place Exod. 31. ver 13. where God saith Uerily my Sabbaths yee shall keep for it is a signe betweene me and you throughout your generations that yee may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie you And for more ample declaration in the Verses following 14. 15 16 17. he expounds those Sabbaths of the weekely Sabbath only Although this were not so whosoever speaketh of Sabbaths in the number of multitude and maketh no exception understandeth whatsoever is contained in the signification of that word and hath the same denomination Verily when the Apostle saith that no man should condemne us in distinction of an Holy day or of Sabbaths if he had not understood all Sabbaths but had beleeved that God hath expresly ordained under the New Testament as hee did under the old a day to be for his service a day of festivity and of Sabbath he was bound to except it particularly and by name and so to keepe the Church from falling into an error namely seeing we are not taught in any part of his Epistles nor else where in the New Testament that GOD hath made such an ordinance that in any time the observation of a Sabbath hath beene injoyned unto us that any such day hath beene excepted from those dayes and Sabbaths which in the said New Testament we are forbidden to keepe 6 When the Apostle saith that Christ hath abolished the Law of commandements Eph. 2. vers 15. and hath made a change of the Law Heb. 7. vers 12. We see easily that he understandeth the ceremoniall and not the morall Law because in the same places he explicates his meaning calling it The Law of Commandements contained in ordinances the middle wall of partition betweene the Iewes and Gentiles Ephes. 2. vers 14 15. the Law of a carnall Commandement and of the Leviticall Priesthood weake unprofitable and which made nothing perfect Heb. 7. vers 11. 16 18 19. Because also in many other places wee are taught that the Law abolished by Christ is the Ceremoniall only and doe see all morall Commandements confirmed and ratified by him But when the Apostle discourseth of the abolishment of holy daies and of Sabbaths without any limitation or modification there is no cause why the seventh day should be excepted seeing he excepted it not neither is it excepted in any place of the Gospell which speaketh no where unto us of morall daies of Sabbath as also it is absurd to establish any such day 7 It sufficeth not to alledge that the fourth Commandement of the Law injoineth the seventh day of Sabbath and to inferre from thence that of necessity the Apostles minde was to except that Sabbath as being morall For I say rather that the fourth Commandement in as farre as it injoineth the observation of a seventh day of Sabbath is not morall seeing the Apostle without exception saith that under the Gospell our consciences should not be tied to Sabbath daies words which he had never so uttered if the Sabbath of the fourth Commandement had beene morall and obligatory At least in some other places information and instructions had beene given us of this by him and by the rest of the Evangelists and Apostles who have instructed us in the knowledge of all other morall points which is not to be found For there is not to be seene in the whole new Testament any injunction to observe a Sabbath day But of this point we shall speake more fully hereafter CHAPTER Tenth REASON 10. 1 The Christians in S. Pauls time had no time appointed to them for Gods service seeing some of them esteemed one day above another others esteemed every day alike 2 Answer is made to this argument that those which esteemed every day alike were weeke and therefore erred 3 Refutation of this answer First by the analogie of the other point where hee who did eat herbs onely is called weake and he who knew he might eat all things is called strong 4 Second Because to esteeme all daies alike cannot be called weakenesse 5 Third Because if Christ or his Apostles had appointed a set day for Gods service to esteeme all daies alike had not beene weaknesse but profanenesse which neverthelesse it was not 6 Fourth Otherwise the Apostle would not have said that he that doth not regard a day to the Lord doth not regard it but rather against the Lord. 7 Of what day it is said that one regarded it another regarded it not 8 Fifth Seeing to regard a day is weaknesse and not to regard a day is strength of knowledge God hath not obliged the Christian Church to any set day for his service by any morall or positive Law 1 THE same is plainly shewed by these words of the Epistle to the Romans Chap. 14. vers 5 6. One man esteemeth one day above another another esteemeth every day alike Let every man be fully perswaded in his owne minde He that regardeth a day regardeth it unto the Lord And he that regardeth not the day to the Lord he doth not regard it In this place the Apostle speaketh of religious Christians shewing that they were at variance about two divers heads For some of them beleeved that a Christian man should not sticke nor make a scruple of conscience to eate indifferently all meats Others for conscience sake would eate nothing but herbs Some of them also esteemed every day alike others esteemed one day above another Of those two parties he calleth the one strong the other weak and exhorteth them that were strong to beare the infirmities of the weake namely seeing these things were of small moment and that the weake did such things out of conscience and through a religious respect to God that indeed their conscience was not well informed and directed but at length might be and affiance was to be had that they should be holden up because GOD was able to make them stand verse 4. As concerning eating of all things or eating of herbs onely the Apostle calleth directly weake those which did eate nothing but hearbes And strong those which beleeved that they might eate and indeed did eate all things indifferently But on the other point concerning the disagreement which was among them about dayes whether every day should be esteemed alike or one day should bee esteemed above another he declareth not expresly who were strong who weake Some of those which urge the observation of the Sabbath day as a point of Religion and of conscience commanded by Christ shunning the argument which this place affords against their opinion doe say that those which esteemed every day alike were weake and the others were strong and that this is the Apostle his intention But it is easie to perceive that the contrary opinion is true that say I those which esteemed every day alike were strong and those weake which esteemed one day above another 3 First the analogy of the other point which the Apostle alleadgeth concerning meates sheweth it manifestly For as
those which did not sticke for conscience sake to eate all kinde of meates because they esteemed them all to bee indifferent were strong and those which were scrupulous for conscience sake to eate any thing but hearbes were weake even so accordingly to that wee must ac-acknowledge those which made no difference of dayes for conscience sake but esteemed all dayes equally to have beene strong and those which esteemed one day above another to have beene weake 4 Secondly I cannot see how any man should imagine that the Apostle in his judgement esteemed those to be weake which esteemed every day alike seeing to esteeme every day equally without distinction of any day for conscience sake putting the case there were a fault in that opinion cannot be called weakenesse and infirmity in the sence wherein this word weakenesse is taken by the Apostle in this place and in other places of the Gospell For weaknes and infirmity is said to be in a man when there is a defect in his beliefe concerning things which are lawfull to him that is to say when hee beleeveth not that to bee lawfull which is lawfull unto him and therefore refraineth for conscience sake from that which he is not bound to forbeare So he who beleeveth that it is not lawfull unto him to eate all kinde of meates although God hath given him the free use of them all is weake and infirme But when there is excesse in his beliefe when I say he beleeveth to have liberty to doe that which is not lawfull unto him to doe and doth it without any respect of conscience unto it that is not in the Scriptures language called weakenes but rather ignorance error mistaking If then those which esteemed every day alike had failed in this point as they had done of necessity if there had beene any fault in them they had never beene esteemed and called weake by the Apostle as they are pretended to have beene but rather ignorant errants nay dissolute loose profane 5 Verily if it were true that Iesus Christ had ordained the observation of a set day of rest that the Apostles had commanded it that the Church had practised it as a divine ordinance and as a morall point belonging to Religion as is pretended these Christians who could not bee ignorant of such things and neverthelesse esteemed every day alike established not religion and a point of conscience in any of them and made no greater account of the Lords day then of any other day were of necessity profane men and no better reckoning was to be made of them Yet the Apostle reputeth them not to bee such For he forbiddeth to judge and condemne them as hee will not have them to judge and condemne those that were of contrary opinion ver 3. 10. 6 Nay he affirmeth that those which regarded not the day to the Lord regarded it not verse 6. the meaning of which words is that in so doing they had regard to the glory and obedience due to God knowing that he had made them free from the distinction of dayes and received them being well pleased with that which they did Now supposing the morality of the Sabbath and the commandement of Christ and of his Apostles which made the observation thereof a necessary point of Religion which these men could not be ignorant of I cannot conceive how not regarding the day for Religion and conscience sake to the Lord they regarded it not seeing they had rather sinned against the Lord by not regarding it For they had manifestly vilipended him by their misbeliefe whereby they esteemed not the observation of a day of rest which they knew to be morall and most straitely commanded of God to bee a necessary point of Religion It is therefore more conformable to reason that those which made distinction of dayes and esteemed one above onother were weak And in this doe all the interpreters agree Neverthelesse the Apostle saith with good reason of these weake ones that what they did they did it to the Lord because they did it through devotion and tendernesse of conscience having some Religious ground which was a colourable excuse to their infirmitie and made it tolerable not only to men but to God also 7 Now it being so that the Apostle did write to the Romans who were Gentiles converted to the Christian faith wee may esteeme with great appearance that this day which some of them through infirmitie had so much regard unto was Sunday which was kept in the Church not by any divine Ordinance not also through necessity of Religion but simply by an ecclesiasticall custome in remembrance that on that day Christ rose from death unto life was esteemed of them a day of necessary observation in and for it selfe which others better instructed esteemed not This being so establisheth throughly the opinion that I defend and evicts the other But although the Apostle had intended to speake of dayes commanded in the Old Testament by the Law of Moses to the religious observation whereof many not as yet well instructed in the knowledge of Evangelicall liberty thought themselves to be bound for conscience sake the argument remaineth as strong as can be 8 For howsoever the Apostle his meaning be taken he speaketh generally and imputeth to infirmity of knowledge and of conscience under the Gospell the esteeming of one day above another and to strength and firmenesse the esteeming of all dayes alike which he neither could nor should have pronounced so in generall tearmes if at the same time there had beene a set day of rest binding the conscience of Christians to observe it for its owne sake as being morall and for Gods sake who had commanded it For by this meanes those had not well done so farre were they from being strong in knowledge and conscience for esteeming every day equally which they should not have done But the others had done well and religiously to esteeme one day above another so far were they from being weak which yet notwithstanding is manifestly against the scope of the Apostle who declareth them to be weak not simply as we have touched heretofore for observing a certaine day but for keeping it with a consciencious regard and opinion of a religious obligation particular unto it more than to any other day which is the only thing worthy to be blamed and might be a just cause of offence CHAPTER Eleventh REASON II. 1. The Sabbath was to the Israelites a signe of their sanctification 2. Not only in the toylesome ages of this mortall life but also in the eternity and rest of the life to come 3. Through IESUS CHRIST who hath perfectly accomplished the benefits which it represented imperfectly 4. And therefore it was to continue till his comming only 5. This truth is confirmed in the Epistle to the Hebrewes by the type of the bodily rest of the people in the land of Canaan 6. As also by the type of Gods rest on the Seventh day 7. Gods rest and
which remaineth over lay up for you to bee kept untill the morning The sense of which words is evident that as God on the day before the Sabbath rained Manna for two dayes so they should prepare it on the same day for two dayes baking that which they would bake seething that they would seeth and frying that they would prepare so and after they had eaten of it sufficiently for that day they should lay up the rest so prepared to be kept untill the next day 5 For if as some doe esteeme God would have suffered them to prepare on the Sabbath day that which remained over and the sense of the foresaid words were onely that on Friday they should prepare and made ready such a portion as they should thinke sufficient for the meat of that day and keepe the overplus to be prepared the next day God had not given them on Friday bread for two dayes and had not forborne to raine down Manna upon them on the Sabbath day For it had been farre lesse paines unto them to gather on the seventh day the measure that was needfull unto them then to make it ready afterwards Neither is it likely that after he had forbidden them and had taken from them the meanes to gather any on the Sabbath hay hee gave them liberty to bake seeth frie and prepare it on that day Therefore when he sent them twice as much Manna the day before the Sabbath he did it manifestly that they might both gather and prepare double portion the same day and refraine from preparing any on the Sabbath day 6 And wherefore had Moses advised them so carefully on Friday rather than on the other dayes to bake that which they had to bake but to tell them that the same day they ought to bake the double measure which they should gather For otherwise this advertisement had beene to no purpose because they were wont every day to bake the portion which they had gathered for the day knowing that without a warner But they could not well know without information that they were bound to prepare on the same day the two portions which they had gathered for two dayes And to shew yet more cleerely that what they layd up for the next day they kept it baken Moses said not unto them bake to day that which yee have laid up but only Eat that to day For to day is the Sabbath unto the Lord verse 25. which reason was as valuable to hinder them from preparing as from gathering it the one being no more necessary then the other For as GOD gave them the meanes to gather double measure on the sixt day so had they on the sixt day the means and leasure to bake and prepare that double measure and were not constrained by any necessity to reserve a part or to prepare and bake it on the Sabbath day It is objected against this that if they had layd by the Manna prepared and baken till the next day after it had not beene a wonder that it did not stinke neither was there any worme therein where neverthelesse is related as a marvell verse 24. seeing baking and seething hinder all stinke and breeding of wormes But this objection hath no weight and is not to be regarded For although the Manna so prepared might naturally remaine sound and wholesome untill the next day yet by Gods Almighty power and righteous judgement it had stunke and bred wormes if it had beene kept otherwise then hee had expressely commanded For undoubtedly the Manna unbaken and unprepared might have beene kept on any other day of the weeke till the next day without corruption or any noysome smell The only cause why it stunke and bred wormes was Gods prohibition to leave of it till the morning ver 19 20. which prohibition proceeding from so powerfull and righteous a Lawgiver was of such force that it had stunke and bred wormes being kept till the next morning of any day whatsoever although the Israelites had done their utmost indeavour by baking seething frying and by all other possible meanes to keepe it from putrefaction And therefore it is well noted to the purpose that being laid up baken and prepared on Friday for Saturday it stunke not because that being done according to Gods commandement he restrained his judgement which he had displayed in another day if they had kept it till the next morning 8 Moreover God gave another prohibition to his people saying Ye shall kindle no fire thorowout your habitations on the Sabbath day Exod. 35. vers 3. although it was an action of little importance soone done and bringing no disturbance to Gods service A man went out and gathered stickes on the Sabbath day for his present necessitie as it is to be presumed For this hee was by Gods expresse command stoned to death as a manifest transgressour of the Commandement concerning the Sabbath Numb 15. vers 32 33 34 35. To say that he was stoned not so much for gathering stickes on the Sabbath as for doing it through a too bold contempt of that day is a supposition uncertaine and it is farre more likely that he did it through negligence and unadvisednesse than through contempt and presumptuous audacitie and that this unwarinesse whereof he made an open declaration or some other apparent excuse wherewith he shielded himselfe and which was thought to be true or also the manifest slightnesse of the action was unto them a cause of doubting if they should put him to death according to the Ordinance of the Law Exod. 31. vers 14 15. And so much the rather that God shewed indulgence to those which through errour sinned against his Commandements as may be seene in the same fifteenth Chapter of Numbers verse 22 23 24. And therefore it was thought necessary in this occasion to consult the mouth of the Lord who ordained that this man should bee stoned to death by the whole multitude This he commanded to conciliate so much more credit and reverence to his Law touching the Sabbath to give to understand that it had particular reasons wherfore it ought to be exactly observed and that the lightest faults against the rest of the seventh day were not pardonable and to make by this example of severity the Israelites so much the more fearefull to violate the Sabbath and carefull to abstaine in it from all servile workes even from the least And indeed God in the denunciation of the punishments against the transgressours of this Law had not said that he onely who should profane and vilipend the Sabbath but more generally that he who should doe any worke therein should be put to death and so cut off from among his people as may bee seene in the foresaid 35. Chapter of Exodus verse 2. Also some of the contrary opinion to this which I defend acknowledge that it is so and thereupon vouch that in this rigour of the Law condemning a man to die for gathering stickes on the Sabbath day
making the darkenesse to goe before the light as may be seene in the first Chapter of Genesis ver 1 and 2. 5 Some doe reply that Moses when he saith so was the evening so was the morning c. by the evening understandeth the whole time after noone and by the morning the whole time of light in the same day from the dawning till midde day or the afore noone This reply is not grounded on reason For if that were true Moses had not fixe times put constantly the evening before the morning there being no convenient order that could move him therunto seeing in all respects whereby one thing is first and goeth before another the aforenoone goeth before the afternoone He might in the 5. v. name conveniently the light before the darknes the day before the night because he had not regard there to any natural dependance and following of the one upon the other but only to the order of dignity whereby the day is first in regard to the night But when he saith without varying in the sixe dayes of the week so was the evening so was the morning it is evident that he hath regard to the order of the Creation wherein darknes was first in time before the light and the night went before the day and that so by the evening he understandeth the night which is formost and by the morning the day that followeth which evening and morning make one naturall day 6 Now as in the creation GOD observed this order to make the night goe before the day and to compare the naturall day of the darknesse and of the light even so he prescribed the same observation to the Iewes commanding them to begin their naturall day by the night and to celebrate their Sabbaths or solemne daies of rest from the beginning of such a night till the beginning of the next night This is manifest by the 23. chapter of Leviticus vers 32. where God commanded them that in the ninth day of the seventh moneth at even from even unto even they should celebrate as a solemne Sabbath the Feast of atonement which was to be on the tenth day of the moneth vers 27. And so the tenth day began by the night and continued till the night following And such was consequently the order of all the dayes of the weeke from night to night 7 There is no force no weight at all in the answer broached against this when it is said that this feast of atonement consisted not in one day alone but in a part of two daies to wit of the ninth and of the tenth because it is said in the 27. vers On the tenth day of the seventh moneth there shall be a day of atonement and in the 32. vers In the ninth day of the moneth at even from even unto even shall ye celebrate your Sabbath whence they would faine inferre that both the ninth and the tenth day entred into this Feast For it is cleare by the 28 29 30. verses that the day of atonement consisted only in one day seeing in these verses mention only is made of one dâ—y Ye shall do no worke in that same day for it is a day of atonement Whatsoever soule shall not be afflicted in that same day whatsoever soule doth any worke in that same day which had not beene so often set downe if two dayes had entred into the composition of this Feast The same is apparent by the sixteenth chapter of the same book vers 29 30 31. where the foresaid feast of atonement being the only matter handled in them no mention is made but of one day to wit of the tenth of the seventh moneth and the ninth day is not so much as mentioned whereas it had not beene omitted if it had pertained to that Feast Besides it is without all likenesse and as I beleeve without example that God would have any Feast to begin at the end of one day and to continue and end in a part of another day and so establish Holy-daies by halves Now the 27. vers teacheth us which was the day of this Feast to wit the tenth day of the seventh moneth and the 32. vers sheweth how long it ought to continue to wit the whole tenth day beginning at the end of the ninth day and continuing as long as the tenth day should last from one even unto the next even So the ninth day is not mentioned as a part of the Feast but as the terme that it was to begin at like as the even following is mentioned as the other terme that it was to end at In the ninth day of the moneth at even that is at the end of the ninth day ye shall begin the Feast and it shall last from even unto even that is during the whole tenth day Like as in the twelfth chapter of Exodus 18. vers God ordaineth that on the fourteenth day of the first moneth at even they should eat unleavened bread untill the one and twentieth day of the moneth at even Where the fourteenth day is not specified as one of the daies of unleavened bread for so there should have beene eight whereas it is expresly said vers 15. and every where that they were but seven But it is named in the end and extremity thereof as the terme that the Feast of unleavened bread began at and the one and twentieth day finishing at even as the terme it ended at 8 This observation of the daies of unleavened bread which made up the Feast of the Passeover is of great validity to confirme our intention For as it is written Exod. 12. v. 6. 8. 14 15. Levit. 23. v. 5 6. Num. 28. v. 16 17. Neere to the end of the fourteenth day of the first moneth that is betweene the declining of the Sunne after midday and the setting thereof the Paschall Lambe was killed and rosted and eaten at even with unleavened bread at the entrance of the night The use of unleavened bread in the eating of the Lambe began precisely with the fifteenth day which was the first solemne day of the Feast and lasted seven whole dayes to wit till the one and twentieth day at even which was also another Feast-day holy and solemne as the fifteenth was For it was not lawfull during those seven dayes to have leavened bread neither in the day nor in the night which also was comprised in the appellation of dayes Whence this infallible conclusion is gathered that the naturall day among the Iewes began at even and ended at the next even seeing the first day of the Feast of unleavened bread which was the fifteenth day began at evening when the Paschall Lambe was eaten and the last day thereof which was the one and twentieth ended at even as it began at even 9 For whereas in S. Matthew Chap. 26. ver 17. and S. Marke Chap. 14. v. 12. and S. Luke Chap. 22. v. 7. the day wherein the Paschall Lamb was prepared and rosted is called
the first day of unleavened bread that is said figuratively because of the immediate cōjunction of the time wherein the Lamb was prepared with the time wherin it was eaten with unleavened bread For it was prepared at the end of one day and eaten at the beginning of the next day Or because the same day wherein the Lamb was prepared the Iewes put away leaven and leavened bread out of their houses and prepared unleavened bread for the day following Or also because amongst the Romans of whom the Iewes did at that time depend the naturall day began by the light and the night was the last part therof whereunto it may be the Evangelists had regard But otherwise to speak properly according to the ordinance of the Law it is most certain that the day wherin the Lamb was rosted and prepared was not the first day of unleavened bread For that was the 14. day betweene the two evens this was the 15. day at the entrance thereof On that day leavened bread might be eaten on this day and on the dayes following all leaven was most strictly forbidden That was not a day of rest but of travell and of preparation as it is often called in the Gospel Mat. 27. v. 62. Mar. 15. v. 42. Luk. 23. v. 54. Ioh. 19. v. 14 31. because on it were all things prepared for the feast following as to search and put away all leaven and leavened bread out of their houses to kill to slay to rost the Lamb c. Nay we see that on that day the Iewes caused the Lord Iesus to be crucified and two thieves with him and vexed themselves extreamly all that day to come to their intent This was a great and solemne Sabbath wherein it was not lawfull to doe any manner of worke 10 Let us adde to that hath beene said the practise of the observation of the Sabbath which we read in the thirteenth Chapter of Nehemiah It is said there ver 15 16 17 19 20. that because all manner of ware was brought into the City of Ierusalem and sold on the Sabbath day Nehemiah commanded that as soone as the Sunne should withdraw it selfe from the gates of the City before the Sabbath the gates should be shut and that they should not be opened till after the Sabbath so that the Merchants and sellers of all kind of ware lodged without Ierusalem once or twice from whence we gather manifestly the Sabbath began at the going downe of the Sun and that the night made the first part thereof For if the Sabbath had not begun then wherefore did Nehemiah command so carefully to shut the gates as soone as the sun should withdraw his beames from them and it should begin to be darke And if not the night preceding the day but the night following had made a part of the Sabbath surely the Merchants had beene of necessity constrained to remaine two nights out of Ierusalem whereas it is only said that they past the night once or twice without the Towne to wit the night after Nehomiah had given order that the gates shold be shut as soone as the Sun should retire from them and therfore that night with the day following composed the Sabbath which ending on the next even at the setting of the sun Nehemiah commanded that they should be opened again v. 19. a cōmandement being necessary for the opening of them then at that time because the night returning it was the time to keep them barred and locked seeing they were already shut If the Sabbath had ended with the end of the night it had not beene needful that Nehemiah should command to open the gates after the Sabbath For it was usuall to open them after the night was ended and a particular commandement for that was needlesse But although I had omitted these reasons which I have alleadged the words of the original shew plainly and of themselves what we say These they are v. 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Causher Tsallou Shahare Ieroushalaim liphne Hasshabbat that is as the gates of Ierusalem were darkned before the face or in the presence of the Sabbath or before the Sabbath For the ordinary signification of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Liphne is before the face in the presence And therefore seeing the gates were darkened before the face or in presence of the Sabbath it followeth that when the sun was setting the Sabbath was comming and began at that same instant to shew it selfe if I may speake so 11 Likewise we read in St. Iohn Chap. 19. v. 40 41 42. that Ioseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus having obtained leave of Pilate to take away the body of Iesus as soone as he was dead tooke it wrapt it in a winding sheete with spices as the manner of the Iewes was to bury and laid it in a new Sepulchre which was in a Garden in the same place where he was crucified and laid it there because of the Iewes preparation day for the Sepulchre was nigh at hand that is the night being at hand the beginning of the Sabbath being nigh and comming apace with the night and the day of preparation which preceded the Sabbath drawing nigh the evening and making hast to finish they carryed not farre the body of Iesus but laid it in a Sepulchre hard by after they had wound it in linnen cloathes with aromaticall and fragrant drugs only without any imbalming at that time because they had no leasure to anoint and imbalme him by reason of the neerenesse of the Sabbath which was unto them an high day of Sabbath as it is called in the one and thirtieth verse of the same Chapter for as much as at that time the extraordinary Sabbath of the first day of the feast of unleavened bread occurred with the ordinary Sabbath of the weeke For the same reason the Iewes ver 31. that the bodyes of those that were crucified should not remaine upon the Crosse on the Sabbath day besought Pilate that they might be taken away betimes that is before the end of the day as the Text sheweth plainely Now if the Sabbath had not begun in the evening but only in the morning the Iewes should not have had a cause to urge the taking away of the bodies from the Crosse so quickly nor Ioseph and Nicodemus to bury the body of Iesus so speedily and to interre it in the same place where hee was crucified which the Text sheweth they did on a sudden For the Iewes should have had all the evening and all the night following to procure the taking away of the bodyes Ioseph and Nicodemus should have likewise had time enough to imbalme transport and interre at leasure the body of the LORD where they should thinke fit This is distinctly observed by Saint Luke Chapter 23. verse 53 54. where he saith that the day wherein Ioseph laid the body of Iesus in a Sepulchre was the preparation and the Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is drew on was a comming
A TREATISE OF THE SABBATH AND THE LORDS-DAY Distinguished into foure parts WHEREIN IS DECLARED BOTH THE Nature Originall and Observation as well of the one under the Old as of the other under the New Testament WRITTEN IN FRENCH BY DAVID PRIMEROSE Batchelour in Divinitie in the Vniversity of Oxford and Minister of the Gospell in the Protestant Church of Roven Englished out of his French Manuscript by his Father G. P. D. D. LONDON Printed by Richard Badger for William Hope and are to be sold at his Shop at the signe of the Glove in Corne-Hill 1636. THE TRANSLATOR TO THE READER I Wrote to my Sonne Preacher of the Gospel at Roven desiring him to set downe in a paper distinctly and clearely his oinion concerning the Sabbath with the confirmation thereof by such arguments which hee should thinke most pregnant and a solide refutation of the contrary arguments which he did accordingly but in the French Tongue as writing onely out of a dutifull affection to condescend to my desire not thinking and far lesse desiring it should be Englished and made publike here Neither had I any such intention as being most unwilling that he who is a stranger to this nation although not a stranger to the Church should goe formost to breake this yee And therefore I kept it by me three yeeres till being advertised that others were gone before and their Bookes were on the Presse and finding no man that would or could translate it into our Tongue and take the wearisome paines to place the additions which he sent me at divers times afterwards in their roomes I undertooke this labour my selfe hoping that things being compared with things cause with cause reasons with reasons and the contrary arguments which are to be found in so many bookes for and against the morality of a seventh day of a weekly Sabbath being examined and conferred one by another the Christian charitable and judicious Readers shall be stirred up after they have proved all things to hold fast that which is good without imparing any thing of that religious service which they owe and yeeld publikely in the Church and privately at home with their families to the Lord their God who needs not the errours of men though never so specious for the upholding of his service If in this end of my translation I have done any thing amisse I say with David Let the righteous smite me it shall be a kindnes and let him reprove me it shall be an excellent oile which shall not breake mine head In the meane while let all Christians according to the exhortation of the Apostle put off anger wrath malice and put on charity which is the bond of perfection and so walk worthy of the vocation wherwith we are called with all lowlines and meeknesse with long suffering forbearing one another in love endeavouring to keepe the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace that living in peace the God of love and peace may be with us and live in us for ever and ever Amen THE PREFACE The state of the Question 1. All men are bound to serve God every day privately in some measure according to his word 2. They are also bound to serve him publikely and to have a day stinted for his publike service 3. There is among godly and learned Christians a great controversie about the Originall Nature and Observation of that day 4. Some hold the sanctification and observation of one of the seven dayes of the weeke to be morall and therefore of perpetuall necessity since the beginning unto the end of the world 5. Others maintaine that the stinting of a day for Gods publike service is a point of order and of Ecclesiasticall governement depending wholly on institution 6. This Treatise made for the defence of this last opinion is divided into foure parts 1 ALl men are obliged to honour and serve God all the dayes of their life by the heedfull practice of all the exercises of religion and godlinesse which hee hath prescribed in his holy word Neither ought they to let any day slip without the imployment of some time and the carefull applying of themselves in some competent measure to that duty that thereby they may thrive in the knowledge of truth which is after godlinesse and increase in sanctification without which no man shall see the Lord. Neverthelesse seeing God hath ordained that man in the sweat of his face shall eat his bread and live by the labour of his owne hands Gen. 3. v. 19. that this transitory and dying life is besieged with so numerous an hoste of difficulties that it cannot be guarded without many necessary imployments returning every day that the labour whereunto all men are tied will scarcely suffer them to take their breath they cannot for the most part apply themselves to the necessary actions of Gods service with such care vigilancie attention and continuance as is requisite 2 These ordinary paines of temporall callings are a far greater impeachment to the publike and solemne service that the faithfull are bound to render joyntly to God in their publike meetings For the King of heaven is not satisfied with their private devotions in their closets severally or together with their families at home but will have them also to doe unto him full and absolute homage abroad confessing him to be their Creator Redeemer and perpetuall Benefactor calling upon his holy name and setting forth his praise in their congregations and religious assemblies Now the dayes of man are a warfare upon earth and his dayes are like the dayes of an hireling and the life of the faithfull is intangled and diverted with so many necessary and toilesome affaires that it is very difficult unto them to have such holy and religious meetings every day yea in many places it is impossible Therefore it is altogether necessary that a day be chosen and picked out from amongst a number of other dayes and peculiarly appointed that in it as often as it returneth all persons setting aside the care of all temporall and worldly affaires and daily imployments may extraordinarily set themselves with one accord to serve God publikely in the assemblies appointed for that end and that each person may on that day serve him apart before and after the publike service with such a regard and assiduity that it goe beyond the ordinarie devotion of every day No body amongst true Christians which take to heart the honour glory and service of God will make a controversie of this Neither is this the subject of the controversie which is canvassed and sifted on both sides with great earnestnesse yea with too great eagernesse between many Christians which are learned godly and consenting in the profession of the same doctrine and truth of the Gospel of peace 3 Their variance and disagreement is about the nature beginning and particular observation of the day which is separated from all other dayes that it may be especially applied
pretence 4 Of this I inferre that seeing in the Gospell there is no expresse command touching the keeping of a seventh day of rest it cannot be a morall point For since all other morall points are so often and so expresly injoined therein what likelihood is there that God would have omitted this without making an evident injunction thereof Nay seeing under the old Testament God was so carefull to recommend the keeping of his Sabbaths as may be seene every where in the Bookes of the Prophets is it credible that if he had intended under the new Testament to tie us to the observation of a seventh day of Sabbath he would have shewne as great care to recommend it unto us as he did theirs to the Iewes seeing it is pretended that on Gods behalfe we are as straitly bound to the observation of the Sabbath as they were CHAPTER seventh REASON 7. 1 Manifest reasons out of the three first Evangelists against the morality of the Sabbath What is meant by the Sabbath second first 2 Exposition of Christs answer to the Pharisees who blamed his Disciples for plucking the cares of corne and rubbing them to eate on the Sabbath day 3 First argument out of this answer The Sabbath is declared to be of the same nature that the Shew bread and Sacrifices were of and mercy is preferred unto it Therefore it is not morall 4 Second argument Christ affirmeth that the Sabbath was made for man not man for the Sabbath Therefore it is not morall 5 A reply to this argument refuted 6 Third argument Christ addeth that the Sonne of man is Lord even of the Sabbath day Therefore the Sonne of man being taken for Christ as he is Christ and Mediator it is not morall 7 Fourth argument Christ did handie-works without necessity and commanded servile workes to be done on the Sabbath day without necessity Therefore it is not morall 8 Christ as the Sonne of man was not Lord of the morall Law but only of the ceremoniall Therefore the Sabbath is not morall 9 If the Sonne of man who is Lord of the Sabbath be taken in its vulgar signification for every man the Sabbath cannot be morall 10 Hence it followeth that the Sabbath was onely a positive Law given to the Iewes and not to Christians 1 I Adde that not onely there is nothing expresly set downe in the Gospel confirming the morality of a Sabbath day but much otherwise that it furnisheth strong arguments to overthrow it As among others those namely which are to be found in S. Matthew Ghap. 12. vers 1 c. in S. Marke Chap. 2. vers 23. c. in S. Luke Chap. 6. vers 1 c. where is related a thing that came to passe on the Sabbath day which S. Matthew and S. Marke call simply the Sabbath and S. Luke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Sabbath second first or second principall which the interpretors take diversly Some understand it of two holy daies the one following the other immediately and more particularly of the second day after the first of the feast of unleavended bread For that feast was kept seven daies which all were Sabbaths although the first and the last only were solemne Sabbaths of holy convocation Others take it for the seventh and last day of the said feast of unleavened bread which was a very solemne day and equall in holinesse to the first day of the said feast whence it was called Second First that is to say another first or the first called backe againe and renued A third sort expound it of the second solemne feast of the yeere called the feast of weekes or of first fruits and by S. Luke the Sabbath Second First that is second in order after the first and as it were another first in dignity For all the feast daies were Sabbaths It may be also that this Sabbath Second First fell out on an ordinary Sabbath of the weeke Wherein there is a great apparence of truth seeing the Pharisees blamed Christs Disciples for plucking the eares of corne and rubbing them in their hands to eat on that day which they could not have done with any colour saving on an ordinary and weekely day of Sabbath wherein God had forebidden all kinde of worke and namely the making ready of meat For in all other solemne Sabbaths of yeerely feasts he had expresly permitted this particular worke of making ready whatsoever was necessary to every one to eate as may be seene Exod. 12. vers 16. But although this Sabbath Second first be understood of another day then of an ordinary Sabbath it imports not much and no exception can be taken against it to impaire the strength of the arguments which are gathered out of the foresaid places For whatsoever Christ said in defence of that which his Disciples did and the Pharisees blamed in this Sabbath second first is manifestly generall and pertaineth to all Sabbaths kept in times past among the Iewes whether ordinary or extraordinary Thus then the three Evangelists doe record that Iesus went on the Sabbath day thorow the corne fields and his Disciples plucked the eares of corne and did eat rubbing them in their hands Whereof being reproved by the Pharisees as profaners of the Sabbath whereon God forebad to doe any worke Iesus Christ to cleare them and refute the Pharisees alledgeth the example of David and of those that were with him Which when they were an hungry did take and eate the Shew-bread which was not lawfull to eate but to the Priests alone and were not blamed for this because the necessity of hunger was a sufficient excuse unto them Whence his intent was to inferre that his Disciples also in that which they did then were to be excused of breaking of the Sabbath by the same necessity of hunger which they were pinched with and which gave them liberty to doe that which otherwise was not lawfull to doe on the Sabbath day Moreover Iesus Christ addeth If yee had knowne what this meaneth I will have Mercy and not Sacrifice yee would not have condemned the guiltlesse Of which argument this is the force that if God preferred the works of mercy and of love to the Sacrifices which in all the outward service of the Law were the most holy and would have the Sacrifices to give place to those workes by identity of reason his meaning was also that the keeping of the Sabbath or abstaining from outward works on that day should give place to that mercy and love which man oweth to himselfe or to his neighbours and would not have allowed that a man should consent to die for want of meat to be hunger-starved or to bring harme to himselfe by some other evill rather then to breake the Sabbath by making meat ready or doing some other necessary worke which was otherwise forbidden on the Sabbath day Hee confirmeth this saying The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath the meaning of which words is
of Nehemiah not for their owne sake but only in consideration of the Iewes lest they should offend them and give them occasion to breake the Sabbath after their example For the observation of the Sabbath did no more oblige them naturally then the other observation of the Iewish religion lust as in all politick regiment which is well ordered it is usuall to hinder those that are strangers to the religion professed in it from giving any disturbance to the exercises of devotion namely in the solemnities and holy daies To urge this point is it not true that among the Iewes strangers were obliged to keep all other Sabbaths new Moons holy daies solemnities after the same manner that they were constrained to keepe the Sabhath that is not to violate them publikely and with offence Were they not forbidden as well as the Iewes to eate leavened bread during the seven daies of the Passeover Exodus 12. verse 19. as also to eate blood Levit. 17 vers 10. 12 13. Will any man upon this inferre that the ordinances of all these Sabbaths new Moones Feasts unleavened bread abstinence from eating blood were not ceremonies but morall ordinances obliging for ever all men and consequently all Christians under the new Testament Sure this must be concluded by the same reasoning the vanity whereof is by this sufficiently demonstrated and discredited 10 Fifthly they inforce their opinion with these words For in sixe daies the LORD maae heaven and earth the sea and all that in them is and rested the seventh day Whence they gather that sith the creation must be in perpetuall remembrance and God ordained to the Iewes the seventh day for a memoriall therof and of his rest all men ought to keepe it continually for the same end and in that follow his example which also hee proposeth in the words before mentioned to the end that as hee made his workes in sixe daies and rested the seventh day so likewise men following his example should give themselves to the workes of their calling during the sixe daies of the weeke and rest on the seventh day that they may apply it to the consideration of the works of God which they pretend to be no lesse obligatory towards Christians under the new Testament then towards the Iewes under the old Testament because wee cannot follow and imitate a better example then the example of God 11 To this I answer first that it may be denyed that Gods end in the institution of the Sabbath day was that it should be a memoriall of the creation of all his workes on sixe daies and of his rest on the seventh day That is not said any where but this onely is specified that God sanctified the seventh day because in it he rested from his workes after he had made them in sixe daies Which sheweth only the occasion that God tooke to ordaine and establish the Sabbath day but not the end of the institution thereof which is declared unto us in the foresaid places of Exodus 31. vers 13. and of Ezech. 20. vers 12. where it is said that God ordained it to be a signe between him and the Israelites that he was the Lord that did sanctifie them This end of the said institution as likewise the motive and occasion thereof are coupled together in the 16. and 17. verses of the said 31. Chapter of Exodus in these words The children of Israel shall keepe the Sabbath throughout their generations for a perpetuall covenant It is a signe betwene me and the children of Israel for ever Whereof a signe Certainly that they may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie them as it is written in the 13. verse This is the end of the Institution of the Sabbath which must be supplyed from thence After that it followeth For in sixe daies the LORD made heaven and earth and on the seventh day he rested and was refreshed This is the occasion and motive of the said institution There be some that would faine of this For make That and joine the two members of the 17. verse as if they were but one after this manner It is a signe betweene me and the children of Israel for ever that in sixe daies the Lord made heaven and earth to inferre from thence that the Sabbath was ordained expresly to the end it might be a memoriall of the Creation but although the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth That as well as For yet that in the foresaid verse it should rather signifie For and that the said verse should have two distinct members and each of them its owne particular sentence it appeareth probably both by the changing of the forme of speech that God useth speaking of himselfe in the first person in the first member It is a signe betweene mee and the children of Israel for ever and in the third person in the second member For in sixe daies the LORD made heaven and earth whereas if it had beene the continuance of the same period without distinction hee should have rather have said It is a signe betweene me and the children of Israel that I have created in sixe daies or that I am the Lord who have created in sixe daies heaven and earth c. As also by the Hebrew accent Athnach which it put at the end of the first member and is an accent denoting usually a pause and notable respiration and a distinction of a compleate sentence 12 Secondly to stand longer upon this first answer although I should yeeld that the seventh day of Sabbath was instituted of God purposely to be a memoriall of the Creation the argument is neverthelesse inconsequent For although things past should be in perpetuall remembrance It followeth not that the signes and memorialls of such things instituted under the old Testament should be perpetuall Nay they ought not to be if they have beene therewith types and figures relative to the Messias God made a covenant with Abraham and promised unto him to be God unto him and to his seed after him Gen. 17. vers 7. which is a perpetuall benefit and worthy to be remembred by all his spirituall posterity till the end of the world Yet the signe and memoriall that hee gave him at that time of this covenant to wit the Circumcision was not to be perpetuall and hath continued onely till the time of the new Testament Likewise all the Sacraments under the old Testament have beene signes and memorialls of perpetuall benefits to wit of justification sanctification c. Notwithstanding they ought not to persist for ever because they also were types The same is the condition of the Sabbath We may and ought to call to minde under the new Testament the benefit of the Creation and of Gods rest after it although we have no particular signe thereof which by Gods ordinance is a signe of remembrance In the Kingdome of heaven we shall celebrate eternally the remembrance of our Creation and Redemption without any
is not repugnant S. Luke in the 23. chap. 56. vers Where he saith that the women after they had beheld the Sepulchre and how the Lords body was laid returned and prepared odours and ointments and rested the Sabbath day according to the Commandement which words seeme to import that they prepared their spices before the Sabbath For the order and coherence of these words doe not designe the like order and coherence of things but they must be understood after this manner being returned they prepared their odours And or rather But they rested the Sabbath day to wit first and before this preparation as appeareth by the conference of the 54. vers where it is said that when the body of Christ was laid in the tombe and the women beheld where it was laid the Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 drew on that is was at hand and ready to begin as hath beene said before So that it was impossible to them to prepare any kind of thing for the inbalming of Christ before the Sabbath Whence it followeth that sith then it was evening the end of the same Sabbath fell upon the dawning or evening of the night following and so was both the end of the last day of the weeke preceding and the beginning of the night following whereby the first day began And that was the time betokened by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned by Saint Matthew and the night preceding the first day of the weeke which he nameth afterward did belong to the said first day making with it the naturall and civill day of the Iewes and did not belong to the Sabbath For if it had pertained to the Sabbath and the first day of the weeke following the Sabbath had begun in the morning sith it is constant that before the Sabbath they prepared not their aromaticall drugs when should they have found the opportunity and leisure to prepare them They durst not doe it on the Sabbath day for it was a day of rest and of cessation from all work As also S. Luke saith Chap. 23. vers 56. That they rested the Sabbath day according to the Commandement After the Sabbath upon the first day of the weeke they could not doe it granting that this day began in the morning For very early in the morning as it was yet darke they went with their spices already bought and prepared And therefore we must of necessity say that they bought their spices in the evening after the Sunne was set and the Sabbath ended that during the night which was the beginning of the first day of the week they prepared these drugs and that in the morning of the same day they came to imbalme Iesus Which being so we must interpret the words of S. Matthew after such a sort that they may agree with the sayings of the other Evangelists And it is in no wise necessary to joyne the evening or the latter end of the Sabbath with the beginning of the light of the first day of the weeke as if the one and the other had met together in one time and at once as is pretended There is betweene these two the intervall of a night which pertained to this first day of the weeke and we may translate the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as S. Marke speaketh that is in the evenining at the extremitie or latter end of the Sabbath this extremity being already come and past or in the evening that is in the night the first part thereof being taken for the totall after the Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to wit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at that same houre or time which began to shine yet with a little remnant of the nights darknesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bee the first day of the weeke that is the first day of light the first artificiall day which is a part of the naturall day Or wee may take these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the time that was to shine in the first day of the weeke For it was not S. Matthews intent to specifie unto us the immediate conjunction of the first day of the weeke with the Sabbath finishing but only at what point of time the woman came to the Sepulchre to wit at the first glimpse of the light of the first day of the weeke and hee made mention of the evening or of the latter end of the Sabbath in respect that the Sabbath had hindred them till then to apply themselves to this pious and charitable worke which they had intended 17 Moreover they produce a passage out of the twentieth chapter of the Acts vers 7. 11. where it is said that the Disciples in Troas being come together upon the first day of the weeke to breake bread Paul preaching unto them continued his speech untill midnight and after he had broken bread and eaten continued to talke unto them even till the breake of day In which words they pretend that the night is mentioned as the last part of the first day of the weeke But first nothing obligeth us to grant that the night there mentioned ought to be referred to the first day of the weeke For we may affirme as well that it pertained to the second day and made the beginning thereof The words of the Text are very well verified if we say that the first day of the weeke and towards the end thereof the Disciples were assembled and their assembly having begun about the end of the first day continued a good while with and after the beginning of the second day Paul because he was to depart on the morning after the first day taking this occasion to extend his discourse within the night following which was the beginning of another day There is no weight in the objection they make against this exposition saying that if it were true Paul had remained longer then seven dayes at Troas to wit a part of an eight day against that which is said in the sixth verse For they presuppose without any ground that Paul was not precisely but seven dayes at Troas which the Text saith not but only that he abode there seven dayes which should be very well expressed so although he had remained there a part of the eighth day which might have beene past under silence and not counted with the dayes going before because it was not a full and whole day but only a part of a day And putting the case that it should come within the compasse of the seven dayes of the Apostles aboade at Troas we may say it was taken for the seventh and last day For it is not told exactly on what day Paul came to Troas nor that he abode there full seven dayes but only in generall seven dayes Now although he had beene there but a part of the first and a part of the last of seven it may be well said that hee was there seven dayes
there was some ceremonie added to the moralitie of the Commandement concerning this day and injoyned to the Iewes in that time of infancie and that it obligeth us no more than other ceremonies annexed at that time to moralities Whereof speech shall be againe made hereafter Mary Magdalene and Mary mother of Iames durst not worke on that day to imbalme Christs body but delayes to doe it and to buy the spices necessary thereto till it was past though they might have done it in a short space resting on that day according to the Commandement Mark 16. vers 1. Luk. 23. ver 56. and thinking themselves bound to the precise observation of the said Commandement because they knew not that it was abolished by our Lord Iesus Christ. 9 So it is evident that the observation of the Sabbath was to the Iewes most precise and exact Neither was it lawfull unto them to doe any outward and corporall workes saving those that were necessary for the outward and ceremoniall service which GOD required on that day as to the Levites and Priests to kill and dresse the beasts for the Sacrifices and to burne the fat upon the Altar Numb 28. vers 9. Matth. 12. vers 5. to particular men to circumcise their children Iohn 7. vers 22 23. to walke a certaine space from home to the place of Gods service where there was an holy convocation ordained of God on the Sabbath day Levit. 23. vers 3. which may be gathered out of the second booke of the Kings Chap. 4. vers 23. Where the husband of the Shunamite asked her wherefore she would goe to the Prophets seeing it was neither new Moone nor Sabbath which sheweth that it was lawfull to goe on the Sabbath day to the places where Gods Prophets abode to teach the people Or the Priests to minister to the Lord in things belonging to his service And this distance of way was by tradition limited and stinted to two thousand common steps as may be gathered out of the twelfth verse of the first chapter of the Acts where the distance betweene the mount of Olives and the towne of Ierusalem which was of so many steps is called A Sabbath dayes journey which tradition and ordinance concerning a Sabbath dayes journey which is not formally prescribed in the Law some are of opinion that it had its originall from the injunction given to the Israelites in the second Chapter of Numbers and the second verse to pitch under their standards about the Tabernacle of assignation over against it or a little farre off from it And in the third Chapter of Ioshua verse 3 and 4. which doe explicate this distance to goe after the Arke of the Covenant keeping betweene them and it the space of two thousand cubites by measure which journey by consequent they were of necessity to make every Sabbath day during their abode in the wildernesse to come to the Tabernacle of assignation where the Arke was and to assist there to the holy convocation which by Gods command was solemnized on that day Levit. 23. vers 3. which afterward the Doctors of the Iewes tooke and established for a rule of the journey which a man might make on the Sabbath day for Gods service and for holy and religious ends There be some who say that they extended this licence of two thousand cubits to walke for recreation and pastime But this hath no ground in the Law as I conceive Moreover they were also permitted on the Sabbath day to doe workes of charity mercifulnesse and compassion necessary to themselves or to their neighbours yea and to their beasts also As to flie and to fight to save their lives and to defend themselves in time of warre As Eliah threatned by Iezebel fled for his life and went forty dayes and forty nights unto Horeb wherein there were many Sabbaths 1 Kings 19. v. 3 8. As the Iewes decreed to defend themselves on the Sabbath day if their enemies came to make battell with them on that day 1 Maccab. 2. v. 41. having learned wisdome by the example of their brethren who being assaulted on the Sabbath chused most unadvisedly to dye rather than to make resistance for their lives v. 36 37 38. As according to the opinion of some it was on the Sabbath day that the Israelites fought against Ierico Ios. 6. verse 15 16 20 21. and against the Syrians 1 King 20. verse 29. but this is not evident enough As also to care dresse cure heale sicke folkes which Christ taught the Iewes to be lawfull and did often himselfe as we see in diverse places of the Gospell As to lay hold on a poore beast and lift it out of the pit that it was fallen into on the Sabbath day Mat. 12. ver 11 12. lead it to watering give it foode and doe unto it all other necessary things Luk. 13. ver 15. 11 An important and urgent necessity which could not be foreseene prevented hindred and admitted no delay made lawfull unto them on the Sabbath day actions which otherwise had beene unlawful As although they were forbidden to prepare meat to eat it on the Sabbath day yet if a man could not get meat to prepare or was deprived of all possible meanes to prepare the meat he had nor find meat made ready on the Sabbath day and that he were in danger to starve I esteeme that rather than he should suffer incommodity in his health or danger in his life God was well pleased that hee should prepare some on the Sabbath for his sustentation For upon this ground Iesus Christ maintained against the Pharisees the action of his Disciples who being an hungred in following him plucked eares of corne and did eat rubbing them in their hands Mat. 12. verse 1. Luk. 6. verse 1. likewise although they were forbidden to kindle the fire on the Sabbath day yet if they had beene pinched with some urgent necessity I doubt not but to kindle the fire had beene acceptable to God I esteeme that the like judgement is to be made of all other actions of the like nature although otherwise forbidden on the Sabbath day 21 These reasons taken from Gods service when externall and corporall actions pertained unto it from charity and compassion or from some great and urgent necessity being excepted it was not lawfull to doe any workes of common and ordinary labour nay not the least during either the time of Gods service in his house either afore or after it publikely or privately in the whole space of 4. and twenty houres betweene the two evenings as is evident by the prohibitions so expresse so particular so frequent made concerning that matter Philo in the second booke of the life of Moses saith that it was not lawfull to the Iewes to plucke on the Sabbath day a bough a fruit a leafe of a tree And all the Rabbins of the Iewes which writ of the observation of the Sabbath goe farre beyond whatsoever is exact and precise in the
perpetuall 4 The first reply to this Answer refuted 5. The said reply is not well grounded on the example of a Pharisee who called Christ to eat bread on the Sabbath day 6. Confirmation of the refutation of the said reply by the Scriptures 7. By the testimony of Saint Augustine and of Saint Ignace and by reason 8. The second reply taken from equality yea from oddes of reason refuted 9. A mystery hid in the prohibition to cooke meat on the Sabbath day c. 10. Third Answer the prohibition to kindle fire was perpetuall and not referred to the building of the Tabernacle 11. If it was referred thereto it was onely by application 12. If it was not lawfull to kindle fire for the uses of the Tabernacle farre lesse for other uses 13. Confirmation of this answer by reason and by the testimony of Philo. 14. Fourth Answer The particular prohibitions were explications of the generall prohibition of the fourth Commandement 15. Fifth and last Answer God hath no where made an exception of any worke on the weekely Sabbath as he did on the Sabbath of the Passeover 1 SOme of the contrary opinion have seene the difficulty propounded in the former Chapter to wit that there is no reason to say that some workes which the Iewes were forbidden to do as wel as all other by the fourth Commandement are permitted but the rest are not permitted if it be true that the prohibition of the fourth Commandement obligeth us as they pretend Therefore they say that these workes which as they confesse we are permitted to doe as to kindle the fire and to make meat ready on the Sabbath day were permitted to the Iewes as well as unto us and are not comprised in the prohibition of the fourth Commandement and that the particular prohibitions which are made in Exodus Chapter 16. and 35. were temporall had respect only to the time of the peoples sojourning in the wildernesse and were grounded on reasons particular to that time 2 But this is an affirmation without ground and without all likelihood For to speake of the injunction given them to tarry every man in his place and not to goe out of it on the Sabbath day Exod. 16. vers 29. it is true that it was given them by occasion of the Manna to the intent that they should not goe forth to seeke any yet undoubtedly it was extended also to all other things of the like nature to wit to all bodily and earthly ends God by that one example forbidding them to apply themselves to the seeking of them there being a like reason for all I say bodily and earthly because a spirituall and heavenly end was excepted by the third verse of the three and twenty Chapter of Leviticus and there was no other end but such a one which might be an exception from the said prohibition Will any man say that during their abode in the wildernesse they might freely and without offence goe about other worldly businesses the gathering of Manna excepted This goeth beyond all semblance of truth And therefore if this was not left to their liberty the prohibition of the sixteenth Chapter of Exodus had a farther regard than to the Manna onely Now if they were restrained in the wildernesse and durst not goe forth for earthly imploiments as to gather Manna what reason can be alleaged why in the land of Canaan they were free to come and to goe and trouble themselves with the care and pursuit of the bread that perisheth and of other things of this world 3 The same judgement ought to be made of the prohibition to to cooke and dresse meat in the wildernesse on the Sabbath day which meat was Manna wherefore ought not this prohibition to have place in the land of Canaan for all other meats The Israelites had they not leisure in Canaan to prepare their meat the day before the Sabbath as much nay more than they had for the Manna in the wildernesse Neverthelesse the day before the Sabbath which was the sixth day of the weeke God said to them concerning the Manna Bake that which ye will bake and seethe that which ye will seethe and all that remaineth lay it up to be kept till the morning for you And why To morrow saith he is the rest of the holy Sabbath unto the Lord Exod. 16. vers 23. words which shew that the observation of the Sabbath day by him prescribed unto them with respect not onely to their pilgrimage in the wildernesse but also to their abode in Canaan was the cause why hee rained not Manna upon them and suffered them not to prepare any on that day and by his law forbade them universally in their generations to cooke and prepare any meat on the Sabbath day For if it were a thing that he left to their libertâ— by the Law wherefore did hee not raine Manna upon them on the Sabbath day Or if hee gave them not any lest they should goe forth and gather it on that day and if he obliged them to gather twice as much the day before giving them that day bread for two dayes vers 29. which necessity forced them to doe seeing the next day there was not any to bee found in the fields wherefore did he not at least suffer them to deferre till the Sabbath day the cooking of that portion which they had gathered and laid up for that day rather than to injoyne them as he did to make ready twice as much the day before and so take from them all occasion of preparing it on the Sabbath day which they might have done easily although there was none to be found in the fields that day Certes he did betoken that not onely the seeking and gathering but also the cooking and preparing of meat on that day displeased him because it was a day ordained by him to rest in which is a perpetuall reason for all the dayes and times that the Law of Moses was to continue 4 To say that God commanded both to gather and to prepare the Manna the day before and to keepe it till the Sabbath day because he would manifest his miraculous power in preserving from corruption the Manna which else had bred wormes and stunke Exod. 16. vers 20. from one of these dayes to the other is an unsufficient answer For first the same miracle had beene although the Manna had beene kept crude and unbaked to be sodden and prepared the next day Secondly God might have done if it had pleased him the same miracle in respect to another day as well as to the Sabbath day Wherefore then did he it for the Sabbath day but to ordaine to the Israelites the cessation from all workes and amongst others from making meat ready on the Sabbath day in their generations Also wee see no examples of preparing of meat on the Sabbath day among them 5 To prove that they did is unfitly alleaged the first verse of the fourteenth chapter of S. Luke
where it is said that Iesus Christ entred into the house of one of the chiefe Pharisees on the Sabbath day to eat bread that is to take his refection For it is not said that this Pharisee had caused the repast to be made ready on the same Sabbath day which he had never done seeing the Pharisees found sault with the simple action of Christs Disciples who on the Sabbath day going thorow the corne fields plucked some eares of corne and did rub them in their hands to eat them Luke 6. vers 1. 6 Which is againe a most manifest argument that in those dayes the Iewes prepared not any meat on the Sabbath day and also that it was not permitted by the Law For if it had beene permitted the accusation of the Pharisees against Christs Disciples had wanted all ground and colour of reason when they said unto them Why do ye that which is not lawfull to do on the Sabbath dayes Luk. 6. vers 1. And it had not beene needfull that Christ should have alleaged to defend them that the hunger wherewith they were pinched and their present need of sustenance excused their action even as a like cause excused the action of David and of those that were with him when being an hungred they tooke and ate the Shew-bread which was not lawfull to eate but for the Priests onely as also that God will have mercy and not Sacrifice Matth. 12. vers 3 4 5. For he might have answered in one word that the action of his Disciples to prepare meat was not at all forbidden by the Law and that there was no semblance of reason to blame it whereas by his answer he supposeth that indeed it was forbidden ordinarily as well as to eat of the Shew-bread to all others but Priests and he maintaineth not his Disciples to be excusable but by their present necessity which made lawfull that which otherwise had beene unlawfull unto them For if that whereby hee defended them had beene lawfull otherwise than in case of necessity what need had hee to excuse them upon their present necessitie S. Austin in the fourth chapter of the sixth booke against the Manichees saith that the Iewes on their Sabbath gather not any kinde of fruit in the field that they mince and cooke no meat at home 7 Also S. Ignace Martyr in his Epistle to the Magnesians teaching how the Sabbath is to be observed and that by opposition to the fashions of the Iewes amongst other things saith that it ought not to be kept by eating meats prepared and kept the day before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which sheweth that the Iewes prepared not their meat on the Sabbath day but the day before which for this cause they have called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Preparation Mar. 15. 42. because on it they prepared all that was needfull for the Sabbath following As also the same name for the same reason is given to the day that went immediately before the first day of the unleavened bread of the Passeover This abstinence from making ready all kinde of meat on the Sabbath day was undoubtedly the cause that moved some Pagans to beleeve and say that the Iewes fasted on that day as we see in the one and thirtieth Booke of the History of Iustin and in the life of Augustus Caesar written by Suetonius chap. 76. 8 The inference which is made from equality or rather odsof reason that sith the Law permitted the Iews to lead their cattell to the water on the Sabbath day as is cleare by the testimony of S. Luk. 13. 15. it permitted them also to prepare their own meat is of no value For there is not a like necessity of the last as of the first A man must every day water his beast that it may be fed entertained but it is not necessary that a man prepare meat every day for himselfe for he may in the day before prepare meat enough for the day following The inference that can be lawfully and in equall tearmes made of the foresaid permission concerning a mans beast is that farre more should a man be licensed to eat and drinke on the Sabbath day if he be an hungred or a thirst and give meat and drink to another that is very hungry or dry yea to make meat ready too in an urgent and present necessity of hunger and thirst in case there were not any already prepared to be found which I would not deny but the Law did permit But it followeth not hereof that it was permitted to make an ordinary preparation of meat on the Sabbath day as on other dayes and to deferre the preparation thereof which might have beene wisely done the day before till the Sabbath day which is the point in question and which I have clearely shewed before to be expresly forbidden by the Law Exod. 16. 23. Which ordained not for the time onely of the abode of the people in the wildernesse but also for all their generations in time to come that all workes necessary for the Sabbath should be prepared before it came 9 Wherein may be considered a type and a mysterie God giving to understand thereby that during the time of this life we ought to prepare good workes to the end we may injoy the profit and utility issuing of them and eat their fruit as the Scripture speaketh in the eternall Sabbath of the life to come and not to differre from day to day till that great Sabbath come the preparing of our lampes and filling them with abundance of oyle left we knocke and cry in vaine Lord Lord open unto us Matth. 25. 1. c. Mat. 7. vers 22 23. 10 As for the prohibition to kindle fire on the Sabbath day Exod 35. vers 3. it is cleare that it speaketh not onely what the Israelites were to do in the wildernesse but also in Canaan The words are plaine Ye shall kindle no fire thorowout or in any of your habitations upon the Sabbath day which words thorowout or in any of your habitations ought to be referred rather to the land of Canaan than to the wildernesse because it was in Canaan that they were to have their habitations and seats as is implied by the word in the originall whereas in the wildernesse they sojourned onely in tabernacles And it is very unreasonable to imagine that because immediately after mention is made of the building of the Tabernacle of God this prohibition to kindle fire on the Sabbath day had respect onely unto it as if God had forbidden onely to kindle fire for preparing and fitting their tooles and imploying them on that day about that work For although the speech of the building of the Tabernacle followeth immediately after the prohibition to kindle fire yet it followeth not that there is any connexion betweene these things and that they are relative one to another Nay they seeme rather to be dis-joyned and severed in the text it selfe For after
observation of foure and twenty houres practised by the Iewes on their Sabbath day 2 This opinion is absurd and bringeth backe under the New Testament a ceremonie which is meerely servile and Iewish For times and places were in themselves to the Iewes a part of the legall and ceremoniall service as hath beene shewed before And therefore they were precisely named and stinted unto them When God appointed unto them Sabbath dayes hee would that they should rest as long as the day lasted that is foure and twenty houres even as when hee granted unto them dayes of worke hee permitted them to worke night and day which may bee gathered out of Leviticus Chap. 23. vers 32. where God said unto them From Even unto Even shall ye celebrate your Sabbath In Hebrew ye shall rest your Sabbath To rest all that time was unto them a part of the observation and hallowing of that day But under the New Testament the times appointed in the Church make no part of Gods service and are not observed but relatively to the publike exercises of Religion and of godlinesse which are established to be practised in them And therefore that practise being ended they oblige not necessarily 3 And indeed if Christians were bound for conscience sake to observe exactly full foure and twenty houres by abstinence from all works they should be in a marvellous great trouble vexation of minde For ere ought else be done they must know certainely where they shall begin the sanctification of the foure and twenty houres of that day if it must be from Even unto the next Even beginning the day at the setting of the Sunne as under the Law or from the morning unto the next morning beginning the day at the rising of the Sunne For if they be not clearely informed of that they may sinne by working during a part of the time which makes a part of Sunday 4 The Authors and Fautors of the foresaid opinion cannot give a certaine resolution of this Point For they are at variance among themselves about it Some deeme that we must begin our Sunday by the evening and continue it unto the next evening like to the fashion of the Iewes who rekoned so the houres of their Sabbath And so is this time stinted by the Authour of the 251. Sermon de Tempore in S. Augustines workes Others will have it to begin by the morning at the same time that our Lord Iesus Christ rose from the dead and to end at the next morning and there are some which hold that the Iewes ordered so their Sabbaths We finde others who beleeve that God obliged not his people on the Sabbath day to a cessation from all workes saving from the rising till the going down of the Sun The one and the other have arguments for their opinions but which want a sufficient perspicuitie to give a full satisfaction and resolution to a Christian about the time when he must begin to forbeare all bodily and servile workes least he should profane the Sabbath day by doing them in a part thereof 5 And so he shall be perpetually troubled in his minde with that difficultie and farre more with the exact abstinence which is required of him An unnecessary walke a bodily action about something concerning this present life which he hath done by occasion will disquiet him If he hath put his hand how little soever to the doing of any temporall and earthly thing without urgent necessity if he have given but one stitch with a needle hath fastened a button to a garment if he hath swung a broome about his chamber wiped a vessell dusted his apparell or done any other thing which he might have done the day before or put off till the next day he shall stagger and make a question whether he hath broken the Sabbath or not 6 Yea although the defenders of this opinion avouch that it is lawfull to eat drinke sleepe on the Sabbath day because these are workes of charity and are necessary to every man for his subsistence yet seeing the sanctification of the Sabbath consists not in such actions and they are not permitted but in case of present necessity I know not if according to their maximes a person that can well enough and without incommoditie be without meat drinke sleepe all that day or at least can well enough away with lesse meat drinke and sleepe must not be grieved and pestered in his spirit and feare lest he hath profaned and broken the Sabbath in bestowing too much time to eat drinke and sleepe and giving to his refection and sleepe a portion of time which he might have set a part for religious actions As if he hath beene halfe an houre at table whereas a quarter of an houre might have beene sufficient If he hath slept six or seven houres when a nap of three or foure houres might have served his turne In summe no bodily thing can bee done which shall not afford an hundred difficulties and matter of great doubtes and scruples of conscience Experience sheweth often in many which are made to beleeve that it is not lawfull to doe any worke on the Sabbath day according to the precise tearmes of the fourth Commandement pitifull carkes strange scruples and troubles of conscience a superstitious precisenesse tending to the detriment not onely of the quietnesse and peace of God that should be in their soules but also of the families whereof they are members and of the Common-wealth wherein they live 7 Nay the Doctors that are the broachers and teachers of this opinion intangle themselves and their followers in the explication of the workes that are permitted or forbidden on the Sabbath day They prescribe so many limitations upon divers actions of temporall callings that may bee done so but not so after this manner not after that manner in that respect not in this respect that to pause on their minced distinctions is to runne into a labyrinth of most intricate difficulties and inextricable vexations of spirit Verily I beleeve that the observation of the Iewish Sabbath day was not so onerous and full of difficulties as is the observation of Sunday wherewith many of these Doctors seeke to master and bring under the consciences of Christians 8 To verifie that I have said by some instances First the foresaid Doctors agree not among themselves about the obligation of Christians to abstaine from all bodily and worldly workes whether it be as exact and precise under the New Testament as it was ordinarily to the Iewes under the Old Testament whether we be in the same servitude that they were in or if they in that respect injoyed the same liberty that we possesse under the Gospell For there be some among them that deny it and doe say that the rigorous observation of the Sabbath prescribed of old to the Iewes is abrogated and the prohibitions to kindle the fire to make meat ready and other such like which they acknowledge to have beene perpetuall
established for the publike exercises of religion neverthelesse because Sunday hath beene alwayes used in the Christian Church for a day of divine service and all religious exercises he ought not to forbeare to apply himselfe unto them privately on that day with greater assiduity than on other dayes And because where there is an order and discipline established the Rulers of the State and of the Church to prevent all disorders and stirre up greater respect to the exercises of religion which are practised on Sunday have thought fit to forbid on that day the publike and ordinary workes of the other dayes of the weeke he shall doe well to refraine on it from the ordinary workes of his worldly trade and calling to obey these high powers that God hath subjected him unto It is then the order of the Church principally that must be to every Christian the rule of the abstinence and cessation from ordinary workes that he is to observe on Sunday or on another day That is he must not apply himselfe to such workes without great necessity during all the time wherein this order calleth upon him to resort to the house of God to come to the holy assemblies not to sit idle not to busie himselfe about bodily occupations when he ought to be in the congregation hearing the word of God with attention praying and singing with heart and mouth to the Lord in the company of his faithfull brethren If divine service be publikely practised before and after noone in the Church whereof he is a member he must not soothe himselfe with a fond opinion that he hath done his duty when he hath beene present at either of them and forsaken one of the two to bestow it on some other thing That time ordained by the Church being expired and the whole service of that day finished when he is come home and is alone he is free to doe what he will so it be honest and lawfull to worke or to refresh himselfe for in that he sinneth not against God transgresseth not his Commandements If he will passe the rest of the day in actions of religion he shall do well if he will spend it on other ordinarie and common actions of this life he shall not doe ill with this proviso that he be carefull to prepare himselfe by religious meditations for the publike and holy exercises before they begin and take time to call them to minde after they are ended that so he may make them faithfull and profitable to his soule feele in his heart their efficacie and shew it by an holy conversation in the whole sway of his life Otherwise the wicked one shall come and catch away that which was sowne in his heart Matt. 13. v. 19. 6 All that can and should be propounded to teach us how wee ought to sanctifie the Lords day must be grounded upon the necessitie holinesse and utility of the religious exercises of divine service upon the respect due unto them and upon the authority of the Church commanding upon these grounds This is the only reason of the sanctification of that day In this is the strength of all the arguments whereby Gods servants ought to stirre up devotion in the hearts of their hearers And not in the nature of the day wherein God is publikely served not also in any obligation whereby the conscience is tied unto it Those that feare God and have respect unto his Commandements will not omit the observation of this day although they be informed that it obligeth them not neither of it self nor also by a divine commandement more than another day For it is not the day that they regard but the great need they have to be instructed comforted fortified in the knowledge of God in the love of his glorious Majestie in true godlinesse by the exercises which God hath ordained to that end not onely particular at home which they may doe at all times as they shall have occasion but also publike in the Church in any day whatsoever the Church shall appoint 7 On the other side those that have not the love God and of the exercises of religion in their hearts will never be moved to give their minde with more affection and assiduity to Gods service by beleeving that Sunday is a day of Gods owne institution For if they make no account of that which is the principall and the end which God hath injoyned and urgeth so carefully what reckoning can they make of a thing which putting the case it were a divine institution could not injoy that prerogative saving as a helpe and a meanes tending to that end If they should cover their forsaking of Gods service and of the holy exercises on Sunday with this pretext that it is not a divine institution should they not discover a manifest profanenesse for as much as that under a slight frivolous pretence they should disdaine that which they cannot be ignorant of but that God hath ordained it to wit the holy convocations the communion of the faithfull in them his word his Sacraments the publike calling upon his name Such profane ones must be left to the judgement of God who will finde them out in his owne time 8 As for the true faithfull the glory of God and their owne salvation being their principall end they will alwayes keepe religiously and chearefully all things whereby they come to their end First the meanes which essentially and by Gods ordinance belong unto it such as are the exercises of religion particular and publike Next those which being in themselves indifferent and having no obligatorie power over the conscience by a divine commandement are notwithstanding lawfully established by the Church for orders sake and to set forth the former by ordinary practice such as is the institution of Sunday By which behaviour they shall draw upon themselves from the Father of lights the blessing of grace during their abode in these low parts of the earth and of glory in heaven through the precious merits of our onely Saviour and Redeemer Iesus Christ to whom with the Father and the holy Ghost be all honour glory and praise for ever and ever AMEN A CONFIRMATION OF THE THINGS CONTAINED IN THE PRECEDING TREATISE BY humane Authorities THat the world may not thinke that in my tenets and proofes I have onely set down that which in my owne judgement I thought to be warrantable by the word of God and reason which are the chiefest foundations on which we ought to build I thought it not unfit for the further confirmation of the premisses to adde as an Appendix to my former Discourse some Passages of learned Writers both ancient and moderne especially of the reformed Churches who were first both in time and worth and who deservedly have great credit and authority amongst us In quoting the Passages I shall reduce them to the chiefe heads of my Treatise PASSAGES Concerning the nature and beginning of the Sabbath IUSTIN Martyr in Dialogo