here is taken for the singular according to the Hebrew phrase Oleaster As so the Lord saith I have made thee Pharaohs god chap. 7.1 where the word is Elohim in the plurall and sometime a word of the plurall number is joyned with an adjective of the singular as Isai. 19.4 I will deliver the Egyptians into the hands adonim kasheh Dominorum duri of Lords hard where the adjective is put in the singular sometime the adjective that is joyned with it is put in the plurall also but the relative in the singular Iosh. 24.19 Elohim kadashim his he is holy gods that is an holy God so likewise sometime Elohim is put with a verbe singular as Gen. 1.1 Bara Elohim creavit Dii God created sometime with a verbe in the plurall as in this place asherjeeben which may goe before us So then Elohim gods in the plurall is here put for the singular Make us a god Tostat. qu. 4. QUEST VIII How the Israelites would have their god to be made to goe before them TO goe before us 1. It is evident by this wherefore they desired a visible god to be made not to that end that they might with greater libertie eat and drinke feast and play before the idoll which they could not doe before the Lord for the Lord did allow them to rejoyce before him in sober and seemely manner Nor yet because they bee like unto other nations to have some visible image to worship but they shew the end thereof that they might have some visible presence to goe before them Tostat. qu. 6. 2. And whereas Moses being absent they might have desired some other guide in his place to direct them they doe not so both because they know none could be given them like unto Moses and if such an one might be found he was subject to the like danger as they imagined Moses to be fallen into they desire rather some visible god to be given unto them Tostat. qu. 8. 3. Neither were they so senselesse to thinke that an idoll made of silver or gold which hath eyes and seeth not eares and heareth not could goe before them 4 And Tostatus conceit is too curious that because they had seene images in Egypt which had as they thought a certaine divine power in them speaking sometimes and making answer unto demands And among the rest the Egyptian God Apis which was like a pide bull did appeare once in a yeare unto them and used to goe before them unto Memphis and all the Egyptians followed after playing upon their harpâ— and other instruments he thinketh that the Israelites desired the like god to bee given them that they might have an image made endued with some divine power to goe before them But they never had seene any image in Egypt made with mens hands to stirre and move and walke before them The Egyptian god Apis was either a very pide pull indeed or the devill in that likenesse therefore they having seene no such president in Egypt it is not like they imagined any such thing 5. Wherefore these Elohim gods which they desire to be made were none other but images as Laban so calleth his little images gods Gen. 31. Gallas This then is the meaning that some image may be made them quae admoneret eos praesentiae divina which should admonish them of the divine presence Osiander And they say in effect but thus much Instituâ— nobis cultum c. Appoint us some kinde of worship that God may be reconciled unto us Vt pergat nos praecedere That he may go forward still before us as he hath begun Ferus So then their meaning is not that the idoll to be made should still goe before them but that God represented and reconciled thereby might goe on still with them QUEST IX Why the people came to Aaron rather than to Hur his fellow governour BUt it will bee here questioned why the people demand this rather of Aaron than of Hur who was joyned with him in the government chap. 24. 1. R. Salom. maketh this the reason because that the people had killed Hur because he resisted them and this he saith was the manner of his death al the people came and spet into his mouth and so choaked him But it is not like if Hur in so good a cause had given his life that it should have beene omitted Phinehes fact in slaying the adulterer and adulteresse is commended and honourable mention is made thereof but Hur had beene more worthie to have beene recorded for not killing but in suffering himselfe rather to bee killed in defence of Gods pure worship Tostat. qu. 3. 2. Neither yet is it to be supposed that Hur was dead for some mention then is like to have beene made of his death being a principall governour and of the peoples lamentation for him 3. Therefore although Hur may bee thought to have yeelded and consented to their motion as well as Aaron as not being a more holy man than hee yet because Aaron was the chiefe and more principall he onely is mentioned Tostat. qu. 3. QUEST X. Whether at this time the Israelites wanted the presence of the cloud FUrther whereas they desire gods to bee made to goe before them it will be here objected that they had the presence of the cloud which went before them and they therefore needed not to have had any other guide 1. Oleaster therefore thinketh that the cloud might at this time be taken out of their fight but this opinion is briefely confuted before quest 4. the cloud did not leave them till they came into the land of Canaan when the manna also ceased Iosh. 5. 2. Some make the blinde curiositie of the people the cause why they regarded not that ordinarie signe of Gods presence but requested some figure and representation of God answerable to their vanitie Calvin So also Chrysostom Adhuc iâ—spicis quod miraris oblitus es largitoris Thou seest daily that which thou wonderest at namely the manna which fell every morning and thou forgettest the giver 3. But this also may bee joyned to the former reason they had staied 40. dayes in a plat and the cloud stirred not they had continued as long in this place about mount Sinai even fortie dayes as they had beene in all the mansion places since their comming out of Egypt and so they might doubt that this cloud should be their direction no longer to goâ— before them into the promised land and therefore they desire another guide QUEST XI Why they say they knew not what was become of Moses Vers. 1. FOr of this Moses c. we know not what is become of him c. 1. R. Salom. thinketh they supposed he had beene dead and that Satan had made such an apparision in the aire as if they had indeed seene a coffin as if Moses had beene dead and his bodie put into it But if they had conceived that Moses were dead they would not have spoken
before whom all are held as guiltie and who prescribeth no law to himselfe Acacius Contra. But this solution is not sufficient for Ezechiel which saith the same soule that sinneth shall die speaketh also of the judgements of God which should not be inflicted upon the children for the fathers Ex Simler 5. Cajetane giveth this solution Although God in the law command that the sonnes should not bee put to death for the sinnes of the fathers Ipse tamen qui creator conservator Dominus est unicuique nemini facit injuriam c. Yet he that is the Creator preserver and Lord of every mans life doth no man wrong if he temporally chastise the sonnes c. His reason dependeth upon Gods right and power which hee hath over every mans life that as he gave it so he doth no wrong to take it away at his pleasure Contra. But the Lord saith by the Prophet Ezech. 18.32 I desire not the death of him that dieth Now if there were no other cause why the Lord should punish the children of the wicked in taking away their life but the will and pleasure of God the Lord should seeme to desire the death of men contrary to that saying of the Prophet 6. Procopius giveth this exposition that God threatneth to punish the posteritie of the wicked ut parentes à peccandi licentia retraheret to withdraw the fathers from sinning parentes non tam dolent sua morte quà m liberorum prasertim si his fuerint authores mortis Fathers doe not so much grieve for their owne death as for the death of their sonnes especially if they were the cause of it Contra. This is true that the punishment of the children redoundeth to the parents but this is not all that by this meanes the fathers should bee drawne to repentance for although their children be neere them yet they are neerer to themselves and their owne punishment would much more move them 7. There remaine two most usuall expositions the first is that temporally sonnes may be chastned for their fathers but not eternally for aeternaliter quilibet punitur pro malo quod egit c. For eternally every one shall be punished for the evill which he doth himselfe Tostat. quaest 5. So also Thomas Si loquimur de poena qua habet rationem medecina c. If we speake of that punishment which is by way of medicine we may be punished for another Such are all temporall and bodily corrections they are medicinall and tend to the good of the soule and the sonne quantum ad animam non est res patris in respect of his soule is not any thing of his father but in respect of his body Sic Thom. 1.2 quaest 87. artic 8. Contra. Although this exposition be sound and true yet it doth not fully take away the doubt moved before 1. For the Prophet Ezechiel also speaketh of temporall punishment namely of captivitie which the sonne should not beare for the father 2. And this place is rather understood of eternall punishment than temporall which the sinne of Idolatrie deserveth Simler 3. And the phrase here used visiting the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children sheweth that the Lord speaketh rather of penall judgements which should bee inflicted upon the sonnes of the wicked than of medicinall corrections 4. And Augustine further urgeth this reason that if it bee understood of temporall chastisement as of captivitie then non solum odio haebentibus sed diligentibus se redderet peccata c. God should not onely render the sinnes to those that hate him but to those that love him for Daniel and the three children and Ezechiel with other righteous men went into captivitie Sic Augustin quaest 14. quaest veter novum Testament 8. There remaineth the second common and received sense of these words which most of the fathers thus understand that the Lord will visite the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children if they also continue in the wicked race and follow the evill example of their fathers as Hierome Ideo iniquitates eorum portaverunt quia imitatores eorum in nequitia extiterunt Therefore rhey doe beare the iniquitie of their fathers because they did imitate them in their wickednesse Hieron in oration Ierem. Some agreeing in generall with the rest that it is to be expounded of the wicked children of wicked parents yet doe understand it of originall sinne which is properly called the sinne of the fathers because they received it from them which is punished in unregenerate children of the wicked but is pardoned in those that are regenerate To this purpose Gregor lib. 15. Moral cap. 22. Contra. But originall sinne is extended further than to the third and fourth generation which are here mentioned therefore it is not like the Lord meaneth that sinne Ex Simler Some will not have this place at all understood of the sinnes of the fathers but of the children onely qui peccant sicut patres which sinne as their fathers did But as Tostatus well argueth against this assertion This were not to punish the sinnes of the fathers in the children Sed peccatorum filiorum malorum in seipsos but of the wicked sonnes in themselves Tostat. quaest 5. Therefore the former exposition is currant to expound these words of the sinnes of the children which they learned of their fathers Quia patrum extiterunt aemulatores haereditario malo de radice in ramos crescente They are punished because they ded emulate their fathers this hereditarie evill growing from the root into the branches Hieron in Ezech. cap. 18. So also Augustine Ex eo quod addidit qui me oderunt c. In that he addeth which hate me it is understood that they are punished for the sinnes of their fathers Qui in cadem perversitate parentum perseverare voluerunt Which would persevere in the same perversitie of their fathers August cont Adimant cap. 7. Gregor Quisquis parentis iniquitatem non imitatur nequaquam ejus delicto gravatur Hee that imitateth not the iniquitie of his father is not burdened with his sinne lib. 15. moral cap. 22. Chrysostome Si nepos secutus fuerit vias patris avi sui c. If the nephew doe follow the wayes of his father and grandfather thou wilt render unto them to the third and fourth generation Chrysost. homil in Psal. 84. Super illa non in aeternum irasceris c. Severus Therefore it is added Of those that hate me Vt apertum fiat non ob parentum peccata sed ob illorum odium adversus Deum eos puniri That it may bee manifest that they are not punished for their fathers sinne but for their owne hatred against God Ex Lippoman Diodorus In eisdem peccatis persistentes just as poenas exolvetis Persisting in the same sinnes you shall pay just punishment Rabanus Peccata patrum iniquorum non redundant ad filios si eorum imitatores in malo non fiant The sinnes of the wicked
and thereof is called terumah an heave-offering QUEST XXXIII What is here understood by the heave-offering Vers. 28 FOr it is an heave-offering of the children of Israel 1. Some by Terumah which is a speciall name signifying an heave-offering doe understand in generall an oblation Vatarlus But the same word being in the next verse before used in a speciall signification for an heave-offering must bee also so taken here 2. Some doe take it in that speciall sense but then they restraine it only to the shoulder before spoken of which is called the shoulder of the heave-offering Osiander But it is evident in that a perpetuall Law is made for Aaron and his sonnes what part they should have of the peace-offerings and they had as well the shaken breast as the shoulder that was lifted up Levit. 27.34 that this clause must be understood of both those parts before spoken of the breast and the shoulder 3. Some by the heaving here understand only the dividing and separating of these parts which was to be made by the children of Israel So Oleaster and in the same sense the Latine Interpreter translateth primitivae sunt they are the first things that is the principall or best of the offerings of the children of Israel But the word terumah being before used in that speciall signification for an heave-offering should bee also so taken here 4. Therefore this terme terumah heave-offering is given both to the shaken breast and heaved shoulder of the more principall motion for these gifts were first of all by the Priest lifted up and presented before God in the hands of the Priest and in that respect were called an heave-offering Borrh. QUEST XXXIV Of the mysticall application of the shaking to and fro and of the breast and shoulder of the ram given unto the Priests FOr the mysticall application of these rites and ceremonies 1. In that part of the sacrifice was shaken to and fro on every side it signified Deum totius terra esse Dominum that God is Lord of the whole earth Oleaster and beside it betokened that Christi vera victimae merita beneficia c. that the merits and benefits of Christ the true sacrifice should by the preaching of the Gospell be spread abroad into all the world Borrh. But the Hebrewes exposition is fond who would have hereby signified that all men from all parts of the world should come to Jerusalem ibi optimâ aurâ fruituros there to have their health and to enjoy an wholesome aire Ex Oleastro For wee see that not by comming to Jerusalem but in departing from the earthly Jerusalem with the carnall rites thereof by preaching of the Gospell the Gentiles have received health and salvation of their soules which is more precious than the health of the body 2. In that part of the sacrifice was given unto the offerers to eat it sheweth that Christ did not only deliver himselfe unto death for us sed etiam in cibum dare c. but also giveth himselfe to be our meat nourishing us unto eternall life as he saith Ioh. 6.54 My flesh is meat indeed my bloud is drinke indeed c. Marbach 3. And in that the breast and shoulder are given unto the Priest it teacheth as Gregorie well saith Vt quod de sacrificio praecipitur sumere hoc de seipso discat authori immolare That what he is commanded to take of the sacrifice he should learne himselfe to offer unto God quod toto pectore oper◠c. that with all their heart and endevour they should watch upon their office Iun. Vt sint tanquam pectus humeri populi c. To be as the breast of the people to provide and take care for their soules and to bee as their shoulders to beare the burthen of their vocation Simler QUEST XXXV Of the consecrating of Aarons successour in his garments Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments c. 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth in the singular the holy garment but it is in the plurall bigdee garments for there was not one garment but many ten in all which were consecrated for the high Priest 2. The Priests which succeeded Aaron were not to use any other garments but those which Aaron was consecrated in as Eleazar put on Aaron priestly vesture when he was consecrated Priest in his fathers place Numb 20. Lyran. 3. And it is added shall be his sonnes after him whereby the use of these garments is not made generall to all the Priests but onely unto them which should succeed in the priesthood Cajetane 4. And this difference may be observed betweene the consecration of Aaron and his successour that Aaron in his consecration was both consecrated himselfe and his garments with him but his successour only was to be consecrated in those garments which needed not to be consecrated againe unlesse the old garments being old new were to be made in their place and then they were to be consecrated as Aarons priestly garments were at the first Tostat. quaest 13. 5. These garments the high Priest at the time of his consecration was to weare seven dayes together he was not afterward tied necessarily to weare them so long together but as his ministery and service required Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXXVI By whom the high Priests succeeding Aaron were consecrated Vers. 29. TO be consecrate therein 1. There were two high Priests consecrated extraordinarily first Aaron who received his consecration from Moses who was no Priest but only for the time executed that office in Aarons consecration secondly Eleazar was consecrated high Priest his father being yet living which was not afterward seene in any other succeeding high Priest for there could not be two high Priests together But Eleazar was consecrated his father yet living because the time of his death was certainly knowne as the Lord had shewed to Moses and immediatly after Eleazars consecration he died Numb 20 but this could not be knowne in any other high Priest 2. The rest of the high Priests which followed after Moses death were consecrated by the inferiour Priests Tistetus giveth an instance how the Pope at this day is consecrated by the Bishop of Hastia But the Gospell acknowledgeth no such high Priesthood and the Pope doth usurpe that place over other Churches therfore it is nothing to us how an usurper entreth A better instance may be given Act. 13.3 where certaine that were but Prophets and Doctors of the Church do yet lay their hands upon the Apostles Saul and Bernabas and so they did consecrate them to the worke whereunto they were called Therefore by the like example the inferiour Priests might consecrate the high Priest in the old Testament there being no other high Priest to do it QUEST XXXVII Whether Eleazar was consecrated after the manner here prescribed Vers. 30. THat sonne that shall be Priest in his stead c. Which is not understood onely of the next sonne of Aaron which should succeed him which
9.20 4. Therefore these may be the causes why Moses prayeth againe 1. The Lord granted before that he would not destroy all the people at once sed 〈◊〉 ex inâ—ervallo vel per partes but whether he would doe it in continuance of time and as it wore by peecemeale hee knew not which he prayeth for here Lippom. 2. And there might be other sinnes as well as this for the which the Lord should be angry with them as Deut. 9.18 he saith he prayed and fasted because of all their sins Tostat. 3. And now he prayeth not only for the turning away or judgements but that the Lord would be againe fully reconciled unto his people and restore them to their former state and condition of favour Simler 4. And he prayeth not only for the pardoning of their temporall punishment but against everlasting death which sinne deserveth Osiander QUEST LXXVIII What booke it was out of the which Moses wisheth to be raced Vers. 32. IF thou wilt not race me out of the booke which thou hast written 1. By this booke R. Salomon understandeth the booke of the Law as Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law hee desireth if the Lord were purposed to destroy the people that his name should not be mentioned in the Law nor he taken to be the Law-giver for to what purpose should he be spoken of as a Law-giver unto that people which was not Contra. But this is not the meaning 1. Because the bookes of the Law were not yet written Moses therefore would not desire to be raced out of a booke which was not 2. Neither would Moses aske that of God which was in his owne power to doe now Moses did write the booke of the Law and he might have left out his owne name if he would 3. Againe Moses setteth against this great benefit the safety of the people the greatest losse which he could have but this had beene no such great losse unto Moses not to have his name remembred in any such written booke 4. Moses here useth a disjunctive speech Doâ— this or else race mee c. but if he meant the racing of his name out of the booke of the Law there had beene no disjunction at all for one had followed upon the other for if Israel had beene destroyed neither should Moses have written the booke of the Law which was only given unto Israel for it had beene in vaine to give Lawes unto a people that were not 5. Moses also speaketh of a booke which God had written now Moses writ the booke of the Law the ten Commandements only were written with Gods hand Tostat. quaest 41. 2. R. Abraham Francus who writeth upon Aben Ezra understandeth the racing out of this booke of the death of the body and he addeth further that there is quaedam rota coelestâ—â— a certaine celestiall wheele wherein are many starres which worke by their influence upon those iâ—â—eriour bodies and by the moving of this wheele death or life is caused so that thus he would interpret Moses speech Cause me by the motion of this wheele to dye But seeing the motion of this wheele which he imagineth is the naturall cause as he supposeth of life and death Moses could not dye naturally before his time came and if now he should have died it had beene not a naturall death but supernaturally caused by God therefore not by the motion of any such wheele Tostat. ibid. 3. Hierom also differeth not much from this former opinion in substance understanding Moses desire of death in this life he wisheth Perire in praesentiam non in perpetnum To perish for the present not for ever But whereas the Lord afterward answereth Moses Whosoever hath sinned will I put out of my booke vers 33. it followeth that they which sinne not that is without repentance are not put out of that booke but all as well the righteous as unrighteous the just and the sinners are subject to this temporall death therefore Moses speaketh not of that 4. Hierom hath beside another opinion for upon that place Psalm 69.28 Let them bee put out of the booke of life neither let them bee written with the righteous he inferreth that God hath two bookes viventium justorum of the living and of the righteous that was the booke of the living In quo ante adventum Dei Prophetae Patriarchae scripti sunt Wherein the Prophets and Patriarkes were written before the comming of God in the flesh the other wherein the faithfull are written whereof our blessed Saviour speaketh Rejoyce because your names are written in the booke of life and of the first Moses saith he speaketh in this place So some doe understand this booke in the same sense with Hierom of the booke of Gods Covenant which hee made with Israel out of the which the Gentiles were excluded of which mention is made Ezech. 13.9 where the Lord saith that the false Prophets shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel So Moses desireth here not to be counted of the family of Israel wherein all the Prophets and Patriarkes were written But if Israel had now perished the booke of Gods Covenant with Israel likewise should have beene no more remembred therefore it had beene superfluous for Moses to desire to be raced out of that booke And againe the booke of the living mentioned in the Psalme is the same with the booke of life spoken of Apocal. 3.5 I will not put his name out of the booke of life In which booke of life not only the Prophets and Patriarkes before Christ but all the faithfull before and since are written 5. Cajetane understandeth it De libro principatuâ— in hoc mundo Of the booke of principality and preeminence in the world for it is decreed with God as in a booke Quod isto vel illi principentur in hac vita That such or such shall beare rule in this life And so Moses desireth to lose his principality and government which the Lord promised him that hee would make of him a great nation c. But whereas they which sinned only are taken out of this booke of life and yet many wicked and evill men are governours in the world it cannot be meant of any such booke or decree of principalitie or government 6. Oleaster by this booke thinketh to be understood the booke of the acts and doings of the righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 But there are many righteous men whose names and acts were not written in that booke which is now thought also to be lost therefore it had beene no great matter for Moses to wish to be put out of that booke 7. Burgensis maketh foure bookes of God 1. One is the booke of life wherein only are written the names of the Elect that are ordained unto life as when souldiers are written in the muster booke which are pressed and appointed for warre 2. That also may be called the booke
also is in the same minde Faciem Dei juxta naturae sua proprietatem nulla videt creatura No creature can see the face of God in the propertie of his owne nature 6. But whereas Iacob saith I have seene God face to face Gen. 32.30 which is here denied unto Moses Thomas Aquinas well interpreteth that place that whereas it is said that Iacob saw God face to face Referendum est non ad ipsam essentiam sed ad figuram in quo representabatur Deus It must be referred not unto the essence of God but unto that figure wherein God was represented c. Otherwise it is not to be doubted but that Moses saw more than Iacob did and there is no question but that this was the most cleere sensible vision of Gods glorie that is to be found in all the old Testament for none of the Fathers saw the Lords back-parts but only Moses Oleast yet neither Iacob there nor Moses here saw the divine essence Nunc majus aliquid prastantius obtinet non tamen ut Deum perfecte videat c. Moses obtained a more excellent thing than Iacob yet not to see God perfectly as he is in himselfe but as the capacitie of humane nature was able to beare Calvin 7. Alcuinus giveth this reason why Moses when it is said the Lord spake with Moses face to face saw not the divine essence for then hee would not have said afterward Ostende mihi teipsum Shew me thy selfe or thy glorie Apparuit ergo ei Deus in ea specie qua voluerat non ipse autem apparuit illi natura propria God therefore appeared unto him in that manner hee would not in his owne nature c. 8. Simlerus addeth further hee saw onely the back-parts of God Non vidit igitur naturam substantiam Therefore he saw not his nature and substance And whereas notwithstanding the Lord is said to have talked with Moses face to face that is only to shew a difference betweene that cleere vision which Moses had and other visions shewed to other Prophets not so cleere Simler 9. Lyranus then here is deceived who affirmeth that though the vision or sight of the divine essence was not now granted to Moses Tamen alias fuit concessa in vita praesenti Yet it was granted at another time in this life present But the reason here used by the Lord that no man can see God and live is generall excluding all men while they live here from the vision of Gods nature and essence And as Tostatus reasoneth Non videtur esse aliud tempus inconvenientius c. There seemeth no time to be more convenient for Moses to see Gods essence in than this when Moses made that request unto God qu. 17. yet Tostatus likewise is deceived who thinketh that Moses at this time did see the divine essence QUEST XLIX Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live Vers. 20. THere shall no man see me and live 1. Gregorie Nyssenus giveth this sense of this place not that the sight of that glorious face should be the cause of death Nam quomodo vitae facies causa mortis esse poterit For how should the face of life be the cause of death to those that approach or come neere unto it But to shew because the divine nature exceedeth all knowledge that he which thinketh God to be any of those things which are seene and knowne vitam non habet hath no life Non est ergo vita quod cognoscitur That then is not life which is seene or knowne and so cannot give life c. Hee maketh then in effect this to be the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live thinke not that which thou seest of one to be God able to give life But the Lord speaketh here not of any inward opinion but of the present sight and contemplation of God which Moses decreed and by face he meaneth not any thing beside himselfe that is seene of him but his essence and nature that which himselfe is no man can see that and live 2. Procopius seemeth to approve this sense that they which live here according to the flesh cannot see God but they may see him Non secundum carnem ambulantes Which walke not according to the flesh But Procopius may answer himselfe by a distinction that there is prima Dei facies the first face of God which is his divine essence which is indeed invisible neâ—ini mortalium visa and never seene of any mortall creature there is secunda Dei facies as second face of God which is his grace and favour which is seene by faith of this sight of God our blessed Saviour speaketh Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God c. But the Lord speaketh here of the sight of his first face which is invisible for Moses lived not according to the flesh and yet he is denied this sight and afterward he is granted to see the back-parts which he could not have seene if he had beene carnall not spirituall 3. Rupertus thinketh that as before the Lord spake unto Moses in the person of the people Pro parte electorum In respect of the elect among them I will cause all my good to goe before thee so he speaketh this pro parte reproborum in regard of the reprobate and wicked among them that they should not see Gods glorie and live because they were appointed to die So Rupertus maketh the force of this speech to consist in the word Then thou canst not see my face that is the wicked and unbeleevers among the people But this exposition cannot stand 1. Because the reason is generall No man shall see me and live no man whatsoeveâ— 2. The emphasis lyeth in the word face for his back-parts it is granted Moses to see 3. And the Lord meaneth here Moses person not in him the person of the people as the whole narration following sheweth how the Lord would put Moses in a cleft of a rocke and cover him with his hand while he passed by c. 4. Another exposition is this Qui ex opposito Deum aspicit non vivet He which doth see Gods face as opposite and comming against him shall not live Discat homo Deum sequi Let a man seeke to follow God c. not as it were to meet God in the face or to oppose himselfe against him for vice is opposite to vertue So also Gregor Nyssen 5. Augustine thus interpreteth No man can see God and live Nemo potest eum in hac vita videre vivens sicuti est No man can see him while he liveth in this life as he is So also Lyranus Vatab. Iun. annot But thâ—n this should onely be a repetition of the same thing Thou canst not see my face for no man living can see my face It better containeth a reason of the Lords former answer why Moses could not see
verse the negative particle lo not must be supplyed which is but once in the beginning of the verse expressed This interpretation we preferre before either that of the Hebrewes 1. who referre this verse to that which followeth and joyne it not with that which goeth before but make this sense that as yet there were no plants or herbs that appeared above the earth but lay yet hid till God sent raine whereby the earth was prepared for the creation of man and the plants watered so R. Sel. But this is a vaine conceit for upon the third day trees were made which appeared above the earth and the earth having beene so lately covered with the waters was yet moist enough 2. Either that of Eugubinus who saith it rained the second day and then the plants were brought forth the third for upon the second day the waters were gathered together from covering the earth so that no raine was then needfull 3. Mercerus distinguisheth the times the 5. verse hee understandeth of the first growing of the plants in the creation which was done without raine or dew but the 6. verse hee referreth to that ordinary course which God appointed afterward by dewes and raines to refresh the earth 4. Musculus will have the 6. verse of the ascending of vapours to be understood of the very time of creation that God used those helps of nature but this were to tye God unto meanes wherefore I take it with Iunius to be an explanation of the former verse that it had neither yet rained nor any mist had ascended when God onely by his word caused the plants to grow out of the earth this is the exposition of R. Saadia which Kimâ—i preferreth before all the rest QVEST. IX Whether Paradise were terrestriall Vers. 8. THe Lord planted a garden eastward in Eden c. Hierome readeth for eastward à principiâ— from the beginning whereas the word is Kedem the East translated by the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that Hieromes conceit that God made Paradise before the heaven and earth tradit in 2. gen is grounded upon the false interpretation of this place and how could Paradise which was upon the earth be planted before the earth was founded 2. Their conceit is removed that imagine Paradise to bee no terrene or corporall place but to be spiritually understood as Philo lib. de mund opâ—fic and Origen whom Epiphanius confuteth by this reason that where there are true rivers as Euphrates which is confessed of all to bee one of the rivers of Paradise where were also very trees and plants there Paradise must bee a terrestriall place epist. ad Ioann Hierosâ—l 3. Neither can the whole earth be taken for Paradise as some have thought because it is said here to bee planted in Eden which was the name of a speciall country Esech 27.23 Harah Canneth Eden are joyned together QVEST. X. Where Paradise was situate LIkewise for the situation of Paradise 1. it was neither in a remote place beyond the Ocean which opinion is attributed to Ephrem 2. nor a place higher than all the earth Damasc. lib. 2. de fid orthodox c. 14. 3. nor next unto heaven as Rupertus de Trinitat c. 37. 4. nor reaching up to the Moone as some other have imagined 5. nor in the aire though not so high as the Moone as Alexander Hales and Tostatus 6 nor under the Equinoctiall Bonavent in 2. senten c. 17. for these rivers Tigris and Euphrates which flowed out of Paradise and the country Eden where Paradise was came not neare the Equinoctiall and they are knowne to be in Asia not in any remote and unknowne countrey in earth not in the aire or next to the Moone All these are ridiculous childish fancies and need no long confutation QVEST. XI Of the tree of life Vers. 9. THe tree of life c. 1. This was a visible tree planted in the midst of Paradise in a visible place not spiritually or allegorically to be understood as Origen thinketh 2. neither is it called the tree of life because it was able to give immortality and to preserve from death for ever as Tostatus or onely because it was able to preserve man from death till such time as hee should bee translated to immortality as Scotus in 2. lib. sent dist 19. qu. 1. and Thomas with others 4. Neither need it bee disputed whether the tree of life had this power to preserve from death by a supernaturall gift as Bonaventure or by a naturall faculty as Hugo Thomas Pererius upon this place 5. For it is evident that this tree had no power to give immortality at all by the taste of the fruit thereof 1. because that no corruptible food can make the body incorruptible but the fruit of this tree could not nourish nature without corruption and alteration and without nourishment it could not give life to the body 2. Againe man had by his creation power given him to dye if he had not sinned wherfore immortality was the gift of his creation not effect of the eating of the tree 3. And if it could have giveÌ„ immortality it must have had a power to preserve from sin for by sinning man became mortall so that if it could not defend him from sin it was no more the tree of life in regard of the effect than any other tree of the garden for if he had not sinned he should not have dyed what fruit soever he had eaten of that only tree of knowledge of good and evill excepted 6. Then our opinion is this that it was called the tree of life not so much for the operation though we confesse it might give strength and vertue also to the body Mercer but chiefly for the signification because it was both a signe of life received from God and a symbole of Christ who is our true life and herein we approve rather the opinion of Augustine Eugubinus in Cosmopeia who thinketh it was called the tree of life not effective but significative not effectually but significatively as a signe of true immortality which he should receive of God if he continue in obedience First it is the tree of life as the other was of knowledge of good and evill which was not so called because it gave knowledge but was a seale unto them of their miserable knowledge which they should get by experience in their transgression Magister lib. 3. distinct 17. therefore the tree of life must be so called because it was a seale and pledge of life secondly thus the Scripture significatively and simbolically expoundeth the tree of life Prov. 5.18 Wisdome which is Christ is a tree of life Revel 2.7 To him that overcommeth will I give to eat of the tree of life see more of this Synops 17. cont err 5. QVEST. XII Of the tree of knowledge of good and evill vers 9. THe tree of knowledge of good and evill First we affirme that this was a visible materiall tree not
idlely without labour yet his labour should have beene pleasant rather for delight than necessity Mercer QVEST. XXVII Of the growing of Thistles Vers. 18. THornes also and thistles c. 1. The earth should have brought forth thornes and thistles before but now it bringeth them forth as noxious and hurtfull to man 2. And whereas he is bid to eat the herbe of the field this is neither interlaced as a consolation as Calvin for all this here uttered belongeth unto mans punishment neither is man here deprived of the eating of all other fruit saving hearbs But here the Lord sheweth how man had deserved by his sinne to bee deprived of the pleasant fruâ—t of Paradise and to live of the herb as other bruit beasts though by herb corne is especially signified ordained for the use of man 3. But where mention is made of the sweat of the browes by this particular all other kinde of labour in severall vocations as of Magistrates Ministers handi-crafts men is implied Luther Likewise under one kinde of labour and sorrow all other miseries and cares of this life are comprehended Calvin 4. Yet God sheweth mercie in infflicting of these punishments in turning them from eternall to temporall 5. And whereas the Lord giveth this as a reason that man should returne to dust because he was taken out of it this is not so to be understood as though he should have turned to dust if hee had not sinned for as S. Paul sheweth death came in by sinne Adam should have beene translated and changed as Henoch and Elias were and they shall be that remaine alive at the comming of Christ. But while man stood in his integrity and happinesse he remembred not his terrene beginning as hee considered not his nakednesse but now the Lord maketh it an argument of his mortall condition and bringeth it to his remembrance to humble him thereby Mercer QVEST. XXVIII Why Eva is called the mother of the living Vers. 20. ANd the man called his wives name Hevah 1. Neither as Lyranus thinketh is she so called because she was the mother of all which live in sorrow and miserie 2. Neither as Rupertus that Adam of incredulity so named her not beleeving that shee should returne to dust as the Lord had said but that he and his posterity should live 3. Neither need we referre it to the birth of Christ who brought true life into the world the woman cannot be truly said to be the mother of the spirituall life she was the mother of him that was the Author of spirituall life 4. And it is but a fond conceit to derive Ave the first word of the Angels salutation to Marie of Eva as though she repaired what was lost by Eva for the one is a Latine word the other Hebrew neither did the Angell say Ave all haile but the translater and the right word is not Eva but Hevah 5. Neither is Adam here to be noted of insolency and pride that having received sentence of death doth give unto the woman a name of life but Adam being confirmed by Gods promise concerning the seed of the woman that although they themselves were mortall yet by them mankinde should be propagated so calleth his wife 6. But the conceit of R Levi here hath no ground that shee is called the mother of all living that is of bruâ—t beasts in respect of the stupidity and dulnesse of her minde for by living man is here understood as sometime he is called flesh because of his excellencie among the rest 7. Neither was this name given unto Eva before they had sinned when Adam gave the names to the rest of the creatures as Pererius thinketh with the Hebrewes nor yet was it given so long after when he had some children as some other thinke but the name was given at such time and place as is here set downe before Adam called her Ishah as if you should say Mannesse as a name of the whole sex but here he calleth her Hevah as by her proper name so that these words because she was the mother of all living were not the words of Adam who yet by prophesie did foresee that it should so bee but Moses inserteth this sentence Mercer QVEST. XXIX What the coats of skinnes were which God made for Adam and Eve Vers. 21. VNto Adam also and his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins and cloathed them 1. These coats of skinnes were not their bodies as Origen with some other of the fathers seeme to thinke for God had made man before of the dust of the earth cap. 2.7 2. Neither were these coats made of the barkes of trees as Barcephas and Gregor Nazianzane for the Hebrew word gnor is no where found in that sense 3. Neither is Theodorets reason sound that they could not bee the skinnes of beasts which were created but two and two and so if any of them had beene slaine the generation of that kinde should have beene hindred for that there were no more created but two of a sort is not extant in Scripture 4. Neither need we imagine with Hugo that these skinnes might be made of the Elements or some other matter we are not to runne to miracles where an ordinary course is offered 5. Some would have these skinnes made of sheepes wooll but that is not skinnes 6. Ionathan of the Serpents skin but this is too curious 7. Neither did the Lord onely teach man how to make him garments for his necessary use afterward for the text is that he cloathed them that is actually presently 8. Therefore there is no inconveniencie to say that God caused skins whether of slaine beasts or otherwise by the ministery of his Angels or how else it pleased him to be brought to Adam whereof he made them coats QVEST. XXX Why God cloathed man in beasts skinnes ANd thus it pleased God to cloath man not for any such typicall signification as either to betoken the incarnation of Christ that was cloathed with our flesh or the cloathing of the nakednesse of the soule by repentance But for these causes 1. to shew him how his mortall body might bee defended from cold and other injuries which use of skinne or leather cloathing was first used in the world 2. To cover his nakednesse for comelinesse sake and therefore the Chalde Paraphrast calleth them vestimenta honoris garments of honour 3. To teach man that it was lawfull to use the beasts as for meat so for cloathing 4. And to give a rule that modest and decent not costly or sumptuous apparell should be used 5. And that he might know what difference is betweene Gods works and mans invention betweene coats of leather and figge leaves 6. And to put him in minde of mortality by his cloathing of dead beasts skins as Origen well noteth talib indici oportebat peccatorem ut essent mortalitatis indicium QVEST. XXXI How Adam is said to become as God Vers. 22. BEhold man is
Never any man in earth Christ onely excepted kept the Sabbath without sin the Apostle saith He that is entred into his rest hath also ceased from his owne workes as God did from his Heb. 4.10 it is the rest onely of Christ where there shall be cessation from all the workes of sinne But that rest which Adam should have kept in Paradise was not Christs rest therefore he kept no rest there without sin he fell then before the Sabbath 10. That place lastly maketh to this purpose Psal. 49.13 Adam lodged not one night in honour for so are the words if they be properly translated the word is lun which signifieth to lodge or stay all night and thus divers of the Rabbines doe expound this place of Adam Upon these reasons it seemeth most probable that Adam did not continue one night in Paradise but fell in the same day of his creation Of this opinion are Irenaeus Cyrillus Epiphanius Moses Barcephas Philoxenus Ephrem with others rehearsed by Pererius upon this place though he himselfe be of another opinion That objection that so much businesse as the giving of names to the creatures by Adam the temptation of Eva by the Serpent and seduction of Adam by woman could not be dispatched in so small a time of six or seven houres may easily bee answered 1. It is evident by the text that the imposition of names was performed the day of his creation before the woman was made Gen. 2.20 and it asked no long time in regard of the singular wisdome and knowledge of Adam who was able at the first sight of the creatures without any long search or triall of their nature to give them fit names 2. Of Satans nimblenesse in hastening the tentation and insinuating himselfe to the woman there need bee made no doubt the celerity and agility of spirits is great 3. It was the coole of the day about the Eventide when sentence was given against Adam so that in the space of eight or nine houre from his creation to his fall all these matters might easily be done QVEST. XXXIII Whether Adam was cast out Vers. 24. THâ—â— hee cast out man c. 1. Where the Septuagint adde and placed him before Paradise whereupon some writers have descanted of the causes why Adam was placed before Paradise that by the sight thereof he remembring from whence he was fallen might more effectually repent his sinne the originall is otherwise that not Adam but the Cherubims were placed before Paradise 2. Whereas Theodoret thinketh that these Cherubims were not Angels but certaine terrible visions set to feare man from that passage it may be otherwise gathered out of Scripture where wee read that the Cherubims pictured over the Arke were beautifull faces representing Angels and therefore the Prophet compareth the king of Titus glittering in his pretious stones to the Cherub Ezech. 28.14 3. Concerning the fiery shaken sword we refuse 1. either the collection of Tertullian who taketh it for torrida zâ—â—a the parching countrie under the aequinoctiall or of Liranus who would have it to be a certaine wall of fire about Paradise or of Rupertus that understandeth it of purgatorie fire for all these are deceived about the translation the word signifieth not a fiery sword shaken but rather a sharp sword shaken as the Chaldâ— paraphrast readeth which by the shaking seemeth to glitter as the flame of fire or because the word Lahat signifieth to inflame it is not unlike but that some fierie inflammation in the likenesse of a sword might be set as a terrour in that place Iun. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Spirits have power to possesse bodies and speake out of them WHereas Satan useth the serpent and out of his trunke frameth a voice we neede not thinke it strange that the Devill hath this power to possesse the bodies of beasts and to speake out of them which though Iulâ—aâ— the Apostata counted a fable Cyrillus learnedly sheweth the like to have beene done out of the heathen writers as how in Homer Achilles horse inspired by Iuno foretelleth his death Pâ—rphyrius writeth that the river Causus saluted Pythagoras saying Ave Pythagora and Phylostratus that a certaine Elme saluted Apollonius Isogonus Cithiensis saith that in Rhodeâ— a certaine bull consecrate to Iupiter did speake The Pagans therefore and Atheists finding the like in their owne writers have no reason to deride this storie of the Devils speaking in the serpent Perer. 2. Doct. Adam and Eva sinned not before they were tempted WHereas Satan was the first that inveigled the woman with ambitious desire saying yee shall bee as Gods vers 5. The opinion of Prosper is discovered not to be sound that our first parents were tickled with pride before the tentation and therefore were permitted of God to fall into it for this difference is made betweene the sinne of man and of the Angels he fell being seduced but the other of their owne pride without a seducer transgressed 3. Doct. Adam if he had not sinned should not have died Vers. 19. DVst thou art and to dust thou shalt returne hence it is gathered that death was not naturall to man but hapned because of sinne contrary to the opinion of Iosephus that thinketh that man should have died though he had not sinned but his life should have beene much longer It was the opinion also of the Pelagians that death was in mans nature and sprang not from sinne Not much differing is the sentence of the Popish writers that man was created mortall by the condition of his nature yet preserved by a supernaturall gift the contrary is evident from hence because it was never said to man before he had sinned that he should returne to dust 4. Doct. The Trinity proved out of the Old Testament Vers. 22. BEhold the man is become as one of us This is an evident place against the Iewes to prove the Trinity for here the Lord speaketh of more than one neither can it be answered that it is but a phrase of speech to use the plurall for the singular for here is more than a phrase this speech could not be true to say one of vs if there were no more than one person in the God-head 5. Doct. Why God suffered Adam to be tempted and fall FUrther whereas the question will be demanded how it stood with Gods justice and holinesse to suffer man to be tempted whom he foresaw should fall Our answer is this 1. we say with the Apostle O the deepenesse of the riches both of the wisdome and knowledge of God! how vnsearchable are his judgements and his waies past finding out Râ—m 11.33 And Augustine maketh the same answer to this question Altitudinem consiliâ—eâ—us penetrare non possum c. I cannot enter into the depth of Gods counsell 2. Yet for as much as God had given man free-will and sufficient strength to resist this tentation if he would it was fit he should be left to
exercise his strength as Augustine againe saith Administrat omâ—ia qua creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios motus exercere sinat God doth so governe all things which he created that yet hee suffereth them to exercise their owne motions 3. God might justly suffer this to be done because hee did know how to turne Adams fall unto good Deuâ— permisit hominem tentari quâ—m sciebut esse casurum quid simul videbat eo casu sâ—â—â—ti posse ad misericordiam c. God suffered man to be tempted whom he knew should fall because he saw how to use his fall to declare his mercy and justice while he justly punished some out of the same damned masse and delivered others in mercy Doct. VI. Adam not damned WHereas v. 15. a promise is made concerning Christ that the seede of the woman should breake the serpents head from hence we infer that our first patents though they sinned yet were by faith in the Messiah to come restored and not utterly condemned which was the heresie of the Tatiaâ—es August de haeres c. 23. In the booke of wisdome we read that wisdome preserved the first father of the world and brought him out of his offence c. 10.1 which is agreeable to the Canonicall scripture because Adam is called the sonne of God Luke 3.38 he was not then the child of death and hell everlastingly to perish Doct. VII Wherein Adam transgressed NOw because carnall men doe extenuate Adams sinne that he was cast out of Paradise for eating an apple I will briefly shew the greatnes of our first parents transgression wherein many sins concurred 1. There was in them both incredulitie in not beleeving Gods words to be true 2. Vnthankfulnesse in not being contented with their estate 3. Pride in desiring to be like unto God 4. Wantonnes in sinning without any necessitie having all the trees in the garden beside to eare of 5. There was the sinne of gluttonie in pampering the desire of the belâ—â—e 6. Disobedience in transgressing the commandement 7. Curiositie in coveting to know the operation of the fruit in bringing them to knowledge 8. Presumption in that they presumed of Gods mercie that they should not die though they did eate 9. Then followed the concupiscence and rebellion of the flesh in being ashamed of their nakednesse 10. They excused their sinne 11. They are guiltie of homicide in bringing death not only upon themselves but all their posteritie 12. Beside Eva seduced her husband 13. Adam sinned in his inordinate affection to his wife in listning to her 14. The easines of the commandemeÌ„t maketh the transgression more heinous as Augustine well noteth answering to this question why God forbad them to eate of that tree Si bona est quare non tango si mala est quare in Paradise ideo in Paradiso est quia bona est sed nolâ— tangâ—â— quiâ— obedienteÌ„ te volâ— if it be good why doe I not touch it if it be evill why is it in Paradise therefore it is in paradise because it is good but I will not have thee touch it because I would have thee obedient God could not then make better triall of mans obedience than in forbidding that which was good Places of confutation Confut I. Infidelity not pride the first sinne of our parent 1. THe opinion of the Popish writers is that pride was the first sinne that Eva was tempted unto because Satan saith unto them yee shall bee as gods but it is rather evident that their first sinne was infidelitie first Satan telleth them ye shall not die at all and so perswadeth them not to give credit to the word of God for if they had verely beleeved that to come to passe which was threatned they would never have given any credit to Satan Confut. II. Our parents lost not their faith 2. BEllarmine also holdeth that our first parents in their transgression lost their faith because by the seducement of Satan they beleeved not what God said unto them ye shall not die Ans. 1. It followeth not if in this one act of faith they failed that therefore totally their faith was extinguished he that shal be seduced in one article or point of faith is he presently stripped of all faith 2. It was no formall infidelitie as though wittingly they rejected Gods word but they were materially deceived onely and their sudden violent affection over-shadowed their knowledge judgement 3. So Peter denied Christ through feare and frailtie yet in his judgement he could not so at once cast off all opinion of Christ hâ—s faith was shaken and winnowed but it failed not as our Saviour testifieth of him that he had praied for him that his faith faile not Luke 23.22 and so was the case in our first parents Confut. III. Not Marie but Christ brake the serpents head 3. vers 15. THe vulgar latine translation readeth shee shall breake thy head c. which the Popish writers understand of the virgin Mary as Pererius doubteth not to give this marginal note B. virgo contrivit caput serpentis the blessed Virgin did break the head of the serpent and Bellarmine also justifieth this translation whereas in the original it is his ipsum it in the neuter gender which must be referred to seed the Septuagint and the Chalde read he in the masculine understanding it of Christ for none else but Christ broke the serpents head Confut. IIII. The tree of life could not actually give life but was a symbole of it 4. vers 22. LEst he take of the tree of life and live for ever Bellarmine would proove from hence that this tree by eating the fruit therof might bring true immortalitie Ans. 1. As the Lord saith by way of derision man is become as one of vs to know good and evill So in the same sense is this other part of the sentence uttered that as a man simply thought to get knowledge by eating of the one so he might imagine to obtaine life by the other 2. For if Adam might have lived by eating of this tree now after he had sinned how would that other saying have taken effect in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Gen. 2.17 These speeches had beene contrarie the one to the other 3. It was therefore the tree of life as the other was of the knowledge of good and evill that is significative non effective not in operation â—ut in signification it was a signe or symbole of life received from God and by Gods gift should have beene â—reserved if a man had not sinned and therefore man beeing deprived of life lost also the signe thereof Places of Exhortation and practice 1. WE have here set forth unto us from v. 1. to v. 7. the degrees of tentation 1. the suggestion of Satan 2. delectation the woman saw the tree was pleasant c. 3. Consent shee tooke of the fruit 4. The effecting of the thing desired shee did eate
Hebrew ach to be read as an adversative as Paulus Burgensis readeth veruntamen notwithstanding as though the sense should be this though yee are permitted to shed the bloud of beasts yet it is unlawfull for you to shed the bloud of man 3. Neither is this another exception concerning mans food as Cajetane that as before the bloud of beasts is excepted so here humane flesh that if it be not lawfull to shed the bloud of man neither is it to eat his flesh which first must be kiâ—led before it be eaten 4. Neither need there to be here understood any sentence as this I will not have you to shed mans bloud and then this to follow as a reason for this prohibition to shed mans bloud followeth directly in the next verse 5. But this word translated for may be read as a causall why God would have them abstaine from all cruelty or savage behaviour in eating of the bloud of beasts that they should have a greater detestation of the spilling or shedding of mans bloud Perer. Mercer QVEST. VII How God will require the bloud of man at the hand of beasts Vers. 5. AT the hand of every beast 1. Rupertus by beast understandeth the Devill that shall answer for the death of mens soules but Moses here directly speaketh of the bodily life which is in the spirits and bloud 2. Neither by beasts here are understood cruell and beastiall men for it followeth afterward aâ— the hands of man will I require it c. 3. Neither doth Moses insinuate the death of martyrs which were exposed to beasts for which the persecutors shall answer for that did cast the Saints before the beasts 4. But here is shadowed forth that Law which was afterward published that even the beast that killeth a man should be stoned Exod. 22. QVEST. VIII How his bloud shall be shed that sheddeth bloud Vers. 6. BY man shall his bloud be shed 1. Some reade in homine and referre it to the first clause Hee that sheddeth mans bloud in man as they which are strangled have their bloud shed as it were in them sic Tostatus but in this sense one kinde of murther onely should be prohibited 2. Some read in homine against man that is in despite of man Cajetan 3. But the best reading is per hominem by man and to referre it to the last clause by man shall his bloud be shed that is by the Magistrate as the Chalde interpreteth by witnesse by the sentence of the Iudge for it should seeme that before the floud there was no law made nor power given to man to punish murther as Adam proceeded not against Cain that killed his brother Abel Mercer 4. And this must be understood not de facto sed de jure merito not of the fact for many times murtherers escape but of the right and due desert of murtherers that they are by Gods Law worthy of death and many times where the law of man faileth that such are not executed Gods vengeance overtaketh them such are either slaine in battell or by the hands of other or by some other meanes as it is in the Psalme men of bloud shall not live halfe their daies Psalm 55.24 Calvin QVEST. IX That mans life should be preserved because of Gods image IN the image of God c. 1. Hence it followeth not as Oleaster collecteth that the image of God is in mans body because the image in the soule cannot be by the killing of the body destroyed for the reason concludeth well though this image of God be not in the body yet because the body is the Tabernacle of the soule and beareth that which beareth the image of God it ought for that cause to be reverenced and yet the image of God though not originally or principally yet by the consequent and effects is expressed and shineth in some sort in mans body in that it is made upright and aspiring to celestiall things and so sutable to the soule and in regard that into the hand of man God hath delivered the rule and dominion of the creatures cap. 1. vers 28. 2. Though the image wherein man was created be much decayed and impaired yet some part thereof remaineth for the which the life of man should be spared and preserved Calvin 3. And if for this reason the life of any man whatsoever should be regarded much more the life of Christians in whom this image is renewed in Christ Muscul. QVEST. X. Of the Raine Bow Vers. 13. I Have set my bow in the cloud c. 1. Neither Ambrose conceit can be admitted who understandeth not here the visible Raine-Bow in the clouds but the invisible power of God whereby he sometime intendeth sometime remitteth his judgements as a bow is bent and unbent againe But this collection is contrary to the text which saith The Bow shall be seene in the cloud vers 14. 2. Neither is their opinion found that thinke there was neither raine noâ— Raine-Bow before the floud for how could the plants and fruits of the earth have beene so many yeares preserved without raine so then the Raine-Bow was before the floud but it beganne onely now to be a signe of this covenant betweene God and man as the Lord chuseth sometime naturall things for signes as Bread and Wine and Water in the Sacraments Mercer 3. Neither is the opinion of some Hebrewes to be admitted that thinke the Raine-Bow to have beene before the floud but then it appeared in the cleare aire now in a cloud for the iris or Bow can have no existence or being but in a dewing or stilling cloud Mercer 4. Neither is Thomas Aquinas judgement and Cajetanus sound which thinke that the Râ—ine-Bow is partly a naturall signe that there shall be no floud because the Raine-bow sheweth not but when the clouds are thinne and dispersed whereas thicke and blacke clouds ingender inundations for the causes of the generall floud were not naturall and God without the clouds by the overflowing onely of the waters could drowne the world and beside if the Rain-bow were a naturall signe then before the floud came it might have prognosticated so much but then it should have beene a lying signe for notwithstanding the Raine bowes often appearing before the deluge as it is like the floud came 5. Though the Raine-bow bee not a naturall signe but voluntary depending upon the will and institution of God yet notwithstanding hath it some agreement with that which it is made a signe of like as baptisme in the flesh hath some resemblance of the soule so the Raine-bow is a fit and convenient signe to portend no inundation likely to follow because it is orâ—inarily a signe either of faire weather or of no long raine And it hath beene observed that a Raine-bow in the morning betokeneth showers in the evening faire weather Beside the Raine-bow is found to be wholesome to plants and herbs that where it lighteth it giveth them a more pleasant and
Some of jarah to teach because there the law and heavenly doctrine was taught 5. Oleaster fetcheth it from mar bitter because of the bitter griefe of Abraham offering his sonne 6. But we neede not goe far for the derivation of this word Abraham sheweth the originall to be from raah to see not because it was a conspitious hill and easie to bee seeâ— or because it was the countrey of the seers and prophets Lyppoman but because the lord was there seene of Abraham and did provide for him Iun. QVEST. VI. The greatnesse of Abrahams tentation in the sacrificing of Isaack 2. TAke now thine onely sonne Many difficulties doe concurre in this tentation of Abraham 1. He saith not take thy servant but thy sonne Muscul. 2. The only sonne If hee had had many tâ—e griefe had beene the lesse but now Isaack was his onely sonne Ismael being abdicated and sent away Calvin 2. It is added whom thou lovest c. Isaack was a vertuous and obedient child and Abraham loved him so much the more if he had beene an ungracious sonne the griefe had beene much lesse Calvin 4. yea he is bid to offer Isaack of whom the Lord said in Isaack shall thy seed bee called so that Abrahams hope of posterity by this meanes and the expectation even of all those promises made in Isaack are cut off Origen 5. Ipse primus author inusitati exempli c. Abraham must be first Author of an unwonted example in sacrificing humane flesh Philo 6. He is bid with his owne hands to kill him to be the executioner himselfe Muscul. 7. Hee must offer him for a burnt offering that no memory or monuments should remaine of him but he should be consumed to ashes Perer. 8. He must not doe it presently but he taketh a journey of three dayes all which time his soule is tormented with griefe and care dum ambulat dum iter agit cogitationibus animus ejus discerpitur while he walketh upon the way his mind is as torn in sunder with these thoughts Origen hom 7. in Genes 9. It must bee done upon a mountaine in the view and sight of the world if a secret place had beene permitted for this sacrifice it had been more tolerable Marlorat 10. But the greatest conflict of all was in that the Messiah was promised to come of Isaack sic in ejus persona perire videbatur tota mundi salus and so the safety and salvation of the world did seeme to perish in his person Calvin QVEST. VII How Abraham knew that it was God that bad him sacrifice his sonne Vers. 3. THen Abraham rose up early c. 1. It appeareth that the Lord spake not unto Abraham by dreame in his sleep but being awake both because Abraham rose up in the night to addresse himselfe to his businesse he staied not till he was awaked out of his sleepe as also this being so hard and unaccustomed charge it was requisite that Abraham should have beene in the plainest manner spoken unto that without all ambiguity he might acknowledge it to be Gods voyce Cajetan 2. Now Abraham knew it to be Gods voyce partly by that experience which hee had of such heavenly conferences that he knew it as well as he discerned Sarahs voyce when she spake partly the Patriarkes and Prophets by the cleere light and illumination of their soules did understand such visions to be of God as the soule naturally discerneth of certaine generall notions and principles but in these dayes there being no such cleare light of illumination it is hard to judge of visions without some speciall direction better certainty out of Gods word 3. Wherefore Abraham nothing doubting but that God spake unto him did easily overcome all other troublesome thoughts As that it might seeme an unnaturall and cruell part for the father to kill his owne sonne and that God did appeare to be contrary to himselfe in commanding him to be killed in whom Abraham was promised to bee blessed and increased the first doubt Abraham was satisfied in because nothing which God commandeth can be against nature seeing he is the author of nature although God may worke against the ordinary course of nature And like as God hath inflicted death justly upon all both good and bad so at Gods speciall bidding to take away mans life is not mans act but Gods and therefore just Against the other doubt Abrahams faith prevailed for hee doubted not but that God was able to raise up Isaack againe from the dead Heb. 11.9 QVEST. VIII Of the distance of the mount Moreah from Beersheba Vers. 3. THe third day Abraham lift up his eyes 1. Neither doe I thinke with Tostatus that this mountaine Moriah was under 20. miles and so not a dayes journey from Beersheba where Abraham dwelt and that hee as full of care and griefe went but an easie pace for it was most like that hee which rose up so early assoone as the Commandement was given him would make all haste also to performe it 2. Neither need wee thus to reckon the dayes with Perer. that the first day must be accounted that which went before whereof the night was a part wherein God spake to Abraham and so hee travelled but one whole day for this seemeth to bee against the text that counteth the third day from Abrahams setting forth 3. Therefore I approve rather Hieromes opinion which thinketh that from Gerar to mount Moriah it was three dayes journey and so we need not force the letter of the Scripture QVEST. IX How the mountaine Moriah was shewed to Abraham Vers. 4. SAw the place afarre off 1. Abraham knew not this mountaine by a pillar of fire upon it at some Hebrewes thinke nor by any externall visible meanes 2. neither by any vision or dreame for in the last vision the Lord said which I will shew thee v. 2. 3. but it is most like that God shewed it him by some secret instinct as he used to speake to his Prophets and as David was shewed to Samuel 2 Sam. 16.12 QVEST. X. In what sense Abraham saith to his servants we will come againe Vers. 5. ANd come againe unto you 1. Neither doth Abraham here utter an untruth saying they would come againe whereas he in his minde purposed to sacrifice Isaack 2. neither doth he so speak including a secret condition si Deus voluerit if God will Thom. Angli for Abraham knew the will of God was otherwise that Isaack should be sacrificed 3. neither was this a figurative speech in using the singular for the plurall as though Abraham should meane only himselfe for he meaneth his sonne directly I and my child c. 4. neither yet doth Abraham speake so cunningly or captiously captiose loquâ—batur c. lest any of his servants knowing his businesse should have gone about to hinder it as Ambr. lib. 1. de Abraham c. 8.5 nor yet did Abraham so speake because he knew God would raise up Isaack againe to life as
Origen hom 8. Genes The Apostle only saith that he considered that God was able to raise him up even from the dead but that God would doe it so presently he knew not neither had it beene such a triall of his faith to sacrifice his sonne if hee had beene sure that his sonne should in that instant have beene restored againe to life 6. I thinke rather that Abraham being generally by faith assured of Gods power yet was ignorant in this particular what would fall out and therefore spake as a man amazed and astonished and yet ignorantly prophesied Prophetavit quod ignoravit Ambr. Iun. QVEST. XI Of Abrahams constancy and Isaacks obedience Vers. 7. MY Father c. 1. Abrahams setled constancy appeareth that notwithstanding these amiable words of his sonne yet cannot be turned from his purpose nomina vâ—tae solent operarigratiam non ministerium necis words of life as to call father sonne doe insinnuate grace and savour they minister occasion of death 2. Isaacks obedience is commended who willingly submitteth himselfe 1. beeing now 25 yeares old and so strong enough to resist his old and weake father yet he yeeldeth himselfe Calvin 2. He was bound not that his resistance should be feared but least any involuntarie motion by the pangs of death might have beene procured Perer. 3. his willingnesse further appeareth in that Isaack maketh no request for his life nemo rogat nemo se excusat neither he entreateth nor his father excuseth this fact Poets doe fable how Iphigenia Agamemnons daughter was sacrificed to the gods for the safety of the whole armie but here we have a true stistory 4. It is most like that Abraham had before declared Gods commandement unto Isaack to the which hee was obedient Iosephus proceedeth further to shew what the communication was betweene them but whence knoweth he that it is out of doubt that Isaack was made acquainted with Gods counsell wherewith hee rested contented Luther QVEST. XII Why the Lord would not have Isaack offered up in sacrifice though he so commanded for the triall of Abrahams faith Vers. 11. THe Angell of the Lord called to him 1. I will omit here to make any long mention of the fables of the Hebrewes how that Sathan appeared in the shape of an old man to Abraham and againe to Sarah and in the likenesse of a young man to Isaack to draw them from obedience to Gods commandement but he prevailed not Muscul. 2. The heathen also by their poeticall fictions 〈◊〉 obscured the credit and truth of this history for as the Angell of God appeared in this last and extreme point to Abraham so they have also counterfeited the apparition of their gods in extreme perils Calvin 3. Thus it pleased God that although Abrahams faith was tried with this hard Commandement that it should not be performed 1. for his owne glory sake lest that Abrahams God might have beene traduced among the heathen as a lover of humane bloud 2. for Abrahams sakes that the Lord might more amply reward him for his faithfull obedience 3. for our sakes that we might have the example of faithfull Abraham to follow 4. and for the generall instruction of Christians that this might bee a lively figure unto them of the sacrifice of Christ both of Gods love in giving him to dye for the world and his obedience in humbling himselfe to the altar of the crosse And therefore Ambrose fitly applyeth those words of Abraham v. 8. God will provide him a lamb for a burnt offering to the sacrifice of Christ which was that alia hostia quam Deus pararet that other offering which God would provide lib. 1 de Abrah c. 8. QVEST. XIII How the Lord saith I know now that thou fearest c. Vers. 12. NOw I know c. 1. Not that God is ignorant of any thing or can have any experimentall knowledge of any thing which hee knew not before for all things are naked in his sight 2. Neither as Augustine expoundeth is God said to know quia fecit ut sibi Abraham innotesceret because he made Abraham to be knowne to himselfe qu. Genes 58. for then he should have rather said Now thou thy selfe knowest c. 3. Some doe take it for the knowledge of approbation I have knowne thee that is approved this fact of thine as it is said Psal. 1. The Lord knoweth the way of the righteous Hillary 4. Some referre it to Gods eternall knowledge I have knowne from the beginning that thou shouldest doe this thing but I appointed it to be done only now but this had beene no commendation to Abraham for thus God may be said to know every thing whether commendable or otherwise T. hom Angel 5. Wherefore the Lord speaketh here humanitus after the phrase of man and by a metaphor Iun. and in effect it is nothing else but that Abraham had now declared and testified his faith by his fruitfull obedience Calvin as Chrysostome saith Nunc omnibus declarasti quomodo Deâ—m syncere colas thou hast made manifest to all that thou sincerely worshippest God hom 47. in Gen. QVEST. XIV Why this fact of Abraham is rather ascribed to feare than love Vers. 12. THat thou fearest God It is so said rather than that thou lovest God 1. because the love of God must be joyned with a reverent feare of God serve the Lord with feare Psal. 4. and the love of God bringeth forth a filiall and dutifull feare as the child that loveth his father will also feare him 2. the feare of God is generally taken not for the particular act of feare but for the whole worship of God as Psal. 25.14 The secrets of the Lord is revealed to those that feare him and so feare in this sense comprehendeth also love 3. because Abraham had now forgotten his naturall love and affection toward his sonne because he feared God this act is more properly ascribed to his religious feare Per. QVEST. XV. This fact of Abraham wherein it excelleth the like among the heathen NOw concerning the excellency of Abrahams fact whereas the heathen objected the like examples among them to obscure this resolution of Abraham as how Codrus of Athens offered himselfe for his people and one Idomeneus King of Creet as he came from the battell of Troy being in a great tempest upon the sea did vow unto Neptune the first thing which came forth to meet him which was his sonne and so he did Marius is mentioned by Cyril against Iulian that sacrificed his sonne so the Scripture recordeth that inhumane facti of the King of Moab that did offer up his sonne in sacrifice 2 King 4. It shall now appeare what great difference there is between these examples and the fact of Abraham both in the difficulty of the object the readinesse of his affection the end also and purpose of the action 1. Abraham offred up his only sonne whom hee dearely loved being the sonne of his old age a vertuous and obedient sonne
will finde grace with him CHAP. XXIII 1. The Argument and Contents THis Chapter treateth 1. Of the death of Sarah and Abrahams mourning for her vers 1 2. 2. Of Abrahams care for her buriall both of the communication had with the Hittites and of the purchase of the ground at the hands of Ephron vers 12. to 18. Lastly of the funerall it selfe vers 19. 2. The divers readings v. 1. In Ciriah Arbe C.B.G.P. the City Arbee H.S.T. Arbee which is in the vally S. the others have not this clause v. 3. Rose from the office of the funerall ab officio funeris H. from the dead S. from the fight of the dead or corps caeter v. 4. To bury my dead H. to bury my dead from me S. out of my fight or face caeter v. 5. Not so my Lord. S. the rest have it not v. 9. Cave of Machpelah G.B.T.P. double cave caet but it seemeth rather to be the proper name of a place vers 17.19 v. 10. Ephron dwelled H.G. stood in the middest C. sate in the middest caeter jashab signifieth both to dwell and sit he sate at this time in the middest among them v. 13. Because you are with me heare me S. I pray you heare me H. If you will shew me mercy Ch. B.G. if you be that man Tr. 1. If you be the ruler and Lord of the ground If you will give it B.G. heb if then without any other words v. 15. I have heard S. heare me caet v. 16. Which is received for merchandise in every Province G. which is currant among merchants B.G.S.H. which passeth among merchants Tr. 1. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of the yeares of Sarahs life why noted Vers. 1. ANd Sarah lived an hundred twenty seven yeares c. 1. The Hebrewes note that the death of Sarah is immediately joyned to the birth of Rebecca according to that saying in Ecclesiastes The Sunne riseth and the Sunne setteth Mercer 2. She is the only woman whose whole age is recorded in Scripture 3. Because the words are she lived an hundred years twenty yeares and seven yeares some Hebrewes note by the dividing of the yeares that she was at an hundred yeares as faire as at twenty and as chaste as at seven But this is too curious seeing that the like phrase is used in setting downe Ismaels years Gen. 25.17 in whom the like constancie especially in goodnesse appeared not 4. Isaack was at this time thirty seven yeare old being borne in Sarahs ninety yeare therefore the Hebrewes observe that the letters of the first word vaiihu doe make thirty seven insinuating thereby that these were the best dayes of Sarahs life after the birth of Isaack in whom she joyed 5. But it is not like that Isaack was now thirty sâ—ven yeares old and Sarah died the same time when Isaack was offered up the Devill representing the manner thereof to Sarah as the Jewes fable whereupon shee tooke a conceit and died for whereas Abraham returned from Mount Moriah to Beersheba againe and there dwelled Gen. 22.19 but now he was removed to Hebron where Sarah died there must needs some good space of time come between Isaacks offering up and Sarahs death Perer. 6. Whereas the word is put in the plurall the lives of Sarah we need neither refer it to three lives in man the vegetative sensitive intellectuall life nor to the changes alterations wich seemeth to make one life many but the word is so used according to the phrase of the Hebrew language Calv. QUEST II. The City of Arba whence so called Vers. 2. SArah died in Kiriatharba Which City Arbah which signifieth foure was so called 1. Neither of the foure giants Ahiman Sheshan Talmai Anach Num. 13.23 for these were long after Abrahams time 2. Nor yet of the foure Patriarks Adam Abraham Isaack Iacob there buried for neither can it be proved that Adam was there buried and it was so called before the other were there buried 3. Neither was it so named of the forme and fashion of the City which should consist of foure parts 4. But the Citie bare this name of Arbah the father of Anak Iosu. 14.14 and 15.13 Mercer QUEST III. Of Hebron supposed to be the City of Iohn Baptist. THe same is Hebron 1. This City was not so named of Hebron which came of one of the sonnes of Caleb mentioned 1 Chron. 2.42 for it was so called long before his time 2. It is probable that this City Hebron was the place of Iohn Baptists Nativity for this City did belong to Iudah and was a City of the Priests 1 Chron. 6.55 it was also situate in the hilly Countrey Iosua 14.12 so was the City of Iohn Baptist both a City of Iudah belonging to the Priests where Zachary his father dwelt and had the situation in the hill Countrey Luk. 1.39 3. This Hebron is said to bee in Canaan as it is taken for the name of the whole Countrey for the Canaanites were also one of the seven Nations that inhabâ—ted that Countrey to whom Hebron belonged not but to the Hittites Perer. 4. Hebron signifieth a society or conjuâ—ction for there Abraham and Sarah â—saack Rebecca Iacob Lea lay buried together as honourable couples from hence then it seemeth the name was derived Muscul. QUEST IV. Whence Abraham came to mourne for Sarah Vers. 2. ABraham came to mourne c. 1. Neither is it like that Abraham at this time dwelled in Beersheba and Sarah in Hebron and that he came thence hither to bewaile Sâ—rah for Abraham as he bewailed Sarah being dead so he would not be wanting to her in her life 2. Neither did Abraham come from burying of his father Thare as some thinke whom Pererius would have to die two yeare before but the truth is that he was dead 62. yeares before for Abraham was now 137. yeares old who was borne in the 70. yeare of Tharehs age who lived 205. yeares in all so Abraham was 75. yeares old when his father died Gen. 12.5 to that adde 62. so shall we have Abrahams age of 137. 3. Neither doth this comming of Abraham signifie onely his addressing and preparing of himselfe to mourne Mercer 4. But Abraham commeth from his owne tent into Sarahs to mourne for her for they had their tents and habitations apart as it may appeare Gen. 24.67 Iun. QUEST V. Wherefore Abraham weepeth over the corps of Sarah Vers. 2. TO mourne for Sarah and to weepe for her 1. As Abraham by his weeping shewed his affection so by his mourning voice he set forth the vertues of Sarah and bewailed his losses Perer. 2. He weepeth over the corps not to provoke himselfe to weepe by the sight thereof being of late so much lightned with joy for Isaacks deliverance as some Hebrewes thinke but according to the use which then was and after continued among the Jewes which was to weepe a certaine time at the bodies or graves of the dead as
Assignes of THOMAS MAN PAVL MAN and IONAH MAN 1632. TO THE MOST HONOVRABLE LORD THE L. DVKE OF LENOX AND TO THE RIGHT Honourable the Earle of Marre Lords of his Majesties most Honourable Privie Counsell Grace mercie and Peace from the Lord JESUS RIght Honourable as the highest Majestie in his wise providence hath united and conjoyned your Honours not onely in one consent and judgement of religion but also in the joynt administration and regiment of this Nation and Kingdome under his excellent Majestie so I thought good to make your Honours with other of your Honourable place united Patrons of these my labours and as he saith non debet charta dividere quos amor mutuus copulavit It was not fit that I should sever you in this my duty who are combined in your mutuall amity Men of noble birth delight much in antiquities and it is their glory to derive their bloud by many descents from their thrice renowned ancestors here I present to your Honourable view that noble and most ancient family of Abraham Isaack and Iacob who were in favour with God and in honour and great reputation with men whose children they are which imitate their piety and obedience that famous Matron Paula whom Hierome so much commendeth was by her father descended of Aeneas and the noble house of the Gracchi by her mother of Agamemnon of whom Hierome made this Epitaph thought her Christian profession more honourable than her noble birth and condition and so I doubt not but that it is also your honourable resolution to say with the Apostle who having rehearsed his great privileges after the flesh his birth parentage and profession thus concludeth I count all these things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Iesus for whom I have counted all things as losse and doe judge them as dung that I might winne Christ as Hierome also saith well Summa apud Deum nobilitas clarum esse virtutibus I it is the greatest nobility with God to shine with vertue Here your Honours have the worthy example of the Patriarks to follow the Heathen presidents are but counterfeit and deceitfull they had the shadowes of vertues rather than the substance as Ambrose saith well of Polemo who of a drunken and riotous companion by hearing of Xenocrates became a Philosopher Siresipâ—ir a vino fuit semper tamen temulentus sacrilegio If hee were sober from wine yet hee was drunke with superstition But these holy examples are seasoned with grace and savour of true religion Abraham was famous in Pharaohs Court so was Isaack in Abimelecks and Iacob in another Pharaohs also for their piety and vertue So they which walke in their steps shall be great both with God and man Abraham told Abimelech plainly of the wrongs which his servants had done him Gen. 21.15 so is it the part of good Courtiers to shew unto the King the wrongs and oppressions that are done in the lanâ— to succour the poore to releeve the oppressed to countenance the truth to maintaine justice and equity Iacob being in Bethel saw a ladder which reached to heaven and the Angels ascending and descending upon it whereupon one thus noteth In the house of Bethel there is alwayes both going up and comming downe this I say not that the goers down should dismay you but the climers up incourage you So in the Princes Bethel and Court there be examples of both sorts of some that are declining and sliding backe onely seeking to make themselves great and to bee enriched by the Kings favour some there are though the smallest number which doe ascend upon this ladder not aspiring to their owne honour but using their favour to the glory of God and benefit of his Church Thus I trust your Lordships have learned to scale this ladder of honour to the which you are called to raise up those which are in the dust to set forward the truth to nourish and encourage the Preachers thereof to speake for the innocent to hold out your helpfull hand to the needy so shall your Honours ascend from step to step till you come to the top of the ladder where Christ sitteth who shall cast and tumble downe from thence all unfaithfull Stewards and cut them off to have their portion with hypocrites Matth. 24.51 but shall say unto you and all other that shall serve him faithfully herein in earth It is well done good servant and faithfull thou hast beene faithfull in little I will make thee ruler over much enter into thy masters joy Amen Your Honours ready to be commanded in the Lord ANDREW WILLET THE FIRST BOOKE OF THIS SECOND PART OF GENESIS Containing the Historie concerning the Patriarks ISAACK IACOB Hitherto hath beene continued the holy story of those three great Patriarks Adam before the floud Noah in the floud Abraham after the floud the rest of this Booke of Genesis followeth which setteth forth the life acts and death of the three other fathers Isaack Iacob Ioseph CHAP. XXV 1. The Contents of the Chapter IN this Chapter 1. Concerning Abraham his second mariage is declared with the issue thereof his children and their gifts vers 1. to 6. Then Abrahams yeares death and buriall vers 7. to 11. 2. Concerning Ismael his generations or off-spring are expressed his yeares of life his place of dwelling vers 12. to 20. 3. Of Isaack there is set downe his time of marriage the barrennesse of his wife the remedie by prayer vers 20.21 4. Concerning Esau and Iacob these things are rehearsed 1. Their manner of conception vers 22 23. 2. Of their birth 24. to 27. 3. Their divers education vers 27 28. 4. Esau his prophanenesse in selling his birth-right for a messe of pottage vers 29. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 1. Abraham had taken him another wife H.G. proceeding or adding tooke another wife caeter v. 2. Zambran Ioctan Madal Sebe S. Zimran Iocksan Madan Shuah caeter v. 3. The sonnes of Dedan were in holds tents and Islands â— the sons of Dedan Asshurim Letushim Leumim v. 4. Gephar Apher Raga S. Epha Epher Eldaha caeter v. 6. Sonnes of the Concubine C. of the Concubines caet v. 8. And fainting or wearing away H.S.C.B. he yeelded up the spirit or died T.G.P. jagaug signifieth to faint gavagh expirare to yeeld the spirit which word is here used v. 11. Isaack dwelt by the Well of the living and seeing H.B. the Well of vision S. Where the Angell of life appeared C. Beâ—r-lahairâ— G.P. the fountaine Lahoiro T. v. 12. Which Hagar the Egyptian Sarahs maid bare H. bare to Abraham caet v. 13. These the names of his sonnes H. of the sonnes of Ismael cat v. 13. Nadbehel Massa. S. Adbehel Mibsa cat v. 18. from Havilah to Agara C. from Havila to Sur. cat v. 18. he died in the presence of all his brethren H.B.P. he dwelt S.C. his lot fell T. G. naphal signifieth 〈◊〉 fall it
and died c. 1. Though the word gavâ— rather so signifieth expirare to give up the ghost than deficere to faint Hieromes reason is not so good quia non coâ—venit Abraha deficere it was not fitting that Abraham should faint and decrease for no morall decreasing or fainting is here spoken of but onely naturall 2. Neither is this word which signifieth to yeeld up the Spirit used onely of the just as Rabbi Salomon and Lyranâ—â— for the same is uttered of the old world Gen. 7.21 all the flesh yeelded the breath and of Ismael vers 17. of this chapter 3. Neither is Oleasters reason sufficient why we should read rather he fainted than yeelded up the spirit because it followeth he died and so the same thing would be twice expressed for this expiring or yeelding up of the spirit sheweth the facility and easinesse of his death as the word following betokeneth the thing that he dyed so this declareth the manner not that he dyed without any sicknesse or griefe as Aben Ezra for the faithfull are not exempted from the common condition of mankind Vatah. but it sheweth that he willingly rendred up his soule into the hands of God Calvin 4. Cajetanes collection is not here to be refused that three things are set downe by Moses concerning Abrahams departure 1. that he dyed that is was dissolved which belongeth unto the whole man as consisting of body and soule 2. that hee was buried which concerneth his body 3. that he was gathered unto his people in respect of his soule which was joyned to the blessed company of the Saints Cajet in hunc lâ—â—um QUEST XIII How Abraham died in a good age and full of yeares IN a good age satisfied or full of daies 1. In that Abraham is said to have died in a good old age whereas many before him were of longer life and much elder of whom this phrase is not used Philo gathereth that it was not the old age of his body but his perfection of vertue that made a good old age Disce soli viro bonâ— contingere senectutem bonam Know that onely a good old age happened to a good man sic etiam Calvin 2. Hee was full because daies is not added in the originall the Hebrewes gather that he was full not onely of daies but of all other blessings ex Mercer and he was satisfied with daies as not desirous to have his life prolonged Calvin Thus even some among the Heathen were satâ—â—e with daies as Cicero writeth of Cato that he should say Siquis deus mihi largiatur â—t ex hac atate repusrascam in cunis vagiam valde recâ—sem that if God should grant me to become a childe againe and to cry in the cradle I would refuse it Cicer. de senectus Therefore Abraham was in another sort full of daies because his daies were full of vertue hee had not spent his life in vaine but as Apelles the cunning painter was wont to say nullus dies sine linea no day without a line and Titus the Emperour if any day had passed wherein he had not done some good would say to his friends Diemperdidi I have lost a day so no doubt Abraham did passe over his time in fruitfull workes Perer. QUEST XIV How the sinner is said to die before his time ABraham then received a great blessing of God in living both long and well and dying in his time not as the Preacher saith of the wicked man lest thou die in tempore non tuo in a time not thine Ecclesiast 7.19 which is so spoken 1. Not that a man can die before the time appointed of God for a mans daies are determined with God Iob 14.5 2. Nor yet so onely because the wicked is never prepared or fit for death both because he is destitute of vertue as also hee expecteth not death in which respects in some sense he may be said to die not in his time being neither ripe for it in vertue nor looking for it 4. But the sinner is said to die before his time when the naturall course of his life which he in the judgement of man though not in the determination of God might have lived is by some violent and extraordinary kinde of death shortned and cut off as Nadab and Abihu for offering in strange fire were thus before their time consumed with a fire sent from God Levit. 10. ex Perer. QUEST XV. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 8. ANd was gathered to his people 1. This people are not the sunne moone and starres or the invisible idaea or formes according to the which these sensible things were made or the foure elements of the which the bodies of men are compounded as Philo imagineth these are but Platonicall conceits and who seeth not how unproperly the name of people agreeth to any of these 2. Neither with Augustine by people doe we understand the society and company of Angels for Ismael also is said vers 17. to be gathered to his people 3. Neither can it bee applied to Limbus patrum where all the just men were from the beginning of the world as Lyranus Rupertus unlesse they will say that Ismael also went into the place of just men who was also gathered to his people and whereas they make Limbuâ— patrum a member of hell a place of darknesse Abraham went not thither seeing Abrahams besome was a place of rest and joy where the Angels were for they carried Lazarus soule thither But these blessed spirits are Angels of light and not of darknesse 4. We also refuse Burgensis conceit who noteth a difference of phrase in the old and new testament when the Scripture speaketh of the dead they are said that die in the new testament to die in the Lord which phrase is not used of any in the old testament because they were not admitted ad beatificam Dei visioneâ—â— to the blessed presence and sight of God Contr. Indeed I grant that after the manifestation of the Messiah to the world the Scripture speaketh more clearely of the faithfull departed in the new testament because the Messiah was then come but not for any such cause pretended for even the soules of the faithfull departed in the old testament did enjoy the presence of God as David saith I shall behold thy face in righteousnesse and when I awake be satisfied with thine image Psal. 17.15 he doubted not but that his soule first apart should see God and then both body and soule in the resurrection and the Scripture speaketh evidently that Abraham Isaack and Iacob did live with God for of them God is called who is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 5. Neither this phrase to be gathered to his people doth only signifie to be in the state of the dead and equivalent to that phrase to sleepe with their fathers which is spoken of the wicked as well as of the righteous as idolatrous Ahaz is
gave him a name Edom Calvin this action was governed by Gods providence and the prophecie began now to take place the elder shall serve the younger QUEST XL. Whether Iacob offended in causing Esau to sell his birthright Vers. 31. SEll me now thy birthright 1. Iacob may be thought to have dealt cruelly with Esau and uncharitably that would give him no releefe being ready to die but upon such hard conditions but the answer is that Esau coveted Iacobs pottage not of necessity for there was other meat in the house whereby he might have satisfied his hunger but of an unsatiable greedinesse 2. But Iacob was too covetous to cause Esau to sell for so small a trifle so rich a thing as his birthright which included many priviledges as the priority and government of his brethren a double portion to the rest the priesthood and right to sacrifice Exod. 19.22 and 24.5 and beside was a type and figure of everlasting life Vatabl. here the answer is not as the Hebrewes thinke that Iacob gave a greater summe and this to be onely as an earnest for no such thing appeareth in the Scripture but the true answer is this that Iacob knew by the instruction of his mother that the birthright by Gods appointment belonged unto him and therefore as a wise man he taketh this occasion to recover his right from him that was an usurper of it 3. But seeing this birthright was a sacred thing for otherwise Esau should not be counted a profane person for selling it how could Iacob buy it without sinne Answer Iacob intelligitur suam vexationem redemisse Iacob did but redeeme his owne vexation he buyeth not a thing which was not belonging to him but onely recovereth that which was his owne and this is not simoniacal in sacred things for a man to redeeme his quietnesse and peaceable possession 4. But seeing Esau sinned in selling his birthright how could Iacob be without sinne yes Iacob offended not being hereunto no doubt stirred and incited by the spirit of God and sparing from his owne belly to obtaine such a blessing preferring things spirituall before temporall but Esau sinned in setting so light by the blessing of God as shall appeare in the next question Mer. yet this extraordinary fact of Iacob is not to be drawne into imitation QUEST XLI Whether before the law the first borne did alwaies exercise priesthood BUt whether the priesthood did goe with the birthright and that the first borne did execute the priests office it is questioned among the learned for the solution whereof 1. I neither thinke with the Hebrewes that the first borne of the family alwayes had the preheminence of the priesthood for Abel the younger brother offered sacrifice as well as Cain 2. Neither with Oleaster that this was never practised whose opinion is that the priesthood was not due to the first borne before the law of Moses in hunc loc for the contrary is evident Exod. 24.5 3. Neither do I wholly assent to Hierome who thinketh that omnes primogeniti ex stirpe Noe that all the first borne of Noahs stocke were priests epist. 126. ad Evag. for then Iapheth rather then Sem should have had that prerogative for hee was elder than Sem being borne in the 500. yeare of Noahs age Gen. 5.32 Sem two yeare after Gen. 11.10 yet Sem was the Priest of the most high God supposed to be Melchisedeck and Noah saith Blessed be the Lord God of Sem Gen. 9.26 4. Neither doth the Apostle call Esau prophane only as Pererius thinketh because he sold the Priesthood annexed to the birth-right for it was a holy thing in respect of the spirituall blessing annexed unto it In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed Gen. 22.18 5. This then is our opinion rather that before Moses the father of the house was the Priest for the family as wee read that Iob every day offered sacrifice for his sonnes but after the father was deceased then the first borne succeeded both in the inheritance and priesthood and so after Isaacks decease the birth-right should also have conveyed with it the Priesthood Mercer But that ordinance that the first borne should exercise the Priesthood and offer sacrifice though he were not the father of the family is no older than Moses Exod. 19.22.24.5 Who then were sanctified and set apart unto God Exod. 13.2 QUEST XXXVII How many wayes Esau offended in selling his birth-right Vers. 32. LOe I am almost dead c. Esau diversly offended in selling his birth-right 1. Because he esteemeth his birth-right only by the present commodity and pleasure of this life for whether he meane in respect of his daily danger in hunting he was subject to death as Iun. Or generally speake of his mortality as Mercer Or which is most like of his present faintnesse Calvin Hee onely limiteth his birth-right to this life as though it could not profit him afterward whereupon the Hebrewes gather that hee denied the resurrection 2. Esau offended in his intemperancy and ravenous desire that preferred his belly before so great and rich a birth-right 3. In that for so meane a value hee would forgoe such an inheritance for whereas Aben Ezra would excuse the matter because Isaack was now become very poore and therefore Esau set the lesse by his patrimony it hath no ground at all for whereas Abraham was very rich and left all to Isaack and God blessed Isaack beside how is it like that Isaack in so short a time could bee wasted 4. Another sinne was Esau his profanenesse noted by the Apostle Heb. 12.16 that parted with a spiritual blessing for a temporal and momentany pleasure 5. His unthankfulnesse to God appeareth in that he no more regarded the dignity of the first borne given unto him 6. His obstinacy in that he repented not his folly but after he had done went away carelesse and therefore it is said Esau contemned his birth-right vers 34. 7. His falshood and persidious nature appeareth who though hee had passed over his birth-right to Iacob with an oath yet seemed to make but a scoffe of it and purposed not in his heart to performe it Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the immortality of the soule Vers. 8. WAs gathered to his people Theodoret from hence well concludeth the immortality of the soule and the hope of the resurrection for if men wholly perish and did not passe to another life Moses would not have said He was gathered to his people qu. 109. in Genes our Saviour also useth the like argument to prove that Abraham was alive to God because the Lord calleth himselfe the God of Isaack Abraham and Iacob God is not the God of the dead but the living Matth. 22.23 2 Doct. Order of time not alwayes observed in the sacred histories Vers. 20. ISaack was 40. yeare old c. Whereas Moses setteth downe the death of Abraham and of Ismael before he describeth the
his friends as Onkelos Lyranus Tostat. 3. Abimelech commeth a farre journey not of love or good will but partly pricked in conscience for the wrongs which he had offered to Isaack Chrysost. hom 52. in Gen. partly providing for their posterity that Isaack would doe them no hurt Mercer 4. Origen by these three that came to Isaack understandeth the tripartite wisdome of the Gentiles the morall naturall rationall which dissenting at the first from the Christian faith were afterward reconciled to it hom 14. in Genes QUEST XIII Why Isaack made a feast to Abimelech and his company Vers. 3. HE made them a feast 1. Isaack did this of a simple and sincere affection that they might know there remained no grudge or purpose of revenge in his minde for to invite unto feasts is a signe of remitting and forgetting of former wrongs as Augustus Caesar did bid Catullus the railing Poet to supper in token he had forgiven him though Alexander dissemblingly brought Philotas to his table to have the better opportunity to murther him as Absolom served his brother Ammon 2. Some thinke that the next morning the oath before betweene them made was againe ratified Mer. But it is more like that the oath was deferred till the next morning as being the fittest time for serious consultations it was the Persians barbarous manner in the middest of their cups to advise of their weightiest affaires Perer. QUEST XIV Wherefore the well is called Shibah Vers. 33. SO he called it Shiba 1. Some interpret this word abundance or saturity because of the plenty of water that was found as Hierome who findeth fault with the Septuagint because they translate it oath But sabang signifieth to abound not shabang which is here used 2. It is more like that this was both the same well which Abraham digged and the same name derived from the oath which was made betweene Isaack and Abimelech as before betweene Abraham and Abimelech for so this story saith that Isaack gave them the same names which his father gave them vers 18. Mercer Calvin QUEST XV. Of the marriage of Esau. Vers. 34. WHen Esau was forty yeare old c. 1. The Hebrewes thinke that Esau till hee was forty yeare old gave himselfe to a vitious and a licentious life which may well be and that to imitate his father who was married at forty he doth the like 2. This his marrying into the flocke of Canaan was abdicationis praeludium a fore-runner of his casting off and missing of the blessing as it followeth in the next Chapter Calvin 3. Tostatus thinketh that in the forty yeare of Esau which was the hundred of Isaack Sem died but Pererius thinking to correct his oversight falleth into a greater errour referring the death of Sem to the 50. of Esau and 100. of Isaack whereas they are both in a great errour for Sem died in the 50. yeare of Isaacks life 60. yeare before this time which was 502. yeares after the floud QUEST XVI The evill qualities of Esau his wives Vers. 35. THey were a griefe of minde 1. Some read rebellious of marah to rebell sic Chald. But it rather commeth of marra to be bitter 2. And so were the wives of Esau bitter unto Isaack and Rebeckah and a great offence of mind unto them both in respect of their corrupt manners and their divers profession being given to idolatry as the Canaanites were Tharg Hierosol 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God maketh rich Vers. 12. THe Lord blessed him Gods blessing is given as a reason of Isaacks increasing and growing rich whereupon Augustine noteth Etiam ipsa bona temporalia nec dari posse nec sperari debere c. nisi ab uno Deo That these temporall goods cannot be given or hoped for but from the only God quast 76. in Genes as the wise man saith Prov. 10.22 The blessing of the Lord maketh rich 2. Doct. The soules of the righteous live with God Vers. 24. I Am the God of Abraham Abraham was now dead and yet the Lord professeth himselfe to be his God whereby we are taught that the soules of the righteous after this life doe live with God for as our Saviour saith He is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 Muscul. 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against the breaking of covenants Vers. 15. THe Philistims filled all the wels c. Though that Abimelech had made a covenant with Abraham concerning the well Gen. 21.30 yet after Abrahams death they goe from the covenant such are the enemies of the Church of whom the Prophet speaketh Isa. 33.8 He hath broken the covenant c. he regardeth no man such are the Romanists which hold that faith is not to be kept with heretikes as they brake the safe conduct granted to Iohn Hus and Hierome of Prage Mercer 2. Confut. Of restoring the ancient doctrine with the ancient names Vers. 18. HE gave them the same names which his father gave them The Philistims both stopped the ancient wels and abolished the names Isaack restoreth both so the Church of Rome hath abolished both the true ancient doctrine of the Sacraments as also taken away the name thereof calling it by an idolatrous name of their owne invention of the Masse Muscul. We therefore with Isaack have restored the pure doctrine of the ancient primitive Church together with the names as the Communion the Lords supper the Lords day c. As the Prophet saith Aske for the old way which is the good way and walke therein Ierem. 6.16 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Not to imitate our fathers infirmities Vers. 7. HE said she is my sister Abraham before had offended in the same kinde and yet Isaack cannot take heed so apt children are to imitate the infirmities of their parents Mercer But we should rather learne to decline from our parents errings as the Prophet saith If he beget a sonne that seeth all his fathers sinnes c. and feareth neither doth the like c. Ezek. 18.14 2. Observ. The punishment of adultery Vers. 11. HE that toucheth this man or his wife shall dye the death Thus by the light of nature they were taught that adultery was a grievous sinne and Abimelech pronounceth the sentence of death against such as should violate another mans wife as the Lord had said before to Abimelech Thou art but dead because of the woman which thou hast taken Genes 20. vers 3. 3. Observ. Adversity and prosperity tempered together Vers. 12. ISaack sowed c. Thus the Lord tempereth adversity and prosperity sorrow and joy together like as the night and day summer and winter doe one succeed another Isaack after these grievous tentations concerning his wife is increased and blessed of God likewise vers 20. when his servants had strived for two wels they peaceably enjoy the third calling it Rehoboth roomth as the Psalme saith Weeping may abide in the evening but joy commeth in the morning Psal.
was not 〈◊〉 off from the place where Iacob kept his sheep◠whence hee sent for his 〈◊〉 into the 〈◊〉 vers 4. and therefore it could be little lesse than 3. dayes journey from Laban who is 〈◊〉 like for 〈◊〉 haste and expedition to take his journey from the place whither the 〈◊〉 was brought him 3. Though Iacob was six dayes journey before Laban he might well overtake him in seven dayes 〈…〉 was encumbred with his children and cattell and could not drive fast and for that hee had pitched his tents in Gilead there purposing to refresh himselfe supposing the danger and feare of Labans pursuit to be over Mercer QUEST XII How Laban is charged neither to speake good or evill Vers. 24. TAke heed thou speake not ought save good c. The Hebrew phrase is from good to evill 1. Which is not to begin with good words and end with evill as Onkelos seemeth to take it 2. Nor yet is he forbidden only not to speak evil as the Latine and Septuagint with others 3. But he is forbidden to speak any thing at all either good or bad either faire words or soule not simply but concerning Iacobs returne againe into Mesopotamia and so Laban accordingly forbeareth to speake any thing at all of that matter the like phrase is used Gen. 24.50 Mercer Iun. QUEST XIII When God appeared to Laban and where he pitched his tents Vers. 25. THen Laban overtooke Iacob 1. This vision which Laban had was not in the beginning of his journey as some thinke but in the same night that he came to Gilead for so he saith Yesternight or the last night for so the word cemesh signifieth the God of your Father appeared unto me when he was now purposed to bee revenged of Iacob the Lord staied him 2. They pitched their tents both in the same mount not farre asunder some say Iacob was in the top of the hill Laban in the bottome some affirme the contrary but this is uncertaine Mercer It is most like that Iacob seeing Laban to approach set himselfe in as good order as he could doubting the worst Muscul. QUEST XIV How Iacob saith let him not live Vers. 32. WIth whom thou findest thy gods let him not live c. 1. Not as though he should say I will kill him with mine owne hand 2. Neither by vertue of this curse as the Hebrewes note did Rachel afterward dye an untimely death for Iacob knew not that she had them 3. But either they are words of imprecation whereby Iacob wisheth that God would shew his judgements upon him that had committed that theft Mercer Or else he giveth power to Laban even to take away their life Calvin QUEST XV. Of the divers takings of the word brother in Scripture SEarch before our brethren 1. Hierome noteth that the word brother is foure wayes taken in Scripture 1. For them that are so by nature and properly as Iacob and Esau were brethren 2. For them of the same nation as the Israelites were all brethren Act. 7.26 3. They that were of one kindred were called brethren as Abraham saith to Lot Wee are brethren Genes 13.8 4. They that are of the same Christian faith and profession 1 Cor. 5.11 If any that is called a brother c. 2. By brethren here wee understand not with Hierome Iacobs children which were yet of small discretion Ruben the eldest not being above 13. yeare old nor yet some other of his wives kindred that Iacob brought away with him out of Mesopotamia for they had beene no competent Judges in this case but the brethren were those whom Laban brought with him of his kindred vers 23. to whom Iacob referreth the judgement of this matter Mercer QUEST XVI Of the order in Labans searching of the tents Vers. 33. THen came Laban into Iacobs tent 1. Neither as Rasi thinketh had Iacob and Rachel one tent for the text sheweth that Laban went first into Iacobs tent and then into Leahs and from thence to Rachels 2. Though last mention bee made of Rachels tent that is because there the idols were hid Laban last of all searched the maids tents and out of Leahs tent he went into Rachels Mercer QUEST XVII Of Rachels excuse Vers. 35. THe custome of women is upon me 1. Not that women while their monethly custome is upon them are not able to rise but many times they are beside that infirmity troubled with the head-ake and are stomacke-sicke and not fit to be disquieted 2. As also they counted women in that case in times past uncleane they would neither talke with them nor suffer them to breathe upon them which might be the cause that Laban answereth not a word to his daughter but goeth presently out of her tent hereof the word niddah that signifieth an uncleane woman is derived of nadah which is to remove or send farre off because women at that season were separated from the company of others Mercer 3. Rachel made this excuse not either in detestation of the Idols vouchsafing them no better place than the Camels litter nor yet so much of love to keepe them as of feare because of the present danger in the meane time Laban by this excuse was blinded and deluded QUEST XVIII Whom Iacob meaneth by the feare of Isaack Vers. 42. THe feare of Isaack 1. Iacob neither meaneth that feare of Isaack when his father would have offered him up in sacrifice as some interpret for that was but a naturall feare of death for his patience and obedience was more commendable at that time than his feare 2. Neither doth Iacob speake of his owne feare and reverence toward his father 3. Nor yet of Isaacks feare or worship of God 4. Or of Isaacks feare and care for the prosperity of his sonne Iacob all these are here unproper to be matched with the God of Abraham 5. But feare is taken here not actively but passively for God himselfe that is feared Calvin who sometime is called by names effectivè in respect of the effect so is God called our strength our health salvation or objective by way of object so is God called our hope our love our joy our feare because he is the object of all these Perer. Rasi thinketh that hee is called not the God but feare of Isaack because Isaack was yet living and God doth not call himselfe by the living but this is a false note for Gen. 28.13 he is called the God of Isaack some doe in this difference of names note a distinction of the persons and understand the God of Abraham to bee the father the feare of Isaack to be Christ of whom he was a speciall type This collection may bee admitted Mercer So then by the feare of Isaack Iacob meaneth the God whom Isaack feared and worshipped having a reference to that feare also whereby Isaack was restrained from revoking the blessing given to Iacob Gen. 27.33 QUEST XIX Of the Syrian name which Laban gave and of the use
whatsoever he hath decreed concerning any mans salvation shall stand Calvin For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance Rom. 11.29 Yet must not this doctrine make us secure to sinne presumptuously trusting to Gods election but as the Apostle saith We must worke out our salvation with feare and trembling lest we be circumvented of Sathan and prevented of that which we vainly hoped for Confut. Against the errour of the Novatians THis example of Ruben notwirhstanding his fall restored to his patriarchal dignity doth further confute that error of the Novatians who denied pardon to those which were fallen and refused to receive them into their society and congregation Calvin We see that our Saviour Christ when Perer had thrice denied him yet vouchsafed to receive him to mercy and to confirme him in his Apostleship 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Amendment of life delivereth from dangers Vers. 2. THou said Iacob put away the strange Gods c Iacob being in great danger doth purge and cleanse hâ—s houshold so the next way to finde deliverance and to obtaine ptotection from God is to amend our life and to renew our hearts and to turne every man from his evill wayes Perer. Heereupon Balaam gave that wicked counsell to put a stumbling blocke before the Israelites to cause them to sinne that they might run into Gods displeasure and be out of his protection 2. Observ. The people must shew themselves willing to be reformed Vers. 4. THey gave unto Iacob all the strange gods Herein appeareth the singular and prompt obedience of Iacobs houshold who are contented to put away their idols iewels and caterings wherein they had so much before delighted Mercer which â—eacheth that the people should shew themselves ready and willing to be reclaimed from their superstitions and corruptions of life as we read that the souldiers and people came unto Iohn and asked him Master what shall we doe Luk. 3. 3. Observ. God striketh feare into mens hearts Vers. 5. THe feare of God was upon the cities Thus God is able to command the affections of men and to smite them with feare where otherwise there is no apparent cause of feare as here the strong and populous cities of Canaan are afraid of Iacob So Rahab confessed to the spies the feare of you is fallen upon us Iosu. 2.9 Thus God is able to deliver his Church whereas no other meanes are at hand by terrifying the hearts of the enemies thereof 4. Observ. It is lawfull and commendable to mourne moderately for the dead Vers. 8. IAcob and his company made such lamentation for the departure of that godly matron Deborah that he called the place the â—ake of lamentation It is not then unlawfull to mourne for the dead nay it is an uncomly thing to shew drie cheekes in the funeralls of parents wives and children as some doe S. Paul forbiddeth not to mourne for the dead but not as they that have no hope 1. Thessal 4. Muscul. 5. Observ. Our â—oyes in this life are miâ—ed with sorrow Vers. 19. THus died Rachel Iacob doth not so much rejoyce for the birth of Benjamin as he hath occasion of griefe offered for the losse and death of deare Rachel thus the Lord seeth it to be good to temper our joy with sorrow and therein we see the mutable and changeable condition of this life which affordeth no perpetuall and constant joy Perer. And therefore amidst our joyes it is good to arme our selves against sorrow as Iob in the midst of his prosperous estate did looke for adversity saying The thing which I feared is now come upon me Iob 3.25 6. Observ. One affliction followeth after another WE see further that Iacobs life was a continuall warfare still one temptation followed in the necke of another 1. Dinah was ravished 2. Simeon and Levi put the city to the sword 3. Deborah dieth 4. Then Rachel his beloved wife 5. Then Ruben commiteth incest 6. Ioseph is sold into Egypt 7. Isaack dieth 8. Benjamin is also taken from him to goe into Egypt Thus many are the tentations and tribulations wherewith the Lord trieth his children Calvin We learne that while we live here we should prepare our selves for crosses and afflictions and when we are escaped one to looke presently for another This was Iobs case when one messenger followed at the heeles of another bringing him evill tidings Iob 1. 7. Observ. Godly women may die in childbirth Vers. 18. AS shee was about to yeeld up the ghost c. The Hebrewes note three women in Scripture that died in travaile Rachel the wife of Phinehes the sonne of Eli and Michol Davidâ— wife because it is said she had no children till the day of her death but this is a simple conjecture the meaning is that she had no children at all Mercer But we see by this example that even godly women may have Rachels lot to die in travaile and therefore such are not to hee discomforted if it please God that they so end their daies 8. Observ. Great blemishes sometime fall out in the Church of God Vers. 21. RVben lay with his fathers concubine c. It need not then seeme strange if such blemishes fall out sometime in the Church of God and families of Saints as Ruben here committeth incest in Iacobs house and it seemeth Bilha the mother of two tribes in Israel was consenting thereunto so among the Corinthians a young man had his fathers wife 1 Cor. 5.1 Mercer CHAP. XXXVI 1. The Method and Contents IN this chapter the externall state and happinesse of Esau is set forth first by his polygamie and marriage of many wives with the fruits thereof his children and the adjunctes thereunto his riches vers 1. to vers 8. Secondly by his genealogie where his children and nephewes are rehearsed and described 1. By their nativitie of what wives he had them vers 8. to 15. 2. By their dignity vers 15. to 20. Thirdly by the estate of his country where first the old inhabitants the Hâ—rites are described vers 20. to 32. then the new inhabitants the Edomites first governed by Kings vers 31. to 40. then by Dukes againe vers 40. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 2. Eliba Sebagon S. Aâ—libama Sibeon cat v. 5. Ieul Ieglom S. Iehus Iaalon cat v. 6. all the bodies of his house S. the soules of his house caet he went out of the land of Canaan S. into another country H. C. G. P. into a country away B. into the region of Seir T. from his brother Iacob H. from the face of his brother S. B.G.P. because of his brother C. before the comming of his brother T. from the face of his brother heb v. 8. Iacob dwelt in the land where his father dwelt in Canaan S. v. 11. Kâ—nez and Châ—ra H. Kenes cater v. 13. Zaresome S. Zerach Sammah cat v. 14. The sonnes of Libemas the daughter of Enam S. of Aâ—libamah the daughter of Ana caeter
Pererius allegeth that place Psal. 16.10 Thou wilt not leave my soule in hell to shew that sheol is taken for hell it shall not be amisse by the way to examine the sense of this place whereof there are three expositions First some by soule nephesh understand the dead body as it is taken Levit. 21.1 Let none be defiled among the dead the word is nephesh soule Genebrard a popish writer thus confuteth this opinion denying that nephesh is in this place taken for the body but by a metonymie it signifieth the exequies and funerall duties performed to the soule of the dead Contra. Though we also approve not the former exposition of nephesh in this place and that reverend man that so translated Act. 2. hath himselfe in that point altered his translation in his last edition of his annotations upon the new testament yet Genebrard had no reason to deny the word to bee so taken Levit. 21.1 for 1. beside that the Israelites had no such custome to use any suffrages or exequies for the soules of the dead and therefore nephesh can signifie no such thing 2. The defiling was by touching the dead Levit. 22.4 or by going to the dead Levit. 21.11 but the soules of the dead cannot be touched neither could the suffrages for the soules but the presence of the bodies pollute them 3. The Levites are forbidden to defile themselves with the dead saving their fathers and mothers and other of their neare kindred Levit. 22.2 But it is not like that they should have beene forbidden to pray or offer suffrages for any but their owne kindred yea the high Priest is forbidden to defile himselfe for his father and mother vers 10. Let them say also that he was forbidden to pray for the soule of his father and mother if any such thing had beene in use then therefore Genebrards exposition is vaine and without any good ground Secondly Pererius and other of that sort doe take hell here for that locall place and region of soules where they imagine the fathers to have remained before the comming of Christ and Pererius best reason is because the Prophet maketh a manifest distinction betweene the soule and body of Christ and hell and the grave saying Thou shalt not leave my soule in hell nor suffer thy holy one to see corruption Perer. in cap. 13. numer 100. Contra. 1. Here is no distinction of divers parts but an explanation of the same thing in divers words according to the use of Scripture so that what is first said somewhat darkly Thou wilt not leave my soule in grave is afterward more plainly declared that is Thou wilt not suffer thy holy one to see corruption 2. That such locall place of hell cannot be here understood may appeare by these reasons out of the text it selfe 1. That place where Christs soule was not left and it was impossible he should be holden of it God loosed the sorrowes of Act. 2.24 but God loosed not for Christ the sorrowes of hell which he felt not after his passion Ergo Christs soule was not left in hell 2. The not leaving of Christs soule in hell was the cause why his flesh did rest in hope vers 26 27. the not leaving of his soule in the locall place of hell caused not his flesh to rest in hope but the not leaving of it in the grave and the not seeing of corruption for their soules which are left in hell shall also returne to their bodies and bee raised together with them Ergo. 3. That hell where Christs soule is not left is the place where corruption is to be seene for so one clause of the sentence is expounded by the other but in hell there is no corruption Ergo. 4. David when he said Thou shalt not leave my soule in hell spake of Christs resurrection Act. 2.31 but the not leaving of Christs soule in the infernall hell concerneth not the resurrection of Christs body Ergo David meaneth not that hell The third exposition therefore is which I preferre before the rest that Christs soule that is his life or person should not be left in the grave and so this place of the Psalme may bee expounded by the like Psal. 89.48 What man liveth and shall not see death shall hee deliver his soule from the hand of hell or the grave here the Psalmist himselfe expoundeth hell to be death where the soule that is the life lieth as it were hid and buried as Psal. 88.3 My life draweth neare to the grave sic Paul Fag annotat in Chaldaic paraphras in Pentateuch 8. Confut. Iacob goeth mourning to the grave not to hell BUt whereas Pererius yet further in this place concerning Iacobs descending c would have hell and not the grave understood for all goe not downe to the grave and Iacob did thinke that Ioseph was not in the grave being supposed to be torne of wilde beasts the contrary shall now appeare 1. This is a friuolous objection for the grave is not onely a pit or a hole made for the dead but any place where the body falleth to dust and corruption as Iob describeth it chap. 17. vers 13. The grave shall be my house vers 14. I shall say to corruption thou art my father vers 16. They shall lie together in the dust thereof even Ioseph also though he had beene torne of wilde beasts and rotted upon the earth should have had his grave 2. In saying all goe not to the grave he manifestly contradicteth the Scripture as is before alleaged What man shall deliver his soule from the hand of the grave Psal. 89.48 3. Hell in the old Testament is not taken otherwise than for a place of torment and punishment but neither Iacob not Ioseph went to any such place 4. This hell Iacob went unto with his gray head or haires Gen. 42.38 but the grave not hell is the place for gray haires 5. Lastly that sheol here signifieth the grave it is the opinion of Ab. Ezra whom Eugubinus Cajetanus Oleaster Vatablus follow and among the Protestants Fagius Mercer with others 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. That parents be not partiall in their loves toward their children Vers. 4. IOsephs brethren hated him because they saw that their father loved him Ambrose noteth this to have beene an over-sight in Iacob for preferring one of the brethren before the rest who if he in Ioseph loved and preferred his vertue should rather have concealed his affection for as hee well saith it is no marvell if brethren fall out for houses and land when Iosephs brethren hated him for a coat Ambr. lib. 2. de Ioseph Wherefore parents may learne how inconvenient a thing it is to bee partiall toward their children and by immoderate love toward some to exasperate and provoke the rest which the Apostle giveth warning of Fathers provoke not your children to wrath Eph. 6.4 2. Observ. A pitifull man will first offer himselfe to them that are in misery Vers.
Ambrose The third is their impudent behaviour and continuall solliciting as here this unshamefast woman did day by day move and provoke Ioseph Vers. 10 ex Perer. 4. Observ. The occasion of evill to bee avoyded Vers. 10. HE hearkened not unto her to lie with her or bee in her companie Ioseph would avoid all occasions that might draw him into the least suspition of evill Muscul. So the Apostle saith Abstaine from all appearance of evill 1 Thess. 1.22 He that will not be inticed to adulterie drunkennesse and such like must shunne and avoid the companie of such 5. Observ. The unstable affections of the wicked Vers 14. SHee called to the men of the house This wicked womans love was turned into hatred such was Amnons filthie love or lust rather toward Thamar whom he hated as much after his uncleane act as hee doated upon her before 2 Sam. 13.15 Such are the affections of the wicked variable inconstant inhumane unstedfast 6. Observ. God visiteth his children even in prison Vers. 21. THe Lord was with Ioseph and shewed him mercie c. Though Ioseph was closed up in the darke dungeon yet God was his light and comfort as it is in the Psalme Vnto the righteous ariseth light in darkenesse Psal. 102.4 Visiâ—at deus in carcere suos God doth visit his even in prison as Christ saith in the person of his members I was in prison and ye did not visit mee Matth. 25. Thus God visited Paul and Silas being fast in the stocks in the inner prison when at midnight they sung a Psalme unto God Act. 16.25 CHAP. XL. 1. The Method or Argument THis chapter sheweth first what favour Ioseph found for the time present at the hands of the keeper and how he was set over the other prisoners vers 1. to vers 5. Secondly how by the interpretation of certaine dreames he made away for his deliverance and preferment following where first the dreames are rehearsed unto him the dreame of Pharaohs chiefe Butler apart as also the dreame of the chiefe Baker then Ioseph expoundeth the dreames the interpretation of the one was good of the other unhappie lastly is shewed the divers successe of these dreames according to Iosephs interpretaâ—â—â—n vers 19. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 1. It happened that two Eunuches offended H. the rest have not this clause but onely that the Butler and Bakâ—r offended The chiefe Butler and chiefe Baker S. The Butler and Baker caet v. 1 The Butler and Cooke T. Butler and Baker caet aphah signifieth to bake and to seeth and dresse meat it appeareth v. 17 that he had charge of the Kings meat v. 2. Pharaoh was angrie with them H. angrie with his two Eunuches S. two princes C. officers G. B. Courtiers T. Saris signifieth both and Eunuch and geâ—ded man as likewise a principall officer or man in authoritie v. 3. He sent them into the prison of the Captaine of the souldiers H.C. of the chiefe steward G. B. praefecti satellitum master of the guard T. principis lanionum the chiefe slaughter-man P. see before chap. 37.36 of the divers readings of the word tabach v. 3. In the place where Ioseph lay S. lay bound caet the house of them that were bound where Ioseph lay bound G. the round tower T. Soâ—ar a round vaulted place v. 5. They dreamed both a dreame the same night H. both one dreame in one night S. every one his dreame catâ—r Their visions were of their dreame S. each mans dreame of a divers interpretation S. according to the interpretation thereof câ—t The Butler and Baker of the King of Egypt which were bound in prison all have this clause but the Latin v. 13. Pharaoh shall remember thee C. remember thy service H. thine office S. â—â—mber thy head or â—eavie thine head T. lift up thy head B.G.P. heb v. 16. Three baskets of meale S. filled with principall or white bread C. three white baskets G. P. three white wicker baskets B. baskets full of holes T. char signifieth white and full of holes v. 17. All kinde of baken meats for Pharaoh cat all kind of meats dressed by the art of coquerie T. see before v. 1. v. 23. He forgot his interpreter H. remembred not Ioseph but forgâ—t him caet 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. What the offence was of Pharaohs chiefe Butler and Baker Vers. 1. THe Butler offended c. 1. This Butler and Baker that offended were not the under officers and therefore they which were set over them were punished as R. Ephraim Carus thinketh for it had not beene justice to punish one for an others fault but the same parties which offended were committed 2. Neither was this their offence because Pharaoh found a flye in the cup and a little stone in the bread as some Hebrewes imagine it is not like that so wise a Prince would punish so small offences with death some thinke they had attempted the chastitie of Pharaohs daughters but it is most like that it was some conspiracie or treason against the life of Pharaoh as we reade in the booke of Esther that two Eunuchs conspired against Assuerus Mercer QUEST 2. How the chiefe Butlers head is said to be lift up Vers. 13. WIthin three daies shall Pharaoh lift up or leavie thy head c. 1. Iunius exposition here is too curious that referreth this to that use and custome of tables made with rowes and ranks of holes with pegges against the which were written the names of the officers with their ministerie and services and that this peg is called the head and the boord or table the base or seat to the which the peg should be removed which signified the restoring of him to this place againe 2. I had rather with Mercerus understand by lifting up or leavying the head the numbering of him among the rest as the phrase is used Exod. 30.12 When thou liftest the head of the children of Israel that is takest the summe of them 3. But we neede not search further than with Musculus to take the plaine and ordinarie sense who by lifting up or leavying the head understandeth his advancement and restoring to his former condition as the head of Ioachim King of Iudah is said to be lift up when he was delivered out of prison 2. King 25.27 QUEST III. Whether Ioseph offended in making request to the Butler to remember him Vers. 14. HAve me in remembrance c. 1. The Hebrewes doe reprehend Ioseph for trusting to this meanes of his deliverance say that for this cause he was chastised with two yeares longer imprisonment to the same purpose writeth Augustin serm 82. de temp But although Ioseph was content to use the meanes which was offered yet there is no doubt he relied upon Gods providence still theerfore Ioseph is here reprehended without cause 2. Neither doth he make sale of his spirituall and propheticall gift
requiring this as a reward and recompence for this good tidings But by this he sheweth the certaintie of the Butlers good successe and favour with the King that if he made but mention of him to Pharaoh he might be delivered neither doth he aske this as a reward but taketh this occasion to do himselfe good for it is lawfull for a man to use all honest meanes for his libertie as the Apostle saith Art thou called being a servant care not for it yet if thou canst be free use it rather 1 Cor. 7.21 Calvin 3. It may be that Ioseph was some what too confident upon this meanes as though this were the way that God had appointed for his deliverance and therefore God would exercise Iosephs patience still so that Ioseph failed not in diffidence and distrust in betaking himselfe to the meanes but rather herein that he limiteth Gods providence both for the meanes and the time that even now and by this meanes he hasteth to be delivered Calvin Mercer QUEST IIII. How Ioseph is said to be stollen away Vers. 15. I Was stolen away by theft out of the land of the Hebrewes 1. This theft was not committed by the Ismaelites who bought Ioseph for their money but by his owne bretheren who committed a theft two waies both because they sold a freeman not taken in battel nor brought into bondage which by Moses Law was punished with death Exod. 21.16 and in that they did robbe their father of his child Perer. 2. Hebron is not here meant by the land of the Hebrews as Ramban because that was the principall place of abode for Abraham Isaack and Iacob but the land of Canaan is thus called where the Hebrewes dwelt which Ioseph so calleth rather than Canaan because he abhorred to be counted of that nation Mercer QUEST V. How the chiefe Baker his head is said to be lifted up 〈◊〉 leavied Vers. 19. WIthin three daies Pharaoh shall take thine head from thee or leavie thine head off from thee c. 1. Iunius readeth thus Pharaoh numbering thee shall cause theâ— no more to be numbered and hee referreth it as before to the removing or taking away of his pegge which he taketh for his head out of his hole or place in the table but this seemeth to be too curious 2. Neither with some other doe I thinke that the chiefe Baker was beheaded for the text saith he was hanged upon a tâ—ee which needed not if he were first beheaded 3. Some make the meaning of the phrase to be this that Pharaoh would take away his life from him and the Latines say capite plecti to lose the head that is to be put to death hence they are called capitall crimes that are punished by the losse of the head or life Mercer 4. The most reade shall take thine head from thee but he was hanged not beheaded 5. Some thinke he was first beheaded and then hanged as the manner is yet in some countries Osiand But in that the Butlers head was lift up as well as the Bakers vers 20. this phrase doth not shew his punishment for then the effect vers 20. should not answer to the prophecie 6. Some understand it of his hanging that his head was lift up upon him as our Saviour calleth his hanging upon the crosse his exaltation or lifting up Ioh. 3.14 Pellican But this cannot be the meaning because the same phrase is used both of the Butler and Baker 7. This therefore is the sense that Pharaoh should lift up his head aloft out of prison and cause his name to be rehearsed and so his head to be leavied among the rest of his servants and take cognizance of both their causes but the one he should hang and restore the other So Ioseph doth foretell unto them three things whereof the first the leavying of the head and examining their cause is common to them both the other two things are peculiar to either the Butler shall be restored to his office and minister the cup to the King vers 13. the Baker shall be put from his office and no more reckoned or leavied among the officers and be hanged this then is the true reading of the words Pharaoh shall leavie thine head from upon thee that is that no more leavying or reckoning be made upon thee which words may be supplied by the contrarie vers 13. and the exposition of the praeposition ghal used there to thine office and mâ—ghal from off expressed here doe insinuate as much so also the same word meghaleca from off thee is used in the end of this verse and Deut. 8.4 Thy garments 〈◊〉 not waxe old from off thee that is to be no more upon thee and so to be used by thee QUEST VI. Whether Ioseph used any preamble to his interpretation Vers. 19. THe birds shall eat thy flesh 1. It is like that Ioseph being to deliver so hard an interpretation of the Bakers dreame did use some preface to excuse himselfe as Philo bringeth him in thus speaking Vtinam tale somnium non vidisses c. I would thou hadst either not seene this dreame or not declared it to me and it is not unlike but that Ioseph used some such preparation as Daniel did when he was to expound Nebuchadnezzars dreame The dreame be to them that hate thee and the interpretation thereof to thine enemies Dan. 4.16 2. This hanging of malefactors upon a tree seemeth to have beene an ancient punishment and it was counted a most ignominious death and therefore Saint Paul setteth forth the great humilitie of Christ that humbled himselfe even to the death of the crosse Philip. 2. The Latine translator readeth he shall hang thee on the crosse which kinde of death was used also among the Romanes as Tully saith Facinus est vincire civem Romanum scelus verberare quid dicam in crucem tollerâ— It is a great offence to binde a Citizen of Rome a greater to beat him the greatest to set him on the Crosse Cicer. Verrem 7. 3. Such as were hanged to death among the Israelites by the law were to be taken downe and buried the same day Deut. 21.23 But it seemeth that this use was not observed among the Gentiles but their bodies did hang to be meat to the fowles of the ayre Perer. which may be noted as a great judgement of God when the Lord suffereth his owne image in man to be so defaced and his flesh to be given for meat to the fowles and beasts whose flesh is appointed to be mans food as the Lord threatned against Ieroboam and his house that they which died in the Citie should be eaten of dogges they which died in the fields should be devoured of the fowles of heaven 1 King 14.11 Muscul. QUEST VII Whether lawfull to keepe the memorie of the birth-day Vers. 20. PHaraohs birth-day 1. This was a very ancient custome to celebrate the birth-daies of Kings and Princes both among the Medes and Persians as witnesseth Xenophon lib.
poenitentiam That he which committed adulterie after publike penance should finally be denied the Communion In Hieromes time it seemeth that adulterie was punished by death who in a certaine epistle maketh mention of a young man qui adulterâ—i insimulatus ad mortem trahitur who being accused of adultery was led forth to death yet Augustine as is shewed before reasoneth against it but of all other Origen writeth most plainly Apud Christianos si adulterium fuerit admissum c. Among Christians if adulterie be committed it is not commanded that the adulterer or adulteresse bee punished with corporall death c. neither therefore was the law cruell then neither now doth the Gospell seeme to bee dissolute but in them both the benignitie of God appeareth yet by a divers dispensation then by the death of the bodie the people was rather purged from their sinnes than condemned but unto us sinne is purged not by corporall punishment but by repentance and it is to be seene unto lest our punishment be greater whose vengeance is laid up for the next world when as they were absolved from their sinne by the paying of the punishment as the Apostle saith how much more punishment is he worthy of that treadeth under foote the Sonne of God Two reasons Origen yeeldeth of this his opinion that there is now a mitigation of the rigour of Moses law because then it served as an expiation of their sinnes prefiguring the death of Christ as S. Paul applieth that sentence Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree which is generally delivered by Moses to the particular death of Christ Galat. 3.13 but now the expiation of sinne is by repentance and remission of sinnes in Christ. Againe now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospell even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now for God punisheth not twice for the same thing as Origen in the same place alleageth Yet although we contend that the capitall punishment of Moses law may now be dispensed with in some cases upon the reasons before alleaged this is not either to condemne those Common-wealths which doe reteine still and practise the severity of Moses law against adulterers who therein sinne not but as Ambrose saith of the Apostles that asked for fire to come downe upon the Samaritanes Nec discipuli peccant legem sequentes Yet did not the Disciples offend following the law neither to excuse those places where this sinne is too easily and lightly punished as Erasmus complaineth in his time Nunc adulterium lusus magnatum est Now adulterie is but a sport of great men Where adulterie is not capitally punished yet great severity otherwise should be used as it was decreed in the Elibâ—rin Councell that he which having a wife committed adulterie should be under penance five yeeres can 〈◊〉 He that did sinne that way after should not bee received to the peace of the Church till his dying 〈…〉 that did commit adulterie after penance should never be restored to the communion of the Chuâ—â—â— c. 7. These or such like severe constitutions this wanton and lascivious age hath need of that this overflowing sinne might be kept in with higher bankes than now it is So then I conclude this point with Cyprian who speaking of divers kindes of Ecclesiasticall censure used in divers places thus writeth Manente concordia vinculo actum suum disponit dirigit unusquisque Episcopus c. The bond of amity remaining still every Bishop so directeth and disposeth his owne act that he is thereof to give account unto God The like may bee said of Princes and Magistrates in their dominions and regiments that the difference in publike punishments all intending the glorie of God and the brideling of sinne is no cause to breake peace or breede jelousie betweene Christian states Now for the other part that Moses Judicials doe bind negatively that is where Moses Law inflicteth not death there Christian Magistrates are not to punish with death the reasons are these 1. Because then the regiment of the Gospell should exceed in terror the strictnesse and severitie of Moses Law 2. God is that one Lawgiver that saveth life and destroyeth Iam. 4.12 he gave life and he only hath right to take it away God hath created man in his image Gen. 9.6 which image is expressed in mans soule animating the bodie This image then is not to be defaced and dissolved but by warrant and direction from God therefore the equitie of the Judicials of Moses ought to be a rule either by generall direction or particular president to all Magistrates in what cases and for what sinnes they are to deprive the offendors of their life But here it will be objected that if this be so then all those Common-wealths are in error which punish theft by death which by Moses law is satisfied by making restitution Exod. 22.2 Ans. Even by Moses law some kinde of theft received a capitall punishment as if it were a violent theft as it was lawfull to kill a theefe breaking into the house Exodâ—s 22.2 or a wanton theft as David judged him worthy to dye that having many sheepe of his owne tooke by violence the onely sheepe which his poore neighbour had 2. Sam. 12.5 Likewise publike theft and sacrilege in Achan was punished by death Iosh. 7. But that simple theft when a man stealeth only to satisfie his hungrie soule or to supply his present necessitie should be proceeded against to the losse of life it seemeth hard And as I take it the lawes of this land have used a good consideration herein that such small felons should escape by their booke wherein to my understanding greater clemencie and favour in some Judges were more commendable who require an exactnesse of such simple clerkes unlesse they bee such as are worthy for other former evill demerits to be cut off as rotten members There is a saying in the law Favores sunt ampliandi Where favour is intended it should be the largest way extended It were also to be wished that a greater valuation were yet set than of the usuall rate in such small fellonies when a man is to bee judged for his life By Dioclesians law some kindes of theft are charged with restitution of foure fold by another authentike law the theefe is adjudged to bee beaten with clubbes By the Decrees Qui fecâ—rit furtum capitale c. Hee that committed any capitall theft as in breaking into an house in stealing a beast or some other thing of price if he were a Clergie man he was to be under penance seven yeeres if a lay man five if it were a small theft he was to make restitution and to doe penance one yeere By any of these or the like constitutions sufficient provision might be made against simple theft But it can no wayes be justified that such simple theft should bee more straightly
his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1 Cor. 12.21
and confut 1. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God overruleth mens affections Vers. 3. THe Lord gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians Hereby wee learne that God hath the ruling and turning of mens affections he can worke them either to favour or disfavour Piscat So the Wiseman saith As the rivers of waters the Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord â—e tâ—â—neth it whither soever it pleaseth him Prov 21.1 Like as the husband man maketh furrowes in his ground and draweth the water which way it pleaseth him and as the sternes man in the vessell doth move it which way he listeth so can the Lord order and governe the streames of mens affections 2. Doct. Godly men have their passions and affections Vers. 8. SO he went out from Pharaoh very angry Even wise and godly men have their affections it iâ— not as the Stoikes taught that there is a vacuity and absence of them in wise and perfect men They are not without affections but they rule them by reason and their reason is sanctified by grace The Apostle saith be angry but sinne not Ephes. 4.26 He alloweth to be angry but not to sinne in anger Christ the most perfect man that ever was had his affections as of anger Marke 3.5 He looked round about him â—â—gerly of joy Luk. 10.21 Iesus rejoyced in spirit of sorrow Matth. 26.38 My soule is heavy unto death of love as Ioh. 13.23 The disciple whom Iesus loved 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against Purgatory BEfore in the third question where it is disputed what Angels God used in bringing the last plague of death of the first borne upon Egypt Pererius sheweth the difference betweene the ministry of the Angels in this life and in the next falling to make mention of purgatory for they cannot doe otherwise for ther lives but upon every occasion broach their owne fansies leaveth it as uncertaine and undiscussed whether the good Angels or the bad should be ministers of purgatory he thinketh not the bad that they should exercise power over them which in their life time did conquere the Devill neither yet will hee have them to be the good It is an unmeet thing saith he that they which shortly should become the fellowes and partakers of the blessed Angels in heaven should bee punished by them Perer. 1. disput in cap. 11. Contra. 1. Let any reasonable man judge whether it be not like that purgatory should be a meere fansie where there is supposed to bee torments and yet no tormentor In that hee thinketh that neither good Angels nor bad are the ministers of those torments I condescend to him who then not Christ I am sure for he hath redeemed them nor yet God himselfe for the Apostle saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen it is God that justifiâ—th who shall condemne Rom. 8.33.34 God hath justified them by faith in Christ and being justified there is nothing further to be laid to their charge If then there be no tormenter in purgatory there is no torment in purgatory and so purgatory fire is quite quenched and put out 2. Beside this uncertainty who should be the tormenters there be other maine points not yet resolved of among them concerning purgatory as of the place where it is of the fire what it is corporall or spirituall of the time how long it shall last whether hundred yeeres or thousands of the greatnesse of the paine whether it exceed all the torments and punishments of this life These articles are not yet defined and determined among them as Bellarmine sheweth lib. de purgat from chap. 6. to chap. 14. Therefore we will leave them to their uncertainties and as they make question of the circumstances of purgatory so we will not onely make question of purgatory it selfe but are most sure that it is but an invention of their owne for all they which dye in the Lord that is in the faith of Christ are pronounced blessed and to rest from their labours and their workes follow them Revel 14.13 Here are three arguments against purgatory They which dye in the faith of Christ are blessed but they which are in hell torments for purgatory they make part of hell are not blessed They doe rest from their labours but they which are in purgatory are in labour and paine Their workes follow them for their reward but they which are tormented â—nd punished are not rewarded Therefore wee acknowledge no other purgatory but in this life a perfect purgation of our sinnes in Christ Heb. 12.3 and an imperfect which is by the fiery probation of affliction as S. Peter calleth it Thinke it not strange concerning the fiery triall which is among you to prove you 1. Pet. 4.12 2. Confut. Against the Manichees which reject the old Testament Vers. 10. BVt the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart Hence the Manichees tooke occasion to utter their blasphemies against the God of the old Testament and to reject the Scriptures themselves of the old Testament as proceeding from a God that was a worker of evill in hardning mens hearts These Augustine confuteth at large hom 88. de tempore shewing how God is said to harden the heart without any touch of sinne for thus he writeth Non Pharaonem Dei violentia sed propria impietas obduravit Not any violence from God but Pharaohs owne impiety did harden him And these words I will harden Pharaohs heart he expoundeth thus Cum abfuerit ei gratis mea obduret illum nequitia sua when my grace is from him then his owne wickednesse shall harden him 2. Then he doth illustrate it by this similitude as the water is frozen till the Sun shine upon it then it resolveth and so soone as the Sunne is departed it is bound with cold againe the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it selfe so properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it is hardned 3. But if the question be asked why the Lord suffereth any to be hardned he maketh this answer Aut illorum iniquitati qui obdurari merentur adscribendum aut ad inscruâ—abilia Dei judicia referendum quae plerunque sunt occulta nunquam autem injusta This must â—â—thâ—r be ascribed to their iniquity which deserve to be hardned or it must be referred to the judgements of God which are often hid but never unjust It sufficeth 〈◊〉 to know and beleeve as the Apostle saith Rom. 9. Is there iniquity with God 3. Confut. Against Pererius that thinketh none in this life to be without hope of grace and repentance NOw further whereas Pererius in the treatise of induration moveth this disputation whether any man can be so hardned in this life as that he become altogether impenitent and incorrigible and without hope of grace and resolveth upon the negative part that none in this life are in such desperate state it shall
the Sabbath which was the seventh day but it is taken for any festivall day of rest and may here bee translated the morrow after the rest Iun. because upon the first day of the pasch they were commanded to rest 5. This they did in presenting their first fruits unto God both for remembrance of that time when they came out of Egypt which was in the moneth Abib the moneth of new fruits as also to stirre them to bee thankfull unto God and to acknowledge him to be the giver and author of their abundance and plentie Pererius QUEST XXVI Whether the seventh day were more solemne than the first Vers. 16. ALso in the seventh day shall bee an holy assemblie Here the solemnitie of the first and seventh day seeme to be alike But Levit. 23.8 the Latine translator readeth thus Dies septimus erit celebrior sanctior The seventh day shall bee more solemne and holy Unto this objection divers answers are framed 1. It is called holier because this day is by speciall words called a day of restraint or of a solemne assemblie Deut. 16.8 Wherein it being the last day of the Feast there was a great assemblie of the people gathered together to praise God So in the same sense the last day of the Feast of Tabernacles is called the great day Ioh. 7.37 2. Others answer that it was greater not in comparison of the first day but of the other comming betweene Lyran. 3. But the best answer is that in the originall there is no degree of comparison but as it is said of the first day there shall be therein an holy convocation so it is said of the seventh Thâ—â—e shall bee an holy assemblie or convocation Perer. So here a question is moved questionlesse and needlesse 4. Now the reason why the first and the seventh day were more solemne than the rest may be this because on the first day of the Passeover they went out of Egypt and on the seventh day they passed through the red sea and these two dayes in remembrance of these two great benefits they kept with greater solemnitie this generally is the opinion of the Jewes and the reasons to confirme it may be these two first because as in the first day there was an holy convocation so also was there on the last when Moses and all Israel gave solemne thanks unto God Exod. 15. And beside the manner and order of their travell agreeth thereunto for on the 15. day they came to Succoth on the 17. to Ethom to Pi-hahiroth or the mouth of Chiroth on the 18. day there they staied where Pharaoh overtooke them the 20. and the night following they went over the red Sea Iunius QUEST XXVII Why the seventh day is called a day of restraint Deut. 16.8 BUt whereas it is said Deut. 16.8 on the seventh day of the paschall solemnitie shall be a restraint oâ— solemne assemblie where the Latine translator readeth collecta there shall be a collection here ariseth a question about the meaning of these words 1. They which defend this translation some doe expound it of the collection which was made toward the expences of the temple Thomas But against this sense both Lyranus his reason may bee urged because the morrow after the pasch it was lawfull for the people to returne home Deut. 16.7 and therefore it is not like that collection was made after their departure as also Paulus Burgensis sheweth out of the sentence of the Hebrewes that collection was used to be made for the temple throughout all Palestina upon the first day of the twelfth moneth Pererius also alleageth that place 2 Chron. 7.8 that Salomon Fecit die octava collectam Made a collâ—ction upon the eight day but saith he it is not like that so rich a King as Salomon made any collection of mony Therefore Pererius interpreteth it of the solemne collection and gathering together of the people upon that day to give God thanks solemnely and publikely for their mightie and glorious deliverance out of Egypt But all this businesse will soone be at an end if the vulgar Latine interpretation be refused as not so agreeable to the originall word which signifieth rather a restraint as even now shall be shewed 2. The Septuagint also are as wide which doe translate the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the going out because then the Feast was at an end but this is not the meaning of the word though it be true that then the people were dismissed as Salomon upon the eight solemne day of the Feast of Tabernacles sent away the people 1 King 8.66 having kept that day as a time of restraint 2 Chron. 7.7 at even he gave them leave to depart for so these places are reconciled 3. Therefore the meaning rather is that it was a time of restraint the people were kept and restrained from worke upon that day so the word ghatzer signifies to forbid or restraine Lyran. Montan. Iun. And though the first day also were a day of restraint wherein they were forbidden all worke save about their meat yet it seemeth that this was the greater day being the conclusion and determination of the Feast as these two are joyned together the last and great day of the Feast Iohn 7.37 as iâ— shewed before QUEST XXVIII Why he which did not eat unleavened bread was to be cut off Vers. 19. THat soule shall be cut off from the congregation of Israel 1. Some doe expound this onely of the capitall punishment that such as neglected or contemned this observation of unleavened bread should be put to death and so is this phrase taken Exod. 30.33 and 31. vers 14. and in other places Simler Piscat But though it be not denied that in some places this phrase to bee cut off from Israel signifieth onely the taking away of the life of the offender as in the places given in instance yet alwayes it is not so taken for Genes 17.14 it signifieth the cutting off from the societie and the communion of the Saints both in this life and in the next as may appeare by the reason there given because he hath transgressed my covenant 2. Neither is it referred onely to the spirituall punishment as Osiander expoundeth this place by that of the Apostle that he which eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh his owne damnation 1 Cor. 11.29 for under the law the punishment of death was used in the like transgressions in the contempt of the law as for violating the Sabbath 3. Therefore this sentence pronounced against such contemners includeth a penaltie both upon the bodie and the soule and of this strict severitie two reasons may be given the one from the authoritie of the law-maker God that gave us both bodies and soules and all other good things beside hath power to make lawes both to binde the bodie and the soule and the contempt of his Commandements is worthie of capitall punishment the other reason is taken from the constitution it selfe
the Egyptians would pay and recompence them for all their labour and service in their brick-workes in building of them houses and Cities whereupon the Egyptians casting up their account and finding that their wages at a very meane rate would farre exceed the value of their jewels were contented that the Hebrewes should enjoy them Now if this were so then the equity of this fact will easily appeare but because this tradition is uncertaine neither is there thereof any mention made in Scripture it is not to be stood upon a better satisfaction may be found out 3. Therefore first of all this is sufficient to excuse the Israelites that they did herein as they were commanded and whatsoever the Lord biddeth it is no sinne to doe nay it is sinne not to doe it as Augustine well saith Quod sane faciendo Moses usque adeo non peccavit ut non faciendo peccaret Moses in doing so was so farre from sinning that in not doing of it he had sinned thus also answer Calvin Simler Iun. with others 4. But the equity of this fact may further be evident though it sufficeth only to stand upon Gods will which is alwayes just Et rectissimum est quicquid facit and it is most right whatsoever hee doth Calvin or willeth to be done yet divers other reasons may bee yeelded to justifie this fact of the Israelites beside I say the authority of the Lord in commanding which excuseth the Israelites who were bound to be obedient in whatsoever was commanded as Augustine sheweth by this example like as in a common-wealth the minister or executioner of the Judge in putting him to death that is adjudged to dye offendeth not who if he should doe it of himselfe were a man-slayer so saith he Deo jubenti ministerium prabuerunt they did but yeeld their service and ministry to the commandement of God Beside this justification other reasons may be alleaged both on Gods behalfe and on the peoples First on Gods behalfe 1. He is the supreme and chiefe Lord of all and may by his imperiall right not onely give the substance of one to another but remove and dispossesse Kings and transpose Kingdomes from one to another Simler And therefore as Calvin saith Quae Deo placuit ad suos transferri aliena censeri non debent What God thinketh good to convey over unto his are not to be counted as belonging to another 2. The Egyptians abused their gold and other jewels in serving their idols therewith and so as Augustine saith Dei creatura male utentes ad Creatoris injuriam they wickedly abused the creature to the wrong of the Creator and therefore the Lord might most justly deprive them of that which they abused to his dishonour 3. Their intolerable contumacy and disobedience in refusing so often to obey the Lords commandement to let his people goe deserved no lesse than that they should bee punished with the losse of their precious substance seeing the Lord for the like stubbornenesse and obstinacy of the Cananites dispossessed them of their country and gave it to the Israelites Perer. Secondly in respect of the Israelites these reasons also may be rendred 1. The Israelites might detaine these things which the Egyptians gave them as their wages for their long labour and service in Egypt as it is said Wisdom 10.17 she gave the Saints the reward of their labours and as Philo further amplifieth Nec par est jactura libertatis pecuniae there is not the like reason of the losse of liberty and the losse of money the Israelites lost their liberty the Egyptians lost but part of their substance So the Lord promiseth unto Nebuchadnezzar Egypt for the wages of his army for the service they did in subduing of Tyrus Ezech. 29.18 Thus Israel had the substance of the Egyptians given them for their service Iun. 2. Beside the labour and toile of the Israelites in Egypt they were most cruelly oppressed their children most pitifully slaine and murdered therefore this was in stead of some recompence and satisfaction made for the wrongs which they had done them Perer. 3. Philo addeth this reason also Vt in bello victores victos bonis spoliâ—vâ—rant as being conquerers in battell they spoiled their enemies of their substance for they were as conquerers of the Egyptians not by stroke of battell but by the stroke of the Lords hand in these mighty miracles plagues and judgements whereby the stout and stubborne heart of Pharaoh was subdued Simler 4. Irenaeus saith further Debitores erant Hebraeis non solùm rerum sâ—d vitae suae propter patriarchae Iosâ—phi praecedentem benignitatem They were debters to the Hebrewes not only of their substance but of their life also for the former kindnesse and goodnesse of the patriarke Ioseph shewed unto them who delivered the Egyptians and their land from perishing by famine and governed the country 80. yeeres in all justice peace and tranquillity 5. But the best reason on the behalfe of the Israelites is that the Egyptians did voluntarily give them these things as a redemption of their lives and did wage them thereby to bee gone as Iosephus saith they gave them these things quo celeriùs discederent to hasten their departure the sooner this also may be gathered out of the text chap. 11.8 and 12 13. Iun. QUEST XLIV When the Israelites asked the jewels before the last plague or after ANother question is when the Israelites asked these jewels of the Egyptians at the very instant of their departure or before 1. Augustine and Cajetane consenting with him Ferus Pererius all these are of opinion that this was done before the last plague of the first borne Augustines reason is this Quomodo fieri posset ut in tanto luctu ex mortibus suorum commodarent ista filiis Israel How could it be that in so great heavinesse for the death of their children they would lend these things to the Israeliâ—es quaest 45. in Exod. But this might be a reason to make them willing to let them have what they desired to bee rid of them for they were afraid all of them of their lives if the Israelites had stayed still for they said we dye all vers 33. Cajetane would gather that they had borrowed these things before and the Egyptians through griefe forgetting to demand them againe the Israelites also being in haste carried them away because it is said they spoiled the Egyptians that is by carrying away the things which they had formerly borrowed But these words rather make against him for in that the Israelites are said then at their going away to have spoiled the Egyptians it sheweth that then they received the things of them whereof they spoiled them for otherwise they had spoiled them before when they received the things not purposing to restore them againe Ferus reason is because it is not like they would lend the Israelites their jewels at their going away But this doubt is removed because the text
saith That God gave them favour in the sight of the Egyptians neither did the Israelites borrow these things but they simply asked them and the other frankly gave them Pererius thinketh that the Israelites asked these things betweene the ninth and the tenth plague because when there was one plague yet behinde the Lord bad Moses to speake to the people to aske of the Egyptians chap. 11.2 But in that place only it is shewed what the Lord commanded Moses to doe hee spake to the people then to doe it but it was not acted then as likewise in the same place mention is made how the Lord would goe forth at midnight and smite all the first borne which was not done then but afterward 2. Wherefore I rather thinke with Calvin and Iunius that the Israelites asked these things of the Egyptians after the last plague immediatly before their departure the reasons are these 1. The Egyptians seeing their first borne slaine were afraid of their owne lives and therefore in respect thereof they regarded not their substance Tanquam si hoc pretio animas redemissent As if they had redeemed their lives with this price Iun. And as Calvin Hinc clamor ille desperationis index omnes mortui sumus hinc facilitas illa in dando supellectile Hence came that desperate cry wee are all dead men hence that facility in giving their house-hold stuffe 2. That this asking of the Egyptians came after all the plagues it is shewed chap. 3.20 I will smite Egypt with all my wonders c. after that shall he let them goe then it followeth in the next verse I will make this people to be favoured of the Egyptians c. for every man shall aske of his neighbour c. 3. The text saith that they shall put the jewels and raiment upon their sonnes and their daughters that is shall load them with them and lay them upon their shoulders it is like then they were upon going when they made their burthens 4. If they had asked them before it had beene only to borrow them not to have them of gift but it is shewed already that they did not borrow them quest 42. 5. They had no colour to borrow their jewels and costly rayment before for they asked them to set forth the service of God which was upon their going for Pharaoh said Goe serve the Lord as yee have said vers 31. QUEST XLV What kind of favour it was which the Lord gave the Israelites in the sight of the Egyptians Vers. 36. ANd the Lord gave the people favour c. 1. Some thinke that this favour was by reason of some supernaturall grace and amiable quality which was given unto the Israelites whereby the Egyptians were allured unto their love as the booke of Iudith saith was given unto Iudith an extraordinary comelinesse whereby she was commended to all that saw her Iudith chap. 10. 2. Another opinion is that this favour was wrought rather in the hearts of the Egyptians toward the Israelites that the Lord who overruleth mens hearts did incline the affections of the Egyptians toward his people and this is the truer opinion as both may appeare by the use of the same phrase elsewhere as it is said that Ioseph found favour in his masters sight Gen. 39.3 which was not caused so much by Iosephs amiable person as by the working of his masters affection for the reason is there shewed of this favour his master saw that the Lord was with Ioseph so that the cause of this favour was not the externall object of Iosephs person but the internall effect of his masters affection likewise this is evident by the contrary for as it is said He turned their hearts to hate his people Psalm 105.25 so their hearts were turned againe to love and favour his people 3. Yet was it not such favour as Cajetane supposeth that the Egyptians prevented the peoples asking and forced them to aske as he would inferre upon the signification of the word Vajashilum which in hiphil he saith signifieth to cause or compell to aske But neither is the word so taken in hiphil but rather signifieth to lend or give one his asking as Anna using the same word 1. Sam. 1.28 saith shee had given or lent her sonne unto the Lord where hishilti in hiphil cannot be translated Shee had caused the Lord to aske And beside what needed that circumstance for the Egyptians to have forced the Israelites to aske and then to have given them their asking they might at once have given them unasked 4. Neither was this a worke of regeneration of the Egyptians whereby they suddenly of wolves became lambes as Master Calvin very well noteth but it was a speciall worke of Gods power onely at this time thus to sway their affections for they were soone changed againe when they pursued the Israelites with all hostility 5. And although this inclining of the Egyptians hearts and bending of their affections was Gods speciall worke yet it pleased the Lord to use some subordinate meanes to procure it and give occasion thereof as namely these two the one was the great reputation and estimation which Moses was in both with Pharaoh and with his people which reason is yeelded of this favour chap. 11.3 Calvin The other because the Egyptians by the death of their first borne were in such perplexity and feare that they were glad to give them any thing to redeeme their lives Thostatus So it is said in the Psalm 105.38 Egypt was glad at their departure QUEST XLVI Why the Lord enriched his people with the Egyptians substance NOW the reasons wherefore the Lord gave the Israelites such favour and thereby enriched them were these 1. To accomplish the promise made to Abraham Gen. 15.14 That the people should come out with great substance Osiander 2. For the comfort of the Israelites whom the Egyptians before had stripped of that they had and divers wayes oppressed now some amends is made them by possessing the precious jewels of the Egyptians Ferus 3. As also by this meanes the Egyptians were animated to pursue and follow after the Israelites to their owne confusion and destruction Ferus 4. And hereby the Israelites were furnished with many rich ornaments which afterwards served for the adorning and beautifying of the Tabernacle Ferus QUEST XLVII Of which Egyptians they asked and who of the Israelites and what Vers. 35. THey asked of the Egyptians 1. These were not the Egyptians inhabiting out of the land of Goshen as some thinke because it is like if any had inhabited among the Israelites they should have beene exempted from the plagues of Egypt which is not to be thought But this followeth not for such plagues as befell either the persons of the Egyptians or their proper substance might as well be laid upon the Egyptians dwelling among the Israelites as upon others as is shewed before quest 33. in 7 chap. And that these Egyptians of whom the Israelites asked these things
and smoke by day and the shining of flaming fire by night c. and a covering shall be for a shadow in the day for the heate c. Isai. 4.5.6 QUEST XX. How this cloud differed from other clouds THis piller of the cloud was much differing from all other cloudes 1. In respect of the substance it was cleere and lightsome not darke and thicke as other cloudes are 2. It was in figure and shape as a piller the nether part thereof descending unto the Tabernacle the upper part reaching aloft unto heaven whereas other cloudes descend not as low as the earth 3. It alwayes kept this figure and fashion of a piller whereas other cloudes doe alter and vary in shape and appearance 4. This cloud moved of it selfe whereas other cloudes are moved by the wind and of themselves have no motion this way or that way but only as they ascend and goe up in vapors but this cloud both ascended and descended 5. Other cloudes are made of naturall causes as of vapors and exhalations but this cloud was raised by the Lord beside the ordinarie course of nature 6. The effects were divers for other cloudes are apt to engender raine and drop downe moisture but this was not ordained for that end but to shew them the way in going before them 7. This cloud differed in motion from all other cloudes for they are carried all one way with the wind this sometime went forward when the camp removed sometime it came backe and stood upon the Tabernacle it went sometime to the right hand sometime to the left according as the journies of the people were appointed out 8. The motion of it was alwayes certaine it went before the campe as they were able to endure to follow whereas other cloudes are carried swiftly that they cannot bee followed 9. The situation of it was divers not carried aloft as other cloudes which can be no direction to leade a man in his journey but this cloud was of such equall distance as it did part out their way before them like as the starre that guided the Wise men appeared below in the aire to conduct them Matth. 2.10 Lastly whereas other cloudes are not durable but are soone dissipated and dissolved by the wind and weather this cloud remained firme and so continued for the space of 40. yeeres Ex Perer. QUEST XXI· When the cloud began first to appeare BUt concerning the time of the first and last appearing of this cloud it is not like as Hierome thinketh that it went not before them till they came unto the third station in Etham because mention is first made of it there 1. For they had need as well before of a guide to direct them the way as afterward and therefore it is like that they had this direction in their first setting forth out of Egypt 2. As it is in the Psalm He made his people to goe out like sheepe and led them in the wildernesse like a flocke Psal. 78.52 where the Prophet alludeth unto the fashion of those countries where the shepheard goeth before and the sheepe follow after as our Saviour saith in the parable Ioh. 10.27 So the Lord went before his people as a shepheard in the cloudy and fierie piller even when he brought them out of Egypt 3. The Prophet Esâ—y also alluding unto this cloud saith That upon every place of mount Sion and the assemblies thereof shall be a cloud Esay 4.5 So that hence it may be gathered that the Israelites in every place and in all their assemblies and campes had the presence of this cloud 4. Then like as the Wise men saw the starre that brought them to Christ in the beginning of their journey as they say Wee have seene his starre in the East and are come to worship him Matth. 2.2 they first saw the starre and then came forth so it may bee thought that the Israelites saw this cloud in their first setting forth 5. The people had need to have had all encouragement in their first going forth and to be animated in their journey and therefore it is like that the Lord did at the very first shew these comfortable signes of his presence QUEST XXII When the cloud and fiery piller ceased ANd as the cloud appeared not so late as Hierome supposeth so neither was it taken out of their sighâ— so soone as the Hebrewes imagine for they say that after Aarons death who died on the first day of the first moneth in the 40. yeere after their departure out of Egypt Numb 33.38 the piller of the cloud and of the fire were no more seene and their reason is because that after that time no more mention is made of them Contra. First this is no sufficient reason for neither is there mention made of them a good while before 2. The words of the text are against their opinion for it is said That the Lord tooke not away the piller of the cloud by day nor the piller of fire by night from before the people Vers. 22. So then as long as they had need of this direction the Lord failed them not 3. Seeing the use of these pillers was to leade them the way that they might goe by day and by night it is like so long as they were in the way and travelled in the wildernesse they had the presence of the cloud the same cause remaining the meanes are like to have beene still continued But from the mount Hor where Aaron died untill they came to the plaine of Moab in the borders of the land of Canaan there were many solitary desert and waste places thorow the which they passed for divers of their stations were yet behind as appeareth Numb 33. that they had after they came from Mount Hor eight severall stations therefore it may well bee gathered that as they had the direction of the cloud in their other stations so also in these Perer. 4. Then like as the starre left not the Wise men till it had brought them to the very house where the holy 〈◊〉 was Matth. 2. So we may judge that the cloud left not the Israelites till they came into the land of Canaan whither the Lord intended to bring them QUEST XXIII Of the foure great miracles which the Lord wrought for the people in the desert THis extraordinary leading of the people by the going before of the piller of the cloud and fire was one of the great miracles which the Lord wrought for his people in the desert for as foure things are chiefly necessary for those that travell strength and health of body foode rayment and a guide so the Lord in every one of these wrought wonderfully for them 1. Their feete did not swell for the 〈◊〉 of forty yeeres Deut. 8.4 And of all that great multitude there being not so few in all as 2000. thousand seeing the third part of this number even 600. thousand were fighting men above twenty yeere old there was not one feeble
their time of rest during this three dayes journey Perer. But when they removed from the wildernesse of Sinai they went three dayes together without any stay the Arke still going before them to find out a resting place Numb 10.13 till they came to Kibroth Hatavah which was their next mansion place Numb 33.16 The Lord still animating and strengthning his people to go forward Iunius The third manner of staying was when the cloud remained still upon the Tabernacle two or three dayes and then they pitched their tents and thus the cloud staied in 40. yeere not above 42. times for so many mansion or camping places they had as they are set downe Numb 33. 4. Now how to know when they were to pitch their tents Pererius conjectureth at it and giveth these three rules First if the cloud stayed about noone then they knew that it onely rested till they had refreshed themselves but if it staied in the afternoone before night that they journeyed no more that day they tooke it that then they were to stay there some while and so pitched their tents But if it made no stay till the evening they pitched no tents till the next morning and then if the cloud went not forward they then set up their tents These are onely Pererius conjectures and uncertaine And it otherwise may be gathered out of the Scripture that they did not pitch their tents till the cloud had staied two dayes at the least as we read Numb 9.20 When the cloud abode a few dayes in the Tabernacle they pitched their tents at the commandement of God and afterward vers 22. If the cloud tarried two dayes or a moneth or a yeere upon the Tabernacle the children of Israel pitched their tents It seemeth then by this that this was a rule unto them not to pitch their tents or settle their campe till after two dayes Beside they had Moses to give them direction also in this case when to encampe themselves who continually consulted with God 5. Now the manner of their removing was this when the cloud arose from the Tabernacle the Priests and Levites tooke up the Arke and carried it and when they went forward with the Arke Moses used this prayer Rise up O Lord and let thine enemies bee scattered and let them that hate thee flee before thee And when the Arke rested hee said Returne O Lord to the many thousands of Israel Numb 10.35 Hereunto the Prophet alludeth when hee saith The Lord shall arise and his enemies shall be scattered Perer. 6. This cloud began not onely now to appeare when they were come to their third mansion place in Etham as Hierome thinketh but straightway upon their setting forth from Ramesis though mention be made first of it here that proveth it not now first to have appeared as Moses is said first in this place to have taken Iosephs bones with him which was done notwithstanding at his first comming out of Egypt the Scripture observeth not alwayes the order of time in setting downe matters of historie but the coherence of the argument So neither did the cloud leave them at Aarons death as is the opinion of the Hebrewes for seven moneths after Aarons death who died in the fift moneth immediatly before Moses death when Iosuah was consecrated to succeed him mention is made of the piller of the cloud wherein the Lord appeared to Moses Deut. 31.15 See more of this quest 22. before 7. Gregorie maketh the appearing of the bright cloud by day a signe of Gods favour and mercie to his obedient people and the appearing of the terrible fire by night as a signe of his severitie and justice against the wicked and unbeleevers Gregor hom 21. in Evangel Ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the lawfull use of ceremonies Vers. 9. THis shall be as a signe unto thee upon thine hand c. As this place sheweth that there were then in the Church and so are still commendable ceremonies which the Lord hath instituted to be â—â—membrances of spirituall things as these were of their deliverance out of Egypt so their superstition is reproved that dwell in the externall ceremony not looking unto the spirituall sense Ferus as the Pharisies did which did weare their phylacteries and fringes yet forgot the law represented and signified by them 2. Doct. Christ the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament Vers. 21. IEhovah went before them He that is here called Iehovah is chap. 14.19 called the Angell of God which was none other but Jesus Christ Iun. the Prince and Captaine of his Church the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament according as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.9 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also is for ever 3. Doct. Christ sheweth us the way to the heavenly Canaan as the piller did direct the Israelites toward their Canaan Vers. 22. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of fire This piller divers wayes represented Christ 1. He is the piller and upholder of his Church 2. He leadeth us the way unto eternall life as he himselfe saith I am the way the truth and the life Ioh. 14. 3. Aperit nobis viam maris rubei id est gratiam baptismi sanguine suo rubentes He openeth to us the way of the red sea that is the grace of baptisme died red in his bloud Rupertus 4. Christ is both a fire and a cloud that is both God and man 5. In noctâ— veteris testamenti paucis lucebat c. He did shine but to a few in the night of the old Testament as this fierie cloud gave light by night Ferus 6. But the most lively signification is this that Christ is that covering cloud under whose shadow wee are defended from the heate and stormes of temptation as the Prophet sheweth Isai. 4.6 Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the theatricall Pagean of the Masse Vers. 9. THey shall be a signe unto thee upon thine head These externall signets upon the head and frontlets betweene the eyes instituted at the first to a good end to put them in minde alwayes of the law of God they afterward superstitiously abused onely glorying in the outward ostentation of them so in Poperie the right use of the Supper of the Lord is turned into theatricum quâ—ndam actum Missa into a theatricall shew of the Masse calling men à communione ad spectaculum from the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ to a gazing spectacle Simlerus 2. Conf. Against the adoration of reliques Vers. 19. MOses tooke the bones of Ioseph This maketh nothing for the adoration of the reliques of Saints which idolatrous use is still retained and practised in Poperie for Iosephs bones were carried to be buried they tooke up the bones of Saints and Martyrs after they have beene buried these were true bones they shew counters and ducks bones and such like trash for the bones of the Saints as hath beene found by
to have beene ten the first for want of water Exod. 17. the second likewise for water Numb 20. the third Exod. 14. when the Egyptians pursued them the fourth and fifth about Manna when they kept it till the morning and gathered it upon the Sabbath Exod. 16. The sixth murmuring was for flesh Exod. 16. and the seventh for flesh likewise Numb 11.4 The eighth for Moses absence when they made the golden Calfe the ninth when they tempted God in fighting against the Amalckites being forbidden Numb 14. The tenth upon the returne of the Spies which were sent to search the Land of Canaan Hieron dâ— 10. tentationib But if all the murmurings of the Israelites be summed together they will bee found more than ten not fewer than twenty And they were of three sorts either generall of the whole congregation or speciall of some few or particular of some principall persons 1. Their generall murmurings were upon these occasions first for things which they endured as the increasing of their bondage in Egypt at the first comming of Moses Exod. 5.21 their feare to be all destroyed of the Egyptians chap. 14.11 their wearinesse of the way Numb 11.1 their biting by Serpents Numb 21. Secondly for things which they wanted as for sweet and potable water Exod. 15.24 for bread chap. 16.3 for water in Rephidim Exod. 17. for flesh Numb 11. for water againe when Moses also offended Numb 20. Thirdly they murmured and disobeyed when any thing was imposed them which they liked not as twiâ—e they were disobedient about Manna in reserving it till the morning chap. 16.19 and in gathering it upon the Sabbath chap. 16.28 where although their murmuring be not expressed yet this their refractary disobedience could not bee without murmuring So they rebelled in fighting against the Amalekites and Canaanites being forbidden Numb 14.41 Fourthly they murmured when their expectation was deceived as upon Moses long absence Exod. 32.1 when they heard a false report of Canaan that the inhabitants thereof were invincible Numb 14. when Core Dathan and Abiram with their adherents were suddenly destroyed Numb 16.41 These murmurings in all were sixteene 2. The second kind of murmuring was of some speciall men as Core Dathan and Abirain with two hundred and 50. persons murmured against Moses and Aaron Numb 16.3 The third kind was of some principall persons as of Aaron and Miriam against Moses Numb 12. Of Moses himselfe at the waters of strife Numb 20. of Aaron being discontent and so negligent in his office because of the death of his two sonnes Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10.19 Here are foure more and unto these others by diligent observations may be added QUEST XXXIX Whether the wood had any vertue in it that Moses cast â—nto the water 25. ANd he cried unto the Lord and the Lord shewed him a tree 1. The Hebrewes thinke that this tree had no vertue at all in it to make the waters sweet but rather the contrary but that God would therein shew his power in healing one contrary by another as Elizeus did heale the waters by casting in of salt which was more like to have made them more bitter and our Saviour anointed the eyes of the blinde with clay and spittle which was an unlike thing to heale them 2. But it is more probable that there was some vertue in this wood to season and relish the water because it is said that the Lord shewed him or as the Hebrew word signifieth taught him the tree Tanquam tale jam liguâ—â—â—oc esseâ— quo posset hoc fieri As though it were such a kinde of wood as could doe this thing So Augustine reasoneth quaest 57. in Exod. to whom Calvinus and Simlerus consent for to what end else did the Lord direct Moses to that speciall tree more than to others unlesse we say that there were no trees there at all in the desert But the words will inferre another sense that seeing the Lord shewed him a tree there was a tree to be shewed as the Lord caused Hagar to see a fountaine not which newly sprung out of the ground but which was there before though she saw it not Gen. 21. The author of Ecclesiasticus chap. 38.5 affirmeth that there was vertue in the wood 3. But Iosephus is deceived who saith Moses fructum ligni accepit forte ibi jacens That Moses tooke a peece of wood lying there by chance whereas the Lord shewed it him and he further addeth that Moses did not cast in the wood because the people asked what it should doe but caused a great part of the water to bee drawne out of the fountaine and so the residue became sweet but this is also directly contrary to the text QUEST XL. Wherein the miracle consisted of healing the waters NOw although there were some vertue in this wood to heale the waters yet it was done not without a great mâ—racle 1. Which consisted not herein because the Lord Ostendit et lignum ubi nullum erat Shewed him a tree where none was for this is confuted before 2. Neither Quâ—a in tali natura ligni Creator demonstrator lâ—â—dandus est Because the Creator and shewer is to be praised in giving such a nature to the wood as Augustine in the same place for if the nature of the wood had done it it had not beene miraculous 3. But herein was the miracle that by the meanes of so small a peece of wood such a deale of water was changed as served such a great multitude Calvin And that it was suddenly and presently changed Simler And the waters were but made sweet only for that time and afterward returned to their bitter nature againe as Pliny before alleaged maketh mention of bitter waters there Iun. QUEST XLI Why the Lord used this meane in healing of the waters GOd could have healed the waters if it had pleased him without this tree But it pleased him to use this meanes for these causes 1. To teach us that we should not neglect the meanes which God appointed So the Lord divided the red sea and dried the way by a strong East winde Ezechias was healed by a lumpe of figges So God instructeth men and begetteth them to the faith by the ministery of men Simler 2. God hereby also reproveth their distrust and diffidence shewing Multa sibi in promptu esse remedia quibusque malis That he hath many remedies in store for whatsoever evils Calvin 3. Hoc medio uti voluit propter mysterium He would use this meane because of the mystery Ferus QUEST XLII Of the mysticall signification of this tree NOw what mystery is signified in this tree that sweetned the waters shall bee shewed in a word 1. Some by the bitter waters doe understand the killing letter of the Law which is impotable and unpleasant but being qualified by the Gospell Iam dulcâ—â— erit litera The letter of the Law becommeth pleasant Ferus 2. This tree was a figure of that rod which should come of the
much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta sunt for so also the flesh
and terror love and feare for a Fountaine cannot make both salt water and sweet Iam. 3.12 But the law is the minister of death of feare and terror Ergo not of life and peace and so consequently not of the faith of the Gospell which bringeth all these 3. The same thing doth not both make the wound and give a plaister to heale it The law doth shew us our sinne faith by grace in Christ healeth it the law reviveth sinne Without the law sinne is dead Rom. 7.8 but we are dead to sinne and alive to God in Iesus Christ our Lord Rom. 6.11 The same cannot make us both to die unto sinne and revive sinne the law doth the one therefore not the other So Augustine saith Ad hoc data est lex ut vulnera ostenderet peccatorum qua gratiae benedictione sanaret Therefore was the law given that it should shew the wounds of our sinnes which it should heale by the benediction of grace August de poenitent medic 4. The Preachers publishers and givers of the law and Gospell are divers The law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Ioh. 1.17 But if justifying faith were commanded in the law then grace also should come by the ministrie of Moses that gave the law This is Bernards reason who further inferreth thus Venit prâ—inde gratia plenus veritate Dominus noster c. Therefore Christ our Lord came full of grace and truth that what could not bee done by the law might bee fulfilled by grace Serm. parâ— 28. 5. The qualities and conditions of the law and the Gospell are divers the law promiseth life to him that worketh Moses thus describeth the righteousnesse of the law That the man which doth these things shall live thereby Rom. 10.5 But the Gospell requireth not the condition of working but beleeving to him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 If then faith were commanded in the law to beleeve should also be a worke of the law then the Apostles conclusion were in vaine I conclude that a man is justified by faith without the works of the law But if faith be excluded out of the works of the law then it is not commanded or contained in the law for then it should be a worke of the law 2. Further the invocation of Angels and Saints which is commonly practised and stifly maintained in the Church of Rome is another apparent transgression of this first commandement because they give a speciall part of the divine worship which consisteth in prayer and invocation unto the creature First we will see and examine the arguments produced by the Romanists in defence of this superstition and then by other reasons out of the Scriptures convince and confute them The Romanists Arguments answered brought in defence of the invocation of Saints 1. THe Saints doe pray for us therefore we may and ought to pray them The antecedent or first part that the Saints doe pray for us they would prove by these places of Scripture Exod. 32.13 Moses thus saith in his prayer Remember Abraham Izhak and Iakob thy servants c. Ierem. 15.1 Though Moses and Samuel stood before me yet could not my affection be toward this people Baruch 3.4 O Lord God almightie heare now the prayer of the dead Israelites 2 Macchab. 14.15 And Onias spake and said This is a lover of the brethren who prayeth much for the peoplâ— to wit Ieremias the Prophet of the Lord. Answ. 1. As for the testimonies cited out of Baruch and the booke of Macchabees they prove nothing because they are no books of Canonicall Scripture 2. The other testimonies are impertinently alleaged for in the first Moses maketh no mention of the prayers which Abraham Izhak and Iakob should make for the people but of the covenant which the Lord made with them In the other of an hypotheticall and conditionall proposition they make a categoricall and absolute affirmation The text is If Moses and Samuel stood they inferre that Moses and Samuel did stand Simler But it may better be answered that if these were alive among the people to stand before the Lord for them in prayer c. as see the like Ezech. 14.14 Though these three men Noah Daniel and Iob were among them they should deliver but their owne soules by their righteousnesse 3. The Saints doe pray unto God by their generall wishes and desires as wishing that the Kingdome of God were accomplished as Revel 6.10 The soules under the Altar crie with a loud voyce saying How long Lord c. doest thou not judge and avenge our bloud But our particular necessities they are ignorant of and so doe noâ— make particular requests for us therefore the argument followeth not they pray by their generall desires for the Church Ergo they pray for us in particular 4. Seeing that the Romanists doe hold that the Patriarks and Fathers of the old Testament were in Limbo which they make a member or part of hell they doe contradict themselves in making them mediatours and intercessours in heaven 2. Argum. The Angels they say know our affaires and pray for us As Zachar. 1.12 The Angell of Iehovah answered and said O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou bee unmercifull to Ierusalem c. Therefore it is lawfull to pray to the Angels Answ. 1. That the Angels doe report our affaires unto God and so may make relation of our prayers and words also as of our other gests and acts unto God as the Lords messengers and ministers we will not denie but that they make any particular requests for men the Scripture no where speaketh and we are not bound to beleeve the relation of our prayers unto God is one thing and mediation and intercession is another 2. That Angell of Iehovah which prayed for Jerusalem was the Lord Christ who maketh intercession for his Church unto whom the rest of the Angels returne their message vers 11. who is also called Iehovah vers 20. 3. Neither doth it follow if it could bee proved out of Scripture that the Angels prayed foâ— us that we are to pray to them because they are not alwayes present to heare us and we are forbidden in Scripture to worship them Revel 22.9 and therefore to pray unto them which is a part of divine worship 3. Argum. The Saints that are living doe one pray for another much more the Saints being dead because their charitie is more perfect and seeing there is a communion of Saints as of the living so also of the dead which communion being not in faith and hope whereof there is no more use with them that are at rest it remaineth it is in charitie As therefore we may request the living to pray for us so we may pray the dead also to entreate for us Answer 1. The argument followeth not for the Saints alive doe one know anothers necessitie so do not the
quievit ab administrando God rested from creating another world but not from the administration and government thereof Lippoman as our blessed Saviour saith in the Gospell My father worketh and I woâ—ke 2. But God rested not as though he were wearie for virtus infinita non est fatigabilis an infinite power cannot be wearied as Gods power is infinite though Aristotle ignorantly denie it giving this for a reason why the earth moveth not because there is no power sufficient to stirre it out of the place lib. 2. de Caelo And beside potentia incorporea a power which is incorporeall is not subject to be wearie though it be not infinite as the Angels and the intellectuall part of man though this seeme sometime to bee dulled not in it selfe but in respect of the organes and instruments but if spirits of a finite nature are not fatigable or apt to be wearied much lesse God who is an infinite spirit Tostat. qu. 15. 3. Therefore God is said to rest both that this rest might bee mâ—numentum perfectae absolutae creationis a monument of the creation perfited and that God by his example might induce us in like manner to rest from our labours upon his Sabbaths QUEST XIV Of the changing of the Sabbath from the seventh day to the first day of the weeke THe seventh day 1. The Apostolicall Church changed the holy day of rest from the seventh day to the first which is the Lords day in remembrance of our Redemption by Christ which in the time of the new law is maximum beneficiorum recentissimum the greatest benefit and the newest and most fresh in memorie as the greatest benefit in the old law was the creation of the world 2. And although our redemption was purchased by the death of Christ yet because this benefit should not have a full perfection unlesse we should rise againe unto life eternall this day was to be assigned rather in memoriall of Christs resurrection than of his passion and though the rest of the Sabbath did signifie the rest of Christ in the grave having consummate and finished the painfull works of his passion yet because pretiosior nobis fuit resurrectio c. the resurrection of Christ was more precious unto us than his rest in the grave therefore not upon the Sabbath but upon the day of the resurrection doe we keepe an holy memoriall unto God Tostat. quaest 11. 3. The Apostolicall Church according to their Christian libertie in stead of the seventh day made choyce of the first in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ ut se à Iudaica synogoga discerneret that they might be discerned from the Jewish Synagogue Vrsin QUEST XV. How the Lord is said to have blessed and sanctified the day Vers. 11. THerefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day c. 1. Not that other dayes were accursed sed quod prae aliis hanc celebrem fecit but because he preferred this before the rest for if those dayes are counted blessed and had in remembrance wherein some good is wrought for the Church or Common-wealth much more this day wherein all things were finished Simler 2. Of the other six dayes it is not said the Lord blessed them for it was sufficient quod in singulis illis creatura productae sunt that in every one of them some creature was brought forth but of this day it is said God blessed and sanctified it what is this He sanctified it ab aliis illum segregavit he did separate and set it apart from other dayes Chrysost. homil 10. in Genes 3. Benedictio semper importat multiplicationem c. Blessing doth alwayes imply multiplying So God bestowed many blessings and good things upon this day beyond other dayes Tostat. qu. 16. 4. Isidore doth specially referre this Commandement to the holy Ghost for these reasons quia spiritus sanctus septiformis dicitur c. because the holy Ghost in respect of the manyfold graces thereof is said to be seven-fold the sanctifying of the seventh day peculiarly belongeth unto the Spirit quia non est nominata sanctificatio nisi in Sabbato and because no mention is made of sanctification but in the Sabbath day and further for that dono spiritus sancti nobis requies aeterna prâ—mittitur by the gift of the Spirit eternall rest is promised unto us whereof mention is made in this precept 5. But how is the Lord said to blesse the Sabbath here seeing the Lord saith by his Prophet I cannot suffer your new Moones and your Sabbaths Isai. 1.13 The answer is that the Jewes sinned carnaliter observantes sabbatum in observing the Sabbath carnally and so the Sabbath is not acceptable unto God but when it is so kept as that it putteth us in minde of our everlasting rest in the Kingdome of heaven Isidor 2. Places of Doctrine observed out of the fourth Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this Commandement IN this Commandement generally all such holy works and duties are prescribed to be done whereby the service of God is advanced and likewise therein is forbidden either the omission and neglect of such holy works or the prophanation thereof by all such works as do hinder the holy exercises and are contrary thereunto 1. In particular here is commanded the faithfull and diligent preaching and setting forth of the Word of God as the Apostle saith Wo is unto me if I preach not the Gospell 1 Cor. 9.16 and he chargeth Timothie to preach the Word to be instant in season and out of season 2 Tim. 4.2 Contrary to this dutie are 1. The neglect and omitting of teaching and preaching as the Prophet Esay reproveth the idle and carelesse watchmen They are all dumbe dogges they cannot barke they lie and sleepe and delight in sleeping Isai. 56.10 2. The abusing and counterfeiting of this holy function when the word of God is not sincerely and purely handled but according to mens fansies and humours but the Apostle saith We are not as those that make merchandize of the Word of God 2 Cor. 2.17 2. The often administration of the Sacraments as occasion serveth is another exercise whereby the Lords day is sanctified as Act. 2.42 They continued in the Apostles doctrine fellowship breaking of bread Contrary hereunto on the Ministers behalfe are 1. The negligent administration of the Sacraments and omitting to call upon the people often to resort unto them 2. The corrupting or perverting of the Sacraments as the Romanists have turned the Sacrament into a sacrifice being ordained for the living they applie it to the dead Christ biddeth us to eat and drinke it they hold it up to be gazed upon and in many such things have they degenerated from the institution of our blessed Saviour 3. The carefull hearing of the Word of God is commanded and diligent resorting to the exercises of religion as the Bereans are commended for searching the Scriptures whether those things were so which the
yea the land it selfe is polluted and defiled with bloud Numb 35.36 Galas 6. Mans bodie is the temple of the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 6.16 If any then destroy the temple of God him will God destroy 1 Cor. 3.17 7. The murtherer also sinneth against Christ whose member his neighbour is whose life hee hath sought So reasoneth the Apostle but in a divers case that he which causeth the weake brother to perish for whom Christ died sinneth against Christ himselfe 1 Cor. 8.11 QUEST XI How diversly murder is committed THis kinde of externall and actuall murther is committed two wayes either by a man himselfe or by another 1. The first is done two wayes either by the cruell shedding of mans bloud which is the most grievous sinne of all or by neglecting the meanes and not preserving our neighbours life either by helpe or counsell when it is in our power as the rich man suffered Lazarus for want of reliefe to perish at his gate Luk. 16. So the Priest and Levite passed by the man that had beene wounded of the theeves and was left for halfe dead and had no compassion of him Luk. 10. So the Wise-man saith in the Proverbs chap. 24.11 Deliver them that are drawne to death and wilt thou not preserve them that are led to bee slaine Isidore saith Qui incurrit in nudum esurientem c. He that meeteth with a man readie to perish for hunger and cold if he doe not give him meat and raiment homicida tenebitur shall be counted a murtherer So Gloss. interlinear A man committeth murther manu vel mente vel subtrahendo auxilium aut consilium c. with his hand with his heart and when he withdraweth his helpe and counsell 2. A man killeth by another two wayes consensu by giving consent as Saul did when Stephen was put to death keeping their garments that stoned him Act. 7.58 And the people crucified Christ calling unto Pilate Crucifie him Mandato voluntate By willing and commanding ones death as David did contrive Vrias death and Iezabel Naboths Bastingius QUEST XII Of the divers kinds of murder THere are divers kinds of killing 1. There is a lawfull killing or taking away of the life by the Magistrate as either in putting malefactors to death or in just warre where much bloud is shed 2. There is another kinde altogether unlawfull and inexcusable which is called wilfull murther when any of hatred smiteth a man that he die or of purpose lie in wait for him Numb 35.20 So Ioab wilfully killed Abner and Amasa 3. There is a third kinde of involuntarie murther when a man lieth not in wait but God offereth him unto him Exod. 21.13 For though such things seeme to us to fall out by chance yet all things are ordered and disposed by Gods providence and with him nothing happeneth by chance of this kinde there are three sorts 1. When two doe of a sudden having no purpose before fight together and the one killeth the other as striving upon the way or falling out upon any other sudden and unthought of occasion this is called manslaughter as Abner killed Asahel that met him and pursued him in battell this kinde is not so hainous as wilfull murther yet it far exceedeth these other kinds that follow 2. Sometime one is killed by chance which is of two sorts either a chance which falleth out by meere oversight and negligence as if a Physitian through carelesnesse mistake the medicine and so kill his patient which might by his care have beene prevented or it falleth out by meere chance which could not be helped as when one heweth wood and the axe-head flieth off and killeth one that standeth by 3. But that kinde which deserveth most favour and may best be excused is when one is forced to kill another se defendendo by defending of himselfe which was the womans case that with a milstone pashed out cruell Abimelechs braines when he attempted to set fire upon the tower and to burne the woman and all the rest of the people there Iudg. 9. QUEST XIII Magistrates are not guiltie of murder in putting malefactors to death ALl kinde of killing is not then unlawfull whereof there are three sorts there is divina vindicta heroica ordinata divine revenge heroicall ordinarie 1. The divine is which is directly and immediatly commanded by God as Abraham at the Lords bidding would have sacrificed his sonne Abraham non solum non est culpatus crudâ—litatis crimine sed laudatus est pietatis nomine Abraham was not onely 〈◊〉 blamed for his crueltie but commended for his pietie therein So Ioshua had commandement from the Lord to destroy the Canaanites 2. The heroicall kinde of killing is when any being inflamed with the zeale of Gods glorie and extraordinarily stirred by his spirit doe take revenge of the Lords enemies as Sampson upon the Philistims in his death Phineas in zeale killed the adulterer and adulteresse and Samuel hewed Agag the King of Amalek in peeces Marbach 3. The ordinarie killing is by the Magistrate who by direction of the word of God and according to wholesome lawes grounded upon the same doth give sentence of death against malefactors or wageth just battell upon these occasions the Magistrate sinneth not in shedding of bloud The reasons are these 1. Hierome saith Homicidas punire non est sanguinis effusio sed legis ministerium To punish murtherers and other malefactors it is no effusion of bloud but the execution of the law in Ieremiam c. 22. So Gloss. interlinear Index non occidit reum sed lex quae jubet The Judge killeth not the guiltie partie but the law which commandeth 2. Thomas saith Id quod licitum est Deo licitum est ministro ipsius per mandatum ejus That which is lawfull unto God the author of the law is lawfull unto Gods Minister by his Commandement But the Magistrate is Gods Minister Rom. 13.4 2. Places of Doctrine upon the sixth Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall contents of this Commandement THou shalt not kill This Commandement consisteth 1. Partly in prohibiting all kinde of hurt or wrong to our neighbour either in leaving or forsaking him or in doing him hurt either outwardly by murder rayling reviling or by any injurie whatsoever or inwardly by anger hatred desire of revenge 2. Partly in commanding the preservation of our neighbours life either in not hurting whether provoked or not provoked or in helping either by the depulsion of wrongs and injuries offred or by the collation of benefits 2. Doct. The particular vertues here commanded THe vertues then prescribed in this Commandement are of two sorts either such as doe not hurt or such as are beside helping also Of the first kinde are 1. A particular justice and equitie in all our acts and doings not to hurt or molest any in word or deed by violence fraud or negligence or by any other meanes such an one was Nathaniel a true Israelite in whom there
abominations Ierem. 7.9 Chrysostome well sayth to this purpose Non est locuâ— hic lupanar sed Ecclesia si membra meretricis habes abesto ab Ecclesia ne praesentiâ tuâ sordescat This place is no brothelhouse but the Church if thou hast the members of an harlot absent thy selfe from the Church lest it be defiled by thy presence c. homil 62. super loan 2. Obser. Against fornication ANd let not onely adulterers take heed unto themselves even fornication between those that are not married is a grievous offence before God who will not onely judge adulterers but whoremongers also Hebr. 13.4 And that saying of the Apostle may bee applied against fornication as well as adulteries Know yee not that yee are the Temple of God c. if any man destroy the Temple of God him shall God destroy 1 Cor. 3.16 Whereupon Augustine thus writeth Non vis corrumpi domum tuam quare corrumpi◠〈◊〉 Dei Thou wouldest not have thine house corrupted or defiled why then doest thou corrupt the house of God lib. dâ— in chord cap. 9. And these mischiefes fornication bringeth with it 1. Perdit animaâ— The fornicator destroyeth his owne soule Prov. 9.18 Hee knoweth not that the dead are there and that her guests are in the depth of hell 2. Consumit substantiam He consumeth and wasteth his substance Prov. 6.16 Because of the whorish woman a man is brought to a morsell of bread 3. Vilificat prolem It maketh their posteritie vile and base as the Apostle sheweth Otherwise were your children uncleane 1 Cor. 7.14 that is without mariage 4. Privat honore c. It depriveth of honour and purchaseth an everlasting blot Prov. 6.32 Hee shall find a wound and dishonour and his reproach shall never bee put away Thomas in opuscul 3. Obser. Against disguising of the bodie and uncomely apparell AVgustine sheweth how this Commandement is otherwise transgressed by light behaviour disordered apparell disguising of the bodie Habitus impudicus corporis est nuntius adulterini cordis The unshamefast behaviour of the bodie is the messenger of an adulterate heart Superflua inordinata capilatura vestimentorum muliebrium affectata similitudo as Superfluous and inordinate haire and affectation of womens garments c. And in women Fucatafacies capillorum nativi coloris adulteratio A painted face colouring of the haire imitating the fashion of mens garments c. August serm 347. The one S. Paul reproveth in men 1 Cor. 11.14 Doth not nature it selfe teach you that if a man have long haire it is a shame unto him The other S. Peter reprehendeth in women As their broydred haire and gold put about and the putting on of apparell 1 Pet. 3.3 The eighth Commandement 1 Questions discussed QUEST I. Whether the stealing of men only bee forbidden in this precept Vers. 15. THou shalt not steale R. Salomon is of opinion that only the stealing of men is prohibited here because that kinde of stealth onely was punished by death other kinds of theft by restitution either of double or quadruple Contra. 1. It doth evidently appeare that all kinde of theft and not that of men onely is here forbidden by these two reasons first because the Morall law only as grounded upon the law of nature did binde both Iewes and Gentiles the Judicials only concerned the Israelites therefore if other thefts had beene restrained only by the Judicials and not by the Morall law the Gentiles would not have condemned the stealing of goods as well as of men as they did Secondly the Judicials did only binde the people after they were delivered unto them not before but it was a sinne to steale in Israel even before they had received the Judicials 2. The ground of his opinion is not found that the breach of every morall law was punished by death for the coveting of a mans ox or asse though this coveting had proceeded to act was not judged worthie of death Tostat. qu. 24. QUEST II. Of the order and phrase used in this precept THou shalt not steale 1. Next unto those wrongs which either are done unto a mans single person as in offering violence to his life or in persona conjuncta in his coupled and conjoyned person namely his wife in committing adulterie next after follow those injuries which concerne his substance and such things as appertaine unto him Thomas in opuscul 2. And first of all prohibentur nocumenâ—a quae infertimiur facto those hinderances are forbidden which are done in fact then those quae inseruntur verbo which are done in word as in 9. precept Thou shalt not beare false witnesse Lyran. 3. But here this word theft is more generally taken quà m apud juriscâ—nsu tos than among the Lawyers Borrah for it signifieth quamlibet alienae rei usurpationem any kinde of usurping of that which is another mans Gloss. interlinear 4. And the reason why all violence fraud circumvention is prohibited under the name of theft is Furandi verbum posuit quod ut probrosâ—m omnibus naturaliter exhorrent He useth the word stealing which all men by nature doe abhorre is ignominious that we might the better be perswaded to abstaine from all kinde of theft Calvin For men cunningly doe glose and colour their vicious and corrupt dealing with honest names as fraud and deceit is called wit and cunning getting of other mens goods providence The Lord therefore to meet with all such daubing doth call things as they are and sheweth how that before him all such wrong-doers are held guiltie of theft QUEST III. Of the generall heads of the things here prohibited THree things in generall are forbidden in this Commandement 1. The unjust getting of other mens goods which is 1. Either by rapine or violence either of sacred things or of prophane and common 2. Or else by theft and pilfring 3. Or by deceit circumvention and fraud 2. All dammages discommoditie or hinderance which either is brought upon another by hatred evill will enmitie or else which is not turned aside and declined from our brother it being in our power 3. The abuse of mens goods and substance is likewise here condemned either in the evill bestowing and expending of them in vaine and unprofitable things or in the unjust holding and possessing and not imploying of them when necessitie requireth Simler QUEST IV. Of Sacrilege THe first generall transgression then is in sacrilege which is the stealing either of any sacred thing appointed for holy and sacred uses out of any place sacred or prophane or of any prophane and common thing out of a sacred place And this sacrilege is of two kinds it is either of things spirituall or of things externall and temporall of this latter sort are these 1. The wilfull stealing and withdrawing of such things as are ordained to holy and divine uses which kinde of sacrilege is strictly punished by humane lawes Such was the sinne of Achan in stealing the wedge of gold and the Babylonish garment which God had
of little Ashen or Eason in Essex in the house of a worshipfull Knight there dwelling The manner of it was this One Thomas Rugesby a servant of the house with another that was a Retainer and a youth about the age of thirteene yeeres did in the afternoone withdraw themselves into a private chamber taking with them strong Beere Aqua vita Rosa solis Tobacco and shut the doore close that they might be privat and take their fill of drinke without controlement who so excessively and immoderatly distempered themselves with drinke that they in most beastly manner vomited it up againe two of them the servant of the house and the youth were in vomiting strangled and were found dead in the morning the first sitting in his chaire the other lying upon the bed that which they cast up being by the cold of the night frozen to their mouths the third the Retainer was taken up in the morning wallowing up and downe in his vomit and in a manner halfe dead whom they had much adoe to recover This example would not bee forgotten but carefully bee laid up in remembrance that other excessive takers of drinke and wanton abusers of plentie which sinnes doe now every where overflow might receive warning thereby and judge themselves by repentance and leaving their sinne in time lest they be suddenly overtaken by Gods judgements in like manner 8. For stealing Achan may bee an example who for his theft and sacrilege was with throwing of stones put to death and that by the Lords extraordinarie direction in causing him to bee found by lot Ioshâ— 7. 2. For lying the fearefull examples of Ananias and Sapphira would be thought upon who were for that sinne striken with sudden death Act. 5. 10. For coveting of Sara Abrahams wife both Pharaoh King of Egypt and Abimelech King of Gerar were punished of God Gen. 12. and 20. though they were prevented of God and kept from committing adulterie Thus it pleaseth God to exemplifie some that others might take heed But here concerning the temporall judgements in this life these three observations are necessarie 1. That they which are temporally punished are not alwayes to be deemed the worst of all others though it please the Lord to make them examples to others as our blessed Saviour saith of the Galileans whose bloud Pilate mingled with their sacrifice and of those eighteene persons upon whom the tower of Siloam fell in Jerusalem that they were not greater sinners than the rest but except yee repent saith he yee shall all likewise perish 2. God neither punisheth all such offenders in this life for then men would expect no judgement to come neither doth he suffer all to go unpunished lest worldly men might be altogether secure and denie in their hearts the divine providence as the Prophet David saith Psal. 10.13 Wherefore doth the wicked contemne God he saith in his heart thou wilt not regard 3. That they which goe on still in their sinne without punishment should not flatter themselves for there remaineth a greater judgement behind and there is more hope of them which are chastised in this world So the Apostle saith Thou after thine hardnesse and heart that cannot repent heapest unto thy selfe wrath against the day of wrath and the declaration of the just judgement of God Rom. 2.5 The other kinde of judgement is in the next world as the Apostle sheweth 1 Cor. 6.9 Be not deceived neither fornicators nor Idolaters nor adulterers nor wantons nor buggerers nor theeves nor drunkards nor railers nor extortioners shall inherit the kingdome of God and such were some of you but yee are washed but ye are sanctified c. Adde hereunto the like sentence and declaration of Gods judgement upon the wicked Revelat. 21.8 But the fearefull and unbeleeving the abominable and murtherers whoremongers and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone which is the second death This so heavie a sentence there is no way to escape but in being washed from these sinnes by repentance sanctified by newnesse of life and justified by faith in Christ. And thus much of this treatise of the law which by Gods grace I have thus happily finished 3. Questions and doubts discussed out of the rest of this 20. Chapter QUEST I. In what sense the people are said to have seene the voyces which are properly heard and not seene Vers. 18. ANd all the people saw the thunders c. 1. Some thinke that by sight here is understood the hearing because it is usuall with the Hebrewes to take one sense for another Vatabl. But the sight is no more taken for hearing than to heare for the seeing 2. Ambrose referreth it to the understanding Interioris mentis videtur obtâ—tu It was seene by the inward sight of the minde like as our Saviour saith Hee that hath seene me hath seene my Father Iob. 14.9 Ambros. proâ—â—m in Luc. So also Hierome will have it like unto that saying of S. Iohn 1. epist. chap. 1.1 That which we have heard which we have seene with our eyes c. of the word of life Hierom. in Abdiam But seeing Moses speaketh of outward objects of the externall sense as of thunder lightning he meaneth also the sense unto the which such things are objected 3. Ferus thinketh that herein ostenditur oscitantia populi the carelesnesse of the people is shewed who more regarded that which they saw than the voyce which they heard and therefore they are said rather to see than heare But it seemeth that the people well regarded the voyce of God because presently after they desire that Moses might speake unto them and not the Lord any more 4. Procopius thinketh that it is said they saw because of the evidence thereof as if they had seene it with their eyes as it is said Amos 1.1 The words of Amos c. which hee saw c. Deus Prophetarum oculis res subjicit tanta evidentia ac si oculis cernerent c. God doth so evidently set things before the eyes of the Prophets that is their inward sight as though they saw them with their eyes But this was not done in vision as the Lord spake to his Prophets here was a sensible demonstration 5. Augustine therefore thinketh Videre hic poni pro generali sensu tam animi quam corporis That to see is here put for the generall sense both of the minde and bodie because Moses would speake compendiously so we use to say vide quid sonet see what soundeth so also is it taken for other senses as Christ saith to Thomas Because thou hast seene me thou beleevest whereas Thomas touched him Tract 121. super Ioann The reason hereof is Quia visus primatum obtinet in sensibus intermiscetur omnibus Because the sight is the chiefe among the senses it is as intermingled among them all Interlinear And Sensus visus plures rerum differentias nobis ostendit
to Moses but their Elders and the chiefe of them came in the name of the rest Deut. 5.23 Iun. QUEST V. Why the people desire that Moses would speake unto them Vers. 19. ANd said to Moses talke thou with us 1. Some doe here lay fault and blame upon the Israelites in refusing to heare the voice of God and chusing rather that Moses should speake unto them But the Lord commendeth them for so doing Deut. 5.28 They have well said all that they have spoken Therefore they thus spake not as preferring Moses voice before the Lords but because they were not able to heare the Lords voice being so terrible Tostat. quaest 37. 3. And the Lord terrified his people with his thundering voice for these two causes 1. That the people hereby should learne and be taught to feare the Lord. 2. And that they might be driven of themselves by this meanes to desire the ministery of Moses in speaking unto them for it was fit and requisite that as the Lord the Authour and founder of nature had by his owne mouth given such Lawes as were grounded upon nature such as were so evident even by the light of nature as that every one might at the first understand and acknowledge them so that the rest of the Lawes which were not so evident but needed explanation should be declared and rehearsed by Moses Sic Tostat. 4. Beside herein Moses was a type and figure of Christ who is the Mediator betweene God and us and by whom the will of God is revealed unto us Marbach Pelarg. 5. Moses herein formam boni aâ—ditoris describit c. describeth the forme of a good auditour who promiseth to heare and fulfill the precepts of their master Gloss. interlinear QUEST VI. Why the people are afraid they shall dye Vers. 19. LEt not God talke with us lest we dye Wee shall finde in Scripture that it was an usuall thing for men to feare that if they had seene God they should dye as Iacob counteth it a great benefit that he had seene God and yet lived Genes 32. So Gedeon and Manoah when they had seene God were afraid 1. Tostatus maketh this the cause of this feare that if they heard Gods voice any more they should dye because of the infirmity of the body which could not endure the Lords terrible voice for as the harmony of the body is dissolved by any excessive quality as with exceeding great heat or cold Ita excellens tolerabile vel terribile corrumpit potentiam tolerantem So an exceeding terrible or tolerable thing corrupteth and confoundeth the tolerating faculty Tostat. quast 38. But the cause of this feare is not so much in the body for Adam before his fall could endure the voice of God well enough 2. Some understand this of everlasting death Gloss. interlinear But it is evident that they meane the outward and corporall death which is contrary to this temporall life for thus the people say Deut. 5.24 Wee have seene this day that God doth talke with man and he liveth 3. Cajetanus doth gather these two reasons of this their feare both that terrible fire which they were afraid to come neere and the thundring voice of God which they could endure no longer to heare and these two reasons are expressed Deut. 5.25 Now therefore why should we dye for this great fire will consume us if wee heare the voice of the Lord our God any more we shall dye 4. But the greatest cause of this their feare was their sinne Conscius homo peccati c. metuit iram Dei c. Man being guilty to himselfe of sinne feareth the wrath of God Simler as Peter said to our blessed Saviour Luk. 5.8 Lord goe from me for I am a sinfull 〈◊〉 QUEST VII How the Lord is said to come unto them and why Vers. 20. GOd is come to prove you 1. God is said to come unto them not that he goeth from place to place but he came unto them by certaine effects his sinnes and wonders and two other wayes beside the Lord commeth by his word and by afflictions and crosses Simler 2. There are three ends of the Lords comming unto them 1. To trie them 2. That his feare may alway be among them 3. That they sinne not All these three arise one from the other probation and triall worketh feare and feare causeth to flee from sinne 3. So although Moses free them from one kinde of servile feare which was the feare of death and destruction yâ—â— he retaineth them still in that profitable kinde of feare whereby they might be kept in awe and obedience still Simler QUEST VIII How the Lord is said to tempt and prove his people Vers. 20. GOd is come to prove you 1. Deus metaphorice non proprie tentat c. God is not said properly but metaphorically â—o tempt as he is said to be angry Quiâ— facit effectum 〈◊〉 c. because he worketh the like effect as he which tempteth that is to cause the feare and obedience of the people to appeare Cajetan 2. God tempteth the Devill tempteth and man is said to tempt God is not said to prove or try for his owne knowledge and experience Cum omnia Deus videat priusquam 〈◊〉 seeing God knoweth all things before they are done Chrysost. hom 41. in Ioanu But God trieth and proveth Vt nos manifestemur aliis that we should be manifest to others as Abrahams obedience was made knowne to all in that he refused not to sacrifice his sonne vel nobis ipsis or to our selves as the Israelites were tempted in the wildernesse that it might be knowne what was in their heart Deut. 8.2 Tostat. Satan tempteth quia evertere â—ititur because he goeth about to supplant and overthrow us as hee tempted Iob. Home aliquando tentat ut probat aliquando ut rapiat Man sometime tempteth to prove sometime to catch as the Scribes and Pharisies tempted Christ to entangle him Ambros. in 2 Cor. 13. QUEST IX Why the people stood afarre off and where Vers. 21. SO the people stood afarre off 1. Cajetanus thinketh that the people returned not to their tents but stood a little from the mountaine and continued in the place whither they fled before vers 18. Tostat. 2. But it is evident Deut. 5.30 that they were bidden to goe unto their tents Iun. For as Moses went up neerer unto the presence of God so the people went still further backward unto their tents being so commanded of the Lord. 3. The mysticall signification hereof is that our sinnes doe make us stand aloofe off from God untill wee be reconciled by a Mediatour whereof Moses was a type and figure here Simler QUEST X. How Moses is said to draw neere to the darknesse BVt Moses drew neere unto the darknesse c. 1. Moses was in the darknesse before for all the hill was covered with smoake but he was not in that darknesse wherein the Lord was Vbi expressiora signa fiâ—â—ant quibus
that wise law-maker among the Athenians maketh no mention of paricide nor yet the Romans had any law against such untill the 642. yeare from the building of the Citie which was the 100. yeare before the nativitie of Christ one Publicius Malcolus with the helpe of his servants killed his mother against whom the Citie decreed this punishment that he should be put into a sacke together with a Cocke an Ape a Viper and a Dogge and so cast into the water Tostat. quaest 17. The Egyptians caused such first to be beaten with thornes and then to be burnt with thornes The Macedonians did stone them to death Pelarg. Plato lib. 9. de legibus would have such grievously punished unto death and then to be left unburied 2. It is a like sinne to kill the father as to doe it to the mother yet the father is set before as the more honourable person and fewer examples are extant of those that have killed their fathers than of the other Oedipus is said unwittingly to have killed his father Laius King of Thebes taking him for his enemie But Orestes killed his mother Cliteâ—nestra Agamemnons wife wittingly so did Alcmeon his mother being charged so to doe by his father Amphiaraus being slaine in the Thebane warre to the which his wife perswaded him to goe and therefore being deadly wounded he commanded his sonne to kill her Ninia likewise the sonne of Ninus killed his mother Semiramis after he had carnally knowne her Such beastly examples of paricide Heathen histories afford who not knowing God were without naturall affection and disobedient to parents which were the sinnes of the Heathen Rom. 1.30 Some write that Iudas killed his father and married his mother Tostat. qu. 17. But it is not like that if Iudas had so apparently shewed his wickednesse before that our blessed Saviour would have chosen him to be one of his Apostles QUEST XLV The law of man-stealing expounded Vers. 16. HE that stealeth a man and selleth him or it be found with him c. 1. Some understand if it be found with the buyer that is the man that is stollen be found sold over and delivered to the buyer Oleaster But then there should be a repetition of the same thing for as much was said before and selleth him there cannot be a seller without a buyer 2. Some doe thus expound if it be found that is proved by him that he hath stolen a man So Lyran. Tostat. Vatab Simler and the Latine text expresseth the same sense convictus noxae if he be convicted of the offence But this clause had beene superfluous for this must be understood in all lawes that the offence must be sufficiently proved before it be censured Againe in this sense the law should be imperfect not determining what should become of him that had stolen a man onely and not sold him some say restitution should be made by the like he should give two men for one or give the price of two men But this is no where to be found restitution indeed was to be made in the theft of other things Exod. 22.1 but there was not the like reason for men 3. Therefore the meaning is this that if one steale a man whether he have sold him and delivered him over or if he be found with him as yet unsold in both cases he should suffer death for his malice appeared evidently in the stealing onely that he intended to sell him over Iun. Gallas Osiand So also Lippom. he was to be put to death if the theft were yet found with him propter crudelissimum institutum for his cruell enterprise how much more si desperata fuerit venditi redemptio if being sold he were past redemption 4. By the ancient Romane lawes such men-stealers were condemned to the metal mines by a latter law of Constantine they were to be cast unto the wilde beasts Simler QUEST XLVI The reason why man-stealing was punished by death THe reasons why this kinde of theft in stealing of men was so severely punished with death were these 1. Because man was created according to Gods image therefore in respect of the excellencie and preeminence of the thing that was stolen the punishment ought to be the greater 2. Because by this meanes he that was sold lost his libertie which is as precious as life it selfe and to bring a man into servitude quid aliud quà m sexcentis eum mortibus objicere what was it else than to expose him to an hundred deaths Gallas 3. And beside they could not steale men and sell them to the Israelites but it would bee knowne and therefore it is like that after they had stolen them they sold them over to the Gentiles and so they were in danger that were so sold over to be corrupted in religion and seduced to idolatrie and so drawne away from the service of God and by this meanes be brought into bondage both in soule and bodie Simler The Interlinearie Glosse therefore thus expoundeth diabolo obnoxium fâ—cerit hath sold him that is brought him into the devils service 4. Of this sinne were Iosephs brethren guiltie in selling him over to the idolatrous Egyptians who therein had a vaine perswasion that they were not guiltie of his bloud because they spared his life but in selling him over to bee a slave and that to an idolatrous people as much as in them lay eum è medio sustulerunt they tooke him away as out of the world Gallasius QUEST XLVII What kinde of cursing of parents is here understood Vers. 17. HE that curseth his father or mother c. 1. There are two kinds of cursing one assumpto Dei nomine when Gods name is taken in vaine withall another is without Borrhaius Lippoman thinketh that this is understood of the first kinde But seeing the blaspheming of the name of God deserved death of it selfe Levit. 24. and this law doth properly punish the cursing and blaspheming of the parents it seemeth generally to be intended against all kinde of cursing and wiâ—hing evill unto the parents 2. And it seemeth to be understood of an use and custome of cursing not of every railing word which sometime should bee uttered by the childe in rage and heat for every such word to inflict death upon the childe would be thought too hard sed ille qui assuefactus est maledicere patri maetri c. but he that is accustomed to curse his father and mother and that for small matters deserveth death Tostat. as that law against disobedient children Deut. 21.18 is made against those that are incorrigible and are confirmed in their disobedience and stubbornnesse So also Cajetane As he that smiteth them is worthie of death so he that curseth nisi imperfectio actus excuset puta si non deliberato aut leve verbum c. unlesse the imperfection of the act excuse or he speake a light word of railing c. 3. And as cursing to the face of the parents is judged worthie
of death so also publike backbiting and detracting Publice enim detrahens perinde est ac si palam detraheret For he that openly backbiteth his parents is as if he did it to their face but it is otherwise in private backbiting and speaking evill of them for detractor reveretur eum cui detrahit c. the privie detractor doth feare and reverence him whom he speaketh evill of but he that curseth to the face is impudent and shamelesse c. QUEST XLVIII What manner of strife the law meaneth Vers. 18. WHen men strive together 1. As contention is in words so rixa strife properly is in deeds cum ex rixa invicem se percutiunt when striving they fall to blowes Thom. 2. The case is put of men but if either a woman should strike a man and wound him or one woman should hurt another they are subject to the same law Tostat. qu. 19. 3. And this law must be understood of those which strive and fight one with another each offending the other not when one defendeth himselfe one cannot offend another without mortall and grievous sinne but one may defend himselfe without sinne and yet notwithstanding he may sinne sometime more sometime lesse in defending himselfe if he onely seeke in his owne defence to repell the wrong that is offered it is no sinne si cum animo vindictae odii c. If with a minde of revenge and hatred he defend himselfe he sinneth either lesse when he findeth his anger kindled and his patience violated or more when he bindeth himselfe wholly to bee revenged Sic Thom. 2.2 qu. 41. art 1. 4. By smiting with stone or fist is understood all kinde of assaulting one either afarre off with stone arrow dart or such like or neere hand as with sword staffe in the hand Simler or all kinde of hurting either with weapon or instrument or without Tostat. 5. And the law meaneth such hurting where no member was perished for in that case they were to give eye for eye hand for hand foot for foot vers 24. Simler QUEST XLIX What punishment the smiter had if he which were smitten died Vers. 19. IF he rise againe c. then shall he that smote him goe quit 1. That is he shall be freed from the sentence of death though he be not innocent before God nor yet altogether free from all civill punishment for in this case he is to allow his charges for his resting and to pay for his healing 2. But here the doubt is what punishment he should have that in striving so smote his brother that he died of it Cajetane thinketh that in this case he should flie unto one of the Cities of refuge Quia non ex intentione sed ex repentina rixa percussio facta est Because the blow or stroke was given not of purpose but occasioned by a sudden brawle c. But if it had beene so as if death had followed upon such smiting the smiter should goe free so neither death not following but some other hurt that he is constrained to keepe his bed should he have beene taxed so much as with the charges if the taking away of the life in this case had not beene punishable much lesse any lesse hurt being not mortall 3. Therefore I preferre here the judgement of Tostatus that if he which was thus smitten in a fray or brawle died he that smote him was to die whether hee were Hebrew that was so killed or stranger whether bond or free for it was not lawfull for them to kill a Gentile or stranger sojourning among them and if a free man killed a free man or a servant a free man he was to die without all question and if a free man killed anothers servant hee was to die also for if a master killed his owne servant outright he was punished by death vers 20. much more if he killed anothers servant Tostat. quast 19. And that in this case they which in strife killed one another deserved to die it is evident both by the generall law before vers 12. He that smiteth a man that he die shall die the death and by a necessarie consequence here If he rise againe that is smitten and walke he that smote him shall goe quit that is from the punishment of death it followeth then if he doe not rise againe but die that he shall not goe quit QUEST L. What should become of the smiter if the other died after he walked upon his staffe Vers. 19. ANd walke without upon his staffe But what if he die after he hath risen and walked upon his staffe 1. R. Salomon thinketh that the smiter was to bee apprehended and kept till he that was smitten were perfectly recovered and if he did not the other was to die and by walking upon the staffe he saith is meant the perfect recovery of his health as Ezech. 4. the staffe of bread is taken for the vertue and fulnesse of bread by a metaphor But though such metaphoricall speeches are usuall in the Prophets yet in the setting downe of lawes words must be taken in their literall sense Tostat. 2. Therefore because the law saith If he walke without or abroad upon his staffe the other shall goe quit the meaning is though he lie downe upon his bed againe and afterward die yet the other shall goe quiâ— and the reason is because after hee sitteth up and walketh and seemeth to be past the danger and falleth downe againe Magis probabile est quod mortuus est â—x negligentia c. It is more probable that he died by his owne negligence and carelesnesse in keeping of himselfe or by some other occasion than of the smiting Lyran. 3. But if he did not rise at all from his bed and being risen walked but a little about the house upon his staffe and come not abroad and afterward died then the other should not goe quit Tostat. qu. 20. QUEST LI. Of the equetie of this law in bearing of the charges Vers. 19 HE shall beare his charges for his resting and pay for his healing c. 1. That is he shall pay all manner of charges which he was put unto about his healing as to the Physitians and for the physicke and medicines which he used and for his diet which upon this occasion was extraordinary and so more chargeable Tostat. qu. 22. Likewise he was to beare the charges of the ministers and keepers that attended upon him during the time of his lying Simler 2. The intendment of this law is that full recompence and satisfaction should be made for any dammage or losse which happened unto another and yet so as that such recompence being made the Lord would have one to forgive another that charitie should not be violated nor any grudge or purpose of revenge remaine Oleaster 3. This law was more equall indifferent than that law of the Romans contained in the 12. tables that if any man did beat and batter another he should
woman with child or shee be behind him and he knew it not and hee hurteth her with his heele that she die in this case the man deserved no punishment at all no not so much as a pecuniary mulct to be inflicted which yet is appointed by this law where death followeth not therefore this law meaneth not any such act which is altogether involuntarie Tostat. quaest 24. 2. Neither is this law to be understood of murther altogether voluntarie as if a man of purpose should smite a woman with child and shee die for this was provided for before what punishment should be laid upon him that committed wilfull murther 3. This law therefore is made concerning such violent acts as were of a mixt kinde partly voluntarie partly involuntarie as if a man striving with one and seeing a woman with child within the danger cared not whether shee was hurt or no Tostat. Or if striving with a man he thrust him upon a woman with child Galas Or a woman comming to rescue her husband receiveth hurt by the other that striveth Lyran. In this case if death followed in the woman with child the 〈…〉 to die foâ— it 4. And the reasons are these 1. Because adfuit laedendi animuâ— he that so striveth had a minde and intent to hurt Simler Consilii ratio habenda est his counsell and intention must be considered which was to assault the life of another and by this occasion he killeth one whom he intended not to hurt Iunius Piscator 2. Againe Vxor una carâ— est cum viâ—o quem intendeâ—â— pâ—râ—utere The wife is one flesh with her husband whom he intended to smite Lyran. 3. And beside instance is given of a woman with child who neither could shift for her selfe and a double danger is brought both upon her her child which she went with therefore in this case the law provideth that such oversights should be severely punished Tostat. q. 25. QUEST LVI Whether the death of the infant be punished as well as of the mother Vers. 22. ANd death follow not c. 1. Some thinke that this is to be understood onely of the death of the woman and not of the child Osiander That if the child died and not the woman he was onely to pay a peece of money not to lose his life for it and their reason is because he deserved not so great a punishment that killed an infant in the wombe as he that did stay a perfect man Oleaster who findeth fault with Cajetane for understanding the law indifferently of the woman and her child 2. But Cajetanâ— opinion is to be preferred for like as it is a more heinous thing to kill a man in his owne house than in the way so is it a prodigious thing to suffocate an infant in the mothers wombe qui nondum est in lucem editus which is not yet brought forth into the light of this world Calvin And againe Foetus quamvis in utero inclusus homo est The infant though yet inclosed in the wombe is a man Simler And the child in the wombe is yet a part of the person of the woman so that if there be corruptioâ—â—tius perâ—oâ—a aut partis a destruction of the whole person or of a part Iun. he that so hurteth a woman with child in her owne person or her childs is subject to this law QUEST LVII Whether this law extendeth it selfe to infants which miscarie being not yet perfectly formed NOw it being agreed that this law as well comprehendeth the infant that perisheth as the woman that beareth it yet there remaineth a question whether if the childe in the wombe bee yet imperfect and so not endued with sense and life that in this case though the woman die not but onely lose her birth he that did the hurt is to suffer death 1. Some hold the affirmative that if any child whatsoever by this meanes miscarrie the offender is subject to this law 〈…〉 propâ—â—qua est effectui The iâ—fant being now formed is so neere unto the effect thâ—â— is the life that who causeth the same to miscarrie may be said to have killed a man Gallas And therefore by the Civill law he that of purpose procured the birth to miscarrie if he were a meane person was condemned to the metall mines if a noble person to banishment Cicero also in his oration pro Cluentiâ— reporteth of one Milesia a woman who being hired of the heires in reversion to destroy the infant that shee went with had a capitall puishment therefore inflicted upon her Ex Simlero But these lawes were made against such as did of purpose seeke to destroy infants in the wombe and cause abortion of them here the cause is divers where the fruit of the wombe miscarrieth by some chance 2. Therefore this penaltie was onely by the law inflicted when as the infant perished that was endued with life So Augustine thinketh using this reason Nondum potest dici anima viva in eo corpore quod sensu caret c. The living soule cannot be said to be yet in that bodie which wanteth sense qu. 80. in Exod. And thus the Septuagint interpret If the infant came forth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not yet formed c. which forming of the infant beginneth fortie dayes after the conception as Procopius Cajetane giveth this reason why in such a case when the birth commeth forth imperfect the sentence of death is not inflicted quia homo in potentia non est homo because a man onely in possibilitie is not a man quia tunc non occiditur homo non est homicidium and because then a man is not killed it is no manslaughter Tostat. And the word jeladim sons signifieth as much that the law meaneth formed and perfect infants Simler And it is put in the plurall because a woman may have more infants than one in her wombe at once for otherwise why should one give life for life or soule for soule seeing such imperfect births are not yet endued with life soule As Augustine saith In Adam exemplum datum est c. An evident example is given in Adam quia jam formatum corpus accipit animam that the bodie when it is now fashioned receiveth the soule and not before For after Adams bodie was made the Lord breathed into him the breath of life So August lib. quaest vet nov Testam qu. 23. as he is alleaged Caus. 32. qu. 2. cap. 9. QUEST LVIII Why the action is given unto the husband Vers. 22. ACcording as the womans husband shall appoint him c. 1. Because the injurie is done unto the man in that his issue is cut off and because hee is the head of the woman the law referreth the prosecution of this wrong unto the husband Tostat. 2. But the taxation of the mulct is so referred to the man as yet if he should exceed a just proportion the Judges in their discretion are to moderate it Gallas 3. Tostatus
and 〈◊〉 2. And beside the facility easinesse and readinesse of theft other things are to be respected as the worth and price of the thing stollen and the boldnesse and impudency of the theefe 6. Wherefore these reasons rather may be yeelded 1. Quia frequâ—ntius furtâ— subtraâ—ebantur 〈◊〉 It might be that it was a more frequent and usuall thing to steale oxen among the Hebrewes than sheepes and therefore God would restraine the more usuall theft by the greater punishment Tostat. 2. In hâ—c dominium majus â—adacia major In this theft of oxen the losse was greater to the owner when his exe was stollen and the boldnesse of the theefe greater 〈…〉 esse Such a theefe as should steale oxen had need be bold and cunning because such a theft cannot so easily be hid as of sheepe 3. Ab. Ezra also giveth this reason because when a sheepe is stollen the owner loseth but his sheepe but in the other theft 〈…〉 he loseth his oxe and the labour of his oxe this reason also is approved by Oleaster 〈◊〉 Gallasâ—â—â— But Tostatus taketh this exception that iâ— the losse of the oxeus labour â—e accounted here in the restitution of five-fold why should it not be respected as well when the thing stollen is found with the theefe in which â—ase he was to pay but two-fold qu. 2. The answer here is ready because where the oxe is found though thâ—â—e â—e an intermission of his labour yet there is hope of restitution againe so is there not here the oxe being killed or sold. 7. Iosephus thinketh that this Law extendeth it selfe also to other cattell in the fields as to goats as well as sheepe though they be not here 〈◊〉 But concerning the asse or horse because they are not so easily stollen being kept in the house Tostatus thinketh that the Law of two-fold restitution tooke place as in the stealing of houshold stuffe and other moveable goods But it is more like recording to the rule observed before in other Lawes that by one kinde the rest are understood and these two the oxe and sheepe are given â—n â—ssistance as the most usuall and common beasts unto which all other great and small cattell should be reduced as afterward vers 4. direct mention is made of the asse QUEST III. Of the divers punishment of theft and whether it may be capitall NOw concerning the punishment of theft 1. The licentious liberty of the Lacedemonians is much to be misliked who punished not theft at all because they thought it was a meanes to traine and exercise their people in the practice of warre Gallas for it being a Morall law Thou shalt not steale and so grounded upon the Law of nature it ought not by any contrary custome to be discontinued 2. Neither is that Law of Solâ—â— which the Romans also inserted into their twelve Tables to be altogether approved aâ—â—â—ing opposite to Moses Law for they punished manifest theft with foure-fold when the theefe was taken in the manner whereas Moses setteth it but at two-fold and theft not manifest when the theefe is not found with the thing that was stollen they censured with restitution of two-fold whereas Moses chargeth such offence with foure-fold because such an one as hath sold or killed the stollen good hath added sinne to sinne having no purpose of restitution nor there being any possibility thereof Herein therefore the Law of Moses is more equall than the other 3. The Law also of Draco is too severe which punished theft with death the Scythians did so also but they had some reason for it because they had no houses or places of defence for their cattell so that if theft among them had not beene most severely punished nothing could have beene safe 4. Nor yet am I of their opinion that thinke that lex Mosis non pertinet ad politiam nostram the Law of Moses doth not at all belong to the policie of Common-wealths now Lippom. Non sumus alligati ad leges Iudaicas forenses That we are not bound how to the Jewes Civill lawes at all Osiand but that Magistrates may increase the externall punishment whether by death or otherwise as the circumstance of time quality and condition of the people require Contra. 1. As we are not strictly tied in every point to Moses Judicials so yet the equity thereof remaineth still which chiefly consisteth in this in the due measuring and weighing of the nature of sinnes which are thought to be worthy of death 2. Punishments externall may be increased which concerned either pecuniary mulcts or other bodily chastisement not touching the life as Moses punished theft with foure-fold but afterward the sinne increasing it was set at seven-fold Prov. 7.31 Pelarg. 3. But whereas mans life is only at Gods disposition this may be safely affirmed that no humane Law can take away the life of man for any offence without either generall or particular warrant and direction from Gods Law as is more at large before declared p. 4 5. 5. And yet I cannot consent to those that thinke no theft at all ought to be punished by death for even by Moses Law a violent theft as in breaking up of an house was judged worthy of death it was lawfull to kill such a theefe vers 2. Againe sacrilegious theft was likewise punished in the same manner as Iakob giveth sentence that they should not live that had stollen Labans gods Gen. 31.32 So Achan was put to death for stealing the excommunicate thing Iosh. 7. Theft committed of wantonnesse and without mercie David adjudgeth unto death 2 Sam. 12. vers 6. Chrysostome thinketh that David legem est praetergressus exceeded the Law in that he commandeth beside the restitution of foure-fold the man to be slaine and he calleth it supereffluentem justitiam overabounding justice But the Law of God did beare out David in it for he which did sinne presumptuously and with an high hand that is of malice and obstinacie was to dye for it Numb 15.30 Such was the sinne of the rich man whose case there is propounded which having many sheepe himselfe tooke away the poore mans sheepe by violence and had no pity Further he that did steale a man was to dye for it by the Law of Moses vers 16. So that it is evident even by Moses Judiciall lawes that some kinde of theft deserved death By the Romane Lawes also as is extant in their 12. Tables servants convicted of manifest theft were first beaten and then cast downe headlong from the rocke By the Imperiall lawes a theefe for the first offence was whipped then if he offended againe he lost his eares and the third time he was hanged in Anithent ut nulli Iudici c. for now such a theefe sinneth of obstinacie and malice and contempt against the Lawes and Magistrate and may by the Law of God be worthily put to death Simler So likewise such thefts whereby the publike peace and safety is violated as in the Campe
with these abominations for the which the Lord cast them out Levit. 18.24 Simler QUEST XXXV What is meant by sacrificing to other gods 〈…〉 hearing that the two tribes and an halfe beyond Jordan had erected them an Altar they assembled themselves together against them as jealous lest they purposed to bring in a new worship of God Tostat. 5. And not onely they which committed Idolatrie themselves but they which perswaded others were to be put to death Deut. 13.6 7. QUEST XXXVI Whether Idolatrie now is to be punished by death Vers. 20. SHall be slaine 1. The word is charam that simply signifieth not to cut off but to destroy as an anathema thing accursed and bequeathed to destruction Iun. Pelarg. 2. The Interlinearie Glosse expoundeth it of excommunication and of eternall death but both the practise of those times and the like punishment here â—nflicted upon other capitall crimes sheweth that it must be understood of the losse of the temporall life though beside without their great repentance Idolaters deserve also everlasting death Rev. 22.8 3. Some object that now Idolatrie is not to be punished by death but that such rather that are seduced should be instructed in the true worship of God and in the times of the Gospell it is fit more clemencie and mercie should be shewed than under the rigour of the law Answ. 1. Though Idolaters are to be instructed to reforme their error for the salvation of their soules yet this letteth not but that for so great impietie and for the example of others they should worthily suffer the paines of death 2. And now under the Gospel seeing robberie against the common peace and â—reason against the life and safetie of the Prince and State are judged worthy of death Qui majestatem Dei 〈◊〉 dissime violavit tam leve facinus admisisse putabitur shall he which violateth the Majestie of God most impiously be thought to commit so small an offence Gallas 4. But although as Osiander saith the Magistrate non gladio in idololatriam vindicare teneatur be not now bound to take revenge of Idolatrie by the sword for some difference there is betweene Pagane idolatrie and Popish superstitious Imagerie the one being an absolute deniall of all Christianitie the other a mixing therewith of superstitious vanitie yet by the equitie of this Judiciall law which serveth for the strengthening of a morall precept the like sin of idolatrie may justly receive the like punishment As Cyprian repeating that law Deut. 13.12 Si audieris in una ex civitatibus c. If thou hearest of any of the cities c. that are drawne away to serve other gods that such a city should be destroyed thus further inferreth cujus praecepti memor Mattathias which precept Mattathias remembring killed him that approached to the idolatrous Altar to sacrifice c. Then he further addeth Quod si ante adventum Christi circa Deum colendum et idola spernendâ— haec pracepta servata sunt c. Now if these precepts concerning the worship of God and despising of Idols were kept before the comming of Christ quanto magis post adventum Christi servanda sunt How much more ought they to be kept after the comming of Christ seeing he hath not onely exhorted us in words but in deeds Augustine likewise shewing a difference betweene the schisme of the Donatists and Pagane idolatrie thus concludeth Quis vestrum non laudat leges c. Which of you doth not commend the lawes given by the Emperours against the sacrifices of the Pagans illius quippe impietatis capitale supplicium est c. for the punishment of that impietie is capitall 5. R. Salomon thinketh that if a Jew did sweep an Idol Temple velornaret vel alia similia faceret quae sunt praambula c. or adorne it onely and doe other things which are but preambles to Idolatrie he was not to be punished by death but some other wayes Ex Lyrano But if enticing in words to idolatrie were judged worthy of death Deut. 17.5 much more to entice and draw by fact and example as in adorning and beautifying the Temples of Idols QUEST XXXVII Why idolatrie is judged worthy of death NOw the reasons why idolatry was held by Moses law to be worthy of death were these 1. Quia is cultus diabolo exhibetur qui idolorum author est Because that idolatrous worship is giuen unto the devill who is the author of Idols Gallas 2. Aequum est vita privari eos c. It is just that they should be deprived of life which forsake God the author and fountaine of life Simler To leave the worship of God who is the author of life and to worship the devill the author of death and destruction mille mortibus c doth shew himselfe to be worthy of a thousand deaths Gallas 3. Though euery transgression of the law be in some sort a breach of Gods covenant yet idolatry more specially is said to be a transgression of the covenant of God Deut. 17.2 Because men apparently and professedly thereby forsake the profession solemnely made of their service and obedience vnto the Lord Simler 4. And this severe punishment the Lord appointeth for idolatrie quia inter Aegyptios idololatria assiâ—everant because the Israelites had accustomed themselves unto idolatry among the Egyptians in so much that they Moses yet living set up a golden calfe to worship Simler 5. Because of the ready inclination and propension of mans nature unto idolatry it was fit that it should by some severe punishment be restrained Calvin 6. And two things there are which doe exaggerate the nature of a sinne and aggravate the punishment thereof Res in quibâ—s committitur is in quos committitur c. The things wherein they are commited and they against whom they are committed Borrh. Both which concurre here in the sinne of apostasie and idolatrie For what mattâ—â— can be of greater moment than the service and worship of God and what sin more grievous than that which is committed against God QUEST XXXVIII Of kindnesse how to be shewed toward strangers and why Vers. 21. THou shalt not doe injury to a stranger 1. There are two reasone why men are apt to doe wrong unto strangers a both because they are not allied by affinity or consanguinity and therefore no naturall affection is commonly shewed toward them because they are destitute of friends and patrons and therefore lye more open to wrong Tostatus 2. The stranger must neither bee injured in word nor wronged in deed Simler Neither secretly by fraud nor openly by violence neither must they be hindred by any private man nor publikely prejudiced by lawes made against them Tostat. And it is not enough not to doe them wrong but we must help them and doe them what good we can Gallas 3. And this reason is added because they were strangers in Egypt they did feele by experience what it was to use strangers hardly that by
consecration Vers. 35 THou shalt do thus unto Aaron and to his sonnes c. 1. Some are of opinion that all things here prescribed to bee observed and done were de necessitate consecrationis of the necessitie of the consecration and if any thing were omitted the consecration was voide R. Salomon Lyranus But this is not like that if any thing were neglected in the manner of eating in respect of the place persons or time that their consecration should thereby have been void as Levit 10.17 Aaron being in griefe for the sudden death of Nadab and Abihu forgot the sinne offering which they should have eaten and suffered it to be all burnt and this was the eighth day after their consecration Levit. 9.2 when as yet the anointing was fresh upon them and they did not yet come forth of the doores of the Tabernacle Levit. 10.7 And yet notwithstanding this negligence there was no nullitie of Aarons consecration Tostat. quâ—st 18. 2. Therefore Tostatus opinion is rather to be received that some things were of necessitie in the consecration as the washing anointing of the Priests the putting on of the priestly apparell the sprinkling of themselves and their garments some things were only de solennitate belonging to the solemnitie of the consecration as the seething and eating of it in the holy place and eating it the same day it was a sin to omit any of these but thereby their consecration was not made voide QUEST XLI Why the consecration of the Priests continued seven daies Vers. 35. SEven daies shalt thou consecrate them c. 1. This consecration of the Priests was to continue seven daies together that both the Priests hereby might bee confirmed in their vocation and be assured thereof that they were thereunto appointed of God and that the people also might thereby take better notice that they were set apart by the Lord for that holy function Osiander 2. And further hereby thus much was signified that as the Priests seven daies together were consecrated so we per totum vitae curriculum throughout the whole course of our life should be consecrated and addicted to Gods service Simler Marbach 3. Likewise we are hereby admonished Pontificem continuo proficere non posse repente summum fieri c. that the Priest must daily increase and go forward that he cannot be made perfect at once that many gifts and graces are required in him Lippoman 4. It also sheweth that as their consecration was not perfect before the seventh day so we cannot attaine to perfection in this life Osiander QUEST XLII Whether all the sacrifices of the first day were iterated seven daies together or the sacrifice for sin only Vers. 36. ANd shalt offer everie day a calfe 1. Lyranus thinketh that not onely a calfe for a sinne offering was sacrificed everie day but two rammes also so that seven calves were offered and fourteene rammes in these seven daies So also Simler Borrh. Lippom. Pellican But seeing there is no mention made but only of the sinne offering we have no warrant to imagine any other sacrifice to have been iterated but that as belonging to their consecration 2. Iosephus thinketh yet more that all things were iterated every day which were done upon the first day as the anointing of them and the sprinkling of the Priests themselves and their garments But this is not like that their consecration was iterated it was sufficient for them once to be consecrated and seeing the ramme of consecration was killed onely upon the first day with the bloud whereof they were sprinkled they were so sprinkled but upon the first day 3. Tostatus his opinion is that the calfe which was the sacrifice for sinne and the consecration ramme were offered everie day expresse mention is made of the one and the other is implied in these words seven daies shalt thou fill their hands that is put into their hands part of the peace offering to be shaken to fro before the Lord as is prescribed vers 24. Now the ramme of burnt offering needed not to be daily offered during these seven dayes because there were every day morning and evening a lambe offered for a burnt sacrifice Sic Tostat. But this opinion cannot stand 1. Seeing Moses is bid to take two rams chap. 24.2 it is like that either both of them were â—â—nued every day or none 2. And the filling of their hands signifieth nothing else but the consecrating of their Ministery as is before shewed whereof the hand was the organe and instrument it is not literally to be pressed to signifie the putting of the things offered into their hands 4. Therefore according to the words of the text of all the sacrifices appointed for the first day onely the calfe which is the sinne offering is prescribed to be iterated and the reason is because it was to cleanse and purifie the Altar Levit. 8.15 But only in this sacrifice were the hornes of the Altar touched with bloud and so sanctified which was not done in any of the other sacrifices QUEST XLIII To what end the sinne offering was offered every day of the seven Vers. 36. THou shalt offer every day a calfe c. for reconciliation or to make atonement 1. This reconciliation was not only made for the sinne of the Priests as thinketh Tostatus for the hornes of the Altar were laid on with this bloud whereby it was purified Levit. 8.15 2. Neither yet was this sinne offering prescribed only ad expiandum Altare to cleanse the Altar as thinketh Osiander Calvin For he had said before seven dayes shalt thou consecrate them that is the Priests and then it followeth and shalt offer every day c. so that this daily offering for the space of seven dayes belonged unto the consecration of the Priests 3. Therefore the end of this sacrifice for sinne was both to make atonement for Aaron and his sonnes as also to purifie and cleanse the Altar Iunius QUEST XLIV How the Altar was cleansed and why Vers. 36. ANd thou shalt cleanse the Altar 1. After the consecration of the Priests is set forth their Ministery and service both at the Altar of burnt offering and in the golden altar in the next Chapter Here three things are declared concerning the Altar of burnt offering 1. How it should bee purified 2. What should bee offered thereon 3. The profit and benefit that should come thereby the Lord would there come unto them and speake with them vers 42. and dwell among them vers 45. Lyranus 2. Two things are required to the purifying of the Altar it must first be cleansed not that it was polluted of it selfe but to shew that in respect of man omnia corruptione naturae profana ob peccatum c. that all things by the corruption of our nature are profane because of sinne Gallas Marbach As also it was not only cleansed but sanctified and set apart for holy uses that it should not be lawfull to offer their sacrifices elsewhere
done upon that day he materially breaketh it who doth a worke like unto that which is forbidden but yet is permitted by the law As if there were a law that no citizen should sell any thing to a stranger but such as were licensed to do it hee that so selleth being not allowed transgresseth the law formally he that doth it being thereunto licensed doth transgresse onely materially in that he doth the same thing which he committeth that transgresseth the law but not in that manner The same difference there was betweene the workes of the Priests which were allowed by the law upon the Sabbath day and the like workes of those which laboured in the building of the Tabernacle upon that day which were forbidden 3. Another difference is this the sacrifices belonged to the service of God which if they should have been intermitted upon the Sabbath the service of God should therby have been neglected But though the workes about the Tabernacle did cease upon the Sabbath Gods worship was not thereby neglected for they might as well be made upon other daies and so were 4. They were to do no servile works upon the Sabbath but many works necessarie for the building of the Sanctuarie were servile so were not the sacrifices and other duties performed by the Priests upon the Sabbath therefore the one were permitted upon the Sabbath and not the other Tostat. qu. 9. QUEST XIII How the Sabbath is said to bee a signe that the Lord did sanctifie them Vers. 13. IT is a signe betweene me and you that I the Lord do sanctifie you Which words are diversly expounded 1. Some make this the sense It is a signe that I sanctifie you in that I have separated you from other people selected you unto my self Vatab. Lyran. 2. Oleaster thus Sanctitas Sabbatâ— signum est munditia c. The holinesse of the Sabbath is a signe of cleanenesse which I require of you Vt ex dicato tempore Deo credamus magis nos ipsos dicuri Deo c. That by the time dedicated to God wee should know that wee our selves much more should be dedicated Cajetan But more is here signified than so the words implie an actuall sanctification not signified onely 3. Hierom saith it is so said because it was signum veri Sabbati a signe of the true Sabbath wherein wee shall rest from the labours of the world 4. So also Irenam Non sine symbole erant signa the signes were not without some symbole and signification Sabbatâ— perseverantiam totim diâ—i c. The Sabbaths holding our the whole day did signifie our continuance in Gods serâ—â—ce But here the Lord speaketh of an actuall sanctification not of a typicall signification 5. Some say it is so called quia signum erat â—udâ—ris because it was a signe of the Covenant whereby the people did bind themselves to worship the Lord for their God and such signes were all the other ceremonies Marbach But there is a morall consideration in the sanctifying of the Sabbath therefore it was otherwise a signe than the other ceremonies 6. It was then a common signe betweene God and them they holding God to be their God Creator and sanctifier because the Sabbath was a commemoration of the creation and the Lord taking them for his people whom he created redeemed and sanctified Iun. Tostat. 7. Beside the keeping of the Sabbath was a signe of difference between them and all other prophane people of the world who derided the Jewes for their Sabbaths as 〈◊〉 derided them for this Quod septimâ—m partem 〈…〉 Because they lost the seventh part of their age in resting every seventh day Tostat. qu. 10. 8. And specially it was a signe of their sanctification because that day they were sequestred by an holy rest from thinking or studying upon prophane things and in respect of the exercises of religion upon that day whereby they were sanctified sanctificaâ—â—r verbo Dei we are sanctified by the word of God Simler And they did meet together ad confirmandam 〈…〉 to confirme their faith by the sacraments Osiander And because every Sabbath discatiâ— doctrinam meam you learne my doctrine c. Iunius QUEST XIV The reasons why the Sabbath must be observâ—d Vers. 13. FOr it is a signe c. There are here divers reasons yeelded for the observation of the Sabbath 1. The first is à sine from the end it was a signe betweene God and them 2. Ab â—tili it is holy unto you that is ordained for your benefit and commoditie as our blessed Saviour saith Mark 2.27 The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Pelarg. So also Cajetan It is holy unto you that is ad vestrum bonum mandatur custodiendum it is appointed to be kept for your good 3. A necessarie from the necessitie of it because if they did not keepe it they should surely die as thrice the punishment of death is here threatned to those that defile the Sabbath and doe any worke therein Pelarg. 4. From the authoritie of the Institutor quia dicatur Domino c. because it is consecrated unto God vers 15. It is the Sabbath of the holy rest unto the Lord therefore it ought to be observed Cajetan 5. A facili from the easinesse of the precept the Lord appointeth but one day for the holy rest whereas he alloweth six for labour Pelargus 6. Ab exemplo Dei from Gods example who created the world in six daies and rested the seventh Pelarg. Simlerus 7. A consequenti from the event or consequent in observing the Sabbath efficient in succedentibus generationibus c. They shall procure that a perpetuall covenant shall be established in their generations betweene the Lord and their posteritie for ever Cajetan QUEST XV. What death is meant in this phrase He shall die the death Vers. 14. SHall die the death Whereas there are divers kinds of death there is everlasting death both of bodie and soule in the next world and the temporall death in this life either of the soule in being deprived of the life of grace or of the bodie either by the hand of God by sudden and extraordinarie death or by the hand of the Magistrate according to these divers kinds of death so is this place diversly interpreted 1. Some referre it to everlasting death and excluding from the societie of Gods servants Iun. 2. Some understand it of being deprived of the life of grace Vita gratiae destituetuâ— hic infuturo seculo c. He shall be destitute of the life of grace both here and in the next world Lippoman 3. Some of being excluded from the people of God no more to be counted an Israelite Eâ— Oleastr 4. Some of the violent death by the Magistrate Osiander Simler 5. Some of extraordinarie death when God cutteth one off and so punisheth him by death unlooked for as God is said to offer a man into ones hand when he is suddenly killed
therefore thinketh right that these gates were onely the places of entrance into the great streets which went thorow the camp for the host lay in such order as that they had wayes and streets betweene their tents as wee see now in cities and townes as Iosephus also describeth the situation and disposing of the camp 3. Now Moses stood in the gate or entrance not because the use was to give sentence and judgement in the gates Lyran. Borrh. Or because Moses would have the Levites to give the onset in the beginning of a street and so to go thorow as Tostat. ibid. But this was the reason Moses tabernacle or tent was without the camp and so upon that occasion Moses stood in the entrance of the camp going now to his owne tent Iun. QUEST LXVIII Whether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie Vers. 26. ANd all the sonnes of Levi. R. Salom. to whom consenteth Tostatus thinketh Quod nullus de Levitis aliquid peccaverit That none of the Levites sinned in this great transgression because it is said All the sonnes of Levi gathered themselves unto him and if the Levites had sinned â—s other tribes there had beene no more cause to advance them to the Priesthood than other tribes Contra. 1. If that generall particle all bee pressed then it would follow that the children and all came which could not be for they were not able to use swords the meaning then is not that all the Levites came but all which came were Levites Iun. Sa. Or all is taken for many as this speech is usually restrained in Scripture as all nations are said to have come and bought corne in Egypt Gen. 41. 2. The Levites were more of Gods favour and grace than of their desert separated and selected for the Priesthood yet it is evident that this tribe was freer from consenting to this idolatrie than other tribes and for this their courage and readinesse in Gods service they received a blessing 2. Some thinke that even these Levites which armed themselves against their brethren were not altogether immunes à reatu free from this sinne but while they did it for feare levius peccarunt their sin was the lesse and so the mercie of the Lord appeared so much the more not only in pardoning their sin sed gloriam suam eorum manu asserere dignatus est but he vouchsafed by their hand to maintaine his glory Calvin Simler But it is not like that God would use their ministerie in the punishing of others which were guiltie of the same punishment themselves and their owne conscience accusing them they would have had no such courage to revenge the Lords cause upon their brethren it had beene also verie offensive to the guiltie parties to be punished by them which had beene alike guiltie And Moses proclaiming who pertaineth to the Lord let him come to me did meane that they only should come who had beene faithfull unto God and had not consented to that sinne 3. Some Hebrewes doe help the matter thus that because they cannot avoid it but that some of the kindred of the Levites were guiltie of this transgression because they did not spare their owne sonnes vers 29. that because it was lawfull for any of the other tribes to take unto them the wives of Levites their husbands being dead those children which they had by them might be said to be the sons of Levi that is grand children on their mothers side But this shift is taken away because Deut. 33.9 it is said that the Levites knew not their owne father or mother or children therefore they must needs bee understood to be Levites not by marriage or in some removed degree of kindred unto them but the immediate fathers and sonnes of Levites 4. Therefore the best opinion is that all of the tribe of Levi were not free from this sin of idolatrie many of them kept themselves as it is like at home and consented not but that a great sort even of Levi offended it may thus appeare 1. Because both Aaron himselfe was a ring-leader who can by no meanes be excused from this sin Lyranus 2. It could not be avoided but that many of the Levites were drawne away by Aarons example Iun. 3. But yet it is more evident because they consecrated their hands upon their owne sonnes and brethren yea their fathers and mothers that divers of the tribe of Levi fell away with the rest Lyran. Iun. Tostatus here answereth that the name of brethren is taken largely Pro fratribus qui sunt de filiis Israel For their brethren which were of the children of Israel qu. 35. Contra. 1. If it be allowed that the name of brethren is sometime so taken what saith he to the other names of father mother sonne These must be taken for the names of kindred or else we shall never have any certaintie in Scripture when we should by these names understand naturall fathers mothers and children 2. The other words companion and neighbour shew that the first is a name of kindred the first word ach signifieth here a brother in affinitie the second râ—ah a companion and friend the third karob Vicinia ratione conjunctum him that was a neighbour in dwelling and vicinitie or neernesse of place Simlerus 5. It is evident then that some of the Levites were accessarie to this great impietie because they were punished among the rest So that R. Salomon is herein greatly deceived who thinketh that the Levites though they were blame-worthy in not resisting the idolaters yet were not idolaters themselves neither consensu mentis nec facto exteriori in consent of minde nor in any outward fact c. for the Levites had beene unjustly punished if they had beene innocent Nay R. Moses Egyptius goeth further saying that although the Israelites often are found to have committed idolatrie yet Levita nunquam idolatraverunt the Levites never committed idolatrie But the contrarie is evident by Aarons fall for hee apparantly was an idolater in his externall act in building an altar unto the golden Calfe and offering sacrifice before it Paulus Burgensis in his reply proceedeth yet further that when our blessed Saviour was put to death the Levites as they are distinguished from the Priests were not principeâ— in crimine illo pâ—ssimo principall agents in that wicked crime whereas it is evident that the Priests were the chiefe enemies that Christ had the Levites indeed are not named but seeing the high Priest with the other Priests which were of the tribe of Levi were the contrivers of Christs death then cannot that whole tribe be exempted from this villanous act which is the intendment of Burgensis a great favourer of that nation QUEST LXIX Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them Vers. 27. THus saith the Lord c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that it is not necessarie here to understand that Moses had any speciall commandement
quantum praedestinati sunt in noticia Divina as they are ordained to salvation in the knowledge and prescience of God and they that are thus written can never bee blotted out another way they are scripti secundum quid written after a sort not according to the divine prescience or predestination Sed secundum dispositionem in eis actu existentem secundum praesentem justitiam But according to their disposition which is in act in them and according to their present justice and thus are they said to be blotted out not in respect of Gods knowledge as though any thing can fall out against his prescience but in respect of their change from grace into sinne 2. Thomas also to the same purpose some are said to bee blotted out Non secundum rei veritatem sed secundum hominum opinionem Not according to the truth of the thing but in the opinion of men for it is usuall in Scripture ut aliquid dicatur fieri quando innotescit that a thing should be said to be done when it appeareth So some are said to be written in the booke of life quia homines ibi opinantur scriptos propter presentem justitiam because men thinke they are there written in respect of their present justice Then some are there written ex pradestinatione by predestination which can never bee blotted out Some ex gratia in respect of their present grace which they may fall from and so be blotted out And againe in another place he expresseth the same thing in other termes Some are predestinate of God Insâ— ut simpliciter habituri vitam aeternam Simply to have life eternall in themselves and these are so written in the booke of life as they can never be blotted out And some are so written Vt habeant vitam aeternam non in se sed in sua causa To have life eternall not in themselves but in respect of their cause and present state of Justice which when they fall from they are said to be blotted out 3. So before them both Augustine We must not so take it brethren Quod quenquam Deus scribat in librâ— vitae deleat illum That God writeth any in the booke of life and blotteth him out for if a mortall man said that I have written I have written shall we thinke that God writeth and blotteth out Praescius est Deus praedestinavit omnes ante constitutionem mundi regnaturos cum filio God foreseeth all things and he did predestinate all before the making of the world that should reigne with his sonne c. Therefore this is said Secundum spem ipsorum qui ibi se scriptos putabant That some are written which are said to be blotted out in their owne opinion because they thought they were there written so that where it is said let them be blotted out of the booke of life the meaning is ut ipsos constet non illos ibi esse that it may appeare unto them that they are not there To this purpose Augustine as he is alleaged both by Simlerus and Borrhaius 4. Tostatus followeth the same distinction that some are written in the booke of life secundum firmam praedestinationem according to Gods sure predestination some only secundum praesentem justitiam in respect of their present justice these may bee blotted out and not the other but he addeth further that so likewise in the booke of Gods prescience wherein onely they are written whose end is damnation some are written there secundum firmam Dei praescientiam according to Gods firme prescience others secundum praesentem injustitiam according to their present injustice These may be blotted out and not the other And this writing of them in one booke according to their present justice in the other according to their present injustice he calleth the writing foris without the booke the other writing according to Gods predestination and prescience he saith is intus within the booke Then out of these positions he inferreth certaine conclusions 1. That it is possible for one to be written in both these bookes the booke of life and the booke of death together in the one according to Gods predestination or prescience in the other according to their present justice or injustice As he which is predestinate unto life may according to his present state of injustice be written in the booke of death foris without as Paul while he was yet a persecutor and one may be in Gods prescience written in the booke of death and yet according to his present state of grace he may be written in the booke of life as Iudas while yet he continued in Christs obedience and preached the Gospell 2. Yet it is possible for one to be written twice in the same booke both in regard of Gods prescience and his owne state and condition as Moses was thus written in the booke of life and Iudas when he betrayed Christ in the booke of death 3. They which are written in the booke of life according to predestination may be blotted out thence according to their present state and condition as David when he sinned and so in the other booke likewise as Saul while he was yet a vertuous King he was written in the booke of rejection in Gods prescience but blotted out in regard of his present justice 4. But he that is written in the booke of life according unto predestination cannot be written in the booke of death according to Gods prescience and so on the other side because one and the same cannot be foreseene of God both to salvation and condemnation 5. And they which are written according to their present justice in the booke of life cannot at the same time be written in the booke of death according to their present injustice because one cannot at the same time be counted righteous and wicked before God Tostat. qu. 43. But these exceptions may worthily be taken unto Tostatus conclusions 1. Because he maketh a booke of death and speaketh of putting in and blotting out of that booke whereas the Scripture acknowledgeth only a booke of life not any of death for not to be written in the booke of life though they bee not written in any other blacke booke is sufficient unto everlasting perdition 2. He calleth the booke of death the booke of Gods prescience only as though God were not a Judge also in condemning the vessels of wrath into hell and ordaining them justly thereunto as he is in the electing the vessels of honour to salvation 3. It is an errour that God writeth any in either of those bookes on the backside in respect of their present state or condition of justice or injustice for Gods writing there is unchangeable they are there said to be written in regard of their present state secundum spem ipsorum in their owne hope as Augustine or secundum opinionem hominâ—m according to the opinion of men that thinke them to be there written as Thomas before
if it be fervent Iam. 5.16 4. Observ. Spirituall things first to be begged in our prayers Vers. 18. SHew me thy glorie Ferus here giveth this note Moses ut plurimum spiritualia petit Moses doth for the most part aske spirituall things Which teacheth us that in all our requests wee should principally beg those things at the hands of God which concerne our soules as our blessed Saviour saith First seeke the Kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and all these things shall bee ministred unto you 5. Observ. Against the feare of death Vers. 20. NO man shall see me and live Then after death and this life ended wee shall see God Borrhaius hereupon well noteth Quam preciosa res sit mors animalis hominis c. What a precious thing the death of the bodie is which bringeth us to see God as S. Paul saith I desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ Philip. 1.23 Death then of a faithfull man is not to be feared CHAP. XXXIV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth the reconciliation it selfe of the Lord with his people consisting of three parts 1. The signes of this reconciliation going before to vers 8. 2. The substance of the reconciliation it selfe to vers 29. 3. The signes which followed after Moses was come downe 1. There are two signes of this reconciliation The first is externall and visible the preparing of the two tables of stone 1. Commanded to be made by the Lord vers 1. 2. With the manner of Moses comming up and the reverent behaviour of the people in the meane time vers 3. 3. And Moses obedience vers 4. The second is spirituall in the proclayming of the Lords name either shewing his substance Iehovah or his properties mercie toward the righteous or vengeance toward the wicked to vers 7. with the effect Moses humbling of himselfe vers 8. 2. The reconciliation consisteth of Moses humble suite to the Lord vers 9. and the Lords gracious answer wherein the Lord sheweth what he will doe for his people v. 10 11. then what he requireth of them where are propounded first morall lawes concerning the avoiding of idolatrie which are 〈◊〉 in number to vers 17. then ceremoniall which are three 1. Of their anniversarie and weekly feasts namely the Sabbath vers 18 21 22 23. 2. Of their first fruits of their cattell vers 19 20. and of their increase vers 29. 3. Of the manner of their sacrifices not to be offered with leaven vers 26. 3. The signes following are two first the bringing of the second tables with their writing by the Lord and Moses preparation thereunto by his fortie dayes fast vers 28 29. The second is the shining of Moses face where is described 1. The manner thereof vers 29. 2. The effects the astonishment of the people vers 30. 3. The remedie which Moses used which was double the inviting and calling of the people to come unto him vers 31 32. and the covering of his face vers 33. when he put it off when he went in to speake with God vers 34. and when hee put it on when he came out unto the people vers 35. 2. The divers readings Vers. 6. Iehovah Iehovah strong I. Iehovah Iehovah God B.G. cum caeter It seemeth rather to be an appellative than a proper name of the Lord here because of the distinction Rebia over Iehovah which separateth it from the sentence following Vers. 7. Not making the wicked innocent B.G.V.I.S. better than leaving one innocent B. or with whom none is by himselfe innocent L. See the reason hereof quest 11. Vers. 10. Behold I will make a covenant before all the people I will doe mervailes I. better than I will make a covenant before all the people and I will worke B.G. cum cater for there is a distinction at covenant and it is in the Hebrew I will worke not and I will worke Vers. 30. His face shined B.G.A.P. or streamed V. was glorious S. the brightnesse thereof was multiplied C. not cornuta erat was hornie L. See afterward the question upon this verse Vers. 33. When Moses had made an end of comming c. hee put a covering I. or So Moses made an end c. and had put a covering c. G. better than when he had made an end c. he put a covering V.L.S.C. it is better translated in the preterpluperfectense for then Moses had most need in respect of the peoples infirmitie to put a vaile upon his face when he spake unto them See the 51. qu. following 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Wherefore the second tables were given Vers. 1. HEw thee two tables of stone 1. The Lord commandeth two tables of stone to bee prepared that it might bee a signe of his perfect reconciliation with the people in these respects 1. Because by this appeared that the Lord purposed not to destroy them for then he would not have given them a law and this was a signe that God would goe before them and be their guide still because he was their spirituall guide in giving them direction by his law Tostat. qu. 1. 2. And seeing the Arke was appointed to receive and keepe the tables of stone it shewed that the Lord purposed that whatsoever he had before prescribed concerning the making of the Tabernacle should stand Cajetan 3. And that he willeth the like tables in all respects to be made he thereby signifieth that he would have all things to returne to their former state Simler 2. But though God returned in grace unto them yet in that he prepareth not these tables as he did the first but willeth Moses to provide them he would have aliquod pâ—â—na vestigium rostare therein some marks of their punishment to remaine Ac si sanato vulnere manerâ—t â—â—catrix as though the scar remained after the healing of the wound Calvin 3. But the people are not sprinkled againe with bloud as they were at the first as neither now they which fall after Baptisme are baptised againe but it sufficed onely those things to be restored by repentance which were decayed by their transgression Ferus QUEST II. Why the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee HEw thee 1. R. Salomon doth gather hereupon because Moses is bid to hew unto himselfe c. that the Lord shewed a quarrie of Saphir stone whereout Moses hewed the tables and so he is willed to hew unto himselfe two tables of stone that is to his commoditie for Moses he saith became very rich by the fragments that were left in hewing of the tables But seeing no such thing is mentioned in Scripture nor yet by Iosephus who was more ancient than R. Salomon it is rather to be thought to be one of his fables Lyran. and beside they lay an unjust and untrue imputation upon Moses as though he intended and respected his owne profit whereas all his courses shew the contrarie that hee sought still the good
cognitione carent quae cognitio non alia re quà m fide in Christum constet Which want the knowledge of Christ which knowledge consisteth in nothing else than in faith in Christ. Marbach Commentar in hunc locum Against this opinion that faith in Christ is not commanded in the Morall law the reasons follow afterward but first the question must further be explaned 1. First then we are to distinguish of faith which is of foure kindes or sorts 1. There is fides initialis or fundamentalis the faith of beginnings or the fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Hebr. 11.6 That he which commeth unto God must beleeve that God is c. And this kinde of faith toward God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginnings Heb. 6. 1. This faith apprehendeth onely the being and essence of God to know him to be the only Lord. 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the faith of miracles touched by the Apostle 1. Cor 13.2 If I had all faith so that I could remove mountaines 3. There is fides historica an historicall faith which beleeveth all things to bee true that are written in the Scriptures in which sense S Iames saith The Devils beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true which the Scripture speaketh of God of his justice power punishing of sinners rewarding of the righteous 4. There is beside these a justifying faith whereof S. Paul maketh mention In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Sonne of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for me Galath 2.20 This faith is the life of the soule whereby hee which beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himselfe the merits of Christs death Now this is the difference betweene these foure kindes of faith the first apprehendeth the essence and being of God the second the faith of miracles his power the third which is the historicall faith his truth the fourth namely the justifying faith his mercie The three first to beleeve God to be to beleeve him to bee omnipotent to beleeve him to be just and true are included in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. but not the last wherein is the errour of the Romanists that make all these kindes of faith the same in substance differing only in property which if it were true then it were possible for them that have the one faith to have the other and so Devils also which in some sort doe beleeve should also be capable of justifying faith But this matter that all these kindes of faith are not the same in substance nor of like nature with the justifying faith is shewed elsewhere whither I referre the Reader 2. Further we are to distinguish of the law for it is taken sometime more largely either for all the Scriptures of the old Testament as Luk 16.17 It is more easie that heaven and earth should passe away than that one title of the law should fall So Ioh. 15.25 It is written in their law they have hated mee without a cause which testimony is found in the Psalmes Psal. 35.19 or else the law is taken for all the bookes of Moses and so the Law and Prophets are named together Matth. 7.12 This is the Law and the Prophets But the law is sometime taken more strictly for the Morall law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. I knew not sinne but by the law and so S. Paul opposeth the law of workes to the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Now as the law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sense both contained and commanded in the law for of Christ the Lord spake by the mouth of his Prophets Luk. 1.70 And Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of mee Ioh. 5.45 But as the law is taken strictly for the Morall law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements so we deny this justifying faith to bee commanded in the law 3. Indirectly or by way of consequent it will not bee denied but that this faith also is implied in the law because we are bound by the law to beleeve the Scriptures and the whole word of God for this is a part of Gods worship to beleeve his word to be true and so some define faith Est certa persuafio qua assentimur omni verbo Dei nobis tradita It is a certaine perswasion whereby wee give assent to all the word of God Vrsin And so by this precept wee are bound to receive all the promises and doctrines concerning Christ delivered in the old and new Testament But directly as a part and branch and so a worke of the law wee deny justifying faith to be in this precept or any other prescribed or commanded The reasons are these 1. The Morall law and the Gospell differ in the very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man the other is revealed and wrought by grace The first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the law do by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 The other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2.24 We are justified freely by his grace The argument then may be framed thus The morall law is graft in the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall all men should have faith which the Apostle denieth 2. Thessal 3.2 Faith then in Christ belongeth not to the law Therefore it is strange that Bellarmine confessing in another place that pracepta decalogi sunt explicationes juris natura that the precepts of the decalogue are the explications of the law of nature Lib. 2. de Imaginib Sanctor cap. 7. could not inferre hereupon that the precepts of faith and of the Gospell are no explications of the law of nature and therefore have no dependance of the morall law Ambrose useth this very argument Nemo sub lâ—ge fidem constituat lex enim intra mensuram ultra mensuram gratia Let no man place faith in the law for the law is within the measure and compasse of nature but grace is beyond measure Ambros. in 12. Luc. 2. The effects of the law of works and the law of faith are divers for the one worketh feare the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but yee have received the spirit of adoption whereby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8.17 Againe the Apostle saith The letter killeth the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus then the argument standeth the same thing cannot bee the instrument of contrary things of life and death peace
among souldiers and robbing by the high way where ones life is put in danger All these kindes being more than simple thefts may receive the sentence of death by Moses Law and Magistrates herein may with a good conscience execute the rigour of the Law upon such violent outragious impudent wanton and incorrigible thefts But they are wisely to consider every circumstance and the occasion that draweth one to steale whether he doe it of necessity to releeve his hungry soule or of an evill custome and obstinate minde to maintaine his lewd and unthrifty life In the first case it seemeth to be too sharpe to take away ones life unlesse he be such an one as will take no warning but continueth hardened in his sinne And so for simple and single theft only except it be in stealing of men unlesse it be aggravated by other circumstances concurring 〈◊〉 violence rapine obstinacie custome in sinne and such like neither the Law of Moses prescribeth punishment of death nor yet is it practised by our Lawes which in such cases intend favour by allowing the privilege of the booke See before p. 6. QUEST IV. Why the theefe breaking up might be killed Vers. 6. IF a theefe be found breaking up c. 1. R. Salomon thinketh that this Law which alloweth the theefe found breaking up an house to be slaine is understood not only of theeves that breake in by night but by day also and that clause which followeth When the Sunne riseth upon him they interpret metaphorically that if it be evident and manifest as the light that the theefe came not only to steale but to kill that whether by day or night he may be killed So also the Chalde Interpreter seemeth to follow the same sense Si oculus testium vidit eum If the eye of witnesses saw him that is if it were evident that he came not only as a theefe but to assault Contra. Though this be true that a man might defend himselfe even by day against him that assaulted his life yet this is not the meaning here the words of the Law are literally not metaphorically to be understood 2. The reason of this difference betweene a night theefe and a day theefe is because in the night breaking in it is not knowne whether he came to steale only or to murther but in the day it may easily appeare by his armour and weapons Tostat. Simler Beside in the day he may call for helpe against the theefe which cannot be so well done in the night when he is left without all other remedy but his owne defence Galas Marbach And in the day he may have witnesses of his theft and so convent him before the Magistrate Lippom. 3. The Romane Lawes allow not onely to kill a night theefe but a day theefe also si se tel◠defenderit if he defend himselfe by a weapon Moses Law much disagreeth not for though he that commeth only as a theefe in the day time is not to be killed but to make restitution only yet if he come with weapons as having a murtherers intent now he may be repelled by force even as a night theefe may not now as a theefe but as one which commeth to assault and murther Iunius QUEST V. How it is made lawfull for a private man to kill a theefe Vers. 2. ANd be smitten that he dye no bloud shall be imputed 1. Cajetanus here observeth that this Law simply alloweth not to kill the theefe but if a man smite him in his owne defence not intending to kill him that in this case he shall be free Percussio fuit intenta mors autem per accidens sequnta c. He intended only to smite him but death followed accidentally upon such smiting so also Simler Non probat ut animo occidendi feriatur This Law alloweth not that he should be stricken with a minde to kill him sed indulget affectui c. but it beareth with a mans sudden passion if in defence of himselfe it so fall out that he be killed 2. But this Law seemeth not only to permit one to smite a night theefe but directly to kill him also so it be not with a desire to kill him where he may otherwise escape but to defend him and his from violence which he cannot doe unlesse the theefe be killed Borrh. 3. For seeing both the Law of nature and other Civill lawes doe allow a man to defend himselfe now when the Lawes doe arme a man they seeme publicam personam imponere to impose upon him a publike person so that now he smiteth not as a private man but by authority of the Law and in this case he is tanquam minister vindex Dei as the minister and revenger of God so that he doe it not of a lust and raging desire to be revenged but intending to use a lawfull defence in the safegard of his owne life Gallas And the case is here all one as if a man being set upon by the high way should kill him that maketh the assault upon him Marbach QUEST VI. After what manner the theefe was to be sold. Vers. 3. HE should be sold for his theft c. 1. So was also the Law among the Romans that the debter should be given up in bonds unto his creditor Whereupon Cato was wont to say Fures privates in nexu compedibus vivere publicos in aur◠purpura c. That private theeves lived in chaines and fetters but the publike in gold and purple c. But this custome because it seemed very hard was abrogated by the Law of Arcadius and Honorius Gallas 2. But here it must be considered whether the theefe were an Hebrew or a stranger if an Hebrew how great soever the debt were for his theft he could be but sold over for six yeeres for all Hebrew servants were to goe out free the seventh And as the theft was valued so should he serve more yeeres or fewer But if he were a stranger he might be sold over to serve all his life if the value of the theft were great if it were but small he was but to be sold to serve so many yeeres as might suffice to recompence the theft Tostat. QUEST VII Why the theefe is only punished double with whom the thing stollen is found Vers. 4. HE shall restore double 1. That is one beside that he stole because that is found in his hand which is stollen and so restored Iun. And so must the five oxen be taken which the theefe must make good five with that which was stollen Lippom. 2. Now the reasons why when the thing stollen is found only double must be restored and five or foure-fold when it was killed or sold are these 1. Because he seemeth to be the more cunning theefe when the thing stollen cannot be found 2. Adhuc difficilior ratio in investigando and it is harder to finde out the theft and therefore he is worthy to be more punished Simler 3. Potest haberi
to take upon him our humane nature So also Osiander Marbach For if the Lord had appeared here in any humane forme Moses reason had not beene sufficient dehorting the people from idolatry because they saw no Image in the day that the Lord spake unto them in Horeb Deut. 4.15 For though the Lord had then appeared in any Image yet if he had at this time so shewed himselfe they might have taken occasion thereby to resemble God by some Image therefore neither then nor now did the Lord so appeare Tostat. quaest 13. 4. Neither yet because it is said Vnder his feet c. did they see as the feet of a man as Cajetane thinketh Sub specie Iudicis quasi hominis visus est c. He was seene as a Judge sitting in judgement and so they saw but his feet but this is so said quantum ad situm in respect of the site and placing because the pavement of Saphir was beneath as under the feet and they might imagine the more glorious part of Gods Majesty to be upward Tostatus 5. Neither yet is the meaning Quod clarius cognoverint Deum c. That they only knew the Lord more clearely than the common people Ferus Or as the Septuagint translate they saw only the place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where the Lord stood 6. But the Lord by a bright shining cloud shewed his Majesty and presence as the Chalde Interpreter readeth Viderunt gloriam Dei Israel They saw the glory of the God of Israel and that much more now than when hee appeared in mount Sinai when notwithstanding the people said The Lord hath shewed us his glory and greatnesse Deut. 5.24 Tostat. So also Calvin Forma ipsius Dei nulla describitur sed basis in qua stabat c. There is no forme described of God but the bottome where he stood is said to be like unto Saphir c. QUEST XXII Wherein the place under Gods feet is said to be like to Saphir Vers. 10. AS a pavement or stone-worke of Saphir 1. This place under Gods feet for the colour is resembled unto the precious stone called the Saphir and to the cleare heavens Tostatus thinketh the Saphir to be of a bright reddish colour and that two colours are hereby signified a bright shining red and a blew or azure as in the skie But the Saphir stone is knowne to be of a skie blewish and airy colour as Hierome observeth and one of these similitudes is added to explaine the other Borrhains saith that the fairest Saphirs are full of red golden spots So also Oleaster Which answereth to this description that the pavement or bricke worke for so libnath signifieth either bricke or stone is said to be of Saphir Tostatus further thinketh that it is compared unto caelum stellatum the starrie skie but QUEST XXIII In what sense the Lord is said not to lay his hand 〈…〉 Vers. 11. VPon the Nobles c. he laid not his hand The laying of the hand is taken in Scripture 〈◊〉 threefold sense 1. The hand of God was said to be upon the Prophets when the Spirit of God came upon them And so Ab. Ezra understandeth this text Non porrexit illis manum He did not 〈◊〉 his hand unto them He gave them not the Spirit of Prophecie as he did to Moses they did not see God so cleerely as Moses did But the wordâ— are to be joyned together thus That although they sâ—â— God yet his hand was not upon them and then no such sense can be gathered Calvin 2. The laying on of the hand signifieth also to hide as God is said to have laid his hand upon Moses as he passed by Exod. 33. And so they make the meaning to be this that God did not hide himselfe to 〈◊〉 which were farre off as the Latine text is that is hee shewed himselfe also to the people in the 〈◊〉 Lyranus Gloss. 〈◊〉 Tostatus But the word is 〈◊〉 which signifieth to separate the text then meaneth those 70. Elders which Moses had selected and separated from the rest Iun. Lippom. Or 〈◊〉 may be derived of etâ—â—l which signifieth neare as Gen. 41.3 They 〈◊〉 neere or by the 〈◊〉 and so in this place iâ— may betoken those which were neere unto God namely the 70. Elders who came neerer than the rest of the people Oleaster 3. There is also a third signification of this phrase to lay the hand is to sinite or punish contrarie whereto is that phrase To take his hand from one 1 Sam. 6.5 that is to leave smiting or punishing So thâ—n the meaning here is Non 〈…〉 Hee sent not upon them his hurting hand Cajetaâ—â— Non 〈…〉 Hee killed them not Lippomanus For it was a received opinion in those dayes that no man could see God and live Oleaster Nihil incommodi senserunt They felt no harme after this Simlerus QUEST XXIV Why they are said to eat and drinke Vers. 11. ANd did eat and drinke c. 1. Rab. Salomon saith that this is added to shew their fault that after they had seene God as though they had not much cared for it they turned them to temporall pleasures in eating and drinking And though God did forbeare them now yet afterward they were punished Nadab and Abâ—hu died in the Tabernacle by fire sent of God Levit 10. and the Elders afterward at the grave of lust Numb 11. Contra. 1. It seemeth that God was not offended with them in this place because he laid not his hand upon them and therefore it is not like that they shewed any such contempt 2. Nadab and Abihu were afterward smitten but it was not for any such fault committed here but for offering strange fire Tostat. qu. 15. 2. Some understand it of their rejoycing as if they had eaten and drunke so the Châ—lde But here is no such note of similitude Quasi 〈◊〉 c. As though they did eat But it is expressed plainly They did eat It is then to bee taken rather historice historically than metaphorice metaphorically Tostatus 3. Ab. Ezra giveth this sense that although they had seene God yet they were not so ravished with it as Moses was that did neither eat nor drinke 40. dayes after but they did eat and drinke afterward 4. Some here by understand the spirituall delight which they conceived which is sometime expressed by eating and drinking as Christ saith to his Disciples in the Gospell That yee may eat and drinke at 〈◊〉 table in my Kingdome Ferus 5. Some referre it to their publike feastes which they made that day in token of their joy They are and dranke in laetitia magna post talem 〈◊〉 in great mirth after such a vision Lyran So also Tostat. Osiander 6. But the proper and true sense is this Salvi integri manserunt They remained sound and in good health Calvin Tanquam omnino incolumis comederunt c. As in perfect health they did eat and drinke they onely escaped not death but
all other kinde of punishment whatsoever Cajetan And this their health is expressed by these actions of life as Hagar argueth her life by another action of life Gen. 16.13 I have seene after him that seeth Iun. So also Gallas Simler 7. Before they were sprinkled with bloud Gods hand was in some sort upon them in terrifying them Whosoever touched the mountaine should die But now after their sprinkling they are cheared and refreshed and are not forbidden the sight of God which signifieth that we onely have accesse unto God by the bloud of Christ Rupertus Ferus QUEST XXV Whether this were a new commandement or the other mentioned vers 1 2. repeated Vers. 12. ANd the Lord said unto Moses c. 1. Some thinke that this is the same commandement repeated which was given unto Moses before vers 1 2. Iun. Tostatus addeth further that when the Lord said to Moses vers 2. Moses himselfe alone shall come neere to the Lord that Moses then 〈◊〉 know that he should goe up to receive the Tables for to what end should Moses have gone forth of the campe accompanied with Aaron and the rest if it had not beene to some end qu. 15. Contra. Yes it was sufficient that God called Moses and bade him come up into the mount though he at the same time had not shewed the end of his comming as chap. 19.24 when God bade him come up the cause is not shewed why he was called the Commandements of God are simplie to be obeyed though it please not the Lord alwayes to shew a reason thereof 2. Wherefore I thinke rather that this was a divers commandement from the former and given him at a divers time Piscator Osiander 1. Cajetane reason is Mandat non solùm ascendere in montem sed morari in eo He biddeth him not onely to come up into the mountaine but to abide there c. which was not said to him before 2. Calvin addeth further that after Moses with his companie were gone up and had seene this vision Altius evehitur Moses c. ut cognoscerent c. Moses is carried up higher that they should know that Moses would have gone no further but at Gods commandement c. It was requisite therefore that Moses should bee called againe and sequestred from the rest that he might not bee thought to have presumed without a warrant 3. Severus maketh a mysterie of it that Moses being gone up with Aaron and the rest Iterum aâ—diâ—â— heareth againe come up And by these two ascendings hee understandeth the two senses of the law the literall and spirituall 4. Ferus maketh this application of it Hic jam tertio vocatur Moses in montem c. Moses is the third time called into the mount to shew that he which is set over the people of God ought often to ascend in prayer 5. Rupertus also understandeth here two ascendings using this reason It is said before vers 9. that Moses and Aaron with the rest ascended but not that they ascended unto the Lord as here the Lord saith Come up to me c. So also Hugo de S. Victor Come up to me which must be so understood that De colle in quo erat ad altiora montis procedâ—ret c. From the hill where he was hee should proceed higher into the mountaine QUEST XXVI What is signified by Moses going up to the mountaine COme up to me into the mountaine 1. Beda draweth this place unto a mysticall sense Moses is called up to the mountaine Vt ex altitudine loci colligat quà m excelsa sit lex That by the height of the place he should gather how high and removed from humane capacitie the law was which he was to receive As our blessed Saviour in the Gospell called his Apostles into the mountaine Matth. 5. and after his resurrection he also appeared in the mountaine when he gave commission to his Apostles to goe and preach the Gospell to all the world but here is the difference because the law which Moses was to receive was but given unto one people therefore Moses onely was called up but the Gospell being appointed to be preached to all the world Christ called all his Apostles to him up into the mountaine 2. Rupertus maketh this ascending up of Moses into the mount a figure of Christs ascending up unto God Non in montem terrenum sed in ipsum coelum Not into an earthly mountaine but into heaven to receive not the killing letter but the quickening Spirit as the Apostle saith He ascended up on high led captivitie captive and gave gifts unto men c. 3. Ferus doth thus moralize it that he which will behold God and give himselfe to contemplation must terrena haec inferiora despicere c. despise these inferiour and terrene things as Moses leaving the campe below ascended up into the mount QUEST XXVII Of the tables of stone whereof they were made and wherefore given Vers. 12. I Will give thee tables of stone 1. The fabulous Jewes imagine that these tables of the law were made of the Saphire a pretious stone Lyran. and that when Moses had broken them comming downe from the mountaine he gathered up the fragments and broken peeces and sold them whereby he was greatly enriched Thus these blinde Jewes are not ashamed to blemish their great Prophet Moses with the note of covetousnesse from the which he was most free Tostat. quaest 16. 2. As frivolous is that other conceit because they are said to be of stone that the tables were but one stone which sometimes seemed but one sometime two for in that they are called tables it sheweth they were more than one of one stone they might bee both that is of one kinde of stone and yet the tables were two 3. These tables of stone were created of God for that speciall use as Exod. 32.16 they are said to be the worke of God it is not improbable that they were noviter creata created of God anew as Tostatus but it is not like that they were written by the Angell which Tostatus thinketh to have spoken in Gods person in the mount for as God prepared the tables themselves so hee caused the writing they were the worke of God for the matter and the writing of God for the manner Exod. 33.16 4. All the lawes which God gave his people were not there written but onely the morall precepts the rest Moses writ sustained in the dayes of his flesh Pelarg. 2. This fast was kept by Moses and the like by 〈…〉 Christi idoneum haberet 〈…〉 That the humanitie of Christ might have a sufficient testimonie for unlesse Moses and Helias had fasted fortie dayes some might have doubted of the humanitie of Christ in holding out so miraculous a fast So Rupertus and Ferus following him 3. And these fasted to this end ut tanto miraculo homines mali c. that men being moved by so great a miracle should not contemne their
externall act 6. qu. The law of Moses did not onely restraine the hand but the minde 7. qu. Whether any morall and naturall duties were to be restrained by positive law 8. qu. Of the perfection and sufficiencie of the Morall law 9. qu. Of the abrogation of the law Questions upon the rest of this twentieth Chapter 1. QUest In what sense the people are said to have seene the voices which are properly heard and not seene 2. qu. What is meant here by voices whether the thunder or other voices 3. qu. VVhether there were a sound of the trumpet beside the voices 4. qu. Of the feare of the people and their going backe 5. qu. VVhy they desire that Moses would speake unto them 6. qu. VVhy the people are afraid they shall die 7. qu. How the Lord is said to come unto them and why 8. qu. How the Lord is said to tempt and prove his people 9. qu. VVhy the people stood afarre off and where 10. qu. How Moses is said to draw neere to the darknesse 11. qu. VVhy the Lord saith he spake unto them from heaven 12. qu. Why this precept is repeated of not making any graven image 13. qu. Of the meaning of these words Yee shall not make with me 14. qu. VVhy mention is made onely of images of silver and gold 15. qu. VVhy the Lord commanded an Altar of earth to be made 16. qu. VVhy the Altar was not to be made of hewen stone 17. qu. VVhy the lifting up of the toole is said to pollute the Altar 18. qu. How Jeremie is made to agree with Moses who saith the Lord commanded not any thing concerning sacrifices 19. qu. Of the difference betweene burnt offerings and peace offerings 20. qu. Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice in no other place than before the Arke or Tabernacle 21. qu. Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice before the Arke at the Tabernacle while they were asunder 22. qu. How long the Arke was severed from the Tabernacle 23. qu. Of the removing of the Tabernacle 24. qu. Of the places where it was lawfull or unlawfull to sacrifice 25. qu. How God is said to come and goe and how he is said to be in the world 26. qu. Whether it were not lawfull to goe up by steps to the Altar 27. qu. Why they were forbidden to use steps up to the Altar 28. qu. Of the abominable Idoll of the Gentiles called Priapus and the filthie usages thereto belonging 29. qu. Why the secret parts are counted uncomely Questions upon the one and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Of the necessitie of the Iudiciall lawes 2. qu. The difference of the Morall Iudiciall and Ceremoniall lawes 3. qu. How the Ceremonials are abolished 4. qu. How far the Iudicials are now to be retained 5. qu. Why these lawes are called Iudgements 6. qu. How Moses propounded these lawes by speaking or by writing 7. qu. Why the Israelites were called Hebrewes 8. qu. How the Hebrewes became servants 9. qu. The difference betweene Hebrew servants and strangers 10. qu. Of three kinds of libertie and how servitude is agreeable to the law of nature 11. qu. How these six yeares are to be accounted 12. qu. The reasons why they ought to set their servants free 13. qu. Why the space of six yeares is limited for their service 14. qu. How the servant is said to come in with his bodie 15. qu. What manner of wise the master was to give to his servant 16. qu. Whether such separation betweene the servant and his wife were lawfull 17. qu. Why the servant was brought before the Iudges and what doore he was set to 18. qu. Of the divers kinds of punishments used among the Israelites 19. qu. What is meant here by Ever 20. qu. When the servant was to goe out free in the seventh yeare when in the fiftieth yeare 21. qu. Certaine cases put when the yeare of Iubile came before the yeare of remission 22. qu. Whether it were lawfull among the Israelites for the parents to sell their children 23. qu. In what sense it is said She shall not goe out as other servants 24. qu. Whether it must be read betrothed or betrothed not 25. qu. How shee was to be redeemed 26. qu. Why it was not lawfull to sell their maids to strangers 27. qu. What the meaning is of these words He hath despised her 28. qu. What kinde of betrothing is here understood 29. qu. Whether it were lawfull to take another wife to the former 30. q. Of the true reading and meaning of the 10. vers 31. qu. What these three things are mentioned in the text 32. qu. Whether maid servants were set free in the seventh yeare and not sometime before sometime after 33. qu. The summarie sense of this law concerning maid servants 34. qu. Of the end scope and intent of this law 35. qu. What kinde of smiting is here meant 36. qu. Why the murtherer was to die the death 37. qu. In what sense the Lord is said to offer a man into ones hand 38. qu. What places of refuge were appointed 39. qu. Why the Lord appointed places for such to flie unto 40. qu. What is to be counted wilfull murder 41. qu. Of the difference betweene voluntarie and involuntarie murder and the divers kinds of each 42. qu. Why the wilfull murderer was to be taken from the Altar 43. qu. What manner of smiting of parents is forbidden 44. qu. Of the grievous sin of paricide 45. qu. The law of manstealing expounded 46. qu. The reason why manstealing was punished by death 47. qu. What kinde of cursing of parents is here understood 48. qu. What manner of strife the law meaneth 49. qu. What punishment the smiter had if he which were smitten died 50. qu. VVhat should become of the smiter if the other died after he walked upon his staffe 51. qu. Of the equity of this law in bearing of the charges 52. qu. VVho should beare the charges if a servant had done the hurt 53. qu. VVhat servants this law meaneth and what kinde of chastisement is forbidden 54. q. The meaning of this clause For he is his money 55. qu. VVhether this law meane the voluntarie or involuntarie hurt done to a woman with child 56. qu. VVhether the death of the infant be punished as well as of the mother 57. qu. VVhether this law extendeth it selfe to infants which miscarie being not yet perfectly formed 58. qu. VVhy the action is given unto the husband 59. qu. VVhether the law of retalion be literally to be understood 60. qu. VVhether the law of retalion were just and equall 61. qu. Of servants freedome for the losse of an eye or tooth 62. qu. VVhat manner of smiting and goaring of a beast is here understood 63. qu. VVhy the ox that goareth was commanded to be stoned to death 64. qu. VVhy the flesh of the ox was not to be eaten 65. qu. In what case the owner is to die when his ox goareth any to death 66.
qu. VVhether the owner might redeeme his life with money 67. qu. VVhat servants this law meaneth Hebrewes or strangers 68. qu. VVhy a certaine summe of money is set for all servants 69. qu. VVhat kinde of welles this law meaneth where and by whom digged 70. qu. How the live and dead ox are to be divided where they were not of equall value Questions upon the two and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Of the divers kinds of theft 2. qu. VVhy five oxen are restored for one and for a stollen sheepe but foure 3. qu. Of the divers punishment of theft and whether it may be capitall 4. qu. VVhy the theefe breaking up might be killed 5. qu. How it is made lawfull for a private man to kill a theefe 6. qu. After what manner the theefe was to be sold. 7. qu. VVhy the theefe is onely punished double with whom the thing stollen is found 8. qu. How man is to make recompence of the best of his ground 9. qu. Of the breaking out of fire and the damages thereby 10. qu. VVhy the keeper of things in trust is not to make good that which is lost 11. qu. How the fraud in the keeper of trust was to be found out and punished 12. qu. VVhat is to be done with things that are found 13. qu. How this law of committing things to trust differeâ—h from the former 14. qu. How the cause of theft differeth from other casualties in matters of trust 15. qu. VVhether it were reasonable that the matter should be put upon the parties oath 16. qu. VVhat was to bee done if the thing kept in trust were devoured of some wilde beast 17. qu. Of the law of borrowing and lending when the thing lent is to be made good when not 18. q. Why such a strait law is made for the borrower 19. qu. Why the hirer is not to make good the thing hired as when it is borrowed 20. qu. Whether the fornicator by this law is sufficiently punished 21. qu. Why the woman committing fornication bee not as well punished by the law 22. qu. What kinde of dowrie this law speaketh of 23. qu. How this law differeth from that Deut. 22.29 24. qu. What was to be done if the fornicator were not sufficient to pay the dowrie 25. qu. What if the fornicator refused to take the maid to wife 26. qu. Whether this law were generall without any exception 27. qu. How farre this positive law against fornication doth binde Christians now 28. qu. Why the law doth require the consent of the father to such mariages 29. qu. Why next to the law of fornication followeth the law against witchcraft 30. qu. What kinde of witchcraft is here understood 31. qu. Whether love may be procured by sorcerie 32. qu. Whether witches can indeed effect any thing and whether they are worthie to bee punished by death 33. qu. Of the odious sinne of bestiall and unnaturall lust 34. qu. The reasons why men are given over to unnaturall lust 35. qu. What is meant by sacrificing to other gods 36. qu. Whether idolatrie now is to bee punished by death 37. qu. Why idolatrie is judged worthie of death 38. qu. Of kindnesse how to be shewed toward strangers and why 39. qu. Why widowes and Orphanes are not to be oppressed 40. qu. How and by what meanes prayers are made effectuall 41. qu. Why usurie is called biting 42. qu. What usurie is 43. qu. Of divers kinds of usuries 44. qu. That usurie is simplie unlawfull 45. qu. Certaine contracts found to be usurie not commonly so taken 46. qu. Whether all increase by the lone of money be unlawfull 48. qu. Whether it were lawfull for the Iewes to take usurie of the Gentiles 49. qu. What garment must bee restored before the Sun set which was taken to pledge and why 50. qu. Who are understood here by gods and why 51. qu. VVhy the Magistrate is not to be reviled and with what limitation this law is to be understood 52. qu. VVhether S. Paul transgressed this law Act. 23. when hee called the high Priest painted wall and whether indeed he did it of ignorance 53. qu. VVhat is understood here by abundance of liquor 54. qu. Of the difference of first fruits and tithes 55. qu. Of the divers kinds of tithe 56. qu. Reasons why tithes ought to be payed 57. qu. VVhether this law bee understood of the redemption of the first borne or of their consecration to Gods service 58. qu. VVhy the first borne of cattell were not to bee offered before the eighth day 59. qu. Of the meaning of this law whether it were mysticall morall or historicall 60. qu. VVhy they are forbidden to eat flesh torne of beasts 61. qu. Of the use and signification of this law Questions upon the three and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Of raysing or reporting false tales 2. qu. What it is to put to the hand to be a false witnesse 3. qu. How great a sin it is to be a false witnesse 4. qu. VVhether in this law we are to understand the mightie or the many 5. qu. How the poore is not to be esteemed in judgement 6. qu. How person are accepted in judgement and how far the poore may be respected 7. qu. VVhy mercie is to bee shewed toward the enemies oxe and asse 8. qu. VVhether it is to bee read Thou shalt helpe him or lay it aside with him 9. qu. How the poore mans cause is perverted in judgement 10. qu. Against lying in judgement and how it may be committed 11. qu. VVho are meant here by the just and innocent 12. qu. In what sense God is said not to justifie the wicked 13. qu. VVhether a Iudge ought alwayes to follow the evidence when he himselfe knoweth the contrarie 14. qu. A Iudge is not bound of his knowledge to condemne a man not found guiltie in publike judgement 15. qu. VVhat a dangerous thing it is for a Iudge to take gifts 16. qu. VVhether all kinde of gifts are unlawfull 17. qu. VVhy strangers are not to bee oppressed in judgement 18. qu. Of the divers festivals of the Hebrewes 19. qu. VVhy the land was to rest the seventh yeare 20. qu. What the poore lived upon in the seventh yeare 21. qu. VVhether the seventh yeare were generally neglected in Israel 490. yeares together as Tostatus thinketh 22. qu. Why the law of the Sabbath is so oft repeated 23. qu. VVhat manner of mention of strange gods is here forbidden 24. qu. VVhy it is forbidden to sweare by the name of strange gods 25. qu. Whether a Christian may compell a Iew to sweare by his Thorah which containeth five books of Moses 26. qu. VVhether a Iew may be urged to sweare by the name of Christ. 27. qu. VVhether a Saracon may be urged to sweare upon the Gospell or in the name of Christ. 28. qu. VVhether a Christian may sweare upon the the Iewes Thorah 29. qu. That it is not lawfull for a Christian to sweare upon the Turkes Alcaron or