and the first temptation presented to him Now all the power and army of Hell is let loose all the machinations of the bottomless pit put in practise against the second Adam but all to no purpose he stands like a rock unmoved in his righteousness and obedience and by such a death destroys him that had the power over death the Devil II. As the Dâ—â—â—l must be conquered so God must be satisfied And as Christs obedience did the one work so it did the other Obedience was the debt of Adam and mankind and by disobedience they had forfeited their Bonds Then comes this great Undertaker and will satisfie the debt with full interest yea and measure heaped and running over Does not the Apostle speak thus much Rom. V. from vers 12. forward particularly at vers 19. By the disobedience of one man many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Nor was this all that mans debt must be paid but Gods honour lay at stake too and that must be vindicated God had created man his noblest creature that he might glorifie and honour his Creator by his obedience Satan brings him to disobey his Creator and to obey him How might Satan here triumph and the honour of God lie in the dust I have mastered the chief Creation of God might Satan boast and made him that carried the badge and livery of his image now to carry mine I have frustrated the end and honour of the Creator and now all is mine own How sad a time were those three hours or thereabouts that passed betwixt the Fall of Adam and the promise of Christ Adam in darkness and not the least glimpse of promise or comfort Satan triumphing and poor manking and Gods honour trampled underfoot But then the Sun of righteousness arose in the promise that the seed of the woman should break the head of the Serpent And shall this uncircumcised Philistin thus deâ—ie the honour and armies of the living God saith Christ shall Satan thus carry the day against man and against God I will pay obedience that shall fully satisfie to the vindication of Gods honour to confound Satan and to the payment of mans debt to his reinstating and recovery And that was it that he paid consummatively in his Obedience to the death and in it and to the shedding of his blood Of which to speak in the full dimensions of the height depth length bredth of it what tongue can suffice what time can serve T is a Theme the glorified Saints deservedly sing of to all Eternity I shall speak in little of that which can never be extolled enough these two things only I. That he died merely out of obedience The Apostle tells us in Phil. II. 8. He became obedient to the death the death of the Cross. And what can ye name that brought him thither but Obedience Christs dead body imagine lies before you Call together a whole College of Phisitians to diffect it and to tell you what it was of which he died And their Verdict will be Of nothing but Love to man and Obedience to God For Principles of death he had none in his nature And the reason of his death lay not in any mortality of his body as it does in ourâ— but in the willingness of his mind Nor was his death his wages of sin as it is ours Rom. VI. ult but it was his choise and delight Luke XII 50. I have a baptism to be baptised withal and how am I straitned till it be accomplished Ask the first Adam why he sinned when he had no principles of sin in him and the true answer must be Because he would sin And so ask the second Adam why he died when he had no principles of death in him his answer must be to the like tenor He would lay down his life because he would be obedient to the death He came purposely into the World that he might dye Behold I tell you a mystery Christ came purposely into the World that he might dye and so never did Man but himself never will man do but himself True that every Man that comes into the World must dye but never Man came purposely that he might dye but only He. And he saith no less than that he did so Joh. XII 27. Father save me from this hour but for this cause came I to this hour And John XVIII 37. For this cause came I into this World to bear witness to the Truth Even to bear witness to the Truth to Death and Martyrdom II. Now add to all this the dignity of his Person who performed this Obedience that he was God as well as Man That as he offered himself according to his Manhood so he offered himself by the Eternal Spirit or as he was God as this Apostle saith Chap. IX 14. And now his obedience his holiness that he shewed in his death is infinite And what need we say more So that lay all the disobedience of all men in the World on an heap as the dead frogs in Egypt were laid on heaps that they made the land to stink again yet here is an Obedience that out-vies them all For though they be infinite in number as to mans numbring yet lay them all together they are finite upon this account because committed by creatures finite But here is an Obedience a holiness paid down by him that is infinite And now Satan where is thy Triumph Thou broughtest the first Adam to fail of perfect Obedience that he should have paid his Creator and here the second Adam hath paid him for it infinite Obedience And what hast thou now gained Therefore to take account from whence comes that infinite Virtue of Christs blood and death that the Scripture so much and so deservedly extols and magnifies Because as the Evangelist â—aith Out of his side came water and blood so out of his wounds came obedience and blood holiness and blood righteousness and blood and that obedience holiness righteousness infinite because he that paid it down and performed it was infinite And now judge whether it may not very properly be said That Christ was sanctified by his own blood As Aaron was sanctified for his Priesthood by his Unction and Garments Christ was consecrated fitted capacitated by his infinite obedience and righteousness which he shewed to the death and in it to be an High Priest able to save to the uttermost all those that come to him For first as in reference to himself it is said by this Apostle that he was raised from the dead by the blood of the Covenant Chap. XIII 20. And it was not possible but he should be raised for when he had performed such obedience and righteousness as in it was infinite in its validity subdued Satan in its alsufficiency satisfied the justice of God it was impossible that he should be held of death which is the wages of sin and disobedience And as he was thus raised by
them to be humbled some for their fathers guilt some for their own and some for both and to acknowledge that their being alive till now and their liberty to enter into the Land was a free and a great mercy for their own and their fathers faults might justly have caused it to have been otherwise with them 2. They had imitated their fathers rebellion to the utmost in their murmuring at Kadesh at their last coming up thither and in the matter of Baal Peor and therefore he might very well personate them by their fathers when their fathers faults were so legible and easie to be seen in them 4. He reckoneth not their second journy to Kadesh by name but slips by it Chap. 2. 1 4. Nor mentions their long wanderings for seven and thirty years together between Kadesh and Kadesh but only under this expression We compassed mount Seir many days Chap. 2. 1. because in that rehearsal he mainly insisteth but upon these two heads Gods decree against them that had first murmured at Kadesh and how that was made good upon them and Gods promise of bringing their children into the land and how that was made good upon them therefore when he hath largely related both the decree and the promise he hastens to shew the accomplishment of both 5. In rehearsing the Ten Commandments he proposeth a reason of the Sabbaths ordaining differing from that in Exodus there it was because God rested on the seventh day here it is because of their delivery out of Egypt and so here it respecteth the Jewish Sabbath more properly there the Sabbath in its pure morality and perpetuity And here is a figure of what is now come to pass in our Sabbath celebrated in memorial of Redemption as well as of Creation In the fifth Commandment in this his rehearsal there is an addition or two more then there is in it in Exod. 20. and the letter Teth is brought in twice which in the twentieth of Exodus was only wanting of all the letters 6. In Chap. 10. ver 6. 7 8. there is a strange and remarkable transposition and a matter that affordeth a double scruple 1. In that after the mention of the golden Calf in Chap. 9. and of the renewing of the Tables Chap. 10. which occurred in the first year after their coming out of Egypt he bringeth in their departing from Beeroth to Mosera where Aaron died which was in the fortieth year after now the reason of this is because he would shew Gods reconciliation to Aaron and his reconciliation to the people to Aaron in that though he had deserved death suddenly with the rest of the people that died for the sin of the golden Calf yet the Lord had mercy on him and spared him and he died not till forty years after and to the people because that for all that transgression yet the Lord brought them through that wilderness to a land of rivers of waters But 2. there is yet a greater doubt lies in these words then this for in Numb 33. the peoples march is set down to be from Moseroth to Bene Jahaan ver 31. and here it is said to be from Beeroth of Bene Jaahan to Moseroth there it is said Aaron died at mount Hor but here it is said He died at Moseroth now there were World 2553 Moses 120 Redemption from Egypt 40 seven several incampings between Moseroth and mount Hor Numb 33. 31 32 c. Now the answer to this must arise from this consideration that in those stations mentioned Numb 33. From Moseroth to Bene Jaahan to Horhagidgad c. they were marching towards Kadesh before their fortieth year and so they went from Moseroth to Bene Jaahan But in these stations Deut. 10. 6. they are marching from Kadish in their fortieth year by some of that way that they came thither and so they must now go from Bene Jaahan to Moseroth And 2. how Moseroth and mount Hor Gudgodah and Horhagidgad were but the * * * As Horeb and Sinai were though they be counted two several incampings of Israel Exod. 17. 1 6. and 19. 1. compared same place and Country and how though Israel were now going back from Kadish yet hit in the very same journies that they went in when they were coming thither as to Gudgodah or Horhagidgad to Jotbathah or Jotbath requires a discourse Geographical by it self which is the next thing that was promised in the Preface to the first part of the Harmony of the Evangelists and with some part of that work by Gods permission and his good hand upon the Work-man shall come forth 7. It cannot pass the Eye of him that readeth the Text in the Original but he must observe it how in Chap. 29. ver 29. the Holy Ghost hath pointed one clause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To us and to our Children belong the revealed things after an extraordinary and unparalleld manner to give warning against curiosity in prying into Gods secrets and that we should content our selves with his revealed will 8. Moses in blessing of the Tribes Chap. 33. nameth them not according to their seniority but in another order Reuben is set first though he had lost the birth-right to shew his repentance and that he died not * * * So the Chaldee renders ver 6. Let Reuben live and not die the second death the second death Simeon is omitted because of his cruelty to Sichem and Joseph and therefore he the fittest to be left out when there were twelve Tribes beside Judah is placed before Levi for the Kingdoms dignity above the Priest-hood Christ being promised a King of that Tribe Benjamin is set before Joseph for the dignity of Jerusalem above Samaria c. 9. The last Chapter of the Book was written by some other then Moses for it relateth his death and how he was buried by the Lord that is by Michael Jude 9. or Christ who was to bury Moses Ceremonies The Book of JOSHUA THIS Book containeth a history of the seventeen years of the rule of Joshua which though they be not expresly named by this sum in clear words yet are they to be collected to be so many from that gross sum of four hundred and eighty years from the delivery out of Egypt to the laying of the foundation of solomons Temple mentioned 1 Kings 6. 1. for the Scripture hath parcelled out that sum into these particulars forty years of the people in the wilderness two hundred ninety and nine years of the Judges forty years of Eli forty of Samuel and Saul forty of David and four of Solomon to the Temples founding in all four hundred sixty three and therefore the seventeen years that must make up the sum four hundred and eighty must needs be concluded to have been the time of the rule of Joshua CHAP. I. World 2554 Ioshua 1 JOSHUA of Joseph succeedeth Moses the seventh from Ephraim 1 Chron. 7. 25. and in him first appeared Josephs birth-right 1 Chron. 5. 1. and
〈◊〉 Zephaniah the second Priest Targum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Zephaniah the Sagan of the Priests Caiaphas therefore was the High-Priest and Annas the Sagan or Ruler of the Temple who for his independent dignity is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or High-Priest as well as Caiaphas and seems therefore to be named first because he was the others Father-in-law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 h h h h h h Chetub fol. 88. 2. fol. 105. 1. There was a dissention between Hanan and the Sons of the chief Priests c. It was in a judicial cause about a Wife requiring her dower c. Where the scruple is who should these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these Chief Priests be Whether the Fathers and heads of the Courses or the High-Priest only and the Sagan It was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i i i i i i Cap. 1. of the same Treatise hal 5. a Counsel of Priests which we have already spoken to at Matth. XXVI 3. Now the question is whether by the Sons of the chief Priests be meant the Sons of the Fathers of Courses or the Fathers of Courses themselves or the Sons of the High-Priest and the Sagan where the High-Priest in that Court was like 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Prince in the Sanhedrin and the Sagan 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father of the Sanhedrin k k k k k k Pesikta fol. 11. 4. Moses was made a Sagan to Aaron He put on his Garments and took them off viz. on the day of his Consecration And as he was his Sagan in life so he was in death too VERS V. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Every valley shall be filled THE Jews have a Tradition that some such thing was done by the cloud that led Israel in the Wilderness Instead of many instances take the Targumist upon Cant. II. 6. There was a cloud went before them three days journey 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to take down the hills and raise the valleyes It slew all fiery Serpents in the Wilderness and all Scorpions and found out for them a fit place to lodge in What the meaning of the Prophet in this passage was Christians well enough understand the Jews apply it to levelling and making the ways plain for Israel's return out of Captivity for this was the main thing they expected from the Messiah viz. to bring back the Captivity of Israel l l l l l l Beresh rabb fol. 110. 3. R. Chanan saith Israel shall have no need of the Doctrine of Messiah the King in time to come for it is said to him shall the Gentiles seek Isai. XI 10. but not Israel If so why then is Messiah to come and what is he to doe when he doth come He shall gather together the Captivity of Israel c. VERS VIII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of these stones to raise up Children unto Abraham WE do not say the Baptist played with the sound of those two words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Banaia and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Abanaia He does certainly with great scorn deride the vain confidence and glorying of that Nation amongst whom nothing was more ready and usual in their mouths than to boast that they were the Children of Abraham when he tells them that they were such Children of Abraham that God could raise as good as they from those very stones VERS XI 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that hath two Coats let him impart to him that hath none IT would be no sense to say he that hath two Coats let him give to him that hath not two but to him that hath none For it was esteemed for Religion by some to weare but one single Coat or Garment Of which more elsewhere VERS XIII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exact no more than that which is appointed you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 m m m m m m Sanhedr fol. 25. 2. When the Rabbins saw that the Publicans exacted too much they rejected them as not being fit to give their testimony in any case Where the Gloss hath it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 too much that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 More than that which is appointed them And the Father of R. Zeirah is commended in the same place that he gently and honestly executed that trust He discharged the Office of a Publican for thirteen years when the Prince of the City came and this Publican saw the Rabbins he was wont to say to them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Go my people enter thou into thy Chambers Isai. XXVI The Gloss is Lest the Prince of the City should see you and taking notice what numbers you are should encrease his tax yearly VERS XIV 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Neither accuse any falsly LEVIT XIX 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Neither lye one to another Job XXXV 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The oppressed See Psal. LXXII 4. CXIX 122. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. n n n n n n Dion Cass. lib. 58. a little from the beginning The manner of sycophants is first to load a person with reproaches and whisper some secret that the other hearing it may by telling something like it become obnoxious himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 With your wages A word used also by the Rabbins o o o o o o Midr. Schir fol. 5. 3. The King distributeh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wages to his Legions p p p p p p Sanhedr fol. 18. 2. The King is not admitted to the intercalation of the year 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of the Opsonia That is lest he should favour himself in laying out the years with respect to the Souldiers pay VERS XXII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Like a Dove IF you will believe the Jews there sate a golden Dove upon the top of Solomon's Scepter q q q q q q Bemidb. rabh fol. 250. 1. As Solomon sate in his throne his Scepter was hung up behind him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at the top of which there was a Dove and a golden crown in the mouth of it VERS XXIII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Being as was supposed the Son of Ioseph A Parable r r r r r r Schemoth rabba fol. 160. 4. There was a certain Orphaness brought by a certain 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epitropus or Foster-father an honest good man At length he would place her in Marriage A scribe is called to write a bill of her dower Saith he to the girl what is thy name N. saith she What the name of thy Father She held her peace To whom her Foster-father why dost thou not speak Because saith she I know no other Father but thee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that educateh the child is called a Father not he that begets it Note that Joseph having been taught by the Angel and well satisfied in
had seen the figure and pattern of a glorious Tabernacle so now in this second forty days fast he desireth to have a sight of the glory of God On the thirtieth day of the month A◠he goeth up again with the two Tables and beginneth another forty days fast and seeth the Lord and heareth him proclaim himself by most glorious attributes and receiveth some commands from him On the tenth day of the month Tisri he cometh down with the glad tydings that all is well betwixt God and Israel with the renewed Tables in his hand and with commission to set about making the Tabernacle CHAP. XXXV XXXVI XXXVII XXXVIII XXXIX XL. World 2515 Moses 82 Redemption from Egypt 2 AND so do Israel fall about that work which by the first day of the month Abib the first month of the next year is finished and it begun to be erected when it is set up the cloud of glory filleth it and God taketh up his seat upon the Ark in figure of his dwelling amongst men in Christ. The Book of LEVITICUS OUT of the Tabernacle newly erected God giveth ordinances for it and first concerning Sacrifice to represent Christs death as the Tabernacle it self did represent his body The whole time of the story of Leviticus is but one moneth namely the first month of the second year of their deliverance and not altogether so much neither for the very first beginning of the month was taken up in the erecting of the Tabernacle of which the story is in Exod. 40. CHAP. I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII RUles given for all manner of sacrifices This is the first Oracle given from off the Mercy-seat There is the letter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the very 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 first word of the Book 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 written less then all his fellows and it seemeth by such a writing to hint and intimate that though this were a glorious Oracle yet was it small in comparison of what was to come when God would speak to his people by his own Son whom the Ark Mercy-seat and Oracle did represent CHAP. VIII IX THE seven days of the consecration of Aaron and his sons follow after the time of the setting up of the Tabernacle and were not coincident or concurrent with that time as the Jews very generally but very groundlesly do apprehend as Seder Olam Tanchum ex R. Joseph Baal Turim Ab Ezra R. Sol and others For 1. this command for their consecration is given out of the Tabernacle now erected as well as the rules for sacrifice were And 2. they abide the seven days in the Tabernacle Chap. 8. 33. and the very first day of the seven the congregation were gathered to the door vers 3 4. which undeniably shew that it was finished and set up when these seven days of consecration began CHAP. X. THE death of Nadab and Abihu was on the very first day that the service of the Altar began namely on that eighth day after the seven of the consecration when Aaron and his sons offered sacrifices for themselves and the people This appeareth plainly by comparing the third and fifteenth Verses of the ninth Chapter with the sixteenth Verse of this tenth Chapter and thus the service of the Sanctuary by an accident began with Death and Judgment NUMBERS IX to Ver. 15. AFter the end of the tenth Chapter of Leviticus in the proper order of story are the first fourteen Verses of the ninth Chapter of Numbers to be taken in which treat concerning the Passover For the Tabernacle being reared on the very first day of the second year of their coming out of Egypt namely on the first day of Nisan these orders and rules concerning Sacrifices and the Priests consecration were given and the eight days of Priests consecration and Sacrifices were accomplished before the fourteenth day of that month came when the Passover was to be kept by an old command given the last year in Egypt and by a second command now given in the wilderness so that this order and method is clear Now the reason why this story of this second Passover is not only not laid in its proper place in this Book of Leviticus but also out of its proper place in the Book of Numbers for the Book beginneth its story with the beginning of the second month but this story of the Passover belongeth to the first month The reason I say of this dislocation is because Moses his chief aim in that place is to shew and relate the new dispensation or command for a Passover in the second month which was a matter of very great moment For the translation of that feast a month beyond its proper time did the rather inforce the significancy of things future then of things past as rather recording the death of Christ to come then their delivery from Egypt when it hit not on that very night This story therefore of the Passover transferred to the second month upon some occasions being the matter that Moses chiefly aimed at and respected in that relation and history he hath set it in his proper place for so is that where it lies in the Book of Numbers and intending and aiming at the mention of that he hath also brought in the mention of the right Passover or that of the first month as it was necessary he should to shew the occasion of the other LEVITICUS XI XII XIII XIV XV. AFter the rules for things clean and fit for sacrifice the Lord cometh to give rules for things clean and fit to eat and clean and fit to touch for this was the tripartite distinction of clean or unclean in the Law Every thing that was unclean to touch was unclean to eat but every thing that was unclean to eat was not unclean to touch every thing that was unclean to eat was unclean to sacrifice but every thing that was unclean to sacrifice was not unclean to eat for many things might be eaten which might not be sacrificed and many things might be touched which might not be eaten And under the Law about clean and unclean there is exceeding much of the doctrine of sin and renovation touched considerable in very many particulars 1. By the Law of Moses nothing was unclean to be touched while it was alive but only man A man in Leprosie unclean to be touched Lev. 13. and a woman in her separation Lev. 12. but Dogs Swine Worms c. not unclean to be touched till they be dead Lev. 11. 31. 2. By the Law of Moses uncleanness had several degrees and Leprosie was the greatest There was uncleanness for a day as by touching a dead beast for a week as by touching a dead man for a month as a woman after Child-birth and for a year or more as Leprosie 3. Every Priest had equal priviledge and calling to judge of the Leprosie as well as the the high Priest 4. The Priests that were judges of Leprosie could not be tainted
Sanctuary Eli 18 with a Sacrifice and a Song The year of his birth is not determinable Eli 19 Eli 20 no not so much as whether it were in the Judgeship of Eli though it be undoubted Eli 21 that it was in his Priest-hood Eli's sons commit theft and adultery in Eli 22 the very Sanctuary they ravin from the men that came to sacrifice and they Eli 23 ravish the women that * * * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 2. 22. Women that had some office and attendance at the Tabernacle As Num. 4. 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to do the Sanctuary service Anna was such a woman Luke 2. 37. waited on the Sanctuary and so they cause the Ordinances Eli 24 of the Lord to be abhorred Under such example is Samuel educated Eli 25 Eli 26 yet falleth not under that taint A Prophet sharply reproveth Eli for not reproving Eli 27 his sons This Prophet the Jews held to be Elkanah himself and say Eli 28 that he was one of the eight and forty Prophets that prophesied to Israel In Chap. Eli 29 2. Vers. 11. it is said that Elkanah returned to Ramoth to his own house and yet Eli 30 verse 20. it is said that Eli blessed Elkanah which is to be understood that Eli 31 he had done so from Samuels first dedication and so did as oft as he came to Eli 32 Shiloh Samuel himself becomes a Prophet first against Elies house and then Eli 33 afterward to all Israel Chap. 3. 1. Impiety had exceedingly banished Prophesie Eli 34 Eli 35 in these times amongst them but now the Lord begins to restore it for prediction Eli 36 of ruine and then for direction of reformation Urim and Thummim Eli 37 were ere long to be lost from the Priests with the loss of the Ark Eli 38 and God pours the Spirit of Prophesie upon a Levite to supply that Eli 39 want CHAP. IV. World 2909 Eli 40 THE Ark first touched and taken with the hands of uncircumcised ones The two sons of Eli come to fatal ends at this last service of the Ark as the two sons of Aaron Nadab and Abihu did at the first Eli himself dieth the very death of an unredeemed Ass Exod. 13. 13. Shiloh laid waste Jer. 7. 14. and the birthright lost from Joseph and Ephraim Psal. 78. 60. c. The Tabernacle had been at Shiloh 340 years and somewhat more The Idol of Dan hath now out-lived it Judg. 18. 31. Ah poor Israel World 2910 Eli 1 Here begin the forty years of Samuel and Saul mentioned Act. 13. 20 21. He gave them Judges after a manner four hundred and fifty years that is the years of the oppressors also reckoned in the Judges 299. the oppressors 111. and Eli 40. until Samuel the Prophet And afterward they desired a King and God gave them Saul by the space of forty years that is to the expiration of forty years from Elies death the last of the Judges CHAP. V. VI. THE Ark is all the spring and summer of this year in the land of the Philistims For its sake the Lord smiteth Dagon the god of their Corn and destroyeth the harvest of their Corn as it grew on the ground with an army of Mice He striketh the people with Emerods in their hinder parts Psal. 78. 66. and bringeth a shameful soreness on them in a contrary part and in a contrary nature to the honourable soreness of Circumcision They restore the Ark again with strange presents with abundance of golden Mice Et cum quinque anis vel podicibus aureis quasi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Two Kine knew their owner as Esa. 1. 3. Hophni and Phineas knew him not The Bethshemites though Priests yet slain by the Lord for too much boldness with the Ark. CHAP. VII Vers. 1. And the first half of the second Samuel 2 THE Ark setled in Kirjath-jearim the City of the woods to this the Samuel 3 Psalmist speaketh Psal. 132. 6. We heard of it at Ephratah or at Shiloh Samuel 4 in Ephraim we found it in the fields of the wood or at Kirjath-jearim there an Samuel 5 Eleazar looketh to it when both the line of Eleazar and Ithamar are out of Samuel 6 that service And it came to pass while the Ark abode in Kirjath-jearim the time Samuel 7 Samuel 8 was long for it was twenty years This is not to be understood for the whole Samuel 9 time that it was there for it was above six and forty years there before David Samuel 10 fetched it up 2 Sam. 6. namely thirty nine years of Samuel and Saul and Samuel 11 seven David born in the tenth year of Samuel years of Davids reign in Hebron but it is to be thus understood and construed Samuel 12 that the Ark was twenty years in Kirjath-jearim before the people of Israel Samuel 13 minded it or looked after it but they followed and adhered to their former Samuel 14 Idolatries and corruptions and therefore it is said by Samuel afterward vers 3. Samuel 15 Samuel 16 If you do return unto the Lord put away the strange gods Ashteroth from among Samuel 17 you c. Their Idolatry and prophaneness was so deep rooted having been so Samuel 18 long and so customary with them that neither the loss of the Ark nor the Samuel 19 slaughter of Israel had wrought upon them but that twenty years together Samuel 20 they are lost to the Ark though the Ark were not then lost to them CHAP. VII Vers. 2. The latter half of it * * * The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be translated not And but Then they lamented Then all the house of Israel lamented after the Lord and so to the end of the 7 Chapter and Chapter 8. all World 2930 Samuel 21 A Spirit of repentance and conversion cometh generally upon all the people a matter and a time as remarkable as almost any we read of in Scripture one only parallel to it and that is in Acts 2. and 3. at the great conversion there There were to that time these sums of years four hundred ninety years from hence to the beginning of the Captivity seventy years of the Captivity and four hundred ninety years from the end of the Captivity thither The seventy of the Captivity are the midst of years Hab. 3. 2. And Samuel according to this chain is the first of the Prophets Acts 4. 24. Samuel 22 Israel is baptized from their Idols Samuel though no Priest yet by special They drew water and poured it before the Lord Chap. 7. 6 To be understood of their washing themselves from their idols as Gen. 35. 2. Exod. 19. 14. Samuel 23 warrant sacrificeth by Prayer destroyeth the Philistims with thunder Chap. 2. Samuel 24 20. Psal. 99. 6. they were subdued in that very place where they had subdued Samuel 25 Israel and taken the Ark one and twenty years before Samuel rideth in circuit Samuel 26 and judgeth Israel Judah recovereth
same mind that Saul reigned but three years in all 1 Sam. 13. 1. and that the forty years mentioned at the breaking out of Absaloms rebellion 2 Sam. 15. 7. were to be reckoned from the time of Sauls first anointing or of Israels asking a King and so that that rebellion fell out in the seven and thirtieth year of the reign of David But now having a second time as seriously as I can viewed the times and finding so many things occurring betwixt the first anointing of Saul and the days of his death as are not imaginable to have been acted in three years especially it being said that David was one whole year and four months in the country of the Philistims after all his persecutions and before Sauls death 1 Sam. 27. 7. and it appearing also most probable according to the order as the Chapters themselves lye that the three years famine for the Gibeonites were after Davids restoring to his Kingdom again after Absaloms rebellion I cannot but upon these second thoughts retract my first and conceive of these times according as I have laid them now with these conceptions concerning them 1. That Davids numbring and setling the Officers of State and the Priests and Levites was in his fortieth year 1 Chron. 26. 31. 2. That this was begun presently upon the Lords designing the place of the Temple by fire from Heaven 1 Chron. 22. 1 2. which was in Davids thirty ninth 2 Sam. 24. 8. 3. That the year that David sinfully numbred the people was the very next year after the three years famine 2 Sam. 24. 13. 4. That the first of these three years famine was the year that next followed the year of Absaloms rebellion 5. That the year of that rebellion was forty years after Davids first anointing in Bethlehem 6. That Saul reigned but three years before that anointing of David And though he lived five years after yet are not those years reputed of his reign for now the Lord had cast him off and he acted not now the part of a King but a Persecutor 1 KING II. from ver 12. to ver 39. World 2990 Solomon 1 SOLOMON reigned Adonijah slain for desiring his fathers wife Abiathar of the line of Ithamar put from the High Priesthood Joabs blood shed at the Altar Benaiah a Priest the Executioner and made General of the Army Shimei is confirmed This year Solomon begetteth Rehoboam of a Lady of Ammon see 1 King 14. 21. c. 2 CHRON. I. to vers 14. 1 KING 3. from ver 3. to the end THE Story of the death of Shimei is anticipated and joyned to the Story of his confinement though it were three years after that the Relation might have done with Shimei at once So also is the Story of Solomons marrying Pharaohs daughter laid sooner then its Chronical time for it was not before Solomons going to Gibeon and there begging wisdom but it was after But the reason of the placing of it before is given by the Jews to be because he married not Pharaohs daughter before he had slain Shimei and therefore the Stories of them are so laid together But upon viewing well the scope of the Stories preceeding about the death of Joab and the exclusion of Abishai from the Priesthood c. the reason of joyning Solomons marriage with Pharaohs daughter will easily appear namely because the Text would lay the politick ways of Solomon for the establishing of his Kingdom close together and those were these two The taking away those that might disquiet it at home and by making league and affinity with powerful Princes abroad And then it cometh to tell the sure and divine way how to make it sure and that it also expresseth to be two namely loving the Lord and begging wisdom of him At Gibeon was the greatest Synagogue in the Land for there stood the Tabernacle and the brazen Altar that Moses had made being brought thither as to the chief residence of the sons of Ithamar who waited on the Sanctuary when Shiloh fell There Solomon asketh wisdom of the Lord and obtaineth it And coming to Jerusalem he sheweth it in determining the doubtful case between the two Harlots He was now but twelve years old 1 KING XI ver 21 22. THE very reading of ver 21. doth plainly shew that it is proper to take in this Story of Hadads returning to his own Country here CHAP. IV V. 2 CHRON. I. vers 14 15 16 17. And II. all Solomon 2 THE matter of the fourth Chapter of Kings and the conclusion of Solomon 3 1 Chron. 1. is not of a fixed and determinate date tied to any one year but it runneth through the story of many years for it sheweth the growth and continuance of Solomons strength establishment and prosperity in his Kingdom and the evidencing of his wisdom all his time till his declining to Idolatry And therefore as for the method and place of it it might be laid even any where in the Story of all that time this construction being made of it wheresoever it is laid But the Holy Ghost hath laid it in the beginning of his History that that general matter concerning his power and prosperity might be concluded before the relation come to speak of particular actions It is no doubt but the transfaction of business betwixt Solomon and Hiram King of Tyre was very early in Solomons reign because he would not loose time towards the building of the Temple But the Text would dispatch the other before as a general thing that particular Stories might be fallen upon and receive no interruption Hiram or Hirom or Hâ—ram King of Tyre for all these ways his name is written confesseth God the Creator 2 Chron. 2. 12. maketh a Covenant with Solomon supplieth him with necessaries for his building and sendeth him a choice workman Hiram This Hirams father was of the Tribe of Naphtali 1 King 7. 14. but said to be a Tyrian because he dwelt there as Obed-Edom a Levite is said to be a Gittite his mother was of the Tribe of Dan 2 Chron. 2. 14. the place of Idolatry Solomon setteth one hundred fifty three thousand six hundred Proselites to frame materials for the Temple seventy thousand to bear burdens eighty thousand to be hewers in the mountains and three thousand six hundred overseers 2 Chron. 2. 18. that is three thousand three hundred overseers of the one hundred and fifty thousand Workmen 1 King 5. 16. and three hundred overseers of them and all The Princes of Solomon at home and his chief Officers for his houshold provision reckoned 1 King 4. Azariah the Son of Zadok ver 2. that is the Son of Ahimaaz the Son of Zadok 1 Chron. 6. 8 9. is chief of the Sanhedrin Zadok and Abiathar are Priests ver 4. though Abiathar was expelled by Solomon from the High Priesthood Chap. 2. 26. Yet might he exercise the Function of a Priest at Gibeon till the Temple was built There were twelve Officers for the twelve
One once staid long and they were about to go in after him Some say it was Simeon the Just. They said to him Why didst thou stay so long He answered I was praying for the Sanctuary of your God that it should not be destroyed They say to him Though thou didest so yet shouldest not thou have stayed so long If this Relation carry any truth with it it might be looked upon as the expiring of Vision as Prophesie had also ceased not long before that time for Simeon the Just is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the remnant of the men of Ezra ' s great Synagogue Aboth R. Nathan cap. 4. and upon the death of Zachary and Malachy who were of that Synagogue the spirit of Prophesie departed And here Vision and Prophesie is dawning again Zacharias for not believing the words of the Angel is struck 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deaf and Dumb and doth fore-signifie the silencing of the Levitical Priesthood e're long to be In the Jews Canons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is one of the five sorts of Persons that they commonly exclude from all imployments and matters of honour trust or import and it means 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that can neither hear nor speak Jerus in chagigah fol. 75. col 4. His Wife Elizabeth conceiving with child retires as a recluse for five months space that she might keep her self from all desilement she carrying as choice a Nazarite in her Womb as she did ver 1. 5. Five months were not the whole time of her retiring for that that urged her to keep close so long had the same tie upon her all the time she went with child but five months are only named by way of introduction to the story and occurrence in the sixth month mentioned instantly after In the sixth month the same Angel appeareth to the Virgin Mary and telleth her of the Birth of the Messios to be of her which she believing though by the course of Nature so impossible she presently goeth to her Cousin Elizabeth into the Hill-countrey of Judea to Hebron see Josh. 21. 11. not only to visit her and to rejoyce with her nor only to see the proof of those things that the Angel had told of her but very probably acted by the Holy Ghost that she might conceive the Messias in Hebron where so many choice and eminent Types of him and references to him had been in ancient time These Tidings come to the Virgin at the very latter end of the year that we are upon or the beginning of the next and her Journey to Hebron is in the middle of Winter SECTION IV. MATTHEW Chap. I. All the Chapter CHRIST'S Genealogy by the Line of Solomon and by his supposed Father Joseph His Mother in danger to be divorced upon false suspition of Adultery WHether it were that Mary conceived with child at the instant of the Angels telling her of her Conception as hath been held most generally or at the instant that she came to her Cousin Elizabeth in Hebron by the time that she had stayed with her three months she might easily be discovered to be with child as Tamar was after the same space of time Gen. 38. 24. Whose case and danger of death in that story compare with the Virgins case and danger of divorce in this The Talmudick Decretals do allot three months for such a discovery Every woman say they that is divorced or become a widow behold she may not be married nor espoused till she have stayed 90 days that it may be known whether she be with child or no and that there may be distinguishing betwixt the Seed of the first Husband and the Seed of the second Likewise a stranger and his Wife which are Proselytes they keep them asunder 90 days that there may be a discerning between the Seed sown in holiness that is when they are come into the true Religion out of Heathenism Compare 1 Cor. 7. 14. and the Seed not sown in holiness Talm. in Jebamoth cap. 4. in Chetuboth cap. 5. Maym. in Gerushin cap. 11. This space of time considered in the present story it sheweth how fitly the last Verse of the preceding Section viz. Luke 1. 56. and the 18th Verse of this do joyn together The Genealogy interposed doth not interrupt but illustrate the story intended And it is not only properly but even necessarily set in the Front of the Evangelical History that satisfaction might be given by it in that main Point concerning Christ which the Scriptures do so often inculcate and which the Jews would first of all look after namely to prove Jesus of Nazareth how ever so meanly born yet to be The Son of David There were two remarkable Maxims among the Jewish Nation 1. That there was to be no King of Israel but of the House of David and Line of Solomon Talm. in Sanhedr cap. 10. And consequently they looked for King Messias from that Line 2. That the Family of the Mother is not called a Family Juchasin fol 55. Hereupon hath Matthew most pertinently brought this Pedigree through the House of Solomon and ended it in Joseph a Male whom the Jews looked upon as the Father of Jesus The last Verse of this Chapter as it referreth to the demeanour of Joseph and Mary in their mutual society till the Birth of Christ lyeth properly in the Harmonizing of the Evangelists in the place where it doth But as it referreth to the Birth of Christ it is coincident with Luke 2. 7. The Reader in his thoughts will place it as he seeth cause in these several Relations SECTION V. LUKE Chap. I. from Ver. 57. to the end John Baptist born WHen Maries three months stay with her Cousin Elizabeth was expired it is easily guessed that if Elizabeth by that time were not delivered of her child yet she was very near it and that consideration doth clear the subsequence of this Section to the preceding John Baptist born in Hebron the place of the residence of Abraham and of the first Royalty of David Here Circumcision was first ordained and here is he born that was to bring in Baptism instead of Circumcision The Priests at the Temple as they looked for break of day used oft to say The face of all the Skie is bright even unto Hebron Talm. in Joma cap. 3. in Tamid cap. 3. Compare the dawning of the Gospel now rising there in the Birth of the Baptist and compare the words of Zacharias a Priest ver 78. The time of the Baptists Birth will be found by setting that Clock from our Saviours to have been in the Spring much about the time of the Passeover about which time of the year Isaac was born SECTION VI. LUKE Chap. II. from Ver. 1. to Ver. 40. World 3928 Rome 754 Augustus 31 Herod 35 CHRIST Born LUKE maketh the coherence clear when he interposeth nothing betwixt the Birth of the Baptist and the Birth of Christ and indeed there is nothing
no small induction to him of the writing of this Epistle and sheweth the desperate danger of it Chap. 6. 4 5 c. and Chap. 10. 26 27 c. In which his touching of it we may see how far some had gone in the Gospel and yet so miserably far fallen from it as that some of them had had the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost and yet now sinned willingly and wilfully against it In describing their guilt one of his passages that he useth is but harshly applied by some Chap. 10. 29. Hath trodden under foot the Son of God and hath counted the blood of the Covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing when they say that this horrid Apostate wretch that treads Christ under foot was once sanctified by the blood of Christ whereas the words mean Christs being sanctified by the blood of the Covenant according to the same sense that Christ is said to be brought again from the dead by the blood of the Covenant in this same Epistle Chap. 13. 20. And the Apostle doth set forth the horrid impiety of accounting the blood of the Covenant a common thing by this because even the Son of God himself was sanctified by it or set apart as Mediator And so should I understand the words He hath trodden under-foot that Son of God and counted the blood of the Covenant by which he the Son of God was sanctified an unholy thing He magnifieth faith against those works that they stood upon and sought to be justified by and sheweth that this was the all in all with all the holy men both before the Law and under it When he gives them caution Lest there be any fornicator or profane person as Esau c. Chap. 12. 16. he doth not only speak according to the common tenet of the Nation that Esau was a fornicator as see Targ. Jerus in Gen. 25. but he seemeth to have his eye upon the Nicolaitan doctrine that was now rise that taught fornication to which he seemeth also to refer in those words Chap. 13. 4. Marriage is honourable c. And now henceforward you have no more story of this Apostle what became of him after the writing of this Epistle it is impossible to find out by any light that the Scripture holdeth out in this matter The two last verses but one of this Epistle trace him as far forward as we can any way else see him and that is but a little way neither Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty with whom if he come shortly I will see you By which words these things may be conjectured 1. That after his inlargement out of bonds he left Rome and preached in Italy He mentioneth in his Epistle to the Romans his desire and intent to go preach in Spain Rom. 15. 24. but that was so long ago that he had now found some just cause so much time intervening to steer his course another way For 2. It appears that when he wrote this Epistle to the Hebrews he intended very shortly to set for Judea if so be he sent the Epistle to the Jews of Judea as hath been shewed most probable he did So that trace him in his intentions and hopes and you find him purposing to go to Philippi Phil. 2. 23 24. Nay yet further to Colosse Philem. ver 22. Nay yet further into Judea It is like that the Apostacy and wavering that he heard of in the Eastern Churches shewed him more need to hasten thither then to go westward 3. He waited a little to see whether Timothy now inlarged would come to him in that place of Italy where he now was which if he did he intended to bring him along with him but whether they met and travelled together or what further became of either of them we shall not go about to trace lest seeking after them we lose our selves CHRIST LXIII NERO. IX IT hath been observed before how probable it is that Albinus came into the Government of Judea in Festus room in this ninth year of Nero. And if so then was James the Apostle who was called James the less martyred this year Josephus gives the story of this Antiq. lib. 20. cap. 8. Caesar saith he understanding the death of Festus sendeth Albinus governour into Iudea And the King Agrippa put Ioseph from the high-High-priesthood and conferred it upon Ananus the son of Ananus Now this Ananus junior was extreme bold and daring and he was of the sect of the Saduces which in judging are most cruel of any of the Iews Ananus therefore being such a one and thinking he had got a sit opportunity because Festus was dead and Albinus was not yet come he gets together a Council and bringing before it Iames the brother of Iesus who was called Christ and some others as transgressors he delivered them up to be stoned But those in the City that were more moderate and best skilled in the Laws took this ill and sent to the King privately beseeching him to charge Ananus that he should do so no more And some of them met Albinus as he came from Alexandria and shewed him how it was not lawful for Ananus to call a Council without his consent Whereupon he writeth a threatning Letter to Ananus And King Agrippa for this fact put him from the Highpriesthood when he had held it but three months and placed Iesus the son of Damneas in his room THE EPISTLE OF JAMES Although therefore the certain time of his writing this Epistle cannot be discovered yet since he died in the year that we are upon we may not unproperly look upon it as written not very long before his death And that the rather because by an expression or two he intimates the vengeance of Jerusalem drawing very near Chap. 5. 8 9. The coming of the Lord draweth nigh and Behold the Judge standeth before the door He being the Apostle residentiary of the Circumcision in Judea could not but of all others be chiefly in the eyes of those that maliced the Gospel there and the Ministers of it So it could not but be in his eye to observe those tokens growing on apace that his Master had spoken of as the forerunners and forewarners of that destruction coming False Prophets Iniquity abounding Love waxing cold betraying and undoing one another that he could not but very surely conclude that the Judge and judgment was not far from the door Among other things that our Saviour foretelleth should precede that destruction this was one Matth. 24. 14. This Gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all Nations and then shall the end come And so did the Gospel reach all the twelve Tribes as well as other Nations even the ten Tribes as well as the other two Therefore James a Minister of the Circumcision doth properly direct this Epistle to all the twelve Tribes scattered abroad The whole Nation was at this time some at the
his seed to Molech or useth Sorcery or profaneth the Sabbath or eateth holy things in his uncleanness or that cometh into the Sanctuary he being unclean or that eateth fat or blood or what is left of the sacrifice or any sacrificed thing not offered in season or that killeth or offereth up a sacrifice out of the Court or that eateth leaven at the Passover or that eateth ought on the day of Expiation or doth any work on it or that makes oil or incense like the holy or that anoints with holy oil that delayeth the Passover or Circumcision for which there are affirmative precepts All these if done wilfully are liable to cutting off and if done ignorantly then to the fixed sin-offering and if it be unknown whether he did it or no then to a suspensive trespass-offering but only he that defiles the Sanctuary and its holy things for he is bound to an ascending or descending offering Now that we may the better understand what Death by the hand of Heaven and Cutting off mean we are first to take notice that neither of them was any penalty inflicted by the hand or sentence of man but both of them do import a liableness to the wrath and vengeance of the Lord in their several kinds And the Jews do ever account Cutting off to be the higher and more eminent degree of Divine vengeance As to spare more evidences of this which might be given copiously this passage of Maymonides is sufficient and it is remarkable when he saith f f f Maym. in Biath Mikdash per. 4. Is it possible for a Priest that serveth in his uncleanness to stay so little in the Court 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 As that he should be guilty of death by the hand of Heaven only and not guilty of cutting off He had had those words but a little before which were cited even now An unclean person that serveth in the Sanctuary profaneth his Service and is guilty of death by the hand of Heaven although he stay not there and then he comes on and is it possible saith he that he should stay so little as to be guilty only of death by the hand of Heaven and not to be guilty of cutting off Apparently shewing that cutting off was the deeper degree and die of guilt and vengeance by the hand of God and Divine indignation By Death by the hand of Heaven in their sense therefore is to be apprehended some such a sodain avengeful stroke as the Lord shewed upon Nadab and Abihu or Ananias and Saphira to take them away And this may the better be collected by two passages usual in the Rabbins about this matter First In that they give up the offence of the Priests drinking wine before they went to serve which is held to have been the offence of Nadab and Abihu g g g â—â—â— per. 1. to death by the hand of Heaven which argues that they mean such a kind of stroke as they two had And secondly In that wheresoever the Law enjoyneth Aaron and his sons and the people about the affairs of the Sanctuary they shall or they shall not do thus or thus lest they die they interpret this of death by the hand of Heaven But what to understand by Cutting off is not so readily agreed among them h h h Kimchi in Esay â—8 Kimchi alledgeth it as the opinion of their Doctors That Dying before fifty years old is death by cutting off Compare Joh. 8. 57. i i i R. Sol. in Gâ—â— 17. Rabbi Solomon saith It is to die childless and to die before his time Baal Aruch giveth this distinction between Cutting off and Death by the hand of Heaven that k k k Arâ—â—h in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cutting off is of himself and of his children but Death by the hand of Heaven is of himself but not of his children But mean it which of these you will or all these together or which may have good probability to conceive a liableness to cutting off from the life of the world to come both this and Death by the Hand of Heaven were held by that Nation with whom the phrases were so much in use to mean not any censure or punishment inflicted by man but an impending vengeance of God and a continual danger and possibility when indignation should seize upon him that was faln under these gilts Anathema Maran Atha one under a curse whensoever the Lord shall come to inflict it as Joh. 3. 18 36. SECT III. Penalties inflicted upon unclean persons found in the Temple Whipping and the Rebels beating IT was not a small awe that this might work in the hearts of the people towards their restraining from going into the Sanctuary in their uncleanness to have this impressed and inculcated upon them as it was continually that such a venture did hazard them both body and soul and brought them ipso facto into Gods dreadful displeasure and into undoubted danger of accrewing judgment But did they let the offender thus alone that had offended as if he was fallen under the guilt of death by the Hand of Heaven or under the guilt of cutting off that they had no more to do with him but leave him to the justice of God and to judgment when it should fall upon him Many a wretch would make sleight of this matter and because sentence upon his evil work was not executed speedily his heart would be fully set in him to do so again as Eccles. 8. 11. Therefore they let not the Delinquent so escape but as he had fallen under the wrath of God so they also brought him under a penalty by the hand of man And this penalty was twofold either 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whipping by the appointment of the Judges or mawling and beating by the people 1. There was the penalty of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whipping or scourging upon the censure of the Judges according to the Law Deut. 25. 2. Where he was to receive forty stripes but their Tradition brought it to forty save one 2 Cor. 11. 24. And the reason of this was because they would make a hedge to the Law and whereas that commands that they should not give to a Delinquent that was whipt above forty stripes lest their brother should seem vile unto them they abated one of forty to make sure to keep within compass The measure and manner of their whipping is largely described in the Treatise Maccoth thus in their own words a a a Maccoth per. 3. How many stripes do they give him saith the Mishueh there Why forty lacking one As it is said by a certain number forty stripes that is a number near to forty Rabbi Judah saith he is beaten with full forty and where hath he the odd one above thirty nine Between his shoulders They allot him not stripes but so as they might be triplicated They allot him to receive forty he hath had some of them
are girded with strength And so doth the Targum on the Canticles apply the seventh verse of the sixth Chapter of that Book to the same House As a piece of a Pomegranate are thy Temples The Kingdom saith it of the Asmonaean Family was full of Judgments as a Pomegranate c. Not to be inquisitive after the derivation of the word which we find in Psal. 68. 32. and which is generally interpreted by the Jews to signite great Dukes and Princes Mattathias not living long after his first appearing a Champion for his distressed Country he left the charge of that War and Expedition to his sons after him amongst whom 17. JUDAS surnamed Maccabaeus from these four Acrostick Letters in his Ensign Ioseph Antiq. l. 12. c. 9 10 c. 1 Mac. 3. 4 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which meant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exod. 15. 12. Lord who is like thee among the mighty undertook the quarrel of his People and of the Law Religion and Covenant and did very victoriously but at last was slain In these times when all things were in a combustion and confusion in the Land and in Ioseph ubi sup c. 15 16 17. 1 Mac. 7. 12. 13 14 c. 9. 1. 5 55. 1 Mac. 9. 10. 11. 2â— Iosep. Ant. â— 13. ad c. 11. Religion one ALCIMUS bare the name of High-priest being indeed of that Line but a man for mischief and impiety more like a Heathen than a High-priest of Israel doing much evil whilst he lived and coming at last to a most fearful end 18. JONATHAN succeedeth his brother Judas as chief Commander he was made High-priest by Alexander the son of Antiochus and confirmed therein by Antiochus the son of Alexander doth many valiant acts and at last is slain by Trypho 19. SIMON his brother succeedeth him valiant also and advantagious to his people 1 Mac. 14. 15. 16. Ioseph ubi sup c. 11 12 13. like his brethren but slain at last treacherously by his own son in Law 20. JOHN called also Hyrcanus or Hyrcanus Jannai He sacked Samaria destroyed Ioseph ubi sup cap. 18. Iuchasin â—ol 14 the Temple at Gerizim slew many of the wise men at Jerusalem was High-priest eighty years and turned Sadducee 21. ARISTOBULUS his son He first took upon him to be King Ioseph ib. c. 9. 22. ALEXANDER He bare also the name of King made many Wars and at Ibid. c. 22 23. last died of a Quartan Ague which had held him three years 23. HYRCANUS his son is made High-priest but his mother Alexandra by the Ibid. c. 24. support of the Pharisees sways the Kingdom 24. ARISTOBULUS younger brother to Hyrcanus after the death of their Lib. 14. c. 4 5 6. mother Alexandra maketh War upon his brother drives him from his Kingdom to a private life and takes both Kingdom and high-High-priesthood upon himself They both desire help and assistance from the Romans Scaurus and Pompey Aristobulus provoking Pompey by some dalliance causeth the sacking of Jerusalem and the subjecting of the Jews to the Roman yoke from under which they were never delivered Pompey restoreth the High-priesthood to Hyrcanus and carries Aristobulus and his son Antigonus prisoners to Rome and his two daughters 25. ALEXANDER the son of Aristobulus escaped the hands of Pompey when he Ibid. c. 10. captived his father and his brother to Rome and he in Judea raised divers stirs and tumults and affecting the Kingdom is twice suppressed by the Roman Gabinius 26. ANTIGONUS Aristobulus his other son escaping from Rome into Judea first Ib. c. 21. 25. by the help of the King of Tyrus and after by the help of the Parthians busleth for the High-priesthood and power out of the hands of Hyrcanus getteth Hyrcanus prisoner causeth his ear to be cut off and by that blemish or maim he maketh him uncapable of the Priesthood But as Hyrcanus lost his ears so at last Antigonus lost his head by the ax of Lib. 15. c. 1. Dion Cas. l. 49. Antony at Antioch having been first crucified and whipt 27. ANANELUS an inferiour Priest sent for out of Babylon is made High-priest Iosd 15. c. 2. by Herod Here Alexandra the daughter of Hyrcanus and wife of Alexander the son of Aristobulus took indignity and so did Mariam Herods wife who was Alexandra's daughter that an inferiour person should be preferred to the High-priesthood and Aristobulus Mariams brother and Alexandra's son be passed by These womens shifts and importunities Ibid. c. 2. obtain the High-priesthood for Aristobulus and the deposition of Ananelus 28. ARISTOBULUS a young man of a rare beauty is made High-priest being Ibid. c. 3. not much above fifteen years old after a years injoyment of it or little more he is drowned by Herods policy as he was swimming And then Ananelus becomes High-priest again 29. JESUS the son of Favens him Herod removed again Ibid c. 12. 30. SIMON the son of Boethus he was but a Priest before But Herod marrying Ibid. his daughter a woman of a rare beauty he made him High-priest 31. MATTHIAS the son of Theophilus Herod deposed his father in law Simon Lib. 17. c. 6. from the High-priesthood because he thought both he and his daughter Herods wife were privy to the counsels of his son Antipater 32. JOZARUS the son of Simon Herods brother in law Matthias being deposed Ibid. c. 8. by Herod 33. ELEAZAR made High-priest by King Archelaus Jozarus being deposed Ibid. c. 15. 34. JESUS the son of Sie shoulders Eleazar out Ibid. 35. JOZARUS again He was now in the place when Judea was taxed under Cyrenius Lib. 18. â— 1. Luke 2. at the birth of Christ and when the people were ready to rebel rather than be taxed he overcame them with perswasions 36. ANANUS upon the removal of Jozarus made High-priest by Cyrenius Ibid. c. 3. 37. ISMAEL promoted by Valerius Gratus upon Ananus his removal 38. ELEAZAR the son of Ananus promoted by the same Gratus upon Ismaels removal Ibid. he injoyed the High-priesthood but one year 39. SIMON the son of Kamith advanced by the same Gratus The Jerusalem Talmud calls him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and relates this story of him that on the Eve of the day of Expiation he went out to speak with the King and some spittle fell upon his garments and defiled him therefore Judah his brother went in on the day of Expiation and served in his stead and so their Mother Kamith saw two of her sons High-priests in one day She had seven sons and they all served in the High-priesthood hence came up this Proverb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 All meal is meal but Kamiths meal is fine flower In Joma per. 1. 40. CAIAPHAS who was also called Joseph He was Gratus his creature too Ibid. and all these changes were made by Gratus in eleven years and now are
see the full setling of the Law in their houses And when God had fetched him a people out of Egypt and laid the foundation of a glorious Church with signs and wonders then he thought it fit for their restriction as also ‖ ‖ ‖ Vid. Jarchi on Ruth cap. 1. for their distinction from the Heathen to give the Law from his own mouth the more to procure reverence to him For Heaven and Earth must needs hearken when the Lord speaketh Isa. 1. 2. And thus did †††Numa Minos c. the Heathen fain they received their Laws from a Deity that was never seen and yet their Laws were the better observed for that reason CHAP. LIX Of the place where it was given and manner GOD gave the Law in Arabia so wicked Mahomet gave his Law in Arabia A worse and a better thing no one Country every afforded God gave his Law in Sinai a bushy place as it seems by * * * Seneh signifies a bush Exodus 3. the name agreeable to the giving of so perplexing a matter Carry along with thee gentle Reader as thou readest the Scripture thus much care at my request as to mark that the Law of Moses was given in two places Sinai and the Tabernacle as also to consider that some part of this Law did only concern the Jews and some part did also concern all the World The Ceremonial Law that concerned only the Jews it was given to Moses in private in * * * Levit. 1. the Tabernacle and fell with the Tabernacle when the veil rent in twain The Moral Law concerns the whole World and it was given in sight of the whole World on the top of a mountain and must endure as long as any mountain standeth The Judicial Law which is more indifferent and may stand or fall as seems best for the good of a Common-wealth was given neither so publick as the one nor so private as the other but in a mean between both The Law on Sinai was with fire and trumpets so shall Christ come with fire and trumpet at the latter day to take an account how men have kept this fiery Law as it is called Deut. 33. 2. Fiery because given out of the fire as the Jerusalem and Babilonian Targums hold though I think there is more meant by the words than so for it is Eshdath which may be rendred the fire of a Law CHAP. LX. Of the effects of the Law THE letter of the Law is death but the Spirit giveth life The Jews stand upon the letter and think to gain life by the works of it but them the Apostle frequently Vid. Hillar Hieron in loc confuteth And I take the aim of Christs Parable Matth. 20. about the penny to extend to no less Some came into the Vineyard at the Dawning of the Day or the Age before the Flood and some at the third hour or in the time before the Law and some at the sixth and ninth hour or under the heat and burden of the Jewish Law and some at the last under the Gospel Those under the Law plead for merit we have born the heat and burden of the day that is costly Sacrifices sore Ceremonies c. To whom the Master answers that his penny is his own and if he give it it is not for their merit but his good will St. Paul calls the Law a School-Master and so it is indeed and such a School-Master as that that Livy and Florus speak of in Italy who brought forth his children that were trusted with him to Hannibal who if he had not been more merciful than otherwise they had all perished So they that rely upon the works of the Law are in fine constrained by the Law to come to Christ who more merciful than the Law does deliver them And if you well weigh it you shall find that as the whole Law so every part from one to another brings us to Christ. The Moral Law shews us what we should do and with the same sight we find that we cannot do it This makes us to seek to the Ceremonial for some Sacrifice or Ceremony to answer for our not doing it There we see that burning a dead beast is but poor satisfaction for the sins of men living and that outward purifyings of mens selves can avail but little to the cleansing of a soiled soul this then delivers us to the Judicial Law and by it we see what we deserve and thus in fine we are constrained to seek to Christ * * * It was Jesus or Josuah and not Moses or the Law that brought Israel into the Land of Canaan Jesus for there is no other name whereby we must be saved The Parable that our Saviour propounds in the tenth of Luke I think tends somethink to this purpose A man saith he went from Jerusalem to Jericho and fell among theeves and they robbed him of his raiment and wounded him and departed leaving him half dead A certain Priest came that way and when he saw him he turned aside A Levite came that way and when he saw him he passed by on the other side But a good Samaritan came as the Text imports and pitied him and salved him and lodged him and paid for him Such a one is man fallen among Satan Sin and Death and by them stopt stript and striped Satan dismounts him off his Innocency that should sustain him Sin strips him of all Righteousness that should array him Death strikes him with guiltiness and wounds him Here is a man in a woful case and none to aid him By comes a Priest that is first come the Sacrifices of the legal Priesthood and they may pass by him but they do not nor they cannot help him By comes a Levite that is the Ceremonies of the Levitical Law and they may pass by him but they do not they cannot help him Or by comes a Priest that is the Angels may see him thus but they let him lie for they cannot help him By comes a Levite that is Men and the World may see him thus but they let him alone for ever for they cannot succour him But by comes a good Samaritan that is our Saviour himself who is called a Samaritan and is said to have a Devil and he pities him salves him lodges him and pays for him He pities him in very bowels therefore he says as I live I would not the death of a sinner He salves him with his own blood therefore t is said By his stripes we are healed He lodges him in his own Church therefore the Church saith He brought me in the winecellar and love was his banner over me And he pays for him what he deserved therefore he saith I have troad the Winepress alone It is said in the Book of Kings that when the Shunamites dead child was to be raised Elisha first sent his staff to be laid upon him but that did no good but when Elisha
doors The time of the abode of the Tabernacle at Shiloh Ephrata or in the Tribe of Ephraim Psal. CXXXII 6. was from the seventh year of the rule of Joshua to the death of Eli three hundred forty and nine years in which time occurred all the Story of the Book of Judges and the translation of the High Priest-hood from the line of Eleazar to the line of Ithamar which is not there mentioned and the cause of which alteration is not recorded f f f Zevachin ubi supr In this time high places were prohibited and at Shiloh there was no roof but a House of Stone below and curtains above and it was a place of rest the most Holy things were eaten within the curtains and the less Holy and second Tithe without c. In these times there is mention of a Sanctuary at Shechem Josh. XXIV 1 25 26. which meaneth only the House where the Ark was lodged for that present time for all the Tribes meeting at Shechem and being to make a Covenant with the Lord they fetch the Ark of the Covenant thither that the presence and dread of the Lord might be more visible among them and the place where the Ark was set for that time was called the Sanctuary as Moses Tent was called the Tabernacle of the Congregation because the Glory of the Lord rested upon it before the Tabernacle of the Congregation it self was built Exod. XXXIII 7. From Shiloh upon that fatal blow that Israel received by the Philistins 1 Sam. IV. the Ark was captived into the Land of these uncircumcised and the Tabernacle removed into another Tribe and they so parted that they never met again till they met together at Solomons Temple The Tabernacle was removed to Nob a City of Priests 1 Sam. XXII 19. in the Tribe of Benjamin Nehem. XI 31 32. and by the Jews Chorography within the sight or prospect of Jerusalem The Chaldee Paraphrast Glosseth Esay X. 32. where there is mention of this Town thus g g g Chald. par in Esa. X. He came and stood in Nob a City of Priests before the Wall of Jerusalem He answered and said unto his Army Is not this the City of Jerusalem for which I have mustered all my Army and for which have I levied all my Province Behold it is less and weaker than any of the Cities that I have subdued He stood and nodded his Head and waved his Hand against the Mountain of the House of the Sanctuary For saith Kimchi from Nob he might see Jerusalem and when he saw it from thence he shook his Hand at it as one despising it I shall not be curious to inquire whether Nob were any of the four Cities that were allotted at the first division to the Priests out of the Tribe of Benjamin Josh. XXI 17 18. or whether it were of a later possession as Ramah was to the Levites of the Stock of Samuel 1 Sam. I. 1. or if Nob were one of those four Cities and the same with Almon for the other three are clearly distinguished from it Esa. X. 29 30. 2 Chron. I. 30. whether it were Bahurim which the Chaldee Paraphrast constantly rendreth Alemeth the same with Almon 1 Chron. VI. 60. I shall only observe this that when the Tabernacle had left the Tribe of Joseph one of the Sons of Rachel it betakes it to Benjamin another Son of the same Mother The warrant of its conveyance hither I doubt not was Divine by some prophetical direction though it be not expressed I dare aver that the removal of it from hence to Gibeon was so though that be not expressed neither and I judge of the one by the other and my reason is this because when David brings up the Ark to his own City and there settles the Priests and Levites in their attendance upon it he also settles Priests and Levites in their attendance on the Tabernacle at Gibeon 2 Chron. XVI 39 40 41 c. Now what reason can be given why David should not rather have fetched up the Tabernacle to his own City as he did the Ark than thus divide the Service of the Priests and Levites but because he knew the Tabernacle was placed in Gibeon by Divine warrant and direction and he would not alter it If the Tabernacle removed to Nob presently upon the captiving of the Ark from Shiloh it resided there about thirty seven years all which time Samuel is alive and seeth both the fall of Shiloh and the fall of Nob and it may very well be he was the director of the Tabernacle from Shiloh to Nob and from Nob to Gibeon In the time of its residence in both these places high places were permitted as the Talmud conceiveth in the place cited even now and the most holy things were eaten within the curtains and the less Holy things in any City of Israel At Gibeon another place of the Tribe of Benjamin did the Tabernacle stay from its first pitching there till Solomon brought it up to the Temple when it was built and whilest it stood here a memorable piece of Divine Justice against Saul cannot but be observed to omit all other particulars for as he had slain the Priests of the Lord and had ruined the Tabernacle at Nob so his Sons are hanged up before the Tabernacle in Gibeon 2 Sam. XXI 9. And now let us trace the Ark as we have done the Tabernacle till we bring them together The Ark being captived by the Philistins in the battel at Aphek was detained in their Land seven months rather because they knew not what to do with it than for any comfort or happiness they found in it for it was a Plague to their Gods People and Country At last it was restored and first to Bethshemesh a City of Priests Josh. XXI 16. but there it proved also the destruction of the People The Hebrew Commentators do scruple both at the cause of the slaughter and at the number slain The cause is not so very abstruse for the Text saith it was because they looked into the Ark though their various construction of the words hath bred their doubting but it is something strange that Bethshemesh a Town of no great note should lose fifty thousand and seventy inhabitants at one time beside what escaped a number of People answerable to the greatest Cities The Commentators spoken of having observed this improbability will heal the matter with as improbable a Gloss Seventy men say they which were valuable every one to fifty thousand and others retaining the scruple still do raise it higher by their Interpretation for the fifty thousand men say they were every one of them valuable to the seventy men in the Sanhedrin The Text doth plainly distinguish of the persons for it saith That he smote of the men of Bethshemesh because they looked into the Ark and he smote of the People For the return of the Ark had occasioned no doubt the concourse of the People all about
began his Reign by the account of the Book of the Maccabees in the one hundred thirty and seventh year of the Reign of the Seleucian family 1 Mac. I. 10. And in the one hundred forty and third year as both that Book and e e e Jos. Ant. l. 12 c. 6. 1 Mac. I. 21. c. Josephus reckon he came up to Jerusalem being invited thither by a wrethed faction of Onias who was also called Menelaus the High Priest and he taketh the City by their means and slew many of the contrary party and took away many of the Holy things and much spoil and so returned to Antioch This was the beginning of those two thousand and three hundred days mentioned in Dan. VIII 13 14. or the days of desolation when the Host and the Sanctuary were both trodden under Foot Two years and some months after namely in the year one hundred and forty five he cometh up again and under colour of peaceableness obtaining entrance he sacketh Jerusalem plundreth the Temple fireth the fairest buildings of the City pulls down the Walls slayeth even some of those that had invited him taketh many thousands prisoners and setteth a Syrian Garrison for a curb to the City and Temple Here was the beginning of those one thousand two hundred and ninety days mentioned Dan. XII 11. The time that the dayly Sacrifice was taken away and the abomination of desolation was set up which space is called a time times and half a time which was three years and an half and some twelve or thirteen days The mischief that this Tyrant and Persecutor wrought to the Temple Nation and Religion is not expressible how he forbad Circumcision abolished Religion burnt the Books of the Law persecuted the Truth murdred those that professed it and defiled the Sanctuary with all manner of abomination insomuch that the Holy Ghost hath set this character upon those sad times that that was a time of trouble such as was not since they were a Nation even to that same time Dan. XII 1. And here began the Story and Glory of Mattatbias the Father of the Maccabean family who withstood this outrage and villany f f f 1 Mac. II. 70. but died in the next year namely one hundred and forty sixth of the Seleucian Kingdom Judas Maccabeus succeeds him in his zeal and command and prevaileth so gallantly against the Commanders appointed by the Tyrant Apollonius Seron Gorgias and Lysâ—as that in the year one hundred forty eight he and his people return and purifie the Temple erect a new Altar restore the Service and keep the Feast of Dedication for eight days and ordain it for an annual solemnity And from thence even till now saith Josephus we keep that Feast and call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Candlemas if I may so English it naming the Feast as I think from this because such a restauration shone upon us unexpected There is mention of this Feast and it was honoured with Christs presence Joh. X. 22. and what was the manner of its solemnity especially by lighting abundance of Candles at it I have shewed in another place Both Josephus and the Book of Maccabeus make it but exactly three years between the time of Antiochus his defiling of the Altar with abomination and Maccabeus his restoring and purifying it again g g g 1 Mac. I. 54. Jos. ubi sup Only the one of them saith its defiling began on the 15 day of the month Cisleu in the one hundred forty and fifth year of the Seleucian Kingdom and the other saith it began on the five and twentieth day of the same month in the same year but both agree that it was purified on the five and twentieth day of the same month in the year one hundred forty and eight which teacheth us how to distinguish upon that passage of Daniel forementioned in Chap. XII 11. namely that the time the daily Sacrifice was taken away was one thousand two hundred and ninety days or three years and an half and some few days over but the time that the abomination that maketh desolate was set up that is Idols in the Temple and an Idol Altar upon the Lords Altar was but three years Antiochus died in Persia within forty five days after the restoring of the Temple as Dan. XII 12. seemeth to intimate when it pronounceth him blessed that cometh to one thousand three hundred thirty and five days for then he should see the Tyrants death h h h Id. ibid. cap. 15. His son Antiochus Eupator who succeeded him was invited into Judea by some Apostate Jews to come to curb Judas Maccabeus who was besieging the Syrian Garrison that was in Jerusalem He cometh with a mighty power forceth Judas into the Temple and there besiegeth him But being straitned for provisions and hearing of stirrings in his own Kingdom he offereth the besieged honourable conditions upon which they surrender But he entring and seeing the strength of the place and suspecting it might be troublesom to him again he breaketh his Articles and his Oath and putteth down the Wall that incompassed the holy ground down to the ground And thus poor Judas and the Temple are in a worse condition than before for the Antiochian Garrison in Jerusalem that was ready upon all occasions to annoy it is not only not removed but now is the Temple laid naked to their will and fury i i i ibid. This Antiochus put Menelaus the High Priest to death and he rewarded him but justly for calling the Tyrant this Mans Father in and he made Alcimus High Priest in his stead one that was not of the High Priests line at all which made Onias who was next to the High Priesthood indeed to flee into Egypt and thereby the favour Ptolomy Philometor he built a Temple parallel to that at Jerusalem And thus hath Jerusalem Temple two corrivals a Temple on Mount Gerizim in Samaria on the North and a Temple in Egypt on the South Of this Temple built by Onias in Egypt the Talmudical Writers do make frequent and renowned mention They speak in the Treatise k k k Succah per. 5. Succah of a great Synagogue or Sanhedrin here in the time of Alexander the Great in which they say there were seventy golden Chairs and a Congregation belonging to it of double the number of Israelites that came out of Egypt And that Alexander destroyed them to bring upon them the curse denounced by Jeremy against their going down into Egypt Jer. XLIV and the curse due to them for the violation of the command Ye shall return thither to Egypt no more l l l Ios. Ant. lib 13 cap. 6. Iuchas sol 14. Yet would Onias venture to build a Temple here again and that the rather building upon that Prophesie Esay XIX 19. There shall be an Altar to the Lord in the Land of Egypt c. Upon which passage take the Gloss of R. Solomon m m
that she was a witch I have therefore cited these passages not only that it may be shewn that there were women Pharisees and so that the name is not taken from interpreting or expounding but that it may be observed also what kind of women for the most part embrace Phariseism namely Widows and Maids under the vail of Sanctity and Devotion hiding and practising all manner of wickedness And so much we gain of the history of the Pharisees while we are tracing the etymology of the word II. That the Pharisees therefore were so called from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying Separation is more commonly asserted and more truly and the thing it self as well as the word speaks it so that by a word more known to us you might rightly call the Pharisees Separatists but in what sense has need of more narrow enquiry The differences of the Jewish people are to be disposed here into divers ranks and first we will begin with the Women 1. It were an infinite task to search particularly how their Canons indulged shall I say or prescribed the Woman a freedom from very many rites in which a great part of the Jewish religion was placed How numberless are the times that that occurs in the Talmudic Pandect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 d d d d d d Berac cap. 3 hal 3. Women servants and children are not bound to these things e e e e e e Hieros Kiddush fol. 61. 3. Women servants and children are not bound to recite their Phylacteries nor to wear them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Passovers of Women are at their own Will And not to dwell upon things that are obvious let this one serve instead of many f f f f f f Bab. Sotah fol. 21. 2. A certain Matron asked R. Eleazar Why when Aaron sinned in making the Golden Calf the people are punished with a threefold death He answered Let not a Woman be learned beyond her distaff Hirâ—anus his son said unto him Because no answer is given her in one word out of the Law She will withdraw from us three hundred tenth Cori yearly To whom he replied Let them rather go and be burnt than the words of the Law be delivered to Women From hence it appears that the Women that embraced Pharisaism did it of their own free will and vow not by command which the Men Pharisees also did 2. Pass we from the Women to the Men and first to the lowest degrees of Men in the distinction relating to Religion namely to them whom they ordinarily called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Illiterate and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The people of the Earth or the Plebeians Of them thus the Gemara in Sotah newly cited g g g g g g Fol. 22. 1. One reads the Scriptures and recites the Mishna and yet he waits not upon the Scholars of the Wise-men what of him R. Eleazar saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is one of the people of the earth R. Samuel bar Nachmani saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold this is an illiterate man R. Jannai saith behold this is a Cuthean R. Achabar Jacob saith behold This is a Magician And a little after Who is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the people of the Earth R. Meir saith He that recites not his Phylacteries morning and evening with his prayers But the Wise men say He whosoever he be that lays not up his Phylacteries Ben Azzai saith He who hath not a fringe on his garment R. Jochanan ben Joseph saith He that instructs not his sons in the doctrine of the Law Others say He who although he read the Scriptures and repeats the Traditions yet attends not on the Scholars of the Wise men this is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the people of the Earth or the Plebeian Does he read the Scriptures and not repeat the Tradition Behold this man is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Illiterate The Gloss upon the place speaks thus The people of the Earth are they of whom there is suspicion of Tenths and cleanness that is lest they tithe not rightly nor take care aright concerning cleansings And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the illiterate person is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more vile or inferior than the people of the Earth Compare that John VII 49. The people that knoweth not the Law is cursed The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Collegians or Associates and Scholars of the Wise men were opposed to these Vulgar persons Under the title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Scholars of the Wise men are comprehended all that were learned and studious under the title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Religious as well learned as unlearned There were some of the learned whom they commonly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Collegians of the Rabbins who as yet were Candidates and not preferred to the publick office of teaching or judging The thing may be illustrated by one Example 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 h h h h h h Hieros Sanhedr fol. 18. 3. Do the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Collegians enter in to appoint the New Moon R. Hoshaia said When I was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Collegian R. Samuel ben R. Isaac led me in to the appointment of the New Moon but I knew not whether I were of the number or no. And a little after Do the Collegians or Fellows go in to intercalate the year Let us learn this from the example of Rabban Gamaliel who said Let the seven Seniors meet me in the Chamber But eight entred Who came in hither saith he without leave I answered Samuel the little In this sense the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Collegue differs nothing from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Scholar of a Wise man in that both signifie a Student and a Learned man But the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Collegue hath a wider sense denoting all such who have more professedly devoted themselves to Religion and have professed a more devout Life and Rule than the common people whether they were learned or unlearned whether of the Sect of the Pharisees or of the Sadduces or some other Hence you have mention of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i i i i i i Bab. Berac fol. 44. 2. a religious Samaritan and of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 k k k k k k Ioma fol. 8. 2. a religious Baker And the phrase seems to be drawn from Psal. CXIX 63. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am a companion of all those that fear thee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They take upon them the habit of Religion See the Babylonian Talmud in l l l l l l Fol. 7. 1. Avodah Zarah in the Gloss. That distinction also is worthy of consideration of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 m m m m m m Hieros Bava Bâ—thra fol. 17. 1 The greater and the less Religious Yet the word seems sometimes to be appropriated to the Pharisees as being
examples of this nature Let a third Decad also be added that nothing may be left unsaid in this matter giving examples of the parts of the phrase distinctly and by themselves 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i i i i i i Maimon Mamrim cap. 2. The things which they bound not that they might make a hedg to the Law 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 k k k k k k Id. in Hameâ—s Matsah cap. 1. The Scribes bound the leaven 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l l l l l l Id. ibid. cap. 5. They neither punished nor bound unless concerning the leaven it self 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 m m m m m m Id. ib. cap. 9. The wise men bound the eating of leaven from the beginning of the sixth hour of the day of the Passover 5. n n n n n n Hieros Avod Zarah fol. 39. 2 R. Abhu saith R. Gamaliel ben Rabbi asked me What if I should go into the Market 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And I bound it him 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 o o o o o o Maimon Mamrim cap. 2. The Sanhedrin which looseth two things let it not hasten to loose three 2. p p p p p p Tanchum fol. 1. 3. R. Iochanan saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They necessarily loose saluting on the Sabbath 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 q q q q q q Id. fol. 74. 3. The wise men loose all oyls or all fat things 4. r r r r r r Schabb. cap. 1. Hal. 5. The School of Shammai saith They do not steep ink colours and vetches on the Eve of the Sabbath unless they be steeped before the day be ended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the School of Hillel looseth it Many more such like instances occur there 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 s s s s s s Hieros Schab fol. 3. 1. R. Meir loosed the mixing of wine and oyl to anoint a sick man on the Sabbath To these may be added if need were the frequent shall I say or infinite use of the phrases 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Bound and Loosed which we meet with thousands of times over But from these allegations the Reader sees abundantly enough both the frequency and the common use of this phrase and the sense of it also namely first that it is used in Doctrine and in Judgments concerning things allowed or not allowed in the Law Secondly that to bind is the same with to forbid or to declare forbidden To think that Christ when he used the common phrase was not understood by his hearers in the common and vulgar sense shall I call it a matter of laughter or of madness To this therefore do these words amount When the time was come wherein the Mosaic Law as to some part of it was to be abolished and left off and as to another part of it was to be continued and to last for ever he granted Peter here and to the rest of the Apostles Chap. XVIII v. 18. a power to abolish or confirm what they thought good and as they thought good being taught this and led by the Holy Spirit as if he should say Whatsoever ye shall bind in the law of Moses that is forbid it shall be forbidden the Divine Authority confirming it and whatsoever ye shall loose that is permit or shall teach that it is permitted and lawful shall be lawful and permitted Hence they Bound that is forbad Circumcision to the Believers eating of things offered to Idols of things strangled and of blood for a time to the Gentiles and that which they bound on earth was confirmed in Heaven They loosed that is allowed Purification to Paul and to four other Brethren for the shunning of scandal Act. XXI 24. and in a word by these words of Christ it was committed to them the Holy Spirit directing that they should make Decrees concerning Religion as to the use or rejection of Mosaic Rites and Judgments and that either for a time or for ever Let the words be applied by way of Paraphrase to the matter that was transacted at present with Peter I am about to build a Gentile Church saith Christ and to thee O Peter do I give the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven that thou maist first open the door of faith to them but if thou askest by what Rule that Church is to be governed when the Mosaic Rule may seem so improper for it thou shalt be so guided by the Holy Spirit that whatsoever of the Law of Moses thou shalt forbid them shall be forbidden whatsoever thou grantest them shall be granted and that under a sanction made in Heaven Hence in that instant when he should use his Keys that is when he was now ready to open the Gate of the Gospel to the Gentiles Act. X. he was taught from Heaven that the consorting of the Jew with the Gentile which before had been bound was now loosed and the eating of any Creature convenient for food was now loosed which before had been bound and he in like manner looses both these Those words of our Saviour Joh. XX. 23. Whose sins ye remit they are remitted to them for the most part are forced to the same sense with these before us when they carry quite another sense Here the business is of Doctrine only not of Persons there of Persons not of Doctrine Here of things lawful or unlawful in Religion to be determined by the Apostles there of persons obstinate or not obstinate to be punished by them or not to be punished As to Doctrine the Apostles were doubly instructed 1. So long sitting at the feet of their Master they had imbided the Evangelical Doctrine 2. The Holy Spirit directing them they were to determine concerning the Legal Doctrine and practice being compleatly instructed and enabled in both by the Holy Spirit descending upon them As to the Persons they were endowed with a peculiar gift so that the same spirit directing them if they would retain and punish the sins of any a power was delivered into their hands of delivering to Satan of punishing with diseases plagues yea death it self which Peter did to Anâ—â—ias and Saphira Paul to Elymas Hymeneus and Philâ—tus c. CHAP. XVII VERS II. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And was Transfigured WHEN Christ was Baptized being now ready to enter upon his Evangelical Priesthood he is sealed by a heavenly voice for the High Priest and is anointed with the Holy Spirit as the High Priests were wont to be with holy oyl In his Transfiguration he is sealed for the High Priest for mark 1. How two of the greatest Prophets Moses and Elias resort to him 2. How to those words This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased which also were heard from Heaven at his Baptism is added that Clause Hear ye him which compare with the words of Moses concerning a Prophet to be raised up by God Deut. XVIII 19. Whosoever shall
yet further confirm our opinion that the authority of that Council in capital matters was not taken away by the Romans we will produce two stories as clear examples of the thing we assert One is this l l l l l l Hieros Sanhedr fol. 24. 2. R. Lazar Son of R. Zadok said When I was a little Boy sitting on my Fathers shoulders I saw the Daughter of a Priest that had played the harlot compassed round with fagots and burnt The Council no doubt judging and condemning her and this after Judea had then groaned many years under the Roman yoke for that same R. Lazar saw the destruction of the City The other you have in the same Tract m m m m m m Fol. 25. 4. where they are speaking of the manner of pumping out evidence against a Heretick and seducer of the people They place say they two witnesses in ambush in the inner part of the house and him in the outward with a candle burning by him that they may see and hear him Thus they dealt with Ben Sudta in Lydda They placed two Disciples of the wise in ambush for him and they brought him before the Council and stoned him The Jews openly profess that this was done to him in the days of R. Akiba long after the destruction of the City and yet then as you see the Council still retained its authority in judging of capital causes They might do it for all the Romans if they dared do it to the Criminals But so much thus far concerning its authority let us now speak of its present seat n n n n n n Bab. Rosh hashanah fol. 31. 1. The Council removed from the Chamber Gazith to the sheds from the sheds into Jerusalem from Jerusalem to Jasne from Jasne to Osha from Osha to Shepharaama from Shepharaama to Bethshaarim from Bethshaarim to Tsippor from Tsippor to Tiberias c. We conjecture that the great Bench was driven from its seat the Chamber Gazith half a year or thereabout before the death of Christ but whether they sat then in the sheds a place in the Court of the Gentiles or in the City when they debated about the death of Christ does not clearly appear since no Authors make mention how long it sat either here or there Those things that are mentioned in Chap. XXVII 4 5 6. seem to argue that they sat in the Temple These before us that they sat in the City Perhaps in both places for it was not unusual with them to return thither as occasion served from whence they came only to the Chamber Gazith they never went back Whence the Gloss on the place lately cited They sat in Jasne in the days of Rabban Jochanan in Osha in the days of Rabban Gamaliel for they returned from Osha to Jasne c. Thus the Council which was removed from Jerusalem to Jasne before the destruction of the City returned thither at the Feast and sat as before Hence Paul is brought before the Council at Hierusalem when Jasne at that time was its proper seat And hence Rabban Simeon President of the Council was taken and killed in the siege of the City and Rabban Jochanan his Vice-president was very near it both of them being drawn from Jasne to the City with the rest of the Bench for observation of the Passover Whether the Hall of the High Priest were the ordinary receptacle for the Council or only in the present occasion we do not here enquire It is more material to enquire concerning the Bench it self and who sat President in judging The President of the Council at this time was Rabban Gamaliel Paul's Master and the Vice-president Rabban Simeon his Son or Rabban Jochanan ben Zaccai which we do not dispute now Whence therefore had the chief Priest here and in other places the precedence and the chief voice in judging For thus in Stephen's case the High Priest is the chief of the inquisition Act. VI. 1. also in Paul's case Act. XXIII 2. see also Act. IX 1. Had the Priests a Council and Judgment-seat of their own Or might they in the chief Council when the President was absent hear causes of life and death To this long question and that enough perplexed we reply these few things I. We confess indeed that the Priest had a Bench and Council of their own yet denying that there was a double Council one for Ecclesiastical the other for Civil affairs as some would have it 1. We meet often with mention of the Chamber of the Councellors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 next the Court which is also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 concerning which thus the Bab. Joma o o o o o o Fol. 8. The Tradition of R. Juda What was it the Chamber of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Was it not the Chamber 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Councellors At first it was called the Chamber of the Councellors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But when the High Priesthood came to be bought with money and changed yearly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Kings Presidents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are changed every year from that time forward it was called The Chamber of the Presidents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hear the Glosser on this place The High Priests were wicked and did not fulfill their whole year and he that succeeded the other changed this building and adorned it that it might be called by his own name Hear also the Gemara The first Temple stood four hundred and ten years and there were not above eighteen Priests under it The second stood four hundred and twenty years and there were more than three hundred under it Take out forty years of Simeon the Just eighty of Jochanan ten of Ismael ben Phabi and eleven of Eleazar ben Harsum and there doth not remain one whole year to each of the rest Behold the Chamber of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Councellors properly so called because the Priests did meet and sit there not to judg but to consult and that only of things belonging to the Temple Here they consulted and took care that all persons and things belonging and necessary to the worship of God should be in readiness that the buildings of the Temple and the Courts should be kept in repair and that the publick Liturgy should be duly performed but in the mean time they wanted all power of judging and punishing they had no authority to sine scourge or put to death yea and in a word to exercise any judgment for by their own examination and authority they could not admit a Candidate into the Priesthood but he was admitted by the authority of the Council p p p p p p Bab. Joma fol. 19. 1. In the Chamber Gazith sat the Council of Israel and held the examinations of Priests whosoever was not found sit was sent away in black clothes and a black veil whosoever was â—ound fit was clothed
Fathers of the Sanhedrin and Rulers of the people and so in reviling him he transgressed that precept Thou shalt not speak evil of the Ruler of thy people as well as if he had reviled the High Priest II. It is very little to the credit of the Apostle to think that when he said God shall smite thee thou whited wall c. That he uttered it rashly and unadvisedly or carried away in an heat of passion and indignation or that he did not know whom he thus threatned or what degree and office he held But he spoke it soberly and as became an Apostle by the Authority and guidance of the Holy Ghost Nor did he nor had he any need to retract those words or make apology for his rashness but they are of the very same tenor with the rest that he uttered III. If this Ananias was that Sagan of the Priests that perished in the destruction of Jerusalem as hath been already said I would conceive his death was foretold prophetically by the Apostle rather than that he rashly poured out words that he afterwards retracted Let me therefore paraphrase upon the words before us I know it is not lawful to speak evil of the Ruler of the people nor would I have said these things to him which I have if I had owned such an one but I did not own him so for he is not worthy the name of an High Priest IV. The President of the Sanhedrin at this time was Rabban Simeon ben Gamaliel his Father Gamaliel having been dead about two or three years before Paul knew Simeon and Simeon very well knew him having been fellow Disciples and both sate together at the feet of Gamaliel nor indeed could he be ignorant of any of the Rulers of the people if they were of any age because he had been so long educated and conversed in Jerusalem So that it is very improbable he should not know either Ananias the High Priest if he were now present or Ananias the Sagan or indeed any of the Fathers of the Sanhedrin if they had any years upon their backs Indeed not a few years had passed since he had left Jerusalem But seeing formerly he had spent so many years there and had been of that Degree and Order that he was an Officer of the Sanhedrin and had a Patent from them he could not have so slippery and treacherous a memory but that upon his return he could readily know and distinguish their faces and persons And whereas it is said in the Verse immediately following That Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees c. If it should be asked whence he came to distinguish so well concerning their persons it may be answered That if he had no other ways to know them he might understand that by his former knowledge of them He had known them from the time that he himself had been a Pharisee and conversed among them See Chap. XXII 5. V. Forasmuch therefore as he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I wist not I do not see how it can argue so much an ignorance of his person with whom he might have had some former transactions in obtaining that accursed commission against the followers of Christ but that it must relate to his affection rather than his understanding So that the sense is I knew not that there was any High Priest at all or I do not acknowledge this person for such an one It was safer to inveigh against the person than the office But if he had said concerning the very office I do not know that there is any High Priest at all I question not but he had uttered his mind being well assured that that High Priesthood was now antiquated by the death of our great High Priest Jesus For let us lay down this Problem Although the Apostle as to other things had owned the service of the Temple for he was purified in it Yet as to the High Priesthood he did not own the peculiar ministry of that doth it not carry truth with it seeing God by an irrefragrable token viz. the rending of the Veil of the Temple from the top to the bottom had shewn the end and abolishing of that office But suppose the words of the Apostle relate to the person and not the office and that they were spoken in reference to the man himself I do not own him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 High Priest that he is not worthy of that title Perhaps St. Paul knew of old how wicked a person he had been or from his present injustice or rash severity had reason enough to make such a reply To know instead of to own and acknowledge is not unusual in Scripture stile that is a sad and dreadful instance enough I know you not depart from me ye workers of iniquity And in the Jewish Writings when R. Judah being angry with Bar Kaphrah only said to him I know thee not he went away as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one rebuked and took 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the rebuke to himself The story is this z z z z z z Moed Katon sol 16. 1. When bar Kaphrah came to visit him he said unto him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 O Bar Kaphrah I never knew thee He understood what he meant Therefore he took the rebuke unto himself for the space of thirty days VERS VIII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Sadducees say there is no Resurrection WHAT therefore is the Religion of a Sadducee He Prays he Fasts he offers Sacrifice he observes the Law and yet doth not expect a Resurrection or life Eternal To what end is this Religion It is that he may obtain Temporal good things observing only the promise of them made in the Law and he seeks for nothing beyond the meer letter That the Sadducees took their denomination from one Sadoc a Disciple of Antigonus Socheus is commonly received and that not without reason In the mean time it may not be amiss to enquire whether Sadoc did himself deny the resurrection and whether he rejected all the Books of the Holy Scripture excepting the five Books of Moses which the Sadducees in some measure did I. The Jewish writers do relate his story with so much variety that as some represent him we might think he denies the resurrection and future rewards but as others that he did not For so say some a a a a a a Yuchasin fol. 15. 2. Sadoc and Baithus were the heads of the Hereticks for they erred concerning the words of their Master c. b b b b b b Ramban in Avoth cap. 1. Sadoc and Baithus hearing this passage from their Master be ye not as Servants that serve their Master for hire and reward sake c. they said among themselves our Master teaches us that there is neither reward nor punishment c. Therefore they departed from the rule and forsook the Law c. Others say otherwise c c c c c c
shews they are hard set when they must make Caiaphas a copy after whom to write the Infallibility of their Papal chair But they gazed so much upon the chair when they wrote this Note that they clean looked off the Book and Text they had before them For had they looked well upon that that would have given them a more proper reason of his prophesying and indeed the proper reason of it namely not so much because he was High Priest as because he was High Priest that year This he spake not of himself but being High Priest that year High Priest that year Why He had been High Priest several years before So Luke tells us Chap. III. that he was High Priest when Christ was baptized three years and an half ago and Josephus tells us as much and more and of his being High Priest after this year also And therefore why that circumstance added He was High Priest that year To speak the proper reason of his prophesying First I might say That was the year nay even the hour of the last gasp of the High Priesthood It prophesied and instantly breathed out its last There is much dispute upon those words of Paul Act. XXIII 5. which our English renders I wist not Brethren that he was the High Priest If I should render it I knew not that there is an High Priest I am sure it hath warrant enough of the Original Greek and warrant enough of the truth of the thing it self Did not the High Priesthood dye and cease and was no more when the great High Priest of Souls died and by death made expiation for his people If you will allow the other Priesthood and the employment of it to live still after the death of Christ and his sacrifice offered by the eternal Spirit till the fall of Jerusalem and dissolution of the Temple yet can you find nothing that the High Priest had then to do that it should survive any longer after Christ was sacrificed The other Priesthood had something to do besides what was most plainly typical in it and referred to the death of Christ as sacrificing and sprinkling of blood did For they had to offer the first fruits of the people for their Thankfulness to purifie women after child-birth to present the first born to the Lord c. But the distinctive work of the High Priest in diversity from the other Priesthood was on the day of Expiation to go within the Vail into the most holy place with blood and make an Attonement Which when Christ had done through the Vail of his flesh through his own blood as the Apostle tells us Heb. X. 20. what had the High Priesthood to do any more To this peculiarly related that which occurred at the death of the great High Priest Matth. XXVII 15. The vail of the Temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom Which when you come narrowly to examine you will find to be the vail that hung between the holy and most holy place Which the Jews in their writings call by a Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the vail that the High Priest turned aside as we do hangings at a door to go into the room And he went into the most holy place only once a year But now it is rent in pieces no such distinction or separation thenceforward to be had and no such work of the High Priest to be done any more So that if we take these words of Paul to the sense I mentioned viz. I knew not Brethren that there is now any High Priest or any High Priesthood at all that Function is long ago laid in the dust it was spoken like a Paul boldly and as one that very well understood and could well distinguish twixt substance and shadow and how long those Ordinances of that Oeconomy were to last and when to decay And if accordingly we take that circumstance in the Text He prophesied as being High Priest that year in the sense I mentioned namely that last year of the being and life of the High Priesthood it gives a story not much unlike that of the son of King Crâ—sus Who when he had been dumb from the birth and never spake word at last seeing in a battel an enemy ready to run his Father through he forced his Tongue so as that he broke the string of silence and cryed out O man do not kill Croesus So the High Priesthood having been dumb from Prophesying for above four hundred years together and never spoken one Prophetick word when now the King is ready to be slain its Tongue is loosed in Caiaphas and prophesieth of the Redemption of all the Israel of God and presently expireth But Secondly That year was the great year of pouring down the Spirit of Prophesie and Revelation as in Act. II. the great year of sealing Vision and Prophesie as in Dan. IX And then it is the less wonder if this dog get some crumbs that fell from that plentiful table of the children and some droppings from that abundant dew that fell upon the Fleece of Gedeon Something like the case of Eldad and Medad but they were better men Numb XI 26. that in that great pouring out of the Spirit there had their share though they were not in the company of those that were assembled at the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation And thus was the case with Caiaphas as it was with Balaam that wretch inspired till then by the Devil but then by God Who went purposely to curse Israel but God so overpowered and turned the stream that he could not but bless them So this wretch inspired with malice from the Devil to plot and compass the death of Christ is now also inspired by the Spirit of Prophesie to foretel his death and to proclaim it Redemption to his people A very strange passage that while he was sinning against the Holy Ghost he prophesied by the Holy Ghost and that in those very words that he spake against Christ to destroy him he should prophesie of Christs death and Redemption to magnifie it So can the Spirit of God overpower the Hearts and Tongues and actions of Men to serve the design of his own glory And this is that that I shall speak to I might observe obiter how great diversity there is twixt the Spirit of Prophesie and Revelation and the Spirit of grace and holiness The same Spirit indeed is the Author of both but there is so much diversity in the thing wrought that a Balaam a Caiaphas have the Spirit of Prophesie who are as far from having the Spirit of Sanctification as the East is from the West Hell from Heaven A mistake hath taken the Spirits of too many to account this good Language and Divinity I am a believer converted sanctified therefore I have the Spirit of Revelation and I can preach and expound Scripture by that Spirit little considering the vast diversity of the gift of Prophesie