Vers 4. Eleazar begat Phinehas Phinehas begat Abishua c. Eleazar succeeded his father Aaron in the high priesthood in the fourtieth yeare after their coming out of Egypt Numb 20.25 c. and 33.18 and was high priest all the time of Joshua and died immediately after him as may seem by the relation of their deaths together Josh 24.29 33. Phinehas his sonne that succeeded him was he that slew Zimri and Cozbi in the wildernesse and had thereupon a promise from God that the high priesthood should be settled upon him and his seed for ever see Numb 25.7 13. He succeeded his father Eleazar about the death of Joshua Josh 24.29 33. How long he lived high priest it is no where expressed but probable it is he was high priest all the time that the people served the Lord after Joshuahs death in the dayes of the elders that out-lived Joshua Judg. 2.7 and perhaps in the time of the first revolting of the people in the time of the Judges which must needs then be a matter of much grief to a man of such zeal as he was for it is evident that when the Israelites made warre against Benjamin he was high priest Josh 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes As for the next three that follow Abishau Bukki his sonne and Vzzi his sonne they were it seems high priests in those corruptest times of Israel under the Judges whereto agrees that which is by some said that in the dayes of Uzzi it was that Eli and so his posterity after him got the high priests office not being of Eleazars stock but of the stock of Ithamar and if so it were then the foure next following of the stock of Eleazar were never high priests to wit Zerahiah and Meraioth and Amariah and Ahitub but Zadok the sonne of Ahitub vers 8. was the first that recovered that dignity again which was in the dayes of Solomon who thrust out Abiathar of the posterity of Eli and of the stock of Ithamar from being high priest and put Zadok the sonne of Ahitub in his room 1. Kings 2.27 35. Vers 10. And Johanan begat Azariah he it is that executed the priests office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem That is this is that Azariah of whom such honourable mention is made in the book of the Chronicles 2. Chron. 26.16 c. who did so worthily execute maintain the honour and office of the priesthood against the intrusion and usurpation of Uzziah the king of Judah and it is expressely noted that it was in the temple which Solomon built in Jerusalem because at the time when this was written there was another Temple in Jerusalem built by Zerub-babel Yet some understand these words of Johanan the father of Azariah that he was that Jehoiada that was high priest in the dayes of Athaliah by whom both the Temple and Common-wealth were preserved when they were in danger to be ruined by her Vers 13. And Shallum begat Hilâ—iah Who found the book of the Law in the dayes of Josiah 2. Kings 22.8 Vers 14. And Azariah begat Seraiah c. Seraiah was the high priest whom Nebuchadnezzar slew see 2. Kings 25.18 21. He was also the father or grand-father of Ezra Ezra 7.1 Now after these things in the reigne of Artaxerxes king of Persia Ezra the sonne of Seraiah the sonne of Azariah the sonne of Hilkiah c. and then Jehozadak his sonne was the father of Josuah who was so famous at the return of the Jews and the rebuilding of the Temple Hag. 1.1 In the second yeare of Darius the king in the sixth moneth in the first day of the moneth came the word of the Lord by Haggai the Prophet unto Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel governour of Judah and to Josuah the sonne of Josedech the high priest Vers 19. And these are the families of the Levites according to their fathers That is of these before named were the severall families of the Levites called to wit the family of the Libnites c. Vers 20. Of Gershom Libni his sonne Jahath his sonne Zimmah his sonne c. Here follows a catalogue of those that were successively the Heads both of the Gershonites Kohathites and Merarites perhaps unto the dayes of David who did dispose of the Levites into new orders and whereas Zimmah is here said to be the sonne of Jahath thereby is meant that he was his grandchild for Shimei was the sonne of Jahath and Zimmah the sonne of Shimei vers 42 43. Vers 25. And the sonnes of Elkanah Amasai and Ahimoth The sonnes of Elkanah are here more particularly expressed because from him descended that Elkanah who was the father of Samuel Vers 26. As for Elkanah the sonnes of Elkanah Zophai his sonne c. This is another Elkanah who was the sonne of Mahath and grandchild of Amasai mentioned in the former verse as is evident vers 35 36. Vers 27. Jeroham his sonne Elkanah his sonne The father of Samuel Vers 31. And these are they whom David set over the service of song in the house of the Lord c. That is these are they that David made chief in the three quires of singers after the Ark had rest that is after it was brought to Davids house for before it was removed from one place to another to wit these mentioned in the sequel of this chapter Heman of the Kohathites ver 33. who was the chief and therefore had the middle quire and Asaph who stood on Hemans right hand v. 39. and was of the Gershonites and Ethan who was also called Jeduthun chap. 25.1 and was of the Merarites and stood on Hemans left hand ver 44. These were in their times famous men as being the chief singers and withall Prophets and pen-men of some of the Psalmes 2. Chron. 29.30 Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the Lord with the words of David and of Asaph the seer Vers 33. Heman a singer the sonne of Joel the sonne of Shemuel That is Samuel for Heman was Samuels grandchild Vers 50. And these are the sonnes of Aaron Eleazar his sonne Phinehas his sonne c. By occasion of the mention that is made of the severall offices and imployments of the priests in the foregoing verse the catalogue of the sonnes of Eleazar is here again set down unto the dayes of David by whom the priests were divided into foure severall orders Vers 57. And to the sonnes of Aaron they gave the cities of Judah c. And Simeon Josh 21.9 And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities which are here mentioned by name Vers 60. All their cities throughout their families were thirteen cities To wit the eleven here mentioned and Ain in Judahs portion and Gibeon in Benjamins which are reckoned amongst the rest Josh 21.16 17. but
Judges that not long too after the death of Joshua and not according to the order of time as they are here inserted after the death of Samson Concerning which see the note upon vers 6. Vers 2. And he said unto his mother The eleven hundred shekels of silver that were taken from thee about which thou cursedst c. To wit either by cursing those that had stolen it through the violence of her passion or by adjuring those she spake to under a curse to reveal what was become of it if they knew any thing of it Now the bitternesse of his mothers spirit in cursing thus was doubtlesse the greater because she had superstitiously devoted it to a religious use to wit the making of images for her sonne But yet Micah mentions it as being touched in conscience by way of aggravating his sinne implying the reason why he could no longer detain it In mine own hearing saith he thou didst curse those that had taken thy silver from thee or that did not discover where it was yet wretch as I am hitherto I have detained it but no longer dare I lie under a mothers curse and therefore am I now come to confesse my sinne and to restore again the money to you And his mother said Blessed be thou of the Lord my sonne That is free be thou from my curse my sonne and mayst thou be blessed of the Lord and not cursed because thou hast repented of this fact and so ingeniously dost offer to restore what unadvisedly before thou hadst taken away from me Vers 3. His mother said I had wholly dedicated the silver unto the Lord c. Micahs mother here tells him that she had wholly dedicated the silver unto the Lord Jehovah as it is in the Hebrew and yet withall she addes that it was to make idols for him to make a graven image and a molten image whereby it is evident that in these times when many of the Israelites were become idolaters yet they pretended and intended the worship of the true God in their idol-service not esteeming those dumb and dead images gods but onely representations and remembrances of the true God Some question whether this which she spake of a graven image and a molten image was meant of two severall images that she intended should be made of her silver one graven and another molten or of one image which is called a graven and a molten image onely because they did melt their silver and cast it into the form of an image and then did afterwards polish and finish it with graving tools but that two severall images are here intended is evident in the following chapter vers 18. where it is plain that they are named severally And these went into Micahs house and fetched the carved image the ephod and the Teraphim and the molten image Vers 4. Yet he restored the money unto his mother Though she now gave it him freely yet he would not keep it as fearing the disquiet of his conscience if she would bestow it as she vowed she might but he would be sure to rid his hands of it And his mother took two hundred shekels of silver and gave them to the founder who made thereof a graven image and a molten image c. The other nine hundred shekels were therefore it seems laid out in providing an ephod and other ornaments for the priest in providing their teraphim and whatsoever else was requisite for the idolatrous worship oâ— theâ— false gods Vers 5. And the man Micah had an house of gods c. That is a chappel consecrated to these superstitious devotions and made an ephod under which are comprehended all other garments for the priests and teraphim now these teraphim were a speciall sort of images distinguished by that name from all other sorts of images 2. Kings 23.24 Moreover the workers with familiar spirits and the wizards and the images the teraphim it is in the originall and the idols and all the abominations that were spied in the land of Judah and in Jerusalem did Josiah put away It seems they had the shape of men 1. Sam. 19.13 And Michael took an image and laid in the bed for there also Michaels image is in the originall called teraphim and that they made use of them as oracles and received from them answers what to do in doubtfull cases Ezek. 21.21 The king of Babylon stood at the parting of the way at the head of the two wayes to use divination he made his arrows bright he consulted with images or teraphim Zach. 10.2 The idols or teraphim have spoken vanity and the diviners have seen a lie and have told false dreams and it may well be that this made the Danites enquire at Micahs house concerning the successe of their journey Vers 6. In those dayes there was no king in Israel c. That is in those dayes when Micah did this before related But when was this The time is not expressely set down some conceive this was done after Samsons death and that therefore it is next related in the course of the history but the most probable opinion is that both this and all that followeth to the end of this book were done long before Samsons death and are here onely related apart by themselves that the story of the Judges the main thing intended in the former part of the book might not be interrupted first because it is not probable that the Danites being a populous â—â—be and straitened in their dwelling by reason of the Amorites so long before Judg. 1.34 And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain for they would not let them come into the valley would stay so many years ere they would look out to enlarge their borders which how they did and how they stole away Micahs gods is related in the following chapter But especially because in the warre of Israel against Benjamin which is largely related in the three last chapters of this book Phinehas ministred before the Lord chap. 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes saying Shall I yet again go out to battel against the children of Benjamin my brother who killed Zimri and Cozbi Numb 25.7 above three hundred years before Samsons death It seems therefore either this was done immediately after the death of Joshua and those elders who all their time kept the people from revolting from God Judg. 2.7 And the people served the Lord all the dayes of Joshua and and all the dayes of the elders that outlived Joshua who had seen all the great works of the Lord which he did for Israel and then the meaning of the words may be there was no King in Israel that there was no ordinary supreme magistrate neither King nor Judge to restrain the people from these wicked courses or else that it was done in the time of some of the Judges that followed next after Joshua and then the meaning of
ever a whit the more question these divine Oracles Surely the Scripture is the Churches Magna Charta whereon all our priviledges and all our hopes depend as we are Christians and therefore I hope none that professe themselves fellow-citizens of the saints will suffer such a treasure as this to be taken from them No but the more violently Satan rageth against it the more we should prize it and the more diligently we should exercise our selves in the study of it Now Reader if herein this which I send forth abroad for the good of the Church shall afford thee any help blesse God for it and pray for him who is Thine in the Lord Jesus ARTHUR JACKSON Faults escaped Page 19 line 14 for now they reade and so now they p. 56. l 7 devided r. decided p. 8. l. 13. into parts r. into two parts p 135. l. 11. Ephraim quarrelled r. Ephraims quarrell p. 149. l. 10. retained r. reclaimed p. 181. l. 26 Michael r. Michal and l. 27 Michaels r. Michals p. 291. l. 4 understanding r. undertaking p. 301. l 45. pillars r. pillows p. 337. l. 4. and lived r. that is he lived p. 429. l. 29. it is Isaiah r. is that Isaiah p. 468. l. 17. after set out adde for the most holy place p. 507. l. 3â— after what God adde required p 513. l. 30. between r. from p 514 l. 3 indeed after r. indeed because after p. 656. l. 7. were carried r. were not carried l 40 off him r. off to him p. 669 l. 4. foure r. foure and twenty l. 31. we r. aâ—e p. 684. l. ult 2. 6. r. 2. Sam 6 p 712. l. 1. observed r. offered p. 736. l. 17. was absolute r. was not absolute and for also r. all p. 741. l. 24. at least r. at last p. 757. l. 20. the readily r the more readily p 760. l 37. Hanani r. Nehemiah p 773. l. 3 quality r. quantity l 4. durst do r. durst not do p. 805 l. 43 dele him ANNOTATIONS Upon the book of JOSHUA CHAP. I. NOw after the death of Moses the servant of the Lord it came to passe that the Lord spake unto Joshua c. Here begins the history of Israels commonwealth under the government of Joshua and therefore is this book called the book of Joshua Some adde also that it was so called because it was written by Joshua which may be judged the more probable first because the example of Moses herein who wrote the State of Israels common-wealth in his time might be a strong inducement to Joshua to do the like and secondly because that place chap 24.26 And Joshua wrote these words in the book of the Law of God c. is an evident proof that he wrote some part of this book if not that he wrote it all It is true there are some passages in this book which could not be written by Joshua as 1. That mention which is made of the book of Jasher Chap. 10.13 And the Sunne stood still and the Moon stayed untill the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies Is not this written in the book of Jasher for this book of Jasher was written after Davids time as is evident 2. Sam. 1.18 where it is said that David bid them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow behold it was written in the book of Jasher 2. That story of the expedition of the Danites when they took Laish mentioned in this book of Joshua chap. 19.47 which was long after that Judges 18.1 c. and 3. The relation of Joshua his death and buriall chap. 24.29 30. These things and some others that might be picked out could not indeed be written by Joshua but though the book it self were written by Joshua yet these passages might be inserted afterwards by some other Penman of the holy Ghost for so also in the foregoing books which all men yield were written by Moses we find some passages too that could not be written by Moses himself but were afterwards added by some other as is noted upon that relation of the death buriall of Moses Deut. 34.5 c. However sufficient it is for us to know that whoever wrote this book he wrote it by the inspiration of the holy Ghost for hereto there is a testimonie given in the new Testament where some passages thereof are cited as parts of the sacred Scripture the word of God as that which in this chapter is spoken to Joshua and cited by S. Paul Heb. 13.5 I will never leave thee nor forsake thee As for this first passage wherewith this book begins it shews how Joshua received a command from God to lead the Israelites over Jordan into the land of Canaan the Lord had before appointed that Joshua should succeed Moses in the government of Israel Numb 27.18 and upon the laying of Moses hands upon him he had received an extraordinary measure of the gifts of Gods spirit to inable him for the government Deut. 34.9 And therefore doubtlesse immediately after the death of Moses Joshua took upon him the supreme Magistracy But here now we are told how either at that time so soon as Moses was dead or rather after the thirty dayes that were spent in lamenting the death of Moses Deut. 34.8 the Lord spake unto Joshua the sonne of Nun Moses minister and gave him that charge which is here after related Whether God spake this to Joshua by an audible voice by the secret instinct of his spirit in some dream or vision or by the high-priests inquiring for him by the Vrim and Thummim we cannot conclude because we find it not expressed onely we find that God had formerly promised that Eleazar the priest should ask counsel for him after the judgement of Vrim before the Lord Num. 27.21 But for this title given here to Joshua that he was Moses minister the Lord spake unto Joshua Moses minister we may well think that was purposely added to imply one reason amongst others why Joshua was most fit to succeed Moses in the government to wit because having been so many years together his minister by his continuall daily conversation with Moses he could not but learn much thereby to prepare and fit him the better for this service Vers 2. Moses my servant is dead now therefore arise c. Here the Lord exhorts Joshua that since Moses was dead he should now lead the Israelites over Jordan and carry them into the land which according to his former promises made to their fathers he was now ready to conferre upon them Now in mentioning the death of Moses he useth this expression Moses my servant is dead first and principally to imply what it was he required of him to wit that as their captain and supreme governour he should now conduct them into the land of Canaan for Moses is here called Gods servant in regard of the supreme magistracy whereto God had advanced him and so the drift of the words is that since Moses
siege at Gibeon was now encamped before Makkedah whilst the rest went further in the pursuit of the flying Canaanites therefore it is said here of those that had been in that pursuit of the Canaanites that they returned to the camp to Joshua at Makkedah None moved his tongue against any of the children of Israel This is a proverbiall speech but the meaning is that the Canaanites durst not make the least resistance against the Israelites that pursued them so farre they were from lifting up a hand against them that they scarse durst mutter against them See the note upon Exodus 11.7 Vers 24. Come near put your feet upon the necks of these kings This Joshua enjoyned his Captains to do not out of a cruel proud insulting mind but first to teach them that they were to shew no mercy to this people secondly to encourage and hearten the Captains for the time to come as by intimating that thus they should tread all their enemies under their feet vers 25. And Joshua said unto them Fear not not nor be dismaid be strong and of good courage for thus shall the Lord do to all your enemies against whom ye fight thirdly to manifest Gods singular love to them and precious esteem of them who was pleased to let them tread upon the necks of kings and fourthly that this formidable sight might make them fear to imitate the manners of this people against whom God had shown such severity Yea in this was Joshua a type of Christ who doth tread Satan under the feet of his people Rom. 16.20 in and through whom we are more then conquerours Rom. 8.37 yea even over those principalities and powers whom having spoyled he made a shew of them openly triumphing over them Col. 2.15 Vers 26. And afterwards Joshua smote them and slew them and hanged them on five trees See the note upon chap. 8.29 Vers 28. And that day Joshua took Makkedah c. The same day wherein the sunne stood still for whilst some of his souldiers were pursuing the broken troops of their enemies he with the chief strength of his armie had encamped about Makkedah vers 21. And all the people returned to the camp to Joshua at Makkedah in peace and therefore if withall we consider what a terrour they might be stricken with by the report of those that fled into their cities and told them of his vanquishing of the five kings I see not why it may not be thought that it was surprised that very day Vers 31. And Joshua passed from Libnah and all Israel with him unto Lachish c. Whose king was one of the five that came up against Gibeon vers 5. Vers 32. And the Lord delivered Lachish into the hand of Israel which took it on the second day To wit the second day after he had besieged it Vers 34. And from Lachish Joshua passed unto Eglon c. Whose king was also one of the five that came against Gibeon vers 5. Vers 35. And they took it on that day That is on the day they showed themselves first before it Vers 37. And they took it and smote it with the edge of the sword and the king thereof and all the cities thereof c. This Hebron doubtlesse was one of their chiefest cities as appears by the mention that is here made of other cities that were under the jurisdiction of this city and taken together with it The King of this citie was also one of the five that came up against Gibeon as we may see vers 5. so that he was slain and hanged at Makkedah with the other vers 23 26. either therefore his death is here onely again repeated in this relation of the sacking of this city or else upon the tidings of the death of their King they chose another who was also now slain with the rest of the people How this city is said afterwards to have been taken by Caleb see in the note upon chap. 15.13 14. Vers 38. And Joshua returned and all Israel with him to Debir and fought against it Concerning this also see the note upon chap. 15.14 Vers 40. He left none remaining but utterly destroyed all that breathed as the Lord God of Israel commanded Many thousands of men women and children were doubtlesse slain in destroying all these cities and the countrey there about lest therefore it should be thought an act of crueltie and inhumanity thus without pitty to shed the bloud of this people the just warrant that he had from Gods command is here expressed to wit that he did in all this as the Lord God of Israel commanded CHAP. XI Vers 1. ANd it came to passe when Jabin king of Hazor had heard those things that he sent to Jobab king of Madon and to the king of Shimron c. Called Shimron-meron chap. 12.10 Very observable was the providence of God in that which is here related to wit that he did not suffer all the kings of the Canaanites at once to joyn their forces together and set upon the Israelites but some at one time and some at another which the Lord doubtlesse did out of his fatherly indulgence towards his people and the tender respect he had to their weaknesse Had these kings here mentioned joyned with the other five whom the Israelites had before vanquished the Israelites must needs be stricken with great terrour and fear And therefore the Lord was pleased so to infatuate and stupifie these that they were quiet and moved not till their neighbours were destroyed by which means the Israelites were heartned with the conquest of the first ere the other set upon them and they had leisure to refresh themselves in their camp at Gilgal ere they were called forth to go upon another service Vers 2. And to the kings that were on the North of the mountains and of the plains south of Cinneroth c. That is the plains that lay southward of the countrey called Cinneroth and Deut. 3.17 Chinnereth afterward Gennesareth of which see the note upon Numb 34.10 Vers 3. And to the Hivite under Hermon in the land of Mizpeh It is thought by some that the Hivites here mentioned to whom the king of Hazor sent that he might draw them into this confederacy against Israel are described by the place of their habitation the Hivite under Hermon in the land of Mizpeh purposely to distinguish them from the Gibeonites who were also Hivites that we might not think that they were now sollicited to break the league which they had made with the Israelites Vers 6. Be not afraid because of them for to morrow about this time will I deliver them up all slain before Israel It may be that Joshua was at this time somewhat the more distressed not onely because of the great number of the enemie who were as the sand of the sea-shore for multitude vers 5. but also because the greatest strength of their armie consisted in horse and chariots of which in the battels
is said in the foregoing verse it was because the inhabitants did all so obstinately stand it out against the Israelites none of them attempting to procure conditions of peace from them save onely the Gibeonites Vers 20. For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts c. See the note upon Exod. 7.13 Vers 21. And at that time came Joshua and cut off the Anakims from the mountains from Hebron and from Debir c. Concerning these Anakims see what is noted before upon Numb 13.22 where it is also expressely said that the Israelites that were at first sent to search the land of Canaan saw these Anakims about Hebron from whence Joshua did now drive them It is evident that Hebron yea and Debir too or else another city of the same name was formerly taken by Joshua and the Israelites in that their expedition against those five kings that had joyned their forces together to besiege Gibeon as we may see chap. 10.36 37.38 That therefore which is said here that Joshua cut off the Anakims from Hebron from Debir c. must be understood of his cutting them off from the mountains that were about Hebron and Debir It seems that these gyants being a kind of wild salvage men monsters rather then men did chiefly abide in dens and caves that were in the mountains or at least that when Joshua had prevailed in that part of the land and had taken the severall towns and cities there and destroyed the inhabitants many of these monsters had withdrawn themselves to those their fastnesses and strong holds from whence afterwards they brake forth into the countreys adjoyning and so thereupon Joshua went out against them with his forces and cut them off some at one time and some at another from the mountains from Hebron from Debir from Anab that is the mountains adjoyning to those cities and from all the mountains of Judah and from all the mountains of Israel that is the mountains in that portion of the land which fell to the tribe of Judah and indeed from all the mountains throughout the land of Canaan which fell to the rest of the Israelites for Judah by reason of their dignity is often mentioned as distinct from the other tribes and in this regard I conceive this expression is used from all the mountains of Judah and from all the mountains of Israel and not with reference to that division of the land betwixt the kingdome of Judah and the kingdome of Israel in Jeroboams revolt it being most probable that this book was written before that time even before David had cast out the Jebusites out of Jerusalem as may be gathered from that place chap. 15.63 As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day The greatest difficulty in this place is this that here it is said that Joshua cut off the Anakims from Hebron from Debir c. cities that he had taken before from the inhabitants chap. 10.36 c. and yet afterwards chap. 15.14 it is said that Caleb took Hebron and drove the Anakims thence To this some answer That though Joshua took Hebron and afterwards cut off the Anakims from the mountains about Hebron as it is here said yet in processe of time the inhabitants and especially these Anakims did again seise upon Hebron and possesse it and so were after Joshuas death driven out thence by Caleb for though this be related chap. 15.14 yet that it was not done till after the death of Joshua is evident they say in the first chapter of Judges vers 9. where the same story is again related But because it is evident in the fourteenth chapter of this book vers 12. that Caleb whilest Joshua was yet living desired Hebron and the mountainous countrey about it to be given him for his inheritance as Moses had promised it should be undertaking withall that with Gods help he would drive out the Anakims thence Give me saith he this mountain c. If so be the Lord will be with me then I shall be able to drive them out as the Lord said nor is it probable that ever the Lord suffered the Canaanites to recover one foot of that land out of which Joshua had expelled them till after the death of Joshua when by their sinnes they provoked the Lord against them nor that the valourous Caleb would suffer the Canaanites to roost so long in that place which was given him for his inheritance as till after the death of Joshua therefore I conceive that the truer answer for the resolving of this difficulty is this That it was Caleb that did drive out the Anakims out of the mountains about Hebron as is related chap. 15.14 onely it is here ascribed to Joshua because Joshua was their chief Generall and so it was done under his government and command though it were done by Caleb However the destroying the Anakims throughout the land of Canaan is here particularly recorded that in Gods goodnesse and power in cutting them now off they might see the folly of their forefathers infidelity who were so scared with the sight and report of the formidable stature of these giants that they would not enter the land notwithstanding all that Moses Joshua and Caleb could say to them Vers 22. There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel onely in Gaza in Gath c. These were cities of the Philistims whose land was also within the compasse of the promise made to the Israelites Exod. 23.31 And I will set thy bounds from the red sea even unto the sea of the Philistims though because of their sinnes they prevailed not as yet so farre In these cities there were of these Anakims these giants still remaining many years after for Goliath was of Gath see 1. Sam. 17.4 c. and those foure huge giants mentioned 2. Sam. 21.16 c. were all of the Philistims Vers 23. And Joshua took the whole land according to all that the Lord said unto Moses c. That is he vanquished the whole land before mentionâ—d or he is said to have taken the whole land because he had so far subdued it that none of the inhabitants durst take up arms against them or any way molest them so that they might now peaceably make a division of it amongst the tribes though there were some places which the Canaanites had yet in their possession as is largely expressed in the beginning of the 13. chapter yet they durst not stirre against the Israelites and therefore is that clause added in the last words of this chapter and the land rested from warre CHAP. XII Vers 1. NOw these are the kings of the land which the children of Israel smote c. In this chapter there are briefly presented as it were in a table or map the severall countreyes and kings vanquished by Moses Joshua and the
whole tribe of Manasseh Judges 5.14 Out of Machir came down govâ—rnours and amongst his posterity it seems that Manassehs portion was now wholly divided But then it may be questioned by some why Machir is here called the first born of Manasseh To which I answer that the child that first openeth the wombe is usually in the Scripture called the first born though there were no more born after him Because he was a man of war therefore he had Gilead and Bashan That is because Machir the father of Gilead was a man of warre Many conceive that Machir had no other sonnes but Gilead and that all Manassehs portion was divided amongst Gileads posteritie But this we may well doubt 1. Because Gen. 50.23 there is mention made of Machirs children 2. Because Num. 26.29 we reade of a family of the Machirites distinct from those that were called by the names of the sonnes of Gilead concerning which see the note on the place However the posterity of Machir had the land of Gilead and Bashan that is the half of it settled upon them which is here mentioned by the way that after he might proceed to speak of their dividing to the other half of this tribe their portion of the land within Jordan and that because Machir was a man of warre that is because the Machirites were men of warre and did themselves win Gilead and dispossesse the enemie of it See the notes Numb 32.39 40. Vers 4. Therefore according to the commandment of the Lord he gave them an inheritance c. See Numb 27.7 Vers 5. And there fell ten portions to Manasseh That is the land was divided into six parts according to the number of the sonnes of Gilead mentioned verse 2. and Hephers part was divided into five parts and given to his sonne Zelophehads five daughters and so there were ten portions in all Vers 7. And the coast of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethah c. If Asher was a town seated at the south-east end of Manassehs lot as some conceive it was then in this and the following verses we have onely the description of the southern bounds of this tribe of Manasseh which were also the north bounds of Ephraims portion as is evident because Michmethah and the other following places here mentioned as Tappuah and the river Kanah are the same that were named before in the north border of Ephraim But if Asher stood as others think in the north-east of Manassehs portion then in the first words we have the east bounds of this half tribe of Manasseh to wit that they were drawn from Asher on the north all along by the river Jordan to Michmethah on the south that lyeth before Shechem and then in the next words we have the southern bounds described from Michmethah to the midland sea to wit that from Michmethah it went a long on the right hand turning westward to Tappuah and so on the south of the river Kanah verse 9. and so right on to the sea and thus as is noted in that ninth verse the land was Manassehs both on the north and south side of the river Kanah though the cities that stood on the south side of that river belonged to Ephraim which is intended in those words these cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh that is the cities on the south side of the river belonged to Ephraim though they were within the coasts of Manasseh Vers 10. And they met together in Asher on the north and on Issachar on the east That is the north bounds of Josephs portion to wit Ephraims and Manassehs considered joyntly in one was the tribe of Asher on the north and Issachar on the east For otherwise then thus it cannot be conceived how they should meet together in Asher on the north since Ephraim no where could reach to Asher being bounded as Manasseh also was on the west by the main sea Vers 11. And Manasseh had in Issachar and in Asher Beth-shean and her towns c. even three countreys This is added to intimate that these towns to wit Bethshean Iblâ—am Dor and En-dor whither Saul went to a witch and Taanach and Megiddo being in the confines of Asher and Issachar and yet belonging to Manasseh stood not all in one place but were in three severall tracts of ground Or else it may be added to shew that three of the countreys before mentioned were in Ashers portion and three in Issachars and so Manasseh had in each of them three countreys Vers 12. Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities c. This is spoken of the times after the death of Joshua and therefore the same is repeated Judg. 1.27 28. Partly through cowardlinesse and partly through Gods withdrawing his help at first they could not drive them out afterwards when their fear could not so much blind their judgements but that they must needs then acknowledge themselves strong enough yet they put them to tribute which did much aggravate their sinne Vers 14. And the children of Joseph spake unto Joshua saying Why hast thou given me but one lot c. Here the story relates how the sonnes of Joseph that is the two tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh came to Joshua and made a great complaint and it was doubtlesse after they had entred upon the land which fell to them by lot that there was not a convenient portion of land assigned to them for their inheritance no more indeed then was fitting to be the lot of one tribe for that is the meaning of those words Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit that is why hast thou given us no more of the land then if we had been to be accounted but as one tribe and so to have but one lot Questionlesse Joshua and the rest that were intrusted in this businesse had not either through ignorance or partiality set forth a lesse portion of land for these sonnes of Joseph then was fitting But because a part of the land allotted them was over-grown with wood and a great part of it was still in the possession of the Perizzites and the Rephaims or giants with whom through infidelity and sloth they affraid to encounter therefore they judging this as nothing conclude they had no more given them to dwell in then might well be reckoned the portion of one tribe The most questionable passage in this complaint of theirs is this that to make good that they had not a competent portion of land assigned them they alledge the extraordinary encrease of their people in number through the speciall blessing of God upon them Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit seeing I am a great people forasmuch as the Lord hath blessed me hitherto since it is evident as is noted Num. 26.37 that the sonnes of Ephraim when they were numbred the second time a little before their entrance into Canaan were eight thousand
these first that he might be near hand to Joshua who dwelt in mount Ephraim to the end that by him he might enquire of the Lord upon any speciall service Secondly that he might be the nearer to the Tabernacle which at this time was in Shiloh a city in Ephraim ANNOTATIONS Upon the book of JUDGES CHAP. I. NOw after the death of Joshua c. In this book the history of the Commonwealth of Israel is continued from the death of Joshua to the dayes of Eli all which time at least the most of which time they lived under the command and government of certain Judges whom God successively raised up to rule over them as his deputies and vicegerents and therefore is this book called the book of Judges for though Eli and Samuel may well be numbred amongst the Judges of Israel because they commanded in chief after the same way of government as these did whose history is recorded in this book yet because the change of the government from that of Judges to that of Kings happened in the daies of Samuel and the story of Samuel must needs be begun from the dayes of Eli therefore the acts of their times are not recorded here but are reserved to another book Who wrote this book is no where expressed it sufficeth us to know that it hath alwaies been kept in the Church amongst those Oracles of God whose penmen were guided by the infallible inspiration of his Spirit and indeed one passage of this book to wit that concerning Sampson chap. 13.7 the child shall be a Nazarite to God is by the judgement of many learned Expositours principally intended by the Evangelist S. Matthew where he undertakes to alledge a testimony out of the writings of Gods Prophets Matt. 2.23 And he came and dwelt in a citie called Nazareth that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet He shall be called a Nazarene The children of Israel asked the Lord saying Who shall go up for us against the Canaanites first to fight with them In the last years of Joshua his government the Israelites had lived in peace Josh 21.44 And the Lord gave them rest round about according to all that he sware unto their fathers and there stood not a man of all their enemies before them the Lord delivered all their enemies into their hand the Canaanites not daring to provoke them and the Israelites not yet attempting any further upon the Canaanites partly because the land they had already vanquished was as much as they could well people partly perhaps out of an over-eager desire to and love of the rest they now enjoyed and indeed they knew it was agreeable to the will of God that they should not drive out all the inhabitants at once but by degrees Deut. 7.22 And the Lord thy God will put out these nations from before thee by little and little Thou maist not consume them at once lest the beasts of the field encrease upon thee But now Joshua being dead who a little before his death had encouraged them to go forward in expelling the Canaanites though they had no man chosen of God to command over them in chief as Moses and Joshua did yet finding that indeed it was now fit they should proceed on in the warre they assembled themselves together as it seems at Shiloh and there resolved to renew their battels against the inhabitants of the land onely because the successe of their first attempts would be a matter of great consequence either for the encouragement or disheartning the people therefore they would first enquire of the Lord which accordingly they did they asked the Lord as it is here said to wit by Phinehas the high priest or Eleazar if he were yet living which is doubtfull because he died immediatly after the death of Joshua Josh 24.33 before the propitiatory or mercy-seat who shall go up for us against the Canaanites first to fight against them that is which of our tribes shall first begin and set upon the inhabitants that still abide in their lot for this is doubtlesse the meaning of this question they asked Vers 2. And the Lord said Judah shall go up c. That is the tribe of Judah because that was the most populous and the strongest of the tribes and had their portion in the chief of the land which it was therefore fit should be first cleared of the enemie therefore they were appointed first to begin the warre and besides thus was that still accomplished which Jacob prophecied concerning the preheminence this tribe should have above the rest Gen. 49.8 Judah thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies thy fathers children shall bow down before thee Vers 3. And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me c. The Simeonites were brethren to those of Judah both by father and mother but besides their cohabitation was another tie betwixt them in regard whereof they lived in the same lot as brethren in one and the same house and in this respect chiefly is Simeon called Judahs brother Vers 4. And Judah went up and the Lord delivered the Canaanites c. That is one particular people of this countrey so called And they slew of them in Bezek ten thousand men That is in and about Bezek to wit in taking the town or after they had taken it when the king fled thence to save his life as is more particularly after related Vers 6. But Adoni-Bezek fled and they pursued after him and caught him and cut off his thumbs and his great toes And thus as he had done to many other kings as himself confesseth in the following verse to wit either out of a kind of barbarous sporting crueltie or else to render them thereby unfit for warre ever after that by the al-ruling providence of God is now done to him by the Israelites that had now taken him prisoner Indeed we reade not that Gods people were wont to inflict any such strange kind of punishment upon those that were vanquished by them nor doth it stand with piety thus to torture and afflict those that are taken in warre with such studied and uncoucht wayes of punishment and besides the Israelites had an expresse command not to spare the lives of any of these nations but presently to cut them off and therefore as it is likely that some speciall reason moved the Israelites to inflict this unusuall punishment upon him so I conceive it most probable that either when they took the city they found some of these poore captive kings that had been thus inhumanely used by him a spectacle that might well stirre their spirits against him or at least that they might receive information from others herein and so might be moved thereby to deal with him as he had dealt with others as judging it consonant to that Law of retaliation which God established amongst his people Eye for eye tooth for tooth hand for
hand foot for foot Exod. 21.24 Some Expositours indeed conceive that the Israelites knew not of this particular cruelty that he had used to others till himself acknowledged the just hand of God upon him herein verse 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and their great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table and so they ascribe this which the Israelites did wholly to the secret providence of God who moved them thus to return his cruelty upon himself they not knowing why they did it But no such thing can be necessarily inferred from his acknowledgement of that which he had done to the kings that he had conquered for either to confesse how many kings he had used so or out of remorse of conscience being as it were constrained to confesse that it was the just vengeance of God upon him he might well say what he did though he knew the Israelites had purposely done thus to him because he had formerly done so to others Vers 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table c. This need not seem strange to us if we consider first what petty kings there were in those times and secondly that this may be understood of so many kings who at severall times had been thus used not that there were seventy all at one time thus waiting upon him though even that is not so incredible considering that in those dayes every city almost had a severall king And as for their gathering or gleaning their meat under his table the meaning is not that they lay like dogs under the table but that they were kept as slaves in such a manner that for hunger they were glad to gather up the crumbs and scraps that fell under the kings table as having nothing allowed them to eat but that and happely the king to please himself with this cruell spectacle did sometimes cause them to be fetched in when he was in his cups feasting himself that he might see them in this piteous plight whereunto he had brought them and insult over them And they brought him to Jerusalem and there he died To Jerusalem I conceive they brought him as a spectacle worthy to be beheld that men might learn by him how just God is in punishing men according to the nature of their wickednesse and therefore it is most likely also that he dyed there presently of the wounds he had received in the warre in that severe punishment that was inflicted on him or else that he was kept there upon this extraordinary occasion purposely that men might see in him how God abhorres such cruelty as his was he being otherwise one of those accursed nations that might not be spared Vers 8. Now the children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it c. That is before Joshuas death for this is added to shew the reason why they carryed him to Jerusalem to wit because Jerusalem that is that part of Jerusalem that was in Judahs lot was now in their possession though not the fort So that most Expositours hold that both this and the following verses unto verse 17. are a repetition of the memorable acts done by the tribe of Judah whilest Joshua was now living Indeed before the land was divided all Israel fought as in one army against the Canaanites but after the tribes were seated in their severall portions each tribe made warre against the inhabitants in their severall lots and thus the men of Judah are here said to have done these things here related for it is not necessary to hold that Jerusalem was taken when the king thereof was slain Josh 10.23 See the note Josh 15.63 Vers 9. And afterwards the children of Judah went down to fight against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountain c. That is from Jerusalem which stood in a mountainous countrey Psalme 125.2 As the mountains are round about Jerusalem so the Lord is round about his people Vers 10. And Judah went against the Canaanites that dwelt in Hebron c. That is against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountains about Hebron which they did in the dayes of Joshua and under the conduct of Caleb who then commanded in chief It is evident that Hebron was taken by Joshua concerning which see the note Joshua 10.37 and that afterwards Caleb drove out the giants that had possessed themselves of the strong holds in and about Hebron Ioshua 15.13 14. Concerning which see the note Ioshua 11.21 But because the Authour of this history was here to relate the memorable exploits that were done by the men of Iudah therefore together with those noble acts which they did after the death of Ioshua he repeats also those that were done by them whilest Ioshua was yet living under the command of Caleb both against Hebron and against Debir in the following verses so to set forth the glory of this tribe the more fully Vers 11. And from thence he went against the inhabitants of Debir c. See the notes that concern these following verses Ioshua 15.15 16 c. Vers 16. And the children of the Kenite Moses father in Law went up out of the city of palm-trees c. That is out of Jericho Deut. 34.3 the plain of the valley of Jericho the city of palm-trees Concerning these Kenites see the note upon Numb 10.31 in tents they alwayes dwelt chap. 4.17 Howbeit Sisera fled away on his feet to the tent of Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite it seems therefore that being appointed to have their lot with Judah having formerly dwelt in their tents in the countrey about Jericho for Jericho it self was many years ago destroyed Josh 6.24 after Judahs portion was cleared they removed with them to the wildernesse of Judah there to dwell with the men of Judah as Moses had promised to Hobab the Kenite Num. 10.32 And it shall be if thou go with us yea it shall be that what goodnesse the Lord shall do unto us the same will we do unto thee Vers 17. And Judah went with Simeon his brother To wit to help Simeon in the clearing his lot as before Simeon had helped Judah vers 3. And they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephah and utterly destroyed it and the name of the citie was called Hormah That is utter destruction they were not wont thus utterly to destroy all the cities they took it is therefore probable that they did thus destroy this place because of the vow which the Israelites had made long since when Arad the king of the Canaanites made warre against them see the note Numb 21.3 and the mention of Arad in the foregoing verse makes this opinion the more probable Vers 18. Also Judah took Gaza with the coast thereof c. Yet it seems soon after the Philistines recovered these cities with the coasts thereof and drave out the Israelites ere they could well settle themselves therein to wit because
they began presently to provoke the Lord with their sinnes For it is evident that these cities were not long after this inhabited by the Philistines chap. 3.1 2 3. Now these are â—he nations which the Lord left to prove Israel by them c. Namely five Lords of the Philistines c. and so again 1. Sam. 6.17 Now these are the golden Emerods which the Philistines returned for a trespasse-offering unto the Lord For Ashdod one for Gaza one for Askelon one for Gath one for Ekron one As for Ekron one of the cities here mentioned it was in Dans lot Josh 19.43 therefore it seems that the tribe of Judah joyned with those of Dan as well as with those of Simeon for the clearing of their coasts the rather because they could not hold those cities they had gotten from the Philistines if they had let them alone in this neighbouring citie Vers 19. And the Lord was with Judah and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain This clause and the Lord was with Judah is added to shew of what difficulty their attempts were if the Lord had not been with them and withall to condemne their cowardise that durst not proceed in their conquests against the inhabitants of the valleys having had such incouraging experience of Gods assistance But could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley because they had chariots of iron Their own fears disabling them and God for their sinnes withdrawing himself from them Concerning these chariots of iron see the note Josh 17.16 Vers 21. And the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem c. See Josh 15.63 Vers 26. And the man went into the land of the Hittites and built a city Whence it seems probable that the Israelites did not onely spare his life and the life of his family but also gave him a rich reward to wit for shewing them the way into Bethel as is before said Vers 27. Neither did Manasseh drive out the inhabitants of Bethshean c. See the note Josh 17.12 Thus in the dayes after the death of Joshua when it seems they had no one set over them in chief but were onely governed by the joynt-authority of the Elders in each tribe they began to be remisse in endeavouring to drive out the remainder of the Canaanites that dwelt in the land but were content to make peace with them and this was the first step of their defection from God which did by degrees lead them into grosser sinnes and greatly provoked the Lord to displeasure against them Vers 35. Yet the hand of the house of Joseph prevailed so that they became tributaries That is though the Danites were sorely for a time oppressed by the Amorites as is expressed before vers 34. And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain for they would not suffer them to come down to the valley yet afterward with the help of the sonnes of Joseph who bordered upon Dans portion and came up to aid them they prevailed against them so that they became tributaries Vers And the coast of the Amorites was from the going up to Akrabbim from the rock and upward This is added to shew how the Israelites through their own sloth suffered themselves to be hemmed in with these accursed enemies CHAP. II. Vers 1. ANd an Angel of the Lord came up from Gilgal to Bochim It is very hard to determine whether this were an Angel indeed or some man either priest or prophet that by speciall commission was sent at this time from God unto the people to reprove them for their sinnes The word in the originall may well be translated either angell or messenger as it is in the margin of our bibles and the reasons are very considerable which have moved many to think that it was some man of God that was sent to them to wit first because it is said that he came up from Gilgal not that he came down from heaven and so appeared to them and secondly because he spake in a generall assembly as is evident vers 4. where it is said that he spake unto all the children of Israel whereas the apparitions of Angels have been usually onely to some particular men in private But yet the most of Expositours conceive that it was a true Angel and that having assumed for this present service the body of man the Scripture therefore speaks of him as a man that he came up from Gilgal to Bochim and this they hold 1. Because he speaks after the manner of Angels not thus saith the Lord as the prophets were wont to speak but as in the person of God I made you to go up out of Egypt and 2. Because the Authour of this book elsewhere speaks differently of the prophet and the Angel as chap. 6.8 The Lord sent a prophet unto the children of Israel which said unto them Thus saith the Lord God of Israel I brought you up from Egypt and brought you forth out of the house of bondage But then vers 12. And the Angel of the Lord appeared unto him that is to Gideon and said unto him The Lord is with thee thou mighty man of valour Yea some hold that it was the sonne of God the Angel of the covenant who was wont thus to appear to the fathers and that because he ascribes here to himself that which was the work of God as the bringing this people out of Egypt and the making of a covenant with them However most probable it is that this was done in the dayes of the Elders that outlived Joshua and that before they began to worship the Gods of the nations they dwelt amongst for else doubtlesse this Angel or messenger of the Lord would have reproved them for their idolatry as well as for making a league of peace with the land It seems therefore that finding themselves sorely annoyed by the Canaanites in severall parts of the land there was an assembly of the people called of all the tribes that they might consult what was fit to be done and so thereupon the Lord sent his Angel to them with a message and very likely it is that it was some place about Shiloh where the people were now met together which upon occasion of the peoples weeping here was called Bochim that is weepers For first thither the tribes used to assemble themselves especially at their three solemn feasts and some generall assembly of the people there was at this time as is before noted and secondly the people did offer sacrifices there vers 5. and that they might onely do where the altar and tabernacle was Vers 2. But ye have not obeyed my voice why have ye done this That is consider how great and inexcusable your sinne is for these words why have ye done this are as much in effect as if he had said that they had not the least colour for that they had done and that if they were challenged to give a reason
why they had done it they could have nothing to say for themselves Vers 3. But they shall be as thorns in your sides See the note Numb 31.55 Vers 5. And they called the name of that place Bochim and they sacrificed there unto the Lord. Though by divine dispensation or at least Gods conniving at it the faithfull servants of God did sometimes sacrifice in other places then the Tabernacle for so did Samuel at Mizpeh 1. Sam. 7.6 and Gideon in Ophrah Judg. 6.24 yet there is no necessity that can force us to say it was so here For this Bochim might be in Shiloh or near about it where the Tabernacle was as is noted above vers 1. Vers 6. And when Joshua had let the people go the children of Israel went c. In the following part of this chapter is laid down in generall the summe of the whole book to wit Israels idolatrie and Gods dealing with them both in punishing them and delivering them again But the death of Joshua and the Elders which had seen the works of the Lord made way to this defection of Israel and therefore the story first begins with that and tells us how Joshua dismissed them from the camp where they had as yet continued together and sent them every tribe to their own portion which by lot in the late division of the land God had given them Vers 9. And they buried him in the border of his inheritance in Timnath-heres Josh 24.30 it is called Timnath-serah Vers 10. And there arose another generation after them which knew not the Lord nor yet the works which he had done for Israel We need not inquire whether there were none now alive that knew the works of the Lord for there might be some that did as doubtlesse there were some likewise that did not fall away with the rest to the worship of idols and yet it might be said that there arose another generation that knew not the Lord c. namely because the greatest number was of that generation that had not seen the works of the Lord to wit those works which he did in Egypt yea many of them not those works which he did at their entrance into Canaan the dividing of Jordan c. and these they were that knew not the Lord that is effectually as the other generation had done who by the sight of Gods wondrous works were brought truly to fear the Lord. Vers 11. And the children of Israel did evill in the sight of the Lord and served Baalim That is the severall gods of the nations whom they called Baalim For Baal signifieth a Lord hence were those names so frequent amongst the great men of Carthage of Hannibal and Asdrubal and many others whereupon they called God by way of excellency Baal that is the Lord and when they came by degrees to fall to idolatry every man of renown that after his death was worshiped as a god was called Baal and by some of those eastern nations Bell Esa 46.1 Bell boweth down Nebo stoopeth yea and the severall planets which by the Chaldean Astrologers were said to rule in their severall houses in heaven were called Baalim that is Lords or rulers and so all the severall gods of the Chaldeans Syrians and Canaanites yea and severall idols and images of these gods were called Baalim Vers 13. And they forsook the Lord and served Baalim and Ashtaroth The goddesse of the Sidonians 1. Kings 11.5 And Solomon went after Ashtaroth the goddesse of the Sidonians 2. Kings 23.13 And the high places that were before Jerusalem which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption which Solomon the king of Israel had builded for Ashtaroth the abomination of the Sidonians and of the Philistines 1. Sam. 31.10 And they put his armour in the house of Ashtaroth yet it seems as Baalim was the common name of all their gods so was Ashtaroth the common name of all their goddesses Vers 10. And he delivered them into the hand of the spoilers that spoiled them he sold them into the hand of their enemies round about c. That is not onely suffered the enemies to enter upon the land carry away their goods whereby as with a gentler rod he did at first chastise them but at last he gave their persons also into the hands of those that made warre with them to be their bondslaves as a man should sell his child to be a servant or slave so did the Lord passe away the right which he had in them and put them under the power of the enemie who also sold them away here and there when they pleased Psal 44.12 Thou sellest thy people for nought and dost not increase thy wealth by their price Vers 16. Neverthelesse God raised up judges that delivered them c. That is God stirred up men to undertake the avenging of them upon their enemies and to govern them according to the Laws of God and advanced them above others with the gifts of his Spirit that they might be fit for those great imployments Vers 17. And yet they would not hearken unto their Judges but they went a whoring after other gods c. That is for a while they hearkned unto them but not constantly within a while after they returned unto their evil wayes as it is more fully expressed vers 18 19. As for this phrase of going a whoring after other gods it is used frequently in the Scripture to imply mens unlawfull and base joyning of their souls to idols that were formerly entred into a covenant with God and therefore should have kept themselves solely to him as a wife to her husband and the rather doubtlesse is the blind mad and unreasonable zeal of idolaters compared to the violent and incorrigible lusts of whoremongers because as they that are once inflamed with those lusts are as men bewitched no counsell or perswasion doth any good upon them they care not what they spend what pains they take into what inconveniences they cast themselves so they may satisfie their lusts so it is with idolaters so bewitched they are that there is no disswading them no charge toil or danger can make them give over this abominable sinne Vers 18. For it repented the Lord because of their groanings c. See the note Gen. 6.6 Vers 19. And they returned and corrupted themselves more then their fathers Before it was said vers 19. that they returned quickly out of the way which their fathers walked in which was meant of that generation which was immediately after those that in the dayes of Joshua and the godly Elders after him continued constant in the true Religion but this is now spoken of the children of those that in the following generation did apostatize from the true worship of God these their children though for a time during the life of their Judges they made a show of repentance and forsaking their idolatry yet when their Judges were dead they soon returned again
to the wicked wayes of their idolatrous fathers yea and did worse then they indeed as relapses in regard of sicknesse bring men usually into a more dangerous condition then they were in before so it is with relapses to idolatrie a Church and people that have been reformed and fall back to idolatry are usually farre worse and more grossely superstitious then they were before Vers 22. That through them I may prove Israel whether they will keep the way of the Lord c. These words may be understood two severall wayes for first they may have reference to that clause in the latter end of the foregoing verse where there is mention made of Joshua his leaving the Canaanites unexpelled the nations which Joshua left when he died and then the meaning must be that the nations were not wholly driven out in Joshua's time but were left for the tryall of Israel to wit to see whether they would be drawn away by their idolatries or no And secondly they may have reference to all that which is said in the two foregoing verses Because this people have transgressed my covenant c. I also will not henceforth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died That through them I may prove Israel whether they will keep the way of the Lord c. and then the meaning must be that God for the sinne of the Israelites resolved not to cast out any more of the Canaanites that remained in the land that they might continually oppresse and vex the Israelites and so thereby he might prove them namely whether by these afflictions they would be brought to repent and turn to the Lord and so again to walk in his wayes And indeed both these may be well here comprehended CHAP. III. Vers 2. ONely that the generation of the children of Israel might know to teach them warre c. Two reasons were given in the latter end of the foregoing chapter why the Lord did not wholly cast out the Canaanites out of the land in the dayes of Joshua and here now a third is added Some conceive indeed the meaning of this clause to be this that by leaving the Canaanites amongst them God would now let this wicked generation know to their cost what warre is their fathers by the extraordinary help which the Lord afforded them did soon vanquish their enemies and knew not the misery that warre usually brings with it but this their degenerate posterity being now forsaken of God should know to their sorrow what warre is But according to our translation I conceive the meaning of the words to be rather this that God left these inhabitants of the land unexpelled that the future generations might hereby be made carefull to train up their people in martiall discipline that so they might be the better able to perform what God had enjoyned them in not suffering any of the Canaanites to remain in the the land And this it is I conceive that in these words the holy Ghost doth chiefly aim at not so much their teaching the people the skill of the warre as their intention therein to wit that they might obey the Lords command in driving out the remainder of this people Vers 3. Namely five Lords of the Philistines c. Here the nations are reckoned that were not cast out of Canaan and the first mentioned are the five Lords of the Philistines to wit the Lords of Ashdod Gaza Askelon Gath and Ekron indeed three of these cities were at first taken by the men of Judah after the death of Joshua to wit Gaza Askelon and Ekron but it seems the Philistines soon recovered them again See chap. 1.18 Vers 5. And the children of Israel dwelt amongst the Canaanites c. from the eleventh verse of the foregoing chapter unto this place we have had a summary description of the state of Israel in the dayes of the Judges and here now the Authour of this story enters upon the particular story of Othniel the first of the Judges telling us in the first place what their sinnes were that brought them into that bondage out of which Othniel delivered them Vers 7. And served Baalim and the groves That is the idols which they set up and worshipped in the groves Vers 8. And he sold them into the hand of Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia See the note chap. 2.14 And the children of Israel served Cushan-rishathaim eight years It seems to me evident that for some years after the death of Joshua the people continued constant in the worship of the true God chap. 2.7 And the people served the Lord all the dayes of Joshua and all the dayes of the Elders that out-lived Joshua c. and doubtlesse some few years it was after they fell to idolatry ere God sold them into the hand of this king of Mesopotamia and therefore how long after the death of Joshua these eight years began of Israels bondage under the king of Mesopotamia we cannot say Vers 9. And when the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raised up a deliverer c. The word in the Hebrew signifieth a saviour but thereby is meant one that delivered them from the bondage they were in and this was Othniel who was the sonne of Calebs brother and withall his sonne in law as being married to Achsah his daughter chap. 1.13 for that noble exploit of his in taking Debir and this was the honour of the children of Judah that the first judge after Joshua was of their tribe the Lord therein making good that prophecy of Jacob Gen. 49.8 Judah thou art he whom thy Brethren shall praise thine hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies thy fathers children shall bow down before thee Many hold that Othniel became Judge of Israel immediately after the death of Joshua but me thinks it is clear in this place that it was not till towards the end of the eight years of Israels bondage under Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia for it is said that then the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord and thereupon God raised up Othniel to be a deliverer that is God did then by a speciall instinct of his Spirit stirre him up to make warre against this tyrant for the deliverance of his people and furnished him with all necessary gifts and graces of his Spirit both for the vanquishing of the enemie and for the government of the people which it seems upon this occasion he took upon him But yet if Othniel took Debir and thereupon married Calebs daughter whilst Joshua was yet living as many Expositours hold he did hereby we may probably gather that it was not many years after Joshuas death ere the Israelites were thus oppressed by this king and so thereupon Othniel was raised up of God to be their Judge Vers 10. And the Spirit of the Lord came upon him That is God by his Spirit did poure forth upon him an extraordinary measure of all gifts requisite
for the service he was to undertake and withall did secretly but mightily work upon his spirit in moving him to undertake that service for which he had fitted him Vers 11. And the land had rest fourty years That is unto the expiration of fourty years to wit from the death of Joshua It is a great question amongst Expositours whether the years wherein the Israelites are said in this book to have been in bondage under those nations that prevailed over them and the years wherein the Judges are here said to have judged Israel and wherein the land is said to have been in rest are to be accounted as severall distinct years or no and so it is in this particular place some holding that the land had rest fourty years under Othniels government after those eight years wherein the king of Mesopotamia had tyrannized over them and others holding that both the eight years of the bondage of Israel under Cushan-rishathaim and the foregoing years wherein the Israelites lived without a Judge under the joynt-government of their Elders and had not yet by their sinnes brought themselves into bondage are to be all comprehended under the fourty years here mentioned and indeed these last I conceive are in the right unquestionably as may be thus made evident It is expressely said that from the Israelites going out of Egypt to the building of the Temple in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne there were but four hundred and eighty years 1. Kings 6.1 And it came to passe in the foure hundred and fourscore yeare after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne c. that he began to build the house of the Lord. Now first if to the fourty years of the children of Israels wandring in the wildernesse and the seventeen years of Joshua we adde the severall years of Israels bondage mentioned in this book of Judges and secondly the years wherein the land is said to have rested and thirdly the severall years of the Judges from Abimelech to Eli and fourthly the years of Eli Samuel and David we must say then that there were well nigh six hundred years from the Israelites going out of Egypt to the building of the Temple in the fourth year of Solomons reigne yea though we allow no time of distance between the death of Joshua and the eight years of Cushan-rishathaims tyranny which would be absurd and this cannot stand with that place 1. Kings 6.1 Besides in one place of this book it is plain that the years of the Judges are confounded with those of the enemies oppressing the land namely chap. 15.20 where it is said of Samson that he judged Israel in the dayes of the Philistines twenty years and why therefore may it not be so with the other Judges too I make no question therefore but under the fourty years here mentioned And the land had rest fourty years we must comprehend both the eight years of Israels bondage under the king of Mesopotamia and all the years before that bondage of the Israelites even from the death of Joshua The main objection against this is how the land can be said to have rested fourty years if part of those fourty years it was wasted with war and the people held under a miserable bondage But to this I answer 1. That it is not unusuall in the Scripture to denominate a full number of years from that which is properly true onely of the greater part of that number as we see Gen. 35.26 where after the naming of the twelve sonnes of Jacob this clause is added These are the sonnes of Jacob that were born to him in Padan-Aram and yet Benjamin is mentioned amongst them who was not born in Padan-Aram but in the land of Canaan and so likewise Acts 7.14 where it is said that Joseph sent and called his father and all his kindred threescore and fifteen souls and yet indeed there went but threscore and tenne of them at that time into Egypt Gen. 46.27 and so again Exod. 12.40 where it said that the sojourning of the children of Israel who dwelt in Egypt was foure hundred and thirty years and yet they were not in Egypt above two hundred and fifteen years And 2. that the meaning of these words And the land had rest fourty years may be that the land had rest unto the end of fourty years to wit counting the fourty years from the death of Joshua to the death of Othniel and so indeed Junius translates these words usque ad quadragesimum annune unto the expiration of fourty years for so the like expression we find chap. 14.17 where it is said of Samsons wife that she wept before him the seven dayes while the feast lasted and yet the meaning is onely that she wept to the ending of those seven dayes to wit from the time he refused to tell her the meaning of his riddle Vers 12. And the Lord strengthened Eglon the King of Moab against Israel c. That is he gave him courage and strength to invade Israel and prospered his attempts against them whereas otherwise happely they would have been afraid to meddle with a people that had been so victorious Vers 13. And went and smote Israel and possessed the city of palm-trees That is Jericho Deut. 34.3 Jericho was indeed wholly burnt by the Israelites Josh 6.24 and was not rebuilt till Ahabs dayes 1. Kings 16.43 but the meaning therefore is that this Eglon King of Moab having vanquished the Israelites in battell possessed himself of the land and territory thereabouts where the city Jericho formerly stood and either built some strong fort there or possessed himself of some fort that might he there before and that to the end he might have the command of the foords of Jordan both because there was the passage over towards his own countrey the land of Moab and because by this means he should be the better able to keep the Israelites within Jordan and those without from joyning their forces together against him and hence it was that when Ehud began to raise the countrey against the Moabites after he had slain Eglon their king the first thing they did was to take the foords of Jordan vers 28. They went down after him and took the foords of Jordan towards Moab and suffered not a man to passe over Vers 14. So the children of Israel served Eglon King of Moab eighteen years How long it was after the death of Othniel ere these eighteen years of the Israelites bondage under Eglon began it is not expressed onely this is clear that first the Israelites revolted to idolatry after Othniels death and then the Lord brought Eglon against them for it However observable it is that whereas their first bondage under Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia continued but eight years ver 8. this next under Eglon continued eighteen years and so the next too after that under Jabin king of Canaan continued twenty years