2048. Brownlow Continuance of the Extent where the writ is awarded in one County At which day here cometh the Conusee by his Attorney aforesaid and the said Sheriff hath done nothing therein nor sent the Writ thereof therefore as before let another Writ be thereof made to the same sheriff in form aforesaid returnable â—ere in Octab. S. Michaelis c. T. 5 Eliz. rot 373. Monmouth ss A Capias ad satisfaciend awarded after the Sheâ—iff had returned upon an Elegit that the Dâ—fendant had no goods noâ— lands At which day here came the said W. by his Attorney aforesaid and the Sheriff of the said County of Middlesex now returneth that the said C hath no goods nor chattells in his Bailiwick which he could deliver to the said W. and that the sayd C at the said 15. Novem. Pas nor at any time afterwards had any lands or tenements in his Bayliwick whereof he could deliver a moiety to the said W as by the said Writ to him it was commanded and hereupon the said W prayeth a Writ of the sayd Lady the Queen of taking the said C to be directed to the Sheriffs of London where the Originall Writ first issued and it is granted to him c. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they take the said C if c. and him safely keep so that they might have his body here in Cr. S. Martini to satisfie the said W of the debt and pamages aforesaid and see the Roll 381. see 17 E 4 fol. 4 After the return of a Nichil upon an Elegit after judgment in a Scire facias the Defendant prayeth a Capias ad satisfaciendum and hath it and with this case Hobart and Winch agree as at large appeareth in Foster and Jacksons case in Mich 12 Iac. but Warburton and Nicholls were of a contrary opinion 34 H 6 f. 20 a. with this opinion Littleton agreeth Entry of a case in the proper County and Non inventus returned and a Testat ca. sat awarded into a forraigne County M 19 Iac. rot 510. Brownlow Norfolk ss The Sheriff was commanded that he should take H P late of London scrivener if c. and safe c. so that he should have his body here a die S. M in und mensem to satisfie I C of twenty seven pounds and foure shillings which to the same John were adjudged for his Damages which he sustained by occasion of not performing of certain premisses and assumptions to the same John by the said Henry at London in the County aforesaid done whereof he is convicted and now here at this day cometh the said Iohn by E H his Attorney and the Sheriff now returneth that he is not found c. And hereupon it is testified in the same Court of the King here on the behalfe of the said Iohn London that the said Henry doth lye hid and run from place to place in London Therefore the Sheriffs of London are commanded that they take the same Henry if c. and safely c. so that they may have his body here in Octab S. Martini to satisfie to the said Iohn of his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid c. Entry of a Capias ad satisfaciend M 2. and 3. Eliz Dyer fol 193. pl. 29. Cepi corpus returned M 2 and 3 Eliz. rot 1239 Lennard Middlesex ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should take Francis Kemp Gent. if c. safely c. so that he should have his body here at this day to wit in Cr S. Martini to satisfie Christopher Rich Gent one of the Attorneyes c. according to the Liberties and priviledges c. of one hundred and four pounds which to the same C in the same Court here were adjudged for his damages which he sustained by occasion of a cereaine trespasse to the same C by the same F with force and armes and contrary to the peace of the said Lady the Queene now at C in the County aforesaid done whereupon it is considered c. And now here at this day came the said C in his proper person and the Sheriff to wit T R and C D now return that he before the coming of the sayd Writ took the body of the said F K by virtue of another Writ of the Lady the Queen of capiend in a plea of trespasse against the same Francis at the suit of the said Creturnable here Die Sabbati next after Tres Michaelis last past and after the coming of the said first Writ and before the return of the same the same sheriff also took the body of the same Francis by virtue of this writ the body notwithstanding of the same Francis at the same day of Saturday in the same former Writ specified before the Justices here at Westminster caused to be brought as the same first Writ in it selfe doth exact and require whereupon the same now F present here in Court is committed to the prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to continue c. Afterwards to wit the twentieth day of November that same Terme came here into the Court the same Francis in his proper person by the Warden of the prison of the Fleet brought here to the barr and delivered to the Justices here a Writ of the Lady the Queen closed to them directed in these words Elizabeth c. A Writ of mainprise out of Chancery directed to the Justices to baile the Defendant being in Execution and to prosecute an attaint upon that whereupon he is in execution To her faithfull and beloved Iames Dyer Knight and his associates our Justices of the Bench greeting Whereas F. K. hath arrayed before you by our Writ a certain jury of twenty four Knights to make a jury by whom a certain Inquisition was late taken before you at Westminster by our Writ between Christopher Rich Gent. one of the Attorneyes c. in the same Bench the same Francis in a certain Trespasse to the same Christopher by the same Francis done as it is sayd on the part of the same F. we have received That he by pretence of the process in the said plea of Trespasse made is taken and detained in our prison of the Fleet insomuch as he cannot prosecute the sayd Jury Whereupon hee supplicated us to exhibit to him a fit remedy we willing that the same Francis may be so detained in our Prison as that he may and ought to prosecute the Jury we command you that if the same Francis shall find to you sufficient maintainers who shall undertake to have him before you to prosecute against him or that he should not prosecute that Attaint aforesaid and the Attaint determined if it should passe against him or that he should not prosecute that Attaint that hee should render himselfe to our prison aforesaid and to satisfie as well in that which to us to the same Christopher in that which belongeth to him in
the premisses And further to do and receive what our Court shall consider of in this behalf then you cause the same Francis to be delivered out of prison upon such baile to prosecute his Attaint aforesaid witnesse our selfe at Westminster the ninth day of November Anno 2. And hereupon here came R. G. Knight and A K Esquire in their proper persons and undertook for the same Francis that he here at the Term in the sayd Writ of Attaint contained and so from day to day at every day of the plea therein untill judgment be given therein should appear and that the same F K. should prosecute his Writ with effect and if it shal happen judgment against him to be given in this behalfe that hee shall render himselfe to the prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet there for the occasion aforesayd to stay untill c. to wit each of them under the penalty of 200 l. which each of them acknowledgeth to be levyed of their Lands and Chattles to the use of the said C. If it shall happen the sayd Fr. K. not to prosecute her writ aforesayd with effect or at any day of the Plea aforesaid therein to make default or that judgment therein be given against him shall not render himselfe to the Prison of the Fleet in the same untill hee shall have satisfied the same C. for his damages aforesaid to abide c. And in the meane time the said Fr. is dismissed from the custody aforesaid by bayle aforesaid And also the sayd Ro. and Ant. undertook to wit each of them in 200 l. for the same Fr. that the same Fr. shall render himselfe to the Prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet and satisfie the said Lady the Queen of that which belongeth to her if the Attaint aforesaid shall passe against the said Francis Dismissed upon baile or that the same Francis shall not prosecute his writ aforesaid therein And further that the same Francis shall do and receive what the Court of the said Lady the Queen shall consider in their behalfe which said 200 l. both of the Manucaptors aforesaid acknowledged to be levied of their Lands and Chattles aforesaid to the use of the said Ric. If it shall happen the said Fr. K. in any of the premisses to be don do make default towards the Lady the Queen And in the meane time the same Fr. is dismissed from the custody aforesaid by the bayle aforesaid c. Afterwards to wit the 11. day of February then next following came here in to the Court the same Christopher in his proper person and acknowledgeth that he is satisfied of the same 200 l. above to him acknowledged therefore the same Ro. O. and Ant. K. of the said 200 l. to the same C. in forme aforesaid acknowledged are quiet Satisfaction c. Commitment P 23 H. 7. rot 284. James Hobert who followeth for the Lady the Queene came here in Court the 10. Speciall commitment for levying of a Fine in the name of another person which had first refused to a knowled day of May An. 13. Reg. nunc and gave the court here to understand that whereas R. T. others the 4. day of Ianuary An. Regni R. nunc 13. out of the court of Chancery of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster had prosecuted 4. severall Writs of the said King against Miles Harconet Esq and Ann his wife to the Sheriffe of the county of Oxon. Leci Sussex and Surr. severally directed by which said writs so directed to the Sheriffs aforesaid the King commanded that justly c. they should hold to the said I. T. and R. covenants between them made of the Mannor of E in the county of G. and of the Mannor of D. in the county of Leic. And of the Mannor of P in the county of Sussex and of the Mannor of D. in the county of Surr. whereupon the said Miles and Ann. the third day of February Ao 13. abovesaid before Io. Vavasor one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the Bench the said I. U. then having power to receive the acknowledgment of such Fine between the said Miles and Ann and the same Ro. Io and T. of the Mannors and Tenements aforesayd with the appurtenancus at Shorditch in the county of Midd. the same Miles being examined made his acknowledgment there and the same Ann to make any acknowledgment in the premisses that any Fine from thence afterwards might be levied upon her acknowledgment then and there altogether refused and denyed And afterwards the said Miles and Iohn Mill of London Gent indevouring the sayd Ann malitiously to hurt disinherit and defraud falsely and fradulently stirred up and councelled a strange woman to assert and affirme that she was the wise of the said Miles and shee under the name of the said Ann Wife of the said Miles acknowledged upon the Writs aforesaid that a Fine upon her acknowledgment and the acknowledgment of the said M. as afore is sayd taken and recorded might be made and levied By pretext of which said counsell and exitation to the said Io. Mill the sayd strange Woman under the name of Ann the wife of the sayd Miles afterwards to wit the 8. day of February before the said Io. Vava c. at Bedlam in the Parish c. at the instance and request of the sayd Miles and Io. Mill came in their owne persons And then and there the said strange woman falsly deceitfully and maliciously under the name of Ann wife of the said Miles acknowledged the Mannor and Tenement aforesaid as in the concord with warranty of Miles and his heires against all men to the disinheritance of the sayd Ann and her heires in contempt of the Lord the King now and pernitious example of his Leige People the said Iohn Vavasor then perceiving she the sayd woman not to be the wife of the said M And prayeth that the say Miles Io M. and the said strange woman may be punished to the example of others And prayeth processe may be made against them to be directed to the Sheriff of Midd. to Attach them to answer the said Lord the King of and upon the Premisses And of and upon such things which on the behalfe of the sayd Lord the King shall be then and there objected against them and it is granted to her retornable here upon Wednesday next following At which day here came the said Iohn Mill in his proper person by vertue of the Writ aforesaid taken and brought to the bar And thereupon the sayd Iohn Mill is committed to the Prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet by occasion of the premisses there to stay untill c. M 9. H. 7. rot 295. Attachment was awarded against Pecock to do and receive c. A Commitment for sorging of writ counterfeiting of the Seale and at a day the said I. P. was by the Sheriff brought to the barr
time hath withdrawn and absented himselfe without the licence of the cheif Clerk of the Lord the King of the common Bench here to whom the gift of the same Office belongeth And without the licence of Rob. Dierby cheif Justice of the Court here So that the same Office by the same Io. or any clerk for him or in his name remained a long time undon and unoccupyed to the prejudice of divers Leige People of the Lord the King and delay of their Suits Wherupon upon the complaints of divers of the same Leige people who intend to prosecute such writs of Nisi Prius and other Jurats intending to deliver writs of Dedi Potestatem and acknowledgment of Fines here in Court And not having such clerk ready in Court who should receive and make such writs and Jurats upon the 20. day of October this Term it is besought aswell by Peter Stainford who had occupyed that Office for the same Iohn in the life time of Iohn Quick Deputy of the said Iohn at divers times at the intreaty of the said Iohn Quick in his absence as his clerk in other precedent Terms by the licence of the chife justice here As also by Thomas Thorold under Keeper of the Writs and Roles of the Lord the King of this Court that if they or either of them to the same Office for the same Io. Cheker and in his name would attend and the writs and Records due to be made in that Office for the same Iohn and in his name he or they would Receive write and do who said severally that not By which the same Iohn the same day of Friday in the morrow of the same day was solemnly called to exercise the Office aforesaid and appeared not wherupon he by the consideration of the said Court here is removed from his said Office and William Snayth at the nomination of the said cheife cleark here in the Court faithfully to extrcise and occupy that Office on the same morrow was admitted and sworne to have and hold that Office as the Philizers Exegenters and other officers of our Lord the King here hold and occupy their offices M 22. Iac. Rot. 436. Brownlow Foringden of a Cryer of the Court for his non attendance upon the Court nor any cause shewn to the Court for his absence T. 15 E 4. f 26. T 15 E 4 f. 7. P. 6. Caâ— Rot 1314. Admission of a Cryer upon the surrender of Hyliard Bee it remembred that George Baker one of the Cryers of this court who to the office of one of the Cryers of their Court was before sworne and admitted well and faithfuly to exercise and occupy the same To whose office it apperteineth to attend every Law day in court here in his proper person and to do in the Court those things which belong to the Office of a Cryer of this Court to be done three severall dayes to wit 19. of November 20. November and 22. of November this terme in full Court being solemnly called to attend his office of Crier aforesaid as of right he ought to have don came not but himselfe from his Office aforesaid the same three daies by the space of 5. years last past more without the licence of the court here absented and withdrew himselfe no cause of his absence to the Court here by any on the behalfe of the said Georg being shewen Therefore the same Georg by the consideration of the court here is removed from further exercising of his Office of Cryer here And Robert Hylyard at the nomination and presentation of Walter Zankey Esquire to whome the gift of the Office aforesaid belongeth faithfully to exercise and occupy that Office the 24. day of November this term by the Court here is admitted and sworne to have exercise and occupy the office aforesaid as the other Cryers of the court here have and occupy their Offices c. H 31. Eliz. Rot. 1720 Be it remembred that the 27. Attorney of the Common Bench for that he forged a Writ of Sup. de non molestando upon an Utlary where no Writ of Error was sued out of the Chancery for warrant the same And the party outlawed thereupon was delivered out of prison was committed to the Fleet. And because he could not gainsay but confessed the same that he had forged the same Writ it was awarded that he should not entermeddle more in the Office of an attorney but should lose his priviledge of the same and that his name should be taken out of the attorneys Roll and that he should be forjudged the Court and thrown over the bar and fined at 5 l. and should be sent to the severall Courts to be inspected and was sworn thereunto and after he was shorne he was thrown over the barre day of January that same term came here in court one Richard Hillington one of the Attornies of the Court here in his proper person and for that he by the Tye of his Oath in his office of attorney made the falsehood if he shall understand any in the Court here to be don or perpetrated is bound with that speed which is convenient to reveale and certify to the Court here gave to the Court here to understand that E.G. one of the attornies of the Bench here in the exercise of his Office of an Attorney to the scandall of the Court here and in falsity and deceipt of the same Court behaved himself and Fradulently For that to wit whereas certaine Iohn Vernon and Richard Carter lately in the Court of the Lady the Queen now of the common Bench here have impleaded Ric. Michell late of M. in the County of S. Yeamon W. M. late c. And Iohn M. late c. in a plea of Debt and the same R. W. and I. O. for that they came not before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here to answer the said Io. Vernon and R. Carter therein they were put in Exigent in the County of the City of the said Lady the Queen at Oxford to be utlawed and upon that occasion were afterwards ut-Lawed And afterwards the same Io. Michell by vertue of a certain Writ of the Lady the Queen of Capias Vtlagat upon the utlawry aforesaid to the sheriff of of Surry in this behalfe taken and in prison of the said Lady the Queen and under the custody of the said Sheriff was detayned the same Edward Osbulston not having the feare of God before his eyes nor his oath that he should not do any falsehood in the same Court fearing a certaine false Writ under the name of the Lady the Queen caused to be written made counterfeited the tenor whereof Followeth in these words Elizabeth c. reciting the Superse de non molest T. Edmund Anderson of Westminster the 28. day of Nov. An. c. 31. whereas no Writ of Error out of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen to the same Edmond Anderson was directed by
Cognizee of lands extended by extent upon statute merchant but not delivered to him for that the Conusor dyed and the hâ—ir at the time of the inquisition taken was within age but now at full age if it do appeare to the Sheriff that the heire is of â—u â— age See the Statute for Merchants 13 E. 1. accord It was commanded the Sheriff whereas the Lady the Queen by her certain Writ out of the Court of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster in the Terme of the Holy Trinity Anno Reg. c. 38. issuing and directed to the Sheriff of the County of Hereford reciting by the said Writ That whereas the sayd Lady the Queene had commanded the Sheriff of Middlesex by her said writ that the bodyes of E. W. of D. in the County c. and I.T. of W. in the same County c. if they were lay men found in his Bailâ—wick he should take should safely keep in the prison of the said Lord the King untill they had fully satisfied S. B. of W c. of fifty pounds which the same E. and I. the second day of Iuly Anno 23. Eliz. before R. N. and R. C. then Bayliffs of the City of W. and keepers of the greater peice of the seale of the statute Merchant there and W. I. Gent. then Clarke of the City aforesaid and keeper of the lesser part of the seale of Statute Merchant aforesaid Deputed to take acknowledgment of such Statutes for Debt for Merchants at the City aforesayd acknowledged themselves to owe to the said S. which they ought to have paid unto him at the Feast of Saint Michael the Arch Angell then next following and they have not payd the same unto him as it is said and in as much as the said Sheriff of Middlesex shall have executed the precept of the said Lady the Queen he should make appear to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here in 8 Hillarii Anno 37 Reginae Nunc and the said sheriff of Middlesex to the Justices of the sayd Lady the Queene here at Westminster at that day returned that the same W and I. were Lay men and were not found in his Bailiwick and to the Sheriff of Hereford commanded that all the goods and chattells of the same E and I. and all the Lands and Tenements whereof the same E and I. at the day of the acknowledgement of the Debt aforesaid Recitall of the Writ of extent or at any time afterwards were seised to whose hands soever they should come unlesse to any heire within age by hereditary Descent they should descend he should deliver to the said S by reasonable price and extent To hold the goods and chattells aforesaid as his proper goods and chattells and the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his free Tenement to him and his Assignes according to the form of the Statute therein made and provided untill the Debt aforesaid together with his reasonable and necessary Damages and costs as in Labours Suits Delayes and Expences he should levy thereof And neverthelesse That hee should take the bodyes of the sayd E. and I. and should safely keepe them in the prison of the sayd Lady the Queen untill they should satisfie the sayd S. of the Debt aforesayd in forme as aforesaid and in as much as that precept of the Lady the Queen should be executed he should make appear to the Iustices of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster in Octob Sancti Michaelis Anno 38. abovesaid and that he should have then there the Writ aforesaid the same Sheriff of Hereford to the Iustices of the sayd Lady the Queen here at VVestminster The Sheriff returneth that the Conusors are dead Inquisition taken and the Lands extended but the Lands descended to an infant and the Sheriff by reason of his nonage could not deliver them to the Conusees at the said 8 S. Mich. returned that the same E. and I. were dead and also to the same Iustices of the sayd Lady the Queen here at that day returned a certain Inquisition before him the sayd sheriff of Hereford by vertue of a certain Writ to him therein directed at K. in the County of Hereford the thirteenth day of S. Anno 38. abovesaid by the oath of twelve honest and lawfull men of the County of Hereford was taken by which it was found that the same E. I. were dead after the acknowledgment of the Debt aforesaid and long before the taking of the said inquisition and that the same I the day whereon he dyed was seised in his Demesne as of Fee of and in four Closes or parcells of pasture lying and being in H within the parish of L. in the same County of Hereford containing by estimation fifteen acres c. as in the Inquisition And the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances were worth by the year in all issues besides Reprizes sixty shillings and that the same I.T. of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in forme aforesaid being seized after the acknowledgement of the Debt aforesaid and before the coming of the sayd Writ dyed thereof seised after whose Death The lands discend to the heir within age the Tenements aforesayd with the Appurtenances descended to one I.T. son and heir of the said I. T the son at the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid was within the age of one and twenty yeares to wit of twenty yeares and no more so that the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said S. by reason of the minority of the said I.T. the son he could not deliver according to the Tenor of the said writ to him therein directed and that the said E. at the time of the acknowledgement aforesaid made or at any time afterwards had no Lands or Tenements in the County of Hereford as by the Record and proceedings therein in the Court of the said Lady the Queen here plainly appeareth Suggestion that the heir is of full age And now in the Court of the said Lady the Queen before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster it is alledged that the said I.T. the son is come to his full age of one and twenty yeares and hath of a long time been of full age therefore the said Lady the Queene doth command the said Sheriff of Hereford that if it can appeare to the said Sheriff that the same I.T. came to his full age of one and twenty yeares before the issuing forth of this Writ and now to be then the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances by the Extent aforesaid in forme aforesaid made he should deliver to the said S. to hold as his free Tenement to him and his Assignes according to the forme of the Statute aforesaid thereof made and provided untill the Debt aforesaid Liberate conditionall that if it could appear to the sheriff that the heir is at full age together with reasonable and necessary Damages and Costs as
together and undâ—videdly doe hold 20. Mes 6. mills 20. Gardens 2000. acres of land 500. acres of Meadow 1000. acres of Pasture 2000. acres of wood 2000 acres of Furs and heath and 500. acres of land covered with water with the appurtenances in Balcombe Tuck-feild Slewham Crawley and Porth the same Walter to make partition thereof between them according to the Forme of the statute in such case provided gainsayeth and unjustly permited not the same to be don and against the Form of the statute aforesaid And the same Walter in the Court of the King here well granteth that partition thereof be made by which it was considered in the same Court of the Lord the King here that partition should be made between the parties aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances That taking with him 12. Free and lawfull men of the neighborhoods of B. C. S. C. and W. by whom c. he should come in his proper person unto the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and in the presence of the parties aforesaid by the same Sheriffe to be premonished if they will be present the same Tenements with the appurtenance by the oath of honest and lawfull men of his county respect being had to the true value of the same Tenements with the appurtenances he should cause to be parted into two equall parts and one part of the sâ—me Tenements with the appurtenances to the same Edward and the other part of the same Tenements with the appurtenances residue to the same Walter to hold to them in severalty he should cause to be delivered and assigned so that neither the said Edward nor the same Walter may have more of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances then belongeth to them to have and that the said Edward of his purpart to the same Edward out of the tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapning And the same Walter of his purpart to the same Walter out of the tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapning may severally apportion themselves and that partition by the same sheriff distinctly and openly made he should make appeare here in Oct. S. Mich. under his seale and the seales of them upon whose oath that partition shall be made and that he should have here the names of them upon whose oath he should make that Inquisition and that writ And now here at this day came the same Edward by Robert Moyle his attorney and the sheriff to wit Nicholas Eversfeild Esq now retorneth here a Certaine partition between the parties aforesaid of the tenements aforesaid by the same sheriff before him by vertue of the writ aforesaid and according to the Form of the said writ by the oath of 12 c. made which followeth Sussex ss I. N. E. sheriff of the county aforesaid to the Justices of the Lord the King do certifie by vertue of a writ therein to me directed and to this schedule annexed the seventh day of August An. c. 18. See the new book of Entries title Partition fo 411. such a form took with mee I. F the elder I. F. the younger and ten others twelve Free and lawfull men of the Neighbourhoods of B. C. S. C. and W. in the same writ specified I came in my proper person to the tenements in the same writ specified to wit to 20 Mess 20. Gardens 2000. acres of Land 500 acres of Meadow 1000. acres of pasture 2000. acres of Wood 2000. acres of Furze and heath and 500. acres of Land covered with water in B. C. S. C. and W. in the same writ mentioned And there by their oath respect being had to the true value of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in the presence of the parties in the same writ named by me the same sheriff premonished the same Tenements into two equall parts with the appurtenances I have made to be parted and one part of the Tenements aforsaid with the appurtenaces to wit one Capitall Messuage or mansion house called T. with the appurtenances c. and so receite the parcells c. I have caused to be delivered and assigned to Edward Culpeper Knight in the same writ named for his purpart of the Tenements aforesaid to hold to the same Edward in severalty by himself as by meets and bounds they are now divided And an other part of the same Tenements with the appurtenances that is to say one Messuage called the glovers house otherwise Gardners farm c. And so receit the other particulars c. 2. Part. I have câ—used to be delivered and assigned to Walter Covert Knight in the same writ likewise named for his purpart of the Tenements aforesaid to hold to the same Walter in severalty by himself as by meets and bounds they are now divided so that the same Edward of his purpart of the same Edward out of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapâ—ing And the same Walter of his purpart to the same Walter out of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in Form aforesaid hapning may severally apportion themselves as by the same writ it was commanded to me in Testimony whereof aswell I the same sheriff as the Jurors aforsaid to this partition have severally put our seales the day and yeare abovesaid Judgment that the paâ—tion be held fâ—â—m amd stable Therefore it is considered that the partition aforesaid be held Firm and Staple for ever Note that at the retorn of this writ of particion Hickham the Kings Serjeant at Law and of councell with the defen Sr. Walter Covert Knight came to the bar and moved that the partition might be quashed and that a new Writ to make partition might issue For that the partition was not Legally made by the sheriff And upon much debate in Court the 4 Judges Hobort Warborton Winch and Hutton ordered Sr. Walter Covert to pay to Sr. Edw. Colpeper 3500 l. for his part wherewith the parties are agreed and Sr. Walter Covert in joyed the lands aforesaid and the writ was not Filed nor the judgment entred but I added it to the partition because of the presedent Plur. Replegiare M 6. 7. Eliz. Rot. 423. Entry of a wrâ— of Plur. replegiare Otherwise as it appeareth in the time of the holy Trinity An. 6. Regin nunc Rot. 621 It is thus contayned Derb ss It was commanded the sheriff that whereas of late the Qu. had more times commanded the said sheriff that instantly and without delay he should make replevy to M. S. widow a certaine oxe which E. T. and W. T. took and unjustly detayned c. Or the sheriff of the County aforesaid should be before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at VVestminster in Oct. S. Mich. An. 4 Reg. nunc to shew wherefore he contemned to execute the command of the Lady the Queen so often to him therein directed And the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at the day of the retorne that
no other writ besides that writ came to his hands thereof And that he could not deliver the oxe aforesaid to the said Margaret For that the said E. and W. claimed the propriety of that Oxe by the command and to the use of Ralph L. his Master The said Lady the Queen being unwilling that the said Margaret should be defrauded of the said Oxe by such a false retorne Property claimed by the defendant of the goods distrained but being willing without delay to replevy him to the said M. If he should be Summoned according to the Law and custome of the Realme of the Lady the Queen of England by her writ commanded the said sheriff that taking with him the Keepers of the pleas of the Crowne of the said Lady the Queen in the presence of the said Marg. and of the said Ralph Edmond and W. by the same sheriff to be premonished if they will be present by the oath of honest and Lawfull men of the county aforesaid by whom the truth of the matter may be the better knowne he diligently inquire whether the propriety of the said Oxe should be to the said M. or to the said R. L. and if he shall find by that Inqisition that the propriety of that Oxe should be in the said M. then without delay he should replevy him to the said M. according to the Tenor of the command of the said Lady the Queen at other times to the said sheriff directed A Writ of proprietate probanda awarded and should put by sureties and safe pledges the said Edmon and VVilliam that they should be before the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at VVestminster in Oct. S. Trin. then next following to answer aswell the said Lady the Queen of the contempt as to the said Margaret of the damages and injuries to her in this behalf don and the said sheriff to the Justices of the Lady the Queen here at that day retorned that he took with him the Kepers of the pleas of the Crown of the said Lady the Queen Property found in the Plaintiff and that the Oxe is eloyned in the presence of the Parties aforesaid by the oath of 12 c. And made diligent Inquisition of and upon the premisses by which it was found that the propriety of the Oxe aforesaid then and at the time of the taking of the same was the said Margarets And that the said Oxe before the comming of the writ aforesaid was eloyned and the said E. and W. to places unknowne to the said sheriff so that he could not replevy the said Oxe to the said Margaret Capias in Withernam awarded of the defendants Cattle as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And the said sheriff also retorneth that the said E. and W. have nothing in his Bayliwick by which they could be attached wereupon the said sheriff the said Lady the Queen now commandeth that of other cattle of the said E. W to the value of the Oxe aforesaid before taken he should take in Withernam and deliver them to the said M. to hold to her untill the said Oxe before taken should be retorned and in as much c. he should make appeare here to wit at Westminster in Ost. S. Hil. An. 5. Eliz. The Lady the Queen also commanded to the said sheriff that he should take the said E. and W. if c. and them safely keep Capias for contempt so that he should have their bodies here at the same Terme to answer aswell the said Lady the Queen for the contempt of the said M. for damages and injuries to her in that behalf don And the said Sheriff to the said Justices here to wit at Westminster at the said 8. Hilli retorneth that the said E. and W. had no Cattle in his Bayliwick which he could take in Withernam As by the said writ it was commanded him Return that the defendants had no Cattle that could be taken in Withernam and not to be found as to the Capias for contempt nor were found in the same whereupon the Queen commanded the said sheriff as other times she had commanded him that he should take the said E. and W. if c. and them safe c. so that he should have their bodies here to wit at Westminster in 8. Pur. S. Mariae then next following to answer to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt aforesaid as to the said M. of the damages and injuries to her in this behalfe don And the said sheriff to the said justices here to wit at Westminster the said Oct. Pu. B. Mariae retorneth that the said R. and W. were not found in his Bayliwick whereupon the said Lady the Queen commanded the said She. as more times she had him commanded Capias awarded geneâ—ally that he should take the same E. and W. if c and safely c. so that he should have their bodies here to wit at Westminster 15. Pas then next following to answer aswell the said Lady the Queen of the contempt aforesaid as to the said M. of the damages and injuries to her in this behalf don non invent â—ened And the same sheriff to the said Justices here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at the said 15. Pas retorned that the said E. and W. were not found in his Bayliwick whereupon the Qu. commanded the said sheriff quod exigi Fac. the said E. W. from County to County untill c. if not Exigent awarded c if c. then he should take them and safely keep them so that he should have their bodies here to wit at Westminster in Oct. S. Mich. then next following to answer aswell to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt aforesaid as to the same M. of the damages and injuries to her in this behalfe don adjornment of the time at which said Oct. S. Mich. The plaint aforesaid was adjorned by writ of the Lady the Queen de Com. adjorna mento Further adjorment at Westminster untill Oct. S. Hil. then next following At which day here to wit at Westminster the Plaint aforesaid was Further adjorned by writ of the said Lady the Queen de Com. adjornamento from VVestminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the said Lady the Queen of Hertford Non mi. bre in the county of Hertf. untill 15. Hilarii then next following at which day before the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen at the Castle of Herf the said sheriff sent not the Writ whereupon the Lady the Qu. commanded to the said sheriff that he should of new put in exigent the said E. W. from county to county untill c. they should be utlawed if not Exigi fac de Novo awarded c. then they should take them them safely keep so that they should have their bodies here before the said Iustices at the said Castle of Hertf in Octab.
Sancti Tri. then next following Adjâ—uâ—ment of the Terme to answer as well to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt c. as to the said M. of Damages and injuries to her in this behalfe done before which said Octob. S. Trin. the plaint aforesaid was adjourned by writ of the said Lady the Queen De C. adjornamento from the said Castle of Herford unto Westminster aforesaid Plaintiff and Defendants appear by Attornyes And now here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at the same day to wit at the said 8. S. Trin. came as well the said M. by T. H. her Attorney as the said E. and W. by L. S. their Attorney and hereupon the said M. declaring against the said E. and W. in the plaint aforesayd complaineth that the said E. and W. the twenty fourth day of June Anno 4. Eliz at O in a certaine place called B took the said Oxe of the said M. price eight pounds Count in replevin for cattell and the value c. and that the Defendant may gage deliverance and him unjustly detained against sureties and pledges c. whereupon she said that c. damages twenty pounds and thereupon bringeth suit c. and prayeth that the said E. and W. may gage deliverance of the Oxe aforesaid and the sayd E. and W. pray license to imparle here untill 8 Mich. and have it c. the same day is given to the said M. here c. And now here at this day to wit 8 Mich. came as well the said M as the said E and VV. by their Attornyes aforesaid Nil dicit A writ to enquire of damages for taking the oxe awarded Quere if it ought not to be also of the value c. and nothing in Bar or preclusion of the Action c. as in others untill without defence for which the said M her Damages by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Oxe aforesaid against the said E. and VV. ought to recover but because it is not known what Damages the sayd M. sustained by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Oxe aforesaid the Sheriff is commanded that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the County aforesaid he diligently enquire what Damages the said M. sustained as well by occasion of the premisses as for her costs and charges by her about her suit in this behalfe layd out and the Inquisition which c. The Sheriff make appear here in 8 Hill under his seal and seales c. Entry of a plur repleg A. B. in homine repleg the Sheriff returneth that A is enlarged c. and a. Capias in Withernam of the body of the avowant awarded see F N B fol. 68. agreeth M 32 H. 8. rot 319. Essex ss The Sheriff was commanded as more times that he should replevy A. B. Spinster who E. L. took and taken kept c. or that the same Sheriff should be here at this day to wit in Cro. Ani. to shew wherefore he could not execute the commands of the Lord the King to him so often therein directed at which day the sheriff to wit I. D. Esquire returned that the same A. was enlarged to places to him unknown so that he could not replevy her according to the Tenors of the commands to him therein directed Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that he take the body of E. in Withernam and cause him safely and securely to be kept untill the same A. in forme aforesaid taken may be replevied and if the same Sheriff can replevy the same A. that then the same A shall secure the same sheriff to prosecute her plaint by return of her body if return thereof shall be adjudged then the same sheriff put by sureties and safe pledges the same E. that he be here 15. Hillarii to answer to the said A. of the taking and unjust detaining of the same A and as well to the Lord the King of the contempt as to the said A. of the Damages and Injuries to her in this behalfe offered and in as much c. the same sheriff should make appeare here at the same Terme c M 7 and 8 Eliz. rot 1729. Fylmer London ss Entry of a writ of plur Repl. See M. 7 8 El. rot 245 pl. 67. Dyer this case reported H 12 H 6 rot 316. It was commanded the sheriffs whereas of late more times the Lord the King had commanded the same sheriffs that justly and without delay they should cause to be replevied to William Hurst all the goods and chattells which Richard Millers Knight N.W. and I.S. took and unjustly detained or would signifie the cause to the said Lady the Queene wherefore they would not execute her command otherwise to the same sheriffs therein directed or that they could not and the same sheriffs contemning the commands of the said Lady the Queen to the same William have not replevied his goods and chattells aforesaid or at leastwise hitherto have not regarded to signifie to the said Lady the Queene the cause wherefore they would not or could not do the same in manifest contempt of the said Lady the Queen now and her commands aforesaid and the immoderate Damage and greivance of the said William wherewith the Lady the Queen is very much injured and moved Return thereof Custome of the City of Lond. that when any goods are distrained within the City that they ought to be reâ—levied by plaint within the city before the sheriffs to be levied and not by a writ issuing out of the Chancery Note Dyer fol. 246. That before the statute of Marlebridge cap 21. The Sheriffs by the common Law could not make replevy without a writ that Returne is not made to the said W. of his goods and chattells aforesaid according to the Tenor of the commands of the said Lady the Queen before to them therein directed therefore let the same sheriffs be here at this day to wit in C. A. to shew wherefore they have contemned to execute the commands of the said Lady the Queen so often to them therein directed And now here at this day came the sayd W.H. by T. H. his Attorney and the sheriffs to wit I.R. and I.H. to the Justices here have certified That any Writ of the Lady the Queen to replevy any goods or chattells to the same W.H. besides the Writ aforesaid to the same sheriff or either of them was not delivered and that the City of London is and from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was an ancient City and that within the same City is had and from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was had accustomed used and approved that whensoever any Cattell goods or chattells by the Law of the Land were replevyable within any place of the City aforesaid or liberties thereof were taken that then all such cattell goods and chattells ought and were accustomed by
aforesaid here c. came aswell the same R. as the same R B. in their proper persons and the jurors of the jury aforesaid being called came who being elected tried and sworn to speak the truth of the within contayned said upon their oath ut in Recordo where upon the same Justices at L. peâ—fixed a day to the parties aforesaid before the Justices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench at Westminster Iustice at Lanc. prefixeth a day for the parties to be at West to wit upon Monday nâ—xt after tres Pas next to come to heare their judgment thereof c. therefore c. AFterwards to wit in Oct. Mich. next following Iudgment in Banco after issue tried in the county Pâ—ll of Lanc. upon a mittim of the record there P 4. 5 P. Ma. rot 632. Iudgment in debt here to wit at Westminster which same day the same plaintiff and Defendant have by the prefixment of W R. and N. P. Justices of the said Lady the Queen at L. to heare theire judgment here c. came aswell the said Plaintiff as the said Defendant by their attornies aforesaid and the said Justices at L. sent here his record in these words Afterwards c. whereupon the premisses being seen and by the justices here fully understood it is considered that the said plaintiff recover against the said defendant his debt aforesaid And his damages to ten shillings by the jury here in Form aforesaid assessed and also 40 s. to the same plaintiff at his request for his costs and charges aforsaid by the Court here adjudged of increase which said damages in the whole do amount unto 50 s. and the Defendant in mercy c. P 4. Eliz. Rot. 503. Brownlow ss Entry of a Resuâ— in debt against an heir he prayes the Plaint may cease till plea in age and it was granted and after full age a Resum is awarded against a Baron and Feme P 8 Jac Rot 205. Satisfaction for part It was commanded the sheriff whereas I. H. late of c. Spinster daughter and heire of D. H. Gent. lately called c. in the county of Cornwall Gent late in the Court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England of the Common Bench was summoned to answer E. V. of a plea that she render to him 40 l. which shee then ought him and unjustly detayned for that to wit that whereas the said D. Father of the said Jane whose heir she is in his life time to wit the 21. day of I. An. 22 Eliz Reg. at L. by his certaine bill obligatory which the said S. with the seale of the said D Sealed into the said Court of the Queen brought the date hereof was the same day and year acknowledged himselfe to owe to the said S. 43 l. 16 s. to be paid to the said S. when he shall be thereof required for which payment well and truly to make the said D. had bound his heires executors by the same B. and the said D in his life time of 96 s. thereof to the said S. afterwards satisfied and that the said D. in his life time and the said Jane daughter and heir of the said D. after the Death of the said D. although often required the said 40 l. residue have not rendred but the same to him to render have gainsaid and the same I. to the said D to render yet doth gainesay as the said S. then said The said I. appearing in the said Court of the said Lady the Queen said that she was within the age of 21. Plaint remaineth untill c. yeares And that she intended not nor ought during her minority aforesaid to answer the said S. in the plea aforesaid and prayeth that the plaint aforesaid might remaine unto the full age of the said Jane And because the same S. in the same Court of the Queen did not gainesay that it was considered that the said plaint should remaine untill the full age of the said I. as by the Record thereof in the court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth and whereas the said S. afterwards to wit the 23. day of I. An. Reg. nunc 3. came into the court of the Lord the King before his Justices Averment of the full age of the Feme and that she is married c. And said that the said Jane was of full Age and that the said Jane after that the said plaint remained without day and before the said 23. of Jan An. 3. c. abovesaid to wit such a day and yeare at L. had taken to husband one A. P. Gent. and is now marryed to the said A. Resummon by good summoners the same A and I. his wife that they be before the Justices of the Lord the said King here at this day to wit such a day to heare the record their judgment of the plaint aforesaid that he should then have here the summons and that writ and now here at this day came the same S. by I. H. his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the said A. and I. in the plea aforesaid and they came not Nihil returned And the sheriff to wit N P. Esq now retorneth that they had nothing in his bayliwick whereby they could be summoned and hereupon it is testified in the said court of the Lord the Kâ—ng here that the said A. and I. have sufficient in the county whereby they may be resummoned Testat resummons Therefore the Sheriff of Devo is commanded that he resummon by good summoners the said A. and I. of being here 15. Trini to heare their judgment in the plaint aforesaid the same day is given to the said S. here c. Remissio Recordi The Record remitted Justic Lanc. upon a forraign Voucher P 26 H. 8. rot 337. AFterwards the processe being continued between the parties aforesaid in the plea aforesaid by the Jury put therein between them is respited here untill this day to wit Oct. Mich. then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lord the King assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by forme of the Statute c. on Munday at the Feast of Saint Lawrence next past at Salop in the sayd County of S. first came And now here at this day came the same Executors by their Attorney aforesaid and the same Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Postea c. And because the Court of the King here cannot proceed further in the plaint aforesaid therefore the said plaint is remitted to the Iustices of the said Lord the King of his County Palatine to proceed in the said plaint as of right and according to the Law and Custome of the County Palatine aforesaid is to be done c. And it is sayd to the said F. F. Attorney of the said Executors that the same Executors be before the Iustices of the Lord the King
Tenant had not duly made his execution Suff. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas William Ayleff Esquire Barbara his wife lately in the court of the Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered their seisin against I. A. of the third part of the Mannor of Abbotts with the appurtenances in D. c. and whereas also at the prosecution of the same W. and B out of the said Court of the Lady the Queen here of and upon the judgment aforesaid to wit the 6. day of November An. 42. Eliz. issued forth a certaine writ of the Lady the Queen de Sesina directed to the sheriff of the county aforesaid By which said Writ the said Lady the Queen commanded the said sheriff that he should know that the same W and B. in the Court of the Lady the Queen of the common Bench here to wit at VVestminster aforesaid had recovered their seisin against the said I. of the said third part of the Mannor of Abbotts in the appurtenances and 8 messuages c. with the appurtenances as the Dower of the said Barbara of the indowment of Martin A. her late husband c. whereupon the said Lady the Queen now to the said sheriff commandeth that the said W. and B. full seisin of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to them in severalty by meats and bounds he should cause to be had and in as much as he should that precept of the Lady the Queen he should make appeare to the Justices of the Lady the Qu. here to wit at VVestminster in 8. Hill then next following which said Writ of seisin afterwards to wit the 16. day of Ianuary then next following at Y. aforesaid in the county aforsaid to E. B. Esquire then sheriff of the County aforesaid being was delivered to be executed in Form of Law And also by the information of the said W. and B. the same Lady the Queen hath understood that the said Edward favouring the same I. A. and indeavouring wholely to defraud the same W. and B of the recovery of the third part aforesaid afterwards to wit the 17. day of Jan. An. 43. abovesaid caused to be had to the same W. and B. full seisin of 1 Messuage in E aforesaid late in the tenure c. to hold to the same W. and B as the Dower of the same B. of the Indowment of the said Martin her late husband in the same mannor of A. and to the Tenements and Rents aforesaid in Y. c. contingent as by the Record and proceedings here in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen remayning manifestly appeareth whereas notwithstanding all and singular the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B. by the said Ed. Bacon for the third part of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in Forme aforesaid delivered and assigned are not parcell of the mannor lands and Tenements aforesaid wherof the same W. and B. have recovered their third part in forme as aforesaid to the immoderate damage and grievances of the said W. and B. whereupon they have supplycated the said Lady the Queen to adhibet to them a fit remedy in this behalfe the same Lady the Queen not being willing in any wise to injure the same W. and B. But being willing that compleat justice be don and used to them in this behalfe that by honest c he should make known to the same I. that he should be here at this day to wit in 8. Mi. to shew if any thing c. Wherefore omitting the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned the same W. B seisin and execution of the said third part of the mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof the said W. and B. have recovered their third part in Form as aforesaid according to the Form of the recogniz aforesaid against the same I. ought not to have if c. THe Defendant appeareth and saith that the said W. and A. any further execution of the third part aforesaid of the mannor and Tenements c. aforesaid with the appurtenances by them above recovered against him ought not to have because he sayeth that well true it is c. And confesseth the Recovery the writ of seisin and the return thereupon and that the Defendant entred into the land and further saith That the said messuage 3. acres of Land c. in D. aforesaid to the same W. B by the same E. B. for the third part of the mannor c. in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned are parcell of the mannor and Tenements whereof the same W. B. have recovered their seisin of the third part abovesaid in Form as aforesaid and this c. Judgment for the Tenant upon the demurrer And demurrer for that the writ lyeth not but afterwards an other Writ generall was brought And it was adjudged to be well brought See Hill 25. Rot. 650. P. 9. Jac. rot 656. Entry of a Sci. fac in a Quare Impedit T 30. Eliz. rot 1308. Lincoln ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas Thomas Beverly Gent. in the Court of the Lady the Queen now here to wit in the Term of of S. M. An. Eliz. 28. and 29. before Ed. Anderson Knight and his associats then Justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Bench here by the consideration of the same Court had recovered his presentation against Iohn Arch. Bpp. of Canterbury and G. Cornwall his Clerk of the Church of Somerby in the County aforsaid being void and belonging to his gift by writ of the said Lady the Queen de Quare impedit as by the record and proceeding therein in the same Court here remayning it manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet resteth to be don as by the information of the said Thomas the Queen understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the said Arch Bpp. and Gabriel that they should be here at this day to wit in Cr. S Tri to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Thomas execution against them ought not to have according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came aswell the said Thomas by VVilliam Be. his attorny as the same Arch Bpp. and Gabrill by R. P. their attorney And here upon the said Thomas prayeth Execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch. Bpp. and G. to him to be adjudged Saith nothing but the ordinary c. and the same Arch Bishop defenderth the force and wrong when c. and nothing in Bar of the execution of the said Thomas saith whereby the said Thomas remayneth against the said Arch. Bpp. thereof without defence Therefore it is considered that the same Thomas have execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch-Bishop according to
the Form of the recovery aforesaid by default c. But let execution therein cease The Incumbent pleads in Bar that the writ of Quare impedit depending the plaintiff was utlawed and that he resigned by which it appertained to the Queen to present and the Queen presented him and that he was indicted such a day and after that the plaintiff sued a writ of Error forth to reverse the utlâ—ry and afterwards it was reversed as to have a writ to the Bishop untill the plea between the said Thomas and the said Gabriel be determined c. and the said Gabriel saith that the said Thomas execution upon the judgment aforesaid against him ought not to have because he saith that the said writ of quare impedit depending to wit such a day and yeare certain C. B. Esquire out of the Court of Chancery of the Lady the Queen at VVestminster in the County of Midd. then being prosecuted a certaine Originall writ of the said Lady the Queen against the same Thomas Beverly c. And recite the outlawry Therefore he by the judgment of W. D. and T. G. then Coroners of the said Lady the Queen of the County aforesaid was utlawed after wich said utlawry against the same Thomas B. in Form aforesaid published remayneth reversed or adnulled and after the said recovery of the presentations aforesaid in the said writ of Scire facias specified to wit the first day of December An. Rn. c. 23. the same Gabriel being then Parson of the Church of Somerby aforesaid at Somerby aforesaid on his owne accord resigned the same Church into the hands of William then Bpp. of Lincoln ordinary of that place whereof the Church aforsaid was then void By pretext whereof the right of the presentation to the same Church being so void by force of the utlawry aforesaid as is before said then being in his strength to the said Lady the Queen belonged the same Lady the Queen to the said Church being so void afterwards to wit the third day of December An. Regni sui 9. by her letters Patents which the said Gabriel with the Great Seale of England Sealed bringeth here into the Court whose date is at Westminster in the County of Midd. the same day and year Presented the same Gabriel her Clerk and the same Gab. by vertue of the presentation afterwards to wit the 5 day of December An. 29. abovesaid was admitted and instituted in the same and afterwards and before the day of the purchasing of the said Writ of Scire facias to wit the 16. day of December An. 29. abovesaid the same Gabriel into the Church aforesaid was inducted by pretext whereof the said Church was full and yet is of the same Gab. by the presentation of the said Lady the Queen after which said admission institution induction of the said Gabriel into the Church aforesaid to wit the 13. day of February An. Rn. 29. abovesaid the same Thomas Beverly prosecuted out of the same Court of Chancery aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid then being a certain writ of the said Lady the Qu. De Errore corrigendo to her beloved and faithfull Edm. Anderson Knight directed By which said writ the said Lady the Queen now reciteth by the said Writ that because in the Record and Procedings and also in publishing the said utlawry against the said Thomas in the County of Lincoln aforesaid published and before the same E. A. and his associates then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench as is said retorned manifest error hath intervened to the great Damage of the said Thomas as by his complaint the Queen understood the same Lady the Queen willing the error if any be in due manner to be corrected and to the same Thomas full and speedy Justice may be don in this behalf commanded the said Edmond Anderson that if the utlawry aforesaid before the said Edmond and his associats aforesaid in the bench aforesaid be returned so it was said then the record and processe of the utlawry aforesaid with all things touching them to the said Lady the Queen under your Seale you distinctly and plainly send and that Writ so that we may have them a die Pas in tres Sept. then next following wheresoever we shall be in England that viewing the Record and proceedings aforesaid we have cause further to be don thereupon for correcting the said Error that of right and according to the Law and custom of the Lady the Queen of E. ought to be done by vertue of which writ de err corig the same E. A. the record and proceedings aforesaid whereof mention is made in the said writ of Error Certificat of the utlawry upon the writ of Error to the said Lady the Qu at W. aforesaid at the said tr Sep. Pas under his seal sent according to the form and effect of the said writ the Tenor of which Record and proceedings follow in these words Pleas at W. before E. A. Kr. and his associats Justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Bench of E Term An. of the reign of El. by the grace of God c. 28. rot 1209. Lincoln ss Charles Bawdes Esquire by his attorney offered himself the 4. day against Thomas Baverley c of A plea wherefore with force and armes c. And he came not c. therefore the sheriff was commanded that he attach him c. and the sheriff now returneth that he hath nothing c. therefore let him be taken that he may be here Tli die At which day there came the said Charles by his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the said Thomas in the plea aforesaid and he cannot And the sheriff was commanded that he should take him c. and the sheriff now returneth that he is not found c. Therefore as before let him be taken that he be here Tli die ss Pleas at Westminster before c. and recite the entry of the Plu. Capias and the pleas at Westminster c. And recite the entry of the Exigi Fac. At which day the sheriff returned that his county held at Lowth in the county aforesaid the 24. day of Oct. An Regni Eliz. now c. 28. The same Thomas Beverly was the 5. time called and appeared not And that so at the 4. Countys next preceding the same Thomas was likewise called and appeared not and because he appeared not at any of the aforesaid Countyes therefore he is utlawed afterwards to wit on Thursday next after tres Sept. S. Mich. then next following before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster came the same Thomas B in his proper person and rendred himself prisoner to the Marshall of the Marshallsey of the said Lady the Queen before the same Queen by occasion of the utlawly aforesaid who was committed to the Marshall c. Error assigned And presently said that in the record and proceedings aforesaid and also in publishing of the
outlawry aforesaid it was manifestly erred in this that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid were and at the day of purchasing of the originall Writ aforesaid and also from the time wherof the memory of man is not to the contrary there were two Townes one called Humby the great the other Humby the lesser and neither Towne was named or called Humby alone without addition and this he was ready to veryfie whereupon he then prayeth judgment and that the utlawry aforesaid for the said Error and c. others in the Record proceedings aforesaid being might be revoked adnulled taken altogether for nothing And he to the common Law of the Realm of the Lady the Queen of England and also to all things which he had lost by the occasion of the utlawry aforesaid might be restored c. And then the said T. B. prayed a writ of the said Lady the Queen to premonish the said Charles of being before the said Lady the Queen to hear the record and proceedings aforesaid and it was granted him Scire facias c. Whereupon it was commanded the sheriff that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said Charles that he should be before the said Lady the Queen in Oct. S. Marti then next following wheresoever c. to hear the record and proceedings if c. and further c. the same day then given to T. B. c. And hereupon then came W K. of c. Gent. S. T. of the parish c. Gent. I D of London Yoeman and L. R c. and undertook for the same Iohn Beverly to have the body of the same Thomas before the said Lady the Queen at the same Term The plaintiff bayled corpus pro corpore and so from that day untill c. every of the said Manucaptors body for body c. at which said Oct. Martini before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the said Thomas B. in his proper person and the sheriff of the said county of Lincoln then returned there that by vertue of the said writ to him directed by G. S. and R. B. honest c. he had made knowne to the said Charles B. of being before the said Lady the Queene at the day and place in the same Writ contained to hear the record and proceedings aforesaid if c. according to the exigency of that writ which the said C. B. the 4. day of the plea being solemnly called by S. W. his attorney came whereupon the said Thomas as before then said that in the record proceedings aforesaid and also in the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid it was manifestly Erred alledging the Error aforesaid by him in form aforesaid alledged and prayeth that the utlawry aforesaid for that error and others in the record and proceedings aforesaid found might be revoked adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that he to the Common Law of the Realme of the Lady the Queen of England and also to all things that he by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid had lost might be restored and that the said Charles might rejoyne to the said Error And the same C. prayeth licence therein to imparl and it was granted him c. here upon day therein was given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen here untill in 8. S. Hill then next following wheresoever c. to wit the said Charles Baudes of speaking to the said Error and then to rejoyne to that Error at which said Oct. S. Hill before the said Lady the Qu. at Westminster came aswell the said T. B. in his proper person as the same Ch. by his attorney aforesaid And the same C. then said that the utlawry aforesaid ought not to be revoked because he said that within the County of Lincoln aforesaid was and at the same tine of the purchasing of the originall writ aforesaid and also from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary there is one Towne called and known aswell by the name of Humby alone as by the name of Humby the great this he was ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the judgment aforesaid in all things might be confirmed And the said Thomas Beverly as beforesaid That within the said County of Lincolne were and at the same time of purchasing of the originall writ and also for the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary were two Towns the one called H. the great the other called H. the lesser without this that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid was and at the same time of purchasing c. was one Towne called and known by the name of H. only Travers as by the name of H. the great in manner and Form as the said C. B. above in pleading had alleadged and this he was ready to verifie whereupon as before he prayed that the utlawry aforesaid might be revoked adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that he to the common Law of the Realm of the Lady the Queen of England and to all things which he by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid had lost might be restored c. And the same Charles as before said that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid there was and at the same time of purchasing of the originall writ aforesaid was one Towne called and knowne aswell by the name of Hu. only as by the name of Humbly the greater in manner and Forme as the said Charles had above alledged and of this he put himself upon the Country and the said Thomas likewise therefore it was then commanded the sheriff of the said County of Lincoln that he should cause to come before the Lady the Queene in Oct. Pur. 12. of the body of the County of Lincoln by whom c. And recite the Postea who say upon their oath that within the county of Lincoln aforesaid there is not nor at the within written time of purchasing of the said originall writ within writien was there a Towne called and knowne aswell by the name of Humby only as by the name of Humby the great as the same Thomas B. hath within alledged whereby it was then considered in the same Court there that the utlawry aforesaid should be revoked adnulled and altogether taken for nothing and the same Thomas B. to the common Law of this Realm of England and to all things that he by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid had lost should be restored c. And this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said Thomas Beveley may be barred from having execution against him of the judgment aforesaid c. Judgment was given against the Queen quaere T 11. Jac. rot 707. Brownlow ss Otherwise as it appeareth A Scire faciâ—s brought against the principaâ—l and bayl to prosecute an Audita querela where judgment was given for the plaintiff upon Nil capiat pro bre Pas 11.
said Debt and damages aforesaid and because we will that those things which before our Chiefe Justice were rightly acted and known to be duely executed we command you that by honest c you should make knowne to the said A. and W that they be before our justices at Westminster quinq Pas to shew if any thing c. to wit the same A. wherefore the same 160 l. by the same A. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged to be made of his Lands and Chattles and the same W. wherefore the said 80 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be made of his lands and Chattles and to the same Richard ought not to be rendred according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And have you there the names c. And this writ c. Test 14. Aprillis An. c. 22. Entry of a Scire fac in an audita qâ—erela M 21. Jac. rot Brownlow ss Whereas wee were â—nformed by the great complaint of S. A. Clerk that whereas one R. B. lately in the Court to wit in Hillary Terme An. c. 19. before our Justices at Westminster had recovered against the same S. aswell a certaine debt of 12 l. as 40 s. which c. whereof he is convicted And although the same S. in execution of the Debt and Damages aforesaid by vertue of a certain Writ of ours of Capias ad satisfaciendum thereof to our sheriff of Lincolne directed by Edward Hussey Knight and Baronet late sheriff of the same County at the suit of the same Richard was taken and imprisoned and by the same sheriff out of the same prison was permitted to goe at larg whither he would and from the execution aforesaid was delivered As by the same S. by waies and meanes convenient is ready to informe Neverthelesse the same Richard for the debt and Damages aforesaid against the same S. upon the recovery aforesaid hath againe now prosecuted and unjustly hath procured the same S. for that occasion againe to be taken and hitherto to be detayned in our Prison unto the immoderate Damage and grievance of the said S whereupon he hath be sought us to adhibit to him a fit remedy And because we will not that the same S. be injured in this behalfe And being willing to doe what is just we commanded our Justices that hearing the complaint of the same S. in this behalfe and calling before them the parties aforesaid and hearing their reasons therein they cause to be done to the same S. full and speedy justice as of right and according to the Law and custom of our Realm of England ought to be done we command you that by honest c you make knowne to the said Richard that he be here c. retornable Oct. Hill Test 30. Oct. An. 21. c. Scot. 47. H 20. Jac. in Mr. Brownlowes remembrance litera B. ss Entry of a Sci fac after a Sci. fac against Ter-Tenants Whereas wee have lately by our writ we have commanded the sheriffs of London that by honest and Lawfull men of their Bayliwick they should make knowne to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of F. C. late of W. c. otherwise called c. in Fee-simple from the day of S. Martin c. An. 42. Eliz. Regin which day E. G. in the Court of the said late Lady the Queen of the Common Bench at Westminster before E. A. c. by the consideration of the same court had recovered against the said F aswell a certaine debt of 24 l. as 6 l. which to the same Edmond in the same Court were adjudged c. whereof he is convicted or at any time afterwards in their bayliwick that they should be before our Justices at Westminster in Oct. Pur. S. Mariae last past to shew if they had or knew any thing for themselves to say wherefore the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the lands and tenements which were of the said F at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in the seisin of the same Tenants in your Bayliwick ought not to be made and rendred to the said Edmond according to the Forme of the recovery aforesaid if it shall seeme expedient to them and our sheriffs of London to our said Justices at Westminster at that day retorned that there were not any Tenants of any of the lands or Tenements which were of the said Francis at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards who had any thing where or by which they could make knowne to them whereupon it was testified in our said Court on the behalfe of the said Edmond that there are divers Tenants of divers lands and Tenements which were of the said F at the time of the judgment aforesaid given in the County of Suff. to whom the same sheriff may make knowne Good president Therefore it was commanded to the same sheriff of Suff. that by honest and lawfull men of his bayliwick he should make knowne to the Tenants of the Lands and Tenements which were of the said F. R. in Fee-simple at the said 15. S. Martin An. 42. abovesaid that they should be before our Justices at Westminster 15. Pas last past to shew if they had or knew any thing for themselves to say wherefore the debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be made of the Lands and Tenements and rendred to the same E. in Form aforesaid And our said sheriff of Suff. to wit W. H. Esq to our said Justices at Westminster at that day renorned that he by P. K. and L. S. honest and lawfull men of his bayliwick made knowne to certaine F. B. Esq Tenant of the mannor of P. with the appurtenances in W. in the same County of Suff. And to R. L. Gent. Tenant of the rectory of the Church of L. in the County of S. which were of the said F. B. Esq at the time of the judgment aforesaid given of being before our said Justices at Westm at that day to answer in Form aforesaid c. and that there are no other Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said F. B. in his Bayliwick to whom he could make knowne and the same F. B. and R. at the same 15. Pas in our said Court appearing said that the same E. Execution against the said F. B. of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances and against the same Richard of the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances ought not to have because they say that before the writ of Scire sac to the sheriff of Suff. directed to wit such a day and yeare one Thomas B Gent. was Tenant as of his Free Tenement of the mannor of E otherwise E. Court with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said mannor with the appurtenances the same Francis Burnall at the same 15. Martin An. 42. abovesaid which day the judgment aforesaid was given was seised in his
London It was commanded the sheriffs whereas I. N. late of c. lately in the Court of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6 Venire fac to account against Tenant in Elegit and judgment against the Tenant and reliberate awarded before the Justices of the same late King of the Common bench here by the consideration of the same Court recovered against T. D. c. aswell a certaine debt of 400 l. as 6 l. which to the same I. in the same Court of the said late King were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted And the same I. afterwards to wit the 28. day of N. An. Reg. nunc primo comming into the Court of the said Lady the Qu. now before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the bench here to wit P 2 3 P. M â—ry rot 926. or 126. Dyer fol 1. Pl 6. 4 H 8. at Westminster close to be delivered to him c. to hold c. and prayeth a writ thereof to the then sheriff of the said County of War to be directed which was granted to him whereupon the Lady the Queen now by her writ commanded the then sheriff of War that all good c. to hold c. and how far he shall execute that precept he should make appeare to her Justices at Westminster 15. Hillarii and that then he should have there that writ at which said 15. Hillarii R. T. Knight then sheriff of the said County of Warr. to the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Common Bench here to wit at Westminster retorned that he had done execution upon the lands and Tenements which were of the the same T. the same day of the judgment aforesaid thereon given And that a moyety thereof to wit one Parke c. which amounted by the yeare in all issues besides reprizes to 62 l. the 13. day of I. An. abovesaid and delivered them to the said I. N. according to the value and extent aforesaid to hold as his Tenement to him and his assignes untill the 300 l. See the old Tenures fol 123 E according to thi writ of Ven fac for the debt and damages aforesaid be thereof levied and further the said sheriff to the said justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster aforesaid retorned that 105 l. in ready moneys which were of the said T. the same day of the judgment aforesaid therein given he likewise delivered to the same I. to hold to him the goods and Cattle aforesaid as his owne goods and Chattles for the residue of the said 105 l for the Debt and Damages aforesaid And because the King and Queene now by the information of the said T. B. know Suggestion that the Pla. had levied a 100 l. above the debt and damages in cutting downe woods See Fâ— tit Scire Fac. Pl. 101. P. 32. E. 3. that although the said moyety of the said Lands and Tenements of the same T. B. so delivered to the said I. M. did only extend unto 62 l. notwithstanding the said I. N. aswell of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid whose true value doth extend it selfe to a greater value then the extent aforesaid as also of the woods and under-woods growing upon the same moyety by the same I. N. lately cut downe and solde 150 l. above the said 406 l. for the Debt and Damages aforesaid hath now levied whereupon he supplicates the King to be by the King and Queen provided of a fit remedy A Venire fac awarded ad Computandum de Exit deterie bosci And the said King and Queen willing to do what should be just to the said T. in that behalfe commanded the sheriffs of London to cause to come here 15. Pas the said I. N. to account with the same B. of the moneys received aswell out of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid according to the true value of the same from the time of the delivery aforesaid as of the woods and under-woods of late growing upon the said Moyety by the same I. N. cut downe and sold And further to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said moyety delivered before to the said I. N ought not to be delivered to the same T.B. if c. Non inventu returned Testat cap. awarded to the sheriff of Mid. ad compuandum quaere de hoc The parties come by attornies Vic. retorneth a Sup. At which said 15. Pas came the said T. B. by F. M. his attorney And the sheriffs to wit T. and I. now retorned that the said I. is not found c. And hereupon it is testified in the Court of the King and Qu. here that the said I.N. doth hide and run from place to place in the county of Midd. Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of the said County of Midd. that he take the same I. N. if c. and safely c. so that he may have his body here tres Trin. to accout and shew in Form aforesaid c. And now here at the said tres Trin. came aswel the said T. B. by his attorney aforesaid as the said I. N. by F. M. his attorney and the sheriff of Midd. to wit T. and F. now retorned that after the receipt of the said writ of Capias I. N. delivered to the said sheriff a Writ of the Lord the King and the Lady the Queen of Sup. by which Writ the same sheriff as to the taking of the same I. N. could not proceed And hereupon the same T. B. saith that after 15. Hillarii An. Regin 1. Count upon the venire facias aswell of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid whereof the true value did amount to a great summe of money to wit 62 l. by the yeare above the extent aforesaid as also for the wood to wit Registred judiciale fo 14. such a writ against tenant by Elegie of 1200 Oakes and 340. Beech Trees and under-woods to wit C. cart loade of underwood to the value of 200 l. late growing in the said Moyety late cut down and sold by the same I. N. Cl. above the said 206 l. levied thereof for Debt and Damnges aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said I. N. may account with the said T. B. c. and also prayeth delivery of the Tenements aforesaid to the said T. B. to be done c. Nil dic ANd the said I. N. defends the force and wrong when c. And nothing in bar of the action of the said T. B. aforesaid wherefore the said I. of the moneys received of the premisses aforesaid to account with the same T. nor wherefore the said moyety to the same I. N. before delivered ought not to be redelivered to the same T. saith neither sheweth whereby the same B. Iudgment that he should account and
that the moyety should be redelivered remayneth against the said I.N. thereof without defence Therefore it is considered that the said I. N. of the moneys received by the same I. aswell for the issues and profits of the moyetyes aforesaid as of the woods and under-woods aforesaid in the said moyety late growing by the same I. N. cut downe and sold should account with the said T. B. And also that the moyety of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances should be redelivered to the said T. B. And hereupon the same T. B. prayeth a Writ of the Lord the King and of the Lady the Queen de Reliberand to the same T. B. the moyety aforesaid to the said sheriff of Warr. to be directed and it is granted him retornable in Cr. S. Martin c. Entry of a Venire facias direct d by the 〈◊〉 of the common Bench to the keeper of the Pallace of the Lord the King of West who is the warden of the Fleer to retuâ—ne a Iury of attornies of the Common Bench to inquire of all misdemeanours done in the same Court ss It was commanded the Keeper of the Pallace of the Lord the King of Westminster that he should cause to come before the Justices of the Lord the King of his Bench here the 29 day of November that same Term 12 attornies of the Court of the Common Bench here whereof every one of them should have 100 s. in lands Tenements or rent by the yeare at the least by whom the truth of the matter might be the better knowne to inquire upon theire oath of all Felonies Falsehoods rasures and deceits whatsoever in the court of the Lord the King here done or committed c. At which day W. B. Esquire keeper of the pallace aforesaid retorneth here a certaine Paunell with the names of the Jurors c. 16. of whom to wit W. K. c. are elected and sworne to inquire of and upon the premisses whreupon further day is given to them by the Court here to inquire of and upon the premisses here untill Cr. Pur. At which day here came the said Jurors And hereupon for certaine causes the Court here moving further day is given them by the court here to inquire of and upon the premisses untill tres Sept. Pas At which day here came the Jurors aforesaid who say upon their oath that whereas otherwise to wit in the Term of S Hillary An. Rs. nunc 17. before Io. Br. Knight and his associats then Justices of the Lord the King of the Common bench at Westminster one 1. Allen Knight prosecuted a certaine account of debt against Robert Hodgson late of Presentment made by the inquest of the attornies c. Gent upon demand of 20 l. And the same R. in the said Court by R Swinlow his attorney appearing in the defence by him made saith nothing in Bar of preclusion of the action of the said I. A. aforesaid for which it was then considered there that the same I. should recover against the said R. his debt aforesaid and his damages by occasion of the detayning of that debt as it appeareth in the same Term rot 325. and the same R. afterwards for that cause was put into the Hustings of London to be utlawed and for that cause afterwards was utlawed as it doth appeare in Trinity Term An. Rs. nunc 18. rot 260. and afterwards to wit 12. November An Rs. nunc 21 at Westminster in the county of Midd. in the Tresure-house there whereunto the records of the Lord the K. belong to the Common Bench under the custody of Geo. Roll Clearke of the Tresury aforesaid were kept these words or sayings to wit Wassan and Sinhowe by the procurement of the said Ro. Hodgson were rased to the intention to vacat and altogether to make null the utlawry aforesaid and of the same word or saying called Wassand was made warrand and of the same word or saying of the name of the attorney of the said Robert Hodgson called Swinhow the letter H. at the end of the same Writ was cased and abstracted and the letter H. was made the letter B. so that the name of his attorney on the plaint aforesaid by the procurement of the said Ro. Hodgson by reason of the said rasure now is Swinbowe in contempt of the Lord the King but who or whom rased that record the Jurors hithrto are altogether ignorant and hereupon the Jurors aforesaid have further day to inquire of and upon the premisses to wit untill the feast of St Iohn Baptist then next following c. At which day here came the Jury aforesaid and upon this day is further given to the Jury aforesaid to inquire of and upon the premisses here untill 15. Mich. then next following c. Withernam P 44. Eliz. rot 1201. ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of pledges of new after withernam and warding of second deliverance and awarding of a writ ad Deliberan averia capt in Withernam upon an nonsuit beore appearance whereas W. H. bad been summoned to be in the Court of the Lady the Queene here to wit at Westminster to answer I K of a plea wherefore he took a certaine Oxe of the said I. and him unjustly detayned against sureties and pledges c. The same I. afterwards in the same Court of the Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster made default by which it was considered in the same court of the said Lady the Qu. here that the same I and his pledges of prosecuting should be thereof in mercy And that the same W. should goe thereof without day and that he should have retorne of his Oxe aforesaid whereupon it was commanded to the same sheriff 30 H 8 Dier so 41. Pl 4 and fo 59. Pl 14 Pasch 27 Eliz rot 1134 entry of a w it of Capias in withernam in like case H. 19 7 rot 401. like entry P 44 Eliz. rot 1935 inter L and P and others that without delay he should make retorne of the said Oxe to the same W. And should not deliver him at the complaint of the said I. without a Writ of the said Lady the Queen that of the said judgment should make expresse mention And in asmuch c. he should make appare here in Cr. Pur. last past And the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King here at this day retorned that before the comming of the Writ aforesaid the said Oxe was inlarged by the same J. to places altogether to him unknown so that he could not make retorne of the Oxe aforesaid to the said W as by the said Writ to him is was commanded Therefore c. that of the cattle of the same I. to the value of the Oxe aforesaid before taken he should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said W. to hold to him untill the Oxe aforesaid before taken could be retorned And that he should put by Sureties and
further of our more abundant and speciall grace certain knowledge and meer motion and for the laudible service to us and our dear Sister the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England And also for all things to the republique heretofore in the Administration of justice performed for us our heires and successors we give and grant to you the said George K. one Annuity or annuall Rent of a hundred pounds of lawfull monie of England yearly to you the said George Kingesmill and your Assignes for and during the naturall life of you the said George Kingesmill to be paid at the receit of our Exchequer our Heirs and Successors by the hands of our Treasurer and Chamberlain and of our Heirs and Successors for the time being out of our Treasury in the hands of our Heirs or Successors from time to time hapning to be at the four Feasts c. by equall portions yearly to be paid during the naturall life of you the said George K. Wherefore we will and by these Presents firmly enjoyning we command as well to our T. C C. and Barons of our Exchequer our Heirs and Successors for the time being as to all and singular other our Officers and Ministers and all our Heirs and Successors whatsoever for the time being to whom it shall belong in this behalf that they and every of them upon the sole demonstration of these our Letters Patents or the Inrolement of them without any Writ or Warrant from us our Heirs or Successors to be prosecuted or obtained the said Annuity of a hundred pounds by the year to the said E. K. and his Assignes they should pay and deliver in form as abovesaid or should cause to be paid and delivered And that these our Letters Pattents or the Inrolement of them shall be as well to the said Treasurer C â— and Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid and of our Heirs and Assignes As to all and singular other our Officers and Ministers our Heirs and Successors whatsoever for the time being to whom in this behalf it shall belong a sufficient Warrant in this behalf for that no expresse mention of the true yearly value or of the certainty of the Premisses or of any of them or of any other Gift or Grants by us or any of our Progenitors to the said George Kingesmell before these times made in these Presents be not made or any Statute or Ordinance Provision Proclamation or Restriction to the contrary thereof before now be had made done ordained or provided or any other thing cause or matter whatsoever in any thing notwithstanding in Testimony c. Amercement The Sheriff amerced for making of an insufficient return upon a Writ in wast M. 19. H. 8. Rot. 260. At which day here came the said Elizabeth by her Attorney aforesaid whereupon the Premisses being seen and by the Justices here sully understood It seemeth to the Justices here that the return of the Writ aforesaid is insufficient in Law for that in the same return no mention is made that the said Sheriff in his proper person came to the places aforesaid wasted Therefore the same Sheriff to wit H. A. Esquire in mercy And he is fined by the Justices here at twenty shillings And as before let another Writ be made thereof to the said Sheriff in form aforesaid returnable here in 8. S. Trinitatis c. The Sheriff is amerced for not returning of a Capias utlagat E. 12. Iac. Rot. 2243. ss Edw. R. Esquire Sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he returned not here into the Court a certain Writ of Capias utlagat against P. P. at the Suit of T. T. in a plea of Debt returnable before the Justices of the said Lord the King here 1. die c. that same term in mercy and is fined by the Justices here at ten pounds The Sheriff amerced for not returning of a Cap. sat after severall daies given him by the Court. ss I. P. Esquire for that that at severall daies to him given by the Court here he returned not the Writ of the Lord the King of Capias ad satisfaciendum for forty pounds for debt and sixty pounds for damages to the same Sheriff directed to satisfie M.T. Knight Plaintiff against E. D. of c. Gent. returnable here Mense Mich. that same term in mercy And is fined by the Justices here at a hundred and three pounds six shillings eight pence c. The Marshall of â—he Court of Common Bâ—nch foâ— that he attended not up on the Iudge upon the Ess in day is fined twenty pounds M. 10. Eliz. Kot primo Whoteley ss It is considered by the Court for that that Andrew Billesly Marshall of the Court aforesaid kept not the day of Essoynes here in Court S. Trinitatis that same term nor attended upon Humphrey Brown Knight oâ—â— of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here then at that day being for the receiving of the four Essoynes of the same Cro. S. Trinitatis And also further because those things which appertained to his Office of Marshall in that behalf were not done Therefore the same Andrew in mercy and is fined by the Justices at twenty pounds Appearance LOndon ss It was commanded the Sheriffs Entry of an appearance upon an attachment of priviledge in discharge of an Obligation made to the Sheriff for his appearance and baile in Court to the Action T. 3. Car. Reg. rot 2002. H. 19. Jac. rot 1. c. Brownlow the like E. t y of the appearance that they should attach T. F. so that they might have him here at this day to wit upon Saturday next after the morrow of the holy Trinity to answer I. C. one of the Attorneys of the Court of Common Bench of the Lady the Queen here according to the liberties and priviledges of the same Court for such Attorneys and other Ministers of the same Bench from the time whereof no memory is extant used and approved in the same in a plea of Trespasse And the Sheriff now returneth that he is attached And now here at this day came the said T. in his proper person and saith that he and divers other persons of his friends at his request who are bound by their writing obligatory to the said Sheriffs of London in a great summ of monie that he should personally appear here this day to answer to the said I. in the plea aforesaid And as well for his indempnity as for his security aforesaid prayeth that his appearance by the Justices here at this day may be recorded c. whereupon the appearance of the said T. at this day is recorded c. And hereupon came here into the Court certain N. F. of c. and W. S. of c. and undertook and both of them undertook in the summ of a hundred pounds for the same T. and the same T. being likewise present in Court in his proper person Entry of the Recoâ—nizance upon the
said I. H. whom c. to answer the said John Martin in the said plea c. T. 13. Jac. Rot. 3627. c. Brownlow the like is entred upon an Attachment of Priviledge for a Judges Clerk of the Common Bench with an Amerciament and awarding of an Hab. Corp. M. 10. Jac Rot. 1920. Norf Amerciament of a Bayly of a liberty upon a Cepi corpus returned and a Distringas awarded upon an attachment of priviledge M 19. Jac. rot 1948. M. 21. H. 8. rot 529 11 H. 4. fol. 43. pl. 12 ss It was commanded the Sheriff that he should attach I.G. so that he should have him here at this day to wit upon Fryday next after Mens pas to answer H.S. Gent. one of the Attorneys c. as in others in a plea of debt And now here at this day came the said Henry in his own person and he came not And the Sheriff to wit T.C. Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed commanded Hen Hobart Knight and Baronet Attorney-generall of the Lord the King and Bayliff of the liberty of the said Lord the King of his Dutchy of Lanc. in the County aforesaid who hath the fall execution of all Writs within the liberty aforesaid and the returns of them within which execution of that Writ wholly vesteth to be made for that no other execution in any other place out of the said liberty can be made by the Sheriff which said Bayliff answered to the said Sheriff that he had taken the body of the said I. whose body he had ready before the Justices here at this day And because the said Bayliff hath not the body of the said I. ready here at this day Therefore the said Bayliff in mercy And is fined by the Justices here at forty shillings Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that be distrain the said Bayliff by all his lands c. and of the Issues c. so that he have here upon Fryday next after Cr. Trin. the body of the said I. whom c. to answer to the said H in the plea aforesaid c. See Trin 14. Jac Rot 2151. c. Brownlow a Distringas awarded after a Cepi Corpus returned by the Sheriff upon a Mand. Bal. against the chief Steward of the liberty of Bury Duces tecum awarded the Sheriffretu ned a Languidus in prisona upon an attachment for contempt M. 2. Car. Reg. Rot. 843. c. Brownlow War ss It is commanded the Sheriff as at another time it had been commanded to the said Sheriff that he should attach I.B. of c. if c. and safely c. so that he should have his body here at this day to wit upon Satturday next after fifteen Trin. to answer to the said Lord the King now of such things as at that day should be here objected against him And further to do and receive what the Court of the said Lord the King here should consider of him in this behalf And now here at this day came here into Court Robert Heath Knight Attorney-generall of the Lord the King now who for the same Lord the King in this behalf followeth And the same John being solemnly called came not And the Sheriff to wit Io. N. Esquire now returneth that by vertue of the said Writ to him directed he took the body of the said I. B. whose said body was so languishing in the Prison of the Lord the King in the County of War and held with divers infirmities so that he could not have his body ready here at this day as by the said Writ to him it was commanded c. And hereupon in the said Court of the Lord the King here on the behalf of the said Lord the King it was testified that the said Iohn is whole and sound and able to labour Therefore it is commanded to the said Sheriff that he or his under Sheriff be here upon Thursday next after Cr. Martini bring here with him the said Jo. whether he be unsound or infirm Sâ—e the old book of Entries fol. 41. title Annuity in proces 7. See T. 2. Car. Reg rot 2681. c. Gulston Vpon an appearance to an attachment upon contempt and thereupon examined submits himself to a fine to answer the said Lord the King now of and upon the premisses aforesaid in form aforesaid And this he by no means omit under the penalty of ten pounds which the Sheriff shall know himself to loose if he shall not do it H. 10. Eliz. Rot. 549. Buk ss It was commanded the Sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of the County aforesaid but that he should attach J. R so that he should have his body here at this day to wit upon Thursday next after Cr. Pas that same term to answer to the Lady the Queen of and upon such things which then here on the behalf of the Lady the Queen should be objected And now here at this day that same Tearm came the said J. in his proper person by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed brought here to the Bar whereupon the Court here is given to understand that the same J.R. present here in Court that same Term in the face of the same Court behaved and carried himself evilly and unjustly in giving evidence to twelve Jurors of the same County of Buk to try a certain Issue of the Country between certain G.G. and A. his wise Plaintiffs and certain W.H. late of and J.L. late of c. in a plea of Trespasse in the same Court here joyned And prayeth that the same J. R. may be fined to the said Lady the Queen for that occasion whereupon the same J.R. being asked by the Justices here if he had or knew any thing to say for himself wherefore he ought not to be admitted to make a Fine with the Lady the Queen therein who saith that he will put himself upon the favour of the Court to do what the same Justices here should consider of him in that behalf And hereupon the same I. R. is admitted to make his Fine with the Lady the Queen by the occasion of the premisses at forty shillings to be paid here in Court into the hands of R.L. one of the Prothonotaries of the Court of the Lady the Queen here for divers Statute-books in the Treasury-house of this Court remaining bought Therefore the same I. go thereof without day c. Ballivo amovendo P 10 H. 6 Rot. 324. Be it remembred that Thomas May Entry of a Writ De ballivo amovend to remove a Bayliff for continuing in office above one year togeher against the form of the statute the third day of June that same Tearm delivered here to J.H. under Sheriff of Kent two Writs of the Lord the King closed directed to the Sheriff of Kent in form of Law to be executed which said Writs the same Sheriffs here in Court opened whose Tenors severally
the same S to amend the said writ in the test and retorne of the same which said Sebastian rased the said writ in the test and retorne of the same And put in the said writ le test 11. die Julii and retorne of the same writ A. die S. Mich. in tres Septim And immediatly after the amendment of the said writ so made the same I F delivered to the said W. Y. that writ so rased and amended but not new sealed and the same I F being asked by the Court here wherefore he caused not that writ to be new sealed said that he knew not whether that said writ ought to be new sealed or not And further the said I. F. said that by vertue of the said writ the same H. M. then being under-Sheriff of the said county of Midd. at the request of the said I. F. in the name of the said executors made made a certaine warrant to take the same T. T. for the debt and damages aforesaid And that the said T. T. by vertue of that warrant was taken in the said County of Midd. and afterwards brought to the dwelling house of L. D. scituate in London there one of the Sheriffs of the same County of Midd. And also the said Sebastian having taken his corporall oath was likewise by the Court here conferred with and examined whether he rased and altered les Testes and retorns of the said writ as aforesaid at the request of the said I. H or not or whether he made any continuance of the same writ in any record or rolle of plea thereof in the same court here remaining or not said that he at the request of the said I. Clerk of the said R. L. his Master rased and altered the said writ in the les Test and retorne of the same as is aforesaid And that he made not any continuance thereof any record or Roll in the Court here here of remaining whereof the roll of the entries of Pleas of Hillary term last past in which term judgment to have execution for the debt and damages aforesaid was entred being brought here into the Court it evidently appeareth and the Court here by the inspection of the said Justices in the roll of Pleas number 941. the said writ had day of continuance from the said tribus Septi S. Trinitatis untill the said tres Septi S. Michi then next following And being by the court there asked who made that continuance und when the same continuance was made it is given to the Court here furrher to understand that one H. S. one of the Clerks of the said R. L. had made it which said I. S present here in court after he had taken his oath being conferred with and by the court here fully thereupon examined said that he the first day of that Terme of S. Michael at the request of the said I made the continuance for that he is one of the Clerks of the said K. L. attending in the Office and entred the Plea thereof in the same Roll 940. And the same W Y. being likewise present here in court and having likewise taken his oath by the same court being examined of and upon the premisses said that he in the beginning of the Term of the holy Trinity last past received by the hands of the said I. H. the writ aforesaid then sealed and long after the end of the terme of the holy Trinity the same I F came to him desiring him the same W to make a certaine warrant upon the same writ to takâ— the same T. T. to which said I. F the said W then said that the day of the return of the said writ was then past And further the said I. H. that he should cause any of the Clerks of the said K. L. to amend the test and the retorne of the said Writ And that the same W. afterwards received from the said I. H. the writ aforesaid in Form aforesaid rased and amended but not new sealed And that the same T. T. by vertue of that writ and by vertue of a certaine warrant upon the said writ as aforesaid made was taken and arrested And further the said W. said that the next day betimes in the morning to wit about 4. a clock before noone of the same day by the command of Humphry Moseley his Master came to the house of W. Forrest scituate in Fleetstreet London in whose custody the seale of the Lady the Queen deputed to seal Writs in the Bench aforesaid remained and caused the said Writ to be so sealed Fee for the common Seale in the Bench seven pence and paid for the sealing of the said Writ seven pence to the said W. F. And afterwards to wit the same day the said W. Y. that writ so newly rased and then newly sealed delivered to the said H.M. his Master which said H.M. being likewise present here in Court having taken his oath and by the same Court here being examined of and upon the premisses said that he at the time of the taking and arresting of the said T.T. knew no otherwise but that the writ so rased Commitment of the offendors to the Fleet. was sealed of new but as soon as the same H had understood that the same writ after the alteration of the same was not sealed of new said to the said W.Y. his Clerk that he should cause the same writ to be sealed And thereupon the same W. Y. caused the same VVrit to be sealed the same H further said that hee having the writ aforesaid sealed of new at W in the County of M that Writ to the same T. T. then and there being under the custody of the same H shewed and read it The plaintiffs examined in ihe Court whether they were consenting to the alteration or not The Plaintiffs pray that the Defendant may ce committed in Execution by force of the Writ or of the record of the Judgement in Court if it may be by the Law af the Land and the same T. by vertue of that writ to one P. delivered to be safely kept in the prison of the said Lady the Queen for the debt and damages aforesaid and hereupon the same I F S T and W Y present here in Court by occasion of the premisses are committed to the prison of the said Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to abide untill c. Afterwards to wit the third day of November then next following the said then Sheriff of Middlesex came here to the bar and brought the Writ aforesaid together with the body of the same T T under the custody of the said Sheriff being by vertue of the Writ aforesaid detained and the same Sheriff prayeth that the Writ aforesaid here in Court may be filed c. and that he from the custody of the same T T may be discharged c. whereupon the same Executors the same third day of November by the command of the Justices being present here in
Court having taken their oath were examined by the said Court here whether they were conscious or consenting to the rasure and alteration of the said Writ and to the taking and arrest aforesaid who sayd that not and the same Executors being conferred with by the Court here that they would have done against the said T T in this behalf or require who say that if the said T T by vertue of the Writ aforesaid here shewed in Court or by vertue of the judgment aforesaid against the same T here remaining upon record and to the Justices here in Court shewed The Justices will advise ought to remain in execution for the debt and damages aforesaid by the Law of the Land then the same Executors prayeth Execution against the same T T and that he may be committed to the prison of the Fleet for the said debt and damages and hereupon it is said to the said Executors by the Justices here that the same Justices wil advise themselves at another day therein for that not as yet c. And aftrwards to wit the fourteenth day of November then next following all which premisses aforesaid with their circumstances The writ is received and filed and the Defendant at the prayer of the plain iffs is committed in execution The Delinquents come to the Barr and pray to be discharged and are discharged One makes a fine before he be discharged Admitted to his fine at a hundred shillings by pledges The Sheriffs are fined at ten l. The Prothonotary of the Bench payes the fine by him received of the party for a misdemeanour to the barons of the Exchequer by the commandement of the Justices of the Bench. by the same Justices here being fully examined seen and understood upon great diligent advisement and consultation by the Court here in that behalf before had the Writ aforesaid by the Court here is received and filed and the same T T at the petition of the said Executors for the debt and damaâ—es aforesaid by the same Court here is committed to the prison aforesaid there to remain untill c. And afterwards to wit the sixteenth day of November then next following came the same I F. S T and W Y in their proper persons brought here to the barr by the Keeper of the prison aforesaid and pray that they may be delivered from the prison aforesaid c. Whereupon the same S. F. and W. by the Court here by occasion of the premisses out of the prison aforesaid are discharged and set at liberty and it is said to the Court here that the same I F that he should make a Fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the premisses before he should be delivered out of the prison aforesaid and hereupon the same I prayeth to be admitted to make a fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the premisses and is admitted at a hundred shillings by pledge therefore the same I go therein quiet c. And that he should be delivered and discharged from prison to go at large c. And afterwards to wit the same sixteenth day of November came here into Court the said W. and E. I. late Sheriff of the County of Middlesex in their proper persons and pray themselves to be admitted to make a fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the premisses and are admitted for ten pounds paid into the Court here by the hands of the said H. M. late under-sheriff of the said late Sheriff to the said R. L. to the use of the said Lady the Queen which said ten pounds the same R. L. the eight and twentieth day of November then next following by the command of the Justices aforesaid before the Barons of the said Lady the Queen of her Exchequer in full Court there brought and by the command of the same Barons paid it to one I. H. to the use of the said Lady the Queen therefore as well the said I. D. as the same E. I. and the said Humphry M. as the said Richard Love of the said ten pounds are quiet c. Entry of a Habeas corpus and commitment of a prisoner to the Fleet in execution in the Terme time at the cheif Iustice his chamber the writ bore teste 4 July 1â— Jac. And note that the Term ended 5 July 18 Jac. and the party was committed to the Fleet in the Term from the Judges Chamber in Serjeants Inn in the afternoon and the Iudge delivered the Commitment to be inrolled the next day being the last day of the term T 18 Jac rot 3060 Brownlow London ss It was commanded the Sheriffs of London that they should have the body of Leonard Bawtry Serjeant at Law by whatsoever name reputed in the prison of the Lord the King under the custody of the same Sheriffs together with the day and cause of his taking and detaining before H H Knight and Baronet cheif Justice of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench at his chamber scituate in Serjeants Inn in F street L T. 17. Jac. rot 3094. 3279. 3270. 2871. 2000. 2170 T 24 Eliz. rot 2142. the like immediatly after the receiving of this Writ that the same Cheif Justice seeing the cause aforesaid may do in that behalfe what of right according to the Law and Custome of the Realm of the Lord the King of England and the liberties and priviedges thereof ought to be done and that they should have then there that Writ afterwards to wit the fifth day of July Anno Reg. c. 18. immediatly after the receiving of the said Writ before the same cheif Justice at his chamber aforesaid came the same Leonard in his proper person under the custody of R. D. and I. C. Sheriffs of the City aforesaid and the same Sheriffs to the said cheife Justice then and there returned that the execution of the said Writ did appear in a certain Schedule annexed to the said Writ the Tenor of which said Schedule followeth in these words London ss We R.D. and I. C Sheriffs of the City of London do certifie to H. H. Knight and Baronet Cheif Justce c. that before the comming of the said Writ annexed to the Schedule to wit Return of the causes by the Sheriffs the fourth day of July Anno c. 18. Leornard B. Serjeant at Law in the same writ named was taken in the City aforesaid and kept in the prison of the said Lord the King under the custody of us the said Sheriffs by virtue of a Writ of the said Lord the King directed the Tenor whereof followeth in these words James c. To the Sheriffs of London greeting Attach Leonard B. one of the Serjeants at Law otherwise called L. B. of Boston in the County of Lincolne Serjeant at Law otherwise called L. B. De Boston in Com. Lincoln ob ad legem so that you may have him before our Iustices at Westminster on wednesday next
the same Edw. Osbalston or any other person for the same R. M. W. M. and I. M. upon the utlawry aforesaid was ever prosecuted as by due Search in this behalfe made to the Court here plainly appeareth Notwithstanding the same Edward Osbalstone the said false and forged writ afterwards with the seale to seale writs in the court here caused to be sealed And the same to the said sheriff of Surry to wit to Richard Brown Esq as a true writ delivered by colour or which said false and forged writ the same sheriff delivered the same Io. Michell out of prison aforesaid to the great scandall of the Lawes of the Lady the Queen now and the deceit of the said Queene and of the Court here and great delay of the said Io. Vernon and Richard Carter in their suit aforesaid whereupon the said Ed. O. being present here in Court and by the court here examined whether he made the said false writ in Forme aforsaid or not saith that he cannot gainesay but that he made the said false writ in form as aforesaid as is above alleaged hereupon the same Edward O. is committed to the Prison of the said Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to stay untill c. and afterwareds to wit the 30. day of Jan. that same Terme came there in Court the same Ed. O. in his proper person under the custody of the Warden of the prison of the Fleet brought and being asked how he would excuse himselfe of the premisses saith that he cannot gainsay but that he is guilty of the premisses aforesaid as it is above alleaged against him and therein puts himselfe upon the favour of the Court here whereupon for that it seemeth to the Court here that the said Ed. Osbalston the said false Writ not only out of negligence but out of malice voluntary fraud and falsehood caused to be written and made therefore it is considered that the same Edw. in his Office of attorney in the Court here from henceforth shall not intermedle but shall loose all his Priviledges therein that his name shall presenty be taken quite from the attornies and that he from the Court here before judged and put out of the Barr of the Court Roll here and that hee make a Fine with the Lady the Queen for his falsehood aforesaid at C. and also that afterwards the same Edward after he is put out of the bar here shall be led by the warden of the Fleet through the hall here into the Court of the said Lady the Queen to hold Pleas before the said Lady the Queen commonly called the Kings Bench that the Justices of the said Lady the Queen there having notice of the falshood of the said Edward before by the command of the Court here might command the same Edward in as much as the same Edward c. in nullo sed intromittas And immediatly is brought back from the same Court through the hall there by the same Warden of the Fleet into the Exchequer of the said Lady the Queen before the Barons there that the same Barons likewise taking notice of his falshood c in that Court T 20 H 6. f 37 Pl. 6. br attorny 70. in nullo se intromittat c. And further the same Edward by the command of the Justces here took his Corporall oath in these words This heare you Justices that I. E. Osbaston late one of the Attornies of this Court having my name by you for divers my misdemeanours by me committed in the exercise of my said Office justly drawne out of the Roll of Attornies And forejudged this Court from the exercise of the same Office shall not from henceforth directly or indirectly as an attorney pursue defend or otherwise intromit in any action suit or Canse in this court here or in any other of the Queens Majesties Courts at Westminster so help me God and the contents of this book whereupon the same Edw. to the terror and example of others in the like case offending by the cryers of the same Court was put out of the Court here beyond the Barr c. P 7. H. 7 Rot. 1. 34. In the Kings Bench Angl. ss Forindger of a Philizer of the Kings beâ—â—h no aâ—tending his Office in person Be it remembred that it seemeth to the Court of the Kings here before the same King and it is plainly knowne to the same Court that Phillip Wharton otherwise called Philipp Wharton who is possessed of an Office of the Filizer of writs of the same Court of the Countyes of Cornwell Glos hereof the towne of Glou. and the towne of Bristoll and for 6. yeares and more last past was possessed that Office within the space of two yeares and divers Terms before hath not personally occupyed as he of right and according to the custome of the Court aforesaid ought and for that the same Philip in the Terme and Yeares aforesaid was not vexed with any such disease or infirmity but that he might fitly in person attend the Office And the same Court of the Lord the King here by diligent examination in that behalfe had manifestly appeareth And also for that the same Philip was often times admonished by the said Court of the said Lord the King according to the custome of the said Court personally to attend that office and never offered himself nor offers to exercise and occupy the same office but himselfe from personall exercising of that office by a long time now elapsed being in no wise licensed hath absented himselfe Therefore by the advice of the whole Court of the Lord the King aforesaid the same Phillip divers daies and times in the same Terme and other Termes past being solemnly called according to the custome of that Court personally to exercise and occupey that office appeared not that the said office for default of the said P. remaineth in nothing executed observed for which it is considered in the same Court that the same Philip from the said Office and from further exercising and occupying of the same from henceforth forever be forejudged which said default upon him by the Court here at the end of the same Term to wit the fourth day of the Plea de 15. S. Ioh. Bapt. which said fourth day that Court untill the 8. S. Mich. next following is adjorned is Recorded c. see in the title Commitment an ordinance made 35. Hen. 6. Fine quashed upon the examination and inspection of the Infant by him acknowledged upon dedimus potestatem which was not admitted to be recorded P 4. Ia. Rot. 1409. Brownlow Derb. ss Be it remembred that the 29. day of May that same Terme it seemed to the Court here aswel by the inspection and veiw of the body of J. Zouch the younger Esq then present here in Court in his proper person as by the examination of divers faithfull witnesses then and there examined upon their oath and other lawfull Proofes in that behalfe in
three aâ—e s given him to do it T 2 Car. Regis Rot. 841. Brownlow Berks. ss John B. Sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he in Easter Terme last past at the severall dayes that same Terme by the Court of the Lord the King here to him given as in the bill of pleas this Terme it doth appear hath not returned to the Court here a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Habeas Corpus issuing on of the Court here and to the same Sheriff directed and delivered to be executed in form of Law against one I W Esquire at the suit of R. B. Esquire in a plea of Debt of two hundred pounds returnable before the Iustices here Quinque pas last past in mercy c. And he is fined by the said Justices here for the said four defaults at twenty five pounds c. H 43. Eliz. Rot 451. Prisoner in the Fleet brought to the barr by Hab corp at the petition of an estranger a who brought Writ in debt against him and he is demanded by the Justices that he would appeare to the said writ who said he wâ—n duâ—â— therefore processe of Ouâ— lawâ—y is awarded against him ss It was commanded to the Warden of the prison of the Fleet that he should have here at this day to wit upon Satturday next after Octob. S. Hillar the body of W. A. Esquire in the prison of the said Lady the Queen under the custody of the said Warden detained to do and receive what the Court of the Queen here shall consider of him and now here at this day came here into the Court H. T. by A.S. his Attorney and brought here into Court a certain Originall Writ in Debt upon demand of an hundred and twenty pounds directed to the Sheriffs of London and before the Justices of the Lady the Queen here returnable against the said Walter by the name of W A. Esquire of Tomby in the County of Lincolne Esquire and prayeth that the said Walter may appeare to his sayd Writ whereupon by the same Warden of the Prison aforesayd brought here to the bar present in Court in his own proper person being spoken to saith that hee will not appear to the Writ Therefore let processe be made against the sayd Walter upon the Originall Writ aforesaid c. T 25 El. rot 860. G against I.C. like Hab. corp and such an Originall and demand who saith that he is not the same person against whom the said G. brought the said originall writ and that he wil not appear c. Therefore let further processe be made against the said I. C. late of L Gentleman against whom the sayd Originall VVrit was brought upon the said Originall and the sayd I.C. who is now brought to the Barr is sent back to the prison under the custody of the Warden for the occasion that he is therein detained there to remain c. H 13 Jacorot 588. Entry of a Capias ad respodend and thereupon a Non inventus returned and a Habeas Corpus to the Warden of the Fleet is awarded received such a day and then thus and now here at this day came the said Defendant in his proper person under the custody of the Warden aforesaid brought to the Barr who being demanded if he would appear to the said Writ or not sayd that not Therefore let processe of Outlawry be made c. M 5. Jac. rot 2254. Fleet ss Entry of an Habeas corpus of a prisoner committed to be Fleet by the Commissioners in causes Ecclesiasticall and his enlargement without baile It was commanded to the Warden that he should have here to wit at Westminster immediatly after the receit of this Writ the body of Anthony Rooper Knight in the prison aforesayd under his custody detained by whatsoever name he is reputed together with the day and cause of taking and detaining of the said Anthony that the same Justices here viewing the cause may cause to be done what of right and according to the Law and custome of the Realme of the Lord the King of England The like for Langton P. 8. Jac. rot 819. The lik for Melton there rot 1939. The like for Throckmorton T. 8. Jac. rot 1675. But they entred into a Recognizance of a 100 l. iâ— the Bench to appear from day to day P. 9. Jac rot 1510 P 8. Jac. rot 1939. ought to be done And no where at this day to wit on Satturday next after Octab. Martini that same term came the same A in his proper person under the Custody of the same Warden brought here to the Bar and the same Warden then returned that before the coming of the Writ to wit the ninth day of October last past the sayd A.R.M. rendred themselves to the prison aforesaid before committed by vertue of a certaine Warrant dated the thirtieth day of I last past which followeth in these words These are in his Majesties name straightly to charge you by vertue of his Highnesse Commission for causes Ecclesiasticall under the great Seal of England to us and others directed That herewith you receive and take into your custody the body of Sir Anthony Rooper Knight and him safely detaine prisoner at this our Commandement untill we shall give you order for his enlargement signifying unto you That the cause of his commitment is for that there being a certain cause referred unto us by his Majesties especiall direction betwixt him the said Sir A.R. and I.B. Vicar of B. for that he detaineth wrongfully from the said Vicar a certain yearly pension due unto him from the said Sir A. R being called before us after ful hearing of the cause in the presence of the said Sir A. R. and of his Councill three or four severall times and at last adjudged by us to pay the said pension he having some time of deliberation given unto him by us to consider therof hath notwithstanding obstinately disobey our said Order and doth so still persist and this shall be your Warrant in that behalfe given at Lambeth this thirtieth day of Iune 1607. And that this was the cause of taking and detaining of the said Anthony in the prison aforesaid the body notwithstanding of the said A he hath now here ready as by the said Writ it was commanded him c. whereupon the premisses being seene and by the Justices here fully examined and understood Judgment by the Court. it seemeth to the said Justices here that the said cause of Commitment of the sayd A. to the prison of the Fleet aforesaid in the Returne aforesaid above specâ—fied to be insufficient in Law to detain him the said A in the prison aforesaid or to deprive the said A from his priviledge of the Court of the Lord the King here therefore the same Anthony is dismissed from the prison aforesaid by the Court here and the same Warden is fully discharged by the Court here of such custody c. T 18 Iac.
they came not being solemnly called but made Default whereupon the default of the said R B T. W. and P. A. by the said Iustices of the Bench here being recorded because the Court of the Lord the King cannot proceed in the plaint aforesaid in this behalfe therefore the plaint is remitted to the Iustices of the Lord the King Cestr or keeper of his place there to proceed in the plaint aforesaid as of right and according to the Law and custome of the county of Chester is to be done And it is said to the said R. I. Attorny of the said T. T. that the same T. be before the Iustices of the Lord the King Cestr or Keeper of his place there at the next County to wit upon Thursday in S. septimana quadragessimae next coming there to be held to prosecute there his plea aforesaid if c. Secunda Deliberatio H 15. Eliz. Rot. 708. Entry of a wâ—it of second deliverance after cattell were taken in Wirhernam and the defendants attorney was compelled to gage deliverance of the cattell taken in Withernam Som ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas T P. Esq was summoned to be here in the court of the Lady the Queen here to answer P. B. of a plea wherefore he took the cattle of the said Peter and them unjustly detayned against Sureties and privileges c. the same Peter afterwards in our said court here made default for which it was considered here that he and his pledges to prosecut should be in mercy c. and that the said Thomas should goe thereof without day and should have retorne of his Cattle aforesaid For which it was comanded to the said sheriff that he shall make retorn of the cattle aforesaid to the said Thomas and should not deliver them at the complaint of the said Peter without a writ of the Lady the Queen that shall make expresse mention of that judgement and in as much c. the said sheriff make appear here in 8. S. Michaelis last past c. At which day the sheriff then returned That before the coming of the writ aforesaid the Cattell were cloyned to places to him unknowne by the same Peter so that he could not return them to the said Thomas as by the said writ it was commanded him whereupon it was commanded the said Sheriff that of the cattell of the said Peter to the value of the cattell aforesaid before taken in Withernam he should take and deliver them to the said Thomas to hold to him untill he could returne the cattell aforesaid before taken and that he put by sureties and safe pledges the said Peter that he be here in Oct. Hill then next following to answer as well to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt c. as to the said Thomas for damages and injuries to him in this behalfe done At which day here came aswell the said T by I. W. his Attorney as the said Peter in his proper person and the Sheriff now returneth here that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed took in Withernam of the cattel of the said Peter one Mare and one colt to the value of the cattell of the said Peter before taken and those cattell delivered to the sayd Thomas P. to be kept untill the cattell of the said Peter before taken may be returned to the sayd T. P. as by the said writ to him it was commanded A writ of second deliveronce granted after a withernam Defendant praies that the plaintiff may finde pledges as well to prosecute as for his second deliverance and that he put the same Peter by pledges I D and R R. and hereupon the same Peter prayeth to be admitted to make a fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the contempt aforesaid and is admitted for three shillings and four pence which the same P in the Court of the Queen here by the command of the Iustices here payd to Tho. Foster Clark of the Essoines of the Court here for diverse reparations by him here in Court to be made And afterwards to wit at the said 8 Sancti Hillarii came here into the Court the said Peter by W. B. his Attorney and by the statute c. prayeth a writ of the Lady the Queen De Secunda deliberatione and it is granted to him returnable here 15. Pas c. At which day here came as well the said Peter as the said Thomas by their Attornyes aforesaid whereupon the said Thomas prayeth that the said Peter may finde pledges as well to prosecute his complaint as to return the cattell first taken Pledges given if return of them should be adjudged for that that the Sheriff of the County aforesaid hath not received sufficient pledges of the said P upon the said writ of second deliverance hereupon the said P. here in Court found pledges as well to prosecute his complaint as to return the cattell aforesaid before taken The Plaintiff prayes that the Defendants Attorney may gage deliverance of the Cattell taken in Withernam if c. To wit the said VV B of S. in the County of Dorset Gent. and VV B. of c. And hereupon the said Peter prayeth that the said I. VV. Attorny for the said T. P. may gage deliverance of the cattell aforesaid taken in VVithernam and because the Iustices will advise of and upon the premisses of making deliverance day is given to the parties aforesaid here A die pas in 15 dies of heareing their judgement therein because the Iustices here not as yet c. At which day here came as well the same P. as the same T. by their Attornye aforesaid and because the Iustices c. untill Cro. Trin. At which day here came aswell the said P as the said Tho. by their attornies aforesaid whereupon the premisses being seen and by the justices here fully understood The Court will advise it seemed to the same Justices here that the said I W. attorney of the said T. P gage to the P. deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid taken in Withernam Judgment that the Defendants Attorney gage deliverance for the Cattell raken in Withernam And whereupon the said I. gageth deliverance of the chattles taken in Withernam and assumed upon himselfe for the said Thomas that the said Thomas should make deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam to the same Peter about the Feast of S. Peter next following at C. in the county of Som. at the common pound there under the panalty of 20 l which said 20 l. the said I. W. acknowledgeth to be made of his lands and Chattles to be levyed to the use of the said P The Attorney gives secuâ—ity in Court for his Client to deliver the Cattell aboue such a day 25. E 3. Gager 25 6 E 4. 8. 1 H 7. 11. 15 E 3. Gager 4. accord that the attorney may gage if the Defendant appear
the goods and chattells of the same T. at the time of his death being in the hands of the said A to be administred to be made and ought not to be rendred to the same E. according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came aswell the same E. by A his Attorney as the same A by D D her Attorney and the Sheriff now returneth that she hath nothing c. nor is found c. And hereupon the same E prayeth Execution against the same A for the said one hundred and fifty pounds in Forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the same T at the time of his Death in the hands of the same A Being to be administred to be adjudged him c. And the said Ann saith That the said E. ought not to have Execution against her for the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T. M. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the same T. at the time of his Death in the hands of the said A to be administred because the saith That after the Recognizance aforesaid by the same T. M. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and before the same Terme of Saint Hlllary Anno 42 of Queen Eliz. abovesaid to wit the tenth day of December Anno 42 Eliz. c. abovesaid in the Court of the said late Queen held at the City of London beâ—ore R. C. Alderman then one of the Sheriffs of the City aforesaid in his Counter scituate in the parish of Siant Michael in Woodstreet London according to the custome of the same City from the time whereof no memory is extant used approved in the same came certain M C and I W in their proper persons then and there by the name of M C and I W. of London Brewers levied a certain plaint against the said T. M. in his life time by the name of T M c. in a plea of Debt upon demand of a hundred pounds and then and there found pledges to prosecute that plaint to wit I. D. and R. R. and then and there in the same Court put in their places T H their Attorney against T M. of the plea aforesaid And aâ—terwards to wit at the Court of the said late Queen held at Guild Hall of the City aforesaid scituate in the parish of Saint Lawrence in the Old Jury London the â—ourteenth day of January Anno 42 Eliz. abovesaid before the same Sheriff came the said M and I. by their Attorney afoâ—esaid The Defendant appears gratis and pleads at the perill of the plaintiff Note That such form is the Common form of bayles in London and offered themselves against the said T. in the plea aforesaid whereupon the same T. M. in the same Court then and there in his proper person likewise came and freely offered himselfe to answer the said M and I. in the plea aforesaid whereupon the said T. M. afterwards in the same Court was bayled by I. D. and R. R. at the instance and perill of the same M and I. according to the custome of the City aforesaid to have the same T. M. at the said Court the same fourteenth day of January at Guildhall aforesaid to be held according to the custome of the City aforesaid and so afterwards from Court to Court untill the end of the plea Forme of the recognizance of the plaint aforesaid to answer the same M and I in the plea aforesaid according to the custome of the City aforesaid and the said T. M. then in the same Court put in his place F. T against the said M and I. in the plea aforesaid whereupon afterwards to wit at the Court of the said Lady the Queen held at Guildhall aforesaid Defendant makes his Attorney before the sa d then Sheriff the sixteenth day of January Anno 42 Eliz. abovesaid came as well the same M and I as the said T. by their Attornyes aforesaid and the same M and I by their Attornyes aforesaid declared against the said T of and upon their plaint aforesaid in manner and form as in these words followeth ss M. E. I. W. c. by T H. their Attorney demand against T. M. c. as in the Count word for word Count upon a Concessit solide untill Praedict sextam c. And the same T by his Attorney aforesaid then and there acknowledged the Debt aforesaid to be true whereupon then and there it was considered in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen That the same M and I should recover against the same T their Debt aforesaid together with nine shillings four pence Judgement by confession of the debt for their Damages costs and charges by them in and about their suit in that behalfe layd out and that the said T should be in mercy c. as by the Record aforesaid in the same Court of the said late Queen remaining more fully appeareth And the said Anne further saith That the said T. M. after the judgement aforesaid against the same T. in the said Court of the late Queen in Guildhal aforesaid in Forme aforesaid given to wit the thirtieth of December Anno c. at London in the parish c. made his last Will and Testament in writing and the same A constituted and ordained Executrix of the Testament aforesaid The death of the Defendannt and afterwards such a day and yeare at London in the parish and ward aforesaid the same M and I of the same one hundred pounds nine sh llings and four pence in form aforesaid recovered not being satisfied after whose death the same A took upon her the burthen of the Execution of the Testament aforesaid diverse goods and chattells which were of the said T. at the time of his Death Exâ—ences about the Fnner all to the value of thirty six pounds and five shilli after the Death of the same T came to the hands and possession of the same A whereby the same A 4. pounds of the said thirty six pound five shillings about the Funerall of the said T after the death of the same T expended Expences about proving the will and the same A twenty seven shillings of the said thirty sixe pounds five shillings about the probate of the Will aforesaid as Executrix of that Will after the Death of the said T likewise Expended And the same A further saith That she after the Death of the same T. and before the same A had any notice of the said Debt of one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T in his life time to the said E. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and before the day of purchasing the Writ of Scire facias of the said E. E. to wit such a day and year at London in the said parish of Saint Lawrence in the Old Jury London Payment of the judgment befere notice of such debt and
Judgment was given and in that case the Defen after Tryall and a speciall verdict given compounded with the plaintiff by the advise of I. P. Knight cheif Justice of England M 39. and 40. Eliz Rot. 110. ss Otherwise as it appeareth c. as in the Scire Facias and award the Alias Scire Facias Bar upon an Alias Sci fac upon a recognizance of priviledge where one makes default and the other pleads in bar payment of the condemnation at the perill of the Principall against him before the Teste of the first Scire facias Execution awarded against one of the Conuzers by default c. and now here at this day to wit at the said Tres Tri. came aswell the said I. by his Attorney aforesaid As the said S. by I E. his attorney And the said H. the fourth day of the Plea came not but made default And the sheriff as before now returneth that the said H. hath nothing nor is Found c. And hereupon the said I. prayeth execution against the said H. of the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. Therefore it is considered that the said I. have execution against the said H. for the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged by default c. And further the said I. prayeth execution against the said S. of the said 50 l by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. And the said I. prayeth license thereof to imparl here untill Oct. Mich. And hath it c the same day is given to the said I. here c and now here at this day to wit at the said Oct. S. Mich. came here aswell the same I. as the said S. by their attornies aforesaid And hereupon the same I. as before prayeth execution against the said S. of the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be adjudged him c ANd the said S. saith that the said I ought not to have execution a-against him for the said 50 l. in the Form aforesaid acknowledged Bar that the principall after the recovery and before the Teste of the Sci fac paid to the Conuzee the debt and damages recovered because he saith that the said E after the judgment aforesaid given And before the day of the purchasing of the said first Writ of Scire Facias to wit T. Die and An. paid to the said I the debt damages aforesaid by him against the said E in form aforesaid recovered according to the form and effect of the Recognizance aforesaid And this he is ready to verifie where upon he prayeth Judgment if the same I. ought to have execution against him for the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged c. Replication that the principall non solint and issue thereupon ANd the said I. saith that he by any thing before alleaged ought not to be repelled from having his execution aforesaid of the said 50 l. against the said S. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged because he saith that the said E. after the judgment aforesaid given and before the day of purchasing of the said first writ of Scire Facias hath not paid to the same I. the debt and damages aforesaid by the same I. against the said E. in Form aforesaid recovered according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid As the said S. hath above allowed and this he prayeth may bee inquired of by the Country And the said S. likewise Therefore 12. c. Entry of a Sci. fac against the Ter-tenants upon a judgment in debt after the death of the Obliger and the judgment by default Recitall of the recovery PAs 38. Eliz Rot. 1854. ss Otherwise as it appeareth in the Term of S. Hillary An. 38 Eliz. Reg. Rot. 511. It is thus contained Midd. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas H. S. Esquire lately in the court of the Lady the Queen now to wit in the Term of St. Michael An. regni sui 30. and 31. before E A. Knight and his associates of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against I. C late of London Esquire aswell a certaine debt of 19 l. as 7 l. which c. whereof he is convicted as by the record and proceedings in the court of the Queen here remaining manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon And the said I. C is dead and dyed seised of divers Lands and Tenements in his Demesne as of Fee as by the information of the said H. the Queen understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given Suggestion of the death of the Defendant and averment that he died seised of divers lands c. Sci. fac to the Ter-tenants or at any time afterwards That they should be here at this day to wit in Oct. Pur. St. Mariae to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said H. ought to have execution against them of the debt and damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements afore said according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid and now here at this day came the same H. by F B. his attorney and offered himself the 4th day against the said Tenants of the Lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time oft he judgment aforesaid given or at anytime afterwards in the plea aforesa d and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that there are no lands nor Tenements in his Bayliwick which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given The Sheriff returneth quod milli sunt Tenements A Testat sci fac prayed Corn Testat sci fac awarded to the Ter-tennants in a foraign County or any time afterwards and here upon it is testified in the same court of the Queen here that there are divers lands and Tenements in the county of C. which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards whereof he might make and levy the debt and damages aforesaid and prayeth a writ of the Lady the Queen to be directed to the sheriff of Cornwall to premonish the tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. in Oct. S. Mich. An. 30. and 31. abovesaid which day judgment was thereupon given or at any time afterwards in his Bayliwick that they be here 15. Pas to shew c. And now here at this day to wit the said 15 Pas came the same H. by his attorney aforesaid and offered himself the 4th day against the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in the
plea aforesaid and they being solmnly called came not and the sheriff of Cornwell to wit C. T. Esquire now retorneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed such a day and yeare Tertenant returned of a Messuage and thirty acres of land by W. N. and H. F. honest c. made known to R. D. Tenant of one messuage and 30. acres of land with the appurtenances in T. C. now or late in the tenure of I. C and L M which were of I C in Fee simple at the time of the judgment given and afterwards that he should be here at this day to shew in Form aforesaid c. Therefore it is considered that the said Hugh have his execution against the said R. D. Tenant of the debt and damages aforesaid to be levied Judgment of the said Massuage and 30 acres of Land with the appurtenances Execution by default for the debt and damages aforesaid to be levied of the lands and tenements aforesaid Elegit of the moyety awarded of the lands for default of the said R. and hereupon the said H chose to be delivered to him the moyety of the said messuage and 30. acres of land with the appurtenances according to the Form of the Statute thereof made and provided until the debt and damages aforesaid be thereof levyed and prayeth a writ of the said Lady the Queen thereof to be directed to the said sheriff of the County of Cornwall and it is granted him retornable here tres Trin. And in as much c. Brownlow H 43. Eliz Rot. 157. Suff. ff Scire fac For Seaman against the Ter-tenants of T. L Re. in Cr. Trini 41. Eliz. upon a Recognizance for 60 l. 33 s. 4 d. for damages For P L retorned ter-tenant of divers lands c. saith that the said T L before the said judgment 10. of August 35. Eliz enfeoffed I. and T Brown to the use of the said Tho. and his heires males and that he was seised in Spec. Fee-tayle at the time of the judgment given and that he 11. Sept 41 dyed seised in taile And that the Lands descended to the said P as Son and heir and that he entred and was seised in Spec. Taile judgment if execution c the Plaintiff saith that T was seised in fee simple Entry of a Sci fac upon a bail to make deliverance after gage deliverance of Cattell in Court against the Manucaptors because the Conusor had not made deliverance 1 H 7 11. 21 E 3. Bâ— Pledges 9. 18. at the time of the judgment given and traverseth the Feoffment modo et forma HAs 33. Eliz. Rot. 2045. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas G. G. of c R S. of c. in the Court of the Lady the Queen here to wit in the Term of St. Hillary An. c. 82 Before E.A. Knight c. of the bench here to wit at Westminster aforesaid had undertaken and both of them did undertake for S G that the same S should make deliverance return of 6. Cows to E C before the Feast of the Appostle P. I then next following under the penalty of both of them 40 l. which said 40 l. the same G S acknowledged and each of them acknowledgeth to be made of their Lands and Chattles and to belevied to the use of the said T. E. if the said S. G should not make deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid to the same T. according to the Form and effect of the recognizance aforesaid And the same S heitherto hath not made deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid to the said E. according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid as by the information of the said T. the Queen understandeth And because c. that by honest c. he make knowne to the said G. and S. that they should be here at this day to wit tali di to shew if any thing c. to wit the said G. wherefore he the said 40 l by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his lands and chattles And the same S. wherefore the said 40 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his Lands and chattles and either of them ought not to be made and rendred to the same T. according to the form of the recognizance aforesaid if c. At which day here came aswell the same T. by F. E. his attorny as the same G. and S. in their proper persons and hereupon the same T. prayeth execution against the same G. of the said 40 l. by him in Forme aforsaid acknowledged c. and against the said S. for the said 40 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged Test Nichil dic to be adjudged by him c. And the said G. and S. reserving to themselvs all and all manner c. Pet. tit entry of a Nihil dic hereupon Mich 34. Eli. Rot. 1813. Entry of a Sci fac upon a recognizance taken to make deliverance upon a gage deliverance against Manucapt because the Conusor had not made deliverance ss HIll 18. Eliz. Rot. 405. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas H. N. late c. and G. H. of c. lately in the Court of the Queen here to wit in Trinity term An. 17. c. before I. D. Knight and his associates Justices of the Lady the Queen here of the common Bench and undertook for W. C. that the said W. should make deliverance and retorn of ten Oxon or of the value of them to T. H. upon the tenth day of June then next following within the Church yard of the parish Church of S. in the county of S. under the penalty of 200 l. which said 200 l. the said H. and G. acknowledged to be made of their lands and Chattles and to be Levied to the use of the same T. and D. the said W. made not deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid nor of the value of them according to the Form of the racognizance aforesaid as by the information of the said T and D the Qu. understandeth T 9 Jac rot 3 510. and because c. that by honest c. he make knowne to the said H. and G. that they should be here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Hill to shew if c. wherefore the same T. and D. ought not to have execution against them of the said 200 l. according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid Sci. fac in a writ De droit de gard Sci facâ— upon judgment in debt and detinue if c. And now here at this day came aswell the said T. D by their attornies aforesaid as the same H and G. by F. their attorney And the sheriff now retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c And hereupon the said T. and D. pray execution against the same H. and G. of the said 200 l. to be adjudged them c. H 10. H. 6. Rot. 141. Scire Fac Upon a
make knowne to the same Iohn that he should be here at this day to wit 8. Hill to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Thomas execution against him for the said 20 l. the arreareges of the yearly rent aforesaid after the judgment aforesaid given as aforesaid being in arreare ought not to have according to the Form of the recovery if Judgment Nota bene P. 26. and 27. H. 8. rot 359. M. 29. and 30. E. rot 1024. hil 7 H. 8. rot 526. tiel judgment that Pl. have execution de arreragis tam tante diem impetr brev de Sci. fac qu. post incursis c. And here now at this day came the same Thomas by George N. his attorney and offered himselfe the fourth day against the said Io. in the plea aforesaid And he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he hath nothing c nor is found c Therefore it is considered that the said Tho. have execution against the said Iohn aswell of the said 20 l of arrearages of the yearly rent aforesaid after the judgment aforesaid given and before the day of the purchasing of the same writ of Scire fac as of 40 s. of arrearage of said yearely Rent after the day of purchasing of the same writ of Scire fac incurred which said arreages in the whole doe Amount unto twenty two pounds by default c. T. 22. Eliz. Dyer fo 377. Pl. 28. record T 24. Eliz. Rot. 1856. Forde London ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should not omit for any their liberties but that they should take Iohn Davis late of Scire fac to take baile where one comes to the bar and pleads matter in discharge of an utlawry c. utlawed in London ter die c. at the suite of Thomas Jurdaine in a plea of debt c. and safely c. so that they should have his body here at this day to wit in Cr. S. Tri. to do and receive what the Court of the Lady the Queen here shall consider of him in this behalfe c. And now here at this day came the same Iohn in his proper person and the sheriffs now retorne that they tooke the body of the same Iohn and the same have now ready hereupon the same I. so taken and brought to the Bar saith that he ought not to be injured in this behalf and that he by the Law of the land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that he at the day of the originall writ of the said Thomas and the day of publishing of the utlawry was conversant and commorant in the parts beyond the Seas Allegation that he lived beyond Sea the day of publishing of the utlawry to wit at the City of Valencia in the parts of Spain without this that the same daies or any of them was commorant or conversant at L. Reg. aforesaid in the same County of Dor. as by the writ aforesaid is supposed For which the utlawry aforesaid against the same John in form aforesaid published and had is altogether void and of no force nor effect in Law And this he is ready to veryfie whereupon he prayeth judgment and that he from the utlawry aforesaid quiet and discharged may be dismissed from the Bar here c. And because it is expedient and needfull that the said T. for his interest in this behalf be premonished before it be further proceeded in to discarge the same Io. from the utlawry aforesaid The sheriffs are commanded that by honest A Scire fac to premonish the party for his Interest c. c. they should make knowne to the said Thomas that he be here tres Tri. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same I ought not to be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid and hereupon W.W. of c. Merchant and I.B. of L. c. undertook to have the body of the same I here at the same Term so from day to day and at every day of the plea until the plea aforesaid should be ended and judgment therein should be given to wit each of them body for body Bayle body for body c. and the same Iohn Davis assumed for himself to be then here and at every day of the plea under the penalty of 10 l. which said 10 l. the same I. D. acknowledgeth to be made and levied of his Lands and Chattells to the use of the Lady the Queen to whose hands soever c. it shall happen the said Iohn Davis at the same Term or at any other day to him by the Court here in the premisses to be prefixed to make default or not to prosecute his Suit in this behalfe with effect At which day here came the said Iohn in his proper person And the sheriffs now retorne that the said Thomas Jurdaine hath nothing c. nor is found c. therefore as before the sheriffs are commanded that by honest c. they should make knowne to the said Thomas that he be here Men. Mich. to shew in Forme aforesaid Alias Scire fac awarded c. and in the interim the same Iohn Davis is dismissed by the bayle aforesaid c. P 12. Iac. Rot. 448. Walter Tarne of New Castell upon Tyne ss Entry of a Scire fac awarded and returned after a Capias upon statute merchamt into the Bench for the administration of the Conusce of the statute where the Conusee dyed after the capias returned Sâ—e M. 19. Iac. rot 726. P. 2. El. Dy fo 150 Pl. 49. 2. R. 3 fo 8. Pl. 16. that such a Sciâ—e fac lyeth not in this case F. N. B. fol. 13 Register of writs fo 1486 It was commanded the sheriff whereas it was latly commanded by Writ of the said Lord the King to the same sheriff that the body of I. H. late of H. in the County of Durham Knight if he were a Lay man and found in his bayliwick he should take and in prison of the Lord the King should safely keep untill he had fully satisfied to I. H. c. Gent. of 1600 l. which the same I. H. Knight the 10. day of August An. c. 8. before T. L. then Mayor of the towne of New-Castell upon Tyne and W. I. then Clerk deputed to take Recognizances of deb according to the Form of the statute merchant within the same Towne acknowledged himself to owe to the same I.H. Gent. which to him he ought to have paid at the Feast of the birth of our Lords then next to come the same to him hath not paid c. and in asmuch c. he should make appeare to the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid Men. Pas last past and the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King to wit at Westminster aforesaid at that day retorned that the same I. H. Knight is a lay man
or Coppice called Weston Wood aforesaid and also the third part of the profits of the Mannor-Court of Weston upon the green aforesaid Tythes of wood Third part of the profits of Mannor Couâ—t 3d part of the the advowson of the vica ridge of W. and of one Close called Cow-lease c. And also the Advowson of the vicaridge of the Church of Weston aforesaid to hold to the said Countesse and her assignes in severalty by metes and bounds in the name of her whole Dower to her out of the Hundred Mannor Tenements Rectory and Advowson aforesaid after the death of the sayd Francis late Earl of Berks her late Husbandhapning as by the sayd Writ to him it was commanded c. The like assignment of Dower between the same parties upon the same Roll. Summons ss JUry of twenty four Knights of the Neighbour hood of T. ven recogn if the Jury by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned in the Court of the Lady the Queen Entry of a writ of summons in an attaint executed and awarding of a resummons against the defendant hab corp against the grand Iury and Distring against the petii jury before the Iustices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by writ of the Lady the Queen and afterwardr before the Beloved and faithfull of the said Lady the Queen R. C. Knight Cheif Iustice of the Lady the Queen assigned to hold pleas before the said Queen and G. G. Esquire Attorney Generall of the said Lady the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lady the Queen of Nisi prius by Form of the statute c. at Stonystratford in the County aforesaid taken between R M. Gent. plaintiff and I.Y. of T. c. and R. W. of T. c. of a certain Trespasse to the same R. by the said I. and R. done as it was said made a false oath as the same R. greivously complaining hath shewed to the said Lady the Queen or not And now here at this day to wit in Octab sancti Hillarii came the same R. M. by T. his Attorney and the said I. Y. and R.W. summoned c. 4 Die pl. being solemnly called came not and of them the sheriff now returned that he summoned Summons returned c. therefore let the same I.Y. and R W. be resummoned that they be here 15. Pas to hear the sayd Iury of twenty four Knights and also J. Jugram I. S. I. S. c. twelve Iurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid being called came not and of them the sheriff now returneth that every one of them is severally attached by pledges J Denn and R Fenn Hab. corp Iur. 24 Milit. Therefore they in mercy c. therefore the Iury of twenty four Knight aforesaid is respited here untill the said Terme Distring Iur. prim inqisitionis c. and that the sheriff have then and there the bodyes of the same Iury of twenty four Knights to make the said Recognizance c. their Lands c. and that of the issues c so that he may have their bodies here at that Terme to heare the Recognizance the same day is given to the same R.M. here c. P 8. Jac. rot 1938. Brownlow Lincoln ss Entry of a writ of summ and resumm in attaint and Distring awarded against the grand Iury the party and the petit Iury. Iury of twenty four Knights of the Neighbourhood of W. vid. Recogn si Jur. by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned before the Lord the King at Westminster by Bill without the writ of the said Lord the King between Henry Earl of Lincolne one of the Peeres c. of England and Ed. Dymock Knight of certain Trespasses and contempts against the Forme of the statute De scandalis magnat therein lately made and provided and afterwards before the beloved and faithfull Peter Warburton Knight one of the Iustices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench and Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench Iustices of the said Lord the King assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lord the King De nisi prius by Forme of the statute therein made and provided P 4. Eliz rot 532. Cerciorare to certifie a retorn whereupon an attaint is brought The grand jury the Defendant and the petit Jury make default Quaere the sheriff returns not the writ Resummons awarded against the grand Jury parties and petit Iury. at the Castle of Lincolne in the County aforesaid taken made a false Oath as the said Earl to the said Lord the King now greiviously complaining sheweth or not And now here at this day to wit Tres Sept. Pasch here came the sayd Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the Iurors of the Iury of twenty four Knights aforesaid as the same E. D. and also Lawrence Coddington of C. with eleven other Iurors of the first inquisition aforesaid being solemnly called came not therefore let the same jurors of the jury of twenty four Knights be resummoned that they be here in Octab. Sancti Trinitatis to make the jury of twenty four Knights and that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill that Terme and as well the said E as the said jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid are resummoned that they may be here at the same time to hear the said Iury of twenty four Knights the same day is given to the said Earle here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff did nothing therein nor sent the writ thereof therefore as before let another writ thereof be made returnable here 15. Michaelis the same day is given to the said Earl here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the sayd Edward as the said twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid resummoned Al. resum awarded c. 4 Die pl. being called came not c. and also the jury of twenty four Knights aforesaid likewise being called came not therefore that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill Cr. sancti Martini and the sheriff is commanded that he distrain as well the sayd jury of twenty foure Knights that they be then here to make the jury of twenty foure Knights aforesaid A Distring awarded See the like between the parties aforesaid M 9 Iac rot 3127. Br. as the same Edward as the same Iury of twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid that they be here at the same time Auditur Recognitionem illam c. the same day is given to the said Earle here c. and it is to be known that a writ thereof the Iustices here in Court that same Terme have delivered a writ thereof to R. S.
the County of Lincoln and by the opinion of Court it was adjudged Male for that the proclamation ought to have been at least a Mo. before the 5. Eactus and the reason in the court was for that the retorne of the proclamation was that the defendant should yeeld himselfe to the sheriff of Lincoln which he could not do before the utlawry for that the utlawry was pronounced the same day with the proclamation ss Mich. 36. and 37. Eliz. rot 2894. London ss Entry of a travers de Comorance in an other county reversall of an utlawry pur non Comorans and possession of the attorney generall It was commanded the sheriffs that they should not omit for any liberty of their County but they should take P. L. of c. utlawed in London upon Munday next after the Feast of the Ascention of our Lord An 36. Eli. at the suite of W. G. in a plea of debt if c. and safely c. so that they might have his body here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Mich. c. to do and receive what the Court of the Lady the Queen here shall consider of him in that behalfe And now here at this day came the same P. in his proper person the sheriffs of L. novv retorne that they by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to them directed took the body of the same P. whose body they have now here present as by the said writ it was commanded them and hereupon the same P. so taken here had prayeth the hearing of the Record Alit sur Comorans in aut Uill in codem Com. Pas 2. Iac. rot 1012. of the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Exigent whreupon the same P. at the suite of the said W. was in Form aforesaid utlawed issued And it is read unto him in these words London ss W. E. Gent by E. Y. his attorney offered himselfe the 4. day against P. L. late of c. otherwise called P. L. c. of a plea that he render unto him 200 l. which to him he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. Recital of the record of the exigent Pas 37. Iac. rot 1612. T. 3. Ia rot 651. issue fuit Comorans And he came not and as more times the sheriffs are commanded that they should take him c. and safely c so that they might have his body here at this day to wit tali die to answer the said W. in the plea aforesaid And the sheriffs now retorne that he is not found c. Therefore the sheriffs are commanded that they put him in Exigent from Hust to Hust untill c. he be utlawed if not c. and if c. then they take him and safely c. so that they may have his body here in Cr. Trin. to answer the said W. in the plea aforesaid and whereupon c. And it is to be knowne that a writ thereof the Justices here in Court that same Terme delivered to Z. deputy of the sheriffs of London in Form of Law to be executed Proclamation awarded upon the exigent c. and the sheriffs of Midd. is commanded that in his full county he proclame the same P. three severall daies according to the Forme of the statute An. 31. Eliz. thereof made and provided that the same P. render himselfe to the sheriffs of London so that the same sheriffs may have his body here at the same Terme to answer the said W. in the plea aforesaid 31. Eliz. Cap. 3. Poulton novell statuts 186. or 77 86. And it is to be knowne that a Writ thereof the Justices here in Court that same Term delivered to Z. S. Deputy of the sheriff of Midd. to be executed in Forme of the Law c. which being read and heard the same P. saith that he is injured in this behalf and that he by the Law of the Land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that he at the aforesaid Oct. Pur. which day the said Writ of exigent whereupon the said P. was utlawed at the suite of the said W. issued out of the court here Plea that at the awarding the Exigent he was comorant in an other County Traverse was Comorant and conversant at N. within the Isle of Weight in the county of Southampton without this that he the same day or at any time afterwards was comorant or conversant at Graies Inn in the county of Midd. as by the same Record issuing forth of the said writ of Exigent is suposed and this he is redy to veryfie whereupon for that the said Writ of proclamation was not directed to the sheriff of the said County of Southampton wherein the same P. at the day of issuing forth of the said Writ of Exigent was Comorant and Conversant as of right it ought to have beene directed according to the Form of the statute aforesaid the same P. prayeth judgment and that he from the Court here of the utlawry aforesaid may be acquitted discharged and set at large And because it is expedient and necessary Scire Fac. awarded to premonish the Pla. that the said W. for his interest in this behalfe be premonished before it be further proceeded to discharge the same P. from the utlawry aforesaid It is commanded the sheriff of London that by honest c. they make knowne to the same W. that he be here in Cr. Anim. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same P. ought not to be discharged from the said utlawry c. and hereupon the same M. W. of c. and R. C. The defen is bayled the entry of the Recog Note the form of the recog of c. undertook and each of them did undertake for the same P. to have his body here at the said Term and so from day to day at every day of the plea untill the plea aforesaid be determined And judgment thereupon given to wit each of them body for body and the said P. in his proper person assumed upon himself to be then here at every day of the plea under the penalty of 10 l. which said 10 l. the said P. acknowledged to be made and levied to the use of the said Lady the Queen of his goods Return of a Scire Fac and the Pl. appears by Attorney and Chattells to whose hands soever they shall come and if it happen the same P at any day of the plea by the Court here to be prefixed to make default or not to prosecute his suite with effect c. At which said Cr. Anim came here aswell the said P in his proper person as the same W. premonished c. by E. Y. his attorney and hereupon the same P. as before saith that he at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said Writ of Exigent whereupon the same P. was utlawed at the suite of the said W issuâ—ng out of the Court here Count against
whereas in truth Martine Lumnly was not then sheriff of the said City but certaine Martain Lumnley and the said Peter Probey were then sheriffs of the said City c. M 23. and 24. Eliz. rot 339. Midd. ss For that the same R. by vertue of the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid Utlary reversed for that the Supersedeas upon the Exigent was entred upon Record before the Defendant was 5 exactus to wit the 27. day of Ap. An. c. came here into the court and then proved a writ of the said Lady the Queen of Super quia improvide For that the said Writ of Exigi fac whereupon the said R. is utlawed out of the Court here erroniously issued For that the said Rob. by the said I. C. his attorney at the day of the returne of the plu Cap. thereupon and alwaies afterwards before the issuing forth of the said writ of Exigi facias often times offered himselfe to answer to the said M. in the plea aforesaid By pretext whereof it is commanded to the said sheriff of Midd. that of putting in Exigent utlawing taking or in any thing molesting of the said same R by occasion of the premises he be altogether Superseded as by the said Writ of Supers entred upon Roll in the Court of the Queen in the county held 15. Pas Rot. 1020. it sufficiently appeareth And this the same I. C. for the said R. is ready to veryfie by the Record And so the utlawry aforesaid against him in Forme aforesaid published is void Whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said R. may be quiet of the utlawry aforesaid and discharged from the court here and set at large whereupon the Record being seene and upon the oath of R. U. servant of the said I. C. of his delivery of the writ of Sup. before the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid To one T. L. then being under sheriff of the county of Mi. before I. Dyer Knight Cheife Justice here examined and also the said T. L. then present not contradicting the reception of the said writ It sufficiently appeareth to the Justices here that the allegation of the said I. C. in discharge of the said R. from the utlawry aforesaid is true therefore it is considered that the said utlawry be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that the said R. upon that occasion be in nothing molested or grieved but goe thereof without day c. M 19. Iac. rot 2047. Brownlow London in t B. and E. Oyer of the return of the Ex. fac prayed which being read c. onerari non because he saith that in many places of the said return is used a certaine word to wit Civit. written for this word Civit. which word Civit. so written is no word of sense nor Latine having in it any signification Eaq causa Utlaâ— reversed for this Word Civit. for Civitat H 12 Jac rot 2265 quto for quinto the utlawry reversed by Justice Hutton Hill 8. Iac. Rot. 3526. Coronator for Coronatorum H. 12. Iac. Rot. 1949 Brownl inter S. and S. exact and not written exact with a dash T. 13 Iac. Rot. 3538. ura for vra T 19. Jac. rot 635. Anino for Anno. H. 11. Ja rot 3524 praedictus for praedictis same roll mercii for marcii rot 3522 mertris for martins ad Com. Exon for ad commit Civitatis Exoniae T 13 Jac Rot. 3527 Brownlow quinto Exactus for quarto Exact 13 Jacobus Rot 2538 utlawry that it appeared not where the Castle of Leic. is Hill 12. Iac. rot 2265. T. 13. Iac. rot 3538 that there is no such Feast as Kenelim Rs. and Martiris T. 13. Iac. Rot. 635. for no returne in the Writ of Exigi fac-to warrant the writ H. 37 Eliz. rot 132. non comperuit omitted in the retorne of the Exigi fac P. 24 H. 6. rot 24. reversall for that 2. Cap. were filed and not the plures T. 9. Iac. rot 129. Crompton for that the Feast at which the first hustings were held was before the Test of the Exigi fac M 10. Iac. rot 1709. Brownlow reversal for false Lattine Vtlary of the intestate reversed by the Administrator by speciall entry in the same term in which the Utlary was reversed to wit comperuit for comperuere H. 11. Iac. rot 3522. reversall for that it appeareth not in the returne that the old sheriffs had delivered the Writ to the new M 21. Iac. rot 3059. Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of the County aforesaid but that he should take I. B. late of F. in the County aforesaid Gent. Executor of the Testament of I. B. late called I. B of F in the County of Norff Yeoman utlawed in the County aforesaid 6 Ap. An. 22. Eliz. at the suite of W. Gray Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of R. G. who dyed intestate c. T 3. or 5 Car rot 531. the like for B. in a plea of debt whereof he is convicted if c. And safely c. so that he should have his body here at this day to wit in Oct. Martini to doe and receive what the Court of the Lord the King shall consider of him in that behalf Return mortues And now here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Martini the sheriff of the said County of Norff. to wit R. B. Baronet retorneth that the said I. H 12 Jac rot 829. tiel H 45 Eliz rot 2834. generall pardon pleaded by the Executor for him that died utlawed is dead And hereupon came in to the Court one R. S. of F. in the county aforesaid Gent. Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of the said James in his proper person and saith that the said Iames after the publishing of the said utlawry to wit The 8. day of Ianuary An. 20 Rs. nunc at F. aforesaid dyed intestate c. And that the administration of the goods and chattles which were of the said I. at the time of his death by Robert Redmaine Doctor of laws c. The tenth day of Ianuary An. Dom. 1622. at F. aforesaid to the said administrator after the death of the said Iames was committed and he bringeth here into the Court the letters administratory of the said Officiall which the commission of the administration aforesaid in Forme aforesaid testifie c. whose date is the same 10. day of Ianuary An. Dom. 1622. abovesaid and for the securing of the goods and chattles which were of the said I. at the time of his death from the utlawry aforesaid he prayeth the hearing of the return of the said writ de Exigi Faciend whereupon the said Ia. at the suit of the said VVilliam was utlawed And it is read unto him in these words Norff. At my county held at the castle of Nor. within the shiere-house in the county aforesaid the 25. day of December An. Reg. 24 within written The within
been held And this they are ready to verifie whereupon c. T 8. Iac. rot 4640. which being read and heard onerari non Vtlary reversed for omitting the second exact between the first and third because he saith that by the retorne aforesaid it evidently appeareth that the said R. was never the second time called upon the said Writ of Exi fac so that the utlawry aforesaid against the said Ric. the second calling of him the said R. upon the Writ aforesaid being omitted was published and had so that the utlawry aforesaid against him the said R. so published and had is void and this c. The utlawrie is reversed Januaii for Januarii Vtlary reversed for omitting the return of the Plu. cap. in the close of the Exigent H 22. Iacobi rot 1404. Ianuaii for Ianuarii H. 7. Iac. rot 3503 utlawry reversed for omitting the retorn of the plu cap. in the close of the Exigent P 10. H. 4. rot 337. One renders himselfe prisoner to the Fleet upon an utlawry And because it appeareth that the exigent was not entred upon record in any other Terme he is discharged of the utlawry and set at large Norff. I. at the suit of D. Veiwe Entry of a writ of view in Formedon in discender and a quashment of the same for a speedier returne thereof then by Law it ought TRin. 8. Iac. roll 485. Wolastone City of Yorke ss It was commanded the sheriffs that without delay they should cause to be had to the Gardian searcher or master of the Scoole and Elemosinary poore of the Hospitall of S. Iohn the Baptist in K. R. the view of one Mesuage with the appurtenances in the parish of Arpon the pavement which William Lister in the court here claimeth against them as his right by writ of the Lord the King de forma donationis in discendere and that it should be said to 4. Knights who should be present at that view That they should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Trin. to testifie the said view And that they should have here the names of the Knights and that writ and now here at this day came aswell the said W. L as the Gardian c. by their attorneys aforesaid and upon this Writ of view is quashed because it appeareth here that the said writ is vitious to wit in this that it issued forth retornable here on the said morrow of the holy Trinity where it ought by due course of Law to have beene made retornable here tres Trin. because the plea aforesaid had his last continuance untill Oct. Pur. Beat. Mariae last past Therefore at the petition of the demandant A new writ of view awarded and by the consent of the attorny of the said Guardion c. let another writ thereupon be made in Form as aforesaid retornable here in Cr. Anim. And in the meane while c. at which day here came the parties c. by their attornies and the sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore let another Writ thereof be made in Form aforesaid retornable here tres Pas the same day is given to the same W. L here c. TRin. 11. Iac. roll 3388. Goldesburgh Ebor. ss The sheriff was commanded that he should attach William Denton so that he might have him here at such a day to answer W. H. Gent. one of the attornies Entry of a baile taken upon an attachment of Priviledge in an action of debt c. according to the liberties and priviledges c. of a plea of debt c. and now here at this day came aswell the said W. H. in his proper person as the said W. D. in his proper person under the custody of the sheriff of the county aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid here brought to the bar And hereupon such a day that same Term before Peter W. Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King c. at his chamber in Chancery-lane London came the said W. D. in his proper person under the custody of the sheriff of the county aforesaid And hereupon one R. W. of Cliffords Inne London being present in his proper person before the said Justices undertooke for the said W. D. H 8. b. 8 rot 1. an appearance entred upon an attachment upon an information in the summe of 20 l. and the said William D. assumed for him selfe in the summe of 40 l. to have the body of the said W. D. here in court from day to day at every day of pleading untill the plea be determined and judgment be thereupon given and also if it happen judgment in the same plea to be adjudged for the same W. Hamp against the said W. Denton would satisfie or render his body in execution to the prison of the said Lord the King of the Eleet upon that judgment which said sum of 20 l. the said R. acknowledged to be made out of his lands and chattles and which said summe of 40 l. the said Will. Denton acknowledged Recognizance enrolled c. as in others which said recognizance the said Justice with his owne hands delivered here in Court that same Terme to be inroled upon record T 28. H. 8. rot 328. View View was granted in a Writ de consuetudinibus and Servitiis M 2. and 3. P and M. rot 315. Norff. ss Alias writ of view awarded where the Sheriff retu ned upon the first writ of view that none of the Demandants would shew him the lands It was commanded the sheriff that justly c. he cause to be had to T. K. Knight the view of the mannors of B. B with the appurtenances which Geo. O. Esq in the Court of the Lord the King and the Lady the Queen here claymeth against him by Writ of the said Lady the Queene de ingru in le per And that he should say to 4. Knights who would be present at that view that they should be here at this day to wit tres Mich. to testifie the said view And now here at this day came aswell the said G. by I. C. his attorney as the said T. by P. P. his attorney And the sheriff to wit I. S now retorneth that none on the part of the said demandant came to shew the said sheriff the Mannors aforesaid and for that default he could by no meanes execute the execution and command of that Writ As that Writ in it selfe doth exact and require Therefore as before let the said Thomas have view of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances the same day is given aswell to the said George as to the said Thomas here c. in Cr. Pur. and in the meane time c. THat the view ought to be examined in an assize and Wast and that there ought to be 6. Nota. Recognitors to have the veiw and that 4. of them be hundreders c. Venire Facias P 3. and 4. P. and M. rot 126. Whotly
Sure pledges the said I. that he should be here at this day to vvit A die Pas in un mensem to ansvver asvvell the said Lady the Queen of the contempt as to the said W. of the Damages and injuries to him in this behalfe done c. And novv here at this day came asvvell the same I. by I. P. his attorney as the same W. by P. K. his attorney and the sheriff to vvit H V Esquire novv retorneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed took in Withernam three Covvs of the goods cattles of the said I And caused them to be delivered to the said W to hold to him untill the Oxe aforesaid before taken might be retorned And that the said I vvas attached by his cattles to the value of 12 d. And hereupon the same I prayeth to be admitted to make a fine vvith the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the premisses And is admitted c. and is fined by the Justices here to 3 s. 4 d. vvhich by the command of the Justicas here he paid to R. B. Esquire cheife Prothonotary of the Court of the Common bench of the said Lady the Queen here for necessary reparations of the Court here don and to be don Note that it is a better form to award the writ of 2 Deliverance after the Recognizance Fit Na br fo 72 D Therefore the same I. may goe thereof vvithout day c. or quiet c And hereupon the same I. by the statute c. prayeth a Writ of the Lady the Queen de secund delib And it is granted him retornable here in Cr. S Trin. and also the same I. in the said Court here found pledges of nevv as vvell to prosecute his claime as to retorn to the same W the Oxe aforesaid before taken or the price of the same cattle if retorne thereof be adjudged to vvit I P of c under the penalty of the said I K. 20 l. and I. G. of c. under the penalty of the same I P and I G of 40 l. c. vvhereupon the sheriff vvas commanded that vvithout delay he make deliverance to the same I of the cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam Note that divers prefidents mentioned the writ at large And in asmuch c he make to appeare here at the said Cr. S. Trin. c. and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges the said W. that he should be here at this day or the said Term to ansvver to the same I. of the taking of the Cattle aforesaid before taken c. The like in Hill 12. Ja. rot T 9 Iac rot 11 Brownlow in t Smith and al Mich 16 Ia rot 505 Mich 34 and 34 Eliz rot 617. after entry of the pledges c. thus after wards to Wit at the said Cr Trin. came the said I by his attorney aforesaid and by the statute c. prayeth a writ second deliverance c. 2280 Brownlow between Wenworth and Wilton See Mich 10. Jac rot 393. or 2393. between Loueday and White like pledges c. Note that in this case the Plaintiff prayeth that the defendants attorney present in Court might gage to him deliverance of the cattle taken in Withernam And Serieant Pelham mooved the Court Gage deliverance prayed denyed that the course was such and shewed a president in Hill 15. Eliz rot 708 where a demurrer was upon the like point and was adjudged that the Attorny should gage deliverance for his Clyent and also he vouched the authority but notwithstanding that the court held such course to be very inconvenient for the attorneys and there upon adjudged that a Writ should issue out to the sheriffs to deliver the cattle taken in Withernam as in this president which note ALso at the said Cr. Nota Trin the sheriff retorned that the Cattle taken in Withernam were inlarged Testar Capias in Withernam and moreover that he to whom they were delivered had nothing in the County And in truth they were eloyned in an other County and hereupon a testat br awarded in the other County where the cattle were eloyned ANd also that Justice Glanvill said that he who shall have Cattle in Withernam cannot sell them or kill them Mich 11 Eliz Dyer fo 280 Pl accord as he who hath Cattle irreplegiable and in that case an Action of trover well lyes after tender of satisfaction in Court which note but inquire M 36. and 37. Eliz. rot 2640. Brownlow An entry as in the president before the entry of the pledges de novo at the end of the recognizances And hereupon the same T. prayeth that the said W may gage to him deliverance of the cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam in Forme aforesaid which said W. to gage deliverance of the same Cattles in forme aforesaid taken in Withernam here in Court refused Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of Devo that those cattle taken in Withernam in Form aforesaid without delay he cause to be delivered to the same T. and what c. The sheriff make appeare here c.. in Oct. Hill c. P 11. Jac. rot 2446. VValter Sommerset Int. P. and P. such an entry after Cap. in VVithernam entred and pledges found if retorne thereof should be adjudged to wit W. R. and H. W. Subpoena 10 l. which the same W. and H have acknowledged and both of them do acknowledg to be made of their Goods and Chattles to the use behoof of the avowant to belevied If it shal happen the said R. not to make deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid before taken in forme as aforesaid Or not to satisfie the said I. of the price of the cattle and hereupon the same K. prayeth deliverance of the said cattle taken in Withernam as is aforesaid to her to be adjudged c and because the said I. was solemnly called to gage deliverance and came not therefore it is considered that the said K. may have returne of the Cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam therefore it is commanded to the said sheriff that the cattle aforesaid by him taken in VVithernam without delay he cause to be delivered to the said K. and in asmuch c. the sheriff make to appeare here in Cr. Trin. c. THE TABLE Abatement ABatement pleaded to a Scire fac against an administrator for that the administration was by two and but one named in the Scire fac fo 1. Admission Admittance to a fine after a Cepi Corpus returned upon a Capias pro fine ib. Admittance to a Fine after Averia elongat returned in a retorn habend ib. Admission of the third Prothonotary to his Office fo 3. Admission of the second Prothonotary to his Office ib. Accedas ad cur Accedas ad cur entred to remove a cause out of the court Baron c. And a Procedendo granted c. for the insufficiency of the cause shewne fo
may be spared about the Issue of the Country in this behalf to be tryed prayeth himself to be admitted to make a Fine with the said Lord by occasion of the premisses c. And hereupon the said T. R. found pledges in Court here to the said Lord the King for that contempt to wit T. S. and R. C. whereupon the Justices of the Lord the King here do assesse the Fine of the said T. R. by occasion of the Premisses ad propert sup dict Therefore the said T.R. of that contempt be quiet and go thereof without day c. P. 3. Ca Reg. rot 42. amongst the Pleas of lands Brownlow The admission of the third Prothonotary unto his Office Be it remembred That the seventh day of May that same Tearm Thomas Richardson Knight chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Common Bench here freely granted to R. M. Gent. one of the Clerks of Richard Brownlow Esquire chief Prothonotary of the Court of Common Bench aforesaid here the Office of the third Prothonotary of the Bench aforesaid here now being void by the death of Thomas Waller Esquire late third Prothonotary of the same Court of the Bench aforesaid here And admitted the same Robert to that Office to have hold and enjoy to the same Robert for term of his life as his free Tenement according to the custome of the Court aforesaid from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary used and approved And also the same Robert as wel the Oath of the Kings Supremacy according to the form of the Statute in this case made and provided as his corporall oath well and faithfully to carry and behave himself in the same Office before hand taken as the custome is into corporall possession of the same office put and instituted to hold occupy and enjoy the same in form as aforesaid so fully and wholly and in the same manner and form Vad. as the same Thomas Waller late had and occupyed the same office perceiving in the same office Wages Fees Profits Commodities and Emoluments to the same office due and accustomed c. T. 12. Ed. 4. Rot. 494 Copley Midd. ss The admission of the second Prothonotary unto his Office Be it remembred that William Comberford lately having and occupying in the Court of the King here the Office of one of the Prothonotaries of this Court the same to wit the office which Thomas Brown during his life-time in time past and immediatly before the same Thomas Brown had exercised and occupyed and which said office William Wakefeild during his life time in time past and immediatly before the same Thomas Brown had exercised and occupyed the eleventh day of June that same tearm died after whose death that office was vacant and continued so vacant until the fifteenth day of June then next following which said fifteenth day John Fogge Knight chief Clerk of the Lord the King and Keeper of the Rolls of the said Lord the King of this Court to whom by reason of that office the Donation or Presentation of one of the Prothonotaries of this Court is known of right to belong Came here in Court in his proper person and gave to the Court here to understand that the said office of one of the Prothonotaries by the death of the said William Comberford was void and gave and granted to Roger Brent and constituted and ordained him to have and occupy that Office And the same Roger being in his proper person to be admitted to the said office was presented to Thomas Bryan chief Justice of the Lord the King of this Court to whom by reason of his office belongeth the admission of every person to the same office whensoever it is void by the chief Clerk of the Lord the King and keeper of the Rolls and Writs of the said Lord the King of this Court for the time being present requiring the same chief Justice that he would admit the same Roger to the said office of one of the Prothonotaries and that he would think worthy to put in full possession of the same And hereupon the same chief Justice here in the premisses by mature deliberation and advisement And as well to the ability as to the long and tedious continuance attendance and exercise of the said Roger in this Court consideration and respect being had admitted the same Roger to that office and swore him well and faithfully to occupy and exercise the same office and put the same Roger into full possession of the same office to have and exercise the same to the said Roger for tearm of his life as fully and entirely and in the same manner and form as the same William Wakefeild T. B. and W. Comberford or any of them or any other the said office before their times had and occupyed receiving in the same Wages and Fees Profits Commodities and Emoluments to the same office due and accustomed Accedas ad cur to remove a plaint cut of a Court Baron c. and a Procedendo granted for that the cause is sufficient to remove the plaint and the Common Bench will not hold plea thereof M. 13 44. Eliz. Rot. 2175. T 18 Iac. Rot. 1959 H. 9 Jac. Rot. 2008 1425. Accedas ad Curiam T. 13. Eliz. Rot. 1276. ss The Lady the Queen sent to the Sheriff of Southampton her Writ closed in these words Elizabeth c. That taking with you four discreet and lawfull Knights of your County In your proper person you come to the Court of Gabriel White Esquire in O. in full Court there and cause to be recorded the Plaint which is in the same Court without our Writ according to the custome of the same Court between William Marquesse of Winchester and the Lady Eliz. Warham Widow of a certain Trespasse to the said Marquesse by the same Eliz. done as is said and bring that Râ—cord before our Justices at West in Cro. Trinitatis under your Seal and the Seals of four lawfull men of that Court who shall be present to the same Record and that you prefix the same day to the parties that they should be then there to proceed in the same Plaint as shall be right And have you there the names of the same four lawfull men and this Writ Witnesse our selfe at Westminster the eigth day of May An. c. 13. because the same Eliz claimeth to hold the Tenements wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be done by the Common Law Cause and not according to the custome of the Mannor of O. for which that Plaint in the same Court ought not further to be drawn let execution be done upon that Writ if the cause be true and the same Eliz. shall desire this or otherwise not By vertue of which said Writ G. Wells Esquire Sheriff of the County aforesaid now here at the said Cro. Trinitatis returned that he took with him S. C. I. H. G. H. and I.H. four discreet
the Form of the statute aforesaid untill he shall have levyed the debt and damages aforesaid And in as much as that command shall be executed he shall make appeare here in Cr. Anim. by the letters of the same Bishop sealed c. T 18. Iac. Rot. 3057. Brownlow Essex ss Whereas Iohn Hill lately in our court before our Justices at Westminster by the consideration of the same court had recovered against Mary Wroth late of London widdow otherwise called M. W. c aswell a certaine debt of 400 l. as 80 s. which c. whereof she is convicted the said Iohn afterwards came into our said court and by the statute c. chose to be delivered to him all the goods and chattles of the said Mary besides Oxon and cattle of her plough and likewise the moyety of all her lands and tenements of which the same Mary in Crastino S. Trin. last past upon which day the judgment aforesaid was given against her or at any time afterwards was seised without delay Entry of an Elegit after an elegit he should cause to be delivered to the same Iohn by reasonble price and extent to hold to him the goods and chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and chatties and also to hold to him the moyety aforesaid as his free tenement to him and his assignes according to the form of the statute aforesaid untill the debt damages should be levied thereof and in asmuch c. he should make appeare to our Justices here at Westminster in Cr. Pur. S. Mariae last past And you at that day returned to our Justices at Westminster a certaine Inquisition taken before you at S. L. in your county the 12. day of Dec. last past by the oath of 12. c. taken by which it is found that the same Mary at the said Cr S. Trinitat and after that day was seised in her demesnes of Fee tenant for terme of life of and in the Mannor and cheife mesuage of L. al. L. with all their right members and appurtenances c. And further that the same Mary at the said day of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards had any other goods or chattells or any other or more Mannors lands tenements in your County which to the knowledg of the Jurors of the Inquisition aforesaid could be extended or appraised you further retorned to our Justices at the same day that none came to you on the behalf of the said Iohn to pray deliverance to be made to him of the moyety of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid by the inquisition aforesaid found so that to further execution of the said writ you could not proceed whereupon the same Iohn came into our said Court saying that the same Mary a the time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards had divers lands and Tenements in your County to the value of 40 l besides the Mannor and Tenements in the inquisition aforesaid specified and also was possessed of divers goods and chattles to the value of 100 l. which you could have extended and apprised and delivered to the same Iohn And therefore wee command you as more times we have commanded you that all the goods and Chattles of the same Mary besides Oxon c. And likewise the moyety c. besids the same mannor and Tenements in the Inquisition aforesaid specified of which the same Ma. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards was seised possessed of and also the moyety of the Mannors and Tenements in the inquisiton aforesaid specified you cause to be delivered to the said Iohn by reasonable price and extent to hold as his Free tenement to him and his assignes according to the form of the statute c. untill the debt and damages be thereof levyed And in asmuch as you shall have executed this our command you make appeare c. SVff ss Whereas E. T. and Mary his wife in our Court before our Justices at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recoverd against Iohn Addams 20 l. for the value of the dower of the same Mary of one messuage and one Garden with the appurtenances in Bury S. Ed. from the time of the death of R. Cage her late husband Entry of an Elegit for the value in Dower As for theire damage which they had by occasion of the detayning of the said dower whereof he is convicted And the same Io. and Mary afterwards came in to our said Court and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to them c. As in others to hold to them and their assignes according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid untill the said 20 l. for the value and damages aforesaid shall be thereof levyed c. in asmuch c. he should make appeare here Men. Pas c. P 29. or 30. Eliz. Rot. 651. Tender of the body in execution in discharge of the Manucaptors London ss Be it remembred that the third day of May that same terme came here into the court M. F. in this own person And offered his body in execution upon the judgment for damges cost and charges which W. F. in the Queens Court here recovered against him as in a certaine action of trespasse upon the case according to the Form of a certaine Recognizance here by the same M. and certaine Henry Lues of the Parish c. Butcher and Giles Holden of the Parish c. haberdasher in Mich. term Ann. Reg. Regin 27 and 28. acknowledged for in discharge of his Manucaptors aforesaid c. And hereupon William Knight attorney of the said W. F. by the court here conferred with if he would commit the body of the said M. in execution for the debt and damages aforesaid to the prison of the Fleet there to stay upon that occasion or not said that not Therefore aswell the said Manucaptors as the said M. from the Recognizance aforesaid and summes of money contayned in the same Recognizance by the Court here are discharged c. Tender of the body in execution after judgment had against the principall in discharge of his â—ureties M 9. Jac Rot 2739. H 10. J. Rot 3241. H. 22. J Rot. 2429 Errour brought T 20. Eliz. Rot. 125. Between Younger and Tompson Afterwards to wit such a day An. c. came here into the Court W. T. in his proper person and aswell for his owne proper indemnity as of his suerties aforesaid prayeth that he by the court here may be committed to the prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet by occasion of the judgment aforesaid there to stay untill c. And L. and T. Manucaptors of the said W of their Manucaptions and acknowledgment in this behalf made by the court here are fully discharged c. And afterwards Error was entred upon the Roll and the Record sent into the Kings Bench And after the end of the same it is
sheriff might have answered to the said Lord the King from the day of the receiving of the writ aforesaid untill the said day of the retorne thereof and the Inquisition which c The same Justices make appear here in S Mich. by their letters Sealed c. M 13. Jac. Rot. 2096. Brownlow Wiltes ss It was commandethe Justices of the Lord the King at the assize in the County aforesaid whereas the King had commanded the late sheriff of the county aforesaid as otherwise he had commanded him that he should distrain W. Dutton Knight late sheriff of the county aforesaid his predecessor by all his lands and chattles in his Bayliwick so that neither he nor any one for him put their hands upon them Entrey of a wâ—it to inquire de quantis exitiff c. See the statute Westmi 2.29 which granted this writ Hn. 13. E. 1. untill he shall have an other precept therein from the Lord the King and that he should answer of the issues of them to the said Lord the King so that he should have before the Justices of the said Lord the King there to wit at Westminster in Cr. S. Trinitatis last past the body of R. G. late of c. otherwise called R. G. c. which by the precept of the Lord the King he had lately taken as Fr. Popham Knight late sheriff of the county aforesaid predecessor of the sheriff now otherwise retorned to the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid to answer to W. Mariat of a plea that he should render unto him 30 l. which c. And to heare his judgment of more defaults c at which day the said now sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster aforesaid T. 18. Rot. 1674. retorneth that the said W. D. was distrained by his Chattells to the value of 66 s. and 8 d. where upon it was test fied in the Court of the King here on the behalf of the said W. M. that the said sheriff of greater issues to wit of 20 l. might have answered that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid in the presence of the said now sheriff if he will be present they should diligently inquire of what and how many issues of the lands and chattels of the said W. D P. 12. H 6. Rot. 2 a ve fac awarded to the Coroneâ—s to inquire de quantis exitibus besides the said 66 s. 8 d. in his bayliwick the now sheriff could have answered to the Lord the King c. from the day of the receiving of the said Writ untill the same day of the returne of the same And the said Inquisition which c. the said Justices of assize should make appeare here at this day to wit in 8. S. Mich. by their letters sealed and now here at this day came the said W. M. by Tho. P his attorney and the said Justices of assize to wit Laurance Tanfeild Kni. Cheife Baron of the Lord the King of his Exchequer and Henry Mountague one of the Serjeants at law of the said Lord the King assigned to take the assize in the county afaresaid The Justices of assizes â—â—toâ—ne into the bench an â—â—quisition taken by them now retorne here a certaine Inquisition at new Salisbury in the county aforesaid the 19. day of I. last past by vertue of the said writ by the oath of 12. c. taken by which it is found that the said W. D. Kni. late sheriff of the county of the said Cr. S. Tri. last past and long before had divers lands and chattells in the county aforesaid whereof the said now sheriff to wit H. M. from the day of the receiving of the said writ of Distring above mentioned untill the retorne of the same of twenty pounds in issues besides the 66 s. and 8. d. above might have answered to the said Lord the King to wit at L. in the county aforesaid Therefore it is considered that the said H. L. for his concealement in this behalfe in gui Sit. Mia of the Lord the King And that he answer the Lord the King of the said 20 l. whereof he besides the said 66 s. 8 d. of the lands and chattells of the said W. D. as aforesaid could have answered according to the Form of the statute in this case provided c. statute 13. E. 1. Cap. 39. A Wâ—it to enquire of damages awarded de novo where the Sheriff returned that he could not execute the old Writ for that some of the Iurors refused to take their Oath and a Capias awarded against them for contempt Capias awardeâ— P 20. H. 8. Rot. 461. At which day here came the said Plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid and the sheriff to wit W P. Knight now retorneth that he such a day and yeare last past caused to come before him at L. in the County aforesaid A. B. C. D. and others to inquire of and upon the premisses which said C. D. their corporall oath of and upon the premisses to performe or swear altogether refused and denied in manifest contempt of the Lord the King now and the lawes of his Kingdome So that execution of the said Writ he could not then do Therefore as before the sheriff was commanded that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid he diligently inquire what damages the said plaintiff sustained aswell by occasion of the entry aforesaid as for his costs c. and in as much c. he make appeare here such a day under the seale c. and Seales c. And also it is commanded to the said sheriff that he omit not for any liberty but that he take the said C. and D. if c. and safe c. so that they may have their bodies here at the said Terme to answer unto the Lord the King of the contempt aforesaid c. The same day is given to the said Plaintiff here c. Entry of a Writ of inquiry against an Attorney in Covenant LOndon ss Whereas Hugh Beeston Knight in our Court before our Justices at Westmin exhibited to our said Justices his certain bill against R. G. Gent. one of the attornies c. otherwise called R. G of Cliffords Inn London Gent. in a plea of covenant for that whereas the same Ricard by his certain Writing sealed with his seale and into our Court before our Justices brought made at London in the parish of St. Mary Bow in the ward of Cheape the 29. day of Nov. An. Dom. 1616. whose date is the same day and year acknowledged himself to have his custody two Fether beds 1. Bolster 4. Stooles covered with Scotish worke c. of the proper goods and chattles of the same Hugh Beeston which same Goods and Chattles after the delivery of them to the said Hugh were left in the custody of the said Richard And whereas
Barones of our Realm aforesaid coming to our Parliament and this to you and every of you who are interested therein we notifie witnesse our selves at Westminster c. And it ought to be written upon the back of the said writ as followeth It is inroled in the Bench in the Terme of S. Michael An. Regni R. H. 8. 18. Rot. 2. and ought to be Filed amongst the Records sine die c. See the old Book of entries fo 313. Title Errour in utlawry 20. Ms 31. H. 6. Rot. 309. H. 1. H 7. Rot. 305. A servant of a Knight in the Parliament impleaded in the Bench brought his writ here out of the Chancery testifying it and there upon the Justices Surcease and the servant goeth thereof without day c. Pardon Entry of the allowance of a uenerall pardon gpon an Utlary after judgment wherein it appeareth by the Record that the Pl. is satisfied of his debt and damages P. 3. â— Eliz rot 1131. tiel upon satisfaction given to the Executor after the death of the testator M 22 Jac rot 2781. e. Brownlow for Andrewes against Mason the like but note that the judgment was entred with Waller and the pardon was pleaded with Mr. Brownlow chief Prothonat ry H 44 Eliz. rot 2550. the like but more generall T 19. I. Rot. 1887. Midd. ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but that he should take F. T. late of c. Esq utlawed in London die lun prox pro fest c. Ano. Regni c. 3. at the Suit of F. W. in a Plea of debt wherof he is convicted and him safely c. so that he might have his body here at this day to wit tres Trinitatis c. to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider of him in this behalfe and now here at this day came the same F. T. By F. B. his attorney And saith that after the utlawry aforesaid against him the said Francis in Form aforesaid published and had by a certaine act in Parliament of the said Lord the King now held at Westminster in the county of Midd. 9. of February An. 7. amongst other things it was inacted and established by the authority of the same Parliament that all and singular the subjects of the said Lord the King aswell Spirituall as temporall of this Kingdom of England Walls Jsls of Jernesey and Garnsey and of the towne of Barwick their heires Successors executors administrators of them and every of them And all and singular Corporations or Towns incorporate Cities Burroughs Counties Ridings Hundreds Lath Rape Wapentacks Townes Uillages Hamlets and Tithings and every of them and the Successors of them and every of them by authority of the same Parliament should be acquitted pardoned released and discharged against the same Lord the King his heires and Successors and every of them from all Treasons and Felonies Offences contempts Trespasses entries injuries deceipts c. As in the Act and the same Francis Tunstall saith that the utlawry aforesaid against the same F. in Forme aforesaid published and had is not excepted and foreprised in the Act aforesaid and that he is and at the time of the making of the Act aforesaid long before was a subject and Leige man of the same Lord the King now borne under his obedience to wit at Westminster aforesaid in the said County of Midd. And that he satisfied to the said Francis Waswell for the said debt of 401 l. which the same Francis White in the court of the said Lord the King here recovered against him as of the said 36 s. which to the same Francis White in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by the occasion of the detayning of the said debt as it appeareth in the Term of S. Hillary An. Rs. nunc 2. Rot 1846. For which said debt and damages the same Francis Tunstal was at the suit of the said Francis White in Form aforesad utlawed and this he is ready to verifie where When and as the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider c. Therefore it is not intended that the Lord the King now will impeach or charge the same Francis Tunstall by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid whereupon he Prayeth judgment and that he may be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid And because by upon inspection of the record of the same Terme of S. Hillary An. 2. abovesaid It sufficiently appeareth to the said justices upon Record that the same Francis White is satisfied of the debt and damages aforesaid Therefore the same generall pardon is allowed to the same Francis Tunstall And the same Francis may goe thereof without day c. P 32. Eliz. Rot. 1131. Scot. Essex Entrey of speciall pardon of an utlawry after satisfaction of the judgment Note Note that the defendant came there by a Cepi Corpus and is committed to the Fleet And then he pleads the pardon and the satisfact on and prayeth that the pardon may be allowed and he set at larg and it was don P 44. Eliz Rot. 1539. H. 19. Eliz. Rot. 424. Tiel H 8. Iac. Rot. Brownlow London ss R. T. utlawed An. 34 Eliz. Whereof he is convicted at the suit of G. At 8. Pardon and release of demands pleaded in the discharge of an Expostat Pur. commeth and pleadeth the pardon de 39. Eliz. and sets forth that the utlawry is not excepted c. And that he is a Subiect c. And that the same Edw. after the utlawry aforesaid against the said R. in Form aforesaid published and had to wit 30. Jan. An. 37. Eliz. released all demands to the Defendant as by the said writing more fully appeareth and th s he is ready to verifie c. vnde non intendit Dom. Rex c. But because it is not knowne whether the writing of the release aforesaid by the same R. above pretended be the deed of the said Edward or not And because it is expedient and necessary that the said Ed. for his interest in this behalfe be premonished before it be further proceeded in to discharg the same R. from the utlawry aforesaid according to the Form of the Act aforesaid the sheriff is commanded that by the honest Sci. fac awarded c. they make known to the said Ed. c. 15 Pas to acknowledg or gainesay the writing of release aforesaid and also to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said Rob. ought not to be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid if c. M 18. Jac. Rot. Brownlow Sussex ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas Walter Covert Knight was summoned to be in the Court of the Lord the King now here to answer Ed Culpeper Knight of a plea wherefore Entry of a writ to make partition and partition made therupon and judgment therein whereas the same Ed. and Walter
of his County Palatine of Lancaster upon Munday in Quarta sepquadrag next coming to answer there in his plea aforesaid if c. ss BE it remembred That T. E Knight H 25 H 8 rot 121. Remissio recordi sent by the Justices of Chester into the Bench to determine a forraign voucher and at a day in the Bench the Tenants make default and the cause for that was determined Iustice of the Lord the King of Chester the twenty third of J that same Term by vertue of a writ of the Lord the King to him directed which followeth in these words Henry the eighth by the Grace of God King of England and France and Lord of Ireland to his Iustice of Chester or to the Keeper of his place there greeting Whereas T T in our Court in our County aforesaid had demanded against R. B. Esquire T.W. and P. A. one windmill one water-mill c with the Appurtenances in N as his right and inheritance and into which the same R. T.W and P. had to entrance unlesse after the Demise which R.T. Knight kinsman of the sayd T. T whose heir he is thereof made to R. S. for a Terme which is past and which after that Terme ought to revert to the said T. T. and the same R.T. and P. pleading in the same Court lately vouched thereof to warranty P.B. summoned in our County of Wilts by the ayd of our court of Chester because the same P. B. had no lands within our County of Chester aforesaid by which he could be summoned which said Warranty in our said Court of Chester for the cause aforesaid cannot be determined to the great Damage of the said T.T. and manifest hinderance of the obtaining of his Right whereupon he hath besought us to provide him a fit remedy in this behalfe We who are Debtors to exhibit Iustice to every one within our Kingdome willing to do what is just to the said T.T. in this behalfe Command you that if it be so far proceeded in our Court of Chester then the Record and proceedings therein with all things touching the same to our Iustices of the Bench under your seal you distinctly and openly send and this Writ so that they may have them at Westminster in Octab. Hil. prefixing the same day to the parties aforesaid that they may be then there to do and receive what shall be considered in our Court there in this behalfe that that warranty being determined before our said Iustices in the Common Bench the said Record and proceedings may be sent you to proceed in the plaint aforesaid as of right and according to the Law and Custome of our County of Chester is to be done witnesse our self at Westminster 6 November Anno c. 25 ANd the said Iustice sent there the Record and proceedings of the said plaint whereof mention is made in the sayd Writ annexed to the same Writ the Tenor whereof followeth in these words Pleas of the County of Chester at Chester before T. E. Knight Justice of the Lord the King upon Thursday next after the Feast of Saint Iames the Apostle Anno H. 8. post Conquest of England 25. Count in Entre ad term qui pret in the County Palatine of Chester CHester ss Thomas Torhet by H. H. his Attorney in the Court of the Lord the King here demandeth against R B. Esquire T W. and P A one wind mill c. with the appurtenances in N. as his right and inheritance and into which the same R T. W. and P. have no entrance unlesse after the demise which Robert S. Knight Kinsman of the said T T. whose heir he is thereof made to R. Scot for a Terme which is past and which after that Term ought to revert to the same T. T. whereupon he saith that the said Robert kinsman c. was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee in the time of peace in the time of Edward late King of England the second after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the value c. and the same Robert being so thereof seised demised those Tenements with the Appurtenances to the said Richard Scot for a Terme which is past and from the same Robert the right descended c. to one Robert as son and heire c. and from the said Robert the son the right descended to one Thomas as son and heir c. and by many descents the right came to Iohn and from the said Iohn the right came to the said Thomas who is now Demandant as son and heir c. And which after that Terme c and thereof bringeth suit c. And the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. by T. B. their Attorney come and defend their right when c. and pray licence thereof to imparl here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast c next coming and have it c. The same day is given to the said T. T. here c. At which day here came as well the said T. T. by his Attorney aforesaid as the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. by their Attorney here c. and hereupon the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. vouch thereof to warrant P. B. who hath no Lands or Tenements in the County of Chester but all in the County of Wilts and prayeth that the said Peter may be summoned in the County of Wilts A forraigner vouched to warrant by ayde c. and the said T. T. well alloweth the said vouchee c. let him have it c. And because their vouchee to warrant cannot be determined in the said County of Chester day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the feast of the Translation of Saint Edw. next coming c. And in the mean time the writ of the Lord the King may be followed if c. At which day further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast of Saint Martin the Bishop next coming c. And in the mean time c. At which day a further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast c. And further the said Justice C to the Justices of the Common Bench here to wit at W aforesaid returneth That he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed prefixed a day to the parties aforesaid at the said Oct. Hil. that they should be here to do and receive as that Writ in it selfe commandeth and requireth At which said Octab. Hill before the said Iustices of the Bench here to wit at Westminster aforesaid Remandment of the plaint came the same T. T. by R. Jenour his Attorney and offered himself the fourth day against the said R. B. T. W. and P. A. in the plea aforesaid and
Plaintiff and Defendant come by attorny And there upon the same David prayeth execution against the same John for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowedged to be levyed of his lands and Chattles and against the same Bartholomew for the said 20 l. c. and so against the rest severally And the same I. B. W. and H. pray liberty to imparle untill Cr. Tri. and have it c. The same day is given to the same David here c. Execution prayed severally PAsch 9. Jac. Roll 349. Walter Devon ss It was commanded the sheriff because in the record and proceedings Scire facias after a judgment reversed in a writ of false judgment upon a Record in Detinue and also in commencing of a certain plaint which was in the hundred of N. C. Esquire of N. without writ of the Lord the King between I. C. W. H. in a plea of detinue of corne which the same I. C. demanded of the same W. a writ of false judgment was given against him in the said plaint as the King is informed by the grievious complaint of the said William and as by the inspection of the Record proceedings in the cause aforesaid which the said Lord the King now caused to be brought before his Justices at Westminster sufficiently appeareth that false judgment was given against the same William in the plaint aforesaid For which in the Court of the Lord the King now here before his said Justices it was considered that the judgment aforesaid should be revoked nulled and altogether taken for nothing Judgment reversed And that the same William should be restored to all things which he had lost by occasion of the judgment aforesaid Notwithstanding because the said Io. Clerk after the judgment aforesaid in the hundred aforesaid given and by force thereof and pretence of a certaine judiciall precept issuing out of the hundred caused to be don and levyed upon one Cow of the same Willam 39 s. 11 d. for the value of the said Corne to wit for eight bushels of Rye and 12 d to the same Iohn for his costs and charges which he had and sustained by the occasion of the detention of the corne aforesaid in the hundred aforesaid adjudged And thereupon the said Cow was sold by which occasion the said Iohn Clark of the said 39 s. 11 d. for the value of the said corne and of the said 12 d. for his costs and charges aforesaid in the hundred aforesaid by vertue of the judgment aforesaid recovered was and is satisfied as by the relation and information of the said William the Lord the King is informed and understands And because c. that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said I. C. that he should be here at this day to wit Men. Pas to shew if any thing c. Wherefore the Cow aforesaid or the value of the same or the said 10 s and 11 d. in Form aforesaid recovered Scire facias to have restitution ought not to be restored and repayd unto the said William according to the Form and effect of the said judgment in the said Court of the said Lord the King now in Form aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same W. H. by R. S. his attorney and offered himselfe the 4 th day against the said I. C. in the plea aforsaid and he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he hath nothing Alias Sci. fac awarded c. nor is to be found c. Therefore as before it was commanded the sheriff that by honest men c. he shall make known to the said I. C. that he be here in Cr. Trin. to shew in Form aforesaid c. PAas 13. Jac Rot. 774. Brownlow Civit. Covent ss It was commanded the Coroners of the City aforesaid whereas the King had commanded the late sheriff of the City aforesaid that of the lands and chattls of H. L. late of D. in the county of Cest Gent. in their bayliwick they would cause to be made aswell a certaine debt of 150. Scire facias directed to the Coroners and Sheriffs both to levy a certaine debt upon a fi fac and not payed to the party at the returne of the fi fac l. which H S. in the Court of the King here to wit at Westminster recovered against him as 30 s. which to the same H. in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detayning of that debt and that they should have those monies before the Justices here to wit at Westminster 15. Marti last past to render to the said Humphery for his debt and damages aforesaid whereof he is convicted at which day here to wit at Westminster aforesaid came the same H. by G. B. his attorney and the sheriffes to wit T. L. and I. B. then retorned that they by vertue of the said writ to them directed of the Chattles of the said H. have caused to be made 125 l. parcell of the debt and damages aforesaid which said 125 l. here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at that day they have ready notwithstanding the same sheriffs the said 125 l. had not here in Court of the Lord the King at that day nor have satisfied the same Humphry for the said 125 l. as by the information of the said H. to the King was made known and because c. that by honest and c. they should make knowne to the same T. and I that they should be here at this day to wit 15. Pas to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same H execution against them for the said 125 l. by them in Form aforesaid levyed ought not to have c. if c. And now here at this day commeth the said H. by his attorney aforesaid and offered himself the 4 th day against the said T. and I. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not and the Coroner to wit W. F. now retorneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed by F. N. and T. W. honest c. made known to the same T. and I. to be here at this day to shew in Form aforesaid c therefore it is considered that the said H. have execution against the same T. and I. for the same 125l by them in Form aforesaid levyed by default c. LOndon ss Pasch 11. Jac. Rot. 620. The entry of a Sci. fac upon a generall pardon Capias ut lagat Brownlow ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should not omit for any liberty within their Bayliwick but that they should take H. H late c. otherwise called c. utlawed in London next before the Feast of St. Dunston the Bpp. An. primo c at the suit of G. E. in a plea of debt if c. and him in safty c. so
that they should have his body here at this day to wit 15. Pas to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider of him in that behalf and now here at this day cometh the said Henry by W. C his attorney and sayeth that after the utlawry aforesaid against the said Henry had and published by a certain Act in Parliament of the said Lord the King now by continuance held at Westminster in the county of Midd. the 9 th day of Febru in the seventh yeare of the Lord the King now amongst other things it is inacted established by authory of the same Parliament that all and singular subjects of the said Lord the King aswell spirituall as temporall of this kingdom of England Wales the Islands of I. and G. and the Towne of Barwick the heires successors executors and administrators Pardon pleaded of them and every of them and all and singular corporations in any wise incorporated Cities Borroughs Counties Rideings c. and every of them And the Successor and Successors of them and every of them by the authority of the same Parliament should be acquitted pardoned released and discharged against the said Lord the King his heires and successors and every of them of all Treasons Felonyes offences contempts Trespasses entries injuries deceipts misdemeanors penalties Summes of monies Punnishment by death corporall punishments and pecuniary and generally from all other things causes complâ—ints suits judgments and Executions in the statute aforesaid not excepted nor Foreprised which by the said Lord the King by any meanes or in any other manner could be pardoned before and untill the 9. day of November then last past before the making of the said Act to every or any of his subjects Corporations incorporat Cities Burroughs c. or any of them yet so notwithstanding that every person utlawed shall prosecute his writ of Scire Facias against such party or parties at his or at whose Suit he or they were utlawed before the pardon in such case be allowed to the party utlawed as in the same Act is more fully contayned and the said Henry further saith that the utlawry aforesaid is not excepted nor Foreprised in the same statute Averment that the Utlary is not Averment that he is a Subject and that he is and at the time of the making of the said Act and long before was a subject and leige man of the said Lord the King now born under his obedience to wit at London in the parish c. and this he is ready to verifie where when and how the Court of the Lord the King now shall consider thereof whereupon it is not intended that the said Lord the King will impeach the said Henry by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment that he may be discharged from the said utlawry and because it is expedient and there is a necessity that the same Griffin should be premonished for his interest in this behalfe before the discharging of the same Henry from the utlawry aforesaid be further proceeded in according to the Form of the staute aforesaid The sheriffs are commanded that by honest c. they make knowne to the same G. that he be here in Cr. Ascen Dom. to prosecute against the same Henry his plea aforesaid if c. at which day came the same Henry by his attorney aforesaid and the sheriffs Sci fac awarded Sheriffs returne Sci fac Mercy to wit E. R. and A. P. now retorne that they by vertue of the writ aforesaid to them directed by I. W. and R. G. honest c. made knowne to the same G. of being here to this day to prosecute in Form aforesaid he the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called came not nor any whit further prosecute his said Writ therefore he and his pledges are thereof in mercy let the names of the pledges be inquired of And that the said Henry goe thereof without day Generall Pardon allowed c. and that the generall pardon aforesaid be allowed him c. Count in debt upon a Sci fac upon the generall pardon PAsch 12. Iac. Rot. Brownelow retorn Mense Pas to follow in Form aforesaid c. and now here at this day to wit Mens Pas came aswell the said William by his attorny aforesaid as the said Tho. by R. D. his a torny and the sheriffs as before now retorneth here that he hath nothing c. nor is to be found c. And hereupon the same Tho. declaring against the said Will upon his originall writ in the plea aforesaid said that the said W. had not rendred to the said T. 20 l. which to him he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. for that to wit that whereas the said W. the 20. day of Octo. An. c 3. at London in the parish and ward aforesaid by this certaine writing obligatory granted c. M 1. and 2. Eliz. Rot 1248 in a Scire facias against B. and A. upon a Recognizance one of the defendants is alleaged to be dead and one other processe against him and the others prayeth imparlance ss THe sheriff was commanded whereas R. C. and I. his wife in the Court of the King here had recovered against I. H Sci fac against a Tenant by Elegit and part of the monie levied the Tenant against whom the execution was brings the residue and a redelivery awarded 68 s. for their damages which they had by occasion of the detaining of the dower of the same I. of the Tenements in N. of the indowment of I Son of I. H. her late husband as by a certaine Jury of the country before the Justices of the King assigned to take the assize in the county aforesaid such a day and yeare at Wigo thereof between them Summoned and taken was convicted and the same R and I. came afterwards into the court of the Lord the King here and chose to be delivered to them all the goods and Chattles of the said I. H. besides the Oxen and Cattles of the Plough and likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in his Bayliwick to hold as their free Tenements to them and their assignes accor to the Form of the statute in such case provided untill 68 s. for the damages aforesaid should be thereof levyed whereupon the King commanded them that al the goods and chattles of the said I. H. besides his oxen Cattle of the Plough and likewise the moyety of his lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick without delay you cause to be delivered to the same R. and C. by the resonable price and extent to hold to them and their assignes as their Free Tenement in Forme aforesaid untill 68 s. for their damages aforesaid should be thereof Levyed and in what sort Elegit awarded Return of the Elegit c. should be made Known here such a day c. the same sheriff to the justices of the King
Jac. Rot. 1510. It is thus contayned Mid. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas G. B. of Cobham in the County of Surry gent. had prosecuted a certaine Writ of the Lord the King of Audita querela to the Justices of the Lord the King here directed against one I. D. Doctor of the Lawes upon a certain judgment in the Court of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench here given for the same Iohn against the said O. given aswell of a certaine debt of 200 l. as of 33 s. and 4. d. for his damages which the same I. had by occasion of detayning of that debt by the same Iohn against the said O. in the same court of the said Lord the King here rccovered and the same O thereupon afterwards to wit the 29. day of May An. Rs. c. 7. out of the same Court had obtayned a certaine writ of the said Lord the King directed to the sheriff of Suss against the same Iohn to premonish the said Iohn of being before the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster such a retorn the next following to answer to the said writ of Audita querele And further to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King shall consider of him in that behalf and whereas also afterwards to wit the said 29. day of May An 7. abovesaid in the same Court before the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westminster came E. M. of c. G. M. of c. T. W. of c. and R. E. and undertook and every of them did undertake for the same O. in the summe of 200 l. and the same O then present in the same Court undertook for himselfe in the summe of 500 l. to prosecute the said writ of Audita querela with effect and if it shall happen judgment against the said O. in this behalfe to be given that then the same O. should satisfie to the same I. of the debt and damages aforesaid in the same Court recorded which said summe of 500 l. the said Owen acknowledgeth of his Lands and Chattles to be made and to be levied to the use and behoofe of the said Iohn And which said severall sumes of 200 l. every of the Mnucaptors aforesaid acknowledge of their Lands and Chattles and every of them to be made if it should happen the said Owing to make default in any of the premisses and thereof to be lawfully convicted and although afterwards to wit in the morrow of the holy Trinity An. Rs. c. 8. after the appearance of the said Iohn to the writ aforesaid made in the Court of the said Lord the King before his Justices here to wit at Westminster by the judgment of the same Court it was considered that the said Owing shall take nothing by the said writ aforesaid but should be in mercy for his false clamor therein And that the said Iohn should goe therein without day c. and prosecute for his execution if to him it should seem expedient Neverthelesse the said Owing of the said 200 l. of the debt aforesaid the said 33 s. and 4 d. for the damages aforesaid hath not satisfied to the said Iohn neither the said Owing the said 500 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to the said Iohn hitherto hath not paid nor the same Edmond George Thomas Robert or any of them the said 200 l. by them severaly in Form aforesaid acknowledged of their lands and chattles to the same I. D hitherto hath paid as by the information of the said Iohn the King understandeth And because c that by honest c. he make knowne to the said O. E. G. T. and Rob that they should be here at this day to wit 15 Pas to shew if any thing c. to wit the same O wherefore the same 500 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his lands and chattles and the same E G. T. and R. wherefore the same 200 l. by them severally in Form aforesaid acknowledged of their Lands and Chattles ought not to be made and rendred to the said Iohn according to the Forme of the acknowledgment aforesaid if c. At which day here came the said John by I N his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the same O. E. G. T. and R. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c. Therefore as before it was commanded the sheriff that by honest c he should make knowne to the said O. E. G. T. and R. that they should be here 15 Pas to shew in Form aforesaid c. At which day here came aswell the same Iohn by his Attorney aforesaid as the said O. E. G. T. and R. by Oth. Gager their Attorney and the sheriff as before retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are to be found c. And hereupon the same Iohn prayeth execution against the said Owin of the said 500 l. by the same O. in Form aforesaid acknowledged and against the same Edmond for the same 200 l. by the same E. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and against the said George for the said 200 l. by the same George in Form aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Thomas of the said 200 l. by the same Thomas in Form aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Robert of the said 200 l. by the same Robert in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. and the same O E. G T. and R. praylicence to imparle and have it c. At which day came here aswell the said Iohn as the said O. E. G. T. and R. by their attornies aforesaid and hereupon the same Iohn as before prayeth judgment and execution against the said O. E. G. T. and R. of the said severall summes by them in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. And the same attorney of the said O. E G T. and R. saith that he is not informed c. therefore it is considered that the same I. D. have execution against the same O for the said 500 l. by the same O. in Form aforesaid acknowledged and against the said Ed. for the said 200 l. by the same E in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and against the said George for the said 200 l. by him in Forme acknowledged And against the said Thomas for the said 200 l. by the same Thomas in Forme aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Robert for the said 200 l. by the same Robert in Form aforesaid acknowledged c. T 10. Jac. Rot. 338 Walter Staff ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of a speciall writ of Scire facias where the lands are extended for the Pâ— but the sheriff saith that he extended the same Lands upon an other Elegit and delivered them to the party and that he cannot deliver them to the pâ— now
and not found in his bayliwick as by the record and proceedings therein in the same court of the Lord the King before the Justices of the same Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid remayning manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon and the same I. H Gent. is dead as by the information of Robert Broundling Esq Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of the same I H. at the time of his death during the minority of W. H. and R H. Executors of the Testament of the said I. H. Gent. the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. be should make knowne to the said I. H. Knight that he should be here at this day to wit 15. Pas to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Robert ought not to have Execution against him of the debt aforesaid ought not to have c. according to the form of the acknowledgement aforesaid c. now here at this day came the same Rob. by I. Gill his attorney and offered himself the fourth day against I. H Knight in the plea aforesaid and he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff to wit Henry Chapman now retorneth that the said I. H. Knight hath nothing c. nor is found c. And hereupon the same R. saith that after the said 15. Pas last past the same I. H. Gent. at the Towne of New-Castell upon Tyne made his last will and Testament the same William H. and Ralph his Sons being then within the age of 17. yeares Executors of the same Testament made and ordayned And that the Administrators of all the goods and Chattles which were of the said I H. Gent. at the time of his death during the minority of the same William and Ralph by Clement Colmor c. The 19. day of November in the yeare of our Lord 1613. at the Towne of New Castell upon Tyne after the death of the said I. H. Gent to the same Robert was committed And he bringeth here into Court aswell the letters Testamentary of the same I. H. Gent. by which it sufficiently appeareth to the Court here the same William and Ralph to be Executors of the Testament aforesaid And thereof to have the administration As the letters administratory of the said officiall which the Commission of the administration aforesaid in Form aforesaid do testifie whose date are the same 19 day of November An. Do. 1613. abovesaid with this that the said Robert will verifie that the same William and Ralph are yet living to wit at the Towne of New-Castell upon Tyne and are within the age of 17. yeares and hereupon the same Robert payeth execution against the same I. H. Knight of the Debt aforesaid by default c. and hereupon the same Robert prayeth a writ of the Lord the King by the statute c. to the Reverend Father in Christ William Bishop of Durham or keeper of his place there to be directed And it is granted him retornable here in Cr. S. Trin c. ss BRownlow ss Whereas A. M Gent. and W. H. late of Entry of a Sci fac against manucaptors c. Gent. at an other time to wit 29 day of June An. 21. before Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet our Cheife Justices of the common bench at his Chamber in Serjeants Inne Fleetstreet London undertook and each of them did undertake to wit the same A. in the summe of 160 l. And the same W. in the summe of 80 l. that he the same A. should appeare in our Court before our Justices at Westminster in his proper person or by his sufficient attorney in Law to an action or writ of one R. S. against the same Arthur of and upon an action of debt upon demand of 80 l. before 8. Mich. then next to come to be commenced and in our said Court before our Justices at Westminster to be prosecuted and to answer to the same Richard in the plea aforesaid And also it should happen judgment after the appearance of the said A. in the Cour here made in in the same plea for the said Richard against the same A. to be given to satisfie to the said Richard of the debt and damages for the same Richard against the same A in the same Court in the plea aforesaid to be recovered or adjudged or that he the same A upon that occasion should render himselfe to the prison of the Fleet Which said summe of 160 l. the same A acknowledgeth to be made of their lands and chattles which said 80 l. the same W. acknowledgeth to be made of his lands and Chattles to be levied to the use and behoof of the said Richard if it should happen the said A. to make default in any of the premisses and thereof lawfully to be convicted which said Recognizance in Form aforesaid taken The said Cheife Justice afterwards to wit the 30 day of June then next following in our said Court with his owne hands and delivered to be inroled upon Record and now there before our Justices of the common Bench aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid in the Terme of the holy Trinity An. 21. abovesaid is inroled of which said plea of Debt a certain plaint before them was levied in our Court before Iohn Hodges Esq then being one of the sheriffs of London and the same plaint by our Writ upon our Command before our Chief Justice at his Chamber aforesaid was sent and had As by the record and proceedings therein in our said Court before our said Justices at Westminster remayning manifestly appeareth And although the same Richard before the said Oct. S. Mich. to wit the 17. day of September An. c. 21. abovesaid our certaine originall Writ in a plea of debt of 80 l. against the same A. out of our Chancery at Westminster aforesaid then being before our Justices of the Common Bench at Westminster aforesaid Oct. S. Mich. then next following retornable Commenced and the same A. at the said 8. S. Mich. by I. R. then his Attorney to the said Writ in Debt aforesaid as by the same Richard against the same A. in Forme aforesaid commenced according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid appeared And afterwards to wit in 8. S. Hill then next following the same A. aswell of the said Debt of 80 l. aforesaid as in 7 l. which to the same Richard in our said Court were adjudged for his Damages which he had by the occasion of the detayning of that Debt whereof he was convicted and judgment there against the same A. for the same Richard in the same plea in our Court aforesaid was given as by the Record and proceedings therein in the same Court before our Justices at Westminster remayning manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse the same A. hath not rendred his body in execution of the Judgment aforesaid in our said Court at the said Oct. S. Hill nor satisfied the said Richard for the
the cattell fi st taken you make known to our Iustices at Westminster 15 Michaelis last past and that you put by sureties and safe pledges the same I that hee should be before our Iustices at Westminster at the said 15 sancti Michaelis to answer to the said W. and T. of the taking of the cattell aforesaid and in the mean time if you could to replevy to the same W and T their cattell aforesaid and afterwards for that it seemed to our said Iustices at VVestminster for certain causes propounded before them and them specially moving that our Writ aforesaid Quoad Cap. in VVith The writ of cap. in Withernam inconsulte emanavit therefore a Supersedeas is therein awarded The cattell of the Defendant taken and and delivered to the pl intiff in withe n. before the delivery of the sup and that he by force of the supersed cannot redeliver them for that they were eloyned Withernam post Withernam The cattell taken in Withernam eloyned before the reception of the Writ of Sup. Plur. cap. in Withernam for the Def. with a writ in the mean time to deliver the cattell first taken in Withernam of the cattel of the said I for the cattell of the said VV and T by him taken before improvisely issued out of our Court aforesaid by another Writ we have commanded you that of any cattell of the said I to be taken in VVithernam for the same cattell of the said W and T by him before taken you be altogether superseded and if you shall have taken any of the cattell of the said I in VVithernam by occasion of the premisses then you shall redeliver them to the said I without delay and inasmuch as you shall execute this our precept you shall make appear to our Justices at Westminster at the said 15 Michaelis and then our said Justices at VVestminster at the said 15 Mich. returnest that by vertue of the said Writ De Capiend in VVithernam to you before directed to wit such a day and year abovesaid of the cattell of the said I. L. four Cowes c. to the value of the said cattell of the said W. and T which I took thou have in VVithernam and that afterwards such a day and year abovesaid our said Writ of Supersedeas was delivered thereof to you and at the same 15 sancti Michaelis you certified to our Justices at Westminster that the cattell of the same I in Forme aforesaid taken in Withernam and delivered to the same W and T. you could not redeliver to the said I after the coming of the said Writ of Supersedeas according to the Tenor of the said writ of Supersedeas for that the same cattell were eloyned and yet are eloyned and transmitted by the same W. and T. to places to you unknown so that by no meanes you could have sight of the sayd cattell after the coming of the said Writ of Supersedeas and therefore we command you as more times we have commanded you that of the cattell of the said W and T in your Bailiwick to the value of the said cattell of the said I taken in Withernam you take in Withernam and deliver them to the said I to be kept untill the said cattell of the said I. taken in Withernam you can redeliver to the same I. And inasmuch as you shall execute this our precept you make to appeare to our Justices at Westminster such a day and in the mean time if you can to make redelivery to the said I of the cattell aforesaid first taken in Withernam and have there this writ Teste c. Entry of a Sup. to an Exigent and pledges de novo after the retorn of a nichil upon a cap. in Withernam awarded after averia Elongata retorned af er nonsuit of the plaintiff and before declaration in replevin T 3. Jac. rot 612. Brownlow Cornub. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas I. H. and O. R. were summoned to be in the Court of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster to answer I. K. Esq of a plea wherefore they took a certaine Cow of the same I. K. and her unjustly kept against sureties and pledges c. the same I. K. afterwards in the same Court of the Lord the King here to wit at VVestminster aforesaid made default whereupon it was then considered in the said Court of the Lord the King here that the same I. K. and his pledges to prosecute should be in mercy and that the said I. H. and O. should goe thereof without day c. And that they should have retorne of the Cow aforesaid whereupon it was commanded the sheriff that without delay he should retorne the Cow aforesaid to the said I. H. and O. And her at the complaint of the said should not deliver without a writ of the said Lord the King which should make expresse mention of the judgment aforesaid Reto habend awarded and in asmuch c. he should make appeare here 15. Pas last past at which day the sheriff retorned to the Justices here that before the comming of the writ aforesaid the said Cow was cloyned by the said I. K. to places to him altogether unknowne whereby he could not retorne the Cow aforesaid to the said I. H. and O. as by the said Writ it was commanded him vacca elongata retorned c. whereupon it was commanded the sheriff that of the Cattle of the said I. K. to the value of the Cow aforesaid before taken he should take in VVithernam and should deliver them to the said I. H and O. to hold to them untill he could retorne the Cow aforesaid before taken Capias in Withernam awarded Cap as for the contempt and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges the said I. K that he should be here in 15. Trin. in the second yeare of the Lord the King now to answer aswell the said Lord the King now of the contempt Nichil habet that the sheriff could take in Withernam As to the said I. H and O. of the injuries to them in this behalfe offered and that he should have here the names of the pledges and that writ at which day the sheriff retorned to the justices here that the said I. K. had no Cow in his bayliwick which he could take in VVithernam Qâ—ere if good because the Capias is not awarded before the Exigent Exigent awarded nor had any thing in his Bayliwick by which he could be attached whereby as more times the sheriff was commanded that he put in exigent the same I. K. from county to county untill c. he should be utlawed if not c and if c. then he should take him and safely c. so that he should have his body here 15. Trin. aswell to answer to the said Lord the King of the contempt as to the said I. H. O of the damage and injuries to
him in this behalfe done and that he should have here that writ The Nonsuant prayeth to be admitted to his fine for the conâ—empt and the fine was assessed and now here at this day to wit the said 15. Trin. came aswell the said I. K. and T. R. his attorney as the same I. H. and O. by I. H. their attorney And hereupon the said I. K. prayeth himselfe to be admitted to make a fine with the said Lord the King by occasion of the premisses and is admitted c. and is fined by the Justices here at 2 s. 6 d. which by the command of the Justices of the Court here he paid to R. B. Cheife Prothonotary of the Court of the said Lord the King of the bench here for necessary reparations in the Court here done and to be done Fine payed c. Therefore the same I. K. goe thereof without day c. whereupon the same I. K by the statute A writ de Sâ—ccuda deliberatione prayed Pledges de novo Recognizance c. prayeth a writ of the said Lord the King de Secunda Delib and it is granted to him retornable here in Oct. Mi. c. And also the said I. K. in the same court here found pledges de novo aswell to prosecute his Claime as of the Cow aforesaid before taken to be retorned to the said I. H. and O. if retorne thereof should be adjudged to wit T R. of O. c. and I D of c. each of them under the penalty of 100 s. whereupon it was commanded the sheriff that of the said I K. further putting in Exigent utlawing Super sedias awarded upon the Exigent taking or in anything molesting by occasion of the premisses he be altogether superseded c. M 18. H. 8. rot 2. The Lord the King sent to his Justices of the Bench here his writ closed in these words Henry by the grace of God Supersedeas out of the Kings Bench to discharge sureties of peace in the Common Bench because he found security of peace in the Kings Bench. to Robert Brudenell Knight and his associats our Justices of the Common Bench greeting because Thomas Travers of W. in the County of Essex Clerke came into our court before us at Westminster this instant day of Thursday next after 15. daies of S. Iohn the Beptist in his proper person And then found there sufficient securitie that he should personally appeare before us in 15. Pas next to come wheresoever we should then be in England And that in the meane time he should carry himself peaceably towards and all our people and that he would not bring nor cause to be brought by himself or any other in his name any Damage or grievance to any of our people upon their bodies by treachery assault or any other meanes which may in any manner give way to the infringement disturbance of the peace as in our court before us is fully manifest upon Record Therefore we command you that from compelling the said Tho. Travers to find any securitie for our peace or for any of our people before you or any of you untill after the same 15. Pas you are altogether superseded T. I. fifty James at Westminster the 11. day of July An. c. 18. and now to wit in 8. S. Mich. that same Terme came here the same Thomas in his proper person whereupon the same Thomas by the same Justices here is altogether dismissed and discharged from finding of any other securitie further in this behalfe c. Charles c. To the sheriff of L. greeting A Supersedeas after a Fi. fac ne venditioni exponas whereas of late we did command you that of the goods and Chattles of T. E. late of c. being in your bayliwick you should cause to be levied 161. 5 s. which D. I. in the Court c. had recovered against him for her Damages which she had sustained by reason of a certaine trespasse upon the case by the aforesaid T. to the said D. done whereof he is convicted as by the Record c. it manifestly appeareth And that you should have those moneyes which you had so levied before c. at VVestminster aforesaid such a return to render to the said D. in that behalfe as in that Writ is more fully contayned and you at that day did retorne to the Barons of our said Exchequer at VVestminster aforesaid that you had levied of the goods of the said T. to the value of the summe abovementioned which goods did remaine in youre hands unsold for want of buyers but because the said Writ of Scire facias to you as above directed did unduely issue forth Therefore we command you that from selling of the goods aforesaid or any part thereof by vertue of the said Writ of Scire fac you altogether forbeare as you will answer the contrary at your peril witnesse c Ventre Inspiciendo Entry of a writ de ventre inspiciendo see Bracton fo 69. H and E terms A. 5. H. 3. rot in the common Bench Norff. ss Peter de Meanton hath requested that Muriell who was the wife of VV. de Meanton who maketh her selfe not not to be with child by the same VV. her husband was not with child for this cause maketh herselfe not with child to disinherit the same Pet whereupon at the petition of the same Muriell it was commanded the sheriff that by lawâ—ull women they should make diligent inquiry whether she was with child or not And Inquisition was made and sent to VVestminster but in the interim came she before the Justices of the Bench and offered her selfe and shewed to them that she was with child and this she offered to shew and prayed that it might be seene by the command of the Justices by 14. lawfull gentle women of London to be chosen by the Mayor and sheriffs of London and it seemed to them that she was with Child so that it was said to her that she might goe therein without day untill any one should complaine thereof but afterwards came the same Peter and offered himselfe and again said that she was not pregnant of his brother so that upon his complaint she was againe resummoned and questioned when her husband dyed and at what time he departed from her said that in truth he departed from her upon VVednesday next after the Feast of the holy Trinity and that he died on the day of the Appostles Peter and Paule so that after that same Wednesday she never saw him and Peter acknowledgeth this same said well she was not with child with his brother prayed that she might be committed to custody so that by the counsell of the court she was committed to the Mayor of L. into custody and 4 lawfull gentle-women were assigned to see her often and to keep her But afterwards came the same Peter and shewed that the Terme of bringing forth if she had beene