Part. Fol. 584. saith And here is to be observed how the Statute of 35. E. 1. hath been dealt with since the 17th of E. 3. for in an Act that Year a branch of the Statute of 35. E. 1. was recited That forbad any thing should be attempted or brought into the Realm which should tend to blemish the King's Prerogative or in prejudice of his Lords and Commons which is now wholy omitted and Fol. 585. he saith Note in the Roll of Parliament of the Statute of 38. E. 3. Cap. 1. of Provisors there are more sharp and biting words against the Pope then in Print a Mystery often in use but not to be known of all men from which examples it is manifest that this came by the Fraud of the Bishops who before Printing were Masters of the Authentick Copies of the Laws appointed for promulgation and since Printing are Masters of the Press to interdict and publish what they will Accipe nunc horum insidias Crimine ab uno Disce omnes These few Frauds are discover'd in Print against the Interdictors of Printers which discovery they would likewise have interdicted if they had been able for these latter Books of my Lord Coke were prohibited to be Printed and got out in the late time of Troubles but by these it is clear which were only spoken obiter and without any inquisition after them that all they are guilty of are not discover'd and that to give either Spiritual or Temporal Judges Power to interdict the Press is to give them Power to have what Law what Gospel what Text what Translation what Canonical what Apocryphal what Scripture what Act of Parliament what Common Law what Statute what Religion what Justice what Liberty and what Slavery they please Besides which Power of Fraud and Forgery destructive to all Truth these further mischeifs follow all interdictions of the Press but I shall first answer such Objections as are made against the Liberty of it Object 1 First If Liberty of the Press should be permitted Enemies would have it equal with Friends Papists with Protestants Hereticks with Orthodox Secondly They would Print Blasphemy Idolatry Treason Rebellion Vncleanness Calumny Reviling Derision and all manner of Heresie Answ 1 To the First is answer'd 1. That it is impossible to exclude Enemies and Papists from Printing they being possess'd of so many Transmarine Presses whence they can with far greater advantage vent their matters then from any Presses in England 2. Admit they could be excluded yet in prudence they ought not but are more necessary to be admitted then Friends for those whom we use to call Friends are pessimum inimicorum genus Adulantes the worst kind of Enemies Flatterers who flatter and sooth us up in our Vices and destroy us but any truth of our Faults we shall never hear but from Enemies Plutarch therefore calls an Enemy a School-Master which costs us nothing 2. As to the matters of Blasphemy Idolatry or Uncleanness neither Enemy or Friend will so far dishonour themselves or their Cause as to Print them openly for it is against their interest As to Treason or Rebellion who that hath an Enemy doth not desire to know before-hand wherein the strength of his Cause as well as of his Forces lies and to have the War Proclaimed in Print before it begin that he may the better provide against Besides if there were but a Law made that nothing shall be printed without the names of the Author and Printer with their Additions and Designations And that all Crimes against the publick committed by Printing should be punished by Indictment according to Law and all injuries to private persons should be reparable by the parties injured on their Actions according to Damage Who would dare make himself guilty of a publick Crime or private Injury in Print to which he had set his name 3. As to matters of Heresie such as by accident become dangerous to public safety the prudence of the Legislators may where they find cause prohibit them both Press and Pulpit but not in the Thoughts and Consciences of Men As in the end of the Wars of Germany between the Lutherans and Catholicks it was Enacted mutually on both sides on pain of death That no Catholick should Preach against the Lutheran Doctrine or Lutheran against the Catholick but both should enjoy the liberty of their own Consciences to themselves This agreement was here made otherwise those bloody Wars would never have ended without a total destruction of one of the Parties And likewise such a Law were here much more necessary between dissentient Protestants who were Brethren then it was between the Lutherans and Catholicks who were mortal Enemies That no dissentient Protestant should Print or Preach publickly on any point of Ceremonial dissentiency or other matter not necessary to Salvation except in such matters as are particularly allowed by Supream Authority to exclude Popery there being Field-room enough in the Moral Law of God to exercise gifts in Preaching and matters which have the promise of this life and of that to come and no cause for any to complain who have liberty likewise of Conscience to use what Protestant Ceremonies and Form of Worship they will to themselves though they have not power to compel the Consciences of others who are dissentients But if Protestants are tolerated to Print or Preach against one another this is the thing the Papist would have and knows will in the end make them both a prey to himself But though Protestants ought not to preach one against another yet the juncture of Affairs being not at present in great Britain as before mention'd in Germany and an appearance of War Plotted by the Papist rather to begin than end with the Protestant the Bishops ought not to be suffer'd to interdict either Press or Pulpit to the Protestants against them To come at length to the further mischiefs insuing the Interdiction of the Press any Interdiction of the Press except in Cases before mention'd either to Friend or Enemy is a dishonour to the Protestant Religion as if it dared not suffer it self to be disputed or to meet an Enemy in the open field whereas in truth it is not Protestancy but Episcopacy 'T is not the Moral Law which is the Protestant Law but the Ceremonial which is the Popish Law which dares not encounter the shock of an Enemy And 't is Fiction and not Truth Vice and not Vertue which fears either Press or Pasquil 2. The Foreign Presses being impossible to be interdicted to the Papist if the English are interdicted to the Protestant he is thereby silenced and prohibited to answer the Papist let him preach what he pleaseth 3. By Interdiction the profit of the English Protestant Print-houses will be transported to Foreign Papists which will be a great discouragement to so necessary a Trade in England and prejudice to the Protestant Religion and Policy 4. The Interdiction of the Press will multiply the greater evil
his Presentation and Exacts so great a Sum for it as brings him in Debt as long as he Lives which makes him rather Prey on the Flock then Pray for it and to be in perpetual Contention rather than Peace 3. Admit the Parish should happen to be all Poor and the Patron by Depopulation Impropriation Inclosure of Commons and other Oppression Gets all and Pays all yet it is just the Parish should Elect their Minister and not he for Christ sends it as Glad Tidings to John Matth. 11.5 The Poor have the Gospel Preached to them and saith nothing of the Rich Christ pronounceth all his Blessings on the Poor Luke 6.20 Blessed be ye Poor for yours is the Kingdom of God Blessed are ye that hunger now for ye shall be filled Blessed are ye that weep now for ye shall laugh And James 2.5 Hath not God chosen the Poor of this World Rich in Faith and Heirs of the Kingdom which he hath promised them that love him Dan. 4.27 Wherefore O King let my Counsel be acceptable unto thee and break off thy sins by Righteousness and thine Iniquities by shewing Mercy to the Poor Prov. 29.14 The King that faithfully Judgeth the Poor his Throne shall be Established for ever 2 Cor. 9.9 He hath given to the Poor his Righteousness remaineth for ever And Matth. 19.21 Give to the Poor and thou shalt have Treasure in Heaven But Christ never pronounceth to the Rich any thing but great Dangers and Woes Matth. 19.23 Then said Jesus unto his Disciples Verily I say unto you that a Rich man shall hardly enter into the Kingdom of Heaven And again I say unto you It is easier for a Camel to go through the Eye of a Needle than for a Rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God Luke 6.24 Woe unto you that are Rich for ye have received your Consolation Woe unto you that are full for ye shall hunger Woe unto you that laugh now for ye shall mourn and weep Isa 5.8 Woe unto them that join House to House and Field to Field And James 5.1 Go to now ye Rich men Weep and Howl for your Miseries that shall come upon you Your Riches are corrupted and your Garments moth-eaten Your Gold and Silver is cankred and the rust of them shall be against you and shall eat your Flesh as it were Fire Now if the Rich should chose the Chaplain for the Poor he would be apt to Preach contrary to Christ totally in favour of the Rich and not reprove but animate them in their oppressions of the Poor which is too notorious in the Chaplains both of Ecclesiastical and Lay-Patrons wherefore if Patrons have more than their single Votes in Election of the Minister the poor Parishioners may expect such Law as is mention'd James 2.6 Do not Rich men oppress you and draw you before the Judgment-Seats But they shall never have such Gospel as Christ Preach'd and appointed to be Preached to the Poor nor such Law as he denounced against the Rich. 4. The Chaplain in his Prayer before Sermon tells God so many Lies to his Face in commendation of his Patron that surely it must be a meer Mockery of him for he calls him his Grace his Excellency Right Honourable Right Worshipful Pious Virtuous and his Very Good Lord and Patron when sometimes he is a Person of the most Vile Unworthy Sordid and Wicked Conditions on the Earth 5. He gives him more Magnificent Appellations than to God himself for though he ingeminate many times in his Prayer Good Lord and Good Lord yet he never calls God my Very Good Lord but reserves that Superlative Title for his Patron the meanest degree of which greatest Divine Attribute of Good Christ himself to be an Example of Humility refused Luke 18.19 Why callest thou me Good there is none Good but one that is God 6. If the Patron is so Very Good Pious and Virtuous as the Chaplain makes him he were more proper to ascend the Pulpit and pray for his Chaplain who many times proves none of the best either in Doctrine or Manners but was only one who came first and gave most for the Place he hath 7. He is rather an Herald hired to proclaim every Sunday in the Year his Patron 's empty Titles than a Messenger of God to Preach on his Divine Attributes 8. By these Parasitical Prayers the Patron is puft up in such Pride and Folly that he grows like the profane Lord mention'd by Cambden who said He never needed to Pray for himself he had so many Priests to Pray for him and the Patron and Patroness are so fop'd with overmuch Flattery that they seldom grow wise again as long as they live to discover those Faults wherein the Priest leads them and himself blinded to Destruction and unto the Woe pronounced to them Isa 5.20 That call Evil Good and Good Evil that put Darkness for Light and Light for Darkness that put Bitter for Sweet and Sweet for Bitter 9. As is before mention'd amongst the Primitive Christians the Election of the Minister was always by the Parochial Congregations till Anti-Christ who began to work very early deprived them of this liberty of Elections by Endowments and Patronages the Patrons of which by this Imposing such Patriarchs Bishops or Presbyters as they hired and corrupted for their Turn and depriving the Cities and Congregations of the Free Election of their Pastor destroyed the Purity of Primitive Christianity The loss of Election of their own Ministers destroyed the Primitive Christians 10. The restoring again the Election of their own Minister to Parochial Congregations and liberty of secret Suffrages would First destroy all Popery for Popery cannot be without Patronages and the Pope as the Apex of his Supremacy claims to be Supreme Patron of all Catholick Churches Secondly This would prevent all Imposing of Church-Papists to be Ministers to Protestant-Parishes Thirdly This would prevent all kind of Symony either to the Bishop for Ordination or Patron for Presentation which is impossible to be otherwise prevented and such Parochial Election is therefore better both for the Minister and the Parish No Patronages in the Ottoman Empire and the Grand Seignior may in this rise in Judgment against Christians who allows no Patronages to Parochial Cures in his Dominions but gives Liberty to every Parish to choose their own Priest to whom he himself pays some small Salarie out of the Publick Treasury Liberty of Conscience given Papists secures Liberty of Conscience to Protestants The Test of Oaths and Sacrament falls only on the Protestant and not on the Papist he hath Offices in Trustee's names Liberty and Propriety given Papists secure the Liberty and Propriety of Protestants The Compulsion of Papists to Confession of Faith or any External Form or Ceremonies of Worship against their Conscience by Penalties cannot be done without bringing the Conscience of the Protestant into the same danger with the Conscience of the Papist for if
Moral Law of God of Truth and Equity neither if these Writs were Formed according to the Truth and Equity of the Moral Law of God is it possible a sufficient number should be Formed for Writs are finite and Cases of Equity infinite and not to be put in Writs or written except by God in the Fleshly Tables of the Heart and in the Spiritual Tables of the Soul it self and Conscience It will be asked How could they subsist before H. 6. without a Sub paena and Equity from a Chancellour seeing the Common Law Writs could not supply it and what expedient is there now how Equity may be supplied To which I answer That Equity was then supplied by the Writ of Right and Justicies the Titles of both which Writs signifie Equity and likewise other Writs and the General Issues Formed on them of the Meer Right Not Guilty Null Tort Null dissersint Nihil debet guided the Jury to find according to Right and Equity by the Moral Law of God and not the Ceremonial Law of Man till the Judges to wrest the Power belonging to Jurors into their own hands brought in the Tender of the Demy mark to turn the Issue of meer Right into a Possessary Issue and instead of Truth brought in the Pictions of Colours destroyed the Justicies by Writs of Remover gave way to false Laying of Counties in Transitory Actions changed Venues granted new Trials abated Declarations for Variance from the Bond and not Sueing for what was paid as well as for what was not granting Arrests of Judgment after Verdict and not permitting to demur first to the Law and after to plead to the Fact before Verdict prohibited on the Issue Not Guilty matters of Justification to be given in Evidence admitted Demurs to Evidence admitted special Verdicts caused Juries to be of an even and not of an odd number and the Verdict not to be according to the Plurality of Votes and many other ways they had to weary Juries from giving a Verdict according to Conscience and Equity or when they had so given it to same I conclude therefore to compell men to Commence Suites by Writs in the present Age is to condemn them without Hearing of the Equity and Merits of their Cause and to compell them to revive again those Ancient Writs and trie Equity by Juries hath many great inconveniences before mention'd to be incident to all Writs especially such as are Antiquated and not understood but all these mischiefs are salved by Commencing Suites by a Copy of the Declaration Sworn in stead of a Writ which cannot be Sworn and a Judg Commissionated with Jurisdiction of Fact Law and Equity under Appeal which single Judg in a Court by himself sitting without Vacation as a Chancellour hath Power to do will no doubt be able to dispatch more Causes without troubling any Writs Juries or Councel at the Bar and more justly and under Account in one Year then 't is possible for any Chancellour with Plurality of Offices or Court with Plurality of Judges Juries and Councel at the Bar to do in Seven 6. Men are condemned before Hearing on the Capias Vtlagatum and Excommunicato Capiendo A Satyr on a Papist and a Protestant Imprison'd one on an Outlawry the other on an Excommunicato Capiendo against Imprisonment before Hearing A Papist and a Protestant Who used when they met to Rant About the Altar and the Rail Were both together Clapt in Gaol The first was catch'd by an Outlawry The last whose Conscience did vary From Bishops and their Common Prayer As Felon or a false Betrayer Was therefore Excommunicate And put to beg within a Grate Pap. Brother then quoth the Papist sad Are Protestants too grown so mad To have an Inquisition here Who thus can though no cause appear Forfeit our Goods and Selves at will In Prisons cold to starve and kill Before they Hear us doest not know Amongst our selves it is not so Who by Experience wiser grown Will Inquisition now have none Witness the Rich Venetian And wary Dutch who late began For Liberty against such Lords And Swisse with their two handed Swords For this Proud Aragon Rebell d And Naples Silk-men hardly quell'd And many more abhor'd such Tricks Yet are they all good Catholicks So Holland justly now prevents Imprisonment of Innocents And makes to help the Poor opprest Before a Judgment no Arrest Is this the Charta and of Right Petition for which you fight That every ' Torney and his Clerk Who use to live upon the shark Forge all the Outlawries they please Remedies worse than the Disease And that Poor men may be betray'd First Forge the County where 't is laid They Forge and Antedate the Writs Of Parchment cut in little Bits Then next they Forge the Sheriffs name And Forge Returns upon the same They Proclamations Forge and Feign And Exigends next without pain And all this Knavery you may spie Page Sixth of the Academy Which is their Mother and their Nurse Teachers to Forge and Steal of course Such Clerks deserve hanged to be As Nicholas Clerks upon a Tree And thus though made them to prevent They fool all Acts of Parliament For no Averment must deny The Shrieve or Clerk although they lie Is this the Liberty so proud You use to cry it up aloud And Property you so much Vant That every Papist it doth want What Purgatory can you tell Is worse than this on Earth your Hell Or what Hell is there more worth fearing Than Your Damnation without Hearing He neither shews me Time or Place Nor Witnesses brought Face to Face My Goods are all Confiscated My very Wives and Children's Bed The Bailies Seised without account Of Price to what they did amount Or Witness Writings Boxes Chest And Money too on a Suggest And Lies and Fictions in worse case I am than Felons in this Place Their Goods although the Law is strict Not Forfeit are until Convict But left to feed them Oh the blest Justice is shewn to men distrest By Protestants who only you Say have the Religion true But Christ says Know them by their Works Which shews you worse than Jews or Turks I have not left a Bit of Bread Witness these unfeign'd Tears I shed The Plaintiff asks of me a Sum As at the Dreadful Day of Doom I answer shall and God doth know I do not him a Farthing ow Yet can I not although I try Be brought to answer or deny His Forged Stuff or see the Face Of Judg or Jury on the Place But here to perish am designed And to this Dungeon confined Unless I give what e're he 'l ask This is my miserable Task I think you now turn Witches too The Rogues the mischief who did do To bring me here sure had a Spell What Language 't was I cannot tell 'T was written in a little scrow Half-words and dash't that none might know Or ratâ—er scratch'd it was in Soot With Devils Claw or Cloven Foot Prot.
both were so much concern'd and others for their own private Ambition if therefore Parliaments themselves have not or shall not sufficiently clear Ambiguities and Doubts to answer so many pretences How can it be expected that Ignorant people can clear the same upon their Oath or Conscience 3. It is permitted to Grand Juries when it doth not appear to them whether the Bill is true or false to find an Ignoramus and where the people are totally Ignorant both of the Fact and Law of Supremacy why ought they not to be allowed the same Equity according to the Truth to Answer Ignoramus 4. It is against the known Maxim That Only matters of Fact can be Testified by Witnesses and matters of Law or Right cannot be Testified but by the Law it self 8. An Usurper or Idolater may happâ—n to get the Possession of the Crown How then can a Protestant Swear to the Right of the first in Temporals or of the second in Spirituals 9. It doth not appear how a Protestant may Swear That no Foreign Prince or Person ought to have any Power Authority or Preheminence Ecclesiastical within this Realm and that he doth renounce all Foreign Power in regard it may so happen that a Protestant-Prince hath or may be born beyond Sea and be a Foreign Person and yet on failure of a Lineal Heir may happen to be the next right Heir to a Protestant King after his Decease it may seem therefore to cross Gods Providence to Swear to Renounce or Abjure all Foreign Protestant-Power as to the Succession for the Oath puts no distinction between Protestant and Papal Power but Renounces all alike if they are Foreign Persons Of the Mischiefs which ensue a false Test between Protestant and Papist 1. By the same Power is given to the Favourers of Popery to turn the Edg of all the Penal Statutes made and intended against Papists to destroy the Protestants and the Preteritions and Pardons intended the Protestants are wholly apply'd in favour of the Papist the Plagues designed against the Aegyptians are wholly let loose on the Israelites and the Passeover to which were invited the Israelites is made only a Feast for the Papist So did Bishop Bancrost in the time of Queen Elizabeth persecute all Anti-Papist-Protestants under the name of Puritans and Protected all Dominican Priests Seminaries and Papists under pretence of Opposing the Jesuits by pressing the false Tests of Recusancy to Pray in a Temple to Pray after the Common Form to Receive the Sacrament after the Common Form to take the Oath of Supremacy to use all Episcopal Ceremonies in the Worship of God and the utmost Rigor and Penalties of such Recusancy against the Anti-Papist Protestant who hath been the only Counterpoise against the Papist that he hath not over run the Land and giving Protection to Papists against the very same Tests and Penal Laws so furiously Prosecuted against the Anti-Papist Protestant So did the subtle Gundamore give a new Whet to the High-Commission-Court and turn'd the Edg of the same Originally intended against the Papists to be against the Anti-Papist Protestant And since Bishops have been discharged of that Commission yet the same Course of Bancrofts and Gundamores hath been still continued against the Anti-Papist-Protestants as then under the name of Puritans so since under the name of Fanaticks such Protestants have had the Penalties of Recusancy laid on them when Papists have Compounded for Trifles or been absolutely Pardon'd such Protestants have had the Oath of Supremacy forced on them against their Conscience when Papists have neither had Supremacy nor Allegiance required of them nor their Consciences troubled but have remained absolutely unsworn from so much as any Oath of Fidelity unless to Foreign Princes such Protestants have had their Houses utterly Disarmed and not so much left as sufficient to keep out a Thief when Papists have had their Houses full of Arms and not so much as searched such Protestant's Children have been by the Usurped Power of Bishops Certificates made Bastards because not Married with the Ceremonies of the Book of Common Prayer and this they have done by pretence of the Canon of the Council of Trent a Foreign Jurisdiction long since abolish'd by Act of Parliament but such Bishops have never troubled Papist's Marriages made by Priests or Jesuits with Romish Ceremony nor Null'd them or Bastardized their Children such Protestants have been Excommunicated Cursed and given to Satan when a Dog hath not dared against Papists to move his Tongue such Protestants have been Confiscated and cast into Prison when Papists have Triumphed in Liberty and Propriety 2. Many Able Loyal Zealous Protestant-Ministers are hereby Excluded from Preaching and Teaching the Gospel 3. Many able Loyal and Useful Instruments both in Civil and Military Offices who are Protestants are Excluded and the King and Parliament deprived of their Service 4. The Offices and Arms of the Three Kingdoms are ingross'd into the hands of Persons Recommended by Papists An Essay of the Form of a Test whereat it seems no Protestant can scruple I A. B. do utterly Testifie and Declare in my Conscience and in the presence of God and do believe that the Pope or Bishop of Rome or any Bishop on Earth is not the Head of the Catholick Church nor of any National Church of England Scotland or Ireland and that they are not Infallible and that all such Popes and Bishops as pretend to Supremacy either Spiritual or Temporal or Infallibility without a Sign of Mission from God are Hereticks I believe that the Host Consecrated Crucifixes Images Idols Reliques of Saints or Saints themselves ought not to be Worshipt or Prayed to in Publick or Private and that the Mass is Idolatry I believe neither Popes nor Bishops have any Power or Mission from God to Exact Auricular Confession or to Impose Penance or to give Absolution Indulgence or Pardon of Sin or to Redeem from Purgatory or to give or sell Heaven or Paradise or any Place in the same or to Excommunicate Curse or Deliver to Satan And I do therefore utterly Abjure and Renounce all Absolutions Indulgences Pardons of Sins and Redemptions from Purgatory given or to be given by any such said Popes or Bishops or any deriving Authority from them and defie all their Excommunications And I do Promise and Swear to be True and Faithful to our Sovereign Lord the King his Heirs and lawful Successors So help me God Whether any Test of the Conscience ought to be Penal either to Protestant or Papist It seems not 1. Because to Plant Religion by Penalty is to Plant it by the Sword whereof Christ gave neither Precept nor Example but rather a Prohibition Implicit in his Express Command to Peter Matth. 26.52 Then said Jesus unto him Put up again thy Sword into his place for all they that take the Sword shall perish with the Sword Which though it prohibit not lawful Defence to those who have the Power of the Sword which Peter had
not yet it prohibits unlawful Invasions amongst all which that of Conscience is the greatest with a Denunciation of the ill Success shall follow sufficiently verified in the many Examples of Emperors and Princes when they went to make War against such as Defended their Conscience 2. To Plant Religion by the Sword is a Relapse to Popery and we commit that Crime our selves which we impute to be the highest in them 3. Error in Conscience is not in the Power of the Party to Redress it is unjust therefore to Impose a Penalty for what was not in the Parties Power to prevent before or amend after 4. Thoughts ought not to be punish'd by men before they break into External Acts or at least discover themselves by Words or Deeds to External Witnesses 5. Tests Penal are no other than the Romish Inquisition compelling men to accuse themselves Criminally or to commit Perjury to avoid it or to rebell to Defend themselves against it 6. Protection is the more Honourable which is hence given the Consciences of Foreign Protestants against Foreign Papists by how much the more merciful the dealing is of the Native Protestants here towards the Consciences of their Native Papists 7. If a Test is made Penal it ceases to be a Test for men will Swear contrary to their Consciences to avoid the Penalty whereas if no Penalty on Confession they would confess the Truth 8. This will Punish the Innocent together with the Nocent there being many of the poor sort of Papists who Curse the Covetousness of their great Ones who take Bribes Gifts and Pensions to themselves and leave the Inferiors exposed to all the Dangers It is a sufficient Use of a Test therefore if it only Dis-Office the Papist to preserve the Publick Government in Protestant-hands Whether Papists or Protestants ought to be Compell'd to Confession of Faith or any External Form or Ceremonies of Worship against their Conscience by Penalties It seems not 1. Because a Non-Compulsion is not an Approbation Non enim idem est ferre aliquid ferendum probare si quid probandum non est Cic. Fam. Epist L. 9. Ep. 6. Neither is it as much as a Toleration of the Popish Forms of Worship either of Images Idols Crucifixes Crosses Beads Reliques Masses c. But all Acts of Parliament remain in as full force against these Superstitions as before and the Command of Scripture as performable Deut. 12.2 Ye shall utterly destroy all the Places wherein the Nations which ye shall possess served their Gods upon the high Mountains and upon the Hills and under every Green Tree And you shall overthrow their Altars and break their Pillars and burn their Groves with Fire and you shall hew down the Graven Images of their Gods and destroy the Names of them out of that Place But a Non-Compulsion amounts to no more than this That the Penal Acts against Recusancy and Non-Conformity may be laid aside equally as to Papist and Protestant which destroy all Conscience in both 2. Because a Non-Compulsion doth not hinder but advance a Publique free Worship according to such Form and Ceremonies as shall be allowed by the King and Parliament only it frees from Force and takes away the Usurpt Supremacy of the Bishops of Forming Godliness into Gain by restoring it to the Legislative Power of the King and Parliament 3. Recusancy is easier foil'd by giving way than contending and Conformity easier won with Lenity than Rigor Vitia quaedam faciliùs tollit Princeps si patiens eorum est saith Senec. de Clementia Cede repugnanti cedendo Victor abibis Minus placet magis quod suadetur quod dissuadetur placet Plautus Noli Vitia irritare vetando Vidi ego nuper equum contra sua fraena tenacem Ore reluctanti fulminis ire modo Constitit ut primum Laxatas Sensit habenas Fraenaque in Effusa Laxa Jacere juba Ovid. I saw my self an Horse curb'd with a Bit To flie like lightning in despight of it But still he stood as soon as he no Check Felt and the loose Reins cast were on his Neck 4. Chrysostome Hom. 19. in Matth. saith Do the Sheep persecute the Wolf No but the Wolf the Sheep Whence appears that those Protestants who persecute Dissentient Protestants for their Conscience are Wolves in Sheeps Clothing and to be Censur'd far worse than the Papists who do it openly in the Form of a Wolf 5. Thy own Conscience is not Infallible nor Immutable Let him that standeth take heed lest he fall It were a great shame therefore to be over-violent in that from which thy own Conscience or Practice may perhaps eftsoones be Changed 6. Non-Compulsion to discover it self to punishment is the best Right that a Conscience so Innocent as abstains from discovering it self only that it may not thereby offend can crave Tacere liceat nulla Libertas minor à Rege petitur Senec. Oedip. Govetousness the only cause of Compulsion of the Conscience to Confession of Faith or Form of Worship 7. The Final cause of Punishing Consciences which are silent and offend not is only Insatiable Covetousness which can pretend no other cause or colour of taking the Spoils of Innocents Thus Popes and Bishops Rob and Murder the greatest part of Christendome under the name of Hereticks And the Turks the greatest part of the World under the name of Unbelievers and Mahomet after he hath in many places of his Alcoran incited his followers to Fight with Kill and Slay such Unbelievers and take their Goods and Lands from them wherever they can find them he Commandeth them to bring a share of the Spoils to the Prophet meaning himself and saith further Alc. cap. 61. God loveth those who Fight in Rank and File for his Law And what other Doctrine and Practice do Popes and Bishops Preach and Act but the same which shall take the Spoil of the miserable People they get under their Power for no other Crime but their Conscience for this they contend one with another and offer Force to destroy the Conscience it self and Body and Soul with it so they may Seise their Prey of Goods and Lands as Jezabel did of Naboth 1 Kings 21.8 So she wrote Letters in Ahab's name and Sealed them with his Seal and sent the Letters unto the Elders and Nobles that were in his City dwelling with Naboth And she wrote in the Letters saying Proclaim a Fast and set Naboth on high among the People and set two men Sons of Belial before him to bear witness against him saying Thou did'st Blaspheme God and the King And the men of his City even the Elders and the Nobles who were the Inhabitants in his City did as Jezabel had sent unto them They Proclaimed a Fast and set Naboth on high among the People And there came in two men Children of Belial and sate before him and the men of Belial witnessed against him even against Naboth in the presence of the People saying Naboth did Blaspheme God and
Luke 15.10 There is joy in the presence of the Angels of God over one Sinner that Repenteth Nor though they call themselves Shepherd of the Flock are they like the good Shepherd of whom Christ speaketh Matth. 18.12 If a man have an Hundred Sheep and one of them be gone astray doth he not leave the Ninety and Nine and goeth into the Mountains and seeketh that which is gone astray And if so be that he find it Verily I say unto you he rejoiceth more of that Sheep than of the Ninety and Nine which went not astray Nor like Christ who saith John 8.50 I seek not my own Glory Nor like Paul who saith 2 Cor. 12.14 I seek not yours but you And Hebr. 13.14 Here have we no continuing City but we seek one to come Nor like those he saith died in the Faith Hebr. 11.13 Not having received the Promises but having seen them afar off and were persuaded of them and embraced them and confessed that they were strangers and Pilgrims on the Earth For they that say such things declare plainly that they seek a Countrey And truly if they had been mindful of that Countrey from whence they came out they might have had opportunity to have returned But now they desire a better Countrey that is an Heavenly None of which Examples would the Alexandrian or Syadan Bishop nor many others follow nor do they with their Penal Tests Forms and Ceremonies Persecute to Convert but to Pervert and to that end form their Tests Oaths and Ceremonies as contrary to Sense Reason and Conscience as they can possible and as numerous as they are in the 39. Articles that they may have all either under blind obedience and take Arbitrarily from them what they please or if they will not Renounce their Sense Reason and Conscience they may have a pretence to Plunder them of their Goods and a Terrible Disappointment it would be to Bishops and their Chaplains if all Ministers should have turn'd Conformists to their Faith Oaths Subscriptions and Ceremonies for then would all Pluralities have been supplied with single Incumbents Residents on the Places and perhaps the greater part of the Bishopricks and Benefices with men more above Exception than many of the Possessors may be and there might have been many Peters in the Church yet not a Simon found amongst them 9. There ought to be no Compulsion used to Papists to Pray in a Temple because it is already proved to be Prohibited by Christ for any to Pray in a Temple or publick Place except the Parties are agreed 10. It is a Compulsion many times of a doubtful Conscience either to Sin or Damnation as some have doubted Rom. 14.23 or Martyrdom or Hypocrisie to save their Lives or Goods 11. It is as great a mockery of God to force men to play the Hypocrites in Ceremonies or Prayers against their Consciences in a place of Publick Convention as to drive Horses and other Cattle into the Church at the time of Prayer there and as Banks did his Horse make them fall on their Knees and Worship the Cross 12. Compulsion of Papists or Protestants to Forms of Common-Prayer deprives them of the Benefit of being taught the Gospel by Reason that no distinction of the place and time of Prayer and Preaching is made according to the Examples and Precepts of Christ already shewn for all the Common-Prayer being Formed by Popes or Bishops is chopt into so many pieces of Prayers Chapters Lessons Responds Letanies Psalms pieces of Epistles pieces of Gospels c. as Confound both Method and Memory and thereby while the People endeavour to Pray and Learn both at once they can do neither effectually 13. Compulsion to Common-Prayer deprives both Papist Protestant of the Benefit of either Reading or Hearing the Scripture Read 1. Because it is Read in such a mangled immethodical way neither according to the Contexture of the History nor according to the Titles of a Concordance or Polyanthy but both Examples and Precepts broken off confusedly from what preceded or followed them whereby they are made unintelligible and not again joined with such of one another as should mutually expound them and both Prayers and Psalms are Read in such a Canting Note in Cathedrals as they are not intelligible so as there is no human Author Art or Science Read or Taught so confusedly immethodically and Cantingly as the Scripture whereby such as cannot Read themselves never hear the same Read in any Edifying way their whole Lives which is done only on design of gain to make more Dissentient Ministers and fewer of the Trade 2. Those who are able to Read themselves are thereby deprived of the Reading the same at their Homes the Papists by their own Priests being not suffer'd to have an English Bible in their Houses and the Protestants in England being not suffer'd by their Priests to keep themselves at their Houses whereas in Holland many Devout Pious Protestants never go to Churches to hear the Scripture Read but Read the same on Sundays at home at their own Houses and are far more ready and skilful and more Pious in practice of the same than those that do Repair to the Publick Reading neither is there any man Compell'd to Church or Chappel there but may if they desire follow the Precept of Christ to Read or Pray privately in their Closet and the Example of the Primitive Christians amongst whom there was not a Temple or Altar for neer 300 Years after Christ till Constantine corrupted them to set up Cathedrals 3. Many things in the Common-Prayer being offensive to many Consciences I dispute not whether weak or strong or whether they are offences given or taken but being offensive to many such as are offended and who would gladly come to the Church to hear the Scripture Read by it self or Expounded in an Exposition or Lecture or Sermon if the same were done as Christ always used to do it in a Synagogue without Prayer mixt with it the Reasons whereof are sufficiently before shew p. 〈◊〉 but some Consciences scrupling to mix any Prayers with Preaching in a Synagogue contrary to the Precept of Christ others scrupling the Forms of Common-Prayer whether single or mixt they lose the hearing of Scripture Read because they shall be forced to hear such Prayers as offend them Read or mixt with it as long as they are compell'd how can it be expected but the number of Non-Conformists will be far greater than Conformists Nonconformity to the Prayer before Sermon 14. As the mixture of Common-Prayer deprives both Papists and Protestant of the Benefit of hearing the Scripture Read in the Historical Contexture and Order wherein it was left written so the Prayer before Sermon deprives them of the Benefit of hearing the Scripture Expounded either in that Method and Order it was left written or in any other Order or Method appointed by the King and Parliament of such matters as are necessary to Salvation and
tend most to the Peace of the Church for unless there were an Interval for the Bell to Toll a space after the end of the Prayer before the beginning of the Sermon the Parish who love not long Prayer will not be able to know when the Sermon begins and very many of them though they would be all glad to join with the Chaplain in his Prayer for the King yet will they many of them perhaps have Scruples in Conscience to join with him in Prayer for his Patron Patron if to be Prayed for in Publick 1. Because he may sometimes happen to be a Papist and one that seeks the Destruction of the Protestant Religion and all Protestants and many may grow doubtful to Pray for the Prosperity of such a one the same seeming to be Prohibited 2 John 10 11. Where it is said If there come any unto you and bring not this Doctrine receive him not into your House neither bid him God speed For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of all his Evil Deeds Patron a Papist 2 As to Publick Persons we are directed by the Scripture to Pray in Publick for none but Persons in publick Authority but a Papist is by Acts of Parliament Excluded from all publick Authority and Office therefore no publick Person 3. As to private Persons the Scripture and practice of the Primitive Christians direct to Pray for no private Persons particularly and by name but such as are sick or possess'd by the Devil for in such Case the direction of Christ and practice of the Primitive Church was to cast him out by Fasting and Prayer but many Patrons are neither sick nor possess'd therefore there is no direction in Scripture for them to be Prayed for by name in publick 4. The Chaplain useth to Pray for Bishops especially if Patrons wherein many Protestants may not be free to join in regard they many of them assume to themselves to be Judges of Heresie and the Rule of Heresie they make is the Four first General Councils and the Papal Canons for Ceremonies and against Lollaries the Parliament deceived by the Bishops to leave the Four first Councils the Rule of Heresie was 1. Eliz. 1. In which Act to Prohibited Commissioners appointed by the Queen by virtue of that Act If Bishops are Papists or to be Prayed for who Judge Heresy by the four first Councils to proceed in Judgment of Heresie beyond the words prescribed them the words-Prohibited in a Proviso are these viz. Shall not in any wise have Authority or Power to Order Determine or Adjudg any Matter or Cause to be Heresie but only such as heretofore have been Determined Order'd or Adjudged to be Heresie by Authority of the Canonical Scriptures or by the first Four General Councils or any of them or by any other General Council wherein the same was declared Heresie by express and plain words of the said Canonical Scriptures or such as shall hereafter be Order'd Judged or Determined to be Heresie by the High Court of Parliament of this Realm with the Assent of the Clergy in their Convocation Of the Four first General Councils by which Bishops would Judg Heresie and of the Suspition lies on such Judges to be Papists and not to be Prayed for in Publick The Four first General Councils which I suppose they mean were the Council of Nice in Bithynia the Council of Constantinople where the Great Turk Lives the Council of Ephesus where the Great Diana of the Ephesians and the Image which fell from Jupiter were Worshipt and the Council of Chalcedon in Bithynia Council of Nice As to the Council of Nice there were two one about Anno Dom. 330. the other about Anno Dom. 381. In the First called by Constantine the Great there were 318 Bishops in another call'd by another Constantine there were 350 Bishops which of these our Bishops would have I cannot tell but they may wink and choose and though each was Nice yet neither of them was more Nice than Wise for the Profit of the Bishops and the Bishops 1. Eliz. were as wise as they to join the Canonical Scriptures and the Council of Nice that nothing should be Judged Heresie without their Joint Consent for the Canonical Scripture hath not so much as one Bishop they having falsely translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Bishop which ought to have been an Overseer of the Poor so as there is not one Bishop to be found in Scripture to be a Judg of Heresie any more than of Marriage whereas at one of the Nices there were 350. And in the Scripture is not one Image found lawful to be Worshipped whereas at both the Nices there were a multitude Set up Images and at the last Nice all the Holy Images of Irene the Empress which the Emperor Leo Isaurus had knockt to pieces were Restored and Two and Twenty Canons thereupon made That all Image-breakers should be adjudged Hereticks to the great profit no doubt of the Holy Bishops who knew as well as the Silver-Smiths of Diana wherein their Gain lay Council of Constantinople The Council of Constantinople was a General Council call'd about the Year of our Lord 383 by Theodosius the Emperor where were 150 Bishops of several Sects 36 of them were Macedonians who held the Holy-Ghost to be an Angel because Christ is said to send him and Macedonius their Teacher was then Bishop of Constantinople the place where this Council Sate Him this Council Deposed and his Party became thereon Excluded Members whereby all Votes passed for the Bishop of Romes Doctrine with whom the Bishop of Constantinople was always a dangerous Corrival for Supremacy there were joined in this Council Theodosius Gratian Confirmed Images and Damasus the Pope this Council confirmed the Nicene Faith and their Worshipping of Images for a Pope could not live without them Council of Ephisus Another General Council was called at Ephesus about the Year 834 by the Emperor Theodosius the Second and by the Instigation of Pope Celestine the First against Nestorius then Bishop of Constantinople who according to Evagrius l. 1. c. 7. held That the Blessed Virgin Mary ought to be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Mother of Christ Continued Images and not the Mother of God which Doctrine being dangerous to the Worshipping of Images and the drawing of the Supremacy from Rome to Constantinople the Pope got the Council called and not to sit as formerly at Constantinople but at Ephesus where Nestorius had not so much Power and there being not able to bring him to Submit to the See of Rome they Deposed him and Banished him to Oasis This Council of Ephesus is said to have left Two Copies of its Canons in certain and variant one from another and some of them are Condemn'd by the Council of Chalcedon as Suppositious which besides the Worshipping of Images continued by this Council makes it a
the colour and pretence of a former Contract made with another the which Contract divers times was but very slenderly proved and often but surmised by the malice of the party who desired to be dissolved from the Marriage which they liked not and to be coupled with another There was an Act made That all and every such Marriages as within the Church of England should be Contracted and Solemnized in the face of the Church and Consummate with Bodily knowledge or fruit of Children or Child being had between the parties so married should be by Authority of the said Parliament Deémed Iudged and taken to be Lawful Good Iust and Indissolvable notwithstanding any pre-contract or pre-contracts of Matrimony not Consummate with Bodily knowledge which either of the Persons so married or both had made with any other Person or Persons before the time of Contracting of that Marriage which is Solemnized or Consummated or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as by the same Act more plainly may appear Since the time of which Act. although the same was Godly meant the unruliness of Men hath ungodlily abused the same and divers inconveniences intolerable in manner to Christian Ears and Eyes followed thereupon Women and Men breaking their own promises and faiths made by the one unto the other so set upon sensuality and pleasure that if after the Contract of Matrimony they might have whom they more favoured and desired they could be contented by lightness of their nature to over-turn all that they had done afore and not afraid in manner even from the very Church-door and Marriage Feast the Man to take another Spouse and the Spouse to take another Husband more for Bodily lust and carnal knowledge then for surety of faith truth or having God in their good remembrance contemning many times also the Commandment of the Ecclesiastical Iudge forbidding the parties having made the Contract to attempt or do any thing in prejudice of the same Be it therefore Enacted by the King's Highness The Lords Spiritual Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled That as concerning pre-contracts the said former Statute shall from the first day of May next coming cease be repealed and of no force or effect and be reduced to the estate and order of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm which immediately before the making of the said Statute in this case were used in this Realm So that from the said first day of May when any cause or contract of Marriage is pretended to have beén made it shall be lawful to the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudge of that place to hear and examine the said Cause And having the said Contract sufficiently and lawfully proved before him to give sentence for Matrimony commanding Solemnization Co-habitation Consummation and Tractation as it becometh Man and Wife to have with inflicting all such pains upon the disobedients and disturbers thereof as in times past before the said Statute the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudges by the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws ought and might have done if the said Statute had never been made Any Clause Article or Sentence in the said Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Of the Law making private Marriage or carnal knowledge between persons not prohibited by the Law of God to marry Fornication Private Marriage or carnal knowledge is of two sorts the one without publick Witness the other without any Witness at all and both by the Popish Laws because if permitted they would spoil their gains are prohibited and called clandestine Marriages The publick Witnesses are the Priest or Magistrate private Witnesses are any other Marriage without Witness nor clandestine not appointed by Law The Law of England makes all private Marriage and carnal knowledge without publick Witness Fornication The Law of Scotland in some cases relieves though there be a defect and no publick Witness of the Marriage by the Priest as appears in the before cited Author Craig Feud 269. If there appear private Witnesses of Men or Instruments but in all cases likewise where there are neither publick or private Witnesses they leave it to be Fornication That which I here affirm against both is Marriage without Witness not Fornication 1. That carnal knowledge between parties not prohibited by the Law of God to marry is not Fornication nor any other Crime though in the highest secrecy and without any Testimony of Men or Instruments whatsoever 2. That privacy of Marriage being not prohibited nor publication commanded by God all parties ought to have liberty of Conscience to use the one or the other according as suits best with their occasions As to the first there are these reasons That private Marriage without Witness is not Fornication nor any other Crime 1. There is no Law of God prohibiting private Marriage without Witness Where there is therefore no Law there is no transgression Rom. 4.15 2. It is before shewen That for any human Law to prohibit Marriage or Meat where not prohibited by the Law of God the same came from the Devil 1 Tim. cap. 4. v. 1 2 3. And that therefore the Law of the Pope and Council of Trent which nulls all Marriages except made before a Priest in a Temple and two Witnesses came from the Devil and the Priests of Priapus and Venus for filthy lucre to the Priests 3. Isa 45.7 It is said I create evil And Isa 5.20 It is said Wo unto them that call good evil and evil good That put darkness for light and light for darkness Here is therefore a curse pronounced against those who if God created not marriage without Witnesses evil of their own heads call it evil and where God created it to be in darkness and natural modesty of their own heads will have it by Torch-light and the whole Parish of Witnesses 4. All Fornication is Polyandry and Confusio seminum whereby the Child cannot know the Father nor the Father the Child but here is no such thing it is impossible therefore to be Fornication Liberty Conscience to marry with or without Witnesses As to the second Point which I am to maintain That privacy of Marriage without Witnesses being not prohibited by the Law of God nor publication commanded by the same no human power ought to presume to prohibit what Marriage God hath not prohibited but all persons ought to be left liberty of Conscience to marry publickly or privately with or without Witnesses as it suits best with their conveniences and occasions as is the use and practice in all other civil Contracts which men do with or without Witnesses as they think best and were never accused of sin if they had no Witnesses whereon to bring their Action only that Party is justly charged with sin who wilfully breaks his Contracts because there are no Witnesses but God to prove it against him Against these Positions I shall first answer the Objections and then shew further Reasons to confirm the same
gravity when he meets another especially when they come to discourse of their rare Art of Divinity in finding Birds Nests and filling them with young Cuckows making the People beleive they are Sparrows So here appears an impossibility if theâ—â— were a Thousand Witnesses for any of them to Testifie Marriage or Filiation but the Parents and it is before shewn God hath not prohibited Marriage without Witnesses nor made it Fornication and it is likewise shewn That the Law prohibiting Marriage without Witnesses came from the Devil only for the filthy lucre of the Priests and no inconvenience can be objected against Private Marriage and Carnal knowledg without Witnesses or if there could yet allegare inconveniens non est solvere argumentum so positively deduced from the Law of God I conclude as before First That here is nothing objected which can make private carnal knowledg between Persons not prohibited by the Law of God to Marry Fornication Mischiefs of publick Marriage Secondly That therefore liberty of Conscience ought to be permitted to Dissentients from the Popish Law to marry publickly or privately with or without Witnesses as suits best with their desires and conveniences Rivalry First Because compulsion to publick Marriage or Wooing causeth Rivalry both in Men and Beasts and publick Wars and Calamities amongst Men have insued from Rivals to one Woman and Nature it self hath instructed the Beasts which are not able to defend themselves to retire into Woods and secret places in Pairs to secure themselves from Rivals Polyandry Secondly This causeth Polyandry when one Woman is Courted by two or many Rivals she lies under the Temptation of tasting them all and not till necessitated to fix on one this likewise Nature teacheth Beasts by secret retirements of their Females to avoid promiscuous Sires of their young Rape Thirdly It exposeth Brides to Rapes thus did the Lapithae lay their plot to fight for a Bride at a publick Wedding which if the Marriage had been secret without Witnesses had been prevented So had the wicked Laws of King Evenus the Moors and Indian Bramyns that Courtiers and Priests should have the first Nights Lodging which were Rapes on the Brides and might have been prevented and those filthy Laws would have been to no purpose if the secret Marriages of Nature without publick or private Witnesses had been observed Fourthly As publication of Marriages Fraud or intention of Marriage before Witnesses may cause Rape and Violence so it may cause Fraud and Deceit which a secret Marriage only known to the Parties would prevent as appears Gen. 29.21 And Jacob said unto Laban give me my Wife for my days are fulfilled that I may go in unto her And Laban gather'd together all the men of the place here are publick Witnesses enough and made a Feast And it came to pass in the Evening that he took Leah his Daughter and brought her to him and he went in unto her And Laban gave unto his Daughter Leah Zilpah his maid for a handmaid And it came to pass that in the Morning behold it was Leah and he said unto Laban What is this thou hast done unto me did I not serve thee for Rachel wherefore then hast thou beguiled me Now if all the men of the place had not been called together but Jacob had gone in unto Rachel secretly he had prevented so great a Fraud of Laban put upon him I happening to be in Scotland had the honour of acquaintance with a Gentleman there and I thank him of receiving a noble entertainment at his House concerning whose Marriage I was given this relation There were two young Ladies Sisters of great Beauty drawn by the Pencel of Nature and not of Art and not in her vulgar manner as express'd by the Love-Poet Facies non omnibus una est Nec diversa tamen qualem decet esse Sororum But so like one another that they could not easily be distinguished each was Gratusque parentibus error often beguiling their Parents with that pleasant deceit One of these Ladies was married by this Gentleman and as I remember I was likewise informed that the Scots Custom was to make themselves merry at their Weddings that the next day after the Brideall night when Dinner was ended and a Voider brought in the Bridegroom was to stand with a Creile or Basket on his Back and the Company used as they pleased to throw into the same as into a Voider so long till the Bride in good-nature took it off from him with her own hand which the fooner she did the better Wife they judged she would be the Bridegroom being put to this task of the Creile many loaded upon him so long and the Bride shewing no pity releive him he looked back very wistly on her as he thought saying Sweet-heart will you not help me She Answer'd No I am a Maid whereat the company fell a laughing which much amused the Bridegroom at last after they had made sufficient sport with him about it the true Bride was brought down the stairs who took off his Burden the other who refused being her Sister dress'd in her Cloaths Here might far easier have been a deceit imposed then by Leah had there not been greater honour and virtue in the Parties then in Laban yet neither here could it have been done if the Marriage had been secret Against natural Modesty Fourthly Compulsion to marry before publick Witnesses and denial of liberty of private marriage without Witnesses is destructive to the modesty of Nature appointed by God to distinguish Men from Beasts which in all chast and vertuous Persons desires the Vail of Secrecy Adam and Eve made them Aprons of Fig-leaves though they were Man and Wife and none saw them but themselves and the wild Africans and Americans with Skins and Feathers cover their shame Boaz Ruth 3.14 though he intended to marry Ruth yet to keep sâ—cret her lying at his Feet amongst the Sheaves that Night he makes her rise in the dark before one could know one another and bids her not let it be known that a Woman came into the floor And Prov. 30.19 Agar saith There are three things too wonderful for me yea four which I know not The way of an Eagle in the Air The way of a Serpent upon a Rock The way of a Ship in in the midst of the Sea And the way of a Man with a Maid Neither would they ever admit amongst the Hebrews any such idle thing as Banes or publication of Marriage but a Virgin amongst them was called Almah that is hidden or a recluse from the sight of men taking that custom from the Eastern Countries in divers of which the custom of keeping Virgins in their Parents Houses unseen of men is so rigorously observed that their very Wooers are not suffer'd to see them till married and brought to their Beds but marry them on good report as Princes use to do Dishonours the Parties Fifthly Publick Wooing
causeth dishonour to each Party and if any Man address himself publickly to a Lady as a Suiter and after sight likes her not but deserts her this will disparage her the thoughts of the next that is wished are that she hath been blown on and refused the like will it be to the Man if the Lady refuse him Causeth Fornication Adultery Stews and Brothels Sixthly Denial of liberty of private Marriage and punishing the same as Fornication compells men to what is true Fornication and Adultery for if men cannot be allowed secret Marriage and secret Wives without Witnesses they will take secret Fornication and Adultery and secret Whores and Adulteresses without Witnesses which is a Thousand times worse So what St. Austin says Deme lupanaria turbabis omnia libidinibus is not true nor is Toleration of Stews the Remedy appointed by God to cure Lust but private Marriage is the Remedy appointed by God to cure the Stews for it is said by Paul To avoid Fornication let every Man have his own Woman and every Woman her own Man which if denied to such Persons with whose Conveniencies or Conscience it stands not to take a Woman or a Man publickly before Witnesses and a Priest in a Temple is to deny them to take any Man or Woman at all Whereas if liberty were given of private Marriage without Witnesses to such Persons as are not by the Law of God prohibited to marry this would destroy all Stews and Brothel-Houses for what Man or Woman who have liberty to choose whom they like best and to enjoy them privately to themselves would be so mad to hazard themselves in common Stews to be infected with those miserable and deadly Diseases to be robbed stript have their Throats cut or at least spirited to a Ship sold to Barbado's or Barbary or if they scape those greater dangers to be all their Lives persued by Constables Parators Bedels hooted at by Boys Carted Whipt Pumpt and to come to Bridewell and Beggary at last Seventhly Publick Marriages are too costly for the Poor therefore to prohibit them private Marriage Too costly for the poor is to prohibit them all Marriage except such as will undo them the Grand Seignior himself dares not venture on that is publick or the cost of it which is one reason he is never married publickly by a Priest in a Temple One Man may have reason to marry privately and another not and one to marry public and another not Eighthly There may be many reasons likewise both for Rich and Poor to marry secretly and one man may have a Reason which another hath not and it may be not only inconvenient but dangerous to one and not to another therefore it is fit every man seeing it is not prohibited by God should have liberty to marry publick or private with or without Witnesses as it suits best with his conveniencies Henry the Eighth married Ann Bulloigne the Mother of Queen Elizabeth on the 14 of Novemb. and kept the same so secret that it was not known till Easter after when she appeared great with Child And Arch-Bishop Cranmer was married and kept it so secret that it was not known till discovered by the King No doubt the King and Arch-Bishop both had very good reasons for what they did though they thought not fit to divulge them either before or after So Abraham and Isaac both endeavoured to keep their Marriages secret by telling lies they had very good reason for their Secrecy though not for their Lies From what hath been said appears therefore to be proved First That private marriage or carnal knowledg without Witnesses between Persons not prohibited by the Law of God to marry is not Fornication or any other Crime Secondly That it is a remedy provided by God to prevent Fornication and that the same if not forbidden by Papal Episcopal Pontifical or other Diabolical Laws would overthrow all Stews Brothels and common Whores and the whole Mystery of Iniquity of the Romish Anti-Christ which fills his Coffers and supports his Power by these filthy gains and far worse then those Ex lotio collected by the covetous Emperour Vespasian Thirdly That it is a great sin to forbid to marry And that those forbid to marry who forbid either publick or private marriage where not prohibited by God or take away the free liberty of either or compel to either dissentients in Conscience or differents in Convenience and thereby become accessaries to all the Fornications Adulteries and other wickedness which ensue thereby Of the Law requiring Witnesses of Marriage and Filiation where both are acknowledged by the Parents and no third party claims the Father Mother or Child This irrational Law is put in practice where a Man and Woman not prohibited to marry by the Law of God cohabit or keep private company and the pretence is That every Man should have his own Wife and every Woman her own Husband by the testimony of Witnesses which is as frivolous when the parties themselves acknowledge though as is before proved they are not bound to acknowledg it neither is it a sin and none else pretends claim to the Man or Woman as 't is to require Witnesses of every one possessed of Lands or Goods or to force him to answer to a Bill of discovery of his Title where none other claimeth or pretendeth a Title better than his possession The like is it where a Man and Woman acknowledg a Child to be theirs they ought not to be examined nor forced to produce Witnesses whose the Child is unless another as the Harlot did before Solomon claim or pretend right to the Child for where there is no Controversie or Crime proved there needs no Witness or Judge In like manner where a Child is acknowledged by Parents in their life time the Inheritance ought to be suffer'd to continue to him as left without proof of Witness or Enquiry where no other pretends to be a Child to the same Parents or a better right then Filiation for where there is no Controversie between some parties nor Crime proved nor Suspicion there needs neither Inquisition nor Witness nor Judge Of the Law when claim is made by Corrivals of one Woman of Sequestration of her pendente placito and Sentencing either Man or Woman to be restored in Specie and not in Value That where there is a Breach of promise or Contract of Marriage between a Man or Woman they ought to have liberty to repair themselves in damage is granted but that a Woman is to be Sequestred pendente placito or that either Man or Woman is to be adjudged to be restored in specie is denied Sequestration of a Woman unlawful 1. As to the Sequestration of the Woman this is contrary to Magna Charta and the Petition of right to imprison a free Person before Judgment 2. None ought to be taken in Pledge Distrained or Sequestred which cannot be returned in as good Condition as when Taken
devour her Child as soon as it is born The People who are Terrae Filii to be the Earth helping the Woman Prelacy being wroth and going to make War with Dissentient Protestants to be the Dragons being wroth with the Woman and going to make War with the Remnant of her Seed which keep the Commandments of God Old Teslament false translated by Bishops in 848 places and have the Testimony of Jesus Christ And that these are not the only false translations which Bishops make of the Scripture appears by the great Linguist Broughton who in his Advertisements of Corruptions affirms to the then Bishops of England That their publick translations of Scriptures is such as that it perverts the Text of the Old Testament in no less then Eight Hundred Forty Eight places and causeth Millions to reject the New Testament and to run into Eternal Flames Sixthly To shew that Coke needs no other to confute him in the signification of Nothus not to be a Child born out of Wedlock but a plece of his own Rhime I shall recite it which is by him set down Manseribus scortum notho Moechus dedit ortum and is a false Verse for No in Notho is short which might happen by some Error of his Scribe but the true Verse is in Calv. Lex whence I suppose he might have it Sed Moecha Nothis dedit ortum which Moecha signifies an Adulteress which she cannot be unless she is a Married Woman therefore it is plain the Rhime it self confutes him that Nothus is not a Child born out of Wedlock but in Wedlock which is unanswerable as to him because ex ore suo though not as to others who are on better reasons unanswerably answer'd before They corrupt the Press both as to Scripture and Law and interdict Protestants to write against Papists or answer them Act of Parliament against Lollards counterfeit by Bishops Coke 3. part 40. saith There was a Statute supposed to be made 5. R. 2. That Commissions should be by the Lord Chancellor made and directed to Sheriffs and others to Arrest such as should be Certified into the Chancery by the Bishops and Prelates Masters of Divinity to be Preachers of Heresies and notorious Errors their Fautors Maintainers and Abetters and to hold them in strong Prison until they will justifie themselves to the Law of the Holy Church By colour of this supposed Act certain Persons that held Images were not to be worship'd c. were holden in strong Prison until they to redeem their vexation miserably yielded before these Masters of Divinity to take an Oath and did swear to worship Images which was against the Moral and Eternal Law of Almighty God We have said by colour of the supposed Statute c. not only in respect of the said Opinion but in respect also that the said supposed Act was in truth never any Act of Parliament though it was Entred in the Rolls of Parliament for that the Commons never gave their consent thereunto And therefore in the next Parliament the Commons prefer'd a Bill reciting the said supposed Act and constantly affirmed that they never assented thereto and therefore desired that the supposed Statute might be aniented and declared void For they protested that it was never their intent to be justified and to bind themselves and their Successors to Prelates more then their Ancestors had done in times past And hereunto the King gave his Royal Assent in these words Ypleist au Roy. And mark well the manner of the penning the Act for seeing the Commons did not assent thereunto the words of the Act are It is Ordained and Assented in this present Parliament That c. And so it was being but by the King and the Lords It is to be known that of ancient time when any Acts of Parliament were made to the end the same might be published and understood especially before the use of Printing came into England the Acts of Parliament were ingrossed into Parchment and bundled up together with a Writ in the King's name under the great Seal to the Sheriff of every County sometime in Latine and sometime in French to command the Sheriff to proclaim the said Statutes within his Bailwick as well within Liberties as without And this was the course of Parliamentary Proceedings before Printing came in use in England and yet it continued after we had the Print till the Reign of H. 7. Now at the Parliament holden in 5. R. 2. John Braibrook Bishop of London being Lord Chancellor of England caused the said Ordinance of the King and Lords to be inserted into the Parliamentary Writ of Proclamation to be proclaimed amongst the Acts of Parliament which Writ I have seen the purclose of which Writ after the recital of the Acts directed to the Sheriff of N. in these words Nos volentes dictas concordias sive ordinationes in omnibus singulis suis Articulis inviolabiter observari tibi praecipimus quod praedictas concordias sive ordinationes in locis infra Balivam tuam ubi melius expedire volueris tam infra libertates quam extra Publice Proclamari teneri facias juxta formam Praenotatam Teste Rege apud Westm 26. Maij. Anno Regni Regis R. 2.5 But in the Parliamentary Proclamation of the Acts passed in Anno 6. R. 2. the said Act of the 6. R. 2. whereby the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was declared to be void is omitted and afterwards the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was continually Printed and the said Act of 6. R. 2. hath been by the Prelates ever from time to time kept from the Print A Counterfeit Act Printed by Bishops against Protestants What English Protestant can read this without horror what doth he not observe it why 't is that Counterfeit Act of Parliament 5. R. 2.1382 whereby Bishops usurp to be Judges of the Souls and Consciences of Protestants and to put them in strong Prison till they conform and submit to the will of the Bishop 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they usurp to be Judges of Heresie and to make Protestants Hereticks when they please 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have compell'd the Subjects to swear to worship their Idols 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have dragged so many Pious Martyrs to the Stake and burnt them filling the whole Land with fiery Furnaces 't is that Counterfeit Act by which the Bishops have usurped Power to destroy Religion Liberty Propriety and Lives of all Protestant Subjects at their pleasure 't is that Counterfeit Act which was never assented to but disclaimed detested abrogated and declared null and void by the House of Commons 6. R. 2. Anno 1383. and hath been yet most presumptuously caused to be printed as a valid Act by the Bishops being Masters of the Press and the true Act of Abrogation 6. R. 2. Whereon all the Subject hath depends most wickedly suppress'd and never Printed Coke 2.
Bells Transform'd to Ring to Weddings and to Knells To an Aceldama their Church turn'd next And the dead Bones for Burial-Fees they vext Their restless rest thus purchased in vain They then for Reliques dig'd them up again And sell their Merits though of Tyburn-Saints And Heaven to all whose Purse or Faith not faints Oh Joseph of Arimathea nam'd And on the British-Shores for ever fam'd Whose Ship of Olive-planks from Palestine Of Tidings glad the Pacquet brought Divine The Sea Nymphs danc'd each with a Triton Mate For joy thou mad'st their Isles the Fortunate Oh tell us had thy Vessels such broad sides Of Canon as that which in Tybur rides Whose roaring Thunder beats and buries Towns Cities and Churches Kingdoms and their Crowns And sinks them how or whither none can tell To Time-set Limbo's or Eternal Hell Or from thy Bark being then the Western-Church Thy Passengers to leave so in the lurch Did'st thou cast overboard and in the Dark Leave them there to be snapt by the old Shark That thou their Cargo rifle might'st the while And Gold and Silver like a Pyrat vile Tell us did Christ the great or lesser Curse Teach who were bad before to make them worse Or Bless or Curse not did he who did say Intend and mean the clean contrary way Who left his Peace did he bid to annoy Who came the World to save would he destroy From Satan who so oft deliver'd men Them back again did he cast to his Den He in this World who Kingdom would have none Did he bid Priests Depose Kings from the Throne Deliverance to Captives who did Preach Priests them to starve in Prison did he Teach When Peter warm'd did for his Master mourn All whom he Master'd did he bid him burn No Joseph no this was not the good Seed Thou brought'st and Sow'd'st whereon the Flocks might feed The Evil One those Fiery tasted Tares Sowed and them intangled with Snares None but the Devil from th' Infernal Pit Doth Curse and Ban and Fire and Brimstone Spit Great Hus and Jerom now for ever blest Oh two true Witnesses Slain by the Beast Whose Treachery safe Conduct gave to both But basely perjur'd broke it and his Oath You who made tremble the Infernal States And dared Attacque black Dis at his own Gates What was your Doctrine which so terrified The pompous Popedom in its highest Pride You held and that made them so highly hate That Bishops could not Excommunicate This did you both from thence to Heaven raise And sent you thither Crown'd with Fiery Bays And Sparks of you to Stellifie this sent With Protestants the British Firmament Brave Hero's now the horned Miter pull From Phalaris of Rome his Brazen Bull Hear your dead Martyrs how they do you press And cry from all his Fiery Furnaces Dismount his Canons from the Battlements Of his Church-Catholick which get his Rents Take from the Building but the Thunder-stone Oh then for ever down falls Babylon An Epode on Protestants Excommunicated by Papists What though with Bans and Curses They Rob and Kill and take our Purses In highest Faith come on And know there hath or shall be none Happy decreed by Fate But who first was or is unfortunate Arm Arm against the Devil He 'l flie and all his Spirits Evil. And Beast with Seven Heads At this time was a great noise in the Countries of Armies seen rising out of the ground and others in the Air. If on your Land or Sea he treads To fight him never spare Soldiers and Poor each one then take your share What though whole Armies rising From Earth are fearful hearts Surprising And Daemons of the Air Fighting in Clouds tempt to Despair What though they come from Hell There 's no Enchantment against Israel Hark how our Canons Thunder And keep the Romish Canons under Their Organs grunt and whine Our Flutes and Haubois are Divine And Cornets to the Skie Sound for Religion and for Liberty Angels to hear grow prouder Than their 's our holy Musick louder And valiant Souls shall bear From Death to Musick 's highest Sphere Who burn would not like a Brand That thus renown'd may die with Sword is hand Whether an Union can be of Protestant-Parliaments and Churches without a true Test between Papist and Protestant Test between Papist and Protestant Neither Protestant-Parliaments or Churches can be Known without a true Test much less therefore can they be United Whether Recusancy to pray in a Temple or in the Form of Common-Prayer is a true Test between Papist and Protestant A true Test ought to Provide and see that there be none in it of the Servants of the Lord but the Worshippers of Baal only 2 Kings 10.23 But in this of Recusancy to pray in a Temple are all the true Worshippers of God in Spirit and Truth if we may believe Christs Precept and Designation of them at large before Debated p. 210. c. in Reference to the Omnipresential Worship of God Christ in thy Closet bids thee Pray Thine is there both the Church and Key What though no Bishop walk'd it round Gods being there makes holy Ground The mischiefs of Compelling Protestants to a Form of Common-Prayer appear too much in being the occasion of the first breaking out of the late miserable Civil Wars and the Irreparable loss of his then Majesty the mischiefs of Compelling Papists to Protestant-Churches appear in this That one Church-Papist is more Dangerous than an Hundred open Absenters and they who truly understand the Danger of Mixing would rather think it prudent like the Primitive Christians to have a Non-Communion with Idolaters and their Ostiarii as they had to see none crept into the Places of their Convention for Prayer than compell such Bloody Spies incensed by Penal Laws thither to betray them Whether Recusancy to receive the Sacrament in a Temple or in the Common-Form is a true Test This likewise is before Discuss'd p. 212. and Examples of the frequent Poisoning the Sacrament by the Priest p. 240 241. To compell therefore any Eminent Protestants to Receive the Sacrament of such Persons of whom they cannot be assured were to be Accessary to their Murder Whether Subscription to the 39. Articles is a true Test 'T is shewn before That no true Test ought to endanger the Conscience of any Protestant but 't is notorious that the greatest part of Protestants are Dissentients in Conscience to divers Doctrines of the 39. Articles and therefore Subscription to the same is no true Test nor ought to be Imposed on them 1. Because these 39. Articles were made by the Bishops Anno 1562. in the Fourth Year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth while the Papist Peers were yet in Parliament and in Power who with the Bishops in their Front were too hard for her and of whom she might then say Res durae Regni Novitas me talia cogunt She was not able to perfect Reformation at one Stroke 2. Because
in these Articles Bishops presumed to be Legislators Judges and Executioners in their own Case for the Bishops make the Article 36. whereby they Constitute themselves Arch-Bishops and Bishops and Article 32. They Declare it lawful for all men to Marry Article 34. They Ridiculously make Traditions of the Church to be Changeable according to Diversity of Countries Times and mens Manners so before they come to their Ceremonial Law they set up their Legend-Law and the Ceremonies must be Founded on what Legends they please and no man must oppose either Tradition or Legend or Ceremonies set up by Common Authority that is by Authority of the Bishops for the House of Commons never Authorized them Rog. Art 34. Prop. 2. p. 196. Then Article 33. they Order Excommunication Delivery to Satan Penance and Absolution Then to compell the Observation of these Articles Anno 1603. They assume the Legislative Power to make Canons and Constitutions Ecclesiastical without the assent of the House of Commons they Order Saying or Singing of Common-Prayer and the Letany with all the Ceremonies prescribed by the Can. 14 15. Copes Surplices and Hoods to be wom in Cathedrals by Can. 17 27. Marriage not to be without Banns or License Can. 62. None to deliver from Satan without the Bishops License Can. 72. And no Minister to Preach Read Lecture or Catechize without Subscription to the 39. Articles Can. 36 37. And then to make clear work they Order That if any affirm any of the Nine and Thirty Articles made by the Arch-Bishops and Bishops to be in any part Erroneous or such as he may not with a good Conscience Subscribe to let him be Excommunicate Ipso facto which is without Summons or Hearing Can. 5. Can. 9. So unless the Protestant-Minister will Popishly acknowledg the Bishop to be Infallible and without Error and that all his Traditions and Ceremonies of Worship of Marriage and the like Ordained by Episcopal Authority are of Divine Right to oblige the Conscience and that he neither can Teach nor Fast nor Pray though to deliver from the Devil without his License Here is a Test wherein the Bishop assumes to be Legislator Judg an Ipso facto Executioner in his own Cause against a Protestant-Minister and not only prohibited to speak Book of 39. Articles and of Canons oblige not the Subjects to Clergy or Lay. but his Conscience to think against it in his own Defence 3. This Subscription to the 39. Articles ought not to be Imposed as a Test because neither the said Book of Articles nor Book of Canons had the Assent of the House of Commons at the time of their Making without whose Actual and Express Assent no Law or Canon or Article can be made to oblige the Subject which is more fully proved before Whether the Positive part of the Oath of Supremacy is a true Test The Form of the Oath 1. Eliz. 1. is as followeth I A. B. do utterly Testifie and Declare in my Conscience That the Kings Highness is the only Supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal and that no Foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preheminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm and therefore I do utterly Renounce and Forsake all Foreign Jurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the Kings Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors or Vnited and Annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm So help me God and by the Contents of this Book It being granted that no true Test can be which the Conscience of a Protestant weak or strong ignorant or knowing refuseth or is doubtful to take it is manifest that the positive part is refused by a very considerable part of the People and a greater part are doubtful and take it with Reluctancy yet are they such as cannot be doubted to be sincere Protestants in Religion and most Faithful and Loyal Subjects to the King and their Objections seem to be these 1. The words only Supreme Governor are of so infinite and unlimited an Extent in the Letter that there is necessity of limiting them in the intention which intention being Implicit only and not Express may be made so various by Expositors that the same likewise is infinitely ambiguous and unintelligible and that Pious Queen Elizabeth being at her first Entry to the Kingdom as good as under the Wardships of Bishops could not avoid the Forming of this Oath of Supremacy by them on the first Act and Year of her Reign and to impose the same on the Subjects not for her Benefit but their own though after finding the same so general obscure and wrested by false Interpretations she endeavour'd by a subsequent Declaration published to have explained and limited the same according to her true intention and meaning but the same being not done by Act of Parliament proved not sufficient to relieve many doubtful and wounded Consciences amongst the People of which vide more at large before p. 167 168. 2. The words Supreme Governor include both the Legislative Judicial and Executive Power The words only Supreme exclude Parliaments and the word only excludes literally the Parliament from having any Vote in either whereas the known Law of the Land is That no Law can be Enacted to bind the People without the mutual Assent of the King and their lawful Representative in Parliament and that no Contract of Supreme Government can be made without the Assent of two Parties at least and not one only 3. The words only Supreme Governor in all Spiritual things according to the Letter include the Papal Power of Dispensation with the Law of God of Receiving Confessions of Sins Imposing Penance Excommunication Absolution and Pardon of Sins which are Powers only belonging to God in Person and ought not to be Assumed or Exercised by Angels Saints Daemons or Men. 4. The same words include Supreme Power over the Souls and Consciences of men which is a Power belonging only to God in Person and ought not to be Assumed by Angels Saints Daemons or Men. 5. When all this Supremacy in Spiritual things is congested into an Oath and the Flowers inseparable from the Celestial Crown presumptuously attempted to be torn thence and annexed to a Temporal what is the Design and Effect of it but that the Bishop Robs both God and the King of the Supremacy pretended to both but intended to neither for where will the Bishop permit the Temporal Prince to dispense with the Law of God to Receive Confession of Sins to Impose Penance to Excommunicate to give Absolution and Pardon of Sins but he will command him to desist or what is worse with his Temporal Sword to beat the Bush that the Bishop may catch the Bird or with his
Rule of great incertainty to Judg Heresie Council of Chalceldon The last of the Four was the Council of Chalcedon in Bithynia which was called by the Emperor Martianus about the Year 455. whereat the Emperor was present in Person and 630 Bishops and Reverend Fathers from the greatest part of the World What a work is here who should Judg Heresie yet they never placed the Power of Judgment in the Right hand neither will it be possible to be taken out of the Wrong nor did any of these Emperors nor shall any else dare do it as long as Bishops continue hired with their own Treasure and Revenue and their own Temporal Sword deliver'd into their hands for Rome and Constantinople to Fight for Supremacy over themselves and to Sentence and Judg them and their Subjects as Rome hath done since it obtain'd Supremacy at their pleasure The Bishop of Rome had at this time got a Bishop at Constantinople placed for his purpose who was content to acknowlege the Supremacy of Judging Heresie to be in the Bishop of Rome or any else if he might be Second and enjoy so Fat an Office as to be Bishop of Constantinople but the City differ'd from their Mercenary Bishop who was call'd Anatolius and disdaining in their Religion to bow to Rome set up Eutyches an Abbot or Archimandrite of Constantinople to publish a Doctrine That Christ had no Humane but only a Divine Nature in him To suppress which Opininion Flavianus a former Bishop of Constantinople had moved the Emperor Theodosius the Second to call a Council at Ephesus Anno. 449. wherein Eutyches was Condemn'd by Flavianus yet by the help of Chrysaphius the Eunuch and Endoxia the Empress who favour'd that opinion Theodosius was prevailed with to make another Synod Judg of this Heresie which was again Summon'd by the Emperors Authority at Ephesus and Dioscorus of Alexandria made President at which Synod Eutyches is again cleared and declared Orthodox and Flavianus opposing it was so upon that Three Days after he died and all this being done in the Council of Ephesus Anno 449. in Theodosius's time was again Repealed and Abrogated Anno 455. in Martianus's time at the Council of Chalcedon And Leo the First Bishop of Rome by the help of Anatolius Bishop of Constantinople and his other Pensioners carried the Day for Supremacy of Judgment and Punishment of Heresie and Anatolius and the See of Constantinople was to be only next in Dignity to the Infallible Chair of Rome Considerations on the Judgment of Heresie when assumed by Bishops according to the Four first General Councils if it make them suspect to be Papists and not sit to be Prayed for in Publick 1. Coke says this Parliament 1. Eliz 1. was doubtful what they ought to determine Heresie and Schism and what not which was as much as the Bishops needed to desire that the Layity might be Ignorant and they have Power to keep them so and Heresie a Quaere to be Judged by themselves pro Arbitrario 2. It appears that the Pious Queen the Dawning of the Reformation but newly entring with her she could not suddenly Dispell the Darkness yet hanging over her own Protestant Party nor the Blacker Clouds gathering from Foreign and Native Papists against her nor resist her own Bishops designing to continue those Privileges of Profit translated by from Rome to Canterbury for certainly if the Protestant Party had understood That the Four first Councils had adjudged all those to be Hereticks who would not Worship Images and had been able to have over-Voted the Popish Party and Bishops they would never have given them Power to Judg Heresie according to those Idolatrous Councils for thereby they might Sentence them and all Protestants that were against Images to the Stake 3. The Bible was but little before Translated into English yet to keep it more dark still than if it had continued in Latine they who alledged themselves Protestant-Bishops sent the People to Learn the same of Greek Councils and to Read there the Law of Heresie while they Judged them at home in their Latine-Law and Latine-Courts the mean while 4. They equal Councils with Canonical Scriptures that their Convocations and Provincial Synods may have the same Authority 5. They equal their Convocation with the King and Parliament for the words of the Statute are or Determined to be Heresie by High Court of Parliament of this Realm with the Assent of the Clergy in their Convocation Knowing if the Miter once get equal 't is but one step more to be above the Crown 6. By those words they Constitute to themselves the Power of a Negative in Legislation against the King in Parliament and the two other Estates which makes them a Fourth Estate in the Legislative Power knowing such Fourth Estate like the Fourth Beast in Daniel may easily Devour all the rest 7. They Judg since no Commissioners were made every Bishop in his Diocess a Judg of Heresie Jure Divino and they by their own Popish Canons and the old Popish Acts against Lollards who were the followers of Wickliff and the Primitive Protestants and the Proto-Martyrs of England Judged Protestancy to be Lollary and Heresie and all the Sheriffs of England take an Oath with all their Power to Destroy all Heresies and Errors commonly call'd Lollaries which is Protestancy and to assist the Bishops in the same whensoever by them Required whereby they have the whole Military Power at their Command to Judg and Destroy Protestants as Hereticks 8. They Judg Heresie by their own Ceremonial Laws and Canons whereby they Arrogate a Power above the Moral Law of God by which alone all Heresies and Schisms and all Error and Truth ought to be Judged I conclude therefore That such Bishops if there are any such as Exercise all these ways of Popery many Protestants may happen to suspect them to be Papists for their profit and therefore scruple to join with their Chaplains in their Prayer before Sermon for God to speed them It will not agree with the Consciences of many Protestants to join with the Chaplain in publick Prayer for his Patron 1. Because all Patronages were invented and erected by the Pope and Papal Laws all Patroage came from the Pope and the Strength and Riches of all Popery consists in Patronages or Power of Presentation to Cathedral Collegiat Parochial or other Religious Churches or Houses 2. It is very unjust that any who must pay the Lawyer or Physician his Fees should not have Election of such a one of either as he can Trust and much more as to a Divine Lawyer and Physician of his Soul that any should be Imposed on him whom he cannot Trust and who may perhaps Poison him in the Sacrament it self of which Examples have been already Cited but the Chaplain who Prays for the Patron is obtruded on the Pay of the Parish without their Assent and the Patron many times pays him not a Penny but Sells to him
a Papist is permitted to be Indicted for Recusancy or Absence from Church a Protestant may on the same Penal Law be Indicted on the same if a Papist is punish'd for Non-Conformity to any other Ceremony a Protestant who as much dissents from that Ceremony as a Papist may be likewise punish'd by the same and a Legem quam tuleras feras be minded against him and the Protestant be brought in a worse Condition than the Papist whencesoever any Bishop Bancroft or Gundamore gets a Pardon of all Penal Laws against the Papist and their Execution sharpen'd against the Dissentient Protestant so if an Excommunicato Capiendo and Confiscation thereon be granted to the Power of the Bishop against the Papist or any Heretick we see by experience it shall not be emitted against the Papist but only against the Non-Conformist Protestant The Compulsion of Papists to Confession of Faith or any External Forms or Ceremonies of Worship by Penalties or any illegal Proceedings which destroy Liberty and Propriety in them cannot be done without bringing the Liberty and Propriety of the Protestant into the same danger as the Penalties by Statutes laid to compell Confession of Faith and a Form of Worship and the illegal proceeding on them or without them of beginning Suits with Original Writs Law Execution Summons before Oblatio Libelli Oblatio Libelli before Oath of Calumny priety of Protestants Exaction of Pledges Bail Mainprize Distresses Condemning before Hearing Judgment before Probation Arrest before Judgment Outlawries and Excommunicato Capiendo's are Penalties and Abuses in the Forms of Judicial Proceeding destructive and impossible to consist with Liberty and Propriety in any Kingdom or State now if any of these are permitted to Invade the Liberty and Propriety of the Papist Tua res agitur as well as his it will be impossible for the Liberty and Propriety of the Protestant to escape such an Invasion suffer'd to break in unless therefore all the said Abuses are utterly Abolish'd as well against the Papist as the Protestant it is never to be hoped that Liberty or Propriety shall be enjoyed by either Compulsion to confession of Faith or Form of Worship causeth Civil Wars It is impossible to prevent Seditions and Civil Wars where there is practised in any Kingdom or State Compulsion of the Natives who are but numerous enough to Raise an Army to any Confession of Faith or Form of Worship by Penalties this Cruelty being practised by Antiochus Epiphanes against the Jews Raised a great Rebellion and Wars against him in that Nation as long as he lived which Rebellion continued after his Death against Antiochus Eupator his Son but the Son advising with wiser Council than his Father had done offer'd the Jews on a Capitulation the Free Liberty of enjoying their own Religion which granted they immediately agreed and concluded a Peace with the King Lysias his General after the Peace concluded Councell'd Antiochus to put Menelaus the High-Priest to Death as the Evil Councellour who had been the occasion of that Rebellion and War by giving such wicked Councel to his Father to compell the Jews to forsake their Rellgion and the King understanding it sent Menelaus unto Beraea a City in Syria and Commanded him there to be put to Death he having before his being sent thither been High-Priest for the space of Ten Years and made Alcimus High-Priest in his place where appears that to Councel a King to compell a Nation to a Form of Worship contrary to their Conscience tends only to the Advancement of Episcopal and not of Regal Interest and the Kings Person is exposed to the hazard of the Battel while the Bishop Luxuriates in the delights of his Pallace Episcopal Councels unsortunate to Kings and why and this Evil Episcopal Councel to compell the People to his Confession of Faith and Forms of Worship hath not only been unfortunate to antiochus but to all Kings and Emperors who have trusted on the Staff of so bruised a Reed as a Crosyer on which when they have leaned a while in the end it will go into their hands and pierce them for the Episcopal advice of Compulsion to Forms and Ceremonies makes a Rich Bishop but a Poor King and People and the Interest Regal and Episcopal and the Law of the Crown and of the Canon being Diametrically opposite one to another it is no wonder if the Councils of the later level always at its own Supremacy and the Subjection of the former such was the Episcopal Council of the Bishop of Rome and Spanish Bishops to Philip the Second of Spain for they Councell'd him to break his Oath to his Subjects of the Netherlands whereby he had bound himself not to increase their ancient number of Bishops being but Three to which he notwithstanding contrary to his Oath added Fourteen which no man doubts was highly for the Interest of the new Bishops and Bishop of Rome but every man may see was clean contrary and destructive to the King's Interest so they councell'd him to bring in the Inquisition amongst them to cut off the Heads of the Protestant Nobles to Massacre the Protestant People all tending to the Advance of the Romish Episcopal Tyranny but Destructive to Regal Government and what was the Success of these Episcopal Councels and Benedictions of Perjury and shedding of Blood the whole Power of Spain with all their European and American Dominions were thereby disabled to reduce so small a Spot as the United parts of the Netherlands and with infinite Losses and Dishonour beaten thence and lost the Government ever since Such Councels gave the Romish and German Bishops to the Emperors both in the time of Luther and the Wars then as likewise in those later Wars both in Germany and Hungary to compell with Fire and Sword the Protestants to the Episcopal Forms and Ceremonies highly no doubt to the Episcopal Interest but Destructive to the Imperial and what was the Success God hath been pleased to make the Protestants stronger and stronger and the Emperors weaker and weaker ever since Charles the Fifth in whose time those Wars began and both he and his Successors have been still compell'd before the Wars ended to which they were set on by the Bishops Dishonourably and with Loss to condiscend to a Free Exercise of Faith and Religion which is more than a Non-Compulsion to Confelsion of Faith and Form of Worship which they might have Honourably and before any Damage and Devastation to them or their Countrey have Granted and would have been at first Honourably accepted So in the Peace concluded between the Emperor and his Discontented Subjects in the Higher Hungary Anno Dom. 1606. The first Article agreed on was That from theneforth it should be lawful for every man through the Kingdom of Hungary to have the free Exercise of his Religion and to believe what be would and had not the Emperor been misguided by Episcopal Councils to the contrary he might with more Honour
and less Damage to himself and Subjects have prevented those Intestine Dissensions by not taking from them that Liberty of Conscience as to Faith and Form of Worship which he was compell'd at last to give them it being certain that the Bordering Turk by the Imprudence of divers of the Emperors in being blinded by the Romish Bishops and their own to violate the Liberty of Conscience of those Frontier Countries and thereby dividing and disuniting them against the Common Enemy he hath thereof taken great advantages to the great danger of the Emperors themselves the Empire and the rest of Christendom And how unfortunate were Episcopal Councils in our own Countrey in this point of Compulsion of the Conscience to their Faith Forms and Ceremonies tending to Episcopal and not the Regal Interest and how they thereby exposed his late Majesty a Valiant Wise and Pious King and his Three Kingdoms to an unnecessary War and the miserable loss ensued thereby is yet in Bleeding Memory What Wars have been in France by Compulsion of Conscience by Force and destroying it by Perfidious Treacheries of Episcopal Councils is likewise sadly known so that in all the Kingdoms of Christendom Bishops by this Compulsion to their Faith Forms and Ceremonies have one time or other raised Civil Wars and Dissensions dangerous or destructive to Princes and People and shared thereby the Spoils of both or what was a greater Prey got by our own made Sale of all the Estates of the Revenues of the Bishopricks fallen Twenty Years before they ever made a Sermon in their Church or Served at their Altar so though the Wars were by themselves occasion'd and kindled and were an universal loss to the People yet they lost nothing and gain'd all That Compulsion against Conscience causeth Wars doth likewise agree the Learned and Pious Doctor More who saith Denial of Liberty of Conscience brings upon Nations and Families Wars Bloodshed Subversion of Families Deposing Stabbing Poisoning of Princes perpetual Hatred and Enmity amongst men and all the Works and Actions of the Kindom of Darkness whereas if it were universally acknowledged that Liberty of Religion were the Right of Mankind all these mischiefs would be prevented the Prince could not pretend any Quarrel against the People nor the People against the Prince or against one another except for Civil Rights which are more plain and intelligible That Compulsion to Faith or Forms of Worship hath had the same Destructive Effects against the Eastern Emperors likewise which it hath had against the Western appears by the Example of Michael Palaeologus Emperor of Greece who fearing an Invasion from the Turks and other Foreigners from the East endeavour'd to strengthen himself from the Pope and by him with the Emperor and other Christian Kings from the West and by his Ambassadors to that end treated with Gregory the Tenth then Pope of Rome to Unite and Conform the Greek Church to the Latine and to acknowledg the Popes Supremacy over the Greeks and Liberty of Appeal from them to the Court of Rome which the Emperor offer'd and the Pope gladly accepted of but the People generally abhor'd these Proceedings of the Emperor and were so Tumultuous that the Emperor was fain to leave off the care of the Foreign Dangers to look to these greater at home and told the People to quiet them that this Alteration was made not out of any good liking he had to it but in respect of the dangerous Estate of things in that juncture of Time it behoved Prudence to admit the less Evil to avoid the greater for if by not granting the Latine Church what they would have they would take advantage of the Wars they had with their other Enemies and fall on them at the same time whereby they would attain more by force from them than would satisfie them by Treaty and not only by War become Lords of their Religion and Ceremonies but of all at once their Wives Children Estates and Lives at the will of the Conqueror therefore he required them to yield to necessity and not to compell him to use more Severe Remedies and not finding them pliable some he Imprison'd some Banish'd some Confiscated some pull'd out their Eyes some Tortur'd some Dismembred on which some outwardly Conformed but not in their hearts but the greater part fled some to Thrace some to Achaia some to Peloponesus and other Countries and the Emperor trusting to Foreign Forces whom he joined and this and his other Cruel Practices in denying his Subjects Liberty of Conscience seeing they were put to Fight only to confirm their own Slavery so discouraged the Greek Army that the Turks overthrew them and their Emperor and won the day by which they got their first Footing in Europe Whereby appears That as Compulsion to the Faith and Ceremonies of the Bishop of Rome and denial of Liberty of Conscience to the first Arrian Christians was the cause of the great Conquests of Mahomet who gave them Toleration in Asia which they could not have of the Roman Emperors so this denial of Liberty of Conscience by this Greek Emperor and his Compulsion of his Subjects to the Ceremonies of the Bishop of Rome was the first opening an Entrance to the Turk into Europe and after the losing of the Grecian Empire to him whence so many Fatal Miseries have ensued to Christendom By the Interruption of the Press I am compell'd to break off this Book abruptly
is manifest that the Canon of the Council of Trent which nulls all Marriages except before a Priest in a Temple and the Certificates of Bishops and Penance gives a general License for Money either the Taxa Camerae of the Pope or the Commutation Money of the Bishops to have all Women common for by decreeing no Marriages shall be of Validity except with a Woman brought before a Priest and a Temple they null and dissolve all Marriages made by the Moral Law of God and the Obligations of them whereby if any man lie with an Hundred Women and get them with Child if he hath been so cunning as not to lead any of them to a Priest in a Temple there is no obligation on him to own any of these for Wife or Child in regard the Moral Law of God is abolish'd by the Papal and Episcopal Canons and made of no effect by their Traditions and wicked Customs and the Party is left free to lie with as many more and to have common amongst them Sans nombre if he will but give them Money for their Hire and the Bishop Commutation Money and what is this but to have Women common to the Rich and to exclude the Poor who have not Money from having any But this would be prevented if the Bishops would as they ought to do compel the man who gets a Virgin with-Child to marry her according to the Moral Law of God and the express Precept of Scripture Exod. 22.16 If a man entice a Maid who is not betrothed he shall surely endow her to be his Wife Which enticement is as well intended by Money as Wantonness and the Law the same as well in case of Force or Rape as enticement but more Penal Deut. 22.28 If a man find a Damsel that is a Virgin which is not betrothed and lay hold on her and lie with her and they be found then the man that lay with her shall give the Virgins Father Fifty Sheckels of Silver and she shall be his Wife because he hath humbled her he may not put her away all his days This is the clear Moral Law of God and the clear Texts of Scripture and there is by them laid an indissoluble obligation on the man according to the old Form of Espousal Se post Concubitum invitam non deserturum and if there is a Child born by reason of the further Obligation of Parents laid on them by the manifest Act of God it is not in the Power of these Virgins who are now become Mothers will they nill they nor of any human Power to dissolve that which the Divine Power by giving birth to a Child hath once established But Popes and Bishops are so far from compelling these deflowrers of Virgins to Marry then and these begetters of Children to acknowledg them according to this most clear and just Law of God and according to the Obligations both Ex Contractu Reali which are the lying with them and getting them with-Child and Ex Malesicio Reali which are the same that they like the Giants who would storm Heaven Oh Hellish presumption Level all the Canons they have against the Divine Laws of God himself and with them tear in pieces all Obligations laid by them of Husbands to Wives and Fathers to Children that Women may be in common and Children in common Nullius Filii Populi Filii confounding Heaven and Earth and all Divine and Human Rights and subverting the course of Nature as far as they are able to obtain to themselves the inexhaustible Treasure and invincible Power over Princes and People over Emperors and Kings incident to the Jurisdiction of Marriage Filiation and Succession But how easily are these Giants quell'd and all the mischiefs ensue by their letting the World loose to Community of Women and Community of Children 1. 'T is but to give liberty to those who Marry to Marry according to the Moral Law of God and to free them from compulsion to the Ceremonial Law of a Priest in a Temple 2. 'T is but to give Power to the Temporal Judges and Magistrates to compel such as have had Children by Virgins and desert them to acknowledg those Virgins according to the clear Texts of Scripture to be their Wives and not to leave them and their Children in common which ought to be their inclosed Propriety Whence would ensue that if any man saw that whatsoever Virgin he did first touch he should be compell'd to take he would follow the Poets Counsel Multis è millibus unam Elige cui dicas tu mihi sola places Ovid. He would certainly choose unless corrupted by Money one whom he liked above all others and having so fair a Garden inclosed of his own choice he would be the more unlikely to run to graze in a Common or if be should he might find his expectation much deceiv'd for the same Justice having been done by the Magistrate on all others as well as himself he would find no Common to run in but every Quillet inclosed nor should a single Woman be let would she take him where another had Right to claim him As to Fornication Adultery Stews Brothels how great a cause the compulsion of Publick Appearance in Marriage before a Priest in a Temple by prohibition of Private Marriage is the same is shewn already before P. 107 and as to the dissemination by Fornication Adultery Stews and Brothels not only of that miserabile scortorum flagellum the Lues Venerea the inseparable concomitant of those Vices and Places but likewise of all other Epidemical contagious and deadly Diseases amongst the People the same is notorious but Episcopal Courts get as much by the Dead as the Living and more by the Vicious than Vertuous It is their Interest therefore to continue it so long as they can It will be objected against the giving Power to Temporal Magistrates to compel every Man who hath a Child or Children by a Virgin to acknowledg her for his Wife and her Children his on Probation made of the Fact that 't is impossible if Marriages are tolerated without a Priest in a Temple or a Justice of Peace in his Hall or Banns at the Church or Market-Cross to have Witnesses or any other Testimony or Evidence of the Fact unless the Magistrate should give Sentence as the Bishop doth without Probation To which is answer'd First That Toleration of Private Marriage without Publick Witness of Priest or Magistrate is no denial of liberty to those who desire Publick Witness of their Contracts of Marriage no more than the Toleration of passing Lands by Livery and Seisin in Pays is a denial to pass them by Fines and Recoveries or other matter of Record which is publick Testimony but Parties may use one or the other or both as they desire and think suits best with their Conveniences but that which is here press'd is that no Mans Christian Liberty be infringed nor he be compell'd to make publick Witnesses either of
Priest or Magistrate but be left free where God hath not prohibited him to do as best suits with his own Conscience and Convenience without unjust Penalties laid on himself his Wife or his Children for omission of a Ceremony never instituted by God but full of great danger and mischief to many though not to all whose Consciences and Conveniences are not alike but of different States as is already before shewn P. 108. especially between Poor and Rich for the Poor need neither Writing nor Witnesses for Portions or Jointures as perhaps the Rich think themselves to need Secondly Parties that desire Witnesses may no question have better Witnesses at their own Home in Private and with less inconvenience as well for Contract of Marriage as they have for all other Civil Contracts than a Priest in a Temple or Justice of Peace in his Hall or Bishop in his Cathedral or ony other Publick Officer whatsoever and one of the Jews ways which was never question'd but lawful and convenient was to Marry by written Instruments of Contract without Priest or Temple Thirdly Though Parties that Marry have neither Witness Publick or Private yet they have Power if they can Write to give a Note in Writing one to another or if they cannot to give such secret Tokens or Pledges as without Witnesses will be sufficient to evidence their secret Congresses when their happens any necessity as Judah when he went in to Tamar his Daughter in Law Gen. 38.18 He said What Pledg shall I give thee and she said Thy Signet and thy Bracelers and thy Staff that is in thy hand and he gave it her and came in unto her and she Conceived by him and after being accused of Whoredom Verse 25. When she was brought forth she sent to her Father in Law saying by the Man whose these are am I with-Child and she said discern I pray thee whose these are the Signet and Bracelets and Staff and Judah acknowledged them Fourthly If the Law were made as it ought to be That Private Marriage without Witness and Procreation of a Child between two Persons not prohibited by the Law of God to Marry should be a Civil Act Sine poena aut infamia and not a Criminal as it is unjustly made in the Bishops Courts if done without their Ceremonies of a Priest in a Temple the Proceeding of a Temporal Judg would be then Legal and according to the ordinary course of Justice if a Woman came before him and first took her Oath that such a man had her Virginity and that the Child she hath is his Child to put the man to his Oath concerning the same for this is then no Oath Ex Officio nor Self-accusation of a Crime when the Fact is made no Crime and is no other than like an Oath of discovery of a Civil Contract in Chancery or Wager of Law of No Debt or Non-Summons at Common Law and only gives the Woman and her Child the Civil Benefit to be in as good a State and Condition as if she had been Married by the Ceremony of a Priest in a Temple and no farther and this without Penalty to the Father who being put to his Oath if he deny not what is alledged against him nothing is more just than that he should be compell'd if he refuse to acknowledg the Woman to be his Wife and the Child his Child Fifthly when once it were known that the Magistrate had a Legal Power to perform this he would be rarely troubled concerning any secret Marriage but every man concerned in the same will be careful so much the more to perform the duty both of an Husband and Father in a Secret than a Publick Marriage by how much the more he desires to keep it secret 10. It causeth Prostitutions of Brides to Priests Lords Guests and others Examples of this in Priests are before shewn P. 53 54. of Lords P. 24 25. Sabellicus reports of the like Custom amongst the old Carthaginians the like was amongst the ancient Scots Persians Vri Swiss under-Waldensians Moors and others all which wicked Customs had been easily prevented and avoided had not the People been compell'd to Marry by the Publick Ceremony of a Priest and a Temple 11. It caused the Consecration of Incest Whores and Sodomites to attend the Service of the Priests and Temples The way of Consecration of the Persian Magi by lying with their Mothers Sisters and Daughters is before toucht P. 44. and the way Pope Alexander obtained his Holiness seems not much to differ from the Magi by the Epitaph of his Saint Hoc jacet in tumulo Lucretia nomine sed re Thais Alexandri Filia Sponsa nurus The Consecration of Whores and Sodomites whom the Priests let to hire in the Temples and Groves for their gain was so common amongst the old Pagan Nations that the Jews made Use of the word signifying a Person Consecrated to signifie a Whore and a Sodomite as the Hebrew word Kadash Jos 2.1 is translated in English Harlot and Rahab is so called and 1 Kings 14.24 the same is translated Sodomite yea at this day the Devil under the name of Holiness so much possesses the American Priests of Pegu that they keep in the Temples Consecrated Sodomites to make gains of them to the Priest who are esteemed by the People most Sacred Oh to what height of wickedness doth the Devil draw people where he makes the Priest his Instrument to counterfeit Holiness with their Ceremonious Fopperies of Consecration and bring the same into a Temple with the Name and Doctrine of being Sacred The same was done amongst the Greeks a wise Nation and by a wise Legislator of theirs even Solon himself yet did the Devil and Priest delude him under the name of Holiness for he caused by his Laws as a Fundamental of Government to begin his Magna Charta with the Privileges of the Holy Church and to that end he appoints a Temple to be Dedicated to Venus and Priests to be Consecrated and Sacrifices instituted and to be well govern'd by the Priests he stocked the Temple with a multitude of Consecrated Whores to be let to hire to increase the Priests Profit and Pleasure and this Holy Church he endowed with great Revenues and Privileges There were the like Holy Churches filled with the like Holy Sisters at Ephesus at Corinth and Abydos and so great veneration they were in amongst the People no doubt by the many pious Sermons of the Priests what Miracles these Female Angels could do that they attributed the whole overthrow of Xerxes with his almost innumerable Army to the Holy Prayers of these Consecrated Whores in their Temples or Stews to their Goddess Venus Here Whoredom for the gains of the Priests and Temples is Consecrated and believed not only by the grosser sort of People but by the chief Princes and Governour to be a Thing most Sacred And is not Adultery with us more wickedly than Fornication amongst the Heathen Consecrated by
Free-born Subject Arbitrarily at their pleasure is contrary to the Acts of Parliament both of Magna Charta and the Petition of Right so late in memory which abolish all Imprisonment both of Nobles and Commons without the lawful Judgment of their Peers so likewise is it contrary to all other Fundamental Laws of the Land made for defence of the liberty of the People which is more necessary and more dear than Life as may appear by the Reasons following 1. There is an Act of Parliament made 15. H. 6. cap. 4. That none shall Sue a Subpoena until he find Surety to satisfie the Defendant his Damages if he do not verifie and prove his Bill to be true this Statute had nipt in the Bud the Overflow of all those innumerable Fictions and Falsities which have since followed in the Suggestions of Bills in Chancery for this being made 15. H. 6. there is no mention made in all the Year-Books of any quarrel between the Common-Law-Judges and a Subpoena till 37. H. 6. which is above Twenty Years after so great a Fright had this Act falling from the Supreme Power put amongst the Froggs though now despised as a dead Logg as likewise are all the rest and it is in vain to make more unless the Honour of these is vindicated by the same Authority that made them for Chancellors as if Jura negant sibi nata they were two-great to be bound by Acts of Parliament though they have not the least pretence to colour their Authority against these Three the greatest Acts for Security of the Subjects against false Imprisonments that ever were made in England for there is no Prescription or Custom of any Court can be alledged against an Act of Parliament be it never so old and there is no Pretence to alledg any against the Petition of Right Chancellour hath no Authority to impose a Fine being in so fresh memory and no longer since than 3. Car. 1. they have trampled under soot the Authority of these Supreme Acts and all lawful Judgments on them 1. To lay Fines on the Subject thus Trin. 3. Jac. did Chancellour Egerton impose a Fine on Sir Thomas Themilthorp for not performing his Decree concerning Land of Inheritance and Estreated the same into the Exchequer and upon Process against him the Party appearing pleaded that the Chancellour had no Authority to impose a Fine the Attorney General Petiit advisamentum Curiae concerning the Authority of the Chancellour and on mature advice It was adjudged That he had no Power to Fine in the Case Coke 4th part 84. 2. To Extend according to which pretended Power the said Chancellour Decreed against Waller certain Lands and for not obeying the Decree imposed a Fine and upon Process out of the Court of Chancery extended the Lands that Waller had in Middlesex whereupon Waller brought his Assise in the Court of Common-Pleas where the Opinion of the whole Court agreed in omnibus with the Court of the Exchequer ib. 3. Not only to proceed to Imprison the Subjects on false Suggestions without taking any Surety of the Complainant according to the Statute to verifie his Bill but without so much as taking his Oath of Calumny to his Bill and have further presumed so high as by their Edicts and Orders of Chancery which they have not the least Authority to make to order the Subjects to be Attached and Imprison'd on every Affidavit of any Knight of the Post and no Probation to be admitted to the contrary and if while the Innocent Party is imprison'd being remote from his Home and suffering great Loss and Damage by this his false Imprisonment he shall at length offer to prove the Affidavit false and Knight of the Post perjur'd he shall be discharged but without any Cost for the great Service the Knight of the Post did the Court to Forswear himself against the Prisoner whereby they get some Fees See here a Chancellour in desiance of Three Acts of Parliament without any Sureties without any Oath of Calumny without any Judgment of Peers publisheth in sight of the Sun his abominable Orders to cast into Prison the most Innocent Person on the false Affidavit of every Perjur'd Knight of the Post yea a single Affidavit as appears by the Orders of the Chancellour and Master of the Rolls Printed 1669. Page 67. and yet they pretend Page 65. under the Title of Commitment that they are tender of the Liberty of mens Persons and of their Imprisonments on Affidavits and confess they are often Malitious and made by one mean and ignorant Person yet in the same breath Page 67. as if they soon forgot or understood not what they said in the beginning of their Order they the next leaf conclude That a single Affidavit of such a malitious mean and ignorant Person yea though he is proved afterwards to be Perjured shall be sufficient to Imprison the Innocent Subject and when he again gets out of Gaol if he can let the Innocent Party be indamaged his whole Estate he shall not have a Farthing Cost for the false Imprisonment and observe the depth of the Reason why given by a Chancellour and as the Printed Orders say with advice and assistance of the Master of the Bolls 't is this as appears Page 68. at the top of the leaf viz. IN RESPECT OF THE OATH MADE AGAINST HIM AS AFORESAID that is to say the Oath though false of a Villain Perjured against the Innocent Person for so is the implication of the Order and likewise though they durst not say so in express terms yet so is the implicit Non Obstante notwithstanding any Law of God or Man or Acts of Parliament to the contrary Doth not here a Chancellour assume the Omnipotent Power of the Pope to dispense with the Laws of God and Men and assume a Power of Imprisoning the Subjects above the King and Parliament yea contrary and in contempt of their Laws he doth for the Law of God and Precept of Christ is known to prohibit the Imprisonment of any No Imprisonment ought to be but where the Witnesses and Party are brought Face to Face without two Witnesses at least and without bringing the Witnesses and the Party accused face to face that he may know them and except against their Persons or Testimony if he hath cause which is never done on an Affidavit And the Laws of the Land Magna Charta and Petition of Right utterly prohibit all Imprisonment of the Subject on Affidavits whether they are true or false without bringing the Witnesses and the Party face to face and a Judgment on such Testimony against him by his Peers and if such Evil Precedents be suffer'd to pass without some example of Justice shewn on them all Acts of Parliament which ever have been or shall be for protection of the Liberty of the Subject Forgery Licensed in Chancery thereby to Imprison the Subject falsely will be vain and to no purpose 4. The Chancellour
in the said Chancery-Orders Printed 1669. presumes to do in the Court of Conscience what was never heard of to be done in the Courts of Turks Infidels or the most Barbarous Judicatories in the World for he is not ashamed publickly to give License to Cursitors and their Clerks to commit Crimen Falsi which we call Forgery by Antedating Writs taking them out of Returns past or of a former Term by reason of which Forgery of Writs and Forgery of Returns Antedated Capiases Proclamations Exigends and Outlawries Antedated have been likewise Forged and Thousands of Poor men unjustly cast in Goals and miserably undone without any Summons or Hearing and these are likewise the damnable effects of the Chancellours Writs by which as by others the Plaintiffs so here the Defendants are destroyed without Hearing and certainly these Crimes of Antedating and Forgery of Judicial Acts though here Licensed by Orders of Chancellors and Protected by Courts by not Licensing Averments against them are by the Civil Law and Laws of Scotland and of many other Nations both of these and Instruments Death and even by our own the imbeselling of a Record by a Clerk and Counterfeiting of Fines is Felony and if the second time so is the Forgery of Deeds Writings and Court-Rolls and deservedly the Offender better deserving death than a Robber on a High-way and why any Crimes of this Nature should be publickly Licensed to the Ruin of all Truth and Justice by any Chancellour in his Chancery Orders is very strange the mischievous effects of which said Attachments on Affidavit and Antedating Writs and Forgery of Outlawries are notoriously known and not complained of here without good Cause and Testimony and some particular experience of my own to my loss who have as well as others suffer'd in an high degree by the false Affidavit of a Fellow who Subscribed and Swore it by a false name and not his own and likewise procured a Forged Outlawry antedated against me It belongs not to a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity in England 5. It belongs not to the Chancellours Office to be a Judg of Equity or to make Orders Edicts Laws or Writs and thereby to Imprison the Persons and dispose of the Lands and Goods of the Subjects Arbitrarily and at his Pleasure Coke 4. part 82. saith That all Statutes which give Authority to the Chancellour to determin Offences in Chancery are to be intended only in the Ordinary Court there which proceeds in Latine and is Secundum Legem c. and not in any Extraordinary Court which proceeds in English Secundum Aequum bonum and 37. H. 6.14 27. H. 8.18 it is Resolved That the Court of Chancery Proceeding by English Bill is no Court of Record and therefore it cannot bind either the State of the Subjects Lands or the Property of his Goods or Chattels and therefore they there admit he may Imprison the Person Chancellour cannot bind the Subject's Goods not Persons which is not only a Non sequitur but a contrary conclusion follows on it for if he cannot bind the Subjects Goods à Fortiori he cannot bind his Person For the Life is more than Meat and the Body is more than Raiment Luke 12.23 And though those Common Law Judge of H. 6. and H. 8. so sordidly deliver'd the Subject Prisoner to the Chancellour so as they might keep his Lands and Goods to themselves yet had they no more Law or Right to do it than they had to deliver him Prisoner to the Turks or to send him to the Barbado's for the Subject is no Slave neither ought he to be given or sold for one without his own Assent by his Representative in Parliament and having so good a Protection against the Chancellours and Common Law Judges and the Orders and Writs of both as Magna Charta and the Petition of Right both for his Lands Goods and Person they ought to shew some greater Laws than their Writs and Orders of Courts or Forgeries of Clerks before they presume to invade either 6. There being no Law in England which ever Ordained a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity or to make Edicts or Orders concerning the same he can pretend no Title thereto unless from the Laws of France and to that effect Polydor Virgil saith The Chancery came in with the Conquest to which though my Lord Coke saith Perperam Erravit because the Mirror saith The Constitutions of the ancient Kings were that every one should have out of the Chancery of the King a Writ Remedial for his Flaint without difficulty yet he himself seems to be in the Error and not Polydore for though the name of Chancellour and Chancery was before the Conquest and divers other Countries use the name of Chancellour as well as England yet the greatest part of the Writs came from Normandy and are mention'd in their Customary as who will peruse it shall find but as to the Writ of Subpoena Centum librarum and Arbitrary Power of the Chancellour and to be a Judg of Equity came first from the Conquest and was never used before nor did it belong to the Chancellour's Office either of England or Scotland that having other employment and more than a Chancellour could do though he never troubled himself with Judgment but left the same to the Judges to whom the King Delegated the cause by Writ and this the very name of Chancellour testifieth who was Originally no other than a Master of Requests to the Prince whom he served and on Petitions deliver'd to him by the Subjects if unfit to be Granted he strook cross lines over them like Cancelli or Lettices by which he Cancell'd them and thence had his name of the Canceller or Chancellour as Turn lib. 11. advers c. 25. and not according to that Fictitious Verse of his Power Hic est qui Leges Regni Cancellat iniquas For when was ever any Chancellour in England allowed to Cancel any Roll or Act of Parliament And when these Petitions for Justice were deliver'd by the People to this Master of Requests call'd the Canceller of such of them as were Evil such as were Just he Cancelld not but on behalf of the Petitioner Granted the Princes Rescript or Warrant to the Praeses Provinciae where the cause of Action arose or the Defendant lived for Actor Sequitur Forum Rei which Rescript or Warrant we now call a Writ containing in it self 1. A Questus est nobis a short recital of the Complaint 2. Si A. fecerit te securum a taking Security or Pledges of the Plaintiff de Prosequendo 3. A Summoneas or Summons of the Defendant to appear before the Prince himself or such Judges as he Delegated though out of the Province or County where he lived which was the Reason of taking Pledges of the Plaintiff because he made the Defendant appear many times Hundreds of Miles from his Home when he might in those days implead him before the President