immediate height of the Mountain So for instance the Mountains of the Moon in Africa whence the Nile flows and after a long course falls into the Mediterranean Sea by Egypt are so much higher than the surface of that Sea first as the Ascent of the Land is from the Sea to the foot of the Mountains and then as the height of the Mountains is from the bottom to the top For both these are to be computed when you measure the height of a Mountain or of a mountainous Land in respect of the Sea And the height of Mountains to the Sea being thus computed there would be need of six or eight Oceans to raise the Sea alone as high as the highest In-land Mountains And this is more than enough to compensate the less quantity of Water that would be requisite upon the Land Besides we must consider the Regions of the Air upwards to be more capacious than a Region of the same thickness in or near the Earth so as if an Ocean pour'd upon the surface of the dry Land supposing it were all smooth would rise to the height of half a quarter of a mile every where the like quantity of Water pour'd again at the height of the Mountains would not have altogether the same effect or would not there raise the mass half a quarter of a mile higher for the surfaces of a Globe the farther they are from their Center are the greater and so accordingly the Regions that belong to them And lastly we must consider that there are some Countries or Valleys very low and also many Caverns or Cavities within the Earth all which in this case were to be first fill'd with Water These things being compar'd and estimated we shall find that notwithstanding the room that Hills and Mountains take up on the dry Land there would be at least eight Oceans requir'd or a quantity of Water eight times as great as the Ocean to bring an Universal Deluge upon the Earth as that Deluge is ordinarily understood and explained The proportion of Water for the Deluge being thus stated the next thing to be done is to enquire where this Water is to be found if any part of the Sublunary World will afford us so much Eight Oceans floating in the Air make a great bulk of Water I do not know what possible Sources to draw it from There are the Clouds above and the Deeps below and in the bowels of the Earth and these are all the stores we have for Water and Moses directs us to no other for the Causes of the Deluge The Fountains he saith of the great Abysse were broken up or burst asunder and the Rain descended for forty days the Cataracts or Floodgates of Heaven being open'd And in these two no doubt are contain'd the causes of the great Deluge as according to Moses so also according to reason and necessity for our World affords no other treasures of Water Let us therefore consider how much this Rain of Forty Days might amount to and how much might flow out of the Abysse that so we may judge whether these two in conjunction would make up the Eight Oceans which we want As for the Rains they would not afford us one Ocean nor half an Ocean nor the tenth part of an Ocean if we may trust to the Observations made by others concerning the quantity of Water that falls in Rain Mersennus gives us this account of it It appears by our Observations that a Cubical Vessel of Brass whereof we made use is fill'd an inch and an half in half an hours time but because that sucks up noâ—hing of the moisture as the Earth doth let us take an inch for half an hours Rain whence it follows that in the space of 40 days and nights Rain the Waters in the Deluge would rise 160 feet if the Rains were constant and equal to ours and that it rain'd at once throughout the face of the whole Earth But the Rain of the Deluge saith he should have been 90 times greater than this to cover for instance the Mountains of Armenia or to reach 15 Cubits above them So that according to his computation the 40 days Rain would supply little more than the hundredth part of the Water requisite to make the Deluge 'T is true he makes the heighth of the Mountains higher than we do but however if you temper the Calculation on all sides as much as you please the water that came by this Rain would be a very inconsiderable part of what was necessary for a Deluge If it rain'd 40 days and 40 nights throughout the face of the whole Earth in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere all at once it might be sufficient to lay all the lower grounds under water but it would signifie very little as to the over-flowing of the Mountains Whence another Author upon the same occasion hath this passage If the Deluge had been made by Rains only there would not have needed 40 days but 40 years Rain to have brought it to pass And if we should suppose the whole middle Region condens'd into water it would not at all have been sufficient for this effect according to that proportion some make betwixt Air and Water for they say Air turn'd into Water takes up a hundred times less room than it did before The truth is we may reasonably suppose that all the vapours of the middle Region were turn'd into water in this 40 days and 40 nights Rain if we admit that this Rain was throughout the whole Earth at once in either Hemisphere in every Zone in every Climate in every Country in every Province in every Field and yet we see what a small proportion all this would amount to Having done then with these Superiour Regions we are next to examine the Inferiour and the treasures of water that may be had there Moses tells us that the Fountains of the great Abysse were broke open or clove asunder as the word there us'd doth imply and no doubt in this lay the great mystery of the Deluge as will appear when it comes to be rightly understood and explain'd but we are here to consider what is generally understood by the great Abysse in the common explication of the Deluge and 't is commonly interpreted either to be the Sea or Subterraneous waters hid in the bowels of the Earth These they say broke forth and rais'd the waters caus'd by the Rain to such an height that together they overflowed the highest Mountains But whether or how this could be deserves to be a little examin'd And in the first place the Sea is not higher than the Land as some have formerly imagin'd fansying the Sea stood as it were upon a heap higher than the shore and at the Deluge a relaxation being made it overflow'd the Land But this conceit is so gross and so much against reason and experience that none I think of late have ventur'd to make use of it And yet on the
Perfection but seeing they have not determin'd in any definite numbers what the length of every Age will be nor given us the summ of all we cannot draw any conclusion from this account as to the point in question before us But must proceed to the Jewish and Christian Oracles The Iews have a remarkable Prophecy which expresseth both the whole and the parts of the World's duration The World they say will stand Six Thousand Years Two Thousand before the Law Two Thousand under the Law and Two Thousand under the Messiah This Prophecy they derive from Elias but there were two of the Name Elias the Thesbite and Elias the Rabbin or Cabbalist and 't is suppos'd to belong immediately to the latter of these Yet this does not hinder in my opinion but that it might come originally from the former Elias and was preserv'd in the School of this Elias the Rabbin and first made publick by him Or he added it may be that division of the time into three parts and so got a Title to the whole I cannot easily imagine that a Doctor that liv'd two hundred years or thereabouts before Christ when Prophecy had ceas'd for some Ages amongst the Iews should take upon him to dictate a Prophecy about the duration of the World unless he had been supported by some antecedent Cabbalistical Tradition which being kept more secret before he took the liberty to make publick and so was reputed the Author of the Prophecy As many Philosophers amongst the Greeks were the reputed Authors of such doctrines as were much more ancient than themselves But they were the publishers of them in their Country or the revivers of them after a long silence and so by forgetful posterity got the honour of the first invention You will think it may be the time is too long and the distance too great betwixt Elias the Thesbite and this Elias the Rabbin for a Tradition to subsist all the while or be preserv'd with any competent integrity But it appears from S. Iude's Epistle that the Prophecies of Enoch who liv'd before the Floud relating to the day of judgment and the end of the World were extant in his time either in Writing or by Tradition And the distance betwixt Enoch and S. Iude was vastly greater than betwixt the two Elias's Nor was any fitter to be inspir'd with that knowledge or to tell the first news of that fatal period than the old Prophet Elias who is to come again and bring the alarum of the approaching Conflagration But however this conjecture may prove as to the original Author of this Prophecy the Prophecy it self concerning the Sexmillennial duration of the World is very much insisted upon by the Christian Fathers Which yet I believe is not so much for the bare Authority of the Tradition as because they thought it was founded in the History of the Six days Creation and the Sabbath succeeding as also in some other Typical precepts and usages in the Law of Moses But before we speak of that give me leave to name some of those Fathers to you that were of this judgment and supposed the great Sabbatism would succeed after the World had stood Six Thousand Years Of this opinion was S. Barnabas in his Catholick Epistle ch 15. Where he argues that the Creation will be ended in Six Thousand Years as it was finish'd in Six Days Every day according to the Sacred and mystical account being a Thousand Years Of the same judgment is S. Irenaeus both as to the conclusion and the reason of it He saith the History of the Creation in six days is a narration as to what is past and a Prophecy of what is to come As the Work was said to be consummated in six days and the Sabbath to be the seventh So the consummation of all things will be in Six Thousand Years and then the great Sabbatism to come on in the blessed reign of Christ. Hippolitus Martyr disciple of Irenaeus is of the same judgment as you may see in Photius ch 202. Lactantius in his Divine Institutions l. 7. c. 14. gives the very same account of the state and continuance of the World and the same proofs for it And so does S. Cyprian in his Exhortation to Martyrdom ch 11. S Ierome more than once declares himself of the same opinion and S. Austin tho' he wavers and was doubtful as to the Millennium or Reign of Christ upon Earth yet he receives this computation without hesitancy and upon the foremention'd grounds So Iohannes Damascenus de fide Orthodoxâ takes seven Millennaries for the entire space of the World from the Creation to the general Resurrection the Sabbatism being included And that this was a received and approv'd opinion in early times we may collect from the Author of the Questions and answers ad Orthodoxos in Iustin Martyr Who giving an answer to that enquiry about the six thousand-years term of the World says We may conjecture from many places of Scripture that those are in the right that say six thousand years is the time prefixt for the duration of this present frame of the World These Authors I have examin'd my self but there are many others brought in confirmation of this opinion as S. Hilary Anastasius Sinaita Sanctus Gaudentius Q. Iulius Hilarion Iunilius Africanus Isidorus Hispalensis Cassiodorus Gregorius Magnus and others which I leave to be examin'd by those that have curiosity and leisure to do it In the mean time it must be confest that many of these Fathers were under a mistake in one respect in that they generally thought the World was near an end in their time An errour which we need not take pains to confute now seeing we who live twelve hundred or fourteen hundred years after them find the World still in being and likely to continue so for some considerable time But it is easie to discern whence their mistake proceeded not from this Prophecy alone but because they reckon'd this Prophecy according to the Chronology of the Septuagint which setting back the beginning of the World many Ages beyond the Hebrew these six thousand years were very near expir'd in the time of those Fathers and that made them conclude that the World was very near an end We will make no reflections in this place upon that Chronology of the Septuagint lest it should too much interrupt the thred of our discourse But it is necessary to shew how the Fathers grounded this computation of Six Thousand Years upon Scripture 'T was chiefly as we suggested before upon the Hexameron or the Creation finish'd in Six Days and the Sabbath ensuing The Sabbath they said was a type of the Sabbatism that was to follow at the end of the World according to S. Paul to the Hebrews and then by analogy and consequence the six days preceding the Sabbath must note the space and duration of the World If therefore 〈◊〉 could discover how much a Day is reckon'd for in this mystical
computation the sum of the six days would be easily found out And they think that according to the Psalmist Psal. 90. 4. and S. Peter 2 Epist. 3. 8. a Day may be estimated a thousand years and consequently six days must be counted six thousand years for the duration of the World This is their interpretation and their inference but it must be acknowledged that there is an essential weakness in all typical and allegorical argumentations in comparison of literal And thâ—s being allow'd in diminution of the proof we may be bold to say that nothing yet appears either in Nature or Scripture or Humane Affairs repugnant to this supposition of Six Thousand Years which hath Antiquity and the Authority of the Fathers on its side We proceed now to the Christian Prophecies concerning the end of the World I do not mention those in Daniel because I am not satisfied that any there excepting that of the Fifth Kingdom it self extend so far But in the Apocalypse of S. Iohn which is the last Revelation we are to expect there are several Prophecies that reach to the Consummation of this World and the First Resurrection The Seven Seals the Seven Trumpets the Seven Vials do all terminate upon that great Period But they are rather Historical Prophecies than Chronological they tell us in their Language the Events but do not measure or express the time wherein they come to pass Others there are that may be call'd Chronological as the treading under foot the holy City forty and two months Apoc. 11. 2. The Witnesses opposing Antichrist one thousand two hundred and sixty days Apoc. 11. 3. The flight of the Woman into the Wilderness for the same number of days or for a Time Times and half a Time Apoc. 12. 6. 14. And lastly The War of the Beast against the Saints forty two months Apoc. 13. 5. These all you see express a time for their completion and all the same time if I be not mistaken But they do not reach to the End of the World Or if some of them did reach so far yet because we do not certainly know where to fix their beginning we must still be at a loss when or in what year they will expire As for instance If the Reign of the Beast or the Preaching of the Witnesses be 1260 years as is reasonably suppos'd yet if we do not know certainly when this Reign or this Preaching begun neither can we tell when it will end And the Epocha's or beginnings of these Prophecies are so differently calculated and are things of so long debate as makes the discussion of them altogether improper for this place Yet it must be confest that the best conjectures that can be made concerning the approaching End of the World must be taken from a judicious examination of these points and according as we gather up the Prophecies of the Apocalypse in a successive completion we see how by degrees we draw nearer and nearer to the conclusion of all But till some of these enlightning Prophecies be accomplish'd we are as a Man that awakes in the Night all is dark about him and he knows not how far the Night is spent but if he watch till the light appears the first glimpses of that will resolve his doubts We must have a little patience and I think but a little still eyeing those Prophecies of the Resurrection of the Witnesses and the depression of Antichrist till by their accomplishment the day dawn and the Clouds begin to change their colour Then we shall be able to make a near guess when the Sun of righteousness will arise So much for Prophecies There are also Signs which are look'd upon us forerunners of the coming of our Saviour and therefore may give us some direction how to judge of the distance or approach of that great Day Thus many of the Fathers thought the coming of Antichrist would be a sign to give the World notice of its approaching end But we may easily see by what hath been noted before what it was that led the Fathers into that mistake They thought their six thousand years were near an end as they truly were according to that Chronology they followed and therefore they concluded the Reign of Antichrist must be very short whensoever he came and that he could not come long before the end of the World But we are very well assur'd from the Revelation of Saint Iohn that the reign of Antichrist is not to be so short and transient and from the prospect and history of Christendom that he hath been already upon his Throne many hundreds of Years Therefore this Sign wholly falls to the ground unless you will take it from the fall of Antichrist rather than from his first entrance Others expect the coming of Elias to give warning of that day and prepare the way of the Lord. I am very willing to admit that Elias will come according to the sence of the Prophet Malachi but he will not come with observation no more than he did in the Person of Iohn the Baptist He will not bear the name of Elias nor tell us he is the Man that went to Heaven in a fiery Chariot and is now come down again to give us warning of the last Fire But some divine person may appear before the second coming of our Saviour as there did before his first coming and by giving a new light and life to the Christian Doctrine may dissipate the mists of error and abolish all those little controversies amongst good men and the divisions and animosities that spring from them enlarging their Spirits by greater discoveries and uniting them all in the bonds of love and charity and in the common study of truth and perfection Such an Elias the Prophet seems to point at And may be come and be the great Peace-maker and preparer of the ways of the Lord. But at present we cannot from this Sign make any judgment when the World will end Another Sign preceeding the end of the World is The Conversion of the Iews and this is a wonderful sign indeed S. Paul seems expresly to affirm it Rom. 11. 25 26. But it is differently understood either of their Conversion only or of their Restoration to their own Countrey Liberties and Dominion The Prophets bear hard upon this sence sometimes as you may see in Isaiah Ezekiel Hosea Amos. And to the same purpose the ancient promise of Moses is interpreted Deut. 30. Yet this seems to be a thing very unconceivable unless we suppose the Ten Tribes to be still in some hidden corner of the World from whence they may be conducted again into their own Countrey as once out of Egypt by a miraculous Providence and establish'd there Which being known will give the alarum to all the other Iews in the World and make an universal confluence to their old home Then our Saviour by an extraordinary appearance to them as once to S. Paul and by Prophets
regenerate and rise into a Spiritual Life 'T is said here The rest of the Dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished That implyes that at the end of these thousand years the rest of the dead did live again which according to the Allegory must be that after a thousand years all the wicked will be regenerate and rais'd into a Spiritual Life These absurdities arise upon an allegorical exposition of this Resurrection if apply'd to single Persons But Dr. Hammond a Learned and worthy Divine but one that loves to contract and cramp the sence of Prophecies making this First Resurrection allegorical applies it not to single Persons but to the state of the Church in general The Christian Church he says shall have a Resurrection for a thousand years that is shall rise out of Persecution be in a prosperous condition and an undisturb'd profession of the true Religion for so long a time But this agrees with the Prophecy as little as the former If it be a state of the Church in general and of the Church then in being why is this Resurrection apply'd to the Martyrs Why are they said to rise seeing the state they liv'd in was a troublesome state of the Church and it would be no happiness to have that reviv'd again Then as to the Time of this Resurrection of the Church where will you fix it The Prophet Daniel places this Reign of Christ at or after the dissolution of the fourth Monarchy and S. Iohn places it a thousand years before the last Day of Judgment How will you adjust the Allegorical Resurrection of the Church to these limits Or if in point of time you was free as to Prophecy yet how would you adjust it to History Where will you take these thousand years of happiness and prosperity to the Church These Authors suppose them past and therefore must begin them either from the first times of the Gospel or from the time of Constantine Under the first Ages of the Gospel were you know the great Persecutions by the Heathen Emperours Could those be call'd the Reign of Christ and of His Saints Was Sathan then bound or was this Epoclâ—a but a thousand years before the Day of Judgment And if you begin this Resurrection of the Church from the days of Constantine when the Empire became Christian how will you reckon a thousand years from that time for the continuance of the Church in peace and purity for the reign of Christ and of his Saints must necessarily imply both those Characters Besides who are the rest of the Dead that liv'd after the expiration of those thousand years if they begun at Constantine And why is not the Second Resurrection and the Day of Judgment yet come Lastly You ought to be tender of interpreting the First Resurrection in an Allegorical sence left you expose the second Resurrection to be made an allegory also To conclude The words of the Text are plain and express for a literal Resurrection as to the First as well as the Second and there is no Allegorical interpretation that I know of that will hold through all the particulars of the Text consistently with it self and with History And when we shall have prov'd this future Kingdom of Christ from other places of the Apocalypse and of Holy Writ you will the more easily admit the literal sence of this place Which you know according to the receiv'd rule of Interpreters is never to be quitted or forsaken without necessity But when I speak of confirming this Doctrine from other passages of Scripture I do not mean as to that definite time of a thousand years for that is no where else mention'd in the Apocalypse or in Scripture that I know of and seems to be mention'd here in this close of all things to mind us of that type that was propos'd in the beginning of all things Of Six days and a Sabbath Whereof each Day Comprehends a thousand years and the Sabbath which is the Millennial state hath its thousand According to the known Prophecy of Elias which as I told you before was not only receiv'd amongst the Iews but also own'd by very many of the Christian Fathers To proceed therefore to other parts of S. Iohn ' s Prophecies that set forth this Kingdom of Christ. The Vision of the Seven Trumpets is one of the most remarkable in the Apocalypse and the Seventh Trumpet which plainly reaches to the end of the World and the Resurrection of the Dead opens the Scene to the Millennium Hear the sound of it The seventh Angel sounded and there were great voices in heaven saying The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall reign for ever and â—ver And the four and twenty Elders which sat before God on their Seats fell upon their faces and worshipped God Saying We give thee thanks O Lord God Almighty which art and wast and art to come because thou hast taken to thee thy great power and hast reigned And the Nations were angry and thy wrath is come and the time of the Dead that they should be judged and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the Prophets and to the Saints and them that fear thy Name small and great and shouldest destroy them that destroy the Earth c. This is manifestly the Kingdom of Christ and with this is joyn'd the Resurrection of the Dead and the rewarding of the suffering Prophets and Saints as in the 20th Chapter This is that mystery of God that was to be finish'd in the days of the voice of the seventh Angel as is said in the 20th Chap. ver 7. As he hath declared to his servants the Prophets Namely the mystery of this Kingdom which was foretold by the Prophets of the Old Testament and more especially by Daniel as we shall see hereafter The New Ierusalem as it is set down Apoc. 21. 2 3 4 5 6 7. is another instance or image of this Kingdom of Christ. And the Palm-bearing Company Chap. 7. 9 c. are some of the Martyrs that shall enjoy it They are plainly describ'd there as Christian Martyrs ver 14. And their reward or the state of happiness they are to enjoy ver 15 16 17. is the same with that of the Inhabitants of the New Ierusalem Ch. 21. 2 3 4 c. as upon comparing those two places will easily appear Furthermore at the opening of the Seals Chap. 5. which is another principal Vision and reaches to the end of the World there is a prospect given us of this Kingdom of Christ and of that reward of his Saints For when they sing the new Song to the Lamb ver 9 10. they say Thou art worthy to take the Book and to open the Seals thereof For thou wast slain and hast redeemed us to God by thy bloud And hast made us unto our God Kings and Priests and we shall reign on the Earth
expressions carry the work a great deal further even to that full sence which we propose Besides the Prophets often speak of the melting of the Earth or of the Hills and Mountains at the presence of the Lord in the day of his wrath And S. Iohn Apoc. 15. 2. tells us of a Sea of Glass mingled with Fire where the Saints stood singing the song of Moses and triumphing over their enemies the Spiritual Pharaoh and his host that were swallowed up in it The Sea of Glass must be a Sea of molten glass it must be fluid not solid if a Sea neither can a solid substance be said to be mingled with Fire as this was And to this answers the Lake of fire and brimstone which the Beast and false Prophet were thrown into alive Apoc. 19. 20. These all refer to the end of the World and the last Fire and also plainly imply or express rather that state of Liquefaction which we suppose and assert Furthermore The Renovation of the World or The New Heavenâ— and New Earth which S. Peter out of the Prophets tells us shall spring out of these that are burnt and dissolved do suppose this Earth reduc'd into a fluid Chaos that it may lay a foundation for a second World If you take such a Skeleton of an Earth as your scorching Fire would leave behind it where the flesh is â—orn from the bones and the Rocks and Mountains stand naked and staring upon you the Sea half empty gaping at the Sun and the Cities all in ruines and in rubbish How would you raise a New World from this and a World fit to be an habitation for the Righteous for so S. Peter makes that to be which is to succeed after the Conflagration And a VVorld also without a Sea so S. Iohn describes the New Earth he saw As these characters do not agree to the present Earth so neither would they agree to your Future one for if that dead lump could revive and become habitable again it would however retain all the imperfections of the former Earth besides some scars and deformities of its own VVherefore if you would cast the Earth into a new and better mould you must first melt it down and the last Fire being as a 〈◊〉 fire will make an improvement in it both as to matter and form To conclude it must be reduc'd into a fluid Mass in the nature of a Chaos as it was at first but this last will be a Fiery Chaos as that was Watery and from this state it will emerge again into a Paradisiacal World But this being the Subject of the following Book we will discourse no more of it in this place CHAP. X. Concerning the beginning and progress of the Conflagration what part of the Earth will first be Burnt The manner of the future destruction of Rome according to Prophetical Indications The last state and consummation of the general Fire HAving remov'd the chief obstructions to our design and show'd a method for weakning the strength of Nature by draining the Trench and beating down those Bulwarks wherein she seems to place her greatest confidence we must now go to work making choice of the weakest part of Nature for our first attack where the fire may be the easiest admitted and the best maintain'd and preserv'd And for our better direction it will be of use to consider what we noted before viz. That the Conflagration is not a pure Natural Fatality but a miâ—t Fatality or a Divine Judgment supported by Natural Causes And if we can find some part of the Earth or of the Christian World that hath more of these natural dispositions to Inflammation than the rest and is also represented by Scripture as a more peculiar object of God's Judgments at the coming of our Saviour we may justly pitch upon that part of the World as first to be destroyed Nature and Providence conspiring to make that the first Sacrifice to this Fiery Vengeance Now as to Natural dispositions 〈◊〉 any Country or Region of the Earth to be set on Fire They seem to be chiefly these two Sulphureousness of the Soil and an hollow mountainous construction of the ground Where these two dispositions meet in the same tract or territory the one as to the quality of the matter and the other as to the form it stands like a Pile of fit materials ready set to have the Fire put to it And as to Divine Indications where this General Fire will 〈◊〉 the Scripture points to the Seat of Antichrist wheresoever that is for the beginning of it The Scripture I say points at this two ways First in telling us that our Saviour at his coming in flames of Fire shall consume the wicked One. The Man of sin the Son of perdition with the Spirit of his mouth and shall destroy him with the brightness of his presence Secondly under the name of Mystical Babylon which is allowed by all to be the Seat of Antichrist and by Scripture always condemn'd to the Fire This we find in plain words asserted by S. Iohn in the 18th Chap. of his Revelations and in the 19th ver 3. under the name of the Great Whore which is the same City and the same Seat according to the interpretation of Scripture it self And the Prophet Daniel when he had set the Ancient of Days upon his fiery Throne says The Body of the Beast was given to the burning flame Which I take to be the same thing with what S. Iohn says afterwards Apoc. 19. 20. The Beast and the false Prophet were cast alive into a Lake of fire burning with brimstone By these places of Scripture it seems manifest that Antichrist and the Seat of Antichrist will be consumed with Fire at the coming of our Saviour And 't is very reasonable and decorous that the Grand Traitor and Head of the Apostasie should be made the first example of the divine vengeance Thus much being allow'd from Scripture let us now return to Nature again to seek out that part of the Christian World that from its own constitution is most subject to burning by the Sulphureousness of its Soil and its fiery Mountains and Caverns This we shall easily find to be the Roman Territory or the Countrey of Italy which by all accounts ancient and modern is a store-house of fire as if it was condemn'd to that fate by God and Nature and to be an Incendiary as it were to the rest of the VVorld And seeing Mystical Babylon the Seat of Antichrist is the same Rome and its Territory as it is understood by most Interpreters of former and later Ages you see both our lines meet in this point And that there is a fairness on both hands to conclude that at the glorious appearance of our Saviour the Conflagration will begin at the City of Rome and the Roman Territory Nature hath sav'd us the pains of kindling a fire in those parts of the Earth for
Heaven with power and great glory and that will be to judge the World When the Son of Man shall come in his glory and all the holy Angels with him then shall he sit upon the Throne of his glory And before him shall be gather'd all Nations and he will separate the good from the bad and to the wicked and unbelievers he will say Depart from me ye cursed into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels This is the same Coming and the same Fire with that which we mention'd before out of S. Paul As you will plainly see if you compare S. Matthew's words with S. Paul's which are these When the Lord Iesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty Angels In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God and that hearken not to the Gospel of our Lord Iesus Christ. Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from or by the presence of the Lord and the glory of his power This me thinks should be an awakening thought that there is such a threatning upon record by one who never yet fail'd in his word against those that do not believe his Testimony Those that reject him now as a Dupe or an Impostor run a hazard of seeing him hereafter coming in the Clouds to be their Judge And it will be too late then to correct their errour when the bright Armies of Angels fill the Air and the Earth begins to melt at the Presence of the Lord. Thus much concerning those three ranks of Men whom the Apostle S. Paul seems to point at principally and condemn to the flames But as I said before the rest of sinners and vitious Persons amongst the Professors of Christianity tho' they are not so directly the Enemies of God as these are yet being transgressors of his Law they must expect to be brought to Justice In every well-govern'd State not only Traitors and Rebels that offend more immediately against the Person of the Prince but all others that notoriously violate the Laws are brought to condign punishment according to the nature and degree of their crime So in this case The fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is 'T is therefore the concern of every man to reflect often upon that Day and to consider what his fate and sentence is likely to be at that last Trial. The Iews have a Tradition that Elias sits in Heaven and keeps a Register of all Mens actions good or bad He hath his Under Secretaries for the several Nations of the World that take minutes of all that passes and so hath the History of every Man's life before him ready to be produc'd at the Day of Judgment I will not vouch for the literal truth of this but it is true in effect Every Man's fate shall be determin'd that Day according to the history of his Life according to the works done in the flesh whether good or bad And therefore it ought to have as much influence upon us as if every single action was formally register'd in Heaven If Men would learn to contemn this World it would cure a great many Vices at once And methinks S. Peter's argument from the approaching dissolution of all things should put us out of conceit with such perishing vanities Lust and Ambition are the two reigning Vices of great Men and those little fires might be soon extinguish'd if they would frequently and seriously meditate on this last and Universal Fire which will put an end to all Passions and all Contentions As to Ambition the Heathens themselves made use of this argument to abate and repress the vain affectation of glory and greatness in this World I told you before the lesson that was given to Scipio Africanus by his Uncle's Ghost upon this Subject And upon a like occasion and consideration Caesar hath a lesson given him by Lucan after the Battle of Pharsalia where Pompey lost the day and Rome its liberty The Poet says Caesar took pleasure in looking upon the dead Bodies and would not suffer them to be buried or which was their manner of burying to be burnt Whereupon he speaks to him in these words Hos Caesar populos si nunc non usserit Ignis Uret cum Terris uret cum gurgite Ponti Communis mundo superest Rogus Ossibus astra Misturus Quocunque Tuam Fortuna vocabit Hae quoque eunt Animae non altiùs ibis in auras Non meliore loco Stygiâ sub nocte jacebis Libera fortuna Mors est Capit omnia Tellus Quae genuit Coelo tegitur Qui non habet urnam Caesar If now these Bodies want their pile and urn At last with the whole Globe they 're sure to burn The World expects one general Fire and Thou Must go where these poor Sculs are wand'ring now Thou'l reach no higher in th' Ethereal Plain Nor 'mongst the Shades a better place obtain Death levels all And He that has not room To make a Grave Heaven's Vault shall be his Tomb. These are mortifying thoughts to ambitious Spirits And surely our own Mortality and the Mortality of the World it self may be enough to convince all considering Men That Vanity of Vanities all is vanity under the Sun any otherwise than as they relate to a better Life FINIS THE THEORY OF THE EARTH Containing an Account OF THE Original of the Earth AND OF ALL THE GENERAL CHANGES Which it hath already undergone OR IS TO UNDERGO Till the CONSUMMATION of all Things THE FOURTH BOOK Concerning the NEW HEAVENS and NEW EARTH AND Concerning the CONSUMMATION of all Things LONDON Printed by R. N. for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's-Head in S. Paul's Church-Yard 1697. PREFACE TO THE READER YOU see it is still my lot to travel into New Worlds having never found any great satisfaction in this As an active people leaves their habitations in a barren soil to try if they can make their fortune better elsewhere I first lookt backwards and waded through the Deluge into the Primaeval World to see how they liv'd there and how Nature stood in that original constitution Now I am going forwards to view the New Heavens and New Earth that will be after the Conflagration But Gentle Reader let me not take you any further if you be weary I do not love a querulous Companion Unless your Genius therefore press you forwards chuse rather to rest here and be content with that part of the Theory which you have seen already Is it not fair to have followed Nature so far as to have seen her twice in her ruins Why should we still pursue her even after death and dissolution into dark and remote Futurities To whom therefore such disquisitions seem needless or over-curious let them rest here and leave the remainder of this Work which is a kind of PROPHECY concerning the STATE of things after the Conflagration to those that are of a disposition suited to such studies and enquiries Not that any part of this Theory
disagrace But as we have reason to blame the partiality of those that opposed this doctrine so on the other hand we cannot excuse the Patrons of it from all indiscretions I believe they might partly themselves make it obnoxious by mixing some things with it from pretended Traditions or the Books of the Sibylls or other private Authorities that had so sufficient warrant from Scripture and things sometimes that Nature would not easily bear Besides in later ages they seem to have dropt one half of the doctrine namely the Renovation of Nature which Irenaeus Iustin Martyr and the Ancients joyn inseparably with the Millennium And by this omission the doctrine hath been made less intelligible and one part of it inconsistent with another And when their pretensions were to reign upon this present Earth and in this present state of Nature it gave a jealousie to Temporal Princes and gave occasion likewise to many of Eanatical Spirits under the notion of Saints to aspire to dominion after a violent and tumultuary manner This I reckon as one great cause that brought the doctrine into discredit But I hope by reducing of it to the true state we shall cure this and other abuses for the future Lastly It never pleas'd the Church of Rome and so far as the influence and authority of that would go you may be sure it would be deprest and discountenanc'd I never yet met with a Popish Doctor that held the Millennium and Baron us would have it pass for an Heresie and Papias for the Inventor of it whereas if Irenaeus may be credited it was receiv'd from S. Iohn and by him from the mouth of our Saviour And neither S. Ierome nor his friend Pope Damasus durst ever condemnoit for an heresie It was always indeed uneasie and gave offence to the Church of Rome because it does not suit to that Scheme of Christianity which they have drawn They suppose Christ reigns already by his Vicar the Pope and treads upon the Necks of Emperors and Kings And if they could but suppress the Northern Heresie as they call it they do not know what a Millennium would signifie or how the Church could be in an happier condition than she is The Apocalypse of St. Iohn does suppose the true Church under hardship and persecution more or less for the greatest part of the Christian Ages namely for 1260 years while the Witnesses are in Sack cloth But the Church of Rome hath been in prosperity and greatness and the commanding Church in Christendom for so long or longer and hath rul'd the Nations with a Rod of Iron so as that mark of the true Church does not favour her at all And the Millennium being properly a reward and triumph for those that come out of Persecution such as have liv'd always in pomp and prosperity can pretend to no share in it or benefit by it This has made the Church of Rome have always an ill eye upon this Doctrine because it seem'd to have an ill eye upon her And as she grew in splendor and greatness she eclips'd and obscur'd it more and more so that it would have been lost out of the World as an obsolete errour if it had not been reviv'd by some of the Reformation CHAP. VII The true state of the Millennium according to Characters taken from Scripture some mistakes concerning it examin'd WE have made sufficient proof of a Millennial state from Scripture and Antiquity and upon that firm Basis have setled our second Proposition We should now determine the Time and Place of this future Kingdom of Christ Not whether it is to be in Heaven or upon Earth for that we suppose determin'd already but whether it is to be in the present Earth and under the present constitution of Nature or in the New Heavens and New Earth which are promis'd after the Conflagration This is to make our Third Proposition and I should have proceeded immediately to the examination of it but that I imagine it will give us some light in this affair if we enquire further into the true state of the Millennium before we determine its Time and Place We have already noted some moral Characters of the Millennial state And the great Natural Character of it is this in general That it will be Paradisiacal Free from all inconveniences either of external Nature or of our own Bodies For my part I do not understand how there can be any considerable degree of happiness without Indolency nor how there can be Indolency while we have such Bodies as we have now and such an external constitution of Nature And as there must be Indolency where there is happiness so there must not be Indigency or want of any due comforts of life For where there is Indigency there is sollicitude and distraction and uneasiness and fear Passions that do as naturally disquiet the Soul as pain does the Body Therefore Indolency and Plenty seem to be two essential Ingredients of every happy state and these two in conjunction make that state we call Paradisiacal Now the Scripture seems plainly to exempt the Sons of the New Ierusalem or of the Millennium from all pain or want in those words Apoc. 21. 4. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes And there shall be no more death neither sorrow nor crying neither shall there be any more pain for the former things are passed away And the Lord of that Kingdom He that sate upon the Throne said Behold I make all things new ver 5. This Renovation is a restauration to some former state and I hope not to that state of indigency and misery and diseasedness which we languish under at present But to that pristine Paradisiacal state which was the blessing of the first Heavens and the first Earth As Health and Plenty are the Blessings of Nature so in Civil affairs Peace is the greatest blessing And this is inseparably annext to the Millennium an indelible character of the Kingdom of Christ. And by Peace we understand not onely freedom from Persecution upon religious accounts but that Nation shall not rise up against Nation upon any account whatsoever That bloody Monster War that hath devour'd so many Millions of the Sons of Adam is now at length to be chain'd up and the Furies that run throughout the Earth with their Snakes and Torches shall be thrown into the Abyss to sting and prey upon one another All evil and mischievous passions shall be extinguish'd and that not in men onely but even in Brute creatures according to the Prophets The Lamb and the Lyon shall lie down together and the sucking Child shall play with the Basilisk Happy days when not onely the Temple of Ianus shall be shut up for a thousand years and the Nations shall beat their swords into plow-shares but all enmities and antipathies shall cease all acts of hostility throughout all nature And this Universal Peace is a demonstration also of the former character Universal Plenty for where
Old Testament As to the Apocalypse Babylon the seat of Antichrist is represented there as destroy'd by Fire Chap. 18. 8 18. Chap. 14. 11. Chap. 19. 3 20. And in Daniel when the Beast is destroy'd Chap. 7. 11. His body was given to the burning flame Then as to the other Prophets they do not you know speak of Antichrist or the Beast in terms but under the Types of Babylon Tyre and such like and these places or Princes are represented by them as to be destroy'd by fire Isa. 13. 19. Ier. 51. 25. Ezek. 28. 18. So much for this third Argument The fourth Argument is this The Future Kingdom of Christ will not be till the day of Judgment and the Resurrection But that will not be till the end of the World Therefore neither the Kingdom of Christ. By the day of Judgment here I do not mean the final and universal Judgment Nor by the Resurrection the final and universal Resurrection for these will not be till after the Millennium But we understand here the first day of Judgment and the first Resurrection which will be at the end of this present World according as S. Iohn does distinguish them in the 20th Chap. of the Apocalypse Now that the Millennium will not be till the day of Judgment in this sence we have both the Testimonies of Daniel and of S. Iohn Daniel in the 7th Chap. supposes the Beast to rule till judgment shall sit and then they shall take away his dominion and it shall be given to the people of the Saints of the most High S. Iohn makes an explicite declaration of both these in his 20th Chap. of the Apocalypse which is the great Directory in this point of the Millennium He says there were Thrones set as for a Judicature Then there was a Resurrection from the Dead and those that rise reigned with Christ a Thousand years Here 's a Judicial Session a Resurrection and the reign of Christ joyned together There is also another passage in S. Iohn that joyns the judgment of the Dead with the Kingdom of Christ. 'T is in the 11th Chap. under the seventh Trumpet The words are these ver 15. And the seventh Angel sounded and there were great voices in heaven saying the kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall reign for ever and ever And the four and twenty Elders c. And the nations were angry and thy wrath is come and the time of the Dead that they should be judged and that thou shouldst give reward unto thy servants the Prophets and to the Saints and them that fear thy name Here are two things plainly express'd and link'd together The judging of the Dead and the Kingdom of Christ wherein the Prophets and Saints are rewarded Now as the judging of the Dead is not in this life so neither is the reward of the Prophets and Saints in this life as we are taught sufficiently in the Gospel and by the Apostles Mat. 19. 28. 1 Thess. 1. 7. 2 Tim. 4. 8. 1 Pet. 1. 7. and Ch. 5. 4. Therefore the Reign and Kingdom of Christ which is joyned with these two cannot be in this life or before the end of the world And as a further testimony and confirmation of this we may observe that S. Paul to Timothy hath joyn'd together these three things The appearance of Christ the Reign of Christ and the judging of the Dead I charge thee therefore before God and the Lord Iesus Christ who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his Kingdom 2 Tim. 4. 1. This might also be prov'd from the order extent and progress of the Prophecies of the Apocalypse whereof some are such as reach to the end of the World and yet must be accomplish'd before the Millennium begin as the Vials Others are so far already advanc'd towards the end of the World as to leave no room for a thousand years reign as the Trumpets But because every one hath his own interpretation of these Prophecies and it would be tedious here to prove any single Hypothesis in contradistinction to all the rest we will therefore leave this remark to have more or less effect according to the minds it falls upon And proceed to our fifth Argument Fifthly The Ierusalem-state is the same with the Millennial state But the New Ierusalem state will not be till the end of the World or till after the Conflagration Therefore neither the Millennium That the Ierusalem-state is the same with the Millennium is agreed upon I think by all Millenaries Ancient and Modern Iustin Martyr Irenaeus and Tertullian speak of it in that sence and so do the later Authors so far as I have observ'd And St. Iohn seems to give them good authority for it In the 20th Chap. of the Apocalypse he says the Camp of the Saints and the Beloved City were besieg'd by Satan and his Gigantick crew at the end of the Millennium That Beloved City is the New Ierusalem and you see it is the same with the Camp of the Saints or at least contemporary with it Besides the Marriage of the Lamb was in or at the appearance of the New Jerusalem for that was the Spouse of the Lamb Apoc. 21. 2. Now this Spouse was ready and this Marriage was said to be come at the destruction of Babylon which was the beginning of the Millennium Chap. 18. 7. Therefore the New Jerusalem run all along with the Millennium and was indeed the same thing under another name Lastly What is this New Jerusalem if it be not the same with the Millennial state It is promis'd as a reward to the sufferers for Christ Apoc. 3. 12. and you see its wonderful priviledges Ch. 21. 3 4. and yet it is not Heaven and eternal Life for it is said to come down from God out of Heaven Ch. 21. 2. and Ch. 3. 12. It can therefore be nothing but the glorious Kingdom of Christ upon Earth where the Saints shall reign with him a Thousand Years Now as to the second part of our Argument that the New Jerusalem will not come down from Heaven till the end of the World of this S. Iohn seems to give us a plain proof or demonstration for he places the New Jerusalem in the New Heavens and New Earth which cannot be till after the Conflagration Let us hear his words Apoc. 21. 1 2. And I saw a New Heaven and a New Earth for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away and there was no more sea And I Iohn saw the Holy City New Ierusalem coming down from God out of Heaven prepared as a Bride adorned for her husband When the New Earth was made he sees the New Jerusalem coming down upon it and this Renovation of the Earth not being till the Conflagration The New Jerusalem could not be till then neither The Prophet Isaiah had long before said the same thing though not in
with the Hypothesis As to the present Form of the Earth we call all Nature to witness for us The Rocks and the Mountains the Hills and the Valleys the deep and wide Sea and the Caverns of the Ground Let these speak and tell their origine How the Body of the Earth came to be thus torn and mangled If this strange and irregular structure was not the effect of a ruine and of such a ruine as was universal over the face of the whole Globe But we have given such a full explication of this in the first part of the Theory from Chapt. the 9th to the end of that Treatise that we dare stand to the judgment of any that reads those four Chapters to determine if the Hypothesis does not answer all those Phaenomena easily and adequately The next Phaenomenon to be consider'd is the Deluge with its adjuncts This also is fully explain'd by our Hypothesis in the 2d 3d. and 6th Chapters of the first Book Where it is shewn that the Mosaical Deluge that is an universal Inundation of the whole Earth above the tops of the highest Mountains made by a breaking open of the Great Abyss for thus far Moses leads us is fully explain'd by this Hypothesis and cannot be conceiv'd in any other method hitherto propos'd There are no sources or stores of Water sufficient for such an effect that may be drawn upon the Earth and drawn off again but by supposing such an Abyss and such a Disruption of it as the Theory represents Lastly As to the Phaenomena of Paradise and the Ante-diluvian World we have set them down in order in the 2d Book and apply'd to each of them its proper explication from the same Hypothesis We have also given an account of that Character which Antiquity always assign'd to the first age of the World or the Golden Age as they call'd it namely Equality of Seasons throughout the Year or a perpetual Equinox We have also taken in all the adjuncts or concomitants of these States as they are mention'd in Scripture The Longevity of the Ante-diluvians and the declension of their age by degrees after the Flood As also that wonderful Phaenomenon the Rainbow which appear'd to Noah for a Sign that the Earth should never undergo a second Deluge And we have shewn wherein the force and propriety of that Sign consisted for confirming Noah's faith in the promise and in the divine veracity Thus far we have explain'd the past Phaenomena of the Natural World The rest are Futurities which still lie hid in their Causes and we cannot properly prove a Theory from effects that are not yet in being But so far as they are foretold in Scripture both as to substance and circumstance in prosecution of the same Principles we have ante dated their birth and shew'd how they will come to pass We may therefore I think reasonably conclude That this Theory has performed its task and answer'd its title having given an account of all the general changes of the Natural World as far as either Sacred History looks backwards or Sacred Prophecy looks forwards So far as the one tells us what is past in Nature and the other what is to come And if all this be nothing but an appearance of truth 't is a kind of fatality upon us to be deceiv'd SO much for Natural Evidence from the Causes or Effects We now proceed to Scripture which will make the greatest part of this Review The Sacred Basis upon which the whole Theory stands is the doctrine of S. Peter deliver'd in his Second Epistle and Third Chapter concerning the Triple Order and Succession of the Heavens and the Earth That comprehends the whole extent of our Theory which indeed is but a large Commentary upon S. Peter's Text. The Apostle sets out a threefold state of the Heavens and Earth with some general properties of each taken from their different Constitution and different Fate The Theory takes the same threefold state of the Heavens and the Earth and explains more partâ—cularly wherein their different Constitution consists and how under the conduct of Providence their different fate depends upon it Let us set down the Apostle's words with the occasion of them and their plain sence according to the most easie and natural explication Ver. 3. Knowing this first that there shall come in the last days scoffers walking after their own lusts 4. And saying Where is the promise of his coming for since the fathers fell asleep all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation 5. For this they willingly are ignorant of that by the word of God the heavens were of old and the earth consisting of water and by water 6. Whereby the world that then was being overflowed with water perished 7. But the heavens and the earth that are now by the sâ—me word are kept in store reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men 10. The day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise and the elements shall melt with fervent heat the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burnt up 13. Nevertheless we according to his promise look for new heavens and a new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness This is the whole Discourse so far as relates to our Subject S Peter you see had met with some that scoff'd at the future destruction of the World and the coming of our Saviour and they were men it seems that pretended to Philosophy and Argument and they use this argument for their opinion Seeing there hath been no change in Nature or in the World from the beginning to this time why should we think there will be any change for the future The Apostle answers to this That they willingly forget or are ignorant that there were Heavens of old and an Earth so and so constituted consisting of Water and by Water by reason whereof that World or those Heavens and that Earth perish'd in a Deluge of Water But saith he the Heavens and the Earth that are now are of another constitution fitted and reserved to another fate namely to perish by Fire And after these are perish'd there will be New Heavens and a New Earth according to God's promise This is an easie Paraphrase and the plain and genuine sence of the Apostle's discourse and no body I think would ever look after any other sence if this did not carry them out of their usual road and point to conclusions which they did not fancy This sence you see hits the objections directly or the Cavil which these scoffers made and tells them that they vainly pretend that there hath been no change in the World since the beginning for there was one sort of Heavens and Earth before the Flood and another sort now the first having been destroy'd at the Deluge So that the Apostle's argument stands upon this Foundation That there
am bound to make good I said at first that our Hypothesis concerning the Deluge was more agreeable not only to Scripture in general but also to the particular History of the Flood left us by Moses I say more agreeable to it than any other Hypothesis that hath yet been propos'd This may be made good in a few words For in Moses's History of the Deluge there are two principal points The extent of the Deluge and the Causes of it and in both these we do fully agree with that sacred Author As to the extent of it He makes the Deluge universal All the high hills under the whole heaven were cover'd fifteen cubits upwards We also make it universal over the face of the whole Earth and in such a manner as must needs raise the waters above the top of the highest Hills every where As to the canses of it Moses makes them to be the disruption of the Abyss and the Rains and no more and in this also we exactly agree with him we know no other causes nor pretend to any other but those two Distinguishing therefore Moses his narration as to the substance and circumstances of it it must be allowed that these two points make the substance of it and that an Hypothesis that differs from it in either of these two differs from it more than Ours which at the worst can but differ in matter of circumstance Now seeing the great difficulty about the Deluge is the quantity of Water required for it there have been two explications proposed besides ours to remove or satisfie this difficulty One whereof makes the Deluge not to have been universal or to have reacht only Iudea and some neighbouring Countries and therefore less water would suffice The other owning the Deluge to be universal supplies it self with Water from the Divine Omnipotenty and says new Waters were created then for the nonce and again annihilated when the Deluge was to cease Both these explications you see and I know no more of note that are not obnoxious to the same exceptions differ from Moses in the substance or in one of the two substantial points and consequently more than ours doth The first changeth the Flood into a kind of national inundation and the second assigns other causes of it than Moses had assigned And as they both differ apparently from the Mosaical History so you may see them refuted upon other grounds also in the third Chapter of the First Book of the Theory This may be sufficient as to the History of the Flood by Moses But possibly it may be said the principal objection will arise from Moses his Six-days Creation in the first Chapter of Genesis where another sort of Earth than what we have form'd from the Chaos is represented to us namely a Terraqueous Globe such as our Earth is at present 'T is indeed very apparent that Moses hath accommodated his Six days Creation to the present form of the Earth or to that which was before the eyes of the people when he writ But it is a great question whether that was ever intended for a true Physical account of the origine of the Earth or whether Moses did either Philosophize or Astronomize in that description The ancient Fathers when they answer the Heathens and the adversaries of Christianity do generally deny it as I am ready to make good upon another occasion And the thing it self bears in it evident marks of an accommodation and condescention to the vulgar notions concerning the form of the World Those that think otherwise and would make it literally and physically true in all the parts of it I desire them without entring upon the strict merits of the cause to determine these Preliminaries First whether the whole universe rise from a Terrestrial Chaos Secondly what Systeme of the World this Six-days Creation proceeds upon whether it supposes the Earth or the Sun for the Center Thirdly Whether the Sun and Fixt Stars are of a later date and a later birth than this Globe of Earth And lastly Where is the Region of the Super-celestial Waters When they have determin'd these Fundamentals we will proceed to other observations upon the Six-days work which will further assure us that 't is a narration suited to the capacity of the people and not to the strict and physical nature of things Besides we are to remember that Moses must be so interpreted in the first Chapter of Genesis as not to interfere with himself in other parts of his History nor to interfere with S. Peter or the Prophet David or any other Sacred Authors when they treat of the same matter Nor lastly so as to be repugnant to clear and uncontested Science For in things that concern the natural World that must always be consulted With these precautions let them try if they can reduce that narrative of the Origine of the World to physical truth so as to be consistent both with Nature and with Divine Revelation every where It is easily reconcileable to both if we suppose it writ in a Vulgar style and to the conceptions of the People And we cannot deny that a Vulgar style is often made use of in the holy Writings How freely and unconcernedly does Scripture speak of God Almighty according to the opinions of the vulgar of his passions local motions parts and members of his body Which all are things that do not belong or are not compatible with the Divine Nature according to truth and Science And if this liberty be taken as to God himself much more may it be taken as to his works And accordingly we see what motion the Scripture gives to the Sun what figure to the Earth what figure to the Heavens All according to the appearance of sence and popular credulity without any remorse for having transgressed the rules of intellectual truth This vulgar style of Scripture in describing the natures of things hath been often mistaken for the real sence and so become a stumbling-block in the way of truth Thus the Anthropomorphites of old contended for the humane shape of God from the Letter of Scripture and brought many express Texts for their purpose but sound reason at length got the upper hand of Literal authority Then several of the Christian Fathers contended that there were no Antipodes and made that doctrine irreconcileable to Scripture But this also after a while went off and yielded to reason and experience Then the Motion of the Earth must by no means be allow'd as being contrary to Scripture for so it is indeed according to the Letter and Vulgar style But all intelligent Persons see thorough this Argument and depend upon it no more in this case than in the former Lastly The original of the Earth from a Chaos drawn according to the rules of Physiology will not be admitted because it does not agree with the Scheme of the six-Six-days Creation But why may not this be writ in a Vulgar style as well as the rest Certainly
there can be nothing more like a Vulgar style than to set God to work by the day and in Six-days to finish his task as he is there represented We may therefore probably hope that all these disguises of truth will at length fall off and that we shall see God and his Works in a pure and naked Light Thus I have finish'd what I had to say in confirmation of this Theory from Scripture I mean of the former part of it which depends chiefly upon the Deluge and the Ante-diluvian Earth When you have collated the places of Scripture on either side and laid them in the balance to be weigh'd one against another If you do but find them equal or near to an equal poise you know in whether Scale the Natural Reasons are to be laid and of what weight they ought to be in an argument of this kind There is a great difference betwixt Scripture with Philosophy on its side and Scripture with Philosophy against it when the question is concerning the Natural World And this is our Case which I leave now to the consideration of the unprejudic'd Reader and proceed to the Proof of the Second Part of the Theory THE later Part consists of the Conflagration of the World and the New Heavens and New Earth And seeing there is no dispute concerning the former of these two our task will now lie in a little compass Being only this To prove that there will be New Heavens and a New Earth after the Conflagration This to my mind is sufficiently done already in the first second and third Chapters of the 4th Book both from Scripture and Antiquity whether Sacred or Prophane and therefore at present we will only make a short and easie review of Scripture-Testimonies with design chiefly to obviate and disappoint the Evasions of such as would beat down solid Texts into thin Metaphors and Allegories The Testimonies Scripture concerning the Renovation of the World are either express â—implicit Those I call express that mention the New Heavens and â—ew Earth And those implicit that signifie the same thing but râ—â— express terms So when our Saviour speaks of a Palingenesia 〈◊〉 Regeneration Matt. 19. 28 29. Or S. Peter of an Apocatastasâ— or Restitution Act. 3. 21. These being words us'd by all Authâ—rs Prophane or Ecclesiastical for the Renovation of the World â—â—ght in reason to be interpreted in the same sence in the Holy Wâ—â—tings And in like manner when S. Paul speaks of his Future Eaâ—â—h or an habitable World to come Hebr. 2. 5. or of a Redemption or â—â—lioration of the present state of Nature Rom. 8. 21 22. These lead 〈◊〉 again in other terms to the same Renovation of the World â—â—t there are also some places of Scripture that set the Heavensâ—â—d â—â—d New Earth in such a full and open view that we must shut ourâ—â—yes not to see them S. Iohn says he saw them and observ'd the fâ—â—m of the New Earth Apoc. 21. 1. The Seer Isaiah spoke of thenâ— in express words many hundred years before And S. Peter marâ—â— the time when they are to be introduc'd namely after the Coâ—â—lagration or after the Dissolution of the present Heavens and Eaâ—â—h 2 Pet. 3. 12 13. These latâ—â—r Texts of Scripture being so express there is but one way left to â—â—lude the force of them and that is by turning the Renovation 〈◊〉 the World into an Allegory and making the New Heavens and â—ew Earth to be Allegorical Heavens and Earth not real and mateâ—â—al as ours are This is a bold attempt of some modern Authors â—ho chuse rather to strain the Word of God than their own Noâ—â—ons There are Allegories no doubt in Scripture but we are not 〈◊〉 allegorize Scripture without some warrant either from an Apoâ—olical Interpretation or from the necessity of the matter and I dâ— not know how they can pretend to either of these in this case â—owever That they may have all fair play we will lay aside at presâ—nt all the other Texts of Scripture and confine our selves wholly to S. Peter's words to see and examine whether they are or can â—e turn'd into an Allegory according to the best rules of Interpreâ—ation S. â—eter's words are these Seeing then all these things shall be dissolv'd what manner of persons ought ye to be in holy conversation and godliâ—â—ss Looking for and hasting the coming of the Day of God wherâ—in the Heavens being on fire shall be dissolv'd and the Elements shall melt with servent heat NEVERTHELESS we according 〈◊〉 his promise look for New Heavens and a New Earth wherein Rigâ—â—eousness shall dwell The Question is concerning this last Verse Wheâ—her the New Heavens and Earth here promis'd are to be real and maâ—â—rial Heavens and Earth or only figurative and allegorical The woâ—ds you see are clear and the general rule of Interpretation is thiâ— That we are not to recede from the letter or the literal sence unâ—ess there be a necessity from the subject matter such a necessity as makes a literal Interpretation absurd But where is that necessity in this Case Cannot God make New Heavens and a New Earth as â—easily as he made the Old ones Is his strength decay'd since that Time or is Matter grown more disobedient 〈◊〉 does not Nature offer her self voluntarily to raise a New Worâ—â— from the Second Chaos as well as from the First and under thâ— conduct of Providence to make it as convenient an habitation as 〈◊〉 Primaeval Earth Therefore no necessity can be pretended of leavinâ— the literal sence upon an incapacity of the subject matter The Second Rule to determine an Interpretatioâ— to be Literal or Allegorical is The use of the same words or phraâ—â— in the Context and the signification of them there Let 's then exaâ—ine our case according to this rule S. Peter had us'd the same pâ—ase of Heavens and Earth twice before in the same Chapter The 〈◊〉 Heavens and Earth ver 5. The Present Heavens and Earth ver 7. and now he uses it again ver 13. The New Heavens and Earth Have we not then reason to suppose that he takes it here in the sâ—me sence that he had done twice before for real and material Heaâ—â—ns and Earth There is no mark set of a new signification nor whâ— we should alter the sence of the words That he us'd them alwâ—ys before for the material Heavens and Earth I think none will â—uestion and therefore unless they can give us a sufficient reason wâ—y we should change the signification of the words we are bound 〈◊〉 this second rule also to understand them in a literal sence Lastly The very form of the Words and the manneâ— of their dependance upon the Context leads us to a literal sence â—nd to material Heavens and Earth NEVERTHELESS says â—he Apostle we expect New Heavens c. Why Nevertheless that is noâ—â—ithstanding the dissolution of the present Heavens and Earth Tâ—e Apostle foresaw what he had