were directed to give him this name of an High Father by the Spirit of Prophesie yet considering it suitableness unto what God had designed him for and its readiness to yield unto that Change which God made afterwards in it unto a great strengthning of his faith and significancy in a way of instruction unto future generations we must grant that it was done by the designing holy wise Providence of God For he was an High Father indeed as being the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ according to the flesh In process of time upon the solemn establishment of the Covenant with him God change this name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 17. v. 5. Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram but thy name shall be Abraham And on the like account did God also change the names of some other persons or superadded new names unto those whereby they were called before as of Israel unto Jacob Gen. 33. v. 28. upon his prevalency with God as a Prince Jedidiah unto Solomon 2 Sam. 12. v. 25. because the Lord loved him And many doubtless had new names given unto them by themselves or others or some letter or syllable changed in their names withall altering their signification upon emergent occasions Hence have we so many in the Old Testament whom we find in several places expressed by divers names or varied in one place from another Now this change in the name of Abraham was not as the Jews fancy to honour him with the addition of a letter out of the Tetragrammaton but for the addition of a new Prophetical significancy unto it as God himself expresly declares Thy name shall be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Abraham for a father of a multitude of nations have I made thee According as he said before v. 3. Thou shalt be a father of a multitude of nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his name denoting 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a multitude that is of Nations God himself expounding his own intention and design And herein is a solemn prefiguration of the implanting of Believers of all Nations into the Covenant and Faith of Abraham for this name he received upon the solemn establishment of the Covenant with him as the Apostle explains the place Rom. 4. v. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17. All then that believe are taken into the Covenant of Abraham And as unto the priviledges of it and inheritance to be obtained by it they are no less his children and heirs then those who proceeded from his loins according to the flesh as hath been manifested in our Exercitation concerning the Oneness of the Church And herein also God manifested what was his design in his Call and separation unto himself even to make and constitute him and his Posterity the means of bringing forth the promised seed wherein all Nations were to be blessed Abraham being the tenth Generation from Noah exclusivè was the son of Terah of § 5 whom it is said Gen. 11.26 that Terah lived seventy years and begat Abram Nahor and Haran not doubtless in the same year but then the eldest of them was born who ever he was If Abraham was the eldest as he is first expressed he was born 292 years after the flood in the three hundred ninety second year of the life of Shem who out-lived him thirty five years And he was the sixth from Heber born in the two hundred twenty fifth year of his age who continuing longest of all the Postdiluvian Patriarchs outlived Abraham about sixty four years But there is a difficulty in this account For if Abraham was born in the seventieth year of the age of Terah Terah living in all two hundred and five years Abraham at the death of Terah must needs be one hundred thirty five years of age But the Scripture saith expresly that at his departure out of Haran upon the death of his Father he was no more but seventy five years old And if he was seventy five years old at the death of his Father who lived two hundred and five years he must be born in the one hundred and thirtieth of his Fathers life and not before which carries on his birth and death sixty years beyond the former account So that he outlived Shem twenty five years and dyed only four years before Heber Although therefore he be mentioned before Haran Gen. 11.26 yet indeed Haran was the Eldest Son of Terah and born before Abraham sixty years And it appears in the Story that Lot and Sarah who were the Children of Haran if Sarah was the Ischa mentioned as most suppose she was Gen. 11.29 were not much younger then Abraham himself For when Abraham was an hundred years old Sarah was ninety Gen. 17.17 and Lot may well be supposed to be Elder then she so that of Necessity Haran must be many years elder then Abraham even no less then sixty as we have declared § 6 His Nativity and Education was in Vr of the Chaldees Gen. 11.28 31. This place is said to be on the other side of the flood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the River Josh. 24.2 that is from the Land of Canaan on the other side of the great River Euphrates eastward It was so also of Tygris on the East of Aram Naharaim or Mesopotamia properly so called which is not insisted on because Abraham came over Tygris unto Haran with his Father Terah He came out saith Stephen from the Land of the Chaldaeans and dwelt in Canaan Acts 7.4 he sayes indeed that before he came unto Canaan he dwelt in Mesopotamia v. 2. wherein Haran was also For the name of Mesopotamia was given of old unto all the adjacent Regions even unto the Persian Sea So doth Pliny evidently lib. 6. cap. 26. Mesopotamia tota Assyriorum fuit vicatim dispersa praeter Babylona Ninum All Mesopotamia belonged unto the Assyrians and consuled of scattered Villages unless it were Babylonia and the Countrey about Nineveth And again Reliqua pars Mesopotamiae Assyriaeque-Babylonia appellata est So that he equals Mesopotamia with Assyria which how great a Tract of those Regions it comprehended is manifest from Ptolomy Strabo and others Eupolemus in Eusebius praeparat Evang. l. 9. placeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vra in Babylonia and there also Pliny mentioneth Vra upon the banks of Euphrates lib. 5. cap. 24. Fertur Euphrates usque ad Vram But this seems not to be the Vr where Abraham dwelt Nor was there any reason that in a design for Canaan he should remove from any part of Babylonia upon Euphrates unto Charan It is more likely to be the place mentioned by Ammianus lib. 5. where he sayes that the Romans in six dayes came from Corduena in Armenia ad Vr nomine Persicum Castellum unto Ur a Persian Castle And this he placeth between Nisibis and Tygris and was not far from the place where it is probably supposed that the Ark rested after the flood the family
which necessarily infers his prae-existence in another nature their perswasion about the Person of Christ is utterly overthrown Their exceptions in their controversial writings unto this place have been else-where considered Those of Eniedinus on this Text are answered by Paraeus those of Castalio by Beza and the objections of some others by Gomarus We shall in the first place consider what is proposed for the confirmation of their sense by Schlictingius or Crellius and then the exception of a very learned Expositor unto the sense before laid down and confirmed And Schlictingius first argues from the Context Praeter ipsa verba saith he quae hunc sensum nullo modo patiuntur ut postea dicemus contextus ratiocinatio authoris id repudiat qui pro ratione argumento id sumere non potuit debuitve quod sibi hoc ipso argumento ratione probandum sumsisset De eo enim erat quaestio cur Christus qui nunc ad tantam majestatem gloriam est evectus non angelicam sed humanam morti variis calamitatibus obnoxiam habuerit naturam bujus vero rei quo pacto ratio redderetur per id quod non angelicam sed humanam naturam assumpserit cum istius ipsius rei quae in hac quaestione continetur nempe quod Christus homo fuit natus nunc causa ratioque quaeratur At vero si haec verba de juvandis non Angelis sed hominibus deque ope iis ferenda intelligamus pulcherrime omnia cohaerent nempe Christum hominem mortalem fuisse non angelum aliquem quod non angelis sed hominibus juvandis servandisque fuerit destinatus But the foundation of this Exposition of the Context is a mistake which his own preceding discourse might have relieved him from For there is no such question proposed as here is imagined nor doth he in his following Exposition suppose it The Apostle doth not once propose this unto confirmation that it behoved the Lord Christ to be a man and not an Angel But having proved at large before that in Nature and Authority he was above the Angels he grants verse 8. that he was for a little while made lower than they and gives at large the reason of the necessity of that dispensation taken from the work which God had designed him unto which being to bring many sons unto glory he shews and proves by sundry reasons that it could not be accomplished without his death and suffering for which end it was indispensibly necessary that he should be made partaker of flesh and blood And this he confirms farther by referring the Hebrews unto the Scripture and in especial unto the great Promise of the Messiah made unto Abraham that the Messiah was to be his seed the love and grace whereof he amplifies by an intimation that he was not to partake of the Angelical nature That supposition therefore which is the foundation of this Exposition namely that the Apostle had before designed to prove that the Messiah ought to partake of humane nature and not of Angelical which is nothing to his purpose is a surmise suited only to the present occasion Wherefore Felbinger in his Demonstrationes Evangelica takes another course and affirms that these words contain the end of what was before asserted verse 14 15. namely about Christs participation of flesh and blood which was not to help Angels but the seed of Abraham and to take them into grace and favour But these things are both of them expresly declared in those verses especially verse 15. where it is directly affirmed that his design in his Incarnation and Death was to destroy the devil and to free and save the children And to what end should these things be here again repeated and that in words and terms far more obscure and ambiguous than those wherein it was before taught and declared For by Angels they understand evil Angels and there could be no cause why the Apostle should say in this Verse that he did not assist or relieve them when he had declared in the words immediately fore-going that he was born and died that he might destroy them Neither is it comely to say that the end why Christ destroyed the devil was that he might not help him or the end why he saved the children was that he might assist them Besides the introduction of this assertion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will not allow that here any end is intimated of what was before expressed there being no insinuation of any final cause in them The Context therefore not answering their occasion they betake themselves to the words Verbum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he significat proprie manu aliquem apprehendere sive ut illum aliquo ducas sive ut sustentes hinc ad opitulationem significandum commodè transfertur quos enim adjutos volumus ne cadant vel sub onere aliquo succumbant aut si ceciderint erectos cupimus iis manum injicere solemus quo sensu Ecclesiastic 4. v. 12. De sapientia dictum est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc est opitulatur quaerentibus se eadem est significatio verbi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quod qui aliquem sublevatum velint illi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 adverso manum porrigere solent It is acknowledged that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth frequently signifie as here is alledged namely to help and assist as it were by putting forth the hand for to give relief But if that were intended by the Apostle in this place what reason can be assigned why he should wave the use of a word proper unto his purpose and frequently so applied by himself in other places and make use of another which signifying no such thing nor any where used by him in that sense must needs obscure his meaning and render it ambiguous Whereas therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to help and relieve and is constantly used by our Apostle in that sense it being not used or applied by him in this place to express his intention but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies no such thing nor is ever used by him to that purpose the sense contended for of help and relief is plainly excluded The place of Ecclesiasticus and that alone is referred unto by all that embrace this Exposition But what if the word be abused in that place by that Writer must that give a rule unto its interpretation in all other Writers where it is properly used But yet neither is the word used there for to help and relieve but to take and receive Wisdom suscipit receiveth or taketh unto it self suo more those that seek it which is the sense of the word we plead for and so is it rendred by Translators So the Lord Christ suo modo took to himself the seed of Abraham by uniting it unto his person as he was the Son of God In the very entrance also of his discourse this Author acknowledgeth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
done away from me and accept of my Repentance that all Ages may know that there is Repentance and that thou wilt receive them that Repent and turn unto thee Hence also they tell us that upon the Pardon of his sin he sang a Song of Praise unto the Lord on the Sabbath Day which is mentioned in the Targum on the Song of Solomon chap. 1. v. 1. as one of the Songs in reference whereunto that of Solomon is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Song of Songs or the most excellent of them And although indeed that expression 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dying thou shalt dye according to the propriety of the Hebrew Tongue denotes only the Certainty and Vehemency of the Death threatned in which case it useth reduplications yet some of them have not been averse to apprehend a twofold death of the Body and of the Soul to be intimated in that expression as Fagius on the place well observes Body and Soul they say both sinned and therefore both were to be punished 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If the flesh sâ—n without the spirit why is the soul punished Is it one thing that sins and another that is punished or rather is it not thus that both sin together and so both are justly punished together § 7 Thus is the condition of the Sin and Punishment of our first Parents themselves acknowledged by them And the same is that of their Posterity What was threatned unto what was inflicted upon those who first sinned they are all liable and obnoxious unto Are they not all as subject unto Death as was Adam himself Are the miseries of man in his labour or the sorrows of Women in Childbearing taken away Is the Earth its self freed from the Effects of the Curse Do they not dye who never sinned after the similitude of Adams Transgression The Jews themselves grant that all death is poenal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no Death without Sin no Punishment or Correction without iniquity It is the saying of R. Ame in the Talmud Tractat Sabbat cited in Sepher Ikharim lib. 4. cap. 13. And this Principle Mâ—imonides carries so high as to deny all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Correction of Love affirming none to be of that mind but some Gaeonims deceived by the Sect of Muatzali More Nebuch p. 3. cap. 17. And they who dye poenally under the Curse abide in no other estate than that mentioned They acknowledge also the remainder of the Curse on the Earth its self on the same account 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The whole World sayes one of their Masters was not created but for man and therefore after man sinned it came short of its first perfection But these things being of some use for their Conviction as also to discover the perverse obstinacy of some of their later Masters we may a little more particularly take them along with us § 8 First They acknowledge that Adam was a common Head unto all mankind So saith Manasse Ben. Israel from their Principles Cum itaque esset Adam futurus caput principium humanae naturae necesse erat illi a Deo conferri omnem perfectionem scientiam De Fragilitate pag. 34. Whereas Adam was to be the Head and Principle of humane nature it was necessary that God should endow him with all perfection and knowledge And this Perfection of his knowledge Aben Ezra on Gen. 12. proves from Gods bringing all Creatures unto him to give them Names according to their Nature And the same Author again in his Discourse de Termino Vitae Aben Ezra inquit nominibus propriis in Sacra Scriptura non praefigi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He demonstrativum quod tamen in voce Adam fit Gen. 3.22 ratio est quia in Adamo notantur omnes ejus posteri universa species humana designatur Aben Ezra sayes that He Hajedia is not prefixed unto proper names in the Scripture only it is so unto the Word Adam Gen. 3. v. 22. and the Reason is because in Adam all his Posterity the whole Race of Mankind is denoted and signified Now this could not be but by vertue of some Divine Constitution For naturally Adam could have no other Relation to his Posterity than every other man hath unto his own And this was no other but that Covenant which God made with all mankind in him whose Promises and Threatnings Rewards and Punishments must therefore equally respect them with him Wherefore Secondly they grant that on this account his Sin was imputed unto all his Posterity That is some of them do so and those the most sober of them So Rabbi Menahem Rakanatensis in sec. Bereshith c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is no wonder why the Sin of Adam and Eve was engraven and sealed with the Signet of the King to be propagated unto all following Generations For in the day that Adam was created all things were finished so that he was the Perfection and Complement of the whole workmanship of this world Therefore when he sinned the whole world sinned whose Sin we hear and suffer which is not so in the Sin of his Posterity To be sealed with the Signet of the King is their Expression of Gods Constitution And these words are very consonant to those of our Apostle Rom. 5.12 As by one man Sin entered into the World and Death by Sin so Death passed upon all men for that or because in him all have sinned To the same purpose speaks the Targum on Eccles. 7. v. 29. in the Copies followed by the Jayan and London Bibles for so the words are not in those of Buxtorf nor the Biblia Regia God made the First man upright and innocent before him but the Serpent and Eve seduced him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and gave cause why the day of Death should come on him and all the Inhabitants of the Earth And we can have no more Authentick Testimony of the Apprehensions of their antient Doctors than what their Targums afford us And therefore Joseph Albo in Scher Itharim expresly concludes lib. 1. chap. 11. that all the punishments relating unto Adam and Eve for their first Sin belong unto all mankind And whereas they fancy that some Persons spent their dayes without actual sin at least any such as should deserve Death they charge their Death on the guilt of the sin of Adam So the Targum on the last Chapter of Ruth And Hobed begat Jesse who was called Nachash and there was no iniquity or corruption in him for which he should be delivered into the hâ—nd of the Angel of Death to take his soul from him and he lived manâ— dayes untill the Counsell that the Serpent gave to Eve abode before the Lord and upon that Counsâ—ll were all the inhabitants of the Earth made guilty of death and upon the aâ—â—â—unt of that sin dyed Jesse the Righteous Lud. Capellus in his Annotations on John 3. hath an observation on this passage in the Targum not
the Effects of Satans Temptation and that to be wrought by the Messiah or as they speak in his dayes And hence they have a common saying that in the last dayes which is the Old Testament Periphrasis of the Dayes of the Messiah all things shall be healed but the Serpent and the Gibeonites by whom they understand all Hypocrites and Unbelievers Satan therefore is to be conquered by the bruising of his Head and conquered he is not nor can be unless his work be destroyed In the destruction of his work consists the Delivery of mankind from the twofold evil mentioned And this is to be effected by the seed of the Woman to be brought forth into the world unto that end and purpose For when the Production of this Seed is restrained unto the Family and Posterity of Abraham it is said expresly that in or by it all the Kindreds of the earth should be blessed which they could not be without a removal and taking away of the Curse We may now therefore take the summ of this Discourse and of the whole matter § 26 that we have insisted on about the Entrance of sin into the world and the Remedy provided in the Grace and Wisdom of God against it It appears upon our Enquiry First That the Sin of our First Parents was the Occasion and Cause of all that Evil which is in the world of all that is felt or justly feared by mankind For as those who knew not or received not the Revelation of the Truth in these things made unto us in the Scripture could never assign any other cause of it that might be satisfactory unto an ordinary rational Enquiry so the Testimonies of the Scripture make it most evident and especially that insisted on Secondly It hath been evinced tha◠mankind could not recover or deliver themselves from under the power of their own innate corruption and disorder nor from the effects of the Curse and Wrath of God that came upon them Neither is there any ground of Expectation of Relief from any other part of Gods Creation But yet that God for the praise of the glory of his Grace Mercy and Goodness would effect it and bring it about Thirdly That this Relief and Deliverance is first intimated and declared in those words of God unto the Serpent I will put Enmity between thee and the Woman and between thy seed and her seed it shall bruise thy head and thou shalt bruise his heel Which appears First Because in and with the Serpent Satan who was the Head of all Apostasie from God and by whom our first Parents were beguiled is intended in these words This we have made evident from the Confession of the Jews with whom in this matter principally we have to do And to what hath been already observed unto that purpose we may add the Testimonies of some other of them to the same Purpose Rabbi Bechai he whom they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Bechai the Elder in his Comment on the Law unto these words Gen. 3. v. 15. speaks to this purpose We have no more enmity with the Serpent than with other creeping things Wherefore the Scripture Mystically signifies him who was hid in the Serpent For the body of the crafty Serpent was a fit instrument for that force or vertue that joyned its self therewithall That was it which made Eve to sin whence death came on all her Posterity And this is the Enmity between the Serpent and the seed of the Woman And this is the Mysterie of the Holy Tongue that the Serpent is sometimes called Saraph according to the name of an Angel who is also called Saraph And now thou knowest that the Serpent is Satan and the evil Figment and the Angel of Death And Rabbi Judah in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Many Interpreters say that the Evil Figment hath all its force from the Old Serpent or Satan To the same purpose the Author of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caphtor Vapaerach The Devil and the Serpent are called by one name And many other Testimonies of the like importance might be collected out of them We have also asurer word for our own satisfaction in the Application of this place unto Satan in the Divine Writings of the New Testament as 2 Cor. 11.3 2 Tim. 2.14 Rom. 5.11 12 13 15. Heb. 2.14 15. 1 John 3.8 Revel 12.9 and Chap. 20. v. 2 3. but we forbear to press them on the Jews Besides it is most evident from the thing it self For 1. Who can be so sottish as to imagine that this great Alteration which ensued on the works of God that which caused him to pronounce them accursed and to inflict so sore a Punishment on Adam and all his Posterity should arise from the Actings of a Brute Creature Where is the glory of this dispensation How can we attribute it unto the Wisdom and Greatness of God What is there in it suitable unto his Righteousness and Holiness Whereas supposing this to be the work of him who was in himself the beginning of all Apostasie and who first brake the Law of his Creation all things answer the Excellency of the Divine Perfections Moreover is it imaginable that the nature of man then flourishing in the vigour of all its intellectual Abilities Reason Wisdom Knowledge in that Order and Rectitude of them which was his Grace should be surprized seduced and brought into subjection unto the Craft and Machinations of an inferiour Creature a Beast of the Field and that unto its own Ruine Temporal and Eternal The whole nature of the inferiour creatures James tells us is tamed by the nature of Man Chap. 3. v. 7. and that now in his lessened and depraved condition and shall we think that this Excellent Nature in the blossom of its strength and right unto Rule over all should be tamed corrupted subdued by the nature of a Beast or a Serpent And yet again whereas in the whole action of the Serpent there is an open design against the glory and honour of God with the welfare and happiness of mankind and that managed with Craft Subtilty and Forecast how can we imagine that such a contrivance should befall a brute Worm uncapable of Moral Evil and newly framed out of the dust by the power of its Creator Hitherto it had continued under the Law and Order of its Creation and shall we now think that suddenly on an instant it should engage thus desperately against God and man And further the actings of the Serpent were by Reason and with Speech And doth not a supposal that he was endowed with them plainly exempt him from that Order and kind of Creatures whereof he was and place him among the number of the intellectual and rationall parts of the Creation And is not this contrary to the Analogie of the Scripture and the open truth of the thing its self he being cursed among the Beasts of the Field To say as Aben Ezra seems to do that God gave him Reason
informs us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was a great Wise Man and one of the Wise Men of the Mishnae as his sayings in it manifest so that all the Wise men of that Generation followed him and took this Barcosba for their King and Mâ—ssiah And He first applyed unto him the Prophesie of Balaam Num. 24. v. 17. concerning the Star that should arise out of Jacob whereon they changed his name and called him Barchocheba or the Son of the Star or as some say that was his name at first whence the blind Rabbin took occasion to apply that Prediction unto him Concerning him also they interpreted the Prophesie of the Shilo and that also in Hâ—ggai about the shaking of the Heavens and the earth as they acknowledge in the Talmud in the place fore-cited This man therefore a Magician and a bloody Murderer by the common advise and Counsel of their Doctors and Wise men they gathered unto in multitudes and embraced as their Deliverer So soon as he had got strength and power he set himself to the work which they expected from their Messiah namely to conquer the Romans and to extirpate the Christians which last as Justin Martyr who lived near those dayes informs us he endeavoured with all Cruelty In the pursuit of this design he continued for three years and an half obstinately managing a bloody War against the Romans until the Impostor himself was slain their great Rabbi taken and tortured to death with iron Cards and such a devastation made of the whole Nation as that to this day they could never gather together in great numbers in any place of the world Maimonides tells us of this Barcosba whom they all received for their Messiah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the Wise men required of him neither Sign nor Wonder that is no miracle but others of them report that he caused Fire to come out of his mouth with other diabolical delusions fit to deceive a poor blinded credulous multitude And the Opinion of Maimonides that they look for no Miracles from the Messiah seems to be vented on purpose to obviate the plea of the Christians from the Miracles wrought by the Lord Jesus and is contrary unto the constant perswasion of most of their Masters and his own judgement declared in other places And the Targum its self in Hâ—b 3. v. 18. hath these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of the Miraculous Signs and Redemption that thou shalt work for or by thy Messiah So they call the Miracles wrought at their coming out of Aegypt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 see Hos. 2.15 Targum And on this ground do they studiously and wickedly endeavour to stain by any means the Glory of the Miracles of the Lord Jesus But the end of this Impostor who probably was intended in those words of our Saviour John 5.43 if another come in his own name him will ye receive hath proved the shame and reproach of their hopes and expectations unto all Generations From this time forward the remaining Jews with their Posterity utterly rejected § 7 the faith of their Father Abraham and of the rest of their Progenitors who thereby obtained a good report and this Testimony that they pleased God A Messiah that should be promised unto Adam the common Father of us all one that should be a Spiritual Redeemer from sin and misery a Goel or Redeemer from Death and Wrath a Peace-maker between God and man one that should work out everlasting Salvation the great blessing wherein all the Nations of the Earth were to have an interest a spiritual and eternal Prophet Priest and King God and man in one Person they neither looked for any more nor desired A temporal King and Deliverer promised unto themselves alone to give them Ease Dominion Wealth and Power they would now have or none at all They would not think it thank-worthy towards God himself to send them a Messiah to deliver them from sin And in their expectations of such a one after they had been well wearied with many frustrations they were as was said in their adherence unto Barcosbi almost extirpated from the face of the earth only God in his Providence who hath yet another work to accomplish towards them hath preserved them a Remnant unto his Glory In this condition some of them began to deny that there was any Messiah to be expected § 8 or looked for This opinion is ascribed in the Talmud unto Rabbi Hillel lib. Sand. Câ—p. Chelek This was not that Hilâ—el whom they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Elder the famous Master of Traditions who with Shammai lived under the second Temple but another of whom some say that he was the Son of Gamaliel others more probably that he lived a long time after those dayes But when ever he lived they say of him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rabbi Hillel said A Messiah shall not be given unto Israel for they enjoyed him in the dayes of Hezekiah This was a fruit of their applying that Prophesie of Isaiah Chap. 9. v. 5 6. unto Hezekiah for if he was intended therein he was unquestionably the only Messiah But it doth not appear that this opinion was much followed for a great dispute arose amongst them whither Hillel were not to be esteemed an Apostate and to have lost his interest in the world to come by this Opinion Those who following Maimonides make the Article of the coming of the Messiah one of the Fundamentals of the Law are greatly offended at him but he is more gently treated by Joseph Albo Sepher Ikkarim Orat. 1. on the account that this Article is not fundamental but only one branch of the great Root of Reward and Punishments Abarbinel goes another way to excuse him but generally they all condemn his Opinion In this Perswasion then that a Messiah is promised and shall come they all continue But whereas as was before observed they have utterly rejected the Faith and Light of the Church of old they have in their Talmuds and Ages ensuing their Composition coyned so many foolish imaginations concerning Him his Person Work Office Kingdom Life Continuance and Succession as are endless to recount But yet that the Reader may in them consider the wofull condition of men rejected of God cast out of his Covenant and bereaved of his Spirit and withall of how little use the Letter of the Old Testament is unto the vain minds of men wholly destitute of Divine Illumination and Grace and also learn what is that present Perswasion of the Jews which they prefer before the faith of their Fore-fathers and what they conceive of that Messiah for whose sake they reject him in whom alone there is Salvation I shall give an account of the most important heads of their Opinions and conjectures about him as also of the principal occasions of their being hardened in their impenitency and unbelief Our Apostle tells us 1 Tim. 3. v. 16. That without Controversie
instance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So they did to the Son of Stada and they hanged him on the Eve of the Passeover The Witnesses they speak of are no others but the false witnesses mentioned Matt. 26.60 61. The kind of his death hanged on a Tree with the time of it the Eve of the Passeover do also fully make naked their intentions The Age only or the time of his life remains from whence any difficulty is pretended This Jesus the Son of Pandira they have affirmed to have lived in the dayes of Alexander and to have been crucified in the dayes of Aristobulus an hundred or an hundred and ten years before the birth of Christ. But the mysterie of this Fiction also is discovered by Abraham Levita in his Cabala Historiae He tells us that the Christians placed the death of their Christ under Pilate that so they might shew that the destruction of the City and Temple fâ—ll out not long after his death whereas he sayes it is apparent from the Mishna and Talmud that he was crucified in the dayes of the Maccabes an hundred years before And here we have unawares the sore discovered and the true reason laid open why the Talmudists attempted to transferr the time of his death from the dayes of Herod the Tetrarch to the Rule of Aristobulus the Hasmonaean namely lest they should be compelled to acknowledge their utter ruine to have so suddenly ensued upon their rejection of him as indeed it did However as to our present purpose we have in general this confession of our Adversaries themselves that the Lord Jesus came before the destruction of the City and Temple which was that we undertook to confirm We Secondly In the pursuit of our Argument affirmed that no other person came § 7 at or within the time limited that could pretend to be the Messiah This the Jews themselves confess nor can they think otherwise without destroying themselves For if any such person came seeing they received him not nor do own him unto this day Their guilt would be the same that we charge upon them for the refusing of our Lord Jesus There is no need then that we should go over the Tragical Stories of Barchocheba Moses Cretensis David el David and such other Imposters For whereas none of them came or lived within the time determined so they are all disclaimed by themselves as Seducers and Causers of great misery unto their people and Nation Herein then we have the consent of all parties concerned which renders all further evidence unnecessary From what therefore hath been spoken and disputed It remaineth that either § 8 our Lord Jesus was and is the true Messiah as coming from God in the season limited for that purpose or that the whole promise concerning the Messiah is a meer figment the whole Old Testament a Fable and so both the old and present Religion of the Jews a delusion At that season the Messiah must come or there is an end of all Religion If any came then whom they had rather embrace for their Messiah then our Lord Jesus let them do so and own him that we may know who he was and what he hath done for them If none such there were that can be so esteemed as in truth and as themselves universally acknowledge there was not their obstinacy and blindness in refusing the only promised Messiah is such as no reasonable man can give an account of who doth not call to mind the righteous Judgement of God in giving them up to blindness and obstinacy as a just punishment for their rejection and murthering his only Son And this Argument is of such importance as that with the consideration of the Doctrine of Christ and his success in the world it may well be allowed to stand alone in this contest Our second Argument is taken from those Characteristical notes that are given in § 9 the Scripture of the Messiah Now these are such as by which the Church might know him and upon which they were bound to receive him All these we shall find to agree and center in the person of our Lord Jesus Some of the principal of them we shall therefore insist upon and vindicate from the exceptions of the Jews The stock whereof he came the place and manner of his Birth the course of his life and death what he taught and what he suffered are the principal of those signs and notes that God gave out to discover the Messiah in his appointed time and as they were very sufficient for that purpose So upon the matter they comprise all the signs and tokens whereby any person may be predesigned and signified First For the Family Stock or lineage whereof he was to come There was a threefold § 10 restitution of it after the promise had for a long time run in general that he should be of the seed of the Woman or take his nature from among mankind The first was unto the seed of Abraham Gen. 15.17 and under that alone there was no more required but that he should spring from among his posterity untill God added that peculiar limitation unto it in Isaac shall thy seed be called Gen. 21.12 After this in the Family of Isaac Jacob peculiarly inherited the promise and his posterity being branched into twelve Tribes or Families the rise or nativity of the Messiah was confined unto the Tribe of Judah Gen. 49.10 This made it further necessary that from him by some one of the numerous families that sprang of him he should proceed Out of that Tribe God afterwards raised the Kingly Family of David to be a Type and representation of the Kingdom of the Messiah and hereupon he restrained the promise unto that familie though not unto any particular branch of it Hereunto no other restriction was ever afterwards added It was not then at any time made necessary by promise that the Messiah should proceed from the Royal branch or familie of the House of David but only that he should be born of some of his posterity by what family soever poor or rich in power or subjection he derived his Genealogie from him His Kingdom was to be quite of anothâ—r nature thâ—n that of David or Solomon nor did he derive his Title in the least thâ—reunto from the right of the Davidical House to the Kingdom of Judah Thus far then it pleased God to design this Stock and Family of the Messiah He was to be of the posterity of Abraham of the Tribe of Judah of the family of David And although this evidence in its latitude will conclude only thus far that no one can be pretended to be the Messiah whose Genealogie is not so derived by David and Judah unto Abraham yet by the addition of this circumstance in the Providence of God that no one since the destruction of the City and Temple can plead or demonstrate that original seeing this was given out for a note and sign to know him by it proves
see c. Considering therefore what is elsewhere written of all the Regions about bringing in their sick weak and impotent and of the cures of Persons by the touching of his garment it is evident that his Personal Miracles amounted unto thousands which might well give occasion to the Hyperbole used by John in recounting of them Hence some among the Jews were convinced that he was the Messiah not only by the greatness but also by the number of his works John 7.31 Many of the People believed on him and said when Christ cometh will he do more Miracles then these which this man doeth And what are the seventy six Miracles of Moses unto those as to number which in the first place the Jews glory in And if we may add those which were wrought by his power by them that preached the Gospel on his Commission as they are all of the same efficacy unto the end proposed or confirmation of his being the Messiah they amount not unto thousands only but probably unto millions For of this sort were all the miraculous gifts of the Holy Ghost that were granted unto the Church all the world over So that as to the number of Miracles he was sufficiently by them attested unto to be the Messiah the great Law-giver of the people of the New Covenant Again The Jews much insist on this that all other Prophets wrought Miracles by § 64 the Intervention of Prayer Moses alone without it at his own pleasure The Rod they say was committed unto him as a Kingly Scepter to denote that Authority whereunto the whole nature of things gave place It is true indeed it is not recorded that Moses prayed in words before every Miracle that was wrought by him or in reference unto his Ministry but yet this is plain in story that he wrought no mighty work but either upon his prayer or some express command and direction from God in particular which everts the Judaical pretence of an abiding power remaining with him enabling him to work Miracles when and how he would But this which they falsly ascribe unto Moses was eminently true in the Lord Jesus Those thousands of miraculous works which he wrought were the arbitrary effects of a word of command without any especial direction for every new work arguing the constant presence of an infinite power with him exerted according to his will Come forth of him come out of the grave I will be thou clean be ye opened and the like expressions he used as signs and pledges thereof Thus was it not with Moses as the story manifests yea he himself greatly doubted of the greatest effect of the Divine power put forth by him when he smote the Rock to bring forth water The nature of the Miracles also wrought by the one and the other may be compared § 65 and we shall see from thence on which side the pre-eminence will be found For those wrought by Moses or by God himself whilest he employed him in the service of giving the Law and the delivery of the people they were for the most part portentous Prodigies suited to fill men with wonder astonishment and fear Such were all the signs of the presence of God on Mount Sinai The effects also of most of them were evil and destructive proceeding from wrath and indignation against sin and sinners such were all the mighty works wrought in Aegypt such those of the swallowing up of Dathan and Abiram in the Wilderness Those that tended unto the good and relief of mankind as the bringing of water from the rock were typical and occasional And those kinds of works were suited unto that Ministry of Death and Condemnation which was committed unto him But on the other side the mighty works of the Lord Jesus were evidently effects of Goodness as well as of Power and consisted in things useful and helpful unto mankind Healing the sick opening the eyes of the blind and ears of the deaf giving strength to the lame casting out of Devils feeding hungry multitudes raising the dead are things amiable and useful And though terrible Prodigies may more affect and astonish carnal minds such as the Jews were filled with yet these works of Grace and Goodness do more allure those who attend unto the dictates of right Reason Evidences they were of a gracious Ministry tending unto salvation and peace in every kind such as that of the Messiah was promised and foretold to be As Miracles then were the tokens of their several Ministries and bespake the nature of them those of the Lord Christ were exceedingly more excellent then those of Moses § 66 Furthermore as Moses had not a power of working miracles constantly resident with him which he might exert according unto his own will so he was very far from being able to communicate any such power unto others God indeed took of the Spirit that was on him and gave it unto the Elders that were to be joyned with him in the Government of the people Numb 11.25 but yet neither was there a power of working miracles going along with that Spirit but only ability for Rule and Government nor yet was that communication of it any act of Moses at all But now our Lord Jesus as he had the Divine Power mentioned alwayes with him so he could give Authority and Power unto whom he pleased to effect all such miraculous works as were any way necessary for the confirmation of their Doctrine Of this nature was the Commission which he gave the Twelve when he sent them forth Matth. 10.8 Heal the sick cleanse the Lepers raise the dead cast out Devils As also that unto the LXX Luke 10.17 19. yea he promised them which also came to pass that by his power and presence with them they should do greater things then those which they had seen him to do John 14.12 Mark 16.17 And this difference is so eminent that nothing can be objected against it This more evidently confirmed him to be the Master then all the mighty works which he wrought in his own Person on the earth § 67 Again all the miracles of Moses ended with his life The Jews indeed some of them tell us a company of foolish stories about his death which as their manner is they would fix on those words Deut. 34.5 and Moses dyed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the mouth or word of the Lord as namely how he contended with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Angel of Death and drove him away with his rod so that he could not dye until God laid his mouth unto his and so took out his soul from him But these figments are shamefull and such as become none but themselves However these things extended only unto his death therewith ended his Ministry and Miracles But now the greatest Miracle of our Lord Jesus was wrought by him after the violent and cruel death which he underwent for our sakes For he took his life again and raised himself from the dead John
that shall ensue thereupon Set aside their opinion concerning the perpetuity of the Ceremonial Law and their return in the observation of it unto their carnal Ordinances built on a supposition that God is pleased with the blood of Bulls and Goats for its own sake and not for a signification of that which was infinitely more excellent and glorious an apprehension which the whole world hath as it were by joint consent long ago renounced and cast away the vain and foolish imaginations about their sensual pleasures Behemoth the Wine of Paradice and literal accomplishment of professed Allegories which the wisest among themselves begin to be ashamed of and there is nothing in their own expectations but we acknowledge that they shall be made partakers of it Return they shall to their own Land enjoy it for a quiet and everlasting possession their Adversaries being destroyed filled they shall be also with the Light and Knowledge of the Will and Worship of God so as to be a guide and blessing unto the residue of the Gentiles who seek after the Lord and it may be be entrusted with great Empire and Rule in the world The most of these things are foretold concerning them not only in their own Prophetical Writings but also by the Divine Writers of sundry Books of the New Testament But all this we say must come to pass when the veil shall be taken from before their eyes and they shall look on him whom they have pierced and joyfully receive him whom they have sinfully rejected for so many Generations Untill this be done they may wrestleâ—s they can with their own perplexities and comfort themselves as well as they are able in their miseries get money in their dispersions by all unlawfull Arts and ways imaginable and expose themselves to the delusions of Impostors false Prophets and pretenders to be their Deliverers which to their unspeakable misery and reproach they have now done ten times deliverance peace tranquility acceptance with God and man they shall not obtain Here lyes the Crisis of their condition When they shall receive acknowledge and believe in that Messiah who came so long time since unto them whom their Fathers wickedly slew and hanged on a Tree and whom themselves have since no less wickedly rejected and when by his Spirit and Grace they shall be turned from ungodliness and have their eyes opened to see the Mysterie of the Grace Wisdom and Love of God in the blood of his Son then shall they obtain mercy from the God of their fore-fathers and returning again into their own Land Jerusalem shall be inhabited again even in Jerusalem Exercitatio XIX Ordinances and Institutions of the Judaical Church respected and unfolded in the Epistle to the Hebrews Principal Heads of them mentioned therein The call of Abraham Heb. 11.8 9 c. The foundation of the Church in his Posterity The name of Abram signification of it Changed into Abraham its signification The time of his Birth and Death Whence called Ur of the Chaldees where And Haran Extent of Mesopotamia Moses and Stephen reconciled Abraham before his call infected with Idolatry Time of his call Institution of Circumcision End and use of it Time of the Israelites sojourning in Egypt Gen. 11.13 Exod. 12.40 41. Act. 7.6 Gal. 3 17. reconciled The beginning and ending of the 430 years The Fatal period of Changes in that Church Institution of the Passover The time of its celebration The month Time of the day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 between the Evenings when The occasion and nature of this Ordinance The matter of it The manner of its observance Sundry things suited to its first celebration not afterward observed The number required at the eating of the Lamb. By whom it was killed Where How dressed Jews traditions rejected The Feast of unleavened Bread Its Rites Excision to the neglect of what Ordinances annexed Jews acknowledge the figurative nature of this Ordinance Of Frontlets and Philacteries Exod. 23.9 Signes and memorials The sections of the Law written in the Frontlets The Jews manner of making their Phylacteries deceits therein Their trust in them so proved by our Saviour Of their Fringes their appointment making and use Dedication of the first-born males to God Price of the Redemption of Children Close of God's first dispensation towards that Church The solemn 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Preparations for it Remote Occasional temporary institutions between the Red-sea and Sinai Of the waters of Marah The giving of Manna Derivation and signification of the name Water brought out of the Rock That Rock Christ. Immediate preparations for the receiving of the Law The time that the people came to Sinai The Day The time of the day that the appearance of God's Glory began The same time that Christ rose from the dead The place Sinai the name of the mountain Horeb of the Wilderness Of the Monastery there Moses first Ascent The ground of it The people prepared by the remembrance of Mercies and Promises Of their washing their cloaths Not a Baptism of standing use Bounds set unto the Mount In what sense it might be touched Heb. 12.21 How the Offendor was to be punished 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opened The station and order of the people in receiving of the Law The ministry of Angels in the preparations for God's glorious presence How the People met God and God them When Moses used those words I exceedingly fear and quake THere are in the Epistle unto the Hebrews either direct discourses concerning § 1 or occasional mention is made of all or at least the most important things in the whole Mosaical Oeconomy and state of the Church and Worship of God therein under the Old Testament Yea there is nothing material from the call of Abraham unto the utmost issue of God's dispensations towards his posterity that is omitted by him And if we have not a previous acquaintance with these things which he supposed in them to whom he wrote much darkness and many mistakes must needs attend us in the consideration of what he treateth on and the ends which he proposeth unto himself Now because it will no way be expedient every time the mention of them doth occur or allusion is made unto them to insist upon them as first instituted I thought meet in the close of these Prolegomena to present the Reader with a brief Scheme and delineation of the whole Mosaical Oeconomy as also of those other previous concernments of the Church in the posterity of Abraham which by the Apostle in this Epistle we are called and directed unto And they are these that follow 1. The call and obedience of Abraham chap. 11. v. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17. 2. The institution and observation of the Passover chap. 11. v. 28. 3. The giving of the Law chap. 1. v. 1. chap. 2. v. 1. chap. 12. v. 18 19 20 21 25 26. 4. The sanction of the Law in Promises and Penalties chap. 2. v. 2 21.
of Heber keeping their first Seat not accompanying the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Sons of men Gen. 11.2 3 4. those wicked Apostates who went from the East to find a place to fix the Seat of their Rebellion against God Broughton contendeth that Vr was in the Vale of the Chaldaeans that is in Babylonia a very little way or some few miles from Charan averring that Stephen cannot otherwise be defended who affirms that he was in Mesopotamia before he dwelt in Charan But as this defence of Stephen is needless seeing as we have manifested he took Mesopotamia in a large sense as others did also giving the same Extent unto it with Assyria the denomination arising from the most eminent and fruitful of these Regions So the removal of a little way or a few miles answereth not that decription which the Holy Ghost gives us of journey Gen. 11.31 And Terah took Abraham his Son and Lot the Son of Haran and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees to go into the Land of Canaan and they came unto Haran and dwelt there There design was to go unto Canaan And as the Vra which was in Babylonia was scituated on this side of Euphrates as Pliny testifies So that Abraham could not go from thence unto Canaan by Haran but he must twice needlesly pass with all his family over Euphrates so the expression of their journying to Haran will not suit unto any imaginary Vr within a few miles of it Nor is it any weight that it is called Vr of the Chaldees whose proper seat was in Babylonia and not extended much farther Eastward seeing if the Chaldees as is most probable were called Chasdim as they are constantly from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chesed the Son of Nachor the Brother of Abraham there must of necessity be allowed an Hystorical Prolepsis in the words and that is called Vr of the Chaldees from whence the Chaldees were afterwards to have their Original who in time possessed Babylonia and the parts adjacent Whilest Abraham lived with his Progenitors in Vr there is no doubt but he § 7 was with them infected with much false Worship and Idolatry For so Joshua affirms expresly that they served 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chap. 24.3 even those whose Worship God afterwards prohibited in the first Precept of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there shall not be unto thee other Gods those or such as those whom they served beyond the flood Other Gods are all false gods The Jews imagination about the discovery made by Abraham of the true God his renunciation of all Idolatry thereon with the breaking of his Fathers Images and his being cast for that cause by Nimrod into the fire all about the forty fourth year of his Age I have considered and exploded elsewhere And all these figments with that of Harans being consumed by fire in the sight of his Father they witedraw from the supposed signification of the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they would have to signifie fire Gen. 11.28 but as where it relates unto the Chaldeans Vr of the Chaldees it is apparently the name of a place a Town or Country so it rather signifies a Valley then fire And those words Isa. 24. v. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate in the Text Wherefore glorifie ye the Lord in the fires may be better read as in the Margen in the Valleys which better answers unto the following words And the name of the Lord God of Israel in the Isles of the Sea At what year of his age he left Vr with his Father is not expressed But it is apparent that it was towards the latter end of the life of Terah Even after the death of Haran his Eldest Son and that Nahor and Abraham were married to Milcha and Isca his daughters and Sara had continued barren some remarkable space of time Gen. 11.28 29 30 31 32. From Vr therefore with his Father and the rest of their family he removed to § 8 Haran with a design for Canaan Gen. 11.31 Where this Haran was scituated we before declared Stephen calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 charran and so do the Latin Writers Assyrias Latio maculavit sanguine Charras sayes Lucan of the overthrow of Crassus's Army near that place And it may be pronounced either way in the Original from the ambiguous force of the Hebrew Cheth which seems best expressed by Charan How long he stayed here is uncertain as was said before That it was not very long appears from his marrying and the barrenness of Sarah before he came thither And yet that they abode there some years is no less evident from Chap. 12. v. 5. Abraham took Sarai his Wife and Lot his Brothers Son and all their substance that they had gathered and the souls or Servants that they had gotten in Haran and they went forth to go into the Land of Canaan It is not the work of a few dayes or moneths that is here described This gathering of substance and getting of souls was a business of some years of how many it is uncertain What was the design of Terah in his attempt to go for the Land of Canaan is not absolutely certain The especial Call of Abraham unto that Countrey could not be the bottom of it for it is most probable yea indeed undeniable that this he had not untill after the death of Terah It was therefore an act of theirs in answer to the Providence of God in a subserviency unto that future call that he might be in more readiness to yield obedience unto it then he could have been in the Land of Vr Whether Terah did meerly seek a new habitation in a Country less peopled then that of his Nativity which doubtless then was the most populous part of the world as being near the place where mankind first planted after the flood or whether he might be instructed in the antient promise that the posterity of Canaan the Son of Cham who had then possessed the Country called after his name should be servants unto the seed of Shem from whom he was a principal descendant I know not In answer to the call of Abraham it could not be for he was called to leave his Fathers House Chap. 12.1 and not to bring his Father with his houshold with him and that at the seventy fifth year of his age when Terah was dead But what ever was the occasion of it the Providence of God used in it in the serving of its designs towards Abraham And here in Haran If I may be allowed to conjecture it is probable that God gave him light into the evil of those Superstitions wherein he was educated revealed himself as the only true God and so prepared him for his Call unto the tedious journeying and long peregrination that ensued thereon § 9 When his Father Terah was dead and himself seventy five years old Chap. 12.14 God called him to himself and entred
〈◊〉 is both to differ and excel but the differentius of the Vulgar yields no good sense in this place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haereditavit sortitus est jure hereditario obtinuit of the importance of which word before Being in so much preferred exalted made eminent above Angels as he obtained inherited a more excellent name than they There are five things considerable in and for the Exposition of these words First What it is that the Apostle asserts in them as his general Proposition namely that the Son as the great Priest and Prophet of the Church was preferred above and made more glorious and powerful than the Angels and how this was done and wherein it doth consist Secondly When he was so preferred above them which belongs unto the Explication and right understanding of the former Thirdly The Degree of this preference of him above the Angels intimated in the comparison being by so much made more excellent as he hath c. Fourthly The Proof of the Assertion both absolutely and as to the Degree intimated and this is taken from his Name Fifthly The way whereby he came to have this Name he obtained it as his lot and portion or he inherited it First He is made more excellent than the Angels preferred above them that is say some declared so to be Tum res dicitur fieri cum incipit patesieri Frequently in tho Scripture a thing is then said to be made or to be when it is manifested so to be And in this sense the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes used Rom. 3.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let God be true and every man a liar that is manifested and acknowledged so to be So James 1.12 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that is approved in trial and thereby manifested to be sincere and sound In this sense the Apostle tells us Rom. 1.3 that the Lord Christ was declared to be the Son of God by the resurrection from the dead The resurrection from the dead did not make him to be the Son of God but evidently manifested and declared him so to be According to this interpretation of the words that which the holy Ghost intimateth is That whereas the Lord Christ ministred in an outwardly low condition in this world whilst he purged our sins yet by his sitting down at the right hand of God he was revealed manifested declared to be more excellent than all the Angels in heaven But I see no reason why we should desert the proper and most usual signification of the word nothing in the Context perswading us so to do Besides this suits not the Apostles design who doth not prove from the Scripture that the Lord Christ was manifested to be more excellent than the Angels but that really he was preferred and exalted above them So then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as preferred exalted actually placed in more Power Glory Dignity than the Angels This John Baptist affirms of him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He was preferred before me because he was before me Preferred above him called to another manner of Office than that which John ministred in made before or above him in Dignity because he was before him in Nature and Existence And this is the proper sense of the words The Lord Jesus Christ the Revealer of the Will of God in the Gospel is exalted above preferred before made more excellent and glorious than the Angels themselves all or any of them who ministred unto the Lord in the giving of the Law on mount Sinai Some object unto this Interpretation That he who is said to be made or set above the Angels is supposed to have been lower than they before To which I answer And so he was not in respect of Essence Subsistence and real Dignity but in respect of the infirmities and sufferings that he was exposed unto in the discharge of his word here on the earth as the Apostle expresly declares chap. 2.9 2. And this gives us light into our second enquiry on these words namely When it was that Christ was thus exalted above the Angels 1. Some say that it was in the time of his Incarnation for then the Humane Nature being taken into Personal subsistence with the Son of God it became more excellent than that of the Angels This sense is fixed on by some of the Antients who are followed by sundry Modern Expositors But we have proved before that it is not of either Nature of Christ absolutely or abstractedly that the Apostle here speaketh nor of his Person but as vested with his Office and discharging of it And moreover the Incarnation of Christ was part of his Humiliation and Exinanition and is not therefore especially intended where his Exaltation and Glory is expresly spoken of 2. Some say that it was at the time of his Baptism when he was anointed with the Spirit for the discharge of his Prophetical Office Isa. 60.1 2. But yet neither can this Designation of the time be allowed And that because the main things wherein he was made lower than the Angels as his temptations and sufferings and death it self did follow his Baptism and Unction 3. It must therefore be the time of his Resurrection Ascension and Exaltation at the Right hand of God which ensued thereon that is designed as the season wherein he was made more excellent than the Angels as evidently appears from the Text and Context For 1. That was the Time as we have shewed before when he was gloriously vested with that All Power in heaven and earth which was of old designed unto him and prepared for him 2. The Order also of the Apostles discourse leads us to fix on this season After he had by himself purged our sins he sat down c. Being made so much more excellent that is therein and then he was so made 3. The Testimony in the first place produced by the Apostle in the confirmation of his Assertion is elsewhere as we shall see applied by himself unto his Resurrection and the Glory that ensued and consequently they are also in this place intended 4. This Preference of the Lord Christ above the Angels is plainly included in that Grant of All Power made unto him Matth. 28.18 expounded Ephes. 1.21 22. 5. The Testimony used by the Apostle in the first place is the word that God spake unto his King when he set him upon his holy Hill of Sion Psal. 2.6 7 8. which typically expresseth his glorious Enstalment in his heavenly Kingdom The Lord Christ then who in respect of his Divine Nature was always infinitely and incomparably himself more excellent than all the Angels after his Humiliation in the Assumption of the Humane Nature with the sufferings and temptations that he underwent upon his Resurrection was exalted into a condition of Glory Power Authority and Excellency and entrusted with Power over them as our Apostle here informs us 3. In this Preference and Exaltation of the Lord Christ there is
and Ends of it that it no way takes off from the evidence of their subordination and subjection unto him And with this Demonstration the Apostle closeth the Argument he had so long insistâ—d on Of the nature of this Ministery of Angels for the good of them that shall inherit salvation because it belongs not directly unto the present design of the Apostle and would in the full consideration of it cause a long diversion from the work in hand I shall not treat although it be a matter singularly deserving our meditation For the present it may suffice us to observe That in the government and protection of his Saints here below both as to the dispensation of Grace and Providence God is pleased to make use of the Ministery of Angels wherein much of their Honour and our Safety doth consist For a close of the whole we may only observe the Way and Manner whereby the Apostle proposeth this doctrine of the Ministery of Angels unto the Hebrews Are they not saith he he speaks of it as a matter well known unto them and acknowledged by them Their Nature their Dignity their Office was declared in the Old Testament Thence were they instructed that as to their Nature they were Spirits in Dignity Thrones Principalities and Powers in Office Ministers unto God sent out for the good of his Church And therefore these things the Apostle in sundry places takes for granted as those that were already known and received in the Church of God Rom. 8. v. 32. Ephes. 1. v. 20 21. Col. 1. v. 16. This Doctrine then I say was propagated from the Jews unto the Christians And from them also came forth much of that curiosity and superstition about Angels which afterwards infected the minds of many in the Christian Church For after they were forsaken of God and began to give up themselves unto vain speculations there was not any thing wherein the vanity of their minds did more early manifest it self than in their imaginations about Angels wherein they exercise themselves unto this day For to omit their monstrous figments about the Original of Devils most of whom they affirm to have been begotten by Adam on Lilith before God formed Eve and many to have issued from Adam and Eve severally whilst they lived separate an 150 years after the death of Abel as later follies it is certain that some of them began to vent curiosities about Angels in the Apostles time Col. 2.18 and to express their fancies about their Names Orders Degrees and Employments And this they continue yet to do although they peremptorily deny that they are to be invocated or prayed unto wherein they are out-done by others Names they have invented for them innumerable and those many of them uncouth and insignificant Orders also or Degrees they assign unto them some four some five some seven some nine some thirteen according as it hath seemed good unto this or that Great Master among them From them the Pseudodionysius about the fourth or fifth Century after Christ took the occasion and rise of his operous figment about the Celestial Hierarchy though he mixed their inventions with many Peripatetical and Pythagorean notions Aristotle proportioned the number of the Intelligencies unto the Spheres of the Heavens more he granted not The Pythagoreans and Platonicks asserted all things here below to be influenced by the Planets in their Orbs the inferiour receiving a communication of vertue from the higher and imparting it unto them beneath So they interpreted the Exsection of Saturn by Jupiter as that of Coelum by Saturn to be the interception of their procreative influence that it should not immediately be communicated unto things below but by them Out of all these fancies did Dionysius raise his Hierarchy From the Jews he took the Disposition of his Angels into Orders of Superiority and Rule from Aristotle their number placing an Order instead of a single Intelligence to answer what is taught in the Scripture concerning their multitude and from the Pythagorean Platonicks the communication of Light Knowledge and Illumination from God by the highest to the lowest Series or Order and from them to Men on earth And on this foundation such as it is are built the Discourses of many Commentators on this place in their Enquiries whether Angels of the Superiour Orders are sent forth to minister for the good of Believers which is denied by many though by some later Expositors as Estius Ribera Tena A Lapide granted and proved not without much ado So hard is it sometimes for men to cast down sear-crows of their own setting up It remaineth only that we close our whose discourses on this Chapter with some Observations for our own use and instruction from this last Verse as 1. The highest Honour of the most glorious Spirits in Heaven is to minister unto the Lord in the service whereunto he appoints them This is the Office this the work of Angels and this is their Honour and Glory For what greater Honour can a Creature be more partaker of than to be emploied in the service of his Creator What greater glory than to stand in the Presence and to do the Will of the King of Heaven If it be an Honour on earth to stand before Princes dying perishing men and that unto men in nature and kind equal unto those before whom they stand what is it for them who by nature are at an infinite distance from the Glory of God to stand before him who lives for ever and ever And surely it will be unconceivably woful unto poor souls at the last day to find how they despised in this world a share and interest in that service which is and ever was the Glory and Honour of Angels 2. Such is the love and care of God towards his Saints labouring here below that he sends the most glorious Attendants on his Throne to minister unto him in taking care of them He who gave his only Son for them will not spare to send his holy Angels unto them Heaven and earth shall be witnesses of his care of them and the value that he puts upon them Now this being a matter of so great importance as it is unto the Churches consolation and the Doctrine directly taught in the Text we may a little farther enquire into it in answer unto these two Questions First Wherefore God is pleased to use the Ministry of Angels in the dispensation of his care and good will unto the Church the Heirs of salvation seeing he can by an Almighty facility exert all the effects of it by his own immediate Power Secondly Vnto what especial end and purpose doth God make use of the Ministery of Angels for the good of them that believe For the first of these the principal account of it is to be resolved into his own Sovereign Will Wisdom and Pleasure Thus are we always to live in an holy Admiration of him when ever we consider any of his works or ways Rom. 11.
the Covenant between him and the people that the Transgression of it so as to disannul the terms and conditions of it had by Divine Constitution the punishment of death temporal or Excision appointed unto it And this in the next words he proceeds to improve unto his purpose by the way of an Argument à minori ad majus How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation c. There is an Antithesis expressed in one branch as we observed before between the Law and the Gospel namely that the Law was the Word spoken by Angels the Gospel being revealed by the Lord himself But there are also other differences intimated between them though expressed only on the part of the Gospel as that it is in its nature or Effects Great Salvation that is not absolutely only but comparatively unto the benefit exhibited to their fore Fathers by the Law as given on Mount Horeb. The confirmation also of the Gospel by the Testimony of God is tacitely opposed unto the confirmation of the Law by the like Witness and from all these considerations doth the Apostle enforce his Argument proving the Punishment that shall befall Gospel neglecters In the words as was in part before observed there occurrs 1. The Subject matter spoken of so great salvation 2 A further Description of it 1. From its principal Author it began to be spoken by the Lord. 2. From the manner of its propagation it was confirmed unto us by them that heard it 3. From its Confirmation by the Testimony of God Which 4. Is exemplified by a distribution into 1. Signs 2. Wonders 3. Mighty Works and 4. Various Gifts of the Holy Ghost whereof there is 3. A neglect supposed if we neglect and 4. Punishment there intimated wherein 1. The Punishment its self and 2. The manner of its expression how shall we escape are to be considered all which are to be severally explained 1. The subject matter treated of is expressed in those words so great Salvation And it is the Gospel which is intended in that Expression as is evident from the preceding Verse For that which is there called the word which we have heard is here called great salvation As also from the following words where it is said to be declared by the Lord and farther propagated by them that heard him And the Gospel is called Salvation by a Metonymy of the Effect for the Cause For it is the Grace of God bringing salvation Titus 2.11 The Word that is able to save us The Doctrine the Discovery the instrumentally efficient Cause of Salvation Rom. 1.16 1 Cor. 1.20 21. And this Salvation the Apostle calls Great upon many accounts which we shall afterwards unfold And calling it so great salvation he refers them unto the Doctrine of it wherein they had been instructed 〈◊〉 whereby the Excellency of the Salvation which it brings is declared Now though the Apostle might 〈…〉 pressed the Gospel by the word which was declared unto us by the Lord as 〈…〉 the Law by the word spoken by Angels yet to strengthen his Argument 〈◊〉 Moâ—â—â— unto Obedience which he insists upon he chose to give a brief Description of iâ— from its principal Effect it is great Salvation The Law by reason of sin proved the Ministry of Death and Condemnation 2 Cor. 3.9 yet being fully published only by Angels Obedience was indispensibly required unto it And shall not the Gospel the Ministry of life and great salvation be attended unto 2. He farther describes the Gospel from its principal Author or Revealer it began to be spoken by the Lord. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The words may have a twofold sense for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may denote either principium temporis the beginning of time or principium operis the beginning of the work In the first way it asserts that the Lord himself was the first Preacher of the Gospel before he sent or employed his Apostles and Disciples in the same work In the latter that he only began the work leaving the perfecting and finishing of it unto those who were chosen and enabled by him unto that end And this latter sense is also true for he finished not the whole Declaration of the Gospel in his own person teaching vivâ voce but committed the work unto his Apostles Matth. 10.27 But their teaching from him being expressed in the next words I take the words in the first sense referring unto what he had delivered Chap. 1.1 Of Gods speaking in these last dayes in the Person of the Son Now the Gospel hath had a threefold beginning of its Declaration First In Prediction by Promises and Types and so it began to be declared from the foundation of the world Luke 1.70 71. Secondly In an immediate Preparation and so it began to be declared in and by the Ministry of John the Baptist Mark 1.1 2. Thirdly In its open clear actual full Revelation so this work was begun by the Lord himself and carried on to perfection by those who were appointed and enabled by him thereunto Joh. 1.17 18. Thus was it by him declared in his own person as the Law was by Angels And herein lyes the stress of the Apostles Reasonings with reference unto what he had before discoursed concerning the Son and Angels and his Preheminence above them The great Reason why the Hebrews so pertinaciously adhered unto the Doctrine of the Law was the glorious Publication of it It was the word spoken by Angels they received it by the disposition of Angels If saith the Apostle that were a sufficient cause why the Law should be attended unto and that the neglect of it should be so sorely revenged as it was though in it self but the Ministry of death and condemnation Then consider what is your Duty in reference unto the Gospel which as it was in its self a Word of life and great salvation so it was spoken declared and delivered by the Lord himself whom we have manifested to be so exceedingly exalted above all Angels whatever 3. He farther describes the Gospel from the way and means of its conveyance unto us It was confirmed unto us by them that heard him And herein also he prevents an Objection that might arise in the minds of the Hebrews inasmuch as they at least the greatest part of them were not acquainted with the Personal Ministry of the Lord they heard not the word spoken by him For hereunto the Apostle replyes that though they themselves heard him not yet the same word which he preached was not only declared but confirmed unto them by those that heard him And herein he doth not intend all of them who at any time heard him teaching but those whom in an especial manner he made choice of to employ them in that work namely the Apostles So that this expression those that heard him is a Periphrasis of the Apostles from that great priviledge of hearing immediately all things that our Lord taught in his own
account of the End of it or that which it brings Believers unto The deliverance of the People of Israel of old out of Egypt was great salvation so doth God every where set it forth and so did the people esteem it and that justly They who murmured under it they who despised the pleasant land fell all of them under the sore displeasure of God But yet as this deliverance was but from temporal outward bondage so that which it brought them unto was but outward rest for a few days in a plentiful country it gave them an inheritance of Houses and Lands and Vineyards in the Land of Canaan but yet there also they quickly died and many of them perished in their sins But as we have seen what we are delivered from by this salvation so the Excellency of the Inheritance which we obtain thereby is such as no heart can conceive no tongue can express It brings us into the favour and love of God unto the Adoption of children into durable rest and peace in a word unto the enjoyment of God in glory eternal Oh the Blessedness of this Rest the Glory of this Inheritance the Excellency of this Crown the Eternity and unchangeableness of this Condition the Greatness of this Salvation how mean how weak how low how unworthy are our apprehensions of it yet surely through the blessed Revelation of the Spirit of Grace by the word of the Gospel we see we feel we experience so much of it as is sufficient to keep us up unto an holy Admiration and longing after it all the days of our pilgrimage here on earth It remaineth now that we declare the unavoidableness of their destruction who neglect this so great salvation There are three things that make the punishment or destruction of any person to be unavoidable 1. That it be just and equal 2. That there be no relief nor remedy provided for him And 3. That he to whom it belongs to inflict punishment be able and resolved so to do and they all concur to the height in this case For 1. It is just and equal that such persons should be destroyed whence the sentence concerning them is so decretory and absolute He that believeth not shall be damned Matth. 16.16 And the Holy Ghost supposeth this case so clear evident and undeniable that he refers the proceedings of God therein unto the judgmentof sinners themselves Heb. 10.29 And they who are judged on this account at the last day will be speechless have nothing to reply nothing to complainof And the sentence denounced against them will appearunto all to be righteous 1. Because they despise an overture of a treaty about Peace and Reconciliation between God and their souls There is by nature an enmity between God and them a state and condition whereby themselves alone would be losers and that for ever God who hath no need of them nor their obedience or friendship tenders them a Treaty upon terms of peace What greater condescension love or grace could be conceived or desired This is tendred in the Gospel 2 Cor. 5.19 Now what greater indignity can be offered unto him than to reject his tenders without so much as an enquiry after what his terms are as the most do to whom the Gospel is preached Is not this plainly to tell him that they despise his love scorn his offers of Reconciliation and fear not in the least what he can do unto them And is it not just that such persons should be filled with the fruit of their own ways Let men deal thus with their Rulers whom they have provoked that have power over them and see how it will fare with them Neither will God be mocked nor shall his grace always be despised When men shall see and learn by woful experience what pitiful poor worms they are and have some beams of the Greatness Majesty and Glory of God shining upon them how will they be filled with shame and forced to subscribe to the righteousness of their own Condemnation for refusing his treaty and terms of Peace 2. These terms contain salvation Men in the neglect of them neglect and refuse their own salvation and can any man perish more justly than they who refuse to be saved If God's Terms had been great hard and difficult yet considering by whom they were proposed and to whom there was all the reason in the world why they should be accepted and their destruction would be just thatshould not endeavour to preserve them unto the utmost But now itis life and salvation that he tenders on whose neglect he complains that men will not come unto him that they might have life Certainly there can be no want of righteousness in the ruine of such persons But 3. That which the Apostle principally builds the Righteousness and inevitableness of the destruction of Gospel neglecters upon is the greatness of the salvation tendered unto them How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation How it is so and wherein the greatness and excellency of it doth consist hath been be fore declared Such and so great it is that there is nothing which as inner can fear or suffer but it will deliver him from it nothing that a creature can desire but it will bring him to the possession of it And if this be despised is it not righteous that men should perish If we know not yet God knows how to set a value upon this great Effect of his Love Wisdom and Grace and how to proportion punishment unto its contempt The truth is God alone is able sufficiently to revenge the greatness of this sin and indignity done unto him We have before shewed how meet it was that the transgression of the Law should be punished with punishment eternal and yet the Law had provided no relief for any in distress or misery only taking men as it found them in the first place it required obedience of them and then promised a reward And a good holy and righteous Law it was both in its Commands and in its Promises and Threatnings It found men in a good estate and promised them a better on their obedience wherein if they failed it threatned them with the loss of their present condition and also with the superaddition of eternal ruine And in all this it was a clear effect of the righteousness holiness and faithfulness of God But the Gospel finds men in quite another state and condition in a condition of misery and ruine helpless and hopeless and is provided on purpose both for their present relief and future everlasting happiness And shall they escape by whom it is despised Is it not just and equal that it should prove a savour of death unto death unto them Is it meet that God should be mocked his Grace be despised his Justice violated his Glory lost all that sinners may go unpunished Let them think so whilst they please God thinketh otherwise all the Angels in Heaven think otherwise all the Saints
time a little while So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in that saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 life is short that is of short continuance whether a little in degree or a short time be here intended we shall afterwards enquire 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 prae Angelis more than Angels above the Angels more destitute than the Angels Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Angels of God So all Old Translations render the words And to render it à Deo in the Psalm is needless groundless contradictory to the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gloria honore coronasti eum with glory and honour hast thou crowned him Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Glory and honour hast thou placed on his head 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast crowned him or adorned his head with Glory and Beauty or honour the first word denotes the Weight and worth the latter the Beauty and Splendor of this Crown 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast set him over That is appointed him to be in Authority as Pharaoh set Joseph over the Land of Aegypt Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 authoritatem potestatem ei tribuisti thou hast given him power or Authority made him Sultan or Lord Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 made him Lord or Ruler as Gen. 1.18 so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used Acts 6. Luke 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hast put put down subjected all things under his feet the words all of them emphatically denote subjection and depression and as thus conjoyned the most absolute subjection that can be apprehended Verse 7. Thou madest him lower for a little while than the Angels thou crownedst him with glory and honour and didst set him give him authority over the works of thy hands all things hast thou put in subjection under his feet Verse 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Verse 8. For in that he made all things subject unto him he hath left nothing not put in sabjection but now we see not all things made subject unto him Verse 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The words of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have most of them been considered in the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they must have the same sense in both places or the reasoning of the Apostle would be Equivocal For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some old Copies read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 besides God God excepted The Syriack Copies also vary Some read For God himself by his Grace tasted death Others for he God excepted tasted death which came from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and shews that variety to be antient Hence some have imagined it to be a corruption of the Nestorians who dividing the Person of Christ would not grant that God might be said to dye contrary to Acts 20.28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is gratiâ beneficentiâ beneficio Dei by the grace goodness good will of God expressing the first spring and moving cause of the sufferings of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should taste of death an Hebraism for to dye intimating withall the truth reality and kind of his death which was bitter and which was called his Cup 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Masculine not Neuter Gender for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by an Enallage of number that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of whom he treats all and every one of the children unto whom he was a Captain of Salvation Verse 9. But we see Jesus crowned with glory and honour who for the suffering of death was a little while made lower than the Angels that he by the grace of God might taste of death for all Verse V. THe first words of the fifth Verse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for declare that the Apostle is in the pursuit of his former Argument 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for doth not alwayes intimate the Introduction of a Reason in the confirmation of what is past but sometimes a Progression unto somewhat else in the like kind with that which precedeth and so hath not respect unto any especial words or sayings before going but unto the whole matter in hand especially that which doth ensue as nam also is used in Latin nam quis te juvenum confidentissime nostras jussit adire domos A new Argument therefore to the same purpose with that before is intimated by this particle For. The whole Verse contains an Assertion laid down in a negative Proposition the Assumption of the Apostles Argument or the proof of it supposed in a pro-syllogism consisting in the ensuing Testimony with his Explication of it And it is to this purpose The World to come is not made subject unto Angels but it was made subject to Jesus and therefore he is exalted above them This he proves from the Testimony of the Psalmist to this purpose All things were made subject to man who for a little while was made lower than Angels but this man was Jesus and this Assumption he proves from the Event First On the part of man absolutely considered we see that all things were not made subject unto him therefore he cannot be intended Secondly On the part of Jesus All things in the event agree unto him First He was made for a little while lower than the Angels which he shews the reason of and thence takes occasion to discourse of his Death and Sufferings according to the method before declared and then he was crowned with Glory and Dignity all things being made subject unto him from all which it appears that it is he and not Angels unto whom the world to come is put in subjection This is the series of the Apostles Discourse wherein are many things difficult and hard to be understood which must be particularly considered The first Verse as was said layes down the principal Assertion in a Negative Proposition The world to come is not made subject unto Angels One Proof hereof is included in the words themselves For that Expression he hath not put in subjection is the same with our Apostle as it is no where written or recorded in the Scripture There is no Testimony of it God is no where said to have done it See Chap. 1.5 with the Exposition of it And these Negative Arguments from the Authority of the Old Testament He esteemed in this matter cogent and sufficient In the Proposition it self 1. The Subject of it the World to come with 2. It s limitation whereof we treat and 3. The Praedicate negatively expressed is not put in subjection to Angels are to be considered The Subject of the Proposition is the World to come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The New Heavens and New Earth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which God promised to create Isa. 65.17 Chap. 66.22 which refers unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the dayes of the Messiah The latter Jews sometimes call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the future
Exposition of another part of Christs Mediation as prophesied of in this place For though he was so lessened yet it was not on his own account but that by the grace of God he might taste death for every man Secondly For the other part of the testimony We see saith he upon the evidences mentioned that he is crowned with glory and honour and consequently that all things are put under his feet So that the whole testimony in both parts of it is verified in him and in him alone And hereby he fully evinceth what he had before proposed unto confirmation namely the preheminence of Jesus the Messiah above the Angels or principal Administrators of the Law in this especial instance That the world to come was put into subjection unto him and not unto them and therefore in the state of the Church intended in that expression are his Teachings his Doctrine his Worship diligently to be attended unto by all those who desire to be partakers of the promises and good things thereof Secondly There seems to be a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the words by a transposition of some expressions from their proper place and coherence which must be removed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Some would have those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to belong to the subject of the Proposition whose praedicate alone is crowned with glory and honour whereof the suffering of death is inserted as the meritorious cause So reading the words to this purpose We see that Jesus who was for a little while made lower than the Angels for his suffering of death is crowned with glory and honour Others would have Jesus alone to be the subject of the Proposition of whose praedicate there are two parts or two things are affirmed concerning him First that he was made lower than the Angels the reason whereof is added namely that he might suffer death which is farther explained in the close of the verse by the addition of the Cause and End of that his suffering That by the grace of God he might taste of death for every man so reading the words to this purpose We see Jesus made lower than the Angels for the suffering of death crowned or and crowned with glory and honour The difficulty principally consists in this only namely whether the Apostle by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the suffering of death intend the final cause of the humiliation of Christ he was made low that he might suffer death or the meritorious cause of his Exaltation for or because he suffered death he was crowned with glory and honour And the former seems evidently the intention of the words according to the latter resolution of them and our application of the testimony fore-going For 1. if the cause and means of the Exaltation of Christ had been intended it would have been expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 requiring a Genitive case where the cause or means of any thing is intended but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 expresseth the end of what was before affirmed 2. These words for the suffering of death must express either the minoration and humiliation of Christ or the end of it if they express the end of it then we obtain that which is pleaded for he was made less that he might suffer If they express his minoration it self then the end of it is contained only in the close of the verse that he might taste of death for every man In which exposition of the words the sense would be that he suffered death that by the grace of God he might taste death which is no sense at all 3. If those words denote only the means or meritorious cause of the Exaltation of Christ I enquire what is the medium intended of that end in the close 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he by the grace of God he might taste death The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that so plainly refers unto some preparatory means preceding which in this way can be nothing but the crowning him with glory and honour which we know was not the means but the effect of it He was humbled not exalted that he might taste of death 4. The Apostle doth not meerly take it for granted that Jesus was for a little while made lesser than the Angels but asserts it as proved in the testimony insisted on whereunto he subjoyns the end of that his comparative minoration because he intended it as the especial subject of his ensuing discourse This therefore is the importance and natural order of the words But we see Jesus crowned with glory and honour who was for a little while made lower than the Angels for the suffering of death that he by the grace of God might taste death for every man And the only reason of the transposition of the words consisteth in the Apostles following the order of the things testified unto by the Psalmist first his Humiliation then his Exaltation and yet connecting that which he would next treat of unto that which was first laid down passing by the other as now sufficiently confirmed Thirdly The general design of the words and their order being cleared we shall open them in particular seeing that besides the application of the testimony of the Psalmist unto the Lord Jesus now vindicated there is an assertion in them containing that which of all other things was of most difficult acceptation with the Jews upon the account whereof the Apostle confirms it with many reasons in the verses following to the end of this Chapter And indeed we have here the sum of the Gospel and the Doctrine of it concerning the Person and Office of the Messiah asserted and vindicated from the prejudicate opinions of many of the Jews under these two heads 1. That the salvation and deliverance that God had promised and intended to accomplish by the Messiah was spiritual and eternal from death sin Sathan and hell ending in everlasting glory not temporal and carnal with respect unto the world and the concomitants of it in this life as they vainly imagined 2. That this salvation could be no otherwise wrought nor brought about but by the Incarnation Suffering and death of the Messiah not in especial by Arms War and mighty Power as the People was of old led into Canaan under the conduct of Joshua the Captain of that salvation and as some of them expected yet to be saved and delivered by the Messiah Now the Apostle strengthning his discourse by multiplicity of reasons and arguments he doth not only in these words apply his testimony to what he had before proposed unto confirmation namely the subjection of the world to come unto Christ but also lays in it the springs of those two other Principles which we have mentioned and whose proof and confirmation in the next verses he pursues Sundry things as we have partly seen are contained in the words as first the Exinanition and Humiliation of Christ We see Jesus for a little while made lower and brought into a
more indigent condition than the Angels are or ever were obnoxious unto 2. The general end of that Exinanition and Depression of Jesus it was that he might suffer death 3. His Exaltation unto Power and Authority over all things in particular the world to come crowned with glory and honour 4. A numerous Amplification subjoyned of the end of his depression and the death that it tended unto 1. From the Cause of it the Grace of God 2. The Nature of it he was to taste of death 3. The End of it it was for others And 4. its extent for all That he by the grace of God might taste death for all 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Adversative intimating the introduction of one singular person in opposition to him or them spoken of in the end of the fore-going verse We see not all things put under his feet which some against the whole context apply unto Christ but we see Jesus Had the same person been spoken of in both verses the expression would have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but we see him but a new Antecedent being here introduced but we see Jesus another person is substituted as the subject spoken of as the Syriack version declares we see him that it is Jesus How and in what sense he was made lower than the Angels hath been declared in opening the words as they lie in the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comprized in that testimony of the Psalmist Only it may be enquired whether this Exinanition of Christ or Minoration in respect of Angels did consist meerly in his Incarnation and participation of Humane Nature which in general is esteemed beneath Angelical or in the misery and anxiety which in that nature he conflicted withall And the Apostle seems not absolutely to intend the former 1. Because he speaks of Jesus as the subject of this Minoration now that name denotes the Son of God as Incarnate who is supposed so to be when he is said to be made less than the Angels 2. Because the Humane Nature in the very instant of its union unto the Person of that Son of God was absolutely advanced above the Angelical and might have immediately been possessed of Glory if other works in it had not been to be performed And yet neither doth it intend the low condition wherein he was placed exclusively to his Incarnation though that be afterwards verse 14. particularly spoken unto but his being Incarnate and brought forth and in that condition wherein he was exposed to suffering and so consequently to death it self And thus was he made less than Angels in part in that nature which he assumed he was obnoxious unto all the infirmities which attend it as Hunger Thirst Weariness Pain Sorrow Grief and exposed unto all the miseries from without that any person partaker of that nature is obnoxious unto and in summe death it self from all which miseries Angels are exempted This we see know and grant to have been the state and condition of Jesus But saith he this was but for a little while during his conversation with us on the earth ending at his death The Apostle knew that he had now fixed upon that which of all things the Jews most stumbled at the low and mean despised condition of Jesus they having inveterate prejudicate opinions of another manner of state and condition for the Messiah wherefore he immediately subjoyns the end why he was humbled into this condition which he first explains and then vindicates the necessity of it The end then is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the suffering of death he was so humbled that he might suffer death This yet more displeased the Jews the necessity whereof he therefore immediately proves Adding by the way 3. To complete the application of the testimony produced his Exaltation upon his suffering he was crowned with glory and honour referring us to the testimony it self to declare what was contained in that Exaltation namely an absolute Dominion over all things God only excepted and so consequently over the world to come that was not put in subjection to Angels And in these words the Apostle closeth his argument for the excellency of Christ above the Angels from the subjection of all things unto him and proceeds to the amplification of that kind of the Humiliation of Christ which he had before intimated and that in four things 1. In the impulsive and efficient cause which in the acts of God's will are coincident 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denoting the final cause of what was before asserted relating to the whole clause following That which is here called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the grace of God is else-where explained by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tit. 2.11 the saving grace of God And sometimes it is termed his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chap. 3.4 his Goodness Kindness Benignity and love of mankind absolutely his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 3.16 Rom. 5.8 1 Joh. 3.8 9. Love intense love also his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes. 1.5 his good-pleasure from the riches of his grace verse 1. and his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verse 9. Rom. 8.28 or purpose of his will being the same with his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 8.29 30. his prae-designation and predestination of men unto Grace and Glory From all which it appears what this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or grace of God is that was the moving and impulsive cause of the death of Christ even the gracious free sovereign Purpose of the Will of God suited unto and arising from his natural Grace Love Goodness and Benignity Pity Mercy Compassion exerting themselves therein It was not out of any anger or displeasure of God against Jesus in whom his soul was always well pleased not out of any disregard unto him whom he designed hereby to be crowned with glory and honour but out of his Love Kindness and Goodness towards others who could no otherwise be brought unto Glory as in the next verses the Apostle declares that he thus appointed him to die In the manner of his death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he should taste of death so die as to experience the sorrows bitterness and penalties of death To taste of death is first Really to die not in appearance or pretence in opinion or shew as some foolishly of old blasphemed about the death of Christ which could have had no other fruit but a shadow of Redemption a deliverance in opinion See the phrases used Mark 9.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall not taste of death that is not die And that which is called to see death Joh. 8.51 is called to taste of death v. 52. where the Phrase is applied to the second death or death eternal And it being death which was threatned unto those for whom he dyed and which they should have undergone he really tasted of that death
two branches for it is either Remunerative or Vindictive And this Righteousness of God as the Supreme Ruler and Judge of all is that upon the account whereof it was meet for him or became him to bring the sons to glory by the sufferings of the Captain of their salvation It was hence just equal and therefore indispensibly necessary that so he should do Supposing that man was created in the Image of God capable of yielding Obedience unto him according to the Law concreated with him and written in his heart which Obedience was his moral being for God as he was from or of him supposing that he by sin had broken this Law and so was no longer for God according to the primitive Order and Law of his Creation supposing also notwithstanding all this that God in his infinite Grace and Love intended to bring some men unto the enjoyment of himself by a new way Law and appointment by which they should be brought to be for him again Supposing I say these things which are all here supposed by our Apostle and were granted by the Jews it became the Justice of God that is it was so just right meet and equal that the Judge of all the world who doth right could no otherwise do than cause him who was to be the Way Cause Means and Author of this Recovery of men into a new condition of being for God to suffer in their steed For whereas the Vindictive Justice of God which is the respect of the Universal Rectitude of his Holy Nature unto the deviation of his rational creatures from the Law of their Creation required that that deviation should be revenged and themselves brought into a new way of being for God or of glorifying him by their sufferings when they had refused to do so by Obedience it was necessary on the account thereof that if they were to be delivered from that condition that the Author of their deliverance should suffer for them And this excellently suits the design of the Apostle which is to prove the necessity of the suffering of the Messiah which the Jews so stumbled at For if the Justice of God required that so it should be how could it be dispensed withall Would they have God unjust Shall he fore-go the glory of his Righteousnâ—ss and Holiness to please them in their presumption and prejudices It is true indeed if God had intended no salvation of his sons but one that was temporal like that granted unto the people of old under the conduct of Joshua there had been no need at all of the sufferings of the Captain of their salvation But they being such as in themselves had sinned and come short of the glory of God and the salvation intended them being spiritual consisting in a new ordering of them for God and the bringing of them unto the eternal enjoyment of him in Glory there was no way to maintain the Honour of the Justice of God but by his sufferings And as here lay the great mistake of the Jews so the denial of this condecency of Gods Justice as to the sufferings of the Messiah is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Socinians Schlictingius on this place would have no more intended but that the way of bringing Christ to suffer was answerable unto that design which God had laid to glorifie himself in the salvation of man But the Apostle says not that it became or was suitable unto an arbitrary free decree of God but it became himself as the Supreme Ruler and Judge of all he speaks not of what was meet unto the execution of a free Decree but what was meet on the account of Gods Holiness and Righteousness to the constitution of it as the description of him annexed doth plainly shew And herein have we with our Apostle discovered the great indispensible and fundamental cause of the sufferings of Christ. And we may hence observe that V. Such is the desert of sin and such is the immutability of the Justice of God that there was no way possible to bring sinners unto glory but by the death and sufferings of the Son of God who undertook to be the Captain of their salvation It would have been unbecoming God the Supreme Governour of all the world to have passed by the desert of sin without this satisfaction And this being a truth of great importance and the foundation of most of the Apostles ensuing discourses must be a while insisted on In these Verses that fore-going this and some of those following the Apostle directly treats of the Causes of the sufferings and death of Christ. A matter as of great importance in it self comprizing no small part of the mystery of the Gospel so indispensibly necessary to be explained and confirmed unto the Hebrews who had entertained many prejudices against it In the fore-going Verse he declared the cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the inducing leading moving cause which was the Grace of God by the grace of God he was to taste death for men This grace he farther explains in this Verse shewing that it consisted in the Design of God to bring many sons to glory All had sinned and come short of his glory He had according to the exigence of his Justice denounced and declared Death and Judgment to be brought upon all that sinned without exception Yet such was his infinite Love and Grace that he determined or purposed in himself to deliver some of them to make them sons and to bring them unto glory Unto this end he resolved to send or give his Son to be a Captain of salvation unto them And this Love or Grace of God is every where set forth in the Gospel How the sufferings of this Captain of salvation became useful unto the sons upon the account of the manifold union that was between them he declares in the following Verses farther explaining the Reasons and Causes why the benefit of his sufferings should redound unto them In this Verse he expresseth the cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the procuring cause of the death and sufferings of Christ which is the Justice of God upon supposition of sin and his purpose to save sinners And this upon examination we shall find to be the great cause of the death of Christ. That the Son of God who did no sin in whom his soul was always well pleased on the account of his obedience should suffer and die and that a death under the sentence and curse of the Law is a great and astonishable mystery all the Saints of God admire at it the Angels desire to look into it What should be the cause and reason hereof why God should thus bruise him and put him to grief This is worth our enquiry and various are the conceptions of men about it The Socinians deny that his sufferings were poenal or that he died to make satisfaction for sin but only that he did so to confirm the Doctrine that he had taught and to set us an
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 17. every way like Here it is restrained by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same that is flesh and blood Humane Nature as to the Humane Nature he was every way as the children 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Partem habuit particeps erat he took part And in the use of this Word the Dative Case of the Person is still understood and sometimes expressed So Plato 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he might share or partake in the same acts with them And it is here also understood That he might partake with them of flesh and blood And the Apostle purposely changeth the word from that which he had before used concerning the children 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they had Humane Nature in common they were men and that was all having no Existence but in and by that nature Concerning him he had before proved that he had a Divine Nature on the account whereof he was more excellent than the Angels And here he sayes of him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Existing in his Divine Nature he moreover took part of that nature with them which makes a difference between their Persons though as to Humane Nature they were every way alike and this removes the exception of Schlictingius or Crellius that he is no more said to be incarnate than the children That by death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This word is peculiar to Paul He useth it almost in all his Epistles and that frequently Elsewhere it occurs but once in the New Testament Luke 13.17 and that in a sense whereunto by him it is not applyed That which he usually intends in this word is to make a thing or person to cease as to its present condition and not to be what it was So Rom. 3.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall their unbelief make the faith of God of none effect cause it to cease render the promise useless And v. 31. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 do we make the Law void by faith take away its use and End Chap. 4.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the promise is made ineffectual Chap. 7.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If her husband is dead she is freed from the Law The Law of the Husband hath no more power over her So v. 6. 1 Cor. 13.8 10 11. Chap. 15.24 26. 2 Cor. 3.10 13. Gal. 3.17 Chap. 5.4 11. Ephes. 2.15 The Intention of the Apostle in this word is the making of any thing to cease or to be void as to its former Power and Efficacy not to remove annihilate or destroy the Essence or Being of it And the Expression here used is to the same purpose with that in Psalm 8.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to quiet or make to cease the enemy and self-avenger 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is properly vis robur potentia Force Strength Power like that of Arms or Armies in battle And sometimes it is used for Rule Empire and Authority 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to be in Place of Power and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to be able to dispose of what it relates unto And in both senses we shall see that the Devil is said to have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the power of death Now there is not any notion under which the Devil is more known unto or spoken of among the Jews than this of his having the power of death his common appellation among them is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Angel of death And they call him Samael also So the Targum of Jonathan 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 3.6 And the woman saw Samael the Angel of death And Maimon More Nebu. lib. 2. cap. 30. tells us from the Midrash that Samael rode upon the Serpent when he deceived Eve that is used him as his instrument in that work And most of them acknowledge Sathan to be principally intended in the temptation of Eve though Aben Ezra deny it in his Comment on the words and dispute against it And he addes that by Samael the Angel of death they understand Sathan which he proves from the words of their wise men who say in some places that Sathan would have hindred Abraham from sacrificing of Isaac and in others that Samael would have done it which proves that it is one and the same who by both names is intended And hence they usually call him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the wicked Samael the Prince of all the devils and say of him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Samael brought death upon all the world So that by this Samael or Angel of death it is evident that they intend him who is termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Prince and Ruler of the rest So also they speak expresly in Baba Bathra distinc Hashatephir 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rabbi Simeon said the same is Sathan and the Angel of death and the evil figment that is the cause and author of it And they call him the Angel of death on many accounts the consideration whereof may give us some light into the reason of the Expression here used by the Apostle The first is that before mentioned namely that by his means death entred and came upon all the world His temptation was the first occasion of death and for that reason is he termed by our Saviour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 8.44 a murtherer from the beginning And herein he had the power of death prevailing to render all mankind obnoxious to the sentence and stroke of it Secondly Because he is employed in great and signal Judgments to inflict death on men He is the head of those 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 evil Angels who slew the Aegyptians Psal. 78 49. So in Psal. 91.5 those words Thou shalt not fear 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the arrow that flieth by day are rendred by the Targum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the arrow of the Angel of death which he shooteth by day And in the next verse those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the destruction that wasteth at noon day they render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the troop of devils that walk at noon-day the Psalmist treating of great and sudden destructions which they affirm to be all wrought by Sathan and thence the Hellenists also render the latter place by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the devil at noon-day wherein they are followed by the Vulgar Latine Arabick and Aethiopick Translations And this the Apostle seems to allude unto 1 Cor. 10.10 where he says that those who murmured in the wilderness were destroyed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the destroyer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the destroying Angel or the Angel of death as in this Epistle he terms him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chap. 11.28 And it may be this is he who is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Job 18.13 the first-born of death or he that hath right unto the administration of it They term him also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
the waster or destroyer and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to waste or destroy as also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which as John tells us is the Hebrew name of the Angel of the bottomless pit Revel 9.11 as his Greek name is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thirdly The latter Jews suppose that this Angel of death takes away the life of every man even of those who die a natural death And hereby as they express the old faith of the Church that death is poenal and that it came upon all for sin through the temptation of Sathan so also they discover the bondage that they themselves are in for fear of death all their days For when a man is ready to die they say the Angel of death appears to him in a terrible manner with a sword drawn in his hand From thence drops I know not what poison into him whereon he dies Hence they wofully houl lament and rend their garments upon the death of their friends And they have composed a prayer for themselves against this terrour Because also of this their being slain by the Angel of death they hope and pray that their death may be an expiation for all their sins Here lies the sting of death mentioned by the Apostle 1. Cor. 15.55 Hence they have a long story in their Midrash or mystical Exposition of the Pentateuch on the last section of Deuteronomy about Samaels coming to take away the life of Moses whom he repelled and drove away with the Rod that had the Shem Hamphorash written in it And the like story they have in a book about the acts of Moses which Aben-Ezra rejects on Exod. 4.20 This hand of Sathan in death manifesting it to be poenal is that which keeps them in bondage and fear all their days Fourthly they suppose that this Angel of death hath power over men even after death One horrible penalty they fancy in particular that he inflicts on them which is set down by Elias in his Tishbi in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 out of the Midrash of Rabbi Isaac the son of Parnaer for when a man as they say departs out of this world 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Angel of death comes and sits upon his grave And he brings with him a Chain partly of iron partly of fire and making the soul to return into body he breaks the bones and torments variously both body and soul for a season This is their Purgatory and the best of their hopes are that their punishment after this life shall not be eternal And this various interest of Sathan in the power of death both keeps them in dismal bondage all their days and puts them upon the invention of several ways for their deliverance Thus one of their solemn Prayers on the day of Expiation is to be delivered from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or this punishment of the devil in their graves to which purpose also they offer a Cock unto him for his pacification And their prayer to this purpose in their Berachoth is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That it may please thee good Lord to deliver us from evil Decrees or Laws from poverty from contempt from all kind of punishments from the judgment of hell and from beating in the grave by the Angel of death And this supposition is in like manner admitted by the Mahumetans who have also this prayer Deus noster libera nos ab Angelo interrogante tormento sepulchri à via mala And many such lewd imaginations are they now given up unto proceeding from their ignorance of the Righteousness of God But yet from these apprehensions of theirs we may see what the Apostle intended in this expression calling the devil him that had the power of death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et liberaret ipsos hos quotquot quicunque and free those who 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to dismiss discharge free and in the use of the word unto the Accusative case of the Person the Genitive of the thing is added or understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I free thee from this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aristoph to deliver thee from this eye-sore And sometimes the Genitive case of the thing is expressed where the Accusative of the person is omitted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to free or deliver one from fear as here the Accusative case of the person is expressed and the Genitive of the thing omitted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to deliver them that is from death or from fear because of death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is obnoxius obstrictus reus damnas He that is legally obnoxious subject liable to any thing that is Law Crime Judge Judgment Punishment in all which respects the word is used He that is under the power of any Law is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subject unto its authority and penalty See Matth. 5.21 22. chap. 26.66 Mark 3.29 1 Cor. 11.27 James 2.10 Now the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 servitude or bondage here mentioned is poenal and therefore are men said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 obnoxious unto it Verse 14 15. For as much then as or seeing therefore that the children are were in common partakers of flesh and blood he also himself likewise after the same manner took part did partake of the same that through by death he might destroy make void the authority of him that had the power of death that is the devil And deliver free discharge them who through fear of death were all their life time subject to bondage In former Verses as was shewed the Apostle declared the necessity that there was on the part of God intending to bring many sons unto glory to constitute such an union between them and the Captain of their salvation as that it might be just for him to suffer in their stead In these he proceeds to manifest in particular what that Nature is in the common participation whereof their union designed did consist wherein they were all of one and what were the especial reasons why the Lord Christ was made partaker of that nature This coherence of these Verses Chrysostom briefly gives us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Having shewed the brotherhood that was between Christ and the children he lays down the causes of that dispensation and what they are we shall find here expressed There are sundry things which the Apostle supposeth in these words as known unto and granted by the Hebrews As first that the Devil had the power of death Secondly That on this account men were filled with fear of it and led a life full of anxiety and trouble by reason of that fear Thirdly That a deliverance from this condition was to be effected by the Messiah Fourthly That the way whereby he was to do this was by his suffering All
able there is a chain of God in it not to be broken men may gall themselves with it but cannot remove it and if God take it from them without granting them a lawful release and delivery it is to their farther misery And this is in some measure or other the portion of every one that is convinced of sin before they are freed by the Gospel And some have disputed what degrees of it are necessary before believing But what is necessary for any one to attain unto is his duty But this bondage can be the duty of no man because it is involuntary It will follow conviction of sin but it is no mans duty rather it is such an effect of the Law as every one is to free himself from so soon as he may in a right way and manner This estate then befalls men whether they will or no. And this is so if we take bondage passively as it affects the soul of the sinner which the Apostle seems to intend by placing it as an effect of the fear of death take it actively and it is no more than the sentence of the Law which works and causeth it in the soul and so all sinners are inevitably obnoxious unto it And this estate as we observed fills men with desires after and puts them upon various attempts for deliverance Some desire only present ease and they commonly with-draw themselves from it by giving up themselves wholly unto their hearts lusts and therein to Atheism which God oftentimes in his righteous judgment gives them up unto knowing that the day is coming wherein their present woful temporal relief will be recompenced with eternal misery Some look forwards unto what is to come and accordingly to their light and assistance variously apply themselves to seek relief Some do it by a righteousness of their own and in the pursuit thereof also there are ways innumerable not now to be insisted on and some do it by Christ which how it is by him effected the Apostle in the next place declares Two things as was shewed are affirmed of the Lord Christ in consequence unto the premised supposition of the childrens being partakers of flesh and bloud and of their obnoxiousness unto death and to bondage 1. That of their natural condition he himself partook 2. That from their moral condition he delivered them which that he might do it was necessary that he should partake of the other 1. He himself did likewise partake of the same The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 likewise in like manner doth denote such a similitude as is consistent with a specifical identity And therefore Chrysostom from hence urgeth the Marcionites and Valentinians who denyed the reality of the Humane Nature of Christ seeing that he partook of it in like manner with us that is truly and really even as we do But yet the word by force of its composition doth intimate some disparity and difference He took part of humane nature really as we do and almost in like manner with us For there were two differences between his being partaker of humane nature and ours First In that we subsist singly in that nature but he took his portion in this nature into subsistence with himself in the Person of the Son of God Secondly This nature in us is attended with many infirmities that follow the individual persons that are partakers of it in him it was free from them all And this the Apostle also intimates in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 changing his expression from that whereby he declared the common interest of the children in the same nature which is every way equal and alike The whole is That he took his own Portion in his own Manner unto himself And this Observation removes what is hence objected against the Deity of Christ. Cum Christus saith Schlictingius hominum mortalium fragilium dux fautor sit propterea is non Angelus aliquis multo verò minus ipse Deus summus qui solus immortalitatem habet sed homo suo tempore malis variis calamitatibus obnoxius esse debuit It is true it appears from hence that Christ ought to be a man subject to sufferings and death and not an Angel as the Apostle farther declares in the next verse but that he ought not to be God it doth not appear As God indeed he could not die but if he who was God had not taken part of flesh and bloud God could not have redeemed his Church with his own blood But this is the perpetual Paralogism of these men Because Christ is asserted to have been truly a man therefore he is not God which is to deny the Gospel and the whole mystery of it He proceeds with his exceptions against the application of these words unto the incarnation of the Lord Christ the sum whereof is that the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denote an universal conformity or specifick identity between Christ and the children not only as to the Essence but also as to all other concernments of humane nature or else no benefit could redound unto them from what he did or suffered But 1. The words do not assert any such thing as hath been declared 2. It is not true The children were partakers of humane nature either by Creation out of the dust of the earth as Adam or by natural generation The Lord Christ was conceived of a Virgin by the power of the Holy Ghost and yet the benefit redounds unto the children It is evident then that the similitude urged by the Apostle is confined to the substance of flesh and bloud or the Essence of Humane Nature and is not to be extended unto the personal concernments of the one or the other nor the way whereby they became partakers of the same nature Nor is the argument for the Incarnation of Christ taken meerly from the expressions in this verse but whereas he had before proved him to be above and before the Angels even God over all and here intimating his existence antecedent to his participation of flesh and blood his Incarnation doth necessarily ensue The necessity of this Incarnation of Christ with respect unto the End of it hath before been declared evinced and confirmed We shall now stay only a little to admire the Love Grace and Mysterie of it And we see here IV. That the Lord Christ out of his inexpressible Love willingly submitted himself unto every condition of the Children to be saved by him and to every thing in every condition of them sin only excepted They being of flesh and blood which must be attended with many infirmities and exposed unto all sorts of Temptations and miseries he himself would also partake of the same His delight was of Old in the Sons of men Prov. 8.30 and his heart was full of thoughts of Love towards them and that alone put him on this Resolution Gal. 2.20 Rev. 1.5 When God refused Sacrifices and Burnt-Offerings as insufficient to make the
omnes inimicos suos quorum caput est diabolus coercet eorum vires frangit eosque tandem penitus abolebit But if this be so and the abolishing of the power of Satan be an act of Soveraign Power then it was not done by the death of Christ nor was there any need that he should partake of flesh and blood for that purpose or dye So that this Exposition contradicts both the express words of the Apostle and also the whole design of his discourse No proposition can be more plain than this is that the Power of Satan was destroyed by the death of Christ which in this Interpretation of the words is denyed 5. And hence it lastly appears what was the Delivery that was procured for the children by this dissolution of the Power of Satan It respects both what they feared and what ensued on their fear that is Death and Bondage For the delivery here intended is not meerly a Consequent of the destruction of Satan but hath regard unto the things themselves about which the power of Satan was exercised They were obnoxious unto death on the Guilt of sin as poenal as under the Curse as attended with Hell or everlasting misery This he delivered the children from by making an Attonement for their sins in his death virtually loosing their Obligation thereunto and procuring for them Eternal Redemption as shall afterwards be fully declared Hereon also they are delivered from the Bondage before described The fear of death being taken away the bondage that ensues thereon vanisheth also And these things as they are done virtually and legally in the death of Christ so they are actually accomplished in and towards the children upon the Application of the death of Christ unto them when they do believe And we may now close our consideration of these Verses with one or two other Observations as X. The death of Christ through the wise and righteous disposal of God is victorious all conquering and prevalent The aim of the world was to bring him unto death and therein they thought they had done with him The aim of Satan was so also who thereby supposed he should have secured his own Kingdom And what could worldly or Satanical Wisdom have imagined otherwise He that is slain is conquered His own followers were ready to think so We trusted say they that it had been he who should have redeemed Israel Luke 24.21 But he is dead and their hopes are with him in the grave What can be expected from him who is taken slain crucified Can he save others who it seems could not save himself Per mortem alterius stultum est sperare salutem Is it not a foolish thing to look for life by the death of another This was that which the Pagans of old reproached the Christians withal that they believed in one that was crucified and dyed himself and what could they expect from him And our Apostle tells us that this death this Cross was a stumbling block unto the Jews and folly to the Greeks 1 Cor. 1.18 23. And so would it have been in its self Acts 2.13 Chap. 4.28 had not the Will and Counsel and Wisdom and Grace of God been in it But he ordered things so that this death of Christ should pull out that pin which kept together the whold fabrick of sin and Satan that like Sampson he should in his death pull down the pallace of Satan about his ears and that in dying he should conquer and subdue all things unto himself All the Angels of Heaven stood looking on to see what would be the end of this great trial Men and Devils were ignorant of the great work which God had in hand And whilest they thought they were destroying him God was in and by him destroying them and their power Whilest his heel was bruised he brake their head And this should teach us to leave all Gods works unto himself See John 11.6 7 8 9 10. He can bring light out of darkness and meat out of the Eater He can disappoint his Adversaries of their greatest hopes and fairest possibilities and raise up the hopes of his own out of the grave He can make suffering to be saving death victorious and heal us by the stripes of his Son And in particular it should stir us up to meditate on this mysterious work of his Love and Wisdom We can never enough search into it whilest our Enquiry is guided by his Word New Mysteries all fountains of Refreshment and Joy will continually open themselves unto us untill we come be to satisfied with the endless fulness of it unto Eternity Again XI One principal end of the death of Christ was to destroy the power of Satan To destroy him that had the power of death This was promised of old Gen. 3.15 He was to break the head of the Serpent From him sprang all the miseries which he came to deliver his Elect from and which could not be affected without the dissolution of his Power He was anointed to proclaim liberty to the Captives and the opening the Prison to them that were bound Isa. 61.1 To this End he was to conquer him who detained them which he did by his death Col. 2.15 and so lead Captivity Captive Psalm 68.18 stilling this enemy and self-avenger Psal. 8.3 binding the strong man Mat. 12. and dividing the spoil with him Isa. 53.12 And this he did by the merit of his blood and the Attonement he made for sin thereby This took away the Obligation of the Law unto death and disarmed Satan And moreover by the Power of the Eternal Spirit whereby he offered himself unto God he conquered and quelled him Satan laid his claim unto the Person of Christ but coming to put it in Execution he met with that great and hidden Power in him which he knew not and was utterly conquered And this as it gives us a particular consideration of the Excellency of our Redemption wherein Satan our old Enemy who first foyled us who alwayes hates us and seeks our ruine is conquered spoiled and chained so it teacheth us how to contend with him by what Weapons to resist his Temptations and to repell his Affrightments even those whereby he hath been already subdued Faith in the death of Christ is the only Way and Means of obtaining a Conquest over him He will fly at the Sign of the Cross rightly made Verse XVI HAving asserted the Incarnation of the Lord Christ the Captain of our salvation and shewed the necessity of it from the Ends which were to be accomplished by it and therein given the Reason of his concession that he was for a season made less than the Angels The Apostle proceeds in this Verse to confirm what he had taught before by Testimony of the Scripture and adds an especial Amplification of the Grace of God in this whole Dispensation from the consideration of the Angels who were not made partakers of the like Love and Mercy Verse 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
doth not directly or properly signifie to help or to relieve but signifying to take hold of is transferred unto that use and sense I ask where by whom in what Author If he says in this place by the Apostle that will not prove it and where any will plead for the metaphorical use of a word they must either prove that the sense of the place where it is used inforces that acceptation of it or at least that in like cases in other places it is so used neither of which are here pretended But he proceeds Quod hic dicit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 18. per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 effert de eadem enim re uâ—robique agitur rationem consequentiae argumenti quod in hoc versiculo proponit illio explicat This is but imagined the contrary is evident unto every one upon the first view of the Context Here the Apostle discourseth the Reason of the Humiliation of Christ and his taking flesh there the benefit of his Priestly Office unto them that do believe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is therefore properly assumo accipio to take unto or to take upon And the Apostle teacheth us by it that the Lord Christ took unto him and took on him our Humane Nature of the seed of Abraham That the Genuine sense of the place may be yet more fully vindicated I shall farther consider the exceptions of a very learned man unto our Interpretation of the words and his Answers unto the Reasons whereby it is confirmed First he says that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being in the present tense signifieth a continued action such as Christs helping of us is but his assumption of humane nature was a momentaneous action which being past long before the Apostle would not express it as a thing present It is generally answered unto this exception that an enallage is to be allowed and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is usual in the Scripture So Joh. 1.31 chap. 21.13 But yet there is no just necessity of supposing it in this place The Apostle in his usual manner disputing with the Hebrews on the principles wherein they had been instructed from the Old Testament minds them that there is nothing said therein of his taking upon him the nature of Angels but only of the seed of Abraham So that he takes is he doth so in the Scripture that affirms him so to do and in respect hereunto the expression in the present tense is proper to his purpose This way of arguing and manner of expression we have manifested on chap. 1.5 Again he addes this expression He took not on him Angels for the nature of Angels is hard and uncouth as it would be in the affirmative to say assumpsit homines or hominem he took men or a man which we say not although we do that he took humane nature But the reason of this phrase of speech is evident Having before affirmed that he was partaker 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of flesh and blood whereby the nature of man is expressed repeating here again the same assertion with respect unto the Promise and a negation of the same thing in reference unto Angels because their nature consisteth not of flesh and blood he expresseth it indefinitely and in the concrete he took not them that is not that in and of them which answers unto flesh and blood in the children that is their nature So that there is no need to assert as he supposeth some may do that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ought to be repeated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and referred unto those bodies which the Angels assumed for a season in their Apparitions under the Old Testament there being only an Elipsis easie to be supplied of that in them which answers unto flesh and blood in the children Thirdly The Apostle he saith sheweth verse 17. that Christ ought in all things to be made like unto us by this reason Quod non assumpsit Angelos sed semen Abrabae But if this be to take on him the nature of man he comes to prove the same thing by the same For to be made like unto us and to assume humane nature differ only in words and not really or indeed But take 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to help or relieve and all things agree For because he came to help us and not Angels it became him to be made like unto us But herein lies a double mistake First in the scope and argument of the Apostle for those words in the beginning of the 17 verse are not an Inference or Conclusion from what is asserted in this verse but an Affirmation of the necessity of what is there asserted from that which follows in the same verse that he might be a faithful High Priest Secondly those words like unto us do not intend his conformity unto us in his participation of humane nature which he had on other reasons before confirmed but in the sufferings and temptations which there he insists upon Fourthly The seed of Abraham he says is a collective expression and denotes many at least it must denote the person of some man which Christ did not assume And therefore it is the spiritual seed of Abraham that is intended that is believers And the Apostle so calls them because the Hebrews were well pleased with the mention of that priviledge But this will not abide the examination The great promise of old unto Abraham was that in his seed all the nations of the earth should be blessed The intendment of that Promise was that the Messiah should be his seed of his posterity That by this seed one individual was intended our Apostle declares Gal. 3.16 As Christ in like manner is said to be of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. 1.3 Of this Promise the Apostle minds the Hebrews So that his taking on him the seed of Abraham is not the assuming of many nor of the person of any one of them but meerly his being made of the seed of Abraham according to the Promise And to bend these words unto any other sense than the accomplishment of the Promise made to Abraham that Christ should be of his seed is plainly to pervert them And this is all of weight that I can meet withall which is objected unto our interpretation of this place which being removed it is further established Lastly in the disparate removed by Angels the good Angels not fallen Angels are principally regarded Of fallen Angels he had newly spoken under the collective expression the devil who had the power of death Norare it may be the devils any where called absolutely by the name of Angels but they are termed either evil Angels or Angels that sinned that left their habitation that are to be judged the devils Angels or have some or other peculiar Adjunct whereby they are marked out and distinguished Now it cannot be that this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if it be interpreted