plead in person afterwards that he is Prior of the Church of St. Peter and Paul for that is parcell of the name which cannot be pleaded after Imparlance for that doth notstand with c. 35 H. 6. fol 37. Trespasse against J.S. of D. after Imparlance he demands Judgment of the Writ for day of the Writ purchased he was dwelling at S. and not at D. and shall not have it for it is contrary to the name which the hath affirmed by the Imparlance 32 H. 6. fol 35. After Imparlance the Defendant cannot plead that he is dwelling in another place then is in the Count 19 H. 6. fol 1. 35 H. 6. fol 43. Debt against J. S. as Executor of J. D. and he imparles he shall not say after that he is Administrator and nor Executor 32 H. 6. fol 32. The same 36 H. 6. fol 17. 37 H. 6. fol 32. If the Defendant in personall action imparle and at the day makes default Judgment shall be given and in a reall action shall be awarded a Pettie Cape 7 H 6. fol 30. The same 11 H 7 fol 5.38 H. 6. fol 36.39 H. 6. fol 17. 4 H. 7. fol 12. If a man in debt upon an Obligation imparle before he demands hearing of the Obligation and Condition and hath that entred he cannot plead the Condition afterward for he shall not have hearing of that if he do not alledge variance 13 H. 7. fol 17. Precipe of Lands in D. the Tenant imparles and at the day he may say no such Town 9 Ed 4. fol 33. the same 7 Ed 4. fol 1. Trespas 16 H. 7. fol 17. Debt by Prior the Defendant imparles and at the day saith that the Plaintiffe is deposed for that goes in Bar. 7 Ed. 4. fol 1. Trespas against J.S. de D. in the County of Middlesex after Imparlance the Defendant cannot say no such Town D. within the said County but he may say there is over D. and nether D and none without addition 22 Ed 4. fol 1. the same 9 Ed. 4. fol 38. Precipe after Imparlance one may plead Non-tenure and Joyntenancie But in Precipe of Lands in D. and S. the Tenant Imparles and at the day saith That D. is an Hamlet of S. without that that there is any Town or place known out of the Town named D. in the same County Judgment of the Writ and hath the Plea by the whole Court 9 Ed. 4. fol. 42. Debt against Executors after Imparlance he cannot say that the Testator dyes intestate and that the Administration was committed to him Judgment of the Writ for he is estopped by the Imparlance but he may plead never Executor nor ever administred as an Executor for that is with the c. 32 H. 6. fol. 32. the same 18 Ed. 4. fol. 19. Writ is abated by death and abateable by Joyntenancie and severall tenancie and where a man is made knight or a woman takes an husband and such like and saith where a Writ is abateable if he Imparle or take continuance he cannot plead in abatement But otherwise it is if it were abated See 7 H. 6. fol. 16. and 20 H. 6. fo 17. And note that it pleaded there that the Plaintiffe is a knight 44 Ed. 3. fol. 4. After Imparlance the Defendant may plead to the Action as to say that the Plaintiffe is a Channon professed c. But he cannot plead to the Writ unlesse he come after the Continuance unlesse it were for that that the Writ is abated as death c. 20 Ed. 4. fol. 9. Debt upon a Lease of a Corodie the Defendant imparles and after that shall not have hearing of the Deed. See 4 H. 7. fol 12. 4 H 7. fol. 17. Replegeare against three which imparle joyntly and one makes default the other cannot plead no such in being as one is which makes default 11 H. 7. fol. 5. Debt for Corn the Defendant imparles and at the day makes default there shall go a Writ to inquire of the value See 37 H. 6. fol. 32. 15 H. 7. fol. 14. Attorney for Corporation after Imparlance he cannot plead that they are corporate by another name 32 H. 6. fol 12. Where a Writ is abated he may plead that though there be a Continuance as to say that the Plaintiffe is dead or hath an Husband day of the Writ but if it be abateable it is otherwise he may say that after the last continuance is made knight Judgment of the Writ c. where it is abateable 34 H. 6. fol 49. Debt upon Obligation by three the Defendant pleads not his Deed yet he may plead that after the last continuance one Plaintiffe is dead 22 Ed 4. fol 36. Trespasse The Defendant after Imparlance may say that the Plaintiffe is his wife Judgment if Action or that the Plaintiffe is a Monk professed And in Mordancester that the Demandant is a Bastard And in Debt against Executors after Imparlance he may say he was never Executor nor ever administred as Executor for these are disabilities which go in Bar. 32 H. 6. fol 32. It seems a man may plead after a Continuance that the Plaintiffe is a stranger born or Monk professed Judgment if Action and not to the person 36 H. 6. fol 7. 7 H. 6. fol. 39. It seems that after Imparlance one cannot plead to the Jurisdiction unlesse it be after speciall Imparlance saving all advantages as well to the Jurisdiction of the Courts as to the Writ and Declaration 19 H. 6. fol. 7. Debt by Executor which shews the Will as it behoveth and after the Defendant imparles there he shall not have reading of the Will again 38 H. 6. fol. 2. But if he plead variance he shall have Reading and so in Debt upon Obligation 16 Ed. 4. fol. 4. Debt upon specialtie the Defendant may plead Out-lawrie in the Plaintiffe though he hath parled for that is a Bar and intitles the King 4 Ed. 4. fol. 15. Debt after Imparlance one space in the Count cannot be amended in another tearm 39 H. 6. fol. 22. Debt upon arrerages of annuitie after Imparlance the Defendant cannot have hearing of the Deed But if the Defendant plead that it was made in another County then where the Writ was brought and then he shall shew 39 H. 6. fol. 17. the same Pleas after day given IF the Defendant imparle and make default he shall be condemned and upon day given shall issue Processe 7 H. 6. fol. 42. 19 H. 8. fol. 6. Note by all the Prothonotaries that day given is ever before the Count and Imparlance is after the Count and therefore where three Capias and Exigent is awarded and the Defendant appear upon the Exigent and hath day given and after makes default Distringas shall go and upon that returned Nihil other 3 Capias and Exigent and upon default in persâ—r all action he shall be condemned See 7 H. 6. fol 42. 20 H. 6. fol 17. Trespas the Defendant at the day which he hath by
If Sommons in Precipe be not served fifteen days before the first day of the return of the Writ the Tenant may wage his Law of not sommoned 42 Ed. 3. fol. 7. Precipe at the great Cape returned the Tenant tenders his Law of not sommoned and at the day comes to wage his Law And the Demandant offers to waive the default and prays that the Tenant may plead in cheif But cannot if the Tenant will not assent by which he made his Law and the Demandant takes nothing by his Writ But at the first day that the Tenant offered his Law the Demandant might have released the default 27 H. 8. fol. 17. the same 2 H. 5. fol 1. Formedon at the great Cape returned the Demandant is essoined and for that the Tenant need not wage his Law for the default is saved 18 H. 6. fol 6.3 H. 6. fol. 50. the same 8 Ed 4. fol 2 Precipe If the Demandant be essoined the day that the Tenant tenders his Law the default is saved he need not wage his Law of not summoned But if it be at the day that he hath waged his Law it is otherwise for he cannot release the default 33 H. 6. fol. 49. the same 7 Ed. 3. tit 51. Saving default Fitzh at the Petty Cape returned the Demandant was essoined and had day over at which day he took him to the default and the Tenant was put to answer at the default notwithstanding the said Essoine 5 Book of Ass 11. the same 4 Ed. 3. tit 62. F. At the great Cape returned the Demandant was essoined and day given over at which day the Demandant took him at default by which it was awarded that he take nothing by his Writ 3 H. 6. fol. 48. Precipe at the great Cape returned the Defendant saith that he was imprisoned by J. S. upon a Statute Merchant by vertue of a Statute acknowledged to him that he could not come and notwithstanding that this was his own act that is to say the acknowledging the Statute and not paying it yet the Imprisonment was by the act of the Law and his default and by that Plea his default was saved The same Law of encrease of water 12 Ed. 4. fol. 44. Saving default F. 42 Ed 3. fol 7. Precipe at the Petty Cape retâ—â—â—ed the Tenant saith that he was in Prison at the time of the default made ready c. And the Demandant to the contrary that he was at large and the Enquest taken sound that he was in prison by which the Demandant took nothing by his Writ 13 Ed. 3. Tit. 49. F. 18 Ed. 3. tit 35. F. At the great Cape returned the Tenant saith that he was in prison c. The demandant saith that he was in prison by his own consent and by fraud to save his default And the Tenant was driven to aver that he was in prison against his will and upon this Issue taken 14 Ed 3 tit 39. F. 13 Ed 3. tit 49. At the petty Cape returned the Tenant saith that he was in prison upon a Statute c. and the demandant saith that that was by covin and so Issue taken that he was in prison against his will taken and others to the contrary 39 H. 6. fol 17. The Attorney may save the default where his Master came and for that both may save the default by encrease of water and by Imprisonment and not by weakness neither of the one nor of the other for that cannot be tryed if he may come without unavoidable perill of death or not 38 H 6. fol 12. Weaknesse of an Attorney is not sufficient to save a default but encrease of water and Imprisonment is a cause See 50 Ed. 3. fol. 9. And the Tenant plead in abatement matter for mischeif of war and death which proves the Writ abated without saving his default 40 Ed 3. fol. 2. Precipe against H. son of W. Osmond the Tenant at the great Cape comes without saving his default and saith that his Father is named Edmond and not Osmond and for mischeif of the war he shall have that plea before default saved by waging of Law 40 Ed. 3. fol. 42. Formedon at the day of the Petty Cape the Tenant cometh and saith that the Demandant hath entred hanging the Writ and cannot have that Plea in abatement before the default saved 40 Ed. 3. fol. 18. Precipe against the Husband and Isabel his wife they come before the default saved that the wife is named Elizabeth and had for the mischeif of the war 14 H 4. tit 15. Precipe the Tenant saith that the Demandant is out-lawed and shall not have this before default saved 38 Ed. 3. tit 17. At the great Cape against three they alledge severall Teâ—ancie and the Writ abate if he do not maintain And they shall not wage the Law of not summoned for then they admit the Writ and that they are Tenants as the Writ supposeth 12 Ed. 4. fol. 1. 14 H. 6. f. 4. Precipe at the great Cape the Tenant would plead Joyntenancy and could not before his default saved for this comes upon the view 42 Ed. 3. fol. 11. the same 21 Ed. 4. fol. 19. Precipe against two at the great Cape one Tenant pleads that the other is dead after the day of the default and for that this Plea proves the Writ abated he shall have this Plea before his default saved 20 H. 6. fol. 2. the same 42 Ed 3. fol 3. Precipe against two one Tenant may plead that in the conclusion of the Writ the one is left out and the Writ for that is abated before the default saved Pleas after Continuance and Imparlance and what not ASsise where they are adjourned upon Plea in Bar it seems that he shall not have but one Plea after the last continuance for otherwise he may delay the party Infinitely 28 H. 6. fol 1.9 H. 7. fol 9.9 H. 6. fol 22. Quare impedit cleerly agreed that a man shall have but one Plea after the last continuance upon matter in Deed And by some the same Law is where it is by matter of Record 1 Ed 4. fol 3. Ass It seems that one cannot have divers Pleas after the last Continuance 2 H. 6. fol 13. Entrie in the Post If the Demandant enter and after there is a Continuance yet he may plead that for that that it is abated And it is folly of the Demandant to abate his own Writ 7 H. 6. fol 15. The same 7 H. 6. f 16. Quare Impedit It was pleaded in abatement Plaintiffe was made knight after the last continuance Judgment of the Writ and he had it 20 H. 6. fol 17. Trespasse after Imparlance the Defendant saith that the Plaintiffe was made knight day of the Writ not named knight Judgement of the Writ and had that Plea 35 H. 6. fol 5. Where a man is sued by the name of J. Prior of the Church of St. Peter of D. and imparles by an Attorney he shall not
Affraies and blood-shed but not if one hath broken my Close or if one hath beaten me but if any Affray were so that the Kings People were disturbed for that is more then particuler 1 R. 3 fol. 1. If one come to make a Boothe and doth it not and yet one maketh a Fray upon him and upon him draw blood with his Sword or Dagger it is punishable by presentment in Leet 11 H. 6. fol. 29. If one assault to beat you and you fly and he inclose you or if you be at Hedge or Ditch and then you beat him and wound him this is not punishable in a Leet 34 H. 6. fol. 8. and 33. H. 6. fol. 20. If J. S. makes an Assault upon a Stranger and J. D. draws his Sword and beats and wounds J. S. in defence of the Stranger this is punishable by a presentment in a Leet But if a Servant beat and wound one which maketh an assault upon his Master in defence of his Master he is not punishable by presentment in Leet 12 H. 8. fol. 3. and 9 Ed. 4. fol. 51. If one lay his hands unlawfully upon any unlesse that he arrest him or part two that fight he is a trespassor but that is not punishable by presentment in Leet 9 Ed 4. fo 3. If one beat one in defence of his Goods this is not punishable in a presentment in Leet Booke of Entries fol. 553. and 19. H. 6. fol 21. Trespss of Assaults and Fraies TRespass by a Chaplain of Grayes Inne the Defendant pleads of his own Assault and it was held if he upon whom the Assault is made can escape with his life it is not lawfull for him to beate the other which made the Assault but it is held that I ought not to stay till the other hath given me a blow for paradventure he commeth too short 2 H. 4. fol. 9.10 Ed. 4. fol. 7. Trespasse of Grassetrod and threatning of life and member a man cannot justifie the menace of death and for that to that he pleads not guilty 21 H. 6. tit 26. the same 33 H. 6. fol. 20. Trespasse of Threatning by Prisot I cannot threaten one of Life and Member but if he upon whom the Assault is made fly and the other followeth him so neere that he cannot escape or hath him under him upon the Ground or hath chased him to a Wall Hedge Water or Ditch there it is lawfull for him to say if you will not depart that he to save his Life will kill him 3 H. 4. fol. 8 Trespasse of Assault Imprisonment and Battery Defendant plead to the Battery not guilty and to the Assault that the Plantiff came to such a River where the Defendant had a Mill and would have stopt the River and the Defendant took him by the Arme without that that he made other Assault and to the Imprisonment the Defendant pleads that the Plantiff Assaulted him and would have beate him by which he prayed the Constable to arrest him and he came in aid of him judgment if action and good 22 H. 6. fol. 48. Trespasse of a Servant beaten and Entry into his House yeare 7 H. 6. Defendant saith that yeare 8 H. 6. he served a Subpena upon the Plaintiff and that the Plaintiff and the Servant took him and carried him to his House and there deteined him half a day which is the same Trespasse and to any Trespasse before not guilty to the Battety of his Servant which was of his Assault at another day and to any Assault before not guilty Bracton saith he is not worthy of Peace which will not keep it Stamford fol. 30 a. 40 Ed. 3. fol. 40. Trespasse of Assault and Battery and found the Assault only and Plaintiff recover but shall not have action of Assault only 42 Ed 3 fol 7 the same and see 22 Assise 60. 9 Ed 4 fol 30 Trespasse of Battery it was held that if a man will take my goods I may lay my hands upon him and rather beate him then suffer him to carry them away 19 H. 6. fol. 33 the same that he may beat one in defence of his Goods 19 Ed 4 fol 189 Trespasse of Battery a man may Justifie the beating of another in his defence but by Catesby a man cannot beat another in defence of his Son but a Servant may beat one in defence of his Master or Mistris 21 H 7 fol 39. the same Mortmaine Mortmaine is inquirable in a Leet for that it is for the benefit of the King and in the Kings Court What is Mortmaine within the Statute and what not WHere one Abbot aliens to another Abbor or Bishop to another Bishop and his Successor it is Mortmaine Fitzh fol 222 D. 16 Assise 1. VVhere Land is divised to one to pay twelve pound to finde two Chaplaines for ever to sing in the Church of Saint Albanes in Wood street for ever if it be behinde that the Chaplaine may distraine that is Mortmaine see 32 Ed 3 10 and 40. Assise 29. J. S. deviseth certaine Land to his Executors that they should provide a fit Chaplaine in the Church of D. to celebrate for ever which Chaplaine shall receive yearly out of the aforesaid Lands six markes that is no Mortmaine for nothing is divised to the Chaplaine 4 Assise 27.43 Assise 27. Foure Acres were devised to one in Fee so that he and his Heires should pay yearly six pound for the maintaining of one Chaplaine to celebrate yearly for ever in the Church of Saint Leonards in Estcheape and that the Rector for the time may levie it for ever that is Mortmaine 43 Assise 33. J. S. deviseth Land and two shillings Rent for the maintaining of a Chaplaine in the Church of D. yearly to celebrate and I will that my Executors should ordaine the aforesaid Chaplaine and the Executors do nothing therefore no Mortmaine 43 Assise 34. If a Villain of a Bishop purchase Lands in Fee and the Bishop enter without license it is Mortmaine 41 of Assises 4 Fitzh 224 B. 41 Ed. 3. fol 16. If a Feoffment be made to the use of a Bishop and his Successors it is within the Statute De religiosis and so it is where he takes profits 8 Ed 4. fol. 18. A Bishop cannot appropriate an Advowson of which he is seised in Fee without the Kings license and if he doth it is Mortmaine Fitzh 223 H. see 21 Ed. 3. fol 5. seemeth contrary If one let to a religious man for a hundred yeares and so from a hundred to a hundred during eight hundred yeares this is Mortmaine but it seemeth that a lease to a Religious man for eighty years or for a hundred yeares is no Mortmaine but in the first case it is by colour of a Tearme and Mortmaine 29 H 8 Mortmaine 39. Lease for eighty years to an Abbot by Martin is Mortmain Quere 4 H. 6. fol. 9. The Tenant lets for life to J. S. the Remainder to a Religious and his Successors the Lord need
tenant praies the Assise upon the title and upon that the Assise is awarded the Assise cannot finde other title for the Plaintiff but he may finde matter which may stand with the same title to inforce it but if the title be traversed he cannot finde another title but only the point put in the Assise 28 book of Assises 17. An Act of Parliament Fine or Recovery are of such a force that if one be bound by them the Plaintif cannot make title to this Land unlesse by reason of a title to him grown of later times As if one recovers against me or my Ancestor and hath execution and after Lenten and dye seised my Heire shall not make him title by his discent against the Recovery without shewing he hath title after the recovery the same Law of a Fine see 10 H. 7. fol. 5.32 H. 6.5 and 33 book of Assises fol. 19. Pleas in Barr and in Abatement IT seems a feoffment of the Plaintif is no Plea in Barr for that amounts to no wrong nor Desseisin 2 H. 4. fol. 20. the same 15 Ed. 4. fol. 11. 18 Ed. 4. fol. 11. A Lease for yeares or for life the reversion to the Plaintif or a feoffment of the Plaintif with warranty and rely upon the warranty is a good Barâ— Abridgment of Ass fol. 31. The tenant may plead that partition was made between the Plaintif and J. S. whose Estate he hath and it is a good Barr. 30 H. 6. fol. 1. Assise the tenant saith that the Lands put in view and in plaint are in another Town and if it be found no tenant of the Free-hold named in the VVrit c. By the Court he shall not have the second Plea for none may say that the Land is in another town but the tenant and so hath accepted the tenancy by his Plea 30 H. 6. fol. 7. Assise the tenant saith that T. B. was seised and disseised by W. W. to whom T. B. made release and against his own Deed disseised W.W. and infeoffed five persons which infeoffed the Plaintif upon which W. W. re-entred whose Estate the tenant seised hath it is good see Pleas in Barr Tit. Abridg. Ass fol. 30. Abridgement Assise fol. 41. If the Plaintiffe choose one to be his tenant of all where he is not the Writ shall abate Abridgement of Assise fol. 42. A man cannot plead in Assise that there is another hanging to which he hath appeared unless that he take the tenancy upon him and for that it is no Plea for the Disseisor Bridgement Ass 44. Death of one of the tenants shall not abate the Assise but for the portion if he be a Disseâ—sor and tenant of another parcell 27 Ass 45.40 Ass 15. Abridgement Ass fol. 43. Assise of tenements in D. and S. the tenant sayes that all is in S. if that be so the Writ shall abate for he cannot abridge a whole Towne but see now by the Statute of 21 H. 8. chap. 3. where he may abridge Abridgement of Ass fol. 45. Assise of Lands in D. is no Plea if there be two Dales for that the Plaintiff shall recover by the view of the Jury 29 Ass 59. Abridgement of Ass 106. Assise tenant pleads in Barr and after the Jury hath the view he leaves his Barr and pleads to the Assise Plaint in Assise PLaint of profits of an Office though it hath no form it shall not abate as first it ought to suppose disseisin and after shall make title and though it were not so it shall not abate 12 H. 6. fol. 22. Plaint of a Croft is good but Precipe of a Croft is not good Abridgment of Assise fol 130. b. and 8 Hen. 6. fol. 3. Time of Ed. 6. Brook tit False Latine and forme 66. Wood was put before Pasture in a Plaint of Assise and exception thereof taken yet good though it were contrary to the Register by the Commentaries fol. 169. Plaint of a Croft and was amended 14 Ass 13. and 25 Ed. 3. tit 25. the same Brook demand 17.34 Plaint of a peice of Land containing in length twenty feet and in breadth ten and is good 14 Ass 13. and 9 H. 4. fol. 3. the same Plaint by the Governour of an Hospitall it shall be of a House and not of an Hospitall 8 Ass 29 and Assise 137. Plaint of two parts of Salt Coot is good ninth Book Ass 12. Plaint of a Garment or thirty shillings though it be uncertaine for that it is according to the Deed it is good 11 Book of Ass 8. Plaint in Assise of a Garden lyeth but not a Precipe 22 Ed. 3. tit 22. 5 Ed. 2. Brook demand 39. and Fitzh breife 797. Plaint was of a Mill and doth not say a water-Mill nor VVinde-Mill yet good 21 Assise 23. Plaint of a Garment and the specialty is of a Garment with furr and the plaint good for the Garment conteines all 22 Ass 10. Where the Plaintiff may abridge in Assise and in what other Actions he may abridge and how IN a VVrit of ward the VVrit is of the custody of the Land and Heire and is not certain and for that he may abridge as he may in assise and VVrit of Dower 39 Ed. 3. Tit. Breif 10. and 32. In trespasse the VVrit is of Goods and Chattells and hee counts of Corne and ten pounds and for that that Money is not Goods and Chattells he abridged it see 8. Tit. abridgment 11. which saith that he ought to expresse the Money in the VVrit and for that he did not he abridged 39 Ed. 3. Tit. Breife 11. In all cases where the VVrit is of a Free-hold and uncertain he may abridge by June as in assise of Dower and a VVrit of ward 14 H. 6. fol. 4. In ward for that the Demand is not certain but of the custody of the Land and Heire therefore the Plaintif counts of the Mannour of D. and twenty acres and the Defendant saith that the twenty acres are parcell of the Mannor the Plaintif may abridge the twenty acres 39 E. 3 f. 10. Brooks abridgment 10. Assise of Land in great Dunmowe and little D. you cannot abridge all in one Town 8. H. 6. fol. 56. Assise and in Dower he may abridge but he cannot abridge a whole Town 14 H. 6. fol. 4. Assise where a plaint is of a Mannor he cannot abridge for that it is entire 19 H. 6. fol. 13.33 H. 6. Tit. abridgment 2. Assise plaint of Rent and Land after that the Tenant hath pleaded in Barr the Plaintif shall abridge in right of the Land 14 Ass 9. Plaint abridge in attaint Rast Assi 17. 35 H. 6. fol. 13. Assise of Common in forty acres the Plaintif cannot abridge for that that the Common is Intire but at this day it is contrary by the Statute of 31 H. 8. chap. 3.29 Ass 10. Plaintiff in every Assise at his pleasure may abridge and for that also by the Statute may abridge where the plaint is of a Mannor 21 H.
in Discender generally or may have special Writ making mention how it was given for life the remainder to his Father in tayl and one or other is good 44 Ed. 3. fol. 6. In conveyance of Degrees ye need not name him Heir but Son of him which was not seised but it is a surer way to name him Son and Heire to every one if hee were seised or not but he cannot omit any in his VVrit which was seised If the Demandant omit in Formedon one which held the Estate that is to say who was seised the VVrit shall abate otherwise it is in Scire facias 4 Ed. 2. tit 48. Formedon in Discender shal abate for that he omitted one in the VVrit which held an Estate 44 Edw 3. fol. 40. The Demandant in Formedon ought to make his discent by all which held the Estate otherwise the VVrit shall abate 46 Ed. 3. fol. 9. Though the Demandant be made heire to him which dyed in the life of his Father which was not seised yet the Writ shall not abate but is good 48 Ed. 3. fol. 7. Where the Demandant in Formedon in Discender makes mention of any and not of all the VVrit shall abate 49 Ed. 3. fol. 20. Formedon and the Register was shewed by which it was held that he ought to make him Son to every one and Sonne and Heire to him which last held the Estate but if he makes him Son and Heire to every one that is more and good notwithwanding that every one did not hold the Estate 11 H. 6. fol. 25. The Writ is not the worse though in the same it be mentioned that he is the heir of one or that he should have scarce been heir to him if he had lived if he be heir to him that last was seised 11 H. 4. f. 70. The Demandant in Formedon ought to name him Son and Heir to him that was seised But if one survive his father and were not seised he need not name himself heir but son onely but it is a sure way to name him son and heire or cozen and heire to every one Fitzh fol. 212. F. Formedon abate for that he made himself cozen and heir to the Donee where his father was seised after the death of the Donee and no mention was made of him 10 Edw. 3. tit 41. Esplees shall be alleadged in Formedon in reverter in the Donor and in the Donee and in formedon in descender and remainder in the Donee onely Formedon in reverter It behoveth to lay the Esplees in his Count in the Donor and Donee but in formedon in descender and remainder in the Donee onely 50 Ed. 3. fol. 1. Fitzh fol. 220. Formedon in remainder he alleadgeth Esplees in the Tenant for life and not in the Donor and in formedon in reverter in the Donor and Donee 9 H. 6. fol. 53. 11 Ed. 3. tit 31. the same and 18 Ed. 2. tit 20. Formedon in remainder he counts upon the matter without laying the Esplees in the Donor and it is good 27 Ed. 3. tit 36. Of what things Formedon lyeth and of what not Formedon lyeth of Gorse but not of an Advowson Fitzh fol. 217. B. It lies of pasture for 10 beasts and not of common but a Writ called quod permittat Fitzh 212. B. Formedon lyeth of Common in gross Inquire of 15. Ed. 3. Statham fol. 95. It lyes of a Corody that is to say of Rent and certain breads by the opinion of the Court 18 Ed. 3. Statham 10 book of Assise fol. 11. Nuper obiit was maintained of a Corody Ward For that that in the second Article is inquired if Tenant of the Lord dies if his Heir shall be in ward or not and for that let us see where the Lord shall have the Ward of the heir of his Tenant within age which holds of him by Knights service and where not ANd note where the Heir of Lands held by Knights service shall be said in by discent to be in Ward and where not If the father devises his Land held in Knights service to his Son and Heir in fee and dies hie Heir within age he shall be adjudged in by discent and shall be in Ward But if it were devised to his Son and Heir and to the Heires of his body the remainder to another in fee and dies the Son within age he shall not be in Ward for he is in as purchasor 3 H. 6. fol. 47. Where the Heir recovers Land held in Knight-service in formedon in discendor he shall be adjudged in by discent and if he were within age shall be in ward 2 R. 3. fol. 14. and 11 H. 7. fol. 12. Inquire if he recover in Dum non fuit compos mentis See Fitzh fol. 114. If the Heir enter for the condition broken in lands held by Knights service he shall be adjudged in by discent and shall be in ward if he be within age when he enters 11 H. 7. f. 12. 7 H. 4. f. 13. and 6 H. 4. f. the same If the Father and the Son purchase land held by Knights service to them and to the heires of the father and the father dies though the son within age he shall not be said in by discent to be in ward 43 Ed. 3. fol. 36. But by 32 H. 8. ch 1. If they be held of the King by Knights service the King shall haue the ward of them Where two or more hold joyntly lands held of the King by Knights service to them and to the heires of one of them and he which hath the Inheritance dies his heir within age the King shall have the ward of the body of the infant though that the other which hath the Free-hold be alive See the Stat. of Wills 32 H. 8. chap. 1. If an Infant in the life of his Father be made Knight Rastall Wills 23. and his Father dies he shall be in ward but otherwise it is where an Infant in ward is made a Knight there he shall be out of ward 2 Ed. 6. Tit. Ward 42. Magna Charta chap. 3. Where Reversion discends to the Issue within age he shall be in ward but where he hath a remainder by purchase is otherwise and where he in remainder dies his heir within age shall be in ward Stamf. fol. 6. and 7. the same See the Comment 35 H. 8. tit 119. A person twice in ward where a woman was young with child as a man dies seised of land held in Knights service his brother and heir within age the Lord seises the Ward the wife of the Tenant being young with child with a Son and after the wife is delivered the brother is out of Ward But if the Infant die the brother yet within age there the brother shall be in Ward again the same law where a Daughter is in Ward and after the Son is born 28 H. 8. T it Ward 86. If the King hath an Heir in ward which is a woman and she marry to one before
against the Sherif for that that one was outlawed at his Suit and that the Defendant then Sheriff would not return the VVrit to the losse c. 30 Book of Ass 5. VVhere the Bailiff of a Franchise returnes a Pannell to the Sheriff and returnes another Pannell of himself this shall not be outed at the request of the Bailif but they shall have their action of the case against the Sherif 11 H. 6. f. 18. If a Lawyer be retained to looke over evidence and after he discovers that to another person by which c. Action upon the case lies against him contrary if he shew him his evidence and do not retaine him 15 H. 7. f. 14. By Fro VVhere an Attorney appeares for a man without authority and Imparles where he might have pleaded misnaming and by this hath lost the advantage of this Plea Action upon the Case lyes against him for that that he appears without authority 9 Ed. 4. tit 118. B. Where a Guardian pleads falsly for an Infant or vouches one which is not sufficient to render in value to the Infant the Infant shall have aâ— Action of Deceit Action upon the Case against Executors ACtion upon the Case was brought against the Executors of J. D. and Count that J. S. bought things of the Plaintif and J. D. undertook if he payd not at the day he would and counts that he had Assets sufficient to pay all his Debts and Legacies and sufficient to content him and it lyes Note J. D. did not make the bargaine and contract but undertook for J. S. and upon Assumpsit he could not wage his Law 12 H. 8. fol. 12. 27 H. 8. f. 29. Where Tatam was in execution the Defendant saith if he would discharge him out of execution that such a Day he would pay him if Tatam could not the same Law if he saith to a Baker Deliver Tatam so much Bread and if he do not pay you such a Day I will pay you Debt doth not lie against me upon this Promise but an Action upon the Case 27 H. 8. f. 27. It seems if a man be indebted upon a simple Contract leaves Assets and dies the Action upon the Case doth not lie against the Executors for the Testator might have waged his Law but he shall have a Quo minus in the Exchequer 15 Ed. 4. f. 15. Where the Testator may wage his Law as in Debt of Contract made by him and borrowed Debt doth not lie against his Executor Plowd Com. f. 181. Action upon the Case was brought by Richard Norwood against the Executor of Tho Gray and counts that the Testator in consideration of forty shillings to him paid undertook to deliver to the Plaintiff certain Corn at a Certain Day and did not and counts that the Goods and Chattels of the said Tho Gray the Testator at the time of his Death were sufficient to satisfie as well all the Debts which the said Tho Gray did owe to any person or to any persons at the time of his Death as to satisfie the Plaintiff for the said forty shillings and adjudge that this Action lies against the Executors And if an Action upon the Case be brought against Executors upon a simple Contract if the have no Assets but to pay Specialties they may plead that and shall not be charged 4 Ed. 3. chap. 7. is That an Executor shall have Trespasse of Goods carryed away in the life of the Testator or before an Action personal dies with the person 7 H. 4. fol. 8. Executors shall have Eiectione firme by the equity of the Statute 23 H. 8. Tit. 138. Waste if a Termor make waste and makes Executors and dies the Action of waste is gone for it doth not lie against Executors but for waste made by them Action upon the Case for not performing his Promise and Assumpsit and the place and how where it shall be traversed WHere a man makes a promise or an Assumption to doe a thing and doth it not and there is no specialty of that promise he shall have an Action upon the Case and not a Covenant for that it was not by specialty as for a hundred pound paid the Defendant bargained and sold his Land to the Plaintiff and promised to infeoff him and infeoffs another person he shall have Deceit or Action upon the Case 20 H. 6. f. 36. 3 H. 7. f. 14. Action upon the Case and counts that the Defendant for 10. l. took upon him to labor for the Plaintiff to J.S. that J. S. should let the Mannor of D. to him and counts that the Defendant hath taken that to himself the Action lies so if he undertake for 10. l. paid to infeoff him and infeoffs another for this mis-doing an Action of the case lieth 2 H. 7. f. 12. the same 48 Ed. 3. f. 6. Action of the Case lies against him which took upon him to cure the Plaintiff of a Wound and did not and by his negligence the Plaintiff was worse 3 H. 6. f. 37. Action upon the Case and counts that the Defendant took upon him to make a Mill before such a Day and did not but held that he ought to have counted what he should have for it shall be Quid pro quo and otherwise the Action doth not lie 2 H. 4. f. 4. Action upon the Case and counts that the Defendant took upon him to make him a House and it seems it doth not lie I conceive that was for that he doth not count what he should have for doing it 11 H. 4. fol. 31. 14 H. 6. fol. 19. Action upon the Case where one had bargained to him certain Land for a certain summ and undertook that a stranger released unto him Where a Carpenter covenants to make to me a House or a Chyrurgeon takes upon him to cure me of my Hurts and they do not for this not doing it seems an Action upon the Case lies 21 H. 6. f. 63. If one for ten Markes bargaine with the Plaintif for two Pipes of Wine and undertake to deliver them at D. and did not an Action upon the case lies though that sounds in Covenant for that there is no specialty and the same Law is of all other bargaines and by Paston bargained sold or bought It is no diversity to one or the other 19 H. 6. f. 49. Action upon the case that the Defendant assumed upon him to cure his Horse of a certain Disease and that be negligently and carelesly applied Medicines that the Horse dyed and it lies 26 H. 8. Tit. 133. Action upon the Case that the Plaintiff delivered Goods to the Defendant and the Defendant for ten shillings undertook to keep them safe and did not to the losse c. The Defendant saith that he had them not by the Delivery of the Plaintiff good by Fitzh and Shelley 34 H. 8. Tit. 107. Action upon the Case in London and counts that he was Possessor of Wine and Stuff and showed that certain in
Imparlance saith that the Plaintiffe was knight day of the Writ purchased not named knight Judgment of the Writ and had plea by Judgment Otherwise it is said after continuance by day given 42 Ed 3. fol 1. Debt the Defendant came at the Exigent by Reddidit se and was bayled and the Plaintiffe came and prayed day by Prece partium and had it notwithstanding that the Defendant was by Bayl for that is by agreement of the parties 8 H. 5. fol 8. After day given and after speciall Imparlance the Defendant may plead in abatement and not after generall Imparlance 14 H. 4. fol 14. If the parties be at Issue and the Demandant releases to the Tenant and he takes continuance by request of the parties he shall not plead the release 22 Ed 3. fol 8. The Tenant after the request of the parties was received to plead Joyntenancie by Fine Pleas after Issue and at the Nisi prius day in Bench and after Verdict DOwer by Thorpe the day of the Nisi prius and the day in Bench is not all one to all respects for a Writ purchased mean between the Nisi prius and day in Bench shall abate for the first Writ is hanging till Judgment be given notwithstanding the Plaintiffe was non-suited at the Nisi prius But when to plead any Pleas which come mean between them there shall be one same day 40 Ed 3. fol 38. 28 H. 6. fol 1. A man may plead a Plea after last continuance at the Nisi prius Inquire what Pleas. 34 H. 6. fol 45. At the day of the Nisi prius the Defennant pleads to the Writ that one of the Plaintiffes was dead after the last continuance at D. in the County of Darby Judgment of the Writ and had it 47 Ed 3. fol 2. If it be found against the Plaintiffe at the Nisi prius and the Plaintiffe makes default at the day in Bench yet Judgment shall be upon the Verdict for that is all one day and the day of the Nisi prius 10 H. 7. fol 21. Debt upon a Lease for yeers and the Issue was levyed by distresse or not And now at the Nisi prius he could not plead a Release made after the last continuance 19 H. 6. fol 36. Forging of false Deeds against many they were at Issue Processe continued against the Enquest till the Jury appeared at which day the Defendant pleads arbitrement after the last continuance and upon this the Jury was discharged 21 H. 6. fol. 10. Nisi prius was returned Octa Mich that is the day in Bench and one Plaintiffe dyed after Octa Mich and before Judgment given upon the Verdict And the Defendant may plead that for Judgment shall have relation to Octa Mich and then the Defendant cannot have remedie by Writ of Error Audita querela nor otherwise therefore he shall have the Plea again But it seems that the Defendant cannot plead Release made to him by the Plaintiffe after Verdict for he shall have an Audita querela contrary of his death the day of Nisi prius and the day in Bench were all one self same day and no mean time and therefore Release made mean between these two cannot be pleaded at the day in Bench notwithstanding it seems at the day of Nisi prius before the Jury taken The Release which is made mean between the Award of the Writ of Nisi prius and the day of the Nisi prius may be pleaded at the Nisi prius See 10 H. 6. tit 53 and tit 55. Br. 22 H. 6. fol 1. Dower It seems if the Plaintiffe release to the Defendant mean between the award of the Nisi prius and the day of the Nisi prius there if the Jury remain for default of Jurors the Defendant may plead this Release at the day in Bench after the last continuance though he did not offer it at the day of Nisi prius and contrary it seems if the Jury had been ready at the Nisi prius 36 H. 6. fol 24. At the Nisi prius the Enquest past for the Plaintiffe and he released before the day in Bench the Defendant shall have an Audita querela and of this it follows that the Defendant cannot plead that at the day in Bench after the last Continuance 34 H. 6. fol 3. 21 H. 7. fol 33. After the Enquest taken by default the Defendant cometh before Judgment and pleads that he and the Plaintiffe have put themselves to Arbitrement after the last Continuance c. And by the opinion of the Court he hath no day in Court to plead that Plea And it was said that he shall plead no plea in such case but as a freind to the Court But of matter apparent he shall be received but in the Kings case he shall have that by plea for he hath no other remedie But in the case between common persons he shall have Audita querela contrary against the King 11 H. 7. fol 10. tit B. 61. 38 H. 6. fol 33. Debt by Moyle the Defendant after that he was at Issue might once plead plea after the last Continuance as release or such like notwithstanding no oftner then once 41 Book of Ass 19. If Verdict passe for the Plaintiffe and the Defendant get a release before Judgment yet he cannot plead that 21 Ed 4. fol 52. Adjudge that the Defendant cannot plead Release made mean between the Nisi prius and the day in Bench. 16 Ed 4. fol 5. A man may plead a Plea after the last Continuance after Issue joyned and in another Tearm And therfore it seems that the parties have day in Court as well after Issue joyned till Verdict as before 50 Ed 3. fol 4. Imparlance at a day in the same Tearm and at a day and Tearm between and Imparlance of the Plaintiffe COntinuance by Capias ought to be made from Tearm to Tearm and cannot have other Tearm between for that that the party shall not stay so long in prison but continuance by distresse may be made by a Tearm between as from Michaelmasse Tearm to Easter 8 Ed 4. fol. 13. 12 H. 7. fol Common recoveries for assurance the Tenant tenders Issue the Demandant may Imparle to a day in the same Tearm 44 Ed 3. fol 16. If a man Imparle to another day in the same Tearm or till the next day yet that is a new day at which the parties are demandable 37 H. 6. fol 27. Debt Defendant pleads misnaming of himself and the Plaintiffe Imparles and had it 22 Ed. 4. fol. 19. Where the Defendant in appeal of Robbery by which he put his life in jeopardie the Plaintiffe shall not Imparle to that and therefore ruled that he should answer the Court sitting What Pleas he shall have after the last Continuance WHere the parties and Jury appear at the fourth day in the Common Bench and are adjourned at another day a man may plead a Plea after the last Continuance 28 H. 6. fol. 1. 8 Ed. 4. fol. 9. Where
a man pleads death of the Defenfendant hanging the Writ he shall not plead that after the last Continuance for that by this the Writ is abated in deed contrary of a Plea which proves the Writ abateable 34. H. 6. fol 49. At the day of Nisi prius the Defendant pleads to the Writ that one of the Plaintiffes was dead after the last continuance at D. in the County of Darby Judgment of the Writ and the Plea recorded and the matter adjourned and had that Plea 14 H. 6. fol 9. 38. Ed 3. fol 5. Precipe by a Woman the Tenant tenders his Law of not summoned and at the day was essoyned and at the day saith that the Demandant took a Husband after the Law tendered and for that that he did not say after the last continuance that is after the essoyn it was held no Plea 4. H. 7. fol 8. A man shall have but one Plea after the last continuance 38. H 6. fol 33. the same 16 Ed 4. fol 5. A man may plead a Plea after the last continuance after Issue joyned and in another Tearm till Verdict but not mean between Nisi prius and the day in Bench. â— H. 7. fol 8. A man shall not have a Plea after the last continuance unlesse such Pleas which were not in being at the time of the first Plea for otherwise it is not after the last continuance Maintenance In so much that Maintenance may be the better avoided let us see what maintenance is forbidden by the Law THat no Clark of a Justice or Sheriffe shall not maintain parties in quarrels nor in businesses which are in the Kings Court West 2. chap 28. That none of the Kings Counsellors nor none of his house nor none of his other servants nor no great ones of the Land by sending of their Letters nor in other manner nor no other of the Realm shall not undertake to maintain quarrels nor parties in the Country in disturbance of the Common Law 1 Ed 3. chap 14. See 20 Ed 3. chap 3. That no Counsellor Officer or Servant nor any other persons shall not uphold or maintain any quarrels by maintenance in the Country nor elsewhere first of R. 2. chap 4. That henceforth none buy or sell or take promise grant or Covenant to have Mannors Lands Tenements or hereditaments But if such person which sells their Heirs or they by whom they claim have been in possession of the same or of the reversion or remainder of that or hath taken Rents or profits of that by the space of one whole year next before that bargain Covenant Grant or promise made upon pain of him that bargains to forfeit the value of the Lands And the Buyer also knowing that to forfeit also the value of the Land the one half to the King the other to him which will sue for the same within one year after the same offence And it is also Enacted that none from henceforth unlawfully maintain or cause or procure any unlawfull maintenance in any action or complaint in any of the Courts of the King of the Chancery Starr-Chamber White-Hall or otherwhere within the Kings Dominions where they have power to hold Plea of Land by Commission Patent or Writ And also that none shall instruct Jurors or subborn Witnesses by Letters Promises or by any other sinister labour or means to maintain any matter or cause or to hinder Justice or to procure or occasion any manner of perjury upon pain of forfeiture for every such offence 10 l. one half to the King and the other to him that will sue for the same within one year after the same offence 32. H. 8. chap 9. If one will say he will maintain and doth it not he shall not be punished for maintenance And Champerty lies where one purchases hanging the Suit 9. H. 7. fol 18. See 3 H. 6. fol 53. It seems it is no maintenance to give money before a Suit begins but hanging the Suit Maintenance the Writ was in Plea which was hanging he maintains and it is good and it seems it is better to say in Plea which was hanging 10. H. 7. f. 27. It seems one may covenant to have part of an Obligation when it is recovered for travelling with an Alien which cannot speak English nor Latine to his Counsell so one may covenant with one indebted to him and deliver him the Obligation of another in satisfaction of his Debt to sue in his name and notwithstanding that he paid Counsell it is no Champerty Every Champerty implies in it Maintenance but not of the contrary and he to whose use and every one that hath lawfull Interest in the Land may maintain 15 H. 7. f. 2.34 H. 6. fol. 33. the same By Fineux If a Servant be arrested for Debt or other thing in London or other Franchise the Master may maintain him and spend of his proper money for losse of his Service Inquire But otherwise it is in Precipe 21 H. 7. fol. 40. B. See 21 H. 6. fol. 19. by Newton By Newton and Paston Servant may pray one skilled in the Law to be of Counsell with his Master but a stranger cannot pray one to be of Counsell with my Adversary for he hath nothing to do 21 H. 6. fol. 19. If a man be at the Barre and another informs the Court that this man can declare the truth and pray that he be sworn and by the commandement of the Court he swears this is Maintenance iustifiable but if he had said for one or the other of his own head this is Maintenance punishable the same Law if he informe a Jury sworn of his own head it is Maintenance punishable 28 H. 6. f. 6. The Master may pray one skilled in the Law to be Counsell with his Servant and this is Maintenance iustifiable but he cannot give of his own proper goods to distribute to men of the Countrey for maintaining his quarrell for then he meddles with a thing forbidden by the Law and by Prisot he may iustifie giving money to Lawyers to be of Counsell with his Servant but not to give money to others not learned in the Law 28. H. 6. fol. 12. By Fortescue Master may pray one learned in Law to be of Counsell with his Servant but not to give to them money unless it be of his Wages and he saith one skilled in the Law may be of Counsell without a Fee Inquire 31. H. 6. f. 2.36 H. 6. fol. 29.3 H. 6. f. 55. Maintenance one may iustifie for that he is his Servant but he cannot give money Maintenance Defendant iustifies that he is a Bail and that he came to the Defendants Attorney and prayed him to be carefull the which is the same Maintetenance by Prisoâ— it is not good to say it is the same maintenance for this is no Maintenance for every stranger may pray the Attorney for it is the part of an Attorny to attend to that and for that it is no Maintenance 32 H. 6. f.
and this was the Counterplea to out him of the View 5 H. 5. fol. 4.9 H. 4. f. 9. 44 Ed. 3. fol. 31. Dower of Rent for that that the Husband was seised of Land he was outed of the View by statute 21 Ed. 4. fol. 26. Dower where the Husband dies seised and in Assise where Jurors have the View and where the Tenant takes knowledge of the Land in Demand as in action against two One saith that he is Tenant of all in these Cases he shall have no View 33 H. 6. f. 57. Dower of Lands in diverse Townes and to parcell the Tenant pleads Barre and demands the View in one Town and shall not have it for that that he hath notice of parcell 9 H. 6. f. 65. Wast if six of the Jurors have not the View the Inquest shall not be taken 9 Ed. 4. fol. 1. In Waste and Assise the Jury shall have the View 21 Ed. 4. f. 26. 3 H. 4. f. 16. In Attaint upon verdict of Assise the Jurors shall not have View for in this Writ it is not let them see the Land and yet in Assise and Certificate in Assise the Jurors shall have the View 7 Ed. 4 f. 1. 22 H. 6. fol. 27. Entrie in two Acres and the Tenant pleads in Barr to one and demands the View of the other and shall not have it for he hath taken notice of parcell and intended of all 2 H. 4. f. 26. 7 H. 4. f. 9. Defendant shall not have View in an Action upon the Case for that that it is personall 7 H. 4. f. 32. the same 46 Ed. 3. fol. 27.29 Ed. 3. fol. 43. the same 3 H. 6. fol. 34. The statute is for ill naming the Town by non-tenure and such like if the Writ abate after the View he shall not have the View in the second Writ and yet said that if the first Writ abate for false Latine that he shall not have View in the second Writ but where the first Writ abates for form as where the name of the Wife was put in the Writ before the name of the Husband he shall have View in the second Writ for that vests the fault in the Partie 10 H. 4. fol. 6. Precipe The Tenant hath View in the second Writ where the first was discontinued after the View 12 H. 4. fol. 4. Precepe against two where one dies after the View and the Writ abates yet in the second Writ against him which is alive he shall have View 12 H. 4. fol. 11. Where the first Writ abates for false Latine and by Thirne hath the View in the second Writ Seek 13 H. 4. fol. 8. He hath the View in the second Writ where the first was abated by excepion of the Tenant 13 H. 4. f. 14 The Tenant hath the View in the second of VVrit of 6 Acres where he had the View in the first Writ of 6 Acres abate 42 Ed. 3. fol. 23. Precipe where after the View the first VVrit abates by death and in the new by miscounts he shall not have View 43 Ed. 3. fol. 35. 42 Ed. 3. f. 33. Precipe abates by false Latine and in a new by miscounts he shall not have the View 7 H. 6. f. 36. the same 46 Ed. 3. fol. 16. In a VVrit of Besayle he shall not have the View where he had View before in a VVrit of Cozenage which was misconceived before of the same Land and for that abates 46 Ed. 3. fol. 34. In a dum fuit infra Aetatem the Tenant shall not have the View where a dismission was made to the Tenant by his Ancestor 48 Ed. 3. fol. 31. In a dum fuit infra Aetatem the Tenant shall not have the View for he is out by the statute 29 Ed. 3. fol. 39. In dum fuit infra Aetatem in the per and cui the Tenant shall have the View otherwise where it is in the per onely for he is there outed by the statute 22. Ed. 3. fol. 9. Precipe The tenant hath the View and after the Demandant was non-suited and after brought another VVrit and the tenant demands another time the View and had it 24 Ed. 3. fol. 48 Precipe the tenant abated that by waging of Law of not summoned and yet in another brought freshly he shall have the View but he had not that in the first 38 Ed. 3. fol. 1. Precipe Against Husband and Wife they have the View and the Husband dies and in a new Writ freshly brought the Wife demanded the View and was outed for it is not necessary 29 Ed. 3. fol. 22. 38 Ed. 3. fol. 41. VVhere the first VVrit abates by no such Town where he had the View and yet in the second VVrit he shall have the View 30 H. 7. f. 8. Cui in vita the first VVrit abates after the View for that he did not shew of whose Demise he claimed in the second VVrit he was outed by Fineux and Davers and by Vavisor said he shall have the View in the second if the first were not abated for any cause which comes upon the View unlesse it were by death abated 41 Ed. 3. fol. 8. Quod ei deforceat The Defendant shall not have View for he is outed by the statute 41 Ed. 3. fol. 30. the same 44 Ed. 3. fol. 42. the same 41 Ed. 3. fol. 8. Quod ei deforceat The Defendant shall not have the View for he is outed by the statute 41 Ed. 3. fol. 30. the same 44 Ed. 3. fol. 42. the same 41 Ed. 3. f. 22. Assise of Nusance the Defendant shall have the View 46 Ed. 3. f. 27. Curia claudenda the Tenant shall have the View 48 Ed. 3. f. 4. Gessavit the Tenant shall have the View where it is of his own ceasing where he is Tenant of the Land and not Tenant to the Lord for he is as a stranger 2 H. 4. fol. 6. Cessavit of the Seisin of his Father and of his own ceasing he shall not have View for that it is of his own wrong 7 H. 4. f. 16. the same 2 H. 4. f. 14. 37 H. 6. fol. 28. Cessavit where it is of his own ceasing he shall not have the View 4 H. 6. fol. 29. the same 7 H. 6. fol. 47. Entry upon disseisin of Rent the Tenant hath View of the Land out of which the Rent is issuing 8 H. 6. fol. 66. the same 35 H. 6. fol. 70. Entry in the quibus of a Mannour said that the Tenant shall not have the View for he is in by wrong 28 H. 6. fol 1. the same 3 H. 4. fol. 16. Assise Jurors have the View but the Tenant shall not have the View 6 Ed. 4. fol. 1. Quod permittat the Tenant shall have the View though it be in Debet solet which is of possession and not of Right 30 Ed. 3. fol. 4. 2 H. 4. fol. 14. Quod permittat of turning water View was demanded in this VVrit and he had it 8 H. 6. f.
iustifie by command of him to whose use he ought to say that at the time of the commandement they were seised to the use c. the same Law if one plead a Lease and Release he ought to say that he was possessed at the time of the Release made 10 H. 7. f. 26. 7 H. 7 f. 3. the same That which is Issuable ought to be pleaded certainly ONe avows for that that the Plaintiffe held of him by a Knights Fee and this is not good for that he doth not shew by what Knights Fee 12 H. 8. fol. 13. 3 H. 7. f. 2. One traverses the Office found after the death of the Lord Greystock the Kings Tenant which was found that he died seised and he said that the Dean of York recovered against the Lord G. in a Writ of Right long before the finding of the Office and it may be he recovered against him long before the finding the office and it might be after the death of the Lord Greystock and for that it is not good for it is uncertain So if one plead that he entred for that that his Tenant aliened in Mortmain he ought to shew that he entered within the year otherwise it is not good 26 H. 8. fol. 2. Debt upon Obligation indorsed with condition if he make an Estate as it shall be devised by the Plaintiffe Defendant saith that he hath made an Estate and it is not good without shewing what Estate 1 H. 7. fol. 13. One comes to reverse an Outlawry of Felonie and pleads that he was in the Castle of Oxford at the time of the Outlawry published and for that he doth not shew in what County the Castle is nor under whose custody it is uncertain and not good for these are Issuable 2 H. 7. f. 6. Dower against the Heire he saith that he was ready to render Dower if she would deliver to him the Writings concerning his Land and for that he doth not shew what Writings incertain it is nor good for it is Issuable Affirmative and Negative Issue shall be upon the Affirmative and Negative and it shall not be answered by Argument DEbt against the Administrators of J.S. Defendant saith that J. S. made him Executor Judgement of the VVrit he shall say without that that he died intestate for this is alledged by the Plaintiffe 9 H. 6. fol. 7. 11 H. 4. fol. 88 Trespasse of taking six beasts the Defendant iustifies the taking of them by agreement the Plaintiffe saith they were other six and ought to traverse without that that he took those six in the Negative 11 H. 6. f. 1. VVrit upon the Statute of Labourers and counts that the Defendant was a Vagrant and he required him to serve and he refused Defendant saith that he was in the Service of J. S. and shall say without that that he was a Vagrant 1 H. 6. f. 15. Formedon in Reverter and counts of a gift in Tail the Defendant saith that the Donor gave in Fee and it is not good but he shall say without that that he gave in Tail 10 H. 6. f. 7. Account for the Heire against a VVoman Guardian in Socage Defendant saith that the father of the Insant held of her in Knights Service and died and Defendant seised him and he ought to say without that that he held by Knights Service 14 H. 8. fol. 4. The Avowant saith that W. the tenth day of February year twenty five granted his Interest to him and avowed doing damage Plaintiffe saith that W. the first day of Feb. year twenty five granted his Interest to him and he put in his beasts without that that he granted that to the Avowant before he granted that to him and good 38 H. 6. f. 17. Action upon the Case of that that he hath Leet and Fines and Amerciaments of the same Defendant saith true it is that the Plaintiffe hath Leet but that he the Defendant hath Fines and Amerciaments he ought to say without that that the Plaintiffe hath the Fâ—nes and Amerciaments 18 H. 6. f. 8. Debt upon an Obligation dated the twentieth of Aprill and first delivered the second of May the Defendant pleads Release the last day of April and that the Obligation was delivered when it bore date and for that that he hath not traversed in the Negative that is to say without that that it was first delivered the second day of May it is not good 32 H. 6. f. 4. Debt and Counts of a Lease of a House rendering twenty shillings Defendant saith that he let the House and four Acres rendering twenty shillings and ought to traverse otherwise it is but an Answer by Argument 32 H. 8. f. 8. Debt against Executors Defendant saith that the Testator died intestate that the Administration was granted to him he ought to say without that that he is Executor or administred as Executor 1 H. 7. f. 13. Debt upon a simple Contract Defendant saith it was upon Condition and shall say without that that he sold in manner and form 4 H. 7. f. 9. Partition Defendant saith that he was onely seised and shall say without that that he held as undivided 6 H. 7. f. 5. 4 H. 6. fol. 4. Debt against J. S. of D. Defendant saith that he is dwelling at S. and shall say and not at D. 19 H. 6. f. 1. the same 7 Ed. 4. f. 16. Scire facias against a Parson for Arrerages of an Annuity Defendant saith that before the Writ purchased he resigned to the Bishop of L. and so that remaines in his hands Judgement of the Writ and it is no Plea for it is but an Answer by Argument and for that he shall say without that that he was Parson day of the Writ purchased or afterwards 11 Ed. 4. fol. 4. Action upon the Statute of Rich. by J. Freestone Defendant saith that the Master of the Colledge of Maidstone and his fellow-brethren let c. Plaintiff saith at the time of the making of the Lease there were not any fellow-brethren of the said Colledge and this is but an Argument and for that he shall say without that that the Master and his fellow-brethren let 14 H. 8. f. 29. Issue shall be upon Affirmative and Negative 9 H. 7. fol. 13. Trespasse Defendant justifies for Fealty not made the Plaintiff saith it was not unmade and good in the Negative Material Let us see what things are material in pleading Evidence and Verdict and otherwise and what not ACtion upon the Case in London and counts that he was possessed of Wine and Stuff and shews that certain in such a Ship and the Defendant at London assumed for ten pounds that if the Ship and Goods did not come safe to London and are put upon the Land there that then he shall satisfie one hundred pounds to the Plaintiff and counts that aftewards the Ship was â—obbed upon the Trade in the Sea and for not satisfying Action did accrue and though that the Plaintiff doth not shew where