a man and his wife be bound by Obligation a Writ against them both vpon that Obligation shall abate car fait del Feme couert est void See 15 Ed. 4 fol. 10. that if an Obligation bee made to Baron and Feme and the husband dieth the wife or husbands Executor which of them shall hap to haue the Obligation shall sue c. as it is said by Bryan And Detinue of Charters shall bee brought by Baron and Feme for Charters concerning her ioynt possession 38. H. 6. fol. 25. If Baron and Feme make a Lease for yeares of the wiues lands they must ioyne in an action of waste or else the Writ shall abate 7. H. 4. 15. yet 3. H. 6. fol. 53. a Writ of waste so brought was doubted of because forsooth a Feme couert cannot make any Lease But at the last the Writ was holden good for the wife might accept the rent or distraine for it and make auowrie after the husbands death at what time and not before shee hath power to agree or disagree but during the Couerture the lease was the Act of them both baron feme tenants for yeares may ioyne in an Action of couenant against the Lessor that outeth them for the wife suruiuing shall haue the terme if the husband doe not aliene 47. of Ed. 3. fol. 12. And where a remainder is to bee executed to a Feme couert by force and conueyance of a fine c. the Baron and Feme may haue a Scire facias to shew why the land should not remaine to I. S. and to N. his wife for the land cannot remaine to one of them but it must remaine to them both But a Formidon in Discender or Reuerter or a Writ of Escheat differeth 11. H. 4. fol. 15. 44. Ed. â— fol. 10. a Writ of Dower was brought by Baron and feme and the tenant pleaded that the former baron had neuer any thing in the land during the espousals which the Demandants did not deny therefore the Tenant prayed they might be barred and their confession recorded but it would not be granted because it should bee preiudiciall to the wife yet at the request of the Tenant they were receiued to acknowledge their right by fine and the woman was examined Quod nota for she shall not be examined vpon confession of an Action SECT XLVI Actions against Baron and Feme AS Actions are rightly puâ—sued by Baron and Feme when right is withholden from her or wrong done to her selfe her interest or possession so when the wife is or is supposed a wrong doer or her husband doth wrong vnder pretext of her interest writs must be sued against them both for as it hath béene shewed already if a Feme couert bee condemned in any ciuill Action without her husband she and her husband may haue a Writ of error Therefore if a woman which is indebted take a husband an Action of Debt shall be against her and her husband in the Debent 9. E. 4. fol. 24. 7. H. 7. fol. 2. agréeth and if any thing were owing to the Feme before marriage the Writ of such a debt shall bee Quasâ—is debet If a man baile goods to a Feme sole which marrieth afterward an Action of Detinue shall be against her and her husband for these goods per curiam 39. Ed. 3. 17. And 1. H. 4. fol. 31. a Writ of trespasse sur le case was brought for not repairing certaine bankes vpon lands which the defendant had in Dale by reason wherof the plaintiffes ground was surrounded and because the Defendants whole interest in Dale was only jure vxoris which wife was not named in the Writ it abated for they ought to haue béen ioyned 3. H. 4. fol. 1. Upon a Lease made to Baron and Feme for yeares rendring rent the Lessor brings a Writ of Debt c. against Baron and Feme and Iudgement was asked of the Writ because it was not brought against the Baron onely Thiâ—â—ing holdeth the Writ good aswell as an Action of waste shall bee against both Baron Feme vpon such a Leafe and so doth one other Iustice but some pleaders argued contra And in Actions against Baron and Feme the woman must be named wife 42. Edw. 3. fol. 23. A writ of trespasse is brought against Iohn and Alice with others Alice saith shee was and is the wife of Iohn iour del briefe purchase iudgement del briefe and this is a good plea in abatement of the writ So if a writ be against Iohn and Alice his wife Alice if shée be single may plead not the wife Iudgement del briefe But Iohn shall not haue that plea per totam curiam for none as Brooke maketh the reason shall plead Misnosmer but the partie 7. H. 6. fol. 9. In Assise against Baron and Feme the Uicount returned that hee had attached the Baron per centum ones matrices but the wife had nothing to be attached of within his Bâ—â—liwicke heâ— eâ—â— in eádem inuenta the best opinion is that the returne is not good for he was commanded to attach the wife which the Law would neuer command if the thing were impossible but it is possible enough for the wife to be attached by her husbands goods and by him shee must bee brought into the Court. Babington saith an Attachment must bee by a meere chattle which shall be forfeited by Default but not by any Chattell reall as a Lease for yeares or a ward or by appartell c. Now note it hath béene said that in an Action of debt or trespasse or other personall Actions if the Baron appeare and the wife make default or if the wife appeare and the baron make default they shall not answer the one without the other 44. Ed. 3. fol. 1. A writ of debt was brought against Baron and Feme the wife outlawed the Baron rendred himselfe at the Exigent at returne whereof hee appeared in ward and the Plaintiffe prayed because the Processe was determined against the wife that the husband might answer sed non alocatur But sée in the next lease a writ of trespasse pursued against Baron and Feme to the Exigent the Uicount returned that hee had taken them at the day the Baron came inward without the wife c. The Plaintiffe declared against him he was compelled to answer and pleaded not culpable le Vicont fuit charge de le corps le Feme amercâ—e and a writ went out to haue the wife at Westminster at a certaine day with a Venire facias betwixt the Plaintiffe and the husband returnable the same day sée 34. H. 6. fol. 29. A writ of trespasse against Baron and Feme and the Baron as seruant to the Chancellor brought a Superâ—edeas for himselfe and his wife Littleton said it was to be allowed for neither of them no more than where trespasse is brought against one of the Chancery and another man c. Nay not so much saith Prisot for in that case the
giue away in fée or for life the tenement which shée holdeth in Dower the heire or he which is in reuersion may maintenant haue his recouerie by Writ of Entrie and this is termed a writ of Entrie in Casu prouiso There is no doubt but Fée in this Statute signifieth both Fée simple and Fée taile And he which hath Fée simple Fée taile or Estate for life in the reuersion may haue this Writ against the Alienée or against him which is tenant of the Francktenement And this during the life of the tenant in Dower which aliened for when she is dead it lieth not perâ—el Nâ—t Breu. The Statute expresseth not the writ but the forme is Praecipe A. quod reddat B. vnum tonemen um quod clamat in quod non habet ingressum nisi per C. quae suit vxo D. qui illud ei demisâ—â— illud tenuit in dotem de dono praedicti D. quondum viri sunt cuius haeres c. quod post eemisionem per istud C. praefat ' A. contra formam Statuti Glocest c. ad praefatum â— reuerti debet performameiusdem Statuti And it may be in the Per Cui or Post If a woman recouer Dower against the heire and then alien in Fée the recouerie must be mentioned by the heire in his writ of Entrie in Casu prouiso In like manner as it must be in a writ of Entrieâ—d Communem Legem vpon an alienation by tenant in Dower and though this alienation be but in taile or for life yet the forme of the writ varieth not If he which hath the reuersion in Fée grant it to another and the Tenant in Dower after Atturnment alieneth in Fee the Grantée of the reuersion shall haue Writ specifying the grant Likewise if the heire grant his reuersion with Atturnment and the Grantée grants it ouer with Atturnment the third Grantée may haue a writ specifying that the woman held of the first second and third ex assignatione c. The Aunt and Néece hauing the reuersion by discent may ioyne in this writ and the processe is summons grand and petit cape SECT XXX The Writ if Enirie in Casa coasimili THis Writ is in nature like the other and it lyeth when Tenant by the courtesie or Tenant for his owne life or another mans alieneth in fée or in taile or for terme of life he in the reuersion which hath it for life or in taile or in fée may haue this Writ of Entrie in Casu consimili during the life of him which aliened and this is formed and granted vpon West 2. cap. 24. which willeth That as often as there is a Writ found in Chancerie for one case and another case falling sub eodemâ—â—â—e and requiring like remedy there is none in the registrie of the Chancerie for that the Clerks of the Chancerie shall concord in framing a writ Vel atterminent quaerâ—ntes in proximo Parliamento scribantur vsus in quibus concordare non possunt c. referant eos ad proximum Parliamentum fiat breue de consensu Iurisperitorâ—m ne contingâ—tdâ— caetero quod curia Domini Regis deficiat conquerentibus in Iustitia perquirenda The Writ is Reuerti debet performam statuti in consimili casu prouisi And it supposeth alwayes altenation in feodo although the Tenant leased or dem sed it but for terme of another mans life or in taile And so the writ of in Casu prouiso And that of Entrie ad Communem Legem This writ may be in the per cui and post And without title made in the writ if if so be that the Demandant himselfe made the particular estate of him which aliened But if the father or other Ancestor make a lease for terme of life and die and then the Tenant for life alieneth in fée now the heire in reuersion shall haue a writ comprising his title in it selfe And if this writ be brought vpon alienation made by Baron and Feme the writ supposeth that the wife aliened with her husband but yet shée may haue a Cui in vita after her husbands death the alienation not letting it If Tenant for life grant his estate to another and the grantee alieneth in fée the Writ shall be in quod non habet ingressum nisi per C. cuâ— D. qui illud tenuit ad vitam ex demissione B. deâ—â—sit ad eusdem teâ—mâ—num c. If a man make a lease for life and dye and his heire grant the reuersion to B. and the Tenant attâ—â—nes If now the lessée grant his estate to another which alieneth in fee to A. B. shall haue a Writ comprehending the assignation and grant of all the estates If lands bee giuen to two men and to the heires of one of them and he which hath the fée simple dies and then the Tenant for life alieneth in fée now the heire of him in remainder may haue this Writ for it lyeth as well for him as for Tenant in reuersion If any Abbot or Prior make a lease for life the lessée alien the Prior dye c the successor may haue this Writ Also tenant in taile may haue it if hee make a lease for life and his lessee alien in fée And it séemes if Tenant in taile make a lease for life of the lessee and dye the issue in taile may choose to bring a Formdon or Writ of Entrie in Consimili casu against the alienée whilst the lessée for life is yet liuing for the alienée which is Tenant in the Action cannot plead in Abatement of the Writ that the Demandant hath title to a Formedone But if Tenant in taile make a lease for terme of his owne life which is no discontinuance if now the lessee alien in fee and the lessor dye his heire cannot haue a Writ de consimili casu but he is driuen to his Formedone for in this case he hath no title to other Actions by colour of any demise But in the former case he had title by reason of the discontinuance made for life to claime by right of the new reuersion discended so that hee had a double title the reuersion reserued sur le seas and the title in taile consequently election of Action Quaere P. 17. Ed. 3. A lease made for life the remainder to another in fée the lesses aliened in fée and a writ de consimili casu brought by him in the remainder and it abated for the Court said that hee in remainder was not possessed in fait till the remainder did fall after the death of the â—essée Saith Fiâ—zherbert the Law is not so taken at this day but that hee in remainder hath the remainder vested in him as well as hath hee in the reuersion for hee may haue an action of waste and enter for alienation of his tenement as well as hee in the reuersion may Ergo hee hath his remainder in faâ—t and mee séemeth this Iudgement was not well giuen saith Fitzherbert And
garde at the age of 14. yeares THe principall reason that mooved our law founders so soone to set women out of ward is none other then hath béene already declared she is quickly able domui preesse viro subesse and her husband for her shall doe Knights service or some other for him and in his stead the cases are therefore 26 H. 8. fo 2 If the Kings tenant in chiefe having feoffees to his use marry his daughter vnder age to a man of full age and dye this daughter being heire is out of ward for her body though not for her land for that shal be in ward in this case an the Kings possession must bee voided by suite and livery But had she béene of full age of 14. yeares at her fathers death no such thing had néeded neither should she have bin in ward nor the King have any primer seisin For that was not as yet seene into by the Statutes of H. 7. which had given ward reliefe and herriots upon the death of him which died intestate and seised of onely a bare use againe if the King have a woman ward which he marrieth before she be 14 she shal be be to all intents out of ward at 14. and may immediatly sue her livery 28. H. 8. for as a ward masculine married by his Lord vnder 21. shal be sui luris at 21. so shall a ward feminine being maried before 14. bee out of ward at 14. altogether In the old Natura brevium in the writ de electione custodiae it is said that where the tenant marieth his daughter being under age to a man of ful age dieth the daughter shal be out of ward But if he mary his daughter being of full age to a man under age and die she shall be in ward This Mr. Brooke taketh to be no law even so doe I his reason is that no Lord can have the marriage of her that is already married or compell any heire to be twice married For if a tenant marry his son and die and then the sonnes wife dieth holden the Lord shall not have his body in ward to marry him Which is cleare specially if the sonne were infra annos nubiles at the time of his fathers death But certainely if the Lord couple his ward to a wife which dieth the ward is at full liberty for his body and shall not be married by his Lord. The reason why an heire female of full age married by her father to a man under age should not be out of ward must be because the supposition of law faileth her husband is not able arma portare officiis fungi militaribus vel pro iisdem faciendis cum alio pacisci But this notwithstanding me thinketh a woman married should bee out of ward for all her husbands nonage thought the woman bee but twelve yeares old a boy knight shall be out of ward for his body shall a woman innupta matura viro be in kéeping of any but her husband shall shee at 14. yeares age bee ward because she hath a husband but 19. yeare olds who should not have béene in ward had she had no husband at al non videtur The husbands ability to doe souldiers service is neither the onely nor the principall cause in mine opinion why a woman is by law out of ward at 14. yeares age But law going with the trace or tide of nature that hath made women as Bracton saith fit to carry cey and key cloge betimes suffereth them to mary very early And it should be a mischievous inconvenient unjust and unnatural law that should hold a woman from her husband or from her inheritance which is without offence of law maried fully able to bring forth children because her husband is not fully fit for all mannor of horsemanship Be not therefore good woman absterred from a young husband by old natura brevium SECT XII How a woman that hath beene in ward shall come by her land A Woman past 14. yeares of age at her ancestors death shall not be in ward And where she is in ward till 16. she may have action at 16. against her Lord for her inheritance according to the Statute By Littleton she may enter which standeth with reason for the Statute giving action to her affirmatiuely doth not disaffirme the entrie which she might have had by the auncient catholicke Common law if shee cannot or dare not enter she may have alone if she be alone or with her fellowes if she be a coheire a writ of mortdancester as well against her Lord as against any other abator Marlbridg ca. 16. But if shee be ward to the King against whom a mortdancestor writ of Aile Besaile or Cosinage then it melts into petition and she must sue for livery And where the King hath a woman in ward with some lands holden of other Lords in socage such a ward shall not so soone as shee is 14. yeare old have livery of that socage lands but she must arry unlesse she be married in the meane while till she be 16. because livery must be at once parcell not by percels Yet if 3. copartners be in ward to the King she which first commeth to age shall sue her livery and have partition vpon it SECT XIII Of Parceners FOr it must not be omitted there where a man dieth seised of any manner of inheritance having issue none but daughters to whom such inheritance descendeth when they have entered by Litt. they are parceners one heire to their common ancestor so are the heires of females parceners and they ought to come in by descent for if by purchase they are jointenants they are called partners saith he because they are compellable by a writ de partitione facienda to divide the inheritance amongst them Like or the same law is where a man dying seised having no issue his land goeth to his sisters or aunts that are partners if one of them dye before partition made her part shall descend to her issue and for want of issue to her coheires which shal be déemed and adjudged in by discent and not by survivour SECT XIII Difference betweene partners and jointenants FOr although partners have a conjoyned estate yet law maketh a great diversity betwixt them and jointenants Partners by the cōmon law are onely females or the heirs of females which also must be in by descents for if sisters makeajoint purchase they are jointnants and not partners Betwixt whom observe here the germaine apparent difference If two coparceners be of lands in fee simple wherof one before partition made chargeth her part with a rent dieth without issue her coparcener taking as heire and by discent shall hold the land charged But it is otherwise betwixt jointenants Also partners may devise and give away their part by testament so cannot jointenants SECT XV. Difference betweene partners and tenants in common ANd as in the cases precedent parteners are like tenants in
common so in that which followeth they are like jointenants If two sisters enter into their deceased fathers lands and every of them having issue a sonne dieth before partition so that one moitie descendeth to one sonne and one moitie to another which sons enter and occupy the lands in common if they bee now disfeised they shall have but one assise and not severall assises Because although they come in here by divers discents yet still they are partners and that not onely in regard of the seisin possession which their mothers had but rather in respect of the estate which descended to their mothers from the common ancestors the grandfather to whom they are but one heire so that of a disseisin before partition they shal have but one assise SECT XVI Difference of partners from both jointenants and tenants in Common BY Bryan 10. Ed. 4 fo 3. one copartner may in feoffe another copartner for though their possession bee joint yet their right and interest is severed so that if one sister die the other shall claime a moitie by discent from her and not the intire inheritance from the Common auncestors Partners in this therefore are like tenants in Common whose title and right are separated and therefore they may infeoffe one another But it is otherwise with jointenants whose right is intire and goeth with the possession by survivour Againe partners may release the one unto the other and in this they are like jointenants only for if one tenant in Common release to his fellow his moitie passeth not because that hee to whom the release is made hath in the franck tenemeÌ„t of this moitie no possession But partners whose right is from one roote have a more co 〈…〉 ect possession then tenants in common and may release one unto another To conclude this point partners differ from both jointenants and tenants in common in this that partners are and alwaies were compellable to make partition so was neyther of the other two before the Statute 31. H. 8. cap. 1. which ordaineth that jointenants tenants in common of inheritance which in England or Wales in the right of themselves or their wives shal be compellable by writ de participatione to be devised in Chancery to make partition And that after partition they and their heires shall have mutuall aid one of another for the deraigning of a warranty peramount to recover pro rata as is used betwixt partners at the common law Afterward 32. H. 8. cap. 32 it is ordeined that if any have equal estate with others or in common jointly for tearme of life or for yeares or unequal estate with such as have an adhering inheritance they shall likewise be coÌ„pellable to make partition Provided that this shall not bee prejudiciall to any person other then the parties to it their executors or assignes SECT XVII Of the Nuper obiit BVt ere wee goe any further in partition let us sée what actions may lie betwixt partners for their inheritance before they have divided it And first of the Nuper obiit This is a writ and commandement of the King to the sheriffe to summon a coheir to be before the Kings iustices at a day certaine to shew why she or he for it lieth betwixt parcenersin Gavell kind also deforceth the plaintiffe coheire from her reasonable part belonging to her of the inheritance of I. S. their grandfather father uncle brother grandmother aunt sister or cousin as the case requireth whose heires they be qui Nuper obiit ut dicitur This writ lieth for lands holden in fée simple onely betwixt coheires where one or more of them deforceth or holdeth out his or their fellow coheire or coheire c. It must be brought in the name of all those which be deforced though in verity there be but one that sueth And this 1. may haue a writ of summoneas ad sequenduÌ„ against her negligent copartners who if they appeare not the sole plaintiffe shall be receiued to sue for her portion against the deforcer If after the ancestors death a kinsman enter claiming by descent the Nuper obiit lieth not against him but after entry and ouster an assise of novell disseisin or a writ of right for though coheires may haue Amordancester against a stranger yet can they not haue it against one of their owne parenteale priuy in blood and claiming by the same descent and where a writ of right sometimes is betwéene sisters as where one is infeoffed by déed and another claimeth by discent battaile lieth not nor the grand assise but an inquest in licu thereof Thus far V. N. B. The New Na. Bre. not disagréeing saith further That if one sister deforce another of the land whereof her ancestor died seised in estate of fée taile the remedy must bee by forme done and not by Nuper obiit a Nuper obiit may bée brought of the seisin of the aile besaile or the tresaile and if it be brought of the seisin of the grandfather Darreigne seisin in the father is no good plea without shewing that hée died seised This writ may be brought by the aunt against her sister and niece or by the aunt and niece against another sister niece or by one sister against another that is but of the halfe blood But if the father giue part of his land in francke mariage to one daughter and dye seized c. the donée in francke mariage shall not haue a Nuper obiit against her sister for her part in residue of her fathers fée simple laÌ„d unles she put her land in hotch pot which was given in francke mariage A nuper obiit must be brought by a coheire deforced against all the other coparceners though some of them haue nothing to doe in the demand A villein and his wife shal not haue a Nuper obiit against the coparceners of his wife for hee is not infranchised by marriage with one of those seignioresses to whom hee was bound If a coparcener be deforced by a coparcener and by astranger the deforced may haue a Nuper obiit against her coparcener and iointenancie abateth not the writ no more shall non-tenure of parcell of the thing demanded by rule of the register If two coparceners enter after the ancestors death and deforcing a third parcener doe afterward make partition and then one of them alieneth her portion in fée the deforced partner may by a Nuper obiit against her two coheires notwithstanding the alination recouer a third part of that which is not aliened and a third part of that which is aliened by a mortdancester or writ of Aile as the case lieth and in her owne name and in the name of her two coparceners against the alienâ—â— If one coparcener infeoffe a stranger in fee and take backe an estate in fee or for life it seemeth a Nuper obiit is maintenable still against her so long as she disclaime not in the blood c. But 21. Ed. 3. and
and by similitude of reason saith Fitzherbert it is a good partition where two Mannors descend to two Copartners that the one shall haue one Mannor by name and the other the other for a yeare to change possession the next yeare and so forth from yeare to yeare commutatiuely betwixt them and their heyres for euer No. na br 62. l. m. Et auxi partie que lun auera le terâ— in ta laut le ter in fee simple est bone partic And partners may make partition for terme of life or for terme of yeares and if one Co-partner lease her part to another Co-partner for terme of yeares yet shée may sue a Writ of partition against her partner the Lessée though the terme be vnexpired 33. Hen. 8. Dyer 52. is a quaere If the one of two Co-partners lease for terme of yeares that which to her belongeth and after the other bringeth a Writ of partition against the Lessor to whom in this partition there is alotted a lesse portion then the due some thinke saith he that the Lessée without remedie must hold himselfe contented aswell as the partner which leased But if the partition had beene without writ quaere SECT XIX Of partition by Writt VVHen Copartners cannot all agree to make partition amongst themselues the aptest meane to compell them is a Writ of partition And if there be foure Copartners one may haue this writ against three or two against two or thrée against one The gist of it by the old Na. bre is where the one entereth kéeping out the other and refusing to make partition but lâ—â—t layeth it where they be all in possession and so soundeth the Writt it selfe for it is a commandement to the Sheriffe Si A. fecâ—â—it te securum c. summoneas B. that she come and shew why she refuseth or permitteth not partition of a Mannor or a wood or such like the which with the appurtenances the said A. and B. doe hold together vndiuided of the inheritance of â— their father Mother or c. Fitzherbert in his Writt of partition setteth downe the forme as a Carpenter should set vp a frame of a Cottage being both to shew on what soile it should stand for he sheweth not the generall gist of his Writ and that his President might make plaine which is not doubtfull that when Partners are in possession one or more may haue a partitione faciunda yet he toucheth not the question whether a Partner ousted or not suffered to enter may haue it 40. Hen. 7. fo 9. in a Writ of partition Keble pleadeth for his Clyent that the defendant was sole seised sans ceo that he held pro indiuiso with the Plaintiffe by Vauisour that is no good plea for admit that shee bee sole seised yet partition lieth well enough but by Brian Chiefe Iustice it is hath been adiudged a good plea in our books for one shall not come to diuide that with another wherein he hath no part And saith Keble in a Writ of waste betwéene tenants in Common it is a good trauerse Non tenet insimul pro indiuiso likewise is it here where we haue trauersed the point and supposall of your Writ and the partie by nuper obâ—jt may recouer in seueraltie and partition shall be made and it was said that the seisin of one parcener is the seisin of both and so the reporter thinketh if one enter c. Where she which entereth claimeth in the name of her selfe and of her partner I can well agrée or if she enter not denying the right of her fellow And if after the death of the common Ancestor A. which is one Coheyre enter silent into the whole inheritance B the other Coheyre may now perhaps without other entry in the name of her selfe and her Companion maintaine a possessorie action against a stranger but when a Sister entereth vindicating all to her selfe by purchase or obiecting against her Sister Bastardie or Attainder and keeping her out of possession this I trow is no entry of both but such a deforcing as the Writs de rationabili parte and the nuper obijt were made to redresse If euery seisin of a partner must néeds be the seisin of all those that can claime as coheyres then there is no deforcing or néed at all of the forenamed writs But séeing that law hath appointed them for lands in see-simple and a formedone for land in taile against deforcers of their coparceners I say that seisin of one of them is not seisin to all of them and hauing a chiefe Iustice on my side I dare hold that non tenet pro indiuiso is a good plea in a Writt of partition which if it be brought by her that is deforced and out of possession it commeth preposterously out of kind and season and out of the order that our Law-founders at the first ordained See Brooke Coparceners per totum ou entrie de vn est le entrie del auter vers estrange pur lour advantage mes nemie pur disaduantage 43. Ed. 3. 19. lentrie d'un nest l'entrie de ambideux entre eux mesmes 40. E. 3. 8. By whom and how the Writt of partition must be brought at this day COheyres in Gauell kinde may compell one another to make partition by Writt but then they must mention the custome in their declaration If one Coparcener dye hauing issue c. her husband being tenant by the courtesie is compellable to make partition but he cannot compell c. by the Common Law for the Writt lieth naturally for none but parceners Fitzherbert and the old na bre haue a note out of the Register that in the 12. of King Ed. they tell not which there was sealed a Writ of partition at Barwicke betwéene strange persons and there it was said it might bee granted betweene any Coheyres or fellow tenants without naming de hereditâ—â—e in the Writt where it was likewise affirmed that such a Writt before that time was neuer séene aswell the other bookes of Law as the Statutes of 31. H. 8. make it out of question that this Writt by the Common Law was onely betwixt Coheyres as the two Writts which we haue passed were by custome in some speciall places ioynt-tenants and tenants in Common might haue a Writt of partition as Fitzherbert setteth downe by the Custome of London Writt of partition lyeth against tenant by the curtesie Littleton 264. Dyer 1. M. 98. Brief de partit at this day lye against the Feoffée of one Coparcener but not for a Feoffée mes vide Dyer 3. M. 128. Likewise before the Statutes if a man were both tenant in Common and tenant in Copartnerie as hauing one third part by purchase from one Sister and another in the right of his Wife he and his wife might bring a Writt of partition which see Nat. br fol. 61. It hath béene much doubted whether partition by agréement betwixt tenants in Common or ioynt-tenants were good without déed But
obligation or other déed of grant as an escrow with condition c. vt supra that it should haue no relation at all saue onely to the last deliuery for if hée to whom an obligation is so made release all action to the Feme sole before performance of the condition and before deliuery of the déed by the baylée he may notwithstanding sue vpon the obligation when it is deliuered which proues that it takes none effect till the last deliuery and then it must néeds bee void if the Woman be married at time of this deliuery if all were not countermanded presently by taking a husband But Parkins will not yéeld to these reasons for the Feme sole was a person able to oblige her selfe in any manner of Contract and her couenants and agréements made vpon consideration she could not countermaund though she would If a Feme sole seised of Land infeoffe a stranger by déede indented reseruing rent to her and her heyres to be paid annually at Easter with a conditionall clause of entry for non-payment and then they two inter-marry c. héere can be no failing in performance of payment during couerture for all this while the rent and condition are suspended If the condition had béen to pay ten or an hundred pound it had béene drunke vp by the inter-marriage for if a feme sole make a feoffement to a stranger vpon condition to pay her ten pound and then she marrieth with I. S. I. S. before the day of payment may release all manner of conditions duties and demands and the condition shall be determined But such a release comming after the day wherein the condition should haue beene performed at what time the wife hath a title of entrie will not binde her or her heyres after the husbands death Par. fo 148. There followeth a question if a Feme sole infeoffeth a man of blacke acre by indenture with Condition that hee shall infeoffe her of green acre before Easter and they two marry and continue married till after Easter whether the husband be maine-tenant seised of blacke acre in-the right of his wife There followeth in Par. fo 149. a case ayding towards solution of this doubt If I be bound by obligation to a Feme sole to marry her by munday next if shee marry a stranger and the espousals continue till tewsday I néed not tender my selfe to her A Feme sole makes cognizance of her right to leuie a fine before Commissioners per dedimus potestatem hauing the Writt of Couenant vt oportet and at the day giuen in banke when the Concord should be recorded the woman is married but notwithstanding the fine was recorded and ingrossed as leuied by a Feme sole the question was whether it should binde the Husband or not it was said death of a partie c. which as the act of God dissolues the whole busines by abatement of the Writ but marrying after the teste of the Writ of Couenant and dedimus potestatem and Cognizance made doth not so The woman therefore and her heyres are bound for euer and the Husbands release of all his right to the Conusée makes all cléere 7. 8. Eliz Dyer 246. the Lord Keeper of the great seale of England his case SECT XIII Of Acts done by a Feme Couert EUery Feme Couertis quodammodo an infant for sée her power euen in that which is most her owne A wife may be seised in her owne right with her husband in estate of Inheritance but if she make liuery and seisin to another in any parcell of this Inheritance by her selfe alone without grée of her Husband it is voyd yea her Husband and shee together may maintaine an assise vpon the entry but where onely the Baron is seised and the Feme maketh liuery the assise must bee onely by the Baron in his owne name Par. 38. Likewise fo 2. he telleth vs where a man is seised in the right of his wife and the wife grants a rent charge out of her owne Land the Husband not knowing it or the Husband knowing but not consenting but the déed is onely in the name of the wife this grant is voyd Admit the Husband be vagrant out of the Countrey and the Wife ignorant of his life or death grants a rent Charge by deede reciting that shee is sole yet if the Grantée enter and distraine for the rent the husband may maintaine an Action of Trespasse for this entrie Admit that this vna caro Baron and Feme through false loue or iealousie bee set at nine miles asunder variance and certaine Lands are assigned to the Wife by the Baron for her maintenance if the Wife grant a rent Charge out of this Land it is meerely void If a Feme Couert grant a rent Charge out of her land by fine as though she were sole this bindeth not the Husband but if he die before hee and his Feme haue reuersed their fine by error the Feme shall be bound And if to a Feme Couert there be a feoffement made a feoffement and liuery is of great celebritie yet a naked disagréement of the Baron auoydeth it 1. H. 7. fo 16. If a Feme Couert her Husband being beyond the Seas bee enfeoffed of an acre of Land and the Husband comming home refuseth and causeth the Wife likewise to relinquish all manner of seisin or taking any profits of the Land this in a Writt of entry sur disseisin in le per brought against the Baron and Feme will discharge the Husband of damages from the time of the refusall but not for the occupation before refusall tamen quaere Par. fo 10. yet saith he they remaine Tenants for all the refusals of the Franke Tenement to vse any action so long as none other person entereth but if a Tenant when his Seignior is beyond the Seas doe infeoffe his Lords wife ioyntly with a stranger of the Tenancie and the Lord comming home distraines the cattle of the stranger for his rent this distresse is a compleat disagréement and puts the Wife out of seisin so that now the possession remaines intirely to the stranger the ioynt feoffée otherwise the husband should be at a shrewd mischiefe viz. without remedie for his rent for all the time incurred before the distresse Par. 10. Note that in these Cases it is no plea for the grauntor to say that the Baron did not agrée but hee must shew the disagréement A Feme Couert may be a disseiseresse without assent of the Baron and hee shall be charged with damages in assise against him and his wife But if the Baron doe a disseisin to the vse of his wife and she agrées to it the Franke Tenant for all this setleth not in her for the entry of a husband gaineth nothing to his wife but where she hath either right of entry as vpon disseisin or title of entry as vpon a Condition c. A Feme Couert makes a Testament of the goods of her husband she dieth
hath not the force of a negatiue implying in nul auter manner then is therein described Amy is therefore a ioynt purchaser with her husband in estate for life and not in or by descent of estate taâ—â—e Now to say that her right and estate should change by silent operation of the Law after shee was repossessed that cannot be for the whole entry is tolled and if she be not remitted by her first possession and reprisall she is neuer remitted If a Disseisour make feoffement to the vse of the Disfeisée and after the Disseisor enter he shall be remitted but before his entry he shall not be remitted for he shall be adiudged in possession by vertue of the Statute but so soone as hee entreth he is remitted for his entry was neuer tolled But Amy Townesends entry was cleane taken away by the discontinuance c. further if she should be remitted by the Statute of 27. the remainders should be all destroyed contrary to the text of the same Statute And to the inconueâ—iencie alleadged if she shall not be remitted shee shall hold incombred with the charges of her Husband that is none at all for Amy after her husbands death might haue disagréed and relinquished the vse with possession annexed to it by bringing a cui in vita against him next in remainder for in him by such disagréement or vser of action had the remainder vested as though the woman had beene a Monke or dead person in Law or neuer named in the limitation If the vse had béene to Amy Townsend in fée she might haue brought her cui in vita against the Feoffor or his heyre by which they shall be Tenants to her action and so might the inâ—umbrance haue béene auoyded for when a feoffement is to the vse of one which refuseth the vse it shall be in effect as if the vse had beene limited to Paules stéeple or to Charing-Crosse all falling or reflecting because the Feoffor hath no recompence or consideration to his vse and hee shall be Tenant to euery Precipe It was further agreed that as the Cause fell out Amy Townesend could not be remitted though her possession had returned by refeoffemeÌ„t at the Common Law because Sir Roger Townesend her Husband outliued her for 21. Ed. 3. the Case is Baron made a Feoffement the Feoffée â—einfeoffe the Baron and Feme and heyres of the wife she woman dyed the Heyre entred the Baron brought an Assise which was iudged maintainable for whilest the Baron liued he was tenant to the heyres action And the thâ— Iudgement was that Amy Townsend was neuer remitted the reason was indéed because there is nothing in the Statute of 27. to make a remitter for the clause of sauing of Drâ—its Titles and Actions is of such right c. as was before the Statute and not of any right title or action risen since or after it Now note that as a Lease made for twenty yeares by Baron and feme Tenants for life binds not any remainder by the Statute which speaketh onely that Leases made by Tenants of Inheritance shall binde heyres and Successors so I would inferre that if the Leassors inheritance be determined whether it were iure vxoris in taile or otherwise in taile the remainder must be frée from the Statute But note that the point which made me choose this case for illustration of the Statute is this Amy Townesend was iudged not remitted because she had no title of entry but onely by the 27 c. of vses and therefore she must néeds claime her possession according to the vse But put Case the Feoffement had béene since the Statute of 32 the Law would then haue iudged a remitter for by Littleton where any persons entry is congeable which taketh estate for life or in fée it is a remitter if the reprisall be not by Indenture or record or some matter of estoppell for alwayes where there is a double right or title the Law must iudge for the best as well in the entry as in the possession and an Indenture made by Baron and Feme is none estoppell to the Wife by the Common Law Concerning the Case 21. Ed. 3. Wilby which gaue iudgement thought the Barons aduantage a hinderance to the Remitter yet if he died the wife should be remitted But if you looke Brooke remitter 21. and 41. ye shall finde that the Feme was maintenant remitted though to saue the husbands aduantage of warranty they would not so iudge it quod mirum saith Brooke and quaere quia contrarium a ceo iour SECT XXVII Whether acceptance or taciturnity may not take away an entry at this day NO fine feoffement or other act done by the husband onely shall make any discontinuance or be preiudiciall to the wife but that she may enter c. what if Baron and Feme make a feoffement or Lease for life by solemne Indentures with Liuery and seisin cleere this takes not away at this day the wiues entry after Couerture ended But admit when shee is a widdow shee refuseth to enter and accept payment of rent or performance of couenants is not now both her entry and her action gone also euen as in case of an Infant which makes such a feoffement or Lease and accepts the rent when he is of full age The question must be answered out of the Statute and in mine opinion there is nothing in it to ayde a woman after such ratification by acceptance volenti non fit iniuria nec inuitis confirmantur beneficia A Lease by Baron Feme per Indenture is not voyd presently by the Barons death But whereas before she was driuen to suit and action shee may now enter by the Statute yet it compels her not to enter neither caâ—teth any frée-hold vpon her In like manner if the Baron alone alien his Wiues Land by fine with proclamation the Wife may enter by force of this Statute but per opinionem totius curiae Ed. 6. Dyer fo 72. If she suffer fiue yeares to passe and expire without entry or vser of action she and her heyres shall be barred for euer for this Statute of 32. though it limit no time for the womans entry yet it speaketh nothing of fines with proclamation and therefore it takes not the generall Law made 4. Hen. 7. cap. 24. of fines with proclamation And sée Sir Ed. Cokes 8. Rep. fo 72. in Grenlies case SECT XXVIII Of Fines SEe further the case 18. Eliz. Dyer 351. Land holden in socage was giuen to a man and his wife in taile the remainder in sée to the Barons right heyres the Baron alone leuied a fine with proclamation to his owne vse and afterward by his last will and Testament in writing deuised the Land to his wife for life the remainder ouer to a Stranger vpon condition to pay certaine rent annually out of the land with Clause of distresse c. the Baron died the wife entering and claiming estate onely for life paid rent
vnques seisi que Dower c. THere are other pleas that goe to the action and verie right of Dower as Ne vnques seisi que Dower c. id est The husband had neuer any seisin or state of Inheritance where of the wife can claime Dower sée 45. E. 3. fol. 13. The tenant in Dower leased her whole estate to the heire rendring rent for terme of her life the heire died and this was adiudged a seisin whereof the heires wife might demand Dower though the first tenant in Dower were still aliue for the lease was a Surrender and if a stranger had entred immediately after the heires death his heire must haue had a Mordancester Ergo said one the wiâ—e dowable Yet marke this case â—bid a man seised c. in fée simple dies his sonne entreth and he dies the sons sonne enters and endowes his Aylâ—sâ—e she dies a stranger abateth In this case it is cleere the sons wiâ—e shall haue no Dower of the portion assigned to the Aylesse though the sonnes sonne may haue a Mordancester per Kirton Finch and Mowbray But betwiâ—t this casâ— and the other they say is great oddes for here the Grandmother endowed was in from her husâ—â—â—â— and she sonnes possession and estate howsoeuer to his â—â—ire in whom the fée rested it were not destroyed but hee might bring a Mordancester yet to his wiâ—e it was cleane adnihilate whereas in the first case the Fée and Francktenâ—ment not a whit impeached by the life of her which surrendred were perfectly conâ—â—â—ned in the Baron to whom the Surrender was made And if a râ—uersion be granted to I. S. of certaine lands per faiâ— in pais in which lands I. T. and his wiâ—e haue â—state for life which doe atturne and afterward surrender there is no doubt but I S. his wife if hee die shall hauâ— Dower though it bee indéed defeasible after death of T. K. if his wiâ—e suruiue and will vndâ—â— the Surrendâ—r whereas in our first case the Surrender is no way auoydable but the heires wife shall pay rent according to her portion per Finch â—bâ—â— 14. Ed. 4. fol. 6. Tenant by the courtesâ—e granted his estate to him in reuersion rendring rent with clause of re-entrie for non payment the Grantée married the rent was arréere tenant per le curteâ—â—e re-entred hee in the reuersion died his wife waâ—â—arred of Dower for the Surrâ—nder might well bee vpon candition 2. H. 4. fol. 22. In action of Dower it was pleaded that the Demandants husband had nothing in the land â—ut by 〈◊〉 done to the tenant Iudgement si action c. The woman shewed how her husbands father hauing two sonnes leased his land to the eldest sonne and to hiâ— wife for 〈◊〉 of theâ—r liues and that shee her selfe married with the youngest sonne the eldest died and his wife married with the tenant the father died the reuersion descended to the second sonne being her husband the tonants wife died and he kept possession the Demandants husband did put him out he re-entred she prayed seifin c. Brooke thinketh she ought to haue trauersed the Disseisin And if the Baron had not entred after the death of the eldest sonnes wife she should not haue béene endowed yet saith he 〈◊〉 if without entrie there had not beene a seising in Law and whether the Francktenement which the tenant had once in right of his wife â—e determined in puncto by her death 11. H. 4. 73. In action of Dower the Tenant saith That N. gaue the land to the Baron and his first wife for terme of their liues the remainder in taile to the tenant remainder in Fée to the right heires of the Baron his first wife diâ—d he married this demandant and then hée died and the tenant entred c. he demands Iudgement if of this estate she shall haue Dower This amounted plaine to ne vnques seisi que Dower la puit but per Hanke Thirn that plea might not serue by reason of the Fée simple in remainder which might ingender doubtâ—ulnesse a layes gentes But where a lease was made to Baron for life the reuersâ—on to the Lessor or remainder to a stranger there in action of Dower ne vnques â—eiâ—â— â—ec iâ— good for no manner of Inheritance was in the husband 11. H. 4. 83. Dower was demanded of twentie pounds rent respondetur the Baron had nothing but â—oyntly with â— N. who is yet aliue â—udgement si Dower c. and he was not compelled to shew whether he pleaded as â—ertenant or as Pernor of the rent the Demandant replyed that I. N. had released all his right in the rent â—â— her husband But becauss she shewed not the Déed of â—â—â—ease shee pleaded by aduisement of the Câ—urt seisie que Dower la puit Quaere of the generall â—ssue against the â—â—eciall matter 11. H. 4. 88. A woman shall haue Dower of rent 〈◊〉 chased by her husband in fée though hee die before dâ—â— of payment And if it be pleaded against her Ne vnques fâ—â—â—â— que Dower c. she shall not shew the speciall matter but say seisi que Dower la puit and shew the matter iâ—â—â—â—dence 22. H. 6. 4â— per Newton In action of Dower the â—â—nant plead Ioynt estate to the Baron and I. N. in plein vy whose estate he hath the demandant shall not say â—â—â—â—â— que dower c. vnlesse shee shew how or trauerse that I. N. tooke nothing by she Feoâ—ment â—9 H. 6. fol. 9. Against Dower the Tenant pleadeâ— that I. S. seised in Fée infeoffed him and hee leased to the Baron to hold at will which estate hee continued all his life time sâ—ns câ—o that he was seised of any such estate que Dower la puit the Iudges orderad that for the long continuance of the possession and dought deslais gâ—â—â— all should be entred 10. H. 6. 17. It is not a good plea against Dower â—o say the Baron had nothing but for terme of his life for this amounts to the generall 〈◊〉 Ne vnques seisi que Dower la puit But to say the Baron had nothing but 〈◊〉 ment with A. in fée and that A. suruiued c. This by â—â—â— Fée simple confessed makes a good plea. 14. H. 6. 5 6. In action of Dower the tenant said â—e was seised till by the Baron disseised vpon whom he re-entred Iudgement c. the Demandant said that before this tenant had any thing in the land W. being seised in Fée infeoffed her husband issâ—â—t seisi c. and she prâ—â—â—â— to be endowed per Martiâ— the replication is not good â—â—â— this might â—e before the Disseisin and before couerture too and if so then the Baron Ne vnques seisi que Dower la puâ—â— That yée may yet perceiue further how 〈◊〉 a point it is to take or relinquish this plea rightly marâ—â— well the case 30. H. 8. Dyer fol. 41. In a Writ of Dower the issue was Ne vnques
husband till his death then by his death the widdow is made sole Tenant of them so little needing either assignation or other circumstance that without new entry claime or challenge shee may haue action of her owne possession against any other that shall enter If the husband aliened intirely any lease for yéeres of his wiues it is gone irreuocable and if hee make no sale and the wife dyes hee shall haue the leafe except shee bee ioyntly possest with another and the seruing ioyntenant shall haue Commentar vpon Fitzherbert 185. If he aliened part of the estate as for ten yéeres next ensuing where the terme was for twenty the widdow may enter when ten yéeres expired But sée in that Case that if the husband rested a rent and dyes the Executors of the husband shall haue the rent for it was not incident to the reuersion yet the wife shall haue the resioue of the terme Sir Edw. Cokes Commentar vpon Fitzherbert fol. 57. b. if he aliened for the ten last yéeres shee may continue possession till those ten yéeres be commenced If the husband deuise away by his last Testament a terme for yéeres which he hath by right of his wife I suppose the deuise is â—â—id as well as if it were made of some higher estate as it appeares by Perkins chap. Dâ—â—â—ses and Plowd 419 in Bra 〈…〉 gâ—â— case And the Law is all one in all respects where the Baron and Feme are possessed of lease for yeares by intâ—eâ—ties that if the estate be made to them during their couerture or by moyties that is to them ioyntly before marriage or where the Baron is possessed of a lease iure vxoris Sée Dame Haâ—â— case Plowd 260. And if the Baron possest of a lease for yeares in the right of his wife charge the land with a rent and die the rent is gone Plowd 4â—8 in Bracebridges case for shee is remitted And if Feine Gardian in Socrage be and her Baron alienateth it and die the wife may enter And sée Dyer 8. Eliz. 25 the same is of Coppy holds per 〈…〉 der to the vse of a Feme for yeares the wife die the estate rests in the husband without a custome be to the contrary If an husband be possest of a terme for yeares in the right of his wife and Iudgement is had against him and the terme is extended and the husband dieth it shall be good against the wife as appeares by Sir Edw. Cokes 8 Rep. 96. in Maâ—â—ing case And see the 9. case of 50 E. 3. lib. Ass note Sir Edw. Cokes Rep. in â—ulwoods case and Plowd 26â— in Damè Hales casâ— where a lease made to Baron and Feme is extended for the debt of the King after the wiues drath If a man possest of a te me deuiseth it to one for his life the remainder to a woman for her life who takes an husband the husband may release that to the particular tenant although it be but a possibilitie Sir Edw. Cokes 10. Rep. 47. Lampeâ—â—s case And if a woman hath a lease for yeares as Executâ—iâ— and takes an husband hée may sell it per â—oâ— curi 〈…〉 pr 〈…〉 r Fitzherbert Dyer â—8 H. 8. 7. A woman hath a terme 〈…〉 trir the husband s 〈…〉 wits to 〈…〉 vâ—â—n which a moytie is awarded to the pretendor of the title the wife is bound thereby but because the defendant in detinue brought by the wife for the Indenture of lease plead non dâ—tinet and not the speciall matter Iudgement was against him Dyer 2. E 〈…〉 183. 21. H. 7. 6. agrees If the husband discontinue the Franck tenement of his wife the apt instrument whereby to recouer it when she is a widdow is a Cu 〈…〉 vita Which though it be not so necessarie and néedfull perhaps since the Statute of 32. which disableth husbands to discontinue as it was before yet I. perceiue not by what reason the vse of it is forbidden euen in those cases where the entrie is â—ongeable for the vertue of the Writ is not decayed by lawfulnesse of the entrie neither doth free libertie to take possession prohibit the resort to Iustice and action at Law when perhaps a woman cannot or dares not enter By Common Law therefore if the Baron alien in fée the heritage of his wife or her Francktenement by Feoffment or by Demise for terme of life or in taile she may haue remedy after his decease by this Writ Of which the generall forme is Praecipe A. quod â—â—d â—â—â— Bâ—quae fuit vxor Câ—â—â—um messuagium 〈…〉 quod clamat esse ius hereditat suam Et in quod A. noâ— habet ingressum nisi per C. quondam virum c qui illud â—â— de 〈…〉 isit cui in vita contradicere non pot 〈…〉 Th 〈…〉 may be in the per â—ui and post and some varietie it hath according to title of the Demandant as Quâ—â—â— clamat 〈…〉 ius haereditatem or Vt ius maritagium or Vt ius exâ—onâ— I. qui ipsaâ— B. C. virum suum feofavit in quo c. or Quam clamat tenere sibi haeredibusde corpore suo de 〈◊〉 C. quondam viri sui exâ—untibus â—â— d 〈…〉 ne I. or Quam clamat essâ— dotem suam ex dono E. pri 〈…〉 vel secundi c. If Baron and Feme lose the wiues landâ— by de 〈…〉 shée may haue this Writ when shee is a widdow But if the wiues lands be recouered in a Cessauit perâ—de 〈…〉 â—â— Baron and Feme vpon a C 〈…〉 during esp 〈…〉 shall neuer haue a Cuâ—â—â— vita 4. Ed. 2. If Baron and Feme and a third person being Ioyntenants in Fée the Baron alien the intiertie and die his widdow shall haue a Cui in vita of a inoytie during the life of the third person for it séemed the alienation was a seuerance of Ioynture saith Fitzherbert But hée sends vs to 36. Ed. 3. in his Abridgement titulo Cui in vita By which booke the wife in this case cannot haue a Cui in vita for any part so long as the third person suruiueth because they two may ioyne in a Writ of right and if hee die she may haue a Cui in vita of all Vide Librum Of lands which a man and woman purchase ioyntly before couerture the Cui in vita shall be but of a inoytie but of lands purchased ioyntly during coâ—eâ—â—ure the Cui in vita is of the in 〈…〉 e and being brought of a inoytie the Writ is not good 39. H. 6. 45. for in the one case they are seised by inoyties in the other by intireties A woman by excepting lands which she and her late husband tooke in exchange or by excepting rent reserued out of it shall be bâ—â—â—ed in a Cui in vita or any other action Fitzherbert and â—6 Ed. 4. 8. Idem ius if shée accept parcell â—â— her owne land in Dower but 17. Assisarum pl. 3. Brooke 24. Cui in
the Action may bee pleaded that the woman which bringeth the Appeale c. hath taken another husband or that shee was neuer accoupled in loyall matrimony to him of whose death shee brings the Appeale And if it bee brought by the heire it is a good plea in Barre to say the wife of him which is dead is yet aliue and the Action giuen to her In the booke of Entries fol. 50. Praedicta Alicia dicit quod â—â—mpore mortis praedicti Thomae â—adem Alicia fuit vâ—oâ— praedicti Thomae in quo casu â—idem Aliciae non praedicto Nicholao de â—ure pertinet hâ—bere prosequi appellum c. Et vâ—terius â—adem defendens dicit quod praedictus Nicholaâ—s appellum praedictum versus â—andem Aliciam inter Alios per couinam ea intentione ad eam de prosecutione appellinus de morte praedicti Thomae excludendam impetrauit que oia singula c. petit inde allocationem c. quoad felonia non culpabilis Et inde de bono malo ponit se super patriam 30. H. 6. Also it is a good plea in Barre to say that the Plaintiffe hath succeased her time in that shee hath not brought her Appeale within the yeere and day after his death which is supposed slaine or to say that he of whose death the Appeale is brought is yet aliue at such a place and to bring him in the Court that hee may bee viewed and knowne sée thereof 43. Assis pa. 26. in Appeale de morte viri the Defendant pleaded le Baron in viâ— c. and the Plaintiffe contraâ— day was giuen to bring in their proofes which when they came were found one both sides defectiue The Defendant therefore for his safest way pleaded â—on culpabilis videâ—ur ergo that the first issue if it had béene found against him should haue béene peremptacy and that hee may waiue it before triall in fauorem vitae And note that if a man plead not guilty and pute himselfe vpon the Iury in an Inditement of felony and hée may confesse the fact before verdict and pray a coroner otherwise in an Appeale as it was holden 11. Hen. 7. 5. 8. Hen. 4. fol. 18. In Appeale de morte viri and at the day the Baron was brought into Court examined 〈◊〉 knowne and the woman for her false Appeale was committed to prison till she payd a fine The generall barres against all Appeales of which some may bee obiected against the Plaintiffe here are those That the Plaintiffe is attainted of felony or treason or a Monke or a Priest a mayhemed body by some other than by the Plaintiffe or of non sane memorie or deafe and dumb or a layâ—r or a naturall foole Attainder by outlawry if it be erronious is a barre no longer than vntill it bee reuersed It is a good plea in barre also that heretofore the Plaintiffe brought an Appeale of the same felony in which shée was at non suit after Declaration or withdrew her selfe from her Action Or that heretofore shée sued Appeale of the same fellony against another person which was acquited or condemned at her suit Or the Plaintiffes release may bee pleaded in barre if it were made to the Defendant himselfe for release made to another will not serue though it were made to one ioyned with the Defendant in the Appeale Corone in Fitzherbert 9. and 2. Rich. 3. 9. agrées And so if the Plaintiffe withdraw her selfe as against one of the Defendants her Appeale shall stand good against the other And note where the Defendant pleads in barre any of these pleas yet in fauour of 〈◊〉 the Law permits him to plead ouer to the fellony and his pleading shall not therefore be counted double exceptin the case of release in which indéed he may not plead to the felony for not guilty in contrary to accepting of relâ—â—â—â— which â—â—tâ—liâ—th guilt So also of a woman bring Appeale of robery and the Defendant pleads villenage in the Plaintiffe hee shall not conclude ouer to the felony 〈◊〉 culpable for that were an iâ—franchisment But perchance when the villenage is found against the Defendant hee may then take his plea of rien culpable as well as hee shall haue when hée plead any other pleas for if he plead them without concluding to the fellony hée may after his barre is found against him plead rien culpable notwithstanding quod vide 28. E. â— fol. 91. 22. E. 3. fol. 38. 18. E. 3. fol. 32. except only in pleas of release as is said which implieth alwayes a confession of felony 9. Hen. 4. fol. 2. in Appeale de morte viri the Defendants pleaded the wiues release made since the darraine continuance of all accords reall and â—â—rsonall and shée demurred the best opinion was tâ—at reall actions are of things reall and durable as lands rents c. and personall actions are of dammages and such like yet p Hulls personall is as well the punishment of the person as dammages and the punishment here is death which is released le barre is good But Littleton teacheth vs contrary in his booke for hée saith that Appeales of robery rape or death or any Appeale wherein the â—â—dgement is of death are more high than personall Actions and therefore they are not barred by release vnlesse it be of all manner of Actions or of all Appeales See Sir Edward Coke in his Commentaries vpon Littleton fol. 287. b. in any Appeale wherein iudgement is of death a release of all Actions reall and personall is no barre for that release extendeth but to common or ciuill actions and not to criminall but if a release of actions personals is good in an Appeale of mayhem for euery Action wherein dammages are onely recouered is in Law taken for personall fol. 288. a. And in Sir Edw. Cokes 4. Rep. in Hudsons Case it is said although the Appeale of mayhem runneth feloniously â—uy mayma yet he shall recouer but dammages and therefore recouery in trespasse is a good barre therein SECT XII Auterfoits acquit ALthough it be now no plea in Appeale of death for the Defendant to lay that he was here to fore acquite of the same felonie yet because Stanfords handling of it containeth good learning and it may still serue in appealâ— of rape And likewise in Indâ—ctments of death for hée that was acquite in appeale may haue it I will not omit it By Common Law therefore in all Appeales or Inditements of felony for the Defendant to say that hée was Aâ—terâ—oirs aâ—raigne de mesme le felonie before â—uth Iustices and acquited vouching the record is a good plea and he néeds not to haue the record in Court because this plea is not delatorie but in barre Coron in Fitzherbert 2 â— This plea the Common Law disalloweth not because it alloweth that a man should not put his life in ieopardy twice for one and the same offence The acquitall then must be of the verie same offence or
else to haue brought seuerall Appeales whereunto was answered that it two or twenty goe and come together to commit any felâ—ny as robbery or murder though one of them onely commit the Act yet all the rest are principals A third exception against the Declaration was that the Plaintiffe had not shewed how his wife assented after the rauishment and the Appeale was giuen by Wâ—st 2. to the Baron and Feme and not to the Baron alone by the Statute of Rich. 1. But this exception also was disallowed because the Count had recited the whole purueyance of the Act and the rauishment was contra formam c. Last of all the Appellées pleaded that long time before the espousals betwixt the Appellour the woman supposed to be rauished one of the Appellées had affianced the same woman after which affiance the Appellour married her at a certaine Church against her will after which marriage whereunto she neuer agréed she came of her owne accord to the Defendant who had now married her so that the Appellour and she were neuer coupled in loyall matrimony This manner of pleading was said to be a conâ—ession both of the first marriage and of the rauishment which the Councell would haue taken by protestation But â—â—â—scoigne told them they might not haue protestation to proue them guiltie of felony Therefore the Defendant pleaded generally Ne vnques accouple c. which the Plaintiffe accepted of his owne accord and a Writ was awarded to the Bishop But all mens opinions seemed to be that this was no good plea because the Statute is that the husband shall haue the Appeale though they agréed that when the Action is by Common Law as an Appeale De morte viri ne vnques accouple is a good plea for no woman shall reuenge her husbands death by Appeale vnlesse shee were wife as well in right as in possession The Statute of Richard giueth the Appeale where the woman rauished hath no husband to her father or next of bloud c. which is vnderstood vt supra where the woman consenteth to the rauisher for otherwise the woman her selfe must pursue the Appeale vpon West 2. cap. 34. for the father cannot haue by the Common Law either Appeale of rape of his daughter or of death either of son or Daughter But it séemeth that by this Statute if a woman be next heire to her which is rauished and consenteth she may haue an Appeale of rape against the rauisher as well as any procheuie heire male may And learne If a woman which is rauished dye and her husband takes another wife whether hée may now haue an Appeale or no. It is said that if a Lord rauish his Nief she cannot haue an Appeale of rape against him but the King may punish it by way of Indictment SECT XXX Within what time Appeales of Rape must be commenced BY Bracton Si virgo sit corrupta oppressa conâ—â—â— pacem Domini Regis she ought to goe straight way Dâ—â— idem factum recens est and with â—ue and Cry complaine to the good men of the next towne shewing her wrong her garments torne 〈◊〉 and then she ought to goe to the chiefe Consâ—â—ble to the Coroner and to the Viscount and at the next Countie to en er her Appeale and haue it enroâ—led in the Coroners â—oll and then day was to bee giuen her till the comming of the Kings Iustices before whom she was againe to re-intreat her Appeale and if she varied from the Coroners roll she lost her suit Briâ—ton tieth the commencement of this Appeale to fortie dayes after the fact agreeing with West 1. â—ap 13. But by this Statute saith Sâ—aâ—ford rape was but trespasse insomuch therefore as it is since made felony by another Statute and no time limitted within whiâ—h the suit shall be begâ—n it séemeth a woman is at choyse to bring it when shée listeth so that shee exceed not time reasonable SECT XXXI Wiâ—hin what Countie Appeale of Rape shall be brought APpeale of rape must be brought within the Countie where the rauishment was committed and if a man take a woman against her will in one Countie and leading or carrying her into another Countie he there rauisheth her the Appeale must bée where the rauishment was committed and though the Declaration be of taking in another Countie yet the triall shall be onely where the Writ was brough Titulo vâ—sâ—e in Fiâ—zherbert 28. And it séemeth that to speake of the taking in another Countie in a Declaration of Rape is but surplussage and more than needeth for it abates not the Count if it be left out But perhaps such a leauing out in Action of trespasse would abate the Writ because the Plaintiffe is to recouer dammages for the taking in another Countie and they of the Countie where the Writ is brought cannot assesse dammages for the taking But in this Appeale there is nothing to be recouered but onely that the offâ—nder sâ—ffer death for his offence SECT XXXII The Declaration in Appeale of Rape 47. E. 3. fol. 14. IS a good forme of Declaration in this Appeale where in a Writ of Appeale of rape the plaintiffe counted how she was in Gods peace and the Kings such a day such a yeare and in such a place and the Defendant came feloniously and as a Feion againâ—â— the Kings Crowne and dignitie then and there did râ—â—iâ—â—â—er and carnally know her and that shée did pursue him from Towne to Towne and from Countie to Countie till he was taken at her suit and that A and B. were at the same time and place in force and aid of the same Felon c. And if the Defâ—ndant will this deny she is ready to proue it as the Court shall award that a woman ought But know that the seuerall Statutes haue made two seuerall formes of Appeales of rape one vpon the Statute of West 2. and in that there needs â—â— mention of any Statute But in the other which is vpon the Statute of Richard the vse is alwayes to recitâ— the Statute in the Declaration and that the words Contra formam statuti implyeth sufficiently that the woman hath consented to the rauisher SECT XXXIII Pleas to the wâ—it PLeas to the Writ may be many as false â—atine or want of â—orâ—â— or that the Plaintisse hath another Writ hanging of the same feâ—ony as is sâ—ewed you before â—â— the other Appeale And 5. H. 6. Fol. 1. Exception was taken against the Writ â—â— Appeale of â—apâ— because it was ad respoâ—dendum the Plaintiffe seâ—undâ—m formam staâ—â—ti c. Whereas it ought to haue béene Vnde eum appellat secundum formam statuti Whereunto it was anâ—â—dred that the Statute of 6. â— 1. giueth not the Appeale for that is by the Common Law but he must answer according to the Statute which outeâ—h â—attaile for the Statute saith Ad duellum vadiandum non recipiatur issint le briefe bone Another exception was taken against the