Selected quad for the lemma: conscience_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
conscience_n draw_v faith_n sprinkle_v 1,168 5 10.6414 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A25460 Fides Catholica, or, The doctrine of the Catholick Church in eighteen grand ordinances referring to the Word, sacraments and prayer, in purity, number and nature, catholically maintained, and publickly taught against hereticks of all sorts : with the solutions of many proper and profitable questions sutable to to [sic] the nature of each ordinance treated of / by Wil. Annand ... Annand, William, 1633-1689. 1661 (1661) Wing A3218; ESTC R36639 391,570 601

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

onely dipping but sprinkling or any other kind of washing as hath been before discovered To limit therefore the Ordinance of Dipping is to diminish the very sence and meaning of that Word 〈◊〉 by God to express that Ordinance which is a wrong both to him and the sence of the word 2. The word Baptize is used in Scripture where the word Dipping cannot nor ought not to be understood 1 Cor. 10.2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea Now let the History of the Iewes passing though the red Sea be observed and it will be found that not a man of Israel was dipped in either Some drops out of the Clouds might and questionless did fall upon the Tribes in going through the red Sea but that they were dipped in the cloud is non-sence to affirm in reason or that they were dipped in the Sea is false to affirm in History 3. The word baptize is used in Scripture where it were inconvenient to understand the word Dipped Acts 16.33 Acts 8.38 At this time this Sacrament was performed in haste and with all possible speed and the Eunuch as soon as baptized goes on his way rejoycing Now Dipping requires deliberation and provision both before and after to put off clothes to put on fresh cloths both for the baptizer and the baptized requires that which for this time cannot with conveniency be granted either for the one or the other 4. The word Baptize joyned with the word River doth not necessary imply dipping in Scripture and we find the word Baptize spoken of and no River mentioned in the Gospel Matth. 3.6 Iohn 3. ●3 Act. 16.33 Acts. 10.48 Act. 8.36 That place Matth. 3.6 And Iesus when he was baptized went up straight way out of the water holds not forth Dipping necessarily but rather that our Saviour was not baptized in Harvest For in Harvest Jordan overfloweth all his banks Ios 3.15 at that time being much dried up Iohn and Christ both might be truly said to go down to the water and to come from or out of the water without lying dipped over head and ears in it and without carrying either for dry cloaths or dry shirt we find him immediately driven to the wilderness Mark 1.12 and I am prone to suppose that it had not been very healthy for Iohn to have stood up to the middle in water so long a time and so much together as the multitude of the baptized would require if dipping must be necessarily understood in his Baptisme And what though Iohn also was baptizing in Enon because there was much water Iohn 3.23 In the Original it is many waters being a convenient place in respect water was not every where to be had where he and his Disciples might in several places baptize those multitudes that came to be baptized which possibly in other places particularly at Iordan could not so easily be done Besides there is a great difference between many waters or much water and deep water or a river of water none of which in Scripture is spoken of concerning AEnon so that dipping is not necessary to be seen or heard felt or understood about Salim and therefore cannot stand without something else to hold it up which is that grand errour that baptisme signifies onely dipping 5. If dipping had been essential to to the Sacrament that is that none ought to have been held as baptized without being plunged in a river without Question the Holy Ghost would in some place or other have told us of it and not to have left us a word of a large signification the spirit of God that leads us into all truth would have informed us in so necessary a point of doctrine in no place is there so much as a breathing for dipping yet we have sweet breathings of the spirit for that of sprinckling both in the Old and New Testament For 1. It is the usual sign of signification under the Law when things are hallowed or persons to be set apart for Gods service it was done with blood sprinkling Levit. 16.14 Levit. 4.6 Heb. 9.13 14. 2. It is a Gospel promise I will sprinckle clean water upon you and ye shall be clean which is the outward sign and I will put my spirit within you which is the thing signified Ezek. 36.25.26 and again I will pour water upon him that is thirsty the outward visible seal I will pour my spirit upon thy seed the thing inward invisible grace sealed Isa. 44.3 both those Texts in Leviticus and these in the Prophets have a shadow of good things to come Heb. 10.1 c. 3. The Apostle makes inward graces to be strengthened and given by outward signs Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience the inward grace and our bodies washed with pure water the outward sign he outward sprinkling or washing with water is an evidence of our hearts being sprinkled with blood with what blood with the blood of Christ which for that reason is called the blood of sprinkling 1 Peter 1.2 Heb. 12.24 could but one such Text be produced for dipping how might our adversaries boast and since we have such sure footing for our sprinckling besides the signification of the word baptize let us never be ashamed As it is not necessary for men to swill themselves with reverence it is spoken or drink large draughts of wine at the Sacrament of the supper a morsel being a sufficient sign of inward grace to remission of sin so it is not essential for men to plunge or dip themselves in large rivers at the Sacrament of baptisme sprinkling or any other decent application of water being a sufficient sign of our justification if adult of our regeneration being infant Further admit that dipping were essential to baptisme which it is not yet we may Question whether they be baptized that are dipped among them the water of baptisme being not applied to the flesh signifying the application of the blood of Christ to the soul. It is to be doubted whether it be applied to theirs whose bodys are not washed with water for they usually do it in rivers wells or horse-ponds as it is known for certain they have done in their shirts shifts and drawers and that ever the outward sign of baptisme was to be applied to such gear I suppose they will not affirm the baptismal water ought immediately to be applied to the body and the flesh washed with it as it is Sacrimental To say that Christ was so baptized is hard to affirm and the improbability of it hath already been handled And to say that he and all that came to Iohn were stripped naked is easie to be denied baptized he was we are sure and many others but that they were all dipped we have no certainty To conclude this Question dipping is not thought unlawful in the Catholick Church not that ridiculous kinde of dipping used
the Spirit as Faith Humility Charity c. with whcih graces whosoever prays by the spirit and the humble or faithfull soul shall by putting in practise the rules before given make known their humble and faithfull petitions with good apt orderly and found words as well as with unseigned lips Quest. 2. VVhether the wicked be bound to pray That none are exempted from this duty but that it is to be performed by all good or bad wicked and prophane by the sound Christian and by the formall Hypocrite ppeares 1. The duty of prayer is as large and as universall as that of reading hearing c. therefore to be practised by all 2. Prayer is a converting ordinance It is a meanes appointed for the obtaining of pardon of sin of the Holy Ghost of drawing nigh unto God and therefore no sinner exempted from it 3. The neglect of prayer is charged upon them as a sin Psal. 14.2 Psal. 10.4 4. The consciences of wicked men accuseth them when they have not prayed 5. God hath sometimes accepted the prayers of very wicked men even of them that have sold themselves to do wickedly 1 King 21.27 Quest. 3. Whether the set forms of Prayers used by law in the Church of England be Lawfull Before this question be directly answered we shall premise a few things 1. That the book of Common prayer had never been defended in this nature but that the crossnesse and peevishnesse of hot spirited men and passionate writers hath so defamed the the thing it self and also the users of it that it appears to be thought by them a sin unto Death Publickly or privatly to own it in the Church 2. That this defence doth not at all imply its necessity I am perswaded the Church of England might stand without it and may stand in purity by it Unifomity is necessary for the well-being of the Church as was known to the publishers of the Directory and if the Magistrate will have uniformity another way it may be had and if this way it may be used 3. That much of the Common-Prayer is in the Masse may be acknowledged to its honour It is but a furious and blind zeal that makes men inveigh against the Churches practise in this because of its affinity to Rome since we are to preserve the peace of the Church to our utmost we are not to decline too far from any opinion or practise that is lawfull the Jews preists did Sacrifice so did Baals The Papists uses this or that form of prayer if it be lawfull so may I that the breach or quarrel may appear to be one his part not on mine what ever is in the Masse that is lawfull and according to godliness is not to be despised and what ever is otherwise is to be condemned and shunned 4. That the book of Common-prayer might be altered and otherwise framed in some points bettered is not rationally to be denyed what book was ever composed by the wit or art of men but others might alter it and in some measure better it Let the Guisels view their Directory and I doubt not but they will find that somewhat might be left out and something put in part of it expunged and part of it enlarged 5. That by no meanes it ought to jostle out preaching is granted and is easily to be defended Prophecying is that ordinance that cheifly discovers the secrets of the heart that deceitfull part of man Prayer and Sacraments hath done vertuously but this excells them all and therefore for none of them is it to be disesteemed 6. That the Author hath competency of gifts for which he desires to be thankfull to do without Common-prayer as well as others Can they baptise pray bury marry c. without it absit a verbo I. Etantia so can he can they visit or pray sutably over the sick without it so can he can they promptly and readily vary their petitions at any time sutable to the duty in hand so can he In obedience to authority he useth it and so ought others though their gifts were more eminent then they are These things being considered we come now to answer the question And That the Liturgy Service book or Common-prayer of the Church of England is lawfull and with a safe conscience may be used appears by these following reasons 1. From the piety eminency and godlinesse of its composers they were men eminent and famous in their generation opposers of and to death some of them suffered for their not compliance to popish superstition when they were rooting out popery and disclaiming the Pope with all his adherents was that book compiled shall we Imagin the Guisels when they were composing the Directory were establishing Episcopacy if it were found to conjecture that why ought we to conceite the other in collecting the formes of that book of Common-prayer were confirming popery when of any other they most opposed it and suffered most by it It will not be a needlesse digression to spend a little time in shewing the occasion of compiling the book of Common-prayer and see the compilers The occasion of it was breifly this When Edward the sixth was by the Grace of God Crowned King of England c. and it being in his mind to perfect that reformation begun by his Father made many glorious acts for puryfying of the Church from Romish superstition particularly for administring the Sacrament of the supper under both kinds there were some in that time obeyed the King and some that did not so that the Sacraments were given by some one way and by others another way some were for the King some for the Pope and some were neuter to rectify which abuse and to extirpate popery with as little voyce as could be a writ is directed to the Archbishop of Canterbury who afterwards was burned by Queen Mary for his adhering to the Catholick or as the terme now is the protestant faith by the King and his counsell requiring him with others to meet and consult how to prevent for the future and remove that confusion for the present the service of the Church being then various after the use of Sarum Of York of Bangor and of Lincolne and besides them diverse other formes and bookes called Antiphoners Missales Graites Processionals Manuells Legends Pies Portuasses Couchers Iournalls Ordinals In a word every man used what form fashion or manner pleased him best This writ being sent to those persons hereafter to be mentioned they meet and after much debate consulting with the antient liturgyes of the Church expunging from them all what ever was not either in or agreeable to the word of God presented to that Godly King a book entituled The book of the Common-prayer and administration of the sacraments and other rites and Ceremonys of the Church after the use of the Church of England at the reading of which his Majesty being very thankfull both to God and man presented it to both his houses of Parliament assembled