of Believers Heb. 10. 2. 3. The actual Intercession of Christ in Heaven as the second Act of his sacerdotal Office is a fundamental Article of our Faith and a principal Foundation of the Churches consolation So is it asserted to be 1 John 2. 1 2. And it is expressed by our Apostle as that whereby the Death of Christ is made effectual unto us Rom. 8. 3 4. For it comprizeth the whole care and all the Actings of Christ as our High Priest with God in the behalf of the Church This therefore is the immediate spring of all Gracious communications unto us For hereby doth he act his own Care Love and Compassion and from thence do we receive all Mercy all Supplies of Grace and Consolation needful unto our Duties Temptations and Trials Hereon depends all our encouragement to make our Application unto God to come with boldness of Faith unto the Throne of Grace Chap. 4. 15 16. Chap. 10. 21 22. Wherefore whatever Apprehensions we may attain of the manner of it the thing it self is the center of our Faith Hope and Consolation 4. It is no way unworthy or unbecoming the humane nature of Christ in its glorious Exaltation to pray unto God It was in and by the humane Nature that the Lord Christ exercised and executed all the Duties of his Offices whilst he was on Earth And he continueth to discharge what remains of them in the same Nature still And however that Nature be glorified it is the same essentially that it was when he was in this world To ascribe another kind of Nature unto him under pretence of a more divine Glory is to deny his Being and to substitute a fancy of our own in his Room So then the Humane Nature of Christ however exalted and glorifyed is humane Nature still subsisting in dependance on God and subjection unto him Hence God gives him new Revelations now in his glorified condition Revel 1. 1. With respect hereunto he acted of old as the Angel of the Covenant with expresse Prayers for the Church Zech. 1. 12 13. So the Command given him to intercede by the way of Petition Request or Prayer Psal. 2. 8. Ask of me respects his state of Exaltation at the Right hand of God when he was declared to be the Son of God with Power by the Resurrection from the dead v. 7 8. And the Incense which he offereth with the Prayers of the Saints Rev. 8. 3 4. is no other but his own Intercession whereby their Prayers are made acceptable unto God 5. This Praying of Christ at present is no other but such as may become him who sits down at the Right hand of the Majesty on High There must therefore needs be a great difference as to the outward manner between his present Intercession in Heaven and his Praying whilst he was on the Earth especially at some seasons For being encompassed here with Temptations and Difficulties he cast himself at the foot of God with strong cryes tears and supplications Chap. 5. 7. This would not become his present glorious state nor is he liable or exposed unto any of the causes or occasions of that kind of treating with God And yet at an another time whilst he was in this world he gave us the best estimate and Representation of his present Intercession that we are able to comprehend And this was in his Prayer recorded John 17th For therein his confidence in God his Union in and with him the Declaration of his Will and Desires are all expressed in such a manner as to give us the best understanding of his present Intercession For a created nature can rise no higher to expresse an Interest in God with an Oneness of mind and Will than is therein declared And as the Prayers with cryes and tears when he offered himself unto God were peculiarly Typed by the Fire on the Altar so was this solemn Prayer represented by that cloud of Incense wherewith the High Priest covered the Ark and the Mercy-seat at his entrance into the most holy place In the vertue of this holy cloud of incense did he enter the Holy places not made with hands Or we may apprehend its Relation unto the Types in this Order His Prayer John 17th was the preparation of the sweet Spices whereof the Incense was made and compounded Exod. 30. 34. His Sufferings that ensued thereon were as the breaking and bruising of those Spices wherein all his Graces had their most fervent exercise as Spices yield their strongest savour under their bruising At his entrance into the Holy place this Incense was fired with Coals from the Altar that is the efficacy of his Oblation wherein he had offered himself unto God through the Eternal Spirit rendred his Prayer as Incense covering the Ark and Mercy-seat that is procuring the fruits of the Attonment made before God 6. It must be granted that there is no need of the use of Words in the immediate Presence of God God needs not our words whilst we are here on Earth as it were absent from him For he is present with us and all things are open and naked before him But we need the use of them for many reasons which I have elsewhere declared But in the glorious presence of God when we shall behold him as the Lord Christ doth in the most eminent manner Face to Face it cannot be understood what need or use we can have of words to express our selves unto God in Prayers or Praises And the souls of men in their separate state and condition can have no use of Voice or VVords yet are they said to cry and pray with a loud voice because they do so virtually and effectually Rev. 6. 9 10. However I will not determine what outward Transactions are necessary unto the glory of God in this matter before the Angels and Saints that are about his Throne For there is yet a Church state in Heaven wherein we have Communion Chap. 12. 22 23 24. What solemn outward and as it were visible Transactions of worship are required thereunto we know not And it may be the Representation of Gods Throne and his worship Revel 4 5. wherein the Lamb in the midst of the Throne hath the principal part may not belong only unto what is done in the Church here below And somewhat yet there is which shall cease and not be any more after the Day of Judgment 1 Cor. 15. 26 28. 7. It must be granted that the vertue efficacy and Prevalency of the Intercession of the Lord Christ depends upon and flows from his Oblation and Sacrifice This we are plainly taught from the Types of it of Old For the Incense and carrying of Blood into the Holy place after the Expiatory Sacrifice the great Type of his Oblation of himself did both of them receive their efficacy and had respect unto the Sacrifice offered without Besides it is expresly said that the Lord Christ by the one Offering of himself obtained for us eternal
cause God saw it necessary and it pleased him to put a grievous and heavy yoke upon them to subdue the pride of their spirits and to cause them to breathe after deliverance This the Apostle Peter calls a yoke that neither they nor their Fathers were able to bear Acts 15. 20. that is with peace ease and rest which therefore the Lord Christ invited them to seek for in himself alone Matth. 11. 29 30. And this yoke that God put on them consisted in these three things 1. In a multitude of Precepts hard to be understood and difficult to be observed The present Jews reckon up 613 of them about the sense of most of which they dispute endlesly among themselves But the truth is since the days of the Pharisees they have increased their own yoke and made obedience unto their Law in any tolerable manner altogether unpracticable It were easie to manifest for instance that no man under Heaven ever did or ever can keep the Sabbath according to the Rules they give about it in their Talmuds And they generally scarce observe one of them themselves But in the Law as given by God himself it is certain that there were a multitude of arbitrary Precepts and those in themselves not accompanied with any spiritual Advantages as our Apostle shews Chap. 9. 5. only they were obliged to perform them by a meer soveraign Act of Power and Authority 2. In the severity wherewith the observance of all those Precepts were enjoined them And this was the threatning of death For he that despised Moses 's Law died without mercy and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward Hence was their complaint of old Behold we die we perish we all perish whosoever cometh near unto the Tabernacle of the Lord shall dye shall we be consumed with dying Numb 17. 12 13. And the Curse solemnly denounced against every one that confirmed not all things written in the Law was continually before them 3. In a Spirit of Bondage unto Fear This was administred in the giving and dispensation of the Law even as a Spirit of Liberty and Power is administred in and by the Gospel And as this respected their present Obedience and manner of its performance so in particular it regarded Death not yet conquered by Christ. Hence our Apostle affirms that through fear of Death they were all their life-time subject unto Bondage This state God brought them into partly to subdue the pride of their hearts trusting in their own righteousness and partly to cause them to look out earnestly after the promised Deliverer 4. Into this estate and condition God brought them by a Solemn Covenant confirmed by mutual consent between him and them The Tenure Force and Solemn Ratification of this Covenant is expressed Exod. 24. 3 4 5 6 7 8. Unto the terms and conditions of this Covenant was the whole Church obliged indispensibly on pain of Extermination until all was accomplished Mal. 4. 4 5 6. Unto this Covenant belonged the Decalogue with all Precepts of Moral Obedience thence educed So also did the Laws of Political Rule established among them and the whole Systeme of Religious Worship given unto them All these Laws were brought within the verge of this Covenant and were the matter of it And it had especial Promises and Threatnings annexed unto it as such whereof none did exceed the Bounds of the Land of Canaan For even many of the Laws of it were such as obliged no where else Such was the Law of the Sabbatical year and all their Sacrifices There was Sin and Obedience in them or about them in the Land of Canaan none elsewhere Hence 5. This Covenant thus made with these Ends and Promises did never save nor condemn any man eternally All that lived under the Administration of it did attain eternal life or perished for ever but not by vertue of this Covenant as formally such It did indeed revive the commanding Power and Sanction of the first Covenant of Works and therein as the Apostle speaks was the Ministry of condemnation 2 Cor. 3. 9. For by the deeds of the Law can no flesh be justified And on the other hand it directed also unto the Promise which was the instrument of life and salvation unto all that did believe But as unto what it had of its own it was confined unto things temporal Believers were saved under it but not by vertue of it Sinners perished eternally under it but by the Curse of the original Law of Works And 6. Hereon occasionally fell out the ruine of that People their Table became a snare unto them and that which should have been for their welfare became a trap according to the Prediction of our Saviour Psal. 69. 22. It was this Covenant that raised and ruined them it raised them to Glory and Honour when given of God it ruined them when abused by themselves contrary to express declarations of his mind and will For although the generality of them were wicked and rebellious always breaking the Terms of the Covenant which God made with them so far as it was possible they should whil'st God determined to reign over them unto the appointed season and repined under the burden of it yet they would have this Covenant to be the only Rule and Means of righteousness life and salvation as the Apostle declares Rom. 9. 31 32 33. Chap. 10. 3. For as we have often said there were two things in it both which they abused unto other ends than what God designed them 1 There was the Renovation of the Rule of the Covenant of Works for righteousness and life And this they would have to be given unto them for those ends and so sought for righteousness by the works of the Law 2 There was ordained in it a Typical Representation of the way and means whereby the Promise was to be made effectual namely in the Mediation and Sacrifice of Jesus Christ which was the end of all their Ordinances of Worship And the outward Law thereof with the observance of its Institution they looked on as their only relief when they came short of exact and perfect righteousness Against both these pernicious Errors the Apostle disputes expresly in his Epistle unto the Romans and the Galatians to save them if it were possible from that ruine they were casting themselves into Hereon the Elect obtained but the rest were hard ned For hereby they made an absolute renunciation of the Promise wherein alone God had enwrapped the way of life and salvation This is the nature and substance of that Covenant which God made with that People a particular temporary Covenant it was and not a meer dispensation of the Covenant of Grace That which remains for the declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost in this whole matter is to declare the differences that are between those two Covenants whence the one is said to be better than the other and to be built upon better Promises Those of
yet what use and advantage was it of with respect unto them that he should dye an accursed death under the Curse of the Law and a sense of God's displeasure Hereof the Socinians and those that follow them can yield no reason at all It would become these men so highly pretending unto reason to give an account upon their own Principles of the death of the onely begotten Son of God in the highest course and most intense Acts of Obedience that may be compliant with the wisdom holiness and goodness of God considering the kind of death that he dyed But what they cannot do the Apostle doth in the next words Eighthly The death of the Mediator of the New Testament was for the Redemption of Transgressions and for this End it was necessary Sin lay in the way of the enjoyment of the Inheritance which Grace had prepared It did so in the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God Unless it were removed the Inheritance could not be received The way whereby this was to be done was by Redemption The Redemption of Transgressions is the deliverance of the Transgressors from all the Evils they were subject unto on their account by the payment of a satisfactory price The words used to express it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will admit of no other signification Here it must answer the purging of Conscience by the blood of Christ. And he calls his life a Ransom or Price of Redemption And this utterly destroys the foundation of the Socinian Redemption and Expiation for Sin For they make it only a freedom from Punishment by an Act of Power Take off the covering of the words which they use in a sense foreign to the Scripture and their proper signification and their sense is expresly contradictory unto the sense and words of the Apostle He declares Christ to have been the High-Priest and Mediator of the New Testament in the same Acts and Duties They teach that he ceased to be a Mediator when he began to be a Priest He affirms that the Blood of Christ doth expiate Sins They that he doth it by an Act of Power in Heaven where there is no use of his Blood He says that his death was necessary unto and was the means or cause of the Redemption of Transgressions that is to be a price of Redemption or just Compensation for them They contend that no such thing is required thereunto And whereas the Scriptures do plainly assign the Expiation of Sin Redemption Reconciliation and Peace with God Sanctification and Salvation unto the Death and Blood-shedding of Christ They deny them all and every one to be in any sense Effects of it only they say it was an antecedent sign of the Truth of his Doctrine in his Resurrection and an antecedent condition of his Exaltation and Power which is to reject the whole Mystery of the Gospel Besides the particular Observations which we have made on the several passages of this Verse something may yet in general be observed from it As 1. A New Testament providing an Eternal Inheritance in Sovereign Grace the Constitution of a Mediator such a Mediator for that Testament in infinite Wisdom and Love the Death of that Testator for the Redemption of Transgressions to fulfil the Law and satisfie the Iustice of God with the communication of that Inheritance by Promise to be received by Faith in all them that are called are the substance of the Mystery of the Gospel And all these are with wonderful wisdom comprised by the Apostle in these words 2. That the Efficacy of the Mediation and Death of Christ extended it self unto all the called under the Old Testament is an evident Demonstration of his Divine Nature his Pre-existence unto all these things and the Eternal Covenant between the Father and him about them 3. The first Covenant did only forbid and Condemn Transgressions Redemption from them is by the New Testament alone 4. The Glory and Efficacy of the New Covenant and the Assurance of the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance by vertue of it depend hereon that it was made a Testament by the death of the Mediator which is farther proved in the following Verses VER XVI XVII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the death of him is declared shewed argued or proved Mors intercedat necesse est Necesse est mortem intercedere Ar. Necesse est mortem ferri which is not proper in the Latine Tongue however there is an emphasis in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more than is expressed by intercedo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him that made it of the Testator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in him that is dead in mortuis among them that are dead 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vulg confirmatum est and so the Syriac ratum est more proper 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no use profit or benefit in it Ar. nunquam valet quandoquidem nunquam valet nondum valet it is not yet of force For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be brought in the death of the Testator For a Testament is firm or ratified after men are dead otherwise it is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth There is not much more to be considered in these verses but only how the Observation contained in them doth promote and confirm the Argument which the Apostle insists upon Now this is to prove the necessity and use of the death of Christ from the Nature Ends and Use of the Covenant whereof he was the Mediator For it being a Testament it was to be confirmed with the death of the Testator This is proved in these Verses from the Notion of a Testament and the only use of it amongst men For the Apostle in this Epistle doth argue several times from such usages amongst men as proceeding from the Principles of Reason and Equity were generally prevalent among them So he doth in his discourse concerning the assurance given by the Oath of God Chap. 6. And here he doth the same from what was commonly agreed upon and suitable unto the reason of things about the nature and use of a Testament The things here mentioned were known to all approved by all and were the principal means of the preservation of Peace and Property in Humane Societies For although Testaments as unto their especial Regulation owe their original unto the Roman Civil Law yet as unto the substance of them they were in use amongst all Mankind from the foundation of the world For a Testament is the just determination of a Man's Will concerning what he will have done with his Goods after his decease Or it is the Will of him that is dead Take this power from men and you root up the whole foundation of all industry and diligence in the world For what man will labour to increase his substance if when
gives it to whom he pleaseth of his own good Pleasure Acts 11. 18. 2 It is immediately collated on the Souls of men by Jesus Christ as a fruit of his Death and an effect of that All Power in Heaven and Earth which was bestowed on Him by the Father He gives Repentance to Israel Acts 3. 31. The Soveraign disposal of it is from the Will of the Father and the actual Collation of it is an Effect of the Grace of the Son And 3 the Nature of it is expressed in the Conversion of the Gentiles It is unto Life Acts 11. 18. The Repentance required of men in the first Preaching of the Gospel and the Necessity whereof was pressed on them was unto Life that is such as had saving Conversion unto God accompanying of it This kind of Repentance is required unto our Initiation in the Gospel state Not an empty Profession of any kind of Repentance but real Conversion unto God is required of such persons But moreover we must consider this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Repentance in its own Nature at least in general that we may the better understand this first Principle of Catechetical Doctrine In this sense it respects 1 The Mind and Judgement 2 The Will and Affections And 3 The Life or Conversation of men 1. It respects the Mind and Judgement according to the Notation of the word which signifies a Change of Mind or an after Consideration and Judgement Men whilst they live in dead works under the Power of Sin do never make a right Judgement concerning either their Nature their Guilt or their End Hence are they so often called to remember and consider things aright to deal about them with the Reason of men and for want thereof are said to be Foolish Bruitish Sottish and to have no Understanding The Mind is practically deceived about them There are Degrees in this Deceit but all sinners are actually more or less deceived No men whilst the Natural Principle of Conscience remains in them can cast off all the Convictions of sin Rom. 2. 14 15. That it is the Judgement of God that those who commit such things are worthy of death Rom. 1. 32. But yet some there are who so far despise these Convictions as to give up themselves unto all sin with Delight and Greediness See Ephes. 4. 17 18 19. Practically they call Good Evil and Evil Good and do judge either that there is not that Evil in sin which is pretended or however that it is better to enjoy the Pleasures of it for a Season than to relinguish or forego it on other Considerations Others there are who have some farther sense of those Dead works In particular they judge them Evil but they are so intangled in them as that they see not the Greatness of that Evil nor do make such a Judgement concerning it as whereon a Reliquishment of them should necessarily ensue Unto these two heads in various Degrees may all Impenitent sinners be reduced They are such as despising their Convictions go on in an unbridled course of Licentiousness as not judging the Voyce Language and Mind of them worth enquiring into Others do in some measure attend unto them but yet practically they refuse them and embrace motives unto Sin turning the Scale on that side as Occasion Opportunities and Temptations do occur Wherefore the first thing in this Repentance is a through Change of the Mind and Judgement concerning these Dead works The Mind by the Light and Conviction of saving Truth determines clearly and steadily concerning the true Nature of Sin and its demerit that it is an Evil thing and bitter to have forsaken God thereby Casting on tall Prejudices laying aside all Pleas Excuses and Palliations it finally concludes Sin that is all and every Sin every thing that hath the Nature of Sin to be universally evil Evil in its Self Evil to the Sinner Evil in its present Effects and future Consequents Evil in every kind shamefully Evil incomparably Evil yea the only Evil or all that is Evil in the world And this Judgement it makes with respect unto the Nature and Law of God to its own Primitive and present depraved Condition unto present Duty and future Judgement This is the first thing required unto Repentance and where this is not there is nothing of it 2. It respects the Will and Affections It is our Turning unto God our turning from him being in the bent and inclination of our Wills and Affections unto Sin The Change of the Will or the taking away of the Will of sinning is the principal part of Repentance It is with respect unto our Wills that we are said to be dead in Sin and alienated from the Life of God And by this Change of the Will do we become dead unto Sin Rom. 6. 2. That is whatever remainder of Lust or Corruption there may be in us yet the Will of sinning is taken away And for the Affections it works that Change in the Soul as that quite contrary Affections shall be substituted and set at work with respect unto the same Object There are Pleasures in Sin and also it hath its wages With respect unto these those that live in dead works both delight in Sin and have complacency in the Accomplishment of it These are the Affections which the Soul exerciseth about Sin committed or to be committed Instead of them Repentance by which they are utterly banished sets at work Sorrow Grief Abhorrency Self detestation Revenge and the like Afflictive Passions of mind Nothing stirs but they affect the Soul with respect unto Sin 3. It respects the course of Life or Conversation It is a Repentance from dead works that is in the Relinquishment of them Without this no profession of Repentance is of any worth or use To profess a Repentance of Sin and to live in Sin is to mock God deride his Law and deceive our own Souls This is that Change which alone doth or can evidence the other internal Changes of the Mind Will and Affections to be real and sincere Prov. 28. 13. Whatever without this is pretended is false and Hypocritical like the Repentance of Judah not with the whole heart but feignedly Jerem. 3. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There was a lye in it for their works answered not their words Neither is there any mention of Repentance in the Scripture wherein this Change in an actual Relinquishment of dead works is not expresly required And hereunto three things are necessary 1 A full Purpose of Heart for the Relinquishment of every Sin This is cleaving unto the Lord with Purpose of Heart Acts 11. 23. Psal. 14. 3. To manifest the stability and stedfastness which is required herein David confirmed it with an Oath Psal. 119. 106. Every thing that will either live or thrive must have a Root on which it grows and whence it springs Other things may occasionally bud and put forth but they wither immediately And such is a Relinquishment of
confounded but after the manner of obstinate Infidels not converted Math. 22. 23 24. c. This was the principal Heresie of the Sadducees which drew along with it those other foolish Opinions of denying Angels and Spirits or the subsistence of the Souls of men in a separate condition Acts 23. 8. For they concluded well enough that the continuance of the Souls of men would answer no design of Providence or Justice if their bodies were not raised again And whereas God had now given the most illustrious testimony unto this truth in the Resurrection of Christ himself the Sadducees became the most inveterate Enemies unto him and Opposers of him For they not only acted against him and those who professed to believe in him from that Infidelity which was common unto them with most of their Country-men but also because their peculiar Heresie was everted and condemned thereby And it is usual with men of corrupt minds to prefer such peculiar errors above all other concerns of Religion whatever and to have their Lusts inflamed by them into the utmost intemperance They therefore were the first stirrers up and fiercest pursuers of the Primitive persecutions Acts 4. 1 2. The Sadducees came upon the Apostles being grieved that they taught the people and preached through Jesus the Resurrection from the dead The overthrow of their private Heresie was that which enraged them Chap. 5. 17 18. Then the High Priest rose up and all that were with him which is the Sect of the Sadducees and were filled with indignation and laid their hands on the Apostles and put them in the common Prison And an alike rage were the Pharisees put into about their Ceremonies wherein they placed their especial interest and glory And our Apostle did wisely make an advantage of this difference about the Resurrection between those two great Sects to divide them in their Counsels and Actings who were before agreed on his destruction on the common account of his preaching Jesus Christ Acts 23. 6 7 8 9. This Principle therefore both upon the account of its importance in its self as also of the opposition made unto it among the Jews by the Sadducees the Apostle took care to settle and establish in the first place As those truths are in an especial manner to be confirmed which are at any time peculiarly opposed And they had reason thus to do for all they had to preach unto the world turned on this hinge that Christ was raised from the dead whereon our Resurrection doth unavoidably follow so as that they confessed that without an eviction and acknowledgment hereof all their preaching was in vain and all their Faith who believed therein was so also 1 Cor. 15. 12 13 14. This therefore was always one of the first Principles which our Apostle insisted on in the preaching of the Gospel a signal instance whereof we have in his discourse at his first coming unto Athens First he reproves their Sins and Idolatries declaring that God by him called them to Repentance from those dead works Then taught them Faith in that God who so called them by Jesus Christ confirming the necessity of both by the Doctrine of the Resurrection from the dead and future judgement Acts 17. 18 23 24 30 31. He seems therefore here directly and summarily to lay down those principles in the order which he constantly preached them in his first declaration of the Gospel And this was necessary to be spoken concerning the nature and necessity of this Principle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Resurrection of the dead It is usually expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Resurrection only Mark 12. 18. Luke 20. 27 33. Joh. 11. 24. Math. 22. 23 28. For by this single expression the whole was sufficiently known and apprehended And so we commonly call it the Resurrection without any addition Sometimes it is termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 4. 2. The Resurrection from the dead that is the state of the dead Our Apostle hath a peculiar expression Chap. 11. 35. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They received their dead from the Resurrection that is by virtue thereof they being raised to Life again And sometimes it is distinguished with respect unto its consequents in different persons the good and the bad The Resurrection of the former is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 John 5. 29. the Resurrection of Life that is which is unto Life Eternal the means of entrance into it This is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Resurrection of the Just Luke 14. 14. And so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Life of the dead or the Resurrection of the dead was used to express the whole blessed estate which ensued thereon to Believers If by any means I might attain 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Resurrection of the dead This is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a living again as it is said of the Lord Christ distinctly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 14. 9. He rose and lived again or he arose to life With respect unto wicked men it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Resurrection of Judgement or unto Judgement Joh. 5. 29. Some shall be raised again to have Judgement pronounced against them to be sentenced unto punishment Reserve the unjust against the day of Judgement to be punished 2 Pet. 2. 9. And both these are put together Dan. 12. 2. And many of them that sleep in the dust of the Earth shall awake some to Everlasting Life and some to shame and Everlasting contempt This truth being of so great importance as that nothing in Religion can subsist without it the Apostles very diligently confirmed it in the first Churches And for the same cause it was early assaulted by Sathan denied and opposed by many And this was done two ways 1 By an open denial of any such thing 1 Cor. 15. 12. How say some among you that there is no Resurrection of the dead They wholly denied it as a thing improbable and impossible as is evident from the whole ensuing disputation of the Apostle on that subject 2 Others there were who not daring to oppose themselves directly unto a principle so generally received in the Church they would still allow the expression but put an Allegorical Exposition upon it whereby they plainly overthrew the thing intended They said the Resurrection was past already 2 Tim. 2. 18. It is generally thought that these men Hymeneus and Philetus placed the Resurrection in Conversion or Reformation of Life as the Marcionits did afterwards What some imagine about the Gnosticks is vain And that the reviving of a new Light in us is the Resurrection intended in the Scripture some begin to mutter among our selves But that as Death is a separation or sejunction of the Soul and the Body so that the Resurrection is a re-union of them in and unto Life the Scripture is too express for any one to deny and not virtually to reject it wholly And it may be observed that our Apostle in
their sins alway for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost And they are even blind themselves who see not this to be the condition of many in the world at this day 3 There are especial sins that are peculiar to this sort of barren Persons and so also Aggravations of sins that others contract not the Guilt of Now this state and condition at least the utmost and highest Danger of it is so written on the Foreheads of most that are called Christians in the world that there is no need of making any Application of it unto them And although it be not for us to know times and seasons or to set bounds and limits to the Patience of Christ yet have we just reason to dread the speedy breaking forth of his severity in Judgement Spiritual or Temporal upon most Nations and Churches that are called by his Name But the Duty it is of those who make profession of the Gospel in a peculiar manner to enquire diligentl ywhether there be not growing in their own Hearts and Ways any such sins as are usually consequent unto Barrenness under the Word If it prove so upon search they may justly fear that God is beginning to revenge upon them the neglect of the Gospel and unprofitableness under it There are Degrees of this sin and its consequents as we shall shew afterwards that the Evidences and Effects of Gods displeasure against it are progressive and gradual also From some of these the sinner is recoverable by Grace from some of them he is not at least ordinarily but is inevitably bound over to the Judgement of the great day But the last Degree is such as men ought to tremble at who have the least care for or love unto their immortal Souls For whatever issue of things God may have provided in the purpose of his Grace the Danger unto us is inexpressible And there neither is nor can be unto any the least Evidence Token or Hope that God designs them any Relief whilst themselves are careless and negligent in the use of means for their own deliverance It may therefore be enquired by what sort of sins this condition may be known in more strict Professors than the common sort of Christians in the world and how their Barrenness under the Gospel may be discovered thereby as the Cause by its Effects and inseparable consequents I shall therefore name some of those sins and ways with respect whereunto such Persons ought to be exceeding jealous over themselves As 1 An Indulgence unto some secret pleasant or profitable Lust or Sin with an Allowance of themselves therein That this may befall such persons we have too open Evidence in the frequent Eruptions and Discoveries of such Evils in sundry of them Some through a long continuance in a course of the practice of private sins are either surprised into such Acts and Works of it as are made publick whether they will or no being hardened in them do turn off to their avowed Practice Some under Terrors of mind from God fierce Reflections of Conscience especially in great Afflictions and Probabilities of Death do voluntarily acknowledge the secret Evils of their Hearts and Lives And some by strange and unexpected Providences God brings to Light discovering the hidden works of Darkness wherein men have taken delight Such things therefore there may be amongst them who make a more than ordinary Profession in the world For there are or may be Hypocrites among them Vessels in the House of God of Wood and Stone And some who are sincere and upright may yet be long captivated under the power of their Corruptions and Temptations And for the sake of such it is principally that this warning is designed Take heed lest there be in any of you a growing secret Lust or Sin wherein you indulge your selves or which you approve If there be so it may be there is more in it than you are aware of nor will your delivery from it be so easie as you may imagine God seldom gives up men unto such a way but it is an Effect of his displeasure against their Barrenness He declares therein that he doth not approve of their Profession Take heed lest it prove an Entrance into the dreadful Judgement ensuing Whatever therefore it be let it not seem small in your Eyes There is more Evil in the least allowed sin of a Professor I mean that is willingly continued in than in the loud and great provocations of open sinners For besides other Aggravations it includes a mocking of God And this very Caution I now insist upon is frequently pressed on all Professors by our Apostle in this very Epistle chap. 3. 11. chap. 12. 15 16. 2 Constant neglect of private secret Duties This also may be justly feared lest it be an Effect of the same cause Now by this Neglect I mean not that which is Universal For it is sure hard to meet with any one who hath so much Light and Conviction as to make Profession of Religion in any way but that he will and doth pray and perform other secret Duties at one time or another Even the worst of men will do so in Afflictions Fears Dangers with Surprisals and the like Nor do I intend interruptions of Duties upon unjustifiable occasions which though a sin which men ought greatly to be humbled for and which discovers a superfluity of Naughtiness yet remaining in them yet is it not of so destructive a Nature as that which we treat about I intend therefore such an Omission of Duties as is general where men do seldom or never perform them but when they are excited and pressed by outward Accidents or Occasions That this may befall Professors the Prophet declares Isa. 43. 22 23. And it argues much Hypocrisie in them The principal Character of an Hypocrite being that he will not pray always Nor can there be any greater Evidence of a personal barrenness than this Neglect A man may have a Ministerial fruitfulness and a Personal barrenness so he may have a Family usefulness and a Personal thriftlesness And hereof Negligence in private Duties is the greatest Evidence Men also may know when those sins are consequences of their Barrenness and to be reckoned among the Thorns and Briars intended in the Text. They may do it I say by the difficulty they will meet withall in their Recovery if it be so Have their failings and negligence been occasional meerly from the Impression of present Temptations a through watering of their Minds and Consciences from the Word will enable them to cast off their snares and to recover themselves unto a due performance of their Duties But if these things proceed from Gods Dereliction of them because of their barrenness whatever they may think and resolve their Recovery will not be so facile God will make them sensible how foolish and evil a thing it is to forsake him under the means of fruitful Obedience They may think like Sampson to go forth
of Righteousness is he who is the Author Cause and Dispenser of Righteousness unto others As God is said to be the Lord our Righteousness And so is the King of Peace also in which sence God is called the God of Peace Thus was it with Melchisedec as he was the Representative of Jesus Christ. 4. The last thing that the Apostle Observes from these Names and Titles in their Order wherein it is Natural that the Name of a Man should precede the Title of his Rule First King of Righteousness and afterwards King of Peace Righteousness must go first and then Peace will follow after So it is Promised of Christ and his Kingdom that in his days the Righteous shall flourish and abundance of Peace so long as the Moon endureth Psal. 72. 7. First they are made Righteous and then they have Peace And Isa. 32. 17. The work of Righteousness shall be Peace and the effect of Righteousness Quietness and Peace for ever This is the Order of these things There is no Peace but what proceedeth from and is the Effect of Righteousness So these things with respect unto Christ are declared by the Psalmist Psal. 85. 9 10 11 12 13. What we are taught hence is 1. That the Lord Jesus Christ is the only King of Righteousness and Peace unto the Church See Isa. 32. 1 21. Chap. 9. 6. He is not only a Righteous and Peaceable King as were his Types Melchisedec and Solomon but he is the Author Cause Procurer and Dispenser of Righteousness and Peace to the Church So is it declared Jer. 23. 5 6. Behold the Days come saith the Lord that I will raise unto David a Righteous Branch and a King shall Reign and Prosper and shall Execute Judgment and Justice in the Earth In his Days Judah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is his Name whereby he shall be called The Lord our Righteousness He is Righteous and Reigneth Righteously but this is not all he is the Lord our Righteousness VII The Apostle proceeds yet unto other Instances in the Description of Melchisedec wherein he was made like unto the Son of God ver 3. Without Father without Mother without Descent having neither beginning of Days nor end of Life The things here asserted being at the first view strange and uncouth would administer occasion unto large Discourses and accordingly have been the Subject of many Enquiries and Conjectures But it is no way unto the Edification of those who are Sober and Godly to engage into any long Disputes about those things wherein all Learned sober Expositors are come to an Issue and Agreement as they are in general in this matter For it is granted that Melchisedec was a Man really and truly so and therefore of Necessity must have all these things for the Nature of Man after him who was first Created who yet also had beginning of Life and end of Days doth not exist without them Wherefore these things are not denied of him absolutely but in some sence and with respect unto some especial end Now this is with respect unto his Office therein or as he bare that Office he was without Father without Mother c. And how doth this appear that so it was with him It doth so because none of them is Recorded or mentioned in the Scripture which yet diligently Recordeth them concerning other Persons and in particular those who could not find and prove their Genealogies were by no means to be admitted unto the Priesthood Ezra 2. 61 62 63. And we may therefore by this Rule enquire into the particulars 1. It is said of him in the first place that he was without Father without Mother whereon part of the latter clause namely without beginning of Days doth depend But how could a Mortal Man come into the World without Father or Mother Man that is Born of a Woman is the Description of every Man what therefore can be intended The next word declares he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without Descent say we But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Generation a Descent a Pedigree not absolutely but Rehearsed Described Recorded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is he whose Stock and Descent is entered upon Record And so on the contrary 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not he who hath no Descent no Genealogy but he whose Descent and Pedigree is no where Entered Recorded Reckoned up Thus the Apostle himself plainly expresseth this word ver 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whose Descent is not counted that is reckoned up in Record Thus was Melchisedec without Father and Mother in that the Spirit of God who so strictly and exactly Recorded the Genealogies of other Patriarchs and Types of Christ and that for no less an end than to manifest the Truth and Faithfulness of God in his Promises speaks nothing unto this purpose concerning him He is introduced as it were one falling from Heaven appearing on a sudden Reigning in Salem and Officiating the Office of the Priesthood unto the High God 2. On the same Account is he said to be without beginning of Days or end of Life For as he was a Mortal Man he had both He was assuredly Born and did no less certainly dye than other Men. But neither of these are Recorded concerning him We have no more to do with him to learn from him nor are concerned in him but only as he is Described in the Scripture and there is no mention therein of the Beginning of his Days or the end of his Life Whatever therefore he might have in himself he had none to us Consider all the other Patriarchs mentioned in the Writings of Moses and you shall find their Descent Recorded who was their Father and so upwards unto the first man and not only so but the time of their Birth and Death the Beginning of their Days and the End of their Lives is exactly Recorded For it is constantly said of them such an one Lived so long and begat such a Son which fixed the time of Birth Then of him so begotten it is said he lived so many Years which determines the end of his Days These things are expressely Recorded But concerning Melchisedec none of these things are spoken No mention is made of Father or Mother no Genealogy is Recorded of what Stock or Progeny he was nor is there any Account of his Birth or Death So that all these things are wanting unto him in this Historical Narration wherein our Faith and Knowledge is alone concerned Some few things may yet farther be enquired into for the clearing of the sence of these words 1. Whereas the Observation of the Apostle is built upon the silence of Moses in the History which was sufficient for him whatever was the Cause and Reason of that silence we may enquire whence it was Whence it was I say that Moses should introduce so great and excellent a Person as Melchisedec without any mention of his Race or Stock of his
Interest in the Priesthood as it was Established by Law 2. He had no Genealogy upon the Priestly Line And that which is Recorded of him on other accounts is so far from having respect unto his Right unto the Priesthood of the Law that it directly proves and demonstrates that he had none For his Genealogy is evidently of the Tribe of Judah which was excluded Legally from that Office as we have besides the Institution an Instance in King Uzziah 2 Chron. 26. 16 17 18. from Exod. 30. 7. Numb 18. 7. Hence our Apostle concludes That had he been on the Earth that is under the Order of the Law he could not have been a Priest there being others who by virtue of their Descent had alone the Right thereunto Heb. 8. 3 4. Wherefore God in these things Instructed the Church that he would erect a Priesthood which should no way depend on Natural Generation Descent or Genealogy whence it inevitably follows that the state of the Priesthood under the Law was to cease and to give place unto another which our Apostle principally designs to prove 3. In this respect also the Lord Christ was without Beginning of Days and End of Life For although in his Humane Nature he was both Born and Died yet he had a Priesthood which had no such Beginning of Days as that it should be traduced from any other to him nor shall ever cease or be delivered over from him unto any other but abides unto the consummation of all things In these things was Melchisedec made like unto Christ whom the Apostle here calls the Son of God made like unto the Son of God I have formerly observed in this Epistle that the Apostle makes mention of the Lord Christ under various Appellations on various Occasions so that in one place or another he makes Use of all the Names whereby he is signified in the Scripture Here he calls him the Son of God and that 1. To intimate that although Melchisedec were an Excellent Person yet was he infinitely beneath him whom he Represented even the Son of God He was not the Son of God but he had the Honour in so many things to be made like unto him 2. To declare how all these things which were any way Represented in Melchisedec or couched in the Story or left unto Enquiry by the vail of silence drawn over them could be fulfilled in our High Priest And it was from hence namely that he was the Son of God By virtue hereof was he capable of an always-living abiding uninterrupted Priesthood although as to his Humane Nature he once died in the Discharge of that Office This Description being given of the Person treated of which makes up the Subject of the Proposition it is affirmed concerning him that he abideth a Priest for ever For any thing we find in the Story of his Death or the Resignation of his Office or the Succession of any one unto him therein he abideth a Priest for ever Some I find have been venturing at some obscure Conjectures of the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Melchisedec in Heaven But I cannot perceive that they well understood themselves what they intended Nor did they consider that the real continuance of the Priesthood for ever in the Person of Melchisedec is as inconsistent with the Priesthood of Christ as the continuance of the same Office in the Line of Aaron But things are so related concerning him in the Scripture as that there is no mention of the ending of the Priesthood of his Order nor of his own Personal Administration of his Office by Death or otherwise Hence is he said to abide a Priest for ever This was that which our Apostle principally designed to confirm from hence namely that there was in the Scripture before the Institution of the Aaronical Priesthood a Representation of an Eternal unchangeable Priesthood to be introduced in the Church which he demonstrates to be that of Jesus Christ. It may not be amiss in the close of this Exposition of these Verses summarily to represent the several particulars wherein the Apostle would have us to observe the likeness between Melchisedec and Christ or rather the especial Excellencies and Properties of Christ that were Represented in the Account given of the Name Reign Person and Office of Melchisedec As 1. He was said to be and he really was and he only first the King of Righteousness and then the King of Peace seeing he alone brought in Everlasting Righteousness and made Peace with God for Sinners And in his Kingdom alone are these things to be found 2. He was really and truly the Priest of the High God and properly he was so alone He offered that Sacrifice and made that Attonement which was signified by all the Sacrifices Offered by Holy Men from the Foundation of the World 3. He Blesseth all the Faithful as Abraham the Father of the Faithful was Blessed by Melchisedec In him were they to be Blessed by him are they Blessed through him delivered from the Curse and all the Fruits of it nor are they Partakers of any Blessing but from him 4. He receiveth all the Homage of his People all their grateful Acknowledgments of the Love and Favour of God in the Conquest of their Spiritual Adversaries and Deliverance from them as Melchisedec received the Tenth of the Spoils from Abraham 5. He was really without Progenitors or Predecessors unto his Office nor would I exclude that Mystical sence from the intention of the place that he was without Father as to his Humane Nature and without Mother as to his Divine 6. He was a Priest without Genealogy or Derivation of his Pedigree from the Loyns of Aaron or any other that ever was a Priest in the World and moreover Mysteriously was of a Generation which none can declare 7. He had in his Divine Person as the High Priest of the Church neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life as no such thing is reported of Melchisedec For the Death which he underwent in the Discharge of his Office being not the death of his whole Person but of his Humane Nature only no Interruption of his endless Office did ensue thereon For although the Person of the Son of God died whence God is said to Redeem his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. yet he died not in his whole Person But as the Son of man was in Heaven whilst he was speaking on the Earth John 3. 13. namely he was so in his Divine Nature so whilst he was dead in the Earth in his Humane Nature the same Person was alive in his Divine Absolutely therefore nor in respect of his Office he had neither Beginning of Days nor end of Life 8. He was really the Son of God as Melchisedec in many Circumstances was made like to the Son of God 9. He alone abideth a Priest for ever whereof we must particularly treat afterwards The Doctrinal Observations that may be taken from these Verses
others will one way or other be brought down beneath them all 3. Let such be greatly Fruitful or this appearance of much Grace will issue in much darkness Secondly God dealeth thus with Men as to Spiritual Gifts Among those who are called the Spirit divideth unto every one even as he will Unto one he giveth five Talents unto another two and to a third but one And this diversity depending meerly on Gods Soveraignty is visible in all Churches And as this tends in it self unto their Beauty and Edification so there may be an abuse of it unto their disadvantage For besides those disorders which the Apostle declares to have ensued particularly in the Church of Corinth upon the undue Use and Exercise of Spiritual Gifts there are sundry Evils which may befall particular Persons by reason of them if their Original and End be not duly attended unto For 1. Those who have received these Spiritual Gifts in any Eminent manner may be apt to be lifted up with good Conceits of themselves and even to despise their Brethren who come behind them therein This Evil was openly prevalent in the Church of Corinth 2. Among those who have received them in some Equality or would be thought so to have done Emulations and perhaps Strifes thereon are apt to ensue One cannot well bear that the Gift of another should find more Acceptance or be better Esteemed than his own And another may be apt to extend himself beyond his due line and measure because of them And 3. Those who have received them in the lowest degree may be apt to despond and refuse to Trade with what they have because their Stock is Inferiour unto their Neighbours But what is all this to us May not God do what he will with his own If God will have some of the Sons of Abraham to pay Tithes and some to receive them is there any Ground of Complaint Unto him that hath the most Eminent Gifts God hath given of his own and not of ours he hath taken nothing from us to endue him withal but supplyed him out of his own stores Whoever therefore is unduly Exalted with them or Envies because of them he despiseth the Prerogative of God and contends with him that is Mighty 3. God distinguisheth Persons with Respect unto Office He makes and so accounts whom he will Faithful and puts them into Ministry This of Old Korah repined against And there are not a few who free themselves from Envy at the Ministry by endeavouring to bring it down into contempt But the Office is Honourable and so are they by whom it is discharged in a due manner and it is the Prerogative of God to call whom he pleaseth thereunto And there is no greater Usurpation thereon than the Constitution of Ministers by the Laws Rules and Authority of Men. For any to set up such in Office as he hath not Gifted for it nor called unto it is to sit in the Temple of God and to shew themselves to be God We may also hence observe That No Priviledge can exempt Persons from Subjection unto any of Gods Institutions Though they were of the Loyns of Abraham Yet VER 6 7 8 9 10. IN the five following Verses the Apostle pursues and Concludes that part of his Argument from the Consideration of Melchisedec which concerned the Greatness and Glory of him who was Represented by him and his Preeminence above the Levitical Priests For if Melchisedec who was but a Type of him was in his own Person in so many Instances more Excellent than they how much more must he be esteemed to be above them who was Represented by him For he whom another is appointed to represent must be more Glorious than he by whom he is represented This part of his Argument the Apostle concludes in these Verses and thence proceeds unto another great Inference and Deduction from what he had taught concerning this Melchisedec And this was that which strook unto the heart of that Controversie which he had in hand namely that the Levitical Priesthood must necessarily cease upon the Introduction of that better Priesthood which was fore-signified by that of Melchisedec And these things whatsoever sence we now have of them were those on which the Salvation or Damnation of these Hebrews did absolutely depend For unless they were prevailed on to forgoe that Priesthood which was now abolished and to betake themselves alone unto that more Excellent which was then Introduced they must unavoidably perish as accordingly on this very account it fell out with the Generality of that People their Posterity persisting in the same Unbelief unto this day And that which God made the Crisis of the Life and Death of that Church and People ought to be diligently weighed and considered by us It may be some find not themselves much concerned in this Laborious acurate Dispute of the Apostle wherein so much occurrs about Pedigrees Priests and Tithes which they think belongs not unto them But let them remember that in that great Day of taking down the whole Fabrick of Mosaical Worship and the Abolition of the Covenant of Sinai the Life and Death of that Ancient Church the Posterity of Abraham the Friend of God to whom unto this Season an inclosure was made of all Spiritual Priviledges Rom. 9. 4. depended upon their receiving or rejecting of the Truth here contended for And God in like manner doth often-times single out especial Truths for the Trial of the Faith and Obedience of the Church in especial Seasons And when he doth so there is ever after an especial Veneration due unto them But to return Upon the Supposition that the Levitical Priests did receive Tithes as well as Melchisedec wherein they were equal and that they received Tithes of their Brethren the Posterity of Abraham which was their especial Prerogative and Dignity he yet proveth by four Arguments that the Greatness he had assigned unto Melchisedec and his Preeminence above them was no more than was due unto him And the first of these is taken from the Consideration of his Person of whom he received Tithes ver 6. The Second from the Action of Benediction which accompanied his receiving of Tithes ver 7. The Third from the Condition and state of his own Person compared with all those who received Tithes according to the Law ver 8. And the Fourth from that which determines the whole Question namely that Levi himself and so consequently all the whole Race of Priests that sprang from his Loyns did thus pay Tithes unto him VER 6 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Aethiopick Translation omits those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He takes up the Name Abraham in the fore-going Verse who came forth out of the Loyns of Abraham and adds unto them what follows in this who received the Promise possibly deceived by a maimed transcript of the Original 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He who is not written in their Genealogies
Religion But the Truth is if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here signifies a certain and determinate place that opposed in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there must be Salem where Melchisedec dwelt which was not only afterwards Tithable as within the Bounds of Canaan but most probably was Hierusalem it self as we have declared This Conjecture therefore is too Curious nor do we need to tye up our selves unto the precise signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 although that also be sometimes used with respect unto time as well as place VVherefore these words here and there do express the several different states under Consideration Here is in the case of the Levitical Priesthood and There respects the case of Melchisedec as stated Gen. 14. Secondly The Foundation of the Comparison that wherein both agreed is in this that they received Tithes It is expressed of the one sort only namely the Levitical Priests they received Tithes but it is understood of the other also whereon the word is repeated and inserted in our Translation but there he receiveth them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They do receive Tithes in the Present Tense But it may be said there was none that then did so or at least de jure could do so seeing the Law of Tithing was abolished Wherefore an Enallage may be allowed here of the present time for that which was past they do that is they did so whilst the Law was in force But neither is this Necessary For as I have before Observed the Apostle admits or takes it for granted that the Mosaical System of Worship was yet continued and argueth on that concession unto the Necessity of its approaching abolition And yet we need not here the Use of this Supposition For the words determine neither time nor place but the state of Religion under the Law According unto the Law are Tithes to be paid unto and received by such Persons This therefore is agreed That both the Levitical Priests and Melchisedec received Tithes The Opposition and Difference lyes in the Qualification and Properties of them by whom they are received For 1. Those on the one side that is of the Levitical Priesthood were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Homines qui moriuntur or homines morientes Men that dye dying men that is Men subject unto Death Mortal men who lived and dyed in the Discharge of their Office according unto the Common Laws of Mortality And the Observation of Schlictingius on these words is as far as I can understand Useless unto his own Design much more to the Apostles Notandum vero quod non mortalibus hominibus sed morientibus tantum Melchisedecum Author opponat nec immortalem eum esse sed vivere dicit vita autem non mortalitati sed morti proprie opponitur Something is aimed at in way of Security unto another Opinion namely that all men were Created in a state of Mortality without respect unto Sin But nothing is gotten by this Subtility For by Dying men the Apostle intends not Men that were actually dying as it were at the point of Death For in that Condition the Priests could neither execute their Office nor receive Tithes of the People Only he describes such Persons as in the whole course of their Ministry were liable unto Death from the Common Condition of Mortality and in their several Seasons dyed accordingly Wherefore dying men or men Subject to Death and Mortal men are in this case the same And although Life as to the Principle of it be opposed unto Death yet as unto a continual Duration the thing here intended by the Apostle it is opposed unto Mortality or an obnoxiousness unto Death For a Representation is designed of him who was made a Priest not after the Law of a Carnal Commandment but after the Power of an endless Life Wherefore saith the Apostle those who received Tithes after the Law were all of them Mortal men that had both Beginning of Days and End of Life So the Death of Aaron the first of them and in him of all his Successors is Recorded in the Scripture In Opposition unto this state of the Levitical Priests it is affirmed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Case of Melchisedec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is Witnessed that he Liveth How he Liveth and how it is Witnessed unto that he Liveth we must Enquire For it is apparently of Melchisedec of whom in the first place as the Type these things are spoken and yet we know that really and in his own Person he was Dead long before But there are several things on the Account whereof it is said that it is witnessed that he Liveth For 1. Whatever the Scripture is silent in as to Melchisedec which it usually relates of others in the like state our Apostle takes for a Contrary Testimony unto him For he lays down this general Principle That what the Scripture conceals of Melchisedec it doth it to Instruct us in the Mystery of his Person and Ministry as Types of Christ and his Hence the Silence of the Scripture in what it useth to express must in this case be Interpreted as a Testimony unto the contrary So it witnessed of him that he was without Father without Mother without Descent in that it mentioneth none of them And whereas he had neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life Recorded in the Scripture it is thereby witnessed that not absolutely but as to his Typical consideration he Liveth For there are no bounds nor periods fixed unto his Priesthood nor did it expire by the bringing in that of Levi as that did by the Introduction of Christ's 2. He did actually continue his Office unto the end of that Dispensation of God and his Worship wherein he was employed and this witnesseth the perpetuity of his Life in opposition unto the Levitical Priests For these two States are compared by the Apostle that of Melchisedec and that of Levi. There was a time limited unto this Priesthood in the House of Aaron and during that time one Priest died and another Succeeded in several Generations until they were greatly multiplyed as the Apostle observeth ver 23. But during the whole Dispensation of things with respect unto Melchisedec he continued in his own Person to execute his Office from first to last without being Subject unto Death wherein it is witnessed that he Liveth 3. He is said to Live that is always to do so because his Office continueth for ever and yet no meer Mortal Man Succeeded him therein 4. In this whole Matter he is considered not Absolutely and Personally but Typically and as a Representation of somewhat else And what is Represented in the Type but is really subjectively and properly found only in the Antitype may be affirmed of the Type as such So it is in all Sacramental Institutions as the Paschal Lamb was called expressely Gods Passover Exod. 12. 11. when it was only a Pledge and Token thereof as under the New
Testament the Bread and Wine in the Sacred Supper are called the Body and Blood of Christ which they do Represent Thus it is true really and absolutely of our Lord Jesus Christ That he Liveth for ever that he is a Priest for ever which the Apostle much insisteth on and urgeth unto his purpose afterwards This Eternity or ever-living of Jesus Christ was Represented in Melchisedec in that it is not said any where in the Scripture that he dyed it is witnessed therefore that he Liveth because He whom he Represents doth really do so his own Death is not mentioned on purpose that he might so Represent him And the Apostle's Argument unto the Dignity and Preheminence of Melchisedec above the Levitical Priests in this Instance is of an unquestionable Evidence For consider Melchisedec not in his Natural Being and Existence which belongs not unto this Mystery but in his Scripture-Being and Existence and he is Immortal always Living wherein he is more Excellent than those who were always obnoxious unto Death in the Exercise of their Office And from the branches of this Comparison we may take two Observations 1. In the outward Administration of his worship God is pleased to make Use of poor frail mortal dying men So he did of old and so he continues still to do Our Fathers where are they and the Prophets do they Live for ever Zech. 1. 5. The Prophets of old the most Eminent Administrators under the Old Testament they were all mortal dying men and whilst they lived in this World they were Subject unto like Passions with other Men James 5. 17. And the same account the Apostle giveth us of the Principal Administrators of the New Testament 2 Cor. 4. 8 9 10 11 12. Chap. 6. 8 9. And we know it is so with all those into whose hands the same work is transmitted Yea oft-times as to the Infirmities of Body and outward Condition their weakness and frailty are signalized above others Nor doth any Advantage accrue to the Gospel by the Secular Exaltations of such as pretend unto the same Employment wherein without other Qualifications they do little resemble the Ministry of Christ himself Such I say doth God please to make Use of Persons obnoxious unto all Infirmities and Temptations with all other Believers and equally with them falling under the stroke of Mortality He could have accomplished his whole Design immediately by his Grace and Spirit without the Institution of any Administrators He could have employed his Holy Angels in the Declaration and Dispensation of the Gospel or he could have raised up Men so signalized with Wisdom and all endowments of Mind and Body as should have eminently distinguished them from the whole Race of Mankind besides But waving these and all other ways possible and easie unto his Infinite Wisdom and Power he hath chosen to make Use in this great Occasion of Poor Infirm Frail Tempted Sinning Dying men And sundry Reasons of this his Holy Councel are expressed in the Scripture 1. He doth it to make it Evident that it is his own Power and nothing else which gives Efficacy and Success unto all Gospel-Administrations 2 Cor. 4. 7. VVe have this Treasure in Earthen Vessels that the Excellency of the Power may be of God and not of us There is an Excellency of Power accompanieth the Dispensation of the VVord Mighty Spiritual Effects are produced by it such as wherein the Glory of God doth consist and whereon the Eternal welfare of the Souls of Men doth depend This Glory in subduing the Adverse Power of Sin Satan and the World in the Quickening Sanctifying Saving the Souls of the Elect God will be seen and owned in he will not give it unto another Whereas therefore those by whom these Treasures are communicated unto others are frail perishing Earthen Vessels or those by whom the Gospel is dispensed are poor frail weak men seen and known so to be there is no veil by their Ministry cast over the Glory of God There is not a Soul Convinced Converted or Comforted by their Word but they may truly say of it as the Apostles did of the Miracle which they wrought Acts 3. 12. Why look ye so on us as though by our own Power and Holiness we made this man walk This Blind Man to see this Dead Man to live By the Consideration of our meanness all may discern that the Excellency of this Power is of God and not of us Yea for this very End our Apostle refused to make Use of such a perswasiveness of words and exercise of VVisdom as might give any Appearance or Countenance unto such an Apprehension as though by them this Effect were produced 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. My Speech and my Preachings was not with enticing words of mans wisdom but in demonstration of Spirit and of Power that your Faith should not stand in the wisdom of Man but in the Power of God And herein ought he to be an Example unto us all But it is come to that with many that being destitute utterly of what he had namely and ability to dispense the word in the Demonstration of the Spirit and of Power do wholly betake themselves unto what he refused or the enticing words of Mans wisdom according to their Ability But what the Jews spoke Blasphemously of Christ upon his opening the Eyes of him who was Born Blind may in a sence be truly spoken of any of us upon the opening of the Eyes of them that were Spiritually Blind Give God the praise we know that this man is a Sinner 2. God hath so Ordered things in VVisdom and Grace that the Administrators of Holy things unto others might have Experience in themselves of their State and Condition so as to be moved with Compassion towards them Care about them and Zeal for them VVithout these Graces and this constant Exercise Men will be but very useless Instruments in this work And they will not grow any where but in Mens own Experience For how shall he be Tender Compassionate Careful towards the Souls of others who knows no Reason why he should be so towards his own The High Priest of Old was such an one as could have Compassion on the Ignorant and them that are out of the way for that he himself was encompassed with Infirmity Heb. 5. 2. And therein was he a Type of Christ who was in all points Tempted as we are that he might be ready to Succour them that are Tempted This gave him the Experience of Compassion in the Exercise of it VVherefore when a Minister of the Gospel knows his own VVeakness Infirmities and Temptations his need of Mercy and Grace the ways of his obtaining Supplies of them the danger of the Snares which he is exposed unto the value of his own Soul the Preciousness of the Blood of Christ and Excellency of the Eternal Reward he cannot considering the Charge committed unto him and the Duty required of him but be moved with Pity Compassion
Tenderness Love and Zeal towards those unto whom he doth Administer especially considering how greatly their Eternal welfare depends on his Ability Diligence and Faithfulness in the Discharge of his Duty And this proves on sundry accounts greatly to the Advantage of the poor Tempted Disciples of Christ. For it makes a Representation unto them of his own Compassion and Love as the great Shepherd of the Sheep Isa. 40. 11. and causeth a needful Supply of Spiritual Provisions to be always in readiness for them and that to be Administred unto them with Experience of its Efficacy and Success 3. That the Power of Gospel-Grace and Truth may be exemplified unto the Eyes of them unto whom they are dispensed in the Persons of them by whom it is Administred according unto Gods Appointment It is known unto all who know ought in this matter what Temptations and Objections will arise in the minds of poor Sinners against their obtaining any Interest in the Grace and Mercy that is dispensed in the Gospel Some they judge may be made Partakers of them but for them and such as they are there seems to be no Relief provided But is it no Encouragement unto them to see that by Gods appointment the Tenders of his Grace and Mercy are made unto their Souls by Men Subject unto alike Passions with themselves and who if they had not freely obtained Grace would have been as vile and unworthy as themselves For as the Lord called the Apostle Paul to the Ministry who had been a Blasphemer a Persecutor and Injurious that he might in him shew forth all Long-suffering for a Pattern unto them who should hereafter believe on him to Everlasting Life that is for the Encouragement even of such high Criminal Offenders to Believe 1 Tim. 1. 13 14 15 16. So in more Ordinary Cases the Mercy and Grace which the Ministers of the Gospel did equally stand in need of with those unto whom they dispense it and have received it is for a Pattern Example and Encouragement of them to Believe after their Example 4. In particular God maketh Use of Persons that dye in this matter that their Testimony unto the Truth of Gospel-Grace and Mercy may be Compleat and unquestionable Death is the great Touch-stone and Trial of all things of this Nature as to their Efficacy and Sincerity Many things will yield Relief in Life and various Refreshments which upon the approach of Death vanish into nothing So it is with all the Comforts of this VVorld and with all things that have not an Eternal Truth and Substance in them Had not those therefore who dispense Sacred things been designed themselves to come unto this Touch-stone of their own Faith Profession and Preaching those who must dye and know always that they must do so would have been unsatisfied what might have been the Condition with them had they been brought unto it and so have ground to fear in themselves what will become of that Faith wherein they have been Instructed in the warfare of Death when it shall approach To obviate this Fear and Objection God hath Ordained that all those who Administer the Gospel shall all of them bring their own Faith unto that Last Trial that so giving a Testimony unto the Sincerity and Efficacy of the things which they have Preached in that they Commit the Eternal Salvation of their Souls unto them and higher Testimony none can give they may be Encouragements unto others to follow their Examples to imitate their Faith and pursue their Course unto the End And for this cause also doth God oft-times call them forth unto peculiar Trials Exercises Afflictions and Death it self in Martyrdom that they may be an Example and Encouragement unto the whole Church I cannot but Observe for a Close of this Discourse that as the unavoidable Infirmities of the Ministers of the Gospel managed and passed through in a course of Faith Holiness and Sincere Obedience are on many Accounts of singular Use and Advantage unto the Edification and Consolation of the Church so the Evil Examples of any of them in Life and Death with the want of those Graces which should be excited unto Exercise by their Infirmities is pernicious thereunto 〈…〉 2 The Life of the Church depends on the Everlasting Life of Jesus Christ. It is said of Melchisedec as he was a Type of him It is witnessed that he Liveth Christ doth so and that for ever and hereon under the Failings Infirmities and Death of all other Administrators depends the Preservation Life Continuance and Salvation of the Church But this must be spoken peculiarly on ver 27. whither it is remitted VER 9 10. It may be Objected unto the whole precedent Argument of the Apostle That although Abraham himself paid Tithes unto Melchisedec yet it followeth not that Melchisedec was Superiour unto the Levitical Priests concerning whom alone the Question was between him and the Jews For although Abraham might be a Priest in some sence also by virtue of common Right as were all the Patriarchs yet was he not so by virtue of any especial Office Instituted of God to abide in the Church But when God afterwards by peculiar Law and Ordinance Erected an Order and Office of Priesthood in the Family of Levi it might be Superiour unto or Exalted above that of Melchisedec although Abraham paid Tithes unto him This Objection therefore the Apostle obviates in these verses and therewithal giving his former Argument a farther Improvement he makes a Transition according unto his usual Custom as it hath been often Observed that it is his Method to do unto his especial Design in proving the Excellency of the Priesthood of Christ above that of the Law which is the main scope of this whole Discourse VER 9 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ut verbum dicere as to speak a word Vul. Lat. Ut ita dictum sit be it so said Syr. As any one may say Arab. And it is said that this Discourse or Reason may be some way ended Ut ita loquar as I may so speak In the rest of the words there is neither Difficulty nor Difference among Translators There are three things Observable in these words 1. The manner of the Introduction of the Apostle's new Assertion 2. The Assertion it self which hath the force of a new Argument unto his Purpose ver 9. And 3. The Proof of his Assertion in ver 10. The manner of the Introduction of his Assertion is in these words as I may so say This Qualification of the Assertion makes an abatement of it one way or other Now this is not as to the Truth of the Proposition but as to the Propriety of the Expression The words are as if that which is expressed was actually so namely that Levi himself paid Tithes whereas it was so only virtually The thing it self intended was with respect unto the Apostles purpose as if it had been so indeed though Levi not being
not the Design of God always to keep the Church in a state of Non-age and under School-Masiers he had appointed to set it at Liberty in the fulness of time to take his Children nearer unto him to give them greater Evidences of his Love greater Assurances of the Eternal Inheritance and the use of more Liberty and Boldness in his Presence But what this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Gospel is wherein it doth consist what is included in it what freedom of Spirit what liberty of Speech what Right of Access and Boldness of Approach unto God Built upon the removal of the Law the communication of the Spirit the way made into the Holyest by the Blood of Christ with other concernments of it Constitutive of Gospel-perfection I have already in part declared in Our Exposition on Chap. 3. ver 5. and must if God please yet more largely insist upon it on Chap. 10th so that I shall not here further speak unto it 5. A clear fore-sight into a Blessed estate of Immortality and Glory with unquestionable Evidences and Pledges giving Assurance of it belongs also to this Consummation Death was Originally threatned as the final End and Issue of sin And the Evidence hereof was received under the Levitical Priesthood in the Curse of the Law There was indeed a Remedy provided against its Eternal Prevalency in the first Promise For whereas Death comprised all the Evil that was come or was to come on Man for Sin In the day thou eatest thereof thou soal die The Promise contained the means of deliverance from it or it was no Promise tendred no Relief unto Man in the state whereinto he was fallen But the People under the Law could see but little into the manner and way of its Accomplishment nor had they received any Pledge of it in any one that was dead and lived again so as to die no more Wherefore their Apprehensions of this deliverance were dark and attended with much fear which rendred them obnoxious unto Bondage See the Exposition on Chap. 2. 14. where we have declared the dreadful Apprehensions of the Jews concerning Death received by Tradition from their Fathers They could not look through the dark shades of Death into Light Immortality and Glory See the two-fold Spirit of the Old and New Testament with respect unto the Apprehensions of Death expressed the one Job 10. 21 22. the other 2 Cor. 5. 1 2 3 4. But there is nothing more needful unto the perfect state of the Church Suppose it endowed with all possible Priviledges in this World yet if it have not a clear view and prospect with a Blessed assurance of Immortality and Glory after Death its condition will be dark and uncomfortable And as this could not be done without bringing in of another Priesthood so by that of Christs it is accomplished For 1. He himself died as our High Priest He entred into the devouring Jaws of Death and that as it was threatned in the Curse And now is the Trial to be made If he who thus ventured on Death as threatned in the Curse and that for us be swallowed up by it or detained by its Power and Pains there is a certain end of all our Hopes Whatever we may arrive unto in this World Death will convey us over into eternal Ruine But if he brake through its Power have the pains of it removed from him do swallow it up into Victory and rise Triumphantly into Immortality and Glory then is our entrance into them also even by and after Death secured And in the Resurrection of Christ the Church had the first unquestionable Evidence that Death might be Conquered that it and the Curse might be separated that there might be a free passage through it into Life and Immortality These things Originally and in the first Covenant were inconsistent nor was the Reconciliation of them evident under the Levitical Priesthood But hereby was the Veil rent from top to bottom and the most Holy place not made with hands laid open unto Believers See Isa. 25. 7 8. 2. As by his Death Resurrection and entrance into Glory He gave a Pledge Example and Evidence unto the Church of that in his own Person which he had designed for it so the Grounds of it were laid in the Expiatory Sacrifice which he Offered whereby he took away the Curse from Death There was such a close Conjunction between Death and the Curse such a Combination between Sin the Law and Death that the breaking of that Conjunction and the dissolving of that Combination was the greatest Effect of Divine Wisdom and Grace which our Apostle so Triumpheth in 1 Cor. 15. 54 55 56 57. This could no otherwise be brought about but by his being made a Curse in Death or bearing the Curse which was in Death in our stead Gal. 3. 13. 3. He hath clearly declared unto the utmost of our Capacities in this World that future state of Blessedness and Glory which he will lead all his Disciples into All the concernments hereof under the Levitical Priesthood were represented only under the obscure Types and Shadows of Earthly things But he hath abolished Death and brought Life and Immortality to light through the Gospel 2 Tim. 1. 10. He destroyed and abolished him who had the Power of Death in taking away the Curse from it Chap. 2. 14. And he abolished Death it self in the removal of those dark shades which it cast on Immortality and Eternal Life and hath opened an abundant entrance into the Kingdom of God and Glory He hath unveiled the uncreated Beauties of the King of Glory and opened the Everlasting Doors to give an insight into those Mansions of Rest Peace and Blessedness which are prepared for Believers in the Everlasting Enjoyment of God And these things constitute no small part of that consummate state of the Church which God designed and which the Levitical Priesthood could no way effect 6 There is also an especial Joy belonging unto this state For this Kingdom of God is Righteousness and Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost Neither was this attainable by the Levitical Priesthood Indeed many of the Saints of the Old Testament did greatly Rejoyce in the Lord and had the Joy of his Salvation abiding with them See Psal. 51. 12. Isa. 25. 9. Hab. 3. 17 18. But they had it not by virtue of the Levitical Priesthood Isaiah tells us that the ground of it was the swallowing up of Death in Victory ver 8. which was no otherwise to be done but by the Death and Resurrection of Christ. It was by an Influence of Efficacy from the Priesthood that was to be introduced that they had their Joy Whence Abraham saw the Day of Christ and Rejoyced to see it The Prospect of the Day of Christ was the sole Foundation of all their Spiritual Joy that was purely so But as unto their own present state they were allowed and called to Rejoyce in the abundance of Temporal things
had unto the whole System of those Laws and Institutions of Worship which our Apostle as was also before observed calls Carnal Ordinances imposed unto the Time of Reformation Chap. 9. 10. They were all Carnal in opposition unto the Dispensation of the Spirit under the Gospel and the Institutions thereof None of these ways was the Lord Christ made a Priest He was not dedicated unto his Office by the Sacrifice of Beasts but Sanctified himself thereunto when he Offered himself through the Eternal Spirit unto God and was consummate in his own Blood He was not of the Carnal Seed of Aaron nor did nor could claim any Succession unto the Priesthood by virtue of an Extraction from his Race And no constitution of the Law in general no Ordinance of it did convey unto him either Right or Title unto the Priesthood It is therefore Evident that he was in no sense made a Priest according to the Law of a Carnal Commandment neither had he either Right Power or Authority to exercise the Sacerdotal Function in the observation of any Carnal Rites or Ordinances whatever And we may observe That what seemed to be wanting unto Christ in his entrance into any of his Offices or in the Discharge of them was on the account of a greater Glory Aaron was made a Priest with a great outward Solemnity The Sacrifices which were Offered and the Garments he put on with his visible separation from the rest of the People had a great Ceremonial Glory in them There was nothing of all this nor any thing like unto it in the Consecration of the Lord Christ unto his Office But yet indeed these things had no Glory in comparison of that excelling Glory which accompanied those invisible Acts of Divine Authority VVisdom and Grace which communicated his Office unto him And indeed in the VVorship of God who is a Spirit all outward Ceremony is a diminution and debasement of it Hence were Ceremonies for Beauty and Glory multiplyed under the Old Testament but yet as the Apostle shews were all but Carnal But as the sending of Christ himself and his Investiture with all his Offices were by Secret and Invisible Acts of God and his Spirit so all Evangelical VVorship as to the Glory of it is Spiritual and Internal only And the removal of the Old Pompous Ceremonies from our VVorship is but the taking away of the Veil which hindred from an insight and entrance into the Holy place 2. The way and manner whereby the Lord Christ was made a Priest is expressed positively 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But according unto the Power of an indissoluble Life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denotes an Opposition between the way rejected and this asserted as those which were not consistent He was not made a Priest that way but this How is Christ then made a Priest according to the Power of an endless Life That is saith one in his Paraphrase installed into the Priesthood after his Resurrection VVhat is meant by installed I well know not It should seem to be the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Consecrated Dedicated Initiated And if so this Exposition diverts wholly from the Truth For Christ was installed into his Office of Priesthood before his Resurrection or he did not Offer himself as a Sacrifice unto God in his Death and Blood-shedding And to suppose that the Lord Christ discharged and performed the principal Act of his Sacerdotal Office which was but once to be performed before he was installed a Priest is contradictory to Scripture and Reason it self Ideo ad vitam im mortalem perductus est ut in aeternum sacrdos noster esset He was therefore brought unto an Immortal Life that he might be our Priest for ever saith another But this is not to be made a Priest according to the Power of an endless Life If he means that he might always continue to be a Priest and to execute that Office always unto the consummation of all things what he says is true but not the sence of this place but if he means that he became Immortal after his Resurrection that he might be our Priest and abide so for ever it excludes his Oblation in his Death from being a proper Sacerdotal Act which that it was I have sufficiently proved elsewhere against Crellius and others Some think that the endless life intended is that of Believers which the Lord Christ by virtue of his Priestly Office confers upon them The Priests under the Law proceeded no further but to discharge Carnal Rites which could not confer Eternal life on them for whom they Ministred But the Lord Christ in the Discharge of his Office procureth Eternal Redemption and Everlasting life for Believers And these things are true but they comprise not the meaning of the Apostle in this place For how can Christ be made a Priest according to the Power of that Eternal Life which he confers on others For the comparison and opposition that is made between the Law of a Carnal Commandment whereby Aaron was constituted a Priest and the Power of an endless Life whereby Christ was made so do Evidence that the making of Christ a Priest not absolutely which the Apostle treats not of but such a Priest as he is was the Effect of this endless Life VVherefore the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the indissoluble Life here intended is the life of Christ himself Hereunto belonged or from hence did proceed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Power whereby he was made a Priest And both the Office it self and the Execution or Discharge of it are here intended And as to the Office it self this Eternal or endless life of Christ is his life as the Son of God Hereon depends his own Mediatory life for ever and his conferring of Eternal life on us John 5. 26 27. And to be a Priest by virtue of or according unto this Power stands in direct opposition unto the Law of a Carnal Commandment It must therefore be enquired how the Lord Christ was made a Priest according unto this power And I say it was because thereby alone he was rendred meet to discharge that Office wherein God was to redeem his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. By Power therefore here both meetness and ability are intended And both these the Lord Christ had from his Divine Nature and his endless life therein Or it may be the Life of Christ in his Humane Nature is intended in opposition unto those Priests who being made so by the Law of a Carnal Commandment did not continue in the Discharge of their Office by reason of Death as our Apostle observes afterwards But it will be said that this Natural life of Christ the life of the Humane Nature was not Endless but had an End put unto it in the Dissolution of his Soul and Body on the Cross. I say therefore this life of Christ was not absolutely the life of the Humane Nature considered separately from his
is confirmed with an Oath is better than that which is not so which alone gives the proportion of comparison in this place Many other advantages there were of the Priesthood of Christ and of the New Testament in comparison unto those of old all which encrease the proportion of Difference but at present the Apostle considers only what depends on the Oath of God Wherefore the Design of the Comparison contained in those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is that whereas this Priest after the Order of Melchisedec was designed to be the Surety of another Testament he was confirmed in his office by the Oath of God which gives a Prcheminence both unto his Office and the Testament whereof he was to be a Surety In the Assertion it self that Jesus was made a Surety of a better Testament we may consider 1. what is included or supposed in it and 2. what is literally expressed Three things are included and supposed in this Assertion 1. That there was another Testament that God had made with his People 2. That this was a good Testament 3 That this Testament had in some sense a Surety As unto what is expressed in these words there are four things in them 1. The Name of him who was the subject discoursed of it is Jesus 2. What is affirmed of him he was a Surety 3. How he became so He was made so 4. Whereof he was a Surety and that is of a Testament of God Which 5. is described by its respect unto the other before mentioned and its preference above it it is a better Testament 1. It is supposed that there was another Testament which God had made with his People This the Apostle supposeth in this whole context and at length brings his discourse unto its Head and issue in the eighth Chapter where he expresly compareth the Two Testaments the one with the other Now this was the Covenant or Testament that God made with the Hebrews on Mount Sinai when he brought them out of Egypt as is expresly declared in the ensuing Chapters whereof we must treat in its proper place 2. It is supposed that this was a Good Testament It was so in it self as an effect of the Wisdom and Righteousness of God For all that he doth is good in it self both naturally and morally nor can it otherwise be And it was of Good Use unto the Church namely unto them who looked unto the end of it and used it in its proper design Unto the Body of the People indeed as far as they were carnal and looked only on the one hand for temporal Benefits by it or on the other for Life and Salvation it was an heavy yoke yea the Ministration of Death With respect unto such Persons and Ends it contained Statutes that were not Good Commandments that could not give Life and was every way unprofitable But yet in it self it was on many Accounts Good Just and Holy 1. As it had an Impression upon it of the Wisdom and Goodnesse of God 2 As it was instructive in the nature and demerit of Sin 3. As it directed unto and represented the only means of deliverance by Righteousnesse and Salvation in Christ. 4. As it established a Worship which was very Glorious and Acceptable unto God during its Season But as we shall shew afterwards it came short in all excellencies and worth of this whereof Christ is the Surety 3. It is supposed that this Testament had a Mediator For this New Testament having a Surety the other must have so also But who this was must be inquired 1. Some would have our Lord Jesus Christ to be the Surety of that Testament also For so our Apostle affirms in general There is one God and one Mediator between God and Man the Man Christ Jesus who gave himself a ransome for all to be Testified in due time 1 Tim. 2. 5 6. Be the Covenant or Testament what or which it will there is but one Mediator between God and Man Hence our Apostle says of him that Jesus Christ is the same yesterday to day and for ever Chap. 13. 8. If therefore he be the only Mediator to day under the New Testament he was so also yesterday under the Old Answ. 1. There is some difference between a Mediator at large and such a Mediator as is withal a Surety And however on any Account Christ may be said to be the Mediator of that Covenant he cannot be said to be the Surety of it 2. The place in Timothy cannot intend the Old Covenant but is exclusive of it For the Lord Christ is there called a Mediator with respect unto the Ransome that he paid in his death and bloodshedding This respected not the confirmation of the Old Covenant but was the Abolition of it and the Old was confirmed with the Blood of Beasts as the Apostle expresly declares Chap. 9. 18. 19. 3. The Lord Christ was indeed in his Divine Person the immediate Administrator of that Covenant the Angel and Messenger of it on the behalf of God the Father but this doth not constitute him a Mediator properly For a Mediator is not of one but God is one 4. The Lord Christ was a Mediator under that Covenant as to the original Promise of Grace and the efficacy of it which were administred therein but he was not the Mediator and Surety of it as it was a Covenant For had he been so he being the same yesterday to day and for ever that Covenant could have never been disanulled 2. Some assert Moses to have been the Surety of the Old Testament For so it is said that the Law was given by the Disposition of Angels in the hand of a Mediator Gal. 3. 19. That is of Moses whom the People desired to be the internuncius between God and them Exod. 20. 19. Deut. 5. 24. Chap. 18. 16. Answ. 1. Moses may be said to be the Mediator of the Old Covenant in a general sense inasmuch as he went between God and the People to declare the Will of God unto them and to return the profession of Obedience from them unto God But he was in no sense the Surety thereof For on the one side God did not appoint him in his stead to give Assurance of his fidelity unto the People This he took absolutly unto himself in those words wherewith all his Laws were prefaced I am the Lord thy God Nor did he nor could he on the other side undertake unto God for the People and so could not be esteemed in any sense the Surety of the Covenant 2. The Apostle hath no such argument in hand as to compare Christ with Moses nor is he treating of that Office wherein he compares him with him and prefers him above him which was his Prophetical Office whereof he had before discoursed Chap. 3 4 5 6 7. VVherefore 3. It was the High Priest alone who was the Surety of that Covenant It was made and confirmed by sacrifices Psal. 50. 5. as we
this you may call Gods making or establishing of it with us if you please though making of the Covenant in the Scripture is applyed only unto its Execution or actual Application unto Persons But this Declaration of the Grace of God and the Provision in the Covenant of the Mediator for the making of it effectual unto his Glory is most usually called the Covenant of Grace And this is twofold 1. In the way of a singular and absolute Promise as it was first declared unto and thereby established with Adam and afterwards with Abraham This is the Declaration of the Purpose of God or the free Determination of his VVill as to his dealing with sinners on the supposition of the fall and the forfeiture of their first Covenant state Hereof the Grace and VVill of God was the only Cause Heb. 8. 8. And the Death of Christ could not be the means of its procurement for he himself and all that he was to do for us was the substance of that Promise wherein this Declaration of Gods Grace and Purpose was made or of this Covenant of Grace which was introduced and established in the room of that which was broken and disanulled as unto the ends and benefits of a Covenant The substance of the first Promise wherein the whole Covenant of Grace was virtually comprized directly respected and expressed the giving of him for the Recovery of mankind from sin and misery by his Death Gen. 3. 15. VVherefore if he and all the benefits of his Mediation his Death and all the effects of it be contained in the Promise of the Covenant that is in the Covenant it self then was not his Death the procuring Cause of that Covenant nor do we owe it thereunto 2. In the additional prescription of the way and means whereby it is the will of God that we shall enter into a Covenant state with him or be interested in the benefits of it This being virtually comprized in the absolute Promise is expressed in other places by the way of the Conditions required on our part This is not the Covenant but the Constitution of the Terms on our part whereon we are made partakers of it Nor is the Constitution of these Terms an effect of the Death of Christ or procured thereby It is a meer effect of the Soveraign Wisdom and Grace of God The things themselves as bestowed on us communicated unto us wrought in us by Grace are all of them effects of the Death of Christ but the Constitution of them to be the Terms and Conditions of the Covenant is an Act of meer Soveraign Wisdom and Grace God so loved the VVorld as to send his only Begotten Son to dye not that Faith and Repentance might be the means of Salvation but that all his Elect might believe and all that believe might not perish but have Life Everlasting But yet it is granted that the Constitution of these Terms of the Covenant doth respect the federal Transactions between the Father and the Son wherein they were ordered to the Praise of the Glory of Gods Grace and so although their Constitution was not the Procurement of his Death yet without respect unto it it had not been VVherefore the sole cause of making the New Covenant in any sense was the same with that of giving Christ himself to be our Mediator namely the Purpose Counsel Goodnesse Grace and Love of God as it is every where expressed in the Scripture It may be therefore enquired what respect the Covenant of Grace hath unto the Death of Christ or what Influence it hath thereunto I Answer it hath a threefold respect thereunto 1. In that it was confirmed ratified and made irrevocable thereby This our Apostle insists upon at large Chap. 9. ver 15 16 17 18 19 20. And he compares his Blood in his Death and sacrifice of himself unto the sacrifices and their Blood whereby the old Covenant was confirmed purified dedicated or established ver 18 19. Now these sacrifices did not procure that Covenant or prevail with God to enter into it but only ratified and confirmed it and this was done in the New Covenant by the Blood of Christ in the way that shall be afterwards declared 2. He thereby underwent and performed all that which in the Righteousnesse and VVisdome of God required that the Effects Fruits Benefits and Grace intended designed and prepared in the New Covenant might be effectually accomplished and communicated unto sinners Hence although he procured not the Covenant for us by his Death yet he was in his Person Mediation Life and Death the only Cause and Means whereby the whole Grace of the Covenant is made effectual unto us For 3. All the Benefits of it were procured by him that is all the Grace Mercy Priviledges and Glory that God had prepared in the Counsel of his VVill and proposed in the Covenant or promises of it are purchased merited and procured by his Death and effectually communicated or applyed unto all the Covenanters by vertue thereof with other of his Mediatory Acts. And this is much more an eminent procuring of the New Covenant than what is pretended about the procurement of its Terms and Conditions For if he should have procured no more but this if we owe this only unto his Mediation that God would thereon and did grant and establish this Rule Law and Promise that Whosoever believed should be saved it was possible that no one should be saved thereby yea if he did no more considering our state and condition it was impossible that any one should so be These things being premised we shall now briefly declare how or wherein he was the Surety of the Covenant as he is here called A Surety Sponsor Vas Praes Fidejussor for us the Lord Christ was by his voluntary undertaking out of his rich Grace and Love to do answer and perform all that is required on our Parts that we may enjoy the Benefits of the Covenant the Grace and Glory prepared proposed and promised in it in the way and manner determined on by Divine wisdom And this may be reduced unto two Heads 1. He undertook as the Surety of the Covenant to answer for all the sins of those who are to be and are made Partakers of the Benefits of it That is to undergo the punishment due unto their sins to make Attonement for them by offering himself a propitiatory Sacrifice for their Expiation redeeming them by the price of his Blood from their state of misery and bondage under the Law and the Curse of it Isa. 53 4 5 6 10. Matth. 20. 28. 1 Tim. 2. 6. 1 Cor. 6. 20. Rom. 3. 25 26. Heb. 10. 5 6 7 8. Rom. 8. 2 3. 2 Cor. 5. 19 20 21. Gal. 3. 13. And this was absolutely necessary that the Grace and Glory prepared in the Covenant might be communicated unto us VVithout this undertaking of his and performance of it the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God would not permit that sinners such as
〈◊〉 is that may not be transgressed and so not altered as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Sacred Law which none ought to transgresse which cannot in any thing be dispensed withal And by consequence only it is that which passeth not away That Priesthood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which altereth not which cannot be changed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and he can quicken or enliven or give Eternal Life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for ever respecting duration of time in perpetuum Vul. Lat. Others perfectè perfectly compleatly Ours to the utmost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 accedentes per semetipsum ad Deum Rhemists he is able to save for ever going by himself unto God strangely darkening the sense For going seems to respect his own going to God which the Vulg. accedentes will not bear eos qui per ipsum accedunt ad Deum Those who by him draw nigh to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 semper vivens ad interpellandum pro nobis always living to make intercession for us instead of for them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Causing to ascend or offering prayers for them VER 23 24 25. And they truly were many Priests because they were not suffered to continue by reason of Death But this Man because he continueth ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood Wherefore he is able to save them also to the uttermost that come unto God by him seeing he ever liveth to make Intercession for them THe Apostle in these words proceedeth unto his last Argument from the consideration of the Priesthood of Christ as Typed and represented by that of Melchisedec And his intention is still to prove the excellency of it above the Levitical and of his Person above theirs And in particular he makes it manifest that the bringing in of this better Hope did perfect or consummate all things which the Law could not do That he hath in these verses a respect unto Melchisedec as a Type of Christ and what we are taught thereby is evident from the matter treated of in them He had observed that as to the Description given of him in the Scripture that he abideth a Priest continually ver 3. and that it is witnessed of him that he lives seeing it is no where mentioned that he died ver 8. and this is the last consideration of him which he improveth unto his purpose and it is that which gives vertue and efficacy unto all the other that he had before insisted on Set this aside and all the other whether Advantages or Excellencies which he had discoursed of would be as ineffectual unto the ends aymed at as the Law it self For what profit could it be unto the Church to have so excellent and glorious a Priest for a season and then immediately to be deprived of him by the Expiration of his Office Moreover as what the Apostle affirms here of Christ hath respect unto what he had before observed concerning Melchisedec so what he affirms of the Levitical Priests depends on what he had before declared concerning them namely that they were all mortal dying men and no more and who actually died in their Successive Generations ver 8. The words therefore have three things in them in General 1. The state and Condition of the Levitical Priests by reason of their mortality ver 23. This he observes because he is not declaring the Dignity of Christ and his Priesthood absolutely but with respect unto them whose state therefore was the Antithesis in the Comparison 2. The state and Condition of the Priesthood of Christ on the account of his glorious Immortality ver 24. 3. The blessed effects and consequents of the Priesthood of Christ in as much by vertue of his Immortality he was a Priest for ever v. 25. In the first ver 23. there is 1. The Introduction of his Assertion and Observation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they truly 2. What he affirms of those Priests they were many 3. Whence that came to pass namely because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death which is not alledged only as the cause and Reason of their being many but also as a proof of their weakness and Infirmity In the Introduction of his Assertion there is a note of connexion and another of Asseveration The first is the copulative Conjunction And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Process unto a new Argument to the same purpose with those foregoing is intended hereby The former Design is continued and a new confirmation of it is added For he resolved to omit nothing that was of moment and unto his purpose 2dly There is a vehemency in his Assertion or a note of Asseveration and they truly He had used the same note before in the same manner ver 21. where we omit the Emphasis of it without cause And in other places the same Translators render this Particle by truly as they do here 1 Joh. 1. 3. But he doth not so much assert a thing by it that was dubious as positively declare that which was well known and could no way be gainsaid by them with whom he had to do And an Argument pressed ex concessis is forceible This is a known Truth 2. That which he affirms of them is that they were many Priests or there were many made Priests or they who were made Priests were many The sense is the same By the Appointment of God himself there were many made Priests or executed the office of the Priesthood It is of the High Priests only Aaron and his Successors of whom he speaks And it is with respect unto their Succession one to another that he affirms they were many This both the reason of it which he subjoynes and what he afterwards adds concerning the Priesthood of Christ wherein there was no Succession do evidently declare For there neither was nor could be by the Law any more than one at a time Perhaps in the disorder and confusion of that Church there might be more that were so called and esteemed as were Annas and Caiphas but that confusion he takes no notice of but attends unto what alwayes was or ought to have been according to the Law By Succession these High Priests were many For from Aaron the first of them unto Phineas who was destroyed with the Temple there were inclusively four-score and three High Priests Of these thirteen lived under the Tabernacle before the building of the Temple by Solomon Eighteen under the first Temple unto its Destruction by the Babylonians and all the rest lived under the second Temple which yet stood no longer than the first And the Multiplication of High Priests under the second Temple the Jews look upon as a Punishment and token of Gods displeasure for because of the sins of a Nation their Rulers are many and frequently changed Whatever Advantages there may be in an orderly Succession yet is it absolutely an
Evidence of Imperfection And by the Appointment of this Order God signified an Imperfection and Mutability in that Church state Succession indeed was a Relief against death but it was but a Relief and so supposed a want and weakness Under the Gospel it is not so as we shall see afterwards Observe that God will not fail to provide Instruments for his work that he hath to accomplish If many Priests be needful many the Church shall have 3 The Reason of this Multiplication of Priests was because they were not suffered to continue by reason of Death They were mortal men subject unto death and they died Death suffered them not to continue in the Execution of their Office It forbad them so to do in the name of the great Sovereign Lord of Life and Death And hereof an Instance was given in Aaron the first of them God to shew the nature of this Priesthood unto the people and to manifest that the everlasting Priest was not yet come commanded Aaron to dye in the sight of all the Congregation Num. 20. 25 26 27 28. So did they all afterwards as other men dye in their several Generations They were all by death forbidden to continue Death laid an injunction on them one after another from proceeding any farther in the Administration of their Office It is not surely without some especial design that the Apostle thus expresseth their dying They were by death prohibited to continue Wherefore he shews hereby 1. The way whereby an end was put unto the personal Administration and that was by death 2. That there was an Imperfection in the Administration of that Office which was so frequently interrupted 3. That they were seized upon by death whether they would or no when it may be they would have earnestly desired to continue and the people also would have rejoyced in it Death came on them neither desired nor expected with his Prohibition 4. That when death came and seized on them it kept them under its power so that they could never more attend unto their Office But it was otherwise with the Priest of the better Covenant as we shall see immediately Observe 1. There is such a necessity of the continual Administration of the Sacerdotal Office in behalf of the Church that the interruption of it by the death of the Priests was an Argument of the weakness of that Priesthood The High Priest is the Sponsor and Mediator of the Covenant Those of old were so Typically and by way of Representation VVherefore all Covenant Transactions between God and the Church must be through him He is to offer up all Sacrifices and therein represent all our prayers And it is evident from thence what a Ruin it would be unto the Church to be without an High Priest one moment Who would venture a suprizal unto his own soul in such a condition Could any man enjoy a moments peace if he supposed that in his extremity the High Priest might dye This now is provided against as we shall see in the next verse VER 24. But this man because he continueth ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood IN opposition unto what was observed in the Levitical Priests the contrary is here affirmed of the Lord Christ. And the Design of the Apostle is still the same namely to evince by all sorts of Instances his Preeminence as a Priest above them as such also 1. The Person spoken of is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Exceptive Conjunction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but answereth unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before used and introduceth the other member of the Antithesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hic ille iste He of whom we speak namely Jesus the Surety of the New Testament We render it this man not improperly he was the Mediator between God and man the man Christ Jesus Nor doth the calling of him this man exclude his Divine nature for he was truly a man though God and man in one Person And the things here ascribed unto him were wrought in and by the humane nature though he that wrought them were God also But He or this man who was represented by Melchisedec of whom we speak 2. It is affirmed of this Person that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood the Ground and Reason whereof is assigned namely because he continueth ever which must be first considered The sole Reason here insisted on by the Apostle why the Levitical Priests were many is because they were forbidden by death to continue It is sufficient therefore on the contrary to prove the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Christ that he abideth for ever For he doth not absolutely hereby prove the perpetuity of the Priesthood but his perpetual uninterrupted Administration of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the Faith of the Jews concerning the Messiah and his office We have heard say they out of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 12. 34. That Christ abideth for ever whereon they could not understand what he told them about his being lifted up by Death And so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to abide to continue in any state or condition Joh. 21. 22 23. And this was that which principally he was Typed in by Melchisedec concerning whom there is no Record as to the Beginning of Days or End of Life but as unto the Scripture Description of him he is said to abide a Priest for ever It may be said in opposition hereunto that the Lord Christ dyed also and that no less truely and really than did Aaron or any Priest of his Order Wherefore it will not hence follow that he had any more an uninterrupted Priesthood than they had Some say the Apostle here considers the Priesthood of Christ only after his Resurrection and Ascension into Heaven after which he dyes no more death hath no more power over him And if we will believe the Socinians then he first began to be a Priest This Figment I have fully confuted elsewhere And there is no ground in the Context on which we may conjecture that the Apostle intends the Administration of his Priesthood in Heaven only although he intend that also For he speaks of his Priesthood as typed by that of Melchisedec which as we have proved before respected the whole of his Office I say therefore that although Christ dyed yet he was not forbid by death to abide in his Office as they were He died as a Priest they died from being Priests He died as a Priest because he was also to be a Sacrifice But he abode and continued not only vested with his Office but in the execution of it in the state of death Through the indissolubleness of his Person his soul and body still subsisting in the Person of the Son of God he was a capable subject of his Office And his being in the state of the dead belonged unto the Administration of his Office no less than his Death it self So that from the first
moment of his being a Priest he abode so alwaies without interruption or intermission This is the meaning of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He in his own Person abideth Nor doth the Apostle say that he did not dye but only that he abideth alwaies 3. It followeth from hence that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood A Priesthood subject to no change or alteration that cannot pass away But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sacerdotium successivum per successionem ab uno alteri traditum Such a Priesthood as which when one hath attained it abideth not with him but he delivereth over unto another as Aaron did his unto Eleazar his Son or it falls unto another by some Right or Law of Succession A Priesthood that goes from hand to hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Priesthood that doth not passe from one unto another And this the Apostle seems directly to intend as is evident from the Antithesis The Priests after the Order of Aaron were many and that by reason of death Wherefore it was necessary that their Priesthood should pass from one to another by Succession So that when one received it he that went before him ceased to be a Priest And so it was either the Predecessors were taken off by death or on any other just occasion as it was in the case of Abiathar who was put from the Priests Office by Solomon 1 King 2. 27. How beit our Apostle mentions their going off by death only because that was the ordinary way and which was provided for in the Law With the Lord Christ it was otherwise He received his Priesthood from none Although he had sundry Types yet he had no Predecessor And he hath none to succeed him nor can have any added or joyned unto him in his Office The whole office of the Priesthood of the Covenant and the entire administration of it are confined unto his Person There are no more that follow him than went before him The Expositors of the Roman Church are greatly perplexed in the reconciling of this Passage of the Apostle unto the present Priesthood of their Church And they may well be so seeing they are undoubtedly irreconcileable Some of them say that Peter succeeded unto Christ in his Priesthood as Eleazar did unto Aaron So Ribera some of them deny that he hath any Successor properly so called Successorem non habet nec it a quisquam Catholicus loquitur si bene circumspectè loqui velit saith Estius But it is openly evident that some of them are not so circumspect as Estius would have them but do plainly affirm that Peter was Christs Successor A Lapide indeed affirms that Peter did not succeed unto Christ as Eleazar did unto Aaron because Eleazar had the Priesthood in the same degree and dignity with Aaron and so had not Peter with Christ. But yet that he had the same Priesthood with him a Priesthood of the same kind he doth not deny That which they generally fix upon is that their Priests have not another Priesthood or offer another Sacrifice but are Partakers of his Priesthood and minister under him and so are not his Successors but his Vicars which I think is the worst composure of this difficulty they could have thought upon For 1. This is directly contrary unto the words and design of the Apostle For the Reason he assigns why the Priesthood of Christ doth not passe from him unto any other is because he abides himself for ever to discharge the Office of it Now this excludes all subordination and conjunction all Vicars as well as Successors unless we shall suppose that although he doth thus abide yet is he one way or other disabled to discharge his Office 2. The Successors of Aaron had no more another Priesthood but what he had than it is pretended that the Roman Priests have no other Priesthood but what Christ had Nor did they offer any other Sacrifice than what he offered as these Priests pretend to offer the same Sacrifice that Christ did So that still the case is the same between Aaron and his Successors and Christ and his Substitutes 3. They say that Christ may have Substitutes in his Office though he abide a Priest still and although the office still continue the same unchangeable So God in the Government of the world makes use of Judges and Magistrates yet is himself the Supreme Rector of all But this Pretence is vain also For they do not substitute their Priests unto him in that which he continueth to do himself but in that which he doth not which he did indeed and as a Priest ought to do but now ceaseth to do for ever in his own Person For the principal Act of the Sacerdotal Office of Christ consisted in his Oblation or his offering himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God This he did once and ceaseth for ever from doing so any more But these Priests are assigned to offer him in Sacrifice every day as partakers of the same Priesthood with him which is indeed not to be his Substitutes but his Successors and to take his Office out of his hand as if he were dead and could henceforth discharge it no more For they do not appoint Priests to intercede in his room because they grant he continueth himself so to do but to offer Sacrifice in his stead because he doth so no more Wherefore if that be an Act of Priesthood and of their Priesthood as is pretended it is unavoidable that his Priesthood is passed from him unto them Now this is a blasphemous Imagination and directly contrary both unto the words of the Apostle and the whole Design of his Argument Nay it would lay the advantage on the other side For the Priests of the Order of Aaron had that Priviledge that none could take their Office upon them nor officiate in it whilst they were alive But although Christ abideth for ever yet according unto the sense of these men and their practice thereon he stands in need of others to officiate for him and that in the principal part of his Duty and Office For Offer himself in Sacrifice unto God he neither now doth nor can seeing henceforth he dieth no more This is the work of the Mass-Priests alone who must therefore be honoured as Christs Successors or be abhorred as his Murderers for the Sacrifice of him must be by blood and death The Argument of the Apostle as it is exclusive of this Imagination so it is cogent unto his purpose For so he proceedeth That Priesthood which changeth not but is alwaies vested in the same Person and in him alone is more excellent than that which was subject to change continually from one hand unto another For that Transmission of it from one unto another was an effect of weakness and Imperfection And the Jews grant that the frequency of their change under the second Temple was a Token of Gods displeasure But thus it was with the Priesthood of
Wisdom and Holiness that having designed the bringing of many sons unto Glory he should make the Captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings So the Condecency here intended may respect 1. The Wisdom Grace and Goodness of God It became him to give us such an High Priest as we stood in need of namely one that was able in the Discharge of that Office to save all to the uttermost that come unto God by him For to design our salvation by an High Priest and not to provide such an one as was every way able to effect it became not the Wisdom and Grace of God 2. Respect may be had herein unto our state and condition Such this was as none but such an High Priest could relieve us in or save us from For we stand in need of such an one as our Apostle declares as 1. could make Attonement for our sins or perfectly expiate them 2. Purge our Consciences from dead works that we might serve the living God or sanctifie us throughout by his Blood 3. Procure Acceptance with God for us or purchase eternal Redemption 4. Administer supplies of the spirit of Grace unto us to enable us to live unto God in all Duties of Faith Worship and Obedience 5. Give us assistance and consolation in our Trials Temptations and Sufferings with pity and compassion 6. Preserve us by Power from all ruining Sins and Dangers 7. Be in a continual Readiness to receive us in all our Addresses to him 8. To bestow upon us the Reward of Eternal Life Unless we have an High Priest that can do all these things for us we cannot be saved to the uttermost Such an High Priest we stood in need of and such an one it became the wisdom and Grace of God to give unto us And God in infinite wisdom Love and Grace gave us such an High Priest as in the Qualifications of his Person the Glory of his Condition and the Discharge of his Office was every way suited to deliver us from the state of Apostacy sin and misery and to bring us unto himself through a Perfect salvation This the ensuing particulars will fully manifest The Qualifications of this High Priest are expressed first indefinitely in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Difference from other High Priests is included herein He must not be one of an Ordinary sort but one so singularly qualified unto his work so exalted after his work and so discharging his work unto such Ends. In all these things we stood in need of such an High Priest as was quite of another sort order and kind than any the Church had enjoyed under the Law as the Apostle expresly concludes ver 28. His Personal inherent Qualifications are first expressed and we shall consider first some things in general that are common unto them all and then declare the especial intendment of every one of them in particular Such an High Priest became us as is Holy Harmless Undefiled Separate from sinners And 1. There is some Allusion in all these things unto what was Typically represented in the Institution of the Office of the Priesthood under the Law For the High Priest was to be a Person without blemish not maimed in any part of his body He was not to marry any one that was defiled nor to defile himself among the People On his forehead in his ministrations he ware a Plate of Gold with that Inscription Holiness to the Lord. And no doubt but Personal Holiness was required of him in an especial manner for want whereof God cast out the Posterity of Eli from the Priesthood But all those things were only outward Representations of what was really required unto such an High Priest as the Church stood in need of For they were mostly external giving a Denomination unto the Subject but working no real change in it And where they were internal they were encompassed with such a mixture of sins weaknesses infirmities and the Intercision of Death as that they had no Glory in comparison of what was required All these things the Apostle observes reducing them unto two Heads namely that they were obnoxious unto Sin and Death and therefore as they died so they offered sacrifices for their own sins But the Church was taught by them from the Beginning that it stood in need of an High Priest whose real Qualifications should answer all these Types and Representations of them 2. It is possible that our Apostle in this Description of our High Priest designed to obviate the prejudicate opinion of some of the Hebrews concerning their Messiah For generally they looked on him as one that was to be a great earthly Prince and warriour that should conquer many Nations and subdue all their enemies with the sword shedding the blood of men in Abundance In opposition unto this vain and pernicious Imagination our Saviour testifies unto them that he came not to kill but to save and keep alive And our Apostle here gives such a Description of him in these holy gracious Qualifications as might attest his Person and work to be quite of another nature than what they desired and expected And their frustration herein was the principal occasion of their unbelief See Mal. 3. 1 2 3. 3. I am sorry that it hath fallen from the Pen of an able Expositor of our own on this place that the Time when the Lord Christ was thus made an High Priest for ever and that by an Oath was after he had offered one sacrifice not many for the People not for himself once not often of everlasting vertue and not effectual for some petty Expiations for a time and after he was risen ascended and set at the right hand of God If by being made an High Priest only a Solemn Declaration of being made so is intended these things may passe well enough For we allow that in the Scripture then a thing is oft-times said to be when it is first manifested or declared So was the Lord Christ determined to be the son of God with Power by the Resurrection from the dead But if it be intended as the words will scarce admit of any other Interpretation that then the Lord Christ was first made an High Priest after all this was performed the whole real Priesthood of Christ and his proper Sacrifice is overthrown For it is said he was not made an High Priest until after that he had offered his one sacrifice And if it were so then he was not a Priest when he so offered himself But this implies a contradiction for there can be no sacrifice where there is no Priest And therefore the Socinians who make the consecration of the Lord Christ unto his Sacerdotal Office to be by his entrance into Heaven do utterly deny his Death to have been a Sacrifice but only a Preparation for it as they fancy the killing of the beast to have been of old And the Truth is either the Lord Christ was a Priest before and in the
respect unto the life and manners of Christ yet it was no way unto the purpose of the Apostle to mention them unto the end designed But 1 If that be the sense of the words which he contends for not one of them is true with respect unto the life and manners of Christ in this world for they all belong unto his blessed estate in the other 2 We shall see on the next verse how far he will allow them to be true of the life and manners of Christ in any sense seeing in some sense he affirms him to have offered sacrifice for his own sins And this he doth with an expresse contradiction unto his own main Hypothesis For by sins he understands weakness and infirmities and whereas he will not allow Christ to have offered himself before his entrance into the Holy place and makes it necessary that he should be antecedently freed from all weaknesses and Infirmities it is the highest contradiction to affirm that he offered for them seeing he could not offer himself until he was delivered from them 2. We have only his bare word for it that the Asscription of those things unto our High Priest as inherent Qualifications was not unto the purpose of the Apostle And his Assertion is built on a false supposition namely that the Lord Christ was not an High Priest on the Earth nor did offer himself unto God in his Death which overthrows the Foundation of the Gospel 6. The Vanity and Falshood of this novel Exposition will yet farther and fully be evinced in an enquiry into the proper signification of these words as here used by the Apostle every one whereof is wrested to give countenance unto it 1. He is or was to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sanctus Holy that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For Acts 2. 22. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thy Holy one from Psal. 16. 10. And the Lord Christ is there said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 antecedently unto his Resurrection which must be with respect unto his internal Holiness Thou shalt not suffer thine Holy One to see Corrupton And in the New Testament the word is every where used for him that is internally holy 1 Tim. 2. 8. Tit. 1. 8. The Syriack renders it in this place by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pure which is an inherent Qualification as it doth 1 Tim. 2. 8. and Tit. 1. 8. by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Pious Holy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Hesychius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Pure Righteous Godly Peaceable Chast. So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used only for Holily 1 Thes. 2. 10. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is internal Holiness Luk. 1. 75. Ephes. 4. 24. No where is it used for a merciful disposition much less for venerable and sacred upon the Account of an immortal nature or any other Priviledge as it is pretended Neither is the word used in any other Good Author to signifie any one but him that is Holy and Righteous or free from all sin and wickedness It is therefore the holy purity of the nature of Christ that is intended in this expression His Life and Actions are expressed in the ensuing Epithets His nature was pure and holy absolutly free from any spot or taint of our original Defilement Hence as he was conceived in the Womb and as he came from the Womb he was that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 holy thing of God Luke 1. 35. All others since the fall have a polluted nature and are originally unholy But his conception being miraculous by the immediate operation of the Holy Ghost and his nature not derived unto him by natural Generation the only means of the Propagation of original Defilement and in the first instant of its being filled with all habitual seeds of Grace He was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Holy And such an High Priest became us as was so Had he had a nature touched with sin he had not been meet either to be a Priest or Sacrifice This Holiness of nature was needful unto him who was to answer for the unholiness of our nature and to take it away Unholy Sinners do stand in need of an Holy Priest and an Holy Sacrifice What we have not in our selves we must have in him or we shall not be accepted with the Holy God who is of purer eyes than to behold Iniquity 2. He was to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is saith Schlictingius omnis mali expers nullis amplius miseriis obnoxius incapable of suffering any hurt saith another to the same Purpose The word is but once more used in the New Testament and that in a sense remote enough from one not exposed to misery or incapable of suffering Rom. 16. 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Men Simple and Harmless who for the most part are exposed to most Evils and Troubles in the World 2. It is never used in any good Author in such a sense nor can any instance be produced unto that purpose But it constantly signifies one Innocent Harmless free from malice who doth no evil Nor did any one before these Interpreters dream of a passive Interpretation of this Word It is he who doth no evil not he who can suffer no evil 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is malus or qui dolo malo utitur an Evil malitious Person 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is vitiositas in the Judgement of Cicero Virtutis saith he contraria est vitiositas sic enim malo quam malitiam appellare quam Graeci 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 appellant nam Malitia certi cujusdam vitii nomen est vitiosit as omnium We render it sometimes naughtiness Jam. 1. 22. sometimes malice or malitiousness 1 Pet. 1. 16. All manner of evil with deceitful guile Wherefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is he that is free from all evil fraud or sin the same absolutely with that of the Apostle Peter 1 Epist. 2. 22. Who did no sin neither was there guile found in his mouth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Holy is his Epithet with respect unto his Nature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Harmless respects his Life The first includes all positive Holiness the other an Abnegation of all unholiness As he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he had not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sin present as we have with us Rom. 7. 18 21. or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sin easily besetting Heb. 12. 1. As he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he was free from every effect of such a Principle And we had need of such an High Priest Had he not been innocent and every way blameless himself he would have had other work to do than always to take care of our Salvation as the Apostle observes in the next verse He must first have offered for his own sins as the High Priest did of old before he had offered for us or ours And this added unto the merit of his Obedience For whereas he was absolutely Innocent Harmlesse and free
the plural number and that was but one yet because of the Repetition of it it being offered year by year continually as he speaks Chap. 10. 1. it may be signifyed hereby And those sacrifices were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And in answer unto them our Lord Jesus Christ offered himself a sacrifice for sin And this is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for sin only without the mention of sacrifice Rom. 8. 3 For because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies both the sin and the sacrifice for it as the Verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies in one conjugation to sin and in another to expiate sin the sacrifices it self is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For sin 6. The order of these sacrifices is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 first and then First for his own sins and then for those of the People Either the whole Discharge of the office of the High Priests may be intended in this order or that which was peculiar unto the Feast of Expiation For he was in general to take care in the first place about offering for his own sins according to the Law Levit. 4 For if that were not done in due order if their own legal Guilt were not expiated in its proper season according to the Law they were no way meet to offer for the sins of the Congregation yea they exposed themselves unto the penalty of Excision And this order was necessary seeing the Law appointed men to be Priests who had infirmities of their own as is expressed in the next verse Or the order intended may respect in an especial manner the form and process prescribed in the solemn Anniversary sacrifice at the least of Expiation Levit. 16. First he was to offer a Sin-offering for himself and his house and then for the People both on the same day 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for his own sins And this upon a double Account First because he was really a sinner as the rest of the People were If he do sin according to the sin of the People Levit. 4. 3. Secondly That upon the expiation of his own sins in the first place he might be the more meet to represent him who had no sin And therefore he was not to offer for himself in the offering that he made for the People but stood therein as a sinless Person as our High Priest was really to be 2. For the sins of the People 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is for the whole congregation of Israel according to the Law Levit. 16. 21. This was the Duty the order and method of the High Priests of old in their offerings and sacred services This their weaknesses Infirmities and Sins as also the Sacrifices which they offered did require All that could be learned from it was that some more excellent Priest and Sacrifice was to be introduced For no Perfection no Consummation in divine Favour no settled Peace of Conscience could in this way be obtained all things openly declared that so they could not be And hence have we an Evidence of what is affirmed Joh. 1. 17. The Law was given by Moses but Grace and Truth came by Jesus Christ. And the Priviledge or Advancement of the Church in its Deliverance from those various multiplyed obscure means of Instruction into the glorious light of the way and causes of our Adoption Justification and Salvation is inexpressibly great and full of Grace No longer are we now obliged unto a rigid observance of those things which did not effect what they did represent An encrease in thankfulness fruitfulness and holiness cannot but be expected from us These are the things that are here denied of our High Priest He had no need to offer Sacrifice in this way order and method The offering of Sacrifice is not denied that is Sacrifice for the sins of the People yea it is positively asserted in the next words but that he offered dayly many sacrifices or any for himself or had need so to do this is denied by the Apostle That alone which he did is asserted in the remaining words of the verse For this he did once when he offered himself And two things are in the words 1 What he did in general 2 In particular how he did it For the first it is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This he did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 refers only unto one clause of the Antecedent namely offering for the sins of the People This he did once when he offered himself for himself he did not offer But contrary unto the sense of the whole Church of God contrary to the Analogie of Faith and with no small Danger in the expression Socinus first affirmed that the Lord Christ offered also for himself or his own sins And he is followed herein by those of his own Sect as Schlinctingius on this Place and so he is also by Grotius and Hammond which is the Chanel whereby many of his Notions and Conceptions are derived unto us It is true that both he and they do acknowledge that the Lord Christ had no sins of his own properly so called that is Transgressions of the Law but his Infirmities say some of them whereby he was exposed unto Death his sufferings say others are called his sins But nothing can be more abhorrent from Truth and Piety than this Assertion For 1. If this be so then the Apostle expresly in terms affirms that Christ offered for his own sins and that distinctly from the sins of the People And from this Blasphemy we are left to relieve our selves by an Interpretation that the Scripture no where gives countenance unto namely that by sins infirmities or miseries are intended It is true that Infirmity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth sometimes signify sin or obnoxiousness unto sin but sin doth no where signify natural infirmities but moral evils always It is true Christ was made sin but where it is said so it is also added that it was for us and to take off all Apprehensions of any thing in him that might be so called that he knew no sin He was made sin for us when he offered for the sins of the People And other distinct offering for himself he offered none And therefore in sundry places where mention is made of his offering himself it is still observed that he did no sin but was as a Lamb without spot and without blemish Let therefore men put what Interpretation they please on their own words for they are not the words of the Apostle that Christ offered himself for his own sins the language is and must be offensive unto every Holy Heart and hath an open appearance of express contradiction unto many other Testimonies of the Scripture 2 The sole Reason pretended to give countenance unto this absurd Assertion is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This must answer to the whole preceding proposition which is its Antecedent Now therein is mention of the
unto God when he offered himself not to expiate his own infirmities by his offering but that he might be carried through and supported in his Oblation which he offered for the sins of the People and had success therein See the exposition on chap. 5. 7. 5. He is more kind than ordinary in extending the Oblation of Christ unto his death also But he recalls his grant affirming that he did only prepare himself for his offering thereby And this also casts his whole Exposition into much confusion Christ offered himself once saith the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 once and at one time This I suppose is agreed Then he offered for himself and his own sins or not at all For he offered but once and at one time Where then did he thus offer himself and when In Heaven upon his Ascension say the Socinians with one accord Where then and when did he offer for himself On the earth Then he offered himself twice No by no means he offered not himself on the Earth how then did he offer for himself on the earth He did not indeed offer himself on the Earth but he prepared himself for his offering on the Earth and therein he offered for himself that is he did and he did not offer himself upon the earth For they cannot evade by saying that he did it when he offered up prayers on the Earth For the Apostle says expresly in this place that what he did he did it when he offered himself And it must be by such an offering as answered the offering of the high Priest for himself which was bloody 6. The close of his Discourse whereby he would prove the Truth of his Exposition of the verse foregoing from his Interpretation of this is absurd as that which would give countenance unto an evident falsehood from what is more evidently so Grotius adds little unto what Schlictingius offers in this case Only he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken for those griefs which are commonly the punishment of sin Rom. 6. 10. But it is a mistake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place signifies nothing but the Guilt of Sin which Christ died to expiate and take away He died once for sin that is he suffered once for sin He says moreover that profluvium mulierum is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Levit. 12. 8. 15. 13. as also is the leprosie chap. 14. 13. But herein also he is mistaken both the one and the other subject unto those defiling Distempers were appointed to offer a sin-offering for those sins which those Defilements were tokens of and the sin of Nature which they proceed from Again he says that Christ in his offering was freed from those infirmities and miseries per mortem acceleratam But his death was not hasted one moment until all was finished nor did he offer for the hastening of his Death And his ensuing words are most ambiguous Christ offered pro doloribus istis qui solent peccatorum poenae esse quos Christus occasione etiam peccatorum humani generis toleravit If the sorrows intended were not true punishments of sin they could not be offered for And what sorrows Christ underwent so far as they were penal he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People and not otherwise But those which are called his own sins must be every way distinct from the sins of the People and have no Relation unto them as the sins of the High Priests of old had not Wherefore if by the occasion of the sins of men he intend that his Sufferings and Griefs were for the sins of men then he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People when he bare our sins and sorrows and had no need to offer distinctly for them as his own And if it were a sorrow that was not for sin it cannot be called Sin Christs sufferings on the occasion of the sins of mankind is well understood by those who are any way skilled in the Socinian Mysteries Hammond says the same He both saith he offered for himself that is made expiation as it were not to deliver himself from sin for he was never guilty of any but from the infirmities assumed by him but especially from death it self and so is now never likely to dye and to determine his Melchisedecian Priesthood Ans. 1 To make expiation as it were from the infirmities assumed by him or to be delivered from them is hard to be understood 2 Much more is it how by death wherein he offered himself he should make expiation to be delivered from death it self 3 And it is as hard to say that Christ offered for himself once by death that he might dye no more seeing it is appointed unto all men only once to dye I have digressed thus far to crush this novel Invention which as it is untrue and alien from the sense of the Apostle so it hath in the expression of it an ungrateful sound of Impiety But I expect not so much Sobriety as that considering the means of its conveyance unto the minds of men at present it should not be vented again until what hath been here pleaded in its confutation be answered At present I shall proceed with the Exposition of the remainder of the words How and what Christ offered for the sins of the People is declared in the words remaining 1. For the way or manner of it He did it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Once only This is directly opposed unto the frequency of the legal Sacrifices repeated daily as there was occasion Those High Priests offered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 daily on all occasions He 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Once only And I cannot but observe by the way that this Assertion of the Apostle is no less absolutely exclusive of the Missatical Sacrifices of the Priests of the Roman Church than it is of the Levitical Sacrifices of the High Priest of the Church of the Jews Their Expositors on this place do generally affirm in plea for their Church that they offer it not to make expiation of sins but only to represent and make application of the one Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross. But in their Mass it self they speak otherwise and expresly offer it to God a Sacrifice for the sins of the living and the dead Neither yet do we enquire unto what End they do what they do and this is all they say that they offer the same sacrifice that Christ did that is himself And this they do a thousand times more frequently than the Expiatory Sacrifices were among the Jews Neither were their Sacrifices offered properly by Gods Appointment to make Attonement for Sin by their own vertue and Efficacy but only to be a Representation and Application of the Sacrifice of Christ to come Whatever ends they therefore fancy unto themselves by pretending to offer the same sacrifice that Christ did they contradict the words of the Apostle and wholly
unto Grace and Glory we may see the pattern and example of our own For if it was not upon the consideration or foresight of the obedience of the Humane Nature of Christ that he was predestinated and chosen unto the grace of the Hypostatical Union with the Ministry and Glory which depended thereon but of the meer Sovereign Grace of God how much less could a foresight of any thing in us be the cause why God should chuse us in him before the foundation of the world unto grace and glory 4. The Quality of this Ministry thus obtained as unto a comparative excellency is also expressed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more excellent The word is used only in this Epistle in this sense Chap. 1. 4. and in this place The original word denotes only a difference from other things but in the comparative degree as here used it signifies a Difference with a Preference or a comparative excellency The Ministry of the Levitical Priests was good and useful in its time and season This of our Lord Jesus Christ so differed from it as to be better than it and more excellent 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And 5. There is added hereunto the Degree of this Preheminence so far as it is intended in this place and the present Argument in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by how much So much more excellent by how much The excellency of his Ministry above that of the Levitical Priests bears proportion with the excellency of the Covenant whereof he was the Mediator above the Old Covenant wherein they administred whereof afterwards So have we explained the Apostles Assertion concerning the excellency of the Ministry of Christ. And herewith he closeth his Discourse which he had so long engaged in about the Preheminence of Christ in his Office above the High Priests of old And indeed this being the very hinge whereon his whole Controversie with the Jews did depend he could not give it too much evidence nor too full a confirmation And as unto what concerns our selves at present we are taught thereby That Ob. It is our Duty and our Safety to acquiesce universally and obsolutely in the Ministry of Jesus Christ. That which he was so designed unto in the infinite wisdom and grace of God that which he was so furnished for the discharge of by the communication of the Spirit unto him in all fulness that which all other Priesthoods were removed to make way for must needs be sufficient and effectual for all the ends unto which it is designed It may be said this is that which all men do all that are called Christians do fully acquiesce in the Ministry of Jesus Christ. But if it be so why do we hear the bleating of another sort of Cattel What mean those other Priests and reiterated Sacrifices which make up the Worship of the Church of Rome If they rest in the Ministry of Christ why do they appoint one of their own to do the same things that he hath done namely to offer Sacrifice unto God The Proof of this Assertion lies in the latter part of these words By how much he was the Mediator of a better Covenant established on better Promises The words are so disposed that some think the Apostle intends not to prove the excellency of the Covenant from the excellency of his Ministry therein But the other sense is more suited unto the scope of the place and the nature of the Argument which the Apostle presseth the Hebrews withal For on supposition that there was indeed another and that a better Covenant to be introduced and established than that which the Levitical Priests served in which they could not deny it plainly follows that he on whose Ministry the dispensation of that Covenant did depend must of necessity be more excellent in that Ministry than they who appertained unto that Covenant which was to be abolished However it may be granted that these things do mutually testifie unto and illustrate one another Such as the Priest is such is the Covenant such as the Covenant is in dignity such is the Priest also In the words there are three things observable 1. What is in general ascribed unto Christ declaring the nature of his Ministry He was a Mediator 2. The Determination of his Mediatory Office unto the New Covenant Of a better Covenant 3. The Proof or Demonstration of the nature of his Covenant as unto its excellency It was established on better Promises 1. His Office is that of a Mediator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that interposed between God and man for the doing of all those things whereby a Covenant might be established between them and made effectual Schlictingius on the place gives this description of a Mediator Mediatorem faederis esse nihil aliud est quam Dei esse interpretem internuntium in faedere cum hominibus pangendo per quem scilicet Deus voluntatem suam hominibus declaret illi vicissim divinae voluntatis notitid instructi ad Deum accedant cumque eo reconciliati pacem in posterum colant And Grotius speaks much unto the same purpose But this Description of a Mediator is wholly applicable unto Moses and suited unto his Office in giving of the Law see Exod. 20. 19. Deut. 15. 27 28. What is said by them doth indeed immediately belong unto the Mediatory Office of Christ but it is not confined thereunto yea it is exclusive of the principal parts of his Mediation And whereas there is nothing in it but what belongs unto the Prophetical Office of Christ which the Apostle here doth not principally intend it is most improperly applied as a Description of such a Mediator as he doth intend And therefore when he comes afterwards to declare in particular what belonged unto such a Mediator of the Covenant as he designed he expresly placeth it in his Death for the redemption of transgressions Chap. 9. 15. affirming that for that cause he was a Mediator But hereof there is nothing at all in the Description they give us of this Office But this the Apostle doth in his elsewhere 1 Tim. 2. 5 6. There is one God and one Mediator between God and man the Man Christ Jesus who gave himself a ransom for all The principal part of his Mediation consisted in the giving himself a ransom or a price of redemption for the whole Church Wherefore this Description of a Mediator of the New Testament is feigned only to exclude his satisfaction or his offering himself unto God in his death and blood-shedding with the atonement made thereby The Lord Christ then in his Ministry is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Mediator of the Covenant in the same sense as he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Surety whereof see the Exposition on Chap. 7. 22. He is in the New Covenant the Mediator the Surety the Priest the Sacrifice all in his own Person The ignorance and want of a due consideration hereof
blood of the only Sacrifice which belonged unto it Before this was done in the death of Christ it had not the formal nature of a Covenant or a Testament as our Apostle proves Chap. 9. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. For neither as he shews in that place would the Law given at Sinai have been a Covenant had it not been confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices Wherefore the Promise was not before a formal and solemn Covenant 2 This was wanting that it was not the Spring Rule and Measure of all the Worship of the Church This doth belong unto every Covenant properly so called that God makes with the Church that it be the entire Rule of all the Worship that God requires of it which is that which they are to restipulate in their entrance into Covenant with God But so the Covenant of Grace was not under the Old Testament For God did require of the Church many Duties of Worship that did not belong thereunto But now under the New Testament this Covenant with its own seals and appointments is the only Rule and Measure of all acceptable Worship Wherefore the New Covenant promised in the Scripture and here opposed unto the Old is not the Promise of Grace Mercy Life and Salvation by Christ absolutely considered but as it had the formal nature of a Covenant given unto it in its establishment by the death of Christ the procuring cause of all its Benefits and the declaring of it to be the only Rule of Worship and Obedience unto the Church So that although by the Covenant of Grace we oft-times understand no more but the way of Life Grace Mercy and Salvation by Christ yet by the New Covenant we intend its actual establishment in the death of Christ with that blessed way of Worship which by it is setled in the Church 3 Whil'st the Church enjoyed all the spiritual Benefits of the Promise wherein the substance of the Covenant of Grace was contained before it was confirmed and made the sole Rule of Worship unto the Church it was not inconsistent with the Holiness and Wisdom of God to bring it under any other Covenant or prescribe unto it what Forms of Worship he pleased It was not so I say upon these three Suppositions 1 That this Covenant did not disannul or make ineffectual the Promise that was given before but that That doth still continue the only means of Life and Salvation And that this was so our Apostle proves at large Gal. 3. 17 18 19. 2 That this other Covenant with all the Worship contained in it or required by it did not divert from but direct and lead unto the future establishment of the Promise in the Sclemnity of a Covenant by the ways mentioned And that the Covenant made in Sinai with all its Ordinances did so the Apostle proves likewise in the place beforementioned as also in this whole Epistle 3 That it be of present use and advantage unto the Church in its present condition This the Apostle acknowledgeth to be a great Objection against the use and efficacy of the Promise under the Old Testament as unto Life and Salvation namely to what end then serves the giving of the Law whereunto he answers by shewing the necessity and use of the Law unto the Church in its then present condition Gal. 3. 17. 4. These things being observed we may consider that the Scripture doth plainly and expresly make mention of two Testaments or Covenants and distinguish between them in such a way as what is spoken can hardly be accommodated unto a twofold Administration of the same Covenant The one is mentioned and described Exod. 24. ver 3 4 5 6 7 8. Deut. 5. 2 3 4 5. namely the Covenant that God made with the people of Israel in Sinai and which is commonly called the Covenant where the people under the Old Testament are said to keep or break Gods Covenant which for the most part is spoken with respect unto that Worship which was peculiar thereunto The other is promised Jer. 31. 31 32 33 34. Chap. 32. 40. which is the New Gospel Covenant as before explained mentioned Mat. 26. 28. Mark 14. 24. And these two Covenants or Testaments are compared one with the other and opposed one unto another 2 Cor. 3. 6 7 8 9. Gal. 4. 24 25 26. Heb. 7. 22. Chap. 9. 15 16 17 18 19. These two we call the Old and the New Testament Only it must be observed that in this Argument by the Old Testament we do not understand the Books of the Old Testament or the Writings of Moses the Psalms and Prophets or the Oracles of God committed then unto the Church I confess they are once so called 2 Cor. 3. 14. The vail remaineth untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament that is the Books of it Unless we shall say that the Apostle intendeth only the reading of the things which concern the Old Testament in the Scripture For this Old Covenant or Testament whatever it be is abrogated and taken away as the Apostle expresly proves But the Word of God in the Books of the Old Testament abideth for ever And those Writings are called the Old Testament or the Books of the Old Testament not as though they contained in them nothing but what belongeth unto the Old Covenant for they contain the Doctrine of the New Testament also But they are so termed because they were committed unto the Church whil'st the Old Covenant was in force as the Rule and Law of its Worship and Obedience 5. Wherefore we must grant two distinct Covenants rather than a twofold Administration of the same Covenant meerly to be intended We must I say do so provided always that the way of Reconciliation and Salvation was the same under both But it will be said and with great pretence of Reason for it is that which is the sole foundation they all build upon who allow only a twofold Administration of the same Covenant that this being the principal end of a Divine Covenant if the way of Reconciliation and Salvation be the same under both then indeed are they for the substance of them but one And I grant thut this would inevitably follow if it were so equally by virtue of them both If Reconciliation and Salvation by Christ were to be obtained not only under the Old Covenant but by vertue thereof then it must be the same for substance with the New But this is not so for no Reconciliation with God nor Salvation could be obtained by vertue of the Old Covenant or the Administration of it as our Apostle disputes at large though all Believers were reconciled justified and saved by vertue of the Promise whil'st they were under that Covenant As therefore I have shewed in what sense the Covenant of Grace is called the New Covenant in this distinction and opposition so I shall propose sundry things which relate unto the nature of the first Covenant which manifest it
of the Testator and as it was accompanied with the blood of a Sacrifice whereof we must treat afterwards at large if God will 2 It is such a Covenant as wherein the Covenanter he that makes it bequeatheth his Goods unto others in the way of a Legacy For this is done by Christ herein as we must also declare afterwards Wherefore our Saviour calls this Covenant the New Testament in his Blood This the word used by the Apostle doth properly signifie and it is evident that he intends not a Covenant absolutely and strictly so taken With respect hereunto the first Covenant is usually called the Old Testament For we intend not thereby the Books of Scripture or Oracles of God committed unto the Church of the Jews which yet as we have observed are once called the Old Testament 2 Cor. 3. 14. but the Covenant that God made with the Church of Israel at Sinai whereof we have spoken at large And this was called a Testament for three Reasons 1. Because it was confirmed by death that is the death of the Sacrifices that were slain and offered at its solemn establishment So faith our Apostle The first Testament was not dedicated without blood Chap. 9. 15. But there is more required hereunto for even a Covenant properly and strictly so called may be confirmed with Sacrifices Wherefore 2. God did therein make over and grant unto the Church of Israel the good things of the Land of Canaan with the Priviledges of his Worship 3. The principal Reason of this denomination the Old Testament is taken from its being typically significative of the Death and Legacy of the great Testator as we have shewed We have treated somewhat before concerning the Nature of the New Testament as considered in distinction from and opposition unto the Old I shall here only briefly consider what concurreth unto the constitution of it as it was then future when this Promise was given and as it is here promised And three things do concur hereunto 1. A Recapitulation Collection and Confirmation of all the Promises of Grace that had been given unto the Church from the beginning even all that was spoken by the mouth of the holy Prophets that had been since the world began Luke 1. 70. The first Promise contained in it the whole essence and substance of the Covenant of Grace All those afterwards given unto the Church on various occasions were but explications and confirmations of it In the whole of them there was a full declaration of the wisdom and love of God in sending his Son and of his grace unto Mankind thereby And God solemnly confirmed them with his Oath namely that they should be all accomplished in their appointed season Whereas therefore the Covenant here promised included the sending of Christ for the accomplishment of those Promises they are all gathered into one head therein It is a constellation of all Promises of Grace 2. All these Promises were to be reduced into an actual Covenant or Testament two ways 1. In that as unto the accomplishment of the grace principally intended in them they received it in the sending of Christ and as to the confirmation and establishment of them for the communication of grace unto the Church they received it in the death of Christ as a Sacrifice of Agreement or Attonement 2. They are established as the Rule and Law of Reconciliation and Peace between God and man This gives them the nature of a Covenant For a Covenant is the solemn expression of the terms of Peace between various Parties with the confirmation of them 3. They are reduced into such form of Law as to become the only Rule of the Ordinances of Worship and Divine Service required of the Church Nothing unto these ends is now presented unto us or required of us but what belongeth immediately unto the administration of this Covenant and the grace thereof But the Reader must consult what hath been discoursed at large unto this purpose on the 6th verse And we may see from hence what it is that God here promiseth and foretelleth as that which he would do in the days that were coming For whereas they had the Promise before and so virtually the grace and mercy of the New Covenant it may be enquired what is yet wanting that should be promised solemnly under the name of a Covenant For the full resolution of this question I must as before refer the Reader unto what hath been discoursed at large about the two Covenants and the difference between them on ver 6. Here we may briefly name some few things sufficient unto the exposition of this place As 1. All those Promises which had before been given out unto the Church from the beginning of the world were now reduced into the form of a Covenant or rather of a Testament The name of a Covenant is indeed sometimes applied unto the Promises of Grace before or under the Old Testament But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word used in all those places denoteth only a free gratuitous Promise Gen. 9. 9. Chap. 17. 4. But they were none of them nor all of them together reduced into the form of a Testament which they could not be but by the death of the Testator And what blessed Priviledges and Benefits were included herein hath been shewed before and must yet further be insisted on in the Exposition of the 9th Chapter if God permit 2. There was another Covenant superadded unto the Promises which was to be the immediate Rule of the Obedience and Worship of the Church And according unto their observance of this superadded Covenant they were esteemed to have kept or broken Covenant with God This was the Old Covenant in Sinai as hath been declared Wherefore the Promises could not be in the form of a Covenant unto the People inasmuch as they could not be under the power of two Covenants at once and those as it afterwards appeared absolutely inconsistent For this is that which our Apostle proves in this place namely That where the Promises were brought into the form and had the use of a Covenant unto the Church the former Covenant must needs disappear or be disannulled Only they had their place and efficacy to convey the benefits of the grace of God in Christ unto them that did believe but God here foretelleth that he will give them such an order and efficacy in the administration of his grace as that all the fruits of it by Jesus Christ shall be bequeathed and made over unto the Church in the way of a Solemn Covenant 3. Notwithstanding the Promises which they had received yet the whole System of their Worship sprang from and related unto the Covenant made at Sinai But now God promiseth a new state of spiritual Worship relating only unto the Promises of grace as brought into the form of a Covenant The New Covenant as recollecting into one all the Promises of Grace given from the foundation of the World accomplished in the actual
the Old Testament or dispensation of the Old Covenant Such a time there was appointed unto it in the counsel of God during this season things fell out as described ver 9. The certain period fixed unto these days is called by our Apostle the time of Reformation Chap. 9. 10. After those days that is in or at their expiration when they were coming unto their end whereby the first Covenant waxed old and decayed God would make this Covenant with them And although much was done towards it before those days came absolutely unto an end and did actually expire yet is the making of it said to be after those days because being made in the wane and declension of them it did by its making put a full and final end unto them This in general was the time here designed for the making and establishing of the New Covenant But we must yet farther enquire into the precise time of the accomplishment of this Promise And I say the whole of it cannot be limited unto any one season absolutely as though all that was intended in Gods making of this Covenant did consist in any one individual act The making of the Old Covenant with the Fathers is said to be in the day wherein God took them by the hand to bring them out of the Land of Egypt During the season intended there were many things that were preparatory to the making of that Covenant or to the solemn establishment of it So was it also in the making of the New Covenant It was gradually made and established and that by sundry Acts preparatory for it or confirmatory of it And there are six degrees observable in it 1. The first peculiar entrance into it was made by the Ministry of John the Baptist. Him had God raised to send under the name in the spirit and power of Elijah to prepare the way of the Lord Mal. 4. Hence is his Ministry called the beginning of the Gospel Mark 1. 1 2. Until his coming the People were bound absolutely and universally unto the Covenant in Horeb without alteration or addition in any Ordinance of Worship But his Ministry was designed to prepare them and to cause them to look out after the accomplishment of this promise of making the New Covenant Mal. 4. 4 5 6. And those by whom his Ministry was despised did reject the counsel of God against themselves that is unto their ruine and made themselves liable to that utter excision with the Threatnings whereof the Writings of the Old Testament are closed Mal. 4. 6. He therefore called the People off from resting in or trusting unto the Priviledges of the first Covenant Mat. 3. 8 9 10. preached unto them a Doctrine of Repentance and instituted a new Ordinance of Worship whereby they might be initiated into a new state or condition a new Relation unto God And in his whole Ministry he pointed at directed and gave Testimony unto him who was then to come to establish this New Covenant This was the beginning of the accomplishment of this Promise 2. The coming in the Flesh and personal Ministry of our Lord Jesus Christ himself was an eminent advance and degree therein The dispensation of the Old Covenant did yet continue For he himself as made of a Woman was made under the Law yielding Obedience unto it observing all its Precepts and Institutions But his coming in the Flesh laid an Axe unto the Root of that whole dispensation For therein the main end that God designed thereby towards that People was accomplished The interposition of the Law was now to be taken away and the Promise to become all unto the Church Hence upon his Nativity this Covenant was proclaimed from Heaven as that which was immediately to take place Luk. 2. 13 14. But it was more fully and evidently carried on in and by his personal Ministry The whole doctrine thereof was preparatory unto the immediate introduction of this Covenant But especially there was therein and thereby by the truth which he taught by the manner of his teaching by the miracles which he wrought in conjunction with an open accomplishment of the Prophesies concerning him evidence given that he was the Messiah the Mediator of the New Covenant Herein was a declaration made of the Person in and by whom it was to be established and therefore he told them That unless they believed it was he who was so promised they should dye in iheir sins 3. The way for the introduction of this Covenant being thus prepared it was solemnly enacted and confirmed in and by his death For herein he offered that Sacrifice to God whereby it was established And hereby the Promise properly became 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Testament as our Apostle proves at large Chap. 9. 14 15 16. And he declares in the same place that it answered those Sacrifices whose blood was sprinkled on the People and the Book of the Law in the confirmation of the first Covenant which things must be treated of afterwards This was the Center wherein all the Promises of Grace did meet and from whence they derived their efficacy From henceforward the Old Covenant and all its administrations having received their full accomplishment did abide only in the patience of God to be taken down and removed out of the way in his own time and manner For really and in themselves their force and authority did then cease and was taken away See Eph. 2. 14 15 16. Col. 2. 14 15. But our obligation unto Obedience and the observance of Commands though formally and ultimately it be resolved into the Will of God yet immediately it respects the Revelation of it by which we are directly obliged Wherefore although the causes of the removal of the Old Covenant had already been applied thereunto yet the Law and its Institutions were still continued not only lawful but useful unto the Worshippers until the Will of God concerning their abrogation was fully declared 4. This New Covenant had the complement of its making and establishment in the Resurrection of Christ. For in order hereunto the Old was to have its perfect end God did not make the first Covenant and therein revive represent and confirm the Covenant of Works with the Promise annexed unto it meerly that it should continue for such a season and then die of its self and be arbitrarily removed But that whole dispensation had an end which was to be accomplished and without which it was not consistent with the wisdom or righteousness of God to remove it or take it away Yea nothing of it could be removed until all was fulfilled It was easier to remove Heaven and Earth than to remove the Law as unto its Right and Title to rule the Souls and Consciences of men before all was fulfilled And this end had two parts 1 The perfect fulfilling of the Righteousness which it required This was done in the Obedience of Christ the Surety of the New Covenant in the stead of them with whom
of his power But that our wills are left absolutely herein unto their own liberty and power without being inclined and determined by that grace of God is that Pelagianism which hath long attempted the Church but which shall never absolutely prevail 5. The putting the Laws of God in our minds and the writing of them in our hearts that we may know him and fear him always is promised in the same way and manner as is the forgiveness of sin ver 11. And it is hard to affix such a sense unto that Promise as that God will use such and such means that our sins may be pardoned which yet may all of them fail 6. As this Exposition is no way suited unto the words of the Text nor of the Context or scope of the place so indeed it overthrows the nature of the New Covenant and the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ which comes thereby For 1. If the effect itself or the thing mentioned are not promised but only the use of means left unto the liberty of mens wills whether they will comply with them or no then the very Being of the Covenant whether it shall ever have any existence or no depends absolutely on the wills of men and so may not be For it is not the Proposal of the terms of the Covenant and the means whereby we may enter into it that is called the making of this Covenant with us but our real participation of the grace and mercy promised in it This alone gives a real existence unto the Covenant itself without which it is not a Covenant Nor without it is it properly made with any 2. The Lord Christ would be made hereby the Mediator of an uncertain Covenant For if it depend absolutely on the wills of men whether they will accept of the terms of it and comply with it or no it is uncertain what will be the event and whether ever any one will do so or no. For the will being not determined by Grace what its actings will be is altogether uncertain 3. The Covenant can hereon in no sense be a Testament which our Apostle afterwards proves that it is and that irrevocably ratified by the death of the Testator For there can on this supposition be no certain Heir unto whom Christ did bequeath his Goods and the inheritance of Mercy Grace and Glory This would make this Testament inferior unto that of a wise man who determines in particular unto whom his Goods shall come 4. It takes away that difference between this and the former Covenant which it is the main scope of the Apostle to prove at least leave the difference to consist only in the gradual efficacy of outward means which is most remote from his purpose For there were by the Old Covenant means supplied to induce the People unto constant Obedience and those in their kind powerful This is pleaded by Moses in the whole Book almost of Deuteronomy For the scope of all his exhortation unto Obedience is to shew that God had so instructed them in the knowledge of his Will by giving of the Law and had accompanied his teachings with so many signal mercies such effects of his mighty power goodness and grace that the Covenant accompanied with such Promises and Threatnings that therein life and death temporal and eternal were set before them all which made their Obedience so reasonable and necessary that nothing but Profligacy in wickedness could turn them from it To this purpose are discourses multiplied in that Book And yet notwithstanding all this it is added That God had not circumcised their hearts to fear him and obey him always as it is here promised The communication of grace effectual producing infallibly the good things proposed and promised in the minds and hearts of men belonged not unto that Covenant If therefore there be no more in the making of the New Covenant but only the adding of more forcible outward means and motives more suitable unto our Reasons and meet to work on our Affections it differs only in some unassignable degrees from the former But this is directly contrary unto the promise in the Prophet That it shall not be according unto it or of the same kind no more than Christ the High-Priest of it should be a Priest after the Order of Aaron 5. It would on this Supposition follow That God might fulfill his promise of putting his Laws in the minds of men and writing them in their hearts and yet none have the Law put into their minds nor written in their hearts which things are not reconcileable by any distinction unto the ordinary reason of Mankind Wherefore we must grant That it is the effect the event in the communication of the things promised that is ascribed unto this Covenant and not only the use and application of means unto their production And this will yet further appear in the particular Exposition of the several parts of it But yet before we enter thereon two Objections must be removed which may in general be laid against our interpretation 1. This Covenant is promised as that which is future to be brought in at a certain time after those days as hath been declared But it is certain that the things here mentioned the grace and mercy expressed were really communicated unto many both before and after the giving of the Law long ere this Covenant was made For all who truly believed and feared God had these things effected in them by grace wherefore their effectual communication cannot be esteemed a property of this Covenant which was to be made afterwards Ans. This Objection was sufficiently prevented in what we have already discoursed concerning the efficacy of the grace of this Covenant before itself was solemnly consummated For all things of this nature that belong unto it do arise and spring from the mediation of Christ or his interposition on the behalf of sinners wherefore this took place from the giving of the first Promise the administration of the grace of this Covenant did therein and then take its date Howbeit the Lord Christ had not yet done that whereby it was solemnly to be confirmed and that whereon all the vertue of it did depend Wherefore this Covenant is promised now to be made not in opposition unto what grace and mercy was derived from it both before and under the Law nor as unto the first administration of grace from the Mediator of it but in opposition unto the Covenant of Sinai and with respect unto its outward solemn confirmation 2. If the things themselves are promised in the Covenant then all those with whom this Covenant is made must be really and effectually made partakers of them But this is not so they are not all actually sanctified pardoned and saved which are the things here promised Ans. The making of this Covenant may be considered two ways 1 As unto the preparation and proposition of its terms and conditions 2 As unto the internal stipulation between God
of another sort When these things were thus prepared and ordered they stood not for a magnificent shew but were designed unto constant use in the service of God This the Apostle declares in the same order wherein he had described the parts of the Tabernacle in their distribution into the first and the second the outward and inward Tabernacle As to the first Tabernacle wherein were the Candlestick and the Tables and the Shew-bread he declares the use of it 1. With respect unto the persons for whose Ministry it was ordained 2 Of that Ministry itself 3 Of the time and season of its performance 1. The Persons who administred therein were the Priests They and they alone entred into the Sanctuary All others were forbidden to approach unto it on pain of Excision These Priests who had this priviledge were all the posterity of Aaron unless they fell under exception by some legal incapacitating blemish For a long time that is from the preparing of the Tabernacle unto the building of the Temple they administred in this Sanctuary promiscuously under the care of God and directions of the High Priest For the Inspection of the whole was committed in an especial manner unto the High Priest Numb 4. 10. Zech. 3. 7. Yea the actual performance of the daily service of this part of the Sanctuary was in the first place charged on him Exod. 27 21. But the other Priests being designed to help and assist him on all occasions this service in process of time was wholly devolved on them And if the High Priest did at any time minister in this part of the Sanctuary he did it not as the High Priest but as a Priest only for all his peculiar service belonged unto the most Holy Place In process of time when the Priests of the Posterity of Aaron were multiplyed and the services of the Sanctuary were to be encreased by the building of the Temple wherein instead of one candlestick there were ten David by Gods direction cast all the Priests into 24 courses or orders that should serve in their turns two courses in a month which rule continued unto the destruction of the second Temple 1 Chron. 24. Luk. 1. 5. And he did it for sundry ends 1 That none of the Priests of the Posterity of Aaron might be utterly excluded from this Priviledge of approaching unto God in the Sanctuary and if they were it is likely they would have disposed of themselves into other wayes and callings and so have both neglected and defiled the Priesthood 2 That there might be no neglect at any time in the solemn Ministry seeing that which lies on all promiscuously is too often neglected by all For although the High Priest were to keep the charge to judge the house and to keep the courts Zech. 3. 7. and so take care for the due attendance unto the daily Ministration yet was the provision more certain when being ordained by Law or by divine Institution all Persons concerned herein knew the times and seasons wherein they might and wherein they ought to attend on the Altar These were the officers that belonged unto the Sanctuary The Persons who alone might enter into it on a sacred account And when the Structure of the whole was to be taken down that it might be removed from one place to another as it was frequently in the wilderness the whole was to be done by the Priests and all the holy Utensils covered before the Levites were admitted to draw nigh to carry them so as they might not touch them at all Numb 4. 15. Yet must it be observed that although this were the peculiar service of the Priests yet was it not their only service Their whole sacred imployment was not confined unto this their entrance into the Sanctuary There was a work committed unto them whereon their whole service in the Sanctuary did depend This was the offering of Sacrifices which was accomplished in the court without on the brazen Altar before the door of the Tabernacle which belonged not unto the purpose of the Apostle in this Place This was the great priviledge of the Priests under the old Testament that they alone might and did enter into the Sanctuary and make an approach unto God And this priviledge they had as they were Types of Christ and no otherwise But withal it was a great part and a great means of that state of servitude and fear wherein the People or the Body of the Church was kept They might not so much as come nigh the Pledges of Gods Presence it was forbidden them under the penalty of death and being cut off whereof they sadly complained Numb 17. 12 13. This state of things is now changed under the Gospel It is one of the principal priviledges of Believers that being made Kings and Priests unto God by Jesus Christ this distinction as unto especial gracious access unto God is taken away Rev. 1. 5. Ephes. 2. 18. Rom. 5. 2. Neither doth this hinder but that yet there are and ought to be Officers and Ministers in the house of God to dispense the holy things of it and to minister in the name of Christ. For in their so doing they do not hinder but promote the approach of the Church into the presence of God which is the principal end of their office And as this is their peculiar honour for which they must be accountable Heb. 13. 17. So the Church of Believers itself ought alwayes to consider how they may duely improve and walk worthy of this Priviledge purchased for them by the blood of Christ. 2. The general foundation of the service of these Priests in the Sanctuary was that they went or entred into it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This also itself was a divine Ordinance For this entrance both asserted their Priviledge allothers being excluded on pain of Death and gave bounds unto it Hereinto they were to enter but they were to go no further they were not to go into nor look into the most Holy Place nor to abide in the Sanctuary when the High Priest entred into it which the Apostle here hath an especial regard unto They entred into the first Tabernacle but they went no further Hereinto they entred through the first Vail or the covering of the Door of the Tabernacle Exod. 26. 36 37. Through that vail by turning it aside so as that it closed immediately on their entrance the Priests entred into the Sanctuary And this they were to do with an especial Reverence of the Presence of God which is the principal design of that command thou shalt Reverence my Sanctuary Levit. 19. 30. which is now supplyed by the holy reverence of the presence of God in Christ which is in all Believers But moreover the equity of the command extends itself unto that especial reverence of God which we ought to have in all holy services And although this be not confined unto any Postures or Gestures of the Body yet those that naturally express
they believed and in the hopes of it walked with God as our Apostle proves at large chap. 11. Howbeit the way that is the means and cause of communicating the Heavenly Inheritance unto them namely by the Mediation and Sacrifice of Christ was but obscurely represented not illustriously manifested as it is now Life and Immortality being brought to Light by the Gospel And as these things are true so this Interpretation of the words being consonant unto the Analogy of faith is safe only we may enquire whether it be that which is peculiarly intended by the Apostle in this Place or no The Comment of Grotius on these words is that the Apostle signifies super aetherias sedes via eò ducens est evangelium praecepta habens verè coelestia Eam viam Christus primus patefecit aditumque fecit omnibus ad summum coelum Pervenit quidem eò Abrahamus Jacobus ut videre est Mat. 8. 11. alii viri eximii ut videbimus infra cap. 11. 40. Sed hi eò pervenerunt quasi per machinam non viam extraordinariâ quâdum et rarâ Dei dispensatione But these things are most remote from the mind of the Holy Ghost not only in this Place but in the whole Scripture also For 1. How far the Gospel is this way into the Holiest shall be declared immediately That it is so because of the Heavenly precepts which it gives that is which were not given under the old Testament is most untrue For the Gospel gives no precepts of Holiness and obedience that were not for the substance of them contained in the Law There is no precept in the Gospel exceeding that of the Law thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and thy Neighbour as thy self Only the Gospel adds new motives unto Obedience new encouragements and enforcements of it with directions for its due performance 2. That Christ should be no otherwise the way but only as he revealed and declared the Gospel and the precepts of it is not only untrue and injurous unto the honour of Christ but directly contrary unto the design of the Apostle in this Place For he is treating of the Sacerdotal office of Christ only and the Benefit which the Church doth receive thereby But the revelation of the Doctrine or precepts of the Gospel was no duty of that office nor did it belong thereunto That he did as the Prophet of the Church But all his Sacerdotal Actings are towards God in the behalf of the Church as hath been proved 3. That the antient Patriarchs went to Heaven by a secret Engine and that some of them only in an extraordinary way is plainly to deny that they were saved by faith in the promised seed that is that they were not saved by the mediation of Christ which is contrary unto the whole Oeconomy of God in the salvation of the Church and many express Testimonies of the Scripture These Socinian fictions do not cure but corrupt the Word of God and turn away the minds of men from the truth unto fables We shall therefore yet farther enquire into the true meaning of the Holy Ghost in these words The Apostle by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intends the same with ver 3. he called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Holy of Holies the second part of the Sanctuary whereinto the High Priest alone could enter once a year as he declares in the foregoing Verse Only whereas he there spake of the material Fabrick of the Tabernacle and the things contained in it here he designs what was signified thereby For he declares not what these things were but what the Holy Ghost did signifie in and by them Now in that most Holy Place were all the Signs and Pledges of the gracious Presence of God the Testimonies of our Reconciliation by the Blood of the Atonement and our Peace with him thereby Wherefore to enter into these Holies is nothing but an Access with liberty freedom and boldness into the gracious Presence of God on the account of Reconciliation and Peace made with him This the Apostle doth so plainly and positively declare Chap. 10. 19 20 21 22. that I somewhat admire so many worthy and learned Expositors should utterly miss of his meaning in this place The Holies then is the Gracious Presence of God whereunto Believers draw nigh in the confidence of the Atonement made for them and acceptance thereon see Rom. 5. 1 2 3. Ephes. 2. 14 15 16 17 18. Heb. 4. 14 15. Chap. 10. 19. The Atonement being made and received by Faith Conscience being purged Bondage and Fear being removed Believers do now under the Gospel enter with Boldness into this Gracious Presence of God 2. We must consider what is the way into these Holies which was not yet made manifest And here also Expositors indulge unto many Conjectures very needlesly as I suppose For the Apostle doth elsewhere expresly declare himself and interpret his own meaning namely Chap. 10. 19 20. This way is no other but the Sacrifice of Christ the true High Priest of the Church For by the entrance of the High Priest into the most Holy Place with Blood the Holy Ghost did signifie that the way into it namely for Believers to enter by was only the one true Sacrifice which he was to offer and to be And accordingly to give an Indication of the accomplishment of their Type when he expired on the Cross having offered himself unto God for the Expiation of our Sins the Vail of the Temple which enclosed and secured this Holy Place from any entrance into it was rent from the top to the bottom whereby it was laid open unto all Matth. 27. 51. And an evidence this is that the Lord Christ offered his great expiatory Sacrifice in his Death here on Earth a true and real Sacrifice and that it was not an Act of Power after his Ascension metaphorically called a Sacrifice as the Socinians dream For until that Sacrifice was offered the way could not be opened into the Holies which it was immediately after his Death and signified by the renting of the Vail This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the onely way whereby we enter into the most Holy Place the Gracious Presence of God and that with boldness 3. Of this way it is affirmed that it was not yet made manifest whil'st the first Tabernacle was standing And a word is peculiarly chosen by the Apostle to signifie his intention He doth not say that there was no way then into the most Holy Place none made none provided none made use of But there was not a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an open manifestation of it There was an entrance under the Old Testament into the Presence of God as unto Grace and Glory namely the vertue of the Oblation of Christ But this was not as yet made manifest Three things were wanting thereunto 1. It was not yet actually existent but only was vertually so The
that he did not do it by the blood of Goats and Calves and this is introduced with the disjunctive negative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 neither which refers unto what was before denied of him as unto his entrance into the Tabernacle made with hands He did not do so neither did he make his entrance by the blood of Calves and Goats A difference from and opposition unto the entrance of the High Priest annually into the Holy Place is intended It must therefore be considered how he so entred This entrance is at large described Lev. 16. And 1 It was by the blood of a Bullock and a Goat which the Apostle here renders in the plural number Calves and Goats because of the annual repetition of the same Sacrifice 2 The order of the Institution was that first the Bullock or Calf was offered then the Goat the one for the Priest the other for the People This order belonging not at all unto the purpose of the Apostle he expresseth it otherwise Goats and Calves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Goat a word that expresseth Totum genus Caprinum that whole kind of Creature be it young or old So the Goats of his offering were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Kids ver 5. that is young He-Goats for the precise time of their age is not determined So the Bullock the Priest offered for himself was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 juvencus ex genere bovino which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for it expresseth genus vitulinum all young Cattel Concerning these it is intimated in this negative as unto Christ that the High Priest entred into the Holy Place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by their blood which we must enquire into Two things belonged unto the office of the High Priest with respect unto this blood For 1 He was to offer the blood both of the Bullock and the Goat at the Altar for a sin-offering Lev. 16. 6 11. For it was the blood wherewith alone Atonement was to be made for sin and that at the Altar Lev. 17. 11. so far is it from truth that expiation for sin was made only in the Holy Place and that it is so by Christ without blood as the Socinians imagine 2 He was to carry some of the blood of the Sacrifice into the Sanctuary to sprinkle it there to make Atonement for the Holy Place in the sense before declared And the enquiry is which of these the Apostle hath respect unto Some say it is the latter and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here is put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by for with He entred with the blood of Goats and Calves namely that which he carried with him into the Holy Place So plead the Socinians and those that follow them with design to overthrow the Sacrifice which Christ offered in his Death and bloodsheding confining the whole expiation of sin in their sense of it unto what is done in Heaven But I have before disproved this surmise And the Apostle is so far from using the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 improperly for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so to frame a comparison between things wherein indeed there was no similitude as they dream that he useth it on purpose to exclude the sense which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with would intimate For he doth not declare with what the High Priest entred into the Holy Place for he entred with Incense as well as with blood but what it was by vertue whereof he so entred as to be accepted with God So it is expresly directed Lev. 16. 2 3. Speak unto Aaron that he come not at all times into the Holy Place with a young Bullock for a sin-offering and a Ram for a burnt-offering shall he come Aaron was not to bring the Bullock into the Holy Place but he had Right to enter into it by the Sacrifice of it at the Altar Thus therefore the High Priest entred into the Holy Place by the blood of Goats and Calves namely by vertue of the Sacrifice of their blood which he had offered without at the Altar And so all things do exactly correspond between the Type and the Antitype For 2. It is affirmed positively of him that he entred by his own blood and that in opposition unto the other way 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but by his own blood It is a vain speculation contrary to the Analogie of faith and destructive of the true nature of the oblation of Christ and inconsistent with the dignity of his Person that he should carry with him into Heaven a part of that material blood which was shed for us on the earth This some have invented to maintain a comparison in that wherein is none intended The design of the Apostle is only to declare by vertue of what he entred as a Priest into the Holy Place And this was by vertue of his own blood when it was shed when he offered himself unto God This was that which laid the foundation of and gave him right unto the administration of his Priestly office in Heaven And hereby were all those good things procured which he effectually communicates unto us in and by that Administration This Exposition is the Center of all Gospel-Mysteries the object of the Admiration of Angels and Men unto all eternity What heart can conceive what tongue can express the Wisdom Grace and Love that is contained therein This alone is the stable foundation of faith in our access unto God Two things present themselves unto us 1. The unspeakable Love of Christ in offering himself and his own blood for us See Gal. 2. 20. Rev. 1. 5. 1 Ioh. 3. 16. Ephes. 5. 26 27. There being no other way whereby our sins might be purged and expiated chap. 10. 5 6 7. out of his infinite Love and Grace he condescended unto this way whereby God might be glorified and his Church sanctified and saved It were well if we did always consider aright what Love what Thankfulness what Obedience are due unto him on the account hereof 2. The Excellency and Efficacy of his Sacrifice is hereby demonstrated that through him our faith and hope may be in God He who offered this Sacrifice was the onely begotten of the Father the Eternal Son of God That which he offered was his own Blood God purchased his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. How unquestionable how perfect must the Atonement be that was thus made how glorious the Redemption that was procured thereby This is that which the Apostle mentions in the close of this Verse as the effect of his Blood-shedding Having obtained eternal Redemption The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is variously rendered as we have seen The Vulgar Latin reads Redemptione aeterna inventa And those that follow it do say that things rare and so sought after are said to be found And Chrysost. inclines unto that Notion of the word But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
is used in all good Authors for not only to find but to obtain by our endeavors so do we render it and so we ought to do Rom. 4. 1. Heb. 4. 16. He obtained effectually Eternal Redemption by the price of his Blood And it is mentioned in a Tense denoting the time past to signifie that he had thus obtained Eternal Redemption before he entred into the Holy Place How he obtained it we shall see in the consideration of the nature of the thing it self that was obtained Three things must be inquired into with what brevity we can for the Explication of these words 1 What is Redemption 2 Why is this Redemption called Eternal 3 How Christ obtained it 1. All Redemption respects a state of Bondage and Captivity with all the Events that do attend it The Object of it or those to be redeemed are only persons in that estate There is mention ver 15. of the Redemption of Transgressions but it is by a Metonymy of the Cause for the Effect It is Transgressions which cast men into that state from whence they are to be redeemed But both in the Scripture and in the common Notion of the word Redemption is the deliverance of persons from a state of Bondage And this may be done two ways 1 By Power 2 By payment of a Price That which is in the former way is only improperly and metaphorically so called For it is in its own nature a bare deliverance and is termed Redemption only with respect to the state of Captivity from whence it is a deliverance It is a vindication into liberty by any means So the deliverance of the Israelites from Egypt though wrought meerly by Acts of Power is called their Redemption And Moses from his Ministry in that work is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Redeemer Acts 7. 35. But this Redemption is only metaphorically so called with respect unto the state of Bondage wherein the people were That which is properly so is by a Price paid as a valuable consideration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Ransom a price of Redemption Thence are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Redemption and a Redeemer So the Redemption that is by Christ is every-where said to be a Price a Ransom See Mat. 20. 28. Mark 10. 45. 1 Cor. 6. 20. 1 Tim. 2. 6. 1 Pet. 1. 18 19. It is the deliverance of persons out of a state of Captivity and Bondage by the payment of a valuable price or Ransom And the Socinians offer violence not only to the Scripture but to common sense it self when they contend that the Redemption which is constantly affirmed to be by a Price is metaphorical and that only proper which is by Power The Price or Ransom in this Redemption is two ways expressed 1 By that which gave it its worth and value that it might be a sufficient Ransom for all 2 By its especial nature The first is the Person of Christ himself He gave himself for us Gal. 2. 20. He gave himself a Ransom for all 1 Tim. 2. 6. He offered himself to God ver 14. Eph. 5. 2. This was that which made the Ransom of an infinite value meet to redeem the whole Church God purchased the Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. The especial nature of it is that it was by Blood by his own Blood See Eph. 1. 7. 1 Pet. 1. 18 19. And this Blood of Christ was a Ransom or Price of Redemption partly from the unvaluableness of that Obedience which he yielded unto God in the shedding of it and partly because this Ransom was also to be an Atonement as it was offered unto God in Sacrifice For it is by Blood and no otherwise that Atonement is made Lev. 17. 11. Wherefore he is set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood Rom. 3. 24 25. That the Lord Jesus Christ did give himself a Ransom for Sin that he did it in the shedding of his Blood for us wherein he made his Soul an offering for Sin that herein and hereby he made Atonement and expiated our Sins and that all these things belonged unto our Redemption is the substance of the Gospel That this Redemption is nothing but the Expiation of Sin and that Expiation of Sin nothing but an Act of Power and Authority in Christ now in Heaven as the Socinians dream is to reject the whole Gospel Though the nature of this Redemption be usually spoken unto yet we must not here wholly put it by And the nature of it will appear in the consideration of the state from whence we are redeemed with the causes of it 1 The Meritorious Cause of it was Sin or our Original Apostasie from God Hereby we lost our primitive liberty with all the rights and priviledges thereunto belonging 2 The Supreme Efficient Cause is God himself As the Ruler and Iudge of all he cast all Apostates into a state of Captivity and Bondage For Liberty is nothing but peace with him But he did it with this difference Sinning Angels he designed to leave irrecoverably under this condition For Mankind he would find a Ransom 3 The Instrumental Cause of it was the Curse of the Law This falling on men brings them into a state of Bondage For it separates as to all relation of love and peace between God and them and gives life unto all the actings of sin and death wherein the misery of that state consists To be separate from God to be under the power of sin and death is to be in Bondage 4 The External Cause by the application of all other causes unto the Souls and Consciences of men is Satan His was the power of darkness his the power of death over men in that state and condition that is to make application of the terror of it unto their Souls as threatned in the Curse Heb. 2. 14 15. Hence he appears as the Head of this state of Bondage and men are in Captivity unto him He is not so in himself but as the external application of the causes of Bondage is committed unto him From hence it is evident that four things are required unto that Redemption which is a deliverance by Price or Ransom from this state For 1 it must be by such a Ransom as whereby the Guilt of Sin is expiated which was the Meritorious Cause of our Captivity Hence it is called the Redemption of Transgressions ver 14. that is of persons from that state and condition whereinto they were cast by sin or transgression 2 Such as wherewith in respect of God Atonement must be made and satisfaction unto his Justice as the Supreme Ruler and Judge of all 3 Such as whereby the Curse of the Law might be removed which could not be without undergoing of it 4 Such as whereby the Power of Satan might be destroyed How all this was done by the Blood of Christ I have at large declared elsewhere 2. This Redemption is said to be Eternal And it is so on
Divine Nature But I shall leave the Reader to chuse whether sense he judgeth suitable unto the scope of the place either of them being so unto the Analogy of Faith The Socinians understanding that both these Interpretations are equally destructive to their Opinions the one concerning the Person of Christ the other about the Nature of the Holy Ghost have invented a sense of these words never before heard of among Christians For they say that by the Eternal Spirit a certain Divine Power is intended whereby the Lord Christ was freed from Mortality and made Eternal that is no more obnoxious unto death By virtue of this Power they say he offered himself unto God when he entred into Heaven than which nothing can be spoken more fond or impious or contrary unto the design of the Apostle For 1 Such a Power as they pretend is no where called the Spirit much less the Eternal Spirit and to feign significations of words without any countenance from their use elsewhere is to wrest them at our pleasure 2 The Apostle is so far from requiring a Divine Power rendering him immortal antecedently unto the offering of himself as that he declares that he offered himself by the Eternal Spirit in his death when he shed his blood whereby our consciences are purged from dead works 3 This Divine Power rendering Christ immortal is not peculiar unto him but shall be communicated unto all that are raised unto glory at the last day And there is no colour of an opposition herein unto what was done by the High Priests of old 4 It proceeds on their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this matter which is that the Lord Christ offered not himself unto God before he was made immortal which is utterly to exclude his death and blood from any concernment therein which is as contrary unto the truth and scope of the place as darkness is to light 5 Wherever there is mention made elsewhere in the Scripture of the Holy Spirit or the Eternal Spirit or the Spirit absolutely with reference unto any actings of the Person of Christ or on it either the Holy Spirit or his own Divine Nature is intended See Isa. 61. 1 2. Rom. 1. 3. 1 Pet. 3. 18. Wherefore Grotius forsakes this Notion and otherwise explains the words Spiritus Christi qui non tantum fuit vivus ut in vita terrena sed in aeternum corpus sibi adjunctum vivificans If there be any sense in these words it is the rational Soul of Christ that is intended And it is most true that the Lord Christ offered himself in and by the actings of it For there are no other in the Humane Nature as to any duties of obedience unto God But that this here should be called the Eternal Spirit is a vain conjecture For the spirits of all men are equally eternal and do not only live here below but quicken their Bodies after the Resurrection for ever This therefore cannot be the ground of the especial efficacy of the blood of Christ. This is the second thing wherein the Apostle opposeth the Offering of Christ unto the offerings of the Priests under the Law 1 They offered Bulls and Goats He offered Himself 2 They offered by a material Altar and Fire He by the Eternal Spirit That Christ should thus offer Himself unto God and that by the Eternal Spirit is the center of the mystery of the Gospel An attempt to corrupt to pervert this glorious Truth are designs against the Glory of God and Faith of the Church The depth of this mystery we cannot dive into the height we cannot comprehend We cannot search out the greatness of it of the wisdom the love the grace that is in it And those who chuse rather to reject it than to live by Faith in an humble admiration of it do it at the peril of their souls Unto the Reason of some men it may be Folly unto Faith it is full of Glory In the consideration of the Divine Actings of the Eternal Spirit of Christ in the offering of himself of the holy exercise of all grace in the humane nature that was offered of the nature dignity and efficacy of this Sacrifice Faith finds life food and refreshment Herein doth it contemplate the wisdom the righteousness the holiness and grace of God herein doth it view the wonderful condescension and love of Christ and from the whole is strengthned and encouraged Thirdly It is added that he thus offered himself without spot This Adjunct is descriptive not of the Priest but of the Sacrifice it is not a qualification of his Person but of the Offering Schlictingius would have it that this word denotes not what Christ was in himself but what he was freed from For now in Heaven where he offered himself he is freed from all infirmities and from any spot of mortality which the High Priest was not when he entered into the Holy Place such irrational fancies do false Opinions force men to take up withal But 1 There was no spot in the mortality of Christ that he should be said to be freed from it when he was made immortal A spot signifies not so much a desect as a fault And there was no fault in Christ from which he was freed 2 The Allusion and respect herein unto the legal institutions is evident and manifest The Lamb that was to be slain and offered was antecedently thereunto to be without blemish it was to be neither lame nor blind nor have any other defect With express respect hereunto the Apostle Peter affirms that we were redeemed with the precious blood of Christ as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot 1 Pet. 1. 18. And Christ is not only called the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world John 1. 29. that is by his being slain and offered but is represented in the worship of the Church as a Lamb slain Rev. 5. 6. It is therefore to offer violence unto the Scripture and common understanding to seek for this qualification any where but in the humane nature of Christ antecedently unto his death and blood-shedding Wherefore this expression without spot respects in the first place the purity of his Nature and the holiness of his Life For although this principally belonged unto the necessary qualifications of his Person yet were they required unto him as he was to be the Sacrifice He was the Holy One of God holy barmless undefiled separate from sinners he did no sin neither was guile found in his mouth he was without spot This is the moral sense and signification of the word But there is a legal sense of it also It is that which is meet and fit to be a Sacrifice For it respects all that was signified by the legal institution concerning the integrity and perfection of the Creatures Lambs or Kids that were to be sacrificed Hence were all those Laws fulfilled and accomplished There was nothing in him nothing wanting unto him that
the infallible connexion of these things the blood of Christ and the purging of the Conscience that is in all that betake themselves thereunto It shall do it that is effectually and infallibly 2. Respect is had herein unto the generality of the Hebrews whether already professing the Gospel or now invited unto it And he proposeth this unto them as the advantage they should be made partakers of by the relinquishment of Mosaical Ceremonies and betaking themselves unto the Faith of the Gospel For whereas before by the best of legal Ordinances they attained no more but an outward sanctification as unto the flesh they should now have their Conscience infallibly purged from dead works Hence it is said your Conscience Some Copies read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our But there is no difference in the sense I shall retain the common reading as that which refers unto the Hebrews who had been always exercised unto thoughts of Purification and Sanctification by one means or another For the Explication of the words we must enquire 1 What is meant by dead works 2 What is their relation unto Conscience 3 How Conscience is purged of them by the blood of Christ. 1. By dead works sins as unto their guilt and defilement are intended as all acknowledge And several Reasons are given why they are so called As 1 Because they proceed from a principle of spiritual death or are the works of them who have no vital principle of holiness in them Eph. 2. 1 5. Col. 2. 13. 2 Because they are useless and fruitless as all dead things are 3 They deserve death and tend thereunto Hence they are like rotten bones in the Grave accompanied with worms and corruption And these things are true Howbeit I judge there is a peculiar reason why the Apostle calls them dead works in this place For there is an allusion herein unto dead bodies and legal defilement by them For he hath respect unto Purification by the Ashes of the Heifer And this respected principally uncleanness by the dead as is fully declared in the institution of that Ordinance As men were purified by the sprinkling of the Ashes of an Heifer mingled with living water from defilements contracted by the dead without which they were separated from God and the Church so unless men are really purged from their moral defilements by the blood of Christ they must perish for ever Now this defilement from the dead as we have shewed arose from hence that Death was the effect of the Curse of the Law wherefore the guilt of sin with respect unto the Curse of the Law is here intended in the first place and consequently its pollution This gives us the state of all men who are not interessed in the Sacrifice of Christ and the purging vertue thereof As they are dead in themselves dead in trespasses and sins so all their works are dead works Other works they have none They are as a Sepulchre filled with bones and corruption Every thing they do is unclean in it self and unclean unto them Unto them that are defiled nothing is pure but even their mind and conscience is defiled Tit. 1. 15. Their works come from spiritual death and tend unto eternal death and are dead in themselves Let them deck and trim their carkases whil'st they please let them â—end their faces with paintings and multiply their ornaments with all excess of bravery within they are full of dead bones of rotten defiled polluting works That world which appears with so much outward beauty lustre and glory is all polluted and defiled under the eye of the most Holy 2. These dead works are further described by their relation unto our persons as unto what is peculiarly affected with them where they have as it were their seat and residence And this is the Conscience He doth not say purge your souls or your minds or your persons but your conscience And this he doth 1 In general in opposition unto the purification by the Law It was there the dead body that did defile it was the body that was defiled it was the body that was purified those Ordinances sanctified to the purifying of the flesh But the defilements here intended are spiritual internal relating unto Conscience and therefore such is the purification also 2 He mentions the respect of these dead works unto Conscience in particular because it is Conscience which is concerned in peace with God and confidence of approach unto him Sin variously affects all the faculties of the soul and there is in it a peculiar defilement of Conscience Tit. 1. 15. But that wherein Conscience in the first place is concerned and wherein it is alone concerned is a sense of guilt This brings along with it fear and dread whence the sinner dares not approach into the presence of God It was Conscience which reduced Adam into the condition of hiding himself from God his eyes being opened by a sense of the guilt of sin So he that was unclean by the touching of a dead body was excluded from all approach unto God in his worship Hereunto the Apostle alludes in the following words That we may serve the living God For the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly denotes that service which consists in the observation and performance of solemn worship As he who was unclean by a dead body might not approach unto the worship of God until he was purified So a guilty sinner whose Conscience is affected with a sense of the guilt of sin dares not to draw nigh unto or appear in the presence of God It is by the working of Conscience that sin deprives the soul of peace with God of boldness or confidence before him of all right to draw nigh unto him Until this relation of sin unto the Conscience be taken away until there be no more conscience of sin as the Apostle speaks Chap. 10. 2. that is Conscience absolutely judging and condemning the person of the sinner in the sight of God there is no right no liberty of access unto God in his service nor any acceptance to be obtained with him Wherefore the purging of Conscience from dead works doth first respect the guilt of sin and the vertue of the blood of Christ in the removal of it But 2dly there is also an inherent defilement of Conscience by sin as of all other faculties of the soul. Hereby it is rendred unmeet for the discharge of its office in any particular duties With respect hereunto Conscience is here used Synecdochically for the whole soul and all the faculties of it yea our whole spirit souls and bodies which are all to be cleansed and sanctified 1 Thes. 5. 23. To purge our Conscience is to purge us in our whole persons This being the state of our Conscience this being the respect of dead works and their defilement to it and us we may consider the relief that is necessary in this case and what that is which is here proposed 1. Unto
a compleat relief in this condition two things are necessary 1 A discharge of Conscience from a sense of the guilt of sin or the condemning power of it whereby it deprives us of peace with God and of boldness in access unto him 2 The cleansing of the Conscience and consequently our whole persons from the inherent defilement of sin The first of these was typified by the blood of Bulls and Goats offered on the Altar to make Atonement The latter was represented by the sprinkling of the unclean with the Ashes of the Heiser unto their purification Both these the Apostle here expresly ascribes unto the Blood of Christ and we may briefly enquire into three things concerning it 1 On what ground it doth produce this blessed effect 2 The way of its operation and efficacy unto this end 3 The Reason whence the Apostle affirms that it shall much more do this than the legal Ordinances could sanctifying unto the purifying of the flesh 1. The grounds of its efficacy unto this purpose are three 1. That it was Blood offered unto God God had ordained that Blood should be offered on the Altar to make Atonement for sin or to purge Conscience from dead works That this could not be really effected by the Blood of Bulls and Goats is evident in the nature of the things themselves and demonstrated in the event Howbeit this must be done by Blood or all the institution of legal Sacrifices were nothing but means to deceive the minds of men and ruine their souls To say that at one time or other real Atonement is not to be made for Sin by Blood and Conscience thereby to be purged and purified is to make God a Lyar in all the Institutions of the Law But this must be done by the Blood of Christ or not at all 2 It was the Blood of Christ. Of Christ the Son of the living God Mat. 16. 18. whereby God purchased his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. The dignity of his Person gave efficacy unto his Office and Offering No other person in the discharge of the same Offices that were committed unto him could have saved the Church and therefore all those by whom his Divine Person is denied do also evacuate his Offices By what they ascribe unto them it is impossible the Church should be either sanctified or saved They resolve all into a meer Act of Sovereign Power in God which make the Cross of Christ of none effect 3 He offered this Blood or himself by the eternal Spirit Though Christ in his Divine Person was the Eternal Son of God yet was it the humane nature only that was offered in Sacrifice Howbeit it was offered by and with the concurrent actings of the Divine Nature or Eternal Spirit as we have declared These things make the Blood of Christ as offered meet and fit for the accomplishment of this great effect 2. The second Enquiry is concernig the way whereby the Blood of Christ doth thus purge our Conscience from dead works Two things as we have seen are contained therein 1 The expiation or taking away the guilt of sin that Conscience should not be deterred thereby from an access unto God 2 The cleansing of our souls from vicious defiling habits inclinations and acts or all inherent uncleanness Wherefore under two considerations doth the Blood of Christ produce this double effect First As it was offered so it made Atonement for Sin by giving satisfaction unto the Justice and Law of God This all the expiatory Sacrifices of the Law did prefigure this the Prophets foretold and this the Gospel witnesseth unto To deny it is to deny any real efficacy in the Blood of Christ unto this end and so expresly to contradict the Apostle Sin is not purged from the Conscience unless the guilt of it be so removed as that we may have peace with God and boldness in access unto him This is given us by the Blood of Christ as offered Secondly As it is sprinkled it worketh the second part of this effect And this sprinkling of the Blood of Christ is the communication of its sanctifying vertue unto our souls see Eph. 5. 26 27. Tit. 2. 14. so doth the Blood of Christ the Son of God cleanse us from all our sins 1 John 1. 7. Zech. 13. 2. 3. The Reason why the Apostle affirms that this is much more to be expected from the Blood of Christ than the Purification of the Flesh was from legal Ordinances hath been before spoken unto The Socinians plead on this place that this effect of the death of Christ doth as unto us depend on our own duty If they intended no more but that there is duty required on our part unto an actual participation of it namely Faith whereby we receive the Atonement we should have no difference with them But they are otherwise minded This purging of the conscience from dead works they would have to consist in two things 1 Our own relinquishment of sin 2 The freeing us from the punishment due to sin by an act of power in Christ in Heaven The first they say hath therein respect unto the blood of Christ in that thereby his doctrine was confirmed in obedience whereunto we forsake sin and purge our minds from it The latter also relates thereunto in that the sufferings of Christ were antecedent unto his Exaltation and Power in Heaven Wherefore this effect of the blood of Christ is what we do our selves in obedience unto his doctrine and what he doth thereon by his power and therefore may well be said to depend on our duty But all this while there is nothing ascribed unto the blood of Christ as it was offered in Sacrifice unto God or shed in the offering of himself which alone the Apostle speaks unto in this place Others chuse thus to oppose it This purging of our consciences from dead works is not an immediate effect of the death of Christ but it is a benefit contained therein which upon our faith and obedience we are made partakers of But 1 This is not in my judgment to interpret the Apostles words with due reverence he affirms expresly that the blood of Christ doth purge our conscience from dead works that is it doth make such an Atonement for sin and Expiation of it as that conscience shall be no more pressed with it nor condemn the sinner for it 2 The blood of Christ is the immediate cause of every effect assigned unto it where there is no concurrent nor intermediate cause of the same kind with it in the production of that effect 3 It is granted that the actual communication of this effect of the death of Christ unto our Souls is wrought according unto the method which God in his sovereign wisdom and pleasure hath designed And herein 1 the Lord Christ by his blood made actual and absolute Atonement for the sins of all the Elect. 2 This Atonement is proposed unto us in the Gospel Rom. 3. 25. 3 It
was a Covenant did consist 2. There was a Promise and Conveyance of an Inheritance unto them namely of the Land of Canaan with all the Priviledges of it God declared that the land was his and that he gave it unto them for an Inheritance And this Promise or Grant was made unto them without any consideration of their previous Obedience out of meer love and Grace The principal design of the Book of Deuteronomy is to inlay this Principle in the foundation of their obedience Now the free Grant and Donation of an Inheritance of the Goods of him that makes the Grant is properly a Testament A free disposition it was of the Goods of the Testator 3. There was in the confirmation of this Grant the intervention of Death The Grant of the Inheritance of the Land that God made was confirmed by death and the Blood of the Beasts offered in sacrifice whereof we must treat on v. 18 19 20. And although Covenants were confirmed by Sacrifices as this was so far as it was a Covenant namely with the Blood of them yet as in those Sacrifices death was comprised it was to confirm the Testamentary Grant of the Inheritance For death is necessary unto the Confirmation of a Testament which then could only be in Type and Representation the Testator himself was not to die for the establishment of a Typical Inheritance Wherefore the Apostle having discoursed before concerning the Covenant as it prescribed and required Obedience with Promises and Penalties annexed unto it He now treats of it as unto the Donation and Communication of Good things by it with the Confirmation of the Grant of them by death in which sense it was a Testament and not a Covenant properly so called And the arguing of the Apostle from this word is not only just and reasonable but without it we could never have rightly understood the Typical Representation that was made of the Death Blood and Sacrifice of Christ in the Confirmation of the New Testament as we shall see immediately This difficulty being removed we may proceed in the Exposition of the words That which first occurs is the Note of Connexion in the Conjunction And. But it doth not here as sometimes infer a Reason of what was spoken before but is emphatically expletive and denotes a progress in the present Argument As much as Also Moreover 2. There is the Ground of the ensuing Assertion or the manner of its Introduction For this cause Some say that it looks backward and intimates a Reason of what was spoken before or why it was necessary that our Consciences should be purged from dead works by the Blood of Christ namely because he was the Mediator of the new Covenant others say it looks forward and gives a reason why he was to be the Mediator of the new Testament namely that by the means of Death for the Transgressions c. It is evident that there is a reason rendred in these words of the necessity of the death and Sacrifice of Christ by which alone our Consciences may be purged from dead works And this reason is intended in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For this cause And this necessity of the death of Christ the Apostle proves both from the nature of his office namely that he was to be the Mediator of the new Covenant which being a Testament required the death of the Testator and from what was to be effected thereby namely the Redemption of Transgressions and the purchase of an eternal Inheritance Wherefore these are the things which he hath respect unto in these words For this cause But withal the Apostle in this verse enlargeth his discourse as designing to comprehend in it the whole dispensation of the will and Grace of God unto the Church in Christ with the Ground and Reason of it This reason he layeth down in this verse giving an account of the effects of it in those that follow Hereunto respect is had in this expression For the exposition of the words themselves that is the declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost and nature of the things contained in them we must leave the order of the words and take that of the things themselves And the things ensuing are declared in them 1 That God designed an eternal Inheritance unto some persons 2 The way and manner of conveying a Right and Title thereunto was by promise 3 That the Persons unto whom this Inheritance is designed are those that are called 4 That there was an obstacle unto the enjoyment of this Inheritance which was Transgression against the first Covenant 5 That this obstacle might be removed and the Inheritance enjoyed God made a New Covenant because none of the Rites Ordinances or Sacrifices of the first Covenant could remove that Obstacle or expiate those Sins 6 The Ground of the Efficacy of the New Covenant unt o this End was That it had a Mediator an High Priest such as had been already described 7 The way and means whereby the Mediator of the New Covenant did expiate Sins under the Old was by death nor could it otherwise be done seeing this New Covenant being a Testament also required the death of the Testator 8 This Death of the Mediator of the new Testament did take away sins by the Redemption of them For the Redemption of Transgressions All which must be opened for the due Exposition of these words 1. God designed unto some an Eternal Inheritance And both the Reason of this grant with the nature of it must be enquired into 1 As unto the Reason of it God in our first Creation gave unto man whom he made his Son and Heir as unto things here below a great Inheritance of meer Grace and Bounty This Inheritance consisted in the use of all the Creatures here below in a just Title unto them and dominion over them Neither did it consist absolutely in these things but as they were a Pledge of the present favour of God and of mans future blessedness upon his Obedience This whole Inheritance man forfeited by sin God also took the forfeiture and ejected him out of the possession of it and utterly despoiled him of his Title unto it Nevertheless he designed unto some another Inheritance even that should not be lost that should be eternal It is altogether vain and foolish to seek for any other Cause or Reason of the preparation of this Inheritance and the designation of it unto any person but only his own Grace Bounty his sovereign Will and Pleasure What merit of it what means of attaining it could be found in them who were considered under no other Qualifications but such as had wofully rejected that Inheritance which before they were instated in And therefore is it called an Inheritance to mind us that the way whereby we come unto it is gratuitous Adoption and not purchase or merit 2 As unto the Nature of it it is declared in the Adjunct mentioned it is eternal
The Redemption or Expiation of Sins is confined unto those under the Old Testament whence it should seem that there is none made for those under the New Ans. The Emphasis of the Expression Sins under the Old Testament respect either the Time when the sins intended were committed or the Testament against which they were committed And the Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will admit of either sense Take it in the first way and the Argument follows à fortiori as unto the Sins committed under the New Testament though there be no Expiation of Sins against it which properly are only final Unbelief and Impenitency For the Expiation intended is made by the Mediator of the New Testament And if he expiated the Sins that were under the first Testament that is of those who lived and dyed whil'st that Covenant was in force much more doth he do so for them who live under the Administration of that Testament whereof he is the Mediator For Sins are taken away by vertue of that Testament whereunto they do belong And it is with peculiar respect unto them that the blood of Christ is called the blood of the New Testament for the Redemption of Sins But yet more probably the meaning may be the Sins that were and are committed against that first Covenant or the Law and Rule of it For whereas that Covenant did in its Administration comprise the Moral Law which was the substance and foundation of it all Sins whatever have their form and nature with respect thereunto So Sins under the first Covenant are all Sins whatever For there is no Sin committed under the Gospel but it is a Sin against that Law which requires us to love the Lord our God with all our hearts and all our strength Either way the Sins of them who are called under the New Testament are included 2. It is enquired whether it is the Nature of the Sins intended that is respected or the Persons guilty of them also under that Testament The Syriac Translation avoids this difficulty by rendring the words of the Abstract the Redemption of Transgressions in the Concrete a Redeemer unto them who had transgressed That it is a certain sort of Sins that is intended Socinus was the first that invented And his invention is the foundation of the Exposition not only of Schlictingius but of Grotius also on this place Such Sins they say they are as for which no Expiation was to be made by the Sacrifices of the Law Sins of a greater Nature than could be expiated by them For they only made Expiation of some smaller Sins as Sins of Ignorance or the like But there is no respect unto the Persons of them who lived under that Testament whom they will not grant to be redeemed by the blood of Christ. Wherefore according unto them the difference between the Expiation of Sin by the Sacrifices of the Law and that by the Sacrifice of Christ doth not consist in their nature that the one did it only typically and in an external representation by the purifying of the flesh the other really and effectually but in this that the one expiated lesser Sins only the other greater also But there is nothing sound or consonant unto the Truth in this Interpretation of the words For 1 It proceeds on a false Supposition that there were Sins of the people not only presumptuous Sins and which had impenitency in them for which no Atonement was made nor Expiation of them allowed which is expresly contrary unto Lev. 16. 16 21. And whereas some offences were capital amongst them for which no Atonement was allowed to free the Sinner from death yet that belonged unto the Political Rule of the people and hindred not but that typically all sorts of Sins were to be expiated 2 It is contrary unto the express design of the Apostle For he had proved before by all sorts of Arguments that the Sacrifices of the Law could not expiate any Sin could not purge the Conscience from dead works that they made nothing perfect And this he speaks not of this or that Sin but of every Sin wherein the Conscience of a Sinner is concerned Chap. 10. 2. Hence two things follow First That they did not in and of themselves really expiate any one Sin small or great It was impossible saith the Apostle that they should do so Heb. 10. 4. only they sanctified to the purifying of the flesh which overthrows the foundation of this Exposition Secondly That they did typifie and represent the Expiation of all sorts of Sins whatever and made application of it unto their Souls For if it was so that there was no Atonement for their Sins that their Consciences were not purged from dead works nor themselves consummate but only had some outward purification of the flesh it cannot be but they must all eternally perish But that this was not their condition the Apostle proves from hence because they were called of God unto an eternal Inheritance as he had proved at large concerning Abraham Chap. 6. Hence he infers the necessity of the mediation and death of Christ as without the vertue whereof all the called under the first Covenant must perish eternally there being no other way to come to the Inheritance 3. Whereas the Apostle mentions only the Sins under the first Covenant as unto the time passed before the Exhibition of Christ in the flesh or the death of the Mediator of the New Testament what is to be thought of them who lived during that season who belonged not unto the Covenant but were strangers from it such as are described Eph. 4. 12. I answer The Apostle takes no notice of them and that because taking them generally Christ dyed not for them Yea that he did not so is sufficiently proved from this place Those who live and dye strangers from God's Covenant have no interest in the Mediation of Christ. Wherein the Redemption of these Transgressions did consist shall be declared in its proper place And we may observe 1. Such is the malignant Nature of Sin of all Transgression of the Law that unless it be removed unless it be taken out of the way no Person can enjoy the Promise of the Eternal Inheritance 2. It was the Work of God alone to contrive and it was the Effect of infinite Wisdom and Grace to provide a way for the removal of Sin that it might not be an everlasting Obstacle against the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance unto them that are called Fifthly We have declared the design of God here represented unto us who are the Persons towards whom it was to be accomplished and what lay in the way as an hindrance of it That which remains in the words is the way that God took and the means that he used for the removal of that hindrance and the effectual accomplishment of his design This in general was first the making of a New Testament He had fully proved before that this could not
be done by that Covenant against which the Sins were committed neither by the Priests nor Sacrifices nor any other Duties of it Therefore had he promised the Abolition of it because of its weakness and insufficiency unto this end as also the introduction of a new to supply its defects as we have seen at large in the Exposition of the foregoing Chapter For it became the Wisdom Goodness and Grace of God upon the removal of the other for its insufficiency to establish another that should be every way effectual unto his purpose namely the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance unto them that are called But then the Enquiry will be How this Covenant or Testament shall effect this end what is in it what belongs unto it that should be so effectual and by what means it might attain this end All these are declared in the words And Sixthly In general all this arose from hence that it had a Mediator and that the Lord Christ the Son of God was this Mediator The dignity of his Person and thereon both the Excellency and Efficacy of his Priestly Office whereunto alone respect is had in his being called here a Mediator he had abundantly before demonstrated Although the word in general be of a larger signification as we have declared on Chap. 8. 6. yet here it is restrained unto his Priestly Office and his acting therein For whereas he had treated of that alone in the foregoing Chapter here declaring the Grounds and Reasons of the necessity of it he says for this cause is he the Mediator And proceeding to shew in what sense he considers him as a Mediator doth it by his being a Testator and dying which belongs to his Priestly Office alone And the sole end which in this place he assigns unto his Mediatory Office is his death That by means of death Whereas therefore there were Sins committed under the first Covenant and against it and would have been so for ever had it continued which it was no way able so to take away as that the called might receive the Inheritance the Lord Christ undertook to be the Mediator of that Covenant which was provided as a Remedy against these Evils For herein he undertook to answer for and expiate all those Sins Whereas therefore Expiation of Sin is to be made by an Act towards God with whom alone Atonement is to be made so as that they may be pardoned the Mediation of Christ here intended is that whereby suffering death in our stead in the behalf of all that are called he made Atonement for Sin But moreover God had a further design herein He would not only free them that are called from that death which they deserved by their Sins against the first Covenant but give them also a Right and Title unto an Eternal Inheritance that is of Grace and Glory Wherefore the Procurement hereof also depends on the Mediation of Christ. For by his Obedience unto God in the discharge thereof he purchased for them this Inheritance and bequeathed it unto them as the Mediator of the New Testament The Provision of this Mediator of the New Testament is the greatest Effect of the infinite Wisdom Love and Grace of God This is the Center of his Eternal Counsels In the womb of this one Mercy all others are contained Herein will he be glorified unto Eternity 1 The first Covenant of Works was broken and disannulled because it had no Mediator 2 The Covenant at Sinai had no such Mediator as could expiate Sin Hence 3 Both of them became means of Death and Condemnation 4 God saw that in the making the New Covenant it was necessary to put all things into the hand of a Mediator that it also might not be frustrated 5 This Mediator was not in the first place to preserve us in the state of the New Covenant but to deliver us from the guilt of the breach of the former and the Curse thereon To make provision for this End was the Effect of Infinite Wisdom Seventhly The especial way and means whereby this Effect was wrought by this Mediator was by death Morte obita facta interveniente intercedente by means of death say we Death was the means that whereby the Mediator procured the Effect mentioned That which in the foregoing Verse is ascribed unto the Blood of Christ which he offered as a Priest is here ascribed unto his death as a Mediator For both these really are the same only in the one the thing it self is expressed it was death in the other the manner of it it was by blood in the one what he did and suffered with respect unto the Curse of the first Covenant it was death in the other the ground of his making Expiation for Sin by his death or how it came so to do namely not meerly as it was death or penal but as it was a voluntary Sacrifice or Oblation It was therefore necessary unto the End mentioned that the Mediator of the New Testament should dye not as the High Priests of old dyed a natural death for themselves but as the Sacrifice dyed that was slain and offered for others He was to dye that death which was threatned unto Transgressions against the first Covenant that is death under the Curse of the Law There must therefore be some great Cause and End why this Mediator being the onely begotten of the Father should thus dye This was say the Socinians that he might confirm the Doctrine that he taught He dyed as a Martyr not as a Sacrifice But 1 There was no need that he should dye unto that End For his Doctrine was sufficiently confirmed by the Scriptures of the Old Testament the Evidence of the Presence of God in him and the Miracles which he wrought 2 Notwithstanding their pretence they do not assign the Confirmation of his Doctrine unto his Death but unto his Resurrection from the dead Neither indeed do they allow any gracious Effect unto his death either towards God or men but only make it something necessarily antecedent unto what he did of that kind Nor do they allow that he acted any thing at all towards God on our behalf Whereas the Scripture constantly assigns our Redemption Sanctification and Salvation to the death and blood of Christ. These Persons 1 deny that of it self it hath any influence into them wherefore 2 they say that Christ by his death confirmed the New Covenant but hereby they intend nothing but what they do also in the former or the Confirmation of his Doctrine with an addition of somewhat worse For they would have him to confirm the Promises of God as by him declared and no more as though he were God's Surety to us and not a Surety for us unto God Neither do they assign this unto his Death but unto his Resurrection from the dead But suppose all this and that the death of Christ were in some sense useful and profitable unto these Ends which is all they plead
he dyes he may not dispose of it unto those which by Nature Affinity or other obligations he hath most respect unto Wherefore the foundation of the Apostles arguing from this usage amongst men is firm and stable Of the like nature is his observation that a Testament is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth the nature of the thing it self expounded by constant practice will admit no doubt of it For by what way soever a man disposeth of his Goods so as that it shall take effect whil'st he is alive as by Sale or Gift it is not a Testament nor hath any thing of the nature of a Testament in it For that is only the Will of a man concerning his Goods when he is dead These things being unquestionable we are only to consider whence the Apostle takes his Argument to prove the necessity of the death of Christ as he was the Mediator of the New Testament Now this is not meerly from the signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which yet is of consideration also as hath been declared but whereas he treats principally of the two Covenants it is the Affinity that is between a Solemn Covenant and a Testament that he hath respect unto For he speaks not of the death of Christ meerly as it was death which is all that is required unto a Testament properly so called without any consideration of what nature it is but he speaks of it also as it was a Sacrifice by the effusion of his blood which belongs unto a Covenant and is no way required unto a Testament Whereas therefore the word may signifie either a Covenant or a Testament precisely so called the Apostle hath respect unto both the significations of it And having in these Verses mentioned his death as the death of a Testator which is proper unto a Testament in the 14th Verse and those that follow he insists on his blood as a Sacrifice which is proper unto a Covenant But these things must be more fully explained whereby the difficulty which appears in the whole Context will be removed Unto the confirmation or ratification of a Testament that it may be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sure stable and of force there must be death the death of the Testator But there is no need that this should be by blood the blood of the Testator or any other Unto the consideration of a Covenant blood was required the blood of the Sacrifice and death only consequentially as that which would ensue thereon but there was no need that it should be the blood or death of him that made the Covenant Wherefore the Apostle declaring the necessity of the death of Christ both as to the nature of it that it was really death and as to the manner of it that it was by the effusion of his blood and that from the consideration of the two Covenants the Old and the New Testament and what was required unto them he evinceth it by that which was essential unto them both in a Covenant as such and in a Testament precisely so called That which is most eminent and essential unto a Testament is that it is confirmed and made irrevocable by the death of the Testator And that which is the excellency of a Solemn Covenant whereby it is made firm and stable is that it was confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices as he proves in the instance of the Covenant made at Sinai v. 18 19 20 21 22. Wherefore whatever is excellent in either of these was to be found in the Mediator of the New Testament Take it as a Testament which upon the Bequeathment made therein of the Goods of the Testator unto the Heirs of Promise of Grace and Glory it hath the nature of and he dyed as the Testator whereby the Grant of the Inheritance was made irrevocable unto them Hereunto no more is required but his death without the consideration of the nature of it in the way of a Sacrifice Take it as a Covenant as upon the consideration of the Promises contained in it and the Prescription of Obedience it hath the nature of a Covenant though not of a Covenant strictly so called and so it was to be confirmed with the blood of the Sacrifice of himself which is the Eminency of the Solemn Confirmation of this Covenant And as his death had an Eminency above the death required unto a Testament in that it was by blood and in the Sacrifice of himself which it is no way necessary that the death of a Testator should be yet it fully answered the death of a Testator in that he truly dyed so had it an Eminency above all the ways of the confirmation of the Old Covenant or any other Solemn Covenant whatever in that whereas such a Covenant was to be confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices yet was it not required that it should be the blood of him that made the Covenant as here it was The consideration hereof solves all the appearing difficulties in the nature and manner of the Apostles Argument The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereunto respect is here had is as we have shewed of a large signification and various use And frequently it is taken for a free grant and disposition of things by promise which hath the nature of a Testament And in the Old Covenant there was a free grant and donation of the Inheritance of the Land of Canaan unto the people which belongs unto the nature of a Testament also Moreover both of them a Covenant and a Testament do agree in the general nature of their confirmation the one by blood the other by death Hereon the Apostle in the use of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth diversly argue both unto the nature necessity and use of the death of the Mediator of the New Testament He was to dye in the confirmation of it as it was a Testament he being the Testator of it and he was to offer himself as a Sacrifice in his blood for the establishment of it as it had the nature of a Covenant Wherefore the Apostle doth not argue as some imagine meerly from the signification of the word whereby as they say that in the original is not exactly rendred And those who have from hence troubled themselves and others about the Authority of this Epistle have nothing to thank for it but their own ignorance of the design of the Apostle and the nature of his Argument And it were well if we all were more sensible of our own ignorance and more apt to acknowledge it when we meet with difficulties in the Scripture than for the most part we are Alas how short are our Lines when we come to fathom the depths of it How inextricable difficulties do appear sometimes in passages of it which when God is pleased to teach us are all pleasant and easie These things being premised to clear the scope and nature of the Apostles Argument we proceed unto a brief Exposition of
the words VER XVI For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be the death of the Testator THere are two things in the words 1 A Supposition of a Testament 2 What is required thereunto In the first there is 1 The Note of Inference 2 The Supposition it self The first is the Particle For. This doth not infer a Reason to ensue of what he had before affirmed which is the common use of that Illative but only the Introduction of an Illustration of it from what is the usage of Mankind in such cases on supposition that this Covenant is also a Testament For then there must be the death of the Testator as it is in all Testaments amongst men The Supposition it self is in those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Verb Substantive is wanting where a Testament is so it is by us supplied it may be not necessarily For the Expression of where a Testament is may suppose that the death of the Testator is required unto the making of a Testament which as the Apostle sheweth in the next Verse it is not but only unto its Execution In the case of a Testament namely that it may be executed is the meaning of the words where that is wherever Amongst all sorts of men living according unto the light of Nature and the conduct of Reason the making of Testaments is in use For without it neither can private Industry be encouraged nor publick Peace maintained Wherefore as was before observed the Apostle argueth from the common usage of mankind resolved into the Principles of Reason and Equity 2. What is required unto the Validity of a Testament and that is the death of the Testator And the way of the Introduction of this death unto the validity of a Testament is by being brought in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it enter namely after the ratifying of the Testament to make it of force or to give it operation The Testament is made by a living man but whil'st he lives it is dead or of no use That it may operate and be effectual death must be brought into the account This death must be the death of the Testator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is he who disposeth of things who hath right so to do and actually doth it This in a Testament is the Testator And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have in the Greek the same respect unto one another as Testamentum and Testator in the Latine Wherefore if the New Covenant hath the nature of a Testament it must have a Testator and that Testator must dye before it can be of force and efficacy which is what was to be proved This is further confirmed VER XVII For a Testament is of force after men are dead otherwise it is of no strength at all whilest the Testator liveth IT is not of the making and constitution of a Testament but of the force and execution of it that he speaks And in these words he gives a Reason of the necessity of the death of the Testator thereunto And this is because the validity and efficacy of the Testament depends solely thereon And this reason he introduceth by the Conjunction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For. A Testament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of force say we that is firm stable not to be disannull'd For if it be but a mans Testament yet if it be confirmed no man disannulleth or addeth thereunto Gal. 3. 15. It is ratified made unalterable so as that it must be executed according unto the mind of the Testator And it is so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 among them that are dead after men are dead that is those who make the Testament For it is opposed unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whil'st the Testator liveth For Testaments are the Wills of dead men Living men have no Heirs And this sense is declared in those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quandoquidem quoniam seeing that otherwise say we without this accession unto the making of a Testament As yet it prevaileth not it is not of force for the actual distribution of the Inheritance or the Goods of the Testator Two things must yet farther be declared 1 What are the Grounds or general Reasons of this Assertion 2 Where lies the force of the Argument from it 1. The force of a Testament depends on the death of the Testator or the death of the Testator is required to make it effectual for these two Reasons 1 Because a Testament is no Act or Deed of a man whereby he presently and in the making of it conveys gives or grants any part of his possession unto another or others so as that it should immediately thereon cease to be his own and become the propriety of those others all such Instruments of Contract Bargain Sale or Deeds of Gift are of another nature they are not Testaments A Testament is only the signification of the Will of a man as unto what he will have done with his Goods after his death Wherefore unto the force and execution of it his death is necessary 2 A Testament that is only so is alterable at the pleasure of him that makes it whil'st he is alive Wherefore it can be of no force whil'st he is so for that he may change it or disannul it when he pleaseth The foundation therefore of the Apostles Argument from this usage amongst men is firm and stable 2. Whereas the Apostle argueth from the Proportion and Similitude that is between this New Testament or Covenant and the Testaments of men we may consider what are the things wherein that Similitude doth consist and shew also wherein there is a dissimilitude whereunto his Reasonings are not to be extended For so it is in all comparisons the Comparates are not alike in all things especially where things spiritual and temporal are compared together So was it also in all the Types of old Every person or every thing that was a Type of Christ were not so in all things in all that they were And therefore it requires both wisdom and diligence to distinguish in what they were so and in what they were not that no false Inferences or Conclusions be made from them So is it in all Comparisons and therefore in the present instance we must consider wherein the things compared do agree and wherein they differ 1. They agree principally in the death of the Testator This alone makes a Testament among men effectual and irrevocable So is it in this New Testament It was confirmed and ratified by the death of the Testator Jesus Christ and otherwise could not have been of force This is the fundamental agreement between them which therefore alone the Apostle expresly insisteth on although there are other things which necessarily accompany it as essential unto every Testament as 2. In every Testament amongst men there are Goods disposed and bequeathed unto Heirs or Legatees which were the Property of the
death of the Testator VER XVIII XIX XX XXI XXII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unde hence Therefore Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propter hoc quia propter For this Cause And hence it is Arab. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was confirmed dedicatum fuit was dedicated consecrated separated unto sacred use 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. When the whole Command was enjoyned Vul. Lat. lecto omni mandato legis The command of the Law being read taking 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the same Arias exposito secundum legem Most cum recitasset having repeated recited namely out of the Book 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Syriack reads only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of an Heifer as the Arabick omits 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 also of Goats it may be in compliance with the story in Moses without cause as we shall see 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is omitted in the Syriack Whereupon neither the first Testament was dedicated without Blood For when Moses had spoken every Precept to all the People according to the Law he took the blood of Calves and of Goats with water and Scarlet wool and Hyssop and sprinkled both the Book and all the People Saying This is the Blood of the Testament which God hath enjoyned unto you Moreover he sprinkled with Blood both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministry And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood and without shedding of blood is no Remission What we have before observed is fully confirmed in this Discourse namely that the Apostle intended not to argue absolutely and precisely from the Name and Nature of a Testament properly so called and the use of it among men For he makes use of these things no further but as unto what such a Testament hath in common with a Solemn Covenant which is that they are both confirmed and ratified by death Wherefore it was necessary that the new Testament as it was a Testament should be confirmed by death and as it had the Nature of a Covenant it was to be so by such a Death as was accompanyed by blood-shedding The former was proved before from the general Nature and Notion of a Testament the latter is here proved at large from the way and manner whereby the first Covenant was confirmed or dedicated But the Apostle in this Discourse doth not intend merely to prove that the first Covenant was dedicated with Blood which might have been dispatched in a very few words But he declares moreover in general what was the use of blood in Sacrifices on all occasions under the Law whereby he demonstrates the Use and Efficacy of the blood of Christ as unto all the Ends of the new Covenant And the Ends of the use of Blood under the old Testament he declares to have been two namely Purification and Pardon both which are comprised in that one of the Expiation of Sin And these things are all of them applyed unto the blood and Sacrifice of Christ in the following verses In the Exposition of this Context we must do three things 1 Consider the Difficulties that are in it 2 Declare the Scope Design and force of the Argument contained in it 3 Explain the particular passages of the whole 1. Sundry Difficulties there are in this Context which arise from hence that the account which the Apostle gives of the Dedication of the first Covenant and of the Tabernacle seems to differ in sundry things from that given by Moses when all things were actually done by him as it is recorded Exod. 24. And they are these that follow 1. That the blood which Moses took was the blood of Calves and Goats whereas there is no mention of any Goats or their blood in the story of Moses 2. That he took Water Scarlet-wool and Hyssop to sprinkle it withal whereas none of them are reported in that story 3. That he sprinkled the Book in Particular which Moses doth not affirm 4. That he sprinkled all the People that is the People indefinitely for all the individuals of them could not be sprinkled 5. There are some Differences in the words which Moses spake in the Dedication of the Covenant as laid down ver 20. 6. That he sprinkled the Tabernacle with blood and all the Vessels of it when at the Time of the Making and Solemn Confirmation of the Covenant the Tabernacle was not Erected nor the Vessels of its Ministry yet made For the Removal of these Difficulties some things must be premised in general and then they shall all of them be considered distinctly 1. This is taken as fixed that the Apostle wrote this Epistle by Divine Inspiration Having evidence here of abundantly satisfactory it is the vainest thing imaginable and that which discovers a frame of Mind disposed to Cavil at things Divine if from the Difficulties of any one Passage we should reflect on the Authority of the whole as some have done on this occasion But I shall say with some confidence he never understood any one Chapter of the Epistle nay nor any one verse of it aright who did or doth question its Divine Original There is nothing Humane in it that savours I mean of humane Infirmity but the whole and every part of it are animated by the Wisdom and Authority of its Author And those who have pretended to be otherwise minded on such slight occasions as that before us have but proclaimed their own want of Experience in things Divine But 2. There is nothing in all that is here affirmed by the Apostle which hath the least appearance of Contradiction unto any thing that is recorded by Moses in the story of these things Yea as I shall shew without the Consideration and Addition of the things here mentioned by the Apostle we cannot aright apprehend nor understand the account that is given by him This will be made evident in the Consideration of the particulars wherein the difference between them is supposed to consist 3. The Apostle doth not take his Account of the things here put together by him from any one place in Moses but gathers up what is declared in the Law in several Places unto various Ends. For as hath been declared he doth not design only to prove the dedication of the Covenant by Blood but to shew also the whole use of blood under the Law as unto Purification and Remission of Sin And this he doth to declare the Vertue and Efficacy of the blood of Christ under the new Testament whereunto he makes an Application of all these things in the verses ensuing Wherefore he gathers into one head sundry things wherein the sprinkling of blood was of use under the Law as they are occasionally expressed in sundry Places And this one observation removes all the difficulties of the Context which all arise from this one supposition that the Apostle gives here an account only of what was done at the
Language which the People understood and commonly spake And a Rule was herein prescribed unto the Church in all Ages if so be the Example of the Wisdom and Care of God towards his Church may be a Rule unto us 3. God never required the Observance of any Rites or Duties of Worship without a previous warranty from his Word The People took not on them they were not obliged unto Obedience with respect unto any positive Institutions until Moses had read unto them every precept out of the Book 4. The writing of this Book was an eminent Priviledge now first granted unto the Church leading unto a more perfect and stable condition then formerly it had enjoyed Hitherto it had lived on Oral Instructions from Traditions and by new immediate Revelations the evident Defects whereof were now removed and a standard of Divine Truth and Instruction set up and fixed among them 3dly There is the Rule whereby Moses proceeded herein or the Warranty he had for what he did According to the Law He read every Precept according to the Law It cannot be the Law in general that the Apostle intends for the greatest part of that Doctrine which is so called was not yet given or written nor doth it in any place contain any Precept unto this purpose Wherefore it is a particular Law Rule or Command that is intended According unto the Ordinance or Appointment of God Such was the Command that God gave unto Moses for the framing of the Tabernacle See thou make all things according to the Pattern shewed thee in the Mount Particularly it seems to be the Agreement between God and the People that Moses should be the Internuntius the Interpreter between them According unto this Rule Order or divine Constitution Moses read all the words from God out of the Book unto the People Or it may be the Law may here be taken for the whole Design of God in giving of the Law so as that according unto the Law is no more but according unto the Soveraign Wisdom and Pleasure of God in giving of the Law with all things that belong unto its Order and Use. And it is Good for us to look for Gods especial warranty for what we undertake to do in his service The second thing in the words is what Moses did immediately and Directly towards the Dedication or Consecration of this Covenant And there are three things to this purpose mentioned 1 What he made use of 2 How he used it 3 With respect unto what and whom 1. The first is expressed in these words He took the Blood of Calves and Goats with water and Scarlet-wool and Hyssop He took the Blood of the Beasts that were offered for Burnt-offerings and Peace-offerings ver 5 6. Unto this End in their slaying he took all their Blood in Basons and made an equal Division of it The one half he sprinkled on the Altar and the other half he sprinkled on the People That which was sprinkled on the Altar was Gods Part and the other was put on the People Both the Mutual stipulation of God and the Congregation in this Covenant and the Equality of it or the Equity of its Terms were denoted hereby And herein lies the principal force of the Apostles Argument in these words Blood was used in the Dedication of the first Covenant This was the Blood of the Beasts offered in Sacrifice unto God Wherefore both Death and Death by blood-sheding was required unto the Confirmation of a Covenant So also therefore must the new Covenant be confirmed but with Blood and a Sacrifice far more precious than they were This Distribution of Blood that half of it was on the Altar and half of it on the People the one to make Attonement the other to purifie or Sanctifie was to teach the two-fold Efficacy of the Blood of Christ in making Attonement for Sin unto our Justification and the purifying of our Natures in Sanctification 2. With this Blood he took the things mentioned with respect unto its Use which was Sprinkling The manner of it was in part declared before The Blood being put into Basons and having water mixed with it to keep it fluid and aspersible He took a bunch or bundle of Hyssop bound up with Scarlet wool and dipping it into the Basons sprinkled the Blood until it was all spent in that Service This Rite or way of Sprinkling was chosen of God as an expressive token or sign of the effectual Communication of the Benefits of the Covenant unto them that were sprinkled Hence the Communication of the Benefits of the Death of Christ unto Sanctification is called the Sprinkling of his Blood 1 Pet. 1. 2. And our Apostle comprizeth all the effects of it unto that end under the name of the blood of Sprinkling chap. 12. 24. And I fear that those who have used the expression with some contempt when applyed by themselves unto the sign of the Communication of the Benefits of the Death of Christ in Baptisme have not observed that Reverence of Holy things that is required of us For this Symbol of Sprinkling was that which God himself chose and appointed as a meet and apt token of the Communication of Covenant-Mercy that is of his Grace in Christ Jesus unto our Souls And The Blood of the Covenant will not benefit or advantage us without an especial and particular Application of it unto our own Souls and Consciences If it be not as well Sprinkled upon us as it was offered unto God it will not avail us The Blood of Christ was not divided as was that of these Sacrifices the one half being on the Altar the other on the People but the Efficacy of the whole produced both these effects yet so as that the one will not profit us without the other We shall have no Benefit of the Attonement made at the Altar unless we have its efficacy on our own Souls unto their Purification And this we cannot have unless it be sprinkled on us unless particular Application be made of it unto us by the Holy Ghost in and by an especial Act of Faith in our selves 3. The Object of this Act of Sprinkling was the Book it self and all the People The same Blood was on the Book wherein the Covenant was recorded and the People that entred into it But whereas this Sprinkling was for purifying and purging it may be enquired Unto what end the Book it self was sprinkled which was holy and undefiled I Answer There were two things necessary unto the Dedication of the Covenant with all that belonged unto it 1 Attonement 2 Purification and in both these respects it was necessary that the Book it self should be sprinkled 1 As we observed before it was sprinkled as it lay upon the Altar where Attonement was made And this was plainly to signifie that Attonement was to be made by blood for sins committed against that book or the Law contained in it Without this that book would have
been unto the People like that given to Ezekiel that was written within and without and there was written therein Lamentations and Mourning and Woe Chap. 2. 10. Nothing but Curse and Death could they expect from it But the Sprinkling of it with blood as it lay upon the Altar was a Testimony and Assurance that Attonement should be made by blood for the sins against it which was the Life of the things 2 The Book in it self was Pure and Holy and so are all Gods Institutions but unto us every thing is unclean that is not sprinkled with the blood of Christ. So afterwards the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it were purified every year with blood because of the Uncleannesses of the People in their Transgressions Levit. 16. Wherefore on both these accounts it was necessary that the Book it self should be sprinkled The blood thus sprinkled was mingled with water The natural Reason of it was as we observed to keep it fluid and aspersible But there was a Mystery in it also That the blood of Christ was typified by this blood of the Sacrifices used in the Dedication of the Old Covenant it is the Apostle's Design to declare And it is probable that this mixture of it with water might represent that Blood and Water which came out of his side when it was pierced For the Mystery thereof was very great Hence that Apostle which saw it and bare Record of it in particular Joh. 19. 34 35. affirms likewise that he came by water and blood and not by blood only 1 Epist. chap. 5. ver 6. He came not only to make Attonement for us with his blood that we might be justifyed but to sprinkle us with the efficacy of his blood in the communication of the Spirit of Sanctification compared unto water For the Sprinkler it self composed of Scarlet wool and Hyssop I doubt not but that the Humane Nature of Christ whereby and through which all Grace is communicated unto us for of his fulness we receive and Grace for Grace was signified by it But the Analogie and Similitude between them are not so evident as they are with respect unto some other Types The Hyssop was an humble Plant the meanest of them yet of a sweet savour 1. Kings 4. 33. So was the Lord Christ amongst men in the days of his flesh in comparison of the tall Cedars of the Earth Hence was his complaint that he was as a worm and no man a reproach of men and despised of the People Psal. 22. 6. And the Scarlet wool might represent him as red in the blood of his Sacrifice But I will not press these things of whose Interpretation we have not a certain Rule Secondly The principal Truth asserted is confirmed by what Moses said as well as what he did VER XX. Saying This is the Blood of the Testament which God hath enjoyned unto you The Difference between the words of Moses and the Repetition of them by the Apostle is not material as unto the sense of them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold in Moses is rendred by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This both demonstrative Notes of the same thing For in pronouncing of the words Moses shewed the Blood unto the People And so Behold the Blood is all one as if he had said this is the Blood The making of the Covenant in the words of Moses is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath cut divided solemnly made This the Apostle renders by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath enjoyned or commanded you And this he doth partly to signify the Foundation of the People's Acceptance of that Covenant which was the Authority of God enjoyning them or requiring them so to do partly to intimate the nature of the Covenant it self which consisted in Precepts and Injunctions principally and not absolutely in Promises as the New Covenant doth The last words of Moses Concerning all these words the Apostle omits For he includes the sense of them in that word which the Lord commanded you For he hath respect therein both unto the words themselves written in the Book which were Precepts and Injunctions as also the command of God for the Acceptance of the Covenant That which Moses said is This is the blood of the Testament Hence the Apostle proves that Death and the shedding of blood therein was necessary unto the consecration and establishment of the first Testament For so Moses expresly affirms in the Dedication of it This is the blood of the Covenant without which it could not have been a firm Covenant between God and the People Not I confess from the nature of a Covenant in general for a Covenant may be solemnly established without Death or Blood but from the especial end of that Covenant which in the confirmation of it was to prefigure the confirmation of that new Covenant which could not be established but with the blood of a Sacrifice And this adds both force and evidence unto the Apostles Argument For he proves the Necessity of the Death and Blood-shedding or Sacrifice of Christ in the confirmation of the New Covenant from hence that the Old Covenant which in the Dedication of it was prefigurative hereof was not confirmed without Blood Wherefore whereas God had solemnly promised to make a new Covenant with the Church and that different from or not according unto the Old which he had proved in the foregoing Chapter it follows unavoidably that it was to be confirmed with the Blood of the Mediator for by the blood of Beasts it could not be which is that Truth wherein he did instruct them And nothing was more cogent to take off the scandal of the Cross and of the sufferings of Christ. For the Enuntiation it self This is the blood of the Covenant it is figurative and Sacramental The Covenant had no blood of its own but the blood of the Sacrifices is called the blood of the Covenant because the Covenant was dedicated and established by it Neither was the Covenant really established by it For it was the Truth of God on the one hand and the stability of the People in their professed Obedience on the other that the establishment of the Covenant depended on But this blood was a confirmatory sign of it a Token between God and the People of their mutual engagements in that Covenant So the Paschal Lamb was called Gods Pass-over because it was a sign and token of Gods passing over the houses of the Israelites when he destroyed the Aegyptians Exod. 12. 11 21. With reference it was unto those Sacramental Expressions which the Church under the Old Testament was accustomed unto that our Lord Jesus Christ in the Institution of the Sacrament of the Supper called the Bread and the Wine whose use he appointed therein by the names of his Body and Blood and any other Interpretation of the words wholly overthrows the Nature of that holy Ordinance Wherefore this Blood was a confirmatory Sign of the Covenant And it was
it was the Rule of the Government of the Nation And in this sense for such sins as were not Politically to be spared no Sacrifice was allowed 2 That real Spiritual Forgiveness and gracious Acceptance with himself was to be obtained alone by that which was signified by this blood which was the Sacrifice of Christ himself And whereas the sins of the People were of various kinds there were particular Sacrifices instituted to answer that variety This variety of Sacrifices with respect unto the various sorts or kinds of sins for which they were to make Attonement I have elsewhere discussed and explained Their Institution and Order is recorded Levit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. And if any Person neglected that especial Sacrifice which was appointed to make Attonement for his especial Sin he was left under the sentence of the Law Politically and Spiritually there was no Remission Yea also there might be there were sins that could not be reduced directly unto any of those for whose Remission sacrifices were directed in particular Wherefore God graciously provided against the Distress or Ruine of the Church on either of these Accounts For whether the People had fallen under the neglect of any of those especial ways of Attonement or had contracted the Guilt of such sins as they knew not how to reduce unto any sort of them that were to be expiated he had gratiously prepared the great Anniversary Sacrifice wherein publick Attonement was made for all the Sins Trangressions and Iniquities of the whole People of what sort soever they were Levit. 16. 21. But in the whole of his Ordinances he established the Rule that without shedding of blood was no Remission There seems to be an Exception in the case of him who was so poor that he could not provide the meanest offering of blood for a Sin-offering For he was allowed by the Law to offer the Tenth part of an Ephah of fine flower for his Sin and it was forgiven him Levit. 5. 11 12 13. Wherefore the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 almost may be here again repeated because of this single case But the Apostle hath respect unto the general Rule of the Law And this exception was not an ordinary Constitution but depended on the Impossibility of the thing it self whereunto it made a gracious Condescension And this Necessity oft-times of it self without any Constitution suspends a positive Law and gives a Dispensation unto the infringers of it So was it in the case of David when he eat of the Shew-bread in his hunger and as to works of Mercy on the Sabbath day which Instances are given by our Saviour himself Wherefore the particular exception on this consideration did rather strengthen then invalidate the general Rule of the Law Besides the nearest approach was made unto it that might be For fine flower is the best of the bread whereby Mans Life is sustained and in the Offering of it the Offerer testified that by his sin he had forfeited his own Life and all whereby it was sustained which was the meaning of the Offering of Blood The Expositors of the Roman Church do here greatly perplex themselves to secure the Sacrifice of their Mass from this destroying sentence of the Apostle For a Sacrifice they would have it to be and that for the Remission of the sins of the living and the dead Yet they say it is an unbloody Sacrifice For if there be any blood shed in it it is the Blood of Christ and then he is Crucified by them afresh every day as indeed in some sense he is though they cannot shed his Blood If it be unbloody the Rule of the Apostle is that it is no way available for the Remission of sins Those that are sober have no way to deliver themselves but by denying the Mass to be a proper Sacrifice for the Remission of Sins which is done expresly by Estius upon the place But this is contrary unto the direct assertions contained in the Mass it self and razeth the very Foundation of it Now if God gave them so much Light under the Old Testament as that they should know believe and profess that without shedding of Blood is no Remission how great is the Darkness of Men under the New Testament who look seek or endeavour any other way after the pardon of sin but only by the Blood of Christ. 2. This is the great Demonstration of the Demerit of sin of the Holiness Righteousness and Grace of God For such was the Nature and Demerit of Sin such was the Righteousness of God with respect unto it that without shedding of Blood it could not be pardoned They are strangers unto the one and the other who please themselves with other imaginations And what Blood must this be That the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away Sin was utterly impossible as our Apostle declares It must be the Blood of the Son of God Rom. 3 24 25. Act. 20. 28. And herein were glorified both the Love and Grace of God in that he spared not his only Son but gave him up to be a bloody Sacrifice in his Death for us all VER XXIII In the following Verses unto the End of the Chapter the Apostle makes an Application of all that he had discoursed concerning the Services and Sacrifices of the Tabernacle with their use and efficacy on the one hand and the Sacrifice of Christ its nature use and efficacy on the other unto his present Argument Now this was to demonstrate the Excellency Dignity and Vertue of the Priesthood of Christ and the Sacrifice of himself that he offered thereby as he was the Mediator of the New Covenant And he doth it in the way of Comparison as unto what there was of Similitude between them and of opposition as unto what was singular in the Person and Priesthood of Christ wherein they had no share declaring on both accounts the incomparable Excellency of him and his Sacrifice above the Priests of the Law and theirs And hereon he concludes his whole Discourse with an Elegant comparison and opposition between the Law and the Gospel wherein he comprizeth in few words the substance of them both as unto their effects on the Souls of men That wherein in general there was a Similitude in these things is expressed Verse 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no Difference of Importance in the Translation of these words by any Interpreters of Reputation and singly they have been all of them before spoken unto Only the Syriack renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Similitudes not unaptly VER XXIII It was therefore necessary that the Patterns of things in the Heavens should be purified with these but the Heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices then these An Entrance is made in these words into the comparison intended For as unto both sorts of Sacrifices compared it is here granted in general that they purged the things whereunto they were applyed But there is a
Place made with hands but into Heaven it self So the High Priest had an entrance also yet not into Heaven but into that other Holy Place But in this verse there is an opposition in the Comparison that hath no Foundation in any similitude between them and that is absolutely denyed of Christ which belonged essentially unto the Discharge of the Office of the High Priest of Old Many things ensued on the Weakness and Imperfection of the Types which would not allow that there should be a perfect compleat Resemblance in them of the Substance it self that all things between them exactly should answer unto One another Hence they did at best but obscurely represent the good things to come and in some things it was not possible but there should be a great discrepancy between them The Assertion in these Words proceeds on a Supposition of the Duty of the High Priest which had that Reason for it as that it was absolutely necessary that our High Priest should not do after the same manner The High Priest ended not his work of offering Sacrifices by his entrance into the Holy Place with the Blood of it but he was to repeat the same Sacrifice again every year This therefore in correspondence with this Type might be expected from Christ also namely that whereas he offered himself unto God through the Eternal Spirit and afterwards entred into the Holy Place or Heaven it self he should offer himself again and so have another entrance into the Presence of God This the Apostle denies him to have done and in the next verse gives a demonstration proving it was impossible he should so do And hereof he gives the Reason both in the remaining verses of this Chapter and the beginning of the next The Repetition of the annual Sacrifices under the Law was mainly from hence because they were not able perfectly to effect that which they did signifie But the One Sacrifice of Christ did at once perfectly accomplish what they did represent Herein therefore of necessity there was to be a difference a Dissimilitude an Opposition between what those High Priests did as unto the Repetition of Sacrifices and what was done by our High Priest which is expressed in this verse The Introduction of the Apostles Assertion is by the disjunctive Negative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor yet It answers the Negative in the first part of the preceding verse He entred not into the Holy Place made with hands as the High Priest nor yet to do what the High Priest did afterwards In the words themselves there are two things 1 What is denyed of the Lord Christ. 2 The Limitation of that Denial unto the other part of the Comparison as unto what the High Priest did 1. It is denied of him that he did thus enter into Heaven that he should offer himself often It doth not follow saith the Apostle that because as an High Priest he entred into Heaven as the High Priests of the Law entred into the Holy Place made with hands that he should therefore offer himself often as that High Priest offered every year It was not required of him there was no need of it for the Reasons mentioned it was impossible he should For this offering of himself was not his Appearance in the Presence of God but the One Sacrifice of himself by death as the Apostle declares in the next verse That he should so offer himself often more than once was needless from the Perfection of that one Offering By one Offering he hath for ever perfected them that were Sanctified And impossible from the Condition of his Person he could not dye often What remains for the Exposition of these words will be declared in the removal of those false Glosses and wrestings of them whereby some endeavour to pervert them The Socinians plead from hence that the Sacrifice of Christ or his offering of himself is the same with his Appearance in Heaven and the Presentation of himself in the Presence of God and they do it out of Hatred unto the Attonement made by his Blood For say they it is here compared unto the entrance of the High Priest into the Holy Place every year which was only an Appearance in the Presence of God Answ. 1. There is no such Comparison intended in the words The Apostle mentioning the entrance of the High Priest with Blood into the Holy Place intends only to evince the Imperfection of that Service in that after he had done so he was again to offer renewed Sacrifices every year a sufficient Evidence that those Sacrifices could never make them perfect who came unto God by them With Christ it was not so as the Apostle declares So that there is not herein a Comparison between the things themselves but an Opposition between their Effects 2. It is granted that the entrance of the High Priest into the Holy Place belonged unto the Complement or Perfection of his Service in the expiatory Sacrifice But the Sacrifice it self did not consist therein So likewise did the entrance of Christ into Heaven belong unto the Perfection of the Effects and Efficacy of his Sacrifice as unto the way of its Application unto the Church So far there is a Comparison in the words and no further 3. That the Sacrifice of Christ or his offering himself once for all once and not often is the same with his continual Presentation of himself in the Presence of God is both false in it self and contrary to the express design of the Apostle For 1 It is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a slain or bloody Sacrifice whereof he treats as he expresly calls it ver 25 26. But there is no shedding of blood in the Appearance of Christ in Heaven nor according to these men any such thing appertaining unto his Nature 2 These things are distinguished in the Scripture from their different Natures and Effects 1 Joh. 2. 1 2. 3 His Sacrifice or the offering of himself is so affirmed to be one as to consist in One individual Act. It is not only said that it was one Offering but that it was once only offered ver 26 28. This is no way reconcileable unto his continual Appearance in the presence of God 4 His Offering is mentioned by the Apostle as that which was then past and no more to be repeated He hath by one Offering perfected them that are Sanctified 5 His Oblation was accompanied with and inseparable from suffering So he declares in the next verse proving that he could not often offer himself because he could not often suffer But his Presentation of himself in Heaven is not only inconsistent with actual Suffering but also with any obnoxiousness thereunto It belongs unto his state of Exaltation and Glory 6 The time of the offering himself is limited unto the End of the World now once in the end of the World in opposition unto the Season that passed before denoting a certain determinate Season in the dispensation of times of which
consequents of it Hereof he gives an illustration by comparing it unto what is of absolute and unavoidable necessity so as that it cannot otherwise be namely the death of all the individuals of mankind by the decretory sentence of God As they must dye every one and every one but once so Christ was to dye to suffer to offer himself and that but once The instances of those who died not after the manner of other men as Enoch and Elias or those who having died once were raised from the dead and died again as Lazarus give no difficulty herein They are instances of exemption from the common Rule by meer acts of Divine Sovereignty But the Apostle argues from the general Rule and Constitutions and thereon alone the force of his comparisons doth depend and they are not weakned by such exemptions As this is the certain unalterable law of Humane condition that every man must dye once and but once as unto this mortal life so Christ was once and but once offered But there is more in the words and design of the Apostle than a bare Similitude and illustration of what he treats of though Expositors own it not He doth not only illustrate his former Assertion by a fit comparison but gives the Reason of the one offering of Christ from what it was necessary for and designed unto For that he introduceth a Reason of his former Assertion the Causal connexion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth demonstrate Especially as it is joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in quantum inasmuch as in which sense he constantly useth that expression chap. 3. 3. chap. 7. 20. chap. 8. 6. And in as much as it was so with mankind it was necessary that Christ should suffer once for the expiation of Sin and the Salvation of Sinners How was it with mankind in this matter On the account of sin they were all subject unto the Law and the curse thereof Hereof there were two parts 1 Temporal Death to be undergone penally on the sentence of God 2 Eternal judgment wherein they were to perish for evermore In these things consist the effects of sin and the curse of the Law And they were due unto all men unavoidably to be inficted on them by the judgment and sentence of God It is appointed decreed determined of God that men sinful men shall once die and after that come to judgment for their Sins This is the sense the sentence the substance of the Law Under this Sentence they must all perish eternally if not Divinely relieved But inasmuch as it was thus with them the one offering of Christ once offered is prepared for their Relief and deliverance And the relief is in the infinite Wisdom of God eminently proportionate unto the evil the remedy unto the disease For 1. As man was to dye once legally and penally for sin by the sentence of the Law and no more So Christ died suffered and offered once and no more to bear Sin to expiate it and thereby to take away death so far as it was penal 2. As after death men must appear again the second time unto judgement to undergo condemnation thereon so after his once offering to take away Sin and Death Christ shall appear the second time to free us from judgement and to bestow on us eternal Salvation In this interpretation of the words I do not exclude the use of the comparison nor the design of the Apostle to illustrate the one offering of Christ once offered by the certainty of the death of men once onely for these things do illustrate one another as so compared But withal I judge there is more in them than a meer comparison between things no way related one to another but onely have some mutual resemblance in that they fall out but once Yea there seems not to be much light nor any thing of Argument in a comparison so arbitrarily framed But consider these things in their mutual Relation and opposition one unto the other which are the same with that of the Law and the Gospel and there is much of light and argument in the comparing of them together For whereas the end of the Death Suffering and Offering of Christ was to take away and remove the punishment due unto Sin which consisted in this that men should once die and but once and afterwards come to judgment and condemnation according to the sentence of the Law And it was convenient unto Divine Wisdom that Christ for that end should Dye Suffer Offer once only and afterwards bring them for whom he died unto Salvation And this is the proper sense of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in quantum which Interpreters know not what to make of in this place but endeavour variously to change and alter Some pretend that some Copies read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they suppose came from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the onely Reason why the word is not liked is because the sense is not understood Take the mind of the Apostle aright and his expression is proper unto his purpose Wherefore there is in these verses an entire opposition and comparison between the Law and the Gospel the Curse due to Sin and the Redemption that is by Christ Jesus And we may observe That God hath eminently suited our Relief the means and causes of our spiritual Deliverance unto our Misery the means and causes of it as that his own Wisdom and Grace may be exalted and our faith established That which is here summarily represented by our Apostle in this Elegant Antithesis he declares at large Rom. 5. from ver 12. to the end of the Chapter But we proceed with the interpretation of the words In the first part of the Antithesis and comparison ver 27. there are three things asserted 1 The Death of men 2 The judgment that ensues and 3. The cause of them both The last is first to be explained It is Appointed Determined Enacted statutum est It is so by him who hath a Sovereign Power and Authority in and over these things and hath the force of an unalterable Law which none can transgress God himself hath thus appointed it none else can determine and dispose of these things And the word equally respects both parts of the Assertion Death and Judgment They are both equally from the constitution of God which is the cause of them both The Socinians do so divide these things that one of them namely Death they would have to be natural and the other or judgment from the constitution of God which is not to interpret but to contradict the words Yea death is that which in the first place and directly is affirmed to be the effect of this Divine Constitution being spoken of as it is Penal by the curse of the Law for sin and judgment falls under the same constitution as consequential thereunto But if death as they plead be meerly and only natural they
wisdom goodness and Grace The Subject spoken of is the offering of Christ. But it is here mentioned passively he was offered Most frequently it is expressed by his offering of himself the sacrifice he offered of himself For as the vertue of his offering depends principally on the dignity of his Person so his humane Soul his Mind Will and Affections with the fulness of the Graces of the Spirit resident and acting in them did concur unto the efficacy of his Offering and were necessary to render it an Act of Obedience a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God Ephes. 5. 2. Yea hereon principally depended his own Glory which arose not meerly from his suffering but from his obedience therein Phil. 2. 7 8. Wherefore he is most frequently said to offer himself 1. Because of the virtue communicated unto his offering by the Dignity of his Person 2. Because he was the only Priest that did offer 3. Because his Obedience therein was so acceptable unto God 4. Because this expresseth his love unto the Church he loved it and gave himself for it But as himself offered so his offering was himself His whole entire humane nature was that which was offered Hence it is thus passively expressed Christ was offered that is he was not only the Priest who offered but the Sacrifice that was offered Both were necessary that Christ should offer and that Christ should be offered And the Reason why it is here so expressed is because his offering is spoken of as it was by death and suffering For having affirmed that if he must often offer he must often suffer and compared his offering unto the once dying of men penally it is plain that the offering intended is in and by suffering Christ was offered is the same with Christ suffered Christ dyed And this expression is utterly irreconcileable unto the Socinian notion of the Oblation of Christ. For they would have it to consist in the presentation of himself in Heaven eternally free from and above all sufferings which cannot be the sense of this expression Christ was offered The circumstance of his being thus offered is that it was once only This joyned as it is here with a word in the preter tense can signify nothing but an action or passion then past and determin'd It is not any present continued action such as is the presentation of himself in heaven that can be signified hereby 3. The end of Christs being thus once offered and which his one offering did perfectly effect was to bear the sins of many There is an Antithesis between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of many and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto men in the verse foregoing Men expressed indefinitely in that necessary proposition intends all men universally Nor as we have shewed is there any exception against the Rule by a few instances of Exemption by the interposition of Divine Soveraignty But the relief which is granted by Christ though it be unto men indefinitely yet it extends not to all universally but to many of them only That it doth not so extend unto all eventually is confessed And this expression is declarative of the intention of God or of Christ himself in his offering See Ephes. 5. 25 26. He was thus offered for those many to bear their sins as we render the words It is variously translated as we have seen before and various senses are sought after by Expositors Grotius wholly follows the Socinians in their endeavours to pervert the sense of this word It is not from any difficulty in the word but from mens hatred unto the Truth that they put themselves on such endeavours And this whole attempt lies in finding out one or two places where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to take away For the various signification of a word used absolutely in any other place is sufficient for these men to confute its necessary signification in any context But the matter is plain in it self Christ did bear sin or take it away as he was offered as he was a Sacrifice for it This is here expresly affirmed He was offered to bear the sins of many This he did as the Sacrifices did of old as unto their Typical use and efficacy A supposition hereof is the sole foundation of the whole Discourse of the Apostle But they bare sin or took away sin not to contend about the meer signification of the word no otherwise but by the imputation of the sin unto the Beast that was Sacrificed whereon it was slain that attonement might be made with its blood This I have before sufficiently proved So Christ bare the sins of many and so the signification of this word is determined and limited by the Apostle Peter by whom alone it is used on the same occasion 1 Epist. 2. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who himself bare our sins in his own body on the Tree That place compared with this doth utterly evert the Socinian fiction of the Oblation of Christ in Heaven He was offered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bear the sins of many When did he do it How did he do it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He bare our sin in his own body on the tree Wherefore then he offered himself for them And this he did in his suffering Moreover where-ever in the Old Testament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is translated by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the LXX as Numb 14. 33. Isai. 53. 12. or by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with reference unto Sin it constantly signifies to bear the punishment of it Yea it doth so when with respect unto the Event it is rendred by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it is Levit. 10. 17. And the proper signification of the word is to be taken from the declaration of the thing signified by it He shall bear their iniquities Isa. 53. 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bear it as a burden upon him He was offered once so as that he suffered therein As he suffered he bare our iniquities and as he was offered he made attonement for them And this is not opposed unto the appearance of men before God at the last day but unto their death which they were once to undergo Wherefore The ground of the Expiation of Sin by the offering of Christ is this that therein he bare the Guilt and Punishment due unto it Upon this offering of Christ the Apostle supposeth what he had before declared namely that he entred into heaven to appear in the presence of God for us And hereon he declares what is the end of all this dispensation of Gods Grace Unto them that look for him he shall appear the second time without sin unto Salvation And he shews 1 What de facto Christ shall yet do He shall appear 2 To whom he shall so appear Unto them that look for him 3 In what manner Without sin 4 Unto what end Unto Salvation 5 In what order the second time The last thing mentioned is
God the Father did order things towards Jesus Christ that he should have a Nature wherein he might be free and able to yield Obedience unto the Will of God with an intimation of the quality of it in having Ears to hear which belong only unto a Body This Sense the Apostle expresseth in more plain terms now after the accomplishment of what before was only declared in Prophesie and thereby the Veil which was upon Divine Revelations under the Old Testament is taken away There is therefore nothing remaining but that we give an Exposition of these words of the Apostle as they contain the sense of the Holy Ghost in the Psalm And two things we must enquire into 1. What is meant by this body 2. How God prepared it 1. A Body is here a Synecdochical expression of the Humane nature of Christ. So is the flesh taken where he is said to be made flesh and the Flesh and Blood whereof he was partaker For the general end of his having this Body was that he might therein and thereby yield Obedience or do the Will of God And the especial end of it was that he might have what to offer in Sacrifice unto God But neither of these can be confined unto his Body alone For it is the Soul the other essential part of Humane Nature that is the principle of Obedience Nor was the Body of Christ alone Offered in Sacrifice unto God He made his Soul an Offering for Sin Isa. 53. 10. which was Typified by the Life that was in the Blood of the Sacrifice Wherefore it is said that he offered himself unto God Chap. 9. 14. Ephes. 5. 2. That is his whole entire Humane Nature Soul and Body in their Substance in all their Faculties and Powers But the Apostle both here and ver 10. mentions only the Body it self for the reasons ensuing 1. To manifest that this Offering of Christ was to be by Death as was that of the Sacrifices of Old and this the Body alone was subject unto 2. Because as the Covenant was to be confirmed by this Offering it was to be by Blood which is contained in the Body alone and the separation of it from the Body carries the Life along with it 3. To testifie that his Sacrifice was visible and substantial not an outward appearance of things as some have fancied but such as truly answered the real Bloody Sacrifices of the Law 4. To shew the Alliance and Cognation between him that Sanctifieth by his Offering and them that are Sanctified thereby Or that because the Children were partakers of Flesh and Blood he also took part of the same that he might tast of Death for them For these and the like reasons doth the Apostle mention the Humane Nature of Christ under the name of a Body only as also to comply with the Figurative Expression of it in the Psalm And they do what lies in them to overthrow the principal Foundation of the Faith of the Church who would wrest these words unto a new Aetherial Body given him after his Ascension as do the Socinians 2. Concerning this Body it is affirmed that God prepared it for him Thou hast prepared for me that is God hath done it even God the Father For unto him are those words spoken I come to do thy will O God a Body hast thou prepared me The coming of Christ the Son of God into the World his coming in the Flesh by the assuming of our Nature was the effect of the mutual Counsel of the Father and the Son The Father proposeth to him what was his Will what was his design what he would have done This proposal is here repeated as unto what was Negative in it which includes the Opposite Positive Sacrifice and Burnt Offerings thou wouldst not have but that which he would was the Obedience of the Son unto his Will This Proposal the Son closeth withal Lo saith he I come But all things being Originally in the Hand of the Father the Provision of things necessary unto the fulfilling of the Will of God is left unto him Among those the principal was that the Son should have a Body prepared for him that so he might have somewhat of his own to offer Wherefore the preparation of it is in a peculiar manner assigned unto the Father a Body hast thou prepared me And we may observe that 1. The Supream contrivance of the Salvation of the Church is in a peculiar manner ascribed unto the person of the Father His Will his Grace his Wisdom his good Pleasure the purpose that he purposed in himself his Love his sending of his Son are every where proposed as the eternal springs of all Acts of Power Grace and Goodness tending unto the Salvation of the Church And therefore doth the Lord Christ on all occasions declare that he came to do his Will to seek his Glory to make known his Name that the praise of his Grace might be exalted And we through Christ do believe in God even the Father when we assign unto him the Glory of all the Holy Properties of his Nature as acting Originally in the contrivance and for the effecting of our Salvation 2. The Furniture of the Lord Christ though he were the Son and in his Divine person the Lord of all unto the discharge of his work of Mediation was the peculiar Act of the Father He prepared him a Body he anointed him with the Spirit it pleased him that all fulness should dwell in him From him he received all Grace Power Consolation Although the Humane Nature was the Nature of the Son of God not of the Father a Body prepared for him not for the Father yet was it the Father who prepared that Nature who filled it with Grace who strengthened acted and supported it in its whole course of Obedience 3. Whatever God designes appoints and calls any unto he will provide for them all that is needful unto the Duties of Obedience whereunto they are so appointed and called As he prepared a Body for Christ so he will provide Gifts Abilities and Faculties suitable unto their work for those whom he calleth unto it Others must provide as well as they can for themselves But we must yet enquire more particularly into the nature of this preparation of the Body of Christ here ascribed unto the Father And it may be considered two ways 1. In the Designation and Contrivance of it So preparation is sometimes used for Predestination or the Resolution for the effecting any thing that is future in its proper season Isa. 30. 33. Matt. 20. 23. Rom. 9. 23. 1 Cor. 2. 9. In this sense of the word God had prepared a Body for Christ he had in the Eternal Counsel of his Will determined that he should have it in the appointed time So he was Forc-ordained before the Foundation of the World but was manifest in these last times for us 1 Pet. 1. 20. 2. In the actual effecting ordering and creating of it
Redemption and for ever perfected them that are sanctified Wherefore nothing remains for his Intercession but the Application of the fruits of his Oblation unto all them for whom he offered himself in sacrifice according as their conditions and occasions do require Wherefore 8. The safest Conception and Apprehension that we can have of the Intercession of Christ as to the manner of it is his continual Appearance for us in the Presence of God by vertue of his Office as the High Priest over the house of God representing the efficacy of his Oblation accompanied with tender Care Love and Desires for the welfare supply deliverance and Salvation of the Church Three things therefore concurre hereunto 1. The Presentation of his Person before the Throne of God on our behalf chap. 9. 24. This renders it sacerdotal His Appearance in Person for us is required thereunto 2. The Representation of his Death Oblation and Sacrifice for us which gives Power Life and Efficacy unto his Intercession Thence he appears in the midst of the Throne as a Lamb that had been slain Revel 5. 8. Both these are required to make his Intercession Sacerdotal But 3. both these do not render it Prayer or Intercession For Intercession is Prayer 1 Tim. 2. 1. Rom. 8. 26. Wherefore there is in it moreover a putting up a requesting and Offering unto God of his desires and will for the Church attended with Care Love and Compassion Zech. 1. 12. Thus far then may we proceed 1. It is a part of his Sacerdotal Office He intercedes for us as the High Priest over the House of God 2. It is the first and principal way whereby he Acts and exerciseth his Love compassion and care towards the Church 3. That he hath respect therein unto every Individual Believer and all their especial occasions if any man sin we have an Advocate 4. That there is in his intercession an effectual signification of his will and desire unto his Father For it hath the nature of Prayer in it and by it he expresseth his Dependance upon God 5. That it respects the Application of all the Fruits Effects and Benefits of his whole Mediation unto the Church For this is the formal nature of it that it is the way and means appointed of God in the holy dispensation of himself and his Grace unto mankind whereby the continual Application of all the Benefits of the Death of Christ and all effects of the Promises of the Covenant shall be communicated unto us unto his Praise and Glory 6 The efficacy of this intercession as it is Sacerdotal depends wholly on the antecedent Oblation and sacrifice of himself which is therefore as it were represented unto God therein This is evident from the nature and order of the Typical institutions whereby it was prefigured and whereunto by our Apostle it is accommodated But what belongs unto the manner of the Transactions of these things in Heaven I know not The third thing observed was the connexion of the two things mentioned or their Relation one unto another namely the perpetual life of Christ and his intercession He lives for ever to make intercession His intercession is the end of his Mediatory Life not absolutely nor only but principally He lives to Rule his Church he lives to subdue his Enemies for he must raign until they are all made his footstool He lives to give the Holy Spirit in all his blessed effects unto Believers But because all these things proceed originally by an emanation of Power and Grace from God and are given out into the hand of Christ upon his intercession that may well be esteemed the principal end of his Mediatory Life So he speaks expresly concerning that great fruit and effect of this Life of him in sending of the Spirit I will pray the Father I will intercede with him for it and he shall send you another Comforter John 14. 16. And the Power which he exerts in the subduing and destruction of the Enemies of his Kingdom is expresly promised unto him upon his Intercession for it Psal 2. 8 9 For this intercession of Christ is the great Ordinance of God for the exercise of his Power towards and the Communication of his grace unto the Church unto his Praise and Glory So doth our High Priest live to make intercession for us Many things we may from hence observe 1. So great and glorious is the work of saving Believers unto the utmost that it is necessary that the Lord Christ should lead a Mediatory Life in Heaven for the perfecting and accomplishment of it He lives for ever to make intercession for us It is generally acknowledged that sinners could not be saved without the Death of Christ but that Believers could not be saved without the life of Christ following it is not so much considered See Rom. 5. 10. Chap. 8. 34 35 c. It is it may be thought by some that when he had declared the name of God and revealed the whole counsel of his Will when he had given us the great example of Love and Holiness in this life when he had fulfilled all Righteousness redeemed us by his blood and made Attonement for our sins by the Oblation of himself confirming his Truth and Acceptation with God in all these things by his Resurrection from the dead wherein he was declared to be the Son of God with Power that he might have now left us to deal for our selves and to build our eternal safety on the Foundation that he had laid But alas when all this was done if he had only ascended into his own glory to enjoy his Majesty Honour and Dominion without continuing his Life and Office in our behalf we had been left poor and helpless so that both we and all our Right unto an Heavenly Inheritance should have been made a prey unto every subtle and powerful Adversary He could therefore no otherwise comfort his Disciples when he was leaving this world but by promising that he would not leave them Orphans John 14. 18. that is that he would still continue to Act for them to be their Patron and to exercise the Office of a Mediator and Advocate with the Father for them Without this he knew they must be Orphans that is such as are not able to defend themselves from injuries nor secure their own Right unto their Inheritance The sure Foundations of our eternal Salvation were laid in his Death and Resurrection So it is said that when God laid the Foundation of the Earth and placed the corner-stone thereof that the morning stars sang together and all the Sons of God shouted for Joy Job 38. 7. Although the Foundations were only laid yet that being done by infinite Power and Wisdom which would infallibly accomplish and perfect the whole it was a blessed cause of Praise and ascribing glory to God Yet were the continued Actings of the same Power required unto the Perfection of it The Foundation of the new Creation was laid
gloriously in the Death and Resurrection of Christ so as to be the matter of triumphant Praises unto God Such is the Triumph thereon described Col. 2. 15 1 Tim. 3. 16. And it may be observed that as on the laying of the Foundation of the Earth all the Holy Angels triumphed in the expression and demonstration of the infinite Wisdom Power and Goodness of God which they beheld so in the Foundation of the New Creation the Apostate Angels who repined at it and opposed it unto their Power were lead Captives carried in Triumph and made the Footstool of the glory of Christ. But all this Joy and Triumph is built on the security of the unchangeable Love Care and Power of Jesus Christ gloriously to accomplish the work which he had undertaken For had he left it when he left the Earth it had never been finished For great was that part of the work which yet remained to be perfected Neither could the Remainder of this work be committed unto any other hand He employeth others under him in his work to act Ministerially in his name and Authority So he useth the Ministery of Angels and Men. But did not he himself continue to act in them by them with them and without them the whole work would fail and be disappointed In one instance of the Revelation of the will of God concerning the state of the Church by the opening of the Book wherein it was recorded there was none found worthy in Heaven or Earth to do it but the Lamb that was slain the Lion of the Tribe of Judah Revel 5. 5. Chap. 6. 1. How much less is any Creature able to accomplish all that remains for the saving of the Church unto the utmost Who can expresse the opposition that continues to be made unto this work of compleating the Salvation of Believers what Power is able to conflict and conquer the remaining strength of Sin the opposition of Sathan and the World How innumerable are the Temptations which every individual Believer is exposed unto each of them in its own nature ruinous and pernitious God alone knoweth all things perfectly in infinite wisdom and as they are He alone knows how great a work it is to save Believers unto the utmost what Wisdom what Power what Grace and Mercy is requisite thereunto He alone knows what is meet unto the way and manner of it so as it may be perfected unto his own Glory His infinite wisdom alone hath found out and determined the glorious and mysterious ways of the Emanation of Divine Power and Grace unto this End Upon all these Grounds unto all these Purposes hath he appointed the continual intercession of the Lord Christ in the most Holy place This he saw needful and expedient unto the Salvation of the Church and his own glory So will he exert his own Almighty Power unto those ends The good Lord help me to believe and adore the Mystery of it 2. The most glorious Prospect that we can take into the things that are within the vail into the remaining Transactions of the work of our Salvation in the most Holy place is in the Representation that is made unto us of the intercession of Christ. Of old when Moses went into the Tabernacle all the People looked after him until he entred in and then the Pillar of the Cloud stood at the door of it that none might see into the Holy place Exod. 33. 8 9. And when the Lord Christ was taken into Heaven the Disciples looked after him until a cloud interposed at the Tabernacle door and took him out of their sight Act. 1. 9. And when the High Priest was to enter into the Tabernacle to carry the Blood of the sacrifice of Expiation into the most Holy place no man be he Priest or not was suffered to enter into or abide in the Tabernacle Levit. 16. 17. Our High Priest is now likewise entred into the most Holy place within the second vail where no eye can pierce unto him Yet is he there as an High Priest which makes Heaven it self to be a glorious Temple and a place as yet for the exercise of an instituted Ordinance such as the Priesthood of Christ is But who can look into who can comprehend the Glories of those Heavenly Administrations Some have pretended a view into the orders and service of the whole Chore of Angels but have given us only a Report of their own imaginations What is the Glory of the Throne of God what the Order and Ministry of his Saints and Holy ones what is the manner of the worship that is given unto him that sits on the Throne and to the Lamb the Scripture doth sparingly deliver as knowing our disability whilst we are cloathed with flesh and inhabit Tabernacles of clay to comprehend aright such transcendent Glories The best and most steady view we can have of these things is in the Account which is given us of the intercession of Christ. For herein we see him by Faith yet vested with the Office of the Priesthood and continuing in the Discharge of it This makes Heaven a Temple as was said and the feat of instituted worship Rev 7. 15. Hence in his Appearance unto John he was cloathed with a Garment down to the Foot and girt about the paps with a golden Girdle both which were sacerdotal vestments Rev. 1. 13. Herein is God continually glorifyed hereby is the Salvation of the Church continually carried on and consummated This is the work of Heaven which we may safely contemplate by Faith 3. The intercession of Christ is the great evidence of the continuance of his Love and Care his Pity and Compassion towards his Church Had he only continued to Rule the Church as its King and Lord he had manifested his glorious Power his Righteousness and Faithfulness The Scepter of his Kingdom is a Scepter of Righteousness But Mercy and Compassion Love and Tenderness are constantly ascribed unto him as our High Priest See Chap. 4. 15. Chap. 5. 1 2. So the great exercise of his sacerdotal Office in laying down his Life for us and expiating our sins by his Blood is still peculiarly ascribed unto his Love Gal. 2. 20 Ephes. 5. 2. Revel 1. 5. Wherefore these properties of Love and Compassion belong peculiarly unto the Lord Christ as our High Priest All Men who have any spiritual experience and understanding will acknowledge how great the concernment of Believers is in these things and how all their Consolation in this World depends upon them He whose soul hath not been refreshed with a due Apprehension of the unspeakable Love Tenderness and Compassion of Jesus Christ is a stranger unto the Life of Faith and unto all true spiritual Consolation But how shall we know that the Lord Christs is thus tender Loving and Compassionate that he continueth so to be or what evidence or Testimony have we of it It is true he was eminently so when he was upon the Earth in the days
That this difference so far as it had yet continued had no way alienated his Mind and Affections from them though he knew how great their mistake was and what danger even of eternal ruin it exposed them unto Hereby were the Minds of those Hebrews secured from prejudice against his Person and his Doctrin and inclined unto a compliance with his Exhortation Had he called them Hereticks and Schismaticks and I know not what other Names of reproach which are the terms of use upon the like occasions amongst us he had in all probability turned that which was lame quite out of the way But he had another Spirit was under another conduct of Wisdom and Grace than most Men are now acquainted withal It is not every Mistake every Errour though it be in things of great importance while it overthrows not the Foundation that can divest Men of a fraternal interest with others in the Heavenly calling 2. There is a Note of Inference from the preceding discourse declaring it the ground of the present Exhortation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Therefore seeing that these things are now made manifest unto you seeing it is so evidently testified unto that the Old Covenant Sacrifices and Worship could not make us perfect nor give us an Access unto God whereon they are removed and taken away which the Scripture fully testifies unto and seeing all this is effected or accomplished in the Office and by the Sacrifice of Christ which they could not effect and priviledges are thereon granted unto Believers which they were not before made partakers of Let us make use of them unto the Glory of God and our own Salvation in the duties which they necessarily require And we may observe that the Apostle applies this Inference from his discourse unto the use and improvement of the Liberty and Priviledges granted unto us in Christ with the Holy Worship belonging thereunto as we shall see in opening of the words Howbeit there is another conclusion implied in the words though not expressed by him and this is that they should cease and give over their attendance unto the Legal Worship and Sacrifices as those which now were altogether useless being indeed abolished This is the principal design of the Apostle in the whole Epistle namely to call off the believing Hebrews from all adherence unto and conjunction in Mosaical Institutions For he knew the danger both Spiritual and Temporal which would accompany and arise from such an adherence For 1. It would insensibly weaken their Faith in Christ and give them a disregard of Evangelical Worship which did indeed prove unto many of them a cause of that Apostacy and final Destruction which he so frequently warns them against 2. Whereas God had determined now speedily to put an utter end unto the City Temple and all its Worship by an Universal desolation for the sins of the people if they did obstinately adhere unto the observance of that Worship it was justly to be feared that they would perish in that destruction that was approaching which probably many of them did To instruct them in that light and knowledge of the truth that might deliver them from these evils was the first design of the Apostle in the Doctrinal part of this Epistle Yet doth he not plainly and in terms express it any where in this Epistle not in this place where it was most properly and naturally to be introduced yet he doth that which evidently includes it namely exhort them unto those duties which on the principles he hath declared are utterly inconsistent with Mosaical Worship and this is our free entrance into the Holiest by the Blood of Jesus For an entrance in any sence with our worship into the most holy place is inconsistent with and destructive of all Mosaical Institutions And this was an effect of the singular Wisdom wherewith the Apostle was furnished to write this Epistle For had he directly and in terms opposed their Observation no small tumult and out-cry would have been made against it and great provocations had been given unto the Unbelieving Jews But he doth the same thing no less effectually in these words wherein notwithstanding there is scarce a word which that application of his discourse doth not follow upon And his Wisdom herein ought to be an instructive example unto all those that are called unto the instruction of others in the dispensation of the Gospel especially such as through any mistakes do oppose themselves unto the truth Such things as will give exasperation unto the Spirits or advantages unto the temptations of Men ought to be avoided or treated on with that Wisdom Gentleness and Meekness as may be no prejudice unto them This way of Procedure doth the same Apostle expresly prescribe unto all Ministers of the Gospel 2 Tim. 2. 23 24 25 26. 3. There is in the words the Priviledge which is the foundation of the duty exhorted unto having therefore boldness to enter into the holiest for a regular entrance into or of the most holy The priviledge intended is directly opposed unto the state of things under the Law and from the consideration of it is the nature of it to be learned For the entrance into the holiest in the Tabernacle belonged unto the Worship of the Church it was the principal part thereof but it had many imperfection attending it 1. It was not into the special presence of God but only unto a place made with hands filled with some representations of things that could not be seen 2. None might ever enter into it but the High-Priest alone and that only once a year 3. The Body of the people the whole Congregation were therefore joyntly and severally utterly excluded from any entrance into it 4. The prohibition of this entrance into this Holy place belonged unto that Bondage wherein they were kept under the Law which hath been before declared The priviledge here mentioned being opposed to this state of things among them which respected their present Worship It is certain that it doth concern the present Worship of God by Christ under the Gospel And they are therefore utterly mistaken who suppose the entrance into the most holy to be an entrance into Heaven after this Life for all Believers For the Apostle doth not here oppose the glorious state of Heaven unto the Church of the Hebrews and their Legal Services but the priviledges of the Gospel-state and worship only Nor would it have been to his purpose so to have done For the Hebrews might have said that although the Glory of Heaven after this life do exceed the Glories of the Services of the Tabernacle which none ever questioned yet the benefit use and efficacy of their present Ordinances and Worship might be more excellent than any thing that they could obtain by the Gospel Neither were believers then also excluded from Heaven after death any more than now Therefore the priviledge mentioned is that which belongs unto the Gospel Church in its perfect
state in this World And the exercise and use of it doth consist in our drawing nigh unto God in Holy Services and Worship through Christ as the Apostle declares ver 22 23. There is then a two-fold opposition in these words unto the state of the people under the Law 1. As unto the Spirit and frame of mind in the Worshippers Or 2. As unto the place of the Worship from whence they were excluded and whereunto we are admitted 1. The First is in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 boldness There were two things with respect unto those Worshippers in this matter 1. A Legal Prohibition from entring into the holy place whereon they had no liberty or freedom so to do because they were forbidden on several penalties 2. Dread and fear which deprived them of all boldness or holy confidence in their approaches unto God therefore the Apostle expresseth the contrary frame of believers under the New Testament by a word that signifieth both Liberty or Freedom from any Prohibition and boldness with confidence in the exercise of that liberty I have spoken before of the various use and signification of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Apostle both in this and other Epistles useth frequently to express both their right and liberty and confidence unto and in their access unto God of believers under the New Testament in opposition to the state of them under the Old We have a right unto it we have liberty without restraint by any Prohibition we have confidence and assurance without dread or fear 2. This liberty we have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 aditus introitus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the true Sanctuary the holy place not made with hands See Chap. 9. 11 12. The immediate gracious presence of God himself in Christ Jesus Whatever was Typically represented in the most holy place of Old we have access unto that is unto God himself we have an access in one spirit by Christ. 1. This is the great fundamental priviledge of the Gospel that believers in all their holy Worship have liberty boldness and confidence to enter with it and by it into the gracious presence of God They are not hindred by any prohibition God set bounds unto Mount Sinai that none should pass or break through into his presence in the giving of the Law He hath set none to Mount Sion but all believers have Right Title and Liberty to approach unto him even unto this Throne There is no such Order now that he who draws nigh shall be cut off but on the contrary that he that doth not so do shall be destroyed 2. Hence there is no dread fear or terror in their Minds Hearts or Consciences when they make those approaches unto God This was a consequent of the same Interdict of the Law which is now taken away They have not received the Spirit of Bondage unto fear but the Spirit of the Son whereby with holy boldness they cry Abba Father for where the Spirit of the Lord is there is Liberty they have freedom unto and confidence in their duties and therein consists the greatest evidence of our interest in the Gospel and Priviledges thereof 3. The nature of Gospel Worship consists in this that it is an entrance with boldness into the presence of God However Men may multiply duties of what sort or nature soever they be if they design not in and by them to enter into the presence of God if they have not some experience that so they do if they are taken up with other thoughts and rest in the outward performance of them they belong not unto Evangelical Worship The only exercise of Faith in them is in an entrance into the presence of God 4. Our approach unto God in Gospel Worship is unto him as evidencing himself in a way of Grace and Mercy Hence it is said to be an entrance into the holiest for in the holy place were all the pledges and tokens of Gods grace and favour as we have manifested upon the foregoing Chapter And as the taking off of the old prohibition gives us liberty and the institution of the Worship of the Gospel gives us Title unto this priviledge so the consideration of the nature of that presence of God whereunto we approach gives us boldness thereunto 5. The procuring cause of this priviledge is in the next place exprest we have it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Blood of Jesus say we It is the procuring cause of this priviledge that is intended which is often so proposed The Blood of Jesus Christ is the same with his Sacrifice the Offering of himself or the Offering of his Body once only For he Offered himself in and by the effusion of his Blood whereby he made attonement for Sin which could not be otherwise effected And it is here opposed as also in the whole preceding discourse unto the Blood of the Legal Sacrifices They could not procure they did not effect any such liberty of access unto God in the holy place This was done by the Blood of Jesus only whereby he accomplished what the Sacrifices of the Law could not do And it is a cause of this priviledge on a twofold account 1. In its respect unto God in its Oblation 2. In respect unto the Consciences of Believers in its Application 1. By its Oblation it removed and took away all causes of distance between God and Believers It made attonement for them answered the Law removed the Curse broke down the partition-wall or the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances wherein were all the prohibitions of approaching unto God with boldness Hereby also he rent the Veil which interposed and hid the gracious presence of God from us And these things being removed out of the way by the Blood of the Oblation or Offering of Christ peace being thereby made with God he procured him to be reconciled unto us inviting us to accept and make use of that reconciliation by receiving the attonement Hence believers have boldness to appear before him and approach unto his presence See Rom. 5. 11. 2 Cor. 5. 18 19 20 21. Eph. 2. 13 14 15 16 17 18. Hereon was it the procuring the purchasing cause of this priviledge 2. It is the cause of it with respect unto the Consciences of Believers in the Application of it unto their Souls There are not only all the hindrances mentioned on the part of God lying in the way of our access unto him but also the Consciences of Men from a sense of the guilt of Sin were filled with fear and dread of God and durst not so much as desire an immediate access unto him The efficacy of the Blood of Christ being through believing communicated unto them takes away all this dread and fear And this is done principally by his bestowing on them the holy Spirit which is a Spirit of Liberty as our Apostle shews at large 2 Cor. 3. Wherefore we have boldness