his humanity but for that his petigree is not set out in the Genesis as the genealogie of other Patriarches is but is sodenly induced in the holy historie no mention made of his stocke tribe beginning or ending and therfore in that case also resembling in a sort the sonne of God vvhose generation vvas extraordinarie miraculous and ineffable according to both his natures lacking a father in the one and a mother in the other his person hauing neither beginning nor ending and his kingdom and Priesthod specially in him self and in the Church being eternall both in respect of the time past and the time to come as the said Doctor in the same epistle vvriteth 4. Behold To proue that Christes Priesthod far passeth the Priesthod of Aaron and the Priesthod of the nevv Testament the Priesthod of the old lavv and consequently that the sacrifice of our Sauiour and the sacrifice of the Church doth much excel the sacrifices of Moyses lavv he disputeth proâ—oundly of the preeminences of Melchisedec aboue the great Patriarch Abraham vvho vvas father of the Leuites 4. Tithes The first preeminence that Abraham paied tithes and that of the best and most cheefe things that he had vnto Melchisedec as a duety and homage not for him self onely in person but for Leui vvho yet vvas not borne and so for the vvhole Priesthod of Leuies stocke acknovvledging thereby Melchisedec not onely to be a Priest but his Priest and Superior and so of al the Leuitical order And it is here to be obserued that vvhereas in the 14 of Genesis vvhence this holy narration is taken both in the Hebrue and in the 70 it standeth indifferent or doubtfull vvhether Melchisedec paied tithes to Abraham or tooke tithes of him the Apostle here putteth al out of controuersie plainely declaring that Abraham paid tithes to the other at the inferiour to his Priest and Superior And touching paiment of tithes it is a natural duety that men ovve to God in al lavves and to be giuen to his Priests in his behalfe for their honour and liuelihod Iacob promised or vovved to pay them Gen. 28. Moyses appointed them Leuit. 27. Num. 18. Deut. 12. 14. 26. Christ confirmeth that duety Mat. 23 and Abraham specially here giueth them to Melchisedec plainely thereby approuing them or their equiualent to be due to Christ and the Priesthod of the nevv Testament much more then either in the lavv of Moyses or in the lavv of Nature Of vvhich tithes due to the Clergie of Chrises Church see S. Cyprian ep 66. S. Hierom ep 1 c. 7. and ep 2 c. 5. to Hellodorus and Nepolianus S. Augustine ser 119 de tempore 7. Is blessed of the better The second preeminence is that Melchisedec did blesse Abraham vvhich vve see here S. Paul maketh a great and soueraine holy thing grounding our Sauiours prerogatiue aboue the vvhole order of Aaron therein and vve see that in this sort it is the proper act of Prieshod â— and that vvithout al controuersie as the Apostle saith he is greater in dignitie that hath authority to blesse then the person that hath not and therfore the Priests vocation to be in this behalfe far aboue any earthly king vvho hath not povver to giue benediction in this sacred maner neither to man nor other creature As here Melchisedec so Christ blessed much more and so haue the Bishops of his Church done and do Vvhich no man can maruel that our forefathers haue so highly esteemed and sought for if he marke the vvonderful mysterie and grace thereof here expressed 〈…〉 also vvhich here taketh blossing of Melchisedec him self though in an inferior sort blessed his sonnes as the other Patriarches did and fathers do their children by that example 11. If consummation The principal proposition of the vvhole epistle and al the Apostle discourse is inserted grounded vpon the former prerogatiues of Melchisedec aboue Abraham and Leul that is that the end perfection accomplishment and consummation of al mans dueties and debtes to God by the general redemption satisfaction full price and perfect ransom of al mankind vvas not atchieued by any or al the Priests of Aarons order not by any sacrifice or act of that Priesthod or of al the lavv of Moyses vvhich vvas grounded vpon the Leuitical Priesthod but by Christ and his Priesthod vvhich is of the order and rite of Melchisedec 11. What necessitie This disputation of the preeminence of Christes Priesthod aboue the Leuitical order is against the erroneous persuasion of the Ievves that thought their lavv Priesthod and sacrifices to be euerlasting and to be sufficient in them selues vvithout any other Priest then Aaron and his successors and vvithout al relation to Christes Passion or any other redemption or remission then that vvhich their Leuitical offices did procure not knovving that they vvere all figures of Christes death and to be ended and accomplished in the same Vvhich point vvell vnderstood and kept in mind vvill cleere the vvhole controuersie betvvixt the Catholikes and Protestants concerning the sacrifice of the Church for the scope of the Apostles disputation being to auouch the dignity preeminence necessitie and eternal fruite and effect of Christes Passion he had not to treate at all of the other vvhich is a sacrifice depending of his Passion specially vvriting to the Hebrues that vvere to be instructed and reformed first touching the sacrifice of the Crosse before they could fruitfully heare any thing of the other though in couert and by most euident sequele of disputation the learned and faithfull may easily perceiue vvherevpon the said Sacrifice of the Church vvhich is the Masse is grounded And therfore S. Hierom saith ep 126 that al these commendations of Melchisedec are in the type of Christ euius profectus Ecclesiae sacramenta sunt 12. Translated Note vvel this place and you shal perceiue thereby that euery lavvful forme and manner of lavv state or gouernement of Gods people dependeth on Priesthod riseth standeth falleth or altereth vvith the Priesthod In the lavv of Nature the state of the people hanged on one kind of Priesthod in the lavv of Moyses of an other in the state of Christianity of an other and therfore in the former sentence the Apostle said that the Ievvish people or Commonvvealth had their lavv vnder the Leuitical Priesthod and the Greeke more properly expresseth the matter that they vvere legitimated that is to say made a lavvful people or communitie vnder God by the Priesthod for there is no iust nor lavvful Commonvvealth in the vvorld that is not made legal and Gods peculiar and distinguished from vnlavvful Commonvveales that hold of false goddes or of none at al by Priesthod Vvherevpon it is cleere that the nevv lavv and al Christian peoples holding of the same is made lavvful by the Priesthod of the nevv Testament and that the Protestants shamefully are deceiued and deceiue others that vvould haue Christian Commonvveales to lacke
the dead othervvise it is yet of no value vvhiles he that tested liueth ✠verse 18 Vvherevpon neither vvas the first certes dedicated vvithout bloud ✠verse 19 For al the commaundement of the Lavv being read of Moyses to al the people he taking the bloud of calues and goates vvith vvater and scarlet vvool and hyssope sprinkled the very booke also it self and al the people ✠verse 20 saying * ″ This is the bloud of the Testament vvhich God hath commaunded vnto you ✠verse 21 The tabernacle also al the vessel of the ministerie he in like maner sprinkled with bloud ✠verse 22 And al things almost according to the lavv are cleansed with bloud and vvithout sheading of bloud there is not remission ✠verse 23 It is necessarie therfore that ″ the examplers of the coelestials be cleansed vvith these but the celestials them selues vvith better hostes then these ✠verse 24 For IESVS is not entred into Holies made vvith hand examplers of the true but into heauen it self that he may appeare novv to the countenance of God for vs. ✠verse 25 Nor that he should ″ offer him self often as the high priest entereth into the Holies euery yere in the bloud of others ✠verse 26 othervvise he ought to haue suffered often from the beginning of the vvorld but novv once in the cōsummation of the vvorldes to the destructiō of sinne he hath appeared by his ovvne host ✠verse 27 And as it is appointed to men to die once and after this the iudgement ✠verse 28 so also Christ vvas offered once to exhaust the sinnes of many the second time he shal appeare vvithout sinne to them that expect him vnto saluation ANNOTATIONS CHAP. IX 4. A golden potte The Protestants count it superstitious to keepe vvith honour and reuerence the holy memories or monuments of Gods benefites and miracles or the tokens of Christes Passion as his Crosse garments or other things appertaining to him or his Saincts and thinke it impossible that such things should dure so long vvhen they may here see the reuerent and long reseruation of Manna vvhich of it self vvas most apt to putrifie and of Aarons rodde onely for that it sodenly florished by miracle the tables of the Testament c. See a notable place in S. Cyril li. 6 cont Iulian. vvhere he defendeth against Iulian the Apostataes blasphemie he keeping and honouring of that Crosse or vvood vvhich Christ died on See also S. Paulinus ep 11. and vvhat reuerence S. Hierom and the faithful of his time did to the sepulchres of Christ and his Martyrs and to their relikes We reuerence and vvorship saith he euery vvhere Martyrs sepulchres and putting the holy ashes to our eies if vve may vve touch it vvith our mouth also and do some thinke that the monument vvherein our Lord vvas buried it to be neglected But our Protestant can not skill of this they had rather folovv Vigilantius Iulianus the Apostata and such Maisters then the holy Doctors and euident practise of the Church is al ages 5. Cherubins You see it is a fond thing to conclude vpon the first or second commaundement that there should be no sacred images in the Church vvhen euen among these people that vvere most prone to idolatrie and grosse in imagination of spiritual things such as Angels are and to vvhom the precept vvas specially giuen the same God that forbade them grauen idols did commaund these images of Angels to be made and set in the soueraine holiest place of al the Tabernacle or Temple By vvhich it is plaine that much more the images of Christ and his B. mother and Saincts that may be more truely pourtered then mere spiritual substances can be are not contrarie to Gods cōmaundement nor against his honour or repugnant to any other Scripture at all vvhich condemne onely the Idols or pourtraitures of the Heathen made for adoration of false Gods 10. Vntil the time of correction Al those grosse and carnal sacrifices ceremonies and obseruations instituted to cleanse and purifie the flesh from legal irregularities and impurities onely and not reaching to the purging of the soules consciences of men being commaunded not for euer but till Christes comming ceased then and better more forcible and more spiritual Sacraments vvere instituted in their place For vve may not imagine Christ to haue taken avvay the old and put none in their places or to alter the sacraments onely into other sacraments external and not also to translate the sacrifices to some other more excellent for it is called tempus correctionis non abolitionis sacrificij aut legis the time of correction not of abolishing sacrifice or lavv Neither haue they more reason to affirme Christes one oblation vpon the Crosse to haue rather taken avvay al kind of sacrifice then al manner of Sacraments The time and state of the nevv Testament is not made lavvlesse hostlesse or vvithout sacrifice but it is the time of correction or reformation and abettering al the foresaid things 12. Eternal redemption No one of the sacrifices nor al the sacrifices of the old lavv could make that one general price ransom and redemption of all mankind and of al sinnes sauing this one highest Priest Christ and the one sacrifice of his bloud once offered vpon the Crosse Vvhich sacrifice of redemption can not be often done because Christ could not die but once though the figures also thereof in the lavv of nature and of Moyses vvere truely called sacrifices as specially this high and maruelous commemoration of the same in the holy Sacrament of the altar according to the rite of the nevv Testament is most truely and sigularly as S. Augustine calleth it a sacrifice But neither this sort nor the other of the old lavv being often repeated and done by many Priests al vvhich vvere and are sinners them selues could be the general redeeming and consummating sacrifice nor any one of those Priests nor al the Priests together either of the lavv of Nature or of Aarons or Melchisedecks order except Christ alone coulde be the general redeemers of the vvorld And this is the Apostles meaning in al this comparison and opposition of Christes death to the old sacrifices and of Christ to their Priests and not that Christes death or sacrifice of the Crosse should take avvay al sacrifices or proue that those Aaronical offices vvere no true sacrifices at al nor those Priests verily Priests They vvere true Priests true sacrifices though none of those sacrifices vvere the high capital and general sacrifice of our price and redemption nor none of them or of those Priests could vvithout respect to this one sacrifice of Christes death vvorke any thing to Gods honour or remission of sinnes as the Ievves did falsely imagine not referring them at al to this general redemption and remission by Christ but thinking them to be absolute sacrifices in them selues
✠verse 5 So Christ also ″ did not glorifie him self that he might be made a high priest but he that spake to him My Sonne art thou I this day haue begotteÌ„ thee ✠verse 6 As also in an other place he saith Thou art ″ a priest for euer according to the order of Melchisedec ⊢ ✠verse 7 Vvho in the daies of his flesh ″ vvith a strong crie and teares offering praiers and supplications to him that could faâ—e him from death vvas heard ″ for his reuerence ⊢ ✠verse 8 And truely vvhereas he was the Sonne he learned by those things vvhich he suffered obedience ✠verse 9 and being consummate ″ vvas made to al that obey him cause of eternal saluation ✠verse 10 called of God a high priest according to the order of Melchisedec ✠verse 11 Of vvhome vve haue great speache and ″ inexplicable to vtter because you are become vveake to heare ✠verse 12 For vvhereas you ought to be maisters for your time you neede to be taught againe your selues vvhat be the elements of the beginning of the vvordes of God and you are become such as haue neede of milke not of strong meate ✠verse 13 For euery one that is partaker of milke is vnskilful of the vvord of iustice for he is a childe ✠verse 14 But strong meate is for the perfect them that by custome haue their senses exercised to the discerning of good euil ANNOTATIONS CHAP. V. 1. Euery high Priest By the description of a Priest or high Priest for to this purpose al is one matter he proueth Christ to be one in most excellent sort First then a Priest must not be an Angel or of any other nature but mans Secondly euery man is not a Priest but such an one as is specially chosen out of the rest and preferred before other of the community seuered assumpted and exalted into a higher state and dignitie then the vulgar Thirdly the cause and purpose vvhy he is so sequestred and piked out from the residue is to take charge of Diuine things to deale as a mediator betvvixt God and the people to be the Deputie of men in such things as they haue to craue or to receiue of God and to present or giue to him againe Fourthly the most proper and principal part of a Priests office is to offer oblations giftes and sacrifices to God for the sinnes of the people vvithout vvhich kind of most soueraine dueties no person people or Commonvvealth can appertaine to God and vvhich can be done by none of vvhat other dignitie or calling soeuer he be in the vvorld that is not a Priest diuers Princes as vve read in the Scriptures punished by God and king Saul deposed from his kingdom specially for attempting the same And generally vve may learne here that in ijs qua sunt ad Deum in an matters touching God his seruice and religion the Priest hath onely charge and authority as the Prince temporal is the peoples gouernour guider and so retaine in the things touching their vvorldly affaires Vvhich must for al that by him be directed and manneged no othervvise but as is agreable to the due vvorship and seruice of God against vvhich if the terrene Povvers commit any thing the Priests ought to admonish them from God Vve learne also hereby that euery one is not a Priest and that the people must alvvaies haue certaine persons chosen out from among them to deale in their sutes and causes vvith God to pray to minister Sacraments and to sacrifice for them And vvhereas the Protestants vvil haue no Priest Priesthod nor sacrifice but Christ and his death pretending these vvordes of the Apostle to be verified onely in the Priesthod and Seruice of the old lavv and Christes person alone and after him of no moe therein they shevv them selues to be ignorant of the Scriptures and of the state of the nevv Testament and induce a plaine Atheisme and Godlesnesse into the vvorld for so long as man hath to doe vvith God there must needes be some deputed and chosen out from among the rest to deale according to this declaration of the Apostle in things pertaining to God and those must be Priests for els if men neede to deale no more but immediatly vvith Christ vvhat doe they vvith their Ministers Vvhy let they not euery man pray and minister for him self and to him self Vvhat doe they vvith Sacraments seing Christes death is as vvel sufficient vvithout them as vvithout sacrifice Vvhy standeth not his death as vvel vvith Sacrifice as vvith Sacraments as vvel vvith Priesthod as vvith other Ecclesiastical functioÌ„ There is no other cause in the vvorld but that Sacrifice being the most principal act of religion that man ovveth to God both by his Lavv and by the lavv of nature the Diuel by these his ministers vnder pretence of deferring or artributing the more to Christes death vvould abolish it This definition of a Priest and his function vvith al the properties thereto belonging holdeth not onely in the lavv of Moyses and order of Aarons Priesthod but it vvas true before in the lavv of nature in the Patriarches in Melchisedec and novv in Christ and all his Apostles and Priests of the nevv Testament sauing that it is a peculiar excellencie in Christ that he onely offered for other mens sinnes and not at all for his ovvne as all other doe 4. Taketh to him self A special prouiso for all Priests preachers and such as haue to deale for the people in things pertaining to God that they take not that honour or office at their ovvne hands but by lavvful calling and consecration euen as Aaron did By vvhich clause if you examine Luther Caluin Beza and the like or if al such as novv a daies intrude them selues into sacred functions looke into their consciences great and foul matter of damnation vvil appeare 5. Did not glorifie him self The dignity of Priesthod must needes be passing high and soueraine vvhen it vvas a promotion and pereferment in the sonne of God him self according to his manhod and vvhen he vvould not vsurpe nor take vpon him the same vvithout his fathers expresse commission and calling therevnto An eternal example of humility and an argument of condemnation to al mortal men that arrogate vniustly any function or povver spiritual that is not giuen them from aboue and by lavvful calling and commission of their superiors 6. A Priest for euer In the 109 Psalme from vvhence this testimonie is taken both Christes kingdom and Priesthod are set fourth but the Apostle vrgeth specially his Priesthod as the more excellent and preeminent state in him our Redemption being vrought atchieued by sacrifice vvhich vvas an act of his Priesthod and not of his kingly povver though he vvas properly a king also as Melchisedec vvas both Priest and king being a resemblance of Christ in both but much more in his
And that to haue been the errour of the Hebrues you may read in S. Augustine li. 3. doct Christ c. 6. And this vve tel the Protestants is the onely purpose of the Apostle But they be so grosse or ignorant in the Scriptures and so malitiously set against Gods and the Churches truth that they peruersely and folishly turne the vvhole disputation against the sacrifice of the B. Masse and the Priests of the new Testament as though vve held that the sacrifice of the altar vvere the general redemption or redeeming sacrifice or that it had no relation to Christes death or that it vvere not the representation and most liuely resemblance of the same or vvere not instituted and done to apply in particular to the vse of the partakers that other general benefite of Christes one oblation vpon the Crosse Against the Ievves then onely S. Paul disputeth and against the false opinion they had of their Priests and sacrifices to vvhich they attributed al remission and redemption vvithout respect of Christes death 15. Of those preuarications The Protestants do vnlearnedly imagine that because al sinnes be remitted by the force of Christes passion that therfore there should be no other sacrifice after his death Vvhereas in deede they might as vvell say there ought neuer to haue been sacrifice appointed by God either in the lavv of Nature or of Moyses as al their argumeÌ„ts made against the Sacrifice of the Church vpon the Apostles discourse proue as vvel or rather onely that there vvere no sacrifices of Aarons order or Leuitical lavv at all For against the Ievves false opinion concerning them doth he dispute and not a vvord touching the sacrifice of the Church vnto vvhich â—n al this discourse he neuer opposeth Christes sacrifice vpon the Crosse al Christian men vvel knovving that the host oblation of those tvvo though they differ in maner and external forme yet is in deede al one The Apostle then shevveth here plainely that al the sinnes that euer vvere remitted since the beginning of the vvorld vvere no othervvise forgiuen but by the force and in respect of Christes Passion Yet it folovveth not therevpon that the oblations of Abel Abraham Aaron c vvere no sacrifices as by the Heretikes foolish deduction it should do S. Paul not opposing Christes Passion to them for the intent to proue them to haue been no sacrifices but to proue that they vvere not absolute sacrifices nor the redeeming or consummating Sacrifice vvhich could not be many nor done by many Priests but by one and at one time by a more excellent Priest theÌ„ any of them or any other mere mortal man And that you may see the blasphemous pride and ignorance of Caluin and in him of al his fellovves read so many as may read Heretical bookes his commentarie vpon this place and there you shal see him gather vpon this that Christes death had force from the beginning vvas the remedie for al sinnes since the creation of the vvorld therfore there must be no moâ— but that one sacrifice of Christes death Vvhich must needes by his deduction hold as it doth in deede no lesse against the old sacrifices then the nevv sacrifice of the Church and so take avvay al vvhich is against the Apostles meaning and al religion 20. This is the bloud Christes death vvas necessarie for the full confirmation ratification and accomplishement of the nevv Testament though it vvas begonne to be dedicated in the sacrifice of his last supper being also vvithin the compasse of his Passion Vvhich is euident by the vvordes prouounced by Christ ouer the holy chalice vvhich be correspondent to the vvordes that vvere spoken as the Apostle here declareth in the first sacrifice of the dedication of the old lavv hauing also expresse mention of remission of sinnes thereby as by the bloud of the nevv Testament Vvhereby it is plaine that the B. Chalice of the altar hath the very sacrificall bloud in it that vvas shed vpon the Crosse in by vvhich the nevv Testament vvhich is the lavv of spirit grace and remission vvas dedicated and doth consist And therfore it is also cleere that many diuine things vvhich to the Heretikes or ignorant may seeme to be spoken onely of Christes sacrifice vpon the Crosse be in deede verified fulfilled also in the sacrifice of the altar Vvhereof S. Paul for the causes aforesaid vvould not treate in plaine termes See Isychius li. 1 in Leuit. c. 4 paulo post initium applying al these things to the immolation of Christ also in the Sacrament 23. The examplers Al the offices places vessels and instruments of the old lavv vvere but figures and resemblances of the state and sacraments of the nevv Testament vvhich are here called celestials for that they are the liuely image of the heauenly state next ensuing vvhich be therfore specially dedicated and sanctified in Christes bloud sacrificed on the altar and sprinkled vpon the faithful as the old figures and people vvere cleansed by the bloud of beasts And therfore by a transition vsual in the holy Scriptures the Apostle sodenly passeth in the senteÌ„ce immediatly folovving and turneth his talke to Christes entrance into heauen the state vvhereof both by the Sacraments of the old lavv and also more specially by them of the nevv is prefigured 25. Offer him self often As Christ neuer died but once not neuer shal die againe so in that violent painful and blouddy sort he can neuer be offered againe neither needeth he so to be offered any more hauing by that one action of sacrifice vpon the Crosse made the full ransom redemption and remedie for the sinnes of the vvhole vvorld Neuerthelesse as Christ died and vvas offered after a sort in all the sacrifices of the Lavv and Nature since the beginning of the vvorld al vvhich vvere figures of this one oblation vpon the Crosse so is he much rather offered in the sacrifice of the altar of the nevv Testament incomparably more neerely diuinely and truely expressing his death his body broken his bloud shed then did any figure of the old lavv or other sacrifice that euer vvas as being in deede though in hidden sacramental and mysticall and vnblouddy maner the very self same B. body and bloud the self same host oblation and sacrifice that vvas doue vpon the Crosse And this truth is most euident by the very forme of vvordes vsed by our Sauiour in the institution and consecration of the holy Sacrament and by the profession of all the holy Doctors Our sacrifice saith S. Cyprian is correspondent to the Passion of Christ And The sacrifice that vve offer is the Passion of Christ ep 63. nu 4. nu 7. S. Augustine de fâ—d ad Pet. c. 19. In those carnal sacrifices vvas the prosiguring of the flesh of Christ vvhich he vvas to offer for sinnes and of the bloud vvhich he vvas to sheads but in this Sacrifice is the commemoration of the flesh of Christ vvhich
place it is euident that all hostes and sacrifices be not taken avvay by Christ as the Heretikes folishly conceiue but that the old hostes of brute beastes be abrogated to giue place to that vvhich is the proper host of the nevv lavv that is Christes ovvne body 1â— Often offering the same hostes As S. Paul is forced often to inculcate that one principle of the efficacâ—e and sufficiencie of Christes death because of the Hebrues to much attributing to their legal sacrifices and for that they did not 〈◊〉 them to Christes onely oblation so vve through the intolerable ignorance and importunity of the Heretikes of this time abusing the vvordes of the Apostle spoken in the devve defence and declaration of the valure and efficacie of Christes Passion aboue the sacrifices of the Lavv are forced to repeat often that the Apostles reason of many Priests and often repetition of the self same sacrifices concerneth the sacrifices of the Lavv onely vnto vvhich he opposeth Christes sacrifice and Priesthod and speaketh no vvord of or against the Sacrifice of the nevv Testament vvhich is the sacrifice of Christes ovvne Priesthod Lavv and institution yea the same sacrifice done daily vnblouddily that once vvas done blouddily made by the same Priest Christ Iesus though by his ministers hands and not many hostes as those of the old lavv vvere but the very self same in number euen Christes ovvne body that vvas crucified And that you may see that this is the iudgement of all antiquity and their exposition of these and the like vvordes of this Epistle and that they seeing the very same arguments that the Protestants novv make so much a doe vvithall among the simple and vnlearned yet vvel perceiued that they made nothing against the daily oblation or sacrifice of the altar and therfore ansvvered them before the Protestants vvere extant 1200 yeres vve vvil set dovvne some of their vvordes vvhose authoritie and exposition of the Scriptures must preuaile in all that haue vvisedom or the feare of God aboue the false and vaine gloses of Caluin and his folovvers Thus then first saith S. Ambrose Quid 〈◊〉 c. What vve then do not vve offer euery day vve offer surely but this sacrifice is an exampler of that for vve offer alvvaies the self same and not novv one lambe to morovv an other but alvvaies the self same thing therfore it is one sacrifice othervvise by this reason because it is offered in many places there should be many Christes not so but it is one Christ in euery place here vvhole and there vvhole one body But 〈◊〉 vvhich vve doe is done for a commemoratieâ— of that vvhich vvas done for vve offer not an other sacrifice as the high Priest of the old lavv but alvvaies the self same c. Primaâ—ius S. Augustines scholer doth also preoccupate these Protestants obiections thus What shal vve say then I do not our Priests daily offer sacrifice they offer surely because vve sinne daily and daily haue neede to be cleansed and because he can not die he hath giuen vs the sacrament of his body and bloud that as his Passion vvas the redemption and absolution of the vvorld so also this oblation may be redemption and cleansing to all that offer it in truth and veritie So saith this holy father to vvitte that as the sacrifice of the Crosse vvas a general redemption so this of the altar is to all that vse it a particular redemption or application of Christes redemption to them In vvhich sense also V. Bede calleth the holy Masse redemptionâ—â— corporis anima 〈◊〉 the euerlasting redemption of body and soul li. 4 c. 22. histor Againe the same Primasius The diuinity of the Word of God vvhich is euery vvhere maketh that there are not many sacrifices but one although it be offered of many and that as it is one body vvhich he tooke of the Virgins vvombe not many bodies euen so also one sacrifice not diuers as those of the Ievves vvere S. Chrysostom also and after him Theophylacte and Oecumenius and of the Latines Haimo Paschasius Remigius and others obiect to them selues thus Do not vve also offer euery day vve offer surely but this sacrifice is an exampler of that for vve offer alvvaies the self same and not novv one lambe to morrovv an other but the self same therfore this is one sacrifice Othervvise because it is offered in many places there should be many Christes And a litle after Not an other sacrifice as the high Priest of the old Lavv but the self same vve do alvvaies offer rather vvorking a remembrance or commemoration of the sacrifice See the Annotation Luke 22 19. vpon these vvordes A commemoration Thus did al the auncient fathers Greeke and Latin treate of these matters and so they said Masse and offered daily and many of them made such formes of celebrating the diuine sacrifice as the Greekes and Latines do vse in their Liturgies and Masses and yet they lavv these places of the Apostle and made commentaries vpon them and vnderstood them I trovv as vvel as the Protestants He that for his further confirmation or comfort list see vvhat the auÌ„cient Councels and Doctors beleeued taught and practised in this thing let him read the first holy Councel of Nice cap. 14 in fine Conc. ex Grace the Councel of Ephesus Anathematis 11. the Chalcedon Councel act 3. pag. 112. Conc. Aneyran c. 1. 4. 5. Neocaesar can 13. Laodic can 19. Carthag 2 cap. â— Carthag 3 cap. 24. Carthag 4 cap. 33. c. 41. S. Denys cap. 3 Eccl. hier S. Andrevve in historia Passiones S. Ignatius ep ad Smyrnonses S. Martialis ep ad Burdegalenses S. Iustine Dialog cum Triphone S. Irencus li. 4 cap. 32. 34. Tertullian de cultu forminarum de corona milis Origen homil 〈◊〉 in Leuit. S. Cyprian ep ad Cecilium nu 2. de Cana Domini nu 14. Eusebius demonst Euang. li. 1 cap. 10. and the rest vvhich vve haue cited by occasion before might cite but for rediousnes a truth most knovven and agreed vpon in the Christian religion 18. Novv there is not Christes death can not be applied vnto vs in that full and ample sort as it is in baptisme but once Christ appointing that large remission and application to be made but once in euery man as Christ died but once for it is not meant that all sinne shal cease after Christes sacrifice vpon the Crosse nor that there should be no oblation for sinnes committed after Baptisme or that a man could not sinne at al after Baptisme or that if he sinned aftervvard he could haue no remedie or remission by Gods ordinance in the Church vvhich diuers falsehods sundrie Heretikes gather of this and such like places but onely the Apostle telleth the Hebrues as he did before chap. 6 and as he doth straight aftervvard that if they fall novv vvherevnto they seemed very
tvvo vvordes more then is in the Greeke which though it might be the sense of the place and S. Augustine so expoundeth it yet they should not make his exposition the text of holy Scripture specially vvhereas he only of al the auncient fathers as Beza confesseth so expoundeth it 33. Wrought iustice Men are not iust by beleefe onely as the Protestants affirme but by vvorking iustice And vve may note that in all this long commendation of faith in the fathers and holy persons their good vvorkes are also specially recounted as Rahabs harbouring the spies Abrahams offering his sonne vvhich their vvorkes S. Iames doth inculcate Noâ—s making the Arke Gen. 6. Abels better oblation then Cains Gen. 4. Hebr. 11. v. 4. and so forth therfore S. Clement Alexandrinus saith that the said persons and others vvere lust by saith and obedience by faith and hospitality by faith and patience by faith and humility The Apostles purpose then is nothing els but to proue to the Hebrues vvho made so great account of their Patriarches and forefathers and their famous actes that all these glorious personages and their vvorkes vvere commendable and acceptable onely through the faith they had of Christ vvithout vvhich faith none of all their liues and vvorkes should haue profited them any vvhit the Gentiles doing many noble actes as Heretikes may also doe vvhich are of no estimatioÌ„ before God because they lacke faith And that is the scope of S. Paules Epistle to the Romanes and of al other passages vvhere he commendeth faith further prouing specially in this Epistle to the Hebrues that all their sacrifices vvere nothing els but figures and attestations of the Christian faith in Christ and his death Al vvhich high resolution conclusion against the Ievves and Gentiles that the Christian faith is the true faith religion the Heretikes of our time ignorantly and brutishly abuse against Christian vvorkes sacrifice and Sacraments vvhich the Apostle meant specially to commend and establish by his high commendation of the faith in Christ 40. Without vs should not The fathers before Christ could not be accomplished that is not admitted to the heauenly ioyes vision and fruition of God till the Apostles and other of the nevv lavv vvere associate to them and the vvay to euerlasting glorie opened by our Lordes death and Ascension Neither shal either they or vve be fully perfected in glorie both of body and soul till the general resurrection Gods prouidence being so that vve should not one be consummated vvithout an other all being of one faith and redeemed by one Lord Christ CHAP. XII By the foresaid examples he exhorteth them to patience 2 and by example of Christ him self crucified 5 and because this discipline it an argument that they be Gods children 9 vvith vvhâ—se rodde they should be much more content then vvish that of their carnal fathers and because it bringeth iustification 12 Exhorting them therfore to plucke vp their hartes and to take faster footing 18 considering that all bring novv so svveete and not terrible as in the old Testament their damnation if they refuse to heare vvil be so much the greater verse 1 AND therfore vve also hauing so great a cloud of vvitnesses put vpon vs * laying avvay al vveight and sinne that compasseth vs by patience let vs runne to the fight proposed vnto vs ✠verse 2 looking on the author of faith and the consummator IESVS vvho ioy being proposed vnto him sustained the crosse contemning confusion and sitteth on the right hand of the seate of God ✠verse 3 For thinke diligently vpon him vvhich sustained of sinners such contradiction against him self that you be not vvearied fainting in your mindes ✠verse 4 For you haue not yet resisted vnto bloud repugning against sinne ✠verse 5 and you haue forgotten the consolatioÌ„ vvhich speaketh to you as it vvere to children saying My sonne neglect not the discipline of our Lord neither â—e thou vvearied vvhiles thou art rebuked of him ✠verse 6 For vvhom our Lord loueth he chasteneth and â— he scourgeth euery childe that he receiueth ✠verse 7 Perseuêre ye in discipline As vnto children doth God offer him self to you for vvhat sonne is there vvhom the father doth not correct ✠verse 8 But if you be vvithout discipline vvhereof al be made partakers then are you bastards not children ✠verse 9 Moreouer the fathers in deede of our flesh vve had for instructors and vve did reuerence them shal vve not much more obey the Father of spirites liue ✠verse 10 And they in deede for a time of fevv daies according to their vvil instructed vs but he to that vvhich is profitable in receiuing of his sanctification ✠verse 11 And al discipline for the present certes seemeth not to be of ioy but of sorovv but aftervvard it vvil render to them that are exercised by it most peaceable fruite of iustice ✠verse 12 For the vvhich cause stretch vp the slacked handes and the loose knees ✠verse 13 and make straight steppes to your feete that no man halting erre but rather be healed ✠verse 14 * Folovv peace vvith al men and holinesse vvithout vvhich no man shal see God ✠verse 15 looking diligently lest any man be vvanting to the grace of God lest any roote of bitternes springing vp do hinder and by it many be polluted ✠verse 16 Lest there be any fornicator or prophane person as Esau * vvho for one dish of meate sold his first-birth-rightes ✠verse 17 For knovv ye that aftervvard also desiring to inherite the benediction he vvas reprobated * for â— he found not place of repeÌ„tance although vvith teares he had sought it ✠verse 18 For you are not come to * a palpable mount and an accessible'fire and vvhirlevvinde and darkenes and storme ✠verse 19 and the souÌ„d of trompet voice of vvordes vvhich they that heard excused them selues that the vvord might not be spokeÌ„ to them ✠verse 20 for they did not heare that which was said And if a beast shal touche the mount it shal be stoned ✠verse 21 And so terrible vvas it vvhich vvas seen Moyses said I am frighted and tremble ✠verse 22 But you are come to mount Sion and the citie of the liuing God heauenly Hierusalem and the assemblie of many thousand Angels ✠verse 23 the Church of the first-borne vvhich are vvritten in the heauens and the iudge of all God and the spirites of the iust made perfect ✠verse 24 and the mediator of the nevv Testament IESVS and the sprinkling of bloud speaking better then * Abel ✠verse 25 See that you refuse him not speaking for if they escaped not refusing him that spake vpon the earth much more vve that turne avvay from him speaking to vs from heauen ✠verse 26 Vvhose voice moued the earth then but novv he promiseth
Cain Balaam Corè 695. 704. to the Diuel him self 244 marg Al the forerūners of Antichrist p. 123. 124. 240 marg 556. 558. 679. 741. False-prophets false christes lying maisters foretold in the new Testament 119 marg 68 and 69 and 669 marg Many maisters 648. Many antichristes 679 nu 18. Rauening vvolues 19. 353. Theeues not entring by the doore 248 m. 250. Prophecied of and liuely described by S. Paul S. Peter S. Iude c. 352. 573. 574. 669. 670. 672. 693. locustes 715. The causes that men fall to heresie 565. mar 583. Heauen shut vntil the Passion of Christ p. 9. nu 16. p. 621. marg p. 633. See Limbus patrum Differences of rewardes and glorie in heauen p. 37. 58. 430. 465. marg 534. nu 1. 259. marg See Merites Vvorkes Revvard Hospitalitie toward the afflicted for religion 27 marg 28. nu 41. 505 marg See Almes Vvhat a heinous sault it is not to receiue and harbour Catholike Preachers and Priests 163. marg I IESVS in English Sauiour 4 marg This name is to be adored and reuerenced 530. It worketh miracles 112. 299 marg The force thereof against Diuels ibid. and 577. Ansvvers to the sophistical arguments vsed by heretikes against the reuerence done to this name 530. By irreuerence therevnto they prepare the way to Antichrist 723. Idols in al the Bible signifie the false Gods of the Pagans 687 383 mar The Caluinistes applying the word against sacred Images are condēned long since by the 2 Councel of Nice 687. See Images They are ashamed of their translating image for idol ibid. Heresies are the idols of the new Testament pag. 448. Images 345. 623. 687. 688. They haue Gods owne warrant 623. 688. Their differēce from idols 687. 688. Hovv they are adored 530. 633. Their antiquitie 24. 688. Their fruite and commoditie 345. 688. Images of the B. Trinitie and of Angels 345. Image-breakers old cōdemned Heretikes by the 2 Nicene Councel 687. 688. They are accursed by the same Councel that apply the places of Scripture that speake of the Pagans Idols against sacred images 687. Miracles wrought by the image of Christ p. 24. The abolishing of Christs image a preparatiō to set vp the image of Antichrist 723. The honour of Christs image is the honour of Christ him self 723. Indulgences See Pardons Iustification or to be iustified vvhat it signifieth 387. nu 13. The first and second iustification 387. The first iustification of mere grace vvithout vvorkes 392. 409. 412. nu 32. 516. 389. marg Iustification by vvorkes pag. 16. 138. 387. pag. 645. 646. 647. 682. 736. Not by faith only See faith Vvhat vvorkes iustifie not pag. 390. nu 20. 28. p. 392. 411. 632. nu 6. 633. 499. marg Iustification attributed to hope charitie c. 402. 633. nu 33. Charitie the principal vertue in iustification 509. 566. Hovv the Protestants admit charitie good workes to iustificatiō 509. Vvhy it îs so often attributed to saith 394. 632. 502 marg 606. marg S. Paules meaning vvhen he commendeth faith 633. The iustice of faith 408. True inherent iustice not imputatiue 14. 138. 139. 387. 390. 394. marg 395. nu 5. pag. 427. nu 30. pag. 511. 513 marg 517. mar 519. mar 524 marg 543. 682. 398 marg Hovv it is said None iust 390. Hovv it is said Reputed to iustice 391 marg Increase of iustice 744 marg 396 marg 550 marg Hovv it is called Gods iustice 383 marg 390 nu 22. pag. 480. 481. 531. Hovv Christ is our iustice 427. The Protestants auoid the vvord Iustifications 138. nu 6. p. 736. nu 8. The iustice of Moyses Lavv vvhat 408 marg L Ovr B. LADIE vvithout sinne 94. 395. 676. Her perpetual virginitie 4. 5. nu 25. She vovved virginitie 138. Her life death Assumption pag. 291. Her blessednes 171 marg Her festiuities 291. Her excellencie titles prerogatiues 138. 139. 173. 221. 273. 291. 292. 171 marg Her honour 139. 291. 292. She is our Aduocate 292. 679. our hope 292. 548. marg The meaning of the termes and titles giuen vnto her 292. God and our Ladie saue vs. 337. The often saying of the Aue Marie 138. The auncient fathers vsed the same 291. 292. Holy Simeon prophecied of her sorovves 145. She vvas alvvaies partaker of sorovves vvith Christ ibidem 272 marg ful of deepe contemplations 142. The meaning of Christs speaches vnto her that may seeme hard 221. nu 4. 5. The Protestants keepe no Holiday of her 191. They keepe not the day of her death as they doe of all other cheefe Saincts in the new Church of Englād ibidem They are not of those generations that she prophecied should call her blessed 136 marg They derogate from her honour 138. 295. Laie men must not iudge of their Pastors of the sense of Scriptures of questions in religion pag. 344. They must receiue the Sacraments c. not at their owne hand but of their Clergie and Pastors 40. nu 19. 42. marg See Priests Clergie Limbus patrum or Abrahams bosom 186. marg 187. 296. 633. 708 marg 621. mar A third place 162. 708 marg The iust men of the old Testament were not in heauen til Christs Ascension 186. Christ descended into Hel to deliuer them 187. See Hel Heauen M MAchabees Canonical Scripture 138. See p. 250. MARIE See our B. Ladie L. Mariage a Sacrament 55. nu 6. p. 187. nu 18. p. 221. nu 2. p. 523. Indissoluble both parties liuing 14. 55. 113 marg 116. 187. 221. 397. marg 440. and not lawful after diuorce ibidem Honoured by Christs presence p. 221. Perfect best without carnal copulation 4. nu 16. See Chastitie Continencie How it is honorable in al. 637. Inferior to virginitie and widow hod 4. 438. marg 439 marg 440. See Chastitie Mariage of Priests and votaries vnlawful See Priests Vovv Old heresies against Mariage 574. Catholikes falsely charged vvith the same 574. 575. They esteeme of mariage more then the Protestants 523. Martyrs true and false p 13. p 457. No true Martyrdom out of the Cathol Church p. 457. Martyrdom a most acceptable sacrifice 592. Their reward glorie 702 and 713 marg How they crie for reuenge 712. Their chereful and constant countenance before the persecutors 305 marg Their comfort at the very time of death torments 309 marg MASSE See Sacrifice The word Masse 447. The Liturgie or Masse of the Apostles 330. of the Greeke fathers ibidem It is agreable to Christs institution 451. 452. 453. to the Apostles tradition 454. to S. Paul concerning the praiers and petitions therein 567. Kyrie eleison 463. Gloria in excelsis pag. 140 inner marg Sanctus thrise repeated 707 and 708. Hosanna 61. Sursum corda 463. The Canon 267. The Pater noster 567. Agnus Dei 217 inner marg 453 nu 29. Kissing the Pax. 423. Domine nō sum dignus 21. 453. nu 29. Communio 452. Hovv Antichrist his Ministers shal abolish the Masse
TestameÌ„t they are forced to forsake the Greeke of the nevv or if they vvil mainteine the Greeke of the nevv they must forsake sometime the Hebrue in the old but this argument shal be forced against them els vvhere By this litle the Reader may see vvhat gay patrones they are of the Greeke text and how litle cause they haue in their owne iudgements to translate it or vaunt of it as in derogation of the vulgar Latin translation how easily we might answer them in a word why we translate not the Greeke forsooth because it is so infinitely corrupted But the truth is we do by no meanes grauÌ„t it so corrupted as they say though in comparison we know it lesse sincere incorrupt then the vulgar Latin and for that cause and others before alleaged we preferre the said Latin and haue translated it If yet there remaine one thing which perhaps they wil say when they can not answer our reasons aforesaid to wit that we preferre the vulgar Latin before the Greeke text because the Greeke maketh more against vs we protest that as for other causes we preferre the Latin so in this respect of making for vs or against vs we allow the Greeke as much as the Latin yea in sundrie places more then the Latin being assured that they haue not one and that we haue many aduantages in the Greeke more then in the Latin as by the Annotations of this new Testament shal euidently appeare namely in al such places where they dare not translate the Greeke because it is for vs against them as when they translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ordinances and not iustification and that of purpose as Beza confesseth Luc. 1 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ordinances or instructions and not traditions in the better part 2 Thess 2 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Elders and not Priests 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 images rather then idols and especially when S. Luke in the Greeke so maketh for vs the vulgar Latin being indifferent for them and vs that Beza saith it is a corruption crept out of the margent into the text Vvhat neede these absurd diuises and false dealings with the Greeke text if it made for them more then for vs yea if it made not for vs against them But that the Greeke maketh more for vs see 1 Cor. 7. In the Latin Defraude not one another but for a time that you giue your selues to prayer in the Greeke to fasting and prayer Act. 10 30. in the Latin Cornelius saith from the fourth day past vntil this houre I vvas praying in my house and behold a man c. in the Greeke I vvas fasting and praying 1 Io. 5 18 in the Latin Vve knovv that euery one vvhich is borne of God sinneth not but the generation of God preserueth him c. in the Greeke but he that is borne of God preserueth him self Apoc. 22 14. in the Latin Blessed are they that vvash their garmeÌ„ts in the bloud of the lambe c. in the Greeke Blessed are they that doe his commaundements Rom. 8 38. Certus sum c. I am sure that neither death nor life nor other creature is able to separate vs from the charitie of God as though he vvere assured or we might and should assure our selues of our predestination in the Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am probably persuaded that neither death nor life c. In the Euangelists about the Sacrifice and B. Sacrament in the Latin thus This is my bloud that shal be shed for you and in S. Paul This is my body vvhich shal be betraied or deliuered for you both being referred to the time to come and to the sacrifice on the crosse in the Greeke This is my bloud vvhich is shed for you and my body vvhich is broken for you both being referred to that present time when Christ gaue his body and bloud at his supper then sheading the one and breaking the other that is sacrificing it sacramentally and mystically Loe these and the like our aduantages in the Greeke more then in the Latin But is the vulgar translation for al this Papistical therfore do we folow it for so some of them call it and say it is the worst of al other If it be the Greeke as you see is more and so both Greeke and Latin and consequently the holy Scripture of the new Testament is Papistical Againe if the vulgar Latin be Papistical Papistrie is very auncient and the Church of God for so many hundred yeres wherein it hath vsed and allowed this translation hath been Papistical But wherein it is Papistical forsooth in these phrases and speaches Pâ—â—nitentiam agite Sacramentum hoc magnum est AVE GRATIA PLENA Talibus hostiis promeretur Deus and such like First doth not the Greeke say the same see the Annotations vpon these places Secondly could he translate these things Papistically or partially or rather prophetically so long before they were in controuersie thirdly doth he not say for pâ—â—nitentiam agite in an other place pâ—â—nitemini and doth he not translate other mysteries by the vvord Sacramentum as Apoc. 17 Sacramentum mulieris and as he translateth one vvord Gratia plena so doth he not translate the very like vvord plenus vlceribus vvhich them selues do folow also is this also Papistrie Vvhen he said Heb. 10 29. Quanto deteriora merebitus supplicia c. and they like it vvel ynough might he not haue said according to the same Greeke word Vigilate vt mereamini fugere ista omnia stare ante filium hominis Luc. 21 36. and Qui merebuntur saculum illud resurrectionem exmortuis c. Luc. 10 35. and Tribulationes quas sustinetis vt mereamini regnum Dei pro quo et patimini 2. Thess 1. 5. Might he not we say if he had partially affecteted the word merite haue vsed it in al these places according to his and your owne translation of the same Greeke word Hebr. 10 29 Vvhich he doth not but in al these places saith simply Vt digni habeamini and Qui digni habebâ—â—tur and how can it be iudged Papistical or partial when he saith Talibus hostiis promerâ—tur Deus Heb. 13 Vvas Primasius also S. Augustines scholer a Papist for vsing this text and al the rest that haue done the like Vvas S. Cyprian a Papist for vsing so often this speach promereri Dominum iustis operibus poâ—nitentia c. or is there any difference but that S. Cyptian vseth it as a deponent more latinly the other as a passiue lesse finely Vvas it Papistrie to say Senior for Presbyter Ministrantibus for sacrificantibus or liturgiam celebrantibus simulacbris for idolis fides tuaete saluum fecit sometime for sanum fecit Or shal we thinke he was a Caluinist for translating thus as they thinke he was a Papist when any
done on the crosse as it is the self same thing that is offered in the Sacrament and on the crosse whereby you may see the peruersitie of the Protestants or their ignorance that thinke it therfore not to be Christs body because it is a memorie of his body or a figure of his body vpon the crosse nor to be a true sacrifice because it is a commemoratiue sacrifice for as the thing that more liuely neerely and truely resembleth or representeth is a better figure then that which shadoweth it a far of so this his body in the Sacramēt is more perfectly a figure of Christs body sacrifice then any other Christ him self the Sonne of God is a figure and character of his fathers person being yet of the self same substance and Christs body transfigured on the holy Mount was a figure and resemblance of his person glorified in heauen euen so is his body in the Sacrament to a faithful man that knovveth by his beleefe grounded on Christs owne vvord that in the one forme is his body in the other his bloud the most perfect representatiō of his death that can be As for the sacrifice it is no lesse a true Sacrifice because it is commemoratiue of Christs Passion then those of the old Testament vvere the lesse true because they vvere prefiguratiue for that is the condition annexed to al Sacrifice of euery Lavv to represent Christs Passion 20. The nevv Testament in my bloud Moyses tooke the bloud of the first sacrifice that vvas made after the geuing of the Lavv Exod. 24. and vvith bloud confirmed the couenant and compact betvvixt God and his people and so dedicated the old Testament vvhich vvithout bloud saith S Paul vvas not dedicated Moyses put that bloud also into a stāding peece and sprinkled al the people c. vvith the same said these formal vvordes This is the bloud of the couenant c. or as it is read in S. Paul of the Testament vvhich God hath deliuered vnto you Vnto al vvhich Christ in this action about the second part of this his sacrifice in euery of the Euangelists most cleerely alludeth expressing that the new Testament is begonne and dedicated in his bloud in the Chalice no lesse then the old vvas dedicated begonne and ratified in that bloud of calues conteined in the goblet of Moyses vvith vvhich his ovvne bloud he sprinkled invvardly his Apostles as the first fruits of the new Testament imitating the wordes of Moyses and saying This is the Chalice the new Testament c. which the other Euangelists spake more plainly This is my bloud of the new Testament By al which it is most certaine that Christes bloud in the Chalice is the bloud of Sacrifice and that in this sacrifice of the altar consisteth the external religion and proper seruice of the new Testamēt no lesse then the soueraine worship of God in the old Law did cōsist in the sacrifices of the same For though Christes sacrifice on the Crosse and his bloud shed for vs there bed the general price redemption and satisfaction for vs all and is the last and perfectest sealing or confirmation of the new law and Testament yet the seruice and Sacrifice which the people of the new Testament might resort vnto could not be that violent action of the Crosse but this on the Altar which by Christes owne appointment is and shal be the eternal office of the new Testament and the continual application of al the benefites of his Passion vnto vs. 20. Which shal be shed It is much to be obserued that the relatiue Vvhich in these vvordes is not gouerned or ruled as some vvould perhaps thinke of the novvne bloud but of the vvord chalice which is most plaine by the Greeke Which taketh away al cauillations and shifts from the Protestants both against the real presence and the true Sacrificing For it sheweth euidently that the bloud as the contents of the chalice or as in the chalice is shed for vs for so the Greeke readeth in the present tense and not onely as vpon the crosse And therfore as it foloweth thereof inuincibly that it is no bare figure but his bloud in deede so it ensueth necessarily◠that it is a Sacrifice and propitiatorie because the chalice that is the Bloud contained in the same is shed for our sinnes For al that know the maner of the Scriptures speaches know also that this Bloud to be shed for sinne to be sacrificed for propitiation or for pardon of sinnes And this text proueth al this so plainely that Beza turneth him self roundly vpon the Holy Euangelist charging him with Soloecisme or false Greeke or els that the wordes which yet he cōfesseth to be in al copies Greeke and Latin are thrust into the text out of some other place vvhich he rather standeth vpon then that S. Luke should speake incongruously in so plaine a matter And therfore he saith plainely that it can not be truely said neither of the chalice it self nor of the contents thereof vvhich is in deede to giue the lie to the blessed Euangelist or to deny this to be Scripture So cleere is the Scripture for vs so miserable flights and shifts is falshod put vnto God be thanked 24. Contention The Apostles perceiuing Christs departure from them and his kingdom to be neere as infirme men and not yet endewed with the spirit of God began to haue emulation and cogitations of Superiority one ouer an other which our Maister represseth in them by exhortation to humility and by his owne example that being their Lord yet so lately serued them not forbidding Maioritie or Superioritie in them but pride tyranny and contempt of their inferiours 31. Simon Simon Lastly to put them out of doubt he calleth Peter twise by name and telling him the Diuels desire to sifte and trie them al to the vttermost as he did that night saith that he hath specially prayed for him to this end that his faith should neuer faile and that he being once conuerted should after that for euer confirme establish or vphold the rest in their faith which is to say that Peter is that man whom he would make Superiour ouer them and the whole Church Whereby we may learne that it was thought fit in the prouidence of God that he who should be the head of the Church should haue a special priuilege by Christes praier and promes neuer to faile in faith and that none other either Apostle Bishop or priest may chalenge any such singular or special prerogatiue either of his Office or person otherwise then ioyning in faith with Peter and by holding of him The danger saith S. Leo was common to al the Apostles but our Lord tooke special care of Peter that the state of al the rest might be more sure if the head were inuincible God so dispensing the aide of his grace that the assurance and strength which Christ gaue to
verb. Do. sec Mat. Tertul. li. 4. cont Marc. Chrys ho. 2. in 2. ad Tim. in fine ho. de prodit Iuda to 3. Grego Nyss in orat Catech. Damase li. 4. c. 14. 24. My body Vvhen the vvordes of Consecration be by tho said impietie of the Protestants thus remoued from the elements no maruel if Christes holy body and bloud be not there or that it is novv no more a Sacrament but common bread and vvine So they that vniustly charge the Cath. Church vvith defrauding the people of one peece of the Sacramēt haue in very deede left no part nor spice of Sacrament neither folovving Christ as they pretend nor S. Paul nor any Euangelist but their owne detestable Secte hauing boldly defaced the vvhole institution not in any accidental indifferent circunstances but in the very substance and al. The right name is gone the due elements both gone no blessing or consecration or other action ouer them the formes be gone and consequently the body and bloud the Sacrament and the Sacrifice 24. This doe By these vvordes authoritie and povver is giuen to the Apostles and by the like in the Sacrament of Orders to al lavvful Priests onely No maruel then that the nevv heretical Ministers being lay men giue the people nothing but bare bread and vvine profane naked and natural elements void of Sacrament and al grace See the Annotation vpon S. Luke chap. 22 19. 24. Take and eate This pertaineth to the receiuing of those things vvhich by consecration are present and sacrificed before as vvhen the people or Priests in the old Lavv did eate the hostes offered or part thereof they vvere made partakers of the sacrifice done to God before And this is not the substance or being or making of the Sacrament or Sacrifice of Christes body and bloud but it is the vse and application to the receiuer of the things vvhich vvere made and offered to God before There is a difference betvvixt the making of a medecine or the substance and ingredience of it and the taking of it Novv the receiuing being but a consequence or one of the endes vvhy the Sacrament vvas made the meane to apply it vnto vs the Aduersaries vnlearnedly make it al and some ad therfore improperly name the vvhole Sacrament and ministration therof by calling it the Communion Vvhich name they giue also rather then any other to make the ignorant beleeue that many must communicate together as though it vvere so called for that it is common to many By which collusion they take avvay the receiuing of the Priest alone of the sicke alone of reseruing the consecrated Host and the vvhole Sacrament Against vvhich deceite knovv that this part of the MASSE is not called Communiō for that many should concurre together alwaies in the external Sacrament but for that vve do communicate or ioyne in vnitie and perfect felovvship of one body vvith al Christian men in the vvorld vvith al vve say that eate it through the vvhole Church and not vvith them onely vvhich eate vvith vs at one time And this fellovvship riseth of that that vve be euery time we receiue either alone or vvith companie partakers of that one body vvhich is receiued through out al the vvorld It is called cōmunion saith S. Damascent so in deede it is for that by it vve comunicate vvith Christ be partakers of his flesh diuinitie by it doe cōcommunicate and are vnited one vvith an other onely let vs take heeds that vve do not participat vvith heretikes And vvhen the Apostle saith that al be one bread and one body that are partakers of one Bread he meaneth not of them onely that communicate at one time and place but that al be so that communicate in vnitie through the whole Church Thē the name Communion is as ignorantly vsed of them as the name of Supper 26. You shal shevv Vpon this vvord the Heretikes fondly ground their false supposition that this Sacrament can not rightly be ministred or made vvithout a sermon of the death of Christ and that this and other Sacraments in the Church be not profitable when they be ministred in a strange language As though the grace force operation actiuitie together vvith the iustruction and representation of the things which they signifie vvere not in the very substance matter forme vse and vvorke it self of euery of the Sacraments and as though preaching vvere not one vvay to shevv Christes Passion and the Sacraments an other vvay namely this Sacrament conteining in the very kindes of the elements and the action a most liuely representation of Christes death As vvisely might they say that neither Abels sacrifice nor the Paschal lambe could signifie Christes death vvithout a Sermon 27. Guilty of the body First herevpon marke vvel that il men receiue the body and bloud of Christ be they infidels or il liuers For in this case they could not be guilty of that vvhich they receiue not Secondly that it could not be so heinous an offense for any man to receiue a peece of bread or a cuppe of vvine though they vvere a true Sacrament For it is a deadly sinne to receiue any Sacramēt with vvil intentiō to cōtinevv in sinne or vvithout repentance of former sinnes but yet by the vnvvorthy receiuing of no other Sacrament is man guilty of Christes body and bloud but here vvhere the vnvvorthy as S. Chrysostom saith doth vilany to Christes ovvne person as the Ievves or Gentiles did that crucified it Chrys ho. de non contemn Ec. c. Ho. 60 61 ad po Antioch Vvhich inuincibly proueth against the Heretikes that Christ is really present 28. Let him proue A man must examine his life diligently vvhether he be in any mortal sinne and must confesse him self of euery offense vvhich he knovveth or feareth to be deadly before he presume to come to the holy Sacrament For so the Apostles doctrine here vvith the continual custom of the Cath. Church and the Fathers example binde him to doe Cypr. de laps nu 7. Aug. Eccl. dog c. 53. 29. Not diseruing the body That is because he putteth no difference nor distinction betvvixt this high meate and others and therfore S. Augustine saith ep 118. c. 3. that it is he that the Apostle saith shal be damned that doth not by singular veneration or adoration make a difference betvvene this meate and al others And againe in Psal 98. No man eateth it before he adore it And S. Ambrose li. 3 c. 12 de Sp. San. We adore the flesh of Christ in the Mysteries S. Chrysostome ho. 24 in 1 Cor. We adore him on the altar as the Sages did in the manger S. Nazianzene in Epitaph Gorgoniae My sister called on him vvhich is vvorshipped vpon the altar Theodorete Dial. 2 Inconf The Mystical tokens be adored S. Denys this Apostles scholer made solemne inuocation of the Sacrament after Consecration
the dead that he may be in al things holding the primacie ✠verse 19 because in him it hath vvel pleased al fulnes to inhabite ✠verse 20 and by him to reconcile al things vnto him self pacifying by the bloud of his crosse vvhether the things in earth or the things that are in heauen ✠verse 21 And you vvhereas you vvere sometime alienated and enemies in sense in euil vvorkes ✠verse 22 yet novv he hath reconciled in the body of his flesh by death to present you holy immaculate and blameles before him ✠verse 23 if yet ye coÌ„tinue in the faith grounded and stable and vnmoueable from the hope of the Gospel vvhich you haue heard vvhich is preached among al creatures that are vnder heauen vvhereof I Paul am made a minister ✠verse 24 Vvho novv reioyce in suffering for you and â— do accomplish those things that vvant of the passions of Christ in my flesh for his body vvhich is the CHVRCH ✠verse 25 vvhereof I am made a minister according to the dispensation of Gods vvhich is giuen me tovvard you that I may fulfil the vvord of God ✠verse 26 the mysterie that hath been hidden from vvorldes and generations but novv is manifested to his sainctes ✠verse 27 to vvhoÌ„ God vvould make knowen the riches of the glorie of this sacrament in the Gentiles vvhich is Christ in you the hope of glorie ✠verse 28 vvhom vve preache admonishing euery man and teaching euery man in al vvisedom that vve may present euery man perfect in Christ IESVS ✠verse 29 Vvherein also I labour striuing according to his operation vvhich he vvorketh in me in povver ANNOTATIONS CHAP. I. 24. Dâ—â—â—â—â—plish that â—â—â—â—teth As Christ the head and his body make one person mystical and one full Christ the Church being therfore his plenitude fulâ—es or complement Ephes 1 so the passions of his head and the afflictions of the body and members make one complete masse of passions Vvith such difference for al that betvvene the one sort and the other as the preeminence of the head and specialâ—y such a head aboue the body requireth and giueth And not only these passions vvhich he suffered in him self vvhich vvere fully ended in his death and vverein them selues fully sufficient for the redemption of the vvorld remission of al sinnes but al those vvhich his body and members suffer are his also and of him they receiue the condition qualitie and force to be meritorious and satisfactorie For though there be no insufficiencie in the actions or passions of Christ the head yet his vvisedom vvil and iustice requireth and ordaineth * that his body and members should be fâ—llovves of his passions as they looke to be fellovves of his glorie that so suffering vvith him and by his example they may applâ—e to them selues and others the general medicine of Christes merites and satisfactions as it is effectually and applied to vs by Sacraments sacrifice and other vvaies also 〈…〉 sor being no more iniurious to Christeâ— death then the other notvvithstanding the vaine clamours of the Protestants that vvould vnder pretence of Christes Passion take avvay the valure of al good deedes Herevpon it is plaine novv that this accomplishment of the vvants of Christes Passions vvhich the Apostle and other Saincts make vp in their flesh is not meanâ— but of the penal and satisfactorie vvorkes of Christ in his members euery good man adding continually and specially Martyrs somevvhat to accomplish the full measure thereof and these be the plenitude of his passions and satisfactions as the Church is the plenitude of his person therfore these also through the communion of Saincts and the societie that is not onely betvvene the head and the body but also betvvene one members and an other are not only satisfactorie and many vvaies profitable for the sufferers them selues but also for other their fellovv-members in Christ for though one member can not merite for an other properly yet may one beare the burden and discharge the debt of an other both by the lavv of God and nature and it vvas ridiculous Heresie of Vvicleffe to deny the same Yea as vve see here the passions of Saincts are alvvaies suffered for the common good of the vvhole body and sometimes vvithal by the sufferers special intention they are applicable to special persons one or many as here the Apostle ioyeth in his passions for the Collossians in an other place his afflictions be for the saluation of the Corinthians sometimes he vvisheth to be Anatheâ—â—a that is according to Origens exposition iâ— li. 〈◊〉 ho. 10. 24. a sacrifice for the Ievves and he often speaketh of his death as of a libation host or offering as the fathers do of al Martyrs passions Al vvhich dedicated and sanctified in Christes bloud and sacrifice make the plenitude of his Passion and haue a forcible crie intercession and satisfaction for the Church and the particular necessities thereof In vvhich as some do abound in good vvorkes and satisfactions as S. Paul vvho reckeneth vp his afflictions and glorieth in them 2 Cor. 11 and Iob vvho auoucheth that his penalties farre surmounted his sinnes and our Ladie much more vvho neuer sinned and yet suffered so great dolours so others some do vvant and are to be holpen by the aboundance of their fellovv-members Vvhich entercourse of spiritual offices and the recompense of the vvants of one part by the store of the other is the ground of the old libels of Indulgence vvhereof is treated before our of S. Cyprian See the Annotations 2 Cor. 2. v. 10 and of al indulgences or pardons vvhich the Church daily dispenseth vvith great iustice and mercie by their hands in vvhom Christ hath put the vvord of our reconcilement to vvhom he hath committed the keies to keepe and vse his sheepâ— to seede his mysteries and al his goods to dispense his povver to binde and loose his commission to remine and reteine and the stevvardship of his familie to giue euery one their meate and sustâ—nance in due season CHAP. II. He is careful for them though he vvere neuer vvith them that they rest in the vvonderful vvisedom vvhich is in Christian religion and be not caried avvay either vvith Philosophie to 〈◊〉 Christ and to sacrifice to Angelâ—â— or vvith Iudaisme to receive any 〈…〉 of Moyses lavv verse 1 FOR I vvil haue you knovv brethren vvhat maner of care I haue for you and for them that are at Laodicia and vvhosoeuer haue not seen my face in the flesh ✠verse 2 that their hartes may be comforted instructed in charitie vnto al the riches of the fulnes of vnderstaÌ„ding vnto the knovvledge of the mysterie of God the Father of Christ IESVS ✠verse 3 in vvhom be al the treasures of vvisedom and knovvledge hidde ✠verse 4 But this I say that no man deceiue you in loftines of vvordes ✠verse 5 For although I
degentes is bold to call the Emperour Constantius being an Arian Heretike Antichrist for making him self Principem Episcoporum Prince ouer the Bishops and President of Ecclesiastical iudgements c. The other cause is for impugning Christes Priesthod vvhich is only or most properly exercised in earth by the sacrifice of the holy Masse instituted for the commemoration of his death for the external exhibition of godly honour to the B. Trinitie vvhich kinde of external vvorship by sacrifice no lavvful people of God euer lacked And by these tvvo things you may easily perceiue that the Heretikes of these daies do more properly and neerely prepare the vvay to Antichrist and to extreme desolation then euer any before their special heresie being against the spiritual Primacie of Popes and Bishops and against the sacrifice of the altar in vvhich tvvo the soueraintie of Christ in earth consisteth 6. What letteth S. Augustine li. 20 c. 19 de ciuit del professeth plainely that he vnderstandeth not these vvordes not that that folovveth of the mysterie of iniquitie and least of al that vvhich the Apostle addeth Only that he vvhich holdeth novv do hold c. Vvhich may humble vs al and stay the confident rashnes of this time namely of Heretikes that boldly feine hereof vvhatsoeuer is agreable to their heresie and phantasie The Apostle had told the Thessalonians before by vvord of mouth a secret point vvhich he vvould not vtter in vvritting and therfore referreth them to his former talke The mysterie of iniquitie is coÌ„monly referred to Heretikes vvho vvorke to the same and do that that Antichrist shal do but yet not openly but in couert and vnder the cloke of Christes name the Scriptures the vvord of the Lord shevv of holines c. Vvhereas Antichrist him self shal openly attempt and atchieue the foresaid desolation and Satan novv seruing his turne by Heretikes vnderhand shal tovvard the last end vtter reueale bring him forth openly and that is here to be reuealed that is to appeare in his ovvne person These other vvordes Only that he vvhich novv holdeth hold Some expound of the Emperour during vvhose continuance in his state God shal not permit Antichrist to come meaning that the very Empire shal be vvholy desolate destroied and taken avvay before or by his comming vvhich is more then a defection from the same vvhereof vvas spoken before for there shal be a reuolt from the Church also but it shal not be vtterly destroied Others say that it is an admonition to al faithful to hold fast their faith and not to be beguiled by such as vnder the name of Christ or Scriptures seeke to deceiue them til they that novv pretend religion and the Gospel end in a plaine breach reuolt and open apostasie by the appearance of Antichrist vvhom al Heretikes serue in mysterie that is couertly and in the Diuels meaning though the vvorld seeth it not nor them selues at the beginning thought it as novv euery day more more al men perceiue they tend to plaine Atheisme and Antichristianisme 9. In al povver Satan vvhose povver to him is abridged by Christ shal then â—e let loose and shal assist Antichrist in al maner of signes vvonders and false miracles vvhereby many shal be seduced not only Ievves But al such as be deceiued and caried avvay by vulgar speache only of Heretikes that can vvorke no miracles much more shal folovv this man of sinne doing so great vvonders And such both novv do solovv Heretikes and then shal receiue Antichrist that deserue so to be forsaken of God by their forsaking of the vnitie and happie fellovvship of Saincts in the Catholike Church vvhere onely is the Charitie of truth as the Apostle here speaketh 15. Traditions Not onely the things vvritten and set dovvne in the holy Scriptures but al other truthes and pointes of religion vttered by vvord of mouth and deliuered or giuen by the Apostles to their scholers by tradition be so here approued and els vvhere in the Scripture it self that the Heretikes purposely guilfully and of il coÌ„science that belike reprehendeth them refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiastical and most vsual vvord Tradition euer-more vvhen it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke vvord but vvhen it soundeth in their fond phantasie against the traditions of the Church as in deede in true sense it neuer doth there they vse it most gladly Here therfore and in the like places that the reader might not so easily like of Traditions vnvvritten here commended by the Apostle they translate it Instructions Constitutions Ordinances and vvhat they can inuent els to hide the truth from the simple or vnvvarie Reader vvhose translations haue no other end but to beguile such by art and conueiance But S. Chrysostom ho. 4 in 1 Thes 2. and the other greeke scholies or commentaries say herevpon both vvritten and vnvvritten precepts the Apostles gaue by tradition and both be vvorthy of obseruation S. Basil De Sp. Sancto c. 29 in principio thus I account it Apostolike to continevv famely euen in vnvvritten traditions and to proue this he alleageth this place of S. Paul In the same booke c. 17 he saieth If vve once go about to reiect vnvvritten customs as things of no importance vve shal are vve be avvare doe damage to the principal partes of the faith and bring the preaching of the Gospel to a naked name And for example of these necessarie traditions he nameth the signe of the Crosse praying tovvards the east the vvords spoken at the eleuatioÌ„ of sheavving of the holy Eucharist vvith diuerse cerimonies vsed before after the consecration the halovving of the sont the blessing of the oile the anointing of the baptized vvith the same the three immersions into the font the vvordes of abrenuntiatioÌ„ and exorcismes of the partie that is to be baptised c. Vvhat scripture saith he taught these and such like none truly al comming of secret and silent tradition vvherevvith our fathers thought it meete to couer such mysteries S. Hierom Dialog cont Lucif c. 4. et ep 28 ad Liâ—iniuÌ„ reckeneth vp diuers the like traditioÌ„s vvilling men to attribute to the Apostles such customs as the Church hath receiued in diuers christian countries S. Augustine esteemeth the Apostolike traditions so much that he plainely affirmeth in sundrie places not onely the obseruation of certaine festiuities fastes ceremonies whatsoeuer other solemnities vsed in the Catholike Church to be holy profitable and Apostolike though they be notvvritten at al in the scriptures but he often also vvriteth that many of the articles of our religion and pointes of highest importance are not so much to be proued by scriptures as by tradition namely auouching that in no vvise vve could beleeue that children in their infancie should be baptized if it vvere not an Apostolical tradition De Gen. ad lit li.
fathers in the prophets ✠verse 2 last of al in these daies hath spoken to vs in his Sonne vvhom he hath appointed heire of al by vvhom he made also the vvorldes ✠verse 3 * Vvho being the brightnesse of his glorie and ″ the figure of his substance carying al things by the vvord of his povver making purgation of sinnes sitteth on the right hand of the Maiestie in the high places ✠verse 4 being made so much better then Angels as he hath inherited a more excellent name aboue them ✠verse 5 For to vvhich of the Angels hath he said at any time Thou art my sonne to day haue I begotten thee and againe I vvil be to him a father and he shal be to me a sonne ✠verse 6 And vvhen againe he bringeth in the first begotten into the vvorld he saith And â— let al the Angels of God adore him ✠verse 7 And to the Angels truely he saith He that maketh his Angels spirites and his ministers a flame of fire ✠verse 8 But to the Sonne Thy throne ô God for euer euer a rod of equitie the rod of thy kingdom ✠verse 9 Thou hast loued iustice and hated iniquitie therfore thee God thy God hath anointed vvith the oile of exultation aboue thy fellovves ✠verse 10 And Thou in the beginning ô Lord didst found the earth and the vvorkes of thy handes are the heauens ✠verse 11 They shal perish but thou shalt continue and they shal al vvaxe old as a garment ✠verse 12 And as a vesture shalt thou chaunge them they shal be changed but thou art the self same and thy yeres shal not faile ⊢ ✠verse 13 But to vvhich of the Angels said he at any time Sit on my right hand vntil I make thine enemies the footestoole of thy feete ✠verse 14 Are they not al ministring spirits sent to minister for them vvhich shal receiue the inheritance of saluation ANNOTATIONS CHAP. I. 3. The figures To be the figure of his substance signifieth nothing els but that vvhich S. Paul speaketh in other vvordes to the Phillippians c. 2. v 6. that he is the forme and most expresse resemblance of his fathers substance So S. Ambrose and others expound it and the Greeke vvord Character is very significant to that purpose Note also by this place that the Sonne though he be a figure of his â—athers substance is notvvithstanding of the same substance So Christes body in the Sacrament and his mystical death and sacrifice in the same though called a figure image or representation of Christes visible body and sacrifice vpon the Crosse yet may be and is the self same in substance 6. Let al the Angels adore The Heretikes maruel that vve adore Christ in the B. Sacrament vvhen they might learne by this place that vvheresoeuer his person is there it ought to be adored both of men and Angels And vvhere they say it vvas not made present in the Sacrament nor instituted to be adored vve ansvver that no more vvas he incarnate purposely to be adored but yet straight vpon his descending from heauen it vvas the duety both of Angels and al other creatures to adore him CHAP. II. He inferreth of the foresaid that it shal be incomparably more damnable for them to neglect the nevv Testament then the old 3 considering the irrefragable authoritie of the Apostles also 5 Then he prosecuteth the excellencie of Christ aboue the Angels 9 vvho neuertheles vvas made lesser then Angels to suffer and die for men to destroy the dominion of the Diuel 15 to deliuer men from feare of death 17 and to be a fitte Priest for men verse 1 THERFORE more aboundantly ought vve to obserue those things vvhich vve haue heard lest perhaps vve runne out ✠verse 2 For if the vvord that vvas spoken by Angels became sure and al preuarication and disobedience hath receiued a iust retribution of revvard ✠verse 3 hovv shal vve escape if vve neglect so great saluation vvhich vvhen it vvas begonne to be declared by our Lord of them that heard vvas confirmed on vs ✠verse 4 * God vvithal testifying by signes vvonders and diuers miracles distributions of the holy Ghost according to his vvil ✠verse 5 For not to Angels hath God made subiect the world to come whereof vve speake ✠verse 6 But one hath testified in a certaine place saying Vvhat is man that thou art mindeful of him or the sonne of man that thou visitest him ✠verse 7 Thou didst minish him litle lesse then Angels with glorie and honour thou hast crovvned him and constituted him ouer the vvorkes of thy handes ✠verse 8 Al things hast thou made subiect vnder his feete For in that he subiected al things to him he left nothing not subiect to him But novv vve see not as yet al things subiected to him ✠verse 9 But * him that vvas a litle lessened vnder the Angels vve see IESVS because of the passion of death crovvned vvith glorie and honour that through the grace of God he might tast death for al. ✠verse 10 For it became him for vvhom al things and by vvhom al things that had brought many children into glorie to consummate the author of their saluation by his passion ✠verse 11 For he that sanctifieth and they that be sanctified al of one For the which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethreÌ„ ✠verse 12 saying I vvil declare thy name to my brethren in the middes of the Church vvil I verse 13 praise thee And againe Ivvil haue affiance in him And againe Behold here am I and my children vvhom God hath giuen me ✠verse 14 Therfore because the children haue communicated vvith flesh bloud him self also in like maner hath been partaker of the same that * by death he might destroy him that had the empire of death that is to say the Deuil ✠verse 15 and might deliuer them that by the feare of death through al their life vvere subiect to seruitude ✠verse 16 For no vvhere doth he take Angels but the seede of Abraham he taketh ✠verse 17 Vvherevpon he ought in al things to be like vnto his brethren that he might become a merciful and faithful high Priest before God that he might repropitiate the sinnes of the people ✠verse 18 For in that vvherein him self suffered and vvas tempted he is able to helpe them also that are tempted CHAP. III. By example of Christ vvho is incomparably more excellent then Moyses also he exhorteth them to be faithful vnto God 7 Their revvard shal be to enter into euerlasting rest if they perseuere as contrarievvise to be excluded as vvas shadowed in their forefathers in the vvildernes if they sinne and become incredulous verse 1 WHEREFORE holy brethren partakers of the heauenly vocation
an external Priesthod or Christes death to abolish the same for this is a demonstration that if Christ haue abolished Priesthod he hath abolished the nevv lavv vvhich is the nevv Testament and state of Grace vvhich as Christian Commonvvealths liue vnder Neither vvere it true that the Priesthod vvere traÌ„slated vvith the Lavv if al external Priesthod ended by Christes death vvhere the nevv lavv began for so the lavv should not depend on Priesthod but dure vvhen al Priesthod vvere ended vvhich is against S. Paules doctrine Furthermore it is to be noted that this legitimation or putting Communities vnder lavv and Priesthod of vvhat order soeuer is no othervvise but ioyning one vvith an other in one homage or sacrifice external vvhich is the proper act of Priesthod for as no lavvful state can be vvithout priesthod so no priesthod can be vvithout sacrifice And vve meane alvvaies of Priesthod sacrifice taken in their ovvne proper signification as here S. Paul taketh them for the constitution difference alteration or traÌ„slation of states and lavves rise not vpon any mutation of spiritual or metaphorically taken Priesthod or sacrifice but vpon those things in proper acception as it is most plaine Lastly it foloweth of this that though Christ truely sacrificed him self vpon the Crosse there also a Priest according to the order of Melchisedec and there made the ful redemption of the vvorld confirmed and consummated his compact and Testament and the lavv and priesthod of this his nevv and eternal state by his bloud yet that can not be the forme of sacrifice into vvhich the old Priesthod and sacrifices vvere translated vvherevpon the Apostle inferreth the translation of the Law For they all vvere figures of Christes death and ended in effect at his death yet they vvere not altered into that kind of sacrifice vvhich vvas to be made but once and vvas executed in such a sort that peoples and nations Christened could not meete often to vvorship at it nor haue their law and Priestes constituted in the same though for the honour and duety remembrance and representatioÌ„ thereof not onely vve Christianâ— but also al peoples faithful both of Iewes Gentiles haue had their priesthod and sacrifices according to the difference of their states Vvhich kind of Sacrifices vvere translated one into an other and so no doubt is the Priesthod Leuitical properly turned into the Priesthod and sacrifice of the Church according to Melchisedecks rite and Christes institution in the formes of bread and vvine See the next note 17. A Priest for euer Christ is not called a Priest for euer onely for that his person is eternal or for that he sitteth on the right hand of God and perpetually praieth or maketh intercession for vs or for that the effect of his death is euerlasting for al this proueth not that in proper signification his Priesthod is perpetual but according to the iudgement of al the fathers grounded vpon this deepe and diuine discourse of S. Paul and vpon the very nature definition and propriety of Priesthod and the excellent act and order of Melchisedec and the state of the new law he is a Priest for euer according to Melchisedecks order specially in respect of the sacrifice of his holy body and bloud instituted at his last supper and executed by his commission commaundement and perpetual concurrence vvith his Priests in the formes of bread and vvine in vvhich things onely the said high Priest Melchisedec did sacrifice For though S. Paul make no expresse mention hereof because of the depth of the mysterie and their incredulity or feeblenesse to vvhom he vvrote yet it is euident in the iudgement of all the learned fathers vvithout exception that euer vvrote either vpon this epistle or vpon the 14 of Genesis or the Psalme 109 or by occasion haue treated of the sacrifice of the altar that the eternity and proper act of Christes Priesthod and consequently the immutability of the new law consisteth in the perpetual offering of Christes body and bloud in the Church Which thing is so vvell knowen to the Aduersaries of Christes Church and Priesthod and so graunted that they be forced impudently to cauill vpon certaine Hebrue particles that Melchisedec did not offer in bread and vvine yea and vvhen that vvill not serue plainely to deny him to haue been a Priest vvhich is to giue checkmate to the Apostle and to ouerthrow all his discourse Thus vvhiles these vvicked men pretend to defend Christes onely Priesthod they in deede abolish as much as in them lieth the vvhole order office and state of his eternall law and Priesthod Arnobius saith By the mysterie of bread and vvine he vvas made a Priest for euer And againe The eternal memorie by vvhich he gaue the food of his body to them that feare him in psal 109. 110. Lactatius In the Church he must needes haue his eternal Priesthod according to the order of Melabisedec Li. 14. Institut S. Hierom to Luagrius Aarons Priesthod had an end bus Melchisedecks that is Christes and the Churches is perpetuall both for the time past and to come S. Chrysostom therfore calleth the Churches sacrifice hostiaâ— inconsumptibâ—em an host or sacrifice that can not be consumed ho. 17 in 9 Hebr. S. Cyprian bostiam qua sublatae nulla esset futura religio an host vvhich being taken away there could be no religion de Canaâ— Dâ—mini nu 2. Emissenus perpetuam oblationem perpetuò currentem redemptionem a perpetual oblation and a redemption that runneth or continueth euerlastingly ho. 5 de Pasch And our Sauiour expresseth so much in the very institution of the B. Sacrament of his body and bloud specially vvhen he calleth the later kind the nevv Testament in his bloud signifying that as the old law vvas established in the bloud of beastes so the new vvhich is his eternal Testament should be dedicated and perpetual in his owne bloud not onely as it vvas shed on the Crosse but as giuen in the Chalice And therfore into this sacrifice of the altar saith S. Augustine li. 17 de Ciuit. c. 20. S. Leo ser 8 de Passione and the rest vvere the old sacrifices to be translated See S. Cyprian ep 63 ad Cecil nu 2. Ambrose de Sacram. li. 5. 6. 4. S. Augustine in Psal 33. Conc. â— and li. 17. de Ciuit. c. 17. S. Hierom ep 17. c. 2. ep 126. Epiph. har 55. Theodoret in Psal 109. Damascene li. 4. c. 14. Finally if any of the fathers or all the fathers had either vvisedom grace or intelligence of Gods vvorde and mysteries this is the truth If nothing vvil serue our Aduersaries Christ Iesus confound them and defend his eternal Priesthod and state of his new Testament established in the same 18. Of the former commaundement The vvhole law of Moyses conteining all their old Priesthod sacrifice sacraments and ceremonies is called the Old commaundement and the new Testament conteining
the sacrifice of Christes body and bloud and al the sacraments and graces giuen by the same is named the Nevv mandatum for vvhich our forefathers called the Thursday in the holy vveke Maundy thursday because that in it the new law and Testament was dedicated in the Chalice of his bloud the old mandatum law Priesthod and sacrifices for that they vvere insufficient and vnperfect being taken avvay and this new sacrifice after the order of Melchisedec giuen in the place thereof 19. The introduction Euer obserue that the abrogation of the old law is not an abolishing of al Priesthod of al Priesthod but an introductiō of a new conteining the hope of eternal things vvhere the old had but temporal 21. With an othe This othe signifieth the infallible and absolute promis of the eternitie of the new Priesthod and state of the Church Christ by his death and bloud shed in the sacrifice of the Crosse confirming it sealing it and making him self the surety and pledge therof For though the new Testament vvas instituted giuen and dedicated in the Supper yet the vvarrant confirmation and eternal operation therof vvas atchieued vpon the Crosse in the one oblation and one general and euer lasting redemption there made 23. Being many The Protestants not vnderstanding this place feine very folishly that the Apostle should make this difference betvvixt the old state and the new that in the old there were many Priests in the new none at all but Christ Which is against the Prophet Esay specially prophecying of the Priests of the new Testament as S. Hierom declareth vpon the same place in these vvordes You shal be called the Priests of God the ministers of our God shal it be said to your it taketh away al visible Priesthod consequently the lawful state that the Church and Gods people haue in earth vvith al Sacraments and external vvorship The Apostle then meaneth first that the absolute sacrifice of cōsummation perfection and vniuersal redemption vvas but one once done and by one onely Priest done and therfore it could not be any of the sacrifices or al the sacrifices of the Iewes law or vvrought by any or by all of them because they vvere a number at once and succeding one an other euery of their offices and functions ending by their death and could not vvorke such an eternal redemption as by Christ onely vvas vvrought vpon the Crosse Secondly S. Paul insinuateth therevpon that Christ neuer loseth the dignitie or practise of his eternal Priesthod by death nor othervvise neuer yeldeth it vp to any neuer hath successors after him that may enter into his roome or right of Priesthod as Aaron and al other had in the Leuitical Priesthod but that him self vvorketh and concurreth vvith his ministers the Priests of the new Testament in al their actes of Priesthod as vvel of sacrifice as Sacrament blessing preaching praying and the like vvhat so euer This therfore vvas the fault of the Hebrues that they did not acknowledge their Leuitical sacrifices and Priesthod to be reformed and perfited by Christes sacrifice on the Crosse and against them the Apostle onely disputeth and not against our Priests of holy Church or the number of them vvho al confesse their Priesthod and al exercises of the same to depend vpon Christes onely perpetual Priesthod 27. This did he once This is the special preeminence of Christ that the offereth for other mens sinnes onely hauing none of his owne to offer for as al other Priests both of the old and new law haue And this againe is the special dignitie of his owne person not communicable to any other of vvhat order of Priesthod so euer that he by his death which is the onely oblation that is by the Apostle declared to be irreiterable in it self paied the one full sufficient ransom for the redemption of all sinnes CHAP. VIII Out of the same Psalme 109 he vrgeth this also Sit thou on my right hand shevving that the Leuitical tabernacle on earth vvas but a shadovv of his true Tabernacle in heauen vvithout vvhich he should not be a Priest at all 6 Vvhereas he is of a better Priesthod the◠they as also he proueth by the excellencie of the nevv Testament aboue the old verse 1 BVT the summe concerning those things vvhich be said is Vve haue such an high priest vvho is sette on the right hand of the seate of maiestie in the heauens ✠verse 2 a minister of the holies and of the true tabernacle vvhich our Lord pight not man ✠verse 3 For euery high priest is appointed to offer giftes and hostes vvherfore it is ″ necessarie that he also haue some thing that he may offer ✠verse 4 ″ if then he vvere vpon the earth neither vvere he a priest vvhereas there vvere that did offer giftes according to the Lavv ✠verse 5 that serue the exampler shadow of ″ heauenly things As it vvas ansvvered Moyses vvhen he finished the tabernacle * See quod he that thou make al things according to the exampler vvhich vvas shevved thee in the mount ✠verse 6 But novv he hath obtained a better ministerie by so much as he is mediatour of a better testament vvhich is established in better promises ✠verse 7 For if that former had been void of fault there should not certes a place of a secōd been sought ✠verse 8 For blaming them he saith Behold the daies shal come saith our Lord and I vvil consummate vpon the house of Israel and vpon the house of Iuda a nevv Testament ✠verse 9 not according to the testament vvhich I made to their fathers in the day that I tooke their hand to bring them out of the land of Aegypt because they did not continue in my testament and I neglected them saith our Lord. ✠verse 10 For this is the testament vvhich I vvil dispose to the house of Israel after those daies saith our Lord Giuing my lavves ″ into their minde in their hart vvil I superscribe them and I vvil be ″ their God and they shal be my people ✠verse 11 and eueryone ″ shall not teach his neighbour and euery one his brother saying Knovv our Lord because al shal knovv me from the lesser to the greater of them ✠verse 12 because I wil be merciful to their iniquities their sinnes I wil not now remember ✠verse 13 And in saying a nevv the former he hath made old And that vvhich grovveth auncient and vvaxeth old is nigh to vtter decay ANNOTATIONS CHAP. VIII 3. Necessarie that he also Euen now being in heauen because he is a Bishop and Priest he must needes haue somewhat to offer and vvherein to do sacrifice and that not in spiritual sort onely for that could not make him a Priest of any certaine order And it is most false and vvicked to hold vvith the Caluinistes that Melchisedecks Priesthod
vvas vvholy spiritual For then Christs death vvas not a corporal external visible and truely named sacrifice neither could Christ or Melchisedec be any otherwise a Priest then euery faithful man is vvhich to hold as the Caluinists folowing their owne doctrine must needes do is directly against the Scriptures and no lesse against Christes one oblation of his body vpon the Crosse then it is against the daily sacrifice of his body vpon the altar Therfore he hath a certaine host in external and proper maner to make perpetual oblation thereby in the Church for visible and external act of sacrificing in heauen he doth not exercise 4. If vpon the earth It is by his death and resurrection to life againe that his body is become apt and fitte in such diuine sort to be sacrificed perpetually For if he had liued in mortal sort still that vvay of mystical representation of breaking his body and separating the bloud from the same could not haue been agreable and so the Church and Christian people should haue lacked a priesthod and sacrifice Christ him self should not haue been a Priest of a peculiar order but either must haue offered in the things that Aarons Priests did or els haue been no Priest at all For to haue offered onely spiritually as all faithful men do that could not be ynough for his vocation and our redemption and state of the new Testament How his flesh vvas made fit to be offered and eaten in the B. Sacrament by his death see Isychius li. 1 in leuit cap. 2. 5. Heauenly things As the Church or state of the new Testament is commonly called Regnum coelorum Dei in the Scriptures so these heauenly things be probably taken by learned men for the mysteries of the new Testament And it seemeth that the paterne giuen to Moyses to frame his tabernacle by vvas the Church rather then the heauens them selues al S. Paules discourse tending to shew the difference betwixt the new Testament and the old and not to make comparison betwene the state of heauen and the old law Though incidently because the condition of the new Testament more neerely resembleth the same then the old state doth he sometime may speake somewhat therof also 10. Into their minde This also and the rest folowing is fulfilled in the Church and is the proper effect of the new Testament vvhich is the grace and spirit of loue graffed in the hartes of the faithful by the holy Ghost vvorking in the Sacraments and sacrifice of the new law to that effecte 10. Their God This mutual couenant made betwixt God and the faithful is that vvhich vvas dedicated and established first in the chalice of his bloud called therfore the nevv Testament in his bloud and vvhich vvas straight after ratified by the death of the â—â—stator vpon the Crosse 11. Shal not teach So it vvas in the primitiue Church in such specially as vvere the first founders of our new state in Christ And that vvhich vvas verified in the Apostles and other principal men the Apostle speaketh generally as though it vvere so in the vvhole as S. Peter applieth the like out of Ioël and our Sauiour so speaketh vvhen he saith that such as beleeue in him shal vvorke miracles of diuers sortes Christian men then must not abuse this place to make chalenge of new inspirations and so great knowledge that they neede no Scriptures or teaching in this life as some Heretikes doe vvith much like reason and shew of Scriptures as the Protestants haue to refuse external sacrifice And it is no lesse phantastical madnesse to deny external sacrifice sacraments or Priesthod then it is to abolish teaching and preaching CHAP. IX In the old Testament that secular Sanctuarie had tvvo partes the one signifying that time vvith the ceremonies therof for the emundation of the flesh the other signifying heauen vvhich then vvas shut vntil our High priest Christ entered into it and that vvith his ovvne bloud shed for the emundation of our consciences Wherevpon he concludeth the excellencie of his tabernacle and host aboue the old 25 Noting also the differences that he entered but once so effectual vvas that one blouddy offering of himself for euer vvheras the Leuitical High priest entered euery yere once verse 1 THE former also in deede had iustificatioÌ„s of seruice and a secular sanctuarie ✠verse 2 For the tabernacle vvas made the first vvherin vvere the candlestickes and the table and the proposition of Ioaues vvhich is called Holy ✠verse 3 But after the second vele the tabernacle vvhich is called Sancta Sanctorum ✠verse 4 hauing a golden censar and the arke of the testameÌ„t couered about on euery part vvith gold in the vvhich vvas ″ a golden potte hauing Manna and the rod of Aaron that had blossomed * the tables of the testament ✠verse 5 and ouer it vvere * the ″ Cherubins of glorie ouers had ovving the propitiatorie of vvhich things it is not needeful to speake novv particularly ✠verse 6 But these things being so ordered in the first tabernacle in deede the priests alvvaies entered accoÌ„plishing offices of the sacrifices ✠verse 7 But in the second * once a yere the high priest only not vvithout bloud vvhich he offereth for his ovvne and the peoples ignorance ✠verse 8 the holy Ghost signifying this that the vvay of the holies was not yet manifested the former tabernacle as yet standing ✠verse 9 vvhich is a parable of the time present according to vvhich are offered giftes and hostes vvhich can not concerning the conscience make perfect him that serueth ✠verse 10 onely in meates and in drinkes and diuerse baptismes and iustices of the flesh laid on them ″ vntil the time of correction ✠verse 11 But Christ assisting an high Priest of the good things to come by a more ample and more perfect tabernacle not made vvith hand that is not of this creation ✠verse 12 neither by the bloud of goates or of calues but by his ovvne bloud entered in once into the Holies ″ eternal redemption being found ⊢ ✠verse 13 For * if the bloud of goates and of oxen the ashes of an heifer being sprinkled sanctifieth the polluted to the cleansing of the flesh ✠verse 14 hovv much more hath ' the bloud of Christ vvho by the holy Ghost offered himself vnspotted vnto God cleansed ' our conscience from dead vvorkes to serue the liuing God ✠verse 15 And therfore he is the mediatour of the nevv Testament that death being a meane vnto the redemption ″ of these preuarications vvhich vvere vnder the former testament they that are called may receiue the promise of eternal inheritance ⊢ ✠verse 16 For * vvhere there is a testament the death of the testatour must of necessitie come betvvene ✠verse 17 For a testament is confirmed in
vvhile he that is to come vvil come and vvil not slacke ✠verse 38 and my iust ″ liueth of faith ⊢ but if he vvithdravv him self he shal not please my soule ✠verse 39 But vve are not the children of vvithdravving vnto perdition but of faith to the vvinning of the soule ANNOTATIONS CHAP. X. 1. A shadovv The sacrifices and ceremonies of the old law vvere so far from the truth of Christs Sacraments and from giuing spirit grace remission redemption and iustification and therevpon the entrance into heauen and ioyes celestiall that they vvere but mere shadowes vnperfectly and obscurely representing the graces of the new Testament and of Christes death vvhereas all the holy Churches rites and actions instituted by Christ in the Priesthod of the new law conteine and giue grace iustification and life euerlasting to the faithful and vvorthy receiuers and therfore they be not shades or darke resemblances of Christes passion vvhich is the fountaine of all grace and mercie but perfect images and most liuely representations of the same specially the sacrifice of the altar vvhich because it is the same oblation the same host and offered by the same Priest Christ IESVS though by the ministerie of man and in mysterie is the most pure and neere image character and correspondence to the sacrifice of Christes passion both in substance force and effect that can be 2. They should haue ceased If the hostes and offerings of the old law had been of them selues perfect to all effectes of redemption and remission as the Hebrues against vvhom the Apostle disputeth did thinke and had had no relation to Christes sacrifice on the Crosse or any other absolute and vniuersal oblation or remedie for sinne but by and of their owne efficacie could haue generally purged and cleansed man of all sinne and damnation then they should neuer haue needed to be so often repeated and reiterated For being both generally auailable for all by their opinion and particularly applied in as ample sort as they could be to the seueral infirmities of euery offender there had been no sinnes left But sinnes did remaine euen those sinnes for vvhich they had offered sacrifices before notvvithstanding their sacrifices vvere particularly applied vnto them For offering yerely they did not onely offer sacrifices for the new committed crimes but euen for the old for vvhich they had often sacrificed before the sacrifices being rather recordes and attestations of their sinnes then a redemption or full remission as Christes death is Vvhich being once applied to man by Baptisme vvipeth away all sinnes past God neuer remembring them any more nor euer any sacrifice or sacrament or ceremonie being made or done for them any more though for new sinnes other remedies be daily requisite Their sacrifices then could not of them selues remitte sinnes much lesse make the general redemption vvithout relation to Christes Passion And so you see it is plaine euery vvhere that the Apostle proueth not by the often repetition of the Iewish sacrifices that they vvere no sacrifices at all but that they vvere not of that absolute force or efficacie to make redemption or any remission vvithout dependance of the one vniuersal redemption by Christ his vvhole purpose being to inculâ—ate vnto them the necessitie of Christes death and the oblation of the new Testament As for the Churches holy sacrifice it is cleane of an other kinde then those of the Iewes and therfore he maketh no opposition betwixt it and Christes death or sacrifice on the Crosse in all this Epistle but rather as a sequele of that one general oblation couertly alvvaies inferreth the same as being in a different maner the very self same host and offering that vvas done vpon the Crosse and continually is vvrought by the self same Priest 4. Impossible The hostes and sacrifices of the old law vvhich the carnal Iewes made all the count of vvithout relation to Christes death vvere not onely not perfect and absolute sufficient in them selues but they did not nor could not remit any sinnes at all being but onely signes therof reserring the offenders for remission in deede to Christes Passion I or the bloud of bruit beastes could haue no other effect nor any other element or creature before Christes death the fruite vvhereof before it vvas extant could be no othervvise properly applied vnto them but by beleefe in him 5. Host and oblation He meaneth not that God vvould no host nor sacrifice any more as the Protestants falsely imagin for that vvere to take away not onely the sacrifice of Christes body vpon the altar but the sacrifice of the same body vpon the Crosse also Therfore the Prophet speaketh onely of the legal and carnal sacrifices of the Iewes signifying that they did neuer of them selues please God but in respect of Christ by vvhose oblation of his owne body they should please 5. But a body If Christ had not had a body he could not haue had any vvorthy matter or any matter at all to sacrifice in visible maner other then the hostes of the old law Neither could he either haue made the general redemption by his one oblation vpon the Crosse nor the daily sacrifice of the Church for both vvhich his body vvas fitted by the diuine vvisedom Which is an high conclusion not vnderstood of Ievves Pagans nor the Heretikes of our time that Christes humane nature vvas taken to make the Sonne of God vvho in his diuine nature could not be either Priest or host fitte to be the sacrifice and Priest of his father in a more vvorthy sort then all the Priests or oblations of the old law And that this body vvas giuen him not onely to be the sacrifice vpon the Crosse but also vpon the altar S. Augustine affirmeth in these vvordes The table vvhich the Priest of the nevv Testament doth exhibit is of his body and bloud for that it the sacrifice vvhich succeded al these sacrifices that vvere offered in shadovv of that to come For the vvhich also vve acknovvledge that voice of the same Mediatour in the psalme BVT A BODY THOV HAST FITTED TO ME because in steede of all those sacrifices and oblations his body is offered and is ministred to the partakers or receiuers Li. 17 Ciuit. Dei c. 20. And againe li. 4 de Trin. c. 14. Who so iust and holy a Priest as the onely sonne of God What might so conueniently be offered for men of men as mans flesh and vvhat so fitte for this immolation or offering as mortal flesh vvhat so cleane for cleansing the vices of mortal men as she flesh borne of the virgins vvombe and vvhat can be offered and receiued so gratefully as the flesh of our sacrifice made the body of our Priest 8. Neither did they please thee By that he saith the things offered in the Lavv did not please God and likevvise by that he saith the former to be taken avvay that the second may haue
ofteÌ„ namely in the sacrifice of the altar The sacrifice of the altar that on the Crosse both one The fathers call it the vnblouddy sacrifice of the altar Comment in 9 Hebr. Caluins contâ—Ì„pt of the fathers Leu. 16 14. Ps 39 7. c For sinne is the proper name of a certaine sacrifice called in Hebrue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as â—olocaust is an other kinde See the Annot. 2. Cor. 5. v. 2â— Ps 109. Cor. 15 25. Hier. 31 33 34. Heb. 8 8. ⸬ This is partly fulfilled in by the grace of the new testament but it shal be perfectly accomplished in heauen c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c To dedicat is to be authour beginner of a thing The Protestants traÌ„slate he hath prepared for their heresie that Christ vvas not the first maÌ„ that entered into heauen Heb. 6 4 Deu. 19. 15. Mat. 18 16. to 8 17. ⸬ Heresie and Apostasie from the Catholike faith punishable by death Deu. 32 35. Rom. 12 19. Ps 134 14. The Epistle for many Martyrs c Good vvorkes make great coÌ„fidence of saluation haue great revvard Abaâ— 2 3. Ro. â—1 17. Gal. 3 12. The old sacrifices obscurely shadovved but the sacrifice of the altar most plainely reprosenteth the sacrifice on the Crosse The Ievves sacrifices vvere not absolute IndependeÌ„t because they vvere often repeated The Apostle proueth by the often repeating of the Ievves sacrifices not that they vvere none but that they vvere not absolute sufficient The old sacrifices remitted not sinnes but vvere only signes therof God refuseth the Iewes sacrifices not al sacrifice That Christ should haue a body vvas necessarie for his Priesthod and sacrifice The body of Christ is the sacrifice of the alter Ps 39. The Ievves sacrifices refused not al sacrifice We must often note that the Apostles speache of many Priests and often sacrificing concerneth only the Iewes Priests and sacrifices not the Priests and sacrifice of the new Testament The Caluinists arguments against Christs body often offered and in many places ansvvered by the fathers long a goe in 10 cap. Hebr. ibidem The general redemption vpon the Crosse is particularly applied in the sacrifice of the altar Primas leâ—â— citate * ho. 17 in ep ad Heb. Councels and fathers When the Apostle seemeth to say there is no remission or oblation for sinne he alvvaies meaneth that ful remission by Baptisme The Caluinists heresie against remission of sinnes Al sinnes may be remitted by penaÌ„ce but not so fully as by Baptisme Perilous reading of the Scriptures 2 Pet. 3. Contempt of Christs bloud in the SacrameÌ„t Luc. 22. Penance Mercie to the emprisoned for religion Losse of goods for religion Faith is the coÌ„fort of the afflicted ⸬ By this vvord substaÌ„ce is meant that faith is the ground of our hope c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 1 13 Gen. 4 4 Mat. 23 35. ⸬ Here it appeareth that Henoch yet liueth and is not dead against the Caluinists See the annot Apocal. chap. 11. Gen. 5 24. Eccl. 44 16. ⸬ Vve must beleeue that God vvill reward all our good workes for he is a rewarder of true iustice not an accepter or imputer of that that is not Gen. 6 13. Eccl. 44 17. Gen. 12 4. 13 1. Gen. 17 19. 18 10. 21 2. Eccl. 44 22. Gen. 22 9. Gen. 21 12. Rom. 9 7. c That is in figure and mysteriâ— of Christ dead aliue againe Gen. 27 27 36. Gen. 48 15. Gen. 47 31. Gen. 50 24 25. ⸬ The translation of Relikes or Saincts bodies the due regard and honour vve ought to haue to the same are proued hereby Exo. 2 2. Exo. 1 16. Exo. 2 11 ⸬ The Protestants that deny vve may or ought to doe good in respect or for revvard in heauen are hereby coÌ„futed Exo. 12 37. Gen. 14 22. Ios 6 10 Ios 6 23 25. 2 3. The Epistle for many Martyrs Not only or a special faith Faith is of things not seen as in the B. Sacrament Nothing profitable or meritorious with out faith The citatioÌ„s the nevv Testament not only according to the Hebrue but to the SeptuagiÌ„ta Gen. 47. v. 31. * Aug. de ciu Dei li. â—5 c. 14. The vulgar latin translation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rod. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bed Adoration of creatures and namely of holy things * Ios 7 6. * Oceum in collect * 3 Reg. 11 12. Corrupt translation against Dulia Not faith onely Iaâ— 2. Li. 4 Stro. pag. 240. No vvorkes of the Patriarkes or any other profitable but by their faith in Christ Which is alvvaies the Apostles meaning in coÌ„mending faith The Patriarkes and other iust not in heauen before Christ Col. 3. 8. 1 Pet. 2 1. Prou. 3 11. Apoc. 3 19. Rom. 12 18. ⸬ That vve be not good there is no lacke on Gods part vvho offereth his grace to vs but the defect is in our selues that are not ansvverable to Gods calling of vs and grace tovvards vs. c Such as forsake their saluation and religion to saue their lands and goods are like Esau Gen. 25 33. Gen. 27 38. Exo. 19. 20. ` â—kindled or burning Exo. 19 12. ⸬ The faithful are made fellovves of Angels of al the perfect soules departed since the beginning of the vvorld and of Christ him self c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 4 10. Ag. 2 7. c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deu. 4 24. Temporal punishment after remissioÌ„ of sinnes either here or in â—urgatorie c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 12. 10. 1 Pet. 4. Gen. 18 3. 19 2. 3. Deu. 31. Ios 1. Psal 55 12. 117 6. The epistle for a Confessor that is a Bishop ⸬ Nevv diuers changeable strange doctrines to be auoided for such be hereticall Against vvhich the best remedie or preseruatiue is alvvaies to looke backe to our first Apostles the holy fathers doctrine Leu. 16 27. Ose 14 3. c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is make you perfect and absolute in al goodnes c aptet vos Hospitalitie Angels harboâ—red Hovv mariage is honorable in al if the Apostle did so say as he doth not * 1 Cor. 7. v. 38. One short place manifoldly corrupted by the Protestants They restraiÌ„e the sense to their Heretical fansie 1 Pet. 3. 1 Thes 〈◊〉 * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * The Eng. Bib. 1577. * Oâ—cum in Collect. * Beza in no. Test Groecolat an 1565. Vve must haue regard to the faith doctrine of the fathers Memories and feastes of SaiÌ„cts Iudaical abstinence from meates Material altars for the sacrifice of christs body 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Sacrifice of the altar is the principal host of praise and thankes giuing therfore called Eucharistia The Protestants auoid the vvord merite 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Good vvorkes meritorious The Apostle doth inculcate obedience to the Priests and Bishops of Gods Church No person exempted from this obedieÌ„ce in matters of religion