pardon the punishment or remit the penalty which the Law imposeth upon Nonconformists and yet this is no countenancing of disobedience 5. It is further objected That if this right be allowed in the King Object it would be in his power by the exercise of it to repeal Statutes without the assent of his Parliament Several Acts of Parliament ordain conformity but if the King may indulge those who do not conform he doth in effect repeal those Acts of Parliament and make them to be of no force as to the Nonconformists To this somewhat mentioned in the last Section may in part be for an Answer Answ The Law enjoyns conformity or else a penalty he that submits to the penalty doth conform to the Law. And when the King indulgeth particular persons as to part of these Laws he doth not thereby repeal the Laws but remit some of the Penalties To repeal an Act of Parliament is wholly to take it away and to make it of no force which our Law saith must be done by the same power that made it the concurrent assent of the King Lords and Commons in Parliament But when the King grants Indulgence to some Nonconformists he doth not thereby repeal the Acts of Conformity which still continue but only to some particular persons he remits some of the penalty The Law is that a Traytor shall suffer death yet many have experience by his Majesties clemency that it is his right if he please to indulge and pardon the life of the Traytor Nevertheless none will say that hereby the King repeals the Law of Treason Upon a sentence of one to be an Heretick the Law heretofore was that a Writ de Haeretico comburendo be taken out and the Heretick to be burned Yet none of our Kings have been denied the Right and have frequently practised it to pardon the lives of such sentenced Hereticks as they thought fit to be indulged and yet thereby the Laws against Hereticks were not repealed By the same reason the King may pardon and indulge some Nonconformists and remit the Penalties which the Law imposeth on them and yet the Acts for Conformity are not thereby repealed 6. But to come nearer to the great point in question Object the main objection is That this Right of the King if it were before in him Stat. 14 Car. 2. cap. 14. yet now by his own consent it is barred and taken away by the late Act of this present Parliament for Uniformity If this be so our question is determined the wisdom and judgment of Parliament ought to bind and conclude all persons in the Kingdom who are parties and involved in their judgments and ought to acquiesce therein And with my particular due submission thereunto it seems to me that nothing in this Act doth take away or impeach but rather confirm this Right of Indulgence in the King. One Clause in this Act provides that the Penalties thereof shall not extend to the Foreigners or Aliens of the foreign Reformed Churches allowed or to be allowed by the King his Heirs or Successors in England By this Proviso the Parliament declares their judgment That this Right was and is fit to be in the King. And there occurs to me no reason but that the same Right is in the King to grant the like Indulgence to any other of his Subjects as by this Proviso is approved to these Foreigners whose posterity now become Natives do enjoy it This Right was in the King either before the Statute of Queen Elizabeth or annexed to the Crown by that Act. And either it was in him before the Statute of 25 H. 8. or is granted to him by that Act as hath been before shewed If any way this Right was once in the King as unquestionably it was then it cannot be barred nor taken away from him without express words in some subsequent Act of Parliament But there are no words in the late Act of Uniformity to bar or to take away this Right from the King therefore it remains in him as it was before and there is nothing in this Act to the contrary It is true that the King doth not dispence with a Law or any part of it whereby particular Interests are concerned as to those particular Interests Therefore that part of this Act which giveth a Right of Presentation to particular Patrons upon the Nonconformity is not to be dispensed with But as to the Penalties of this Act and of those other Acts to which it relates and which are reformation of manners and wherein no particular Interest is concerned the King may dispence with such Laws and Penalties as the resolution is in Halles Case Coke 5. Rep. Eccles Case f. 6.51 That the King may pardon Suites in the Ecclesiastical Courts because they are only to correct or punish the party for the offence or default which saith the Book the King may pardon and not for the particular interest of the party By the same reason the King hath a right to pardon or indulge the Penalties and execution of these Acts in which no particular Interest is touched and which are to correct and punish the party for his offence and default against these Laws especially when there are no words in the Act to impeach but rather to allow this right to be in the King and which clearly was in him before the making of this Statute CHAP. VIII Observations upon Examples of Persecution 1. PErsecution is a word taken from the Latin Persequor which signifies to follow to the extremity and denotes the execution of Revenge and slaughter That the good of Indulgence and the evil of Perfecution may the better appear some observations upon a few of very many Examples thereof in the Holy Story are here inserted and to begin with these of Persecution It is observed that for the most part ungodly men excited by pride and envy have persecuted the godly So it was in the first Persecution in the World when the elder Son of Adam persecuted his Brother Abel Cain was an ungodly man Gen. 4.5 for unto him and to his offering the Lord had not respect but Abel was a godly man for he brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof Gen. 4.4 and the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering because Abel and his offering had respect from God therefore was his Brother very wroth Bishop Halls Contemplatition upon Cain and Abel and persecuted Abel for his Religion such was the pride and envy of his heart upon which the Ingenious Bishop of Exon thus contemplates What then was the occasion of this capital malice Abel's Sacrifice is accepted what was this to Cain Cains is rejected What could Abel remedy this Oh envy the corrosive of all ill minds and the root of all desperate actions The same cause that moved Satan to tempt the first man to destroy himself and his posterity the same moved the second man to destroy the
Letters civilly and filially intreated the Pope and Cardinals 14 E. 2. lib. apud Turrim f. 85. not to hold plea at Rome of things done in England And though in his time the Spiritual Courts held plea Sr. John Davis Rep. f. 95. by the Statute of circumspectè agatis and by general allowance and usage yet they thought themselves not safe till the King had granted them Jurisdiction in these Cases Coke 5 Rep. Eccles Case f. 13. Stat. Articuli Cleri 9 E. 2. wherein the Parliament consented by their Act before mentioned And it was objected nevertheless against this King that he had given allowance to the Popes Bulls and Authority here 7. We meet with the same practice in the time of E. 3. and of his Grand-son R. 2. Edward the third was a wise and Powerful Prince and his time affords us a large view of this matter in the Records and Printed Statutes In his minority and in the heat of his wars in France the Pope sent many Briefs into England at which the King and his Subjects were much offended and did smartly oppose them By the Resolutions of the Judges Coke 5 Rep. Eccles Case f. 15.16 17. and of the Parliaments in his time they admitted no Jurisdiction of the Court of Rome here but punished those who did bring any Bulls from thence or obtained any Provisions of Benefices and the like He entirely resumed the right of his Crown in supream spiritual Jurisdiction The Statute of Provisors recites the Statute of Carlisle 25 E. 3. Stat. de provisor and Asserts That the Church of England was founded in the Estate of the Prelacy by the Kings and their Predecessors And this 27 E. 3. Stat. provis c. 1. and a subsequent Statute forbidding Provisions of Benefices by the Pope do testifie the authority of the King to be Supream in Spiritual matters So doth another Act forbidding those to be curst 32 E. 3. c. 1 2 3. who shall execute the former Laws In the Annals of our Law 17 E. 3.23 we also find Resolutions to the same effect for the Kings right of granting Exemptions from the Jurisdiction of the Ordinary which manifests his own Supream Spiritual Jurisdiction In his time it was resolved 28 Assis pl. 20. 38 E. 3. c. 7. Coke 5 Rep. Eccles Case f. 16. That a Priour being the Kings debtor might sue a Spiritual Person for Tithes in the Exchequer for until a Statute of this King the right of Tithes was determinable at the Kings Temporal Courts and in many Mannors of the King and of other Lords they had probate of Wills. This King translated Canons Secular into Regular and Religious 38 Assis pl. 22.49 E. 3. lib. Assis pl. 8. and made of the Priour and Covent of Westminster who were Regular Persons capable in Law to sue and to be sued All which and divers others omitted are proofs of this Jurisdiction in him In the Nonage of R. 2. the Power of Rome again budded and they attempted to incroach by sending hither Bulls Briefs and Legates Whereof the People were so impatient that they offered to live and dye with the King in withstanding this Usurpation In his time an Act makes it Death to bring any Summons 13 R. 2. c. 3. Excommunication c. against those who executed the Statute of Provisors Another Statute makes it a Praemunire to purchase or pursue in the Court of Rome or elsewhere any Translations Provisions 16 R. 2. c. 5. and Sentences of Excommunication Bulls Instruments or any other things which touched the King his Crown and Regality or his Realm And declares that the Crown of England hath been in no Earthly Subjection but free at all times and immediately Subject to God in all things which is full Supremacy and in all things includes Spirituals The King had also the ill fortune to have it objected against him in Parliament that he had allowed of some Bulls from Rome 8. We come now to the times of several Kings who found this point so well settled that there was not much need of their stirring in it yet the same Jurisdiction was exercised by them In H. 4. time were several Resolutions of the Judges Coke 5 Rep. Eccles Case f. 22 23 24. expresly disallowing the Supremacy of the Pope in this Realm and confirming the Kings A Statute makes it a Praemunire to purchase Bulls from Rome 2 H. 4. c. 3. 6 H. 4. c. 1. Another forbids the horrible Mischiefs and damnable Customes of the Court of Rome about compounding with the Popes Chamber for First-fruits Another makes it a Praemunire for any to put in execution here any Bulls for the discharge of Dismes 2 H. 4. c. 6. In his sons time an Act makes it a Praemunire for one by colour of Provisions from Rome and Licences thereupon 2 H. 5. c. 9. to molest any Incumbent In his time the Lands of Religious houses were in some danger to be taken away Martin Chron. p. 142. the King being Petitioned to suppress them as Nurseries of Idleness Gluttony Leachery and Pride and that their Revenues would bring yearly to the Kings Coffers 200000 l. and also maintain 15 Earls 1500 Knights and above 6000 men at Arms. But by the Policy and liberal offer of the Clergy to supply the Kings occasions in furtherance of his Title to France this business was diverted In the minority of H. 6. Sir Jo. Davis Rep. f. 96. when the Commons had deny'd the King a Subsidy the Prelates offered a large supply for his Warrs if the Act of Provision were repealed But Humphrey Duke of Gloucester who not long before had cast the Popes Bull into the fire caused this motion to be denyed as derogatory to the Kings Right and Supremacy In this Kings Reign it was adjudged 1 H. 6. f. 10. 8 H. 6. f. 1. that the Popes Excommunication is of no force in England by the Common Law. The succeeding Kings were not so active in these matters nor was there so much occasion for it in their time as in the Reigns of their Predecessors E. 1 H. 7.20 9 E. 4. f. 3. Fitz. N. B. f. 44. 12 E. 4.46 4. was full of trouble yet we find mention of a resolution in his time that the Pope could not grant any Sanctuary in England And that if one Spiritual Person did sue another at Rome where he might have Remedy here he should incurr a Praemunire Another Judgment was that the Popes Excommunication was of no force in England And when two Legates 1 H. 7. f. 10. one after another came into England they could not be admitted till they had taken an Oath to attempt nothing against the King and his Crown R. 2 R. 3. f. 22. 3. had a short and unhappy Reign after his wicked Usurpation and was careful to please the Clergy yet in his time it was resolved That a Judgment or Excommunication at Rome
fit as the Prince to give this Indulgence And it is not only lawfull to Tolerate disagreeing Perswasions but the Authority of God only is competent to take notice of it and infallible to determine it and fit to judge And therefore no humane Authority is sufficient to do all these things which can justifie the inflicting of temporal Punishments upon such as do not Conform in their Perswasions to a Rule or Authority which is not only fallible but supposed by the disagreeing Persons to be actually deceived But I consider saith the Bishop that in the Toleration of a different Opinion Religion is not properly and immediately concerned so as in any degree to be indangered It is also a part of Christian Religion Tertullian ad Scapul Humani juris naturalis potestatis unicuique quod putaverit colere sed nec Religionis est cogere religionem quae sucipi sponte debet non vi Heretici qui pace data scinduntur persecutione uniuntur Contra Remp. Dextra praecipue capit Indulgentia mentes Asperitas odium saevaque Bella parit that the Liberty of mens Consciences should be preserved in all things where God hath not set a limit and made a restraint that the Soul of man should be free and acknowledge no Master but Christ Jesus that matters Spiritual should not be restrained by Punishments Corporal Thuanus wisely observes That if you Persecute Hereticks or Discrepants they Vnite themselves as to a common defence if you Permit and Indulge them they divide themselves upon private Interest and the rather if this Interest was an ingredient of the Opinion the reason therefore is much the stronger for this Indulgence In Cases where there is no sin nor disturbance of the publique Peace it is not only lawful to permit but necessary that Princes and all in Authority should not Persecute discrepant Opinions 5. That this right of granting Indulgence is in the King seems also to be warranted from the Common Law of England The Statute before cited recites that by authentique Histories and Chronicles it appears that this Realm is an Empire and both Spiritualty and Temporalty subject to it and that the King is Supream Head thereof 24 H. 8. This being so by the Common Law He as supream Head may grant any Indulgence or Dispensation where the Law doth not forbid the same And I know no Law which forbids the Kings granting of Indulgence in this Case In the time of K. 4 H. 3. 7 H. 3. prohibit 13 15 H. 3. prohibit 15.22 Cokâ— 5. Rep. Eccles Case fol. 1. Hen. 3. and since Prohibitions were frequent and granted as the Kings right by the Common Law. So was the Writing in the Kings Name to the Bishop to absolve a person Excommunicate and to certifie Loyalty of Marriage Bastardy and the like If in these Spiritual matters the King by the Common Law might indulge as to absolve a person Excommunicate and the like he may upon as strong Reason of the Law give Indulgence in the matters now desired We find also in the Annals of our Law Resolutions that the King may exempt any Ecclesiastical person from the Jurisdiction of the Ordinary 17 E. 3.24 and may grant to him Episcopal Jurisdiction and Exemption this was nothing else but an Indulgence granted by the King and that from the grounds of the Common Law. By the Common Law the King may dispense with Ecclesiastical Law 11 H. 7. f. 12. for Pluralities and for a Bastard to be made a Priest by the same ground of Law he may grant the Dispensation and Indulgence which is now desired A Dispensation or a Non Obstante is nothing else but an Indulgence in that particular case according to the Canon Law. And it was the Resolution of all the Judges of England Coke 7 Rep. Case de penal Laws f. 16.37 in the 2d year of King James That the King upon any Cause moving him in respect of time place person c. may grant a Non Obstante to dispense with any particular person that he shall not incurre the penalty of a Statute and this agreeth with Books of Law. Another Resolution was by divers of the Judges 10 Apr. 9 Car. 1. at the Sessions at Newgate That the King may pardon an Indictment upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. and that he may by the Common Law give a License to one to exercise a Trade for all his Life-time although he had not been an Apprentice to it because it is not malum in se but malum prohibitum Upon the same Reason and ground of Law Coke 11 Rep. f. 88. Dispensatio mali prohibiti st de jure domino Regi concessa propter impossibilitatem praevidendi de omâ—i us particularibus Dispensatio est provida relaxatio mali prohibiti utilitate seu necessitate pensata Brittan f. 280. 282 283. Fleta l. 6. c. 8. Coke Comment on Littleton f. 131. the King may grant a License of Indulgence in spiritual matters as well as in those Cases of temporal matters especially when the Indulgence is not desired for any thing that is malum in se but only perhaps Bonum prohibitum It is agreed for Law in another Case in our Books That the Law hath given power to the King that of right he may dispense with a prohibited evil because of the impossibility of foreseeing all particulars which may fall out And that a Dispensation is a provident relaxation or Indulgence of a prohibited evil upon consideration of profit or necessity The right to do this being by our Law in the King comprehends within the same right of the King his granting of Indulgence in matters spiritual By the old Law no Lord or Knight could go beyond Sea because thereby the Realm might be disfurnished of valiant men Yet in that Case the King might by the Common Law grant Licence or Indulgence to any Lord or Knight or other to go beyond Sea and dispense with that Law. But I am not arguing at the Bar a point of Law to cite all Authorities I can meet with for it I only mention a few to the end that by them the reason of the Law and the Application to our present purpose may be the better apprehended I shall therefore forbear to cite more and conclude with this one general ground of our Common Law the wisdom whereof hath thought fit that Acts of Grace and Favour should be in the Right of the King to be dispensed by him for the more obliging of his Subjects and the gaining their affections to him Hence it is that the granting of Exemptions Licences Faculties Dispensations Non-obstante's and the like Acts of Grace are left unto the King and are in his right to grant or deny them as he shall judge fit So it is if a man be convicted of Felony or Treason and hath judgment of Death past upon him by the Law he is to suffer Death yet the Law gives the Power and
did not prejudice any man here H. 7. was a prudent and wary man not forward to disoblige any party 1 H. 7. f. 10. especially so great a one as the Clergy yet in his time divers Resolutions passed to the same effect as before for the vindication of the Kings Supremacy The Judges affirmed 10 H. 7. f. 18. Persona mixta that the King is a mixt person having both spiritual and temporal jurisdiction in him And that the King may dispense with the Ecclesiastical Law for Pluralities 11 H. 7. f. 12. and for a Bastard to be made Priest 9. We are now come to the great Wheel which turned upside down the whole course of Ecclesiastical Affairs King H. 8. who not only resumed absolutely the whole spiritual Jurisdiction into his own hands but totally abolished the Supremacy of the Pope in England The cause hereof some would attribute to his Covetousness but he was rather prodigal and though none are more covetous than some prodigal men to get fuel for their flames yet the humour of covetousness was spent in his Father and his own Education and Practice was otherwise His displeasure against the Pope about the business of Queen Katherine and the precedent of Woolsey added to his private grudge and Haughtiness might put him upon this work which he went through with and that by Parliament which he sufficiently commanded It chiefly began in the 24 year of his Reign 24 H. 8. c. 2. when an Act was made which fully recites the Kings supreme Jurisdiction both in Spiritual and Temporal matters without Appeal to any foreign Princes or Potentates It enacts that all Causes determinable by any spiritual Jurisdiction shall be adjudged within the Kings Authority and if any procure Appeals Process c. from Rome he shall iucurre a Praemunire The next year an Act was made 25 H. 8. c. 19. wherein the Clergy acknowledged the Kings Supremacy and that they are convened by his Writ And no Canons to be of force without his assent which is enacted accordingly And that the King may assign 32 persons to examine the Canons and to continue such of them as they think fit and to restrain the rest Appeals to Rome are forbid and that Appeals from places exempt and which were formerly to the Sea of Rome shall for the future be to the King in Chancery which is a great asserting of the Kings Supremacy Another Act the same year declares 25 H. 8. c. 20. that the King may grant his Conge deslier for Bishops and in default of Election of them the King may nominate the Bishop by his Letters Patents and they to be consecrated here Another Act reciting the Popes Exactions for Dispensations 25 H. 8. c. 21. Licences c. in derogation of the Imperial Crown and Authority Royal enacts that none be had from Rome and gives power to the King therein which will be mentioned in another place The next Parliament unites to the Crown the title of Supreme Head of the Church 28 H. 8. c. 1. and all Jurisdictions and Authorities thereto belonging Another Act gives to the King First-fruits as the Pope had them 26 H. 8. c. 3. Another Act forbids Appeals to Rome 28 H. 8. c. 7. Another since repeal'd makes it a Praemunire to extoll or defend the Authority of the See of Rome 28 H. 8. c. 10. And Officers to be sworn to renounce and resist it Another Act makes void Licenses and Indulgences from Rome 28 H. 8. c. 16. and those allowable to be confirmed under the Great Seal In the 31 year of his Reign 31 H. 8. c. 9. an Act gives him power to nominate such number of Bishops Bishops Seas and Churches and to endow them with such Possessions as he will. Another Act gives to the King all the rest of the Monasteries not dissolved and their Possessions An Act of as much neglect of the Romish Power and of as much Supremacy in the King in matters spiritual as may be imagined Which Supremacy was further exercised by this King in the Laws made for confirmation of the Romish Doctrine and the Six Articles upon which was great severity some being put to death for affirming the Popes Supremacy others for denying his Doctrine all at the same time 10. We come now to the succeeding Princes Edw. 6. proceeded in spiritual matters as to the Doctrinal part concerning which sundry Acts of Parliament were made 1 E. 6. c. 12. One makes it Treason to affirm that the King is not or that the Pope is supream Head of the Church in England An Act ordains the Book of Common Prayer 2 3 E. 6. c. 1 12.19 2 3 E. 6. c. 20 21. 3 4 E. 6. c. 10. 3 4 E. 6. c. 10. Another is about payment of Tythes prohibiting flesh on Fasting dayes For payment of Tenths to the King and Repeal of Laws against Marriage of Priests Another takes away Popish Books and Images repealed by Queen Mary Another gives Power to the King to name 32 persons to examine the Ecclesiastical Laws and to set forth such as they think fit People are required to come to Church 5 6 E. 6. c. 1.3 5 6 E. 6. c. 12. 1 M. c. 2.9 the Common Prayer with some Alterations enacted Fasting dayes to be observed Priests Marriages lawfull But all the good Laws made by this King were repealed by his Sister Queen Mary and such Service as was in the last year of Hen. 8. to be used That she may make Orders for governance of Cathedral and Collegiate Churches Acts against Heresie are revived 1 M. c. 6. but this was repealed 1 El. c. 1. Cardinal Pool dispensed with the Lay-mens possession to retain Abbey-Lands 2 3 P. M. c. 4. And the Queen remitted First-fruits and renounced Ecclesiastical Livings Queen Elizabeth turned all about again 1 El. c. 1. and by Act of Parliament all foreign Jurisdictions spiritual are abolished the Statutes of H. 8. her Father for this purpose are revived So are the Statutes of her Brother 1 E. 6. c. 1. and she repeals the Statute 1 2 P. M. c. 6. And it is enacted that such Jurisdictions spiritual as lawfully were exercised before shall be united to the Imperial Crown of this Realm And the Queen hath power to assign Commissioners in matters Ecclesiastical and enacts the Oath of Supremacy The Act of 1 M. is repealed and the Book of Common Prayer of 5 6 E. 6. C. 1. is established 'T is made Penal to maintain the Authority of the Sea of Rome 1 El. c. 4. the Oath of Supremacy to be taken 5 El. c. 1. Fasting dayes to be observed The Bible and Common Prayer to be translated and confirmed Bulls from Rome are prohibited 5 El. c. 5.5 13 El. c. 1. and reconciling to that Church and bringing in of Agnus Dei Pictures Crosses c. Made
punishment in the life to come For the People of the Jews our persecuted Prince foretold what should become of them for their persecutions I send unto you Prophets and Wisemen and Scribes Matt. 23.34 35 38. and some of them ye shall kill and crucifie and some of them ye shall scourge in your Synagogues and persecute them from City to City Then follows the most fearful of all Judgments That upon you may come all the Righteous blood shed upon the Earth from the blood of Righteous Able to the blood of Zacharias Behold your House is left unto you desolate Josephus Eusebius Socrates Scholast c. The Ecclesiastical story sets forth the full accomplishment of this Prophecy the sad calamities which befel the Jews in the Siege of Jerusalem and the taking and demolishing of it and of the stately Temple whereof nothing was left but heaps upon heaps and all buried in Ruine The People carried away Captives lost their Native Country dispersed over the face of the Earth and besides the unexpressible miseries inflicted by Divine Justice on that Generation it reacheth also to all their Posterity who ever since have been wanderers up and down the Earth and sojourners in strange Lands and have had no City or fixed Habitation to dwell in 7. The example and course of the Master was followed by his Disciples that knew him in those times and will be chearfully submitted unto if God shall require it by all such who in our time shall be acquainted with the Lord Jesus to suffer with patience and joy the Persecutions which the Enemies of Christ shall inflict upon them whereof our Saviours predictions was They shall deliver you up to be afflicted and shall kill you Matt. 24.9 10 13. and ye shall be hated of all Nations for my names sake and then shall many be offended and shall betray one another and shall hate one another But he that shall endure to the end shall be saved That this was fulfilled in the Persecution of the Disciples of Christ appears too evidently in the Ecclesiastical story and the particulars thereof are too many to be inserted in this short Treatise they may at large and with sorrow be perused in their Authors John the Baptist for displeasing Herodes Antipas in his Doctrine and Opinion about his Brother Philips Wife was imprisoned and afterwards in a kind of frolick beheaded by him Euseb l. 2. c. 4. Jos Antiq. l. 8. c. 9. Acts 8.1.3 This Herod as Eusebius and others testifie was afterwards condemned to perpetual banishment Saul was himself a great persecutor of the People of God he was consenting to the death of Stephen and there was a great persecution against the Church As for Saul he made havock of the Church entring into every House and haling men and Women committed them to Prison And breathing out threatnings and slaughter against the Disciples of the Lord Acts 9.1 2. went unto high Priest and desired of him Letters to Damascus to the Synagogues that if he found any of this way Nonconformist whether they were men or women he might bring them bound to Jerusalem This fierce persecutor was miraculously convinced of his sin as all persecutors one day will be and he became himself a persecuted Disciple of Christ Jesus Nero 2 Tim. 4.17 Eutrop. l. 8. whom he calls the Lyon and who was a fierce persecutor of him as Eutropius relates was sentenced by the Senate to whipped to death which although he escaped yet afterwards he slew himself Herodes Agrippa stretched for his hands to vex certain of the Church Acts. 12.1 2. and he killed James the Brother of John with the Sword this persecutor also perished by an horrible death Domitian the presecutor of John the Evangelist Jos Antiq. l. 10. c. 7. Suetonius Eutropius was slain in his Bed by his own servants his Wife consenting to it and his Carkass thrown into the Street by order of the Senate Throughout almost the whole Book of the Acts of the Apostles are stories of the persecution of Christs Disciples I confine my self to those Examples which occur in the Holy story nor can I mention but some of them and must refer those who desire to look more particularly into this matter to the Ecclesiastical story where they will find stories of that horror and bitterness of persecution against the People of God and those who professed the Name of Christ Jesus that would melt a Pious heart and those horrible judgments of God against the persecutors of his Servants that may forewarn all persecutors whatsoever from the wicked ways of persecution and deter them from imposing upon men any thing contrary to that freedom of Conscience which is due to all that profess the Faith of Christ and whosoever by persecution shall seek to take it from them will ensnare themselves in misery probably here certainly hereafter 8. This Chapter may be concluded with some few further Observations upon the Examples before remembred from the holy Scripture By all which it appears evidently that in all times and in all places the People and Servants of God have been under severe persecutions but what hath been the end and issue thereof Eternal joy and comfort I know the Objection is obvious that the Examples before remembred and divers others which may occur are not applicable to the subject matter of our present Discourse they are of persecutions of the People of God and of Christians by Heathens and by the Jews who believed not that the Messias was come but the matter now in Discourse is of injoyning conformity in Sectaries and Schismaticks by the lawful Power and Authority of the Rulers of the Church of Christ and therefore these Examples come not to this matter But if a dissenting Brother do judg or doubt that what is imposed on his Conscience is contrary to the will of God He holds himself equally obliged not to conform thereunto as the Ancient Primitive Christians or the Jews held themselves bound not to conform to the Impositions of Heathen Emperors Governours in matters Spiritual And they do observe that if God shewed so great displeasure for those Impositions of the Heathen upon his People That surely he will be as much displeased at the Impositions of Christians upon Christians and of Protestants upon Protestants in Spiritual Matters and which are not Fundamental and where the publick Peace is not disturbed It may be further observed that in all Examples of Persecution the Power and Authority of the King or Monarch was made use of and by the same Reason and Authority his Power and Right of Indulgence may be exercised The Observation of powring out of the Wrath and Vengeance of God upon the Persecutors of his People hath been before in part noted and may be found throughout the Stories of those Passages And it is a greater breach of Charity and Christian Duty for a Professor of Christ than for an Unbeliever to persecute a
Right to the King that he may indulge this condemned person and give him a pardon for his life which is every dayes experience And many in our time have tasted the fruits of his Majesties Grace and Clemency herein And if the Common Law gives this Right of Indulgence for Life to the King it were hard to deny it him in Spiritual matters for not coming to Church or the like 6. That this right was in the King by the Common Law and practice of it may appear from many both ancient and later Precedents some whereof and first before the time of W. 1. will be remembred in their order It is observed â—â—n â—Rep â—praeâ— f. that as under the Temoral Monarchy of Rome Britain was one of the last Provinces that was won and one of the first that was lost again so under the spiritual Monarchy of the Pope England was one of the last Countreys of Christendom that received this Yoak and one of the first that did reject and cast it off again That the Sea of Rome before W. 1. s time had no Jurisdiction in England neither in the time of the Brittans nor of the Saxons as appears by the passages of Pelagins and Colman an Irish Saint and divers others in our story but that the Kings then exercised Supream Spiritual Jurisdiction appears in part by what hath been before noted out of our stories It will not be supposed an easie thing â—ev â—esbur â—de â—ccles at so great a distance of time and after so many Revolutions and injuries of accidents to find particular apt precedents for that which is our present argument yet there seemeth to have been some even in those times not impertinent to our purpose In the Reign of the British King Arviragus â—Parkâ— â—34 in the 63 year after the birth of our Saviour it is related that Joseph of Arimathea and eleven more of Philips Disciples arrived in Brittan and preached the name of Christ unto the Brittans who were then Pagans This new Doctrine and Religion wholly contrary to Paganisme and tending to the subversion of that whereof the Brittans were so blindly zealous yet tho they could hardly be perswaded to change the Traditions of their Fathers nevertheless they were so far from persecuting of these Non-conformists to the old Religion that they freely permitted them to preach and to instruct the people in this new Doctrine and Worship though wholly different from their own Profession And the King did so far grant Indulgence to them and to all that would hear them that every one had the liberty of his own Conscience indulged to them And because these Preachers came from far and that their lives were full of Modesty and Meekness and that they instructed the people in pious things the King for their maintinance granted to them the Isle of Glassenbury each one of these Non-conformists having an hide of Land given to him and they twelve in number they are called the twelve Hides of Glassenbury to this day You see the Pagans were so far from persecuting them or taking any thing from them as they gave them a livelyhood This Indulgence and grant was confirmed by many of the Saxon Kings their Successors When Paganus and Damianus preached the Gospel of Christ to the Brittans King Lucius not only gave them Indulgence though their Doctrine and Religion was so contrary to Heathenisme then professed here but both the King and his People became Non-conformists to their old Pagan Worship and embraced the true Faith of Christ How much longer might that blessed Truth have been hid from our eyes and that glorious Light of the Sun of Righteousness have been obscured from our eyes had it not been for granting Indulgence to the preaching of it sure we ought to have the better opinion of Indulgence since Christianity was introduced by it So it was when Augustin the Monk preached to the Saxons had he not been indulged to preach and the people to hear our Saxon Ancestors had not been converted to the knowledge of Christ Jesus The Christian Saxon King Kenulphe Stamford 3. c. 38. f. 111. 1 H. 7. fâ— 23. tit 2 Coke 5 Rep. Ecclâ— Case f. 9. Ab omni Episcopali juâ— re in sempeternum esse quietus nuâ— lius Episcoâ— aut suorum officialium jugo inde depremantur Leg. Alureâ— Reg. c. 2. Bilson differ p. 40 Bede l. 1. c. 25. by the Counfel of his Bishops and Senators did grant to the Abbey of Abingdon certain Lands with an express clause of Indulgence contained in the grant That the Abbot and his Successors should be free for ever from all Episcopal Jurisdiction and that the Tenants and Inhabitants should not be depressed by the yoak of any Bishop or his Officials but in all things should submit to the Decrees of the Abbot And although this were done by the Councel of his Bishops and Senators that doth not impeach but rather fortifie the Kings Right to do it by their Judgments that it should be done by him In the Laws of King Alured he grants Indulgences and Immunities for the Clergy themselves And when Gregory sent Augustin the Monk and his Companions to convert the Saxons they stayed in the Isle of Thanet till the Kings pleasure were known and whether he would grant them Indulgence to exercise their Religion here and instruct others therein which the King although it were sufficiently different from the Religion then professed by the Heathen Saxons did grant unto these Dissenters and encouraged them so far that at length they became of their perswasion The Application may be thus far proper That if Pagans gave so much Indulgence to Christians it would ill beseem Christians not to give the like to one another 7. Some Precedents in the time of W. 1. and after Eadmerus f. 165. 167 7 E 3. Quare Impâ— 19. 5 Rep. f. 10â— Mat. Paris Anno 1119 Coke 5 Rep. Eccleâ— Case f. 106â— Roger Hovenden f. 496. down unto our own memories may be next in order remembred W. 1. granted a full Indulgence by his Charter of Exemption unto Battel-Abbey that they should be under no Jurisdiction of the Bishop And it was an Indulgence to the Free-holders when he divided the Bishops Court from the Hundred Court which before that sate both together So was his appropriating of Churches without Cure to Ecclesiastical Persons The like exemption and Indulgence is granted by his Charter to the Abbey of Reading H. 1. granted an Indulgence by his Charter to the Abbey of Reading and saith he doth it as well in regard of Ecclesiastical as Regal Power H. 2. granted an Indulgence to his people That none of the Popes Decrees should be executed here nor any of his Bulls of Excommunication Not. in Eadâ— mer p. 14â— He did the like to his Clergy of Normandy in the Exemptions he granted to them 45 H. 3. Rot. Stanâ— in 14. dorsoâ— 1 E. 1. Rot. Stans in 5. dorsoâ— H. 11.