Selected quad for the lemma: conscience_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
conscience_n	godly_a	rejoice_v	simplicity_n	1,031	5	9.5439	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A40091	A sermon preached at the general meeting of Gloucestershire-men, for the most part inhabitants of the City of London in the Church of St. Mary le-Bow, December the 9th, 1684 / by Edward Fowler.	Fowler, Edward, 1632-1714.	1685 (1685)	Wing F1718; ESTC R10668	14,518	40

Sin And no longer to insist upon this Mans Character He who Fears God doth exercise himself with the Blessed Apostle to have always a Conscience void of Offence both towards God and towards Men And this is his rejoycing the Testimony of his Conscience that in simplici●y and Godly sincerity not by fleshly Wisdom but by the grace of God he hath his Conversation in the World Secondly I proceed to shew what it is to Honour the King This implieth these following Particulars 1. The Revering of Him as Gods Vicegerent as His immediate Representative Kings are called the Ministers of God He is the Minister of God to thee for good Rom. 13. 4. The Higher Powers in the same Chapter are said to be ordained of God v. 1. 2. There is no Power but of God the Powers that be are Ordained of God whosoever therefore resisteth the Power resisteth the Ordinance of God for which reason as it follows They that resist shall receive to themselves Damnation Kings are said to Reign by God or by Virtue of the Commission they receive from Him By me Kings Reign and Princes decree Justice by me Princes Rule and Nobles even all the Judges of the Earth Prov. 8. 15. That is by God immediately Kings Reign and Inferiour Magistrates by God mediately as receiving their Commissions immediately from the King who is impowred by God to give them Again Kings are called the Anotnted of God even Cyrus though a Heathen Prince is so called Thus saith the Lord to Cyrus his Anointed Isaiah 45. 1. And Lastly God hath put his own Name upon them I have said ye are Gods Thou shalt not revile the Gods nor Curse or speak evil of the Ruler of thy People Exod. 22. 28. Now this being so in the Honouring of the King is manifestly implied the Honouring Him as Gods Vicegerent and Representative as the Person whom he hath Commissionated to Rule under Him This is to Honour the King which a Man may be short of doing and yet have Reverence for his Person For Honour or Reverence is due to all Men. Honour all Men saith the Apostle before my Text But to Reverence the King under the notion of Gods Minister Gods Deputy and Vicegerent this I say is to Honour the King This is to Honour Him as a King and therefore he who honours him not under this notion though he may honour that Person who is the King he doth not honour the King or which is the same thing he gives him not that Honour that is due to the King 2. In Honouring the King is implyed Expressing the Reverence we bear to him as God's Vicegerent by yielding Obedience to his Laws from a Principle of Conscience Whatsoever Honour we express to his Person that is not accompanied with the Observance of his Laws is insignificant Nay 't is a perfect Mockery of him And our King may say what our and His Great Master did Luk. 6. 46. Why call ye me Lord Lord and do not the things which I say This is shameful Hypocrisy And as without Obedience so without Obedience from a Principle of Conscience too our Honouring the King will fall far short of our Duty and be far from speaking us truly Loyal 1. To obey the Kings Laws merely for fear of the Penalties annexed to them is not Loyalty 'T is neither Christian nor true Loyalty This is not Christian Loyalty For the Apostle hath told us that We must needs be subject not only for Wrath but also for Conscience sake Rom. 13. 5. And St. Peter saith 1 Ep. 2. 13. Submit your selves to every Ordinance of Man or to every Ordinance of Man which doth not contradict any Ordinance of God And God be thanked no People in the World have better Laws and Ordinances than those of our King are But now How doth the Apostle say we must submit to every Ordinance of Man it follows for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as Supreme or unto Governours as unto them that are sent by him c. Now to submit for the Lords sake and to submit for Conscience sake are the self same thing for the Lord alone can immediately bind the Conscience and the King binds the Conscience by his Laws as the Great God hath obliged us upon pain of damnation to observe them That is all such Laws as I now said as are not contrary to his own For as to all such as are contrary to them we must reply as the same Apostle did VVhether it be righteous in the sight of God to hearken unto men more than unto God judg ye Acts 4. 19. But God be praised VVe have not any occasion to use these words to our Governours Furthermore we are so to obey the King as not only not to disobey God in Obeying him but likewise so as to Obey God in obeying him And he obeyeth God in obeying the King who obeyeth him as God 's immediate Representative And thus to do as hath been shewed is to obey him as a King And therefore not so to do as it is inconsistent with Christian so also with true Loyalty But to obey him from mere Fear of Punishment is to give the King such Obedience as the poor Indians give to the Devil Worship It is to obey him only as one who hath gotten us under his Power and who will have his Will upon us whether we will or no. Thus we would obey the Great Turk were we his Vassals or any Usurping Tyrant and consequently to be subject to our Lawful King from the mere Principle of Fear is no Loyalty at all And 2. The like is to be said of Obeying him merely for our own temporal Interest for the making our selves Rich and Great under him or for the bettering of our Fortunes All Kings have ever had too many such Loyal Subjects who whilst Loyalty serves their turns set up for Mighty Royalists but when nothing more is to be gotten by it but especially when any considerable danger attends it shake hands with their Loyalty and will by no means be held to their Allegeance by the mere Sense of their Duty nor by the most Sacred Oaths again and again repeated That Blessed Martyr King Charles the First had woful experience of such Loyal Subjects and so hath our Present Gracious Soveraign had too When a King is in prosperous Circumstances and able to reward plentifully whatsoever Services are done him there needs nothing but an eager desire of Wealth or Honour or both to excite to the making a Mighty Shew of Loyalty But if he chance to be so Unfortunate as that more is to be hoped for by deserting his Interest than cleaving to it there is the Tryal of true Loyalty But if this Tryal happen as God grant it may never among us again that Subject who is indued with this Principle will be stript stark Naked of all his Enjoyments and part with his Heart-Blood to boot rather than forsake or prove false to