William Banes then and there faithfully That she the said Mary the aforesaid 77. pounds to the said William Banes then at that next Quarter that is to say at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following the promise aforesaid in the 7th year aforesaid well and truly would pay and content Or otherwise the said Mary then and there would assign to the said William Banes for his security in that behalf for the payment of the aforesaid 77. pounds All the Interest of the Term of years which she the said Mary then had to come of and in the Gardens and Bowling-Ally aforesaid if the said Mary the said 77. pounds to the said William Banes according to her assumption and promise aforesaid had not paid And the said William Banes further saith That he the said William Banes giving Faith to the promise and undertaking of the said Mary did not trouble or sue the said Mary for the said 77. pounds but did forbear the payment thereof from the time of the promise aforesaid until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel next following the promise aforesaid in the year aforesaid And the said William Banes further saith That after the premises aforesaid in form aforesaid that is to say the 10th day of November in the 4th year aforesaid at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the said Mary took to Husband the aforesaid Edward Paine Yet the aforesaid Mary whilest she was single or the said Edward and Mary after the Mariage between them solemnized the undertaking promise of the said Mary whilest she was single little regarding but threating and fraudulently intending the said William Banes of the aforesaid 77. pounds craftily and subtilly to deceive and defraud of the said 77. pounds nor the said Mary whilest she her self was single to the said William Banes at the aforesaid Quarter that is to say at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel next following the promise aforesaid in the 7th year aforesaid according to the promise and undertaking aforesaid in this behalf paid or any was for the same contented or otherwise then and there at that Feast did not assign to the said William Banes All the Interest of the Term of years which she the said Mary then had to come of and in the Gardens and Bowling-Alley aforesaid Nor the said Edward and Mary the Mariage betwixt them being celebrated at any time after he his the aforesaid 77. pounds to the said William Banes according to the promise and undertaking of the said Mary aforesaid have paid or any wayes for the same have contented him Or all the Interest aforesaid of the Term of years of the said Edward and Mary of and in the Gardens and Bowling-Ally aforesaid according to the promise and undertaking of the said Mary to the said William Banes for his security in that behalf hitherto have assigned although this to do by the said William Banes the said Mary whilest she was single and the said Edward and Mary after the Mariage betwixt them celebrated that is to say the last day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England the 8th at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid often were required By which the said William Banes all the gain commodity and profit which he with the aforesaid 77. pounds in buying selling and lawfully bargaining could have had or gained if the said Mary her promise and undertaking aforesaid in form aforesaid had performed utterly lost whereupon the said William Banes saith That he is the worse and hath damage to the value of one 100. pound And hereof bringeth sute c. And now at this day that is to say Wednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary this same Term untill which day the said Edward and Mary had License to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to Answer c. before the Lord the King at VVestminster cometh as well the aforesaid VVilliam Banes by his Attorney aforesaid as the said Edward and Mary by Isham Novell their Attorney and the said Edward and Mary defend the force and injury when c. And say That the said Mary did not take upon her in manner and form as the aforesaid VVilliam Banes above against them hath declared And of this put themselves upon the Countrey and the aforesaid VVilliam Banes likewise c. Therefore a Jury thereof was to come before the Lord the King at Westminster upon Monday next after 15. dayes of St. Hillary and who neither c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards the Prosess was continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors thereof put between them in respite before the Lord the King at Westminster untill Tuesday next after 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Lady then next following unlesse the beloved and faithful of the Lord the King Thomas Flending Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of Pleas in the Court of the said Lord the King before the King himself to be holden assigned first upon Monday next after the aforesaid 8. dayes of Purification of the blessed Lady at the Guild-hall London by form of the Statute c. cometh for default of Jurours c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westminster cometh the aforesaid William Banes by his Attorney aforesaid and the aforesaid Chief Justice before whom c. Sent here his Record before him had in these words Afterwards the day and place within conteined before the beloved and faithful of the said Lord the King Thomas Flending Knight Chief Justice within written associating to himself William Price according to the form of the Statute came as well the within named William Banes as the within written Edward Paine and Mary his wife by their Attorneys within written and the Jurours of the Jury whereof within is made mention likewise came and to speak the truth of the matter within conteined elected tryed and sworn say upon his Oath That the within named Mary took upon her in manner and form as the within written William Banes within against them hath declared and they assesse the damages of the said William by occasion of not performing the promise and undertakings within written besides the Charges and Costs by him about his sute in his behalf expended to 80. pounds and for his charges and costs to 53. shillings and 4. pence Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid William Banes shall recover against the said Edward Paine and Mary his wife the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 5. pounds 6. shillings 8. pence for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said William by the Court of the said Lord the King here with his assert of encrease adjudged Which damages in the whole do amount to 88. pound and the said Edward Paine and Mary his wife in mercy c. Assise
6 Acres of Wood with the appurtenances in Wimondham which John Smith Gentleman to the aforesaid Arthur demised for a Term which is not yet past he entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did Eject and other harms did to him to the great damage of the said Arthur and against the peace of the Lord the King that now is c. and whereupon the said Arthur by Robert Love his Attorny complaineth that whereas the aforesaid John the 19 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 8 th at Wimondham had demised to the said Arthur the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold to the said Arthur his Executors and Administrators from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past for and during the Term of 3 years from thence next following to be compleat and ended by virtu of which demise the said Arthur into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Edward afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England the 9 th with force and armes c. the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which the aforesaid John to the said Arthur in form aforesaid demised for the aforesaid Term which is not yet past entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did Eject and other harms c. and against the peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20 pound And therof he bringeth sute c. And the said Edward by Thomas Blofield his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith he is not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid as the said Arthur against him complaineth and of this puts himself upon the Country And the aforesaid Arthur likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sherif that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in three Weeks 12. by whom c. And who neither c. Because aswell c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid put was between them in respite here until this day that is to say in 8 dayes of St. Michael then next following unless The Justices of the Lord the King to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. Monday the 15 th day of July next At the Castle of Norwich in the County aforesaid first should come And now at this day cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Edward by their Attornies aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices to Assizes before whom c. send here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edward Coke Kt. Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and John Crooke Kt. one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Justices of the said Lord the King to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be holden assigned by form of the Statute c. came aswell the within named Arthur as the within written Edward Cockle by their Attornies within written And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within is made mention being called likewise came whereof 12. that is to say Robert Seaman Adam Bale Bartholmew Harison Thomas Reynolds William Bidwel Henry Howlet Thomas Crooke Richard Russel Thomas Filney Iohn Freeman John Jewel and Edmond Johnson in the Jury aforesaid are sworn After which one of the Jurors aforesaid that is to say Robert Seaman with the assent of both parties aforesaid and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid from the Pannel aforesaid was utterly drawn c. Therefore with the assent of the parties aforesaid the Jury aforesaid was further put in respite here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary Therefore that the Sherif have the Bodies c. And appoint Decem Tales At which day here cometh aswell the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Edward by their Attornies aforesaid And the Sherif now sendeth That as to the distreyning of Bartholmew Stone that the Writ was so late delivered to him that for the shortnesse of the time he could not execute it but as to the putting of the Decem Tales whereof in the said Writ was made mention the said Sherif now sendeth That execution thereof doth appear in a Schedule to the said Writ annexed in which Schedule is contained the Pannel of the names of Ten Jurors whereof none c. Therefore the Jury aforesaid again is put in respite here until from easter-Easter-day in 15. dayes unless the Justices of the King To the Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. Wednesday in the first Week of Lent at Thetford in the County aforesaid first shall come for default of Jurors c. Therefore that the Sherif distrein the Jurors aforesaid by all their Lands c. And that the issues c. So that they be here unless c. to make the Jury aforesaid c. Norff. ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edward Coke Kt. Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and John Crooke Kt. one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the statute c. cometh aswell the within named Arthur Legat as the within written Edward Cockle by their Attornies within contained And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid whereof within is made mention being called likewise come who to say the truth of the within contained chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the late King and Queen Philip and Mary the 9 th day of July in the yeer of the Reigns of the same King and Queen Philip and Mary the 4th and 6th were seised of and in the Mannor of VVimondamâ— in the County aforesaid in their Demesn as of Fee in the Right of hâ—s Crown of England whereof the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration within written then were parcel and the aforesaid late King and Queen Philip and Mary so as before is said of and in the Mannor aforesaid whereof c. being seised The said King and Queen the said 9th day of July in the yeer of the Reigns of the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary the 4th and 6th made their Letters Patents under the great Seal of Eng. to one George Howard Kt. of the aforesaid Lands and Tenements in the Declaration within written named amongst other By the names of 2 pieces of Lands called Nettlehamsted VVikemans containing by estimation 15. Acres lying and VVyndmondham aforesaid in the County aforesaid then or late in the tenure or occupation of Joh. Coleman late to the Monastery of VVyndmondham sometimes belonging and appertaining parcel of the
Trinity Term Aº 6 to of King James Calvins Case Co. 7. part Fol. 1. a. IAmes by the Grace of God of England Scotland Erance and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sheriffe of Middlesex Greetings Robert Calvin Gent. hath complained to us That Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith unjustly and without Judgement have disseized him of his Freehold in Haggord otherwise Haggerston otherwise Aggerston in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shorditch within 30. years now last past and therefore we command you That if the said Robert shall secure you to prosecute his claim Then that you cause the said Tenement to be reseised of the Chattels which within it were taken and the said Tenement with the Chattels to be in Peace untill Thursday next after 15. dayes of Saint Martin next coming and in the mean time cause 12. free and legall men of that venew to see the said Tenement and the names of them to be unbrevicted and summon them by good summonors that they be before us where ever we be in England ready thereof to make Recognition and put by suerties and pledges the aforesaid Richard and Nicholas that then they be there to hear the Recognition and have there the summons the names of the Pledges and this Writ Witness my self at Westminster the 3. day of November in the year of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 5th and of Scotland the one and fortieth For 40. s. paid in the Hamper KINDESLEY THe Assise cometh to Recognize If Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith unjustly and without Judgement did disseise Robert Calvin Gent. of his Freehold in Haggard otherwise Haggerston otherwise Aggerston in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shorditch within 30. years now last past And whereupon The said Robert who is within the age of 21. years by John Parkinson and William Parkinson his Guardians which the Court of the said King hereto this have joyntly and severally specially are admitted Complaineth That they disseised him of the Messuage with the Appurtenances c. And the said Richard and Nicholas by William Edwards their Attorney come and say That the said Robert ought not to be Answered to his Writ aforesaid because they say That the said Robert is an Alien born the 4th day of November in the Reign of the King that now is of England France and Ireland the third and of Scotland the 34th At Edenborough within his Kingdom of Scotland aforesaid and within the Alleagiance of the said Lord the King of the said Kingdom of Scotland and without the Alleagiance of the said Lord the King of his Kingdom of England and at the time of the birth of the said Robert Calvin and long before and continually after the aforesaid Kingdom of Scotland by the proper Rights Laws and Statutes of the same Kingdom and not by the Rights Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom of England was Ruled and Governed and yet is And this he is ready to aver and thereupon prayeth Judgement If the said Robert to his said Writ aforesaid ought to be answered c. And the aforesaid Robert Calvin saith That the aforesaid Plea by the aforesaid Richard and Nicholas above pleaded is in sufficient in Law to him the said Robert to Answer and to Barre him to have his Writ aforesaid that the said Robert to the said Plea in manner and form pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is holden to Answer and this he is ready to aver hereof prayeth Judgement and that the said Kichard and Nicholas to the aforesaid Writ of the said Robert do Answer And the said Richard and Nicholas for as much as they sufficient in matter in Law to him the said Robert to Answer have to his Writ aforesaid in Barr above have alleged which they are ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Robert doth not gainsay nor to the same doth in any ways Answer but the said Averment altogether to admit refuseth as at first demandeth Judgement if the aforesaid Robert to his Writ aforesaid ought to be admitted c. And because the Court of the Lord the King here are not yet avised of giving her Judgement of and upon the premises day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lord the King at Westminster untill Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear there Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lord the King here thereof are not yet c. And the Assise aforesaid remain to be taken before the said Lord the King untill the same Monday there c. And the Sheriff to distrein the Recognitors of the Assise aforesaid And before to make view c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid Robert Calvin by his Guardians aforesaid as the aforesaid Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith by their Attorney aforesaid and because the Court of the Lord the King hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day hereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lord the King at VVestminster untill Monday next the morrow of the Assension of our Lord to hear their Judgement because the Court of the Lord the King here are not yet c. And the Assise aforesaid remain further to be taken until the same Monday there c. At which day before the Lord the King at VVestminster cometh as well the aforesaid Robert Calvin by his Guardians aforesaid as the aforesaid Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith by their Attorney aforesaid c. And because the Court c. Upon which Seen and by the Court of the Lord the King here all and singular the prepremises fully understood and diligently looked into and examined and mature deliberation hereof being had because it seemeth to the Court of the Lord the King that now is here that the Plea aforesaid of the said Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the aforesaid Robert Calvin to have Answer to his Writ aforesaid to Barr Therefore it is considered by the Court of the Lord the King that now is here That the aforesaid Richard Smith and Nicholas Smith to the Writ of the said Robert further Answer c. Michael 25. and 26. of Queen Elizabeth Rott 144. Assise Dowmans Case C. 9th part Fol. 1. a. THe Assise came to Recognise if Edward Vavasor Esquire George Vavasor Gent. Richard Coats John Lawson William Musgrave Robert Thissylwood and Robert VVard unjustly c. Disseised Thomas Dowman Esq and Elizabeth his wife of their Freehold in Spaldington VVillitoft and Southcate within 30. years now last past c. And whereupon the said Thomas and Elizabeth by Henry Cressey Their Attorney complain That they disseised them of 6. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow and 200. Acres of pasture with their appurtenances c. And the aforesaid Edward George Richard John Robort Thyssylwood and Robert VVard by Edward Latimer
a sufficient replication on his part the said William prayeth Iudgement and that the said Robert from his action aforesaid against him to have be barred and the said Robert in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said Robert his action aforesaid against the said William to have and maintain above by replying hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid William doth not deny nor to the same in any wayes answereth but the averment aforesaid to admit doth altogether refuse as at first prayeth Iudgement and his debt aforesaid together with his damages by occasion of detayning his debt to be adjudged unto him c. And because the Iustices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here on 8 dayes of Saint Michael to â—ear their Iudgment thereof because the Iustices here thereof not yet c. Debt Trinity Term. Anno 10. of King James Rott 2413. In Brownlow the Common Pleas. The Case of the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne Concerning Misnaming of Corporations C. 10. part fol. 120. a. IOhn Payn late of Catton in the County aforesaid Gent. Executor of Norff. the Testament of John Payne late called John Payne of Kings Linne in the County of Norffolk Esq was summoned to Answer to the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne in the County of Norfolk of a Plea that he render to them 3000. pound which he unjustly deteineth from them c. And whereupon the said Mayor and Burgesses by Henry Bastard their Attorney say That whereas the aforesaid John Payne the Testator in his life the 27 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is c. The 6 th at Gaywood by his writing Obligatory had granted himself to be bounden to the said Mayor and Burgesses in the aforesaid 3000. pound to be paid to the said Mayor and Burgesses when thereof he was required yet the said John Payne the Testator in his life time the aforesaid John Payne the Executor after the death of him the Testator John Payne although often required the aforesaid 3000. pound to the said Mayor and Burgesses rendred not but the same denyed to them to render and the aforesaid John Payne the Executor doth deny the same yet to render to them and unjustly deteineth the same whereupon they say that they are the worse and have damage to the value of 100. pound and thereof bring Sute and bring here into Court the writing aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid testifieth c. whose date is the same day and year aforesaid c. And the aforesaid Iohn Payne Executor by Thomas Blofield his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And saith that hee of the debt aforesaid by virtue of the writing aforesaid ought not to be charged Because he saith That it is not the Deed of the said Iohn Payne the Testator and upon this puts himself upon the Countrey and the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in 3. weeks â—2 c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid were put between them in respite here untill this day that is to say in 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. upon Monday the 27 th of day Iuly next following at the Castle at Norwich in the County aforesaid first shall come And now at this day comes as well the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses as the aforesaid Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices to Assises before whom c. Send here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within conteined before Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and Iohn Croke Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Justices of the said Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. come as well the within named Mayor and Burgesses as the within written Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys within written and the Jurors of the Jury wherefore within is made mention being called likewise come who to say the truth of the within conteined chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the making of the writing Obligatory within written The Lord Henry late King of England the 8 th the 7 th day of Iuly in the year of his Reign the 29 th By his Letters Patents under his Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the same day and year and to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed Reciting by the said Letters Patents That whereas the said late King by his Letters Patents whose date was the 27 th day of Iune in the 16 th year of his Reign of his special grace and of his meer motion late had granted and by the said his Letters Patents confirmed for him his Heirs Successors to the Mayor and Burgesses and Inhabitants of his Borough of Lynn Bishop in his County of Norfolk that they for ever should be one body Corporate and one Cominalty perpetually in thing and name and that they should have perpetual succession and the name of the Mayor and Burgesses of the Borough of aforesaid Bishops Lynne in the County of Norfolk should have and bear and by the same name should be persons able and capable in Law to have purchase Lands Tenements Goods and Chattels other possessions whatsoever and to plead and to be impleaded answer and answered defend and might and could defend before any Justices whatsoever whether spiritual Judges or temporal in whatsoever Courts and in all and singular Actions Causes Matters Plaints and Demands of whatsoever kind they should be or nature in the same manner as the other the Leige people of the said late King persons able and capable in Law to plead and be impleaded to answer and to be answered defend or might defend and that the said Mayor and Burgesses and their Successors should have or might have one Common Seal for their businesses and others to be done within the Borough aforesaid happening or arising with divers other Liberties Franchisles Grants Articles and immunities in the said Letters Patents conteined and specified as in the said Letters Patents more fully and manifestly is appeared And whereas afterwards by a certain Statute late in Parliament of the said late King at London holden the third day of November in the 21
the Queen that now is of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement because the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill VVednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not as yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill Fryday next after the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is thereof not yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because this Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which seen and by the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here diligently looked into and fully understood all and singular the premises and mature deliberation being thereupon had Because it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen now is here That the aforesaid re-entry of the aforesaid VVilliam VVilkinson into the said Rectory with the Appurtenances in which c. upon the possession of the said David Loyd is not good and a lawful re-entry in Law It is granted that the said David Loyd shall recover against the said VVilliam VVilkinson his Term aforesaid of and in the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances yet to come And his damages by the Jurors in form aforesaid assessed And that the said VVilliam VVilkinson be taken c. And likewise the said David in mercy to the residue of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid whereof the said VVilliam VVikinson in form aforesaid stands acquitted And the said VVilliam VVilkinson thereof be acquitted c. Michelmas Term 41. 43. Elizabeth Rott 144. in the KINGS BENCH Bingams Case C. 2. part fol. 82. MEmorandum That at another time that is to say Easter Term last Dors ss past before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster came George Stroud Esquire by Simon Spatchard his Attorny And brought here in Court of the said Lady the Queen his Bill against Ralph Horsey Knight Richard Veal and Edward Goor Gent. in the Custody of the Marshall c. of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of him out his Farm And are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Dorset George Stroud Esquire complaineth of Ralph Horsey Kt. Rich. Veal and Edw. Goor For that That is to say That whereas one VVilliam Albert the 7th day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is 41. at Melcum in the County aforesaid had demised granted and to Farm letten to the aforesaid George one messuage 120. acres of Lands 40 Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture and 100. Acres of Furze and Heath with the Appurtenances in Melcum aforesaid in the County aforesaid To have and to hold the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances unto the said George and his Assigns from the Feast of the ANNVNCIATION of the blessed Lady the Virgin MARY then last past untill the end and Term of 6. years and a half of a year from thence next insuing fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which demise the said George into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor after that is to say the 11th day of April in the 41 year aforesaid with force and arms c into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said George thereof did enter and the said George from his Farm aforesaid thereof his term aforesaid not being ended did eject expel and amove and the said George from his possessiion thereof did hold out and do yet hold out and other harms did unto him against the peace of the said Lady the Queen to his damage of 100 pound and thereof he bringeth sute c. And now at this day that is to say Tuseday next after 8 dayes of Saint Michael this Term untill which day the aforesaid Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor had Licence to imparl to the said Bill and then to Answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come aswell the said George Stroud by his Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor by James Hyde their Attorny and the said Ralph Richard and Edward defend the force and injury when c. and say that they are not thereof guilty and upon that put themselves upon the County and the aforesaid George Stroud likewise c. Therefore a Jury thereof before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster upon wednesday next after 8 days of Saint Hillary and who neither c. to know c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the parties here c. ss Afterwards process continued between the parties aforesaid of the plea aforesaid by Juries put between the parties aforesaid in respit before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster until wednesday next after 18 dayes of Easter unless first the Justices of the Lady the Queen to take assises in the County first upon Monday the 3 weak of Lent at Dorchester in the County aforesaid by the form of the statute c. come for default of Jurors c. At which Wednesday before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of Assise before whom c. sent thither their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place
whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law be guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid or not the said Jurors are utterly ignorant And pray the advise of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid as the said Simon Baxter against them complaineth Then they assesse the damages of the said John Baxter by occasion of that Trespasse of costs and charges by him about his Sute in his part expended to one penny and for his costs and charges to 12. pence And it upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not thereof guilty as the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law above for them have alleged And because the Court of the Lord the King here is not yet avised of and upon the premises day thereof is given to the parties before the Lord the King at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. days of Easter to hear their Judgemēt of upon the premises because the Court of the L. the K. here therof not yet c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westm come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lord the King here is not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day thereof is further further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lord the King at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lord the King here thereof not yet c. Upon which The premises by the Court of the Lord the King that now is here seen and all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had For that it seemeth to the Court of the Lord the King that now is here upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid as the said Richard Sutton and John Law above for them have alleged It is granted that the aforesaid Simon Baxter take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamor thereof be in mercy c. And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law go thereof without day c. And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law recover against the aforesaid Simon Baxter 24. pound for their costs and charges by them about their defence in this part expended to the said Richard Sutton and John Law with their assent by the Court of the Lord the King here according to the form of the Statute in such case late made and provided adjudged And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law have Execution thereof c. WASTE Hillary Term 340. ELIZABETH in the COMMON-PLEAS Rot. 2380. Co. 4. part Hyndes Case Fol. 68. ELizabeth Hynde was summoned to Answer to Richard Libb Esquire of Oxon. a Plea Wherefore Whereas of the Common Counsell of the Realm of the Lady the Queen of England it is provided That it shall not be law-for any one waste spoyle or destruction to do in Lands Houses Woods or Gardens to him demised for Term of life or yeers The said Eliza. of Lands and Woods in Goring and Whitchurch which she holdeth for Term of yeers of the demise of Robert Garrard of the aforesaid Richard of the Assignment of William Haw who those to the said Robert demised for the said Term thereof made to the said Richard did waste spoyle and destruction to the dissenherisin of him the said Richard and against the form of the Provision aforesaid c. And whereupon the said Richard by Thomas Lane his Attorny saith That whereas the aforesaid William Haw was seised of a Messuage called Haw Place 200. Acres of Land 10. Acres of Meadow 100. Acres of Pasture and 50. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Goring and Whitchurch aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seised the 4th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 28th at Goring aforesaid By Indenture between the aforesaid William Haw of Haw Place in the Parish of Goring in the County of Oxon. Yeoman of the one part and the aforesaid Robert Garrard by the name of Robert Garrard of Hedsor in the County of Buckingham Gentleman made One part of which sealed with the Seal of the aforesaid Robert the said Richard here in Court brings whose date is the same day and yeer demised to the said Robert the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances Except during the life of Agnes Haw Mother of the said William such part of the Messuage aforesaid parcel of the premises Orchard and Garden One Close called Reaves Dean and one Close called Bell Close and one Orchard called the Orchard Pedel parcel of the premises which the said Agnes then occupied and then had taken and agreed to receive for her Dower of in and for the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances To have and to hold the said Tenements with the Appurtenances except before excepted to the said Robert and his Assigns from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord God then last past until the end and Term of 16. yeers from thence next insuing and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Demise the said Robert in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the 20th day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th at Goring aforesaid granted all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he had then to come of and in the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised to the aforesaid Elizabeth Hynde By virtue of which grant the aforesaid Elizabeth into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed And the aforesaid Elizabeth being thereof so possessed and the aforesaid VVilliam Haw of the Reversion thereof in form aforesaid being seised the said William the 7th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th at Goring aforesaid By his Indenture of Bargain and Sale made between him the said William of the the one part and the aforesaid Richard of the other part one part of which sealed with the Seal of the said William the said Richard here in Court brings whose Date the is same day and yeer and in the Court of the
THE DECLARATIONS AND OTHER PLEADINGS Contained in the eleven PARTS of THE REPORTS OF Sir EDWARD COKE Knight SOMETIME Lord Chief Justice of ENGLAND and one of his Majestes Council of ESTATE Rendred into English By W. HUGHES of Grayes-Inne Esquire For the benefit of all Students and Practizers of the Common Law With a Perfect TABLE of the Principal Matters thereunto Annexed LONDON Printed for W. Lee D. Pakeman and G. Bedell to be sold at their Shops in Fleet-street 1659. ACTIONS upon the CASE Easter Term Anno 43. in the Kings Bench Rott 569. 1 Lutterels Case Co. 4. part fol. 84. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say Somer ss in the Term of St. Michael last past before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came Edward Cottel Gent. by John Nightingale his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then and there his Bill against George Lutterell Esq Robert Norcome and John Quick in the Custody of the Marshal c. of a Plea of Trespasse upon the Case And are Pledges of suit John Doo and Richaâ—d Roo which Bill followes in these Words ss Somerset ss Edward Cottell Gent. complaneth of George Lutterell Esq Robert Norcome and John Quick in the Custody of the Marshall of the Marshalsey of the said Lady the Queen before the Queen being for that viz. That whereas the said Edward the 4th day of May in the 41th year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England and before he was seized of and in Two antient and ruinous Fulling Mills with the appurtenances in Dunster in the County aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee To which Fulling Mills a great part of the Water of the River in Dunster aforesaid from a certain place called the Headwear of the said River in Dunster aforesaid the said 4th day of May the 41. year aforesaid did run and also before time out of memory of Men continually accustomed and used to run And whereas also the said 4th day of May in the 41. year aforesaid and before time out of the memory of Men for the preservation direction and continuing of the right course of the said great part of the Water of the River aforesaid to run to the Fulling Mills aforesaid A certain thick bank was made of Timber and Earth neer and above the Mills aforesaid on the West part of the Course of the said great part of the said Water of the River aforesaid and was neer adjoyning to a certain Street commonly called West-street in Dunster aforesaid And also whereas the said Edward of the aforesaid Fulling Mills with the appurtenances in the form aforesaid being seized Afterwards that is to say the 28th day of October in the 41. year of the said Lady the Queen that now is The said two Fulling Mills as before is said being ruinous did totally pull down and afterwards that is to say The 20th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 42. at Dunster aforesaid in the County aforesaid in the places of them and where the aforesaid Two Fulling Mills before were made and built upon the aforesaid great part of the said Water of the River aforesaid Two Corn Mills for the grinding of Corn newly had builded erected and perfected By reason whereof the said Edward then was seized and as yet is seized of the said two Corn Mills so as before is said new built erected and perfected in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid great part of the Water of the River aforesaid in Dunster aforesaid from the the said place called the Headwear of the said River in Dunster aforesaid from the time of the new building erecting and perfecting of the aforesaid his Corn Mills untill the 10 th day of September then next following did run By pretence of which The said Edward after the building of the said Two Corn Mills until the said 10th day of September divers gains and profits of the said people of the Lady the Queen that now is for the grinding of their Corn at the said Corn Mills had gotten Yet the said George Robert and John not ignorant of the premises maliciously devising and intending the said â—dward un justly to molest and him altogether to hinder and deprive of the profits of the grinding of their Corn Mills aforesaid the said 10 th day of September in the 43. year aforesaid The said thick bank aforesaid did dig and break And the whole aforesaid great part of the aforesaid Water of the River aforesaid which to the aforesaid Corn Mills of the said Edward from the said place called the Headwear did run and ought and used to run from his antient and used course That is to say in the said Sreet commonly called the West-street in Dunster aforesaid did divert and withdraw wherby the said Edward of the grinding of the whole profit of their Corn Mills afore for a great time That is to say from the aforesaid 10 th day of September in the 42. year aforesaid until the bringing of this Bill viz. that is to say the 20 th day of November in the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 43. wholly lost to the damage of the said Edward 200 l. And therefore he brings his Sute And now at this day that is to say Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter this Term until which day the said George Robert and John had licence to imparl and then to answer c. before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the said Edward by his Attorney aforesaid as the said George Robert and John Quick by Stephen Brodrippe their Attorney and the said George Robert and John defend the force and injury when c. And say that they are thereof no wayes guilty And of this put themselves upon the Country And the said Edward likewise c. Wherefore a Jury was to come before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Thursday in 15. dayes of the Holy Trinity and who neither c. And because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards process was continued between the parties aforesaid of the plea aforesaid by Juries thereof respited between them before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael then next following Unless the Justiceâ— of the Lady the Queen assigned to take Assizes in the County aforesaid First upon Thursday the 6 th day of August at the Castle of Taunton in the County aforesaid by the form of the Statute c. shall come for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneyes aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of the Assizes before whom c. sent hither their Record had before them in these words 1 ss Afterwards the day and place
within contained before William Periam Knt. Chief Baron of the Queens Exchequer and Edward Fennier one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas holden before the said Queen Assigned Justices of the said Lady the Queen Assigned to take Assizes in the said County of Somerset by the form of the Statute c. come as well the said David Cottell Gent. by Adrian Street his Attorney As the within written George Lutterell Rob. Norcome and John Quick by Henry Collier their Attorney And the Jury whereof mention is within made being likewise called came who being chosen tried and sworn to say the truth of the matter within conteined Say upon their Oathe That the said George Robert and John are guilty of the premises within put unto them As the said Edward Cottell within against them complaineth And they do assess the damages of the said Edward for the occasion within written besides Costs and Charges by him about his sute in his part expended set to 40. s. and for Charges and Costs of sute 10 5. s. Therefore it is granted That the said Edward shall recover against the said George Robert and John his damages aforesaid by the Jury in form aforesaid assessed As also 6. l. for his Costs to the said Edward by the Court of the Lady the Queen here with his assent of increase adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 8. l. and 5. s. And the said George Robert and Iohn in mercy c. Hillary Term 38. Eliz. Anno 305. in the Kings Bench Slades Case Co. 4. part Fol. 91. a. MEmorandum At another time That is to say The Term of St. Michael Devon ss last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came John Slade by Nicholas VVeare his Attorney and brought there in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there a certain Bill against Humphrey Morley in the Custody of the Marshal c. Of a Plea of Trespas upon the Case And are Pledges of sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these Words ss Devon ss John Slade complaineth of Humphrey Morley in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas the said John the 10th day of November in the year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 36th was possessed for the Term of divers years then and yet to come of and in one Close of Land with the appurtenances in Halberton in the County aforesaid called Rack Park containing by estimation 8. Acres and so hereof being possessed The said John afterwards That is to say the said 10th day of November in the 36th year aforesaid had sowed the said Close with Wheat and Rye which Wheat and Rye in the Close aforesaid by the said John so as before is said sowed afterwards That is to say the 8th day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37th were grown into ears The said Humphrey the aforesaid 8th day of May in the sayd 37. aforesaid The said Wheat and Rye in ears upon the Close aforesayd as before is said then growing at Halberton aforesaid in consideration that the said John then and there at the special instance and request of the said Humphry had bargained and sold unto the said Humphry to the use and behoof of the said Humphry All the eares of Wheat and Coâ—n which then did grow upon the said Close called the Rack Park the Tithes thereof to the Rector of the Church of Halberton aforesaid due only excepted did assume and then and there faithfully promised That he the said Humphry sixteen pounds of lawful Mony of England to the aforesaid John in the Feast of St. John the Baptist then next following would well and truly content and pay Yet the said Humphery his assumption and promise aforesaid little regarding but endeavouring and intending the said John of the aforesaid 16. l. in that part subtilly and craftily to deceive and defraud the said 16. l. to the said John according to his assuming and promise hath not yet paid nor any way for the same contented him although the said Humphry thereunto afterwards That is to say the last day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37. aforesaid at Halberton aforesaid by the said John was oftentimes thereunto required but to pay him or content to pay him altogether refused and doth yet refuse Whereupon the said John saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 40. pounds and thereof he bringeth sute c. And now at this day That is to say Friday next after the 8. day of St. Hillary the self same Term until which day aforesaid the said Humphry had license to imparl to the Bill aforesaid and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh well the said John by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Humphery by John Halstaff his Attorny and he the said Humphry doth defend the force and Injury when c. And saith That he did not take upon him in manner and form as the said John Slade hath complâ—ined against him And upon that putteth himself upon the Country and the said John Slade likewise c. Therefore a Jury was to come before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Thursday next after 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary c. and who neither c. And because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Afterwards process was continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Juries thereof respited between them before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Wednesday next after the fifteenth day of Easter the next c. following Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen to take Assises first upon Monday the second Week of Lent at the Castle at Exeter in the County aforesaid by the form of the Satute c. shall come for default of Jurors c. At which Wednesday before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the before said Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent hither their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within mentioned before Thomas Walmesley one oâ— the Justices of the Queen oâ— the Common Pleas and Edward Fenner one of the Justice oâ— the said Lady and Queen assigned to hold plea before the Queen her sel Justices oâ— the said Lady the Queen assigned to take Assizes in the County a oâ—oesaid by form of the Statute c. come as well he was named John Slade by Thomas Clayton his Attorny as the within written Humphry Morley by Henry Collier his Attorny and the Jurors sworn whereof mention is within made likewise being
called came who to say the truth of the matters within contained being chosen tried and sworn say upon their Oath That the said Humphry Morley did buy of the said John Slade the within written Wheat and Rye in eares upon the within written Close as is said before growing being for 16. pound of good and lawful mony of England To be paid to the said Iohn Slade in the Feast of St. Iohn the Baptist then next following as in the Declaration within written is within specified And further The said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That betwixt the said Iohn Slade and the said Humphry Morley There was no promise or taking upon him besides the bargain aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found The said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as in the Declaration within written within specified or no the said Jurors are altogether ignorant and thereof they ask the Advice and Consideration of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices of the Court here That the said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as the aforesaid Iohn Slade within against him complaineth And then they do assesse the damages of the said Iohn Slade by occasion of not performance of his promise and taking upon him within written besides his charges and his costs by him in the sute aforesaid by him expended to Sixteen pounds And for those charges and costs by Twenty Shillings And if upon the whole matter by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Justices and Court here That the said Humphry Morley did not take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the said Humphry did not take upon him in manner and form as the said Humphry hath within alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of their judgement of and upon the premises to be given is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in State as now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after 15. dayes of the Holy Trinity to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. And so from Term to Term untill Saturday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid in their proper persons Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had For that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen now here That the said Humphry did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration aforesaid above specified It is granted That the aforesaid John Slade shall recover against the said Humphry Morley his damages and costs aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed As also Nine pounds for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said John Slade by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here by his assènt of encease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to Twenty and six pounds And the said Humphry Morley in mercy c. Hillary Term. 8. Jacobi Rott 1112. William Banes Case C. 9. part fol. 91. a. Mâ—morandum That at another time that is to say In the Term of St. Michael last past before the King at Westminster cometh William Banes by Thomas Ferrer his Attorny and brought here in the Court before the said Lord the King that now is his Bill against Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass upon the Case And are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Willam Banes complaineth of Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshall of the Marshalsey of the Lord the King before the King himself being for that is to say That whereas one William Havert in his life time the late Husband of the aforesaid Mary That is to say the first day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lord James that now is King of England the 6th at London that is to say in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap London was indebted to the said William Banes in 77. pounds of lawful Money of England for divers summs of Mony to him the said William Havert by the aforesaid William Banes give to loan and lent And so being endebted the said William Havert afterwards that is to say the 6th day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England the 7th at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid lying sick earnestly required the said Mary then his Wife to pay to the said William Banes after the death of the said William Havert the said 77. pounds And then and there the said William Havert made his Testament and last Will and made and constituted the said Mary Executrix of his said last Will then there dyed After whose death the said Mary took opon her the burthen of Execution of the Testament aforesaid And whereas the aforesaid Mary after the death of the said William Havert by colour of the last Will aforesaid was possessed of the interest of a Term for divers years then and yet to come Of and in certain Gardens and a Bowling-Ally scituate and being in Morefield that is to say in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shordich in the County of Midd. And the said Mary when she was single perceiving that the aforesaid William Banes intented to trouble and sue the said Mary for the aforesaid 77. pounds because that the said Mary the said 77. pounds to the said William Banes after the death of the aâ—oresaid William Havert her Husband deceased had not paid the said Mary whilest she was single afterwards that is to say 25th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of Engl. the 7th aforesaid At London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid In consideration that the said William Banes at the instance and especial request of the said Mary should not trouble or sue the said Mary for the said 77. pounds but would forbear the payment thereof until the next Quarter that is to say until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following Promised unto the said
such issue male of the body of the same Eldest Son Then to the use of the second Son of the body of the aforesaid Robert Vavasor and the heirs males of the body of the same second Son lawfully begotten and so to the 9th Son of the said Robert and for default of such issue male of the 9th Son Then to the use of Thomas Vavasor another Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for the Term of his natural life without impeachment of any wast and after his decease Then to the use of the Elest Son of the body of the aforesaid Thomas Vavasor lawfully begotten and the heirs males of the body of the said Eldest Son lawfully begotten and for default of such issue male of the body of the same Eldest Son Then to the use of the second Son of the aforesaid Thomas Vavasor lawfully begotten and the heirs males of the body of the same second Son lawfully begotten And so to the 9th Son of the aforesaid Thomas And for default of such issue male of the body of such 9th Son Then to the use of Richard Vavasor another Brother of the said peter Vavasor for the Term of his natural life without impeachment of any wast and after his decease Then to the use of the Eldest Son of the body of the said Richard Vavasor lawfully begotten and the heirs males of the body of the same Eldest Son lawfully begotten and for default of such issue male of the body of the same Eldest Son lawfully begotten Then to the use of the second Son of the body of the said Richard lawfully begotten and so to the 9th Son of the aforesaid Richard and for default of such issue male of the body of the said 9th Son Then to the use of the heirs males of the body of Peter Vavasor of Spaldington Knight lawfully begotten and for default of such issue male Then to the use of the right heirs of the said Richard Vavasor for ever By vertue of which Recovery and seisin in manner and form aforesaid had and by foâ—ce of a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th of Transferring of uses into possession at Westminster in the County of Middlesex holden made The aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire was seised of the aforesaid Tenements with the appurtenances in the view of the Recognitors of the Assise aforesaid put in his demesn as of Freehold for the Term of his life without impeachment of any wast the remainder thereof after his decease farther as abovesaid expectant and the said Peter so thereof being seised the said Peter at Spaldington aforesaid dyed without any issue male of his body lawfully begotten after whose decease the said Edward into the aforesaid Tenements with their appurtenances in the view of the Recognitors of the Assise aforesaid put and in complaint aforesaid specified amongst other as in his Remainder thereof entred and was and yet is seised in his demesn as of Freehold for the Term of his life without impeachment of any wast And the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth claiming c. And gave colour to the party And the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth as to the aforesaid Plea of the said Edward above in Barr of the Assise aforesaid pleaded Say That they for any thing in the said Plea before alleged from the Assise aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have ought not to be Barred because they say That well and true it is That the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and he the said Peter being so thereof seised The aforesaid Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances was had by the aforesaid Andrew Windsor VVilliam Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundree against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire in manner and form as the said Edward above hath alleged But the said Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth farther say That the Recovery aforesaid in form aforesaid by the aforesaid Andrew William Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundree against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid had and the seisin of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances thereupon in form aforesaid had were to the only use and behoof of the aforesaid Perer Vavasor Esquire and his heirs for ever By colour whereof and by force of the aforesaid Act of transferring of Acts in possession c. The aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The said Peter Vavasor Esq at Spaldington aforesaid of such his estate dyed hereof seised without issue of his body lawfully begotten After whose death the said Tenements with the appurtenances discended to the said Elizabeth then being the wife of the said Thomas Dowman as Sister and heir of the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq By which the said Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth in the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and were thereof seised in their demesn as of Fee in the Right of the said Elizabeth untill the aforesaid Edward Vavasor and the aforesaid George Richard John Lowson William Musgrave Robert Thisylwood and Robert Ward them the said Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth thereof unjustly and without Judgement did disseise as they above against them complain'd without that that the aforesaid Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by the aforesaid Andrew Windsor William Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundree against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire in form aforesaid had was to the uses in the Barr of the said Edward above specified as c. And thereupon the parties are at issue And the Jurours say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire was seised of the Tenements aforesaid in their view put and in the plaint aforesaid specified with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and he the said Peter being thereof so seised the aforesaid Recovery was had by the aforesaid Andrew Windsor William Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundree in form aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward above in pleading hath alleged and further the Recognitors of the Assise aforesaid say uppon their Oath That a certain Indenture was made between the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq of the one party and the aforesaid Addrew Windsor William Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundree of the other party bearing date the first day of February in the 15th year abovesaid The Tenor of which Indenture follows in these words THis Indenture made the first day of February in the 15th year of the Raign of our Soveraign Lady Elizab. by the grace of God Queen of England France Ireland Defender of the Faith c. Between Peter Vavasor of the Midle Temple in London Esq of the one party
the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 7th and of Scotland the 42 d. Rott 3642. It is contained thus Somers ss It was commanded to the Sherriff Whereas of the grievous Complaint of Owen Bray of Cobham in the County aforesaid Gent. to the Lord the King grievously complaining It was shewed That whereas John Drury Doctor of Law in the Court of the Lord the King of the Bench here That is to say In the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King of England the 5th before the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Bench aforesaid here that is to say at Westminster by Judgement of the said Court had recovered against the said Owen as well a certain debt of 200. pounds as 33. shillings 4. pence which to the said John in the Court aforesaid of the said Lord the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of the said debt whereof he is convicted And whereas also the said Owen for that that he did not come unto the said Court of the Lord the King here to satisfy the aforesaid John of the debt and damages aforesaid was put in exâ—gent in the County of the Lord the King of Sussex to Outlawry and for that occasion afterwards that is to say the 19th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is was Outlawed And notwithstanding the said Owen in execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid by virtue of a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum thereof to the late Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry by Herbert Morley Esq then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry at the Sute of the said Iohn was taken and imprisoned And after he was so taken and imprisoned was by the said Sheriff out of the same Prison at large where he would freely and voluntarily suffered to go and from the execution aforesaid was delivered as the said Owen by ways and means convenient was ready to shew Yet the aforesaid Iohn sueth forth Execution of the Debt and Damages aforesaid against him the said Owen by reason of the Recovery aforesaid and endeavoureth and threatneth unjustly him the said Owen to be taken and imprisoned to his no smal Damage Whereupon he had supplicated the Lord the Kings congâ—uous remedy for him to be provided The said Lord the King Willing what is just to be done to the said Owen in this behalf sent to the Justices here That the Complaint of the said Owen in this part being heard and calling before theâ— the Parties aforesaid and other which in this behalf they shall see to be called and their reasons thereof here being heard To the said Owen full and speedy Justice they should cause to be done in this behalf which of right and according to the Law and custom of the Kingdom of the Lord the King of England should be done And that they cause to come here at this day that is to say from the Holy Trinity in 15. dayes the aforesaid Iohn to answer of and upon the premises and further to do and receive what the Court the said Lord the King here shall consider in that behalf And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid Owen by Otho Gayer his Attorny as the aforesaid Iohn by Iohn Nye his Attorny And upon this the said Owen saith That whereas the aforesaid Iohn in the Court of the said Lord the King that now is here that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England c. the 5th before Edward Coke Kut and his Companions then Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench here that is to say at VVestminster by the consideration of the said Court recovered against the said Owen as well the aforesaid Debt of 200. pounds as the aforesaid 33. shillings and 4. pence which to the said Iohn in the same Court of the said Lord the King here was adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of detaining the same Debt whereof he is convicted And whereas also the said Owen for that he did not come into the same Court of the said Lord the King here to satisfie the said Iohn of his Debt and Damages he was put in Exigent in the aforesaid County of Sussex to be Outlawed and for that occasion afterwards that is to say the 9th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th was Outlawed upon the said Outlawry the aforesaid Iohn Drury afterwards that is to say in the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid sued forth out of the Court of the Lord the King of the Bench here a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum against him the said Owen then to the Sherriff of the aforesaid County of S. directed By which Writ the said Lord the King then commanded the said Sherriff of S. that he do not omit for any Liberty within his County but that he take the said Owen Outlawed in the said County of Sussex the said 19th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid At the Sute of the said Iohn Drury of the plea of Debt whereof he is convicted of c. And him safely keep c. So as he have his body before the Justices of the said Lord the King here in the morrow of All Souls then next comming to do receive what the Court of the said Lord the King thereof should consider in that behalf By virtue of which Writ the said Owen afterwards that is to say the 7th day of October in the 6th yeer aforesaid at Guildford in the aforesaid County of Surry by the aforesaid Rob. Morley then being Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry was taken and imprisoned And after he was so taken and imprisoned the said Owen by the said Sherriff the same day and yeer c. At Guildford aforesaid out of that Prison at large where he would freely and voluntarily to go was suffered and from the execution aforesaid was delivered And this he is ready to aver Whereupon he prayeth Judgement And that the aforesaid John from having his execution aforesaid by colour of the Judgement aforesaid be barred and that the said Owen thereof be discharged c. And the aforesaid John prayeth licence thereof to imparl here until 8. dayes of St. Michael c. And hath it c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Owen here c. At which day the plea aforesaid was adjorned by Writ of the Lord the King of Common adjornment
themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Iudgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid until the morrow of the Holy Trynity to hear their Iudgement because the same Iustices here thereof are not yet c. Actions of Debt Trinity Anno. 70. of King JAMES Vineors Case Rot. 2629 C. 8. part fo 80. a WIlliam Wilde late of Themilthorp in the County aforesaid Yeoman Norff. otherwise called William Wilde of Themilthorp in the County aforesaid Yeoman was summoned to answer to Robert Vineor of a plea that he renders unto him 20 pounds which to him he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. And whereupon the said Robert by Thomas Vynior his Attourney saith that whereas the said William the 15th day of July in the year of the reign of the Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 6th at Themilthorp by his certain writing Obligatory granted him to be bound unto the said Robert in the aforesaid 20 pound to be paid to the said Robert when he was therof required yet the said William although often required the aforesaid 20 pound to the said Robert not yet hath rendred but the same to him hitherto hath denyed and as yet doth deny whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the valew of 10 pound and thereof hebringeth sute and he brings here in Court the writing aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid doth testifie whose date is the day and year aforesaid c. And the aforesaid William by John Bussel his Atturney commeth and defends the force and injury when c and prayeth the hearing of the writing aforesaid and it is read unto him he also prayeth the hearing of the Condition of the said writings and it is read unto him in these words The Condition of this Obligation is such that if the above bounden William Wilde do and shall from time to time and at all times hereafter stand to abide observe perform fullfill and keep the Rule Order Judgment Arbitrament Sentence and final Determination of William Rugge Esquire Arbitrator indifferently named elected and chosen aswel of the part and behalfe of the said William Wilde as of the part and behalf of the abovenamed Rober Vynior to Rule order adjudge arbitrate and finally determine all matters sutes Controversies debates griefes and contentions heretofore moved and stirred or now depending between the said parties touching or concerning the sum of 22 pence heretofore taxed upon the said William Wilde for diverse kind of Parish business within the said Parish of Themilthorp so as the said A ward be made and set down in writing under the hand and seal of the said William Rugge at or before the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel next insuing after the date of these presents that then this present obligation to be void and of none effect or else the same to stand abide and remain in full power strength and virtue Which being read and heard the said William Wilde saith that the aforesaid Robert his action aforesad against him ought not to have because he saith that the Arbitrator aforesaid after the making of the writings and before the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the condition aforesaid above specified did not make any Arbitrament in writing under the hand and seal of the same Arbitrator between him the said William and the aforesaid Robert of and upon the premises aforesaid in the condition aforesaid above specified according to the form and effect of that condition this c. he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth judgement if the aforesaid Robert his action aforesaid against him ought to have And the aforesaid Robert saith That he by any thing before alleged from having his action aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith that the said William Wilde after the making of the writing aforesaid and before the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then next following that is to say the 22 day of August in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England c. the 6th aforesaid at Themilthorpe aforesaid by a certain writing which the said Robert with the Seal of the said William Sealed in Court brings whose date is the same day and yeare reciting that whereas he the said William then stood bounden to the aforesaid Robert by the name of Robert Vinyor in one writing Obligatorie in the sum of 20 pound which condition in the said writing for the performance and fulfilling of the Arbitrament Rule Order Judgement Sentence and final determination of William Rugge Esquire Arbitrator chosen aswel on the part of the said William Wilde as on the part of the above named Robert Vinyor as in the said writing Obligatory more fully is appeared or might appear then the said William intending the revocation thereof by the said writing of Revocation revoked and did call back all the authority whatsoever which the said William Wilde by the said writing Obligatory had given and commtited to the aforesaid William Rugge his Arbitrator and then altogether dissallowed and held void all and whatsoever the aforesaid William Rugge after the delivery of the same writings of revocation should do to him in and about the said Arbitrament Rule Order Iudgement Arbitrament Sentence and Determination of all matters sutes controversies debates griefs and contentions then before moved and stirred or then after depending between the said parties touching or concerning the sum of 22 pence taxed upon the said William Wilde according to the aforesaid writing Obligatory as it was in the same mentioned and declared as by the said writing of Revocation more fully appeareth and this he is ready to aver whereupon in as much as the aforesaid William Wilde after the making of the writings aforesaid before c. the said Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then next following in form aforesaid discharged and dissallowed the Arbitrator aforesaid of all authority of arbitrating of and upon the premises in the condition aforesaid above specified contrary to the form and effect of his condition and submission in the same mentioned the said Robert prayeth Iudgment and his debt aforesaid together with his damages by occasion of detayning of the same debt to be adjudged unto him c. and with that the said Robert will aver that the aforesaid writing obligatory here in Court brought and the aforesaid writing in the aforesaid writing of revocation specified is one and the same writing and not other nor diverse And the said William Wilde saith that the plea of the said Robert above by repplication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to bar him the said Robert his action aforesaid against the said William to have and maintain and that he to that plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bounden to answer and this he is ready to aver whereupon and for want of
Son that he be before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at VVestminster aforesaid from the day of Holy Trinity in 15. dayes then next following to shew wholly he did not c. And that the said Sheriff should have here the summons and the said Writ At which 15. dayes of Holy Trinity before Edmond Anderson Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench here come as well the said John Godfrey as the said Thomas VViseman the Son in their proper persons And Thomas Lucas Kt. then Sheriff of the County of Essex aforesaid returned then here the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed That is to say That the said Iohn Godfrey found to the said Sheriff pledges to prosecute his Writ aforesaid that is to say Iohn Doo and Richard Roo And that the said Thomas VViseman the Son was summoned by Iohn Den and Richard Fen Whereupon the said Iohn Godfrey in his proper person in the said Court here declaring upon his Writ aforesaid then demanded against the said Thomas VViseman the Son the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances as his right and his inheritance And into which the said Thomas had not entry but after Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the said John within 30. years then last past And whereupon then he said That he himself was seised of the Mannors Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances as of Fee and Right in the time o◠Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits to the value c. And into which c. And thereupon he then brought Sute c. And the said Thomas VViseman the Son in his proper person then did defend his Right when c. And thereof vouched to Warranty David Howel who then was present in Court in his own person and freely the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances to him did then warrant upon which the said John Godfrey then demanded against the said David then Tenant by his Warranty the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon he then said That he himself was seised of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and Right in time of peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits to the value c. and in which c. and thereupon he brought his Sute c. And the said David Howel Tenant by his Warranty then defended his Right when c. And then said That the aforesaid Hugh did not disseise the said John Godfrey of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances as the said Iohn by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposed And upon that then put themselves upon the Country And the said John Godfrey then demanded license thereof to imparle And he then had it c. And the said Iohn retorned back unto the same Court in the said Term in his proper person And the said David although solemnly demanded then came not again but in contempt of the said Court departed and made default Wherefore it was granted in the same Court That the said Iohn Godfrey should recover his seisin against the said Thomas Wiseman the Son of the Mannor Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances and that the said Thomas should have of the Land of the said David to the value c. And that the said David should then be in mercy c. And thereupon the aforesaid Iohn Godfrey then demand-the Writ of the said Lady the Queen to the said Sheriff of the County aforesaid to be directed to gve him full seisin of the Mannors Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the appurtenances And which was to him then granted retornable here without delay c And afterwards that is to say The 8th day of Iuly the self same Term came unto the said Court the aforesaid Iohn Godfrey in his proper person And the said Thomas Lucas then Sheriff of the County of Essex then here sent That he by virtue of the said Writ to him directed The 4th day of Iuly then last past delivered to the said J. Godfrey full seisin of the Mānor Tenements Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances as by the said Writ he was cōmanded Which Recovery and Execution thereupon in form aforesaid prosecuted and had was to the use of the said Thomas Wiseman the Son and his Heires for ever By virtue of which and of the said Statute in Parliament of the said Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster aforesaid the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th of transferring of uses into possessions held published and provided The said Thomas VViseman the Son was seised of the said Reversion of one Moyety of the Island aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things in his Demesn as of Fee and Right and so being thereof seized at great Totham aforesaid dyed of such his estate so thereof seised after whose death The aforesaid Reversion of the one Moyety of Island aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things to Elizabeth now the Wife of Richard Jeunius and Dorathy VViseman as Sisters and Heires of the said Thomas VViseman the Son which Elizabeth and Dorathy are yet above and in full life that is to say at great Totham aforesaid and this he is ready to aver whereupon he demandeth Judgement If the said Iohn VViseman his Action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And upon this The said Iohn VViseman prayeth license to imparle here until the next day after the Holy Trinity and hath it c. And the same day is given to the said Richard here c. And the said Iohn VViseman saith That he by any thing before alleged to have his Action aforesaid ought not to to be barred because he saith That long before the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenments aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid had By a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the most Dear Father of the Lady the Queen that now is at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex the 22d. day of Ianuary in the year of his Reign the 34th begun and there then holden and afterwards by divers progations continued untill the 12th day of May in the year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 8th the 35th held amongst other Kings It was enacted by authority of the said Parliament That whereas divers of the Noble Progenitors of the said late King Henry the 8th and especially the said late King chiefly liberally above all others had given granted or otherwise had provided to his and their loving and good Servants Subjects as well Nobles as others Mannors Meases Lands Tenements Rents Services and Hereditaments to
November next to come Unless Roger Manwood Kt. Chief Baron of the Exchequer of the said Lady the Queen upon Tuesday the 4 th day of November next following at the Guild-hall of the City of London by force of the Statute thereof provided shall first come So that inquiry thereof before the said Chief Baron then here distinctly and openly taken be had here at the aforesaid Wednesday And it is said to the parties aforesaid that they be before the said Chief Baron at the Guild-hall aforesaid the said Tuesday and that they be here the said Wednesday to hear Judgement upon the vredict of the inquisition aforesaid if c. At which day come the said Parties by their Attornies aforesaid And the said Chief Baron delivered here the tenor of this Plea together with the Writ of Distringas of the Jurors aforesaid with the Pannel of the names of the Jurors to the said Writ annexed and to the said Tenor fyled Which Tenor is indorsed thus Afterwards the day place within contained before Roger Manwood Kt. Chief Baron of the Exchequer of the Lady the Queen associating to him Walter Morley Gent. by the form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Henry Page as the within written Edward Griffin by their Attornies within mentioned And the Jurors whereof mention is within made being called some of them that is to say John Palmer Thomas James Thomas Thomas George Maunsell Thomas Bagnill and Robert Bilborough and in Jury aforesaid were sworn and because that the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore other of the standers by by the Sheriffs chosen at the request of the said Henry Page by the Command of the said Chief Baron were anew put whose names are fyled to the Pannel within written according to the form of the Statute in the such case made and provided and the Jurors so anew chosen and put that is to say George Clarke John Barnes George Ganbie Thomas Staubauke William Sutton and George Roberts being called likewise came who being together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled sworn to say the truth of the premises within contained chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the City of London is an ancient City and that all Lands and Temenents within the said City are and time whereof the memory of Men is not to the contrâ—ry were deviseable and bequeathable by Testament in Writing And that long before the time within written when it is supposed the Trespasse and Ejectment to be done That one Martin Bowes Kt. was seised of the Messuage within mentioned with the Appurtenances amongst other things in his Demesn as of Fee and that the said Martin Bowes had issue of his body lawfully Begotten one Thomas Bowes and that the said Thomas had issue of his body lawfully begotten Martin Bowes and the within named Thomas Bowes and one George Bowes And also the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Martin Bowes Kt. before the time in which c. that is to say the 29 th day of July in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 8 th made his Testament and last Will in writing and by the same amongst other things Willed and Bequeathed to the said Thomas Bowes his Son the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things for the Term of the life of the said Thomas without impeachment of Waste and after his decease then the said Martin Bowes Kâ— by his Testament aforesaid Willed that the said Messuage aforesaid amongst other things should remain to the said Martin Bowes the Son of the said Thomas Bowes To have and to hold to the said Martin Son of the aforesaid Thomas and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten And for default of any issue That then the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things should wholly remain to the said Thomas Bowes second Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son and Heir of the said Martin Bowes Knight and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue that then the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things should wholly remain to the said George Bowes third SoÌ„ of the said Thomas Bowes Son and Heir of the said Martin Bowes Kt. and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue that then the Messuage aforesaid amongst other things with the Appurtetenances should wholly remain to the Heirs males of the body of the said Thomas Bowes Son and Heir apparent of the said Martin Bowes Kt. lawfully begotten And for to default of such issue That then the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things should wholly remain to one Martin Bowes Son and Heir apparent of one Martin Bowes of Jenkins in the Parish of Barking in the County of Essex Esq and the Heirs males of his body lawfully to be begotten And for default of such issue That the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things should wholly remain to the Heirs males of the body of the said Martin Bowes of Jenkins lawfully begotten And for default of such issue That then the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things should wholly remain to one Will. Bowes son of the aforesaid Martin Bowes Knight the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten for default of such issue that then the said Messuage with the Appurtenances amogst other things should remain to the right Heirs of the said George Bowes for ever And the aforesaid Martin Bowes Kt. of the Messuage aforesaid with the AppurtenaÌ„ces amongst other things in his Demesn as of Fee in form aforesaid being seised afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of October in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 8 th dyed of the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things in form aforesaid seised After whose death The said Thomas Bowes Son and Heir of the said Martin Bowes Kt. into the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances did enter and was thereof amongst other things seised in his Demesn as of Free hold for the Term of his life without Impeachment of Waste according to the form and effect of the Testament aforesaid with the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expecting And the said Thomas Bowes so being thereof seised before the time in which c. that is to say the 19th day of December in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th by a certain Indenture between the said Thomas Bowes of the one party and one William Peltham Esq of the other party made bearing date the same day and year and in the Court of Chancery of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middlesex then being with in 6. Moneths then next following in due manner of
said 8. Messuages and other the premises by these presents bargained and sold And that he hath full power and perfect lawful good authority to bargain fell and assure the same in manner form aforesaid And further that he the said Thomas Bowes and the Heirs of the said Thomas Bowes and all and every other person and persons and their Heirs having or lawfully claiming any lawful estate or interest of or in the premises or any part or parcell thereof shall and will at the costs and charges in the Law of the said VVill. Petham his Heirs and Assignes at all and every time and times hereafter during the Term of Four years next insuing the date thereof at the reasonable request of the said William Pelham his Heirs or Assignes do cause procure and suffer to be done All and every such reasonable and further act or acts thing or things devise or devises assurance and assurances whatsoever for the further and better assurance and sure making and for the clear and absolute having and enjoying of all and singular the aforesaid premises with their Appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof to be injoyed conveyed and assured to the said VVilliam Pelham his Heirs and Assignes be it by Fine Feoffment Recovery Deed or Deeds Inrolled Inrolement of these presents Recovery with single or double Vouchers and with warranty against all men or without warranty or otherwise as shall be reasonably devised or avised by the said VVilliam Pelham or by the Council learned in the Lawes of this Realm of the said VVilliam Pelham his Heirs or Assignes And that the said 8. Messuages and other the premises by these presents bargained and sold now are of the cleer yearly value of 67. pounds 13. shillings and 8. pence of lawful money over and above all charges and reprises And after the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel which shall be in the year of our Lord God 1688. of the cleer yearly value of 71. pounds 13. shillings and 4. pence of lawful Money of England over and above all charges and reprises In witness whereof the parties aforesaid to these Indentures sunderly have set their seals Given the day and year first above written Memorandum that afterwards that is to say the 21. day of December in the year abovesaid came the aforesaid Thomas Bowes before the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery at Westminster in his proper person And did acknowledge there the Indenture aforesaid all and singular in the same contained and specified in the former above written By Colour of which bargain sail and Inrollment aforesaid as also by force of a certain Act of transferring of uses into possession in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the 27th year of his Reign holden made and provided The said William Pelham was seised of the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things in which c. as the Law requireth And the said VVilliam so being thereof seised before the time in which c. A certain Recoverie was had in the Court of Hustingâ— of Pleas of Lands holden in the Guild-hall London before the Mayor and Sheriffs of the same City according to the custom of the aforesaid City by Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke demandants against the said Willi. Pelham then Tenant of the said Messuage with the Appurtenances amongst other things in which c. in and upon a Writ of the Lady the Queen of Right Patent by the aforesaid Nicholas and Simon brought out of the Court of Chancery of the said Lady the Queen and in the said Court of Hustings and according to the custom of the City afore said prosecuted The Tenors of which Writ and the return and the proceedngs thereof as also of the Recovery aforesaid with all things touching the same follow in these words ss Pleas of Lands holden in the Hustings in the Guild hall London Monday next the feast Perpetue feliatatis In the year of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith the 14th At this Hastings came here in their proper persons Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and brought here in Court a Writ of the Lady the Queen of Right Patent to the Mayor and Sheriffs of London directed in these words ss Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Mayor and Sherifs of London greeting We command you full Right you do to Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke of 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances in London which they claim to hold of us by the free service of 1. penny by the year for all service which VVilliam Pelham Esquire deforced them that no more clamor thereof we hear for defect of Right Witnesse my self at VVestminster the last day of February in the year of our Reign the 14 th And they found Pledges to prosecute the said Writ that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo And then and there the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick put in their place VVilliam Dalby their Attorny against the aforesaid VVilliam Pelham by the said their Attorny then there demanded Process c. according to the Custom of the City aforesaid and it is granted unto them c. Upon which then it was Commanded then and there by the said Court to the Sheriffs of London according to the Custom of the said City That they summon by good summoners the said VVilliam Pelham that he be here at the next Hastings London of Pleas of Lands in the Guild-hall of the City aforesaid according to the Custom of the said City to be holden to Answer to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke in the same plea here c. At which day that is to say at the Hastings London of Pleas of Lands holden in the Guid-hall London Monday next before the Feast of St. Edward King and Martyr in the year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth c. the 14 th aforesaid The said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick by the said VVilliam Dalby their Attorny came and appeared here c. And the Sheriffs of London that is to say Henry Mills and John Branch now sent and retorned here upon the Precept aforesaid to them directed That they by virtue of the said Precept sommoned the said VVilliam Pelham to be here at this Hastings to Answer to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke in the plea aforesaid as to them c. by John Doo and Richard Roo summoners c. Which VVilliham at this Hastings put in his place Roger Coys and Robert Hogeson their Attornies joyntly and severally against the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke in the Plea aforesaid c. by VVilliam Fleetwood Esquire Recorder of the City aforesaid c. And upon this the said Nicholas
to the plea of the said Richard Horsted Tenant by his warrant aforesaid in form aforesaid pleaded to reply c. and the said Richard Horsted Tenant by hâ—s warranty aforesaid although sollemnly called came not again but in contempt of the Court departed and made default Therefore It is considered by the said Court That the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick shall recover seisin against the said William Pelham of the aforesaid 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. to hold to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and their heirs acquitted from the said William Pelham and his heirs and also from the said Thomas Bowes and his heirs as also from the said Richard Horsted and his heirs for ever and that the said William Pelam have of the Lands and Tenements of the said Thomas Bowes to the value c. and that the said Thomas Bowes have of the Lands and Tenements of the aforesaid Richard Horsted to the value c. and that the said Richard Horsted be in mercy c. and hereupon at the self same Hastings at the petition of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick it was commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and their heirs for ever of the Messuages aforesaid with the appurtenances give full and peaceable seisin and how the said Command was executed that they make known unto the Court here at the next Hastings of London of pleas of Lands in the guildhall of the City aforesaid to be holden c. at which day that is to say â—t the Hustings of pleas of Lands holden in the Guild-hall London Monday next before the feast of Saint Philip and James in the year of the said Lady the Queen the 14 th aforesaid the Sheriff of London that is to say Henry Mils and John Branch retorned and certified to the Court here c. That they by virtue of the precept to them directed full and peaceable seisin to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick of the 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. made to have according to the effect of the precept aforesaid as it was above commanded unto them c. as by the said recovery aforesaid under the seal of the office of the Mayraltie of the City aforesaid to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in evidence fully appeacheth And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath aforesaid that the said William Pelham in the Indenture aforesaid named and the said William Pelham against whom the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick sued forth the writ of Right aforesaid is one and the same person and not another nor diverse And that the said Thomas Bowes Son and heir of the said Martin Bowes Knight and the said Thomas Bowes in the recovery aforesaid specified whom the said William Pelham vouched thereto warranty and the said Thomas Bowes above named is one and the same person and not another nor divers By colour whereof the said Nicholas and Simon afterwards and before the 8 th day of May in the year of the raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14 th that is to say the first day of May in the 14 th year aforesaid in the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things entred and were thereof amongst other things seised And farther the said Jurors say upon their oath aforesaid that the recovery aforesaid of the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things in form aforesaid had was had with the assent and agreement of the said Nicholas and Simon William Pelham Thomas Bowes Son of the aforesaid Martin Bowes Knight and Richard Horsted and without any just title of the said Nicholas and Simon to the use of the said William Pelham his heirs and assigns for the farther his assurance of and in the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things according to the form and effect of the Covenants and agreements of the said indenture of bargain and sale specified by the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight to the said William Pelham as before is said made by colour of which recovery as also by force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of transferring of uses into possession the said William Pelham was seised of the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things as the Law requireth and that afterwards that is to say the first day of December in the year of the raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 16 th the said Martin Bowes Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight then being within the age of 21 years that is to say of 17 years dyed without issue of his Body Lawfully begotten And that the aforesaid William Pelham of the said Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things as before is said recovered in form aforesaid being seised before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 10 th day of September in the year of the Raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27 th demysed the said Messuage with the appurtenances in the declaration aforesaid above specified to the aforesaid Edward Griffin to have to him and his assigns from the feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then next ensuing until the end and Term of 21 years then next following By virtue of which demyse the said Edward Griffin was of the said Messuage with the appurtenances possessed and that afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of January in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th the aforesaid Thomas Bowes Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son and heir of the said Martin Bowes Knight into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances in the declaration aforesaid above specified upon the possession of the said Edward Griffin thereof entred and then and there demysed granted and to farm let to the said Henry Page the said Messuage with the appurtenances to have to him his executors and assignes from the within written feast of the birth of our Lord then last past unto the end and Term of the within written Six years and that the said Edward Griffin afterwards that is to say the within written 11th day of January in the 29th year abovesaid into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Henry Page thereof did reenter and the said Henry from the possession of the Messuage aforesaid did expel and amove and that the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight and Father of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts yet living and being in full life that is to say at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the entry of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight into the messuage aforesaid with the
the aforesaid Tuesday that is to say the 27 th day of January and before this day That is to say the 15 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32d. The said Edward by the name of Edward Griffin of London Haberdasher At London in the Parish of St. Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap London by his certain Writing of Release which the said Henry with the seal of the said Edward sealed here into Court brought whose date is the said 15 th day of January in 32 d. year aforesaid released and quit claimed to the said Henry Page by the name of Henry Page of London Merchant-Taylor All manner of Actions Sutes Errors Writs of Error Quarrels Plaints and Demands whatsoever which the aforesaid Edward against the said Henry then had depending or which at any time then after he might or ought to have against the said Henry his Executors or Administrators for any matter or thing whatsoever from the beginning of the world unto the day of the date of the said Writing of Release as by the said Writing here in Court shewed plainly appeareth And this the said Henry is ready to aver Whereupon he demands Judgement if the said Edward his aforesaid Writ for correcting of Errors against the said Writing of Release of the said Edward further against the said Henry he ought to maintain or prosecute A Tenant for Life the Remainder in Tail the Remainder in Fee Bargains and sels the Land in Fee to one who before the Statute of 14. Eliz. suffers a Recovery in which A. is vouched and voucheth over and he in the Remainder enters and the Entry adjudged Lawful and a Writ upon that is sued and the Plaintif doth release the Errors Michaelmass Term 38. 39. Elizabeth in the KINGS BENCH Rot. 551. Ejectione Firme The Rector of Chedingtons Case C. 1. part fol. 148. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say in Easter Term last Buck. ss past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came David Loyd Clerk by Stephen Worley his Attorny And brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then and there his Bill against William Wilkinson in the custody of the Marshal c. of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of him out of his Farm And are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followes in these words ss Buck. ss David Loyd Clerk complaineth of Wil. Wilkinson in the custody of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas David Roberts Clerk Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington in the County aforesaid the 26th day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 38 th at Chedington aforesaid by his Indenture sealed with his Seal and to the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is shewed bearing date the same day and year demised granted and to Farm Let to the aforesaid David Loyd The Rectory of the Parish Church of Chedington aforesaid and 60. Acres of Lands with the Appurtenances in Chedington aforesaid To have and to hold the Rectory and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said David Loyd and his Assignes from the day of the date of the Indenture aforesaid unto the end and Term of 3. years then next following and fully to be compleated By virtue of which demise The said David Loyd into the Rectory and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances aforesaid did enter and was thereof possessed untill the said William afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of Aprill in the year abovesaid at Chedington aforesaid with force and armes c. into the Rectory and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said David Loyd thereof did enter and the said David Loyd from his Farm aforesaid thereof his Term aforesaid not yet ended ejected expelled and amoved and him the said David Loyd from his possession aforesaid held out and doth yet hold out and other wrongs did unto him against the peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said David Loyd of 20. pounds and thereof he produceth sute c. With this that the said David Loyd will aver That the aforesaid David Roberts then Rector of the Parish Church aforesaid is living and is in full life c. at Chedington aforesaid c. And now at this day Saturday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael this same Term until which day the said William had license to the Bill aforesaid to imparle and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid David Loyd by his Attorny aforesaid as the said William by Richard Bedfield his Attorny And the said VVilliam defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith that he is not thereof guilty and of this he putteth himself upon the Countrey And the said David likewise c. Therefore a Jury before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster Saturday next after 1. moneth of St. Michael and who c. And because c. the same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Of which day The Jury aforesaid between the parties aforesaid was put between them in respite before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster unto Thursday next after the moneth of Ester then next following for want of Jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the said David Loyd as the said VVilliam VVilkinson by their Attornies aforesaid and the Jurors of the said Jury being called also appeared Who to say the truth of the premises being chosen tryed and sworn As to the said 60. Acres of Lands above in the Declaration aforesaid specified say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said VVilliam VVilkinson is not thereof of the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid guilty as the said VVilliam above in pleading hath alleged And as to the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid likewise specified The Jurors aforesaid likewise say upon their Oath aforesaid That long before the time in which it was supposed the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid to be done That is to say The second day of March in the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th the second One Nicholas Fitz-williams Clerk was Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington otherwise Chettington foresaid And that the said Nicholas being Rector of the said Church before the time in which c. that is to say the second day of March in the second year aforesaid at Chedington aforesaid by his Indenture made at Chedington aforesaid between the said Nicholas by the name of Nich. Fitz-williams Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington in the County of Buck. of the one party and Elizabeth Elderker Widow Ralph Elderker VVilliam Elderker and
Thomas Elderker by the name of Elizabeth Elderker Widow late Wife of VVilliam Elderker Gent. deceased Ralph Elderker VVilliam Elderker and Thomas Elderker Sons of the Body of the first named VVilliam and Elizabeth lawfully begotten of the other part which part with the Seal of the said Nicholas sealed to the Jurors aforesaid here was shewed in Evidence gave granted and to Farm had letten to the said Elizabeth Elderker the Rectory and glebe Lands of the Church aforesaid To have and to hold the said Rectory and glebe Lands with all Fruits Oblations Obversions Tithes Rights with the Appurtenances and Commodities whatsoever to the said Rectory in any manner belonging or appertaining to the said Elizabeth from the aforesaid second day of March in the second year aforesaid untill the end and during the Term of 80. years from thence and immediately following the date of the said Indenture if the aforesaid Elizabeth should so long live and should not allien grant or give the said Demise or Term And if it should happen the aforesaid Elizabeth within the said Term of 80. years to dye or to alien give or grant the Premises That then the Estate of the said Elizabeth should cease And then the said Nicholas by his Indenture aforesaid gave granted and demised all and singular the premises for so many years as then should remain unexpired after the death of the said Elizabeth or the alienation of the said Elzabeth to the aforesaid Ralph for and during the residue of the said Term of the said 80. years if he should so long live without making any alienation grant or gift of the said Term And if it should happen he to dye or to alien the premises within the Term aforesaid that then his Estate should cease And then the said Nicholas by his Indenture aforesaid gave and granted all and singular the premises to the aforesaid VVil. for and during so many years of the said Term of 80. that then should remain if he should live so long and should not alien the said Term and if it should happen the said VVilliam to dye or to alien the Premises within the aforesaid Term that then his Estate should cease And then the said Nicholas by his Indenture aforesaid gave and granted all and singular the premises for and during so many years of the aforesaid 80. years as then should continue and remain unexpired to the aforesaid Thomas his Executors and Assignes as by the said Indenture shewed to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence amongst other things it more plainly appeareth And further the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oath aforesad say That the aforesaid Lord Edward late King of England afterwards and before the time in which c. That is to say the 12th day of September in the 3d. year of his Reign the aforesaid Nicholas then being Rector of the Câ—urch aforesaid by his Leters Patents under his great Seal of England and in due manner made bearing date at Westminster the said 12th day of September in the 3d. year of his Reign aforesaid the aforesaid Lord the King then being true Patron of the said Rectory Seeing Reading and Examining the Indenture aforesaid of his speciall Grace certain Knowledge and meer mention as also with the Advice and Consent of the Beloved Uncle of the aforesaid Lord the King the Duke of Somerset Governour of the person of the King and Protector of the Kingdoms Dominions and Subjects of the said King and of other of the Council of the said King before and especially in Consideration of the most excellent present service then to the King in his Warrs then and sole in the beating back of the Scots which then late happened at Naseborough in which War the aforesaid William Elderker of fore-thought Malice was slain the said Indenture and all in the same specified and all the Right Title and Interest of the same Elizabeth Elderker Ralph Elderker William Elderker and Thomas Elderker in the said Rectory Gleable Lands Fruits and other things in the same Indenture expressed with the Appurtenances To have and to hold the said Rectory to the said Elizabeth Ralph William and Thomas and their Assignes had confirmed and ratified and in all things as much as in him was had approved for him and his Successors And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that afterwards that is to say the 21 day of January in the Reign of the said Lord Edward the 3d. aforesaid the said Nicholas being then Rector of the Church aforesaid One Henry by Divine Providence Bishop of Lincolne and of the Rectory and Church aforesaid of Chedington aforesaid Ordinary the Demyse or Grant aforesaid by the said Nicholâ—â— as before is said made all singular in the same contained for him and his Successors confirmed ratified as much as in him was approved To have hold and enjoy to the aforesaid Eliz. Ralph Wil. Elderker Th. Elderker during the Term aforesaid as by the said several Confirmations in due manner made and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed more fully appeared By colour of which Demyse and several Confirmations aforesaid in form aforesaid made the aforesaid Elizabeth Elderker into the Rectory aforesaid and the Glebe Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed And she thereof being so possessed The said Nicholas Fitz-williams afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 10 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lady Mary late Queen of England the first at Chedington aforesaid then being Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington aforesaid dyed And the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said Thomas Elderker afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 16 th at Greenwich in the County of Kent dyed intestate the said Elizabeth of the Rectory aforesaid and of the Glebe Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being possessed And the said Elizabeth being thereof so possessed the aforesaid VVilliam Elderker afterwards that is to say the 8 th day of July in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 17 th likewise dyed And the aforesaid Elizabeth Elderker so of the Rectory and Glebe Lands aforesaid possessed as is said afterwards That is to say The 20 th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 17 th aforesaid at Chedington aforesaid the said Eliz. Elderker likewise dyed and the said Ralph Elderker did over-live her and into the Rectory aforesaid and the Glebe Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances By virtue of the Demyse aforesaid likewise entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the said Ralph Elderker afterwards that is to say the 10th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18
Agmondesham afterwards that is to say the 17th day of February in the 36th year aforesaid at Chedington aforesaid demised granted and to Farm let the Rectorie aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances to one Michael Weston To have and to hold unto the said Michael and his assigns from and immediately after the end expiration and determination of the said demise to the said Thomas Tasburgs by the aforesaid John Agmondesham as is said made until the end and Term of 21 years from thence next following fully to be compleated if the said Michael Weston and one Margaret Bromley or any of them should so long live By virtue of which demise the said Michael Weston afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 26 day of March in the year of our Lord 1595 at Chedington aforesaid into the Rectory aforesaid and glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the said Michael afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 22 day of May in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 37 at Chedington aforesaid by his Indenture with the seal of the said Michael sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed Granted and assigned all his Interest Estate Term of years and demand then to come and unexpited of and in the Rectorie aforesaid and gleabe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said William Wilkinson now defendant By virtue of which grant the said William into the Rectorie aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and the said William so being possessed the said David Roberts Clerk afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 11 day of January in the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 38th to the Rectory of Chedington aforesaid was lawfully presented admitted instituted and Inducted By virtue of which the said David Roberts into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred was thereof possessed in his Demesn as of Fee in the right of his Church of Chedington aforesaid And so being seized afterwards before the time in which c. that is to say the 26th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 38th aforesaid by Indenture in the Declaration aforesaid specified Demised the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration likewise mentioned to the aforesaid David Loyd To have and to hold to the aforesaid David Loyd from the day of the date of the same Indenture unto the end and Term of three yeers then next following and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Demise the said Dav. Loyd afterwards that is to say the 27th day of March in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 38th into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed untill the said William Wilkinson afterwards that is to say the said 10th day of April in the 38th yeer aforesaid into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said David thereof entred and him the said David from thence his Term aforesaid not yet ended did eject expell andamove as the said David Loyd above against him complaineth And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That as well the said David Roberts as the said Michael Weston are yet alive and in full life that is to say at Chedington aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the re-entry of the said VVilliam VVilkinson into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid above specified upon the possion of the said David Loyd thereof in manner aforesaid made be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and lawfull re-entry in Law or not the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant Whereupon they pray thereof the advice and discretion of the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is before the said Lady the Queen her self being And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Court of the said Lady the Queen That the aforesaid re-entry of the aforesaid VVil. VVilkinson into the said Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances in which c. upon the possession of the said David Loyd be not a good lawful re-entry in Law then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath aforesaid That the aforesaid VVilliam VVilkinson the said David Loyd from his Farm aforesaid of the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances in which c. unjustly did eject And that the Ejectment aforesaid the Trespass in the Declaration aforesaid specified as unto the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances the said VVil. VVilkinson is guilty in manner and form as the said David Loyd above declaring hath alleged And then they assesse the damages of the said David by the occasiō of the Ejectment and Trespass in the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances besides his charges and costs by him in the Sute aforesaid in this behalf expended to 3. shillings and 4. pence and for his costs and charges to 12. pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the said Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the said entry of the said VVilliam VVilkinson into the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said David thereof in the from aforesaid made be a good and lawful re-entry in Law Then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said VVilliam VVilkinson is not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment of the Farm aforesaid as to the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances as the aforesaid VVilliam VVilkinson above in pleading hath alleged And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here of their Judgement of and upon the premises to be given are not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill Fryday next after the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of their Judgement of and upon the premises to be given is not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgemen thereof c. because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminst come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court o◠the said Lady
c. seised and so thereof being seised after and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 7 th day of April in the Reign of said Lady the Queen that now is the 41 th aforesaid the aforesaid Iohn Stroud and Ann his wife and the said Richard Bingham upon the Tenements within written By their writing sealed with their seals bearing date the second day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 41 th aforesaid to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed at Melcum aforesaid demised the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. to the within named William Albert To have and to hold to him and his assignes from the Feast of the Anunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then last past before the date of the said writing for the Term of 7 years from thence next and immediately insuing fully to be complete and ended yielding therefore yearly during the term aforesaid 140 pound per. An. at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions to be paid By virtue of which demise the aforesaid William Albert the aforesaid 7 th day of April in the year 41 aforesaid into the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth and so being thereof possessed after and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the aforesaid 7 th day of April in the year 41 aforesaid the said William Albert upon the Tenements within written entred and demised the Tenements within written with the appurtenances in which c. to the aforesaid George Stroud as in the declaration within written above is specified By virtue of which the aforesaid George Stroud the aforesaid 7 th day of April in the 41 th year aforesaid into the Tenements within written in the Declaration within written mentioned in which c. entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth until the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor the within written 11 day of April in the 41 year aforesaid upon the possession of the said George Stroud his term aforesaid not yet ended did eject expel and amove But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found the entrie of the said George into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances be lawful or not the said Jurors altogether do not know and pray thereof the advice of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here c. That the Entry of the said George Stroud into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances be lawful Then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor are guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment within written as the aforesaid George Stroud within against them complaineth And then they assesse the damages of the said George by occasion of the Trespasse and Ejectment within written above his charges and costs by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 2. shillings and for his costs and charges to 20. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here c. That the Entry of the said George Stroud into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances be not lawful Then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor are not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment within written as the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor thereof within alleged And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Q. at Westminster Untill Fryday next after the morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving her Judgement of and upon the premises are not avised Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster Untill Thursday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to here their Jugement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Q. here of their Judgement to be given of upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid untill Wednesday next after the 18 th day of Easter to hear their judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Friday next after the morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day come the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which seen And by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereof had It is granted That the said George Stroud shall recover against the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor his Term aforesaid of and in the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid specified yet to come and his damages aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed As also 12. pound for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said George Sroud by the Court of the said Lay the Queen here with his assent of encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 13. pound and two shillings And the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal
and Edward Goor be taken c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Term 290. Elizabeth Rott 790. in the KINGS BENCH Barastons Case C. 3. part fol. 19. a. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say Michaelmass Term last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came Richard Hynde by James Long his Attorny and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against William Ambry in the Custody of the Marshal c. Of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of his Farm and are Pledges of Sute that is to say Iohn Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Hartford Richard Hynde complaineth of William Ambry in the custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas one Thomas Brand and Constance his Wife and Milliam Davyes and Margaret his Wife the 4 th day of Iuly in the yeer of Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 28 th at Aldenhan in the County aforesaid Demised and granted and to Farm let to the aforesaid Richard Hynde amongst other things 10. Acres of Land with the appurtenances called the upper part of a Close named Reddings in Aldenham aforesaid in the County aforesaid To have and to hold the aforesaid 10. Acres with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Hynde and his Assignes from the Feast of St. Iohn the Baptist then last past until the end and Term of 7. years from thence next insuing and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which demise The said Richard Hynde into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Land with the appurtenances the aforesaid 9 th day of Iuly in the 28th yeer aforesaid with Force and Armes c. into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Richard entred and him the said Richard from his Farm aforesaid the Term thereof not yet ended did eject expel and amove and then the said Richard from his possession thereof held out and as yet holdeth out And other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Queen to the damage of the said Richard of 10. pounds and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Monday after 8. dayes of St. Michael this Term until which day the said William had license to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Richard by his Attorny aforesaid as the said William by Richard Belfield his Attorny and the same William doth defend the force and injury when c. And saith That he is not guilty thereof and of that he puts himself upon the Country And that said Richard likewise Therefore a Jury thereof before the Lady the Queen at Westminster Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter who neither c. Because as well c. the same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Afterwards the processe thereof was continued between the parties aforesaid in the Plea aforesaid by Juries put between them in respite before the said Lady the Queen until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael then next following Unlesse the Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County aforesaid assigned First upon Friday the 12 th day of July at Hartford in the County aforesaid by form of the Statute c. come for default of Jurors c. At which VVednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid Richard Hynde by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Gawdy Knight one of the Justiceâ— of the Lady the Queen of Pleas before the Lady the Queen her self to be holden assigned and Robert Clark one of the Barons of the said Lady the Queen of her Exchequer Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County of Hartford assigned by form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Richard Hynde by Henry Brantwayte his Attorny as the within written William Ambry by his Attorny within mentioned and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made some of them that is to say Richard Penifather Thomas Glascock Iohn Harmer and Stephen Nebbes came and in the said Jury are sworn And because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore other of the Standers by chosen by the Sherif at the Request of the said Richard Hynde and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid are of new put whose names to the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such Case late made and provided and some of the Jurors so a new put that is to say Edward Vyall Thomas Cooker Thomas Trow Edward Asher Iohn Dermer William Tiverton Edward Iorden and Robert Carpenter came who to say the truth of the matters within contained togeether with the Jurors aforesaid first unpannelled and sworn chosen tryed and sworn Say upon their Oath That long before the Trespass and Ejectment of the Farm within supposed to be done One Thomas Boraston was seised of and in the within written 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances called the upper part of a Close called Reddings in Aldenham within written in his demesn as of see the said 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances held of one Robert Stepnigh Esq as of his Mannor of Aldenham in his free socage And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Tho. Boraston had issue of his body lawfully begotten Hum Boraston his Elder Son Hen. Boraston his Younger Son and the aforesaid Hum. Boraston had issue of his body Lawfully begotten Constance Boraston now the wife of the within named Thomas Brand and the within named Margaret wife of the within named William Davis and that afterwards Humphrey Boraston dyed living the said Thomas Boraston and that the aforesaid Constance and Margaret were and are Daughters and Co-heirs of the aforesaid Humphry Boraston and farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the aforesaid boraston so of and in the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances being seised as before is said afterwards that is to say the 12 th day of the moneth of August in the year of our Lord 1559 in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen the first made his Testament and last Will in writing in these English words following In the name of God Amen Item I give unto Thomas Amerie and Amphillis his wife all that my upper part of my close called Redding for the Term of 8 years after my decease in recompence of one yearly Annuity of 46
the Queen that the re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and Lawfull re-entry then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the said William Ambry is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment of the farm aforesaid as he before for himself hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement further of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state that now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill thursday next after 8 dayes of Saint Hillary to heare their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet have avised c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state it now is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until wednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. And so from Term to Term until the plaint aforesaid was farther adjroned by another writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common adjournment before the Queen until the morrow of All Souls at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford at which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is farther given to the parties aforesaid in state as it is now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford until Tuesday next after 3 dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement c. because c. Before which day the plaint aforesaid was adjorned by a writ of the Lady the Queen of common adjornement before the said Lady the Queen untill 8 dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster at which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill VVednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here and the premises diligently looked into and thereof mature deliberation being thereof had Because it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the entrie of the aforesaid VVilliliam Ambry above specified into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Richard Hynde was a good and lawfull re-entry therefore It is granted that the aforesaid Richard Hynde take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but that he for his false clamour be taken c. and the aforesaid VVilliam Ambry be thereof without damage c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Terme 36. Eliz. Rott 440. in the Kings Bench. Sir George Browns Case C. 3. part fo 45. WIlliam Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman and Thomas Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman were attached to answer to James Linche of a plea wherefore with force and armes one Messuage one Barn 80 Acres of Land 80 Acres of Meadow and 80 Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in Swindon which George Brown Knight to the aforesaid James demised for a Term which is not yet ended they entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did eject and other harms did unto him to the grievous damage of the said James and against the peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. and whereupon the said James by Thomas Cooper his Attourny Complaineth That whereas the aforesaid George Brown the 22 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 35 th at Swindon aforesaid had demised to the said James the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the said James and his assigns from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past until the end and Term of 4 years from thence next ensuing and fully to be compleated By virtue of which demise the said James into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid William and Thomas afterwards that is to say the 22 th day of October aforesaid in the 35 th year aforesaid with force and armes c. the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which the said George Brown to the said James in form aforesaid demised for the term aforesaid which is not yet ended entred and him the said James from his Farm aforesaid held out and other harms c. To the grievous damage c. and against the peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20 pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid William and Thomas by John Paxton their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And say that they in nothing are guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid as the aforesaid James above against them complaineth and of this put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid James likewise c. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he have here in 8 dayes of the Purification of the blessed Lady 12 good and Lawfull men c. by whom the truth c. and who neither c. Because aswell c. afterward the process between the parties aforesaid was continued of the plea aforesaid by Jurors put between them put in respite here until this day that is to say in 8 dayes of Saint Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen for Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the statute upon Thursday the 17 day of July last past at New Sarad in the County aforesaid first came And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid James Linche as the aforesaid William Spencer and Thomas Spencer by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices of Assise before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Walmesley one
of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Edward Fenner one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned Justices of the Assiise of the Lady the Queen in the County of Wilts to be taken Assigned by the form of the statute came aswell the within named James Linche as the said within written William Spencer and Tho. Spencer by their Attorneys within mentioned and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say William Garret of Shaw Gentleman William Bury of Crickland Thomas Puckley of Nether Haven Gentleman William Marse of Haydon John Noyse of Graston Richard Legge of Nether Haven Thomas Smith of Kinnett Thomas Stoper of Moanton and VVilliam Gouldesborough of the same came and are sworn of the same Jury and because that the rest of the Jurors of the Jury did not appear therefore other of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid at the request of the said James and by the command of the Justices aforesaid were new put whose names to the Panâ—nel within written are filed according to the statute in such case lately made and provided And the Jurors so of new put that is to say Thomas Stringer VVilliam Bundy and VVilliam Hascal likewise called came who to the truth of the matter within conteined together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the aforesaid VVilliam Spencer is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment within written as the said VViliam hath within alleged and further the said Jurors as to all the Trespass Ejectment aforesaid within written besides the Trespass and Ejectment in the Messuage within conteined and 26 Acres of the Tenements within written by the aforesaid Thomas Spencer within supposed to be done they say upon their Oath that the said Tho. is not thereof guilty as the said Tho. likewise therof within allegeth and as to the Trespass and Ejectment within written into the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land within supposed to be done the same Jurors say upon their Oath that long before the within written time in which it is supposed the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid to be done one Richard Bridges Knight was seised as well of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land with the appurtenances as of the other Tenements within written residue with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised the said Richard long before the time aforesaid in which c. by his certain writing of Feoffment Indented in Consideration of a certain Ioynture of one Iohanna the wife or Daughter of VVilliam Spencer Knâ—ght deceased from thence after to be had and ended gave and granted and in his said writing Indented confirmed to Iohn VVinchcomb the Elder of Newberry in the County of Berks. and John Knight of Newbery aforesaid the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to have and to hold the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said John VVinchcomb and John Knight their heirs and assignes for ever under this Condition following that is to say That the said John VVinchcomb and John Knight within one moneth next ensuing after the date of the said writing by their sufficient writing in Law as by the learned Councel in the Law of the said Richard â—ridges it should be avised should give grant and deliver the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said Richard and the said Johanna his wife to have and to hold the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said Richard and the said Johanna and to the heirs of the bodies of the said Richard and the said Johanna his wife betwixt the said Richard and the said Johanna Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the right heirs of the aforesaid Richard for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services therefore due and of right occasioned as by the said writing of Feoffment Indented Sealed with the Seal of the said Richard Bridges and bearing date the 23 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8 th the 32 th to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed more fully appeared and that by virtue of the said Feoffment the aforesaid John Winchcomb and John Knight were seised of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Lands in which c. amongst other in their demesn as of Fee upon the condition aforesaid And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That the said John Winchcomb and John Knight being so thereof seised long before the aforesaid time in which c. and within the said one Moneth next insuing after the date of the said writing of Feoffment Indented at Walcot aforesaid in performance of the condition aforesaid and at the request of the said Richard Bridges by their certain writing Indented of Feoffment delivered enfeoffed and delivered and by the said their writing Indented they did confirm to the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna his Wife the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to have and to hold the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other to the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna his Wife and the heirs of the bodies of them the said Richard and Johanna betwixt them Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remaynder thereof to the right heirs of the said Richard Bridges for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services thereof due and of right accustomed as by the said writing of Feoffment Indented with the Seals of the said John Winchcomb and John Knight Sealed and bearing date the 6th day of February in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th the 32 th aforesaid and to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed it more fully appeareth And that by virtue of the said Feofment the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna were seised of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other in their demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to the said Richard and Johanna and the heirs of their bodies between them Lawfully begotten the remaynder thereof to the right heirs of the said Richard as above is said And the said Richard and the said Johanna so thereof being had issue of their bodies between them Lawfully begotten one Anthony Bridges his Son yet living and in full life being that is to say at West Shefford in the County of Berks and that afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna of the aforesaid
not yet concealed nor detained but the Rents and the Reversions thereof to the said Lord the King and Lady the Queen then were answered And that Mannor was in charge and account of Record and the Rents and the Reversions thereof to the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary were answered But whether the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration above mentioned by the said Letters Patents to the aforesaid George Howard Kt. passed or not the Jurors aforesaid are ignorant and thereof pray the Advice and Consideration of the Court in the premises And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices of the Court That the aforesaid Lands and Tenements in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the Lord Philip and Mary late King and Queen of England to the aforesaid George Howard did passe Then the Jurors aforesaid say that the aforesaid Edward Cockle is not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment as he before in pleading hath alleged And if upon the whole matter by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court That the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration within written by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the Lord Philip and Mary King and Queen of England to the said George Howard passed not c. False Imprisonment Michaelmass Term in the 6th yeer of King JAMES in the COMMMON-PLEAS Doctor Bonhams Case Co. 8. part London HEnry Atkins of London Doctor of Physick George Turner of London Doctor of Physick Thomas Moundford of London Doctor of Physick John Argent of London Doctor of Physick John Taylor of London Yeoman And William Bowden of London Yeoman were Attached to answer to Thomas Bonham of London Doctor in Philosophy and of Physick of a Plea wherefore they together with William Dun of London Doctor of Physick and Richard Ware of London Skinner with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham took imprisoned and evil handled and him in Prison against the Law and Custom of the Kingdom of England did long detain and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said Thomas Bonham and against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is c And whereupon the same Thomas Bonham by Richard Coke his Attorny complaineth That the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together c. the 10th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 4th with force and Arms him the said John in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and evilly handled and him there so in Prison a long time that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England detained and other harms c. to the great damage c. and against the Peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 300. pounds and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden by Francis Barker their Attorny come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming with force and Arms say That they are not thereof guilty And of that put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid Thomas Bonham likewise And as to the rest of the Trespass and Imprisonment aforesaid above supposed to be done The said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and VVilliam Bowden say That the aforesaid Thomas Bonham his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have because they say That before the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid Trespasse and Imprisonment to be done The Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 23d day of September in the yeer of his Reign 〈◊〉 by his Letters Patents which the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden with his great Seal of England sealed bearing date at VVestminster the same day and yeer here in Court brought Reciting Wherereas he thought it the duty of his Kingly Office in all reason to provide for the good and welfare of his People That would first of all be done if he might in due season meet with the enterprizes of wicked men first therefore ye held it necessary to restrain the boldness of wicked men who professed Physick more for avarice than out of confidence of a good Conscience Whereupon very many incommodities did arise to the rude and credulous Cōmon-people Therefore partly imitating the example of the well-governed Cities and other Nations inclined thereunto at the request of the grave Men and Doctors John Chambre Thomas Linacre Ferdinand de Victoria his Physicians of Nicholas Hatswel John Francisco and Robert Yoxley Physicians and chiefly of the right Reverend Father in Christ and Lord Thomas titled of the Holy Church beyond Tyber Priest of the most Holy Church of Rome Cardinal of York Arch-Bishop and our Well beloved Chancellor of our Kingdom of England A College perpetual of Doctors and Grave Men who Physick in his City of London and the Suburbs and within 7. Miles from the said City every way might publickly exercise he Willed and commanded to be instituted to whom for his honour and in the name of the publick good and care as he hoped the ignorance and rashness of the malitious which he remembred as well by their example and gravity to deterr as by his Lawes late made and and by Constitution to be made by the same College to punish Which that they might more easily well accomplish to the remembred Doctors John Chambers Thomas Linacre Ferdinand de Victoria his Physicians Nicholas Hatswel John Francisco and Robert Yoxley Physicians he granted that they and all Men of the same faculty of and in the City aforesaid should be in deed and Name one Body and Comminalty perpetual or College perpetual and that the said Comminalty or College every yeer for ever might chose and make of that Cōminaltie any diligent man and skilful in the faculty of Physick to be President of the said College or Comminalty to oversee rule and govern for that yeer the College or Comminalty aforesaid and all men of the said faculty and their businesses And that the said President and College or Comminalty should have perpetual succession and a Common Seal to serve for the businesses of the said Comminalty and President for ever And that they and their Successors for ever should be persons able and capable to purchase and possesse in Fee and for ever Lands Tenements Rents and other possessions whatsoever He also granted to them and their Successors for him and his Heirs That they and their Successors might purchase to them and their Successors aswell in the said City as out of it Lands and Tenements whatsover not
examined strictly by the said Supervisors according to the form devised by the said Elects and also by the said Supervisors approved as by the said Act amongst other things more fully appeareth And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William further say That afterwards and before the time in which c. By another Act of Parliament of the Lady Mary the Queen of England the 24th day of October in the year of the Reign the first at Westminster aforesaid That whereas in the Parliament holden at London the 5th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 14th and from thence adjourned unto VVestminster the last day of June in the yeer of his Reign the 15th and there holden It was Enacted That a certain grant by Letters Patents of Incorporation made and granted by the aforesaid late King to the Physicians of London and all clauses and Articles contained in the said grant should be approved granted ratified and confirmed by the said Parliament In consideration whereof It was Enacted by the Authority of the same Parliament That the aforesaid Statute and Act of Parliament in all the Articles and clauses in the same contained from thenceforth for ever should stand and continue in full strength force and effect any Statute Law Custom or any thing made had or used to the Contrary in any thing notwithstanding And for the better Reformation of divers enormities happening to the Commonwealth by the evill usage and undue administration of Physick and for the amplifying and inlarging of the last Articles for the better execution of the things in the aforesaid grants conteined it was further Enacted That whensoever the President of the College or Comminalty of the faculty of Physick in London for the time being or such as the aforesaid President and College yearly according to the Tenor and meaning of the same Act should authorize to search examine and correct and punish all offenders and transgressors in the aforesaid faculty within the same City and precinct in the aforesaid Act expressed should send or commit such offender or offenders for his or their offences or disobedience contrary to any Article or Clause conteined in the aforesaid grant or Act to any Ward Gaol or Prison within the aforesaid City and precinct aforesaid the Tower of London excepted that then and from time to time the Warders Gaolers and Keepers of the Wards Gaols and Prisons within the City or precinct aforesaid the Tower of London excepted should receive into his or their Prisons all and every such person or persons so offending which should be sent or committed to him or them as aforesaid and there safely should keep the person or persons so committed into any of their Prisons at the proper costs and charges of the person or persons so committed without Bail or main prise until such offender offenders or disobedients be discharged of the aforesaid imprisonment by the aforesaid President and such persons as by the aforesaid College should be authorized upon pain that every such Warder Gaoler or Keeper doint the contrary should lose and forfeit double of such fine and amercement as such offender or offenders or disobedients should be assessed to pay by such as the said President and College as should be authorized as before is said so as the said Fine and Amercement should not be at any time above the sum of 20 pound the moiety whereof to be imployed to the use of the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to the aforesaid President and College all which forfeiture should be recovered by Action of debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the said late Queens her heirs or successors Courts of Record against any such Warden Gaoler or Keeper so offending in which no Essoin wager of Law nor Protection should be allowed nor be admitted for the defendant And further it was Enacted by the authority of the said Parliament That all Justices Mayors Sheriffs Bayliffs Constables and other Ministers and Officers within the City and precinct aforesaid upon request to them made should help aid and assist the President of the aforesaid College and all persons by them from time to time authorized for the due execution of the said Act or Statute upon pain for not giving of help to them of being in cōtempt of the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors as by the same Act amongst other things more fully appeareth And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William further say That by virtue of the said Letters Patents and by force of the Statutes aforesaid One Thomas Langhton Doctor of Physick a man diligent and skilful in the faculty of Physick and then one of the Comminalty of the College of Physitions in London aforesaid before the time in which c. that is to say the 30 th day of September in the year 1605. at the College of Physicians situate in London in the Parish of Saint Bennet-Pauls-Wharf in the Ward of Baynards Castle was duly chosen President of the College aforesaid and then and there held the said Office of President of the College aforesaid And the said Thomas Langton being President of the College aforesaid The same President and Cōminalty of the College aforesaid the same 30th day of September in the yeer 1606 abovesaid at the College aforesaid chose Ralph Wilkinson William Du◠Richard Palmer and John Argent diligent men and skilful in the faculty of Physick and then being 4. Doctors of the College aforesaid to be the 4. Censors or Governours of the Comminalty aforesaid to oversee teach correct and govern all and singular Physicians of the said City using the faculty of Physick in the said City and other forein Physicians whomsoever frequenting to and using the said faculty of Physick any wayes within the said City the Suburbs thereof or within 7. Miles in circuit of the same City and to punish their defects in not well exercising doing and using the same As also to oversee and search all manner of Medicines and their Receipts by the said Physicians or any of them for curing of infirmities as often as need should be And to punish the said Physicians Delinquents exercising the said faculty of Physick by Fines Amercements and Imprisonment of their Bodies and other wayes reasonable and fitting according to the form and effect of the said Letters Patents and the Statutes aforesaid And the said Thomas Langton being President of the College aforesaid and the aforesaid Ralph Wilkinson William Dun Richard Palmer and John Argent being likewise the 4. Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid The aforesaid Thomas Bonham within the aforesaid time in which c. That is to say the 10th day of Aprill in the yeer of our Lord 1606. within London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Lady of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid
contrary to the form and effects of the Letters Patents aforesaid and the aforesaid Statute made in the Parliament aforesaid of the said King Henry the 8th did practise Physick not admitted by the Letters of the aforesaid President and College sealed with their Common Seal whereas in truth the aforesaid Thomas Bonham was insufficient to practise Physick By reason whereof the said Thomas Bonham afterwards that is to say the 13th day of April in the yeer of our Lord 1606. at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid was summoned by the aforesaid Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid to appear before the President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid at the College aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the 14th day of April in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid then next following to be examined upon the premises At which 14th day of April in the yeer of our Lord 1606. aforesaid at the College aforesaid came the aforesaid Thomas Bonham in his proper person and there was examined of his science in his facultie of Physick administred by the aforesaid Censors or Governors of the College aforesaid and because the said Thomas Bonham so examined answered very insufficiently in the Art of Physick then and there upon his examination aforesaid and was â—ound by the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid very insufficient and unskilful to administer Physick And for that the aforesaid Thomas Bonham being many times examined and forbidden by the President and Censors or Governours aforesaid for the causes aforesaid to adminster Physick for a Moneth or more after such forbidding of him within London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward aforesaid without the license of the aforesaid President and College under their common Seal contrary to the form of the Letters Patents aforesaid and the Statutes aforesaid did practise Then and there it was granted by the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid That the aforesaid Tho. for his Dissobedience and Contempt be amerced to 100. shillings in the next assembly of the aforesaid President and College at the College aforesaid to be paid And then and there it was commanded to the said Thomas Bonham by them the President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Bonham from thenceforth should forbear to practise Physick within the aforesaid City of London and the Suburbs thereof and 7. Miles circuit of the said City until the said Thomas Bonham were found to be sufficient and should be admitted to practise the said Art of Physick within the City and circuit aforesaid by the President and College aforesaid under the pain of being cast into Prison if in the premises as is aforesaid he should offend And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden further say That after and before the aforesaid time in which c. That is to say the first day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid At the College aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid The aforesaid Thomas Langton Doctor of Physick a man diligent and skilful in the faculty of Physick then one of the CoÌ„minalty of the College of Physicians in London aforesaid and one of the Electors of the College aforesaid was elected and chosen into the Office of President of the College aforesaid for one year then next following and the Office of President of the College aforesaid then and there held And the said Thomas Langton being President of the College aforesaid the same President and Comminalty of the College aforesaid the said first day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid at the College aforesaid chose the aforesaid George Turner Thomas Moundford William Dun and John Argent Doctors men diligent and skilful in the faculty of Physick and then being 4. of the College aforesaid to supervise search correct and govern all and singular the Physicians of the said City exercising the faculty of Physick in the said City and other forein Physicians whomsoever frequenting to and exercising the said faculty of Physick within the same City and the Suburbs of the same City or within 7. Miles circuit of the said City And to punish their defects in not well exercising doing and using the same As also to oversee and search all manner of Medicines and Receipts by the said Physicians exercising the said faculty of Physick within the City of London aforesaid and the circuit aforesaid or any of them for the curing of diseases as often as need should be required and to punish the said Physicians exercising the faculty of Physick in the premises Delinquents by Fines Amercements and Imprisonments of Body and other wayes reasonable and fitting according to the form and effect of the Letters Patents aforesaid and the Statutes aforesaid And the said Thomas Langton being President of the College aforesaid the aforesaid G. Turner Thomas Moundford Wil. Dun John Argent being likewise the 4 Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid The said Thomas Bonham before the time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606 abovesaid within London aforesaid that is to say in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid did practise Physick contrary to the form of the aforesaid Letters Patents and the Statutes aforesaid and the aforesaid Forbidding and Command of the aforesaid President and Censors And afterwards that is to say The same 20th day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. aforesaid The said Thomas Bonham at London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid was summoned by the aforesaid Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid at the College aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the 22d day of the said moneth of October upon the premises to be examined At which 22d day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid At the Assembly of the College aforesaid holden at the College aforesaid at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid afterwards that is to say the same 22d day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid before the said George Turner Wil. Dan Thomas Moundford and Joh. Argent then Censors Governours of the College aforesaid because that the said Thomas Bonham by the aforesaid Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid as it is said warned to appear at the College aforesaid before the President Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid the aforesaid 22d day of Octob. in the same day did not appear Then and there it was granted by the said Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid That the said Thomas Bonham for his dissobedience and contempts should be amerced to 10. pound And that the said Thomas Bonham for
the causes aforesaid should be arrested and delivered into custody And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden further say That afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 24th day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid The said Thomas Langton President of the College aforesaid at London in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid dyed After whose death and before the time in which c. That is to say the 25th day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid The said Henry Atkins a diligent man and skilful in the faculty of Physick and one of the Comminalty of the College aforesaid and one of the then 8. Electors of the College aforesaid then being at the College aforesaid within London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid was in due manner chosen and into the office of President of the College aforesaid for one whole yeer then next following and then and there held the said Office of President of the College aforesaid And the said Henry Atkins being President of the College aforesaid and the aforesaid George Turner William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent being Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid at an Assembly of the College aforesaid holden at the College aforesaid within London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the 7th day of November in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid before the aforesaid Henry Atkins then President of the College aforesaid and the aforesaid George Turner William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent then Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid came the aforesaid Thomas Bonham in his proper person Of which Thomas Bonham when the aforesaid Henry Atkins then President of the College and the aforesaid George Turner VVilliam Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent then Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid they asked whether he would satisfie to the College aforesaid for his disobedience and contempts aforesaid and again submit himself to be examined and to obey the Judgement of the College aforesaid And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham then and there answered that he before that had within London aforesaid done and practised and then after within Loedoâ— aforesaid would do and practise Physick no leave being asked of the said College and that he would not in any thing to the President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid yield obedience And then and there affirming the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours aforesaid to have no authority over those who are made Doctors in the University By which the said Censors or Governours for the offences and disobedience aforesaid Then and there Ordained and Decreed That the aforesaid Thomas Bonham should be sent to Prison there to remain until from thence by the President and Censors or Governours for the College aforesaid for the time being he should be delivered as by the said Letters Patents and the Statutes aforesaid it is Ordained and Established and then and there made their Warrant with the Common Seal of the College or Comminalty sealed And to the Keeper of of the Prison of the Lord the King in the Compter London in the Poultry in the Parish of St. Mildred directed commanded by the said Warrant to the Keeper of the Prison aforesaid That the said Keeper of the Prison aforesaid should receive the Body of the said Thomas Bonham and him in the Prison aforesaid of the said Lord the King there should safely keep without Bail or Main-prise at the proper costs and charges of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham until the aforesaid Thomas Bonham by the command of the President and Censors or Governours aforesaid or their Successors he should be delivered Which Thomas Bonham for his offences and disobedience aforesaid together with the Warrant aforesaid in form aforesaid made the said Henry Atkins then being President of the College aforesaid the aforesaid George Turner William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Taylor then being Censos or Governours of the College aforesaid by virtue of the Letters Patents and Statutes aforesaid and the aforesaid William Bowden and John Taylor as Servants of the said Henry Atkins President and of George William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent and by their the said President and 4. Censors or Governours aforesaid Warrant the aforesaid time in which c. to one Richard Ware then Keeper of the said Prison of the Lord the King of the Compter aforesaid at London in the Parish of St. Mildred in the Poultry in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid as to them it was lawful to do Which commitment of the aforesaid Thom. Bonham for the causes aforesaid in form aforesaid done is the same Trespass and Imprisonment whereof the aforesaid Tho. Bonham above complaineth And this they are ready to averr and demand Judgement if the said Thomas Bonham his Action aforesaid against them ought to have c. And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham saith That he for any thing before alleged to have his Action ought not to be barred Because by protestation he saith That he the said Thomas Bonham was not insufficient not was found by the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid to practise Physick nor unfitly or insufficiently to the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid in the Art of Physick did answer as the 〈◊〉 Henry Atkins George Turner John 〈…〉 dford John Argent John Taâ—lor and William Bowdâ—n above hath alleged For Pleâ— the said Thomas Bonham saith That by the aforesaid Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th holden at London aforesaid the aforesaid 5th day of April in the yeer of his Reign the 14th and from thence adjorned to VVestminster in the aforesaid County of Middlesex until the last day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said King the 15th and there then holden It was further Enacted by Authority of the same Parliament That whereas in the Diocesse out of London it was not then very like always to find men able sufficiently to examine according to the Statute such as should be admitted to exercise Physick in them That no person then after be suffered to exercise Physick through England until the said person should be examined at London by the aforesaid President and three of the aforesaid Electors and should have from the said President and Electors Letters Testimonials of their Approbation and Examination except he should be a Graduate of Oxford or Cambridge who had accomplished all things for his form without any Grace And further the said Thomas Bonham saith That he the said Thomas the second day of July in the year of our Lord 1595 in the University of Cambridge aforesaid took the Degree and Dignity of a Doctor in Physick and then and there that is to say the said second day of July in the
the 8th the 11th at Pettesâ—o aforesaid By her certain Writing of Release which the said Warden or Rector and Scholars with the Seal of the aforesaid Sibil sealed here in Court bring whose date is the same day and yeer remised released and altogether for her and her Heirs for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Linsey John Coteford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor then of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized in their full and peaceable possession then being their Heirs and Assignes for ever All her Right Claim Title Use Interest and Demand which ever she had now hath or at any time after might have of and in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances And further the said Sibil by her aforesaid Writing granted for her and her Heirs That she the said Sibil and her Heirs the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Richard Lyster Martin Linsey John Coteford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor their Heirs and Assignes against the then Abbot of Westminster and his Successors would warrant and for ever defend as by the said Writing of Release more fully appeareth And this the said Warden or Rector and Scholars are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement if the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain against the aforesaid Writing of Release the said Warranty of the said Sibil his Ancestor whose Heir the said Robert is in it contained his Action aforesaid against them ought to have c. And the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain saith that he for any thing before alleged to have his Action aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith That long before the aforesaid Deed and before the aforesaid Alured Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow had any thing in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances The aforesaid Richard Chamberlain was seized of the aforesaid Mannors with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee And the said Richard so thereof being seized before the gift aforesaid that is to say the 12th day of June in the yeer of the Lord Edward late King of England the 4th after the Conquest the 11th The aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Cornburgh Nicholas Stathum and William Collow out of the Court of the Chancery of the said late King Edward the 4th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex then being brought and prosecuted a certain Writ of the said late King Edward the 4th of Right against the said Richard Chamberlain then being Tenant of the Free hold of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenaces amongst other things to the then Sheriff of the County of Buckingham directed By which Writ the said late King then and there commanded the said Sherif That he should command the said Richard Chamberlain by the name of Richard Chamberlain Esq that justly and without delay he render to the said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William by the names of Richard Danvers Alured Gorneburgh Esq Nicholas Stathum and William Collow the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances 6. Messuages 200. Acres oâ— Land 20. Acres of Medow 200. Acres of Pasture 100. shillings Rent with the appurtenances in Pettesho Eckney Emberton which he claimeth to be his Right Inheritance And whereupon they complained Chamberlain them unjustly deforced and unlesse he do and the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William Collow should him the said Sheriâ— secure to prosecute their claim That then he summon by good summoners the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain that he be before the then Justices of the said late King Edward the 4th here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid from the 15. day of St. John the Baptist then nexâ— following to shew wherefore ye shoâ—ld not do And that he have then this summons and that Writ Because Thomas Rokes Esq Chief Lord of the same Fee remised thereof his Court to the said late King Edward the 4th At which 15. dayes of John the Baptist before Thomas Brian Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said late King Edward the 4th of the Bench here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid came aswell the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas Stathum and William Collow by Thomas Gurney their Attorny as the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain by John Wildstall then his Attorny And then the Sherif of the aforesaid County of Buckingham that is to say Reginald Gray Esq then there returned the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed and sent that the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and VVilliam Collow found to the said then Sherif sureties to prosecute his Writ aforesaid that is to say Richard Doo and Iohn Roo And that the said Richard Chamberlain was summoned by Iames Tye and Iohn Baker good summoners c. And hereupon The said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas Stathum and William Callow by the said Thomas Gurney their Attorney in the said Court of the aforesaid late King Edward the 4th of the Bench here that is to say at Wostminster aforesaid at the 15. dayes aforesaid of St. Iohn Baptist Declared against the said Richard Chamberlain of and upon their Writ aforesaid and upon their Writ aforesaid by the same Thomas Gurney demanded against the aforesaid Richard Chambrlain the Mannors Tenements Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified as their Right and inheritance by the aforesaid Writ of the said late King Edward the 4th because the aforesaid Thomas Rokes Chief Lord of the same Fee Released thereof his Court to the said late King And whereupon then they said That they themselves were seized of the Mannors aforesaid and of the Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the said late King Edward the 4th taking the profits therof to the value c. And that such is their Right then they did offer c. And the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain by the aforesaid John Wildstaâ—e by his Attorny came and defended the Right of the said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William when c. And their seisin of which seisin c. as of Fee and Right c. And all c. And chiefly of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified and then vouched hereof to warranty Robert King who was present in the same Court in his proper person and willingly the Mannors and Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified to them then did warrant c. Whereupon the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William then demanded against the aforesaid Robert Tenant by his warranty the Mannors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid in the said Writ of Right specified in form aforesaid c.
Humphry Lee Richard Westcot William Fairbrother Edward Faweet and Thomas Smith good and lawful men of the City aforesaid It is presented That whereas upon Saturday the 17th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. the 8th and of Scotland the 44th in the Court of the Lord the King before Richard Pyot Alderman then and as yet one of the Sherifs of the City of London aforesaid in his Compter situate in the Parish of St. Michael in VVoodstreet London aforesaid according to the Custom of the City aforesaid then holden one Robert Radford had leeved a certain Plaint upon a Plea of Debt of demand of 500. hundred pounds against one John Murray of London Esq The Tenor of which Plaint followeth in these words that is to say Iohn Murray summon against Robert Radford Salter in a Plea of Debt upon demand 500. hundred pounds And thereupon the aforesaid Robert Radford demanded processe against the said Iohn Murray according to the Custom of the City aforesaid to be seved Upon which at the Request of the said Robert Radford in this sort in the same Court it was proceeded That the aforesaid Richard â—yot then and yet one of the Sherifs of the City aforesaid To one Richard Fells then one of the Sergeants at Mace of the Sherif and Minister of the Court aforesaid by word of mouth according to the Custom of the City aforesaid Commanded that he the said Sergeant at Mace should take and arrest the aforesaid Iohn Murray by his Body if he should be found within the Liberties of the City aforesaid so as he have the Body of the said Iohn Murray at the next Court of the said Lord the King at the Guild-hall of the City aforesaid situate in the Parish of St. Lawrence in the Old Iury in the Ward of Cheap London aforesaid upon Wednesday the 21. day of November in the 8. and 44th aforesaid to be holden to answer the aforesaid Robert Radford in the Plea of his Plaint aforesaid By virtue of which Command The said Richard Fells The said Iohn Murray afterwards that is to say the 18th day of the said moneth of November in the said yeers of the Lord the King that now is the 8th and 44th abovesaid between the hour of 5. and 6. in the Afternoon of the same day At London aforesaid That is to say in the Parish of St. Martin Bowyer Row in the Ward of Farrington within London aforesaid in the Common Kings high Way there by his Body took and arrested and then and there had in his custody And the aforesaid Iohn Murrey so under the custody of the said Richard Fells by virtue of the Command aforesaid then and there as before is said being It so then and there happened That the said Iohn Murray late of London Esquire otherwise called John Murray of London Esquire one Iohn Mackall late of London Yeoman otherwise called Iohn Maokallay late of London Yeoman one Iohn Engles late of London Yeoman otherwise called Iohn English late of London Yeoman and one Archibald Miller late of London Yeoman not having the Fear of God before their eyes but moved and seduced by the instigation of the Devil with Force and Armes that is to say with Swords c. to the intent him the said Iohn Murray from his arrest aforesaid then and there to rescous in and upon the aforesaid Richard Fells then there made an assault affray in which said affray The aforesaid Iohn Mackall otherwise called Iohn Mackalley with a sword is called a Rapier made of Iron and Steel of the value of 12. pence wherehe the said Iohn Mackall otherwise called Iohn Mackalley in his right hand then and there had and held the said Richard Fells in and upon the left part of his Body under the left shoulder-blade of the said Richard feloniously voluntarily and of malice forethought then and there struck and thrust in giving to the said Richard Fells then and there with the sword aforesaid called a Rapier in and upon the left part of his Body under the left shoulder one blow and wound mortal of the length of half an Inch and of bredth of half an Inch and of depth 6. Inches of which said stroak and mortal wound aforesaid the aforesaid Richard Fells then and there that is to say in the Parish and Ward last aforesaid presently dyed And further The Jurors aforesaid present That the aforesaid John Murray late of London Esquire otherwise called John Murry late of London Esquire The aforesaid John Engles late of London Yeoman otherwise called John English late of London Yeoman and the aforesaid Archibald Miller late of London Yeoman the said 18th day of November in the yeers 8th and 44th abovesaid between the Hours aforesaid in the Parish Ward and place last aforesaid felonionly voluntarily and of their forethought malice were present fighting procuring helping abetting and comforting the aforesaid John Mackall late of London Yeoman otherwise called John Mackalley late of London Yeoman to the aforesaid Richard Fells in manner and form aforesaid to be killed and murthered And so the Jurors aforesaid say That the aforesaid John Mackall late of London Yeoman otherwise called John Mackalley late of London Yeoman John Murray late of London Esquire otherwise called John Murry late of London Esquire John Engles late of London Yeoman otherwise called John English late of London Yeoman and Archibald Miller late of London Yeoman the aforesaid Richard Fells at London aforesaid that is to say in the Parish and Ward last aforesaid feloniously voluntarily and of their forethought malice in manner aforesaid killed and murthered against the peace of the Lord the King that now is his Crown and dignity c. And upon this at the self same Sessions before the aforesaid Justices the aforesaid John Murray otherwise Murry John Mackal otherwise Mackalley Io. Engles otherwise English Archibald Miller in the Custody of the said Richard Pyot and Francis Jones Sherifs of the City aforesaid being in the Gaol of Newgate aforesaid to the barr there brought in their proper persons came and severally being asked how of the Felony and Murther aforesaid they would acquit themselves Every one of them for himself severally said that he is not thereof guilty And thereof for good and ill severally put himself upon the Country And Richard Langley Esq who in this behalf followeth for the Lord the King likewise Therefore immediatly came a Jury thereof and the Jurors of that Jury by the Sherifs aforesaid of the City aforesaid Impannelled being called that is to say VVil. Morgan Tho. Dalbit Tho. Evans Tho. Austin Solomon Green VVil. Chewn VVilliam Ellil Metcalse Allington Iohn Drake VVil. Taylor Owen Dames and Tho. Damport appeared who to speak the truth of and upon the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the City of London is and all
mentioned of which wound the said Richard Fells then and there that is to say in the Parish and Ward last aforesaid instantly dyed And futher the Jurors aforesaid say That at the time of the Killing of the aforesaid Rich. Fells in maner and form aforesaid The said Jo. Murray and John Engles otherwise English were present aiding to the said John Mackall otherwise Mackalley to him the said Richard Fells in manner aforesaid to be killed But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found The killing aforesaid of the said Richard Fells in form aforesaid don be Murther or not the Jurors aforesaid do not know And thereof demand the Advise of the Justices and Court here and if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid killing of the aforesaid Richard Fells be Murder Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Murray John Mackally and Iohn English are guilty and every one of them is guilty of the Murder of the said Richard Fells in manner and form as by the Indictment aforesaid against them it is supposed And that they at the time of Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid committed had no Goods or Chattels Lands or Tenements to the knowledge of the Jurors aforesaid And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid killing of the aforesaid Richard Fells in form aforesaid committed be not Murder Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles are not guilty nor any of them is guilty of the Murther of the aforesaid Richard Fells as they have alleged nor for that occasion ever with-drew themselves or any of them with-drew himself And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form foresaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the killing of the aforesaid Richard Fells in form aforesaid done be Fellony or Man-slaughter Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles are guilty and every of them is guilty of the Felony and Man-slaughter aforesaid And that they have no goodâ— nor Chattels Lands or Tenements And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Archibald Miller in the said Indictment named of the Felony and Murder aforesaid is not guilty nor for that occasion ever with-drew himself Therefore it is considered by the Court That the aforesaid Archibald Miller go thereof acquitted without day c. And because the Court here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises concerning the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles are not yet avised Day is given to the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles until the next Sessions of Gaol Delivery aforesaid for the aforesaid City to be holden under the Custody of the aforesaid Sherifs in the mean while committed safely to be kept for to hear their Judgement thereof c. And because the Justices aforesaid are not yet c. Indictments The Record of the Conviction of Carliel and others The Lord Sanchars Case C. 9. part fol. 114. THE Inquisition taken at the Sessions of the Peace of the Lord the King for the City of London at the Guild-hall of the City of London aforesaid upon VVednesday the 27th day of May In the yeer of the Reign of our Lord Iames by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. the 10th and of Scotland the 45th before James Pemberton Knight Mayor of the City of London aforesaid Stephen Soan Knight John Garrad Knight Thomas Bennet Knight Thomas Low Knight Henry Row Knight and Henry Mountague Knight one of the Sergeants at Law of the Lord the King and Recorder of the said City Justices of the said Lord the King to the Peace in the City aforesaid to be kept As also to divers Felonies Trespasses and misdeeds in the said City committed to hear determine assigned by the oaths of William Palmer John Pemberton Edward Bishop John Harrison William Erbury Thomas Nicholson Humphry VVaterson John Woodhall Zachary Healing Richard Downes Thomas Eagles Thomas Dennis Richard Taylor Meredith â—roughton and Ralph Hanson good and lawful men of the Body of the City aforesaid Who say upon their Oath aforesaid That Robert Carliel late of London Yeoman and John Jrweng late of London aforesaid Yeoman Not having God before their Eyes but moved and seduced by the Instigation of the Devil The 11th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 45th at London aforesaid that is to say in the Parish of St. Dunston in the East in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid with force and Armes c. Feloniously on their fore though Malice in and upon one John Turner then and there being in the Peace of God and of the said Lord the King made an assault and an affray And the aforesaid Robert Carliel a certain Gun called a Pistol of the value of 5. shillings then and there charged with Gunpowder and one leaden Bullet which Gun the aforesaid Robert Carliel in his Right Hand then and there had and held in and upon the aforesaid John Turner then and there Feloniously voluntarily and of his fore-thought Malice did shoot off and discharge And the aforesaid Robert Carliel with the leaden Bullet aforesaid from the Gun aforesaid then and there sent out the aforesaid John Turner in and upon the Left part of the Body of him the said John Turner neer the Left Papp of the said John Turner then and there feloniously struck giving to the said John Turner then and there with the leaden Bullet aforesaid out of the Gun aforesaid then and there sent out in and upon the aforesaid Left part of the Body of the said Iohn Turner neer the aforesaid Left Papp of the said Iohn Turner one mortal Wound of the Bâ—edth of half of one Inch and in the Depth of 5. Inches of which mortal Wound the aforesaid Iohn Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid instantly dyed And that Iames Irweng Feloniously and of his fore-thought Malice then and there was present adjoyning assisting abbetting comforting and maintaining the aforesaid Robert Carliel to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid Feloniously to be done and committed And so the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oath aforesaid say That the aforesaid â—obert Carliel and Iames Irweng the aforesaid Iohn Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid Feloniously Voluntarily and of their fore-thought Malice did kill and murder contrary to the Peace of the Lord the King that now is his Crown
and Dignity c. And afterwards That is to say at the Gaol Delivery of the Lord the King at Newgate holden by the City of London aforesaid at the Justice Hall situate in the Old Baly in the Parish of St. Sepulcher in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid the 23d day of Iune in the yeer of the Reign of the said our Lord Iames by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland the 10th and of Scotland the 45th before Iames Pemberton Knight Mayor of the City of London aforesaid The right Reverend Father in God Iohn Bishop of London Thomas Flemming Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Edward Coke Kt. Chief Justice of the said Lord the King of the Bench Lawrence Tanfeild Knight Chief Baron of the Exchequer of the Lord the King Christopher Yelverton Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned David Williams Knight another of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned John Croke Knight another of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas to be holden before the King himself to be holden assigned Stephen Soan Knight John Garrard Knight Thomas Bennet Knight Baptist Hicks Knight Francis Bacon Solicitor General of the Lord the King Henry Mountague Knight one of the Kings Serjeants at Law and Recorder of the City of London aforesaid and other their Fellows Justices of the Lord the King To his Gaol aforesaid of Prisoners in the same being to be delivered assigned The aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng under the custody of Edward Barkham and George Smythes Sherifs of the City aforesaid to the Barr aforesaid brought in their proper persons came and severally being asked how of the Felony and Murder aforesaid they would acquit themselves The said Robert Carliel saith That he cannot deny but that he is guilty of the Felony and Murder aforesaid to him in form aforesaid imposed and the Felony and Murder aforesaid expresly confesseth and thereof putteth himself upon the Mercy of the King and the aforesaid James Irweng saith That he of the Felony and Murder aforesaid to him in form aforesaid imposed is not guilty and thereof for good and ill puts himself upon the Country Therefore immediately he cause a Jury to come c. And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid by the aforesaid Sherifs of the City aforesaid to this impannelled being called that is to say Humphry Slâ—cy William Morgan Rouland Healing Hugh Hawesh Henry Colthurst William Hicks William Hayes Richard Bridges William Wilde John Palmer Solomon Green and Richard Rudd came who to say the truth of and upon the premises to the said Iames Irweng imposed chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Irweng is guilty of the Felony and Murder to him in form aforesaid imposed in manner and form as by the indictment aforesaid against them it is supposed And that he the time of the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid committed or ever after had no Goods or Chattels Lands or Tenements to the knowledge of the Jurors aforesaid Upon which the said Robert Carliel and Iames Irweng being severally spoken unto If they had any thing for themselves or could say Wherefore the Court aforesaid to Judgement and Execution of them and either of them of the premises ought not to proceed who said nothing but what at first they had said Upon which then and there It is considered by the said Justices That the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng to the Gaol of Newgate aforesaid from whence they came should be sent back and thence be lead and either of them be lead unto the place of Execution and there be hanged and either of them be hanged until c. The Indictment of Robert Creighton Esq THE Jurors present for the Lord the King upon their Oath That Middle whereas Robert Carliel late of London Yeoman and James Irweng late of London Yeoman Not having God before their Eyes but seduced by the instigation of the Devil the 11th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 45th at London that is to say in the Parish of St. Dunston in the West in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid c. with Force and Armes c. Feloniously and of their fore-thought Malice in and upon one John Turner then and there in the Peace of God and of the said Lord the King being made an Aassult and Affray And the aforesaid Robert Carliel a certain Gun called a Pistoll of the value of 5. shillings then and there charged with Gunpowder and one leaden Bullet which Gun the said Robert Carliel in his Right Hand then and there had and held in and upon the aforesaid John Turner then and there Feloniously Voluntarily and of his Malice fore-thought did shoot off and discharge And the aforesaid Robert Carliel with the leaden Bullet aforesaid from the Gun aforesaid then and there sent out the aforesaid Iohn Turner in and upon the left part of the Body of him the said Iohn Turner then and there feloniously struck giving to the said Iohn Turner then and there with the leaden Bullet aforesaid neer the left papp of him the said Iohn Turner one mortal Wound of the Breadth of half an inch and Depth of 5. inches of which mortal Wound the aforesaid Iohn Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid instantly dyed And that James Irweng Feloniously and of his fore-thought Malice then and there was present ayding assisting abetting comforting and maintaining the aforesaid Robert Carliel to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid to be done and committed And so the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irwenge the aforesaid John Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid Feloniously Voluntarily and of their fore-thought Malice killed and Murdered against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is his Crown and Dignity one Robert Creighton late of the Parish of St. Margaret in the County of VVestminster Esquire not having God before his Eyes but being seduced by the Instigâ—tion of the Devil before the Felony and Murder aforesaid by the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng in manner and form aforesaid done and committed that is to say the 10th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith the 10th and of Scotland the 45th the aforesaid Robert Carliel at the aforesaid Parish of St. Margaret in Westminster aforesaid in the County of Middlesex aforesaid to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid done
and committed Malitiously Feloniously Voluntarily and of his fore-thought Malice did stir up abet counsel and procure against the Peace of the said Lord the King that now is his Crown and Dignity c. By Indictments Trinitat 10. of King James Information In the remembrances of the Exchequer of the 34 th yeer of Queen Elizabeth that is to say Amongst the Records of the Term of St. Hillary in the year aforesaid Rot 149. remaining in the Exchequer in the Custody of the Queens Remembrancer there amongst other things it is contained thus Porters Case C. 1. part fol. 16. b. MEmorandum That John Popham Esquire the Queens Attorny General Lond. ss who followeth for the Lady the Queen being present in this Court the 3d. day of February for the Queen gave the Court to understand and be informed That whereas All that the Key and Wharf called the Old Woolkey and all Messuages Buildings Lands Advantages Commodities and Profits to the same any way belonging or appertaining situate and being in the Parish of All Saints Barking in the City of London in the hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 26â—h day of Ianuary in the year of her Reign the 34th and long before were and stood and of Right ought to be as in the Right of her Crown of England as in very many Records Rolls and Remembrances of this Exchequer it more fully appeareth of Record Yet one Iohn Porter Fishmonger and Henry Cockain the Lawes of the said Lady the Queen that now is little regarding but indending the dissenherisin of the Lady the Queen in the premises with Force and Armes c. the aforesaid 26th day of January in the 34th yeer aforesaid in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Premises Entred Intruded and made Entry And the issues and profits thereof arising took and had to their own uses and dâ— yet take and have the Trespasse aforesaid hitherto and yet continuing in contempt of the said Lady the Queen and contrary to her Lawes Whereupon the aforesaid Attorny General of the said Lady the Quen that now is for the said Lady the Queen prayeth the advise of the Court in the premises And that the aforesaid Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain come here to answer the said Lady the Queen in the premises Upon which c And the aforesaid Sherifs of the said City of London that they attatch the said John and Henry in form aforesaid so as c. in 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary the Virgin this Term Before which day that is to say the 4th day of February The aforesaid John Porter here in Court found and of the premises by the Barons here be spoken to of the premises is committed to the Prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to stay until c. And presently the same day brought hither to the bar by the Warden of the Prison aforesaid by favour of the Court was let to bail to Henry Cockain of the Parish of All Saints Barking and Robert Dodd of the Parish of St. Buttolph without Algate London that is to say to every of them Body for Body untill the next day and so from day to day and from Term to Term untill c. By Colour of which Bail the said John Porter from the Prison aforesaid is delivered And thereupon came then here the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain that is to say the said Iohn Porter in his proper person and the aforesaid Henry Cockain by Arthur Salway his Attorny specially admitted by the favour of the Court. And pray c. the hearing of the Information aforesaid And it is read unto them Which being read and by them understood The said Iohn Porter and Henry complain them to be by colour of the premises in the Information specified to be grievously troubled and inquieted and that not justly For taking it by Protestation that the Information aforesaid and the matter in the same contaned is not sufficient in Law To which they have not necessity by the Law of the Land to Answer Yet for Plea as to the Force and Armes and what is contrary to the Peace of the said Lady the Queen or in contempt of the said Lady the Queen The said John Porter and Henry say in nothing thereof they are guilty nor any of them is guilty And of this they put themselves upon the Country And the aforesaid Attorny General likewise and as to the Entry Intrusion and ingresse in all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf called the Old Woolkey and the aforesaid Messuages Buildings and other premises with the appurtenances in the Information above specified supposed to be done The said John Porter and Henry say That the said Lady the Queen that now is them the the said Iohn Porter and Henry or any of them thereof ought not to trouble Because they say That long before the aforesaid 26th day of January in the said Information mentioned One the Lady Avice â—nevet Widow late the Wife of Nicholas Gibson of London Grocer was seized of and in all that aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances in the said Information specified in her demesn as of Fee And so being seised The said Lady Avice before the time in which it is supposed the Entry Intrusion and Ingresse to be done that is to say the 13th day of April in the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the Sixth at London in the Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid in the Ward of the Tower of London Demised all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances to one Bartholmew Gibbs To have to him and his Assignes from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord in the yeer of our Lord 1566. from thence next insuing unto the end and Term of 40. yeers from thence next following and fully to be ended By virtuâ— of which Demise the aforesaid Bartholmew after the aforesaid Feast of the Birth of our Lord in the aforesaid yeer of our Lord 1566. and before the aforesaid time in which c. entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed The said Bartholmew before the time in which c. that is to say the First Day of January in the yeer of our Lord 1552. at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid made his Testament and Last Will in Writing and of the same his Testament and Last Will made and constituted one Alice his then Wife his Executrix And afterwards the said Bartholmew the same Day and Yeer there dyed of all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances possessed After whose Death and before the time in which c. the same Alice taking upon her the Charge and Execution of the Testament and Last Will aforesaid in all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with
the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed The same Alice before the time in which c. that is to say the 4th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the late Queen Mary the First at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid took to Husband one Thomas Wilcox by which the said Thomas and Alice in the right of the said Alice were of all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and of other the premises with their appurtenances possessed And so thereof being possessed The said Thomas Wilcox and Alice before the time in which that is to say the 16th day of November in the yeers of the Reign of the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King and Queen of England the First and Second at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by their Writing sealed with their seals and here into Court brought whose Date is the same Day and Yeer Gave and Granted all their Right Title Interest and Term of Yeers which they the said Thomas and Alice then had to come of and in all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and the rest of the premises aforesaid with their appurtenances by reason of the execution of the Testament of the aforesaid Bartholmew Gibbs aforesaid to one Iohn Haynes By virtue of which Gift and Grant The same John Haynes before the time in which c. into all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed so being thereof possessed the said I. Haynes before the time in which c. that is say the 21. Day of Decem. in the Yeer of our Lord 1559. at Lond. aforesaid in the Parish aforesaid made his Test Last Will in Writing by the same devised and bequeathed the premises to one Joice then his Wife and thereof made and constituted c. Joice then his Wife his Executrix and afterwards the same Day and Yeer there of all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances dyed possessed After whose Death and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Joice taking upon her the Charge of Execution of the Testament and will of the aforesaid John Haynes into all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed by virtue of Execution of the same Testament and Last Will of the aforesaid Iohn Haynes and so being thereof possessed the said Joice before the time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31. at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid John Porter By which the said John Porter was and yet is thereof possessed By Colour of which the same John Porter in his own Right and the aforesaid Henry Cockain as Servant of the said Iohn and by his Commandment unto all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances in the said Information specified the said time in which c. Entred and the Issues and Profits thereof by the whole time in the said Information specified took and had and do yet take and have as to them it was and is lawful Without that that the said Iohn Porter in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the aforesaid Key and Wharf with the appurtenances in the said Information mentioned or any part thereof intruded or either of them did intrude in manner and form as in the said Information above is supposed And without that that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances in the said Information mentioned or any parcel thereof the said 26th Day of Ianuary in the Yeer 34th aforesaid in the same Information mentioned or ever before or after stood or were or was in the Hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is in manner and form as in the said Information is before supposed And also without that that there is any Record Roul or Remembrance in the Court of the Exchequer here besides the Record of the Information aforesaid by which it may appear the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises or any parcel thereof with the appurtenances to be or of Right to be in the hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is All and singular which the said John Porter and Henry Cockain are ready to aver as the Court here c. Whereupon they pray Judgement and that they as to the premises from this Court be dismissed c. and each of them be dismissed And because the Court will avise of the Plea aforesaid until further c. Day is given here to the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain in the same state as now it is until to 15. Dayes of Faster at which Day the aforesaid Iohn and Henry came here as before And the aforesaid Iohn Popham Esquire Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is and who followes for the said Lady the Queen present here in Court the same Day in his proper Person By Protestation not acknowleging any thing in the Plea of the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain by them before pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in the Plea of the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain by them above pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in their Plea aforesaid above have pleaded Yet for Replication The same Attorny of the said Lady the Queen that now is for the said Lady the Queen saith as he formerly said That the aforesaid Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is in the aforesaid Key and Wharf called the Old Woolkey and other the premises in the Information aforesaid specified entred intruded and made entry in manner and form as in the Information aforesaid above it is alleged And of this The Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayeth that it may be inquired of the Country And the said Desendants say as before and pray likewise Therefore that inquiry be made thereof c. And it is commanded to the Sherifs of London that they do not omit c. And that they cause to be here from Easter in one Moneth the same Term 12. free and lawful men of our Balywick of the Neighbourhood of the Parish of All Saints Barking in the City of London aforesaid c. whereof each c. by whom c. and who neither c. And the same Day is given here to the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain at which day the said Iohn and Henry come here as before and the Sherifs that is to say William Rider and Benedict Burnham returned the Writ aforesaid together
and in the 22d year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord King Henry the 8th as by the said Will more fully appeareth And afterwards the said Nicholas Gibson at London in the Parish of St. Dunstan in the East aforesaid the 6th Day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Henry late King of England the 8th the 32th aforesaid dyed of such his estate so seized of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with appurtenances without issue of his â—ody begotten After the death of which Nicholas The aforesaid Avice in the aforesaid Parish of St. Dunstan took upon her the charge of Execution of the Testament aforesaid And before the aforesaid time of Intrusion aforesaid supposed that is to say the 13th Day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th the third At London in the Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid demised the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to one Bartholmew Gibbs To have and to hold to him and his Assignes from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord which then should be in the yeer of our Lord 1566. until the full end of 40. yeers from thence next following and fully ended By virtue of which demise The same Bartholmew was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid possessed and so thereof being possessed The said Bartholmew before the time in which c. that is to say the first Day of January in the yeer of our Lord 1522. at London in the Parish of All Saints aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing and constituted and ordained one Alice then his Wife his Executrix of his said last Will and Testament And afterwards the said Bartholmew then and there dyed of such his estate possessed of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances After whose death and before the time in which c. the said Alice took upon her tharge of the Execution of the Testament aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of All Saints and was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid of 40. yeers possessed as Executrix of the Testament of the said â—artholmew and so thereof being possessed The said Alice Before the time in which c. at London in the Parish of All Saints aforesaid took to Husband one Thomas Wilcox By which The said Thomas and Alice before the time in which c. were of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. yeers of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and the said Thomas and Alice so thereof being possessed before the time in which c. that is say the 16th Day of December in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady Mary late Queen of England the second At London in Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid granted all their Estate Interest and Term of years which they then had of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to one Iohn Haynes By virtue of which Grant The said Iohn Haynes was of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. yeers of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed And so thereof being possessed The same Iohn Haynes before the time in which c. that is to say the 21. Day of September in the yeer of our Lord 1559. at London in the Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing made ordained one Joyce his then Wife his Executrix of hiâ— said last Will and by the same his Will willed and bequeathed all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he then had of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Joyce And afterwards the said Iohn Haynes at London in the Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid of such his Estate of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances dyed possessed After whose Death the said Joyce took upon her the charge of the Execution of the Testament aforesaid and was of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. yeers of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed And so thereof being possessed the said Joyce before the time in which c. At London in the Parish of All Saints aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid Iohn Porter By which the said Iohn Porter and Joyce were of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. years of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath That one Iohn Gibson is Cosen and Heir of the said Nicholas Gibson that is to say Son and Heir of Hugh Gibson deceased Brother and Heir of the said Nicholas Gibson And that the said Iohn Gibson before the time in which c. that is to say the 24th Day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 34th into the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by force of the Testament and last Will of the said Nicholas Gibson by colour of Forfeiture and by reason of the Condition in the said last Will before specified by the aforesaid Avice in her life forfeited and broken entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said John Gibson before the time in which c. that is to say the 25th Day of Janbary in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 34th By his Writing indented bearing Date the same Day and yeer in the Court of the said Lady the Queen of her Chancery at Westminster being in due manner inrolled and to the Jurors in Evidence shewed Bargained Granted and Sold the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Lady the Queen that now is To have and to hold to the said Lady the Queen that now is her Heirs and Successors for ever By Colour of which Grant Bargain Sale and Inrollement The said Lady the Queen that now is was of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances seized in her Demesn as of Fee in the Right of the Crown of England and the said Queen that now is so thereof being seized The aforesaid John Porter claiming the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid in his own Right and the aforesaid Henry as Servant of the said John Porter and by his Commandment the aforesaid time in which c. into the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is thereof entred and made ingresse But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by them the Jurors in form aforesaid found the aforesaid entry of the aforesaid John Porter and Henry into the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances be an Intrusion upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid or not The said Jurors thereof pray the
Memorandum That Edward Coke Esquire The Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is who prosecutes for the said Lady the Queen present here in Court the 20th Day of June this Term in his own person for the said Lady the Queen gave the Court here to understand and be informed That whereas a Wood with the appurtenances called Alcon otherwise Aluington Wood containing by estimation 3000. Acres of Wood in Alton otherwise Aluington and Rock in the aforesaid County of Worcester in the Hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is the first Day of October in the first yeer of her Reign and long before and continually after were and stood and of Right ought to be and yet ought as in the Right of her â—rown of England as in very many Records Roules and Remembrances of this Exchequer it is evident and appeareth upon Record Yet one Ann Countess of Warwick Humphry Hill Richard Bushopp and Edward Bushopp little regarding the Lawes and Statutes of the said Lady the Queen that now is but intending the Disenherism of the Lady the Queen in the premises with Force and Armes c. the first Day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27th and diverse Dayes and turns between the same first Day of October in the 27th yeer and the Day of Exhibiting of this Information in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the premises Entred Intruded and made Entry and the Issues and Profits thereof coming perceived to their own uses and had and as yet do perceive and have the same Trespass continuing and as yet continuing in contempt of the said Lady the Queen that now is and against her Lawes Whereupon the aforesaid Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayes the Advise of the Courâ— in the premises And the aforesaid Ann Countess of Warwick Humphry Hâ—ll Richard Bishopp and Edward Bishopp come here to answer the said Lady the Queen of and in the premises as it is contained there And now that is to say From the day of Holy Trinity in three Weekes this Term came here the aforesaid Richard Bishopp by Arthur Salwaie his Attorny to this by special favour of the Court admitted and prayeth the hearing of the Information aforesaid and it is read unto him c. Which being read and heard and by him the said Richard fully understood The said Richard complaineth by colour of the premises in the Information aforesaid above specified to be troubled and unquietted and that not justly Because By Protestation that the Information aforesaid and matter in the same contained is not sufficient in Law and to which the said Richard is not necessitated nor by the Law of the Land bound to answer in any manner By Protestation also That the Wood aforesaid in the Information aforesaid above mentioned doth not contain nor the aforesaid time of the Trespass and Intrusion aforesaid above supposed to be done did contain in it 3000. Acres in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid above is supposeed Yet for Plea The said Richard as to the Force and Armes or whatsoever is against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is As also the whole Trespass Contempt and Intrusion in the Information aforesaid above specâ—fied supposed to be done besides the Entry and Ingresse into the Wood aforesaid called Alton Wood otherwise Alvington Wood the 21th Day of February in the Yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 32th and from the same Day until the Day of Exhibiting of the Information aforesaid and besides the perceiving the Issues and Profits thereof by that time comming above supposed The said Richard saith that he in nothing thereof is guilty in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid above is supposed and upon this puts himself upon the Country And the aforesaid Attorny General of the said Lady the Queen that now is who for the said Lady the Queen in this behalf prosecutes likewise c. Therefore an Inquisition be made thereof c. And as to the Entry and Ingress into the Wood aforesaid the aforesaid 21th Day of February in the 32th Yeer aforesaid and from that Day until the Day of Exhibiting of the Information aforesaid as also to the taking of the Issues and Profits thereof by the time thereof comming above supposed to be done the said Richard saith That the said Lady the Queen that now is him the said Richard ought not any wayes to impeach or trouble because he saith That long before the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the Entry Intrusion and Ingress aforesaid to be done One Ann Countess of Warwick Widow sometimes Wife of Richard sometimes Earl of Warwick was seized of the Mannor of Abbotesley otherwise Abberley otherwise Abbedeley with the appurtenances in the aforesaid County of Worcester whereof the aforesaid Wood in which c. then and until the time of the grant here after specified made to Robert Earl of Leicester the third Day of July in the 30th Yeer of Queen Elizabeth here after mentioned whereof the Memory of Man then was not to the contrary was parcel in her Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized a Fine was levied in the Court of the Lord Henry late King of England the 7th at Westminst in the County â—f Middlesex from the Day of St. Hillary in 15. Dayes in the 3d Year of his Reign before Thomas Brian Roger Townsend and Iohn Haugh Justices and other the said late Kings Faithful Subjects then there present Betwâ—en him the Lord the King plantiff and the aforesaid Ann sometimes Countess sometimes Wife of the aforesaid Richard Earl of Warwick by the Name of Ann Countess of Warwick deforceant of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other c. whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the same Court that is to say That the said Countess granted to the said Lord the King the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And the same rendred back to him in the same Court To have and to hold to the said Lord the King and the Heirs Males of his Body begotten and if it shall happen That the said Lord the King should die without Heir Male of his Body begotten then after the decease of the said Lord the King the aforesaid Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. should wholly Revert to the same Countess and her Heirs quieted from the other Heirs of the aforesaid Lord the King as by the Record of the aforesaid Fine in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench at Westminster aforesaid remaining more fully appeareth By virtue of which Fine the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as Fee tail that
said Indenture The said Earl of Warwick his Heirs and Assigns and every of them should stand and be seised of and in the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things by the names of Alton Woods otherwise Alvington Woods with the appurtenances siâ—uâ—te and being within the Parish of Rock or elsewhere within the several Counties of Worcester and Salop or any or either of them to the uses 〈…〉 nts and purposes afterwards in the said Indenture expressed and declared that is to say To the use of him the said Ambrose Earl of Warwick for the Term of his life without impeachment of any wast and after the decease of him the said Earl of Warwick to the use of the aforesaid Ann Countess of Warwick in the Information aforesaid named by the name of the Lady Ann Countess of Warwick wife of him the said Earl of Warwick and the right Heirs of the said Ann for ever By colour of which Covenant and Grant aforesaid and by force of a certain Act of transferring of uses into possessions in the Parliament of the aforesaid Lord Henry late King of England the 8th Father of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th holden made and provided The aforesaid Ambrose Earl of Warwick was seised of the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things in his demesn as of Freehold during his life without impeachment of waste the remainder thereof after the decease of him the said Earl of Warwick to the aforesaid Ann late Countess of Warwick and her Heirs expectant And the said Ambrose Earl of Warwick so thereof being seised the remainder thereof in form aforesaâ—d expectant The said Eaâ—l afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 21th day of February in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 32th aforesaid at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed after whose death the said Ann now Countess of Warwick into the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was and yet is thereof seised in her demesn as of Fee by colour and force of the premises By which the said Richard Bushopp as servant unto the aforesaid Ann now Countess of Warwick and by her Command the aforesaid 21th day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th aforesaid and the dayes and times aforesaid betwixt the same 21th day of February in the year 32th aforesaid and the day of the exhibiting of the Information aforesaid into the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and the Issues and Profits thereof by that time arising to the use of the said Ann now Countess of Warwick took and had and doth yet take and have as it was and is lawful for him to do And the aforesaid Richard further saith That the aforesaid William Walshe yet over-liveth and is in full life that is to say at Abbottesly aforesaid without that that the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances or any parcel thereof in the Hands and Possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is is or before this was or of Right ought to be in manner and form as in by the Information aforesaid it is supposed And without that that the said Richard Bushopp in or upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances or any part thereof Entred Intruded or made Ingresse in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid it is supposed and without that that there is any Record Roll or Remembrance besides the Record of the Information aforesaid by which it may appear that the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Information above specified or any parcel thereof in the Hands and Possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is or standeth or of Right ought to be or stand in manner and form as in the Information aforesaid above is supposed All and singular which the said Richard Bushopp is ready to aver as unto the Court c. Whereupon he prayeth Judgement and that he as to the premises from this Court be dismissed And because the Court here â—â— avise of the Plea aforesaid before that further c. Day is given unto the â—fores Rich. Bushopp in state as now until 8. dayes of St. Michael At which day the said Richard Bushopp came here as before And the said Attorny General of the said Lady the Queen that now is who for the said Lady the Queen prosecutes present here in Court in his proper person for his said Lady the Queen by Protestation not acknowledging any thing in the Plea aforesaid of the said Richard Bushopp by him above pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Richard in his Plea aforesaid above hath pleaded Yet for Reply the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the same Lady the Queen saith That the Plea of the Richard Bushopp as to the Entry Intrusion and ingresse aforesaid in the aforesaid Wood by him the said Richard in the Information aforesaid to be done supposed is not sufficient in Law to discharge the said Richard of the said Entry Intrusion and ingresse whereupon for default of sufficient Answer in this behalf The said Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayeth Judgement And that the aforesaid Richard of the same Entry Intrusion and Ingresse by the aforesaid Richard thereof supposed to be done be convicted And the said Richard saith That he sufficient matter in Law to barr the said Lady the Queen that now is from the possession of the aforesaid Wood in the said Information specified and of every parcel thereof above in barr and exclusion of the Information hath alleged which he is ready to averr as unto the Court c. Which matter aforesaid The Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the same Queen doth not deny nor to the same any wayes for the said Lady the Queen Answereth but the Averment aforesaid to admit altogether doth refuse Wherefore as before the said Richard demandeth Judgement and that he as to the Premises from this Court be dismissed c. And because the Barons here will avise themselves of upon the Premises whereof the aforesaid Richard hath above put himself in Judgement of the Court before that they give Juâ—gement thereof Further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Barons thereof not yet c. And as to the Tryal of the Issue aforesaid by the Country to be tryed above joyned It is commanded to the Sherif of the aforesaid County of Worcester that he do not omit c. And that he cause to be here at the said 8. dayes of St. Michael 12. good and lawful Men of the Neighbourhood of Alton otherwise Alvington and Rock in the said County whereof each c
of her Exchequer Greeting Because in the Record and process and also in giving of Judgement in the plaint wch was in our Court before you the aforesaid Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid in the yeers of our Reign the 37th By Bil between us and Richard Bushopp of certain trespasses and intrusions in certain of our Woods with the appurtenances called Alton otherwise Aluington Woods conteyning by estimation 3000 Acres of Wood manifest Error hath entervened to our great damage And whereas in the statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. our progenitor at Westminster and in the year of his Reign the 31th holden made amongst other things It is agreed and established that in all cases the King or other persons touching where any one complaineth of Error made in the process in the Exhequer The Chancellor and Tresurer cause to come before them in some Chamber of Counsel nigh to the Exchequer the Record of the process of the same out of the Exchequer and taking to them the Justices and such like sages as to them shall seem fit to be taken They cause to be called before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid to hear their Informations and the causes of their Judgement and the business thereupon to be duly examined And if any Error was found the same to be corrected and the Rolls to be amended and afterwards them in the said Exchequer to do execution thereof to be remitted as belongeth as in the said Statute it is conteyned We therefore willing Errors if any such were according to the form of the statute aforesaid to be corrected and speedy Justice to be done in that behalf Command you that if Judgement thereof be given then the Record and process aforesaid with alll things concerning the same before our beloved faithful Counsellor Tho. Egerton Kt. keeper of our great Seal of England and how the aforesaid Tresurer in the Councel Chamber next to the Enchequer aforesaid called the Councel Chamber upon Tuesday that is to say the 21th day of the moneth of April you cause to come And to the same Keeper of our great Seal and you the aforesaid Tresurer the Record being seen and examined and the process aforesaid and your informations being heard and you the aforesaid Barons further in this part with the Councel of the Justices and other sages aforesaid Cause to be done what of right and according to the form of the Statute was to be done Witnesse my self at Westminster the 11th day of April in the yeer of our Reign the 39th Symons At the said 29th day of the said Moneth of April the aforesaid Worthy Man Thomas Egerton Kt. Keeper of the great Seal of England and VVilliam Lord Burghley Lord Tresurer of England caused to come before them the Record aforesaid in the aforesaid Chamber next to the Exchequer aforesaid called the Councel Chamber and at the said day and place came before the Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Tresurer the aforesaid Atorney General of the Lady the Queen and for the said Lady the Queen said that in the Record and process aforesaid and in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid of and upon the aforesaid demurrer in Law it is diversly Erred that is to say that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his plea in barr of the information aforesaid pleaded doth suppose that the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th was seised of the reversion of the manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. As of Fee and Right in the right of his Crown of England by colour of the Attainder of the aforesaid Edward late Earl of VVarwick and by the force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament in the yeer of the Reign of the said late King the 19th in the Barr aforesaid mentioned by which Act it was enacted that the aforesaid Edward late Earl shâ—uld forfeit to the said late King all his Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments whereas the aforesaid late King by vertue of the Attainder and Act of Parliament aforesaid as before is said made could not be seised of the Reversion aforesaid before inquisition thereof taken and of record remaining by which it should be sound that the aforesaid Earl at the time of the treason aforesaid by him committed or ever after was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and in this that the aforesaid Richard doth suppose that the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th dyed seised of that Reversion and that the said Reversion descended to the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th as Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th Whereas in fact the said Reversion did not descend to the said late King Henry the 8th nor by the Lawes of this Kingdom could descend before the Inquisition thereof for the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th thereof to be found and of Record to remain And in this that the said Richard Bushopp supposeth that by a certain Inquisition taken at the Castle of VVorcester the 5th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 23th before Roger VVinter Esquire then Escheator of the said late King in the said County by virtâ—e of his office It was found that the aforesaid Edward late Earl of VVarwick was seised of the Reversion of the Manor aforesaid as of Fee and Right and so thereof being seised the aforesaid Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th in the 19th yeer of his Reign aforesaid was made in Manner and form aforesaid and that by Colour of the said Act of Parliament aforesaid the late King Henry the 7th was seised of the Reversion aforesaid as by the Inquisition aforesaid in the Court of Chancery of the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster in due manner reserved and here of Record remaining more fully appeareth Whereas every Inquisition taken upon whatsoever Attainder of High-Treason taken before the Escheator by virtue of his Office ought to be retorned into the Court of the Kings Exchequer and there ought to be filed and not in the Court of Chancery And if in the Court of Exchequer retorned and there of Record it be not filed then the said Inquisition is void and of no force in Law And in this That whereas the aforesaid Richard Bushopp supposeth That the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 3d. day of November in the yeer of his Reign the 23th by his Letters Patents under his great Seal of England sealed bearing date the same day and yeer reciting That whereas the said late King the 12th day of October in the 12th yeer of his Reign had given and granted to the abovesaid Walter Walshe the Mannor of Grafton Fleuard with the appurtenances for the Term of the life of the said VValter and whereas the same late King the 6th day of December in the yeer of his Reign the 21th by other his Letters
Patents had given and granted to the abovesaid VValter and to one Elizabeth then his Wife The aforesaid Mannor of Charleton with the appurtenances in the said County of Somerset To have and to hold to the said VValter and Elizabeth and the longer liver of them The late King Henry the 8th for that that the said VValter the aforesaid Letters Patents to him of the aforesaid Mannor of Grafton Fleuard and the said VValter and the aforesaid Elizabeth the said Letters Patents to them of the aforesaid Mannor of Charleton in form aforesaid made to the said late King Henry the 8th in his Chancery had delivered up there to be cancelled By the said letters patents gave and granted to the abovesaid VValter and Elizabeth the aforesaid Manor of Abotesly with the appurtenances whereof c. to have and to hold to them the said VValter and Elizabeth and to the heirs males of the bodie of the said VValter begotten And the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in his plea aforesaid hath not shewed in fact that the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th by his letters patents had given and graunted to the aforesaid VValter and Elizabeth the aforesaid Mannor of Charleton with the appurtenances to have and to hold to the said VValter and Elizabeth for the Term of the longest liver of them as by the Law he ought to have shewed and because expresly it is not shewed in the said plea that the same grants were made but only by way of recital The aforesaid Consideration in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th in the yeer of his Reign the 23th aforesaid made are void and insufficient in Law And the said late King in his grant aforesaid by reason thereof was deceived And in this That the aforesaid Richard in his Plea aforesaid allegeth that the aforesaid VValter and Elizabeth the said Letters Patents to them of the aforesaid Mannor of Charleton made in the Chancery of the said late King Henry the 8th had surrendred and procured to be cancelled By which the Estate of the said VValter and Elizabeth of and in that Mannor was determined Whereas by the Law of the Land the estate of the said Elizabeth then being under Covert Baron by the surrendring and cancelling of the said Letters Patents was not determined or surrendred up And upon this That whereas the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in his pleading alleged That by the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the said late King Henry the 8th the 8th day of June in the 28th year of his Reign made it was Enacted That the said late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors should have hold and enjoy all and singular the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in Fee simple saving alwayes to all person and persons Bodies politique and Corporate their Heirs and Successors and to the Heirs and Successors of every of them other than to the aforesaid late Countess of Warwick and her Heirs and the Heirs of the said Richard late Earl of Warwick Brother of the said late Countess all such Rights Titles Uses Interests Term of years demise demises Entries Actions Grants and Conditions which he or any of their Heir or the Heirs or Successors of any of them have or had or might to have or ought to have had if the said Act of Parliament had never been made any thing in the said Act to the contrary thereof notwithstanding And the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in his Plea aforesaid doth not allege in fact That the aforesaid Ann now Countess of Warwick in whose Right and as Servant of which Countess the said Richard makes Justification of the Trespass and Intrusion aforesaid was not Heir of the said Richard late Earl of Warwick as by the Law of the Land it ought to be shewed and in this that by the said Act of the 28th abovesaid The aforesaid Mannor of Abbottesley with the appurtenances whereof c. was given by express words to the said late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors and thereof the said Saving in the same Act mentioned is repugnant and void to reserve any right in that Mannor to any other person and therefore the aforesaid Walter Walshe and Elizabeth his wife to have or claim any right or estate of or in the said Mannor by force of the said Act of Parliament are barred And in this That whereas the aforesaid Plea of the said Richard Bushopp above in Barr pleaded is insufficient in Law to discharge or excuse him the said Richard of the Trespass intrusion and ingress aforesaid upon which Plea the aforesaid Attorney of the said Lady the Queen had demurred in Law and demanded Judgement there for the said Lady the Queen yet that notwithstanding it is adjudged by the Barons That the Plea of the said Richard is sufficient in Law him the said Richard of the Entry and Intrusion into the aforesaid Wood called Alton-wood otherwise Aluingâ—on-wood the aforesaid first day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th and from the same day until the exhibiting of the Information aforesaid and of the taking of the issues and profits thereof by that time to discharge And so the same Attorney General for the said Lady the Queen saith That in the Record and process aforesaid and in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly erred And thereupon the said Attorney of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayeth That the Judgement aforesaid for those Errors and others in the Record and Process aforesaid be revoked annulled and be had for nothing And also a Writ to warn the aforesaid Richard Bushopp to be here before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer at a certain day to hear the Record and Process aforesaid as also the aforesaid Errors which he the said Attorny General of the said Lady the Queen that now is there alleged and it is granted unto him And it is commanded to the Sherif of the said County of Worcester That by good and lawful men of his Balywick he give warning to the said Richard Bushop that he before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid upon Tuesday falling the 26th day of the said Moneth of April to hear in form aforesaid if c. And further c. that to the Court c. At which day the same Sherif that is to say Edward Harwell Esquire retorned the Writ aforesaid and sent that the said Writ was so late delivered unto him that for the shortnesse of the time he could not execute it Yet the aforesaid Richard Bushop before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer at the same day comes into the Chamber aforesaid by Arthur Salway his Attorny and demands the hearing of the Record and of the Processe as also of the aforesaid Errors and they are read
unto him Which being read and heard The said Richard saith That in the Record and Processe aforesaid and in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is in nothing erred and prayeth That the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer do proceed aswell to the Examination of the Record and Processe as to the aforesaid matters for Errors alleged according to the form of the Statute aforesaid And the aforesaid Attorny of the said Lady the Queen saith as above and prayeth likewise c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurey will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given here to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the next day after Tuesday falling the 3d. day of May to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer into the Chamber aforesaid the said Richard Bushop comes by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the first Tuesday following the Term of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the second Tuesday in the Term of Michael next comming to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid did not come But John Popham Knight and Edward Anderson Knight Chief Justices of each Bench come at the same day and then are there present according to the form of the Statute in such case made And the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid comes by his Attorny aforesaid before the said Justices And the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors by the said Justices is adjorned and continued by virtue of the said Statute until Tuesday next And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop to hear their Judgement thereon c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday falling the 8th of November following to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Treasurer and the aforesaid Chief Justices present in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because for the absence for the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal in the aforesaid Businesse and Sute of Error it cannot be proceeded the same cause is continued and adjorned by them the Lord Treasurer and Chief Justices by virtue of the Act aforesaid made until Tuesday falling the 22th day of November then next following in the Chamber aforesaid And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the same Chamber to hear his Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the aforesaid Justices in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid the aforesaid Lord Treasurer there then not comming the Business and Sute of Errors aforesaid is continued and adjorned by them the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Chief Justices by virtue of the aforesaid Act thereof made until the second Tuesday in the Term of St. Hillary then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer came not in the Chamber aforesaid but the aforesaid Chief Justices of each Bench came into the same Chamber and are there present And the aforesaid Richard Bushop at the same day in the Chamber aforesaid before the said Justices likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned further by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made until the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter next following And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the aforesaid Chief Justices comes here the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid by his Attorny aforesaid and the said Lord Treasurer then and there not comming the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the last Tuesday of the aforesaid Term of Easter in the Chamber aforesaid and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesa to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer aforesaid come not But the aforesaid Chief Justices come into the same Chamber and are there present And the aforesaid Richard Bushop likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors by them is continued and adjorned further by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made until the first Tuesday in the Term of the Holy Trinity then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer then and there come not the aforesaid Business and Sute of Erors is continued and adjorned according to the form of the Statute thereof made further until Tuesday the 4th day of July in the same Term of the Holy Trinity the same day is given to the aforesaid Ric. Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear his Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Ric Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Lord Treasurer come not therfore the aforesaid Business Sute of Errors is
continued and adjorned according to the form of the Statute aforesaid further until the third Tuesday in the Term of St. Michael next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber afores to hear their Judgment therof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the 21th day of November in the same Term of St. Michael and the same day is given to th aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesa to hear their judgment thereof c. â—At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Businesse and Sute of Errors is adjorned and continued according to the form of the Statute aforesaid until the second Tuesday of the Term of St. Hillary next following And the same day is given to the afores Rich. Bushop to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Treasurer come not therefore the Business and Sute of Errors aforesaid until the first Tuesday in the Term of the Holy Trinity next following And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber afores to hear their Judgement thereof At which day before the aforesaid Thomas Egerton Knight Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Thomas Lord Buckherst now Lord Treasurer of England in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen as at first prayeth c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer will further avise of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises before c. Further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the second Tuesday in the term of St. Michael then next following to hear their Judgement therof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not avised yet of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the 23th day of October the same Term of St Michael to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorney aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the 30th day of the said Moneth of October the same Term of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer do not come in the Chamber aforesaid but the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid come and the aforesaid Richard Bushopp at the same day in the same Chamber and before the same Justices likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid business and sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further untill Tuesday the 6th day of November the same Term of Saint Michael and the same day is given unto aforesaid Richard Bushopp to hear their Judgement therof c. At which day neither the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal nor Lord Tresurer nor the aforesaid Chief Justices come unto the Chamber aforesaid Afterwards the said Lady the Queen that now is sent here another her writ close under her Great Seal out of her Court of Chancerie to the Tresurer and Barons of this Exchepuer directed the Tenor of which writ followeth in these words ss Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Tresurer and her Barons of her Exchequor Greeting Because in the Record and Process and because of giving of Judgement in the plaint which was in our Court before you the aforesaid Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid in the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of our Reign the 37th by Bill between us and Richard Bushopp of certain Trespass and Intrusion in certain Woods with the appurtenances called Alton otherwise Aluington Wood conteyning by estimation 3000 Acres of Wood in Alton otherwise Aluington and Rock in our County of Worcestor manifest Error intervened to our great damage and because in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. our Progenitor at Westminster in the 31th yeer of his Reign holden made amongst other things it is agreed unto and established that in all cases the King or other persons concerning where any one complaineth of Error done in process in the Exchequer the Chancellor and Tresurer cause to come before them in some Chamber of Councel nigh unto the Exchequer the same Record and process out of the said Exchequer and taking to them the Justices and other sages such as to them they shall seem to be taken to call before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid to hear their Informations and the causes of their Judgement and upon this business duly cause to be examined and if any Error should be found the same cause to be mended and the Rolls amended and after them into the Exchequer to do execution therof to be sent back as belongeth as in the said Statute it is conteyned We therefore willing Error if any such were according to the form of the Statute aforesaid to be corrected and full and speedy Justice to be
done in his behalf command you that if Judgement be thereof given then the Record and Process aforesaid with all things touching the same before our beloved and faitfull Councellor Thomas Egerton Knight Keeper of our Great Seal of England and you you the aforesaid Tresurer in the Chamber of Councel nigh the Exchequer aforesaid called the Councel Chamber upon Tuesday that is to say the 15th day of February next comming cause to come that the same Keeper of our Great Seal and you the aforesaid Tresurer the Record aforesaid seeing and the process aforesaid and hearing your Informations you the aforesaid Barons cause to be done what of right according to the form of the statute aforesaid was to be done Witnesse my self at Westminster the 29th day of January in the yeer of the Reign the 42th Symons And at the aforesaid 5th day of February in the aforesaid Writ mentioned The aforesaid Thomas Egerton Knight Keeper of the Great Seal of England and Thomas Lord Buckhurst Lord Tresurer of England caused to come before them the Record aforesaid in the aforesaid Chamber nigh the Exchequer aforesaid called the Council Chamber And at the same day and place come before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen and for the said Lady the Queen saith That in the Record and processe and also in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid It is diversly erred in manner and form as by the aforesaid Articles of Errors by him first alleged and assigned above it is alleged And for the said Lady the Queen prayeth another Writ of the Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid Richard Bushopp to be before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer at a certain day to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid and also the Errors aforesaid c. and it is granted unto him And it is commanded to the Sherif of the County of Worcester That by good and lawful men of his Balywick he warn the said Richard Bushopp that he be before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter next following to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid as also the Errors aforesaid above alleged and further c. What to the Court c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid the Sherif of the County of Worcester aforesaid that is to say William Childe Esquire Retorned the Writ aforesaid endorced thus ss By virtue of this Writ to me directed I gave warning to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by John Jolley John Harris Thomas Penington and John Wemb good and lawful men of my Balywick to be before the said Keeper of the Great Seal at the day and place within contained as within to me is commanded And upon this the aforesaid Richard Bushop by Arthur Salway his Attorny at the same day in the Chamber aforesaid likewise cometh and demands the hearing of the Record and Processe as also of the Errors aforesaid and they are read unto him c. Which being read and heard the said Richard saith That in the Record and processe aforesaid in nothing it is erred And prayeth That the aforesaid Lord proceed to the Examination aswel of the Record and Processe aforesaid as of the businesse aforesaid for Errors by the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen above alleged according to the form of the aforesaid Statute thereof made And the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen saith as before he had said and prayeth likewise c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday next to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the said Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday to hear their Judgment thereof c. At which day before the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at VVestminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer are not yet a vised of the giving of their Judgment of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until the first Tuesday in the Term of Holy Trinity then next comming to hear Judgement thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the third day of June the same Term of Holy Trinity to hear Judgment thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Gâ—eat Seal and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the Premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday the 10th day of June next the same Term of the Holy Trinity to hear their their Judgment thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh Rchard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid And upon this the premises being seen by the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England and the aforesaid Tresurer and mature deliberation thereof amongst them being had and taking to them the aforesaid John Popham Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen for Pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned and Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench as also of Francis Gawdy one of the Justices to Pleas before the aforesaid Lady the Queen to be
for the payment of his Debts or Legacies or for any other necessary purpose or intent It shall and may be lawful to and for the said Christopher Digges together with Sr. Henry Cripps Knight John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood or three of them the said Henry Cripps John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood at any time hereafter during the life of the said Christopher Digges together with and by the joynt Consent and Agreement of the said Henry Cripps John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood or three of them the said Henry John Francis Richard Thomas and Richard by their Joynt Deed or Writing Indented of them the said Christopher Digges Henry Cripps John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood or of the said Christopher Digges or of three of them the said Henry John Francis Richard Thomas and Richard and being sealed with the seals of the said Christopher Digges Henry Cripps John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood or of the said Christoper Digges or three of them the said Henry John Francis Richard Thomas and Richard and to be inrolled in any Court of Record of our sovereign Lady the Queen or of her Heirs and Successors to make void and frustrate any of the use or uses estate or estates in these presents above mentioned expressed or declared onely for of or in any such part or parcel of the premises as by the said Christopher Digges Henry Cripps John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood or by the said Christopher Digges or three of them the said Henry Iohn Francis Richard Thomas and Richard shall be thought meet and convenient and by the said Writing Indented and Inrolled shall be expresly limited and appointed and no otherwise And thereof by the said Writing Indented so to be inâ—olled of new to declare limit or appoint any such new or any other such use or uses estate or estates as to the said Christopher Digges Henry Cripps Iohn Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood or any three of the said Henry John Francis Richard Thomas and Richard shall be thought meet and convenient as by the said Writing Indented shall be expressed and declared and not otherwise any thing in this present Indenture contained to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding And that immediatly from and after such new Declaration Limitation and Appointing of any new or other use or uses of or in any part or parcel of the premises by writing Intended sealed and inrolled as aforesaid than the use and uses estate or estates of such and so much onely of the premises whereof any such new Declaration Limitation or Appointment shall be so had and made shall be And the said Christopher Digges his Heirs and Assignes and all other person or persons their Heirs and Assignes which at any time hereafter shall stand and be seized of or in so much of the premses whereof any such new Declaration limiting and appointing shall be so had and made shall stand and be seized thereof to the use of such person and persons and to such use intents and conditions as shall be mentioned and expressed in the said Writing Indented and Inrolled and to none other use intent or purpose any thing above mentioned to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding In witnesse whereof the parties to these presents inter changeably to this present Writing Indented have put their Seals the day and yeer above written By virtue of which Indenture and by force of a Statute transferring of uses into possession in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex holden made The aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father was seized of the Manors and Tenements with the appurtenances within monstraâ—s de droit above specified in his Demesn as of Freehold for the term of his life the remainâ—er thereof to the aforesaid Thomas the Heirs Males of his Body issuing and for default of such issue The Remainder thereof to the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Christopher the Father of the aforesaid Martha lawfully begotten And the said Christopher Digges the Father so of the Manors and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances being seized the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid Thomas in form aforesaid expecting The said Christopher Digges the Father and the aforesaid Ioh. Brook Ric. Brook Tho. Leweson afterwards and before the day c. that is to say the 6th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 12th By a certain Indenture between them the said Christopher Digges the Father and the aforesaid Iohn Brook Richard and Thomas Leweson of the one part Thomas Ovington and Thomas Digges of Chertham in the County of Kent Gent. of the other paâ—t made and in the Court of Chancery of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster then being the 4th day of Iunc in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 12th aforesaid in due manner of Record inrolled one part of which with the Seals of the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father Iohn Richard and Thomas Leweson sealed To the Jurors aforesaid in evidence was shewed whose Date is the same day and yeer abovesaid In which Indenture reciting the first Indenture bearing Date the 6th of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 10th abovesaid made between him the said Christopher Digges the Father of the one part and the aforesaid Henry Cripps Knight Iohn Brook Francis Gaâ—acre Richard Brook Thomas Ltweson and Richard Horewood of the other part Covenanted Granted and Agreed to and with the aforesaid Thomas Ovington and Thomas Digges their Heirs Executors and Assigns in manner and form as followeth in these words And also whereas The said Christopher Digges at the time of the making of the said Indenture in these presents above recited was seized of an Estate of Inheritance amongst other the Manâ—rs Lands Tenements and Hereditaments abovesaid of and in one Close in the abovesaid Parish of Barham in the occupying of Bartholmew Baker containing by estimation 3. Acres and 2. Acres of Land in Stony Rock and 3. Acres and 2. yards in Parsonage-field in the occupation of the said Bartholmew Baker in Barham aforesaid and 2. half Acres of Land in the occupying of Henry Crowd and one half Acre late in the occupation of Iohn Barham Gent. in the Parish of Barham aforesaid And also 3. Acres called Green Hill and one Acre lying in Brome lease joyning to Thomas Laddes Ground and one yard in Iohn Nashes Land lying in Barham aforesaid and Kingston next Barham in the County aforesaid
use thereof in the abovesaid Fine in form abovesaid to be levyed and acknowleged before by this Indenture not limited or appointed the Rent of 10 quarters of Barley only except to be to the only use and behoof of the said Christopher Digges his Heirs and Assignes for ever and to no other use or uses purpose or intent and that the said Fine or use and execution thereof as to the abovesaid 10 Quarters of Bâ—rley to be to the only use and behoof of the abovesaid Richard Gaunt and his Heirs for ever In witness whereof the parties abovesaid to these present Indentures their Seals enterchangeably have set dated the day and yeer first above wriâ—ten And the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as afore is said of the Manors Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Monstrans de droiâ— within written specified as the Law requireth being seised Afterwards and before the bringing of the Monstrans de droit within written that is to say from the day of Saint Martin within writen in 15 dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid A Fine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middleâ—ex before James Dyer Richard Weston John Welsh and Richard Harper then Justices and afterwards in 8 dayes of Saint Hillary in the yeer of the same Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid there then granted and recorded before the said Justices and oâ—hers of the Queens faithfull people then and there present between the aforesaid Richard Gaunt Gentleman and Lawrence Applegate plaintiâ—s and the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha his Wife deforceants of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the Monstrans de droit within written with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Manors of Owtelmestone Mayton Nackington and Yokes Court with the appurtenances and 40 Messuages 20 Tofts one Mil 3 Dovehouses 20 Gardens 12 Orchards 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 700 Acres of Pasture 600 Acres of Wood 100 Acres of Furze and Heath and 100 shillings of Rent and the Rent of 10 Quarters of Barley with the appurtenances in Barham Kingstone Bishopsborn Bridge Patricksborne Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey Saint Stephens Nackington Netherherds Lenham Harisham Frinsted Sutton Ripple and Shalden whereupon a plea of Covenant then was summoned between them in the said Court That the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha do acknowlege the aforesaid Manors and Rents with the appurtenances to be the Right of the said Richard and those which the said Richard and Lawrence then had of the gift of the aforesaid Christopher and Martha and these then remised and quit claimed from them the said Christopher and Martha their Heirs to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the the said Richard for ever and moreover the said Christopher and Martha then had granted for them Heirs the of the said Christopher that they warrant to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Manors Tenements and Rents with the appurtenances against all men for ever and for this Recognition Release Quit claim warranty Fine and Concord the said Richard and Lawrence gave to the aforesaid Christopher and Martha 8 pound Sterling which Fine was levied with proclamations according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And further the Jurors say upon their oath aforesaid that the aforesaid Fine in form aforesaid levyed was had and levyed to the uses and intents in the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 26th day of October in yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th as abovesaid above specified By colour of which Fine Indenture and Statute aforesaid the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father was seised of the Manors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances as the Law requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as before is said of the Manors and Tenements above written as the Law requireth being seised the said Christopher Digges the Father and the aforesaid John Brook Richard Brook and Richard Horewood afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th came into the Court of the said Lady the Queen of her Chancery and then and there acknowleged the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 20th day of September in the 13th yeer aforesaid to be their deed and upon that the said Indenture afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the 14 yeer aforesaid in the said Court of Chancery in due Maner of Record was Inrolled By virtue of which and force of the Statute aforesaid the said Christopher Digges the Father was of the Manors Lands and Tenements within written seised as the same Law requireth and so thereof being seised the said Christo Digges the Father afterwards and before the day of the bringing of the shewing of right within written that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of our Lord 1576 and in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th made his Testament and last Will in writing of which said Testament and last Will the Tenor amongst other followeth in these Words In the Name of God Amen The first day of February in the yeer of our Lord God 1576 and in the 19th yeer of the Reign of our Sovereign Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. I Christopher Digges of Saint Gregories without the Walls of the City of Canterbury Esquire Son and Heir of William Digges late of Barham in the County of Kent deceased being sick in body but of good and perfect remembrance thanked be the Almighty God Revoking and making void all other my former wills ordayn and make this my present Testament and last Will in manner and form following That is to say this is the last Will of me the abovesaid Christopher Digges made the day and yeer abovesaid touching the disposition of all my Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the County of Kent and Canterbury or elsewhere in the Realm of England First touching the thirds and third part of my Land to be due unto the Queens Majesty or any other for Wardship Primer seisin Livery or otherwise my Will and meaning is to leave to descend to Thomas Digges my Son to have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever All these my Lands and Tenements called or known by the name of Eastendown containing by estimation 10 Acres of Land and all these Lands Tenements Hereditaments which I had by descent after the death of Thomas Digges of Newington next Sittingborn Esquire deceased and if the
Assignes the interest aforesaid of the aforesaid Term of years of and in the Moyety of the demesn Lends aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said Robert Wright the Grandfathe in form aforesaid demised By virtue whereof the said Edward was of the interest of the Term aforesaid possessed and being so thereof possessed The said Edward the 11th day of July in the yeer of our Lord 1563. at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing and by his said Testament constituted and appointed Agnes then his Wife to be sole Executrix of his said last Will And by the said his last Will gave and bequeathed all his interest aforesaid in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid so as before is said with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright now the plantiâ— one of the Sons of the said Edward And afterwards the said Edward Wright at Eastmeon aforesaid dyed of his Interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised possessed After whose death the aforesaid Agnes took upon her the burden of Execution of the last Will of the said Edward aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid and the said Executrix at Eastmeon aforesaid gave her consent that he the said Robert Wright should have and injoy to him and his Assignes the interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised By virtue of which the said Robert Wright now plantif was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed until the morrow of the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of our Lord 1575. in which morrow of the aforesaid Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer 1575. aforesaid The said Robert Wright now plantif into the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed And so thereof being possessed the said Moyety with the Appurtenances had held and injoyed and now hath and occupieth and ought to have and occupy of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever of in or upon the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any parcel thereof yeerly any manner of wayes growing and appertaining renewing or arising for the occasion aforesaid in this behalf alleged utterly exonerated acquitted freed and privileged by reason of the Prescription and Privilege aforesaid And whereas by the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th holden at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of November in the second yeer of his Reign amongst other things It is enacted by authority of that Parliament That no person be sued or otherwise compelled to yeeld giue or pay any manner of Tithes for any Manors Tenements or Hereditaments which by the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom of England or by any Privilege or Prescription were not chargeable with the payment of any such Tithes by any Composition reall as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appeareth Yet the aforesaid Nicholas Wright in his life time pretending himself to be Farmer of the Rectory of the Parish Church aforesaid and by colour of a demise to him thereof made by Thomas by Divine Providence then Bishop of Winchester for the Term of 21. yeers supposed to be made upon that occasion falsely supposing Tithes whatsoever in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid demised arising and happening to the said Nicholas Wright by virtue of the demise aforesaid to him in form â—foresaid supposed to be made to belong and appertain whereas in truth The said Robert now plantif the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid by virtue of the Demise aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid made and by reason of the immunity of the Privilege and Act aforesaid above specified was exonerated acquitted freed and privileged of and from payment of Tithes whatsoever thereupon growing to have and injoy ought during the Term aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid granted of the premises not ignorant endeavouring the Queens Majesty that now is and her Regal Crown to desinherit and to draw the conusance of her Pleas which do belong to her Royal Crown and not to the spiritual Court to another Jurisdiction and Examination in the spiritual Court supposing the Indenture of demise aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Granfather made and the Writing of Confirmation aforesaid as also the Estate of him the said Robert now plantif of and in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert the Grandfather from the Tithes aforesaid in form aforesaid discharged had and made to be void and of no validity in Law whereas in truth The Indenture of demise aforesaid and the Writing of Confirmation theâ—eof and also the Estate of the said Robert aforesaid the now plantif of and in the Moyety of the aforesaid demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert the Grandfather in manner aforesaid demised so as before is said discharged of Tithes is good and effectual in the Law And whereas in truth the same demise to the aforesaid Nicholas in form aforesaid alleged to be made if any such waâ— was utterly void and insufficient in Law as to any Tithes of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid growing is The said Robert Wright now the plantif in the spiritual Court before the Reverend and worthy Man Mr. William Awbray Doctor of Law in the Court of Audience of causes and businesse in the Court of Canterbury lawfully deputed to hear of and for the withdrawing and not payment of Tithes of Wheat Barly Pease and Beans of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer of our Lord 1590. growing renewing arising and happening as also of and for the withdrawing and non payment of the Tithes of the Wool of Lambs and Sheep of the said Robert now plantif of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer of our Lord aforesaid kept shorn and arising as also of the Tithes of the Aples of the said Robert Wright the plantif of in and upon the said aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer aforesaid growing gotten and arising the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Eastmeon aforesaid in the County aforesaid drew into sute And the aforesaid Nicholas the same Robert now plantif before the aforesaid spiritual Judge for that occasion aforesaid to appear and to the said Nicholas of and upon the premises to
answer in that manner the validity in Law of the Indenture of the demise aforesaid by the said Stephen late Bishop aforesaid in form aforesaid made and the Confirmation aforesaid as also the Estate of the said Robert the now plantif aforesaid of and in the aforesaid Moyety of the aforesaid demesn Lands with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid made and the Tithes thereof arising to the spiritual Court aforesaid to draw and determine caused most unjustly bound Which Plea by Appeal in that behalf had and made from the aforesaid Court of Audience before the worshipful and worthy men Robert Forth Thomas Binge John Lloyd Thomas Legg and Richard Swale Doctors of Law Judges Delegates in that behalf was duly removed and in the spiritual Court before the same Judges Delegates or some of them at Eastmeon aforesaid as yet dependeth undecided and although the said Robert the now Plaintiff The Indenture of demyse aforesaid and the Writing of Confirmation aforesaid and the Estate of the said Robert now Plaintiff aforesaid of and in the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid of the Tythes aforesaid discharged with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert VVright the Grand Father in form aforesaid demysed and the other matter aforesaid in this part conteined as well to the aforesaid spiritual Court before the aforesaid VVilliam Ambrey spiritual Judge aforesaid as in the aforesaid spiritual Court before the Judges Delegates aforesaid in discharge of the premises is shewed pleaded and alleged and the Sealing and delivery of the Indenture aforesaid and of the Writing of Confirmation aforesaid and the residue of the matter in that behalf conteined on the part of him the said Robert VVright the now Plaintiff in the premises in that behalf alleged according to the Law of this Kingdom of England with unavoidable truth and witness he offered to prove yet the said Judge of the Court of Audience aforesaid and the aforesaid Judges Delegates in the aforesaid spiritual Court aforesaid The Plea Allegation and that proof utterly refused and every of them refused to admit And afterwards the Appeal aforesaid so depending in the aforesaid spiritual Court before the Judges aforesaid The said Nicholas VVright at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in writing and thereof constituted and ordained Iohn Wright his Executor of his said Testament and afterwards there dyed after whose death the aforesaid Iohn Wright took upon him the charge of the Execution of the Testament aforesaid and the Prosecution of the Appeal aforesaid in the cause aforesaid and afterwards the aforesaid John Wright the Executor aforesaid the aforesaid Robert Wright now Plaintiff in the aforesaid spiritual Court before the aforesaid Judges Delegates at Eastmeon aforesaid for the occasion aforesaid unjustly bound to appear and the said Robert now Plaintiff of and in the premises to condemn and to the Tythes aforesaid in the aforesaid several spiritual Courts in form aforesaid demanded to him to be paid to compel by the Definitive sentence of the said Court of Delegates with all his power yet endeavoureth and daily threatneth And although the Writ of the aforesaid Lady the Queen of Prohibition to the aforesaid Judges Delegates and other Judges in that behalf the 12th day of July in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 37th at Eastmeon aforesaid to the contrary thereof was directed and delivered The said Iohn VVright the Plea aforesaid after the Queens Majesties Prohibition first to the contrary thereof in form aforesaid directed and delivered that is to say the first day of October in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37th at Eastmeon aforesaid in the County aforesaid prosecuted and in the Plea aforesaid proceeded the said Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Prohibition to the aforesaid spiritval Judges first to the contrary thereof in form aforesaid directed and delivered in any thing notwithstanding in contempt of the said Lady the Queen that now is and to the damage prejudice impoverishing and grievous molesting of him the said Robert now Plaintff and contrary to the form and effect of the Prescription Privilege and Act of Parliament aforesaid whereupon the same Robert now Plaintiff saith That he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 40. Marks and thereof as well for the said Lady the Queen as for himself he bringeth sute c. And now at this day that is to say VVednesday after 10. of â—aster this Term untill which day the said Iohn VVright had license to the Bill aforesaid to imparl cometh as well the said Robert VVright by his Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid â—ohn VVright by Stephen VVorley his Attorney and the said Iohn defendeth the force and injury when c. and all the contempt and whatsoever c. and saith he did not prosecute the Plea aforesaid in the spiritual Court aforesaid after the Queens Prohibition to him first to the contrary directed and delivered in manner and form as the aforesaid Robert Wright who aswel c. above against him complaineth And of this puts himself upon the Country and the aforesaid Robert who aswel for c. likewise c. But to have a consultation in this behalf The said John by Protestation not acknowleging any thing by the aforesaid Robert above alleged to be true For Plea the said John saith That well and true it is That the aforesaid Robert in the aforesaid spiritual Court before the aforesaid Judges Delegates shewed pleaded and alleged That the aforesaid Stephen late bishop of Winchâ—ster â—foresaid the aforesaid 4th day of July in the 38th yeer aforesaid was seized of the aforesaid Manor of Eastmeon with the Appurtenances in the County of Southampton aforesaid whereof the aforesaid capital Messuage with the Appurtenances called the Scite of the Manor of Eastmeon 800. Acres of Land 500. Acres of Meadow 400. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Eastmeon aforesaid being demesn Lands of the Manor aforesaid then and from the time aforesaid were parcel And of and in the aforesaid Messuage with the Appurtenances being the Mansion house of the Manor aforesaid in his demesn as of Fee in the right of his Bishoprick aforesaid And that the said Stephen and all his Predecessors Bishops of the Bishoprick aforesaid being seized of the Manor aforesaid and other the premises with their Appurtenances from the whole time aforesaid for him and his Farmers his Tenants thereof and of every parcel thereof for the term of yeers or at will had holden and enjoyed to them discharged acquitted freed and privileged of and from the payment of any Tithes of in or upon the aforesaid capital Messuage and demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof yeerly any manner of ways by the whole time aforesaid growing happening and renewing or arising And that the aforesaid late Bishop of the capital Messuage aforesaid and of the
demesn â—ands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized and the same having and holding exonerated acquitted freed and privileged of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever in and upon the capital Messuage aforesaid and other the premises with their Appurtenances or any part thereof growing renewing or in any wise happening the aforesaid 4th day of July in the yeer of the reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 38th aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid by his aforesaid Indenture with the Seal of his Bishoprick sealed bearing date the said day and yeer demised to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather of the aforesaid Robert The Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances by the name of all the demesn Lands of the Manor of Eastmeon aforesaid of old appertaining with all Houses Stables Barns and Buildings upon the Moyety aforesaid then and of old situate lying and being with the Appurtenances which Moyety then lay in the Fields on the South part of the Town of Eastmeane aforesaid To have and to hold the said Moyety with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather and to his Assignes from the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel which then should be in the yeer of our Lord God 1575. until the end and Term of 40. yeers from thence next following and fully to be ended And that afterwards that is to say The aforesaid 20th day of July in the 38th yeer aforesaid the aforesaid William Kingsmill then Dean of the aforesaid Cathedral Church of the Holy Trinity of Winchester and the Chapter of the same place at Winchester aforesaid in their Chapter-house aforesaid by their Writing aforesaid sealed with the Chapter-Seal aforesaid in the life of the aforesaid late Bishop and in the life time of the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather confirmed and ratified And that the said Robert Wright by virtue of the demise and confirmation aforesaid was of the interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid 14th day of August in the yeer of our Lord 1658. aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Will in Writing and by his said Will constituted the aforesaid Margaret and Nicholas Wright his Executors and by the said his Will gave and bequeathed all his interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Edward Wright Son of the said Robert the Grandfather And afterwards at Eastmeon aforesaid dyed of his Interest aforesaid in form aforesaid possessed After whose death the aforesaid Edward by the assent of the Executors aforesaid was of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of yeers of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed And that the said Edward so being thereof possessed the aforesaid 11th day of July in the yeer of our Lord 1563. abovesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Will in Writing and by his said Will constituted one Agnes then his Wife his Executrix of his Will aforesaid And by the said his Will gave and bequeathed all his Interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the now plantif and afterwards there dyed of such his interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid possessed And that the said Robert now plantif by the consent of the said Agnes the burden of the Execution of the Will aforesaid upon her taking was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of our Lord 1575. immediately after which Feast the said Robert into the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and that the aforesaid Robert thereof so possessed the said Tenements with the Appurtenances likewise had and occupyed and ought to have and occupy of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever of in and upon the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any part thereof yeerly any wayes growing happening renewing or arising by the occasion aforesaid alleged utterly discharged acquitted freed and privileged by reason of the Prescription and Privilege aforesaid and by force of the said Statute aforesaid in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 6th at Westminster aforesaid the aforesaid 4th day of November in the second yeer of his Reign of the payment of Tithes then made as the aforesaid Robert VVright now plantif above alleged But the said John VVright further saith That the aforesaid Judges Delegates in the aforesaid Court before them the Plea and Allegations of the aforesaid Robert Wright now plaintif allowed and the Proofs thereof by him the said Robert brought accepted and admitted Without that that the aforesaid Judge Delegates in the aforesaid spirituâ—l Court before them the Plea Allegations and Proofs of the aforesaid Robert VVright now plan if â—foresaid refused to admit in manner and form as the aforesaid Robert now plantif above hath alleged And this he is ready to aver whereupon he demands Judgement and the Writ of the Lady the Queen of consultation to him in this behalf to be granted And the aforesaid Robert VVright now Plantif saith That he for any thing by the aforesaid John VVright above in pleading alleged The said Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Consultation ought not to have because he saith That the Plea aforesaid by him the said John VVright in form aforesaid above pleaded the matter therein contained is insufficient in Law to the aforesaid Writ of the Lady the Queen of Consultation to be brought to which the said Robert needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound in any wise to answer wherefore for default of sufficient answer in this behalf The said Robert demandeth Judgement and his damages aforesaid for the occasion aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid John VVright saith That the Plea aforesaid by him the said John in manner and form aforesaid above pleaded and the matter in the same contained is good and sufficient in Law to the aforesaid Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Consultation to have and demand which Plea and the matter in the same contained the said Iohn is ready to aver and prove as to the Court c. And because the said Robert to that Plea doth not Answer nor the same hitherto any wise denyeth the said Iohn as at first demandeth Judgement the Writ of the said Queen of Consultation in this behalf to be granted unto him c. And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgemen of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until the same next after to hear their Judgment oâ— and upon the premises c. Because the Court of the Lady the
Rent of 1. pound of Wax and 4. Capons with the appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House as also of the view of Frank Pledge and whatsoever to view of Frank Pledge doth appertain in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House whereof a Plea of Covenant was summoned between them in the said Court that is to say That the aforesaid William John Agnes George and Elizabeth acknowledge the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge with their appurtenances to be the right of him said Edmond as those which the said Edmond and Robert had of the gift of the aforesaid William John Agnes George and Elizabeth and them released and quit claim from them the said William Iohn Agnes George and Elizabeth and their Heirs to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Robert for ever And besides the said William granted for him and his Heirs That they would warrant to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Edmond the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge against him the said William and his Heirs forever And further the said John and Agnes granted for them and the Heirs of him the said Iohn that they would warrant to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Edmond the Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge with the appurtenances against him the said John Agnes and the Heirs of the said John for ever And moreover the said George and Elizabeth granted for them and the Heirs of him the said George that they would warrant to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Edmond The Mannor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge with the appurtenances against them the same George and Elizabeth and the Heirs of the said George forever Which Fine of the Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid levied was had and levied To the use of them the said John Gardiner and Agnes then his Wiâ—e for the Term of their lives and of the longest liver of them without impeachment of waste in any the Woods and Underwoods And aâ—ter the decease of the same John Gardiner and Agnes To the use of the aforesaid William Cary the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the aforesaid â—ob Cary then Esq and now Knight and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fine And by â—orce of a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th At Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th of transâ—erring of uses into possession The said John Gardiner and Agnes were seized of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in their demesn as of Freehold for the Term of the lives of them the said John and Agnes and the longer liver of them without impeachment of waste the aforesaid remainder thereof after the death of them the said John and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawâ—ully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue To the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever And the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes his Wife so thereof being seized Another Fine was levied in the said Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench here At Westminster aforesaid from the day of Easter 15. dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th before Edmond Anderson Francis Windham William Periam and Thom. Walmâ—sley then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here and other the said Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between John Higham Knight and Thomas Turner Esquire By the names of John Higham Knight and Thomas Turner Esquire Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Cary and the aforesaid Martha then his Wife and the aforesaid John Gardiner and the aforesaid Agnes then his Wife Deforceants of the aforesaid Manor of Collumbine-hall otherwise Thorney Collumbers with the appurtenances whereof c. By the name of the Manor of Collumbine-hall otherwise Thorney Collumbers with the appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the said Court that is to say That the aforesaid William Cary and Martha John Gardiner and Agnes acknowledged the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances whereof c. To be the Right of the said John Higham as that which the said John Higham and Thomas and of the gift of the aforesaid William Cary and Martha Iohn Gardiner and Agnes and the same released and quit claimed for them the said William Cary and Martha Iohn Gardner and Agnes and their Heirs to the aforesaid John Higham and Thomas and the Heirs of the said John Higham for ever And further the said William Cary and Martha and Iohn Gardner and Agnes granted for them and the Heirs of the said William Cary that they would warrant to the aforesaid John Higham and Thomas and to the Heirs of the said Iohn Higham the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances against all Men for ever And for the same Acknowledgement Release Quit claim Fine and Concord The said Iohn Higham and Thomas granted to the aforesaid Martha a certain Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound of lawful Mony of England to be issuing out of the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances and that to her rendred in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen To have and perceive the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to the said Martha at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions yeerly to be paid all the life time of the said Martha if the aforesaid Iohn Gardner and Agnes or any of them so long should live the first payment thereof to begin at that Feast of the Feasts aforesaid which next after the decease of the aforesaid William Cary should happen And if it should happen the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to be behind in part or in all after any of the Feasts of the Feasts aforesaid in which as before it ought to be paid and not paid That then it should be lawful to the said Martha all her life if the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes or either of them should so long live into the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances to enter and distrein and the distresses so there taken and had lawfully to lead away carry and drive and with them to
should be fully satisfied and paid as by the said Writing amongst other things more fully appeareth By virtue of which Gift and Grant the said Ann was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And so thereof being seized The said Ann afterwards and before the time in which c. at Suâ—ton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid Dionisius And afterwards and before the time in which it is supposed the taking aforesaid of the Cattel aforesaid to be done that is to say the 20th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th the aforesaid Dionisius at Sutton Atthone aforesaid dyed and the aforesaid Ann him over lived and was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And because 20. pound of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid by one whole yeer ended at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th and within the space of 40. dayes then next following were not paid to the said Ann but were behind The said George Mason and Francis as Bayliffs of the said Ann do well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. as in parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the distresse of the said Ann in form aforesaid charged and bound And this they are ready to aver Whereupon They demand Judgement and Retorn of the Cattel aforesaid together with their damages costs and charges by them about their Sute in this behalf put unto to be adjudged unto them c. And the aforesaid John Kettel saith That the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterly by any thing before alleged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which to be just ought not to acknowledge For he saith that long before the aforesaid time of taking of the aforesaid Cattel done and long before the grant of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 40 pound And long before the said Dionisius Mayow had any thing of and in the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenanes One Thomas Mayow was thereof seized in his demesn as of Fee And so being thereof seized The said Tho-Mayow before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid long before the Grant of the aforesaid Annuity that is to say the 15. day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen the 19th at Sutton Atthone aforesaid of the said 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. Enfeossed one Thomas Scot of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Gentleman and John Fremling of Dartford in the said County Baker amongst other things By the name of all those his Two Manors of Sawters and Sawley with the Barns Stables Dove-houses and all other the Houses and Buildings to the said Manors belonging Orchards Gardens with the Appurtenances situate lying and being in Sutton Atthone aforesaid then in the Tenure or Occupation of the said Thomas Mayow and also by the name of all other his Houses and Buildings Lands and Tenements Meadow Pasture Woods and Underwoods Rents and Reversions situate lying and being within the Towns Parishes and Fields of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Wilmington and Dartford or elsewhere in the aforesaid County of Kent as also the Reversion and Remainder of all and singular the premises Rents and yeerly profits reserved upon whatsoever Demises or Grants of the premises or any parcel thereof before then made To have and to hold the aforesaid Manors and other the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. To the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling their Heirs and Assignes for ever to the only use and behoof of the aforesaid Dionise Mayow Son and Heir Apparent of the said Thomas Mayow his Heirs and Assignes for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services thereof first due and of right accustomed upon the Conditions following That is to say That the aforesaid Dionise Mayow or his Heirs should pay or cause to paid to Petronill Martin of Mylton in the aforesaid County of Kent Widow the yeerly Rent of 10. pound for the Term of the life of her the said Petronill Which yeerly Rent of 10. pound the aforesaid Thomas Mayow to the aforesaid Petronill before had granted for and in consideration of a Mariage to be had and solemnized between the aforesaid Thomas Mayow and the aforesaid Petronill after the death of the aforesaid Thomas Mayow And upon Condition That if the aforesaid Thomas Mayow at any time during the natural life of the said Thomas should pay or cause to be paid to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling or to either of them or to the Heirs of the longer liver of them 10. shillings of good and lawful Mony of England that then the Feoffment aforesaid should be void and of no force in Law And that then it should be lawful to the aforesaid Tho. Mayow into the aforesaid Two Manors and all the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. to re-enter and the same to have again in his former Estate and Condition any Act Thing Cause or Matter whatsoever to the contrary thereof notwithstanding By virtue of which Feoâ—fment and by force of a certain Act in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th of transferring uses into possession The said Dionise Mayow was seized of the aforesad 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which in his demesn as of Fee upon the Conditions aforesaid And so thereof being seized The said Dionise before the aforesaid time of taking the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th abovesaid at Sutton Atthone aforesaid by his Writing â—ealâ—d with his Seal bearing date the same day and yeer Gave and Granted to the aforesaid Ann by the name of Ann Maxey of Chigwel in the County of Essex the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 20. pound to be issuing out of the aforesaid place in which c. amongst other in manner and form as the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterley above in their Conusance abovesaid have allâ—ged And the said Ann afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. At Sutton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the said Dionise and afterwards and before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th The aforesaid Thomas Mayow at Sutton Atthone aforesaid payed to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John
the Country and the said Iohn Hayward likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Easter in 5. weeks 12. c. by whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as wel c. At which day here came the Parties c. And the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore as before It is cmmanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here 12. c. in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity To recognize c. At which day here cometh the parties And the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff as at first That he cause to be here the morrow of Saint Martin 12. c. to Recognize in the form aforesaid At which dayes come the Parties and the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore as at first it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come here 12. c. 8. dayes of St. Hillary c. To Recognise c. in the form aforesaid c. At which day the Parties come c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanâ—ed to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from Faster day 15. dayes 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. at which day here come the Parties c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come here in the morrow of the holy Trinity 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. At wch day the parties come here c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here in the morrow of Saint Martin 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. At which day the Parties come here c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come in 8. days of Saint Hillary 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid At which day the Parties come and the Sheriff sent not the Writ And so several Venire Facias were award to the Sheriff from Term to Term to return Jurors at a day every of the said Term as at first and the parties come at the said dayes and the Sheriff sent not the Writ as in the Rolls upon Record appeareth And Process was continued between the Parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put in respite untill this day that is to say in days of St. Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 31. Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. upon Wednesday the 27th of Iune at East Greinstead in the County aforesaid first should come And now at this day as wel the aforesaid John Heyward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth come by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Robert Clarke one of the Barons of the Lady the Queen of her Exchequer and Iohn Puckering one of the Serjeants at Law of the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County of Sussex Assigned by the form of the Statute c. come as well the within named Iohn Hayward by William Siday his Attorney as the within written Thomas Bettisworth by John Lyons his Attorney And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say Edward Pickham William Ayles Thomas â—etley William â—revet Edmond Gray Iohn Lock Iohn Capron and John Andrew appeared and was sworn Jurors in the said Jury And because the rest of that Jury did not appear others of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff at the request of the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth And by the command of the Justices aforesaid were new put to them whose nâ—mes to the Pannel within written are filled according to the form of the Statute in such case of late made and provided The names of which Jurors so put to that is to say John Pitte Thomas Bayley William Leefe and Thomas Aglewyn come and to say the truth of the matter within contained together with the Juros first impannelled and sworn chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one John Bettisworth was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the within written Messuage and Garden witht the Appurtenances in Iping within written whereof the within written place in which c. and at the within written time in which as also time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was parcel And further the Jurors say upon their Oaths aforesaid that the aforesaid place in which c. doth contain and the aforesaid time in which c. did contain in it â—elf one Acre and half an Acre of Land and called by the name of Rainolds and is and the aforesaid time in which c. as also time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary was a several Close by it self separately inclosed and further the Iurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid John Bettisworth so thereof as before is said being seized Afterwards that is to say the 20th day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 11th at Iping afoâ—esaid By his Indenture within written made between the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the one part and the aforesaid John Hayward of the other part demised granted and to farm let to the aforesaid John Hayward the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have and to hold the said Tenements with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesaid John Hayward and his Assigns from the Feast of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following unto the end and term of 21. years then next following fully to be compleat and ended Yielding and paying therefore yearly to the aforesaid John Bettisworth and his Assigns 12. d. At the Feast of St. Michâ—el the Archangel or within 10. days next after the said Feast By vertue of which Demise the said John Hayward into the Tenents aforesaid with the Apurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof possessed the reversiâ—n thereof to the aforesaid John Bittesworth and his Heirs expectant And he the said John Heyward of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. being possessed and the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the Reversion thereof and of the Rent aforesaid being seisâ—d in Demesn as of Fee The said Iohn Bettisworth into the aforesaid Close in which c. called Rainolds in the possâ—ssion of the said Iohn Heyward entred and there immediatly after sealed and delivered as his Deed a certain Deed containing a Feoffment
King of 〈◊〉 c. came as well the within named John Crane as the within written Bartholmew Colpit by their Attornies within conteined And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called come who to say the truth of the within conteined chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the within named Henry Conny before the time within written in which c. was seized oâ— the within written 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee by discent from his Father And that the said Henry the said 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances held of the within named VVilliam Stermin â—s of his Manor of Richards with the Appurtenances in Fidde St. Giles within written by Fealty and the Rent of 13. pence at the Feast of Saint Miâ—hael the Archangel to be paid as also by the service of doing Sute at the Court of him the said VVilliam Stermin of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks upon reasonable warning at the Manor aforesaid yeerly to be holden and that of the services aforesaid the said VVilliam Stermin was seised by the hands of the aforesaid Henry Conny as by the hands of his very Tenant that is to say of the Fealty and Sute of the Court aforesaid as of Fee and Right and of the Rent aforesaid in his demesn as of Fee as the aforesaid Bartholmew within hath alleged And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid William Stermin of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances was seized in his demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said William Stermin before the within written time in which c. of the said Manor with the Appurtenances enfeoffed the within named John Welby To have and to hold to the said John Welby his Heis and Assigns forever And that the aforesaid Henry Conny being of the Age of 20. and within the Age of 21. yeers at the aforesaid Feoffment by the said William Stermin to the aforesaid John Welby in form aforesaid made of the aforesaid 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized at Fidde Saint Giles aforesaid agreed and the payment of the Rent aforesaid to the aforesaid John Welby promised And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the agreement of the aforesaid Henry Conny to the Feoffment aforesaid and his promise of the payment of the Rent aforesaid so as before is said by him the said Henry Conny he being within the Age of 21. yeers are an Attornment Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Henry did Attorn Tenant to the aforesaid John Welby in manner and form as the aforesaid Bartholmew Colpit within hath alleged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors in form aforesaid found it shall seem to the Court That the Agreement of the said Henry Conny to the Feoffment aforesaid and his promise aforesaid of payment of the Rent aforesaid so as before is said by him the said Henry being within the age of 21. yeers be not an Attornment Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Henry Conny did not Attorn Tenant to the aforesaid John Welby as the aforesaid John Crane in pleading hath alleged and then they assesse the damages of the said John by occasion within written besides his costs and charges by him about his Sute expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 5. shillings Therefore c. RESTITUTION Trinity Term Anno 13. JACOBI Rot. 23. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 11. part James Bagges Case fol. 93. a. JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. To the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough of Plymouth in the County of Devon greeting c. Whereas James Bagg one of the 12. Chief Burgesses or Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid according to the custom of the Borough aforesaid hithereto used was duly chosen and made And whereas the same James in the Office in of the 12. Chief Burgesses or Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid a long time carried and well governed himself Yet you the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough aforesaid little regarding the aforesaid Iames unduly and without reasonable cause from the Office of one of the 12. Chief Burgesses and Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid unjustly and have amoved in contempt of us and to the no little damage and grievance of him the said Iames and the hurt of his Estate as we by his complaint have understood We therefore to the said Iames willing due and speedy Justice to be done in this behalf as is just command you and every of you as before time we have you commanded firmly enjoying you That immediatly after the Receipt of this Writ the aforesaid Iames in the aforesaid Office of one of the 12. Chief Burgesses or Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid you restore with all the Liberties Privileges and Commodities to the Office aforesaid belonging and apperteining Or that you signifie the cause thereof unto us least in your default complaint thereof again to us come And how this our Writ shall be executed to us from the day of Holy Trinity in three Weeks wheresoever we shall be England you make it to appear under the penalty of 40. pound this our Writ then sending back c. Witnesse E. Coke at Westminster the 12th day of June in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 13th and of Scotland the 48th By the Term of Trinity Anno 130. Jac. King JAMES Rot. 23. Execution of this Writ doth appear in a certan Schedule to this Writ annexed John Clement Mayor The Answer of the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough of Plymouth to the Writ to this Schedule annexed According to the command of the Writ aforesaid To the Lord the King we most humbly certifie That the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England by her Letters Patents with the great Seal of England sealed bearing date at Westminster the 28th day of February in the 43th yeer of her Reign for her self her Heirs and Successors granted to the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough of Plymouth aforesaid and their Successors amongst other things That the Mayor and Recorder of the Borough aforesaid for the time being the time that they should happen to be in their Offices And further the Predecessors of the said Mayor then alive and for the time being and their Successors should be Justices of the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors to keep the Peace in the said Borough and within the Limits Precincts and Liberties thereof and to be kept and to cause to be conserved and kept without any Command Commission or Warrant for the same to be had or to be obteined And further to the said Lord the King we certifie That
within the Borough aforesaid there is and time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary there was a Usage and Custom That the Mayor and 12. chief Burgesses of the same Borough stood and were of the private Council of the Borough aforesaid and 24. of the other most discreet Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid for the time being to this chosen and sworn stood and were together with the aforesaid Mayor and 12. Chief Burgesses of Common Council of the Borough aforesaid for the regulating and government of the same Borough And that every such Burgesse who was chosen into the fellowship of the 24. Burgesses of the Common Council aforesaid before he was to be admitted to the said fellowship should take corporal Oath before the Mayor of the same Borough for the time being that he should carry himself well and honestly as well towards the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being and to them from time to time should shew Reverence and that he should maintein and uphold the Liberties and common Profit of the Borough aforesaid with his best Counsel and Advice And further we Certifie That every one of the aforesaid 12. Chief Burgesses from time to time chosen should be preferred by the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid or the rest of the aforesaid 12. Chief of the Burgesses or by the greater part of them for the time being only without the consent or assent of the aforesaid 24. the other Burgesses who are as before is said of the Common Counsel of the Borough aforesaid to this required And further we Certifie That the aforesaid James Bagg the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 32th was duly chosen and appointed one of the aforesaid 24. of the Burgesses of the Common Council of the Borough aforesaid then being and the said first day of May in the 32th yeer aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid took Corporal Oath before the Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid according to the antient Custom aforesaid That he the said James would carry him well honestly as wel towards the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being as towards the other 12. chief Burg. of the said Borough for the time being and to them from time to time would shew Reverence and the Liberties and Common profit of the Borough aforesaid would maintain and uphold with his best Counsel and advise And further to the Lord the King we Certifie That the aforesaid Borough of Plymouth is situate so neer to the shore and Sea Coasts That by reason thereof and by reason of the daily meeting there of Ships and Vessels there coming as well from the parts beyond the Seas as from elsewhere many ill minded men as well Allens within born of evil and perverse conversation contemners of good Government and disturbers of the Peace in the Ships and Vessels aforesaid thither coming in the Borough aforesaid and within the Liberties and Precincts of the same staying and remaining are daily found who can hardly be there brought to the obedience of good Rule and Government unlesse the Authority of the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being and of the other Chief Burgesses aforesaid with due reverence of the other Burgesses and Inhabitants of the said Borough be fortified and the Persons of the said Chief Burgesses and of the Mayor from the contempt of the vulger be preserved And further to the said Lord the King we certifie That the aforesaid James Bagge not ignorant of the premises little regarding his Oath aforesaid and the Authority as well of the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being as his late Predecessors aforesaid as the other the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid setting naught by and labouring and intending to bring the same Authority into contempt The first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th the said James being then one of the Common Counsel of the Borough aforesaid and one of the Chief Burgesses of the same Burough in the presence of one Robert Trelawny then being Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and of many other of the Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid within the Burrough aforesaid contemptuously and malapartly carried himself as well in gesture as in words toward the Mayor aforesaid and then and there to the aforesaid Robert Trelawny contemptuously and scoffingly without any reasonable cause these words following openly and publickly said and spake that is to say You the aforesaid Robert Trelawney intending are some Prince are you not And further to the said Lord the King we certifie That afterwards that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 7. the aforesaid James Bagge continuing his evil disposition and intention aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Robert Trelawny then being a Justice of the Peace of the aforesaid Lord the King within the Burrough aforesaid to be kept by reason of Mayrolty of the Burrough aforesaid the yeer then last past by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid and in the presence and hearing of very many other of the Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid openly publickly and with a loud voice without any reasonable cause these words following contemptuously falsly and scandalously said and spake that is to say you the aforesaid Trelawny intending are a Cosening Knave whereas in truth the said Robert Trelawny all his life time honestly and from all suspition of any falsity fraud or deceit lived altogether unspected and in the Offices as well of the Mayriolty as of Chief Burgesse of the Burrough aforesaid with praise carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we do Certifie That the 20th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 7th The aforesaid James Bagge continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid seditiously and malitiously stirred up and perswaded one Thomas Shervil then being of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid That he the said Thomas would joyn himself with the aforesaid James Bagge in a conspiracy to amove and depose One John Battersby then being Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid from his Office of Mayriolty without any reasonable or lawful cause and then and there malitiously and contemptuously spake to the aforesaid Thomas Shervill of the aforesaid Thomas Battersby these words following that is to say Master Mayor the aforesaid John Battersby intending carrieth himself foolishly in this place And if you will joyn with me we will turn him out of his Mayriolty and choose a wiser Man in his place Whereas in truth the aforesaid John Battersby during the whole time of his Mayriolty aforesaid in the executing of his Office aforesaid carried himself well and discreetly and with great
Integrity and gravity And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That afterwards that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 8th the aforesaid James Bagg continuing in his evil disposition and intent aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid in the Guild-hall of the Borough aforesaid in the presence of one Thomas Fowens then being Mayor of the Borough aforesaid in the presence and hearing as well of the Chief Burgesses as of the other Inhabitants of the Borough aforesaid scornfully and without reasonable cause spake to the aforesaid Thomas Fowens these false and injurous words following that is to say Thou the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then Mayor intending art an Insolent Fellow whereas in Truth the said THOMAS in the whole course of his Life bore himself towards all Men Honestly Civily and with Praise And further to the said Lord the King we certifie that the afterwards that is to say the first day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th at Plymouth aforesaid in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens and of very many other of the Burgesses of the Burough aforesaid being gathered together in the Guild Hall of the Burough aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid divers contemptible words of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then being Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid with a loud voice spake and uttered upon which the aforesaid Thomas Fowens with mild words admonishing the aforesaid James Bagg that he would desist from uttering such contemptible words aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg thereupon then and there that is to say the 10th day of August in the 9th yeer abovesaid at Plymouth aforesaid and in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and very many other of the Burgesses and Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and in contempt and disdain of the said Thomas Fowens then Mayor turning the hinder part of his Body in an unhumane and uncivil manner towards the aforesaid Thamas Fowens scoffingly contemptuously and uncivily with a loud voice said to the aforesaid Thomas Fowens these words following that is to say come and Kâ—ss And further to the said Lord the King we certifie that afterwards that is to say the 20th day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 19th at Plymouth aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg with most arrogant words threatned the said John Fowens then being Mayor oâ— the Burrough aforesaid without any reasonable cause and then and there to the said John Fowens threatningly and malitiously spake the words following that is to say I will make thy neck crack And further to the said Lord the King we certify that afterward that is to say the third day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 12th A certain Order and friendly Instrument of admonition was made by Iohn Scobb Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and the greater part of the Chief Burgesses of the same Burrough in these words that is to say The 9th day of May 1614. the day and year above written It was agreed by John Scobb Mayor and such other of the Maisters here under written that if Mr. Iames Bagg the Elder do not before the next sâ—ssions to be holden within the Burrough of Plymouth Reconcile himself to the said Mayor and his brethren for such wrongs as he hath committed against them and withall faithfully promise to demean himself more orderly temperately for the time to come that then he shall be clean removed from the Bench and a new Master chosen in his Room which Order or Instrument was made and subscribed by the said Mayor and other of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That the aforesaid James Bagg before the aforesaid next sessions in the Order aforesaid mentioned did not make any such reconciliation or promise of Conformity as in the Order aforesaid is specified although full notice of the aforesaid Order immediately after the making thereof before the aforesaid next sessions was given to him at Plymouth aforesaid And further to the said Lord the K. we Certifie that afterwards that is to say the 20th day of Febr. in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the K. that now is the 12th the afores Jam. Bagg continuing his evil dispositioÌ„ in his intent aforesaid at Plymouth afores in the Guild-hall of the Borough aforesaid in the presence hearing of John Scobb one of the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid And then being a Justice for the keeping of the Peace within the Borough aforesaid by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid by reason of his Mayralty of the Borough aforesaid the yeer then next before and in the presence and hearing of the then Mayor of the Borough aforesaid and of diverse other of the Burgesses and Inhabitants of that Borough contemptuously these words following spake uttered of the aforesaid John Scobb openly and publickly falsely and scandalously that is to say You the aforesaid John Scobb intending are a Knave whereas the aforesaid John Scobb honestly and with praise carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That afterwards that is to say the 10th day of December last past then the Mayor of the said Borough and diverse of the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid being assembled together in the Almes-house of the said Borough to require and receive an Account of the Overseers of the Borough of the Borough aforesaid as in times past and time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary it was used the aforesaid James Bag then and there in the presence and hearing of the said Mayor and other of the Chief Burgesses aforesaid without any reasonable cause openly and publickly sayd to the said Thomas Shervill there then present and one of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid and for the space of 10. yeers then last past being these false and scandalous words following that is to say You the said Thomas Shervill intending are a seditious Fellow whereas in Truth the aforesaid Thomas Shervill alwaies lived not suspected of any such crime of Sedition and from time in the Office of Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid as in the place and Office of Chief Burgesse Honestly Discreetly and with great Integrity carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That whereas the said Lord the King the day of January in the 12th yeer of his Reign aforesaid at Westminster in the Counâ—y of Middlesex with the Advise of the Lords of his Privy Council of this his Realm of England Ordained and Commanded by publick Proclamation and by Letters written under
the proper Hands of diverse of the Lords of his Privy Council sealed That none nor any person w 〈…〉 soever should kill or put to sale any Flesh for Victuals in the time of Lent then next following contrary to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm And that all Mayors and other Head Officers in Burroughs and Towns Corporate within this Kingdom of England in the beginning of the time of Lent then next coming or before should cause all Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers within the precinct of their Jurisdiction to be bounden to the Lord the King by Bond that they should not dâ—esse any Flesh for Vâ—ctuals all the said time of Lent then next following And whereas afterwards that is to say the 20th day of February in the 12th yeer aforesaid One John Clement then and yet Mayor of the Burrough of Plymouth aforesaid according to the duty of his Place and in Obedience of the said Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King sent to all the Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers aforesaid within the precinct of the Burough aforesaid that they become bound by their Writing to the use of the said Lord the King according to the Tenor and Exigency of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the saâ—d Lord the King the due Execution of the Ordinance aforesaid in that behalf required and endeavored within the Burrough aforesaid The aforesaid James Bagg well knowing the premises and continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid At Plymouth aforesaid endeavoured and attempted to hinder and make void the due Execution of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King And to that purpose the same 20th day of February at Plymouth aforesaid to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and other of the Kings leige People then being and having then and there speech with the aforesaid James Bagg of and upon the businesse aforesaid openly and publickly spake and uttered these words following that is to say Master Mayor meaning the said John Clement doth more herein than he need and more than he can well Answer Meaning that the said John Clement in requiring the aforesaid Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-Keepers to become bounden to the use of the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King had done more than was needful and more than he could well Answer By reason of which speech diverse Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse Keepers dwelling within the aforesaid Burrough utterly refused to be bounden to the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King and farther we certifie that the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough of Plymouth and their predecessors time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary had and used to have within the Burrough aforesaid a certain Custom of Wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine Wite payable by every Taverner selling Wine within the Burrough afores of which Custom of Wine aforesaid the Mayor and Comminalty from the whole time aforesaid quietly and peaceably were possessed of until the aforesaid Ja. Bagg the 29th day of Nov. in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 4th at â—lym afores perfidiously maliciously practised with William Benâ—ly and Thomas Lyde being Taverners and Sellers of Wine within the Burrough aforesaid to them revealing divers secret counsels concerning the common profit of the Burrough aforesaid and them the said William and Thomas then and there perswaded that they no more should pay the aforesaid custom of wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine-wite nor any summ of money for the same to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty which very day the 29th day of November in the 4th yeer aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg being then one of the 12. Chief Burgesses of common Council of the Burrough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid perfidiously and maliciously spake to the said William Bently and Thomas Lyde these words that is to say you need not pay the Money meaning a certain Farm by them the said William and Thomas for the Custom aforesaid before then to â—he aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty payable for the Wine-weight any longer except you list for it is not due unto them By reason of which perfidious and malicious words the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde utterly refused to pay and yet do refuse and by reason thereof diverse Strifes and Controversies are risen and hereafter are like to arise betwixt the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde and the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty for the Custome of Wine aforesaid and the Farm aforesaid to the great damage and prejudice of the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie that the aforesad James Bagg the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 12th and diverse other days and times then before at Plymouth aforesaid persidiously said to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and to other the leige people of the said Lord the King upon Communication between them and the aforesaid James Bagg then before had of and concerning the liberties and Privileges of the Burrough aforesaid that he the said James Bagg would overthrow and make void the Charter of the Town aforesaid meaning the Charter aforesaid by the aforesaid Late Queen Elizabeth to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty as before is said granted And that he the said James the liberties privileges of the Burrough aforesaid would call in question and the same Privileges and Liberties overthrow And further to the Lord the King we Certifie that afterwards that is to say the 17th day of April now last past the aforesaid James Bagg in the said Writ named for the Causes aforesaid by the Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough aforesaid from the Office of one of the Chief Burgesseâ— and Magistrates of the Burrough aforesaid was amoved c. John â—lement Mayor SCIRE FACIAS Pleas before the Lord the King that now is in his Chancery at Westminster in the County of Middlesex Hillary Term in the yeer of the Lord King JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th fol. 1. The PRINCES Case THE Lord the King that now is sent his Close Writ to the Sheriff of Cornwall directed in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sheriff of Cornwall greeting Whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. in the yeer of his Reign the 11th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex holden made amongst other things it was Enacted by Authority of the said Parliament That the Eldest Son of the King
of England who should be Inheritable to the Kingdom of England should be Duke of Cornwall and that the Dutchy of Cornwall should be from thenceforth to the Eldest Son of the Kings of England who should be next Heir of the aforesaid Kingdom And that the aforesaid Eldest Son of the Kings of England should have and enjoy towards their Maintenance and support of their Princely State All the whole Dutchy of Cornwall and all Castles Honours Lordships Manors Lands Tenements and all and singular Hereditaments to the said Dutchy belonging or appertaining or reputed or taken to be part parcel or member of the same Dutchy And whereas the said late King Edward the 3d. in the aforesaid Parliament in the yeer of his Reign the 11th aforesaid by his certain Charter with the common Assent and Counsel of the Prelates Earls Barons others of the said Knigs Council in the said Parliament called together And by Authority of the said Parliament had given to Edward then Earl of Chester his Eldest Son the name and Honour of Duke of Cornwall and him in the Dutchy of Cornwall established And by the same his Charter with the common Assent and Counsel aforesaid gave and granted to the said his Son in the name of the Dutchy aforesaid and under the name and Honour of Duke of the said place amongst other things The Castle of Wallingford with its Hamblets and members and the yeerly Farm of the Town of Wallingford with the Honours of Wallingford of St. Walerico with the Appurtenances in the County of Oxford and other Counties wheresoever the said Honors were To have and to hold to the same Duke and of him and his Heirs Kings of England Eldest Sons of the same place Dukes in the Kingdom of England inheritable successively together with Knights Fees Advowsons of Churches Abbies Priories Hospitals Chapels and with Hundreds Fishings Forrests Chases Parks Warrens Fairs Markets Liberties Free Customs Wards Reliefs Escheats and Services of Tenants as well free as villains and all other things to the aforesaid Castles Towns Honors Lands and Tenements howsoever belonging or appertaining of the aforesaid King Edward the 3d. and his Heirs for ever And the said late King Edward the 3d. by his Charter aforesaid in Parliament aforesaid with the common Consent aforesaid and by Authority of that Parliament the aforesaid Castle of Wallingford and other the premises with their Appurtenances amongst other things to the said Dutchy annexed and united to remain to the said Durchy for ever So as from the said Dutchy at any time by no means they be separated nor to any other or others then to the Dukes of the same place by the aforesaid late King or his Heirs should be given or any wayes granted so also that to the aforesaid Duke other Dukes of the same place derasing and to the Son or Sons to whom the aforesaid Dutchy by colour of the Grants aforesaid it should belong not appearing the said Dutchy with the aforesaid Castle and other the premises being granted to the aforesaid late King or his Heirs Kings of England should retorn in the Hands of him the said late King and of his Heirs Kings of England to be holden until any of such Son or Sons of the said Kingdom of England Heirs successive should appear as is aforesaid to whom successively the said Dutchy with the Appurtenances the aforesaid late King for him and his Heirs granted and would to be delivered to be holden of the said King and his Heirs for ever And whereas likewise By a certain Act made in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th holden at Westminster aforesaid that is to say in the second Session of the same Parliament begun and holden the 12th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord late King Henry the 8th the 31th and by diverse Prorogations continued until the 25th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 8th the 32th and from thence holden and continued until the dissolution of the said Parliament the 24th day of July in the 32th yeer aforesaid Reciting That whereas in the Parliament holden in the 11th yeer of the Reign of the late King of famous Memory King Edward the 3d. amongst other things established It was Enacted and Ordained That the Eldest Son of the King of England who should be Inheritable to this Kingdom of England should be Duke of Cornwall and that the same Dutchy of Cornwall should ever be to the Eldest Son of the King of England who should be next Heir of the said Kingdom And that he should have and enjoy towards the Mainteinance and support of his Princely Estate the whole Dutchy of Cornwall and all Honours Dominions Manors Lands Tenements and all other Hereditaments belonging or appertaining to the said Dutchy or reputed or taken to be part parcel or Member of the said Dutchy And for that The Honour and Castle of Wallingford in the County of Berks then was long time had been part and parcel of the Inheritance and Possessions of the said Duke of Cornwall and reputed and taken to be a member of the said Dutchy Which Manor and Castle lay neer to the Manor of the said late King Henry the 8th of Newelm otherwise Ewelm in the County of Oxford and was very commodious decent and pleasant of the said late King Henry the 8th In consideration whereof and for other urgent causes the said late King Henry the 8th especially moving It was Enacted and Ordained by the Authory of the same Parliament of the said late King Henry the 8th That the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all Dominions Manors Land Tenements and Hereditaments whatsoever they should be being parts parcels or members of the said Honour and Castle or appendant or belonging to the said Honour and Castle or to any Lordship or Manor to the same appertaining or reputed or taken to be part or parcel of the said Honor and Castle or any member thereof should be from thenceforth for ever by authority of the said Parliament severed disannexed and dismembred from the said Dutchy of Cornwall and should not be in any manner from thence after reputed called accepted or taken by the name of the Honour of Wallingford nor be any part parcel or member of the said Dutchy of Cornwall And that the aforesaid Manor of the said King of Newelm otherwise Ewelm from thence for ever after should be named called accepted and be reputed and adjudged to be the Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm And that the said late King Henry the 8th should have and enjoy the like Liberties Franchises Privileges Royalties and Jurisdictions as well in the aforesaid honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm as in the aforesaid Mannors Castle Lands Tenements and Hereditaments being part parcel or member of the said Honor of Wallingford to all intents purposes as were in any manner belonging apertaining or used in or to the
King Henry the 8th afterwards at Westminster aforesaid died the said Edward late Prince being the Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th And the said Edward late Prince to the said King Henry the 8th in the aforesaid Kingdom of England by right of Inheritance succeeded and King of the aforesaid Kingdom of England by the name of Edward the 6th King of England came to be And afterwards the said Edward the 6. late King of England at Westminster aforesaid dyed without Heir of his body begotten the Lady Mary late Queen of England being his Sister and heir of the said late King Edward the sixt and the aforesaid Lady Mary to the said late King Edward the sixt in the aforesaid Kingdom of England by right of Inheritance succeeded and became Queen of the aforesaid kingdom of England and afterwards the said Queen Mary at Westminster aforesaid died without heir of her body begotten the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England being Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary the aforresaid Lady Elizabeth to the said late Queen Mary in the aforesaid kingdom of England by right of Inheritance Succeeded and became Queen of the kingdom of England And afterwards the said Queen Elizabeth at Westminster aforesaid dyed without Heir of her Body begotten We then and yet being Cosin and Heir to the said late Queen Elizabeth and we succeeded the late Queen Elizabeth in right of Inheritance in the same Kingdom of England and became and now are King of England and now the most Excellent Prince Henry our Eldest Sonn now Duke of Cornwell hath requested us that whereas the aforesaid Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England by her letters Patents Sealed with the great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the second day of May in the yeer of her Reign the 37th granted at Gellio Merick then Esquire now Knight now deceased and Henry Lindley then Esquire now Knight the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances to have and to hold to them the said Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley and their Heirs for ever as in the Letters Patents thereof more fully it is conteyned And whereas the aforesaid Manors of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph to the aforesaid Dutchy as is said annexed and united to the same now Duke by Colour of the gift grant and union aforesaid by the authority of Parliament aforesaid belonged and yet ought to belong and were member and parcel of the same Dutchy and yet are as the said pious Prince and Duke by waies and means convenient is ready to shew That we would the said Letters Patents aforesaid of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph as before is said made revoke and annull and the said Manors with their appurtenances seize into our hands that we cause the said Manors to the said now Duke as members and parcel of the Dutchy aforesaid to have and to hold according to the form and effect of the guift grant and union aforesaid to be delivered We willing to do in this behalf what is Just Command you that by good and Lawfull men of your Bayliwick you give warning to the aforesaid Henry Lindley Knight and John Hele Knight Serjeant at Law Tenants of the said Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph and also to whosoever other or others are Tenants of the said Mamors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph or any of them that they be before us in our Chancery in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary next coming whensoever it shall be to shew what for us and themselves they have or can say Wherefore the Letters Pattents aforesaid of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the appurtenances as before is said made ought not to be revoked and annulled and the said Manors with the appurtenances into our hands be seised as before is said to the now Duke as members and parcel of the Dutchy aforesaid according to the form and effect of the gift grant and union aforesaid to have and to hold to be delivered and to do and receive what our said Court then and there shall further grant in this behalf Witness my self at Westminster the 18th day of November in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the third and of Scotland the 39th and now at this day that is to say the aforesaid 8 dayes of Saint Hillary before the said Lord the King that now is in his said Court of Chancery here cometh Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who prosecuteth in his behalf for the said Lord the King in his proper person And Francis Godolphin Knight being Sheriff of the County of Cornwell now sendth here the Writ aforesaid served executed in form following the 21. day of Dec. in the 3d. yeer aboves by virtue of the writ afores to him directed that he gave warning by Joh. Edgecombe Wal. Blant good Lawfull men of his Bayliwick to the afores Hen. Lindley Kt. and also the same day and yeer by the said good and Lawfull men he gave warning to the aforesaid John Hele Knight and to one Warwick Hele Knight Tenants of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph above mentioned to be before the said Lord the King that now is here at this day to shew do and receive what that Writ in it requireth and demands And the aforesaid Henry Lindley Knight John Hele Knight and Warwick He le Knight the 4th day of pleas being called by Richard Wilkinson their Attorny come and pray Licence to Imparl and it is graunted to them c. and upon this day is given to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele before the said Lord the King in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid until in 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary then next c. wheresoever c that is to say to the aforesaid Henry John and Warwick to imparl and then to answer c. The same day is given to the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight the Atorney General of the Lord the King that now is who c. then to be here c. At which 8. days from the Purification of the blessed Lady Mary before the said Lord the King in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aâ—oresaid come as well the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorney aforesaid and upon this the said Henry John and Warwick by their Attorney aforesaid pray farther License thereof to imparl before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid until in 15. days of Easter then next following c. wheresoever c. and then to answer c. and have it c. and the same
day is given to the aforesaid Edward Coke Kt. the Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. then here c. At which 15. dayes of Easter before the the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid come as well the aforesaid Edward Coke Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and VVarwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid and upon this the aforesaid Henry John and VVarwick by their Attorney aforesaid further pray Leave thereof to Imparl before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say At West aforesaid until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity then next following wheresoever c. And then to Answer c. have it c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. then here c. At which Morrow of Holy Trinity before the Lord the King that now is in the said Court c. that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come as well the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. in his proper person As the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid And upon this The said Henry John and Warwick by their Attorny aforesaid pray further license thereof to imparl before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid until the Morrow of All Souls then next following wheresoever c. And then to Answer c. And have it c. And the same day is given to Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. then here c. At which Morrow of All Souls before the Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come as well Henry Hobert Knight then Attorny General of the said Lord the King who for the said Lord the King that now is prosecutes in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and VVarwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid Upon which the said Henry Lindley by his Attorny aforesaid prayeth the hearing of the said Writ of Scire Facias above mentioned and it is read unto him c. Which being read and heard The said Henry Lindley saith That neither the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid made ought to be revoked or annulled not the said Manors into the Hands of the said Lord the King ought to be seized Because he saith That there is not any such Record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid King Ednard the 3d. made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias above thereof is rendred and specified Nor is there any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of the Parliament aforesaid above recited and specified as in the said Writ of Scire Facias above is recited and specified And this the said Henry is ready to aver Wherefore he demands Judgement if the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the Manors aforesaid with their Appurtenances so as before is said made ought to be revoked or annulled or the said Manors with the Appurtenances to be seized into the Hands of the said Lord the King that now is c. And the aforesaid John Hele and VVarwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid By Protestation That there is not any Record of any such Act of Parliament of the said 11th yeer of Edward late King of England the 3d. nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the foresaid late King Edwâ—rd the 3d. by Authority of Parliament aforesaid as in the said of Writ Scire Facias is mentioned For Plea they say That neither the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lady Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid made ought to be revoked or annulled or the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances be seized into the Hands of the Lord the King thâ—t now is or any of them ought to be seized c. Because they say That the aforesaid late Lady Queen Elizabeth before the making of the Letters Patents aforesaid to the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lâ—ndley was seized in her demesn as of Fee in the Right of her Crown of England of the aforesaid Manors of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias mentioned and expressed and so thereof being seized The said late Queen Elizabeth by her Letters Patents under the great Seal of England sealed bearing date at Westminster in the yeer of her Reign the 37th and here in Court brought In consideration of the good true faithful and acceptable Service to the aforesaid Lady the Queen by her then well-beloved and faithful Cosen and Counsellor Robert late Earl of Essex of the most Noble Order of the Garter Knight and Master of her Horse before that many times done and performed as for other good causes and considerations the said late Lady the Queen then specially moving As also at the humble request of the said late Earl of Essex of her special grace certain knowledge and meer motion gave and granted the Manors aforesaid with their Appurtenances amongst other to the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley then Esquires and afterwards Knights To have and to hold the said Manors with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley their Heirs and Assigns forever And the aforesaid late Lady the Queen by the same her Letters Patents granted for her her Heirs and Successors That the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley their Heirs and Assigns should have and enjoy the aforesaid Manors with the Appurtenances according to the intent of the said late Queen in the said Letters Patents conteined And that the said Letters Patents should be firm valid good sufficient and effectual in Law against the said Lady the Queen her Heirs and Successors as well in all her Courts as elsewhere within the Kingdom of England without any manner of Confirmations Licenses or Tollerations of the said Lady the Queen her Heirs and Successors then forever by the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley or their Heirs or Assigns to be procured or obteined Notwithstanding the Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th in the 37th yeer of his Reign made Concerning the Dutchy or Cornwall Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm as in and by the said Letters Patents
c. By virtue of which the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Lindley into the aforesaid Manors with their Appurtenances entred and were thereof seized in their demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized By their Writing indented made between the aforesaid late Earl of Essex Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley of the one part and Augustine Steward and Michael Corsellis on the other part bearing date the 26th day of Decem. in the yeer of the Rign of the said late Lady Q. Elizabeth the 38th in the Court of Chancery of the aforesaid late Queen at VVestminster aforesaid within 6. Moneths then next following according to the form of the Statute thereof made and provided in due manner of Record inrolled as well in Consideration of the sum 3500. pounds to the aforesaid late Earl of Essex by the aforesaid Augustine Steward and Michael Corsellis paid as for 20. shillings to the said Gellio and Henry by the aforesaid Augustine and Nicholas likewise paid bargained and sold to the aforesaid Augustine and Michael the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances To have and to hold to the said Augustine and Michael their Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Bargain and Sale and Inrollment and by force of a certain Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th Of transferring uses into possession at Westminster aforesaid holden made and provided the aforesaid Augustine and Michael were seized of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said Augustine and Michael in consideration of the sum of 3500. pound to the aforesaid Augustine and Michael by the aforesaid John Hele paid afterwards of the said Manors with the Appurtenances enfeoffed them the said John Hele then Serjant at Law and the aforesaid Warwick He le then Esquire now Knight To have and to hold to the said John and VVarwick and to the Heirs and Assigns of the aforesaid John to the sole and proper use and behoof of the aforesaid John and Warwick and the Heirs and Assignes of the said John Hele for ever By virtue of which Feoffment The aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Hele were and yet are seized of the aforesaid Manors with the Appurtenances that is to say The said John Hele in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid Warwick in his Demesn as of Free hold for the term of his life And the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Hele further say That afterwards in and by a certain Act of Parliament of the aforesaid late Queen at VVestminster aforesaid the 27th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said late Queen Elizabeth the 43th holden made amongst other reciting That whereas the said late Queen from the 8th day of February in the yeer of her Reign the 25th as well for diverse and great sums of Mony as for diverse other several considerations had bargained sold given and granted by diverse her Letters Patents Indentures or other Writings under the great Seal of England sealed or the Seal of the Dutchy of Lancaster or the Seal of the County Palatine of Lancaster as well to Bodies Politick and Corporate as to diverse and several other Subjects of the said Lady the Queen diverse and several Honors Manors Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and other Hereditaments in Fee Simple Fee Tail for Term of Life Lives or Yeers as by the said several Letters Patents Indentures and other Writings are mentioned and declared It was enacted by Authority of the same Parliament To the intent that the said Letters Patents Indentures and other Writings should be of good available and perfect force and effect to all and singular the said late Queens Subjects according to the true intent and effect of the same That as well all and singular Letters Patents Indentures and other Writings sealed under the great Seal of England or under the Seal of the Dutchy of Lancaster or the Seal of the County Palatine of Lancaster before then made and granted by the aforesaid late Queen for any sum or sums of Mony whatsoever or for or upon any other considerations whatsoever from the aforesaid 8th day of February in the 25th yeer aforesaid as all other Letters Patents then after by the said late Queen to be made for any sum or sums of Mony or other considerations before the last day of the said then present Session of the said Parliament And moreover All other Letters Patents within the space of one yeer then next following to be made by force or according to the true puport or true meaning of a Condition under the great Seal of England then in being for the Sale of the Land of the said late Queen to any Body Politick or Corporate or to any other person or persons whatsoever of any Honors Castles Manors Lordships Granaries Messuages Lands Tenements Meadows Pastures Rents Reversions Services Woods Advowsons Nominations Patronages Annuities Rights Interests Entries Conditions Leases Courts Liberties Privileges Franchises or of any other Hereditaments with the Appurtenances or of any part or parcel thereof with or under the Great Seal of England or under the Great Seal of the Dutchy of Lancaster or the Seal of the County Palatine of Lancaster of whatsoever Kind Nature or Quality they or any of them are or were reputed known or taken with the Appurtenances or any part or parcel thereof should be good perfect and effectual in Law and should stand be taken reputed esteemed and should be adjudged to be good certain perfect available and effectual in the Law against the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors according to the tenor and effect of the aforesaid Letters Patents and Indentures or other Writings and that the same should be expounded construed esteemed and should be adjudged most beneficially for those to whom the aforesaid Letters Patents and Grants thereof so are made the Heirs Assigns Executors Administrators of them according to the words and purport of the said Letters Patents Indentures or other Writings without any Confirmations Licenses or Tollerations of the said late Queen her Heiâ— or Successors any ill naming ill reciting or not reciting of the said Honors Castles Manors Lands Tenements or other the premises or of any part thereof or any defect in finding of Office or Inquisition of and in the premises or any part thereof by which the Title of the said late Lady the Queen of and in the premises ought to be found before the publishing of the aforesaid Letters Patents Indentures or other Writing or any ill reciting or not reciting of Demises thereof made as well of Record as not of Record or any ill reciting or not reciting or not true mentioning in any such Lettets Patents Grants or Writings of the Estate or Estates of the said late Queen of Freehold or Inheritance of and in the premises or any part thereof to which the
said late Queen after the beginning of her Reign was or then after should be intituled by any Attainder Escheat Conveiance or Assurance whatsoever and in which Letters Patents Grants or Writings no Estate Tail then before made or supposed to be made was recited or from henceforth should be and the Reversion or Remainder thereof expectant in the said Letters Patents Grants or Writings granted or mentioned to be granted or any defect of certainty or ill computing mistaking rating or setting forth of the yeerly value or rate of the premises or yeerly Rents reserved of and for the premises or any parcel thereof mentioned or conteined in the same Letters Patents aforesaid or other Writings or for that that the premises then were or any part thereof valued at a greater or lesser value in the said Letters Patents or Writings than the said Manors Lands Tenements and other premises then were or were in yeerly value or any misnaming or not true naming of Town Hamblet Parish or County where the said Honors Manors Lands Tenements Rents Hereditaments and other the premises and every part thereof or any parcel thereof lay or were or any defect of true naming of the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments or any parcel thereof or of the Nature Kind Quality or Quantity of the aforesaid Possessions or Hereditaments or of any parcel thereof or any default of true naming of any Corporation or any default of Attornment Livery or Seisin or any ill naming of any the late Tenants of the aforesaid Honors Manors lands Tenements and Hereditaments or of any part thereof so sold granted or given or any ill naming of any person or persons Bodies Politick or Corporate who any time before the making of such Letters Patents were or then after should be proprietors of the premises or any any part thereof to the contrary notwithstanding as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appearh And the said John Hele and Warwick further say That the said late Queen Elizabeth never had any Son And that the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Liâ—dley were at and before the time of the making of the said Leters Patents so as before is said made Subjects of the said late Queen Elizabeth and born at Westminster aforesaid All and singular which The said John Hele and Warwick are ready to aver Whereupon they demand Judgement if the said Letters Patens of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances so as before is said made ought to be revoked and annulled or the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any of them ought to be seized into the Hands of the Lord the King that now is c. And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. present in Court in his proper person As to the aforesaid Plea of the said Henry Lindley above in form aforesaid pleaded for the said Lord the King saith That the said Henry Lindley ought not be admitted to plead That there is not any such Record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid Lord King Edward the 3d. made Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of Parliament made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof is recited and specified Because he saith That the said Lord King JAMES now King of England saw the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the said late King Edward the 3d. and of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. in the Rolls of the Chancery of the King that now is within his Tower of London in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. the 11th inrolled upon Record there remaining The Tenor of Inrollment of which Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid the said JAMES now King of England by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England sealed here in Court by the aforesaid Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is now brings in Court bearing date at Westminster aforesaid the 5th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th Exemplified amongst other things Which Exemplification as to the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid followeth in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. To All to whom these present Letters shall come greeting We have seen the Inrollment of a certain Charter bearing date the 17th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 11th To his well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester his Eldest Son granted in the Rolls of our Chancery within the Tower of London remaining of Record in these words Edward by the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Aquitain To the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Justices Sheriffs Provosts Ministers and all Bayliffs and his faithful People Greeting Amongst other the tokens of Honour of our Kingdom we esteemed it the chiefest that the Order of Dignities and Offices of our Kingdom be fortified with the best and strongest Counsels Therefore there being many degrees of Inheritance in our Kingdom where by descent the Inheritance according to the Law of this Kingdom to Co-heirs and Parciners and for want of such issue and such like events the same came to our Hands We therefore desiring to beautifie our Kingdom and in best manner to defend our Kingdom and the holy Church thereof and our Subjects and Kingdoms against the endeavors and Adversaries thereof and considering and looking that Peace between us and Subjects be maintained and to dignifie the Places of honour of our Kingdom And taking into our consideration the person of our well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester our Eldest Son and taken to Honour the same our Son the name and Honour of Duke of Cornwall with the common consent and counsel of the Prelates Earls Barons and others of our Counsel in this present Parliament at Westminster upon Monday next after the Feast of Saint Mathew the Apostle last past being assembled we have given and made him Duke of Cornwall and girt him with a Sword as behoveth And that there may be no doubt hereafter what or how much the same Duke or other Dukes of the same place who for the time shall be in the name of the said Dutchy ought to have Our Will is that all in specialty which to the said Dutchy doth beloug be inserted in this our Charter Therefore for us and our Heirs we have given and granted and by this our Charter confirmed to the same our Son under the name and Honour of Duke of the said Place The
be taken and seized And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. As to the said Plea of the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Helc by them above in form aforesaid pleaded for the said Lord the King saith That that Plea and the matter therein conteined is not sufficient in Law to maintain That the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph ought not to be revoked and annulled or that the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances into the hands of the said Lord the King that now is ought not to be seized To which Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded The said Attorny General for the said Lord the King needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to Answer And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Plea of the said John Hele and Warwick Hele in this behalf The said Attorny General for the said Lord the King demandeth Judgement and that the said Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made be revoked and annulled And the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances be taken and seized into the Hands of the Lord the King c. Upon which the aforesaid Henry Lindley saith That the Plea of the aforesaid Attorny General for the said Lord the King that now is to the Plea of the said Henry Lindley above by Replication pleaded and the matters therein conteined are not sufficient for him the said Henry Lindley to say That there is not any such Record of any such Act of parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof is recited and specified Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of the Parliament aforesaid made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof above is recited and specified to Bar And that the said Henry Lindley to that Plea in manner aforesaid by Replication pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to rejoyn And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Replication in his behalf the said Henry Lindley as at first demandeth Judgement If the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made ought to be annulled or the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances or any of them ought to be taken seized into the hands of the Lord the King that now is And the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Hele for themselves say that in as much as they sufficient matter in their plea aforesaid by them above pleaded have alleged that is to say the aforesaid seisin of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Tauuton Treloâ—ia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England and the grant aforesaid by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the said late Queen and the rest of the Matters by them above pleaded which the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick are ready to aveâ— which matter the aforesaid Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but the same averment to admit altogether refuseth as at first demand Judgment if the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made ought to be revoked and annulled or the said Manors with the Appurtenances or any of them in the hands of the said Lord the King that now is ought to be taken or seised And farther for the better information and to more fully inform the said Lord the King that now is and the Court here of the State of the said Lord the King that now is to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall and to other Manors to the said late Dutchy any maner of way belonging or annexed or part or parcel thereof The said John and Warwick say that in the Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 7th held at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 7th day of November in the first yeer of his Reign made amongst other things ordayned It was enacted and established by authority of Parliament that the said Lord King Henry the 7th should have hold enjoy and possess to him and his Heirs for ever from the 21th day of August then last past the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwal and all and singular Honors Castles Lordships Manors Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services Poffessions Advowsons and other Hereditaments with all and singular their members and appurtenances to the aforesaid Dutchy belonging and appertaining or which were belonging annexed reputed or taken parcel of the same any time of the Reigns of Henry the 6th Edward the 4th late Kings of England in as ample and large manner with all liberties Franchises and other things to the same belonging in like manner form and condition as the aforesaid Kings or either of them had held occupied used or enjoyed or had held occupied was used and enjoyed in the same in any time during the said Kings Reigns as in the Statute aforesaid in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th the first abovesaid amongst other things it is more fully contained and appeareth By which the said King James now King was and yet is seised of the rest of the Manors Lands and Tenements to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall belonging by the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth not aliened in his demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England whereupon they pray that the Court here take knowledge and notice of the aforesaid Statute in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry 7th the first abovesaid made and of the aforesaid Statu te of the said Lord the King that now is to the rest of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwal belonging they would take and accept c. And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Attorny General of the aforesaid Lord the King that now is who c. as to that whereupon the aforesaid Henry Lindley above demurreth in Law in as much as he sufficient matter in Law for the said Lord the King to bar the aforesaid Henry Lindley from saying that there is not any such record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. made nor any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the said late King Edward the 3d. by authority of Parliament aforesaid made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias
thereof it is recited and specified above alleged which matter the aforesaid Henry Lindley doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but that averment to admit utterly refuseth the said Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is demandeth Judgment and that the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made be revoked and annulled and that the said Manors with the Appurtenances into the hands of the Lord the King that now is be taken and seised c. And because the Court of the Lord the King that now is here will avise off and upon the premises before it proceedeth to Judgment thereof day is given as well to the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. as to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here untill in 8. days of St. Hilary next c. wheresoever c. to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Court hereof thereof not yet c. At which day of 8. days of Saint Hillary that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come as well the aforesaid Henry Hobart Knight Attorney General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid and upon this the Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is as at first demandeth Judgment and that the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the appurtenances in form aforesaid made be revoked and annulled and that the said Manors with the Appurtenances into the hands of the Lord the King that now is be taken and seised c. And because the said Court of the Lord the King that now is here will farther avise before that it proceed to Judgment thereof day farther is given as well to the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. as to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele here untill in 15 days of Easter next c. wheresoever c. to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Court of the Lord the King that now is here thereof not yet c. SCIRE FACIAS Easter Term. 2i Eliz. Râ—t 1. The Record of the Case of Mark Steward vouched in Co. 9th part in Sr. Georege Reynels Case fol. 99. b. MEmorandum that Thomas Bromley Knight Chauncellor of the Queen Monday next after the Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by his own hand delivered here into the Court a certain Record before the Lady the Queen had in her Chancery in these words Pleas before the Lady the Queen at Westminster in the Term of Easter in the yeer of the Reign of Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. the 21th Middlesex ss It is manifest that the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King and Queen of England Sister of the Lady the Queen that now is for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady Queen Mary by the Letters Patents of them the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary made under the great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the 23th day of September in the 3. and 4th yeer of the said late King Philip and Mary gave and granted to one Mark Steward gen the Office of Sergeant at Arms of them the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary attendant upon her Chauncellor of England for the time being and made ordayned and appointed by the said Letters Patents him the said Mark their Sargeant at Arms to have and enjoy the said Office to the said Mark for the Term of his life and that the said King Philip and Queen Mary for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Queen Mary by the same Letters Patents gave and graunted to the said Mark for the exercising and occupying the said office aforesaid the wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day To have hold and receive yeerly the said wages and Fee of 12. pence to the said Mark for the Term of his life of the Issues and profits of the Hamper of the said late King Philip and Queen Mary by the hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the aforesaid Hamper for the time being yeerly to be paid as by the said Letters Patents amongst other it more fully appeareth By colour of which Letters Patents the said Mark was seised of the Office aforesaid as of Freehold for the term of his life And whereas also it is found by a certain Inquisition Indented taken at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex the 24th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th before Kalph Hurlestone Esquire John Muthal Esquire Francis Folyat Esquire and John Stratham Gent. By virtue of a Commission of the said Lady the Queen that now is to them and to one John Goodman directed by the Oaths of 12. men That the said Mark did not serve in the said Office of Sergeant at Arms according to the effect and Tenor of the aforesaid Letters Patents to him made from the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is unto the first day of February then next past before the Inquisition aforesaid but for all that time absented himself from that Office as by the said Inquisition retorned in the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen as in the files of Record there remaining it appeareth And now at this day that is to say the 7th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now iâ— the 21th coâ—eth the aforesaid Mark Steward into the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen â—ow is at Westminster by Edward Cockel his Attorny and complaineth that â—y reâ—â—on and colour of the Inquisition aforesaid himself to be unjustly removed from the exercising and holding of his said Office aforesaid Because By Protestation that the said Inquisition is not sufficient in Law to â—â—â—â—ve him the said Mark from the exercising of his Office aforesaid â—o â—â—e shewing of his right in this behalf the said Mark saith that the 〈◊〉 Lady the Queen that now is long after the making of the said Letters Patents that is to say the last day of Nov. in the yeer of her Reign the 〈◊〉 at Westminster in the County oâ— Mâ—ll gave liâ—â—nsâ—â—oth â—said Mark 〈◊〉 hâ—â—self from the exercising his Office during the pleasure of him â—â—â— said Mark until he was commanded by her the said Lady
the Queen that now iâ— to serve in his Office aforesaid By virtue of which License of the said Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Mark as afore is said the said Mark by the whole time of his absence specified in the Inquisition aforesaid And 〈◊〉 the â—â—â— Mark for further shewing of his Right saith That he now is and alwâ—â—â—â—om the aforesaid time of removing him from the Exercising of his Offiâ—â— aforesaid was ready and often time offered himself to serve in his Office aforesaid And that as yet from the time of the License of the said Lady the Queen of absenting himself to the said Mark made the said Lady the Queen that now is had not commanded him to serve in his Office aforesaid Without that that the said Lady the Queen that now is hath any other Right or Title in or to the Office aforesaid than as before above it is alleged And without that That there is any such Record besides the Record of the Inquisition aforesaid which makes or shewes or can make or set forth any Title of the said Lady the Queen that now is in or to the Office aforesaid All and singular which the said Mark is ready to aver as the Court here shall award and therefore he demandeth Judgement and that to the possession and exercising of his Office aforesaid together with the Wages and Fee aforesaid and to the issues and profits to the said Office due and belonging from the time of his removing from the said exercising of his Office aforesaid be restored c. And Gilbert Gerrard Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is who prosecuteth for the said Lady the Queen in this behalf saith That by any thing by the said Mark Steward above in pleading alleged The said Lady the Queen of her Right and Title in or to the Office aforesaid ought not to be barred Because he saith That the said Lady the Queen did not give License to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid at the pleasure of him the said Mark until he were Commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his said Office aforesaid in manner and form as the aforesaid Mark in his shewing of his Right to the Office aforesaid above alleged And this the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen that now is for the said Lady the Queen prayeth it be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Mark likewise Therefore day is given before the said Lady the Queen that now is in the Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord wheresoever she should be in England to do and receive what was just in the premises And it is commanded to the Sheriff of Middlesex That he cause to be here before the Lady the Queen at that day 12. good and lawful men of the Vicinage of the City of Westminster who are not of Kindred or Affinity of the said Mark To Recognize upon their Oath more fully the truth of the premises At which Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Geâ—rad who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark Steward by John Manning his Attorny And the Sheriff retorns the names of 12. whereof none c. Thtrefore it is commanded to the Sheriff That he do not omit c. but that he destrein them by all their Lands c. And that of the Issues c. And that he have their Bodies before the Lady the Q. in 8. dayes of the Holy â—rinity wheresoever c. To Recognize in form aforesaid c. And the same day is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward c. At which 8. dayes of the â—oly â—rinity before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark by his Attorny aforesaid And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid being called likewise come And upon this publick Proclamation is made for the Lady the Queen as the use is That if there be any one who will inform the Justices oâ— the Lady the Queen here the Serjeant at Law of the Lady the Queen or the Attorny General of the Lady the Queen or the Jurors aforesaid oâ— the premises that he come and should be heard And Edward Anderson one of the Serjeants of the Lady the Queen at Law to do this offered himself By which it is proceeded to the taking of the Jury aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid now there appearing who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed sworn say upon their Oath That the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King Queen of England by their Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England made bearing date at Westminster the 23th day of September in the yeers of the Reigns of the said late King and Queen the 3d. and 4th Gave and granted to the said Mark the Office of Serjeant at Arms attending upon their Chancellor of England for the time being and made him the said Mark their Serjeant at Arms aforesaid made Ordained and Constituted by the said Letters Patents for the term of his life To have and enjoy the said Office to him the said Mark for the term of his life And moreover the said late King and Queen gave and granted by the Letters Patents aforesaid for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Queen for the exercising and holding of the Office aforesaid the Wages and Fee of 12. pence per diem To have hold and perceive yeerly the said Wages and Fee of 12. pence the day to the said Mark for the term of his life of the issues and profits of their Hamper of their Chancery by the Hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the said their Hamper and the Heirs of the aforesaid late Queen for the time being At the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions yeerly to be paid together with all other Profits Commodities Emoluments Allowances and Advantages to the said Office any way anciently belonging due and accustomed And the said Mark Steward brings here in Court the Letters Patents aforesaid which followes in these words Philip and Mary by the Grace of God King and Queen of England Spain France both Cicilies Jerusalem and Ireland Defenders of the Faith Archdukes of Austria Dukes of Burgondy Milain and Brabant Earl of Haspurge Flanders and Tiroll c. To All to whom these present Letters shall come Greeting Whereas our most dear Brother Edward late King of England the 6th by his Letters Patents made under the Great Seal of England bearing date at Greenwich the 8th day of April in the 4th yeer of his Reign of his special Grace certain Knowledg and meer Motion as also with the Advice and Consent of his Council had given and granted to his well-Beloved Richard Hatchman Gentleman the Office
sworn therein and many years served the place Thus much being on my own knowledge to be true at his humble and earnest sute I thought good to advertise your Lordships and so do bid your Lordships farewell from the Court the 21th day of May 1579. your Lordships loving Friend R. Leicester And the Jurors further say That the aforesaid Augustine Steward brother of him the said Mark the 6th day of January in the 11th year abovesaid at Hampton Court in the County of Middlesex by the said Lady the Queen was admitted ordained and constituted to attend in the place and room of him the said Mark his brother upon Nicholas Bacon Knight then being Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England and to the said Office for in the place and room of him the said Mark well and faithfully to exercise and execute then and there in the presence of the said Lady the Queen was sworn as by the Deposition of the said Augustine Steward which followeth in these words we finde to be true After Christmass and before Hillary Term in the 11th year of her Highness Reign on a Sunday or Holiday her Majesty coming from the Closet at Hampton Court was moved by the Right Honourable deceased Earl of Pembroke for the instituting of Augustine Steward Sergeant at Arms to attend upon the Lord Keeper To whom her Majesty answered My Lord he is not to have his brothers Office but is to be appointed only to attend in his place for him at such time as his brother shall be absent her Majesty making then relation of her favourable License already granted to Mark Steward to abide in the Country and to absent himself from her service at his pleasure until he should by her Majesty be called again to his attendance upon the said Lord Keeper And then the said Augustine was sworn to attend as is above specified By colour of which the said Augustine Steward in the absence of him the said Mark Steward his brother the aforesaid Office of Sergeant at Arms attendant upon the Chancellor of England from thence until the 20th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18th used and executed But whether the said Lady the Queen by word only without Writing sealed can give sufficient License in Law to the said Mark Steward to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant and thereof pray the ayd and advise of the Court here in the premises And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Court of the Lady and Queen here That the said Lady the Queen that now is can by word only without her writing sealed give sufficient License in Law to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid Then the said Jurors say That the said Lady the Queen that now is gave Licence to the said Mark Steward to absent himself from the exercise of his Office aforesaid during the pleasure of him the said Mark until he should be commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his Office aforesaid in manner and form as the said Mark above in pleading alledged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen here That the said Lady the Quâ—en cannot by word only without her Writing sealed give sufficient license in Law to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid Then the Jurors aforesaid say That the said Lady the Queen did not give license to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid during the pleasure of him the said Mark until he should be commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his Office aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof is not yet avised c. Therefore day thereof is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward until in 8. dayes of Saint Michael before the Lady the Queen wheresoever c. in state as now c. to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which 15. dayes from Saint Michael before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark by his Attorny aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof are not yet avised c. Therefore further day thereof is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward until from the day of Saint Martin 15. dayes before the Lady the Queen wheresoever c. in state as now c. to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which 15. dayes from Saint Martin before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the said Mark Steward by his Attorny aforesaid Upon which all and singular the premises being seen and fully understood by the Court here and mature deliberation being had thereof the Queens Serjeant at Law and the Attorny General of the said Queen being called to it and present It was awarded That the said Office of Serjeant at Arms holden in the Hands of the said Lady the Queen be restored to the said Mark And that the said Mark Steward to the exercising and holding of his Office aforesaid from which he was amoved together with the Wages and Fees thereof to the said Office due and belonging from the time of his amoving from the exercising of his Office aforesaid hitherto received and with-holden be restored c. Saving the Right of the Queen if any c. TRESPAS Hillary Term Anno 41. Elizabeth Rott 1049. in the COMMON-PLEAS C. â— part Corbets Case fol. 77. b. ROwland Corbet late of Stokefaston in the County aforesaid Esquire was Leicest attached to answer to Arthur Corbet Gentleman of a Plea wherefore with force and Arms the Close of the said Arthur at Stokefaston aforesaid he broke and his Grasse there to the value of 10. pound growing with certain Cattel Fedd Trod and Consumed and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said Arthur and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. And whereupon the said Arthur by Lawrence Lyter his Attorny complaineth That the said Rowland the 20th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 40th with Force and Arms c. the Close of him the said Arthur at Strokefaston broke and his Grasse there to the value c. there then growing with certain Cattel that is to say with Horses Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms c. to the great damage c. and against the Peace c. Whereupon he saith that he
is the worse and hath damages c. to the value of 20. pound And thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Rowland by William Evering his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. and as to the force and armes saith that he is in nothing thereof guilty And as to the rest of the Trespas aforesaid supposed to be done the said Rowland saith That the aforesaid Arthur his Action thereof against him ought not to have Because he saith That the Close aforesaid as also the place in which it is supposed the Trespasse aforesaid to be done and the time aforesaid in which it is supposed the same Trespasse to be done were 20. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenances in Stokefaston aforesaid called New-Close and that before the time in which c. One Christopher Corbet Esquire Father of the aforesaid Rowland and Arthur was seized of the Manor of Stokefaston with the Appurtenances in the County aforesaid whereof the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. are and the aforesaid time in which c. As also time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary were parcel in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said Christopher before the time in which c. that is to say the 12th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th at Stokefaston aforesaid By a certain Indenture made between him the said Christopher By the name of Christopher Corbet of Stokefaston in the County of Leicester Esquire of the one part and Richard Slade Henry Allin Thomas Hunt and George Noon Gentleman of the other part One part of which sealed with the Seal of the said Christopher the said Rowland brings here in Court whose date is the same day and yeer It is witnessed That the aforesaid Christopher Corbet for and in consideration of Fatherly Love Zeal and Affection which he the said Christopher Corbet bore to the aforesaid Rowland Corbet Eldest Son of the said Christopher and for his Preferment and Advancement and for the Promotion Preferment and Establishment of Living of the said Rowland and the Heirs of his Body lawfully issuing And for and in consideration of Fatherly Love Zeal and Affection which the said Christopher bore to the said Arthur Corbet his other Son and for his Preferment and Advancement of Living And also for and in consideration of the great Love and Affection and Favour which he the said Christopher bore to Francis Corbet Son of Humphry Corbet late of Ratley in the County of Warwick Gentleman deceased his near Cosin and Kinsman and for his Preferment and Advancemement And also for the Establishment Preservation and Continuance of all and singular the Manors Lands Tenements Possessions and Hereditaments whatsoever of him the said Christopher within the Kingdom of England then after in the same Indenture mentioned or contained in the Name and Blood of the aforesaid Christopher and for other good and just causes and considerations him the said Christopher moving By the same Indenture for him and his Heirs Covenanted Granted Condescended and Agreed to and with the aforesaid Robert Slade Henry Allin Thomas Hunt and George Noon their Executors and Administrators and to and with every of them in manner and form after in the said Indenture mentioned That is to say That he the said Christo Corbet his Heirs and Assigns And all and every other person or persons their Heirs and Assigns who then stood or were seized or which from hence forth for ever should stand and be seized of and in the aforesaid Manor of Stokefaston with the Appurtenances in the County of Leicester of and in all other Messuages Lands Tenemnets and Hereditaments whatsoever of the aforesaid Christo Corbet in the said County of Leicester of which he the said Christopher Corbet then had any Estate of Inheritance in Fee Simple in Possession Reversion or Remainder from thence forth afterwards should stand and be seized of and in the aforesaid Manor of Stokefaston and all and singular other the premises with their Appurtenances whatsoever to the uses behoofs intentions or purposes That is to say of and in the aforesaid Manor of Stokefaston with the Appurtenances and other the premises whatsoever with their Appurtenances in the aforesaid County of Leicester unto the use and behoof of the aforesaid Christopher Corbet during his natural life without impeachment of any Waste and after the decease of the said Christopher Corbet Then of and in the aforesaid Manor of Stokefaston with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid County of Leicester And of and in all other Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments of the aforesaid Christopher Corbet whatsoever with all singular their Appurtenances in the said County of Leicester of which or in which he the said Christopher Corbet had any Estate of Inheritance in Fee Simple in possession Reversion or Remainder To the use of the aforesaid Rowland Corbet and the Heirs Males of his Body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue Male to the use of the aforesaid Arthur Corbet the Heirs Males of his Body lawfully begotten for default of such issue male then to the use of the aforesaid Francis Corbet Son of the aforesaid Humph. Corbet deceased the Heirs Males of the Body of the aforesaid Francis lawfully begotten and for default of such Heirs then to the use of the Heirs of the Body of the aforesaid Rowland lawfully begotten and for default of such Heirs then to the use of the Heirs of the Body of the said Arthur lawfully begotten and for default of such Heirs Then to the use and behoof of the Right Heirs of the said Christopher Corbet for ever as by the same Indenture amongst other things more fully appeareth By colour of which as also of a certain Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th Of transferring of uses into possession holden made and provided The aforesaid Christopher Corbet was seized of the aforesaid Manor of Stokefaston with the Appurtenances amongst other things in his Demesn as of Free hold for the term of his life the Remanider thereof in form aforesaid expectant And the said Christopher so thereof being seized The said Christopher afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the last day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th abovesaid at Stokefaston aforesaid dyed of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid seized After whose death and before the time in which c. The said Rowland Corbet into the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee Tail that is to
of the aforesaid Arthur in manner and form aforesaid above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to maintain the said Arthur to have his Action aforesaid against him and that he to that Replication in form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor is bound by the Law to Answer And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Replication in this behalf The said Rowland demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid Arthur from having his Action aforesaid against him be barred c. And the aforesaid Arthur in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to have and maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Rowland above by Replication hath alleged which matter the aforesaid Rowland doth not deny nor to the same any wayes answereth but that averment utterly refuseth to admit as at first demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespass aforesaid to him to be adjudged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the said Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until from the day of Faster 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises further day is given to the parties here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judement thereof Day is given to the parties here in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day further is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet At which day here cometh as well the said Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this the Plea aforesaid being seen as also the Plea of the aforesaid Arthur above by Replication pleaded and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the same Justices here that that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded is not sufficient in Law to maintain the said Arthur to have and maintain his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Rowland Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Arthur take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but be in Mercy for his false clamour and that the aforesaid Rowland thereof go without day c. Afterwards that is to say the 30th day of Aprill in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 42th The Record and Processe of the Plaint aforesaid with all the same by virtue of a Writ of the said Lady the Queen for Correcting Errors whose date is at Westminster the 12th day of Aprill in the 42th yeer aforesaid to Edmond Anderson Knight directed and the aforesaid Defendant touching before the said Lady the Queen wheresoever c. are sent c. TRESPAS Easter Term Anno 21. ELIZABETH Rot. 58. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 1. part Shelleys Case fol. 88. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say in Hillary Term Sussex last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came Nicholas Wolfe by Nicholas Mosley his Attorny And brought in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against Henry Shelley Esquire of a Plea of Trespass are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo Ric. Roo which Bill followeth in these words that is to say ss Sussex ss Nicholas Wolfe complaineth of Henry Shelley Esquire in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Lady the Queen her self being of that That he the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is of England the 20th with force and Arms c. The Close and House of him the said Nicholas called Barhamwick otherwise Barhamweek at Augmering in the County aforesaid broke and entred and his grass there to the value of 100. Marks there late growing with certain Cattel that is to say Horses Oxen Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said Nicholas 100. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute c And now at this day that is to say Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter this Term until which day the said Henry Shelley had leave to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to Answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Henry Shelley by Richard Best his Attorny and the said Henry doth defend the force and injury when c. And saith He is not thereof guilty And of this puts himself upon the Country And the said Nicholas likewise c. Therefore a Jury thereof is to come before the Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Friday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. Afterwards the Processe thereof is continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put thereof between them in respite before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until the day of June next after 3. Weeks of Easter then next following for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid being called likewise come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the time of the Trespass supposed to be done The Lord Henry late King of England the 8th Father of the Lady the Queen that now is amongst other things was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid above specified in his Demesn as
the said Sheriff Pledges for prosecuting that is to say John Doo Richard Roo and that the aforesaid Edward was summoned by John Den and Richard Fen. And the said Edward Shelley according to his summons aforesaid to him in form aforesaid made by Thomas Ingler his Attorny came And upon this the aforesaid Richard Cooper and William Martin by their Attorny aforesaid demanded against the aforesaid Edward Shelley the Manors of Worminghurst Barhamwick and Fyndon with the Appurtenances as also 30. Messuages 10. Tofts one Water-Mill 2. Dove-houses 30. Gardens 400. Acres of Land 60. Acres of Meadow 400. Acres of Pasture 120. Acres of Wood 500. Acres of Furz and Heath and 8. pound 10. shillings Rent with the Appurtenances in Fyndon Worminghurst Barhamwick Patching Estangmering Westangmering Wighenholt Sterrington VVashington Ashington Grenested Asherest Stening Wiston Thackham and Shipley As also the Advowson of the Chutch of VVorminghurst as his Right and Inheritance and which the said Edward had not Entry but after Disseisin with Hugh Hunt unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Richard and William within 30. yeers then last past c. And whereupon they said that they themselves were seized of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and Right and also of the Advowson of the Church aforesaid as of Fee and Right in time of Peace in the time of the said late King and Queen taking the Profits thereof to the value c. And in which c. And thereupon brought Sute c. And the said Edward by the aforesaid Thomas Ingler his Attorny cometh and defendeth his Right when c. And voucheth thereof to warranty Henry Siliborn who present here in his proper person in Court freely the Manors and Tenements and Rents aforesaid to him doth warrant c. And upon that The aforesaid Richard and William demanded against him the said Henry Tenant by his warranty the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid in form aforesaid And whereupon they said That they themselves were seized of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with their Appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and Right and also of the Advowson aforesaid as of Fee and Right in time of Peace in the time of the said late King and Queen taking thereof the Profits to the value c. And in which c. And thereof brought Sute c. And the aforesaid Henry Tenant by his warranty defended his Right when c. And said That the aforesaid Hugh did not disseise the aforesaid Richard and William of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances And also of the Advowson aforesaid as the said Richard and William by their Writ and Declaration above supposed And of this put himself upon the Country c. And the aforesaid Richard and William prayed leave to imparl and had it c. And afterwards the said Richard and William Retorned back hither into Court the same Term by their Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Henry although solemnly called did not retorn but in Contempt of the Court departed and made default Therefore it was granted by the Court in the aforesaid 8. dayes of Saint Michael That the said Richard and William should recover their seisin against the aforesaid Edward of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances And also of the Advowson aforesaid And that the said Edward should have of the Lands of the said Henry to the value c. And the said Henry should be in Mercy c. And upon this immediatly the aforesaid Richard Cooper and William Martin in the aforesaid Court prayed the Writ of the Lord and Lady the Queen to the then Sheriff of Sussex to be directed to give them full seisin of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and also of the Advowson aforesaid and the Writ was granted unto them bearing date the 9th day of October in the yeers of the Reigns of the aforesaid late King and Queen Philip and Mary the first and second abovesaid Retornable here from the day of Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the Tenements aforesaid called Rarhamwick in the Declaration aforesaid specified and the Tenement aforesaid called Barhamwick in the Record of the Recovery aforesaid above mentioned are one and the same Tenements and not others nor divers And that the Recovery aforesaid was for the intentions in the aforesaid Indenture specified And that the said Edward Shelley dyed the 9th day of October in the yeers of the Reigns of the said late King and Queen the first and second between the hours 5. and 6. in the Afternoon of the same day And that afterwards that is to say the 19th day of October then next following the then Sheriff of the said County of Sussex That is to say Thomas Saunder Knight by virtue of the VVrit aforesaid gave full seisin to the aforesaid Richard Cooper and William Martin of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and also of the Advowson aforesaid And further the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That one Richard Belchamber the aforesaid time of the death of the aforesaid Edward and at the time of the Recovery aforesaid and the Execution thereof and long before the bringing of the aforesaid VVrit of Entry Sur Disseisin in the Post was Tenant of the Tenements aforesaid and possessed of the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid specified for the Term of divers yeers then to come by reason of a Demise thereof made to the aforesaid Richard Belchamber by the aforesaid Edward Shelley long before the bringing of the aforesaid VVrit of Entry Sur Disseisin in the Post And afterwards that is to say the 4th day of December in the yeers of the Reigns of the aforesaid late King and Queen the first and second the aforesaid Henry Shelley the now Defendant was born of the said Ann his Mother late the VVife of the aforesaid Henry Shelley Father of the said Henry Defendant which said Henry the Father was the Eldest Son of the aforesaid Edward Shelley And that the aforesaid Mary Shelley was then alive and in full Life And that the aforesaid Richard Shelley afterwards after the Expiration of the said Term of yeers Demised to the aforesaid Richard Belchamber by the aforesaid Edward Shelley as before is said that is to say the 9th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Augmering aforesaid into the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid specified entred and then and there demised the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration mentioned to the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe To have and to hold to the said Nicholas and his Assigns from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past until the end and Term of 21. yeers
from thence next following fully to be compleated By virtue of which Demise The said Nicholas into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant the aforesaid 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 20th aforesaid with force and Arms c. the Close and House aforesaid brake and entred and the Grasse aforesaid with his Cattel was eaten trodden and consumed in manner and form as the aforesaid Nicholas above against him declared And they pray the Advise of the Lady the Queen here And if upon the whole matter aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen here That the Entry of the aforesaid Henry into the Tenements with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said Nicholas be a good and a lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Henry is not guilty of the Trespass aforesaid in manner and form as the said Nicholas Wolfe now Plaintiff above in pleading hath alleged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Court of the Queen here That the Entry of the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the aforesaid Nicholas be not a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant is guilty of the Trespass aforesaid in manner and form as the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe above against him complaineth And they assesse the damages of the said Nicholas by occasion of that Trespass above his Costs and Charges by him about his Sute in this part expended to 20. shil and for his costs and charges to 40. shil And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to â—ear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement is not yet avised of and upon the premises Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at WESTMINTER until Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here is not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after 18. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Friday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises fully understood mature deliberation thereof being had For that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said Nicholas is a good and lawful Entry in Law Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false Clamour be in Mercy And the aforesaid Henry Shelley go thereof without day c. TRESPAS Michaelmasse Term Anno 27. 28. ELIZABETH in the KINGS-BENCH Rot. 58. Co. 1. part Albanyes Case fol. 107. MEmorandum That upon Saturday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael Middles this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came John Greendon Gentleman by William Goldsmith his Attorny and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen there his Bill against Thomas Albany in the Custody of the Marshal c. of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Middlesex ss John Greendon Gentleman complaineth of Thomas Albany in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey before the Queen her self being For that That he the first day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27th with force and Arms c. the Close of him the said John at Willesdon broke and entred and his Grass to the value of 10. pound there then growing with certain Cattel that is to say Horses Oxen Cows and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said John and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Thomas Albany cometh by Anthony Felton his Attorny and defendeth the force and injury when And as to the coming with force and arms and whatsoever is against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is saith That he is not thereof guilty and of this puts himself upon the Country And the said John likewise c. And as to the rest of the Trespass supposed to be done The said Thomas saith ought not to have or maintain his Action against him because he saith That the place in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done containeth and at the time in which c. did contain in it self 20. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenaaces in Willesdon aforesaid and as to any Trespass in five
Acres parcel of the said 20. Acres the said Thomas saith That long before the time in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done one Francis Bunny was seized of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture in which c. in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say The first day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 20th by his Deed of Feoffment here into Court brought bearing date the same day and year enfeoffed one Miles Hilycock of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said Miles and his heirs for ever to the use of the said Francis for the term of the life of the said Francis and after the death of the said Francis to the use of one David Bunny and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten and for lack of such issue to the use of Nicholas Bunny and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten and for lack of such issue to the use of Walter Bunny and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten and for lack of such issue to the use of Stephen Bunny and his heirs for ever By vertue of which Feoffment and by force of certain Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th of transferring uses in possession holden made The aforesaid Francis was of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Freehold the remainder thereof after the death of the aforesaid Francis to the aforesaid David and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Nicholas and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Walter and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Stephen and his heirs for ever exptctant and the aforesaid Francis so of the aforesaid 20. acres with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized the remainder thereof to the aforesaid David in form aforesaid expectant The said Francis afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 21th enfeoffed one Richard Tomson of the aforesaid 20. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances To have and to hold to the said Richard his heirs and assigns for ever By vertue of which the said Richard was of the said 20. acres of Pasture with their appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee by colour whereof and for that the said Feoffment was made to the disinheriting of the said David the said David in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Feertail the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Nicholas and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the said Walter and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Stephen and his Heirs for ever And the aforesaid David so thereof being seized the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant the said David afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 22th at Willesdon aforesaid demised the aforesaid five acres of Pasture of the aforesaid 20. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. parcel To one Adam Blunt to have and to hold to the said Adam from the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel last past until the end and term of one year from thence next following and fully to be compleat By vertue of which the said Adam Blunt into the said five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and the said Adam so being thereof possessed afterwards and before the time in which enfeoffed the aforesaid Thomas Albany of the said five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances To have and to hold to the said Thomas his heirs and assigns to the proper use and behoof of him the said Thomas his heirs and assigns for ever By colour of which the said Thomas was of the said five arces of Pasture with the Appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid John Grendon claiming the said five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances by colour of a certain Deed of Demise to him thereof made for the term of his life by the aforesaid Miles Hitchcock whereas nothing of the said five acres of Pasture in the possession of the aforesaid John Grendon by the said Deed ever passed in the aforesaid five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances before the time in which c. entred upon whose possession of the said John thereof the said Thomas Albany afterwards that is to say the aforesaid time in which c. into the aforesaid five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances entred and the grass there then growing with the cattel aforesaid fed trod and consumed as it was lawfull for him to do and this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth judgement if the aforesaid John Grendon his action aforesaid against him ought to have or maintain c. And as to any Trespass in the aforesaid 15. acres of Pasture residue the said Thomas Albany saith that the aforesaid John Grendon his Action aforesaid thereof against him ought not to have or maintain because he saith That the aforesaid David long before the Trespass aforesaid supposed to be done being seized of the aforesaid 15. Acres of Pasture in his Demesn as of Fee tail as before is said before the time in which c. that is to say the second day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 22th aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid by a certain Indenture between the said David and the aforesaid Thomas Albany made bearing date the same day and year and in the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid within six moneths then next following in due manner of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided one part of which sealed with the Seal of the said David the said Thomas Albany brings in Court bargained and sold to the said Thomas the aforesaid 15. acres of Pasture residue To have and to hold to the said Thomas and his Heirs for ever by colour of which Bargain Sale and Inrollment the said Thomas Albany of the aforesaid 15. acres of Pasture was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid John Grendon claiming the said 15. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances by colour of the said Deed of Demise to him thereof
male by the aforesaid Christopher Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 6th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And for default of such Issue to the use of the 7th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the Body of the aforesaid 7th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use of the 8th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Chudley Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 8th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And for default of such Issue to the use of the 9th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the Body of the aforesaid 9th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use of the 10th Issue male Lawfally to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 10th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And if it should happen the aforesaid Christopher to dy without Issue male of his body Lawfully to be begotten then the aforesaid Feoffees and every of them their Heirs and Assigns should stand and be seised of and in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things to the use and behoof of the aforesaid Thomas Chudleigh another Son of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and the Heirs of his body Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use and behoof of the aforesaid Oliver Chudleigh another Son of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and the Heirs of his body Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use and behoof of the right Heirs of the said Richard Chudleigh Knight for ever as by the said Indenture Quadrupartite amongst other things more fully it appeareth By colour of which Feofment and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 4th day of February in the 27th yeer of his Reign at Westminster in the County of Middlesex of transferring uses in possession there holden made and provided the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh was seised of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof amongst otherthings as the Law requireth And the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. so being seited the same Richard before the within written time in which c. that is so say the 17th day of November in the yeers of the Reigns of the aforesaid late King and Queen Philip and Mary the 5th and 6th dyed and that neither at the time of the death of him the said Richard Chudleigh and before the day of the bringing of the Bill within written there was any Heir of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh of the bodies of any the aforesaid Mary Elizabeth Emlem Johan and Lawrence Lawfally begotten And that after the death of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and before the time in which the aforasaid John Sentleger Giles Strangewaies John Wadham John Gilbert Themas Carew Richard Bampfield John Bridgway Robert Fulford Thomas Williams John Eveleigh and William Hole into the Manors aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things entred and were thereof possessed or seised as upon the whole matter aforesaid the Law requireth and so thereof being possessed or seised Christopher Chudleigh after the death of the aforesaid Richard before the within written time in which c. took to wife Christian Sracheley and that the aforesaid John Sentleger Giles Strangewaies John Wadham John Gilbert Thomas Carew Richard Bampfield John Ridgeway Robert Falford Thomas Williams John 〈◊〉 and William Hole of the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things in form aforesaid possessed or being seiâ—â—â— before the within written time in which c. that is to say The â—ath day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that nâ— was the first the said Oliver Chudleigh then living being in full life by their writing sealed with their Seals and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the same day and yeer freely and without any Consideration amongst other things enfeoffed the aforesaid Christopher Chudleâ—gh then and before having notice of the making of the aforesaid Qâ—â—dâ—upâ—tite Indenture and of the uses in the same conteined To have and to hold the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things To the said Christopher his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only â—â— behoof of the said Christopher his Heirs Assigns for ever By virtue of wâ—â— Feoffment The said Christopher Chudleigh was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof amongst other things as the Law requireth And so thereof being seized The said Christopher Chudleigh before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the third had issue of his Body lawfully begotten one Stretchlâ—y Chudley his first Son And that the said Christopher Chudleigh afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is had another issue of his Body lawfully begotten that is to say one John Chudleigh his second Son And the aforesaid Christo Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seized The said Christopher afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the first day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 6th by his writing indented sealed with his seal and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the said first day of July in the 6th yeer abovesaid And afterwards that is to say the â—th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 6th abovesaid before Robert Dennis Knight one of the 〈◊〉 of the said Lady the Queen for the County aforesaid and George 〈◊〉 Esquire Clerk of the Peace of the said County to be kept assigned â—s the deed of the said Christopher acknowleledged and according to the form of the Statute in such such case made and provided inrolled in consideration of 220. pound to him by one John Chichester Knight before then paid bargained and sold to the said John Chichester the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have to hold to the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns forever to the only use and behoof of the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever And that the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh moreover before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that
now is the 6th abovesaid by his deed sealed with his Seal and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the said 6th day of July aforesaid of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. Enfeoffed the aforesaid John Chichester To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. To the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only use and behoof of the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever And by the said deed aforesaid The said Christopher granted for him and his Heirs That he and his Heirs the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesaid John Christopher his Heirs and Assigns to the only use and behooâ— of the said John Christopher his Heirs and Assigns against all Men would warrant and defend by the said deed as by the said deed more fully appeareth By virtue of which Fefeoffment and of which aforesaid Bargain and Sale the aforesaid John Chichester was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth And so living thereof seized The aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh aftewards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the first day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 12th dyed being the aforesaid Stretchly Chudleigh Eldest Son and Heir of the said Christopher and John Chudleigh his second Son And afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said â—ady the Queen that now is the 13th The said Stretchley Chudleigh dyed without issue of his Body begotten the said John Chudleigh Brother and Heir of the said Strechley then living and in full life being that is to say at Tawstock aforesaid in the County aforesaid And that the aforesaid John Chudleigh after the death of the aforesaid Stretchley his Brother was and yet is Heir of the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh his Father And the said John Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seized The said John Chichester before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 7th of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. enfeoffed one Philip Chichester Gentleman To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the said Philip Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only use of him the said Philip Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Feoffment the said Philip Chichester was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth And that the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. is and the within written time in which c. as also from the whole time aforesaid was customary Land of the Manor aforesaid and demised and demisable by Copy of Court Roll of the Manor aforesaid by the Lord or his Steward of the Manor aforesaid for the time being to any person or persons who were willing to take the same for Term of Life or Lives at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor aforesaid And the aforesaid PHILIP Chichester of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth c. Being seized before the time within which c. That is to say the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 15th At the Court of his Manor aforesaid then holden at the said Manor of Hescot aforesaid of his own delivery the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things to the aforesaid John Frayne granted for the Term of his Life at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor aforesaid By virtue of which grant the said John Frayne before the time in which c. entred and was thereof seized as the Law requireth c. And so thereof being seized the said John Chudley being Heir as before is said of the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh before the within written time in which c. That is to say the 11th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 28th in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Philip Chichester thereof entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth c And so being possessed before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 11th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is Of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof enfeoffed the aforesaid William Dillon To have and to hold that Manor with the Appurtenances whereof to the said William Dillon his Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Feoffment before the time in which c. The said William Dillon into the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said John Frayne thereof entred and him the said John Frayne from his possession thereof expelled and amoved and was thereof seized as the Law requireth until the aforesaid John Frayne the within written 16th day of November into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said William Dillon thereof entred and the Grasse then and there growing with the Gattel within written fed trod and consumed and continued the same from the aforesaid 16th day of November in the 29th yeer aforesaid until the within written 8th day of February the 30th yeer within written But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the aforesaid John Frayne be guilty of the Trespasse within written or not the Jurors aforesaid are ignorant And thereupon pray the Advise and Discretion of the Court c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Frayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William Dillon thereof be not a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Frayne is guilty of the Trespasse within written as the aforesaid VVilliam Dillon above against him complaineth And then they assesse the Damages of the said VVilliam by occasion of that Trespasse above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this part expended to 4. pence And for his costs and charges to 20. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here
That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John â—rayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid VVilliam Dillon thereof be a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Frayne is not guilty of the Trespasse within written as the aforesaid John Frayne within hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet a vised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after one Moneth of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid here in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of their Judgement thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after three Weeks of Saint Michael to hear their judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next afer 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Thursday in the Feast of St. Martin to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Tuesday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the blessed Mary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Q. at West come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Que. at Westminster until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen until from the day of Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following wheresoever c. At which day the Plea aforesaid was further adjorned by another Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the said
Lady the Queen until the Morrow of All Souls then next following At the Castle of Hertford At which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hertford come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hertford until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminstrr until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day The Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Cōmon Adjornment before the Lady the Queen until the day from Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following At the Town of Saint Alban in the County of Hertford At which day the Plea aforesaid by another Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment was adjorned before the said Lady the Queen until the Morrow of All Souls then next following at the aforesaid Town of St. Alban At wch day before the Lady the Q. at the aforesaid Town of St. Alban come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at the aforesaid Town of Saint Alban until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here therof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by another Writ of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen from the aforesaid Town of Saint Alban until the said 8. dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster aforesaid At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestmin come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until VVednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day further is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westmin come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Que. here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which all singular the premises being seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here well understood and diligently looked into mature deliberation being thereof had because it seemeth to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Frayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William Dillon thereof is a good and lawfull Entry It is granted That the aforesaid William Dillon take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamour be in mercy c. And the aforesaid John Frayne thereof go without day c. TRESPAS Trinity Term Anno 24. ELIZABETH Rot. 928. in the COMMON-PLEAS Co. 2. part Thoroughgoods Case Fol. 5. b. WIlliam Cole late of Great Paringdon in the County aforesaid Gent. Essex was attached to answer to William Thoroughgood of a Plea wherefore with force and arms the Close and House of him the said William Thoroughgood at great Paringdon he brake and his grass there
demandeth Judgement if the aforesaid William Thoroughgood his Action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And the aforesaid William Thoroughgood as to the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid VVilliam Cole to the Trespass aforesaid in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances of new Assignment done above in Bar thereof pleaded saith That he for any thing in the said Plea before alledgeth from the having his action aforesaid ought not to be barred Because he saith That the aforesaid Fine was had and levied to the use and behoof of the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth and the heirs of the said VVilliam upon the Condition that the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth and the Heirs and Assigns of the said VVilliam Chicken well and truly should deliver and pay to the said VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes and their Executors and Assigns 8 l. of good and lawfull money of England and four Quarters of Malt at the Mansion house called Barrowes in Paringdon aforesaid yearly during the natural lives of them the said VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes and the longer liver of them at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel and the Feast of the Anunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions and also upon condition That the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth and their Heirs or Assigns should pay to the said VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes their Executors Administrators or assigns 76. l. 13. s. and 4. d. of like lawfull money of England at the aforesaid Mansion house called Barrows in form following that is to say at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the year of our Lord God 1568. three pound six shillings eight pence and so at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangels at the Mansion House aforesaid three pound six shillings eight pence yearly untill the aforesaid summ of seventy six pound 13. s. and 4. d. should be fully satisfied and paid and for the not payment doing and performing of the aforesaid Conditions according to the true intents and meanings of the same Condition the aforesaid Fine and other the conveyance aforesaid to be made were to the use and behoof of them the said William Thoroughgood and Agnes as in their former estate by colour of which Fine the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth were seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Apurtenances of new assigned amongst other things that is to say the aforesaid VVilliam in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid Elizabeth in her Demesn as of Freehold for term of her life upon the Conditions aforesaid And further the said VVilliam Thoroughgood by Protestation that the said William Chicken and Elizabeth did not pay do or perform any thing according to the form and effect of the Conditions aforesaid For Plea saith That the aforesaid William Chicken and Elizabeth or either of them did not pay or either of them pay to the said William Thoroughgood and Agnes or either of them 3. l. 6s 8d of good and lawful money of England at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel on the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18th Which to them at the said Feast of St. Michael they ought to have paid according to the form and effect of the aforesaid first Condition by which the aforesaid William Thoroughgood by vertue of the Fine aforesaid and by force of a certain Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at VVestminster the fourth day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th holden made and provided of transferring uses in possession was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances of new assigned amongst other things in his Demesn as of Fee and in the Tenements aforesaid of new assigned entred and the aforesaid William Cole the day and year in the Declaration aforesaid above specified with force and Arms c. the Close and House of him the said William Thoroughgood in the aforesaid Tenements of new assigned broke and the grass aforesaid there then growing with his cattel aforesaid was fed trod and consumed as he the said William against him complaineth and this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the said William Cole doth acknowledge the Trespass aforesaid in the same Tenements of new assigned done as abovesaid The said William Thoroughgood demandeth Judgement his damages by the occasion of that Trespass to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid William Cole by Protestation That the Fine aforesad was not levyed to the use of the said William Chicken and Elizabeth upon the Conditions aforesaid as the aforesaid William Thoroughgood above alledgeth For Plea saith That after the Fine aforesaid Levied that is to say the second day of September in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 18th at Great Paringdon aforesaid the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood by his Writing of the Lease which the said VVilliam Cole with the Seal of the said VVilliam Thoroughgood Sealed here in Court brings whose Date is the same day and year by the name of VVilliam Thoroughgood of Hansdon in the County of Hertford Yeoman Remised Released and for him and his Heirs for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken by the name of William Chicken of Hansdon aforesaid Yeoman All and all manner of Conditions Entries for Conditions broken and demands whatsoever from the beginning of the World unto the day of the Date of the said Writing of Release and this he is ready to aver whereupon as at first he demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid William Thoroughgood be barred from having his Action aforesaid against him c. and the aforesaid William Thoroughgood saith That he is a Layman and unlearned and that at the time of the making of the Writing of Release supposed to be done divers arrerages of the aforesaid yeerly payments above recited in form aforesaid to be paid were behind and that the aforesaid Writing of Release was then read and declared to him as a Writing of Acquittance of all arrerages of monies to him in form aforesaid to be paid then to the said William Thoroughgood being behind and not paid only By which the said William Thoroughgood believing that Writing to be a Writing of Acquittance of the arrerages of the monies aforesaid only sealed and delivered the said Writing to the aforesaid William Chicken and said William Thoroughgood saith That the said Writing in Court here brought containing in self him the said William Thoroughgood to have Remised Released and for him and his He is for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid VViliam Chicken all and all manner of Conditions Entries for Conditions broken and Demands whatsoever from the beginning of the world until the day of the date of the said Writing of Release is not his Deed And he prayeth that this may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid William Cole likewise Therefore it is commanded
assembled That the said late King should have hold possess and enjoy to Him his Heirs and Successors all and singular such late Monasteries Abbies Priories Nunneries Colledges Houses of Fryers and other Ecclesiastical and Religious Houses and places of what kinds natures qualities or diversities of Habits Rules Professions or Orders they or any of them were named known or called which after the fourth day of February in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late King the 27th were dissolved suppressed renounced relinquished forfeited given up or by any other means came to his Highnese and by the same Authority and in like manner should have hold possess and enjoy all Scites Circuits Precinctts Mannors Lordships Grainges Messuages Lands Tenements Meadows Pastures Rents Reversions Services Woods Tithes Pensions Portions Rectories Appropriated Vicaridges Churches Chapels Advowsons Nominations Patronages Annuities Rights Interests Entries Conditions Commons Leets Courts Liberties Priviledges Franchises and other whatsoever Hereditaments which appertained or belonged to the said late Monasteries Abbathies Priories Nunneries Colledges Hospitals Houses of Fryers and other Religious and Ecclesiastical Houses and Places at the time of the aforesaid dissolution suppressing renouncing forfeiting giving up or by any other manner of means came to the said Kings Highnesse after the 4th day of February above mentioned And further it is Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That not only all the singular the aforesaid late Monasteries Abbathies Priories Nunneries Colledges Hospitals Houses of Fryars and other Religious and Ecclesiastical Houses and Places Scites Circuits Precincts Manors Lordships Grainges Messuages Lands Tenements Meadows Pastures Rents Reversions Services and all the singular other the premises from thence immediatly and presently but also all other Monasteries Abbathies Priories Nunneries Colledges Hospitals Houses of Fryars and all and singular other Ecclesiastical and Religious Houses which hereafter should happen to be dissolved suppressed renounced relinquished forfeited given up or by any other means came to the Kings Highnesse And also all Scites Circuits Precincts Manors Grainges Messuages Lands Tenements Meadows Pastures Rents Reversions Services Woods Tithes Pensions Portions Rectories approprate Viccarages Churches Chapels Advowsons Nominations Patronages Hundreds Rights Interests Entries Conditions Leets Courts Liberties Privileges Franchises and other Hereditaments whatsoever were belonging or appertaining to them or any of them whersoever and as soon as they should be dissolved suppressed renounced relinquished forfeited given up or by any other means come to the Kings Highnesse should be vested and adjudged by Authority of the same Parliament in the very actual and real seisin and possession of the said late King his Heirs and Successors for ever in state and condition as then they were And as if all the said Monasteries Abbathies Priories Nunneries Colledges Hospitals Houses of Fryars and other Religious and Ecclesiastical Houses so dissolved suppressed renounced relinquished forfeited given up or came to the Kings Highnesse as aforesaid as also the aforesaid Monasteries Abbathies Priories Nunneries Colledges Hospitals Houses of Fryars and other Religious and Ecclesiastical Houses and Places which then after should happen to be dissolved suppressed renounced relinquished or given up to his said Highnesse Scites Circuits Precincts Manors Lordships Grainges and other the premises whatsoever in the said Act of Parliament specially or particularly recited or expressed by expresse Names Words Faculties and in their Natures Kinds Qualities as in the said Act amongst other things more fully it appeareth And the said Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Monastery or Priory of Bolton aforesaid after the aforesaid 4th day of February in the 27th yeer aforesaid that is to say the 11th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said late King the 31th aforesaid was dissolved By Colour of which Dissolution and by force of the Statute aforesaid That aforesaid late King was seized of the aforesaid Monastery or Priory of Bolton aforesaid and of the Reversion of the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances amongst other things in his Demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England And that the aforesaid Messuage and Tenement called Vngthorp and the aforesaid 4. acres of Lands with the Appurtenances in which c. At the time of the Dissolution aforesaid were parcel of the possessions of the aforesaid Monastery or Priory And the said late King so thereof being seized the 3d. day of April in the 33th yeer of his Reign By his Letters Patents sealed with the Great Seal of England to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence Gave and Granted unto Henry late Earl of Comberland all the aforesaid Tenement Messuage and Farm with the Appurtenances called Vngthorp whereof the within written 4. acres with the Appurtenances adjoyning were and yet are parcel To have and to hold to the said late Earl his Heirs and Assigns for ever By Colour of which Letters Patents The said late Earl was amongst other things seized of the Reversion of the aforesaid Tenement Messuage and Farm with the Appurtenances whereof the aforesaid 4. acres of Lands with the Appurtenances in which c. then were and yet are parcel in his Demesn as of Fee And the aforesaid Hugh and Agnes for the aforesaid Term of yeers in form aforesaid being possessed the Reversion thereof to the aforesaid Earl his Heirs expectant the aforesaid Hugh dyed of the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. in form aforesaid possessed And the aforesaid Agnes overlived him the said Hugh and was of the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. possessed by way of Survivor c. And the aforesaid Agnes so being thereof possessed the Reversion thereof to the late Earl in form aforesaid expectant The said late Earl made sealed and delivered a certain Indenture as his deed of the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other things The Tenor of which followeth in these words This Indenture made the 10th day of September in the yeer of the our Lord God 1545. and in the seven and thirtieth yeer of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord Henry by the Grace of God King of Eng. France and Ire defender of the faith c. in the earth the supream Head of the Church of Engl. Ire Between the Right Noble Lord Henry Earl of Comberland Lord of the Honour of Shipton Lord of Westmerland and Vestion of the one part And Agnes Baldwin or Vngthorp Widow and Anthony Baldwin of the other part Witnesseth That the same Earl for the sum of 58. pound 13. shillings and 4. pence Sterling at the day of the Date hereof by the said Agnes and Anthony paid to the said Earl whereof the said Earl acknowledgeth himself to be truly contented and paid and the said Agnes and Anthony their Heirs and Executors thereof and of every part thereof to be discharged and acquitted for ever Hath Covenanted Granted and to Farm Letten and
That the said Christo the day and yeer in the Declaration above specified entred into the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. upon the possession of the aforesaid Anthony and the Oats within written then there with his Feet trod and consumed as the aforesaid Anthony within against him complaineth But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found The aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Christopher in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. be a good and lawful Entry or not the said Jurors are utterly ignorant And thereof pray the Advise and Judgement of the Justices of the Court here And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Christopher be not a good and lawful Entry in Law in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land upon the possession of the said Anthony Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Christopher is guilty of the Trespass in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land within new assigned as the aforesaid Anthony within against him complaineth And then they assesse the damages of the said Anthony by occasion of that Trespass above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 20. shillings and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Christopher in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land new assigned upon the possession of the said Anthony is a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Christopher is not guilty of the Trespas within written in the within written 4. acres of Land within new assigned And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day come as well the said Anthony as the aforesaid Christopher by their Attorney aforesaid and upon this all and singular the premises being seen and by the Justices c. fully understood It is granted that the aforesaid Anthony recover against the aforesaid Christopher his damages to 3. l. by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid Assessed as also 11. l. 6. s. 8. d. to the said Anthony at his request for his costs and charges by the Court here of increase adjudged which damages in the whole amount to fourteen pound six shillings and eight pence and that the aforesaid Christopher be taken c. TRESPAS Michaelmass Term Anno 36. and 37. ELIZABETH Rot. 136. in the KINGS-BENCH Co. 2. part Tookers Case Fol. 62. MEmorandum that at another time that is to say in the Term of Easter Devon last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came William Rud by Michael Bland his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is then there his Bill against Edward Tooker in the custody of the Marshall c. of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Devon ss William Rud complaineth of Edward Tooker in the custody of the Marshall of the Marshal-Sea of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self for that he the first day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 36th with force and Arms c. the Close and house of him the said William called Bertonland otherwise the Barton of Sprecombe at Morthoe in the County aforesaid broke and entred and his grass of the value of an hundred Marks in the Close aforesaid then late growing with certain Cattel that is to say with Horses Oxen Cows Hogs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said William an hundred pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And now at this day that is to say VVednesday next after eight dayes of Saint Michael this Term until which day the aforesaid Edward had leave to impart to the said Bill and then to Answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid William by his Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward by John Halstaff his Attorney And the said Edward defendeth the force and injury when c. and saith that he is not thereof guilty and of this puts himself upon the County and the aforesaid William likewise c. Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff that a Jury come before the Lady the Queen at Westminster Friday next after 15. days of St. Hillary c. and who neither c. to recognize c. Because as well c. the same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Afterwards the Process is continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors thereof betwixt them put in respite of the Plea aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter then next following unless the justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned first upon Monday the 10th day of March at the Castle of Exeter in the County aforesaid by form of the Statute c. come for want of jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the aforesaid justices to Assizes before whom c. sent their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edmond Anderson Knight Chief justice of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Thomas Walmesley one of the justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench justices of the said Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County of Devon to be taken assigned by form of the Statute c. come as well the within named William Rud by Erasmus Ford his Attorny as the within written Edward Tooker by Thomas Clayton his Attorny And the jurors of the jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say David Matacotâ— of Saint Giles John Hayman of Shelbere John Hooper of Westdown Richard Clyeff of Chanford John Bow of the same and John Hole of Drew Steinton came and are sworn in the said Jury And because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore others of the standers by by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid chosen at the request of the said William Rud and by the Command of the justices
against him complaineth But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The aforesaid Entry of the said Edward into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. be a good and lawful Entry in Law or not the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant And thereof pray the Advise and Consideration of the Court c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Edward in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said William Rud be not a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Edward Tooker is guilty of the Trespass within written as the said W. Rud above against him complaineth And assess the damages of the said William Rud by that occasion above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in that behalf expended to 6. pence and for his costs and charges of 20. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Edward in the Tenements within wrtten with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William be a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Edward is not guilty of the Trespass within written as the said â—dward above against him allegeth And because the Court of the said Lady the Q. here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster aforesaid until Thursday next after the Morrow of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queeen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the said Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement o and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 18. days of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day further thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. AT which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear
their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westmin aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the said Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here therof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Wesminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at West aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westmin aforesaid until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Wesminster aforesaid until Wednesday next 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the partes aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until VVednesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which all and singular the premises being seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here fully understood and mature deliberation being had thereof Because it seemeth to the said Court of the said Lady the Queen and the Justices here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Edward into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said William thereof is a good and lawful Entry in Law Therefore it is granted That the
said VVilliam take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamour he be in Mercy c. And the aforesaid Edward go thereof without day c. TRESPAS Trinity Term Anno 70. of King JAMES Rot. 2612. in the COMMON-PLEAS C. 9. part The Earl of Shrewesburies Case fol. 42. RObert Spencer late of Maunsfield in the County aforesaid Esquire and Brownl Thomas Woodward late of Maunsfield in the Couty aforesaid Gentleman were attached to Answer to Roger Earl of Rutland of a Plea Wherefore Whereas The Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 14th day of July in the 42th yeer of her Reign at Westminster in the County of Middlesex By her Letters Patents sealed with the Great Seal of England had given and granted to the said Earl from the time of the full age of the said Earl of 21. years To the Term and for and during the Term of his natural life The Office of Steward of the Lordships or Manors of her the late Queen of Maunsfield in the County aforesaid and Bolsover and Horseley in the County of Derby with the Wages Fees to the said Office anciently due and accustomed To have and yeerly to receive the said Wages during the Term aforesaid of the Issues Profits Farms and Revenews of the aforesaid Lordships or Manors by the Hands of the Farmers Receivers or any other Occupiers thereof for the time being at the Feasts of St. Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions Together with all other Profits Rights Commodities Jurisdictions Privileges Preheminences and Emoluments to the said Offices arising or in any wayes belonging And whereas the said Earl before the making of the said Letters Patents that is to say the 19th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late Queen the 40th had attained unto his full age of 21 years and by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid was seized of the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield as of Freehold for the Term of his life And the same Offine from the aforesaid 14th day of June in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen the 42th aforesaid for one whole year then next after well and faithfully had executed and the Wages Fees and Profits to the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield of old due and accustomed by that time had had and received The aforesaid Robert and Thomas intending manifoldly to molest him the said Earl and him the said ' Earl to disturb from the Execution of the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield and him the said Earl of the Wages Fees and Profits which by reason of the execution of the said Office which he could and might of Right to have and receive wholy to frustrate and hinder of his own wrong without any Right of lawful authority without the leave of the said Earl the 16th day of February in the year of the Reign of the said late Queen the 44th at Maunsfield aforesaid The aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid exercised and from thence hitherto do exercise and occupie and all and singular the Wages Fees Commodities and Profits to the said Office due and by reason of the exercising of the Office aforesaid within the Manor aforesaid of right belonging to their own proper use had and received and the said Eearl to exercise the said Office within the aforesaid Manor aforesaid and the Wages Fees Commodities and Profits to the said Office of right to have and receive with force and Arms then and there hindered and yet do hinder and other harms to him did to the great damage of him the said Earl and against the peace of the said Lord the King that now is c. And whereupon the said Earl by John Muscott his Attorny complaineth for that whereas the aforesaid late Queen the 14th day of June in the year of the Reign the 42th abovesaid at VVestminster aforesaid by her aforesaid Letters Patents which the said Earl under the great Seal of England Sealed here in Court bringeth whose date is the same day and year had given and granted unto the said Earl from the time of the full age of the said Earl of 21 years to the term and for and during the whole term of the natural life of him the said Earl the aforesaid Offices of Steward of the aforesaid Lorsships or Manors of the aforesaid late Queen of Maunsfield Bolsover and Horsley with the Wages and Fees to the said Offices of old due and accustomed to have and receive yearly the said Wages during the term aforesaid of the Issues Profits Farms and Revenues of the said Lordships or Manors by the hand of the Farmers Receivers or other Occupiers of the same for the time being at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angel and Easter by equal portions tegether with all other Profits Rights Commodities Jurisdictions Privileges Appurtenances Emoluments to the said Offices belonging or any waies appertaining and whereas the said Earl before the making of the aforesaid Letters Patents that is to say the 19th day of November in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late Queen the 40th aforesaid had attained unto his full age of 21. years and by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid was seised of the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield as of his free-hold for the term of his life and that Office from the aforesaid 14th day of June in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late Queen the 42th abovesaid for one whole year then next following well and truly had exercised and the Wages Fees and Profits to the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield from of old due and accustomed for that time had had and received the aforesaid Robert and Thomas endevoring him the said Easl from the exercising of the said Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Mauasfield greatly to disturb the said Earl of the Wages Fees Profits that is to say of 100. s. yearly to be paid for the exercising of the afores office of Steward of the the ancient Fees due for the entring of playnts and pleas for Coppies of Court Rolls for Replevins for proving of Wills for granting of administrations of all persons whatsoever dying within the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield for the entring of surrendors and admission of all Tenants whatsoever of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield for the Entry of of the Fealty of all Tenants of the said Manor of Maunsfield which of right he ought or might have and receive utterly to frustrate and hinder of his own wrong without any right or Lawfull authority without the leave of him the said Earl the aforesaid 16. day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said late Queen the 42th abovesaid at Maunsfield aforesaid the aforesaid Office of Steward of the said Manor of
same day and year and afterwards that is to say the 27th day of the same Moneth of January in the year 44th aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery of Record inrolled for and in Consideration of 10. shillings to the said William and Ralph By the Right Honourable Gilbert Earl of Shrewesbury and Mary his Wife paid granted aliened bargained and sold the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Mary his Wife To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countesse and to their Heirs for ever By virtue of which as also by force of an Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th in the year of his Reign the 27th holden made the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countess were of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with their Appurtenances seised in their Demesn as of Fee And the Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countess so as before is said being seised Afterwards that is to say the 16th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said late Queen the 44th in the Declaration above specified One Simon Stern then being Deputie of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland for the exercising the said Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield came to the Town of Maunsfield to the usual place there where the Court of the Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid was commonly holden and kept to keep the Court Baron of the said Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid And the aforesaid Thomas Woodward came thither to keep the Court of the said Manor as Steward for the aforesaid Gilbert Earl of Shrewsbury and that the aforesaid Thomas Woodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury and the aforesaid Simon Stern as Deputy of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland to the place aforesaid both together came And the said Simon Stern as Deputy of the said Earl of Rutland Commanded the Bayliff of the same Manor to make Proclamation for the holding of the Court Baron of the said Manor by him the said Simon Stern as Deputy of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland then to be holden And the aforesaid Thomas VVoodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury likewise Commanded the Bayliff of that Manor that he make Proclamation for the holding of the Court Baron of the Manor aforesaid by him the said Thomas VVoodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury But no Court then was holden but by the said Thomas VVoodward it was then adjorned And from thence until the bringing of the aforesaid Original Writ The aforesaid Thomas VVoodward and Steward of the aforesaid Gilbert Earl of Shrewsbury kept the Courts of the Manor aforesaid and allwayes from thence he the said Thomas Woodward and the aforesaid Robert Spencer Received all the Fees belonging to the Steward there as they became due And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It sahll seem to the Court here that the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas VVoodward are guilty of the Trespass within written Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are guilty of the Trespasse within written as the said Roger Earl of Rutland within against them complaineth And then they assesse the Damages of the said Roger Earl of Rutland above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to Forty pound and for his costs and charges to Twelve pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here that the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are not guilty of the Trespasse within written Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are not guilty of the Trespass within written as the said Robert and Thomas within have alleged And because c. TRESPAS Michaelmass Term Anno 10. of King JAMES Rot. 574. in the KINGS-BENCH Co. 10. part The Case of Suttons Hospital Fol. 1. MEmorandum that at another time that is to say Trinity Term Middle past before the Lord the King at Westminster come Simon Baxter Gent. by George Cuppledick his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lord the King then and there his Bill against Richard Sutton Esq and John Law Gentleman in the custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Middlesex ss Simon Baxter Gentleman complaineth of Richard Sutton and John Law in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey being before the King himself For that That they The 30th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 10th with force and Arms the Close and House of him the said Simon that is to say A Capital Messuage with the Appurtenances called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-Field at the Parish of Saint Sepulchre in the County aforesaid they brake and entred and other harms to him did against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is to the damage of the said Simon 40. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute And now at this day That is to say Friday next after 8. days of Saint Michael this Term until which day the aforesaid Richard and John had license to imparl to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lord the King at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Simon by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Richard and John by Thomas Heyward their Attorny And the said Richard and John defend the force and injury when c. And say that they are not guilty and of this put themselves upon the Country and the said Simon Baxter likewise Therefore a Jury was to come thereof before the Lord the King at Westminster Saturday next after 8. days of Saint Hillary And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors were put by them in respite until Monday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the blessed Mary then next following for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Simon Baxter as the aforesaid John Sutton and John Law by their Attornies aforesaid And the said Jurors being called come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one Thomas Sutton Esquire long before the time in which the Trespass aforesaid is supposed to be done was seized of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Southminster Norton Little Hallingbury otherwise Hallingbury Bowchers and Muchstanbridge in the County of
Essex with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever As also of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Bustingthorp otherwise Buslingthorp and Dunnesby in the County of Lincoln with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And of and in all those Manors of Salthorp otherwise Saltrop otherwise Halthrop Chilton and Black-grove in the County of Wilts with their Rights Members and Appurtenances And of and in all those Lands and Pastures called Black-grove conteining by estimation 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Black-grove and Wroughton in the County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors of Mihenden otherwise Missenden otherwise called the Manors of Mussenden in the Parish of Wroughton Lydepard and Tregose in the said County of Wilts with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances and of all that Manor of Elcomb and Park called Elcomb Park with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Wattlescote otherwise Wigglescote otherwise Wiggetscete with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Mannor of Wescot otherwise Wescet with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Lands and Pastures conteining by estimation 100. Acres of Land and 60. Acres of Pasture in Wigglescot Wroughton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Vscot with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those two Messuages and 1000. Acres of Land 2000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Pasture and 300. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Broadhinton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Campes otherwise Campes-Castle otherwise called Castle Campes with the Appurtenances situate lying being and extending into the Counties of CAMBRIDGE and ESSEX or either of them or elsewhere in the Kingdom of ENGLAND And also of and in all that Manor of Balsham in the County of Cambridge with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And also of and in all and singular those Messuages and Lands situate and being in the Parish of Hackney and Tottingham in the County of Middlesex with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever which Messuage was lately purchased of Will. Bowper Knight the said Lands in Tottenham now are or late were in the Tenure or Occupation of William Benning Yeoman And of and in all and singular Manors Lordships Messuages Lands Tenements Reversions Services Feedings Pastures Woods Advowsons Patronages of Churches and Hereditaments of the aforesaid Thomas Sutton whatsoever situate lying and being in the said Counties of Essex Lincoln Wilts Cambridge and Middlesex or any of them with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever in his demesn as of Fee And the said Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Sutton so thereof being seised before the time in which that is to say At the 4th Session of Parliament begun and holden by Prorogation at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 9th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. the 7th and of Scotland the 3d. and there continued untill the 24th day of July then next following and then prorogued until the 16th day of October then next following amongst other things it was Enacted and established by Authority of the same Parliament as followeth in these words Humbly beseecheth your Majesty Your Loyal and dutiful Subject Thomas Sutton of Bedsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire That it may please your most excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled To Enact Ordain Establish And be it Enacted Ordained and Established by the Authority aforesaid That in the Town of Hallingburn otherwise called Hallinborn Bowchers in the County of Essex there may be builded and erected at the Costs and Charges of your suppliant one meet fit and convenient House Buildings and Rooms for the abiding and dwelling of such number of poor People Men and Children as your suppliant shall name by limit and appointment to be lodged harboured abide and be relieved there And for the abiding dwelling and necessary use of one School-master and Usher to instruct the said Children in Reading Writing and the Latine and Greek Grammar And of one Divine and godly Preacher to instruct and teach all the rest of the same House in the knowledge of God and his word And of one Master to govern all these persons of in or belonging unto the same House And that the same shall and may be called The Hospital of King James founded in Hallingbury in the County of Essex at the humble Petition and at the only Costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And that the Right Reverend Father in God Richard now Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and his Successors Arch-Bishops there Thomas Lord Ellesmore Lord Chancellor of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Lord Chancellors or Lord Keepers of the Great Seal of England for and during the time they shall so continue or be in the same Office Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England for and during the time they shall continue or be in the same Office The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Bishop of Ely and his Successors Bishops there Richard Bishop of Rochester and Dean of the Cathedral Church of Westminster and his Successors of and in the same Deanery Sir Thomas Foster Kt. one of the Justices of your Majesties Court of Common-Pleas usually holden at Westminster Sir Henry Hobart Knight your Majesties Attorney General John Overal Doctor of Divinity Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London and his Successors Deans there Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of your Majesties Court of Chancery Thomas Fortescue Thomas Paget Geffrey Nightingale and Richard Sutton Esquires John Law and Thomas Brown Gent. and such others as shall be from time to time for ever hereafter chosen and nominated in and to the places and steads of such of them as shall decease by your suppliant during his life and after his decease by the most part of them which them shall be Governors of the said Hospital to be and succeed in and to the place and places of him and them deceasing shall and may be the Governors of the said Hospital and of the Members Goods Lands Revenews and Hereditaments of the same at all times hereafter for ever And that the same Governors and Hospital shall for ever hereafter stand and be incorporated Established and founded in name and indeed a body Politick Corporate to have continuance for ever By the name of the Governors of the Hospital
or the Charter-House and all and singular the before mentioned premises and every part and parcel thereof with the Appurtenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and his Heirs and all and every other person and persons lawfully claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for ever more defend by these presents And the said William Lord Howard and his Heirs the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the Charter-House and all and singular other the before mentioned premises and every part and parcel thereof with the Appurtenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said William Lord Howard and his Heirs and all and every other person and persons lawfully claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for ever defend by these presents In witnesse whereof the parties above named to these present Indentures interchangealy have set their Hands and Seals the day and year above written 1611 as by the same Indenture dated as before is said appeareth All and singular whichpremises by the Indenture a-aforesaid in form aforesaid Bargained are known and vulgarly called and at the time of the Bargain aforesaid were known by the name of the late dissolved Charter House besides Smith field By colour of which Bargain Sale and Inrollment aforesaid As also by force of a certain Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster aforesaid the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th Of transferring uses in possession to be holden made and provided The same Thomas Sutton in all and singular the bargained premises called the late dissoved Charter-House besides Smith field with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The Lord JAMES now King of England the 22th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King now of England c. the 9th abovesaid at Westminster aforesaid made his Letters Patents sealed with his Great Seal of England and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence The Tenor of which followeth in these words JAMES by the Grace of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. To All to whom these presents shall come Greeting Whereas At the last Session of Parliament last past One Act was made and passed Entituled an Act to confirm and enable the Erection and Establishment of and Hospital a Free Grammar-school and sundry other godly and charitable Acts done and intended to be done and performed by Thomas Sutton Esquire as by the same Act of Parliament more at large it doth and may appear And whereas since the said Act The said Thomas Sutton hath purchased to him as his Heirs of our Right Trusty and Well-Beloved Cosin and Counsellor Thomas Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of our Houshold A great and large Mansion-house commonly called the late dissolved Charter-house besides Smith field together with divers Houses Buildings Courts Yards Gardens Orchards Closes and other Hereditaments to or with the same Mansion-house used or enjoyed or reputed as part parcel member or belonging thereunto within our County of Middlesex Which Mansion house and other the premises the said Thomas Sutton doth conceive to be a more fit and commodious House and Place to place erect and found the said Hospital and Free-school and other the godly and charitable uses aforesaid then in Hallingbury otherwise Hallibury Bowchers in the said Act mentioned And to that end the said Thomas Sutton hath been an humble Suter unto us That we would be graciously pleased to give License Power and Authority unto him the said Thomas Sutton to found erect and establish an Hospital and Free school other the godly and charitable uses by him intended in the said House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith field in our said County of Middlesex And to incorporate the Governours hereafter named to be a Body Corporate and Politick and to have perpetual succession for ever in fact deed or name And by such name of Incorporation as is hereafter mentioned to have full authority and lawful capacity and ability to purchase take hold receive and have to them and their Successors for ever Manors Lands Tenements Rents Annuities Pensions Hereditaments Goods and Chattels as well of us our Heirs and Successors as of any other person or persons whatsoever for the better maintainance of the said Hospital Free-school and other godly and charitable uses aforesaid Know ye therefore That we graciously affecting so good and charitable a work of our princely disposition and care for the furtherance thereof and of our special Grace certain Knowledge and meer Motion Have given granted and confirmed and by these presents do give grant and confirm for us our Heirs and Successors unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs Executors Administrators and Assigns and to every of them full Power License and lawful Authority at all times hereafter at his and their Will and Pleasure to place erect found and establish at or in the said House called the late dissolved Charter House besides Smith field and other the premises within our said County of Middlesex One Hospital-House or place of abiding for the finding sustentation and relief of poor aged maimed needy and impotent people As also that the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors or Survivor of them his and their Successors for ever And the Governours hereof for the time being and their Successors shall have full Power License and lawful Authority at his oâ— their Wills and Pleasures respectively from time to time and at all times hereafter to place therein such Master or Head of the said Hospital and numbers of poor peole Men and Children and such other Members and Officers of the said Hospital as to him the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death to the said Governours and their Successors and to the Survivors or Survivor of them and to his and their Successors and to the Governours thereof for the time being and their Successors shall seem convenient And further we of our special Grace certain Knowledge and meer Motion Have given granted and confirmed and by these presents do give grant and confirm unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs Executors Administrators and Assigns and to every of them at his or their Wills and Pleasures full Power License and lawful Authority at all times hereafter to place erect found and establish at or in the said House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith field and other the premises in our County of Middlesex One Free-school for the instructing teaching maintainance and education of poor Children or Scholars
said County of Wilts with all his Rights Members and Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And also all those Manors of Wescote otherwise Wescote with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And also all those his Lands and Pastures containing by estimation 100. Acres of Land and 60. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Wiglescate and Wroughton in the said County of Wilts And all that his Manor of Vsscote with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And also all those his two Messuages 1000. Acres of Land 2000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Meadow 300. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Broadhinton in the said County of Wilts And all those his Manors Lordships of Campes otherwise Camps Castle otherwise called Castle Camps with the Appurtenances situate lying and being and extending into the Counties of Cambridge and Essex or in either of them or elsewhere within the Realm of England And also all that his Manor of Balsham in the County of Cambridge and all singular the Rights Members Appurtenances thereof whatsoever And also all those his Messuages and Lands situate lying and being in the Parishes of Hackney and Tottenham in the County of Middlesex or in either of them with their and either of their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever which said Messuage was lately purchased of Sir William Bowyer Knight and the Lands in Tottenham now are or late were in the Tenure or Occupation of VVilliam Benning Yeoman And also all singular the Manors Lordships Messuages Lands Tenements Reversions and Services Meadows Pastures Woods Advowsons Patronages of Churches and Hereditaments of the said Thomas Sutton wheresoever situate lying and being within the said County of Essex Lincoln Wilts Cambridge and Middlesex or any of them with all and every their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever or and such and so many and such part of the said Manors Advowsons Tenements and Hereditaments or of any part thereof as the said Thomas Sutton shall think meet And also all Letters Patents Indentures Deeds Evidences Bonds and Writings concerning the premises or any of them which shall be so given and granted by the said Thomas Sutton to the said Governours and their Successors and all such Conditions Warrants Vouchers Actions Sutes Entries Benefits and demands as shall be or may be had by any person or persons or by reason of them or any of them except all his Manor and Lordship of Littelbury and Haddestock with the Appurtenances in the said County of Essex aforesaid or in either of them though the premises or any of them be holden of us immediately in Chief or by Knights service or otherwise howsoever and without any license or pardon for Alienation of them or any of them the Statute of Mortmain or any other Act Statute Ordinance or Provision whatsoever to the contrary notwithstanding And our further Will and Pleasure is And we do by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors ordain and strictly charge and command That whatsoever and as often as any of the Churches Parsonages Viccarages Chapels or other spiritual livings the Advowsons Patronages and Donations whereof are hereby meant or mentioned to be licensed to be given by the said Thomas Sutton to the said Governours and their Successors for and towards the maintainance of the said godly and charitable use shall happen to become void or presentative or presentable or to be given or collated unto by the Death Resignation or Deprivation of any Incumbent or Incumbents of them or any of them or by any other means howsoever That then and so often the said Governours for the time being or their Successors or the greater part of them or the time being shall present prefer and collate thereunto such meet and sufficient persons as they shall think fit Nevertheless our full meaning and direction is in this and so we do by these presents for us our Heirs and successors ordayn and declare that such and so many of the Scholars which shall from time be brought up and taught in the said Hospital and every of them as shall after be fully qualified and become meet to take upon them or any them the charge of the said Churches Parsonages Viccarages Chapels or other spiritual livings aforesaid shall as near as may be from time time be by the said Governours and their Successors presented preferred and collated thereunto before any other person or persons whatsoever avoiding as much as may be the giving of more Benefices than one to any one Incumbent And to the end that all supition of indirect dealing which might hereafter be used or put in practise by the aforesaid Governours or their Successors or any of them contrary to the true intent and meaning of these presents may be prevented and taken away Our Will and Pleasure is And we do by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors ordain and streightly command and charge That the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and other the premises which at any time hereafter shall be given granted or conveied for the maintainance of the said godly and charitable uses before in these presents mentioned in or any part or parcel of them or of any of them shall at any time hereafter be leased demised granted or conveied to them the said Governours or their Successors or to any of them or to any other person or persons whatsoever for or to the use benefit and behoof of the said Governours or of their Successors or any of them although expresse mention of the clear yeerly value and certainty of the premises or of any them or of any other gifts or grants by us or any of our Progenitors or Predecessors to the said Thomas Sutton heretofore made is not made or any Statute Act Ordinance Provision Proclamation or Restraint to the contrary notwithstanding In Witnesse whereof we have caused these our Letters to be made Patents Witnesse our self at Westminster the 22th day of June in the 9th yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland and of Scotland the 44th as by the said Letters Patents more fully appeareth And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Smith of all and singular the premises aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized The said Thomas Sutton afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. That is to say the 30th day of October iin the yeer of the Reign of the Lord JAMES that now is of England the 9th abovesaid made a certain Writing sealed with his Seal bearing date the same day and yeer and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence to one John Hutton Clerk The Tenor of which Writing followeth in these words To All to whom this present shall come Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire sendeth Greeting Whereas it pleased the Kings most Excellent Majesty that now is by his Highnesse Letters Patents bearing date at Westminster
and 1000. Acres of Land 2000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Meadow 300. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Broadhinton in the said County of Wilts And all those his Manors Lordships of Campes otherwise Camps Castle otherwise called Castle Camps with the Appurtenances situate lying and being and extending into the Counties of Cambridge and Essex or either of them or elsewhere within the Realm of England And also all that his Manor of Balsham in the County of Cambridge with all and singular the Rights Members Appurtenances thereof whatsoever And all those his Messuages and Lands situate lying and being in the Parishes of Hackney and Tottenham in the County of Middlesex or in either of them with their and either of their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever which said last mentioned Messuage was lately purchased of Sir William Bowyer Knight and the Lands in Tottenham now are or late were in the Tenure or Occupation of VVilliam Benning Yeoman And also all and singular the Manors Lordships Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services Meadows Pastures Woods Advowsons Patronages of Churches Liberties Priviledges Franchises and other Hereditament whatsoever of the said Thomas Sutton situate lying and being or to be had taken and enjoyed within the said County of Essex Lincoln Wilts Cambridge and Middlesex or in any of them with all and every their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And all Letters Patents Indentures Deeds Charters Extents Court Rouls and other Writings Minuments and Evidences whatsoever concerning the premises or any of them or any part or parcel of them or any of them Except and allwaies foreprized out of these presents the Manors or Lordships of Little Hallingbury and Haddestock or either of them or to the said Manors of Little Hallingbury and Haddestock or either of them belonging or appertaining To have and to hold the said Mansion-House called the Charter-House besides Smithfield And all and every the said Manors Lordships Messuages Parks Lands Tenements Reversions Services Advowsons Liberties Franchises Priviledges and Herediataments and all other the premises with their and every their Members and Appurtenances except before excepted unto the said Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and goods of the said Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire and their Successors for ever upon special trust and confidence That all singular the Rents Issues Revenews Cōmodities and profits of all singular the said Manors Houses Lands Tenements Hereditaments and other the premises with their Appurtenances shall be for ever hereafter from time to time truly faithfully and wholy distributed converted and imployed by the said Governours and their Successors to and for the maintainance continuance of the said Hospital and Free-School and of the Master Preacher School-Master Usher poor people Scholars Officers of and in the said Hospital and Free-school for the time being and at all times hereafter and from time to time for ever according to the true intent purport and meaning of the said Thomas Sutton and according to the Tenor and purport of the said Letters Patents and of these presents and to none other trust use confidence interest purpose or imployment whatsoever Yielding and paying therefore yeerly unto the said Thomas Sutton and his Heirs the yeerly Rent of 12. pence at the Feast of the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist yeerly to be paid And when and as of often as the said yeerly Rent of 12. pence shall be behind and unpaid at any Feast whereon the same ought to be paid That then and so often It shall be lawful for the said Thomas Sutton and his Heirs into the pemises and into every or any part or parcel thereof to enter and distrem and the distresse and distresses there taken to take lead and carry away and with him and them to detein until he and they be satisfied of the said Rent and the Arrerages thereof if any may be In witnesse whereof the parties first above named to these present Indentures interchangeably have set their Hands Seals the day and yeer first above written And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of the aforesaid premises with the Appurtenances in the County of Middlesex as before is said being seised The said Thomas Sutton after the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain Sale of the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. by the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk to the aforesaid Thomas Sutton made and after the Inrollment of the aforesaid Indenture and before the Letters Patents aforesaid by the said Lord the King that now is as is said made and before the aforesaid Indenture made Between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of the one part And the aforesaid George Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Primiate and Metropolitan of all England and others of the other part bearing date the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid Appointed one Richard Bird to be Porter of the said Messuage called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field of the aforesaid Thomas Sutton which Richard Bird continued Porter of the said Messuage after the said Indenture made Between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of the one part the aforesaid George Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and others of the other part bearing date the aforesaid first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid until the death of the said Tho. Sutton And further the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Sutton afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the second day of November in the yeer of our Lord 1611. made his Testament and last Will in Writing amongst other things as followeth in these words And my Will and meaning is That unlesse the said Sir Francis Popham the said Lady Ann his Wife do or shall give to mine Executor or Executors A general Acquittance or Release to the elect above mentioned That then as well the said Legacy of 2000. Marks so willed to be given to the said Sir Francis Popham and Ann his Wife as also the other several Legacies given and bequeathed to every of the said Children of Sir Francis Prpham and the Lady his Wife shall remain and be to the use of mine Executor or Executors to be wholly disposed and given by them within one whole yeer after my decease yeerly to the mending of the High-wayes and partly to poor Maids Mariages and partly to the Releasing of poor men that lie in Prison for Debt and partly to the poor people of my intended Hospital when it shall please God it be established and erected Also I give for and towards the building of my intended Hospital Chapel and School-house the sum of 5000. pound Item I
said Lady the Queen of the Bench here at Westminster in Easter Term in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen the 30th abovesaid before the then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here as the deed of the said William Haw by him the said William acknowledged and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the same Easter Term in due manner in the said Court of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided for and in consideration of 120. pound to the said William by the said Richard before that time paid bargained and sold to the said Richard amongst other things the Reversion aforesaid To have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever By Colour of which Bargain and Sale and Inrollment aforesaid and by force of a certain Statute made in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th holden at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer his Reign the 27th Of transferring of uses into possession the aforesaid Richard was and yet is seised of the Reversion aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And the said Richard so thereof being seised and the aforesaid Elizabeth of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to her in form aforesaid granted being possessed The said Elizabeth did waste spoyle and destruction of the Lands that is to say in digging in 10. Acres of Land in Goring aforesaid parcel of the Tenements aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert demised 100. loads of Clay taking for the price of every load of Clay thereof 8. pence and cutting down and selling of the Woods also in a certain Wood called Heighgrove containing 10. Acres of Wood with the Appurte in Goring aforesaid and parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said Robert above in form aforesaid demised 20. Oaks the price of every Oak 5. shillings through the said whole Wood here and there growing and in a certain other Wood called the Hedge Row lying in Goring aforesaid near the aforesaid Wood called Heighgrove in Goring aforesaid parcel of the Tenement aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert demised 40. Oaks the price of each of them 6. shillings through the said whole Wood here and theregrowing and in a certain Coppice called Home Coppice in Goring aforesaid parcel of the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances to the said Robert in form aforesaid above demised 100. Oaks price of each of them 10. shillings in the said Coppice called Home Coppice late growing here and there And in 20. Acres of Pasture called the Hanging in Goring aforesaid lying there bebetwixt a certain Close called High grove hill and another Close called Dicker grove hill that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised 10. Oaks price of each of them 6. shillings Six Ashes price of each of them 5. shillings and 10. Beeches price of each of them 6. shillings in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture likewise late here and there growing and in a certain Hedge of a certain Close called Home field in Whitchurch aforesaid that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised lying near unto a Wood called Hawes Coppice 3. Oaks price of each of them 10. shillings and one Beech price 10. shillings and in a certain other Hedge of the Close aforesaid called Home field in VVhitchurch aforesaid that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised lying near to the aforesaid Wood called Home Coppice 10. Oaks price of each of them 20. shillings and also in suffering the sprouts of the Roots of 20000. other little Oaks called Oakesciapling of 20000. Beeches and 200. Ashes to the value of 20. pound in the said Wood called Heigh grove and 10000. of other little Oaks called Oakesapling 10000. of Beeches and 100. of Ashes to the value of 20. pound in the aforesaid Wood called the Hedge Row and 10000. of Oaks 10000. of Beeches and 200. of Ashes in the aforesaid Coppice called Hawe Coppice by the said Elizabeth through the whole Woods here and there growing to be cut and to be eaten and utterly destroyed and wasted with Cattel to the dissenherisin of the said Richard and against the form of the Provision aforesaid Whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 200. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the the aforesaid Elizabeth by Ralph Burges her Attorny cometh and desendeth the force and injury when c. And whatsoever c. And saith that the aforesaid Richard his Action against her ought not to have Because she saith That well and true it is That the aforesaid William Haw was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and being thereof so seised the aforesaid 4th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th abovesaid By his Indenture demised to the aforesaid Robert the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances except before excepted To have and to hold to him and his Assigns from the aforesaid Feast of the birth of our Lord then last past until the end and Term of the aforesaid 16. yeers then next following and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which demise the aforesaid Robert into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid 20th day of August abovesaid granted all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he had then to come of and in the aforesaid premises with the Appurtenances above demised to the aforesaid Elizabeth Hynde By virtue of which grant the aforesaid Elizabeth into the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances above demised entred and waâ— thereof possessed as the aforesaid Rich. by his Declaration above supposeeth But the said Elizabeth further saith That the said Elizabeth of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above demised in form aforesaid being possessed and the said William Haw of the Reversion thereof being seised in his Demesn as of Fee after the aforesaid 7th day of May in the 30th yeer aforesaid and before the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale Between the aforesaid William of the one part and the aforesaid Richard of the other part made in the Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench in form aforesaid was inrolled A Fine was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here that is to say at WESTMINSTER aforesaid from the aforesaid day of Easter in 15. days in the yeer of her Reign the 30th abovesaid before Edmond Anderson Francis Windham William Periam and Francis Rodes then Justices of the said
here untill from the day of St. Michael in one Moneth then next following At which day here cometh as well the said Owen as the said John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this further prayeth liecnce thereof to imparl here c. Until from Easter day in 15. dayes and hath it c. And the same day is given to the said Owen here c. At which day of 14. dayes of Easter came as well the aforesaid Owen as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The said Owen prayeth that the aforesaid John to his Writ and Declaration aforesaid answer And the said John Drury saith That he for any thing before alleged from having execution of his Debt and Damages against him the said Owen ought not to be barred or delayed Because he saith That after the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid Owen out of the custody of the aforesaid Sheriff of Surry to have escaped and before any further execution against the aforesaid Owen by him the said John by Colour of the Judgement aforesaid was sued forth and had that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid out of the aforesaid Court of the said Lord the King that now is of the Bench here upon the Outlawry as is before said pronounced Issued forth a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum against him the said Owen At the Sute of the said John then to the Sheriff of the County of Midd. directed By which Writ The Lord the King commanded the aforesaid Sheriff of Midd. That he should not omit for any Liberty of his County but that he take the aforesaid Owen by the name of Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. Outlawed in the aforesaid County of Sussex the aforesaid 19th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid at the Sute of him the said John by the name of John Drury Doctor of Law Of a Plea of Debt whereof he was convicted if he should be found in his Baliwick and him should safe keep c. So as he have his Body here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in the aforesaid morrow of All Souls the self same Term of St. Michael in the yeer aforesaid to do and to receive what to the Court of the said Lord the King thereof should consider in that behalf At which morrow of All Souls here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Owen by William Brown then his Attorny And the Sheriffs that is to say George Bolles and Richard Farrington then Sheriffs of the aforesaid County of Midd. then here sent That the aforesaid Owen was not found c. And upon this the said Owen then prayed the hearing of the Writ of Exigent upon which the said Owen at the Sute of the said John Drury aforesaid in form aforesaid stood Outlawed And it was then read to him in these words JAMES by the grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sherifs of Sussex greeting We command you that you put in Exigent Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. from County in County until according to the Law Custom of our Kingdom of England he be Outlawed if he shall not appear And if he shall appear then that you him take cause safely to be kept so as you have his body before our Justices at West in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to satisfie to Iohn Drury Doctor of Law as well of a certain debt of 200. pounds which the said Iohn in the said our Court before our Justices at Westminster Recovered against him as of 33. shillings and 4. pence which to the said Iohn in the same our Court were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining the same Debt whereof he is Convicted And sent to our Justices at Westminster in 8. dayes of St. Hillary That the aforesaid Owen is not found in your Baliwick And have here this Writ witnesse Edward Coke at Westminster the 25th day of Ianuary in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 5th and of Scotland the 41. Which being read and heard The said Owen said That he of the Outlawry aforesaid ought not to have him charged because the said Writ of Exigent had not any certain day of Retorn these words Saint between the word morrow and Trinity not having any signification as by the Writ aforesaid then it appeared And for the same Cause the said Owen then prayed Judgement and that the Outlawrie aforesaid in form aforesaid pronounced and had be annulled made void and altogether holden for nought Upon which the Writ aforesaid then being seen And by the Justices here then fully understood To the same Justices it then appeared That the Allegation of the aforesaid William Brown in discharge of the aforesaid Owen of the Outlawry aforesaid was true Therefore then it was considered in the said Court here that the said Owen by occasion of the Outlawry aforesaid should not be be molested or troubled but should go thereof acquitted c. as by the Record thereof in the said Court here remaining fully appeareth And so the said John Drury saith That there is not any such Record of the Outlawry aforesaid as the said Owen by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposeth And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth Judgement if he from execution of his Debt aforesaid and damages aforesaid against the aforesaid Owen ought to be barred c. and the aforesaid Owin saith that the aforesaid plea of the aforesaid John in form aforesaid above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the said John his execution by Colour of the Iudgment aforesaid to have and maintain and that he to that plea in manner and form aforesaid above pleaded needs not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to answer and this he is ready to aver wherefore for default of sufficient plea of the aforesaid John in this behalf the said Owen as at first prayeth Iudgement and that the said John from his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid be barred and that the said Owen be thereof charged c. and the aforesaid John in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said John his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid against the said Owen to have and maintain above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the said Owen doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but the said averrant altogether refuseth as before prayeth ludgement and execution of his Debt and damages aforesaid against the said Owyn to him to be adjuged c. and because the Iustices here will avise
year of our Lord 1595 above said in the University aforesaid at Cambridge aforesaid in the County of Cambridge was duly and lawfully ordained and made a Graduate of â—â—e University aforesaid that is to say Doctor in Physick according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid and that he the said Thomas Bonham then and there had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid by his form without grace from time to time according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and Ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid By colour whereof the same Thomas Bonham a Graduate of the University of Cambridge aforesaid that is to say being Doctor in Physick in the form aforesaid who had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid for his form without any grace The said faculty of Physick from time to time in the said City of London that is to say in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid did exercise as it was lawful for him to do until the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together with c. the aforesaid 10th day of November in the 4th yeer abovesaid with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham at London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and him there in Prison long that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England did detain as the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above against them complaineth and this he is ready to averr Whereupon in as much as the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid above have acknowledged The said Thomas Bonham demandeth Judgement and his damages by reason of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden say That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the Action of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham against them the said Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden to maintain and that they to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid by Replication pleaded need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to answer and this they are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement and that the said Thomas Bonham from having his Action aforesaid against them to be barred And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham for as much as he sufficient matter in Law to maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Henry Atkins George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden do not deny nor to the same any wayes answer but the same averment altogether to admit do refuse as at first he demands Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged to him c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises aforesaid whereof the parties have put themselves to the Judgement of the Court aforesaid before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here are not yet c. Formedon Michaelmass Term Anno 37. 38. Eliz. Rot. 82. in the COMMON PLEAS Lincoln College Case C. 3. part fol. 53. a. Robert Chamberlain Esq by Apollo Plain his Attorny demandeth against the Warden or Rector and Scholars of the Blessed Lady Mary and All Saints of Lincoln in the University of Oxford the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances Except 120. Acres of Pasture in Pettesho aforesaid and 30. Acres of Pasture in Eckney aforesaid which Alured Cornburgh Esq Richard Danvers Esq Nicholas Statham and William Callow gave to Richard Chamberlain Esq and Sibil Fowler and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten And which after the death of the aforesaid Richard and Sibil and of Edward Son and Heir of the said Edward Chamberlain and of Leonard Son and Heir of the said Edward and of Francis Son and Heir of the said Leonard to the aforesaid Robert Son and Heir of the aforesaid Francis ought to descend by the form of the gift aforesaid c. Whereupon he saith That the aforesaid Alured Connâ—burgh Richard Danâ—â—rs Nicholas and William gave the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil and to the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten in form aforesaid c. By which gift the said Richard and Sibil were seised of the said Mannors with the appurtenances that is to say the said Richard in his Demesn as of Fee and Right and the said Sibil in her Demesn as of Free hold by the form c. in the time of peace in the time of the Lord Ed. late King of England the 4th after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the yeerly value c. And from him the said Richard the Right descended by the form to one Edward as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Edward the Right descended by the form c. to one Leonard as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to one Francis as Son and Heir c. And from the said Fran. Son of the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to this Robert who now demandeth as Son and Heir c. And which after the death c. And thereof bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by William Pain their Attorny come and defend their Right when c. And say That the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have By protestation taking it That the aforesaid Alured Cornburgh Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow did not give the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil Fowler in manner and form as in the Declaration aforesaid is alleged For Plea say That long after the time in which the gift aforesaid is supposed to be made Richard Lyster Gent. Martin Linsey John Cotesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor Clerks were seised of the Mannors aforesaid with th appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seised The aforesaid Sibil Great-Grandmother of the said Robert Chamberlain whose Heir the same Robert is The 5th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England
with the Pannel of the names of the Jurors which are in the file of Writs executed for the Queen of the 34th Yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is with the Remembrancer of London And the Jurors did not appear Therefore it was coÌ„manded the Sherifs that they distrein the Jurors by their Lands c. So that c. in 8. Dayes of Holy Trinity or in the mean time before the Beloved and Faithful to the Lady the Queen Roger Manwood Knight Chief Baron of this Exchequer at Guiâ—d-hall of the City of London aforesaid upon Fryday the 26th day of May in the Yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 34th in the Afternoon of the same Day if he shall first come thither And it is said to the aforesaid Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain that they keep their Day before the aforesaid Chief Baron at the said Day and Place and that they be here at the said 8. dayes of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement If c. At which day the said John Porter and Henry Cockin come here as before And the aforesaid Chief Baron before whom delivered here the Tenor of the Record aforesaid in form aforesaid directed which is amongst the Inquisitions and Extents of this Yeer of the 34th of the Reign of the Queen that now is with this Remembrancer indorsed thus ss Afterwards that is to say the Day and Place within contained before Roger Manwood Knight Chief Baron of the Exchequer of the said Lady the Queen came aswell the within named John â—opham who prosecutes for the said Lady the Queen as the said within written John Porter and Henry Cockain in their proper persons and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them appeared and some of them not as it appeareth in the Pannel c. And some of them now appearing that is to say Roger Tasker Humphry Street George Gunbey Thomas Cox Thomas Langhorn John Eaton William Fruit and John Math upon the Jury aforesaid are sworn and because the rest of the Jurors of the Jury did not appear therefore others of the standers by by the Sherifs of the County aforesaid to be chosen at the Request of the said John Popham and by the command of the aforesaid Chief Baron were new put whose names to the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such case late made and provided And the Jurors so anew put that is to say Thomas Wiggs Henry Ayleward Ralph Baily and Cutbert Booth being called likewise came Who to the truth of the matter within contained together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the aforesaid time of Intrusion aforesaid above supposed to be done One Nicholas Gibson was seized of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Information aforesaid specified in his Demesn as of Fee and the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid held of the Lady the Queen in Socage that is to say of the free Borough of the City of London by fealty onely And so being thereof seized the said Nicholas afterwards and before the time of the Intrusion aforesaid c. that is to say the 23d day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 32th at London in the Parish of St. Dunstans in the East made his Testament and last Will in Writing and constituted one Avice then his Wife Executrix of his said Will and by the said his Will bequeathed and devised amongst other things the Whars and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Avice and her Heirs in these English Words and in form following That is to say In the name of God Amen I Nicholas Gibson Citizen and Grocer of London whole of Mind and of perfect Memory albeit sick of Body make this my present and last Will and Testament aswel concerning the Order and Disposion of my Goods Chattels and other things moveable as of my Lands and Tenemetns Rents Reversions and Services and Hereditaments whatsoever First I give and bequeath my Soul unto Almighty God my Maker Redeemer and Saviour and my Body to be buried where it shall please God after the said discretion of my well beloved Wife Avice Gibson my sole Executrix under written whom I put in special trust that she shall see these things hereafter declared to be well and truly executed don and declared and performed as hereafter shall be recited Unto whom also I give and bequeath All my Goods Chattels Debts and other things as well moveable as unmoveable real and personal Lands and Tenements Rents Reversions Services and all my other Profits and Commodities and other Hereditaments whatsoever with all and singular the appurtenances To have and to hold possesse and injoy All and singular my said Lands and Tenements Rents Reversions and Services with the appurtenances Goods Chattels and other things and all and singular other the premises with the appurtenances unto the said Avice Gibson her Heirs Executors Administrators and Assignes for ever upon condition following That is to say Where it hath pleased God to put me the said Nicholas Gibson in Mind to edifie diverse Meases Mansions and places convenient for a Free-school the Master of the same and certain Beadmen and Beadwomen and that the same cannot be established to continue without great charges to be imployed and bestowed upon the same and also Lands and Tenements and other Hereditaments to be assured for the continuance of the same I Will and Declare by this my last Will and Testament That the said Gift Legacy and bequest of my Lands and Tenements Goods Chattels and other things aforesaid shall inure and take effect by reason hereof unto my said Wife upon condition following That is to say That my said Wife by the Advice of Learned Counsel in all convenient speed after my decease shall assure give and grant all my said Lands and Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever for the maintainanee of the said Free-school Almesmen and Almeswomen for ever if it shall please God that my said Wife Avice Gibson shall have all the Issues Revenewes and Profits yeerly comming arising and growing of the premises during her life bearing the charges for the keeping of the said School Beadmen and Beadwomen and other charges for the maintainance of the premises in manner and form as I the said Nicholas have kept and maintained the same and as the same is now kept and maintained without any diminution in any wise Which Avice Gibson I make my sole Executrix of this my present Testament and last Will. These being Witnesses Thomas Rushton Sergeant at the Law William Gunston Esquire Thomas Wood Cooper Thomas Reinolds Clothworker and Iohn Mucklow Scrivener In witnesse whereof I have hereto put my Seal Given the 23th Day of September in the yeer of our Lord God 1540.
is aforesaid and that it shall and may be Lawfull to and for the said Master Preacher School-master Usher Poor men and Poor Children and Officers of the Hospital to remain assemble be and Cohabit together in the said House Buildings and Hospital And that it may be further enacted by the authority aforesaid and Be it enacted by the authority aforesaid that your said supplyant during his life and that the said Governors and their successors for the time being or the most part of them after his decease shall and may have full power and authority under the said common Seal to make ordayn set down and prescribe such Rules Statues and Ordinances for the Order Rule and Government of the said Hospital and of the said Master Preacher School-Master Usher Poor men Poor Children and Officers and their successors and for their and every of their stipends and allowances as to your said supplyant during his life and the said Governors and their successors for the time being or the most part of them after his decease shall seem meet and convenient And that the same Orders Rules Statutes and Ordinances so by him them or any of them made set down or prescribed as aforesaid shall be and stand in full force and strength in Law the same not being repugnant nor contrary to your Majesties Prerogative royal nor to the Laws or Statures of this your Majesties Realm of England nor to any Ecclesiastical Canons of the Church of England then in force and use And that your said supplyant during his life and the said Governours and their successors for the time being or the most part of them and such of them as your said supplyant shall thereto nominate and appoint shall and may after the decease of your said suppliant have power and authority to visit the said Hospital and to Order reform and redress all disorders and abuses in and touching the Government and disposing of the same And further to censure suspend and deprive the said Master Preacher School-master Usher Poor men Poor Children and Officers for the time being and every or any of them as to him and them shall seem Just fit and convenient so alwaies as no Visitation Act or thing in or touching the same be had made or done other than by your supplyant during his life or the said Governours and their successors for the time being or the most part of them after his decease or by such of them as your supplyant shall hereunto nominate and appoint And also that it may be farther enacted by the authority aforesaid and be it enacted by the authority aforesaid that that the said Preacher and Minister of the Word of God which shall be placed in the said Hospital to and for the uses and purposes aforesaid from time to time hereafter shall and may enter into have hold and enjoy the Rectory and Parsonage of Hallingbury aforesaid in and to his own proper use behoof for during so long time as he shall be Preacher Minister there without any other Presentation or Admission Jnstruction or Induction And that no Lease shall hereafter be made of the said Parsonage or of any part or portion thereof other than such as shall determine end when as soon as any such person shall be the Preacher or Minister of and in the said Hospital when the same Lease shall be made shall cease and resign leave or be put out and removed from his said place of Preacher or Minister of the said Hospital Saving alwayes and reserving to your Majesty your Heirs and Successors and to every other person or persons Bodies Politick or Corporate their Heirs and Successors other than your suppliant and his Heirs and the person and persons from whom the same were purchased and their Heirs claiming only as Heirs all such Estate Right Title Condition Claim Possession Rents Services Commons Demands Actions Remedies Recoveries Terms Interests Forfeits Comodities Advantages and Hereditaments whatsoever which they or any of them shall and may have or of Right ought to have of in to or out of the premises or any of them or any part thereof as if this Act had never been had or made Other than Fine or Fines of or for any Alienation of the premises or any part or parcel thereof And other their Respits of Homage or Fines for not payment of Respits of Homage at any time hereafter to be demanded And other than Title and Right of Liberty or Liberties to enter into the same or any one of them for or by reason of any Statute hitherto made for concerning or against any Alienation in Mortmain as by the said Act amongst other things it appeareth And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That Thomas then and now Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold before the aforesaid time in which c. was seized of and in a certain Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called or known by the name of Howard House otherwise called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smithfield situate lying and being in the County of Middlesex with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances to the same belonging and appertaining And all that Orchard and Garden with the Appurtenances thereunto likewise belonging and appertaining and of and in all that parcel of Land with the Appurtenances commonly called Pardon Church-yard and of all those two Messuages or Tenements and two Closes of Land with the Appurtenances thereunto belonging commonly called Welbech situate lying and being in the said County of Middlesex whereof the aforesaid Capital Messuage with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned is and the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid above to be done as also time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary was parcel in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said now Earl of Suffolk before the time in which c. That is to say at Westminster in the County of Middlesex By his certain Indenture between him the said now Earl by the name of the Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of the most Honourable Houshold of the Lord the King and Theophilus Lord Howard Son and Heir apparant of the said Earl of Suffolk and Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and William Lord Howard of Naward in the County of Cumberland of the one part and the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire on the other part made and within 6. Moneths then next following in the Court of the said Lord the King of Common-Pleas at VVestminster aforesaid then being in due manner of Record Inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided one part of which as well with the Seal of the aforesaid Thomas now Earl of Suffolk as with the Seals of the aforesaid Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey William Lord Howard sealed to the
Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed bearing date the same day and year For and in consideration of 13000. pound of good and lawful Mony of England by the said Thomas Sutton to the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk in Hand payed Bargained and Sold All and singular the premises with the Appurtenances being called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smithfield in the said County of Middlesex whereof c. to the said Thomas Sutton To have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever to the only use and behoof of the said Thomas his Heirs and Assigns for ever The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the 9th day of May in the 9th year of the Reign of our Soveraign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 44th Between the Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Majesties most Honourable Houshold The Right Honourable Theophilus Lord Howard Son and Heir apparant of the said Earl of Suffolk The Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and the Right Honourable William Lord Howard of Naward in the County of Cumberland of the one part and Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire on the other part Witnesseth That the said Right Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and William Lord Howard for and in consideration of the sum of 13000. p. of good and lawful Mony of England to the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk in Hand paid before the ensealing and delivery of these presents by the said Thomas Sutton well and truly satisfied contented and paid whereof and wherewith they and every of them acknowledge themselves fully satisfied contented and paid and thereof and every part and parcel thereof do clearly acquit exonerate and discharge the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs Executors and Administators and every of them by these presents Have granted Aliened Bargained Sold Conveied and Confirmed And by these presents do for them and their Heirs fully clearly and absolutely grant alien bargain fell convey and confirm unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever All that Capital Messuage or Mansion-house commonly called or known by the name of Howard House otherwise called The late dissolved Charter-Houso besides Smithfied situate and being within the County of Middles with all and singular the Rights Members and Appurtenances thereunto belonging and appertaining And all that Orchard and Garden with the Appurtenances thereunto likewise belonging and appertaining and all that parcel of Land and Ground with the Appurtenances commonly called Pardon Church yard And all those two Messuages or Tenement and two Closes of Land and Ground with the Appurtenances thereunto adjoyning commonly called Welbech situate lying and being in the said County of Middlesex And also all and singular Messuages Houses Edifices Buildings Barns Stables Dove-houses Courts Folds Curtilags Yards Orchards Gardens Shops Sellars Sollers Closes Inclosures Waste Grounds Tithes Oblations Obventions Fruits Profits Alterages Wayes Waters Rents Reversions Services Waises Strayes Goods of Felons Outlaws and Fugitives and all other Franchises Liberties Priviledges Jurisdictions Profits Emoluments Commodities Hereditaments and Appurtenances whatsoever by what name or names soever they be called or known to the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field and other the before mentioned premises and in every or any of them lying belonging or in any wise appertaining or to or with the same every or any of them usually held occupied or enjoyed or accepted or reputed taken known demised used or letten as part parcel or Member of them or any of them and also the Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders whatsoever of all and singular the premises with the Appurtenances And all Rents and yeerly Profits whatsoever reserved upon any Demise Lease Estate or Grant Demises Leases Estates or Grants heretofore made or granted of the before mentioned premises or any part or parcel thereof And also all the Estate Right Title Interest Use Possession Reversion Remainder Claim and Demand whatsoever of them the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas earl of Arundel and Surrey and of William Lord Howard and of every of them of in or into the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field and other the before mentioned premises or of in or to every or any part or parcel hereof And further the said Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and VVilliam Lord Howard for the considerations aforesaid Have Granted Bargained Sold and by these presents do grant bargain and sell unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever All and every the Deeds Charters Evidences Writings Counterpains of Lease and Leases Indentures Exemplifications Letters Patents Transcrips of Fines and Recoveries Terrers Court Rolls Surveis Presentments Boundaries Escripts and Minuments whatsoever touching or in any wise only concerning the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard H. or the late dissolved Charter-H besides Smith-f To have to hold the said Houses Buildings Orchards Gardens Closes Inclosures Tenements Hereditaments and all other the premises before or in or by these presents bargained and sold or mentioned intended or meant to be bargained and sold and every part and parcel thereof with their Appurtenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the sole only and proper use and behoof of him the said Thomas his Heirs and Assigns for ever more absolutely without any manner of Condition Redemption or Revovation in any wise And the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk his Heirs and the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the Charter-House and all and singular other the before mentioned premises with all their and every of their Appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk and his Heirs and all and every other person or persons claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for ever more defend by these presents And the said Theophilus Lord Howard his Heirs the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the Charter-House and all and singular other the before mentioned premises and every part thereof with the apputenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said Theophilus Lord Howard and his Heirs and all and every other person and persons lawfully claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for evermore defend by these presents And the said Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and his Heirs the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House