Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n aaron_n atonement_n numb_a 25 3 10.6050 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A43139 A Sermon disswading obloquie against governours preached on Sunday Decemb. 7, 1662 in a solemne audience, and now, at the request of divers that heard it, made publick / by William Haywood. Haywood, William, 1599 or 1600-1663. 1663 (1663) Wing H1238; ESTC R25425 18,140 47

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

indignation against any that dared it Not Jannes and Jambres those counter-working Sorcerers but for their foul tongues were plagued with foul botches Exod. 9.11 not Corah a Levite nor Dathan and Abiram Princes of the Congregation but as they misled others by their example Numb 16.32 so were themselves made examples by no common judgements Not any of the people were their complaints never so urgent not those that lacked water at the wilderness of Sin Numb 11.34 nor those that lusted for Flesh at Kibroth Hattaavah Numb 11.3 nor those that complained of their way at Taberah not any of these were they few or many escaped judgement no not all the many all the Congregation gathered as one man against Moses and Aaron Numb 14.10 deceived by the timorous spies Num. 14.2 but did their penance for it in Pestilence in Fire in the stings of Serpents in sundry kinds of death till they were all consumed even more then 600000. men excepting onely Caleb and Joshuah Numb 14.30 To omit those that murmured upon the destruction of Corah whose plague found no stop but the atonement of Aaron Numb 16.50 not Aaron himself though the brother of Moses Numb 12.4 not Miriam though his sister might be allowed so much as to whisper against Moses but straight a cloud a terrour and a kindling of the Lord's anger Num. 12.8 How is it that ye were not afraid to speak against my servant Moses So true is that of Zach. 2.8 He that toucheth you toucheth the apple of mine eye God will not endure a whisper nor a muttering nor the breath of an unsavoury mock to come near his Anointed Now if not the highest if not Dathan nor Corah nor Miriam nor Aaron may open their lips against Moses how much lesse the son of * Lev. 24.11 Shelomith one of the meanest of the people If neither Nabal 1 Sam. 25.10 1 Sam. 15.3 nor Achitophel nor Absalom may speak evil of David 1 Sam. 15.31 how much lesse * 2 Sam. 16.7 Shimei a Benjamite or * 2 Sam. 20.1 Sheba the son of Bichri How ill befits it to hear the worst revile the best base Thersites to rail upon royal Agamemnon Acts. 19.16 Demetrius the Silver-smith to mutter against venerable Paul John 3.10 Diotrephes a pragmatical Sophister to prate against Saint John Ignorance to deprave Learning Rudenesse Experience Youth to censure Age illiterate Idiots to teach reverend Prelates the off-scouring of the Rabble the scumme of the Rout to belch against God's Anointed the Head of the Princes of the Tribes of Israel Proh dolor Quis talia fando temperet à lacrymis What eyes can hold water what eares endure the hearing Intolerable this Abuse doubtlesse but especially intolerable in two sorts of men the worst and the best The worst in regard of their meannesse provoking indignation and the best in regard of their eminence easily gaining belief In the former sort it argueth desperate Presumption in the latter sort Envie and Malice siding with Ambition For Shimei to reproch David brings certain vengeance on Shimei 1 King 2.46 be David never so merciful For Achitophel to whisper against his Soveraign brings unavoidable ruine upon Achitophel 2 Sam. 17.13 and upon Absalom missled by his Councel 2 Sam. 18.14 be David never so low driven Now though great the sin of both yet greater Achitophel's as one able to doe more mischief one to whom more credit is given one more obliged and in his Master's bosom able by revealing his secrets more to weaken him and by his wisdom to manage armies against him fouler in Achitophel then in Shimei And so it is in all Courtiers of the King's Family in whom is fulfilled Psal 41.9 The man that did eat of my bread hath lifted up his heel against me And fouler yet 1 Kings 1.7 if Abiathar should fall off and side with the despisers of David in his old age drawing a scandal on the Priesthood to boot and seducing numbers under colour of Religion Certainly let bold Levites the sons of Thunder that love to make the Pulpit a School of Rebellion pretend what they will no warrant have they from Heaven to traduce the Lord 's Anointed And so much greater is their crime by how much more it concerns them to disswade all men from such things It is not the example of Nathan reproving David 2 Sam. 13.9 nor of Elias threatning Ahab 1 Kings 21.21 nor of Daniel terrifying Belshazzar Dan. 5.23 will bear them out nay whe they can shew power to discover Secrets as Nathan did to doe Miracles as Eliah to foretell things to come as Daniel then let them be bold with Princes as they were Meanwhile look here upon S. Paul S. Paul that had greater Commission then they can pretend any that could doe as much as Elias or Daniel yet here acknowledging he went too far against Ananias The case is worth insisting on a little and the order of our Division now leads us to it None may speak evil of Rulers no though he be S. Paul Why Did not S. Paul speak evil Was not his answer to Ananias a plain Curse with a Contumelie to boot God shall smite thee Is not that a Curse Thou whited wall Is not that a Contumelie The standers by thought it so who presently took up the Apostle Revilest thou God's High Priest And we do not hear S. Paul denying that he reviled but rather that he knew whom he reviled I wist not brethren that he was the High Priest So an offence if it were in him it was for lack of knowledge as he saith elsewhere of his persecution of the Church I obtained mercy because I did it ignorantly 1 Tim. 1.13 But then may Ignorance excuse in such a case or can it be thought indeed that Saint Paul was ignorant so as not to know the High Priest S. Paul that was bred at the feet of Gamaliel expert in all Laws and Customes among the Jews he to be such a stranger to his own Nation as not to know who ruled the Synagogue Yes 'T is likely saith Calvin the Apostle knew what the Jews called Ananias But because the High-Priesthood of Aaron was now expired 't was void and rested in Christ therefore S. Paul answers like one that knew not Ananias nor his Authority intimating him but a private man And therefore no such peril in reviling one who was now no Ruler of the people But this had been a worse scorn then the other and had S. Paul discovered any such meaning he had much more incensed the standers by whom now he pacified and therefore in likelihood carried not himself as one that meant to bereave Ananias of any honour but to excuse himself rather in not discerning his honour he appeared therefore as one repenting and craving pardon as if he should say Had I known him to be the High Priest I would