Selected quad for the lemma: conscience_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
conscience_n faith_n hold_v shipwreck_n 2,221 5 12.7929 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A52412 An account of reason & faith in relation to the mysteries of Christianity / by John Norris. Norris, John, 1657-1711. 1697 (1697) Wing N1243; ESTC R17698 127,080 368

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

AN ACCOUNT OF Reason Faith In RELATION to the MYSTERIES OF CHRISTIANITY By JOHN NORRIS M. A. Rector of Bemerton near Sarum Holding Faith and a good Conscience which some having put away Concerning Faith have made Ship-wrack 1 Tim. 1. 19. LONDON Printed for S. Manship at the Ship near the Royal Exchange in Cornhil 1697. To the Right Honourable Henry Lord of Colerane My Lord YOur Lordships Learning and Knowledge in Matters of Religion and Sincerity in the Belief and Profession of its Sacred Articles are both so well known that I cannot be supposed to Present this Book to your Lordship with a Design to instruct you in the Former or to Settle and Confirm you in the Latter There are indeed but too many in the World to whom it may be necessary upon those Accounts but all that I intend in reference to your Lordship by it is only to express my Reverence and Respect for your great Worth and Goodness and my grateful Acknowledgments for that particular Share and Interest I have had in your Favours Which give me further Occasion to hope that you will be as kind to the Book a● you have been to the Author and that as you were pleas'd to incourage the Undertaking so you will now favour the Performance which with all deference and Submission is humbly presented to your Lordship by My Lord Your Lordships most Obliged and very humble Servant J. Norris THE PREFACE COntroversies of Religion and particularly this have been managed of late with that Intemperance of Passion and Indecency of Language after such a Rude Bear-Garden way so much more like Duelling or Prizing than Disputing that the more good Natured and better Bred part of the World are grown almost Sick of them and Prejudic'd against them not being able to see Men Cut and Slash and draw Blood from one another after such an inhuman manner only to vent their own Spleen and make diversion for the Savage and brutalized Rabble without some troublesom resentments of Pity and Displacency And truly 't is hard for a Man to read some certain things of this Character without being disturb'd and growing out of humour upon 't and being even out of Conceit with Mankind such an Idea do they raise of the Malignity of Human Nature and so do they ruffle an● Chagrine the Mind of the Reader From which impressions he will hardly recover himself till he meets with some Book or other of a Contrary Spirit whereof the Bishop of London-Derry's Excellent Discourse of the Inventions of Men in the Worship of God is a very eminent Instance which may serve to recompose the One and give him a better Opinion of the Other I have endeavour'd in the Management of the present Argument to use such Christian Temper and Moderation as becomes the Search of Truth and may argue a Mind Concern'd only for the finding it For of all the ill-sorted things in Nature I think it the most improper and disagreeable to reason in a Passion especially when 't is in defence of that Religion which neither needs at nor allows it And therefore laying aside all Anger and Disaffection which even for the advantage of well reasoning ought to be laid aside I have set my Self to observe the Laws of Decency as well as those of good Discourse to Consider things as they really are in their own Natures to represent them as I find them with all Calmness and Sedateness to regard nothing but the pure Merits of the Cause and to treat that Party of Men I write against with that Candour and Respect as may the better dispose them to lend Attention to my Arguments Considering it as one of the Principal Rules of the Art of Perswasion to gain upon the Affections of Men in order to the Conviction of their Iudgments And I do not know that I am guilty of any incivility towards the Men I deal with unless it be that of Contradicting them Wherein as they are even with me so I hope they will not be less so in the other part but will treat me with the like return of Civility and good Temper in Case they shall think fit to make any The Occasion of this undertaking was a Certain late Book call'd Christianity Not Mysterious one of the most Bold daring and irreverent pieces of Defiance to the Mysteries of the Christian Religion that even this Licentious Age has produced and which has been supposed to have done great Battery and Execution upon them and to be indeed a very shrewd and notable Performance even by people of competent Sense and Learning not excluding the Author himself who to shew his good Opinion both of his Cause and of his Management of it has since publish'd a Second Edition of his Book with inlargements and with his Name To which I thought once to have return'd a direct and Formal Answer by way of Solution of his Objections till upon further Consideration I judg'd it better to give an Absolute Account of the Positive Side of the Question and after having laid such grounds in it as might be made use of for the Confutation of his Book to make a short Application of them in a few Strictures upon it at the End of Mine But after I had laid those Grounds in the Absolute part I found the Application of them was so easie to the Author's Objections that they might as well be made by my Reader who might with such readiness out of the Principles here establish'd form an Answer to all that deserves one in that Book that I thought there was no need of inlarging the Bulk of mine upon that account Which accordingly tho' I do not call by the Name of an Answer to Christianity Not Mysterious I cannot but reckon to have all the Substance though not the Formality of a Reply to that Treatise it being much the same thing in effect either to unlock a door for a Man or to put into his hands a Key that will I write neither for Favour nor for Preferment but only to serve the Cause of Christianity for so I call that of its Mysteries and the interest of that Church which is so great a Friend to it and Maintainer of it according to its purest and most Primitive State of Apostolical and Evangelic Perfection Of whose Communion 't is my Happiness to be a Member my Glory to be a Priest and that I had better Abilities to do her Service my highest Ambition However such as they are I humbly devote and imploy them to that purpose as I do this and all other my Labours I hope what I have written may do some Service to the Cause whose Defence it Undertakes and if it does I shall not much regard the resentments of any Designing or not so well affected Persons Great or Little whose displeasure it may provoke tho' I have taken all due Care not to give any body any reasonable Offence And so I Commit the following Papers to the attentive
Consideration viz. That therefore the Incomprehensibility of a thing is no Argument against the Belief of it neither where also I Consider that seemingly Opposite Maxim of Des Cartes that we are to Assent to nothing but what is Clear and Evident and reconcile it to the other Position Whence my next step was to state the true use of Reason in Believing which I shew'd to Consist not in examining the Credibility of the Object but in taking account of the Certainty of the Revelation which when once resolv'd of we are no longer to Dispute but Believe In fine I have made an Application of these Considerations to the Mysteries of the Christian Faith by shewing that they are never the less to be Believ'd for being Mysteries supposing● them otherwise sufficiently Reveal'd against which also I have shewn their Incomprehensibility to be no Objection So that every way the Great Argument against the Mysteries of the Christian Faith taken from the Incomprehensibility of them vanishes and sinks into nothing In all which I think I have effectually overthrown the General and Fundamental Ground of Socinianism and truely in great Measure that of Deism too whose best Argument against Reveal'd Religion in general is because the Christian upon all Accounts the most preferable of those that pretend to be Reveal'd Contains so many things in it which transcend the Comprehension of Human Understanding But whether this Best Argument be really a good one or no the whole Procedure of this Discourse may sufficiently shew and whoever knows how to distinguish Sophistry from good Reasoning may easily judge 2. And now you Gentlemen for whose sakes I have been at the pains to write this Treatise give me leave in a few words to Address my self a little more particularly to you and to Expostulate with you Whether it be the good opinion you have of your Cause or the present Opportunity you have to appear in the behalf of it that invites you so freely to Come abroad as you have done of late you have certainly to give your Courage its due taken a very rational and Polite Age for it and I hope the Wise Conduct of Providence may turn this juncture to the Advantage of the Truth and that the Light to which you have adventur'd to expose your Novel Opinions may serve to make you see their Absurdities if you do not too Obstinately shut your Eyes against it Some of you are Considerable Masters of Reason otherwise truly I should not think it worth while to argue with you and you all profess great Devotion to it I wish you do not make it an Idol and to be very Zealous and Affectionate Disciples of it Reason is the great Measure by which you pretend to go and the Judge to whom in all things you appeal Now I accept of your Measure and do not refuse to be tried in the Court of your own Chusing Accordingly you see I have dealt with you all along upon the Ground of Logic and in a Rational way being very Confident that Reason alone will discover to you your undue Elevations of it and the Errours you have been misled into by that Occasion if you do but Consult even this Oracle of yours as you ought and make a right use of its Sacred Light 3. But I am afraid you do not Instead of imploying your Reason in the first place to examin the Certainty of the Revelation whether such a thing be truly Reveal'd and if so to believe it notwithstanding its being incomprehensible your Method is to begin with the Quality of the Object to Consider whether it be Comprehensible or no and accordingly to proceed in your Belief or Disbelief of its being Reveal'd 'T is true indeed you are not so gross as to argue thus this is Comprehensible therefore 't is Reveal'd But you cannot deny but that you argue thus this is Incomprehensible therefore 't is not Reveal'd proceeding upon this general Principle that though whatever is Comprehensible is not therefore presently Reveal'd yet whatever is Reveal'd must be Comprehensible But now judge you whether this be not to make your Reason the Rule and Measure of Divine Revelation that is that God can reveal nothing to you but what you can Comprehend or that you are able to Comprehend all that God can possibly Reveal for otherwise how is your not being able to Comprehend any thing an Argument of its not being Reveal●d I say Consider whether this be not to set up your Reason as the Rule of Revelation and Consider again whether this does not resolve either into a very low Opinion you have of God and his Infinite Perfections or an extravagantly high one you have of your selves and your own Rational indowments 4. And yet as if this were not Presumption enough do you not also make your Reason the Rule of Faith as well as of Revelation To be the Rule of Faith is a very Great thing and yet so far 't is plain that you make your Reason the Rule of Faith that you will allow nothing to be believ'd but whose Bottom you can Sound by that Line this being an avow'd Principle with you that you are to believe nothing but what you can Comprehend But hold a little before your Reason can be the Measure of Faith must it not be the Measure of Truth And I pray Consider seriously and tell me truly do you verily think in your Consciences that your Reason is the Measure of Truth Do you think your Rational Faculties proportion'd to every intelligible Object and that you are able to Comprehend all the things that are and that there is nothing in the whole extent of Science too high too difficult or too abstruse for you no one part of this vast Intellectual Sea but what you can wade through If you say yes besides the Blasphemous Presumptions and Luciferian Arrogance of the Assertion and how little it falls on this side of Similis ero Altissimo which banish'd the vain-glorious Angel from the Court of Heaven because nothing less would Content his Aspiring Ambition than to be as God there though by the way there is more Sense and Congruity of Reason in pretending to be a God in Heaven than to be a God upon Earth I say besides this I would put it to your more sober thought to Consider whether it be not every whit as great an Extremity in the way of Rational Speculation to Dogmatize so far as to pretend to Comprehend every thing as to say with the Sceptics and Pyrrhonians that we know nothing The latter of which however in regard of its Moral Consequences may be more innocently and safely affirm'd than the Former since in that we only humbly degrade our selves and are Content to sink down into the Level of Brutes whereas in this we aspire to what is infinitely above us and advance our selves into the Seat of God And you know an Excess of Self-dejection is of the two the more tolerable Extreme But if
Perusal of the Candid and Considerate Reader and to the Blessing of God THE CONTENTS Chapter I. OF Reason Page 18. Chapter II. Of Faith p. 53. Chapter III. The Distinction of things Contrary to Reason and above Reason Consider'd p. 100. Chapter IV. That Human Reason is not the Measure of Truth p. 137. Chapter V. That therefore a things being Incomprehensible by Reason is of it self no Concluding Argument of its not being true p. 230. Chapter VI. That if the Incomprehensibility of a thing were an Argument of its not being True Human Reason would then be the Measure of Truth p. 243. Chapter VII That therefore the Incomprehensibility of a thing is no just Objection against the Belief of it With an Account of the Cartesian Maxim that we are to Assent only to what is Clear and Evident p. 251. Chapter VIII Wherein is shewn what is the true Vse of Reason in Believing p. 282. Chapter IX An Application of the foregoing Considerations to the Mysteries of Christianity p. 294. Chapter X. The Conclusion of the Whole with an Address to the Socinians p. 307. Post-script p. 339. The Introduction 1. AMong the various Conjectures Men of a Prophetic Spirit have fall'n into Concerning the last events we have had this Opinion not long since advanc'd for one that as God formerly by rejecting the Iews made way for the Gentiles so in the latter days he will in like manner by rejecting the Gentiles make way for the Iews to enter into the Christian Church That the state of Christianity being become intirely Corrupt and all over Anti-christianiz'd the First of those Viols of the Divine Wrath that are to exterminate the Wicked and usher in the Terrours of the Great Day shall fall upon the Christian World that Christendom shall be utterly dissolv'd broken in pieces and destroy'd and that the Iews shall be replaced and re●establish'd upon its Ruins And to render it Worthy of so Sore a Calamity that the generality of its Professors shall not only greatly depart from the Primitive Power of the Evangelic Spirit by Apostatizing from the Purity and Perfection of both Christian Faith and Life which we have already seen come to pass but shall even lay down their Holy Profession renounce their very Faith and Religion and turn Infidels Upon the latter part of which Opinion those Words of our Saviour seem to cast a very suspicious Aspect VVhen the Son of Man cometh shall be find Faith upon the Earth As upon the Former do also those words of St. Paul Thou wilt say then The Branches were broken off that I might be graffed in VVell because of unbelief they were broken off and thou standest by Faith Be not high-minded but fear For if God spared not the Natural Branches take heed lest he also spare not thee Behold therefore the Goodness and Severity of God On them which fell Severity but towards thee Goodness if thou continue in his Goodness Otherwise thou also shalt be cut off that is as a dead wither'd and unfruitful Branch as were the Iews for the same Reason before and as our Saviour tells us every unfruitful Branch shall be 2. And truly if one were to judge of these Mens Opinion by the present face and state of things one would be inclined to think it true and that they had the right Key of Prophecy in their hands For sure by all Signs and Appearances the Course of the World seems to drive this way and if there be such a Fatal Revolution to come no doubt but that we are with large steps hastening to it For how are the Vitals of Religion continually struck at the Foundations of it unsettled and undermined its venerable Articles disputed and ridiculed and by what a slender thread does Christianity hang The great Complaint for a long while has been of the Decay of Christian Piety and the Universal Corruption of Manners But now our Religion is corrupted as well as our Manners and we every day make shipwrack of our Faith as well as of a good Conscience So that we have now fill'd our measure and are every way ripe for Destruction Some deny all Reveal'd Religion and consequently the Christian others allowing the Divinity of the Religion deny that of its Author together with the Doctrines of the Trinity Incarnation and Satisfaction others again owning his Divinity deny the necessity of Believing it others again granting that and the other Points deny the necessity of his Satisfaction which is not only resolv'd into mere Prudential Reasons as formerly instead of being grounded upon the Essential Order and Iustice of God but is brought down so low of late as to be made an Accommodation and Condescension to and a gracious Compliance with the common Weaknesses and Prejudices of Mankind Thus is the Christian Religion so mangled and dismember'd by some and so odly and insidiously represented by others that between them both the general Faith of the thing is indanger'd and a ready way prepared to Scepticism and Infidelity 3. Not that I think it ought to be any just matter of Scandal to any considering Christians or Prejudice to their Holy Religion to see so many Corruptions of it and Apostacies and Revoltings from it since this is no more than what the Holy Spirit of God has often forewarn'd us shall come to pass in the latter days wherein we are expresly told that perillous times shall come and that Men shall resist the Truth be proud and high-minded of corrupt minds and reprobate concerning the Faith And moreover that they shall privily bring in damnable Heresies even denying the Lord that bought them This therefore I say ought in reason to be no matter of scandal to any Christians And so neither ought the poor humble suffering condition of Jesus Christ to have been any to the Iews since this also was plainly foretold of the Messias and made a notable part of his Character And yet we find that the Cross of Christ was a stumbling-block to the Iews and so no doubt are the present sufferings I may say Crucifixion of his Religion to many Christians the generality of which measure the certainty of their Faith by the firmness and constancy of its Professors and are apt more to stagger and take offence at the untoward appearance of any Event than to be confirm'd in their belief from its agreement with Antient Prophecies 4. In the mean time what do those without think of us Particularly the Heathens among whom no doubt there are some that neither want Intelligence nor Curiosity to acquaint themselves with the present state of Christendom What a confirmation must it be to these Men in their Infidelity to see Christians grow weary of their own Religion and willing to part with those great and weighty Articles of it for which the holy Martyrs shed their Blood and which could not be extorted from them by all the might and power of their cruel Emperours Can it
though upon a different Medium at the same time For as I said before 't is not the Nature of the thing but the Quality of the Medium that specifies Faith and tho' the same thing cannot have two Natures or be in it self at once evident and not evident yet why may it not sustain two different Relations or be consider'd in two different Mediums so as to be said to be known when perceiv'd by its Evidence and to be believ'd when assented to upon Authority Which certainly may be done as fully and with as little regard to its evidence as if there were no evidence in the thing at all So that the Evidence of the thing does not hinder the Belief of it supposing the Belief not to proceed upon that Evidence but upon its own proper Medium Authority 20. But to use a way of Arguing less Abstract though it may be with some more pressing and convincing Suppose God should reveal to me a Geometrical Truth as that two Triangles having the same Base and being within the same Parallels are equal and I who at first receiv'd it upon his bare Authority should come afterwards to be able to demonstrate it my self upon the known Principles of Art who that well considers the Natures of these things would say that my Science evac●●ted my Faith and that I ceas'd to be a Believer assoon as I became a Mathematician For though I am now supposed to Know what before I only Believ'd yet why should this Knowledge destroy my Faith since I may still have as much regard for the Authority of God and as little to the Evidence of the thing as I had before the Demonstration and would still be ready to assent to it though there were no evidence to be produced for it only upon the Ground of Divine Authority And to use another Sensible though not so Artificial way of arguing I would fain know whether any one of those who are of the Contrary Sentiment would refuse a Demonstrative Account of a Reveal'd Truth suppose the Creation of the World merely for fear of injuring or destroying his Faith which yet he were bound in Conscience to do if Knowledge and Faith were so exclusive of each other and inevidence and Obscurity were so absolutely of the Essence of Faith as some pretend For then it would not be lawful to acquire the Natural Knowledge of any reveal'd Truth because 't is unlawful to destroy one's Faith and every Believer would have just reason to fear all further Light and Information about what he believes which yet I think would be acknowledg'd by all an extravagant Scruple such as can hardly enter much less stay long in any Considering head And is withal Contrary to a plain Exhortation of the Apostle who bids us add to our Faith Knowledge 21. When therefore the Matter of Faith as it is taken for the Truth of the Proposition Believ'd is charged with Obscurity and Faith it self upon that account is said as it commonly is to be of inevident things the Meaning ought not to be of an Absolute but of a Relative inevidence Not that what is Believ'd is so all over dark and obscure that it cannot while Believ'd absolutely be known but only that it cannot under that Formality and so far as it is Believ'd being necessarily in that respect inevident how bright or clear soever it may be in other respects That is in other words though the thing Believ'd absolutely consider'd may be Evident yet it is not so as Believ'd or in relation to Faith because that has no regard to the Evidence how bright soever it may shine but proceeds wholy upon another Argument between which and the Evidence of the thing there is not the least Affinity or Communication The short is the Object of Faith simply and absolutely speaking may admit of Evidence but then though it be never so evident and demonstrable in it self yet as Believ'd it is always Obscure Faith having no regard to the proper light and Evidence of the thing but only to the Testimony of the Revealer whose bare Authority is the only Motive that determines her Assent and the only Ground upon which she lays the whole weight of it though the Truth of the thing in it self absolutely Consider'd may also stand upon other Foundations be rationally accounted for by Arguments from within and so be seen by its own Light But let the Light shine never so bright upon the Object from other sides Faith lets in none nor has any regard to that which she finds there but connives at it and walks as I may say with her eyes shut contenting her self with the certainty of Revelation and leaving to Science if there be any the Evidence of the thing So that the Object is always dark to her how clear and bright soever it may be in it self or appear when absolutely consider'd to a Philosophic Eye In which respect it falls very short of the Perfection of Science though in respect of Firmness and Certainty it be equal to it as was said before All which is briefly couch'd in that excellent Account of Faith given by the Author to the Hebrews when he says that it is the Substance of things hoped for and the Argument of things not seen Where by Substance and Argument he equals it with Science in regard of the Firmness and Certainty of the Assent but by saying that 't is of things not seen he makes it vail and stoop to it in point of Evidence in which respect indeed Faith as Firm and as Certain as it is is as much inferiour to Science as Darkness is to Light 22. To gather up then what has been here discours'd at large concerning the inevidence of Faith into one view When we say that Faith is an inevident Assent we are not to understand this inevidence of the formal Reason of Faith but of the Matter of it And when we say that the Matter of it is inevident we should not intend by it that it is wholy and all over without Evidence but only that it has none from within or from the intrinsic Nature of the thing And when we say that the Matter of Faith is inevident from within this again is not to be intended of the simple Meaning of the Proposition but of the Truth of it And when we say that the Truth of it is inevident this again lastly is not to be understood as if it were always and necessarily so in its own Absolute Nature but only so far forth as it is Believ'd or as 't is consider'd under the formality of an Object of Faith Or in other words the inevidence of the Matter of Faith in respect of the Truth of the Article is not an Absolute but a Relative inevidence Not that the Matter of Faith is Never Absolutely and in the Nature of the thing inevident for it may be so too as will be seen afterwards but only that it is not necessarily so there