THE LAW AND the Gospell reconciled OR The Euangelicall Fayth and the Morall Law how they stand together in the state of grace A treatise shewing the perpetuall vse of the Morall Law vnder the Gospell to beleeuers in answere to a letter written by an Antinomiâ—◠〈◊〉 a faithfull Christian Also how the moraâ—â—â—â— of the 4th Commandement is continued in the Lords day proued the Christian Sabbath by diuine institution â—â—fe Catalogue of the Antinomian doctrinoc By HENRY BVRTON 1 TIM 1.5 The end of the Commandement is charity out of a pure heart of a good conscience and of fayth vnfained Vt Rota intra rotam currit sic lex intra Gratiam et obseruantia legis intra diuinâ— curriculum misericordiae est Ambros. de Iacob c li. 2. cap 11. LONDON Printed by J. N. for Thomas Slatter and are to bee sould at his shoppe in Blackfryars 1631. TO THE HIGH and Mighty Prince Charles by the grace of God King of Great Britaine France and Ireland Defender of the Fayth c. GRatious Soueraine this small treatise humbly pleades your Royall Patronage by a double title the one from the Author of it your old seruant who oweth all he is to your Maiesty the other from the worke it selfe being a defence of the Morall Law of God against the Antinomian Libertines in these daies who deny to beleeuers any more vse thereof And what one subiect can more iustly clame your Maiesties protection then this of the Morall Law sith you are not only by a proper title Defender of the fayth but by a common trust committed to Kings keeper of both Tables The discharge of which trust as it tends much to the honour of the great Lawgiuer who hath made you his Vicegerent to see his Lawes well executed So it is the maine propp and pillar to support and secure your royall Throne The consideration whereof when I saw these sonnes of Belial thus vndermining the Kings Throne hath prouoked my zeale both to God and to your Maiesty to write this simple Treatise For to deny the Morall Law to be of any more vse to belieuers or to be so much as a rule of conuersation or that they owe obedience vnto it in poynt of duety and conscience this strikes at the very root and cutts in sunder the kâ—â—ot not onely of christian charity but euen of all ciuill society and happy vnion and communion betweene King and Subiects Head and Members For first the rule of Gods true and vnmixed worship commanded in the first Table is taken away Secondly the rule of all christian and ciuill duties betweene man and man in whatsoeuer relation they stand of equality or inequality Commanded in the second Table and all this with one stroke of cutting off the Morall Law from belieuers And particularly these Antinomians cut off all dutifull and conscionable obedience to Princes grounded on the fift Commandement wherein they being principall Parents namely of our Country all due honour and obedience in the Lord is commaunded to bee giuen them in the first place as of children to their Father Againe on the other side they breake downe the bankes that God himselfe hath pitched to confine the course of Kings whose hearts in the Lords hand like the riuers of waters keeping within their bankes refresh the Land on euery side with their sweete streames but being without the bankes of Gods sacred lawes how soone might they ouerflow and drowne all Therefore it was the care of the wise and good God to the end he might prouide for the hapy welfare both of the King and People to leaue it in charge to the King of Israell that he should haue a coppy of the Law alwaies by him to reade therein day and night Deut 17.18 19 20. to learne thereby to feare the Lord his God to walke humbly among his brethren to doe iustice and iudgement to the end hee may prolong his dayes in his Kingdome hee and his Children in the middest thereof But these Lawlesse Antinomians enemyes to God to Kings and States would robb Christian Kings of this blessed Booke of Gods Law that soe if they could strippe them of the grace and feare of God in their hearts letting loosse the reynes of all honestie and conscience they might vsurpe a gouernment after the lust of man not after the law of God and so precipitate ineuitable ruine to Princes and Common-weales For take away Gods Law and what law of man can bynde the conscience eyther in poynt of obeying or of commanding For though it hath euer beene a Maxime among the very heathen that humaine Lawes and such as were ratified by solemne oathes and couenants betweene Prince and people they held sacred and inuiolable as that Law of the Medes and Persians the Kings writing and seale c. Dan. 6.16 Yet the maine ground that bore vp all the rest was the conscience they had by naturall instinct of Gods eternall Law written in their hearts accusing or excusing knowing that God was an auenger of the breach of lawes oathes couenants such as were agreeable to his Law This then being the strongest ligature to combine the Head and Body politicke in a firme society whereby it becomes inuincible perpetuall and glorious these sonnes of Belial would dismember all Wherein they plainely shew who is their syre 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that lawlesse one whose Motto is Volumus et iubemus wee will and command which style Platina notes to be first taken vp by Boniface the third who first vsurped the Papall Headship ouer the Church So as casting off all lawes of God and man hee became that great Beast described in the Reuelation whom no law or reason can bound or limit accounting it a disparagement to his tyrannicall greatnesse to bee confined within the lists of any lawes oathes vowes couenants though neuer so iust and sacred Now the Lord Iesus so blesse your Maiesty that trampling this Antinomian Anomian heresie both syre and sonnes vnder your sacred feete you may long and happily raigne ouer your people as a tender father ouer his children while your chiefe care is first for the mayntenance of Gods pure worship without mixture and for the execution of iustice and iudgement these two being the summe of both the Tables and the supporters of the Kings Throne which the Lord euer defend from all Antinomian Anomian spirits In this Treatise also J haue occasionally proued the diuine institution of the Lords day our Christian Sabbath denyed by some And as your raigne hath beene honoured with a pious law for the due obseruation of this great Holy-day of Christ So I trust that this my vindicating of it to its owne right of diuine institution will not a little helpe to the better execution of that your Christian law Which that it may be more reuerently and religiously obserued both in Court City and Country to the purging out of profanesse and to the increase of all christian graces in your
generally taught by the most sound learned and orthodox Diuines in England and so I may safely say in all the world then hee may well suspect a Pad in the straw and a serpent to lurke vnder the greene leaues and some thing more in it then at the first appeareth For touching the first position What one Protestant Diuine doth not hold and teach that sin is most detestable to God which his pure eyes cannot behold and that it makes a man odious in Gods sight Witnes the bitter and cursed death of the son of God himselfe which hee suffered for sin otherwise wee had all remained vnder the curse left to eternall perdition the iust punishment and reward of sin if it had not bin remoued by Christ So as herein the author hath no colour of accusation against his hoggs and doggs his aduersaries but this first Position serueth onely as an vsher to lead in the rest or as a harbinger to take vp the best rome in mens conceit for the rest of the traine by prepossessing the readers minde with an expectation of sutable doctrine in that which followeth Num 23.8 Wherein we shall finde that he playes but the cheater who showing one peece of good gold out of his purse would perswade his gull that his purse is full of such when all the rest is but counters or counterfet gold double guilt For the second position what Protestant Minister of the Church of England of what ranke soeuer bee he reckoned among his hoggs or among his doggs that holdeth not and teacheth not that the onely remedy to remooue mans misery by sin is Iesus Christ his death and passion his obedience actiue and passiue his whole righteousnesse freely imputed of God to euery true beleeuer What Protestant Diuine or other but holds iustification to be by fayth freely without workes And that those whom God iustifyeth hee so acquiteth them in abolishing their sin that hee remembreth it no more but casts it behinde his backe seeth it not any more in asmuch as he doth graciously for his sonnes sake not impute it to them So as what needes all that heaping vp of places of scripture as if none but the Author tooke notice of them or as if his doctrine were so vnknowne or doubted of as it needed such a cloud of proofes Yet some particulars in this position would bee a little talked with all As 1. where hee sayth That all sins in the beleeuers are vtterly abolished out of Gods sight by being not imputed This is most true Yet it puts mee in minde of that which I heard long agoe scattered abroad by this very Author that God seeth no sin in his children Which Aphorisme taken vp of the vulgar may breede in them that beleeue not presumptuous thoughts and resolutions voyd of the conscience of sin Therefore this poynt would be a little opened True it is God seeth no sin in his beleeuing children for which hee inflicteth the curse or any satisfactory penalty vpon them Thus when Balack would haue had Balaam to curse Gods people hee answered How shall I curse where God hath not cursed And v. 19. God is not as man that hee should lye or repent hath he sayd and shall hee not doe it Behold I haue receiued commandement to blesse and hee hath blessed and I cannot reuerse it And hee renders the reason He hath not beheld iniquity in Iacob neyther hath he seene preuersenesse in Israell the Lord his God is with him and the shout of a King is among them Surely there is no inchantment against Iacob nor diuination against Israell For Christ hath borne Israels sin in him hath God the Iudge fully punished it his iustice is fully satisfed for all Israels debts So that all being satisfied and discharged in our surety Christs righteousnesse and satisfaction made ours now God seeth not sin in his beleeuing children as a iudge to punish them yet he may be sayd to see as a father to chastise them Or when he chastiseth his childe hee seemeth to see his sin though done away in Christ and pardoned in Gods Court to the end his childe may come to see it and so haue the euidence of pardon sealed vnto him in the Court of his owne conscience And this is that which all sound Protestant Ministers teach and beleeue A second thing I note in his second position is if not an absurdity yet an obscure speech his words are All my sins both of my person and workes are truely abolished not out of me that there may be place for fayth Why Are sins abolished actually by imputation before fayth bee wrought that the abolishing of sin makes way to fayth True it is Christ hath taken away our sins and by death abolished death before we haue fayth to apply it for our fayth is from the merite and vertue of his death Otherwise I know not what sense to make of his words vnlesse hee meane that fayth alone takes place in the beleeuer working and doing all infallibly and freely as else where he expresseth himselfe without the Law of the ten Commandements 3 I note a falshood in it for he sayth All my workes are of vniust made iust before God What these works are I finde in other of his scatered pamphlets to wit all naturall ciuil religious sanctified actions which being in themselues as he sayth foule and filthy are made perfectly holy and righteous by free iustification Now this is a thing both imposible and were also vniust for God to doe it It is impossible for God to make a worke that is vniust to bee iust Indeed Antichrist arrogateth this omnipotent or rather impotent power as deriued from God to make ex iniustitia iustitiam righteousnesse of vnrighteousnesse but Gods omnipotency stretcheth not to make an vniust worke to be iust For then he might seeme to be both improuident and vniust in appointing his sonne to take away sin by the sacrifice of himselfe in case God could haue made of sin no sin by his meere omnipotency Indeede God can make a thing to cease to bee or hee can make a thing to bee which had not a being as hee did all the world but hee cannot so abolish a thing as to cause the former being of it not to haue bene a being after it hath once actually bene So of a wicked worke God is so powerfull so good so iust as that hee cannot make the wickednesse to bee good for that implies a contradiction but hee can and doth so abolish the wickednesse of our workes by Christ by not imputing of them as if it had neuer bin But to say our workes are of vniust made iust this as it is a phrase not vsed in scripture so in the Antinomians sense it tends to the bringing in of a heauenly state of perfection in this life For he would inferre herevpon that a man once in Christ iustified is altogether without sin in Gods sight abusing that place of Iohn 1 Ioh.
how the day of Christs Resurrection is made solemne and sacred not onely by Christ himselfe but by the Holy Ghost sent downe from heauen sanctifying this day for holy Conuocations or publicke assemblies of Gods people for his publique seruice and this to stand as a perpetuall statute to the end of the world hauing also euident and ample testimony from the Mosaicall Law and those Euangelicall types whence we conclude with M. Perkins his argument in his Cases of conscience pag. 113. That which is prefigured is prescribed But the Lords day was prefigured Leuit. 23.10 therefore it is prescribed and instituted of God A third place wee haue Psal 118.24 where the Prophet speaking v. 22.23 of Christs Resurrection he addeth This is the day which the Lord hath made we will reioyce and be glad in it This is a plane Propheticall institution of this day to bee solemnized vnder the new Testament For first the Lord hath made it that is appointed and set it a part by marking it out with a glorious worke And secondly it is so taken of the Church of God who saith We will reioyce and be glad in it which sheweth the festiuity gratefull solemnity of the Lords day And although many take this day for the whole time under the Gospell as 2. Cor. 6.2 yet none doe exclude or deny the particular acception of it for the Lords day St. Ambrose vnderstands this to be the Lords day the day of the Lords Resurrection which day saith hee on Psal 47 Titneus hath its holines from the Lords Resurrection What shall I say of Circumcision which was limited to the eighth day loking vpon Christs Resurrection which was the eighth day Circumcision being a singe of that hollines Christ brought vnto vs in the day of his Resurrection who rose againe for our Iustification But let this suffice Thus hath the Lords day not onely reall institution by Christ himselfe but also testimony from the Law and the Prophets And thus as Hugo saith The fathers of the old Testament obserued the septenary number or the seuenth of Dayes Wekes Moneths Yeares wee of the New the octonary number or the eight day to wit the Lords day for the reuerence of the Lords resurrection and of the sending of the Holy Ghost Hugo in Psal 1â—9 Ob. But here it is obiected that the Lords day hath noe diuine institution but meerely an hamane and Ecclesiasticall For else how came it to bee instituted by Constantine the Great who made a Law and prescribed limits for the keeping of it The like also did other Emperours Princes and States Councels and Synods in seuerall ages Answ This is no good argument that because pious Princes make Lawes for the keeping of the Lords day therfore it is not of diuine institution For so good Princes make Lawes against Adultery c. Therfore the forbidding of these sinnes is it not of diuine institution King Darius makes a decree that in euery Nation of his Kingdome men tremble before the God of Daniell c. therefore is not this Law of diuine institutioÌ„ Thou shalt worsbip the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serue And because Tyberius Caesar would haue the Romane Senate passe a Decree for the deifying of Christ or ranking him among their Gods therefor Christ was not God whereupon sayth Tertullian Ergo nisi homini placucurit Deus non erit Deus therefore if it doe not please man God shall not be God But it became Christian Princes when they saw how subiect the Lords day was to bee profaned with all licenciousnesse and how prone carnall men were to leape ouer all the bankes and bounds which God had set to keepe them in for to helpe to make vp the breaches againe and to strengthen the diuine ordinance by their humane and penall constitutions as wee see our noble Kings of England haue done by name our pious King Charles whose raigne hath bene honoured with a religious Law for the better keeping of the Lords day if lawes were as well kept as they haue bene wisely piously and iustly enacted by our Progenitors Yet because notwithstanding all Lawes diuine and humane this holy day of the Lord is for the generality of men little regarded as not requiring the like sanctification of vs which the Sabbath did of the Iewes let vs further shew what a reuerend esteeme the ancient holy men in former ages had and what pious rules they gaue concerning the religious keeping of this day Wee haue noted some of their excellent sayings a little before wee will adde a few more And first wee obserue that they euer did vse to call the Lords day by the name of the Sabbath Obseruamus sabbatum Aug Contra Adamantum c. 15 hoc est Dominicam in signum nempe aeterni sabbati We obserue the Sabbath that is the Lords day for a signe of the eternall Sabbath The same Augustine in his 95 sermon de Tempore sayth They which in the obseruation of the Sabbath doe not apply themselues to good works and prayer which is to sanctifie the Sabbath and sanctification is where the Holy Ghost is are like to the small flies bred of the mud which disquieted the Egyptians And elsewhere vpon those words Aug de Conseusu Euang. lib 1. c. 77. Math. 24.20 Pray that your slight be not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day hee sayth by winter is signified the cares of this life and by the Sabbath gluttony and drunkennesse which euil is therefore signifyed by the name of Sabbath because this was as now it is the wicked custome of the Iewes on that day to swimme in delicacies while they are ignorant of the spirituall Sabbath For the Iewes doe seruilely obserue the Sabbath day vnto ryotousnesse and drunkennesse How much better were it for their women to spin then on that day to daunce And thus while they carnally kept the Sabbath they knew it not sayth hee And Melius tota die foderent c. The men were better to digg all that day then to tread is out in daunces and measures Againe the Sabbath to wit the Lords day is more commaunded vs then the Iewes They celebrate the Sabbath seruilely but we spiritually And how spiritualy not in chambering wantonnesse not in gluttony druÌ„kennesse For these are forbidden Christians any day much more on the Lords day For it were better to plough harrow to spin card wooll which in themselues are lawfull then to doe those things on the Sabbath or Lords day which christians should blush at and be ashamed of to do at any time as to dance to reuell to heare playes to goe to masking and mumning and the like which are exercises fitter for heathen then christians for Bacchanalls then such as celebrate the Lords Festiuall How then is this day of the Lords to be kept Neyther as the Eneratites Aeriancs and Aerians who fasted all the Lords day but madly reueld on other festiuals These are