though it were moved to and fro yet was chiefly heaved up and thereof is called terumah an heave-offering QUEST XXXIII What is here understood by the heave-offering Vers. 28 FOr it is an heave-offering of the children of Israel 1. Some by Terumah which is a speciall name signifying an heave-offering doe understand in generall an oblation Vatarlus But the same word being in the next verse before used in a speciall signification for an heave-offering must bee also so taken here 2. Some doe take it in that speciall sense but then they restraine it only to the shoulder before spoken of which is called the shoulder of the heave-offering Osiander But it is evident in that a perpetuall Law is made for Aaron and his sonnes what part they should have of the peace-offerings and they had as well the shaken breast as the shoulder that was lifted up Levit. 27.34 that this clause must be understood of both those parts before spoken of the breast and the shoulder 3. Some by the heaving here understand only the dividing and separating of these parts which was to be made by the children of Israel So Oleaster and in the same sense the Latine Interpreter translateth primitivae sunt they are the first things that is the principall or best of the offerings of the children of Israel But the word terumah being before used in that speciall signification for an heave-offering should bee also so taken here 4. Therefore this terme terumah heave-offering is given both to the shaken breast and heaved shoulder of the more principall motion for these gifts were first of all by the Priest lifted up and presented before God in the hands of the Priest and in that respect were called an heave-offering Borrh. QUEST XXXIV Of the mysticall application of the shaking to and fro and of the breast and shoulder of the ram given unto the Priests FOr the mysticall application of these rites and ceremonies 1. In that part of the sacrifice was shaken to and fro on every side it signified Deum totius terra esse Dominum that God is Lord of the whole earth Oleaster and beside it betokened that Christi vera victimae merita beneficia c. that the merits and benefits of Christ the true sacrifice should by the preaching of the Gospell be spread abroad into all the world Borrh. But the Hebrewes exposition is fond who would have hereby signified that all men from all parts of the world should come to Jerusalem ibi optimâ aurâ fruituros there to have their health and to enjoy an wholesome aire Ex Oleastro For wee see that not by comming to Jerusalem but in departing from the earthly Jerusalem with the carnall rites thereof by preaching of the Gospell the Gentiles have received health and salvation of their soules which is more precious than the health of the body 2. In that part of the sacrifice was given unto the offerers to eat it sheweth that Christ did not only deliver himselfe unto death for us sed etiam in cibum dare c. but also giveth himselfe to be our meat nourishing us unto eternall life as he saith Ioh. 6.54 My flesh is meat indeed my bloud is drinke indeed c. Marbach 3. And in that the breast and shoulder are given unto the Priest it teacheth as Gregorie well saith Vt quod de sacrificio praecipitur sumere hoc de seipso discat authori immolare That what he is commanded to take of the sacrifice he should learne himselfe to offer unto God quod toto pectore oper◠c. that with all their heart and endevour they should watch upon their office Iun. Vt sint tanquam pectus humeri populi c. To be as the breast of the people to provide and take care for their soules and to bee as their shoulders to beare the burthen of their vocation Simler QUEST XXXV Of the consecrating of Aarons successour in his garments Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments c. 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth in the singular the holy garment but it is in the plurall bigdee garments for there was not one garment but many ten in all which were consecrated for the high Priest 2. The Priests which succeeded Aaron were not to use any other garments but those which Aaron was consecrated in as Eleazar put on Aaron priestly vesture when he was consecrated Priest in his fathers place Numb 20. Lyran. 3. And it is added shall be his sonnes after him whereby the use of these garments is not made generall to all the Priests but onely unto them which should succeed in the priesthood Cajetane 4. And this difference may be observed betweene the consecration of Aaron and his successour that Aaron in his consecration was both consecrated himselfe and his garments with him but his successour only was to be consecrated in those garments which needed not to be consecrated againe unlesse the old garments being old new were to be made in their place and then they were to be consecrated as Aarons priestly garments were at the first Tostat. quaest 13. 5. These garments the high Priest at the time of his consecration was to weare seven dayes together he was not afterward tied necessarily to weare them so long together but as his ministery and service required Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXXVI By whom the high Priests succeeding Aaron were consecrated Vers. 29. TO be consecrate therein 1. There were two high Priests consecrated extraordinarily first Aaron who received his consecration from Moses who was no Priest but only for the time executed that office in Aarons consecration secondly Eleazar was consecrated high Priest his father being yet living which was not afterward seene in any other succeeding high Priest for there could not be two high Priests together But Eleazar was consecrated his father yet living because the time of his death was certainly knowne as the Lord had shewed to Moses and immediatly after Eleazars consecration he died Numb 20 but this could not be knowne in any other high Priest 2. The rest of the high Priests which followed after Moses death were consecrated by the inferiour Priests Tistetus giveth an instance how the Pope at this day is consecrated by the Bishop of Hastia But the Gospell acknowledgeth no such high Priesthood and the Pope doth usurpe that place over other Churches therfore it is nothing to us how an usurper entreth A better instance may be given Act. 13.3 where certaine that were but Prophets and Doctors of the Church do yet lay their hands upon the Apostles Saul and Bernabas and so they did consecrate them to the worke whereunto they were called Therefore by the like example the inferiour Priests might consecrate the high Priest in the old Testament there being no other high Priest to do it QUEST XXXVII Whether Eleazar was consecrated after the manner here prescribed Vers. 30. THat sonne that shall be Priest in his stead c. Which is not understood onely
verse the negative particle lo not must be supplyed which is but once in the beginning of the verse expressed This interpretation we preferre before either that of the Hebrewes 1. who referre this verse to that which followeth and joyne it not with that which goeth before but make this sense that as yet there were no plants or herbs that appeared above the earth but lay yet hid till God sent raine whereby the earth was prepared for the creation of man and the plants watered so R. Sel. But this is a vaine conceit for upon the third day trees were made which appeared above the earth and the earth having beene so lately covered with the waters was yet moist enough 2. Either that of Eugubinus who saith it rained the second day and then the plants were brought forth the third for upon the second day the waters were gathered together from covering the earth so that no raine was then needfull 3. Mercerus distinguisheth the times the 5. verse hee understandeth of the first growing of the plants in the creation which was done without raine or dew but the 6. verse hee referreth to that ordinary course which God appointed afterward by dewes and raines to refresh the earth 4. Musculus will have the 6. verse of the ascending of vapours to be understood of the very time of creation that God used those helps of nature but this were to tye God unto meanes wherefore I take it with Iunius to be an explanation of the former verse that it had neither yet rained nor any mist had ascended when God onely by his word caused the plants to grow out of the earth this is the exposition of R. Saadia which Kimâ—i preferreth before all the rest QVEST. IX Whether Paradise were terrestriall Vers. 8. THe Lord planted a garden eastward in Eden c. Hierome readeth for eastward à principiâ— from the beginning whereas the word is Kedem the East translated by the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that Hieromes conceit that God made Paradise before the heaven and earth tradit in 2. gen is grounded upon the false interpretation of this place and how could Paradise which was upon the earth be planted before the earth was founded 2. Their conceit is removed that imagine Paradise to bee no terrene or corporall place but to be spiritually understood as Philo lib. de mund opâ—fic and Origen whom Epiphanius confuteth by this reason that where there are true rivers as Euphrates which is confessed of all to bee one of the rivers of Paradise where were also very trees and plants there Paradise must bee a terrestriall place epist. ad Ioann Hierosâ—l 3. Neither can the whole earth be taken for Paradise as some have thought because it is said here to bee planted in Eden which was the name of a speciall country Esech 27.23 Harah Canneth Eden are joyned together QVEST. X. Where Paradise was situate LIkewise for the situation of Paradise 1. it was neither in a remote place beyond the Ocean which opinion is attributed to Ephrem 2. nor a place higher than all the earth Damasc. lib. 2. de fid orthodox c. 14. 3. nor next unto heaven as Rupertus de Trinitat c. 37. 4. nor reaching up to the Moone as some other have imagined 5. nor in the aire though not so high as the Moone as Alexander Hales and Tostatus 6 nor under the Equinoctiall Bonavent in 2. senten c. 17. for these rivers Tigris and Euphrates which flowed out of Paradise and the country Eden where Paradise was came not neare the Equinoctiall and they are knowne to be in Asia not in any remote and unknowne countrey in earth not in the aire or next to the Moone All these are ridiculous childish fancies and need no long confutation QVEST. XI Of the tree of life Vers. 9. THe tree of life c. 1. This was a visible tree planted in the midst of Paradise in a visible place not spiritually or allegorically to be understood as Origen thinketh 2. neither is it called the tree of life because it was able to give immortality and to preserve from death for ever as Tostatus or onely because it was able to preserve man from death till such time as hee should bee translated to immortality as Scotus in 2. lib. sent dist 19. qu. 1. and Thomas with others 4. Neither need it bee disputed whether the tree of life had this power to preserve from death by a supernaturall gift as Bonaventure or by a naturall faculty as Hugo Thomas Pererius upon this place 5. For it is evident that this tree had no power to give immortality at all by the taste of the fruit thereof 1. because that no corruptible food can make the body incorruptible but the fruit of this tree could not nourish nature without corruption and alteration and without nourishment it could not give life to the body 2. Againe man had by his creation power given him to dye if he had not sinned wherfore immortality was the gift of his creation not effect of the eating of the tree 3. And if it could have giveÌ„ immortality it must have had a power to preserve from sin for by sinning man became mortall so that if it could not defend him from sin it was no more the tree of life in regard of the effect than any other tree of the garden for if he had not sinned he should not have dyed what fruit soever he had eaten of that only tree of knowledge of good and evill excepted 6. Then our opinion is this that it was called the tree of life not so much for the operation though we confesse it might give strength and vertue also to the body Mercer but chiefly for the signification because it was both a signe of life received from God and a symbole of Christ who is our true life and herein we approve rather the opinion of Augustine Eugubinus in Cosmopeia who thinketh it was called the tree of life not effective but significative not effectually but significatively as a signe of true immortality which he should receive of God if he continue in obedience First it is the tree of life as the other was of knowledge of good and evill which was not so called because it gave knowledge but was a seale unto them of their miserable knowledge which they should get by experience in their transgression Magister lib. 3. distinct 17. therefore the tree of life must be so called because it was a seale and pledge of life secondly thus the Scripture significatively and simbolically expoundeth the tree of life Prov. 5.18 Wisdome which is Christ is a tree of life Revel 2.7 To him that overcommeth will I give to eat of the tree of life see more of this Synops 17. cont err 5. QVEST. XII Of the tree of knowledge of good and evill vers 9. THe tree of knowledge of good and evill First we affirme that this was a visible materiall tree not
in faith Heb. 11.4 3. It should seeme that God by some outward testimony approved Abels sacrifice whether it were by kindling it by fire from heaven as hee did to Moses sacrifice Levi. 9.24 and Elias 1 King 18. as Hierome thinketh and Theodoâ—ion readeth Deui inflammavit c. God set on fire Abels sacrifice or by the rebounding of the flame of Cains sacrifice upon himselfe as the fire of the furnace whereinto the three children were cast slew those that made it Dan. 3.22 It is like that by some visible signe God delivered his acceptance as the Apostle saith God testifying of his gifts Heb. 11.4 Iunius Mercerus and Calvin referre this to Abels prosperous successe but I approve rather the other opinion 4. Ambrose note may well here be received ubi nascuntur hi fratres c. that in the birth of these children the order of nature is observed the eldest is named first ubi exprimitur disciplina vivendi seniori junior antefertur but when mention is made of their religion the yonger is preferred before the elder and first named ex Perer. QVEST. III. Vers. 7. IF thou doe well c. 1. The Septuagint here translate very corruptly as is before shewed which while some of the fathers followed they did weary themselves with many interpretations Ambrose saith he divided not aright quia ante omnia Deo debuit offerre primitias because hee offered not the first fruits unto God but kept them to himselfe be quiet that is erubesce be ashamed of thy sin Chrysâ—stome expoundeth it of Cains intention that it was not good and be quiet that is tranquilitatem facito cogitationum appease thy thoughts and proceed not to adde sin unto sin against thy brother Augustine non recte dividendo i. non rectevivendo he divided not aright because he offered a good sacrifice in it selfe leading an evill life quiesce i. manus á scelere contine be quiet keep thy hands from mischiefe Thus while they justifie a corrupt translation if thou divide not aright which the Hebrew hath not they are divided among themselves the sense is evident that if he did well upon his repentance he should finde forgivenesse if not sinne lay at the doore both inwardly gnawing upon his conscience and outwardly drawing speedy punishment To lye at the doore sheweth that the punishment of sinne is ready at hand so that it cannot properly bee referred to the day of judgement as the Chalde paraphrast which is prolonged and deferred QVEST. IIII. How Abels desire was subject to Christ. VNto thee his desire shall be subject Which is not understood of sinne as Ruperâ—us that sinne while it is in the desire and not effected a man may subdue it as Olâ—aster because the punishment of sin committed hath a desire to lay hold of the offender as Ambrose expoundeth the turning thereof shall bee toward thee in te revertetur crimen quod à te â—â—pit the sinne returneth upon thee where it began And so Augustine that then a man hath dominion over sinne when non defendendo sibi praeposuerit sed penitendo subjecerit he doth not advance it by defence but subjecteth it by repentance But this clause as Chrysosostome well taketh it is understood of Abels subjection to his brother as the elder post peccatiam hoc permitto ut primigâ—nitura privilegiâ—â— gandeas though thou hast sinned I deprived thee not of the privilege of thy birthright and so the Lord would appease the wrath of Cain towards his brother by shewing his ready and willing subjection unto his elder brother both by the law of nature and his owne ready disposition Iun. Mercerus with the rest expoundeth it of sin but the other exposition is more proper QVEST. V. Of the talke betweene Cain and Abel Vers. 8. THen Cain spake to his brother Abel .1 It is superfluous to inquire what Cain said to Abel the Septuagint and the vulgar latine doe make these to be his words Let us goe into the field but they are added to the text Hierome thinketh he rehearsed those words which God before spake to Cain the paraphrast of Hierusalem supposeth this to have beene the talke that Cain affirmed there was no Judge that governed the world nor no other life but this nor reward for the righteous or punishment for the wicked because his oblation was not accepted as well as his brothers Abel did hold the contrary some thinke that Cain provoked Abel with angry and furious words into the field but then it is not like that Abel would have gone with him but it is more probable that Cain dissembled and spake friendly to his brother till he had him in the field where seeing they were alone he might execute his wicked purpose QVEST. VI. How Cain killed Abel 2. AS touching the manner of death it is not like as the Hebrewes imagine that Cain worried Abel with his teeth it was such a death whereby Abels bloud was abundantly shed and that in many places for the word is in the plurall number vox sanguinum the voyce of his blouds so that it is like to have beene done with bats or stones or by some such meanes and when he had slaine his brother he buried and hid his body because the Lord asked him where his brother was Pererius But the Hebrewes conceit because it is said that Cain rose against Abel that Cain was first downe and then rose againe hath no ground QVEST. VII The sinne and punishment of Cain Vers. 9. 1. COncerning Cains sin hee sheweth himselfe a lyer in saying I know not wicked and prophane in thinking that he could hide his sin from God unjust in denying to be his brothers keeper or that hee ought to have any care of him obstinate and desperate in not confessing his sinne but stubburnly complaining of the greatnesse of his punishment 2. Hee sustaineth a threefold punishment he is cursed in his soule a vagabond in his body unprosperous in his labours the earth should not yeeld her fruit thus as the Devill was cursed so Cain is the Devils minister to Adam God said not cursed art thou but cursed is the earth for thy sake Genes 3.17 and as Cain for slaying righteous Abel is made a runnagate so the Iewes for shedding the bloud of Christ the most innocent Lamb of God are vagabonds to this day over the face of the earth QVEST. VIII Whether Cain confessed his sinne Vers. 13. MY sinne or punishment is greater this was no confession of his sinne as Chrysostome thinketh sufficiens confessio sed intempestiva a sufficient confession but unseasonable because God had given sentence upon Cain and therefore his confession came too late for no confession in this life is unseasonable neither doth Cain complaine of the greatnesse of his sinne as some translators have it but rather of the greatnesse of his extreme punishment because he feared lest every man might have liberty to kill him as he himselfe expoundeth
it as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
signifieth to fall were not so called either because they were fallen in stature from the hugenesse of the first Giants as Ramban neither as R. Sel. because they were the cause of ruine of falling to themselves or others nor yet onely because they were Apostataes and sell from God Iun. but they were so called in respect of their great stature the sight whereof caused men to fall to the ground for feare Ab. Ezra Mercer 8. Neither was their talnesse or greatnesse of stature simply evill but because they abused their strength to lust and violence and so became both monstrous in their body and soule and begat a monstrous generation like to themselves Mercer QVEST. IX The space of an hundred and twenty yeares how to be reckoned 6. HIs dayes shall be 120. yeares c. 1. Which is not referred to the age of man as Tostatus and Rupertus thinke because Moses the writer hereof lived no longer for although it be true that mans life was shortned after the floud and thrice halfed from 900. and odde to 400. and odde as in Arphaxad that lived 425. yeares and then halfed againe from 400. and odde to 200. and odde as in Serug that lived 230. and then almost halfed to 100. and odde as in Abraham that lived an 175. yeares yet wee see that many of these exceeded an 120. We rather with Hierome Chrysostome and others take this time set to be that space of yeares which God gave unto the old world for their repentance which were not shortned by twenty yeares as Hierome thinketh because of their wickednesse for the floud came an 100. yeares after when Noah was 600. yeares old Gen. 7.6 Neither need we say with Augustine that Noah was said to be 500. yeare old when he was but 480. because he had lived the most part of it for Sem was but an 100. yeare old two yeare after the floud Gen. 11.10 but now he should be an 120. if Noah were then but 480. when he beganne to have his sonnes Therefore this doubt is more easily reconciled to say that this time was set before Noah was 500. yeares of age but by way of anticipation mention is made of Noahs sonnes before because of the continuing of the story as we see the like Gen. 2. where the creation of the woman is recorded after the seventh day being done the first Mer. Per. QVEST. X. Of the originall of Giants 7. NOw as touching the originall of Giants 1. first the opinion of Paulus Burgensis is to be refused who thinketh they were Devills called in Hebrew Nephilim cadentes of falling because they fell from heaven for these Giants were destroyed by the floud so were not the Devils and the Giants were called Nephilim both in respect of their terrible stature which made men fall to the ground and for their Apostasie in falling away from vertue and piety 2. As absurd is the opinion of Franciscus Georgius that these Giants were begotten of spirits companying with women and that otherwise they are not engendred and that these are the seed of the Serpent betweene whom and the seed of the woman the Lord put enmitie for this cause saith he since the comming of Christ who hath broken the Serpents head we read of no such commixion of the spirits with women nor of this generation of Giants Thus Franciscus Georg. 6. tom problem 33. c. 33.1 But these fansies may be easily controlled 1. For Giants to be procreated of men is no more against nature than for Pygmees and Dwarfes that are as much admirable for their smalnesse as the other are for their talnesse such an one was one Canopas in Augustines time that was but two foot and a hand breadth high 2. That spirits have used the carnall company of men and women since Christ Augustine sheweth lib. 15. de Civit. Dei c. 23. and experience confirmeth the same though thereof there can be no generation 3. And likewise it is evident that there have beene men and women of Giants stature since Christ Augustine maketh mention of a woman of admirable talnesse her parents being but of ordinary stature lib. 15. de Civit. Dei c. 23. and Pliny of a man in Augustus time of nine foot and a halfe in height 4. Neither are these Giants that seed of the Serpent for they are also begotten of women neither were all Giants men of great stature wicked persons for it is not unlike but that Adam Noah and other Patriarks before the floud much exceeded the ordinary stature of men now and the Ecclesiasticall stories make mention of one Christophorus a man of twelve cubits in height that was put to death under Decius the Emperour for the Christian faith And further all the naturall seed of women are not at enmity with the Serpent but many of them he useth as his agents and instruments This place then is much abused to that purpose wherefore it is alleaged These Giants then were no other but the naturall off-spring of men and women in those dayes before the floud not that all were such but these were such which were so borne by this unlawfull conjunction betweene the seed of the righteous and the wickd race for as the root was so was the branch the marriage unholy and the issue ungratious QVEST. XI How God is said to repent 8. Vers. 6. IT repented the Lord. The ancient writers have diversly collected of these words but all to good purpose 1. Chrysostome saith it is Verbum nostrae parvitati accommodatum a word applied to our weaknesse to expresse the greatnesse of their sinnes Quae misericordem Deum indignari fecerunt which compelled the mercifull God to be angry 2. Theodoret It repenteth me c. that is I have purposed to destroy man as the Lord saith it repenteth me that I have made Saul King that is I have decreed to depose him and so as Augustine well saith Non est perturbatiâ— sed judicium quo irrogaetur poena it is no perturbation in God this repentance but an imposition of punishment 3. Rupertus in that it repented the Lord pietatis est it sheweth his piety how loth the Lord is to punish but in that the Lord purposeth to destroy them severi judicii est it sheweth his just severity 4. But Augustine more to the purpose saith Paenitudo Dei est mutandorum immutabilis ratio Repentance in God is his unchangeable disposition of changeable things God is not changed but the things altered 5. Iustinus Martyr hath most plainly opened this point God is immutable Sed cum ii quos curat mutantur mutat ipse res prout â—is expedit quos curat but when they whom God careth for are changed then God changeth the course of things as he seeth expedient for them For God immutabiliter ignoscit unchangeably forgiveth those repent as the Ninivites and immutabiliter non ignoscit unchangably forgiveth them not which amend not as Saul
it is most like that Noah was exercised in most excellent workes yet Moses omitteth to speake of them as also of the rest godly succeeding fathers because he hasteth to the story of faithfull Abraham who was diversly honoured of God 1. in being selected to be the father of his people and visible Church 2. hee received the visible signe of the covenant circumcision whereby the people of God should be distinguished from all other 3. to him were given most rich promises both temporall for the possession of the land of Canaan and spirituall concerning the Messiah 5. But whereas it pleased some of the fathers to turne this story of Noahs drunkennesse to an allegory resembling the Jewes to the true vine that Noah planted Christ to Noah that was cast into the sleepe of death by his owne people the Jewes deriding Christ infirmâ—ties and sufferings upon the crosse to C ham scorning his fathers nakednesse I hold it not safe wading without a bottome and therefore I omit these allegoricall applications as mens fancies and so leave them 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Liberty granted to eat flesh Vers. 3. EVery thing that moveth shall bee meat for you Here this liberty to eat flesh is granted to all wherefore for religion sake for we speak not of the prohibition politicall to forbid the eating of some meats infringeth this liberty granted by the Lord. Calvin 2. Doct. The prohibition of not eating of bloud not perpetuall Vers. 4. FLesh with the life thereof Tertullian writeth that in his time it was counted an heinous thing to taste the bloud of beasts but we must know that this prohibition was not perpetuall but for those times the better afore hand to inure them to beare the yoke of Legall ceremonies afterward to be given The Apostles likewise willed for a time the forbearance from strangled and bloud only because of offending the beleeving Jewes but these ceremoniall observations as touch not taste not handle not are now abolished in Christ. Coloss. 2.21 3. Doct. The liberty of marriage generall Vers. 7. BRing forth fruit and multiply Here the liberty of marriage is granted to all this blessing of increasing and multiplying is given to all Noahs posterity of all sorts and degrees wherefore the Papall restraint of marriage in some callings and degrees is contrary to the divine indulgence and permission in this place Oâ—colampad 4. Doct. The word and Sacraments must be joyned together Vers. 12. THis shall bee the signe of my covenant Here wee see the word and the signe or Sacrament goe together first the Lord maketh a covenant and then addeth a signe as a seale thereof for better assurance The Chalde paraphrast interpreteth not amisse this shall bee a signe betweene my word and the earth Wherefore the edifying word must goe before and the Sacraments concurre as seales 5. Doct. In the visible Church hypocrites mingled with the faithfull Vers. 22. WHen C ham the father of Canaan We see that in the visible Church the wicked are mixed together with the faithfuâ—l as in Adams family there was a Caine with an Abel so in Noahs house there is a Cham for a Sem. So the Apostle saith in a great house there are vessels of gold and vessels of silver some of honour some of dishonour The Church of God shall not be purged from all drosse in this life till it be made a glorious spouse without spot and wrinkle in the kingdome of heaven 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. No wickednesse to eat flesh Vers. 3. EVery thing that moveth That which God permitteth is lawfull therefore Ovid was deceived that thus writ heu quantum scelus est in viscera condi c. it is a wicked thing in deed with other flesh our bellies to feed How can that be counted a wicked thing which the Lord alloweth 2. Confut. Of negative doctrine 2. WHereas it is a common objection of the Papists that the Protestants doctrine and principles be altogether negative if it were so which to be otherwise is other where shewed at large yet it might be warranted by this place whereas Pererius a man of their owne side though more reasonable than the rest confesseth that there are two precepts given to man and both negative the one morall and perpetuall not to shed mans bloud v. 5. the other ceremoniall and temporary not to eat flesh with the bloud 3. Confut. The covenant belongeth to infants though presently they want Faith Vers. 12. BEtweene me and every living thing to perpetuall generation c. If God make a covenant even with unreasonable creatures that have no understanding it is no sufficient reason to exclude infants from the covenant as the Anabaptists doe because presently they want faith And seeing God made not this covenant only with that present age but with the generations following why should not the covenant of grace be extended also unto infants which are the succeeding generation Calvin 4. Confut. Noahs drunkennesse not without sinne Vers. 21. HE was drunken and uncovered c. Pererius noteth here ebrietatem Noe excusandum est ab omni peccato that Noahs drunkennesse must be excused from all sinne because it was involuntary and proceeded of ignorance for he never is read to have beene drunke againe But this is a very corrupt glosse for admit that Noah was ignorantly overtaken of the force of wine which yet is not sufficiently proved yet ignorance excuseth not aÌ„ toto sed a tanto from all sinne but from a greater sinne the sinne is not adnihilate that is made no sinne by ignorance but onely extenuate made a lesse sin unlesse they will in like manner excuse the incest of Lot from all sin because it was involuntary 2. What though Noah committed not the like afterward no more did Iudas lye any more with his daughter in law Thamar Genes 38.26 yet that did not exempt his unchast action from sinne no more doth this Noahs intemperancy 3. We are not afraid therefore to the glory of God to confesse the infirmities of holy men which the Scripture hath not concealed and wee say with Ambrose Patriarchae nos instruunt non solum docentes sed errantes the Patriarkes instruct us not only teaching but erring 5. Confut. Popish Bishops not the fathers of the Church and therefore may be discovered Vers. 23. BY the example of Sem and Iapheth covering their fathers nakednesse Pererius againe noteth that the like piety should be shewed toward our spirituall fathers the Bishops of the Church as Constantine said that if he should find a Bishop committing adultery hee would rather cover that uncleane act with his cloake than others should be offended c. Ans. 1. True it is that if those popish Bishops which he speaketh of were the fathers indeed and shepherds of the Church such as Constantine meaneth and not rather the Ministers of Antichrist and devourers of the flock their infirmities should be covered Calvin 2. If their
was a time of abstinency 2. Neither as some that for the more speedy increase of the world children were borne in a shorter time as at 7. moneths 3 Nor yet that Elam and Assur might bee twins both borne at a birth 4. But I rather thinke that Arphacsad might be either the eldest of all or the second of Sems sonnes for the scripture observeth not the order of time in setting downe names as we saw before in rehearsing of Sem Ham and Iapheth QVEST. XVIII Why it is here omitted in the genealog of these fathers and he died FVrther whereas in the Patriarkes lives before the floud it is added and hee died which is omitted here 1. Some thinke it is to shew that Henoch died not a common death as the rest did 2. Some to signifie that none of them perished in the floud 3. Some yet are more curious aâ— Bahai who thinketh this clause and he died to bee here omitted because Messiah was to come of this line whom they hold to be immortall and further he prescribeth Messiah his age that hee should live 837. yeares before the end of the sixt millenary or thousand yeare which hee would gather by the letters of the word Lemarbaty used by the Prophet Isay 9.7 which is of the increase of his government there shall bee no end where the first letter lamed signifieth 30. men 600. râ—sh 200. beth 2. he 5. which maketh together 837. But it is evident to all the world how they are deceived for the six thousand yeare is expired within lesse than 400. yeares and yet their supposed Messiah commeth not and againe Messiah came as well of the line of the fathers before the floud as of them after the floud 4. Wherefore this is more like to bee the reason because then after Adams transgression Moses would shew how the curse tooke place thou shalt dye the death in those long lived patriarkes that although they lived divers hundred yeares yet in the end they dyed Mercerus QVEST. XIX At what age of Terah Abraham was borne Vers. 26. TErah lived 70. yeares and begat Abraham c. Terah lived 205. yeares and died in Charran at what time Abraham was 75. yeares old Genes 12.5 Abraham then was borne when his father was an 130. yeare old not in his 70. yeare for the reconciliation then of these places 1. We need not with Hierome that followeth therein the Hebrewes to say that Abrahams age of 75. yeares is not counced from his birth but from his departure from Vr. of the Chaldes and his miraculous deliverance out of the fire wherein they cast him because he would not worship their Idols for beside that this tradition of Abrahams deliverance hath no sufficient ground to warrant it a great inconvenience will follow it if it bee admitted that Abraham was an 130. yeare old at this time when he is said to bee but 75. which must of necessitie followe if Abraham were borne in the 70. yeare of Therah then it would follow that Isaack borne when Abraham was an 100. yeare old was borne 30. yeare before hee came into the land of Canaan which is contrarie to the Scripture or if they will count those hundred yeares also from Abrahams departure out of Chaldea and that he was indeed an 160. yeares old when Isaack was borne and Isaack was 40. yeare old his father yet living when he tooke Rebeccah to wife Genes 25.20 Abraham should have lived above 200. yeares whereas the Scripture saith he lived but an 175. Genes 25.7 2 Neither is it a sufficent answer that Abraham went out of Charran at 75. yeares of his age long before his fathers death and that Moses doth recapitulate the story afterward as Aben Ezra for Steven saith that God brought him out after his father was dead Act. 7.4 And to say his father was spiritually dead not naturally because he staied still and refused to goe into Canaan living in idolatrie which is the devise of one Andreas Masins cited by Pererius is a forcing of Stephens words which in an historicall narration must be taken properly 3. And with Augustine to make two departures of Abraham into the land of Canaan the one when Terah was yet living being an 105. yeare old and Abraham 75. sojourning there 60. yeares while his father lived in Charran and another after Therâ—hs death whome Abraham might visite before going and comming into Canaan but now he came from thence his father being dead and returned no more that in the first departure his bodie remooved but his affection was toward that place where his father was but now his affection and all was removed This imagination of two departures into Canaan dissenteth from Stephens narration Act. 7. where indeed he speaketh of two journeyes of Abraham one out of Mesopotamia the other out of Charan But into Canaan the Lord brought him after his father was dead v. 4. and not before 4. That also is a meere fancy that the rest of Abrahams age is concealed who should be an 130. when hee is said to be but 75. to this intent because God would keepe secret the end of the world Calvin for this would nothing have helped to the knowledge of that secret the account of yeares past will not tell us what yeares are to come and our Saviour saith the Angels know not of that day and yet they knew very well the age of Abraham 5. Wherefore the best solution is that Abraham though he be named first because of the privilege and preeminencie of his faith yet was not the first borne Terah at 70. yeares began to have sonnes but Abraham was not borne till the 130. yeare of his fathers age for he was but 75. at his fathers death who was then 205. So Noah is said to be 500. yeare old when he begat Sem Cham and Iapheth yet was not Sem borne till two yeares after Gen. 11.10 beside Sarah is held to have beene Abrahams brothers daughther Abraham then could not be the eldest brother for Sara was but 10. yeares younger than Abraham Gen. 17.17 Iun. QVEST. XX. Sarai not sister but neece to Abraham Vers. 29. THe father of Milcha and of Iscah c. 1. Some thinke that this Iscah was not Sarai Abrahams wife but that shee was rather the daughter of Thare and Abrahams owne sister by the fathers side than the daughter of his brother Aran and that it was lawfull then for the halfe brother by the fathers side to marrie his sister sic Clement Alexand. Lippoman Cajetan Scotus 2. Others thinke that Sarai was not the naturall but the adopted daughter of Thare 3. But the truer opinion is that Sarai was the daughter of Haran sister to Lot and Milcah and the same that is called Iscah as may appeare by these reasons thus thinke Iosephus and Augustine Iunius 1. It is like that as Nachor married the one sister so Abraham married the other because it was their great care not
Sept. have not these words the rest have v. 6. unto an high oake S. famous valley H. unto the plaine of Morch caet celon signifieth both an oake and a valley or plaine v. 8. Bethel toward the west caeter toward the sea S. heb because the Mediterranean Sea was in the west side of Canaan v. 9. in the desart S. toward the South caeter negebh signifieth both v. 11. tooke his journey toward the East T. tooke his journey first C. from the East câ—t heb micehedem toward the East Gen. 28. v. 13. Say I am his sister S. thou art my sister caet I shall live for thy sake H. T. by thy occasion B. shall be preserved by thee G. for thy words C. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of thee S.P. heb biglal propter because v. 16. mules and Camels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. she ashes and camels câ—t athon a she asse chamer an hee asse the mule is the shee v. 19. I have taken her to my wife S.C.P. I might have taken her caet 3. The Exegesis or Theologicall Explication QVEST. I. Where and how the Lord spake to Abraham Vers. 1. FOr the Lord had said c. 1. God thus spake to Abraham not after his fathers death but while he was yet in Mesopotamia Act. 7.2 for to what end should the Lord have thus said Get thee out of the countrey c. if hee had beene come out thence already Calvin 2. Wee read that God spake unto Abraham eight times Gen. 12.1 againe v. 7. and c. 13.14 and c. 15.4 and 17.1 also c. 18.9 and c. 21.9 and 22. 1. It is like that divers other times the Lord spake unto him but these are expressed 2. And how God spake unto Abraham Basil thinketh it was citra ullam corporis vocem without any corporall or outward voyce but by the illumination of his minde Ramban thinketh it was by dreame some that God spake to him by Sem or some other Prophet but in this place it is like that God spake to Abraham either by himselfe or his Angels when he spake by dreame in sleepe or by vision when he was waking it is so expressed in the text as c. 15.1 QVEST. II. Whether God named it a countrey to Abraham whither he called him TO the land that I will shew thee c. 1. When the Lord thus called to Abraham hee named no certaine countrey whither hee should goe for the better triall of his faith for the Apostle saith Hee knew not whither hee went Hebr. 11.8 and Stephen Act. 7.3 nameth no countrey whither hee was called 2. Whereas Canaan is named in the former chapter vers 31. either Moses setteth downe the name of the country by way of anticipation or God might afterward shew unto Abraham as he went whither hee would have him to goe Calvin R. Isaach Carus thinketh that at the first Abraham understood that countrey to the which hee was called to be Canaan because of the curse that hee should be a servant c. but that is not like QVEST. III. Wherefore Abraham was called out of Chaldea into Canaan ANd the Lord called Abraham out of Chaldea into Canaan 1. Because Chaldea was given to abominable Idolatry and other great corruptions of life where Abraham could not remaine without great danger 2. That Gods blessing in the multiplying of Abrahams seede might better appeare abroad in a strange countrey Perer. 3. But the greatest cause was not as some thinke to converse with Sem who is held to be Melchizedek but that Abraham might take possession of that countrey and by faith and hope enioy that which was promised to be given to his seede Calvin QVEST. IIII. Where Abraham was when the Lord first called him Where Abraham should be when as God first called him there are divers opinions 1. It can neither be as Augustine thinketh that Abraham was called after he was departed out of Chaldea before he came to Charran beeing yet in Mesopotamia for to what end should the Lord have bidden Abraham to goe out of his countrey if he had beene removed alreadie To say with Augustine and Eucherius that now he is commanded to leave his countrey in affection as he had alreadie done in bodie hath no probabilitie for both Abraham should have beene disobedient to Gods Vocation beeing wedded still in desire to his countrie and it is not like that he had a minde to returne to an idolatrous countrey where he was to expect nothing but persecution Steven indeed saith he was in Mesopotamia when God called him but Mesopotamia is there taken largely as it comprehendeth Siria and Chaldea and so Steven saith that he came out of the land of the Chaldeans Act. 7.4 Mercer 2. Neither was Abraham twice called once in Chaldea and againe in Charran as Rupertus and Tostatus thinke upon this place for this had argued Abrahams sloth and negligence if hee had made no more haste to obey the calling of God Steven also Act. 7. maketh mention but of one calling 3. To say further that Steven beeing occupied with other matters might forget himselfe and not well remember the circumstance of time or that he was contented to follow the vulgar account is to doe wrong to so holie a man being directed by the spirit of God to speake neither doth Eucherius answer satisfie that expoundeth Steven thus that Abraham was placed in the land of Canaan after the death of Terah he might depart from Charran his father yet living but all that while hee was a sojourner in Canaan had no certaine place till after his fathers death Contra. But this sense is contrarie to the text that God after his fathers death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated or brought Abraham into Canaan this must be understood not of Abrahams setling in Canaan but his first remove thither 4. Neither is Lyranus opinion sound who therein followeth Rasi and Mizrahi that the calling which Moses here speaketh of was that in Charran for Abraham is bidden to come out of his countrey but Charran was not his countrey and the Lord saith hee brought him out of Vr of the Chaldeans chap. 15.7 not out of Charran But Paulus Burgensis opinion is farre wide that Charran was Abrahams countrie not Chaldea for Vr of the Chaldees is called the land of his brother Arans nativitie now whereas Abraham calleth it his countrie where Naâ—or dwelt in Charran in Aram Naharahim or Mesopotamia Gen. 24.8.4.10 there Mesopotamia or Naharaim the countrie betweene the rivers is taken in a large sense as it containeth both Siria and Chaldea as is before shewed or for that all his kindred were now remooved thither Mercer 5. Wherefore the truth is that Abraham was in Chaldea when the Lord called him so Aben Ezra Mercer for so the Lord saith cap. 15.7 and although he is bid to leave his kindred who came with him as Terah and Lot yet for all this his calling was in
to deale with the gain-saying Jewes would not so much stand upon his Apostolike illumination neither would they rest upon it 3. Neither is the word seed taken here not singularly for the person of Christ but collectively for the whole spirituall seed of Abraham the people of God consisting of the Jewes and Gentiles Beza for this sense seemeth to bee coact and not proper and the Apostle himselfe denieth it to bee understood of many but of one 4. Neither doth Saint Paul ground his argument upon the received opinion and confession of the Jewes which hee was experienced in being brought up under the feet of Gamaliel who all generally did hold this promise of blessing in Abrahams seed to be understood of the Messiah Perer. for thus the Apostles reasoning should be inverted and that made his conclusion which is his argument for the Apostle doth not reason thus This place is referred to the Messiah Ergo he saith not seeds but seed But thus rather standeth his argument In saying seed not seeds hee meaneth but one Ergo the Messiah that is Christ. 5. Wherefore if the Apostles words bee thorowly weighed and examined he enforceth two conclusions in this one sentence the first is that this place out of Moses must needs be interpreted not of all Abrahams seed confusedly but of some one specially the other is that this being evicted that the Lord in this promise speaketh but of one it will follow of necessity that this one must be Christ. For the first that Abrahams seed is not understood promiscuè for all his seed the Jewes themselves could not deny for this seed was first restrained to Isaack and Ismael excluded then in Isaack it was assigned to Iacob and Esau refused in Iacob this seed was singled out in Iuda when the other tribes were carried into captivity and never returned therefore seed here cannot bee taken for many but wee must still proceed in descending till we come to one in whom this blessing is performed Calvin For the second that this one must be Christ it will necessarily follow because none else can be named in whom all the Gentiles received this blessing for that place Psal. 72.17 All nations shall blesse him and be blessed in him cannot be understood of Salomon who was so farre from procuring a blessing to all nations that he brought a curse upon his owne nation and posterity when for his idolatry a rent was made in the Kingdome the smallest part falling to the share of his sonne Rehoboam And beside this Psalme is a propheticall song of Christ under the type of Salomon as vers 5. They shall â—eare him as long as the Sunne and Moone endureth vers 11. All Kings shall worship him vers 17. His name shall endure for ever These sayings cannot be uttered of Salomon or any other mortall man but onely are true of the Lord Messiah There being then none else found by whom the Gentiles were spiritually blessed in being called from their filthy idolatry to the knowledge and worship of the true God in being lightned with Scriptures brought to the acknowledgement and so remission of their sinnes but onely Christ none else in whom they beleeve whose name is blessed among them Who can this else bee but Jesus Christ the Messiah And thus it is evident that the Apostle hath reasoned strongly from this place that salvation commeth not by the Law but by faith in Christ which is the thing the Apostle in this place intendeth to prove QUEST XXIII Whether Abrahams obedience or Isaacks patience were more notable IT may seeme that Isaacks obedience in yeelding himselfe willingly to death was more excellent and worthy of note than Abrahams because it is a greater patience to suffer death for Gods cause than to inferre it Isaack also should have felt the sorrowes and pangs of death in his body which Abraham was onely to behold Notwithstanding these reasons Abrahams example of obedience excelled 1. Because he was to sacrifice his onely most beloved and innocent sonne which was no doubt more grievous unto him than if he had died himselfe 2. Isaacks death came unlooked for it should have beene finished at once Abrahams griefe as it pierced his heart three continuall dayes before so the remembrance of this fact would have continued still 3. The Scripture giveth sentence with Abraham which maketh mention in this place and others beside of Abrahams offering up of Isaack but ascribeth no part thereof to Isaack Now because that example of the King of Moab which offered up the King of Edoms sonne in sacrifice and not his owne as the common opinion is may be thought to resemble Abrahams fact here it shall not be amisse briefly to examine that place as it is set downe 2 King 3.27 QUEST XXIV Whether the King of Moab sacrificed his sonne and wherefore FIrst then 1. Neither is it like that the King of Moab having learned of his Priests that God prospered Israel because of Abrahams faith which doubted not to offer his sonne as Lyranus therefore he attempted to doe the like for at this time the Israelites did not so greatly prosper the kingdome being divided because of the idolatry of Salomon and diversly afflicted and the King of Moab offered not his owne son but the King of Edoms as it is expounded by Amos 2.1 For three transgressions I will not turne to Moab c. because it burnt the bones of the King of Edom as lime 2. Neither did the King of Moab this by the advice of the Priests after the example of Israel because they used to offer up their sons to Molech thinking to please the God of Israel hereby Burgens For the Israelites rather learned this idolatrous use of the Gentiles and the Israelites prospered not but were punished of God for such impieties 3. Nor yet did the King of Moab this to move the Israelites to commiseration when they should see to what misery and necessity he was brought to offer such a bloudy sacrifice as Tostat. and Vatab. for he did it rather to despight them as shall even now appeare 4. Nor yet did he offer this sacrifice only with an intent thereby to appease his gods and to procure their help which opinion indeed the heathen had of such wicked and devillish offerings Cajetan Perer. 5. But it is most likely that the King of Moab assaying to breake thorow to the King of Edom and could not tooke the Kings sonne of Edom that was to reigne after him and therefore is called the King of Edom Amos 2.1 and sacrificed him in the sight of his father to his great griefe Iunius QUEST XXV What was the cause of the indignation against Israel SEcondly where it followeth thus For that Israel was sore grieved and they departed from him or there was great indignation against Israel 1. This is not referred to the indignation or wrath of God as though the Lord should be offended with Israel sent a plague amongst them
the Assignes of THOMAS MAN PAVL MAN and IONAH MAN 1632. TO THE MOST HONOVRABLE LORD THE L. DVKE OF LENOX AND TO THE RIGHT Honourable the Earle of Marre Lords of his Majesties most Honourable Privie Counsell Grace mercie and Peace from the Lord JESUS RIght Honourable as the highest Majestie in his wise providence hath united and conjoyned your Honours not onely in one consent and judgement of religion but also in the joynt administration and regiment of this Nation and Kingdome under his excellent Majestie so I thought good to make your Honours with other of your Honourable place united Patrons of these my labours and as he saith non debet charta dividere quos amor mutuus copulavit It was not fit that I should sever you in this my duty who are combined in your mutuall amity Men of noble birth delight much in antiquities and it is their glory to derive their bloud by many descents from their thrice renowned ancestors here I present to your Honourable view that noble and most ancient family of Abraham Isaack and Iacob who were in favour with God and in honour and great reputation with men whose children they are which imitate their piety and obedience that famous Matron Paula whom Hierome so much commendeth was by her father descended of Aeneas and the noble house of the Gracchi by her mother of Agamemnon of whom Hierome made this Epitaph thought her Christian profession more honourable than her noble birth and condition and so I doubt not but that it is also your honourable resolution to say with the Apostle who having rehearsed his great privileges after the flesh his birth parentage and profession thus concludeth I count all these things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Iesus for whom I have counted all things as losse and doe judge them as dung that I might winne Christ as Hierome also saith well Summa apud Deum nobilitas clarum esse virtutibus I it is the greatest nobility with God to shine with vertue Here your Honours have the worthy example of the Patriarks to follow the Heathen presidents are but counterfeit and deceitfull they had the shadowes of vertues rather than the substance as Ambrose saith well of Polemo who of a drunken and riotous companion by hearing of Xenocrates became a Philosopher Siresipâ—ir a vino fuit semper tamen temulentus sacrilegio If hee were sober from wine yet hee was drunke with superstition But these holy examples are seasoned with grace and savour of true religion Abraham was famous in Pharaohs Court so was Isaack in Abimelecks and Iacob in another Pharaohs also for their piety and vertue So they which walke in their steps shall be great both with God and man Abraham told Abimelech plainly of the wrongs which his servants had done him Gen. 21.15 so is it the part of good Courtiers to shew unto the King the wrongs and oppressions that are done in the lanâ— to succour the poore to releeve the oppressed to countenance the truth to maintaine justice and equity Iacob being in Bethel saw a ladder which reached to heaven and the Angels ascending and descending upon it whereupon one thus noteth In the house of Bethel there is alwayes both going up and comming downe this I say not that the goers down should dismay you but the climers up incourage you So in the Princes Bethel and Court there be examples of both sorts of some that are declining and sliding backe onely seeking to make themselves great and to bee enriched by the Kings favour some there are though the smallest number which doe ascend upon this ladder not aspiring to their owne honour but using their favour to the glory of God and benefit of his Church Thus I trust your Lordships have learned to scale this ladder of honour to the which you are called to raise up those which are in the dust to set forward the truth to nourish and encourage the Preachers thereof to speake for the innocent to hold out your helpfull hand to the needy so shall your Honours ascend from step to step till you come to the top of the ladder where Christ sitteth who shall cast and tumble downe from thence all unfaithfull Stewards and cut them off to have their portion with hypocrites Matth. 24.51 but shall say unto you and all other that shall serve him faithfully herein in earth It is well done good servant and faithfull thou hast beene faithfull in little I will make thee ruler over much enter into thy masters joy Amen Your Honours ready to be commanded in the Lord ANDREW WILLET THE FIRST BOOKE OF THIS SECOND PART OF GENESIS Containing the Historie concerning the Patriarks ISAACK IACOB Hitherto hath beene continued the holy story of those three great Patriarks Adam before the floud Noah in the floud Abraham after the floud the rest of this Booke of Genesis followeth which setteth forth the life acts and death of the three other fathers Isaack Iacob Ioseph CHAP. XXV 1. The Contents of the Chapter IN this Chapter 1. Concerning Abraham his second mariage is declared with the issue thereof his children and their gifts vers 1. to 6. Then Abrahams yeares death and buriall vers 7. to 11. 2. Concerning Ismael his generations or off-spring are expressed his yeares of life his place of dwelling vers 12. to 20. 3. Of Isaack there is set downe his time of marriage the barrennesse of his wife the remedie by prayer vers 20.21 4. Concerning Esau and Iacob these things are rehearsed 1. Their manner of conception vers 22 23. 2. Of their birth 24. to 27. 3. Their divers education vers 27 28. 4. Esau his prophanenesse in selling his birth-right for a messe of pottage vers 29. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 1. Abraham had taken him another wife H.G. proceeding or adding tooke another wife caeter v. 2. Zambran Ioctan Madal Sebe S. Zimran Iocksan Madan Shuah caeter v. 3. The sonnes of Dedan were in holds tents and Islands â— the sons of Dedan Asshurim Letushim Leumim v. 4. Gephar Apher Raga S. Epha Epher Eldaha caeter v. 6. Sonnes of the Concubine C. of the Concubines caet v. 8. And fainting or wearing away H.S.C.B. he yeelded up the spirit or died T.G.P. jagaug signifieth to faint gavagh expirare to yeeld the spirit which word is here used v. 11. Isaack dwelt by the Well of the living and seeing H.B. the Well of vision S. Where the Angell of life appeared C. Beâ—r-lahairâ— G.P. the fountaine Lahoiro T. v. 12. Which Hagar the Egyptian Sarahs maid bare H. bare to Abraham caet v. 13. These the names of his sonnes H. of the sonnes of Ismael cat v. 13. Nadbehel Massa. S. Adbehel Mibsa cat v. 18. from Havilah to Agara C. from Havila to Sur. cat v. 18. he died in the presence of all his brethren H.B.P. he dwelt S.C. his lot fell T. G. naphal signifieth 〈◊〉 fall
Psal. 30.5 Muscul. 4. Observ. Not good to make haste to be rich Vers. 13. THe man waxed mighty and still increased Isaack was not made rich at once but hee increased by degrees for the wise man saith He that maketh haste to be rich shall not be innocent Prov. 28.20 Men should not therefore strive suddenly to be rich but wait patiently for his blessing Perer. 5. Observ. Envy for good things Vers. 14. THe Philistims had envy at him c. They had no reason to envy at him and to send him away whom they saw to bee blessed of God But as Chrysostome saith Ita se habet invidiâ— nihil cum ratione operatur Such is the nature of envy it doth nothing with reason Bonis proximi magis quam propriis malis intabescit invidia Envy rather pineth at other mens goods than her owne evill Hom. 52. in Gen. Such was the envy of Cain toward Abel that slew him because his owne workes were evill and his brothers good 1 Ioh. 3.12 6. Observ. The Kingdome of God must first be sought Vers. 25. HE built an altar c. First Moses maketh mention of the building of an altar for the service of God and afterward of the digging of the well which sheweth that first of all things must be sought that belong to the worship of God as our Saviour saith Seek ye first the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse thereof c. Calvin CHAP. XXVII 1. The Argument or Contents THis Chapter sheweth the purpose of Isaack intending to blesse Esau vers 1. to 5. and the disposing of the blessing to Iacob by Gods providence and the preventing or disappointing of Esau in the rest of the Chapter where concerning Iacobs obtaining of the blessing we are to consider 1. The meanes which was the counsell and device of Rebeckah vers 5. to 18. 2. The execution or putting of the same in practice by Iacob vets 18. to 27. 3. The successe which God gave unto it Isaack giveth Iacob the blessing vers 27. to vers 30. In the rejecting of Esau 1. his griefe and sorrow is expressed for the losse vers 31. to 37. 2. his importunity to receive a blessing of his father which hee had to vers 41. 3. His hatred toward Iacob because of the blessing and his malicious purpose to take away his life vers 41. 4. Iacobs deliverance from his brothers cruelty by departing into Mesopotamia through the counsell of his mother 2. The divers readings v. 9. goe to the sheep and bring two kids S.C. goe to the flock cat tsun signifieth a flock of sheep or goats two of the best kids H. faire and tender S. two kids of the goats caeter that is sucking kids T. v. 13. It is told me by prophecie that the curse shall not come upon thee C. the curse be upon me cat v. 23. his hairy hands did expresse the likenesse of the elder brother H. his hands were rough or hairy as his brothers hands cat v. 29. the sonnes of thy father S. of thy mother caet v. 33. he wondred C. was afraid and wondred beyond measure H. he was in an ecstasis or trance S. he was greatly afraid T.B.G.P. heb charad to tremble v. 38. Isaack being pricked in heart Esau cried out c. S. Esau lift up his voyce and wept cater v. 39. the fatnesse of the earth shall be thy blessing H. thy dwelling cat v. 40. it shall come to passe that thou shalt put off his yoke S.H. when his sonnes shall transgresse the wâ—rds of the law thou shalt take away the yoke C. when thou hast mourned thou shalt breake the yoake T. when thou hast got the mastery thou shalt breake his yoke B.G.P. he roâ—h to beare rule to mourne I preferre the latter see q. 13. following v. 41. Esau was angry S. Esau hated Iacob caet heb satam to hate v. 42. doth threaten to kill thee H.S. lie in wait to kill thee C. â—oth comfort himselfe against thee by killing thee caeâ— nacham to comfort v. 43 flye to my brother Laban in Haran caeter to Mesopotamia to my brother Laban in Aran. S. 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of the cause of Isaacks blindnesse and of his age Vers. 1. ISaack was old and his eyes dimme vers 2. I know not the day of my death c. 1. Isaacks blindnesse neither was caused by the smoke of the sacrifices which Esaus wives offâ—red to their idols as the Hebrewes nor yet was he by any extraordinary worke of God smitten blind although God disposed of his blindnesse so that thereby his purpose tooke place concerning Iacob but Isaack was now very old being of 137. yeares and blindnesse is incident to old age as other infirmities of the senses as of the hearing the taste as Barzillai confesseth to David 2 Sam. 19. Moses example whose eyes were not dim at 120. yeares Deut. 34.7 is extraordinary 2. Isaack thinketh his end at hand not as the Hebrewes thinke because he was within five yeares of his mothers age that is 123. Whereas Sarah died at 127. for Isaack was now 137. yeares of age Iacob being now 77. yeare old at what time hee went into Mesopotamia as is shewed before qu. 19. in chap. 25. But Isaack who lived after this 43. yeares doth daily meditate of his end Mercer Perer. 3. Though Isaack was blind and weake in his eyes yet it seemeth his body was of a strong constitution seeing he was able to eat of wild flesh which is of harder digestion Pererius QUEST II. Wherefore Isaack biddeth Esau prepare him meat which he did love Vers. 4. MAke me some savoury meat that my soule may blesse thee c. 1. Some thinke that it was the manner of those dayes that the eldest before he received his fathers blessing did performe some service Lyran. But this no where appeareth in Scripture 2. Some thinke 〈◊〉 this was done that Esau might seeme to deserve his fathers blessing Thom. Anglic. But spirituall blessings such as Isaack bestowed upon Iacob cannot be merited by temporall service 3. Gregory compareth the Jewes to Esau which sought by their owne workes to please God the Gentiles to Iacob that found a more compendious way by faith Hom. 6. in Ezechiel 4. Some by Esaus portion of meat to the which a spirituall blessing is promised doe signifie the duty of the people in paying temporall things for receiving spirituall 5. Rupertus by Isaack promising a blessing for a temporall meat shadoweth forth such Bishops in the Church as doe for temporall rewards sell spirituall blessings 6. But Isaack blind in eyes and blind in affection doth herein shew his partiall love to Esau the Lord in his secret providence over-ruling this action and disposing this occasion to the effecting of his owne purpose QUEST III. Why Isaack preferred Esau for the blessing before Iacob Vers. 4. THat my soule may blesse thee c. 1. Neither is it like as Ramban and other
those which were innocent 5. They take them being sore upon their cutting and circumcising when they were rather to be pitied 6. They spare not Hemor and Sichem who offered to make them satisfaction by marrying Dinah and giving her dowry which they should set 7. Then they spoile the City not contenting themselves only with the goods but they carried away the women children captives 8. As much in them lay they brought Iacob and all his into danger to bee destroyed and overcome of the inhabitants 9. They being reproved of their father doe not acknowledge but justifie their sinne Perer. Calvin It appeareth then that Simeon and Levi diversly sinned in this cruell act whereof Iacob giveth this censure Simeon and Levi brethren in evill the instruments of cruelty are in their habitations into their secret let not my soule come in their wrath they slew a man and in their selfe-will they digged downe a wall cursed bee their wrath c. I will divide theâ— in Iacob c. 〈◊〉 49.6 7. In which 〈…〉 setteth downe their sinne then the punishment Their sinnes were these 1. That in their 〈…〉 they devised mischiefe and sought out how to be â—â—venged dealing 〈…〉 in their wrath 3. They didst of a selfe will of a 〈…〉 or good counsell 4. They enterprised this 〈◊〉 without the counsell or advice of their father 〈…〉 digged downe a wâ—ll to enter into 〈◊〉 and spoyle 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 good Their punishment is they are accursed and the fruit of 〈…〉 are divided in 〈…〉 neither had Simeon any possession by himselfe but intermingled with 〈◊〉 and Levi 〈…〉 among his brethren By this then it is evident that Iacob wholly condemnâ—◠〈…〉 and in nothing approveth it But whereas some would make this sentence of 〈…〉 and referre iâ— to the Levites and Priests of Levi and the Scribes who were most of 〈…〉 are here accursed for putting Christ to death It 〈◊〉 cleare that Iacob speaketh of an act done 〈…〉 denounceth thâ— sentence of 〈◊〉 and division against it Now it is not like that the 〈◊〉 should goe before the fault But Simeon and Levi were divided in Iacob long before Christ came into the world and was put to death by the Priests and Scribes 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Mariage not to be contracted with men of divers profession Vers. 14. WE cannot doe this thing to give our sister to an uncircumcised man c. This i◠〈◊〉 to the Apostles doctrine Be not unequally yoked with infidels for what fellowship 〈◊〉 righteousnesse with unrighteousnesse c. 2 Cor. 6.6 No league or friendship much lesse mariage is to be 〈◊〉 or enterprised with men of a divers profession Calvin 2. Doct. Gods judgements may be just when the ministers thereof are wicked Vers. 25. THey slew every male Simeon and Levi the captaines and chiefe in this savage exploit 〈◊〉 all the males that were men to the sword for the children were carried away captive this was a just reward upon the City for the sinne of Shechem although the instruments and minister◠〈…〉 did evill We see then that Gods judgements are just when notwithstanding the meanes whereby they are executed cannot be justified as the triall and affliction of Iob as it proceeded from God was good yet Satan the worker or rather minister thereof did it of malice 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Mariage not without the parents consent Vers. 4. THen said Shechem to his father Hamor give me this maid to wife Shechem would not take a wife but by the consent and leave of his father and this generally was the practice of those dayes Abraham provided a wife for his son Isaack Labaâ— gave his daughters in mariage to Iacob This condemneth then the practice of the Church of Rome where it is an ordinary thing for children to bee contracted and marry without their parents consent Muscul. 2. Confut. Against election by works Vers. 25. SImeon and Levi tooke either of them his sword Simeon and Levi two fathers of the Israelites and the one chosen out from his brethren to execute the priest-hood we see what their doings and works were they were guilty of much bloud God chose them not then for their owne vertue or worthinesse but for his owne mercy sake So saith Moses The Lord did not set his love upon you nor chuse you because c. but because the Lord loved you Deut. 7.8 So the Apostle concludeth by the example of Esau and Iacob whom the Lord had chosen and refused the other before they had done either good or evill That the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by works but by him that calleth Rom. 9.11 This maketh against the doctrine of the Church of Rome who ascribe election to the fore-sight of faith and works Rhemist Heb. 5. serm 7. 6. Places of exhortation and morall use 1. Morall That fathers should not suffer their daughters to stray from home Vers. 1. DInah went to see the daughters of the Countrey Bernard hereupon this noteth Sita 〈◊〉 spectas oâ—iose non spectaris tu curiose spectas sed curio 〈◊〉 spectaris thou beholdest idly or vainly but thou art not beheld in vaine thou art curious in seeing others and are more curiously seene thy selfe We see what followed Dinah's wanton and curious gazing upon others gave occasion to the unchaste and adulterous eye to lust after her therefore it is not good to give maidens their 〈◊〉 or to suffer them to wander from home or sightly to behave themselves which hath beene and in the occasion of much evill so the Apostle chargeth that young women should be diâ—erâ—nt chaste 〈…〉 Tit. â— â— Calvin 2. Mor. Sinne committed in the Church and among Christians the more grievous Vers. 7. HE had wrought folly in Israel c. Although no place have any privilege or exemption for sinne yet it is most heinous to perpetrate and commit wickednesse in or against the Church of God Adultery fornication uncleanesse is odious even among the Gentiles but it is most abhominable among Christians As the prophet upbraideth Ierusalem Sodome thy sister hath not done neither she and her daughters as thou and thy daughters Ezech. 16.48 3. Mor. Fornication to be recompenced by marriage Vers. 3. HIs heart clave unto her Shechem having forced Dinah doth not then hate her and cast her off a Ammon did Thamar his sister but his love is the more kindled toward her and he desireth her for his wife which example doth condemne the wicked lust of many which having intised maids unto folly seeke not to make satisfaction by marriage 4. Mor. Spirituall love should bee more forcible then carnall Vers. 19. THe young man deferred not to doe the thing c. Shechem to obtaine his love spareth no cost nor yet refuseth any labour hee accepteth of the hard condition of circumcision which teacheth that if carnall love be so forcible our spirituall love toward Christ should be much more effectuall that
at this time about 180. yeares of age for it was 170. yeares since she came first with Rebeckah into Canaan when shee may well bee supposed to have beene 50. yeare old having the charge and government of Rebeckah 3. It is very like that Rebeckah was now departed for otherwise Deborah would not have left her so long as shee lived 4. There is no mention of Rebeckahs death not because she was buried obscurely and in the night as the Hebrews imagine Isaack being blind and none to bury her but Esau but it is the use of Scripture to make rare mention of the death of women in this place Deborahs death is recorded as an accident that fell out by the way Mercer QUEST V. How Deborah came to be in Iacobs company NOw whereas the question is moved how Deborah came to be in Iacobs company 1. Neither is it like that after she had accompanied Rebeckah into Canaan she went back againe and was now desirous to goe aad see Rebeckah as Chrysostome for shee was sent with Rebeckah to remaine with her 2. Neither did she goe with Iacob at the first when he went into Mesopotamia as Calvin for he was alone in Bethel 3. Neither was she sent as a messenger to fetch Iacob out of Mesopotamia as the Hebrewes for he returned at Gods commandement not at his mothers call 4. Neither as Ramban is it to be supposed that Rebeckah had more nurses then one 5. But it is like that Deborah was sent to meet Iacob being returned Mercer or went to him of her owne accord after Rebeckahs death Cajetan QUEST VI. Of the number of the visions wherein God appeared to Iacob Vers. 9. Againe God appeared unto Iacob c. Not as though this were the second vision in all which Iacob had but it was another vision beside that mentioned in the beginning of the chapter where he is bid to goe up to Bethel or it was the second time that God appeared unto him in Bethel for otherwise to count all the visions that Iacob had this was in number the seventh 1. God appeared unto him in Bethel in the vision of the ladder 2. When in a dreame he was shewed the parti-coloured sheepe Genes 31.11 3. When the Lord bade him returne into his owne countrey Gen. 31.3 4. When the Angels met him Gen. 32.2 5. When the Angell wrestled with him 6. When God bid him goe up to Bethel 7. God appeared againe unto him in Bethel Perer. QUEST VII Whether the name of Israel is here new imposed or but renewed Vers. 10. THy name shall be no more called Iacob but Israel c. 1. Neither iâ— this the same vision which Iacob had when he wrestled with the Angel as Oleaster because the same name is imposed for the text saith that God appeared againe to Iacob vers 9. that is in Bethel 2. Neither as Hierome thinketh was the name of Iacob onely foretold then and imposed now tradit in Genes as Peters name is designed Iohn 1. but actually given him Matth. 12.16 Thom. Anglic. for before this Iacob is twice called by the name of Israel Genes 33.10 and Gen. 34.7 3. Neither as Tostatus and Lyranus thinke is the same name imposed in both places but upon divers reasons for in the first place hee is called Israel because hee prevailed with God and therefore much more with men to signifie his fortitude in the active life but here is named Israel that is seeing God in respect of the contemplative life the which he had now atchived But there appeared no difference at all in the reason and signification of the name for as there by the name Israel hee is comforted and fortified against Esau so here against the Canaanites that thought to have revenged the slaughter of the Sichemites 4. Wherefore wee say that the same name upon the like occasion is here imposed and that this is but a repetition and confirmation of the other vision and thereupon Iacob being confident doth now more openly call himselfe Israel Mercer Iun. And so it is not unusuall in Scripture to have the same promises often repeated as those made to Abraham of the multiplying of his seed and possessing of the land of Canaan which were often revived and renewed as Gen. 15.17.22 Perer. QUEST VIII How it is said thy name shall bee no more called Iacob FVrther whereas the Lord saith thy name shall be no more called Iacob and yet hee is afterward called Iacob 1. Augustine thinketh that he was called Iacob in respect of this life onely where he should wrestle as his name signifieth with many temptations but hee was called Israel in respect of the life to come quast 114. in Gen. But this solution beeing mysticall and this mutation of Iacobs name historicall satisfieth not Much like is the solution of Tostatus that he was called Iacob in respect of his active life but Israel for his contemplative neither is this answer sufficient to say he should be called by both names but in a diverse sense for the text denieth unto him the name of Iacob any more 3. Nor yet doe wee approve the solution of Cajetan Vatab. that for vltra no more put in tantum thou shalt not onely be called Iacob for thus the text is forced 4. Pererius thus interpreteth not that he should be so much called by the name Israel as have the thing thereby signified as strength and power with God as it is said of Christ he should be called Emanuel that is God with vs yet was not Christ so called who was indeed God with vs But this sense is not so proper for Iacob was usually called by the name of Israel 5. Therefore the meaning is rather this that although the name of Iacob should remaine yet the last was more honourable and excellent and should obscure that other Muscul. Mercer 1. In respect of the author the name Iacob was given by men the name Israel by God 2. In signification it was more excellent Iacob signifieth a supplanter because hee held Esau by the heele but Israel is interpreted one that prevailed with God 3. The name Israel was given to the whole nation and posteritie of Iacob who of Israel were called Israelites not of Iacob Iacobites QUEST IX What Kings came out of Iacobs loynes Vers. 11. KIngs shall come out of thy loynes c. 1. The Hebrewes specially referre it to Saul and Isboseth that were Kings of Benjamin and to the tribes of Ephraim and Manasses 2. But because that Saul and his house were rejected of God and the kingdome of Israel was but an usurpation it is specially to be applied to David and the other kings of Iudah Calvin 3. It may also be understood of the kings of the Gentiles converted to the faith who spiritually were borne of Iacob Mercer 4. These nations that came out of Iacobs loynes were the twelve tribes that multiplied increased as so many seueral nations QUEST X. How the land of Canaan is given
Secondly Iacob putteth on sackcloth which was a ceremonie used in the East Countreyes to testifie their humility as Benhadads servants presented themselves before the King of Israel with sackcloth about their loines and ropes about their necks suing for pardon 1 King 20. Perer. QUEST XXVIII Who were those sonnes and daughters that comforted Iacob Vers. 35. THen all his sonnes and daughters rose up c. 1. These were not properly Iacobs daughters as the Hebrewes imagine that with every sonne Iacob had a daughter borne which they afterward married for such marriages the world being now multiplied were not in use among the faithfull Mercer 2. Neither could Iacobs sonnes the eldest not exceeding twenty foure or twenty five yeares not above seven yeares elder than Ioseph have daughters of that age able to comfort their father as Musculus thinketh they were therefore Iacobs sonnes wives that were his daughters in law 3. Neither did Iacob refuse to bee comforted because as the Hebrewes thinke where wee know certainly of the death of our friend we cease mourning but not where it is uncertaine whether they be dead or no for Iacob did perswade himselfe here that some wilde beast had devoured Ioseph but the greatnesse of his griefe would admit no consolation Mercer 4. We see the hard and cruell hearts of Iacobs sonnes that willingly did suffer their father to continue in this griefe and that with fained words they seemed to comfort him concealing the truth Luther 5. So it is added his father wept for him not Isaack who indeed was yet living as some thinke Aben Ezra Iun. But Iacob mourned for Ioseph his brethren mourned not but the father sorroweth for his sonne Muscul. QUEST XXIX Potiphar how he is said to be an Eunuch Vers. 36. TO Potiphar an Eunuch of Pharaohs 1. This Potiphar was not indeed an Eunuch or gelded man as the Septuag reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for he had a wife and a daughter married afterward to Ioseph 2. Neither for the same cause can that conceit of R. David have any likelihood that Potiphar was an Eunuch in part as retaining still the nerve or sinew though not the other instruments of generation 3. Neither is there any ground of that tradition of the Hebrewes that God caused Potiphars privie parts to wither and drie up because he thought to abuse faire Ioseph to his filthy lust 4. But whereas Eunuches were at the first used by Kings and Princes to wait upon their Queenes Esther 2.14 and so were as the Chamberlaines and neare unto their persons as Harbonah was to King Assuerus Esther 7.9 Hence the name of Eunuch was taken generally to signifie a Courtier Prince or great man toward the King as the word is used 2 King 8.6 The King commanded an Eunuch or one of his Princes to restore unto the Shunamite her lands and in this sense is Potiphar called an Eunuch that is one of Pharaos princes or courtiers as the word Saras signifieth sic Chal. Mercer Iun. with others QUEST XXX What officer Potiphar was to Pharao PHaraos chiefe Steward or master of the guard 1. For we neither reade with the Septuag Pharaos chiefe cooke although the word tabach be sometime used in that sense 1 Sam. 9.23 which reading Iosephus Philo and Ambrose follow 2. Neither yet was he Pharaos chiefe steward as some reade B.G. 3. Nor the chiefe captaine of his souldiers as both the Chalde and Hierome translate 4. But seeing the word tabach signifieth to kill and so the word is indifferently applyed both to Cookes and Butchers that are the slaughter men of beasts and to souldiers that kill men in battell and executioners that put men to death that are condemned by the law It appeareth that this Potiphar had the chiefe charge of those that were adjudged to imprisonment or death as Pharaos two officers his chiefe Baker and Butler were committed to his charge Gen. 40.3 and so may be well thought to be the chiefe Marshall or Captaine of the Guard unto Pharaoh Iunius Mercerus 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The father is as the Sunne and chiefe in the house Vers. 9. THe Sunne Moone and Stars did reverence unto me c. Ioseph by the Sunne and Moone understandeth his father and mother The father then of the house by Gods ordinance as the Sun from whom the wife as the Moone the children as Stars must receive their light and direction in every family Muscul. for the Apostle saith concerning wives If they will learne any thing let them aske of their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 and concerning the rest the same Apostle saith Having children under obedience with all honesty 1 Timoth. 3.4 2. Doct. The Prophets did not forsee all things but what was revealed unto them AGaine he dreamed c. Ioseph as Bernard well noteth did by the spirit of prophecie foresee his exaltation yet his humiliation and captivity was not declared unto him though this was nearer than the other tractat de gradib humilitat Whereby we see that the Prophets did not foresee all things neither had they a propheticall spirit residing with them whereby to foretell what they would but they onely knew those things which it pleased God to reveale unto them as the Prophet Ieremie at the first did not perceive the falshood of the Prophet Hananie that prophesied of their returne from captivity after two years but wished that it might fall out even so till the word of God came unto him Ier. 28.6.12 3. Doct. True obedience followeth not the words but the minde of the commander Vers. 7. IOseph went after his brethren and found them in Dothan c. Yet his father sent him onely to seeke them in Sechem vers 12. Ioseph sheweth his prompt obedience in not strictly tying himselfe to his fathers words but fulfilling his minde Iacob spake but of Sechem to Ioseph but he knowing that it was his meaning that hee should seeke out his brethren followeth after them to Dothan that hee might finde them out Muscul. by which example we are taught what kinde of obedience is most accepted with God not to keepe onely the letter of the law as the Scribes did whose corrupt glosses our Saviour confuteth Matth. 5. but to observe the true meaning and sense thereof 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. The Latine text corrupt and not justifiable Vers. 2. WHen Ioseph was seventeene yeares old The Latine text readeth most corruptly When Ioseph was sixteene yeare old which reading Perer. would justifie by these reasons 1. The Latine text understandeth sixteene yeares complete the Hebrewes seventeene yeares now but begun 2. He thinketh that the Latine translator set downe divers things whereof no reason can bee given not without the secret instinct of the spirit Pererius disput 1. in Gen. cap. 37. Contra. 1. It is the manner of the Hebrewes when they set downe a number of yeares to make the account by full and complete yeares as is manifest by the phrase here used
high Priest as the Hebrewes imagine for he died ten yeares before Iacob was borne who was now above 100. yeare old and therefore Melchisedeck could not have a daughter so young to beare children neither was this punishment arbitrary in Iudah and inflicted without law according to his pleasure Burgens for Iudah had no such authority there nor yet as Lyranus and Tostatus was she worthy of the fire because she had committed not simple fornication but adultery because she was by law obliged to the third brother and so in a manner espoused for it was not adultery for the widow of the brother to marrie with some other than the surviving brother else Naomi would never have advised her daughters in law to get them other husbands in their owne Countrey Ruth 1.9 But I rather thinke that Thamars adultery was in this that she had played the whore whereas Iudah had betrothed and espoused her to Selah and that Iudah who never was minded to give Selah to Thamar fearing lest he might die also as is evident vers 11. was very forward to take this occasion to be rid of Thamar that Selah might not marrie her 3. But herein appeareth Iudahs too much rigour and injustice that before the matter was examined gave sentence and was partiall the truth being knowne in his owne cause and further it was a savage part to put to death a woman great with childe which is contrary both to divine and humane lawes for it is written Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not bee put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but if Thamar had now died the infant had died with her The Romans had a law that the execution of a woman with childe should be deferred till she had brought forth the same also was practised among the Athenians Aeltan lib. 5. And therefore Claudius the Emperour is noted for his cruelty that spared not to put to death women with childe Perer. ex Dion lib. 57. QUEST XI Wherefore the Midwife useth a red threed and what colour it was of Vers. 28. THe midwife bound a red threed c. 1. It is so rather to be read than with Oleaster a twine or double threed the word sani here used commeth indeed of sanah that signifieth to double which is rather to be referred to the double die and colour than the double matter Iun. Tostatus also is much deceived here that taketh it not for a red but a blacke colour twice died ex Perer. 3. The Midwife tied this red threed as a marke of the first-borne because he first put forth his hand and the purple colour very well agreeth to the birth-right or eldership Muscul. QUEST XII Whence Pharez was so called and whereof he is a type Vers. 29. HOw hast thou broken thy breach upon thee 1. Hierome is deceived that of this word pharatz that signifieth to breake or divide thinketh the Pharises to have taken denomination whereas they had their name rather of Pharas which signifieth to disperse or separate because they were separate from other in profession of life and their apparell Mercer 2. This story hath bin diversly allegorized by the fathers some by Pharez understand the beleeving Gentiles by Zarah the Israelites and by the red threed their bloudy circumcision sacrifices sic Iren. Cyril Some contrariwise will have Phares to signifie the Jewes Zarah the beleeving Gentiles Chrysost. 3. But this Phares is more fitly a type and figure of Christ who hath broken downe the partition wall and hath broken the power of hell and death Mercer And by this strange and extraordinary birth the Lord would have Iudah and Thamar admonished of the sin which they had committed and to be humbled thereby though he in his mercie had forgiven it Calvin 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The difference betweene the apparelling of widowes and wives Vers. 14. SHe put her widowes garment off c. It seemeth that it was the use in those dayes for widowes to be knowne from wives by their mourning and grave apparell in which case more is permitted to women that are married whom the Apostle alloweth to adorne themselves with comely and sober apparell without pride or excesse 1 Timoth. 2.9 to please and content their husbands but widowes having no husbands to whose liking they should apparell themselves ought not to decke themselves to please other mens eyes Luther 2. Doct. Friendship ought alwayes to be joyned with pietie Vers. 20. IVdah sent a kid by the hand of his friend This Hâ—rah Iudahs friend did performe an evill office in being as it were a broker for Iudah who should neither have requested any dishonest or uncomely thing of his friend nor the other yeelded unto it love truth and piety ought not to be separated as Saint Iohn saith Whom I love in the truth Epist. 3.1 Muscul. 3. Doct. Adultery in former times punished by death Vers. 24. LEt her bee burnt We see that even among the Canaanites adultery was judged worthy of death for Iudah inventeth no new kinde of punishment but speaketh according to the law and custome of that Countrey So the Lord himselfe said to Abimelech that had taken Sarai unto him Behold thou art but a dead man for this c. Gen. 20.3 Now although this law as peculiar to that Countrey bindeth not now neither in respect of the kinde of death for by Moses law onely the Priests daughter if she played the whore was burned Levit. 21.9 the rest were stoned nor yet in the inequality of the law for the women offending were burned the men escaped as appeareth in Iudah Calvin whereas both adulterers and adulteresses are alike guilty and though then there was greater cause of keeping their seed uncorrupt for preserving of their lives and the distinction of families in which respect it may be thought somewhat of the former rigour and severity may be abated yet this example condemneth the security and connivence of magistrates in these dayes in the punishing of this sinne when as faults of lesse nature are more severely censured than adultery And whereas the president of our Saviour is urged by some for the mitigation of the punishment of adultery because he would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie it doth not serve their turne for this mercie Christ shewed not to cleare or exempt the adulteresse leaving her to the magistrate but partly to shew that he came not to be a judge in such causes as neither in other like businesses as dividing of the inheritance Luk. 12.14 partly by this example he would teach what is to be required in the person of an accuser not to bee guilty of that crime whereof he accuseth others 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That it is not lawfull upon any occasion to marrie the brothers wife Vers. 8. GOe into thy brothers wife Because in this place as also Deut. 25.5 it is permitted to naturall brethren to marry the wives of their brother deceased
v. 2. And the word of God was an helpe to Ioseph C. and the Lord was with Ioseph cat v. 4. And he pleased him S. served or ministred to him cat sheretâ—â— to minister v. 6. Heleft all he had in Iosephs hand cat only the Latine wanteth this clause he knew nothing else H. he knew nothing with himselfe that is which hee had S. P. he tooke account of nothing with him G. hee knew nothing with him C. T. so also the Heb. v. 7. After many daies H. after these words S.P. C. after this B. after these things G.T. heb dabar a word a thing Sleepe with mee H. S. lie with me v. 9. There is nothing in the house which is not in my power H. there is not in this house S. there is none in the house greater than I. G. B. hee himselfe is not greater in the house than I. C.T. heb v. 10. He refused to commit adulterie H. he would not sleepe with her that he might lie with her S. he consented not to lie with her or be in her companie caeter v. 11. Ioseph entered the house to examine his accounts C. to doe some businesse caet v. 13. When she saw c. that she was despised H. that he was fled out caet v. 16. For a proofe of the matter the cloake laid up she shewed to her husband returning home H. she laid up the garment with her till her husband came home caeter v. 17. And said let mee sleepe with thee S. the rest have not this clause v. 19. Giving too much credit to the words of his wife H. when he heard the words of his wife which she told him saying after this manner did thy servant to me caet v. 20. Hee cast him into prison S. into the place of munition or strong place S. into the prison house G.B.P. into the round tower T. sahar a round tower v. 22. Whatsoever was there done was under him H. whatsoever they did there that did hee caet 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. The meaning of their words saving of the bread which he did eat Vers. 6. HE tooke account of nothing saving only of the bread c. 1. This is neither to bee understood of Ioseph that hee had no other reward for all his service at his Masters hand but the bread which he did eat for it is not like that his Master would deale so hardly with him having committed all to his charge 2. Neither by this phrase is expressed Iosephs parsimonie and sparing diet that hee would not eat of Potiphars delicates yet was faire and well-favoured as the like wee read of Daniel Dan. 1. For this clause is to be referred to Potiphar not to Ioseph saving only of the bread which hee did eat 3. And yet wee refuse the conceit of R. Salomon who by bread here understandeth Potiphars wife for that is a forced and improper sense 4. Neither with Aben Ezra doe wee so expound it as though Ioseph was excluded from medling with his masters meat and drink because it was an abomination to the Egyptians to eat with the Hebrewes for it is said before vers 4. that Ioseph found favour in his Masters sight and served him that is waited and attended upon his person 5. Wherefore the meaning is no more but this that Potiphar freely committed the whole charge to Ioseph taking no account of him but was secure and cared for nothing hee did only eat and drinke and take such things as were provided for him without any more care Mercer Iun. QUEST II. How long Ioseph served in Potiphars house Vers. 7. AFter these things c. 1. The Latine translation readeth after many yeares which although it be true yet it is not agreeable to the words of the text 2. Ioseph spent many yeares in Potiphars house for first he was as a common servant in his Masters house vers 2. Then his master having a great liking of him made him one of his owne ministers or servants to attend his owne person vers 4. Lastly hee made him ruler of his house Iunius 3. It should seeme then that Ioseph served 10. or 11. yeares in Potiphars house before hee was cast into prison from the 17. yeare of his age till hee was 27. he might be three yeare in prison for two yeares after that the chiefe Butler was set at libertie Pharaoh dreamed Gen. 4.2 And Ioseph for expounding his dreame was advanced being then 30. yeare old Gen. 41.46 Mercer Perer. QUEST III. What stayed Ioseph from committing this great sinne Vers. 9. HOw can I doe this great wickednesse and sinne against God 1. Like as the wicked accustomed to doe evill cannot doe that which is good as is said of Iosephs brethren that they could not speake peaceably unto him Genes 37.4 So the righteous established by the grace of God cannot doe evill not in respect of their free-will which by nature is prone enough to evill but because Gods grace stayeth them so that they cannot doe it because they know they ought not Perer. 2. Three things stay Ioseph from committing this sinne the feare of God the love of his Master and his liberalitie toward him and the dutie of the wife toward her husband Mercer 3. Three things in respect of God ought to keepe us from sinning 1. The reverence of his Majestie which seeth and beholdeth all things 2. The consideration of his mercie and benefits received 3. The feare of his judgements Perer. QUEST IIII. Of Iosephs invincible chastitie Vers. 12. HE left his garment in her hand and fled c. 1. Forraine histories make honorable mention of divers famous for their chastitie as Aeltanus of Amabaeus the harper that having a most beautifull wife yet abstained from her and of Diogenes the Tragicall-writer that did the like Valerius Maximus writeth of one Spurima a faire young man who of purpose disfigured and mangled his face because he would not be desired of women and of Hippon a woman of Greece that cast her selfe into the sea to save her chastitie But chaste and constant Ioseph farre exceedeth them all 2. For being in his youthfull yeeres when lust most rageth of the age of 27. and often sollicited and of no meane woman but of the ladie of the house he could neither be intised by her promises nor overcome by her threats as it is like shee did threaten to accuse him falsely to her husband and so seeke his death neither the opportunitie or secrecie of the place could move him for Potiphar and all his servants were absent in solemnizing some festivall day and his wife staied at home fayning her selfe sicke as Iosephus conjectureth neither the impudencie of the woman that laied violent hands upon him and strugled a good while with him till the servants were returned could conquer his chastitie 3. Hee was not therefore so faire without as he was faire and comely within pulchriâ—r in luce
gift requiring this as a reward and recompence for this good tidings But by this he sheweth the certaintie of the Butlers good successe and favour with the King that if he made but mention of him to Pharaoh he might be delivered neither doth he aske this as a reward but taketh this occasion to do himselfe good for it is lawfull for a man to use all honest meanes for his libertie as the Apostle saith Art thou called being a servant care not for it yet if thou canst be free use it rather 1 Cor. 7.21 Calvin 3. It may be that Ioseph was some what too confident upon this meanes as though this were the way that God had appointed for his deliverance and therefore God would exercise Iosephs patience still so that Ioseph failed not in diffidence and distrust in betaking himselfe to the meanes but rather herein that he limiteth Gods providence both for the meanes and the time that even now and by this meanes he hasteth to be delivered Calvin Mercer QUEST IIII. How Ioseph is said to be stollen away Vers. 15. I Was stolen away by theft out of the land of the Hebrewes 1. This theft was not committed by the Ismaelites who bought Ioseph for their money but by his owne bretheren who committed a theft two waies both because they sold a freeman not taken in battel nor brought into bondage which by Moses Law was punished with death Exod. 21.16 and in that they did robbe their father of his child Perer. 2. Hebron is not here meant by the land of the Hebrews as Ramban because that was the principall place of abode for Abraham Isaack and Iacob but the land of Canaan is thus called where the Hebrewes dwelt which Ioseph so calleth rather than Canaan because he abhorred to be counted of that nation Mercer QUEST V. How the chiefe Baker his head is said to be lifted up 〈◊〉 leavied Vers. 19. WIthin three daies Pharaoh shall take thine head from thee or leavie thine head off from thee c. 1. Iunius readeth thus Pharaoh numbering thee shall cause theâ— no more to be numbered and hee referreth it as before to the removing or taking away of his pegge which he taketh for his head out of his hole or place in the table but this seemeth to be too curious 2. Neither with some other doe I thinke that the chiefe Baker was beheaded for the text saith he was hanged upon a tâ—ee which needed not if he were first beheaded 3. Some make the meaning of the phrase to be this that Pharaoh would take away his life from him and the Latines say capite plecti to lose the head that is to be put to death hence they are called capitall crimes that are punished by the losse of the head or life Mercer 4. The most reade shall take thine head from thee but he was hanged not beheaded 5. Some thinke he was first beheaded and then hanged as the manner is yet in some countries Osiand But in that the Butlers head was lift up as well as the Bakers vers 20. this phrase doth not shew his punishment for then the effect vers 20. should not answer to the prophecie 6. Some understand it of his hanging that his head was lift up upon him as our Saviour calleth his hanging upon the crosse his exaltation or lifting up Ioh. 3.14 Pellican But this cannot be the meaning because the same phrase is used both of the Butler and Baker 7. This therefore is the sense that Pharaoh should lift up his head aloft out of prison and cause his name to be rehearsed and so his head to be leavied among the rest of his servants and take cognizance of both their causes but the one he should hang and restore the other So Ioseph doth foretell unto them three things whereof the first the leavying of the head and examining their cause is common to them both the other two things are peculiar to either the Butler shall be restored to his office and minister the cup to the King vers 13. the Baker shall be put from his office and no more reckoned or leavied among the officers and be hanged this then is the true reading of the words Pharaoh shall leavie thine head from upon thee that is that no more leavying or reckoning be made upon thee which words may be supplied by the contrarie vers 13. and the exposition of the praeposition ghal used there to thine office and mâ—ghal from off expressed here doe insinuate as much so also the same word meghaleca from off thee is used in the end of this verse and Deut. 8.4 Thy garments 〈◊〉 not waxe old from off thee that is to be no more upon thee and so to be used by thee QUEST VI. Whether Ioseph used any preamble to his interpretation Vers. 19. THe birds shall eat thy flesh 1. It is like that Ioseph being to deliver so hard an interpretation of the Bakers dreame did use some preface to excuse himselfe as Philo bringeth him in thus speaking Vtinam tale somnium non vidisses c. I would thou hadst either not seene this dreame or not declared it to me and it is not unlike but that Ioseph used some such preparation as Daniel did when he was to expound Nebuchadnezzars dreame The dreame be to them that hate thee and the interpretation thereof to thine enemies Dan. 4.16 2. This hanging of malefactors upon a tree seemeth to have beene an ancient punishment and it was counted a most ignominious death and therefore Saint Paul setteth forth the great humilitie of Christ that humbled himselfe even to the death of the crosse Philip. 2. The Latine translator readeth he shall hang thee on the crosse which kinde of death was used also among the Romanes as Tully saith Facinus est vincire civem Romanum scelus verberare quid dicam in crucem tollerâ— It is a great offence to binde a Citizen of Rome a greater to beat him the greatest to set him on the Crosse Cicer. Verrem 7. 3. Such as were hanged to death among the Israelites by the law were to be taken downe and buried the same day Deut. 21.23 But it seemeth that this use was not observed among the Gentiles but their bodies did hang to be meat to the fowles of the ayre Perer. which may be noted as a great judgement of God when the Lord suffereth his owne image in man to be so defaced and his flesh to be given for meat to the fowles and beasts whose flesh is appointed to be mans food as the Lord threatned against Ieroboam and his house that they which died in the Citie should be eaten of dogges they which died in the fields should be devoured of the fowles of heaven 1 King 14.11 Muscul. QUEST VII Whether lawfull to keepe the memorie of the birth-day Vers. 20. PHaraohs birth-day 1. This was a very ancient custome to celebrate the birth-daies of Kings and Princes both among the Medes and Persians as witnesseth Xenophon
also the preeminence and principalitie over other tribes 2. Some thinke that Zerubbabel of Iudah and his posteritie had the princely authoritie till Herod Cyrill lib. 8. cont Iulian. Contra. 1. The histories of that nation as is extant in Iosephus doe testifie the contrarie that the chiefe government was in the Machabees and their line which were of Levi Aristobulus sonne of Hircanus the sonne of Simeon was the first Levite that bare a crowne and it continued in his race untill Herod 2. We want not sufficient evidence for this is in the Scripture for the prophet saith concerning Ieconiah that none of his seed should sit upon the throne of Dauid Ierem. 22.30 in him the regall line of Iudah ended 3. A third opinion is that the high priests after the captivitie were of Iudah by the mother side as Iehoiada the priest married Iehoshabeath sister to Ahaziah the King 2 Chron. 22.11 sic Tâ—status some say further that they were also of the tribe of Iudah by the fathers side and by this meanes the scepter did not depart from Iudah Contra. 1. It is uncertaine whether the high priests did alwaies take their wives out of the tribe of Iudah though some did nay it is more probable they did not 2. Though they did yet could they not be said to be of the tribe of Iudah for the tribes were counted by the fathers side not the mothers 3. And by this meanes it should be rather true of Levi that the scepter should not depart from him than of Iudah 4. Neither will it satisfie to say the high priests were of Iudah by the fathers side for then the Machabees might have challenged the kingdome by inheritance whereas it came to them by election as Ionathan was chosen by consent of the people in the place of Iudas 1. Mach. 9.31 and beside the Apostle witnesseth that never any of the tribe of Iudah had the office of the priesthood Heb. 7.14 but Mattathias was a priest 1 Mach. 2.1 and therefore not of Iudah 4. Cajetanus answereth that the scepter was taken away quoad actum in act but not quoad spem in hope but still they were in expectation that the kingdome should be restored in the Messiah Contra. This answer is not sufficient 1. Because Iacob speaketh of the visible and terrene kingdome annexed to Iudah whereof there was no hope to have it restored as the prophet Ieremie saith of Iâ—conias that none of his seed should sit upon the throne of David Ierem. 22. and yet the Messiah came of Ieconiah his kingdome was therefore spirituall 2. By this interpretation this place which we urge against the Jewes to prove that the Messiah is come should want his force seeing they might also answer that the kingdome of Iudah is onely ceased and intermitted in act but not in hope to be restored 5. Canus lib. 2. de loc theolog hath found out this answer that the tribe of Iudah had not lost the scepter quoad jus in respect of their right though quoad usum in regard of the use it might bee administred by other tribes and to this purpose hee alleageth that place 1 Machab. 14.41 How the Iewes and priests consented that Simeon should bee their prince and high priest perpetually till the Lord raised up the true Prophet where the men of Iudah surrender their right to Simeon Contra. 1. True it is that the right of the kingdome appertained to Iudah and neither could the tribe of Iudah give it to any other tribe nor they take it and therefore it is well observed that the Machabees and their posteritie were justly punished of God as usurpers first in being perverted with the wicked sect of Sadduces for Ioannes Hircanus the sonne of Simon was a Saducee and put many of the pharises to death so did his sonne Alexander who slew 50000. Pharises secondly they were dispossessed of their crowne and dignitie by Antipater their servant and his sonne Herod 2. Yet this cannot bee the meaning of this prophecie for then wee could not conclude out of this place against the Iewes that the Messiah is come seeing they may also answer that the scepter is not gone from Iudah yet quoad jus in respect of the right and therefore they may yet expect the Messiah Iacob therefore must be understood to speake of a reall and visible principalitie in Iudah which should not cease till Messiah was to come and the ceasing thereof should be taken as a manifest argument of the approaching of the Messiah 6. Wherefore seeing it is manifest that the scepter and princely government did not really remaine in the tribe of Iudah till the comming of the Messiah for Ezechiel thus prophesieth of the kingdome of Iudah Thus saith the Lord I will take away the diademe and take off the crowne it shall be no more the same c. I will overturne overturne overturne it till hee come whose right it is and I will give it him Ezech. 21.26 27. And so indeed the government after the captivitie was thrice turned and changed first they had captaines as Zerubbabel for their chiefe governours then the high Priests last of all Kings Seeing I say that the reall and actuall principalitie and regiment of Iudah ceased not long after theâ—r returne out of captivitie as the Prophet Amos saith In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen downe chap. 9.11 And seeing further that it sufficeth not that the princely regiment remained still in the tribe of Iudah in hope or in right for the Iewes might answer us that it so remaineth still therefore this prophecie can receive no other sense or interpretation than one of these foure waies which I will set downe with the approbation of the best 1. Some by Iudah understand not the tribe of Iudah only but the whole nation of the Iewes both because although there were of the tribes of Levi and Benjamin among them yet the whole Common-wealth had the name of Iudah and the Kingdome was in the tribe lot and territorie that appertained to Iudah and therefore it may fitly bee called the scepter of Iudah though it might bee usurped by some not of the tribe of Iudah and in this sense it is true that the Iewes had alwaies a King and governour of their owne nation untill Herod an Idumaean invaded the regall dignitie in the 30. yeare of whose reigne Shiloh the Messiah was borne Pererius who alleageth Eusebius histor lib. 1. cap. 6. August lib. 18. de civit Dei c. 45. Rupertus lib. 9. in Gen. c. 29. as authors and fautors of this opinion This interpretation might well bee received but that it seemeth by Iacobs severall prophecies of his sonnes that hee meaneth particularly the tribe of Iudah and such as should be borne of that tribe for so is the meaning of that phrase from betweene his feet and seeing Iacob had said before thy brethren shall praise thee thy fathers sonnes shall bow unto thee meaning
of him 7. Iosephus is here deceived that Iosephs brethren refused to returne into Egypt with him but that hee gently intreated them for all this was done after that they were returned QUEST XI In what sense Ioseph saith am I God Vers. 19. AM I in Gods stead c. 1. Some doe read Am not I under God and make this sense if God be ready to forgive much more I. 2. Some I doe feare God or I am Gods S.C. therefore I will not seeke to revenge 3. But the best reading is Am I in Gods stead with an interrogation not without as Cajetane readeth I am in Gods stead that is I follow Gods will and sentence I looke not to your evill intent the word thacath signifieth both pro for and sometime it is a note of subjection but here it is taken in the first sense 4. The meaning then of these words Am I God is not 1. either that they should aske God forgivenesse and not him 2. or that he committed his revenge to God for hee thought of no revenge 3. or that he would not have them to worship him as God for he had divers times before received that reverence at their hands 4. neither doth he by this meanes excuse their fault because he referreth all to Gods will 5. But the meaning is that seeing God had turned their evill counsell against him to his good and theirs and of many beside he would not for his part be the man that should turne it to revenge Calvin Mercer and so the Latine Interpreter doth hit the sense though not the words can I resist Gods will Iacob after the same manner said to Rachel that said give me children am I God Gen. 30.2 that is it is not in my power to give thee children so here Ioseph saith am I God it is not in my power to hurt you whom the Lord intendeth by this meanes to blesse Iun. QUEST XII The computation of Iosephs age Vers. 22. IOseph lived an hundred and ten yeeres 1. Thus God recompenced Iosephs short affliction which endured 13. yeeres from the 17. yeere not from the 16. as Pererius saith following the corrupt Latine text of his age to the 30. when he stood before Pharaoh with a long time of prosperity for the space of 80. yeeres that is from the 30. yeere to the 110. yeares for so long he lived 2. Yet attained not Ioseph to the yeeres of his father which were 147. and some of his brethren overlived him as Levi who lived 137. yeares Exod. 6.16 nhether Ioseph dyed first of all his brethren as Pererius thinketh it is uncertaine the great affliction and hard imprisonment in his youth the cares and troubles of the government and administration of the kingdome might be some reason of the shortning of his dayes Perer. 3. This then was the age of Ioseph hee was 17. yeares old when he was sold into Egypt Gen. 37.2 at 30. yeares he stood before Pharaoh Gen. 41.46 he was 49. yeares old when Iacob came into Egypt for the seven yeares of plenty were then past and two of famine Gen. 45.6 at Iacobs death who lived 17. yeares in Egypt Gen. 47.28 he was 56. yeares old and 54. yeares he lived after which make 110. in all 4. By this age of Ioseph it may appeare how long hee dyed before Moses was borne namely 64. yeares and 144. yeares before the departure of Israel out of Egypt as may be thus gathered from the promise made to Abraham to the going out of Israel are 430. yeares Exod. 12.40 Galat. 3.17 of this time 215. yeares were run when Iacob came downe to Egypt for Abraham was 75. yeares old when the promise was first made Gen. 12.4 Isaack was borne when Abraham was 100. yeares old Gen. 17.17 Isaack at 60. had Esau and Iacob borne Gen. 25.26 Iacob at 130. came downe to Egypt Gen. 48.9 these yeares put together 25. of Abrahams age 60. of Isaacks 130. of Iacobs make 215. exactly there remaineth then the other halfe of 215. of the which time Ioseph lived 71. yeares for he was 49. when Iacob came downe to Egypt and lived 110. yeares there remaineth then 144. yeares take from this 80. yeares for so old was Moses when Israel went out of Egypt and the remnant is 64. from Iosephs death to Moses birth 5. Here appeareth Tostatus errour that would have 66. yeares from the death of Ioseph till Moses and 146. from thence to Israels departure wherein he faileth in 2. yeares But Iustinus the historiographer is in a greater error who would have Moses to be Iosephs son lib. 36. and in the same place he hath other untruths as that Ioseph was his fathers youngest sonne that his brethren sold him for the excellency of his wit whereas they did it of malice that he got his skill of interpreting dreames by art magicke whereas the Magitians and wise-men of Egypt could not do it but he by the spirit of God was enabled thereunto ex Perer. QUEST XIII How many generations Ioseph saw of Ephraim Vers. 23. IOseph saw Ephraims children to the third generation 1. Thus most doe read that Ioseph onely saw Ephraims childrens childrens children in the third descent from Ephraims proâ—epotes his grand-nephewes which were abâ—epotes to Ioseph nephewes in the fourth degree but of Manasseh he saw onely his childrens children so that Manasseh was only a grand-father Ephraim a great grand-father while Ioseph lived so that Ephraim was forwarder in his posterity than Manasseh by one descent 2. But I rather thinke that Ioseph saw Ephraims children in the fourth generation from Ephraim in the fift from himselfe 1. Because they are called in the originall the sonnes of the third namely from Ephraim the sons of the third are in the fourth generation and so Iunius translateth well abnepotes that is nephewes in the fourth descent 2. Because we finde that Ephraim though younger than Manasseh exceeded him by two descents for Iosuah was the seventh from Ephraim who was the sonne of Nun the son of Elishama of Ammihud of Hadan of Shutelah of Ephraim 1 Chron. 7.26 27. But Zelophehad who lived with Iosua and dyed in the wildernesse of Hepher of Gilead of Machir of Manasseh was but the fift from Manasseh Numb 29.1 Therefore when Ioseph saw the sonnes of Machir of Manasseh in the second degree from Manasseh he might see Elishama in the fourth descent from Ephraim and thus Iacobs prophecie more fully tooke effect even in Iacobs time that Ephraim should be greater in number than Manasseh QUEST XIV The meaning of this phrase to be brought up upon the knee Vers. 23. WEre brought up on Iosephs knees The Scripture useth three phrases of this kinde 1. As to come from betweene the feet which is taken for education and bringing up Genâ—s 49.10 though sometime it be specially applied to the birth of women Deuter. 28.57 2. They are said to beare upon his knees that is to receive the children newly borne and
post poenitentiam That he which committed adulterie after publike penance should finally be denied the Communion In Hieromes time it seemeth that adulterie was punished by death who in a certaine epistle maketh mention of a young man qui adulterâ—i insimulatus ad mortem trahitur who being accused of adultery was led forth to death yet Augustine as is shewed before reasoneth against it but of all other Origen writeth most plainly Apud Christianos si adulterium fuerit admissum c. Among Christians if adulterie be committed it is not commanded that the adulterer or adulteresse bee punished with corporall death c. neither therefore was the law cruell then neither now doth the Gospell seeme to bee dissolute but in them both the benignitie of God appeareth yet by a divers dispensation then by the death of the bodie the people was rather purged from their sinnes than condemned but unto us sinne is purged not by corporall punishment but by repentance and it is to be seene unto lest our punishment be greater whose vengeance is laid up for the next world when as they were absolved from their sinne by the paying of the punishment as the Apostle saith how much more punishment is he worthy of that treadeth under foote the Sonne of God Two reasons Origen yeeldeth of this his opinion that there is now a mitigation of the rigour of Moses law because then it served as an expiation of their sinnes prefiguring the death of Christ as S. Paul applieth that sentence Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree which is generally delivered by Moses to the particular death of Christ Galat. 3.13 but now the expiation of sinne is by repentance and remission of sinnes in Christ. Againe now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospell even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now for God punisheth not twice for the same thing as Origen in the same place alleageth Yet although we contend that the capitall punishment of Moses law may now be dispensed with in some cases upon the reasons before alleaged this is not either to condemne those Common-wealths which doe reteine still and practise the severity of Moses law against adulterers who therein sinne not but as Ambrose saith of the Apostles that asked for fire to come downe upon the Samaritanes Nec discipuli peccant legem sequentes Yet did not the Disciples offend following the law neither to excuse those places where this sinne is too easily and lightly punished as Erasmus complaineth in his time Nunc adulterium lusus magnatum est Now adulterie is but a sport of great men Where adulterie is not capitally punished yet great severity otherwise should be used as it was decreed in the Elibâ—rin Councell that he which having a wife committed adulterie should be under penance five yeeres can 〈◊〉 He that did sinne that way after should not bee received to the peace of the Church till his dying 〈…〉 that did commit adulterie after penance should never be restored to the communion of the Chuâ—â—â— c. 7. These or such like severe constitutions this wanton and lascivious age hath need of that this overflowing sinne might be kept in with higher bankes than now it is So then I conclude this point with Cyprian who speaking of divers kindes of Ecclesiasticall censure used in divers places thus writeth Manente concordia vinculo actum suum disponit dirigit unusquisque Episcopus c. The bond of amity remaining still every Bishop so directeth and disposeth his owne act that he is thereof to give account unto God The like may bee said of Princes and Magistrates in their dominions and regiments that the difference in publike punishments all intending the glorie of God and the brideling of sinne is no cause to breake peace or breede jelousie betweene Christian states Now for the other part that Moses Judicials doe bind negatively that is where Moses Law inflicteth not death there Christian Magistrates are not to punish with death the reasons are these 1. Because then the regiment of the Gospell should exceed in terror the strictnesse and severitie of Moses Law 2. God is that one Lawgiver that saveth life and destroyeth Iam. 4.12 he gave life and he only hath right to take it away God hath created man in his image Gen. 9.6 which image is expressed in mans soule animating the bodie This image then is not to be defaced and dissolved but by warrant and direction from God therefore the equitie of the Judicials of Moses ought to be a rule either by generall direction or particular president to all Magistrates in what cases and for what sinnes they are to deprive the offendors of their life But here it will be objected that if this be so then all those Common-wealths are in error which punish theft by death which by Moses law is satisfied by making restitution Exod. 22.2 Ans. Even by Moses law some kinde of theft received a capitall punishment as if it were a violent theft as it was lawfull to kill a theefe breaking into the house Exodâ—s 22.2 or a wanton theft as David judged him worthy to dye that having many sheepe of his owne tooke by violence the onely sheepe which his poore neighbour had 2. Sam. 12.5 Likewise publike theft and sacrilege in Achan was punished by death Iosh. 7. But that simple theft when a man stealeth only to satisfie his hungrie soule or to supply his present necessitie should be proceeded against to the losse of life it seemeth hard And as I take it the lawes of this land have used a good consideration herein that such small felons should escape by their booke wherein to my understanding greater clemencie and favour in some Judges were more commendable who require an exactnesse of such simple clerkes unlesse they bee such as are worthy for other former evill demerits to be cut off as rotten members There is a saying in the law Favores sunt ampliandi Where favour is intended it should be the largest way extended It were also to be wished that a greater valuation were yet set than of the usuall rate in such small fellonies when a man is to bee judged for his life By Dioclesians law some kindes of theft are charged with restitution of foure fold by another authentike law the theefe is adjudged to bee beaten with clubbes By the Decrees Qui fecâ—rit furtum capitale c. Hee that committed any capitall theft as in breaking into an house in stealing a beast or some other thing of price if he were a Clergie man he was to be under penance seven yeeres if a lay man five if it were a small theft he was to make restitution and to doe penance one yeere By any of these or the like constitutions sufficient provision might be made against simple theft But it can no wayes be justified that such simple theft should bee more straightly
are in his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1
upon every occasion 6. This darknesse did shew the spirituall darknesse of their soules and was a forerunner of the everlasting darknesse of hell which waited for them Ferus For the mysticall application of this Egyptian darknesse 1. Origen doth expound it of the unsearchable and impenetrable depth of the divine providence Augustine doth accommodate and applie it to the tenth Commandement Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife for such he saith are palpably blinded even as the Egyptians were 2. But more fitly doth the same Origen applie it to signifie the blindnesse of the Egyptians and the darknesse of their superstitious minde that were ignorant of the true knowledge and worship of God giving themselves to most filthie Idolatrie and it betokeneth also the grosse darknesse wherein the Gentiles were buried before they were called to the knowledge of the Messiah all the world was then in darknesse onely in Israel was light and the knowledge of God But contrariwise in the passion of Christ it was darke among the Jewes and light elsewhere which signified that light was sprung up to the Gentiles and blindnesse fallen upon the Jewes 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. The law is to be preached to the obstinate Vers. 4. IF thou refuse to let them goe behold to morrow I will bring Locusts Moses to Pharaoh being an obstinate and impenitent man preacheth nothing but the law and judgement the Gospell is not to bee preached to such but onely to the broken hearted as Christ saith That the spirit of God was upon him to preach the Gospell to the poore Luk. 4.18 This was a signe betweene the true Prophets and false that these alwayes cried to the people peace peace but the other told the people of their sinnes Ferus 2. Doct. The difference betweene the children of God and the children of the world Vers. 23. ALl the children of Israel had light where they dwelt In this difference betweene the children of Israel and the Egyptians is shadowed forth the divers estate betweene the children of God and the children of this world the one are lightned with the knowledge of grace the other sit downe in the region of darknesse and shadow of death as the Apostle saith Yee are all the children of the light and the children of the day we are not of the night nor of darknesse 1 Thess. 5.5 Borrh. 5. Places of confutation 1. Conf. That children are the members of the Church against the Anabaptists Vers. 9. WE will goe with our young and with our old with our sonnes and with our daughters Both young and old belonged unto Israel and to the Church of God which maketh against the Anabaptists that count infants no members of the Church and therefore denie them to be baptised But the Psalmist exhorteth not onely the ancient to praise God but the young also Young men and maidens old men and children Psalm 48.12 Ferus 2. Conf. Ignorance and darknesse not to be found in the Church of Christ but among the Egyptians Vers. 23. BVt all the children of Israel had light where they dwelt This externall light betokeneth the spirituall light of knowledge that the true Israel hath the light and knowledge of God It hath beene held as a principle among the Romanists and their practice sheweth them to bee of the same mind still that ignorance is the mother of devotion And great hath beene the ignorance and darknesse which reigned many yeeres under the Kingdome of Antichrist Borrh. And out of the darke smoke of the bottomlesse pit this mistie darknesse have come forth all those swarmes of Locusts Monkes Friers Masse Priests Seminaries whose endevour is to sow â—rror among the people and to settle them in ignorance of the truth to which purpose they forbid the Scriptures to be read or prayers to be said but in the Latin tongue they permit them not to read any books which may instruct them in the truth to sing Psalmes to conferre or reason of their faith All this sheweth that they would still keepe theirs in the Egyptian darknesse But thanks be unto God that hath caused the light of the Gospell of his Sonne to shine upon his Israel in this land that now that prophesie may be verified againe of this land which is also by the way of the Sea The people that sate in darknesse have seene great light and to them that sate in the region and shadow of death light is raised up Matth. 4.15 16. 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Of the necessity of good education Vers. 3. THat thou mayst declare in the eares of thy sonne Hence appeareth the necessitie of the good education of children that they should be instructed in the feare of the Lord in their youth and so will they not forget it when they are old Ferus This is the Apostles counsell that the fathers should bring up their children in the instruction and information of the Lord Ephes. 6.3 The want of good instruction in the youth is the cause of the licentiousnesse and unthriftinesse of the young men of this age 2. Mor. The departure of the Ministers of God dangerous Vers. 6. SO he turned him and went out from Pharaoh This sudden departure of Moses from Pharaoh and with indignation did foreshew the fearefull condition of Pharaoh whom the Ministers and Prophets of God forsake It was an evident argument of destruction at hand So their case is hard that are left destitute of the Ministers of Gods word Worldly men consider not this nay they many times wish in their hearts that there were not a Minister to speake unto them But like as the Jewes state was desperate when the Apostles left them and shooke off the dust of their feet against them Act. 13.51 so it fareth with those that are deprived of the presence of Gods Ministers Ferus 3. Mor. The office and part of good counsellers Vers. 7. THen Pharaohs servants said unto him It is the part of good counsellers to perswade Kings and Princes to deale well with the servants of God and to move them to the good of the Church and common-wealth Piscator Not to flatter the Prince to make themselves great or to deale unfaithfully and onely to seeke themselves as Shebna did Isai. 22. but to be like the faithfull Eliakâ—â— and as Ebedmelech that obtained favour for Ieremie 4. Mor. Not one jot of Gods word to be omitted Vers. 26. THere shall not be an hoofe left In those things which God hath prescribed and commanded noâ— the least thing is to be omitted Moses was charged to make all things belonging to the Tabernacle even to the snuffers and ashpans according to the paterne which the Lord shewed him in the mount Exod. 25.9 Simler So not one jot of the word of God must be left undone but it must be kepâ— exactly to an haires breadth as wee say CHAP. XI 1. The method and Argument IN this Chapter there is a continuation of the narration of Moses
light but made not darkenesse but onely made a separation betweene the light and the darknesse Gen. 14. Whereupon Augustine groundeth this distinction Aliud fecit Deus ordinavit aliud non fecit sed ordinavit God mâ—dâ— sâ—me things and ordered them also some things he made not but ordered as he giveth instance of the darknesse so the workes of darknesse God cannot be said to have made but only he disposeth and ordereth them QUEST XXVII God otherwise hardneth then as a generall mover of the heart THirdly some referre that worke of God which he sheweth in the hardning of the heart to that generall power which he giveth unto the creature in whom all things move live and have their being Act. 17.28 So that the hardning of the heart as it is an action or worke is of God but as it is evill it proceedeth from man So Zuinglius Quatenus est Dei Creatoris opus est crimen non est quantum autem hominis crimen est scelus est As it is of God the Creator it is a worke it is no faule but as it is of man it is a fault it is a sinne The Master of the sentences hath the like saying Actus mali in quantum actus 〈◊〉 boni sunt à Deo authore Evill acts as they are acts are good and proceed of God the Author lib. 2. distinct 35. But this solution doth not take away the doubt for as God is the Creator and so generall worker hee only giveth power to move the heart this moving being the generall action is divided into two parts for there are good motions of the heart and evill the mollifying of the heart and the hardning in the good motions God concurreth two wayes as a generall mover by his creating power and as a particular directer by his regenerating grace but in the other motions he only hath a stroke as a generall mover in the particular action of hardning as it is evill hee concurreth not Therefore according to that generall power the Lord is said only to be a mover not an hardner of the heart Some other way therefore yet must be found out whereby the Lord is said to harden the heart QUEST XXVIII How the Lord is said indeed to harden the heart TO conclude then this question of all these wayes before rehearsed which are ten in all I make choice of these three which may fully satisfie every doubt namely the third in the 17. quest before the fift in the 20. quest and the sixt in the 21. The first is that God is said to harden the heart by leaving it to it selfe and depriving it of his necessary grace as God is said to have given over the unbeleeving Gentiles to their hearts lusts Rom. 1.24 The second that beside this God causeth many things to be done which are not in themselves causes of the hardning of the heart yet the wicked take occasion thereby further to bee indurate and hardned as S. Paul sheweth how the wicked abuse the patience and long suffering of God thereby to be further hardned Thirdly God by his just judgement Cum suum in malum quâ— ipse ultro ruit amplius ad finem usque impellit doth force him to his owne hurt whither hee runneth headlong himselfe even unto the end Iun. Aâ—aâ—ysâ—n 7. cap. Exod. God as a just Judge seeing a mans heart to bee bent upon wickednesse doth as a just Judge inflict upon him the spirituall punishment of induration To this purpose Augustine handling that place Rom. 1. how the Lord gave up the Gentiles to their owne lusts useth this distinction that some things there rehearsed are sinnes and no punishment as the pride and vanity of their mindes vers 21. They were not thankefull but became vaine in their imagination Some a punishment and no sinne as eternall death which they were worthy of vers 31. the rest that came betweene are both sinnes and punishments By this distinction Augustine in another place answereth this objection of the Pelagians God say they should not take such punishment of sinne Vt peccator per vindictam plura committeret That the sinners thereby commit more sinne Augustine answereth to this effect Sic ostendit ista esse peccata ut etiam poenae fint peccatorum he sheweth these so to be sinnes as that they are also punishments of sinnes as the Apostle there saith vers 27. Man with man wrought filthinesse and received to themselves such recompence of their error as was meet So the meaning of Augustine is that God did not send them upon the Gentiles as they were sinnes but they are to be considered as punishments of their sinnes as God hath an hand therein Likewise whereas Iulian the Pelagian objected that Per patientiam divinam sunt non per potentiam desideriis traditi That they were delivered over to their lusts not by the power but by the patience of God Augustine to shew the contrarie giveth instance of that place Ezech. 14.9 When it is said If the Prophet be deceived I have deceived him Patientia an potentia est Is it the patience or the power of God that doth this And concerning the hardning of Pharaohs heart Augustine concludeth thus Deus ejus voluntatem proprio suo vito malam in hoc peccatum judicio suo justo occulto inclinavit God did incline his will being evill by it owne faulâ— into this sinne by his just yet secret judgement If God did incline it he did more than suffer it or minister the occasion only whereby it was inclined Hierome expresseth as much by this similitude Vnus est solis calor secundùm essentias subjacentes alia liquefacit alia indurat liquatur cera induratur lutum there is buâ— one kinde of heate in the Sunne and according to the matter which it worketh upon some things it melteth some things it hardneth the wax is melted the clay hardned Origene also useth the same similitude and applieth it thus Sic indurasse dicitur Deus cor Pharaoniâ— quia cor ejus secundùm ea quae cogitabat luteum limosum erat So God as the Sunne hardneth the clay is said to have hardned Pharaohs heart because his heart according to those things which he thought was earthly and muddy And in another place he bringeth in this Simile Vt eodem opere plâ—viae terra diligenter exculta affert bonos fructus inculta tribulos as by the same worke of the raine the earth being well tilled bringeth forth good fruit and the untilled thistles Like as then the Sun hardneth the clay the raine bringeth forth weedes not of it selfe but by reason of the nature of the thing concurring whereupon it worketh so by the working of God after a most secret and hid manner the hearts of the wicked are hardned but the cause thereof is in themselves And thus much shall suffice of this question see it handled before 2. Doct. chap. 7. and
chap. 8 quest 12. and confut 1. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God overruleth mens affections Vers. 3. THe Lord gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians Hereby wee learne that God hath the ruling and turning of mens affections he can worke them either to favour or disfavour Piscat So the Wiseman saith As the rivers of waters the Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord â—e tâ—â—neth it whither soever it pleaseth him Prov 21.1 Like as the husband man maketh furrowes in his ground and draweth the water which way it pleaseth him and as the sternes man in the vessell doth move it which way he listeth so can the Lord order and governe the streames of mens affections 2. Doct. Godly men have their passions and affections Vers. 8. SO he went out from Pharaoh very angry Even wise and godly men have their affections it iâ— not as the Stoikes taught that there is a vacuity and absence of them in wise and perfect men They are not without affections but they rule them by reason and their reason is sanctified by grace The Apostle saith be angry but sinne not Ephes. 4.26 He alloweth to be angry but not to sinne in anger Christ the most perfect man that ever was had his affections as of anger Marke 3.5 He looked round about him â—â—gerly of joy Luk. 10.21 Iesus rejoyced in spirit of sorrow Matth. 26.38 My soule is heavy unto death of love as Ioh. 13.23 The disciple whom Iesus loved 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against Purgatory BEfore in the third question where it is disputed what Angels God used in bringing the last plague of death of the first borne upon Egypt Pererius sheweth the difference betweene the ministry of the Angels in this life and in the next falling to make mention of purgatory for they cannot doe otherwise for ther lives but upon every occasion broach their owne fansies leaveth it as uncertaine and undiscussed whether the good Angels or the bad should be ministers of purgatory he thinketh not the bad that they should exercise power over them which in their life time did conquere the Devill neither yet will hee have them to be the good It is an unmeet thing saith he that they which shortly should become the fellowes and partakers of the blessed Angels in heaven should bee punished by them Perer. 1. disput in cap. 11. Contra. 1. Let any reasonable man judge whether it be not like that purgatory should be a meere fansie where there is supposed to bee torments and yet no tormentor In that hee thinketh that neither good Angels nor bad are the ministers of those torments I condescend to him who then not Christ I am sure for he hath redeemed them nor yet God himselfe for the Apostle saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen it is God that justifiâ—th who shall condemne Rom. 8.33.34 God hath justified them by faith in Christ and being justified there is nothing further to be laid to their charge If then there be no tormenter in purgatory there is no torment in purgatory and so purgatory fire is quite quenched and put out 2. Beside this uncertainty who should be the tormenters there be other maine points not yet resolved of among them concerning purgatory as of the place where it is of the fire what it is corporall or spirituall of the time how long it shall last whether hundred yeeres or thousands of the greatnesse of the paine whether it exceed all the torments and punishments of this life These articles are not yet defined and determined among them as Bellarmine sheweth lib. de purgat from chap. 6. to chap. 14. Therefore we will leave them to their uncertainties and as they make question of the circumstances of purgatory so we will not onely make question of purgatory it selfe but are most sure that it is but an invention of their owne for all they which dye in the Lord that is in the faith of Christ are pronounced blessed and to rest from their labours and their workes follow them Revel 14.13 Here are three arguments against purgatory They which dye in the faith of Christ are blessed but they which are in hell torments for purgatory they make part of hell are not blessed They doe rest from their labours but they which are in purgatory are in labour and paine Their workes follow them for their reward but they which are tormented â—nd punished are not rewarded Therefore wee acknowledge no other purgatory but in this life a perfect purgation of our sinnes in Christ Heb. 12.3 and an imperfect which is by the fiery probation of affliction as S. Peter calleth it Thinke it not strange concerning the fiery triall which is among you to prove you 1. Pet. 4.12 2. Confut. Against the Manichees which reject the old Testament Vers. 10. BVt the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart Hence the Manichees tooke occasion to utter their blasphemies against the God of the old Testament and to reject the Scriptures themselves of the old Testament as proceeding from a God that was a worker of evill in hardning mens hearts These Augustine confuteth at large hom 88. de tempore shewing how God is said to harden the heart without any touch of sinne for thus he writeth Non Pharaonem Dei violentia sed propria impietas obduravit Not any violence from God but Pharaohs owne impiety did harden him And these words I will harden Pharaohs heart he expoundeth thus Cum abfuerit ei gratis mea obduret illum nequitia sua when my grace is from him then his owne wickednesse shall harden him 2. Then he doth illustrate it by this similitude as the water is frozen till the Sun shine upon it then it resolveth and so soone as the Sunne is departed it is bound with cold againe the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it selfe so properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it is hardned 3. But if the question be asked why the Lord suffereth any to be hardned he maketh this answer Aut illorum iniquitati qui obdurari merentur adscribendum aut ad inscruâ—abilia Dei judicia referendum quae plerunque sunt occulta nunquam autem injusta This must â—â—thâ—r be ascribed to their iniquity which deserve to be hardned or it must be referred to the judgements of God which are often hid but never unjust It sufficeth 〈◊〉 to know and beleeve as the Apostle saith Rom. 9. Is there iniquity with God 3. Confut. Against Pererius that thinketh none in this life to be without hope of grace and repentance NOw further whereas Pererius in the treatise of induration moveth this disputation whether any man can be so hardned in this life as that he become altogether impenitent and incorrigible and without hope of grace and resolveth upon the negative part that none in this life are in such
doth not here signifie the Sabbath which was the seventh day but it is taken for any festivall day of rest and may here bee translated the morrow after the rest Iun. because upon the first day of the pasch they were commanded to rest 5. This they did in presenting their first fruits unto God both for remembrance of that time when they came out of Egypt which was in the moneth Abib the moneth of new fruits as also to stirre them to bee thankfull unto God and to acknowledge him to be the giver and author of their abundance and plentie Pererius QUEST XXVI Whether the seventh day were more solemne than the first Vers. 16. ALso in the seventh day shall bee an holy assemblie Here the solemnitie of the first and seventh day seeme to be alike But Levit. 23.8 the Latine translator readeth thus Dies septimus erit celebrior sanctior The seventh day shall bee more solemne and holy Unto this objection divers answers are framed 1. It is called holier because this day is by speciall words called a day of restraint or of a solemne assemblie Deut. 16.8 Wherein it being the last day of the Feast there was a great assemblie of the people gathered together to praise God So in the same sense the last day of the Feast of Tabernacles is called the great day Ioh. 7.37 2. Others answer that it was greater not in comparison of the first day but of the other comming betweene Lyran. 3. But the best answer is that in the originall there is no degree of comparison but as it is said of the first day there shall be therein an holy convocation so it is said of the seventh Thâ—â—e shall bee an holy assemblie or convocation Perer. So here a question is moved questionlesse and needlesse 4. Now the reason why the first and the seventh day were more solemne than the rest may be this because on the first day of the Passeover they went out of Egypt and on the seventh day they passed through the red sea and these two dayes in remembrance of these two great benefits they kept with greater solemnitie this generally is the opinion of the Jewes and the reasons to confirme it may be these two first because as in the first day there was an holy convocation so also was there on the last when Moses and all Israel gave solemne thanks unto God Exod. 15. And beside the manner and order of their travell agreeth thereunto for on the 15. day they came to Succoth on the 17. to Ethom to Pi-hahiroth or the mouth of Chiroth on the 18. day there they staied where Pharaoh overtooke them the 20. and the night following they went over the red Sea Iunius QUEST XXVII Why the seventh day is called a day of restraint Deut. 16.8 BUt whereas it is said Deut. 16.8 on the seventh day of the paschall solemnitie shall be a restraint oâ— solemne assemblie where the Latine translator readeth collecta there shall be a collection here ariseth a question about the meaning of these words 1. They which defend this translation some doe expound it of the collection which was made toward the expences of the temple Thomas But against this sense both Lyranus his reason may bee urged because the morrow after the pasch it was lawfull for the people to returne home Deut. 16.7 and therefore it is not like that collection was made after their departure as also Paulus Burgensis sheweth out of the sentence of the Hebrewes that collection was used to be made for the temple throughout all Palestina upon the first day of the twelfth moneth Pererius also alleageth that place 2 Chron. 7.8 that Salomon Fecit die octava collectam Made a collâ—ction upon the eight day but saith he it is not like that so rich a King as Salomon made any collection of mony Therefore Pererius interpreteth it of the solemne collection and gathering together of the people upon that day to give God thanks solemnely and publikely for their mightie and glorious deliverance out of Egypt But all this businesse will soone be at an end if the vulgar Latine interpretation be refused as not so agreeable to the originall word which signifieth rather a restraint as even now shall be shewed 2. The Septuagint also are as wide which doe translate the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the going out because then the Feast was at an end but this is not the meaning of the word though it be true that then the people were dismissed as Salomon upon the eight solemne day of the Feast of Tabernacles sent away the people 1 King 8.66 having kept that day as a time of restraint 2 Chron. 7.7 at even he gave them leave to depart for so these places are reconciled 3. Therefore the meaning rather is that it was a time of restraint the people were kept and restrained from worke upon that day so the word ghatzer signifies to forbid or restraine Lyran. Montan. Iun. And though the first day also were a day of restraint wherein they were forbidden all worke save about their meat yet it seemeth that this was the greater day being the conclusion and determination of the Feast as these two are joyned together the last and great day of the Feast Iohn 7.37 as iâ— shewed before QUEST XXVIII Why he which did not eat unleavened bread was to be cut off Vers. 19. THat soule shall be cut off from the congregation of Israel 1. Some doe expound this onely of the capitall punishment that such as neglected or contemned this observation of unleavened bread should be put to death and so is this phrase taken Exod. 30.33 and 31. vers 14. and in other places Simler Piscat But though it be not denied that in some places this phrase to bee cut off from Israel signifieth onely the taking away of the life of the offender as in the places given in instance yet alwayes it is not so taken for Genes 17.14 it signifieth the cutting off from the societie and the communion of the Saints both in this life and in the next as may appeare by the reason there given because he hath transgressed my covenant 2. Neither is it referred onely to the spirituall punishment as Osiander expoundeth this place by that of the Apostle that he which eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh his owne damnation 1 Cor. 11.29 for under the law the punishment of death was used in the like transgressions in the contempt of the law as for violating the Sabbath 3. Therefore this sentence pronounced against such contemners includeth a penaltie both upon the bodie and the soule and of this strict severitie two reasons may be given the one from the authoritie of the law-maker God that gave us both bodies and soules and all other good things beside hath power to make lawes both to binde the bodie and the soule and the contempt of his Commandements is worthie of capitall punishment the other reason is taken from
seeing the Lord who foreseeth all things did set unto Abraham this terme of 400. yeeres â—ee no doubt most faithfully kept his promise and as he had decreed so after 400. yeeres expired he delivered his seede from their oppressors 3. Moses act in killing the Egyptian was an act of faith not of presumption as both S. Stephen witnesseth Acts 7.25 Hee supposed 〈◊〉 brethren would have understood that God by his hand should give them deliverance as also the Apostle to the Heb. 11.25 By faith Moses when hee was come to age refused to be called the sonne of Pharaohs daughter and chose rather to suffer adversity with the people of God and againe vers 27. By faith he forsooke Egypt c. If Moses then of faith shewed himselfe to be the deliverer of his people as when he killed the Egyptian and cares not for the favour and honour of Pharaohs court then was it not a presumptuous act for the which he should be punished 4. And how standeth it with Gods justice to punish all the people of Israel with the captivity of 30. yeeres longer for the sinne and presumption of one man if Moses had offended and trespassed therein 5. Neither is that observation of forty perpetuall neither David for his sinne nor Peter for his deniall of Christ nor the incestuous young man among the Corinthians were injoyned any such time of penance and Nebuchadnezzars time of repentance farre exceeded this proportion which continued seven yeeres Dan. 4.20 for true repentance is not measured by the number of dayes but by the weight of the contrition and sorrow of heart neither is it found in Scripture that any one man had 40. dayes penance imposed upon him There was another reason of the 40. yeeres wandring of Israel in the desert for according to the time wherein the spies searched the land which was 40. dayes they have a yeere set for a day for the punishment of the sinne of the spies in raising a slander upon that good land all but Caleb and Iosuah and of the people in giving no credit unto them see Numb 14.34 QUEST LXV The time of the Hebrewes departure out of Egypt compared with the Chronology of the Heathen NOw in the last place it shall bee declared how this time of the departing of Israel agreeth with the â—orren computations according to the Chronology of the Heathen 1. They therefore observe five notable periods of times from whence they use to make supputation of their yeeres from the monarchy of Ninus and Semiramis in Abrahams time from the floud of Ogyges and from Inachus and Phâ—râ—neus about the time of the Patriarke Iacob from the battell of Troy which fell out in Sampsons dayes or under Helâ— the high Priest from the beginning of the Olympiades which began in the 8. yeere of the reigne of Ahaz from the building of Rome in the 1. yeere of the seventh Olympiade which concurreth with the 16. yeere of the reigne of Hesekiah 2. According then to these divers kindes of computations there are also divers opinions concerning the time of Israels departure out of Egypt Apion the Gramarian a professed adversary to the Jewes against whom Iosephus wrote two bookes will have Moses to bring the Israelites out of Egypt in the time of the seventh Olympiade when the City Carthage was built by the Tyrians in Africa thus Iosephus reporteth the opinion of Apion in his 2. booke But this to bee apparantly false Iosephus sheweth proving that the Temple of Salomon was built 143. yeeres before Carthage and the Israelites came out of Egypt 480. yeeres before that 1. King 6.1 so that their leaving of Egypt was above 600. yeeres before the building of Carthage 3. As Apion commeth farre short in his computation so Porphyrius goeth as much beyond who in the fourth booke of those which hee wrote against the Christians will have Moses to be before the times of Semiramis which is a grosse error for it is without all question that Abraham was borne under the monarchy of Ninus and from Abrahams birth untill the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt are 505. yeeres whereof an 100. are counted from Abrahams birth to Isaacs and 405. from thence unto Israels redemption as hath beene shewed 4. Lactantius lib. 4. cap. 5. thinketh that Moses was 900. yeeres before the battell of Troy whereas it will be found that he was only 356. yeeres or thereabout elder than those times 5. Manethon an ancient Writer of the Egyptian affaires maketh Moses more ancient by 393. yeeres than when Danaus went to Argos that is about a thousand yeeres before the battell of Troy But that cannot bee seeing the Trojan warre is held to have beene in the time of Sampson or Helâ— not above 356. yeeres after the returne of the Hebrewes out of Egypt 6. Some Christian Writers thinke that the Hebrewes were delivered out of the Egyptian Captivity in the time of Ogyges floud as Iustinus Martyr Clemens Alexandrinus 1. lib. Stromatum Iulian Africanus But that is not like for the same Iulian African by the testimony of divers Heathen Writers sheweth that Ogyges floud was 1020. yeeres before the beginning of the Olympiades But from the departure of Israel out of Egypt untill the Olympiades began which was in the 8. yeere of the reigne of Ahaz are counted but 760. yeere or thereabout so that Moses should bee above two hundred and fifty yeeres after Ogyges floud 7. This is then the right computation compared with the Chronology of the Heathen that the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt was 356. yeere before the Trojan battell and 764. yeeres before the Olympiades 788. yeeres before the building of Rome 910. yeeres before the Captivity of Babylon 980. yeeres before the reigne of Cyrus 1200. yeeres before Alexander the Great 1496. yeeres before Herod under whose reigne Christ was borne And according to the sacred Chronologie this redemption of Israel from the Egyptian bondage was 2453. yeeres after the creation of the world 797. yeeres after Noahs floud 505. yeeres after the death of the Patriarke Ioseph 480. yeeres before the building of Salomons Temple and 1536. yeeres before the birth of our blessed Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus Ex Perer. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. How the Lords holy dayes should be kept Vers. 16. IN the first day shall be an holy convocation The word is mikra which also signifieth reading which sheweth how holy and festivall dayes ought to be spent in assembling the people together and in reading and preaching unto them the mercies and benefits of God Pellican And this was the use among the people of God as S. Peter saith Moses hath of old time them that preach him in every City seeing he is read in the Synagogues every Sabbath 2. Doct. A particular application of our redemption by Christs death needfull Vers. 21. CHuse out of every of your households a lambe God would as it were by a speciall application have every private house and family
shall bee a cloud and smoke by day and the shining of flaming fire by night c. and a covering shall be for a shadow in the day for the heate c. Isai. 4.5.6 QUEST XX. How this cloud differed from other clouds THis piller of the cloud was much differing from all other cloudes 1. In respect of the substance it was cleere and lightsome not darke and thicke as other cloudes are 2. It was in figure and shape as a piller the nether part thereof descending unto the Tabernacle the upper part reaching aloft unto heaven whereas other cloudes descend not as low as the earth 3. It alwayes kept this figure and fashion of a piller whereas other cloudes doe alter and vary in shape and appearance 4. This cloud moved of it selfe whereas other cloudes are moved by the wind and of themselves have no motion this way or that way but only as they ascend and goe up in vapors but this cloud both ascended and descended 5. Other cloudes are made of naturall causes as of vapors and exhalations but this cloud was raised by the Lord beside the ordinarie course of nature 6. The effects were divers for other cloudes are apt to engender raine and drop downe moisture but this was not ordained for that end but to shew them the way in going before them 7. This cloud differed in motion from all other cloudes for they are carried all one way with the wind this sometime went forward when the camp removed sometime it came backe and stood upon the Tabernacle it went sometime to the right hand sometime to the left according as the journies of the people were appointed out 8. The motion of it was alwayes certaine it went before the campe as they were able to endure to follow whereas other cloudes are carried swiftly that they cannot bee followed 9. The situation of it was divers not carried aloft as other cloudes which can be no direction to leade a man in his journey but this cloud was of such equall distance as it did part out their way before them like as the starre that guided the Wise men appeared below in the aire to conduct them Matth. 2.10 Lastly whereas other cloudes are not durable but are soone dissipated and dissolved by the wind and weather this cloud remained firme and so continued for the space of 40. yeeres Ex Perer. QUEST XXI· When the cloud began first to appeare BUt concerning the time of the first and last appearing of this cloud it is not like as Hierome thinketh that it went not before them till they came unto the third station in Etham because mention is first made of it there 1. For they had need as well before of a guide to direct them the way as afterward and therefore it is like that they had this direction in their first setting forth out of Egypt 2. As it is in the Psalm He made his people to goe out like sheepe and led them in the wildernesse like a flocke Psal. 78.52 where the Prophet alludeth unto the fashion of those countries where the shepheard goeth before and the sheepe follow after as our Saviour saith in the parable Ioh. 10.27 So the Lord went before his people as a shepheard in the cloudy and fierie piller even when he brought them out of Egypt 3. The Prophet Esâ—y also alluding unto this cloud saith That upon every place of mount Sion and the assemblies thereof shall be a cloud Esay 4.5 So that hence it may be gathered that the Israelites in every place and in all their assemblies and campes had the presence of this cloud 4. Then like as the Wise men saw the starre that brought them to Christ in the beginning of their journey as they say Wee have seene his starre in the East and are come to worship him Matth. 2.2 they first saw the starre and then came forth so it may bee thought that the Israelites saw this cloud in their first setting forth 5. The people had need to have had all encouragement in their first going forth and to be animated in their journey and therefore it is like that the Lord did at the very first shew these comfortable signes of his presence QUEST XXII When the cloud and fiery piller ceased ANd as the cloud appeared not so late as Hierome supposeth so neither was it taken out of their sighâ— so soone as the Hebrewes imagine for they say that after Aarons death who died on the first day of the first moneth in the 40. yeere after their departure out of Egypt Numb 33.38 the piller of the cloud and of the fire were no more seene and their reason is because that after that time no more mention is made of them Contra. First this is no sufficient reason for neither is there mention made of them a good while before 2. The words of the text are against their opinion for it is said That the Lord tooke not away the piller of the cloud by day nor the piller of fire by night from before the people Vers. 22. So then as long as they had need of this direction the Lord failed them not 3. Seeing the use of these pillers was to leade them the way that they might goe by day and by night it is like so long as they were in the way and travelled in the wildernesse they had the presence of the cloud the same cause remaining the meanes are like to have beene still continued But from the mount Hor where Aaron died untill they came to the plaine of Moab in the borders of the land of Canaan there were many solitary desert and waste places thorow the which they passed for divers of their stations were yet behind as appeareth Numb 33. that they had after they came from Mount Hor eight severall stations therefore it may well bee gathered that as they had the direction of the cloud in their other stations so also in these Perer. 4. Then like as the starre left not the Wise men till it had brought them to the very house where the holy 〈◊〉 was Matth. 2. So we may judge that the cloud left not the Israelites till they came into the land of Canaan whither the Lord intended to bring them QUEST XXIII Of the foure great miracles which the Lord wrought for the people in the desert THis extraordinary leading of the people by the going before of the piller of the cloud and fire was one of the great miracles which the Lord wrought for his people in the desert for as foure things are chiefly necessary for those that travell strength and health of body foode rayment and a guide so the Lord in every one of these wrought wonderfully for them 1. Their feete did not swell for the 〈◊〉 of forty yeeres Deut. 8.4 And of all that great multitude there being not so few in all as 2000. thousand seeing the third part of this number even 600. thousand were fighting men above twenty yeere old there
33.7 yet they had their time of rest during this three dayes journey Perer. But when they removed from the wildernesse of Sinai they went three dayes together without any stay the Arke still going before them to find out a resting place Numb 10.13 till they came to Kibroth Hatavah which was their next mansion place Numb 33.16 The Lord still animating and strengthning his people to go forward Iunius The third manner of staying was when the cloud remained still upon the Tabernacle two or three dayes and then they pitched their tents and thus the cloud staied in 40. yeere not above 42. times for so many mansion or camping places they had as they are set downe Numb 33. 4. Now how to know when they were to pitch their tents Pererius conjectureth at it and giveth these three rules First if the cloud stayed about noone then they knew that it onely rested till they had refreshed themselves but if it staied in the afternoone before night that they journeyed no more that day they tooke it that then they were to stay there some while and so pitched their tents But if it made no stay till the evening they pitched no tents till the next morning and then if the cloud went not forward they then set up their tents These are onely Pererius conjectures and uncertaine And it otherwise may be gathered out of the Scripture that they did not pitch their tents till the cloud had staied two dayes at the least as we read Numb 9.20 When the cloud abode a few dayes in the Tabernacle they pitched their tents at the commandement of God and afterward vers 22. If the cloud tarried two dayes or a moneth or a yeere upon the Tabernacle the children of Israel pitched their tents It seemeth then by this that this was a rule unto them not to pitch their tents or settle their campe till after two dayes Beside they had Moses to give them direction also in this case when to encampe themselves who continually consulted with God 5. Now the manner of their removing was this when the cloud arose from the Tabernacle the Priests and Levites tooke up the Arke and carried it and when they went forward with the Arke Moses used this prayer Rise up O Lord and let thine enemies bee scattered and let them that hate thee flee before thee And when the Arke rested hee said Returne O Lord to the many thousands of Israel Numb 10.35 Hereunto the Prophet alludeth when hee saith The Lord shall arise and his enemies shall be scattered Perer. 6. This cloud began not onely now to appeare when they were come to their third mansion place in Etham as Hierome thinketh but straightway upon their setting forth from Ramesis though mention be made first of it here that proveth it not now first to have appeared as Moses is said first in this place to have taken Iosephs bones with him which was done notwithstanding at his first comming out of Egypt the Scripture observeth not alwayes the order of time in setting downe matters of historie but the coherence of the argument So neither did the cloud leave them at Aarons death as is the opinion of the Hebrewes for seven moneths after Aarons death who died in the fift moneth immediatly before Moses death when Iosuah was consecrated to succeed him mention is made of the piller of the cloud wherein the Lord appeared to Moses Deut. 31.15 See more of this quest 22. before 7. Gregorie maketh the appearing of the bright cloud by day a signe of Gods favour and mercie to his obedient people and the appearing of the terrible fire by night as a signe of his severitie and justice against the wicked and unbeleevers Gregor hom 21. in Evangel Ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the lawfull use of ceremonies Vers. 9. THis shall be as a signe unto thee upon thine hand c. As this place sheweth that there were then in the Church and so are still commendable ceremonies which the Lord hath instituted to be â—â—membrances of spirituall things as these were of their deliverance out of Egypt so their superstition is reproved that dwell in the externall ceremony not looking unto the spirituall sense Ferus as the Pharisies did which did weare their phylacteries and fringes yet forgot the law represented and signified by them 2. Doct. Christ the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament Vers. 21. IEhovah went before them He that is here called Iehovah is chap. 14.19 called the Angell of God which was none other but Jesus Christ Iun. the Prince and Captaine of his Church the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament according as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.9 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also is for ever 3. Doct. Christ sheweth us the way to the heavenly Canaan as the piller did direct the Israelites toward their Canaan Vers. 22. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of fire This piller divers wayes represented Christ 1. He is the piller and upholder of his Church 2. He leadeth us the way unto eternall life as he himselfe saith I am the way the truth and the life Ioh. 14. 3. Aperit nobis viam maris rubei id est gratiam baptismi sanguine suo rubentes He openeth to us the way of the red sea that is the grace of baptisme died red in his bloud Rupertus 4. Christ is both a fire and a cloud that is both God and man 5. In noctâ— veteris testamenti paucis lucebat c. He did shine but to a few in the night of the old Testament as this fierie cloud gave light by night Ferus 6. But the most lively signification is this that Christ is that covering cloud under whose shadow wee are defended from the heate and stormes of temptation as the Prophet sheweth Isai. 4.6 Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the theatricall Pagean of the Masse Vers. 9. THey shall be a signe unto thee upon thine head These externall signets upon the head and frontlets betweene the eyes instituted at the first to a good end to put them in minde alwayes of the law of God they afterward superstitiously abused onely glorying in the outward ostentation of them so in Poperie the right use of the Supper of the Lord is turned into theatricum quâ—ndam actum Missa into a theatricall shew of the Masse calling men à communione ad spectaculum from the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ to a gazing spectacle Simlerus 2. Conf. Against the adoration of reliques Vers. 19. MOses tooke the bones of Ioseph This maketh nothing for the adoration of the reliques of Saints which idolatrous use is still retained and practised in Poperie for Iosephs bones were carried to be buried they tooke up the bones of Saints and Martyrs after they have beene buried these were true bones they shew counters and ducks bones and such like trash for the bones of the Saints
of Israel Hierome numbreth them to have beene ten the first for want of water Exod. 17. the second likewise for water Numb 20. the third Exod. 14. when the Egyptians pursued them the fourth and fifth about Manna when they kept it till the morning and gathered it upon the Sabbath Exod. 16. The sixth murmuring was for flesh Exod. 16. and the seventh for flesh likewise Numb 11.4 The eighth for Moses absence when they made the golden Calfe the ninth when they tempted God in fighting against the Amalckites being forbidden Numb 14. The tenth upon the returne of the Spies which were sent to search the Land of Canaan Hieron dâ— 10. tentationib But if all the murmurings of the Israelites be summed together they will bee found more than ten not fewer than twenty And they were of three sorts either generall of the whole congregation or speciall of some few or particular of some principall persons 1. Their generall murmurings were upon these occasions first for things which they endured as the increasing of their bondage in Egypt at the first comming of Moses Exod. 5.21 their feare to be all destroyed of the Egyptians chap. 14.11 their wearinesse of the way Numb 11.1 their biting by Serpents Numb 21. Secondly for things which they wanted as for sweet and potable water Exod. 15.24 for bread chap. 16.3 for water in Rephidim Exod. 17. for flesh Numb 11. for water againe when Moses also offended Numb 20. Thirdly they murmured and disobeyed when any thing was imposed them which they liked not as twiâ—e they were disobedient about Manna in reserving it till the morning chap. 16.19 and in gathering it upon the Sabbath chap. 16.28 where although their murmuring be not expressed yet this their refractary disobedience could not bee without murmuring So they rebelled in fighting against the Amalekites and Canaanites being forbidden Numb 14.41 Fourthly they murmured when their expectation was deceived as upon Moses long absence Exod. 32.1 when they heard a false report of Canaan that the inhabitants thereof were invincible Numb 14. when Core Dathan and Abiram with their adherents were suddenly destroyed Numb 16.41 These murmurings in all were sixteene 2. The second kind of murmuring was of some speciall men as Core Dathan and Abirain with two hundred and 50. persons murmured against Moses and Aaron Numb 16.3 The third kind was of some principall persons as of Aaron and Miriam against Moses Numb 12. Of Moses himselfe at the waters of strife Numb 20. of Aaron being discontent and so negligent in his office because of the death of his two sonnes Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10.19 Here are foure more and unto these others by diligent observations may be added QUEST XXXIX Whether the wood had any vertue in it that Moses cast â—nto the water 25. ANd he cried unto the Lord and the Lord shewed him a tree 1. The Hebrewes thinke that this tree had no vertue at all in it to make the waters sweet but rather the contrary but that God would therein shew his power in healing one contrary by another as Elizeus did heale the waters by casting in of salt which was more like to have made them more bitter and our Saviour anointed the eyes of the blinde with clay and spittle which was an unlike thing to heale them 2. But it is more probable that there was some vertue in this wood to season and relish the water because it is said that the Lord shewed him or as the Hebrew word signifieth taught him the tree Tanquam tale jam liguâ—â—â—oc esseâ— quo posset hoc fieri As though it were such a kinde of wood as could doe this thing So Augustine reasoneth quaest 57. in Exod. to whom Calvinus and Simlerus consent for to what end else did the Lord direct Moses to that speciall tree more than to others unlesse we say that there were no trees there at all in the desert But the words will inferre another sense that seeing the Lord shewed him a tree there was a tree to be shewed as the Lord caused Hagar to see a fountaine not which newly sprung out of the ground but which was there before though she saw it not Gen. 21. The author of Ecclesiasticus chap. 38.5 affirmeth that there was vertue in the wood 3. But Iosephus is deceived who saith Moses fructum ligni accepit forte ibi jacens That Moses tooke a peece of wood lying there by chance whereas the Lord shewed it him and he further addeth that Moses did not cast in the wood because the people asked what it should doe but caused a great part of the water to bee drawne out of the fountaine and so the residue became sweet but this is also directly contrary to the text QUEST XL. Wherein the miracle consisted of healing the waters NOw although there were some vertue in this wood to heale the waters yet it was done not without a great mâ—racle 1. Which consisted not herein because the Lord Ostendit et lignum ubi nullum erat Shewed him a tree where none was for this is confuted before 2. Neither Quâ—a in tali natura ligni Creator demonstrator lâ—â—dandus est Because the Creator and shewer is to be praised in giving such a nature to the wood as Augustine in the same place for if the nature of the wood had done it it had not beene miraculous 3. But herein was the miracle that by the meanes of so small a peece of wood such a deale of water was changed as served such a great multitude Calvin And that it was suddenly and presently changed Simler And the waters were but made sweet only for that time and afterward returned to their bitter nature againe as Pliny before alleaged maketh mention of bitter waters there Iun. QUEST XLI Why the Lord used this meane in healing of the waters GOd could have healed the waters if it had pleased him without this tree But it pleased him to use this meanes for these causes 1. To teach us that we should not neglect the meanes which God appointed So the Lord divided the red sea and dried the way by a strong East winde Ezechias was healed by a lumpe of figges So God instructeth men and begetteth them to the faith by the ministery of men Simler 2. God hereby also reproveth their distrust and diffidence shewing Multa sibi in promptu esse remedia quibusque malis That he hath many remedies in store for whatsoever evils Calvin 3. Hoc medio uti voluit propter mysterium He would use this meane because of the mystery Ferus QUEST XLII Of the mysticall signification of this tree NOw what mystery is signified in this tree that sweetned the waters shall bee shewed in a word 1. Some by the bitter waters doe understand the killing letter of the Law which is impotable and unpleasant but being qualified by the Gospell Iam dulcâ—â— erit litera The letter of the Law becommeth pleasant Ferus 2. This tree was a figure of that rod
purpose not to returne convey much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta
the Romane Governours in Judea unto Caesar. 2. If it be the Prince himselfe and chiefe Magistrate which enjoyneth any thing unjust and unlawfull it must be considered of what nature and kinde it is that is commanded 1. If it be against piety and our duty toward God we must rather submit our selves to the punishment than yeeld unto the Commandement and so obey rather God than man as the three children did rather chuse to endure the flaming fire than to worship the Idoll which was set up and Daniel resolved rather to be cast into the Lions den than to be barred from making his prayer unto his God 2. If the things commanded concerne our temporall state as in grievous impositions taxes payments no resistance at all is to be used but such burdens must be endured with patience untill by good meanes as first prayer unto God and then making their moane unto their Governours they may bee eased So the people of God did submit themselves to such payments as their land was taxed at by their hard Lords as the people of Judea paid unto the King of Ashur 300. talents of silver and 30. talents of gold which he required of them 2. King 18.14 But Naboths case herein was singular who did well in not yeelding his inheritance unto the Kings desire because that belonged to the speciall policy of that nation not to alienate their inheritance from one tribe to another that a distinction of their families and tribes might be kept that it might be knowne of what tribe and family the Messiah should come Bucanus 3. If the subjects life be by indirect meanes assaulted or the chastity of his wife or the life of his children which a man is bound to defend by the law of nature as we see the unreasonable creatures are ready to defend their young ones the subject in these extremities is not to rise against the Princes authority yet the law of nature will binde him by all lawfull meanes to defend him and his Bucanus As the Prophet Elisha when the King sent a messenger unjustly to take off his head bid the Elders that sate with him in the house to shut the doore and to handle the messenger roughly 3. The third consideration is Where that is in what kinde of State such unjust edicts and commandements are enjoyned for if the State bee usurped by some Tyrant not lawfully possessed of the government it is lawfull for the State to remove him and to take armes against him as the Macchabees resisted King Antiochus wicked decrees 1. Macch. 2. who was an usurper upon that State Againe where the people are free and the Prince received upon condition to maintaine the ancient franchises liberties and immunities of the country the State may lawfully maintaine their liberties against the vexation and violence of Tyrants which was the case of Helvetia when they shaked off the government of the house of Austria And this case is much like unto that when Trajanus the Emperour delivered a sword to a certaine Governour with these words Vse this sword for me as long as I doe justly and against me if I doe unjustly But in an absolute Monarchy the case is otherwise QUEST XXV Whether it had beene lawfull for David to have killed Saul against Bucanus BUt here I cannot let passe untouched that assertion of Bucanus David potuisse juste interficere Saulem c. That David might justly have killed Saul because he had violently taken from him his wife had slaine the Priests and persecuted him with open force But that David did forbeare lest hee might have given offence to the Heathen that would have taken exception to the Kings of Israel if they had entred by bloud and others might have beene encouraged by this example to have attempted the like against lawfull Kings and beside David should have obscured his owne calling being of God and have beene thought ambitiously by seeking his owne revenge to have aspired to the kingdome Bucan de magistrat loc 77. Contra. It was neither expedient nor lawfull for David to have killed Saul as may be shewed by these reasons 1. He himselfe saith Wickednesse proceed from the wicked but mine hand be not upon thee 1. Sam. 24. 14. That which to doe was wickednesse was no wayes lawfull but to have killed Saul was wickednesse as David himselfe confesseth Ergo. 2. Againe David taketh another reason from the calling of Saul Who can lay his hand upon the Lords anointed and be guiltlesse 1. Sam. 26.9 It was not only not expedient but not lawfull to slay the Lords anointed 3. David maketh this distribution Either the Lord shall smite him or his day shall come to dye or he shall descend into battell and perish the Lord keepe me from laying mine hand c. ibid. v. 10. Saul only lawfully could end his dayes in respect of David three wayes by a naturall death or violent in battell or by the extraordinary stroke of Gods hand for he that God had set up must be removed also by God but if David had killed him he had not ended his dayes by any of these meanes 2. Places of doctrine observed upon the fifth Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this Commandement THe duties prescribed in this Commandement are of three sorts 1. Either of superiours toward their inferiours 2. Or of the inferiours toward their superiours 3. Or such as are common to them both 1. Superiours are first parents to whom it appertaineth 1. To nourish and provide for their children 1. Timoth. 5.8 If any provide not for his owne and namely for them of his houshold he hath denied the faith c. 2. To defend them against wrong Ephes 6.4 Fathers provoke not your children to wrath 3. To instruct them They must bring them up in the information of the Lord Ephes. 6.4 4. To give them due discipline and correction Prov. 19.18 Chasten thy sonne while there is hope and let not thy soule spare for his murmuring Contrary hereunto are 1. Either to be carelesse to provide for the children as Hagar cast away her sonne in despaire Gen. 21. or to pamper them too much and bring them up wantonly 2. Not to protect or defend them from wrongs or to be too much moved for small injuries offered unto them 3. Not to have care to give them good education and instruction as they whose children called the Prophet bald-head 2. King 2. 4. Not to give them due correction but to suffer them to commit sinne without cheeke which was Eli his fault 1. Sam. 2. 2. Magistrates also are the fathers of the Common-wealth to whom it belongeth first to prescribe good Lawes agreeable to both the tables of the Morall law and therefore the King is bid to read in the Law of God all the dayes of his life Deut. 17.19 2. To see those Lawes executed and the morall Commandements observed and kept of all Rom. 13. vers 4. He is the minister
was the same both under the law of Moses and the law of Christ but that much was permitted and tolerated unto the Jewes onely for the hardnesse of their heart as our blessed Saviour sheweth Matth. 19. 2. Some doe urge the lawes of men and the greater punishments which have beene laid upon women for adulterie rather than upon men and that therefore the sinne of the woman should bee the greater But this sheweth not the greatnesse of the sinne before God but the greater inconvenience that is brought upon the civill and politike state which the lawes of men seeke chiefly to preserve by the adulterie of the woman rather than of the man 3. Some thinke that it is a greater sinne in the man because of his authoritie quia vir caput mulieris because the man is head of the woman and the Apostle biddeth that women if they would learne any thing should aske their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 Est ergo vir doctor mulieris The man then is the womans teacher then as the Priest sinneth more than a lay man because he is his teacher so the man doth more grievously offend than the woman Thomas in opuscul But this proveth not that the sinne of the man simply is greater than the sinne of the woman but in a certaine respect 4. Wherefore the best answer is that the sinne of adulterie in some respects is equall in both sexes and in some other greater both in the one and the other 1. In regard of the law of Matrimonie whereby they have given their faith each to the other the sinne seemeth to be equall for the man hath no more power over himselfe in this behalfe than the woman as S. Paul teacheth 1 Cor. 7.4 and therefore by Moses law as well the adulterer as the adulteresse was to be put to death 2. But in respect of the qualitie and condition of the person because the woman is the weaker vessell and the man is the head of the woman and of the more strength this sinne is greater in the man because hee therein give than evill example to the weaker partie and teacheth her an evill lesson Ecclesiasticus 9.1 3. But the inconveniences considered that follow hereupon as the ignominie and shame of houses the confusion of inheritances and the obtruding of false heires by the adulterie and false play of women their sinne is thought to exceâ—d Simler Which might be the reason also why among the Jewes the men were permitted to have divers wives but not the women to have divers husbands QUEST IX Whether adulterie be now necessarily to be punished by death SOmewhat here would bee inserted concerning the punishment of adulterie by the sentence of death wherein there are these three opinions 1. Some thinke that adulterie ought to be punished capitally according to the judiciall law of Moses and not otherwise Piscaetor giveth divers reasons hereof but two especially I will single out 1. Delicta temporibus naturam suam non mutant Sinnes doe not change their nature in time 2. Deus naturam suam non mutat Neither doth God change his nature so that he hateth sinne no lesse now than in times past neither will he have it lesse punished Praefat. in Exod. Contra. 1. The nature of sinne is the same though the punishment bee altered adulterie is as grievous before God now as it was under the law but the circumstances as of place and person so also of time may give occasion of aggravating or alleviating the punishment Hee that gathered sticks upon the Sabbath was stoned to death Numb 30. because it was necessarie that the law at the beginning being then newly given should bee established by severitie But yet our Saviour excuseth his Apostles for gathering and rubbing eares of corne upon the Sabbath Matth. 12. Saint Peter pronounced the sentence of death upon Aâ—amas and Sapphira for deteining part of that which they had given to the Church for the terror and example of others yet now such dissimulation is not held to be worthie of death 2. Neither is God changed by the changing or mitigating the rigour of the law but he removing the same applieth his law according to the different respect of 〈◊〉 and persons for as well hee might bee said to be changed in the changing of other 〈◊〉 as of the ceremoniall and judicials thereto annexed 4. If all judicials annexed to the Morall law are now to be necessarily retained then the violating of the rest of the Lords day as then of the Sabbath which was in that respect morall should be punished with death and blaspheming and prophaning of the name of God by swearing as Levit. 24.16 which would seeme to be too rigorous 5. And seeing the times of the Gospell are the times of mercie and those under the Law were the times of rigour and severitie to abate somewhat of the rigorous punishments of the Law not leaving sinne unpunished may seeme not unlawfull 2. Another opinion is that adulterie is not at all now to be punished by death for our Saviour would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie Ioh. 8. Contra. 1. Upon that example of Christ it cannot be gathered that it is unlawfull to censure adultery by death for it would follow as well that adultery is not to be punished at all because Christ inflicteth no punishment at all upon her onely this may be inferred that by Christs silence and forbearance it appeareth that the punishment of adultery by death is not necessary for if his will had beene that the rigour of that law should stand in force our Saviour needed not to have feared their trap lest they should have condemned him of rigour and severitie if he had judged her worthie of death and if he had repealed that law they would have accused him as contrarie to Moses 3. This then may bee collected by Christs silence and connivence that it is not necessarie that adulterie should alwayes and in all places be sentenced unto death but rather that it is left indifferent that neither those Churches are to be condemned of too great severitie which follow the president of Moses judicials herein nor yet they are to be accused of too much lenitie which judge adulterie otherwise than by death as they see it best to fit their estate so that the severitie of the punishment be answerable to the quality of the sinne By Moses law they which committed adulterie were to die the death that is if it were duplex adulterium that both the adulterer and adulteresse were married or if the woman were anothers wife Levit. 20.10 otherwise it was not death for a married man beside his wife to have a Concubine or to one wife to take another so shee were not anothers wife What will they thinke now of such single adulterie that would have it revenged by death they have no president in Moses law for the punishing of this kinde of adulterie by death then it is evident that all adulterie
to serve and worship God and to bring up their children in his feare and in their matrimonie which is a sweet and amiable fellowship is set forth that mysticall conjunction which is betweene Christ and his Church Ephes. 5.32 Ex Bucan Vrsin QUEST XVIII Of the mutuall matrimoniall duties betweene man and wife THe duties to bee performed in mariage are first such as are common betweene man and wife as 1. Mutuall love that they should one love another to love as they are beloved 2. Matrimoniall faith in keeping themselves one to another not seeking after strange flesh 3. A communion of their goods one supplying anothers wants and a communion of affection one having a lively fellow-feeling of anothers griefes 4. The education of their children wherein both the parents are bound to shew their Christian care 5. And mutuall hearing and forbearing one another tolerating their infirmities 〈◊〉 a great desire to have them amended and healed Vrsin 2. The duties required on the husbands part are 1. To instruct and teach his wife and bring her to the knowledge of God 1 Cor. 14.35 2. To be her head to protect and defend her from injuries to guide direct and governe her in discretion Ephes. 5.23 The husband is the woman's head as Christ is the head of her Church 3. To be amiable unto his wife not bitter or cruell unto her Colos. 3.19 not to use her as his maid or servant but as his yokefellow and collaterall companion and coadjutrix in the government of the house 4. To provide for her all things needfull in sicknes and in health for hee is worse than an Infidell that doth nor provide for those of his owne house 1 Timoth. 5.8 5. To honour the wife as the weaker vessell 1 Pet. 3.7 and in his Christian discretion to winne her with lenitie 3. The speciall duties on the behalfe of the wife are 1. To shew her care and diligence in preserving of her husbands domesticall estate and wisely disposing the houshold affaires as that hâ—swively Macâ—on is described Prov. 31. 2. To give due reverence and honour to her husband as unto her head as Sara is commended 1 Pet. 3.7 3. And to bee subject and obedient unto him in all things in the Lord Ephes. 5.22 QUEST XIX Whether marriage be left indifferent to all MAtrimonie is neither denied unto any by the divine institution nor yet commanded unto all 1. It is lawfull and granted unto all to marrie if they will for the Apostle saith that mariage is honourable among all men Hebr. 13.4 because that blessing given unto mariage Increase and multiplie was generall to Adam and all his posteritie 2. As mariage is not necessarily imposed upon all so is it indifferent unto those which have the gift of continencie for although they need not the remedie of matrimonie against fornication having received that speciall gift yet they may desire mariage for mutuall comfort and to have issue and for other ends whereunto marriage was appointed 3. But unto those which cannot containe it is necessarie to use this remedie and to them mariage is not indifferent So the Apostle saith It were good for a man not to touch a woman neverthelesse to avoid fornication let every man have his wife c. 1 Cor. 7.2 and vers 9. If they cannot abstaine let them marrie for it is better to marrie than to burne 4. But though this libertie be given to use the remedie yet there must bee a temperate sobrietie and moderation both in the use of mariage that they doe not give themselves over to fleshly delight but sometime sequester themselves to fasting and prayer 1 Cor. 7.5 And a comely decencie must bee observed both in first and second mariages not hastily and greedily to fall into them as among the Romans Numa made a law that a woman should not marrie within ten moneths after her husbands death Vrsin 2. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this precept IN this Commandement under one speciall kinde of adulterie all other acts of uncleannesse whatsoever are restrained and whatsoever belongeth unto chastitie is prescribed and commanded as these three vertues principally 1. Chastitie 2. Shamefastnes 3. Temperance The contrarie unto which vertues likewise are forbidden 1. Chastitie is commanded which is a vertue keeping both the soule and bodie chaste avoiding and shunning all uncleannesse and unlawfull lust both in mariage and in the single estate as also all causes occasions opportunities egging and provoking thereunto as likewise the effects and inconveniences that ensue thereon So the Apostle teacheth This is the will of God even your sanctification that yee should abstaine from fornication that every one of you should know how to possesse his vessell in holinesse and honour not in the lust of concupiscence c. 1 Thess. 4.3 4. Contrarie unto this vertue of chastitie are 1. Such kinds of inordinate lust as are against even this nature of ours as it is corrupt as first the confusion of divers kindes as when men are given over to vile affections to defile themselves with bâ—uit beasts Secondly the abuse of the sex as when men with men worke filthinesse which was one of the sinnes of the heathen Rom. 1.28 Likewise may the feminine sex bee abused Rom. 1.27 Thirdly when as the lawfull sex is used but in too neere a degree as in incest all these are unnaturall lusts and deserve of the Magistrate to bee extraordinarily punished 2. Other kindes of lusts there are which proceed from this our corrupt nature 1. Fornication betweene parties not married when as one with one committeth follie or which is more odious one with many which is the vile practice of strumpets and whores 2. Adulterie either the one partie being married and it is called adulterium simplex simple adulterie or both which is adulterium duplex double adulterie 3. There are beside these evill inclinations of the heart and inward inflammations which the godly doe resist by prayer and cut off the occasions of them and the remedie against this kind of lust is mariage according to S. Pauls rule It is better to marrie then to burne 1 Cor. 7.9 4. Shamefastnesse is here required which abhorreth all kind of turpitude and uncleannesse being alwaies accompained with a certaine griefe and feare lest any thing uncomely should bee committed such was the shamefastnes of Ioseph that being entised often by his shamelesse Mistresse would not afterward come into her companie Contrarie hereunto are 1. Immodestie and unshamefastnesse such as was in Herodâ—as daughter that came in impudently and danced before Herod and the rest that were at the table 2. Obscenitie and uncomelinesse in word or in deed as in Iosephs Mistresse that was not ashamed to move him with her owne mouth to lie with her 3. Temperance is also commanded which is a moderate and sober use of such things as belong unto the bodie as meat and drinke agreeable for the time place and
the oxe is specially mentioned because the Hebrewes were most given to keeping of cattell their horse were for the most part brought out of Egypt Simler 2. It is understood to be such a goring and wounding as that death followed upon it for otherwise though one were sore wounded with the push of an oxe if he died not the oxe was not in this case to be stoned Tostat. 3. But that other conceit of Tostatus in this place is not so good secus est si calce petierit c. It is otherwise if the oxe strike with his heele not with his horne in this case the oxe is not to die because it was his fault that stood within the reach of the oxes heele whereas he pursueth after men to gore them with his horne for what saith he then to the horse heele if any were stricken to death therewith was not the horse to be killed by the equitie of this law as Lippoman expoundeth it as well de equo calcitroso of a striking horse as of a pushing oxe If this law provideth for the stroke of the horse heele why not for the oxe hee le also And this is yet more evident Gen. 9.5 that the Lord will require mans bloud at the hand of every beast the heele is as well the oxe hand as his horne By what meanes soever then a beast killeth a man this law was to take place QUEST LXIII Why the oxe that goared was commanded to be stoned to death Vers. 28. THe oxe shall be stoned to death c. 1. Though a bruit beast cannot sinne and therefore this punishment is not inflicted for any sinne committed by the beast yet it is in joyned ad horrorem facti for the horror of the fact Tostat. 2. Quia esset horribilis ad videndum c. Because the sight of such a bloodie beast would be horrible and grievous to men Lyran. 3. And it might be feared lest such a dangerous beast if he should live should kill others also Simler 4. This was also provided for the masters advantage who was bound to make good all losses which should fall out afterward by his beast which used to push Tostat. 5. And by this law men are given to understand that if bruit beasts are not spared much lesse shall they goe unpunished if they shed mans bloud Gallas 6. The equitie also of this law herein appeareth that sicut creati sunt boves in hominum gratiam c. That as oxen were created for mans sake so they should serve for the use of man whether by their life or death Calvin 6. Agreeable to this law of Moses as grounded upon the law of nature were the like constitutions among the Heathen as Solon made a law in Athens that if a dogge had bitten a man hee should be tied in an halter and delivered to him that was hurt So among the Romanes in their 12. tables it was decreed that if a beast had done any hurt Dominus aut litis astimationem solvito aut eam noxa dedito The owner should either pay aâ— was awarded or deliver up his beast to punishment Draco also was the author of this law in Athens that not onely men but beasts yea things without life that had beene the meanes of any mans death should be banished out of the countrie and cast out whereupon the image of Theogenes among the Thrasians falling upon one and killing him was adjudged to be cast into the Sea Simler QUEST LXIV Why the flesh of the oxe was not to be eaten ANd his flesh shall not bee eaten 1. It was neither lawfull for them to eat the flesh themselves nor yet to sell it to the Gentiles as they might doe other things that died alone Deut. 1â— 21 Iun. But the flesh should be cast away as a cursed and abominable thing 2. Not so much because being stoned to death it was as a thing suffocated and so they should have eaten it with the bloud Simler Osiander But tanquam aliquid maledictum c. as a thing accursed they were to abhorre the flesh of such a bloudie beastâ— so that although the owner should slay this murtherous oxe before it were stoned it was not lawâ—ull to eat the flesh thereof Tostat. quaest 30. 3. And this was tum propter horrorem factâ— both for the horror of the fact tum quia per hoc damnificabatâ—â— Dominus bovis and by this meanes also the owner of the oxe was damnified the flesh thereof being unprofitable for any thing that he might be more â—autelâ—â—â— afterward and take better heed to his cattell Lyranus 4. The Hebrewes addâ— further that the very skin of the oxe was not to be used to any purpose but the whole to be cast away as a thing abominable Tostat. quaest 28. QUEST LXV In what case the owner is to die when his oxe goared any to death Vers 29. IF the oxe were wont to push c. Another case is put when the oxe chanceth to doe any hurt with the masters knowledge where divers conditions are required 1. That the oxe used to push before the words are in the originall yesterday and yeâ— yesterday a definite time is put for an indefinite it is noâ— enough if he had once goared before but he must have one it twice at the least as R. Salomon Lyran. He must have beene knowne in former time to have beene used to push 2. This also must have beene notified and signified also to the owner for it may be that the oxe had used formerly to push and the owner knew it not Simler Or if he knew it he might denie it unlesse he had beene admonished by others to take care of his beast Tostat. quaest 28. 3. He or she must be free and not a servant whom the oxe used to push goareth to death for concerning the goaring of servants there followeth another law afterward vers 32. If the oxe goared a man or woman a sonne or daughter that is though they were never so little it was all one Lyran. Some thinke it is understood of the owners owne sonne and daughter Calvin Oleaster But the next law as touching the goaring of servants sheweth that it is rather meant of his neighbours sonne or daughter Hugo de S. Victor But it is rather understood in generall de quo viâ— capite libero of every free bodie great or small man or woman Iun. 4. In this case the owner being warned before of his oxe is to die for it because he did not keepe him in knowing him to be a harmefull beast Quia videtur illud quasi immittere aliorum cervicibus because he seemed of purpose to let him loose to doe mischiefe Simler QUEST LXVI When the owner might redeeme his left with money Vers. 30. IF there be set to him a summe of money 1. R. Salomon thinketh that in this case the next of kin to the partie slaine were to take a peece of money of the owner of the oxe and they
all the smaller cattell as well sheepe and goats as lambâ— and 〈◊〉 2. And beside the facility easinesse and readinesse of theft other things are to be respected as the worth and price of the thing stollen and the boldnesse and impudency of the theefe 6. Wherefore these reasons rather may be yeelded 1. Quia frequâ—ntius furtâ— subtraâ—ebantur 〈◊〉 It might be that it was a more frequent and usuall thing to steale oxen among the Hebrewes than sheepes and therefore God would restraine the more usuall theft by the greater punishment Tostat. 2. In hâ—c dominium majus â—adacia major In this theft of oxen the losse was greater to the owner when his exe was stollen and the boldnesse of the theefe greater 〈…〉 esse Such a theefe as should steale oxen had need be bold and cunning because such a theft cannot so easily be hid as of sheepe 3. Ab. Ezra also giveth this reason because when a sheepe is stollen the owner loseth but his sheepe but in the other theft 〈…〉 he loseth his oxe and the labour of his oxe this reason also is approved by Oleaster 〈◊〉 Gallasâ—â—â— But Tostatus taketh this exception that iâ— the losse of the oxeus labour â—e accounted here in the restitution of five-fold why should it not be respected as well when the thing stollen is found with the theefe in which â—ase he was to pay but two-fold qu. 2. The answer here is ready because where the oxe is found though thâ—â—e â—e an intermission of his labour yet there is hope of restitution againe so is there not here the oxe being killed or sold. 7. Iosephus thinketh that this Law extendeth it selfe also to other cattell in the fields as to goats as well as sheepe though they be not here 〈◊〉 But concerning the asse or horse because they are not so easily stollen being kept in the house Tostatus thinketh that the Law of two-fold restitution tooke place as in the stealing of houshold stuffe and other moveable goods But it is more like recording to the rule observed before in other Lawes that by one kinde the rest are understood and these two the oxe and sheepe are given â—n â—ssistance as the most usuall and common beasts unto which all other great and small cattell should be reduced as afterward vers 4. direct mention is made of the asse QUEST III. Of the divers punishment of theft and whether it may be capitall NOw concerning the punishment of theft 1. The licentious liberty of the Lacedemonians is much to be misliked who punished not theft at all because they thought it was a meanes to traine and exercise their people in the practice of warre Gallas for it being a Morall law Thou shalt not steale and so grounded upon the Law of nature it ought not by any contrary custome to be discontinued 2. Neither is that Law of Solâ—â— which the Romans also inserted into their twelve Tables to be altogether approved aâ—â—â—ing opposite to Moses Law for they punished manifest theft with foure-fold when the theefe was taken in the manner whereas Moses setteth it but at two-fold and theft not manifest when the theefe is not found with the thing that was stollen they censured with restitution of two-fold whereas Moses chargeth such offence with foure-fold because such an one as hath sold or killed the stollen good hath added sinne to sinne having no purpose of restitution nor there being any possibility thereof Herein therefore the Law of Moses is more equall than the other 3. The Law also of Draco is too severe which punished theft with death the Scythians did so also but they had some reason for it because they had no houses or places of defence for their cattell so that if theft among them had not beene most severely punished nothing could have beene safe 4. Nor yet am I of their opinion that thinke that lex Mosis non pertinet ad politiam nostram the Law of Moses doth not at all belong to the policie of Common-wealths now Lippom. Non sumus alligati ad leges Iudaicas forenses That we are not bound how to the Jewes Civill lawes at all Osiand but that Magistrates may increase the externall punishment whether by death or otherwise as the circumstance of time quality and condition of the people require Contra. 1. As we are not strictly tied in every point to Moses Judicials so yet the equity thereof remaineth still which chiefly consisteth in this in the due measuring and weighing of the nature of sinnes which are thought to be worthy of death 2. Punishments externall may be increased which concerned either pecuniary mulcts or other bodily chastisement not touching the life as Moses punished theft with foure-fold but afterward the sinne increasing it was set at seven-fold Prov. 7.31 Pelarg. 3. But whereas mans life is only at Gods disposition this may be safely affirmed that no humane Law can take away the life of man for any offence without either generall or particular warrant and direction from Gods Law as is more at large before declared p. 4 5. 5. And yet I cannot consent to those that thinke no theft at all ought to be punished by death for even by Moses Law a violent theft as in breaking up of an house was judged worthy of death it was lawfull to kill such a theefe vers 2. Againe sacrilegious theft was likewise punished in the same manner as Iakob giveth sentence that they should not live that had stollen Labans gods Gen. 31.32 So Achan was put to death for stealing the excommunicate thing Iosh. 7. Theft committed of wantonnesse and without mercie David adjudgeth unto death 2 Sam. 12. vers 6. Chrysostome thinketh that David legem est praetergressus exceeded the Law in that he commandeth beside the restitution of foure-fold the man to be slaine and he calleth it supereffluentem justitiam overabounding justice But the Law of God did beare out David in it for he which did sinne presumptuously and with an high hand that is of malice and obstinacie was to dye for it Numb 15.30 Such was the sinne of the rich man whose case there is propounded which having many sheepe himselfe tooke away the poore mans sheepe by violence and had no pity Further he that did steale a man was to dye for it by the Law of Moses vers 16. So that it is evident even by Moses Judiciall lawes that some kinde of theft deserved death By the Romane Lawes also as is extant in their 12. Tables servants convicted of manifest theft were first beaten and then cast downe headlong from the rocke By the Imperiall lawes a theefe for the first offence was whipped then if he offended againe he lost his eares and the third time he was hanged in Anithent ut nulli Iudici c. for now such a theefe sinneth of obstinacie and malice and contempt against the Lawes and Magistrate and may by the Law of God be worthily put to death Simler So likewise such thefts whereby the
betweene Christ and Moses and betweene the new and old Testament which both command us to love our enemies Therefore Chrysostome is deceived who thinketh that those precepts Thou shalt love thy friend and hate thine enemie terrenâ— carnali populo secundùm tempus datae sunt were given unto the earthly minded and carnall people according to the time and that Christ gave another rule in the Gospell to love our enemies for it is evident that this law commandeth us even to love our enemies And the Wise-man more evidently in the Proverbs sheweth the same chap. 25.21 If thine enemie be hungrie give him bread to eat if he be thirstie give him water to drinke c. Therefore we see that Christ in the Gospell non ferat novam legem sed veterem tantum exponat doth not make a new law but onely expoundeth the old Lippoman That therefore was no precept of the law but the Pharisies glosse That they should love their friends and hate their enemies QUEST VIII Whether it is to be read Thou shalt helpe him or lay it aside with him Vers. 5. THou shalt lay it aside with him 1. The most doe here reade Thou shalt helpe him up with it This sense followeth Calvine Cajetane Osiander Paguine as the like law is extant Deut. 22.4 Thou shalt lift them up with him But the word ghazab is seldome found in that sense but signifieth ordinarily and properly to leave or forsake 2. Therefore it is best translated Thou shalt leave or lay aside the burthen that the asse which cannot rise under his burthen it being put aside may the better stand up upon his legges But this sense being retained there are divers readings used and interpretations given 1. Some reade it with an interrogation Wilt thou indeed leave it with him Vatablus Oleaster and so understand here a negative to answer the interrogation Nequaquam No thou shalt not 2. Some reading this clause without an interrogation and understand it of the leaving or laying aside of his hatred or enmitie So the Chalde 3. But the best reading is to pronounce it without an interrogation as Montanuâ— and to referre it to the burthen of the beast as is before shewed omnino depâ—nito cum eo put it aside together with him that is thine enemie Iunius 4. And though mention be made onely of easing the asse under his burthen yet all other the like kinde of helpe is understood as if the beast be otherwise in danger as like to bee strangled or drowned whether hee have a burthen or not in these cases 〈…〉 QUEST IX How the poore mans cause is perverted in judgement QUEST IX Against lying in judgement and how it may be committed QUEST XI Who are meant here by the just and innocent Vers. 7. THou shalt not slay the innocent and the righteous 1. This is to be understood of slaying by giving sentence against such judicially for out of judgement neither is the guiltie and unrighteous person to be slaine Cajetane 2. R. Salomon by the innocent understandeth him that is cleere in his owne conscience but yet condemned by false witnesses that the Judges in this case when an innocent partie goeth from them condemned if any doe stand up to cleere them as Daniel did for Susanna they should be heard By the just he would have understood him that is indeed guiltie but yet freed in publike judgement that in this case if any doe appeare to prove him guiltie hee should not be admitted c. But the righteous and innnocent are here taken for all one as it may appeare by the opposite part I will not justifie a wicked man the innocent and righteous is set against the wicked And beside it is as acceptable to God to punish the wicked man as to cleere and set free the innocent 3. Cajetane and Tostatus make this difference Mundus est qui non commisit hòmicidium c. Hee is the cleane and innocent man which hath not committed murther adulterie or any such crime he is the just and righteous man which hath done some just thing or some good worke But this distinction is here too curious and unnecessarie for men use not to bee brought in question for their good works but for evill whereof they are either justly or wrongfully accused and so David taketh both these for the same Psal. 4.8 Iudge me O Lord according to my righteousnesse and according to mine innocencie that is in me 4. God therefore here forbiddeth Judges to condemne the innocent for guiltie as Naboth was Susanna and Ieremie with the rest of the Prophets Gallas 5. Judges are not to condemne the innocent Etiam si à superiori Iudice jubâ—â—mur c. Though they should be commanded by the superiour Judge as the Elders of Israel put Naboth to death at the commandement of Iezabel Lippoman QUEST XII In what sense God is said not to justifie the wicked FOr I will not justifie the wicked 1. Some make this to be the meaning of this reason that God would have Judges looke unto him in whose place they are that as God doth not justifie the wicked nor condemne the righteous so neither should Judges Marbach Pelarg. 2. R. Salomon maketh this the sense according to his former exposition taking the just for him which is so in the triall of mans judgement yet guiltie in his conscience and before God that yet the Judge should not put such an one to death for though he be freed by the judgement of man yet he cannot escape the hands of God he will not justifie him But this exposition is overthrowne before that a just man is not here taken in that sense 3. Therefore this rather is a menacing speech that God will be avenged even of the unrighteous Judge Iun. Quicunque impie facit sive suo sive alieno arbitrio c. Whosoever doth wickedly either of his owne minde or following anothers direction the Lord will punish it Lippoman QUEST XIII Whether a Iudge ought alwayes to follow the evidence when he himselfe knoweth the contrarie BUt here ariseth a great and weightie question whether a Judge knowing in his owne conscience that the man which is accused before him is innocent and yet he is by the witnesses and other evidence found guiltie whether he is bound to give sentence according to the evidence against his owne knowledge and whether in so doing he sinneth not 1. The affirmative part is maintained by Thomas Paulus Burgens Tostatus who putteth in these cautions that the Judge knowing the partie to bee innocent as a private person yet is to use all meanes to have the truth come to light as by giving some secret intimation to the partie accused how to defend himselfe by fifting and examining the witnesses narrowly to see if he can make them to disagree and so overthrow their testimonie and if all this will not serve to referre the matter to the superiour Judge but if he have no superiour then hee
is bound to give sentence secundum allegata according to the evidence in hoc casu Index non peccat ferendo sententiam mortis and in this case they resolve that the Judge sinneth not in giving sentence of death against the innocent party Their reasons are these 1. Index non interficit ipsum sed illi qui accusant The Judge that giveth sentence doth not slay him but they wich accuse him Thomas Like as a man holding a sword in his hand another commeth and moveth his hand with the sword and so killeth a man Non est reus qui tenebat gladium He is not guiltie which held the sword Tostat. Answ. 1. Though the false accusers are the chiefe in this action yet the Judge is accessarie because he consenteth unto them otherwise Pilate that washed his hands and knew Christ to be innocent should not have sinned in condemning Christ. 2. That instance of one holding a sword is nothing like for his hand is used against his will and he himselfe acteth nothing but the Judge is an agent And the case is like as if one having a sword in his hand should be urged himselfe to kill one whom he knew to be innocent for then he should be guiltie of the murther 2. Solius est Dei judicare secundum veritatem quam ipse cognoscit It belongeth to God onely to judge according to the truth which he knoweth in himselfe But the Judge must not be informed according to that which he knoweth as a private person but as it appeareth unto him publikely in judgement Burgens Answ. It doth not follow but the contrarie rather that because the Lord judgeth according to the truth the Magistrate being in Gods place should doe the like also not to give sentence against the truth as Iehosaphat said unto his Officers and Judges Yee execute not the judgements of man but of the Lord 2 Chron. 19.6 3. Argum. He that judgeth against the law sinneth but the Judge not following his evidence judgeth against the law therefore he herein should sinne Tostat. Answ. Hee that absolveth an innocent man condemned by false witnesses goeth not against the intendment of the law which would have no innocent man condemned and all false witnesses to be punished 4. Argum. If the Judge should cleere the innocent man condemned by false witnesses he should by this meanes defame the witnesses as false men which hee is not able to prove and this would breed a great scandall Answ. 1. Of two evils the lesse is to be taken better were it for the witnesses to run into infamie than an innocent man to lose his life 2. Neither would any scandall arise at all for the Judges knowledge and credit may sway against the good name of the witnesses who by other circumstances may also easily be detected as the Judge may handle the matter 5. Argum. Involuntarie actions deserve neither praise nor dispraise altogether whether they be committed through ignorance or by violence but they helpe to excuse Therefore the Judge which followeth the publike evidence though he know the contrarie himselfe is to be excused because he is both simply forced by the law so to doe and he is in part ignorant quia nescit ut Iudex because as a Judge he knoweth it not though he know it as a private person Tostat. qu. 6. Answ. Ignorance cannot excuse the Judge at all in this case because he was an eye witnesse to the contrarie neither is there any such violence offred for he might rather leave his place and office than to bee compelled to give unjust sentence Now the contrarie part namely the negative that the Judge is not to give sentence against his owne knowledge and that in so doing he should sinne is maintained by Lyranus and Matthias Toring the Replier to Burgensis upon these reasons 1. Lyranus urgeth this sentence of Augustine Quomodo apud divinam providentiam à peccato liberi sunt c. How can they be free from sinne before the divine providence which for those things which are to bee contemned are polluted with mans bloud c. His meaning is that a Judge rather than hee would leave his place of honour and wealth should not give a wrong sentence to shed the bloud of the innocent mans life ought to be more precious than any other worldly thing whatsoever as it is said Ioh 2.4 All that a man hath will he give for his life therefore in this case if there be no superiour Judge to deliver the innocent partie debet priùs dignitatem dimittere c. he should rather give over his dignitie than give sentence against the innocent Tostatus answereth that he should doe well to give over his place unlesse some inconvenience should ensue as in this case there would for infamaret testes he should by this meanes defame the witnesses Contra. 1. But a greater inconvenience would follow if he doe it not both the innocent partie shall be condemned and the Judge commit a great sinne before God 2. Neither is here any inconvenience to be feared at all for by this meanes false witnesses should be detected not defamed for they are worthie of all disgrace and infamie for their falsehood 2. Argum. The Apostle saith Whatsoever is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 But a Judge giving sentence against his knowledge and conscience cannot doe it of faith therefore therein he sinneth Burgens answereth that a Judge in those things which concerne his private person may informe his conscience by his private knowledge but in publicke matters he is to take his information by publicke evidence Contra. True it is if that publicke information be not against the truth which he knoweth in his conscience otherwise he sinneth because his action is not then of faith which rule of the Apostle serveth not onely for private but for publike actions also 3. Si privata persona peccat publica non eximitur c. If a mans private person sinneth his publike is not exempted Thoring This respect of private and publike is before man but the judgement of sinne belongeth unto God A politike humane respect cannot dispense then with a sinne against God 4. To these reasons may bee added that saying of the Wise-man which is most evident Deliver them that are drawne to death and wilt thou not preserve them that are led to be slaine If thou say Behold wee knew not of it he that pondereth the hearts doth not he understand it Here all they are found guiltie before God which doe not deliver the innocent from death if private men negligent herein are condemned much more the publike Judge And this place meeteth with that curious distinction that as he is Judge he knew it not though he knew it as a private man for if he knew it in his conscience and before God it is enough to convince him before him that searcheth the heart 5. And if it were so then a Judge condemning an innocent man
conceit and collection is of no great force 2. Tostatus opinion herein is better that this vaile Quod ponitur ante sancta sanctorum which was put before the most holy place was that which is called Matth. 27. the vaile of the Temple and was rent in sunder and hereby saith he was signified that those things quae erant in veteri lege occultata which were hid in the old Law are by Christs death revealed quaest 14. And that it was the second not the first vaile it thus appeareth because in Salomons Temple there was but one vaile made which was drawen before the most holy place whereof mention is made 2 Chron. 3. and so Iosephus witnesseth lib. 8. cap. 2. To this purpose Ribera And the Syrian Interpreter in that place of Matth. 27.51 calleth the vaile facies portae the face of the gate Quia ingredientibus frontis instur in oculos incurreret because it confronted those which came in by the gate and looked them as it were full in the face Iun. ibid. So also reverend Beza upon the same place Aulaeum intelligit quo dividebantur sancta sanctorum à sancto Hee understandeth the curtaine or vaile whereby the most holy place was divided from the holy place And the Apostle otherwise interpreteth the second vaile than Thomas doth applying it to the opening of the way to the holiest of all that is to the kingdome of heaven Which was not opened while the first Tabernacle was standing This vaile was then rent by Christ in that by him the way is opened unto everlasting life QUEST XXXI Of the mysticall sense of these vailes THe mysticall application followeth of these vailes 1. By the inward vaile is set forth unto us the glorious heavens whereunto Christ is entered to appeare in the sight of God for us as the Apostle expoundeth Hebr. 9.24 As the Priest entred once in the yeare into the most holy place The same sense followeth Beda and Rupertus So that these two parts of the Sanctuary have a signification of the Church triumphant in heaven and of the militant Church in earth which is nourished by the word of God and the Sacraments in the hope of everlasting life as in the outward part of the Tabernacle was set the candlesticke on the one side and the table with the shew-bread on the other 2. Augustine saith the former vaile and Tabernacle was Figura veteris Testamenti a figure of the old Testament and the second vaile with the most holy place was a figure of the new Testament whereby is signified that Christ hath removed the vaile which shadowed the most holy place and opened by his bloud the way unto everlasting life which could not be opened by the sacrifices of the Law as the Apostle sheweth Hebr. 9.8 3. The Apostle also by the vaile understandeth the flesh of Christ which vailed and shadowed his Divinity by the which vaile he hath made a new and living way so that by his bloud we may be bold to enter into the holy place Heb. 10.19 20. 4. By the vaile may be understood that separation which was betweene the Church of the Jewes and the Gentiles which division and wall of partition is now removed by Christ who hath made of both one Ephes. 2.14 Marbach Pelarg. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The Church is knowne by the Word and Sacraments Vers. 35. THou shalt set the table without the vaile Beda by the table of shew-bread understandeth the table of Christ and the Sacraments of the Church by the candlesticke the light of Gods word by the which two the Church of God militant in earth is discerned and knowne So also Simler by the same would have understood mensam Domini lucem verbi Dei the table of the Lord and the light of Gods word And as the table was never empty but alwayes had bread so saith the prodigall child In my fathers house is bread enough Luk. 15. there is the spirituall food of our soules to be had 2. Doct. That none intrude themselves into the office of teaching without calling Vers. 36. ANd thou shalt make an hanging for the doore of the Tabernacle c. This vaile was to keepe off the people from entring into the holy place whither the Priests had accesse for their daily service and ministery which sheweth that none should take upon them that Priestly function but such as are thereunto called and appointed Ne quis se temerè ingerat ad docendum that no man should rashly thrust himselfe into the office of teaching Osiander As the Apostle saith No man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron Hebr. 5.4 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against the Iewes Vers. 33. THou shalt hang the vaile c. Chrysostome urgeth this place against the Jewes Sicut gloria domus est ubi velum pendet c. As it was the glory of the house where the vaile hanged and while it hanged so the renting of the vaile of the Temple in two ignominia templi est is the ignominy and shame of the Temple and sheweth that the Spirit of God is departed from them c. Like as while the Tabernacle stood and the vaile was whole and sound it shewed that they had the presence of God and he had not yet forsaken his habitation among them So the parting and dividing of the vaile testified that the Lord had dissolved their state and would no more dwell among them as our blessed Saviour foretold them Behold your house is left unto you desolate Luk. 13.35 2. Confut. Against the superstitious usage of the Romanists in the division of their Churches BY this hanging up of the two vailes which made two parts of the Sanctuary and the outward court made the third whither the people only were admitted Bellarmine would warrant the distinction observed in their Churches or Temples dividing it into the porch or entrence the body of the Church and the queere which they say resembleth the holy place to the which none were suffered to enter of the lay people but onely their clerkes and queere-men And to this purpose they used in time of Lent to draw a curtaine in the middest of the chancell to represent this vaile which was spred before the most holy place B. Babington Contra. 1. To follow the paterne of Moses Tabernacle or Salomons Temple for comelinesse and decencie and due proportion of building in Churches is not unlawfull for Christians but it is a thing indifferent any thing for comelinesse sake may be imitated and borrowed from the example of former times 2. But two wayes the Romanists offend in this imitation both because they make a superstitious distinction of places thinking the queere or chancell to be a place of greater holinesse and in making a difference of the people as though some were more holy than others and not fit to enter into the holy place whereas Christ hath made
foundation as there were two sockets under every boord by the bars are understood the Ministers and teachers of the Gospell by whose preaching the frame of the Church is held together 3. The two vailes did both keepe the people from curious gazing and bold accesse which admonisheth us that we must not draw neere unto God without great reverence 4. The large outward court did represent and prefigure the vocation of the Gentiles which should be called in great multitudes whereas the Church of the Jewes was straitned and pent up in a small corner Simler 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. There is no salvation but in Christ. Vers. 1. THou shalt make the Altar The Israelites had but one onely Altar appointed upon the which they were to offer all their sacrifices and therefore both Ieroboam sinned that afterward set up two other Altars one in Dan the other in Beersheba and Vrias the high Priest who to please the idolatrous King Ahaz caused a new Altar to be set up after the patterne of the Altar of Damascus This one Altar was a type of our blessed Saviour who onely satisfieth for our sinnes neither are we to use any other helpes in our owne works or in the merits or mediation of Saints beside Christ for this were nothing else Quam aliud novum Altare prater Christum instituere Then to appoint another new Altar beside Christ who onely is ordained of God to bee the Saviour of the world Marbach As S. Peter saith Neither is there salvation in any other for among men there is given no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved Act. 2.12 2. Doct. That all things should be done orderly in the Church Vers. 9. THou shalt make the court of the Tabernacle We learne by this that Nihil in Ecclesia confusum esse debet Nothing in the Church must be confused but all disposed in order as in the Tabernacle the outward court was appointed for the Levits and vulgar sort the holy place for the Priests the most holy place none could enter into but the high Priest So now in the Church of God all things should be done in comelinesse and order Our assemblies should be orderly and reverently set and disposed Distinction of degrees and persons to be observed not all confusedly shuffled together as now in many Churches men and women one with another are mingled together Oleaster This is S. Pauls rule that all things be done honestly and by order 1 Cor. 14.40 3. Doct. The mysteries of Christian religion are manifested to all Vers. 16. IN the gate of the court shall bee a vaile of twentie cubits Although the court were compassed about with curtaines yet Ostium satis amplum habuit It had a doore wide enough thorow the which they might see all the breadth of the Tabernacle and the Hebrewes thinke that the curtaines were made with holes Quibus ea quae in atrio agebantur conspici potuerint Whereby such things as were done in the court might be seene By the which is signified that the holy mysteries of the Church are not such as the ceremonies of Ceres of Eleusis which were not imparted to strangers or of Iuno of Coos unto the which servants were not admitted but the secrets of the Gospell are revealed to all the world Pelargus Lippoman As the Apostle saith If our Gospell bee hid it is hid to them that are lost 2 Cor. 4.3 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against free will in good things Vers. 4. THou shalt make unto it a grate like networke c. Beda thinketh that the fire was made under tbis grate and that thorow the holes thereof the flame ascended and consumed the sacrifice whereupon he giveth this note Nequaquam obduremus corda nostra more Pelagianorum c. sed liberè aperiamus c. Let us not harden our hearts and locke them up as the Pelagians against the grace of God but so open them that as thorow many doores in all things that we begin well the grace of God may illuminate us c. And he sheweth what the error of the Pelagians was Sâ—â—e gratia Dei se aliquid boni perficere posse praesumunt They presume they can without the grace of God doe some good thing And so they doe not set a grate before their hearts for the sacred fire of Gods Spirit to enter Sed quasi parietem solidum inter se ignâ—m Spiritus sancti interponunt But doe put a thickâ— wall betweene them and the sire of the holy Spirit lest they should be heated thereby and warmed with love With the Pelagians herein consent the Romanists whose assertion is this That a man naturally without faith both with speciall assistance from God and without it can performe some morall good worke if no temptation let Bellarmin But against both these may be opposed that saying of our blessed Saviour Without me can ye doe nothing Ioh. 15.5 See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. err 43. 2. Confut. Against Altars in Popish Churches Vers. 7. THe bars shall be in the two sides of the Altar c. This Altar was a type and figure of Christ and it was to continue till Christ the true Sacrificer should offer himselfe upon the Altar of the crosse But now the Church of God knoweth no such materiall Altars as Rupertus well observeth this Altar was holy Antequam Christus qui per hoc promittebatur veniret c. before Christ came who was promised by it but after that he is entred into the most holy place Nunc reprobatum abjectum est Now it is repelled and rejected The Romanists therefore doe Judaize in retaining still Altars in their Churches Antiquitie knew no such Altars of stone as Celsus as Origen saith objected it as a fault among the Christians Quod nec imagines nec Templa nec aras haberent That they had neither images Temples nor Altars Augustine calleth it Mensam Domini The table of the Lord Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The holy boord Athanasius Mensam ligneam The table of wood B. Babing Neither have they any colour for their Altars out of that place Heb. 13. We have an Altar whereof they have no authoritie to eat which serve in the Tabernacle c. For the Apostle there speaketh of no materiall Altar but of the death and passion of Christ as it followeth vers 12. And Bellarmin forbeareth to urge this place because divers of their owne writers apply it to Christs crosse lib. 5. de miss cap. 9. 3. Confut. Against the setting up of candles in the day in popish Churches Vers. 1. SHall dresse them from evening to morning The lamps burned in the Tabernacle onely in the night and were put out in the day as is before shewed quest 21. which sheweth that the Romanists are herein more superstitious than the Jewes in setting up candles and tapers by day in their Churches Hierom saith Ceras non clara luce accendimus c. We
QUEST XL. Whether all these rites were of the necessitie of the consecration Vers. 35 THou shalt do thus unto Aaron and to his sonnes c. 1. Some are of opinion that all things here prescribed to bee observed and done were de necessitate consecrationis of the necessitie of the consecration and if any thing were omitted the consecration was voide R. Salomon Lyranus But this is not like that if any thing were neglected in the manner of eating in respect of the place persons or time that their consecration should thereby have been void as Levit 10.17 Aaron being in griefe for the sudden death of Nadab and Abihu forgot the sinne offering which they should have eaten and suffered it to be all burnt and this was the eighth day after their consecration Levit. 9.2 when as yet the anointing was fresh upon them and they did not yet come forth of the doores of the Tabernacle Levit. 10.7 And yet notwithstanding this negligence there was no nullitie of Aarons consecration Tostat. quâ—st 18. 2. Therefore Tostatus opinion is rather to be received that some things were of necessitie in the consecration as the washing anointing of the Priests the putting on of the priestly apparell the sprinkling of themselves and their garments some things were only de solennitate belonging to the solemnitie of the consecration as the seething and eating of it in the holy place and eating it the same day it was a sin to omit any of these but thereby their consecration was not made voide QUEST XLI Why the consecration of the Priests continued seven daies Vers. 35. SEven daies shalt thou consecrate them c. 1. This consecration of the Priests was to continue seven daies together that both the Priests hereby might bee confirmed in their vocation and be assured thereof that they were thereunto appointed of God and that the people also might thereby take better notice that they were set apart by the Lord for that holy function Osiander 2. And further hereby thus much was signified that as the Priests seven daies together were consecrated so we per totum vitae curriculum throughout the whole course of our life should be consecrated and addicted to Gods service Simler Marbach 3. Likewise we are hereby admonished Pontificem continuo proficere non posse repente summum fieri c. that the Priest must daily increase and go forward that he cannot be made perfect at once that many gifts and graces are required in him Lippoman 4. It also sheweth that as their consecration was not perfect before the seventh day so we cannot attaine to perfection in this life Osiander QUEST XLII Whether all the sacrifices of the first day were iterated seven daies together or the sacrifice for sin only Vers. 36. ANd shalt offer everie day a calfe 1. Lyranus thinketh that not onely a calfe for a sinne offering was sacrificed everie day but two rammes also so that seven calves were offered and fourteene rammes in these seven daies So also Simler Borrh. Lippom. Pellican But seeing there is no mention made but only of the sinne offering we have no warrant to imagine any other sacrifice to have been iterated but that as belonging to their consecration 2. Iosephus thinketh yet more that all things were iterated every day which were done upon the first day as the anointing of them and the sprinkling of the Priests themselves and their garments But this is not like that their consecration was iterated it was sufficient for them once to be consecrated and seeing the ramme of consecration was killed onely upon the first day with the bloud whereof they were sprinkled they were so sprinkled but upon the first day 3. Tostatus his opinion is that the calfe which was the sacrifice for sinne and the consecration ramme were offered everie day expresse mention is made of the one and the other is implied in these words seven daies shalt thou fill their hands that is put into their hands part of the peace offering to be shaken to fro before the Lord as is prescribed vers 24. Now the ramme of burnt offering needed not to be daily offered during these seven dayes because there were every day morning and evening a lambe offered for a burnt sacrifice Sic Tostat. But this opinion cannot stand 1. Seeing Moses is bid to take two rams chap. 24.2 it is like that either both of them were â—â—nued every day or none 2. And the filling of their hands signifieth nothing else but the consecrating of their Ministery as is before shewed whereof the hand was the organe and instrument it is not literally to be pressed to signifie the putting of the things offered into their hands 4. Therefore according to the words of the text of all the sacrifices appointed for the first day onely the calfe which is the sinne offering is prescribed to be iterated and the reason is because it was to cleanse and purifie the Altar Levit. 8.15 But only in this sacrifice were the hornes of the Altar touched with bloud and so sanctified which was not done in any of the other sacrifices QUEST XLIII To what end the sinne offering was offered every day of the seven Vers. 36. THou shalt offer every day a calfe c. for reconciliation or to make atonement 1. This reconciliation was not only made for the sinne of the Priests as thinketh Tostatus for the hornes of the Altar were laid on with this bloud whereby it was purified Levit. 8.15 2. Neither yet was this sinne offering prescribed only ad expiandum Altare to cleanse the Altar as thinketh Osiander Calvin For he had said before seven dayes shalt thou consecrate them that is the Priests and then it followeth and shalt offer every day c. so that this daily offering for the space of seven dayes belonged unto the consecration of the Priests 3. Therefore the end of this sacrifice for sinne was both to make atonement for Aaron and his sonnes as also to purifie and cleanse the Altar Iunius QUEST XLIV How the Altar was cleansed and why Vers. 36. ANd thou shalt cleanse the Altar 1. After the consecration of the Priests is set forth their Ministery and service both at the Altar of burnt offering and in the golden altar in the next Chapter Here three things are declared concerning the Altar of burnt offering 1. How it should bee purified 2. What should bee offered thereon 3. The profit and benefit that should come thereby the Lord would there come unto them and speake with them vers 42. and dwell among them vers 45. Lyranus 2. Two things are required to the purifying of the Altar it must first be cleansed not that it was polluted of it selfe but to shew that in respect of man omnia corruptione naturae profana ob peccatum c. that all things by the corruption of our nature are profane because of sinne Gallas Marbach As also it was not only cleansed but sanctified and set apart for holy uses that
Sabbath formally who doth that which is expressely forbidden to bee done upon that day he materially breaketh it who doth a worke like unto that which is forbidden but yet is permitted by the law As if there were a law that no citizen should sell any thing to a stranger but such as were licensed to do it hee that so selleth being not allowed transgresseth the law formally he that doth it being thereunto licensed doth transgresse onely materially in that he doth the same thing which he committeth that transgresseth the law but not in that manner The same difference there was betweene the workes of the Priests which were allowed by the law upon the Sabbath day and the like workes of those which laboured in the building of the Tabernacle upon that day which were forbidden 3. Another difference is this the sacrifices belonged to the service of God which if they should have been intermitted upon the Sabbath the service of God should therby have been neglected But though the workes about the Tabernacle did cease upon the Sabbath Gods worship was not thereby neglected for they might as well be made upon other daies and so were 4. They were to do no servile works upon the Sabbath but many works necessarie for the building of the Sanctuarie were servile so were not the sacrifices and other duties performed by the Priests upon the Sabbath therefore the one were permitted upon the Sabbath and not the other Tostat. qu. 9. QUEST XIII How the Sabbath is said to bee a signe that the Lord did sanctifie them Vers. 13. IT is a signe betweene me and you that I the Lord do sanctifie you Which words are diversly expounded 1. Some make this the sense It is a signe that I sanctifie you in that I have separated you from other people selected you unto my self Vatab. Lyran. 2. Oleaster thus Sanctitas Sabbatâ— signum est munditia c. The holinesse of the Sabbath is a signe of cleanenesse which I require of you Vt ex dicato tempore Deo credamus magis nos ipsos dicuri Deo c. That by the time dedicated to God wee should know that wee our selves much more should be dedicated Cajetan But more is here signified than so the words implie an actuall sanctification not signified onely 3. Hierom saith it is so said because it was signum veri Sabbati a signe of the true Sabbath wherein wee shall rest from the labours of the world 4. So also Irenam Non sine symbole erant signa the signes were not without some symbole and signification Sabbatâ— perseverantiam totim diâ—i c. The Sabbaths holding our the whole day did signifie our continuance in Gods serâ—â—ce But here the Lord speaketh of an actuall sanctification not of a typicall signification 5. Some say it is so called quia signum erat â—udâ—ris because it was a signe of the Covenant whereby the people did bind themselves to worship the Lord for their God and such signes were all the other ceremonies Marbach But there is a morall consideration in the sanctifying of the Sabbath therefore it was otherwise a signe than the other ceremonies 6. It was then a common signe betweene God and them they holding God to be their God Creator and sanctifier because the Sabbath was a commemoration of the creation and the Lord taking them for his people whom he created redeemed and sanctified Iun. Tostat. 7. Beside the keeping of the Sabbath was a signe of difference between them and all other prophane people of the world who derided the Jewes for their Sabbaths as 〈◊〉 derided them for this Quod septimâ—m partem 〈…〉 Because they lost the seventh part of their age in resting every seventh day Tostat. qu. 10. 8. And specially it was a signe of their sanctification because that day they were sequestred by an holy rest from thinking or studying upon prophane things and in respect of the exercises of religion upon that day whereby they were sanctified sanctificaâ—â—r verbo Dei we are sanctified by the word of God Simler And they did meet together ad confirmandam 〈…〉 to confirme their faith by the sacraments Osiander And because every Sabbath discatiâ— doctrinam meam you learne my doctrine c. Iunius QUEST XIV The reasons why the Sabbath must be observâ—d Vers. 13. FOr it is a signe c. There are here divers reasons yeelded for the observation of the Sabbath 1. The first is à sine from the end it was a signe betweene God and them 2. Ab â—tili it is holy unto you that is ordained for your benefit and commoditie as our blessed Saviour saith Mark 2.27 The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Pelarg. So also Cajetan It is holy unto you that is ad vestrum bonum mandatur custodiendum it is appointed to be kept for your good 3. A necessarie from the necessitie of it because if they did not keepe it they should surely die as thrice the punishment of death is here threatned to those that defile the Sabbath and doe any worke therein Pelarg. 4. From the authoritie of the Institutor quia dicatur Domino c. because it is consecrated unto God vers 15. It is the Sabbath of the holy rest unto the Lord therefore it ought to be observed Cajetan 5. A facili from the easinesse of the precept the Lord appointeth but one day for the holy rest whereas he alloweth six for labour Pelargus 6. Ab exemplo Dei from Gods example who created the world in six daies and rested the seventh Pelarg. Simlerus 7. A consequenti from the event or consequent in observing the Sabbath efficient in succedentibus generationibus c. They shall procure that a perpetuall covenant shall be established in their generations betweene the Lord and their posteritie for ever Cajetan QUEST XV. What death is meant in this phrase He shall die the death Vers. 14. SHall die the death Whereas there are divers kinds of death there is everlasting death both of bodie and soule in the next world and the temporall death in this life either of the soule in being deprived of the life of grace or of the bodie either by the hand of God by sudden and extraordinarie death or by the hand of the Magistrate according to these divers kinds of death so is this place diversly interpreted 1. Some referre it to everlasting death and excluding from the societie of Gods servants Iun. 2. Some understand it of being deprived of the life of grace Vita gratiae destituetuâ— hic infuturo seculo c. He shall be destitute of the life of grace both here and in the next world Lippoman 3. Some of being excluded from the people of God no more to be counted an Israelite Eâ— Oleastr 4. Some of the violent death by the Magistrate Osiander Simler 5. Some of extraordinarie death when God cutteth one off and so punisheth him by death unlooked for as God is said
God could be made with mens hands 5. Therefore the plurall here is taken for the singular according to the Hebrew phrase Oleaster As so the Lord saith I have made thee Pharaohs god chap. 7.1 where the word is Elohim in the plurall and sometime a word of the plurall number is joyned with an adjective of the singular as Isai. 19.4 I will deliver the Egyptians into the hands adonim kasheh Dominorum duri of Lords hard where the adjective is put in the singular sometime the adjective that is joyned with it is put in the plurall also but the relative in the singular Iosh. 24.19 Elohim kadashim his he is holy gods that is an holy God so likewise sometime Elohim is put with a verbe singular as Gen. 1.1 Bara Elohim creavit Dii God created sometime with a verbe in the plurall as in this place asherjeeben which may goe before us So then Elohim gods in the plurall is here put for the singular Make us a god Tostat. qu. 4. QUEST VIII How the Israelites would have their god to be made to goe before them TO goe before us 1. It is evident by this wherefore they desired a visible god to be made not to that end that they might with greater libertie eat and drinke feast and play before the idoll which they could not doe before the Lord for the Lord did allow them to rejoyce before him in sober and seemely manner Nor yet because they bee like unto other nations to have some visible image to worship but they shew the end thereof that they might have some visible presence to goe before them Tostat. qu. 6. 2. And whereas Moses being absent they might have desired some other guide in his place to direct them they doe not so both because they know none could be given them like unto Moses and if such an one might be found he was subject to the like danger as they imagined Moses to be fallen into they desire rather some visible god to be given unto them Tostat. qu. 8. 3. Neither were they so senselesse to thinke that an idoll made of silver or gold which hath eyes and seeth not eares and heareth not could goe before them 4 And Tostatus conceit is too curious that because they had seene images in Egypt which had as they thought a certaine divine power in them speaking sometimes and making answer unto demands And among the rest the Egyptian God Apis which was like a pide bull did appeare once in a yeare unto them and used to goe before them unto Memphis and all the Egyptians followed after playing upon their harpâ— and other instruments he thinketh that the Israelites desired the like god to bee given them that they might have an image made endued with some divine power to goe before them But they never had seene any image in Egypt made with mens hands to stirre and move and walke before them The Egyptian god Apis was either a very pide pull indeed or the devill in that likenesse therefore they having seene no such president in Egypt it is not like they imagined any such thing 5. Wherefore these Elohim gods which they desire to be made were none other but images as Laban so calleth his little images gods Gen. 31. Gallas This then is the meaning that some image may be made them quae admoneret eos praesentiae divina which should admonish them of the divine presence Osiander And they say in effect but thus much Instituâ— nobis cultum c. Appoint us some kinde of worship that God may be reconciled unto us Vt pergat nos praecedere That he may go forward still before us as he hath begun Ferus So then their meaning is not that the idoll to be made should still goe before them but that God represented and reconciled thereby might goe on still with them QUEST IX Why the people came to Aaron rather than to Hur his fellow governour BUt it will bee here questioned why the people demand this rather of Aaron than of Hur who was joyned with him in the government chap. 24. 1. R. Salom. maketh this the reason because that the people had killed Hur because he resisted them and this he saith was the manner of his death al the people came and spet into his mouth and so choaked him But it is not like if Hur in so good a cause had given his life that it should have beene omitted Phinehes fact in slaying the adulterer and adulteresse is commended and honourable mention is made thereof but Hur had beene more worthie to have beene recorded for not killing but in suffering himselfe rather to bee killed in defence of Gods pure worship Tostat. qu. 3. 2. Neither yet is it to be supposed that Hur was dead for some mention then is like to have beene made of his death being a principall governour and of the peoples lamentation for him 3. Therefore although Hur may bee thought to have yeelded and consented to their motion as well as Aaron as not being a more holy man than hee yet because Aaron was the chiefe and more principall he onely is mentioned Tostat. qu. 3. QUEST X. Whether at this time the Israelites wanted the presence of the cloud FUrther whereas they desire gods to bee made to goe before them it will be here objected that they had the presence of the cloud which went before them and they therefore needed not to have had any other guide 1. Oleaster therefore thinketh that the cloud might at this time be taken out of their fight but this opinion is briefely confuted before quest 4. the cloud did not leave them till they came into the land of Canaan when the manna also ceased Iosh. 5. 2. Some make the blinde curiositie of the people the cause why they regarded not that ordinarie signe of Gods presence but requested some figure and representation of God answerable to their vanitie Calvin So also Chrysostom Adhuc iâ—spicis quod miraris oblitus es largitoris Thou seest daily that which thou wonderest at namely the manna which fell every morning and thou forgettest the giver 3. But this also may bee joyned to the former reason they had staied 40. dayes in a plat and the cloud stirred not they had continued as long in this place about mount Sinai even fortie dayes as they had beene in all the mansion places since their comming out of Egypt and so they might doubt that this cloud should be their direction no longer to goâ— before them into the promised land and therefore they desire another guide QUEST XI Why they say they knew not what was become of Moses Vers. 1. FOr of this Moses c. we know not what is become of him c. 1. R. Salom. thinketh they supposed he had beene dead and that Satan had made such an apparision in the aire as if they had indeed seene a coffin as if Moses had beene dead and his bodie put into it But if they
make any such ditch or trench Tostat. qu. 34. 2. Who therefore thinketh right that these gates were onely the places of entrance into the great streets which went thorow the camp for the host lay in such order as that they had wayes and streets betweene their tents as wee see now in cities and townes as Iosephus also describeth the situation and disposing of the camp 3. Now Moses stood in the gate or entrance not because the use was to give sentence and judgement in the gates Lyran. Borrh. Or because Moses would have the Levites to give the onset in the beginning of a street and so to go thorow as Tostat. ibid. But this was the reason Moses tabernacle or tent was without the camp and so upon that occasion Moses stood in the entrance of the camp going now to his owne tent Iun. QUEST LXVIII Whether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie Vers. 26. ANd all the sonnes of Levi. R. Salom. to whom consenteth Tostatus thinketh Quod nullus de Levitis aliquid peccaverit That none of the Levites sinned in this great transgression because it is said All the sonnes of Levi gathered themselves unto him and if the Levites had sinned â—s other tribes there had beene no more cause to advance them to the Priesthood than other tribes Contra. 1. If that generall particle all bee pressed then it would follow that the children and all came which could not be for they were not able to use swords the meaning then is not that all the Levites came but all which came were Levites Iun. Sa. Or all is taken for many as this speech is usually restrained in Scripture as all nations are said to have come and bought corne in Egypt Gen. 41. 2. The Levites were more of Gods favour and grace than of their desert separated and selected for the Priesthood yet it is evident that this tribe was freer from consenting to this idolatrie than other tribes and for this their courage and readinesse in Gods service they received a blessing 2. Some thinke that even these Levites which armed themselves against their brethren were not altogether immunes à reatu free from this sinne but while they did it for feare levius peccarunt their sin was the lesse and so the mercie of the Lord appeared so much the more not only in pardoning their sin sed gloriam suam eorum manu asserere dignatus est but he vouchsafed by their hand to maintaine his glory Calvin Simler But it is not like that God would use their ministerie in the punishing of others which were guiltie of the same punishment themselves and their owne conscience accusing them they would have had no such courage to revenge the Lords cause upon their brethren it had beene also verie offensive to the guiltie parties to be punished by them which had beene alike guiltie And Moses proclaiming who pertaineth to the Lord let him come to me did meane that they only should come who had beene faithfull unto God and had not consented to that sinne 3. Some Hebrewes doe help the matter thus that because they cannot avoid it but that some of the kindred of the Levites were guiltie of this transgression because they did not spare their owne sonnes vers 29. that because it was lawfull for any of the other tribes to take unto them the wives of Levites their husbands being dead those children which they had by them might be said to be the sons of Levi that is grand children on their mothers side But this shift is taken away because Deut. 33.9 it is said that the Levites knew not their owne father or mother or children therefore they must needs bee understood to be Levites not by marriage or in some removed degree of kindred unto them but the immediate fathers and sonnes of Levites 4. Therefore the best opinion is that all of the tribe of Levi were not free from this sin of idolatrie many of them kept themselves as it is like at home and consented not but that a great sort even of Levi offended it may thus appeare 1. Because both Aaron himselfe was a ring-leader who can by no meanes be excused from this sin Lyranus 2. It could not be avoided but that many of the Levites were drawne away by Aarons example Iun. 3. But yet it is more evident because they consecrated their hands upon their owne sonnes and brethren yea their fathers and mothers that divers of the tribe of Levi fell away with the rest Lyran. Iun. Tostatus here answereth that the name of brethren is taken largely Pro fratribus qui sunt de filiis Israel For their brethren which were of the children of Israel qu. 35. Contra. 1. If it be allowed that the name of brethren is sometime so taken what saith he to the other names of father mother sonne These must be taken for the names of kindred or else we shall never have any certaintie in Scripture when we should by these names understand naturall fathers mothers and children 2. The other words companion and neighbour shew that the first is a name of kindred the first word ach signifieth here a brother in affinitie the second râ—ah a companion and friend the third karob Vicinia ratione conjunctum him that was a neighbour in dwelling and vicinitie or neernesse of place Simlerus 5. It is evident then that some of the Levites were accessarie to this great impietie because they were punished among the rest So that R. Salomon is herein greatly deceived who thinketh that the Levites though they were blame-worthy in not resisting the idolaters yet were not idolaters themselves neither consensu mentis nec facto exteriori in consent of minde nor in any outward fact c. for the Levites had beene unjustly punished if they had beene innocent Nay R. Moses Egyptius goeth further saying that although the Israelites often are found to have committed idolatrie yet Levita nunquam idolatraverunt the Levites never committed idolatrie But the contrarie is evident by Aarons fall for hee apparantly was an idolater in his externall act in building an altar unto the golden Calfe and offering sacrifice before it Paulus Burgensis in his reply proceedeth yet further that when our blessed Saviour was put to death the Levites as they are distinguished from the Priests were not principeâ— in crimine illo pâ—ssimo principall agents in that wicked crime whereas it is evident that the Priests were the chiefe enemies that Christ had the Levites indeed are not named but seeing the high Priest with the other Priests which were of the tribe of Levi were the contrivers of Christs death then cannot that whole tribe be exempted from this villanous act which is the intendment of Burgensis a great favourer of that nation QUEST LXIX Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them Vers. 27. THus saith the Lord c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that it is not
before and this were but one Simler But the contrary appeareth Deut. 9.20 4. Therefore these may be the causes why Moses prayeth againe 1. The Lord granted before that he would not destroy all the people at once sed 〈◊〉 ex inâ—ervallo vel per partes but whether he would doe it in continuance of time and as it wore by peecemeale hee knew not which he prayeth for here Lippom. 2. And there might be other sinnes as well as this for the which the Lord should be angry with them as Deut. 9.18 he saith he prayed and fasted because of all their sins Tostat. 3. And now he prayeth not only for the turning away or judgements but that the Lord would be againe fully reconciled unto his people and restore them to their former state and condition of favour Simler 4. And he prayeth not only for the pardoning of their temporall punishment but against everlasting death which sinne deserveth Osiander QUEST LXXVIII What booke it was out of the which Moses wisheth to be raced Vers. 32. IF thou wilt not race me out of the booke which thou hast written 1. By this booke R. Salomon understandeth the booke of the Law as Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law hee desireth if the Lord were purposed to destroy the people that his name should not be mentioned in the Law nor he taken to be the Law-giver for to what purpose should he be spoken of as a Law-giver unto that people which was not Contra. But this is not the meaning 1. Because the bookes of the Law were not yet written Moses therefore would not desire to be raced out of a booke which was not 2. Neither would Moses aske that of God which was in his owne power to doe now Moses did write the booke of the Law and he might have left out his owne name if he would 3. Againe Moses setteth against this great benefit the safety of the people the greatest losse which he could have but this had beene no such great losse unto Moses not to have his name remembred in any such written booke 4. Moses here useth a disjunctive speech Doâ— this or else race mee c. but if he meant the racing of his name out of the booke of the Law there had beene no disjunction at all for one had followed upon the other for if Israel had beene destroyed neither should Moses have written the booke of the Law which was only given unto Israel for it had beene in vaine to give Lawes unto a people that were not 5. Moses also speaketh of a booke which God had written now Moses writ the booke of the Law the ten Commandements only were written with Gods hand Tostat. quaest 41. 2. R. Abraham Francus who writeth upon Aben Ezra understandeth the racing out of this booke of the death of the body and he addeth further that there is quaedam rota coelestâ—â— a certaine celestiall wheele wherein are many starres which worke by their influence upon those iâ—â—eriour bodies and by the moving of this wheele death or life is caused so that thus he would interpret Moses speech Cause me by the motion of this wheele to dye But seeing the motion of this wheele which he imagineth is the naturall cause as he supposeth of life and death Moses could not dye naturally before his time came and if now he should have died it had beene not a naturall death but supernaturally caused by God therefore not by the motion of any such wheele Tostat. ibid. 3. Hierom also differeth not much from this former opinion in substance understanding Moses desire of death in this life he wisheth Perire in praesentiam non in perpetnum To perish for the present not for ever But whereas the Lord afterward answereth Moses Whosoever hath sinned will I put out of my booke vers 33. it followeth that they which sinne not that is without repentance are not put out of that booke but all as well the righteous as unrighteous the just and the sinners are subject to this temporall death therefore Moses speaketh not of that 4. Hierom hath beside another opinion for upon that place Psalm 69.28 Let them bee put out of the booke of life neither let them bee written with the righteous he inferreth that God hath two bookes viventium justorum of the living and of the righteous that was the booke of the living In quo ante adventum Dei Prophetae Patriarchae scripti sunt Wherein the Prophets and Patriarkes were written before the comming of God in the flesh the other wherein the faithfull are written whereof our blessed Saviour speaketh Rejoyce because your names are written in the booke of life and of the first Moses saith he speaketh in this place So some doe understand this booke in the same sense with Hierom of the booke of Gods Covenant which hee made with Israel out of the which the Gentiles were excluded of which mention is made Ezech. 13.9 where the Lord saith that the false Prophets shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel So Moses desireth here not to be counted of the family of Israel wherein all the Prophets and Patriarkes were written But if Israel had now perished the booke of Gods Covenant with Israel likewise should have beene no more remembred therefore it had beene superfluous for Moses to desire to be raced out of that booke And againe the booke of the living mentioned in the Psalme is the same with the booke of life spoken of Apocal. 3.5 I will not put his name out of the booke of life In which booke of life not only the Prophets and Patriarkes before Christ but all the faithfull before and since are written 5. Cajetane understandeth it De libro principatuâ— in hoc mundo Of the booke of principality and preeminence in the world for it is decreed with God as in a booke Quod isto vel illi principentur in hac vita That such or such shall beare rule in this life And so Moses desireth to lose his principality and government which the Lord promised him that hee would make of him a great nation c. But whereas they which sinned only are taken out of this booke of life and yet many wicked and evill men are governours in the world it cannot be meant of any such booke or decree of principalitie or government 6. Oleaster by this booke thinketh to be understood the booke of the acts and doings of the righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 But there are many righteous men whose names and acts were not written in that booke which is now thought also to be lost therefore it had beene no great matter for Moses to wish to be put out of that booke 7. Burgensis maketh foure bookes of God 1. One is the booke of life wherein only are written the names of the Elect that are ordained unto life as when souldiers are written in the muster booke which are pressed
volunt supplicium infligore c. The enemies which intend to punish doe not onely say nothing of it but go about it most secretly lest they which are to be punished for it knowing of it should escape but the Lord contrariwise praedicit differt territ when hee intendeth to punish doth give warning of it defferreth it terrifieth c. ut quae minatur non inferat that what he threatneth be not brought upon them and so the Lord doth heere he threatneth to move them to repentance 5. But these words are rather spoken enuntiativè declarative by way of declaration as Cajetane Declaratio est ejus quod dixerat It is a declaration of that which hee had said before vers 3. Lest I consume thee in the way And the meaning is this si tecum ascenderem contingere posset c. if I should go up with thee it might come to passe that I should destroy thee Osiander So also Iunius It is therefore a declaration or repetition of the former reason why the Lord would not go up with them lest being provoked by their sinnes hee might consume them 6. And the Lord to this end so often telleth them that he will not go with them that they might more earnestly sue unto God for his comfortable presence still for the Lord purposed not to withdraw his presence from them as afterward he saith unto Moses My presence shall go with thee Like unto this Cyrillus maketh that answer of our Saviour in the Gospell who being asked of his brethren if hee would go up to the feast said first hee would not go up and yet afterward went up Propter incredulitatem Iudaorum iturum se negavit tamen propter pancos sanctos ascendit c. He denied to go up because of the unbeliefe of the Jewes but he went up for their sakes which beleeved c. So here though the Lord refused in respect of the idolatrous and rebellious people to go up with them yet for Moses sake he granteth his presence QUEST IX Whether the people put off their ornaments twice Vers. 5. NOw put thy costly rayment from thee 1. Lyranus thinketh that this was another putting off than that before spoken of that the people first of themselves put off their costly rayment and then when the Lord commanded them they also put off their golden crownes But 1. It is a meere imagination that they had any such crownes 2. If they had any such it is like when they put on their mourning apparell that they would also have laid by their coronets which were not seemely for mourners to weare Tostatus qu. 7. 2. Cajetane thinketh that first ornatum personalem spontanei deposuerunt they did lay downe of their owne accord their personall ornaments but afterward they are commanded to take away also the ornament of the place Locus superior mons Dei ornatus erat à filijs Israel The higher place which was the mountaine of God the Israelites had decked and adorned because the Law there was given which the Lord commandeth to be taken away because of the sinne of the people there committed But seeing they were straitly charged not to come neere the hill upon paine of death chap. 19.13 it is not like they did decke and adorne the hill and they are bid to put their ornaments from them not from the place 3. Osiander thus interpreteth Depone totum ornamentum tuum Lay aside all thy ornaments and put on sackcloath He thinketh they had put off some before and now are bid to put off the rest but the same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gnathah used in both places sheweth that the text speaketh of the same ornaments 4. The Interlinearie glosse by their ornaments here understandeth manifestam Dei praesentiam the manifest presence and apparition of God But it was not in the peoples power to lay aside that ornament 5. Some understand by this ornament faith qua populum illum carnisse liquet which it is evident that people wanted Ex Lippom. But God would not bid them lay aside any such ornament 6. Lippoman expoundeth it thus Videri potest hoc quadam praecedentis depositionis approbatio This may seeme to bee a certaine approbation of their former laying aside of their garments But it is a commandement that they should doe it therefore not an approbation of a thing done 7. Tostatus thinketh that this laying aside of their garments was done all at once but hee saith that it was not now done but after Moses second returne from the mountaine which opinion is confuted before qu. 7. 8. Therefore Gallasius better resolveth in reading here in the preterpluperfect tense for the Lord had said So also Iun. Genevens And thinketh this to be given as a reason why the people put off their ornaments quia jussu Dei factum because it was done at the Lords commandement Neque enim illi excogitarunt hoc opus poenitentia For the people did not devise this worke of repentance of themselves Simler So also Calvine saith it is an explication of the former Non fuisse ornatos quia id vetuerat Deus That the people had not their ornaments because God forbad them The same also is the opinion of Oleaster that God spake these words before when he said I will not go up with thee vers 3. QUEST X. In what sense the Lord saith That I may know Vers. 5. THat I may know what to doe unto thee 1. The Interlinear Gloss. giveth this sense Vt sciam id est scire faciam c. That I may know that is make thee know what a great wickednesse thou hast committed whereby thou art deprived of my presence Nam ab illo die non ita manifeste apparuit illi populo For from that day he did not so manifestly appeare unto that people c. But beside that the Lord still went before them after this by his visible presence he speaketh here not as having determined what to doe but as yet one deliberating with himselfe 2. Rupertus thus interpreteth That I may know c. Nullam enim habet materiam struendae misericordia c. Because the Lord should have no matter for his mercie to worke upon if there did not go before some shew of repentance c. But the Lord in this speech determineth nothing he keepeth them in suspense 3. Tostatus turneth it the other way that seeing the objection and humiliation Sciam quid debeam poenae tibi infligere c. I may know what part of the punishment I should inflict qu. 7. But as it is said before suspensos relinquere videtur hee seemeth yet to leave them in suspense 4. Lyranus therefore resolveth upon this sense Non quod Deus aliquid de novo cognoscat Not that God should know any thing more than he did but that by the change of the people it might be made manifest what it was fit for the Lord to doe unto that people So also Ferus
to goe any further he therefore taketh them to bee deceived who thinke diversum aliquid hic notari that some divers thing is here noted than before for in the same sense the Lord is said to goe before them and to goe with them in the middest of them But in that the Lord saith againe vers 17. I will doe this thing also which thou hast said it is evident that Moses added somewhat to his former request and begged somewhat which was not yet granted though Calvin thinketh it is but the repetition of the same thing tollenda dubitationis causa to take from Moses all doubting So also Oleaster 2. Some doe thinke that Moses here asketh a divers thing from that which the Lord granted where there are divers opinions 1. Lyranus taketh it that whereas God promised to goe before Moses he further entreateth that hee would totum populum praecedere goe before not him only but all the people c. But the Lords promise was generall that his presence should goe before not expressing whom and Moses request which the Lord yeeldeth unto wherein hee maketh mention of the people vers 13. sheweth that the Lord so meant that hee would be a guide to all the people 2. Cajetan saith because the Lord had promised only in generall My face shall goe not expressing whether antâ— eos cum eis post eos before them with them or behinde them now he entreateth that hee would goe with him But Moses repeating Gods words doth put to no such limitation only hee saith If thy presence goe not carrie us not hence by which repeating of Gods words Moses knew well enough that God promised to goe before them 3. Rupertus therefore and Tostatus follow this sense that because the Lord by his presence might understand some Angell he presseth God yet further that he would goe himselfe with them But this answer is granted upon the oversight of the Latine translation which readeth here If thou wilt not goe before whereas in the originall it is being well translated If thy presence goe not So that Moses by Gods presence understandeth God himselfe as hee expoundeth vers 16. shall it not bee when thou goest with us 4. Wherefore in this reply Moses partly confirmeth the Lords answer by shewing the inconvenience that would follow that it were better for them to remaine there still than without Gods presence to goe on and offer themselves to infinite danger partly hee intreateth that God would not onely goe before them as he did before others of the Heathen whom he used in his service as he raised and stirred up Cyrus whom he conducted as the Lord saith by his Prophet Thus saith the Lord to Cyrus his anointed whose right hand I have holden to subdue nations before him c. I will goe before thee and make the crooked strait c. But that the Lord would also dwell among them in his Tabernacle as he purposed And therefore the Lord herein condescending to Moses saith afterward vers 17. I will doe this also which thou hast said that is Non solum praibo sed vobiscum ero I will not only go before you but with you also Gallas So Moses also in saying that the people may have preheminence entreateth ut non cesset Deus facere signa coram gentibus that the Lord would not cease still to doe signes and wonders for his people before the nations that they may know that God is among them Ferus Simlerus Osiander For the faithfull are not satisfied nisi Deum totum habeant unlesse they have God wholly and all Ferus QUEST XXXII Why Moses addeth Carrie us not hence seeing even in that place also they had need of Gods protection Vers. 15. CArrie us not hence 1. Calvin so understandeth Moses here as though hee should meane that it were better perire in deserto to perish in the desart than to goe forward without Gods presence But Moses by no meanes would have wished the perishing of the people for whose preservation he intreated so earnestly before wishing himselfe rather to be raced out of Gods booke than them to perish 2. Rupertus draweth it to a mysticall sense Carrie us not hence c. Quid attinet nos vivere c. To what end should we live and beget children unlesse thou come which onely canst regenerate unto life those which are borne to death c. He applyeth it to the comming of the Messiah but the phrase here used Carrie us not hence sheweth that Moses here speaketh of going into the land of Canaan for otherwise the Messiah might have beene given unto them as well in this place as in Canaan 3. His meaning therefore is melius esse iter non ingredi that it were better for them not to goe thence at all unlesse God would be their guide Simler not to stirre one foot from thence 4. Which Moses speaketh not as though they needed not Gods protection and preservation there but because they were subject to many more dangers in walking forward still for they were to passe by the countries of divers nations who would suspect them as having a purpose to invade their land whereas now remaining still they should not be molested of any Tostat. qu. 16. QUEST XXXIII Why it is added People upon the earth Vers. 16. ALL the people that are upon the earth 1. This is not added by way of distinction as though there were any people under the earth they which are gone out of the world are called people as Abraham is said to be gathered unto his people but not properly because they are spirits and not men in hell there can be no people because there is no order nor communitie as where a people is there is a mutuall communitie and they are governed by Law nor yet in heaven is there said to bee a people properly their bodies being laid aside their spirits only there living in bliffe 2. Neither are those which are called Antipodes which dwell on the other side of the earth under but upon the earth as we are 3. Sed positum est ex superabundantia This is added of abundance for more plaine evidence and demonstration Tostat. qu. 16. QUEST XXXIV Whether Moses desired to see the verie divine nature and essence of God Vers. 18. I Beseech thee shew me thy glorie 1. Ferus thinketh that Moses only asked of God to shew him certaine signes and evidences of his glorie quibus omnes homines te agnoscant credant whereby all men may acknowledge thee and beleeve in thee But this had beene a lawfull request and the Lord would not have denied it 2. Some thinke that Moses desired ostendi sibi aspectabilem formam divinae majestatis that there might be shewed unto him some visible forme of the divine Majestie not for his owne satisfaction but to content the rude people that he might make some description thereof unto them who desired to be instructed by some visible demonstration
facit injuriam occidendo quemcunque He doth no wrong by slaying of any Cajetan 2. Non tam lunut peccata parentum quam natura debitum They doe not so much rue the sinnes of their parents as yeeld natures debt which God may exact when and of whom and how he please Iun. annot Iosh. 7. vers 25. 3. It must be understood of temporall punishments which may be inflicted for the fathers sinnes Tostat. qu. 9. 4. But the best solution is that God sheweth mercie unto a thousand generations of them that love him and visiteth the iniquity of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of them that hate him which words although they be not inserted here are added to the second Commandement Exod. 20. 5. But Tostatus thus objecteth to this last answer 1. That the wicked children of good parents are found to be respected for their fathers as the Lord suffered the wicked Kings of Judah to sit upon the throne for their father Davids sake 2. If this should be understood of shewing mercie to the vertuous seed and vengeance to the wicked race they should be respected for their owne piety or sinne not for their fathers 3. If the children are punished which are found in their owne sinnes how can the third or fourth generation be counted from themselves therefore they are punished for their sinnes from whom the account of the generations beginneth 4. In this sense there should be no difference betweene the continuance of mercie to a thousand generations and of punishment to the fourth generation for the wicked for their owne sinnes are not punished only to the fourth generation but to a thousand also Tostat. qu. 10. Contra. 1. It is not denied but that God may bestow temporall blessings upon the children of the righteous though they be wicked but that is not generall nor perpetuall God sometimes is so mercifull as he was to Davids posterity for some reasons best knowne to himselfe But this promise is generall and certainly holdeth not but where the children imitate the fathers piety 2. The condition of them that love me and of them that hate me is not understood of the particular but the exemplary vertues or sinnes of the children wherein they imitate their parents and so they are both their parents origine exemplo in respect of the originall and example and theirs in imitation 3. The generations are counted from him whose evill example they corruptly imitate for otherwise a mans private and particular sinnes concerne but himselfe only So the wicked posterity of the wicked are both punished unto the third and fourth generation for the exemplary sinnes of their fathers which they imitate and for their owne sinnes they are punished without any limitation 4. The same answer may serve to the fourth objection for the difference is in this that mercie is extended unto the righteous seed of the righteous in a double respect both of the examplary vertues of their fathers whom they imitate and of their owne righteousnesse and this without limitation even to a thousand generations not that there shal be so many generations in the world but to shew that Dei misericordia nunquam exhauritur Gods mercie is never drawne drie Vatabl. So the wicked race of the ungodly also is punished in a double manner for imitating their fathers sinnes which punishment extendeth not beyond the fourth generation and for their owne sinnes which every one shall be judged for in his generation and that for ever QUEST XIV How Moses and Ezechiel may be reconciled WHerefore Rupertus resolution here is very sound Non portat filius iniquitatem patris quandocunque non imitatur The sonne doth not beare the fathers iniquity when he doth not imitate his sinne and so he reconcileth Moses and the Prophet Ezechiel who saith The sonne shall not beare the iniquitie of the father chap. 18.20 And yet the Lord here saith to Moses that he will visit the iniquity of the fathers upon the children c. The Prophet speaketh of such children as decline their fathers evill wayes the Lord here of such as imitate their fathers impiety 2. Cajetane giveth another solution Hic est sermo de poena corporis ibi de poena animae Here the Lord speaketh of the punishment of the body there of the punishment of the soule But it is evident that the Prophet speaketh also of temporall punishment as that proverbe used among the Israelites must be understood Our fathers have eaten sower grapes and our teeth are set on edge they doe not meane that their soules were punished for their fathers sinnes but their bodies 3. Tostatus as is shewed before quest 13. thinketh that the Prophet speaketh only of punishment by death and so the children are not punished for their fathers sinnes only infants excepted but this place he would have understood of other temporall punishments which the children may suffer for their parents sinnes Tostat. qu. 9. Contra. But this observation doth not hold for Eli his posterity were even cut off by death for the sinne of Eliâ—s house it is told him by the Prophet that there should not bee an old man of his house 1 Sam. 2.32 which came to passe when 85. of his posterity were slaine by Saul in one day 1 Sam. 22. Therefore the former solution of Rupertus is the best See more hereof chap. 20. quest 7. and 8. upon the second Commandement QUEST XV. How a thousand generations are to be counted Vers. 7. REserving mercie for thousands 1. It must not be taken strictly and precisely for a thousand generations for so many there shall not be from the beginning of the world to the end thereof as may be thus shewed 1. From Adam to Christ were not much above 4000. yeeres Tostatus counteth them above 5000. but he is therein greatly deceived yet according to Saint Lukes computation there are but 70. generations from Christ to Adam and in Matthewes genealogie but 62. twenty from Adam to Abraham and from thence to Jesus 42. generations if in foure thousand yeeres and odde there were but 70. generations a thousand generations according to that proportion would require above forty thousand 2. Againe if a generation be taken for an hundred yeeres the longest time of a mans life the summe would amount to an hundred thousand yeeres if it be restrained to that age when a man is apt for generation which is twenty or twenty five yeeres a thousand generations will make up twenty or twenty five thousand yeeres 2. Wherefore a thousand generations are here taken indefinitely for many generations Tostatus For universa familia the whole family of the righteous Ferus Signifying that Gods mercie shall never be exhaust toward the righteous and their seed QUEST XVI The fathers merits are not extended to their children only Christs merits are extended to infinite generations BUt if God doe shew mercie unto the posterity of the righteous for their fathers sake it seemeth to be of merit for
all kinde of league and entercourse is not forbidden with nations of stranger religion there be foedera commerciorum causa leagues for traffike sake and other common necessary things which belong unto the life which kinde of league may be made with such but not foedera auxiliatoria leagues of mutuall helpe Simler Calvin See more hereof chap. 23. qu. 50. QUEST XXVI Why their images were to be broken downe Vers. 13. ANd breake their images in peeces 1. This they were commanded to doe ut non remaâ—eat memoria c. that there should no memory remaine of idolatry Lyran. For looke what was left of those superstitious monuments tantundem fomenti remaneret so much leaven remained to corrupt pure religion Gallas 2. So that it is evident that these things were not to be transferred to Gods service as though it were lawfull to worship the true God after that manner wherein they worshipped their false gods for this is added as a reason Thou shalt not bow downe to any other god therefore si Iehovam in statuis colore vis Deum alienum colis if thou wilt worship God by images thou dost worship a strange god Simler For the true God will be worshipped after that manner which he hath prescribed Marbach Here then is the errour of the Romanists that doe worship God after the superstitious rites of the Heathen 3. Beside if images must be broken downe then it is not lawfull to retaine them still though they be not professedly adored for the very occasion of offence and stumbling must be taken out of the way as Hezekiah brake downe the brasen serpent which the people had superstitiously abused this then maketh strongly against them that tolerate images in their Churches though they adore them not QUEST XXVII To what use images being pulled downe may be converted 4. THe gold and silver which came of these images it was not lawfull for them to convert to their owne private use Deut. 7.26 they are forbidden to bring any such abominable thing into their house Tostat. qu. 12. Yet to publike uses either for the service of God or for the Commonwealth they might be converted as the gold and silver and the spoile of Jericho was put to the Lords treasury Iosh. 6.19 though it were sinne in Achan to take that which he purloined to his owne private use Simler 5. It is not safe that such monuments of superstition should still be kept though the use be discontinued as it hath fallen out in some places in our times that images having beene laid aside and not defaced were set up againe when idolatrie was revived the saying is that He that will not have a Storke returne to his house must pull downe her nest Simler And here in England if those superstitious cels of Monkes had not beene pulled downe it is to be feared that those uncleane birds would have setled themselves in their nests againe The things then consecrate to idolatrie being so defaced as that they cannot returne to their former use may be converted to some other publike service QUEST XXIX To whom it belongeth to pull downe images Vers. 13. BReake their images in peeces 1. It is not sufficient then for idolatry by the preaching of the Word to be pulled out of mens hearts as some affirme but the Magistrate is commanded by his authority to remove all such stumbling blockes as the good Kings of Judah Ezechiah and Iosiah did and the good Christian Emperours Constantinus and Theodosius 2 And this belongeth not to any private man to doe but to leave it to the Magistrate to whom the Lord hath committed this authority to reforme publike abuses yet in their private families men may reforme their housholds as Iacob caused all in his house to remove from them their strange gods Gen. 35.2 3. And further as it is not lawfull for private men by their private authority to take upon them the publike reformation in abolishing reliques of superstition as it was decreed in the Eliberine Councell that if any man breaking downe an image were slaine in the very act doing he should not be counted a Martyr and Theodoret writeth of one Aâ—das a Bishop who overthrew Peâ—sarum pyraema the temple of the Persians wherein they worshipped fire which fact he commendeth not but approveth his constancie in that he chose rather to suffer punishment than to restore idolatrie yet notwithstanding they fall not under this censure who being private men instinctu Spiritus excitantur are stirred up by the instinct of Gods Spirit and moved with an heroicall spirit to doe any such publike act as Ambrose Epist. 29. defendeth a certaine Bishop which had set on fire a Synagogue of the Jewes and another which under Iulian the Emperour was put to death for pulling downe an Altar So some among us and in other places have beene moved by the like spirit to shew their detestation against idolatry publikely in defacing of images and disgracing the Masse who are not rashly to be condemned Simler QUEST XXX How the Lord is said to be a jealous God Vers. 14. WHose name is Iealous a jealous God 1. Thomas Aquin. defineth jealousie to be Intensus amor non patiens consortium in amato A fervent love not suffering any fellowship in that which is loved and it is of two sorts either in that which is good as to be jealous of Gods honour and in this sense the Apostle saith It is good to love earnestly alwayes in a good thing Gal. 4.18 and this is a good zeale or jealousie and thus the Lord is said to be jealous as a man is over the chastity of his wife that his people should not commit spirituall fornication There is a jealousie in other outward things as in the honours of this life as Saul was jealous over David for the Kingdome and this is an evill jealousie 2. Sometime one is jealous for himselfe as the husband is over his wife that shee might be chaste unto him sometime for another as a good servant is jealous in his masters absence that his wife may keepe her selfe entire unto his master as Paul was jealous over the Corinthians with a godly jealousie to keepe them as a pure virgin for Christ 2 Corin. 11.2 The Lord is jealous both these wayes in respect of himselfe quia non potest habere parem c. the Divine nature can indure no equall Cajetan And he is said to be jealous Si quosdam ex suis viderit in sere perditos If he see any of his to fall away from his worship and so be lost Cyril 3. But God is jealous not as man is jealous Non humana perturbationis vitio facit Deus God is not jealous with any perturbation of minde as man is being unchangeable in himselfe Augustin Caret affectionibus Deus c. God is without affections but he is said to be jealous because he would not have any that hath knowne him to be carried away into
Neither yet were they fastened directly in the verie corner of all where the sides joyned together for then the bars could not conveniently have beene thrust thorow them but by the corners are meant the sides neere unto the corners as it is said afterward that the barres were in the rings by the sides of the Arke Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST II. Why it is said He made where the Lord said before to Moses Thou shalt make Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat c. The phrase must be observed that whereas chap. 25. the Lord saith to Moses Thou shalt make an Arke thou shalt make a candlesticke thou shalt make a table and so of the rest here it is said He that is Bezaleel made the Arke he made the table he made the candlesticke The reason hereof is to shew the obedience of Moses and the people lest they might have beene thought to have received many precepts of the Lord and performed few of them In that therefore the Lord said to Moses Thou shalt make there the charge and commandement is given But now where it is thus rehearsed and he made the dutifull and carefull performing is expressed of that which was given them in charge Pellican QUEST III. In what forme the branches of the candlesticke went up Vers. 18. SIx branches came out of the side thereof 1. Pellican seemeth to thinke that these branches went up erectis calamis with their stalkes upright 2. But their opinion seemeth more probable who thinke that the branches in their going up semicirculos effecisse made halfe circles for both that forme and fashion was more comely to sight and beside if they had gone upright this inconvenience would have followed that the lamps above where the oyle was put for the lights would not have stood right up but leaning one way which had been unfit both for the droppings of the oyle and the lights would not have burned so cleare nor so bright if the lamps had not stood even and levell Gallas The rest of the questions concerning these instruments and ornaments of the Temple which are described in this chapter are before discussed chap. 25. and chap. 30. in the beginning of the chapters 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Christ our true propitiatorie and Mercie-seat Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat The Mercie-seat signified Christ our true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Propitiatorie who hath reconciled us to God his Father The Cherubs upon the Mercie-seat doe represent the holy Angels whose ministerie Christ useth in the government of his Church Pelargus As the Apostle saith They are sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Hebr. 1.14 Marbach 2. Doct. Christ both God and man THe making of the Arke of wood within and gold without did set forth the two natures in our blessed Saviour joyned together in one person the divine and humane Simlerus In the Propitiatorie and Mercie-seat are typically set forth the benefits that we have by Christ that as the Propitiatorie covered the Arke wherein was the Law so Christ Legem nos accusantem tegit doth cover and hide the Law which accuseth us Simler But more particularly the Apostle rehearseth the benefits which we have by Christ saying that he is made of God unto us his wisdome righteousnesse sanctification redemption 1. His wisdome in that Christ hath revealed unto us the will of his Father to give his Sonne for us That whosoever beleeveth in him should have eternall life 2. He is our Iustice in that hee imparted to us both his active righteousnesse in fulfilling the Law and his passive obedience in bearing the punishment due unto our sinne so the Apostle saith Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to everie one that beleeveth 3. Christ is our Sanctification in that hee doth not only impute unto us his righteousnesse by faith but doth also sanctifie and regenerate us by his Spirit inabling us in some measure to keepe his Commandements as the Lord saith by his Prophet I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes 4. He is our Redemption in that he hath by his innocent death appeased the wrath of God toward us as the Apostle saith Who shall condemne us it is Christ which is dead c. Marbachius 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against such hereticks as erred concerning Christs divine or humane nature AS Christ is shadowed forth in the Arke to be both God and man so all such are condemned which doe erre concerning the divine or humane nature of Christ. As touching Christs divine nature 1. Some utterly deny it making Christ a meere man and not to have beene before he was conceived of the Virgin Marie in which heresie were Cerinthus Ebion contrarie to the Scripture which saith that the Word which was made flesh was in the beginning c. Ioh. 1.1 2. Some confesse another nature in Christ beside his humanitie but not of the same substance with God yet of an higher nature than any creature so held Carpocrates Basilides Arrius but our blessed Saviour himselfe saith I and my Father are one Ioh. 20.30 3. Some affirmed that Christ beside his humane nature consisted also of a divine yet not begotten of the Father but making one person with God the Father as well as being of one substance so the Sabellians and Patropassians whereas the Apostle saith God sent his Sonne made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The person then of the Sonne and not of the Father was made man for us Concerning Christs humane nature 1. Some affirmed that he was not a true man but onely in outward appearance as the Manichees and Marcionites who are confuted by Christs owne words Luke 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me have 2. The Valentinians and Anabaptists hold that Christ had not his flesh of the Virgin Marie but brought it with him from heaven contrarie to the Apostle who saith That hee was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. c. 3. 3. Some taught that Christ had a true humane nature but in respect of his body onely not of his soule as Apollinaris Bishop of Laodicea who is convinced by the words of our Saviour Matth. 26. My soule is heavie unto death 4. Some grant that Christ tooke upon him our whole nature but not our humane infirmities But the Apostle teacheth the contrarie that Christ was in all things tempted in like sort as we are yet without sinne There are two kinde of infirmities some are personall as leprosie blindnesse sicknesse diseases these Christ was not subject unto there are naturall infirmities which doe belong unto the whole humane nature as wearinesse hunger griefe and such like these our blessed Saviour undertooke that he might be in all things like unto us 5. Some hold that Christ had a true humane nature but after the uniting thereof in one person to his
of coveting 5. qu. Whether sinne properly consist in the internall or externall act 6. qu. The law of Moses did not onely restraine the hand but the minde 7. qu. Whether any morall and naturall duties were to be restrained by positive law 8. qu. Of the perfection and sufficiencie of the Morall law 9. qu. Of the abrogation of the law Questions upon the rest of this twentieth Chapter 1. QUest In what sense the people are said to have seene the voices which are properly heard and not seene 2. qu. What is meant here by voices whether the thunder or other voices 3. qu. VVhether there were a sound of the trumpet beside the voices 4. qu. Of the feare of the people and their going backe 5. qu. VVhy they desire that Moses would speake unto them 6. qu. VVhy the people are afraid they shall die 7. qu. How the Lord is said to come unto them and why 8. qu. How the Lord is said to tempt and prove his people 9. qu. VVhy the people stood afarre off and where 10. qu. How Moses is said to draw neere to the darknesse 11. qu. VVhy the Lord saith he spake unto them from heaven 12. qu. Why this precept is repeated of not making any graven image 13. qu. Of the meaning of these words Yee shall not make with me 14. qu. VVhy mention is made onely of images of silver and gold 15. qu. VVhy the Lord commanded an Altar of earth to be made 16. qu. VVhy the Altar was not to be made of hewen stone 17. qu. VVhy the lifting up of the toole is said to pollute the Altar 18. qu. How Jeremie is made to agree with Moses who saith the Lord commanded not any thing concerning sacrifices 19. qu. Of the difference betweene burnt offerings and peace offerings 20. qu. Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice in no other place than before the Arke or Tabernacle 21. qu. Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice before the Arke at the Tabernacle while they were asunder 22. qu. How long the Arke was severed from the Tabernacle 23. qu. Of the removing of the Tabernacle 24. qu. Of the places where it was lawfull or unlawfull to sacrifice 25. qu. How God is said to come and goe and how he is said to be in the world 26. qu. Whether it were not lawfull to goe up by steps to the Altar 27. qu. Why they were forbidden to use steps up to the Altar 28. qu. Of the abominable Idoll of the Gentiles called Priapus and the filthie usages thereto belonging 29. qu. Why the secret parts are counted uncomely Questions upon the one and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Of the necessitie of the Iudiciall lawes 2. qu. The difference of the Morall Iudiciall and Ceremoniall lawes 3. qu. How the Ceremonials are abolished 4. qu. How far the Iudicials are now to be retained 5. qu. Why these lawes are called Iudgements 6. qu. How Moses propounded these lawes by speaking or by writing 7. qu. Why the Israelites were called Hebrewes 8. qu. How the Hebrewes became servants 9. qu. The difference betweene Hebrew servants and strangers 10. qu. Of three kinds of libertie and how servitude is agreeable to the law of nature 11. qu. How these six yeares are to be accounted 12. qu. The reasons why they ought to set their servants free 13. qu. Why the space of six yeares is limited for their service 14. qu. How the servant is said to come in with his bodie 15. qu. What manner of wise the master was to give to his servant 16. qu. Whether such separation betweene the servant and his wife were lawfull 17. qu. Why the servant was brought before the Iudges and what doore he was set to 18. qu. Of the divers kinds of punishments used among the Israelites 19. qu. What is meant here by Ever 20. qu. When the servant was to goe out free in the seventh yeare when in the fiftieth yeare 21. qu. Certaine cases put when the yeare of Iubile came before the yeare of remission 22. qu. Whether it were lawfull among the Israelites for the parents to sell their children 23. qu. In what sense it is said She shall not goe out as other servants 24. qu. Whether it must be read betrothed or betrothed not 25. qu. How shee was to be redeemed 26. qu. Why it was not lawfull to sell their maids to strangers 27. qu. What the meaning is of these words He hath despised her 28. qu. What kinde of betrothing is here understood 29. qu. Whether it were lawfull to take another wife to the former 30. q. Of the true reading and meaning of the 10. vers 31. qu. What these three things are mentioned in the text 32. qu. Whether maid servants were set free in the seventh yeare and not sometime before sometime after 33. qu. The summarie sense of this law concerning maid servants 34. qu. Of the end scope and intent of this law 35. qu. What kinde of smiting is here meant 36. qu. Why the murtherer was to die the death 37. qu. In what sense the Lord is said to offer a man into ones hand 38. qu. What places of refuge were appointed 39. qu. Why the Lord appointed places for such to flie unto 40. qu. What is to be counted wilfull murder 41. qu. Of the difference betweene voluntarie and involuntarie murder and the divers kinds of each 42. qu. Why the wilfull murderer was to be taken from the Altar 43. qu. What manner of smiting of parents is forbidden 44. qu. Of the grievous sin of paricide 45. qu. The law of manstealing expounded 46. qu. The reason why manstealing was punished by death 47. qu. What kinde of cursing of parents is here understood 48. qu. What manner of strife the law meaneth 49. qu. What punishment the smiter had if he which were smitten died 50. qu. VVhat should become of the smiter if the other died after he walked upon his staffe 51. qu. Of the equity of this law in bearing of the charges 52. qu. VVho should beare the charges if a servant had done the hurt 53. qu. VVhat servants this law meaneth and what kinde of chastisement is forbidden 54. q. The meaning of this clause For he is his money 55. qu. VVhether this law meane the voluntarie or involuntarie hurt done to a woman with child 56. qu. VVhether the death of the infant be punished as well as of the mother 57. qu. VVhether this law extendeth it selfe to infants which miscarie being not yet perfectly formed 58. qu. VVhy the action is given unto the husband 59. qu. VVhether the law of retalion be literally to be understood 60. qu. VVhether the law of retalion were just and equall 61. qu. Of servants freedome for the losse of an eye or tooth 62. qu. VVhat manner of smiting and goaring of a beast is here understood 63. qu. VVhy the ox that goareth was commanded to be stoned to death 64. qu. VVhy the flesh of the ox was not to be eaten 65. qu. In what case
simple theft which is onely upon extreame necessitie and committed in â—â—mplicitie In the first sense simple theft may be punished by death not in the â—â—cond Neither in that place pag. 5. is any exception take to the lawes of the Realme as too rigorous against simple theft but it is mainâ—â—ined that the lawes of the land intend not the punishment of death for such imple theft as is more at large shewed pag. 412. quest 3. chap. 22. but alloweth â—he favour of the booke Onely a request is made to Reverend Iudges that â—o great exactnesse bee not required in reading of such simple Clearks Bâ— it will be objected that such as steale for necessity being once acquitted anâ— burnt in the hand if they be deprehended in the like againe do die for it aâ—d therefore the law of the land punisheth simple theft with death The answeâ— is thaâ— now it is not simple theft being joyned with obstinacie and custome 〈◊〉 sinne Againe it will be objected that women â—tealing for necessitie being not admitted to the privilege of their booke though they steale onely for necessitie doe suffer death for such theft It may be â—nswered that in women such kinde of theft argueth great boldnesse and impuâ—encie to whom their naturall shamefastnesse and impotencie ought to be a brâ—lle more â—â—an unto men and therefore in them it is a greater fault and yet if â—he like favour were extended to them as to men in the like cases no great inconvenience neeâ— to be feared Thus much in this place I thought good to advertise the Reader oâ— lest there might be any mistaking This laborious and painfull worke was finisheâ— by the Lords gracâ—ous assistance the fifth of Iune Anno Domini 1608. aetatis Authoris 46. Pâ—â—ysed be God our â—eavenly Father with the holy Spirit through Christ Iesus our most blessed Lord and Saviour forever Amen FINIS Deut. 4. v. 18. Synopsis papismi ad Regiam Majestatem and the Antilogie or counterplea Ecclesia triumphans ad sereniss Reginam Antithesis doctrinae Evangelicae Pontificiae ad Henricum Principem Epist 3. nescio quomodo quotiescun que legitur quasi nunc fiar ita afficit mentes audientium serm 77. Cor. 4.16 Noah signifieth rest Abram an high father Isaack laughter Iacob â—a supplanter Ioseph added Hosh. 10.3.8 Ezech. 28 1â— 2 Sam. 19.25 1 Sam. 19.31 〈◊〉 43. Cum haberet supra omnes potestatem quasi parens expostulare malebat quam quasi judex punire vincere volebat non plectere aequitatis judex non poenae arbiter maluit sibi homines religione quam timore astringere de obit Theodos. Prefat ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 21. 2 Sam. 20.25 Phil. 1.18 Act. 15.39 Theodoret. lib. 5.6.7 Ambr. in obit Valentinian 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 99. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p 34. Ierem. 38.9 Theodor. l. 4. cap 32. Pro â—e praesente senatus hominumqâ—â— praeterea viginti â—ilia vestem mutâ—verunt orat post redit 1 Sam. 2 3â— 2 King 2◠◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 43 Ego tibi mercedem dabo si me tanto labore liberaveris Socrat. lib 6. cap. 20. quâ—mad modum parentes a filiis vel pueris vel aegrotis multa patiuntur donec pueritia vel aegritudo transeat de serm in monte 34. Psal. 45 4. Socrat. lib. 7.23 Matth. 25 2â— 2. Peter â— 13.â—â— quis mihi jure succenseat si quantum caeteris ad res suas obeundas quantum ad festos dies Iudorum celebrandos quantum ad alias voluptates conceditur temporis quantum alij tribuunt in tempestivis conviviis quantum denique aleae quantum pilae tantum egomet mihi ad haec studia recolenda sumpsero Tull. orat pro Archi. poeta 1. Cor. 4. â—â— 2 Cor. 10. â—â— Eph. 6.19 Psal. 12â— Hieronym Sophronio Hieron ad Rustiâ— Epist. 7. Augustin ibid Tit. 1.8 Epist. 57. In Cantic â—3 ser. Philip. 3.15 Philip. 1.18 Mar. 9.40 Rom. 14.17 18. Epist. 15. Tom. 9. de utiliâ—ate jeâ—unii Cyril ad Geâ—â—adium Cyprian lib. 3. Epist. 2. Hom. 43. ad cap. Matth. 23. 1 Cor. 4. Epist. 11â— Lib. 83. quest Quest. 71. Hâ—â—ron Pammach S.c. S.c. S.c. T.r. T.r. S.c. G.r. S. ad S.H. Whether were firsâ— created thâ— heaven or the earth How God called the light day Whether the firmament be the starry heaven Mountaines before the flood The earth not dryed by the winde The opposite part of the earth not drowned The water and earth make buâ— one Globe The earth deeper than the water The measure of the compasse of the earth Pererius Whither the waters were conveâ—ed that covered the earth Terra humilia potuit defâ—â—derâ—â— How the sea is kept in that it overfloweth not the earth Whether the red sea be higher than Egypt The earth higher than the sea Whether the whole sea be a continued water Why the approbatioÌ„ God saw it was good is omitted the second day Hebrewes curious observations Dionâ—â— Halicaâ— Rom. Antiq. li. â— What Moneth the first in the yeare Lib. 1. Hexem c. 4. First moneth in the yeare Exod. 12.2 Epist de celebr Paschal Hebrewes 〈◊〉 Why the Moone is called a great light The distaÌ„ce of the Sunne and Moone from the earth Ambrose reasons of the greatnes of the Sunne and Moone The lawfull vse of the celestiall bodies The vanity of judiciall Astrology Astrologicall predictions false and vncertaine Oracles of Apollo deceitfull How men may prognosticate of the weather The blasphemous assertions of some Astrologers How it commeth to passe that astrological predictions sometimes come to passe Hebrewes â—ables Ex Peretio Monstrous births of women begotten of beasts God appeared in no humane shape when he made man Divers opinions of the image of God in man Augustines divers conceits hereof The image of God consisteth not in the natural substance of the faculties oâ— the soule but in the gifts of grace Adam lost the image of God by his fall Origen unjustly condemned by Epiphanius How man exerciseth his dominion over creatures If man had not sinned no beasts should have been killed for food Beasts should not have beene killed for knowledge or pleasure before mans fall Their reasons answered that thinke no flesh to have beene eaten before the floud What food the cattell lived of in the Arke Divers reasons proving the use of beasts for food before the floud See more of this matter C. 9. q. â— To whom God said let us make man The lying computation of yeeres of the Egyptians The Papists confuted that â—estâ—aine marriage 1. The great wisdome of God in the creation 2. The great bounty of God 3. Gods image must be repaired 4. Mans obedience toward his Creator 5. God illuminateth the soule 6. To delight in good things S.H. S. c. S. c. differ vet S. H. ad S. H. s. b. div accep Ch.c. h.c. appâ—spr s.c. h.s.c. s. c. S.h.c. S.h.c. s. ad h. c. differ veâ— diff veâ— h. C.c. app pro. prop. S. plur 〈◊〉 singul s.c. S.h. sense
not evill that Adam in abstaining from that which was good might shew his humility to his Creator 2. In that God gave Adam so easie a precept to keep only to refraine to eat of one tree having liberty to use all the rest beside not like in hardnesse and difficulty to the commandement given to Abraham to sacrifice his only sonne herein the transgression and disobedience of Adam appeared to be the greater in transgressing a precept so easie to have beene obeyed This Augustine lib. 14. de civit dei c. 15. Thirdly we answer with Tertullian that this precept though in shew but easie and light yet containeth the very foundation of all precepts and of the whole morall law for therein was contained both his duty toward God in obeying his will and love toward themselves in escaping death which was threatned if they transgressed Tertul. lib. con Iud. So that in this precept Adam might have shewed both his love toward God in his obedience faith in beleeving it should so fall out unto him if he disobeyed as God said hope in expecting a further reward if he had kept the commandement The Hebrewes here are somewhat curious as R. Isaach that if they had tasted only of the fruit and not eaten it they had not transgressed but the commandements of God doe concerne the very thought R. Levi by eating understandeth the apprehension of things spirituall which is here forbidden but we take it rather litterally and historically that God giveth them so easie a precept to try their love and obedience Mercer QVEST. XXVI How a Law is not given to a righteous man BUt the Apostle saith The law is not given to a righteous man but unto the disobedient c. 1 Tim. 1.9 And Adam was now just and righteous and therefore he needed not a law for answer whereunto I say that the law in two respects is said not to be given to a just man 1. in respect of the negative precepts as to abstaine from murther theft adultery but in regard of the affirmative precepts to retaine them in obedience and doing of good workes so the just man had need of a law and so had Adam 2. A just man need not to feare the punishment of the law as S. Paul in another place saith of the Magistrate which is the speaking or living law he is not to be feared for good workes but for evill Rom. 13.4 And in this respect so long as Adam remained in his integrity and justice the punishment in the law concerned him not 3. And a righteous man rather of a voluntary disposition than by compulsion of law yeeldeth his obedience QVEST. XXVII Why God gave a precept to Adam fore-seeing before that he would transgresse it FOurthly A question will here bee moved why the Lord gave this precept to Adam which hee knew hee would not keepe for answer whereunto first wee say that God gave him a precept which was possible to be kept and Adam had power to keep it if he would it was then not Gods fault that gave him free will but his owne that abused that gift Secondly if it be replyed why God did not give him grace and stay him from transgression I answer that God could have given him such grace and to the Angels likewise that they should not have fallen but it was fit that God should leave the creatures to their free will and not hinder the course of nature which hee had made Thirdly though God foresaw mans transgression yet that was no reason to withhold the precept for then God should neither have made the Angels nor man because he saw that some of both should bee reprobates and by the same reason God should not have given his written word because many heretikes doe pervert it to their destruction Fourthly as God foresaw mans transgression so he knew how to turne it to good as in shewing mercy to sinners and in sending Christ to restore what man had lost so that notwithstanding Gods foresight of Adams transgression he was not to forbeare to charge Adam with this commandement in regard of the great good which God also did foresee should ensue QVEST. XXVIII What kind of death was threatned to Adam Vers. 17. IN the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death The first question here moved is what death God threatneth to Adam whether the death only of the body or soule or of both 1. We neither think that the spirituall death of the soule is here only signified whereby the soule is separated by sinne from God which was the opinion of Philo Iudeus lib. 2. de allegor Mosaicis and of Eucherim lib. 1. in Genes for wee see that the Lord himselfe threatned the death of the body to Adam Genes 2.19 Dust thou art and to dust thou shalt returne 2. Neither is the death of the body here onely implyâ—d as some have thought but the death of the soule by sinne also which bringeth forth the death of the body as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 5.13 Death went over all men for as much as all men have sinned There was first sinne in the soule before there followed death in the body 3. Neither doe we think that everlasting death is here excluded as Pererius seemeth to insinuate lib. 4. in Genes qu. 4. of this matter For the Apostle saith We were by nature the children of death as well as others Eph. 1.5 by Adams transgression we were the children of wrath hee therefore much more that made us so and if Adam had not by sinning made himselfe guilty of eternall death why was the promise of the Messiah presently upon his fall made unto him Gen. 1.15 whose office is to redeeme us from sinne and everlasting damnation 4. Wee therefore thinke with Augustine that by death here is understood whatsoever death either of the soule or body temporall or eternall lib. 1. de câ—vâ—â— dei c. 12. for Augustine maketh foure kinds of death the temporall death of the soule when it is for a time separated from God by sin the eternal death of the soule when it is separated from the body the temporall death of the body when it is separated from the soule the eternall death of the body in hell So Adam first died in soule by losing his innocency he died in body returning to dust he was subject also to everlasting death both of body and soule but from that he was redeemed by Christ. 5. Beside under the name of death are comprehended all other miseries calamities and sorrowes which are the forerunners of death so that we may fitly compare death to the center all other miseries as the circle or circumference about the center or as the Scripture resembleth it death is as the burning coale other sorrowes and miseries are as the sparkles that doe rise from the coale Iob 5.7 Man is borne to travaile as the sparkes flye upward QVEST. XXIX When Adam began to die SEcondly it is
inquired when this sentence began to take place that in what day soever Adam did eat of the tree he should dye the death 1. Some thinke that a day is not here to bee taken according to mans account of dayes but as it is before God with whom a thousand yeares are but as a day and so Adam died within a thousand yeares after so Iustinus dialog cum Triph. but this sense seemeth to bee strained 2. Neither doe we refer these words in what day soever to the first clause only thou shalt eat and not to the second thou shalt dye the death as though the meaning should not bee they should dye the same day wherein they did eat but at any time after for this seemeth also to be but a forced sense 3. But we rather allow Hieromes interpretation that Adam began in the same day to dye not actually but because then he became mortall and subject to death lib. tradit in Gen. so Symmachus readeth thou shalt bee mortall 4. And beside that then actualâ—y Adam entred into misery and sorrow labour hunger thirst which are the forerunners of death 5. Adde unto this also that in the same day death entred by sinne into the soule of Adam in the very same day of his transgression QVEST. XXX Whether God made death THirdly seeing that by Gods sentence death seased upon Adam the question is whether God made death and whether this corporall death be a punishment of sin We answer 1. that as death is a defect of nature beside the first intention of the Creator brought in by sinne into the world that God is not the â—uthor of it but it is so only the fruit and effect of sinne 2. But as death is a just punishment inflicted for sinne so it is of God who though hee first made not death yet now hee disposeth of it thereby shewing his justice upon mans transgression so that as Augustine saith speaking of the beginning of darkenesse Deus non fâ—â—â—t tenebras sâ—dâ—rdinavit God made not darknesse but ordered them so may it bee said of death 3. Eugubiâ—us objecteth that death is not properly a punishment of sinne because it remaineth in the faithfull and it is not taken away by Christ. in Cosmopeia To which we answer 1. That death also at the last shal be destroyed by Christ 1 Cor. 15.26 The last enemy that shal be destroied is death 2. That although the death of the body remaine yet in the members of Christ in them it is not now as a punishment but as a consequent of their corruptible nature because all flesh is now as grasse Isa. 40.6 and death now unto them is not a curse but turned to a blessing in Christ being both a cessation from labâ—ur and an entrance into rest Rev. 14.13 Blessed are they that dye in the Lord they rest from their labours and their workes follow them QVEST. XXXI Why it was not good for man to be alone Vers. 18. IT is not good for man to be alone 1. not as R. Sâ—l left if man would have beene alone hee might be thought to be chiefe Lord in earth as God was in heaven for if man had beene alone who should have so thought or spoken 2. Neither was it not good in respect of God who by his infinite power and wisdome could otherwayes have multiplyed and increased man but in respect of that order and course of generation which God appointed for other creatures 3. Neither is this so said as though no man could live without a woman as the Hebrewes have these sayings nothing is good but a woman â—e that hath not a wife is not a man for God hath given unto some a speciall gift which may supply this want 4. Neither is S. Paul contrary to Moses where he saith it is not good to touch a woman for he speaketh in respect of those present times of persecution wherein their wives might have beene a let unto them Mercer 5. But this is so said 1. in respect of mutuall society and comfort 2. in respect of the propagation of the world 3. especially for the generation and increase of the Church of God 4. but most of all it was meet that woman should bee joyned to man because of the promised seed of the woman of whom came our Saviour Christ after the flesh QVEST. XXXII Wherein woman was a meet helpe for him Vers. 18. LEt us make an helpe meet for him The word cenâ—gdâ— signifieth as one before him or against him But we neither allow the conceit of some Hebrewes as R. Sâ—lamon that the woman is said to be against man because she is contrary to him 2. Nor yet doe wee like of Tostatus conjecture because the male and female in respect of their naturall parts are contrary 3. Nor yet doe wee approve David Kimchi his collection that the woman is said to bee as before man that is as a servant to attend vpon him for shee is appointed to bee his fellow-helper not his servant neither is it like that if shee had beene ordained to any base use or service that she should have beene framed out of Adams side 4. Therefore shee is called a helpe like to man as Hierome readeth or according to him as the Septuagint or as before him as the Hebrew both because shee was made like unto man as well in proportion of body as in the qualities of the mind being created according to the image of God as also for that she was meet for man necessary for the procreation education of children and profitable for the disposing of houshold affaires 5. This maketh a manifest difference betweene woman which is alwayes before man cohabiting and conversing with him and other females which after their copulation forsake their males Luther QVEST. XXXIII When the woman was formed A Further doubt is moved by some at what time the woman was made where 1. wee reject the conceit of Cajetanus who making an allegory of this story of the framing of the woman out of Adams side is forced to affirme that God made man and woman together upon the sixth day and not the woman out of the man for thus the history of Moses is called into question and as well may the whole discourse of the creation of the world be allegorised as this narration of the making of woman And again it is contrary to the Apostle who saith that the woman was of the man 1 Cor. 11.9 2. We likewise refuse the opinion of Catharinus who thinketh the woman to have been made the seventh day for this also is contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 In six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth the sea and all that in them is 3. So then we hold that the woman was made of a rib out of Adams side as Moses setteth it downe neither made together with him out of the earth nor yet made so long after him upon the seventh day but she was formed upon the sixâ—h day