reason then why the Body of Christ is not or ought not to be often offered is not because all our sinnes were actually remitted by the once offering of it or remitted before they were committed but because the substance or matter of the sacrifice is of the same force at this day to remit sinnes that it was of whilest it was offered For his humane nature was consecrated by death and by his bloody Passion to be a sacrifice of everlasting Vertue to be the continual propitiation for our sinnes 7 If either the actual sinnes of all men Christs Resurrection our baptism needless if sinnes be remitted before they be committed or the sinnes of the Elect in speciall had been so remitted by Christs death as some conceive they were that is absolutely pardoned before they were committed there had been no end or use of Christs Resurrection in respect of us no need of Baptism yet was Baptism from the hour of his resurrection necessarie unto all that did beleive in his death and resurrection The urgent and indispensable necessitie of Baptism especially in respect of actual beleivers is not any where more Emphatically intimated than in St. Peters Answer to the Jewes Whose hearts were pierc't with sorrow that they had been the causes of Christs death They in this stound or sting of Conscience demand Men and brethren what shall we do and Peter answered them Repent and be Baptized Every one of you In the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sinnes And they that gladly received the word were Baptized the same day Acts 2. 37 38 41. These men had been deeply tainted with sin not original onely but with sinnes actual of the worst kind guiltie they were in a high degree of the death of the Son of God yet had they as well their actual as their original sinnes remitted by Baptism It is then an unsound and imperfect Doctrin that sin original onely is taken away or remitted by Baptism for whatsoever sinnes are remitted or taken away by Christs death the same sins are in the same manner remitted and taken away by Baptism into his death actual sinnes are remitted in such as are guiltie of actual sinnes when they are baptized though onely sin Original be actually remitted in those which are not guiltie of actual sinnes as in Infants No mans sinnes are actually remitted before he be actually guilty of them 8. The Question is how either sin original is remitted or how any work of Satan is dissolved by Baptism And this Question in the General is righly resolved by saying They are remitted by faith But this general Resolytion sufficeth not unless we know the Object of our Faith in this particular Now the particular Object of our Faith of that faith by which sinnes whether by Baptism or otherwise are remitted is not our general Belief in Christ even our belief of Christ dying for us in particular will not suffice unlesse it include our Belief of the Everlasting Vertue of his bloudie Sacrifice and of his everlasting Priest-hood for purifying and cleansing our soules No sinnes be truly remitted unless they be remitted by the Office or exercise of his Priest-hood and whilest so remitted they are not remitted by any other Sacrifice then by the sole vertue of his body and bloud which he once offered for all for the sinnes of all It is not the Vertue or Efficacie of the consecrated water in which we were washed but the vertue of his Bloud which was once shed for us and which by Baptism is sprinkled upon us or communicated unto us which immediately cleanseth us from all our sinnes From this everlasting Vertue of this his bloudy Sacrifice Faith by the ministerie of baptism is immediatly gotten in such as had it not before And in such as have Faith before they be baptized the guilt of Actual sinns is remitted by the exercise or Act of Faith as it apprehends the everlasting Efficacy of this sacrifice and by the prayer of faith and supplication unto our High Priest Faith then is as the mouth or appetite by which were receive this food of Life and is a good sign of health but it is the food itself received which must continue health and strengthen spiritual life in us and the food of life is no other then Christs Body and Bloud and it is our High Priest himself which must give us this food Baptism saith St. Peter 1 Pet. 3. 20. doth save us what Baptism doth save us not the putting away the filth of the flesh yet this is the immediate effect of the water in baptism but the answer or stipulation of a good conscience towards God But how doth this kind of Baptism or this concomitant of Baptism save us The Apostle in the same place tells us by the resurrection of Jesus Christ The answer or stipulation of a good conscience includes an illumination of our spirits by the Spirit of God a qualification by which we are made sonnes of Light being before the sonnes of darkness But That by this qualification we become the sonnes of Light That this qualification is by baptism wrought in us That by this qualification however wrought in us we are saved from our sinnes All this is immediately from the vertue of Christs Resurrection That is as you have heard before he was consecrated by the sufferings of death to be an everlasting Priest and by his resurrection from death his body and bloud became an everlasting Propitiation for sinnes an inexhaustible Fountain of Grace by which we are purifyed from the dead works of sinne 9. It is true again that in the Sacrament of Christs Body and Bloud there is a propitiation for our sinnes because He is really present in it who is the propitiation for our sinnes But it no way hence followes that there is any propitiatorie sacrifice for sin in this Sacrament He becomes the propitiation for our sinnes he actually remits our sinnes not directly and immediately by the Elements of Bread and Wine nor by any other kind of Local Presence or Compresence with these Elements than is in Baptism The Orthodoxal Antients use the same Language for expressing his Presence in Baptism and in the Eucharist they stick not to say that Christ is present or Latent in the water as well as in the Elements of Bread and Wine Their meaning is that neither of these Elements or sensible substances can directly cleanse us from our sinnes by any vertue communicated unto them or inherent in them but only as they are pledges or assurances of Christs peculiar presence in them and of our true investiture in Christ by them We are not then to receive the Elements of bread and wine only in remembrance that Christ dyed for us but in remembrance or assurance likewise that his body which was once given for us doth by its everlasting Vertue preserve our bodies and souls unto everlasting Life and that his bloud which was but once shed for us doth
justly be allowed in any Academicall Act or Commencement albeit the Answerer or Defendant were furnished with no other grounds or occasions of his Theses besides that usually avouched Distinction between the Act and Obliquitie of the Act specially if the Distinction were applyed unto the First Sin of our First Parents In that sin whether we refer it to our Father Adam or to our Mother Eve the Act and the Obliquitie are altogether as unseparably annexed as Rotunditie or roundnes is with a Sphere or moulded Bullet And to imagine there should be one Cause of the Act and another of the Obliquitie or sinfulness of the Act would be as gross a Soloecisme as to assigne or seek after any other Cause of the Rotunditie or roundnesse of a Sphere or Bullet besides him that frames the one or moulds the other or as it would be to enquire any other Cause of the equality between two bodies before unequall besides him that makes the quantity to be of one and the same-size or scantling or of the similitude between the Fleece of a black sheepe and of a white sheep perfectly dyed black besides the Dyer Now the similitude betwixt that which is perfectly dyed black and that which is black by nature doth inevitably result from the Dyer without the intervention of any other Cause imaginable Easie it were to produce a volume of like instances in the workes of nature or of mens works and practises upon them all of them concludently enforcing the resolution of the former Probleme to be allowable in Schooles by most perfect and absolute Induction if Arts or Sciences were once so happy as to have none but true and accurate Artists to be their Judges As indeed they are the sole competent Judges in like Cases and Judges they are within these precincts as Competent as the Reverend Judges of this or any other Land are in Causes Civil Municipal or Criminal 2. Admit then a man were found guilty of murther by a Jury of his honest Neighbours upon the Authentick Testimonies of two or three witnesses which had seen him run his Neighbour through the body in some vitall part or to cleave his head in two and a Philosopher or Physitian should undertake to arrest the Judgement or make Remonstrance to the Judge that the Delinquent arraigned and convicted by the Jurie was not the true or immediate Cause of the others death upon these or the like allegations out of his own facultie That death properly consists in the dissolution of naturall heate and moysture whereas the party arraigned did never intend to make any such dissolution or to terminate his Action to the point of death but onely to thrust his sword through him or to knock him in the head which Actions can have no direct Terme besides the Vbi or Terme of locall motion Can we imagine that any Judge could be so milde as not to censure such an Apologizer for a saucy Artificiall Foole or a Crack'd-brained Sophister And yet this Apologie is not cannot be in vulgar judgments so Censurable of Artificiall folly as the former Apologie for salving the Escapes Errors or ill Expressions of some Learned and Pious Men by nice distinctions betwixt the Act and the Sinfulnesse of it in our First Parents Case was For there is not so immediate or so absolute or necessary connexion between death and the deadliest wound that can be given to any man as there is between Acts peremptorily forbidden by the Law of God and the Obliquitie or sinfulnesse of them For there is not neither is it possible there should be any minute of time or which is less then the least part of a minute any moment of time betwixt such Acts and the Obliquitie resulting from them Both of them come together both in respect of order of time and of nature by absolute indispensable Necessity Whereas between death and wounds given meritorious of Capital punishment there usually is a distance of time and oftentimes no absolute or unpreventable necessity that the one should follow within a year and a day of the other 3. But the best Method to convince such as Invented or used the former Distinction of gross error and somewhat more then so will be to retort their own Illustrations or justifications of it upon themselves as I have learned by successefull Experience upon some learned Ingenuous students which have revoked their own opinions and reclaimed others upon the reading of my meditations upon this argument in another Dialect In solenni Lectione One of the most usuall Illustrations or intended corroborations of the former distinction is borrowed from a Man that rides a Lame or halting horse Such a rider say they especially if he ride with switch and spur is the Cause why the horse goes or runs as fast as he can but not the Cause of his lamenesse or of his halting Of his lamenesse supposed he was lam'd before the Rider I confess is no Cause yet of his actuall halting down-right or of the increase of the lameness which will follow upon the unseasonable riding or over-riding he is the only Cause For if the poor Beast might have rested his bones when he was enforced to trot or gallop he would not have halted at all at that time nor would he have been so grievously lame as by such unseasonable usage he is But this instance or Illustration suppose it were not much amisse in respect of men now living can no way sute or fit the Question concerning the sin of our First Parents For Adam at his creation was no way lame or defective either in soul or body before he tasted of the forbidden Fruit. Now if the Almighty Creator had been the cause of this Act he had been as true a Cause of the First sin or of Adams halting in his service as he that bestrides a sound and lusty horse and runs him upon the spur in a rugged and stony ground or in a deep way is of the lamenesse of the death or any disease which ensues such desperate riding 4. Many commit more gross Idolatry with their own fancies then the Heathen did with their Idols To imagin that God should deal so hardly with the First Adam as to give him a Law which he intended to make him break and yet to punish him with death for the breach of it Or that the Second Adam the wisdom of God should send wise men and Prophets to Jerusalem to the intent or End that She should stone or put them to death or for this purpose that their bloud should in later dayes be required of Her as some in our times have publickly taught is an Imagination in it self much worse and more dangerous then the erection of Images though Roman-wise in Reformed Churches A greater Abomination then any Idol of the Heathens For Images or Idols are but the External Objects of or enticements unto grosse Idolatry Nor was it the Carpenter or Statuary that did make the Heathen gods
or at least of the increase or abundance of it in the world The Apostles meaning is that the Law was given as a praeparative Physick or medicine to let such as were sick of sin as all were before the Law was given understand in what danger they were or to give them notice of the abundance of corruption which was so deeply seated in their Nature that it could not be throughly purged by the Law which only set sin a working that men might seek more eagerly after a Better medicine to wit Faith in Christ That this was our Apostles true meaning in this place is apparent from the Parallel-passages to these Romanes Chap. 7. 7. what shall we say then is the Law sin God forbid Nay I had not known sin that is I had not taken true notice of the measure or danger of it but by the Law for I had not known Lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not Covet The Law to which these words referr is the tenth Commandement wherein the Coveting of some few particulars as of our Neighbours Wife or of his goods is only expresly forbidden But sin taking occasion by this Negative Commandment wrought in our Apostle as he himself testifies all manner of Concupiscence for without the Law sin was dead that is He did not feel the Motions or Paroxysmes of sin untill the Law was laid unto him as a Preparative Medicine unto better Physick And againe ver ninth I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandement came Sâ—n revived and I died And againe ver 11. 12. 13. Sin taking occasion by the Commandement deceived me and by it slew me Wherefore the Law is Holy and the Commandement Holy and just and good Was that then which is good made death unto me God forbid But sin that it might appeare sin working dâ—ath in me by that which is good that sin by the commandement might become exceeding Sinfull It is a Point observable and fully paralel to our Apostles doctrine That the Easterne part of the world did rather loath then long after Circumcision Vntill our Saviours Resurrection and the Apostles peremptory forbidding the practise of it From the former doctrine of our Apostle I have learned satisfaction to a Probleme which had often and long Perplexed my thoughts The Probleme was this Why Men Unto whose care and fidelity a man might safely commit his Fortunes or his life upon their honest word became most carelesse and unfaithfull in matters whereto they are punctually tyed by oath The reason is Because the interposition or obligation by oath is as the coming of a Law which provokes the Corruption of Nature whose longing or lust after things forbidden rather then it should be unsatisfied drawes men otherwise morally honest to become like wayward intemperat Patients which rather chose to nourish the longing humours of the disease or infirmity then to observe the prescription of the Chirurgeon ready to pull off the plaister though with the live-skin or flesh rather then to endure the working of it for a moment 4. But here some have Questioned Whether this Chapter be meant of the Regenerate or Vnregenerate Man A Captious Interrogatorie if Regeneration were but one Act or a resultance of some Few Acts or Conflicts between the Flesh and the Spirit But seeing Regeneration in true Theologie includes Acts almost numberlesse or a Combate somewhat longer then Mortification doth This Chapter if we speak of Christians must be Meant not of the Man truely Regenerated or perfectly Mortified but of a Man Inter Regenerandum during the intermediate Acts or conflicts betwixt the beginning and the Consummation of his * See the 9 Article of the Church of England Regeneration Or if we speake of One that beleeves the Old Testament better then the New as of a Jew or Mahumetane it cannot be meant of a Lawlesse Man but of a man under the hammer of Gods Law given by Moses For there must be a Laying of some Law or Other to the heart before the Conflict here Mentioned can begin or Sin inherent be so Provoked as our Apostle tells us it is 5. Why Sin Originall is more provoked by the Negative then by the Affirmative Precepts He that will diligently peruse our Apostles forementioned Passages Romans 7. in the Language wherein he wrote will easily observe with me That the occasion which Sin tooke By the Law to deceive him as it doth yet to deceive us was from the Negative Precepts or Commandements of the Law not from the Positive or Affirmative Now why the Negative Precepts that one especially Thou shalt not Lust Thou shalt not Covet should a great deale more provoke or more forcibly revive the seeds of Originall Sin inherent in us then the Affirmative Precepts usually doe the Reason is Evident because nothing is nominated or proposed unto us in the Affirmative Precepts but that which in its nature is truely and sincerely Good without the mixture of Evill And being such is more apt to revive or quicken the Notions of the Law of Nature or Reason or those Reliques of Gods Image which remaine in our Nature since our first Parents fall then to Enlive the seeds of sin or to provoke our inclinations unto Evill On the contrary In every Negative Precept there is a Proposall or representation of those things which be in their Nature truely Evill and therefore most apt to incite or provoke our natural Inclinations unto the evill forbidden or to enrage the Reliques of our first Parents sin inherent in Us after the same manner and for the same reason that the representation of red Colours without any other Provocation given is to provoke or stirre the blood of beasts or Cattel which are of a more pure or sanguine Constitution Thus some tame Beasts as Bulls or Kine are aptest to turne man-keen upon such as are cloathed in bright red or Scarlet And a grave Learned ‖ Scortum Hispani generis lepidum ut serebatur formosum mula ut Romae meretrices cum Amatoribus solent animi gratia gestabatur Haec cum venisset ad Thermas Diocletianas Vivarium ferarum ingressa nec contenta cicures vagantes Spectasse precibus contendit aegâ—è impetrat à beluarum Magistro ut ingenti urso cavea separatim incluso sed quem constabat in Neminem antea desaevjisse exitum aperiret Facta potestate ursus erumpit mulam terresacit excussam mulierculam Caeteris qui aderant diffugentibus invadit dictoque citius strangulat contrito capite primùm avulsa ubera deinde natem alteram devorat unguibus dentibus laceratam Esseratam bestiam existimo colore coccineae vestis quam induerat misella speciem sanguinis Praeferentem Sepulveda Epist lib. 2. ep 15. Historian sometimes Chronicler to Charls the Fift in an Epistle of his to his friend relates a sad accident of a Beare which had never been observed to have raged upon Any yet being let loose from
Apprehensions or Boastings and that is given us by our Saviour himself in this Gospel Chap. 14. vers 15 23 24. If ye love me keep my Commandments And again Chap. 15. vers 10. If ye keep my Commandments ye shall abide in my love How many may we find who in distresse or danger whether by Sea or Land specially in grievous stormes or sicknesse will seriously purpose and Resume that Branch of their Vow in Baptism ☜ To for sake the Devil and all his works the Lusts of the Flesh the Pomps and vanities of this wicked world And yet the Same Men being restored to health and probable safety will of Late zealous Professors and solemn votaries turn Gaderenes or Gergesites ready upon new Opportunities or Provocations of untame Desires to wish Christ to depart out of their Coasts rather then His Residence in their Hearts or Brains should give a continual check to their swinish appetites or Brutish Fancies And thus to do is not to keep but to violate Christs Commandments which whosoever doth not keep as well in This Particular of mortifying the works or Lusts of the Flesh as in other Duties doth not truly Believe in him shall not without hearty Repentance or new Purification of the heart and spirit either see God or be partaker of Christs Kingdom 11. Another Precept of Christ there is more General then the Former Whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you even so do unto them for this is the Law and the Prophets So far is the whole Christian world as we call it from keeping this Commandment that the Practises most Contrary to it are so Vniversal and so violent as that both the Casuists and professed Interpreters of Scriptures have almost lost the true meaning of it at least have utterly neglected the extending or branching of it into useful Rules of Good life or for bringing forth the Fruits of the Spirit And which is worse such learned and pious men as have undertaken the Cure of souls and have been solemnly sworn to the faithful Execution of Pastoral Charge dare not press the Observance of this Great Commandment upon their Flock which daily and hourly most shamefully transgresse it partly by the uncontroled Practises of stubborn people partly by Authorized Rules in Courts of Justice No Prophet of the Lord dare speak his mind or interpreter of the Gospel or spiritual Governour dare put his Commission from Christ in Execution unlesse such as are resolved to suffer a Martyrdom from their flock or from the Professors of the one or other Law established throughout this Kingdom Without Reference to any particular Cause or Person I dare boldly pronounce in the General That not the Twentieth Part of Tedious Suits or Vexations in Law or other Grievances or oppressions would either be set on foot by the People or suffered to be prosecuted by Men in Authority if the Fear of God Belief in Christ Loyalty to their Soveraign Lord or Good Affection to their Country were planted in Either of them truly or indeed 12. The General Neglect of this Great Commandment of doing as we would be done unto in former times of our security and Peace hath been alwayes Dangerous But the Violation of it in these Times of Mortality of Calamity and more then wonted danger of worse to ensue is Prodigious For preventing the Execution of Gods Judgements threatned for our Violation of This and other Commandments of Christ I must entreat all Sorts of men that hear me this day in the same words for sense and meaning which a Zealous and Learned Father sometimes used in like case Parcite Regi Parcite Regno parcite Populo Anglicano parcite Animabus Vestris If there be any true Love and Loyalty in us towards our Gratious Soveraign Lord and his Royal Issue any good Affection towards our Native Country or to our souls Let us abate our wonted Pride and Luxury our wonted Covetousnesse Let us not think it sufficient to abstain from Unjust Unchristian Vexation and Oppression of our Neighbours unlesse we seriously account that measure of Contentment of our desires of what kind soever which heretofore hath been Lawful to be in these times more then most Vnexpedient To use that Plenty of Diet or measure of Recreation but especially that Benefit or Advantage of Laws for advancing our selves or increasing our Fortune which heretofore we have done perhaps without sin Let This also in these times be esteemed Impious or a sin not to be Expiated without hearty Repentance and extraordinary Performance of works of Mercy Dan. 4. 27. The End of the Second Sermon 13. * The Authors Connexion of the 21 Chapter to the 4 Section as it was before These two Sermons were inserted But the more we labour further to unfold this Argument of our Natural Servitude unto sin the faster we shall draw another Knot or the more we presse the several Branches of this Servitude upon the Conscience of the Untegenerate or not well sanctified man the greater Perplexity we shall Create unto him in another part of Theology whose Knowledge is altogether as Necessary and as useful as our Experience of Natural Servitude unto sin is The Knot or perplexed Difficulty is What Kind or what portion of Freedom of Will is or can be Compossible with Absolute Servitude unto sin in the Vnregenerate or Vnsanctified man SECT IV. Of that Faculty of the Reasonable Soul which we commonly call Free-will Of the Root and several Branches of it in the Generality What Branches or Portion of this Free-will is in the Man altogether Vnregenerate or in debauched or heinous Sinners CHAP. XXIV Of the Difficulties of the Controversies Concerning Free-Will with the Reasons why They have troubled the Church so long 1. IF we should abstract this Problem from the Difficulties wherewith it may seem to be intangled by the former discourses Concerning our Servitude to Sin and consider it only in its own Nature and Essence this Question alone hath ministred more matter of intricate Disputes The main Point about Free-Will scarce well stated in any Age since the Apostles times then any other Controverted Point in Theologie He that hath leasure skill and opportunity to take an accurate Historical Survey of the the true State or rather of the Instability or ill stated Tenour of this Point since the death of our Saviours Apostles or other Canonical Writers of the New Testament will easily discover that the Disputes about it Pro and Con have been like to a Pair of Scales which never came to any Permanent Stay or constant Settling upon the right Center but have one while wagled this way another while that way The Orthodoxal Truth Concerning this Point as it was taught by our Saviour himself and by his Apostles and maintained by those who did immediately succeed them is That there was no other State or Fatality in Humane Affairs or Events save only This That such as sought after Glory and Immortality by
Flesh or seriously intends this work of Mortification that Habitually or customarily Doth Any of The Works by him mentioned But this Point will come more fitly to be handled in discussing the Second Branch or Member of the First of our Three General Enquiries propounded in the fore part of This Chapter which was Concerning the Extent of this Precept or Duty or how farr we are to Mortifie the Deeds of the Body that we may Live CHAP. XXIX How farre the Duty of Mortification is Universal How farre Indefinite 1. Mortification Vniversal in respect of mens Persons not so in respect of the Duty to be performed THe Question concerning the Extent of this Duty is Twofold First it is to be considered in Respect of the Persons whom this Duty of Mortification concerns Secondly in respect of the Duty it self or matter injoyned Many Propositions there be which are Vniversal in respect of the Persons and but Indefinite in respect of the Thing it Self or matter proposed As contrariwise other Propositions or Precepts there be which are of Vniversal Extent in respect of the matter proposed or Duty injoyned and but Indefinite in respect of the Persons whom they concern In respect of the Matter proposed or Duty injoyned in this Place this Proposition is not Vniversal No man is tied under the strict Penalty of damnation to an Vniversal or Total Mortification of the Flesh Unto a Mortification of all the Deeds of the Flesh Every man is bound But not to a Total Mortification of every Work of the Flesh in respect of All the Degrees of it for so no Flesh should be saved But of the Limitation of this Proposition in respect of the Duty it self we shall have better occasion to speak hereafter In respect of the Persons which are to perform this Duty The Precept is Vniversally and absolutely true of ALL that are indued with Reason and are capable of instruction ALL are bound to MORTIFIE the Deeds of the Flesh without Exception of any mans Person Kings are as strictly bound under pain of Damnation to perform This Duty as the Subjects are and subjects as strictly bound under the same penalty as Magistrates are For God is no accepter of Persons And Gods Will which is the Rule of Faith will not warrant any man of what degree soever to presume upon any Exemption from the Duty it self no not to hope for a Dispensation 2. 'T is a Question well moved by some Schoolmen Ad quid teneatur homo cum primùm venerit ad usum rationis What is the first Duty or Consideration whereunto Every one is tied after he once come to the use of reason Their Answer for the most part is not so pertinent or satisfactory Vid. Victor Relect. 13. pag. 642 c. as the Question is useful ☜ And no place of Scripture affords a fitter Answer to the Question proposed then these words of S. Paul do For seeing as He saith the works of the Flesh are manifest and as we may adde in a manner Evident to Every mans Sense Every one when he first comes to the use of Reason may with more Facility or lesse Observation apprehend the truth and necessity of This Duty then he can do many other Precepts of life which in their rank and order are necessary likewise unto Salvation No point of Belief is more Evident or sensible to the natural man then the Corruption or imperfection of his nature Some meer naturalists such I mean as knew no other Article of Christian Faith have delivered their minds in a manner Orthodoxally concerning this point to wit About The General Deficiency or imperfection of Nature in Man No Christian man which sees thus much but sees withall the Enemies against whom he is to fight and may from Experiments in himself answerable to this Rule of our Apostle perceive a Necessity laid upon him either of killing them or of being killed by them Besides the apprehension of this Necessity which ordinarily inspires Cowards with Valour Every Christian stands ingaged by SOLEMN Vow made in Baptism to undertake this Fight For the First Branch of THAT TRIPLE Vow is To forsake the Devil all his Works the Pomps and Vanities of this wicked World and all the sinful Lusts of the Flesh The duty of Mortification here injoyned consists in the Performance of this Part of our Vow And seeing this is the first Service unto which we are ingaged by that Solemn Vow the Answer to the Question proposed by the School-Men must be this The First Duty whereunto every man is tied when he comes to the use of Reason is the Consideration of this Duty and the undertaking of Christs Battel against the Devil the World and the Flesh The First March or progresse or rather the first Preparation to this Battel is the serious Apprehension of the Necessity of Mortification 3. Howbeit even This Preparation is though not directly or in express Terms yet by necessary Consequence or in Effect denied by the Romish Church and by some others who have professed themselves Members of the present English Church For All they in Effect deny or gainsay the Necessity or Universality of this Duty who teach that Original Sin is utterly taken away or that our Regeneration is instantly and fully wrought by the Sacrament of Baptism That Children rightly Baptized are truly regenerated by the Spirit of God we deny not And in Case being so Baptized they die before they come to the use of Reason or apprehension of This Duty here injoyned yet ought we not to doubt of their Salvation because they have been Baptized and by Baptism made partakers of Regeneration in such a Measure as is requisite and sufficient to their Salvation whilest they are Infants But that Original sin the Lusts of the Flesh or the Old Man should be utterly extinguished or killed in them before their Death we must deny Otherwise we shall Contradict our Apostle in this place and overthrow the Foundation or Ground whereupon this Precept or the Necessity of this Duty is built Now the Ground or Foundation of this Duty is this That All men unto whom this Precept is directed and directed it is to ALL that are Capable of his meaning have sundry deeds of the Flesh sundry Reliques of the Old Man in them And if either Original sin the Reliques of the Old Man or Lusts of the flesh be to be Mortified in All when they first come to the use of Reason they could not be utterly abolished or dead before For to kill or Mortifie that which is already dead or without all sense or motion is impossible 4. Original sin not utterly extinguished by Baptism If Original sin or the Old Man with his members be utterly extinguished in young Infants by Baptism I demand how possibly they could revive in the same Parties after they have put off Infancy or Child-hood or as soon as they come to the use of Reason For these being killed or
Propositions are as we say Hypothetical or Conditional and if either should be denyed or questioned the only Course which the Schools which are the high Courts of Reason for Judging of Arguments afford would be to plead these Categorical or absolute Propositions Whosoever lives after the flesh shall die Whosoever mortifies the Deeds of the body through the Spirit shall live And our Apostle himself ver 6. had premised Two absolute Categoricall Propositions to inferre or prove these two Conditional Propositions in the Text. For so he saith To be Carnally minded is death but to be spiritually minded is life and peace Now albeit he hath added no Quantitie to these Two Categorical Propositions yet in that he saith To be carnally minded is death and To be spiritually minded is life This Infers That Death is the Necessary Consequent of Carnal Living and Life likewise the Infallible Consequent of being spiritually minded All must mortifie though not totally And it is an Infallible Rule of Reason That Any Proposition betwixt whose Parts the Connexion is Necessary is Equivalent to an Universal although it be delivered in Terms Indefinite or without addition of any Quantity So that when our Apostle saith To be carnally minded is death To be spiritually minded is life his Speech is altogether as ful and more Emphatical then if he had said Whosoever lives after the flesh shall die Whosoever through the Spirit mortifies the deeds of the body shall live Howbeit These Two Propositions in the Text thus Reduced to Categoricals and Rendred Vniversal by a Note or Sign of such Quantitie are Vniversal only in Respect of the Persons whom this duty of Mortification concerns Vniversal they are not but Indefinite in Respect of the Duty enjoyned or Matter proposed 2. To find out some more distinct limit or Limitation of them in respect of the Matter proposed The Limitation set out in Three Negatives we are to begin as in the like Cases the Method requires from Negatives The First Negative is this Though all men after they come to years of discretion be necessarily tyed to Mortify the Flesh yet no man is tyed under pain of damnation to an absolute or Total Mortification of it This is Impossible in this life Though sin as the Apostle speaks be the Sting of death and Carnal Intentions be the Arrows or darts of Sathan yet is not every Carnal thought or every degree of minding the flesh so deadly in the issue unto the Soul as the Parthian Arrows were to mens Bodies for they carried death upon their points and gave it possession of every body whose skin they brake Fatumque in sanguine summo est They let Death in at the least breach whereat Bloud could come out But every moment of life led after the flesh doth not thus Necessarily bring forth the death here meant The second Negative is this It is not every Degree or Part of Mortification that will suffice to bring forth the Life here meant For he doth not say if ye have Mortified the deeds of the body but if ye do mortifie the deeds of the Body ye shall live These Two Negatives are as the Two Tropicks betwixt which the Limitation of the former Proposition in respect of the Matter proposed or Duty enjoyned is wholly Situate It is a Positive Mean between them somewhat Lesse then any Absolute or Total Mortification Somewhat More then every Degree or Practise of Mortification yet all this is but Indefinite This Positive Mean betwixt the former Negatives must of necessitie be either some kind of Mortification for Quality more Precious then the Mortification which most men ordinarily affect or practise or some Greater Measure of the same Mortification whereof most men are partakers at some times 3. As Great mens quick Goods are presumed to be of a better kind or breed then the like goods of their poor neighbours for Noble-mens Geese as the Proverb is are Swans So there be some who will have all Qualifications whether of Life or Practise all Acts of Duty or Performances to be of a better kind or rank in the Elect then they are in Others And in these mens Dialect or Divinity the Answer to the proposed Querie were easy and would be This. They which Mortifie the deeds of the body in such sort as the Elect do they certainly shall Live for the Elect do truly mortifie them albeit not in so full a Measure And as Belief so Mortification in Them especially how Little soever it be Points of Election c. are not to determine but to be determined by more general points so it be True will suffice unto salvation But in the Divinity which I have learned the points of Election and Reprobation are to be determined of if at all they may be determined of by the Resolution of other more General and more facile Queries They are preposterously brought to the Determination of any other Difficulties Alwayes the Resolutions of the Generals must be Introductions to the Resolution or clearing of more Special Difficulties Special Difficulties can be no Introduction to the Resotion of General Queries Now this duty of Mortification and the Transgression of it to wit Living after the flesh are far more General then the estate of Election or Reprobation Seeing as I am often forced to repeat it is but a litle Point of mankind a small Portion of men which are partakers of the Word or Sacraments which are for the Present contained under either part of This Division All are not Elect or Reprobate But all live after the flesh or after the Spîrit either in the State of Election or Reprobation But under this Division of Living after the flesh or after the spirit all are comprehended Again in as much as we our selves are all imployed in this Work of Mortification we may have more certain Experiments of our Progress in this Duty then we can have of our estate of Election which is meerly the work of God we have no finger no imployment in it The truth is Only they who have mortified the deeds of the Body in such a measure as our Apostle here requires are in the State of Election Only they who have made up such a measure of sin or Living after the Flesh as induceth the Sentence of death here mentioned are in the absolute State of Reprobation So that the Positive Mean between the two former Negatives must be taken from the measure not from the Specifical Quality or nature of mortification The very Phrase or Character of our Apostle If ye live after the flesh ye shall die but if through the Spirit ye mortifie the deeds of the Body ye shall live Necessarily includes a Perseverance in either kind A Perseverance there must be in this Duty of Mortification before we can have full and perfect Interest in this Promise Without Perseverance or Continuance in this life of the Flesh none are inevitably sentenced unto the death here denounced
against all that live after the Flesh 4. But even Perseverance it self is a Term Indefinite and illimited it admits though not altogether so many determinate degrees or portions as Mortification doth for there must be some set degrees of Mortification before there can be any Perseverance in Mortification yet a great many Degrees or parts And all the degrees of Perseverance are measurable by Continuance of Time Some there be who require a Perseverance in Mortification unto the hour of death before a man can be Infallible Heir of the blessing here promised They say of This the like blessings or Prerogatives or promised as Solon did of Happines or Feliâ—ity Dicique beatus Ante obitum nemo supremáque funera debet No man can be said to be Thus Happy as to be in the assured state of Life untill he hath Persevered in this Duty of Mortification unto death And in this Tenour many of Gods Promises seem to run As when it is said He that continues unto the End he shall be saved c. This Limitation though true is not satisfactory to the Point in Question This Negative is true He that doth not Persevere in this duty of Mortification unto the End of his Life can have no Interest in this promised Life But this being granted it may be further Questioned Whether a man may not have the Gift of Final Perseverance Infallibly collated upon him by the Vertue of this Promise before he come neer to the End of his mortal life Whether some may not have it collated a longer time before some a shorter time some not untill the last day of their life or hour of death 5. A double Inquirie about Perseverance This Point again admits of a Double Inquisition The one De Certitudine Objecti The other De Certitudine Subjecti The One Concerns the Certainty of the Object or Gift of Perseverance it self as whether this Gift be immutably bestowed upon any man before his death The Other concerns the Certainty of our Apprehensions or perswasions that this Gift of Perseverance is or may be bestowed upon us in Particular Or if any man in this life can be thus Certainly perswaded the last Querie is By what Degree or kind of Certainty he can be assured that he shall finally Persevere in this Duty of Mortification or that he shall so Persevere in it as he shall not finally fall from Grace To begin with the First Branch of this Inquiry to wit Whether the Gift of perseverance or Certain Estate in Grace may be infallible or Immutable in this life Our First Proposition shall be this There is a Degree or measure of Mortification best known unto God which may be obtained before the hour of death by some later by others sooner unto which whosoever doth attain he is not only actually instated in this Promise of life but confirmed in Grace and endued with the Gift of Perseverance The Measure is not the same to all Some may be Confirmed in Grace before they attain unto the same height of Mortification which others must Exceed To whom much is given of them much shall be required The second Proposition is This There is a Degree or Measure of living after the Flesh best known unto God which may be made up in this Life by some sooner by others later which measure whosoever doth make up or go beyond it doth hereby become lyable to the Sentence of death hereby denounced and falls into the state of Reprobation The truth of both Propositions may be inferred from the Analogie of Faith or points of Doctrine heretofore delivered concerning the Certainty or continuance of Publick-Weal or Prosperity See his Sermons upon 2 Chr. 6. 39. And upon Jer. 26. 19. preach't before the King and the Certainty or Infallibility of Ruine and Destruction to States and Kingdomes Sauls Kingdome was upon the point of being perpetually Confirmed unto him 1 Sam. 13. 14. but by his Folly and disobedience his own Ruine and utter Deposition of his Line became inevitable and irrevocable The Rule often mentioned in other Treatises was Gener all That Blessings promised to any Nation whilest they were only promised not confirmed by Oath were but Mutable and Conditional and the Promise revocable That Cursings likewise only denounc'd by way of Threat Promises or threats without Oath Revocable under Oath irrevocable not ratified by Oath were but Conditional were Evitable and the Sentence revocable That Plagues or Blessings denounc'd by Oath were Inevitable unpreventable Instances were then given in Saul and in the Children of Israel which were cut off by Oath from entring into the Land of Promise as others were assured by Oath that they should enter into it 6. Now albeit the Interposition of Gods Oath was alwayes an Infallible Argument that The Thing which he did sweare were that matter of Promise or of Threat blessing or cursing was Immutable yet the Interposition of the Oath did not first make mens Estates whether in his Promises or in his Threates to be Immutable but rather declare them to be such Their Estates were the one way or the other Immutable before the Lord did so declave them and Immutable their Estates alwayes became not by any Specifical Qualities of the Duties performed or of the Iniquities committed by them but by the Just measure or full Degrees whether of dutiful Obedience or of disobedience and Transgression The best Argument in this Case we can use must be drawn from the Type unto the Antitype from the Legal Shadow unto the Evangelical Body This kind of Argument our Apostle hath warranted and in a manner fully drawn unto our hands Heb. 3. 7. Wherefore as the Holy Ghost saith to day if you will hear his voice harden not your hearts ver 13. but exhort one another dayly whilst it is called to day i. e. whilst there is time left for repentance lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin for we are made partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the End 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what End doth he mean the End or utmost Period of Life This End may be comprehended under this Phrase which notwithstanding is not necessary to be restrayned unto this End For so the Instances alledged by the Apostle would not Conclude his main Allegation yea they include the Contradictory to this restraint thus much at the least that some of whom he speaks were confirmed in the promise and declared to be so confirmed by Oath others of them were sentenced by Oath unto death without revocation or appeal long before the End of life or approach of death Some when they had heard saith the Apostle did provoke howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses ver 16. Not all that were above twenty years old for Caleb and Joshua being at that time 40 years of Age did enter into the Land of Promise after all the rest which were above twenty
heirs not therefore in the estate of absolute election because they are in the estate of the sons of God or heirs with Christ by Baptism For many whom God hath graciously accepted for his sons many who during the time of their Infancy have enjoyed the estate or Priviledge of the sons of God may in riper years turn Prodigal sons and disinherit themselves and none can be disinherited but he that hath been in the estate or Condition of an Heire or untill with Esau he have sold his birth-right Both parts of this Assertion That all that are Baptized in their Infancy become the Sons of God and during their Infancy do live to God 2. That Sin even in such may revive and wound some grievously others mortally are included in our Apostles dispute Rom. 7. 9. I was once alive saith the Apostle without the Law but when the Commandement came sin revived and I dyed Doth he speak this of himself only or of all men without exception or restraint that were without the Law Not Absolutely of all Men that were without the Law for so the Gentiles which were not under the Law which knew not God nor his Lawes should have been so alive as the Apostle there saith he sometimes was because they were more without the Law then he at any time was Nor doth he speake this of himself alone but of all such as he was That is of all such and only such as were the Seed of Abraham and had been circumcised the 8 th day and by Circumcision became under the Law though for the present without the Law So that as Baptism now so circumcision then did free the Children of Abraham from the curse of the Law did Translate them from the estate or Condition of the Sons of wrath to the Condition or Priviledge of the Sons of God But did the Apostle or his brethren which were made alive by Circumcision in their Infancy continue in the same estate of Life untill their mortal Lives end No The Apostle expresly adds But when the Commandement came sin revived and I dyed So that sin before the Commandement came was dead and revived when the Law came And the Apostle before the same point of time was alive but then dyed When then did the commandement come which by its coming did bring life to sin and death to this our Apostle and such as he was It is an Observation of very good Vse which S. Basil hath to this purpose in his Comment upon the first Psalm See S. Basil's words at the End of this Chapter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 When our Reason comes once to ripeness or perfection That is fulfilled which is written Adveniente mandato revixit Peccatum when the Commandement comes Sin revives For when such as have submitted themselves to the Law of God come to the use of Reason or to take their Estate into Consideration they begin to examine their Consciences by the Law of God and sin which was before Inherent though quiet being called in Question grows desperate and rebellious against the Law by which it is examined against the Judge which condemns it against the Party which calls it in Question The Extract as well of our Apostles speech as of S. Basils Observation upon it confirms the Truth Chap. 29. n. 5. which was before delivered in the Treatise of Mortification That the same measure of Regeneration which sufficeth during the time of Infancy or Childhood sufficeth not to save the same Parties when they come to Use of Reason or Consideration for then the Commandement comes upon us a Commandement to Mortifie the deeds of the Flesh by the Spirit to enter the Lists or Combate with sin reviving in us which will certainly kill us unless we mortifie it as it reviveth in us or quell it as it rebells against us So that the estate or Condition of such as have been baptized after once they come to the use of Reason is an estate different from their estate in their Infancy or Childhood an estate likewise different ordinarily from the Absolute estate of Election But of this estate and of our Christian demeanour in it I shall now only say thus much in Generall This Mortification of the Flesh which our Apostle injoynes Rom. 8. 13. is that Reasonaâ—le Service which the same Apostle requires Rom. 12. 1. I beseech you therefore brethren by the mercies of God that you present your bodies a living sacrifice holy acceptable unto God which is your Reasonable Service But why a Reasonable Service In opposition to the Service of the Law which did consist in the Sacrifice of Buls and Goats and other Reasonless Creatures which yet were offered by the holy men of God in Testification of their Faith or Expectation of the promised Messias This Reasonable Service or Mortification of the Flesh must be performed by us in Testification of our Beliefe that he hath accomplished the Sacrifices of the Law by the Sacrifice of himself Again this sacrifice or offering of Our selves that is of Mortifying our Brutish or unreasonable affections by the Spirit Aurum Thus Myrrham Regique Hominique Deoque says Juvencus an old Poet and Father that lived An. xii 330. is a great deal more acceptable to God then the offerings which the three Kings or Wise men offered unto our Saviour Jesus Christ They offered Gold Myrrhe and Frankincense in testimony or acknowledgement that the child then born was the King of the Jews But in as much as we know that we are not redeemed with silver and gold but with the precious bloud of Christ as of a Lamb without blemish we cannot either Symbolize with the Sacrifice of our High Priest or attain to that live Sympathie with him by the offering of silver gold or any other kind of offering besides the sacrifice of a broken and contrite spirit If as He offred himself by the eternall Spirit to God the Father for us So we again offer up our selves to him by Mortifying our earthly man by the Spirit then his Bloud as the Apostle speaks Heb. 9. 14. shall throughly purge our Consciences from dead works to serve the living God and finally cleanse us from all our sins Unto this Reasonable service or offering up of our selves We were consecrated by Baptism This was a Sermon preacht upon the Epiphanie as I take it and bound by solemn vow then made and if we continue constant in performing this Vow after we come to riper years we shall continue in the state or Condition of the Sons of God which we had by Baptism and by continuance or Progress in this estate we shall arrive at the Immutable state of grace or absolute election For the end of the Son of Gods appearance or manifestation was that he might thus lead us on from strength to strength untill we appear before our God in Sion The Doctrine of Mortification and the consequences thereof were it thus Taught and Laid to the
could have had none in respect of Gods Decree or Ordination if it were true that God had ordained him to eat the Forbidden fruit For the Rule is most certain That God is the Cause and Author of whatsoever he Ordains men to do and hence we read that God hath Ordained us to good works to newness of Life to the performance of all those duties which are commanded But we never read in Scripture and let it never be read in any other Book but with indignation let it never be spoken or thought upon by any Christian but with detestation that God should ordain men to walk in the ways of Cain or to tread in the pathes of ungodliness The Conclusion then is firm and sound That these men here mentioned in St. Jude The conclusion of the first point were not ordained to trouble the Church but ordained and that of old unto that Condemnation which is due to such as trouble the Church or to ungodliness And that is a fearfull condemnation as St. Jude expresseth it ver 13. For to them saith he is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever And if this were reserved unto them or for them they were first ordained unto it the Sentence was already past upon them albeit the Execution be deferred untill the Judgment of the great day But unto this condemnation they were ordained because they had followed the ways of Cain and run greedily after the error of Balaam as St. Iude tels us ver 11. But farre be it from us to think that they were ordained to follow the ways of Cain who was the first troubler of the Church that they might be condemned And thus much of the First point what Condemnation is here meant or unto what they were ordained That was not to trouble the Church but to everlasting torments for troubling the Church by wicked Lives and Lewd Opinions 5. The second Point The Second Generall was What Ordination is here meant or in what manner these men are said to be ordained to this Condemnation Many take it as granted that Ordination to everlasting death is the very same that Reprobation is Yet if this were a time or this a place fitting for discussion of this point it might be easily made to appear that although Reprobation include surely an Ordination to death yet every ordination to death doth not include Reprobation For Ordination to life and Predestination and Ordination to death and Reprobation differ as much as Genus and Species as a Reasonable Creature doth differ from a Sensitive Creature But to let this pass This place of St. Iude is in the opinion of many good Writers Equivalent to that of St. Peter 1. Ep. 2. Cap. 8. ver They stumble at the word being disobedient whereunto also they were Appointed But for that place I suppose he means Mr. Byfield who is far from the Rigidness of some in that point it is ingenuously and discreetly expounded by a late English Writer in his Comments upon that Epistle And it were to be wished that his Exposition were sincerely imbraced by such as had the man in esteem while he lived and are much beholding to his writings especially upon this Epistle since he dyed I shall only now give you notice that the Originall word in this place of S. Jude rendred by ordained is not the same with that in St. Peter That is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and is well rendred Appointed Nor is it the same with that of St. Paul Act. 13. 48. As many as were ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto eternal Life believed S. Judes word here is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is as some render it Praescripti prescribed Of whom it was forewritten to this condemnation But as Beza descripti that is as men designed taxed or proscribed to this condemnation It includes then an Ordinance or somewhat more to witt an Ordinance upon Record but in what Record In Gods everlasting Book of death or may we say that he hath such a Book It is evident that there be more Books then One out of which men shall be Judged at the last day according to their works The 2. General subdivided as St. Iohn tells us Rev. 20. 12. The Points then Remaining to be discussed are Two First In what Sense these men are said to be fore-ordained to everlasting death or in what Sense men are said to be Reprobated from everlasting or from Eternity The Second Whether our Apostle in this place did expresly and punctually mean Gods eternal Decree of reprobation or some other ordination to death 6. In handling the first Point I shall only explicate that which I haue elsewhere delivered See the 37. Chap. to wit That albeit whosoever is reprobated is reprobated from eternity yet no man at the time of his Baptism is a Reprobate Numb 16. and Pharaohs hardning few or none are born in that estate or condition but such as finally perish do fall into it The Case may be made clear by divers Instances wherein men even by humane Lawes may be sentenced to death or other punishment before they be born and yet at the time of their birth or within some few days before their death or punishment be no more lyable to the Sentence of the Law then other men are For unto death or other grievous punishment there is required for the most part as well the Sentence of the Judge as the Sentence of the Rule or Law And yet in some peculiar Cases no more is required then the Sentence of the Law or Rule Sententia Judicis Sententia Juris which was made and given many hundreds of years before the Party was born which is sentenced by it Every one that committeth murther is lyable to death by the Law But besides the Sentence of the Law or the Rule which is Generall to all there is required the Sentence of the Judge to apply the Law to this Particular and before he give sentence there is further required a Formal Processe not only for proof of the Fact it self but of the Quality of it And untill this Processe be observed the Judge himself may not give Sentence although he himself saw the the Fact committed Nor may the Party be executed or put to death by any untill the Judge have given Sentence He is condemnable before the Jurie passe upon him but not condemned when the Jury finds him guilty untill the Judge passe sentence upon him But if a private man shall take up Arms against his Soveraign Lord or the state wherein he lives he is rebellious Ipso Iure he is a Rebell by Law there needs no other Tryall or Formal Processe besides the Evidence of the Fact The Martial or General is only to put the Law in Execution and the Party thus rebelling is sentenced to death by the Law which was in force many hundreds of years before the party offending was born who not withstanding is not lyable to
this Sentence of death till he commit the Fact at which the Law doth immediately strike not at his Person Again there is ordinarily required to Excommunication not only Sententia Iuris but Sententia Iudicis Though the Canon by which he is Excommunicated were made Long before yet he that offends against the Canon is not forthwith Excommunicated by it until he be refractory or Contumacious The Judge may admonish before he give Sentence without his sentence judicially given the party is not excoÌ„municated by the Law But some peculiar Cases there be wherein a man may stand Immediatly Excommunicated by the law or Canon without the sentence of the Judg there is no place left for Admonition or recanting The Fact being once proved either by witnesses or by its own Evidence the Judge hath no more to do but to read the Canon and to pronounce that the party hath fallen upon it So that he is said to be excommunicated by the Law or Canon which was made perhaps a thousand years before he was born yet not born an excommunicate person or in the State of excommunication into this estate he falls by doing some Fact or other at which the Rule or Canon doth immediately strike without further Processe or Conviction Now in as much as the Sentence was given before he was born it cannot be denyed but that he was excommunicated before he was born and yet had not been excommunicated at all unlesse he had done that Fact which requireth Excommunication by the Law 7. Some Founders of Colledges appoint a Process or Formal proceeding against Offenders even in grosser Crimes as for Adultery Murther manifest Perjury or the like before any man can be expelled for these and the like Crimes Such as they appoint Judges must give Sentence Viva voce upon the examination not of the Fact only but of the Quality of the Fact as whether it be Scandalous in so high a degree as deserves Amotion without further Admonition or expectation of amendment And every one that is in these Cases amoved or expelled is expelled by his present Judges not immediatly by his Founder or his Statutes though the Judges must proceed according to their intent or meaning But in case any of the same society the very Governours themselves should obtain a Licence or Dispensation for their Oath there needs no sentence of any Judge there is no place for Admonition or Traverse because the Founders themselves even when they made these Lawes and statutes inflicted these punishments upon all such as in this kind transgress their statutes Now upon whomsoever the Founder of any Society which dyed some two or three hundred years agoe did inflict the punishment of Expulsion by vertue of this present Statute he did inflict it before the party offending was born and yet this punishment had not at all fallen upon him unless he had committed that Fact which the Founder in his life time did thus severely censure whensoever it should by any of his Society be committed See the Note at the end of this Chapter Now in this case we may truly say that the party thus offending doth * expell himself by committing that Fact for which he was expelled by his Founder The Founder then expels him before he was born without any respect unto his Person â—or no Lawgiver makes any Decree or Law against any mans Person but against mens Misdemeanours but the party cannot be said to expell himself before he doth dash against the inflexible Law or statute 8. And if no Law-giver on earth how partial soever make any Capital Decrees against any mans person Far be it from us to think that the Eternall Law-giver who is himself the Everliving Rule of Justice and Equity should sentence any mans Person to everlasting death albeit whosoever is sentenced to everlasting death be so sentenced from Eternity because God himself who is Eternal is the very Rule or Law a Law or Rule inflexible which cannot alter and yet rewards every man according to all his wayes and works not according to his Person or Individual Nature Whosoever then is reprobated by God is Reprobated by him before he be born even from Eternity and yet no man Baptized is born a Reprobate or becomes so untill he reprobate himself by committing those sins or rather that measure of sin unto which the Eternall Law-giver did before all Times award finall exclusion from the Benefits of Christs Death and Passion Now unto such ungodly men as St. Iude here speaks of this Award was allotted from Eternity thus they were ordained to Condemnation But their Persons were not created or made to ungodlinesse Taking them as now they are there was a Necessity from Eternity that they should perish but there was No necessity from eternity that they should be such ungodly men as now they are This necessity did accrue in time they wilfully and freely brought it upon themselves Thus much of the First Part of the Second General to wit In what sense it is true That whosoever is reprobated or ordained to everlasting death in time was so reprobated or ordained from Eternity The meaning is that the Law or Rule by which he is reprobated or ordained to death hath no beginning of Date it was unchangably set from Eternity Yet was this Law or rule an Immanent Act that is conteined in him only who is Eternal it dit did not produce any Reall effect answerable unto it either for the creature before he was made or in the creature after he was made until he have made up that measure of Sin unto which everlasting death was by this Eternal living Rule awarded But the measure of sinne being made up then as the Lawyers speak Indicium transit in rem judicatam that is the eternall Law or sentence produceth a Transient Effect in the Creature so qualified and that is an Ordination Passive the beginning of that death which shall have no end 9. The Second Part of the Second General Second part of the second General which was the last Doctrinal point was Whether St. Iude in this place be to be understood of Gods eternal design or Ordination unto death or of some written Ordination or Ruled Case which did as truly fit these men taking them as now they are as it did other ungodly persons of old against whom the Sentence of Condemnation here meant was denounced or declared by other of Gods Embassadours That these ungodly men here in S. Jude were Fore-ordained to this condemnation the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth literally and clearly evince but whether this Fore-ordination were in S. Iudes intent or meaning a Fore-ordination from Eternity the literall importance of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of old doth make it questionable or rather puts it out of question that he did not so mean For it is an Adverb of Time and never reaches to my observation so farre as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉
was now by Gods decree irrevocable I have heard of a Malepert Courtier who being rated of his Soveraign Lord for committing the third murther after he had been graciously pardoned for two made this saucy Reply One man indeed I killed and if the Law might have had its course that had been all For the death of the second and of the third your Highness is to answer God and the Law Our Apostle being better acquainted then we are with the forementioned Circumstances of time and with the manner of Pharaohs hardening foresaw the malepert Jew or Hypocrite especially when Pharaohs Case came in a manner to be their own would make this or the like saucie Answer to God If Pharaoh after the time wherein by the ordinary course of justice he was to dye were by Gods special appointment not only reprived but suffered to be more out-ragious than before yea imboldened to contemn Gods Messengers the ensuing evils committed by him and the miseries which by his stubbornness befall the Egyptians may seem to be more justly imputed unto God than unto him at least the former expostulation might seem now altogether unseasonable 9. The Apostles first Answer to the former Objection explicated To this Objection our Apostle opposeth a two-fold Answer First he checks the sauciness of the Replicant Nay but O man who art thou 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 qui Deo respondes saith the Vulgar Beza as he thinks more fully qui responsas Deo our English better than both that replyest against God The just and natural Value of the Original doubly compounded word will best appear from the circumstances specified First God by Moses admonisheth Pharaoh to let his people go But he refuseth Then God expostulateth with him As yet exaltest thou thy self against my people that thou wilt not them go The Objection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 made by the Hypocrite is as a Rejoynder upon Gods Reply to Pharaoh for his wonted stubbornness or as an Answer made on his behalf or others in his Case unto the former Expostulations For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Respondenti respondere to Rejoyn upon a Reply or Answer Now this Rejoynder to speak according to the Rules of modestie and good manners was too saucie out of what mans mouth soever it had proceeded For what is man in respect of God any better than an artificial body in respect of the Artificer that makes it or then an earthen vessel in respect of the Potter Now if we might imagine a base vessel could speak as Fables suppose beasts in old time did and thus expostulate with the Potter When I was spoiled in the making why didst thou rather reserve me to such base and ignominious uses than throw me away especially when others of the same lump are fitted for commendable uses it would deserve to be appointed yet to more base or homely uses For a By-stander that had no skill in this facultie for the Potters Boy or Apprentise thus to expostulate on the Vessels behalf with his father or Master would argue ignorance and indiscretion The Potter at least would take so much authority on him as to reply I will appoint every vessel to what use I think fit not to such use as every idle fellow or malepert Boy would have it appointed Now all that our Apostle in this similitude intends is that we must attribute more unto the Creators skill and wisdom in dispensing mercy and judgment or in preparing vessels of wrath and vessels of honour than we do unto the Potters judgment in discerning clay or fitting every part of his matter to it 's right and most commodious use Yet in all these The Potter is judge saith the Author of the Book of Wisdom Wisdom 15. 7 That very vessel which ministred the matter of this similitude to our Apostle Jer. 18. 4. was so marred in the Potters hand as he was inforced to fashion it again to another use than it was first intended for That it marred in the first making was the fault of the clay So to fashion it anew as neither stuffe nor former labour should be altogether lost was the Potters skill And shall we think our Apostle did intend any other Inference from this Similitude then the Prophet from whom he borrowes it had made to his hand O house of Israel cannot I do with you as this Potter saith the Lord Behold as the clay is in the potters hand so are ye in mine hand O house of Israel Jer. 18. 6. 10. The true and full Implication is thus much and no more Albeit God sought to prepare them to glorie yet had they a possibilitie or libertie utterly to spoile themselves in the making Howbeit if so they did he was able to form them again to an end quite contrary unto that whereto he first intended them So the Prophet explicates himself vers 9 10. And here we must request our Reader alwaies to remember that the Apostle compares God not to a Phrantick or Phantastick Potter delighted to play tricks to his losse as to make a vessel scarce worth a grâ—at of that piece which with the same ease and cost might be made worth a shilling only to shew his Imperial Authoritie over a piece of clay He Imagineth such a Potter as the Wise man did that knowes a reason why he makes one vessel of this fashion another of that why he appoints this to a base use that to a better albeit an unskilful By-stander could perhaps discern no difference in the stuff or matter whereof they are made The summe then of our Apostles intended Inference is this As it is an unmannerly point for any man to contest or wrangle with a skilfull Artificer in his own facultie of whom he should rather desire to learn with submission so it is damnable presumption for any creature to dispute with his Creator in matters of Providence or of the worlds regiment or to debate his own case with him thus Seeing all of us were made of the same Masse I might have been graced as others have been with wealth with honour with strength with wisdom unless thou hadst been more favourable to them then to me Yet that which must quell all inclination to such secret murmurings or presumptuous debates is it our stedfast Belief of his Omnipotent Power or absolute Will No but of his infinite Wisdom Equitie and Mercie by which he disposeth all things even mens infirmities or greatest crosses to a better end in respect of them so they will patiently submit their wils to his than they could hope by any other meanes to atchieve 11. In what sense Gods Will is said to be the absoulte infallible Rule of equitie or justice Gods Will to have mercie on some and to harden others or howsoever otherwise to deal with men is in this sense most absolute Whatsoever we certainly know to be willed by him we must acknowledge without examination to be truly good Whomsoever we assuredly believe
And in this sense that of St. Ambrose with whose Expressions of this Mysterie many in our times have been altogether causelesly much offended when thou hadest overcome the sharpness of death thou didest open the kingdom of heaven to all Believers ought to be taken Nothing can be more plain or more Concludently proved from our Saviours own words and his Apostles Comments on them than this That The Kingdom of Heaven it self was not Erected was not established untill that Jesus whom the Jews had Crucifyed was made both Lord and Christ and placed as Man at the Right Hand of his Father 3. To dilate further upon this Point for this Present I dare not lest I should lose my way or forget to return to the other Parallel proposed to wit What heavenly Mansion or Sanctuary the first Part of the earthly Tabernacle or Court whereinto the ordinary Priests went every day did represent or foreshaddow I shall not trespass against any Article of Faith or Rule of interpreting Scriptures nor I hope offend any ingenuous Conscience by delivering my Opinion in a Point wherein the Scripture as I conceive is silent or which can neither be enforced upon Us as any part of Christian Belief nor be refuted by any Rule of Faith To my apprehension of our Apostles meaning Heb. 8. ver 5. That place or Mansion in the heavenly Tabernacle wherein Abraham Lazarus c. did rest before The Kingdom of heaven was set open to all Beleivers was That Place or Court which Atrium Sacerdotum the Court of the Priests in the first Tabernacle or in Salomons Temple did Picture out unto us Or if the soules of the Faithful were not admitted into That Place before Christs death we cannot allot a Lower or Outermer Mansion in heaven it self than that which Atrium Congregation is that is the Court of the Congregation in Salomons Temple whereinto the Congregation of Israel which were no Priests were admitted and taught by the Priests did represent However it be That heavenly Mansion or Sanctuary which in proportion truly answered to the Sanctuary or Court of Priests in the material Temple was no such happy Seat of Bliss before Christs Death as it was made by it For by his Bloud it was finally Consecrated or dedicated to be what now it is a True Temple which was the Second Parallel proposed CHAP. XLVI A Parallel betwixt the Rites of Dedicating the Tabernacle the Vessels c. with Bloud of Beasts And of Consecrating the Heavenly Places with the most Precious Blood of Jesus Christ 1. THe Place or Station for drawing this Parallel aright is Hebr. 9. Neither was the first Testament dedicated without Bloud For when Moses had spoken every Praecept to all the People according to the Law he took the bloud of Calves and of Goates with water and Scarlet wooll and Hyssop and sprinkled both the Book and all the people saying This is the bloud of the Testament which God hath enjoined unto you Moreover he sprinkled with bloud both the Tabernacâ— and all the vessels of the Ministerie And almost all things are by the Law purged with Bloud and without shedding of bloud is no Remission Ver. 18 19 20 21 22. All this he speakes according to the plain Litteral Sense of the Law concerning the Purifying or Consecrating of the Earthly Tabernacle with its Vessels or Implements The Mystical Sense or meaning of the Matters of Fact or Practises performed by Moses and Aaron when they consecrated the first Tabernacle with the bloud of Bullocks and Goates c. is litterally explained unto us by this our Apostle in the verses following It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purifyed with these but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these ver 23. These words admit no Metaphors or Tropes but have their proper and Real Logical Sense The Argument is most punctually Concludent The Similitude or paterns of heavenly things were purified with bloud therefore the heavenly things themselves that is the Caelestial Tabernacles were to be purged and consecrated with the bloud of Christ our high Priest which is now entred into them for our Sanctification and final Redemption To inquire what should become of all our Saviours bloud whether shed in his Agonie or upon the Cross will seem I know A Curious Question specially to slothful Students in Divinitie On the otherside it would argue a drowsie Fancie either voluntarily to imagine or to be by others perswaded That his most Precious bloud being shed in such abundance should be like water spilt upon the ground either swallowed up by the dry earth or mingled with dust or dispersed by the heat of the Sun and resolved into vapours Seeing every drop of it was truly The bloud of God It can be no Sin to suppose nay to believe that All of it was by his death made as his Body now is Immortal that All of it was preserved entire and sincere and brought either by his own immediate power or by the Ministery of his holy Angels into those heavenly Sanctuaries which were to be CONSECRATED by it to be the Seats or Mansions of everlasting bliss unto all true Believers and thus brought in at the time of his Entrance into Paradise in soule though not in Body which was immediately after he had commended his Spirit unto his heavenly Father 2. If unto all that hath been said in this Argument I should further adde That the most precious bloud of the Son of God which was shed for the Ransom of our Sins in the Garden or upon the Cross and brought into the Celestial Tabernacle upon his death whether reunited to his Glorified Body or glorified in it self and preserved apart from his body doth still retain an everlasting Efficacy for the daily Purifying of our hearts and working Sanctification in us I presume the Intelligent or ingenuous Reader will interpret this Assertion rather for a Point of speculation not much thought upon by others than any Paradox or Heterodoxal Doctrine of my own Invention But of the true Vertual presence or Real Operation of the Body and Bloud of our Lord Jesus Christ upon our Soules in so great distance as is between the most high and most holy Celestial Sanctuary and these material Temples here on earth wherein we Celebrate and Solemnize the memorie of his Death and passion more punctually and more fully if God shall be pleased to give leave In the 11. Book hereafter All which I have here affirmed or intimated will uncontrollably follow from our Apostles Doctrine in this Epistle and from other Passages of his Fellow Apostles To begin with that of Heb. 9. 11 c. Christ being come an High Priest of good things to come by a greater and more perfect Tabernacle not made with hands that is to say not of this building neither by the bloud of Goates and Calves but by his own bloud he entred in once into the holy place
by his Blood were the Deliverance of mankind from the powers of darkness and the inheritance of the kingdom of Light 4. The Parallel between the Institution of the Passover and of the Lords Supper or of the two Inheritances bequeathed the one by Moses the other by Christ is so plain that it needs no Comment It only requires a diligent Reader or Hearer or what is wanting on the ordinary Hearers part may be supplied by every ordinary Catechist before the receiving of the Sacramental Pledges One point yet remaines more pertinent to the unfolding of our Apostles meaning Heb. 9. ver 15. And for this cause he is the Mediator of the new Testament that by meanes of death for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the First Testament they which are called might receive the promise of Eternal Inheritance For where a Testament is there must also of necessitie be the death of the Testator For a Testament is of force after men are dead otherwise it is of no strength at all while the Testator liveth And it is this As the Israelites did not enter upon the inheritance or take possession of the Land of Canaan till after Moses the Testator or Mediator of the old Testament was dead so neither was the Kingdom of Heaven our everlasting inheritance set open to all or any Beleivers until Christ Jesus the Testator or Mediator of the new Testament was crucified dead buried and raysed again to immortal Glorie Since which time as is the King so is the Kingdom or inheritance bequeathed so is the Testament it self being sealed by his bloody death All and every of them Truely Everlasting CHAP. XLVIII The Parallel between the most Solemn Services of the Law and The One Sacrifice of Christ And The high praeeminence and efficacie of This in comparison of Those The Romanists Doctrin that in the Masse Christs Body is Identically Carnally present and that there is a proper Sacrifice Propitiatorie offered derogates from the Absolute Perfection of Christs offering himself Once for all 1. THe principal Termes of proportion in this Parallel which serve as so many several Kens or Markes for the right survaying of it are The services of the Law or the Offices of Legal Priests and the Perpetual Function of our High Priest The services of the Law wherein our Apostle instanceth are the Principal and most Solemn Sacrifices which were injoyned to the Priests after the order of Aaron The One Sort whereof were Anniversaries as of Bullockes and Goates and to be offered every year upon the day of Attonement and so to be offered from the First Erection of the Tabernacle in the wilderness so long as the Law of Ceremonies was de Jure to continue untill our Saviours death upon the Cross since which time all Bloody Sacrifice have lost their Legal Vse The Other service was That Sacrifice of the Red Heifer and the Consecration of water by the sprinkling or mingling her Ashes which perhaps was not Anniversarie nor often put in practice from the time of Moses his Death untill the Ascension of our Saviour into heaven Now our Apostle takes it as granted that if these choice Sacrifices of Attonment and of the Red Cow were altogether unsufficient to purifie the Hearts and Consciences or the Soules and Spirits of sinful men the Ordinary or meaner sacrifices of the Law were much more unsufficient to all such purposes as the Sacrifices of our high Priest was Alsufficient to all such purposes as the Sacrifice of our high Priest was Alsufficient and most Efficacious for The Eminency of Christs bloudie Sacrifice upon the Cross in respect of all Legal sacrifices of what rank soever consisteth First in the Efficacy which it had and hath for Remission of all sins committed against the Moral Law of God that is of all such sins as immediately pollute the reasonable Soul and Conscience The least degree of such Purification no Legal Sacrifices could immediatly effect reach or touch To what Use then did they directly serve or what was the proper Effect unto which they were immediately terminated That was the Purification of mens Bodyes from meere Legal uncleannesse that is from all such negligences Ignorances or Casual Occurrences as not being expiated by the Priest did exclude the parties so offending from the Tabernacle of the Congregation Or as our Apostle speakes to Purifie them from such uncleannesses of the flesh as did but foreshadow or picture the uncleanness of the soul or the dead works of sinne All which being not expiated by a more excellent Priest then any was after the order of Aaron will exclude all from entring into the heavenly Tabernacle 2. Such Legal uncleannesse as did exclude the Parties polluted with it from the Tabernacle of the Congregation was many waies contracted as by touching of the dead by eating of Meats forbidden by the Law or by not eating meates allowed of by the Law according to the Rule or Prescript for such Ceremonial Services or by the like Omissions or Practises which were not in their own nature or to all men sinful but sinful in the Seed of Jacob only to whom they were Evill only because forbidden not forbidden because they were evill in their own nature Even in regard of such shadows or Typical Offices for Purifying men Legally unclean the best and most solemn Sacrifices of the Law though offered once at least every year and otherwise as often as dayly Occasions or Occurrences did require were no way so efficacious or Effectual as the One Sacrifice of the Son of God offered by himself but Once for all is for the perpetual Purifying of our Soules from the Dead works of sin and for our Consecration to the everlasting service of the everliving God which is that Freedom indeed wherewith his only Son hath promised to set all such Free as Believe in his Name and Abide in his word John 8. 3. The Eminencie of Christs Priesthood and Sacrifice above the Priesthood and Services of the Law is deeply wronged by the Doctrine and Practise of Secular and Regular Roman-Catholick Priests as they do term themselves and so is our Apostles Doctrine in the ninth and tenth Chapters to the Hebrews more peremptorily contradicted by them then it was by the Incredulous or unbelieving Jews in his life time The Western Anti-Christ so the Lutherans distinguish them hath in this particular so farr out-bid the Antichrist of the East that if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Law-opposer or man of sin were to be followed close with Howant-Cry or his Footsteps to be traced for these nine hundred years by the Christian Kingdoms or States the Chase and Cry would sooner fall into Rome or Trent then into Constantinople though That no question be now the seat of Gog and Magog or of the Eastern Antichrist That Contradiction of Sinners which our Saviour Christ did indure here on Earth Heb. 12. 3. improved by the Roman Church in later dayes against all such as
Justification One By Christ's Death Another By his Resurrection from the Dead or Two Imputations of his Rightcousness Surely neither Justification nor Imputation of Christs Righteousness Consists in One Single Act both admitt divers Degrees or Parts or rather contain a Long Processe The best way to assoyl the Difficultie proposed will be First to set forth the proper effects or Duties of our Beliefe as it is terminated to Christs Death and Sufferings Secondly the Proper Issues or Effects of our Beleife of his Resurrection from the Dead We believe that by his Death our sins even the sins of the world were taken away That Adam and All that came of Him were thus farre redeemed by Him as to be set Free deâ— Jure from the Bondage of Satan and purchased as a peculiar people to himself Thus we often read that we are redeemed by his blood shed on the Cress that is By that One Sacrifice of Himself the Ransom of Mankinds Redemption was fully payd Of this all men are bound to have full Assurance and in respect of this General t is truely said Fides est Fiducia Faith is a Confidence in the Blood of Christ And thus firmely Believing our Faith is imputed or reckoned to Us for Righteousness as it was to Abraham 2. But many may be Redeemed from Captivitie yet have a desire to continue in the Land or Territories of their former Captivitie or no great desire to be transported out of it into a safer soyl Some with Gryllus in the Poet desire rather to continue Swine then to be Re-transformed into the Image of God And unto These Christs Death is not available shall not be imputed unless it be to their greater Condemnation But from the General Confidence that Christ hath redeemed us from the bondage of Satan and Curse of the Law the Church our Mother hath wisely and piously ordained that all professing Christianitie yea Infants born of Christian Parents or Others exposed by their incredulous Parents to the Tuition of the Church shall be forthwith transported out of the Hemisphere of darkness into the Sphere of Light to be visibly ingrafted into the mystical Body of Christ The Duty whereto all such as are thus transported are bound is to promise and Vow Obedience unto Christ as to their sole Lord and Redeemer To forsake the Divel and all his workes the pompes and vanities of this wicked world and all the sinfull lusts of the flesh and to fight manfully under Christs Banner unto their lives end that is to take up their Cross and follow him and as he dyed for them so to be ready to lay down their lives for the brethren if need require in his service or to use our Apostles words Phil. 2. 5. To put on the same mind which was in Christ Jesus who being in the form of God thought it no robbery to be equal with God but made himself of no reputation and took upon him the form of a servant and was made in likeness of men and being found in fashion of a man he humbled himself and became obedient unto death even the Death of the Cross Vers 6 7 8. Another not altogether so diverse as rather the same immediate and formal Effect of our Belief in Christs bloody Sacrifice on the Cross is Dayly to offer up the sacrifice of a broken Heart of an humble and contrite spirit And for offering this Sacrifice every man must in part be his own Priest and Confessor that he may be partaker of the blessing and Grace of the High Priest of our soules from his Heavenly Sanctuary where he sits at the right hand of God CHAP. LIII Christs Parable 12. Math. 43. c. applyed Two degrees of Reconciliation the first Active or but meere-Grammatically Passive The other Real-Passive So correspondently Two Branches of Justification The One from Christs Death The Other from the benefit of His Priesthood dayly participated to us 1. TO proceed thus farr in the Knowledge of Jesus Christ and of Him Crucified and in the practice of Christian Duties Concomitant to such Knowledge is more I am afraid or rather fully perswaded then most of such as take upon them to seal Assurance to themselves and to others of their salvation by Markes and Tokens of the Elect of their own coyning have rightly got by Heart And yet to rest secure upon these Grounds though learned by heart of their personal Salvation or irreversible Estate in Grace or in Gods Favour doth open a gap unto hellish Hypocrisie which our Saviour himself hath commanded us to beware of or rather to shut it out as it is in that parable Mat. 12. 43 44 45. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man he walketh through dry places seeking rest and findeth none Then he saith I will return into my house from whence I came Out and when he is come he findeth it empty swept and garnished Then goeth he and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked then himself and they enter in and dwell there and the last state of that man is worse then the first Even so shall it be also to this wicked generation For the right application of this Parable to the Jews with whom our Saviour there disputes as also unto men of this and former Ages I referr the Reader to Jansenius and Maldonate in their Learned Comments upon this place but especially to Jansenius 2. Thus much is sufficient to our present purpose and thus much is most cleare That it is not the Sweeping or garnishing of the heart or emptiness of such vices as do raign in the hearts of Infidels and give Satan possession of them all which may be wrought by the serious consideration of Christs death Passion and by the imputation of his Merits that can secure us from further assaults of Satan to our final destruction Rather for us to presume upon these without Experiments without a continual Guard upon our own soules is but as if a man having beaten his adversaries out of his house should set up his staffe or sword or other instrument of warre without the door to entice his enemie by this opportunitie to make forcible entrance when he is least aware To what End then doth the Contemplation of Christs death or the Imputation of his merits serve us Do these beget no portion or degree of any Certaintie of our Estate in Christ or of Salvation Yes they alwaies bring forth a Certainty though not of Faith yet of Hope that God in his Good time will accomplish these good beginnings and crown them with more then a Moral with an Experimental certainty or assurance of our Estate in Grace For Regulating our perswasions in this point there can be no better Rule then that of our Apostle Rom. 5. Therefore being justified by faith we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ by whom also we have access by Faith into his Grace wherein we stand and rejoyce in hope of the Glorie
work and Labour of Love which ye have shewed towards his Name in that ye have ministred to the Saints and dâ—minister Had it been any injustice in God to have forgotten their former works if it had their works were truly meritorious or capable of reward by plea of justice For that work unto which reward without injustice cannot be denyed is meritorious or worthy of the reward yet the Apostle implies that God should have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unjust If he had so utterly excluded these Hebrews from entring into his Rest as he did their Forefathers from entring into the land of Promise For albeit their later works had been much like their forefathers yet their former works had been much better But in what sense doth the Apostle say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God is not unjust 7. This word Injustus is sometimes no more than non benignus or non misericors that is See Book 9. Ch. 12. Numb 3. not bountiful or not merciful to such as are in miserie Though works of pitie of bountie be not works of justice or equitie yet sometimes he that shewes pitie or favour though in Cases wherein the positive Law of God requireth Justice or severe execution if the case come before the Magistrate is said to deal justly that is not rigorously not hardly So the Holy Ghost when he gives the reason why Joseph did not seek publickly to be divorced from his espoused wife THE BLESSED VIRGIN saith he did thus resolve because he was A Just Man that is a Courteous and mild-hearted man Not a just man according to strict and Legal justice For by the positive Law of God the crime which he suspected was punishable not with divorce only but with death If Joseph then in resolving to put away his espoused wife privately did the part of a just and upright man he had been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an unjust man in our Apostles sense if he had resolved to use the remedie or benefit of the Law Yet can no man be said strictly or properly to be unjust for using any lawful remedie but non benignus or non mitis he may be said to deal rigorously or hardly or uncourteously in using the extremitie of the Law To apply this Distinction to the Point in question If God had excluded these Hebrewes from entring into his Rest after they had accomplished such a measure of works as the Apostle there intimates he had not been so merciful and bountiful unto them as the Scripture teacheth he is to all he had not shewed himself so gratious a Lord nor given such incouragements to his other servants of not being wearie of weldoing as he alwaies useth to do Briefly when the Apostle saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Phrase in the Original is as much as if he had said so farr is God from being unjust that you shall find him a most gratious and Loving Father so farr will he be from forgetting your works and labour of Love so farr from cutting you off from entring into his Rest that he will remember you with his best blessings even with the blessing of Salvation however your late backslidings have deserved the contrary But however God be a Gratious and loving Father to all that call upon him to all that are within his Covenant but especially to his Elect albeit this his Gratiousness consists in the not imputing or in remitting of their sinnes yet is there not the least sinne which any within his Covenant or which any of his Elect do commit whose Pardon must not be sought for after the Commission of it and must actually be obteined otherwise they should dye in their sinnes for though the Son of God did take away the sinnes of the whole world by his sufferings upon the Crosse yet were no mans sinnes so taken away by him or so dissolv'd as that he from that time did cease or yet doth cease to dissolve them whensoever they are committed and their dissolution by repentance sought for Unlesse he did yet dissolve the works of the Divel in us unlesse he did yet in peculiar manner remit sinnes even our pettie sinnes would inchain us unto the servitude of Satan St. Jâ—hn no way excludes the Elect but speakes to men regenerate albeit not to them alone when he saith If any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous 1 John 2. 1. Now the Office of an Advocate is to plead his Clients Cause before his Judge as either for Justice if his Cause be good or for mercy or mitigation of Justice if his Client be delinquent God we know is as well a God of Justice as of mercy and hath as well one ear open to the Accusations which are brought against us as another attentive to the Intercessions which are made for us Satan is our professed Adversarie and after he hath inticed us to do his work he never ceaseth to sollicit the Execution of Gods Justice or vengeance upon us Not the best of Gods Saints may at any time plead their own cause or ioyn this Issue with him Lord Let Justice be awarded with speed either for us or against us either let our Adversarie be condemned for accusing us falsely or let us be condemned with him if we have done unjustly This were to become not our own Advocates which yet were presumption but to turn Satans Sollicitors even to suplicate for wo and vengeance upon our own soules David hath taught us the Form of our Plea with God even whilest we stand upon best termes Lord enter not into Judgement with this thy servant for no flesh is righteous in thy sight 9. But will the Almighty Judge of all the world be so unmindfull of his Great Attribute as to deny Execution of Judgement upon such as have deserved it being thereunto sollicited and importuned by his professed Adversarie or will The Son of God be so Partial as to plead for their acquittal which confess themselves Guiltie of the Crimes Objected To this we Answer 1. God hath Two Covenants One of Justice Another of Mercy And albeit God The Father should do us no wrong no injustice but do Himself right if he did upon Every accusation instantly Condemn us yet seeing His Onely Son hath by a full and alsufficient price purchased a Reconciliation for us He may maintaine the plea of Justice even before the Almighty Judge against our Adversarie for us Or haveing satisfied the Justice of God for all the sinnes of mankinde He may Remove our Tryal from the Barre of Justice to the Throne of Grace and mercy 2. Neither God the Father could deny Execution of Justice upon us nor could God the Son plead so much as for our Reprival if we should stand upon our own integritie or our own Justification so that Our Confession of Guilt is so farre from doing us preiudice that it is a most necessary Condition of our Acquittal If God the Father