Frustrà fit per plura quod aequè benè potest fieri per pauciora There 's no need of reall satisfaction 2. Faith imputed doth well bear the sense of the object that faith layes hold on as our righteousnesse Rom. 3.21 Now the righteousnsse of God without the Law is manifested What righteousnesse of God ver 22. Even the righteousness of God through faith of Jesus Christ unto all Now if the righteousnesse of God is manifested without one Law to wit of works why not without another Law of faith and of inherent Gospel-righteousnesse And what need that Christ should die if the act of beleeving should be that precious righteousnesse of God and that according to the Law of faith This by the way As hope is put for the object hoped for As Rom. 8.24 Hope that is seen is not hope that is the thing possessed the salvation which we have in present possession is not hoped for Col. 1.5 For the hops sake laid up in heaven that is the thing hoped for For the grace of hope is not laid up in heaven ver 27. Christ in you the hope of glory So faith here put for the thing beleeved so saith the Martyr my love is crucified that is Christ my loved or beleeved one is crucified So by faith in his name is this man made whole It were strange to say by faith and repentance and mortification is this man made whole And it must be said if so be that faith includes repentance Now Peter denies Acts 3.12 this why marvail ye as if we by our power and holinesse had made this man to walk It s not our holinesse but Jesus Christ hath done it even God the God of Abraham c. ver 13. hath done it And yet ver 16. faith in his Name hath made him strong That is faith or beleeving in his Name that is in his Power Authority God-head hath made him strong Ergo faith is put for the thing or righteousnesse beleeved So Heb. 11. By faith the walls of Jericho fell that is by love the soul and form of faith say Papists and by repentance and new obedience which is all one with faith say Socinians the walls of Jericho fell So by faith they subdued Kingdomes stopped the mouths of Lions What influence reall or physicall had faith in slaying men in refraining the hungry Lions to eat Daniel None at all But thus the mighty God beleeved in by these men subdued Kingdomes stopped the mouths of Lions if it be replyed there is not alike reason of justifying faith which is dead as touching the influence and causality to justifie as there is of the faith of miracles in these points it is replyed there is every way the same reason For as Abrahams dead faith if it had been dead could no more have justified and saved him then the hypocrites dead faith can save and justifie him as James saith 2.14 15 16 c. So could not these worthies recorded Heb. 11. have casten down the walls of Jericho subdued Kingdomes stopped the mouths of Lions by faith if that faith had been as dead in its nature as the faith of the vain Gnostick and Hypocrite who saith to the brother oâ— sister naked depart in peace be thou warmed and filled and yet gives him not these things that are needfull to the body Jam. 2.15 16. And this we must say except we admit that the fancied faith of the Hypocrite can remove mountains nor is it place to dispute whether Reprobates as Judas have saving faith in working miracles it is sure their faith of miracles cannot be a Hypocriticall faith such as is Iames 2.14 15 16. 3. The Scripture differenceth between faith and love and faith and repentance As 1. we are not once said to be justified by faith but are never said to be justified by love repentance almes deeds It s easie with an active ingine to labour to prove how faith includes love And so doth hope and love include many other works and gifts of the Spirit but the Holy Ghost distinguisheth them As 2. by faith as from a saving principle Abraham sojourned in the Land by faith Noah builded an Ark Iacob blessed the sons of Ioseph Moses would not be called the Son of Pharaohs daughter yet to build an Ark is not to beleeve in God we pray in faith hear in faith yet these are not the same 3. Mar. 1.15 Repent and beleeve Act. 20.21 Testifying repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Iesus Heb. 6.1 Not laying the foundation of repentance from dead works and faith toward God 1 Tim. 1.5 Love and a good conscience and faith unfained Phil. 5. Love and faith 1 Thes. 1.3 We thank God remembring your work of faith and labour of love Heb. 6.10 Labour of love 11. The full assurance of hope 12. Faith and patience We beleeve in Christ but do we repent in Christ 4. Faith is a leaning on God Isa. 10.20 Isa. 26.3 Isa. 50.10 love is not so Faith is a coming to God by way of affiance Ioh. 5.40 Matth. 11.28 Ioh. 6.37 a receiving of Christ Ioh. 1.11 an eating of his flesh and drinking of his blood Ioh. 6.54 55 56. not any of these can be said of love of repentance of new obedience 4. If to beleeve in Christ as Lord and Law-giver be formally for effectively and practically we may with that Learned and Pious D. Prestoun say it is a consenting to Christs Dominion and Government over us to obey him though to consent at the Corronation and to swear an oath of loyaltie to a King be widely different from obeying his Laws as unbeleef is a rebellion against his Government Luk. 19.17 then well may Adam in the Covenant of Works be said to be justified and saved by faith for if to beleeve in God Redeemer be to give our selves to obey him as Lord Redeemer and if this surrendering be the obedience of works by which we are justified and saved and perfectly righteous before God upon the same reason to beleeve in God Law-giver and Creator in the Covenant of Works and for Adam to surrender himself Covenant wayes by a legall faith shall be the Law obedience of works by which Adam is justified and saved and so he is saved by Law-faith as we are by Gospel-faith And this is to be remembred that for one to give himself to Christ as his Lord to be governed and commanded and to be willing to obey him is neither formally faith though it may be conjoined with beleeving nor obedience but an intention or purpose to obey And 1. shall we then be justified by works that is by a purpose and intention to work 2. There are in us May resolutions and purposes like May blossomes that wither before Harvest as some are willing but not obedient Isa. 1.19 One saith he will go work in his fathers Vineyard it may be he purposes to work but yet he works not Mat. 21.30 nor is a practicâ—ll
suitable to mans intire nature to love God yet to love him so and so by obeying the command of not eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge and some other Commands is not so connaturall but God might have commanded the contrair without any thing done contrair to mans nature Yet from this it followes no more that these are two Covenants then that there be two Covenants of Grace Because faith in God and the Morall Law in an Evangelick way are therein commanded and also some duties touching the seals by a positive Law are therein contained CHAP. VII It s not written in the heart of man by nature that GOD should promise life eternall to man upon condition of obedience 2. And that the debt of Justice can not tye GOD. 3. GOD punisheth not sin by necessity of nature 4. Nor defends he his own declarative Glory by that necessity 5. Nothing can be given to GOD Al-sufficient 6. No meriting of the creature 7. We should have humble thoughts of free-Grace 8. How low thoughts of our selves 9. Promises make no strict justice between GOD and us SUre it is not repugnant to the yet innocent and intire nature of man to know that God may reward all such as seek and serve him but that he must reward obedience either in the generall or so and so is neither written in mans heart nor hath it any truth For it were nothing against justice or bounty or any attribute of God not to reward his creature which is obliged to serve him and though there be a sort of quietnesse of conscience which is the naturall result of obedience in Adam and of all men yet it cannot inferre that there is an intrinsecall connexion ex naturâ rei between our obedience and a reward to be given of God Therefore nor will it be a good inference because there is disquietnesse in the conscience after sin and that it is naturall to a sinner to apprehend a revenging power pursuing sin committed that therefore it is naturall anâ— essentiall to the Lord to pursue sin with punishment in generall For a naturall conscience may and does know that God doth freely create the world and that he might not have created it that he doth good freely to his creatures and that he is not a debtor to his creatures Will it follow by any Logick that God creates the world by any naturall obligation And because by force of a naturall conscience all know that God is good and bountâ—full to his creatures in giving and doing good to them we cannot therefore infer that actuall beneficence is so essentiall to the infinite Majesty as he should not be God if he did not extend that goodnesse to them Common sense will say no more followeth but goodnesse and bounty intrinsecall are essentiall to God and these attributes are essentiall to him and were from eternity in him and are his good and bountifull nature Though not either man Angel or any thing else had been created to which he doth actually extend his goodnesse Ergo this actuall extension of goodnesse is not essentiall to God so neither is the actuall punishing of sin essentiall to God but free though Adam apprehended God would punish his eating of the forbidden tree Yet if he apprehended that he should not be God if he did not punish it his apprehension was erroneous And this only followes that there is an intrinsecall and internall Justice in God naturall and essentiall in God but so that the out-goings of his Justice the egressions are most free and that is said by some without all reason because the apprehensions we have naturally of God that he punisheth sin Vniversales apprehensiones nequaquam sunt eorum quae Deo vel adesse vel abesse possunt pro liberrimâ voluntate Universall apprehensions therefore they are not apprehensions of such things as may be or not be in God according to his free pleasure if the apprehensions of Gods doing good to Angels to men to all his creatures freely be in all by nature and cannot be rooted out and be universall then these apprehensions cannot be of such things as are in God according to his most free will and may be in the Almighty or not be in him But the conclusion hath neither reason nor sense for there are universall apprehensions in all men and they canot be rooted out that God does good to Angels men and creatures freely Ergo by this Logick the doing of good freely to Angels men and creatures is not a thing that is in God according to his free-will and may be in the Almighty or not in him Then the so doing must be in God essentially 2. Then must God not be God if he do not good freely to them 3. Then must God not be God except he create men Angels and creatures 4. But since he is God everlasting he must from everlasting have created men Angels and the creatures and from everlasting he must punish sin Life may be considered 1. As life 2. As such an excellent life to wit a communion with God In the former consideration life is either considered as the end or secondly as a free reward In the former respect To live an intellectuall life in obeying God was to Adam so created a connaturall end as to burn is to fire and to give light to the Sunne And God may put the respect of a reward upon any obedientiall end But that Adam should have such an eminent life for the reward of his obedience as a communion with God which is farre above his obedience is the free donation of God nor is there any necessary connexion between Adams perfect obedience and so high and eminent a life nor can this Covenant as touching such a promise be written in his heart God then never loved to make any Covenant yea even that of Works without some acts and out-goings of grace and the hyre was grace how is he not to be served who loves to hyre and allure us to be happy Arminius saith the reward of keeping the Covenant of Works cannot be spirituall nor can the punishment be spirituall because you teach saith he that the obedience is naturall Ans. It followeth not for the reward is spirituall yea and supernaturall from the free promise of God It was that God should recompence our naturall obedience coming from connaturall principles with so eminent a Crowne as communion with God Creator in a life of glory And this came from no innate proportion between a naturall work and supernaturall reward Otherwise we must say first that there is such an intrinsecall connexion ex naturâ rei between Adams work and so high wages as that glorious communion was as the Lord could not but in justice so have rewarded his obedience except he would be unjust but there is nothing in the creature that can conclude limite or determine his will 〈◊〉 wisdome who is infinite 2. It had been nothing against justice if
Now except it be yeelded that James speaks of two â—aiths one dead and empty ascribed to the hypocrite ver â—â— 15 16. another lively and working ascribed to Abraham â—er 23. and except this be denied that Abraham was 〈◊〉 ver 23. not by that same faith It must follow that Aâ—â—ahams empty beleeving ver 23. was that which was countâ—â—o him for righteousnesse Gen. 15.6 but James cannot be so â—â—derstood but when he saith the Scripture Gen. 15.6 〈◊〉 â—ulfilled for his faith in beleeving the promised seed Geâ—â— he shows that Abraham was justified by faith without 〈◊〉 as Paul Rom. 4. and when he saith he was justified 〈…〉 â—orks in offering his son as Gen. 22. he saith he was 〈◊〉 â—â—â—lared just or not justified by the empty and idle faith of 〈◊〉 hypocrites but by a faith that did prove it self to be lively So that James proveth that we are not justified by a dead faith that neither hath nor can have good works As his Adversaries said and Paul proves Rom. 4. that we are not justified and saved by works that is by our own inherent perfect righteousnesse because Rom. 3. all have sinned Jew and Gentile Because Abraham then should boast as a perfect man free of sin and he needed no Redeemer the Law of works should save him and so he needed not remission of sins nor the non-imputation of iniquity But there is a mids between these and Iames saith that is to be justified by faith by a metonymie of the effect by faith made known to be lively not to the world only but to their own conscience for if Iames should mean that we are justified by works properly as counted to us for righteousnesse he could not say vers 21. Abraham was justified by works when he offered his son vers 22. he cannot infer vers 2â— thou sees that his faith wrought with his works What faith He had spoken of works vers 21. not one word of Abrahamsâ—aith â—aith yet he saith because Abraham was justifâ—â—d that is declared to be really before God to his own consciencâ— and others justified his faith did work in a lively way as reall in anâ— by his works and you see that Abrahams faith Gen. 15.6 was perfectâ—â— by works Gen. 22. when he offered his son Now it was not 〈◊〉 as touching the nature of it and the act of justifying for 〈◊〉 Rom. 4. cites Gen. 15.6 to prove that Abraham was justified by 〈◊〉 faith in beleeving the promise of the blessed seed some 25. yearâ— as others reckon 30. years before he sacrificed Isaac Gen. 22 â— that it must follow that Abraham was not justified by works noâ— his 〈◊〉 perfect in its lively operations untill he offered his son Isaac â—hen the contrair of this the Scripture tells us for by faith he 〈◊〉 his Countrey C. 12. By faith beleeving the promise he was 〈◊〉 Rom. 4. many yearâ— before Therefore these words seest thou 〈◊〉 faith must mean that his faith came out to view by his works But theâ—e be learned and godly Protestants who 〈◊〉 that James must speak of â—ustification reall and before God and 〈…〉 declared Justification before men only Answ. It s true 〈…〉 to name them But these are subordinate James speaks not 〈◊〉 a faith only declared nor of a justification onely declared to the world But of a declared Justification that is reall before God 2. That is declared to the man himself and to the world And that James speaks of a Justification before God the Text saith Because he saith ver 14. What can that faith profite Which is empty he must mean what can it profite before God to save and justifie As the word 1 Cor. 13.3 if I have not love 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it profits me nothing before God 2. Can that faith it is not well translated leaving out the particle in the new Translation can faith save him save him Then he must speak also of reall faith and so reall salvation and so of justification before God 3. The examples of the Justification of Abraham of Rahab which were reall must say something to the same purpose 2. That he speaks of reall Justification to the mans own conscience as well as to the world if clear in the Text also For James speaks to the conscience and privitie of the man who saith that he is justified and hath faith vers 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast faith thou beleeves the Devils also beleeve he would have the hypocrite to discusse his own conscience and solidely to know whether his Faith and Justification be reall or not And James wakens all visible professours in this Epistle as Iohn also doth to try his Religion whether it be true and solide or vain by Chap. 1. being a doer of the Word and not a hearer only 23 24. by visiting the fatherlesse vers 27. by loving and respecting the poor that are Godly as well as the rich Ch. 2. by trying his faith whether it be dead or lively by bridling the tongue Ch. 3. And therefore the Arminians and others do but lose their labour who say Iames doeth not speak here of Justification declared to the world because the world cannot judge infallibly whether our works by which we are declared to be justified are sincere or not For 1. we say that Iames doth speak of Justification declared to the world for he speaks of real Justification before God but as declared not to the world only but to the conscience also of the doer 2. Because the world can not infallibly judge of our Justification and works therefore they cannot judge at all It s a loose consequence For we may declare our selves to our own conscience and to others by our good works that we are before God justified Otherwise because men connot see our good works nor the principles from which they proceed whether from saving faith or not nor the ends for which they are whether for the glory of God or not men should not glorifie our heavenly Father Contrair to Matth. 5.16 nor should the Gentiles glorify God in the day of visitation As 1 Pet. 2.12 because they cannot infallibly 〈◊〉 whether they be good works or not and done in faith and for Goâ— Nor is Abraham declared to be justified because of a secret heart-â—â—tention to offer his son to God in the court of men but in the coâ—â—t of his own conscience he may yet his journeying to the place where he was to sacrifice his son his building an Altar his laying on wood his binding his son and stretching out his hand to kill him may well declare him to be a justified man to the world and to men Trelcatius the Professours of Leyden Calvine Beza Paraeus yea a Papist Cajetan hath said well to this point Not to adde that Scripture shall never admit that Abrahams and Rahabs sins were pardoned their iniquities not imputed and they delivered from condâ—mnation
or to hearken to conscience which craves in the name of mistaken Law well payed debts and this is but Sathan abusing the Law and feigning Letters of Caption in the name of the Law to trouble the quieted conscience of a beleever But its safest to say I stand to what Christ hath done and suffered to fulfill the Law and I believe I was crucified in him judged and condemned legally in Christ and what can you seek more of an ill-doer He is condemned crucified hanged on a tree and so is justice quieted Some raise the devill and a storm in the soul and cannot calm it again It is not good to provoke irritate and waken a sleeping dogge There is quietnesse and peace of beleeving what Christ hath done as well done and comfortably to rest on his deed by faith Hence a case of some who because they are under deadnesse and security desire a wakening of conscience and Sathan hath taught some to commit some hainous guiltinesse that they may fall in the hand of justice and so be wakened and Sathan gives them their fill of it Hence we had rather take a Law-way which is not Gods way as ly under deadnesse there may be a legall looking upon deadnesse whereas it is a Gospel-sin that we should be humbled for and in which we should not please our selves but no man freed from the Law and brought out of prison should be willing or desirous to return to the dungeon again We should let God guide us under a feaver and not be our own Physitians but be quiet at Christs part if he be pleased to cure by contrairs and to quicken me by deadening me or to make a soul humble by smiting with a spirit of pride its good we are to submit Obj. How could we be in Christ as in our surety for saith Arminius we did not give nor appoint Christ to be our Cautioner or Surety Ans. It s evill arguing of Arminius or Sathan who would make the union either naturall or legall betwixt us and Christ weak far off generall and such as is betwixt Christ and Pagans and all the world But this reason is nought for we sinners were not born and very nothing when God made the first Adam our father and head in Law as in nature nor had we any hand or action in substituting the first Adam in his place and yet we sinned in Adam and his sin is ours by divine imputation But can any deny but Christ on the Crosse did act the cause of many beleevers not born This is peculiar to this dispensation that the creditor not the debter appoint both the Law-head and the Evangelick Surety The Surety had from us a Cautionary sponsorie and deputed nature but no subscribed commission from us it was in the heart of the Creditor by grace efficacious to obtain our consent and to make a sort of legall marriage assuming our nature before we either knew our husband or gave consent to the marriage-Covenant As the Advocat speaks in the person of the Client absent and sleeping and when the Client hears and sees how his cause is promoved he both assents unto and renders thanks and praises to the Advocat and so the absent and far off Client not knowing any thing does act in the Advocat And how many answers doth our Advocat in Heaven make for sinners on earth in his pleadings of which we know not in particular any thing Nor doth Christ speak or plead for beleevers as a privat man nor appear in his Name as it were but in our person Neither is there a faining of a person here or a borrowed and fained redemption there be these five here 1. A Redeemer Christ. 2. Persons redeemed sinners 3. A Lord from whom we are redeemed the Lord Jehovah not simply as God he is the partie from whom we are redeemed but God as the offended Law-giver who had us lyable to eternall punishment 4. There was a price the life and blood of God which though not profitable to God for that is extrinsecall to satisfaction reall yet an aboundant compensation to justice for declarative glory taken from God which is the nature of reall satisfaction 5. There is here a God just true holy unchangeable to whom the price is payed Nor does Christ sustain the person of the enemy Satan from whom we are redeemed for he is but the lictor who then had no right to detain us we are redeemed from evils of sin and punishment Nor doth Christ in suffering sustain the person of God Hence from our being crucified with Christ crucified something is to be said in a practicall way of our mortification for mortification flows originally from Christs death we being crucified in him and with him Gal. 2.20 Q. What is mortification A. It is a deadning of the whole powers and inclinations of the soul in their bentnesse and operations in order to things forbidden by the Law of God or in things indifferent and commanded Hence not the affections only but the understanding and mind must be deadned And therefore this is no mortification untill sin originall be subdued in its damnation by Christs death and in its dominion by the Spirit of Sanctification A tree is not withered while standing on its root bulk and branches are green and flourishing It s much to know the withdrawing of sap and life from the root and the vitall parts of old Adam The ebbing of a River is not the drying up of it the new birth only is mortification Q. 2. Since mortification comes only from Christs death what is the influence of Christs death herein Ans. The influence is reall ad modum causae physicae the merit of blood hath bought us from our vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 Christ dying doth merit by blood the Spirit and infused grace which deadens the whole life of sin Evangelick Arguments from ten heavens from ten Gospels working morally and in a swasory way cannot more work mortification then touching can make a reall change on a dead corps we was legally dead and crucified in Christ and with Christ when he died many not being born then But in the infusing of the life of God Christ applyes the reall principle of mortification Now the redemption from a vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 from the present evil world Gal. 1.4 is as reall and proper a bargain except we follow Socinus as redemption from the wrath to come 2. Christs death hath an influence morall and swasorie to work mortification As 1 Pet. 1.16 Be holy 17. Passe the time of your sojourning in fear For ye are bought with his blood from your vain conversation And 1 Pet. 5.1 2. Christ hath suffered in the flesh therefore be mortified to your lusts and serve them not as the Gentiles do So Col. 3.1.5 But the action morall of the Gospel doth not work upon the naturall man for like works upon the like carnall reason upon a carnall spirit and
as he is also the Author of this Covenant as God Exod. 3.6 It was he who said I am the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. 1 Cor. 10.9 Let us not tempt Christ as some of them tempted him and were destroyed of the Serpents And this is he who led them and brought them out of Aegypt Numb 21.6 7. whom they tempted in the wildernesse 5 6 7. And he ascribes to himself the Covenant Heb. 8.9 Not according to the Covenant that I made with their fathers c. And it is clear that the pardon of sin promised in the Covenant Jer. 31. Heb. 8. is never ascribed to the blood of Martyrs but every where to Christs blood Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.14 Rom. 3.25 Rev. 1.5 1 Joh. 1.8 Heb. 9.14.14 15 22. Heb. 10.16 17 18. 2. That he is the Surety also of the Covenant is expresly said Heb. 7.22 and the Mediator thereof Heb. 8. Nor can it be said that the death of the Testator does properly give faith and authority to the Testament for the authority and justice of the just or unjust will of the Testator addeth unto or diminisheth from the authority of the Testament for the Testators will is the principal efficient cause of the Testament the death of the man is only a necessary condition by which the right of the Testator to these goods is transferred from him who now being dead needs them not in to friends to whom they are left in Legacie and so death is but an antecedent condition of the right to the goods 3. Christs dying to bear witnesse to his own Gospel is only the secondary end of his death in so far as secondarily remission of sins is made known to us after the principall end of his death to wit reconciliation remission pardon redemption and life is purchased to us by way of merit And sure the truth of pardon and redemption is hugely more confirmed and sealed by the whole company of the Martyrs and made known to the sons of men then by the death of one single man Maries Son Nor does the Scripture ever commend Christs love to us in sealing the Gospel with his blood as the only way to life or making this the most strong Argument to move us to beleeve in God and obey Christ because Christ died for sinners and rose again to make the Gospel true like and worthy to be beleeved as the Martyres do but love shined in this that in dying we have redemption and forgivenesse and life in his blood And since Godly and sound beleeving Martyrs died for this end especially to glorifie God and seal the truth Joh. 21.19 Rev. 2.13 Mat. 10.32 Luk. 12.8 Mar. 8.38 Luk. 9.26 2 Tim. 2.12 Rev. 12. â—1 we must have most properly forgivenesse of sins in the blood of Sâ—even and Antipas and the rest of the Martyres And miracles do aboundantly seal the truth of the Gospel And so doth the holinesse of profession Joh. 20.32 Mar. 16.20 Joh. 5.35 36. Matth. 5.16 but never are we redeemed justified saved by Christs and the Apostles miracles and holy life for any thing we read in Scripture but we have life by Christs blood as by a ransome a price to buy us Q. Hence 1. case May not the conscience be quiet by the way of Socinus which lays aside a ransome given to Justice Ans. The experience of the Godly man wakened in conscience saith to this when he is chastened with pain in his bed and the multitude of his bones with strong pain and the mans soul drawes â—ear to the gâ—ave and his life unto the destroyers and the man stands on need of an Interpreter one among a thousand to shew unto man his righteousnesse Job 33.19 20 21 22 23. Then God is gracious to him and saith deliver him from going down to the pit I have found him a ransome He is not quiet while God say my Prophet deliver him from hell and the pit which he so much fears for my offended Justice hath found a ransome in Christ and I am 〈◊〉 with him Yea and the conscience must be purged from 〈◊〉 works by his blood who offered himself without spot to God through the eternall Spirit Heb. 9.14 Yea and there is no remission of sins without sheding of blood v. 22. Not of Buls or Goats for the blood of beasts leaves still conscience of sin Heb. 10.1 2. Then it must be the blood of Christ v. 5.10 who was crucified and made a curse for us Gal. 3.10 such a curse as we must have eternally according to Divine Justice suffered Yea if works done by the exemplary grace of a Martyr such a holy man as Christ who was never wounded for our transgressions nor bruised for our iniquities then Christ died in vain and there was no ransome of blood given for our sins only God of free-will made an innocent man a curse and would have him crucified neither for his own sin nor for ours well then may good works without the blood of sinner or surety take away sin And the conscience sprinkled with good works may well calm a guilty conscience yea and according to the measure of good works is the measure of assurance of peace with God Now we see the most tender David Job Hezekiah Heman who walked most with God have not alway most assurance of peace and righteousnesse with God but most dreadfull doubtings of conscience according as by faith they apprehend the ransome of full satisfaction or were dazled and darkened in their apprehension yea sure without the ransome of blood of free-will all receive a dry and unbloody pardon by doing the Commandements of Jesus Christ. The Socinian faith which looks to an exemplary Martyr whom God of no justice but in vain and for no cause delivered to death but of meer free pleasure whereas there might be and is forgivenesse without shedding of blood contrair to Heb. 9.22 Rom. 3.24.25 c. even good works done in imitation of Christ. Q. 2. Another case is here Is Christ on our side of the Covenant and on the Lords side This would seem no satisfying of justice Ans. It is true the case would seem no quieting of conscience If 1. Christ-God were not the same offended God who out of soveraignty of free grace doth condescend to make a Covenant of grace and so is upon Gods side 2. If Christ were not a Person different from offended God as the Godhead is common to all the three so in a voluntary and admirable dispensation and Oeconomie the Kings Son a Person different from the Father taketh upon him our nature And 3. having mans nature which offended and so being fit therein to satisfie wrath and fit therein to merit to sanctifie the people with his own blood might well be upon our side and there 's no scenick no seeming but a most reall satisfaction here in that there is a most full and reall compensation made to offended justice and our faith laying hold on
36.26 27. Jer. 31.31 32 33 34 35. Jer. 32.39 40. Neither can there be confidence and faith in God through the sure mercies of David nor peace nor solide consolation nor warrand to pray for the Lords gracious bowing of the will to be his seed except it be beleeved Covenanted that God shall be the God of his people and their King not over the element of the sea only to rule it and over the mountains and the stones and rocks but also over the particular wills and the willing and nilling choosing of good and refusing of evill in the men of the Iles. And how could the Son pray Father give the inheritance of the Heathen to me according to promise Ask of me and I will give thee c. Psal. 2. If the Father could answer nothing but what Arminians and Socinians say he answers as also the beleever out of the fleshes weaknesse must dictat this return of prayer Son with good will I grant the Heathen and the ends of the earth to thee in heritage and possession so they be willing to submit to thee But what if they refuse to obey either me or thee I did never Covenant with thee Son to do more then I can try thy strength and force their free-will if thou can if they be willing well and good it is there is a bargain My approving and commanding will is that they be thy seed and thy willing people but my decree is not to Lord it over their will that is a fundamentall act of Government that all my subjects have liberty of conscience to will or nill as they please Nay but the Covenant of Suretyship includes the sure mercies of David and the Lord gives band word and writ and seal of blood and the Oath of God to the Son Psal. 110.4 Heb. 7.21 for the will Isa. 53.4 Behold I have given him for a witnesse of the people a leader and commander to the people But what if they will neither lead nor drive Yea the Lord promises they shall not need to be driven they shall be willing and run 5. Behold thou shalt call a Nation that thou knowest not and Nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of the Lord thy God and of the Holy One of Israel for he hath glorified thee And a strong reason of this is given the Gentiles run Whence comes this forwardnesse of the Gentiles who knew not God Because saith Isaiah of Jehovah thy God of Christ Mediatour in Covenant with thee Psal. 22.1 Joh. 20. â—0 because of thy God the Holy One of Israel the running saith Calvin notteth the efficacy of the calling and they run to Christ because of Jehovah and the mighty power of God in the Man-Christ â— Noteth because saith Piscator And another reason because he hath glorified thee O Christ he hath declared thee to be the Son of God by thy rising from the dead ascension to heaven given thee a Name above all names Rom. 1.4 Phil. 2.7 8 9 10. So Musculus Piscator Marlorat Gualther Diodati So the running of the Gentiles to Christ is the glorifying of Christ and a part of the reward it s Christs glory that he hath a seed that runs after him Then And M. Dickson upon these words Ps. 2. Aske of me after Christs resurrection and declaration of his formerly overclouded Godhead he should continue in the Offiâ—e of his Mediation and Intercession and by vertue of his payed ransone of Redemption call for the inlargement of his purchased Redemption among the Gentiles for this is the Fathers compact with the Son saying aske of me and I will give thee the Heathen so that both by free Covenant and by merit Christ challengeth a seed and it were unjustice in the Lord with reverence and glory to his Holines to deny to Christ that for which he hath given a condign ransone and price But he hath payed a condign Covenantâ—ransone of his own precious self and offered blood for hâ—s seed Hence 1. though a weak beleever cannot by merit suit a bowed will and a circumcised heart from the Lord Yet 1. may be suit it by the band of the Covenant of Redemption between Jehovah and the Son and a Redeemed one may say it was an Article of the Covenant of Redemption that my stony heart should be taken away and a heart of flesh given to me and faith hath influence to be supported that God articled Covenant-ways such a wretch as I am to Christ and look as the book of life called the Lambs Book of Life contains so many by name head and in all their individuall properties Jacob Paul c. that are written and inrolled for glory so are all and I by name in a Covenant-relation given of the Father to the Son Joh. 17.3 9.11 Joh. 6.39 and that is surer then heaven or the fixed ordinances of nature Jer. 31.35 36. Psal. 89.37 38. Happy such as can ride at this anchor Though I mean not that the decree of election and the roll of the Mediatour to me or the gracious Suretyâ—Covenant between Jehovah and the Son as relating to me by name must be the nearest object of faith or that alwayes a beleever doth read this roll but his faith often is and ought and may be supported thereby 2. Christ may suit by vertue of both the Surety Covenant and by the justice of God his condign merite to me a fixed will to run the way of his Commandements Christs appearing with blood Heb. 9. and his prayer as high Priest Joh. 17. prove that in Christs Bill for us there is justice the merite of blood and that his Advocation is 1 John 2.1 grounded upon justice and he stands there as Jesus Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the righteous without sin now imputed not now made sin nor made a curse but by order of strict justice justified and righteous and the act of Suretyship taken off and as the hand-writing against us is cancelled upon the Crosse Col. 2. So the hand-writing of oblidged punishment due to Christ as our Surety is removed and he now justified in the Spirit without sin Heb. 9.28 Such a one as cannot die Rom. 6.9 Rev. 1.18 and cannot die a death satisfactory for sin because as beleevers cannot die the second death Christ having died for them neither can Christ suffer the second death again or be twice a curse for once he died for all But our faith is so supported not a little in this I darre not put merit or justice in my suits to God but I beleeve it is and must be in Christs bill and that bill is for me mercy and only mercy is in the sinners bill but the justice of a condign ransoner is in Christs suits and so faith looks to Christ As 1. having the first Covenant-right to heaven as the great Lord receiver of the promises And then we have a second right in him 2. Faith looks to Christ as having