their time of rest during this three dayes journey Perer. But when they removed from the wildernesse of Sinai they went three dayes together without any stay the Arke still going before them to find out a resting place Numb 10.13 till they came to Kibroth Hatavah which was their next mansion place Numb 33.16 The Lord still animating and strengthning his people to go forward Iunius The third manner of staying was when the cloud remained still upon the Tabernacle two or three dayes and then they pitched their tents and thus the cloud staied in 40. yeere not above 42. times for so many mansion or camping places they had as they are set downe Numb 33. 4. Now how to know when they were to pitch their tents Pererius conjectureth at it and giveth these three rules First if the cloud stayed about noone then they knew that it onely rested till they had refreshed themselves but if it staied in the afternoone before night that they journeyed no more that day they tooke it that then they were to stay there some while and so pitched their tents But if it made no stay till the evening they pitched no tents till the next morning and then if the cloud went not forward they then set up their tents These are onely Pererius conjectures and uncertaine And it otherwise may be gathered out of the Scripture that they did not pitch their tents till the cloud had staied two dayes at the least as we read Numb 9.20 When the cloud abode a few dayes in the Tabernacle they pitched their tents at the commandement of God and afterward vers 22. If the cloud tarried two dayes or a moneth or a yeere upon the Tabernacle the children of Israel pitched their tents It seemeth then by this that this was a rule unto them not to pitch their tents or settle their campe till after two dayes Beside they had Moses to give them direction also in this case when to encampe themselves who continually consulted with God 5. Now the manner of their removing was this when the cloud arose from the Tabernacle the Priests and Levites tooke up the Arke and carried it and when they went forward with the Arke Moses used this prayer Rise up O Lord and let thine enemies bee scattered and let them that hate thee flee before thee And when the Arke rested hee said Returne O Lord to the many thousands of Israel Numb 10.35 Hereunto the Prophet alludeth when hee saith The Lord shall arise and his enemies shall be scattered Perer. 6. This cloud began not onely now to appeare when they were come to their third mansion place in Etham as Hierome thinketh but straightway upon their setting forth from Ramesis though mention be made first of it here that proveth it not now first to have appeared as Moses is said first in this place to have taken Iosephs bones with him which was done notwithstanding at his first comming out of Egypt the Scripture observeth not alwayes the order of time in setting downe matters of historie but the coherence of the argument So neither did the cloud leave them at Aarons death as is the opinion of the Hebrewes for seven moneths after Aarons death who died in the fift moneth immediatly before Moses death when Iosuah was consecrated to succeed him mention is made of the piller of the cloud wherein the Lord appeared to Moses Deut. 31.15 See more of this quest 22. before 7. Gregorie maketh the appearing of the bright cloud by day a signe of Gods favour and mercie to his obedient people and the appearing of the terrible fire by night as a signe of his severitie and justice against the wicked and unbeleevers Gregor hom 21. in Evangel Ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the lawfull use of ceremonies Vers. 9. THis shall be as a signe unto thee upon thine hand c. As this place sheweth that there were then in the Church and so are still commendable ceremonies which the Lord hath instituted to be â—â—membrances of spirituall things as these were of their deliverance out of Egypt so their superstition is reproved that dwell in the externall ceremony not looking unto the spirituall sense Ferus as the Pharisies did which did weare their phylacteries and fringes yet forgot the law represented and signified by them 2. Doct. Christ the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament Vers. 21. IEhovah went before them He that is here called Iehovah is chap. 14.19 called the Angell of God which was none other but Jesus Christ Iun. the Prince and Captaine of his Church the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament according as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.9 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also is for ever 3. Doct. Christ sheweth us the way to the heavenly Canaan as the piller did direct the Israelites toward their Canaan Vers. 22. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of fire This piller divers wayes represented Christ 1. He is the piller and upholder of his Church 2. He leadeth us the way unto eternall life as he himselfe saith I am the way the truth and the life Ioh. 14. 3. Aperit nobis viam maris rubei id est gratiam baptismi sanguine suo rubentes He openeth to us the way of the red sea that is the grace of baptisme died red in his bloud Rupertus 4. Christ is both a fire and a cloud that is both God and man 5. In noctâ— veteris testamenti paucis lucebat c. He did shine but to a few in the night of the old Testament as this fierie cloud gave light by night Ferus 6. But the most lively signification is this that Christ is that covering cloud under whose shadow wee are defended from the heate and stormes of temptation as the Prophet sheweth Isai. 4.6 Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the theatricall Pagean of the Masse Vers. 9. THey shall be a signe unto thee upon thine head These externall signets upon the head and frontlets betweene the eyes instituted at the first to a good end to put them in minde alwayes of the law of God they afterward superstitiously abused onely glorying in the outward ostentation of them so in Poperie the right use of the Supper of the Lord is turned into theatricum quâ—ndam actum Missa into a theatricall shew of the Masse calling men à communione ad spectaculum from the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ to a gazing spectacle Simlerus 2. Conf. Against the adoration of reliques Vers. 19. MOses tooke the bones of Ioseph This maketh nothing for the adoration of the reliques of Saints which idolatrous use is still retained and practised in Poperie for Iosephs bones were carried to be buried they tooke up the bones of Saints and Martyrs after they have beene buried these were true bones they shew counters and ducks bones and such like trash for the bones of the Saints as hath beene found by
and smoke by day and the shining of flaming fire by night c. and a covering shall be for a shadow in the day for the heate c. Isai. 4.5.6 QUEST XX. How this cloud differed from other clouds THis piller of the cloud was much differing from all other cloudes 1. In respect of the substance it was cleere and lightsome not darke and thicke as other cloudes are 2. It was in figure and shape as a piller the nether part thereof descending unto the Tabernacle the upper part reaching aloft unto heaven whereas other cloudes descend not as low as the earth 3. It alwayes kept this figure and fashion of a piller whereas other cloudes doe alter and vary in shape and appearance 4. This cloud moved of it selfe whereas other cloudes are moved by the wind and of themselves have no motion this way or that way but only as they ascend and goe up in vapors but this cloud both ascended and descended 5. Other cloudes are made of naturall causes as of vapors and exhalations but this cloud was raised by the Lord beside the ordinarie course of nature 6. The effects were divers for other cloudes are apt to engender raine and drop downe moisture but this was not ordained for that end but to shew them the way in going before them 7. This cloud differed in motion from all other cloudes for they are carried all one way with the wind this sometime went forward when the camp removed sometime it came backe and stood upon the Tabernacle it went sometime to the right hand sometime to the left according as the journies of the people were appointed out 8. The motion of it was alwayes certaine it went before the campe as they were able to endure to follow whereas other cloudes are carried swiftly that they cannot bee followed 9. The situation of it was divers not carried aloft as other cloudes which can be no direction to leade a man in his journey but this cloud was of such equall distance as it did part out their way before them like as the starre that guided the Wise men appeared below in the aire to conduct them Matth. 2.10 Lastly whereas other cloudes are not durable but are soone dissipated and dissolved by the wind and weather this cloud remained firme and so continued for the space of 40. yeeres Ex Perer. QUEST XXI· When the cloud began first to appeare BUt concerning the time of the first and last appearing of this cloud it is not like as Hierome thinketh that it went not before them till they came unto the third station in Etham because mention is first made of it there 1. For they had need as well before of a guide to direct them the way as afterward and therefore it is like that they had this direction in their first setting forth out of Egypt 2. As it is in the Psalm He made his people to goe out like sheepe and led them in the wildernesse like a flocke Psal. 78.52 where the Prophet alludeth unto the fashion of those countries where the shepheard goeth before and the sheepe follow after as our Saviour saith in the parable Ioh. 10.27 So the Lord went before his people as a shepheard in the cloudy and fierie piller even when he brought them out of Egypt 3. The Prophet Esâ—y also alluding unto this cloud saith That upon every place of mount Sion and the assemblies thereof shall be a cloud Esay 4.5 So that hence it may be gathered that the Israelites in every place and in all their assemblies and campes had the presence of this cloud 4. Then like as the Wise men saw the starre that brought them to Christ in the beginning of their journey as they say Wee have seene his starre in the East and are come to worship him Matth. 2.2 they first saw the starre and then came forth so it may bee thought that the Israelites saw this cloud in their first setting forth 5. The people had need to have had all encouragement in their first going forth and to be animated in their journey and therefore it is like that the Lord did at the very first shew these comfortable signes of his presence QUEST XXII When the cloud and fiery piller ceased ANd as the cloud appeared not so late as Hierome supposeth so neither was it taken out of their sighâ— so soone as the Hebrewes imagine for they say that after Aarons death who died on the first day of the first moneth in the 40. yeere after their departure out of Egypt Numb 33.38 the piller of the cloud and of the fire were no more seene and their reason is because that after that time no more mention is made of them Contra. First this is no sufficient reason for neither is there mention made of them a good while before 2. The words of the text are against their opinion for it is said That the Lord tooke not away the piller of the cloud by day nor the piller of fire by night from before the people Vers. 22. So then as long as they had need of this direction the Lord failed them not 3. Seeing the use of these pillers was to leade them the way that they might goe by day and by night it is like so long as they were in the way and travelled in the wildernesse they had the presence of the cloud the same cause remaining the meanes are like to have beene still continued But from the mount Hor where Aaron died untill they came to the plaine of Moab in the borders of the land of Canaan there were many solitary desert and waste places thorow the which they passed for divers of their stations were yet behind as appeareth Numb 33. that they had after they came from Mount Hor eight severall stations therefore it may well bee gathered that as they had the direction of the cloud in their other stations so also in these Perer. 4. Then like as the starre left not the Wise men till it had brought them to the very house where the holy 〈◊〉 was Matth. 2. So we may judge that the cloud left not the Israelites till they came into the land of Canaan whither the Lord intended to bring them QUEST XXIII Of the foure great miracles which the Lord wrought for the people in the desert THis extraordinary leading of the people by the going before of the piller of the cloud and fire was one of the great miracles which the Lord wrought for his people in the desert for as foure things are chiefly necessary for those that travell strength and health of body foode rayment and a guide so the Lord in every one of these wrought wonderfully for them 1. Their feete did not swell for the 〈◊〉 of forty yeeres Deut. 8.4 And of all that great multitude there being not so few in all as 2000. thousand seeing the third part of this number even 600. thousand were fighting men above twenty yeere old there was not one feeble
verse the negative particle lo not must be supplyed which is but once in the beginning of the verse expressed This interpretation we preferre before either that of the Hebrewes 1. who referre this verse to that which followeth and joyne it not with that which goeth before but make this sense that as yet there were no plants or herbs that appeared above the earth but lay yet hid till God sent raine whereby the earth was prepared for the creation of man and the plants watered so R. Sel. But this is a vaine conceit for upon the third day trees were made which appeared above the earth and the earth having beene so lately covered with the waters was yet moist enough 2. Either that of Eugubinus who saith it rained the second day and then the plants were brought forth the third for upon the second day the waters were gathered together from covering the earth so that no raine was then needfull 3. Mercerus distinguisheth the times the 5. verse hee understandeth of the first growing of the plants in the creation which was done without raine or dew but the 6. verse hee referreth to that ordinary course which God appointed afterward by dewes and raines to refresh the earth 4. Musculus will have the 6. verse of the ascending of vapours to be understood of the very time of creation that God used those helps of nature but this were to tye God unto meanes wherefore I take it with Iunius to be an explanation of the former verse that it had neither yet rained nor any mist had ascended when God onely by his word caused the plants to grow out of the earth this is the exposition of R. Saadia which Kimâ—i preferreth before all the rest QVEST. IX Whether Paradise were terrestriall Vers. 8. THe Lord planted a garden eastward in Eden c. Hierome readeth for eastward à principiâ— from the beginning whereas the word is Kedem the East translated by the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that Hieromes conceit that God made Paradise before the heaven and earth tradit in 2. gen is grounded upon the false interpretation of this place and how could Paradise which was upon the earth be planted before the earth was founded 2. Their conceit is removed that imagine Paradise to bee no terrene or corporall place but to be spiritually understood as Philo lib. de mund opâ—fic and Origen whom Epiphanius confuteth by this reason that where there are true rivers as Euphrates which is confessed of all to bee one of the rivers of Paradise where were also very trees and plants there Paradise must bee a terrestriall place epist. ad Ioann Hierosâ—l 3. Neither can the whole earth be taken for Paradise as some have thought because it is said here to bee planted in Eden which was the name of a speciall country Esech 27.23 Harah Canneth Eden are joyned together QVEST. X. Where Paradise was situate LIkewise for the situation of Paradise 1. it was neither in a remote place beyond the Ocean which opinion is attributed to Ephrem 2. nor a place higher than all the earth Damasc. lib. 2. de fid orthodox c. 14. 3. nor next unto heaven as Rupertus de Trinitat c. 37. 4. nor reaching up to the Moone as some other have imagined 5. nor in the aire though not so high as the Moone as Alexander Hales and Tostatus 6 nor under the Equinoctiall Bonavent in 2. senten c. 17. for these rivers Tigris and Euphrates which flowed out of Paradise and the country Eden where Paradise was came not neare the Equinoctiall and they are knowne to be in Asia not in any remote and unknowne countrey in earth not in the aire or next to the Moone All these are ridiculous childish fancies and need no long confutation QVEST. XI Of the tree of life Vers. 9. THe tree of life c. 1. This was a visible tree planted in the midst of Paradise in a visible place not spiritually or allegorically to be understood as Origen thinketh 2. neither is it called the tree of life because it was able to give immortality and to preserve from death for ever as Tostatus or onely because it was able to preserve man from death till such time as hee should bee translated to immortality as Scotus in 2. lib. sent dist 19. qu. 1. and Thomas with others 4. Neither need it bee disputed whether the tree of life had this power to preserve from death by a supernaturall gift as Bonaventure or by a naturall faculty as Hugo Thomas Pererius upon this place 5. For it is evident that this tree had no power to give immortality at all by the taste of the fruit thereof 1. because that no corruptible food can make the body incorruptible but the fruit of this tree could not nourish nature without corruption and alteration and without nourishment it could not give life to the body 2. Againe man had by his creation power given him to dye if he had not sinned wherfore immortality was the gift of his creation not effect of the eating of the tree 3. And if it could have giveÌ„ immortality it must have had a power to preserve from sin for by sinning man became mortall so that if it could not defend him from sin it was no more the tree of life in regard of the effect than any other tree of the garden for if he had not sinned he should not have dyed what fruit soever he had eaten of that only tree of knowledge of good and evill excepted 6. Then our opinion is this that it was called the tree of life not so much for the operation though we confesse it might give strength and vertue also to the body Mercer but chiefly for the signification because it was both a signe of life received from God and a symbole of Christ who is our true life and herein we approve rather the opinion of Augustine Eugubinus in Cosmopeia who thinketh it was called the tree of life not effective but significative not effectually but significatively as a signe of true immortality which he should receive of God if he continue in obedience First it is the tree of life as the other was of knowledge of good and evill which was not so called because it gave knowledge but was a seale unto them of their miserable knowledge which they should get by experience in their transgression Magister lib. 3. distinct 17. therefore the tree of life must be so called because it was a seale and pledge of life secondly thus the Scripture significatively and simbolically expoundeth the tree of life Prov. 5.18 Wisdome which is Christ is a tree of life Revel 2.7 To him that overcommeth will I give to eat of the tree of life see more of this Synops 17. cont err 5. QVEST. XII Of the tree of knowledge of good and evill vers 9. THe tree of knowledge of good and evill First we affirme that this was a visible materiall tree not
not evill that Adam in abstaining from that which was good might shew his humility to his Creator 2. In that God gave Adam so easie a precept to keep only to refraine to eat of one tree having liberty to use all the rest beside not like in hardnesse and difficulty to the commandement given to Abraham to sacrifice his only sonne herein the transgression and disobedience of Adam appeared to be the greater in transgressing a precept so easie to have beene obeyed This Augustine lib. 14. de civit dei c. 15. Thirdly we answer with Tertullian that this precept though in shew but easie and light yet containeth the very foundation of all precepts and of the whole morall law for therein was contained both his duty toward God in obeying his will and love toward themselves in escaping death which was threatned if they transgressed Tertul. lib. con Iud. So that in this precept Adam might have shewed both his love toward God in his obedience faith in beleeving it should so fall out unto him if he disobeyed as God said hope in expecting a further reward if he had kept the commandement The Hebrewes here are somewhat curious as R. Isaach that if they had tasted only of the fruit and not eaten it they had not transgressed but the commandements of God doe concerne the very thought R. Levi by eating understandeth the apprehension of things spirituall which is here forbidden but we take it rather litterally and historically that God giveth them so easie a precept to try their love and obedience Mercer QVEST. XXVI How a Law is not given to a righteous man BUt the Apostle saith The law is not given to a righteous man but unto the disobedient c. 1 Tim. 1.9 And Adam was now just and righteous and therefore he needed not a law for answer whereunto I say that the law in two respects is said not to be given to a just man 1. in respect of the negative precepts as to abstaine from murther theft adultery but in regard of the affirmative precepts to retaine them in obedience and doing of good workes so the just man had need of a law and so had Adam 2. A just man need not to feare the punishment of the law as S. Paul in another place saith of the Magistrate which is the speaking or living law he is not to be feared for good workes but for evill Rom. 13.4 And in this respect so long as Adam remained in his integrity and justice the punishment in the law concerned him not 3. And a righteous man rather of a voluntary disposition than by compulsion of law yeeldeth his obedience QVEST. XXVII Why God gave a precept to Adam fore-seeing before that he would transgresse it FOurthly A question will here bee moved why the Lord gave this precept to Adam which hee knew hee would not keepe for answer whereunto first wee say that God gave him a precept which was possible to be kept and Adam had power to keep it if he would it was then not Gods fault that gave him free will but his owne that abused that gift Secondly if it be replyed why God did not give him grace and stay him from transgression I answer that God could have given him such grace and to the Angels likewise that they should not have fallen but it was fit that God should leave the creatures to their free will and not hinder the course of nature which hee had made Thirdly though God foresaw mans transgression yet that was no reason to withhold the precept for then God should neither have made the Angels nor man because he saw that some of both should bee reprobates and by the same reason God should not have given his written word because many heretikes doe pervert it to their destruction Fourthly as God foresaw mans transgression so he knew how to turne it to good as in shewing mercy to sinners and in sending Christ to restore what man had lost so that notwithstanding Gods foresight of Adams transgression he was not to forbeare to charge Adam with this commandement in regard of the great good which God also did foresee should ensue QVEST. XXVIII What kind of death was threatned to Adam Vers. 17. IN the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death The first question here moved is what death God threatneth to Adam whether the death only of the body or soule or of both 1. We neither think that the spirituall death of the soule is here only signified whereby the soule is separated by sinne from God which was the opinion of Philo Iudeus lib. 2. de allegor Mosaicis and of Eucherim lib. 1. in Genes for wee see that the Lord himselfe threatned the death of the body to Adam Genes 2.19 Dust thou art and to dust thou shalt returne 2. Neither is the death of the body here onely implyâ—d as some have thought but the death of the soule by sinne also which bringeth forth the death of the body as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 5.13 Death went over all men for as much as all men have sinned There was first sinne in the soule before there followed death in the body 3. Neither doe we think that everlasting death is here excluded as Pererius seemeth to insinuate lib. 4. in Genes qu. 4. of this matter For the Apostle saith We were by nature the children of death as well as others Eph. 1.5 by Adams transgression we were the children of wrath hee therefore much more that made us so and if Adam had not by sinning made himselfe guilty of eternall death why was the promise of the Messiah presently upon his fall made unto him Gen. 1.15 whose office is to redeeme us from sinne and everlasting damnation 4. Wee therefore thinke with Augustine that by death here is understood whatsoever death either of the soule or body temporall or eternall lib. 1. de câ—vâ—â— dei c. 12. for Augustine maketh foure kinds of death the temporall death of the soule when it is for a time separated from God by sin the eternal death of the soule when it is separated from the body the temporall death of the body when it is separated from the soule the eternall death of the body in hell So Adam first died in soule by losing his innocency he died in body returning to dust he was subject also to everlasting death both of body and soule but from that he was redeemed by Christ. 5. Beside under the name of death are comprehended all other miseries calamities and sorrowes which are the forerunners of death so that we may fitly compare death to the center all other miseries as the circle or circumference about the center or as the Scripture resembleth it death is as the burning coale other sorrowes and miseries are as the sparkles that doe rise from the coale Iob 5.7 Man is borne to travaile as the sparkes flye upward QVEST. XXIX When Adam began to die SEcondly it is
inquired when this sentence began to take place that in what day soever Adam did eat of the tree he should dye the death 1. Some thinke that a day is not here to bee taken according to mans account of dayes but as it is before God with whom a thousand yeares are but as a day and so Adam died within a thousand yeares after so Iustinus dialog cum Triph. but this sense seemeth to bee strained 2. Neither doe we refer these words in what day soever to the first clause only thou shalt eat and not to the second thou shalt dye the death as though the meaning should not bee they should dye the same day wherein they did eat but at any time after for this seemeth also to be but a forced sense 3. But we rather allow Hieromes interpretation that Adam began in the same day to dye not actually but because then he became mortall and subject to death lib. tradit in Gen. so Symmachus readeth thou shalt bee mortall 4. And beside that then actualâ—y Adam entred into misery and sorrow labour hunger thirst which are the forerunners of death 5. Adde unto this also that in the same day death entred by sinne into the soule of Adam in the very same day of his transgression QVEST. XXX Whether God made death THirdly seeing that by Gods sentence death seased upon Adam the question is whether God made death and whether this corporall death be a punishment of sin We answer 1. that as death is a defect of nature beside the first intention of the Creator brought in by sinne into the world that God is not the â—uthor of it but it is so only the fruit and effect of sinne 2. But as death is a just punishment inflicted for sinne so it is of God who though hee first made not death yet now hee disposeth of it thereby shewing his justice upon mans transgression so that as Augustine saith speaking of the beginning of darkenesse Deus non fâ—â—â—t tenebras sâ—dâ—rdinavit God made not darknesse but ordered them so may it bee said of death 3. Eugubiâ—us objecteth that death is not properly a punishment of sinne because it remaineth in the faithfull and it is not taken away by Christ. in Cosmopeia To which we answer 1. That death also at the last shal be destroyed by Christ 1 Cor. 15.26 The last enemy that shal be destroied is death 2. That although the death of the body remaine yet in the members of Christ in them it is not now as a punishment but as a consequent of their corruptible nature because all flesh is now as grasse Isa. 40.6 and death now unto them is not a curse but turned to a blessing in Christ being both a cessation from labâ—ur and an entrance into rest Rev. 14.13 Blessed are they that dye in the Lord they rest from their labours and their workes follow them QVEST. XXXI Why it was not good for man to be alone Vers. 18. IT is not good for man to be alone 1. not as R. Sâ—l left if man would have beene alone hee might be thought to be chiefe Lord in earth as God was in heaven for if man had beene alone who should have so thought or spoken 2. Neither was it not good in respect of God who by his infinite power and wisdome could otherwayes have multiplyed and increased man but in respect of that order and course of generation which God appointed for other creatures 3. Neither is this so said as though no man could live without a woman as the Hebrewes have these sayings nothing is good but a woman â—e that hath not a wife is not a man for God hath given unto some a speciall gift which may supply this want 4. Neither is S. Paul contrary to Moses where he saith it is not good to touch a woman for he speaketh in respect of those present times of persecution wherein their wives might have beene a let unto them Mercer 5. But this is so said 1. in respect of mutuall society and comfort 2. in respect of the propagation of the world 3. especially for the generation and increase of the Church of God 4. but most of all it was meet that woman should bee joyned to man because of the promised seed of the woman of whom came our Saviour Christ after the flesh QVEST. XXXII Wherein woman was a meet helpe for him Vers. 18. LEt us make an helpe meet for him The word cenâ—gdâ— signifieth as one before him or against him But we neither allow the conceit of some Hebrewes as R. Sâ—lamon that the woman is said to be against man because she is contrary to him 2. Nor yet doe wee like of Tostatus conjecture because the male and female in respect of their naturall parts are contrary 3. Nor yet doe wee approve David Kimchi his collection that the woman is said to bee as before man that is as a servant to attend vpon him for shee is appointed to bee his fellow-helper not his servant neither is it like that if shee had beene ordained to any base use or service that she should have beene framed out of Adams side 4. Therefore shee is called a helpe like to man as Hierome readeth or according to him as the Septuagint or as before him as the Hebrew both because shee was made like unto man as well in proportion of body as in the qualities of the mind being created according to the image of God as also for that she was meet for man necessary for the procreation education of children and profitable for the disposing of houshold affaires 5. This maketh a manifest difference betweene woman which is alwayes before man cohabiting and conversing with him and other females which after their copulation forsake their males Luther QVEST. XXXIII When the woman was formed A Further doubt is moved by some at what time the woman was made where 1. wee reject the conceit of Cajetanus who making an allegory of this story of the framing of the woman out of Adams side is forced to affirme that God made man and woman together upon the sixth day and not the woman out of the man for thus the history of Moses is called into question and as well may the whole discourse of the creation of the world be allegorised as this narration of the making of woman And again it is contrary to the Apostle who saith that the woman was of the man 1 Cor. 11.9 2. We likewise refuse the opinion of Catharinus who thinketh the woman to have been made the seventh day for this also is contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 In six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth the sea and all that in them is 3. So then we hold that the woman was made of a rib out of Adams side as Moses setteth it downe neither made together with him out of the earth nor yet made so long after him upon the seventh day but she was formed upon the sixâ—h day
Hebrew ach to be read as an adversative as Paulus Burgensis readeth veruntamen notwithstanding as though the sense should be this though yee are permitted to shed the bloud of beasts yet it is unlawfull for you to shed the bloud of man 3. Neither is this another exception concerning mans food as Cajetane that as before the bloud of beasts is excepted so here humane flesh that if it be not lawfull to shed the bloud of man neither is it to eat his flesh which first must be kiâ—led before it be eaten 4. Neither need there to be here understood any sentence as this I will not have you to shed mans bloud and then this to follow as a reason for this prohibition to shed mans bloud followeth directly in the next verse 5. But this word translated for may be read as a causall why God would have them abstaine from all cruelty or savage behaviour in eating of the bloud of beasts that they should have a greater detestation of the spilling or shedding of mans bloud Perer. Mercer QVEST. VII How God will require the bloud of man at the hand of beasts Vers. 5. AT the hand of every beast 1. Rupertus by beast understandeth the Devill that shall answer for the death of mens soules but Moses here directly speaketh of the bodily life which is in the spirits and bloud 2. Neither by beasts here are understood cruell and beastiall men for it followeth afterward aâ— the hands of man will I require it c. 3. Neither doth Moses insinuate the death of martyrs which were exposed to beasts for which the persecutors shall answer for that did cast the Saints before the beasts 4. But here is shadowed forth that Law which was afterward published that even the beast that killeth a man should be stoned Exod. 22. QVEST. VIII How his bloud shall be shed that sheddeth bloud Vers. 6. BY man shall his bloud be shed 1. Some reade in homine and referre it to the first clause Hee that sheddeth mans bloud in man as they which are strangled have their bloud shed as it were in them sic Tostatus but in this sense one kinde of murther onely should be prohibited 2. Some read in homine against man that is in despite of man Cajetan 3. But the best reading is per hominem by man and to referre it to the last clause by man shall his bloud be shed that is by the Magistrate as the Chalde interpreteth by witnesse by the sentence of the Iudge for it should seeme that before the floud there was no law made nor power given to man to punish murther as Adam proceeded not against Cain that killed his brother Abel Mercer 4. And this must be understood not de facto sed de jure merito not of the fact for many times murtherers escape but of the right and due desert of murtherers that they are by Gods Law worthy of death and many times where the law of man faileth that such are not executed Gods vengeance overtaketh them such are either slaine in battell or by the hands of other or by some other meanes as it is in the Psalme men of bloud shall not live halfe their daies Psalm 55.24 Calvin QVEST. IX That mans life should be preserved because of Gods image IN the image of God c. 1. Hence it followeth not as Oleaster collecteth that the image of God is in mans body because the image in the soule cannot be by the killing of the body destroyed for the reason concludeth well though this image of God be not in the body yet because the body is the Tabernacle of the soule and beareth that which beareth the image of God it ought for that cause to be reverenced and yet the image of God though not originally or principally yet by the consequent and effects is expressed and shineth in some sort in mans body in that it is made upright and aspiring to celestiall things and so sutable to the soule and in regard that into the hand of man God hath delivered the rule and dominion of the creatures cap. 1. vers 28. 2. Though the image wherein man was created be much decayed and impaired yet some part thereof remaineth for the which the life of man should be spared and preserved Calvin 3. And if for this reason the life of any man whatsoever should be regarded much more the life of Christians in whom this image is renewed in Christ Muscul. QVEST. X. Of the Raine Bow Vers. 13. I Have set my bow in the cloud c. 1. Neither Ambrose conceit can be admitted who understandeth not here the visible Raine-Bow in the clouds but the invisible power of God whereby he sometime intendeth sometime remitteth his judgements as a bow is bent and unbent againe But this collection is contrary to the text which saith The Bow shall be seene in the cloud vers 14. 2. Neither is their opinion found that thinke there was neither raine noâ— Raine-Bow before the floud for how could the plants and fruits of the earth have beene so many yeares preserved without raine so then the Raine-Bow was before the floud but it beganne onely now to be a signe of this covenant betweene God and man as the Lord chuseth sometime naturall things for signes as Bread and Wine and Water in the Sacraments Mercer 3. Neither is the opinion of some Hebrewes to be admitted that thinke the Raine-Bow to have beene before the floud but then it appeared in the cleare aire now in a cloud for the iris or Bow can have no existence or being but in a dewing or stilling cloud Mercer 4. Neither is Thomas Aquinas judgement and Cajetanus sound which thinke that the Râ—ine-Bow is partly a naturall signe that there shall be no floud because the Raine-bow sheweth not but when the clouds are thinne and dispersed whereas thicke and blacke clouds ingender inundations for the causes of the generall floud were not naturall and God without the clouds by the overflowing onely of the waters could drowne the world and beside if the Rain-bow were a naturall signe then before the floud came it might have prognosticated so much but then it should have beene a lying signe for notwithstanding the Raine bowes often appearing before the deluge as it is like the floud came 5. Though the Raine-bow bee not a naturall signe but voluntary depending upon the will and institution of God yet notwithstanding hath it some agreement with that which it is made a signe of like as baptisme in the flesh hath some resemblance of the soule so the Raine-bow is a fit and convenient signe to portend no inundation likely to follow because it is orâ—inarily a signe either of faire weather or of no long raine And it hath beene observed that a Raine-bow in the morning betokeneth showers in the evening faire weather Beside the Raine-bow is found to be wholesome to plants and herbs that where it lighteth it giveth them a more pleasant and
have not these words the rest have v. 6. unto an high oake S. famous valley H. unto the plaine of Morch caet celon signifieth both an oake and a valley or plaine v. 8. Bethel toward the west caeter toward the sea S. heb because the Mediterranean Sea was in the west side of Canaan v. 9. in the desart S. toward the South caeter negebh signifieth both v. 11. tooke his journey toward the East T. tooke his journey first C. from the East câ—t heb micehedem toward the East Gen. 28. v. 13. Say I am his sister S. thou art my sister caet I shall live for thy sake H. T. by thy occasion B. shall be preserved by thee G. for thy words C. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of thee S.P. heb biglal propter because v. 16. mules and Camels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. she ashes and camels câ—t athon a she asse chamer an hee asse the mule is the shee v. 19. I have taken her to my wife S.C.P. I might have taken her caet 3. The Exegesis or Theologicall Explication QVEST. I. Where and how the Lord spake to Abraham Vers. 1. FOr the Lord had said c. 1. God thus spake to Abraham not after his fathers death but while he was yet in Mesopotamia Act. 7.2 for to what end should the Lord have thus said Get thee out of the countrey c. if hee had beene come out thence already Calvin 2. Wee read that God spake unto Abraham eight times Gen. 12.1 againe v. 7. and c. 13.14 and c. 15.4 and 17.1 also c. 18.9 and c. 21.9 and 22. 1. It is like that divers other times the Lord spake unto him but these are expressed 2. And how God spake unto Abraham Basil thinketh it was citra ullam corporis vocem without any corporall or outward voyce but by the illumination of his minde Ramban thinketh it was by dreame some that God spake to him by Sem or some other Prophet but in this place it is like that God spake to Abraham either by himselfe or his Angels when he spake by dreame in sleepe or by vision when he was waking it is so expressed in the text as c. 15.1 QVEST. II. Whether God named it a countrey to Abraham whither he called him TO the land that I will shew thee c. 1. When the Lord thus called to Abraham hee named no certaine countrey whither hee should goe for the better triall of his faith for the Apostle saith Hee knew not whither hee went Hebr. 11.8 and Stephen Act. 7.3 nameth no countrey whither hee was called 2. Whereas Canaan is named in the former chapter vers 31. either Moses setteth downe the name of the country by way of anticipation or God might afterward shew unto Abraham as he went whither hee would have him to goe Calvin R. Isaach Carus thinketh that at the first Abraham understood that countrey to the which hee was called to be Canaan because of the curse that hee should be a servant c. but that is not like QVEST. III. Wherefore Abraham was called out of Chaldea into Canaan ANd the Lord called Abraham out of Chaldea into Canaan 1. Because Chaldea was given to abominable Idolatry and other great corruptions of life where Abraham could not remaine without great danger 2. That Gods blessing in the multiplying of Abrahams seede might better appeare abroad in a strange countrey Perer. 3. But the greatest cause was not as some thinke to converse with Sem who is held to be Melchizedek but that Abraham might take possession of that countrey and by faith and hope enioy that which was promised to be given to his seede Calvin QVEST. IIII. Where Abraham was when the Lord first called him Where Abraham should be when as God first called him there are divers opinions 1. It can neither be as Augustine thinketh that Abraham was called after he was departed out of Chaldea before he came to Charran beeing yet in Mesopotamia for to what end should the Lord have bidden Abraham to goe out of his countrey if he had beene removed alreadie To say with Augustine and Eucherius that now he is commanded to leave his countrey in affection as he had alreadie done in bodie hath no probabilitie for both Abraham should have beene disobedient to Gods Vocation beeing wedded still in desire to his countrie and it is not like that he had a minde to returne to an idolatrous countrey where he was to expect nothing but persecution Steven indeed saith he was in Mesopotamia when God called him but Mesopotamia is there taken largely as it comprehendeth Siria and Chaldea and so Steven saith that he came out of the land of the Chaldeans Act. 7.4 Mercer 2. Neither was Abraham twice called once in Chaldea and againe in Charran as Rupertus and Tostatus thinke upon this place for this had argued Abrahams sloth and negligence if hee had made no more haste to obey the calling of God Steven also Act. 7. maketh mention but of one calling 3. To say further that Steven beeing occupied with other matters might forget himselfe and not well remember the circumstance of time or that he was contented to follow the vulgar account is to doe wrong to so holie a man being directed by the spirit of God to speake neither doth Eucherius answer satisfie that expoundeth Steven thus that Abraham was placed in the land of Canaan after the death of Terah he might depart from Charran his father yet living but all that while hee was a sojourner in Canaan had no certaine place till after his fathers death Contra. But this sense is contrarie to the text that God after his fathers death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated or brought Abraham into Canaan this must be understood not of Abrahams setling in Canaan but his first remove thither 4. Neither is Lyranus opinion sound who therein followeth Rasi and Mizrahi that the calling which Moses here speaketh of was that in Charran for Abraham is bidden to come out of his countrey but Charran was not his countrey and the Lord saith hee brought him out of Vr of the Chaldeans chap. 15.7 not out of Charran But Paulus Burgensis opinion is farre wide that Charran was Abrahams countrie not Chaldea for Vr of the Chaldees is called the land of his brother Arans nativitie now whereas Abraham calleth it his countrie where Naâ—or dwelt in Charran in Aram Naharahim or Mesopotamia Gen. 24.8.4.10 there Mesopotamia or Naharaim the countrie betweene the rivers is taken in a large sense as it containeth both Siria and Chaldea as is before shewed or for that all his kindred were now remooved thither Mercer 5. Wherefore the truth is that Abraham was in Chaldea when the Lord called him so Aben Ezra Mercer for so the Lord saith cap. 15.7 and although he is bid to leave his kindred who came with him as Terah and Lot yet for all this his calling was in
60. yeares Gen. 25.26 and Iacob was an 130. when hee went into Aegypt Gen. 47.9 which all make 215. yeares the other 215. yeares may be accounted thus Cahath the sonne of Levi went downe with Iacob into Aegypt who as Eusebius thinketh begat Amram at 70. yeares Amram also at 70. might beget Moses who lived 80. yeares before the departure of the Israelites out of Aegypt the whose summe maketh 220. yeares from the which we must detract five yeares of the age of Cahath when he came downe with Iacob into Aegypt so there remaineth 215. yeares which is the time of the sojourning of Israel in Aegypt ex Mercer 3. Though the Israelites dwelt in Aegypt 215. yeares yet they were not kept in thraldome and affliction above an 130. nor yet so much for all the time of Iosephs government after Iacob came into Aegypt must be accepted which was 71. yeares for Ioseph was then 36. yeare old 30. yeere old hee was when he stood before Pharaoh and expounded his dreame Genes 41.49 and the seven plentifull yeares were past and two of famine Gen. 45.11 And Ioseph lived in all 110. yeares if then 39. bee deducted from 110. there will remaine 71. yeares all this while Israel was not afflicted Beside whereas their affliction began not till Ioseph and all his brethren were dead Exod. 1.6 and Levi supposed to bee 44. yeare old when he came into Aegypt lived 137. yeare Exod. 5.16 was 39. yeares in Aegypt which being subtracted from 215. yeares the time of their dwelling in Aegypt there will remaine not above 122. yeares which was the time of their thraldome and bondage in Aegypt 4. Their foure hundred yeares of servitude in a land not theirs 1. must not be counted from Abrahams first comming into the land of Canaan as Chrysostome for from thence the 430. yeares mentioned Exod. 12.40 must take beginning and the text is thy seed shall be a stranger we must then begin to count from the birth of Isaak Abrahams seed 2. Neither is it like that God afterward seeing their extreme affliction shortned this time of 400. yeares which also is Chrysostomes conjecture for Gods word altereth not and S. Steven Act. 7.6 abridging this story setteth the same time of 400. yeares not of 430. as some latine copies have wherein the translation is corrupted 3. Neither is the land of Canaan here to be excluded as Oleaster thinketh for although it was promised to Abraham for an inheritance they were as yet strangers therin for Abraham had not so much as a breadth of a foot Act. 7.5 and Iacob counted himselfe a pilgrime and stranger there Gen. 47.9 4. Neither to make up these foure hundred yeares need we with Iosephus to count 170. yeares betweene Iosephs death and Moses birth which was not above 64. yeares Iosephus confuting Cheremons errour that would have Ioseph and Moses both of one time falleth into another rour himselfe 5. Wherefore this time of 400. yeares must begin at Isaaks birth though precisely they were 405. yeares which few odde yeares in so great a summe maketh no great difference Againe this land not theirs is not only Aegypt but Canaan and where the text rehearseth these three they shall be strangers serve and be entreated evill wee must joyntly not severally apply all these to the time limited of 400. yeares that this whole time they were either strangers or served or were afflicted and so Augustine well understandeth qu. 47. in Exod. Mercer QVEST. XV. How diversly a generation is taken Vers. 16. IN the fourth generation they shall come hither c. A generation is sometime taken for the whole life of man and continuance of an age as Matth. 24.34 this generation shall not passe till all these things be fulfilled that is some now alive may live to see it sometime it is taken for the succession of persons as Matth. 1.17 sometime for a certaine number of yeeres as for the space of ten yeares Baruch 6.2 the time of the captivity in Babylon which was 70. yeares is limited to seven generations for 20. yeares Euseb. lib. de praepar 10. c. ult for 33. yeares Herod lib. 2. for 30. Diodor. lib. 3. c. 13. for an 100. Dyonis Halicar lib. 1. Rom. antiquit According to these divers acceptions 1. Some doe understand here a generation for an 100. yeares but that cannot be for the Israelites came not out in the fourth hundred yeare but in the beginning of the fifth Iun. 2. Some take it for the space of seventy yeares out of the Psal. 90.10 and so after the Israelites had dwelt three generations that is thrice 70. yeares 220. yeares in Aegypt then in the fourth 70. yeare they entred the land of Canaan sic Iunius But the best computation of these generations is from the succession of persons yet we must neither begin from the eldest persons that entred into Aegypt as Cajetanus and Lyranus reckon these foure generations from Iacob to Iudas from Iudas to Pharez Pharez to Ezron Ezron to Caleb so also Mercerus which make foure generations which computation is a great errour for that Caleb which entred to Canaan was not the sonne of Ezron but of Iephunne Ios. 14.6 long after the other Caleb for we reade of three Calebs the first the son of Ezron 1 Chron. 2.9 the second the sonne of Hur ibid. v. 50. the third the sonne of Iephunne 1 Chron. 4.15 from Iudah to this Caleb were six or seven generations neither could Ezron bee the father of this Caleb for Ezron came downe with Iacob into Aegypt Gen. 46.12 and Caleb was about 40. yeare old when the Israelites came out of Aegypt Iosu. 14.7 and the time of the Israelites abode in Aegypt was 215. yeares take from that the 40. yeares of Calebs age and suppose Ezron to have beene but five yeares old at his comming to Aegypt by this account he should be 170. yeare old before he begat Caleb whereas Caleb the sonne of Ezron was borne long before his father was 60. yeares old 1 Chron. 2.21 wherefore that Caleb which lived with Iosua was not the sonne of Ezron Neither must we account only those generations that were borne in Aegypt as Perer. for so wee shall have but three generations Caath begat Amram in Aegypt Amram Aaron Aaron Eleazer who divided the land but the right reckoning is to begin from the youngest of those generations that went downe to Aegypt and so from Kohath to Eleazer are foure generations Cohath begat Amram Amram begat Aaron Aaron Eleazer 4. But Philo his allegoricall conceit I let passe who by the fourth generation understandeth the fourth age of mans life when after the simplicity of his childhood the riot of his youth the instruction of his middle age he commeth to yeares of gravity and judgement for who seeth not how unproper and disagreeing to this historicall prophecie such mysticall collections are QVEST. XVI Why God spared the wickednesse of the Amorites Vers. 16.
kindred namely of the issue of his brother Nachor by his wife Milcah and his concubine Reumah vers 20. to the end In the first part wee have 1. Gods commandement to Abraham to sacrifice his sonne vers 1 2. 2. Abrahams obedience vers 3 4.5 3. The preparation to the sacrifice the wood the fire the knife the altar Isaacks binding are all expressed vers 6. to vers 10. 4. Gods prevention of Abraham and provision of another sacrifice vers 10. to 15. 5. The Lords commendation of Abrahams faith and obedience with renuing of the promise 2. The divers readings v. 2. Only begotten sonne H. only sonne caet he jachad to unite Into the land of vision H. high land S. the land of Gods worship C. the land of Moriah cat which some derive of jarah to feare some of raah to see v. 6. a sword H.S.C. a knife caet maacelet signifieth both derived of acal to devoure v. 7. Where is the sacrifice H. the sheepe S. beast B. lambe G.P. the little beast T.H. sheh signifieth a small beast of sheepe or goats v. 13. one ramme S. after that a ramme c. C. aramme behind cae behind achad caught in the plant Sabech S. in a tree C. in a thicket or bush caet Sabach the perplexity or intangling in bushes or trees v. 14. And Abraham prayed and offered sacrifice in this place and said before the Lord here shall be generations serving him therefore it is said to this day in this mountaine Abraham sacrificed to God C. and the Lord called the name of the place Iehovah â—ireh G. or the Lord seeth caet v. 16. hast not withdrawne thy sonne T. spared thy sonne caet chashach to forbid v. 18. all the people of the earth shall be blessed because of thy sonnes Ch. in thy seed shall all the nations be blessed caet v. 24. concubine Rema S. Roma H.C. reumah v. 21. the father of the Syrians H.S. father of Aram cater 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QVEST. I. At what yeare of his age Isaack should have beene sacrificed Vers. 1. AFter these things 1. Though it be uncertaine in what yeare of Isaacks age Abraham was bidden to sacrifice him yet it is neither like that he was then but 12. yeare old as Aben Ezra ex Tostato seeing Abraham laid a burthen of wood upon his shoulder neither was he yet 37. yeares old as some Hebrewes hold which was the yeare of Sarahs death for this was done Sarah being yet living and in good health But Iosephus opinion seemeth to bee more probable that Isaack was at this time 25. yeare old 2. But that this was done the first day of the seventh moneth upon which occasion the Jewes observed the feast of blowing of Trumpets in remembrance of Isaacks deliverance is but a Jewish tradition without ground 3. Whereas Nyssenus and Augustine thinke that Sarah knew of this intended sacrifice Chrysostomes opinion is more like that she knew it not lest she should have beene too much grieved with the losse of her sonne Ex Perer. QVEST. II. Why Isaack was commanded to be sacrificed Vers. 2. TAke thy onely Sonne c. There seeme to have beene two principall ends of this commandement of God 1. that thereby Abrahams faith and obedience might be tried as the Apostle saith Heb. 11.17 by faith Abraham offred up Isaack 2. The other end was to bee a lively type and representation of the sacrifice of Christ and to this sense some expound that place Heb. 11.19 that Abraham received Isaack èn Parabolè in a similitude or parable which though it seeme not to be the proper meaning of those words yet this offering up of Isaack in sacrifice in many things representeth the death of Christ 1. as Abraham offered Isaack so God gave his sonne to dye for the world 2. as Isaack was not sacrificed so Christ was the lambe that was as though hee had beene killed Revel 5 6. his divinity died not and his humanity was revived 3. the time also agreeth Abraham was three dayes and three nights in going to the place of sacrifice as Christ was so long in the grave 4. the wood is laid upon Isaack Christ carried his crosse 5. the ramme is entangled in a thicker Christ was crowned with thornes 6. Isaack was offered in the same place where afterward the temple stood and our Saviour suffered at Hierusalem QVEST. III. Of the ten severall tentations of Abraham THis was the last and greatest tentation of Abraham and in number the tenth 1. Abraham was tempted and tried when he was bidden to come forth of his countrey not knowing whither 2. When by reason of the famine he went downe to Aegypt 3. When Pharaoh tooke away his wife that both hee was in danger of his life and she of her chastity 4. When there was a strife betweene Lots servants and his 5. When he was constrained to arme himselfe and his servants to rescue Lot taken captive 6. When at Sarahs motion he expelled Agar out of his house 7. When at ninety nine yeares of his age he was circumcised in his foreskinne 8. When Abimelech tooke away his wife 9. When he sent away Hagar and Ismael his sonne 10. When he was commanded of God to sacrifice his sonne Isaack Perer. ex Haebreis QVEST. IV. Whether this mountaine Moriah were the same wherein the Temple was built Vers. 2. TO the Land of Moriah 1. That this was the mountaine where afterward the temple was built there is no question for so it is directly affirmed 2. Cron. 3.1 2. But whether Christ were crucified upon this mountaine it cannot certainely be affirmed as Avgustine thinketh receiving it from Hierom. serm dempor 71. seeing Christ suffered without the citie in mount Calvarie unlesse it can bee shewed that these two mountaines are continued together and so in effect but one 3. But that Cain and Abel did sacrifice in this place it is unlike seeing they kept not off from paradise which was in Mesopotamia neither did Noah build his altar here after the floud because the scripture saith that the arke rested upon the hills of Armenia Gen. 8. and immediately upon Noahs comming forth of the Arke he reared that Altar unto God 4. This hill whereon the temple stood was sometime higher than the rest of the City as Iosephus describeth it but the Romans cast it downe into the brooke Cedron so that now it is in a manner a plaine lower than the other parts of the City Perer. ex Borchard QVEST. V. Of the originall and derivation of the name of Moriah FOr the signification of the word Moriah 1. some interpret it the bright or shining hill deriving it of oorh light because there was the oracle of God Aquila 2. Some would have it so called of Marar myrrhe because that place abounded with myrrhe and cynamon Cantic 4.6 3. Some of jara to feare because God was there feared and worshipped Chald. 4.
doe urge and induce another to speake the truth or doe or not doe any thing as Ahab adjured Michaias and charged him in the name of God to speake the truth 2 Chron. 18.15 or else it is used passively when we force another to take an oath as Abraham here maketh his servant to sweare The first kinde of adjuration is used two wayes 1. By way of deprecation and intreaty by the inferiour to the superiour as the devils doe impudently adjure Christ not to torment them Matth. 5.7 but it was by way of intreaty vers 10. 2. It is used by way of authority and command 1. Thus the Prince adjureth his subjects as Saul did the people that they should eat nothing till night 1 Sam. 14.24 2. Thus the Apostles charged and commanded the spirits to come out of men as Paul did Act. 16.18 By this kinde of adjuration which is with power and authority spirits may be adjured but by the other which is by intreaty and supplication to conjure them which is nothing else but to intreat them for their helpe as Magicians and sorcerers doe it is a great impiety and plaine idolatry 3. Yea by a power and authority given from God thus the senslesse creatures may be adjured and commanded as Iosua by the power of God commanded the Sunne to stand still and it obeyed Perer. The other kinde of adjuring which is by ministring an oath is to be used onely in grave and weighty causes either divine as Nehemiah tooke an oath of the people that they should not give their daughters in marriage to the heathen Nehem. 13.25 or in humane affaires 1. For the deciding of controversies and ending of strife Heb. 6.16 2. For the binding of one to the obedient or faithfull performance of his service As Abraham here taketh an oath of his servant so officers may lawfully be sworne for the upright execution of their office and subjects to be loyall and true to their Prince 3. For the establishing of a league or covenant as an oath was betweene Iacob and Laban Gen. 32.53 4. For the clearing of a suspition as the woman suspected of adultery was charged with an oath by the Priest Numb 5.21 5. For the satisfaction of our neighbour in a matter of trust Exod. 22.11 so by the law the debtor may be lawfully urged with an oath by his creditor 6. For the security of a mans life one may sweare to another as the Egyptian servant to the Amalekite required an oath of David for the safety of his life and estate Sweare unto me by God that thou wilt neither kill me nor deliver me into the hands of my master c. 1 Sam. 30.15 QUEST VI. Why Abraham refuseth to take a wife from the daughters of Canaan Vers. 3. THou shalt not take to my sonne of the daughters of Canaan c. The reasons why Abraham would not have his sonne Isaack be linked in mariage with the Canaanites are these 1. Because they came of cursed Cham Generis author maledictionis haereditatem transmisit in suos The author of their stocke for not honouring his father did bring a curse as an inheritance upon his posterity Ambr. lib de Abrah cap. 9. 2. Because the Canaanites were Idolaters and of corrupt manners Primum in conjugio religio quaratur Religion must first be sought in mariage Ambr. Againe Salomon was corrupted and perverted from his faith by his idolatrous wives for although Nachors stocke were not pure in religion having a smattering of imagery and idolatrous worship as Laban sought for his gods that were stolen from him Gen. 31.30 yet they had some knowledge and understanding of God as appeareth in this chapter vers 50. This thing is proceeded of the Lord c. And beside their manners were honest and commendable not like to the Canaanites as is evident by Rebecca her virginity and their humanity in entertaining of strangers Perer. 3. Another reason hereof was for that the Lord promised the Countrey to Abrahams posterity and to expell the Canaanites therefore Abraham as he refused to bury his dead among them so much lesse would mingle his seed in mariage with them Mercer QUEST VII Why Abraham sendeth not Isaack to chuse his owne wife Vers. 4. THou shalt goe 1. Though Abraham send his servant about this businesse of mariage yet it was not without Isaacks consent who knowing this servant to be the minister of his father will yeeldeth himselfe to his fathers choice 2. Isaack is not sent not to make a way unto a mystery as Rupertus thinketh to shadow forth Christ who not by himselfe went but by his Apostles sent to the Gentiles 3. And though Isaack afterward sent Iacob for the same end to chuse him a wife from his fathers kindred yet that case was not like to this for Isaack had two sonnes Abraham but one and besides Iacob fled from the wrath of his brother to save his life Perer. And further Isaack was but forty yeares old a youth â—n those dayes Iacob was about seventy seven yeares of age and so fitter to chuse for himselfe QUEST VIII In what sense Mesopotamia is called Abrahams Country seeing he was borne in Chaldea Vers. 4. GOe unto my Countrey and kindred This Countrey and place of Abrahams kindred is named to be Aram Naharaim that is Mesopotamia vers 10. where was the City of Nahor which was Charran Gen. 28.10 Now Charran in Mesopotamia is said to be Abrahams Countrey 1. Not that he was borne there as Ramban and Paulus Burgens thinke for the place of Abrahams birth was Ur of the Chaldees Gen. 11.28 2. Neither is it called his Country because as Tostatus thinketh he dwelled there a long time even 60. yeares till the death of his father which is a great errour for Abraham stayed not long in Charran Eucherius thinketh but one yeare Pererius not so much Mercerus some two years Iunius five yeares howsoever the time was not long for Abraham no doubt being called to goe into Canaan would make no long aboad by the way nor yet deferre to obey Gods commandement So then neither Pererius thinketh right that Terah lived 60. yeares in Charran after Abrahams departure for Abraham came not into Canaan till after his fathers death Act. 7.4 And Tostatus also is deceived that Abraham with Terah lived together 60. yeares in Charran for seeing Abraham was but 75. yeares old when he departed from Charran if he staied there 60. then was hee but 15 yeare old when he came first to Charran which cannot be for he was then married Gen. 11.30 But both these errors are builded upon a false ground that Abraham was the eldest sonne of Torah and borne in his 70. yeare whereas the truth is hee was the youngest and borne in the 130. yeare of his fathers age as hath beene before shewed in the questions upon the 11. chapter 3. Wherefore the solution is this that Abraham calleth all the region beyond Euphrates his
Assignes of THOMAS MAN PAVL MAN and IONAH MAN 1632. TO THE MOST HONOVRABLE LORD THE L. DVKE OF LENOX AND TO THE RIGHT Honourable the Earle of Marre Lords of his Majesties most Honourable Privie Counsell Grace mercie and Peace from the Lord JESUS RIght Honourable as the highest Majestie in his wise providence hath united and conjoyned your Honours not onely in one consent and judgement of religion but also in the joynt administration and regiment of this Nation and Kingdome under his excellent Majestie so I thought good to make your Honours with other of your Honourable place united Patrons of these my labours and as he saith non debet charta dividere quos amor mutuus copulavit It was not fit that I should sever you in this my duty who are combined in your mutuall amity Men of noble birth delight much in antiquities and it is their glory to derive their bloud by many descents from their thrice renowned ancestors here I present to your Honourable view that noble and most ancient family of Abraham Isaack and Iacob who were in favour with God and in honour and great reputation with men whose children they are which imitate their piety and obedience that famous Matron Paula whom Hierome so much commendeth was by her father descended of Aeneas and the noble house of the Gracchi by her mother of Agamemnon of whom Hierome made this Epitaph thought her Christian profession more honourable than her noble birth and condition and so I doubt not but that it is also your honourable resolution to say with the Apostle who having rehearsed his great privileges after the flesh his birth parentage and profession thus concludeth I count all these things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Iesus for whom I have counted all things as losse and doe judge them as dung that I might winne Christ as Hierome also saith well Summa apud Deum nobilitas clarum esse virtutibus I it is the greatest nobility with God to shine with vertue Here your Honours have the worthy example of the Patriarks to follow the Heathen presidents are but counterfeit and deceitfull they had the shadowes of vertues rather than the substance as Ambrose saith well of Polemo who of a drunken and riotous companion by hearing of Xenocrates became a Philosopher Siresipâ—ir a vino fuit semper tamen temulentus sacrilegio If hee were sober from wine yet hee was drunke with superstition But these holy examples are seasoned with grace and savour of true religion Abraham was famous in Pharaohs Court so was Isaack in Abimelecks and Iacob in another Pharaohs also for their piety and vertue So they which walke in their steps shall be great both with God and man Abraham told Abimelech plainly of the wrongs which his servants had done him Gen. 21.15 so is it the part of good Courtiers to shew unto the King the wrongs and oppressions that are done in the lanâ— to succour the poore to releeve the oppressed to countenance the truth to maintaine justice and equity Iacob being in Bethel saw a ladder which reached to heaven and the Angels ascending and descending upon it whereupon one thus noteth In the house of Bethel there is alwayes both going up and comming downe this I say not that the goers down should dismay you but the climers up incourage you So in the Princes Bethel and Court there be examples of both sorts of some that are declining and sliding backe onely seeking to make themselves great and to bee enriched by the Kings favour some there are though the smallest number which doe ascend upon this ladder not aspiring to their owne honour but using their favour to the glory of God and benefit of his Church Thus I trust your Lordships have learned to scale this ladder of honour to the which you are called to raise up those which are in the dust to set forward the truth to nourish and encourage the Preachers thereof to speake for the innocent to hold out your helpfull hand to the needy so shall your Honours ascend from step to step till you come to the top of the ladder where Christ sitteth who shall cast and tumble downe from thence all unfaithfull Stewards and cut them off to have their portion with hypocrites Matth. 24.51 but shall say unto you and all other that shall serve him faithfully herein in earth It is well done good servant and faithfull thou hast beene faithfull in little I will make thee ruler over much enter into thy masters joy Amen Your Honours ready to be commanded in the Lord ANDREW WILLET THE FIRST BOOKE OF THIS SECOND PART OF GENESIS Containing the Historie concerning the Patriarks ISAACK IACOB Hitherto hath beene continued the holy story of those three great Patriarks Adam before the floud Noah in the floud Abraham after the floud the rest of this Booke of Genesis followeth which setteth forth the life acts and death of the three other fathers Isaack Iacob Ioseph CHAP. XXV 1. The Contents of the Chapter IN this Chapter 1. Concerning Abraham his second mariage is declared with the issue thereof his children and their gifts vers 1. to 6. Then Abrahams yeares death and buriall vers 7. to 11. 2. Concerning Ismael his generations or off-spring are expressed his yeares of life his place of dwelling vers 12. to 20. 3. Of Isaack there is set downe his time of marriage the barrennesse of his wife the remedie by prayer vers 20.21 4. Concerning Esau and Iacob these things are rehearsed 1. Their manner of conception vers 22 23. 2. Of their birth 24. to 27. 3. Their divers education vers 27 28. 4. Esau his prophanenesse in selling his birth-right for a messe of pottage vers 29. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 1. Abraham had taken him another wife H.G. proceeding or adding tooke another wife caeter v. 2. Zambran Ioctan Madal Sebe S. Zimran Iocksan Madan Shuah caeter v. 3. The sonnes of Dedan were in holds tents and Islands â— the sons of Dedan Asshurim Letushim Leumim v. 4. Gephar Apher Raga S. Epha Epher Eldaha caeter v. 6. Sonnes of the Concubine C. of the Concubines caet v. 8. And fainting or wearing away H.S.C.B. he yeelded up the spirit or died T.G.P. jagaug signifieth to faint gavagh expirare to yeeld the spirit which word is here used v. 11. Isaack dwelt by the Well of the living and seeing H.B. the Well of vision S. Where the Angell of life appeared C. Beâ—r-lahairâ— G.P. the fountaine Lahoiro T. v. 12. Which Hagar the Egyptian Sarahs maid bare H. bare to Abraham caet v. 13. These the names of his sonnes H. of the sonnes of Ismael cat v. 13. Nadbehel Massa. S. Adbehel Mibsa cat v. 18. from Havilah to Agara C. from Havila to Sur. cat v. 18. he died in the presence of all his brethren H.B.P. he dwelt S.C. his lot fell T. G. naphal signifieth 〈◊〉 fall it
and died c. 1. Though the word gavâ— rather so signifieth expirare to give up the ghost than deficere to faint Hieromes reason is not so good quia non coâ—venit Abraha deficere it was not fitting that Abraham should faint and decrease for no morall decreasing or fainting is here spoken of but onely naturall 2. Neither is this word which signifieth to yeeld up the Spirit used onely of the just as Rabbi Salomon and Lyranâ—â— for the same is uttered of the old world Gen. 7.21 all the flesh yeelded the breath and of Ismael vers 17. of this chapter 3. Neither is Oleasters reason sufficient why we should read rather he fainted than yeelded up the spirit because it followeth he died and so the same thing would be twice expressed for this expiring or yeelding up of the spirit sheweth the facility and easinesse of his death as the word following betokeneth the thing that he dyed so this declareth the manner not that he dyed without any sicknesse or griefe as Aben Ezra for the faithfull are not exempted from the common condition of mankind Vatah. but it sheweth that he willingly rendred up his soule into the hands of God Calvin 4. Cajetanes collection is not here to be refused that three things are set downe by Moses concerning Abrahams departure 1. that he dyed that is was dissolved which belongeth unto the whole man as consisting of body and soule 2. that hee was buried which concerneth his body 3. that he was gathered unto his people in respect of his soule which was joyned to the blessed company of the Saints Cajet in hunc lâ—â—um QUEST XIII How Abraham died in a good age and full of yeares IN a good age satisfied or full of daies 1. In that Abraham is said to have died in a good old age whereas many before him were of longer life and much elder of whom this phrase is not used Philo gathereth that it was not the old age of his body but his perfection of vertue that made a good old age Disce soli viro bonâ— contingere senectutem bonam Know that onely a good old age happened to a good man sic etiam Calvin 2. Hee was full because daies is not added in the originall the Hebrewes gather that he was full not onely of daies but of all other blessings ex Mercer and he was satisfied with daies as not desirous to have his life prolonged Calvin Thus even some among the Heathen were satâ—â—e with daies as Cicero writeth of Cato that he should say Siquis deus mihi largiatur â—t ex hac atate repusrascam in cunis vagiam valde recâ—sem that if God should grant me to become a childe againe and to cry in the cradle I would refuse it Cicer. de senectus Therefore Abraham was in another sort full of daies because his daies were full of vertue hee had not spent his life in vaine but as Apelles the cunning painter was wont to say nullus dies sine linea no day without a line and Titus the Emperour if any day had passed wherein he had not done some good would say to his friends Diemperdidi I have lost a day so no doubt Abraham did passe over his time in fruitfull workes Perer. QUEST XIV How the sinner is said to die before his time ABraham then received a great blessing of God in living both long and well and dying in his time not as the Preacher saith of the wicked man lest thou die in tempore non tuo in a time not thine Ecclesiast 7.19 which is so spoken 1. Not that a man can die before the time appointed of God for a mans daies are determined with God Iob 14.5 2. Nor yet so onely because the wicked is never prepared or fit for death both because he is destitute of vertue as also hee expecteth not death in which respects in some sense he may be said to die not in his time being neither ripe for it in vertue nor looking for it 4. But the sinner is said to die before his time when the naturall course of his life which he in the judgement of man though not in the determination of God might have lived is by some violent and extraordinary kinde of death shortned and cut off as Nadab and Abihu for offering in strange fire were thus before their time consumed with a fire sent from God Levit. 10. ex Perer. QUEST XV. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 8. ANd was gathered to his people 1. This people are not the sunne moone and starres or the invisible idaea or formes according to the which these sensible things were made or the foure elements of the which the bodies of men are compounded as Philo imagineth these are but Platonicall conceits and who seeth not how unproperly the name of people agreeth to any of these 2. Neither with Augustine by people doe we understand the society and company of Angels for Ismael also is said vers 17. to be gathered to his people 3. Neither can it bee applied to Limbus patrum where all the just men were from the beginning of the world as Lyranus Rupertus unlesse they will say that Ismael also went into the place of just men who was also gathered to his people and whereas they make Limbuâ— patrum a member of hell a place of darknesse Abraham went not thither seeing Abrahams besome was a place of rest and joy where the Angels were for they carried Lazarus soule thither But these blessed spirits are Angels of light and not of darknesse 4. We also refuse Burgensis conceit who noteth a difference of phrase in the old and new testament when the Scripture speaketh of the dead they are said that die in the new testament to die in the Lord which phrase is not used of any in the old testament because they were not admitted ad beatificam Dei visioneâ—â— to the blessed presence and sight of God Contr. Indeed I grant that after the manifestation of the Messiah to the world the Scripture speaketh more clearely of the faithfull departed in the new testament because the Messiah was then come but not for any such cause pretended for even the soules of the faithfull departed in the old testament did enjoy the presence of God as David saith I shall behold thy face in righteousnesse and when I awake be satisfied with thine image Psal. 17.15 he doubted not but that his soule first apart should see God and then both body and soule in the resurrection and the Scripture speaketh evidently that Abraham Isaack and Iacob did live with God for of them God is called who is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 5. Neither this phrase to be gathered to his people doth only signifie to be in the state of the dead and equivalent to that phrase to sleepe with their fathers which is spoken of the wicked as well as of the righteous as idolatrous Ahaz is
thinketh the word also signifieth to he Iud. 7.12 so that this is the sense that he lay that is dwelt as the Septuagint and Chalde translate before his brethren that is he bordered upon them his brethren the sonnes of Keturah not he onely in person but his posterity inhabiting this large countrey whereof the desart of Sur was the bounds on the south the land of Chavilah not that in India but another in Arabia where the Geographers place the Chaulateans on the East Assiria on the North so that this sheweth the accomplishment of that prophecie Gen. 16.12 he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren Mercer Iun. QUEST XX. Why Isaack is againe said to be the sonne of Abraham Vers. 19. THese are the generations of Isaack Abrahams sonne c. 1. Although the birth of Iacob and Esau was long before Ismaels death for at that time Ismael was but 74. yeares old 14. yeare elder than Isaack who was 60. at the birth of his children but Ismael lived in all 137. yeare yet Moses finisheth and knitteth up briefly the story of Ismael because he maketh haste to set downe the story of Isaack and Iacob the Patriarkes of the Church and people of God 2. Yet hee dwelleth not long in the history of Isaack handling the life and acts of Iacob in the most part of this booke behinde and as it may appeare for these reasons 1. Because all the children of Iacob the twelve Patriarkes were founders of the visible Church whereas Esau came of Isaack 2. For that greater variety of temptations and changes happened to Iacob than to Isaack wherein he shewed experiment of his vertue 3. More excellent visions were manifested to Iacob than to Isaack six in all Genes 28.2 Genes 31.3 cap. 32.4 and 5. chap. 35.6 Gen. 46. whereas two onely were revealed to Isaack expressed c. 26. ex Perer. 3. Isaack is here againe called the sonne of Abraham not because some sorcerers of that time held him to be Abimelechs sonne and therefore to put the matter out of doubt hee is againe repeated to be Abrahams sonne thus the Hebrews conjecture but because Genealogers must beginne from the first famous author or father Moses beginneth with Abraham to whom such large promises were made concerning his seed QUEST XXI Why Isaack staid three yeares after Sarahs death for Rebecca Vers. 20. ISaack was 40. yeare old when he tooke Rebecca to wife c. 1. The Hebrewes doe but fable that Rebecca was borne about Sarahs death and that Isaack stayed for her 3. yeares after for though the report of Rebecâ—a her birth about that time came to Abraham Gen. 22. yet then it was not done and if Rebecca had beene then borne Isaack must have stayed longer for her than 3. yeares Rasi thinketh Rebecca was then 10. yeare old and that Isaack stayed for her three years more but it is more like that she was then 30. yeares of age ten yeares younger than Isaack as Sarah was to Abraham Mercer 2. Rupertus allegorie also is but forced that as Sarah died 3. yeares before the marriage of Isaack and Rebecca so from the baptisme of Christ three yeares before his passion the law began to die 3. Mention is here made of Bethuel and Laban to shew the grace of God toward Rebecca that was a rose between two thornes having a superstitious both father and brother Muscul. as also Laban is brought in to make a way for the storie following whose daughters Iacob married Iun. QUEST XXII Whence Mesopotamia was called Padan Vers. 20. OF Padan Aram. This was not the name of a city but a country for the name of Laban and Bethuels city was Charran 1. It was not called Padan Aram that is the region or countrey of Aram. 2. Neither because Padan in the Syrian tongue signifieth a paire is it so called because there were two countreys of Syria or Aram Aram Soba and Aram Naharaim or Mesopotamia and the name of Padan to be given to Mesopotamia as the chiefe 3. But a part of Mesopotamia was so called because of two floods which parted and divided the river Chaborah and Euphrates a monument of this name Padan appeareth in the name Aphadans given unto two townes one situate by Euphrates the other by the river Chabora Iunius ex Ptolem. QUEST XXIII Wherefore barren women were the mothers of the Church Vers. 21. BEcause she was barren We finde in Scripture that many excellent women appointed to be the mothers of holy men were barren as Sara Rebecca Rachel Anna the mother of Samuel Elizabeth the mother of Iohn Baptist the reasons are yeelded to be these 1. That we might know genus Israeliticum non naturali successione sed gratia esse multiplicatum that the Israelites were multiplied not by naturall succession but by grace Theodoret. qu. 74. in Genes 2. Vt ex mirabili partu sterilium foemmarum praestrueretur fides partus virginis that by the miraculous bearing of barren women a way mihgt be made to beleeve the birth of a virgin Chrysost. hom 49. in Genes 3. This was also done ad consolaâ—dos autmos sterilium conjugum to comfort the minds of barren couples Chrysost. ibid. 4 It might be that God would qualifie the excesse of Isaacks love by this meanes Calvin QUEST XXIV Why and how long Isaack prayed for his wife Vers. 21. ISaack prayed to the Lord for his wife 1. He knew that the impediment was in his wife and not in himselfe because of Gods promise made to Abraham Gen. 21.17 I will greatly multiplie thy seed and therefore he prayeth for Rebecca 2. It is not like that hee continued in this prayer twenty yeares so long as Rebecca was barren as Chrysostome thinketh hom 49. in Gen. for some experience Isaack first had of her barrennesse which could not be immediately after their marriage 3. Neither as Rasi did hee expect ten yeares as Abraham so long tooke triall of Sarah before hee tooke Hagar and hereupon the Hebrewes after ten yeares triall of barrennesse doe take liberty to repudiate their wives for the ten yeares after the which Sarah gave Hagar to Abraham are to be counted not from their marriage but from their comming into Canaan 4. The time therefore cannot be presently set how many yeares Isaack continued praying for his wife but it is like he continued and waited in prayer for so the word gnathar here used signifieth to frequent and multiply prayer 5. And where the word is nocach he prayed in respect or toward his wife we need neither to understand his wife alway to be present when he prayed or that they prayed together one in one corner the other in another as the Hebrewes but the meaning is that he prayed in the behalfe of his wife though it is not unlike but that sometime they prayed together QUEST XXVII Why Isaack did not thinke of second marriage as Abraham tooke Agar NOw Isaack seeing his wife to be barren did not take unto him another
Prophet expoundeth this place of Gods eternall love and hatred of Iacob and Esau 2. That is the proper sense of the place from the which an argument is framed and a conclusion inferred but out of this spirituall sense concerning everlasting election the Apostle reasoneth and concludeth election to be only of grace not by workes Ergo it is the proper sense 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. The reconciliation of brethren Vers. 9. HIs sonne Isaack and Ismael buried him They which were separated during their fathers life are now united and reconciled in his death which teacheth us that brethren which have beene long at variance should yet when the time of mourning for their father commeth returne in affection Muscul. Not as Esau that intended when his father was dead to execute his malice toward his brother Gen. 27.41 2. Observ. To continue and persevere in prayer Vers. 21. ISaack prayed to the Lord for his wife It seemeth seeing Rebeccah continued barren twenty yeares for Isaack was maried at 40. and was 60. yeares old when Esau and Iacob were borne that Isaack continued many yeares in prayer and waited from moneth to moneth from yeare to yeare till the Lord had condescended to his prayer whereby wee are taught that wee should not give over in our prayers neither limit God to heare us within a time but still patiently expect his gracious pleasure as the Apostle exhorteth that wee should pray continually 1 Thes. 5.17 Mercer 3. Observ. Gods will many times revealed to the weaker sort Vers. 28. ISaack loved Esau c. Rebeccah was better affected toward the chosen seed than Isaack waâ—â— so was Sarahs heart toward Isaack but Abraham loved Ismael whereby wee see that manâ— times God revealeth his will to the more infirme sex and as S. Paul saith chuseth the weake things of 〈◊〉 world to confound the strong 1 Cor. 1.17 Muscul. 4. Observ. Of frugality in meats and drinkes Vers. 29. NOw Iacob sod pottage c. By this we may see how frugall and sparing the diet of those godly Patriarkes was Iacob here contented himselfe with lentill pottage These lentils came from Egypt and was the usuall food in Alexandria for young and old which was commonly vendible in their Tabernes Gell. lib. 17. c. 18. from thence the use of lentils became very common in other countries the Philosopher Taurus used to sup with them and Zeno the Stoike prescribed to his schollers how they should seeth and dresse their lentils with the twelfth part of Coriander seed Athen. lib. 4. The like frugality and parsimony was used in famous countries among the Gentiles The Arcadians lived of akornes the Argives of apples the Athenians of figs the Tyrinthians of peares the Indians of canes the Carmanes of palmes the Sauromatians of millet the Persians nasturtio of cresses These examples ought to make Christians ashamed who use to pamper their bellies and feed their fansies with curious delights and exquisite dainties Perer. S. Paul giveth a rule for this meats for the belly the belly for meats God shall destroy both it and them 1 Cor. 6.13 that therefore men should not bee so carefull to feed and fill their bellies with dainty fare and costly meats seeing they both must fall to corruption 5. Observ. Against prophane persons that sell heaven for earthly pleasures Vers. 33. HE sold his birth-right Esau that for a messe of red pottage did part with his birth-right is a president and patterne of all those which for the momentany pleasures and profit of this life doe sell and lose their hope of eternall life Mercer As that rich glutton Luke 16. which purchased his ease and pleasure in this life with the everlasting paine and torment of his soule afterward for this cause is Esau called a prophane person Heb. 12.16 which for one portion of meat sold his birth-right CHAP. XXVI 1. The Argument or Contents FIrst in this Chapter is shewed the occasion of Isaacks going to Gerar which was by reason of the famine vers 1. And Gods Commandement vers 2 3. with the renewing of the promise made to Abraham 4 5. Secondly this Chapter treateth of Isaacks abode and dwelling in Gerar with such things as there happened 1. The question that arose about his wife vers 7â— to 12. 2. The envy of the Philistims against Isaack because hee prospered and waxed rich vers 13. to 18. 3. The contention betweene Isaacks servants and the Philistims concerning certaine fountaines vers 18. to vers 23. Thirdly there is declared the departure of Isaack from Gerar to dwell in Beersheba and the covenant there made betweene him and Abimelech vers 23. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 3. 18. my word shall be an helpe unto thee C. I will be with thee and blesse thee caeter v. 10. one of my stocke might have slept S. C. one of my people might have lion caet heb shacabh thou mightst have brought upon us ignorance S. this sinne caet v. 11. he that toucheth this mans wife H. this man or his wife caet v. 12. he found barly increased an hundred fold S. he found an hundreth fold caet v. 14. much tillage georgia S. a great family or houshold caet guabudah signifieth both v. 17. in the brooke of Gerar. H.C. in the valley of Gerar. caet nachal signifieth both a valley is more proper because they digged there v. 20 21 22. Heseck Sitâ—ah Rehoboth G.T.P. contention enmity roomth H.S.C.B. v. 25. there Isaacks servants digged a well in the valley of Gerar. S. v. 26. accompanied with his friend C. with Ahuzzah his friend caet v. 28. let the oath be confirmed that was betweene our fathers C. let there be now an oath betweene us caeter v. 33. he called it abundance H. an oath S. he called Shibah caet v. 35. they were rebellious against Isaack and Rebeckah C.B. they offended or were a griefe of minde caet heb bitternesse of Spirit 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QVEST. I. Whether this Abimelech were the same with whom Abraham had to deale Vers. 1. ANd there was a famine in the land c. 1. This other famine in Abrahams time was that famine mentioned chap. 12. where Abraham went downe into Aegypt Mercer for chap. 20. when Abraham sojourned in Gerar there is no famine spoken of which Pererius supposeth to have beene the cause of Abrahams going thither 2. This Abimelech might be either the same with whom Abraham had to deale who might bee now not above an hundred yeare old or another King of that name for the Kings of Gerar were called by the name of Abimelech as the Kings of Aegypt Pharaohs Phicol also might be the name of office or the same man might serve the father and sonne Mercer 3. Therefore we need not with Augustine quaest 75. in Genes to thinke this story to have beene done long before and to be set downe by way of recapitulation for it seemeth that Abraham was now
his friends as Onkelos Lyranus Tostat. 3. Abimelech commeth a farre journey not of love or good will but partly pricked in conscience for the wrongs which he had offered to Isaack Chrysost. hom 52. in Gen. partly providing for their posterity that Isaack would doe them no hurt Mercer 4. Origen by these three that came to Isaack understandeth the tripartite wisdome of the Gentiles the morall naturall rationall which dissenting at the first from the Christian faith were afterward reconciled to it hom 14. in Genes QUEST XIII Why Isaack made a feast to Abimelech and his company Vers. 3. HE made them a feast 1. Isaack did this of a simple and sincere affection that they might know there remained no grudge or purpose of revenge in his minde for to invite unto feasts is a signe of remitting and forgetting of former wrongs as Augustus Caesar did bid Catullus the railing Poet to supper in token he had forgiven him though Alexander dissemblingly brought Philotas to his table to have the better opportunity to murther him as Absolom served his brother Ammon 2. Some thinke that the next morning the oath before betweene them made was againe ratified Mer. But it is more like that the oath was deferred till the next morning as being the fittest time for serious consultations it was the Persians barbarous manner in the middest of their cups to advise of their weightiest affaires Perer. QUEST XIV Wherefore the well is called Shibah Vers. 33. SO he called it Shiba 1. Some interpret this word abundance or saturity because of the plenty of water that was found as Hierome who findeth fault with the Septuagint because they translate it oath But sabang signifieth to abound not shabang which is here used 2. It is more like that this was both the same well which Abraham digged and the same name derived from the oath which was made betweene Isaack and Abimelech as before betweene Abraham and Abimelech for so this story saith that Isaack gave them the same names which his father gave them vers 18. Mercer Calvin QUEST XV. Of the marriage of Esau. Vers. 34. WHen Esau was forty yeare old c. 1. The Hebrewes thinke that Esau till hee was forty yeare old gave himselfe to a vitious and a licentious life which may well be and that to imitate his father who was married at forty he doth the like 2. This his marrying into the flocke of Canaan was abdicationis praeludium a fore-runner of his casting off and missing of the blessing as it followeth in the next Chapter Calvin 3. Tostatus thinketh that in the forty yeare of Esau which was the hundred of Isaack Sem died but Pererius thinking to correct his oversight falleth into a greater errour referring the death of Sem to the 50. of Esau and 100. of Isaack whereas they are both in a great errour for Sem died in the 50. yeare of Isaacks life 60. yeare before this time which was 502. yeares after the floud QUEST XVI The evill qualities of Esau his wives Vers. 35. THey were a griefe of minde 1. Some read rebellious of marah to rebell sic Chald. But it rather commeth of marra to be bitter 2. And so were the wives of Esau bitter unto Isaack and Rebeckah and a great offence of mind unto them both in respect of their corrupt manners and their divers profession being given to idolatry as the Canaanites were Tharg Hierosol 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God maketh rich Vers. 12. THe Lord blessed him Gods blessing is given as a reason of Isaacks increasing and growing rich whereupon Augustine noteth Etiam ipsa bona temporalia nec dari posse nec sperari debere c. nisi ab uno Deo That these temporall goods cannot be given or hoped for but from the only God quast 76. in Genes as the wise man saith Prov. 10.22 The blessing of the Lord maketh rich 2. Doct. The soules of the righteous live with God Vers. 24. I Am the God of Abraham Abraham was now dead and yet the Lord professeth himselfe to be his God whereby we are taught that the soules of the righteous after this life doe live with God for as our Saviour saith He is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 Muscul. 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against the breaking of covenants Vers. 15. THe Philistims filled all the wels c. Though that Abimelech had made a covenant with Abraham concerning the well Gen. 21.30 yet after Abrahams death they goe from the covenant such are the enemies of the Church of whom the Prophet speaketh Isa. 33.8 He hath broken the covenant c. he regardeth no man such are the Romanists which hold that faith is not to be kept with heretikes as they brake the safe conduct granted to Iohn Hus and Hierome of Prage Mercer 2. Confut. Of restoring the ancient doctrine with the ancient names Vers. 18. HE gave them the same names which his father gave them The Philistims both stopped the ancient wels and abolished the names Isaack restoreth both so the Church of Rome hath abolished both the true ancient doctrine of the Sacraments as also taken away the name thereof calling it by an idolatrous name of their owne invention of the Masse Muscul. We therefore with Isaack have restored the pure doctrine of the ancient primitive Church together with the names as the Communion the Lords supper the Lords day c. As the Prophet saith Aske for the old way which is the good way and walke therein Ierem. 6.16 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Not to imitate our fathers infirmities Vers. 7. HE said she is my sister Abraham before had offended in the same kinde and yet Isaack cannot take heed so apt children are to imitate the infirmities of their parents Mercer But we should rather learne to decline from our parents errings as the Prophet saith If he beget a sonne that seeth all his fathers sinnes c. and feareth neither doth the like c. Ezek. 18.14 2. Observ. The punishment of adultery Vers. 11. HE that toucheth this man or his wife shall dye the death Thus by the light of nature they were taught that adultery was a grievous sinne and Abimelech pronounceth the sentence of death against such as should violate another mans wife as the Lord had said before to Abimelech Thou art but dead because of the woman which thou hast taken Genes 20. vers 3. 3. Observ. Adversity and prosperity tempered together Vers. 12. ISaack sowed c. Thus the Lord tempereth adversity and prosperity sorrow and joy together like as the night and day summer and winter doe one succeed another Isaack after these grievous tentations concerning his wife is increased and blessed of God likewise vers 20. when his servants had strived for two wels they peaceably enjoy the third calling it Rehoboth roomth as the Psalme saith Weeping may abide in the evening but joy commeth in the morning Psal.
people of God had speciall prerogative in blessing as Isaack Iacob Moses c. Perer. 5. Esau doth not desire a peece onely of the blessing Isaack having made mention of two blessings vers 37. his preeminence over his brethren and abundance of wheat and wine the Hebrewes thinke that Esau yeelded the preeminence but desired the other to be given him neither doth he desire to be partaker with his brother in his blessing or to have some other blessing given him as Perer. But he coveteth the whole blessing both envying that his brother should be preferred before him Philo. and of a lightnesse of minde thinking that the blessing might be reversed Mercer QUEST XVIII Of Esaus teares that they found no repentance Vers. 38. ESau lift up his voice and wept c. 1. Whereas the Apostle Heb. 12. saith hereupon that Esau found no place of repentance though he sought it with teares it is not understood of Esaus repentance as Thom. Aquin. expoundeth which because it was rather for a temporall losse than for his sinnes tooke no place But the Apostle meaneth that Isaack repented not of that which he had done to Iacob notwithstanding Esaus teares in like sense the gifts of God are said to be without repentance Rom. 11.29 that is God doth not repent to change his decree sic Beza ex nostris Cajetan Perer. 2. Where the Apostle saith he was rejected he meaneth from the greater blessing which belonged to the birth-right and inheritance for Esau obtained of his father the smaller blessing 3. Esaus teares proceeded of envie toward his brother not of any true sorrow for he doth not acknowledge any fault in himselfe but layeth all the fault upon his brother vers 36. and beside he upon this hated his brother and purposed to kill him vers 41. which is not the fruit of true repentance and therefore it is no marvell that it was not accepted with God Calvin QUEST XIX Of the blessing which Isaack gave to Esau. Vers. 39. BEhold the fatnesse of the earth c. Isaack indueth Esau also with a temporall blessing but with some restraint 1. First here is omitted plenty of wheat and wine which was given before to Iacob whereby is signified that Esaus Countrey should not abound with such plenty as Iacobs Perer. 2. In Iacobs blessing it was added God give thee of the dew of heaven but here no mention is made of God so the meaning is that Iacobs posterity should depend upon God for these externall blessings so should not Esaus race Mercer 3. There is a spirituall blessing pronounced to Iacob they shall be blessed that blesse thee which is omitted here 4. Where the Prophet saith I hated Esau and made his mountaines waste Malach. 1.3 Idumea was a desart and barren Countrey in respect of Canaan yet in it selfe it was not void of some fatnesse and fruitfulnesse as here Isaack promiseth Calvin QUEST XX. Of Esaus subjection to Iacob and the casting off of his yoke Vers. 4. BY thy sword shalt thou live c. 1. That is both Esau should get his living by the sword Mercer and his posterity the Idumeans should bee a savage and cruell people Calvin 2. He should serve his brother which came to passe in their posterity seven hundred yeares after this prophecie in Davids time who subdued Edom and put garrisons there 2. Sam. 8.14 Ambrose noteth this for a benefit that Esau was made Iacobs servant Intemperanti prâ—fecit sobrium prudenti imprudentem statuit obedire He set the sober over the intemperate and appointed the foolish to serve the wise lib. 2. de Iacob c. 3. 3. Thou shalt get the mastery some translate when thou hast mourned and referre it to that heavy chance when the idolatrous King of Moab sacrificed the King of Edoms sonne and not long after the Edomites shaked off the yoke of the Israelites sic Iun in hunc locum which reading is better for the word here used eu hiphel signifieth to mourne or to be humbled as Psal. 55.2 I mourne in my prayer the Edomites after they had served Israel some foure hundred and fifteene years in the dayes of Ioram Iehosophats son they departed from Iuda and made them a King of their owne 2 King 8.20 and in this liberty they continued eight hundred yeares till the time of Hircanus who subdued them and made them to be circumcised But after this Herod the sonne of Antipater an Idumean obtained to be King of the Jewes so that in him also after a sort the Edomites got the mastery over Iudah Perer. QUEST XXIII Of Esaus purpose to kill Iacob Vers. 41. THe dayes of mourning for my father c. 1. That which joyned and reconciled Ismael and Isaack the death and buriall of Abraham doth encourage Esau to kill his brother Muscul. 2. Yet it was but a fained mourning which he would afford his father seeing he purposed to slay his brother Calvin 3. He would not doe it so long as his father lived lest he should accurse him and deprive him of all blessings so he refrained for feare not of conscience Mercer 4. He onely maketh mention of mourning for his father it should seeme that he little regarded his mother whom he ought equally to have reverenced Perer. QUEST XXIV How Rebeccah knew of Esau his bloudy purpose Vers. 42. IT was told Rebeckah 1. Though it be said that Esau thought in his minde to kill Iacob yet it is like that hee could not conceale or dissemble his murderous heart but uttered it in the hearing of his wives or some other by which meanes it is more like it came to Rebeckahs knowledge than by revelation as Augustine thinketh because the words are it was told or reported to Rebeckah Mercer 2. She called Iacob or sent for him who as the Hebrewes thinke had hid himselfe for feare of his brother 3. Esau his hatred was such that he could not be satisfied nor comforted but by the death of Iacob thinking then to recover his birth-right againe QUEST XXV Of Rebeccahs counsell given to Iacob to escape away Vers. 44. TArrie there a few dayes c. 1. Yet Iacob stayed twenty yeares a longer time than Rebeckah supposed of which long stay the frowardnesse of Laban was a cause some thinke because of these words it is said of Iacob when he had served seven yeares for Rachel they seemed unto him but a few dayes c. Gen. 29.20 yet not his mothers words but the love of Rachel made that time seeme so short Mercer 2. She thinketh that Iacobs absence and the continuance of time would allay Esaus implacable wrath some mens anger is soone kindled and as soone abated such Aristotle calleth Acrechiólous extreme chollericke men others doe keepe wrath long whom he nameth Picrochiólous of their bitter choller and such was Esau his anger 3. Rebeccah promiseth to send for Iacob which the Hebrewes thinke she performed in sending her nurse Deborah to him which died in Iacobs house after
that because they suffered in earth they should there also bee rewarded but as the Israelites were afflicted in Egypt and recompensed in Canaan so the faithfull for their travell and labour in the earth shall finde rest in heaven 5. Confut. Obedience for feare of punishment not commendable Vers. 41. THe dayes of mourning for my father will come shortly c. Esau forbeareth a while from slaying his brother not of any conscience but for feare of his fathers curse displeasure we see then that obedience which is caused for feare of punishment is but a forced obedience nor of any acceptance with God which notwithstanding is so much commended of the Papists Calvin Saint Paul saith Love is the fulfilling of the Law Rom. 13.10 they then which doe not yeeld their service of love doe not keepe and fulfill the Law 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. The meditation of death profitable Vers. 2. I Know not the day of my death The ignorance of the time of our end ought to stirre us up to watchfulnesse and to make all things strait with God and the world as here Isaack resolveth to hasten the blessing of his sonne because of the uncertainty of his end Muscul. for our Saviour exhorteth us to watch because we know not when the Master of the house will come Mark 13.35 2. Observ. Parents curse how much to be feared Vers. 12. SO shall I bring a curse upon mee and not a blessing c. Iacob is afraid to purchase his fathers curse whereunto the Scripture attributeth much we read how heavie Noahs curse was upon Cham Augustine reporteth a strange story of a woman of Caesarea in Cappadocia who after the death of her husband receiving wrong at the hand of her children which were ten in number seven sonnes and three daughters accursed them all whereupon presently they were all stricken with a shaking and trembling of all their parts and for shame they dispersed themselves into divers Countries of which number two Pallus and Paladia a brother and sister came to Hippo Lib. 27. de Civit. Dei cap. 8. 3. Observ. God must be sought and flied unto in time Vers. 34. BLesse me also my father c. Esau came too late for the blessing which was bestowed before and he comming out of time another having prevented him could not obtaine it no not with teares we must seeke the Lord therefore in time and enter in while the doore is open lest if we stay till the doore be shut upon us we remaine without so the Prophet saith Seeke the Lord while he may be found call upon him while he is neare Isay 55.6 Calvin 4. Observ. Outward blessings common to the just and unjust Vers. 39. THe fatnesse of the earth shall be thy dwelling c. Esau is blessed with temporall gifts as the fatnesse of the earth as Iacob was before so that wee see that these externall blessings of the world are granted as well to the ungodly as the righteous as our Saviour saith That God sendeth raine upon the just and unjust Matth. 5.45 Perer. Which teacheth us that we should not much care for these outward things but desire the best and more principall gifts 5. Observ. Persecution for righteousnesse sake Vers. 43. FLee to Haran c. Iacob is constrained to flee and shift for himselfe because of the blessing so while the faithfull doe seeke for the Kingdome of heaven and spirituall things they must make account to finde hard entertainment in the world Calvin But Christ hath given us a comfort Blessed are they which suffer persecution for righteousnesse sake Matth. 5.10 6. Observ. Gods promises to be expected with patience FUrther whereas Iacob which hath the blessing is driven from his fathers house and is constrained to serve twenty years under an hard master and Esau in the meane time had the rule of his fathers house prospered and became a mighty man and yet for all this neither Rebeckah nor Iacob despaired of Gods promise or doubted of the blessing it teacheth us that although the wicked doe for a while flourish in the world we should not doubt but that God in his good time will performe his promise toward his Mercer 7. Observ. Injuries must first be forgotten and then forgiven Vers. 45. TIll thy brothers wrath be turned away c. and he forget c. The forgetfulnesse of wrongs bringeth forth forgivenesse but where injuries are remembred they are hardly remitted Muscul. We must therefore forget and then forgive as Ioseph did forget all the wrongs that his brethren did unto him and considered how the Lord turned it to his good Gen. 50.20 8. Observ. Wives must not exasperate or provoke their husbands Vers. 46. I Am weary of my life for the daughters of Hoth Rebeckah as a wise and discreet woman not willing to grieve her husband concealeth from him the malicious hatred of Esau toward Iacob and pretendeth another cause of sending away Iacob namely to provide him a wife from her owne kindred and not to match into so wicked a race as Esau had done Mercer By which example women should learne that as their husbands ought not to be bitter to them so they againe should not exasperate their husbands with quicke words or froward deeds as Sarah obeyed Abraham and called him Lord 1 Pet. 3.6 she did with milde and dutifull words seeke to please him CHAP. XXVIII 1. The Argument and Contents FIrst Isaacks charge to Iacob concerning his marriage and his blessing are set forth vers 1.5 2. Esau his hypocrisie who to please his father taketh a wife from Ismaels house vers 6. to 10. 3. Gods providence is declared in a vision to Iacob how the Lord promised to bee with him and to conduct him vers 10. to 16. 4. Iacobs feare devotion and vow are expressed vers 16. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 2. Into Mesopotamia of Syria H.C. Mesopotamia S.B. Padan of Syria T. Padan Aram. G.P. v. 4. Which God promised to thy grand-father H. which God gave to Abraham cater v. 5. Rebeckah his mother H. the mother of Iacob and Esau. cater v. 8. Proving that his father did not willingly looke upon the daughters of Canaan H. Esau saw that the daughters of Canaan displeased or seemed evill in the sight of Isaack his father cater v. 9. Melech the daughter of Ismael H. Mahalath caet v. 13. The Lord leaned upon the ladder H. the glory of God stood upon it C. the Lord stood above it cater v. 13. Feare not S. the rest have not these words v. 14. For thee and for thy children shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed C. in thee and thy seed cater v. 16. In truth the glory of God dwelleth in this place C. truly the Lord is in this place cat v. 17. This is no common place but a place wherein God is pleased and over against this place is the gate of heaven C. this is no other
was not 〈◊〉 off from the place where Iacob kept his sheep◠whence hee sent for his 〈◊〉 into the 〈◊〉 vers 4. and therefore it could be little lesse than 3. dayes journey from Laban who is 〈◊〉 like for 〈◊〉 haste and expedition to take his journey from the place whither the 〈◊〉 was brought him 3. Though Iacob was six dayes journey before Laban he might well overtake him in seven dayes 〈…〉 was encumbred with his children and cattell and could not drive fast and for that hee had pitched his tents in Gilead there purposing to refresh himselfe supposing the danger and feare of Labans pursuit to be over Mercer QUEST XII How Laban is charged neither to speake good or evill Vers. 24. TAke heed thou speake not ought save good c. The Hebrew phrase is from good to evill 1. Which is not to begin with good words and end with evill as Onkelos seemeth to take it 2. Nor yet is he forbidden only not to speak evil as the Latine and Septuagint with others 3. But he is forbidden to speak any thing at all either good or bad either faire words or soule not simply but concerning Iacobs returne againe into Mesopotamia and so Laban accordingly forbeareth to speake any thing at all of that matter the like phrase is used Gen. 24.50 Mercer Iun. QUEST XIII When God appeared to Laban and where he pitched his tents Vers. 25. THen Laban overtooke Iacob 1. This vision which Laban had was not in the beginning of his journey as some thinke but in the same night that he came to Gilead for so he saith Yesternight or the last night for so the word cemesh signifieth the God of your Father appeared unto me when he was now purposed to bee revenged of Iacob the Lord staied him 2. They pitched their tents both in the same mount not farre asunder some say Iacob was in the top of the hill Laban in the bottome some affirme the contrary but this is uncertaine Mercer It is most like that Iacob seeing Laban to approach set himselfe in as good order as he could doubting the worst Muscul. QUEST XIV How Iacob saith let him not live Vers. 32. WIth whom thou findest thy gods let him not live c. 1. Not as though he should say I will kill him with mine owne hand 2. Neither by vertue of this curse as the Hebrewes note did Rachel afterward dye an untimely death for Iacob knew not that she had them 3. But either they are words of imprecation whereby Iacob wisheth that God would shew his judgements upon him that had committed that theft Mercer Or else he giveth power to Laban even to take away their life Calvin QUEST XV. Of the divers takings of the word brother in Scripture SEarch before our brethren 1. Hierome noteth that the word brother is foure wayes taken in Scripture 1. For them that are so by nature and properly as Iacob and Esau were brethren 2. For them of the same nation as the Israelites were all brethren Act. 7.26 3. They that were of one kindred were called brethren as Abraham saith to Lot Wee are brethren Genes 13.8 4. They that are of the same Christian faith and profession 1 Cor. 5.11 If any that is called a brother c. 2. By brethren here wee understand not with Hierome Iacobs children which were yet of small discretion Ruben the eldest not being above 13. yeare old nor yet some other of his wives kindred that Iacob brought away with him out of Mesopotamia for they had beene no competent Judges in this case but the brethren were those whom Laban brought with him of his kindred vers 23. to whom Iacob referreth the judgement of this matter Mercer QUEST XVI Of the order in Labans searching of the tents Vers. 33. THen came Laban into Iacobs tent 1. Neither as Rasi thinketh had Iacob and Rachel one tent for the text sheweth that Laban went first into Iacobs tent and then into Leahs and from thence to Rachels 2. Though last mention bee made of Rachels tent that is because there the idols were hid Laban last of all searched the maids tents and out of Leahs tent he went into Rachels Mercer QUEST XVII Of Rachels excuse Vers. 35. THe custome of women is upon me 1. Not that women while their monethly custome is upon them are not able to rise but many times they are beside that infirmity troubled with the head-ake and are stomacke-sicke and not fit to be disquieted 2. As also they counted women in that case in times past uncleane they would neither talke with them nor suffer them to breathe upon them which might be the cause that Laban answereth not a word to his daughter but goeth presently out of her tent hereof the word niddah that signifieth an uncleane woman is derived of nadah which is to remove or send farre off because women at that season were separated from the company of others Mercer 3. Rachel made this excuse not either in detestation of the Idols vouchsafing them no better place than the Camels litter nor yet so much of love to keepe them as of feare because of the present danger in the meane time Laban by this excuse was blinded and deluded QUEST XVIII Whom Iacob meaneth by the feare of Isaack Vers. 42. THe feare of Isaack 1. Iacob neither meaneth that feare of Isaack when his father would have offered him up in sacrifice as some interpret for that was but a naturall feare of death for his patience and obedience was more commendable at that time than his feare 2. Neither doth Iacob speake of his owne feare and reverence toward his father 3. Nor yet of Isaacks feare or worship of God 4. Or of Isaacks feare and care for the prosperity of his sonne Iacob all these are here unproper to be matched with the God of Abraham 5. But feare is taken here not actively but passively for God himselfe that is feared Calvin who sometime is called by names effectivè in respect of the effect so is God called our strength our health salvation or objective by way of object so is God called our hope our love our joy our feare because he is the object of all these Perer. Rasi thinketh that hee is called not the God but feare of Isaack because Isaack was yet living and God doth not call himselfe by the living but this is a false note for Gen. 28.13 he is called the God of Isaack some doe in this difference of names note a distinction of the persons and understand the God of Abraham to bee the father the feare of Isaack to be Christ of whom he was a speciall type This collection may bee admitted Mercer So then by the feare of Isaack Iacob meaneth the God whom Isaack feared and worshipped having a reference to that feare also whereby Isaack was restrained from revoking the blessing given to Iacob Gen. 27.33 QUEST XIX Of the Syrian name which Laban gave and of the use
them after him to keepe the way of the Lord for which care the Lord himselfe commendeth him Gen. 18.19 than either Nachor or Esau had and therefore it is not unlike but that Iobs great knowledge was the fruits of Abrahams instruction propagated to his posterity QUEST XV. In what time Iob lived COncerning the time wherein Iob lived 1. He was neither so ancient as Iacob which seemeth to bee the opinion of Philo who thinketh that Dinah Iacobs daughter was Iobs wife for Eliphaz the Temanite of Teman of Eliphaz of Esau the third from Esau one of Iobs friends will make him after Iacobs time 2. Neither was Iob in the time of Moses which must be the opinion of Hierome who maketh Eliâ—u to be Balaâ—m 3. Much lesse lived he in the time of the judges as Gregorie thinketh for at such time as Iob lived who is commended for offering sacrifice the sacrificing priesthood was not instituted 4. Wherefore it is probable that Iob lived in the time of the Israelites being in Egypt after the death of Ioseph before the birth of Moses when Sathan compassed the earth and it was a rare thing to finde a righteous man for Moses is held to be the writer of the booke of Iob and as Eliphaz of Teman of Eliphaz of Esau of Isaack of Abraham was the sixt from Abraham so might Iob be in another line QUEST XVI Of Baal-hanan the seventh king of Edom. Vers. 38. BAâ—l-hanan the sonne of Achbor c. In that the city or country of this Baal-hanan is not expressed as of the rest 1. Some thinke it is omitted because he was of the same city of the which was the king next before named 2. Some because he had many adversaries and therefore had no certaine place 3. Some as Ramban that Hanan was his citie and so he is called Baal-hanan that is Lord of Hanan 4. But it may be that he was not so famous as the rest and therefore his citie is not noted Mercer QUEST XVII Of Mehetabel the wife of Hadad Vers. 39. MEhetabel the daughter of Matred the daughter of Mezabâ—h c. 1. Some thinke that Matred was her father Mezabah her mother 2. Some as R. Levi will have her the naturall daughter of Matred and the adopted daughter of Mezabah 3. Some thinke that Mezabah was the name of the place otherwise called Medeba or with Ptolome Medava Iun. but this seemeth to be somewhat coact and strained that she should be called the daughter of such a citie or towne 4. Therefore she is said to be the daughter of Matred her father not mother and daughter that is niece of her grand-father as Aholibamah before is said to be the daughter of Anah and daughter that is niece of Sibeon Mercer 5. Mezabah signifieth golden waters it might be that he was inriched by such waters where gold was gathered Matred also is interpreted one that is diligent or conversant in his worke of the word tared from whence some thinke the name Mithridates to be derived Mehetabel that is doing wel or giving unto God of the same signification with the name Theodosâ—â— Mercer QUEST XVIII Of the Dukes of Edom. Vers. 41. DVke Timna c. Duke Aholibamah 1. As the principality of Edom began with Dukes and rose to Kings so it returneth to Dukes againe who did not one succeed another as the Kings but they were all rulers together in divers places of Edom after the death of Hadad in Moses time 1 Chron. 1.51 2. These are not here the names of women as thinketh Aben Ezra that first the Dukes are named that came of Timna then those which came of Aholibamah neither are they the names of men Iun. but rather of the places called by the names of their first mothers where these Dukes had their seat Mercer Muscul. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The prosperity of the wicked of short continuance Vers. 32. THese are the Kings that reigned c. The wicked are soone raised to honour and are quickly cast downe againe as Esaus posterity was speedily advanced to a Kingdome but it continued not long Iacobs seed though a long time kept under in affliction yet at the last obtained a firme and permanent Kingdome such is the condition of the elect though of a long time their happinesse appeareth not yet when it breaketh forth it hath a durable continuance but the prosperity of the wicked soone fadeth away therefore they are said to be set in flippery places and they are as a dreame when one awaketh Psal. 73.18.20 Mercer 2. Doct. Alteration of states in the hand of God FUrther whereas first the Horites dwelt in mount Seir and had divers Dukedomes and Principalities there and after them the Edomites were first Dukes then Kings then Dukes againe wee see that the alteration of states transplanting and changing of Kingdomes is in the Lords hand it is God that maketh low and maketh high Psal. 75.7 Muscul. 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Outward prosperity no sure note of the Church Vers. 32. THese are the Kings that reigned in Edom c. There were divers Kings in Edom before any reigned in Israel yet was not Edom the Church of God but Israel prosperity then and outward glory is no sure note of the true Church as the Papists make it Luther For then Moses would not have chosen to suffer affliction with the people of God and have refused the glory pompe and pleasure of Pharaohs Court Heb. 11.25 2. Confut. Against the Iewes that Magdiel is not Rome Vers. 43. DVke Magdiel the Hebrewes take this for Rome because they thinke that the Romans came of the Idumeans but they have no reason for it spiritually indeed the Romanists and all other enemies to the Church of God may be counted Idumeans But otherwise there was no affinity betweene Rome and Idumea being so farre distant Magdiel was a place in Edom as Timna and Teman and the rest were It signifieth annuntians Deum praising or confessing God in which sense it were happy for Rome now spirituall Babylon if she could truly be called Magdiel 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. God blesseth the seed of the righteous for their fathers sakes Vers. 15. THese were the Dukes of the sonnes of Esau c. As Ismael was temporally blessed for Abrahams sake so was Esau for Isaacks sake his posterity was renowned and honourable Thus the Lord often vouchsafeth temporall and outward favours even to the degeneraâ—e seed for their righteous forefathers sake as the Lord would not take away the whole Kingdome from Rehoboam that David still might have a light in Jerusalem 1 King 11.36 2. Observ. The wicked void of naturall affection Vers. 20. THese are the sonnes of Seir the Horite c. Esau was by marriage allied to this Seir for hee married Aholibamah neeâ—e to Sibeon the third sonne of Seir Gen. 36.2.20 yet the children of Esau chased away the Horims and destroyed them and dwelt in their stead
can save and destroy Iam 4.12 Onely God that gave unto man his life hath power to take it away and therefore otherwise than God hath given direction either by particular precept or generall rule the life of man is not to bee taken away 3. And seeing Magistrates are but Gods Ministers Rom. 13.4 they must execute justice according to his will for it is required of a disposer that he bee found faithfull 1. Cor. 4.2 but Gods will otherwise appeareth not than in his word 4. And seeing whatsoever is not of faith that is firme perswasion is sinne Rom. 14.23 and faith must be grounded upon the word as being wrought by the word Rom 10.17 how can the Magistrate approve his acts of justice as in the sight of God unlesse hee can warrant the same by the word 2. Neither yet can I consent with those which thinke that the punishment inflicted by Moses for the breach of the morall law together with the morall law is imposed upon Christian Magistrates as it is not lawfull to punish adulterie otherwise than by death nor simple theft by death but by restitution Piscator praefation in Exod. for if this were so then the Gospell should overthrow the policie and institution of divers Common-wealths which of a long time have continued but God is the author of peace not of confusion 1. Cor. 14.33 2. Mardoche and Daniel having place of government under the Persian Kings did no doubt minister justice according to the lawes of that countrey 3. Our Saviour Christ commanding to give tribute to Caesar and injoyning obedience to the higher powers which did beare the sword and that for conscience sake Rom. 13. seeme to give approbation to the lawes of nations maintaining right and tending to equity 4. Our Saviour himselfe observed not the judicials belonging to the morall law for whereas he that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath was stoned to death by Moses yet out Saviour excuseth and defendeth his Apostles who did as much as the other in rubbing the eares of corne for their necessity Matth. 12. yea hee giveth a rule that for fornication onely and adulterie it was lawfull for a man to put away his wife Matth. 19. which exception needed not if either in fact then or in right afterward adulterers and adulteresses were to bee punished by death If it be answered that Christ tooke not upon him the office of the Civill Magistrate to impose corporall punishment yet would not our Saviour have defended his Apostles nor yet by silence have left them unreproved for neglect of the law 3. Wherefore the best resolution is that the morall judicials of Moses do partly bind and partly are left free they do not hold affirmatively that we are tied to the same severity of punishment now which was inflicted then but negatively they doe hold that now the punishment of death should not be adjudged where sentence of death is not given by Moses Christian Magistrates ruling now under Christ the Prince of peace Isai. 9. that is of clemencie mercie may abate of the severitie of Moses law mitigate the punishment of death but they cannot adde unto it to make the burthen more heavie to shew more rigour than Moses becommeth not the Gospell to extend more favour is not unbeseeming of these two assertions my reasons are as followeth 1. That which Ambrose urgeth out of the mouth of Luke how our Saviour reproveth his Disciples because they would have had fire come downe upon the Samaritanes upon the which example hee thus inferreth Ostenditur nobis non semper in eos qui peecaverunt vindicandum quia nonnunquam amplius prodest clementia tibi ad patientiam lapso ad correctionem It is shewed us that alwayes vengeance is not to bee taken of those that offend because oftentimes clemencie is more profitable for patience in thee and amendement in the offender And this collection is ratified by the answer of our Saviour in that place The Sonne of man is not come to destroy mens lives but to sâ—ve them Luk. 9.55 2. Augustine urgeth the example of Christ who suffered the woman taken in adâ—â—tery to escape without punishment of death Ioh. 8. Whereupon hee inferreth that the adulter◠〈◊〉 not now to bee put to death but to live rather to be reconciled to her husband or to come 〈…〉 the usuall answer is that our Saviour doth not here abrogate the Law against adultery 〈◊〉 only to meddle with the Magistrates office Piscator Ans. Neither doe wee say that Christ abrogateth that law but leaveth it free and taketh away the necessitie of it And though Christ exercised not the Magistrates office in his owne person yet in this case it had not beene impertinent to have given direction to have her before the Magistrate as in another case he sendeth the leper to the Priest Matth. 8.4 if it had pleased him to impose still the severitie of the law yea our Saviour sheweth by his answer Let him that is amongst you without sinne cast the first stone at her Ioh. 8.7 that hee would not have them such strait executors of the rigour of Moses law upon others but rather to bee severe judges of themselves and with charitable affection to support the frailty of others to the which themselves were subject 3. Further the difference betweene the times of the Law and of the Gospell must be considered then they received the spirit of bondage to feare but now the spirit of adoption Rom. 8.15 then they which came neere the mount where the morall Law was given were stone or stricken thorow with darts whether man or beast Heb. 12.20 but it is not so now then the bloud of Abel cryed for vengeance but the bloud of Christ now calleth for mercie and so speaketh better things than that of Abel Heb. 12.24 Therefore to mitigate the severitie of Moses Law in some cases yet not leaving sinne unpunished nor by connivence cherishing the same it is more sutable to the profession of the Gospell of peace and mercie Wherefore I here say with Chrysostome Vbi paterfamilias largus est dispensator non debet esse tenax Where the master of the house is bountifull the steward must not be sparing Melius est propter misericordiam rationem reddere quà m propter crudelitatem It is better to be called to account for too much pitie than for cruelty 4. The continuall practice of the Church sheweth as much that the rigour of Moses judicials is mitigated S. Paul willeth the incestuous man only to be excommunicate 1. Cor. 5. it seemeth then there was no law in force to put such to death nor in Cyprians time who thus writeth Quidam episcopi in nostro provincia c. Some Bishops in our province have altogether shut up penance against adulterie Nor after that in the time of the Eliberin Councell which was held under the reigne of Constantine where it was decreed can 9. Moechatus post
what sex the infant was better than see them on their stooles G. them is added or see them in their birth time V.S. B. looke in the stooles A. P.H. that is into them the word abenim signifieth the stooles of women in travell so called of banim children T.P. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Why the twelve Patriarkes are so often rehearsed Vers. 1. THese are the names of the children of Israel The names of the twelve Patriarkes are so often rehearsed in Scripture 1. because of them came the twelve tribes the Priestly also and the Kingly order sprang from thence 2. And this mysticall number of twelve is used in Scripture to describe the spirituall state of the Church under Christ as twelve thousand are chosen out of every tribe Apoc. 7. and the new Jerusalem is set forth by the twelve gates and twelve foundations Apoc. 21. Simler 3. And to shew the truth and constancie of Gods promises in increasing the seed of Iacob of twelve fathers into so many thousands Pellican 4. And beside the dignitie and prerogative of the children of God herein appeareth who are chiefely remembred in Scripture where mention is made of the wicked it is by the way and as it were by accident and in a manner besides the proper intention of the Scripture Ferus QUEST II. Why Iacobs sonnes are not alwayes rehearsed in the same order Vers. 3. ISsachar Zebulon and Benjamin the Patriarkes are seldome rehearsed in the same order for Gen. 46. first Leahs children then her maide Zilpaehs then Rachels sonnes and lastly Bilhah her maides are numbred but here Benjamin Rachels sonne is set before the sonnes of the handmaides the like order is kept Genes 35. So Reuben is here named first but in the order of the campe Iudah hath the first place Num. 2. and when the spies are sent out Numb 13. another order is observed Simler The reasons hereof may be these 1. because in the old Testament for the most part the order of nature not of grace is followed for though Reuben were the eldest in birth yet Iudah had the regall preeminence Bor. 2. This is done that we should not be curious observers of numbers or mens nativities Pellican 3. The Patriarkes had now all received their fathers blessing and were incorporate into one holy people to shew therefore their equalitie and that there was no difference of the tribes before God sometimes one is named first sometime another Ferus 4. But here and Gen. 35. all the children of Iacobs wives as sonnes of free women are rehearsed before the sonnes of the maide servants Iun. Vatab. QUEST III. How they are said to be seventie soules that went downe with Iacob into Egypt Vers. 5. SO all the soules that came of Iacobs loynes were seventie 1. They were beside Iacob 66. with Iacob 67. with Ioseph his two sonnes 70. so then in this number Iacbos wives are not reckoned but onely those which came out of his loynes but Ioseph must be included and therefore it is added but Ioseph was in Egypt Iunius readeth cum Iosepho with Ioseph in the same sense 2. Whereas the Septuagint read 75. whom S. Luke followeth in Stephens storie Act. 7. because it was not safe to depart in a matter of number from the received translation Iunius thinketh that in that number all are comprehended beside Iacob that are rehearsed in that catalogue as Iacobs two wives Er and Onan which all make 75. But why should Iacob be left out in the number of 75. and included in the number of 70. and to what purpose should Er and Onan be comprehended in that summe seeing they were dead before and went not downe into Egypt But seeing the Septuag Gen. 46. doe rehearse five nephewes of Ioseph Machir and Gilead his sonne of Manasses Sutalam and Edem his sonne and Taam of Ephraim it is more like that S. Luke for the reason before alleaged therein followeth the Septuagint Aretius See more of this upon that question Gen. 46. QUEST IV. Of the wonderfull multiplying of the Israelites in Egypt 7. ANd the children of Israel fructified c. 1. The people increased exceedingly which is here expressed by foure words of like significations pâ—ru they fructified ijsrezu they brought forth in abundance as the fish ijrbu they were multiplied and jagghatzuus they waxed strong Simler 2. and so accordingly they multiplied that of 70. persons there came 700000. of every one tenne thousand Pellican Yea whereas above sixe hundred thousand of men able to goe to warre from twentie yeeres old and upward were numbred that came out of Egypt Numb 1.46 out of which number were excepted all the males under twentie and all the old men beside the women which were not so few as the men seeing it was not unusuall in those dayes for one man to have divers wives it may be supposed and is so judged by some that the whole number could not bee lesse than thirtie hundred thousand Perer. 3. QUEST V. In what time the Israelites so exceedingly increased FUrther this multiplying of the Israelites to take the longest time from the first going downe of Iacob to the returne of the Israelites thence was in the space of 215. yeeres Some thinke that the greatest increase was the first hundred yeere after that generation was dead vers 6. which is usually taken in Scripture for the space of an hundred yeeres Simler But there by that generation are understood onely the men of that age Vatab. Augustine taketh all the time after the death of Ioseph which Perer. counteth an 145. yeeres But the chiefe time of this increase was after Iosephs death before the time of their servitude how they increased also in the time of their bondage is declared afterward vers 12. Neither need this seeme strange that in the space of 215. yeeres the Israelites did so wonderfully increase seeing that forren authors doe write that Ninus who began to reigne 250. yeeres after the floud did lead in his armie against the Bactrianes 700. thousand footmen and two hundred thousand horsemen Diod. Sicul. lib. 3. cap. 2. ex Ctesia Perer. QUEST VI. By what meanes the Israelites increased HOw this wonderfull increase should be wrought 1. we neither need to thinke with Augustine that it was miraculous 2. nor with the Hebrewes to imagine that every one of them brought forth two or three at a birth Pellican For although it be often seene that women may have many at a birth as Aristotle maketh mention of one that had twentie at foure times five at every birth and that it is usuall in Egypt for the women to have two and three and sometimes five at a birth Trogus reporteth that in Egypt they bring forth sometimes seven at once Bor. yet this is not usually nor often seene 3. Therefore supposing as is most like that all the Hebrew women were very fruitfull that they bore betimes and were child-bearing long being not cut off by
untimely death or sicknesse it seemeth not unpossible that such a number by ordinarie meanes in the circuite of 215. yeeres might be multiplied for seventie persons in thirtie yeeres if they beget every one but one in a yeere will have 2100. Cut off the odde hundred and admit that the third part onely of the other number was apt for generation that is sixe hundred which make 300. couples or mariages those will beget in thirtie yeeres more which is the 60. yeere from their comming into Egypt nine thousand the third part hereof three thousand maketh fifteene hundred couples which having but every yeere one will beget the next thirtie yeeres which makes 90. in all 45000. hereof the third part 15000. will make 7400. couples leaving the odde hundred which will beget by the 12. yeere 222000. the third part whereof 74000. maketh 37000. couples and will beget by the 150. yeere 1110000 the third part hereof 370000. maketh 185000. mariages which will beget the next thirtie yeeres by the 180. yeere 5550000. whereof the third part 185000. which maketh beside the five odde thousand 920000. mariages which will beget by the 210. yeere 27600000. that is 27. thousand sixe hundred thousand Simler Though herein no miracle be admitted yet could it not be done without the exceeding blessing of God especially that notwithstanding their cruell bondage and sore labour yet they multiplied without number Perer. Somewhat about this time the children of Ephraim being increased went against the men of Gath to take away their cattell but presuming before the time they were slaine and Ephraim mourned for them 1 Chron. 7.21 Osiander QUEST VII Who this new King was that knew not Ioseph Vers. 8. THere arose a new King in Egypt 1. This new King was neither an Assyrian borne as Cajetano conjectureth upon these words of Isay chap. 52.4 My people went downe into Egypt to sojourne there and Asshur oppressed them without cause but the Prophet in this place toucheth both the oppressions of the Israelites in Egypt and under Asshur neither in the Egyptian Chronicles was there any Assyrian King either before Moses or for a thousand yeeres after till the reigne of Cambises the Persian 2. Neither could this King be Mephres in whose ninth yeere Ioseph should die and the bondage of Israel begin as Vincentius For seeing all the Patriarkes were dead before their affliction began of which number Levi elder than Ioseph by foure yeeres lived 137. yeeres Exod. 6. and so survived Ioseph who died at 110. yeeres 23. yeeres then could not Mephres be this King that began to reigne before Ioseph died 3. Neither was this King Ramesses as some thinke because one of the cities which the Israelites built was called by that name for Ramesses was King of Egypt in the time of the Trojane warre Plin. lib. 36. cap. 8. which was three hundred yeeres after the death of Moses if he reigned in Egypt in the time of Deborah as thinketh Eusebius he was 140. yeeres after Moses 4. But it is more probable that this King was Amemphis in whose 18. yeere Eusebius thinketh Moses was borne so also Hierome in Chronicis some call him Memnon the speaking stone whose image did use to speake at the Sunnes rise and so continued untill Christ Perer. Simler QUEST VIII Why this Pharaoh is called a new King HE is called a new King because he came of another family Ioseph or for that he brought in a new kind of government altering and changing the lawes as the Chalde Paraphrast and ruling after his owne pleasure Simler He knew not Ioseph either being borne after his time or having forgotten his benefits as Darius had Mardoches faithfulnesse Esther 6. Iunius Wherein his great ingratitude appeared for two great benefits Ioseph had procured one in generall in saving the whole land in the time of the famine the other to the Crowne in annexing to it the fift part of the revenewes of Egypt Perer. As also herein Iosephs modestie appeared that did not in his long time of honour which continued 80. yeeres raise up an honourable and wealthie state to his posteritie seeing his house was so soone obscured but as is most like he and his sonnes joyned themselves unto their brethren not hunting after the wealth of Egypt where they knew they were but strangers Simlerus QUEST IX The causes of the affliction of the Israelites Vers. 10. COme let us worke wisely with them c. 1. There were three causes why the Egyptians consulted to oppresse the Israelites first they envied their happinesse and prosperitie for God every way blessed them then they hated them for their religion in which regard the Hebrewes were an abomination to the Egyptians for they sacrificed those beasts which the Egyptians worshipped see Gen. 46.34 and Exod. 8.26 Thirdly they were afraid of them lest they should joyne with their enemies and rebell against them Perer. 2. And three things they feared lest they might take part with their enemies or rebell by their owne strength or make an escape out of the land Iun. They feared all these joyntly and every one in particular therefore it is better read disjunctively see before in the divers readings 3. They worke wisely or cunningly câ—â—ftily for so the word Chacham is taken both in the good bad part not as the Hebrewes imagine because they would not destroy them with the sword or fire lest God might be revenged of them in the same kind but devised by the water to destroy them whereby the Lord promised never to destroy the world againe but their craft is seene in attempting divers wayes to keepe them under that if they prevailed not by one meanes they might by another and in respect of themselves they worke wisely providing both for their owne securitie and for their profit in the service of the Israelites Simler Likewise they opprest them cunningly that they might not be accused of open and manifest tyrannie Osiander 4. Iosephus alleageth another cause of this affliction that about that time one of the Egyptian Priests foretold unto the King of one that should be borne who when hee once came to yeeres should worke much harme to the Egyptians and greatly exalt the people of Israel lib. 2. antiquit cap. 5. But this being his conjecture no such thing here insinuated by Moses may be more safely rejected than credited QUEST X. Of the hard affliction of the Israelites 12. THerefore they did set taskmasters over them c. 1. Divers wayes were the Israelites most grievously oppressed in Egypt 1. Philo writeth that they were caused to carrie burthens above their strength that they were forced to worke night and day that the same were constrained to be both workmen and servers they were employed in making brick digging and building insomuch that many of them died under their burthens and were not suffered to be buried and beside the most cruell men were set to be their taskmasters Phil. lib. 1. de vita Mosis 2.
Iosephus addeth further that the Israelites made ditches and trenches to convey the river and built the great Pyramides of bricke yea they carried the filth and dust out of the citie lib. 2. antiquit cap. 5. 3. Eusebius out of Eupolimus writeth that to make the Hebrewes more odious they were commanded to go otherwise apparelled than the Egyptians 4. But we need not seeke further than in the Scriptures as the businesse of their worke is set forth vers 14. they wrought in clay and bricke and in all manner of rurall workes Exod. 5. they were compelled to seeke straw themselves to make their bricke with and yet nothing was diminished of their daily taske if they failed their officers were beaten And therefore in respect of their hard servitude the Lord saith he brake the bands of their yoke Levit. 26.13 and tooke them out of the iron fornace Deut. 4.20 5. Thus the Egyptians three wayes kept them under they exacted of them tribute to empoverish their wealth Bor. they laid burthens upon them to weaken their bodies and by this meanes they thought to hinder their generation and increase Simler QUEST XI Of the cities Pithom and Rameses which the Israelites built for Pharaoh Vers. 11. ANd they built the cities of munition Pithom and Ruhumses 1. The word is Mischenoth which signifieth not Tabernacles as the Latine translation readeth being deceived as is like by the similitude of this word and succoth which signifieth Tabernacles most reade the cities of treasures as sochen is taken for a treasurer Isa. 22.15 the Hebrewes take them to bee granaries where the Egyptians laid up their store of corne which was the riches and treasure of Egypt so Vatablus readeth repositoria storehouses Lyranus thinketh they were called cities of treasures because they were so sure that they might serve for the keeping of treasure Oleaster deriveth the word of suchan to enclose or shut up as it is taken Psal. 139.3 Thou hast shut up all my wayes and so mischenoth should signifie places made to keepe or shut up any thing and in this sense they may be taken cities of defence inclosed with walles Pererius And so it is most likely that these were cities of munition as the Septuagint read and as the word is taken 1 King 9.19 sic Iun. 2. Pithom some thinke to bee the towne Butis or Buto at one of the mouths or dores of Nilus famous for the Oracle of Latona but it is rather the towne Patraion in the borders of Egypt toward Arabia Petraea whither reached the great ditch made from Nilus to the red Sea supposed to be the worke of the Israelites which Herodotus falsely ascribeth to Pharaoh Necho Iun. 3. The other citie Rahamses Tostatus thinketh to be the same with that in the land of Gosen mentioned Gen. 47.11 by anticipation not bearing then that name but so called when Moses wrote that booke Hierome thinketh that it is there the name of a Province here of the chiefe citie of the Province Perer. which is most like because the Israelites tooke their journey from Rameses but from one citie being so many they could not goe it seemeth by the Hebrew points to be a divers place from the other for that is called Rahmeses this Rahamses and so thinketh Iunius 4. The Septuagint beside these two cities make mention also in this place of On which is Heliopolis but this citie was not now built by the Israelites as Hierome well observeth seeing long before in the storie of Ioseph Pâ—tipherah is said to be the Prince of On and the Septuag Gen. 41. doe make it to be Heliopolis QUEST XII How many yeeres the affliction of the Israelites is supposed to have continued NOw concerning the continuance of the servitude of the Israelites 1. It was neither so long as Iosephus thinketh foure hundred yeeres for seeing the whole time of their being in Egypt could not be above foure hundred and thirtie yeeres Exod. 12.40 and Ioseph lived seventie yeeres after Iacobs comming into Egypt it would follow that this affliction began fourtie yeeres before Iosephs death and beside Iosephus is herein contrarie to himselfe who in the same booke lib. 2. antiquit maketh the whole time of the Israelites abode in Egypt but two hundred and fifteene yeeres 2. Neither yet was the time so long as Eusebius conjectureth 144. yeeres from the death of Ioseph for not onely Ioseph but the rest of that generation were dead before their oppression began of the which number was Levi who lived 23. yeeres after Ioseph for he was foure yeeres elder than he and lived 137. yeeres and Ioseph died at 110. yeeres 3. Neither is the conjecture of the Hebrewes certaine that the affliction tooke beginning at the death of Levi from whence to the going out of the Israelites were 122. yeeres or thereabout for not onely Levi but all of that generation were dead whereof some came very young into Egypt as Phares not then above a yeere old who is like to have survived Levi long ex Perer. 4. Nor yet did their servitude continue an hundred fifteene yeeres beginning after one hundred yeere of their being in Egypt which was a full generation Simler for Phares was of that generation who is likely to have exceeded an hundred yeeres 5. Wherefore seeing all that generation was first dead of the which Phares was one who being a yeere old at Iacobs comming into Egypt may be supposed to live according to the rate of the yeeres of mans life then which was about 130. as Levi lived 137. Kohath 133. Aaram 137. Exod. 6.16 20. then it will follow Phares age of 130. being subduced from 215. the time of the Israelites being in Egypt there will remaine about 86. or 87. yeeres of their affliction when the Hebrewes supposed Miriam Moses sister to have beene borne so called of the bitter affliction which was all her time ex Perer. QUEST XIII The reasons why the Lord suffered his poeple to be afflicted in Egypt WHy the Lord suffered his owne people to be thus hardly entreated 1. It was not chiefly or onely for their Idolatry which they learned and practised in Egypt as Thostatus thinketh Quest. 7. in Exod. For though it is like that they learned some corruption that way of the Egyptians as the Prophet sheweth that the breasts of their virginitie were pressed and they committed fornication in their youth in Egypt Esa 23.2 it appeareth by their setting up of the golden calfe which was a resemblance of the Egyptians god Apis yet it is not like that they practised Idolatrie while Ioseph lived nor generally were corrupted for then the Egyptians in all likelihood would not have so hated them if they had beene conformable unto them in their Idolatrous worship 2. Other reasons therefore may be better yeelded why the Lord suffered his people to be thus tried 1. That the Israelites should hate the impure manners and superstitions of Egypt 2. That by this meanes they
first common and usuall as a signe of griefe and mourning as David came to Jerusalem barefoote 2. Sam. 15.30 The second civill as by putting off the shooe they signified the yeelding up of their right as it is prescribed Deut. 25.9 and practised Ruth 4.7 The third was religious which betokened the putting off of earthly carnall thoughts and the preparing of the minde for spirituall things Iun. in Analys 2. This putting off the shooes 1. some say was commanded Moses that he thereby should sanctifie that place by making bare his feete but the place was holy already because of Gods presence the place was not holy because Moses put off his shooes but because it was holy Moses is bid to put off his shooes 2. Ambrose thus applieth it that because the shooes are made of the skinnes of dead beasts Moses should put off all feare of death for feare whereof hee fled at the first time from Pharaoh 3. Cyprian would have thereby signified that Moses by putting off his shooes doth not challenge any right in the spouse of the Church but resigneth it to Christ the head and husband thereof for this was the custome that the next kinsman by putting off the shooe did surrender his right in the brothers wife deceased unto the next after him Ruth 4. 3. Because the putting on of the shooes did betoken haste as the Israelites were commanded to eat the Passeover with their shooes upon their feete therefore the putting them off betokeneth the contrarie not in haste but with due preparation Moses should approach Perer. 4. But the most likely signification is that all carnall thoughts set apart Moses should draw neere with reverence and spirituall preparation Ferus as into the house of God Eccle. 4 17. QUEST X. Why the Lord called himselfe the God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob Vers. 6. I Am the God of thy father the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob 1. By thy father he meaneth Amram shewing that he was the God of them and of their seed and of all Israel being mindfull of his promise made to their fathers Simlerus 2. Abraham Isaac and Iacob are here named not so much in regard of their sanctity and excellent vertues for Abel Enoch and Noah were holy men in their time but for these causes are they especially named 1. Because to them specially were the promises made touching the land of Canaan 2. They were the next and immediate fathers of Israel 3. To them God more fully revealed himselfe and shewed his counsell 4. And principally for that those Patriarks had most evident prophesies of the Messiah as Abraham Gen. 22.18 that all the earth should be blessed in his seed and the same promise was renewed to Isaac Gen. 26.4 Iacob also prophesieth of the comming of the Messiah under the name of Shiloh 5. These three Patriarks are named to shew the efficacie of Gods promise made unto them the time now approching when they should see the accomplishment thereof Perer. 3. The name of God is thrice repeated and set before Abraham Isaac and Iacob both to expresse the mysterie of the Trinitie and to shew the speciall and particular care that God had of each of them being a gratious God unto them all and because unto them all were the promises made the certainty whereof by this repetition is insinuated Pererius QUEST XI Why Moses hid his face Vers. 6. THen Moses hid his face 1. For these causes wee find in Scripture that men have used to hide them for feare as Adam hid himselfe in Paradise for shamefastnesse as Rebeckah covered her selfe with the vaile when she saw Isaac Gen. 24. for reverence and humility as Elias covered his face when the Lord spake unto him 1. King 19. for weaknesse and impotencie as Moses face was covered from the Israelites because they were not able to behold the glory of his countenance Exod. 34. Perer. 2. For two of these causes Moses here covereth his face first as being guilty of his owne infirmity and weaknesse as being not able to behold the exceeding great glory of God as also of reverence Piscator 3. Moses is not mentioned here in direct words to have prayed or worshipped as wee read of others the servants of God when the Lord appeared unto them not that Moses either being astonished forgat it or disabled himselfe as not worthy but he inwardly in his soule adored the divine Majesty as the humility of his externall behaviour sheweth Simler QUEST XII How this text is alleaged by our Saviour in the Gospell to prove the resurrection of the dead NOw whereas our Saviour Christ Matth. 22. Mark 12. and Luk 20. alleageth this divine testimony I am the God of Abraham c. and inferreth thereupon he is the God of the living and not of the dead and so convinceth the Sadduces that held there was no resurrection the question is seeing that this scripture proveth onely the immortality of the soule which some of the Philosophers held and yet beleeved not the resurrection how this place was applied by our Saviour to prove the resurrection of the body First then it may bee answered that seeing Abraham Isaac and Iacob being departed out of this world are said to bee living unto God and these names were given unto them as consisting of soule and body this place sheweth that both their soules doe live actually with God and their bodies also in hope not being dead but onely asleepe Ireneus lib. 4. cap. 11. so also Chrysostome in 22. cap. Mat. 2. Some answer that by necessarie consequent the mortality of the soule being granted the resurrection of the body must follow because the soule naturally hath a desire to the body and cannot have true and full happinesse untill the bodie which was partaker of the labours and travels of this life with the soule bee made fellow also with it in joy which reason moved some of the Philosophers as the Pythagoreans and Platonists which held the soule to be immortall to dreame of the remigration and returne of the soule to the body thinking it impossible that the soule should for ever bee separated from the body sic Thomas lib. 4. contra Gent cap. 79. 3. But the best solution of all is Hieromes that against the Sadduces who denied the resurrection of the body onely for that they beleeved not the immortality of the soule it was a strong argument to convince them of error in denying the resurrection to take away the ground of their error in proving by this text the living and being of the soule this also is the solution of Cajetane QUEST XIII Why our Saviour specially urgeth this place against the Saduces FUrther though out of the old Testament divers other places might be alleaged more pregnant at the first sight than this to prove the resurrection of the dead as Hierome doth specially note that place Iob. 19. I know my redeemer liveth yet our Saviour maketh
his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1 Cor. 12.21
Pharaoh to vers 9. then a conclusion of the whole historie of these plagues 1. In the continuation there is set forth first the Lords speech with Moses both revealing unto him that one plague was behind vers 1. and repeating the first promise of inriching the Israelites by the Egyptians vers 2. where Moses inserteth the reason why this should bee effected because both the people in generall and Moses specially should bee gratious in the sight of Pharaoh and his people vers 3. And all this the Lord spake unto Moses before his last entrance to Pharaoh for after that hee saw not his face Then followeth the speech that Moses had with Pharaoh vers 4. to vers 9. where Moses in the name of God foretelleth first the last plague of the death of the first borne expressing the time about midnight and of whom the destruction shall bee of all the first borne of men from the highest to the lowest and of beasts and by whom The Lord shall goe out c. vers 4.5 Secondly the events are three first the lamentation and sorrow of the Egyptians vers 6. then the privilege and immunitie of the Israelites vers 7. and the entreatie and supplication of the Egyptians to Moses to be gone with his people vers 8. 2. In the conclusion of this historie there is first a repetition of that which God foretold Moses that Pharaoh would not heare him with the end thereof that Gods wonders might bee multiplied in Egypt vers 9. then the declaration of Moses obedience vers 10. and of the event that Pharaohs heart was hardned as the Lord had said and of the effects and fruits thereof the not letting of the people goe vers 10. 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. When he sendeth you away he will at once speedily drive you hence I. altogether drive you hence G.S.V. or at once drive you hence G But this expresseth not the emphasis of the Hebrew phrase in driving drive you out that is speedily when he shall let you go quite he shall utterly drive you hence B. but the word Calah altogether belongeth to the latter clause as may appeare by the distinction Vers. 2. That every man require of his companion A. P. or neighbour L. S. V. B. G. rather than friend I. the word reaâ— signifieth both but because the Egyptians were neighbours rather than friends and an other word is used chap. 3.22 shechenoth which signifieth a neighbour or neere dweller I preferre the first Vers. 3. Also the man Moses was very great A. P. C. S. V. I. better than Moses was a very great man L.B. for the word ish man is set before Moses or also Moses was very great G. for here man is altogether omitted Vers. 5. From the first borne of Pharaoh that should sit upon his throne I.C. rather than which sitteth upon his throne cater for he was the heire onely of the Kingdome he did not yet sit upon the throne Pharaoh bâ—ing living the word is iosheb sitting a participle of the present tense which hath also the signification of the future as Gen. 19.14 Lot spake to his sonnes in law which were marrying his daughters that is were to marrie them 3. The explanation of difficult questions QUEST I. When the Lord spake these words to Moses Vers. 1. NOw the Lord had said to Moses yet will I bring c. 1. Some referre this to the first vision which Moses saw in the bush but that cannot be for when the Lord thus spake to Moses nine plagues were past and there was but one to come 2. Neither did the Lord thus speake to Moses after he was come out from Pharaoh for after that he saw Pharaohs face no more chap. 10.29 and yet here vers 8. it is said he went from Pharaoh very angry 3. Therefore the message which Moses delivereth in this Chapter to Pharaoh concerning the destruction of the first borne was done at his last appearing before Pharaoh when he sent for him after the darknesse and immediatly before his going to Pharaoh the Lord thus said to Moses Iunius QUEST II. Why the overthrow of Pharaoh in the red sea was counted none of the plagues I Will bring one plague more c. 1. Thus the Lord doth all things in number weight and measure the Lord sendeth tenne plagues upon Egypt not fewer because he would shew his power nor more for these were sufficient Ferus 2. Beside this last plague of the first borne there followed the overthrow of Pharaoh and his host in the red sea but this is counted none of the plagues of Egypt because it was done after the Israelites were gone out of Egypt Simler As also these plagues were not a finall destruction of the Egyptians as the other was but probations and temptations Pellican Of the tenth plague QUEST III. Whether God used the ministry of good or bad Angels in the slaughter of the first borne Vers. 4. ABout midnight will I goe out into the middest of Egypt That God was the author of this plague in the slaughter of the first borne it is no question but the doubt is whether the Angels good or bad were the Lords ministers in it 1. In this life it is certaine that God sometime useth the good Angels to punish the wicked as in the destruction of Sodome and the evill Angels some time to chastise his owne children as Satan tempted and afflicted Iob. 2. In the next world who shall be the ministers of the torments in hell it is not so certaine Pererius thinketh that the evill Angels shall be the executioners of those torments because of that text goe into everlasting fire which is prepared for the devill and his Angels But the contrarie rather may bee inferred out of this text that because the Devill and his Angels also are ordained for torment it seemeth that he shall not be a tormenter of others who is to be tormented himselfe Therefore it is rather to be thought that seeing the chiefe use of the ministrie of Angels is for the benefit and comfort of the elect in this world till they be gathered together in the Kingdome of God Heb. 1.14 that in the next world there shall not be such imployment of the ministring spirits especially of the reprobate Angels And how the torments of hell shall be continued the Prophet Isay sheweth Tophet is prepared of old c. the burning thereof is fire and much wood the breath of the Lord like a river of brimstone doth kindle it chap. 30.33 The Lord of himselfe by his owne power in shewing the severitie of his justice shall hold the wicked in everlasting torment 3. But concerning this judgement in smiting the first borne some thinke that the evill Angels were used in this service Thostatus Lyran. Because it is said Psalm 78.49 Hee cast upon them the fiercenesse of his wrath by sending of evill Angels But this place is answered before quest 30. in chap. 7. that either
it may be understood of Moses and Aaron who were Gods messengers for so Angell signifieth or else they are called Angels of evill i. of poenal not morall evill rather than evill Angels And though they would seeme to gather by those words chap. 12.23 The Lord will not suffer the destroyer to come into your houses that this Angell of himselfe had a desire to invade the people of God and therefore was not a good Angell yet that followeth not but the words rather shew thus much that the Angell being sent forth by the Lord was to doe all things according to his direction to strike where God bid him strike and to forbeare where the Lord purposed to spare 4. Wherefore as the good Angels were the ministers of the former plagues as is shewed before quest 30. in chap. 7. so they are to be held to be the Lords instrument in this Pâ—rer QUEST IV. Whether one Angell or many were used in this destruction ANd for the number of these destroying Angels 1. Though it be said in the singular number chap. 12.23 the destroyer yet it followeth not that one Angell should be the minister for it is usuall in Scripture to put the singular for the plurall 2. Therefore it is more probable that many Angels were imployed in this service not in respect of the multitude that were slaine for in the host of Senacherib one Angell slew 180. thousand nor of the distance of place for one Angell in Davids time smote 70000. in three dayes space from Dan to Beersheba but in regard of the time because all the first borne of Egypt were slaine at midnight about the same time it is like that many Angels in divers places of Egypt were sent of God to strike the first borne Perer. Cajetan QUEST V. Vpon whom this plague in the smiting of the first borne was executed Vers. 5. ALl the first borne in the land of Egypt shall die All the first borne of every house as the chiefe and principall were smitten with death even from the Kings throne unto the sonne of the poore servant that ground at the mill which they used in the day to doe such servile works and in the night time kept them in hold and therefore it is said chap. 12.29 unto the first borne of the captive that was in prison So Samson did grind at the mill being in prison Iudg. 16. 2. Beside all the first borne of their beasts were slaine that is of their domesticall cattell for wilde beasts must be here excepted which were not in their power and such cattell as bring forth many at once where there is no difference betweene the firstlings and the rest Perer. 3. The third effect of this plague was that God did execute his judgements upon the gods and Idols of Egypt chap. 12.12 QUEST VI. Whether in every house the first borne were slaine BUt here this doubt ariseth concerning the first borne because it is said afterward chap. 12.30 that there was no house wherein there was not one dead whether in every house there were a first borne 1. Ab. Ezra thinketh all to be understood for the greater part 2. Simler for the houses of every sort both of high and low as the King and captive are named 3. Hugo S. Victor doth thus interpret it that in every house where was any first borne there was one slaine But it seemeth that no house at all was excepted because all the Israelites were commanded to strike the bloud upon the posts of their dores to escape the plague 4. Therefore Augustine thinketh that God so disposed at this time by his divine providence that every house of the Egyptians had one first borne quest 44. in Exod. But we need not run unto miracles where another exposition may be found 5. Thostatus thinketh that the first borne is here taken for the first borne of the feminine sex as well as of the males whether their parents were alive or dead whether they were the first borne by the husband or wife But the name of first borne is not thus taken in scripture neither yet is it like that any females died but males as it may appeare by the law of the first borne that are made holy unto God upon this occasion because the Lord for Israels sake killed all the first borne of Egypt there onely the males that first open the wombe are set apart chap. 13.12 6. Therefore of all the â—est I preferre the exposition of Iunius that in every house either the first or if there were no first borne the next principall man was taken in stead of the first borne so also Cajetane QUEST VII Why the Lord destroyeth the first borne NOw the first borne were slaine 1. Because they oppressed Israel whom the Lord calleth his first borne Exod. 4. Theodoret. 2. Rather because they put to death the first borne children of Israel yea all the males therefore the Lord doth worthily punish them in their first borne Ferus 3. And this plague was ordained for them more grievous than all the rest for what can come neerer a man than the death of his first borne which also may bee his onely borne as Abraham could not have a greater triall than when he was commanded to sacrifice his onely sonne Isaack that the Egyptians should be forced by this last and greatest plague to let Israel goe Perer. 4. Neither was this unjust in God to take away the life of infants who are not innocent before God and the Lord that gave them life may take it away if it more serve unto his glory And the parents also that had sinned were punished herein by the death of their dearest children being themselves reserved for a greater destruction Simler QUEST VIII Why the first borne of the cattell also are destroyed THe Egyptians cattell also are killed 1. because this losse also was a punishment unto the Egyptians for whose use they served Simler 2. And much of their substance also consisted in cattell Perer. so that both they lost part of their substance and wanted the use of them 3. Beside the Egyptians oppressed the Israelites and wronged them in their cattell Ferus 4. The Hebrewes also thinke this was one speciall cause for that the Egyptians did superstitiously adore divers kinds of cattell and therefore for detestation of their Idolatrie the cattell are punished QUEST IX How the Gods of the Egyptians were judged NOw what gods of Egypt were judged is diversly scanned 1. Some thinke that by gods the Magistrates and Judges are understood Osiander But this was said before that the first borne should be killed even from the Princes throne this was a punishment to Pharaoh and all his great men to have their first borne cut off 2. Some thinke that the Egyptian gods were judged in that their worshippers were punished Borrh. 3. Others that the Temples of the Idols were cast downe Hierom and their Idols throwne downe and beaten to dust as the Hebrewes 4. Some that
to have beene ten the first for want of water Exod. 17. the second likewise for water Numb 20. the third Exod. 14. when the Egyptians pursued them the fourth and fifth about Manna when they kept it till the morning and gathered it upon the Sabbath Exod. 16. The sixth murmuring was for flesh Exod. 16. and the seventh for flesh likewise Numb 11.4 The eighth for Moses absence when they made the golden Calfe the ninth when they tempted God in fighting against the Amalckites being forbidden Numb 14. The tenth upon the returne of the Spies which were sent to search the Land of Canaan Hieron dâ— 10. tentationib But if all the murmurings of the Israelites be summed together they will bee found more than ten not fewer than twenty And they were of three sorts either generall of the whole congregation or speciall of some few or particular of some principall persons 1. Their generall murmurings were upon these occasions first for things which they endured as the increasing of their bondage in Egypt at the first comming of Moses Exod. 5.21 their feare to be all destroyed of the Egyptians chap. 14.11 their wearinesse of the way Numb 11.1 their biting by Serpents Numb 21. Secondly for things which they wanted as for sweet and potable water Exod. 15.24 for bread chap. 16.3 for water in Rephidim Exod. 17. for flesh Numb 11. for water againe when Moses also offended Numb 20. Thirdly they murmured and disobeyed when any thing was imposed them which they liked not as twiâ—e they were disobedient about Manna in reserving it till the morning chap. 16.19 and in gathering it upon the Sabbath chap. 16.28 where although their murmuring be not expressed yet this their refractary disobedience could not bee without murmuring So they rebelled in fighting against the Amalekites and Canaanites being forbidden Numb 14.41 Fourthly they murmured when their expectation was deceived as upon Moses long absence Exod. 32.1 when they heard a false report of Canaan that the inhabitants thereof were invincible Numb 14. when Core Dathan and Abiram with their adherents were suddenly destroyed Numb 16.41 These murmurings in all were sixteene 2. The second kind of murmuring was of some speciall men as Core Dathan and Abirain with two hundred and 50. persons murmured against Moses and Aaron Numb 16.3 The third kind was of some principall persons as of Aaron and Miriam against Moses Numb 12. Of Moses himselfe at the waters of strife Numb 20. of Aaron being discontent and so negligent in his office because of the death of his two sonnes Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10.19 Here are foure more and unto these others by diligent observations may be added QUEST XXXIX Whether the wood had any vertue in it that Moses cast â—nto the water 25. ANd he cried unto the Lord and the Lord shewed him a tree 1. The Hebrewes thinke that this tree had no vertue at all in it to make the waters sweet but rather the contrary but that God would therein shew his power in healing one contrary by another as Elizeus did heale the waters by casting in of salt which was more like to have made them more bitter and our Saviour anointed the eyes of the blinde with clay and spittle which was an unlike thing to heale them 2. But it is more probable that there was some vertue in this wood to season and relish the water because it is said that the Lord shewed him or as the Hebrew word signifieth taught him the tree Tanquam tale jam liguâ—â—â—oc esseâ— quo posset hoc fieri As though it were such a kinde of wood as could doe this thing So Augustine reasoneth quaest 57. in Exod. to whom Calvinus and Simlerus consent for to what end else did the Lord direct Moses to that speciall tree more than to others unlesse we say that there were no trees there at all in the desert But the words will inferre another sense that seeing the Lord shewed him a tree there was a tree to be shewed as the Lord caused Hagar to see a fountaine not which newly sprung out of the ground but which was there before though she saw it not Gen. 21. The author of Ecclesiasticus chap. 38.5 affirmeth that there was vertue in the wood 3. But Iosephus is deceived who saith Moses fructum ligni accepit forte ibi jacens That Moses tooke a peece of wood lying there by chance whereas the Lord shewed it him and he further addeth that Moses did not cast in the wood because the people asked what it should doe but caused a great part of the water to bee drawne out of the fountaine and so the residue became sweet but this is also directly contrary to the text QUEST XL. Wherein the miracle consisted of healing the waters NOw although there were some vertue in this wood to heale the waters yet it was done not without a great mâ—racle 1. Which consisted not herein because the Lord Ostendit et lignum ubi nullum erat Shewed him a tree where none was for this is confuted before 2. Neither Quâ—a in tali natura ligni Creator demonstrator lâ—â—dandus est Because the Creator and shewer is to be praised in giving such a nature to the wood as Augustine in the same place for if the nature of the wood had done it it had not beene miraculous 3. But herein was the miracle that by the meanes of so small a peece of wood such a deale of water was changed as served such a great multitude Calvin And that it was suddenly and presently changed Simler And the waters were but made sweet only for that time and afterward returned to their bitter nature againe as Pliny before alleaged maketh mention of bitter waters there Iun. QUEST XLI Why the Lord used this meane in healing of the waters GOd could have healed the waters if it had pleased him without this tree But it pleased him to use this meanes for these causes 1. To teach us that we should not neglect the meanes which God appointed So the Lord divided the red sea and dried the way by a strong East winde Ezechias was healed by a lumpe of figges So God instructeth men and begetteth them to the faith by the ministery of men Simler 2. God hereby also reproveth their distrust and diffidence shewing Multa sibi in promptu esse remedia quibusque malis That he hath many remedies in store for whatsoever evils Calvin 3. Hoc medio uti voluit propter mysterium He would use this meane because of the mystery Ferus QUEST XLII Of the mysticall signification of this tree NOw what mystery is signified in this tree that sweetned the waters shall bee shewed in a word 1. Some by the bitter waters doe understand the killing letter of the Law which is impotable and unpleasant but being qualified by the Gospell Iam dulcâ—â— erit litera The letter of the Law becommeth pleasant Ferus 2. This tree was a figure of that rod which should come of the
much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta sunt for so also the flesh
doe as I counsell thee poteris aâ—dire pracepta Dei thou shalt have time to heare what God commandeth thee that is to consult with God which his leisure would not now permit him to doe Oleast Osiand 3. But this clause seemeth to depend of the first word â—m if so that the meaning rather is this if God doe approve this my councell Iun. Wherein appeareth the piety of Iethro that would not obtrude his councell upon Moses no otherwise than it should have the divine approbation Simler Calvin QUEST XXIV In what sense the people are said to goe quietly to their place ANd all this people shalâ— goe quietly to their place 1. Some take this to be the meaning that this order devised by Iethro was but to serve during the time of their travell but when they were come to their place that is to the land of Canaan then they should have Officers and Judges set in their Cities Ex Siml But Iethro in these words sheweth the present benefit which should redound unto them by this order both Moses should be eased of much labour and the people of their attendance 2. In these words therefore Iethro doth insinuate two things both that the people should dispatch their businesse whereas they were constrained before to goe home their controversies undecided because Moses was not at leasure to heare all and so they should goe home quietly Simler And againe they should not need to hang so long and give such attendance as they did Iun. For Moses should bee able to dispatch their greater causes which they brought unto him in time and their smaller controversies should be taken up at home Tostat. quast 8. QUEST XXV Whether these Officers were chosen by Moses Vers. 25. ANd Moses chose men 1. These Officers and Magistrates were taken out from the rest of the people by election so that the government of Israel was in respect of Moses Monarchicall for the supreme authority still remained in him but in respect of these inferiour Magistrates it was Aristocraticall which forme of government is so called because the best and most worthy are elected to rule and governe 2. Moses is said to have chosen them because he coÌ„nfirmed the peoples choice and admitted those whom they presented for so hee said unto the people Bring you men of wisdome c. and I will make them Rulers over you Deut. 1.13 For it was the safest way for the people to make choice of them because they were better knowne unto them and they would the more willingly obey them Tostat quaest 9. 3. Further whereas Moses saith Deut. 1.8 I am not able to beare you my selfe alone as though Moses himselfe first thought of this device it must be understood that after Iethro had given this councell unto Moses then he propounded it unto the people Genevens QUEST XXVI Whether these Officers were of equall authority or one subordinate to another Vers. 25. ANd make them heads over the people 1. It is not like that these Officers whereof some were set over thousands some over hundreds some over fifties some over tennes that they had their severall distinct regiments so that they which were not under one Officer as under the Ruler over ten were not also under his superiour Officer that was set over fifty for then if they had beene all of equall authority this distinction needed not to have beene that some were Rulers of thousands some of hundreds c. But it had beene better for them all to have beene of one sort as all over hundreds or tens and againe if these Officers had not beene subordinate one under another that inconvenience should not have beene prevented which Iethro intended to deliver Moses of trouble for by these meanes if the people might not appeale from one Judge to a superiour a multitude of causes still should have beene devolved to Moses 2. Therefore it is resolved that these Officers were one under another the Ruler of ten under the Ruler of fifty and he under the Centurion and this also under the tribune or millenary Officer so that there was none of the people which was not subject to a Ruler of ten or tithing man to a Ruler of fifty a Ruler of an hundred and a Ruler over a thousand And this subordination served to two purposes both for the Officers themselves that if any controversie fell out among them it might bee ordered by the superiour Judge and if the people found themselves agreeved with their tithing men and inferiour Officers they might appeale for redresse to their superiour Judges And so the appeale ascended from the Ruler of ten to the Ruler of fifty from the Ruler of fifty to the Centurion and from him to the millenary Judge or Tribune and thus their causes were decided before they came at Moses only the hardest and most difficult matters were reserved for his hearing and from him there was no further appeale Tostat. quaest 11. QUEST XXVII Of the difference betweene these Officers and the 70. Elders Num. 10. FUrther it is here to be considered that this institution of Officers which was brought in by the councell and advice of Iethro was divers from that order of 70. Elders which was instituted afterward by the Lord Numb 10. For they differ both in order of time these were appointed before they came to Sinai the other after they removed thence and in number these were many no doubt divers thousands the other onely 70. Iethro gave the advice for the choice of the first but the Lord himselfe of the other Their office also and administration was divers the seventy were the Councell of State which consulted only of the publike affaires of the Kingdome the other attended upon the private causes and suits of the people This difference betweene the Senators and Counsellers of State and inferiour Judges was observed in all well ordered Common-wealths among the Athenians Lacedemonians Romans and is to be seene in our State This was the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Senate of the Jewes which at the first consisted indifferently of men taken out of all the tribes six out of each of the eleven tribes the Levites excepted and the other foure to make up 70. were supplied by Levites and Priests to direct the rest This indifferent choice out of all the tribes continued untill the time of the Kings when the choice of these Elders was overruled by their authority then after the captivity because of the prerogative of the tribe of Iudah to whom the principality of right appertained most of the Elders were taken out of that tribe and so it continued till Herod dissolved that honourable and grave Senate of the Elders making havocke of them and putting most of them to death Iun. ex Ioseph Analys in Num. cap. 11. QUEST XXVIII At what time Iethro tooke his leave of Moses Vers. 27. AFterward Moses let his father in law depart c. 1. Some thinke that Iethro neither came unto Moses in
the law of Christ but that much was permitted and tolerated unto the Jewes onely for the hardnesse of their heart as our blessed Saviour sheweth Matth. 19. 2. Some doe urge the lawes of men and the greater punishments which have beene laid upon women for adulterie rather than upon men and that therefore the sinne of the woman should bee the greater But this sheweth not the greatnesse of the sinne before God but the greater inconvenience that is brought upon the civill and politike state which the lawes of men seeke chiefly to preserve by the adulterie of the woman rather than of the man 3. Some thinke that it is a greater sinne in the man because of his authoritie quia vir caput mulieris because the man is head of the woman and the Apostle biddeth that women if they would learne any thing should aske their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 Est ergo vir doctor mulieris The man then is the womans teacher then as the Priest sinneth more than a lay man because he is his teacher so the man doth more grievously offend than the woman Thomas in opuscul But this proveth not that the sinne of the man simply is greater than the sinne of the woman but in a certaine respect 4. Wherefore the best answer is that the sinne of adulterie in some respects is equall in both sexes and in some other greater both in the one and the other 1. In regard of the law of Matrimonie whereby they have given their faith each to the other the sinne seemeth to be equall for the man hath no more power over himselfe in this behalfe than the woman as S. Paul teacheth 1 Cor. 7.4 and therefore by Moses law as well the adulterer as the adulteresse was to be put to death 2. But in respect of the qualitie and condition of the person because the woman is the weaker vessell and the man is the head of the woman and of the more strength this sinne is greater in the man because hee therein give than evill example to the weaker partie and teacheth her an evill lesson Ecclesiasticus 9.1 3. But the inconveniences considered that follow hereupon as the ignominie and shame of houses the confusion of inheritances and the obtruding of false heires by the adulterie and false play of women their sinne is thought to exceâ—d Simler Which might be the reason also why among the Jewes the men were permitted to have divers wives but not the women to have divers husbands QUEST IX Whether adulterie be now necessarily to be punished by death SOmewhat here would bee inserted concerning the punishment of adulterie by the sentence of death wherein there are these three opinions 1. Some thinke that adulterie ought to be punished capitally according to the judiciall law of Moses and not otherwise Piscaetor giveth divers reasons hereof but two especially I will single out 1. Delicta temporibus naturam suam non mutant Sinnes doe not change their nature in time 2. Deus naturam suam non mutat Neither doth God change his nature so that he hateth sinne no lesse now than in times past neither will he have it lesse punished Praefat. in Exod. Contra. 1. The nature of sinne is the same though the punishment bee altered adulterie is as grievous before God now as it was under the law but the circumstances as of place and person so also of time may give occasion of aggravating or alleviating the punishment Hee that gathered sticks upon the Sabbath was stoned to death Numb 30. because it was necessarie that the law at the beginning being then newly given should bee established by severitie But yet our Saviour excuseth his Apostles for gathering and rubbing eares of corne upon the Sabbath Matth. 12. Saint Peter pronounced the sentence of death upon Aâ—amas and Sapphira for deteining part of that which they had given to the Church for the terror and example of others yet now such dissimulation is not held to be worthie of death 2. Neither is God changed by the changing or mitigating the rigour of the law but he removing the same applieth his law according to the different respect of 〈◊〉 and persons for as well hee might bee said to be changed in the changing of other 〈◊〉 as of the ceremoniall and judicials thereto annexed 4. If all judicials annexed to the Morall law are now to be necessarily retained then the violating of the rest of the Lords day as then of the Sabbath which was in that respect morall should be punished with death and blaspheming and prophaning of the name of God by swearing as Levit. 24.16 which would seeme to be too rigorous 5. And seeing the times of the Gospell are the times of mercie and those under the Law were the times of rigour and severitie to abate somewhat of the rigorous punishments of the Law not leaving sinne unpunished may seeme not unlawfull 2. Another opinion is that adulterie is not at all now to be punished by death for our Saviour would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie Ioh. 8. Contra. 1. Upon that example of Christ it cannot be gathered that it is unlawfull to censure adultery by death for it would follow as well that adultery is not to be punished at all because Christ inflicteth no punishment at all upon her onely this may be inferred that by Christs silence and forbearance it appeareth that the punishment of adultery by death is not necessary for if his will had beene that the rigour of that law should stand in force our Saviour needed not to have feared their trap lest they should have condemned him of rigour and severitie if he had judged her worthie of death and if he had repealed that law they would have accused him as contrarie to Moses 3. This then may bee collected by Christs silence and connivence that it is not necessarie that adulterie should alwayes and in all places be sentenced unto death but rather that it is left indifferent that neither those Churches are to be condemned of too great severitie which follow the president of Moses judicials herein nor yet they are to be accused of too much lenitie which judge adulterie otherwise than by death as they see it best to fit their estate so that the severitie of the punishment be answerable to the quality of the sinne By Moses law they which committed adulterie were to die the death that is if it were duplex adulterium that both the adulterer and adulteresse were married or if the woman were anothers wife Levit. 20.10 otherwise it was not death for a married man beside his wife to have a Concubine or to one wife to take another so shee were not anothers wife What will they thinke now of such single adulterie that would have it revenged by death they have no president in Moses law for the punishing of this kinde of adulterie by death then it is evident that all adulterie by the law of Moses was not adjudged to
of the change of their minde but they are not to bee forced by any such promise of mariage to accomplish the same 2. The other kinde of espousals is de praesenti pronounced of the time present as if one say Ego te mihi despondeo uxorem I take thee to my wife this contract is actuall and effectuall and cannot bee dissolved being lawfully made for that which God hath coupled together man cannot put asunder Matth. 19.7 and they which are thus contracted are man and wife before God as Iacob calleth Rachel being onely espoused his wife Give me my wife Genes 29.21 and the Angell calleth Mary espoused to Ioseph his wife Matth. 1.20 Hereof it was that by Moses law hee which defloured a maid espoused unto another was to bee stoned to death Deut. 22.23 3. After these espousals there came betweene them and the celebration of the mariage some convenient space of time 1. For publike honestie sake that they should not presently come together as bruit beasts in the heat of their fleshly desire 2. That by this meanes their mindes might bee first knit together before their bodies their desire of each to other by this meanes being kindled and increased 2. That this pause being made if in the meane time there should fall out any just cause of let it might appeare Bucanus QUEST XV. Of mariage consummate and the rites and orders therein to be observed MAriage is consummate by two solemne and publike actions one is religious and Ecclesiasticall the other is Civill 1. The parties espoused are first brought into the face of the congregation both to testifie their unfained consent each to other and that they may publikely bee instructed by the Minister of the duties of mariage and be commended unto God by the prayers of the congregation which godly use of the publike celebration of mariage before the congregation howsoever some schismatickes foolishly and wilfully spurne against it yet is grounded partly upon the example of God himselfe who brought man and woman together and gave them a solemne blessing saying Increase and multiplie partly upon that rule of the Apostle 1. Corinth 14.40 that all things in the Church should be done honestly and by order for by this meanes secret and 〈◊〉 mariages are prevented and the parties freed from all suspition who without this publike solemnitie might bee thought so live incontinently together and seeing all things are consecrate by the word of God and prayer 1. Tim 4.5 it is requisite that such a weightie businesse as this should bee sanctified with prayer and invocation of the name of God 2. The other publike action is Civill in the nuptiall feast or festivitie for it hath beene a commendable custome in all ages and in all nations almost to solemnize mariage with the cheerefull meeting of friendâ—â— as Laban made a feast in the mariage of his daughters Genes 29.22 our blessed Saviour was present at a mariage feast at Cana in Galile Ioh. 2. But the mariage feast ought to bee kept with this cavent that there bee no excesse riot or disorder with other abuses that often fall out in such meetings As in that great feast which the great King of Persia made unto his Nobles such good order was kept that none was compelled to drinke more than hee would himselfe Esther 1.8 This moderate and sober kinde of feasting may safely bee retained among Christians according to S. Pauls rule Philip. 4.8 9. Whatsoever things are true whatsoever things are honest whatsoever things are just c. those things doe and the God of peace shall bee with you Ex Bucano QUEST XVI What conditions are required in lawfull mariage BUt in lawfull mariage divers conditions are required and namely these 1. That Matrimony bee contracted between such parties as are apt for mariage The contracts then and espousals made betweene children are void 2. That there bee a voluntarie consent of both parties not forced or urged thereunto 3. The consent also of the parents or of those which are in the place and stead of parents must not bee wanting 4. There must bee no error in the persons as when they are espoused as virgins which prove afterward to bee otherwise or such like errors and mistakings 5. That honest conditionâ— bee propounded in such contracts with decencie and comelines 6. That Matrimonie bee contracted onely betweene two parties for though the Fathers were permitted to have many wives yet we must live not according to examples but by a certaine law and rule 7. Mariage must bee contracted in the Lord that is onely betweene the faithfull and beleevers and such as consent together in the true faith and religion 8. That such persons contract not together as are within the degrees prohibited either of affinitie and consanguinitie which are expressed Levit. 18. which prohibition of degrees is grounded upon the law of nature and therefore is morall and perpetuall for God did cast out the Canaanites because they were defiled herein Levit. 18.24 Who were not bound to the ceremoniall but to the morall lawes and the end of this prohibition of certaine degrees was for reverence of the neerenesse of kindred and blood as this reason is rendred None shall come neere to any of the kindred of his flesh to uncover their shame Levit. 18.6 and therefore this law is universall and perpetuall Vrsin Concerning the particular limitation of these degrees and right computation of them see elsewhere this matter handled at large Synops contr 15. of Matrimonie qu. 3. QUEST XVII Of the ends of the institution of matrimonie NOw the ends wherefore Matrimonie was ordained are these 1. In respect of the parties themselves there are three ends 1. That they should be a mutuall helpe one unto another both in divine and humane duties as the Lord when hee made woman said I will make an helpe meet for him Gen. 2.18 which helpe is partly in humane affaires as in domesticall duties in governing and ordering the familie in the bringing up and education of children and in personall duties one in helping and releeving another in sicknesse and in health as also in divine one in comforting another in praying one for another and such like 2. Mariage is ordained to bee a remedie against incontinencie and vagrant lust 1. Cor. 7.2 3. For procreation of children which should continue their parents name and succeed in his inheritance as the Lord said unto them Gen. 1.28 Increase and multiplie 2. In respect of the Church and Common-wealth Matrimonie was appointed as a meane to increase them both with profitable members and instruments and therefore parents are charged to bring up their children in the instruction and information of the Lord Ephes. 6.4 that they may bee fit to bee employed in the Church and Common-wealth 3. In respect of God Matrimonie was instituted principally for the setting forth of his glorie that the married parties should together better learne to serve and worship God and to bring up
Arke and Tabernacle were apart so that it seemeth in that confused and unsetled estate that the Law in that behalfe concerning the place of sacrifice was not so strictly observed QUEST XXII Whether it was lawfull to sacrifice before the Arke and at the Tabernacle while they were asunder NOw the place where the Lord did put the memoriall of his name was in the Tabernacle and Arke while they were placed together and when they were in two divers places it was lawfull to sacrifice before either of them 1. That it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Arke was is evident by the practise of the men of Bethshemesh that offered sacrifice at the returne of the Arke from the land of the Philistims 1 Sam. 6. So David sacrificed before the Arke when he brought it from the house of Ebed Edom 2 Sam. 6. and the reason is because the name of God was invocated or called upon where the Arke was 2 Sam. 6.2 And from the mercie seat which was upon the Arke of the Testimony did the Lord use to speake and give answers Numb 7.89 2. Likewise that it was lawfull to sacrifice where the Tabernacle was while the Arke was away is apparent 1. Because there was the brasen Altar whereon they offered their burnt offerings before the dore of the Tabernacle Levit. 17.6 which Altar followed alwayes the Tabernacle and not the Arke as Salomon found the Arke at Jerusalem but the Tabernacle with the furniture thereof he fetched from Gibeon 2 Chron. 1.3 4 5. 2. Where the Ministers of the Altar the Priests and Levits were there was it lawfull to offer sacrifice for they gave their attendance to that end but most of the Priests and Levits remained with the Tabernacle as Ahimelech with 85. more were at Nob where Saul put them to death while the Arke abode in the house of Abinadab who consecrated his sonne Eleazar to keepe it 1 Sam. 7.1 who alone sufficed not for all sacrifices and oblations of Israel it seemeth therefore that most of their sacrifices were brought then to the Tabernacle though the Arke at that time were in another place 3. Beside after the captivity of Babylon when the Arke was no more to be seene as some thinke hid by Ieremy 2 Macchab. 2 but as is most like lost in the captivity or burnt with the Temple they used to offer sacrifices for after the captivity they restored and renewed such necessary parts and implements as before were in Salomons Temple and were burnt together with the Temple they made like unto them afterward as mention is made of Luk. 1. how Zacharie burned incense before the Lord which was upon the golden Altar likewise Matth. 27. the vaile was rent which divided the most holy place from the Sanctuary when Christ gave up the ghost and seeing they offered sacrifices for which cause some sold doves in the Temple whom Christ cast out Matth. 12. they had also the brasen Altar only the Arke they had not for seeing the Tables of stone the pot of Manna and Aarons rod were all missing for the keeping whereof the Arke was principally made they had no cause to make a new Arke there being no farther use or service for it Tostat. quaest 43. QUEST XXIII How long the Arke was severed from the Tabernacle NOw because mention is made before of the parting and separation of the Arke and Tabernacle it shall not be amisse to shew how long the Arke was absent from the Tabernacle which time will be found to be not much under 100. yeeres as may bee gathered thus after the Arke returned from the country of the Philistims it remained in the house of Abinadab 20. yeeres 1 Sam. 6. and all the time of Samuels government and Sauls reigne who made 40. yeeres betweene them Act. 13.21 whereof those 20. yeeres were part then it was removed by David about the 8. yeere of his reigne to the house of Obed Edom where it continued three moneths and from thence to the house of David in Jerusalem where it stayed 32. yeeres and 11. yeeres more under Salomons reigne for when hee had finished the Temple in the 11. yeere of his reigne 1 King 6.38 he brought the Arke from Davids tent which hee had pitched for it into the Temple 2 Chron. 1.4 So all these yeeres being put together 40. yeeres of Samuel and Sauls government 40. yeeres under David and 11. yeeres of the reigne of Salomon will make 91. yeeres whereunto adde those seven moneths during which time the Arke so journed among the Philistims 1 Sam. 6.1 In which compasse and continuance of yeeres the Arke had these sundry removes first it being carried from Shiloh was seven moneths in the countrey of the Philistims from thence it was carried to Bethshemesh where 50. thousand and 70. persons were slaine for looking into the Arke 1 Sam. 6. then it removed to Kiriathiearim 1 Sam. 7. from thence to the house of Obed Edom and so to the house of David 2 Sam. 6. where it stayed till Salomons Temple was built these were the setling places and mansions of the Arke after it was severed from the Tabernacle till they were joyned together againe saving that sometime the Arke upon some speciall occasion was removed for a while as when they went out to battell as 1 Sam. 14.18 and so was brought to the place againe Sic fere Tostat. qu. 42. QUEST XXIV Of the removing of the Tabernacle AS the Arke was thus removed up and downe so also was Moses Tabernacle for first it was carried from place to place as long as the Israelites pitched their tents in the wildernesse and after they were come into the land of Canaan the Tabernacle remained a long time in Gilgal for thither came the Gibeonites to Ioshuah in Gilgal Iosh. 10. after that it was set up in Shiloh Iosh. 18.1 where it continued all the time of the Judges untill Samuel who understanding by the Spirit of prophecie that the Lord had rejected Shiloh removed the Tabernacle to Nob where Saul put 85. Priests to the sword from thence it seemeth the Tabernacle was translated to Gibeon where it continued untill Salomons Temple was finished from thence Salomon brought it into the Temple 2. Chron. 1.3 Tostatus qu. 42. QUEST XXV Of the places where it was lawfull or unlawfull to sacrifice NOw concerning the places wherein it was lawfull to sacrifice this distinction is to bee observed 1. That the ordinary place was in the Tabernacle when the Arke and it were together and both at the Tabernacle and before the Arke when they were divided as is before shewed 2. Extraordinarily it was lawfull for the Prophets to sacrifice elsewhere as did Samuel David Elias as is before declared quest 20. being thereunto directed by the Spirit of God 3. But in the high places it was unlawfull to sacrifice and therefore those Kings are commended which tooke away the high places and those reproved being otherwise good Kings that suffred them to remaine 4.
how the Lord is affected to the seventh day of rest that in remembrance thereof he also privileged the seventh yeare for the freedome of servants and the fiftieth yeare of Jubile Oleaster Whereby we are taught religiously to consecrate unto Gods honour the seventh day 2. Doct. Of Gods providence even in such things as seeme to fall out by chance Vers. 13. BVt God hath offred him into his hand Discamus non casuâ— aut fortunae istos occursus attribuere sed providentiae supremi Iudicis c. Let us learne saith Cajetane hereupon to attribute such occurrents not unto chance or fortune but unto the providence of the highest Judge Even these accidents which seeme to fall out by chance are ruled and governed by the providence of God as our blessed Saviour saith that even our haires are numbred and therefore nothing can happen unto us otherwise than as God disposeth 3. Doct. The fact is to be measured by the minde of the doer Vers. 13. IF a man have not laid wait Vides externa facta non esse judicanda juxta externam facti speciem c. You see that outward facts are not to bee judged according to the externall shew sed juxta internum facientis animum but according to the inward minde and purpose of the doer Lippom. As God saith to Abimelech when he had taken Sara Abrahams wife I know that thou didst this even with an upright minde Genes 21.6 4. Doct. In all wrongs there must be satisfaction and restitution made Vers. 19. HE shall beare his charges The injurie must be freely forgiven but yet there must be recompence and satisfaction made for the losse and hindrance so likewise vers 34. The owner shall make it good The law sheweth that restitution must be made for the hurt and damage made unto another Oleaster Therefore a man cannot looke for remission of his trespasse from God which he hath committed against his neighbour where he refuseth to make him amends it being in his power so did just Zachtus restore fourefold whatsoever he had wrongfully gotten Luk. 19.8 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Of the Anabaptists that denie the use of the sword unto the Civill Magistrate Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar that he may die This place doth authorise and warrant the lawfull power of the Civill Magistrate in the use of the sword against the error of the Anabaptists which would altogether deprive the Magistrate of it urging that place in the Gospell Matth. 5.39 I say unto you resist not evill But here our blessed Saviour repealeth not the law of Moses An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth but onely reverseth the corrupt exposition of the Pharisies which by this text would give warrant unto privat men to seeke their owne revenge whereas the law giveth this power onely unto the Civill Magistrate So the Apostle also saith that the Magistrate heareth not the sword for nought for he is the minister of God to take vengeance on him that doth evill Rom. 13.4 2. Confut. Against the Papists that would exempt Ecclesiasticall persons from the Civill power Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar Even the Priest ministring at the Altar if he had committed wilfull murther might be taken from thence and put to death by the Magistrate as R. Salomon noteth wherein appeareth the soveraigne right and power which then the Civill Magistrate had over the Priests of the law which Tostatus granteth but he saith that herein there was great difference betweene the Priests of those times and of ours and thereupon he putteth this note in the margen Nota differentiam inter Sacerdotes veteris Testamenti nova legis note a difference betweene the Priests of the old Testament and of the new law Tostat. quaest 16. Contra. 1. But herein is no difference at all for the Ministers of the Gospell are no more exempted now from the Civill power than the Priests were then for the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher power Rom. 13.1 In this generall speech none are excepted yea our blessed Saviour who might have pleaded a greater privilege in this behalfe then any refused not to pay tribute for avoiding of offence Matth. 17.27 See more of this question Synops. Centur. 1. err 98. 3. Confut. Against the great abuse of Popish Sanctuaries FRom mine Altar This sheweth that the Temple and Altar as also the Cities of refuge were privileged places for some kinde of offenders though not for wilfull murtherers Here then somewhat would be inserted concerning the great abuse of Sanctuaries and privileged places in times past 1. Concerning the beginning and first occasion of them it is grounded upon and derived from the judiciall constitutions of Moses who by Gods appointment assigned certaine Cities of refuge for some offenders to flee unto but not for all malefactors from Moses the Gentiles seemed to borrow the like custome in giving immunitie and privilege to some places As in Athens Hercules nephewes builded the Temple of Mercie and obtained for the same this privilege that they which fled thither for succour should not by violence be taken thence In Rome Remus and Romulus betweene the tower and the Capitol appointed a place of refuge called intermontius betweene the hilles after that the Temples and Altars and then the images of the Emperours were privileged to give protection to those which fled thither for succour And from this example came the like immunities which were given afterward to the Churches of Christians which was afterward enlarged unto Church-yards and Monasteries As this reason is alleaged in the Imperiall constitutions of Theodos. and Valentin that because the Gentiles gave such honour to their Idoll temples c. Quantum oportet praesidii ad sacratissimas aras confugientibus praestare How much reliefe ought we to yeeld to those which flie to the most holy Altars The same reason is yeelded Concil Matiscin 2. can 8. Simundani Principes suis legibus censuerunt c. If worldly Princes have decreed by their lawes that whosoever did flee unto their images should be without hurt how much should he remaine undemnified qui suae gremium matris Ecclesia petierit c. which goeth to the bosome of his mother the Church 2. Now for the convenient and necessarie use of such Sanctuaries and privileged places these reasons are brought 1. That they which were innocent as in the case of involuntarie killing might rescue themselves from the rage of the pursuers 2. They which were oppressed by unequall Judges might finde shelter here till either the Judges wrath were appeased or a more indifferent Judge found 3. Such places served for the reliefe of servants that were cruelly handled of their masters 4. And for such as were endebted and were pursued of their cruell creditours and exactours 5. And in time of warre such places were of speciall use that they which fled thither might be preserved from the sword As
and 〈◊〉 2. And beside the facility easinesse and readinesse of theft other things are to be respected as the worth and price of the thing stollen and the boldnesse and impudency of the theefe 6. Wherefore these reasons rather may be yeelded 1. Quia frequâ—ntius furtâ— subtraâ—ebantur 〈◊〉 It might be that it was a more frequent and usuall thing to steale oxen among the Hebrewes than sheepes and therefore God would restraine the more usuall theft by the greater punishment Tostat. 2. In hâ—c dominium majus â—adacia major In this theft of oxen the losse was greater to the owner when his exe was stollen and the boldnesse of the theefe greater 〈…〉 esse Such a theefe as should steale oxen had need be bold and cunning because such a theft cannot so easily be hid as of sheepe 3. Ab. Ezra also giveth this reason because when a sheepe is stollen the owner loseth but his sheepe but in the other theft 〈…〉 he loseth his oxe and the labour of his oxe this reason also is approved by Oleaster 〈◊〉 Gallasâ—â—â— But Tostatus taketh this exception that iâ— the losse of the oxeus labour â—e accounted here in the restitution of five-fold why should it not be respected as well when the thing stollen is found with the theefe in which â—ase he was to pay but two-fold qu. 2. The answer here is ready because where the oxe is found though thâ—â—e â—e an intermission of his labour yet there is hope of restitution againe so is there not here the oxe being killed or sold. 7. Iosephus thinketh that this Law extendeth it selfe also to other cattell in the fields as to goats as well as sheepe though they be not here 〈◊〉 But concerning the asse or horse because they are not so easily stollen being kept in the house Tostatus thinketh that the Law of two-fold restitution tooke place as in the stealing of houshold stuffe and other moveable goods But it is more like recording to the rule observed before in other Lawes that by one kinde the rest are understood and these two the oxe and sheepe are given â—n â—ssistance as the most usuall and common beasts unto which all other great and small cattell should be reduced as afterward vers 4. direct mention is made of the asse QUEST III. Of the divers punishment of theft and whether it may be capitall NOw concerning the punishment of theft 1. The licentious liberty of the Lacedemonians is much to be misliked who punished not theft at all because they thought it was a meanes to traine and exercise their people in the practice of warre Gallas for it being a Morall law Thou shalt not steale and so grounded upon the Law of nature it ought not by any contrary custome to be discontinued 2. Neither is that Law of Solâ—â— which the Romans also inserted into their twelve Tables to be altogether approved aâ—â—â—ing opposite to Moses Law for they punished manifest theft with foure-fold when the theefe was taken in the manner whereas Moses setteth it but at two-fold and theft not manifest when the theefe is not found with the thing that was stollen they censured with restitution of two-fold whereas Moses chargeth such offence with foure-fold because such an one as hath sold or killed the stollen good hath added sinne to sinne having no purpose of restitution nor there being any possibility thereof Herein therefore the Law of Moses is more equall than the other 3. The Law also of Draco is too severe which punished theft with death the Scythians did so also but they had some reason for it because they had no houses or places of defence for their cattell so that if theft among them had not beene most severely punished nothing could have beene safe 4. Nor yet am I of their opinion that thinke that lex Mosis non pertinet ad politiam nostram the Law of Moses doth not at all belong to the policie of Common-wealths now Lippom. Non sumus alligati ad leges Iudaicas forenses That we are not bound how to the Jewes Civill lawes at all Osiand but that Magistrates may increase the externall punishment whether by death or otherwise as the circumstance of time quality and condition of the people require Contra. 1. As we are not strictly tied in every point to Moses Judicials so yet the equity thereof remaineth still which chiefly consisteth in this in the due measuring and weighing of the nature of sinnes which are thought to be worthy of death 2. Punishments externall may be increased which concerned either pecuniary mulcts or other bodily chastisement not touching the life as Moses punished theft with foure-fold but afterward the sinne increasing it was set at seven-fold Prov. 7.31 Pelarg. 3. But whereas mans life is only at Gods disposition this may be safely affirmed that no humane Law can take away the life of man for any offence without either generall or particular warrant and direction from Gods Law as is more at large before declared p. 4 5. 5. And yet I cannot consent to those that thinke no theft at all ought to be punished by death for even by Moses Law a violent theft as in breaking up of an house was judged worthy of death it was lawfull to kill such a theefe vers 2. Againe sacrilegious theft was likewise punished in the same manner as Iakob giveth sentence that they should not live that had stollen Labans gods Gen. 31.32 So Achan was put to death for stealing the excommunicate thing Iosh. 7. Theft committed of wantonnesse and without mercie David adjudgeth unto death 2 Sam. 12. vers 6. Chrysostome thinketh that David legem est praetergressus exceeded the Law in that he commandeth beside the restitution of foure-fold the man to be slaine and he calleth it supereffluentem justitiam overabounding justice But the Law of God did beare out David in it for he which did sinne presumptuously and with an high hand that is of malice and obstinacie was to dye for it Numb 15.30 Such was the sinne of the rich man whose case there is propounded which having many sheepe himselfe tooke away the poore mans sheepe by violence and had no pity Further he that did steale a man was to dye for it by the Law of Moses vers 16. So that it is evident even by Moses Judiciall lawes that some kinde of theft deserved death By the Romane Lawes also as is extant in their 12. Tables servants convicted of manifest theft were first beaten and then cast downe headlong from the rocke By the Imperiall lawes a theefe for the first offence was whipped then if he offended againe he lost his eares and the third time he was hanged in Anithent ut nulli Iudici c. for now such a theefe sinneth of obstinacie and malice and contempt against the Lawes and Magistrate and may by the Law of God be worthily put to death Simler So likewise such thefts whereby the publike peace and safety is violated as in the Campe
with these abominations for the which the Lord cast them out Levit. 18.24 Simler QUEST XXXV What is meant by sacrificing to other gods 〈…〉 hearing that the two tribes and an halfe beyond Jordan had erected them an Altar they assembled themselves together against them as jealous lest they purposed to bring in a new worship of God Tostat. 5. And not onely they which committed Idolatrie themselves but they which perswaded others were to be put to death Deut. 13.6 7. QUEST XXXVI Whether Idolatrie now is to be punished by death Vers. 20. SHall be slaine 1. The word is charam that simply signifieth not to cut off but to destroy as an anathema thing accursed and bequeathed to destruction Iun. Pelarg. 2. The Interlinearie Glosse expoundeth it of excommunication and of eternall death but both the practise of those times and the like punishment here â—nflicted upon other capitall crimes sheweth that it must be understood of the losse of the temporall life though beside without their great repentance Idolaters deserve also everlasting death Rev. 22.8 3. Some object that now Idolatrie is not to be punished by death but that such rather that are seduced should be instructed in the true worship of God and in the times of the Gospell it is fit more clemencie and mercie should be shewed than under the rigour of the law Answ. 1. Though Idolaters are to be instructed to reforme their error for the salvation of their soules yet this letteth not but that for so great impietie and for the example of others they should worthily suffer the paines of death 2. And now under the Gospel seeing robberie against the common peace and â—reason against the life and safetie of the Prince and State are judged worthy of death Qui majestatem Dei 〈◊〉 dissime violavit tam leve facinus admisisse putabitur shall he which violateth the Majestie of God most impiously be thought to commit so small an offence Gallas 4. But although as Osiander saith the Magistrate non gladio in idololatriam vindicare teneatur be not now bound to take revenge of Idolatrie by the sword for some difference there is betweene Pagane idolatrie and Popish superstitious Imagerie the one being an absolute deniall of all Christianitie the other a mixing therewith of superstitious vanitie yet by the equitie of this Judiciall law which serveth for the strengthening of a morall precept the like sin of idolatrie may justly receive the like punishment As Cyprian repeating that law Deut. 13.12 Si audieris in una ex civitatibus c. If thou hearest of any of the cities c. that are drawne away to serve other gods that such a city should be destroyed thus further inferreth cujus praecepti memor Mattathias which precept Mattathias remembring killed him that approached to the idolatrous Altar to sacrifice c. Then he further addeth Quod si ante adventum Christi circa Deum colendum et idola spernendâ— haec pracepta servata sunt c. Now if these precepts concerning the worship of God and despising of Idols were kept before the comming of Christ quanto magis post adventum Christi servanda sunt How much more ought they to be kept after the comming of Christ seeing he hath not onely exhorted us in words but in deeds Augustine likewise shewing a difference betweene the schisme of the Donatists and Pagane idolatrie thus concludeth Quis vestrum non laudat leges c. Which of you doth not commend the lawes given by the Emperours against the sacrifices of the Pagans illius quippe impietatis capitale supplicium est c. for the punishment of that impietie is capitall 5. R. Salomon thinketh that if a Jew did sweep an Idol Temple velornaret vel alia similia faceret quae sunt praambula c. or adorne it onely and doe other things which are but preambles to Idolatrie he was not to be punished by death but some other wayes Ex Lyrano But if enticing in words to idolatrie were judged worthy of death Deut. 17.5 much more to entice and draw by fact and example as in adorning and beautifying the Temples of Idols QUEST XXXVII Why idolatrie is judged worthy of death NOw the reasons why idolatry was held by Moses law to be worthy of death were these 1. Quia is cultus diabolo exhibetur qui idolorum author est Because that idolatrous worship is giuen unto the devill who is the author of Idols Gallas 2. Aequum est vita privari eos c. It is just that they should be deprived of life which forsake God the author and fountaine of life Simler To leave the worship of God who is the author of life and to worship the devill the author of death and destruction mille mortibus c doth shew himselfe to be worthy of a thousand deaths Gallas 3. Though euery transgression of the law be in some sort a breach of Gods covenant yet idolatry more specially is said to be a transgression of the covenant of God Deut. 17.2 Because men apparently and professedly thereby forsake the profession solemnely made of their service and obedience vnto the Lord Simler 4. And this severe punishment the Lord appointeth for idolatrie quia inter Aegyptios idololatria assiâ—everant because the Israelites had accustomed themselves unto idolatry among the Egyptians in so much that they Moses yet living set up a golden calfe to worship Simler 5. Because of the ready inclination and propension of mans nature unto idolatry it was fit that it should by some severe punishment be restrained Calvin 6. And two things there are which doe exaggerate the nature of a sinne and aggravate the punishment thereof Res in quibâ—s committitur is in quos committitur c. The things wherein they are commited and they against whom they are committed Borrh. Both which concurre here in the sinne of apostasie and idolatrie For what mattâ—â— can be of greater moment than the service and worship of God and what sin more grievous than that which is committed against God QUEST XXXVIII Of kindnesse how to be shewed toward strangers and why Vers. 21. THou shalt not doe injury to a stranger 1. There are two reasone why men are apt to doe wrong unto strangers a both because they are not allied by affinity or consanguinity and therefore no naturall affection is commonly shewed toward them because they are destitute of friends and patrons and therefore lye more open to wrong Tostatus 2. The stranger must neither bee injured in word nor wronged in deed Simler Neither secretly by fraud nor openly by violence neither must they be hindred by any private man nor publikely prejudiced by lawes made against them Tostat. And it is not enough not to doe them wrong but we must help them and doe them what good we can Gallas 3. And this reason is added because they were strangers in Egypt they did feele by experience what it was to use strangers hardly that by
and thereof is called terumah an heave-offering QUEST XXXIII What is here understood by the heave-offering Vers. 28 FOr it is an heave-offering of the children of Israel 1. Some by Terumah which is a speciall name signifying an heave-offering doe understand in generall an oblation Vatarlus But the same word being in the next verse before used in a speciall signification for an heave-offering must bee also so taken here 2. Some doe take it in that speciall sense but then they restraine it only to the shoulder before spoken of which is called the shoulder of the heave-offering Osiander But it is evident in that a perpetuall Law is made for Aaron and his sonnes what part they should have of the peace-offerings and they had as well the shaken breast as the shoulder that was lifted up Levit. 27.34 that this clause must be understood of both those parts before spoken of the breast and the shoulder 3. Some by the heaving here understand only the dividing and separating of these parts which was to be made by the children of Israel So Oleaster and in the same sense the Latine Interpreter translateth primitivae sunt they are the first things that is the principall or best of the offerings of the children of Israel But the word terumah being before used in that speciall signification for an heave-offering should bee also so taken here 4. Therefore this terme terumah heave-offering is given both to the shaken breast and heaved shoulder of the more principall motion for these gifts were first of all by the Priest lifted up and presented before God in the hands of the Priest and in that respect were called an heave-offering Borrh. QUEST XXXIV Of the mysticall application of the shaking to and fro and of the breast and shoulder of the ram given unto the Priests FOr the mysticall application of these rites and ceremonies 1. In that part of the sacrifice was shaken to and fro on every side it signified Deum totius terra esse Dominum that God is Lord of the whole earth Oleaster and beside it betokened that Christi vera victimae merita beneficia c. that the merits and benefits of Christ the true sacrifice should by the preaching of the Gospell be spread abroad into all the world Borrh. But the Hebrewes exposition is fond who would have hereby signified that all men from all parts of the world should come to Jerusalem ibi optimâ aurâ fruituros there to have their health and to enjoy an wholesome aire Ex Oleastro For wee see that not by comming to Jerusalem but in departing from the earthly Jerusalem with the carnall rites thereof by preaching of the Gospell the Gentiles have received health and salvation of their soules which is more precious than the health of the body 2. In that part of the sacrifice was given unto the offerers to eat it sheweth that Christ did not only deliver himselfe unto death for us sed etiam in cibum dare c. but also giveth himselfe to be our meat nourishing us unto eternall life as he saith Ioh. 6.54 My flesh is meat indeed my bloud is drinke indeed c. Marbach 3. And in that the breast and shoulder are given unto the Priest it teacheth as Gregorie well saith Vt quod de sacrificio praecipitur sumere hoc de seipso discat authori immolare That what he is commanded to take of the sacrifice he should learne himselfe to offer unto God quod toto pectore oper◠c. that with all their heart and endevour they should watch upon their office Iun. Vt sint tanquam pectus humeri populi c. To be as the breast of the people to provide and take care for their soules and to bee as their shoulders to beare the burthen of their vocation Simler QUEST XXXV Of the consecrating of Aarons successour in his garments Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments c. 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth in the singular the holy garment but it is in the plurall bigdee garments for there was not one garment but many ten in all which were consecrated for the high Priest 2. The Priests which succeeded Aaron were not to use any other garments but those which Aaron was consecrated in as Eleazar put on Aaron priestly vesture when he was consecrated Priest in his fathers place Numb 20. Lyran. 3. And it is added shall be his sonnes after him whereby the use of these garments is not made generall to all the Priests but onely unto them which should succeed in the priesthood Cajetane 4. And this difference may be observed betweene the consecration of Aaron and his successour that Aaron in his consecration was both consecrated himselfe and his garments with him but his successour only was to be consecrated in those garments which needed not to be consecrated againe unlesse the old garments being old new were to be made in their place and then they were to be consecrated as Aarons priestly garments were at the first Tostat. quaest 13. 5. These garments the high Priest at the time of his consecration was to weare seven dayes together he was not afterward tied necessarily to weare them so long together but as his ministery and service required Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXXVI By whom the high Priests succeeding Aaron were consecrated Vers. 29. TO be consecrate therein 1. There were two high Priests consecrated extraordinarily first Aaron who received his consecration from Moses who was no Priest but only for the time executed that office in Aarons consecration secondly Eleazar was consecrated high Priest his father being yet living which was not afterward seene in any other succeeding high Priest for there could not be two high Priests together But Eleazar was consecrated his father yet living because the time of his death was certainly knowne as the Lord had shewed to Moses and immediatly after Eleazars consecration he died Numb 20 but this could not be knowne in any other high Priest 2. The rest of the high Priests which followed after Moses death were consecrated by the inferiour Priests Tistetus giveth an instance how the Pope at this day is consecrated by the Bishop of Hastia But the Gospell acknowledgeth no such high Priesthood and the Pope doth usurpe that place over other Churches therfore it is nothing to us how an usurper entreth A better instance may be given Act. 13.3 where certaine that were but Prophets and Doctors of the Church do yet lay their hands upon the Apostles Saul and Bernabas and so they did consecrate them to the worke whereunto they were called Therefore by the like example the inferiour Priests might consecrate the high Priest in the old Testament there being no other high Priest to do it QUEST XXXVII Whether Eleazar was consecrated after the manner here prescribed Vers. 30. THat sonne that shall be Priest in his stead c. Which is not understood onely of the next sonne of Aaron which should succeed him which
consecration Vers. 35 THou shalt do thus unto Aaron and to his sonnes c. 1. Some are of opinion that all things here prescribed to bee observed and done were de necessitate consecrationis of the necessitie of the consecration and if any thing were omitted the consecration was voide R. Salomon Lyranus But this is not like that if any thing were neglected in the manner of eating in respect of the place persons or time that their consecration should thereby have been void as Levit 10.17 Aaron being in griefe for the sudden death of Nadab and Abihu forgot the sinne offering which they should have eaten and suffered it to be all burnt and this was the eighth day after their consecration Levit. 9.2 when as yet the anointing was fresh upon them and they did not yet come forth of the doores of the Tabernacle Levit. 10.7 And yet notwithstanding this negligence there was no nullitie of Aarons consecration Tostat. quâ—st 18. 2. Therefore Tostatus opinion is rather to be received that some things were of necessitie in the consecration as the washing anointing of the Priests the putting on of the priestly apparell the sprinkling of themselves and their garments some things were only de solennitate belonging to the solemnitie of the consecration as the seething and eating of it in the holy place and eating it the same day it was a sin to omit any of these but thereby their consecration was not made voide QUEST XLI Why the consecration of the Priests continued seven daies Vers. 35. SEven daies shalt thou consecrate them c. 1. This consecration of the Priests was to continue seven daies together that both the Priests hereby might bee confirmed in their vocation and be assured thereof that they were thereunto appointed of God and that the people also might thereby take better notice that they were set apart by the Lord for that holy function Osiander 2. And further hereby thus much was signified that as the Priests seven daies together were consecrated so we per totum vitae curriculum throughout the whole course of our life should be consecrated and addicted to Gods service Simler Marbach 3. Likewise we are hereby admonished Pontificem continuo proficere non posse repente summum fieri c. that the Priest must daily increase and go forward that he cannot be made perfect at once that many gifts and graces are required in him Lippoman 4. It also sheweth that as their consecration was not perfect before the seventh day so we cannot attaine to perfection in this life Osiander QUEST XLII Whether all the sacrifices of the first day were iterated seven daies together or the sacrifice for sin only Vers. 36. ANd shalt offer everie day a calfe 1. Lyranus thinketh that not onely a calfe for a sinne offering was sacrificed everie day but two rammes also so that seven calves were offered and fourteene rammes in these seven daies So also Simler Borrh. Lippom. Pellican But seeing there is no mention made but only of the sinne offering we have no warrant to imagine any other sacrifice to have been iterated but that as belonging to their consecration 2. Iosephus thinketh yet more that all things were iterated every day which were done upon the first day as the anointing of them and the sprinkling of the Priests themselves and their garments But this is not like that their consecration was iterated it was sufficient for them once to be consecrated and seeing the ramme of consecration was killed onely upon the first day with the bloud whereof they were sprinkled they were so sprinkled but upon the first day 3. Tostatus his opinion is that the calfe which was the sacrifice for sinne and the consecration ramme were offered everie day expresse mention is made of the one and the other is implied in these words seven daies shalt thou fill their hands that is put into their hands part of the peace offering to be shaken to fro before the Lord as is prescribed vers 24. Now the ramme of burnt offering needed not to be daily offered during these seven dayes because there were every day morning and evening a lambe offered for a burnt sacrifice Sic Tostat. But this opinion cannot stand 1. Seeing Moses is bid to take two rams chap. 24.2 it is like that either both of them were â—â—nued every day or none 2. And the filling of their hands signifieth nothing else but the consecrating of their Ministery as is before shewed whereof the hand was the organe and instrument it is not literally to be pressed to signifie the putting of the things offered into their hands 4. Therefore according to the words of the text of all the sacrifices appointed for the first day onely the calfe which is the sinne offering is prescribed to be iterated and the reason is because it was to cleanse and purifie the Altar Levit. 8.15 But only in this sacrifice were the hornes of the Altar touched with bloud and so sanctified which was not done in any of the other sacrifices QUEST XLIII To what end the sinne offering was offered every day of the seven Vers. 36. THou shalt offer every day a calfe c. for reconciliation or to make atonement 1. This reconciliation was not only made for the sinne of the Priests as thinketh Tostatus for the hornes of the Altar were laid on with this bloud whereby it was purified Levit. 8.15 2. Neither yet was this sinne offering prescribed only ad expiandum Altare to cleanse the Altar as thinketh Osiander Calvin For he had said before seven dayes shalt thou consecrate them that is the Priests and then it followeth and shalt offer every day c. so that this daily offering for the space of seven dayes belonged unto the consecration of the Priests 3. Therefore the end of this sacrifice for sinne was both to make atonement for Aaron and his sonnes as also to purifie and cleanse the Altar Iunius QUEST XLIV How the Altar was cleansed and why Vers. 36. ANd thou shalt cleanse the Altar 1. After the consecration of the Priests is set forth their Ministery and service both at the Altar of burnt offering and in the golden altar in the next Chapter Here three things are declared concerning the Altar of burnt offering 1. How it should bee purified 2. What should bee offered thereon 3. The profit and benefit that should come thereby the Lord would there come unto them and speake with them vers 42. and dwell among them vers 45. Lyranus 2. Two things are required to the purifying of the Altar it must first be cleansed not that it was polluted of it selfe but to shew that in respect of man omnia corruptione naturae profana ob peccatum c. that all things by the corruption of our nature are profane because of sinne Gallas Marbach As also it was not only cleansed but sanctified and set apart for holy uses that it should not be lawfull to offer their sacrifices elsewhere
here is taken for the singular according to the Hebrew phrase Oleaster As so the Lord saith I have made thee Pharaohs god chap. 7.1 where the word is Elohim in the plurall and sometime a word of the plurall number is joyned with an adjective of the singular as Isai. 19.4 I will deliver the Egyptians into the hands adonim kasheh Dominorum duri of Lords hard where the adjective is put in the singular sometime the adjective that is joyned with it is put in the plurall also but the relative in the singular Iosh. 24.19 Elohim kadashim his he is holy gods that is an holy God so likewise sometime Elohim is put with a verbe singular as Gen. 1.1 Bara Elohim creavit Dii God created sometime with a verbe in the plurall as in this place asherjeeben which may goe before us So then Elohim gods in the plurall is here put for the singular Make us a god Tostat. qu. 4. QUEST VIII How the Israelites would have their god to be made to goe before them TO goe before us 1. It is evident by this wherefore they desired a visible god to be made not to that end that they might with greater libertie eat and drinke feast and play before the idoll which they could not doe before the Lord for the Lord did allow them to rejoyce before him in sober and seemely manner Nor yet because they bee like unto other nations to have some visible image to worship but they shew the end thereof that they might have some visible presence to goe before them Tostat. qu. 6. 2. And whereas Moses being absent they might have desired some other guide in his place to direct them they doe not so both because they know none could be given them like unto Moses and if such an one might be found he was subject to the like danger as they imagined Moses to be fallen into they desire rather some visible god to be given unto them Tostat. qu. 8. 3. Neither were they so senselesse to thinke that an idoll made of silver or gold which hath eyes and seeth not eares and heareth not could goe before them 4 And Tostatus conceit is too curious that because they had seene images in Egypt which had as they thought a certaine divine power in them speaking sometimes and making answer unto demands And among the rest the Egyptian God Apis which was like a pide bull did appeare once in a yeare unto them and used to goe before them unto Memphis and all the Egyptians followed after playing upon their harpâ— and other instruments he thinketh that the Israelites desired the like god to bee given them that they might have an image made endued with some divine power to goe before them But they never had seene any image in Egypt made with mens hands to stirre and move and walke before them The Egyptian god Apis was either a very pide pull indeed or the devill in that likenesse therefore they having seene no such president in Egypt it is not like they imagined any such thing 5. Wherefore these Elohim gods which they desire to be made were none other but images as Laban so calleth his little images gods Gen. 31. Gallas This then is the meaning that some image may be made them quae admoneret eos praesentiae divina which should admonish them of the divine presence Osiander And they say in effect but thus much Instituâ— nobis cultum c. Appoint us some kinde of worship that God may be reconciled unto us Vt pergat nos praecedere That he may go forward still before us as he hath begun Ferus So then their meaning is not that the idoll to be made should still goe before them but that God represented and reconciled thereby might goe on still with them QUEST IX Why the people came to Aaron rather than to Hur his fellow governour BUt it will bee here questioned why the people demand this rather of Aaron than of Hur who was joyned with him in the government chap. 24. 1. R. Salom. maketh this the reason because that the people had killed Hur because he resisted them and this he saith was the manner of his death al the people came and spet into his mouth and so choaked him But it is not like if Hur in so good a cause had given his life that it should have beene omitted Phinehes fact in slaying the adulterer and adulteresse is commended and honourable mention is made thereof but Hur had beene more worthie to have beene recorded for not killing but in suffering himselfe rather to bee killed in defence of Gods pure worship Tostat. qu. 3. 2. Neither yet is it to be supposed that Hur was dead for some mention then is like to have beene made of his death being a principall governour and of the peoples lamentation for him 3. Therefore although Hur may bee thought to have yeelded and consented to their motion as well as Aaron as not being a more holy man than hee yet because Aaron was the chiefe and more principall he onely is mentioned Tostat. qu. 3. QUEST X. Whether at this time the Israelites wanted the presence of the cloud FUrther whereas they desire gods to bee made to goe before them it will be here objected that they had the presence of the cloud which went before them and they therefore needed not to have had any other guide 1. Oleaster therefore thinketh that the cloud might at this time be taken out of their fight but this opinion is briefely confuted before quest 4. the cloud did not leave them till they came into the land of Canaan when the manna also ceased Iosh. 5. 2. Some make the blinde curiositie of the people the cause why they regarded not that ordinarie signe of Gods presence but requested some figure and representation of God answerable to their vanitie Calvin So also Chrysostom Adhuc iâ—spicis quod miraris oblitus es largitoris Thou seest daily that which thou wonderest at namely the manna which fell every morning and thou forgettest the giver 3. But this also may bee joyned to the former reason they had staied 40. dayes in a plat and the cloud stirred not they had continued as long in this place about mount Sinai even fortie dayes as they had beene in all the mansion places since their comming out of Egypt and so they might doubt that this cloud should be their direction no longer to goâ— before them into the promised land and therefore they desire another guide QUEST XI Why they say they knew not what was become of Moses Vers. 1. FOr of this Moses c. we know not what is become of him c. 1. R. Salom. thinketh they supposed he had beene dead and that Satan had made such an apparision in the aire as if they had indeed seene a coffin as if Moses had beene dead and his bodie put into it But if they had conceived that Moses were dead they would not have spoken
therefore thinketh right that these gates were onely the places of entrance into the great streets which went thorow the camp for the host lay in such order as that they had wayes and streets betweene their tents as wee see now in cities and townes as Iosephus also describeth the situation and disposing of the camp 3. Now Moses stood in the gate or entrance not because the use was to give sentence and judgement in the gates Lyran. Borrh. Or because Moses would have the Levites to give the onset in the beginning of a street and so to go thorow as Tostat. ibid. But this was the reason Moses tabernacle or tent was without the camp and so upon that occasion Moses stood in the entrance of the camp going now to his owne tent Iun. QUEST LXVIII Whether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie Vers. 26. ANd all the sonnes of Levi. R. Salom. to whom consenteth Tostatus thinketh Quod nullus de Levitis aliquid peccaverit That none of the Levites sinned in this great transgression because it is said All the sonnes of Levi gathered themselves unto him and if the Levites had sinned â—s other tribes there had beene no more cause to advance them to the Priesthood than other tribes Contra. 1. If that generall particle all bee pressed then it would follow that the children and all came which could not be for they were not able to use swords the meaning then is not that all the Levites came but all which came were Levites Iun. Sa. Or all is taken for many as this speech is usually restrained in Scripture as all nations are said to have come and bought corne in Egypt Gen. 41. 2. The Levites were more of Gods favour and grace than of their desert separated and selected for the Priesthood yet it is evident that this tribe was freer from consenting to this idolatrie than other tribes and for this their courage and readinesse in Gods service they received a blessing 2. Some thinke that even these Levites which armed themselves against their brethren were not altogether immunes à reatu free from this sinne but while they did it for feare levius peccarunt their sin was the lesse and so the mercie of the Lord appeared so much the more not only in pardoning their sin sed gloriam suam eorum manu asserere dignatus est but he vouchsafed by their hand to maintaine his glory Calvin Simler But it is not like that God would use their ministerie in the punishing of others which were guiltie of the same punishment themselves and their owne conscience accusing them they would have had no such courage to revenge the Lords cause upon their brethren it had beene also verie offensive to the guiltie parties to be punished by them which had beene alike guiltie And Moses proclaiming who pertaineth to the Lord let him come to me did meane that they only should come who had beene faithfull unto God and had not consented to that sinne 3. Some Hebrewes doe help the matter thus that because they cannot avoid it but that some of the kindred of the Levites were guiltie of this transgression because they did not spare their owne sonnes vers 29. that because it was lawfull for any of the other tribes to take unto them the wives of Levites their husbands being dead those children which they had by them might be said to be the sons of Levi that is grand children on their mothers side But this shift is taken away because Deut. 33.9 it is said that the Levites knew not their owne father or mother or children therefore they must needs bee understood to be Levites not by marriage or in some removed degree of kindred unto them but the immediate fathers and sonnes of Levites 4. Therefore the best opinion is that all of the tribe of Levi were not free from this sin of idolatrie many of them kept themselves as it is like at home and consented not but that a great sort even of Levi offended it may thus appeare 1. Because both Aaron himselfe was a ring-leader who can by no meanes be excused from this sin Lyranus 2. It could not be avoided but that many of the Levites were drawne away by Aarons example Iun. 3. But yet it is more evident because they consecrated their hands upon their owne sonnes and brethren yea their fathers and mothers that divers of the tribe of Levi fell away with the rest Lyran. Iun. Tostatus here answereth that the name of brethren is taken largely Pro fratribus qui sunt de filiis Israel For their brethren which were of the children of Israel qu. 35. Contra. 1. If it be allowed that the name of brethren is sometime so taken what saith he to the other names of father mother sonne These must be taken for the names of kindred or else we shall never have any certaintie in Scripture when we should by these names understand naturall fathers mothers and children 2. The other words companion and neighbour shew that the first is a name of kindred the first word ach signifieth here a brother in affinitie the second râ—ah a companion and friend the third karob Vicinia ratione conjunctum him that was a neighbour in dwelling and vicinitie or neernesse of place Simlerus 5. It is evident then that some of the Levites were accessarie to this great impietie because they were punished among the rest So that R. Salomon is herein greatly deceived who thinketh that the Levites though they were blame-worthy in not resisting the idolaters yet were not idolaters themselves neither consensu mentis nec facto exteriori in consent of minde nor in any outward fact c. for the Levites had beene unjustly punished if they had beene innocent Nay R. Moses Egyptius goeth further saying that although the Israelites often are found to have committed idolatrie yet Levita nunquam idolatraverunt the Levites never committed idolatrie But the contrarie is evident by Aarons fall for hee apparantly was an idolater in his externall act in building an altar unto the golden Calfe and offering sacrifice before it Paulus Burgensis in his reply proceedeth yet further that when our blessed Saviour was put to death the Levites as they are distinguished from the Priests were not principeâ— in crimine illo pâ—ssimo principall agents in that wicked crime whereas it is evident that the Priests were the chiefe enemies that Christ had the Levites indeed are not named but seeing the high Priest with the other Priests which were of the tribe of Levi were the contrivers of Christs death then cannot that whole tribe be exempted from this villanous act which is the intendment of Burgensis a great favourer of that nation QUEST LXIX Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them Vers. 27. THus saith the Lord c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that it is not necessarie here to understand that Moses had any speciall commandement
9.20 4. Therefore these may be the causes why Moses prayeth againe 1. The Lord granted before that he would not destroy all the people at once sed 〈◊〉 ex inâ—ervallo vel per partes but whether he would doe it in continuance of time and as it wore by peecemeale hee knew not which he prayeth for here Lippom. 2. And there might be other sinnes as well as this for the which the Lord should be angry with them as Deut. 9.18 he saith he prayed and fasted because of all their sins Tostat. 3. And now he prayeth not only for the turning away or judgements but that the Lord would be againe fully reconciled unto his people and restore them to their former state and condition of favour Simler 4. And he prayeth not only for the pardoning of their temporall punishment but against everlasting death which sinne deserveth Osiander QUEST LXXVIII What booke it was out of the which Moses wisheth to be raced Vers. 32. IF thou wilt not race me out of the booke which thou hast written 1. By this booke R. Salomon understandeth the booke of the Law as Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law hee desireth if the Lord were purposed to destroy the people that his name should not be mentioned in the Law nor he taken to be the Law-giver for to what purpose should he be spoken of as a Law-giver unto that people which was not Contra. But this is not the meaning 1. Because the bookes of the Law were not yet written Moses therefore would not desire to be raced out of a booke which was not 2. Neither would Moses aske that of God which was in his owne power to doe now Moses did write the booke of the Law and he might have left out his owne name if he would 3. Againe Moses setteth against this great benefit the safety of the people the greatest losse which he could have but this had beene no such great losse unto Moses not to have his name remembred in any such written booke 4. Moses here useth a disjunctive speech Doâ— this or else race mee c. but if he meant the racing of his name out of the booke of the Law there had beene no disjunction at all for one had followed upon the other for if Israel had beene destroyed neither should Moses have written the booke of the Law which was only given unto Israel for it had beene in vaine to give Lawes unto a people that were not 5. Moses also speaketh of a booke which God had written now Moses writ the booke of the Law the ten Commandements only were written with Gods hand Tostat. quaest 41. 2. R. Abraham Francus who writeth upon Aben Ezra understandeth the racing out of this booke of the death of the body and he addeth further that there is quaedam rota coelestâ—â— a certaine celestiall wheele wherein are many starres which worke by their influence upon those iâ—â—eriour bodies and by the moving of this wheele death or life is caused so that thus he would interpret Moses speech Cause me by the motion of this wheele to dye But seeing the motion of this wheele which he imagineth is the naturall cause as he supposeth of life and death Moses could not dye naturally before his time came and if now he should have died it had beene not a naturall death but supernaturally caused by God therefore not by the motion of any such wheele Tostat. ibid. 3. Hierom also differeth not much from this former opinion in substance understanding Moses desire of death in this life he wisheth Perire in praesentiam non in perpetnum To perish for the present not for ever But whereas the Lord afterward answereth Moses Whosoever hath sinned will I put out of my booke vers 33. it followeth that they which sinne not that is without repentance are not put out of that booke but all as well the righteous as unrighteous the just and the sinners are subject to this temporall death therefore Moses speaketh not of that 4. Hierom hath beside another opinion for upon that place Psalm 69.28 Let them bee put out of the booke of life neither let them bee written with the righteous he inferreth that God hath two bookes viventium justorum of the living and of the righteous that was the booke of the living In quo ante adventum Dei Prophetae Patriarchae scripti sunt Wherein the Prophets and Patriarkes were written before the comming of God in the flesh the other wherein the faithfull are written whereof our blessed Saviour speaketh Rejoyce because your names are written in the booke of life and of the first Moses saith he speaketh in this place So some doe understand this booke in the same sense with Hierom of the booke of Gods Covenant which hee made with Israel out of the which the Gentiles were excluded of which mention is made Ezech. 13.9 where the Lord saith that the false Prophets shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel So Moses desireth here not to be counted of the family of Israel wherein all the Prophets and Patriarkes were written But if Israel had now perished the booke of Gods Covenant with Israel likewise should have beene no more remembred therefore it had beene superfluous for Moses to desire to be raced out of that booke And againe the booke of the living mentioned in the Psalme is the same with the booke of life spoken of Apocal. 3.5 I will not put his name out of the booke of life In which booke of life not only the Prophets and Patriarkes before Christ but all the faithfull before and since are written 5. Cajetane understandeth it De libro principatuâ— in hoc mundo Of the booke of principality and preeminence in the world for it is decreed with God as in a booke Quod isto vel illi principentur in hac vita That such or such shall beare rule in this life And so Moses desireth to lose his principality and government which the Lord promised him that hee would make of him a great nation c. But whereas they which sinned only are taken out of this booke of life and yet many wicked and evill men are governours in the world it cannot be meant of any such booke or decree of principalitie or government 6. Oleaster by this booke thinketh to be understood the booke of the acts and doings of the righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 But there are many righteous men whose names and acts were not written in that booke which is now thought also to be lost therefore it had beene no great matter for Moses to wish to be put out of that booke 7. Burgensis maketh foure bookes of God 1. One is the booke of life wherein only are written the names of the Elect that are ordained unto life as when souldiers are written in the muster booke which are pressed and appointed for warre 2. That also may be called the booke
quantum praedestinati sunt in noticia Divina as they are ordained to salvation in the knowledge and prescience of God and they that are thus written can never bee blotted out another way they are scripti secundum quid written after a sort not according to the divine prescience or predestination Sed secundum dispositionem in eis actu existentem secundum praesentem justitiam But according to their disposition which is in act in them and according to their present justice and thus are they said to be blotted out not in respect of Gods knowledge as though any thing can fall out against his prescience but in respect of their change from grace into sinne 2. Thomas also to the same purpose some are said to bee blotted out Non secundum rei veritatem sed secundum hominum opinionem Not according to the truth of the thing but in the opinion of men for it is usuall in Scripture ut aliquid dicatur fieri quando innotescit that a thing should be said to be done when it appeareth So some are said to be written in the booke of life quia homines ibi opinantur scriptos propter presentem justitiam because men thinke they are there written in respect of their present justice Then some are there written ex pradestinatione by predestination which can never bee blotted out Some ex gratia in respect of their present grace which they may fall from and so be blotted out And againe in another place he expresseth the same thing in other termes Some are predestinate of God Insâ— ut simpliciter habituri vitam aeternam Simply to have life eternall in themselves and these are so written in the booke of life as they can never be blotted out And some are so written Vt habeant vitam aeternam non in se sed in sua causa To have life eternall not in themselves but in respect of their cause and present state of Justice which when they fall from they are said to be blotted out 3. So before them both Augustine We must not so take it brethren Quod quenquam Deus scribat in librâ— vitae deleat illum That God writeth any in the booke of life and blotteth him out for if a mortall man said that I have written I have written shall we thinke that God writeth and blotteth out Praescius est Deus praedestinavit omnes ante constitutionem mundi regnaturos cum filio God foreseeth all things and he did predestinate all before the making of the world that should reigne with his sonne c. Therefore this is said Secundum spem ipsorum qui ibi se scriptos putabant That some are written which are said to be blotted out in their owne opinion because they thought they were there written so that where it is said let them be blotted out of the booke of life the meaning is ut ipsos constet non illos ibi esse that it may appeare unto them that they are not there To this purpose Augustine as he is alleaged both by Simlerus and Borrhaius 4. Tostatus followeth the same distinction that some are written in the booke of life secundum firmam praedestinationem according to Gods sure predestination some only secundum praesentem justitiam in respect of their present justice these may bee blotted out and not the other but he addeth further that so likewise in the booke of Gods prescience wherein onely they are written whose end is damnation some are written there secundum firmam Dei praescientiam according to Gods firme prescience others secundum praesentem injustitiam according to their present injustice These may be blotted out and not the other And this writing of them in one booke according to their present justice in the other according to their present injustice he calleth the writing foris without the booke the other writing according to Gods predestination and prescience he saith is intus within the booke Then out of these positions he inferreth certaine conclusions 1. That it is possible for one to be written in both these bookes the booke of life and the booke of death together in the one according to Gods predestination or prescience in the other according to their present justice or injustice As he which is predestinate unto life may according to his present state of injustice be written in the booke of death foris without as Paul while he was yet a persecutor and one may be in Gods prescience written in the booke of death and yet according to his present state of grace he may be written in the booke of life as Iudas while yet he continued in Christs obedience and preached the Gospell 2. Yet it is possible for one to be written twice in the same booke both in regard of Gods prescience and his owne state and condition as Moses was thus written in the booke of life and Iudas when he betrayed Christ in the booke of death 3. They which are written in the booke of life according to predestination may be blotted out thence according to their present state and condition as David when he sinned and so in the other booke likewise as Saul while he was yet a vertuous King he was written in the booke of rejection in Gods prescience but blotted out in regard of his present justice 4. But he that is written in the booke of life according unto predestination cannot be written in the booke of death according to Gods prescience and so on the other side because one and the same cannot be foreseene of God both to salvation and condemnation 5. And they which are written according to their present justice in the booke of life cannot at the same time be written in the booke of death according to their present injustice because one cannot at the same time be counted righteous and wicked before God Tostat. qu. 43. But these exceptions may worthily be taken unto Tostatus conclusions 1. Because he maketh a booke of death and speaketh of putting in and blotting out of that booke whereas the Scripture acknowledgeth only a booke of life not any of death for not to be written in the booke of life though they bee not written in any other blacke booke is sufficient unto everlasting perdition 2. He calleth the booke of death the booke of Gods prescience only as though God were not a Judge also in condemning the vessels of wrath into hell and ordaining them justly thereunto as he is in the electing the vessels of honour to salvation 3. It is an errour that God writeth any in either of those bookes on the backside in respect of their present state or condition of justice or injustice for Gods writing there is unchangeable they are there said to be written in regard of their present state secundum spem ipsorum in their owne hope as Augustine or secundum opinionem hominâ—m according to the opinion of men that thinke them to be there written as Thomas before
34. qu. Of the forbidden uses whereunto this oyntment should not be put 35. qu. VVhether the anointing of Kings were not against this law 36. qu. What it is to be cut off from his people 37. qu. The spirituall application of this holy oyntment 38. qu. Of the spices whereof the holy perfume was made 39. qu. What is understood here by the word Sammâ—m spices 40. qu. Of the composition and manner of making this perfume 41. qu. Of the spirituall application of this incense 42. qu. How the Lord talked with Moses in the Mercie seat whether in any visible shape Questions upon the thirtie one Chapter 1. QUest How the Lord is said to call Bezaleel by name 2. qu. Whether Caleb the sonne of Jephuneh were grandfather to this Bezaleel 3. qu. Whether this Hur were the same before mentioned chap. 24.14 supposed to bee Moses brother in law 4. qu. Of the age of Bezaleel 5. qu. Of the difference betweene the gifts of wisdome understanding and knowledge 6. qu. Whether all the kinds of works are rehearsed here which were necessarie for the Tabernacle 7. qu. Whether the wise in heart received a new gift or increase rather of the old 8. qu. Why Moses was not made fit to doe the worke of the Tabernacle 9. qu. Of the garments of ministration what they were 10. qu. The spirituall signification of the furnishing of Bezaleel and Aholiab with gifts 11. qu. Why the precept concerning the Sabbath is here renued 12. qu. Why it was more forbidden to labour in the buiâ—ding of the Sanctuarie upon the Sabbath than for the Priests to sacrifice 13. qu. How the Sabbath is said to be a signe that the Lord did sanctifie them 14. qu. The reasons why the Sabbath must bee observed 15. qu. What death is meant in this phrase He shall die the death 16. qu. Why the seventh day is called Sabbath Sabbaton 17. qu. How the observation of the Sabbath is perpetuall 18. qu. Whether the world were made successively in time or in an instant 19. qu. How the Lord is said to have rested and from what 20. qu. What works are to bee rested from upon the Lords day what not 21. qu. Whether Moses received the directions concerning the Tabernacle 22. qu. VVhy Moses stayed fortie dayes in the mount with the Lord. 23. qu. VVhy the Lord gave the written law 24. qu. VVhy the Lord gave the law to the Israelites and to no other people 25. qu. VVhy the Lord delivered only two tables of the law 26. qu. VVhy the tables were made of stone 27. qu. VVhat is meant here by the 〈◊〉 of God 28. qu. VVhether Moses did write upon the tables 29. qu. How the law is said to have beene ordained by Angels Questions upon the two aâ—d thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest VVhether Moses had signified unto the people when he would returne 2. qu. VVhether the Egyptians were the first beginners and motioners of this idolatrie 3. qu. The occasions of idolatrie in generall and particularly of the idolatrie of the Israelites here 4. qu. Of the divers faults and infirmities at once here committed by the people 5. qu. VVhy the people say unto Aaron rise 6. qu. Of the divers kinds of idolatrie 7. qu. VVhy they say Make us gods not god 8. qu. How the Israelites would have their god to bee made to goe before them 9. qu. VVhy the people came to Aaron rather than to Hur his fellow Governour 10. qu. VVhether at this time the Israelites wanted the presence of the cloud 11. qu. VVhy they say they knew not what was become of Moses 12. qu. VVhy Aaron bad them pull off their earings Quaest. 141. in Exod. 13. qu. VVhether Aarons sinne is here to be excused Epist. 83. 14. qu. Of the greatnesse of Aarons sinne 15. qu. VVhy it pleased God to suffer Aaron to fall 16. qu. Why the golden Calfe is said to bee fashioned with a graving toole 17. qu. Why Aaron caused the likenesse of a Calfe to be made rather than of any other thing 18. qu. Whether the Israelites thought indeed the golden Calfe to be the God that delivered them 19. qu. Why Aaron proceeded to build an Altar before the golden Calfe 20. qu. How Aaron proclaimed a holy day unto the Lord. 21. qu. Of the sacrifices who and what was offered upon the Altar that Aaron made 22. qu. What is meant in that it is said They rose to play 23. qu. Whether this sinne of Aaron and the Israelites can any way be excused 24. qu. Of the lawfulnesse of play and recreation and how it must be moderated 25. qu. Why the Lord biddeth Moses get him downe 26. qu. Why the Lord saith to Moses Thy people 27. qu. Of the greatnesse of the sinne of the Israelites as the Lord himselfe describeth it 28. qu. VVhy they are called a people of a stiffâ— necke 29. qu. Why the Lord did not prevent the sinne of the people at the first 30. qu. Why and in what sense the Lord saith to Moses Let me alone 31. qu. VVhether the Lord changed his minde in saying I will destroy them and yet destroyed them not 32. qu. How the Lord promised to make a great nation of Moses 33. qu. Of Moses prayer in generall and the manner thereof 34. qu. Of the reasons which Moses useth in his prayer 35. qu. Why the Egyptians were more like thus to object than any other nation 36. qu. In what sense the Egyptians would say The Lord brought them out to slay them 37. qu. Why Moses maketh mention in his prayer of Abraham Isaak and Jacob. 38. qu. How the Israelites are promised to possesse the land of Canaan for ever 39. qu. How the Lord is said to repent 40. qu. Whether Moses at this time were kept in suspence or indeed obtained pardon for the people 41. qu. VVhat was written in the tables of stone 42. qu. Why there were but two tables neither more nor fewer 43. qu. How the tables were written on both sides 44. qu. Why the tables are called the worke of God 45. qu. How many precepts each table contained 46. qu. Whether the writing of the tables were the first writing in the world 47. qu. Where Joshua stayed all the while Moses was in the mount 48. qu. Whether Joshua first heard the noise 49. qu. Why Moses anger was kindled at the sight of the Calfe and not before 50. qu. Whether Moses sinned in his anger 51. qu. Whether Moses offended in breaking the tables of the Law 52. qu. What the breaking of the tables signified 53. qu. In what part the tables were broken and what became of the fragments 54. qu. Why the tables were broken at the bottome of the mount 55. qu. Whether the Calfe were burned to powder in the fire 56. qu. Why the powder of the golden Calfe is cast into the river 57. qu. How the Israelites were brought to drinke of the water and why 58. qu. Wherefore the people were compelled to drinke the
should contemne all things in respect of him and refuse no labour nor spare cost to gaine Christ as S. Paul counted all things dung to win Christ Philip. 3.8 5. Mor. Religion must not be professed for gaine but for Religions sake Vers. 23. SHall not their flocks and substance be ours They accept of circumcision not of any love to the worship of God but of a covetous mind for their owne profit for the which cause God was angry with them It is therefore a dangerous thing to dally with God and to make religion a cloake for our covetous and carnall affections S. Paul noteth some that thinke gaine to be godlinesse 1. Tim. 6.5 such are they which professe the Gospel not for conscience but for gaine and advantage Mercer CHAP. XXXV 1. The Contents IN this chapter first are declared such things as befell Iacob to vers 23. then mention is made of his sons their names and number and of the buriall of his father vers 23. to the end The things which concerne Iacob specially are set forth by the places where they were done 1. In Sechem God appeareth to Iacob and biddeth him goe to Bethel vers 1. then Iacob reformeth his house and hideth their strange gods under an oake vers 2. to 5. then he taketh his journey prosperously 2. In Bethel Deborah dieth and is buried under an oake vers 7.8 And there God appeareth to him againe and confirmeth the promise made where Iacob builded an altar for a memoriall vers 9. to vers 16. 3. Neere unto Ephrah Rachel dieth in travaile Benjamin is borne Iacob setteth up a pillar to vers 20. 4. In Migdalâ—eder Ruben lay with Bilha vers 21.22 2. The divers readings v. 2. Iacob his whole house being called together said H. Iacob said to his house and all that were with him caeter v. 3. His word was my helpe in the way which I walked C. he was with me in the war c. caeter v. 4. They gave Iacob the Idols of the people C. strange gods caet the gods of strange people â— for strange nechar is put in the singular number and so cannot be the substantive to gods celâ—be which is in the plurall under a terebinth H. S. under an oake caeter â—elab signifieth both and he lost them to this day and Israel went from Sechem S. v. 5. they durst not follow after them going away H. they did not follow the sonnes of Iacob caeter v. 8. she was buried in the plainâ— of the valley Ch. under an oake caeter and he called the name of it the oake of mourning H.S.B. the valley of mourning C. Allon Bacâ—tâ— caeter alun an oake â—elon a plaine v. 11. I am thy God S. I am God almighty caeter shadai heb v. 13. and he went away from him H. and the glory of God ascended in that place where he spake with him Ch. and God ascended from him in that place where he spake with him caeter v. 15. he called the name of the place Bethel H. Iacob called the name of the place where God spake with him Bethel caeter v. 16. Iacob pitched his tent beyond the tower of Hader S. this is transposed out of the 21. vers and inserted here which clause the rest have not v. 16. He came in the spring to the ground which leadeth to Ephrata H. when he came neare to Cibrath to come to Ephrata S. there was a fields breadth or space of ground to come to Ephrata C. T. B. about halfe a daies journey G. about a mile P. he Cibrath of Barah to eat which signifieth a space of ground which may be gone before the time of the first eating or baiting v. 21. He pitched his tents beyond the tower of the flocke H.C. the tower of Eder caet Migdal Eder G. v. 22. Israel heard it and it seemed evil in his sight S. and Israel heard it caet v. 27. to Mamre a citie of the field S. kiriah Arbe B. a citie of 〈◊〉 caeter 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. How the Lord spake to Iacob and when Vers. 1. THen God said to Iacob 1. Whether God spake to Iacob by dreame or manifest â—ision it is not expressed whether way we take there is no inconvenience but it is most like that God spake to Iacob immediatly as he used to doe to the patriarkes without the ministery of prophets Mercer 1. This was some thirty yeares after God had appeared to Iacob in Bethel for he had beene 20. yeares in Labans house 8. yeares in Sichem 2. yeares in his journey so that he was now about 106 yeares old whereupon Ramban thinketh that God punished Iacob in the ravishing of his daughter because he had forgotten his vow and so long deferred it ex Mercer QUEST II. What strange Gods Iacob putteth away and why so called Vers. 2. PVt away the strange Gods c. 1. These might be those idols which Rachel stole from Laban as also such as were taken in the spoyle of the city of Shechem Mercer 2. Iacob neither winked at the superstition of Rachel of a blind love toward her as Calvin neither need hee to bee instructed by revelation of this misdemeanour of his house as Rupertus Iacob was not such a stranger in his owne house but that it might otherwise come to his notice 3. They are called strange Gods not because they estranged mens minds from God or because they were the idols of devils that were alienissimi estranged in affection from men Perer. or because they were strange that is unknowne Gods that were not able to helpe in the time of adversity ut Hebrâ—â— but because they were the Gods of strange people from Israel and so are the words truly translated the Gods of strange people Iun. QUEST III. Why Iacob did choose to bury not to burne the idols Vers. 4. ANd Iacob hid them under an oake c. 1. This is not to be imputed to Iacobs infirmity that burned not those idols but buried them as Calvin 2. Nor yet did he burie them that the matter thereof might afterwards serve for some profitable use as some thinke that David found them and imployed them toward the building of the temple histor scholastic 3. Nor yet is it like that Iacob melted them into one lumpe and after buried them in a deep pit as Tostatus 4. But it is more like that Iacob for haste of his journey wanted opportunity to consume them with fire Cajetan or hee rather chose in silence to burie them for feare further to offend and exasperate the Canaanites Mercer and hee did it in a secret and unknowne place that his familie should not doat after them againe Iun. QUEST IV. Why mention is made of the death of Deborah Rebeckahs nurse Vers. 8. DEborah Rebeckahs nurse died c. 1. She is called Rebeckahs nurse not because she suckled her but was her bringer up and instructer 2. Deborah was at this
time about 180. yeares of age for it was 170. yeares since she came first with Rebeckah into Canaan when shee may well bee supposed to have beene 50. yeare old having the charge and government of Rebeckah 3. It is very like that Rebeckah was now departed for otherwise Deborah would not have left her so long as shee lived 4. There is no mention of Rebeckahs death not because she was buried obscurely and in the night as the Hebrews imagine Isaack being blind and none to bury her but Esau but it is the use of Scripture to make rare mention of the death of women in this place Deborahs death is recorded as an accident that fell out by the way Mercer QUEST V. How Deborah came to be in Iacobs company NOw whereas the question is moved how Deborah came to be in Iacobs company 1. Neither is it like that after she had accompanied Rebeckah into Canaan she went back againe and was now desirous to goe aad see Rebeckah as Chrysostome for shee was sent with Rebeckah to remaine with her 2. Neither did she goe with Iacob at the first when he went into Mesopotamia as Calvin for he was alone in Bethel 3. Neither was she sent as a messenger to fetch Iacob out of Mesopotamia as the Hebrewes for he returned at Gods commandement not at his mothers call 4. Neither as Ramban is it to be supposed that Rebeckah had more nurses then one 5. But it is like that Deborah was sent to meet Iacob being returned Mercer or went to him of her owne accord after Rebeckahs death Cajetan QUEST VI. Of the number of the visions wherein God appeared to Iacob Vers. 9. Againe God appeared unto Iacob c. Not as though this were the second vision in all which Iacob had but it was another vision beside that mentioned in the beginning of the chapter where he is bid to goe up to Bethel or it was the second time that God appeared unto him in Bethel for otherwise to count all the visions that Iacob had this was in number the seventh 1. God appeared unto him in Bethel in the vision of the ladder 2. When in a dreame he was shewed the parti-coloured sheepe Genes 31.11 3. When the Lord bade him returne into his owne countrey Gen. 31.3 4. When the Angels met him Gen. 32.2 5. When the Angell wrestled with him 6. When God bid him goe up to Bethel 7. God appeared againe unto him in Bethel Perer. QUEST VII Whether the name of Israel is here new imposed or but renewed Vers. 10. THy name shall be no more called Iacob but Israel c. 1. Neither iâ— this the same vision which Iacob had when he wrestled with the Angel as Oleaster because the same name is imposed for the text saith that God appeared againe to Iacob vers 9. that is in Bethel 2. Neither as Hierome thinketh was the name of Iacob onely foretold then and imposed now tradit in Genes as Peters name is designed Iohn 1. but actually given him Matth. 12.16 Thom. Anglic. for before this Iacob is twice called by the name of Israel Genes 33.10 and Gen. 34.7 3. Neither as Tostatus and Lyranus thinke is the same name imposed in both places but upon divers reasons for in the first place hee is called Israel because hee prevailed with God and therefore much more with men to signifie his fortitude in the active life but here is named Israel that is seeing God in respect of the contemplative life the which he had now atchived But there appeared no difference at all in the reason and signification of the name for as there by the name Israel hee is comforted and fortified against Esau so here against the Canaanites that thought to have revenged the slaughter of the Sichemites 4. Wherefore wee say that the same name upon the like occasion is here imposed and that this is but a repetition and confirmation of the other vision and thereupon Iacob being confident doth now more openly call himselfe Israel Mercer Iun. And so it is not unusuall in Scripture to have the same promises often repeated as those made to Abraham of the multiplying of his seed and possessing of the land of Canaan which were often revived and renewed as Gen. 15.17.22 Perer. QUEST VIII How it is said thy name shall bee no more called Iacob FVrther whereas the Lord saith thy name shall be no more called Iacob and yet hee is afterward called Iacob 1. Augustine thinketh that he was called Iacob in respect of this life onely where he should wrestle as his name signifieth with many temptations but hee was called Israel in respect of the life to come quast 114. in Gen. But this solution beeing mysticall and this mutation of Iacobs name historicall satisfieth not Much like is the solution of Tostatus that he was called Iacob in respect of his active life but Israel for his contemplative neither is this answer sufficient to say he should be called by both names but in a diverse sense for the text denieth unto him the name of Iacob any more 3. Nor yet doe wee approve the solution of Cajetan Vatab. that for vltra no more put in tantum thou shalt not onely be called Iacob for thus the text is forced 4. Pererius thus interpreteth not that he should be so much called by the name Israel as have the thing thereby signified as strength and power with God as it is said of Christ he should be called Emanuel that is God with vs yet was not Christ so called who was indeed God with vs But this sense is not so proper for Iacob was usually called by the name of Israel 5. Therefore the meaning is rather this that although the name of Iacob should remaine yet the last was more honourable and excellent and should obscure that other Muscul. Mercer 1. In respect of the author the name Iacob was given by men the name Israel by God 2. In signification it was more excellent Iacob signifieth a supplanter because hee held Esau by the heele but Israel is interpreted one that prevailed with God 3. The name Israel was given to the whole nation and posteritie of Iacob who of Israel were called Israelites not of Iacob Iacobites QUEST IX What Kings came out of Iacobs loynes Vers. 11. KIngs shall come out of thy loynes c. 1. The Hebrewes specially referre it to Saul and Isboseth that were Kings of Benjamin and to the tribes of Ephraim and Manasses 2. But because that Saul and his house were rejected of God and the kingdome of Israel was but an usurpation it is specially to be applied to David and the other kings of Iudah Calvin 3. It may also be understood of the kings of the Gentiles converted to the faith who spiritually were borne of Iacob Mercer 4. These nations that came out of Iacobs loynes were the twelve tribes that multiplied increased as so many seueral nations QUEST X. How the land of Canaan is given to
should not set our affections upon earthly things but presse forward in our desire toward our heavenly Countrey 5. Morall Good officers should not seeke to inrich themselves Vers. 14. IOseph laid up the money in Pharaohs house Ioseph was a faithfull officer to Pharaoh he did not seeke to inrich himselfe by his office but sought the Kings profit and increased his treasure Mercer Such an one was Iosua who in the division of the land of Canaan to the tribes did not share any thing to himselfe but the children of Israel gave him an inheritance among them when they had made an end of dividing the land Ios. 19.49 Such should officers and Judges be toward the King and people to deale faithfully with the one and justly with the other not to turne all to their owne profit and gaine as many doe now adayes CHAP. XLVIII 1. The Method and Argument of the Chapter FIrst in this Chapter is declared how Ioseph came to visit Iacob when he was sicke Secondly Iacobs testament is set downe first concerning Iosephs sonnes then his gift and legacie toward Ioseph himselfe vers 22. with a generall prophecie of the returne of all his children vers 21. Concerning Iosephs sons 1. The ground and occasion of Iacobs blessing of them is expressed which is first the promise of God vers 4. then the right property that Iacob had in them vers 5. Thirdly because Rachel was taken away leaving not much issue behinde her vers 7. and Ioseph was the eldest of her who was his principall wife 2. Iacobs blessing followeth first the preparation to the blessing where we have set forth 1. Iacobs kissing and embracing of Manasses and Ephraim vers 9 10. 2. Iosephs reverence to his father vers 12. 3. The presenting of his two sonnes and the order of disposing them Manasses to Iacobs right hand and Ephraim to his left vers 13. Secondly in the blessing 1 There is the ceremonie the laying on of Iacobs hands contrary to Iosephs expectation the right hand upon the youngest the left upon the eldest vers 14. 2. The pronouncing of the blessing which sheweth the author or efficient cause God who had fed him and delivered him vers 15 16. and the effects the naming of them among the tribes and their great increase and multiplying vers 16. 3. The ratification of the blessing where we have first Iosephs exception vers 17 18. then Iacobs answer containing a satisfaction to Ioseph vers 8 9. a confirmation of the blessing vers 20. 2. The divers readings v. 1. It was told to Iacob H.S.C. one told Iacob caet v. 7. Concerning the divers reading of this verse see before chap. 35. vers 16. and quest 13. upon that Chapter v. 7. I buried her in the way of the horse-race S. neare the way to Ephrata caet v. 11. I am not deprived of thy face H.S. I had not thought to have seene thy face caet v. 14. He layed his left hand upon the head of Manasses which was the elder changing his hands H.S. hee taught his hands although Manasses was the elder C. guiding or directing his hands of purpose for Manasseh was the elder B. G. he knew feeling with his hands that Manasses was the elder T. caused his hands to understand that Manasseh was the elder P. sacal to understand v. 15. God whom my fathers pleased in his sight S. served in his sight C. walked in his sight cat halach to walke v. 16. That they may grow into a multitude S.H. grow as fish into a multitude cat v. 20. In thee Israel shall be blessed H.S.C. shall blesse caet v. 21. The word of God shall be your helpe C. God shall be with you caet v. 22. I give thee Sechem the chiefe part above thy brethren S. I have given thee one portion of land c. B. I give thee one principall part or portion above c. C.G.T. Sechem signifieth a part portion or elbow of ground and it is also the proper name of a place Which I tooke out of the hand of the Amorites by my prayer and deprecation C. by my sword and my bow caet 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of the adopting of Manasseh and Ephraim into the degree of Iacobs sonnes Vers. 5. MAnasseh and Ephraim shall be mine as Ruben and Simeon are mine 1. Iacob upon Gods promise that he should increase into many people by the spirit of prophecie adopteth Manasseh and Ephraim into the number of his sonnes that seeing Rachel was taken away before he had many children by her he should by these be increased 2. He adopteth them in the place of Ruben and Simeon the two elder brethren and so the birth-right is conveyed from Ruben to Iosephs sonnes because he had defiled his fathers bed 1 Chron. 5.1 3. Here we have the practice of that law afterward established Deut. 22.17 of allotting a double part to the eldest Iun. for Ioseph had a double part in that two tribes came of him whereas the rest of his brethren had but each one his tribe Manasseh and Ephraim had not each of them his double part to the rest as some Hebrewes thinke but they two being the fathers of the two tribes doe make their fathers part double to the rest Mercer QUEST II. Whether Ioseph had any other sonnes beside Manasseh and Ephraim Vers. 6. THe linage which thou hast gotten after them c. 1. This is to be understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 potentially which thou maiest get afterward for the Scripture maketh no mention of any sonnes beside these two that Ioseph had at this present Iun. Mercer as also it might be uncertaine whether Iosephs wife were at this time with childe Mercer 2. The other sonnes should be more properly Iosephs yet so as that they should make no tribe of themselves but be accounted with Manasseh and Ephraim Iun. 3. They are deceived which thinke that Machir and Galaad of Manasseh and others of Ephraim were those other sonnes of Ioseph for they are his nephewes and Manasseh and Ephraim were their fathers not their brethren also some thinke that if Ioseph had begotten any other sonnes they should have had no inheritance in Canaan but this is not like seeing they came of Iacob whose whole seed was chosen likewise whether Ioseph had afterward any other sonnes it is uncertaine it is like he had not because no mention is made of them in Scripture neither doth it much skill seeing they were to be annexed and incorporate into these two tribes of their brethren Mercer QUEST III. Why Iacob maketh mention of the death and buriall of Rachel Vers. 7. I Buried in the way to Ephrath 1. Iacob maketh mention of the death and buriall of Rachel 1. Not to answer a secret objection why he buried not Rachel in the double cave with his fathers as he himselfe desired to be buried and thereupon tooke an oath of Ioseph because she died
suddenly in the way and he had no time to carry her thither being in his journey Iacob had no need to make any such excuse to Ioseph ex Mercer 2. But these reasons may be yeelded why Iacob bringeth in mention hereof 1. To call to Iosephs remembrance that Rachel forsooke her fathers house and sojourned with Iacob in Canaan that Ioseph might hereby be stirred up to be willing much more to leave Egypt which was not his country Calvin 2. As also that hee might have a greater desire to the place of his mothers sepulture 3. Further in that Iacob buryed her in the way being so neare to the city because he would not bury her among Idolaters by the way he admonisheth Ioseph to detest the Idolatry of Egypt 4. But the cheifest reasons of the mentioning of this matter are one that seeing Rachel died leaving no great issue behinde her Iacob hopeth that Gods promise for the multiplying of his seed should be fulfilled in these two Mercer The other that seeing Ioseph was the eldest by his principall wife Iacob might shew how justly the birth-right was translated from Ruben to Ioseph and his sonnes Iun. QUEST IV. Why Iacob knew not Ephraim and Manasseh at the first and why Ioseph removeth them Vers. 12. ANd Ioseph tooke them away from his knees 1. Whereas Iacob before vers 8. asked who they were namely Manasseh and Ephraim it was not for that Iacob foreseeing that wicked Ieroboam should come of Ephraim and Iehu of Manasseh did therefore at the first take no knowledge of them but deferred his blessing as some Hebrewes imagine but the cause is shewed vers 10. because Iacobs eies were dim and he could not well see 2. Iacob caused them to be brought neere him that he might imbrace them they were not set upon the bed for they were some 22. or 23. yeares old being borne in the yeares of plenty some 4. or 5. yeares before Iacob came downe into Egypt who had beene there now 17. yeares 3. Ioseph tooke them not from his owne knees but from his fathers as the Latine text readeth though in the originall it be from his knees not his fathers knees that he might place them in order to receive their fathers blessing Mercer for Ioseph might perceive either by the naming of Ephraim before Manasseh or by Iacobs imbracing them that he more inclined to Ephraim before Manasseh and therefore with Iacobs leave removeth a little and presenteth them againe according to their age Iun. QUEST V. Of the translating of the birth-right from Manasseh to Ephraim what it signifieth Vers. 14. ISrael stretched out his right hand and laid it upon Ephraims head 1. Iacob feeling with his hands which was the elder and bigger for the words are he caused his hands to understand of purpose laid his right hand upon Ephraim in signe of preheminence Iun. for although among the Persians the left hand was the more honourable place as Xenophon reporteth of Cyrus that those whom he honoured most he placed at his left hand because it was most subject to danger yet the phrase and use of Scripture is otherwise as Salomon caused his mother to sit upon his right hand 1 King 2. And this is agreeable to nature to give the preheminence to the right hand which is quicker nimbler and readier for any worke Perer. 2. Iacob here transferreth the birthright from Manasseh to Ephraim as it was before conveyed from Esau to Iacob as the priesthood was translated from Abiathar to Zadock the regall dignitie from Saul to David so here there is a translation of the birthright 3. Which as it sheweth that God bestoweth his gifts without respect of persons so it might prefigure the calling of the Gentiles in stead of the Iewes who were as the eldest brother as the parable of the prodigall childe sheweth Luke 15. QUEST VI. The Angell that protected Iacob whether hee were Christ. Vers. 26. THe Angell 1. Although it â—ee somewhat too curious out of this place to prove the Trinitie because God is twice mentioned and the Angell in the third place 2. Yet I thinke rather with Calvin and Iunius that the Angell was Christ than with Mercerus that it was an Angell to whom Iacob ascribeth his deliverance as to Gods minister and that for these reasons 1. Because it is not unusuall in scripture to call Christ an Angell Malach. 1.1 2. The Angell which conducted the Israelites is called Iehovah Exod. 14.19 24. Saint Paul saith he was Christ 1 Cor. 10.4 9. 3. Because Christ was the Mediatour from the beginning of reconciliation and of all those covenants made betweene God and man Calvin 4. In this place this Angell is joyned in equall power of blessing with God and therefore hee cannot be any of the created Angels Iun. 3. Though Christ appeared in the forme and shape of an Angell yet hee tooke not upon him the nature of Angels but of man as the Angels appeared in the shape of men yet hee tooke not their nature Calvin QUEST VII The great increase of Ephraim and Manasseh Vers. 20. IN thee Israel shall blesse c. 1. Here Israel is taken not for the proper name of Iacob but for the name of the whole nation that came of him which hee saw by the spirit of prophecie should be given to his posteritie 2. In thee is not here taken casually as the Lord said to Abraham in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed for Christ of Abraham was the cause and author of this blessing But it is only a forme of blessing which should be taken up in Israel the Lord blesse thee as Ephraim and Manasseh as the like is used Ruth 4.11 The Lord make the wife that commeth into thy house like Rachel and Leah 3. And indeed Ephraim and Manasseh increased abundantly in Egypt even as the fish as Iacob blessed them for at the going forth of Israel out of Egypt there were of Manasseh 42700. of Ephraim 32500. and al these perishing in the wildernesse there were at their entring into Canaan of Ephraim 42500. of Manasseh 32200. Muscul. so that in the space of 215. yeares there sprang out of Ioseph 75200. QUEST VIII What portion of ground it was that Iacob giveth to Ioseph Vers. 22. I Have given unto thee one portion above thy brethren 1. This portion was Sechem which neither is to bee understood spiritually that as Iacob gave Ioseph that place where hee buried the Idols Genes 35.4 So Christ should possesse the Gentiles that worshipped Idols so Augustine qu. 167. in Genes 2. Neither was it the citie only of Sechem which Iacob here giveth as Chrysost. hom 67 in Genes For Iacobs sons kept their sheep in Sechem Gen. 37.12 and so also possessed the grounds and fields belonging to the citie 3. Neither did hee only give that plat of ground which hee bought for 100. peeces of money Gen. 33.19 as Hierom. tradition Hebraic For that seemed to be no great circuit bought
masculine gender better than to read it in the feminine as V.L.I.A.P. Vers. 18. When they came to Revel their father I.G.B. cum câ—ter not Iethro L. Vers. 22. Here the Latin and Septuagint make mention also of the birth of Eliezar transposing it out of the 18. chapter but no such thing is in the Hebrew Vers. 23. It came to passe after these dayes I.A.P.S. rather than in processe of time G. B. or when many dayes were past V. the sense rather than the words dayes are here put for yeeres for this was 4â— yeeres after 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of Amram Moses father Vers. 1. THere went a man of Levi. This was Amram the sonne of Kabath the sonne of Levi who lived 137. yeeres Exod. 6.20 he was borne as Eusebius writeth 14. yeeres before the death of Ioseph that is 55. yeeres after Iacobs going downe into Egypt who saith he begat Moses at 77. yeeres Perer. Moses yet maketh no mention of his parents names lest he should seeme to boast of his parentage Ferus 2. The Hebrewes have here a notable fiction that this Amram lived unto the time of Ahiah the Silomite who was in the dayes of Ieroboam that is above sixe hundred yeeres for from the going of Israel out of Egypt unto the fourth yeere of Salomons reigne are numbred 480. yeeres adde unto these 77. yeeres of Amrams age when he begat Moses and 80. yeeres the age of Moses at the returne of Israel out of Egypt so we shall have above 600. yeeres whereas the Scripture testifieth that he lived but 137. yeeres 3. But that which Ioseph reporteth is more probable that this Amram being a faithfull man praying unto God for his people had a vision wherein hee was bid to bee of good comfort and that the childe whose life was sought should be his sonne who should be preserved from the Egyptians rage and be the deliverer of his people Ioseph lib. 2. cap. 5. but seeing the Scripture maketh no mention we may bee at choise whether we will receive this report QUEST II. Why it is said he went and tooke NOw it is said he went not that he went to any other place or Citie for seeing his wife was of the same familie of Levi it is like that they did dwell not farre asunder 2. Neither it is understood of his returning to his wife from whom he had sequestred himselfe to fasting and prayer as Ferus for this text evidently speaketh of his first taking of her to wife 3. But hereby is shewed his advised purpose and determination in taking her to wife as also some notable thing insinuated to follow as it is said that Ruben went and lay with his fathers concubine Gen. 25. Simler QUEST III. Of Iacobed Moses mother whether she were aunt or cosine German to Amram TOoke to wife a daughter of Levi. This was Iocebed 1. who was not the daughter of Amrams uncle and so cosine Germane to Amram as the Septuagint Latine translator to whom consent Lyranus Montanus Cajetanus Pererius with others for though it should be granted that the Hebrew word Ded doth sometime signifie the uncles sonne as Ierem. 32.12 Hananâ—el is called Ieremies uncles sonne yet the word sonne may be supplied as before vers 8. he is called his uncles sonne yet seeing the Scripture evidently saith that Iocebed was borne unto Levi Numb 26.59 it is without controversie that she was Levies daughter sister to Rahath and Aunt to Amram being his fathers sister Exod. 6.20 2. But yet the Hebrewes are farre wide that would have Iocebed borne about that time that Iacob went downe into Egypt for then she should have beene about 135. yeeres old elder by fortie yeers than Sarah when she bore Isaack and if Moses birth had beene so miraculous the Scripture would not have concealed it ex Perer. And the Scripture beside saith that she was borne to Levi in Egypt Numb 26.59 3. Neither was this Iocebed another of the same name beside the daughter of Levi as some thinke seeing that the she is said to be Dodatho his that is Amrams Aunt Exod. 6.20 4. The sounder opinion then is that this Iocebed was the naturall and proper daughter of Levi the Scripture so testifying and of this opinion are Vatablus Paguine Iunius with the Chalde Paraphrast and Simlerus with others Thostatus conjectureth well that Levi might beget her at 100. as Abraham begat sonnes at 137. after Sarahs death who lived 127 yeeres being 10. yeeres younger than Abraham and Iacob at 107. begat Benjamin And it is not unlike but that Iocebed at 68. yeeres might beare Moses in those dayes women might continue child-bearing till then but howsoever this computation be counted yet it is evident out of Scripture that Iocebed was daughter unto Levi and therefore all disputation to the contrarie is needlesse QUEST IV. Why such mariages were tolerated in those daies NOw though afterward such mariages betweene the aunt and the nephew were forbidden by the Law directly Levit. 19. yet it need not seeme strange that then such mariages were in use even among the faithfull 1. Because as Thostatus saith it was ante legem datam before any law was published As Abraham married his brothers daughter Iacob married two sisters 2. The paucitie and the fewnesse of the righteous seed is to be considered and the confusion of those times which made those things to be tolerated Iun. Annot. 3. They had a desire to match in their owne kindred as Abraham Isaack and Iacob did and by that meanes they joyned often mariage in neere degrees of kindred Simlerus QUEST V. When Amram married his wife COncerning the time when this man of Levi tooke his wife though it be mentioned after Pharaohs cruell edict yet it was done before 1. Because Aaron was elder than Moses by three yeeres Exod. 7.7 and Miriam Moses sister elder than he for she was of discretion to watch what should become of the babe the conservation therefore of these children sheweth that this cruell edict tooke no place then 2. Neither is it likely that it continued long after Moses birth for if all the male children had beene cut off after Moses birth who was 80. yeeres old when Israel came out of Egypt then there should have beene few or none under that age that went out and although by some secret provision some infants might have escaped yet considering the strait and diligent search which was made as the Hebrewes thinke every three moneths such a multitude in all likelihood could not have beene preserved as went out of Egypt therefore it is not unprobable that Iosephus writeth that an Egyptian Priest told Pharaoh that about that time a child should be borne which should bee the ruine of him and his Kingdome and that Pharaoh thereupon did especially at that time give charge to destroy the infants to meet with that childe as Herod did cause to bee put to death all the children in
Bethlem and the coasts thereof from two yeere old and under Matth. 2.16 thinking also among the rest to surprise that holy babe 3. Now it may seeme strange that Amram would take a wife in this miserable time not being ignorant that they should beget children to be bondslaves but hee being a faithfull man and beleeving verily that the Lord would remember his people to bring them into the promised land doth therefore take the married estate upon him both for mutuall comfort in those heavie times and to increase the people of God Simler QUEST VI. Of the time of Moses birth compared with the times before and the times after Vers. 1. ANd the woman conceived and bare a sonne 1. Moses is borne the seventh from Abraham another Enoch who was the seventh from Adam Iud. 14. buried also of God another Noah who was saved also in the Arke and preached to the world 120. yeeres for so long Moses lived â— For the time of Moses birth First to compare it with the yeeres which went before and the notable accidents therein it was from the beginning of the world 2430. yeeres not 2370. onely as Pererius and from Noahs floud 714. from the birth of Abraham 425. after the going downe of Isaack into Egypt 135. and from the beginning of the Egyptian servitude 7. yeeres The truth of this computation may appeare by gathering the summes of yeeres together From the beginning of the world to the floud are yeeres 1656. Gen. 5. from thence to the birth of Abraham 352. not 292. as Pererius for hee reckoneth Abraham to be borne at the 70. yeere of Terah whereas hee was begotten 60. yeeres after at the 130. yeere of his father being 75. yeeres old when Terah died at 105. as it is evident by comparing Gen. 11.32 and 12.4 From the first promise made to Abraham to the giving of the Law in Mount Sinai S. Paul counteth 430. yeeres from the going downe of Isaack into Egypt untill the returne of Israel thence are 215. yeeres and Moses was borne 80. yeeres before their going out of Egypt 3. The time of Moses birth thus agreeth with the computation of the yeeres following Moses was borne 80. yeeres before the going of the Israelites out of Egypt Exod. 7.7 120. yeeres before their entrance into Canaan Deut. 34. before the reigne of David 517. yeeres before the building of Salomons Temple 560. yeeres for from the going out of the Israelites untill the fourth yeere of Salomon when the Temple was built are counted 480. yeeres 1 King 6.1 to which adde 80. yeeres of the life of Moses before the captivitie of Babylon 990. yeeres for from the building of Salomons Temple untill the captivitie are yeeres 430. which put unto the aforesaid summe 560. maketh 990. And before their returne out of the captivitie of Babylon which was 70. yeeres after 1060. yeeres before the comming of the Messias 1620. as Pererius but with others more truly not above 1500. Concent Pererius to justifie his computation maketh his account by the Greekes Olympiades Christ was borne in the last yeere of the 194. Olympiade that is from the beginning of the Olympiades 776. yeeres And the Olympiades begun about the 8. yeere of Ahaz King of Judah about 280. yeeres from the building of Salomons Temple But seeing the computation of yeeres unto the Messiah is expressed in Scripture there is no need to take any direction from forren Chronicles So then whereas before the summe of yeeres from the building of the Temple unto the captivitie meaning the last captivitie of all under Zedekiah was said to be 430. from this must be abated 20. yeeres from the third yeere of Iehoiakim when the first captivitie begun Dan. 1.1 and there the 70. yeeres captivitie tooke beginning so we have 480. yeeres unto this number must be added Daniels 70. weekes unto the death of the Messiah which make 490. yeeres and thirtie and odde yeeres must bee substracted the space betweene the birth and the death of the Messiah so we shall have about 940. yeeres from the building of the Temple to the birth of the Messiah unto which adde 560. yeeres from Moses birth to Salomons Temple so the whole summe of yeeres from Moses birth untill Christs will bee 1500. as it is said before 120. lesse than Pererius by his Olympiades accounteth 4. To compare Moses time with forren accidents Moses was borne before the beginning of the Olympiades 840. yeeres which began in the 8. yeere of Ahaz and after Ogyges floud 180. yeeres for Eusebius out of Iulius Africaâ—us sheweth that Ogyges floud was 1020. yeeres before the beginning of the Olympiades Moses birth was 430. yeeres before the Trojane warre which was 407. yeeres before the beginning of the Olympiades and Moses was borne before the building of Rome 865. yeeres for Rome was founded in the beginning of the 7. Olympiade that is the 25. yeere after they begun ex Perer. QUEST VII Of the antiquitie of Moses who is found to be the most ancient of all writers either sacred or prophane COncerning then the antiquitie of Moses it is evident that hee is the first and most ancient of all either sacred or prophane writers 1. The prophesie of Enoch mentioned in the Epistle of Iude is not from a more ancient writer than Moses which was either kept by certaine or undoubted tradition or else was framed by the Doctors of Iudah from the short speeches which Moses hath of Enoch The booke of the Lords warres Sihoâ—s victorie Numb 21. was after the Law and it was some rehearsall of the battels which the Lord fought for Israel made much about the time but being not now extant it is without compasse of this question 2. For prophane authors and writers Moses farre exceedeth them all as it may be thus shewed 1. The Greeke Chronicles have nothing more ancient than the times of Iâ—ichâ—â— and Phoroneus the first Kings of the Argives when Ogyges floud happened as witnesseth Dionys. Halicarness and Plato in Timao reporteth that Solon contending before the Egyptian Priests for the antiquitie of Greece goeth not beyond Phoroneus and Niobe About this time Ptolomeus Mendesius the Egyptian Chronicler writeth that Moses reigned among the Jewes but as is before shewed he could not be above 180. yeeres after Ogyges floud 2. From this floud unto the time of Cecrops the first Athenian King Athens lay desert almost two hundred yeeres and long after Cecrops were Deucalions floud Phaetons burning Cadmus that builded Thebes Esculapius Thesius Hercules so that Moses being before Cecrops is found to be farre more ancient than any of these 3. Moses is elder than Homer the most ancient Greeke writer as Iosephus sheweth lib. 1. cont Appion who was long after the Trojan warre Plinie thinketh 250. yeeres after Solinus 270. Cyrillus 160. Herodotus three hundred yeeres but it is certaine that heâ— was at the least one hundred yeeres after But Moses was borne 430. yeeres before the battell of Troy as