make any such ditch or trench Tostat. qu. 34. 2. Who therefore thinketh right that these gates were onely the places of entrance into the great streets which went thorow the camp for the host lay in such order as that they had wayes and streets betweene their tents as wee see now in cities and townes as Iosephus also describeth the situation and disposing of the camp 3. Now Moses stood in the gate or entrance not because the use was to give sentence and judgement in the gates Lyran. Borrh. Or because Moses would have the Levites to give the onset in the beginning of a street and so to go thorow as Tostat. ibid. But this was the reason Moses tabernacle or tent was without the camp and so upon that occasion Moses stood in the entrance of the camp going now to his owne tent Iun. QUEST LXVIII Whether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie Vers. 26. ANd all the sonnes of Levi. R. Salom. to whom consenteth Tostatus thinketh Quod nullus de Levitis aliquid peccaverit That none of the Levites sinned in this great transgression because it is said All the sonnes of Levi gathered themselves unto him and if the Levites had sinned â—s other tribes there had beene no more cause to advance them to the Priesthood than other tribes Contra. 1. If that generall particle all bee pressed then it would follow that the children and all came which could not be for they were not able to use swords the meaning then is not that all the Levites came but all which came were Levites Iun. Sa. Or all is taken for many as this speech is usually restrained in Scripture as all nations are said to have come and bought corne in Egypt Gen. 41. 2. The Levites were more of Gods favour and grace than of their desert separated and selected for the Priesthood yet it is evident that this tribe was freer from consenting to this idolatrie than other tribes and for this their courage and readinesse in Gods service they received a blessing 2. Some thinke that even these Levites which armed themselves against their brethren were not altogether immunes à reatu free from this sinne but while they did it for feare levius peccarunt their sin was the lesse and so the mercie of the Lord appeared so much the more not only in pardoning their sin sed gloriam suam eorum manu asserere dignatus est but he vouchsafed by their hand to maintaine his glory Calvin Simler But it is not like that God would use their ministerie in the punishing of others which were guiltie of the same punishment themselves and their owne conscience accusing them they would have had no such courage to revenge the Lords cause upon their brethren it had beene also verie offensive to the guiltie parties to be punished by them which had beene alike guiltie And Moses proclaiming who pertaineth to the Lord let him come to me did meane that they only should come who had beene faithfull unto God and had not consented to that sinne 3. Some Hebrewes doe help the matter thus that because they cannot avoid it but that some of the kindred of the Levites were guiltie of this transgression because they did not spare their owne sonnes vers 29. that because it was lawfull for any of the other tribes to take unto them the wives of Levites their husbands being dead those children which they had by them might be said to be the sons of Levi that is grand children on their mothers side But this shift is taken away because Deut. 33.9 it is said that the Levites knew not their owne father or mother or children therefore they must needs bee understood to be Levites not by marriage or in some removed degree of kindred unto them but the immediate fathers and sonnes of Levites 4. Therefore the best opinion is that all of the tribe of Levi were not free from this sin of idolatrie many of them kept themselves as it is like at home and consented not but that a great sort even of Levi offended it may thus appeare 1. Because both Aaron himselfe was a ring-leader who can by no meanes be excused from this sin Lyranus 2. It could not be avoided but that many of the Levites were drawne away by Aarons example Iun. 3. But yet it is more evident because they consecrated their hands upon their owne sonnes and brethren yea their fathers and mothers that divers of the tribe of Levi fell away with the rest Lyran. Iun. Tostatus here answereth that the name of brethren is taken largely Pro fratribus qui sunt de filiis Israel For their brethren which were of the children of Israel qu. 35. Contra. 1. If it be allowed that the name of brethren is sometime so taken what saith he to the other names of father mother sonne These must be taken for the names of kindred or else we shall never have any certaintie in Scripture when we should by these names understand naturall fathers mothers and children 2. The other words companion and neighbour shew that the first is a name of kindred the first word ach signifieth here a brother in affinitie the second râ—ah a companion and friend the third karob Vicinia ratione conjunctum him that was a neighbour in dwelling and vicinitie or neernesse of place Simlerus 5. It is evident then that some of the Levites were accessarie to this great impietie because they were punished among the rest So that R. Salomon is herein greatly deceived who thinketh that the Levites though they were blame-worthy in not resisting the idolaters yet were not idolaters themselves neither consensu mentis nec facto exteriori in consent of minde nor in any outward fact c. for the Levites had beene unjustly punished if they had beene innocent Nay R. Moses Egyptius goeth further saying that although the Israelites often are found to have committed idolatrie yet Levita nunquam idolatraverunt the Levites never committed idolatrie But the contrarie is evident by Aarons fall for hee apparantly was an idolater in his externall act in building an altar unto the golden Calfe and offering sacrifice before it Paulus Burgensis in his reply proceedeth yet further that when our blessed Saviour was put to death the Levites as they are distinguished from the Priests were not principeâ— in crimine illo pâ—ssimo principall agents in that wicked crime whereas it is evident that the Priests were the chiefe enemies that Christ had the Levites indeed are not named but seeing the high Priest with the other Priests which were of the tribe of Levi were the contrivers of Christs death then cannot that whole tribe be exempted from this villanous act which is the intendment of Burgensis a great favourer of that nation QUEST LXIX Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them Vers. 27. THus saith the Lord c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that it is not
an 130. three of an 140. and two of an 150. yeares And in these dayes some are found farre to exceed an hundred yeares as I have seene my selfe an old man of 124 yeares of age at Eversden in the County of Bedford who died about ann 1600. or 601. he could remember Bosworth field at the comming in of Henry the 7. being then as he affirmed some 15. yeares old 2. Neither is it to be thought that the yeares of the Patriarkes were accounted as the Arcadians reckoned their yeares by quarters or the Aegyptians by moneths as some have thought for then Henoch begetting children at 65. yeares should by this reckoning not exceed six yeares and a halfe when hee had a child And this Aegyptian yeare consisting of the age of the moone will not allow above two dayes and a halfe to a moneth whereas mention is made of the 17. and 27. day of the moneth Gen. 7.11 and 8.14 It is evident then that the yeares of the Patriarkes were numbred by complete and full yeares consisting of twelve moneths and not after the Aegyptian account And hereunto Pliny giveth testimony who remembreth in the same place before recited that Alexander Cornelius Xenophon doe write that some lived 500. some 600. some 800. yeares Iosephus also alleageth Manethan Berosus Mochus Estiaâ—s the Aegyptian Chalde Phenician Chronologers who testifie that those old fathers lived toward a thousand yeares QVEST. VI. The causes of the long life of men before the floud THe causes of the long life of the Patriarkes may be thought to be these foure 1. The naturall cause the sound constitution of their bodies not yet decayed and the wholesome aire not yet corrupted with terrene exhalations as after the floud 2. The morall cause for the invention and finding out of arts and sciences which as Iosephus writeth they caused to bee graven in two great pillars one of bricke another of stone that if the world were destroyed with water the second pillar might remaine if with fire the first for so had they learned of Adam that the world should be twice destroyed and he saith further that the pillar of stone was to be seene in Syria in his time 3. The civill or politke cause of the long life of the Patriarkes was for procreation and peopling of the world 4. The Theologicall that God by giving them such long life might make triall of their obedience to see if they would use this benefit of long life to the glory of God which they did not and therefore he shortned the age of man Yet the Lord while they enjoyed this long tearme would not suffer any of them to attaine unto a thousand yeares not for that as the Hebrewes suppose God granted of Adams thousand seventy yeares to David not for that reason which seemeth to be too curious whereof Ireneus maketh mention to make good that saying to Adam in what day soever thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death because a thousand yeares with God is as yesterday Psal. 90.3 And so Adam died in the first day before he came to a thousand But God hereby would put the fathers in minde of mortality that although they lived many hundred yeares yet none of them filled up a thousand lest they might have too much flattered themselves in long life and seeing a thousand is a number of perfection God would have none of them attaine to 1000. that we might know that nothing is perfect here Mercer QVEST. V. Of the false computation of the 70. Interpreters and whence it is thought to proceed FUrther whereas the Septuagint doe much differ in the account of yeares from the Hebrew text adding to the age of the old world which in true reckoning maketh but 1656. five hundred eighty six yeares more so making the whole number of yeares 2242. It is diversly conjectured how this error should arise 1. Some impute it to the malice of the Jewes that of purpose corrupted the greeke text that the Gentiles should not know the secrets of the Scriptures 2. Some to the prudency of the 70. translators or of the writers and scribes who knowing that the Aegyptians would count it but a fable that the fathers lived so many Astronomicall yeares made a way for them to take it after the count of the Aegyptian yeares whereof ten make but one yeare and therefore they added an hundred yeares to the fathers age before they begat children to make them apt for generation But where the yeares will serve without any such addition they adde none As Iered lived an 162. yeares which because it maketh by the Aegyptian calculation sixteene yeares and some what more the Septuagint there alter nothing This is Augustines conjecture But howsoever the Septuagint came to be so corrupt it is apparantly in many points erroneous 1. They adde unto six of the Patriarkes ages before they begat children to each of them Adam Seth Enâ—s Cainon Malaleel Henoch an 100. yeares and detract them againe in the remainder of their life that the whole summe may agree 2. They take away from Methusalems age before hee had children 22. yeares and adde to Lamechs age 6. yeares as is shewed before 3. They misse in their calculation in Methusalems yeares they make him to live an hundred sixty five before hee begat Lamech and 802. after in all 969. whereas the other numbers put together want two of this summe making but 967. 4. They detract from Lamechs age 24. yeares his whole age according to the Hebrew is 777 according to the septuagint but 753. 5. By their computation Methusalem must live 14. yeares after the floud for they make him to live 802. yeares after Lamech was borne and Lamech lived 188. yeares before Noah was borne and in the six hundred yeare of Noahs age came the floud Lamech and Noah make but 788. yeares after the computation of the Septuagint there remaineth yet 14. yeares of Methusalems life who according to the Hebrew computation died the same yeare in the beginning before the floud came for in the arke hee could not be where only were eight persons Noah and his wife his three sonnes and their wives Genes 7.7 and S. Peter witnesseth that in the arke eight soules only were saved 1 Pet 3.20 and to say that Methuselah was saved in the terrestriall Paradise with his father Henoch is a fabulous fiction without ground Mercerus QVEST. VI. The reason of the inequality of generation in the fathers WHereas the Patriarkes at divers ages began to beget children Mahalaleel and Henoch at 56. yeares Iered at a hundred sixty two yeares Lamech at two hundreth eighty two Noah at five hundred 1. Neither is it to be imputed to Noahs holinesse that so long abstained from mariage seeâ—ng Henoch that for his godly life was translated had children at 65. yeares 2. Neither as Pererius conjectureth is it like that Noah had other elder sonnes which were dead before the floud came for whereas it is
it as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
Pauls rare using of allegories ought to teach such that they also should be verie sparing 2. Unlesse they could say of themselves as Paul did I think I have the spirit of God 1 Cor. 7.4 They cannot challenge the like liberty in expounding of scripture as S. Paul did therefore it may be said unto them as Christ said to his disciples you know not what spirit you are of Luk. 9.55 3. Perer. to this purpose useth a good reason It only belongeth to God which inspired the Scriptures perfectly to know all things that were to come and not only to know them but to dispose direct them as it pleaseth him wherefore he only can appoint that things formerly done veram totamque figuram gerant c. should beare a true and certaine type and figure of things afterward to bee done Man therefore that cannot dispose of things to come is not to make types and figures according to his owne device 5. Confut. Types are said to be that is to signifie the things whereof they are types ANd Saint Paul saith these are 2. testaments that is Sarah and Hagar signifie two testaments Galath 4.24 so the rocke is said to be Christ that is prefigured Christ 1 Cor. 10.3 This Pererius acknowledgeth and yet could not see that Christ c. after the same manner said This is my body that is a figure of my body as both Tertullian and Augustine expound although there is great difference I grant betweene the figure and representation in types and in sacraments for there is only a signification of spirituall things but in the Sacraments there is a lively and effectuall oblation of the things signified and shadowed forth yet in the phrase and manner of speaking in both there is no difference Beza 6. Places of morall observation 1. Moral Mothers should nurse their owne children Vers. 7. THat Sarah should have given sucke c. Ambrose well noteth hereupon that by Sarahs example mothers should learne to nurse their owne children they which of necessity for want of milke or weaknesse doe put forth their children to nurse are excused but of nicenesse to refuse this duty is worthy of blame The Prophet saying thou hast given mee hope at my mothers breasts Psal. 22.9 and the Apostle commending widowes that had nourished their children 1 Timoth. 5.10 sheweth that God hath laid this duty upon mothers which they that refuse are but halfe mothers which nourish the infant in their wombes but forsake it when it commeth into the world 2. the infants many times drawing the milke of bad women doe imitate their evill manners as we see in plants and young cattell that follow the nature of the ground that feedeth them and the dammes that suckle them 3. The purpose of nature is made frustrate when for this end God hath provided milke for the food of infants for God hath made nothing in vaine Calvin 4. By this meanes also the mothers affection is alienated from the childe whom shee cannot so well fancy as whom shee hath nursed and kissed at her breasts Perer. 2. Moral Our affections must be subject to Gods will Vers. 11. THis was very grievous to Abraham yet Abraham though his affection stood otherwise after the Lord had spoken unto him doth bridle his naturall affection and submitteth it to Gods pleasure Wee likewise must learne to confirme our desires to the Lords will And if commendable and naturall love such as Abrahams was must be overswayed by our duty toward God how much more unnaturall and unlawfull lust ought to be extinguished which are flat opposite and contrary to the will of God Calvin a man is to forsake and deny himselfe for Christ. Mark. 8.35 3. Moral The counsell of inferiours not to be despised Vers. 12. IN all that Sarah shall say unto thee heare her voice Abraham is bidden to give eare to the counsel of Sarah And we must learne not to despise the advice of inferiours when they speake the truth unto us and perswade us to that which is right as the Apostle saith set up them which are least esteemed in the Church 1 Corinth 6.4 Muscul. 4. Moral The truest love leaveth not a friend no not in the instant of death Vers. 16. I Will not see the death of the child Hagars heart would not serve her to see her child dye but this was but a compassionate and effeminate love give me such a friend and lover as will not forsake one in the greatest extremity and will stand by him in the agony of death when hee hath most need of comfort I condemne not the first if it proceed of tendernesse of affection rather than of nicenesse and want of duty but I preferre the other So the Lord said to Iacob moving him to goe downe into Aegypt Ioseph shall put his hand upon thine eyes Genes 4.6 4. This duty is the dearest and nearest all other performed to their friends to close their eyes when they were dead 5. Moral God heareth our prayers every where Vers. 17. GOd heard the voyce of the child c. God is every where ready to heare the complaints of the poore Ismael was heard in the wildernesse Daniel in the Lions denne the three children in the fiery furnace Ionas in the whales belly Therefore Saint Paul saith I will that men every where lift up pure hands c. 1 Timoth. 2.8 no place is then barred to our prayers Muscul. 6. Moral Old rancour must be left where true reconciliation is made Vers. 25. ANd Abraham rebuked Abimelech c. Abraham did well being now to make a firme and faithfull league with Abimelech to powre forth all the griefe of his heart at once not as the fashion of some is which make semblance sometimes of reconciliation and attonement and yet doe retaine rancour and seeds of malice in their heart as Ioab did that embraced Abner with one hand and strooke him to the heart with the other 7. Moral Inferiour officers often abuse the name and authority of their Lords and masters Vers. 26. I Know not who hath done this thing c. also thou toldest mee not c. Abraham is found to bee here in some fault that finding himselfe grieved and wronged by Abimelechs servants would complaine of it before the King but powreth it out upon this occasion Luther so many that hold themselves quiet a long time sometime in their heat will utter their stomack But the greatest fault of all was in Abimelechs servants who abusing their masters name authority do without his knowledge take away a well from Abraham Such is the officious disposition of many inferiour officers and Ministers under Princes and other great men that they will father their injurious dealings upon their authority that neither knew nor consented So Gehezi abused his Master Elisha 2 King 5.22 CHAP. XXII 1. The Method THis Chapter entreateth first of Abrahams purpose to sacrifice Isaack his sonne with other things adjoyning vers 1. to 20. secondly of
we will finde grace with him CHAP. XXIII 1. The Argument and Contents THis Chapter treateth 1. Of the death of Sarah and Abrahams mourning for her vers 1 2. 2. Of Abrahams care for her buriall both of the communication had with the Hittites and of the purchase of the ground at the hands of Ephron vers 12. to 18. Lastly of the funerall it selfe vers 19. 2. The divers readings v. 1. In Ciriah Arbe C.B.G.P. the City Arbee H.S.T. Arbee which is in the vally S. the others have not this clause v. 3. Rose from the office of the funerall ab officio funeris H. from the dead S. from the fight of the dead or corps caeter v. 4. To bury my dead H. to bury my dead from me S. out of my fight or face caeter v. 5. Not so my Lord. S. the rest have it not v. 9. Cave of Machpelah G.B.T.P. double cave caet but it seemeth rather to be the proper name of a place vers 17.19 v. 10. Ephron dwelled H.G. stood in the middest C. sate in the middest caeter jashab signifieth both to dwell and sit he sate at this time in the middest among them v. 13. Because you are with me heare me S. I pray you heare me H. If you will shew me mercy Ch. B.G. if you be that man Tr. 1. If you be the ruler and Lord of the ground If you will give it B.G. heb if then without any other words v. 15. I have heard S. heare me caet v. 16. Which is received for merchandise in every Province G. which is currant among merchants B.G.S.H. which passeth among merchants Tr. 1. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of the yeares of Sarahs life why noted Vers. 1. ANd Sarah lived an hundred twenty seven yeares c. 1. The Hebrewes note that the death of Sarah is immediately joyned to the birth of Rebecca according to that saying in Ecclesiastes The Sunne riseth and the Sunne setteth Mercer 2. She is the only woman whose whole age is recorded in Scripture 3. Because the words are she lived an hundred years twenty yeares and seven yeares some Hebrewes note by the dividing of the yeares that she was at an hundred yeares as faire as at twenty and as chaste as at seven But this is too curious seeing that the like phrase is used in setting downe Ismaels years Gen. 25.17 in whom the like constancie especially in goodnesse appeared not 4. Isaack was at this time thirty seven yeare old being borne in Sarahs ninety yeare therefore the Hebrewes observe that the letters of the first word vaiihu doe make thirty seven insinuating thereby that these were the best dayes of Sarahs life after the birth of Isaack in whom she joyed 5. But it is not like that Isaack was now thirty sâ—ven yeares old and Sarah died the same time when Isaack was offered up the Devill representing the manner thereof to Sarah as the Jewes fable whereupon shee tooke a conceit and died for whereas Abraham returned from Mount Moriah to Beersheba againe and there dwelled Gen. 22.19 but now he was removed to Hebron where Sarah died there must needs some good space of time come between Isaacks offering up and Sarahs death Perer. 6. Whereas the word is put in the plurall the lives of Sarah we need neither refer it to three lives in man the vegetative sensitive intellectuall life nor to the changes alterations wich seemeth to make one life many but the word is so used according to the phrase of the Hebrew language Calv. QUEST II. The City of Arba whence so called Vers. 2. SArah died in Kiriatharba Which City Arbah which signifieth foure was so called 1. Neither of the foure giants Ahiman Sheshan Talmai Anach Num. 13.23 for these were long after Abrahams time 2. Nor yet of the foure Patriarks Adam Abraham Isaack Iacob there buried for neither can it be proved that Adam was there buried and it was so called before the other were there buried 3. Neither was it so named of the forme and fashion of the City which should consist of foure parts 4. But the Citie bare this name of Arbah the father of Anak Iosu. 14.14 and 15.13 Mercer QUEST III. Of Hebron supposed to be the City of Iohn Baptist. THe same is Hebron 1. This City was not so named of Hebron which came of one of the sonnes of Caleb mentioned 1 Chron. 2.42 for it was so called long before his time 2. It is probable that this City Hebron was the place of Iohn Baptists Nativity for this City did belong to Iudah and was a City of the Priests 1 Chron. 6.55 it was also situate in the hilly Countrey Iosua 14.12 so was the City of Iohn Baptist both a City of Iudah belonging to the Priests where Zachary his father dwelt and had the situation in the hill Countrey Luk. 1.39 3. This Hebron is said to bee in Canaan as it is taken for the name of the whole Countrey for the Canaanites were also one of the seven Nations that inhabâ—ted that Countrey to whom Hebron belonged not but to the Hittites Perer. 4. Hebron signifieth a society or conjuâ—ction for there Abraham and Sarah â—saack Rebecca Iacob Lea lay buried together as honourable couples from hence then it seemeth the name was derived Muscul. QUEST IV. Whence Abraham came to mourne for Sarah Vers. 2. ABraham came to mourne c. 1. Neither is it like that Abraham at this time dwelled in Beersheba and Sarah in Hebron and that he came thence hither to bewaile Sâ—rah for Abraham as he bewailed Sarah being dead so he would not be wanting to her in her life 2. Neither did Abraham come from burying of his father Thare as some thinke whom Pererius would have to die two yeare before but the truth is that he was dead 62. yeares before for Abraham was now 137. yeares old who was borne in the 70. yeare of Tharehs age who lived 205. yeares in all so Abraham was 75. yeares old when his father died Gen. 12.5 to that adde 62. so shall we have Abrahams age of 137. 3. Neither doth this comming of Abraham signifie onely his addressing and preparing of himselfe to mourne Mercer 4. But Abraham commeth from his owne tent into Sarahs to mourne for her for they had their tents and habitations apart as it may appeare Gen. 24.67 Iun. QUEST V. Wherefore Abraham weepeth over the corps of Sarah Vers. 2. TO mourne for Sarah and to weepe for her 1. As Abraham by his weeping shewed his affection so by his mourning voice he set forth the vertues of Sarah and bewailed his losses Perer. 2. He weepeth over the corps not to provoke himselfe to weepe by the sight thereof being of late so much lightned with joy for Isaacks deliverance as some Hebrewes thinke but according to the use which then was and after continued among the Jewes which was to weepe a certaine time at the bodies or graves of the
those which were innocent 5. They take them being sore upon their cutting and circumcising when they were rather to be pitied 6. They spare not Hemor and Sichem who offered to make them satisfaction by marrying Dinah and giving her dowry which they should set 7. Then they spoile the City not contenting themselves only with the goods but they carried away the women children captives 8. As much in them lay they brought Iacob and all his into danger to bee destroyed and overcome of the inhabitants 9. They being reproved of their father doe not acknowledge but justifie their sinne Perer. Calvin It appeareth then that Simeon and Levi diversly sinned in this cruell act whereof Iacob giveth this censure Simeon and Levi brethren in evill the instruments of cruelty are in their habitations into their secret let not my soule come in their wrath they slew a man and in their selfe-will they digged downe a wall cursed bee their wrath c. I will divide theâ— in Iacob c. 〈◊〉 49.6 7. In which 〈…〉 setteth downe their sinne then the punishment Their sinnes were these 1. That in their 〈…〉 they devised mischiefe and sought out how to be â—â—venged dealing 〈…〉 in their wrath 3. They didst of a selfe will of a 〈…〉 or good counsell 4. They enterprised this 〈◊〉 without the counsell or advice of their father 〈…〉 digged downe a wâ—ll to enter into 〈◊〉 and spoyle 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 good Their punishment is they are accursed and the fruit of 〈…〉 are divided in 〈…〉 neither had Simeon any possession by himselfe but intermingled with 〈◊〉 and Levi 〈…〉 among his brethren By this then it is evident that Iacob wholly condemnâ—◠〈…〉 and in nothing approveth it But whereas some would make this sentence of 〈…〉 and referre iâ— to the Levites and Priests of Levi and the Scribes who were most of 〈…〉 are here accursed for putting Christ to death It 〈◊〉 cleare that Iacob speaketh of an act done 〈…〉 denounceth thâ— sentence of 〈◊〉 and division against it Now it is not like that the 〈◊〉 should goe before the fault But Simeon and Levi were divided in Iacob long before Christ came into the world and was put to death by the Priests and Scribes 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Mariage not to be contracted with men of divers profession Vers. 14. WE cannot doe this thing to give our sister to an uncircumcised man c. This i◠〈◊〉 to the Apostles doctrine Be not unequally yoked with infidels for what fellowship 〈◊〉 righteousnesse with unrighteousnesse c. 2 Cor. 6.6 No league or friendship much lesse mariage is to be 〈◊〉 or enterprised with men of a divers profession Calvin 2. Doct. Gods judgements may be just when the ministers thereof are wicked Vers. 25. THey slew every male Simeon and Levi the captaines and chiefe in this savage exploit 〈◊〉 all the males that were men to the sword for the children were carried away captive this was a just reward upon the City for the sinne of Shechem although the instruments and minister◠〈…〉 did evill We see then that Gods judgements are just when notwithstanding the meanes whereby they are executed cannot be justified as the triall and affliction of Iob as it proceeded from God was good yet Satan the worker or rather minister thereof did it of malice 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Mariage not without the parents consent Vers. 4. THen said Shechem to his father Hamor give me this maid to wife Shechem would not take a wife but by the consent and leave of his father and this generally was the practice of those dayes Abraham provided a wife for his son Isaack Labaâ— gave his daughters in mariage to Iacob This condemneth then the practice of the Church of Rome where it is an ordinary thing for children to bee contracted and marry without their parents consent Muscul. 2. Confut. Against election by works Vers. 25. SImeon and Levi tooke either of them his sword Simeon and Levi two fathers of the Israelites and the one chosen out from his brethren to execute the priest-hood we see what their doings and works were they were guilty of much bloud God chose them not then for their owne vertue or worthinesse but for his owne mercy sake So saith Moses The Lord did not set his love upon you nor chuse you because c. but because the Lord loved you Deut. 7.8 So the Apostle concludeth by the example of Esau and Iacob whom the Lord had chosen and refused the other before they had done either good or evill That the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by works but by him that calleth Rom. 9.11 This maketh against the doctrine of the Church of Rome who ascribe election to the fore-sight of faith and works Rhemist Heb. 5. serm 7. 6. Places of exhortation and morall use 1. Morall That fathers should not suffer their daughters to stray from home Vers. 1. DInah went to see the daughters of the Countrey Bernard hereupon this noteth Sita 〈◊〉 spectas oâ—iose non spectaris tu curiose spectas sed curio 〈◊〉 spectaris thou beholdest idly or vainly but thou art not beheld in vaine thou art curious in seeing others and are more curiously seene thy selfe We see what followed Dinah's wanton and curious gazing upon others gave occasion to the unchaste and adulterous eye to lust after her therefore it is not good to give maidens their 〈◊〉 or to suffer them to wander from home or sightly to behave themselves which hath beene and in the occasion of much evill so the Apostle chargeth that young women should be diâ—erâ—nt chaste 〈…〉 Tit. â— â— Calvin 2. Mor. Sinne committed in the Church and among Christians the more grievous Vers. 7. HE had wrought folly in Israel c. Although no place have any privilege or exemption for sinne yet it is most heinous to perpetrate and commit wickednesse in or against the Church of God Adultery fornication uncleanesse is odious even among the Gentiles but it is most abhominable among Christians As the prophet upbraideth Ierusalem Sodome thy sister hath not done neither she and her daughters as thou and thy daughters Ezech. 16.48 3. Mor. Fornication to be recompenced by marriage Vers. 3. HIs heart clave unto her Shechem having forced Dinah doth not then hate her and cast her off a Ammon did Thamar his sister but his love is the more kindled toward her and he desireth her for his wife which example doth condemne the wicked lust of many which having intised maids unto folly seeke not to make satisfaction by marriage 4. Mor. Spirituall love should bee more forcible then carnall Vers. 19. THe young man deferred not to doe the thing c. Shechem to obtaine his love spareth no cost nor yet refuseth any labour hee accepteth of the hard condition of circumcision which teacheth that if carnall love be so forcible our spirituall love toward Christ should be much more effectuall that
revealed of God so he moved Ioseph to declare them 2. Iacob did not herein dissemble in seeming to rebuke Ioseph for the contentment of his brethren Iun. Calvin but he did indeed rebuke Ioseph as not yet perceiving the mysterie of these dreames yet presently came to himselfe and considered more deeply of them as it followeth vers 11. His father noted that saying Mercer QUEST XII How Iosephs mother being dead is said to fall downe unto him Vers. 10. SHall and thy mother and thy brethren come indeed and fall on the ground c. 1. Neither is it like that Rachel Iosephs mother was alive at this time as thinketh Oleaster Cajetaneâ— for Rachel was dead before Iacob came to Hebron and as yet while Rachel lived Benjamin was not borne of whom shee died in travaile so that then there could not be an eleven brethren beside Ioseph which are signified by the eleven starres 2. Neither was this fulfilled in Iosua who was of the tribe of Ephraim of Ioseph to whom indeed the Sunne obeyed by standing still as some Hebrewes for Iacob understandeth not the Sunne literally but figuratively of himselfe and so Ioseph also aplieth these dreames to himselfe and his brethren Genes 42.9 3. Neither yet is it so fit to understand Bilhâ— Rachels maid who was Iosephs reputed mother Ramban thinketh it improper that a concubine should be resembled to the moone 4. And it is more unfit with Rupertus to drive this storie to an allegorie that by the Sunne we should understand the Saints in heaven and by the Moone the militarie Church in earth that all bow unto Christ prefigured in Ioseph 5. Neither doth Iacob speake ironically hereby shewing the vanitie of Iosephs dreame as though his mother should be fetched out of her grave to doe him homage as Lyran. Perer. for Iacob himselfe noted these things and held the dreames not as vaine but as serious matters 6. Wherefore the name of mother is to be understood of her which was then mother of the family whether Leah or any of the other then living Mercer QUEST XIII How Iacob and Iosephs mother did obeysance to Ioseph in Egypt BUt a further question here ariseth how this was fulfilled that Iosephs father and mother reverenced Ioseph 1. For Iacob the case is plaine not that he personally worshipped Ioseph as some doe expound that place Genes 47.31 He worshipped toward the beds head for Iacob there did not worship Ioseph but praised God nor yet did Iacob then onely reverence Ioseph when he sent presents unto him as unknowne by his sons into Egypt Per. but Iacob did reverence Ioseph not in bowing or humbling himselfe unto him but in acknowledging and reverencing in him that high place to the which the Lord had called him 2. Iosephs mother is said to reverence him not only because he was of her posteritie in Benjamin honoured or in respect of the possibilitie or likelihood that even his mother if she had been in Egypt as his brethren were before Ioseph had discried himselfe might have fallen downe before him it is not unlike but that either Leah or some other that was the mother of the family went downe into Egypt with Iacob though it be not expressed because the women in that account are not numbred and so together with the rest might doe obeysance to Ioseph QUEST XIV Of Sechem where Iacobs sonnes kept their sheepe Vers. 12. THey went to keepe their fathers sheepe in Shechem 1. This was not another Shechem beside that Citie which Simeon and Levi put to the sword as some Hebrewes think for though it be a good space distant from Hebron they might raunge thither to finde out pasture for their Cattell as Laban and Iacob kept their flockes three dayes journey asunder neither need they to be afraid of the inhabitants because of the blood shed in that place seeing that Shechem was now become Iacobs possession and the feare of him fell upon the cities round about 2. This Shechem was a notorious place for divers accidents there done in this place Simeon and Levi committed that bloodie exploit there Ioseph was sold there Ieroboam divided the kingdome 1 King 13.25 in Dothan not farre from thence the Prophet Elizeus was when the king of Aram sent a great hoast to take him 2 King 6.13 3. It is evident by this place that Salem is not a proper name of a place and the same with Shechem as some doe reade Gen. 33.18 for here Iacob sendeth Ioseph to Sechem to see if they were shelem in safety or in peace QUEST XV. What man it was that did meet Ioseph being out of his way Vers. 17. THe man said they are departed hence c. 1. This was a man and not the Angel Gabriel as the Hebrewes imagine for it appeareth he was one that knew his brethren and was present when he heard them say they would goe to Dothan 2. Neither need we curiously with the Hebrewes to refer this their departure to the inward disposition of their minde that they were departed from all brotherly affection toward Ioseph the words are plaine enough that he meaneth their changing of place Mercer QUEST XVI Why they call Ioseph dreamer Vers. 19. BEhold this dreamer commeth The Word is Lord or master of dreames 1. They either so call him because dreames were usuall with Ioseph Mercer 2. Or for that as the property of envious men is they doe aggravate the matter beyond the truth and make it more than it is Thom. Anglic 3. Or they so called him as the author and inventor of dreames Vatab. 4. As also in respect of the matter or object of the dreames which made Ioseph Lord over his brethren Iun. QUEST XVII Of the consultation of Iosephs brethren to kill him Vers. 20. COme let us kill him c. 1. The Hebrewes imagine that they had purposed to destroy him while he was a far off by setting dogs upon him to worry him but it seemeth that this was their first consultation to kill him and to cast him into a pit Mercer 2. Their excuse was ready to say some evill beast had devoured him for that country abounded with wilde beasts as Lions 1 King 13. the man of Iudah was slaine by a lion and bears 2 King 2.42 children that railed upon the Prophet were rent asunder of them 3. Herein as Prosper well noteth the Patriarkes conspiring Iosephs death were a figure of the Iewes that took counsell to put our blessed Saviour to death 4. But although they herein sustained the person of the Iewes in figure they are not excused from sinne as Ambrose seemeth to insinuate Subierunt personam peccatoris populi ut gratiam acciperent Redemptoris certe culpam abolevi-graâ—ia c. They did beare the person of the sinfull people to receive the grace of the Redeemer certainly grace hath blotted out the fault their fault was no doubt remitted but first we must yeeld the same to have beene committed QUEST XVIII Of
high Priest as the Hebrewes imagine for he died ten yeares before Iacob was borne who was now above 100. yeare old and therefore Melchisedeck could not have a daughter so young to beare children neither was this punishment arbitrary in Iudah and inflicted without law according to his pleasure Burgens for Iudah had no such authority there nor yet as Lyranus and Tostatus was she worthy of the fire because she had committed not simple fornication but adultery because she was by law obliged to the third brother and so in a manner espoused for it was not adultery for the widow of the brother to marrie with some other than the surviving brother else Naomi would never have advised her daughters in law to get them other husbands in their owne Countrey Ruth 1.9 But I rather thinke that Thamars adultery was in this that she had played the whore whereas Iudah had betrothed and espoused her to Selah and that Iudah who never was minded to give Selah to Thamar fearing lest he might die also as is evident vers 11. was very forward to take this occasion to be rid of Thamar that Selah might not marrie her 3. But herein appeareth Iudahs too much rigour and injustice that before the matter was examined gave sentence and was partiall the truth being knowne in his owne cause and further it was a savage part to put to death a woman great with childe which is contrary both to divine and humane lawes for it is written Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not bee put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but if Thamar had now died the infant had died with her The Romans had a law that the execution of a woman with childe should be deferred till she had brought forth the same also was practised among the Athenians Aeltan lib. 5. And therefore Claudius the Emperour is noted for his cruelty that spared not to put to death women with childe Perer. ex Dion lib. 57. QUEST XI Wherefore the Midwife useth a red threed and what colour it was of Vers. 28. THe midwife bound a red threed c. 1. It is so rather to be read than with Oleaster a twine or double threed the word sani here used commeth indeed of sanah that signifieth to double which is rather to be referred to the double die and colour than the double matter Iun. Tostatus also is much deceived here that taketh it not for a red but a blacke colour twice died ex Perer. 3. The Midwife tied this red threed as a marke of the first-borne because he first put forth his hand and the purple colour very well agreeth to the birth-right or eldership Muscul. QUEST XII Whence Pharez was so called and whereof he is a type Vers. 29. HOw hast thou broken thy breach upon thee 1. Hierome is deceived that of this word pharatz that signifieth to breake or divide thinketh the Pharises to have taken denomination whereas they had their name rather of Pharas which signifieth to disperse or separate because they were separate from other in profession of life and their apparell Mercer 2. This story hath bin diversly allegorized by the fathers some by Pharez understand the beleeving Gentiles by Zarah the Israelites and by the red threed their bloudy circumcision sacrifices sic Iren. Cyril Some contrariwise will have Phares to signifie the Jewes Zarah the beleeving Gentiles Chrysost. 3. But this Phares is more fitly a type and figure of Christ who hath broken downe the partition wall and hath broken the power of hell and death Mercer And by this strange and extraordinary birth the Lord would have Iudah and Thamar admonished of the sin which they had committed and to be humbled thereby though he in his mercie had forgiven it Calvin 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The difference betweene the apparelling of widowes and wives Vers. 14. SHe put her widowes garment off c. It seemeth that it was the use in those dayes for widowes to be knowne from wives by their mourning and grave apparell in which case more is permitted to women that are married whom the Apostle alloweth to adorne themselves with comely and sober apparell without pride or excesse 1 Timoth. 2.9 to please and content their husbands but widowes having no husbands to whose liking they should apparell themselves ought not to decke themselves to please other mens eyes Luther 2. Doct. Friendship ought alwayes to be joyned with pietie Vers. 20. IVdah sent a kid by the hand of his friend This Hâ—rah Iudahs friend did performe an evill office in being as it were a broker for Iudah who should neither have requested any dishonest or uncomely thing of his friend nor the other yeelded unto it love truth and piety ought not to be separated as Saint Iohn saith Whom I love in the truth Epist. 3.1 Muscul. 3. Doct. Adultery in former times punished by death Vers. 24. LEt her bee burnt We see that even among the Canaanites adultery was judged worthy of death for Iudah inventeth no new kinde of punishment but speaketh according to the law and custome of that Countrey So the Lord himselfe said to Abimelech that had taken Sarai unto him Behold thou art but a dead man for this c. Gen. 20.3 Now although this law as peculiar to that Countrey bindeth not now neither in respect of the kinde of death for by Moses law onely the Priests daughter if she played the whore was burned Levit. 21.9 the rest were stoned nor yet in the inequality of the law for the women offending were burned the men escaped as appeareth in Iudah Calvin whereas both adulterers and adulteresses are alike guilty and though then there was greater cause of keeping their seed uncorrupt for preserving of their lives and the distinction of families in which respect it may be thought somewhat of the former rigour and severity may be abated yet this example condemneth the security and connivence of magistrates in these dayes in the punishing of this sinne when as faults of lesse nature are more severely censured than adultery And whereas the president of our Saviour is urged by some for the mitigation of the punishment of adultery because he would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie it doth not serve their turne for this mercie Christ shewed not to cleare or exempt the adulteresse leaving her to the magistrate but partly to shew that he came not to be a judge in such causes as neither in other like businesses as dividing of the inheritance Luk. 12.14 partly by this example he would teach what is to be required in the person of an accuser not to bee guilty of that crime whereof he accuseth others 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That it is not lawfull upon any occasion to marrie the brothers wife Vers. 8. GOe into thy brothers wife Because in this place as also Deut. 25.5 it is permitted to naturall brethren to marry the wives of their brother deceased
cordis quam facie corporis fairer in the light of his soule than in the face of his bodie Augustine 4. In whom appeare foure principall vertues his temperance in not being inticed no not by his Mistresse his justice in not yeelding to doe this wrong and dishonour to his Master his fortitude in not suffering himselfe by many attempts and assaults to be overcome his prudence in choosing rather at once to reject her and leave his garment than to keepe her in suspence Rupertus QUEST V. How it came to passe that Ioseph was imprisoned not put to death Vers. 20. AFter this manner did thy sâ—rvant unto me and Iosephs Master tooke him and put him in prison 1. That is an obscure colection of Rasi that Potiphars wife being in bed with her husband shewed how Ioseph would have done unto her it is not like that shee stayed so long to make her complaint but as Iosephus thinketh she sitting weeping and mourning told her tale as soone as her Lord came in 2. In that Potiphar casteth Ioseph into prison and killeh him not I neither thinke with Perer that it proceeded of his Masters love toward him nor with Musculus that hee was committed to custodie there to be kept till he received the sentence of death But I rather with Chrysostome ascribe it to Gods providence who so wrought in Pharaohs heart that hee had no such purpose to put Ioseph to death as also Iosephs innocencie might appeare for the which cause the chiefe keeper under Potiphar shewed him favour 3. It seemeth that Ioseph was put into a dungeon chap. 40.15 The word Sohar signifieth a round vaulted house such was this where the Kings prisoners lay bound and whither Ioseph was sent not of favour as some thinke but for more sure keeping and there hee lay bound with fetters as it is in the Psal. 105.18 They hold his feet in the stockes and hee was laid mirons 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The prosperitie of the righteous must bee ascribed to Gods providence Vers. 2. THe Lord was with Ioseph and he prospered Iosephs prosperitie is ascribed to Gods providence the world useth to impute such things to chance and fortune but wee must looke toward God the author of our prosperous state and moderator of our afflictions Calvin That wee may say with David Whom have I in heaven but thee and I have desired none in the earth with thee Psal. 73.25 2. Doct. Why adulterie is called a great sinne and against God Vers. 9. HOw can I doe this great wickednesse and sinne against God Adulterie is called a great sinne as Abimeleck saith to Abraham What have I offended thee that thou hast brought upon mee and my kingdome this great sinne Gene. 20.9 It is a great sinne because there is dishonor done to the husband whose bed is defiled the childeren are wronged who are illegitimate being gotten in adulterie the woman also breaketh her faith and vow made to her husband and this sinne is specially said to be against God who is the author of holy wedlocke whose institution is by this meanes violated and broken as David therefore saith Psal. 51.4 Against thee against thee onely have I sinned Muscul. 3. Doct. Feare of evill report must not make us leave our dutie Vers. 12. HE left his garment and fled Ioseph did choose rather to keepe his innocencie though it were with infamie and false report for as according to S. Pauls rule wee must not doe evill that good may come of it Rom. 3.8 So wee must not leave off to doe good though evill doe insue upon it Wee ought to use all meanes to have good report but rather than wee should hazard our faith and innocencie wee must arme our selves with Ioseph to passe by honour and dishonour by evill report and good report 2 Cor. 6.8 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against Merits Vers. 21. THe Lord was with Ioseph and shewed him mercie c. Although Ioseph feared God and was a vertuous man yet this favour which he found is ascribed to Gods mercie not to any merit or worthinesse in him for although the Lord rewardeth his innocencie and integritie by this means yet was it in mercie Calvin So Iacob before acknowledged all to be of Gods mercie Gen. 32.10 I am not worthie of the least of all thy mercies and Gene. 33.10 God hath had mercie on me and therefore I have all things 2. Confut. Against the descension of Christ into Limbus patrum Vers. 22. ANd the keeper committed all the prisoners to Iosephs hand c. Pererius here maketh Ioseph a type and figure of Christ that as the prisoners were committed to his charge whom he was a great comfort unto and prophesied unto some of their deliverance so Christ descending to hell delivered from thence those which were there bound in prison Contra. Beside that such devised allegories are but simple grounds of matters of faith such as the Papists make the descension of Christ to Limbus patrum to be this comparison betweene Ioseph and Christ hath small agreement in this point 1. Ioseph was put into the dungeon as a prisoner himselfe I hope they will not say that Christ was as a prisoner in hell 2. Ioseph delivered none but foreshewed the deliverance of some but Christ must be a deliverer 3. Some of these prisoners were not delivered but condemned but Christ they say harrowed that hell to the which hee descended and delivered all 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. Families and kingdomes blessed for the righteous sake Vers. 5. THe blessing of the Lord was upon all that hee had in the house and in the field Thus wee see that God blessed Potiphars house for Iosephs sake as Laban prospered because of Iacob thus houses families cities and kingdomes are blessed because of the people of God the world therefore hath reason to make much of them as Potiphar did of Ioseph not to hate and deâ—ide them as the fashion of this untoward age is 2. Observ. Beautie a deceitfull gift Vers. 6. IOseph was a faire person Ioseph by occasion of his beautie and favour was in great danger to have beene supplanted and inticed to evill which teacheth us that although favour and beautie bee a precious gift from God and as the Poet could say gratior est pulchro veniens è corpore virtus vertue hath a better grace that shineth from a beautifull face Yet there are better gifts to bee desired which bring no such inconvenience as the Apostle saith desire you the best gifts 1 Cor 12.31 Muscul Calvin 3. Observ. The three engines and weapons of harlots Vers. 7. HIs Masters wife cast her eyes upon Ioseph Wanton women have three principall weapons that they fight with prima adultera oculorum telâ— sunt an harlots first engines are her eies as here Iosephs Mistresse first casteth her eies upon him secunda verborum The second are her inticing words as here shee impudently saith come lie
propesieth of the division of the land of Canaan among his sonnes that came to passe 215. yeares after Perer. Iun. and therefore Iunius interpreteth the word â—chariâ—h in the times following that is afterwards 4. But Isidorus Pelusiota is much deceived who writeth lib. 1. epist. 365. that whereas Iacob intended to declare to his sonnes the mysterie of the incarnation of Christ because they were unworthy to heare it God turned his minde that he forgot what he purposed to say and told them of things past in stead of things to come to this purpose to prove the alteration and change of Iacobs judgement he wresteth that saying of Esay 40.27 why sayest thou O Iacob my way is hid from the Lord and my judgement is passed over of my God Contra. 1. The Prophet speaketh this not of the person but of the people and posteritie of Iacob 2. Iacob here doth reveale to his sonnes the mysterie of the Messiah 3. And most of Iacobs speech is propheticall of the times to come he onely in foure of them remembreth things done and past in Ruben Simeon Levi and somewhat of Ioseph ex Perer. QUEST III. Of Rubens prerogatives Vers. 2. RVben the beginning of my strength c. 1. This is the first effect of his strength Iun. whom he begot in the strength of his yeares Perer. as the Septuag expound the beginning of my sonnes 2. The Latine translator is deceived that readeth the beginning of my sorrow which some understand of the sorrow of travell in the first borne some of the Parents care when he beginneth to have children some of his fathers griefe because of his incest but this varietie of exposition ariseth of the mistaking of the word ooâ— which here signifieth strength not sorrow as it is taken Deut. 21.21 3. The excellencie of dignitie the excellencie of power some understand these words generally of Rubens dignitie Mercer The Chalde insinuateth three privileges due to the first borne the kingdome the birth-right the priesthood Hierom by dignitie understandeth his double part or gifts by power his command over his brethren but by dignitie rather he meaneth his preeminence over his brethren which is conueied to Iudah by power his double part which belonged to the eldership bestowed upon Ioseph Iun. QUEST IIII. How Ruben is said to be light like water Vers. 4. LIght at water thou shalt not be excellent 1. Some understand this lightnesse â—s water of Rubens intemperancie that his lust carried him away as water Hierom. Mercer 2. But it is better referred to the loste of his dignitie that as water runneth to the lower parts Tostat. and being powred out it leaveth nothing behind in the vessell as oile and wine doth Lyran. so he was fallen from his dignitie and birth-right Iun. 3. As the next word giveth this sense thou shalt not be excellent or increase for the tribe of Ruben did performe no excellent or worthy exploit Deborah reproveth them for their backwardnesse Iud. 5.15 and Ruben was but small in number in respect of other tribes Deuteron 33.6 Perer. QUEST V. How Ruben is said to ascend or goe up to his fathers bed and the divers expositions thereof THou diddest defile my bed c. We need not to enforce here a mysticall sense either with Ambrose to applie it to the Jewes who insulted against Christs humanitie which was as the bed of the Godhead and so defiled Gods bed or with Ruffinus that they profaned the law by the which God as it were dwelled with them by corrupting it with their glosses by preferring the carnall rites thereof before the grace of Christ or with the ordinarie glosse by Ruben to understand the Angels which waxed insolent against God and so were cast out of heaven as water or with Rupertus to expound it of heretikes who with corrupt doctrine defile the Church the habitation of God 2. And concerning the literall sense of these words 1. Neither doe we read thou hast defiled my bed by going up for gâ—ulah is not the infinitive but the preter tense Mercer 2. Neither is the meaning thy dignitie is gone for the word ieisugni hath a servile accent that joyneth it with the word following Mercer 3. Nor yet in saying my bed is gone up or ascended is the meaning that Iacob forsooke his bed and never lay with Bilha more as Kimhi or that the dignitie and honour of his bed was gone Mercer For the word gnalah is personally used before of Ruben not really of the bed 4. Therefore as before hee said in the second person Thou wentest up to thy fathers bed so here in the third person he speaketh to his sonnes in detestation of this fact He ascended or went up to my bed Iun. QUEST VI. Simeon and Levi how said to be brethren Vers. 5. SImeon and Levi brethren 1. Not so much brethren by nature as in this their evill purpose these two were thought to be the principall contrivers of Iosephs death if the rest would have consented some thinke that these two tribes put Christ to death Iudas of Simeon the Priests of Levi Mercer Though the rest of Iacobs sonnes consented to this action yet Simeon and Levi are named as chiefe 2. They are said to be cruell instruments in their compacts for so the word mechereth is better interpreted of carah to buy or bargaine than for their habitations as Mercer or swords as Hierome as before is shewed because they made a subtill agreement with the Sichemites Iun. And this seemeth to bee the meaning of the Septuagint who thus read They have finished the iniquitie of their purpose or invention 3. Their cruell and unjust enterprise herein appeareth 1. That the slaughter of the Sichemites was made against the peace and covenant concluded 2. They made a fraudulent league having no purpose to keepe it 3. They dishonoured their owne profession killing those which were contented to bee circumcised 4. And at that time when they were sore of cutting and to be pitied 5. They put not Sichem alone to the sword who had offended but all the rest of the Citie that were innocent 6. They were not content with the slaughter of men but made a spoile and havocke of the Citie Perer. QUEST VII What Iacob meaneth by his glorie Vers. 6 MY glorie bee not thou joyned with their assembly 1. Some by glorie understand good name and fame some the soule the glorie of the body Mercer But it rather here betokeneth the tongue which is the instrument of praise and glorie as it is taken Psal. 30.16 there the word translated tongue is in the originall chebodh glorie so that the meaning is that as hee gave no consent unto them in his heart so neither would he afford that action any approbation with his tongue Muscul. Iun. 2. R. Salomon expoundeth the first clause into their secret let not my soule come of Zimri his uncleane act who was of Simeon that in secret companied with Cozbi
that can save and destroy Iam 4.12 Onely God that gave unto man his life hath power to take it away and therefore otherwise than God hath given direction either by particular precept or generall rule the life of man is not to bee taken away 3. And seeing Magistrates are but Gods Ministers Rom. 13.4 they must execute justice according to his will for it is required of a disposer that he bee found faithfull 1. Cor. 4.2 but Gods will otherwise appeareth not than in his word 4. And seeing whatsoever is not of faith that is firme perswasion is sinne Rom. 14.23 and faith must be grounded upon the word as being wrought by the word Rom 10.17 how can the Magistrate approve his acts of justice as in the sight of God unlesse hee can warrant the same by the word 2. Neither yet can I consent with those which thinke that the punishment inflicted by Moses for the breach of the morall law together with the morall law is imposed upon Christian Magistrates as it is not lawfull to punish adulterie otherwise than by death nor simple theft by death but by restitution Piscator praefation in Exod. for if this were so then the Gospell should overthrow the policie and institution of divers Common-wealths which of a long time have continued but God is the author of peace not of confusion 1. Cor. 14.33 2. Mardoche and Daniel having place of government under the Persian Kings did no doubt minister justice according to the lawes of that countrey 3. Our Saviour Christ commanding to give tribute to Caesar and injoyning obedience to the higher powers which did beare the sword and that for conscience sake Rom. 13. seeme to give approbation to the lawes of nations maintaining right and tending to equity 4. Our Saviour himselfe observed not the judicials belonging to the morall law for whereas he that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath was stoned to death by Moses yet out Saviour excuseth and defendeth his Apostles who did as much as the other in rubbing the eares of corne for their necessity Matth. 12. yea hee giveth a rule that for fornication onely and adulterie it was lawfull for a man to put away his wife Matth. 19. which exception needed not if either in fact then or in right afterward adulterers and adulteresses were to bee punished by death If it be answered that Christ tooke not upon him the office of the Civill Magistrate to impose corporall punishment yet would not our Saviour have defended his Apostles nor yet by silence have left them unreproved for neglect of the law 3. Wherefore the best resolution is that the morall judicials of Moses do partly bind and partly are left free they do not hold affirmatively that we are tied to the same severity of punishment now which was inflicted then but negatively they doe hold that now the punishment of death should not be adjudged where sentence of death is not given by Moses Christian Magistrates ruling now under Christ the Prince of peace Isai. 9. that is of clemencie mercie may abate of the severitie of Moses law mitigate the punishment of death but they cannot adde unto it to make the burthen more heavie to shew more rigour than Moses becommeth not the Gospell to extend more favour is not unbeseeming of these two assertions my reasons are as followeth 1. That which Ambrose urgeth out of the mouth of Luke how our Saviour reproveth his Disciples because they would have had fire come downe upon the Samaritanes upon the which example hee thus inferreth Ostenditur nobis non semper in eos qui peecaverunt vindicandum quia nonnunquam amplius prodest clementia tibi ad patientiam lapso ad correctionem It is shewed us that alwayes vengeance is not to bee taken of those that offend because oftentimes clemencie is more profitable for patience in thee and amendement in the offender And this collection is ratified by the answer of our Saviour in that place The Sonne of man is not come to destroy mens lives but to sâ—ve them Luk. 9.55 2. Augustine urgeth the example of Christ who suffered the woman taken in adâ—â—tery to escape without punishment of death Ioh. 8. Whereupon hee inferreth that the adulter◠〈◊〉 not now to bee put to death but to live rather to be reconciled to her husband or to come 〈…〉 the usuall answer is that our Saviour doth not here abrogate the Law against adultery 〈◊〉 only to meddle with the Magistrates office Piscator Ans. Neither doe wee say that Christ abrogateth that law but leaveth it free and taketh away the necessitie of it And though Christ exercised not the Magistrates office in his owne person yet in this case it had not beene impertinent to have given direction to have her before the Magistrate as in another case he sendeth the leper to the Priest Matth. 8.4 if it had pleased him to impose still the severitie of the law yea our Saviour sheweth by his answer Let him that is amongst you without sinne cast the first stone at her Ioh. 8.7 that hee would not have them such strait executors of the rigour of Moses law upon others but rather to bee severe judges of themselves and with charitable affection to support the frailty of others to the which themselves were subject 3. Further the difference betweene the times of the Law and of the Gospell must be considered then they received the spirit of bondage to feare but now the spirit of adoption Rom. 8.15 then they which came neere the mount where the morall Law was given were stone or stricken thorow with darts whether man or beast Heb. 12.20 but it is not so now then the bloud of Abel cryed for vengeance but the bloud of Christ now calleth for mercie and so speaketh better things than that of Abel Heb. 12.24 Therefore to mitigate the severitie of Moses Law in some cases yet not leaving sinne unpunished nor by connivence cherishing the same it is more sutable to the profession of the Gospell of peace and mercie Wherefore I here say with Chrysostome Vbi paterfamilias largus est dispensator non debet esse tenax Where the master of the house is bountifull the steward must not be sparing Melius est propter misericordiam rationem reddere quà m propter crudelitatem It is better to be called to account for too much pitie than for cruelty 4. The continuall practice of the Church sheweth as much that the rigour of Moses judicials is mitigated S. Paul willeth the incestuous man only to be excommunicate 1. Cor. 5. it seemeth then there was no law in force to put such to death nor in Cyprians time who thus writeth Quidam episcopi in nostro provincia c. Some Bishops in our province have altogether shut up penance against adulterie Nor after that in the time of the Eliberin Councell which was held under the reigne of Constantine where it was decreed can 9. Moechatus
the first common and usuall as a signe of griefe and mourning as David came to Jerusalem barefoote 2. Sam. 15.30 The second civill as by putting off the shooe they signified the yeelding up of their right as it is prescribed Deut. 25.9 and practised Ruth 4.7 The third was religious which betokened the putting off of earthly carnall thoughts and the preparing of the minde for spirituall things Iun. in Analys 2. This putting off the shooes 1. some say was commanded Moses that he thereby should sanctifie that place by making bare his feete but the place was holy already because of Gods presence the place was not holy because Moses put off his shooes but because it was holy Moses is bid to put off his shooes 2. Ambrose thus applieth it that because the shooes are made of the skinnes of dead beasts Moses should put off all feare of death for feare whereof hee fled at the first time from Pharaoh 3. Cyprian would have thereby signified that Moses by putting off his shooes doth not challenge any right in the spouse of the Church but resigneth it to Christ the head and husband thereof for this was the custome that the next kinsman by putting off the shooe did surrender his right in the brothers wife deceased unto the next after him Ruth 4. 3. Because the putting on of the shooes did betoken haste as the Israelites were commanded to eat the Passeover with their shooes upon their feete therefore the putting them off betokeneth the contrarie not in haste but with due preparation Moses should approach Perer. 4. But the most likely signification is that all carnall thoughts set apart Moses should draw neere with reverence and spirituall preparation Ferus as into the house of God Eccle. 4 17. QUEST X. Why the Lord called himselfe the God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob Vers. 6. I Am the God of thy father the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob 1. By thy father he meaneth Amram shewing that he was the God of them and of their seed and of all Israel being mindfull of his promise made to their fathers Simlerus 2. Abraham Isaac and Iacob are here named not so much in regard of their sanctity and excellent vertues for Abel Enoch and Noah were holy men in their time but for these causes are they especially named 1. Because to them specially were the promises made touching the land of Canaan 2. They were the next and immediate fathers of Israel 3. To them God more fully revealed himselfe and shewed his counsell 4. And principally for that those Patriarks had most evident prophesies of the Messiah as Abraham Gen. 22.18 that all the earth should be blessed in his seed and the same promise was renewed to Isaac Gen. 26.4 Iacob also prophesieth of the comming of the Messiah under the name of Shiloh 5. These three Patriarks are named to shew the efficacie of Gods promise made unto them the time now approching when they should see the accomplishment thereof Perer. 3. The name of God is thrice repeated and set before Abraham Isaac and Iacob both to expresse the mysterie of the Trinitie and to shew the speciall and particular care that God had of each of them being a gratious God unto them all and because unto them all were the promises made the certainty whereof by this repetition is insinuated Pererius QUEST XI Why Moses hid his face Vers. 6. THen Moses hid his face 1. For these causes wee find in Scripture that men have used to hide them for feare as Adam hid himselfe in Paradise for shamefastnesse as Rebeckah covered her selfe with the vaile when she saw Isaac Gen. 24. for reverence and humility as Elias covered his face when the Lord spake unto him 1. King 19. for weaknesse and impotencie as Moses face was covered from the Israelites because they were not able to behold the glory of his countenance Exod. 34. Perer. 2. For two of these causes Moses here covereth his face first as being guilty of his owne infirmity and weaknesse as being not able to behold the exceeding great glory of God as also of reverence Piscator 3. Moses is not mentioned here in direct words to have prayed or worshipped as wee read of others the servants of God when the Lord appeared unto them not that Moses either being astonished forgat it or disabled himselfe as not worthy but he inwardly in his soule adored the divine Majesty as the humility of his externall behaviour sheweth Simler QUEST XII How this text is alleaged by our Saviour in the Gospell to prove the resurrection of the dead NOw whereas our Saviour Christ Matth. 22. Mark 12. and Luk 20. alleageth this divine testimony I am the God of Abraham c. and inferreth thereupon he is the God of the living and not of the dead and so convinceth the Sadduces that held there was no resurrection the question is seeing that this scripture proveth onely the immortality of the soule which some of the Philosophers held and yet beleeved not the resurrection how this place was applied by our Saviour to prove the resurrection of the body First then it may bee answered that seeing Abraham Isaac and Iacob being departed out of this world are said to bee living unto God and these names were given unto them as consisting of soule and body this place sheweth that both their soules doe live actually with God and their bodies also in hope not being dead but onely asleepe Ireneus lib. 4. cap. 11. so also Chrysostome in 22. cap. Mat. 2. Some answer that by necessarie consequent the mortality of the soule being granted the resurrection of the body must follow because the soule naturally hath a desire to the body and cannot have true and full happinesse untill the bodie which was partaker of the labours and travels of this life with the soule bee made fellow also with it in joy which reason moved some of the Philosophers as the Pythagoreans and Platonists which held the soule to be immortall to dreame of the remigration and returne of the soule to the body thinking it impossible that the soule should for ever bee separated from the body sic Thomas lib. 4. contra Gent cap. 79. 3. But the best solution of all is Hieromes that against the Sadduces who denied the resurrection of the body onely for that they beleeved not the immortality of the soule it was a strong argument to convince them of error in denying the resurrection to take away the ground of their error in proving by this text the living and being of the soule this also is the solution of Cajetane QUEST XIII Why our Saviour specially urgeth this place against the Saduces FUrther though out of the old Testament divers other places might be alleaged more pregnant at the first sight than this to prove the resurrection of the dead as Hierome doth specially note that place Iob. 19. I know my redeemer liveth yet our Saviour
are in his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1
shall bee a cloud and smoke by day and the shining of flaming fire by night c. and a covering shall be for a shadow in the day for the heate c. Isai. 4.5.6 QUEST XX. How this cloud differed from other clouds THis piller of the cloud was much differing from all other cloudes 1. In respect of the substance it was cleere and lightsome not darke and thicke as other cloudes are 2. It was in figure and shape as a piller the nether part thereof descending unto the Tabernacle the upper part reaching aloft unto heaven whereas other cloudes descend not as low as the earth 3. It alwayes kept this figure and fashion of a piller whereas other cloudes doe alter and vary in shape and appearance 4. This cloud moved of it selfe whereas other cloudes are moved by the wind and of themselves have no motion this way or that way but only as they ascend and goe up in vapors but this cloud both ascended and descended 5. Other cloudes are made of naturall causes as of vapors and exhalations but this cloud was raised by the Lord beside the ordinarie course of nature 6. The effects were divers for other cloudes are apt to engender raine and drop downe moisture but this was not ordained for that end but to shew them the way in going before them 7. This cloud differed in motion from all other cloudes for they are carried all one way with the wind this sometime went forward when the camp removed sometime it came backe and stood upon the Tabernacle it went sometime to the right hand sometime to the left according as the journies of the people were appointed out 8. The motion of it was alwayes certaine it went before the campe as they were able to endure to follow whereas other cloudes are carried swiftly that they cannot bee followed 9. The situation of it was divers not carried aloft as other cloudes which can be no direction to leade a man in his journey but this cloud was of such equall distance as it did part out their way before them like as the starre that guided the Wise men appeared below in the aire to conduct them Matth. 2.10 Lastly whereas other cloudes are not durable but are soone dissipated and dissolved by the wind and weather this cloud remained firme and so continued for the space of 40. yeeres Ex Perer. QUEST XXI· When the cloud began first to appeare BUt concerning the time of the first and last appearing of this cloud it is not like as Hierome thinketh that it went not before them till they came unto the third station in Etham because mention is first made of it there 1. For they had need as well before of a guide to direct them the way as afterward and therefore it is like that they had this direction in their first setting forth out of Egypt 2. As it is in the Psalm He made his people to goe out like sheepe and led them in the wildernesse like a flocke Psal. 78.52 where the Prophet alludeth unto the fashion of those countries where the shepheard goeth before and the sheepe follow after as our Saviour saith in the parable Ioh. 10.27 So the Lord went before his people as a shepheard in the cloudy and fierie piller even when he brought them out of Egypt 3. The Prophet Esâ—y also alluding unto this cloud saith That upon every place of mount Sion and the assemblies thereof shall be a cloud Esay 4.5 So that hence it may be gathered that the Israelites in every place and in all their assemblies and campes had the presence of this cloud 4. Then like as the Wise men saw the starre that brought them to Christ in the beginning of their journey as they say Wee have seene his starre in the East and are come to worship him Matth. 2.2 they first saw the starre and then came forth so it may bee thought that the Israelites saw this cloud in their first setting forth 5. The people had need to have had all encouragement in their first going forth and to be animated in their journey and therefore it is like that the Lord did at the very first shew these comfortable signes of his presence QUEST XXII When the cloud and fiery piller ceased ANd as the cloud appeared not so late as Hierome supposeth so neither was it taken out of their sighâ— so soone as the Hebrewes imagine for they say that after Aarons death who died on the first day of the first moneth in the 40. yeere after their departure out of Egypt Numb 33.38 the piller of the cloud and of the fire were no more seene and their reason is because that after that time no more mention is made of them Contra. First this is no sufficient reason for neither is there mention made of them a good while before 2. The words of the text are against their opinion for it is said That the Lord tooke not away the piller of the cloud by day nor the piller of fire by night from before the people Vers. 22. So then as long as they had need of this direction the Lord failed them not 3. Seeing the use of these pillers was to leade them the way that they might goe by day and by night it is like so long as they were in the way and travelled in the wildernesse they had the presence of the cloud the same cause remaining the meanes are like to have beene still continued But from the mount Hor where Aaron died untill they came to the plaine of Moab in the borders of the land of Canaan there were many solitary desert and waste places thorow the which they passed for divers of their stations were yet behind as appeareth Numb 33. that they had after they came from Mount Hor eight severall stations therefore it may well bee gathered that as they had the direction of the cloud in their other stations so also in these Perer. 4. Then like as the starre left not the Wise men till it had brought them to the very house where the holy 〈◊〉 was Matth. 2. So we may judge that the cloud left not the Israelites till they came into the land of Canaan whither the Lord intended to bring them QUEST XXIII Of the foure great miracles which the Lord wrought for the people in the desert THis extraordinary leading of the people by the going before of the piller of the cloud and fire was one of the great miracles which the Lord wrought for his people in the desert for as foure things are chiefly necessary for those that travell strength and health of body foode rayment and a guide so the Lord in every one of these wrought wonderfully for them 1. Their feete did not swell for the 〈◊〉 of forty yeeres Deut. 8.4 And of all that great multitude there being not so few in all as 2000. thousand seeing the third part of this number even 600. thousand were fighting men above twenty yeere old there
33.7 yet they had their time of rest during this three dayes journey Perer. But when they removed from the wildernesse of Sinai they went three dayes together without any stay the Arke still going before them to find out a resting place Numb 10.13 till they came to Kibroth Hatavah which was their next mansion place Numb 33.16 The Lord still animating and strengthning his people to go forward Iunius The third manner of staying was when the cloud remained still upon the Tabernacle two or three dayes and then they pitched their tents and thus the cloud staied in 40. yeere not above 42. times for so many mansion or camping places they had as they are set downe Numb 33. 4. Now how to know when they were to pitch their tents Pererius conjectureth at it and giveth these three rules First if the cloud stayed about noone then they knew that it onely rested till they had refreshed themselves but if it staied in the afternoone before night that they journeyed no more that day they tooke it that then they were to stay there some while and so pitched their tents But if it made no stay till the evening they pitched no tents till the next morning and then if the cloud went not forward they then set up their tents These are onely Pererius conjectures and uncertaine And it otherwise may be gathered out of the Scripture that they did not pitch their tents till the cloud had staied two dayes at the least as we read Numb 9.20 When the cloud abode a few dayes in the Tabernacle they pitched their tents at the commandement of God and afterward vers 22. If the cloud tarried two dayes or a moneth or a yeere upon the Tabernacle the children of Israel pitched their tents It seemeth then by this that this was a rule unto them not to pitch their tents or settle their campe till after two dayes Beside they had Moses to give them direction also in this case when to encampe themselves who continually consulted with God 5. Now the manner of their removing was this when the cloud arose from the Tabernacle the Priests and Levites tooke up the Arke and carried it and when they went forward with the Arke Moses used this prayer Rise up O Lord and let thine enemies bee scattered and let them that hate thee flee before thee And when the Arke rested hee said Returne O Lord to the many thousands of Israel Numb 10.35 Hereunto the Prophet alludeth when hee saith The Lord shall arise and his enemies shall be scattered Perer. 6. This cloud began not onely now to appeare when they were come to their third mansion place in Etham as Hierome thinketh but straightway upon their setting forth from Ramesis though mention be made first of it here that proveth it not now first to have appeared as Moses is said first in this place to have taken Iosephs bones with him which was done notwithstanding at his first comming out of Egypt the Scripture observeth not alwayes the order of time in setting downe matters of historie but the coherence of the argument So neither did the cloud leave them at Aarons death as is the opinion of the Hebrewes for seven moneths after Aarons death who died in the fift moneth immediatly before Moses death when Iosuah was consecrated to succeed him mention is made of the piller of the cloud wherein the Lord appeared to Moses Deut. 31.15 See more of this quest 22. before 7. Gregorie maketh the appearing of the bright cloud by day a signe of Gods favour and mercie to his obedient people and the appearing of the terrible fire by night as a signe of his severitie and justice against the wicked and unbeleevers Gregor hom 21. in Evangel Ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the lawfull use of ceremonies Vers. 9. THis shall be as a signe unto thee upon thine hand c. As this place sheweth that there were then in the Church and so are still commendable ceremonies which the Lord hath instituted to be â—â—membrances of spirituall things as these were of their deliverance out of Egypt so their superstition is reproved that dwell in the externall ceremony not looking unto the spirituall sense Ferus as the Pharisies did which did weare their phylacteries and fringes yet forgot the law represented and signified by them 2. Doct. Christ the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament Vers. 21. IEhovah went before them He that is here called Iehovah is chap. 14.19 called the Angell of God which was none other but Jesus Christ Iun. the Prince and Captaine of his Church the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament according as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.9 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also is for ever 3. Doct. Christ sheweth us the way to the heavenly Canaan as the piller did direct the Israelites toward their Canaan Vers. 22. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of fire This piller divers wayes represented Christ 1. He is the piller and upholder of his Church 2. He leadeth us the way unto eternall life as he himselfe saith I am the way the truth and the life Ioh. 14. 3. Aperit nobis viam maris rubei id est gratiam baptismi sanguine suo rubentes He openeth to us the way of the red sea that is the grace of baptisme died red in his bloud Rupertus 4. Christ is both a fire and a cloud that is both God and man 5. In noctâ— veteris testamenti paucis lucebat c. He did shine but to a few in the night of the old Testament as this fierie cloud gave light by night Ferus 6. But the most lively signification is this that Christ is that covering cloud under whose shadow wee are defended from the heate and stormes of temptation as the Prophet sheweth Isai. 4.6 Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the theatricall Pagean of the Masse Vers. 9. THey shall be a signe unto thee upon thine head These externall signets upon the head and frontlets betweene the eyes instituted at the first to a good end to put them in minde alwayes of the law of God they afterward superstitiously abused onely glorying in the outward ostentation of them so in Poperie the right use of the Supper of the Lord is turned into theatricum quâ—ndam actum Missa into a theatricall shew of the Masse calling men à communione ad spectaculum from the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ to a gazing spectacle Simlerus 2. Conf. Against the adoration of reliques Vers. 19. MOses tooke the bones of Ioseph This maketh nothing for the adoration of the reliques of Saints which idolatrous use is still retained and practised in Poperie for Iosephs bones were carried to be buried they tooke up the bones of Saints and Martyrs after they have beene buried these were true bones they shew counters and ducks bones and such like trash for the bones of the Saints
of Israel Hierome numbreth them to have beene ten the first for want of water Exod. 17. the second likewise for water Numb 20. the third Exod. 14. when the Egyptians pursued them the fourth and fifth about Manna when they kept it till the morning and gathered it upon the Sabbath Exod. 16. The sixth murmuring was for flesh Exod. 16. and the seventh for flesh likewise Numb 11.4 The eighth for Moses absence when they made the golden Calfe the ninth when they tempted God in fighting against the Amalckites being forbidden Numb 14. The tenth upon the returne of the Spies which were sent to search the Land of Canaan Hieron dâ— 10. tentationib But if all the murmurings of the Israelites be summed together they will bee found more than ten not fewer than twenty And they were of three sorts either generall of the whole congregation or speciall of some few or particular of some principall persons 1. Their generall murmurings were upon these occasions first for things which they endured as the increasing of their bondage in Egypt at the first comming of Moses Exod. 5.21 their feare to be all destroyed of the Egyptians chap. 14.11 their wearinesse of the way Numb 11.1 their biting by Serpents Numb 21. Secondly for things which they wanted as for sweet and potable water Exod. 15.24 for bread chap. 16.3 for water in Rephidim Exod. 17. for flesh Numb 11. for water againe when Moses also offended Numb 20. Thirdly they murmured and disobeyed when any thing was imposed them which they liked not as twiâ—e they were disobedient about Manna in reserving it till the morning chap. 16.19 and in gathering it upon the Sabbath chap. 16.28 where although their murmuring be not expressed yet this their refractary disobedience could not bee without murmuring So they rebelled in fighting against the Amalekites and Canaanites being forbidden Numb 14.41 Fourthly they murmured when their expectation was deceived as upon Moses long absence Exod. 32.1 when they heard a false report of Canaan that the inhabitants thereof were invincible Numb 14. when Core Dathan and Abiram with their adherents were suddenly destroyed Numb 16.41 These murmurings in all were sixteene 2. The second kind of murmuring was of some speciall men as Core Dathan and Abirain with two hundred and 50. persons murmured against Moses and Aaron Numb 16.3 The third kind was of some principall persons as of Aaron and Miriam against Moses Numb 12. Of Moses himselfe at the waters of strife Numb 20. of Aaron being discontent and so negligent in his office because of the death of his two sonnes Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10.19 Here are foure more and unto these others by diligent observations may be added QUEST XXXIX Whether the wood had any vertue in it that Moses cast â—nto the water 25. ANd he cried unto the Lord and the Lord shewed him a tree 1. The Hebrewes thinke that this tree had no vertue at all in it to make the waters sweet but rather the contrary but that God would therein shew his power in healing one contrary by another as Elizeus did heale the waters by casting in of salt which was more like to have made them more bitter and our Saviour anointed the eyes of the blinde with clay and spittle which was an unlike thing to heale them 2. But it is more probable that there was some vertue in this wood to season and relish the water because it is said that the Lord shewed him or as the Hebrew word signifieth taught him the tree Tanquam tale jam liguâ—â—â—oc esseâ— quo posset hoc fieri As though it were such a kinde of wood as could doe this thing So Augustine reasoneth quaest 57. in Exod. to whom Calvinus and Simlerus consent for to what end else did the Lord direct Moses to that speciall tree more than to others unlesse we say that there were no trees there at all in the desert But the words will inferre another sense that seeing the Lord shewed him a tree there was a tree to be shewed as the Lord caused Hagar to see a fountaine not which newly sprung out of the ground but which was there before though she saw it not Gen. 21. The author of Ecclesiasticus chap. 38.5 affirmeth that there was vertue in the wood 3. But Iosephus is deceived who saith Moses fructum ligni accepit forte ibi jacens That Moses tooke a peece of wood lying there by chance whereas the Lord shewed it him and he further addeth that Moses did not cast in the wood because the people asked what it should doe but caused a great part of the water to bee drawne out of the fountaine and so the residue became sweet but this is also directly contrary to the text QUEST XL. Wherein the miracle consisted of healing the waters NOw although there were some vertue in this wood to heale the waters yet it was done not without a great mâ—racle 1. Which consisted not herein because the Lord Ostendit et lignum ubi nullum erat Shewed him a tree where none was for this is confuted before 2. Neither Quâ—a in tali natura ligni Creator demonstrator lâ—â—dandus est Because the Creator and shewer is to be praised in giving such a nature to the wood as Augustine in the same place for if the nature of the wood had done it it had not beene miraculous 3. But herein was the miracle that by the meanes of so small a peece of wood such a deale of water was changed as served such a great multitude Calvin And that it was suddenly and presently changed Simler And the waters were but made sweet only for that time and afterward returned to their bitter nature againe as Pliny before alleaged maketh mention of bitter waters there Iun. QUEST XLI Why the Lord used this meane in healing of the waters GOd could have healed the waters if it had pleased him without this tree But it pleased him to use this meanes for these causes 1. To teach us that we should not neglect the meanes which God appointed So the Lord divided the red sea and dried the way by a strong East winde Ezechias was healed by a lumpe of figges So God instructeth men and begetteth them to the faith by the ministery of men Simler 2. God hereby also reproveth their distrust and diffidence shewing Multa sibi in promptu esse remedia quibusque malis That he hath many remedies in store for whatsoever evils Calvin 3. Hoc medio uti voluit propter mysterium He would use this meane because of the mystery Ferus QUEST XLII Of the mysticall signification of this tree NOw what mystery is signified in this tree that sweetned the waters shall bee shewed in a word 1. Some by the bitter waters doe understand the killing letter of the Law which is impotable and unpleasant but being qualified by the Gospell Iam dulcâ—â— erit litera The letter of the Law becommeth pleasant Ferus 2. This tree was a figure of that rod
purpose not to returne convey much away Simler 4. Now further it is to be observed that this 15. day of the second moneth when Manna was given was the same day which was prescribed for them to keepe the Passeover in that were uncleane Numb 9. signifying thus much that the true Manna was not given to the Jewes which observed the first legall pasch but to the Gentiles which were uncleane through their filthy Idolatry Christ the true Passeover was offered and this was the second pasch under the Gospell which succeeded the first pasch under the Law Ferus ex Gloss. ordinar QUEST III. Whether all the children of Israel murmured Vers. 2. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured 1. The word Lun here used signifieth to persist as also to murmure but the latter is more proper they persisted obstinate and opposed themselves by their murmuring against Moses and Aaron 2. It is like that there were some godly persons among them that murmured not as Caleb and Ioshua but because they were but few in respect of the rest all are said to have murmured Lyran. and even the Saints also are not without some infirmities Ferus 3. The whole congregation therefore is said to murmure both because it was generall throughout the campe and in regard of the manner they assembled tumultuously against Moses and Aaron and shewed their discontent Simler 4. It is added in the desert to shew the cause of their murmuring the place where they were was barren and dry and yeelded no hope of any succour or comfort Iun. And beside their wretched nature appeareth that being in such misery and distresse which should have stirred them to prayer they fell to murmuring Simler 5. This famine then which they endured was the more grievous in these three regards because all their provision which they had brought out of Egypt was spent and there was small hope of any new supply in that vast and barren desert and beside the multitude was so great that a little provision would not suffice Borrh. 6. So for this cause all the congregation is said to murmure both to include the Levites who also murmured with the rest and there were beside other strange people mingled with the Israelites who set them on worke to murmure as we reade Numb 11.4 Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST IV. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. AGainst Aaron and Moses Yet afterward verse 8. they are said to have murmured not against them but against the Lord the reason is this 1. Because they were the servants and Ministers of God and he which murmureth against Gods Ministers contemneth God himselfe Genevens And Moses so saith Vt adversus illum se scirent murmurasse qui illos miserat That they should know that they had murmured against him who had sent them August quâ—st 59. in Exod. 2. They are said then to murmure against Moses and Aaron because their speech was directly against them and to them but in effect it was against the Lord because not Moses and Aaron but the Lord had brought them out of Egypt which the Israelites repented them of and were discontented with Lyran. and beside that which they murmured for the want of flesh and of bread Moses could not give them but God Thostat quaest 1. QUEST V. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites Vers. 3. O That we had died by the hand of the Lord c. These murmuring and obstinate Israelites doe diversly offend 1. In their ingratitude in extenuating the benefits which they had received upon every occasion they looke onely unto their present state and place where they were and thinke not of the place of bondage whence they were brought Pellic. 2. They preferre carnall things before spirituall the flesh-pots of Egypt before the glorious presence of God who now shewed himselfe visibly among them Ferus 3. They preferre their miserable bondage in Egypt with their grosse flesh-pots before their glorious liberty being in some want whereas men will even with the losse of their lives redeeme their liberty Marbach 4. Yea they untruly accuse Moses and Aaron as though they had brought them out for their destruction whereas they did therein nothing of their owne head but as the Lord directed them Ferus Pellican 5. Yea they call their glorious vocation from bondage to liberty a death and destruction Borrh. QUEST VI. How the Israelites are said to have fit by the flesh-pots of Egypt WHen we sate by the flesh pots 1. The word sir signifieth both a pot and a thorne because they used to hang their pots upon hookes of iron or wood like unto thornes and so the meaning is that they sate by the pot hangers whereon they used to hang their pots Oleaster 2. Some thinke this is spoken because they had flocks of cattell in Egypt whereof they might have fed if they would but they did rather use to eat of fish and fowle which they had there in abundance Gloss. ordinar 3. But though the Egyptians abstained from the flesh of bullocks and sheepe it is like the Israelites had their fill and their fitting by the flesh pots both noteth their security Lyran. and their carnall voracity and greedinesse Sedebant affectuoâ—e They sate gaping over the pots Tostat. They had cattell in the desert but if they should have eaten of them they might soone have killed them all up 4. But it is very like that they speake somewhat lavishly in the commendation of Egypt as Dathan and Abiram did call it a land that flowed with milke and hony Numb 16.13 of purpose to disgrace and diminish the true praise of the land of Canaan which indeed was the land that flowed with milke and hony 5. Some thinke further that they had no such store of cattell in the wildernesse because of the want of pasture oâ— that they spared that kinde of flesh lest they should want for sacrifice but it is not like that this people had any such religious thought at this time therefore it is more probable that they longed not for such kinde of flesh which was at hand but for the flesh of fowles such as they used to eat in Egypt and they wanted now for the nature of discontented people is to loath such things as they have and to covet and desire that which they have not and in that the Lord giveth them quailes it seemeth hee satisfied their owne desire but to their further hurt in sending that kinde of flesh which they lusted after Sic fore Gloss. Ordinar QUEST VII In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven Vers. 4. I Will cause bread to raine from heaven 1. Some thinke that by bread is understood generally any kinde of nourishment after the manner of the Hebrew phrase Gloss. ordinar Lyran. Oleaster But Augustines reason overthroweth this interpretation Nam isto nomine carnes complectuntur ipsa enim alimenta
not the names of the mansion places where they stayed but such as they passed by Tostat. ibid. 5. They are said to have journeyed at the mouth of God because they followed the direction of the cloud for when the cloud was taken up they journeyed and where it abode they pitched this was the commandement of God here spoken of as it is interpreted Numb 9.18 Tostat. Simler QUEST II. Of penury and want of water which the Israelites here endured Vers. 1. WHere was no water for the people to drinke c. 1. The Rabbines here are deceived which thinke that the thirst of the people here was not naturall and necessary for Manna was both meate and being full of moisture served for drinke say they but of wantonnesse rather The words of the text shew the contrarie that there was no water for the people to drinke and therefore it was a violent and necessary not a wanton and voluntary thirst Simler Calvin 2. Their conceit also hath no ground that thinke some of the people had water which they brought along with them from Elim and therefore they are said to tempt God to shew his power when there was no such necessitie Tostat. quast 2. For all the people murmured as though they were ready to die for thirst vers 3. 3. The truth is therefore that they were driven to great extremitie for want of water for drought and thirst is a great triall and a miserable calamity as is evident by divers examples in sacred and forren stories As Hagar with her sonne were ready to perish for want of water Gen. 21. And the three Kings that were to fight against Moab were like all to bee undone for want of water if the Lord by his Prophet had not relieved their want The men of Berhulia when the Citie was besieged fell downe and died for thirst The Samaritanes being assaulted by the Romanes died of thirst Thales Milesius as Laertius writeth perished through heate and thirst Ioannes Leo hath a memorable storie of certaine Merchants that perished by thirst in the desert of Azoad in Africa where are to be seene two Sepulchers the one of a Merchant the other of a Carrier of wares who sold unto the other a cup of water for a thousand crownes and yet the water not being able to suffice both they twaine died there Lysimachus yeelded himselfe and his whole host for want of water and having drunke being now become a captive he uttered these words O Dii inquit quam brevis voluptatis gratia ex rege me feci servum O God for how small a pleasure of a King have I made my selfe a captive Pelarg. QUEST III. Why it pleased God to prove his people with thirst NOw it pleased God as before hee tried his people with hunger so now with thirst for these causes 1. Because the people were very oblivious and forgetfull of Gods benefits God by afflictions would put them in mind of their dutie that they which in prosperitie did forget him by want and penurie might be driven to seeke him as it is in the Psalme When he slew them they sought him and returned 2. Another cause was in respect of themselves because they were a proud and haughtie people and thought well of themselves as the rebellious say unto Moses All the Congregation is holy Numb 16.3 therefore the Lord by this meanes would humble them and make them know themselves 3. The Lord being purposed to make the Israelites a peculiar people to himselfe and purposing to give unto them his lawes by this meanes would prove and trie them whether they would keepe his commandements Deut. 8.2 Even as a father nurtureth and schooleth his child whom he purposeth to make his heire so the Lord saith As a man nurtureth his sonne so the Lord thy God nurtureth thee Tostat. 4. The Lord also brought them into this strait that the faithfull thereby should be discerned from the rest for affliction and temptation is as a sieve to trie the chaffe from the wheat Ferus QUEST IV. How the people are said to tempt God Vers. 2. WHerefore doe yee tempt the Lord 1. Some will have them to tempt God because there were among the people that had water and yet would have God to helpe them when there was no need for then to expect or require the divine helpe when there is no urgent necessitie is to tempt God Tostat. But it is shewed before that this want of water was generall and all the people were in great extremity 2. They are therefore said to tempt God either because they doubted of his power and therefore would trie whether he could give them water for the word nasah signifieth properly to make triall as David is said not to have tried or proved before to goe with armour 1 Sam. 17.39 Oleaster Or they tempted God doubting of the truth of his promises as vers 7. Is God among us or no Pelarg. And so they tempted God by their incredulity Iun. Further they doe prescribe and limite God that unlesse he shew them some signe of his presence and power they will not beleeve that it was his will to bring them out of Egypt unto that place Marbach They doe tempt him also by their impatiencie they urge Moses presently to give them helpe or else they will stone him whereas they should patiently have waited upon God Simler And further though they are not herein said to tempt God expecting his helpe where all humane meanes counsell was denied yet herein they tempted him because they thought God was bound unto them to succour them at their need Lyran. Whereas the heathen by the light of nature could see and say Diis parentibus non possumus reddere aequalia Wee cannot recompense the Gods and our parents God is no way indebted unto man Tostat. quast 2. QUEST V. Of Moses feare lest he should be stoned Vers. 4. YEt a little while and they will stone me 1. Iosephus here somewhat altereth and transposeth the storie for this taking up of stones to cast at Moses hee placeth before the giving of Man when they murmured for food in the desert of Sin But this their violent and audacious enterprise fell out in Rephidim 2. This was not a carnall worldly or distrustfull feare in Moses but a naturall feare which a right perfect man is subject unto for so our Saviour saith My soule is heavie unto death Tostat. 3. Yet this feare of Moses was not so much in respect of his present danger as in regard of the people lest they if he should have beene slaine after his death might have fallen to Idolatrie Lyran. 4. Or he might feare lest if they should have killed him the Lord would have punished them and revenged his death as Ieremie saith in the like case As for me behold I am in your hand doe with me as you thinke good But know for a certaine if ye put me to death you shall surely bring
that it was inconvenient to have a Court consisting of so many which would have tended rather to confusion than setling of order the text saith that all these were heads of the people some were made rulers of 1000. some of 100. some of 50. c. vers 25. These divers names of rulers then have not relation to the number of the Judges but to the divisions of the people over whom they were set 3. The most usuall and received opinion is that this distribution of Officers was made according to the computation of those in the campe which were fit for warre who from 20. yeare to 60. were numbred to 600000. and above Numb 1. Lyran. Iun. But this is not like for whereas these officers were appointed not for military discipline but for the deciding of controversies and questions which might grow among them by this account all under 30. yeare and above 60. which were not meet for warre should be excluded whereas questions might arise among both the younger but especially the elder sort as well as among the rest Tostat. 4. Some thinke that this division was not in respect onely of the limits of the Judges but to reduce the people into order and to distribute them into their severall ranks and divisions because it is not like that such a multitude of suits should arise among them as that they needed so many officers for the rulers over tens in 600000. would come to 60000 Simler But it appeareth by Iethros motion that in this division he onely intended the peace and quietnesse of the people and Mosesâ—ase â—ase that they might without any great travell have their controversies ended neither is it like there were so many officers for not over every ten persons or polleâ— was an officer set but over every ten families as now shall be shewed 5. Wherefore this account of thousands hundreds c. might be made three wayes either reckoning those onely which were fit for warre which kind of account is before removed or by every single person and poll as they counted for the eating of the paschall Lambe chap. 12. and for the gathering of Manna chap. 16. But neither was this account here followed for then women and children should bee here reckoned whereas the one were under their parents and the other under their husbands government and their controversies might be ended at home and need not bee brought before the Judges The third way remaineth that this computation was made according to the families that over every ten families an officer should bee set Tostat. So by this meanes a goodly order was established that every Tribune or millenary officer had under him ten Centurians that iâ— officers over hundreds and every Centurian had under him two rulers over fifties and every ruler over fiftie had under him five which were set over ten Ferus Iosephus saith further that there were bands appointed of thirties and twenties but there is no such thing in the text QUEST XXI Of the number of these officers and of their continuance and succession Vers. 22. LEt them judge the people at all seasons 1. Concerning the number of these officers it is uncertaine Lyranus thinketh there were six hundred Tribunes or millenarie officers and six thousand Centurians and three score thousand set over tennes which number is rightly taken according to the summe of six hundred thousand But it is shewed before that in that number containing the summe onely of those which were fit for warre divers are not comprehended over whom the Judges were set for compounding of their controversies and therefore by that proportion the summe and number of the Judges cannot be taken And so it cannot certainly be defined the number of the families being not knowne over the which these officers were appointed how many these Rulers were in all Tostat. 2. In that they are said to judge at all seasons both the time of continuance in their office is signified which was during their life untill they were made unfit by reason of their age for then it is like they gave over their government as the Levites were freed at fiftie yeares from the service of the Tabernacle As also their diligence and attendance upon their office is noted that dayly and continually unlesse upon solemne and festivall dayes they attended the causes of the people 3. It is also evident that this Magistracie did not descend by succession from the father to the sonne but was conferred by election for whereas it is required that they should be good men fearing God and endued with other vertues this could not be perpetually observed if the sonnes had succeeded their fathers for a good father may sometime have a bad sonne as Hezekiah had Manasseh and an evill father may have a good sonne as Aâ—moâ— begat Iosias Ex Tostat. QUEST XXII The difference betweene Moses office and the rest Vers. 22. BVt every great matter let them bring to thee 1. There were two reasons why the great causes were reserved unto Moses hearing both because he was a Prophet and so consulted with the oracle of God and beside he was the chiefe Magistrate as in all Common-wealths appeale is made unto the Prince Simler 2. The greater matters were of two sorts either such as were of a divers kinde which concerned the worship of God and ceremonies of religion which wholly belonged unto Moses and the other Officers were not to meddle with them or else they were of the same kinde wherein the other used to deale but difficult and hard matters wherein they were to require Moses judgement as they did about the punishment of the blasphemer Levit. 24. and the violater of the Sabbath Numb 15. Tostat. 2. The smaller causes which were referred to the under Officers were pecuniary and civill causes the greater as capitall were reserved for Moses hearing for in these causes if there were any aggrievance the sentence might be reversed but when the sentence of death was inflicted it could not bee revoked therefore it is like that none was put to death without Moses consent and direction 3. In giving this advice Iethro intendeth two things both the case of Moses in dividing the burthen with others and the profit of the people that should not be wearied by this meanes by long attendance Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST XXIII Of the meaning of these words And God commmand thee Vers. 23. IF thou doe this thing and God so command thee 1. The Latine Translator readeth thus If thou doe this implebis imperium Deiâ— thou shalt fulfill the commandement of God whereof there may bee two senses given first that Iethro doth insinuate that this device and councell is of God the other that by this meanes he shall be able to discharge his office in governing and taking care for the people which thing God had commanded him Tostat. But this translation differing from the originall which hath and God command thee neither of these interpretations can stand 2. Some
LEt them bee ready on the third day c. 1. The opinion of some of the Rabbines is that this was not the 3. day of the moneth but the 6. day and the third from that time when the Lord thus spake to Moses for they say that upon the first day of the moneth Moses went up to God and received that message to bee delivered to the people and came downe the same day and stayed the next and reported not the answer of the people untill the 3. day R. Salom. Lyran. Cajetanus is of the same opinion that the first day of the moneth was but the 45. day after their departure out of Egypt and that the Lord upon the 48. day bid the people to bee ready against the third day after Contra. But this is not like for this would have shewed great negligence in Moses if he should have stayed so long before hee delivered the peoples minde to the Lord seeing mount Sinai was so neere unto the host 2. Some thinke that it was the third of the moneth and that it hath relation to the first day mentioned vers 1. Tostat. quaest 10. Gloss. ordin Ferus But this cannot stand neither for both Ferus and Gloss. interlin doe make the first day of the moneth but the 47. day then the third day wherein the law was given was but the 49. day but the day wherein the law was given is held of all to bee the Pentecost the 50. day Some to take away this doubt would borrow 17. dayes of the first moneth and 30. of the next and 3. of the third and so the publishing of the law shall fall out upon the 50. day So Augustine Gloss. ordin But there remained only 16. dayes of the first moneth to be counted the Passeover being kept upon the 14. day at even therefore they cannot make their reckoning of 17. dayes remaining in that moneth and to account 31. dayes unto the next moneth as some doe it was against the custome of the Hebrewes 3. Therefore it must thus be that on the first day of the moneth when the host was come into the wildernesse oâ— Sinai Moses went up to the Lord and came downe with the message to the people and then the next day went up with the peoples answer unto God for it is not like that all the host came thither and Moses went up and came downe and propounded the Lords words to the Elders and they to the people and received their answer and returned the same all upon one day And Cajetanes conceit herein is not to be refused that because the Lord saith To day and to morrow sanctifie them Insinuatur quod haec dicta fuerint manâ— It is insinuated that this was said in the morning This then was spoken upon the second day in the morning and the third day from thence was the law given which was not the third but the fourth day of the moneth Iun. Simler Rupertus also agreeth that the first day of the third moneth was the 47. day after the Passeover and that the fourth day after which was the 50. day Moses received the tables of the law but herein he differeth that the thicke cloud with the thunder and the lightning were seene and heard the day before which was the 49. But it is evident by the text that upon the third day was the voice of the Lord heard talking with Moses vers 19. QUEST XVII Whether the 15. day of the moneth were one of the fifty which went before the giving of the Law BUt here ariseth another doubt whether in the computation of these 50. dayes after the Passeover the next day after they had eaten the paschall lambe be included in that number or that there were fifty dayes beside 1. Some doe hold that the 15. day being the morrow after the Pasch must bee excluded because afterward in the law of the Pentecost they began the account of seven weekes upon the 16. day the morrow after the Sabbath or first solemne day of the Passeover as is further to be seene Lev. 23.11 and then after seven weekes complete the which make 49. dayes the next day which was the 50. was the day of Pentecost Cajetan But it is not necessary that this first 50. day should be accounted after that rule excluding the morrow after the Passeover as it may appeare partly by the text When yee bee come into the land which I shall give you vers 10. that law is made to bee kept after they were come to Canaan and the reason of this alteration was because they were to begin the account of the seven weekes from that day wherein they first put the sickle into the corne whereof they should bring a sheafe to shake before the Lord Deut. 16.9 which could not be done upon the first day of unleavened bread it being a solemne day and of the nature of a Sabbath wherein they were to doe no servile worke Levit. 23.7 Rupertus here agreeth that the Pentecost was not yeerely kept the just fiftith day after the Passeover as the law was given the fiftith day after the Passeover But herein he is deceived that upon what day soever the Passeover fell in the weeke they did expect the morrow after the next Sabbath when they were to bring in their sheafe and then beginne to count their seven weekes for herein is his errour he taketh the Sabbath there spoken of Levit. 23.10 for the seventh day of rest where it is understood to be the first day of unleavened bread which was a solemne day of rest as the Sabbath was Iun. Borrh. And by the way Rupertus in the same place slippeth in another point Prima dies azymorum Iudaeis in quintam feriam illo anno evenit The first day of unleavened happened to the Iewes that yeere upon the fifth day of the weeke For true it is that our blessed Saviour did eat the Passeover according to the law upon the 14. day which was as our Thursday at even but the Jewes following a tradition of their owne to avoid the concurrence of two Sabbath dayes did put off the eating of the Passeover untill the 15. day of the moneth at even which was the sixth day of the weeke because the next day was the Sabbath for if they had eat the Passeover when Christ did eat it with his Disciples then the next day should have beene kept holy neither were they to doe any worke therein but upon that day they put Christ to death which could not be done without more than servile labour in carrying the crosse and nailing Christ unto it and such like beside the text saith they would not put Christ to death upon the feast day lest there should bee some tumult among the people Mark 14.2 But this point is elsewhere handled more at large whither I referre the Reader 2. Some againe as Cajetane before excludeth the 15. day of the moneth out of the number of the 50. dayes
God had no care of the Gentiles as of his owne people that were espoused unto him he is not said to be jealous of them 2. Hee suffered them to walke after their owne lusts not because hee could not have hindred them but the wise Creator permitteth the reasonable creature to follow the instinct of their nature yet calling some by grace whom he pleaseth and punishing the rest for abusing the light of nature who therefore were left inexcusable because knowing God by the creatures they yet did not glorifie him as God as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 1.21 QUEST V. Of the titles which the Lord here giveth himselfe and wherefore I Am the Lord thy God strong jealous c. The Lord giveth unto himselfe here foure severall titles the more to inforce this commination following 1. He calleth himselfe their God because he had taken them into his speciall protection and had bestowed many benefits upon them therefore they ought to love him more than any other Tostat. 2. He is a strong God potest se veluno nutu vindicare which can revenge himselfe at his becke Lippom. And he is strong as well to effect his promises to the obedient as to punish the disobedient Vrsin 3 Zelotes est nolens habere consortium in amando He is jealous he can abide no partner in that which he loveth Tostat. And this as well signifieth his indignation qua commovetur suis contumeliis whereby he is moved for the contumelies that are offered unto him Vatabl. as the love of God toward them for jealousie ariseth ex amore ejus qui laditur propter turpitudinem c. from the love of him that is hurt because of some uncleannesse committed c. Vrsin 4. Lastly in saying visiting the iniquitie he sheweth his severitie in tantum non connivet ad impietatem c. he is so farre from winking at impietie that hee punisheth it even in the posterity of the wicked and their sonnes and nephewes Lippom. QUEST 6. Of the generall commination and promise annexed VIsiting the iniquitie c. 1. Some take this to be a speciall perswasion added to this commandement Quia inter omnia praecepta nullum majus est quam hoc Because there is none among all the precepts greater than this The generall motive was set before because he brought them out of the land of Egypt Tostat. 2. But I approve rather their opinion which take this commination and promise to appertaine unto all the commandements but to be joyned to this because it is fundamentum caeterorum the foundation of the rest Vrsin Huic mandato tanquam principali ex quo alia oriuntur addidit Dominus minas c. To this commandement as the principall out of the which the other take their beginning the Lord added threatnings and promises c. Lippom. And this is confirmed by the words here following vers 6. to them that love me and keepe my commandements the Lord maketh mention of keeping his commandements not of one but of all 3. It might have pleased God simply to have propounded his commandements but he both adjoyneth promises to stirre up our dulnesse and threatnings to terrifie the perverse and froward which promises are rendred not as the deserved reward of our obedience for it is of mercie as the Lord saith shewing mercie unto thousands otherwise we doe no more than our dutie and therefore deserve nothing Simler QUEST VII How it standeth with Gods justice to punish the children for the fathers sinnes THe iniquitie of the fathers upon the children c. 1. Theodoret upon this place hath this singular opinion by himselfe Quod nudae literae insistere impium sit c. That it is evill to insist here upon the bare letter seeing the law saith The fathers shall not be put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but every man shall be put to death for his owne sinne Deut. 24.16 And he addeth further Majores apud Deum sunt comminationes quà m poenae c. That God useth greater threatnings than punishments as every one that was not circumcised at the eight day is threatned to be cut off and yet many in the desert were uncircumcised at that age whom Ioshua circumcised in Gilgal and so here he thinketh that this is threatned onely to terrifie parents from sinning So Theodoret. Contra. 1. But this were to give great libertie to offenders to thinke that God onely threatneth for terror it might be inferred as well that God doth but dallie also with his promises as with his threatnings which were impious to thinke 2. If God doe not alwayes punish as hee threatneth it doth not argue any revocation of his judgements but his mercifull forbearing to call men unto repentance 3. That commination against the neglect of circumcision is not denounced against the infant whose fault it was not if he were not circumcised the eight day but against them that did not see it performed on their infant as appeareth by the example of Moses Exod. 4. punished for the neglect of circumcision And so accordingly all they which deferred the circumcision of their children in the wildernesse their carkase◠fell there 2. Origene maketh this allegoricall exposition The father that sinneth he maketh the Devill Pater peccati diabolus est The devill is the father of sinne all they are his children which doe his works Diabolus ergo dum hic mundus stat non recipit sua peccata c. The devill while this world standeth doth not receive punishment for his sinnes redduntur infilios i. in eos quos genuit per peccatum but upon his children whom he hath begotten by sinne are their sinnes rendred for men while they are in the flesh are corrected of God c. Contra. But that this is a forced and farre fetcht exposition the other opposite part manifesteth of the Lords shewing mercie unto thousands but the devils expect no mercie And againe seeing this commination is specially made to terrifie wicked parents it can no wayes concerne the Devill to whom the law was not given but unto men 3. Hugo de S. Victor giveth this reason why children are punished for the sinnes of their fathers because they are Sicut aliquod membrum ipsorum quia in ipsis malefactoribus quo dammodo erant seminaliter peccabant They are as a part of them because they were in seed in the malefactors themselves and so in a manner sinned in them Contra. But the Prophet saith the same soule that sinneth shall die the children being but yet in the loynes of their fathers as the tree in the seed had no soules therefore then could they not sinne 4. Some doe reconcile this law and that other Deut. 24. where it is said that the fathers shall not be put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers after this manner that there a rule is given for the proceedings in civill judgement that one shall not suffer for another
bloud Galas 5. Polluitur foedatur terra yea the land it selfe is polluted and defiled with bloud Numb 35.36 Galas 6. Mans bodie is the temple of the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 6.16 If any then destroy the temple of God him will God destroy 1 Cor. 3.17 7. The murtherer also sinneth against Christ whose member his neighbour is whose life hee hath sought So reasoneth the Apostle but in a divers case that he which causeth the weake brother to perish for whom Christ died sinneth against Christ himselfe 1 Cor. 8.11 QUEST XI How diversly murder is committed THis kinde of externall and actuall murther is committed two wayes either by a man himselfe or by another 1. The first is done two wayes either by the cruell shedding of mans bloud which is the most grievous sinne of all or by neglecting the meanes and not preserving our neighbours life either by helpe or counsell when it is in our power as the rich man suffered Lazarus for want of reliefe to perish at his gate Luk. 16. So the Priest and Levite passed by the man that had beene wounded of the theeves and was left for halfe dead and had no compassion of him Luk. 10. So the Wise-man saith in the Proverbs chap. 24.11 Deliver them that are drawne to death and wilt thou not preserve them that are led to bee slaine Isidore saith Qui incurrit in nudum esurientem c. He that meeteth with a man readie to perish for hunger and cold if he doe not give him meat and raiment homicida tenebitur shall be counted a murtherer So Gloss. interlinear A man committeth murther manu vel mente vel subtrahendo auxilium aut consilium c. with his hand with his heart and when he withdraweth his helpe and counsell 2. A man killeth by another two wayes consensu by giving consent as Saul did when Stephen was put to death keeping their garments that stoned him Act. 7.58 And the people crucified Christ calling unto Pilate Crucifie him Mandato voluntate By willing and commanding ones death as David did contrive Vrias death and Iezabel Naboths Bastingius QUEST XII Of the divers kinds of murder THere are divers kinds of killing 1. There is a lawfull killing or taking away of the life by the Magistrate as either in putting malefactors to death or in just warre where much bloud is shed 2. There is another kinde altogether unlawfull and inexcusable which is called wilfull murther when any of hatred smiteth a man that he die or of purpose lie in wait for him Numb 35.20 So Ioab wilfully killed Abner and Amasa 3. There is a third kinde of involuntarie murther when a man lieth not in wait but God offereth him unto him Exod. 21.13 For though such things seeme to us to fall out by chance yet all things are ordered and disposed by Gods providence and with him nothing happeneth by chance of this kinde there are three sorts 1. When two doe of a sudden having no purpose before fight together and the one killeth the other as striving upon the way or falling out upon any other sudden and unthought of occasion this is called manslaughter as Abner killed Asahel that met him and pursued him in battell this kinde is not so hainous as wilfull murther yet it far exceedeth these other kinds that follow 2. Sometime one is killed by chance which is of two sorts either a chance which falleth out by meere oversight and negligence as if a Physitian through carelesnesse mistake the medicine and so kill his patient which might by his care have beene prevented or it falleth out by meere chance which could not be helped as when one heweth wood and the axe-head flieth off and killeth one that standeth by 3. But that kinde which deserveth most favour and may best be excused is when one is forced to kill another se defendendo by defending of himselfe which was the womans case that with a milstone pashed out cruell Abimelechs braines when he attempted to set fire upon the tower and to burne the woman and all the rest of the people there Iudg. 9. QUEST XIII Magistrates are not guiltie of murder in putting malefactors to death ALl kinde of killing is not then unlawfull whereof there are three sorts there is divina vindicta heroica ordinata divine revenge heroicall ordinarie 1. The divine is which is directly and immediatly commanded by God as Abraham at the Lords bidding would have sacrificed his sonne Abraham non solum non est culpatus crudâ—litatis crimine sed laudatus est pietatis nomine Abraham was not onely 〈◊〉 blamed for his crueltie but commended for his pietie therein So Ioshua had commandement from the Lord to destroy the Canaanites 2. The heroicall kinde of killing is when any being inflamed with the zeale of Gods glorie and extraordinarily stirred by his spirit doe take revenge of the Lords enemies as Sampson upon the Philistims in his death Phineas in zeale killed the adulterer and adulteresse and Samuel hewed Agag the King of Amalek in peeces Marbach 3. The ordinarie killing is by the Magistrate who by direction of the word of God and according to wholesome lawes grounded upon the same doth give sentence of death against malefactors or wageth just battell upon these occasions the Magistrate sinneth not in shedding of bloud The reasons are these 1. Hierome saith Homicidas punire non est sanguinis effusio sed legis ministerium To punish murtherers and other malefactors it is no effusion of bloud but the execution of the law in Ieremiam c. 22. So Gloss. interlinear Index non occidit reum sed lex quae jubet The Judge killeth not the guiltie partie but the law which commandeth 2. Thomas saith Id quod licitum est Deo licitum est ministro ipsius per mandatum ejus That which is lawfull unto God the author of the law is lawfull unto Gods Minister by his Commandement But the Magistrate is Gods Minister Rom. 13.4 2. Places of Doctrine upon the sixth Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall contents of this Commandement THou shalt not kill This Commandement consisteth 1. Partly in prohibiting all kinde of hurt or wrong to our neighbour either in leaving or forsaking him or in doing him hurt either outwardly by murder rayling reviling or by any injurie whatsoever or inwardly by anger hatred desire of revenge 2. Partly in commanding the preservation of our neighbours life either in not hurting whether provoked or not provoked or in helping either by the depulsion of wrongs and injuries offred or by the collation of benefits 2. Doct. The particular vertues here commanded THe vertues then prescribed in this Commandement are of two sorts either such as doe not hurt or such as are beside helping also Of the first kinde are 1. A particular justice and equitie in all our acts and doings not to hurt or molest any in word or deed by violence fraud or negligence or by any other meanes such an one
first that it is no murther when one is justly slaine and in the other that it is no breach of the Sabbath when necessitie compelleth to breake the rest thereof 1. This were a dispensation to make it lawfull to kill where one cannot justly be put to death and to worke upon the Sabbath where there is no necessitie 2. And a dispensation maketh that lawfull afterward which was not before such dispensation but it was alwayes lawfull both for the Magistrate to put to death and upon like necessitie to intermit or suspend the rest of the Sabbath 3. Beside these interpretations and declarations of these lawes are not devised by man but warranted in Scripture by the Lord himselfe the maker and author of the law and therefore they are not interposed by any humane authoritie Tostat. quast 35. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Why covetousnesse is to be taken heed of THou shalt not covet c. Men must not onely withdraw their hands from taking their neighbours goods but restraine their inward coveting and desire and that for these reasons 1. Propter concupiscentiae infinitatem because concupiscence is infinite the desire of the covetous is never satisfied as Isay 5.8 They joyne house to house c. till there be no more place 2. Aufert quietem it taketh away quietnesse Eccles. 5.11 The satiâ—â—ie of the rich will not suffer him to sleepe 3. Facit divitias inutiles it maketh riches unprofitable Hee that loveth riches shall be without the fruit thereof Eccles. 5.9 4. Tollit justitiâ—â—quitatem it hindreth justice For rewards doe blind the wise and pervert the words of the just Exod. 23. 5. Necat charitatem it killeth charitie both of God and our neighbour therefore the Prophet saith Hide not thy selfe from thine owne flesh Isay 58.7 The covetous despiseth his brother who is as his owne flesh 6. Producit omnem iniquitatem it bringeth forth all iniquitie as S. Paul saith 1 Tim. 6.10 The desire of money is the root of all evill Thom. in opuscul 2. Observ. Of the remedies against concupiscence THe remedies against concupiscence are these Basil assigneth these two 1. Si cogitaveris quòd dissolvendus es in terram cessabit insana concupiscentia c. If thou bethinke thy selfe that thou shalt bee dissolved into earth unsound concupiscence will cease 2. Meliorum desiderium minora cogit contemâ—ere The desire of better things will make thee contemne the lesse as the love to the Word of God which is more to be desired than gold will withdraw our love from earthly things Basil. in regula Thomas Aquiâ— addeth foure remedies beside 3. Occasiones exteriores fugiendo By shunning all externall occasions as Iob made a covenant with his eyes chap. 31.1 4. Cogitationibus aditum non praebendo In giving no way to the thoughts as by humbling and afflicting the bodie as S. Paul did 1 Corinth 9.27 5. Orationibus insistendo By applying prayer as our blessed Saviour saith that even devils may bee cast out by fasting and prayer Matth. 17.21 6. Licitis occupationibus insistendo c. By being alwayes well occupied for idlenesse brought the Sodomites to lust it was one of their sinnes Ezech. 16.49 Thom. in opuscul 3. Observ. How the Lord hath punished the transgressors of his law THou shalt not covet In the last place I will shew how the Lord hath punished and judged the transgressors of this precept and likewise of the rest The punishment then which is due for the transgression of the law is either divine or humane The humane is that which is inflicted by the lawes of men which are divers according to divers usages of countries and conditions of people among whom one vice may reigne more than another and so more severitie is required But this defect generally is found in humane censures that the transgressions of the second table are more severely punished than those of the first and those in the second which doe concerne mans outward state as theft are more straightly punished than adulterie which Augustine found fault with in his time and he giveth this reason of this partialitie Quia id pejus credimus quod huic vitae nocet Because we thinke that the worse or greater evill which hurteth this life Lib. de Mendac cap. 9. The divine punishment is of two sorts it is either temporall in this life or eternall in the next And for the first where humane lawes are silent or connivent in censuring the sinnes of men yet the divine justice sheweth it selfe As now shall appeare in this particular enumeration of divers presidents and examples of Gods severitie exercised and shewed upon the transgressors of his law 1. Pharaoh is set forth as an example of an Atheist and prophane person who would not acknowledge the God of Israel but said I know not the Lord neither will I let Israel goe Exod. 5.2 who manifestly transgressed the first precept his end was to be drowned in the red Sea 2. Senacherib a most grosse Idolater as he was worshipping his Idoll Nisroch in the temple was slaine of his two sonnes 2 King 19.37 3. He which blasphemed the name of the Lord in the host of Israel was by the Lords commandement stoned to death Levit. 24.11 4. The man also which gathered sticks upon the Sabbath because he did it with an high hand and is contempt was stoned by Gods appointment Numb 15.31 5. Abshalom both a disobedient childe to his father and a rebell against his Prince was hanged by the haire of the head and stricken through with darts and so is made a spectacle unto all stubborne children and rebellious subjects that such should expect the like judgement at Gods hand 6. Cain for killing his innocent brother was cast out of Gods presence and made a runnagate upon the face of the earth Cruell Abimelech as he slew 70. of his brethren upon one stone so his braines were dasht out with a stone Iudg. 9. 7. Ammon an incestuous person was slaine by the procurement of his owne brother Abshalom for the deflouring of his sister Thamar 2 Sam. 13. That whore and strumpet Iezabel was eaten and devoured of dogges 1 King 21.23 2 King 9.22.35 And as adulterie is an abomination to the Lord the punishment whereof God reserveth to himselfe where the Magistrates hand is not extended as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.4 Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge So the sinne of drunkennesse and glutâ—onie shall not escape the stroke of Gods hand as being the nurserie and seminarie of filthinesse and uncleane lust Drunken Nabal for that sinne and others joyned withall was smitten of the Lord and died 1 Sam. 25.38 And that rich Glutton who pampred himselfe but was mercilesse toward poore Lazarus was tormented in hell Luk. 16. And here I cannot omit to make mention of a strange judgement of God shewed of late upon three persons for this sinne of excessive drinking which happened upon the 27. day of December last being
any man there no word is expressed of the intention as here Contra. 1. By neighbour any man whosoever is understood 2. And expresse mention is made here of the will and intention because it is an explanation of the former law Simler 3. Iunius thinketh that not he onely which killeth sed qui conatus est occidere but went about to kill is comprehended in this law as Deut. 19.19 Ye shall doe unto him as he had thought to doe unto his brother Contra. 1. It seemeth by the generall law vers 12. that this constitution is onely for murther committed and not intended onely for such smiting the law speaketh of whereupon death followeth 2. That law given in instance Deut. 19. is touching false witnesses whose false testimonie breaketh out into action into false witnesse bearing so that there is not an intention onely for the false witnesse by his false testimonie acteth as much as in him lieth to take away the life of his brother that place therefore is impertinent to this purpose I approve here rather the judgement of Cajetane Nec describuntur haec intus in animo sed prodeuntia extra in actiones Neither are these things described onely in the minde but proceeding without into action QUEST XLI Of the difference betweene voluntarie and involuntarie murther and the divers kinds of each HEre then there is a manifest distinction of involuntarie and voluntarie murther or killing grounded upon the law of Moses· 1. Involuntarie killing is of two sorts there are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chances unlooked for and sudden events as when one shooteth an arrow and killeth one unawares as Peleus killed his sonne being in hunting with him There are beside these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 errors and oversights as the father beateth his childe purposing onely to chastise him and hee dieth of that beating a Physition ministreth physick to his patient intending to cure him and doe him good and he dieth of it Borrh. 2. There are likewise two kinds of voluntarie or wilfull murther ex proposito of purpose ex impetu animi in heat or rage These kinde of murthers are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 iniquities one may be slaine ex proposito purposely either per insidias by lying in wait when one watcheth for the life of a man and taketh him at advantage as Ioab killed Abner and afterward Amasa they suspecting no such thing so Ismael killed Gedoliah Ierem. 41. Or els per industriam when one of set purpose picketh quarrels and seeketh occasions to provoke a man that he may kill him both these kinds are touched here Tostat. quaest 16. Then one may bee killed in heat and rage when there was no purpose before as Alexander the Great killed Clitus Pelarg. This kinde though not so grievous as the other yet is a kinde of voluntarie killing So there is extant a constitution of Hadrian the Emperour against him qui per lasciviam causam mortis praebuisset which was the cause of anothers death through wantonnesse and riot though there were no enmitie before that such an one should be banished five yeeres Simler QUEST XLII Why the wilfull murtherer was to be taken from the Altar Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar 1. This may bee understood either of the Altar of incense which was in the holy place or of the Altar of burnt offring rather which was without the Tabernacle in the Court for thither every one might easily flee that had committed any such offence but to the Arke no escape could be made because there was no entrance thither 2. R. Salomon saith that this is meant even of the Priest that sacrificed at the Altar who after he had finished his service at the Altar might be taken thence and judged by the law as other malefactors and murtherers Which collection of his may be received saving that it is not like they would suffer a murtherous Priest to minister at the Altar 3. But that other conceit of R. Salomon whom Lyranus followeth hath no good ground that he that had killed an Hebrew wilfully might be taken from the Altar as Ioab was but if he had onely killed a Gentile as a Moabite or Ammonite though of set purpose he was not to be taken thence but was privileged by the Altar But the contrarie appeareth that this law forbiddeth all voluntarie and wilfull murther whether of Hebrew or Gentile for it was more to kill a Gentile being free then a Gentile that was a servant or bondman but the master was to die for it if he beat his servant to death so that he died under his hand vers 20. which law must be understood of strangers and aliens that were servants not of Hebrewes for they were not to deale so cruelly with them Levit. 25.38 Iun. much more therefore were they to die if they of purpose killed any free stranger Tostat. 4. If therefore the wilfull murther as well of strangers as Hebrewes be here forbidden then both for the one murther and for the other might they be taken even from the Altar 5. And the reason thereof was this because they which did flee to Gods Altar eum tanquam patronum judicem innocentiae suae implorabani did sue unto God as the patron and Judge of their innocency therefore they therein abusing Gods name were to be expelled thence Gallas QUEST XLIII What manner of smiting of parents is forbidden Vers. 15. HE that smiteth his father and mother c. 1. The very smiting of the father or mother deserveth death although they die not of such smiting Cajetan Iun. as may appeare vers 12. where is directly expressed concerning the smiting of another if hee die then the smiter shall bee put to death Piscator 2. R. Salomon understandeth that this is not meant of every smiting but when upon the smiting â—he effusion of bloud followeth or some scarre or wound is caused But the very smiting of either of the parents sheweth the malice and disobedience of the childe for the which he is worthie to die as Deut. 21.18 the sonne for his stubbornnesse and disobedience was to be stoned to death Indeed for every blow or smiting the childe was not to die if it were done unwittingly or unawares but if it were done of purpose he deserved death 3. And the reason is because of the authoritie of the parents which is the next unto God Simler Deo parentibus non possumus reddere aequalia c. Wee can never make amends unto God and our parents Cajetan As also they seeme not to be worthie of life which are injurious to those by whom they received their life Gallas QUEST XLIV Of the grievous sinne of paricide THough there be no expresse mention here of those that kill their parents yet it followeth necessarily that if it be a sinne worthie of death to smite them much more to kill them 1. This even among the Heathen was counted so hainous a sinne that they thought none
so wicked that would commit paricide and therefore Solon that wise law-maker among the Athenians maketh no mention of paricide nor yet the Romans had any law against such untill the 642. yeare from the building of the Citie which was the 100. yeare before the nativitie of Christ one Publicius Malcolus with the helpe of his servants killed his mother against whom the Citie decreed this punishment that he should be put into a sacke together with a Cocke an Ape a Viper and a Dogge and so cast into the water Tostat. quaest 17. The Egyptians caused such first to be beaten with thornes and then to be burnt with thornes The Macedonians did stone them to death Pelarg. Plato lib. 9. de legibus would have such grievously punished unto death and then to be left unburied 2. It is a like sinne to kill the father as to doe it to the mother yet the father is set before as the more honourable person and fewer examples are extant of those that have killed their fathers than of the other Oedipus is said unwittingly to have killed his father Laius King of Thebes taking him for his enemie But Orestes killed his mother Cliteâ—nestra Agamemnons wife wittingly so did Alcmeon his mother being charged so to doe by his father Amphiaraus being slaine in the Thebane warre to the which his wife perswaded him to goe and therefore being deadly wounded he commanded his sonne to kill her Ninia likewise the sonne of Ninus killed his mother Semiramis after he had carnally knowne her Such beastly examples of paricide Heathen histories afford who not knowing God were without naturall affection and disobedient to parents which were the sinnes of the Heathen Rom. 1.30 Some write that Iudas killed his father and married his mother Tostat. qu. 17. But it is not like that if Iudas had so apparently shewed his wickednesse before that our blessed Saviour would have chosen him to be one of his Apostles QUEST XLV The law of man-stealing expounded Vers. 16. HE that stealeth a man and selleth him or it be found with him c. 1. Some understand if it be found with the buyer that is the man that is stollen be found sold over and delivered to the buyer Oleaster But then there should be a repetition of the same thing for as much was said before and selleth him there cannot be a seller without a buyer 2. Some doe thus expound if it be found that is proved by him that he hath stolen a man So Lyran. Tostat. Vatab Simler and the Latine text expresseth the same sense convictus noxae if he be convicted of the offence But this clause had beene superfluous for this must be understood in all lawes that the offence must be sufficiently proved before it be censured Againe in this sense the law should be imperfect not determining what should become of him that had stolen a man onely and not sold him some say restitution should be made by the like he should give two men for one or give the price of two men But this is no where to be found restitution indeed was to be made in the theft of other things Exod. 22.1 but there was not the like reason for men 3. Therefore the meaning is this that if one steale a man whether he have sold him and delivered him over or if he be found with him as yet unsold in both cases he should suffer death for his malice appeared evidently in the stealing onely that he intended to sell him over Iun. Gallas Osiand So also Lippom. he was to be put to death if the theft were yet found with him propter crudelissimum institutum for his cruell enterprise how much more si desperata fuerit venditi redemptio if being sold he were past redemption 4. By the ancient Romane lawes such men-stealers were condemned to the metal mines by a latter law of Constantine they were to be cast unto the wilde beasts Simler QUEST XLVI The reason why man-stealing was punished by death THe reasons why this kinde of theft in stealing of men was so severely punished with death were these 1. Because man was created according to Gods image therefore in respect of the excellencie and preeminence of the thing that was stolen the punishment ought to be the greater 2. Because by this meanes he that was sold lost his libertie which is as precious as life it selfe and to bring a man into servitude quid aliud quà m sexcentis eum mortibus objicere what was it else than to expose him to an hundred deaths Gallas 3. And beside they could not steale men and sell them to the Israelites but it would bee knowne and therefore it is like that after they had stolen them they sold them over to the Gentiles and so they were in danger that were so sold over to be corrupted in religion and seduced to idolatrie and so drawne away from the service of God and by this meanes be brought into bondage both in soule and bodie Simler The Interlinearie Glosse therefore thus expoundeth diabolo obnoxium fâ—cerit hath sold him that is brought him into the devils service 4. Of this sinne were Iosephs brethren guiltie in selling him over to the idolatrous Egyptians who therein had a vaine perswasion that they were not guiltie of his bloud because they spared his life but in selling him over to bee a slave and that to an idolatrous people as much as in them lay eum è medio sustulerunt they tooke him away as out of the world Gallasius QUEST XLVII What kinde of cursing of parents is here understood Vers. 17. HE that curseth his father or mother c. 1. There are two kinds of cursing one assumpto Dei nomine when Gods name is taken in vaine withall another is without Borrhaius Lippoman thinketh that this is understood of the first kinde But seeing the blaspheming of the name of God deserved death of it selfe Levit. 24. and this law doth properly punish the cursing and blaspheming of the parents it seemeth generally to be intended against all kinde of cursing and wiâ—hing evill unto the parents 2. And it seemeth to be understood of an use and custome of cursing not of every railing word which sometime should bee uttered by the childe in rage and heat for every such word to inflict death upon the childe would be thought too hard sed ille qui assuefactus est maledicere patri maetri c. but he that is accustomed to curse his father and mother and that for small matters deserveth death Tostat. as that law against disobedient children Deut. 21.18 is made against those that are incorrigible and are confirmed in their disobedience and stubbornnesse So also Cajetane As he that smiteth them is worthie of death so he that curseth nisi imperfectio actus excuset puta si non deliberato aut leve verbum c. unlesse the imperfection of the act excuse or he speake a light word of railing c. 3. And as
the oxe is specially mentioned because the Hebrewes were most given to keeping of cattell their horse were for the most part brought out of Egypt Simler 2. It is understood to be such a goring and wounding as that death followed upon it for otherwise though one were sore wounded with the push of an oxe if he died not the oxe was not in this case to be stoned Tostat. 3. But that other conceit of Tostatus in this place is not so good secus est si calce petierit c. It is otherwise if the oxe strike with his heele not with his horne in this case the oxe is not to die because it was his fault that stood within the reach of the oxes heele whereas he pursueth after men to gore them with his horne for what saith he then to the horse heele if any were stricken to death therewith was not the horse to be killed by the equitie of this law as Lippoman expoundeth it as well de equo calcitroso of a striking horse as of a pushing oxe If this law provideth for the stroke of the horse heele why not for the oxe hee le also And this is yet more evident Gen. 9.5 that the Lord will require mans bloud at the hand of every beast the heele is as well the oxe hand as his horne By what meanes soever then a beast killeth a man this law was to take place QUEST LXIII Why the oxe that goared was commanded to be stoned to death Vers. 28. THe oxe shall be stoned to death c. 1. Though a bruit beast cannot sinne and therefore this punishment is not inflicted for any sinne committed by the beast yet it is in joyned ad horrorem facti for the horror of the fact Tostat. 2. Quia esset horribilis ad videndum c. Because the sight of such a bloodie beast would be horrible and grievous to men Lyran. 3. And it might be feared lest such a dangerous beast if he should live should kill others also Simler 4. This was also provided for the masters advantage who was bound to make good all losses which should fall out afterward by his beast which used to push Tostat. 5. And by this law men are given to understand that if bruit beasts are not spared much lesse shall they goe unpunished if they shed mans bloud Gallas 6. The equitie also of this law herein appeareth that sicut creati sunt boves in hominum gratiam c. That as oxen were created for mans sake so they should serve for the use of man whether by their life or death Calvin 6. Agreeable to this law of Moses as grounded upon the law of nature were the like constitutions among the Heathen as Solon made a law in Athens that if a dogge had bitten a man hee should be tied in an halter and delivered to him that was hurt So among the Romanes in their 12. tables it was decreed that if a beast had done any hurt Dominus aut litis astimationem solvito aut eam noxa dedito The owner should either pay aâ— was awarded or deliver up his beast to punishment Draco also was the author of this law in Athens that not onely men but beasts yea things without life that had beene the meanes of any mans death should be banished out of the countrie and cast out whereupon the image of Theogenes among the Thrasians falling upon one and killing him was adjudged to be cast into the Sea Simler QUEST LXIV Why the flesh of the oxe was not to be eaten ANd his flesh shall not bee eaten 1. It was neither lawfull for them to eat the flesh themselves nor yet to sell it to the Gentiles as they might doe other things that died alone Deut. 1â— 21 Iun. But the flesh should be cast away as a cursed and abominable thing 2. Not so much because being stoned to death it was as a thing suffocated and so they should have eaten it with the bloud Simler Osiander But tanquam aliquid maledictum c. as a thing accursed they were to abhorre the flesh of such a bloudie beastâ— so that although the owner should slay this murtherous oxe before it were stoned it was not lawâ—ull to eat the flesh thereof Tostat. quaest 30. 3. And this was tum propter horrorem factâ— both for the horror of the fact tum quia per hoc damnificabatâ—â— Dominus bovis and by this meanes also the owner of the oxe was damnified the flesh thereof being unprofitable for any thing that he might be more â—autelâ—â—â— afterward and take better heed to his cattell Lyranus 4. The Hebrewes addâ— further that the very skin of the oxe was not to be used to any purpose but the whole to be cast away as a thing abominable Tostat. quaest 28. QUEST LXV In what case the owner is to die when his oxe goared any to death Vers 29. IF the oxe were wont to push c. Another case is put when the oxe chanceth to doe any hurt with the masters knowledge where divers conditions are required 1. That the oxe used to push before the words are in the originall yesterday and yeâ— yesterday a definite time is put for an indefinite it is noâ— enough if he had once goared before but he must have one it twice at the least as R. Salomon Lyran. He must have beene knowne in former time to have beene used to push 2. This also must have beene notified and signified also to the owner for it may be that the oxe had used formerly to push and the owner knew it not Simler Or if he knew it he might denie it unlesse he had beene admonished by others to take care of his beast Tostat. quaest 28. 3. He or she must be free and not a servant whom the oxe used to push goareth to death for concerning the goaring of servants there followeth another law afterward vers 32. If the oxe goared a man or woman a sonne or daughter that is though they were never so little it was all one Lyran. Some thinke it is understood of the owners owne sonne and daughter Calvin Oleaster But the next law as touching the goaring of servants sheweth that it is rather meant of his neighbours sonne or daughter Hugo de S. Victor But it is rather understood in generall de quo viâ— capite libero of every free bodie great or small man or woman Iun. 4. In this case the owner being warned before of his oxe is to die for it because he did not keepe him in knowing him to be a harmefull beast Quia videtur illud quasi immittere aliorum cervicibus because he seemed of purpose to let him loose to doe mischiefe Simler QUEST LXVI When the owner might redeeme his left with money Vers. 30. IF there be set to him a summe of money 1. R. Salomon thinketh that in this case the next of kin to the partie slaine were to take a peece of money of the owner of the oxe and they
could not refuse but might be compelled to take it and so he taketh here si if for quia because Contra But the very letter of the law is against this exposition for it is expresly said The oxe shall be stoned and the owner shall die also But if the owner might at his libertie redeeme his life with money then he should never be put to death and so that clause of the law should be superfluous Tostat. quaest 29. 2. Neither yet is Tostatus opinion here to be received Quandoque posuit in electione cognatorum c. That the law doth put it in the choice of the kinsmen of the slaine when they would demand the owner to die and when they thought good to set him a summe of money and so hee maketh this a different case from that vers 22. where the Judges were to set the summe of money because it was no capitall offence but here he is to pay whatsoever is required by the adversarie part without any moderation or limitation of the Judges because the offence being capitall cannot be valued or esteemed by any certaine summe of money Tostat. quast 28. Contra. But this is not like that this was left to the choice of the adversaries for either they might set such an unreasonable summe which the owner was not able to pay or else might use partialitie that in the very like case some owner should die when another should escape with his life and so the law should not be equall and indifferent to all 3. Some thinke that it was in the Judges discretion to change the sentence of death into a pecuniary mulct concedit lâ—x quòd possit Iudex decernere c. The law alloweth the Judge to determine c. Cajetan Lippoman thinketh that the adversaries were to make the demand praevia tamen non iniqui Iudiciâ— moderatione c. yet by the moderation of an indifferent Judge going before But if it were altogether arbitrarie in the Judge when a man should die in this case when not to what end saith the law The owner shall die also In that case then there propounded he was certainly to die which sentence by the Judge could not be dispensed with 4. Therefore I thinke rather with Iunius that in this mitigation of the former sentence of death a divers case is put from the former that if the owner of the oxe non satis scivit did not sufficiently know it vel non satis cavit or did not take heed enough thinking he had sufficiently provided for his beast that in this case he might be excused Si simplick as vel incogitantiâ— hominem excusaâ—â—t if the mans simplicitie or forgetfulnesse did excuse him c. so that he were not found to be wilfully negligent and carelesse the Judge might set him at a summe of money Calvin QUEST LXVII What servants this law meaneth Hebrewes or strangers Vers. 32. IF the oxe goare a servant or maid 1. Some thinke this is generally meant of all servants among the Hebrewes where lesse respect is had unto servants than unto free men Vt cura libertatis major vigeret in populo Dei c. That there should be more care had of libertie among the people of God that they come not through their owne default into servitude and bondage Lippoman 2. But it is rather understood of such servants as were Gentiles and strangers and not Hebrewes as may appeare by the former lawes vers 20.26 which are onely referred unto that kinde of servants Iun. For in all kinde of percussions and wrongs offred to the bodie or life the Hebrew servants had the same privilege which free men had Againe Tostatus addeth this reason because if he were an Hebrew servant that was killed the money should not be given to his master but so much onely as his service remaining might be valued at the rest was to goe rather to his children or kindred as put the case that his service were esteemed at foure sicles yearly and there remained but one yeare of his service before the seventh yeare came then his master was to have but foure sicles of the thirtie sicles But because the Gentile servants were their masters perpetuall possession the whole summe which the servant was valued at that perished belonged unto them Tostat. quaest 3. QUEST LXVIII Why a certaine summe of money is set for all servants Vers. 32. HE shall give unto their masters thirtie sicles The common sicle weighed the fourth part of an ounce of silver so that thirtie sicles made seven ounces and an halfe that is so many dolleâ—â— seven crownes starling and an halfe Iun. which is about 37.s. 6.d. of our money Now although there was great difference in the price of servants for the men servants were more worth than the maids and the young and strong than the old and weake yet a certaine rate is set for these reasons 1. Some thinke this proportion and summe is named because out of Cham there issued thirtie generations Gen. 7. from whom servitude tooke beginning But this is but a figurative reason which rather belonged to the ceremoniall than to the politike lawes Tostat. quaest 29. 2. These reasons rather may bee yeelded 1. That whereas the summe for the death of a free man is arbitrarie vers 30. but the certaine quantitie is named for a servant slaine by a beast this was to shew a difference betweene servants and free men Cajetan 2. Quia caedes erat involuntaria c. Because this slaughter was involuntarie and the owners negligence onely is punished therefore one servant is not set at an higher rate than another Simler 3. And beside this moderate and indifferent price is taxed that the owner of the oxe and the master of the servant might as it were divide the losse betweene them that seeing it was done of negligence non multum gravaretur in solvendo Dominus bovis The owner of the oxe should not be burthened with over great payment Tostat. quaest 29. QUEST LXIX What kinde of wells this law meaneth where and by whom digged Vers. 33. WHen a man shall open a well or digge a pit c. 1. Here are two cases put when either one uncovereth a well digged alreadie or diggeth a new well and leaveth it uncovered then he is subject to this law Lyran. For if one made a well and left it covered and another commeth and uncovereth it though he made it not now he is in fault and not the other that made it quia causam immediatam tribuit malo because hee is the immediate cause of the evill or mischiefe that is done Tostat. qu. 30. 2. Rab. Salomon thinketh that if the master commanded another to make a well and leave it uncovered that in this case he is not to make good the losse but he that made it Contra. If he that made it were a servant who could not gainsay his masters commandement in this case the master was rather to be charged with the
Quali affectu Deus diem septimum prosequatur c. how the Lord is affected to the seventh day of rest that in remembrance thereof he also privileged the seventh yeare for the freedome of servants and the fiftieth yeare of Jubile Oleaster Whereby we are taught religiously to consecrate unto Gods honour the seventh day 2. Doct. Of Gods providence even in such things as seeme to fall out by chance Vers. 13. BVt God hath offred him into his hand Discamus non casuâ— aut fortunae istos occursus attribuere sed providentiae supremi Iudicis c. Let us learne saith Cajetane hereupon to attribute such occurrents not unto chance or fortune but unto the providence of the highest Judge Even these accidents which seeme to fall out by chance are ruled and governed by the providence of God as our blessed Saviour saith that even our haires are numbred and therefore nothing can happen unto us otherwise than as God disposeth 3. Doct. The fact is to be measured by the minde of the doer Vers. 13. IF a man have not laid wait Vides externa facta non esse judicanda juxta externam facti speciem c. You see that outward facts are not to bee judged according to the externall shew sed juxta internum facientis animum but according to the inward minde and purpose of the doer Lippom. As God saith to Abimelech when he had taken Sara Abrahams wife I know that thou didst this even with an upright minde Genes 21.6 4. Doct. In all wrongs there must be satisfaction and restitution made Vers. 19. HE shall beare his charges The injurie must be freely forgiven but yet there must be recompence and satisfaction made for the losse and hindrance so likewise vers 34. The owner shall make it good The law sheweth that restitution must be made for the hurt and damage made unto another Oleaster Therefore a man cannot looke for remission of his trespasse from God which he hath committed against his neighbour where he refuseth to make him amends it being in his power so did just Zachtus restore fourefold whatsoever he had wrongfully gotten Luk. 19.8 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Of the Anabaptists that denie the use of the sword unto the Civill Magistrate Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar that he may die This place doth authorise and warrant the lawfull power of the Civill Magistrate in the use of the sword against the error of the Anabaptists which would altogether deprive the Magistrate of it urging that place in the Gospell Matth. 5.39 I say unto you resist not evill But here our blessed Saviour repealeth not the law of Moses An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth but onely reverseth the corrupt exposition of the Pharisies which by this text would give warrant unto privat men to seeke their owne revenge whereas the law giveth this power onely unto the Civill Magistrate So the Apostle also saith that the Magistrate heareth not the sword for nought for he is the minister of God to take vengeance on him that doth evill Rom. 13.4 2. Confut. Against the Papists that would exempt Ecclesiasticall persons from the Civill power Vers. 14. THou shalt take him from mine Altar Even the Priest ministring at the Altar if he had committed wilfull murther might be taken from thence and put to death by the Magistrate as R. Salomon noteth wherein appeareth the soveraigne right and power which then the Civill Magistrate had over the Priests of the law which Tostatus granteth but he saith that herein there was great difference betweene the Priests of those times and of ours and thereupon he putteth this note in the margen Nota differentiam inter Sacerdotes veteris Testamenti nova legis note a difference betweene the Priests of the old Testament and of the new law Tostat. quaest 16. Contra. 1. But herein is no difference at all for the Ministers of the Gospell are no more exempted now from the Civill power than the Priests were then for the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher power Rom. 13.1 In this generall speech none are excepted yea our blessed Saviour who might have pleaded a greater privilege in this behalfe then any refused not to pay tribute for avoiding of offence Matth. 17.27 See more of this question Synops. Centur. 1. err 98. 3. Confut. Against the great abuse of Popish Sanctuaries FRom mine Altar This sheweth that the Temple and Altar as also the Cities of refuge were privileged places for some kinde of offenders though not for wilfull murtherers Here then somewhat would be inserted concerning the great abuse of Sanctuaries and privileged places in times past 1. Concerning the beginning and first occasion of them it is grounded upon and derived from the judiciall constitutions of Moses who by Gods appointment assigned certaine Cities of refuge for some offenders to flee unto but not for all malefactors from Moses the Gentiles seemed to borrow the like custome in giving immunitie and privilege to some places As in Athens Hercules nephewes builded the Temple of Mercie and obtained for the same this privilege that they which fled thither for succour should not by violence be taken thence In Rome Remus and Romulus betweene the tower and the Capitol appointed a place of refuge called intermontius betweene the hilles after that the Temples and Altars and then the images of the Emperours were privileged to give protection to those which fled thither for succour And from this example came the like immunities which were given afterward to the Churches of Christians which was afterward enlarged unto Church-yards and Monasteries As this reason is alleaged in the Imperiall constitutions of Theodos. and Valentin that because the Gentiles gave such honour to their Idoll temples c. Quantum oportet praesidii ad sacratissimas aras confugientibus praestare How much reliefe ought we to yeeld to those which flie to the most holy Altars The same reason is yeelded Concil Matiscin 2. can 8. Simundani Principes suis legibus censuerunt c. If worldly Princes have decreed by their lawes that whosoever did flee unto their images should be without hurt how much should he remaine undemnified qui suae gremium matris Ecclesia petierit c. which goeth to the bosome of his mother the Church 2. Now for the convenient and necessarie use of such Sanctuaries and privileged places these reasons are brought 1. That they which were innocent as in the case of involuntarie killing might rescue themselves from the rage of the pursuers 2. They which were oppressed by unequall Judges might finde shelter here till either the Judges wrath were appeased or a more indifferent Judge found 3. Such places served for the reliefe of servants that were cruelly handled of their masters 4. And for such as were endebted and were pursued of their cruell creditours and exactours 5. And in time of warre such places were of speciall use that
they which fled thither might be preserved from the sword As Allaricus when Rome was taken gave commandement that all they which fled to the Churches of S. Paul and S. Peter should have their lives Simler 3. But on the contrary thus it is objected against such Sanctuary places 1. That by this meanes the â—ourse of Justice is hindred when malefactors are sheltred and rescued from the Magistrate by the immunity and privilege of the place 2. Servants are encouraged to be contemptuous and disobedient to their masters finding succour elsewhere 3. And anthrifty and carelesse debtorâ— by such devises will seeke to defraud their creditours 4. And herein was a great abuse committed in former times of superstition that their Sanctuary places were open to all kinde of malefactors As thus it standeth deciâ—ed Aâ—reâ—aneus 1. c. 3. Homicidas adulteros fures sive quoscunque reâ—â— c. Murtherers adulterers theeves or any other trespassers as the Ecclesiasticall Canons decret and the Romanâ— Law appointeth it is not lawfull to draw out of the Church or the Bishops house but upon oath first given 〈…〉 poenarum gâ—nere sint securi that the parties so taken out should be secure from all kinde of punishment 4. Now then to moderate the excesse and abuse herein neither is it fit that all such Sanctuaries should be stripped of their privileges as Tibeâ—iâ—â— the Emperour did as Sâ—â—â—onius and Tacitus doe write But such places of Gods service are meet still to be had in reverence according to that Law of Arcadius Irruens in Templum vel Menistros capite punitur c. That hee which did assault the Church or the Ministers should be capitally punished Cod. lib. 1. tit 6. leg 10. Yet the privilege of such places would thus be moderated and limited 1. That they should not bee open to all offenders but onely to such as trespassed of ignorance and sinned unwittingly and such as were empoverished by casualty rather thâ—◠〈◊〉 owne default 2. That the number of such privileged places should be restrained as it is already in the refoâ—â—ed Churches seeing to all the 12. Tribes of Israel there were allowed but six Cities of 〈◊〉 3. He which was rescued in the Cities of refuge was but there a while till his cause was tried 〈…〉 guilty he was delivered up so it is fit that such as sought the Sanctuary should notwithstanding ansâ—er the Law As it was decreed by the Imperiall Lawes as Cod. 1. l. 1. tit 15. leg 5. Iudaei confugieuâ—es ad Eâ—â—â—â—sias suscipi non debent c. Jewes fleeing to the Churches ought not to be received unlesse first they pay their debts Ibid. leg 5. maneri possunt vel citari in Ecclesia c. they may be summoned and cited in the Church and being so cited they are bound to make answer c. 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Of the love which parents ought to beare toward their children Vers. 5. I Love my wife and my children c. Hence appeareth the great love which a man ought to beare toward his wife and children that he should endure much wrong yea and chuse rather to serve with them than to have his liberty and freedome without them Oleaster which condemneth the carelesnesse of such parents which preferre their owne case and pleasure before the safety of their children worse herein than the bruit beasts even then the savage and cruell Beare which rageth being robbed of her whelpes Prov. 17.12 2. Obser. Of the duty of children toward their parents Vers. 15. HE that smiteth his father or his mother vers 17. and he that curseth his father c. shall dye the death He that abused his parents in word or in deed that gave them but a tip or a reviling word was to be put to death which sheweth how much the Lord abhorreth stubbornnesse and disobedience to parents Little thought of by too many in our dayes and the rather because that continually in the Church there is not a beating of these points of Catechisme into childrens heads and hearts by carefull Ministers O that they would bee once drawne to doe this duty in their severall Churches soone should they find the fruit of it and the greatnesse of their sinne in so long neglecting it B. Babing 3. Observ. Masters not to be cruell toward their servants Vers. 20. IF a man smite his servant or his maid with a rod and he dye c. Upon this text Rabanus thus noteth Sicut disciplina opus est in eruditione subjectorum c. As discipline is needfull in the erudition of those that are in subjection Ita discretione opus est in exhibitione correpâ—â—onum c. So also discretion is needfull in the exhibiting of correction c. neither parents should provoke their children by too much rigour nor yet masters shew themselves cruell toward their servants as here the Law punisheth the immoderate severity of masters yea the Apostle would have masters put away threatning from their servants Ephes. 6.9 4. Observ. A wrong in deed must be recompenced in deed Vers. 26. HE shall let him goe free for his eye Chrysostome hereupon thus inferreth If thou hast chastised any beyond measure Injuriae peccatum beneficio est dissolvendum c. The sinne of wrong must be dissolved by a benefit Alioquin nisi quem factis laesisti factis placaveris siue causa eras 〈◊〉 Dominum Otherwise whom thou hast wronged in deed if thou doest not appease by thy deeds in vaine doest thou pray unto God c. Hom. 11. in Matth. As then the wrong is done so the amends or recompence must be made he that hath offended in word must by his words and confession acknowledge his fault but he which hath offred wrong in deed must also make some satisfaction for iâ— in deed as here the master for putting out his servants eye was to give him his liberty and freedome for it 5. Observ. Superiours are charged with the sinnes of inferiours committed by their negligence Vers. 29. IF the oxe were wâ—nt to push in time past c. As by this Law the owner of the oxe was to make good the hurt which was done by his oxe through his negligence because he kept him not so God imputeth the sinnes of the children to their fathers and of the subjects to the Magistrate si 〈◊〉 negligentia cessatum fuerit c. if through their negligence that is of the parents or governours the children or subjects faile in their duty as is set forth in the example of Holâ— 1 Sam. 2. who was punished for his remisnesse toward his children by which meanes he was made accessary to their sinne Lippoâ—â—â— CHAP. XXII 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter other politicke and civill Lawes are delivered which are of two sorts either concerning every ones private duty to vers 28. or the publike vers 27. to the end of the Chapter The private duties are of two sorts either touching prophane or sacred actions
all the smaller cattell as well sheepe and goats as lambâ— and 〈◊〉 2. And beside the facility easinesse and readinesse of theft other things are to be respected as the worth and price of the thing stollen and the boldnesse and impudency of the theefe 6. Wherefore these reasons rather may be yeelded 1. Quia frequâ—ntius furtâ— subtraâ—ebantur 〈◊〉 It might be that it was a more frequent and usuall thing to steale oxen among the Hebrewes than sheepes and therefore God would restraine the more usuall theft by the greater punishment Tostat. 2. In hâ—c dominium majus â—adacia major In this theft of oxen the losse was greater to the owner when his exe was stollen and the boldnesse of the theefe greater 〈…〉 esse Such a theefe as should steale oxen had need be bold and cunning because such a theft cannot so easily be hid as of sheepe 3. Ab. Ezra also giveth this reason because when a sheepe is stollen the owner loseth but his sheepe but in the other theft 〈…〉 he loseth his oxe and the labour of his oxe this reason also is approved by Oleaster 〈◊〉 Gallasâ—â—â— But Tostatus taketh this exception that iâ— the losse of the oxeus labour â—e accounted here in the restitution of five-fold why should it not be respected as well when the thing stollen is found with the theefe in which â—ase he was to pay but two-fold qu. 2. The answer here is ready because where the oxe is found though thâ—â—e â—e an intermission of his labour yet there is hope of restitution againe so is there not here the oxe being killed or sold. 7. Iosephus thinketh that this Law extendeth it selfe also to other cattell in the fields as to goats as well as sheepe though they be not here 〈◊〉 But concerning the asse or horse because they are not so easily stollen being kept in the house Tostatus thinketh that the Law of two-fold restitution tooke place as in the stealing of houshold stuffe and other moveable goods But it is more like recording to the rule observed before in other Lawes that by one kinde the rest are understood and these two the oxe and sheepe are given â—n â—ssistance as the most usuall and common beasts unto which all other great and small cattell should be reduced as afterward vers 4. direct mention is made of the asse QUEST III. Of the divers punishment of theft and whether it may be capitall NOw concerning the punishment of theft 1. The licentious liberty of the Lacedemonians is much to be misliked who punished not theft at all because they thought it was a meanes to traine and exercise their people in the practice of warre Gallas for it being a Morall law Thou shalt not steale and so grounded upon the Law of nature it ought not by any contrary custome to be discontinued 2. Neither is that Law of Solâ—â— which the Romans also inserted into their twelve Tables to be altogether approved aâ—â—â—ing opposite to Moses Law for they punished manifest theft with foure-fold when the theefe was taken in the manner whereas Moses setteth it but at two-fold and theft not manifest when the theefe is not found with the thing that was stollen they censured with restitution of two-fold whereas Moses chargeth such offence with foure-fold because such an one as hath sold or killed the stollen good hath added sinne to sinne having no purpose of restitution nor there being any possibility thereof Herein therefore the Law of Moses is more equall than the other 3. The Law also of Draco is too severe which punished theft with death the Scythians did so also but they had some reason for it because they had no houses or places of defence for their cattell so that if theft among them had not beene most severely punished nothing could have beene safe 4. Nor yet am I of their opinion that thinke that lex Mosis non pertinet ad politiam nostram the Law of Moses doth not at all belong to the policie of Common-wealths now Lippom. Non sumus alligati ad leges Iudaicas forenses That we are not bound how to the Jewes Civill lawes at all Osiand but that Magistrates may increase the externall punishment whether by death or otherwise as the circumstance of time quality and condition of the people require Contra. 1. As we are not strictly tied in every point to Moses Judicials so yet the equity thereof remaineth still which chiefly consisteth in this in the due measuring and weighing of the nature of sinnes which are thought to be worthy of death 2. Punishments externall may be increased which concerned either pecuniary mulcts or other bodily chastisement not touching the life as Moses punished theft with foure-fold but afterward the sinne increasing it was set at seven-fold Prov. 7.31 Pelarg. 3. But whereas mans life is only at Gods disposition this may be safely affirmed that no humane Law can take away the life of man for any offence without either generall or particular warrant and direction from Gods Law as is more at large before declared p. 4 5. 5. And yet I cannot consent to those that thinke no theft at all ought to be punished by death for even by Moses Law a violent theft as in breaking up of an house was judged worthy of death it was lawfull to kill such a theefe vers 2. Againe sacrilegious theft was likewise punished in the same manner as Iakob giveth sentence that they should not live that had stollen Labans gods Gen. 31.32 So Achan was put to death for stealing the excommunicate thing Iosh. 7. Theft committed of wantonnesse and without mercie David adjudgeth unto death 2 Sam. 12. vers 6. Chrysostome thinketh that David legem est praetergressus exceeded the Law in that he commandeth beside the restitution of foure-fold the man to be slaine and he calleth it supereffluentem justitiam overabounding justice But the Law of God did beare out David in it for he which did sinne presumptuously and with an high hand that is of malice and obstinacie was to dye for it Numb 15.30 Such was the sinne of the rich man whose case there is propounded which having many sheepe himselfe tooke away the poore mans sheepe by violence and had no pity Further he that did steale a man was to dye for it by the Law of Moses vers 16. So that it is evident even by Moses Judiciall lawes that some kinde of theft deserved death By the Romane Lawes also as is extant in their 12. Tables servants convicted of manifest theft were first beaten and then cast downe headlong from the rocke By the Imperiall lawes a theefe for the first offence was whipped then if he offended againe he lost his eares and the third time he was hanged in Anithent ut nulli Iudici c. for now such a theefe sinneth of obstinacie and malice and contempt against the Lawes and Magistrate and may by the Law of God be worthily put to death Simler So likewise such thefts whereby the
though it were moved to and fro yet was chiefly heaved up and thereof is called terumah an heave-offering QUEST XXXIII What is here understood by the heave-offering Vers. 28 FOr it is an heave-offering of the children of Israel 1. Some by Terumah which is a speciall name signifying an heave-offering doe understand in generall an oblation Vatarlus But the same word being in the next verse before used in a speciall signification for an heave-offering must bee also so taken here 2. Some doe take it in that speciall sense but then they restraine it only to the shoulder before spoken of which is called the shoulder of the heave-offering Osiander But it is evident in that a perpetuall Law is made for Aaron and his sonnes what part they should have of the peace-offerings and they had as well the shaken breast as the shoulder that was lifted up Levit. 27.34 that this clause must be understood of both those parts before spoken of the breast and the shoulder 3. Some by the heaving here understand only the dividing and separating of these parts which was to be made by the children of Israel So Oleaster and in the same sense the Latine Interpreter translateth primitivae sunt they are the first things that is the principall or best of the offerings of the children of Israel But the word terumah being before used in that speciall signification for an heave-offering should bee also so taken here 4. Therefore this terme terumah heave-offering is given both to the shaken breast and heaved shoulder of the more principall motion for these gifts were first of all by the Priest lifted up and presented before God in the hands of the Priest and in that respect were called an heave-offering Borrh. QUEST XXXIV Of the mysticall application of the shaking to and fro and of the breast and shoulder of the ram given unto the Priests FOr the mysticall application of these rites and ceremonies 1. In that part of the sacrifice was shaken to and fro on every side it signified Deum totius terra esse Dominum that God is Lord of the whole earth Oleaster and beside it betokened that Christi vera victimae merita beneficia c. that the merits and benefits of Christ the true sacrifice should by the preaching of the Gospell be spread abroad into all the world Borrh. But the Hebrewes exposition is fond who would have hereby signified that all men from all parts of the world should come to Jerusalem ibi optimâ aurâ fruituros there to have their health and to enjoy an wholesome aire Ex Oleastro For wee see that not by comming to Jerusalem but in departing from the earthly Jerusalem with the carnall rites thereof by preaching of the Gospell the Gentiles have received health and salvation of their soules which is more precious than the health of the body 2. In that part of the sacrifice was given unto the offerers to eat it sheweth that Christ did not only deliver himselfe unto death for us sed etiam in cibum dare c. but also giveth himselfe to be our meat nourishing us unto eternall life as he saith Ioh. 6.54 My flesh is meat indeed my bloud is drinke indeed c. Marbach 3. And in that the breast and shoulder are given unto the Priest it teacheth as Gregorie well saith Vt quod de sacrificio praecipitur sumere hoc de seipso discat authori immolare That what he is commanded to take of the sacrifice he should learne himselfe to offer unto God quod toto pectore oper◠c. that with all their heart and endevour they should watch upon their office Iun. Vt sint tanquam pectus humeri populi c. To be as the breast of the people to provide and take care for their soules and to bee as their shoulders to beare the burthen of their vocation Simler QUEST XXXV Of the consecrating of Aarons successour in his garments Vers. 29. ANd the holy garments c. 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth in the singular the holy garment but it is in the plurall bigdee garments for there was not one garment but many ten in all which were consecrated for the high Priest 2. The Priests which succeeded Aaron were not to use any other garments but those which Aaron was consecrated in as Eleazar put on Aaron priestly vesture when he was consecrated Priest in his fathers place Numb 20. Lyran. 3. And it is added shall be his sonnes after him whereby the use of these garments is not made generall to all the Priests but onely unto them which should succeed in the priesthood Cajetane 4. And this difference may be observed betweene the consecration of Aaron and his successour that Aaron in his consecration was both consecrated himselfe and his garments with him but his successour only was to be consecrated in those garments which needed not to be consecrated againe unlesse the old garments being old new were to be made in their place and then they were to be consecrated as Aarons priestly garments were at the first Tostat. quaest 13. 5. These garments the high Priest at the time of his consecration was to weare seven dayes together he was not afterward tied necessarily to weare them so long together but as his ministery and service required Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXXVI By whom the high Priests succeeding Aaron were consecrated Vers. 29. TO be consecrate therein 1. There were two high Priests consecrated extraordinarily first Aaron who received his consecration from Moses who was no Priest but only for the time executed that office in Aarons consecration secondly Eleazar was consecrated high Priest his father being yet living which was not afterward seene in any other succeeding high Priest for there could not be two high Priests together But Eleazar was consecrated his father yet living because the time of his death was certainly knowne as the Lord had shewed to Moses and immediatly after Eleazars consecration he died Numb 20 but this could not be knowne in any other high Priest 2. The rest of the high Priests which followed after Moses death were consecrated by the inferiour Priests Tistetus giveth an instance how the Pope at this day is consecrated by the Bishop of Hastia But the Gospell acknowledgeth no such high Priesthood and the Pope doth usurpe that place over other Churches therfore it is nothing to us how an usurper entreth A better instance may be given Act. 13.3 where certaine that were but Prophets and Doctors of the Church do yet lay their hands upon the Apostles Saul and Bernabas and so they did consecrate them to the worke whereunto they were called Therefore by the like example the inferiour Priests might consecrate the high Priest in the old Testament there being no other high Priest to do it QUEST XXXVII Whether Eleazar was consecrated after the manner here prescribed Vers. 30. THat sonne that shall be Priest in his stead c. Which is not understood onely
QUEST XL. Whether all these rites were of the necessitie of the consecration Vers. 35 THou shalt do thus unto Aaron and to his sonnes c. 1. Some are of opinion that all things here prescribed to bee observed and done were de necessitate consecrationis of the necessitie of the consecration and if any thing were omitted the consecration was voide R. Salomon Lyranus But this is not like that if any thing were neglected in the manner of eating in respect of the place persons or time that their consecration should thereby have been void as Levit 10.17 Aaron being in griefe for the sudden death of Nadab and Abihu forgot the sinne offering which they should have eaten and suffered it to be all burnt and this was the eighth day after their consecration Levit. 9.2 when as yet the anointing was fresh upon them and they did not yet come forth of the doores of the Tabernacle Levit. 10.7 And yet notwithstanding this negligence there was no nullitie of Aarons consecration Tostat. quâ—st 18. 2. Therefore Tostatus opinion is rather to be received that some things were of necessitie in the consecration as the washing anointing of the Priests the putting on of the priestly apparell the sprinkling of themselves and their garments some things were only de solennitate belonging to the solemnitie of the consecration as the seething and eating of it in the holy place and eating it the same day it was a sin to omit any of these but thereby their consecration was not made voide QUEST XLI Why the consecration of the Priests continued seven daies Vers. 35. SEven daies shalt thou consecrate them c. 1. This consecration of the Priests was to continue seven daies together that both the Priests hereby might bee confirmed in their vocation and be assured thereof that they were thereunto appointed of God and that the people also might thereby take better notice that they were set apart by the Lord for that holy function Osiander 2. And further hereby thus much was signified that as the Priests seven daies together were consecrated so we per totum vitae curriculum throughout the whole course of our life should be consecrated and addicted to Gods service Simler Marbach 3. Likewise we are hereby admonished Pontificem continuo proficere non posse repente summum fieri c. that the Priest must daily increase and go forward that he cannot be made perfect at once that many gifts and graces are required in him Lippoman 4. It also sheweth that as their consecration was not perfect before the seventh day so we cannot attaine to perfection in this life Osiander QUEST XLII Whether all the sacrifices of the first day were iterated seven daies together or the sacrifice for sin only Vers. 36. ANd shalt offer everie day a calfe 1. Lyranus thinketh that not onely a calfe for a sinne offering was sacrificed everie day but two rammes also so that seven calves were offered and fourteene rammes in these seven daies So also Simler Borrh. Lippom. Pellican But seeing there is no mention made but only of the sinne offering we have no warrant to imagine any other sacrifice to have been iterated but that as belonging to their consecration 2. Iosephus thinketh yet more that all things were iterated every day which were done upon the first day as the anointing of them and the sprinkling of the Priests themselves and their garments But this is not like that their consecration was iterated it was sufficient for them once to be consecrated and seeing the ramme of consecration was killed onely upon the first day with the bloud whereof they were sprinkled they were so sprinkled but upon the first day 3. Tostatus his opinion is that the calfe which was the sacrifice for sinne and the consecration ramme were offered everie day expresse mention is made of the one and the other is implied in these words seven daies shalt thou fill their hands that is put into their hands part of the peace offering to be shaken to fro before the Lord as is prescribed vers 24. Now the ramme of burnt offering needed not to be daily offered during these seven dayes because there were every day morning and evening a lambe offered for a burnt sacrifice Sic Tostat. But this opinion cannot stand 1. Seeing Moses is bid to take two rams chap. 24.2 it is like that either both of them were â—â—nued every day or none 2. And the filling of their hands signifieth nothing else but the consecrating of their Ministery as is before shewed whereof the hand was the organe and instrument it is not literally to be pressed to signifie the putting of the things offered into their hands 4. Therefore according to the words of the text of all the sacrifices appointed for the first day onely the calfe which is the sinne offering is prescribed to be iterated and the reason is because it was to cleanse and purifie the Altar Levit. 8.15 But only in this sacrifice were the hornes of the Altar touched with bloud and so sanctified which was not done in any of the other sacrifices QUEST XLIII To what end the sinne offering was offered every day of the seven Vers. 36. THou shalt offer every day a calfe c. for reconciliation or to make atonement 1. This reconciliation was not only made for the sinne of the Priests as thinketh Tostatus for the hornes of the Altar were laid on with this bloud whereby it was purified Levit. 8.15 2. Neither yet was this sinne offering prescribed only ad expiandum Altare to cleanse the Altar as thinketh Osiander Calvin For he had said before seven dayes shalt thou consecrate them that is the Priests and then it followeth and shalt offer every day c. so that this daily offering for the space of seven dayes belonged unto the consecration of the Priests 3. Therefore the end of this sacrifice for sinne was both to make atonement for Aaron and his sonnes as also to purifie and cleanse the Altar Iunius QUEST XLIV How the Altar was cleansed and why Vers. 36. ANd thou shalt cleanse the Altar 1. After the consecration of the Priests is set forth their Ministery and service both at the Altar of burnt offering and in the golden altar in the next Chapter Here three things are declared concerning the Altar of burnt offering 1. How it should bee purified 2. What should bee offered thereon 3. The profit and benefit that should come thereby the Lord would there come unto them and speake with them vers 42. and dwell among them vers 45. Lyranus 2. Two things are required to the purifying of the Altar it must first be cleansed not that it was polluted of it selfe but to shew that in respect of man omnia corruptione naturae profana ob peccatum c. that all things by the corruption of our nature are profane because of sinne Gallas Marbach As also it was not only cleansed but sanctified and set apart for holy uses that
the inferiour or common Priests garments which remained exutic pontificalibus the pontificall vestures or rayment being put off c. for so the word sarad signifieth to remaine to be left But this cannot bee so for in the third place the common garments for Aarons sonnes are mentioned also 3. Iunius thinketh that the curtaines and veiles of the Tabernacle are hereby signified as also those coverings wherein the Arke Altar Table with other things were folded up when the Tabernacle was removed But the curtaines and veiles are not here meant for they were made of foure colours blew silke purple scarlet fine twined linen chap. 26.1 these garments of Ministration were made only of three blew silke purple and scarlet chap. 39.1 â— Therefore the latter kind is onely here understood namely those coverings wherewith those holy things before spoken of were covered Vatabl. Borrh. Simler For such cloathes they had to wrappe them in Numb 4.6 7. The curtaines and veiles of the Tabernacle are before understood vers 7. under the name of the Tabernacle which is taken either generally for the coverings boords and pillars whereof the Tabernacle consisted and so it is called â—hel or more specially for the curtains only which is properly called miscan chap. 26.1 It is taken in the generall sense here Tostat. qu. 7. As likewise chap. 31.26 where it is said thou shalt anoint the Tabernacle QUEST X. The spirituall signification of the furnishing of Bezaleel and Aholiab with gifts BY the furnishing of Bezaleel and Aholiab with excellent gifts for the worke of the materiall Tabernacle 1. Strabus understandeth here the mysterie of the Trinitie Aholiab which he saith signifieth my protection betokeneth the Father Bezaleel interpreted in the shadow of God the holy Ghost and the word or commandement to make the Tabernacle the Sonne of God But this application is curious and dangerous to prefigure the blessed and immortall Trinitie by sinfull and mortall men 2. Yet Bezaleel of Iudah doth most properly prefigure the Messiah of the tribe of Iudah upon whom the Spirit of God was the Spirit of wisdome the Spirit of understanding c. and of knowledge Isai. 11.2 who should be the spirituall builder of the Church Borrh. Marbach 3. And by the inferiour workmen the Apostles are signified the Euangelists Pastors and Ministers who as inferiour workmen under the chiefe builder Christ Iesus doe edifie the Church So Saint Paul saith 1 Cor. 3.10 As a skilfull master builder I have laid the foundation Againe as here Bezaleel and Aholiab and many other were filled with the Spirit of wisdome for the worke of the outward Tabernacle so the Apostle saith Ephes. 4.11 He gave some to be Apostles some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastors and Teachers for the gathering together of the Saints for the worke of the Ministerie and for the edefication of the bodie of Christ And so as Hierom well saith Iudais perdentibus architectos omnis aedificandi gratia translata est ad Ecclesiam The Jewes having lost their workmen all the grace of building is transferred to the Church cap. 3. in Isaiam QUEST XI Why the precept concerning the Sabbath is here renued Vers. 13. NOtwithstanding keepe yee my Sabbaths Divers reasons may be yeelded why the Lord maketh rehearsall here of that precept of sanctifying the Sabbath 1. Quia segnes admodum tardi sumus ad cultum Dei Because we are slow and backward in Gods service Gallas 2. Because they were now appointed to begin the worke of the Tabernacle Ne crederem sibi 〈◊〉 esse die Sabbati aedificare Lest they might thinke that it was lawfull for them to build upon the Sabbath day the Lord in this place giveth them charge even in this busie and necessarie worke to keepe the Sabbath Lippoman Tostat. Lyrâ—n Pelarg. Iun. As likewise chap. 34.21 both in earing time and in harvest they are charged to keepe the Sabbath lest they might take themselves to be excused by the necessitie of these works Oleaster 3. Seeing they were not to keepe the ceremoniall lawes untill they came into the land of 〈…〉 omitted for the paschal lambe was but once sacrificed in the wildernes Cajetan 4. Beside the Lord hereby would teach them the right use of the Tabernacle which conâ—â—â—ed in their comming together there especially upon the Sabbaths to serve the Lord. And therefore these two are put together Levit. 23.30 Yee shall keep my Sabbaths and reverence my Sanctuarie and the Lord complaineth by his Prophet Ezech. 23.38 They have defiled my Sanctuarie and prophaned my Sabbaths Simler Pelarg. 5. This charge also renued ad supplet ionem omissâ—rum for the supplie of some things omitted because it was not expressed before what punishment hee should have that did violate the Sabbath which is declared here that hee should die the death and it was put in execution Numb 15. upon the man that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath Tostat. Lyran. QUEST XII Why it was more forbidden to labour in the building of the Sanctuarie upon the Sabbath than for the Priests to sacrifice AMong other reasons before alleaged why mention is here made of sanctifying the Sabbath this was one that the people might be here admonished to forbeare even from the workes of the Sanctuarie upon the Sabbath But then it will be thus objected seeing the Priests did violate and breake the Sabbath as one blessed Saviour saith Matth. 12.5 and were blamelesse as in killing the sacrifices and doing other things thereunto belonging why it was not as lawfull to labour in the building of the Sanctuarie also upon the Sabbath Hereunto answer may be made that there was great difference betweene the sacrifices which the Priests offered upon the Sabbath and other things belonging to their service and the other works of the Sanctuarie 1. The Lord commanded the one namely that sacrifices should be offered upon the Sabbath and that double to any other day for upon the other daies they sacrificed a lambe in the morning and another at night But upon the Sabbath two lambes were appointed for the morning sacrifice and two for night Numb 28.9 And the holy fire upon the Altar was commanded never to go out Levit. 6.13 this fire then they kept upon the Sabbath bringing and laying wood to preserve it These works they had the Lords word and warrant for But for the other they had not nay they were forbidden all kind of worke and labour upon the Sabbath saving those which the Lord himselfe excepted concerning the service of the Sabbath therefore these also in building and framing the things appertaining to the Tabernacle were likewise inhibited 2. The Priests are said to violate the Sabbath in their sacrifices and other Sabbath works but not properly because they did such things upon the Sabbath which if they had not been permitted yea commanded of themselves had tended to the violating of the Sabbath so they did breake it materialiter materially but not formaliter formally he breaketh the
to offer a man into ones hand when he is suddenly killed Exod. 21.13 Tostatus who also includeth the punishment of death inflicted by the Magistrate that when the transgression is apparent and found out by witnesses then the Magistrate putteth to death as the man was stoned that gathered stickes Numb 15. But if the profaner of the Sabbath escape the punishment of man the judgement of God shall overtake him Tostat. qu. 12. 6. But beside these kinds of death which shall bee inflicted here in that it is said He shall die the death the other phrase In being cut off from among his people sheweth that beside there remaineth for them everlasting punishment in the next world as the Lord threatneth to the prophane fire unquenchable Ezech. 20.47 QUEST XVI Why the seventh day is called Sabbath Sabbaton Vers. 15. IN the seventh day is the Sabbath of holy rest unto Iehovah 1. Whereas the words in the originall are sabbath sabbaton some Hebrewes by the first understand the determined time of the Sabbath from evening to evening but because they know not certainly where the rest of the Sabbath should begin and where it should end they have added an houre more at the beginning and an houre at the end of the Sabbath and this they say is called sabbaton which is a diminutive word which is formed by putting to on as of ish a man is derived ishon a little man But it is a weake conceit to imagine that their additions which are brought in only by their tradition should be grounded upon Scripture 2. Oleaster therefore as the Hebrewes make both these words sabbath and sabbaton proper names for the seventh day of rest so hee translateth them thus requies requiri it shall be a rest of rest making them both appellative and common names because there was a greater rest required on the Sabbath than upon any other day whereupon in the Gospell Ioh. 19.31 the Sabbath is called a great or high day it was greater than the Passeover But Oleaster is deceived in this collection 1. For that Sabbath is called an high day because the Passeover did fall out upon that Sabbath 2. And though it be true that the Sabbath was a greater day of rest than the Passeover wherein they were allowed to do such works as were about that which they should eat Exod. 12.16 which were not lawfull upon the Sabbath Exod. 16.23 yet the rest of the Sabbath was not greater than of all other festivals for the tenth day of the seventh 〈…〉 where the same word is used 3. Therefore it is better interpreted It is the Sabbath of rest to make the first a proper name and peculiar to the seventh day and the other common So reade Vatad Iun. Pagâ—in agreeing with the Lat. Chald. Septuag who thus interprete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbath a rest holy unto the Lord. 4. Now in that there is so often mention made of rest there is more intended than the outward rest of the bodie only as though it were sufficient to spend all the day in lying downe playing sleeping 〈…〉 die â—acra opera perficienda sunt but upon that holy and sacred day sacred exercises also should be performed Lippoman QUEST XVII How the observation of the Sabbath is perpetuall Vers. 16. THat they may observe the Sabbath 〈…〉 their generations for an everlasting covenant 1. The Jewes hereupon doe take occasion to raile upon Christ tanquam 〈◊〉 as a law breaker for abolishing the Sabbath and so they presse these words literally as though the Lord ordained that the Sabbath injoyned them should be perpetuall But beside that the word gholam or 〈◊〉 doth not alwaies signifie that which is indeed perpetuall and eternall but sometime onely a long time Calvine or 〈…〉 a time not limited or determined the words which are annexed Throughout your generations shew that the perpetuitie of this Sabbath is restrained to their posteritie and that as long as their policie and Common-wealth continued Osiander 2. Some doe understand it to bee eternall in this sense quia erat â—terna rei signum because it was signe of a thing eternall August qu. 139. that is of our everlasting rest in Christ aternum manet ipso effectu it remaineth eternall in effect Calvine that is in ceasing from the works of sin 3. Some thinke that it is called perpetuall with relation unto the time of ceremonies quamdiu vellet Deus observari statum 〈◊〉 imperfectum Iudaicum c. as long as God would have that imperfect state of the Jewes to be observed Tostat. 4. But as I refuse not these two last interpretations so I thinke that there is more signified that God would have perpetually observed a day of rest set apart for his service though not that precise day prescribed to the Jewes as long as the world endureth so that it is not only spiritualiter sed moraliter aternum spiritually but morally eternall Pelarg. and not onely appointed for a politike order to avoid confusion that the people should have some certaine day to meet together in to heare the Word and receive the Sacraments Gallas For if the keeping of the Lords day were only grounded upon policie then any other day might as well be set apart as this which is now observed But I say further with Pelargus Nobis servâ—vissime demandatam religionis exercenda curam That the care of the practice of religion upon the Lords day is straitly commanded us atque ad cam noâ— perpetuo â—lligari and that we are for ever tied unto it by the institution and practice of the Apostles Act. 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 who as Gallasius well concludeth did substitute the Lords day in remembrance of Christs resurrection in stead of the old Sabbath Spiritu Dei quo ipsi regebantur by the Spirit of God whereby they were guided And here Thomas giveth a good note why the Sabbath onely is here mentioned the other festivals of the Jewes being omitted wherein there was a commemoration of some particular benefits as in the pasch of their deliverance out of Egypt on the Sabbath pracipuum beneficium creationis the principall benefit of the creation was remembred which is generall to all people and not peculiar only to the Jewes beside therein was prefigured Quies mentis in Deâ— in prasenti per gratiam in futuro per gloriam The rest of the mind in God in the present by grace and in time to come by glorie Thomas Therefore seeing the seventh day of rest is a commemoration of the creation of the world and includeth a memoriall of Christs resurrection upon that day and is a symbole of our everlasting rest in heaven it ought to be perpetually observed QUEST XVIII Whether the world were made successively in time or in an instant Vers. 17. FOr in six daies the Lord made heaven and earth 1. Oleaster well concludeth from hence that God made the world and the things therein not all at once but successively
God could be made with mens hands 5. Therefore the plurall here is taken for the singular according to the Hebrew phrase Oleaster As so the Lord saith I have made thee Pharaohs god chap. 7.1 where the word is Elohim in the plurall and sometime a word of the plurall number is joyned with an adjective of the singular as Isai. 19.4 I will deliver the Egyptians into the hands adonim kasheh Dominorum duri of Lords hard where the adjective is put in the singular sometime the adjective that is joyned with it is put in the plurall also but the relative in the singular Iosh. 24.19 Elohim kadashim his he is holy gods that is an holy God so likewise sometime Elohim is put with a verbe singular as Gen. 1.1 Bara Elohim creavit Dii God created sometime with a verbe in the plurall as in this place asherjeeben which may goe before us So then Elohim gods in the plurall is here put for the singular Make us a god Tostat. qu. 4. QUEST VIII How the Israelites would have their god to be made to goe before them TO goe before us 1. It is evident by this wherefore they desired a visible god to be made not to that end that they might with greater libertie eat and drinke feast and play before the idoll which they could not doe before the Lord for the Lord did allow them to rejoyce before him in sober and seemely manner Nor yet because they bee like unto other nations to have some visible image to worship but they shew the end thereof that they might have some visible presence to goe before them Tostat. qu. 6. 2. And whereas Moses being absent they might have desired some other guide in his place to direct them they doe not so both because they know none could be given them like unto Moses and if such an one might be found he was subject to the like danger as they imagined Moses to be fallen into they desire rather some visible god to be given unto them Tostat. qu. 8. 3. Neither were they so senselesse to thinke that an idoll made of silver or gold which hath eyes and seeth not eares and heareth not could goe before them 4 And Tostatus conceit is too curious that because they had seene images in Egypt which had as they thought a certaine divine power in them speaking sometimes and making answer unto demands And among the rest the Egyptian God Apis which was like a pide bull did appeare once in a yeare unto them and used to goe before them unto Memphis and all the Egyptians followed after playing upon their harpâ— and other instruments he thinketh that the Israelites desired the like god to bee given them that they might have an image made endued with some divine power to goe before them But they never had seene any image in Egypt made with mens hands to stirre and move and walke before them The Egyptian god Apis was either a very pide pull indeed or the devill in that likenesse therefore they having seene no such president in Egypt it is not like they imagined any such thing 5. Wherefore these Elohim gods which they desire to be made were none other but images as Laban so calleth his little images gods Gen. 31. Gallas This then is the meaning that some image may be made them quae admoneret eos praesentiae divina which should admonish them of the divine presence Osiander And they say in effect but thus much Instituâ— nobis cultum c. Appoint us some kinde of worship that God may be reconciled unto us Vt pergat nos praecedere That he may go forward still before us as he hath begun Ferus So then their meaning is not that the idoll to be made should still goe before them but that God represented and reconciled thereby might goe on still with them QUEST IX Why the people came to Aaron rather than to Hur his fellow governour BUt it will bee here questioned why the people demand this rather of Aaron than of Hur who was joyned with him in the government chap. 24. 1. R. Salom. maketh this the reason because that the people had killed Hur because he resisted them and this he saith was the manner of his death al the people came and spet into his mouth and so choaked him But it is not like if Hur in so good a cause had given his life that it should have beene omitted Phinehes fact in slaying the adulterer and adulteresse is commended and honourable mention is made thereof but Hur had beene more worthie to have beene recorded for not killing but in suffering himselfe rather to bee killed in defence of Gods pure worship Tostat. qu. 3. 2. Neither yet is it to be supposed that Hur was dead for some mention then is like to have beene made of his death being a principall governour and of the peoples lamentation for him 3. Therefore although Hur may bee thought to have yeelded and consented to their motion as well as Aaron as not being a more holy man than hee yet because Aaron was the chiefe and more principall he onely is mentioned Tostat. qu. 3. QUEST X. Whether at this time the Israelites wanted the presence of the cloud FUrther whereas they desire gods to bee made to goe before them it will be here objected that they had the presence of the cloud which went before them and they therefore needed not to have had any other guide 1. Oleaster therefore thinketh that the cloud might at this time be taken out of their fight but this opinion is briefely confuted before quest 4. the cloud did not leave them till they came into the land of Canaan when the manna also ceased Iosh. 5. 2. Some make the blinde curiositie of the people the cause why they regarded not that ordinarie signe of Gods presence but requested some figure and representation of God answerable to their vanitie Calvin So also Chrysostom Adhuc iâ—spicis quod miraris oblitus es largitoris Thou seest daily that which thou wonderest at namely the manna which fell every morning and thou forgettest the giver 3. But this also may bee joyned to the former reason they had staied 40. dayes in a plat and the cloud stirred not they had continued as long in this place about mount Sinai even fortie dayes as they had beene in all the mansion places since their comming out of Egypt and so they might doubt that this cloud should be their direction no longer to goâ— before them into the promised land and therefore they desire another guide QUEST XI Why they say they knew not what was become of Moses Vers. 1. FOr of this Moses c. we know not what is become of him c. 1. R. Salom. thinketh they supposed he had beene dead and that Satan had made such an apparision in the aire as if they had indeed seene a coffin as if Moses had beene dead and his bodie put into it But if they
before and this were but one Simler But the contrary appeareth Deut. 9.20 4. Therefore these may be the causes why Moses prayeth againe 1. The Lord granted before that he would not destroy all the people at once sed 〈◊〉 ex inâ—ervallo vel per partes but whether he would doe it in continuance of time and as it wore by peecemeale hee knew not which he prayeth for here Lippom. 2. And there might be other sinnes as well as this for the which the Lord should be angry with them as Deut. 9.18 he saith he prayed and fasted because of all their sins Tostat. 3. And now he prayeth not only for the turning away or judgements but that the Lord would be againe fully reconciled unto his people and restore them to their former state and condition of favour Simler 4. And he prayeth not only for the pardoning of their temporall punishment but against everlasting death which sinne deserveth Osiander QUEST LXXVIII What booke it was out of the which Moses wisheth to be raced Vers. 32. IF thou wilt not race me out of the booke which thou hast written 1. By this booke R. Salomon understandeth the booke of the Law as Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law hee desireth if the Lord were purposed to destroy the people that his name should not be mentioned in the Law nor he taken to be the Law-giver for to what purpose should he be spoken of as a Law-giver unto that people which was not Contra. But this is not the meaning 1. Because the bookes of the Law were not yet written Moses therefore would not desire to be raced out of a booke which was not 2. Neither would Moses aske that of God which was in his owne power to doe now Moses did write the booke of the Law and he might have left out his owne name if he would 3. Againe Moses setteth against this great benefit the safety of the people the greatest losse which he could have but this had beene no such great losse unto Moses not to have his name remembred in any such written booke 4. Moses here useth a disjunctive speech Doâ— this or else race mee c. but if he meant the racing of his name out of the booke of the Law there had beene no disjunction at all for one had followed upon the other for if Israel had beene destroyed neither should Moses have written the booke of the Law which was only given unto Israel for it had beene in vaine to give Lawes unto a people that were not 5. Moses also speaketh of a booke which God had written now Moses writ the booke of the Law the ten Commandements only were written with Gods hand Tostat. quaest 41. 2. R. Abraham Francus who writeth upon Aben Ezra understandeth the racing out of this booke of the death of the body and he addeth further that there is quaedam rota coelestâ—â— a certaine celestiall wheele wherein are many starres which worke by their influence upon those iâ—â—eriour bodies and by the moving of this wheele death or life is caused so that thus he would interpret Moses speech Cause me by the motion of this wheele to dye But seeing the motion of this wheele which he imagineth is the naturall cause as he supposeth of life and death Moses could not dye naturally before his time came and if now he should have died it had beene not a naturall death but supernaturally caused by God therefore not by the motion of any such wheele Tostat. ibid. 3. Hierom also differeth not much from this former opinion in substance understanding Moses desire of death in this life he wisheth Perire in praesentiam non in perpetnum To perish for the present not for ever But whereas the Lord afterward answereth Moses Whosoever hath sinned will I put out of my booke vers 33. it followeth that they which sinne not that is without repentance are not put out of that booke but all as well the righteous as unrighteous the just and the sinners are subject to this temporall death therefore Moses speaketh not of that 4. Hierom hath beside another opinion for upon that place Psalm 69.28 Let them bee put out of the booke of life neither let them bee written with the righteous he inferreth that God hath two bookes viventium justorum of the living and of the righteous that was the booke of the living In quo ante adventum Dei Prophetae Patriarchae scripti sunt Wherein the Prophets and Patriarkes were written before the comming of God in the flesh the other wherein the faithfull are written whereof our blessed Saviour speaketh Rejoyce because your names are written in the booke of life and of the first Moses saith he speaketh in this place So some doe understand this booke in the same sense with Hierom of the booke of Gods Covenant which hee made with Israel out of the which the Gentiles were excluded of which mention is made Ezech. 13.9 where the Lord saith that the false Prophets shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel So Moses desireth here not to be counted of the family of Israel wherein all the Prophets and Patriarkes were written But if Israel had now perished the booke of Gods Covenant with Israel likewise should have beene no more remembred therefore it had beene superfluous for Moses to desire to be raced out of that booke And againe the booke of the living mentioned in the Psalme is the same with the booke of life spoken of Apocal. 3.5 I will not put his name out of the booke of life In which booke of life not only the Prophets and Patriarkes before Christ but all the faithfull before and since are written 5. Cajetane understandeth it De libro principatuâ— in hoc mundo Of the booke of principality and preeminence in the world for it is decreed with God as in a booke Quod isto vel illi principentur in hac vita That such or such shall beare rule in this life And so Moses desireth to lose his principality and government which the Lord promised him that hee would make of him a great nation c. But whereas they which sinned only are taken out of this booke of life and yet many wicked and evill men are governours in the world it cannot be meant of any such booke or decree of principalitie or government 6. Oleaster by this booke thinketh to be understood the booke of the acts and doings of the righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 But there are many righteous men whose names and acts were not written in that booke which is now thought also to be lost therefore it had beene no great matter for Moses to wish to be put out of that booke 7. Burgensis maketh foure bookes of God 1. One is the booke of life wherein only are written the names of the Elect that are ordained unto life as when souldiers are written in the muster booke which are pressed
this distinction one way they are said simply to be written In quantum praedestinati sunt in noticia Divina as they are ordained to salvation in the knowledge and prescience of God and they that are thus written can never bee blotted out another way they are scripti secundum quid written after a sort not according to the divine prescience or predestination Sed secundum dispositionem in eis actu existentem secundum praesentem justitiam But according to their disposition which is in act in them and according to their present justice and thus are they said to be blotted out not in respect of Gods knowledge as though any thing can fall out against his prescience but in respect of their change from grace into sinne 2. Thomas also to the same purpose some are said to bee blotted out Non secundum rei veritatem sed secundum hominum opinionem Not according to the truth of the thing but in the opinion of men for it is usuall in Scripture ut aliquid dicatur fieri quando innotescit that a thing should be said to be done when it appeareth So some are said to be written in the booke of life quia homines ibi opinantur scriptos propter presentem justitiam because men thinke they are there written in respect of their present justice Then some are there written ex pradestinatione by predestination which can never bee blotted out Some ex gratia in respect of their present grace which they may fall from and so be blotted out And againe in another place he expresseth the same thing in other termes Some are predestinate of God Insâ— ut simpliciter habituri vitam aeternam Simply to have life eternall in themselves and these are so written in the booke of life as they can never be blotted out And some are so written Vt habeant vitam aeternam non in se sed in sua causa To have life eternall not in themselves but in respect of their cause and present state of Justice which when they fall from they are said to be blotted out 3. So before them both Augustine We must not so take it brethren Quod quenquam Deus scribat in librâ— vitae deleat illum That God writeth any in the booke of life and blotteth him out for if a mortall man said that I have written I have written shall we thinke that God writeth and blotteth out Praescius est Deus praedestinavit omnes ante constitutionem mundi regnaturos cum filio God foreseeth all things and he did predestinate all before the making of the world that should reigne with his sonne c. Therefore this is said Secundum spem ipsorum qui ibi se scriptos putabant That some are written which are said to be blotted out in their owne opinion because they thought they were there written so that where it is said let them be blotted out of the booke of life the meaning is ut ipsos constet non illos ibi esse that it may appeare unto them that they are not there To this purpose Augustine as he is alleaged both by Simlerus and Borrhaius 4. Tostatus followeth the same distinction that some are written in the booke of life secundum firmam praedestinationem according to Gods sure predestination some only secundum praesentem justitiam in respect of their present justice these may bee blotted out and not the other but he addeth further that so likewise in the booke of Gods prescience wherein onely they are written whose end is damnation some are written there secundum firmam Dei praescientiam according to Gods firme prescience others secundum praesentem injustitiam according to their present injustice These may be blotted out and not the other And this writing of them in one booke according to their present justice in the other according to their present injustice he calleth the writing foris without the booke the other writing according to Gods predestination and prescience he saith is intus within the booke Then out of these positions he inferreth certaine conclusions 1. That it is possible for one to be written in both these bookes the booke of life and the booke of death together in the one according to Gods predestination or prescience in the other according to their present justice or injustice As he which is predestinate unto life may according to his present state of injustice be written in the booke of death foris without as Paul while he was yet a persecutor and one may be in Gods prescience written in the booke of death and yet according to his present state of grace he may be written in the booke of life as Iudas while yet he continued in Christs obedience and preached the Gospell 2. Yet it is possible for one to be written twice in the same booke both in regard of Gods prescience and his owne state and condition as Moses was thus written in the booke of life and Iudas when he betrayed Christ in the booke of death 3. They which are written in the booke of life according to predestination may be blotted out thence according to their present state and condition as David when he sinned and so in the other booke likewise as Saul while he was yet a vertuous King he was written in the booke of rejection in Gods prescience but blotted out in regard of his present justice 4. But he that is written in the booke of life according unto predestination cannot be written in the booke of death according to Gods prescience and so on the other side because one and the same cannot be foreseene of God both to salvation and condemnation 5. And they which are written according to their present justice in the booke of life cannot at the same time be written in the booke of death according to their present injustice because one cannot at the same time be counted righteous and wicked before God Tostat. qu. 43. But these exceptions may worthily be taken unto Tostatus conclusions 1. Because he maketh a booke of death and speaketh of putting in and blotting out of that booke whereas the Scripture acknowledgeth only a booke of life not any of death for not to be written in the booke of life though they bee not written in any other blacke booke is sufficient unto everlasting perdition 2. He calleth the booke of death the booke of Gods prescience only as though God were not a Judge also in condemning the vessels of wrath into hell and ordaining them justly thereunto as he is in the electing the vessels of honour to salvation 3. It is an errour that God writeth any in either of those bookes on the backside in respect of their present state or condition of justice or injustice for Gods writing there is unchangeable they are there said to be written in regard of their present state secundum spem ipsorum in their owne hope as Augustine or secundum opinionem hominâ—m according to the opinion of
volunt supplicium infligore c. The enemies which intend to punish doe not onely say nothing of it but go about it most secretly lest they which are to be punished for it knowing of it should escape but the Lord contrariwise praedicit differt territ when hee intendeth to punish doth give warning of it defferreth it terrifieth c. ut quae minatur non inferat that what he threatneth be not brought upon them and so the Lord doth heere he threatneth to move them to repentance 5. But these words are rather spoken enuntiativè declarative by way of declaration as Cajetane Declaratio est ejus quod dixerat It is a declaration of that which hee had said before vers 3. Lest I consume thee in the way And the meaning is this si tecum ascenderem contingere posset c. if I should go up with thee it might come to passe that I should destroy thee Osiander So also Iunius It is therefore a declaration or repetition of the former reason why the Lord would not go up with them lest being provoked by their sinnes hee might consume them 6. And the Lord to this end so often telleth them that he will not go with them that they might more earnestly sue unto God for his comfortable presence still for the Lord purposed not to withdraw his presence from them as afterward he saith unto Moses My presence shall go with thee Like unto this Cyrillus maketh that answer of our Saviour in the Gospell who being asked of his brethren if hee would go up to the feast said first hee would not go up and yet afterward went up Propter incredulitatem Iudaorum iturum se negavit tamen propter pancos sanctos ascendit c. He denied to go up because of the unbeliefe of the Jewes but he went up for their sakes which beleeved c. So here though the Lord refused in respect of the idolatrous and rebellious people to go up with them yet for Moses sake he granteth his presence QUEST IX Whether the people put off their ornaments twice Vers. 5. NOw put thy costly rayment from thee 1. Lyranus thinketh that this was another putting off than that before spoken of that the people first of themselves put off their costly rayment and then when the Lord commanded them they also put off their golden crownes But 1. It is a meere imagination that they had any such crownes 2. If they had any such it is like when they put on their mourning apparell that they would also have laid by their coronets which were not seemely for mourners to weare Tostatus qu. 7. 2. Cajetane thinketh that first ornatum personalem spontanei deposuerunt they did lay downe of their owne accord their personall ornaments but afterward they are commanded to take away also the ornament of the place Locus superior mons Dei ornatus erat à filijs Israel The higher place which was the mountaine of God the Israelites had decked and adorned because the Law there was given which the Lord commandeth to be taken away because of the sinne of the people there committed But seeing they were straitly charged not to come neere the hill upon paine of death chap. 19.13 it is not like they did decke and adorne the hill and they are bid to put their ornaments from them not from the place 3. Osiander thus interpreteth Depone totum ornamentum tuum Lay aside all thy ornaments and put on sackcloath He thinketh they had put off some before and now are bid to put off the rest but the same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gnathah used in both places sheweth that the text speaketh of the same ornaments 4. The Interlinearie glosse by their ornaments here understandeth manifestam Dei praesentiam the manifest presence and apparition of God But it was not in the peoples power to lay aside that ornament 5. Some understand by this ornament faith qua populum illum carnisse liquet which it is evident that people wanted Ex Lippom. But God would not bid them lay aside any such ornament 6. Lippoman expoundeth it thus Videri potest hoc quadam praecedentis depositionis approbatio This may seeme to bee a certaine approbation of their former laying aside of their garments But it is a commandement that they should doe it therefore not an approbation of a thing done 7. Tostatus thinketh that this laying aside of their garments was done all at once but hee saith that it was not now done but after Moses second returne from the mountaine which opinion is confuted before qu. 7. 8. Therefore Gallasius better resolveth in reading here in the preterpluperfect tense for the Lord had said So also Iun. Genevens And thinketh this to be given as a reason why the people put off their ornaments quia jussu Dei factum because it was done at the Lords commandement Neque enim illi excogitarunt hoc opus poenitentia For the people did not devise this worke of repentance of themselves Simler So also Calvine saith it is an explication of the former Non fuisse ornatos quia id vetuerat Deus That the people had not their ornaments because God forbad them The same also is the opinion of Oleaster that God spake these words before when he said I will not go up with thee vers 3. QUEST X. In what sense the Lord saith That I may know Vers. 5. THat I may know what to doe unto thee 1. The Interlinear Gloss. giveth this sense Vt sciam id est scire faciam c. That I may know that is make thee know what a great wickednesse thou hast committed whereby thou art deprived of my presence Nam ab illo die non ita manifeste apparuit illi populo For from that day he did not so manifestly appeare unto that people c. But beside that the Lord still went before them after this by his visible presence he speaketh here not as having determined what to doe but as yet one deliberating with himselfe 2. Rupertus thus interpreteth That I may know c. Nullam enim habet materiam struendae misericordia c. Because the Lord should have no matter for his mercie to worke upon if there did not go before some shew of repentance c. But the Lord in this speech determineth nothing he keepeth them in suspense 3. Tostatus turneth it the other way that seeing the objection and humiliation Sciam quid debeam poenae tibi infligere c. I may know what part of the punishment I should inflict qu. 7. But as it is said before suspensos relinquere videtur hee seemeth yet to leave them in suspense 4. Lyranus therefore resolveth upon this sense Non quod Deus aliquid de novo cognoscat Not that God should know any thing more than he did but that by the change of the people it might be made manifest what it was fit for the Lord to doe unto that people So also Ferus
maketh not innocent but in making innocent he will not make innocent 5. Burgensis thus understandeth it that the Lord holdeth not the innocent in the remission of their sinne to be innocent in respect of some punishmet which may remaine But daily experience sheweth the contrary that God multa peccata impunita praeâ—erit doth leave many sinnes unpunished at all neither doth the punishment remaine the sinne being once pardoned Calvin 6. Oleaster giveth this sense Vere innocentem ita percutiet c. Sometime hee will smite or correct the innocent as though he were not innocent as he sheweth by the example of Iob lest God might seeme to be unjust in afflicting the righteous But if God should be said in the same action and at the same time to absolve and not to absolve it would include a contradiction 7. Wherefore the best interpretation is that which the Septuagint follow 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the guilty he will not purifie so that here two Hebraismes must be observed first the word is iterated and repeated In absolving I will not absolve to shew the certainty of the thing that is nullo modo absolvam I will by no meanes absolve Iun. Secondly I will not absolve that is punio I doe or will punish Vatabl. And further here must be supplied the word sontem the guiltie I will not absolve Iun. Calvin Gallas Pelarg. As the like place is found Ierem. 46.28 venakeh lo enakeh in setting thee free I will not set thee free that is will not hold thee altogether innocent but will punish thee So also Ierem. 25.19 In being innocent should yee be innocent where the same word is doubled the meaning is they should not be altogether innocent Calvin 8. Calvin also propoundeth another sense because nikkah sometime signifieth to cut off it may be thus interpreted succidendo non succidam in cutting off I will not cut off and so it may be a reason of the former sentence that God will forgive sinnes and not cut off the sinners altogether But he preferreth rather the former interpretation for the other sentence ending with a perfect distinction sheweth that the sentence following hath no dependance of it QUEST XII What the Lord visiteth for in the posteritie of the wicked Vers. 7. VIsiting the iniquity c. 1. Lest God having hitherto proclaimed his mercie might be thought not to regard the sinnes of men the Lord now addeth that he is also a visiter and punisher of sinne upon the wicked and their posterity Ferus 2. And by sinne here is understood neither the act of sinne which cannot be transmitted over unto other but being a transitory thing resteth in the doer nor the fault which only goeth with the act nor the blot which is only in the soule of the sinner and offender nor yet the guilt for if the children were guilty of their fathers sinnes then they should for the same be everlastingly punished therefore by sinne is meant the punishment of sinne which is extended to their posterity Tostat. qu. 8. 3. And God usually punisheth the fathers but unto the fourth generation as the Amorites and Amalekites were punished after 400. yeeres which expired in the fourth generation Gen. 15. vers 13 16. Oleaster QUEST XIII How the children are punished for their fathers sinnes Vers. 7. THe iniquity of the fathers upon the children c. In deciding of this question how the sonnes are punished for their fathers sinnes it must be considered whether the punishment bee inflicted by man or by God 1. If by man the punishment bee imposed it is either in the losse onely of temporall things or in death the children may justly be deprived of temporall things as of possessions privileges honours for the transgression of their parents As by humane Lawes treason against the Prince or Common-wealth is punished with death in the offenders and losse of honours and goods in their posterity But the punishment of death cannot be inflicted upon the children for their fathers offences as a rule is given in Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers 2. If the punishment be inflicted by the Lord it is either eternall or temporall first eternall punishment is laid upon none but upon the party that sinneth The same soule that sinneth shall dye Eâ—ech 18.4 If it be temporall it consisteth either in the losse of some temporall benefit or of life if the first not onely little ones and infants as the Hebrewes thinke shall suffer for their fathers sinnes but even they which are of yeeres as the Israelites did beare the iniquity of their fathers forty yeeres in the desart and the Jewes great and small were afflicted in the Babylonian captivity but where the punishment of temporall death is decreed by the Lord there onely the infants are punished for their fathers sinnes as the children of the rebellious Cora Dathan and Abiram were swallowed up with their fathers the greater sort also perished in that destruction but then they were such as consented thereunto Tostat. quâ—st 9. So also Achan was stoned with his sonnes and daughters for the sacrilege by him commited where Tostatus thinketh that they were little ones because the greater sort were not privy to his sinne seeing he had hid the stollen things in the ground But it is more like that they were such as might give consent unto the sinne and conceale it and that the things were not hid without their privity Iun. Or for the greater detestation of that fact and the example of others this exemplary punishment might be inflicted upon them Osiander But here two exceptions may be taken unto Tostatus conclusions 1. That he maketh infants liable to those sinnes of the fathers which the Lord saith he will here visit to the third and fourth generation whereas onely those children which continue like haters of God as their fathers were and imitate their impiety are included in this commination as appeareth by that clause inserted in the second Commandement of them that hate me Againe when infants are cut off by death their owne originall sinne is sufficient cause thereof which bringeth death upon them and so infants are taken away not onely to the fourth generation but in other succeeding ages further off 2. He restraineth this generall speech visiting the iniquity of the fathers onely unto temporall punishments beside death whereas the Lords judgements are not to be limited to this or that kinde but sometime by corporall death sometime by other temporall punishments hee doth visit the iniquity of the wicked fathers in their evill posteritie QUEST XIV Why the posteritie of the wicked are punished for their fathers sinnes VNto the third and fourth generation There are foure answers usually made to shew the equity of this that the posterity of the wicked should be punished for their fathers sinnes 1. Because God that gave life may againe without any injustice require it againe Nulli
Then there is declared how forward they were in offering both what was brought not only gold and silver and precious stones but other things of lesse price as rams skins badgers skins and by whom they were offered by the men women and Princes to vers 30. 3. Then the institution of the workmen is expressed 1. Who they were 2. What gifts they were indued with 3. To what end not only to worke themselves but to teach others vers 35. 2. The divers readings Vers. 22. Hookes or buttons earings rings and studded girdles I. better than rings and chaines B. or rings and bracelets G.L.S.C. or rings and aprons A. the ornaments of the nether parts it is not like they offered such the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chumaz which Iunius interpreteth cingula◠bullatas studded girdles here and Numb 31.50 Vers. 34. Both him and Aholiab c. that is God hath called both him and Aholiab Iun. So also the vulgar Latine putteth it in the accusative likewise A.P. better than in the nominative as V.B.G.S.C. For so it hath no grammaticall construction with the precedent sentence 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Why the precept of keeping the Sabbath is so often inculcate Vers. 1. IT shall be unto you the holy Sabbath of rest unto the Lord. 1. Cajetane thinketh that this is the reason why the precept of the Sabbath is here iterated because Moses propositurus ceremonialia being to propound ceremoniall Lawes beginneth with the chiefest of them which is concerning the Sabbath But the preamble vers 1. These are the words which the Lord hath commanded that ye should doe them sheweth that Moses speaketh not only of ceremoniall but morall duties also which were to be done and performed by them Marbach 2. But there are two reasons of this repetition one lest they might thinke that they might intermit the rest of the Sabbath because of the workes of the Sanctuary for the which reason this precept was urged before chap. 31. Iun. Marbach Pelarg. 3. The other reason is because this precept religionis caput totum Dei cultum continet c. doth in a manner containe the head of religion and the whole worship of God because upon the Sabbath they were taught their whole duty toward God therefore the neglect thereof would tend to the ruine and decay of all religion Gallas Simler 4. And this precept is so often inculcate to admonish us Primo omnium Dei regnum quarendum esse That first of all we must seeke the kingdome of God Osiander QUEST II. Whether it were simply forbidden the Israelites to kindle fire upon the Sabbath Vers. 3. YOu shall kindle no fire thorowout all your habitations c. 1. The Hebrewes were so strict in keeping the very letter of this Law that they thought it not lawfull to strike fire out of a stone or iron nor to light a candle but for the sicke nor to put out a fire and if they made a fire to warme them by they were not to kindle it with bellowes but with reed Oleaster And therefore the Jewes used to hire Christians to make their fires upon the Lords day Lippomnn But this their superstition was convinced by their owne practice in the Tabernacle where the Priests did keepe fire on the Lords day upon the Altar which was never to goe out 2. Some of our owne Writers thinke that by this they were forbidden to make a fire ad calefaciendum to warme them by And therefore the man that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath day was stoned to death Gallas But seeing the Sabbath was made for man that is for his good not for his hurt there was no doubt but in extremity of cold for the preservation of their health it was lawfull for them to warme them at the fire the man was put to death for gathering stickes not for kindling of a fire and he did it with an high hand that is of an obstinate minde as may be gathered Numb 15.30 3. Some thinke that only such kindling of fire is forbidden ex quo lucrum sperari posset whereof they made gaine as in furnaces and forges Vatab. But the words are generall that not only in their shops and forges but thorowout all their habitations they should not kindle a fire 4. Therefore I preferre rather Cajetanes opinion that it is not simply forbidden to kindle a fire but relativè ad coquendum with relation to the seething and dressing of their meat which asked much businesse and great preparation they were to prepare their meat the day before Exod. 16.23 which shewed a difference betweene the Sabbath and other festivall dayes wherein it was lawfull for them to dresse their meat as in the Pasch chap. 12.16 5. R. Abraham Aben Ezra did hold it lawfull to kindle a fire upon the Lords day to warme them by though not to dresse their meat whereupon the other Rabbines would have pronounced him an Heretike and they writ a booke against him under the name of the Sabbath as though the Sabbath it selfe had spoken against him But as herein Aben Ezra did hit upon the meaning of the Law yet he was deceived in another point that though it were not lawfull to kindle a fire upon the Sabbath from the rising of the Sunne to the setting thereof yet they might doe it in the night before But they used in the account of their feasts to begin from the evening before as they began the feast of unleavened bread upon the 14. day at even Exod. 16.18 They observed then their feasts according to the naturall day which contained both the day and the night not after the artificiall from Sunne to Sunne Tostat. qu. 1. 6. This precept of not kindling a fire upon the Sabbath must be understood extra casum necessitatis beside the case of necessity Marbach For otherwise to kindle a fire to dresse meat rather than to starve and to comfort the sicke was not forbidden 7. It is added thorowout their habitations that is their private dwellings for otherwise in the Tabernacle they did kindle a fire and doe other bodily workes which concerned the service of God Tostat. quaest 1. QUEST III. Why the Lord would have his Temple built sumptuously Vers. 5. LEt him bring an offering to the Lord gold silver c. 1. Moses to shew his faithfulnesse in executing Gods commandement neither adding thereto nor taking any thing therefrom repeateth in these chapters this and the rest following almost the same things verbatim which were prescribed before to be made concerning the Tabernacle chap. 25 26 27 28. Gallas And therefore the Reader is to be referred to the large treatises and questions there handled if he desireth in any thing to be satisfied 2. The people then had both silver and gold and other jewels which they brought out of Egypt with them neither had they bestowed all upon the golden Calfe 3. It so seemed good unto God that his Tabernacle should be builded sumptuously
publike peace and safety is violated as in the Campe among souldiers and robbing by the high way where ones life is put in danger All these kindes being more than simple thefts may receive the sentence of death by Moses Law and Magistrates herein may with a good conscience execute the rigour of the Law upon such violent outragious impudent wanton and incorrigible thefts But they are wisely to consider every circumstance and the occasion that draweth one to steale whether he doe it of necessity to releeve his hungry soule or of an evill custome and obstinate minde to maintaine his lewd and unthrifty life In the first case it seemeth to be too sharpe to take away ones life unlesse he be such an one as will take no warning but continueth hardened in his sinne And so for simple and single theft only except it be in stealing of men unlesse it be aggravated by other circumstances concurring 〈◊〉 violence rapine obstinacie custome in sinne and such like neither the Law of Moses prescribeth punishment of death nor yet is it practised by our Lawes which in such cases intend favour by allowing the privilege of the booke See before p. 6. QUEST IV. Why the theefe breaking up might be killed Vers. 6. IF a theefe be found breaking up c. 1. R. Salomon thinketh that this Law which alloweth the theefe found breaking up an house to be slaine is understood not only of theeves that breake in by night but by day also and that clause which followeth When the Sunne riseth upon him they interpret metaphorically that if it be evident and manifest as the light that the theefe came not only to steale but to kill that whether by day or night he may be killed So also the Chalde Interpreter seemeth to follow the same sense Si oculus testium vidit eum If the eye of witnesses saw him that is if it were evident that he came not only as a theefe but to assault Contra. Though this be true that a man might defend himselfe even by day against him that assaulted his life yet this is not the meaning here the words of the Law are literally not metaphorically to be understood 2. The reason of this difference betweene a night theefe and a day theefe is because in the night breaking in it is not knowne whether he came to steale only or to murther but in the day it may easily appeare by his armour and weapons Tostat. Simler Beside in the day he may call for helpe against the theefe which cannot be so well done in the night when he is left without all other remedy but his owne defence Galas Marbach And in the day he may have witnesses of his theft and so convent him before the Magistrate Lippom. 3. The Romane Lawes allow not onely to kill a night theefe but a day theefe also si se tel◠defenderit if he defend himselfe by a weapon Moses Law much disagreeth not for though he that commeth only as a theefe in the day time is not to be killed but to make restitution only yet if he come with weapons as having a murtherers intent now he may be repelled by force even as a night theefe may not now as a theefe but as one which commeth to assault and murther Iunius QUEST V. How it is made lawfull for a private man to kill a theefe Vers. 2. ANd be smitten that he dye no bloud shall be imputed 1. Cajetanus here observeth that this Law simply alloweth not to kill the theefe but if a man smite him in his owne defence not intending to kill him that in this case he shall be free Percussio fuit intenta mors autem per accidens sequnta c. He intended only to smite him but death followed accidentally upon such smiting so also Simler Non probat ut animo occidendi feriatur This Law alloweth not that he should be stricken with a minde to kill him sed indulget affectui c. but it beareth with a mans sudden passion if in defence of himselfe it so fall out that he be killed 2. But this Law seemeth not only to permit one to smite a night theefe but directly to kill him also so it be not with a desire to kill him where he may otherwise escape but to defend him and his from violence which he cannot doe unlesse the theefe be killed Borrh. 3. For seeing both the Law of nature and other Civill lawes doe allow a man to defend himselfe now when the Lawes doe arme a man they seeme publicam personam imponere to impose upon him a publike person so that now he smiteth not as a private man but by authority of the Law and in this case he is tanquam minister vindex Dei as the minister and revenger of God so that he doe it not of a lust and raging desire to be revenged but intending to use a lawfull defence in the safegard of his owne life Gallas And the case is here all one as if a man being set upon by the high way should kill him that maketh the assault upon him Marbach QUEST VI. After what manner the theefe was to be sold. Vers. 3. HE should be sold for his theft c. 1. So was also the Law among the Romans that the debter should be given up in bonds unto his creditor Whereupon Cato was wont to say Fures privates in nexu compedibus vivere publicos in aur◠purpura c. That private theeves lived in chaines and fetters but the publike in gold and purple c. But this custome because it seemed very hard was abrogated by the Law of Arcadius and Honorius Gallas 2. But here it must be considered whether the theefe were an Hebrew or a stranger if an Hebrew how great soever the debt were for his theft he could be but sold over for six yeeres for all Hebrew servants were to goe out free the seventh And as the theft was valued so should he serve more yeeres or fewer But if he were a stranger he might be sold over to serve all his life if the value of the theft were great if it were but small he was but to be sold to serve so many yeeres as might suffice to recompence the theft Tostat. QUEST VII Why the theefe is only punished double with whom the thing stollen is found Vers. 4. HE shall restore double 1. That is one beside that he stole because that is found in his hand which is stollen and so restored Iun. And so must the five oxen be taken which the theefe must make good five with that which was stollen Lippom. 2. Now the reasons why when the thing stollen is found only double must be restored and five or foure-fold when it was killed or sold are these 1. Because he seemeth to be the more cunning theefe when the thing stollen cannot be found 2. Adhuc difficilior ratio in investigando and it is harder to finde out the theft and therefore he is
Sabbath formally who doth that which is expressely forbidden to bee done upon that day he materially breaketh it who doth a worke like unto that which is forbidden but yet is permitted by the law As if there were a law that no citizen should sell any thing to a stranger but such as were licensed to do it hee that so selleth being not allowed transgresseth the law formally he that doth it being thereunto licensed doth transgresse onely materially in that he doth the same thing which he committeth that transgresseth the law but not in that manner The same difference there was betweene the workes of the Priests which were allowed by the law upon the Sabbath day and the like workes of those which laboured in the building of the Tabernacle upon that day which were forbidden 3. Another difference is this the sacrifices belonged to the service of God which if they should have been intermitted upon the Sabbath the service of God should therby have been neglected But though the workes about the Tabernacle did cease upon the Sabbath Gods worship was not thereby neglected for they might as well be made upon other daies and so were 4. They were to do no servile works upon the Sabbath but many works necessarie for the building of the Sanctuarie were servile so were not the sacrifices and other duties performed by the Priests upon the Sabbath therefore the one were permitted upon the Sabbath and not the other Tostat. qu. 9. QUEST XIII How the Sabbath is said to bee a signe that the Lord did sanctifie them Vers. 13. IT is a signe betweene me and you that I the Lord do sanctifie you Which words are diversly expounded 1. Some make this the sense It is a signe that I sanctifie you in that I have separated you from other people selected you unto my self Vatab. Lyran. 2. Oleaster thus Sanctitas Sabbatâ— signum est munditia c. The holinesse of the Sabbath is a signe of cleanenesse which I require of you Vt ex dicato tempore Deo credamus magis nos ipsos dicuri Deo c. That by the time dedicated to God wee should know that wee our selves much more should be dedicated Cajetan But more is here signified than so the words implie an actuall sanctification not signified onely 3. Hierom saith it is so said because it was signum veri Sabbati a signe of the true Sabbath wherein wee shall rest from the labours of the world 4. So also Irenam Non sine symbole erant signa the signes were not without some symbole and signification Sabbatâ— perseverantiam totim diâ—i c. The Sabbaths holding our the whole day did signifie our continuance in Gods serâ—â—ce But here the Lord speaketh of an actuall sanctification not of a typicall signification 5. Some say it is so called quia signum erat â—udâ—ris because it was a signe of the Covenant whereby the people did bind themselves to worship the Lord for their God and such signes were all the other ceremonies Marbach But there is a morall consideration in the sanctifying of the Sabbath therefore it was otherwise a signe than the other ceremonies 6. It was then a common signe betweene God and them they holding God to be their God Creator and sanctifier because the Sabbath was a commemoration of the creation and the Lord taking them for his people whom he created redeemed and sanctified Iun. Tostat. 7. Beside the keeping of the Sabbath was a signe of difference between them and all other prophane people of the world who derided the Jewes for their Sabbaths as 〈◊〉 derided them for this Quod septimâ—m partem 〈…〉 Because they lost the seventh part of their age in resting every seventh day Tostat. qu. 10. 8. And specially it was a signe of their sanctification because that day they were sequestred by an holy rest from thinking or studying upon prophane things and in respect of the exercises of religion upon that day whereby they were sanctified sanctificaâ—â—r verbo Dei we are sanctified by the word of God Simler And they did meet together ad confirmandam 〈…〉 to confirme their faith by the sacraments Osiander And because every Sabbath discatiâ— doctrinam meam you learne my doctrine c. Iunius QUEST XIV The reasons why the Sabbath must be observâ—d Vers. 13. FOr it is a signe c. There are here divers reasons yeelded for the observation of the Sabbath 1. The first is à sine from the end it was a signe betweene God and them 2. Ab â—tili it is holy unto you that is ordained for your benefit and commoditie as our blessed Saviour saith Mark 2.27 The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Pelarg. So also Cajetan It is holy unto you that is ad vestrum bonum mandatur custodiendum it is appointed to be kept for your good 3. A necessarie from the necessitie of it because if they did not keepe it they should surely die as thrice the punishment of death is here threatned to those that defile the Sabbath and doe any worke therein Pelarg. 4. From the authoritie of the Institutor quia dicatur Domino c. because it is consecrated unto God vers 15. It is the Sabbath of the holy rest unto the Lord therefore it ought to be observed Cajetan 5. A facili from the easinesse of the precept the Lord appointeth but one day for the holy rest whereas he alloweth six for labour Pelargus 6. Ab exemplo Dei from Gods example who created the world in six daies and rested the seventh Pelarg. Simlerus 7. A consequenti from the event or consequent in observing the Sabbath efficient in succedentibus generationibus c. They shall procure that a perpetuall covenant shall be established in their generations betweene the Lord and their posteritie for ever Cajetan QUEST XV. What death is meant in this phrase He shall die the death Vers. 14. SHall die the death Whereas there are divers kinds of death there is everlasting death both of bodie and soule in the next world and the temporall death in this life either of the soule in being deprived of the life of grace or of the bodie either by the hand of God by sudden and extraordinarie death or by the hand of the Magistrate according to these divers kinds of death so is this place diversly interpreted 1. Some referre it to everlasting death and excluding from the societie of Gods servants Iun. 2. Some understand it of being deprived of the life of grace Vita gratiae destituetuâ— hic infuturo seculo c. He shall be destitute of the life of grace both here and in the next world Lippoman 3. Some of being excluded from the people of God no more to be counted an Israelite Eâ— Oleastr 4. Some of the violent death by the Magistrate Osiander Simler 5. Some of extraordinarie death when God cutteth one off and so punisheth him by death unlooked for as God is said