. held of King James at the time of his death Co. l. 8. 168. a. 4. in Paris Sloughters case being in the 40 year of Queen Eliz. shall be quasht for the impossibility thereof for it is impossible that I. S. should hold any Land of King James in the 40 yeare of Queen Eliz. he being then King of Scotland 156. Non cogit ad Impossibilia Impotentia excusat Legem Shewing a Deed. 1. If a Deed remaine in one Court it may be pleaded in another Court without shewing it forth Co. Inst pars 1. 231. b. 4. because he cannot have it out of the other Court and Lex non cogit ad impossibilia vide Co. l. 5. 74. b. 4. in Wymarks case Claime 2. Regularly Litt. S. 434. Co. ibid. 258. a. 3. where a man doth lesse then the commandment or authority committed to him there the commandment or authority being not pursued the Act is void and where a man doth that which he is authorized to doe and more there it is good for that which is warranted and void for the rest yet both these rules have divers exceptions and amongst the rest this for one that if a man be sick that he cannot go to the Land nor any part thereof to make his claime and he commands his Servant to do it and the Servant dare not go to the Land for feare of some bodily hurt in this case if the Servant go as neere the Land as he dare and there make claime for his Master that shall suffice albeit his Master bade him go to the Land because Impotentia excusat legem for seeing the Master cannot and the Servant dare not enter into the Land it sufficeth that he come as neere the Land as he dare Descent 3. Descent shall not take away Entry of a man in Prison at the time of the Descent cast because he could not make continuall claime Litt. S. 436. Co. ibid. 259. a. 2. when he was in Prison being there kept as it is presumed in Law in salva arcta custodia without intelligence of things abroad Descent 4. A Descent cast during the vacation of an Abbey Litt. S. 443. Co. ibid. 263. b. 2 shall not take away the Entry of the next Successor because seeing by the death of the Abbot which is the Act of God no person is able to make continuall claime therefore a Descent during that time shall not prejudice the Successor for Impotentia excusat legem Co. l. 5. 22. a. 3. in Laughters case 5. Where the Condition of an obligation is in the disjunctive Condition disjunctive viz. for the Obligor either to do one thing or another and both the things possible at the time of the delivery and afterwards one of them becomes impossible by the Act of God in this case the Obligor is not bound to perform the other for Impotentia excusat legem Co. l. 5. 115. a. 3. in Wades case 6. If a man be bound to pay 40000 l. at such a day Tender of money if he tender it in baggs it is sufficient for it is not possible it should be numbred within the compasse of one day Co. l. 6. 21. b. in Butler and Goodalls case 7. Lawfull Imprisonment without Covin Non-residence the want of a Parsonage House and sicknesse without fraud when the Incumbent by the advice of his Phisitian removes for better aire or the like are good excuses for non-residence against the statute of 21 H. 8. cap. Co. l. 8. 172. Hales case 8. If the Heire holding of the King by Knights Service tender his Livery that includes tender of Homage Tender of Livery and therefore after such tender he may sell any part of his Land and if he dye after tender and before Livery sued out the King shall not have the profits of his Lands longer then to the time of the Tender because by his death which is the Act of God the shewing out of his Livery is become impossible and Impotentia excusat legem Co. l. 3. 73. a. 1. in Doctor Husseyes case 9. A Feme Covert is not within the Statute of Westminst 2. cap. 39. Ravishment of Gard VV. 2. c. 39. concerning Ravishment of Ward for the Law that disables her to have any thing wherewithall to satisfie the value of the Marriage doth also free her from the punishment of Banishment and Imprisonment because it is impossible she should satisfie it when she hath nothing to do it withall for Lex non cogit ad impossibilia c. vide Max. 34. Co. l. 10. 139. b. 3. in Knightlies case 10. If a man be bound to repaire a Wall against the flowing of the Sea if it fall into decay by his default and negligence Wast a wall of the sea he shall be solely charged with the repaire thereof but if it be overthrown or endamaged by the violence of the water without his fault by the Stat. of 23 H. 8. they are to be equally charged who have losse by it for Impotentia excusat Legem vide Pl. ibid. 157. It disfavoureth Falshood Fraud and Covin Vide Dyer 294. 8. Co. Inst p. 1. 17. b. 3. 1. A man hath as absolute ownership and property in an Advowson Advowson how pleaded as he hath in Lands or Rents yet he shall not plead that he is seised thereof In Dominico ut feodo because that Inheritance savouring not De domo cannot either serve for the sustentation of him or his Houshold neither can any thing be received for the same for defraying of charges and therefore he cannot say that he is seised thereof In Dominico suo de feodo Whereby it appeareth how the Common Law doth detest Symmony and all corrupt Bargaines for Presentation to any Benefice but that Idonea persona for the discharge of the cure should be presented freely without Expectation of any thing nay the Common Law is so cautelous in this point that the Plaintiff in a Quare Impedit should recover no Damages for the losse of his Presentation untill the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 5. And that is the reason that Guardian in Soccage shall not present to an Advowson because he can take nothing for it whereof to make Account for by the Law he can meddle with nothing that he cannot account for So in a Writ of Right of Advowson the Patron shall not alledge the Explees in himselfe but in the Incumbent For which Reasons of an Advowson a man shall plead that he is seised De advocatione ut de feodo jure
if they be distrained to come to them they may have a writ out of the Chancery for their discharge All other clerks also within orders though not beneficed have the like priviledge And the reason of this is to the end they should attend their function Co. l. 11. 70. b. in Madg. Col. case M. 10 H. 6. 8. 3 I. S. brings an action of debt against I. Rector of T. in com B. the defendant saith A Parson ought to be resident that before the day of the writ purchased he dwelt at B. in com N. Et non allocatur for a Parson shall be intended by Law to be alwayes resident upon his benefice for the cure of souls which he hath there and the Parson who hath cure of souls and is a non-resident non est dispensator sed dissipator non speculator sed spiculator And therefore no such thing shall be presumed F. N. Br 175. 4 A Parson to the end he may give his continual attendance upon that sacred function is fréed from all personal charges The like that may hinder him in his calling And therefore he shall not be chosen Bailiffe Réeve Beadle or other officer for land annexed to his Church And all this by the course of the Common Law F. N. Br. 34. l. for the same reason it is that if a Parson have a Parsonage and after take another benefice without a dispensation the first benefice is void and the Patron thereof may present for this avoydance is called a Cession because the taking of the last makes him neglect the first F. N. Br. 175. Br. Dismes 16 5 To the end that Religion may not be neglected Tithes due onely to the Parson of common right but preserved and daily increased the Common Law giveth to the Parson of common right the tenth of all manner of yearely encrease which are called Dismes or Tithes the due payment whereof tendeth much to the continuance and establishment of the true Religion and the due worship of God Co. l. 2. 44. b. The Bishop of Winchesters case And therefore albeit a meere lay man may prescribe in modo decimandi yet he cannot so doe in non decimando because he is but in special cases capable of tithes at the Common Law and therefore without special matter shewed it shall not be intended that he hath any lawful discharge And for this cause in favour of holy Church although it may have lawfull commencement the law will not suffer such prescription in that case nor put it to the trial of lay men who will perhaps rather strain their consciences for their private benefit that give the Church the duties that belong to her Vide infra 186. 11. Co. l. 5. 63. a. 44 E. 3. 19. 6 The Inhabitants of a Town without any custome may make ordinances or by-laws for reparation of the Church By-Lawes and in that case the greater part shall bind all the rest without any Custom The Chamberlain of Londons case Prisot 3 To such Lawes as have warrant in holy Scripture our Law giveth credence contra Co. Inst pars 1 128. b. 1 In the raigne of King Alfred Outlawed persons had capita Lupina and untill a good while after the Conquest no man could have been out-lawed but for felonie and then the out-lawed person was said to have Caput Lupinum because he might be put to death by any man as a Wolfe that hateful beast might and in ancient time the head of either of them being brought to the chiefe place of the County or Franchise where they were killed the partie so killing them was to have a Mark for his paines Howbeit in the beginning of the raigne of E. 3. it was resolved by the Iudges for avoiding of inhumanitie and effusion of Christian bloud that it should not be lawfull for any man but the Sheriffe only and that upon lawfull warrant to put to death any out-lawed person though it were for felonie in pain to suffer death as in case of killing another man One attainted of a Praemunire 2 It was lawfull for any man to put to death a man attainted of a Praemunire because he was also without the Kings protection Co. ibid. 129. b and therefore subject to be destroyed as the Kings enemy but this was taken away by the wisedome of Queen Eliz. and her Parliament 5 El. 1. as a libertie not becoming a Christian Common-wealth Lepers 3 The Law of England for removing of Lepers by the writ de leproso amovendo from the societie of men to some solitarie place is grounded upon the law of God Levit. 13.44 45 46. Numb 5.1 2. Co. ibid. 135. b 4 In Cholmeleys case in the 2 Rep. fol. 51. Co. l. 11. 70. b. in Magdel Colledge case where a reversion expectant upon an estate in taile was granted to one for the life of the tenant in taile A Monkish life condemned it was said that by possibilitie this grant for life may take effect for tenant in taile having no issue may become a Monk and enter into religion and then the grantée may have it during his naturall life but it was there resolved that such superstitious and irreligious profession shall not be presumed in law A Law against Charity void 5 If a Statute be made directly against the Law of God Doct. Stud. l. 1. cap. 6. as if it should be ordained that none should give Almes to any in what necessitie soever he were or the like such Statute ought to be adjudged void 6 Such Canons Constitutions Ordinances Co. l. 5. part 1. 32. b. in the case of the Kings Ecclesiastical Law and Synodals provincial Ecclesiastical Laws as have béen allowed by general consent and custome within the Realme and are not contrariant or repugnant to the Lawes Statutes and Customes of the Realme nor to the damage or hurt of the Kings Prerogative royall are still in force within this Realme as the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes of the same 4 The Jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Law ought to be bounded by the Common Law Spiritual Laws 1 The Spiritual Laws mentioned in Littleton Sect. 648 are such Ecclesiasticall Lawes as are allowed by the Laws of this Realme Co. Inst pars 1 344. a. Co. l. 5. pars 1. 32. b. Jurisdiction Stat. 35 H. 8. 19 33 H. 6. 34. 32 H. 6. â—8 viz. which are not against the Common Law whereof the Kings prerogative is a principal part nor against the statutes or customes of the Realme Prerogative and regularly according to such ecclesiasticall Lawes the Ordinarie and other Ecclesiastical Iudges do procéed in causes within their Conisance and this Iurisdiction was so bounded by the Ancient Common Lawes of the Realme and so declared by Act of Parliament 5 Dies Dominicus non est juridicus The Lords day 1 In all the four terms the Lords day is not Dies
such a Husband as would commit Waste But if a stranger commit the Waste without the consent of the Baron that is no Forfeiture because it cannot be then imputed to her folly Co. l. 4. 50. a. 4. in Andrew Ognels case 28. When a thing is due in right and truth Exposition of that and becomes remedilesse by no default in the party to whom it is so due but by the Act of God as by the death of the party or the like In such cases Acts of Parliament which are made to give remedy in such cases ought to have a favourable construction which may extend to advance the remedy proportionably to the mischeif and defect in Law Arrearages recoverable by Executors according to the meaning of the makers thereof And therefore if a man grants a Rent-charge out of his Land and after aliens the Land to a stranger who lets it at will to another the rent is arreare and the Grantee dyes In this case the Executors of the Grantee may distrain for the arrearages by the Statute of 32 H. 8. c. 37. And that the words of that Statute are That it shall be lawfull for the Executor c. to distrain for the arrearages c. upon the Lands so long onely as they remain in the Seisin or Possession of the Tenant in Demesne who ought immediatly to have paid the Rent or of any other claiming by and from him c. Here by the words of this Statute the Executors may onely distrain the Grantor or his immediate Grantee by and from being in the Conjunctive Yet in the case above they may distraine the Tenant at will and the word and shall be taken for or to the end the Lessee at will may be understood to derive his estate from him and so to be comprehended within the purview of that Statute for the reason above alleadged Clergy Appeale 29. By the Statute of 3 H. 7. c. 1. Holcrofts case alleadged in Wrote and Wigges case Co. l. 4. 46. b. An Appeale cannot be brought against the Felon after Clergy had but by consequence before Clergy it may And yet if a Felon be indicted and upon his tryall confesses the fact and prayes Clergy and the Iudges take time and will be further advised and then an Appeale is brought In this case the act of the Court to be advised as to the allowance of the Clergy shall not prejudice the party especially in case of life there being no default in him why he had not his Clergy when he prayed it Benefice Laps 30. If a Clerke be presented admitted and instituted Co. l. 4 79. b. 3. in Digbies case to a benefice with cure above the value of 8 l. and after and before induction to the first he accepts another benefice with cure and is thereunto inducted In this case the first is void by the Statute of 21 H. 8. for the words of the Statute are If any parson having one benefice with cure c. accept and take one other c. and he that is instituted to a benefice is sayd in Law to accept and have a benefice Howbeit although by such institution to the second benefice the first is void by the ecclesiasticall Law without any deprivation or sentence declaratory yet no laps shall in this case incur against the Patron without giving notice to him F. N. B. 35. h. no more then if the Church had become void by resignation or deprivation and yet the Patron may take notice thereof if he please and may present according to the said constitution but he is not bound to take notice thereof at his perill It is otherwise if he had been inducted for then he is to take notice at his perill because the avoydance after induction is declared by act of Parliament whereunto every one is party per Popham totam Curiam Co. l. 5. 13. b. The Countess of Salops case Waste Tenant at will 31. Tenant at will shall not be charged for permissive waste for it is not in his default but in the Lessors he having an uncertaine terme Emblements sowne 32. Tenant for life Remainder in fee Co. l. 5. 85. a. In Henry Knivets case the Tenant for life lets for years the Lessee for years is ousted and the Tenant for life disseised the Disseisor lets for years and his Lessee sowes the Land the Tenant for life dyes the Remainder in fee enters the Lessee of the Disseisor carries away the graine and the Remainder in fee brings an action of Trespasse And in this case it was adjudged that because the Lessee of Tenant for life could not know the end of his terme he had right to the Land and by consequence to the graine as things annexed to the Land and albeit by the death of the Tenant for life his Interest to the Land determined yet the Land being sowen before the death of the Tenant for life his right to the emblements remaines Execution of the body not valuable 33. Vpon a Iudgement in debt Co. l. 5. 86. b. 4. c. in â—lunfeilds case after the Plaintiff hath pursued an Elegit he cannot have a Capias ad satisfaciendum against the body because he hath made his election which he cannot waive so long as the Defendant lives neither yet can he have an Elegit after the party is taken upon a Capias ad satisfaciendum returned serv'd or after the Defendant is in Prison thereupon Howbeit if in such case the party dye in Prison which is the Act of God and can do no wrong the Plaintiff may have recourse to his Elegit or take some other course untill he be satisfied for his death is not the Plaintiffs fault So if there be two bound in an Obligation joyntly and severally and the Plaintiff hath Iudgement against them both and casts them both into Prison out of which one of them escapes and so the debt as to him is discharged and the Plaintiff is to have his remedy against the Sheriff Here albeit the debt seemes to be discharged against the other also because they were joyntly bound and it was but one intire debt yet the other remaining in Prison shall not have his Audita querela but shall there continue untill the whole debt and damages be fully satisfied because corporall Imprisonment is not valuable satisfaction of the debt and it was not in the Plaintiffs default that he did escape Co. l. 5. 10. a in Spencers case 34. Vpon a Writ brought by Journeys accounts A Writ by Journeys accounts Diversity if the first Writ abated by the default of the Demandant himselfe as by his mis-information of the name of the Tenant or of the Towne c. in such case the Demandant shall not have a Writ by Journeys accounts as the Books are in 48 E. 3. 21. 14 H. 4. 23. 22 H. 6. 62. 13 H. 4. Executors 118. But if the Writ abate by the default
thereof in futuro being void at the beginning for quod ab initio non valet tractu temporis non convalescet Co. l. 2. 57. Beckwiths case 19 A Feme Inheretrix covenants by Indenture without the knowledge A void sine or consent of the Baron to acknowledge a Fine to certain Conisées and uses in the said Indenture mentioned and afterwards the Baron covenants also by Indenture without the knowledge of the Feme to acknowledge a Fine to other Conisées and uses in that Indenture also mentioned and afterwards the Baron and Feme joyne in a fine to the Conisées in the Indenture of the Feme mentioned Here the Limitations and Declarations of Vses in both the Indentures are void and the said Fine was by construction of Law to the use of the Feme and her heires as if no use at all had béen declared for the Feme alone albeit she be owner of the land yet being sub potestate viri cannot in respect of her Coverture without her Baron limit the use and on the other side the Baron who hath not any estate in his own right cannot against the good liking of the Feme limit any use because he is not owner of the land so that the one is not sui juris and hath the estate and the other is sui juris and hath not the estate And therefore when they differ in limitation all they do must needes be void A void deed or contract 20 When a Déed hath two deliveries Co. l. 3. 35. b. Jennings and Brags case in Butler and Bakers case if the person at the first delivery had power and ability in Law to contract but could not perfect it untill an impediment should be removed before the second delivery in that case the contract is good as if the Disseisée make an Indenture purporting a Lease for yeares and deliver it to a stranger out of the land as a scroul and command him to enter into the land and to deliver it upon the land as his Déed to the Lessée which is done accordingly this is a good Lease But if the person at the first delivery had not power or ability in Law to make the Lease or Contract and before the second delivery he attains to such power there the Lease or contract is not good as if at the time of the first delivery the Lessor be an Infant or Feme covert and at the time of the second delivery they become of full age or sole in both these cases the Déed doth not bind because at the time of the first delivery they were not persons that had ability in Law to make a Contract A void joynture 21 If the Baron make feofment in fée to the use of himselfe for life Co. l. 4. 2. b. 1. Vernons case and after to the use of B. for his life and after to the use of the Feme for life for her Ioynture that is not within the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. to barre the Feme of her Dower albeit B. die living the Baron So also if the estate be made to A. for life and after to the Feme for her Ioynture neither is that within the Act although A. die before the Baron for in these and the like cases in as much as at the time of the limitation of the estates they were out of the Act for that it was not then certaine that the estate of the Feme should take effect immediately after the death of the Baron as it ought to do by the said Act no subsequent event can make them within the Act For Quod ab initio non valet tractu temporis non convalescet quae malo sunt inchoata principio vix est ut bono peraguntur exitu A failer of Action 22 A. seised of the Mannor of D. in fée had communication with B. of demising the said Mannor unto him C. gives it out Co. l. 4. 18. Sir Gilbert Gerrards case that he had a Lease for 90 yeares in the Mannor whereupon B. desists from taking the Mannor by demise and thereupon A. brings an action of slander against C. And it was adjudged that those words would not beare it And in this case though it appeared by the Defendants barre that he had no title or interest in any such Lease yet because the matter alleadged in the Count did not maintaine the Action the barre could not make it good A grant of tithes not good by misnamer of the tenant 23 Q. Eliz. by Letters Patents grants to I. S. Totam illam portionem Co. l. 4. 35. 4. Bozouns case decimarum garbarum suarum in L. in Com. N. cum omnibus aliis decimis suis quibuscunque in L. in dicto Com. N. tunc vel nuper in occupatione I. C. and grants further that those Letters Patents shall be of force and effect against her selfe and her Successors Non obstante male nominando vel male recitando praedict portionem decimarum c. Et non obstante aliquibus defectis in male recitando vel non nominando alicujus tenentis sive occupatoris c. And all this was found by special verdict and besides that I. C. never had any Tithes in L. in his occupation and thereupon one question was whether the defect of mistaking the Farmer was not supplyed by the non obstante and it was resolved that it was not Because when the words of the grant are not sufficient ex vi termini to passe the thing granted but the grant is utterly void there a non obstante cannot make the grant good for when the Queen grants Totam illam portionem c. nuper in tenura I. C. here the addition of I. C. is of the substance of the grant and in as much as I. C. never had the portion in his occupation the grant must néeds be void ex vi termini and therefore the non obstante cannot make it good Co. l. 4. 62. b. 4. Herlakendens Case 24 If I let my land for life and after give the trées A void grant of trees and after the Lessée dies yet the Donée cannot take them because at the time of the grant the Lessée had the property in them as annext to the land 21 H. 6. 46. d. per totam Curiam Co. l. 4. 90. a. 3. Druries case Stat. 21. H. 8. 13. 25 If a Countesse that by the Statute may retaine two Chaplains capable of dispensations to enjoy two benefices doth first retaine two and after a third Reteiner of a Chaplain void the two first are onely capable of dispensations for they onely are her Chaplains according to the Statute and the other at the Common Law And therefore in this case if the two first die yet is not the other capable of a dispensation because at the time of his retainer he was not capable for he ought to be newly retained again to make him capable
141. a. 4. in Beamonts case 7 H. 4. fol. 16. 56 Baron and Feme being Tenants in special taile A marriage dissolved anâ— so an intaile grounded thereon are divorced viz. by such a divorce which dissolves the marriage ab inito and the Baron and Feme à vinculo matrimonii in this case they have ever after but an estate for their lives because the marriage which was the onely means whereby they might have had heirs inheritable of the estate taile being dissolved the estate taile it selfe is thereby also determined and extinct Co. l. 10. 76. a. 4. the case of the Marshalsea 57 When a Court hath jurisdiction of the cause Erroneous proceeding in Court and procéeds inversa ordine or erroneously there no action will lie either against the party that sues or against the Officer that executes the precept or processe of the Court But when the Court hath not jurisdiction of the cause there all the procéeding is coram non judice and actions will lie against them without any regard of the precept or processe c. for the rule is Judicium à non suo judice datum nullius est momenti See the booke at large Co. l. 10. 96. a. 〈◊〉 Edw. Seyâ—â—ors case 24 E. 3. 28. in Caloys case 58 Tenant in taile Dower detâ—â—mined the remainder in taile to A. the reversion in fée to himselfe bargains and sels the land to B. and his heirs Here by the déed indented and inrolled c. the Bargainée hath an estate descendable to his heirs but determinable upon the death of the Tenant in taile and hath also the reversion in fée exepctant upon the estate in remainder in taile and here likewise the Feme of the Bargainée will be endowed but in this case if the Tenant in taile die the Dower which depended upon that estate shall determine also Co. l. 10. 96. b. 1. Edw Soymors case 59 Tenant in taile Warranty dâ—termined the remainder in taile to A. the reversion in fée to himself bargains and sells the land to B. and his heirs and afterwards also levies a fine to B. his heirs with warranty c. In this case albeit A. be the next heir to the Tenant in taile yet shall not this warranty bar his remainder For every warranty ought to be knit and annexed to an estate for that a warranty hath his essence by dependancy upon some estate Now in this case at the time of the fine levyed the warranty was annexed to the Fée-simple determinable upon the death of the Tenant in taile without issue and also to the reversion in fée but doth not extend to the estate of A. in the remainder for that was not displaced nor devested but did still continue in him because A. at the time of the fine levyed and after was seised of his remainder Now then if the warranty at the time of the creation of it were annexed to an estate the Conusée by his Feoffment or other act cannot extend if farther than it was at the time of the creation of it And therefore when the estate taile unto which the warranty was annexed is determined by the death of the Tenant in taile without issue the warranty which hath his essence by dependancy is also determined because then there is no estate left to support it c. 30 E. 3. casu ultimo in Henry Pigots case Co. l. 21. 27. b. 60 In Assise before Stouffe and others in the Countrey A man unlâ—tered not bound the Tenant pleads feoffment of the Plaintiff to him by déed of the land in plea to have and to hold to him and his heirs comprehending a letter of Attorney to deliver Seisin Warranty void as welâ— the deâ—d c. and in truth the Plaintiff was a lay man not lettered and the déed with the warrant of Attorney was read unto him according to the form of an estate tail and upon the same intent he sealed and delivered the déed with the letter of Attorney in it to deliver Seisin In this case the déed did not binde the man unlettered but was adjudged void And therefore albeit the déed and the warrant of Attorney were two several clauses and that the said warrant was well and truly read unto him yet because the same warrant did depend upon the feoffment and had relation unto the estate in fee that warrant of Attorney was adjudged void also c. Warranty defeated 61 If a man enfeoffe another of land with warranty by deed F. N. B. 135. g. if the Feoffee make feoffment over and take back an estate in fee Here the estate unto which the warranty was annexed being destroyed the warranty it selfe is also destroyed and in this case he shall not have a warrantia cartae because he is in of another estate The father in by tort the heire by remitter the Feme not endowed 62 If a man hath title of action to recover land and after he enters F. N. B. 149. f. and disseiseth the Tenant of the land and dieth seized by which his heir enters here the heir is remitted to the title that his Ancestor had and the Feme of the Baron that so dieth seized shall lose her dower because that estate which the Baron had is determined for that was an estate of fee by tort and the heire hath an estate of fee which was in his Ancestor by right c. Feme not endowed of the rents but of the land 63 If a man make a gift in taile reserving rent to him and his heirs F. N. B. 149. g. and after the Donor taketh Feme and dieth and the Tenant in taile also dies without issue Here the Feme of the Donor shall not be endowed of the rent because the rent is extinct for it was reserved upon an estate taile which is determined But in this case albeit the estate taile of the rent is determined yet shall the Feme be endowed of the land because that doth still continue and is not determined as is the rent A remainder must have an estate to support it 64 By the rule of the Law a remainder ought to have a preceding estate to support it And if that preceding estate faile Pl. Co. 35. a. in Colthrists case the remainder fails also As if a lease for life had been made to a Monk the remainder in fee this remainder had been void because the Monk had no capacity to take the estate for life and so the estate preceding the remainder is void and then ex consequente the remainder is void also Appropriation disappropriate Ancient Demesn restored 65 A Church appropriated to a spiritual Corporation 3 E. 3. 74. b. becometh disappropriate if the Corporation be dissolved Finch 14. 66 A dissesor of Lands in ancient Demesn 49 E. 3. 8. the Lord confirms unto him to hold at the Common Law the Dissesee re-entreth Now shall
50. E. 3. nu 123. And it hath béen attempted in Parliament to give an action of accompt against the Executors of a Guardian in Soccage but never could be effected â—â—nity and 〈◊〉 charge 3 An annuity is a yearly payment of a certain sum of money granted to another in fée for life or yeares Co. ib. 144. b. 3. and charging the person of the Grantor onely but doth not enure to the Grantée onely for his heire and his and their Grantée shall have a writ of Annuity but if a Rent charge be granted to a man and his heires he shall not have a writ of Annuity against the heire of the Grantor albeit he hath assets unlesse the grant be for him and his heirs â—â—cisor â—ease 4 If a Disseisor make a lease for life the remainder in fée Co. ib. 275. b. 2. and the Disseisée releaseth unto the tenant for life all his right this release shall enure to him in remainder because as to this and some other purposes they are but as one Tenant in Law Howbeit if the Disseisée release all actions to the Tenant for life after the death of the Tenant for life he in the remainder shall not take benefit of this release for it extended onely to the Tenant for life and ended with his life as it was adjudged in Edw Althams case Co. l. 8. 148. So also if the Disseisor make a lease for life and the Disseisée release all actions to the Lessée this enureth not to him in the reversion c. â—taile in an â—cale 5 In a writ of right when the tryall is by Battaile Co. ib. â—94 b. 4. neither the Tenant nor Demandant shall fight for themselves but shall finde each of them a Champion to fight for them because if either the Demandant or Tenant should be slain no judgement could be given for the lands and tenements in question It is otherwise in an appeal for here the Defendant shall fight for himselfe and so shall the Plaintiff also because there if the Defendant be slaine the Plaintiff hath the effect of his suit viz. the death of the Defendant c. â—â—mment in life of â—â—tor and â—â—ntee 6 Vpon the grant of any thing whereunto attornment is necessary Co. ibid. 309. a. 4. as of a Seigniory rent reversion remainder c. the attornment must be made during the lives both of the Grantor and also of the Grantée for if either of them die before attornment the grant is void And the reason hereof is for that every grant must take effect as to the substance thereof in the lifetime both of the Grantor and of the Grantée whereas in this case if the Grantor dieth before attornment the seigniory rent reversion remainder c. descends to his heire and therefore after his decease the attornment cometh too late so likewise if the Grantée dieth before attornment an attornment to the heire is void for nothing descended to him and if he should take he should do it as a purchasor whereas heires were added but as words of limitation of the estate and not to take as purchasors c. Co. lib. 2. 36. a. Sir Rowland Heywards case 7 If a man for good consideration bargain sell Election and demise a reversion of land to the use of another for yeares and the Grantor or Cestuy que use die before attornment or enrollment the grant is in this case void or good at the election of Cestuy que use void if taken at the Common Law by way of grant because then there wants attornment but good by way of Bargain and Sale according to the Statute of Vses 27 H. 8. cap. 10. and because the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 16. of Enrolments extendeth not unto it for that no estate of Franktenement pâ—sseth but onely an estate for yeares And notwithstanding the death of the Grantor and Cestuy que use either one or both the Executors or Administrators of Cestuy que use have power as well as Cestuy que use himselfe to choose by which way they will claime whether by way of grant at the Common Law or by way of Bargain and Sale according to the said Statute of Vses because Cestuy que use had immediately upon the grant a present interest in him which hee or in case he had died his Executors before election might have assigned over and for that he claims one and the same thing by two several wayes it being in his or his Executors power to choose which of them they please It is otherwise where the election is to choose one of two several things by one and the same way or title for then nothing passeth before election and that election must be made during the life of the parties And therefore if I have thrée horses and I give unto you one of my horses in this case the election ought to be made in the life of the parties for in as much as none of the horses is given in certain the certainty and therefore the property commenceth by election And with this agrées Bullocks case in the 10 of Eliz. 281. The Bishop of Sarum having a great Wood of 1000 acres called Berewood enfeoffs another of an house and of 17 acres parcell of the said wood and makes livery in the house here nothing passeth of the wood before election and therefore his heire could not make election c. Co l. 8. 6â— a. 1. in Jo Trollops case 8 If the Bishop make Certificate and die before it be received Certificatâ— a Bishop the Certificate is worth nothing but the Successor ought to certifie a new Fitz. 55. Co. lib. 9. 87. a. 4. Pinsons case 9 An action of Debt lyeth not against Executors upon a contract for the eating and drinking of the Testator for that action dieth with him Wager of Law Executors because in that case the Executors cannot wage their Law as the Testator might have done for a man shall never have an action against Executors where the Testator might in his life time have waged his Law because they cannot have the benefit of Law-wager as he might have had c. 15 E. 4. Vide infrà 14. Co. lib. 11. 1. The Lord De la Wares case 10 Of the family of the Lord De la Ware there was Grandfather Dignity restrained foâ— life Father and Sonne the Grandfather 3 H. 8. was summoned to the Parliament by Writ and after in 3 E. 6. it was enacted that the father should be disabled during his life from claiming any dignity but was afterwards by Qu Eliz. called to the Parliament and sate in the House as a puisne Lord and died after whose death the sonne sued in Parliament to be restored to the place of his Grandfather viz. betwixt the Lord Berkley and the Lord Willoughby of Ersby and it was granted him For there was a diversity taken betwixt a disability personal and
temporary and a disability absolute and perpetual As if a man be attainted of Treason or Felony this is absolute and perpetual disability by corruption of Blood and shall barre any of his posterity to claime any hereditament in Fée-simple as heire unto him or to any other Ancestor paramount him But when a man is onely disabled by Parliament without any attainder to claime any dignity for his life this is a personal disability for his life onely and his heire after his death may claim as heire to him or to any of his Ancestors above him c. And upon this diversity Thomas Lord De la ware Anno 39 Eliz. was restored to the place in Parliament originally belonging to his Family Wast by Baron 11 Where a lease is made to the Baron and Feme for terme of life or yeares the Feme shall not be punished for Waste F.N.B. 59. â— committed by the Baron after the Barons death M. 3. E. â— Battery 12 When a corporal hurt or damage is done to a man 12 H. 8. 12. as to beat him c. if he or the party beaten die the action is gone Finch 17. Covenant by Lessor 13 The Lessor covenants to pay quit-rents during the terme 1 2 P.M. 114. Finch 17. and dieth his Executors shall not pay them for it is a personal covenant which dieth with the person Debt against Executors 14 In debt against Executors who plead fully administred Dyer 32. 2 28 29 H. 8. and they gave in evidence to the Inquest that they had paid divers debts upon contracts made by the Testator whereas this suit was upon an obligation whereupon the Plaintiff demurres And it séemed to the Iustices that there was no cause to delay it because they were not compellable to pay such debts for that they die with the person and the Plaintiff had judgement de bonis testatoris Quit-rents 15 The Lessor covenants with the Lessée to pay and beare all quit-rents c. not naming his Executors or Assignes If the Lessor die Dyer 114. a. 60 1 2 P. M. his Executors are not bound according to the opinion of divers Iustices Tamen quaere Covenant implyed and expresse 16 If there be Tenant for life remainder in fée Dyer 257. 13. 9 Eliz. and Tenant for life demise for 15 yeares and die he in remainder enters and the termor brings covenant against the Executors of the Lessor upon the Demise onely which is but an implyed covenant and it was adjudged it would not lie albeit the lease were by Indenture unlesse it had béen broken in the life of the Testator it is otherwise also of an expresse covenant But an implyed covenant is personal and dies with him Vide Stat. 32 H. 8. 34. Note that if the heire out the termor of the father covenant lies against him upon the demise for the privity Vide Max. 55. Licence to retaile wines 17 Quéen Mary grants to one licence to sell Wines by retaile with a non obstante the Statute of 7 E. 6. 5. and doth not limit how long Dyer 270. 22. 10 Eliz. but there is a commandment in the Patent to the Officers to permit him to do it during his life And it was held by Dyer and Sanders that it was durante bene-placito onely and that the pleasure determined by the death of the Quéen the commandment ceased also by her death Warden of the Fleet. 18 Whitacres brings an action of Debt against the Executors of the Warden of the Fleet upon an escape in the life of the Testator Dyer 322. 25. 15 Eliz. and it was adjudged it would not lie because the offence was but trespasse which died with the person And by the Common Law debt did not lie against the Warden but an action upon the Case until the Statute of 1 R. 2. 12. which gives debt against the Warden but speaks neither of Heire or Executor It is otherwise where the recovery is in the life of the Warden 48 Things do enure diversly according to the diversity of the time Purchase by Inhabitants 1 The Parishioners or Inhabitants or probi homines de Dale Co. Inst pars 1. 3. a. 2. or the Church-wardens are not capable to purchase lands but goods they are unlesse it were in ancient time when grants were allowed to passe by such names Grant to commoners 2 An ancient grant by the Lords to the Commoners in such a waste Co. ibid. that a way leading to their Common should not be straitned was good but otherwise it is of such a grant at this day And so in ancient time a grant made to a Lord hominibus suis tà m liberis quà m nativis or the like was good but they are not of capacity to purchase by such a name at this day c. Co. l. 9 28. a. 3. in the case of the Abbot of strata Marcella 3 When an ancient grant is general obscure or ambiguous A charter interpreted as the Law was when it was made it shall not be now interpreted as a Charter made at this day but it shall be construed as the Law was taken at the time when such ancient Charter was made and according to the ancient allowance upon record Vide ibid. many authorities in the point Vide suprà 25. 22. Co. Inst pars 1. 21. b. 3. 4 If the Donor give lands in liberum maritagium reserving a rent Frankmarriage the fifth degree this reservation shall take no effect till the fourth degrée be past but after that time the rent shall be paid according to the reservation Littl. Sect. 19. Finch 18. Co. ib. 147. b. 1. 5 If a man grant a rent out of Black-acre to one and to his heires Rent-charge and seck and grant to him that he may distrain for this in the same acre for term of his life this is a rent charge for his life and a rent seck afterwards Diversis temporibus Co. l. 7. 24. b. 3. Buts case Co. ib. 171. a. 3. 6 Judicis officium est ut res ita tempora rerum Quaerere quaesito tempore tutus eris Co. ib. 178. a. 4. 7 A gift in Frankmarriage was before the Statute of Westm 2. Frankmarriage out of use a Fée-simple and since that Statute a Fée-taile So as it is true that the gifts do continue as Littleton saith Sect. 271. but not the estates for the estate is changed as appeares in the same Author Cap. Fee-taile And albeit Littleton saith Sect. 271. that such gifts have béen alwayes since used and continued yet now they are almost grown out of use and serve now principally for Moot-cases and questions in law that thereupon were wont to rise Co. l. 5. 119. b. 1. in Whelpdales case 8 When an obligation was once a deed Non est factâ—â— when a deed was and is no deed and after before
2. 4. Sir Ed. dw Althams case and releaseth to the Reversioner omnes actiones c. sectas querelas Demand quaecunque nec non totam dotem suam ac titulum ac actionem dotis sibi contingent c. de aliquibus terris in Wethersfield c. this is onely a Release of her Dower in Wethersfield and not in Gosfield â—â—peachment Wast 6 If a man demise Land for life absque impetitione vasti Co. l. 11. 82. b. 3. Lewis Bowles case the Lessée may cut down the Timber-trees and convert them to his own use but if it be absque impetitione vasti per aliquod breve de vasto In that case the Action onely shall be discharged and not the property in the Trees so that the Lessor after they are felled may seise them c. Co. l. 3. 83. a. 4 Twines case 7 No purchaser shall avoid a precedent conveyance made by fraud and covin What is a good consideration within the Statute of 13 Eliz. 5. but he that is a purchaser for money or other valuable consideration For albeit in the preamble of the Statute of 13 El. 5. it is said For money or other good consideration and likewise in the bodie of the Act For money or other good consideration Yet these words good consideration are to be understood onely of valuable consideration and this appears well by the clause which concerns them that have power of revocation for there it is said For money or other good consideration paid or given and this word paid is to be referred to money and given is to be referred to good consideration so the sense is For money paid or other good consideration given which words exclude all considerations of nature bloud or the like and are to be understood of valuable consideration which may be given and therefore he that makes the purchase of the land for valuable consideration is the onely purchaser within that Statute And this last clause doth well expound these words other good consideration mentioned before in the preamble and bodie of that Act. 54 No man can do an act to himself Co. Inst pars 1. 38. b. 4. 39 a. 4. 1 A Feme Guardian in Soccage shall not endow her selfe De la plus beale without judgement Feme Doweâ— but after judgement she may as Littleton saith § 49. for then it is the act of the Law and not simply hers Co. ib. 48. b. 1. 2 If A. by Déed give lands to B. to have and to hold after the death of A. to B. and his heirs this is a void déed Grant in fâ—turo void because he cannot reserve to himselfe a particular estate and construction must be made upon the whole déed Littl. §. 168. Co. ib. 112. a. 3 A man cannot make any grant of lands Baron canâ—â— grant to feâ—â—â— c. to his wife during the Coverture because they are but one person in Law and a man cannot do an act to himselfe c. Littl. §. 212. Co. ib. 141. a. 4 A man cannot be judge in his owne cause No distresse iâ—repleviable and therefore if a man will prescribe that if any Cattle he Damage fesant upon the Demesnes of his Mannor he may detaine them untill he be satisfied for the damage at his own will and pleasure this custome is repugnant to reason and ought not to be allowed by the Iudges For Malus usus abolendus est quia in consuetudinibus non diuturnitas temporis sed soliditas rationis est confideranda Co. ib. 141. a. 2. Finch 19. 5 A fine levied before the Bailiffs of Salop was reversed A Fine void because one of the Bailiffs was party to the fine Quia nemo debet esse judex in propria causa Nemo potest esse judex c. Hillar 4. H. 4. Coram Rege Salop. Littl. §. 479 480. Co. ib. 280. a. 1. and 307. a. 4. Littl. §. 543 544. 6 If there be Lord and Tenant Extinguishment of rent c. and the Lord releaseth to the Tenant his Seigniory this must of necessity enure by way of extinguishment For the Tenant cannot have service to be taken of himselfe neither yet can one and the same man be both Lord and Tenant So also if a Rent-charge be granted out of land and the Grantée releaseth or granteth the rent to the Terre-tenant in this case the rent is extinct for a man cannot have land and also rent issuing out of the same land neither yet can he pay the rent to himselfe There is the same reason of Common of Pasture released to the Tenant of the land for that also works an extinguishment because a man cannot have Land and a Common of Pasture issuing out of the same land c. Co. ib. 280. a. 3. 7 If there be Lord and Tenant by Fealty and Rent Increasing extinguishment the Lord granteth the Seigniory for yeares and the Tenant attorneth the Lord releaseth his Seigniory to the Tenant for years and to the Tenant of the land generally the whole Seigniory is extinct and the estate of the Lessée also but if the release had béen to them and their heirs then the Lessée had had the inheritance of the one moity and the other moity had béen extinct And the reason of this diversity is because when the release is made generally it cannot enure to the Lessée longer than for life because it enureth by way of enlargement and being made to the Tenant of the land it enureth by way of Extinguishment because he cannot do service to himselfe and then there cannot remaine in the Seigniory a particular estate for life But when the release is made to them and their heirs each one takes a moity the one by way of encreasing of the estate and the other by extinguishment â—cceptance â—ttornment 8 If there be Lord and Tenant Littl. §. 558. Co. ib. 312. b. and the Tenant lets the Tenements to a Feme for term of her life the remainder over in fée the Feme takes Baron and after the Lord grants the services c. to the Baron and his heirs In this case there can be no attornment by parol c. because the Baron that ought to attorn cannot attorn to himselfe but his acceptance of the grant of the Seigniory amounts to an Attornment in Law The like 9 If the Lord grant his Seigniory to the Tenant of the land and to a stranger the Tenant cannot properly and formally attorn to himself Co. ib. 313. a. 1. but his acceptance of the grant is a good attornment in Law to extinguish the one moity and to vest the other moity in the stranger 10 If there be Lord and Tenant and the Tenant take Feme Littl. §. 559. Co. Inst pars 1. 313. a. and after the Lord grant the services to the Feme and her heirs Acceptance Attornment Here can be no
all shall be equally charged 29 E. 3. 39. there is the like case Co. l. 3. 13. a. 3. Sir Wiliam Herberts case Co. l. 3. 13. a. 4. in Sir William Herberts case But it is Sir John Lanfords case 29 E. 3. 50 37 Four men were bound in a Recognisance of debt to A. and after one of the Conusors dies leaving his heir within age A Recognisance by 〈◊〉 and one diâ— the Conusee brings a Scire facias against the thrée Survivours to have execution who plead that the heir of the Conusor who was dead was within age and in as much as during his minority he could not be charged and the Survivours ought not to be charged onely they demand Iudgement c. And because A. could not gainesay it the Court awarded that the Paroll should stay and this Iudgement was afterwards confirmed in the Kings Bench by a writ of Error Co. ibid. b. 3. 38 If Iudgement be given against two Disseisors in an Assise for the land and damages and one of the Disseisors die Judgement â—gainst two Disseisors 〈◊〉 one dies the execution shall not be awarded against the surviving Disseisor that was party to the wrong but the heir as well as the Disseisor shall be equally charged 19 E. 3. tit execution 81. Co. ibid. b. 4. 39 Albeit at the Common Law no land was subject to an execution for the debt of a Common person Land not chargeable with debt but onely by force of certaine Statutes made for that purpose yet the Iudges and Sages of the Law have alwayes expounded general Statutes of that nature according to the Rule of the Common Law which is alwayes grounded upon the perfection of reason and not according to any private and sudden conceit and opinion And therefore in as much as the said Statutes have subjected a mans land to an execution for his debt the Iudges and Sages of the Law have considered the rule and reason of the Common Law in case of the heir of an Obligor in which case the land was subject to an execution for debt by the Common Law and accordingly do adjudge and resolve the cases which arise upon the said Statutes Co. ib. 1â— a. 1. 40 If two men alien land with warranty Land equâ— charged the land of the one shall not be onely rendred in value neither yet if one of them die the land of the Survivour shall be onely rendred in value but the charge shall be laid equally upon them For a Ioynt bond that binds the land shall not survive or lie onely upon the Survivour as in case of a joynt warranty where two for them and their heirs warrant the land to another and his heirs the Survivour shall not be solely vouched neither yet may the Sheriffe deliver the land to the one or the other at his pleasure for in executions which concerne the realty and charge the land the Sheriffe cannot make execution of the land to one onely So also if two are bound to warranty and both die both the heire ought to be vouched and both of them ought to be equally charged â—equality of third part â—cending â—ands in â—ite requiâ— in a devise 34 H. 8. 41 Willam Barnerds and his wife being seised of the Mannor of Hinton in tail being the wives joynture and holden in Capite Co. l. 3. 32. a. 4. Butler and Bakers case And W. B. being also seised of lands in Fobing both which amounted to the full third part of all his lands And W. B. being likewise seised of the Mannor of Thoby holden also in Capite which amounted to two third parts c. W. B. devised to his wife the Mannor of Th. upon condition that she should waive her former joynture c. W. B. dies the wife in pais refuseth her former joynture In this case W. B. could not by the Statutes of Wills 32 34 H. 8. devise the whole Mannor of Thoby because the Mannor of H. and the lands in F. were not a third part of the cleer yearly value of all his lands as they ought to be according to the provision of the said Statutes for that the cléer title and present possession of the Mannor of H. was but in possibility and depended méerly upon the will and pleasure of the wife and she could not by a bare refusal in pais devest her title to the joynture But in that case W. B. had onely power by those Statutes to devise two third parts of the Mannor of H. and also two third parts of the rest of his lands to the end that the King might have an equal and proportionable third part apparelled with like accidents and circumstances that the other two thirds parts were according to the true intent and meaning of the same Statutes â—fine for â—ars within â—e Statute of 1 H. 7. 20. 42 If a Feme Tenant in taile accept a fine Sur conisance de droit come ceo c. and thereby doth grant and render the land for 1000 years Co. l. 3. 51. b. 2. in Sir George Browns case pretending that this is not within the words of the Statute of 11 H. 7. cap. 20. which prohibits discontinuance alienation release c. Yet that is alienation within the intention of the same act because within the same mischiefe c. â—ses within â—e Stat. of H. 8. 10. â—ough not â—thin the letâ— of that â—at 43 If a man make a feofment to the use of himselfe for his life Co. l. 4. 2. a. 2. Vernons case and after to the use of his wife for her life for the joynture of the wife this estate in remainder is within the intent of the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. For albeit that Statute doth onely expresse these five forms viz. 1 To the Baron and Feme and to the heirs of the Baron 2 To the Baron and Feme and to the heirs of their two bodies 3 To the Baron and Feme and to the heirs of the bodie of one of them 4 To the Baron and Feme for their lives 5 To the Baron and Feme for the life of the Feme yet many other estates not there particularly exprest are within that act for the said particular forms are but put there for examples and not to exclude any other estate which is to the like effect and accords with the intent of the makers of the same Act So likewise an estate in Fée simple conveyed to the Feme for her joynture Co. ibid. 3. b. 1. per Dyer in Villiers and Beuamonts case 4 5. P. M. 146. and in satisfaction of her Dower is a joynture within the equity of the said Act for that is a competent livelyhood to the Feme of an estate of Frank-tenement to take effect presently after the death of the Baron for all the life of the Feme and more And so it is resolved in Sir Morrice Dennis case 8.
Eliz. Dyer 248. And therefore the case of 6 E. 6. Dower Br. 69. where it is said that an estate in Fee simple conveyed to the Feme for her joynture is not within the Stat. of 27 H. 8. is misreported and ought to be intended that such an estate is not within the Statute of 11 H. 7. cap. 20. which restraines the alienations of Femes c. â—ubsequent â—tute may taken withâ—â—he equity 44 It is frequent in our books that an Act made of later time shall be taken within the equity of an Act made long before Co. ibid. So the Statute of Malbridge which was made Anno 52 H. 3. gives the ward of the heir of the Tenant that holds by Knight Service notwithstanding a feofment made by collusion at which time of a Statute made long â—fore and for 200 years after and more viz. untill the Statute of 4 H. 7. cap. 17. which gives the ward of the heir of Cestuy que use the heir of Cestuy que use was not in ward And yet it is holden in 27 H. 8. 9. if Cestuy que use since the Statute of 4 H. 7. make feofment in fée by Collusion to defraud the Lord of his ward that is taken within the equity of the said Statute of Malbridge Co. ibid. 4. a. 4. b. So also the Statute De donis conditionabilibus made 13 E. 1. as to the warranty of the Tenant in tail with assets is taken within the equity of the Statute of Gloucester cap. 3. made 6 E. 1. as it is held 11 E. 2. tit garranty Stath 38 E. 3. 23. For a Formedon in descender was given in lieu of a Mortdancester Likewise the Statute of Westm 2 cap. 25. made 13 E. 1. gives a Certificate but it gives not adjournment Howbeit adjournment is taken by the equity of the Statute of Magna Carta cap. 12. made 9 H. 3. as it is held 12 H. 4. 9. So the Statute of 7 R. 2. cap. 10. gives an Assise for rent in confinio Comitatus and Redisseisin is also taken in case of rent by the equity of the Statute of Merton cap. 3. made 20 H. 3. Vide 1 E. 3. 25. b. So in Dyer 12 Eliz. 289. Pl. 60. The Bishop of London being one of the High Commissioners by force of the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 1. was translated to the Arch Bishoprick of Yorke yet his authority notwithstanding that preferment remaines by force of the Statute of 1 E. 6. cap. 7. So also albeit lands were not devisable till the 32 H. 8. yet if a man devise lands to a woman for terme of her life or in tail c. for her joynture and in satisfaction of her Dower that is a joynture within the Act of the 27 H. 8. For as an estate for life made to a Feme for her joynture before marriage when she is not his wife is within the equity of that Act So an estate for life devised to a Feme for her life which takes effect after his death when the marriage is dissolved is also within the equity of the same Act because such an estate stands well with the intent of the makers of the same Act of 27 H. 8. Co. ibid. 5 â—l Dyer 20. in the Court of Wards and likewise with the nature of the joynture intended thereby And therefore if a man seised of certaine lands in fée holden in Soccage and of other land in tail holden in Capite devise by his Will in writing the third part of all his lands to his wife in recompence of her Dower and dies and the wife enter into the third part of the lands holden in Fée simple that shall be a barre of her Dower by force of the said Act of 27 H. 8. It is otherwise where a man deviseth land to his wife for terme of her life Co. ibid. 4. a. 3. M. 38. 39 El. inter Leak and Randal in Cur. Gardorum c. generally for that cannot be averred to be for her joynture c. because a devise imports a consideration in it selfe and unlesse it be plainly exprest in the will what it is for it shall be taken onely as a benevolence neither yet can any averment be taken out of the Will unlesse it properly arise or may be collected out of the words contained in the same Will c. Vide 51. Co. l. 4. 57. a. 3. in the case of the Sadlers c. 45 Albeit the Statute of 36 E. 3. cap. 13. Equity of the Stat. of 36â— 3. 13. gives travers and Monstrance de droit from Lands seised into the Kings hands by offices returned onely into the Chancery yet by equity of that Statute if the offices be returned into the Exchequer and not into the Chancery there also the Subject may put in his traverse or Monstrance de droit as appeares by a president in Qu. Eliz. time betwéen the said Quéen and one Collins and Howstead Co. l. 4. 65. a. 4. in Fulwoods case 46 Although the Stat. of Westm 2. cap. 18. which gives the Elegit Equity esâ— Stat of Eleâ— W. 2. 18. names onely the Sheriff to execute it yet by equity of the same Stat. the Serjeant of the Mace in London or any other immediate Officer to any of the Kings Courts of Record may execute the same Writ in their several jurisdictions c. Co. l. 4. 106. b. 1. Adams and Lamberts case 47 Albeit by the Stat. of the 1 E. 6. cap. 14. Equity of thâ— Stat. of Sâ—stitious usâ— 1 E. 6. 14. onely such estate given to superstitious uses as are to have continuance for ever séem to be given to the King Yet other estates of lesse continuance as estates in taile for life c. imployed for such uses are also given to the King by the equity of the same Act And the rather because Omne majus continet in se minus â—enant in â—wer shall â—ot recover â—cording to â—er losse 48 If a man be seised in fee or in taile of three acres Co. l. 4. 122. a. 2. in Bastards case each acre of equal value and dies the heir endows the Feme of the third acre and after the Feme is impleaded by one that hath title paramount and she voucheth the heir Here she shall not recover in value according to her losse but onely the third part of two acres which remain for by the Law she ought to have but the third part of that which her husband might keep and enjoy by good title c. Vide plus ib. Discretion liâ—ited by reaâ—â—n 23 H. 8. 5. 49 The Commissioners of Sewers upon the Statutes of 6 H. 6. Co. l. 5. 99. b. 4. in Rooks case cap. 5. 23 H. 8. cap. 5. are not onely to charge those that have lands adjoining upon the Banks Ditches Gutters c. but likewise all others that are in any danger or shall receive any profit by
this Case the mesnaltie is not suspended during the life of the Mesne by force of that remainder in taile for a remainder in taile or for life expectant upon an estate for life or in taile shall never suspend a mesnaltie Seigniory Rent c. because albeit the remainder vests presently yet that cannot suspend the present Frank-tenement of the Rent during the life of the first Tenant for life who is indeed the true Tenant to the Lord or to the reversioner upon whom avowry shall be made c. and as a Signiory Rent c. cannot be suspended in part and in esse for part in respect of the Land out of which it is issuing so neither can a Signiory Rent c. be suspended in remainder and yet be in esse for a particular Estate in possession for then necessarily there must insue fractions of Estates and particular Estates shall be created without Donors or Lessors against the Rules and Maximes of the Law c. It is otherwise if the mesne grant his mesnaltie to one for life or in taile the remainder to the Tenant peravaile in Fee for in that case the mesnalty is totally extinct because there the Tenant peravaile hath as high an Estate in the inheritance of the Mesnaltie as he hath in the Tenancie neither is there in that case any possibilitie of reviving the Mesnaltie and here also the mesnaltie is not extinct for the Inheritance and in esse for the particular Estate for life or in taile in possession but the mesnaltie by the remainder in Fée is extinct in all for otherwise this absurdity would follow that there would be a Fée-simple of the Tenancie peravaile and also a Fée-simple of Signiory perament and but an Estate for life or in taile onely of the mesnaltie and so a Tenancie in Fée-simple shall be onely holden of a mesnaltie for life or in taile and a Signiorie in Fee shall be issuing out of a mesnaltie for life or in taile onely which is impossible and can by no meanes be c. Vide 3 H. 6. 1. 15 E. 4. 12. Co. l. 10. 128. a. 4. in Cluns Case 64 If Tenant for life make a Lease for yeares rendring Rent at Easter and the Lessée occupie for three quarters of the yeare A term in … and in the last quarter before Easter the Tenant for life dies here shall be no apportionment of Rent for three quarters of the yeare because the time is intire and in respect thereof there shall be no apportionment neither yet was the Rent due before Easter Howbeit in the same case if part of the land had been avicted before Easter and that Feast had incurred in the life of the Lessor there shall be an apportionment of the Rent but not in respect of the time which doth still continue but in regard that part of the Land demised is evicted c. Vide 27 E. 3. 84. b. Co. l. 10. 134. b. 3. in Read and Redmans Case 65 In Actions meerly personal or personal and in some sort mixt with the realtie in which intire things are demanded Actions Intire if there be divers Plaintifes and one be summoned and severed the death of him which is so summoned and severed where the intire thing survives to the other shall not abate the writ as in a writ of ward of the body or the like c. Co. lib. 11. 4. a. 2. in Auditor Curles Case 66 The Office of Auditors of the Court of Wards according to Statute of 22 H. 8. cap. 46. cannot be granted in reversion The Office of Auditor of the Court of wardâ— intire because they two make up one Iudge or Iudicial Officer of that Court and as none can give judgement of things in futuro so neither may any be admitted a judge in futuro according to the Rule Officia judicialia non concedantur antequam vacent And besides great inconvenience might insue thereupon for he that is at the time of the grant sufficient to execute it may perhaps when it falls be un-capable and un-sufficient for it And albeit that Office be onely in part judicial and in part ministerial and ministerial Offices may be granted in reversion yet in as much as two persons have both of them but one Office are as one Officer that Office is by the said Act made so intire that it cannot possibly be divided for the King cannot make two Auditors of the minister inâ— Office and other two to execute the Iudicial part because then there would be four persons which the Act restraines to two neither yet can the King make one Person to have the judicial voice and the other the ministerial Office For then there would be two Officers and two Offices whereas the Act makes but one Officer and then also one of them shall have a distinct Office and voice whereas the Act joynes them together in two Persons And therefore in as much as the ministerial part is so united with the judicial part and that joyntly in two Persons which make up one intire Officer that there is no possibility of severing the one from the other as the judicial part cannot be granted in reversion so neither can the ministerial c. Trespas intire though against many 67 When in Trespass against divers Defendants Co. lib. 11. b. 1. in S John Heydon Case Ibid. 7. a. 2. 43 El. Rotulo 1694. inter Austeâ— Pl. and Willar and Ald. Ded fen they plead non culp or several pleas and the Iury finds for the Plaintife in all the Iurors cannot assesse several damages against the Defendants because it is but one Trespas and also made joynt by the Plaintifs writ and count And albeit one of them be the most malicious and de facto doth the greatest wrong yet all coming forth to do an unlawful Act and being all of one partie the Act of one is the Act of all that are present and of the same partie And therefore in such case if the hand of one of them onely gives a mortall wound whereupon death followes that is murder in all that are present and of the same partie albeit the others intended not to give a wound so mortal as appeares in Mekallies Case in the 9. Report Copercenery â—intiâ—e 68 If two Caperceners Tenants in taile lose by default F. N. B. 155. h albeit the default of the one is not the default of the other yet in respect of the intirenesse of their estate they shall joyne in a Quod ei deforciat c. M. 46. 3 E. An execution â—ntire 69 If an execution be sued of the body and of the land Pl. Co. Rosses Case and afterward the Conusor enfeoffs the Conuse of parcel of the land or surrenders parcel of the land unto him or the fée-simple of parcel thereof descends upon him in all these cases both body and land are discharged for by the execution against the body land
against their wills and by good advise he was cleerly discharged thereof See more examples to the same purpose ubi in marg Co. l. 7. 25. b. 1. in Calvins Case 45 Foedera percutere to make Leagues Peace warâ— Denization doth onely and wholy pertaine to the King and not to the subject so also doth Bellum indicere Likewise the King onely without the subject may make not onely letters of safe conduct but letters patents of Denization to whom and how many he please and may enable them at his pleasure to sue any of his subjects in any action whatsoever real or personal which the King could not do without the subject if the subject had any Interest given unto him by the Law in any thing concerning an Alien borne Nay the Law is more precise herein then in a number of other Cases of higher Nature For the King cannot grant to any other to make of strangers born Denizens it is by the Law it self so inseparably and individually annexed to his Royal Person as the Book is in 20 H. 7. 8. because the Law esteemeth it a point of high prerogative Jus majestatis inter insignia summae potestatis to make Aliens borne subjects of the Realme and capable of the Lands and Inheritances of England in such sort as any natural borne subject is And therefore by the Statute of the 27 H. 8. cap. 24. many of the most ancient prerogatives and Royal Flowers of the Crowne as Authority to pardon Treason Murder Man-slaughter and Felonie Power to make Iustices in Eyre Iustices of Assise Iustices of Peace and Gaol-delivery and the like having béen severed and divided from the Crowne were again remitted to the same But authority to make Letters of Denization was never mentioned therein to be resumed because there was never any that claymed the same by any pretext whatsoever being a matter of so high a point of prerogative c. Co. l. 7. 14. a. 4. in Englefeilds Case 46 A. Seised of the Mannor of Dale in Fée A Covenâ—â— Power of Revocation Covenants with B. to stand seised to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to B. in tail the remainder to B. in Fée with proviso that upon delivery or tender of a ring to B. by himselfe or another as the Estates shall be void A. is out-lawed for treason the King seiseth the Land and lets a Lease to D. for 40 yeares Treason Seisure and after the King gives a Commission under the Great Seale to E. to tender the ring to B. according to the Condition In this Case if a Common Person had enjoyned the Kings Estate by making such a Lease of 40 yeares Demise by thâ— Kings power Revocation remaines he had utterly deprived himself of revoking the Estate and of taking advantage of the Condition because his Act shall be most interpreted against himselfe But in that Case the Kings demise shall not enure to his special prejudice to two intents viz. To a demise of Land and also to a suspension of his Condition whereby he might defeat the Estate for life and the other Estates that depend upon it or to a demise in respect of his present Estate pur auter vie and also to a Confirmation in respect of his Condition whereby otherwise he might defeat all as shall be also in Case of a Common Person For the Kings grant shall always be taken according to his expresse intention comprehended in his grant and shall not extend to any other thing by Construction or Implication when it appeares not by his grant that his Intent extended unto it and therefore in such Cases the King ought to be truly informed and he ought to make a special and particular grant which by expresse words may enure to all such several intents as are desired c. Co. l. 7. 16. a. 4. in the Case of Swasn 47 All White Swans not marked Swans wilde which have gained their liberty and swim in an open and common River may be seised to the use of the King by his prerogative Because Volatilium quae sunt ferae naturae alia sunt regalia alia Communia Now a Swan is a Royal bird and therefore if the propertie thereof be not knowne it belongs to the King by his prerogative And there was always an ancient Officer of the King called Magister deductus Cignorum who continues even to this day Neverthelesse the subject may also have property in white Swans not marked Swans not marked in private waters as some may have Swans not marked in their private waters the property whereof belongs unto them and not unto the King And albeit they escape out of their private waters yet they may take them and convey them home again And with this agrées Bracton lib. 2. cap. 1. fol. 9. Si autem animalia fera fuerint mansueta ex consuetudine eunt redeunt volant revolant ut sunt Cervi Cigni Pavones Columbae hujusmodi eo usque nostra intelligantur quamdiu habuerint animum revertendi But if they once gain their natural liberty and do swim in open and common Rivers the Kings Officer may seise them in the open and common River for the King because one white Swan without such pursuit as is aforesaid cannot be known from another And when the property of a Swan cannot be known it being of its nature a Royal Fowl it belongs to the King c. Duke of Cornâ—al 48 In the Princes Case Co. l. 8. fol. 28. a. It was resolved Co. lib. 8. 28. a. 3. in the Princes Case that the Act of 11 E. 3. by force whereof the Kings eldest son was made Duke of Cornwall was such an Act. whereof the Iudges and all the Realm ought to take Conusance because it concerned the King and his first-born son and heir apparent to the Crown for the time being perpetuis futuris temporibus Conusance of an Act of Parliament for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his subjects who are under his Laws are divided from him being their Head and Soveraign So that the Kings affairs concern the whole Kingdome and especially when the Prince the first begotten son of the King and his Heir apparent to the Crown is therein concerned Corruscat enim Princeps radiis Regis Patris sui censetur una persona cum ipso Rege Treason against the Prince as it is declared in the Act of Parliament of 38 H. 6. And therefore if any shall intend the death of the Prince and shall make declaration thereof by some overt Act that is Crimen laesae Majestatis high Treason by the ancient Common Lawes of England and is so declared by the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. Prince 49 1 H. 5. fol. 7. If the Prince as Prince of Wales Co. ib. b. 2. hath judgment to recover and afterwards the Crown descends to him he
Quare vi armis and since that by sundry Statutes in divers other Actions viz. in Accompt debt detinue annuity Covenant Action upon the Statute of 5 R. 2. Action upon the Case c. Co. ibid. 201. b. 2 4 Villenage is such an exception in any plea brought by the Villein against the Lord that it shall make the writ abate Dis-ability persons so that he shall not have a resummons or Re-attachment as in Case of the Excommunication c. Co. ibid. 158. a. 1. 5 If a man be out-lawed in Trespass debt No Juror or any other Action he is thereby disabled to serve of a Iury for that is a principal Challenge to the Poll viz. propter delictum because he is Exlex and therefore is not legalis homo Co. ibid. 132. b. 4. 6 A man exiled or banished beyond Sea viz. by authority of Parliament Exiled Abjured Dead The Feme may sue or in Case of abjuration upon an Ordinary procéeding of Law is in the nature of a dead man in Law And therefore in such Case his Wife may sue or be sued without him as in Case when a man enters in Religion and is profest a Monk c. Thus it was in the Case of the Wife of Sir Robert Belknap 2 H. 4. 7. a. one of the Iustices of the Court of Common Pleas for during his banishment being yet alive she brought a writ in her owne name whereupon one said Ecce modò mirum quòd foemina fert breve Regis Non nominando virum conjunctim robore Legis So likewise E. 3. 10 E. 3. 53. 1 H. 4. 1. b. Pl. in Parl. 19 E. 1. brought a Quare Impedit against the Lady Maltravers and after that H. 4. brought a writ of Ward against Sibill B. during the exile of her Husband The like was also adjudged at the Parliament holden in Crastinum Epiphanum Ann. 19 E. 1. in the Case of Margery de Mose Wife of Th. of Weyland being the yeare before abjured the Realme for felony c. Howbeit if the Husband by Act of Parliament have judgement to be exiled but for a time which some call a Relegation that is no civil death but abjuration in 8 E. 2. Coron 425. is called a divorce betwéen the Husband and the Wife And therefore in that Case the Wife may sue and be sued c. Co. ib. 2. a. 4. Co. l. 7. 17. a. 2. in Calvins Case 25. a. 4. Calv. Case 7 If an Alien Christian or Infidel purchases houses lands Aliens purchase is the Kings tenements or hereditaments to him and his heires albeit he can have no heires yet he is of capacity to take a fée-simple but not to hold for upon an Office found the King shall have them by his prerogative of whomsoever the land is holden and in that Case the Lord shall lose his Seigniory So it is also if he purchase land and die for in that likewise the Law casteth the fréehold and inheritance upon the King If an Alien purchase any Estate of frée-hold in lands c. upon Office found the King shall have them If an Alien be made denizen and purchase lands and die without issue the Lord of the fée shall have the escheate and not the King If an Alien purchase a lease for yeares upon Office found the King shall have it unlesse it be of an house for habitation to the end he may use Merchandize and Commerce Howbeit such an house also if he return home and leave or die the King shall have it and not his Executors c. â—ne born out 〈◊〉 the Kings â—geance 8 A man seised of land in fée hath issue an Alien Co. ib. 8. a. 1. that is borne out of the Kings Ligeance he cannot be heire propter defectum subjectionis albeit he is borne within lawfull marriage And if he be made Denizen by the Kings letters patents yet cannot he inherit to his father or any other But it is otherwise if he be naturalized by Act of Parliament for he is not then accounted in law Alienigena but Indigena â—ue not inâ—â—ritable 9 When an Alien is made Denizen the issue Co. ib. Co. l. 7. 7. a. 4. in Calvins Casâ— 36 H. 8. dâ—nizen Br. 9 that he hath afterwards shall be heire to him but no issue that he had before So likewise if an Alien commeth into England and hath issue two Sonnes these two Sonnes are Indigenae subjects borne because they are borne within the Realme and yet if one of them purchase lands in Fée and dieth without issue his Brother shall not be his heire for there was never any Inheritable bloud betwéen the Father and them and where the Sonnes by no possibility can be heires to the Father the one of them shall not be heire to another Co. ibid. 129. a. 3. It is otherwise of naturalization by Act of Parliament for if the Father he naturalized by Parliament the Issue had before c. shall Inherit So if an Issue of an English-man be borne beyond Sea and the Issue be naturalized by Parliament he shall Inherit his Fathers Land but so he shall not although made Denizen because no Alien naturalized by Act of Parliament is to all intents and purposes as a naturall borne subject but so is not a Denizen Dower â—enant by Courtesie 10 If a man be seised af an Estate of frée-hold and inheritance in lands c. and take an Alien to Wife and dieth Co. ib. 31. b. 4. Co. l. 7. 25. a. 4. Calv. Case she shall not be endowed neither shall the Baron be Tenant by the courtesie Howbeit it is otherwise in the Kings Case c. And Edmond the Brother of E. 1. married the Quéen of Navarre and died And it was resolved by all the Iudges that she should be endowed of the third part of all the lands whereof her husband was seised fée â—is-ability of â—ing 11 It is a good plea in dis-ability of the person Litt. §. 189. Co. ib. 129. b. 1. Co. l. 7. 16. a. 4. in Calv. Case Co. ib. 17. a. 3. Calv. Case that the Demandant or Plaintiffe is an Alien vee and this exception holds good in all Actions both reall and personal against an Alien enemy but not absolutely against other Aliens for the Law doth distinguish betwéen an Alien that is a subject to one who is an enemy to the King and one that is subject to one who is in league with the King And true it is that an Alien Enemy shall maintaine neither Reall nor Personal Action Donec terrae fuerint communes viz. till both Nations be in peace But an Alien that is in league shall maintain personal Actions For such an Alien may trade and traficke buy and sell And then of necessity he must be of ability to have personal Actions but he cannot maintaine either reall or mixt actions So also an
being heir in appearance and he is not bound to dis-able himselfe â—â—ministratiâ—â—â—oid and â—â—able 6 If an Ordinary of a Diocesse commits Administration of Goods Co. l. 5. 29. b. 4. in Princes Case Were and Jefferies Case when they are bona notabilia such Administration is méerly void but Administration committed by the Metropolitan when the defunct had not bona notabilia is onely voidable because he hath Iurisdiction in all the Diocesses within the Province and therefore hath sufficient colour to do it Co. l. 6. 65. a. 3. in Sir Moile Finches Case 7 In 41 E. 3. 19. Rich. Tompson had Issue by Joan before mariage one Agnes and after he marries Joan and makes feofment in fée A Bastard takes by yâ— chase and retakes the Estate to himselfe for life remanere inde Agnetae filiae praedict Rich. Johanne and it was agréed that this was a good remainder without any averment that she was known to be their Daughter for albeit by the Common Law she was not their Daughter yet in as much as she had colour by the Ecclesiastical law which saith subsequens matrimonium tollit peccatum procedens this colour is sufficient in Case of a conveyance to make the remainder good and so note the diversity betwixt descent and purchase c. Co. l. 8. 101. per tout in Sir R. Lechfords Case The better opinion per Coke 8 If there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne Mulier beyonâ— sea c. and the Father die seised the Mulier being beyond Sea within age in Prison or of non sanae memoriae and the Bastard enter and continue in peacable possession of the Lands and hath Issue and dies and the lands descend to his Issue here the right of the Mulier is for ever bound because he hath colour of legitimation by the Law of Holy Church and the Common Law respects legitimation before the above-said Imperfections Vide plus ibid. Co. l. 10. 76. b. in the Case of the Marshalsea 9 If a Sheriffe holding his Torne after Michaelmas moneth takes there an Indictment of Robbery it is utterly void Things done by warrant contra being coram non judice But if the Court of the Common Bench in a plea of Debt award a Capias against a Duke Earle or c. which by the Law lyeth not against them and that appeares in the writ it selfe here if the Sheriffe arrest them upon the Capias albeit the writ be against Law yet because that Court hath jurisdiction of the cause the Sheriffe hath colour to do it and shall be excused and herewith accords Dier 60. b. 38 H. 8. So also if a Iustice of Peace make a warrant to arrest one for Felony who is not indicted albeit the Iustice erre in granting the warrant yet he that makes the arrest by force of that warrant shall not be panished by writ of false imprisonment because the Iustice is Iudge of the Cause Plow 83. b. 1. in Strange and Crokers Case 10 In 9 H. 6. it is said that if I grant to B. Maintenance that if my Tenant for life die during my life that then B. shall have the Land for 10 yeares Here if my Tenant be impleaded B. may lawfully maintaine in respect of the Colour of title he hath to the Land Co. Inst p. 1. 148. b. 4. 11 Entry into Religion and profession of a Disseisor shall not cause a descent to toll the entry of the Disseisée Bastard Mulier because it is the Disseisors owne Act and not the Act of God as death is yet if there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne and the Bastard before claime enter into Religion it is said such a discent shall toll the entry of the Mulier by reason of the colour of title that the Bastard had to the land and such an heire shall also have his age 114 It prizeth the Acts of God and of the Law more then those that are done by the party Co. Inst p. 1. 18. a. 4. 1 Fée-simple being as Littleton saith the largest Estate of inheritance that is Two Fee-simples one Fée-simple cannot depend upon another by the grant of the party as if Lands be given to A. so long as B. hath heires of his body the Remainder over in Fée here the Remainder is void yet in several persons by Act in Law a reversion may be in Fée-simple in one and a Fée-simple determinable in another by matter ex post facto as if a Gift in taile be made to a Villein and the Lord enter the Lord hath a Fée-simple qualified and the Donor a reversion in Fée but if the Lord enfeoffe the Donor now both Fée-simples are united and he hath but one Fée-simple in him â—â—ires female â—ill not take 2 When a man giveth lands to another man and the heirs female of his body dieth having issue a son a daughte◠〈◊〉 daughter shall inherit for the will of the donor the Stat. working 〈◊〉 it Co. ib. 24. b. 3 25. b. 3. 26. b. 4. which is upon the matter an act in law shall be observed but in case of a purchase it is otherwise for if A. have issue a son a daughter a lease for life is made the remainder to the heirs females of the body of A. A. dieth the heire female can take nothing because she is not heire for she must be both heire heire female which she is not because the brother is heire and therefore the will of the giver cannot be observed because here is no gift and therefore the Statute cannot work thereupon so it is if a man hath a son and a daughter and dieth lands are given to the daughter and the heirs female of the body of her father the daughter shall take nothing but an Estate for life because there is no such person she being not heire but where a gift is made to a man and to the heirs female of his body there the Donée being the first taker is capable by purchase and the heire female by discent secundam formam doni â—â—tes may 〈◊〉 altered 3 Regularly Estates cannot be altered from one to another Litt. §. 33. Co. ib. 28. a. unlesse all that have interest joine in the alteration thereof but by the Act of God estates may be changed without any act done by the parties that are interessed as if lands be given to a man and the heirs that he shall engender of the body of his wife here the wife hath nothing and the man is Tenant in special taile therefore in this Case if the Feme die without issue on her body begotten by the Baron the estate in special tail is by the act of God charged into tenancy in tail after possibility of issue extinct â—â—ging of â—â—tes 4 If a feofment in fee be made to the use of a man and his wife for the term
of their lives and after to the use of their next issue male in taile Co. ib. 28. a. 3. and after to the use of the Baron and Feme and the heires of their two bodies having no issue at that time in this Case the Baron and Feme are Tenants in special taile executed and after they have a son they are become Tenants for life the remainder to the son in tail the remainder to them in special taile and here albeit living the son they are but bare Tenants for life yet if the Baron die having no other issue and then the son die without issue the Feme shall be restored to the priviledges belonging to tenant in tail after possibility of issue extinct as appeares in Lewes Bowles Case Co. l. 11. fol. 80. for as there is said the Estate of the Feme in such Case is created by the act of God and not by the limitation of the party ex dispositione legis and not ex provisione hominis but if land be given to Baron and Feme and the heirs of their two bodies and after they are divorced causa praecontractus consanguinitatis or affinitatis their Estate of inheritance is turned to a joint Estate for life and albeit they had once an inheritance in them yet for that the Estate is altered by their own Act and not by the Act of God after the death of either of them without issue the other shall not be Tenant in tail after possibility of issue extinct 〈◊〉 not enâ—ed 5 If a man take an alien to wife and after the husband alien the land Co. ib. 33. a. 4. and then she is made denizen the husband dieth she shall not be endowed it is otherwise if she be naturalized by act of Parliament â—il death 6 The Feme shall not not be endowed after the Civil death of the Baron entring into Religion c. being the act of the party Co. ib. 33. b. 2. but after the natural death which is the Act of God â—t-tenant â—gnes doâ—â— 7 If two or more he joint-tenants of lands Co. ib. 34. b. 4. one of them may assigne dower to the wife of a third part in certainty and this shall bind his companions because they were compellable to do the same by law but if one of them assigne a rent out of the land to the wife this shall not bind his companions because he was not compellable by the law thereunto 8 There is a diversity betwéen particular Estates made by the Terre-tenant Co. ib. 57. b. 3. and paâ—â—â—cular Estates created by Act in Law Trespass before entry contrà For if Tenant pour autre 〈◊〉 continueth in possession after the decease of Cesty que vie or Tenant for yeares holdeth over his terme the Lessor cannot have an Action of Trespas before entry but if a Guardian after the full age of the heire continueth in possession he is no Tenant at sufferance but an Abator and against him an Assise of Mortancestor doth lie before entry Co. ib. 59. b 4. Armestrongs Case certified into the Chancery by Popham and others 39 Eliz. 9 Of fines due to the Lord by the Copi-holder Copi-hold Fines some by the change or alteration of the Lord and some by the change or alteration of the Tenant the change of the Lord ought to be by Act of God otherwise no fine can be due but by the change of the Tenant either by the Act of God or of the party a fine may be due For if the Lord do alleadge a Custome within his Mannor to have a fine of every of his Copi-holders of the said Mannor at the alteration or change of the Lord of the Mannor be it by alienation demise death or otherwise this is a Custome against the Law as to the alteration or change of the Lord by the act of the party for by that meanes the Copi-holders may be oppressed by multitude of fines by the Act of the Lord but when the change groweth by the Act of God there the Custome is good as by the death of the Lord but upon the Change or alteration of the Tenant a fine is due to the Lord. Escuage Co. ib. 72. b. 1. 10 If the Tenant goeth with the King in performance of his Knight-service and dieth in Exercitu in the Host or Army he is excused by Law and no escuage shall in that Case be demanded Homage Ancestral Co. ib. 102. a. 4 11 In Case of Homage Ancestral which is a special warranty in Law by the authority of Littl. the lands generally that the Lord hath at the time of the voucher shall be lyable to the execution in value whether he hath them by discent or purchase but in Case of an expresse warranty the heire shall be onely charged for such lands as he hath by discent from the same Ancestor who created the warranty and so note what priviledge this expresse warranty created by operation of Law hath more then the expresse warranty for firmior potentior est operatio Legis quam dispositio hominis Co. ib. 127. a. 1 in Beechers Case Co. l. 8. 60. b. 12 If a writ do a abate by the Act of the Demandant or Plaintiffe Amerâ—iaâ—â— or for matter of form the Demandant or Plaintiffe shall be amercied but if abate by the Act of God as by the death of one where there is two or the like there shall be no amerciament Co. ib. 148. a. 3 Wards Case cited in Co. l. 2. fol. 32. in Heywards Ca. 13 When a rent-charge is extinguished by the grantées purchase of part of the land the grantée shall never have a writ of annuity Rent-chaâ— extinguisheâ— no Annuity because it was by the grant a rent-charge and he hath discharged the land of it by his own Act viz. by purchase of part but if the rent-charge be determined by the Act of God or of the law yet the grantée may have a writ of annuity as if Tenant for another mans life by his déed grant a rent-charge to one for 21 yeares Cesty que vie dieth the rent-charge is determined and yet the grantée may have during the years a writ of annuity for the Arrerages incurred after the death of cesty que vie because the rent-charge did determine by the Act of God and by course of law Actus legis nulli facit injuriam The like law is if the land out of which the rent-charge is granted be recovered by an Eigne title and thereby the rent-charge is voided yet the grantée shall have a writ of annuity for that the rent-charge is avoided by the course of law Co. ib 148. b. 1 Litt. § 222. in Aschoughs ca. vide infrà 48. 14 Littleton saith that a Rent-service may be extinct for part Rent-serâ— suspended contrà and apportioned for the rest but it cannot be suspended in part by the Act of the party and in
esse for the other part for if there be Lord and Tenant of 40 acres of Land by fealty and 20 s. Rent if the Tenant make a Gift in tail or a lease for life or years of partel thereof to the Lord in this Case the Rent shall not be appoâ—tioned for any part but the Rent shall be suspended for the whole So it is also if the Lessor enter upon the Lessée for life or yeares into part and thereof disseise or put out the Lessée here the Rent is suspended in the whole and shall not be apportioned for any part and where outs Books speake of an apportionment in Case where the Lessor enters upon the Lessée in part they are to be understood where the Lessor enters lawfully as upon a surrender forfeiture or the like where the Rent is lawfully extinct in part yet by act in Law a Rent-service may be suspended in part and in esse for part as when the Guardian in Chivalry entreth into the land of his ward within age now is the Seigniory suspended but in this Case if the wife of the Tenant be endowed of a third part of the tenancy she shall pay to the Lord a third part of the tent so it is also where the Tenant gives a part of the tenancy to the father of the Lord in tail the father dieth and this descends to the Lord in this Case also by Act in Law the Seigniory is suspended in part and in esse for part And the same Law is of a Rent-charge which also cannot be apportioned but by Act in Law for if a man hath a rent-charge to him and his heirs issuing out of lands and he purchase part thereof Litt. § 222 224. in this Case the whole rent is extinct but if a man hath a Rent-charge and his father purchase part of the land out of which it issues in fée and die and that parcel descends to the son that hath the rent-charge in that Case the rent-charge shall be apportioned according to the value of the land 〈◊〉 charge 〈◊〉 because the part of land purchased by the father comes not to the son by his own Act but by descent and course of Law Co. ib. 149. b. 4 So also if the Tenant give the father of the grantée part of the land in tail and this descends to the grantée the rent shall be apportioned and so by act in Law a rent-charge may be suspended for one part and in esse for another or vice versa if the father vs grantée of a rent and the son purchase part of the land charged and the father dieth after whose death the rent descends to the son here also the rent shall be apportioned causa quà suprà â—â—nt-charge â—pationed 15 If the father within age purchase part of the Land charged Co. ib. 150. a. 2 and alieneth within age and dieth the son recovereth in a writ of dum flrit infra aetatem or entreth in this Case the Act of Law is mixt with the Act of the party and yet the rent shall be apportioned for after the recovery or entry the son hath the land by descent so it is also where the son recovereth part of the land upon an alienation by his father dum non fuit compos mentis for the cause afore-said 〈◊〉 16 A man seised of lands in fée takes wife Co. ibid. and makes a feofment in fée the feoffée grants a rent-charge of 10 l. out of the Land to the Feoffor and his wife and to the heltes of the husband the husband dieth the wife recovereth the moity for her dower by the custome the Rent-charge shall be apportioned and she shall distraine for five pound which is the moity of the rent and here albeit her owne act doth concurre with the Art in Law yet shall the Rent be apportioned â—d 〈…〉 Tenant 17 If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant Litt. §. 231. Co. ib. 152. and the Tenant holds of the Mesne by 5 s. rent and Mesne holds over of the Lord by 12 d. rent here the Mesne hath 4 s. rent in surplussage Now in this Case if the Lord purchase the tenancy The Mesne shall have the 4 s. yearely as rent secke and yet he shall distraine for it Litt. §. 232. Co. ib. 153. a. 1 vide infrà 40. for séeing the fealty is extinct the Law reserves the distresse to the Rent and the distresse in such Case shall by act in Law vs preserved Quia quando let aliquid a licui concedit concedere videtur id sicut quo res ipsa esse non potest And therefore if a man make a lease for life reserving a rent and bind himselfe in a Statute whereupon the Rent is extended and delivered to the Conusée here the Conusée shall distraine for the Rent because he cometh to it by course of law but if a rent-service be made a rent-seck by the grant of the lord the grantée shall not distrain for it for that the distresse in that case remaines with the fealty So likewise if there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the mesnalty is a Mannor having divers frée-holders and the Lord purchase one of the Tenancies and there is a Rent by surplussage this rent although it be changed into another nature is parcel of the Mannor yet by purchase of part of the land the whole Rent is extinct albeit the Law did preserve it Co. ib. 163. b. 4 18 There is a diversity betwéen a discent Discent and purchase which is an Act of the Law and a purchase which is an Act of the party for if a man be seised of lands in Fée having Issue two Daughters and one of the Daughters is attainted of felony the Father dieth both Daughters being alive the one moity shall discend to the one daughter and the other moity shall escheate But if a man make a Lease for life the remainder to the right heires of A. being dead who left issue two Daughters whereof the one is attainted of felony In this Case some have said that the remainder is not good for the moity but void for the whole because both the Daughters should have béen as Littleton saith but one heire Co. ib. 164. b. 3 19 A Rent-charge is intire and against Common right Rent-chargâ— dividable and yet it may be divided betwéen coperceners and by Act in law the Tenant of the land is subject to several distresses and in that Case also partition may be made before seisin of the Rent Co. ib. 165. a. 4 20 If there be two Coperceners of lands with warranty Coperceners and they make partition in this case the warranty shall remaine because they are compellable by law to make partition it is otherwise of join-tenants for they were not by the Common law compellable to make partition Co. Ib. 166. b. 3 21 When partition is made betwixt Coperceners Partition by
issue this warranty shall not barre the issue intail because this warranty did not discend to the issue in tail in regard the uncle of the issue himself was not bound to the warranty in his life time nor chargeable with it for that the Devise takes not effect until after his death Also if a man make a Feoffment in fée and bind his heires to Warranty this is void by the Warrant of this Maxime as to the heir because the Ancestor himself was not bound In like manner if a man bind his heires to pay a summe of money this is void And vice versa if a man bind himself to warranty and bind not his heires they are not bound Ego haeredes mei warrantizantibinius And Fleta saith Nota quod haeres non tenetur in Anglia ad debita antecessoris reddenda nisi per antecessorem ad hoc fuerit obligatus praeterquam debita Regis tantum A Fortiori in Case of warranty which is in the realty Howbeit the warranty in Law may bind the heir although it never bound the ancestor and this also may be created by a last will and testament As if a man devise lands to another for life or in tail reserving a rent the Devisée for life or in tail shall take advantage of this warranty in Law albeit the antestor was not bound and such a Devise shall also bind his heires to warranty albeit they are not named Co. l. 1. 83. b. Corbets Case 10 If a man covenant to stand seised to the use of himself for life An Estate to cease to one and to be in another repugnant the remainder to A. in tail the remainder to B. in tail c. Provided that if any of the remainders in tail shall resolve to alien that then the Estate of him so resolving should cease as if he were naturally dead and that it should then go to him in the next remainder here this Proviso is void and against Law for the repugnancie for by the words or act of the partie an Estate cannot be limited to cease as to one Ibid. 86. b. 4. 87 a. 4. per Walmesley and from thence-forth to be in another For if a man make a Lease for life upon condition that if he do not pay 20 l. such a day that another shall have the Land this future limitation is void also if a man make a feoffment in Fée of Land to the use of A. and his heires every Monday and to the use of B. and his heires every Tuesday and to the use of C. and his heires every Wednesday these limitations are void and we find no such fractions of Estates in the Law And if Co-perceners agrée to present by Turn this is a partition as to the Possession yet neverthelesse they shall in a writ of Right So also partition that one of them shall have the land from Easter to Lammas and the other from Lammas to Easter in severalty this is good as to the possession and taking of the profits but it is no severance of the Estate of Inheritance Howbeit an act of Parliament or the Common Law may make an Estate void as to one and good as to another but a man by his words and the breath of his mouth cannot do it As if Land be given to Baron and feme and the heires of their two bodies and the Baron levie a fine with Proclamations and hath issue and dies now this fine by force of the Statute of 32 H. 8. 36. shall barre the issue in tail but shall not bind the feme and so in respect of one it is a good barre and in respect of another no bâ—rre Also in a Praecipe if one be vouched here as to the Demandant the Vouchée is Tenant and a Release to him by the Demandant is good but as to a stranger he is not Tenant and therefore a Release to him by a stranger is void in like manner if one hath a Term for yeares as Executor and surrender it here in one respect the Term is extinct but in another it is Assets So that an act of Parliament or the Law may do that in such Cases which a man by his words cannot do Co. l. 4. 1. b. 3. in Vernons Case 11 No collateral satisfaction or recompence made to the Feme Dower assigâ—ed either before or after marriage in liew of her Dower was any barre of her dower at the common law before the Stat. of 27 H. 8. 10. albeit after the death of her husband she entred thereinto and accepted thereof in recompence of her dower because by the marriage she being entitled to a fréehold for life that title shall not afterwards be barred by any collateral satisfaction Howbeit dower ad ostium Ecclesiae or ex assensu patris shall conclude her of her dower if she enter into the land so assigned after the death of her husband for the law doth allow these being made in such form as the law requires those kinds of dower to be made It is otherwise where the dower is made by the Act of party as aforesaid The principal Case there And therefore if B. enfeoffes to the use of himselfe for life remainder of his wife for life upon condition to perform his last will and for her jointure albeit after the death of her husband she accepts thereof yet she is not bound by it â—â—â—nt-tenants â—etition 12 If two joint-tenants since the Stat. of 31 H. 8. 1. Co. l. 6. 12. b. Morrices Case which gives them a writ of partitione facienda do make a partition by déed with consent albeit they are now compellable by that Statute to make partition yet because they do not pursue the Stat. to make partition by the writ such partition remaines at the common law and so by consequent the warranty originally annexed to their Estate is gone but if they make partition by writ provided by the Stat. to which every one being party none can have any wrong by the operation thereof the warranty shall remaine notwithstanding such partition in severalty because the first is by the act of the parties but the other is operation of the Statute which is an act in law so also if there be two joint-tenants with warranty and the one disseise the other and the disseisée brings an Assise here albeit the Plaintiff pray recovery in severalty yet he shall recover generally and in this Case also the warranty shall be preserved because he recovers by course of Law and with this agrées 28 lib. Ass Pl. 35. and Sir Edw. Coke also ubi suprà albeit there be some Bookes that he shall have judgment to hold in severalty as 10 E. 3. 40. 10. Ass Pl. 17. Tâ—e Shewing 〈◊〉 a Deed â—â—â—a 13 When a déed is requisite to be had ex institutione juris C. l. 6. 38. b. 2. Bellamies Ca. it ought to be shewed in Court although it concerne a
thing collaterall and transfers or convey nothing as if the Major and Cominalty of London have an Estate for the life of I. S. if in this Case the Major and Cominalty attorne to the grantée of the reversion the law requires that it shall be by déed for notwithstanding that the grantée comes not in by them that attorne and that the attornment is but a bare consent yet in pleading the déed of Attornment ought to he shewed for in such Case the déed is requisite ex constitutione Legis but when a déed is onely requisite ex provisione hominis in such Case the provision of a man shall not charge the judgement of the law as if a man make a lease for years of land to A. upon condition that he shall not assigne it over but by déed and not by parol in this Case ex provisione hominis the assignement ought to be by déed yet because ex constitutione legis the déed is not necessary for the assignée he may plead the assignement without shewing the déed â—â—render â—arranty â—â—â—â—ment 14 Fortior aequior est dispositio legis quà m hominis Co. l. 6. 69. b. 3 in Sir Mâ—ile Finches Case and therefore he that hath a future interest cannot surrender it by any expresse surrender but by taking of a new lease which is an Act and amount to a surrender in law it may be surrendâ—ed and determined as it is held in 35 H. 6. c. vide suprà cap. 5. So if the father be enfeoffed in Fée and the Feoffor warrant the land to him and his heires here the assignée shall not vouch but if the father enfeoffe his sonne and heire apparent with warranty and die in this Case the heire being in truth assignée shall vouch for the law which hath determined the warranty of the father to the son will give the son benefit of the first warranty as it was adjudged in 43 E. 3. 5. by which it appeareth that the act in law is both more strong and more equal The principal Case therein effect then the Act of the party can be So also if A. Lessée for 50 yeares demiseth to B. for 10 yeares and then the reversioner levies a fine to B. and his heires who enfeoffes D. who outs B. and B. re-enters upon D. here the entry of B. is a good attornment in Law and stronger then an expresse attornment Co. l. 8. 82. a. 3 in Vivyors ca. 15 Albeit a man be bound in an Obligation to stand to abide c. Authorities revocable an Atbitrament yet he may contermand it For a man cannot by his owne Act make such an authority power or warrant as shall not be countermandable which by the Law and in its one nature is countermandable as if I make a Letter of Attorney to make livery or to sue an Action in my name or if I assigne Auditors to take an accompt or if I make one my Factor or submit to an Arbitrament albeit these are made by expresse words irrevocable or if I bind my selâ—e that they shall stand irrevocably yet they may be revoked So if I make my last Will Irrevocable yet I may afterwards revoke it For my Act or my Words can not alter the judgment of Law and make that irrevocable which of its owne nature is revocable Co. l. 10. 67. b. 2 in the Church wardens of St. Saviour in Southwarke their Case 16 The Church-wardens of St. Saviour in South-warke having a Lease of the Rectory almost expired contracted Surrenders 〈◊〉 Law that the Church-wardens then having and possessing the said Rectory would pay 20 l. fine and surrender the old Letters Patents to the King and in consideration thereof a new lease should be granted them They paid the 20 l. fine delivered into the Chancery the Letters Patents and discharged the fées there but did not take care that the Letters Patents were â—acated and yet the King was not deceived in his grant but the lease adjudged good For it was a good surrender in Law because albeit the lessées were a corporation aggregate of many and could not make an expresse surrender without déed in writing under their seale yet they may by Act in Law surrender their term without any writing So if the Prior without the consent of the Covent make a lease for yeares rendring Rent if the Prior by déed expressely release the rent and die the Successor shall recover the arrerages but if the Prior out the lessée and die this discharge in law shall discharge the rent that incurred during the Outer against the Successor as appears in 34 H. 6. 21. Co. l. 1â— 80. b. 4 in Lewes Bowles Case 17 The Estate of a Tenant in Taile after possibility Tenant is taile after possibility â— c. ought to be a Râ—maine and residue of an Estate Taile and this by the Act of God and not by the limitation of the party ex dispositione Legis and not ex provisione hominis and therefore if a man make a Gift in Taile upon Condition that if he do such an Act that he shall then have it but for life he is not Tenant in Taile after possibility c. for this is ex provisione hominis and not ex dispositione Legis but it ought to be the remaine and residue of an Estate Taile and that by the Act of God and the Law viz. by the death of one of the Donées without issue And therefore if Tenants in special taile recover in an Assise and after one of them die without issue and afterwards he that survives who is Tenant in taile after possâ—bility is re-disseised he shall have re-disseisin for the francktenement which he had before for it is parcel of the Estate taile Vid. sup Case 4. Co. l. 8. 152 a. 2 Edw. Althams Case 18 If the Disseisée release all Actions to the heire of the disseisor thereby his right is gone in judgment of Law Release of right for when a man hath not any other meane to come by his Land but onely by way of Action if he release all Actions by such release his right is Inclusive in Iudgement of Law gone because by his own Act he hath barred himselfe of all meanes and remedies to recover or attain thereunto but if the heire of the Disseisorâ— make a Lease for life the remainder in fée and the disseisée release to the Tenant for life all actions which he hath against him and after Tenant for life die the disseisée shall have an action notwithstanding such release against him in remainder for he did but release the action and the act in law will never extend the act of the party more largely then his expresse words as if the Lord disseise his Tenant and make a lease for life this release in law shall not entend farther then for the life of the lessée for true it is Fortior potentior est dispositio Legis quà m
hominis and it is as true Fortior aequior est dispositio Legis quà m hominis â—nt-tenants â—enants in Common Coperceners â—resentation â—dvowson 19 A joint-tenant or Tenant in common shall not have a Quare Impedit for the advowson which they have in jointure or in common F.N. B. 34. v. in Case one of them present alone against his companion that so presents but if two Coperceners cannot agrée in presenting the eldest sister shall have the first presentation and so shall also he have that hath her Estate and if either of them be disturbed by the other Copercener either of them shall have a Quare Impedit against the other sister And Coperceners and those who have their Estates shall present as Coperceners ought to do viz. the eldest first and then the second after her the third and so the rest in order according to their ages and the diversity betwéen joint-tenants or tenants in common and Coperceners ariseth from this ground because they are in by grant which is the act of the party but these are originally in by act in law 20 If an Abbot make waste in the Lands which he hath in ward F.N.B. 60. m. and dies the Successor shall not be charged therewith because his death is the Act of God it is otherwise if he be deposed for then the Successor shall be chargable with it because that is the Act of the party â—â—d Mesne 〈◊〉 Tenant â—rnment 21 If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant Co. Inst p. 1. 221. b. 4. Litt. §. 583. and the Lord grant by fine the services of his Tenant to another in fée here if the services of the Mesne be arreare the grantée shall not distraine the Tenant before attornment Howbeit if the grantée die without heire whereby the mesnalty escheats to the Lord Paramount in that Case if the services of the Mesnalty be arreare the Lord Paramount may distraine the Tenant without attornment because the grantée came to the mesnalty by the act of the party but the Lord Paramount comes to it by Act in Law 〈◊〉 entry in 〈◊〉 more adâ—tageous 〈◊〉 an entry 〈◊〉 Deed. 22 An actual entry into land is meerely the Act of the party Co. ib. 253. b. 4 and therefore is called an entry in déed and albeit a claime be also an Act of the party yet it is also mixt with force of Law and therefore it is called an Entry in Law and is not onely as forcible as an Entry in Déed but because it is as well an Act of Law as of the party it giveth the party a greater priviledge then an Entry in Déed doth for a continual claime of the Disseisée being an Entry in Law shall vest the possession and seisin in him for his advantage but never for his disadvantage and therefore if the Disseisée bring an Assise and hanging the Assise he make continual claime this shall not abate the Assise but he shall recover damages from the beginning but it is otherwise of an Entry in Déed â—â—nce in 〈◊〉 23 Vpon a Lease for yeares by indenture Dier 6. 28 H. 8. 1. c. the Lessée covenants and grants that if he his Executors or Assignes alien it shall be lawfull for the Lessor to re-enter and after he makes his Wife Executrix and dies the Feme takes a new husband who aliens In this Case some hold there is no breach of the Condition because the Baron is in by the Law and not Assignée of the Lessee as it is of Tenant by the Courtesie or Lord of a Villein but others hold the contrary ideo quaere Dier 45. 3. 31 H. 8. 24 A lease is made for term of yeares Devise of a Lease upon Condition that if the Lessée during his life assigne the term to any other without the Assent of the Lessor that then the Lessor may re-enter and the Lessée devised his term by his will to another without Assent c. And by Brooke and Hales this is a forfeiture because the Devisée shall be said to be in by the assignement that the Divisor made during his life but if the Executors had enjoyed the term that had béen no forfeiture because in that Case the Law makes the assignement Tamen quaere Co. Inst p. 1. 310. b. 3. 25 If a reversion of land be granted to an Alien by déed Attornment and before attornment the Alien is made denizen and then the attornment is made In this Case the King upon office found shall have the land for as to the Estate betwéen the parties it passeth by déed ab initio it is otherwise where land is granted to a mâ—n and a woman and they intermarie and then attornment is had for which Vide suprà Pl. 1. Dier 60. 22 23 36 H. 8. 26 There is a diversity Seisure of a villein where the body of a man in execution is set at liberty by authority of Law and when without authority as by the voluntary escape in a Sheriffe or the like For the Law saves all rights as in Case of a Villein to whom the Kings presence is a Sanctuary where the Lord cannot seise him howbeit afterwards out of his presence he may because the Law gives the Villain that priviledge pro tempore but if the Lord himselfe enfranchise him by manumission in déed or in Law for one hower he is frée for ever in favorem libertatis because that is the Act of the Lord himselfe So if a man be taken in execution and be suffered to escape by the Sheriffe this is an absolute discharge of the debt and the Plaintiffe is to have his remedy against the Sheriffe by action of debt Arrest of a Member of Parliament But if a Member of Parliament be arrested by a Sheriffe upon an execution and be afterwards fréed by the priviledge which the law gives him that is no discharge of the debt but that when he ceaseth to be a Member he may be arrested again upon the same judgement c. Dier 68. 24. in Kidwelleys Case 4 5 E. 6. 27 Where demand of Rent is to be made by the law as when no place is assigned for the payment thereof Demand of Rent the law it selfe is the place there it is not sufficient for the party to come to the land ad petendum redditum but he ought to bring witnesses with him and in their presence ought to make an expresse demand of the Rent upon the land as to say here I am and do demand such a Rent or the like albeit none be there present to pay the Rent But when the Rent is by the agréement of the parties payable out of the land the Lessor is not bound to demand it but the lessée is to tender it at his peril Dier 140. Pl. 39. 3 4 P. M. 28 A thing or action personal being once suspended though it be but for an hower is
like the Law imputeth it to the Laches and folly of the grantée that he will not perform the Condition while he may and believeth against him these and the like things done to his owne prejudice Co. l. 3. 65. b. 2. in Penuants Case 32 If he that hath a Rent-service or Rent-secke â—cquittance the last Rent accept the Rent due at the last day and thereof make an acquittance all the arrearages due before are thereby discharged and so it was adjudged betwixt Hopkins and Merton in that Common Place H. Rot. 950. Vide 10 El. Dier 271. But there the Case is left at large with this also agrées 11 H. 4. 24. 1 H. 5 7 6. But note that the barre to the avowrie ought to be with conclusion of judgment Si encounter cest fait d'acquittance il doit faire Avowry as appeares by the Record of 10 El. and he ought not to demand judgment si action Co. ib. 66. a. 4. 33 If there be Lord and Tenant by Knight-service A extance shall lose thâ— ward and the Tenant enfeoffe his son and heire within age by Collusion In this Case if the Lord accept the services by the hands of the feoffée he shall lose the ward for the Statute of Malbridge cap. 6. making such feofment by Collusion void and of no effect as to the Lord if the Lord will affirm the feofment and waive the benefit of that act by acceptance of the feoffée for his Tenant he shall thereby purge the collusion and therefore deserveth to lose the ward Co. l 4. 1. a. 2 b. 4. Vernous Case 34 B. enfeoffes to the use of himselfe for life jointure in hew of dower remainder to his wife for life with Condition to perform his last will and for her jointure and dies the wife enters agrées to it and after brings her writ of dower In this Case if after the death of the husband the wife accept of that conditional Estate such acceptance shall barre her from having dower for albeit dower at the Common Law in liew whereof a jointure is granted be an absolute Estate for life yet in as much as an Estate for life upon Condition is an Estate for life it is within the words and intent of the Statute of 27 H. 8. 10. to barre the wife of her dower if after the death of her husband she accept thereof So if the husband enfeoffe to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to the use of his wife durante viduitate for her jointure this is an Estate to her for life and cannot determine without her own Act and therefore a jointure also within the Statute if after the husbands death she accept thereof Co. l. 4 9. b. 2. in Bevils Ca. 35 If there be Lord and Tenant by fealty and Rent Rent-service made Rent-secke and the Lord grant over the fealty saving the Rent or if a man make a gift in taile or lease for life rendring Rent and grant over the reversion except the Rent in these Cases the nature of the Rent is altered by the parties owne Act and therefore the ancient seisin when it was Rent-service will not in such case suffice because by his own act the nature of the Rent is changed neither can he have for it an Assise as of a Rent-secke because he was never seised of any such Rent Co. l. 4. 11. b 2. in Bevils Ca. 36 If there be Lord and Tenant by fealty and two shillings Rent Rent by incroachment and the Lord by encroachment viz. by the voluntary payment of the Tenant happens seisin of more Rent then he ought to have the Tenant shall not in avowry avoid such seisin had by accroachment unlesse it be in some special Cases which sée ubi suprà â—â—â—ges irâ—â—â—able 37 If A. hath Rent-service or Rent-charge in fée or for life Co. l. 4. 50. b. 4. in Andrew Ogwels Case and the Rent is arreare and after A. grants over the Rent to another and the Tenant attornes and after A. dies his Executors are not within the branch of the Statute of 32 H. 8. 37. which gives power to Executors c. to recover Debt due to the Testator at the time of his death for by the grant over the arrecages were lost and were not due to the Testator at the time of his death And therefore when the Testator by his own Act in his life time had dispenced with the arrerages the said Act gives no remedy to recover them â—il revolâ— by maâ—e 38 If a Feme sole make a Will and after take Baron Co. l. 4. 61. a. 4. in Forse and Hemblings ca. this is a revocation thereof for the making of a Will is but the Inception thereof and it takes not any effect until the death of the Devisor because omne Testamentum morte consummatum est voluntas est ambulatoria usque ad extremum vitae exitum And therefore it being no perfect Will when she takes Husband and after marriage her Will being her Husbands and subject to it by taking Husband she hath wholy revoked the Will formerly made â—â—vise â—y â—â—â—nder 39 A. deviseth Land to B. till 800 l. be raised for the preferment of his daughters A. dies C. being heire conceales the Will Co. l 4. 82. b. 3. Sir Andrew Corbets Case and enters In this Case B. shall have allowance for the time that the Will was concealed and that time shall not be accompted parcel of the time for the levying of the money But if B. had surrendred to C. upon Condition and had entred for the Condition broken Co. l. 5. 13. b. 3. in the Countesse of Shrewesberies ca. that should have béen accounted parcel of the time for that was his own Act. 〈◊〉 40 At the Common Law before the Statute of Glocester cap. 5. 6 E. 1. no remedy lay for waste either voluntary or permissive against Lessée for life or yeares because the Lessée hath Interest in the Land by the Act of the Lessor and it was his folly to make such a lease and not to restraine him by covenant condition or otherwise from making waste And for the same reason it is that at this day Tenant at will shall not be punished for permissive waste but for voluntary waste he may according to Littleton fol. 15. 〈◊〉 â—â—â—der 41 A. demiseth the Mannor of D. to B. for 30 years Co. lib. 5â— 11. Ives Case except the under wood growing upon it and after demiseth the underwood to him for 62 years without impeachment of waste afterwards B. accepts a lease of 30 yeares of the Mannor after the exspiration of the first 30 yeares In this Case because the demise of the underwood did not sever it from the Mannor the intire franktenement notwithstanding such demise remaining still in the Lessor by his acceptance of the last lease for 30 years the former two leases were
carelesse and reserved none Co. ib. 253. a. 4 4 Remedies for rights are alwayes favourably extended Rights favoâ—rably extended and therefore the grantée of a Rent-charge and Rent-secke may demand them after they are behind at any time whether the Tenant be present or no and it is not necessary that the grantée should demand them at the very time when they become due It is otherwise of a Rent upon a Condition because that is penal and overthroweth the whole Estate and therefore the time of demand in that Case must be certain to the end the Lessée Donée or Feoffee may be there to pay the Rent for the redemption of the Estate Litt. §. 307. Co. ib. 194. b. 3 Litt. §. 308. 5 If a man be disseised Release to one joint-tenant and the Disseisor make feofment to two men in Fée and the Disseisée releaseth by his déed to one of the feoffées in this Case it shall enure to both the Feoffees because they have a Rightfull Estate by Law and come not in by wrong done to any So likewise if the Disseisor make a lease to one for life the remainder to another in Fée and the Disseisée release to the Tenant for life this shall enure to him in remainder and the Estate of the Disseisée is thereby quite extinct causa qua suprà Co. ib. 125. b. 3 6 The Statutes of 3 4 E. 6. cap. 4. and 13 El. cap. 6. Constat iâ—speximus which ordain Constats and Inspeximus of letters Patents are to be favourably construed for advancement of the â—emedy and right of the subject â—â—gment acâ—â—ding to 〈◊〉 7 Estopels Co. ib. 227. a. 4 which bind the Interest of the Land as the taking of a lease of a mans owne land by déed indented and the like being specially found by the Iury the Court ought to judge according to the special matter for albeit Estoples regularly must be pleaded and relied upon by an apt conclusion and the Iury is sworne ad veritatem dicendam yet when they find veritatem facti they pursue well their oath and the Court ought to judge according to Law and right So also may the Iury find a warranty being given in evidence though it be not pleaded because it bindeth the right except it be in a writ of Right when the Mise is joyned upon the méere right â— 33 H. 8. 〈◊〉 8 Albeit the Statute of 32 H. 8. 33. Co. ib. 238. a. 3 which gives entry to the Disseisée or his heires if the Disseisor were not in peaceable possession five yeares before the discent cast be a penal Statute yet it is taken favourably for the advancement of the ancient right For whether the disseisin be with force or without force it is within the Statute and albeit the Statute speaketh of him that at the time of the discent had title of Entry c. or his heires yet the Successors of bodies Politique or Corporal so you hold your selfe to a disseisin are within the remedy of this Statute but an Abator Intrudor or the Feoffée or Disseisor are not within the Statute nor he in reversion or remainder that had not right of Entry at the time of the discent cast â—ery discent â—â—i not toll â—â—y 9 Albeit the Law giveth much favour to descents Litt. §. 394. Co. ib. 241. b. 2 yet when the title of a discent commenceth by wrong for the advancement of the ancient right the Law tieth a discent to strict termes and therefore when a discent is cast if immediately after there be not a person capable of it which may take it such discent cannot toll the entry of him that right hath but his Entry is congeable As if a Feme be seised of land in Fée wherein I have title of Entry and the Feme takes Baron and they have issue and after the Feme dies seised and after the Baron dies and the issue enters c. In this Case I may enter upon the possession of the issue because the issue comes not to the tenement immediately by discent after the death of his mother but by the death of his father For here was but a discent of a reversion at the time of the dying seised so as the Fée and franktenement together did not immediately after the decease of the Feme discend to the heire and if a dying seised taketh not away the Entry of him that right hath at the time of the discent it shall not do it by any matter ex post facto So if a Disseisor die without heire his Wife priviment enseint with an issue and after the issue is borne who entreth into the land In this Case he hath the land by discent and yet thereby the Entry of the Disseisée shall not be taken away because as Littleton saith the issue cometh not to the lands immediately by discent after the decease of his father Likewise if a Disseisor make a gift in taile the remainder in Fée and the Donée dieth without issue leaving his Wife priviment enseint with a sonne and he in the remainder enter and after the sonne is borne who entreth into land this discent shall not take away the entry of the Disseisée causa qua suprà â—cent tols 〈◊〉 tâ—try 10 B. Tenant in taile enfeoffeth A. in Fée Co. Inst p. 1. 246. a. 2. A. hath issue within age and dieth B. abateth and dieth seised the issue of A. being still within age this discent shall bind the infant for the issue in taile is remitted And the Law doth more respect an ancient right in this Case then the priviledge of an Infant that had but a defeasible Estate â—cent upon â—ession no 〈◊〉 11 No glorious pretext of an Act who though it be of Religion shall work a wrong to a stranger that hath right Co. ib. 248. b. 3 to barre him of his entry but it must be done by the Act of God viz. by death and therefore if the Disseisor have issue and enter into Religion such a descent shall not barre by the disseisée of his entry but he may well enter notwithstanding any such profession or pretext of Religion Litt. §. 417. Co. ib. 252. a. 4 12 If a man hath cause of entry into divers lands in several Townes in the same County if he enter in any parcel thereof in the name of all Entry how be done by such entry he shall obtaine a good possession and seisin of all The like also may be said of Livery of seisin and this is in favour of right and Iustice Litt. §. 472. Co. ib. 275. b. 4 13 If a man diseised by two and he releaseth to one of them he Release to Disseisors to whom the release is made shall hold out his Companion and by such release shall gaine the sole possession and Estate in the land but if a Disseisor enfeoffe two in Fée and the Disseisée
and part against him or all or part against one of the Tenants or Defendants and nothing or but part against the other the Demandant or Plaintiff shall be amercied except no default be found in the Demandant or Plaintiff And therefore in Trespasse of Battery against Baron and Feme supposing the Battery to be done by both and the Feme is onely found guilty c. and the Baron acquit yet the Plaintiff shall not be amercied for the Plaintiff cannot have any other Writ in such case and therefore because no default was found in him he shall not be amercied in this case The Kings ward dyes before homage 42. The Kings Tenant in Capite under age is to remaine in Ward Co. l. 8. 172. a. Hales case Prerogativa Reg. cap. 3. and the King is to receive the profits of his land untill he do his homage and that cannot be untill he have sued out his Livery And if at his full age he tender his Livery he is to have three moneths to perfect it Howbeit if after such tender by the Act of God viz. death he is prevented to perfect it the King shall not receive the profits after such tender but the next heire shall have them and after such tender he might in that case sell the Land or any part thereof and the sale shall be good notwithstanding the Kings hands upon it Co. l. 9. 87. a. 4. in Pinchons case 43. It is a Rule in Law Where wager of Law in the Testator Executors not chargeable that where the Testator might have waged his Law his Executors shall not be charged with that duty contra because that advantage is lost by the act of God viz. by death and therefore shall not be imputed to any default of his So debt lyeth not against Executors for the dyet of their Testator because he might in that case have waged his Law and so have freed himselfe thereof which advantage being lost by his death and no fault of his his Executors who represent his person shall not be prejudiced thereby Howbeit if a Prisoner in the Tower for treason receive his diet of the Lievtenant and dye the Lievtenant shall have an Action of debt against his Executors for such diet of the Testator and the reason is because in that case the Testator could not in his life time have waged his Law as it is adjudged in 27 H. 6. 4. b. in Thomas Bodulgats case And the reason why no wager of Law lyeth in such case is because every Goaler ought to keep his Prisoner in salva arcta custodiae and so must of necessity finde him victualls c. Vide pl. ibid. Co. ibid. 87. b. 4. 44. In 14 H. 6. 19. b. R. G. brings a Writ of debt of ten marks against T.T. and others Executors of W. W. and counted The like that the Testator had retained the Plaintiff to be with him for a yeare in the art of limming of Books paying him ten marks per annum and there Martin held that the Action of the Executors was not maintainable And he took a difference betwixt this case of a Limmer and that of a common Labourer for a Labourer shall be compelled to labour and his salary is put in certaine by the Statute and therefore there is no reason that the Servant should lose by the death of his Master being bound by the Law to serve which shall not be said to be his default but the Act of God and the Law Howbeit in the case of a Limmer he was not compelled by the Law to serve And so when he made the Covenant it was his owne act and folly and no act in Law and he might have taken a Specialty And this is good Law but the true reason of that difference is because in the Case of a common Labourer the Testator could not wage his Law but in that of a Limmer he might c. Vide pl. ibid. Co l. 10. 76 b. 2. in the case of the Marshalsey 45. If the Court of Common Bench in Plea of debt award a Writ of Capias against a Duke Earle Erroneous arrests c. which by the Law lyes not against them and this appeares in the Writ it selfe yet if the Sheriff arrest them by force of the Capias albeit the Writ is against Law neverthelesse the Court having Iurisdiction of the cause the Sheriff shall be excused because there is no default in him but in the Court and with this accords 38 H. 8. Dyer 60. b. So it is likewise if a Iustice of Peace makes a warrant to arrest one for Felony who is not indicted albeit the Iustice ers in the Warrant yet he that makes the arrest by force of that Warrant shall not be punished by a Writ of False Imprisonment because is is not his fault but the Iustices who is Iudge of the cause and with this agrees 14 H. 4 16. Co. l. 11. 27. a 3 in Henry Pigots case 46. If the Obligee himselfe alter the Obligation in any point materiall or not materiall by interlining addition racing or the like An Obligation void or not void by rasure c. that shall make the Obligation void but if a stranger do it without the Obligees privity in a point not materiall that shall not avoid the Deed as if an Obligation be to be made to the Sheriff for apparance c. and in the Obligation after the sealing and delivery thereof these words Vicecom Comit. Oxon are interlined by a stranger without the privity of the Sheriff yet the Obligation remaines good notwithstanding such interlining by a stranger without the Obligees privity in regard it was not conceived to be a point materiall Benedicto Winchcombe his name and sirname being there inserted before and being done by a stranger it shall not in that case prejudice the Obligee Refusall of Clerk 47. Where the Bishop refuseth the Clerke of the Patron for non-ability or crime he shall not present by Laps F. N. B. 35. i. unlesse he have first given notice to the Patron of the insufficiency of his Clerk the Patron neglect to present within the six moneths for in such case after the six months past the Patron shall have a Writ to the Bishop if the Church be void and the Bishop have not in the meane time collated 48. If one sell another a peice of Cloath and warrant it to be of a certaine length in this case if the peice be not of that length F. N. B. 98. k. a Writ of Disceit lyeth against the Vendor albeit the Warranty be but by Parol Custome of Woad uncertaine by tempest 49. In Fogassaes case in the Coment Pl. Com. â— b. 1. in Fogassaes case the storme at Sea being a thing that could by no possible meanes be prevented and that causing the uncertainty of the quantity of the Woad and there being no meanes of knowing the certainty thereof
before it should be landed and weighed and that uncertainty being caused by no folly in the Defendant Fogassa there was great reason he should be excused and not made lyable to forfeit the Woad albeit he had not observed the strict words of the Statute in that case Rent-charge pro consilio impendendo 50. If a man hath a Rent-charge granted him Pro consilio impendendo Dyer 2. 2. 6 H. 8. and afterwards he is attainted of Treason and cast into Prison so as the Grantor cannot have accesse to him for his counsell yet he shall have the Rent during his Imprisonment for he may give counsell as well in Prison as at large and there is no fault in him that the Grantor came not at him A Sheep-biter 51. If a man hath a Dog that kills Sheep Dyer 25. b. 163. 28 H. 8. the Master of the Dog being ignorant of the Dogs condition he shall not be punished for it It is otherwise if he had notice of the Dogs condition and quality for then it may be imputed to his own folly and neglect See also Dyer 29. 195. 28 H. 8. Repaire of River-bankes 52. A Lease was made of a Meadow bordering upon the River of Exe in Devon by Deed indented Dyer 33 10. 22 29 H. 8. and the Lessee covenanted to sustaine and repaire the Banks of the River in paine of ten pounds and afterwards by reason of a sudden floud upon subversion of certaine Weares in Devon the Banks were decayed and perished c. and by the opinion of Fitz. and Shelley the Lessee shall be excused from the Penalty as if it had been of an House that had been burnt by lightning or thrown down by tempest which are the act of God and cannot be resisted Howbeit in this case he ought to repaire the Banks in convenient time Act of God 53. A man makes a Lease for years of Land and a stock of Sheep Dyer 56. 15. 35 H. 8. rendring rent and all the Sheep dye In this case the rent shall be apportioned because it was the act of God and no default or neglect of the Lessee Bond eaten with Mice 54. In debt upon an Obligation Dyer 59. a. 12. 36. H 8. if after non est factum pleaded and entred the Labels by the negligence of the Clerke are eaten off with Mice it seems this shall not prejudice the Obligee because it did not happen by his default Descent a totall Entry 55. A man being beyond Sea out of the Realme is disseised Dyer 143. 57. 3 4. P. M. and after he returnes into the Realme and then departs out againe during which time there is a Descent cast In this case if it cannot be proved that he had notice of the Disseisin when he was in the Realme it seemes this Entry is not taken away for by intendment of Law he could not have notice of the Disseisin at the time when it was done So if an Infant be disseised and at his full age he goes beyond Sea or takes Baron or is imprisoned during which time there is a Descent his Entry shall be taken away for this Laches after his full age but if he were within age when he did such an act it shall be otherwise Dyer 241 50 8 El. 56. Undue practise A Capias ad satisfaciendum returnable Tres Trin. being not served the Solicitor of the Plaintiff takes it againe of the Sheriff and one of the Prothonotaries Clerks makes the Tres Trin. Tres Mich. and then the Solicitor re-delivers it to the Sheriff unsealed viz. to the Sheriff of London who makes Warrant thereupon to a Serjeant who arrests the Defendant and afterwards the Writ is sealed And in this case albeit the offenders for this undue practise were committed to the Fleet yet afterwards it appearing upon examination that the Plaintiff was ignorant of the practise the Writ was received and the Defendant committâ—d also to the Fleet in execution Dyer 260. 24. 9 Eliz. 57. Partition against two the one confesses the Partition Partition and the other pleads to Issue and in the Record of Nisi prius the name of the Defendant was omitted by the negligence of the Clerk being written praedictus similiter without more Also the Iury was betwixt the Plaintiff and both the Defendants whereas one of them was not party to the Issue which errors being apparent were amended by the dirâ—ction of the Iustices of Nisi prius quod nota and so the Iury taken Dyer 318. 10. 15. El. 58. The Earle of Kent being reputed but an Esquire The Earle of Kent brings a Writ of Entry by the name of Esquire and the Pannell was returned now by the Heralds he was then newly declared Earle and thereupon he challenged the Array because there was no Knight in the Pannell but it was not allowed for that there was no default in the Sheriff he being commonly reputed an Esquire 150. Nemo debet rem suam sine facto vel defâ—ctu suo amittere Litt. S. 442. Co. Inst pars 1. 262. b. 1. If a man be disseised and he arraigne an Assize against the Disseisor and the Recognitors of the Assize chaunt for the Plaintiff An Assize and the Iustices of Assize will be advised of their Iudgement untill the next Assize c. and in the Interim the Disseisor dyes seised In this case this dying seised shall not toll the Entry of the Disseisee because the bringing of the Assize amounted to a continuall claime and Nemo debet rem suam sine facto vel defectu suo amittere Note that this is a Quaere in Littleton but is since adjudged for good Law Vide supra M. 149. Ex. 17. Litt. S. 443. Co. ibid 263. b. 1. c. 2. If an Abbot dye and during the vacation Descent tolls not Entry a man tortiously enters into part of the Land belonging to the Monastery and dyes thereof seised and afterwards a new Abbot is elected this Descent shall not toll the Entry of the new elected Abbot because this Entry and Descent was not occasioned by any act or default of or in the new Abbot the Land being during the vacation in abayance and custody of the Law and for that by the death of the former Abbot which is the act of God there was no person able to make continuall claime This is also a Quaere in Litt. It is so likewise of Dean and Chapter Mayor and Comonalty Master and Fellowes of a Colledge or any other Corporation aggregate of many where such a Descent happens when they want their head viz. Dean Mayor Mastor c. for then they are not in a capacity to make claime Also if an Vsurpation to a Church be had in time of Vacation this shall not prejudice the Successor to put him out of Possession but that at the next avoydance he shall present Litt. S.
Law since the making of the same Act did in the said 12 year of E. 4. give judgment that in such case an estate tail should be barred And in Scholasticaes case in 12 Eliz. Pl. Com. 403. it was not thought fit to stand with the honour and gravity of the Court that the question concerning the restraint of a Common recovery which had béen so often debated and resolved should be once moved Vide supra 6. Co. l. 11. 87. a. 3. in the case of Monopolies 9 The Queen grants to one of the Privy Chamber the only making Monopolies and importation of Cards This was adjudged a Monopoly and therefore void and one of the reasons was because the grant was primae Impressionis for no such was ever seen to pass by Letters Patents under the Great seal to that very day And therefore because it was a dangerous Innovation without president or authority of Law or Reason and the Queen deceived in their grant it was adjudged void Dyer 135. 15. 3 4. P. M. 10 A Dedimus Potestatem was granted to Iustice Saunders to receive an Attorney for the defendant in a Quid juris clamat Quid juris clamat but because there could be found no former president for it it was with much difficulty and after long debate allowed by the Iudges and that upon great necessity and weakness of the party 205 Communis Error facit Jus. Co. Inst 1. 52. b. 2. 1 In a deed of feoffment beginning with Omnibus Christi fidelibus Livery by Attorney c. or Sciant omnes per praesentes c. or the like a Letter of Attorney may be contained for one continent may contain divers deeds to several persons But if it be by indenture between the feoffor on the one part and the feoffee on the other part there a Letter of Attorny in such a deed is not good unless the Attorney be made a party in the deed indented howbeit because it hath been commonly used to insert it in the Indenture without making the Attorny party thereunto it hath been permitted to pass but the other way is safest and more legal Communis Error facit Jus. Co. l. 6. 67. a. 4 in Sir Moâ—â—â—inches case 2 Where it is required by the Statute of 1 H. 5. 5. that in every writ original c. in which Exigent shall be awarded Additions Stat. 1 H. 5. Additions should be given to the defendants of their estate degree mystery c. It so fell out that one who was by birth but a Yeoman was commonly called Gentleman And in that case in such a writ brought against him he may have the Addition of Gentleman albeit in truth he is no Gentleman but only by vulgar reputation for in as much as the intention of the Act is that he should have such a name by which he may be known it is sufficient to satisfie the Act of Parliament for Communis error c. 206 So doth a Custom which is reasonable unreasonable contra Co. Inst â—pars 1. 59 b. 4 1 Of fines due to the Lord by the Copyholder Copyhold fines some be by the Change or alteration of the Lord and some by the Change or alteration of the tenant the change of the Lord ought to be by the act of God otherwise no fine can be due but by the change of the tenant either by the act of God or the act of the party a fine may be due for if the Lord do challenge a Custom within his Manor to have a fine of every of his Copyholders of the said Mannor at the alteration or change of the Lord of the Mannor be it by alienation demise death or otherwise This is a custom both against the Law and Reason as to the alteration or change of the Lord by the Act of the party for by that means the Copyholders may be oppressed by multitude of fines by the Act of the Lord But when the change groweth by the Act of God there the custom is good as by the death of the Lord And this was resolved upon a Case in Chancery by all the Iudges and Serjeants of Serjeants Inn in Fleetstreet Trin. 39 Eliz. and so certified into that Court But upon the change or alteration of the Tenant a fine is due unto the Lord because that custom is reasonable 2 Of fines taken of Copyholders some be certain by custom and some be uncertain The like but that fine although it be uncertain Co. ibid. yet ought it to be rationabilis and that reasonablenesse shall be discussed by the Iustices upon the true circumstances of the Case appearing unto them And if the Court where the cause dependeth adjudgeth the fine exacted unreasonable then is not the Copyholder compellable to pay it And so it was adjudged P. 1 Iac. C. B. rot 1845. for all excessiveness is abhorred in Law 3 In former times it hath been doubted whether or no if a Copyholder had béen ousted by his Lord Copyhold custom he might have any other remedy therein than only to sue to his Lord by petition for it seems Co. ibid. 60. b. 3. Littl. §. 77. that if the Copyholder might have any other remedy he could not be properly said to be Tenant at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the manor But Magistra rerum experientia hath made this cléer and without question that the Lord cannot at his pleasure put out the lawful Copyholder without some cause of forfeiture and if he do the Copyholder may have an Action of Trespasse against him For albeit he be tenens ad voluntatem Domini yet it is secundum consuetudinem manerii And Britton saith speaking of these kind of Tenants Et ascuns gents sont qui tout franks de sank et tenent terre de nous en villeynage et sont proprement nos sokemans Britton fo 163. Co. ibid. 140. a. 3. et ceux sout priviledges en ties manere que nul ne les doit ouster de tiels tene ments taut come ils font les services que a lour tenements appendant et nul ne poit lour services accressre ne changer a faire autres services ou plus autrement que ils ne solaient And herewith agreeth Sir Robert Danby Cl. Inst of the C. Pl. M. 7 E. 4. 19. and Sir Thomas Brian his Successor M. 21 E. 4. 80. That the Copyholder doing his customs and services if he be put out by his Lord shall have an Action of trespasse against him Consuetudo 4 Consuetudo contra rationem introducta potius usurpatio quam consuetudo appellari debet Again Co. ibid. 113. a 4. Consuetudo ex certa causa rationabili usitata privat communem Legem And Consuetudo praescripta et legitima vincit legem Villeinage fine to mary 5 All customs and prescriptions that are against reason are void Co. ibid. 139. b. 4. Littl.