such a Feast if you make a Feoffement to another of this Mannor before the same Feast you have forfeited the obligation although that you purchase the Land againe before the said Feast because that you were once disabled to make the feoffement If a man Lease a Mannor for yeares and the Lessee covenanteth to uphold the Houses and to leave the same Mannor in as good an estate as he found it and during the terme the Lessee maketh wast in Houses and cutting of Tymber c. the Lessor may have a Writ of Covenant before the end of the Tearme for cutting the Timber for it was impossible that the Covenant should be performed after for the Timber but otherwise of the Houses Fitz Na. br fo 145 K. It was also resolved that if a man seised of Lands in Fee covenant to infeoffee I. S. upon request and after he maketh a feoffement of the same to a Stranger in this Case I. S. may have an Action of Covenant without request Laughters Case 37. Eliz. fo 21. Banco regis WHere a condition of an obligation consisteth upon two parts in the disjunctive and both possible at the time of the obligation made and after one of them becomes impossible by the Act of God the obligor is not bound to performe the other part for the condition is made for the benefite of the obligor and shall be taken most beneficiall for him and he had an Election eyther to performe the one or the other for the saving of his Obligation but now Impotentia excusat legem Hallings Case 38. Eliz. Com. banco fo 22. ONe Covenanteth to make an estate in Fee at the costs of the Covenantee the Covenantor is to doe the first Act Idest to Notifie what assurance he will make that the Covenantee may know what summe to tender Mathewsons Case 39 Eliz. fo 23. Com. banco SEverall persons make severall Covenants in one Indenture or Writing the Seale of one of them is broken away that shall not avoyd the Covenant of the rest but onely the Covenant of him whose Seale is so debrused or defaced Vide Piggots Case in the 11th Report because severall Covenants otherwise if joynt Lambes case 41. Eliz. fo 23. com banco A. Is bound unto B. to give unto B. such a release c. before the 22. day of October next as by the Judge of the Prerogative Court is thought fit In this Case A. must procure the Judge to doe it or devise it for the Judge is a stranger to the condition and the condition is for the benefite of the Obligor and he hath taken upon him to performe the same at his perill but it is otherwise if the Obligee or his Councell should devise it Broughtons case 43. Eliz. fo 24. Banco regis IN an Action of Debt by Broughton Plaintiffe against Pretty upon an Obligation with condition where the Plaintiffe was bound in an obligation of 200. l. for the Defendant for the payment of 100. l. to C. if therefore the Defendant should save and keepe harmlesse the said Broughton from all Suites quarrells and Demands touching the said Obligation c. that then the Obligation to be void c. at the day of payment of the 100. l. the Plaintiffe commeth to the place where the 100 l. ought to be paid and perceiving there not any person present to pay the 100. l. for the Defendant Broughton to save the penalty of the Obligation paid the money to C. and brought his Action upon the Counter-bond and it was adjudged that the Plaintiffe should recover for the payment of the 100. l. is damage and harme And it is not necessary whither the Plaintiff was arrested or sued c. Terror of suite so as he dare not goe about his businesse is Damnification although he be not arrested Deane Chapter de Winsors Case 44. Eliz. fo 24. Banco regis A Man Leased a House by Indenture for yeares the Lessee Covenants and grants for him and his Executors with the Lessor to repaire the house at all times necessary the Lessee Assignes over and the Assignee suffereth the house to decay the Lessor brought an Action of Covenant against the Assignee and it was adjudged per Popham and all the Court that the Action lyeth although the Lessee had not Covenanted for his Assignes because in respect thereof the rent is the lesse which is for the benefite of the Assignee Qui sentit commodum sentire debet onus If a man grant one Estovers to repaire his house this is appurtenant to the house Fitz H. nat br 181.28 H. 8.28 Sir Thomas Palmers Case 43. El. fo 24. banco regis SIr Thomas Palmer seised in Fee of a great Wood. Did bargaine and sell to one Cornford and his Assignes 600. cords of Wood to be taken by Assignement of Sir Thomas Cornford assignes his interest to one Basset and afterward Sir Thomas sells to one Maynard such quantity of Wood as will make 4000. cords at Election of the Vendee and afterwards Sir Thomas assignes to Basset 600. cords of Wood to be taken by him who doth fall the same and Maynard did take them away and converted them c. an Action upon the case was brought by Basset and iudgement was given for him for Corneford had an interest which he might assigne over and not a thing in action or a possibility for it was resolved if Sir Thomas did not assigne them to Cornford upon request Cornford might take them without assignment for the Grantor cannot by his owne act or default eyther subvert or derogate from his owne grant Therefore it ensueth that Cornford had an interest that he might assigne over If A. have a house and Land and reasonable estovers in the Woods of another by view and livery of the Bayliffe c. if A. take estovers without view or livery c. he is a trespassor although he take lesse then he ought to have by livery But if A. demand his estovers and the Owner or his Bayliffe will not deliver to him he may have an Assize 2. If the Assignement were voyd yet the Defendant cannot take Trees cut by another but out of the residue of the Wood. The Earle of Rutlands case 2. Ja. fo 25. banco regis EDward Earle of Rutland seised of the Mannor of Eykering by Indenure dated 10. March Anno. 21. El. for augmentation of the joynture of Issabell his Countesse did Covenant with Sir Gilb. Gerrard and Thomas Houlcroft his Brother that before the end of Trinity terme then next following he would assure by fine or other conveyance the said Mannor to the said Sir Gilb. Gerrard and Thomas in Fee which syne or other conveyance should be to the use of the said Earle and Issabell his Wife and the Heires of the said Earle which Indenture was acknowledged and inrolled in the Chancery the 28. of the same Moneth of March by another Indenture betweene the said Earle on the one part and the Lord Burleigh on the other
tender more then he is bound to pay it is good Omne majus continet in se minus That the tendring of 250. li. in bags without shewing or numbering the same is good tender if the truth be that there was so much vide Winters case if there be any counterfeit money in the same yet if the partie then accept the same he cannot compell the partie to change it or if it be a rent or for non-payment a reentree yet the once acceptance is good and the lessor may not reenter Foliambes Case 43. Eliz. fo 115. IN a writ of Estrepement the Sheriffe may resist them that will make wast or cut downe Trees and if he cannot otherwise he may Imprison them and may make warrants to others and he may take Posse comitatus for his aide A writ of Estrepement lyeth in an Action of wast as well before judgement as after Olands Case 44. Eliz. Banco regis fo 116. A Feme Copy holder Durante viduitate sowes the Land and taketh Husband the Lord shall have the Corne for although her estate was incertaine yet it was determined by her owne act so if Lessee at will sowe the Land and determine the will but if Baron and Feme are Lessees during the coverture and the Baron sowe the Land and they are after Divorsed Causa praecontractus the Baron shall have the Emblements because this is the Act of the Court. Pynnells Case 44. Eliz. fo 117. com banco PYnnell brought an Action of Debt upon an Obligation against Cole of 16. l. for payment of 8. l. 10. s. on the 11. of Nov. 1600. The Defendant pleaded that at the instance of the Plaintiffe before the sayd day he paid him 5. l 10. s. and it was resolved by all the Court that the payment of a lesser summe in satisfaction of a greater summe cannot be satisfaction for all so that by no possibility a meaner summe may satisfie the Plaintiffe of a greater but the Gift of an Horse Cowe Robe c. in satisfaction is good But in this case it was resolved That the payment of a parcell and acceptance thereof before the day in satisfaction of all is a good satisfaction in respect of the circumstance of time for paradventure parcell of that before the day may be more beneficiall unto him then the whose summe of money at the day and the value of satisfaction is not materiall for if I be bound to pay you 10. l. at Westminster and you request me to pay 5. l. at Yorke and you will accept the same in full satisfaction of the 10. l. this is a good satisfaction in respect of the place but in this case the Plaintiffe had judgement for the insufficient pleading for he did not pleade that he had paid 5. l. 10 s in full satisfaction as by Law he ought but pleaded the payment of part generally and the Plaintiffe accepted the same in full satisfaction and alwayes the manner of the tender and of the payment shall be directed by him that maketh the tender and payment and not by him that accepteth it Edriches Case 1. Jacobi com banco fo 118. A Rent charge is granted to B. for the life of C. the Grantor leaseth for life to D. the remainder in Fee to E. C. and D. dyes B. distraines E. for all arreares this is good by the Statute of 32. H. 8. cap. 37. Whelpdales Case 2. Jacobi com banco fo 119. IN Debt brought against one joint Obligor the Defendant pleads Non est factum adjudged for the Plaintiffe 1. Resolved he may pleade in abatement of the Writ but not Non est factum for every one is obliged in the intirety therefore if Debt be brought against both and one is outlawed the other who appeares shall be charged with all 2. If a Deede be avoidable by plea he shall not pleade Non est factum 3. If a Deede be made voyd by Statute he shall not pleade Non est factum but shall avoide it by plea but if a deede by matter Ex post facto become not his deede he may pleade Non est factum as if one deliver a deede to deliver over to I. S. who refuseth c. Longs Case 2. Jacobi banco regis fo 120. EXception to the Inditement of Murder the Inditement was taken Infra libertatem villae de C. and C. where the Torte is done is not said to be within the Liberty Response that to Inditements certainty to a certaine intent in generall sufficeth and not to every particular intent for that is Nimia subtilitas and it shall be intended that the Ville of C. is within the liberty of C. the Indictment is Quod dedit vulnus super anteriorem partem corporis subter mamillam where it should be Mammillam Resolved that false Latine shall not quash an Indictment if the word be sensible and these two words are good Latine also this is superfluous for Super anteriorem partem corporis is sufficient and shall be intended the Trunke betwixt the Neck and Thighs 3. Vulnus where it should be Plaga over-ruled because Synonima 4. Le depthe is not shewed it was said that it did penetrate all his body whereby it appeareth that it was mortall 5. It is said that the wound did penetrate his body and not the Bullet this is significant enough 6. Percussit wanteth and for this cause the Indictment was quashed for in all cases of death this ought to be except in case of poysoning and for this last error the Outlary was reversed and H. D. was discharged Saffins Case 3. Jacob. fo 123. com banco A Man maketh a Lease for yeares to commence after the end or determination of a former Lease In esse The first Lease endeth the second Lessee doth not enter but he in reversion entereth and maketh a Feoffement and levyeth a fine with Proclamations and five yeares passe without entry or claime of the second Lessee If this fine be a Bar was the Question and it was resolved to be a Bar for the Statute of 4. H. 7. c. 24. speakes of interest and a Lease for yeares is an interest within the Statute so oâ— tenant by Elegit c. De Libellis famosis 3. Jac. fo 125. A Libell may be made as well against a private man as against a Magistrate Non refert whither the Libell be true or whither the party be of good fame or ill fame for it inciteth all the same Family Kindred or Society to revenge and so tendeth by consequence to the effusion of blood It was resolved in the Starre-Chamber 44. Eliz. Hallywoods Case that if any finde a Libell and would preserve himselfe out of danger if it be against a private man the finder may eyther burne it or presently deliver it to a Magistrate but if it concerne a Magistrate or publick person then he ought to give it to a Magistrate A Libell may be as well by words Verbis aut cantilenis as Writings and by Pictures
construed shall or might be leavyed and so 't was holden of a Lease or limittation of a use otherwise he which is to leavy the Summe by deferring to doe it may exclude the reversioner for ever see the Booke at large Resolved when the heire or reversioner c. enters and expulses him to whom the Land is limitted he hath election to recover the Mesne profits in an action or reentry and retainer till he leavyes the inteir Summe and the other shall not have advantage of his owne wrong and if a stranger had entered and occupied the Devisee ought to have taken notice at his perill for Vigilantibus non c. and none is bound to give notice but here the Heire himselfe concealed the will and the Devisee had no remedy for the Mesne profits after the death of the heire Resolved that a Gardian shall not ouste Tenant for life nor yeares of the Tenement Resolved that admitting the Gardian shall ouste Tenant for yeares yet he shall not hold over because his terme is certaine in the commencement continuance and end otherwise of Tenant by Elegit Statute c. they shall hold over because the terme is uncertaine Southcots Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 83. IF A. doe deliver goods to B. for to keepe the goods be purloyned away yet B. shall be charged in a Writ of detinue For to keepe and to keepe safely is all one but if B. doe take them to keepe as his owne goods he shall not be charged with them And if A. doe pledge or Guage goods unto B. in this Case B. shall not answer for them if they be purloyned for he had some property in them and not a custody onely but a ferryman a common Inkeeper or a Carrier which taketh hyre they ought to keepe the goods safely and they shall not be discharged if they be stollen or purloyned But a Factor or a Servant although he have wages doing his indeavour shall not be charged Luttreles Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 86. IF a man have estovers eyther by grant or prescription to his house although he alter the Rooms and Chambers in his House it seemeth that the alteration of the qualities so as it be not of the house it selfe and without making new Chimnyes by which no prejudice accrewes to the owners of the Wood is not any destruction of the prescription and though he make new Chimnyes or make a new addition to his old house he shall not loose his prescription thereby but he may imploy or spend any of his new estovers in the Chimnyes or in that part newly added It was also resolved that if a House or Milne doe fal or be taken downe by the act of the owner or by wrong of another yet for that the perdurable part which includes all doth remaine which is the Land whereupon the Fabrick is built he may reedifie the same againe without any Losse of his apendant or apurtenant but it ought to be upon the same place which was the Foundation of the old House for as it did support and in judgement of Law included the ancient house when it was standing so it supports and includes the new house so as it is in a manner a continuance of the ancient house Diverse Tenants doe hold of another as of his Mannor by fealty and suite to the Lords Milne the Lord doth alien his Milne with the suite of his Tenants and after the vendor dyeth and his Sonne entereth and buildeth a new Milne upon the other part of his demeane he shall have the suite to his owne Milne which the Vendee had before for the suite belongeth to him that hath the Mannor for no man may have suite to his milne by reason of a Tenure If it be not of Corne growing upon the Lands within the Seigniory or Mannor and the Lord may erect a new Milne within any part of the Mannor and the Tenure is due to the same and not to any particular Milne Druries Case 43. Eliz. Error in Banco Regis fo 84. A Countesse being a Widdow retaineth three Chaplaines he who is last reteined is not capable of a dispensation for the Statue of 21. H. 8. c. 13. is executed by reteining of two and the reteining of the third shall not devest the capacity which was in the first two but if the reteiner had beene at one time he who is first promoted shall be first preferred because in Aequali jure c. 2. Resolved if the two first die the third is not capable of dispensation without a new reteiner because he was reteined at the common Law and not according to the Statute Quod ab initio non valet c. As if the Sonne and Heire of a Baron reteineth a Chaplaine and giveth him Letters under his Seale and after the Father dyeth And it was said that the said Act shall be taken strictly as if a Baron be made Gardian of the 5. parts he shall reteine no more Chaplains then before and if a Baron retaine two Chaplaines who are promoted he cannot discharge them and reteine others during their lives Slades Case 44. Eliz. fo 92. IT was resolved that every contract executory imports in it selfe an assumpsit For when one doth agree to pay money or to deliver any thing by that he doth assume and promise to pay or to deliver the things and therefore when he selleth any goods to another and agreeth to deliver them at a day to come and the other in consideration thereof agreeth to pay so much money at such a day in this case both parties may have an Action of Debt or Action upon the case upon the assumpsit for the mutuall executory agreement of both parties import in themselves as well a reciprocall Action upon the Case as an action of debt and a recovery or barr in an action of debt is a good Barre in an action upon the Case brought upon the same contract and so likewise in an Action upon the Case a recovery or Barre in the same is a good plea in an Action of Debt upon the same contract The Defendant in an Action of the Case upon the assumpsit may not wage his Law as he may doe in an action of Debt If a Summe of money be promised in Marriage to be paid at severall dayes an Action upon the assumpsit lyeth for non payment of the first although no Action of Debt lyeth untill all the dayes be past Multitudo errantium non parit errori patrocinium and if the Debtor of the King sueth by Quo minus in the Exchequor the defendant shall not have his Law for the benefit of the King Adams and Lamberts Case 44. and 45. Eliz. in banco Regis in Ejectione firmae fo 104. UPon consideration of the Statute of 1 E. 6. cap. 14. it was resolved 1. That if one demise to any of his Kindred to superstitious uses although he limit them to pay certaine Summes of
causa frigiditatis and that his wife for three yeares after the marriage Remansit virgo intacta propter perpetuam impotentiam generationes in viro quod vir fuit inaptus ad generandum and in this speciall verdict all the examinations of the Witnesses upon which the Judge in the spirituall Court was moved to give his sentence by which the perpetuall disabilitie of Bury ad generandum was manifest were reade and by which it was pretended that the issue which he had by a second wife was illegitimate and this was the doubt of the Jury And it was adjudged that the issue of the second wife was lawfull for it is cleare that by the Divorce causa frigiditatis the marriage is dissolved a vinculo matrimonij and by consequence either of them might marry after then admitting that the second marriage was avoydable yet it remained a marriage untill it was dissolved and by consequence the issue that is borne during the coverture if no divorce be in the life of the parties is lawfull Et homo potest esse habilis inhabilis diversis temporibus and Judgement affirmed in Error Flowers case 41. El. Banco Regis fol. 99. AN indictment of perjury upon 5o. El. for giving false evidence to the great Inquest is not within the Statute for it must be in matter depending in suite by Bill Writt action or information vide le Statut. Plus peccat author quam actor Rookes case 40. Eliz. fol. 99. THat the Commissioners in the Cōmission of Sewers ought to tax all which are in damage or in danger of damage for non-repaire of the Bancks and not onely him which hath the Land next adjoyning to the River The Commission is grounded upon the Statute 6. H. 6. cap. 5. for if the Law were otherwise great inconvenience might follow for it might be that the rage and force of the water might be such that the value of the Land adjoyning would not serve to amend the Bancks and therefore the Statute would have all in perill and which take commoditie by the making of the Bancks to be contributory for qui sentit commodum sentire debet onus ipsae leges cupiunt ut jure regantur And notwithstanding by the words of the Commission authoritie is given to the Commissioners to doe according to their discretions yet their proceedings ought to be limitted and bounded with the rule of the Law and reason For discretion is a knowledge or understanding to discerne betweene right and falshood truth and wrong shadowes and substances equity and colourable glosses and pretences and not to doe according to their wills and private affection For a learned Man saith Talis discretio discretionem confundit Penruddocks case 40. Eliz. fol. 100. IN a quod permittat betweene Clarke assignee of Thomas Chichley plaintiffe and Ed Penruddock and Mary his wife defendants assignee of one John Cock for that Cock 2o. 8 bris 1o. Mariae erected upon his freehold a house in St. Johns streete so neere the Curtelage of an house of Thomas Chichley that Domus illa super pendet Anglice doth overhang magnam partem videlicet 3. pedes curtilagij the plaintiffe sic quod aquae pluviales de eadem domo decedentes solum ejusdem curtilagij conterunt magnopere ac indies magis magisque consumunt Devastant ac ea ratione curtilag ' praed quolibet pluviale tempore humectat ' inundat existit quod praedictus Henricus Clarke inhabitans in eodem Messuagio nullum proficuum seu easiamentum de eodem curtilagio percipere possit ad necumentum liberi tenuenti praed ' c. And it was resolved that the distilling of the waters in the time of the Feoffee or assignee is a new wrong and this Writ lyeth after request of amendment but not before but it lyeth against him that did the wrong without request and the action good c. Windsors case 41. Eliz. fol. 102. IN a quare impedit by Windsor against the Archbishop of Canterbury for the Church of Buscott in the County of Bark It was adjudged that if two have title to present by turne and the one present who is admitted instituted and inducted and afterwards is deprived for Crime Heresie c. yet that Patron should not present againe but that shall serve for his turne So likewise if he present a meere Laicus which was admitted instituted and induced although it be declared by sentence that he was incapable and therefore voyd ab initio yet because the Church was full untill the sentence declaratory be pronounced yet that shall serve for his Turne But when the admission and institution are meerely void then that shall not serve for one Turne as if a presentee be once admitted instituted and inducted but hath not subscribed to the Articles c. according to the Statute of 13. El. by which in this case the admission institution and induction are voyde 23. El. Dier pl ' ult ' acc Hungatts case 43. El. Com. Banco fol. 103. HVngatt brought an action of debt upon an Obligation against Mese and Smith the condition was to performe an award between the plaintiffe on the one partie and the defendants on the other Ita quod arbitrium praed fiat deliberetur utrique partium praed before such a day the arbitrament before the day was delivered to the plaintiffe and to Mese but not to Smith Judgement was given against the plaintiffe It was resolved that if two be of one partie and two of another and the words are Ita quod deliber utrique partium That the delivery of the arbitrament to one of the one part and another of the other partie is not sufficient For the partie is to be intended of the whole partie for one is as well within the penaltie and danger of the Obligation as the other and uterque is taken sometime Discretive sometimes Collective Secundum subjectam materiam but here it is taken Collective Bakers case 42. Eliz. fol. 104. IF a plaintiffe in evidence shew any matter in writing or record or any sentence in the Ecclesiasticall Court whereupon Law doth arise and the defendant offer to demurre in Law upon the same the plaintiffe cannot refuse to joyne or wave his evidence and so on the other partie and the reason is for that matter in Law shall not be put in the mouth of Lay-men but the King in this case is at libertie Boulstons case 40. El. in communi Banco fol. 104. IT was adjudged that if a man make Cony-borrowes in his owne Land and the Conies encrease to so great a number that they destroy his Neighbours ground adjoyning The Neighbours may not have an action of the case for presently when the Coneys come into his Neighbours ground hee may kill them because they are ferae naturae And in this case it was resolved that none may newly erect a Dove-house but the Lord of a Mannor and if any doe he may be punished in
Indictment of the Trespasse and the party maketh the Obligation to another by the direction of the Sheriffe upon this condition as the Statute prescribes for the suerty of the Sheriffe c. and there it is holden that the Obligation is void because the Statute prescribes that the Obligation shall be made to the Sheriffe and that is part of the essentiall forme and so if the Sheriffe add to the condition that he shall be kept harmelesse against the King and the Plaintiffe c. this is void so if a Gaoler or a Sheriffe take an Obligation of the person with condition to be true Prisoner or to pay for his meat and drinke So if the Sheriffe add any other thing to the matter prescribed by the Statute as to pay such a Sum of money for a Horse c. This condition maketh all the Obligation void for it is taken in another forme touching the substance of the matter then is prescribed by the Statute but in Pasche 27. Eliz. in the Kings Bench in an Action of Debt brought by Sir William Drury late Sheriffe of Suffolke upon an Obligation of 20. l. against A. B. it appeared that the Defendant was solely bound in the same and with condition that one Moore who the Sheriffe had arrested upon a Latitat should appeare in person at the day contained in the Writ the Defendant pleaded the Statute 23. H. 6. and that the obligation was made in other forme then is mentioned in the Statute whereupon the Plaintiffe demurred in Law and it was Objected that there were 3. variances from the Statute Viz. one in the Obligation and two in the condition First in the Obligation for that there was but one surety and the Statute prescribes reasonable surety of sufficient persons in the Plurall number having sufficient within the said County c. in which case there ought to be two Sureties at the least and the Plurall number cannot be satisfied with the Singular number and so contrary to the words of the Statute And so was the Opinion of Mountegue Chiefe Justice of the common Place in the Case of Dive and Manningham Also in the condition that the Prisoner should appeare in person where the words of the Statute are that he should appeare generally without these words in person 2. That he should appeare at the day c. Ad respondendum where these words Ad respondendum are more then the Statute prescribes and therefore the Obligation is void c. but it was resolved by Sir Christopher Wray Sir Thomas Gaudy and all the Court that the Obligation was not void by the said Act. For to the first The words reasonable surety of sufficient persons are added for the surety of the Sheriffe and therefore if he will but take one surety be it at his perill for he shall be amerced if the Defendants appeare not and therefore the Statute doth not make void the Obligation in this Case for the same Branch that requires the forme requires also that the Obligation shall be made to the Sheriffe himselfe by the name of his Office and that the Prisoners should appeare in which clause no mention is made of the sureties so as the intent of the Act was that in so much as it was at the perill of the Sheriffe to leave to his discretion to take one or more for his indemnity and although the sureties have not sufficient within the same County as the Statute mentioneth yet the Obligation is good For these words of the Act as to this point are more for councell or direction of the Sheriffe then for precept or constraint to him and that for the safety of the Sheriffe for if the Defendant cannot find two sufficient persons having sufficient within the same County the Sheriffe is not bound to let him to Baile and this resolution agreeth with the ancient rule Quilibet potest reminutiare juri per se introducto And as concerning the second Additions to the condition of the said Obligation more then is in the Statute It was resolved that true it is there is a Verball difference of the forme prescribed by the Statute but not in the substance and effect for he that is so letten to Baile ought to appeare in person for so much is implyed in the words of the Act shall appeare and by the common Law every Tenant or Defendant ought to appeare in propper person and with this accordeth Fitz. Na. br 25. and he that ought to appeare ought to appeare Ad respondend parum differunt quae re concordant est ipsorum legistlatorum tanquam viva vox rebus non verbis legem imponere vide Dier 21. Eliz. 364. where the condition was in the conjunctive appeare and answer and yet the obligation good 27. Eliz. in Darby Hethcot if a Gaoler or Sheriffe for ease or inlargement of any Prisoner take promise to save him harmelesse that although the Statute speaketh onely of Obligations with condition yet it is an equall mischiefe And Wray Chiefe Justice said that the Statute should serve for small or nothing if the premises should not be taken to be within the Statute and the latter clause is generall Viz. If the Sheriffe take any Obligation in the other forme that it shall be void and within the equity of these words any Obligation an assumpsit is comprehended for the ancient Verses are Verba ligant homines taurorum cornua bones Cornu bos capitur voce ligatur homo Quando verba Statuti sunt specialia ratio autem generalis generaliter Statutum est intelligendum It was said that the Assumpsit did not bind the Prisoner at the common Law because the consideration was against the Law vide Dyer 19. Eliz. Oneleys Case Alfridus Denbawds Case 10. Jacobi fol. 102. In Error ONe Jury onely appeared at the Assizes to try an Issue in Trespasse a Tales de circumstantibus is awarded at the Prayer of the Plaintiffe the title of which was Nomina decem Talium and verdict and judgement was given against the Defendant who brings Error It was Objected 1. That the judgement was erroneous for the Title being Nomina 10. Talium the Sheriffe cannot returne 11. 2. Because the Statute speaketh with those persons that were before impannelled which cannot be satisfied where one onely appeareth as the Statute of Westm 2. c. 11. is not satisfied with one Auditor so of the Statute of Merton c 3. of Redisseisin It was resolved that the Tales was well awarded for the Statute shall be taken beneficially in favour of speedy Trialls and the title is the misprision of the Shetiffe which shall be amended The time of granting the Tales is when so many of the Jurors make default that the inquest cannot be taken if two of the principall pannell appeare and at the Prayer of the Plaintffe 12. de Circumstant are returned and then the two principalls are withdrawne now the triall shall be all by the 12. de circumstant but
is insufficient for 't is incertaine whether it be in the necke arme or belly and Indictments ought to be certaine and shew in what part the wound is and the profundity and latitude that it may appeare to the Court to be mortall and one of the wounds incertainly alledged makes the whole Indictment insufficient 'T was said that the indictment ought to have been that if the party had 〈◊〉 dyed of the first stroke that he dyed of the other and this is the common course Upon a suddaine affray if the Constable or any of his assistants in suppressing it be killed 't is murder in Law though the murderer knew not the party killed for the Law adjudges it murder and that he had malice prepense for that he opposed him against justice So in case of a Sheriffe or any of his Bayliffs or Officers in execution of processe so of a Watchman Walkers case 41. of the Queene fo 41. REsolved that an indictment of murder upon which the party was outlawed that he stroke the dead in sinistra parte ventris circa umbelicum was good for sinistra parte was sufficient and the other superfluous but in Youngs before there was no certainty before the circiter Heydens case 28. of the Queene fo 41. EXceptions to the indictment 1. Because 't was taken before B. Coronatore in Com' praed ' and doth not say de com' praed Resolved it shall be so taken by reasonable intendment and the Writ de coronatore eligendo is quia A. B. nuper unus Coronator ' in Com' tuo diem clausit c. and so 't is taken in Willoughbyes case in Plodon 2 because he doth not say that E. S. dead fuit in pace Dei dominae reginae Resolved that they are only words of forme to amplifie the hainousnesse of the offence not of substance and perchance he was not in peace 3. Because he doth not say felonicè nor ex malitia sua praecogita dedit c. Resolved that the word et couples the sentences together so that these words felonicè ex malitia c. and tunc ibidem makes it cleare 4. The profundity of the wound is not shewne Resolved it cannot be here for all the panne of the knee was cut off 5. 'T is said tempore feloniae praed ' murdredi where it should be murdri Resolved the first words were sufficient and then murdredum being a word insensible is superfluous and shall not hurt 6. The wound was the fourth of August the death the nineteenth of December and the indictment is that T M c. tempore feloniae murdredi praed ' viz. 4. Augusti felonicè fuer ' praesentes c. auxiliantes c. 'T was objected that the death hath relation to the stroke Resolved that indictments have been often adjudged insufficient when the stroke is one day the death another and the Jury conclude the death to be done the first day But here it ought to have been that they were praesentes auxiliantes c. ad feloniam murd ' praed ' and relation which is a fiction shall make no man a felon And Wray said that without question the yeare of bringing the appeale shall be accounted from the death not from the stroke Hume against Ogle 32. 33. of the Queene fo 42. ADjudged that the count that the defendant gave the stroke the 27. of September at D. in the County of N. and that her husband of the same stroke at D. c. dyed and so the said defendant murdered him at D. aforesaid 't was repugnant and insufficient for as it cannot be said that he murdered him the first day as Heydons case is before so neither at the place where the stroke was but where he dyed Hudson and Lees case 31. of the Queene fo 43. IN an appeale H. counted that the defendant c. felonicè maimed him in his left hand the defendant pleaded that before c the plaintiffe recovered in Trespas for the same battery and wounding 200. l. and satisfaction acknowledged Resolved 〈◊〉 the barre is good for where the plaintiffe is to recover damage onely as in this case of the appeale 〈◊〉 shall not be twice satisfied for the same thing nem◠debet bis puniri pro uno delicto And here the wounding in the first action includes the mayhem more and the defendant hath averred that the wounding in the first action and the mayhem here is one Syers case 32. of the Queene fo 43. REsolved if the principall be pardoned or hath his Clergy the accessory cannot be arraigned for 't is a Maxime Vbi factum nullum ibi fortia nulla ubi non est principalis non potest esse accessorius and none can be principall before it be so adjudged by Law viz. by judgement upon verdict or confession or by Outlawry and it suffises not that in truth he be principall and the acceptance of pardon or prayer of Clergy is an argument but no judgement in Law that he is guilty But if the principall after attainder be pardoned or hath his Clergy the accessory shall be arraigned for it appeares judicially that there was a principall Bibithes case 39. of the Queene fo 43. REsolved that where the principall was found guilty of man-slaughter and not guilty of murder and had his Clergy the accessory shall be discharged for till judgement it doth not appeare judicially that there was a principall So if the principall upon his arraignment confesses the felony before judgement obteines pardon or hath Clergy Resolved that there cannot be an accessory before the fact in man-slaughter for 't is upon a suddaine affray and if premeditated 't is murder Vauxes case 33. of the Queene fo 44. REsolved that where a man was indicted for poysoning another perswading him that the potion mixt with Cantharides would cause him to have issue by his wife the indictment nesciens praed ' potum cum veneno fore mixtum sed fidem adhibens praed ' persuasioni dict' W. V. recepit bibit was insufficient for 't is not expressed that he received the poyson for venenum praed ' wants and the words after immediatè post receptionem veneni praed ' are not sufficient to maintaine an indictment which ought to be certaine and not by implication Resolved that Vaux who perswaded was a principall murderer though he was not present at the receit of the poyson and here he cannot be accessory for there is no principall and if any one had procured V. to doe it he had been accessory before which note a speciall case where principall and accessory both are absent at the time of the felony Resolved that auter foits acquite here is no plea for he was discharged upon an arraignement upon this insufficient indictment and the former acquittall or conviction ought to be lawfull and the Maxime is That the life of a man shall not be twice in jeopardy for one
In cur wardo fol. 68. IN a devise of Lands by writing an averment out of the will shall not be received for a Will concerning Lands c. ought to be in Writing and not by any averrment out of the same otherwise it were great inconvenience that not any might know by the written words of the will what construction to make if it might be controuled by collaterall averrment out of the will Cases of Vsury Burtons Case 34. Eliz. banco regis fo 69. A. Lends to T. W. 100. l. 7. July 21. Eliz. in consideration of which T. W. grants to him a rent charge of 20. l. per annum the first payment to be at the Nativity 1580. upon condition of payment of the said 100. l. this is out of the Statute of Usury for he had a 100. l. for a yeare and a quarter without consideration and if he pay it within this Time A. shall not have the rent so that he was not assured of any consideration But if it were agreed betweene them that the 100. l. shall not be payd this is within the meaning of the Statute A Demurrer is a confession of all such matters in fact onely as are well and sufficiently pleaded Claytons Case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 70. THirty pound was lent for halfe a yeare to have for it thirty-three pound if the sonne of the obligee be then in life if not 27. pound this is within the intent of the Statute of Usury Vsura dicitur ab usu aere quasi usuaera 1. usus aeris Et usura est commodum certum quod propter usum rei mutuatae recipitur Glanvile lib. 7. cap. 16. Hoes Case 34. Eliz. fo 70. A Duty certaine upon a condition subsequent may be released before the day of the performance of the condition but a dutie uncertaine at the first and upon condition precedent to be made certaine after this in the meane time is but onely a meere possibilitie and therefore cannot be released And it was adjudged 4. El. in communi Banco that by a release of all actions suites and quarrels a covenant before breach of it is not released thereby But by a release of covenants the covenantor is discharged before the breach vide Litt ' 170. A release in the time of vacation to the Patron dischargeth an annuitie wherewith the Parson is charged in respect of the parsonage and a warranty may be released before suite because he may have a warrantia chartae St. Johns case 34. El. Banco Regis fol. 71. DAggs Pistolls c. are within the Statute of 33. H. 8. ca ' 6. the same Statute doth prohibite Crosse-bowes and under the same name stone-bowes are forbidden for if a small alteration or addition should defeat the penaltie of the act the Statute should be of small effect And it was resolved that the Sheriffe or any of his Officers for the better execution of Justice may carry handguns or other weapons invasive or defensive and not restreined by the generall prohibition of the said act vide 3o. H. 7. fo 1. Williams case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 72. ONe man shall not have an action of the case for common Nusans made in the high way because it is a common Nusans and it is not reason that any particular person should have an action for then every particular person might have an action for the same and so thereby one might be punished an hundred times for one cause But if any particular person have more particular damage then another hee may have a particular action upon the case for this particular injury for common Nusances which are equall to all the Kings people the common Law hath appointed other Courts viz. Leets c. A prescription to doe divine service in a Chappell for the Lord and his tenants is remediable onely in the Court Christian but for the Lord and his private family an action of the case lyeth for the Lord onely Case of Orphanes of London 35. El. Banco Regis fol. 73. IF any Orphane of London sue for goods c. in the Court Christian or of Requests a prohibition lyeth because their government by their custome belongs to the Major of L. So if a Will be proved in the Court Christian the probate whereof belongeth to the Lord of a Mannor Wymarkes case 36. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 74. PLaintiffe in an Ejectione firmae counts of a Lease of R. S. the defendant pleads in barre an Indenture of bargaine and sale and sheweth it by the said R. S. to E. W. who was seised untill disseised by R. S. who leased to the plaintiffe and he as servant to E. W. enters Three Termes after the plaintiffe replies that the bargaine and sale was upon condition which was broken and the bargainor entred and leased to him and did not shew forth the deed of bargaine and sale Judgement given for the defendant 1. Resol When a Deed is shewed to the Court it remaineth in the Court all the Terme in Judgement of Law because the Terme is but one day in Law and this as well to strangers as parties to take advantage thereof without shewing but at the end of the Terme it shall be delivered to the party if it be not denied for then it shall remaine in Court to be damned if it be found not his Deed. 2. The Course in the Kings Bench is that Imparlances to plead in barre are entred but not Imparlances to Reply or rejoyne so that the Replication here although it be three Termes after the Barre yet it shall be intended here the same Terme and so he shall not need to shew the Deed. Cliftons case 35. Eliz. fol. 75. IF a woman tenant for life take an husband which committeth wast and after the wife dyeth the husband is dispunishable of and for such wast for the Writ is Quare cum de communi consilio c. provisum sit quod non liceat alicui vastum venditionem seu destructionem facere de terris c. sibi demissis ad terminum vitae vel annorum c. And in this case the husband hath not any estate for life in this Land but the wife hath estate for life and the husband but onely an estate in her right and so he is not within the Act. Pilkintons case 43. Eliz. in banco le Roy. fo 76. IT was resolved Per tot ' Cur ' that when a distresse is taken for damage fesant that the party may tender amends untill the beasts be impounded but after they be in the pound they are in the custody of the Law and then the tender cometh too late It was also resolved that tender of amends to the Bayliffe or servant that taketh them will not serve for he cannot deliver the distresse once taken no more then change the avoury of his Master or demand rent upon a condition of reentry The Earle of Pembrookes case 36. El. Banco Regis fol. 76. WHere the defendant sheweth a
none will buy their Wardships 5. After Tender and refusall if the heire be made Knight and marry he shall not forfeite the double value because he is out of Ward but immediatly the Lord shall have a Writte de valore maritagij This was the last Case that Sir John Popham chiefe Justice of England c. ever Argued Sir George Cursons case 7. Jac. Cur. Wardor fol. 75. SIr W. L. seised of a reversion expectant upon taile made to his sonne of land in Capite Covenants to stand seised to the use of his neece the sonne dyeth the King shall not have primier seisin 1. Resol It was Collusion apparent within the Statute of Marlebr cap. 6. to infeoffe the heire apparent and if he infeoffe others upon Collusion averrable but no averrement shall be where the remainder or reversion is left in a stranger or upon a Devise 2. Or otherwise to dispose in the Statute of 32. H. 8. have relation to wills onely for before the Statute every man might dispose of his lands by act executed 3. The Clause in the said Statute which saveth primier seisin to the King hath relation onely to acts executed for the King shall have without that primier seisin of the third part not devised but without that he shall not have it of any part conveyed by act executed 4. If the grandfather convey land to the sonne living the father this is out of the Statute otherwise if the father be dead and so a gift to a Collaterall Kinsman who is not heire apparent is out of the Statute for none will by intendment disinherit his heire to defeate the King of the Wardship or primer seisin and so is the experience of the Court of Wards Bullens case 5. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 77. THe Lord may have a certeine summe pro certo letae for it shall be intended it was granted at the first by purchase of the Leete for the ease of the Tenants and in consideration of the Lords claiming of it at his owne costs every Eyre The issue was if the plaintiffe was a chiefe pledge and by speciall verdict he was found a Resiant and certified by the chiefe pledges to be a chiefe pledge and was amerced for his default It seemeth he was not Sed materia praedicta consopita fuit in arbitrio See 30. E. 3.23 of franke pledges Lord Abergavenies case Com. Banco fol. 78. A Judgement in an action of Debt is had against a joyntenant for life who afterwards releaseth to his companion all the right c. yet that moytie is liable to the Judgement and so it is of a rent charge during the life of the Releasor Sir Edward Phyttons case Com. Banco fol. 79. EXecutors may take benefit of the Kings generall pardon by which is enacted that all Subjects of the King their heires Successors Executors and Administrators shall be acquitted and discharged of all offences contempts c. and that shall be expounded most beneficially for the Subject And further doth give and grant all goods Chattells Debts c. forfeited And prohibiteth any Clerke to make out any Writte c. Provided that every Clerke may make forth cap. ut at the suite of the plaintiffe against persons outlawed to the intent to compell them to answer and that the partie shall sue forth a scir fac before the pardon in that behalfe shall be allowed which is as much to say having regard onely to the plaintiffe But in regard of the King it is an absolute pardon and grant of his goods and he is a person inabled against the King but not against the partie plaintiffe And every person by himselfe or his Atturney may plead this act for discharge Executors shall have restitution upon the Statute 21. H. 8. Also Administrators shall have a Writt of error upon the Statute 27. El as was adjudged in the Lord Mordants case 36. El. And yet these Statutes speake onely of the partie and not of the Executors or Administrators because no Writt can be against Executors they may plead it without Processe The End of the Sixth Booke THE SEAVENTH BOOK Postnati Calvins case 6. Jacobi Banco Regis fol. 1. R C. By his gardian bringeth an assize the defendants say the plaintiffe ought not to be answered Quia est alienigena natus 5o. Novembris Anno Domini Regis Angliae c. tertio apud E. infra regnum Scotiae ac infra ligeanciam Domini Regis Regni sui S. ac extra ligeanciam Regni sui Angl. c. the plaintiffe demurreth The Case was Adjourned into the Exchequer Chamber and was argued by two Justices every day and by the Chancellour and resolved by the Chancellour and all the Justices except Walmesley and Foster that the plaintiffe ought to be answered For these six demonstrative Conclusions drawne from the Law of Nature the Law of the Land Reasons of State and Authorities of Records and Booke Cases 1 Every one that is an Alien by birth may be or might have been an Enemy by accident but C. could never be an Enemy by any accident whatsoever ergo no Alien by birth 2. Whosoever are borne under one naturall ligeance due by the Law 〈◊〉 nature to one Soveraigne are naturall borne Subjects But C. was borne under one c. ergo a naturall borne Subject 3. Whosoever is borne within the Kings protection is no Alien But C. was borne under c ergo he is no Alien 4. Every stranger borne must at his birth be either amicus or inimicus but C. at his birth could neither be amicus nor inimicus because he was subditus ergo no stranger borne 5. Whatsoever is due by the Law of man may be altered but naturall legeance of the Subject to the Soveraigne cannot be altered ergo not due by mans Law Lastly whosoever at his birth cannot be an alien to the King of E. cannot be an alien to any of his Subjects of E. but C. at his birth could be no alien to the King of E. Ergo he cannot be an alien to any of the Subjects of E. the Maior and Minor both be Propositiones perspicuè verae and although Alienigena dicitur ab aliena gente yet that is all one as Alienae ligeantiae and arguments drawne from Etymologie are feeble for Saepenemero ubi proprietas verborum attenditur sensus veritatis amittitur yet when they agree with Law Judges may use them for Ornament and dâ—verse inconveniences would follow if the Plea against the Plaintiffe should be allowed For first it maketh legeance locall wereupon should follow first that legeance which is universall should be confined within locall limits 2. That the Subject should not be bound to serve the King in Peace or in Warre out of those bounds 3. It should illegitimate many which were borne in Gascayne Guyan Normandy c. and diverse others of his Majesties Dominions whilst the same were in actuall obedience And lastly this strange and new devised Plea inclineth too much to
of Action he shall not have judgement a Count may be made good by barre and a barre by replication in matters of circumstance but not of substance See there seaven things observed by Cooke for the better direction of the President and Comminalty of the said Colledge hereafter The Case of the City of London 7. Jac. fol. 121. IT is a good custome within a Citty that a Forreinor within the said Citty shall not sell things by retaile and it is good also upon paine of 5. l. but it is not good by Charter therefore Citties which are incorporate within time of memory cannot have such priviledges without Parliament so of a custome that goods forreigne bought and forreigne sould shall be forfeited So one may prescribe to have a Bake-house in a Towne and that no other shall have one there and the Statutes which provide that every one may sell in retaile or in grosse extend onely to Merchands aliens and demisens who export and import things vendible Three inconveniences by confluence of people to London c. The Case of Thetford Schoole fol. 130. 8. Jac. LAnds of the yearely value of 35. l. in ao 9. El. was devised by the will of Thomas Fulmerston to certeine persons and their Heires for maintainance of a Preacher four dayes in the yeare of the Master and Usher of a free Grammar-Schoole and foure poore People Viz. Two men and two women and the Defendant delayed to accept a Release to defraud the Plaintiffe adjudged for the Plaintiffe 1. Although that two recoveries are without covin yet the composition so operates that nothing shall be accounted administred but onely so much as he hath paid by composition and the converting of any part to his owne use and the deferring to accept a Release is against the office of an Executor and shall not aide him 2. The barre is insufficient because he hath not shewed that the Court of C. had power to hold plea of debt 2. Because he hath not shewed that the Testator was bound in an Obligation and if it were onely upon contract the administrators were not chargable in Debt 3. Be the replication evill yet because the Barre is insufficient the Plaintiffe shall have judgement because he had not shewed any thing against himselfe but if it appeare by the replication that he had no cause of Action he shall be barred Mary Shipleys Case 8. Jac. fol. 134. AN action of Debt against an Executor of 200. l. the Defendant pleaded Plene administravit the Plaintiffe replies that the Executor had assets the Jury found assets to the value of 172. l. judgement was given to recover the whole Debt of 200. l. and damages and costs of the goods of the Testator S. c. Et si non then the damages of the proper goods of the Defendant Sir John Nedhams Case 8. Jacobi Communi Banco fol. 135. IN debt as administratrix upon administration committed by the Bishop of R. the Defendant pleads administration committed unto him by the Deane and Chapter of C. sede vacante because the Intestate had bona notabilia c. the Plaintiffe replyes that that administration was repealed adi for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol Because it is not shewed that the Intestate had bona notabilia c. it shall be intended that he had not and yet the administration is not voyde but voydable 2. Before the repeale of administration committed by the Metropolitan the inferior Ordinary may commit administration because this is by the repeale declared voyd ab initio and an administration is but an authority which may well commence in futuro 3. The committing of administration to the obligor hath not extinguished the bebt because it is in anothers right otherwise it is if the obligee himself make the Obligor his executor because this is his owne act De bonis defuncti trina dispositio 1. Necessitatis ut funeralia 2 Vtilitatis that every one shall be payd in due order 3. Voluntatis as Legacies Sir Francis Barringtons Case 8. Jacobi Communi Banco fol. 136. THe Lord R. granted wood within a Forrest in which the Plaintiffe had common which grant is confirmed by Statute the grantee cuts wood and inclose it the commoner shall loose his common for seven yeares 1. Resol The grantee had an inheritance to take in another soyle and the soyle is to the Lord R. 2. Although the grantee had not the inheritance yet the Statute extends to him and he may inclose for the Statute is or any other person to whom wood is sould 3. 22. E. 4. cap. 7. extends to wood which one had in severalty and not where another had common there for at the common Law one who had wood in a Forrest cannot incloser against a commoner but if it be his severall wood he might inclose parvo fossato c. for three yeares 4. The sayd Statute is as a conveyance betweene the King and his Subjects which taketh not away the right of third persons as the commoner here is 5. In the sayd Statute there is a clause that hee may inclose without suing to the King or other owner so that power is given against them and not against a commoner Beasts of Forrest are Hart Hinde Hare wilde Boare and Wolfe of chase Buck Doe Fox Martin and Roe 6. By the Statute of 35. H. 8. cap. 17. he is barred of his common which provideth that no Beasts shall be suffered to come there for seven yeares 7. The Statutes which concerne Forrests are generall because they concerne the King and the Court shall take notice of them Doctor Druries Case 8. Jacob. fol. 141. DOctor Drury recovers against B. who is outlawed and taken by Capias ut-legatum and escapeth the Utlary is reversed Doctor Drury sueth execution B. brings an Audita quaerela adjudged that it lyeth not It was resolved that if A. be in execution at the suit of B. upon an erroneous judgement and after escape and after the judgement is reversed by a Writ of error the action against the Sheriffe is extinct for hee may plead Nul tiel record But untill it be reversed it remaines in force be it never so erroneous and if the partie have judgement and execution upon the escape against the Sheriffe or Goaler and after the first judgement is reversed yet for as much as judgement upon this collaterall thing is executed it shall remaine in force notwithstanding the reversall of the first 7. H. 6. 4. Yet it seemeth to me he may have remedy by Audita quaerela for that the ground and cause of the collaterall action is disproved by the reversall of the first judgement a difference betweene meane acts compulsatory and voluntary and betweene a recovery by eigne title and reversall of a recovery Davenports Case 8. Jacobi fol 144. TEnant for yeares of an advowson granteth proximam advocationem donationem si eadem Ecclesia contingerit vacua fore durante termino c. And afterward surrenders his terme yet if
inqure of the value if they finde for the Plaintiffe as in an Assize if issue be joyned upon a release and found for the Plaintiffe yet the recognitors must inquire of the seisin and disseisin and this defect shall not be supplyed with a Writ of inquiry because then the Defendant would be prevented of his Writ of attaint But if the Court ought to inquire of things whereof no attaint lyeth this being but of Office it may be supplyed by a Writ of inquiry as the foure points in a Quare impedit Viz. De plenitudine ex cujus praesentatione si tempus semestre transierit and the value of the Church per annum and in the case at Barr by the rule of the Court a new Venire facias was awarded The Case of the Maior and Burgesses of Lynn Regis touching misnaming of Corporations 11. Jacobi fol. 122. Communi Banco H. 8. in the 29. yeare of his Reigne did incorporate that Towne by the name of Majoris Burgensium burgi domini Regis de Lynn Regis and one made an Obligation to them by the name of Maior and Burgesses of Lynn Regis omitting these words Burgi Regis this is good because it is the same name in substance and doth not vary in materiall words and though it be not Idem nomen sillabis yet it is Re sensu for Burgesses that implyes it is a Burrough for Burroughs and Burgesses are conjugata and by Lynn Regis it appeares that it is Burgus suus i. Regis a fortiori because there is no other Corporation of the same name Apices juris non sunt jura there may be a difference betweene ancient Corporations and new for ancient Corporations may by usage have severall names and the Maior and Burgesses notwithstanding Non est factum pleaded had judgment to recover William Cluns Case 11. Jacobi fol. 127. Banco Regis A Lease for yeares if the Lessor should so long live rendring Rent at the foure Feasts or within thirteen weeks after after one of the Feasts the Lessor dyeth and before the thirteene weekes be past the Executor brings debt against the Lessee and the Defendant demurreth upon the Count and it was adjudged a good demurrer and that the action did not lye 1. Because the disjun ive is added for the benefit of the Lessee and the first day was but for voluntary payment but the legall time of payment was the end of the thirteene weeks before which when the Lessor dyeth the Lessee is discharged by act of God for that Quarter if Lessee before the day pay the Rent this is voluntary and not satisfactory but it is good to give seisin if payment be in the morning and the Lessor dyeth at noon this is voluntary and satisfactory against the heire but not against the King Payment the last instant of the day is satisfactory and after the day it is coercive and satisfactory 2. When the first day is past it is as if the Rent had been onely reserved the second day for the election is good 3. The rent is to he payd out of the profits of the Land Ergo in regard of time it shall not be apportioned and if the Lessor dye betwixt the first day and the last day his heire and not the Executor shall have the rent because it was not then due if a man lease for yeares rendring Rent at M. or within a moneth after with a condition of re-entry and the Lessee tenders it at the last instant of M. the Lessor shall not re-enter upon demand the last day of the moneth because the Lessee had liberty to pay it then and the difference was taken betwixt the sayd disjunctive Reservation and when the reservation is at a certaine Feast and a condition is added that if it be arrere by the space of a moneth after the Feast that then the Lessor c. there the Lessee for salvation of his Lease cannot tender it at the last instant of the Feast because he had no such liberty as in the other Case A Lease for yeares rendring Rent at M. or within twelve dayes after upon condition to re-enter if it be arreare by the space of twelve dayes after any of the sayd Feasts or dayes the Lessee shall have twenty foure dayes in safegard of his Lease after the Feast of M. and in the Case at Barr judgement given Quod quaerens nil capiat per billam James Osbornes Case 11. Jacobi fol. 130. Banco Regis IN an action upon the Case for that the Plaintiffe had bought of the Defendant diverse goods which he refused to deliver whereof one was unum fulchrum lecti Anglice a Feild Bedstead with a Testerne and Curtaines of Saye the Plaintiffe recovers and damages assessed intirely where none ought to be given for the Testerne c. for Fulchrum signifieth a Bedstead onely upon errour brought therefore judgement was affirmed for one thing onely is here put in issue for the other things are not alleadged Positive sed expositive and are nugation but when two things are put in issue or Obliqué inquired of by the Jury there it is not good and it shall not be intended that damages were given for that onely for which the action was brought but in an action upon the Case for words spoken at one time whereof some are actionable and some not there damages may be assessed intirely and shall be intended to be given for the words actionable onely 1. Because the Plaintiffe must declare as the words were 2. Because the words not actionable aggravate the damages otherwise if spoken at severall times but here damages shall be intended to be for that which is actionable onely and the rest as if never alleadged and in Writs or Pleas English words are not admitted by 36. E. 3. cap. 15. except they be parcell of a name as Jo. in the Hall 2. words which passe under the name of Latine are 1. Good Grammaticall Latine 2. Words significant in Law and not in Grammar 3. Incongruous Latine which doth not vitiate a Plea or Grant nor judiciall Writ 4. Words insensible having no countenance of Latine and are rejected but fained words as Velnetum Stapedia c. are good Read and Redmans Case 10. Jacobi fol. 134. THe Defendant in debt brought by two Executors pleads the death of him who was summoned and severed Resolved The Writ shall not abate if two purchase an originall reall action and one dyeth pending the Writ this shall abate in all as in case of joyntenants or parceners where one dyeth having issue or no issue because that shee may have a Writ for the whole and shall not recover a moity and one shall not recover upon a false reall Writ or unapt for his Case in respect hee may have an apt Writ although it happen after by act of God but if two purchase a judicial Writ and one is summoned and severed and dyes without issue the Writ shal not abate the same law where jointenants