Religion But the Truth is if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here signifies a certain and determinate place that opposed in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there must be Salem where Melchisedec dwelt which was not only afterwards Tithable as within the Bounds of Canaan but most probably was Hierusalem it self as we have declared This Conjecture therefore is too Curious nor do we need to tye up our selves unto the precise signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 although that also be sometimes used with respect unto time as well as place VVherefore these words here and there do express the several different states under Consideration Here is in the case of the Levitical Priesthood and There respects the case of Melchisedec as stated Gen. 14. Secondly The Foundation of the Comparison that wherein both agreed is in this that they received Tithes It is expressed of the one sort only namely the Levitical Priests they received Tithes but it is understood of the other also whereon the word is repeated and inserted in our Translation but there he receiveth them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They do receive Tithes in the Present Tense But it may be said there was none that then did so or at least de jure could do so seeing the Law of Tithing was abolished Wherefore an Enallage may be allowed here of the present time for that which was past they do that is they did so whilst the Law was in force But neither is this Necessary For as I have before Observed the Apostle admits or takes it for granted that the Mosaical System of Worship was yet continued and argueth on that concession unto the Necessity of its approaching abolition And yet we need not here the Use of this Supposition For the words determine neither time nor place but the state of Religion under the Law According unto the Law are Tithes to be paid unto and received by such Persons This therefore is agreed That both the Levitical Priests and Melchisedec received Tithes The Opposition and Difference lyes in the Qualification and Properties of them by whom they are received For 1. Those on the one side that is of the Levitical Priesthood were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Homines qui moriuntur or homines morientes Men that dye dying men that is Men subject unto Death Mortal men who lived and dyed in the Discharge of their Office according unto the Common Laws of Mortality And the Observation of Schlictingius on these words is as far as I can understand Useless unto his own Design much more to the Apostles Notandum vero quod non mortalibus hominibus sed morientibus tantum Melchisedecum Author opponat nec immortalem eum esse sed vivere dicit vita autem non mortalitati sed morti proprie opponitur Something is aimed at in way of Security unto another Opinion namely that all men were Created in a state of Mortality without respect unto Sin But nothing is gotten by this Subtility For by Dying men the Apostle intends not Men that were actually dying as it were at the point of Death For in that Condition the Priests could neither execute their Office nor receive Tithes of the People Only he describes such Persons as in the whole course of their Ministry were liable unto Death from the Common Condition of Mortality and in their several Seasons dyed accordingly Wherefore dying men or men Subject to Death and Mortal men are in this case the same And although Life as to the Principle of it be opposed unto Death yet as unto a continual Duration the thing here intended by the Apostle it is opposed unto Mortality or an obnoxiousness unto Death For a Representation is designed of him who was made a Priest not after the Law of a Carnal Commandment but after the Power of an endless Life Wherefore saith the Apostle those who received Tithes after the Law were all of them Mortal men that had both Beginning of Days and End of Life So the Death of Aaron the first of them and in him of all his Successors is Recorded in the Scripture In Opposition unto this state of the Levitical Priests it is affirmed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Case of Melchisedec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is Witnessed that he Liveth How he Liveth and how it is Witnessed unto that he Liveth we must Enquire For it is apparently of Melchisedec of whom in the first place as the Type these things are spoken and yet we know that really and in his own Person he was Dead long before But there are several things on the Account whereof it is said that it is witnessed that he Liveth For 1. Whatever the Scripture is silent in as to Melchisedec which it usually relates of others in the like state our Apostle takes for a Contrary Testimony unto him For he lays down this general Principle That what the Scripture conceals of Melchisedec it doth it to Instruct us in the Mystery of his Person and Ministry as Types of Christ and his Hence the Silence of the Scripture in what it useth to express must in this case be Interpreted as a Testimony unto the contrary So it witnessed of him that he was without Father without Mother without Descent in that it mentioneth none of them And whereas he had neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life Recorded in the Scripture it is thereby witnessed that not absolutely but as to his Typical consideration he Liveth For there are no bounds nor periods fixed unto his Priesthood nor did it expire by the bringing in that of Levi as that did by the Introduction of Christ's 2. He did actually continue his Office unto the end of that Dispensation of God and his Worship wherein he was employed and this witnesseth the perpetuity of his Life in opposition unto the Levitical Priests For these two States are compared by the Apostle that of Melchisedec and that of Levi. There was a time limited unto this Priesthood in the House of Aaron and during that time one Priest died and another Succeeded in several Generations until they were greatly multiplyed as the Apostle observeth ver 23. But during the whole Dispensation of things with respect unto Melchisedec he continued in his own Person to execute his Office from first to last without being Subject unto Death wherein it is witnessed that he Liveth 3. He is said to Live that is always to do so because his Office continueth for ever and yet no meer Mortal Man Succeeded him therein 4. In this whole Matter he is considered not Absolutely and Personally but Typically and as a Representation of somewhat else And what is Represented in the Type but is really subjectively and properly found only in the Antitype may be affirmed of the Type as such So it is in all Sacramental Institutions as the Paschal Lamb was called expressely Gods Passover Exod. 12. 11. when it was only a Pledge and Token thereof as under the New
Evidence of Imperfection And by the Appointment of this Order God signified an Imperfection and Mutability in that Church state Succession indeed was a Relief against death but it was but a Relief and so supposed a want and weakness Under the Gospel it is not so as we shall see afterwards Observe that God will not fail to provide Instruments for his work that he hath to accomplish If many Priests be needful many the Church shall have 3 The Reason of this Multiplication of Priests was because they were not suffered to continue by reason of Death They were mortal men subject unto death and they died Death suffered them not to continue in the Execution of their Office It forbad them so to do in the name of the great Sovereign Lord of Life and Death And hereof an Instance was given in Aaron the first of them God to shew the nature of this Priesthood unto the people and to manifest that the everlasting Priest was not yet come commanded Aaron to dye in the sight of all the Congregation Num. 20. 25 26 27 28. So did they all afterwards as other men dye in their several Generations They were all by death forbidden to continue Death laid an injunction on them one after another from proceeding any farther in the Administration of their Office It is not surely without some especial design that the Apostle thus expresseth their dying They were by death prohibited to continue Wherefore he shews hereby 1. The way whereby an end was put unto the personal Administration and that was by death 2. That there was an Imperfection in the Administration of that Office which was so frequently interrupted 3. That they were seized upon by death whether they would or no when it may be they would have earnestly desired to continue and the people also would have rejoyced in it Death came on them neither desired nor expected with his Prohibition 4. That when death came and seized on them it kept them under its power so that they could never more attend unto their Office But it was otherwise with the Priest of the better Covenant as we shall see immediately Observe 1. There is such a necessity of the continual Administration of the Sacerdotal Office in behalf of the Church that the interruption of it by the death of the Priests was an Argument of the weakness of that Priesthood The High Priest is the Sponsor and Mediator of the Covenant Those of old were so Typically and by way of Representation VVherefore all Covenant Transactions between God and the Church must be through him He is to offer up all Sacrifices and therein represent all our prayers And it is evident from thence what a Ruin it would be unto the Church to be without an High Priest one moment Who would venture a suprizal unto his own soul in such a condition Could any man enjoy a moments peace if he supposed that in his extremity the High Priest might dye This now is provided against as we shall see in the next verse VER 24. But this man because he continueth ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood IN opposition unto what was observed in the Levitical Priests the contrary is here affirmed of the Lord Christ. And the Design of the Apostle is still the same namely to evince by all sorts of Instances his Preeminence as a Priest above them as such also 1. The Person spoken of is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Exceptive Conjunction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but answereth unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before used and introduceth the other member of the Antithesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hic ille iste He of whom we speak namely Jesus the Surety of the New Testament We render it this man not improperly he was the Mediator between God and man the man Christ Jesus Nor doth the calling of him this man exclude his Divine nature for he was truly a man though God and man in one Person And the things here ascribed unto him were wrought in and by the humane nature though he that wrought them were God also But He or this man who was represented by Melchisedec of whom we speak 2. It is affirmed of this Person that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood the Ground and Reason whereof is assigned namely because he continueth ever which must be first considered The sole Reason here insisted on by the Apostle why the Levitical Priests were many is because they were forbidden by death to continue It is sufficient therefore on the contrary to prove the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Christ that he abideth for ever For he doth not absolutely hereby prove the perpetuity of the Priesthood but his perpetual uninterrupted Administration of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the Faith of the Jews concerning the Messiah and his office We have heard say they out of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 12. 34. That Christ abideth for ever whereon they could not understand what he told them about his being lifted up by Death And so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to abide to continue in any state or condition Joh. 21. 22 23. And this was that which principally he was Typed in by Melchisedec concerning whom there is no Record as to the Beginning of Days or End of Life but as unto the Scripture Description of him he is said to abide a Priest for ever It may be said in opposition hereunto that the Lord Christ dyed also and that no less truely and really than did Aaron or any Priest of his Order Wherefore it will not hence follow that he had any more an uninterrupted Priesthood than they had Some say the Apostle here considers the Priesthood of Christ only after his Resurrection and Ascension into Heaven after which he dyes no more death hath no more power over him And if we will believe the Socinians then he first began to be a Priest This Figment I have fully confuted elsewhere And there is no ground in the Context on which we may conjecture that the Apostle intends the Administration of his Priesthood in Heaven only although he intend that also For he speaks of his Priesthood as typed by that of Melchisedec which as we have proved before respected the whole of his Office I say therefore that although Christ dyed yet he was not forbid by death to abide in his Office as they were He died as a Priest they died from being Priests He died as a Priest because he was also to be a Sacrifice But he abode and continued not only vested with his Office but in the execution of it in the state of death Through the indissolubleness of his Person his soul and body still subsisting in the Person of the Son of God he was a capable subject of his Office And his being in the state of the dead belonged unto the Administration of his Office no less than his Death it self So that from the first
not only be remembred but also rewarded It is unto the Righteous as we have observed not only a Resurrection from the dead but a Resurrection unto Life that is Eternal as their Reward And this is that which either doth or ought to give Life and Diligence unto our Obedience So Moses in what he did and suffered for Christ had respect unto the recompence of reward Heb. 11. 26. God hath put this declaration hereof into the foundation of all our Obedience in the Covenant I am thy exceeding great reward Gen. 15. 1. And at the close of it the Lord Jesus doth not think it enough to declare that he will come himself but also that his reward is with him Rev. 22. 12. Some have foolishly supposed that this Reward from God must needs infer Merit in our selves whereas Eternal Life is the Gift of God through Jesus Christ and not the wages of our works as Sin is of death Rom. 6. 23. It is such reward as is absolutely a free gift a gift of Grace and if it be by Grace then it is no more of works otherwise Grace is no more Grace and if it be of works then it is no more Grace otherwise work is no more work Rom. 11. 6. The same thing cannot be of Works and Grace also of our own Merit and of the free Gift of God And others it is to be feared under a mistaken pretence of Grace do keep off themselves from a due respect unto this gracious reward which the Lord Christ hath appointed as the blessed issue and end of our Obedience But hereby they deprive themselves of one great motive and encouragement thereunto especially of an endeavour that their Obedience may be such and the fruits of it so abound that the Lord Christ may be signally glorified in giving out a gracious reward unto them at the last day For whereas he hath designed in his own Grace and Bounty to give us such a glorious Reward and intendeth by the Operation of his Spirit to make us fit to receive it or meet for the Inheritance of Saints in Light Col. 1. 12. our principal respect unto this Reward is that we may receive it with an advantage of Glory and Honour unto our Lord Jesus And the consideration hereof which is conveyed unto us through the Faith of the Resurrection is a chief animating principle of our Obedience 2. It hath the same respect unto our Consolation For if in this Life only we have hope in Christ then are we of all men most miserable 1 Cor. 15. 19. that is if we regard only outward things in this world Reproaches Scornings Revilings Troubles Persecutions have been the Lot of most of them who so hoped in Christ. But is this all which we shall have from him or by him probably as to outward things it will prove so to most of us in this world if it come not to greater extremities Then are we of all men most miserable But stay awhile These things will be all called over again at the Resurrection and that is time enough and all things be put into another posture See 2 Thes. 1. 6 7 8 9 10. We have therefore no reason to despond for what may befall us in this life nor at what distress this flesh we carry about us may be put unto We are it may be sometimes ready to faint or to think much of the pains we put our selves unto in Religious Duties especially when our bodies being weak and crazie would willingly be spared or of what we may endure and undergo but the day is coming that will recompence and make up all This very flesh which we now thus employ under its weaknesses in a constant course of the most difficult duties shall be raised out of the dust purified from all its infirmities freed from all its weaknesses made incorruptible and immortal to enjoy rest and glory unto Eternity And we may comfort our selves with these words 1 Thes. 4. 18. Fourthly The fourth principle mentioned is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is the immediate consequent of the Resurrection of the dead Men shall not be raised again to live another Life in this world and as it were therein to make a new adventure but it is to give an account of what is past and to receive what they have done in the body whether it be good or evil And because there are no outward visible transactions between God and the Souls of men after their departure out of this world nor any alteration to be made as to their Eternal state and condition this Judgement is spoken of as that which immediately succeeds death its self Heb. 9. 27. It is appointed to all men once to dye and after this the Judgement This Judgement is sure and there is nothing between death and it that it takes notice of But as to some there may be a very long space of time between the one and the other neither shall Judgement be administred until after the Resurrection from the dead and by means thereof And when all the race of mankind appointed thereunto have lived and died according to their allotted seasons then shall Judgement ensue on them all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is commonly used for a condemnatory Sentence Therefore some think that it is only the Judgement of wicked and ungodly men that is intended And indeed the day of Judgement is most frequently spoken of in the Scripture with respect thereunto See 2 Thes. 1. 7 8 9 10. Jude 14 15. 2 Pet. 2. 4. And this is partly because the remembrance of it is suited to put an awe upon the fierceness pride and rage of the spirits of men rushing into Sin as the Horse into the battel and partly that it might be a relief unto the godly under all either their persecutions from their cruelty or temptations from their prosperity But in reality the Judgement is general and all men both good and bad must stand in their lot therein We shall all stand before the Judgement-seat of Christ as it is written As I live saith the Lord every knee shall bow to me Rom. 14. 10 11. And this is that which is here intended As the Resurrection of the dead that precedes belongs to all so doth the Judgement that follows And this our Apostle expresseth by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a word of the same original and signification with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Judgement is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the eleventh fundamental Article of the Jewish present Creed Two of the Targums as a supplement of that Speech which they suppose defective 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 4. 8. And Cain said to his brother Abel add a disputation between the Brothers about Eternal Judgement with Rewards and Punishments which they suppose Cain to have denied and Abel to have asserted And as there is no doubt but that it was one principal Article of the Faith of
Aethiopick follows the Syriack some read Illustrati to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vul Lat. Gustaverant etiam donum coeleste etiam for Others express the Article by the Pronoun by reason of its Reduplication Et gustaverint donum illud coeleste and have tasted of that Heavenly Gift Syr. The Gift that is from Heaven And this the Emphasis in the Original seems to require And have tasted of that Heavenly Gift 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et participes facti sunt spiritus sancti Vul. Lat. And are made partakers of the Holy Ghost All others facti fuerint have been made partakers of the Holy Ghost Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Spirit of Holiness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. Lat. Et gustaverunt nihilominus bonum Dei verbum Rhem. Have moreover tasted the good word of God But moreover doth not express nihilominus and have notwithstanding which hath no place here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verbum pulchrum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Virtutesque seculi futuri Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Virtutem the Power Vul. seculi venturi We cannot in our Language distinguish between futurum and venturum and so render it the world to come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. Et prolapsi sunt Rhem. And are fallen Others si prolabantur which the sense requires if they fall that is away as our Translation properly Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That sin again somewhat dangerously for it is one kind of sinning only that is included and expressed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. rursus renovari ad poenitentiam to be renewed again to Repentance rendring the active verb passively So Beza also ut denuo renoventur ad resipiscentiam that they should again be renewed to Repentance The word is active as rendered by ours to renew them again to Repentance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rursum crucifigentes sibimetipsis filium Dei 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. Et ostentui habentes Rhem. And making him a mockery Eras. ludibrio habentes Beza ignominiae exponentes One of late ad exemplum Judaeorum excruciant torment him as did the Jews For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened and have tasted of the Heavenly Gift and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost and have tasted the good word of God and the Powers of the world to come if they fall away for ' any to renew them again to Repentance seeing they crucifie again to themselves the Son of God and put him unto open shame or treat him ignominiously That this passage in our Apostles discourse hath been looked upon as accompanied with great difficulties is known to all And many have the Differences been about its Interpretation For both Doctrinally and Practically sundry have here stumbled and miscarried It is almost generally agreed upon that from these words and the colourable but indeed perverse Interpretation and Application made of them by some in the Primitive times occasioned by the then present circumstances of things to be mentioned afterwards the Latin Church was so backward in receiving the Epistle it self that it had not absolutely prevailed therein in the days of Hierome as we have elsewhere declared Wherefore it is necessary that we should a little enquire into the occasion of the great contests which have been in the Church almost in all Ages about the sense of this place It is known that the Primitive Church according to its Duty was carefully watchful about the Holiness and upright walking of all that were admitted into the Society and Fellowship of it Hence upon every known and visible failing they required an open Repentance from the Offenders before they would admit them into a participation of the sacred mysteries But upon flagitious and scandalous crimes such as Murder Adultery or Idolatry in many Churches they would never admit those who had been guilty of them into their Communion any more Their greatest and most signal trial was with respect unto them who through fear of death complied with the Gentiles in their Idolatrous Worship in the time of Persecution For they had fixed no certain general Rules whereby they should unanimously proceed but every Church exercised severity or lenity according as they saw cause upon the circumstances of particular instances Hence Cyprian in his banishment would not positively determine concerning those of the Church in Carthage who had so sinned and fallen but deferr'd his thoughts until his return when he resolved to advise with the whole Church and settle all things according to the counsel that should be agreed on amongst them Yea many of his Epistles are on this subject peculiarly and in them all if compared together it is evident that there was no Rule agreed upon herein nor was he himself resolved in his own mind though strictly on all occasions opposing Novatianus wherein it had been well if his Arguments had answered his Zeal Before this the Church of Rome was esteemed in particular more remiss in their Discipline and more than other Churches in their re-admission unto Communion of notorious Offenders Hence Tertullian in his Book de Poenitentia reflects on Zepherinus the Bishop of Rome that he had admitted Adulterers unto Repentance and thereby unto the Communion of the Church But that Church proceeding in her Lenity and every day enlarging her Charity Novatus and Novatianus taking offence thereat advanced an Opinion on the contrary extream For they denied all hope of Church-pardon or of a Return unto Ecclesiastical Communion unto them who had fallen into open sin after Baptism and in especial peremptorily excluded all persons whatsoever who had outwardly complied with Idolatrous Worship in time of Persecution without respect unto any distinguishing circumstances Yea they seem to have excluded them from all expectation of forgiveness from God himself But their followers terrified with the uncharitableness and horror of this Perswasion tempered it so far as leaving all persons absolutely to the mercy of God upon their Repentance they only denied such as we mentioned before a re-admission into Church-Communion as Acâ—sius speaks expresly in Socrates lib. 1. cap. 7. Now this Opinion they endeavoured to confirm as from the nature and use of Baptism which was not to be reiterated whereon they judged that no pardon was to be granted unto them who fell into those sins which they lived in before and were cleansed from at their Baptism so principally from this place of our Apostle wherein they thought their whole Opinion was taught and confirmed And so usually doth it fall out very unhappily with men who think they see some peculiar Opinion or Perswasion in some singular Text of Scripture and will not bring their Interpretations of it unto the Analogie of Faith whereby they might see how contrary it is to the whole design and current of the word in other places But the Church of Rome on the other side judging rightly from other directions given in the Scripture that the Novatians transgressed the Rule
of Righteousness is he who is the Author Cause and Dispenser of Righteousness unto others As God is said to be the Lord our Righteousness And so is the King of Peace also in which sence God is called the God of Peace Thus was it with Melchisedec as he was the Representative of Jesus Christ. 4. The last thing that the Apostle Observes from these Names and Titles in their Order wherein it is Natural that the Name of a Man should precede the Title of his Rule First King of Righteousness and afterwards King of Peace Righteousness must go first and then Peace will follow after So it is Promised of Christ and his Kingdom that in his days the Righteous shall flourish and abundance of Peace so long as the Moon endureth Psal. 72. 7. First they are made Righteous and then they have Peace And Isa. 32. 17. The work of Righteousness shall be Peace and the effect of Righteousness Quietness and Peace for ever This is the Order of these things There is no Peace but what proceedeth from and is the Effect of Righteousness So these things with respect unto Christ are declared by the Psalmist Psal. 85. 9 10 11 12 13. What we are taught hence is 1. That the Lord Jesus Christ is the only King of Righteousness and Peace unto the Church See Isa. 32. 1 21. Chap. 9. 6. He is not only a Righteous and Peaceable King as were his Types Melchisedec and Solomon but he is the Author Cause Procurer and Dispenser of Righteousness and Peace to the Church So is it declared Jer. 23. 5 6. Behold the Days come saith the Lord that I will raise unto David a Righteous Branch and a King shall Reign and Prosper and shall Execute Judgment and Justice in the Earth In his Days Judah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is his Name whereby he shall be called The Lord our Righteousness He is Righteous and Reigneth Righteously but this is not all he is the Lord our Righteousness VII The Apostle proceeds yet unto other Instances in the Description of Melchisedec wherein he was made like unto the Son of God ver 3. Without Father without Mother without Descent having neither beginning of Days nor end of Life The things here asserted being at the first view strange and uncouth would administer occasion unto large Discourses and accordingly have been the Subject of many Enquiries and Conjectures But it is no way unto the Edification of those who are Sober and Godly to engage into any long Disputes about those things wherein all Learned sober Expositors are come to an Issue and Agreement as they are in general in this matter For it is granted that Melchisedec was a Man really and truly so and therefore of Necessity must have all these things for the Nature of Man after him who was first Created who yet also had beginning of Life and end of Days doth not exist without them Wherefore these things are not denied of him absolutely but in some sence and with respect unto some especial end Now this is with respect unto his Office therein or as he bare that Office he was without Father without Mother c. And how doth this appear that so it was with him It doth so because none of them is Recorded or mentioned in the Scripture which yet diligently Recordeth them concerning other Persons and in particular those who could not find and prove their Genealogies were by no means to be admitted unto the Priesthood Ezra 2. 61 62 63. And we may therefore by this Rule enquire into the particulars 1. It is said of him in the first place that he was without Father without Mother whereon part of the latter clause namely without beginning of Days doth depend But how could a Mortal Man come into the World without Father or Mother Man that is Born of a Woman is the Description of every Man what therefore can be intended The next word declares he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without Descent say we But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Generation a Descent a Pedigree not absolutely but Rehearsed Described Recorded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is he whose Stock and Descent is entered upon Record And so on the contrary 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not he who hath no Descent no Genealogy but he whose Descent and Pedigree is no where Entered Recorded Reckoned up Thus the Apostle himself plainly expresseth this word ver 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whose Descent is not counted that is reckoned up in Record Thus was Melchisedec without Father and Mother in that the Spirit of God who so strictly and exactly Recorded the Genealogies of other Patriarchs and Types of Christ and that for no less an end than to manifest the Truth and Faithfulness of God in his Promises speaks nothing unto this purpose concerning him He is introduced as it were one falling from Heaven appearing on a sudden Reigning in Salem and Officiating the Office of the Priesthood unto the High God 2. On the same Account is he said to be without beginning of Days or end of Life For as he was a Mortal Man he had both He was assuredly Born and did no less certainly dye than other Men. But neither of these are Recorded concerning him We have no more to do with him to learn from him nor are concerned in him but only as he is Described in the Scripture and there is no mention therein of the Beginning of his Days or the end of his Life Whatever therefore he might have in himself he had none to us Consider all the other Patriarchs mentioned in the Writings of Moses and you shall find their Descent Recorded who was their Father and so upwards unto the first man and not only so but the time of their Birth and Death the Beginning of their Days and the End of their Lives is exactly Recorded For it is constantly said of them such an one Lived so long and begat such a Son which fixed the time of Birth Then of him so begotten it is said he lived so many Years which determines the end of his Days These things are expressely Recorded But concerning Melchisedec none of these things are spoken No mention is made of Father or Mother no Genealogy is Recorded of what Stock or Progeny he was nor is there any Account of his Birth or Death So that all these things are wanting unto him in this Historical Narration wherein our Faith and Knowledge is alone concerned Some few things may yet farther be enquired into for the clearing of the sence of these words 1. Whereas the Observation of the Apostle is built upon the silence of Moses in the History which was sufficient for him whatever was the Cause and Reason of that silence we may enquire whence it was Whence it was I say that Moses should introduce so great and excellent a Person as Melchisedec without any mention of his Race or Stock of his
Interest in the Priesthood as it was Established by Law 2. He had no Genealogy upon the Priestly Line And that which is Recorded of him on other accounts is so far from having respect unto his Right unto the Priesthood of the Law that it directly proves and demonstrates that he had none For his Genealogy is evidently of the Tribe of Judah which was excluded Legally from that Office as we have besides the Institution an Instance in King Uzziah 2 Chron. 26. 16 17 18. from Exod. 30. 7. Numb 18. 7. Hence our Apostle concludes That had he been on the Earth that is under the Order of the Law he could not have been a Priest there being others who by virtue of their Descent had alone the Right thereunto Heb. 8. 3 4. Wherefore God in these things Instructed the Church that he would erect a Priesthood which should no way depend on Natural Generation Descent or Genealogy whence it inevitably follows that the state of the Priesthood under the Law was to cease and to give place unto another which our Apostle principally designs to prove 3. In this respect also the Lord Christ was without Beginning of Days and End of Life For although in his Humane Nature he was both Born and Died yet he had a Priesthood which had no such Beginning of Days as that it should be traduced from any other to him nor shall ever cease or be delivered over from him unto any other but abides unto the consummation of all things In these things was Melchisedec made like unto Christ whom the Apostle here calls the Son of God made like unto the Son of God I have formerly observed in this Epistle that the Apostle makes mention of the Lord Christ under various Appellations on various Occasions so that in one place or another he makes Use of all the Names whereby he is signified in the Scripture Here he calls him the Son of God and that 1. To intimate that although Melchisedec were an Excellent Person yet was he infinitely beneath him whom he Represented even the Son of God He was not the Son of God but he had the Honour in so many things to be made like unto him 2. To declare how all these things which were any way Represented in Melchisedec or couched in the Story or left unto Enquiry by the vail of silence drawn over them could be fulfilled in our High Priest And it was from hence namely that he was the Son of God By virtue hereof was he capable of an always-living abiding uninterrupted Priesthood although as to his Humane Nature he once died in the Discharge of that Office This Description being given of the Person treated of which makes up the Subject of the Proposition it is affirmed concerning him that he abideth a Priest for ever For any thing we find in the Story of his Death or the Resignation of his Office or the Succession of any one unto him therein he abideth a Priest for ever Some I find have been venturing at some obscure Conjectures of the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Melchisedec in Heaven But I cannot perceive that they well understood themselves what they intended Nor did they consider that the real continuance of the Priesthood for ever in the Person of Melchisedec is as inconsistent with the Priesthood of Christ as the continuance of the same Office in the Line of Aaron But things are so related concerning him in the Scripture as that there is no mention of the ending of the Priesthood of his Order nor of his own Personal Administration of his Office by Death or otherwise Hence is he said to abide a Priest for ever This was that which our Apostle principally designed to confirm from hence namely that there was in the Scripture before the Institution of the Aaronical Priesthood a Representation of an Eternal unchangeable Priesthood to be introduced in the Church which he demonstrates to be that of Jesus Christ. It may not be amiss in the close of this Exposition of these Verses summarily to represent the several particulars wherein the Apostle would have us to observe the likeness between Melchisedec and Christ or rather the especial Excellencies and Properties of Christ that were Represented in the Account given of the Name Reign Person and Office of Melchisedec As 1. He was said to be and he really was and he only first the King of Righteousness and then the King of Peace seeing he alone brought in Everlasting Righteousness and made Peace with God for Sinners And in his Kingdom alone are these things to be found 2. He was really and truly the Priest of the High God and properly he was so alone He offered that Sacrifice and made that Attonement which was signified by all the Sacrifices Offered by Holy Men from the Foundation of the World 3. He Blesseth all the Faithful as Abraham the Father of the Faithful was Blessed by Melchisedec In him were they to be Blessed by him are they Blessed through him delivered from the Curse and all the Fruits of it nor are they Partakers of any Blessing but from him 4. He receiveth all the Homage of his People all their grateful Acknowledgments of the Love and Favour of God in the Conquest of their Spiritual Adversaries and Deliverance from them as Melchisedec received the Tenth of the Spoils from Abraham 5. He was really without Progenitors or Predecessors unto his Office nor would I exclude that Mystical sence from the intention of the place that he was without Father as to his Humane Nature and without Mother as to his Divine 6. He was a Priest without Genealogy or Derivation of his Pedigree from the Loyns of Aaron or any other that ever was a Priest in the World and moreover Mysteriously was of a Generation which none can declare 7. He had in his Divine Person as the High Priest of the Church neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life as no such thing is reported of Melchisedec For the Death which he underwent in the Discharge of his Office being not the death of his whole Person but of his Humane Nature only no Interruption of his endless Office did ensue thereon For although the Person of the Son of God died whence God is said to Redeem his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. yet he died not in his whole Person But as the Son of man was in Heaven whilst he was speaking on the Earth John 3. 13. namely he was so in his Divine Nature so whilst he was dead in the Earth in his Humane Nature the same Person was alive in his Divine Absolutely therefore nor in respect of his Office he had neither Beginning of Days nor end of Life 8. He was really the Son of God as Melchisedec in many Circumstances was made like to the Son of God 9. He alone abideth a Priest for ever whereof we must particularly treat afterwards The Doctrinal Observations that may be taken from these Verses
all 2. Important Truths should be strongly Confirmed Such is that here pleaded by the Apostle and therefore doth he so labour in the Confirmation of it He had undertaken to convince the Hebrews of the Cessation of their Legal Worship out of their own acknowledged Principles He deals not with them meerly by his Apostolical Authority and by vertue of the Divine Revelations of the will of God which himself had received but he proceeds with them on Arguments taken out of the Types Institutions and Testimonies of the Old Testament all which they owned and acknowledged though without his aid they had not understood the meaning of them On this Supposition it was necessary for him to Plead and Press all the Arguments from the Topick mentioned which had any Cogency in them and he doth so accordingly 3. Arguments that are equally true may yet on the Account of Evidence not be equally Cogent yet 4. In the Confirmation of the Truth we may use every help that is true and seasonable though some of them may be more effectual unto our End than others This we are instructed in by the Apostle affirming in this place that what he now affirms is yet far more Evident And this Evidence as we observed before may respect either the things themselves or the Efficacy in point of Argument For in themselves all things under the old Testament were Typical and Significant of what was afterwards to be introduced So our Apostle tells us that the Ministry of Moses consisted in giving Testimony to those things which were to be spoken or declared afterwards chap. 3. 5. But among them some were far more Clear and Evident as to their signification than others were In the latter sense the things which he had discoursed about Melchisedec and his Priesthood were more effectually demonstrative of the Change of the Levitical Priesthood than what he had newly observed concerning the Rising of our Lord Jesus Christ not of the Tribe of Levi but of Judah although that had life and evidence also in it self which is principally intended The Argument it self is nextly expressed whereunto this full Evidence is ascribed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if another Priest do arise after the Similitude of Melchisedec And in the words there is 1 the Modification of the Proposition in the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 The Notation of the Subject spoken of another Priest 3 His Introduction into his Office he did arise 4 The Nature of his Office and the manner of his coming unto it after the likeness of Melchisedec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if is generally taken here not to be a Conditional but a Causal Conjunction And so as many judge it is used Rom. 8. 31. 2 Cor. 5. 15. 1 Thess. 3. 8. 1 Pet. 1. 17. And it is rendered in our Translation by For For that another Priest as Beza rendreth it by quod because Others by ex eo quòd and siquidem Syr. and again this is more known by that which he said All take it to be an intimation of a Reason proving what is affirmed and so it doth if with the Vulgar we retain si or siquidem if so be And it is yet far more Evident if so be that another Priest As to the Argument in general we must observe 1 That the Design of the Apostle in this place is not to demonstrate the Dignity and Eminency of the Priesthood of Christ from that of Melchisedec his Type which he had done before sufficiently he doth not produce the same Words and Arguments again unto the same purpose but that which he aims at is from that Testimony whereby he had proved the Dignity of the Priesthood of Christ now also to prove the necessary Abolition of the Levitical Priesthood Wherefore 2 He doth not insist on the whole of the Testimony before pleaded but only on that one thing of another Priest necessarily included therein 2. The Subject spoken of is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is not meerly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 alius as the Syriack understood it who renders it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 alienus that is intended Every 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was by the Law absolutely forbidden to approach unto the Priests Office or Altar or Sacred employment So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another in this Case is a Stranger one that is not of the House or Family of Aaron And nothing can be more evident than that the Levitical Priesthood and the whole Law of Divine Worship must be taken away and abolished then if it appear that any 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Stranger may be admitted into that Office much more if it were necessary that it should so be For the Law of the Priesthood took care of nothing more than that no Stranger that was not of the House of Aaron should be called to that Office See Exod. 29. 33. Lev. 22. 10. Numb 1. 51. and Numb 3. 10. Aaron and his Sons they shall wait on the Preists Office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Stranger that cometh nigh that is to discharge any Sacerdotal Duty shall be put to death And God gave an eminent Instance of his Severity with respect unto this Law in the Punishment of Corah though of the Tribe of Levi for the Transgression of it And he caused a perpetual Memorial to be kept of that Punishment to the End they might know that no Stranger who is not of the Seed of Aaron should come near to Offer Incense before the Lord Numb 16. 40. And hence our Apostle in the next verse observes that this Priest was not to be made after the Law of a Carnal Commandement seeing his making was a Dissolution of that Law or Commandement If therefore there must be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another Priest that was not of the linage of Aaron the other is abolished 3. His Introduction into his Office is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there ariseth Oritur Exoritur Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Surgit Vul. Lat. exurgat Arose in an extraordinary manner Judg. 5. 7. Untill I Deborah arose I arose a Mother in Israel that is by an extraordinary Call from God to be a Prophetess and a Deliverer Deut. 18. 18. A Prophet will I raise up unto you which was Christ himself So God raised up a Horn of Salvation in the house of his Servant David Luk. 1. 69. that is with an extraordinary Power and Glory So was this Priest to arise not springing out of nor succeeding in any order of Priesthood before Established But all things in the Law lay against his Introduction and the Body of the People in the Church was come unto the highest Defiance of any such Priest But as God had fore-signified what he would do when the time of the Reformation of all things should come so when he performed his Word herein he did it in that manner with that
moment of his being a Priest he abode so alwaies without interruption or intermission This is the meaning of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He in his own Person abideth Nor doth the Apostle say that he did not dye but only that he abideth alwaies 3. It followeth from hence that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood A Priesthood subject to no change or alteration that cannot pass away But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sacerdotium successivum per successionem ab uno alteri traditum Such a Priesthood as which when one hath attained it abideth not with him but he delivereth over unto another as Aaron did his unto Eleazar his Son or it falls unto another by some Right or Law of Succession A Priesthood that goes from hand to hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Priesthood that doth not passe from one unto another And this the Apostle seems directly to intend as is evident from the Antithesis The Priests after the Order of Aaron were many and that by reason of death Wherefore it was necessary that their Priesthood should pass from one to another by Succession So that when one received it he that went before him ceased to be a Priest And so it was either the Predecessors were taken off by death or on any other just occasion as it was in the case of Abiathar who was put from the Priests Office by Solomon 1 King 2. 27. How beit our Apostle mentions their going off by death only because that was the ordinary way and which was provided for in the Law With the Lord Christ it was otherwise He received his Priesthood from none Although he had sundry Types yet he had no Predecessor And he hath none to succeed him nor can have any added or joyned unto him in his Office The whole office of the Priesthood of the Covenant and the entire administration of it are confined unto his Person There are no more that follow him than went before him The Expositors of the Roman Church are greatly perplexed in the reconciling of this Passage of the Apostle unto the present Priesthood of their Church And they may well be so seeing they are undoubtedly irreconcileable Some of them say that Peter succeeded unto Christ in his Priesthood as Eleazar did unto Aaron So Ribera some of them deny that he hath any Successor properly so called Successorem non habet nec it a quisquam Catholicus loquitur si bene circumspectè loqui velit saith Estius But it is openly evident that some of them are not so circumspect as Estius would have them but do plainly affirm that Peter was Christs Successor A Lapide indeed affirms that Peter did not succeed unto Christ as Eleazar did unto Aaron because Eleazar had the Priesthood in the same degree and dignity with Aaron and so had not Peter with Christ. But yet that he had the same Priesthood with him a Priesthood of the same kind he doth not deny That which they generally fix upon is that their Priests have not another Priesthood or offer another Sacrifice but are Partakers of his Priesthood and minister under him and so are not his Successors but his Vicars which I think is the worst composure of this difficulty they could have thought upon For 1. This is directly contrary unto the words and design of the Apostle For the Reason he assigns why the Priesthood of Christ doth not passe from him unto any other is because he abides himself for ever to discharge the Office of it Now this excludes all subordination and conjunction all Vicars as well as Successors unless we shall suppose that although he doth thus abide yet is he one way or other disabled to discharge his Office 2. The Successors of Aaron had no more another Priesthood but what he had than it is pretended that the Roman Priests have no other Priesthood but what Christ had Nor did they offer any other Sacrifice than what he offered as these Priests pretend to offer the same Sacrifice that Christ did So that still the case is the same between Aaron and his Successors and Christ and his Substitutes 3. They say that Christ may have Substitutes in his Office though he abide a Priest still and although the office still continue the same unchangeable So God in the Government of the world makes use of Judges and Magistrates yet is himself the Supreme Rector of all But this Pretence is vain also For they do not substitute their Priests unto him in that which he continueth to do himself but in that which he doth not which he did indeed and as a Priest ought to do but now ceaseth to do for ever in his own Person For the principal Act of the Sacerdotal Office of Christ consisted in his Oblation or his offering himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God This he did once and ceaseth for ever from doing so any more But these Priests are assigned to offer him in Sacrifice every day as partakers of the same Priesthood with him which is indeed not to be his Substitutes but his Successors and to take his Office out of his hand as if he were dead and could henceforth discharge it no more For they do not appoint Priests to intercede in his room because they grant he continueth himself so to do but to offer Sacrifice in his stead because he doth so no more Wherefore if that be an Act of Priesthood and of their Priesthood as is pretended it is unavoidable that his Priesthood is passed from him unto them Now this is a blasphemous Imagination and directly contrary both unto the words of the Apostle and the whole Design of his Argument Nay it would lay the advantage on the other side For the Priests of the Order of Aaron had that Priviledge that none could take their Office upon them nor officiate in it whilst they were alive But although Christ abideth for ever yet according unto the sense of these men and their practice thereon he stands in need of others to officiate for him and that in the principal part of his Duty and Office For Offer himself in Sacrifice unto God he neither now doth nor can seeing henceforth he dieth no more This is the work of the Mass-Priests alone who must therefore be honoured as Christs Successors or be abhorred as his Murderers for the Sacrifice of him must be by blood and death The Argument of the Apostle as it is exclusive of this Imagination so it is cogent unto his purpose For so he proceedeth That Priesthood which changeth not but is alwaies vested in the same Person and in him alone is more excellent than that which was subject to change continually from one hand unto another For that Transmission of it from one unto another was an effect of weakness and Imperfection And the Jews grant that the frequency of their change under the second Temple was a Token of Gods displeasure But thus it was with the Priesthood of
Christ which never changeth and that of Aaron which was alwaies in a transient Succession And the Reasons he gives of this contrary state of these two Priesthoods do greatly enforce the Argument For the first Priesthood was so Successive because the Priests themselves were obnoxious unto death the sum and issue of all weaknesses and infirmities But as to the Lord Christ his Priesthood is perpetual and unchangeable because he abideth personally for ever being made a Priest according to the Power of an endless Life which is the sum of all Perfections that our nature is capable of And we may observe 1. The perpetuity of the Priesthood of Christ depends on his own perpetual Life He did not undertake any Office for the Church to lay it aside whilst he lives until the whole Design and work of it be accomplished And therefore he tells his Disciples that because he liveth they shall live also John 14. 19. For whilst he lives he will take care of them But this must be spoken unto on the next verse 2. The perpetuity of the Priesthood of Christ as unchangeably exercised in his own Person is a principal part of the Glory of that Office His discharge of this Office for the Church in his own Person throughout all Generations is the glory of it 1. Hereon depends the Churches preservation and stability There is neither a ceasing nor any the least intermission of that Care and Providence of such interposition with God on its behalf which are required thereunto Our High Priest is continually ready to appear and put in for us on all occasions And his abiding for ever manifests the continuance of the same Care and Love for us that he ever had The same Love wherewith as our High Priest he laid down his Life for us doth still continue in him And every one may with the same confidence go unto him with all their concerns as poor diseased and distempered Persons went unto him when he was upon Earth when he never shewed greater displeasure than unto those who forbad any to come unto him whatever their pretences were 2. Hereon depends the Union and Communion of the Church with it self in all successive Generations For whereas he who is their Head and High Priest in whom they all center as unto their Union and Communion and who hath all their Graces and Duties in his hand to present them unto God they have a Relation unto each other and a concernment in one another VVe that are alive in this generation have Communion with all those that died in the Faith before us as shall be declared if God will on Chap. 12. ver 22 23 24. And they were concerned in us as we are also in the generations that are to come For all the Prayers of the Church from first to last are lodged in the hand of the same High Priest who abides for ever And he returns the prayers of one Generation unto another VVe enjoy the fruits of the Prayers Obedience and Blood of those that went before us and if we are faithful in our generation serving the VVill of God those shall enjoy the fruits of ours who shall come after us Our joynt interest in this our abiding Priest gives a line of Communication unto all Believers in all Generations And 3. the Consolation of the Church also depends hereon Do we meet with Troubles Trials Difficulties Temptations and Distresses hath not the Church done so in former Ages What do we think of those days wherein Prisons Tortures Swords and Flames were the Portion of the Church all the world over But did any of them miscarry Was any one true Believer lost for ever And did not the whole Church prove victorious in the End Did not Satan rage and the World gnash their Teeth to see themselves conquered and their power broken by the Faith Patience and Suffering of them whom they hated and despised And was it from their own wisdom and courage that they were so preserved Did they overcome meerly by their own Blood or were delivered by their own Power No but all their preservation and successe their deliverance and eternal Salvation depended meerly on the care and power of their merciful High Priest It was through his Blood the Blood of the Lamb or the efficacy of his Sacrifice that they overcame their Adversaries Revel 12. 11. By the same blood were their Robes washed and made white Chap. 7. 14. From thence had they their Righteousness in all their Sufferings And by him had the Church its triumphant issue out of all its Trials Now is he not the same that he ever was vested with the same Office and hath he not the same Qualifications of Love Compassion Care and Power for the discharge of it as he always had whence then can any just cause of despondence in any Trials or Temptations arise We have the same High Priest to take care of us to assist and help us as they had who were all of them finally victorious 4. This gives perpetual efficacy unto his sacrifices c. 3. The Addition of sacrificing Priests as Vicars of or Substitutes unto Christ in the discharge of his Office destroys his Priesthood as to the principal eminency of it above that of the Levitical Priesthood VER 25. Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him seeing he ever liveth to make Intercession for them IN this verse the Apostle brings his whole preceding Mysterious discourse unto an Issue in the Application of it unto the Faith and Comfort of the Church It was not his Design meerly to open Mysterious Truths in the notion of them Nor only to prove the Glory and preeminence of the Gospel Church state above that of the same Church under Mosaical Institutions on the Account of the Priesthood of Christ But his principal Design was to demonstrate the Spiritual and Eternal Advantages of all true Believers by these things The sum of what he intends he proposeth in this verse and afterwards enlargeth on unto the end of the Chapter What Believers ought to seek in and what they may expect from this blessed glorious Priesthood is that which he now undertakes to declare In like manner on all occasions he manifests that the end of God in the whole Mystery of his Grace by Jesus Christ and Institutions of the Gospel is the Salvation of his Elect unto the praise of the Glory of his Grace There are in the words 1. The Illative Conjunction or note of Inference Wherefore 2. An Ascription of Power unto this High Priest He is able 3. The end of that Power or the effect of it it is to save which is farther described 1. By the extent of it it is unto the uttermost 2. The especial Object of it Those that come to God by him 4. The Reasons of the whole which are 1. His perpetual life 2. His perpetual work He ever liveth to make Intercession for them The
Oblation of himself on the Cross or he was never any nor needed so to be nor could he so be for after he was freed from death he had nothing to offer And it is a strange order of things that the Lord Christ should first offer his onely Sacrifice and after that be made a Priest But the Order Time and manner of the Call and Consecration of the Lord Christ unto his Priesthood I have elsewhere declared Wherefore 4. We may observe that all these Qualifications of our High Priest were peculiarly necessary on the account of the Sacrifice which he had to offer They were not only necessary for him as he was to be the Sacrificer but also as he was to be the Sacrifice not only as he was to be the Priest but as he was to be the Lamb. For the Sacrifices were to be without blemish as well as the Sacrificers So were we redeemed with the precious blood of Christ as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot 1 Pet. 1. 19. But however the Sacrifices were chosen under the Law without blemish yet were they still in their own nature but Calves and Goats and Lambs And therefore Priests who had weaknesses and infirmities and sins of their own might be meet enough to offer them But here both Priest and Sacrifice were to be equally pure and holy 5. We must not pass by the wresting of this Text by the Socinians nor omit its due Vindication For they contend that this whole Description of our High Priest doth not respect his internal Qualifications in this world before and in the offering of himself by his Blood but his glorious state and condition in Heaven For they fear as well they may that if the Qualifications of a Priest were necessary to him and required in him whilst he was in this world that then he was so indeed He who says such an High Priest became us as is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners doth affirm that when he was so he was our High Priest In that state wherein these things were necessary unto him he was a Priest To avoid this ruine unto their Pretensions they offer violence unto the Text and the signification of every word in it and dangerously insinuate a negation of the things intended to be in Christ in this world So speaks Schlictingius on the place Unde apparet sequentibus verbis seu Epithetis Christo tributis non mores ipsius seu vitam ab omni peccati labe puram sed felicem ac beatum statum describi ac designari ob quem fiat ut in aeternum vivens nostri quoque perpetuam gerat curam Licet enim omnia ista ratione vitae morum de Christo intellecta verissima sint tamen nihil ad praesens Authoris institutum faciunt So also argues Smalcius de Reg. Christi Cap. 23. whom we have elsewhere refuted The Paraphrase of one of our own seems to comply herewith which is as followeth And this was a sort of High Priests which we sinful weak creatures had need of which by the way I do not understand for we stood not in need of a new sort of High Priests but of one single individual High Priest One that being mercifully disposed is also incapable of suffering any hurt of being defiled or corrupted and consequently of dying and to that end is exalted unto a pitch above our sinful corruptible condition here So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are rendred in the Margin free from evil and undefileable The sense is plainly the same with that of Schlictingius though there be some variety in the expressions of the one and the other And therefore is Christ said to be exalted that he might be such as he is here described as though he was not so before in the sense here intended by the Apostle however the words here in another sense might be applyed unto him Three things seem to be aymed at in this Exposition 1. To make way for another corrupt notion on the next verse wherein these men with Grotius would have Christ in some sense offer for his own sins also which there can be no pretence for if these things be asscribed unto him as he was a Priest in this world 2. To take care that the Innocency Holinesse and absolute Purity of our High Priest be not supposed to be necessary unto our Justification neither as the material nor formal cause of it For if the Lord Christ in the Sacrifice of himself died for our Justification and that he might do so it was necessary that he should antecedently be holy harmless undefiled and separate from sinners then was his being so necessary unto our Justification as a cause thereof 3. To obviate an Apprehension of his being an High Priest before his death and to have offered his one Sacrifice therein For if he had not the Qualifications necessary unto an High Priest before his Ascension into Heaven he could not be so before But these things are none of them compliant with the Truth And 1. This Exposition is contrary to the concurrent sense of all sober antient and modern Expositors And which is more it is contrary to the common sense of all Christians Not one of them who knoweth ought of these things unless their minds are perverted with these mens glosses and that meerly to comply with other opinions wherein the text is no way concerned but that in their first and last consideration of these words they respect Jesus Christ as to his personal Holiness in this World And that Exposition had need be well confirmed which is not only contrary to the Judgement of all learned men but also destructive of the common Faith of Christians But as yet we have nothing beyond crude Assertions offered in the proof of it 2. It is contrary unto or inconsistent with the sense and use of the Words in all good Authors sacred and prophane and contrary unto the Application of them unto the Lord Christ in other places of the Scripture as we shall see immediately 3. It is contrary to the order of the Apostles words For he placeth all these Properties as qualifications of this Person antecedently unto his Exaltation He was first Holy Harmless Undefiled and then made Higher than the Heavens But according unto this Exposition his being made higher than the Heavens is the antecedent cause of his being made Holy c. 4. It is highly false that the blessed state pretended to be here set forth was antecedently unto his being a Priest and the sacrifice which he offered yea such an estate was inconsistent with the Oblation of himself For he offered himself unto God in his Blood Heb. 9. 14. and that with strong cryes and tears Chap. 5. 7. which were inconsistent with such a state for it is so described on purpose to be exclusive of every thing required thereunto 5. Schlictingius pleads that although all these things were true with
unto God when he offered himself not to expiate his own infirmities by his offering but that he might be carried through and supported in his Oblation which he offered for the sins of the People and had success therein See the exposition on chap. 5. 7. 5. He is more kind than ordinary in extending the Oblation of Christ unto his death also But he recalls his grant affirming that he did only prepare himself for his offering thereby And this also casts his whole Exposition into much confusion Christ offered himself once saith the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 once and at one time This I suppose is agreed Then he offered for himself and his own sins or not at all For he offered but once and at one time Where then did he thus offer himself and when In Heaven upon his Ascension say the Socinians with one accord Where then and when did he offer for himself On the earth Then he offered himself twice No by no means he offered not himself on the Earth how then did he offer for himself on the earth He did not indeed offer himself on the Earth but he prepared himself for his offering on the Earth and therein he offered for himself that is he did and he did not offer himself upon the earth For they cannot evade by saying that he did it when he offered up prayers on the Earth For the Apostle says expresly in this place that what he did he did it when he offered himself And it must be by such an offering as answered the offering of the high Priest for himself which was bloody 6. The close of his Discourse whereby he would prove the Truth of his Exposition of the verse foregoing from his Interpretation of this is absurd as that which would give countenance unto an evident falsehood from what is more evidently so Grotius adds little unto what Schlictingius offers in this case Only he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken for those griefs which are commonly the punishment of sin Rom. 6. 10. But it is a mistake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place signifies nothing but the Guilt of Sin which Christ died to expiate and take away He died once for sin that is he suffered once for sin He says moreover that profluvium mulierum is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Levit. 12. 8. 15. 13. as also is the leprosie chap. 14. 13. But herein also he is mistaken both the one and the other subject unto those defiling Distempers were appointed to offer a sin-offering for those sins which those Defilements were tokens of and the sin of Nature which they proceed from Again he says that Christ in his offering was freed from those infirmities and miseries per mortem acceleratam But his death was not hasted one moment until all was finished nor did he offer for the hastening of his Death And his ensuing words are most ambiguous Christ offered pro doloribus istis qui solent peccatorum poenae esse quos Christus occasione etiam peccatorum humani generis toleravit If the sorrows intended were not true punishments of sin they could not be offered for And what sorrows Christ underwent so far as they were penal he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People and not otherwise But those which are called his own sins must be every way distinct from the sins of the People and have no Relation unto them as the sins of the High Priests of old had not Wherefore if by the occasion of the sins of men he intend that his Sufferings and Griefs were for the sins of men then he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People when he bare our sins and sorrows and had no need to offer distinctly for them as his own And if it were a sorrow that was not for sin it cannot be called Sin Christs sufferings on the occasion of the sins of mankind is well understood by those who are any way skilled in the Socinian Mysteries Hammond says the same He both saith he offered for himself that is made expiation as it were not to deliver himself from sin for he was never guilty of any but from the infirmities assumed by him but especially from death it self and so is now never likely to dye and to determine his Melchisedecian Priesthood Ans. 1 To make expiation as it were from the infirmities assumed by him or to be delivered from them is hard to be understood 2 Much more is it how by death wherein he offered himself he should make expiation to be delivered from death it self 3 And it is as hard to say that Christ offered for himself once by death that he might dye no more seeing it is appointed unto all men only once to dye I have digressed thus far to crush this novel Invention which as it is untrue and alien from the sense of the Apostle so it hath in the expression of it an ungrateful sound of Impiety But I expect not so much Sobriety as that considering the means of its conveyance unto the minds of men at present it should not be vented again until what hath been here pleaded in its confutation be answered At present I shall proceed with the Exposition of the remainder of the words How and what Christ offered for the sins of the People is declared in the words remaining 1. For the way or manner of it He did it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Once only This is directly opposed unto the frequency of the legal Sacrifices repeated daily as there was occasion Those High Priests offered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 daily on all occasions He 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Once only And I cannot but observe by the way that this Assertion of the Apostle is no less absolutely exclusive of the Missatical Sacrifices of the Priests of the Roman Church than it is of the Levitical Sacrifices of the High Priest of the Church of the Jews Their Expositors on this place do generally affirm in plea for their Church that they offer it not to make expiation of sins but only to represent and make application of the one Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross. But in their Mass it self they speak otherwise and expresly offer it to God a Sacrifice for the sins of the living and the dead Neither yet do we enquire unto what End they do what they do and this is all they say that they offer the same sacrifice that Christ did that is himself And this they do a thousand times more frequently than the Expiatory Sacrifices were among the Jews Neither were their Sacrifices offered properly by Gods Appointment to make Attonement for Sin by their own vertue and Efficacy but only to be a Representation and Application of the Sacrifice of Christ to come Whatever ends they therefore fancy unto themselves by pretending to offer the same sacrifice that Christ did they contradict the words of the Apostle and wholly
cause God saw it necessary and it pleased him to put a grievous and heavy yoke upon them to subdue the pride of their spirits and to cause them to breathe after deliverance This the Apostle Peter calls a yoke that neither they nor their Fathers were able to bear Acts 15. 20. that is with peace ease and rest which therefore the Lord Christ invited them to seek for in himself alone Matth. 11. 29 30. And this yoke that God put on them consisted in these three things 1. In a multitude of Precepts hard to be understood and difficult to be observed The present Jews reckon up 613 of them about the sense of most of which they dispute endlesly among themselves But the truth is since the days of the Pharisees they have increased their own yoke and made obedience unto their Law in any tolerable manner altogether unpracticable It were easie to manifest for instance that no man under Heaven ever did or ever can keep the Sabbath according to the Rules they give about it in their Talmuds And they generally scarce observe one of them themselves But in the Law as given by God himself it is certain that there were a multitude of arbitrary Precepts and those in themselves not accompanied with any spiritual Advantages as our Apostle shews Chap. 9. 5. only they were obliged to perform them by a meer soveraign Act of Power and Authority 2. In the severity wherewith the observance of all those Precepts were enjoined them And this was the threatning of death For he that despised Moses 's Law died without mercy and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward Hence was their complaint of old Behold we die we perish we all perish whosoever cometh near unto the Tabernacle of the Lord shall dye shall we be consumed with dying Numb 17. 12 13. And the Curse solemnly denounced against every one that confirmed not all things written in the Law was continually before them 3. In a Spirit of Bondage unto Fear This was administred in the giving and dispensation of the Law even as a Spirit of Liberty and Power is administred in and by the Gospel And as this respected their present Obedience and manner of its performance so in particular it regarded Death not yet conquered by Christ. Hence our Apostle affirms that through fear of Death they were all their life-life-time subject unto Bondage This state God brought them into partly to subdue the pride of their hearts trusting in their own righteousness and partly to cause them to look out earnestly after the promised Deliverer 4. Into this estate and condition God brought them by a Solemn Covenant confirmed by mutual consent between him and them The Tenure Force and Solemn Ratification of this Covenant is expressed Exod. 24. 3 4 5 6 7 8. Unto the terms and conditions of this Covenant was the whole Church obliged indispensibly on pain of Extermination until all was accomplished Mal. 4. 4 5 6. Unto this Covenant belonged the Decalogue with all Precepts of Moral Obedience thence educed So also did the Laws of Political Rule established among them and the whole Systeme of Religious Worship given unto them All these Laws were brought within the verge of this Covenant and were the matter of it And it had especial Promises and Threatnings annexed unto it as such whereof none did exceed the Bounds of the Land of Canaan For even many of the Laws of it were such as obliged no where else Such was the Law of the Sabbatical year and all their Sacrifices There was Sin and Obedience in them or about them in the Land of Canaan none elsewhere Hence 5. This Covenant thus made with these Ends and Promises did never save nor condemn any man eternally All that lived under the Administration of it did attain eternal life or perished for ever but not by vertue of this Covenant as formally such It did indeed revive the commanding Power and Sanction of the first Covenant of Works and therein as the Apostle speaks was the Ministry of condemnation 2 Cor. 3. 9. For by the deeds of the Law can no flesh be justified And on the other hand it directed also unto the Promise which was the instrument of life and salvation unto all that did believe But as unto what it had of its own it was confined unto things temporal Believers were saved under it but not by vertue of it Sinners perished eternally under it but by the Curse of the original Law of Works And 6. Hereon occasionally fell out the ruine of that People their Table became a snare unto them and that which should have been for their welfare became a trap according to the Prediction of our Saviour Psal. 69. 22. It was this Covenant that raised and ruined them it raised them to Glory and Honour when given of God it ruined them when abused by themselves contrary to express declarations of his mind and will For although the generality of them were wicked and rebellious always breaking the Terms of the Covenant which God made with them so far as it was possible they should whil'st God determined to reign over them unto the appointed season and repined under the burden of it yet they would have this Covenant to be the only Rule and Means of righteousness life and salvation as the Apostle declares Rom. 9. 31 32 33. Chap. 10. 3. For as we have often said there were two things in it both which they abused unto other ends than what God designed them 1 There was the Renovation of the Rule of the Covenant of Works for righteousness and life And this they would have to be given unto them for those ends and so sought for righteousness by the works of the Law 2 There was ordained in it a Typical Representation of the way and means whereby the Promise was to be made effectual namely in the Mediation and Sacrifice of Jesus Christ which was the end of all their Ordinances of Worship And the outward Law thereof with the observance of its Institution they looked on as their only relief when they came short of exact and perfect righteousness Against both these pernicious Errors the Apostle disputes expresly in his Epistle unto the Romans and the Galatians to save them if it were possible from that ruine they were casting themselves into Hereon the Elect obtained but the rest were hard ned For hereby they made an absolute renunciation of the Promise wherein alone God had enwrapped the way of life and salvation This is the nature and substance of that Covenant which God made with that People a particular temporary Covenant it was and not a meer dispensation of the Covenant of Grace That which remains for the declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost in this whole matter is to declare the differences that are between those two Covenants whence the one is said to be better than the other and to be built upon better Promises Those of
service Yea it was so far from it that any person entred with him into the Holy Place that no one was allowed to be in the other part of the Sanctuary where he might so much as see the vail opened or look in after him whilst he performed his service ver 17. As all the People were kept out of the Sanctuary whilst the Priests entred daily into it and waited at the door so all the Priests were kept without the Sanctuary whilst the High Priest entred into the most Holy Place Hence there was one alwayes provided who was next in succession unto that office to perform this office in case of Sickness or occasional Pollutions of him who was actually High Priest And he was called the second Priest 1 Kings 25. 16. From whence in times of disorder and confusion they had afterwards two High Priests at once Iohn 18. 13 24. Thus sacredly was the presence of God in the Holy Place made inaccessible not only to all the People but even unto all the Priests themselves Some say that indeed the High Priest went alone into the Holy Place once a year only but with other Priests and on other occasions he might enter oftener But this is weak beneath consideration For the express institution was that he should go alone and go but once And this was that great Truth which in this ordinance God stated unto the Church namely that there is no entrance into the gracious presence of God but by the High Priest That the true High Priest should take along all Believers with him and give them admission with boldness unto the Throne of Grace was as the Apostle declares in the next verse not as yet made known 2. The way whereby he ingaged into this service was that he went into this Holy Place This as we observed before is not here expressed but is necessarily traduced from the foregoing verse And it is his entrance through the vail that is intended which also was a part of his service For it was a Type both of the entrance of Christ into Heaven and of our entrance by him unto the Throne of Grace ver 24. chap. 10. 19 20. This was that vail which in the Temple was rent from the top to the bottom upon the death of our Saviour Matth. 27. 51. For hereby the way was laid open into the Holy Place and the gracious Presence of God discovered unto all that come unto him by Christ. 3. The Time of this service is expressed that it was once only every year The first order unto this purpose was a Prohibition or negative precept that the High Priest should not come at all times into the Holy Place Lev. 16. 2. that is not every day as he did into the Sanctuary not at any time of his own choice He might not choose he might not appoint a time for the service of this Holy Place whatever occasion he apprehended of it or necessity for it Times of sacred worship are the Lords no less then the things of it Our own stated times are no less disapproved by him than any other parts of sacred worship of our own finding out 1 Kings 12. 32 33. And as this time of the entrance of the High Priest into the most Holy Place was limited unto once a year which our Apostle observes so the precise day of the year was determined by the Law It was fixed unto the tenth day of the seventh month or Tizri which reckoning from Nisan the beginning of their ecclesiastical year answers unto our September This was the great day of Atonement which with the fruits of it ensued thereon Lev. 16. 29. But whereas it is said that he entred once every year the meaning is that upon one day in the year only he did so and had liberty so to do For it is evident that on that day he went twice into it yea most probable that he did so four times He had three offerings or sacrifices to offer on the day of expiation The first was of a Bullock and a Ram for himself and his houshold Lev. 16. 3. This the Apostle notes distinctly which he offered for himself Secondly a Goat for a Sin-offering which he offered for the People for the errors of the People ver 9. Thirdly the service of the scape Goat which also had the nature of a Sacrifice ver 10. Of the two first whose blood was offered on the Altar it is said distinctly that he carried of the blood into the most Holy Place He did so first that of the Bullock and the Ram before he offered the Goat for the sins of the People He killed not the Goat until he came out of the Holy Place after he had carried in the blood of the Sacrifice for himself ver 11 12 13 14. After this he carried in the blood of the Goat that was offered for the sins of the People ver 15. So that of necessity he must enter twice distinctly on that one day into the most Holy Place Yea it is most probable and almost very certain that he entred into it four times on that day For before he carried in the blood he was to go in with the Incense to make a cloud over the Mercy-seat And it is evident that he could not carry in the Incense and the blood at the same time For when he went in with the Incense he had in one hand a Censer full of burning coals from the Altar and he so carried it ' that besides both his hands were filled with Incense ver 12. that he could carry no blood with him at that time For when he carried in the blood also both his hands were in like manner employed For with the finger of one he was to sprinkle the blood upon and before the Mercy-seat whence it is of necessity that he must have the blood which he sprinkled in his other hand For he was to sprinkle it seven times which could not be done with the blood that was at once upon the finger wherewith he sprinkled it Wherefore this once every year is on one day only for that day he entred four times into the Holy Place within the Vail as is plain in the order of the service according unto its Institution When all this was done that there might be a full representation of the Atonement to be made by the Lord Christ and of the plenary remission of sins by his blood the High Priest laid all the sins of the People on the Head of the scape Goat who carried them away into the wilderness of everlasting oblivion ver 20 21 22. As these Institutions were multiplyed to typifie the one single sacrifice and oblation of the body of Christ because of the imperfection inseparable from the nature of earthly things whereby no one of them could absolutely represent it so in this distinction and distribution of them the Condescention Love and Grace of God were adorable and glorious For in the shedding of the
The Redemption or Expiation of Sins is confined unto those under the Old Testament whence it should seem that there is none made for those under the New Ans. The Emphasis of the Expression Sins under the Old Testament respect either the Time when the sins intended were committed or the Testament against which they were committed And the Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will admit of either sense Take it in the first way and the Argument follows à fortiori as unto the Sins committed under the New Testament though there be no Expiation of Sins against it which properly are only final Unbelief and Impenitency For the Expiation intended is made by the Mediator of the New Testament And if he expiated the Sins that were under the first Testament that is of those who lived and dyed whil'st that Covenant was in force much more doth he do so for them who live under the Administration of that Testament whereof he is the Mediator For Sins are taken away by vertue of that Testament whereunto they do belong And it is with peculiar respect unto them that the blood of Christ is called the blood of the New Testament for the Redemption of Sins But yet more probably the meaning may be the Sins that were and are committed against that first Covenant or the Law and Rule of it For whereas that Covenant did in its Administration comprise the Moral Law which was the substance and foundation of it all Sins whatever have their form and nature with respect thereunto So Sins under the first Covenant are all Sins whatever For there is no Sin committed under the Gospel but it is a Sin against that Law which requires us to love the Lord our God with all our hearts and all our strength Either way the Sins of them who are called under the New Testament are included 2. It is enquired whether it is the Nature of the Sins intended that is respected or the Persons guilty of them also under that Testament The Syriac Translation avoids this difficulty by rendring the words of the Abstract the Redemption of Transgressions in the Concrete a Redeemer unto them who had transgressed That it is a certain sort of Sins that is intended Socinus was the first that invented And his invention is the foundation of the Exposition not only of Schlictingius but of Grotius also on this place Such Sins they say they are as for which no Expiation was to be made by the Sacrifices of the Law Sins of a greater Nature than could be expiated by them For they only made Expiation of some smaller Sins as Sins of Ignorance or the like But there is no respect unto the Persons of them who lived under that Testament whom they will not grant to be redeemed by the blood of Christ. Wherefore according unto them the difference between the Expiation of Sin by the Sacrifices of the Law and that by the Sacrifice of Christ doth not consist in their nature that the one did it only typically and in an external representation by the purifying of the flesh the other really and effectually but in this that the one expiated lesser Sins only the other greater also But there is nothing sound or consonant unto the Truth in this Interpretation of the words For 1 It proceeds on a false Supposition that there were Sins of the people not only presumptuous Sins and which had impenitency in them for which no Atonement was made nor Expiation of them allowed which is expresly contrary unto Lev. 16. 16 21. And whereas some offences were capital amongst them for which no Atonement was allowed to free the Sinner from death yet that belonged unto the Political Rule of the people and hindred not but that typically all sorts of Sins were to be expiated 2 It is contrary unto the express design of the Apostle For he had proved before by all sorts of Arguments that the Sacrifices of the Law could not expiate any Sin could not purge the Conscience from dead works that they made nothing perfect And this he speaks not of this or that Sin but of every Sin wherein the Conscience of a Sinner is concerned Chap. 10. 2. Hence two things follow First That they did not in and of themselves really expiate any one Sin small or great It was impossible saith the Apostle that they should do so Heb. 10. 4. only they sanctified to the purifying of the flesh which overthrows the foundation of this Exposition Secondly That they did typifie and represent the Expiation of all sorts of Sins whatever and made application of it unto their Souls For if it was so that there was no Atonement for their Sins that their Consciences were not purged from dead works nor themselves consummate but only had some outward purification of the flesh it cannot be but they must all eternally perish But that this was not their condition the Apostle proves from hence because they were called of God unto an eternal Inheritance as he had proved at large concerning Abraham Chap. 6. Hence he infers the necessity of the mediation and death of Christ as without the vertue whereof all the called under the first Covenant must perish eternally there being no other way to come to the Inheritance 3. Whereas the Apostle mentions only the Sins under the first Covenant as unto the time passed before the Exhibition of Christ in the flesh or the death of the Mediator of the New Testament what is to be thought of them who lived during that season who belonged not unto the Covenant but were strangers from it such as are described Eph. 4. 12. I answer The Apostle takes no notice of them and that because taking them generally Christ dyed not for them Yea that he did not so is sufficiently proved from this place Those who live and dye strangers from God's Covenant have no interest in the Mediation of Christ. Wherein the Redemption of these Transgressions did consist shall be declared in its proper place And we may observe 1. Such is the malignant Nature of Sin of all Transgression of the Law that unless it be removed unless it be taken out of the way no Person can enjoy the Promise of the Eternal Inheritance 2. It was the Work of God alone to contrive and it was the Effect of infinite Wisdom and Grace to provide a way for the removal of Sin that it might not be an everlasting Obstacle against the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance unto them that are called Fifthly We have declared the design of God here represented unto us who are the Persons towards whom it was to be accomplished and what lay in the way as an hindrance of it That which remains in the words is the way that God took and the means that he used for the removal of that hindrance and the effectual accomplishment of his design This in general was first the making of a New Testament He had fully proved before that this could not
yet what use and advantage was it of with respect unto them that he should dye an accursed death under the Curse of the Law and a sense of God's displeasure Hereof the Socinians and those that follow them can yield no reason at all It would become these men so highly pretending unto reason to give an account upon their own Principles of the death of the onely begotten Son of God in the highest course and most intense Acts of Obedience that may be compliant with the wisdom holiness and goodness of God considering the kind of death that he dyed But what they cannot do the Apostle doth in the next words Eighthly The death of the Mediator of the New Testament was for the Redemption of Transgressions and for this End it was necessary Sin lay in the way of the enjoyment of the Inheritance which Grace had prepared It did so in the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God Unless it were removed the Inheritance could not be received The way whereby this was to be done was by Redemption The Redemption of Transgressions is the deliverance of the Transgressors from all the Evils they were subject unto on their account by the payment of a satisfactory price The words used to express it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will admit of no other signification Here it must answer the purging of Conscience by the blood of Christ. And he calls his life a Ransom or Price of Redemption And this utterly destroys the foundation of the Socinian Redemption and Expiation for Sin For they make it only a freedom from Punishment by an Act of Power Take off the covering of the words which they use in a sense foreign to the Scripture and their proper signification and their sense is expresly contradictory unto the sense and words of the Apostle He declares Christ to have been the High-Priest and Mediator of the New Testament in the same Acts and Duties They teach that he ceased to be a Mediator when he began to be a Priest He affirms that the Blood of Christ doth expiate Sins They that he doth it by an Act of Power in Heaven where there is no use of his Blood He says that his death was necessary unto and was the means or cause of the Redemption of Transgressions that is to be a price of Redemption or just Compensation for them They contend that no such thing is required thereunto And whereas the Scriptures do plainly assign the Expiation of Sin Redemption Reconciliation and Peace with God Sanctification and Salvation unto the Death and Blood-shedding of Christ They deny them all and every one to be in any sense Effects of it only they say it was an antecedent sign of the Truth of his Doctrine in his Resurrection and an antecedent condition of his Exaltation and Power which is to reject the whole Mystery of the Gospel Besides the particular Observations which we have made on the several passages of this Verse something may yet in general be observed from it As 1. A New Testament providing an Eternal Inheritance in Sovereign Grace the Constitution of a Mediator such a Mediator for that Testament in infinite Wisdom and Love the Death of that Testator for the Redemption of Transgressions to fulfil the Law and satisfie the Iustice of God with the communication of that Inheritance by Promise to be received by Faith in all them that are called are the substance of the Mystery of the Gospel And all these are with wonderful wisdom comprised by the Apostle in these words 2. That the Efficacy of the Mediation and Death of Christ extended it self unto all the called under the Old Testament is an evident Demonstration of his Divine Nature his Pre-existence unto all these things and the Eternal Covenant between the Father and him about them 3. The first Covenant did only forbid and Condemn Transgressions Redemption from them is by the New Testament alone 4. The Glory and Efficacy of the New Covenant and the Assurance of the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance by vertue of it depend hereon that it was made a Testament by the death of the Mediator which is farther proved in the following Verses VER XVI XVII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the death of him is declared shewed argued or proved Mors intercedat necesse est Necesse est mortem intercedere Ar. Necesse est mortem ferri which is not proper in the Latine Tongue however there is an emphasis in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more than is expressed by intercedo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him that made it of the Testator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in him that is dead in mortuis among them that are dead 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vulg confirmatum est and so the Syriac ratum est more proper 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no use profit or benefit in it Ar. nunquam valet quandoquidem nunquam valet nondum valet it is not yet of force For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be brought in the death of the Testator For a Testament is firm or ratified after men are dead otherwise it is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth There is not much more to be considered in these verses but only how the Observation contained in them doth promote and confirm the Argument which the Apostle insists upon Now this is to prove the necessity and use of the death of Christ from the Nature Ends and Use of the Covenant whereof he was the Mediator For it being a Testament it was to be confirmed with the death of the Testator This is proved in these Verses from the Notion of a Testament and the only use of it amongst men For the Apostle in this Epistle doth argue several times from such usages amongst men as proceeding from the Principles of Reason and Equity were generally prevalent among them So he doth in his discourse concerning the assurance given by the Oath of God Chap. 6. And here he doth the same from what was commonly agreed upon and suitable unto the reason of things about the nature and use of a Testament The things here mentioned were known to all approved by all and were the principal means of the preservation of Peace and Property in Humane Societies For although Testaments as unto their especial Regulation owe their original unto the Roman Civil Law yet as unto the substance of them they were in use amongst all Mankind from the foundation of the world For a Testament is the just determination of a Man's Will concerning what he will have done with his Goods after his decease Or it is the Will of him that is dead Take this power from men and you root up the whole foundation of all industry and diligence in the world For what man will labour to increase his substance if when
offering or Sacrifice which render the Repetition of it needless It was one once offered in the end of the world nor need be offered any more because of the Total abolition and destruction of sin at once made thereby What else concerns the things themselves spoken of will be comprized under the ensuing observations 1. It is the Prerogative of God and the effect of his wisdom to determine the times and seasons of the dispensation of Himself and his Grace unto the Church Hereon it depends alone that Christ appeared in the end of the world not sooner nor later as to the parts of that season Many things do evidence a condecency unto Divine wisdom in the determination of that season As 1. He testified his displeasure against Sin in suffering the generality of mankind to lye so long under the fatal effects of their Apostacy without relief or Remedy Act. 14. 16. Chap. 17. 30. Rom. 1. 21 24 26. 2. He did it To exercise the faith of the Church called by vertue of the promise in the expectation of its accomplishment And by the various wayes whereby God cherished their faith and hope was he glorified in all Ages Luk 1. 70. Mat. 13. 16. Luk. 10. 24. 1 Pet. 1. 10 11. Hag. 2. 7. 3. To prepare the Church for the Reception of him partly by the glorious representation made of him in the Tabernacle and Temple with their worship partly by the Burden of Legal Institutions laid on them until his coming Gal. 3. 24. 4. To give the world a full and sufficient trial of what might be attained towards happiness and Blessedness by the excellency of all things here below Men had time to try what was in Wisdom Learning Moral Vertue Power Rule Dominion Riches Arts and whatever else is valuable unto Rational Natures They were all exalted unto their height in their possession and exercise before the Appearance of Christ and all manifested their own insufficiency to give the least real Relief unto Mankind from under the fruits of their Apostacy from God See 1 Cor. 1. 5. To give time unto Satan to fix and establish his Kingdom in the world that the destruction of him and it might be the more conspicuous and glorious These and sundry other things of a like nature do evince that there was a condecency unto Divine wisdom in the Determination of the season of the Appearance of Christ in the flesh Howbeit it is ultimately to be resolved into his Soveraign will and pleasure 2. God had a Design of Infinite Wisdom and Grace in his sending of Christ and his appearance in the world thereon which could not be frustrate He appeared to put away sin The footsteps of Divine wisdome and Grace herein I have enquired into in a peculiar Treatise and shall not here insist on the same Argument 3. Sin had erected a Dominion a Tyranny over all men as by a Law Unless this Law be abrogated and abolished we can have neither Deliverance nor Liberty Men generally think that they serve themselves of sin in the accomplishment of their lusts and gratification of the flesh But they are indeed servants of it and slaves unto it It hath gotten a power to command their obedience unto it and a power to bind them over to eternal death for the disobedience unto God therein As unto what belongs unto this Law and power See my Discourse of Indwelling Sin 4. No power of man of any meer Creature was able to evacuate disannul or abolish this Law of sin For 5. The Destruction and dissolution of this Law and power of sin was the great end of the coming of Christ for the discharge of his Priestly Office in the Sacrifice of himself No other way could it be effected And 6. It is the Glory of Christ it is the safety of the Church that by his one offering by the Sacrifice of himself once for all he hath abolished sin as unto the Law and condemning power of it VER XXVII XXVIII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sicut quem admodum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Statutum constitutum est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Sons of men of Adam all his Posterity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that at one time a certain appointed time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. post hoc autem Postea verò and afterward Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and after their death the death of them So also Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one time at one time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. ad exhaurienda peccata Rhem. to exhaust the sins of many without any sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may signifie to lift or bear up not at all to draw out of any deep place though there may be something in that allusion Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in himself he slew or sacrificed the sins of many in himself that is by the Sacrifice of himself he took them away Bez. ut in seipso attolleret multorum peccata that he might lift or bear up the sins of many in himself he took them upon himself as a Burden which he bare upon the Cross as opposed to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 afterwards not burdened with sin Others ad attollendum peccata multorum in semet ipsum to take up unto himself that is upon himself the sins of many The Syriack reads the last â—ause He shall appear the second time unto the Salvation of them that expect or look for him All others he shall appear unto or be seen by them that look for him unto Salvation unto which difference we shall speak afterwards VER XXVII XXVIII And in like manner as it is appointed unto men once to die but after this afterwards the judgment So also Christ was once offered to bear in himself the sin of many and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without Sin unto Salvation These verses put a close unto the Heavenly Discourse of the Apostle concerning the Causes Nature Ends and Efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ wherewith the new Covenant was dedicated and confirmed And in the words there is a treble Confirmation of that Singularity and Efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ which he had pleaded before 1. In an Elegant instructive Similitude And as it is appointed ver 27. 2. In a declaration of the use and end of the Offering of Christ he was once offered to bear the Sins of many 3. In the consequent of it his second Appearance unto the Salvation of Believers ver 28. In the comparison we must first consider the force of it in general and explain the words That as we have observed which the Apostle designeth to confirm and illustrate is what he had pleaded in the foregoing verses concerning the Singularity and efficacy of the offering of Christ whereon also he takes occasion to declare the blessed
consequents of it Hereof he gives an illustration by comparing it unto what is of absolute and unavoidable necessity so as that it cannot otherwise be namely the death of all the individuals of mankind by the decretory sentence of God As they must dye every one and every one but once so Christ was to dye to suffer to offer himself and that but once The instances of those who died not after the manner of other men as Enoch and Elias or those who having died once were raised from the dead and died again as Lazarus give no difficulty herein They are instances of exemption from the common Rule by meer acts of Divine Sovereignty But the Apostle argues from the general Rule and Constitutions and thereon alone the force of his comparisons doth depend and they are not weakned by such exemptions As this is the certain unalterable law of Humane condition that every man must dye once and but once as unto this mortal life so Christ was once and but once offered But there is more in the words and design of the Apostle than a bare Similitude and illustration of what he treats of though Expositors own it not He doth not only illustrate his former Assertion by a fit comparison but gives the Reason of the one offering of Christ from what it was necessary for and designed unto For that he introduceth a Reason of his former Assertion the Causal connexion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth demonstrate Especially as it is joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in quantum inasmuch as in which sense he constantly useth that expression chap. 3. 3. chap. 7. 20. chap. 8. 6. And in as much as it was so with mankind it was necessary that Christ should suffer once for the expiation of Sin and the Salvation of Sinners How was it with mankind in this matter On the account of sin they were all subject unto the Law and the curse thereof Hereof there were two parts 1 Temporal Death to be undergone penally on the sentence of God 2 Eternal judgment wherein they were to perish for evermore In these things consist the effects of sin and the curse of the Law And they were due unto all men unavoidably to be inficted on them by the judgment and sentence of God It is appointed decreed determined of God that men sinful men shall once die and after that come to judgment for their Sins This is the sense the sentence the substance of the Law Under this Sentence they must all perish eternally if not Divinely relieved But inasmuch as it was thus with them the one offering of Christ once offered is prepared for their Relief and deliverance And the relief is in the infinite Wisdom of God eminently proportionate unto the evil the remedy unto the disease For 1. As man was to dye once legally and penally for sin by the sentence of the Law and no more So Christ died suffered and offered once and no more to bear Sin to expiate it and thereby to take away death so far as it was penal 2. As after death men must appear again the second time unto judgement to undergo condemnation thereon so after his once offering to take away Sin and Death Christ shall appear the second time to free us from judgement and to bestow on us eternal Salvation In this interpretation of the words I do not exclude the use of the comparison nor the design of the Apostle to illustrate the one offering of Christ once offered by the certainty of the death of men once onely for these things do illustrate one another as so compared But withal I judge there is more in them than a meer comparison between things no way related one to another but onely have some mutual resemblance in that they fall out but once Yea there seems not to be much light nor any thing of Argument in a comparison so arbitrarily framed But consider these things in their mutual Relation and opposition one unto the other which are the same with that of the Law and the Gospel and there is much of light and argument in the comparing of them together For whereas the end of the Death Suffering and Offering of Christ was to take away and remove the punishment due unto Sin which consisted in this that men should once die and but once and afterwards come to judgment and condemnation according to the sentence of the Law And it was convenient unto Divine Wisdom that Christ for that end should Dye Suffer Offer once only and afterwards bring them for whom he died unto Salvation And this is the proper sense of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in quantum which Interpreters know not what to make of in this place but endeavour variously to change and alter Some pretend that some Copies read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they suppose came from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the onely Reason why the word is not liked is because the sense is not understood Take the mind of the Apostle aright and his expression is proper unto his purpose Wherefore there is in these verses an entire opposition and comparison between the Law and the Gospel the Curse due to Sin and the Redemption that is by Christ Jesus And we may observe That God hath eminently suited our Relief the means and causes of our spiritual Deliverance unto our Misery the means and causes of it as that his own Wisdom and Grace may be exalted and our faith established That which is here summarily represented by our Apostle in this Elegant Antithesis he declares at large Rom. 5. from ver 12. to the end of the Chapter But we proceed with the interpretation of the words In the first part of the Antithesis and comparison ver 27. there are three things asserted 1 The Death of men 2 The judgment that ensues and 3. The cause of them both The last is first to be explained It is Appointed Determined Enacted statutum est It is so by him who hath a Sovereign Power and Authority in and over these things and hath the force of an unalterable Law which none can transgress God himself hath thus appointed it none else can determine and dispose of these things And the word equally respects both parts of the Assertion Death and Judgment They are both equally from the constitution of God which is the cause of them both The Socinians do so divide these things that one of them namely Death they would have to be natural and the other or judgment from the constitution of God which is not to interpret but to contradict the words Yea death is that which in the first place and directly is affirmed to be the effect of this Divine Constitution being spoken of as it is Penal by the curse of the Law for sin and judgment falls under the same constitution as consequential thereunto But if death as they plead be meerly and only natural they
cannot refer it unto the same Divine Constitution with the future judgment which is natural in no sense at all Death was so far natural from the beginning as that the frame and constitution of our nature were in themselves liable and subject thereunto But that it should actually have invaded our nature unto its dissolution without the intervention of its meritorious Cause in Sin is contrary unto the Original state of our Relation unto God the nature of the Covenant whereby we were obliged unto Obedience the Reward promised therein with the threatning of Death in case of disobedience Wherefore the Law Statute or Constitution here related unto is no other but that of Gen. 2. 17. In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely dye with that addition dust thou art and unto dust thou shalt return Chap. 3. 19. God enacted it as an everlasting Law concerning Adam and all his Posterity that they should dye and that once as they were once taken out of the Dust. But in the words of God before mentioned there are two things 1. A penal Law enacted Gen. 3. 17. 2. A judicial sentence denounced Chap. 2. 19. not onely Death but future judgment also was appointed thereby Thus it is appointed to men that is to all men or men indefinitely without exception it is their lot and portion It is appointed unto men not meerly as men but as sinners as sinful men For it is of sin and the effects of it with their removal by Christ that the Apostle discourseth It is appointed unto them to dye that is penally for sin as Death was threatned in that Penal statute mentioned in the curse of the Law And death under that consideration alone is taken away by the death of Christ. The sentence of dying naturally is continued towards all but the moral nature of dying with the consequents of it are removed from some by Christ The Law is not absolutely reversed but what was formally penal in it is taken away Observe 1. Death in the first constitution of it was penal And the entrance of it as a penalty keeps the fear of it in all living Yea it was by the Law Eternally Penal Nothing was to come after death but Hell And 2. It is still penal Eternally penal unto all unbelievers But there are false notions of it amongst men as there are of all other things Some are afraid of it when the penalty is separated from it Some on the other hand look on it as a Relief and so either seek it or desire it unto whom it will prove only an entrance unto judgment It is the interest of all living to enquire diligently what death will be unto them 3. The death of all is equally determined and certain in Gods constitution It hath various wayes of approach unto all individuals Hence is it generally looked on as an accident befalling this or that man But the Law concerning it is general and equal The Second part of the Assertion is that after this is the judgment This by the same Divine unalterable constitution is appointed unto all God hath appointed a day wherein he will judge the world in Righteousness Death makes an not end of men as some think others hope and many would desire it should Ipsa mors nihil post mortem nihil But there is something yet remaining which death is subservient unto Hence it is said to be after this As surely as men dye it is sure that somewhat else follows after death This is the force of the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but but after it Now this after doth not denote the immediate succession of one thing unto another if one go before and the other certainly follow after what ever length of time be interposed between them the Assertion is true and proper Many have been long dead probably the most that shall dye and yet judgment is not come after But it shall come in its appointed season and so as that nothing shall interpose between death and judgment to make any alteration in the state or condition of the persons concerned in them The souls of them that are dead are yet alive but are utterly incapable of any change in their condition between death and judgment As death leaves men so shall judgment find them The second part of this penal constitution is judgment after death judgment It is not a particular judgment on every individual person immediately on his death although such a judgment there be For in and by death there is a declaration made concerning the eternal condition of the deceased But judgment here is opposed unto the second appearance of Christ unto the Salvation of believers which is the great or general judgment of all at the last day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used with respect unto this day or taken absolutely do signifie a condemnatory sentence only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the resurrection of or unto judgment is opposed unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the resurrection of or unto life Joh. 5. 29. See ver 22 23 24. So is it here used Judgment that is condemnation for sin follows after death in the righteous constitution of God by the sentence of the Law And as Christ by his death doth not take away death absolutely but only as it was penal so on his Second appearance he doth not take away judgment absolutely but only as it is a condemnatory sentence with respect unto Believers For as we must all dye so we must all appear before his judgment seat Rom. 14. 10. But as he hath promised that those that believe in him shall not see death for they are passed from death unto life they shall not undergo it as it is penal so also he hath that they shall not come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word here used into judgment Joh. 5. 24. They shall be freed from the condemnatory sentence of the Law For the nature and manner of this judgment see the Exposition on Chap. 6. 5. This then is the sense of the words Whereas therefore or in as much as this is the constitution of God that man sinful man shall once dye and afterwards be judged or condemned for sin Which would have been the event with all had not a Relief been provided which in opposition hereunto is declared in the next verse And no man that dyes in sin shall ever escape judgment VER XXVIII This verse gives us the Relief provided in the wisdom and Grace of God for and from this condition And there is in the words 1. The Redditive note of comparison and opposition So 2. The subject spoken of the offering of Christ. 3. The End of it to bear the sin of many 4 The consequent of it which must be spoken to distinctly 1. The Redditive note is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So in like manner in answer unto that state of things and for the Remedy against it in a blessed condecency unto Divine
own Intention and Resolution to comply with his Will in Order unto another way of Attonement for Sin Lo I come to do thy Will O God which words have been opened before In the last place he declares what was intimated and signified in this Order of those things being thus spoken unto Sacrifices on the one hand which was the First and the coming of Christ which was the Second in this Order and Opposition It is evident 1. That these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he taketh away the First do intend Sacrifices and Offerings But he did not so do it immediately at the speaking of these words for they continued for the space of some Hundreds of years afterwards but he did so declaratively as unto the Indication of the time namely when the Second should be introduced 2. The end of this removal of the First was the establishment of the Second This Second say some is the Will of God but the Opposition made before is not between the Will of God and the Legal Sacrifices but between those Sacrifices and the coming of Christ to do the Will of God Wherefore it is the way of the Expiation of Sin and of the compleat Sanctification of the Church by the Coming and Mediation and Sacrifice of Christ that is this Second the thing spoken of in the Second place this God would establish approve confirm and render unchangeable As all things from the beginning made way for the coming of Christ in the minds of them that did believe so every thing was to be removed out of the way that would hinder his coming and the discharge of the work he had undertaken Law Temple Sacrifices must all be removed to give way unto his coming So is it testified by his fore-runner Luke 3. 4. As it is written in the Book of the words of Isaiah the Prophet saying the Voice of one crying in the Wilderness prepare ye the way of the Lord make his Paths straight and the rough Ways shall be made smooth and all flesh shall see the Salvation of God So it must be in our own Hearts all things must give way unto him or he will not come and take his Habitation in them VERSE 10. By the which Will we are Sanctified through the Offering of the Body of Jesus Christ once for all From the whole Context the Apostle makes an Inference which is comprehensive of the Substance of the Gospel and the description of the Grace of God which is established thereby Having affirmed in Christs own words that he came to do the Will of God he shews what was that Will of God which he came to do what was the design of God in it and the effect of it and by what means it was accomplished which things are to be enquired into As 1. What is the Will of God which he intends By which Will. 2. What was the design of it what God aimed at in this act of his Will and what is accomplished thereby We are sanctified 3. The way and means whereby this effect proceedeth from the Will of God namely through the Offering of the Body of Jesus Christ in opposition to Legal Sacrifices 4. The manner of it in opposition unto their Repetition it was once for all But the sense of the whole will be more clear if we consider the end aimed at in the first place namely the Sanctification of the Church And sundry things must be observed concerning it 1. That the Apostle changeth his Phrase of Speech into the first person we are Sanctified that is all those Believers whereof the Gospel Church-State was constituted in opposition unto the Church-State of the Hebrews and those that did adhere unto it so he speaks before as also Chap. 4. 3. We who have believed do enter into Rest. For it might be asked of him you that thus overthrow the Efficacy of Legal Sacrifices what have you your selves attained in your relinquishment of them We have saith he that Sanctification that Dedication unto God that Peace with him and that Expiation of Sin that all those Sacrifices could not effect And observe 1. Truth is never so effectually declared as when it is confirmed by the experience of its Power in them that believe it and make profession of it This was that which gives them the confidence which the Apostle exhorts them to hold fast and firm unto the end 2. It is an Holy Glorying in God and no unlawful boasting for Men openly to profess what they are made partakers of by the Grace of God and Blood of Christ. Yea it is a necessary duty for Men so to do when any thing is set up in competition with them or opposition unto them 3. It is the best security in differences in and about Religion such as these wherein the Apostle is ingaged the greatest and highest that ever were when Men have an Internal Experience of the Truth which they do profess 2. The words he useth are in the Preterperfect tense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and relate not only unto the things but the time of the Offering of the Body of Christ. For although all that is intended herein did not immediately follow on the Death of Christ yet were they all in it as the Effects in their proper cause to be produced by virtue of it in their times and seasons and the principal effect intended was the immediate consequent thereof 3. This end of God through the Offering of the Body of Christ was the Sanctification of the Church we are Sanctified The principal Notion of Sanctification in the New Testament is the effecting of real Internal Holiness in the persons of them that do believe by the change of their Hearts and Lives But the word is not here so to be restrained nor is it used in that sence by our Apostle in this Epistle or very rarely It is here plainly comprehensive of all that he hath denied unto the Law Priest-hood and Sacrifices of the Old Testament with the whole Church-State of the Hebrews under it and the effects of their Ordinances and Services As 1. A compleat Dedication unto God in Opposition unto the Typical one which the people were partakers of by the sprinkling of the Blood of Calves and Goats upon them Exod. 24. 2. A compleat Church-state for the Celebration of the Spiritual Worship of God by the Administration of the Spirit wherein the Law could make nothing perfect 3. Peace with God upon a full and perfect Expiation of Sin which he denies unto the Sacrifices of the Law ver 1 2 3 4. 4. Real Internal purification or sanctification of our Natures and Persons from all inward Filth and Defilement of them which he proves at large that the Carnal Ordinances of the Law could not effect of themselves reaching no farther than the Purification of the Flesh. 5. Hereunto also belong the priviledges of the Gospel in Liberty Boldness immediate Access unto God the means of that Access by Christ our High-Priest
do judge that these are the Enemies of Christ and the making of them his Footstool which are peculiarly here intended namely the destruction of the hardned unbelieving Jews who had obstinately rejected his Ministry and opposed it unto the end Then were those his Enemies who so refused him slain and destroyed thereon For 1. This Description of his Enemies as his Enemies peculiarly directs us unto this sense the Enemies of his Person Doctrine and Glory with whom he had so many contests whose Blasphemies and Contradictions he underwent They were his Enemies in a peculiar manner 2. This the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 expecting better answers unto than unto the other sense For the glorious visible propagation of the Gospel and Kingdom of Christ thereon began and was carried on gloriously upon and after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Church of the Jews his Enemies With reference hereunto Expectation may be no less distinctly ascribed unto him than if we extend the word unto the whole time unto the end of the World 3. The Act of Vengeance on these his Enemies is not said to be his own but peculiarly assigned unto God the Father and those imployed by him In the Original promise the words of God the Father to him are I will make thine Enemies thy Footstool I take it upon me Vengeance is mine to revenge the injuries done unto thee and the obstinacy of those Unbelievers Here in this place respect is had unto the means that God used in the work of their destruction which was the Roman Army by whom they were as the Footstool of Christ absolutely trodden under his feet with respect unto this special Act of God the Father who in the Execution of it proclaims that Vengeance is his For in the following words the Lord Christ is said only to expect it as that wherein his own cause was vindicated and revenged as it were by another Hand while he pleaded it himself in the World by that mild and gentle means of sending his spirit to convince them of Sin Righteousness and Judgment 4. This is that which the Apostle constantly threatens the obstinate Hebrews and Apostate Professors of the Gospel withal throughout this Epistle the time of their destruction being now at hand So he doth Chap. 6. 4 5 6 7 8. In this Chapter ver 26 27 28 29 30 31. Where it must be spoken to 5. This was that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or what remained as unto the personal Ministry of Christ in this World The horrible Destruction of the stubborn Obstinate Enemies of the Person and Office of Christ which befell the Nation of the Jews is a standing security of the endless destruction of all who remain his Obstinate adversaries 6. I leave this Interpretation of the Words unto the thoughts of them that are Judicious and shall open the Mind of the Holy Ghost in them according unto the generally received Opinion of their sense And to this end 1. The Subject spoken of is the Enemies of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his Enemies He hath had many Enemies ever since his Exaltation and so shall have unto the Consummation of all things when they shall all of them be Triumphed over For his Enemies are of two sorts 1. Such as are so immediately and directly unto his Person 2. Such as are so to his Office and Work with the benefits of the Salvation of the Church Those of the first sort are either Devils or Men. All the Devils are in a Combination as sworn Enemies unto the Person of Christ and his Kingdom And for Men the whole World of Unbelieving Jews Mahumetans and Pagans are all his Enemies and do put forth all their Power in Opposition unto him The Enemies unto his Office Grace and Work and the benefits of it are either persons or things 1. The Head of this Opposition and Enmity unto his Person is Antichrist with all his Adherents and in a special manner all Worldly Power Authority and Rule acting themselves in subserviency unto the Antichristian Interest 2. All Pernicious Heresies against his Person and Grace 3. All others which make Profession of the Gospel and live not as becomes the Gospel they are all Enemies of Christ and his Office The things which rise up in Enmity and Opposition to him and the work of his Grace are Sin Death the Grave and Hell All these endeavour to obstruct and frustrate all the ends of Christs Mediation and are therein his Enemies 2. There is the Disposal of this Subject of these Enemies of Christ. They shall be made his Footstool 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 until they be put and placed in this condition it is a State which they would not be in but they shall be made put and placed in it whether they will or no as the word signifies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Footstool is used in a Threefold sence in the Scripture 1. For the visible pledge of Gods Presence and his Worship Gods Throne as we have shewed was represented by the Ark Mercy-Seat and Cherubims in the most Holy Place whereon the Sanctuary it self was his Footstool 1 Chron. 28. 2. Psal. 99. 5. Psal. 132. 7. So it is applyed unto God and his presence in the Church as the Ark was his Throne so the Sanctuary was his Footstool 2. It is applyed unto God and his presence in the World so Heaven above is called his Throne and this lower part of the Creation is his Footstool Isa. 66. 1. In neither of these senses are the Enemies of Christ to be his Footstool Therefore it is taken 3. For a Despised Conquered Condition a State of a mean subjected people deprived of all power and benefit and brought into absolute subjection In no other sense can it be applyed unto the Enemies of Christ as here it is Yet doth it not signifie the same condition absolutely as unto all persons and things that are his Enemies For they are not of one Nature and their subjection to him is such as their Natures are capable of But these things are intended in it 1. The Deprivation of all Power Authority and Glory They fate on Thrones but now are under the Seat of him who is the only Potentate 2. An utter defeat of their Design in opposing either his Person or the work of his Grace in the Eternal Salvation of his Church They shall not hurt or destroy no more in the Mountain of the Lord. 3. Their Eternal Disposal by the Will of Christ according as his Glory shall be manifested therein Sin Death the Grave and Hell as unto their Opposition to the Church shall be utterly destroyed 1 Cor. 15. 55 56 57. and there shall be no more Death Sathan and Antichrist shall be destroyed two ways 1. Initially and Gradually 2. Absolutely and Compleatly The First they are in all Ages of the Church from the time of Christs Glorious Ascension into Heaven They were then immediately put in subjection to him
is dangerous as unto the continuance of the presence of Christ amongst us 3. The motive it self is the approach of the day concerning which we must enquire 1. What day it is that is intended 2. How it did approach And then How it did evidence it self so to be as they saw it 1. The day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an eminent day The Rule whereby we may determine what day is intended is this it was such a day as was a peculiar motive unto the Hebrews in their present circumstances to attend diligently unto the due performance of Gospel Duties It is not such a day such a Motive as is alwaies common to all but only unto those who are in some measure in the same circumstances with them Wherefore it is neither the day of death personally unto them nor the day of the future Judgment absolutely that is intended For those are common unto all equally and at all times and are a powerful motive in General unto the performance of Gospel Duties but not an especial peculiar Motive at some time unto peculiar diligence Wherefore this day was no other but that fearful and tremendous day a season for the destruction of Jerusalem the Temple City and Nation of the Jews which our Saviour had forewarned his Disciples of and which they had in continual expectation But it may be said How should the Approach of this day wherein all things seem to be dissolved the Church to be scattered the whole Nation to be consumed with blood and fire be a motive unto redoubled diligence in attendance unto the duties of Christian Assemblies It should now seem rather to have been a time for every one to shift for himself and his Family than to leave all at uncertainties and unto ruine whilest they looked after these Assemblies Answ. 1. Whatever Desolations and Destructions may be approaching our best and wisest frame will be to trust unto God in the discharge of our duty All other contrivances will prove not only vain and foolish but destructive unto our Souls The day here intended was coming on the people and Nation for their neglect and contempt of the Gospel it was the Revenge of their Murder unbelief and Obstinacy against Christ. Wherefore if any that made Profession of the Gospel were now negligent and careless in the known duties of it they could have no evidence or satisfaction in their own minds that they should not fall in the fire of that day They who will in any degree partake of mens sins must in some degree or other partake of their plagues 2. It is impossible that men should go or be carryed through a day of publique Calamity a destructive day comfortably and chearfully without a diligent attendance unto those known duties of the Gospel For 1. The Guilt of this neglect will seize upon them when their tryal shall come and they will wish when it is too late that they had kept at a distance from it 2. Let men pretend what they will this decay in those duties argues and evidenceth a decay in all graces which they will find weak and unfit to carry them through their tryals which will bring them unto an unspeakable loss in their own minds 3. The Lord Christ requireth this from us in a way of testimony unto him that we are found faithful in our adherence unto his Institutions upon the approach of such a day For hereby do we evidence both the subjection of our soules unto him as also that we value and esteem the priviledg of the Gospel above all other things 4. Because the duties prescribed in a right discharge of them are the great meanes for the strengthning and supporting of our soules in that part of the tryal which we are to undergo For such a day as that intended hath fire in it to try every mans work of what sort it is and every mans grace both as to its Sincerity and Power Therefore all ways and means whereby our works may be tryed and our graces exercised are required of us in such a season Wherefore Approaching Judgments ought to influence unto especial diligence in all Evangelical Duties 2. How did this day approach It was approaching coming drawing nigh it was in procinctu gradually coming upon them Warnings of it dispositions towards it intimations of its coming were given them every day This I have before given an account of and how the drawings nigh of this day were upon them when this Epistle was written and how in a short time it brake forth upon them in all its severity And these things were so evident as that in the last place the Apostle takes it for granted that they themselves did see openly and evidently the approaching day And it did so in these five things 1. In the accomplishment of the signs of its coming foretold by our Saviour compare Mat. 24. 9. c. with the 32 33 34 verses of this Chapter And besides all the other signs mentioned by our Saviour were entring on their accomplishment 2. In that things were at a great stand as unto the Progress of the Gospel among the Hebrews At the first Preaching of it multitudes were converted unto Christ and the Word continued in efficacy towards them for some season afterwards but now as our Apostle plainly declares in this Epistle the case was changed among them the Elect obtained the rest were hardened Re. 11. The number of the Elect among that people were now gathered in few additions were made unto the Church not daily nor in multitudes as formerly And Believers knew full well that when their work was all accomplished God would not leave the people in their obstinacy but that wrath should come upon them unto the uttermost 3. They saw it approaching in all the Causes of it For the Body of the people having now refused the Gospel were given up unto all wickedness and hatred unto Christ An account whereof is given at large by the Historian of their own Nation 4. The Time and season did manifest it self unto them For whereas the body of that people were to be cut off and cast off as the Apostle expresly declares Rom. 9. 10 11. This could not be done untill a sufficient tender of the Gospel and of Grace by Christ Jesus were first made unto them Notwithstanding all their other wickednesses God would not surprize them with an overturning destruction He had before as Types of his dealing with them warned the old world by Noah and Sodom by Lot before the one was destroyed by water and the other by fire He would also give them their day and make them a sufficient tender of mercy which he had now done towards forty years In this space through the Ministry of the Apostles and other faithfull dispensers of the Word the Gospel had been proposed unto all persons of that Nation throughout the world Rom. 10. 16 17 18 19 20. This being now accomplished they might evidently