1.15 Another Answer to the Question may be that Christ hath not made by his death full satisfaction to the justice of God for mens sins upon any such terms as either to indulge or harden any man in the practise of sin by securing him from the stroak of Gods displeasure when he offendeth nor yet to deprive God of his Liberty to govern the World or particularly his own house the houshold of Faith in wisdome righteousness and equity and consequently to judge and punish delinquents in either when he seeth just cause but the compleatness or fulness of this Satisfaction standeth in this that God may in consideration thereof without the least reflection upon or disparagement unto his justice or perfect hatred of sin forgive all men all their sins upon their unfeigned Faith and Repentance notwithstanding he may in some cases as in that of David 2 Sam. 12. ver 13 14. upon another account as viz. for the vindication of his righteousness and impartialitie in the Government of the world before the men thereof correct with temporal chastisements great and known Offenders the truth of their Faith and Repentance notwithstanding Quest 17. How long did Christ remain in the state of death Answ By the space of three daies and three nights Mat. 12.40 that is of one whole natural day in the middle and part of two other of these dayes Now a natural day consisting of 24 hours and so comprehending the night in it our Saviour by the figure Synecdoche expresseth two parts of two of these dayes and one intire one by three daies and three nights So that he reckoneth that part of the sixth day of the week on which he was crucified which we call Friday which remained after his being crucified dead and laid in the grave being between three and four of the clock in the afternoon unto the end of it this part I say of this natural day he reckoneth for the first of the three daies and three nights of which he speaketh The seventh day of the week called Saturday the whole time whereof he remained in the state of death and in the grave he accounteth for the second That part of the first day of the week by us called the Lords day or Sunday which was before his resurrection he computeth for the third and last of these three daies and three nights Quest 18. Why did Christ remain thus long viz. three daies and three nights in the sense declared in the hand or state of death Answ Because God judged this a sufficient time to evince and prove the truth and certainty of his death for the full satisfaction of those whom it concerned to believe it some having been thought to be dead for several hours together who yet were not dead but in a trance only Quest 19. Why did he remain no longer in the state of death but only for three daies and three nights Answ First because by this time as was even now said he had sufficiently confirmed the truth of his death by which he had wrought the great work of Redemption and made attonement for the World So that there was no further necessity or occasion of his remaining in the bonds of death And it was most contrary to his will and pleasure to cause or suffer his Holy one to suffer impertinently who taketh care that his ordinarie Saints be not in heaviness except it be when need requireth it 1 Pet. 1 6. Secondly it was the unchangeable will of God according as it was foretold by David long before Psal 16.10 compared with Acts 2.27 c. that his Holy one meaning Christ should not see corruption Now it hath been the observation of some and is I conceive the judgment of more that a dead body after three daies lying in the Grave begins to putrifie and corrupt which seemeth also by that saying of Martha concerning the interred body of her Brother Lazarus Lord by this time he stinketh for he hath been dead four daies Joh. 11.39 to have been received for truth among the Jewes So that God to keep his Holy one in the grave longer then three daies from seeing Corruption must have wrought a Miracle and not long after another Miracle greater then that viz. in raising him from the dead But God is not pleased to multiply miracles but only to accommodate great necessities or occasions Quest 20. But if the death of Christ was only temporal and of no longer Continuance then three dayes and three nights how can it be a reasonable compensation to the justice or just severitie of God against sin which required the eternal death of so many millions as should sin Answ To this Question Answer hath in part been given formerly where it was in effect said that the infinite dignity of the person considered it was altogether as high ah act or as high an expression of Gods just hatred and severity against sin not to absolve those or any of those that had sinned but only upon the account of the death yea be it but of the temporal death of Jesus Christ as it would have been to have punished all and every one of the said sinners with death eternal Unto which this may be added that it was not eternal death as such I mean as Eternal which the justice of God required of those that should sin or had sinned but death simply In that day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die or according to the Hebrew dying thou shalt die Gen. 2.17 This death indeed consequentially and as it were by accident would have been eternal viz. through the weakness and inability of the creature on whom it was to be inflicted being not able to deliver it self from it For if for argument sake it could be supposed that any creature on which God shall inflict death for sin be it that death which we call temporal could recover it self from under this death or restore it self unto life again it is not reasonable to think that God would punish this creature with another death or inflict death upon it the second time for that sin for which the first death was inflicted The Apostle Paul I conceive insinuates this notion where he saith though by way of allusion that he that is dead or that hath died 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is justified 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from sin Rom. 6 7. meaning that a perfon having once suffered the sentence of the Law which is Death is not further responsible for his miscarriage but stands in the eye of this Law as innocent or righteous So that the death of Christ though but temporal yet is not only upon a geometrical or upon an equitable account but even upon an arithmetical strict or literal account a full compensation to the justice of God against sin uttering it self in that threatning In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death Quest 21. Was there then any occasion or necessity for the Resurrection of
used places might be cited in great numbers from the Scriptures themselves as well as from other Authors whereby this would be made manifest 2. In very many places of Scripture it signifieth determinately an individuum of the male Sex or a man Mat. 8.9.27.9.8.9.32.10.35 36.11.8.19.12.10 11.13 to omit double and trebble this number of instances in the New Testament only 3d It sometimes signifieth a man as contradistinguished to a Woman Mat. 19.3.5 1 Cor. 7.1 So that the Text mentioned 1 Cor. 11.28 containeth no particular or express precept for womens receiving the Lords Supper There is no word here that particularly or expresly and necessarily signifieth a woman And were it not for some Scripture grounds one or more from whi h it may be proved that there is the same or the like reason why women should partake of this Sacrament which there is for men that place would signifie little as to their receiving it especially considering yet further that the Apostle manageth his whole discourse in this place about the Supper in the masculine Gender only as appears v. 20 21 22 27 29 30 31 32.33 But suppose this place should be admitted to pass as a particular precept unto women to partake of the Lords Table yet there will be found no such precept nor any example in the Scripture to justifie the act of him that shall administer or deliver this Sacrament unto them but the lawfulness or necessity rather by way of duty hereof must be argued or inferred either from some general precept or from some principle or ground which in a rational constructive and consequential way require of Ministers such an action as being the will of God concerning them upon occasion It is more easie then needful to give instance in many more particulars of like consideration So that an action or practise may be not only warrantable and lawful but even highly necessary by way of duty when there is neither an express command nor example to evince either the lawfulness or necessity of it This for the former proposition For the minor proposition which affirmeth that all Children at least of the Church and of believing Parents are in favor with God it hath both the greater light of the Scriptures and the lesser light of reason shining clearly on it From these two heads of arguing a just volume of discourse might be drawn up in the demonstration and defence of it I shall at present give you a taste only of the genius of the one and of the other about the point reserving the clearing of difficulties and answering of objections until we meet with an opportunity of more liberty for discourse The Scripture speaketh aloud the truth of the said proposition as in many other places so especially Rom. 5.18 19. compared with v. 15. Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon ALL MEN to condemnation◠even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came us on ALL MEN unto justification of life For as by one mans disobedience MANY were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall MANY be made righteous Evident it is that the Apostle from the end of the 14th verse to the end of the chapter discourseth the typical resemblance or similitude declaring by the way and upon the occasion the dissimilitude likewise between the first and the second Adam in their respective procurements of evil by the former of good by the latter unto men That which is most observable to our purpose in the discourse is that the number of persons restored unto an estate of righteousness and of life by the second Adam is still made commensurable and equal unto the number of those who were brought into an estate of condemnation and death by the first Adam both numbers being all along expressed and described as the same and in the same words as was even now shewed As by the offence of one judgement came upon all MEN to condemnation even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon ALL MEN unto justification of life That ALL MEN in the former part of the verse includeth all persons of mankinde without exception of any capable of the judgement mentioned and consequently all Infants or young Children is no mans doubt or question and that that self-same expression used again in the latter part of it should here so far vary its signification as to exclude far the greater part of mankinde and signifie only an handful of them comparatively is too far both from reason and from example as well in the Scripture as in other Writers for any man reasonably to conceive Therefore all Infants whilst such and until the committing of acutal sin are partakers of the Grace of God vouchsafed unto the world by Jesus Christ according to that of John Baptist John 1.29 Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away THE SIN of the world The sin of Adam by which the whole world became obnoxious unto death is most properly termed The sin of the world and the Evangelist John when he speaketh of the Redemption wrought by Christ in the extent of it as well unto the the personal and actual sins of men as their guilt derived from the sin of Adam is wont to express it by mentioning sins in the plural number not sin in the singular unless it be with a note of universality which is somewhat more emphatical and altogether as comprehensive as the plural number for which see 1 John 1.79 but for the other see 1 John 2.2.3.5.4.10 This Doctrine that Infants and young children are in favor with God might be argued and proved from several other places also as Mat. 18.3.19.14 15. Mark 10.14 15.9.36 37. Luke 18.16 17. John 8.34 to omit the rest those texts likewise might be as readily answered which are thought by many to oppose it as Eph. 2.1 2 3. job 14.4 John 3.5 6. 1 Cor. 7.14 with some others But we intend not in this work a large discussion of any thing In reason there is this amongst many other things to confirm the said Doctrine Some Infants are in the love and favor of God therefore all are so likewise The antecedent in this argument is granted by all no man I presume affirming that God hateth or is an enemy unto all Infants without exception therefore some are in his favor The consequence is built upon that worthy character or property in God which the Scripture from place to place with a kinde of emphatical solemnity asserteth unto him I mean his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Pet. 1.17 or non-accepting or non-respecting of persons See Deut. 10 17. 2 Sam. 14.14 2 Chron. 19.7 Job 34.19.37.23 24. Mat. 22.16 Acts 10.34 Rom. 2.11 Gal. 2.6 Eph. 6.9 Col. 3.25 1 Pet. 1.17 Now if God be no respecter of persons but of the cause only for this is implied therein by way of antithesis and is elsewhere frequently and plainly affirmed of him certain it is that he sheweth the
and not of a Man also Why is he so frequently in the Scriptures especially in the Gospel both by himself and others styled the Son of Man and never the Son of a Woman Answ Although he be no where expresly called the Son of a Woman yet he is said to have been made of a Woman Gal. 4.4 And he is called the first-born Son of Mary Mat. 1.25 where it is likewise said ver 23. that a Virgin should conceive and bring forth a Son But when he is so oft termed The Son of Man the word Man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greek rather noteth the kind then the sex being a word as well of the Feminine as Masculine Gender and comprehended both sexes And though Christ was not the Son of any Man by immediate Propagation as all other men have been are and will be yet he was the Son of many Male-Progenitours as of David Abraham Adam and many others as is to be seen Mat. 1. compared with Luk. 3. Quest 18. But is Christ◠so oft styled the Son of Man for no other reason but only because he was a male-member of Mankind or because he had Men to his Progenitours Answ Although he could not properly be styled The Son of Man without the one and the other of both these yet neither the one of them nor the other nor both together seem to be the adequate or chief ground of that so frequent a denomination of him Quest 19. What then do you conceive or judge may be the chief reason or ground of that Appellation Answ I suppose to accommodate and relieve the infirmity or weakness both of the Faith and of the flesh of men For Christ being a Person so infinitely above them as in respect of his Divine Nature or God-head so in Glory Majesty Holiness Power place of Residence c. as he is the very thought of him without some allay or other to quallifie it must needs be burthensome if not over-whelming to their frail and weak flesh But the consideration that in the midst of all this his super-transcendent elevation above them yet is he bone of their bone and flesh of their flesh and communicates in the same nature with them that he is the Son of Man as well as the Son of God this much sweetneth their meditation of him and strengtheneth their flesh to bear the weight of his glory and of the apprehension of it much more comfortably CHAP. IV. Of the Life Death Resurrection Ascension and Glorification of Christ and of his coming to Judgement Quest 1. WHat necessity was there that Christ for the Redemption and Salvation of Men besides his being incarnate or made Man should live and converse in the world for several years amongst men Or If his life had been taken from him assoon as he received it or assoon as he was born into the world had ii not been sufficient Answ It was necessary in sundry respects that Christ should not only be conceived and born into the world but that he should also live to a good maturity of years walk and converse with men on Earth for a competent time c. This was necessary chiefly in four respects Quest 2. What is the first of these Answ It was necessary that the Captain of the Salvation of those that should believe should go before them in such a way of life and conversation wherein God judged it meet to impose it as a law upon all those that were to be saved to walk that is in a way of Innocency Holiness and all submissive Obedience unto God Heb. 7.26 1 Pet. 2.21 22. Mat. 11.29 Quest 3. What is a second consideration in respect of which it was necessary that Christ should live to the compleat age of a Man in the world Answ That he might kindle the fire of the Gospel in the world for which he was sent before he left it Luk. 12.49 that is that he might plant the Doctrine of it as it were by his own hands and make choyce of men for Apostles whom he might send forth with a charge and instructions to publish and preach the same far and near throughout the world Heb. 2.3 4. Mat. 28.18 19 20. Mar. 16.15 16 17. Quest 4. What is a third Consideration inducing the said necessity Answ That the laying down of his life might be a voluntary Sacrifice or Free-will-offering and consequently of the higher acceptance with God For had he not lived to years of discretion and to the use of reason he could not have offered himself unto God nor have given himself a ransom for all nor have laid down his life of himself c. In which voluntary resignments of himself into the hands of death according to the will of his Father the Scripture placeth much of the efficacy of his Death for the work of Redemption Heb. 9.15 1 Tim. 2.6 Joh. 10.17 18. with other places Quest 5. What is the fourth and last of the said Considerations Answ That by this means the truth of such Scripture-Predictions might be salved which either directly or implicitely presignified that his life should be continued unto him in the flesh until he arrived at the just age or years of a Man Quest 6. But Christian Religion doth not only teach that Christ was made flesh and that he lived in the world to Mans estate but that he suffered death also Was there any necessity of this for the work of Redemption and Salvation of men Answ It was declared in the former Chapter (a) Q. 16. how and in what respects the death of Christ was necessary for the Salvation of Men. In that way of saving them in which only as being most honourable unto him God hath been graciously pleased to do it the death of Christ is soveraignly necessary hereunto yea so necessary that it may be truly said No death of Christ ho life of Man Quest 7. How or what doth the death of Christ contribute towards the Redemption or Salvation of the World Answ It contributeth toward these by way of Ransom or Attonement that is it is in the Eye of Gods Justice or just severity against Sin a valuable consideration for the Sin of the whole World or for the discharge of all those from guilt and punishment who have sinned against him how many or how great soever their sins have been So that he judgeth and this according to the most apparent truth that he hath as fully manifested his just displeasure and indignation against sin by delivering up his Son Christ unto death as he should or could have done by inflicting the vengeance of Eternal fire upon all and every person of mankind that have sinned Quest 8. But for whom or for the expiation or taking away of whose sins did Christ suffer death Or Whose salvation did God intend by it Answ Doubtlesse Christ suffered death for all men and the Salvation of all men was intended by God by it For the Scripture expresly saith that
he gave himself a ransome for all men 1 Tim. 2.6 And Christ himself saith that he would give his flesh for the life of the World Joh. 6.51 Elsewhere it is said of him that he was made a little lower then the Angels by suffering of death that he by the grace of God might tast death for every man Heb. 2.9 And of God it is said that he will have all men to be saved 1 Tim. 2.4 and again that he is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance and so be saved 2 Pet. 3.9 Quest 9. But if Christ dyed for all men and God intendeth or willeth the Salvation of all men by him How cometh it to passe that all men are not saved Or Shall all men be saved by him Answ The Scripture plainly declareth that all men will not be saved yea that far the greater part of men will perish Mat. 7.13 14. Luk. 13 24. But the reason why any man perisheth or is not saved is not because Christ dyed not for him as well or as much as he dyed for those that are saved but because he believed not in him or on God by him with such a Faith as those others did viz. which worketh by love Quest 10. Doth then the Faith of men give efficacy or vertue to the Death of Christ so that with it it is able to save them but without it it is not able Answ The death of Christ is able to save men that is hath a complete saving efficacy in it whether men believe or no. Yet this saving efficacy of it taketh place in no man unless he believeth if by years and discetion he be capable of believing Neverthelesse that which giveth unto it the actual efficacy of saving those that do believe is not their Faith or believing but the authority of the gracious Decree or appointment of God wherein he hath ordained that all those shall be saved by the death of Christ that shall believe Quest 11. But if God intendeth the Salvation of all men in or by the death of Christ Will not his intentions in this kind be made frustrate unlesse all men be saved Answ No The reason is because though he really intendeth the Salvation of all men in the death of Christ yet he intendeth it not nor indeed the salvation of any man any otherwise or upon any other terms then only in case they shall believe Therefore his intentions of the Salvation of all men by the death of Christ cannot be made frustrate but only by the non-salvation of all men in case or although all men should believe Quest 12. But if Christ by his death satisfied for the sins of all men is not God unjust to punish any man for that for which he hath received full satisfaction Answ If the Intent and Agreement of him that made or gave the Satisfaction was that the benefit of this satisfaction should not inure or accrue unto any person but onely unto such who should owne and acknowledg the same by believing which clearly is the case in hand then is not God unjust to punish unbelievers notwithstanding the satisfaction made for them He should in this case rather be unjust in case he should discharge any of the debtors contrary to the will and desire of him that hath tendered the satisfaction or contrary to the Covenant which he hath made with him Quest 13. But was it necessarie for the work of Redemption or expiation of sin that Christ should suffer death would not lesser or lighter sufferings susteyned by him in respect of the dignity of his person have been sufficiently availeable thereunto Answ It was not simply and barely the Redemption of the World or the expiation of sin which God intended by Christ but the effecting of both upon the most honourable terms both for his wisdome righteousnesse and severity against sin Therefore though it might be a question or matter of doubt whether some under-sufferings of Christ might not have effected the Redemption of the world simply considered or without any breach made upon equity yet it can be neither but that the death it self of Christ was necessary hereunto in that way of effecting or procuring it which was only pleasing in the sight of God And it is a clear case that God's just severity against sin could not have been so fully manifested by any lighter sufferings of Christ as now it hath been by his Death Quest 14. What manner or kind of death was it that Christ suffered Answ The death of Crucifying or of hanging nailed upon a Crosse untill he were dead Quest 15. Why did he suffer this kind of death rather then any other Answ This was that kind of death which the Romans under whose jurisdiction Christ suffered usually inflicted upon their Malefactours being both ignominious and painful And besides there was a special hand of Gods providence in Christ's suffering this kind of Death for by this it was the more lively declared that he was made a Curse for those that were under the curse of the Law According to the saying in the Law it self Deu. 21.23 he that is hanged is accursed of God See Gal. 3.13 Quest 16. But if Christ by his death fully satisfied the justice of God for the sin of man or of mankind how cometh it to passe that men themselves yea believers as well as others are punished by him with death and with many other afflictions notwithstanding this Satisfaction Answ Although Death with the sad retinew of other Sufferings at first came into the world upon the account and by means of sin already committed and came in the nature and notion of punishments for it yet Christ by his satisfaction hath so altered the property of them that they are not now properly punishments for sin committed though sin committed may occasion or cause them to be inflicted by God as 1 Cor. 11.30 but chastisements to prevent the commission of sin and so to prepare and render them meet for salvation being inflicted though justly yet not out of justice but out of love and mercy by God See and compare Heb. 12.5 6 7 8 9 10 11. 1 Cor. 11.32 2 Cor. 6.9 Revel 3.19 Deu. 8.5 Esa 26.16 Psal 94.12 Jer. 31.18 with some others yea Death it self is and may in this respect be called a Chastisement and not a punishment viz. because it prevents further sinning and makes way for the Saints into their Glory Notwithstanding because chastisements are like unto punishments and the same in the letter and substance with them they may sometimes according to the rule Similiae similium nominibus gaudent Things alike are oft expressed by the same names be called Punishments as Levit. 26.41.43 Lam. 3.39 Am. 3.2 and elsewhere So likewise because when they are very grievous and sore they are like unto the effects of wrath and anger they are sometimes ascribed to these passions in God as the cause of them Esa 12.1 Psal 79.5 Zech.
Christ from the dead save only for his own benefit and advancement Answ Yes The Apostle Paul expresly teacheth us that he was raised again viz. from death for our justification Rom. 4.25 which the Apostle Peter interprets at least in part where he saith that God raised him up from the dead and gave him glory that your Faith and Hope might be in God 1 Pet. 1.21 And the former Apostle elsewhere saith If Christ be not risen then is our preaching vain and your Faith is also vain 1 Cor. 15.14.17 If Christ had still remained or been deteyned by God in the prison of Death it would have argued that he had failed or fallen short in giving that satisfaction unto the justice of God for sin which was undertaken by him and consequently there could have been no sufficient ground for any man to believe in God for the forgivenesse of his sins upon the account of his death without which Faith there can be no justification Whereas his being discharged by God from his imprisonment in death effectually proveth that he had made full payment unto him of that debt which he had taken upon himself to discharge And upon this account there is firm footing for every man to expect by Faith the forgiveness of his sins at the hand of God Quest 22. By what or whose power was Christ raised from the dead Answ The Scripture ascribeth his raising or riseing again from the dead sometimes unto himself or his own power and sometimes and more frequently unto God the Father and his power See and compare Joh. 2.19 Rom. 1.4 Joh. 10.18 1 Pet. 3.18 Rom. 14.9 Act. 24.32 Act. 5.4.10 Act. 5. 30. 1 Cor. 15.15 Eph. 1.20 with many others Quest 23. Why is the resurrection of Christ attributed unto himself or his own power Answ For the confirmation of this great Article of our faith that he is truly and by nature God or the natural Son of God Rom. 1.4 inasmuch as none but God is able to raise the dead Ephe. 1.19 20. Quest 24. Why is his resurrection ascribed unto God the Father Answ Partly to make the belief of it more passable with men inasmuch as it is no waies incredible but that God should be able to raise the dead Act. 26.8 though such a thing exceed's the power of every created being partly to confirm and satisfie us in this so great a matter of concernment to us that he is fully satisfied with the death and sufferings of Christ for the sins of the world and upon this account hath as it were with his own hands brought him out of the prison of death wherein he had been detained for a season Quest 25. What doth the Apostle Paul mean by a mans knowing the power of Christs Resurrection as likewise the Fellowship of his sufferings Phil. 3.10 Answ By knowing the power of Christs resurrection he meaneth an inward and reall sense or apprehension how mighty and glorious an encouragement the resurrection of Christ is unto any man to believe in God for salvation Or else how powerful an influence the resurrection of Christ rightly apprehended hath upon the Consciences of men to forsake all their dead works and to walk in newnesse of Life Rom. 6. verse 4. Compared with verse 5. By Fellowship with Christ in his Sufferings he means a mans dying that is his declining in love and affection to this present World and to all vain and sinful Contentments ingageing and provoking himself hereunto by the Consideration of the Sufferings of Christ for him He saith Peter that hath suffered in the Flesh that is who hath conformed himself unto Christ who suffered in the flesh for him Hath ceased from Sin 1 Pet. 4.1 Quest 26. How long after Christ's Resurrection was it before his Ascension Answ The space of forty daies Act. 1.3 Quest 27. Why did he make his abode on Earth for so long a time after his Resurrection before he asscended Answ Because God judged this space of time necessarie and competent for him to give full assurance of the Truth and Certainty of his Resurrection unto his Apostles by exhibiting several enterviews of himself unto them and this at times somewhat distant for their better satisfaction as also to give instructions unto them about managing that great and weighty affair of preaching and publishing the Gospel throughout the World which they were now shortly to enter upon with such other things as related hereunto as the raising and ordering of Churches c. Quest 28. Whither did Christ ascend Answ Farre above all Heavens Eph. 4.10 that is farre above all visible Heavens For otherwise God himself is said to be in Heaven Mat. 6.9 and elsewhere yea and Heaven is said to be his dwelling place 1 King 8.49 Elsewhere he is said to be gone into Heaven simply as Act. 1.11 and 1 Pet. 3.22 So to have entered into Heaven Heb 9.24 Therefore it is like that the Apostles meaning is that he asscended into that Heaven which is called the Heaven of Heavens Deut. 10.14 where God converseth face to face with his Holy Angels revealing himself in all his glory unto them The scituation of which Heaven is farre above all those other globes or Spheres which in respect of their feat above the Earth are called Heavens Quest 29. Was the Ascension of Christ any waies necessary or conducing to the benefit of the world or the salvation of men Answ His Ascension as it includes or implies his inauguration or entrance into his great Dignity and Glory in which notion the Scripture commonly speaks of it was necessary to minister an opportunity unto the Father together with himself to send forth the holy Spirit into the World after another manner and upon farre more gracious and glorious termes then according to his being in it formerly The reason why the Holy Ghost was not thus given some-while before is said to be because Jesus was not yet glorified that is entred into his glory Joh. 7.39 So a little before his Death he tells his Disciples that it was expedient for them that he should goe away meaning that he should ascend into Heaven or go up unto his Father For saith he if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you But if I depart I will send him unto you Joh. 16.7 And Ephes 4.8 when he ascended up on high he led Captivity Captive that is that his triumphant Ascension declared that he had conquered Sin Death and Hell and so had dissolved or turned that great and sad Captivity or Thrauldome wherein the World was detayned by Sathan as having been conquered by him and gave Gifts unto men and ver 10 it is said that he ascended up farre above all Heavens that he might fill all things that is that he might heal the emptinesse and vanity of the World by filling men with the sound and saving knowledg of God which he did by giving the gifts mentioned ver 11. And he gave some Apostles some Prophets
of Judah and Jerusalem Break up your fallow ground and sow not amongst thornes Circumcise your selves unto the Lord and take away the foreskins of your hearts lest my fury come forth like fire and burn c. Supposing first that the men of Iudah and Ierusalem to whom this Doctrine at the appointment of God was preached were at this time persons unregenerate and Secondly that the several callings upon them in the metaphors of breaking up their fallow ground of circumcising themselves unto the Lord of taking away the foreskins of their hearts were admonitions or injunctions unto them from God to alter the sinful property of their hearts and souls or in the Prophet Esai's expression to wash and make themselves clean or in the more plain and direct Language of Ezekiel to make themselves a new heart and a new spirit all which expressions import the work of Regeneration or Sanctification or Mortification or rather indeed include them all these two things I say supposed which I presume are not denied by any from the said words I plead the cause in hand thus If God requireth it of unregenerate men to sanctifie or regenerate themselves threatning them with his wrath and fury to their utter destruction if they shall not obey him therein then certainly they have power to do the one or the other otherwise he should threaten to destroy his Creature for that which is no waies sinful nor a Transgression of any Law For it is no waies sinful for a Creature not to do things that are impossible for him to do or not to do that which is possible only for God himself to do Therefore without controversie God doth afford unto unregenerate men at least if they be not many degrees worse and more hateful unto him then simply as such sufficient abilities and means whereby to become new men or make themselves new hearts There is hardly to be found amongst men a Tyrant so Barbarous Bloody or Inhumane who when he hath cut off the leggs or feet of any of his Subjects though for some misdemeanour will further threaten him with Death unlesse he shall runn as fast as his lightest Footman or swiftest Horse in his Stables Quest 8. What is the tenour of your second place and how do you argue from thence for the point in question Answ This place conteineth these words Therefore I will judge you O house of Israel every one according unto his waies saith the Lord God Repent and turn your selves from all your Transgressions So iniquity shall not be your ruine Cast away from you all your Transgressions whereby ye have transgressed and make you a new heart and a new spirit for why will ye die O house of Israel For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth saith the Lord God wherefore turn your selves and live yee In these words the great duties or works of Repentance Sanctification Regeneration Mortification I might add of Self-denial also are not only or simply required by God of men themselves but with a very gracious and compassionate expostulation about the misery which they would certainly bring upon their own heads if they did not perform them for why will ye die c. together with promise upon promise of favour life and peace in case they did perform them so iniquity shall not be your Ruine and again turn your selves and live yee That is and yee shall certainly live Now it is broadly inconsistent with that most gracious and merciful disposition unto the Children of men which the Scriptures in a thousand places ascribe unto God to promise good things unto them as life peace safety c. only upon such conditions or termes which he knows to be utterly impossible for them yea with all the help or means which he intends ever to afford them ever to perform This would rather be most cruelty to insult over poor creatures in misery then either to compassionate them or to counsell or direct them how to deliver themselves and make an escape Therefore doubtlesse this contexture of Scriptures maketh it as clear as the light at noon-day that men even whilest they are yet in their sins and unbelievers have a sufficiency of Grace power and means vouchsafed unto them by God to make themselves new hearts and new spirits to repent and turn themselves from all their Transgressions c. Quest 9. What is your third and last place of Scripture to prove your Assertion Answ This place containeth only these few words And he the Lord Christ marvelled because of their unbelief If the people at or because of whose unbelief Christ is said to have marvelled were in no sufficient capacity by all the grace nor by all the means of grace granted unto them to have believed and consequently to have made themselves new hearts to have sanctified themselves c. there had been no reasonable nor indeed tolerable cause why Christ should marvel at their unbelief at least if it be supposed that this their incapacity of believing was known unto him and ignorance in this kind cannot he supposed in him who searcheth the hearts and the reins of the Children of men Revel 2.23 For what occasion is there in the least that a man should marvell because a Creature acteth not beyond or above the sphere of his activity as that a man should not flie like a bird in the aire that an ox should not run swifter then a grey-hound or the like For a person to marvell that a man doth not believe whom he knoweth to have no power of believing and to marvell that a stone doth not speak Hebrew or Greek unto him are passions much of one and the same consideration Quest 10. What are now your Reasons and grounds which strengthen your belief of the Doctrine you maintain concerning a sufficiency of power given by God unto men whereby to sanctifie and regenerate and deny themselves to mortifie the deeds of the Flesh c. Answ There are many Reasons which prevail over my judgment to conclude the said Doctrine to be a Doctrine of Truth but more especially Seven Quest 11. What is the first of these Reasons Answ If God should not upon the account of Christ and of the Grace brought by him unto the World invest Adams posterity with a sufficiency of power to do all things simply and absolutely necessary for their salvation and oonsequently to perform the duties of Sanctification Regeneration Mortification and Self-denyal these at least in some degree being absolutely necessary unto Salvation be should deal with much more rigour and severity in the second Covenant which yet is a Covenant of Grace and usually so called then he did in the first which being a Covenant of Works was very peremptory though righteous and just denying all mercy to transgressours For although in the first Covenant he was very strict and severe against Transgressours yet he was thus far gracious and indulgent unto his creature Man that he required nothing
entire Nation of the Jews whatever their numbers are or shall be being the great Father of the race In like figure of speaking Esau Moab Ammon with others of like consideration are often used in Scripture to express the people descending from them respectively Secondly Remission of sin is not to be taken either for that state or condition into which a person is translated immediately upon his Repentance by having his sins pardoned or for the act of God by which he pardons his sins upon his Repentance and hereby translateth him into such a state but for that act of absolution or acquitment from all his sins which shall be pronounced over him by Christ at the last judgement of which the Apostle Peter speaketh Acts 3.19 Repent ye therefore and be converted that your sins may be blotted out when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord and he shall send Jesus Christ which before was preached unto you whom c. See also Acts 26.18 So then these two Baptisme and Remission of sins thus understood when it is said that Repentance and Baptisme are in ordinary cases joyntly required as necessary for the obtaining of Remission of sins the meaning is that a Christian Profession of Repentance by wayes and works suitable unto the nature of it in case a man hath time and opportunity after his Repentance to walk in them which for the most part men have is as necessary to salvation or which is in effect the same to the obtaining of a final absolution from the great Judge in the great day as Repentance it self This is nothing but what perfectly agreeth with the tenor and import of all those Scriptures which either exclude persons of unholy and wicked or unfruitful lives from the Kingdome of Heauen which are obvious and in great numbers or else which require an open profession and confession of the name and words of Christ upon occasion as well as Faith in him unto salvation For this see Mat. 10.32 33. Mark 8.38 Rom. 10.10 Quest 42. Whether is the use of Baptisme necessary by way of Precept and as a duty in these dayes of the Gospel some conceiving that the obliging force of the precept concerning it expired with the times of the Apostles Answ An answer unto this question hath been given in part formerly namely where we inquired into the grounds and reasons upon which the Gospel was or well might be set forth by God with Sacramental institutions accompanying it See what was answered to Quest 5 6 7 c. in this chapter For if the reasons and ends of these institutions be perpetual and relating as much in matters of spiritual benefit and service unto us in these dayes as they did or could do to those who lived in the dayes of the Apostles there is little question to be made but that the use of the institutions is intended by God as well and as much for us in these dayes as it was for them Besides Baptisme as was more lately argued being the seal of this Gospel-Covenant which God hath made with men that upon their Repentance their sins shall be forgiven them it may with as much reason or with very little less be conceived that he hath disanulled the Covenant it self as the seal of it especially not having appointed another in the place thereof Again that Baptisme is no legal but an Evangelical Ordinance and consequently to be administred and practised under the Gospel during the ministry hereof in the world might be made evident by the light of many reasons were it not a thing evident enough without it As 1. He was a Gospel Minister to whom the Counsel of God concerning it was first revealed with a commission and charge to publish it by preaching and then to administer it All the Prophets saith Christ Mat. 11.13 and the Law prophesied until John exclusively meaning that God by the ministry and writings of the Prophets and by the Law recorded by Moses instructed the world and more especially the Jews in matters appertaining to his Worship and Service and to their own eternal peace but in his servant John he intended to found a new Ministry of a more glorious and heavenly import And that John was no Minister of the Law but of the Gospel is evident because he preached the Messiah as being come into the world yea and shewed unto some his very person to be beheld by them 2. If Baptisme were a legal Ordinance being an initiating or introductory Ordinance as Cirumcision was it should binde the receivers of it to the observation of the whole Mosaical Law as Circumcision according to the Apostles Doctrine Gal. 5.3 did 3. It was given down from Heaven unto the world upon the account of Christ and for his manifestation in the world a new Rite or Ceremony in Religion or in the Worship of God being as the shaking of the Heavens and an Item from God that he was now about to dissolve and remove the ancient frame of his Worship which had been once solemnly enjoyned and since approved and continued by him in the world from the dayes of Moses until then for the space of a thousand five hundred years and upwards which great alteration was to be made by the Messiah And I knew him not saith John Baptist John 1.31 but that he should be made manifest unto Israel therefore am I come baptizing with water 4. If coming into the world upon so solemn high and sacred an account as for Christs sake and to signifie and give notice of his coming into it it is not likely that he should abrogate it especially after so short a continuance of it in the world as it had from the day of its first entrance into it until the day of Christs death 5. If Christ had abolished it by his death would he after his resurrection either have joyned it with Faith it self in the same promise wherein he promiseth salvation as he doth Mark 16.16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved or have charged his Apostles with those that should succeed them in the ministery of the Gospel and unto the end of the world with the administration of it unto those amongst whom they should preach the Gospel if they received it yet this also he did Mat. 28.19 Go ye therefore and teach all nations BAPTIZING them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost To understand the word Baptizing here in any improper or by-signification is repugnant both to that wholesome and sound rule concerning the interpretation of Scripture which enjoyns the ordinary and proper sense of words when ever the context and matter in hand will bear it as also to the judgements of all expositors one or other ancient or modern who according to the best intelligence that my reading and hearing in conjunction with my memory are able to afford me have expounded it of baptizing with water 6. The Apostles after
the death and resurrection of Christ had a liberty indeed for a time but as it seems with limitation unto cases of much conveniency and expediency for the Gospel to make use of legal Rites and Ceremonies and accordingly they were very tender and sparing in the use of them yea in such cases wherein they apprehended that the Gospel was like to suffer by the use of them they resolvedly opposed them But we finde them very diligent and earnest in exhorting and perswading men unto Baptisme upon all occasions that is upon their first conversion to the faith of the Gospel Therefore certainly Baptisme was no legal Service or Ceremony nor numbred amongst those which Christ abrogated by his death 7. and lastly If it were such I mean a legal Ceremony and not Evangelical there would be no visible door of entrance or admission into a Christian profession no external solemnity engaging to a consciencious observance of the terms and requirements hereof whereas there was such a door and solemnity as we speak of and as we lately signified by which and through which men entred upon the profession of the Jewish Religion and Worship of God delivered by Moses unto this Nation But that there was a like door of entrance into or upon the profession of Christ and of the Gospel and consequently that this door is still remaining in its place and use for doors are not to be taken away whilst the house is inhabited especially not by servants without express order from their Master which in the case before us is not to be found and that this door was Baptisme and therefore as we now reasoned is so still is the Apostle Pauls express Doctrine Gal. 3.27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have hereby put on Christ As in the morning a man by such actions which nature teacheth him putteth on his Cloaths which he weareth in he day so a person at the time of his Baptisme and by being baptized according to the signification and import of this action intended and declared by God investeth himself with Christ that is entreth upon an open and avowed profession of the Name Law and Discipline of Christ wherein he stands hereby also bound to continue all the dayes of his life See also Rom. 6.3 Quest 43. Who and what manner of persons are they that may lawfully be baptiz'd Answ All without exception of both Sexes who desire it in case there be the least ground of hope that they are in favour with God yea and all those also on whose behalf it is desired by others themselves being uncapable through want of years to desire it who are in authority over them and have a right of power to dispose of them Quest 44. Why must or ought those who are duly capable of being baptized being of years of discretion to give any testimony or ground of hope that they are in favour with God Answ We finde from place to place in the New Testament that some such testimony was insisted upon and required if it were not already given of those who desired to be baptized by those that were to administer the Ordinance unto them and commonly a profession of Faith or Repentance was in this case demanded because such a profession was especially in these times when the profession of Christianity exposed the Professors to many dangers and troubles a competent and probable ground on which to judge men to be in favor with God and withal was the most commodious and proper that could be given suddenly or within a short time Upon this account these Scriptures with their fellows may at leasure be consulted considered and compared Mat. 3.7 8. Mark 1.5 Luke 3.7 8. Acts. 2.38.41.8.12.37.10.47.18.8 The reason why such persons only are meet to be admitted unto Baptisme who give some reasonable account of their being in favour with God is because Sacramental Ordinances and this of Baptisme in particular were intended by God the great Founder of them for his own House and Family only for his Friends and Servants not for strangers or enemies or in the Apostles expression for those that are within not for those that are without They are somwhat of a like design with the Mosaical Ceremonies of old in that notion or consideration of them wherein they were a partition-wall between his own people the Jews and the rest of the world the Gentiles Eph. 2.14 For so do these Institutions or Divine Ceremonies distinguish and divide the holy from the unclean the believing from the unbelieving party of the world at least those that profess and pretend to Holiness and Faith from those that neither practise not profess either And they would perform this distinguishing and dividing part much more effectually and exactly and much more to the honor and advantage of the Gospel then now they do did not men think themselves either more charitable or more wise in building Churches then those master work-men themselves the Apostles at least did they not act in this kinde of work as if they judged the Apostles but novices at it in comparison of themselves But this by the way Indeed supernatural signes or miracles when God is pleased to unbare his arm in working them are commonly intended by him for strangers and unbelievers in order to their awakening and conversion by Faith unto him 1 Cor. 14.22 Exod. 4.3 4 5. John 2.23.4.48 6.30 12.37 Acts 8.6 But Sacramental signes are as hath been said peculiarly for those that are already awakened to a believing in God or at least profess so to be Now why God was pleased to appoint and appropriate Sacramental signes unto his Churches and so for the use and benefit of those who are by the death of Christ actually reconciled unto him and in favour with him a sufficient account hath been formerly given See the answers to Question 5.6 7 c. of this Chapter This then is or may be the reason why persons of years before their admission unto Baptisme ought to give some testimony of their interest in the paternal love and favor of God or rather why God hath imposed this upon them as a condition the performance whereof qualifieth them for the reception of this Ordinance Other reasons hereof might be given but where the will of God is express and plain and nothing found in it disturbing or offensive to the reasons or apprehensions of men there is the less need of them Quest 45. Whether may Infants or young Children lawfully be baptized considering that they are not able to give any testimony as either by a profession of their Faith and Repentance or otherwise of their being in the favor of God and besides there is no record found in the Scripture that mentioneth the baptizing of any Infant Answ The controversie about Infant-Baptisme chiefly through the too-resolved inconsiderateness of those who have opposed it but partly also by reason of the insufficiency of some grounds upon which it hath been maintained