to divine worship 2. From Papists this Prefacer proceedes to Protestants and tells us that this seemes to be the judgement of the Divines in the Low-Countries for proofe whereof he produceth none but Gomarus and Rivetus both which are well knowne to be opposite in the point of the originall institution of the Sabbath And as touching the morality of one day in seven both Wallaeus and Thysius two professors of Divinity in the University of Leyden are well known to differ from them both and Hyperius a low Countreyman too As for Calvin I have already shewed how he makes nothing for this Prefacer and that they catch advantage from him most unreasonably by dismembring him Wallaeus shewes the same to be the judgement of Martin Luther namely that one day in the weeke at least ought to bee consecrated to Divine Service and out of Melancthon that all the ceremoniality in the fourth Commandement is restrained to the observation of a certaine day that which remaines besides therein commanded continuing morall * In Apoc. 1.10 Beza likewise affirmes that the sanctifying of every seventh day as touching the Service of God is of morall obligation and unremoveable The like Wallaeus shewes to have beene the judgement of Bucer Peter Martyr Zanchy Iunius Viretus Calvins Colleague Danaeus Antonius Fayns Matthias Martinius and in a manner all that have written upon their Belgick Catechisme By this the Reader may consider the modesty of this Prefacer when hee professeth that it seemes to bee the judgement of the Divines in the Low-Countries that one day in seven to be set apart for Gods solemn worship is not of the morality of the fourth Commandement But Wallaeus proceeds and shewes the same to have been the judgement of Vrsinus and Paraeus of the Palatinate of Alstedius Professor at Herborne together with Lansbergius and Festus Hommius all maintaining the morality of one day in seven to bee consecrated to Divine Service And in the close professeth hee could adde the testimonies of many English and Scottish Divines who ever have beene accompted Orthodox concurring in judgement with the former on this point â—â—vestig Sab. cap. 5. sect 4. Last of all consider what is Gomarus his owne opinion to wit that we are not so precisely bound to this proportion of time but that wee may allow a better The condition of Divine worship saith he commanded in the fourth Commandement requires that not only certaine dayes for order and for Gods better service sake be observed but also that sufficient dayes be observed it cannot be inferred from this that God hath not defined a certaine day to us that it is indifferent whether we make choyce of one in fifty or in an hundred or one in a thousand Sect. 5. Then proceeding to define what are sufficient hee acknowledgeth that the dayes set apart for this must bee either as frequent or more frequent then one day in seven And in this answer of Gomarus to an argument of Wallaeus made for the morality of one day in seven doth Rivetus rest Explicat decalog p. 486. namely that to us who are eased of the burthen of Iewish ceremonies the dayes consecrated to Divine Service may be more they may not be fewer And addes of his own that we cannot in charity require of our servants the labour of so many dayes to wit of six without some rest As for the seconds which this Prefacer saith Gomarus brings to wit Vatablus and Wolfgangus Musculus this is nothing to the present purpose For these are not brought in by him in the point of the morality of one day in seven but onely in the point of the originall institution of the Sabbath but this is his jugling course to mendicate some shew of authority to serve his turne where substance falleth him 3. As for the Hollanders who in travailing about the World Westward had lost a day that is came to observe our Christian Sabbath one day too late when this Prefacer askes hereupon what should those people doe when they were returned I will not answer by advising them to travaile the World over againe Eastward that they may finde the day which they had lost by travailing round the World Westward much lesse that they should renew their travailes the same way till they had lost six dayes more that so their Sabbath might concurre with the Sabbath of their Countreymen at home but according to the particulars proposed by him namely to concurre now with their Countrymen a day before their time that so they might make amends for that time which they had lost if any neede of amends and not rather for uniformities sake For when in the dayes of Joshuah the Sunne standing still one day was as long as two dayes yet this was nothing materiall to the altering of their Sabbath much lesse when the Sunne went backe 10. degrees in the diall of Ahaz while King Hezechiah reigned No sober man I thinke will say the morall Law was broken by this though one weeke in Josuahs dayes contained more time by 12. houres then any former weeke and another weeke in King Hezechiahs dayes was found to bee many houres longer then his fellowes THE SECOND DIGRESSION CONSISTING OF TWO PARTS I. In making good Doctor Wallaeus his arguments for the morality of one day in seven against the answer of Doctor Rivetus II. In answering of Doctor Rivetus his arguments directed against the morality of one day in seven NOW whereas Doctor Rivetus about the observation of one day in seven as necessary differeth in opinion from his two Collegues Doctor Thysius and Doctor Walaeus and not so onely but directs himselfe after Gomarus to take into consideration the arguments proposed by Doctor Walaeus for the morality of one day in seven and to accommodate an answer thereunto I thinke it fit not to omit the discussion of that answer of his and that in such sort that I may carry my selfe correspondently to his ingenuous behaviour herein The first argument of Walaeus is this if by the force and analogy of the fourth Commandement it be not rightly collected that one day of seven is to be consecrated to Divine worship then no certaine number or circle of dayes can be limited to the foresaid purpose by any Divine precept seeing in no other precept is found mention of any other number and therefore it shall be lawfull to choose either a thirtieth day or a fiftieth day without transgression of any Divine precept But this is absurd This argument is of great force considering the difference betweene proportion of time allowed unto Divine Service and the difference of the day keeping still the same proportion For every master from the greatest Prince to the meanest housholder expects that his servant should be profitable unto him and accordingly hee expects a certaine proportion of service to bee performed by him as namely a good dayes worke for every day a good weeks worke for every weeke And in every trade
not as so many Angels descending unto us the gracious motions that arise in our hearts upon meditation of his Word of thankesgiving to him of rejoycing in him yea of sorrowing for our sins are they not as so many Angels ascending to him Our teares have a double motion one naturall downwards another spiritual upwards for the Lord puts them into his bottels the hairs of our head are numbred how much more the sighes of our heart and groanes of our spirit And have we not great cause to inure our selves betimes thus to sabbatize with God as he sabbatizeth with us that we may be the fitter to keepe our eternall Sabbath with him for so is our eternall happinesse represented unto us in the enjoying of him for ever Es 66.23 and being filled with his glory which Austin calls a De civit Dei lib. 22. c. 30. Sabbatum maximum our greatest Sabbath and b Quaest supra Exo. quaest 173. 1 Cor. 15.24.28 Plenitudo Sabbati and to that purpose casts his eye upon that Sabbatum Sabbatorum Sabbath of Sabbaths Revel 25. For when Christ hath put downe all rule and all authority and power then shall he deliver up the Kingdome to God even the Father and God shall be all in all Yet I willingly confesse that in my observation two things there are which seeme to be of great moment in opposition to the morality of the fourth Commandement 1. The change of the day 2. The generall opinion of the Fathers pronouncing in an indefinit manner the fourth Commandement to be ceremoniall Yet notwithstanding the registring of it in the Decalogue which is generally accompted the Law morall I say this consideration hath even prevailed more with mee to accompt the substance thereof morall Neverthelesse for the honour I owe and respect I beare to Antiquity I have endevoured to understand the Antients aright and to enquire in what respect they accompted it ceremoniall For to my understanding the sanctification of the rest or the service of the day especially unto us Christians is meerely morall But as concerning the rest it selfe it may be some ceremoniality may be found therein especially considered in conjunction with the time appointed for the worship and service of God And herein I thanke God I have found good satisfaction unto my selfe at last how I shall satisfie others I know not And when sometimes I had waded thorow the Epistle to the Romans unto the fourteenth Chapter there occasion was given me to consider further of this controversie so farre as a few dayes would give libertie to provide my next Sermon and therein I made use of Hospinian and of Pererius and no more as I remember but in Pererius I came acquainted with Tostatus his Arguments directed against the ancient institution of the Sabbath from the Creation which till then I imagined had been generally received without contradiction according to that which the story of Genesis at first sight seemes to commend unto us And by this occasion my mind working hereupon in my meditations I thought fit for opening a way to the better clearing of the truth to distinguish three things in subordination the latter to the former 1. The first was a time in generall to be set apart for Gods service 2. The second was the proportion of this time 3. The third the particularity of the day according to the specified proportion 1. The first seemed to me of necessary duty by the very light of nature to as many as know God and acknowledge him to be their Creator and this I tooke and doe take to be the highest degree of morality in this precept and herein hitherto I have found no opposition 2. As touching the second by light of nature we are somewhat to seeke as whether one day in a weeke or more or one day in a month or more or one day in a yeare or more ought to be set apart for the solemne worship and service of God So that herein it is fit we should expect direction from God the Lord of the Sabbath 1. Because the service of the day is his and it seemes fit he should cut out what proportion of time he thinkes convenient 2. For the maintenance of uniformitie therein and lest otherwise there might be as many divisions hereabouts as there are Churches in the world and contentions also consequently each standing for their owne election For reason of a conjecturall nature is very various and therein commonly affection beares the greatest sway and drawes the judgement to comply with it But when God hath determined a certaine proportion of time it may be we shall find great congruitie therein even to naturall reason and farre more than in any other D. Field as Master Broad reports professeth that to one who knowes the story of the Creation it is evident by light of nature that one day in seven is to be consecrated to Gods service Part. 2. lib. 1. cap. 2. And Azorius the Jesuit in his morall Institutions acknowledgeth that It is most agreeable to reason that after six work dayes one day should be consecrated to divine worship The least division of dayes is into a weeke the next greater division is into a month the next into a yeare Now by light of nature it seemes farre more reasonable that one day in seven should be imployed in Gods service than one day in a moneth And if a seventh part of our time be to be consecrated unto God better a seventh day than a seventh part of every day because the worldly occupations of each of those dayes must needs cause miserable distraction Thus reason may discourse in probable manner when God hath gone before us to open a way unto us Certainly when God hath once determined the proportion of time it is so farre from being accounted morall as perpetuall and still to hold untill God himselfe shall alter it 3. As for the particularity of the day according to the forenamed proportion therein we should be farre more to seeke were wee left unto our selves time consisting in a continuall flux and succession one part afore and another after As namely supposing one day in seven is to be consecrated to Gods service yet wee shall still be to seeke which day of the seven is to be set apart for an holy use And no marvell for in it selfe it is nothing materiall For a proportion of service being required within a certaine compasse so it be done within that compasse every Master rests satisfied with his servants worke But as for difference in the proportion every one accounts that a matter of great moment God himselfe acknowledgeth this therefore to whom he gives but little at their hands he expects but little to whom hee gives much of them he expects much as our Saviour teacheth And Saint John exhorts Christians so to carry themselves in the Lords service that they may receive a full reward 2 Iohn 8 Yet both for our assurance that
the Sabbath to abstaine from such a course whereby a mans strength would become more and more weakned and impaired Not that these things were commanded on the Sabbath day but permitted as is often signified by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is lawfull and for good reason “ Matth. 12.10.12 Mar 3.4 Luk. 6.9 For the Sabbath being ordained to promote a mans bene esse his well being and that in the best things it supposeth libertie to provide for his esse in case of necessitie lest otherwise he shall be found uncapable of those things that concerne his bene esse his well being For our nature wanting necessarie refreshment doth thereby many times become the more unfit for holy excerises and to performe that dutie which God requires and hath deserved at our hands How were Ionathans eyes enlightned upon the tasting of a little honey 1 Sam. 14.29 But this Translator desires as it seemes from the generalitie of mans good to seale up an opinion in the minds of his Readers that the Sabbath was made not onely for the service of God and for the promoting of a man in the knowledge and feare of God but for the furthering of his carnall pleasures also But never was it knowne that our Saviour justified any libertie to such courses on the Sabbath Neither were any such things as it seemes in course in the dayes of the Prophet Amos who reprehends them for saying Am. 8.5 When will the Sabbath be gone that they might returne to their worldly courses Rather they could wish their sun might stand still on that day as sometimes it did in the dayes of Ioshua if libertie were given to sports pastimes and pleasures on that day and it wvre wondrous strange that libertie should bee debarred them from kindling a fire to set forward the structure of the Sanctuarie Exod. 35 3. Luke 33.25 â—ast made to this very end that the Lord might dwell among them And from so precious a worke as the embalming of the body of Christ the Lord of the Sabbath and that at the very end of the day if at that time they were not restrained from any sensuall course of recreation according to the common fashion of the world Undoubtedly howsoever it stands now with us Christians in the dayes of our Saviour they that rested on their Sabbath from embalming the body of Christ Luk. 23.56 and that according to the appointment which is as much as to say according to the Law of God surely they by the same Law of God were much more restrained from worldly pleasures these standing far more in opposition to the sanctification of the Lords Sabbath then the embalming of the body of the Sonne of God who was Lord of the Sabbath And therefore this text is most unseasonably and impertinently alleaged by the Translator to serve his turn being farre more fit to crosse his purposes then any way to promote them So from the consideration of the title I come to the preface If the antiquitie of this controversie concerning the Sabbath were any thing materiall this Praefacer were foundered at the first For what if the Sabbath bee a part of the Law of Moses Was not the law of sanctifying the name of God the law forbidding images the law commanding them to have no other Gods but him that brought them out of the land of Aegypt the law commanding to honour parents to abstaine from murther adultery theft were not all these the Law of Moses Is not the law of sanctifying the Sabbath one of the tenne Commandements delivered by God from Mount Sinai as well as the other nine and was it not kept in the Arke as well as the rest Circumcision was no law of Moses and therefore albeit it be said Ioh. 7.22 That Moses gave unto them Circumcision yet forthwith it is added not because it is of Moses but of the Fathers so that Moses rather confirmed it then was the first giver of it So that the Law of Moses in this place is to bee understood of the ceremoniall law not of the morall law contained in the Decalogue and among these tenne Commandements that of the Sabbath is one and commended unto them in that state as none so much Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it and not onely before Moses but before Abraham and Noah also wee read Gen. 2. â— â— that the seventh day God rested from all the workes that hee had made and that therefore God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Of any Minister or Pastor in the Church of England that maintaines us Christians to be obliged to the observation and sanctification of the Jewish Sabbath or of any Sabbath that is a shadow of things to come the body whereof is of Christ I never heard or read Yet for some hundred yeares in the Primitive Church not the Lords day onely but the seventh day also was religiously observed not by Ebion and Cerinthus onely but by pious Christians also as Baronius writeth and Gomarus confesseth and Rivet also that we are bound in conscience under the Gospell to allow for Gods service a better proportion of time than the Jewes did under the law rather than a worse And further it is well knowne that besides the weekely Sabbath there was variety of observation of times amongst the Jewes and divers of them called Sabbaths also as some think not one whereof was mentioned in the Decalogue or pronounced by the Lord from Mount Sinai as the fourth Commandement was for the sanctifying of the weekly Sabbath So that this Praefacer every way sheweth miserable loosenesse in his discourse And if Ebion and Cerinthus and Apollinaris how wretched heretickes soever did still inforce the sanctification of the Jewish Sabbath whose wretchednesse yet consisted not so much in inforcing this as in inforcing all the ceremonies of Moses the Jewish Sabbath long after Corinthus continuing to be observed by many pious Christians as Baronius observeth others and Saint Paul doth oppose all such doctrine and practise in these passages of his here mentioned did not this Author know that upon these very passages of Saint Paul the Anabaptists and Socinians as vile heretickes as Ebion and Cerinthus and Apollinaris for their blood have gone so farre as not onely to overthrow the observation of the Jewish Sabbath but the sanctifying of the Lords day also The opinion of the law ceremoniall standing still in force which indeed was the opinion of the heretickes mentioned is I confesse a dangerous point and such as not onely seemed as this Praefacer minceth it out of what degree of wisdome or providence I know not to confirme the Jewes in their incredulitie but indeed justly might confirme them nor onely occasion but justly cause also others to make question of our Saviours comming in the flesh not so the observation of the seventh day to sanctifie it for ought this Author hath hitherto manifested or throughout this preface of his doth manifest and
Jewes kept themselves as to the distinction of times by weekes so to call the dayes by their order the first the second and that the Pythagoreans did the like and called the first day of the weeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like as the Hellenists called it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the yeare 1627. There was set forth a book at Venice as the same Doctor Rivet writes intitled Thesaurus praeceptorum Isaaci Atiae Iudaei in the first part whereof and 157. praecept touching the Sabbath he writes to this effect that the holinesse of that sacred day is so well known that it were superfluous to use many words in the explication thereof seeing it is found to have impression in the very hearts of the Heathens themselves becaase there is none that knoweth not that when his highnesse to whom none can approch built this wonderfull frame he rested on the seventh day 2. And thus ere I am aware I am fallen upon the holinesse of the day acknowledged generally by the Heathens themselves as this Jewish writer conceaved Theophilus Antiochenus an antient Father in his second booke written to Autolycus acknowledgeth the celebrity of this day amongst all men though the reason thereof was not so well known to most to wit as drawn from Gods rest on that day after he had created the World Tertullian also acknowledged the Heathens to solemnize the seventh much after the same manner that the Jewes did confirmed by the learned observation of Iacobus Godefridus notwithstanding some exceptions made against it And that this was the practise of the Romans he proves farther out of Tibullus and Ovid namely that they did feriari rest on the Saturday as the Jewes did And Manasses Ben Israel in his 35. question upon Exodus writes thus Ne Agareni quidem Veneris diem religiosissimè colentes quem Algama vocant Sabbato nomen suum eripuerunt hauddubiè ita providente Deo ut omnium animis aeternitas ejus imprimeretur The very Agarenes most religiously observing the Friday which they call Algama have taken from the Sabbath its name doubtlesse God so providing that the eternity thereof should be imprinted in the minds of all men Belike as a testimony of Gods rest from his workes in the Creation therewithall to maintaine an acknowledgement of God the Creator More then this Salmasius acquainted Rivetus with some collections made by the forementioned Georgius Symellus out of certaine apocryphall bookes one whereof is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the litle generation the other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the life of Adam in which the author observes through many weeks that the seventh day was a day of rest and that he conceaved the author of that booke to have been a Jew translated by some Hellenist who makes mention of the Lords Day And Doctor Willet alleageth Philo calling the seventh day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a festivall of all Nations So little neede have wee to sticke upon that in Hesiod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the seventh is an holy day which some observe to have beene spoken not of the seventh day of the weeke but of the seventh day of the moneth rather wherein Apollo was borne which yet is alleaged by Clement and Eusebius as for the seventh day of the weeke what is wanting herein being so plentifully supplyed other wayes And whereas Gomarus being convicted of the evidence of this truth betakes himselfe to a new course as to say that this practise of Heathens was taken from the Jewes and not from the ancient Patriarchs Doctor Rivetus brings a manifest place out of Iosephus to refute that conceite of his As who professeth that this custome of the Gentiles had beene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 long agoe And how unlikely is it that either the Egyptians or the Nations bordering upon the Jewes should take this from the Jewes when we consider Solitum inter accolas odium as Tacitus observes the accustomed hatred between borderers Hist lib. 1. especially between the seed of the Woman and the seed of the Serpent * 1 Cor. 2.14 and how distastfull the things of God are unto naturall men even folishnesse unto them neither can they know them because they are spiritually discerned And Homer and Linus and Callimachus fetch the seventh day from the very Creation as whereon the making of all things was finished I come at length to the fourth Argument If the Patriarches had observed the Sabbath Moses would have mentioned the religious observation thereof by their ancestors to encourage them I answer 1. it is not likely they were ignorant of the practise of their ancestors The Chaldee paraphrase upon the Psal 92. supposeth Adam to have beene the author of the Psalm that is intitled for the Sabbath 2. If for Gods sake who delivered them out of Egypt they would not observe it neither would they observe it for their ancestors sake 3. Moses makes no mention of their ancestors practise in setting apart any time for the service of God shall we therefore deny that by the suggestion of light naturall some time is to be set apart for this The Fathers professe that no other positive precept was given to Adam then to abstein from the Fruit of a certaine Tree I answer Chrysostome professeth expressely that from the beginning God hath shewed that one day in the circle of the weeke is to bee set apart for spirituall operation Likewise the testimonies of Athanasius and Epiphanius are expresse for the acknowledgment of the institution of the Sabbath immediately from the Creation as before hath beene shewed Indeede both as touching the setting apart of some time in generall for Gods service and the proportion of one day in seven in speciall is more then positive Divines teach that before Christs comming the Gentiles might obtaine salvation by observing the morall Law and the Law of nature with some light of Divine faith and supernaturall assistance of God I answer 1. of what reputation those Divines hee speaks of deserve to bee with us let every Protestant judge 2. yet wee know that the Gentiles might have evidence enough of the holinesse of the seventh day and that God left not himselfe without witnesse in this even to Heathens is so notorious that we may justly wonder to observe how the monuments of the dignity of the seventh day were so strangely preserved among them 3. Yet where testimony sufficient was wanting not onely for the particularity of the day but for the proportion of time wee doe not hold these to be morall so absolutely and in such a degree as to say that failing in this alone in such a case should prejudice any mans salvation though we say with Chrysostome that God by the story of the Creation hath sufficiently manifested that one day in the weeke ought to be set apart for Gods Service and with Azorius the Jesuite that it is most agreeable to reason that after six worke dayes one day intire and whole should bee consecrated
to shew the place Then in the often disputations of our Saviour with the Pharisees about their superstitious observation of the Sabbath Day he demands where is the least suspicion of the abrogation of it or any mention that the Lords Day was instituted in the place thereof And indeed the time hereof was not yet come onely the death of Christ setting an end to ceremonies Then he demands whether the Apostles did not keepe the Jewish Sabbath now I doe not find they did although they tooke occasions of their meetings on that day to dispute with them and to instruct them in the Faith of Christ Then he demands whether the Primitive Church did not designe as well the Sabbath as the Lords Day to sacred meetings I find in Baronius Baron tom 1. pag. 517. that Orthodoxi Orientales did and the occasion also to wit in detestation of the Marcionites yet without any such respect it had been nothing strange considering that even now adayes Saturday is counted halfe holy day and that the Jewes had a preparation for the Sabbath in such sort that on their behalfe Augustus made a rescript that no Jewes should be compelled to make good their suretiships as much to say Baron tom 1. pag. 148. they should not be arrested either on the Sabbath dayes or after three a clocke of the day going before Hereupon which is yet a very weake ground in my judgement he saith that Papists inferre that the Lords Day is not of Divine institution he doth not make any such inference himselfe Yet notwithstanding he confesseth that even in the Church of Rome Anchoranus Panormitane Angelus and Sylvester all which this Prefacer conceals very judiciously for his owne advantage have stoutly set themselves against these luke-warme Advocates in affirmation of the Divine authority of the Lords Day And I find that Azorius in his institutions makes mention of them to the same purpose and addes that Sylvester professeth hanc esse opinionem communem that this is the common opinion And after this Doctor Prideaux in that Section disputes for the Divine institution thereof rather than against it After this he takes notice of Pauls fact Acts 20.7 and disputes therehence for a custome to celebrate on the first day of the weeke their publike meetings and confesseth that the Fathers and all Interpreters almost doe so conceive it though withall he professeth hee sees not how from a casuall fact so he calleth it upon what ground I know not a solemne institution may be justly grounded yet that which went before in some opposition whereunto this is delivered pleaded not for a solemne institution but for a custome onely although upon due consideration it may be found that such a custome if that be granted could not otherwise proceed originally than from a solemne institution It is enough if they ordained that on that day the Churches should be assembled for publique worship which Austin expressely professeth as formerly I have shewed neither doth it appeare in reason how it could be otherwise such assemblies being universall and so continuing to this day Is it credible such universall agreement should come to passe casually if it did yet their continuance of it without dislike doth manifest their joynt Apostolicall approbation who we know were guided by the Spirit of God and even in their time was the first day of the weeke called the Lords Day So that in all this I find no incoherence much lesse notable Indeed in the first of the Corinth chap. 16.2 he doth not order that the first day should be set apart for Gods service but rather supposeth it and that not onely at Corinth but in the Churches of Galatia how improbable is it that this uniformity should be among them unlesse it proceeded from some authority superiour to the Churches themselves then comming to consider the denomination of the Lords Day and concluding it to be the first day of the weeke and therewithall concluding that sixth Section the seventh Section he begins thus what then Shall we affirme that the Lords Day is founded in Divine authority and answers the question thus For my part without prejudice to any mans opinion I assent unto it however the arguments like me not whereby the opinion is supported and so he proceeds in prosecuting of that which was affirmed by him in the last place concerning his private dislike of some particular courses taken to justifie it He opposeth I grant expresse institution but if by just consequence it may be deduced it serveth our turne both in the generall and in particular at this time and in this place to discover the immodest and unreasonable carriage of this Prefacer who would obtrude the contrary opinion upon Doctor Pride aux as it were in despite of him And indeed it is thought that hee owed him a spight and to pay that hee owed him hee came to this translation But herein the Doctors honour is easily preserved in the despight of this Prefacer yet see a greater degree of impudency in this Prefacer For he puts upon the Doctor as if hee had shewed the alteration of the day to be onely an humane and Ecclesiasticall institution by the generall consent of all sorts of Papists Jesuits Azorius institut Part. 2. l. 1. c. 2. Canonists and Schoole-men of some great Lutherans by name whereas it is plaine that he mentioneth more Papists maintaining the Lords Day to be of Divine institution then opposing it And amongst them that maintaine it one to wit Sylvester professeth it to be opinionem commâ—nâ—m not one avouched as affirming the contrary And as for the great Lutherans this Author speaketh of loving to speake with a full mouth they are but one and that Brentius who is said to affirme it to be a civill ordinance and not a commandement of the Gospel a very strange phrase in my opinion to call it a civill ordinance the ordinance being in force many hundred yeeres before the Church of God had any civill government of their own and being in the Apostles dayes how could it be lesse than Apostolicall undoubtedly not so much civill as Ecclesiasticall Wee grant willingly we have no expresse precept for it yet Austin is bold to say as wee have heard that Apostoli sanxerunt yet Gomarus allegeth no passage out of Brentius to this purpose But Melancthon ever as I take it accounted of better authoritie than Brentius professeth as Walaeus reports him that consentaneum est Apostolos hanc ipsam ob causam mutasse diem in plaine termes ascribing the change of the day to the Apostles As for the Remonstrants what authority have they deserved to have with us who are so neere a kinne to the Socinians who uttterly professe against all observation of the Lords Day But the foure professors of Leiden have passed over this of theirs without note or opposition And was not Walaeus one of the foure yet what his opinion is himselfe hath manifested to the
opportunities are delivered in reference to the periods and changing of Kingdomes and Monarchies as appeares by the argument of the Prophecy Reply And no more doth D. Rivetus deliver in excepting against his annotations for as he acknowledgeth M. Perkins scriptorem modestissimum a most modest writer so he carryeth himselfe most modestly towards him But I hope without any breach of modesty I may professe that I find no accuratenesse in each of his allegations save one namely that wherein Christ professeth himself Lord of the Sabbath and it is enough for the present that God reserves to himself power of ordering times for his service yet it cannot be denied but God hath left power to his Church upon good occasion to set some time apart for exercise of piety But whereas it is apparant that God himselfe tooke upon him the ordering of the time for the Sabbath and accordingly Christ calls himselfe The Lord of the Sabbath as he constituted it so none but he can abrogate it and ordaine another in the place of it Now whereas D. Rivetus saith that hee hath left this power unto his Church it stands him upon to prove it We find our Saviour supposeth us Christians to have a Sabbath after his resurrection Matth. 24.20 as well as the Jewes had before wee find that in the Apostles dayes the first day of the weeke was set apart for this which could not be but by the joynt consent of the Apostles we find that the day of the weeke not the day of the yeere wherein Christ rose by Saint Iohn himselfe called the Lords Day an evident argument that in his time it was so generally received We find that never any worke of God did give better cause to professe that The day thereof was the day that the Lord had made let us be glad and rejoyce therein then the day wherein Christ rose from the dead and thereby was declared to be the Sonne of God even that stone which the builders refused to be made the head of the corner And how strange is it that the Church for 1500. yeeres space should no where offer to alter it if in no other respect yet in this to manifest that the Church is indued with such liberty and power and to prevent the superstitious observation of the day as a thing necessary if it be not necessary Lastly if this liberty be still in the Church in case they should exercise this liberty what inconvenience would follow upon the exercising of a lawfull liberty But infinit inconvenience would follow hereupon for seeing this liberty is equally communicated to each particular Church it will follow that it is lawfull for our English Church to institute the Munday the French Church the Tuesday the Hollanders the Wednesday the Germans Thursday the Danes Friday the Swedes the Saturday and the Polonians the Sunday what an intolerable scandall were this amongst Christians Thus our liberty opens way to revive the Jewes Sabbath or to concurre with the Turks who make Friday their holy day nay what scandall also to all the Heathens throughout the world For suppose that as the Jewes keepe the Saturday and the Turks their Fryday so other heathenish nations according to their severall religions should divide the other daies of the weeke to be hallowed between them each religion keeping to their own day most exactly When they should find no agreement amongst Christians what an intolerable scandall were this unto them to harden them against the profession of the Gospel when they see so little agreement among the professors of it And what should move us to affect liberty in this which opens a way to such dissention and confusion and not rather rejoyce in this that to prevent such miserable inconveniences God himselfe hath marked out unto us the first day of the weeke to be the Lords Day in place of the Jewish Sabbath which was the Lords holy day unto them by the most wonderful and comfortable work that ever was wrought even the resurrection of our Lord and Saviour from the dead thereby manifesting him to be the Sonne of God and fulfilling that prophecie of old concerning the stone which the builders refused and making him the head of the corner on that day all power being given unto him both in heaven and in earth Matth. 28. thus drawing us in the Prophets language to professe and say first This is the Lords doing and it is marvellous in our eyes and secondly to conclude there-hence in the words immediately following This is the day which the Lord hath made let us be glad and rejoyce in it this undoubtedly is our Christian festivall this day of the weeke and not this day of the yeere which is remarkable being called by Saint Iohn The Lords Day the day wherein Christ appeared unto him and gave unto him the booke of Revelation concerning the secrets of his providence to be fulfilled upon the world for the time to come even till his second comming to destroy the world with fire and to blesse us with new heavens and a new earth wherein dwelleth righteousnesse the metropolis of which new world shall be new Jerusalem And albeit Doctor Rivetus according to his pious ingenuity which crownes his learning and cathedrall sufficiencies professeth that what hitherto hath beene spoken by him of the choyce and possible change of that day he hath not to any such end ventilated as to favour their profanesse who on holy dayes and chiefely on that day which by so universall a consent even from the beginning of Christianity hath beene consecrated to such use neglecting Gods Service not onely refuse to omit one day in prosecuting workes tending to the use of life temporall but also by unnecessary actions as by pleasant sports stage playes by intemperance also and riot profane the day not without reason dedicated to the Lord. Yet what just occasion hereby may bee in all places and like enough is taken in most places by this doctrine of his who seeth not For albeit publike authority in some places hath by lawes countenanced the solemnization of the Lords Day for which wee of this land have cause to blesse God so as I thinke no Nation more in consideration of many Lawes one after another and by degrees made to restraine abuses on that day as tending to the manifest profanation thereof and by none more then by that act of Parliament in the first of King Charles wherein all men are forbidden to come out of their Parishes upon that day about any sports and pastime evidently manifesting hereby as formerly hath beene proved that all sports and pastimes are prophanations of our Christian Sabbath observed on that day and that in the judgement of the whole Parliament consisting of the Kings Majesty the head thereof with his Lords spirituall all the Bishops of the Kingdome and temporal together with the House of Commons yet if once it shall be receaved according to D. Rivets doctrine of the Sabbath that it
them And it is well knowne to some what the former Archbishop of Canterbury professed to the face of M. Broade when he came to move for the printing of a second book concerning the Sabbath What Bishop can our opposites name of this Church whose praise is among the writers of these times that hath manifested his opinion in opposition to these As for the judgements of all kinde of writers which he boasts of I thinke never came a Divine to take pen in hand to vaunt so much and performe so little As for the unsafe condition of our Tenets which he suggests excepting those monstrous and wild Tenets mentioned by M. Rogers for which I know no better evidence than his word and that in very odde manner delivered I know nothing unsafe nothing dangerous in any Tenet of ours who now seeme to walke as upon the pinacles of the Temple and indeed in this respect they are like to prove very dangerous to us yet I would it were not more dangerous to the Church of God to be bereaved of so many faithfull Pastors For certainly it shall be honourable unto them they cannot suffer in a more honorable cause than this in standing for the sanctifying of the Lords Day in memory of his resurrection who that day being formerly a stone refused of the builders was made the head of the corner For what danger is it to maintaine that from the Creation the Lord blessed the seventh day and sanctified it and what a shamefull course is it so to expound it as in reference to a time 2000. and 4. or 500. yeeres after and that in spight of the ancient Fathers And manifest reason as appeares by division of time into weekes even from the creation and so continuing to the time of the Law delivered on the mount Sinai as appeares by the story of falling of Manna and the Jewes gathering of it on sixe dayes none falling now being gathered on the seventh as the day on the week whereon God rested after he had made the world in six What danger in maintaining that God required from the beginning and afterwards specified so much in the Law that one day in seven is to be consecrated unto Gods service and hence to inferre that if God required so much of the Jews under the Law it were most unreasonable and unconscionable we should not afford unto him and his service as good a proportion of time under the Gospel Thirdly what danger is there in affirming that the Lords Day is of Divine institution Is it not Scripture that calls it the Lords Day And what day was called the Lords Day before but the day of the Jewes Sabbath And hath not our Saviour manifestly given us to understand that even Christians were to have their Sabbath as the Jewes had theirs as Bishop Andrewes accommodates the place Matth. 24.20 And was the resurrection of Christ any thing inferiour to the creation to give a day unto us Christians like as Gods rest from creation commended that day to the Jewes Especially considering that a new creation requires a new Sabbath as Athanasius delivered it of old And D. Andrewes of late yeeres treading in the steps of that ancient Father or rather of all the ancient Fathers And what danger in maintaining that the Lords Day is entire and whole to be consecrated to Divine service did Austin speake dangerously when he professeth that thereon we must tantum Deo vacare tantuÌ„ cultibus divinis vacare would this Prefacer be content to be found dancing about a May pole or in a Morrice-dance that day that Christ should come in flaming fire to render vengeance to all them that know not God nor obey the Gospel of Christ Jesus Nay would hee not feare to rue the danger of his doctrine when it will be too late to correct it and all the profanenesse that hee hath promoted by this preface of his should rise up in judgement against him yet now he thinkes he could not goe about a better worke than by this preface translation to harden them in their profane and impure courses all his care at this time is to prevent superstition a wonder it is to see how zealous men of his spirit are to avoyd and shun superstition Belike all these must be censured for Zelotes that complaine that the Lords day is with us licentiously yea sacrilegiously profaned yet these are the times whereof S. Paul prophecied that men should be lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God yet Doctor Prideaux could take liberty to professe of the Jewes that by their Bacchanalian rites they gave the world just occasion to suspect that they did consecrate their Sabbaths unto devils rather than unto Gods service yet now adayes they that oppose revels on the Sabbath day are censured and condemned of Judaisme Neither is D. Prideaux censured by way of scorne for a zelote in this but unlesse wee concurre with this Prefacer in thinking that the forbidding of dancing in the French Churches hath hindred the growth of the reformed Religion there and that upon the bare credit of Heylins Geography wee must in scorne be termed zelotes Belike Bishop Babington by this bold Prefacer would be censured for a zelote considering that on Exodus 16. pag. 122. hve writes in this manner May not a good soule thus reason with himselfe This people of his might not gather Manna and may I safely goe to markets dancings drinkings to wakes and wantons to Beare-baitings and Bul-baitings and such like wicked profanations on the Lords Day Is this to keepe the holy day Can I answer this to my God that gives mee six dayes for my selfe and takes but one to himselfe of which I rob him also And Bishop Austin too deserves to be censured a zelote for that which hee writes in his 3. tract upon Iohn Observe the Sabbath Day it is rather commanded unto us because it is commanded to be observed in a spirituall manner For the Jewes observe the Sabbath day servilely unto luxury unto drunkennesse How much better were it for their Women to spinne Wooll then to dance on that day in their new Moones and in his 44. tract The Jewes rest unto toyes and whereas God commanded the Sabbath to be observed they spend the Sabbath in such things which the Lord forbids Our rest is from evill works their rest is from good works For it is better to goe to plow then to dance but albeit hee be censured as a Zelote yet surely there is no colour why hee should be thought to Judaize in this And let Bishop Nazianzâ—ne passe under the same censure with them who as Dialericus upon the 17. Dominicall after Trinitie Sunday alleageth him professeth that the sanctification of the Sabbath consists not in the hilarity of our bodies nor in the variety of glorious garments nor in eatings the fruite wherof we know to be wantonnesse nor in strewing of Flowers in the wayes which we know to be the manner of the