and smoke by day and the shining of flaming fire by night c. and a covering shall be for a shadow in the day for the heate c. Isai. 4.5.6 QUEST XX. How this cloud differed from other clouds THis piller of the cloud was much differing from all other cloudes 1. In respect of the substance it was cleere and lightsome not darke and thicke as other cloudes are 2. It was in figure and shape as a piller the nether part thereof descending unto the Tabernacle the upper part reaching aloft unto heaven whereas other cloudes descend not as low as the earth 3. It alwayes kept this figure and fashion of a piller whereas other cloudes doe alter and vary in shape and appearance 4. This cloud moved of it selfe whereas other cloudes are moved by the wind and of themselves have no motion this way or that way but only as they ascend and goe up in vapors but this cloud both ascended and descended 5. Other cloudes are made of naturall causes as of vapors and exhalations but this cloud was raised by the Lord beside the ordinarie course of nature 6. The effects were divers for other cloudes are apt to engender raine and drop downe moisture but this was not ordained for that end but to shew them the way in going before them 7. This cloud differed in motion from all other cloudes for they are carried all one way with the wind this sometime went forward when the camp removed sometime it came backe and stood upon the Tabernacle it went sometime to the right hand sometime to the left according as the journies of the people were appointed out 8. The motion of it was alwayes certaine it went before the campe as they were able to endure to follow whereas other cloudes are carried swiftly that they cannot bee followed 9. The situation of it was divers not carried aloft as other cloudes which can be no direction to leade a man in his journey but this cloud was of such equall distance as it did part out their way before them like as the starre that guided the Wise men appeared below in the aire to conduct them Matth. 2.10 Lastly whereas other cloudes are not durable but are soone dissipated and dissolved by the wind and weather this cloud remained firme and so continued for the space of 40. yeeres Ex Perer. QUEST XXI· When the cloud began first to appeare BUt concerning the time of the first and last appearing of this cloud it is not like as Hierome thinketh that it went not before them till they came unto the third station in Etham because mention is first made of it there 1. For they had need as well before of a guide to direct them the way as afterward and therefore it is like that they had this direction in their first setting forth out of Egypt 2. As it is in the Psalm He made his people to goe out like sheepe and led them in the wildernesse like a flocke Psal. 78.52 where the Prophet alludeth unto the fashion of those countries where the shepheard goeth before and the sheepe follow after as our Saviour saith in the parable Ioh. 10.27 So the Lord went before his people as a shepheard in the cloudy and fierie piller even when he brought them out of Egypt 3. The Prophet Esâ—y also alluding unto this cloud saith That upon every place of mount Sion and the assemblies thereof shall be a cloud Esay 4.5 So that hence it may be gathered that the Israelites in every place and in all their assemblies and campes had the presence of this cloud 4. Then like as the Wise men saw the starre that brought them to Christ in the beginning of their journey as they say Wee have seene his starre in the East and are come to worship him Matth. 2.2 they first saw the starre and then came forth so it may bee thought that the Israelites saw this cloud in their first setting forth 5. The people had need to have had all encouragement in their first going forth and to be animated in their journey and therefore it is like that the Lord did at the very first shew these comfortable signes of his presence QUEST XXII When the cloud and fiery piller ceased ANd as the cloud appeared not so late as Hierome supposeth so neither was it taken out of their sighâ— so soone as the Hebrewes imagine for they say that after Aarons death who died on the first day of the first moneth in the 40. yeere after their departure out of Egypt Numb 33.38 the piller of the cloud and of the fire were no more seene and their reason is because that after that time no more mention is made of them Contra. First this is no sufficient reason for neither is there mention made of them a good while before 2. The words of the text are against their opinion for it is said That the Lord tooke not away the piller of the cloud by day nor the piller of fire by night from before the people Vers. 22. So then as long as they had need of this direction the Lord failed them not 3. Seeing the use of these pillers was to leade them the way that they might goe by day and by night it is like so long as they were in the way and travelled in the wildernesse they had the presence of the cloud the same cause remaining the meanes are like to have beene still continued But from the mount Hor where Aaron died untill they came to the plaine of Moab in the borders of the land of Canaan there were many solitary desert and waste places thorow the which they passed for divers of their stations were yet behind as appeareth Numb 33. that they had after they came from Mount Hor eight severall stations therefore it may well bee gathered that as they had the direction of the cloud in their other stations so also in these Perer. 4. Then like as the starre left not the Wise men till it had brought them to the very house where the holy 〈◊〉 was Matth. 2. So we may judge that the cloud left not the Israelites till they came into the land of Canaan whither the Lord intended to bring them QUEST XXIII Of the foure great miracles which the Lord wrought for the people in the desert THis extraordinary leading of the people by the going before of the piller of the cloud and fire was one of the great miracles which the Lord wrought for his people in the desert for as foure things are chiefly necessary for those that travell strength and health of body foode rayment and a guide so the Lord in every one of these wrought wonderfully for them 1. Their feete did not swell for the 〈◊〉 of forty yeeres Deut. 8.4 And of all that great multitude there being not so few in all as 2000. thousand seeing the third part of this number even 600. thousand were fighting men above twenty yeere old there was not one feeble
their time of rest during this three dayes journey Perer. But when they removed from the wildernesse of Sinai they went three dayes together without any stay the Arke still going before them to find out a resting place Numb 10.13 till they came to Kibroth Hatavah which was their next mansion place Numb 33.16 The Lord still animating and strengthning his people to go forward Iunius The third manner of staying was when the cloud remained still upon the Tabernacle two or three dayes and then they pitched their tents and thus the cloud staied in 40. yeere not above 42. times for so many mansion or camping places they had as they are set downe Numb 33. 4. Now how to know when they were to pitch their tents Pererius conjectureth at it and giveth these three rules First if the cloud stayed about noone then they knew that it onely rested till they had refreshed themselves but if it staied in the afternoone before night that they journeyed no more that day they tooke it that then they were to stay there some while and so pitched their tents But if it made no stay till the evening they pitched no tents till the next morning and then if the cloud went not forward they then set up their tents These are onely Pererius conjectures and uncertaine And it otherwise may be gathered out of the Scripture that they did not pitch their tents till the cloud had staied two dayes at the least as we read Numb 9.20 When the cloud abode a few dayes in the Tabernacle they pitched their tents at the commandement of God and afterward vers 22. If the cloud tarried two dayes or a moneth or a yeere upon the Tabernacle the children of Israel pitched their tents It seemeth then by this that this was a rule unto them not to pitch their tents or settle their campe till after two dayes Beside they had Moses to give them direction also in this case when to encampe themselves who continually consulted with God 5. Now the manner of their removing was this when the cloud arose from the Tabernacle the Priests and Levites tooke up the Arke and carried it and when they went forward with the Arke Moses used this prayer Rise up O Lord and let thine enemies bee scattered and let them that hate thee flee before thee And when the Arke rested hee said Returne O Lord to the many thousands of Israel Numb 10.35 Hereunto the Prophet alludeth when hee saith The Lord shall arise and his enemies shall be scattered Perer. 6. This cloud began not onely now to appeare when they were come to their third mansion place in Etham as Hierome thinketh but straightway upon their setting forth from Ramesis though mention be made first of it here that proveth it not now first to have appeared as Moses is said first in this place to have taken Iosephs bones with him which was done notwithstanding at his first comming out of Egypt the Scripture observeth not alwayes the order of time in setting downe matters of historie but the coherence of the argument So neither did the cloud leave them at Aarons death as is the opinion of the Hebrewes for seven moneths after Aarons death who died in the fift moneth immediatly before Moses death when Iosuah was consecrated to succeed him mention is made of the piller of the cloud wherein the Lord appeared to Moses Deut. 31.15 See more of this quest 22. before 7. Gregorie maketh the appearing of the bright cloud by day a signe of Gods favour and mercie to his obedient people and the appearing of the terrible fire by night as a signe of his severitie and justice against the wicked and unbeleevers Gregor hom 21. in Evangel Ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the lawfull use of ceremonies Vers. 9. THis shall be as a signe unto thee upon thine hand c. As this place sheweth that there were then in the Church and so are still commendable ceremonies which the Lord hath instituted to be â—â—membrances of spirituall things as these were of their deliverance out of Egypt so their superstition is reproved that dwell in the externall ceremony not looking unto the spirituall sense Ferus as the Pharisies did which did weare their phylacteries and fringes yet forgot the law represented and signified by them 2. Doct. Christ the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament Vers. 21. IEhovah went before them He that is here called Iehovah is chap. 14.19 called the Angell of God which was none other but Jesus Christ Iun. the Prince and Captaine of his Church the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament according as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.9 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also is for ever 3. Doct. Christ sheweth us the way to the heavenly Canaan as the piller did direct the Israelites toward their Canaan Vers. 22. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of fire This piller divers wayes represented Christ 1. He is the piller and upholder of his Church 2. He leadeth us the way unto eternall life as he himselfe saith I am the way the truth and the life Ioh. 14. 3. Aperit nobis viam maris rubei id est gratiam baptismi sanguine suo rubentes He openeth to us the way of the red sea that is the grace of baptisme died red in his bloud Rupertus 4. Christ is both a fire and a cloud that is both God and man 5. In noctâ— veteris testamenti paucis lucebat c. He did shine but to a few in the night of the old Testament as this fierie cloud gave light by night Ferus 6. But the most lively signification is this that Christ is that covering cloud under whose shadow wee are defended from the heate and stormes of temptation as the Prophet sheweth Isai. 4.6 Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the theatricall Pagean of the Masse Vers. 9. THey shall be a signe unto thee upon thine head These externall signets upon the head and frontlets betweene the eyes instituted at the first to a good end to put them in minde alwayes of the law of God they afterward superstitiously abused onely glorying in the outward ostentation of them so in Poperie the right use of the Supper of the Lord is turned into theatricum quâ—ndam actum Missa into a theatricall shew of the Masse calling men à communione ad spectaculum from the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ to a gazing spectacle Simlerus 2. Conf. Against the adoration of reliques Vers. 19. MOses tooke the bones of Ioseph This maketh nothing for the adoration of the reliques of Saints which idolatrous use is still retained and practised in Poperie for Iosephs bones were carried to be buried they tooke up the bones of Saints and Martyrs after they have beene buried these were true bones they shew counters and ducks bones and such like trash for the bones of the Saints as hath beene found by
4. Iunius placeth it neare unto Jerusalem being the same Valley where Absolon reared his Pillar 2. Sam. 18.18 and hereunto the Septuagint agree which interpret in the Valley of Melchisedeck And it seemeth indeed not to be farre off from Salem which is Jerusalem where Melchisedeck was King because he met Abraham there with bread and wine 5. It was not at this time but afterward called the Kings Dale Vatab. not because the Kings used there to exercise and disport themselves Chald. neither was it so named of some King Calvin but rather it was called the Kings Dale for the excellency of it and therefore is thought to be the same which was called Vallis illustris the famous Valley Perer. QVEST. XVI Who Melchisedeck was Vers. 18 MElchisedeck c. 1. Origen and Dydimus thinke that Melchisedeck was an Angell but the text is contrary that maketh him King of Salem 2. Some thinke that this Melchisedeck was the Holy Ghost which opinion is defended by the Author of the questions of the old and new Testament cha 109. which goe under Augustines name but it is none of Augustines worke for he numbreth the Melchsedechians among the Heretikes here 's 34. and it is an erronious opinion 1. For this Melchisedeck is said to be a Priest to the most high God but every Priest is taken from among men Heb. 5.1 2. If the Holy Ghost was a Priest unto God he therein should be inferiour unto God and so not God for in the God-head there is equality 3. Neither did the Holy Ghost ever descend from heaven to be incarnate but onely the sonne of God Ioh. 3.13 4. And whereas the Apostle saith that Melchisedeck was without father or mother and without beginning of dayes or end of life Heb. 7.3 whence they would enforce that Melchesedeck was not a mortall man but of an immortall nature the Apostle hath there relation onely to the story in this place Melchisedeck is not set forth in story by his kindred his birth and death he had both father and mother was borne and died but there is no mention made of it and so Hierome expoundeth that word used by the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 genealogie is not expressed or mentioned 3. A third opinion there is that Melchisedeck was a King of Canaan and not of Abrahams line of which opinion were Irenaeus Eusebius Caesarion Apollinarius Eustathius as Hierome testifieth and among the new Writers Calvin Iunius Musculus Mercerus Pererius with others 1. Pererius urgeth that place Heb. 7.6 He whose kindred is not counted among them which proveth not that Melchisedeck simply was not of Abrahams kindred but that it was not so expressed in story 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Epiphanius saith so that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not rehearsed in genealogie here used by the Apostle is the same that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without kindred vers 3. 2. And seeing Canaan was under Gods curse and Sem had the chiefe blessing how it is like that one of Canaan should blesse Abraham of Sem. 3. And the Apostle concludeth that Melchisedeck was greater than Abraham because he blessed him but none of the Canaanites which were the cursed seed could be greater than Abraham the father of the faithfull of blessed Sem. 4. The fourth opinion of the rest most probable is that this Melchisedeck was Sem which opinion is strengthned with many arguments 1. Sem onely of all men living was greater than Abraham as Syracides saith Sem and Seth were in great honour among the children of men 49.16 though Arphaxad Selah and Heber yet lived yet Sem was the most honourable in respect of his yeares his knowledge who saw the old world his prerogative in Noahs blessing and whereas Abrahams predecessors were Idolaters none of Sems progenitors are noted that way therefore seeing Melchisedeck was greater than Abraham and none then living was greater than Sem he is most like to be the Melchisedeck 2. That was the place of Sems dwelling whence in time Iapheths sonnes should learne to dwell in the Tabernacle of God so reasoneth Midras but from Sion came forth the law and word from Jerusalem Isay 2.3 at Salem therefore were the tents of Sem. 3. Hierome alleageth this reason used by some that Melchisedeck brought forth bread and wine to Abraham for his repast seeing he owed this duty to his grand-childe Evagr. tom 4. 4. Melancthon thus argueth therefore God brought Abraham to Sem the father of his ancestors to joyne together a notable company of the Church 5. Some use this reason A Kingdome is more ancient than a tyranny but unlesse we make Sem to be Melchisedeck we cannot plainly prove that a King reigned before Nimrod treat of Melchis 6. Melchisedeck is interpreted a King of righteousnesse this Melchisedeck had the knowledge of the true justice and righteousnesse by faith in Christ but in all the Scripture shall we read of none called to the faith but men acquainted with Abrahams house with himselfe or Isaacks line or the children of the East the sonnes of Keturah in the booke of Iob. 7. That this Melchisedeck a King of Canaan should bee Sem agreeth to the prophesie Gen. 9.27 Let Canaan be his servant 8. Also in that he is called a Priest of the most high God This also agreeth to Sem who had that prerogative of Priest-hood not as some Hebrewes thinke by his birth-right for Iapheth was elder but by his fathers blessing Blessed be the God of Sem who was more like to be this great high Priest of Sems God than Sem himselfe 9. Melchisedeck was King of Salem which signifieth peace and indeed this Salem had a speciall prerogative of peace for when the foure Kings smote other parts of the Countrey of Canaan as is set forth in this chapter it is not like that Salem should have beene spared if the King thereof had beene a Canaanite if there had not beene great respect to the person of aged Melchisedeck or Sem. 10. Where Melchisedeck is set forth without father or mother beginning of life or end of dayes this also most fitly agreeth to Sem who was borne before the floud whose father Noah was now dead who lived 600. yeares so that no man living at that time could remember his birth or death or parents 11. Seeing also that Hebers language was preserved in Salem as may appeare by the interpretation of the name of Melchisedeck It is most probable that this King of Salem was of that line who together with the true faith retained that holy language 12. Lastly seeing Melchisedeck was a type of Christ Psal. 10. that came of Sem and no type or figure of Christ is expressed in Scripture but of Sems line none is more like to be this representer and foreshewer of Christs everlasting Priesthood than Sem himselfe then living It is most unlike that any Priest not of Sem should shadow forth the high Priest Christ of Sem and
poenitentiam That he which committed adulterie after publike penance should finally be denied the Communion In Hieromes time it seemeth that adulterie was punished by death who in a certaine epistle maketh mention of a young man qui adulterâ—i insimulatus ad mortem trahitur who being accused of adultery was led forth to death yet Augustine as is shewed before reasoneth against it but of all other Origen writeth most plainly Apud Christianos si adulterium fuerit admissum c. Among Christians if adulterie be committed it is not commanded that the adulterer or adulteresse bee punished with corporall death c. neither therefore was the law cruell then neither now doth the Gospell seeme to bee dissolute but in them both the benignitie of God appeareth yet by a divers dispensation then by the death of the bodie the people was rather purged from their sinnes than condemned but unto us sinne is purged not by corporall punishment but by repentance and it is to be seene unto lest our punishment be greater whose vengeance is laid up for the next world when as they were absolved from their sinne by the paying of the punishment as the Apostle saith how much more punishment is he worthy of that treadeth under foote the Sonne of God Two reasons Origen yeeldeth of this his opinion that there is now a mitigation of the rigour of Moses law because then it served as an expiation of their sinnes prefiguring the death of Christ as S. Paul applieth that sentence Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree which is generally delivered by Moses to the particular death of Christ Galat. 3.13 but now the expiation of sinne is by repentance and remission of sinnes in Christ. Againe now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospell even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now for God punisheth not twice for the same thing as Origen in the same place alleageth Yet although we contend that the capitall punishment of Moses law may now be dispensed with in some cases upon the reasons before alleaged this is not either to condemne those Common-wealths which doe reteine still and practise the severity of Moses law against adulterers who therein sinne not but as Ambrose saith of the Apostles that asked for fire to come downe upon the Samaritanes Nec discipuli peccant legem sequentes Yet did not the Disciples offend following the law neither to excuse those places where this sinne is too easily and lightly punished as Erasmus complaineth in his time Nunc adulterium lusus magnatum est Now adulterie is but a sport of great men Where adulterie is not capitally punished yet great severity otherwise should be used as it was decreed in the Elibâ—rin Councell that he which having a wife committed adulterie should be under penance five yeeres can 〈◊〉 He that did sinne that way after should not bee received to the peace of the Church till his dying 〈…〉 that did commit adulterie after penance should never be restored to the communion of the Chuâ—â—â— c. 7. These or such like severe constitutions this wanton and lascivious age hath need of that this overflowing sinne might be kept in with higher bankes than now it is So then I conclude this point with Cyprian who speaking of divers kindes of Ecclesiasticall censure used in divers places thus writeth Manente concordia vinculo actum suum disponit dirigit unusquisque Episcopus c. The bond of amity remaining still every Bishop so directeth and disposeth his owne act that he is thereof to give account unto God The like may bee said of Princes and Magistrates in their dominions and regiments that the difference in publike punishments all intending the glorie of God and the brideling of sinne is no cause to breake peace or breede jelousie betweene Christian states Now for the other part that Moses Judicials doe bind negatively that is where Moses Law inflicteth not death there Christian Magistrates are not to punish with death the reasons are these 1. Because then the regiment of the Gospell should exceed in terror the strictnesse and severitie of Moses Law 2. God is that one Lawgiver that saveth life and destroyeth Iam. 4.12 he gave life and he only hath right to take it away God hath created man in his image Gen. 9.6 which image is expressed in mans soule animating the bodie This image then is not to be defaced and dissolved but by warrant and direction from God therefore the equitie of the Judicials of Moses ought to be a rule either by generall direction or particular president to all Magistrates in what cases and for what sinnes they are to deprive the offendors of their life But here it will be objected that if this be so then all those Common-wealths are in error which punish theft by death which by Moses law is satisfied by making restitution Exod. 22.2 Ans. Even by Moses law some kinde of theft received a capitall punishment as if it were a violent theft as it was lawfull to kill a theefe breaking into the house Exodâ—s 22.2 or a wanton theft as David judged him worthy to dye that having many sheepe of his owne tooke by violence the onely sheepe which his poore neighbour had 2. Sam. 12.5 Likewise publike theft and sacrilege in Achan was punished by death Iosh. 7. But that simple theft when a man stealeth only to satisfie his hungrie soule or to supply his present necessitie should be proceeded against to the losse of life it seemeth hard And as I take it the lawes of this land have used a good consideration herein that such small felons should escape by their booke wherein to my understanding greater clemencie and favour in some Judges were more commendable who require an exactnesse of such simple clerkes unlesse they bee such as are worthy for other former evill demerits to be cut off as rotten members There is a saying in the law Favores sunt ampliandi Where favour is intended it should be the largest way extended It were also to be wished that a greater valuation were yet set than of the usuall rate in such small fellonies when a man is to bee judged for his life By Dioclesians law some kindes of theft are charged with restitution of foure fold by another authentike law the theefe is adjudged to bee beaten with clubbes By the Decrees Qui fecâ—rit furtum capitale c. Hee that committed any capitall theft as in breaking into an house in stealing a beast or some other thing of price if he were a Clergie man he was to be under penance seven yeeres if a lay man five if it were a small theft he was to make restitution and to doe penance one yeere By any of these or the like constitutions sufficient provision might be made against simple theft But it can no wayes be justified that such simple theft should bee more straightly
necessary that Pharaoh should not hearken unto Moses because the Lord had foretold so much who cannot be deceived But Pharaoh was not forced or compelled thereunto there is then an absolute or violent necessity which forceth and compelleth there is a conditionall and hypotheticall necessity when a thing is said to be necessary another thing presupposed so Pharaohs disobedience and obstinacy was the second way necessary upon the presupposall of Gods prescience but the first way it was not necessary the first necessity is coactive but the second is voluntary the other neither justifieth a man if he doe well being forced noâ— condemneth him if hee doe evill but the second hath place in both both the righteous have praise whose obedience in respect of Gods ordinance is necessary and infallible and the wicked are justly condemned who sinne willingly though Gods prescience considered in some sort also necessarily Borrh. 5. Places of controversie and confutation 1. Confut. Against those that impugne the deity of Christ. Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God Hence certaine Heretikes as Nestorius that did separate the humanity of Christ from his divine nature would confirme their heresie that the man Christ was God no otherwise than Moses is called God as Eliphandus a Bishop of Spaine who held that the man Christ was onely the Sonne of God by adoption Contra. 1. The name of God in Scripture is given unto men as Psal. 80. I said ye are Gods but that title is given them in respect of their office but it agreeth unto Christ by nature for here the Lord is said to have appointed Moses God not to have begotten him as Hilarie well noteth neither is he simply called God as Christ is but with an addition Pharaohs God 2. Not onely the name of Elohim God is given unto Christ but Iehovah which is a name not communicable unto any creature but peculiar unto God and if Christ were no otherwise God than Moses was it were Idolatry to worship him Simler 3. Hilarie also sheweth that Christ is said to be five wayes very God which agree unto none but him 1. in name he is simply called God as Iohn 1. The word was God and 1. Epist. Ioh. 5.20 speaking of Jesus Christ he saith the same is very God 2. By his nativity and generation and so he is called the Sonne of God 3. By nature hee is one with God I and the father are one 4. In power all power is given me in heaven and in earth Matth. 20. 5. By his owne profession he professed himselfe to be the Sonne of God and therefore the Jewes went about to kill him because he said that God was his Father Iohn 5.18 Hilar. lib. 7. de trinitat 2. Confut. Against transubstantiation Vers. 13. AArons rod devoured their rods The Papists would establish their transubstantiation by this place for as Aarons rod being turned into a serpent is still called a rod not because it was so now but for that it had beene so so the bread in the Eucharist after it is converted into the body of Christ is called bread still because it was so before Contra. 1. If they could shew Scripture to warrant the conversion of the bread into Christs body as here is an evident text for the turning of the rod into a serpent they should say somewhat but untill they can doe that their error can have no colour from hence 2. Beside Aarons rod is so called not only because it had beene a rod before but it was to returne to be a rod againe but they will not have the body of Christ returne againe to be bread Simler In the questions before handled the 27. and 28. concerning the power of Satan in counterfeiting the spirits of the dead one question of purpose there handled by Pererius touching the apparition of Samuel raised by the Pythonisse 1. Sam. 28. I of purpose there omitted reserving it for this place of confutation 3. Confut. That Samuel himselfe appeared not to Saul but the Devill in his likenesse 1. THe most of that side are of opinion that it was the very soule of Samuel not raised up by the witches enchantments but God interposing himselfe did prevent her superstitious invocations and sent Samuel to declare his judgements to Saul sic Thostatus Cajetanus Pererius and their reasons are these First because the Scripture saith it was Samuel 2. Hee saith as the Lord spake by my hand vers 17. which was true of Samuel not of the Devill in the likenesse of Samuel 3. Hee foretelleth what should happen unto Saul the next day which the Devill could not doe 4. In Ecclesiasticus it is written that Samuel after his sleepe told of the Kings death chap 46.20 Ferer Contr. 1. The Scripture speaketh according as the thing appeared not as it was as Pharaoh in his dreame is said to have seene kine come out of the river Gen. 4.1 2. which were but representations of kine 2. As the Devill tooke upon him Samuels person so he also counterfeiteth his speech it was not true out of the Devils mouth no more was it true Samuel such counterfeit speech became a counterfeit Samuel 3. The Devill might either by certaine conjectures perceiving in what distresse Saul was and that God had forsaken him gesse what the successe of the battell should be or rather God herein might force him to speake the truth as did the false Prophet Balaam Borrh. 4. The authority of the booke of Ecclesiasticus doth not presse us and Augustine doubteth also thereof affirming that it was not in Canone Hebraeorum The Hebrewes received it not into the Canon of Scripture lib. de cura pro mortuis chap. 18. 5. Neither is there the like reason of Gods preventing the witches enchantments and Balaams divinations for that God did to his further glorie to shew his power in making the false Prophet to be an instrument of the trueth but this had beene contrary to Gods owne law who forbiddeth that any should aske counsell of the dead Deut. 18. Borrh. 2. Some doe goe further and thinke that the Devill might have power also to bring up Samuels body as Satan transported Christs body to the top of the pinacle Contra. 1. There is not the like reason betweene the transporting of the bodies of the living and of the dead which are asleepe and at rest 2. Satan had no power over Christs body but hee yeelded himselfe to Satans temptation that hee might overcome him in his owne weapon and this was permitted unto Satan to doe for the glorie of God the comfort of his members the confusion and victory over Satan but if Satan should be suffered to take up the bodies of the Saints neither God should receive honour by it nor the Church profit and beside Satan thereby would strengthen his Kingdome of darkenesse Borrh. 3. Wherefore the sounder judgement is that it was not the spirit of Samuel but of Satan that appeared to Saul who can transforme himselfe into an Angel
therefore thinketh right that these gates were onely the places of entrance into the great streets which went thorow the camp for the host lay in such order as that they had wayes and streets betweene their tents as wee see now in cities and townes as Iosephus also describeth the situation and disposing of the camp 3. Now Moses stood in the gate or entrance not because the use was to give sentence and judgement in the gates Lyran. Borrh. Or because Moses would have the Levites to give the onset in the beginning of a street and so to go thorow as Tostat. ibid. But this was the reason Moses tabernacle or tent was without the camp and so upon that occasion Moses stood in the entrance of the camp going now to his owne tent Iun. QUEST LXVIII Whether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie Vers. 26. ANd all the sonnes of Levi. R. Salom. to whom consenteth Tostatus thinketh Quod nullus de Levitis aliquid peccaverit That none of the Levites sinned in this great transgression because it is said All the sonnes of Levi gathered themselves unto him and if the Levites had sinned â—s other tribes there had beene no more cause to advance them to the Priesthood than other tribes Contra. 1. If that generall particle all bee pressed then it would follow that the children and all came which could not be for they were not able to use swords the meaning then is not that all the Levites came but all which came were Levites Iun. Sa. Or all is taken for many as this speech is usually restrained in Scripture as all nations are said to have come and bought corne in Egypt Gen. 41. 2. The Levites were more of Gods favour and grace than of their desert separated and selected for the Priesthood yet it is evident that this tribe was freer from consenting to this idolatrie than other tribes and for this their courage and readinesse in Gods service they received a blessing 2. Some thinke that even these Levites which armed themselves against their brethren were not altogether immunes à reatu free from this sinne but while they did it for feare levius peccarunt their sin was the lesse and so the mercie of the Lord appeared so much the more not only in pardoning their sin sed gloriam suam eorum manu asserere dignatus est but he vouchsafed by their hand to maintaine his glory Calvin Simler But it is not like that God would use their ministerie in the punishing of others which were guiltie of the same punishment themselves and their owne conscience accusing them they would have had no such courage to revenge the Lords cause upon their brethren it had beene also verie offensive to the guiltie parties to be punished by them which had beene alike guiltie And Moses proclaiming who pertaineth to the Lord let him come to me did meane that they only should come who had beene faithfull unto God and had not consented to that sinne 3. Some Hebrewes doe help the matter thus that because they cannot avoid it but that some of the kindred of the Levites were guiltie of this transgression because they did not spare their owne sonnes vers 29. that because it was lawfull for any of the other tribes to take unto them the wives of Levites their husbands being dead those children which they had by them might be said to be the sons of Levi that is grand children on their mothers side But this shift is taken away because Deut. 33.9 it is said that the Levites knew not their owne father or mother or children therefore they must needs bee understood to be Levites not by marriage or in some removed degree of kindred unto them but the immediate fathers and sonnes of Levites 4. Therefore the best opinion is that all of the tribe of Levi were not free from this sin of idolatrie many of them kept themselves as it is like at home and consented not but that a great sort even of Levi offended it may thus appeare 1. Because both Aaron himselfe was a ring-leader who can by no meanes be excused from this sin Lyranus 2. It could not be avoided but that many of the Levites were drawne away by Aarons example Iun. 3. But yet it is more evident because they consecrated their hands upon their owne sonnes and brethren yea their fathers and mothers that divers of the tribe of Levi fell away with the rest Lyran. Iun. Tostatus here answereth that the name of brethren is taken largely Pro fratribus qui sunt de filiis Israel For their brethren which were of the children of Israel qu. 35. Contra. 1. If it be allowed that the name of brethren is sometime so taken what saith he to the other names of father mother sonne These must be taken for the names of kindred or else we shall never have any certaintie in Scripture when we should by these names understand naturall fathers mothers and children 2. The other words companion and neighbour shew that the first is a name of kindred the first word ach signifieth here a brother in affinitie the second râ—ah a companion and friend the third karob Vicinia ratione conjunctum him that was a neighbour in dwelling and vicinitie or neernesse of place Simlerus 5. It is evident then that some of the Levites were accessarie to this great impietie because they were punished among the rest So that R. Salomon is herein greatly deceived who thinketh that the Levites though they were blame-worthy in not resisting the idolaters yet were not idolaters themselves neither consensu mentis nec facto exteriori in consent of minde nor in any outward fact c. for the Levites had beene unjustly punished if they had beene innocent Nay R. Moses Egyptius goeth further saying that although the Israelites often are found to have committed idolatrie yet Levita nunquam idolatraverunt the Levites never committed idolatrie But the contrarie is evident by Aarons fall for hee apparantly was an idolater in his externall act in building an altar unto the golden Calfe and offering sacrifice before it Paulus Burgensis in his reply proceedeth yet further that when our blessed Saviour was put to death the Levites as they are distinguished from the Priests were not principeâ— in crimine illo pâ—ssimo principall agents in that wicked crime whereas it is evident that the Priests were the chiefe enemies that Christ had the Levites indeed are not named but seeing the high Priest with the other Priests which were of the tribe of Levi were the contrivers of Christs death then cannot that whole tribe be exempted from this villanous act which is the intendment of Burgensis a great favourer of that nation QUEST LXIX Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them Vers. 27. THus saith the Lord c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that it is not necessarie here to understand that Moses had any speciall commandement
the text saith I haue given you every tree c. For 1. it is evident out of the Scripture that divers kinds of trees were created in Paradise for beauty and ornament which bare no fruit for food as the Cedar and Firre tree Ezek. 31.8 The Cedâ—rs in the garden of God could not hide him no Firre tree was like his branches 2. This generall permission to eat of every tree concludeth not a necessity of fruit-bearing in every tree but a liberty to eat of all which were fit for food excepting only the tree of knowledge of good and evill Gen. 2.17 QVEST. XXXV Whether the flesh of beasts were eaten before the floud LIkewise we refuse the opinion of Beda that neither man nor beast did eat of any flesh but onely of the fruits of the earth before the floud neither doe wee allow the iudgement of Thomas Aquinas who thinketh that the beasts which are now devourers of flesh should have used that kind of food in the state of mans innocency 1. part quaest 96. artic 1. The latter opinion wee reiect because if man had not transgressed there should have beene no death in the world Rom. 5.12 Sinne entred into the world by one man and death by sinne if there should have beene no death in the world because no sin I see not how death should have entred upon other creatures especially this violent death by slaughter as the Apostle also saith Rom. 8.22 That every creature groaneth with us and travelleth in paine together to this present so that this bondage of paine and corruption which maketh man and beast groane together was laid upon them together Neither doe I see how Basils opinion can stand hom 11. in Gen. that man in his innocency though hee should not have used the beasts for food yet might haue slaine them to take knowledge of their inward parts and to helpe his experience that wayes or it should have beene lawfull unto him to kill them in hunting for his delight as Pererius thinketh lib. 4. in Gen. p. 663. for this slaughter and killing of beasts upon what occasion soever whether for food for knowledge or pleasure belongeth unto the bondage of corruption which by sin was brought into the world The other opinion seemeth probable especially because of these two places of Scripture first for that the beasts and fowles lived in the Arke not of flesh but of other food than usuall as Noah is bidden to take of all meat that was eaten Gen. 6.21 for there being only one couple of uncleane beasts and seven couple of cleane preserved in the arke out of these there could not be food of flesh sufficient for the rest and after the cattell went out of the Arke there was no other food for them all flesh being destroyed but onely by the fruits of the earth Secondly the first permission to eat flesh that we reade of was after the floud Gen. 9.3 Everything that moveth and liveth shall be meat for you as the greene herb But these objections may be easily answered To the first we answer 1. that the beasts which did devoure flesh did also feed of herbs and so Noah might provide for them according to their eating 2. Though they did use altogether to live of flesh yet I thinke that for that present time and some while after all beasts might returne to the first food appointed in the creation this being a second creation and renewing of the world so that upon this extraordinary occasion and urgent necessity it cannot be gathered what was the ordinary food of beasts before no more than it can bee inferred that because beasts of contrary natures as the lion and calfe beare and cowe woolfe and lambe leopard and kid did lye together Isay 11.6 that there was no enmity betweene them before To the second place our answer is that there that liberty is onely renewed as is the blessing to increase and multiply vers 1. and the prohibition of shedding mans bloud vers 5. at the hands of a mans brother will I require the life of man for before the floud the bloud of Abel was required at the hands of his brother Caine. Notwithstanding therefore these objections I thinke it more probable that both man and beast after the transgression before the floud did use indifferently both the fruits of the earth and the flesh of beasts for food the grounds of this opinion are these 1. That one beast did not raven upon another in the state of mans innocency two principall reasons may be given one because as yet no death was entred into the world the other for that man bearing perfect rule and dominion over the creatures did keepe them in order but after mans fall both these causes were taken away for not onely death entred upon man but the other creatures were brought into the same bondage and were killed for sacrifice as Abel offered of the fat of the sheep Gen. 4 3. if it were lawfull then to slay beasts why not to eat of their flesh And againe man having lost his soveraignty over the creatures they then began one to rage upon another as not standing now in the like awe and feare of man as before this cause is touched by the Prophet Habbac 1.14 Thou makest man as the fishes of the Sea and as the creeping things that have no rule over them that is which doe one consume and devoure another because they have no governour this rule the beasts fishes and fowles had shaken off immediately upon mans fall and not only after the floud 2. Seeing in the old world two great sinnes abounded carnall lust and concupiscence Gen. 6.2 and tyranny and oppression vers 4. there were gyants or tyrants in the earth and tyranny and oppression brought forth bloudshed for which cause the prohibition of shedding of mans bloud is so straightly forbidden after the floud that God will require it at the hands of every beast and of a mans brother Gen. 9.5 How is it like that they would abstaine from killing of beasts that spared not to spill the bloud of men or from eating of flesh which is more apt to provoke unto lust than the simple fruits of the earth 3. If the flesh of beasts was not eaten before the floud what then became of the increase of cattell how was not the earth over-run with them This reason was given why the Lord would not at once but by little and little destroy the Canaanites before the Israelites lest the beasts of the field should increase upon them Deut. 7.22 because they both helped to destroy the cruell beasts and did eat the uncleane as swine and such other both which by their multitudes otherwise might have beene an annoyance to the Israelites But greater feare was there of overspreading the earth with increase of beasts before the floud if no such provision had beene made to diminish their number 4. But that place most of all confirmeth our opinion
not evill that Adam in abstaining from that which was good might shew his humility to his Creator 2. In that God gave Adam so easie a precept to keep only to refraine to eat of one tree having liberty to use all the rest beside not like in hardnesse and difficulty to the commandement given to Abraham to sacrifice his only sonne herein the transgression and disobedience of Adam appeared to be the greater in transgressing a precept so easie to have beene obeyed This Augustine lib. 14. de civit dei c. 15. Thirdly we answer with Tertullian that this precept though in shew but easie and light yet containeth the very foundation of all precepts and of the whole morall law for therein was contained both his duty toward God in obeying his will and love toward themselves in escaping death which was threatned if they transgressed Tertul. lib. con Iud. So that in this precept Adam might have shewed both his love toward God in his obedience faith in beleeving it should so fall out unto him if he disobeyed as God said hope in expecting a further reward if he had kept the commandement The Hebrewes here are somewhat curious as R. Isaach that if they had tasted only of the fruit and not eaten it they had not transgressed but the commandements of God doe concerne the very thought R. Levi by eating understandeth the apprehension of things spirituall which is here forbidden but we take it rather litterally and historically that God giveth them so easie a precept to try their love and obedience Mercer QVEST. XXVI How a Law is not given to a righteous man BUt the Apostle saith The law is not given to a righteous man but unto the disobedient c. 1 Tim. 1.9 And Adam was now just and righteous and therefore he needed not a law for answer whereunto I say that the law in two respects is said not to be given to a just man 1. in respect of the negative precepts as to abstaine from murther theft adultery but in regard of the affirmative precepts to retaine them in obedience and doing of good workes so the just man had need of a law and so had Adam 2. A just man need not to feare the punishment of the law as S. Paul in another place saith of the Magistrate which is the speaking or living law he is not to be feared for good workes but for evill Rom. 13.4 And in this respect so long as Adam remained in his integrity and justice the punishment in the law concerned him not 3. And a righteous man rather of a voluntary disposition than by compulsion of law yeeldeth his obedience QVEST. XXVII Why God gave a precept to Adam fore-seeing before that he would transgresse it FOurthly A question will here bee moved why the Lord gave this precept to Adam which hee knew hee would not keepe for answer whereunto first wee say that God gave him a precept which was possible to be kept and Adam had power to keep it if he would it was then not Gods fault that gave him free will but his owne that abused that gift Secondly if it be replyed why God did not give him grace and stay him from transgression I answer that God could have given him such grace and to the Angels likewise that they should not have fallen but it was fit that God should leave the creatures to their free will and not hinder the course of nature which hee had made Thirdly though God foresaw mans transgression yet that was no reason to withhold the precept for then God should neither have made the Angels nor man because he saw that some of both should bee reprobates and by the same reason God should not have given his written word because many heretikes doe pervert it to their destruction Fourthly as God foresaw mans transgression so he knew how to turne it to good as in shewing mercy to sinners and in sending Christ to restore what man had lost so that notwithstanding Gods foresight of Adams transgression he was not to forbeare to charge Adam with this commandement in regard of the great good which God also did foresee should ensue QVEST. XXVIII What kind of death was threatned to Adam Vers. 17. IN the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death The first question here moved is what death God threatneth to Adam whether the death only of the body or soule or of both 1. We neither think that the spirituall death of the soule is here only signified whereby the soule is separated by sinne from God which was the opinion of Philo Iudeus lib. 2. de allegor Mosaicis and of Eucherim lib. 1. in Genes for wee see that the Lord himselfe threatned the death of the body to Adam Genes 2.19 Dust thou art and to dust thou shalt returne 2. Neither is the death of the body here onely implyâ—d as some have thought but the death of the soule by sinne also which bringeth forth the death of the body as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 5.13 Death went over all men for as much as all men have sinned There was first sinne in the soule before there followed death in the body 3. Neither doe we think that everlasting death is here excluded as Pererius seemeth to insinuate lib. 4. in Genes qu. 4. of this matter For the Apostle saith We were by nature the children of death as well as others Eph. 1.5 by Adams transgression we were the children of wrath hee therefore much more that made us so and if Adam had not by sinning made himselfe guilty of eternall death why was the promise of the Messiah presently upon his fall made unto him Gen. 1.15 whose office is to redeeme us from sinne and everlasting damnation 4. Wee therefore thinke with Augustine that by death here is understood whatsoever death either of the soule or body temporall or eternall lib. 1. de câ—vâ—â— dei c. 12. for Augustine maketh foure kinds of death the temporall death of the soule when it is for a time separated from God by sin the eternal death of the soule when it is separated from the body the temporall death of the body when it is separated from the soule the eternall death of the body in hell So Adam first died in soule by losing his innocency he died in body returning to dust he was subject also to everlasting death both of body and soule but from that he was redeemed by Christ. 5. Beside under the name of death are comprehended all other miseries calamities and sorrowes which are the forerunners of death so that we may fitly compare death to the center all other miseries as the circle or circumference about the center or as the Scripture resembleth it death is as the burning coale other sorrowes and miseries are as the sparkles that doe rise from the coale Iob 5.7 Man is borne to travaile as the sparkes flye upward QVEST. XXIX When Adam began to die SEcondly it is
inquired when this sentence began to take place that in what day soever Adam did eat of the tree he should dye the death 1. Some thinke that a day is not here to bee taken according to mans account of dayes but as it is before God with whom a thousand yeares are but as a day and so Adam died within a thousand yeares after so Iustinus dialog cum Triph. but this sense seemeth to bee strained 2. Neither doe we refer these words in what day soever to the first clause only thou shalt eat and not to the second thou shalt dye the death as though the meaning should not bee they should dye the same day wherein they did eat but at any time after for this seemeth also to be but a forced sense 3. But we rather allow Hieromes interpretation that Adam began in the same day to dye not actually but because then he became mortall and subject to death lib. tradit in Gen. so Symmachus readeth thou shalt bee mortall 4. And beside that then actualâ—y Adam entred into misery and sorrow labour hunger thirst which are the forerunners of death 5. Adde unto this also that in the same day death entred by sinne into the soule of Adam in the very same day of his transgression QVEST. XXX Whether God made death THirdly seeing that by Gods sentence death seased upon Adam the question is whether God made death and whether this corporall death be a punishment of sin We answer 1. that as death is a defect of nature beside the first intention of the Creator brought in by sinne into the world that God is not the â—uthor of it but it is so only the fruit and effect of sinne 2. But as death is a just punishment inflicted for sinne so it is of God who though hee first made not death yet now hee disposeth of it thereby shewing his justice upon mans transgression so that as Augustine saith speaking of the beginning of darkenesse Deus non fâ—â—â—t tenebras sâ—dâ—rdinavit God made not darknesse but ordered them so may it bee said of death 3. Eugubiâ—us objecteth that death is not properly a punishment of sinne because it remaineth in the faithfull and it is not taken away by Christ. in Cosmopeia To which we answer 1. That death also at the last shal be destroyed by Christ 1 Cor. 15.26 The last enemy that shal be destroied is death 2. That although the death of the body remaine yet in the members of Christ in them it is not now as a punishment but as a consequent of their corruptible nature because all flesh is now as grasse Isa. 40.6 and death now unto them is not a curse but turned to a blessing in Christ being both a cessation from labâ—ur and an entrance into rest Rev. 14.13 Blessed are they that dye in the Lord they rest from their labours and their workes follow them QVEST. XXXI Why it was not good for man to be alone Vers. 18. IT is not good for man to be alone 1. not as R. Sâ—l left if man would have beene alone hee might be thought to be chiefe Lord in earth as God was in heaven for if man had beene alone who should have so thought or spoken 2. Neither was it not good in respect of God who by his infinite power and wisdome could otherwayes have multiplyed and increased man but in respect of that order and course of generation which God appointed for other creatures 3. Neither is this so said as though no man could live without a woman as the Hebrewes have these sayings nothing is good but a woman â—e that hath not a wife is not a man for God hath given unto some a speciall gift which may supply this want 4. Neither is S. Paul contrary to Moses where he saith it is not good to touch a woman for he speaketh in respect of those present times of persecution wherein their wives might have beene a let unto them Mercer 5. But this is so said 1. in respect of mutuall society and comfort 2. in respect of the propagation of the world 3. especially for the generation and increase of the Church of God 4. but most of all it was meet that woman should bee joyned to man because of the promised seed of the woman of whom came our Saviour Christ after the flesh QVEST. XXXII Wherein woman was a meet helpe for him Vers. 18. LEt us make an helpe meet for him The word cenâ—gdâ— signifieth as one before him or against him But we neither allow the conceit of some Hebrewes as R. Sâ—lamon that the woman is said to be against man because she is contrary to him 2. Nor yet doe wee like of Tostatus conjecture because the male and female in respect of their naturall parts are contrary 3. Nor yet doe wee approve David Kimchi his collection that the woman is said to bee as before man that is as a servant to attend vpon him for shee is appointed to bee his fellow-helper not his servant neither is it like that if shee had beene ordained to any base use or service that she should have beene framed out of Adams side 4. Therefore shee is called a helpe like to man as Hierome readeth or according to him as the Septuagint or as before him as the Hebrew both because shee was made like unto man as well in proportion of body as in the qualities of the mind being created according to the image of God as also for that she was meet for man necessary for the procreation education of children and profitable for the disposing of houshold affaires 5. This maketh a manifest difference betweene woman which is alwayes before man cohabiting and conversing with him and other females which after their copulation forsake their males Luther QVEST. XXXIII When the woman was formed A Further doubt is moved by some at what time the woman was made where 1. wee reject the conceit of Cajetanus who making an allegory of this story of the framing of the woman out of Adams side is forced to affirme that God made man and woman together upon the sixth day and not the woman out of the man for thus the history of Moses is called into question and as well may the whole discourse of the creation of the world be allegorised as this narration of the making of woman And again it is contrary to the Apostle who saith that the woman was of the man 1 Cor. 11.9 2. We likewise refuse the opinion of Catharinus who thinketh the woman to have been made the seventh day for this also is contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 In six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth the sea and all that in them is 3. So then we hold that the woman was made of a rib out of Adams side as Moses setteth it downe neither made together with him out of the earth nor yet made so long after him upon the seventh day but she was formed upon the sixâ—h day
said of all the Patriarkes beside that they begat sonnes and daughters beside those which are expressed no such thing is mentioned of Noah that beside these three he begat sonnes and daughters and the Septuagint read Noah begat three sonnes c. insinuating in so reading their opinion that these were all their sonnes yet it is evident Genes 6.9 That these were all Noahs seed the words are these are the generation of Noah Noah begat three sonnes c. 3. I rather thinke not that either Noah deferred his marriage till hee was 500. yeeres old or that hee being married abstained from the company of his wife all that time but that God so disposed seeing he purposed to save Noah and all his sonnes from the floud that Noah did not so abound with posterity as his fathers before him lest they also should have followed the wickednesse of that age and so perish with the rest the Lord saw that there might bee sufficient for the replenishing of the world againe and it was more to Gods glory to increase the world afterward by so small a number QVEST. VII Wherein Noah was a comfort to his parents 7. Vers. 29. THis same shall comfort us concerning the workes and sorrow of our hands 1. Not because the course of sinne should be stopped and the grievous workes of sinners stayed by the destructions in the floud as Chrysostome 2. Or because Noah found out the use of the plow whereby the earth was tilled with more ease as R. Solomon 3. or for that the use of flesh was graunted to Noah after the floud as some thinke 4. Nor yet onely for that the seminary of the world was preserved in Noahs arke which otherwise should have perished 5. Nor yet onely because God renewed his covenant with Noah promising that the world should never be destroyed with waters againe 6. But the chiefe scope of this prophesie hath relation to Christ in whom we finde true rest to our soules and who hath delivered us from the curse Galath 3.10 who was prefigured in Noah and his baptisme wherein is exhibited the remission of sinnes shadowed forth in Noahs arke as the Apostle sheweth 1 Peter 3.22 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Originall sinne by propagation not imitation 1. vers 3. IN that Adam begat a sonne in the likenesse of his owne image which before is interpreted of originall corruption the heresie of the Pelagians is confuted who denied any such originall sinne or depravation of nature to be in infants by propagation from their parents but that it commeth onely by a corrupt imitation this was the heresie of the old Pelagians who affirmed Peccatum prima transgressionis in alios homines non propagations sed imitatione transisset that the sinne of the first transgression passeth unto other men not by propagation but imitation which heresie seemeth to have beene revived by Catherinus a Popish writer who denieth that the sinne of Adam is propagated or transfused to his posterity But the Scripture evidently overthroweth this assertion David confesseth hee was conceived in sinne Psal. 51.5 the Apostle saith That death went â—ver all in as much as all have sinned children then if they had not sinne should not die and here Seth is begotten in his fathers image 2. Doct. Originall sinne not a substance 2. THeir opinion is confuted that hold originall sinne to be a substance for like as the image of God wherein Adam was created was not the substance of the soule but the quality as the Apostle expoundeth which consist in holinesse and righteousnesse Ephes. 4.24 so the image of Adams corrupt nature consisteth in the contrary qualities of impurity and injustice 3. Doct. The state of originall sinne in soule 3. THe opinion of Papists is refuted who affirme that this originall corruption hath the seat and place in the flesh not in the soule for this image of corruption was in Adams soule and therefore the Apostle saith he renewed in the spirit of our mindes Ephes. 4 24. and put off the old man c. and put on the new which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him Coloss. 3.10 there the corrupt image of Adam succeeded where Gods image is decayed which was in the soule for there the place of knowledge is 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Henoch was no licentious liver at any time IN that vers 21. after the generation Henoch is said to walke with God and not before Procopius Gazeus thinketh that Henoch was before a wicked liver but after repented But the contrary is â—vident in that it pleased God with such extraordinarie favour to take Henoch out of the world that he saw no death that he was as a shining starre for vertue and holinesse in that age 2. Confut. Henoch died not WHereas vers 23. it is said all the dayes of Henoch were 365. Albâ—n Ezra with other Hebrewes thinke that Henoch died for if he were still alive these should not be all his dayes Cont. 1. The Scripture maketh mention onely of the yeares of his life upon earth his yeares with God are not to bee accounted among men as the Apostle saith of Christ who in the dayes of his flesh Heb. 5.7 he is now in his flesh in heaven but these are counted the dayes of his flesh when he walked in his flesh among men 2. The Apostle evidently witnesseth that Henoch was taken away that he should not see death Heb. 11.5 he therefore died not 3. Confut. Henoch not alive in his flesh BEcause it is said that God tooke away or translated Henoch the Popish writers doe imagine that Henoch is yet alive in his flesh in Paradise together with Elias Contra. seeing that Elias is said to bee taken up into heaven or that he went into heaven 2 King 2.11 where Henoch also walked with God we cannot beleeve that they entred heaven in their whole humanity but that prerogative was to be reserved for Christ seeing the Apostle saith that he hath prepared a now and living way into the holy place for us by his vaile that is his flesh Heb. 10.20 Christs flesh therefore must make a way into heaven before any mans flesh beside can enter 4. Confut. Henoch not in the terestriall Paradise BUt because they also affirme that Henoch liveth in his flesh not in heaven but in the terestriall Paradise and it is against the faith as some of them say to thinke otherwise the vanity of this opinion shall easily appeare 1. Because the Scripture saith that every thing was destroyed upon the face of the earth and onely eight persons were saved in the Arke therefore Henoch if he had beene upon the earth must have perished 2. The waters prevailed fifteene cubits over the highest mountaine Genes 7.20 therefore the earthly Paradise must needs also have beene ouerflowne and destroyed 3. If they answer that Paradise might be hemmed in with the water which might stand as a wall round about it
as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
the rest of his sonnes being yet unborne Ramban 3. Neither is this an imprecation but a prediction of that which was to come Theodoret Calvin 4. Canaan is accursed not Cham not for that Canaan first saw his fathers wickednesse Theodoret or because of Gods favour towards Cham in preserving him in the Arke as some Jewes thinke nor yet lest that if Cham had beene named his whole posterity should have beene under this curse whereas Canaan only standeth under it Perer. for the whole lineage of Cham stood accursed But Chams sonne is noted not the father both to shew the greatnesse of his sinne whereby the punishment was derived also to his posterity Calvin And to declare that Canaan following his fathers ungodly steps who was partaker with him deriding Noah Mercer was also worthy of the same malediction Ambrose ibid. As also Canaan is singled out from the rest of Chams sons by the spirit of prophesie whereby Noah foresaw the wickednes of that nation and now the time was come when the event was to answer the prophecy in expelling the Canâ—nites and making them servants to Sems posterity Calvin As also hereby we are given to understand as Gregory well noteth in that Cham sinning Canaan is cursed quod reproborum nequitia hic inultae proficiunt sed in posterum feriuntur that wicked mens sinnes goe a while unpunâ—shed but they are afterwards met withall QVEST. XX. How Canaan became a servant to his brethren SErvant of servants 1. That his condition should be most slavish and servile more vile than the lowest degree of servants which should be so much the more grievous because he is subjected to his brethren whereas to be a servant to strangers is more willingly borne as Iosephus brethren thought great scorne that their brother should be their Lord Muscul. 2. We see that as in Adam sinne brought forth death so in Caine it is the beginning of slavish servitude ecce fratrem eodem natum patre peccatum fecit servâ—m behold sinne maketh the brother borne of the same parent a servant Chrysost. A profitable service and subjection should otherwise have beene in the world as when men for order sake and their better preservation obey their mercifull and prudent rulers that governe them as fathers But the slavish life and service had the beginning in cursed Canaan such as their state is that are taken captives in battell who being saved alive servi fiebant a servando appellati became servants being so called because they were saved Augustine 3. Though this curse did not presently take place for the Cananites did hold the Israelites a while in subjection yet at the length Gods judgements which hee in his wisdome and secret counsell for reasons best knowne to himselfe suspendeth were executed to the full upon Canaans seed Calvin QVEST. XXI How children are punished for their parents sinnes BUt here a great question will be moved that seeing Canaan was accursed for his fathers sinne how it standeth with Gods justice to punish the children for the fathers transgression for the better resolving of this doubt these severall considerations are duly to be weighed 1. The judgements of God are of two sorts they are either executed in this life or in the next in this many times they which sinne escape unpunished and they which are innocent are temporally chastised but in the next world every man shall receive according to their workes 2. Gods judgements in this life are either in spirituall or temporall things in spirituall which properly concerne the soule none are punished for another as the Lord saith by his Prophet Ezechiel the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father nor the father of the sonne but the soule that sinneth shall dye But in temporall things as the losse of the commodities and pleasures of this world yea of life it selfe one may be punished for another 3. The judgements in temporall things are to be considered either as chasticements and medicines or as punishments in the first sense they may fall upon innocents as Daniel and Ezechiel went into captivity being not guilty of the peoples Idolatry but this was a medicine tending to their spirituall good But as they are punishments they are onely incident to those which have deserved them So then God in his infinite wisdome doth lay temporall chasticements upon some even for others sinnes 1. That thereby we should be admonished both to detest sinne in our selves and to disswade others from it seeing it enwrappeth many in the same judgement 2. God can recompence abundantly the losse of temporall things yea of life it selfe with spirituall and eternall blessings 3. Yet none are so pure and innocent but must confesse that howsoever they are free from some great offences yet for other sinnes they may justly deserve punishment 4. But this course to punish one for another is onely to bee left unto God Man must observe another rule to punish him onely that sinned as it is in the Law the father shall not be put to death for the sonne nor the sonne for the father Deut. 24.16 though in other punishments which tend not to the death or affliction of the body as in depriving of honours liberty goods it standeth with justice even among men to punish the children for the fathers and many for one as is seene in the case of treason yet this privilege in general to punnish one for another is peculiar to God because he is both the Soueraigne Lord over man and all he hath he only knoweth how to make such chasticements medicinall and how otherwise abundantly to recompense those that are afflicted which things are not in mans power who therefore in inflicting of punishment must respect every mans desert 5. Yet for the most part they which are punished for other mens sinnes are guilty of the same themselves and therefore the Lord saith he will visit the iniquitie of the fathers vpon the children to the third and fourth generation of them that hate me Exod. 20.5 Where is to be considered 1. That God alwayes thus punisheth not but rather by this threatning terrifieth than verifieth the same by his iudgements Theodoret. yet sometime the Lord thus judgeth the posterity of the wicked as Gregory well saith si nulla puniret quis Deum res humanas curare crederet sin cuncta puniret extremum judicium unde restaret if God should punish no sinnes who could thinke that God had any care of humane matters and if hee punished all no man would looke for the latter judgement 2. Herein the long sufferance of God appeareth that hee deferreth his judgement sometime to the third and fourth generation to see if in the meane time the wicked parents or their children may amend if they doe not then the Lord is said to visit their iniquities that is to remember them at the length which he had a great while left unpunished as the Prophet saith
it for a recompence for taking Sarah away as the Septuagint read and Chrysostome expoundeth 2. Or to buy Sarah and her maid vailes to hide their beauty that others be not intangled ex Perer. 3. Or that it was a gift of honour to shew that Sarah was both chaste and innocent Latine translat and the great Bible so also Rasi 2. It is not understood of this excuse or dissimulation which Sarah used as though the sense should be this that she might use this vaile or colour of the truth among her ownr for they could not bee deceived but among strangers she should plainly confesse her selfe to be Abrahams wife Lyranus Tâ—status for what needed Sarah to use any such excuse where she was knowne 3. Some doe referre it as well to Abraham as to the gift and to all that now hapned that they were signes of Sarahs chastity Mercer But the better interpretation is to apply it to Abraham that he should be the veile of her eyes 1. That no man knowing her to be Abrahams wife should looke upon her to desire her Aben Ezra Cajeâ—â—n 2. It also putteth Sara in minde of her subjection to Abraham whereof the veile is a signe 1 Cor. 11. â—0 3. Oleaster also further stretcheth it that Abraham was her veile that is her just excuse that she did this for his cause being by him perswaded but the former exposition is the better QUEST XIII How Sarah was reproved SHe was thus reproved 1. The 70. reade speake the truth that is that I am innocent and touched theâ— noâ— but this reading dissenteth from the originall 2. So doth the Latine remember thou art deprehended Lyppoman saith it should be read reprehensam reprehended not deprehensam deprehended 3. Iunius readeth all this is done that thou maist be learned 4. But the better reading is all this was that sheâ— might be reproved or in all this she reproved her selfe so that they seeme to be the words rather of the writer concerning Sarah than of Abimelech to Sarah QUEST XIV Whether Abimelech were smitten with any disease Vers. 17. GOd healed Abimelech c. for the Lord had shut up every wombe 1. Aben Ezra is not right that thinketh that Abimelech himselfe was stricken with no disease but that he is said so to be because his wife and maidens were punished for the text it selfe saith that God healed Abimelech and it is most like that God sent upon him some infirmity in his secrets whereby he was kept from comming neare to Sarah QUEST XV. What the shutting up of the wombe signifieth 2. THe shutting up of the wombe is not to bee understood as Pererius doth of the difficulty of bringing forth for then the children being ready for birth and staying longer than their time should have beene suffocated and the text saith the Lord had shut up every wombe but all were not great with childe at one instant Neither need we with Calvin because in so short a time Sarah being conceived with childe of Isaack and not yet delivered there could be no experience or triall of their sterility and barrennesse to say the history is transposed and was done before for Abraham till now had no occasion to sojourne in Gerar therefore the meaning is that the women were hindred from conception so signifieth the shutting up of the wombe as the opening of the wombe betokeneth aptnes to conceive as we reade Gen. 29.31 The Hebrewes affirme that not onely in the women but the men also all their pores and passages were stopped as well of the mouth to take meat as of other places that expell them and that the hens could not lay their egges but the text beareth it not 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Adultery a sinne punishable with death Vers. 3. THou art but dead c. God threatneth death to Abimelech conditionally if he did not restore Abrahams wife Iun. whereby we see that in the justice of God adulterie is a sinne to be punished by death as Iudas adjudged Thamar to the fire for whoredome Gen. 38.24 Where the law then is more gentle than to inflict the punishment of death upon adulterers they may thanke the lenity of the Magistrate which useth not that rigour which may well stand with justice 2. Doct. Ignorance excuseth not sinne Vers. 6. I Kept thee that thou shouldest not sinne against mee c. Abimelech then if hee had touched Sarai though he did not know her to be anothers wife had sinned ignorance then excuseth not sinne though it doe some what extenuate and qualifie it Muscul. as it is in the Gospell He that knew not his masters will and yet did commit many things worthy of stripes shall be beaten with few stripes Luk. 12.48 he that sinneth willingly shall receive more stripes and he that falleth of ignorance shall have some also 3. Doct. The whole family blessed because of the Master Vers. 7. THou shalt die the death and all thou hast as the sin of the Master of the house bringeth a judgement upon the whole familie so the Lord also sheweth mercy to the whole house for the masters sake Luk. 19.9 This day is salvation come into this house because he is become the sonne of Abraham 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. No perfect righteousnesse in this life Vers. 5. WIth an upright minde and innocent hands c. This place is no ground for their opinion that thinke a man in this life may attaine to perfect justice for Abimelech doth not absolutely cleare himselfe from all sinne but onely in this particular in this degree of sinne that he had not committed willingly any act of uncleannesse with Sarah Calvin as the Prophet David useth to plead for himselfe Psal. 7.3 If I have done this thing if there be any wickednesse in my hands c. he onely purgeth himselfe from the suspition of a particular fact 2. Confut. The Scripture sendeth us not to pray to the dead but to be holpen by the prayers of the living Vâ—â—s 7. HE is a Prophet and shall pray for thee c. Neither doth this place make for the invocation of Saints that are departed for God sendeth not Abimelech to Noah or any other departed to pray for him but to Abraham then living Calvin The living then may pray for the living which duty may be mutually performed in charity while one knoweth anothers necessities But for the living to pray to or for the dead which know not their wants and they are already certainly disposed of in an unchangeable state as the living are not it hath no warrant upon any precept or example of Scripture or any sound reason drawne from thence 3. Confut. Against the heresie of the Tritheists Vers. 13. WHen God caused me to wander out of my fathers house c. The word is â—lohim Gods in the plurall number which maketh some to understand the Angels Vatablus Calvin but God and not the Angels first called Abraham from his Country fathers house
rare using of allegories ought to teach such that they also should be verie sparing 2. Unlesse they could say of themselves as Paul did I think I have the spirit of God 1 Cor. 7.4 They cannot challenge the like liberty in expounding of scripture as S. Paul did therefore it may be said unto them as Christ said to his disciples you know not what spirit you are of Luk. 9.55 3. Perer. to this purpose useth a good reason It only belongeth to God which inspired the Scriptures perfectly to know all things that were to come and not only to know them but to dispose direct them as it pleaseth him wherefore he only can appoint that things formerly done veram totamque figuram gerant c. should beare a true and certaine type and figure of things afterward to bee done Man therefore that cannot dispose of things to come is not to make types and figures according to his owne device 5. Confut. Types are said to be that is to signifie the things whereof they are types ANd Saint Paul saith these are 2. testaments that is Sarah and Hagar signifie two testaments Galath 4.24 so the rocke is said to be Christ that is prefigured Christ 1 Cor. 10.3 This Pererius acknowledgeth and yet could not see that Christ c. after the same manner said This is my body that is a figure of my body as both Tertullian and Augustine expound although there is great difference I grant betweene the figure and representation in types and in sacraments for there is only a signification of spirituall things but in the Sacraments there is a lively and effectuall oblation of the things signified and shadowed forth yet in the phrase and manner of speaking in both there is no difference Beza 6. Places of morall observation 1. Moral Mothers should nurse their owne children Vers. 7. THat Sarah should have given sucke c. Ambrose well noteth hereupon that by Sarahs example mothers should learne to nurse their owne children they which of necessity for want of milke or weaknesse doe put forth their children to nurse are excused but of nicenesse to refuse this duty is worthy of blame The Prophet saying thou hast given mee hope at my mothers breasts Psal. 22.9 and the Apostle commending widowes that had nourished their children 1 Timoth. 5.10 sheweth that God hath laid this duty upon mothers which they that refuse are but halfe mothers which nourish the infant in their wombes but forsake it when it commeth into the world 2. the infants many times drawing the milke of bad women doe imitate their evill manners as we see in plants and young cattell that follow the nature of the ground that feedeth them and the dammes that suckle them 3. The purpose of nature is made frustrate when for this end God hath provided milke for the food of infants for God hath made nothing in vaine Calvin 4. By this meanes also the mothers affection is alienated from the childe whom shee cannot so well fancy as whom shee hath nursed and kissed at her breasts Perer. 2. Moral Our affections must be subject to Gods will Vers. 11. THis was very grievous to Abraham yet Abraham though his affection stood otherwise after the Lord had spoken unto him doth bridle his naturall affection and submitteth it to Gods pleasure Wee likewise must learne to confirme our desires to the Lords will And if commendable and naturall love such as Abrahams was must be overswayed by our duty toward God how much more unnaturall and unlawfull lust ought to be extinguished which are flat opposite and contrary to the will of God Calvin a man is to forsake and deny himselfe for Christ. Mark. 8.35 3. Moral The counsell of inferiours not to be despised Vers. 12. IN all that Sarah shall say unto thee heare her voice Abraham is bidden to give eare to the counsel of Sarah And we must learne not to despise the advice of inferiours when they speake the truth unto us and perswade us to that which is right as the Apostle saith set up them which are least esteemed in the Church 1 Corinth 6.4 Muscul. 4. Moral The truest love leaveth not a friend no not in the instant of death Vers. 16. I Will not see the death of the child Hagars heart would not serve her to see her child dye but this was but a compassionate and effeminate love give me such a friend and lover as will not forsake one in the greatest extremity and will stand by him in the agony of death when hee hath most need of comfort I condemne not the first if it proceed of tendernesse of affection rather than of nicenesse and want of duty but I preferre the other So the Lord said to Iacob moving him to goe downe into Aegypt Ioseph shall put his hand upon thine eyes Genes 4.6 4. This duty is the dearest and nearest all other performed to their friends to close their eyes when they were dead 5. Moral God heareth our prayers every where Vers. 17. GOd heard the voyce of the child c. God is every where ready to heare the complaints of the poore Ismael was heard in the wildernesse Daniel in the Lions denne the three children in the fiery furnace Ionas in the whales belly Therefore Saint Paul saith I will that men every where lift up pure hands c. 1 Timoth. 2.8 no place is then barred to our prayers Muscul. 6. Moral Old rancour must be left where true reconciliation is made Vers. 25. ANd Abraham rebuked Abimelech c. Abraham did well being now to make a firme and faithfull league with Abimelech to powre forth all the griefe of his heart at once not as the fashion of some is which make semblance sometimes of reconciliation and attonement and yet doe retaine rancour and seeds of malice in their heart as Ioab did that embraced Abner with one hand and strooke him to the heart with the other 7. Moral Inferiour officers often abuse the name and authority of their Lords and masters Vers. 26. I Know not who hath done this thing c. also thou toldest mee not c. Abraham is found to bee here in some fault that finding himselfe grieved and wronged by Abimelechs servants would complaine of it before the King but powreth it out upon this occasion Luther so many that hold themselves quiet a long time sometime in their heat will utter their stomack But the greatest fault of all was in Abimelechs servants who abusing their masters name authority do without his knowledge take away a well from Abraham Such is the officious disposition of many inferiour officers and Ministers under Princes and other great men that they will father their injurious dealings upon their authority that neither knew nor consented So Gehezi abused his Master Elisha 2 King 5.22 CHAP. XXII 1. The Method THis Chapter entreateth first of Abrahams purpose to sacrifice Isaack his sonne with other things adjoyning vers 1. to 20. secondly of Abrahams
laid up for him but unto them also which love his appearing 2 Tim. 4.8 where the same certainty of the reward is decreed the like assurance is not denied 4. Bellarmine answereth that hence it is evident that all beleevers are not sure of their justification seeing Abraham that had served God most faithfully before yet never till now was assured of his justification lib. 3. de justif cap. 11. resp ad ration 1. Contra. It followeth not Abraham was not alwayes assured therefore every beleever cannot be assured but it well followeth that as there was a time when Abraham had not such assurance so the faithfull at all times have not such perswasion and that we grant 2. It is untrue that Abraham had not this assurance till now when he offered up Isaack for the Apostle sheweth that then hee had this assurance when faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse Rom. 4.22 23. which was before he was circumcised Gen. 15.6 5. Bellarmine againe answereth that the Scripture commending the righteousnesse of Abraham and other Patriarks doth rather make us certaine and sure of their salvation than themselves ibid. Contra. No mans salvation can be better knowne to another than to himselfe for as the life of the body is more felt where that life is than of others that see the bodies to live so saith which is the life of the soule as the Scripture saith The just shall live by faith is better apprehended of those which have the possession of it than of such as onely behold it 2. Confut. The promises not merited by Abrahams obedience Vers. 16. BEcause thou hast done this thing c. From hence Pererius inferreth that Abraham Egregâ—â— illo facto meruisse Deserved by this worthy act that such promises were made unto him and that the Messiah should be borne of his stocke rather than of any other Contra. 1. The Apostle doth conclude the contrary that because faith was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse he was not justified by works Rom. 4.2 4. 2. These promises were made to Abraham before he had shewed any worthy worke even then when he was first called out of his Countrey Gen 12.2 they then proceeded from Gods mercy not of Abrahams desert or worthinesse 3. The Lord therefore crowneth Abrahams obedience with renewing his promises to shew us that they which are justified by faith ought to proceed and goe forward in good works whereby their faith is approved Muscul. 3. Confut. The assumption of the humane nature to the God-head in Christ not merited 4. BUt to say that Abraham merited that the Messiah should take flesh of his seed is not farre from blasphemy for then he should have merited more than Christ himselfe did as he was man seeing that the hypostaticall union of the humane nature with the God-head in one person was of grace not of merit as Augustine well resolveth Quod Christus est unigenitus aequalis patri non est gratia sed natura quod autem in unitatem personae unigeniti assumptus est homo gratia est non natura That Christ was the onely begotten Son equall to his Father it was not grace but nature but in that mans nature was taken to make one person with the onely begotten it was of grace and not by nature But now if the man Christ deserved not the assumption or taking of the humane nature to the God-head and yet Abraham merited that his seed should in the Messiah be united to the God-head it will follow that he merited more than Christ wherefore that is a sound and Catholike conclusion of Augustine Neque enim illam susceptionem hominis ulla merita praecesserunt sed ab illa susceptione merita ejus cuncta caeperunt before the taking of mans nature there was no merits at all but all Christs merits tooke beginning there 4. Confut. The Chalde Paraphrast corrupt Vers. 18. IN thy seed c. So readeth the Septuagint according to the originall in the singular number and this reading is approved by the Apostle Galath 3.16 Wherefore the Chalde Paraphrast is found here to be corrupt which readeth thus in the plurall number In thy sonnes shall all the people of the earth be blessed 5. Confut. Many in Scripture taken for all ALL the nations of the earth shall be blessed And Gen. 17.5 the Lord saith A father of many nations have I made thee we see then that in the phrase of Scripture sometimes many are taken for all by this place therefore that cavill of the Pelagians may be answered who because the Apostle saith By one mans disobedience many were made sinners Rom. 5.19 would inferre that we became sinners not by originall corruption or propagation of sinne but by imitation for then the Apostle would have said not many but all But the Apostle by many understandeth all as he affirmeth vers 18. That by the offence of one the fault came upon all to condemnation for they which are all may truly be said to bee many The like cavill in another question is urged by Catharinus a popish writer who because it is said in Daniel 12.2 That many of them which sleepe in the dust shall awake some to everlasting life some to shame collecteth that all shall not but that some as namely infants dying without baptisme shall neither be in heaven nor hell But this objection may receive the same answer that as in the promise made to Abraham many is taken for all so also is it in this place of the Prophet as before also is shewed the like use in the Apostle 6. Places of Exhortation 1. Observ. To beare the death of children patiently Vers. 10. ABraham stretching forth his hand tooke the knife c. Origen from this example of Abraham that doubted not to offer up his sonne perswadeth parents to beare patiently the death of their children Laetus offer filium Deo esto sacerdos anima filii tui Chearfully offer thy sonne unto God and be a Priest of his soule This is nothing saith he to Abrahams strength which bound his sonne himselfe and bent his sword Hom. 8. in Gen. 2. Observ. Confidence in Gods providence Vers. 14. IN the mount will the Lord provide c. We are taught with the like confidence when all other meanes faile to cast our care upon God as Abraham did for whom the Lord provided another sacrifice which he thought not upon in stead of his sonne Isaack Calvin Therefore it is said in the Psalm 68.20 To the Lord belong the issues of death he knoweth how to make a way for our deliverance though we at the first see it not 3. Observ. Gods voice must be obeyed Vers. 18. IN thy seed shall all the Nations of the earth be blessed because thou hast obeyed my voyce Whereupon Ambrose giveth this good note Et nos ergo audiamus vocem Dei nostri si volumus apud eum gratiam invenire Let us therefore heare and obey the voice of God if we
doe urge and induce another to speake the truth or doe or not doe any thing as Ahab adjured Michaias and charged him in the name of God to speake the truth 2 Chron. 18.15 or else it is used passively when we force another to take an oath as Abraham here maketh his servant to sweare The first kinde of adjuration is used two wayes 1. By way of deprecation and intreaty by the inferiour to the superiour as the devils doe impudently adjure Christ not to torment them Matth. 5.7 but it was by way of intreaty vers 10. 2. It is used by way of authority and command 1. Thus the Prince adjureth his subjects as Saul did the people that they should eat nothing till night 1 Sam. 14.24 2. Thus the Apostles charged and commanded the spirits to come out of men as Paul did Act. 16.18 By this kinde of adjuration which is with power and authority spirits may be adjured but by the other which is by intreaty and supplication to conjure them which is nothing else but to intreat them for their helpe as Magicians and sorcerers doe it is a great impiety and plaine idolatry 3. Yea by a power and authority given from God thus the senslesse creatures may be adjured and commanded as Iosua by the power of God commanded the Sunne to stand still and it obeyed Perer. The other kinde of adjuring which is by ministring an oath is to be used onely in grave and weighty causes either divine as Nehemiah tooke an oath of the people that they should not give their daughters in marriage to the heathen Nehem. 13.25 or in humane affaires 1. For the deciding of controversies and ending of strife Heb. 6.16 2. For the binding of one to the obedient or faithfull performance of his service As Abraham here taketh an oath of his servant so officers may lawfully be sworne for the upright execution of their office and subjects to be loyall and true to their Prince 3. For the establishing of a league or covenant as an oath was betweene Iacob and Laban Gen. 32.53 4. For the clearing of a suspition as the woman suspected of adultery was charged with an oath by the Priest Numb 5.21 5. For the satisfaction of our neighbour in a matter of trust Exod. 22.11 so by the law the debtor may be lawfully urged with an oath by his creditor 6. For the security of a mans life one may sweare to another as the Egyptian servant to the Amalekite required an oath of David for the safety of his life and estate Sweare unto me by God that thou wilt neither kill me nor deliver me into the hands of my master c. 1 Sam. 30.15 QUEST VI. Why Abraham refuseth to take a wife from the daughters of Canaan Vers. 3. THou shalt not take to my sonne of the daughters of Canaan c. The reasons why Abraham would not have his sonne Isaack be linked in mariage with the Canaanites are these 1. Because they came of cursed Cham Generis author maledictionis haereditatem transmisit in suos The author of their stocke for not honouring his father did bring a curse as an inheritance upon his posterity Ambr. lib de Abrah cap. 9. 2. Because the Canaanites were Idolaters and of corrupt manners Primum in conjugio religio quaratur Religion must first be sought in mariage Ambr. Againe Salomon was corrupted and perverted from his faith by his idolatrous wives for although Nachors stocke were not pure in religion having a smattering of imagery and idolatrous worship as Laban sought for his gods that were stolen from him Gen. 31.30 yet they had some knowledge and understanding of God as appeareth in this chapter vers 50. This thing is proceeded of the Lord c. And beside their manners were honest and commendable not like to the Canaanites as is evident by Rebecca her virginity and their humanity in entertaining of strangers Perer. 3. Another reason hereof was for that the Lord promised the Countrey to Abrahams posterity and to expell the Canaanites therefore Abraham as he refused to bury his dead among them so much lesse would mingle his seed in mariage with them Mercer QUEST VII Why Abraham sendeth not Isaack to chuse his owne wife Vers. 4. THou shalt goe 1. Though Abraham send his servant about this businesse of mariage yet it was not without Isaacks consent who knowing this servant to be the minister of his father will yeeldeth himselfe to his fathers choice 2. Isaack is not sent not to make a way unto a mystery as Rupertus thinketh to shadow forth Christ who not by himselfe went but by his Apostles sent to the Gentiles 3. And though Isaack afterward sent Iacob for the same end to chuse him a wife from his fathers kindred yet that case was not like to this for Isaack had two sonnes Abraham but one and besides Iacob fled from the wrath of his brother to save his life Perer. And further Isaack was but forty yeares old a youth â—n those dayes Iacob was about seventy seven yeares of age and so fitter to chuse for himselfe QUEST VIII In what sense Mesopotamia is called Abrahams Country seeing he was borne in Chaldea Vers. 4. GOe unto my Countrey and kindred This Countrey and place of Abrahams kindred is named to be Aram Naharaim that is Mesopotamia vers 10. where was the City of Nahor which was Charran Gen. 28.10 Now Charran in Mesopotamia is said to be Abrahams Countrey 1. Not that he was borne there as Ramban and Paulus Burgens thinke for the place of Abrahams birth was Ur of the Chaldees Gen. 11.28 2. Neither is it called his Country because as Tostatus thinketh he dwelled there a long time even 60. yeares till the death of his father which is a great errour for Abraham stayed not long in Charran Eucherius thinketh but one yeare Pererius not so much Mercerus some two years Iunius five yeares howsoever the time was not long for Abraham no doubt being called to goe into Canaan would make no long aboad by the way nor yet deferre to obey Gods commandement So then neither Pererius thinketh right that Terah lived 60. yeares in Charran after Abrahams departure for Abraham came not into Canaan till after his fathers death Act. 7.4 And Tostatus also is deceived that Abraham with Terah lived together 60. yeares in Charran for seeing Abraham was but 75. yeares old when he departed from Charran if he staied there 60. then was hee but 15 yeare old when he came first to Charran which cannot be for he was then married Gen. 11.30 But both these errors are builded upon a false ground that Abraham was the eldest sonne of Torah and borne in his 70. yeare whereas the truth is hee was the youngest and borne in the 130. yeare of his fathers age as hath beene before shewed in the questions upon the 11. chapter 3. Wherefore the solution is this that Abraham calleth all the region beyond Euphrates his
Isaack did for his mother who was not comforted over her death till he married Rebeccah Genes 24.67 Neither need it move any question whether this Keturah were of the daughters of Canaan for seeing Isaack of whom the promised seed should come was provided for Abraham for this second of-spring which he knew should not increase the people of God was not so carefull to decline marriage with Canaan Tostat. Mercer QUEST V. Of the names and countries of Abrahams sonnes by Keturah Vers. 2. WHich bare him Zimramâ— Iosephus thinketh that some of these inhabited the region Trâ—glodytis in Africa which cannot be because they were sent to inhabit the East countrie vers 6. as most of them had their seat in Arabia foelix as may appeare by the remainder of their names as Zimram gave the name to Zamram in the region of the Cinedocolpites in Arabia foelix of Iocksan was named the towne Camasa in Syria palmyrins Iun. ex Ptolom 5. Geograph Medan Midian of Medan tooke the name the towne Madiania in Arabia foelix Iun. and the country Madianaea on the south of Arabia Hieron of Midian the country Madianitis had the name in the borders of Arabia petraea Therefore Pererius is in an error which thinketh these two all one country and confuteth Hierome for distinguishing them in 25. Gen. numer 19. Of this Midian came the Midianites of whom was Balaam which gave that wicked counsell against Israel from hence Moses had his wife who is also called a Chusite or Aethiopisse for there were two countries called Chus or Aethiopia one eastward which was Arabia another the occidentall Aethiopia in Africa beyond Egypt Perer. These Madianites were also called Ismaelites Genes 37.25.28 Iud. 7.33 8.24 because they were in their dwelling dispersed and mingled among the Ismaelites being yet of a divers kindred and originall the one of Agar the other of Keturah Ishbak the founder of Laodicea Scabiosa in Suria of Shuah came the Saccai inhabiting the East part of Syria by Batanaea Iun. vers 3. Sheba There were three almost of this name one the son of Chus Gen. 10.7 a people inhabiting neere to Persia another Sheba of Iocktan of the posterity of Sem Gen. 10.38 who are thought to inhabit India the third is Sheba of Keturah in Arabia deserta Perer. Iun. Dedan There was another Dedan the son of Raamah son of Chus Gen. 10.7.1 These were two divers people as appeareth Ezech. 27.15.20 where two nations are rehearsed with their divers merchandise 2. Neither of these could inhabit so far as Aethiopia in Africa as Hierome supposeth for being so far remote they could have no traffike with Tyrus as the Prophet sheweth Ezech. 27.3 It is evident that the Dedaneans were not farre from the Idumeans Ier. 49.7 8. Perer. of this Dedan seemeth to take name Adada in Syria Palmirenâ— Iun. Vers. 4. The sonnes of Midian Ephah These two countries are joyned together by the Prophet The multitude of camels shall cover thee the dromedaries of Midian and Epha Isa. 60.6 and Hierome saith that these two are countries beyond Arabia which abound with Camels the whole province is called Saba Hier. liâ— 17. in Isaiam Hepher Of him Iosephus would have Africa so called which is not like seeing all these are said to dwell in the East countries and yet there is no great probability that it should be called Africa of Afer the son of the Lybian Hercules Perer. The rest of the posterity of Keturah either were no founders of severall nations or their seats are unknowne only this generall direction we have that they setled themselves towards the East in Arabia or Syria not farre off one from another QUEST VI. Of what goods Isaack was made heire and why Vers. 5. ABraham gave all his goods to Isaack 1. Abraham had no lands or possessions to give to Isaack for he possessed nothing but certaine wels of water and the grove which he planted in Beershebâ— Gen. 22. and the double cave which he bought of Ephron 2. They were therefore moveable goods as they are called which Abraham gave to Isaack as sheepe beeves silver gold maid servants men servants wherein Abrahams substance consisted Gen. 24.35 Abraham was greatly encreased in all these things 90. yeares before his death when Lot and he for their greatnesse were constrained to divide housholds Gen. 13. and such was Abrahams greatnesse that even kings as Abimelech desired his friendship Gen. 21. 3. Hee made Isaack heire of all this both because he was the sonne of Sarah his first and chiefe wife and because God had declared Isaack to be Abrahams heire Perer. QUEST VII The difference of lawfull and unlawfull copulations in Abrahams time Vers. 6. TO the sonnes of the concubines Wee see then in Abrahams time there was a difference betweene wives and concubines and that all copulations were not lawfull as Cicero noteth that in the beginning there was a time when men lived as beasts c. nemo legitimas viderat nuptias 〈◊〉 certos quispiam inspexerat liberos c. no man knew what lawfull marriage was nor did acknowledge his owne children Cicer. in prooem de invention Well might this brutish fashion be received among the heathen but in the church of God among the faithfull it was not so but even then when as yet no positive lawes were made to restraine unnaturall lusts and unlawfull conjunctions in marriage they were a law to themselves and made a great difference betweene honest marriage and unhonest lust 1. In Abrahams time it is evident that there was a distinction betweene a wife and a concubine Sarah was Abrahams wife Hagar his concubine hereof more shall be said in the next question 2. They made a difference betweene marriage with a free woman and a bond-woman as Hagar the bond-woman with her sonne was cast out 3. That age discerned betweene matrimoniall acts and adulterous Abimelech confesseth adulterie that is commixtion with another mans wife to be sin Gen. 20. 4. Another difference was made betweene marriage and fornication Gen. 34.32 Should he use our sister as a whore so the sonnes of Iacob answered their father 5. Betweene lawfull marriage and unlawfull copulation with the fathers concubine or sonnes wife as Ruben was accursed because he lay with Bilha his fathers concubine Gen. 35.22 and Iudas having committed the like fault with Thamar his daughter ignorantly would doe it no more Gen. 38.26 6. A great difference they made betweene voluntary commixtion and violent forcing therefore Simeon and Levi were incensed against the Sichemites because Sechem had forced their sister Gen. 34.2 Perer. QUEST VIII The difference betweene a wife and a concubine NOw whereas Keturah seemeth to be reckoned among Abrahams concubines yet was she indeed Abrahams wife as she is called Gen. 25. 1. Neither in that sense Abrahams concubine as Hagar was 1. There are foure principall differences betweene a wife and a concubine the wife was taken solemnly with
people of God had speciall prerogative in blessing as Isaack Iacob Moses c. Perer. 5. Esau doth not desire a peece onely of the blessing Isaack having made mention of two blessings vers 37. his preeminence over his brethren and abundance of wheat and wine the Hebrewes thinke that Esau yeelded the preeminence but desired the other to be given him neither doth he desire to be partaker with his brother in his blessing or to have some other blessing given him as Perer. But he coveteth the whole blessing both envying that his brother should be preferred before him Philo. and of a lightnesse of minde thinking that the blessing might be reversed Mercer QUEST XVIII Of Esaus teares that they found no repentance Vers. 38. ESau lift up his voice and wept c. 1. Whereas the Apostle Heb. 12. saith hereupon that Esau found no place of repentance though he sought it with teares it is not understood of Esaus repentance as Thom. Aquin. expoundeth which because it was rather for a temporall losse than for his sinnes tooke no place But the Apostle meaneth that Isaack repented not of that which he had done to Iacob notwithstanding Esaus teares in like sense the gifts of God are said to be without repentance Rom. 11.29 that is God doth not repent to change his decree sic Beza ex nostris Cajetan Perer. 2. Where the Apostle saith he was rejected he meaneth from the greater blessing which belonged to the birth-right and inheritance for Esau obtained of his father the smaller blessing 3. Esaus teares proceeded of envie toward his brother not of any true sorrow for he doth not acknowledge any fault in himselfe but layeth all the fault upon his brother vers 36. and beside he upon this hated his brother and purposed to kill him vers 41. which is not the fruit of true repentance and therefore it is no marvell that it was not accepted with God Calvin QUEST XIX Of the blessing which Isaack gave to Esau. Vers. 39. BEhold the fatnesse of the earth c. Isaack indueth Esau also with a temporall blessing but with some restraint 1. First here is omitted plenty of wheat and wine which was given before to Iacob whereby is signified that Esaus Countrey should not abound with such plenty as Iacobs Perer. 2. In Iacobs blessing it was added God give thee of the dew of heaven but here no mention is made of God so the meaning is that Iacobs posterity should depend upon God for these externall blessings so should not Esaus race Mercer 3. There is a spirituall blessing pronounced to Iacob they shall be blessed that blesse thee which is omitted here 4. Where the Prophet saith I hated Esau and made his mountaines waste Malach. 1.3 Idumea was a desart and barren Countrey in respect of Canaan yet in it selfe it was not void of some fatnesse and fruitfulnesse as here Isaack promiseth Calvin QUEST XX. Of Esaus subjection to Iacob and the casting off of his yoke Vers. 4. BY thy sword shalt thou live c. 1. That is both Esau should get his living by the sword Mercer and his posterity the Idumeans should bee a savage and cruell people Calvin 2. He should serve his brother which came to passe in their posterity seven hundred yeares after this prophecie in Davids time who subdued Edom and put garrisons there 2. Sam. 8.14 Ambrose noteth this for a benefit that Esau was made Iacobs servant Intemperanti prâ—fecit sobrium prudenti imprudentem statuit obedire He set the sober over the intemperate and appointed the foolish to serve the wise lib. 2. de Iacob c. 3. 3. Thou shalt get the mastery some translate when thou hast mourned and referre it to that heavy chance when the idolatrous King of Moab sacrificed the King of Edoms sonne and not long after the Edomites shaked off the yoke of the Israelites sic Iun in hunc locum which reading is better for the word here used eu hiphel signifieth to mourne or to be humbled as Psal. 55.2 I mourne in my prayer the Edomites after they had served Israel some foure hundred and fifteene years in the dayes of Ioram Iehosophats son they departed from Iuda and made them a King of their owne 2 King 8.20 and in this liberty they continued eight hundred yeares till the time of Hircanus who subdued them and made them to be circumcised But after this Herod the sonne of Antipater an Idumean obtained to be King of the Jewes so that in him also after a sort the Edomites got the mastery over Iudah Perer. QUEST XXIII Of Esaus purpose to kill Iacob Vers. 41. THe dayes of mourning for my father c. 1. That which joyned and reconciled Ismael and Isaack the death and buriall of Abraham doth encourage Esau to kill his brother Muscul. 2. Yet it was but a fained mourning which he would afford his father seeing he purposed to slay his brother Calvin 3. He would not doe it so long as his father lived lest he should accurse him and deprive him of all blessings so he refrained for feare not of conscience Mercer 4. He onely maketh mention of mourning for his father it should seeme that he little regarded his mother whom he ought equally to have reverenced Perer. QUEST XXIV How Rebeccah knew of Esau his bloudy purpose Vers. 42. IT was told Rebeckah 1. Though it be said that Esau thought in his minde to kill Iacob yet it is like that hee could not conceale or dissemble his murderous heart but uttered it in the hearing of his wives or some other by which meanes it is more like it came to Rebeckahs knowledge than by revelation as Augustine thinketh because the words are it was told or reported to Rebeckah Mercer 2. She called Iacob or sent for him who as the Hebrewes thinke had hid himselfe for feare of his brother 3. Esau his hatred was such that he could not be satisfied nor comforted but by the death of Iacob thinking then to recover his birth-right againe QUEST XXV Of Rebeccahs counsell given to Iacob to escape away Vers. 44. TArrie there a few dayes c. 1. Yet Iacob stayed twenty yeares a longer time than Rebeckah supposed of which long stay the frowardnesse of Laban was a cause some thinke because of these words it is said of Iacob when he had served seven yeares for Rachel they seemed unto him but a few dayes c. Gen. 29.20 yet not his mothers words but the love of Rachel made that time seeme so short Mercer 2. She thinketh that Iacobs absence and the continuance of time would allay Esaus implacable wrath some mens anger is soone kindled and as soone abated such Aristotle calleth Acrechiólous extreme chollericke men others doe keepe wrath long whom he nameth Picrochiólous of their bitter choller and such was Esau his anger 3. Rebeccah promiseth to send for Iacob which the Hebrewes thinke she performed in sending her nurse Deborah to him which died in Iacobs house after
whatsoever he hath decreed concerning any mans salvation shall stand Calvin For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance Rom. 11.29 Yet must not this doctrine make us secure to sinne presumptuously trusting to Gods election but as the Apostle saith We must worke out our salvation with feare and trembling lest we be circumvented of Sathan and prevented of that which we vainly hoped for Confut. Against the errour of the Novatians THis example of Ruben notwirhstanding his fall restored to his patriarchal dignity doth further confute that error of the Novatians who denied pardon to those which were fallen and refused to receive them into their society and congregation Calvin We see that our Saviour Christ when Perer had thrice denied him yet vouchsafed to receive him to mercy and to confirme him in his Apostleship 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Amendment of life delivereth from dangers Vers. 2. THou said Iacob put away the strange Gods c Iacob being in great danger doth purge and cleanse hâ—s houshold so the next way to finde deliverance and to obtaine ptotection from God is to amend our life and to renew our hearts and to turne every man from his evill wayes Perer. Heereupon Balaam gave that wicked counsell to put a stumbling blocke before the Israelites to cause them to sinne that they might run into Gods displeasure and be out of his protection 2. Observ. The people must shew themselves willing to be reformed Vers. 4. THey gave unto Iacob all the strange gods Herein appeareth the singular and prompt obedience of Iacobs houshold who are contented to put away their idols iewels and caterings wherein they had so much before delighted Mercer which â—eacheth that the people should shew themselves ready and willing to be reclaimed from their superstitions and corruptions of life as we read that the souldiers and people came unto Iohn and asked him Master what shall we doe Luk. 3. 3. Observ. God striketh feare into mens hearts Vers. 5. THe feare of God was upon the cities Thus God is able to command the affections of men and to smite them with feare where otherwise there is no apparent cause of feare as here the strong and populous cities of Canaan are afraid of Iacob So Rahab confessed to the spies the feare of you is fallen upon us Iosu. 2.9 Thus God is able to deliver his Church whereas no other meanes are at hand by terrifying the hearts of the enemies thereof 4. Observ. It is lawfull and commendable to mourne moderately for the dead Vers. 8. IAcob and his company made such lamentation for the departure of that godly matron Deborah that he called the place the â—ake of lamentation It is not then unlawfull to mourne for the dead nay it is an uncomly thing to shew drie cheekes in the funeralls of parents wives and children as some doe S. Paul forbiddeth not to mourne for the dead but not as they that have no hope 1. Thessal 4. Muscul. 5. Observ. Our â—oyes in this life are miâ—ed with sorrow Vers. 19. THus died Rachel Iacob doth not so much rejoyce for the birth of Benjamin as he hath occasion of griefe offered for the losse and death of deare Rachel thus the Lord seeth it to be good to temper our joy with sorrow and therein we see the mutable and changeable condition of this life which affordeth no perpetuall and constant joy Perer. And therefore amidst our joyes it is good to arme our selves against sorrow as Iob in the midst of his prosperous estate did looke for adversity saying The thing which I feared is now come upon me Iob 3.25 6. Observ. One affliction followeth after another WE see further that Iacobs life was a continuall warfare still one temptation followed in the necke of another 1. Dinah was ravished 2. Simeon and Levi put the city to the sword 3. Deborah dieth 4. Then Rachel his beloved wife 5. Then Ruben commiteth incest 6. Ioseph is sold into Egypt 7. Isaack dieth 8. Benjamin is also taken from him to goe into Egypt Thus many are the tentations and tribulations wherewith the Lord trieth his children Calvin We learne that while we live here we should prepare our selves for crosses and afflictions and when we are escaped one to looke presently for another This was Iobs case when one messenger followed at the heeles of another bringing him evill tidings Iob 1. 7. Observ. Godly women may die in childbirth Vers. 18. AS shee was about to yeeld up the ghost c. The Hebrewes note three women in Scripture that died in travaile Rachel the wife of Phinehes the sonne of Eli and Michol Davidâ— wife because it is said she had no children till the day of her death but this is a simple conjecture the meaning is that she had no children at all Mercer But we see by this example that even godly women may have Rachels lot to die in travaile and therefore such are not to hee discomforted if it please God that they so end their daies 8. Observ. Great blemishes sometime fall out in the Church of God Vers. 21. RVben lay with his fathers concubine c. It need not then seeme strange if such blemishes fall out sometime in the Church of God and families of Saints as Ruben here committeth incest in Iacobs house and it seemeth Bilha the mother of two tribes in Israel was consenting thereunto so among the Corinthians a young man had his fathers wife 1 Cor. 5.1 Mercer CHAP. XXXVI 1. The Method and Contents IN this chapter the externall state and happinesse of Esau is set forth first by his polygamie and marriage of many wives with the fruits thereof his children and the adjunctes thereunto his riches vers 1. to vers 8. Secondly by his genealogie where his children and nephewes are rehearsed and described 1. By their nativitie of what wives he had them vers 8. to 15. 2. By their dignity vers 15. to 20. Thirdly by the estate of his country where first the old inhabitants the Hâ—rites are described vers 20. to 32. then the new inhabitants the Edomites first governed by Kings vers 31. to 40. then by Dukes againe vers 40. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 2. Eliba Sebagon S. Aâ—libama Sibeon cat v. 5. Ieul Ieglom S. Iehus Iaalon cat v. 6. all the bodies of his house S. the soules of his house caet he went out of the land of Canaan S. into another country H. C. G. P. into a country away B. into the region of Seir T. from his brother Iacob H. from the face of his brother S. B.G.P. because of his brother C. before the comming of his brother T. from the face of his brother heb v. 8. Iacob dwelt in the land where his father dwelt in Canaan S. v. 11. Kâ—nez and Châ—ra H. Kenes cater v. 13. Zaresome S. Zerach Sammah cat v. 14. The sonnes of Libemas the daughter of Enam S. of Aâ—libamah the daughter of Ana caeter
v. 21. Leson Asar Risoâ— S. Dishon Ezer Dishan caeter v. 24. as she fed B. as he fed caeter this is that Ana that found Eanomin in the desart S. that found giants in the wildernesse C. hee waters H. that found mules T. B. G. P. ieenâ—m miles cat when he found the yoakes hupozugia of his father Sibeon S. when he fed his father Siâ—eons asses cater chamorim asses v. 32. Balac the sonne of Beor S. Bela the sonne of Beor cat v. 39. Arath the sonne of Barad regarded in his stead S. Adad H. G. Hadar cat the name of his citie Phogar S. Phaâ— C.H. Pan. G.B. Pahn T. P. sic heb the daughter of the goldsmith C. of Mezoab cater v. 40. Duke Gola S. Alâ—ba H. duke Alua. cater gnaluah v. 41. duke Olâ—â— S. duke Ela. caet v. 43. duke Mâ—bdiel cat H. Magdiel duke Zaphoim S. duke Hiron caet 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. The order of time of the things set downe in the chapter Vers. 1. NOw these are the generations of Esau. 1. These things which are declared in the chapters following from 35. to 41. are set downe out of their place as all going before the death of Isaack who saw his sonne Esau married and greatly encreased he knew of the incest of Iudah with Thamar and of Iosephs selling into Egypt Luther 2. For Esau was 120. yeares old when Isaack died at 180. therefore the history of this chapter was before Isaacks death Perer. 3. The selling of Ioseph into Egypt was 12. yeares before Isaacks death as is proved Quest. 21. of the former chapter who is thought to be delivered out of prison the same yeare that Isaack died thirteene yeare after he was sold by his brethren Mercer QUEST II. Of Adah Esaus wife Vers. 2. ADah the daughter of Elon 1. This Adah is not the same before called Iudith the daughter of Beeri Gen. 26.34 as some Hebrewes which they would have first so called because she professed God but afterward being given too much to the decking of her selfe she was called Adah of gnadi a iewel or ornament But this Adah is the other called Basemath which is there said to be the daughter of Elon the Hittite for it is no rare thing in Scripture for men and women to be called by divers names as Maacah the daughter of Absalom the mother of Abjah 1. King 15.2 is called Micajah of Vriel 2. Chron. 13.2 2. Concerning Aholibamah the second wife of Esau 1. these are neither other wives beside those which Esau maried before as Ramban thinketh who maketh Esau to have had 5. wives in all for the Scripture maketh mention but of three wives that Esau had and here it is therefore said not that hee tooke wives but his wives as having relation to those which were his wives before so that this Aholibamah is the same which is called Iudith before 2. Shee is said to be the daughter of Anah not the sonne as the Greeke and Latin readeth but daughter of Sibeon for the word is bath not ben neither is it meant that Anah was the daughter of Sibeon as some reade for Anah was Sibeons son vers 14. a man not a woman nor yet as the Hebrewes fable this Aholibamah is said to bee the daughter of Anah and of Sibeon two brothers as begotten in incest or of Sibeon the father of Anah But this is added by way of distinction because there were two called Anah one brother to Sibeon vers 20. another sonne of Sibeon vers 24. this Aholibamah was daughter to Anah sonne of Sibeon and so also is said to bee the daughter that is neice of Sibeon Iun. Mercer 3. And whereas her father is before called an Hittite but here an Hivite that is because the Hivites were the greater nation and comprehended also the Hittites Iun. or the one may be understood of the father the other of the grandfather Mercer 3. Basemath that is the same before called Mahalah Gen. 28.9 first so named because she was sickly of chalah to be sicke afterward Basemath of a pleasant smel Ramban others will have her so named for offring incense to idols Rasi but the derivations of names are uncertaine it appeareth that the daughter of Ismael whom Esau married was called by two names Iun. QUEST III. Whether this Eliphaz were one of Iobs friends Ves. 4. ADa bare unto Esau Eliphaz This is not like to be that Eliphaz which was Iobs friend though he might be of his posterity for these reasons 1. that Eliphaz is called a Temanâ—te but Teman was one of the sonnes of this Eliphaz who is not like to have taken denomination of his sonne Mercer 2. this Eliphaz could not be much lesse than 70. or 80. yeare old when Isaack died at 180. for Esau 60. yeares younger than Isaack married at 40. yeares then Eliphaz his first borne was not much more then 100. yeares younger than Isaack And by this it would follow that Iob that lived with Eliphaz should have beene many yeares before the departure of Israel out of Egypt which is uncertaine Muscul. QUEST IV. Why Aholibamah the second wife is last named Vers. 5. AHolibamah bare Leuâ—h c. Aholibamah is set after the other two wives whereas Esau married her before he took Ismaels daughter 1. Some thinke because she was the last of the three that bare him children but that is not like that she began to beare after 36. or 37. yeares having many children 2. It is more like that Aholibamah had children before which died and therefore they are not rehearsed 3. But the most like conjecture is that the other two are named first because they 〈◊〉 but each of them a sonne Aholibamah is named last because she had divers sonnes and therefore Moses was to insist longer in her generation or else seeing the Scripture doth often invert and change the order of time in history we need not much stand upon this point who are first or last named Mercer QUEST V. Corah how he is said to be the sonne of Esau by Aholibamah and the sonne of Eliphaz Vers. 5. WHereas Corah is named among the sonnes of Aholibamah vers 5. and yet is numbred also among the sonnes of Eliphaz of Adan vers 16. 1. neither for solution of this doubt need wee with the Hebrewes to imagine that Corah was the sonne of Eliphaz by Aholibamah Esaus wife who committed incest with her for then the Scripture would not before have set him downe as the sonne of Esau. 2. R. Levi thinketh that when Aholibamah was dead Eliphaz brought up Corah the youngest sonne of Aholibamah among his owne children and so he is reckoned with the rest of Eliphaz sonnes but in this case the Scripture would not have altered sometime making Corah the sonne of Esau sometime of Eliphaz 3. Therefore we thinke rather that there were two of this name one brother to Eliphaz by Aholibamah the other Eliphaz
Secondly Iacob putteth on sackcloth which was a ceremonie used in the East Countreyes to testifie their humility as Benhadads servants presented themselves before the King of Israel with sackcloth about their loines and ropes about their necks suing for pardon 1 King 20. Perer. QUEST XXVIII Who were those sonnes and daughters that comforted Iacob Vers. 35. THen all his sonnes and daughters rose up c. 1. These were not properly Iacobs daughters as the Hebrewes imagine that with every sonne Iacob had a daughter borne which they afterward married for such marriages the world being now multiplied were not in use among the faithfull Mercer 2. Neither could Iacobs sonnes the eldest not exceeding twenty foure or twenty five yeares not above seven yeares elder than Ioseph have daughters of that age able to comfort their father as Musculus thinketh they were therefore Iacobs sonnes wives that were his daughters in law 3. Neither did Iacob refuse to bee comforted because as the Hebrewes thinke where wee know certainly of the death of our friend we cease mourning but not where it is uncertaine whether they be dead or no for Iacob did perswade himselfe here that some wilde beast had devoured Ioseph but the greatnesse of his griefe would admit no consolation Mercer 4. We see the hard and cruell hearts of Iacobs sonnes that willingly did suffer their father to continue in this griefe and that with fained words they seemed to comfort him concealing the truth Luther 5. So it is added his father wept for him not Isaack who indeed was yet living as some thinke Aben Ezra Iun. But Iacob mourned for Ioseph his brethren mourned not but the father sorroweth for his sonne Muscul. QUEST XXIX Potiphar how he is said to be an Eunuch Vers. 36. TO Potiphar an Eunuch of Pharaohs 1. This Potiphar was not indeed an Eunuch or gelded man as the Septuag reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for he had a wife and a daughter married afterward to Ioseph 2. Neither for the same cause can that conceit of R. David have any likelihood that Potiphar was an Eunuch in part as retaining still the nerve or sinew though not the other instruments of generation 3. Neither is there any ground of that tradition of the Hebrewes that God caused Potiphars privie parts to wither and drie up because he thought to abuse faire Ioseph to his filthy lust 4. But whereas Eunuches were at the first used by Kings and Princes to wait upon their Queenes Esther 2.14 and so were as the Chamberlaines and neare unto their persons as Harbonah was to King Assuerus Esther 7.9 Hence the name of Eunuch was taken generally to signifie a Courtier Prince or great man toward the King as the word is used 2 King 8.6 The King commanded an Eunuch or one of his Princes to restore unto the Shunamite her lands and in this sense is Potiphar called an Eunuch that is one of Pharaos princes or courtiers as the word Saras signifieth sic Chal. Mercer Iun. with others QUEST XXX What officer Potiphar was to Pharao PHaraos chiefe Steward or master of the guard 1. For we neither reade with the Septuag Pharaos chiefe cooke although the word tabach be sometime used in that sense 1 Sam. 9.23 which reading Iosephus Philo and Ambrose follow 2. Neither yet was he Pharaos chiefe steward as some reade B.G. 3. Nor the chiefe captaine of his souldiers as both the Chalde and Hierome translate 4. But seeing the word tabach signifieth to kill and so the word is indifferently applyed both to Cookes and Butchers that are the slaughter men of beasts and to souldiers that kill men in battell and executioners that put men to death that are condemned by the law It appeareth that this Potiphar had the chiefe charge of those that were adjudged to imprisonment or death as Pharaos two officers his chiefe Baker and Butler were committed to his charge Gen. 40.3 and so may be well thought to be the chiefe Marshall or Captaine of the Guard unto Pharaoh Iunius Mercerus 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The father is as the Sunne and chiefe in the house Vers. 9. THe Sunne Moone and Stars did reverence unto me c. Ioseph by the Sunne and Moone understandeth his father and mother The father then of the house by Gods ordinance as the Sun from whom the wife as the Moone the children as Stars must receive their light and direction in every family Muscul. for the Apostle saith concerning wives If they will learne any thing let them aske of their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 and concerning the rest the same Apostle saith Having children under obedience with all honesty 1 Timoth. 3.4 2. Doct. The Prophets did not forsee all things but what was revealed unto them AGaine he dreamed c. Ioseph as Bernard well noteth did by the spirit of prophecie foresee his exaltation yet his humiliation and captivity was not declared unto him though this was nearer than the other tractat de gradib humilitat Whereby we see that the Prophets did not foresee all things neither had they a propheticall spirit residing with them whereby to foretell what they would but they onely knew those things which it pleased God to reveale unto them as the Prophet Ieremie at the first did not perceive the falshood of the Prophet Hananie that prophesied of their returne from captivity after two years but wished that it might fall out even so till the word of God came unto him Ier. 28.6.12 3. Doct. True obedience followeth not the words but the minde of the commander Vers. 7. IOseph went after his brethren and found them in Dothan c. Yet his father sent him onely to seeke them in Sechem vers 12. Ioseph sheweth his prompt obedience in not strictly tying himselfe to his fathers words but fulfilling his minde Iacob spake but of Sechem to Ioseph but he knowing that it was his meaning that hee should seeke out his brethren followeth after them to Dothan that hee might finde them out Muscul. by which example we are taught what kinde of obedience is most accepted with God not to keepe onely the letter of the law as the Scribes did whose corrupt glosses our Saviour confuteth Matth. 5. but to observe the true meaning and sense thereof 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. The Latine text corrupt and not justifiable Vers. 2. WHen Ioseph was seventeene yeares old The Latine text readeth most corruptly When Ioseph was sixteene yeare old which reading Perer. would justifie by these reasons 1. The Latine text understandeth sixteene yeares complete the Hebrewes seventeene yeares now but begun 2. He thinketh that the Latine translator set downe divers things whereof no reason can bee given not without the secret instinct of the spirit Pererius disput 1. in Gen. cap. 37. Contra. 1. It is the manner of the Hebrewes when they set downe a number of yeares to make the account by full and complete yeares as is manifest by the phrase here used He
Priest as the Hebrewes imagine for he died ten yeares before Iacob was borne who was now above 100. yeare old and therefore Melchisedeck could not have a daughter so young to beare children neither was this punishment arbitrary in Iudah and inflicted without law according to his pleasure Burgens for Iudah had no such authority there nor yet as Lyranus and Tostatus was she worthy of the fire because she had committed not simple fornication but adultery because she was by law obliged to the third brother and so in a manner espoused for it was not adultery for the widow of the brother to marrie with some other than the surviving brother else Naomi would never have advised her daughters in law to get them other husbands in their owne Countrey Ruth 1.9 But I rather thinke that Thamars adultery was in this that she had played the whore whereas Iudah had betrothed and espoused her to Selah and that Iudah who never was minded to give Selah to Thamar fearing lest he might die also as is evident vers 11. was very forward to take this occasion to be rid of Thamar that Selah might not marrie her 3. But herein appeareth Iudahs too much rigour and injustice that before the matter was examined gave sentence and was partiall the truth being knowne in his owne cause and further it was a savage part to put to death a woman great with childe which is contrary both to divine and humane lawes for it is written Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not bee put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but if Thamar had now died the infant had died with her The Romans had a law that the execution of a woman with childe should be deferred till she had brought forth the same also was practised among the Athenians Aeltan lib. 5. And therefore Claudius the Emperour is noted for his cruelty that spared not to put to death women with childe Perer. ex Dion lib. 57. QUEST XI Wherefore the Midwife useth a red threed and what colour it was of Vers. 28. THe midwife bound a red threed c. 1. It is so rather to be read than with Oleaster a twine or double threed the word sani here used commeth indeed of sanah that signifieth to double which is rather to be referred to the double die and colour than the double matter Iun. Tostatus also is much deceived here that taketh it not for a red but a blacke colour twice died ex Perer. 3. The Midwife tied this red threed as a marke of the first-borne because he first put forth his hand and the purple colour very well agreeth to the birth-right or eldership Muscul. QUEST XII Whence Pharez was so called and whereof he is a type Vers. 29. HOw hast thou broken thy breach upon thee 1. Hierome is deceived that of this word pharatz that signifieth to breake or divide thinketh the Pharises to have taken denomination whereas they had their name rather of Pharas which signifieth to disperse or separate because they were separate from other in profession of life and their apparell Mercer 2. This story hath bin diversly allegorized by the fathers some by Pharez understand the beleeving Gentiles by Zarah the Israelites and by the red threed their bloudy circumcision sacrifices sic Iren. Cyril Some contrariwise will have Phares to signifie the Jewes Zarah the beleeving Gentiles Chrysost. 3. But this Phares is more fitly a type and figure of Christ who hath broken downe the partition wall and hath broken the power of hell and death Mercer And by this strange and extraordinary birth the Lord would have Iudah and Thamar admonished of the sin which they had committed and to be humbled thereby though he in his mercie had forgiven it Calvin 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The difference betweene the apparelling of widowes and wives Vers. 14. SHe put her widowes garment off c. It seemeth that it was the use in those dayes for widowes to be knowne from wives by their mourning and grave apparell in which case more is permitted to women that are married whom the Apostle alloweth to adorne themselves with comely and sober apparell without pride or excesse 1 Timoth. 2.9 to please and content their husbands but widowes having no husbands to whose liking they should apparell themselves ought not to decke themselves to please other mens eyes Luther 2. Doct. Friendship ought alwayes to be joyned with pietie Vers. 20. IVdah sent a kid by the hand of his friend This Hâ—rah Iudahs friend did performe an evill office in being as it were a broker for Iudah who should neither have requested any dishonest or uncomely thing of his friend nor the other yeelded unto it love truth and piety ought not to be separated as Saint Iohn saith Whom I love in the truth Epist. 3.1 Muscul. 3. Doct. Adultery in former times punished by death Vers. 24. LEt her bee burnt We see that even among the Canaanites adultery was judged worthy of death for Iudah inventeth no new kinde of punishment but speaketh according to the law and custome of that Countrey So the Lord himselfe said to Abimelech that had taken Sarai unto him Behold thou art but a dead man for this c. Gen. 20.3 Now although this law as peculiar to that Countrey bindeth not now neither in respect of the kinde of death for by Moses law onely the Priests daughter if she played the whore was burned Levit. 21.9 the rest were stoned nor yet in the inequality of the law for the women offending were burned the men escaped as appeareth in Iudah Calvin whereas both adulterers and adulteresses are alike guilty and though then there was greater cause of keeping their seed uncorrupt for preserving of their lives and the distinction of families in which respect it may be thought somewhat of the former rigour and severity may be abated yet this example condemneth the security and connivence of magistrates in these dayes in the punishing of this sinne when as faults of lesse nature are more severely censured than adultery And whereas the president of our Saviour is urged by some for the mitigation of the punishment of adultery because he would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie it doth not serve their turne for this mercie Christ shewed not to cleare or exempt the adulteresse leaving her to the magistrate but partly to shew that he came not to be a judge in such causes as neither in other like businesses as dividing of the inheritance Luk. 12.14 partly by this example he would teach what is to be required in the person of an accuser not to bee guilty of that crime whereof he accuseth others 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That it is not lawfull upon any occasion to marrie the brothers wife Vers. 8. GOe into thy brothers wife Because in this place as also Deut. 25.5 it is permitted to naturall brethren to marry the wives of their brother deceased Bellarmine
of the time as they imagine as though marriage were a pollution either of time place or person 6. Places of exhortation and morall use 1. Morall To cleanse our selves when we come before God Vers. 14. HE changed his raiment and came to Pharaoh As Ioseph changed his outward raiment and put off his filthy clothes when he came into the Kings presence so ought wee to cleanse our hearts and sanctifie our soules when we appeare before the Lord Muscul. as the Preachet saith Take heed to thy foot when thou entrest into the house of God Eccles. 4.17 2. Morall Not to glory in our gifts but to referre all to the praise of God Vers. 16. WIthout me God shall answer Ioseph doth extenuate his owne gifts detracteth from himselfe and giveth the glory to God so wee should not rejoyce in any thing that is in us but acknowledge every good gift to be from God for as the Apostle saith Neither he that planteth nor he that watereth is any thing but God that giveth increase 1 Cor. 3.7 3. Morall Gods speciall care in providing for his Church Vers. 16. GOd shall answer for the wealth of Pharaoh Though God had great mercy upon Pharaoh and all Egypt in forewarning them of the great famine to come that they might aforehand make provision for it yet Gods speciall care and providence watched over his Church in Iacobs house that they might be preserved as Ioseph himselfe acknowledgeth God sent me before you to preserve your posterity in this land Gen. 45.7 4. Morall Wisdome not to be despised though cloathed in rags Vers. 15. I Have heard say of thee thou canst interpret c. Though the Butler before making mention of Ioseph for feare rather than of love lest by others it might have beene made knowne to Pharaoh how Ioseph had expounded his dreame in prison did in tearmes disgrace him saying he was a young man a childe in a manner an Hebrew who were an abomination to the Egyptians and a servant or bondslave vers 12. yet Pharaoh disdaineth not to take counsell of him we should not then despise wisedome though cloathed with rags not contemne the graces of Gods spirit in poore and base men to the world Mercer Muscul. Thus saith the Prophet There was found a poore and wise man and he delivered the City by his wisdome Eccles. 9.15 5. Morall Famine is unsatiable Vers. 10. THe leane kine did eat up the seven fat kine c. and it could not be knowne that they had eaten them When God sendeth the judgement of famine there is not onely an outward want but there is also a greedy appetite within that cannot be satisfied and that which is eaten is not seene in the body as these seven leane kine were never the fuller nor fatter though they had swallowed up the seven fat and well liking kine so the Prophet saith He shall snatch at the right hand and be hungry and eat at the left hand and not be satisfied Isay 9.20 This judgement God sendeth upon men for abusing of plentie and he which eateth and drinketh of wantonnesse more than sufficeth is justly punished with a greedie and doggish appetite that never can have enough 6. Morall Men of gifts must be called to publike office Vers. 38. CAn we finde such a man as this in whom is the spirit of God Pharaoh thinketh Ioseph a fit man for government because he was indued with the graces of the Spirit So none should bee called to place of rule and oversight in Church or Common-wealth but such as are thereunto fitted and furnished with convenient and sufficient gifts as Numb 11.17 those Elders which were chosen to beare part of the burden with Moses received also part of his spirit 7. Morall The Kings office to provide for the want of his people Vers. 55. THe people cried to Pharaoh and he said goe to Ioseph Although the people knew that the King had deputed Ioseph the chiefe officer for corne yet they make their complaint to the King It then belongeth to the King to provide for the necessities of the people and to see that his officers doe their duty so the woman in time of famine cried to the King Helpe my Lord O King 1 King 6.27 CHAP. XLII 1. The Method or Argument of the Chapter IN this chapter first is set downe the comming of Israels sonnes into Egypt wherefore they came to buy food vers 1 2. which of them came all but Benjamin and why left he should die by the way vers 4. Secondly the manner of their entertainment in Egypt is described from vers 7. to v. 26. 1. Ioseph dealeth roughly with them in charging them to be spies vers 7. to 16. then in detaining Simeon and binding him before their eies till such time as they brought Benjamin vers 20. to 24. other interlocutory speeches are inserted of the Patriarkes among themselves in confessing their sinne toward their brother vers 21. 2. Ioseph sheweth this kindnesse to his brethren in causing their money to bee put in their sacks mouth vers 25. Thirdly their returne home is expressed 1. What happened in the way as they went that in opening of their sacks they found their money 2. The report and narration to Iacob of their manner of handling and entertainement in Egypt 3. The refusall of Iacob to send his sonne Benjamin with them although Ruben earnestly perswaded him 2. The divers readings v. 1. Why are yeâ— negligent or sloathfull H.S.C. why gaze yee or looke ye one upon another B.G.T.P. heb v. 2. Buy us necessaries from thence H. buy us food S.G. corne B. buy us from thence T.C.P. heb v. 4. 36. Lest he take hurt by the way H. be sicke by the way S. die in the journey C.G. lest destruction befall him B. T. P. asâ—n destruction death v. 7. He considered what he should say unto them C. he made himselfe strange unto them caeâ—er v. 9. Ye are come to consider the passages of the land S. to see the weakenesse or nakednesse caeter v. 11. We are peaceable men and intend no evill H. we are peaceable and no spies S. we meane truly and are no spies B. G. we are true or honest men and no spies C.T.P. heb cun right true v. 16. By the health of Pharaoh H.S. by the life of Pharaoh C.B. G. so may Pharaoh live T. P. heb Yee shall be carried away S. ye shall be in bonds caet v. 19. Carry the corne which ye have bought for your houses H. carrie the corne which ye have bought S. carrie the corne which faileth in your houses C. carry corne for the famine of your houses G. to put away the famine of your houses B. P. carry corne the famine whereof is in your houses T. carry corne of the famine of your houses· heb v. 25. To fill their sacks with corne H.B.G. to fill their vessels or instruments with corne C. T.P. calah a vessell v. 30. Put us
experience of the mercies shewed to his father Isaack who also was not many yeares before departed about the 30 yeare of Iosephs age when Iacob was 120. Mercer 3. Where God is said to goe downe with Iacob into Egypt it is to be understood by the effect because God was present with him in protecting and defending him for otherwise the God-head neither ascendeth nor descendeth filling heaven and earth Mercer QUEST IV. The divers causes why Iacob feared to goe downe into Egypt removed Vers. 3. FEare not to goe downe into Egypt c. There were divers causes why Iacob feared to goe downe to Egypt which causes of his feare are here removed by the Lord. 1. He might be somewhat doubtfull because sometime in the like necessity of famine Isaack was forbidden to goe downe to Egypt Genes 26.2 Mercer therefore to helpe this the same God that charged his father not to goe downe biddeth Iacob not to feare to goe downe 2. He might feare lest his children might be corrupted by the superstition of the idolaters and about this time as Augustine thinketh began that grosse idolatry of the Aegyptians in worshiping Apis a king of the Argives that died in Egypt calling him by the name of Serapis which is compounded of the name Apis and Suros the coffin wherein Apis was entombed and in memoriall of this Apis they worshipped a pide Bull which they named Apis by which occasion the Israelites learned to worship a calfe August lib. 18. de civit Dei c. 4. This feare Iacob is discharged of when the Lord saith I will goe downe with thee c. the Lord promiseth to be a guide to him and his to keepe them in his feare 3. Iacob was not ignorant of the prophecie given to Abraham that his seed should be afflicted and kept under in a strange land therefore the Lord to take away that scruple telleth him that his posterity shall increase there and he will make him a great nation 4. He might thinke that his posterity being overtaken with the pleasures of Egypt would hardly returne from thence and so he should lose the hope of the inheritance of Canaan to meet with this doubt the Lord saith vers 4. I will also bring thee up againe 5. He also might feare left being a weake old man he should die by the way before he came to Ioseph therefore the Lord to make him secure in this telleth him that Ioseph shall close his eyes when he dyed vers 4. QUEST V. Of the ancient use of closing the eies of the dead Vers. 4. I will bring thee up againe and Ioseph c. 1. The Lord brought Iacob up out of Egypt when his body was carried to be buried in Canaan but most of all was it performed in his feed whom the Lord brought out of Egypt under the hand of Moses Aaron 2. It was the use to close the eyes of the dead which commonly are opened when men dying doe lift up their eyes to heaven Muscul. and therefore they that stand by doe shut them before the body is stiffe Plinie maketh mention of this solemne use among the Romans who used to shut the eies of the dead at the time of their death and to open them againe when they brought them to the fire vt neque ab homine supremum eos spectari fas sit coelo non ostendi nefas that neither saith he is it lawfull for men to see them last of all and it were impious not to shew or open them toward heaven And this duty of closing the eyes was performed by those which were dearest and best beloved of the dead as Ioseph was to Iacob whose eyes Ioseph did shut up when he had given up the ghost although no speciall mention be made of it afterward Perer. QUEST VI. What goods and substance Iacob and his sonnes carryed into Egypt Vers. 6. THey tooke their cattell and their goods which they had gotten in Canaan c. 1. Though no mention be here made of their servants yet it is like that Iacob carried them also with him and would not leave them behinde in that hard time of famine Calvin 2. Though Pharaoh sent them word that they should not regard their stuffe yet they tooke their substance with them that they might be as little chargeable as they could unto others as Abraham comming forth out of his country at the Lords commandement into Canaan brought his substance with him Gen. 12.5 Luther Mulcul 3. Mention is not made of Iacobs goods gotten in Mesopotamia but onely in Canaan not because Iacob had given those goods to Esau which is not like but because they were not to be compared to his substance which he got in Canaan and Moses speaketh also of the goods and substance of his sonnes that got all they had in Canaan being not of yeares in Mesopotamia to provide for themselves Mercer QUEST VII Of Iacobs daughters and the order observed by Moses in setting downe their names Vers. 8. HIs daughters and his sonnes daughters c. 1. Iacob had but one daughter here named Dinah of Leah and but one daughter of his sonnes Serah of Asher vers 17. yet they are put in the plurall number according to the phrase of the Hebrew as vers 23. it is said the sonnes of Dan Hushai he had but one Muscul. 2. The whole sum of Iacobs posterity borne at this time is seventy vers 27. of which number Iacob himselfe is one as the head of the rest Mercer 3. Moses setteth not downe their names according to the order of their birth as in other places c. 29.30.35 but first he rehearseth such as came of Leah and her maid then those that came of Rachel and her maid Mercer QUEST VIII Of the divers names of the sonnes of the twelue Patriarkes Vers. 10. THe sons of Simeon Iemuel Many hard and difficult questions are moved out of this chapter which shall briefly be discussed First there is great difference in the names here rehearsed and in other places of Scripture the sonnes of Simeon Iemuel and Iamin are called Nemuel and Iarib 1 Chron. 4.24 Zohar is there named Zerah vers 13. Iob the sonne of Issachar is called Iashub Numb 26.24 vers 16. Ziphion Ezbon Arodi are called Zephon Oznâ— Arod Numb 26.15.16.17 vers 21. the sonnes of Benjamin Ashbel Becher Ehi Rosh Muppim Chuppim Ard are otherwise named Iediael Acharah Nochah Rapha Shephâ—am Churam Addai 1 Chron. 8.1 2 3. It is then no strange thing in Scripture for the same men to be called by divers names sometimes with the alteration of some letters sometimes with a change of the whole name QUEST VIII Of other differences in the genealogie compared with the 26. Numer and 1. Chron. 7.8 chap. Vers. 10. THe sonnes of Simeon Iemuel Iamin Ohad 1 It is to be considered that divers of these here named are else-where omitted as Ohad is not reckoned among the sonnes of Simeon Numb 26.12 1 Chron. 4.24
be warned that they offend not in the like as this correction imposed upon Simeon and Levi was for the admonition of their brethren and posterity 3. That men feeling the justice of God in their due corrections may flee unto Gods mercy and the promises of God in Christ as Adam when he received the sentence of death for his transgression had also the promise of the Messiah given him Mercer 2. Confut. Against popish 〈…〉 SEeing then that corrections remaining after the forgivenesse of sin are to make ourselves and others more cautelous this is no ground for the Popish purgatory paines which are not visible and so serve not for the example of others neither are they availeable unto godly repentance for the which there is no place after this life Mercer 3. Confut. Peter not the chiefest of the Apostles because first 〈◊〉 Vers. 3. RVben mine eldest sonne This is to be observed that the twelve Patriarks are not rehearsed in the same order here as before Gen. 30. and Genes 27. and afterward Numb 1. 〈◊〉 33. yet 〈◊〉 these places Ruben is named first but not alwayes sometime Iudah is named before him as Numb â— 2 As then this were but a simple argument for the preheminence of Ruben before his brethren because he is in most places named first being the eldest so as simply doe the Papists conclude for Peters supremacie before the other Apostles because he is commonly named firsts which was rather because of his Eldership than any priority before the rest neither is he alwayes named in the first place for Galat. â—9 〈◊〉 is named before him 4. Confut. The bookes of Iudith and Tobie not canonicall Vers. 5. SImeon and Levi brethren in evill Hence it may appeare that the booke of Iudith is not Canonicall because there this fact of Simeon is commended cap. 9.2 which here Iacob condemneth and accurseth It satisfieth not to say with Dyonis Carthusian that the fact of Simeon and Levi in respect of the Sichemites was just but unjust in respect of them who brake their faith and covenant for Iudith commendeth their zeale which were moved with thy zeale v. 4. Neither is Lyranus and Pererius answer sufficient 1. For Iudith in that place commendeth also the manner of the fact and saith that God did put the sword of vengeance into their hand vers 2. and Iacob here curseth their very affection and zeale wherewith they were first moved Cursed be their wrath for it was cruell and further whereas Iudith doth set it downe as a reward of their zeale Thou gavest their Princes to the slaughter Iacob even therein doth accurse For in their wrath they slew a man It is evident then that the booke of Iudith was not written by the spirit of God because it commendeth that which is here condemned Seeing also Iacob remembreth Sampson in Dan Mordecai and Esther in Benjamin Barak in Nepthali it is like that Tobie also under Nepthali and Iudith in Simeon should not have beene forgotten if their stories were of like truth 5. Confut. The Pope succeedeth not Christ in this Kingdome Vers. 10. THe scepter shall not depart from Iudah Pererius applieth this to the kingdome of Christ that is his Church which shall endure for ever and so shall the Pope Christs vicar saith he who succeedeth Christ as the sonne doth the father in his authority and dignity in Gen. 49. numer 58. Conâ—â—a True it is that of Christs dominion there shall be none end and that he will alwayes have a Church upon the earth But the Pope which is the Antichrist is no successor to Christ but an usurper of his kingdome he is Christs son as the Jewes boasted they were Abrahams sonnes but Christ telleth them plainly They were of their father the Devill if ye were Abrahams children saith our Saviour ye would doâ— the workes of Abraham Iohn 8.39.44 So the Pope is his sonne whose doctrine he followeth but to forbid to marry and to teach to abstaine from meats as the Pope doth are the doctrines of Devils 1 Tim. 4.1 2. 6. Confut. Antichrist shall not come of Dan. Vers. 17. DAn shall be a serpent by the way c Divers of the ancient Writers upon this place did ground their opinion that Antichrist should come of Dan and therefore they say that tribe is omitted Apocal. 7. and this Pererius holdeth a probable opinion and worthy of credit Conâ—r 1. By this meanes that which Iacob pronounceth as a blessing upon Dan they turne to a curse and whereas Iacob speaketh of one that should be a deliverer of his people which some doe fitly apply to Sampson they would have him point out an enemy and adversary to the Church of God 2. The tribe of Dan was dispersed a thousand yeeres before Antichrist appeared in the world 3. Dan is omitted in the Apocalypse because of the idolatry which began in that tribe wherein Antichrist doth imitate him though hee come not of his stocke so likewise is Simeon omitted in Moses benediction Deuter. 33. yet they will not â—nferre that Antichrist should come of that tribe as Simeon is omitted by Moses for his evill example so Dan is by Iohn for his idolatry 7. Confut. Against Limbus 〈◊〉 Vers. 25. WHo shall blesse thee with the blessings of the deepâ—◠〈◊〉 lieth beneath Pererius maketh Ioseph here a type of Christ whom the Patriarks blessed and praised in the lake or Limbus in the deepe beneath whom he delivered from thence numer 1â—5 Contra. 1. These are but weake arguments of such weighty matters that are taken from types and figures â— Iacob speaketh here of temporall blessings of the wholesome aire pleasant dewes fruitfull ground and nourishing springs in the deepe below they are therefore unproperly applied to spirituall 3. Neither shall he ever be able to prove that the Patriarkes were shut up in the deepe below seeing that the rich man in hell looked up and lift up his eyes to Lazarus being in Abrahams bosome Luk. 16. it was then a place above not in the deepe beneath 8. Confut. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 33. WAs gathered to his people 1. Burgensis will have this people to be the fathers in Limbus to whom Iacob went so also Lyranus Contra. 1. Henoch was of this people to whom the Patriarks went after death but hee was not in Limbus hee was taken up to heaven and walked with God 2. Abraham went to his fathers in peace Gen. 15.15 that is with joy and comfort but what comfort is there in Limbus a lake and dungeon of darkenesse 3. Wherefore to be gathered to his people is not to be joyned to the Angels as gloss interlinear for Abraham is said to goe also to his fathers but the Angels were not his fathers neither is this phrase all one as to say he slept with his fathers or went the way of all flesh or changed his life as Perer. Mercer for Ismael is said also to goe to his people Genes â—5
what sex the infant was better than see them on their stooles G. them is added or see them in their birth time V.S. B. looke in the stooles A. P.H. that is into them the word abenim signifieth the stooles of women in travell so called of banim children T.P. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Why the twelve Patriarkes are so often rehearsed Vers. 1. THese are the names of the children of Israel The names of the twelve Patriarkes are so often rehearsed in Scripture 1. because of them came the twelve tribes the Priestly also and the Kingly order sprang from thence 2. And this mysticall number of twelve is used in Scripture to describe the spirituall state of the Church under Christ as twelve thousand are chosen out of every tribe Apoc. 7. and the new Jerusalem is set forth by the twelve gates and twelve foundations Apoc. 21. Simler 3. And to shew the truth and constancie of Gods promises in increasing the seed of Iacob of twelve fathers into so many thousands Pellican 4. And beside the dignitie and prerogative of the children of God herein appeareth who are chiefely remembred in Scripture where mention is made of the wicked it is by the way and as it were by accident and in a manner besides the proper intention of the Scripture Ferus QUEST II. Why Iacobs sonnes are not alwayes rehearsed in the same order Vers. 3. ISsachar Zebulon and Benjamin the Patriarkes are seldome rehearsed in the same order for Gen. 46. first Leahs children then her maide Zilpaehs then Rachels sonnes and lastly Bilhah her maides are numbred but here Benjamin Rachels sonne is set before the sonnes of the handmaides the like order is kept Genes 35. So Reuben is here named first but in the order of the campe Iudah hath the first place Num. 2. and when the spies are sent out Numb 13. another order is observed Simler The reasons hereof may be these 1. because in the old Testament for the most part the order of nature not of grace is followed for though Reuben were the eldest in birth yet Iudah had the regall preeminence Bor. 2. This is done that we should not be curious observers of numbers or mens nativities Pellican 3. The Patriarkes had now all received their fathers blessing and were incorporate into one holy people to shew therefore their equalitie and that there was no difference of the tribes before God sometimes one is named first sometime another Ferus 4. But here and Gen. 35. all the children of Iacobs wives as sonnes of free women are rehearsed before the sonnes of the maide servants Iun. Vatab. QUEST III. How they are said to be seventie soules that went downe with Iacob into Egypt Vers. 5. SO all the soules that came of Iacobs loynes were seventie 1. They were beside Iacob 66. with Iacob 67. with Ioseph his two sonnes 70. so then in this number Iacbos wives are not reckoned but onely those which came out of his loynes but Ioseph must be included and therefore it is added but Ioseph was in Egypt Iunius readeth cum Iosepho with Ioseph in the same sense 2. Whereas the Septuagint read 75. whom S. Luke followeth in Stephens storie Act. 7. because it was not safe to depart in a matter of number from the received translation Iunius thinketh that in that number all are comprehended beside Iacob that are rehearsed in that catalogue as Iacobs two wives Er and Onan which all make 75. But why should Iacob be left out in the number of 75. and included in the number of 70. and to what purpose should Er and Onan be comprehended in that summe seeing they were dead before and went not downe into Egypt But seeing the Septuag Gen. 46. doe rehearse five nephewes of Ioseph Machir and Gilead his sonne of Manasses Sutalam and Edem his sonne and Taam of Ephraim it is more like that S. Luke for the reason before alleaged therein followeth the Septuagint Aretius See more of this upon that question Gen. 46. QUEST IV. Of the wonderfull multiplying of the Israelites in Egypt 7. ANd the children of Israel fructified c. 1. The people increased exceedingly which is here expressed by foure words of like significations pâ—ru they fructified ijsrezu they brought forth in abundance as the fish ijrbu they were multiplied and jagghatzuus they waxed strong Simler 2. and so accordingly they multiplied that of 70. persons there came 700000. of every one tenne thousand Pellican Yea whereas above sixe hundred thousand of men able to goe to warre from twentie yeeres old and upward were numbred that came out of Egypt Numb 1.46 out of which number were excepted all the males under twentie and all the old men beside the women which were not so few as the men seeing it was not unusuall in those dayes for one man to have divers wives it may be supposed and is so judged by some that the whole number could not bee lesse than thirtie hundred thousand Perer. 3. QUEST V. In what time the Israelites so exceedingly increased FUrther this multiplying of the Israelites to take the longest time from the first going downe of Iacob to the returne of the Israelites thence was in the space of 215. yeeres Some thinke that the greatest increase was the first hundred yeere after that generation was dead vers 6. which is usually taken in Scripture for the space of an hundred yeeres Simler But there by that generation are understood onely the men of that age Vatab. Augustine taketh all the time after the death of Ioseph which Perer. counteth an 145. yeeres But the chiefe time of this increase was after Iosephs death before the time of their servitude how they increased also in the time of their bondage is declared afterward vers 12. Neither need this seeme strange that in the space of 215. yeeres the Israelites did so wonderfully increase seeing that forren authors doe write that Ninus who began to reigne 250. yeeres after the floud did lead in his armie against the Bactrianes 700. thousand footmen and two hundred thousand horsemen Diod. Sicul. lib. 3. cap. 2. ex Ctesia Perer. QUEST VI. By what meanes the Israelites increased HOw this wonderfull increase should be wrought 1. we neither need to thinke with Augustine that it was miraculous 2. nor with the Hebrewes to imagine that every one of them brought forth two or three at a birth Pellican For although it be often seene that women may have many at a birth as Aristotle maketh mention of one that had twentie at foure times five at every birth and that it is usuall in Egypt for the women to have two and three and sometimes five at a birth Trogus reporteth that in Egypt they bring forth sometimes seven at once Bor. yet this is not usually nor often seene 3. Therefore supposing as is most like that all the Hebrew women were very fruitfull that they bore betimes and were child-bearing long being not cut off by
his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1 Cor. 12.21
me what time I shall pray for thee to destroy the frogs Moses promiseth to pray confidently being assured that the Lord would heare him for the faithfull are sure that the Lord heareth them Ferus Who herein crosseth the judgement of the Romanists who 〈◊〉 call the assurance of faith presumption But our Saviour Christ giveth this rule that Whatsoever yee aske in prayer if ye beleeve ye shall have it it shall be done unto you Matth. 11.14 2. Conf. Against praying for the dead BEside as here Pharaoh entreateth Moses and Moses promiseth to entreate God for him so we find in other places of Scripture that the living have prayed for the living and have been prayed to pray for others but for the dead to be prayed unto to pray for the living we have no example in Scripture Pellican For they are not present to heare our prayers and succour our necessities neither doe know our heartes and wee have one sufficient advocate and Mediatour our blessed Redeemer 1. Ioh. 3.1 and therefore neither neede we the mediation of any other neither will they assume unto themselves any part of Christs office 3. Conf. Against repentance which proceedeth only of feare Vers. 15. WHen Pharaoh saw he had respite given him he hardened his heart Then Pharaohs former repentance was but in hypocrisie and proceeded only from feare of punishment such sorrow then and repentance which onely is caused by the feare of punishment is no true repentance neither continueth long yet this slauish feare of hell is much advanced and extolled by the Romanists as being a fruite of true obedience against whom I will urge the testimonie of Ferus in this place one of their owne preachers Poenitentia ex solo timore poenae proveniens non diu durat quae autem ex amore justitiae oritur haec perseverat Repentance proceeding only from the feare of punishment cannot endure long but that which springeth of the love of righteousnes the same persevereth So the Apostle saith that feare hath painfulnes and he that feareth is not perfect in love 1. Ioh. 4.18 6. Places of Morall use 1. Observ. God can arme his smallest creatures against the wicked Vers. 2. I Will smite all thy countrie with frogs The Lord can arme his smallest creatures to take revenge of the wicked as he with the sand keepeth in the sea Ierem. 5.22 so with his smallest armies he can checke and daunt the haughtie spirit of Tyrants as here Pharaoh is punished with frogs therefore feare ye not me saith the Lord Iere. 5.22 This should make us to stand in awe feare of God whose armies are alwayes readie to punish the disobedient Ferus 2. Observ. To pray for our enemies Vers. 8. WHat time I shall pray for thee Moses by this example teacheth us to pray for our enemies according to Christs rule Matth. 5. So S. Paul would have prayer supplication made for Princes 1. Tim. 2.2 even then Nero that beastly Tyrant was Emperour If it bee objected that Pharaoh sinned unto death and therefore Moses should not have prayed for him as the Apostle teacheth that such sinners are not to be prayed for 1. Ioh. 5.16 The answere is first that though Moses saw that Pharaohs heart was hardned yet he did not know whether the same might be mollified afterward Secondly he prayeth not for everlasting salvation but onely for a temporall blessing Thirdly and not so much for Pharaoh as because it should be a benefit to the whole land Simler 3. Observ. The Devils power nor his ministers is to be feared Vers. 18. THey assaied to bring forth lice but they could not Therefore not the Devill but God is to bee feared for the Devill hath no power unlesse God permit to invade man or beast he could not runne upon the uncleane swine till Christ had given leave Perer. If the Devill be not to be feared much lesse his ministers as Sorcerers Conjurers Witches God bridleth both them and their master that without the will of our heavenly father he cannot touch a haire of our head 4. Observ. God will not have his servants tempted above their strength AGaine whereas it was a great triall and temptation to the Israelites to see these wicked Sorcerers to contend with Moses in working of wonders the Lord will not trie them beyond their strength but at the length confoundeth the Sorcerers lest his servants might have stumbled and fell Perer. as the Apostle saith God is faithfull and will not suffer you to be tempted above that you are able 1. Cor. 10.13 CHAP. IX 1. The Argument and method IN this Chapter three other plagues are described the fift of the murrane of cattell to vers 8. the sixt of the botches and sores to vers 13 the seventh of the thunder haile and lightning to the end of the Chapter In the first part containing a description of the first plague we have first the denouncing of the plague with the occasion thereof if Pharaoh refuse to let Israel goe vers 1.2 the manner thereof vers 3. the limitation thereof the Israelites are exempted vers 4. the time is appointed vers 5. Secondly the execution followeth vers 6.3 The events are two Pharaoh sendeth to see how it fared with the Israelites cattell and his heart is hardned vers 7. In the second part containing the sixth plague there is the commandement of God to Moses and Aaron prescribing the signe of the plague in taking the ashes vers 8. and the effect vers 9. secondly the execution vers 10. thirdly the events which are two the plague of biles overtaketh the Sorcerers themselves vers 11. yet Pharaohs heart is hardned vers 12. In the third part where the seventh plague is described there is 1. The commandement of God to denounce the plague in which denuntiation wee have first the occasion of this plague Pharaohs refusall to let the people go vers 13. then a description of the plague in generall vers 14. and the end why God had not consumed them with the pestilence and other plagues that God might shew his power vers 15.16 then a particular designing of the plague vers 18. with advice and counsell given how to scape the plague vers 19. and the successe of that counsell vers 20.21 2. The execution followeth where God commanded Moses vers 22. Moses obeyeth vers 23. the effect followeth set forth by way of comparison vers 24. 3. The events are these first what hurt the haile and storme did vers 25. the preservation of Israel vers 26. the relenting of Pharaoh and his request to Moses vers 27.28 Moses admonition first to Pharaoh vers 29. with a parenthesis what things were smitten with the tempest what not vers 31. Moses prayer with the effect vers 33. the hardning of Pharaohs heart vers 34.35 2. The Argument and Method Vers. 3. VPon the cattell the sheepe with a very great plague I. better than upon the cattel sheepe shall
to have beene ten the first for want of water Exod. 17. the second likewise for water Numb 20. the third Exod. 14. when the Egyptians pursued them the fourth and fifth about Manna when they kept it till the morning and gathered it upon the Sabbath Exod. 16. The sixth murmuring was for flesh Exod. 16. and the seventh for flesh likewise Numb 11.4 The eighth for Moses absence when they made the golden Calfe the ninth when they tempted God in fighting against the Amalckites being forbidden Numb 14. The tenth upon the returne of the Spies which were sent to search the Land of Canaan Hieron dâ— 10. tentationib But if all the murmurings of the Israelites be summed together they will bee found more than ten not fewer than twenty And they were of three sorts either generall of the whole congregation or speciall of some few or particular of some principall persons 1. Their generall murmurings were upon these occasions first for things which they endured as the increasing of their bondage in Egypt at the first comming of Moses Exod. 5.21 their feare to be all destroyed of the Egyptians chap. 14.11 their wearinesse of the way Numb 11.1 their biting by Serpents Numb 21. Secondly for things which they wanted as for sweet and potable water Exod. 15.24 for bread chap. 16.3 for water in Rephidim Exod. 17. for flesh Numb 11. for water againe when Moses also offended Numb 20. Thirdly they murmured and disobeyed when any thing was imposed them which they liked not as twiâ—e they were disobedient about Manna in reserving it till the morning chap. 16.19 and in gathering it upon the Sabbath chap. 16.28 where although their murmuring be not expressed yet this their refractary disobedience could not bee without murmuring So they rebelled in fighting against the Amalekites and Canaanites being forbidden Numb 14.41 Fourthly they murmured when their expectation was deceived as upon Moses long absence Exod. 32.1 when they heard a false report of Canaan that the inhabitants thereof were invincible Numb 14. when Core Dathan and Abiram with their adherents were suddenly destroyed Numb 16.41 These murmurings in all were sixteene 2. The second kind of murmuring was of some speciall men as Core Dathan and Abirain with two hundred and 50. persons murmured against Moses and Aaron Numb 16.3 The third kind was of some principall persons as of Aaron and Miriam against Moses Numb 12. Of Moses himselfe at the waters of strife Numb 20. of Aaron being discontent and so negligent in his office because of the death of his two sonnes Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10.19 Here are foure more and unto these others by diligent observations may be added QUEST XXXIX Whether the wood had any vertue in it that Moses cast â—nto the water 25. ANd he cried unto the Lord and the Lord shewed him a tree 1. The Hebrewes thinke that this tree had no vertue at all in it to make the waters sweet but rather the contrary but that God would therein shew his power in healing one contrary by another as Elizeus did heale the waters by casting in of salt which was more like to have made them more bitter and our Saviour anointed the eyes of the blinde with clay and spittle which was an unlike thing to heale them 2. But it is more probable that there was some vertue in this wood to season and relish the water because it is said that the Lord shewed him or as the Hebrew word signifieth taught him the tree Tanquam tale jam liguâ—â—â—oc esseâ— quo posset hoc fieri As though it were such a kinde of wood as could doe this thing So Augustine reasoneth quaest 57. in Exod. to whom Calvinus and Simlerus consent for to what end else did the Lord direct Moses to that speciall tree more than to others unlesse we say that there were no trees there at all in the desert But the words will inferre another sense that seeing the Lord shewed him a tree there was a tree to be shewed as the Lord caused Hagar to see a fountaine not which newly sprung out of the ground but which was there before though she saw it not Gen. 21. The author of Ecclesiasticus chap. 38.5 affirmeth that there was vertue in the wood 3. But Iosephus is deceived who saith Moses fructum ligni accepit forte ibi jacens That Moses tooke a peece of wood lying there by chance whereas the Lord shewed it him and he further addeth that Moses did not cast in the wood because the people asked what it should doe but caused a great part of the water to bee drawne out of the fountaine and so the residue became sweet but this is also directly contrary to the text QUEST XL. Wherein the miracle consisted of healing the waters NOw although there were some vertue in this wood to heale the waters yet it was done not without a great mâ—racle 1. Which consisted not herein because the Lord Ostendit et lignum ubi nullum erat Shewed him a tree where none was for this is confuted before 2. Neither Quâ—a in tali natura ligni Creator demonstrator lâ—â—dandus est Because the Creator and shewer is to be praised in giving such a nature to the wood as Augustine in the same place for if the nature of the wood had done it it had not beene miraculous 3. But herein was the miracle that by the meanes of so small a peece of wood such a deale of water was changed as served such a great multitude Calvin And that it was suddenly and presently changed Simler And the waters were but made sweet only for that time and afterward returned to their bitter nature againe as Pliny before alleaged maketh mention of bitter waters there Iun. QUEST XLI Why the Lord used this meane in healing of the waters GOd could have healed the waters if it had pleased him without this tree But it pleased him to use this meanes for these causes 1. To teach us that we should not neglect the meanes which God appointed So the Lord divided the red sea and dried the way by a strong East winde Ezechias was healed by a lumpe of figges So God instructeth men and begetteth them to the faith by the ministery of men Simler 2. God hereby also reproveth their distrust and diffidence shewing Multa sibi in promptu esse remedia quibusque malis That he hath many remedies in store for whatsoever evils Calvin 3. Hoc medio uti voluit propter mysterium He would use this meane because of the mystery Ferus QUEST XLII Of the mysticall signification of this tree NOw what mystery is signified in this tree that sweetned the waters shall bee shewed in a word 1. Some by the bitter waters doe understand the killing letter of the Law which is impotable and unpleasant but being qualified by the Gospell Iam dulcâ—â— erit litera The letter of the Law becommeth pleasant Ferus 2. This tree was a figure of that rod which should come of the
much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta sunt for so also the flesh
for that heathenish conceit of the Philosopher that vertue is not properly said to be in women it is contrary to that position of the Apostle that in Christ there is neither male nor female Galath 3.28 the spirit of God can plant grace and vertue in the hearts of women as well as of men nay often the Lord chuseth the weake things of this world to confound the mighty things 1. Cor. 1.27 And the examples of so many vertuous and good women in the Scriptures of Sara Rebecca Anna the Shunamite and the rest in the old of Marie Anna Martha Lydia Dorcas and many other in the new Testament doe evidently confute that prophane paradox of the Philosopher 4. And to deliver the regiment of women from the Cardinals vile and impure slaunder this country and nation of ours as is hath found the government of a woman the worst in the late Marian persecutions when more good men and women Saints of God were put to death than in any three Kings reigne beside so have we seene it in the next change the best of all other Princes reignes that went before famous Queene Elizabeths government as for flourishing peace honourable fame and name enriching of the Land subduing of forraine enemies enacting of good lawes may be compared with the reigne of any former Kings So for the advancing of true religion increasing of learning propagating the Gospell none of her predecessors came neere her That as the refining of coine being reduced from base money to pure silver and gold was her honour in the Civill State so the purging of religion according to the purity of the word of God in the Church shall bee her everlasting fame in the world and is her eternall reward with God 4. Confut. That Christ shall have no Iudges under him at the latter day but shall be the only Iudge himselfe Vers. 22. LEt them judge all small causes Origen upon these words hath this private conceit Hanc sâ—guram Iudicum non solum in hoc seculo sed etiam in futuro servandam c. 〈◊〉 this forme of Iudges shall be observed not only in this world but in the next And then he alleageth that text Matth. 18.28 That when the Sonne of man shall sit in the throne of Majesty yee which have followed me in the regeneration shall sit upon twelve seats and judge the twelve tribes of Israel Whereupon he inferreth that Christ at the day of judgement shall appoint other Judges beside himselfe Qui judicent populum de mineribus causiâ— c. Which shall judge the people in smaller causes referring the greater to him The Rhemisnis and Romanistes whose manner is to scrape all the refuse of the Fathers affirme likewise That the faithfull shall judge and give sentence with Christ at the latter day wresting the same text in Matthew to the same purpose Contra. 1. The Apostles and Saints are said indeed to judge the world but not in that sense as Christ is said to be the Judge of the world but as he saith his Word shall judge them at the latter day Ioh. 12.48 that is be a witnesse against them so the Word preached by the Saints in their life and their conversation following the same shall be a witnesse against the world and so their condemnation like as in the processe of judgement here in earth the evidence that is brought in and the witnesses produced are said to condemne the guilty partie and to judge them though the Judge only give sentence Thus Ambrose fitly expoundeth this phrase Iudicabunt Sancti hunc mundum quia exemplo fidei illorum perfidia mundi damnabitur The Saints shall judge the world because by example of their faith their perfidiousnesse shall be condemned 2. For otherwise if Christ should observe the same forme which Moses did to appoint coadjutors because he alone sufficed not this were to derogate from his all sufficient power who needeth not as man any assistants or fellow helpers Vers. 22. Every great matter let them bring to thee Upon this president the Romanistes would ground the papall reservation of cases from whom no appeale say they is to be made as there was not from Moses Tostat. quaest 11. in 18. cap. Exod. Contra. 1. There is great difference betweene the reservation of matters to Moses and of certaine cases to the Pope for Moses was set over but one nation which at this time encamped together within the compasse of not many miles and so they might with ease bring the weighty causes to him But the Pope challengeth to be the supreme Judge over all the world and so without infinite trouble the greater causes cannot be brought unto him 2. Moses judgement was sought for because hee could not erre having often conference with God to direct him as the Pope hath not and this Testatus confesseth Romanus pontifex c. The Roman Bishop though he have great power sometime is not a man very vertuous and though he be because he hath not God present to answer unto all his demands facilius errare potest he may more easily erre therefore that is but a foppish and fawning conclusion of the Canonists that the Pope hath Omnia jura in scrinio pectoris All lawes in his breast 3. Whereas Iethro intended in this device the peoples ease not to goe farre for their causes and Moses ability to performe his office neither of these inconveniences is helped in making appeales to Rome for neither is the Pope able to amend all such causes and the people would be infinitely molested to be hurried to Rome 4. And if it were not for the advantage of the Court and Consistory of Rome they would desire to bee eased rather of than cumbred with such appeales But Moses herein only sought the profit of Gods people not his owne Simler 6. Morall Observations 1. Obs. To take heed of idle and vaine talke Vers. 8. THen Moses told his father in law c. Moses did conferre with Iethro about the wondrous workes of God which the Lord had wrought for them Vnde arguuntur hi qui vanis colloquiis delectantur They then are reproved which are delighted with vaine talke Ferus Which may serve as a good motive in our dayes to cut off idle if not very prophane conference when wee meet remembring ever that of idle words we must give an account B. Babington 2. Observ. Workes must be joyned with faith Vers. 12. THen Iethro tooke burnt offerings c. Having beene thankfull in words now he addeth deeds for S. Iames calleth that a dead faith where workes want if we joyne both these together as Iethro did we shall fully give assurance both to others and to our selves of our true faith B. Babington 3. Obs. That we should doe all our workes as in Gods sight Vers. 12. THey came to eat bread with Moses father in law before God Hereupon Origen well noteth Sancti manducant bibunt in conspectu Dei c. The
had taken Lot prisoner and delivered him out of their hands Gen. 14. 3. The manner also must bee considered that although the cause of warre be just yet that it be not rashly set upon but all other meanes must first be tried as Ezekiah before he would by force resist the King of Assyria sought to have pacified him by paying a certaine tribute 2 King 18.14 So the children of Israel before they assaulted their brethren the children of Benjamin by open warre because of the wickednesse of the Gibeonites committed against the Levites wife first required of them that those wicked men might be delivered into their hands which when they wilfully refused then they resolved to set upon them Iudg. 20.13 Ex Simlero 4. Confut. Against the Romanists that make difference betweene counsels and precepts IN the next place the Romanists are to bee dealt withall and here commeth first to be examined that assertion that whereas we affirme that even in this Commandement Thou shalt not kill that dutie of charitie is prescribed even in loving our enemies they affirme that this is no precept which we are bound to keepe but a counsell of perfection and a worke of supererogation Thom. Aquin. 2.2 qu. 25. art 9. Contra. 1. This derogateth from the authoritie of Christ to say that he gave counsell to his Disciples and did not by his authoritie command them 2. Seeing all the duties of charitie are required by the law for love is the fulfilling of the law it followeth that even this dutie also in loving our enemies is enacted by the law and not left free 3. Our Saviour adding further as a reason hereof that ye may bee children of your Father which is in heaven sheweth that wee cannot otherwise bee the true children of our heavenly Father unlesse we be like him herein even in loving of our enemies then it will follow that it is not a counsell of conveniencie but a precept of necessitie Ex Bastingio See more of this popish distinction of counsels and precepts Synops. Centur. 1. err 84. 5. Confut. Against the Popish distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes ANother assertion of the Romanists here to be taxed is that anger si sit talis motus ut deducatur ratio est peccatum mortale c. If it be such a motion as that the reason is drawne to consent it is a mortall sinne Si usque ad consensum non pervertitur ratio est peccatum venidle c. But if reason be not perverted to consent then it is a veniall sinne but if it bee not a mortall or deadly sinne in the nature and kinde thereof as is murther and adulterie then although there be a consent it is no mortall sinne Sic Thom. in opuscul This distinction of sinnes veniall and not veniall in their owne nature in respect of the greatnesse or smalnesse of the sinne is not to bee admitted for these reasons 1. In the respect of the nature of sinne which of it selfe deserveth death Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death and sinne is the transgression of the law 1 Ioh. 3.4 and every transgression of the law is under the curse Galath 3.10 2. In respect of the infinite Majestie of God which to violate can bee no veniall sinne of it selfe considering also the perfect and absolute righteousnesse of God which cannot abide the least blemish or imperfection therefore in regard of the perfect righteousnesse and infinite Majestie of God no sinne committed against God can in it selfe bee veniall 3. And concerning this motion and passion of anger even when it is sudden and unadvised though there bee no further purpose or intendment to hurt it is guiltie of judgement Matth. 5.22 Where by the way it shall not bee amisse to note the difference here betweene Thomas Aquin and Bellarmine for Thomas holdeth this anger here spoken of to bee a deadly sinne in that he saith He that is angrie with his brother shall be guiltie of judgement it must be understood dâ— matu tendente in nocumentum c. of a motion tending to hurt where there is consent and so that motion is deadly sinne Sic Thomas in opuscul Ex Lippoman But Bellarmine affirmeth that this is a veniall sinne and so deserveth not everlasting damnation because hell fire is onely due unto the last to call one foole Bellarm. lib. 1. de purgator cap. 4. Contra. 1. Every mortall sinne deserveth damnation but in Thomas Aquins judgement as is shewed before this anger here spoken of is a mortall sinne Ergo. 2. The naming of hell fire onely in the last place sheweth not a divers kinde of punishment from the rest but a divers degree of punishment for otherwise judgement in Scripture â—s taken for damnation as Psal. 143.2 Enter not into judgement with thy servant for no flesh is righteous in thy sight So Rom. 2.1 In that thou judgest another thou condemnest thy selfe Here to judge and condemne are taken for all one to be culpable then of judgement is to bee guiltie of damnation 4. Yet we admit this distinction of veniall and mortall sinnes if it be understood not in respect of the nature of sinne but of the qualitie of the persons for unto those that beleeve all sinnes are veniall and pardonable through the mercie of God Rom. 8.1 There is no condemnation to those that are in Christ Iesus but to the wicked and unbeleevers all their sinnes are mortall Rom. 6.23 to them the stipend and wages of sinne is death See more also hereof Synops. Papis Centur. 4. err 6. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Not to be hastie to anger THou shalt not kill Our blessed Saviour expounding this Commandement Matth. 5.22 sheweth that even hee which is angrie unadvisedly transgresseth this precept which may bee a caveat unto furious cholerike and hastie men that they should bridle their intemperate affections and not give place to rage for as Chrysostome saith Si concedatur licentia irascendi datur causa homicidii faciendi If libertie be granted unto anger even cause many times will bee given of murther But if any man shall say when hee is angrie with a man for railing and reviling that hee is angrie with his sinne let him consider that when he heareth the name of God blasphemed he is not so much moved which sheweth that he is angrie in respect of his owne name and person which is called in question and not simply for the sinne Simler 2. Observ. The challenging of one another into the field forbidden ANd if it be simply unlawfull to kill then let such looke unto it that take it to be their honour and estimation to challenge one another into the field whereupon often ensueth murther for we have otherwise learned in the Scriptures Omnem cupiditatem seipsum ulciscendi vetitam esse That all desire for a man to revenge himselfe is unlawfull Simler For such doe usurpe the Lords office The Wise-man saith Say not thou I will recompence
the law of Christ but that much was permitted and tolerated unto the Jewes onely for the hardnesse of their heart as our blessed Saviour sheweth Matth. 19. 2. Some doe urge the lawes of men and the greater punishments which have beene laid upon women for adulterie rather than upon men and that therefore the sinne of the woman should bee the greater But this sheweth not the greatnesse of the sinne before God but the greater inconvenience that is brought upon the civill and politike state which the lawes of men seeke chiefly to preserve by the adulterie of the woman rather than of the man 3. Some thinke that it is a greater sinne in the man because of his authoritie quia vir caput mulieris because the man is head of the woman and the Apostle biddeth that women if they would learne any thing should aske their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 Est ergo vir doctor mulieris The man then is the womans teacher then as the Priest sinneth more than a lay man because he is his teacher so the man doth more grievously offend than the woman Thomas in opuscul But this proveth not that the sinne of the man simply is greater than the sinne of the woman but in a certaine respect 4. Wherefore the best answer is that the sinne of adulterie in some respects is equall in both sexes and in some other greater both in the one and the other 1. In regard of the law of Matrimonie whereby they have given their faith each to the other the sinne seemeth to be equall for the man hath no more power over himselfe in this behalfe than the woman as S. Paul teacheth 1 Cor. 7.4 and therefore by Moses law as well the adulterer as the adulteresse was to be put to death 2. But in respect of the qualitie and condition of the person because the woman is the weaker vessell and the man is the head of the woman and of the more strength this sinne is greater in the man because hee therein give than evill example to the weaker partie and teacheth her an evill lesson Ecclesiasticus 9.1 3. But the inconveniences considered that follow hereupon as the ignominie and shame of houses the confusion of inheritances and the obtruding of false heires by the adulterie and false play of women their sinne is thought to exceâ—d Simler Which might be the reason also why among the Jewes the men were permitted to have divers wives but not the women to have divers husbands QUEST IX Whether adulterie be now necessarily to be punished by death SOmewhat here would bee inserted concerning the punishment of adulterie by the sentence of death wherein there are these three opinions 1. Some thinke that adulterie ought to be punished capitally according to the judiciall law of Moses and not otherwise Piscaetor giveth divers reasons hereof but two especially I will single out 1. Delicta temporibus naturam suam non mutant Sinnes doe not change their nature in time 2. Deus naturam suam non mutat Neither doth God change his nature so that he hateth sinne no lesse now than in times past neither will he have it lesse punished Praefat. in Exod. Contra. 1. The nature of sinne is the same though the punishment bee altered adulterie is as grievous before God now as it was under the law but the circumstances as of place and person so also of time may give occasion of aggravating or alleviating the punishment Hee that gathered sticks upon the Sabbath was stoned to death Numb 30. because it was necessarie that the law at the beginning being then newly given should bee established by severitie But yet our Saviour excuseth his Apostles for gathering and rubbing eares of corne upon the Sabbath Matth. 12. Saint Peter pronounced the sentence of death upon Aâ—amas and Sapphira for deteining part of that which they had given to the Church for the terror and example of others yet now such dissimulation is not held to be worthie of death 2. Neither is God changed by the changing or mitigating the rigour of the law but he removing the same applieth his law according to the different respect of 〈◊〉 and persons for as well hee might bee said to be changed in the changing of other 〈◊〉 as of the ceremoniall and judicials thereto annexed 4. If all judicials annexed to the Morall law are now to be necessarily retained then the violating of the rest of the Lords day as then of the Sabbath which was in that respect morall should be punished with death and blaspheming and prophaning of the name of God by swearing as Levit. 24.16 which would seeme to be too rigorous 5. And seeing the times of the Gospell are the times of mercie and those under the Law were the times of rigour and severitie to abate somewhat of the rigorous punishments of the Law not leaving sinne unpunished may seeme not unlawfull 2. Another opinion is that adulterie is not at all now to be punished by death for our Saviour would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie Ioh. 8. Contra. 1. Upon that example of Christ it cannot be gathered that it is unlawfull to censure adultery by death for it would follow as well that adultery is not to be punished at all because Christ inflicteth no punishment at all upon her onely this may be inferred that by Christs silence and forbearance it appeareth that the punishment of adultery by death is not necessary for if his will had beene that the rigour of that law should stand in force our Saviour needed not to have feared their trap lest they should have condemned him of rigour and severitie if he had judged her worthie of death and if he had repealed that law they would have accused him as contrarie to Moses 3. This then may bee collected by Christs silence and connivence that it is not necessarie that adulterie should alwayes and in all places be sentenced unto death but rather that it is left indifferent that neither those Churches are to be condemned of too great severitie which follow the president of Moses judicials herein nor yet they are to be accused of too much lenitie which judge adulterie otherwise than by death as they see it best to fit their estate so that the severitie of the punishment be answerable to the quality of the sinne By Moses law they which committed adulterie were to die the death that is if it were duplex adulterium that both the adulterer and adulteresse were married or if the woman were anothers wife Levit. 20.10 otherwise it was not death for a married man beside his wife to have a Concubine or to one wife to take another so shee were not anothers wife What will they thinke now of such single adulterie that would have it revenged by death they have no president in Moses law for the punishing of this kinde of adulterie by death then it is evident that all adulterie by the law of Moses was not adjudged to
may bee some blemish and imperfection in the manner seeing our best actions are stained as the Prophet saith All our righteousnesse is 〈◊〉 filthie clouts Isai. 64.4 3. If veniall sin be taken for a small offence wee denie not but that such blemishes are found in matrimoniall duties which are tolerated and covered in mariage according to that excellent saying of Augustine Libidinis voluptas non propter nuptias cadit in culpam sed propter nuptias accipit veniam The pleasure of lusts doth not take blame because of mariage but for mariage sake doth receive pardon Lib. 1. de concupis cap. 15. 4. But mortall or deadly sin in mariage there is none that is in his sense haynous and grievous for if his meaning be that the fleshly desire would extend it selfe to another that is coveteth strange flesh this is not incident unto any act of mariage but is a violating of mariage by adulterous and unchaste thoughts And if there could be any sâ—ch mortall and deadly sin in the duties of mariage what is become of that saying of the Apostle concerning the giving in mariage Hee sinneth not 1 Cor. 7.36 which also may bee understood of the duties of mariage Augustine hath this worthie saying Sicut bono uti malè malum est ita maleâ—ti bene bonum est benè utitur bono continentiam dedicans Deo bono utitur malè continentiam dedicons idolo malo utitur male concupiscentiam relaxans adulteriâ— bene utitur malo concupiscentiam restringâ—â—s connubio As it is evill to use a good thing evill so it is good to use an evill thing well as hee useth a good thing well that dedicateth his continencie unto God hee useth a good thing evill that dedicateth his continencie to an Idoll hee useth an evill thing evill that doth loose the reines of his concupiscence to adulterie he useth an evill thing evill who restraineth his concupiscence to matrimonie August cont Pelag. 1.19 If he doe an evill thing well that limiteth and keepeth his concupiscence within the bounds of mariage hee then cannot sinne mortally V. Confut. Against Tostatus that would not have simple fornication punished by humane lawes AGainst Tostatus here also worthily exception is taken who justifieth this defect and imperfection in humane lawes he meaneth such as are practised among the Romanists which doe not punish simple fornication these are his words Injustissima civilis lex esset qua â—eretrices tolleret That should be a most unjust Civill law which should take away strumpets and punish simple fornication c. Wee will see and examine his reasons 1. Civill lawes are only to restraine such sins whereby justice is violated and injurie done unto another but in fornication there is no act of injustice Non est ibi aliqua persona cui inferatur injuria There is no person there to whom any injurie can bee done Contra. There is a manifold wrong committed in single fornication 1. They offer wrong and dishonour unto Christ in making the members of Christ the members of an harlot 1 Cor. 6.15 2. They injurie themselves in sinning against their owne bodies in defiling and polluting them ibid. vers 18. 3. They doe wrong unto their posteritie bringing upon them the shame of bastardie making them illegitimate and disenabling them to inherit 2. If humane lawes should punish fornication it would give occasion unto adulterie incest Sodomitrie seeing the most in a common-wealth are weake and imperfect and if they were restrained from this smaller vice they would fall into greater enormitieâ— Contra. 1. As though God hath not appointed a remedie against fornication and all other uncleannesse by lawfull matrimonie shall men make themselves wiser than God and seeke to cure one evill by another 2. And thus the divine order is perverted among the Romanists for they restraine mariage and give way unto fornication and therefore it is no marvell if among them such unnaturall lusts doe reigne Bernard well sheweth the reason thereof Tolle de Ecclesia honorabile conjugâ—um c. Take away from the Church honorable matrimonie he saith not take away harlots and brothel houses as Tostatus doth shal ye not replenish it with incestuous persons with concubinaries Sodomiticall vices c. supeâ— Cant. serm 66. 3. Humane lawes are not to forbid all sinnes because Homo legem ponens non potest dare gratiam praeservativam c. because man making a law cannot give preseruing grace to keepe it and this was the cause why Lex Mosis non prohibâ—bat omnia vitia Moses law did not forbid all vices because therein was no grace given or helpe ministred to avoid them therefore some things were permitted among them as to take usurie of the Gentiles to give a bill of divorcement and such like So Tostatus quaest 23. Contra. 1. By this reason humane lawes should forbid no sins because Gods word not mans law giveth grace to abstaine from any sin 2. Neither is there any sin forbidden in the new Testament against the morall law which is not prohibited in the old as it may appeare by our blessed Saviours interpretation of the law Mat. 5. wherein he giveth no new law but only expoundeth the old 3. Though Moses law gave no grace to keepe it yet because it was a Schoolemaster to bring us unto Christ Gal. 3.19 it was fit it should be a perfect law and containe a strict rule of all righteousnesse that men the rather should bee driven unto Christ seeing themselves to come so farre short 4. The toleration of some things among the Israelites for their hardnesse of heart sheweth not a defect in the law but an imperfection in them that could not bee subject to the perfect rule of the law 5. And concerning the punishment of fornication it was not omitted in Moses law for although fornication with one were recompenced with marriage and paying of the dowrie Deut. 22.24 yet if a daughter in Israel did play the whore she was stoned to death ibid. vers 21. And seeing the law saith There shall not bee a whore of the daughters of Israel Deut. 23.17 how dare any defend the tolerating and suffering of whores in a Christian Common-wealth 4. Morall observations 1. Obser. Against shamelesse adulterers that thrust themselves into the Congregation of the Lords people THou shalt not commit adulterie This sin being so haynous in the sight of God whereby both the ordinance of God is perverted and matrimoniall faith mutually given violated and the Temples of the holy Ghost defiled hereby their impudencie unshamefastnesse and profanenesse is evident that being guiltie of this sin dare presume to come into the Lords house to offer themselves to heare the Word to receive the Sacraments or communicate in any other exercise of religion against whom the Prophet thus enveigheth Will you steale murther commit adulterie c. and come and stand before me in this house whereupon my name is called and say wee are delivered though wee have done all these
other kinde of theft is of things that are prophane and civill which are of two sorts either publike or private 1. The publike theft is either direct when as the publike treasurie is robbed which is much greater than the theft of private things because it redoundeth to the hurt and losse of many Hereunto may be adjoyned the defrauding of such gifts as are bequeathed to publike uses as Iudas was a theefe in robbing the almes of the poore 2. Indirect publike theft is when they which are put in trust with the common goods doe waste and mispend them as Demosthenes said when a poore theefe was led to prison by the officers Parvum furem à majoribus duci That a smal theefe was carried by the greater theeves Private theft is either by taking the things belonging to others consenting or deteyning and withholding them the first is distinguished in respect of the matter the things that are stollen and taken away or the 〈◊〉 The things are of foure sorts 1. Of men which kinde of theft was punished by death by the law of 〈…〉 21.16 2. Of cattell as the stealing of Oxe or Sheepe which theft was punished by restitution Exod. 22.1 3. Of goods which are called moveables whereof see the law Exod. 22. 7. 4. In remooving of land markes which kinde of theft concerned their lands and possessions Deut. 19. 14. Now theft also differeth in the manner for it is either committed by privie and secret stealth which wee call pilfring and filching of which kinde the Prophet Ieremie speaketh chap. 2.26 As a theefe is ashamed when he is taken or by breaking into houses Exo. 22.2 which is commonly called Burglarie or by open force and violence such is robbing by the high way whereof mention is made in the parable of the Samaritane of the man that fell among theeves and was wounded and left for halfe dead Luk. 10. This kinde of private theft is also committed by consenting and being accessarie thereunto Psal. 50. 18. When thou seest a theefe thou runnest with him such are those also which give entertainment to theeves and are their receivers to keepe such things as are stollen which kinde of confederacie with theeves is punished by humane lawes Simler Further they are guiltie also of theft that detaine and withhold the goods of others as they which finde things that are lost and doe not restore them Likewise they which borrow things of their neighbour and doe not make them good See the law Exod. 22.14 They which are indebted to others and have no care to pay their debts but runne away with others goods such are fugitives and voluntarie bankrouts All these are held guiltie of this sin of theft before God and obey not the Apostles rule Give to all men their duty Rom. 13.7 And verse 8. Owe nothing to any man but love one another Where the Apostle maketh two kinde of debts whereof the one may be so paid as nothing remaine of the debt the other is alwaies in paying and never paid which is the debt of charitie Marbachius QUEST IX Of the divers kinds of transactions and contracts THere remaineth the third branch of the first generall kinde of theft and that is by fraud and circumvention which is of two sorts either in such actions and contracts as are lawfull of themselves or by such acts and devices as are altogether unlawfull Now just and lawfull transactions and contracts are of divers sorts and namely these ten in buying and selling giving exchanging pawning trusting farming copartnership tenure for service hiring lending and borrowing all which may bee brought to these two heads all these alienations are either both of the use and right and ownership of a thing or of the use only and each of them either for ever and in perpetuall or for a time only 1. Buying and selling is a bargaining for an equivalent price for any thing both in right and in use 2. Giving is a franke donation of a thing without any satisfaction or recompence 3. Exchanging when one thing is given for another of like value These transactions are perpetuall both of the right of a thing and the use For the use only and not the right are these that follow 4. Morgaging or laying to pawne when house or land or any other thing is conveyed over to another for a certaine time til some condition required be performed Contracts which concerne the use only are these also either for a time 5. As committing a thing to ones trust to keepe 6. Letting out any thing to farme for a certaine rent 7. Copartnership when one putteth in the stocke another employeth his paines and are agreed to divide the profit 8. And when one taketh any ground by tenure and holdeth it for doing of some kinde of service 9. Hiring when one for his money hath the use of a thing 10. When the use of a thing is granted without paying any thing for a time Vrsinus QUEST X. Of the divers kinds of fraud and deceit used in contracts NOw in these lawfull kinds of contracts the frauds which are usually committed are these 1. In the matter and substance and qualitie of the thing transacted and bargained for as when sophisticate and deceitful ware is uttered for that which is good and sound as wine mixed with water in stead of good wine and spices ungarbled and refuse for good and merchandable spice the like deceit may be in cloth in come and all other kind of Merchandize as Amos 8.6 the rich covetous say That wee may buy the poore for silver c. and sell the refuse of Wheat 2. There may be deceit in the quantitie when as the seller useth false weights and measures therefore the law saith Levit. 19.35 You shall not doe unjustly in judgement in line in weight or in measure 3. When too great a price is exacted and the buyer is not ashamed to aske double the price of his ware and sometime take it also as the Prophet crieth out against the covetous men that did sell corne and Made the Ephah small and the shekel great Amos. 8.5 They made the measure lesse and the price greater Genevens 4. Deceit also may be used in the coyne as in clipping it countersetting and corrupting it Simler And therefore it is said that Abraham weighed unto Ephron silver 400. shekels of currant money among Merchants Gen. 23.16 it was both weight and currant money not sophisticated 5. As in bargaining by selling so in other contracts the like deceit may bee practised as in hiring when either the hireling doth not his service faithfully or truly but doth his businesse with eye-service which the Apostle reproveth Ephes. 6.6 or when the master that hireth detaineth the hirelings wages or keepeth it backe by fraud Iames 5.4 as in paying lesse than hee should or with bad money or obtruding and thrusting upon them other base commodities in stead of their wages Simler QUEST XI Of unlawfull and cosening trades THe other
to Moses but their Elders and the chiefe of them came in the name of the rest Deut. 5.23 Iun. QUEST V. Why the people desire that Moses would speake unto them Vers. 19. ANd said to Moses talke thou with us 1. Some doe here lay fault and blame upon the Israelites in refusing to heare the voice of God and chusing rather that Moses should speake unto them But the Lord commendeth them for so doing Deut. 5.28 They have well said all that they have spoken Therefore they thus spake not as preferring Moses voice before the Lords but because they were not able to heare the Lords voice being so terrible Tostat. quaest 37. 3. And the Lord terrified his people with his thundering voice for these two causes 1. That the people hereby should learne and be taught to feare the Lord. 2. And that they might be driven of themselves by this meanes to desire the ministery of Moses in speaking unto them for it was fit and requisite that as the Lord the Authour and founder of nature had by his owne mouth given such Lawes as were grounded upon nature such as were so evident even by the light of nature as that every one might at the first understand and acknowledge them so that the rest of the Lawes which were not so evident but needed explanation should be declared and rehearsed by Moses Sic Tostat. 4. Beside herein Moses was a type and figure of Christ who is the Mediator betweene God and us and by whom the will of God is revealed unto us Marbach Pelarg. 5. Moses herein formam boni aâ—ditoris describit c. describeth the forme of a good auditour who promiseth to heare and fulfill the precepts of their master Gloss. interlinear QUEST VI. Why the people are afraid they shall dye Vers. 19. LEt not God talke with us lest we dye Wee shall finde in Scripture that it was an usuall thing for men to feare that if they had seene God they should dye as Iacob counteth it a great benefit that he had seene God and yet lived Genes 32. So Gedeon and Manoah when they had seene God were afraid 1. Tostatus maketh this the cause of this feare that if they heard Gods voice any more they should dye because of the infirmity of the body which could not endure the Lords terrible voice for as the harmony of the body is dissolved by any excessive quality as with exceeding great heat or cold Ita excellens tolerabile vel terribile corrumpit potentiam tolerantem So an exceeding terrible or tolerable thing corrupteth and confoundeth the tolerating faculty Tostat. quast 38. But the cause of this feare is not so much in the body for Adam before his fall could endure the voice of God well enough 2. Some understand this of everlasting death Gloss. interlinear But it is evident that they meane the outward and corporall death which is contrary to this temporall life for thus the people say Deut. 5.24 Wee have seene this day that God doth talke with man and he liveth 3. Cajetanus doth gather these two reasons of this their feare both that terrible fire which they were afraid to come neere and the thundring voice of God which they could endure no longer to heare and these two reasons are expressed Deut. 5.25 Now therefore why should we dye for this great fire will consume us if wee heare the voice of the Lord our God any more we shall dye 4. But the greatest cause of this their feare was their sinne Conscius homo peccati c. metuit iram Dei c. Man being guilty to himselfe of sinne feareth the wrath of God Simler as Peter said to our blessed Saviour Luk. 5.8 Lord goe from me for I am a sinfull 〈◊〉 QUEST VII How the Lord is said to come unto them and why Vers. 20. GOd is come to prove you 1. God is said to come unto them not that he goeth from place to place but he came unto them by certaine effects his sinnes and wonders and two other wayes beside the Lord commeth by his word and by afflictions and crosses Simler 2. There are three ends of the Lords comming unto them 1. To trie them 2. That his feare may alway be among them 3. That they sinne not All these three arise one from the other probation and triall worketh feare and feare causeth to flee from sinne 3. So although Moses free them from one kinde of servile feare which was the feare of death and destruction yâ—â— he retaineth them still in that profitable kinde of feare whereby they might be kept in awe and obedience still Simler QUEST VIII How the Lord is said to tempt and prove his people Vers. 20. GOd is come to prove you 1. Deus metaphorice non proprie tentat c. God is not said properly but metaphorically â—o tempt as he is said to be angry Quiâ— facit effectum 〈◊〉 c. because he worketh the like effect as he which tempteth that is to cause the feare and obedience of the people to appeare Cajetan 2. God tempteth the Devill tempteth and man is said to tempt God is not said to prove or try for his owne knowledge and experience Cum omnia Deus videat priusquam 〈◊〉 seeing God knoweth all things before they are done Chrysost. hom 41. in Ioanu But God trieth and proveth Vt nos manifestemur aliis that we should be manifest to others as Abrahams obedience was made knowne to all in that he refused not to sacrifice his sonne vel nobis ipsis or to our selves as the Israelites were tempted in the wildernesse that it might be knowne what was in their heart Deut. 8.2 Tostat. Satan tempteth quia evertere â—ititur because he goeth about to supplant and overthrow us as hee tempted Iob. Home aliquando tentat ut probat aliquando ut rapiat Man sometime tempteth to prove sometime to catch as the Scribes and Pharisies tempted Christ to entangle him Ambros. in 2 Cor. 13. QUEST IX Why the people stood afarre off and where Vers. 21. SO the people stood afarre off 1. Cajetanus thinketh that the people returned not to their tents but stood a little from the mountaine and continued in the place whither they fled before vers 18. Tostat. 2. But it is evident Deut. 5.30 that they were bidden to goe unto their tents Iun. For as Moses went up neerer unto the presence of God so the people went still further backward unto their tents being so commanded of the Lord. 3. The mysticall signification hereof is that our sinnes doe make us stand aloofe off from God untill wee be reconciled by a Mediatour whereof Moses was a type and figure here Simler QUEST X. How Moses is said to draw neere to the darknesse BVt Moses drew neere unto the darknesse c. 1. Moses was in the darknesse before for all the hill was covered with smoake but he was not in that darknesse wherein the Lord was Vbi expressiora signa fiâ—â—ant quibus
the hurt voluntarily or involuntarily but onely ut tantum reddatur pro tanto that so much be rendred for so much but it is not just that if one did hurt another against his will that the like hurt of purpose should be done to him againe Tostat. 2. But these objections may easily bee removed For first this law of retalion must be understood with two reservations that it is given de nocumentis personalibus concerning hurt done unto mens persons but it is otherwise in nocumentis rerum in the damage of ones things or substance for in that case not like is to be rendred for like but at the least double for one sometime more chap. 22.4 The other exception is that these personall wrongs are understood to be personarum non qualificatarum of persons not qualified but of common and ordinarie persons as is evident by the former law vers 15. that he which did smite his father and mother should not be smitten againe but was to die for it Cajetan Secondly this law of retalion must necessarily bee expounded of voluntarie and wilfull hurts for if hee that killed a man against his will was not to bee killed againe vers 13. so neither was hee which had done any hurt unwittingly to his neighbour in any of his parts or members to receive the like againe 3. This law then whatsoever can be objected to the contrarie was most equall those times considered 1. Lex talionis permissa est duro populo c. This law of retalion was permitted unto that hard people Sed charitas fidelium mitigatrix est hujus legis The charitie of the faithfull and beleevers doth mitigate the severitie of this law which teacheth them not to seeke revenge Lippoman 2 And Augustine further sheweth the reason of this law that it was made to moderate the unreasonable desire of men in seeking revenge Nonne videmus homines leviter laesos moliri caedem c. for doe we not see men being but a little hurt to goe about to kill to thirst for bloud c. therefore this law An eye for an eye c. non â—omes sed limes furoris est c. is not the kindler but the limiter of rage and revenge Lib. 12. contr Faust. cap. 25. 4. But whereas our blessed Saviour Matth. 5.39 having repeated this law addeth But I say unto you resist not evill c. he doth not abrogate this law but onely freeth it from the corrupt interpretations of the Jewes who hereby tooke unto themselves great libertie in following and fostering private revenge Our blessed Saviour therefore sheweth that privat men should not seeke to revenge their owne wrongs noâ— arrogate unto themselves that power which belongeth to the Magistrate who if hee did not right their wrongs they ought with patience rather to beare them than to bee Judges and revengers in their owne case Marbach QUEST LXI Of the servants freedome for the losse of an eye or tooth Vers. 26. IF a man smite his servant c. 1. This law is to bee understood of such servants as were not Hebrewes as may appeare vâ—â—s 20. for they were not to use the Hebrew servants so cruelly Levit. 25.38 Tostatus thinketh that if an Hebrew servant received a maime hee was not onely to bee set at libertie for his maime but also some other recompence was to be made beside because hee was to goe out free simply in the seventh yeere But I rather herein subscribe to Lyranus that in this case the former law of retalion was to take place if an Hebrew servant lost either an eye or tooth at his masters hand So also Iunius 2. If either one servant did maime another or a free man anothers servant Tostatus thinketh that in this case the smiter was to buy out his service that was maimed and if he were not able then hee was to serve in his place and this generall rule hee giveth that a quocunque servus percutiatur debet effici liber of whomsoever the servant was smitten hee was to bee made free His reason is because another had not more privilege than the servants master if then he was to bee set at libertie if his master smote him and maimed him much more if another did it Contra. This law onely containeth an exception concerning the master in all other the former law was to stand in force an eye for an eye c. which was no privilege for the stranger more than for the master but a greater punishment the master is privileged and exempted from the law of retalion for if the master should have lost a limme or member for his servant there would never have beene any agreement or accord betweene them afterward Marbach And therefore the law provideth that which was lesse grievous to the master and more beneficiall for the servant that he should have his freedome for his maime Simler Privandi enim sunt dominatu tanquam indigni For they were to bee deprived of their mastership and government as unworthy that could use it no more moderatly Gallas 3. There are foure kinds of smiting 1. When death followed whereof the law is set downe before vers 20. 2. If any limme were perished 3. If a wound were made and bloud followed 4. When no skin was broken but onely the blewnesse of the stripe seene for these two last there was no punishment appointed for the master but onely for the two first the one is provided for before vers 20. the second here Tostat. 4. By these two parts of the eye and tooth here expressed all other parts which might be in like manner blemished are signified Simler Lyranus out of R. Salomon nameth these parts for the which if they were perished the servant was to goe out free the ten fingers the ten toes the eares eyes nose and secret parts And why not also the hands and armes feet and legges as before in part is set downe in the law of retalion vers 24. 5. Procopius and Rabanus doe make this mysticall sense of this law by the eye they understand the minde by the tooth discretionem per quam subtiliter sententias Scripturarum comminuit the discerning whereby one divideth the sentences of Scripture if any doe corrupt the judgement of his servant in matters of religion he must leave such a master and go where he may be better taught But where the literall meaning is plaine such mysticall applications are superfluous QUEST LXII What manner of smiting and goaring of a beast is here understood Vers. 28. IF an oxe goare c. 1. One kinde is put for all à parte totum intelligendum est One kinde of beast is named for the rest what beast soever is hurtfull unto man must thus bee served Augustin qu. 8. in Exod. So also Lyranus And this is agreeable to that law Gen. 9 5. At the hand of every beast will I require your bloud Gallas But the oxe is specially mentioned because the Hebrewes were most
among souldiers and robbing by the high way where ones life is put in danger All these kindes being more than simple thefts may receive the sentence of death by Moses Law and Magistrates herein may with a good conscience execute the rigour of the Law upon such violent outragious impudent wanton and incorrigible thefts But they are wisely to consider every circumstance and the occasion that draweth one to steale whether he doe it of necessity to releeve his hungry soule or of an evill custome and obstinate minde to maintaine his lewd and unthrifty life In the first case it seemeth to be too sharpe to take away ones life unlesse he be such an one as will take no warning but continueth hardened in his sinne And so for simple and single theft only except it be in stealing of men unlesse it be aggravated by other circumstances concurring 〈◊〉 violence rapine obstinacie custome in sinne and such like neither the Law of Moses prescribeth punishment of death nor yet is it practised by our Lawes which in such cases intend favour by allowing the privilege of the booke See before p. 6. QUEST IV. Why the theefe breaking up might be killed Vers. 6. IF a theefe be found breaking up c. 1. R. Salomon thinketh that this Law which alloweth the theefe found breaking up an house to be slaine is understood not only of theeves that breake in by night but by day also and that clause which followeth When the Sunne riseth upon him they interpret metaphorically that if it be evident and manifest as the light that the theefe came not only to steale but to kill that whether by day or night he may be killed So also the Chalde Interpreter seemeth to follow the same sense Si oculus testium vidit eum If the eye of witnesses saw him that is if it were evident that he came not only as a theefe but to assault Contra. Though this be true that a man might defend himselfe even by day against him that assaulted his life yet this is not the meaning here the words of the Law are literally not metaphorically to be understood 2. The reason of this difference betweene a night theefe and a day theefe is because in the night breaking in it is not knowne whether he came to steale only or to murther but in the day it may easily appeare by his armour and weapons Tostat. Simler Beside in the day he may call for helpe against the theefe which cannot be so well done in the night when he is left without all other remedy but his owne defence Galas Marbach And in the day he may have witnesses of his theft and so convent him before the Magistrate Lippom. 3. The Romane Lawes allow not onely to kill a night theefe but a day theefe also si se tel◠defenderit if he defend himselfe by a weapon Moses Law much disagreeth not for though he that commeth only as a theefe in the day time is not to be killed but to make restitution only yet if he come with weapons as having a murtherers intent now he may be repelled by force even as a night theefe may not now as a theefe but as one which commeth to assault and murther Iunius QUEST V. How it is made lawfull for a private man to kill a theefe Vers. 2. ANd be smitten that he dye no bloud shall be imputed 1. Cajetanus here observeth that this Law simply alloweth not to kill the theefe but if a man smite him in his owne defence not intending to kill him that in this case he shall be free Percussio fuit intenta mors autem per accidens sequnta c. He intended only to smite him but death followed accidentally upon such smiting so also Simler Non probat ut animo occidendi feriatur This Law alloweth not that he should be stricken with a minde to kill him sed indulget affectui c. but it beareth with a mans sudden passion if in defence of himselfe it so fall out that he be killed 2. But this Law seemeth not only to permit one to smite a night theefe but directly to kill him also so it be not with a desire to kill him where he may otherwise escape but to defend him and his from violence which he cannot doe unlesse the theefe be killed Borrh. 3. For seeing both the Law of nature and other Civill lawes doe allow a man to defend himselfe now when the Lawes doe arme a man they seeme publicam personam imponere to impose upon him a publike person so that now he smiteth not as a private man but by authority of the Law and in this case he is tanquam minister vindex Dei as the minister and revenger of God so that he doe it not of a lust and raging desire to be revenged but intending to use a lawfull defence in the safegard of his owne life Gallas And the case is here all one as if a man being set upon by the high way should kill him that maketh the assault upon him Marbach QUEST VI. After what manner the theefe was to be sold. Vers. 3. HE should be sold for his theft c. 1. So was also the Law among the Romans that the debter should be given up in bonds unto his creditor Whereupon Cato was wont to say Fures privates in nexu compedibus vivere publicos in aur◠purpura c. That private theeves lived in chaines and fetters but the publike in gold and purple c. But this custome because it seemed very hard was abrogated by the Law of Arcadius and Honorius Gallas 2. But here it must be considered whether the theefe were an Hebrew or a stranger if an Hebrew how great soever the debt were for his theft he could be but sold over for six yeeres for all Hebrew servants were to goe out free the seventh And as the theft was valued so should he serve more yeeres or fewer But if he were a stranger he might be sold over to serve all his life if the value of the theft were great if it were but small he was but to be sold to serve so many yeeres as might suffice to recompence the theft Tostat. QUEST VII Why the theefe is only punished double with whom the thing stollen is found Vers. 4. HE shall restore double 1. That is one beside that he stole because that is found in his hand which is stollen and so restored Iun. And so must the five oxen be taken which the theefe must make good five with that which was stollen Lippom. 2. Now the reasons why when the thing stollen is found only double must be restored and five or foure-fold when it was killed or sold are these 1. Because he seemeth to be the more cunning theefe when the thing stollen cannot be found 2. Adhuc difficilior ratio in investigando and it is harder to finde out the theft and therefore he is worthy to be more punished Simler 3. Potest haberi
outward meanes it is but to colour their devillish practice and inchantments whereby they worke and not by the vertue or operation of such herbs therefore it was well decreed in the Matiscane Councell as it is cited in the Decrees Nec in collectionibus herbarum quae medicinales sunt observationes aliquaâ— licet attendere c. In the collection of herbs which are of themselves medicinall it is not lawfull to use any other superstitious observations Now on the contrarie it shall appeare that witches and other of that sort are worthie of punishment by death and that they are not by any meanes to bee tolerated in a Commonwealth 1. They are manifest transgressors against the first Table and every precept thereof for they doe combine themselves with Satan and forsake their faith and so make them other gods beside the Lord they also invent superstitious rites and ceremonies images figures and pictures which the devill hath taught them to worship him by and beside they prophane and abuse the holy name and titles of God in their superstitious invocations and inchantments And they appoint certaine holy daies solemnities and assemblies among themselves as the Lord hath appointed the Sabbath for his owne worship And thus they apparently violate every precept of the first Table 2. They are also enemies to the Commonwealth full of mischiefe practising their malice upon men and beasts and therefore the Civill law Propter magnitudinem scelerum maleficos appellat Because of the greatnesse of their mischievous practices calleth them Evill or Wicked doers They are manifest murtherers assaulting the life of Christian people where God permitteth by all devillish meanes and thus the second Table likewise is by them violated and perverted Gallas 3. They also are perverters of their children and seducers of others and so cause this mischiefe to spread further and to be transmitted over unto posteritie 4. Further if divine and humane lawes condemne all filthie societie and companie with beasts much more horrible and abominable is al confederacie and league made with devils and uncleane spirits Simler 5. Thomas touching this error that some should say Quod maleficium nihil erat in mundo c. That witchcraft was nothing in the world but in the opinion of men addeth Procedit haec opinio ex radice infidelitatis That this opinion proceedeth from the root of infidelitie because they doe not beleeve that there are any devils but only in the estimation of the people c. But we are taught by the Scriptures that the Angels fell from heaven and became devils by whom witches and Sorcerers worke 6. And this is sufficient to convince these men of error because the law of Moses judgeth the sinne of witchcraft worthy of death which they must 〈◊〉 â—â—cuse of 〈◊〉 if witchcraft were so small an offence and consisted but in opinion only And the Imperiall lawes herein doe concurre also with the Divine law which calleth Ars 〈…〉 The Mathematicall it meaneth Magicall science damnable and it decreeth thus 〈…〉 sunt Soothsayers and Diviners are to be burned Nec â—rs ista disâ—i nec dâ—ceâ—t debet This art must neither be learned nor taught yea by the Civill law he which consulted with Soothsayers 〈…〉 shall be punished by the sword QUEST XXXIII Of the 〈◊〉 stone of 〈…〉 Vers. 19. WHosoever lieth with a beast 〈◊〉 Prâ—opins and the 〈…〉 doe understand this of a beastly and bruâ—â—sh man with whom it is dangerous to converse and by death they understand here eternall death But this were to 〈◊〉 these grosse and unnaturall sinnes which here are condemned and these civill politicke lawes are literally to be understood 2. Therefore this law meeteth with that most unnaturall and monstrous sin of more than beastly lust 〈◊〉 this one kind also comprehending all other outragious lusts 〈◊〉 against nature as 〈◊〉 18.22 and 20.15 〈◊〉 3. And there are two sinnes specially against nature either when non servitus 〈◊〉 speciâ—â— the due kind is not kept as when the filthy company of beasts is desired Nature only having ordained the generation of mankinde to be with man the other is when non servatur debitâ—s sermo the due sex is not kept as when man with man worketh â—ilahinesse which was the sin of Sodome Thomas 4. And these are the reasons why such wicked persons should be put to death without all mercy 1. 〈◊〉 latur talibus flâ—giriâ—â— societ 〈◊〉 illa qua cum Deo noâ—â—s esse debet c. By such hainouâ— sins that societie 〈◊〉 violated which ought to be betweene us and God seeing Nature it selfe whereof God is the Author is polluted with such perverse lusts c. 2. Such wicked and vile persons shew themselves worse than bruâ—â— beasts qua coitu naturali contenta sunt which are content with naturall copulation Calvin and goe not out of their kind 3. Serit semen ubi aut nihil nâ—scitur 〈…〉 contrarâ—â—m c. Such soweth seed where either nothing at all is ingendred or a monster contrarie to nature Pelarg. 5. Not only the man or woman committing this filthinesse but the beast also wherewith it is perpetrated was to be put to death Levit. 20.15 both for the detestation of the fact and lâ—st any other by thâ—â— evill example should attempt to doe the like with that beast Lyran. QUEST XXXIV The reasons why mâ—n are given over to unnaturall lust 1. THis bestiall sin may be committed two waies either indirectly when one not at the first intending any such filthy act but being inflamed with lust ad coitum simplicâ—ter simply unto that carnall act because it cannot be satisfied as he would seeketh to have it satisfied howsoever or else directly at the first there is a wicked inclination unto this bestialitie 2. Tostatus giveth three reasons of it why some men are caried into these unnaturall lusts 1. Their vile corrupt nature which is procured by the evill disposition of the country as in Aethiopia and Lybia and toward the poles in the remote countries monstrous shapes and formes are found which are the fruits of such unnaturall lusts 2. Some grow bestiall by frensie and madnes and other distemperatures of the braine 3. Some by an evill use and custome as it seemeth the Sodomites even from their childhood were exercised in those acts of filthines As these reasons may be yeelded of the unnaturall appetite of men which feed of raw flesh yea of the flesh of men as bruit beasts so also of unnaturall lust Tostat. qu. 14.15.3 But a better reason may be given than all these for these unnaturall and beastly lusts are the traits of Idolatry and false worship as here immediately it followeth that they should not offer unto any other gods And Saint Paul sheweth that the Gentiles after they had corrupted the true worship of God were given over unto their owne hearts desire Rom. 1. as the Canaanites haâ—ing not the true worship of God defiled themselves
with these abominations for the which the Lord cast them out Levit. 18.24 Simler QUEST XXXV What is meant by sacrificing to other gods 〈…〉 hearing that the two tribes and an halfe beyond Jordan had erected them an Altar they assembled themselves together against them as jealous lest they purposed to bring in a new worship of God Tostat. 5. And not onely they which committed Idolatrie themselves but they which perswaded others were to be put to death Deut. 13.6 7. QUEST XXXVI Whether Idolatrie now is to be punished by death Vers. 20. SHall be slaine 1. The word is charam that simply signifieth not to cut off but to destroy as an anathema thing accursed and bequeathed to destruction Iun. Pelarg. 2. The Interlinearie Glosse expoundeth it of excommunication and of eternall death but both the practise of those times and the like punishment here â—nflicted upon other capitall crimes sheweth that it must be understood of the losse of the temporall life though beside without their great repentance Idolaters deserve also everlasting death Rev. 22.8 3. Some object that now Idolatrie is not to be punished by death but that such rather that are seduced should be instructed in the true worship of God and in the times of the Gospell it is fit more clemencie and mercie should be shewed than under the rigour of the law Answ. 1. Though Idolaters are to be instructed to reforme their error for the salvation of their soules yet this letteth not but that for so great impietie and for the example of others they should worthily suffer the paines of death 2. And now under the Gospel seeing robberie against the common peace and â—reason against the life and safetie of the Prince and State are judged worthy of death Qui majestatem Dei 〈◊〉 dissime violavit tam leve facinus admisisse putabitur shall he which violateth the Majestie of God most impiously be thought to commit so small an offence Gallas 4. But although as Osiander saith the Magistrate non gladio in idololatriam vindicare teneatur be not now bound to take revenge of Idolatrie by the sword for some difference there is betweene Pagane idolatrie and Popish superstitious Imagerie the one being an absolute deniall of all Christianitie the other a mixing therewith of superstitious vanitie yet by the equitie of this Judiciall law which serveth for the strengthening of a morall precept the like sin of idolatrie may justly receive the like punishment As Cyprian repeating that law Deut. 13.12 Si audieris in una ex civitatibus c. If thou hearest of any of the cities c. that are drawne away to serve other gods that such a city should be destroyed thus further inferreth cujus praecepti memor Mattathias which precept Mattathias remembring killed him that approached to the idolatrous Altar to sacrifice c. Then he further addeth Quod si ante adventum Christi circa Deum colendum et idola spernendâ— haec pracepta servata sunt c. Now if these precepts concerning the worship of God and despising of Idols were kept before the comming of Christ quanto magis post adventum Christi servanda sunt How much more ought they to be kept after the comming of Christ seeing he hath not onely exhorted us in words but in deeds Augustine likewise shewing a difference betweene the schisme of the Donatists and Pagane idolatrie thus concludeth Quis vestrum non laudat leges c. Which of you doth not commend the lawes given by the Emperours against the sacrifices of the Pagans illius quippe impietatis capitale supplicium est c. for the punishment of that impietie is capitall 5. R. Salomon thinketh that if a Jew did sweep an Idol Temple velornaret vel alia similia faceret quae sunt praambula c. or adorne it onely and doe other things which are but preambles to Idolatrie he was not to be punished by death but some other wayes Ex Lyrano But if enticing in words to idolatrie were judged worthy of death Deut. 17.5 much more to entice and draw by fact and example as in adorning and beautifying the Temples of Idols QUEST XXXVII Why idolatrie is judged worthy of death NOw the reasons why idolatry was held by Moses law to be worthy of death were these 1. Quia is cultus diabolo exhibetur qui idolorum author est Because that idolatrous worship is giuen unto the devill who is the author of Idols Gallas 2. Aequum est vita privari eos c. It is just that they should be deprived of life which forsake God the author and fountaine of life Simler To leave the worship of God who is the author of life and to worship the devill the author of death and destruction mille mortibus c doth shew himselfe to be worthy of a thousand deaths Gallas 3. Though euery transgression of the law be in some sort a breach of Gods covenant yet idolatry more specially is said to be a transgression of the covenant of God Deut. 17.2 Because men apparently and professedly thereby forsake the profession solemnely made of their service and obedience vnto the Lord Simler 4. And this severe punishment the Lord appointeth for idolatrie quia inter Aegyptios idololatria assiâ—everant because the Israelites had accustomed themselves unto idolatry among the Egyptians in so much that they Moses yet living set up a golden calfe to worship Simler 5. Because of the ready inclination and propension of mans nature unto idolatry it was fit that it should by some severe punishment be restrained Calvin 6. And two things there are which doe exaggerate the nature of a sinne and aggravate the punishment thereof Res in quibâ—s committitur is in quos committitur c. The things wherein they are commited and they against whom they are committed Borrh. Both which concurre here in the sinne of apostasie and idolatrie For what mattâ—â— can be of greater moment than the service and worship of God and what sin more grievous than that which is committed against God QUEST XXXVIII Of kindnesse how to be shewed toward strangers and why Vers. 21. THou shalt not doe injury to a stranger 1. There are two reasone why men are apt to doe wrong unto strangers a both because they are not allied by affinity or consanguinity and therefore no naturall affection is commonly shewed toward them because they are destitute of friends and patrons and therefore lye more open to wrong Tostatus 2. The stranger must neither bee injured in word nor wronged in deed Simler Neither secretly by fraud nor openly by violence neither must they be hindred by any private man nor publikely prejudiced by lawes made against them Tostat. And it is not enough not to doe them wrong but we must help them and doe them what good we can Gallas 3. And this reason is added because they were strangers in Egypt they did feele by experience what it was to use strangers hardly that by
their own experience they might learne to have compassion on others Simler For the law of nature teacheth not to doe that unto another which we would not have offered to our selves Cajetan They in Egypt would not have had the Egyptians to deale so hardly with them and God punished the Egyptians for their sakes let them take heed then by those judgements which â—ell upon the Egyptians lest they bee punished in like manner for afflicting strangers Simler 4. Other reasons beside may bee added as that strangers as well as they were created according to Gods image and they have the same common father and let them remember the uncertaintie of mans condition Qua variis casibus est exposita c. which is exposed to divers chances they doe not know how soone they may bee driven to sojourne in a strange countrey Marbach 5. The evill entreating of strangers was odious even by the light of nature among the heathen Plato affirmeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that God is a revenger of wrongs and injuries done unto strangers in so much as those cities were famous which were kinde to strangers as the Athenians the Lucari Egineta which were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lovers of strangers And they were noted of infamy that used strangers hardly as the Lacedemonians with others Galass QUEST XXXIX Why widowes and orphans are not to be oppressed Vers. 22. YEe shall not trouble any widow 1. As the former law enjoyned pity and commiseration to be shewed toward strangers that were in misery so this provideth for such as are in misery being not strangers as Widowes and orphans Tostat. 2. And although none at all are to be wronged and afflicted yet these especially must not bee hurt Quia defensorem non habent Because they have none to defend them Chrysost. Carâ—â—do patre seâ— marito c. The one wanteth a father the other an husband Cajetan 3. The Lord here threatneth that he will be revenged of such as oppresse the widow and fatherlesse and three punishments are threatned they shall be smitten with the sword and the other two are sequels hereof their wives shall become widows and their children fatherlesse Tostat. 4. Which punishments are procured by these degrees the widowes and fatherlesse being oppressed doe cry unto God for prayer made in time of affliction is most fervent then though men regard not their teares and prayers yet God will Pellican And his anger will wax hot against them because they oppresse those whom God favoureth and loveth as wee use to bee angry with those which hurt either our selves or our friends whom we love Borrh. QUEST XL. How and by what meanes prayers are made effectuall Vers. 23. SO hee call and cry unto mee c. Divers causes and occasions there are set forth in Scripture which doe procure the exaudition and hearing of our prayers 1. When two consent together and offer up their prayers with one accord their voyce is heard Matth. 18.19 2. Prayer made in faith is effectuall as the Apostle saith The Prayer of Faith shall save the sicke 3. Continuance and perseverance in prayer is availeable Luk. 11.8 Because of his importunity he would arise and give him as many as he needed 4. Prayer joyned with almes and deeds of charity is so much the more respected with God Act. 10.4 Thy prayers and thy almes are come up in remembrance before God 5. Fasting joyned with prayer maketh it more fervent Matth. 17.21 This kind cannot goe out but by prayer and fasting 6. And the greatnesse of affliction Psal. 118.5 I called upon the Lord in trouble and he heard mee As in this place the Lord heareth the cry of the widowes and fatherlesse that call unto him Lippom. ex collationibus Patrum And here they cry Non tantum sono vocis quantum intentione cordis c. Not so much by sound of voice as in the intention and elevation of their hearts Thomas QUEST XLI Why usury is called biting Vers. 25. THou shalt not oppresse him with usury The word nashach whence is derived neshech usury signifieth to bite usury then is called a biting 1. Because as the biting of a Serpent parum percipitur in principio c. is but little felt in the beginning but afterward the whole body is inflamed upon that biting So usury is not felt in the beginning but at the last devorat totam hominis substantiam c. It devoureth all a mans substance So R. Salom. ex Lyran. 2. Or because the usurer tanquam hirudâ—â—â—nem succum sanguinem exugit c. as an horse-leach sucketh out all the juyce and bloud Galass 3. Morsus serpentis non sinit dormâ—re The biting of a serpent will not suffer one to sleepe neither will usury suffer the man that is incumbred therewith to be at rest Simler 4. And it may be so called in respect of the greedy desire of usurers which live upon the poore and eat them up by usury tanquam canis famelicus alios mordendo seipsum pascens as an hungry dog by biting and devouring others feeding himselfe Calvin 5. Usury is called a biting Quia lethaliter moâ—det eos qui ea gravantar because it biteth and gripâ—â—h those to death which are oppressed with it QUEST XLII VVhat usurie is HEnce it is evident that usury is unlawfull But before the severall points belonging to this question can be discussed first we must see what usury is 1. Plus ex mutuâ— velle quam mutuatum sit iniquum est To desire more by lending than was lent is wicked Cajetan He then counteth that usury when any thing is received for loane more than that which was lent 2. Vsura est lucrum quoâ—â—â—nipeâ—â—r soliâ—◠〈…〉 causa Usury is a gaine which is taken only for lending Vrsinus Quicquid 〈…〉 What gaine soever was given beside the principall whereupon it is called in the Hebrew turbith that is increase of the multiplying Calvin 3. After the same manner was usury defined in 〈…〉 as Carthag 3. c. 16. Nullus clericorum amplius accipiat quam cuiquam accomodavit That 〈◊〉 of the Clergy should receive more than he hath lent Augustine thus describeth an usurer Si plus quâ—m 〈◊〉 expectas accipere foenerator es If thou looke to receive more than thou hast given thou art an usurer So also Concil Lateranens Vsury is thus defined Quando ex usurei quae non germinat nullo labore nullo sâ—â—ptâ— nullo periculo lucrum conquiri studetur c. When by the use of a thing which increaseth not gaine is sought without any labour cost or hazard QUEST XLIII Of divers kinds of usuries THere were divers kinds of usury 1. As that which was called Vsura centesima the usury of the hundreth part quae aquiparatur sorti in anno which did rise to bee equall to the principall in one yeare 2. Then there was Dimidia centesimae halfe of the hundreth part 3. Terria
and thereof is called terumah an heave-offering QUEST XXXIII What is here understood by the heave-offering Vers. 28 FOr it is an heave-offering of the children of Israel 1. Some by Terumah which is a speciall name signifying an heave-offering doe understand in generall an oblation Vatarlus But the same word being in the next verse before used in a speciall signification for an heave-offering must bee also so taken here 2. Some doe take it in that speciall sense but then they restraine it only to the shoulder before spoken of which is called the shoulder of the heave-offering Osiander But it is evident in that a perpetuall Law is made for Aaron and his sonnes what part they should have of the peace-offerings and they had as well the shaken breast as the shoulder that was lifted up Levit. 27.34 that this clause must be understood of both those parts before spoken of the breast and the shoulder 3. Some by the heaving here understand only the dividing and separating of these parts which was to be made by the children of Israel So Oleaster and in the same sense the Latine Interpreter translateth primitivae sunt they are the first things that is the principall or best of the offerings of the children of Israel But the word terumah being before used in that speciall signification for an heave-offering should bee also so taken here 4. Therefore this terme terumah heave-offering is given both to the shaken breast and heaved shoulder of the more principall motion for these gifts were first of all by the Priest lifted up and presented before God in the hands of the Priest and in that respect were called an heave-offering Borrh. QUEST XXXIV Of the mysticall application of the shaking to and fro and of the breast and shoulder of the ram given unto the Priests FOr the mysticall application of these rites and ceremonies 1. In that part of the sacrifice was shaken to and fro on every side it signified Deum totius terra esse Dominum that God is Lord of the whole earth Oleaster and beside it betokened that Christi vera victimae merita beneficia c. that the merits and benefits of Christ the true sacrifice should by the preaching of the Gospell be spread abroad into all the world Borrh. But the Hebrewes exposition is fond who would have hereby signified that all men from all parts of the world should come to Jerusalem ibi optimâ aurâ fruituros there to have their health and to enjoy an wholesome aire Ex Oleastro For wee see that not by comming to Jerusalem but in departing from the earthly Jerusalem with the carnall rites thereof by preaching of the Gospell the Gentiles have received health and salvation of their soules which is more precious than the health of the body 2. In that part of the sacrifice was given unto the offerers to eat it sheweth that Christ did not only deliver himselfe unto death for us sed etiam in cibum dare c. but also giveth himselfe to be our meat nourishing us unto eternall life as he saith Ioh. 6.54 My flesh is meat indeed my bloud is drinke indeed c. Marbach 3. And in that the breast and shoulder are given unto the Priest it teacheth as Gregorie well saith Vt quod de sacrificio praecipitur sumere hoc de seipso discat authori immolare That what he is commanded to take of the sacrifice he should learne himselfe to offer unto God quod toto pectore oper◠c. that with all their heart and endevour they should watch upon their office Iun. Vt sint tanquam pectus humeri populi c. To be as the breast of the people to provide and take care for their soules and to bee as their shoulders to beare the burthen of their vocation Simler QUEST XXXV Of the consecrating of Aarons successour in his garments Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments c. 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth in the singular the holy garment but it is in the plurall bigdee garments for there was not one garment but many ten in all which were consecrated for the high Priest 2. The Priests which succeeded Aaron were not to use any other garments but those which Aaron was consecrated in as Eleazar put on Aaron priestly vesture when he was consecrated Priest in his fathers place Numb 20. Lyran. 3. And it is added shall be his sonnes after him whereby the use of these garments is not made generall to all the Priests but onely unto them which should succeed in the priesthood Cajetane 4. And this difference may be observed betweene the consecration of Aaron and his successour that Aaron in his consecration was both consecrated himselfe and his garments with him but his successour only was to be consecrated in those garments which needed not to be consecrated againe unlesse the old garments being old new were to be made in their place and then they were to be consecrated as Aarons priestly garments were at the first Tostat. quaest 13. 5. These garments the high Priest at the time of his consecration was to weare seven dayes together he was not afterward tied necessarily to weare them so long together but as his ministery and service required Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXXVI By whom the high Priests succeeding Aaron were consecrated Vers. 29. TO be consecrate therein 1. There were two high Priests consecrated extraordinarily first Aaron who received his consecration from Moses who was no Priest but only for the time executed that office in Aarons consecration secondly Eleazar was consecrated high Priest his father being yet living which was not afterward seene in any other succeeding high Priest for there could not be two high Priests together But Eleazar was consecrated his father yet living because the time of his death was certainly knowne as the Lord had shewed to Moses and immediatly after Eleazars consecration he died Numb 20 but this could not be knowne in any other high Priest 2. The rest of the high Priests which followed after Moses death were consecrated by the inferiour Priests Tistetus giveth an instance how the Pope at this day is consecrated by the Bishop of Hastia But the Gospell acknowledgeth no such high Priesthood and the Pope doth usurpe that place over other Churches therfore it is nothing to us how an usurper entreth A better instance may be given Act. 13.3 where certaine that were but Prophets and Doctors of the Church do yet lay their hands upon the Apostles Saul and Bernabas and so they did consecrate them to the worke whereunto they were called Therefore by the like example the inferiour Priests might consecrate the high Priest in the old Testament there being no other high Priest to do it QUEST XXXVII Whether Eleazar was consecrated after the manner here prescribed Vers. 30. THat sonne that shall be Priest in his stead c. Which is not understood onely of the next sonne of Aaron which should succeed him which
consecration Vers. 35 THou shalt do thus unto Aaron and to his sonnes c. 1. Some are of opinion that all things here prescribed to bee observed and done were de necessitate consecrationis of the necessitie of the consecration and if any thing were omitted the consecration was voide R. Salomon Lyranus But this is not like that if any thing were neglected in the manner of eating in respect of the place persons or time that their consecration should thereby have been void as Levit 10.17 Aaron being in griefe for the sudden death of Nadab and Abihu forgot the sinne offering which they should have eaten and suffered it to be all burnt and this was the eighth day after their consecration Levit. 9.2 when as yet the anointing was fresh upon them and they did not yet come forth of the doores of the Tabernacle Levit. 10.7 And yet notwithstanding this negligence there was no nullitie of Aarons consecration Tostat. quâ—st 18. 2. Therefore Tostatus opinion is rather to be received that some things were of necessitie in the consecration as the washing anointing of the Priests the putting on of the priestly apparell the sprinkling of themselves and their garments some things were only de solennitate belonging to the solemnitie of the consecration as the seething and eating of it in the holy place and eating it the same day it was a sin to omit any of these but thereby their consecration was not made voide QUEST XLI Why the consecration of the Priests continued seven daies Vers. 35. SEven daies shalt thou consecrate them c. 1. This consecration of the Priests was to continue seven daies together that both the Priests hereby might bee confirmed in their vocation and be assured thereof that they were thereunto appointed of God and that the people also might thereby take better notice that they were set apart by the Lord for that holy function Osiander 2. And further hereby thus much was signified that as the Priests seven daies together were consecrated so we per totum vitae curriculum throughout the whole course of our life should be consecrated and addicted to Gods service Simler Marbach 3. Likewise we are hereby admonished Pontificem continuo proficere non posse repente summum fieri c. that the Priest must daily increase and go forward that he cannot be made perfect at once that many gifts and graces are required in him Lippoman 4. It also sheweth that as their consecration was not perfect before the seventh day so we cannot attaine to perfection in this life Osiander QUEST XLII Whether all the sacrifices of the first day were iterated seven daies together or the sacrifice for sin only Vers. 36. ANd shalt offer everie day a calfe 1. Lyranus thinketh that not onely a calfe for a sinne offering was sacrificed everie day but two rammes also so that seven calves were offered and fourteene rammes in these seven daies So also Simler Borrh. Lippom. Pellican But seeing there is no mention made but only of the sinne offering we have no warrant to imagine any other sacrifice to have been iterated but that as belonging to their consecration 2. Iosephus thinketh yet more that all things were iterated every day which were done upon the first day as the anointing of them and the sprinkling of the Priests themselves and their garments But this is not like that their consecration was iterated it was sufficient for them once to be consecrated and seeing the ramme of consecration was killed onely upon the first day with the bloud whereof they were sprinkled they were so sprinkled but upon the first day 3. Tostatus his opinion is that the calfe which was the sacrifice for sinne and the consecration ramme were offered everie day expresse mention is made of the one and the other is implied in these words seven daies shalt thou fill their hands that is put into their hands part of the peace offering to be shaken to fro before the Lord as is prescribed vers 24. Now the ramme of burnt offering needed not to be daily offered during these seven dayes because there were every day morning and evening a lambe offered for a burnt sacrifice Sic Tostat. But this opinion cannot stand 1. Seeing Moses is bid to take two rams chap. 24.2 it is like that either both of them were â—â—nued every day or none 2. And the filling of their hands signifieth nothing else but the consecrating of their Ministery as is before shewed whereof the hand was the organe and instrument it is not literally to be pressed to signifie the putting of the things offered into their hands 4. Therefore according to the words of the text of all the sacrifices appointed for the first day onely the calfe which is the sinne offering is prescribed to be iterated and the reason is because it was to cleanse and purifie the Altar Levit. 8.15 But only in this sacrifice were the hornes of the Altar touched with bloud and so sanctified which was not done in any of the other sacrifices QUEST XLIII To what end the sinne offering was offered every day of the seven Vers. 36. THou shalt offer every day a calfe c. for reconciliation or to make atonement 1. This reconciliation was not only made for the sinne of the Priests as thinketh Tostatus for the hornes of the Altar were laid on with this bloud whereby it was purified Levit. 8.15 2. Neither yet was this sinne offering prescribed only ad expiandum Altare to cleanse the Altar as thinketh Osiander Calvin For he had said before seven dayes shalt thou consecrate them that is the Priests and then it followeth and shalt offer every day c. so that this daily offering for the space of seven dayes belonged unto the consecration of the Priests 3. Therefore the end of this sacrifice for sinne was both to make atonement for Aaron and his sonnes as also to purifie and cleanse the Altar Iunius QUEST XLIV How the Altar was cleansed and why Vers. 36. ANd thou shalt cleanse the Altar 1. After the consecration of the Priests is set forth their Ministery and service both at the Altar of burnt offering and in the golden altar in the next Chapter Here three things are declared concerning the Altar of burnt offering 1. How it should bee purified 2. What should bee offered thereon 3. The profit and benefit that should come thereby the Lord would there come unto them and speake with them vers 42. and dwell among them vers 45. Lyranus 2. Two things are required to the purifying of the Altar it must first be cleansed not that it was polluted of it selfe but to shew that in respect of man omnia corruptione naturae profana ob peccatum c. that all things by the corruption of our nature are profane because of sinne Gallas Marbach As also it was not only cleansed but sanctified and set apart for holy uses that it should not be lawfull to offer their sacrifices elsewhere
here is taken for the singular according to the Hebrew phrase Oleaster As so the Lord saith I have made thee Pharaohs god chap. 7.1 where the word is Elohim in the plurall and sometime a word of the plurall number is joyned with an adjective of the singular as Isai. 19.4 I will deliver the Egyptians into the hands adonim kasheh Dominorum duri of Lords hard where the adjective is put in the singular sometime the adjective that is joyned with it is put in the plurall also but the relative in the singular Iosh. 24.19 Elohim kadashim his he is holy gods that is an holy God so likewise sometime Elohim is put with a verbe singular as Gen. 1.1 Bara Elohim creavit Dii God created sometime with a verbe in the plurall as in this place asherjeeben which may goe before us So then Elohim gods in the plurall is here put for the singular Make us a god Tostat. qu. 4. QUEST VIII How the Israelites would have their god to be made to goe before them TO goe before us 1. It is evident by this wherefore they desired a visible god to be made not to that end that they might with greater libertie eat and drinke feast and play before the idoll which they could not doe before the Lord for the Lord did allow them to rejoyce before him in sober and seemely manner Nor yet because they bee like unto other nations to have some visible image to worship but they shew the end thereof that they might have some visible presence to goe before them Tostat. qu. 6. 2. And whereas Moses being absent they might have desired some other guide in his place to direct them they doe not so both because they know none could be given them like unto Moses and if such an one might be found he was subject to the like danger as they imagined Moses to be fallen into they desire rather some visible god to be given unto them Tostat. qu. 8. 3. Neither were they so senselesse to thinke that an idoll made of silver or gold which hath eyes and seeth not eares and heareth not could goe before them 4 And Tostatus conceit is too curious that because they had seene images in Egypt which had as they thought a certaine divine power in them speaking sometimes and making answer unto demands And among the rest the Egyptian God Apis which was like a pide bull did appeare once in a yeare unto them and used to goe before them unto Memphis and all the Egyptians followed after playing upon their harpâ— and other instruments he thinketh that the Israelites desired the like god to bee given them that they might have an image made endued with some divine power to goe before them But they never had seene any image in Egypt made with mens hands to stirre and move and walke before them The Egyptian god Apis was either a very pide pull indeed or the devill in that likenesse therefore they having seene no such president in Egypt it is not like they imagined any such thing 5. Wherefore these Elohim gods which they desire to be made were none other but images as Laban so calleth his little images gods Gen. 31. Gallas This then is the meaning that some image may be made them quae admoneret eos praesentiae divina which should admonish them of the divine presence Osiander And they say in effect but thus much Instituâ— nobis cultum c. Appoint us some kinde of worship that God may be reconciled unto us Vt pergat nos praecedere That he may go forward still before us as he hath begun Ferus So then their meaning is not that the idoll to be made should still goe before them but that God represented and reconciled thereby might goe on still with them QUEST IX Why the people came to Aaron rather than to Hur his fellow governour BUt it will bee here questioned why the people demand this rather of Aaron than of Hur who was joyned with him in the government chap. 24. 1. R. Salom. maketh this the reason because that the people had killed Hur because he resisted them and this he saith was the manner of his death al the people came and spet into his mouth and so choaked him But it is not like if Hur in so good a cause had given his life that it should have beene omitted Phinehes fact in slaying the adulterer and adulteresse is commended and honourable mention is made thereof but Hur had beene more worthie to have beene recorded for not killing but in suffering himselfe rather to bee killed in defence of Gods pure worship Tostat. qu. 3. 2. Neither yet is it to be supposed that Hur was dead for some mention then is like to have beene made of his death being a principall governour and of the peoples lamentation for him 3. Therefore although Hur may bee thought to have yeelded and consented to their motion as well as Aaron as not being a more holy man than hee yet because Aaron was the chiefe and more principall he onely is mentioned Tostat. qu. 3. QUEST X. Whether at this time the Israelites wanted the presence of the cloud FUrther whereas they desire gods to bee made to goe before them it will be here objected that they had the presence of the cloud which went before them and they therefore needed not to have had any other guide 1. Oleaster therefore thinketh that the cloud might at this time be taken out of their fight but this opinion is briefely confuted before quest 4. the cloud did not leave them till they came into the land of Canaan when the manna also ceased Iosh. 5. 2. Some make the blinde curiositie of the people the cause why they regarded not that ordinarie signe of Gods presence but requested some figure and representation of God answerable to their vanitie Calvin So also Chrysostom Adhuc iâ—spicis quod miraris oblitus es largitoris Thou seest daily that which thou wonderest at namely the manna which fell every morning and thou forgettest the giver 3. But this also may bee joyned to the former reason they had staied 40. dayes in a plat and the cloud stirred not they had continued as long in this place about mount Sinai even fortie dayes as they had beene in all the mansion places since their comming out of Egypt and so they might doubt that this cloud should be their direction no longer to goâ— before them into the promised land and therefore they desire another guide QUEST XI Why they say they knew not what was become of Moses Vers. 1. FOr of this Moses c. we know not what is become of him c. 1. R. Salom. thinketh they supposed he had beene dead and that Satan had made such an apparision in the aire as if they had indeed seene a coffin as if Moses had beene dead and his bodie put into it But if they had conceived that Moses were dead they would not have spoken
from God but because he had received a Law from God that idolaters should bee put to death in executing that Law hee might justly say that God commanded it quest 35. But seeing Moses was faithfull in all Gods house we must not thinke that hee would pretend the name of God without Gods speciall warrant yet whether Moses received this commandement from God by revelation or by manifest vision is not expressed Pelarg. The latter is more like as God used to speake to Moses at other times face to face 2. And Moses maketh mention of Gods commandement both to deliver himselfe from all suspition that he did not give this charge of hatred toward the people and in rage Simler As likewise the Levites were encouraged hereby to enterprise this worke which otherwise they would have beene hardly drawne unto Tostatus 3. Certaine rules are given them to observe 1. They must goe to and fro non solum transire jussi sunt they are not only bid to passe thorow but to returne to goe everie way ut in omnes populi partes animadverterent that they should in everie place take punishment of the people Gallas 2. They must go from gate to gate that is thorow the streets and common wayes Non committitur istis ut ingrediantur tentoria It is not permitted them to enter into their tents and houses Cajetan 3. And everie man is commanded to slay his brother c. not that everie one had a brother or kinsman to slay sed ut occidat indifferenter but he must indifferently kill both one and other whom he met that was to be killed not respecting kindred affinitie or acquaintance Tostat. qu. 35. QUEST LXX Whether the Levites did not make some difference among the people as they went and killed Vers. 27. SLay everie man his brother c. 1. Some thinke there was an outward marke of difference made among the people by the which the Levites discerned who were to be killed and who to be spared And here are divers opinions 1. Ab. Ezra with some other Hebrewes thinke that by drinking of the water their faces or bellies did swell that were the chiefe actors in this sinne But then many more should have been killed than 3000. See this conceit overthrowne before quest 59. 2. Gallasius thinketh that by the drinking of the water Moses perceived quibus idolum displiceret who they were which were displeased with this idoll and repented of their sin and who were obstinate by their refusall But it is not like that any of the people trembling now and being afraid at Moses presence durst so publikely and openly shew their contempt 3. Simlerus inclineth to thinke that there were some seditious persons in the camp that went about to make a commotion among the people and that the Levites did slay these 〈…〉 But it is evident vers 35. that they were not slaine 〈…〉 but for the golden Calfe Gallas 2. Some thinke there was no other signe of difference but in the notice and 〈…〉 of the Levites it is probable Minime Levitas latuisse quinam primi esseâ—◠〈…〉 Levites were not ignorant who were the chiefe Captaines of this perverse counsell 〈…〉 beene hard for the Levites who as it is like kept themselves at home and were not present with the people of themselves to know in so great a multitude and in so short a time who were the ring-leaders Cajetan resolveth that the Levites were so directed by God who commanded this to bee done Et qui cunctâ— recte disponit and who rightly disposeth all things so that no innocent man was put to the sword But this needed not to be feared seeing all the people in generall consented in this sinne and few or none of them were innocent 3. Wherefore their opinion is most probable who thinke that seeing all the people were guiltie only of this sinne a few only excepted that the Levites could not doe amisse whomsoever they killed as they met without making any difference that whereas all had sinned it was not unjust if a few were singled out from the rest to pacifie the wrath of God and to terrifie the rest 1. Ambrose giveth this reason Quia melius est pancorum supplicio universos eximi quà m in omnes vindicari It was better by the punishment of a few for all to escape than all to be punished 2. Gregorie Nyssenus saith Omnes sine dispositione punitoâ— that all were punished without any difference quia una omnes admalum conspirantes quasi unus effecti sunt because all of them conspiring together in evill were now but as one c. Like as when one is chastised for his fault Non hoc aut illud affligit membruÌ„ he that beateth him doth not make choice of one part rather than another knowing that wheresoever he is whipped ad totum corpus sensum doloris transiturum that the sense of the griefe will reach to the whole body so was it here 3. Lippoman addeth because all the people were culpable Vt totus populus aliquando punitus videatur That the whole people might seeme to be punished it was more to Gods glorie and the honour of the tribe of Levi Si praceptum 〈◊〉 generaliter factum intelligamus If we understand this precept of Moses generally without any difference to have beene executed 4. Oleaster further so thinketh Omnes occurrentes sine delectu c. That the Levites killed all they met without any choice quemâ—dmodum in aliis punitionibus accidiâ— as it happened in other generall punishments when some were plagued for all 5. Calvin and Simlerus make mention how the like thing was in use among the Romans that if a whole band or company of Souldiers had run away or committed any grievous offence the Emperour would tithe them out and put everie tenth man as he was drawne out by lot to death And thus the Thebean Legion which consisted all of Christians was twice tithed out by that cruell Emperour Maximinus 4. Now the contrarie reasons why some thinke that there was some difference made are these 1. Deus caco turbulento impotu c. God would not have revenge taken in his cause upon a blinâ—e and disordered heat Simler 2. By this meanes it came to passe ut placidâ— totus populus quiesceret that all the people was well pacified when they saw only certaine pestilent men to be taken out of the way Calvin 3. Otherwise if there had beene no such difference made there would have no respect beene had of those which shewed themselves penitent for their sinne Gallas Contra. 1. Here need no disorder or confusion to bee feared seeing all the people were guilty the sword could not light upon any unjustly and in that three thousand onely of six hundred thousand were slaine it sheweth that the Levites executed Moses sentence with great discretion and moderation 2. The people might as well be pacified when they saw a few for examples sake to be punished among
9.20 4. Therefore these may be the causes why Moses prayeth againe 1. The Lord granted before that he would not destroy all the people at once sed 〈◊〉 ex inâ—ervallo vel per partes but whether he would doe it in continuance of time and as it wore by peecemeale hee knew not which he prayeth for here Lippom. 2. And there might be other sinnes as well as this for the which the Lord should be angry with them as Deut. 9.18 he saith he prayed and fasted because of all their sins Tostat. 3. And now he prayeth not only for the turning away or judgements but that the Lord would be againe fully reconciled unto his people and restore them to their former state and condition of favour Simler 4. And he prayeth not only for the pardoning of their temporall punishment but against everlasting death which sinne deserveth Osiander QUEST LXXVIII What booke it was out of the which Moses wisheth to be raced Vers. 32. IF thou wilt not race me out of the booke which thou hast written 1. By this booke R. Salomon understandeth the booke of the Law as Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law hee desireth if the Lord were purposed to destroy the people that his name should not be mentioned in the Law nor he taken to be the Law-giver for to what purpose should he be spoken of as a Law-giver unto that people which was not Contra. But this is not the meaning 1. Because the bookes of the Law were not yet written Moses therefore would not desire to be raced out of a booke which was not 2. Neither would Moses aske that of God which was in his owne power to doe now Moses did write the booke of the Law and he might have left out his owne name if he would 3. Againe Moses setteth against this great benefit the safety of the people the greatest losse which he could have but this had beene no such great losse unto Moses not to have his name remembred in any such written booke 4. Moses here useth a disjunctive speech Doâ— this or else race mee c. but if he meant the racing of his name out of the booke of the Law there had beene no disjunction at all for one had followed upon the other for if Israel had beene destroyed neither should Moses have written the booke of the Law which was only given unto Israel for it had beene in vaine to give Lawes unto a people that were not 5. Moses also speaketh of a booke which God had written now Moses writ the booke of the Law the ten Commandements only were written with Gods hand Tostat. quaest 41. 2. R. Abraham Francus who writeth upon Aben Ezra understandeth the racing out of this booke of the death of the body and he addeth further that there is quaedam rota coelestâ—â— a certaine celestiall wheele wherein are many starres which worke by their influence upon those iâ—â—eriour bodies and by the moving of this wheele death or life is caused so that thus he would interpret Moses speech Cause me by the motion of this wheele to dye But seeing the motion of this wheele which he imagineth is the naturall cause as he supposeth of life and death Moses could not dye naturally before his time came and if now he should have died it had beene not a naturall death but supernaturally caused by God therefore not by the motion of any such wheele Tostat. ibid. 3. Hierom also differeth not much from this former opinion in substance understanding Moses desire of death in this life he wisheth Perire in praesentiam non in perpetnum To perish for the present not for ever But whereas the Lord afterward answereth Moses Whosoever hath sinned will I put out of my booke vers 33. it followeth that they which sinne not that is without repentance are not put out of that booke but all as well the righteous as unrighteous the just and the sinners are subject to this temporall death therefore Moses speaketh not of that 4. Hierom hath beside another opinion for upon that place Psalm 69.28 Let them bee put out of the booke of life neither let them bee written with the righteous he inferreth that God hath two bookes viventium justorum of the living and of the righteous that was the booke of the living In quo ante adventum Dei Prophetae Patriarchae scripti sunt Wherein the Prophets and Patriarkes were written before the comming of God in the flesh the other wherein the faithfull are written whereof our blessed Saviour speaketh Rejoyce because your names are written in the booke of life and of the first Moses saith he speaketh in this place So some doe understand this booke in the same sense with Hierom of the booke of Gods Covenant which hee made with Israel out of the which the Gentiles were excluded of which mention is made Ezech. 13.9 where the Lord saith that the false Prophets shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel So Moses desireth here not to be counted of the family of Israel wherein all the Prophets and Patriarkes were written But if Israel had now perished the booke of Gods Covenant with Israel likewise should have beene no more remembred therefore it had beene superfluous for Moses to desire to be raced out of that booke And againe the booke of the living mentioned in the Psalme is the same with the booke of life spoken of Apocal. 3.5 I will not put his name out of the booke of life In which booke of life not only the Prophets and Patriarkes before Christ but all the faithfull before and since are written 5. Cajetane understandeth it De libro principatuâ— in hoc mundo Of the booke of principality and preeminence in the world for it is decreed with God as in a booke Quod isto vel illi principentur in hac vita That such or such shall beare rule in this life And so Moses desireth to lose his principality and government which the Lord promised him that hee would make of him a great nation c. But whereas they which sinned only are taken out of this booke of life and yet many wicked and evill men are governours in the world it cannot be meant of any such booke or decree of principalitie or government 6. Oleaster by this booke thinketh to be understood the booke of the acts and doings of the righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 But there are many righteous men whose names and acts were not written in that booke which is now thought also to be lost therefore it had beene no great matter for Moses to wish to be put out of that booke 7. Burgensis maketh foure bookes of God 1. One is the booke of life wherein only are written the names of the Elect that are ordained unto life as when souldiers are written in the muster booke which are pressed and appointed for warre 2. That also may be called the booke
also is in the same minde Faciem Dei juxta naturae sua proprietatem nulla videt creatura No creature can see the face of God in the propertie of his owne nature 6. But whereas Iacob saith I have seene God face to face Gen. 32.30 which is here denied unto Moses Thomas Aquinas well interpreteth that place that whereas it is said that Iacob saw God face to face Referendum est non ad ipsam essentiam sed ad figuram in quo representabatur Deus It must be referred not unto the essence of God but unto that figure wherein God was represented c. Otherwise it is not to be doubted but that Moses saw more than Iacob did and there is no question but that this was the most cleere sensible vision of Gods glorie that is to be found in all the old Testament for none of the Fathers saw the Lords back-parts but only Moses Oleast yet neither Iacob there nor Moses here saw the divine essence Nunc majus aliquid prastantius obtinet non tamen ut Deum perfecte videat c. Moses obtained a more excellent thing than Iacob yet not to see God perfectly as he is in himselfe but as the capacitie of humane nature was able to beare Calvin 7. Alcuinus giveth this reason why Moses when it is said the Lord spake with Moses face to face saw not the divine essence for then hee would not have said afterward Ostende mihi teipsum Shew me thy selfe or thy glorie Apparuit ergo ei Deus in ea specie qua voluerat non ipse autem apparuit illi natura propria God therefore appeared unto him in that manner hee would not in his owne nature c. 8. Simlerus addeth further hee saw onely the back-parts of God Non vidit igitur naturam substantiam Therefore he saw not his nature and substance And whereas notwithstanding the Lord is said to have talked with Moses face to face that is only to shew a difference betweene that cleere vision which Moses had and other visions shewed to other Prophets not so cleere Simler 9. Lyranus then here is deceived who affirmeth that though the vision or sight of the divine essence was not now granted to Moses Tamen alias fuit concessa in vita praesenti Yet it was granted at another time in this life present But the reason here used by the Lord that no man can see God and live is generall excluding all men while they live here from the vision of Gods nature and essence And as Tostatus reasoneth Non videtur esse aliud tempus inconvenientius c. There seemeth no time to be more convenient for Moses to see Gods essence in than this when Moses made that request unto God qu. 17. yet Tostatus likewise is deceived who thinketh that Moses at this time did see the divine essence QUEST XLIX Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live Vers. 20. THere shall no man see me and live 1. Gregorie Nyssenus giveth this sense of this place not that the sight of that glorious face should be the cause of death Nam quomodo vitae facies causa mortis esse poterit For how should the face of life be the cause of death to those that approach or come neere unto it But to shew because the divine nature exceedeth all knowledge that he which thinketh God to be any of those things which are seene and knowne vitam non habet hath no life Non est ergo vita quod cognoscitur That then is not life which is seene or knowne and so cannot give life c. Hee maketh then in effect this to be the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live thinke not that which thou seest of one to be God able to give life But the Lord speaketh here not of any inward opinion but of the present sight and contemplation of God which Moses decreed and by face he meaneth not any thing beside himselfe that is seene of him but his essence and nature that which himselfe is no man can see that and live 2. Procopius seemeth to approve this sense that they which live here according to the flesh cannot see God but they may see him Non secundum carnem ambulantes Which walke not according to the flesh But Procopius may answer himselfe by a distinction that there is prima Dei facies the first face of God which is his divine essence which is indeed invisible neâ—ini mortalium visa and never seene of any mortall creature there is secunda Dei facies as second face of God which is his grace and favour which is seene by faith of this sight of God our blessed Saviour speaketh Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God c. But the Lord speaketh here of the sight of his first face which is invisible for Moses lived not according to the flesh and yet he is denied this sight and afterward he is granted to see the back-parts which he could not have seene if he had beene carnall not spirituall 3. Rupertus thinketh that as before the Lord spake unto Moses in the person of the people Pro parte electorum In respect of the elect among them I will cause all my good to goe before thee so he speaketh this pro parte reproborum in regard of the reprobate and wicked among them that they should not see Gods glorie and live because they were appointed to die So Rupertus maketh the force of this speech to consist in the word Then thou canst not see my face that is the wicked and unbeleevers among the people But this exposition cannot stand 1. Because the reason is generall No man shall see me and live no man whatsoeveâ— 2. The emphasis lyeth in the word face for his back-parts it is granted Moses to see 3. And the Lord meaneth here Moses person not in him the person of the people as the whole narration following sheweth how the Lord would put Moses in a cleft of a rocke and cover him with his hand while he passed by c. 4. Another exposition is this Qui ex opposito Deum aspicit non vivet He which doth see Gods face as opposite and comming against him shall not live Discat homo Deum sequi Let a man seeke to follow God c. not as it were to meet God in the face or to oppose himselfe against him for vice is opposite to vertue So also Gregor Nyssen 5. Augustine thus interpreteth No man can see God and live Nemo potest eum in hac vita videre vivens sicuti est No man can see him while he liveth in this life as he is So also Lyranus Vatab. Iun. annot But thâ—n this should onely be a repetition of the same thing Thou canst not see my face for no man living can see my face It better containeth a reason of the Lords former answer why Moses could not see
Gods face and glorie Quia non expediebat because it was not expedient Iun. in Analys quia exitiale foret because it would be to his destruction Calvin 6. Wherefore as Gallasius well noteth Rationem subjungit c. God adjoyneth a reason why Moses would not see Gods face because such is the imbecillitie of mans nature Vt pracelsam ejus splendorem sustinere nequeâ—t that it is not able to sustaine or indure his excellent brightnesse c. This then is set downe as an effect or consequent of the seeing of Gods face that it would so oppresse them and astonish them that they could not live after And that this is the meaning it appeareth both by Iacobs speech that counted it as a singular benefit that he had seene God face to face and yet his life was preserved yet indeed Iacob had not seene the very divine essence at that time So Manoah Sampsons father said to his wife We shall surely die because we have seene God they thought they had seene God whereas it was an Angell onely which they saw But yet by these examples it appeareth how they did understand this saying No man can see God and live Neminem posse citra mortem Deum facie ad faciem videre That no man without perill of death can see God face to face Oleaster Irenaeus also confirmeth this sense out of the new Testament as Iohn saith when he saw that vision Apoc. 1. vers 17. I fell at his feet as dead ut fieret quod scriptum est that it might be fulfilled as it is written No man can see God and live Ambrose well giveth the reason hereof Si Solis radios oculi nostri ferre non possunt c. If our eyes cannot indure the sight of the Sun beames if one creature cannot behold another sine offensione sui without hurt of it selfe how can any fine periculo sui without great danger unto himselfe behold the glistring countenance of his Creator Fulgor ille tantae Majestatis nos in nihilum redigeret The brightnesse of so great a Majestie would bring us to nothing Calvin Simler 7. Tostatus alloweth this sense Immediate ut viderit morietur Whosoever should see Gods face should immediately die after it But he restraineth it onely to the sight of the bodie because the eye could not indure to behold such an excellent object but he saith it cannot be understood of the seeing of the divine essence in the soule for that Non causat aliquam passionem in corpore for the inward and intellectuall sight doth not cause such a passion in the bodie as wherewith the harmonie thereof should be dissolved qu. 18. Contra. 1. As though the soule of man may not be as well oppressed and astonished with an excellent intellectuall object such as is the essence of God as the bodily sight may be with a sensible object 2. And the astonishment of the soule may also worke upon the bodie as we see when the soule is with griefe and care oppressed the bodie also is therewith affected 3. Cajetan hereof thus noteth Quamvis excellens intelligibile non corrumpat intellectum sed confortet illum est tamen illi improportionatum excedit capacitatem illius hoc est opprimere illum Though an excellent intellectuall object doe not corrupt or destroy the understanding but comforteth it yet it is unproportionable to it and exceedeth the capacitie thereof and so doth in a manner oppresse it c. QUEST L. What place this was in the rocke which the Lord here speaketh of Vers. 21. BEhold there is a place by me c. Thou shalt stand upon a rocke c. 1. Cajetan understandeth this place in the rocke in a spirituall sense Moses erecta fixa mente elevatus that Moses as it were lifted up with a setled and upright minde c. should addresse himselfe to this vision 2. Procopius thus understandeth Petra est Christus hac petra est locus apud Deum The rocke is Christ and this rock is that place with God as our blessed Saviour saith He that seeth me seeth my father 3. Augustine will not have it understood of any materiall place Qui enim locus non penes Deum est For what place is there not with God who is every where present Ecclesiam ergo significat He therefore hereby signifieth his Church 4. But it is evident by this whole description that the Lord meaneth the very rocke in Horeb where Moses should be set In rupe qua soleâ— apparere in the rocke where I used to appeare unto thee Vatab. In monte Sinai ubi consuevi tibi loqui In mount Sinai where I use to speake unto thee Lyran. Tostat. So also Chrysostom Vidit Moses sed extra per cavernam in petra Moses also saw God but outwardly in a rocke thorow a cleft 5. Fuit hac petra corporea This was indeed a materiall rocke in a cleft whereof Moses was put but it signifieth the true rocke Christ by whom we attaine to the true knowledge of God QUEST LI. How the Lord is said to cover Moses with his hand Vers. 22. I Will cover thee with my hand c. 1. Gregorius Nyssenus thus expoundeth these words Qui ad Christum pervenit manu Dei tectus est manus autem Dei creatrix omnium rerum virtus He that is come unto Christ is covered as with Gods hand and Gods hand is the power wherewith all things are created but this sense cannot stand for the Lord doth not remove his hand or protection from them which are placed in the true rocke Christ as the Lord is said here to remove his hand from Moses 2. Pelargus understandeth the removing of the hand De collapsione politiae Mosaicae post adventum Christi of the removing and falling of the politike state of Moses common-wealth after the comming of Christ. But the text describeth a thing now presently done 3. Simlerus thinketh it is but a phrase of speech as we use to put our hand before our eyes when we looke upon the Sun Sic oculi Mosis teguntur so Moses eyes are hid that they should not be dazled with Gods glorie So Iunius taketh it to be humanitus dictum to be spoken according to the use of men I will hide thine eyes 4. Tostatus thinketh it was quaedam nubes densa a certaine thicke cloud which covered the hole of the rocke till the Lord passed by quâ—st 19. So also Calvin Dei manus pro caligine accipitur c. The hand of God is taken for a mist and darknesse put before Moses eyes that they might not be intent curiously to looke further than was meet 5. But there is nothing to the contrarie why this may not be added further that this cloud put before Moses eyes might not also have as it were the fashion of an hand Ponam quasi figuram manus mea super te I will put as it were the figure
if it be fervent Iam. 5.16 4. Observ. Spirituall things first to be begged in our prayers Vers. 18. SHew me thy glorie Ferus here giveth this note Moses ut plurimum spiritualia petit Moses doth for the most part aske spirituall things Which teacheth us that in all our requests wee should principally beg those things at the hands of God which concerne our soules as our blessed Saviour saith First seeke the Kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and all these things shall bee ministred unto you 5. Observ. Against the feare of death Vers. 20. NO man shall see me and live Then after death and this life ended wee shall see God Borrhaius hereupon well noteth Quam preciosa res sit mors animalis hominis c. What a precious thing the death of the bodie is which bringeth us to see God as S. Paul saith I desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ Philip. 1.23 Death then of a faithfull man is not to be feared CHAP. XXXIV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth the reconciliation it selfe of the Lord with his people consisting of three parts 1. The signes of this reconciliation going before to vers 8. 2. The substance of the reconciliation it selfe to vers 29. 3. The signes which followed after Moses was come downe 1. There are two signes of this reconciliation The first is externall and visible the preparing of the two tables of stone 1. Commanded to be made by the Lord vers 1. 2. With the manner of Moses comming up and the reverent behaviour of the people in the meane time vers 3. 3. And Moses obedience vers 4. The second is spirituall in the proclayming of the Lords name either shewing his substance Iehovah or his properties mercie toward the righteous or vengeance toward the wicked to vers 7. with the effect Moses humbling of himselfe vers 8. 2. The reconciliation consisteth of Moses humble suite to the Lord vers 9. and the Lords gracious answer wherein the Lord sheweth what he will doe for his people v. 10 11. then what he requireth of them where are propounded first morall lawes concerning the avoiding of idolatrie which are 〈◊〉 in number to vers 17. then ceremoniall which are three 1. Of their anniversarie and weekly feasts namely the Sabbath vers 18 21 22 23. 2. Of their first fruits of their cattell vers 19 20. and of their increase vers 29. 3. Of the manner of their sacrifices not to be offered with leaven vers 26. 3. The signes following are two first the bringing of the second tables with their writing by the Lord and Moses preparation thereunto by his fortie dayes fast vers 28 29. The second is the shining of Moses face where is described 1. The manner thereof vers 29. 2. The effects the astonishment of the people vers 30. 3. The remedie which Moses used which was double the inviting and calling of the people to come unto him vers 31 32. and the covering of his face vers 33. when he put it off when he went in to speake with God vers 34. and when hee put it on when he came out unto the people vers 35. 2. The divers readings Vers. 6. Iehovah Iehovah strong I. Iehovah Iehovah God B.G. cum caeter It seemeth rather to be an appellative than a proper name of the Lord here because of the distinction Rebia over Iehovah which separateth it from the sentence following Vers. 7. Not making the wicked innocent B.G.V.I.S. better than leaving one innocent B. or with whom none is by himselfe innocent L. See the reason hereof quest 11. Vers. 10. Behold I will make a covenant before all the people I will doe mervailes I. better than I will make a covenant before all the people and I will worke B.G. cum cater for there is a distinction at covenant and it is in the Hebrew I will worke not and I will worke Vers. 30. His face shined B.G.A.P. or streamed V. was glorious S. the brightnesse thereof was multiplied C. not cornuta erat was hornie L. See afterward the question upon this verse Vers. 33. When Moses had made an end of comming c. hee put a covering I. or So Moses made an end c. and had put a covering c. G. better than when he had made an end c. he put a covering V.L.S.C. it is better translated in the preterpluperfectense for then Moses had most need in respect of the peoples infirmitie to put a vaile upon his face when he spake unto them See the 51. qu. following 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Wherefore the second tables were given Vers. 1. HEw thee two tables of stone 1. The Lord commandeth two tables of stone to bee prepared that it might bee a signe of his perfect reconciliation with the people in these respects 1. Because by this appeared that the Lord purposed not to destroy them for then he would not have given them a law and this was a signe that God would goe before them and be their guide still because he was their spirituall guide in giving them direction by his law Tostat. qu. 1. 2. And seeing the Arke was appointed to receive and keepe the tables of stone it shewed that the Lord purposed that whatsoever he had before prescribed concerning the making of the Tabernacle should stand Cajetan 3. And that he willeth the like tables in all respects to be made he thereby signifieth that he would have all things to returne to their former state Simler 2. But though God returned in grace unto them yet in that he prepareth not these tables as he did the first but willeth Moses to provide them he would have aliquod pâ—â—na vestigium rostare therein some marks of their punishment to remaine Ac si sanato vulnere manerâ—t â—â—catrix as though the scar remained after the healing of the wound Calvin 3. But the people are not sprinkled againe with bloud as they were at the first as neither now they which fall after Baptisme are baptised againe but it sufficed onely those things to be restored by repentance which were decayed by their transgression Ferus QUEST II. Why the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee HEw thee 1. R. Salomon doth gather hereupon because Moses is bid to hew unto himselfe c. that the Lord shewed a quarrie of Saphir stone whereout Moses hewed the tables and so he is willed to hew unto himselfe two tables of stone that is to his commoditie for Moses he saith became very rich by the fragments that were left in hewing of the tables But seeing no such thing is mentioned in Scripture nor yet by Iosephus who was more ancient than R. Salomon it is rather to be thought to be one of his fables Lyran. and beside they lay an unjust and untrue imputation upon Moses as though he intended and respected his owne profit whereas all his courses shew the contrarie that hee sought still the good
after he had spoken unto them and inquired the cause of their fleeing from him then he covered his face But it is like that the people at the very first sight of Moses were afraid to come neere him and that therby Moses perceiving the reason covered his face And that he had cast the vaile on his face before he began to speake and that the people had fled from him before it is evident because Moses had called them unto him as afraid to come neere 2. Tostatus thinketh that as Moses spake unto the people he sometime uncovered his face that they might see his glory and the more reverence his ministery and sometime he covered it because they were not able continually to behold that brightnesse But it is manifest vers 35. that Moses alwayes kept his face covered till he went in to speake with God 3. Simlerus thinketh that primum aperta facie populum allocutus est at the first time Moses spake unto the people with open face that they might be the more moved and affected with the sight of that glory but after that he used to cover his face But the Apostle sheweth that the people could not behold Moses face for the glory of his countenance c. They did not then behold it first or last while his face shined 4. Some Hebrewes as Lippoman writes doe thinke that Moses spake to God and to the people with uncovered face and at all other times he covered his face but it may be gathered out of the 35. verse that at all times untill Moses went in unto God his face was covered And the difference was in this that Moses uncovered his face before God for there was none to be dazled with that sight but when hee shewed himselfe and spake to the people his face was covered 5. Therefore the truth is this that as soone as Moses perceived by the peoples feare in not comming neere that his face shined he then covered his face and so spake unto the people yet need wee not with Oleaster to transpose the words Hee put a vaile upon his face and so finished to speake unto the people but either wee may reade with Iunius While he had finished to speake unto the people he put a vaile or rather to reade it in the preterpluperfect tense and hee had put a covering upon his face Genevens for as Oleaster reasoneth hee had most need then to put a vaile before his face when he spake unto the people So also Cajetane in speaking unto God his face was uncovered Homines autem alloquebatur facie velaâ—a But he spake unto men with vailed face lest that those shining beames might have hindred their sight QUEST LII What the vailing of Moses face signifieth 6. THe mysticall meaning of this vaile before Moses the Apostle sheweth 1 Corinth 3.13 That the children of Israel should not looke unto the end of that which should be abolished which Augustine understandeth thus Christ is the end of the Law c. Rom. 10.4 Signum erat quia in lege Christum intellecturi non erant It was a signe that they should not understand Christ in the Law 2. And the Apostle also maketh this a propheticall type of the blindnesse of the Jewes unto this day over whose hearts a vaile is still spread in the reading of the Law that they doe not perceive the spirituall sense thereof 3. Origene more generally applieth it that when Moses that is the Scriptures are read velamen super cor eorum there is a vaile over their heart that reade but understand not 4. It signifieth also the vaile of ignorance which is spread upon our hearts by nature which untill it be removed by Christ we cannot understand the truth of God Simler QUEST LIII How long the shining of Moses face continued Vers. 35. THerefore Moses put the covering upon his face c. 1. Some thinke that the glorie of Moses countenance continued no longer than untill he had delivered his message unto the people and declared the Lords commandements unto them But the contrary is convinced out of the text in this place which sheweth that Moses used when he went in to God to uncover his face and when he went out to cover it it seemeth then that more than once or twice Moses did thus And that the shining of his countenance did continue some while after 2. Ambrose saith Quamdiu vixit Moses alloquebatur populum velamen habuit in facie c. As long as Moseâ— lived and spake unto the people he had a covering on his face But Ioshuah after Moses death spake unto them with open face which signified quòd venturus esset verus Iesus that the true Jesus should come who should take away the vaile of their hearts that turned unto him So Ambrose Tostatus would confirme the same by these two reasons 1. Seeing God had given Moses this gift not setting downe any time how long it should continue he would not take it away from him but upon some evill demerite of Moses but he continued in Gods favour so long as he lived 2. Seeing this glory was an honour unto Moses if the Lord had taken it from him it would have beene as great a disgrace and dishonour as it was before an honour Contra. 1. Christ also was transfigured in the mount his face did shine as the Sunne he continued still the beloved Sonne of God yet that glory remained not still in his countenance therefore that argument doth not follow 2. And the ceasing of his glory in Moses was no more disgrace unto him than it was to Christ to have his face shine before his three Apostles in the mount and not afterward when he came downe to the rest of his Disciples 3. That typicall allusion betweene Moses and Ioshuah being not grounded upon the Scripture doth serve only for illustration it proveth not 3. That Moses face then had not his shining brightnesse while he lived it is the more probable opinion upon these reasons 1. Signes were no longer to continue but untill the things signified were confirmed this shining of Moses countenance was a signe of Gods favour and reconciliation with the people this being confirmed and the people thereof perswaded the signe might cease 2. As long as Moses face shined the people were afraid to come neere But afterward they presumed not only to come neere him but Cora Dathan and Abiram resisted him to his face Numb 16.3 It seemeth that then his face shined not 3. The Apostle calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 glory which was to be abolished 2 Cor. 3.7 It was therefore a transient and passing not a permanent glorie 4. Christs glory and shining brightnesse in the mount continued not all his life who was greater than Moses QUEST LIV. Whether Moses face continually shined or only at certaine times BUt it cannot certainly be determined how long Moses held this brightnesse it is like so long till the Tabernacle which he had
was brought not only gold and silver and precious stones but other things of lesse price as rams skins badgers skins and by whom they were offered by the men women and Princes to vers 30. 3. Then the institution of the workmen is expressed 1. Who they were 2. What gifts they were indued with 3. To what end not only to worke themselves but to teach others vers 35. 2. The divers readings Vers. 22. Hookes or buttons earings rings and studded girdles I. better than rings and chaines B. or rings and bracelets G.L.S.C. or rings and aprons A. the ornaments of the nether parts it is not like they offered such the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chumaz which Iunius interpreteth cingula◠bullatas studded girdles here and Numb 31.50 Vers. 34. Both him and Aholiab c. that is God hath called both him and Aholiab Iun. So also the vulgar Latine putteth it in the accusative likewise A.P. better than in the nominative as V.B.G.S.C. For so it hath no grammaticall construction with the precedent sentence 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Why the precept of keeping the Sabbath is so often inculcate Vers. 1. IT shall be unto you the holy Sabbath of rest unto the Lord. 1. Cajetane thinketh that this is the reason why the precept of the Sabbath is here iterated because Moses propositurus ceremonialia being to propound ceremoniall Lawes beginneth with the chiefest of them which is concerning the Sabbath But the preamble vers 1. These are the words which the Lord hath commanded that ye should doe them sheweth that Moses speaketh not only of ceremoniall but morall duties also which were to be done and performed by them Marbach 2. But there are two reasons of this repetition one lest they might thinke that they might intermit the rest of the Sabbath because of the workes of the Sanctuary for the which reason this precept was urged before chap. 31. Iun. Marbach Pelarg. 3. The other reason is because this precept religionis caput totum Dei cultum continet c. doth in a manner containe the head of religion and the whole worship of God because upon the Sabbath they were taught their whole duty toward God therefore the neglect thereof would tend to the ruine and decay of all religion Gallas Simler 4. And this precept is so often inculcate to admonish us Primo omnium Dei regnum quarendum esse That first of all we must seeke the kingdome of God Osiander QUEST II. Whether it were simply forbidden the Israelites to kindle fire upon the Sabbath Vers. 3. YOu shall kindle no fire thorowout all your habitations c. 1. The Hebrewes were so strict in keeping the very letter of this Law that they thought it not lawfull to strike fire out of a stone or iron nor to light a candle but for the sicke nor to put out a fire and if they made a fire to warme them by they were not to kindle it with bellowes but with reed Oleaster And therefore the Jewes used to hire Christians to make their fires upon the Lords day Lippomnn But this their superstition was convinced by their owne practice in the Tabernacle where the Priests did keepe fire on the Lords day upon the Altar which was never to goe out 2. Some of our owne Writers thinke that by this they were forbidden to make a fire ad calefaciendum to warme them by And therefore the man that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath day was stoned to death Gallas But seeing the Sabbath was made for man that is for his good not for his hurt there was no doubt but in extremity of cold for the preservation of their health it was lawfull for them to warme them at the fire the man was put to death for gathering stickes not for kindling of a fire and he did it with an high hand that is of an obstinate minde as may be gathered Numb 15.30 3. Some thinke that only such kindling of fire is forbidden ex quo lucrum sperari posset whereof they made gaine as in furnaces and forges Vatab. But the words are generall that not only in their shops and forges but thorowout all their habitations they should not kindle a fire 4. Therefore I preferre rather Cajetanes opinion that it is not simply forbidden to kindle a fire but relativè ad coquendum with relation to the seething and dressing of their meat which asked much businesse and great preparation they were to prepare their meat the day before Exod. 16.23 which shewed a difference betweene the Sabbath and other festivall dayes wherein it was lawfull for them to dresse their meat as in the Pasch chap. 12.16 5. R. Abraham Aben Ezra did hold it lawfull to kindle a fire upon the Lords day to warme them by though not to dresse their meat whereupon the other Rabbines would have pronounced him an Heretike and they writ a booke against him under the name of the Sabbath as though the Sabbath it selfe had spoken against him But as herein Aben Ezra did hit upon the meaning of the Law yet he was deceived in another point that though it were not lawfull to kindle a fire upon the Sabbath from the rising of the Sunne to the setting thereof yet they might doe it in the night before But they used in the account of their feasts to begin from the evening before as they began the feast of unleavened bread upon the 14. day at even Exod. 16.18 They observed then their feasts according to the naturall day which contained both the day and the night not after the artificiall from Sunne to Sunne Tostat. qu. 1. 6. This precept of not kindling a fire upon the Sabbath must be understood extra casum necessitatis beside the case of necessity Marbach For otherwise to kindle a fire to dresse meat rather than to starve and to comfort the sicke was not forbidden 7. It is added thorowout their habitations that is their private dwellings for otherwise in the Tabernacle they did kindle a fire and doe other bodily workes which concerned the service of God Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST III. Why the Lord would have his Temple built sumptuously Vers. 5. LEt him bring an offering to the Lord gold silver c. 1. Moses to shew his faithfulnesse in executing Gods commandement neither adding thereto nor taking any thing therefrom repeateth in these chapters this and the rest following almost the same things verbatim which were prescribed before to be made concerning the Tabernacle chap. 25 26 27 28. Gallas And therefore the Reader is to be referred to the large treatises and questions there handled if he desireth in any thing to be satisfied 2. The people then had both silver and gold and other jewels which they brought out of Egypt with them neither had they bestowed all upon the golden Calfe 3. It so seemed good unto God that his Tabernacle should be builded sumptuously ne veri Dei cultus esset inferior gentilium cultu that
to take upon him our humane nature So also Osiander Marbach For if the Lord had appeared here in any humane forme Moses reason had not beene sufficient dehorting the people from idolatry because they saw no Image in the day that the Lord spake unto them in Horeb Deut. 4.15 For though the Lord had then appeared in any Image yet if he had at this time so shewed himselfe they might have taken occasion thereby to resemble God by some Image therefore neither then nor now did the Lord so appeare Tostat. quaest 13. 4. Neither yet because it is said Vnder his feet c. did they see as the feet of a man as Cajetane thinketh Sub specie Iudicis quasi hominis visus est c. He was seene as a Judge sitting in judgement and so they saw but his feet but this is so said quantum ad situm in respect of the site and placing because the pavement of Saphir was beneath as under the feet and they might imagine the more glorious part of Gods Majesty to be upward Tostatus 5. Neither yet is the meaning Quod clarius cognoverint Deum c. That they only knew the Lord more clearely than the common people Ferus Or as the Septuagint translate they saw only the place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where the Lord stood 6. But the Lord by a bright shining cloud shewed his Majesty and presence as the Chalde Interpreter readeth Viderunt gloriam Dei Israel They saw the glory of the God of Israel and that much more now than when hee appeared in mount Sinai when notwithstanding the people said The Lord hath shewed us his glory and greatnesse Deut. 5.24 Tostat. So also Calvin Forma ipsius Dei nulla describitur sed basis in qua stabat c. There is no forme described of God but the bottome where he stood is said to be like unto Saphir c. QUEST XXII Wherein the place under Gods feet is said to be like to Saphir Vers. 10. AS a pavement or stone-worke of Saphir 1. This place under Gods feet for the colour is resembled unto the precious stone called the Saphir and to the cleare heavens Tostatus thinketh the Saphir to be of a bright reddish colour and that two colours are hereby signified a bright shining red and a blew or azure as in the skie But the Saphir stone is knowne to be of a skie blewish and airy colour as Hierome observeth and one of these similitudes is added to explaine the other Borrhains saith that the fairest Saphirs are full of red golden spots So also Oleaster Which answereth to this description that the pavement or bricke worke for so libnath signifieth either bricke or stone is said to be of Saphir Tostatus further thinketh that it is compared unto caelum stellatum the starrie skie but QUEST XXIII In what sense the Lord is said not to lay his hand 〈…〉 Vers. 11. VPon the Nobles c. he laid not his hand The laying of the hand is taken in Scripture 〈◊〉 threefold sense 1. The hand of God was said to be upon the Prophets when the Spirit of God came upon them And so Ab. Ezra understandeth this text Non porrexit illis manum He did not 〈◊〉 his hand unto them He gave them not the Spirit of Prophecie as he did to Moses they did not see God so cleerely as Moses did But the wordâ— are to be joyned together thus That although they sâ—â— God yet his hand was not upon them and then no such sense can be gathered Calvin 2. The laying on of the hand signifieth also to hide as God is said to have laid his hand upon Moses as he passed by Exod. 33. And so they make the meaning to be this that God did not hide himselfe to 〈◊〉 which were farre off as the Latine text is that is hee shewed himselfe also to the people in the 〈◊〉 Lyranus Gloss. 〈◊〉 Tostatus But the word is 〈◊〉 which signifieth to separate the text then meaneth those 70. Elders which Moses had selected and separated from the rest Iun. Lippom. Or 〈◊〉 may be derived of etâ—â—l which signifieth neare as Gen. 41.3 They 〈◊〉 neere or by the 〈◊〉 and so in this place iâ— may betoken those which were neere unto God namely the 70. Elders who came neerer than the rest of the people Oleaster 3. There is also a third signification of this phrase to lay the hand is to sinite or punish contrarie whereto is that phrase To take his hand from one 1 Sam. 6.5 that is to leave smiting or punishing So thâ—n the meaning here is Non 〈…〉 Hee sent not upon them his hurting hand Cajetaâ—â— Non 〈…〉 Hee killed them not Lippomanus For it was a received opinion in those dayes that no man could see God and live Oleaster Nihil incommodi senserunt They felt no harme after this Simlerus QUEST XXIV Why they are said to eat and drinke Vers. 11. ANd did eat and drinke c. 1. Rab. Salomon saith that this is added to shew their fault that after they had seene God as though they had not much cared for it they turned them to temporall pleasures in eating and drinking And though God did forbeare them now yet afterward they were punished Nadab and Abâ—hu died in the Tabernacle by fire sent of God Levit 10. and the Elders afterward at the grave of lust Numb 11. Contra. 1. It seemeth that God was not offended with them in this place because he laid not his hand upon them and therefore it is not like that they shewed any such contempt 2. Nadab and Abihu were afterward smitten but it was not for any such fault committed here but for offering strange fire Tostat. qu. 15. 2. Some understand it of their rejoycing as if they had eaten and drunke so the Châ—lde But here is no such note of similitude Quasi 〈◊〉 c. As though they did eat But it is expressed plainly They did eat It is then to bee taken rather historice historically than metaphorice metaphorically Tostatus 3. Ab. Ezra giveth this sense that although they had seene God yet they were not so ravished with it as Moses was that did neither eat nor drinke 40. dayes after but they did eat and drinke afterward 4. Some here by understand the spirituall delight which they conceived which is sometime expressed by eating and drinking as Christ saith to his Disciples in the Gospell That yee may eat and drinke at 〈◊〉 table in my Kingdome Ferus 5. Some referre it to their publike feastes which they made that day in token of their joy They are and dranke in laetitia magna post talem 〈◊〉 in great mirth after such a vision Lyran So also Tostat. Osiander 6. But the proper and true sense is this Salvi integri manserunt They remained sound and in good health Calvin Tanquam omnino incolumis comederunt c. As in perfect health they did eat and drinke they onely escaped not death but
all other kinde of punishment whatsoever Cajetan And this their health is expressed by these actions of life as Hagar argueth her life by another action of life Gen. 16.13 I have seene after him that seeth Iun. So also Gallas Simler 7. Before they were sprinkled with bloud Gods hand was in some sort upon them in terrifying them Whosoever touched the mountaine should die But now after their sprinkling they are cheared and refreshed and are not forbidden the sight of God which signifieth that we onely have accesse unto God by the bloud of Christ Rupertus Ferus QUEST XXV Whether this were a new commandement or the other mentioned vers 1 2. repeated Vers. 12. ANd the Lord said unto Moses c. 1. Some thinke that this is the same commandement repeated which was given unto Moses before vers 1 2. Iun. Tostatus addeth further that when the Lord said to Moses vers 2. Moses himselfe alone shall come neere to the Lord that Moses then 〈◊〉 know that he should goe up to receive the Tables for to what end should Moses have gone forth of the campe accompanied with Aaron and the rest if it had not beene to some end qu. 15. Contra. Yes it was sufficient that God called Moses and bade him come up into the mount though he at the same time had not shewed the end of his comming as chap. 19.24 when God bade him come up the cause is not shewed why he was called the Commandements of God are simplie to be obeyed though it please not the Lord alwayes to shew a reason thereof 2. Wherefore I thinke rather that this was a divers commandement from the former and given him at a divers time Piscator Osiander 1. Cajetane reason is Mandat non solùm ascendere in montem sed morari in eo He biddeth him not onely to come up into the mountaine but to abide there c. which was not said to him before 2. Calvin addeth further that after Moses with his companie were gone up and had seene this vision Altius evehitur Moses c. ut cognoscerent c. Moses is carried up higher that they should know that Moses would have gone no further but at Gods commandement c. It was requisite therefore that Moses should bee called againe and sequestred from the rest that he might not bee thought to have presumed without a warrant 3. Severus maketh a mysterie of it that Moses being gone up with Aaron and the rest Iterum aâ—diâ—â— heareth againe come up And by these two ascendings hee understandeth the two senses of the law the literall and spirituall 4. Ferus maketh this application of it Hic jam tertio vocatur Moses in montem c. Moses is the third time called into the mount to shew that he which is set over the people of God ought often to ascend in prayer 5. Rupertus also understandeth here two ascendings using this reason It is said before vers 9. that Moses and Aaron with the rest ascended but not that they ascended unto the Lord as here the Lord saith Come up to me c. So also Hugo de S. Victor Come up to me which must be so understood that De colle in quo erat ad altiora montis procedâ—ret c. From the hill where he was hee should proceed higher into the mountaine QUEST XXVI What is signified by Moses going up to the mountaine COme up to me into the mountaine 1. Beda draweth this place unto a mysticall sense Moses is called up to the mountaine Vt ex altitudine loci colligat quà m excelsa sit lex That by the height of the place he should gather how high and removed from humane capacitie the law was which he was to receive As our blessed Saviour in the Gospell called his Apostles into the mountaine Matth. 5. and after his resurrection he also appeared in the mountaine when he gave commission to his Apostles to goe and preach the Gospell to all the world but here is the difference because the law which Moses was to receive was but given unto one people therefore Moses onely was called up but the Gospell being appointed to be preached to all the world Christ called all his Apostles to him up into the mountaine 2. Rupertus maketh this ascending up of Moses into the mount a figure of Christs ascending up unto God Non in montem terrenum sed in ipsum coelum Not into an earthly mountaine but into heaven to receive not the killing letter but the quickening Spirit as the Apostle saith He ascended up on high led captivitie captive and gave gifts unto men c. 3. Ferus doth thus moralize it that he which will behold God and give himselfe to contemplation must terrena haec inferiora despicere c. despise these inferiour and terrene things as Moses leaving the campe below ascended up into the mount QUEST XXVII Of the tables of stone whereof they were made and wherefore given Vers. 12. I Will give thee tables of stone 1. The fabulous Jewes imagine that these tables of the law were made of the Saphire a pretious stone Lyran. and that when Moses had broken them comming downe from the mountaine he gathered up the fragments and broken peeces and sold them whereby he was greatly enriched Thus these blinde Jewes are not ashamed to blemish their great Prophet Moses with the note of covetousnesse from the which he was most free Tostat. quaest 16. 2. As frivolous is that other conceit because they are said to be of stone that the tables were but one stone which sometimes seemed but one sometime two for in that they are called tables it sheweth they were more than one of one stone they might bee both that is of one kinde of stone and yet the tables were two 3. These tables of stone were created of God for that speciall use as Exod. 32.16 they are said to be the worke of God it is not improbable that they were noviter creata created of God anew as Tostatus but it is not like that they were written by the Angell which Tostatus thinketh to have spoken in Gods person in the mount for as God prepared the tables themselves so hee caused the writing they were the worke of God for the matter and the writing of God for the manner Exod. 33.16 4. All the lawes which God gave his people were not there written but onely the morall precepts the rest Moses writ sustained in the dayes of his flesh Pelarg. 2. This fast was kept by Moses and the like by 〈…〉 Christi idoneum haberet 〈…〉 That the humanitie of Christ might have a sufficient testimonie for unlesse Moses and Helias had fasted fortie dayes some might have doubted of the humanitie of Christ in holding out so miraculous a fast So Rupertus and Ferus following him 3. And these fasted to this end ut tanto miraculo homines mali c. that men being moved by so great a miracle should not contemne their