6â— saith that because the people are perswaded that none ought to travaile with horses and wagons upon the Lords day and that nothing might be done in dressing of meat or making clean of houses which thing appeares plainly to belong rather to the Iewish then to the Christian observation of the day we appoint therefore that what was heretofore lawfull shall still be lawfull only we think fit that men abstaine from workes of husbandry that so they may the better attend the exercises of the publique worship A f Haec sunt festa in quibus prohibitis aliis operibus conreduntur opera agriculturae carucarum viz omnes diâ—s dominicae c. Syn. Oxon. Synod also held in our own land at OXFORD doth allow both husbandmen Carmen to follow their imployments even upon this day We need not goe beyond our own memory for who knowes not that Markets and Fayres were usually kept upon the Lords day some good space in the raigne of Queene Elizabeth and how afterwards Parliamentary Lawes provided to haue the Lords day kept as it is now in use that to rectifie mens judgements and to settle their consciences his Majesties Declaration hath since been published Ob. If any man reply as our Saviour upon another occasion did to the Pharisees * Math. 19.8 Non fuit sic à principio It was long so and the longer the worser but it was not so from the beginning Sol. I appeale to Ignatius who for ought I know is the the most ancient and authentique witnesse that can in this case be produced Let us keep the Lords day saith he no longer after the Iewish manner with cessation from works for he that doth not labour let him not eat and God hath commanded us in the sweat of our faces to eat our bread First he condemneth all Iewish Sabbathizing in generall Secondly he makes cessation from works to be a part of Iudaisme Thirdly he proues by two places of Scripture that Christian men may lawfully and with a good conscience work upon the Lords day The one taken out of * Gen. 3.19 Moses In the sweat of thy face thou shalt eat bread the other out of the Apostle grounded on that of Moses * Ep. ad Magnes He that will not labour let him not eat * 2. Thes 3.10 It was then lawfull to work on the Lords day why is it not now Vnlesse the Lawes of the Church and State haue since inhibited them Eightly Though it be a thing in it selfe lawfull to labour upon the Lords day unlesse in prohibited cases by the publique Magistrate yet it is not unlawfull for any to obserue it with as great strictnesse as ever the Iewes did so that his observation be accompanyed with these conditions First that we haue no opinion that such a rest is of necessitie to be observed under paine of sinne putting Religion therein for then the conscience is ensnared and our rest is not religious but superstitious For though the Dictates of an erroneous conscience be to be obey'd and therein a man doth well yet his conscience therein subjects it selfe to an Idoll fancie or Chymâ—ra of its own making and so a man doth ill Secondly that when we thus practise it in our own particulars we neither labour to draw others into the like nor presume to condemne those that are contrary minded For by the former we shall betray an unquiet spirit in our selues and may become authors of evill unto our brethren and by the latter we break the common peace and uniformity of the Church wherein we liue and being guilty of schisme become evill members both of the Church and State With these cautions Vnusquisque abundet sensu suo Every man may doe as he listeth For the Law of the Magistrate allowing works of any kinde serious or lusorious doth not forbid any man to forbeare them Lastly any work of what kinde soever which may be beneficiall unto any in a speciall and extraordinary manner the benefit whereof would be utterly lost were the present opportunity neglected may lawfully be done upon the Lords day unlesse some circumstance adhere thereunto which may make it unexpedient as in case of scandall or the like For example the husbandman may lawfull saue his corne in the time of long dangerous unseasonable weather Fisher-men may doe well to take Fish offering themselues upon the Coast upon the Lords day which would be carried away the next tide to which adde drawing of Cole-pits and Mines travailing of publique Posts the sittings and consultations of the Councels of State c. This also is consented unto in regard of some of the particulars even by our adversaries themselues as in cases of Mines and publique Posts But upon what grounds they should dissent from us in the latter I understand not unlesse they will condemne themselues in those things which they doe allow Ob. Perhaps it will be said that those former works are imployments of extraordinary consequence which is equivalent to extreme necessity Resp But let things be impartially considered and compared together it will appeare to be otherwise at least many times I conceiue a greater benefit may redound to the Common-wealth by a Shole of fish taken upon the Lords day then doth many times by a packet of Letters brought by a publique Post a day sooner then otherwise The substance of the Letters may perhaps be of great importance most times though not alwayes but the comming of them upon the Lords day may not be so So the saving of Corne in hazardous weather may sometimes happen to be a greater benefit to the state then the assembling of the Councell of State and conferring together for some short time Ob. But say they what if a present benefit offer it selfe he is very earthly minded and neerely allied unto prophane Esau that will not denie himselfe all advantages where the Lords honour is so highly interested as it is in this particular Nay it argueth not only a carnall minde but an heart full of vnbeleife For may not the Lord and will he not think we make a recompence of all such losses sustained in Contemplation meerely of his holy Sabbath Resp These be I confesse goodly popular shewes but empty of substance and a begging of the question For were such precise restings under any precept of God or the Magistrate Gods deputy the honour of the Lord were indeed engaged therein and we should for his sake wholy deny our selues without all hope of recompence though never any man was a looser in this kind but let it be first proved that such an utter cessation as is here spoken of is that wherein the Lords honour is any way engaged Sure I am the arguments already produced doe not conclude it CAP. XXV The Arguments brought for the affirmatiue are answered and in particular that which is drawne from the Iudgements of God is handled more at large THese Conclusions being thus premised
which I answere that such outward worship in publique coÌ„gregations should not have been required in that state of innocency for then the whole world should have been but one temple and all men therein but one Congregation as the glorified Saints make but one Quire whose antheme is day and night Praise Honour Glory and Power be to him that sitteth on the throne Wee may well conceive that if Adam had not fallen our estate should have been much like though much inferiour to the Saints in glory I know that b Aquin. pare 1. q. 44. art 31. Schoolemen commonly teach that Adam in the state of innocency should have beene a priest a Prophet and a King having to this purpose a personall kind of knowledge imparted unto him enabling him to be the head and teacher of all mankind But this being grounded upon a false principle viz That his originall righteousnesse of which his knowledge was a part was a supernaturall endowment superadded to the estate of pure naturalls must needs be a consequent like the antecedent out of which it is deduced Order then should have been in that estate for so there is amongst the Angels but no division of men into pastorall charges and congregations which neither are amongst the Angels nor shall be hereafter amongst the glorified Saints The precept therefore of the Sabbath to be observed by Adam in Paradise was in all respects superfluous Ergo. Secondly it is generally affirmed by c In principle mundi ipsi Adae Evae legem dedit ne defructu arboris plantatae in medio paradisi ederent quae lex iâ— sufficeret se esset custodita Tert. ad Iud. Divines ancient and moderne that Adam in the estate of innocency had but one positive law imposed upon him even that of the forbidden fruit neither doe we read of more in Scripture And this we commonly say with d Hoc tam leve preceptum ad observandum tam breve ad memoriâ retinenduÌ„ tanto 〈◊〉 inju titiâ violatum est quanto saciliori possit obser vantia custodiri Aug. â—e Câ—vâ—t l. 14. c. 15. S. Augustine made his disobedience the greater God requiring no more at his hands but if Adam had a commandement to observe the Sabbath God gave him more positive Lawes then one Ergo. If any man say he needed no positive law for the Sabbath being bound thereunto by the light of nature for nature teacheth men to keepe holy unto God those daies upon which they have received greatest mercies for this guided even the Heathens to their holydaies Answere I answere indeed that nature teacheth men thankfully to acknowledge Gods mercies but how and in what manner it must be done or that the same day must be kept holy upon which we receive them nature teacheth not For by this reason Adam should have kept the sixt day for in it he received from the hands of God an helper meet for him in it he and his wife received a blessing upon their Creation and full power and dominion over all creatures being thereby enstalled the happy Princes of the whole world Object If any say that though God did all this for them on the sixt day yet he had not given the operative power of propagation to the whole creation till the seventh day and without this their former day was nothing worth Answere I answere that indeed a In hoc discordat nostra translatio ab alia quam augustinus exponit nostrâ enim translatione consummatio operum oscribitur diei septimo in alia diei sexto utâ—â— autem veritatemâ—â—here potest distinguenda est rei duplex perfectio c. super sent l. 2. c. â— 15. 9 3. Aquinas both in his summes and upon the sentences affirmeth as much There is saith he a two-fold perfection the one wherein things receive their perfect being this all things had upon the sixt day the other which regardeth not the being but only the operation of things in being this was bestowed on creatures the seventh day for then God resting from giving being unto things began to set nature to the worke of propagation but any man may see First that this is only said without any ground Secondly that he was forced thereunto by labouring to reconcile the vulgar translation with that of Saint Austin the one reading in the seventh day the other in the sixt day God ended his worke Gen. 2.2 But what a small fly this is to choak so great a Camel will soone appeare for the text meaneth not that God did any thing upon the seventh day as Aquinas conceived but that b Inde ab hoc die destitit ab omni opificio Trem. in iâ—cum when the seventh day was come all things were finished nothing being defective either in regard of the first or second perfections of which the distinction speaketh Adam therefore had all things perfected and so delivered into his hands on the sixt day And c Hoc loco non dicit Deus rebus ipsis benedixisse sed diei Est 2. Dist 15. art 9. one observes rightly that the text saith God blessed the day not the creatures so that if it were true that nature binds us to keepe those very daies on which we have received mercies Adam was obliged to the Friday which I thinke no man will presume to affirme Thirdly whatsoever was commanded Adam in paradise was universally commanded unto all mankind in all their generations for we were all in Adam neither had our first parents any personall or temporary precept but the Law of the seventh-day Sabbath is of no such universall extent neither is it still in force The first appears because the d So Moses The Lord hath given you the Sabbath Exod. 16.29 So Nehemiah thou madest knowne unto them thy holy Sabbath by the hand of Moses thy servant Neb. 9.14 So Ezek. 20.12 reckoning up Gods favours to that nation saith moreover I gave them also my Sabbaths Scriptures doe ever appropriate the Sabbath as a peculiar rite prescribed the Iewes The second is also manifest for we observe not at this day that Sabbath which is said to have been given Adam which we must have done had it been commanded in paradise unlesse we could shew expresse precepts given to Adam to the contrary but such a countermaine certaine it is Adam never received Fourthly that which is eyther naturall or commanded in Paradise before the fall was not to be abrogated by Christ in the fulnesse of time the reason hereof is because that fulnesse of time wherein Christ came and did all things appertaining to the Messias is to be reckoned from the promise of the seed which was not made till after the fall that therefore which preceeded this promise appertained not to the Messias either to establish or abolish but the observation of that Sabbath which is pretended to have been commanded Adam in paradise is abrogated by Christ as he is the Messias even that day on
which God rested and which he sanctified which the Church of Christ neither doth nor ought to keep Ergo. Fiftly if the Sabbath had been observed by the Patriarches before Moses it is no way likely but that some footsteps of such their observation would have appeared in the Story wherein many things of lesse weight lesse tending to edification are punctually recited In the first sacrifice Moses observes the names of the men the quality of their oblations the successe of both All men know that the fittest time for such observances was the Sabbath would Moses think you haue omitted this circumstance who is so exact in all other For ' its most congruous to think if they had then a Sabbath they would have offered their Sacrifices chiefly upon that Sabbath In the daies of Seth men began to call upon the name of the Lord replanting and reforming religion every man will acknowledge that the observation of the Sabbath is a maine point of reformation and therefore sure if their fore-fathers had ever observed a Sabbath day that especially defaced no question among other things would have been reformed and this had been a materiall point in the story which yet speakes nothing thereof It is afterwards said that Noah offered a sacrifice of rest what fitter time for a sacrifice of rest then the day of rest But had this sacrifice of rest been offered upon the day of rest it had been as remarkable a thing in the story as that he builded an altar and offered of every beast and every fowle yet not a word hereof Come to Abraham we read of many Altars which he made to call upon the name of the Lord a world of small things are recorded of him yet no mention of any Sabbath which he ever observed If he had been bound to any set Sabbath doubtlesse he would have sealed the promises of God unto himselfe and his family upon that day especially but the Texttels us He circumcised himselfe and his houshold the selfe same day in which the Lord talked with him It is hard to proue that this was the seventh-day Sabbath and suppose it every man will confesse it to be an important circumstance which yet we read not The story of Iacob is full and exact but neither in his flight to Padan-Aram nor in his returne to Canaan nor going up to Bethel upon speciall command and reforming his houshold nor going down into Egypt nor in his abode there the least mention is made of a Sabbath observed by him I confesse that a negative argument from authority doth not conclude de rebus agendis to shew what is or is not to be done but de rebus actis to prove what was or was not done with such a concurrence of circumstances of times places persons occasions in this case I say a negative argument is more then probable a Lâ—gant proserant aliquem ducem norbarum praecepisse ut arrup to oppido naâ—us serireâ—ur qui in illo out in illo teÌ„plo suisset inventus de civ lib. 1. c. 6. Saint Austin thinkes it strong enough even against Heathens for being to prove that Christian religion is indeed the true religion and came from God he useth this medium because the barbarous Gothes in all their bloody conquests in Italy Spaine and Africa spared the temple of Christians and all such as fled unto them for sanctuary which was never vouchsafed in any conquests to the Idolatrous worshippers of Heathen Gods But how doth this appeare His proofe is only negative from authority let men saith b An illi saciebant et scriptores earunden rerum gestarum isla rettechantâ— It inc vero qui ea quâ— laudarent maxime requir ebant ill a praeclarissima pietatis indicia praeteâ—nent lb. c. 6. he read and alleadge any such example was any such thing done and did their historians hold their peace what would they who diligently sought for matter and occasion to commend the states and persons of whom they write passe over in silence such excellent monuments of piety Sure if this argument of Saint Austin be strong enough ours much more for the Holy Ghost omits not any thing in the story of the Saints which might apparently make for the pious instructions of after ages Sixtly had the Sabbath been so anciently observed by the Patriarches in all likely hood either Moses or some of the Prophets would have reproved the profanation and pressed the observation thereof upon the Israelites from their practice and examples I am sure Nehemiah doth so after the Law was given Nehem. 13.17 Then reproved I the rulers of Iudah and said unto them what evill thing is this that you doe and breake the Sabbath day did not your fathers thus and our God brought all this plague upon us Certaine also it is that the Israelites were superstitious observers of their fathers especially of Abraham Isaac and Iacob They eate not of the sinew that shranke in the hollow of his thigh unto this day saith Moses But neither Moses nor any of the Prophets though in other things they make frequent mention of their forefathers examples speake a syllable of this upon any occasion ergo Lastly this opinion is supported by men of farre greater authority then the former c Instituta legalia quae in typo data sunt populo Jsrael Orig. Hom. 5. in Num. Gen. 32.32 Origen reckons it amongst those legalls instituted by Moses and given unto Israell as types Tertullians treatise against the Iewes is nothing but the relation of a conference which passed betweene him and a Iew in which hee proves that the legall ceremonies of Moses are no way necessary unto salvation and amongst the rest d Qui contendunt Sabbathum adhuc observandum quasi salutis medelam doceant in praeteritum iustos Sabbatizasse Et paulo post Doceant sicut iam prâ—locuti sumus Adam Sabbatizasse ant Abel c. Tert adv Iuâ— daeos Sed dicturi sunt Iudaei ex quo hoc praeceptum datum est Per Mosen exin de observan dum suisse hee speakes of the Sabbath saying let them shew us that Adam or Abel or Enoch or Noah or Abraham or Melchisedech received the precept of the Sabbath Having made this challenge hee brings in the Iew replying that because it was given to Moses therefore it was to bee observed of all nations in Tertullians time therefore this truth was acknowledged even by the Iewes themselves To this purpose also is e Dicit Rabbi magister observatio Sabbathi in lege fuit instituta ut in fide po puli firmitèr permaneret novit is mundi Tho. in l. 2. Sent. dist 15. art 3. Rabbi Moses cited by Aquinas that the observation of the Sabbath was instituted in the Law S. f Cessanti a servilibus operibus populo iubetur ut dies Sabbathi sanctificet Cypr. de spirit Sancto Cyprian following the foot-steps of his master saith that it was commanded the
more for edification and the Arguments to the contrary doe not conclude To the first true it is indeed that God himselfe in Scripture imposeth the name Sabbath upon all daies of publique worship in the Iewish Synagogue and the reason was because the very corporall rest was a chiefe thing aimed at in them being both memorative of some things passed and figurative of things also to come But that therefore the daies also of Christian Assemblies should be so called doth not follow because the reason is not the same as shall appear in it's proper place The name Sabbath therefore is no more Morall and to be retained in the times of the Gospell then the name Priest Altar Sacrifice which perhaps our adversaries themselves will allow of in a common large and Analogicall construction If therefore we look to the e Si vocis primaevam significationem spectemus Sabbathum erit omnis dies festus At Scripturae consuetudine Sabbathi nomâ— ferè appropriatum est diei septimo Estius 3. Sent. d. 37. first and originall signification of the word every Holy-day wherein men rest from their labours and attend the publique worship may be called a Sabbath but if we look at the application of it in Scripture we shall find it appropriated in the first and chiefest sense to the Sabbath day or Satturday in the fourth commandements in the next and subordinate construction to all the Iewish festivals never to the Lords day To the second No man will deny but that antiquity is a good guide in the search of the truth for all errors are upstarts even those that are gray-headed The f Ier. 6.16 Prophet therefore adviseth to ask for the the old way which is the good way but his meaning is that which is simply old not comparatively only The corrupt Glosses of the Pharisees were very ancient * Math. 5.38 Ye have heard that it was said to them of old time an eye for an eye The superstitions of the Romanists are like so many old aches in the body of the Church yet as the one so also the other meere novelties in religion Should I grant the name Sabbath as applyed to the Christian Feast to be of some good standing yet without all Controversy it was not known to the true Primitive times Indeed antiquity ever used one of these foure either Sunday not from g ' Dum solâ—s lâ—ttâ—iae indulgemus longè aliâ ratione quam religione solis Tert. Ap. cap. 16. the Sunne in the firmament but h Mal. 4.2 the Sonne of Righteousnesse with healing in his wings or the Day of light from the Sacrament of Baptisme called by the Fathers our Illumination or the Day of Bread not from holy bread as Papists now use it but from the other Sacrament of the Supper administred every Lords day or the Lords day which doth and will continue to the worlds end To the third The name Sabbath doth not best acquaint us with the Nature of the Lords day as is pretended For the nature thereof consisteth not either in our corporall or Spirituall Rest or in Remembring the Rest of God in the Creation or in being a pledge unto us of our eternall rest All these are accidentall considerations of the Lords day Indeed the memory of Christs resurrection is essentiall thereunto but not so much in regard of his rest as of his conquest over death and the grave and being made the Lord of the Quick and the Dead It being therefore the Lordship of Christ made evident to all creatures both in heaven and in earth by the Glory of his Resurrection which is then celebrated it ought to be stiled the Lords day not a Sabbath To the fourth What the duties of the day be we shall see hereafter Let it be granted therefore for the present whatsoever the Argument doth suggest the consequent is denied For whatsoever duties are then performed are or at the least ought to be directed in a speciall manner unto the Lord Christ as our service of him The day therefore is to be named not from the nature of the things done but from the quality of the person to whom they are intended and therefore not Sabbath but Lords day And whereas it is said that the name Sabbath may serve to confirme our faith and hope of our eternall Rest I answere that indeed it may be so used by us but was never so intended in the first institution thereof and being a consideration so remote it cannot claime to denominate To the fifth It is indeed most rue that we ought not especially in matters of Religion to innovate though but words and Phrases although perhaps insignificant and improper much lesse ought we to swarve from such language as is most savory and religious but which name hath most salt the Sabbath or Lords day I hope it doth appear by this which hath been said And who speaks most Religiously the Apostles and the whole Church or some few private persons of late yeares is easy to determine CHAP. 14. Wherein the Question concerning the duration of the day is proposed and the arguments for the day naturall are set down AMongst those things which disquiet and perplexe the consciences of the weak concerning the Lords day this is not the least where it is to begin and how long it lasteth For God requiring of us perfect and entire obedience without diminution or defalcation and h Iames 2.10 S. Iames saying that he that faileth in one point is guilty of all unlesse every minute of time which the Lord requireth of us as his tribute and homage be duly tendred to him our whole labour bestowed upon the parts and peices of the day is not regarded It is also that which concernes the most sort of our inferiour people to be satisfied in leâ—st the Commandement requiring one thing their employments another they many times wound their Consciences and rob themselves of that peace which otherwise they might enjoy We must therefore before we proceed any farther inquire whether the Lords day be to consist of any certain determinate number of houres as being a Naturall day or Artificiall And here our Adversaries are very positive that the Christian mans Sabbath as well as that of the Iewes is to consist of full twenty foure houres and they have these reasons First all the time that the Commandement requires is to be observed But that the Commandement of the Sabbath requires a whole naturall day from evening to evening is undenyable Therefore c. If any man say the Commandement was Ceremoniall and so proves nothing for the Christian observation it may be replied that this being granted of all the other branches yet it is not so in this For no man can shew how the time of twenty foure houres can be in any respect mysticall Though therefore the rest of the latter should vanish as a shadow yet in this particular it must needs continue Morall Secondly no one
can be no better then a snare to weak Consciences there being no certainty wherein to fasten CHAP. XVI Wherein something concerning the day naturall and artificiall being premised the former arguments are briefly answered TO give better satisfaction to weak and unstable minds we must know what a Naturall day is and where it is to begin where to end Some have of late fondly denied this distinction because it is not found as they think in Scripture And indeed the termes Naturall and Artificiall are not there read but what matter is it for sounds and syllables if we have the sence and substance a Math. 28 2â— St Mathew is plaine that it was the end of the Sabbath when the first day of the week began to dawn so that all that night untill the dawning of the first day was part of the Sabbath which were not possible without the distinction of Naturall and Artificiall Ob. If any say that the Iewes kept their Sabbath from evening to evening and therefore that the night following could be no part of the Sabbath Sol. I answere that S. Matthew in that place speaks not according as the Iewes accounted from evening to evening but as the Romanes from morning which was a naturall day of twenty-foure houres But not to spend time in so needlesse a point we must proceed to enquire where the naturall is to begin and end In this there is no small variety of opinions Astronomers begin at noon b Manè diem Gens Graecorum incipit astra sequentes in medio lucis Iudaei vespere sancta inchoat ecclesia medio sub tempore noctis Iewes at Sun-set the Grecians at morning the c Dies naturalis secundum ecclesiam Romanam incipit à mediâ nocte Aqui parte 3. q. 8. ad 5. Church of Rome with the Vmbrians at Mid-night But this is to find knots as they say in Bulrushes For if the naturall day be measured by the revolution of the Sunne as all confesse sure it is that untill the Sunne begin his course the day cannot begin At what time now did the Sunne set forth upon the fourth day at the creation Common reason will say when he first appeared in the Horizon the rising therefore of the Sunne in the Horizon must needs be the first period of the naturall day And so the words of d Gen. 1.5 Moses are to be understood saying the evening and the morning were the first day that is the shutting up of the day which is there called the evening and the begining of the next there called the morning e Permittitur autem vespere quia cum à luce dies inciperet priùs terminus occurrit lucis quod est vespere quam terminus noctis quod est mane vel secundum Chrysost ut designetur quòd dies naturalis non terminatur in verspere sed in maâ—e Aquin. parte 1. q. 74. art 3. ad 6. was the first day The words also of S. Mathew before cited make it apparent in which not only midnight but to the very dawning belonged not to the first but last day of the week It was not of it but towards it as the end of one contiguum is the begining of another By all which it is apparent that when God commanded the Iewes their Sabbaths from evening to evening the order of the naturall day was inverted by him not so much looking to the number of foure and twenty houres as to the time of Israels deliverance out of Egypt which began when the Passover was eaten at even of which their deliverance the Sabbath is a memoriall as hath been said Some thing also must be said of the day Artificiall which we may define to be a certain proportion of houres appointed by men and employed by Artificers about their crafts and trades This is not the whole time between Sunne and Sunne but generally I think conceived by all nations to be measured by twelve houres according to that of our Saviour * Iohn 11.9 Are there not twelve houres of the day And as the * Math. 27. Evangelist describes the passion of Christ by the third sixt and ninth houres Having thus briefly set down the day Naturall and Artificiall whereas it is generally supposed by all men almost that the Lords day must be measured by one of these two proportions of houres the truth is there is no such portion of time set us in the New Testament which alone can direct us in the Lords day neither expresly nor implicitly Vnlesse therefore we will have recourse unto the Iewish Sabbath and begin the observation thereof over night and that Analogically because Christ himselfe our Passover was sacrificed at Evening and our Redemption from the spirituall Egypt set on foot the Conscience hath no ground to settle upon But what warrant Christians have to follow the Iewes in observing the Lords day in regard of any circumstantialls I see not And that Analogicall respect before spoken of between the sacrificing of ours and their Passover cannot bind the conscience The whole therefore is left to the Church and Magistrates under the Gospell the time being such by their appointment as may be convenient for the publique worship of God neither doe the Arguments to the contrary conclude To the first the Iewes indeed were prescribed a naturall day not properly but equivocally so called consisting of twenty foure houres but that the time which limited them doth also limit us is utterly untrue And whereas it is said that the twenty-foure hovres were no way Mysticall or Ceremoniall It will be replyed that though the number of houres spoken of which are not so much as mentioned in Scripture was in no respect mysticall yet the time named from evening to evening was partly memorative looking to the time of their deliverance out of Egypt partly positive looking to the publique worship the morning and the evening sacrifice which concernes not us but only in a proportion For as the Iewes worshipped the Lord upon the day of their Sabbath and had set times of assembling themselves on that day both morning and evening so it is fit and convenient that the Christians also worship the Lord in their publique assemblies both in the begining and towards the evening of their Lords day To the second A day may have a twofold consideration the one Absolute as it is a day the other Relative as appointed for any use or service The fifth of November may be considered either as such a day of such a moneth and so it 's neither longer or shorter then any other naturall day or as a day set apart by the Church for publique thanksgiving and so it consists only of a morning as appears by the Statute from whence it hath authority The case is the same in the Lords day which continueth no longer then the duties of the day require To the third the saying of the Rabbines is a good admonition to all men not to abbreviat
or lessen the time appointed by the Church for holy duties but this makes no more for twenty foure houres then it doth for forty or fifty or any other It is all men will confesse sacriledge to rob God of his time but it must be made to appear that God hath claimed unto himselfe this time in question till when nothing can be concluded The fourth indeed were unanswerable if the case were as is pretended between us and the Iewes But First the ground upon which this argument is builded is sandy for it supposeth that God appointed them from Evening to Evening to contemplate the mysteries of Godlinesse and mercies vouchsafed unto them whereas it was both memorative and mysticall as hath been proved neither did they spend the night of their Sabbath in contemplation but in bodily Rest Secondly it is utterly untrue that we under the Gospell have more work for the Lords day then the Iewes had for their Sabbath For as e Lib. 4. c. 4. Eusebius observes their religion was the same with Christian Religion which at this day we professe f 1. Cor. 10.2 For they all were baptized unto Moses and did all eat of the same spirituall meat and drink of the same spirituall Rock which was Christ his meaning is that the body and substance was the same only it was cloathed with many shadowes and as the Apostle cals them * Gal. 4.9 Beggarly rudiments so that their Sabbath daies work was in this respect as much as our Lords can be Thirdly I say it was much greater for how cumbersome was Gods worship to them by Sacrificings Purifyings Washings How did God seem to hide himselfe and his mercies from them in Types and figures whereas he reveales himselfe to us even in the face of Iesus Christ * 2. Cor. 3. And not only Moses had a vaile put upon him * 3.15 but also their hearts which remaineth unto this day There was also a restraint of Gods spirit unto them as of the raine in the daies of Elias whereas now the fountaine is opened and the spirit powred out All men know that when any thing is enquired after it is sooner found when it lies open then when it is hid by a man of understanding then by a child one that hath eyes to see then by one that is hoodwinked by one that hath many helpes then by one that hath none So is it between the Iewes and us in holy things This argument therefore is a meere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 neither can any more prevaricating reason be produced To the fift it were to be wished that Scripture might be handled if not with more reverence yet with greater gentlenesse not thus to be racked The 92. Psalme was the Psalme of the Sabbath and it makes mention of night and day to be spent in the Lords prayses But what then will any reasonable man imagine that they then had night meetings in the Temple or sate up late in their families that night Those times of morning and evening if we restraine them as spoken of the Sabbath day are metonymically to be understood for the whole worship of God whensoever performed upon that day and are as much as when we say Morning-prayer and Evening-prayer But farther notwithstanding the Psalme was the Sabbath-Psalme yet whatsoever is therein contained may not respectively be spoken of the Sabbath only And this is i Tantùm vult docere nisi nos nostra socordia impediat nunquam deesie argumentum laudandi Deum nec verè defungi officio gratitudinis nisi in eo siâ—â—us assidui sicut ipse bonitatem fidem erga nos perpetuat Calvin in locum Mr Calvins observation upon the very words alleadged affirming that day and night are there put in indefinitely for all times whatsoever as appears saith he by that which followes For his loving kindnesse and his truth are alwaies towards us But as those that have yellow eyes think every thing to be of that colour so these men cannot meet with the Lord to be praised night and day especially in the Sabbath-Psalme but it must presently conclude a foure and twenty houres-Sabbath To the sixt as Gods rest began so must ours is a proposition Atheologicall For the Iewes themselves who observed the Sabbath in imitation of Gods Rest looked not at their patterne in this particular but only at their deliverance out of Egypt into which deliverance they entred when they sacrificed the Passover The example of God is not proposed without limitation in the Commandement he so rested as that he never since returned to his labours from which he rested he so rested as that he blessed it in neither of which ought we to presume to imitate his Rest Lastly I wonder how the example of Gods rest proposed in the Commandement can concerne our Lords day which was not the day of the Lords Rest but the begining of his labours The seventh is not much unlike First therefore we observe not the Lords day in memory of Christs resting in the grave For though in some respects he may then be said to have entred into Rest yet was the grave part of his humiliation also and our Redemption and no compleat and perfect Rest Secondly let it be supposed that the grave to Christ was only a place of Rest and that he entred thereinto over-night what is this to a twenty foure houres-Sabbath unlesse perhaps Christ rested but just so many houres in the Grave but how then was he three daies and three nights in the Bowels of the earth This therefore is a meere pretence no proof The eight drawn from Apostolicall practice is in all parts thereof unsound Plaine it is that Apostolicall practice binds not the conscience but where there is a precept annexed Nay where there is a precept annexed both precept and practice may be as they say ambulatorium in lege of no lasting continuance But in this point we have neither precept nor practice either for the present or for after ages I presume that no man well considering the place alleadged can deny what k Curavit scriptor libri causam producendi sermonem produ cere Aug. epist 86. ad Cus S. Austine long since observed that S. Paul at that time took the advantage of the present occasion and necessity and not otherwise Sure I am that if the Apostles practice there recorded were a president for us to follow neither the whole Church of God can be excused who never since hath observed such a Sabbath nor the Apostle himselfe can be acquitted who for ought we read never did the like before or after in any part of the world Besides all this l Calv. in locum Mr Calvin thinks that the day there spoken of was the Iewes Sabbath not the Lords day reading in stead of uno Sabbathorum quodam Sabbatho upon a certain Sabbath day not Lords day But if any list to be contentions herein sure wee are out of
to understand the text Papists indeed gladly extend it farther but cannot To the three and twentieth that it descended from the Apostles by tradition may with more ease be denied then ever the contrary can be proved But we must remember to distinguish of Apostolicall inspirations and traditions according to the doctrine of the Traditionaries themselves before delivered that it descended from them as Pastors not Apostles as a thing of their owne instituting not of the Lords commanding S. Augustines definition we acknowledge and desire no other Iudge For first it is cleare that d Quo tempore Christiani se à Iudaeis seiunxerunt diem dominicam feâ—iari caeperunt non est memoriae proditum Magd. Cent. 1. lib. 2. c. 6. no man can shew when the Iewes and Christians severed their assemblies Secondly many particular Churches varied one from another in this poynt as it hath been said Thirdly the Lords day was never observed as a Sabbath with cessation from works till Constantines edicts commanded it which were afterwards enlarged or restrained by Ecclesiasticall constitutions That the Primitive Church in the time of persecution observed the Lords day as a Sabbath hath no ground at all in Scripture and is not consonant unto reason because certaine it is that they kept the Iewish Sabbath till the Synagogue was buried Neither is it likely that they kept two daies together or if they did is it probable that neither the Iewes should quarrell at this observation nor the Heathens who derided the Iewes for mispending the seventh part of their lives in idlenesse note it in the Christians over whom they held watchfull eyes Or is it likely that the Primitive Fathers who wrote Apologies for the Church either to the Emperour or against the Gentiles in which they expressed the whole carriage of the Church should never so much as mention this daies observation as taken up and kept as the Iewish Sabbath by divine institution If we consider Sabbath duties named in the argument certaine it is that they preached no more nor so much on that day as they did upon others for this they alwaies did on the Iewes Sabbath because of the concourse of people S. Peters sermon upon the day of Pentecost which was the Lords day was accidentall occasioned by those that mocked at them and their gifts of tongues S. Pauls sermon at Troas hath beene already examined and as for their collections on the Lords day I wonder from whence it should be so generally conceived that they were then either commanded or made S. Paul bids theÌ„ indeed provide a benevolence for the poore Saints at Hierusalem against his comming and that they might be in readinesse he wils every man the * 1 Cor. 16.2 first day of the weeke to lay apart by himselfe not to collect in the assembly So that this being a particular occasion was particularly ordered by the Apostle as their wise Pastor not as a ruled case to bind the Church for ever Nay farther we may affirme that collections are no essentiall duties of the Lords day neither are they so esteemed and used in most congregations living as we doe in a setled estate wherein the law hath provided for the poore in another kind The Sacrament of the supper was indeed constantly administred every Lords day but the reason was no way Sabbatharian for the Sacrament being the badg of Christianity could not be received in the Iewish Synagogue wherein they performed other duties Besides they much mistake which judge of their Communions by ours as if they only received upoÌ„ resting daies with sermons before and collections after they only met together in some private Chamber to break bread without any more adoe And this they did upon the Lords day as most sutable to that service wherein Christ was to be remembred Lastly admitte all the argument requires we have only the ancient practice of the Church but this makes no divine institution by the confession of them that most advance the Churches power e Non ideò aliquid est iuris divini quiâ— olim illud Ecclesâ—a usurpaverit Greg. Val. de Euch. q. 7 the Papists themselves To the foure and twentieth That the Apostles should be guilty themselves and make the Church guilty of so damnable a presumption as this argument speaketh of were indeed a blasphemous consequence but the best is this terrible inference hath no acquaintance at all with the antecedent the reputed Father thereof For what was the presumption of Ieroboam and Antiochus figures of that which shall be practised by Antichrist But the changing of those times which God appointed to be observed by his Church commanding others to be kept in their places and that out of impious and blasphemous intentions to subvert true Religion and to set up Idolatry in the roome thereof Did the Apostles so God forbid But the Iewish Sabbath being expired and having breathed out its last gaspe that the publike worship of God might be upheld with decency and order they commanded the observation of the Lords day unto the Primitive Christians which hath no likenesse at all with those things here spoken of To the five and twentieth It is true that the practise of holy men in Scripture not seconded by precept bindeth not the conscience only their example sheweth us the lawfulnesse and expediency of the things practised upon like occasions with like circumstances and this is our warrant for observing the Lords day But for despising the Saturday-sabbath we have more then the naked practice of the Apostles For in all their Epistles they proclaime all Leviticall ordinances and such was that Sabbath to be ceased under the Gospell Christ who was the substance being come To the six and twentieth Whether Pentecost fell on the Lords day is questioned by some and denied by many their reason is because the fifty daies were to begin the morrow after the Passover Levi. 23.16 But plaine it is that our Saviour did eate the Passover upon Thursday-night and so Saturday the Iewes Sabbath must be the first and last from the fifty daies To avoyde this objection f In Ex. c. 39. Rupertus reads the text Thou shalt account from the next day after the Sabbath understanding it of the Sabbath properly so called or weekely Saturday-sabbath and so our Lords day being the next following is made the first and the last of the fifty But this is a plaine mistake of the text For the first day of unleavened bread being commanded to be a Sabbath is that Sabbath there spoken of from whence they were to begin their account Secondly therefore others interpret those words Thou shalt number fifty dayes from the first day of unleavened bread for not only the first but the last also of those dayes was a Sabbath exclusively shutting out the first day after from the beginning of the number of the fifty and by this meanes they bring it also to be the Lords day But whether doth this hold for
For all these are commended to Christian Liberty in regard of determinating circumstances as where when in what manner how long how often And some of theÌ„ whether at all yet are things of greater importance and haue more probability of Divine precept then bodily cessation on the Lords day Ergo c. Sixtly that which is not so much as mentioned in the new Testament for a Christian duty is not commanded Christian people under the penalty of sinne This must needs be true of all such duties which Christ and the Gospell hath brought in imposed upon the Church as distinguished from the Iewish Synagogue But corporall rest such as our Sabbatharians require upon the Lords day is not so much as mentioned in the new Testament and yet the Lords day the observation thereof was brought in and imposed upon the Church as contra-distinguished from the Iewish Synagogue Ergo c. Seventhly Had this been an immediate Christian duty so essentiall as it 's now made doubtlesse the first Christians living under persecuting Emperours would haue made as great a conscience of this as of any thing else whatsoever Especially because it concern'd the Lord himselfe to whom the day is devoted and persecution maks men stick closest unto Christ and all Christian duties commanded by him But the Primitiue Christians did all manner of works upon the Lords day under the persecuting Emperours unlesse whilst they assembled themselves by stealth to break bread This appeares by Constantines edict against working upon this day wherein notwithstanding are excepted all labours of Husbandry whatsoever It is a true rule that the manners and customes of men are the Mothers of the Lawes of Kings and States A law prohibiting the doing of any thing is a strong presumption that the thing was done especially when the Law is exceptiue Plaine therefore it is by the Law of Constantine who was the first Christian Emperour that the Primitiue Christians made not cessation from works upon the Lords day a matter of conscience Ob. If any man say that Constantine did only reviue the duty which Persecution had almost defaced Sol. I answer that Constantine was not the reviuer but the first enactor of this observation in regard of bodily cessation if not why can it not be shew'd who preceded him herein But let it be that Constantine renewed the Discipline which was decayed it seemes then that the labours of Husbandry then what more toylesome were in use amongst Primitiue Christians upon this day because they are excepted by Constantine which renewed the Discipline of the Church in this behalfe or else Constantine insteed of a reviuer must needs be made a depraver and corrupter Ob. If any man say the nature of the times required this indulgence Sol. I answer that those were the most peacefull and happy times that ever the Church saw But suppose what malignity you please in the times sure I am that nothing can make a sinne to be no sinne or let the conscience loose from any necessary and essentiall duty though but positiuely commanded vnlesse as David did eate the Shew-bread which cannot be averr'd of those times of Constantine Lastly authorities also are not wanting e Cont. Manich lib. 2. Epiphanius against the Manichees saith that God regardeth not outward cessation from works more upon this then any other day because by his providence the Sunne riseth and setteth the Moone waxeth and waneth the Winds blow and Women bring forth as well on this as any other dayes And against Ebion the same f Idem cont Ebion Epiphanius saith that the Disciples plucking the Eares of Corne upon the Sabbath day shewed that the outward rest of the Sabbath was ended when Christ who is our great Sabbath was once come g Cogitans requiem in Deo tuo propter ipsam requiem omnia faciens abstine ab opere â—ervili omnis enim qui facit peccatum servus est peccaâ—i Aug. Ps 32. S. Augustine also upon the 32. Psalme which is mistaken by our Adversaries as speaking against all sorts of works serious and lusory faith We must seeke rest in the Lord our God abstaining from all servile works for he that committeth sinne is the servant of sinne Our servile works are our sinfull works from which to abstaine is all the rest required of us under the Gospell h Luther de bonis operibus Luther expressely faith that the outward rest spoken of in the Commandement is no longer under precept in the profession of Christianity Calvin thinks it strange that man should imagine that God is delighted with bodily cessation And to confesse my ignorance I know none either Protestant or Papist new or old our English Sabbatharians set aside which teach corporall rest to be of it selfe a duty of the day under positiue precept CHAP. XXIV The Question is briefly vnfolded in nine Propositions THE whole question may be easily clear'd in these following propositions First I conceiue it is out of all controversy that the outward rest from all manner of works as it is expressed in the letter of the fourth Commandement was of it selfe precisely considered and without relation to any thing else to the Iewes an especiall duty of religion and part of Gods worship For though it be true which i Calvin in Levit. 19. v. 13. M. Calvin hath observed upon these words of Moses You shall keep my Sabbaths and reverence my Sanctuary that God commanded them cessation from works with reference to the duties of the Sanctuary yet were it also of it selfe a Sabbath-dayes duty For that which is of its selfe and for its owne sake commanded may also be made a subordinate duty to help and further another duty So Prayer which is of it selfe a maine part of Gods worship is made a subordinate help to encrease our dependance upon God and to beget in our hearts an awfull reverence of his Majestie It 's so here for also if it had stood commanded only in relation to the worship of the Sanctuary why were they to begin it over night where as nothing was done in the Sanctuary till the next Morning If any man say that which was done ouer night was only by way of preparation He much deceived himselfe For the preparation is one thing the Sabbath another They had their preparation and their prepreparation which tooke up almost the whole day precedent both of their owne invention But they began not their Sabbath-rest till after Sun-set in the evening And howsoever they imposed many things upon themselues of their owne Traditions by way of Preparation yet the first use and true end thereof was to provide for themselues what to eate upon the Sabbath in which it was unlawfull for them to dresse any thing or so much as to kindle a fire Their over-nights rest had no relation at all to the Sanctuary but to their comming out of Egypt the memory whereof they were commanded to solemnize thereby As therefore unleavened