here by devoured them took away their Breath in a moment From which Expression the Hebrew Doctors conclude that when any body was condemned to be burnt it was not to be consumed to Ashes but only exanimated by the Fire because this is called devouring or burning here in this place See Gamera Sanhedrim cap. 7. n. 1. And they died before the LORD Fell down dead in the House of God Which may seem too great a Severity till it be considered how reasonable and necessary it was to inflict a heavy Punishment upon the first Transgressors of a Law concerning a Matter of great moment to deter others from the like Offence Many instances of which there are in Scripture Some observed by St. Chrysostom upon VI Psal 2. where he gives this account why the Man who gathered a few sticks upon the Sabbath-day was adjudged to be stoned as Blasphemers were because it was a very heinous thing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. as soon as a Law was enacted immediately to break it which made it necessary it should be thus severely punished to strike such a Terror into others that they might not dare to do the like Which was the reason he observes of the sudden Death of Ananias and Sapphira mentioned Acts V. Isidore of Peleusium hath made the same observation Lib. I. Epist. 181 and goes so far back as to our first Parents who were dreadfully punished for a seemingly small Offence because they were the first Transgressors The same others have observed of the punishment of Cain who committed the first Murder of the filthiness of Sodom of the Idolatry of the Golden Calf the Covetousness and Sacriledge of Achan the Disobedience of Saul the first King of Israel the sudden Death of Vzzah who was the first that presumed to touch the Ark of God Ver. 3. Verse 3 And Moses said unto Aaron To satisfie him in the Justice and Wisdom of this dreadful stroke at which he could not but be extreamly afflicted This is that the LORD spake saying I will be sanctified in them that come nigh me To come nigh unto God is in the holy Language to perform the Office of a Priest XIX Exod. 22. XVI Numb 5. who having the honour of attending upon the Service of the Divine Majesty were bound to approach into his Presence with the greatest Reverence We do not read indeed those very words which Moses here recites in the foregoing Books But as many things were spoken to them which are not recorded so the sense of these words are in the place forenamed XIX Exod. 22. and the reason of them in XXIX Exod. 43 44. where the Tabernacle being said to be sanctified by the Divine Glory and the Priests being sanctified to minister unto him therein which was seven days a doing as we read here VIII 35. they were plainly taught to draw nigh to God with a holy Fear and to do nothing rashly nor without order from him For God being peculiarly known by the Name of the Holy One i. e. who hath incomparable Perfections such as no other Being hath he justly required to be accordingly worshipped sutable to his most surpassing Greatness by peculiar Rites of his own prescribing in a different manner from all other Beings It was for instance below his Emenency or rather Supereminent Majesty to have common Fire such as they imployed in their Kitchins used for the burning Sacrifice upon his Altar And in like manner all other parts of his Service were in reason to be performed after such a fashion as might signifie their sense of the peculiar Excellencies of the Divine Nature who therefore sent Fire from Heaven as only fit to burn perpetually upon his Altar And before all the people will I be glorified This may be thought to be but a solemn Repetition of what was spoken before as the manner is in these Books to deliver the same thing twice in different words Or the meaning is if they who draw nigh to me will not sanctifie me I will vindicate my own honour by such Punishments as shall openly declare to all that I am the Holy One. Thus God is said to be honoured upon Pharaoh by drowning him in the Red-sea XIV Exod. 4. And Aaron held his peace Silently adored the Justice of the Holy One and did not complain of his Severity For this doth not seem to be the effect meerly of great Grief but of great Reverence to the Divine Majesty Ver. 4. Verse 4 And Moses called Mishael and Elzaphan the sons of Uzziel the uncle of Aaron It appears from VI Exod. 18. that Vzziel the Father of Mishael and Elzaphan v. 22. was the younger Brother of Amram the Father of Aaron and consequently Aaron's Uncle And said unto them Come near and carry your brethren All near Kindred are called Brethren in Scripture And these Cosin Germans of theirs are appointed to carry them out because Aaron's other Sons were now attending upon God in their Ministration upon the Day of their Consecration But without this special order these two Persons could not have been admitted to come near into the very Sanctuary being not of the Family of Priests though of Kin to him From before the Sanctuary See v. 2. Out of the Camp For anciently they buried not in their Cities but in the Fields adjacent to them XXIII Gen. 9 17. and so they did in after times XXVII Matth. 7. and VIII Luke 27. where the Tombs are plainly intimated to be without the City Ver. 5. Verse 5 So they went near There being two Accents upon the Hebrew word for draw near the Cabbalists from thence observe I know not upon what grounds that these Men did not come into the very Sanctuary where the dead Bodies lay but drew them out with long Poles and those of Iron being afraid of the Fire wherewith Nadab and Abihu had been killed or rather fearing to go into the Sanctuary or too near it See Hackspan's Cabala Judaica n. 58. And carried them out in their Coats c. Their Linen Vestments wherein they ministred which having touched dead Bodies were no more fit to be used in the Divine Service As Moses had said As he had directed in his order which he gave them Ver. 6. Verse 6 And Moses said unto Aaron and unto Eleazar and unto Ithamar his sons These two were all the Sons that Aaron had now remaining from whom came two great Families of the Priests which in the days of David we find very numerous though more of the House of Eleazar than of the other when they were by him divided into XXIV Classes and had their Courses of waiting appointed them 1 Chron. XXIV 4 c. Vncover not your heads The Hebrew Doctors interpret it quite contrary Let not the head of your hair grow so long that is as to cover their Faces which was the custom of Mourners 2 Sam. XV. 30. XIX 4. and many other places And thus Onkelos and the Arabick Version set forth by
for Sin offered v. 14. before they could be worthy to have any Gift or Present which they made to God received by him But upon their Expiation an whole Burnt-offering was accepted v. 18. and after that followed this Sacrifice which was a Peace-offering as appears from v. 31. part of which was burnt upon the Altar part given to the Priest and the rest they themselves ate for whom it was offered that it might appear they were so far in the favour of God as to eat with him of his Meat from his Table Abarbanel hath the same observation Ver. 25. Verse 25 And he took the fat and the rump c. All this Verse likewise is there explained XXIX Exod. 22. Ver. 26 27 28. Verse 26 27 28. And out of the basket of unleavened bread c. These three Verses show that Moses exactly followed the Orders he had received XXIX Exod 23 24 25. where they have been explained Ver. 28. Verse 28 Burnt them upon the burnt-offering This shows that they were not a burnt-offering properly as I there observed but an Appendix to it They were consecrations for a sweet savour Because they were offered to consecrate and sanctifie them as this is explained XXIX Exod. 33. See there Ver. 29. Verse 29 And Moses took the breast and waved it c. According to the direction given XXIX Exod. 26. where it is also ordered that this should be Moses his part Ver. 30. Verse 30 And he took of the anointing oil and of the blood that was upon the Altar and sprinkled it on Aaron c. See XXIX Exod. 21. where it appears plainly this blood that was mixed with the Oil was the Blood of the Ram of Consecration Ver. 31. Verse 31 And Moses said unto Aaron and his sons Boil the flesh at the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation and there eat it c. God having had his part v. 28. and Moses who performed the Office of a Priest at this time having had that which belonged to him on that account v. 29. the rest was given as the manner was in Peace-offerings to those for whom the Sacrifice was offered that is all but the right shoulder which was burnt upon the Altar and the Wave-breast which was given to Moses as Priest See XXIX Exod. 31 32. Ver. 32. Verse 32 That which remains of the flesh and the blood shall ye burn with fire See XXIX Exod. 34. This shows it was of the nature of a Peace-offering VII 15 17. Ver. 33. Verse 33 And ye shall not go out of the door of the Tabernacle in seven days c. For till then their Consecration was not perfected as the following words signifie no more than the Consecration of the Altar was till a Bullock had been offered to cleanse it and make an atonement for it seven days together See XXIX Exod. 35 36 37. This was to make them more sensible of the great weight as well as dignity of their Office Ver. 34. Verse 34 As he hath done this day so the LORD hath commanded to do to make an atonement for you Every day of these seven those Sacrifices were to be repeated the Sin-offering the Burnt-offering and the Peace-offering and their Garments were to be sprinkled with the Blood and the Anointing Oil as the LORD required when Moses was with him in the Mount XXIX Exod. 35. This shows the imperfection of all the Legal Sacrifices which would not have been so often repeated if they had been of greater efficacy Yet the continuance of them seven days doth signifie the compleat Consecration of these Priests according to the Rites of those times In conformity to which our great High-Priest the LORD Christ who was perfected by one Sacrifice of himself spent seven days in his Consecration to his Office For as Aaron is commanded to attend at the Tabernacle so many days together in like manner our LORD Christ as Dr. Jackson observes in the forenamed Book Chapt. XXV did attend the Temple five days one after another before his death See XII John 1 12 c. XXI Matth. 8 9 c. and having purged it on the first or second of those days from the prophaneness that was exercised in it by Merchandizing and afterward hallowed it by his Doctrine and by his Divine Presence which appeared in several miraculous Cures he went the sixth day into his heavenly Sanctuary into Paradise it self to puririsie and sanctifie it with his own Blood as Moses at Aaron's Consecration did the material Sanctuary and Altar with the Blood of Beasts And having rested the seventh day finished all by his Resurrection early the next day in the morning Ver. 35. Verse 35 Therefore shall ye abide at the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation Where all things mentioned in this Chapter had been done and were still to be repeated v. 3 4. for they could not go into the Sanctuary till they were compleated Day and night This was to make their Consecration more solemn and taken notice of by all the People Seven days By which means a Sabbath as the Jews observe passed over their heads without which they conceive Aaron and his Sons could not have been compleated But the Sabbath of the LORD did never so exactly pass over any High-Priest in his Consecration as it did over the High-Priest of the New Testament For however it were of Aaron's it was to our blessed Saviour as the fore-named Dr. Jackson notes a Day of Rest indeed after six days of Labour Watching Praying and Fasting which concluded in his bloody Death and Passion And keep the charge of the LORD That which he had now enjoyned Or rather watch the Tabernacle and his Vessels c. as they were to do in time to come The Hebrew Doctors have here raised a difficulty about the necessary Easements of Nature for which they had no convenience if they might not stir for seven days from the door of the Tabernacle and therefore they fancy there was a hole digged in the Ground for such occasions But it is more likely they were not so confined as not to be allowed this liberty and one cannot well doubt of it who considers the word Mismoroth here used which we translate keep the charge of the LORD which is a military phrase signifying the Stations and Watches kept in their turns for certain hours after which they were at liberty to attend their own Affairs Such was the charge here one may reasonably think of not departing from the door of the Tabernacle while they were upon the guard as we speak which some or other of them kept night and day in such order that while some watched others might sleep or step out about the necessary occasions of Nature That ye die not It may seem hard that they should be in peril of their Life if they omitted any of these Rites But this was necessary to make those serious and intent upon their business who were to save the Lives of
as much as if he had continued in it So Mr. Selden observes out of the Misna L. II. de Synedr cap. 15. n. 14. According to the sin of the people In the manner before-mentioned Or as R. Solomon interprets it if he hide any thing from the People whereby they err For so the words run in the Hebrew if he sin to the guilt of the people or to the making them guilty either by misinforming them or drawing them into Error by his Example so that they take a thing to be clean which is indeed unclean or the like Then let him bring for his sin which he hath sinned a young bullock without blemish It is observed by some that in great Offences the Sacrifices were small lest they should imagine their Pardon was procured by their great expence For here the word is Par ben bachur a young Bullock that was but a little bigger than a Calf And so this Sacrifice is called Par in the following Verses Whereas that of the Peace-offering is called v. 10. Shor an Ox though we translate it also Bullock one that was grown to its full bigness and consequently of greater value For a sin-offering How Chattah which we translate Sin-offering differs from ascham which we translate Trespass-offering I shall examine afterward when Moses comes to speak of the latter And now only observe that Chattah is the name both for Sin and for the Sin-offering as the word piaculum was among the Heathen which signified both a great Crime and the Expiatory Sacrifice for it By which those words in the New Testament may be explained Christ was made sin for us that is a Sacrifice to expiate our sins And so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sin certainly signifies VIII Rom. 3. Ver. 4. Verse 4 And he shall bring the bullock unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the LORD This as I take it was to be done by himself who was to present the Sacrifice to the Divine Majesty and desire it might be accepted for the purpose to which it was to be offered And shall lay his hand upon the bullocks head As every one that brought other Offerings were bound to do See ch I. 4. III. 2 c. but here for another purpose viz. to confess their sins unto the LORD and beseech him to forgive them See V. 5. There is a good Gloss upon this in a very bad Book called Nitzachon not long ago published by the Learned Wagenseil where that Author saith p. 11. When a Man sacrificed a Beast he was to think in his mind I am more a Beast than this here present For I have sinned and for the sins I have committed I offer this but it were more just that he who hath sinned should suffer death than this Beast which hath not offended Therefore thus a Man by the help of this Sacrifice began to repent And kill the bullock before the LORD This seems to have been done by him that laid his hand on the head of the Bullock that is by the High-Priest himself For the greatest Men in old time did not think such work below them but rather esteemed every thing that served to the Worship of God to be noble and honourable So Homer represents King Agamemnon as killing the Lambs himself by the Blood of which he was to Seal the Treaty he made with the Trojans Iliad 3. yet in this case it is likely the High-Priest himself did not kill the Sacrifice but some of the other Priests that then ministred For he that did this seems to be distinguished by the next words v. 5. from the Priest that is anointed i. e. the High-Priest Nor was this Sacrifice killed in the ordinary place where Sin-offerings were killed See 24. being an extraordinary sort of Offering as that which follows also was Ver. 5. Verse 5 And the Priest that is anointed Whosoever killed the Sacrifice the High-Priest himself for whom it was offered did what follows Shall take of the bullocks blood In a Basin And bring it to the Tabernacle of the Congregation Into the very Sanctuary where as it follows he was to dip his finger in the Blood and sprinkle it seven times before the LORD Ver. 6. Verse 6 And the Priest shall dip his finger in the blood Or rather dip it into the blood And sprinkle of the blood seven times before the LORD This was peculiar to his Sacrifice for Sin and done in no other but that for the whole Congregation To signifie perhaps that their Offences were more heinous and could not be so easily expiated as those of other Men. The number seven every one knows was of great account and thought most powerful in Religious Actions even among the Heathen For as Elisha bad Naaman go and wash seven times in Jordan to cure him of his Leprosy so Apuleius in the beginning of the XIth Book of his Metamorphosis speaks of dipping the head seven times in the Sea for Purification and gives the reason for it Quod eum numerum praecipuè religioni aptissimum divinus ille Pythagoras prodidit because the Divine Pythagoras as he calls him taught this number to be above all other most proper in Religion Which in all probability Pythagoras learnt from the truly Divine Moses to whom God revealed the Creation of the World in six days and his Consecrating the seventh day on which he rested which made the number seven so much used in Sacred Matters For not only in this Sacrifice but in making the Water of Separation by burning a red Heifer this Rite was used XIX Numb 4. and in purging a Leper XIV Lev. 7. in dedicating the Altar XXIX Exod. 37. when the Oil was sprinkled on it seven times VIII Lev. 11. and at the Consecration of the Priests XXIX Exod. 35. and to say no more as every seventh day of the Week was holy so every seventh year the Land rested and after Seven times seven there was a Jubilee XXV Levit. They that would see more of this number and of its Sacramenta as St. Hierom speaks may read him upon V Amos 3. and Drusius on this place and on VI Josh 4. And Wolfius upon Nehemiah VIII Before the vail of the Sanctuary Which parted the holy place from the most holy For that is peculiarly called by the name of Parocheth which is the word here used XXVI Exod. 31 33 35. XVI Lev. 2 c. as the other Vail which was before the Door of the Tabernacle is constantly called Masach XXVI Exod 36 37. Ver. 7. Verse 7 And the Priest shall put some of the Blood upon the horns of the Altar of sweet incense c. This also was peculiar to his Sacrifice and to that for the whole Congregation v. 17. And shall pour out all the blood of the bullock That is all the rest of the Blood which remained after the sprinkling before the Mercy-seat and the tipping of the Horns of the Altar with it At the bottom of
others by making Expiation for them when they deserved to perish For so I am commanded These Orders as hath been already observed he received in the holy Mount So Aaron and his sons did all things which the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses This was necessary to be added that all Generations might be assured whatsoever was performed by their Ministry would be effectual to the end for which it was appointed they being exactly Consecrated to God's Service without the least omission of any thing that he had required In like manner our great High-Priest was Consecrated to his Eternal Priesthood by fulfilling all the Will of God and that in a far more Solemn and Publick way than Aaron's was it being performed by Suffering such things as nothing but a perfect Filial Obedience to his heavenly Father could have moved him to admit because it was accomplished by shedding his own Blood in a lingring Death CHAP. IX Ver. 1. Verse 1 AND it came to pass on the eighth day He doth not mean on the eighth day of the Month but on the next day after their Consecration which was seven days in doing VIII 33 35. Then it was that the Fire fell down from Heaven and consumed the Sacrifice which Aaron offered and this seems also to have been the first day of unleavened Bread which fell upon the fifteenth day of this Month for on the fourteenth in the Even which was the last day of the Consecration of the Priests the Passover was kept IX Numb 2 5. That Moses called Aaron and his sons and the Elders of Israel Just as he had done before VIII 2 3. that the Rulers and as many of the People as could meet together to behold what was done might see the Glory of the LORD which appeared at this time v. 6. Ver. 2. Verse 2 And he said unto Aaron take thee a young Calf This is the first Sacrifice that was offered to God by the Priests of the Order of Aaron It differed from that which was offered by Moses for Aaron and his Sons as Egel a young Calf doth from Par a young Bullock by which his Sin was expiated at his Consecration And Maimonides saith that the former signifies a Calf of one year old the latter one of two Others say a Calf was called Egel till his Horns budded and then it was called Par. For a sin-offering For his sins in general not for any determinate Offence like that IV. 3. which therefore was something different from this The Jews fancy that a young Calf was appointed for the first Sin-offering to put Aaron and the People in mind of the Golden Calf which they worshipped So Maimonides reports the Opinion of their Wise men in his More Nevoch P. III. cap. 46. Where he also hath this conceit that it was to expiate that Sin And a Ram for a burnt-offering For none but Males were accepted for Burnt-offerings I. 10. There is no Peace-offering ordered for him as there is afterward for the People v. 4. because it was not fit he should have all the Sacrifice as he must have had according to the Law of such Sacrifices being both the Priest and the Offerer between whom and the Priest after the Fat was burnt all was to be shared Ver. 3. Verse 3 And unto the Children of Israel thou shalt speak saying Unto all the Elders v. 1. who were to bring the following Offerings in the Name of all the People of Israel and that by Aaron's direction who was now to act as God's High-Priest and gave out this Order Take ye a Kid of the Goats for a sin-offering The Hebrew word Seir signifies a He-goat Concerning which Maimonides in his Book concerning Sacrifices delivers this opinion That all Sacrifices for sin whether of private Persons or the whole Congregation at their three principal Feasts New Moons and the Day of Expiation were He-goats For this reason because the greatest Sin and Rebellion of those times was that they sacrificed to Daemons who were wont to appear in that form For which he quotes XVII 7. They shall no more offer their Sacrifices lasseirim which we translate unto Devils but the word Seirim is but the Plural Number of the word Seir which signifies a Goat And further he adds That their Wise men think the Sin of the whole Congregation was therefore expiated by this Kid of a Goat because all the Family of Israel sinned about a Goat when they fold Joseph into Egypt XXXVII Gen. 31. And such reasons saith he as these should not seem trifles for the end and scope of all these Actions was to imprint and ingrave on the Mind of Sinners the Offences they had committed that they might never forget them According to that of David LI Psal 5. My sin is ever before me This Sin-offering was different from that IV. 14. being not for any particular Sin as that was but in general for all the Offences that the High-Priest might have committed A Calf and a Lamb both of the first year c. When they were in their prime Ver. 4. Verse 4 Also a Bullock and a Ram. These also were no doubt to be without blemish as is prescribed in the two foregoing Offerings And the Hebrew word Sor which we translate a Bullock often signifies a well grown Ox as in XXI Exod. 28. XXV Deut. 8. As Ajil a Ram the Hebrews say signifies a Sheep of above a year old These made very large Peace-offerings and consequently a liberal Feast upon them For peace-offerings The very same order is here observed that was at Aaron's Consecration First Sin-offerings then a Burnt-offering and then a Peace-offering was offered to the LORD VIII 14 18 22. And a meat-offering mingled with oil Which was to compleat the Peace-offerings on which they were to feast that Meat might not be without Bread to it For to day the LORD will appear to you Give you an illustrious Token of his Presence by sending Fire from Heaven or from the Brightness of his GLORY to consume the Sacrifice v. 23 24. Whereby they were all assured that both the Institution of this Priesthood and the Sacrifices offered by it were acceptable to the Divine Majesty Ver. 5. Verse 5 And they brought that which Moses commanded Both Aaron v. 2. and all the Congregation v. 3. brought all the Offerings which Moses required Before the Tabernacle of the Congregation Where these Sacrifices were to be offered And all the Congregation drew near and stood before the LORD Approached to the door of the Tabernacle and stood there by their Sacrifices looking towards the Holy Place and worshipped the LORD Ver. 6. Verse 6 And Moses said Unto the Congregation This is the thing which the LORD commanded that ye should do I require this of you by the commandment of God who will demonstrate by a visible Token his Presence among you And the glory of the LORD shall appear unto you That Glory which filled the Tabernacle when it was erected
be put in execution at the Evening Sacrifice v. 9. of that Chapter Which is a sufficient Reason to incline one to think that the Celestial Fire now came as I have supposed at the Evening Sacrifice and consumed the Burnt-offering Which when all the people saw they shouted They fled not from it as Men affrighted but shouted for joy or as Abarbanel's phrase is they lifted up their voices with singing and prayed to God or rather praised him Just as they did when the Fire came down at the Consecration of Solomon's Temple When the people saw it they praised the LORD saying for he is good for his mercy endureth for ever 2 Chron. VII 3. And fell on their faces Worshipped God with humble Thankfulness who hereby testified his Presence among them and his gracious Acceptance of them For thus he had of old showed his Respect to Abel IV Gen. 4. and to Noah VII 20. and to their Father Abraham whose Sacrifice was thus accepted in the Evening when the Sun went down XV Gen. 17. And there was great reason that both Priests and People should rejoyce at this sight For as the Author of the Book Cosri discourses Pars III. sect 53. if a Man look only at the foregoing part of the Work of this day the killing of the Sacrifices the Blood running about their hands their slaying of them washing the Entrails rinsing the Pieces of the Flesh sprinkling the Blood laying the Wood in order kindling the Fire they would rather set his Mind further off from God than draw it near to him till after all these things performed orderly he saw the Fire coming down from Heaven testifying God's gracious acceptance of the Sacrifice or felt another Spirit excited in him beyond any thing he was acquainted withal before or had Divine Dreams or Heroical Motions which he believed were the Effects of what he had been doing c. And no doubt all good Men in future Ages felt their Minds raised by the thoughts that the Sacrifices they offered were as acceptable to God as that offered at this time being consumed in some sort by the same Fire which burnt continually on this Altar and after this day was never extinguished till the Captivity Which seems to be the Original of that Expression of the People in their Prayer for their King That God would remember all his Offerings and accept turn to ashes it is in the Hebrew his burnt Sacrifice XXI Psal 3. Such acceptable Sacrifices St. Cyril tells Julian we Christians still offer but infinitely better being Spiritual and Intellectual and consequently nearer to the Divine Nature and that by Fire sent from Heaven viz. the Holy Ghost of whom this Fire was but a Figure 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 illustrating the Church and inabling the Members of it to offer continually the sweet smelling Sacrifices of Faith and Hope and Charity and Righteousness Temperance Obedience perpetual Doxologies and all other Vertues L. X. contr Jul. CHAP. X. Ver. 1. Verse 1 AND Nadab and Abihu the sons of Aaron His two eldest Sons VI Exod. 23. Took either of them his Censer Here are two of their Errors expressed in these words if Abarbanel conjecture aright who supposes this to have hapned on the last day of their Consecration when Fire came down from Heaven First That they adventured without any order from God to go and burn Incense in the Sanctuary For though this did not belong to the Office of the High-Priest alone yet upon this Solemn Day Aaron only was commanded to perform the whole Service as upon the Day of Expiation IX 7. And this account Bochartus gives of their Offence that sine vocatione thus obtulerunt they offered Incense without any call to it Hierozoic P. I. L. II. cap. 49. p. 557. And secondly both of them went about this Work whereas the Incense was to be offered only by one and not by two at a time Procopius Gazaeus adds a third Error that they attempt this out of the due season for it which was only in the Morning and Evening And put fire thereon As the Priests were required to offer no strange Incense XXX Exod. 9. so in all reason they were to think it was not to be offered with strange fire but only with a Coal from that Altar where there was a fire kindled by God himself And offered strange fire before the LORD Here are two sins more if Abarbanel take it right that they brought Fire from another place without the Sanctuary and did not take it from the Altar and then that they attempted to go into the most holy place which he thinks is signified by these words before the LORD The first of these is the Opinion also of Aben-Ezra and other learned Men among the Jews who by strange fire understand fire that did not go out from before the LORD IX 24. that is was not taken from the Altar of Burnt-offering where Fire from Heaven lately consumed their Oblations And so R. Bechai They imagined that the Fire on the Altar of Burnt-offerings was only for consuming Sacrifices and therefore they fetcht some from without for the burning Incense But as to the second thing it doth not seem to me probable for Aaron himself had not yet gone into the Holy of Holies Which he commanded them not This they did saith Aben-Ezra from their own proper Motion and Opinion without any Authority from God for whose order they should have waited if his Mind was not already sufficiently declared as it was fully afterwards XVI 12. How two such excellent Men as these who had had the honour to be called up to God when he appeared on Mount Sinai and to have a sight of him and to eat and drink in his Presence XXIV Exod. 1 9 10 c. came to be so rash and to fall so unadvisedly into so great an Error as this here mentioned cannot be certainly resolved But it seems to me highly probable that at the Feast upon the Peace-offerings they had eaten and drunk too liberally which made them forget themselves and fall into this gross mistake For I can see no other reason why that Command v. 8. of not drinking Wine or strong Drink when the Priests were to go into the Sanctuary is annexed unto this story of their Death and Burial but only this which I have now alledged that their Miscarriage arose from drinking too much Wine before this Office was to be performed Ver. 2. Verse 2 And there went out fire from the LORD As they were entring into the Sanctuary or as they stood at the Golden Altar ready to offer Incense Fire came out from the most Holy Place where the Glory of the LORD was and struck them dead And devoured them It did not reduce their Bodies to Ashes nor so much as burn their Clothes v. 5. but they were killed as Men sometimes are with Lightning which penetrates into the Vital Parts and puts a sudden end to their Life That 's meant
Erpenius and many of the Jewish Commentators such as R. Solomon and Aben-Ezra who give the same account of XXI Lev. 10. where the same thing is required of the High-Priest And the time of their letting their Hair grow on such occasions they determine by the Law of the Nazarites who were not to cut their Hair all the time of their Vow of Separation which the Jews say was at least XXX days VI Numb 5. Therefore the Priests were not to let their Hair grow so long if they did they were uncapable of officiating Only they make this difference between the common Priests and the High-Priest that this Law did not bind the Priests at all times but only in their Course of Ministration but the High-Priest whose Presence was always necessary in the Sanctuary might never let his Hair grow but was bound every Week to have it cut even on the Eve of the Sabbath See Selden L. II. de Success in Pontiff cap. 6. But the foundation of all this is not very strong for it relies chiefly on the use of the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place of Numbers VI. 5. where it signifies Hair from whence they conclude the Verb here may have the same Notion and signifie the growth of Hair But this is not the usual signification of it in Scripture where it commonly imports the rejection of something as of good Counsel I Prov. 25. of Reproof or Instruction XIII Prov. 18. XV. 32. And being joyned with the Head plainly signifies the uncovering it See V Numb 18. And therefore so the LXX understand it here as if they were forbidden to put off their Bonnets But that they always did as soon as they had performed their Sacred Office in the Sanctuary and therefore it may be meant of making their Heads bare by shaving them or bald by pulling off the Hair as the manner was in Mourning XV Isa 2. XLI Jer. 5. XLVIII 37. and many other places And in this the Priests among the Jews directly opposed those among the Egyptians who shaved their Heads as appears by what Minutius Faelix and Lampridius in the Life of Commodus say concerning the Priests of Isis And Herodotus also in his Euterpe whose words are these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In other places the Priests of the Gods nourish their hair but in Egypt they are shaved Neither rend your Clothes Which was another Rite of Mourning not only among the Jews but among all People in ancient Times especially in the Eastern Countries as every one knows that hath read any of their Authors See I Job 20. And it was used on many other occasions among the Jews as well as in their Funerals particularly when any Man blasphemed XIV Numb 6. 2 Kings XIX 1. when any ill Tidings came which put them into a Passion 2 Kings V. 7. or any Misfortune befel them XLIV Gen. 13. XI Judg. 35. But was thought so unseemly in a Priest especially when he ministred that the Jews say they whose Garments were rent by accident were as uncapable of ministring as they who rent them themselves in Mourning The reason of this Precept was as R. Levi of Barcelona well observes Praecept CLV that it being not allowed in those Countries for Mourners to come into the Presence of their Kings as appears by the History of Esther much less was it seemly for any that attended upon the Divine Majesty to come into his House in such a Habit. Lest ye die As Nadab and Abihu did For after such a Monition as this they had highly dishonoured God if they had appeared in his Sanctuary in such an indecent manner And wrath come upon the people For want of Priests to make atonement for them when they offended But let your brethren the whole house of Israel bewail the burning which the LORD hath kindled He doth not prohibit the rest of the People who were not Priests to mourn for them but rather requires it of them all that they might be sensible of their loss and of the the sin which was the cause of it And it is likely the People bewailed them by rending their Clothes and baring their Heads and putting Ashes upon them or some such Rites then in use among them Ver. 7. Verse 7 And ye shall not go out from the door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation For it is supposed the seven days of their Consecration were not yet quite ended VIII 35. or they had begun some other Ministration in the Sanctuary and therefore were not to stir out of the Court of it till it was sanctified And the Hebrews think this Law did not only bind Aaron and his Sons at this time but their Posterity for ever that if they heard of the death of any of their Kindred when they were ministring in the Sanctuary they should not stir from their Duty For that would have been to show a greater affection to a dead Friend than to the living God This appears to be true by the like command to this and in the same words laid particularly upon the High-Priests XXI 12. For the anointing of the LORD is upon you You are devoted and consecrated by a Solemn Unction VIII 10 c. to the Service of God which must not be omitted out of respect to any Person whatsoever For in this Precept as R. Levi Barcelonita observes Praecept CLVII the Dignity and Majesty of the Divine Worship was consulted which if his Ministers had deserted on such occasions for a moment would have been brought into contempt For it would have been a declaration that there was something in the World more to be regarded than God's Service And therefore the punishment of Death is threatned in the foregoing words to those who were guilty of such an offence And they did according to the word of Moses Staid in the Tabernacle without any of the usual Tokens of Mourning Wherein they performed an eminent piece of Obedience to God whose commandment suppressed those natural Affections which are very hard to be kept in subjection Ver. 8. Verse 8 And the LORD spake unto Aaron saying It may be thought that the LORD was so pleased with his Obedience that he himself now spake unto Aaron whereas hitherto he had spoken to him by Moses Ver. 9. Verse 9 Do not drink wine nor strong drink thou nor thy sons with thee By Wine every one knows is meant that Liquor which is pressed out of Grapes And by Schechar which we translate strong Drink is meant such Liquors as were made in imitation of Wine of Dates or Figs and many other sorts of Fruits also that which was made of Honey which we call Mede and Metheglin There are many sorts of such Liquors mentioned by Pliny in his Natural History Lib. XIV cap. 16. which he calls Vina factitia When ye go into the Tabernacle of the Congregation To perform your Ministry At other times they might drink Wine and if we may believe the Jews they did not
polluted to come unto his Sanctuary For there were so many sorts of Pollutions made by the Law that it was very hard to avoid falling under some of them and consequently a business of great care circumspection and labour to approach as they ought into the Divine Presence For if a Man escaped defilement by a dead body yet he could not easily avoid being defiled by some of the eight creeping things which he might chance to tread upon or might fall on his Meat or his Drink And if he escaped these yet he might be defiled involuntarily by the means mentioned here v. 16. or by touching a menstruous Woman or one that had a Flux of Blood or at least by touching their Bed their Seats or something belonging to them c. All which kept a Man from the Sanctuary which he could not enter therefore when he pleased but was to stay a certain time before he could be admitted to worship God there and not then neither till he had washed himself By all which actions reverence affection and devotion was preserved to the Sanctuary and Men were excited to great humility which in this was principally regarded Ver. 32. Verse 32 This is the law of him that hath an issue c. In this and the next Verse he recapitulates the Matter of this Chapter as he did in the latter end of the foregoing sum up the Contents of that Ver. 33. Verse 33 And of him that hath an issue of the man and of the woman Even of the Person that hath an issue whether it be Man or Woman c. CHAP. XVI Ver. 1. Verse 1 AND the LORD spake unto Moses after the death of the two sons of Aaron This Chapter would have naturally followed the Tenth Chapter where the death of those two Persons is related if that had not occasioned the inserting some other Laws about Uncleanness See Preface to Chapter XI which being delivered Moses now goes on to give direction about the great Sacrifice in which the whole Nation was concerned as he treated of lesser and common Sacrifices in the beginning of the Book When they offered before the LORD and died See X. 1. This is mentioned again to make the Priests careful not only to Sacrifice unto the LORD alone but after such a manner as he ordered Ver. 2. Verse 2 Speak unto thy brother Aaron that he come not at all times into the holy place within the vail Into the holy place without the Vail he or some of the other Priests were bound to go every day Morning and Even when they offered Incense But into this as none of them might go at all so he not at all times when he went into the other but only upon one particular occasion which is mentioned here in this Chapter Before the Mercy-seat which is upon the Ark. This being the place of God's special Presence none might enter into it but his principal Minister and he no oftner than the Divine Majesty allowed which was only once a year it appears from v. 29. when he offered the great Sacrifice here prescribed And so much was intimated to Moses before XXX Exod. 10. And the Jews add That on this day of the year he might go in but four times once to burn Incense a second time to sprinkle the Blood of the Bullock then to sprinkle the Blood of the Goat and lastly to fetch out the Censer wherein he burnt Incense If he went in a fifth time he died for his presumption as they say particularly R. Levi Barcel Praecept CCLXXXVI Such sacred places the Gentiles had in some Countries which according to this pattern were opened only once a year Particularly Pausanias mentions in his Book Boeotica the Temple of Dindymene which they thought it was not lawful to open more than one day in the year 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the same he saith of another in the same Book and in his Eliaca of the Temple of Orcus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. It is opened once every year See Dr. Owtram's excellent Book De Sacrificiis Lib. I. cap. 3. Lest he die As his Sons had done for their Presumption in offering with other fire than God allowed In the like danger Aaron himself had been if he had come into the Divine Presence without his leave and without such caution as is given v. 13. which is the reason of this order here delivered to Moses and by him to Aaron for the prevention of any such dangerous mistake For I will appear in the Cloud upon the Mercy-seat That was God's own Dwelling-place where his GLORY appeared into which therefore none might enter but when he appointed and as he directed The only difficulty is what is meant by the Cloud wherein he saith he will appear on the Mercy-seat One would think he meant as usually the Cloud wherein the Divine Glory resided XL Exod. 34 35. 1 Kings VIII 10 11. But the Cloud seems to have been on the out-side of the Tabernacle and within a Glory or great Splendor only unclouded And therefore most I think understand this of the Smoak of the Incense that the High-Priest burnt when he entred into the most holy place which was the Cloud wherewith the Mercy-seat was then covered v. 13. And there is great reason for this Opinion for if there had been a Cloud in the most holy place over the Mercy-seat before the High-Priest entred what need had there been to make a new Cloud of Smoak as he is ordered v. 13. when the Divine Glory was sufficiently obscured already Besides in the place before-mentioned XL Exod. the Cloud as I now observed is said to be without the Tabernacle and to cover it the Glory only being within and in the other place of the Book of Kings and 2 Chron. V. 13 14. it is said only to fill the House of the LORD i.e. the Body of the Temple but not to be settled upon the Mercy-seat Where we may very well doubt whether there was any Cloud or no but only the Divine GLORY The only ground that I can see for it is that God is said there to dwell in thick darkness which seems to import that the Divine GLORY was wrapt up in a Cloud But however that be expounded these words which we here translate I will appear in the Cloud upon the Mercy-seat may very well be rendred I will be approached in a Cloud i. e. of Incense For so this word we translate appear is used XXIII Exod. 15. not for God's appearing to them but for the Peoples appearing before him and this sense the 13th Verse seems to inforce as Campegius Vitringa hath observed Lib. I. Observ Sacr. cap. 11. Ver. 3. Verse 3 Thus shall Aaron come into the holy place As he might come into it only once a year so then with such preparation and in such a manner as is here prescribed And the Jews say that he was separated from his own House and Family seven days before and
Cloth was tied to the Gate of the Temple and if it turned white when the Goat was sent away as they pretend it usually did there was great joy among the People because it was a sign their sins were forgiven according to that of the Prophet I Isa 18. Though your sins be as scarlet they shall be white as snow c. But if it did not change its colour into white they hung down their heads and were full of sorrow they looking upon it as a Token of God's anger Which I relate only for this purpose that I may take notice how the same Authors who tell this story confess that for forty years before the destruction of the second Temple that is from the time of our Saviour's death this shred of Cloth never changed its colour at all Which if it be true was a notable Token of the Wrath of God coming upon them for their crucifying the LORD Christ Ver. 23. Verse 23 And Aaron shall come into the Tabernacle of the Congregation All that the High-Priest did about the Scape-goat was performed at the Door of the Tabernacle of the Congregation where he laid his hands upon him and confessed over him all their sins See v. 20 21. which being done and he having sent the Goat away he is now ordered to come into the Sanctuary it self And shall put off the linen garments which he put on when he went into the holy place See v. 4. The Jews say there were two sorts of white Garments which he wore on this day One in the Morning which were made of fine Linen of Pelusium which was a third part of greater value than those he wore in the Evening which were of Indian Linen Now here he speaks only of the Garments that he wore in the Morning wherein he had hitherto officiated but is ordered after he had done all this to put them off there being many other things to be still performed upon this day yea he was to go once more into the holy place in order to which he put on other Garments as will appear in what follows And shall leave them there Never to be used more either by him or by any body else But they were laid up when they were left and new ones made against the next year as the Gemara upon the third Chapter of Joma relates And the same is affirmed by Maimonides R. S. Jarchi and others mentioned by Braunius L. II. de Vest Sacerd. cap. 25. n. 9. R. Levi Barcelonita also gives the same Exposition of it Praecept 99. and see Mr. Selden Lib. III. de Synedr cap. 11. p. 143. Ver. 24. Verse 24 And he shall wash his flesh with water in the holy place Either in the Laver which stood in the outward Court or in a Room in the Tabernacle which in after time was called Happervah where the Priest they say washed himself upon this day every time he changed his Garments And this agrees well enough with the words of Moses which here follow that when he had put on his Garments he should come forth that is from this Chamber to perform such Offices as are after mentioned The end of this washing in this place seems to have been that he might purifie himself after he had touched the Goat which bare all their iniquities v. 21. as the Man that carried him into the Wilderness was to wash after he had done that business v. 26. Though others will have it that it was in token he had now finished the Expiation Certain it is here is another washing distinct from that mentioned v. 4. when he put on the white Garments Which in part justifies what the Misna saith in Joma cap. 3. sect 3. that the High-Priest washed five times upon this day all in the House Happervah except the first which could not be in the Court of the Tabernacle because he was to wash before he entred into it For there were five Ministeries to be performed upon this day at each of which he changed his Garments and between every Ministry when he changed his Garments he washed himself There is a long Discourse about this and about washing his hands and his feet in Torah Cohanim quoted by our learned Country-man Mr. Sheringham in his Annotations upon Codex Joma p. 57. c. which they endeavour to ground upon the very words of this Verse Now as the leading of Christ into the Wilderness upon the Day of Atonement was fore-shadowed by the Ceremony of the Scape-goat so his Baptism on the same day was as expresly fore-shadowed or prefigured as any event concerning him either was or could be by the Legal Ceremony here mentioned of Aaron's washing his Body in the holy place They are the words of Dr. Jackson in Christ's Answer to John's Question sect 64. where he endeavours to make out this And put on his garments Viz. His other Garments wherein he officiated upon other days which the Jews call his golden Garments to distinguish them from the white Garments which alone he wore when he went into the most holy place And the Jews call by this name of golden Garments all the eight Garments of the High-Priest four of which were common to him with the lower Priests and were made only of Linen yet they never call them by the name of white Garments which they appropriate to those in which he went into the most holy place the other four which gave the name to all the rest were proper only to the High-Priest himself viz. the Robe which had Bells of Gold at the bottom the Ephod the Breast-plate and the Golden-plate upon his forehead which being put over the other four common Garments made him appear as if he were all clothed in Gold For they either consisted of solid Gold as the Plate on his forehead or had solid Gold appendant as the Robe had or had Gold interwoven as the Ephod and the Breast-plate Now he put on these after he had put off the Linen Garments mentioned v. 4 23. which were never used but when he ministred in the Holy of Holies where he did not appear with the Breast-plate of Vrim and Thummim and the rest of the golden Garments as some learned Men have imagined particularly Corn. Bertram in his Book de Republ. Hebr. cap. 7. where he saith Hujus Sacerdotis erat semel in anno adytum sanctuarij adire indutus ipso Ephode It belonged to the High-Priest to go once in the year into the most secret place of the Sanctuary clothed with the Ephod Which is directly contrary to v. 4. of this Chapter But many other great Men have fallen into the same mistake See J. Braunius de Vestitu Sacerdot Hebr. Lib. II. cap. 20. n. 29. cap. 25. n. 9 10. And come forth From the place where he put on his golden Garments unto the Altar of Burnt-offerings And offer his burnt-offering and the burnt-offering of the people I take this for the daily Evening Sacrifice which usually was
are threatned to be cut off if they did not observe this Law Ver. 10. Verse 10 And what man soever he be of the house of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn among you See v. 8. That eateth any manner of blood This is forbidden before III. 17. and repeated again VII 26. See both those places where it is explained what Blood he means either of Birds or Beasts Nothing is said of Fishes because they were not offered at the Altar and have little Blood in them nor is there any direction given any where how they should be killed It is said indeed in this place that they should not eat any manner of Blood but the meaning seems to be neither of Blood offered at the Altar nor of Beasts killed for their own use Or else it is to be limited as before to the Blood of Beasts and Birds v. 13. for Fishes were not at all considered And here the reason is added why they should not eat Blood which was not mentioned in the fore-named places because it was the Life of the Beast and was therefore reserved to make Atonement for their Souls I will even set my face against that soul c. That is be extreamly angry with him and severely punish him by cutting him off as it here follows from the Body of the Nation Maimonides observes in the fore-named place More Nevoch P. III. cap. 46. that this is the same Expression which is used against him that offered his Children to Moloch XX. 3. and that this phrase is never used in Scripture concerning any other sin but only these two Idolatry and eating Blood For the eating of Blood gave occasion he shows to one kind of Idolatry in the worshipping of Daemons whose Food the ancient Idolaters imagined the Blood was by eating of which their Worshippers had Communion with them See XVI Psal 4. and Grotius there Ver. 11. Verse 11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood and I have given it to you upon the Altar to make an atonement for your souls c. Some think here are two distinct Reasons against eating of Blood but the words as they lie in the Hebrew may well be translated Because the life of the flesh of any Beast that is is in the blood therefore I have given it to you or appointed it for you upon the Altar to make an atonement c. Which is as much as to say The Life of the Beast lying in the Blood I have ordained it to expiate your sins that by its death in your stead your life may be preserved and therefore I require you not to eat that which is appointed for so holy an end For it would have been very unseemly if they had vulgarly used that to which they owed the favour of God and their very Lives Nothing could be more rational than this Precept viz. That a thing so sacred as to be peculiarly appointed for them upon the Altar should not lose that honour and esteem that was due to it As the Blood would have done if it had been allowed to be commonly eaten for that is very contemptible which goes into the Draught as our Saviour speaks and at last becomes Ordure For it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul The Blood that is of the Sacrifices which by God's appointment are offered to expiate your sins that is to preserve you from perishing For to make an Atonement and to be a Ransom are the very same thing as appears from XXX Exod. 12. compared with v. 15 16. And to be a Ransom is to deliver from Death as appears from the words in that place they shall every Man give a Ransom for his Soul unto the LORD that there be no Plague among them For the sins of the Sacrificer being laid upon the Beast which he offered by imposition of his hand on its Head and confessing them there they were taken away by the Blood of that Beast unto which they were translated And that not meerly by the Obedience of him that offered the Sacrifice which the followers of Socinus say God accepted but by the Blood of the Sacrifice it self as these words expresly declare which was offered in his stead Thus Theodoret upon these words God commanded the Soul of the Irrational Creature with its Blood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. to be offered instead of thy Rational and Immortal Soul And thus the Jews themselves understand it particularly Aben-Ezra upon these words saith the Soul instead of the Soul i.e. the Soul of the Beast was offered instead of the Soul of the Man And R. Solomon Jarchi to the same purpose One Soul comes and makes Expiation for another Soul And Maimonides more largely I have spared the Soul of the Man and given this Blood upon the Altar that the Soul of the Beast may make Expiation for the Soul of the Man And so Abarbanel and many more which may be seen in Dr. Owtram's most learned Book De Sacrificiis Lib. I. cap. 22. n. 11. Ver. 12. Verse 12 Therefore I said unto the Children of Israel No soul of you shall eat blood neither shall any stranger that sojourneth among you eat blood What other reason soever there was before for not eating Blood See IX Gen. 4. this is the reason why God forbad it to the children of Israel and to all that joyned themselves unto their Religion Ver. 13. Verse 13 And whatsoever man there be of the Children of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn among you which hunteth and catcheth any Beast or Fowl that may be eaten Though no other Beasts or Fowls be mentioned but those that were taken in Hunting that being a very common thing in those days yet the Precept extends to all those that were bred at home and were allowed by the Law for their Food So a MS. Author mentioned by J. Wagenseil in his Annotations upon Sota cap. 2. excerpt Gemarae n. 6. where he puts abundance of Cases upon this Subject He shall even pour out the blood thereof and cover it with dust Though it was not the Blood of a Sacrifice offered at the Altar but of a Beast or Bird killed for their own use they might not eat it but bury it in the Ground lest any Beast should lick it up as it is commonly interpreted Maimonides hath found a deeper reason for this which is That no Body might meet and feast about it By which means Moses broke their Society and Fellowship with Daemons who in those times were thought to feed upon the Blood in a Bowl or Hole whilst their Worshippers sate about it eating of the Flesh So he writes in the place often before-mentioned More Nevoch P. III. cap. 46. And this was the more necessary while they remained in the Wilderness because Daemons were wont to haunt such places and there appear but not in Cities or habitable Places See Mr. Selden Lib. II. de Synedr cap. 4. p. 201. If a Man
freedom given her Not intirely but in part redeemed and consequently her Freedom not absolutely granted to her She shall be scourged If she had been perfectly free both he that lay with her and she her self should have been put to death XXII Deut. 23 24. But being not fully free and consequently not fully his Wife who had espoused her it was not reckoned Adultery and therefore punished only with scourging See Selden Lib. V. de Jure N. G. cap. 12. p. 613. And Maimonides I observe thus expounds it of a Woman that was not a meer Servant and yet not compleatly free but between both More Nevoch P. III. cap. 41. But whereas we mention here in the Text the Scourging only of the Woman in the Margin it is rightly noted that the Hebrew words are There shall be scourging viz. of them both as the Vulgar Latine with great reason understands it And the Hebrew word Bikkoreth properly signifies scourging with Thongs made of a Bulls or Oxes Hide as Bochartus observes in his Hierozoicon P. I. Lib. II. cap. 28. cap. 33. n. 8. They shall not be put to death because she was not free Her Master not having set her quite at Liberty her Marriage was not compleat which freed her from suffering Death though some Punishment she deserved because it was begun Ver. 21. Verse 21 And he shall bring his Trespass-offering unto the LORD unto the door c. Which was not enjoyned her because she had not wherewithal to offer for her Expiation all she had being her Masters and not her own A Ram for a Trespass-offering Which was the proper Sacrifice in such a case V. 17 18. Ver. 22. Verse 22 And the Priest shall make an atonement for him with the Ram of the trespass-offering She needed an Atonement as well as he being equally guilty in consenting to the Fact and being espoused to another seems to have had a greater guilt upon her and therefore was left in a lamentable condition without any publick assurance of God's pardon For his sin which he hath done Which had so much guilt in it that besides the punishment he suffered in being Scourged this Satisfaction was to be made to God And the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him By virtue of the Sacrifice which would not have been accepted if she had been perfectly a Free-woman but the sin would have cost his own life and hers also XXII Deut. 23 24. Ver. 23. Verse 23 And when ye shall come into the Land and shall have planted all manner of Trees for food The Precept is so general that the boldness of R. Zerika is unaccountable who would have it understood only of the Vine which if it be not cut its Grapes are not so large nor the Wine so good nor fit to be offered at the Altar c. as his opinion is represented in Pirke Elieser cap. 29. But Moses expresly mentioning all manner of Trees for food there is no colour for this limitation and a very good account may be given of this Prohibition if we have respect only to natural reason For young Trees grow better if they be stript of their Fruit the Juice of which is waterish and unconcocted having neither pleasant smell nor taste as Nachmonides observes and therefore not fit for Food and upon that score not fit to be offered as the First-fruits to God But besides all this Maimonides affirms there was an Idolatrous custom among the Zabij to which this Law of Moses may reasonably be thought to be opposed For they imagined all Trees would be blasted or their Fruit fall off whose First-fruit was not part of it offered in their Idol Temples and the other part eaten there as their Children they thought would not thrive unless some of them passed through the fire And therefore God commanded his People to forbear to eat the Fruit of any Tree till the fourth year and not doubt of the fruitfulness of their Plantations though they did not Consecrate the Fruit of the years foregoing after the manner that the Gentiles did More Nevoch P. III. cap. 37. where he observes some Trees brought forth Fruit in one year some not till the second and others not till the third according to the different ways wherein they were planted Ye shall count the fruit thereof as uncircumcised That is as unclean and therefore to be cast away as the Foreskin was Three years it shall be as uncircumcised to you it shall not be eaten of And therefore they pluckt off the Buds when they put forth that they might not grow into Fruit or if any by chance did they threw it away as unfit for food But this is meant only of such Fruit-trees as they planted after they came to Canaan not of such as they found already planted there And it was the same thing whether he planted them himself or bought an Orchard or Vineyard c. of another Israelite or had it left him as an Inheritance or bestowed on him as a Gift the three first years the Fruit was not to be used Ver. 24. Verse 24 But in the fourth year all the fruit thereof shall be holy to praise the LORD withal It was to be offered as the First-fruit to God and eaten by the Priests which as Maimonides saith in the Book forenamed cap. 49. was to excite them to Liberality and give a check to their Appetites as well as to Covetousness Yet there are those who say this Fruit of the fourth year was to be eaten by the Owners before the LORD at Jerusalem when his dwelling was settled there as they eat the second Tythe So R. Levi Barcelonita Praecept CCXX shows at large And they observe many Benefits which the Israelites received by this means not only in exciting their Thankfulness to God but their Love to that Holy Place unto which some of their Family might conceive such an affection as to settle there and learn the Law Ver. 25. Verse 25 In the fifth year shall ye eat of the fruit thereof that it may yield unto you the increase thereof He would not have them think that they should lose any thing by staying till the fifth year for the Fruit of their Trees but promises them here that by forbearing so long their Trees should be the more exceeding fruitful I am the LORD Who bestowed this Land upon them to hold of him by what Tenure he pleased by whose Blessing they might expect to receive the Increase thereof abundantly without the help of such wicked Arts as Maimonides says the Zabij used Who letting certain things lie till they were putrified and when the Sun was in such or such a degree sprinkling them about the Trees which they had planted with certain Magical Ceremonies they fancied Flowers and Fruits would be produced sooner than they could have been without these practises Ver. 26. Verse 26 Ye shall not eat any thing with the blood This is an admonition as R. Levi Barcelonita fancies Praecept
a plain Law that whosoever cursed his Father or Mother should die XXI Exod. 17. from whence they might justly infer he was to be so punished who cursed his heavenly Father there being also another Law against those that reviled the Judges and Rulers XXII Exod. 28. And therefore I take it they only doubted what kind of death he should die about which Moses consulted the Divine Majesty Ver. 13. Verse 13 And the LORD spake unto Moses saying It 's likely Moses went into the Sanctuary to enquire of God who from the Mercy-seat pronounced the following Sentence against him and also made a perpetual Law about this Case with some others Ver. 14. Verse 14 Bring forth him that cursed without the Camp This is the Sentence pronounced by the mouth of God from whom they expected it And first he orders the Criminal to be carried forth out of the Camp as an unclean V Numb 2 3. nay an accursed thing VII Josh 24. And let all that heard him Next he orders the Witnesses to be produced who heard him speak the blasphemous words Lay their hands upon his head This was a peculiar thing in this Case Hands being laid upon no Man's head condemned by the Sanhedrim but only upon a Blasphemer By which Ceremony they solemnly declared that they had given a true testimony against him and thought him worthy of the Death he was condemned to suffer And perhaps prayed God that all the punishment of this Sin might fall upon this Man and not upon them nor the rest of the People And so the Jews tell us their manner was to say Let thy blood be upon thy own head which thou hast brought on thy self by thy own guilt And let all the Congregation stone him This was the last part of the Sentence that when they that heard him Curse had taken off their hands all the Congregation should stone him Which is the same Punishment the Law inflicted on him that cursed his Father or his Mother XX. 9. See there Ver. 15. Verse 15 And thou shalt speak unto the Children of Israel saying Upon this occasion a new Law is made in express terms against Blasphemy Whosoever curseth his God Some of the Hebrews understand this of a Gentile who lived among them and was not yet solemnly made a Proselyte of the Gate that if he cursed the God which was worshipped in his Country he should die for it See Selden Lib. II. de Jure Nat. Gent. cap. ult And Procopius Gazaeus extends the words to such Persons as cursed the God they worshipped though he were a false God Which is according to the common Rule of the Talmudists that where we find these words isch isch man man which we well translate whosoever they comprehend Gentiles as well as Jews But no doubt this Law particularly concerned the People of Israel whom God intended by this Law to preserve from such horrid impiety as is here mentioned Shall bear his sin Be stoned See XX. 9. If the word curseth be understood in the proper sense Procopius well observes that nothing could be more sensless than this Sin and upon that account deserved stoning for he that curseth his God upon what God will he call to confirm his curse But the Hebrew words seems to import only speaking contemptuously of God Ver. 16. Verse 16 And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD shall surely be put to death c. It is uncertain whether this be an higher degree of the Sin mentioned in the foregoing Verse or only a repetition of the same Law with a more express declaration of the punishment he should bear for his sin The Jews unreasonably understand it of him alone that expressed the Name i. e. the most holy Name of God as they say in Sanhedrim cap. 7. num 5. where Joh. Ã Coch observes out of the Hierusalem Targum on XXXII Deut. that it is thus explained Wo unto those that in their Execrations use the holy Name which is not lawful for the highest Angel to express But this is a piece of their Superstition the meaning undoubtedly is That if any Man reproached the most High he should die for it but the meer pronouncing his holy Name could be no Crime when Men might swear by it though not take it in vain VI Deut. 13. XX Exod. 7. All the Congregation shall certainly stone him As they were ordered to do with the present Offender v. 14. As well the stranger as he that is born in the Land c. By Stranger may be meant a Proselyte like the Egyptian whose Offence was the occasion of this Law But the Jews extend it to Samaritans and Gentiles only they say such were to be punished by the Sword and not by Stoning Ver. 17. Verse 17 And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death This Law was given before XXI Exod 12. And it is not easie to give an account why it is here repeated after the Case of a Blasphemer Perhaps it was upon the occasion of the last words in the foregoing Verse As well the stranger as he that is born in the land when he blasphemeth the name of the LORD shall be put to death For after the following Laws they are repeated again as a general Rule v. 22. that no Man might think it hard a Stranger should be punished for Blasphemy as much as an Israelite when in other Cases the same Judgment passed upon them both Procopius Gazaeus thinks a Murderer is joyned with a Blasphemer because they have the same mind and intention the one desiring to destroy God if it were possible as the other doth his Neighbour Therefore the Law puts them together just as on the contrary when it commands the love of God it couples with it the love of our Neighbour So he Ver. 18. Verse 18 And he that killeth a beast shall make it good beast for beast It was not incongruous as the same Procopius speaks to annex unto the Law against Murder a Law against other Injuries And concerning this see XXI Exod. 33 34. For the Hebrew word Behemah here used signifies such domesticktame Beasts as are there mentioned Ver. 19 20. Verse 19 20. If a man cause a blemish in his neighbour as he hath done so shall it be done to him c. This Law concerns only free Persons not their Slaves and hath been explained XXI Exod. 24 25. Ver. 21. Verse 21 And he that killeth a beast he shall restore it and he that killeth a man he shall be put to death This is a short repetition of the two first Laws here mentioned v. 17 18. to make them the more regarded Ver. 22. Verse 22 Ye shall have one manner of law as well for the stranger as for one of your own Country In these and in all other Cases as well as Blasphemy v. 16. you and the Stranger shall be judged by one and the same Law For I am the LORD your God Who will neither favour